alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CARL LEVIN 

MICHIGAN 

RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING 

WASHINGTON, DC 20510-2202 

(202) 224-6221 lanited States Senate 

WASHINGTON, DC 20510-2202 

November 7, 2011 

COMMITTEES: 

ARMED SERVICES 

GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS 

SMALL BUSINESS 

INTELLIGENCE 

Mr. Dennis DeVany, Chief 

Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

en 

C3 

^^^ ^ 

RE: DOT-OST-2003-15128 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

I write to urge your consideration of the Delta County Airport and Delta County Board of 

Commissioners preference request for an Essential Air Service (EAS) provider. 

I have long supported the EAS program as it provides affordable, reliable and safe air service 

which links rural communities to the national and global aviation system, while promoting 

economic growth and development. It is my imderstanding that the Delta County Airport Board 

and the Delta County Board of Commissioners have given careful consideration to the impact 

each bid would have on the community as well as input from area stakeholders. I support the 

means by which the Delta County officials have arrived at their selection preference, and have 

confidence in their conclusion. 

While the ultimate decision is in your capable hands, I hope you will fiilly consider the Delta 

County officials determination as to which service provider would be of greatest benefit to 

provide reliable air service to their community. 

I trust you will give this request every consideration. I would appreciate notification of your 

decision. Please forward your response to my aide, Ms. Liz Reed via the Escanaba office listed 

below. 

Sincerely, 

Carl Levin 

CL/er 

DETROIT 

477 MICHIGAN AVENUE 

SUITE 1860 

DETROIT, Ml 48226 

(313)226-6020 

JSCANABA 

rroN STREET 

SUITE LL-10 3 

ESCANABA, Ml 49829 

1906)789-0052 

GRAND RAPIDS 

FEDERAL BUILDING 

SUITE 720 

110 MICHIGAN STREET, N.W. 

GRAND RAPIDS, Ml 49503 

{616)456-2531 

STATE OFFICES 

LANSING 

124 WEST ALLEGAN STREET 

SUITE 1810 

LANSING, Ml 48933 

(517)377-1508 

SAGINAW 

ROOM 402 

515 NORTH WASHINGTON AVENUE 

SAGINAW, Ml 48607 

(989)754-2494 

TRAVERSE CITY 

107 CASS STREET 

SUITE E 

TRAVERSE CITY, Ml 49684 

(231)947-9569 

WARREN 

30500 VAN DYKE AVENUE 

SUITE 206 

WARREN, Ml 48093 

(586)573-9145
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The undersigned executive officer of Minden Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-QSB for the three
months ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.


                                              /s/ Becky T. Harrell
                                              Name: Becky T. Harrell
                                              Title: Chief Financial Officer and
                                                     Treasurer

Date: May 14, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Minden Bancorp, Inc. and will be
retained by Minden Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       24
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 I, Lorie M. Guerrera, Chief Accounting Officer of Cordia Corporation (the
"Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
period December 31, 2003 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

                              By: /s/ Lorie M. Guerrera
                                 -----------------------------------
                                 Lorie M. Guerrera
                                 Chief Accounting Officer

April 14, 2003
 * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Cordia Corporation and will be retained by Cordia Corporation and
furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                              PACIFIC STATE BANCORP

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Pacific State Bancorp (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,  2007,  as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report'),  the
undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  to the best of his
knowledge, that:

       (1)    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13 (a)
              or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)    The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
              operations of the Company

                                           Date: August 14, 2007

                                           /s/ Steven A. Rosso
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Steven A. Rosso
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
Unassociated Document


    
      
        

      

    

    Exhibit 10.26

    PARTICIPATION
AGREEMENT

    


    2007
Equity Plan for Non-Employee Directors of HNI Corporation

    


    This Participation Agreement (this
"Agreement") between _________________________ (print name) ("Director") and
HNI Corporation (the "Corporation") is for the period commencing January 1, ____
and ending December 31, _____, and is subject to all of the terms and conditions
of the 2007 Equity Plan for Non-Employee Directors of HNI Corporation (the
"Plan") and any successor plan.

    


    I elect to receive ________% of my
Director cash compensation paid in the form of HNI common stock in accordance
with the terms of the Plan.

    


    Dated ________________________,
_____.

    


    


    
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
               

            	
              Director

            	 
      


    

    


    


    Please
complete this Agreement and return it to the Corporation's Vice President,
Member & Community Relations, before January 1, _____ should you wish to
participate.

    


    Received and accepted by HNI
Corporation this   day
of_____________, ______.

    


    


    
      	 
      	
              HNI
      Corporation

            	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
              By:

            	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
              Name:

            	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
              Title:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



Patriot Scientific Corporation
San Diego, California



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed
Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-36418 and Form S-8 No. 333-57602) of
Patriot Scientific Corporation of our report dated August 9, 2001, except for
Note 1 dated as of August 15, 2001, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of Patriot Scientific Corporation, appearing in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2001. Our report contains an
explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern.


/s/  BDO Seidman, LLP


Denver, Colorado
August 29, 2001
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

CERTIFICATION  OF  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

I,  William  W.R. Elder, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report  of  Genus, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act  of  1934  and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form  10-K  fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results  of  operations  of  Genus,  Inc.


                                       By:      /s/  William  W.R.  Elder
                                                -------------------------
                                       Name:  William  W.R.  Elder
                                       Title:   Chief  Executive  Officer


<PAGE>
STATE v. Tyler Deion GREENFIELD

11A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2019

Jess D. Mekeel, Assistant Attorney General, Ben R. David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Kathryn L. VandenBerg, Assistant Appellant Defender, for Greenfield, Tyler Deion.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 21st of June 2019 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of June 2019."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 14th day of August 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
exv10w29






EXHIBIT 10.29




COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR OUTSIDE DIRECTORS




Cash Compensation



The cash fees paid to outside directors are as set forth below.




     Chairman of the Board



The Chairman of the Board of Directors, Mr. R.S. Evans, receives a cash retainer fee of $90,000 per
year. Mr. Evans receives no other cash compensation for his service on the Board and its
Committees.




     Other Non-Employee Directors



Non-employee directors, other than Mr. Evans, receive the following cash compensation:





	•	 	$22,500 annual Board retainer
	 
	•	 	$9,000 annual retainer for chairman of the Audit Committee
	 
	•	 	$1,350 annual retainer for other Audit Committee members
	 
	•	 	$2,700 annual retainer for chairman of the Management Organization and
Compensation Committee
	 
	•	 	$1,800 annual retainer for Executive Committee members
	 
	•	 	$1,800 for each Board meeting and Committee meeting attended





Stock Compensation



In accordance with a program in effect in 2009, each non-employee director was to be awarded, on
the date of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, a grant of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) having a
value of $15,000 on the date of grant. The RSUs were to vest in full on the date of the next Annual
Meeting of Stockholders or upon a change of control of the Company. The shares of stock represented
by vested RSUs were to be delivered to the director upon cessation of his service on the Board. On
April 20, 2009, the date of the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, there were no shares remaining
in the 2005 Nonemployee Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan (the “2005 Directors Plan”) and,
accordingly, none of the non-employee directors received a grant of RSUs in 2009.



In December 2009, the Board approved an amendment to the 2005 Directors Plan to increase the shares
available for issuance thereunder by 200,000 shares, to 275,000 shares. In December 2009, the Board
also approved a revision to the non-employee directors’ stock compensation program so that,
beginning in 2010, each outside director would be awarded annually, on the date of the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, RSUs for a number of shares equal to the lesser of (i) shares valued at
$15,000, or (ii) 7,500 shares.



The Company reimburses its directors for reasonable expenses incurred in attending Board and
Committee meetings.
#### State *ex rel.*Money Service Company, *et al. v.*J. T. Stuart, *J. P., et al.*

(No. 7337)

Submitted May 24, 1932.

Decided May 31, 1932.

*Gteoge S. Wallace, for*petitioners.

*Robert JE. White,*for respondents.

*371HATCHER, PRESIDENT:

In tbis proceeding the petitioner seeks to prohibit the enforcement of a judgment obtained on a summons of which the justice had no knowledge prior to issuance but which was issued by a clerk under general direction from the justice to sign his name to all official papers.

It is Hornbook law that a public officer cannot delegate a discretionary power. Throop on Public Officers, sec. 571; 46 C. J., subject Officers, sec. 291; 6 R. C. L., subject Constitutional Law. So we look to the statutes relating to the issuance of a summons by a justice to ascertain if the act involves any discretion. These statutes show that before a summons is issued a justice should determine (1) whether the action sought to be brought is within his general and territorial jurisdiction; (2) whether he is under any statutory disability to act; (3) whether the process should be directed to a regular or a special constable; (4) whether the summons is prepared in form or in substance as the statute directs; (5) whether the security for costs or security on a bond is good, where security is required at the institution of the action; (6) whether the person is credible where an oath is offered to secure an order or a warrant of arrest; and (7) in such case whether the complaint states an offense. Consequently it appears that the issuance of every summons involves the discretion of the justice.

The writ will therefore issue.

*Wnt issued.*
Description of Officer Benefits



 Exhibit 10.18 
 Officer Benefits 
 UAL Corporation and United Air
Lines, Inc. 
 Travel Benefits. Positive-space travel on United Airlines and United Express is provided to officers of UAL
Corporation and United Airlines and their eligible dependents and enrolled friends when applicable. Cash payments are made to federal and state tax authorities on behalf of each officer to cover the tax liability arising from usage of these travel
benefits. The travel benefit includes membership to United’s Red Carpet Club and enhanced status in United’s Mileage Plus Program for the officer and their spouse/domestic partner. 
 Financial Advisory Services. Support for financial planning and tax services are provided to all officers of UAL and United. Each new officer
receives reimbursement of up to $9,000 per year for their first two years as a UAL or United officer. Each year’s allotment must be used in that calendar year. All work for services provided in 2009 will be reimbursed/paid before March 15,
2010. 
 Cash Match Program. The Company offers a Cash Match Program to all Officers of UAL Corporation and United Air Lines, Inc. This
Program is designed to pay matching contributions to all officers in cash where, as a result of IRS limits, such matching contributions can not be made to the United Airlines Management and Administrative 401(k) Plan. In order to be eligible to
receive this payment, officers must contribute the maximum deferral amount to their 401(K) Plan. 
 Club Memberships. Payment is made by
United for the cost of social and business club memberships for certain officers where there is a benefit to be realized by the Company. The Company does not pay dues for clubs, which discriminate on the basis of race, sex, religion or national
origin. Such memberships are authorized by the Chairman of the Board of Directors consistent with Company policies. 
 Health &
Welfare Benefits. United has made arrangements with certain local hospitals to provide Company paid annual physical examinations for officers. The Company also reimburses officers for the cost of an annual medical examination if they obtain a
physical outside of this program. All officers receive three times their base salary in variable life insurance coverage from Paragon/MetLife Insurance. The premium is paid by United. Officers are eligible to contribute an additional amount for
coverage (from their own after-tax earnings), up to IRS limits, to leverage this program as a tax-advantaged investment option. 
 Company
Cars & Parking. The Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer is entitled to the use of cars owned or leased by United. For 2009, the Company did not own or lease any cars for the use of an individual executive, other than the
Chief Executive Officer. Officers located at Headquarters, 77 W. Wacker, Chicago, IL 60601, receive Company paid parking.
STATE of North Carolina v. Patrick Lewis BARNETT, Defendant.

No. COA18-831

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 20, 2019

NO PLAIN ERROR.
Exhibit 32.1



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Oxford Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Jacinta Sit, President
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's
knowledge:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



/s/ Jacinta Sit
------------------------------------
Jacinta Sit, President
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)


October 11, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          56,064
<SECURITIES>                                    72,565
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,645
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               321,680
<PP&E>                                          14,275
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,220
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 446,719
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          401,476
<BONDS>                                         12,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,750
<COMMON>                                        19,656
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,837<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   446,719
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,960
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,904
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,956
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,579
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,377
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,064
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,441
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.70
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES UNREALIZED LOSS ON SECURITIES AFS OF (187).
</FN>


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6829

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. OSCAR ANTONIO GRANDE, a/k/a Pantera, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:04-cr-00283-GBL-2; 1:06-cv-01022-GBL) Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 28, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lana Marie Manitta, RICH, ROSENTHAL, MANITTA, DZUBIN & KROEGER, LLP, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Patricia Tolliver Giles, Ronald Leonard Walutes, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Oscar Antonio Grande seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Grande has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Grande’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BMR Solutions, Inc. a Nevada corporation
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), K.
John Shukur, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of
his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
BMR Solutions, Inc., and will be retained by BMR Solutions, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.




/s/
      K. John ShukurK.
      John Shukur
                  Chief
      Financial Officer
                  August
      13, 2008