alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5469 

To require corporate income reported to the Internal Revenue Service to 

be included in annual reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2006 

Mr. GILLMOR (for himself and Mrs. MYRICK) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require corporate income reported to the Internal Revenue 

Service to be included in annual reports to the Securities 

and Exchange Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honest Income Disclo5 sure Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORTING OF TAX INCOME OF PUBLICLY TRADED 

7 CORPORATIONS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 13 of the Securities Ex9 change Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) is amended by add10 ing at the end the following: 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5469 IH

1 ‘‘(m) DISCLOSURE OF INCOME REPORTED TO THE

2 IRS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enact3 ment of the Honest Income Disclosure Act, the Commis4 sion shall revise the regulations under this section to re5 quire that each annual report required to be filed under 

6 this section include the income reported by the issuer to 

7 the Internal Revenue Service for the most recent taxable 

8 year. Such regulations shall require that such income be 

9 presented in a prominent location in each report and in 

10 a manner that permits a ready comparison of such income 

11 to income otherwise required to be included in such re12 ports under regulations issued under this section.’’. 

13 (b) REQUIREMENTS FOR THE EDGAR SYSTEM.— 

14 The Securities and Exchange Commission shall require 

15 that the information required to be filed with the Commis16 sion pursuant to regulations issued under the amendment 

17 made by subsection (a) be in a form and manner suitable 

18 for entry into the EDGAR system, and shall, immediately 

19 upon receipt of such information, make such information 

20 available via that system. 

Æ 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT


     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Betsy Henley-Cohn and John S.
Tomac, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, respectively, of
BIW Limited (the "issuer"), do each hereby certify that the report on Form 10-Q
accompanying this certification (the "report") fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the issuer.




/s/ Betsy Henley-Cohn
----------------------------
Betsy Henley-Cohn
Chairwoman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(chief executive officer)
BIW Limited

August 12, 2005




/s/ John S. Tomac
-----------------------------
John S. Tomac
President and Treasurer
(chief financial officer)
BIW Limited

August 12, 2005
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth Hicks, President and a director of
Argentex Mining Corporation (Principal Executive Officer), hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Argentex Mining
Corporation for the interim period ended July 31, 2007 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Argentex Mining Corporation

Dated: September 13, 2007



/s/ Kenneth HicksKenneth
Hicks President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Argentex Mining
Corporation and will be retained by Argentex Mining Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  1)
    
    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months
ended September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2)
    
    the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the three months ended September 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Plumas
Bancorp.
 Date:  November 2, 2009
    /s/ D. N. BiddleDouglas N. Biddle, Chief Executive Officer
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID** 06984 **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** 

### x 06984\06984_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 06984\06984_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### x 06984\06984_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 06984\06984_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 06984\06984_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 06984\06984_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 06984\06984_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 06984\Certification Statement Plant ID 06984.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 06984\Supplemental Documents\06984_Diagrams SI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 06984\Supplemental Documents\06984_ICR.SI.CoverPAge.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 06984\Supplemental Documents\SPD-A.xlsx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(a)

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE PRESIDENT RELATING TO A
                PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     I, Leonard A. Cullo, Jr., Director and President of H. J. Heinz Finance
Company, a Delaware corporation ("Heinz Finance"), hereby certify that, to my
knowledge:

     1. Heinz Finance's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July
        28, 2004 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
        amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        Heinz Finance.

Date: September 7, 2004

                                          By: /s/ LEONARD A. CULLO, JR.
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name: Leonard A. Cullo, Jr.
                                            Title:  Director and President
1 Attachment 

As requested by EPA, PPEC is providing the attached letter, which provides additional information requested by 

EPA . This letter is provided as an addition to the record supporting PPEC’s PSD permit application. 

 

Please let me know if you have any questions. 

 

Steve Hill 

 

RE: Pio Pico PSD Application Visibility Analysis 

Steve Hill 

to: 

Gerardo Rios, Roger Kohn, Cleveland Holladay, Joseph Lapka 

03/19/2012 12:11 PM 

Cc: 

Dave Jenkins, "grchandler@apexpowergroup.com", Craig Kebodeaux, "McKinsey, John 

A.", Gary Rubenstein, "Moore, Steve" 

Hide Details 

From: Steve Hill <SHill@sierraresearch.com> Sort List... 

To: Gerardo Rios/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Roger Kohn/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Cleveland 

Holladay/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Joseph Lapka/R9/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Dave Jenkins <djenkins@apexpowergroup.com>, "grchandler@apexpowergroup.com" 

<grchandler@apexpowergroup.com>, Craig Kebodeaux <Craig.Kebodeaux@kiewit.com>, 

"McKinsey, John A." <JAMCKINSEY@stoel.com>, Gary Rubenstein 

<GRubenstein@sierraresearch.com>, "Moore, Steve" <Steve.Moore@sdcounty.ca.gov>

GHG_BACT_&_PM25CALCS_03-19-12.pdf

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\chollada\Local Settings\Temp\notesDF63F8\~web6588.h... 3/26/2012
No. 09-9001.

#### Eliberto Vega Noriega, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

559 U.S. 1073, 130 S. Ct. 2100,

176 L. Ed. 2d 731,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3358.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT
      32.2




***CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO***


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Magnitude Information Systems, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 and Amendment
      No.
      1 thereto (collectively, the "Form 10-KSB"), I, Joerg H. Klaube, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the best of my **** knowledge,
      that the Company's Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in the Form 10-KSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
                August 7, 2007
            
            /s/
                Joerg H. KlaubeJoerg
                H. Klaube, Chief Financial Officer
exv10w16






Exhibit 10.16




TOTAL SYSTEM SERVICES, INC.



Board of Directors Compensation for Non-Employee Directors



Cash Compensation




	 	 	 	 	 

	Annual Board Retainer
	 	$	40,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Committee Member Retainers
	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee
	 	$	15,000	 
	Compensation Committee
	 	$	10,000	 
	Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
	 	$	7,500	 
	Executive Committee
	 	$	10,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Committee Chair Retainers*
	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee
	 	$	15,000	 
	Compensation Committee
	 	$	10,000	 
	Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
	 	$	7,500	 
	Executive Committee
	 	$	15,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Lead Director Retainer
	 	$	5,000	 








 




			
	*	 	Note: The committee chair receives both an annual committee member retainer and an annual
committee chair retainer.





Equity Compensation




An annual equity award with a fixed value of $20,000, with 50% awarded in the form of fully vested
stock options and 50% in the form of fully vested shares




Director Stock Purchase Plan




	 	 	 	 	 

	Annual maximum company cash contribution per director participant
	 	$	3,000	 
	to company-sponsored open market stock purchase plan, with
company’s contribution equal to 15% of director participant’s cash
contribution, subject to annual maximum contribution limit by director
of $20,000. Employee directors may participate in this plan.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.A


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2002, of Cedar Brakes II, L.L.C. (the "Company") as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Clark C. Smith, President (Principal Executive Officer), certify (i) that the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                              /s/ Clark C. Smith
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Clark C. Smith
                                              President
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)

                                              August 14, 2002
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 13 - 18 - 00240 - CV In the Interest of S. H., a Child On Appeal from the 343rd District Court of Bee County , Texas Trial Cause No. B - 17 - 1169 - CV - C JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on a ppeal, vacates the trial court’s judgment and dismisses the case. The Court orders the judgment VACATED and the case is DISMISSED. No c osts are assessed as appellant filed an affidavit of inability to pay costs. We further order this decision certified below for observance. September 2 7 , 2018
John Paul HEINZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 105457

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: April 3, 2018

FOR APPELLANT: Ellen H. Flottman, Public Defender's Office, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203.

FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Robert J. Bartholomew, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

*315John Paul Heinz appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Richard HUNT, Appellant, v. SUMNER GROUP, INC., Respondent.

ED 105692

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: February 27, 2018

James V. O'Brien, Andrew S. Buchanan, Buchanan & Williams, P.C. Public Defender, 7908 Bonhomme Ave., Ste. 200, Clayton, MO 63105, for Appellant.

John J. Gazzoli, Jr., Theresa A. Phelps, Jessica C. Gittemeier, Rosenblum Goldenhersh, P.C., 7733 Forsyth Blvd., Ste. 400, St. Louis, MO 63105, for Respondent.

Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Richard Hunt ("Hunt") appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Sumner Group, Inc. ("Sumner") on his petition for workers' compensation retaliation pursuant to Section 287.780 RSMo (2000). Each of Hunt's points on appeal contend the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Sumner because there was sufficient evidence in the record to create a genuine issue of material fact. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been *14furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 12

- 00857

- CR

Charles D. WILLIAMS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR5580B

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED December 4, 2013.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 49 (Monday, March 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 11138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5600]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


 Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) Meeting of the 
Subcommittee on Plant License Renewal; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Plant License Renewal will hold a meeting 
on April 1, 2009, Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:
    Wednesday, April 1, 2009-8:30 a.m.-12:30 p.m.
    The Subcommittee will discuss the license renewal application for 
the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 and the 
associated Safety Evaluation Report (SER) with Open Items prepared by 
the staff. The Subcommittee will hear presentations by and hold 
discussions with representatives of the NRC staff, PPL Susquehanna, and 
other interested persons regarding this matter. The Subcommittee will 
gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate 
proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the 
full Committee.
    Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or 
written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. 
Peter Wen (telephone (301) 415-2832 five days prior to the meeting, if 
possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic 
recordings will be permitted. Detailed procedures for the conduct of 
and participation in ACRS meetings were published in the Federal 
Register on October 6, 2008 (73 FR 58268-58269).
    Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by 
contacting the Designated Federal Official between 6:45 a.m. and 3:30 
p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact 
the above named individual at least two working days prior to the 
meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda.

    Dated: March 10, 2009.
Cayetano Santos,
Chief, Reactor Safety Branch A, Advisory Committee on Reactor 
Safeguards.
 [FR Doc. E9-5600 Filed 3-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GURPREET SINGH,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 16

- 70142

Agency No. A205

- 935

- 296

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 18, 2017 **

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Gurpreet Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions pro se for review of

the Board of Immig ration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denyin g Singh’s motion to

r econsider his claims for asylum, withholding of removal , and relief under the

Convention Against Torture

. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously conclud es this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 21 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 70142

review for abuse of discretion the agen cy’ s denial of a motion for reconsideration.

Cano

- Merida v. INS , 31 1 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir. 2002). W e dismiss in part and

deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider the well

- founded fear contentions that Singh

failed to raise before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft , 358 F.3d 674, 677

- 78 (9th

Cir. 2004).

The BIA did not abuse its discreti on in denying Singh’ s motion to r econsider

his claims because he failed to identify a legal or factual error in the BIA’ s prior

decision. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1) (a motion to reconsider must identify errors

of fact or law in a prior decision); M a v. Ashcroft , 361 F.3d 553, 558 (9th Cir.

2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part

.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Noble Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James C. Day, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

May 9, 2005                            /s/ JAMES C. DAY
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       James C. Day
                                       Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
                                       President of Noble Corporation
Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Form 10-Q
  1.
    This Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and2.
    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.  Dated: April 30, 2009

By:   /s/ Mary Jane RobertsonMary
    Jane Robertson
    Executive Vice President,
    Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
    47
No. 09-877.

#### John J. Pudelski, Petitioner v. Julius Wilson, Warden.

560 U.S. 904, 130 S. Ct. 3274,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1182,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3979.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 576 F.3d 595.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 24, 2014

s0616

Order 

Clerk

June 24, 2014

148478

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148478

COA: 318108

Kent CC: 10-005462-FC

MARQUISE LESJUAN HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 15, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
#### Charles C. McCormick, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February 22, 1928.

*C. B. Mathis,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Fred H. Davis,*Attorney General, and *Boy Campbell,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

*321Per Curiam.

The probative force and effect of the evidence in this case is such that the judgment should be reversed on authority of the opinion in the case of Stedman v. State, 80 Fla. 547, 86 Sou. Rep. 428, and it is so ordered.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.