alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5544 

To provide for the security of critical energy infrastructure. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 7, 2006 

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for the security of critical energy infrastructure. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EVACUATION PLAN REVIEW. 

4 Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment 

5 of this Act, the Secretary of Energy shall transmit to the 

6 Congress a report of the Secretary’s review of the fuel sup7 ply plan components of State evacuation plans and the 

8 National Capitol region. Such report shall determine the 

9 sufficiency of such plans, and shall include recommenda10 tions for improvements thereto. Annually after the trans11 mittal of a report under this section, the Secretary shall 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5544 IH

1 transmit a report to the Congress assessing plans found 

2 insufficient under previous reports. 

3 SEC. 2. DISASTER ASSISTANCE. 

4 (a) AUTHORITY.—During any federally declared 

5 emergency or disaster, the Secretary of Energy may pro6 vide direct assistance to private sector entities that oper7 ate critical energy infrastructure, including refineries. 

8 (b) ASSISTANCE.—Assistance under this section may 

9 include emergency preparation and recovery assistance, in10 cluding power generation equipment, other protective or 

11 emergency recovery equipment, assistance to restore ac12 cess to water, power, or other raw materials, and transpor13 tation and housing for critical employees. The Secretary 

14 may request assistance from other Federal agencies in 

15 carrying out this section. 

16 SEC. 3. CRITICAL ENERGY ASSURANCE ACCOUNT. 

17 There is established in the Treasury an account 

18 known as the Critical Energy Assurance Account. The 

19 Secretary of Energy shall deposit into this account 

20 amounts appropriated to the Secretary for the purpose of 

21 carrying out this Act and payments paid to the Secretary 

22 by any non-Federal source for the purpose of carrying out 

23 this Act. The Secretary may receive and accept payments 

24 from any non-Federal source, and amounts deposited into 

25 the account, whether appropriated or received from a nonVerDate Aug 31 2005 22:04 Jun 09, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5544.IH H5544

wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5544 IH

1 Federal source, shall be available to the Secretary, without 

2 further appropriation, for carrying out this Act. 

3 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

4 The Secretary of Energy may issue regulations nec5 essary or appropriate to carry out this Act. 

Æ 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1


                              PACIFIC STATE BANCORP

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific State Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
knowledge, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company



                                     PACIFIC STATE BANCORP

                                     Date: August 12, 2005

                                     BY: /s/ STEVEN A. ROSSO
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Steven A. Rosso
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer

                                       29
In the MATTER OF: T.O., J.O.

No. COA18-1110

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 16, 2019

AFFIRMED.
No. 09-9907.

#### Ryland Doyle Schuster, Petitioner v. Randy Blades, Warden.

560 U.S. 913, 130 S. Ct. 3310,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1199,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4037.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 21.
No. 11-7513.

#### Aubrey Stanley, Petitioner v. Douglas Mason, et al.

565 U.S. 1180, 132 S. Ct. 1148,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1022,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1039.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 15.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-81825 and 333-149634 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-190307
on Form F-3 of Vodafone Group Plc of our report dated February 27, 2014 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Vodafone Group Plc for the
year ended March 31, 2014.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
|                         
|New York, New York       
|June 10, 2014
#### In the Matter of the Claim of James E. Washington, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[717 NYS2d 787]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 30, 2000, which, *inter alia,*ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Following his separation from employment under nondisqualifying circumstances, claimant collected unemployment insurance benefits from August 1998 to February 1999. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board subsequently determined that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits on the basis that he was not totally unemployed, inasmuch as he received compensation for teaching classes at a health club during the relevant time period. The Board then charged claimant with an overpayment of $3,245 in recoverable benefits, determined that his continued certification of eligibility amounted to a willful misrepresentation and reduced his right to receive future benefits by 184 effective days.

We affirm. Substantial evidence supports the Board’s assessment of claimant’s credibility and the inferences drawn from the evidence presented *(see, Matter of Luongo [Commissioner of Labor],*276 AD2d 996; *Matter of Falco [Sweeney],*246 AD2d 711, *lv denied*92 NY2d 815), as well as the separate finding of *694willful misrepresentation *(see, Matter of Srinivasan [Commissioner of Labor],*275 AD2d 846; *Matter of Murak [Sweeney],*244 AD2d 751).

Claimant’s remaining arguments have been examined and found to be unpersuasive.

Spain, J. P., Carpinello, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jeremy A. RUTHERFORD, Appellant.

No. ED 105111

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

FILED: January 30, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 22, 2018 Application for Transfer Denied May 1, 2018

Christian E. Lehmberg, Woodrail Centre, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Nathan J. Aquino, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

*276*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Jeremy Rutherford ("Appellant") appeals from the trial court's judgment, following a jury trial, convicting him of the class A misdemeanor of assault of a law enforcement officer in the third degree, in violation of Section 565.083 (RSMo. 2000 ), and two counts of the class C felony of unlawful possession of a firearm, in violation of Section 571.070. Appellant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender, pursuant to Section 558.016, to two 15-year sentences for the counts of unlawful possession of a firearm, which were to run consecutively. Appellant also received a one-year sentence for the assault of a law enforcement officer, which was to run concurrent with the other sentences for a total sentence of 30 years.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Robert K. Moskovitz, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 ofLease Equity Appreciation Fund I, L.P.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) [omission in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8760 (December 15, 2006)] for theregistrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) [omission in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8760 (December 15, 2006)];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 15, 2007 /s/ Robert K. Moskovitz   Name:  Robert K. Moskovitz   Title:  Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner
**EXHIBIT 31.1****Rule 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION**I, Donald L. Denney, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Monarch Community Bancorp, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have; a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluations; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: August 14, 2007 By:             /s/ Donald L. Denney     Donald L. Denney    President and Chief Executive Officer  
22
#### In the Matter of Michiko Lee, Respondent, v Ping Lee, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 871]

In a proceeding pursuant to the *630Uniform Support of Dependents Law (Domestic Relations Law art 3-A), the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Salinitro, J.), dated June 29, 1999, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Gartner, H.E.), dated April 7, 1999, terminating his child support obligation only as of January 28, 1995, and fixed child support arrears at $9,540.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the facts, by reducing the amount of child support arrears to $9,420; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the petitioner.

The father’s child support obligation ceased on January 28, 1995, the date his youngest child turned 21 years of age *(see,*Family Ct Act § 413; Domestic Relations Law § 32 [3]; *Lucas v Fiero,*138 AD2d 488).

The Hearing Examiner properly refused to credit the father’s voluntary payments to the parties’ children against his total arrears *(see, Minka v Minka,*219 AD2d 810; *Fabrizio v Fabrizio,*125 AD2d 634; *Lefkow v Lefkow,*188 AD2d 589). However, the Hearing Examiner incorrectly calculated the father’s child support arrears to be $9,540. In a statement dated September 16, 1998, the Support Collection Unit assessed child support arrears against the father in the amount of $9,600, representing unpaid support payments through January 27, 1995. However, in a subsequent statement dated April 7, 1999, the Support Collection Unit noted that the father had paid $180 towards this outstanding balance, which served to reduce the total amount owed to $9,420.

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. Krausman, J. P., Luciano, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
----

----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  August                14, 2007 | /s/                Crit S.                DeMent                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                            | Name:                Crit S. DeMent                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|                                            | Title:                Chief Executive Officer of the General                Partner                                                                                                                                                              |

----

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 May 9, 2008
    /s/ THOMAS L. MITCHELLThomas L. MitchellSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Controller of Noble Corporation
ORLANDO RESIDENCE, LTD. v. ALLIANCE HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, LLC, et al.

113A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 6, 2019

Kenneth E. Nelson, for Nelson, Kenneth E.

Jackson Wyatt Moore, Jr., Attorney at Law, Raleigh, J. Gray Wilson, Attorney at Law, for Alliance Hospitality Management, LLC, et al.

F. James Warmoth, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Orlando Residence, LTD.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 3rd of May 2019 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of May 2019."
Exhibit 10.28


 


EARTHLINK, INC.


 


Board of Directors Compensation Plan


 


Effective January 2010


 


1.               Retainers


a.               Each independent director
receives a $35,000 annual retainer, paid semi-annually in advance ($17,500
following January Board meeting and $17,500 following July Board
meeting).


b.              The Lead Director receives
an additional $20,000 annual retainer, paid semi-annually in advance ($10,000
following the January Board meeting and $10,000 following the July Board
meeting).


c.               The Audit Committee chair and
the Leadership and Compensation Committee chair each receive an additional
$20,000 annual retainer, paid semi-annually in advance ($10,000 following January Board
meeting and $10,000 following July Board meeting).


d.              The Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee chair receives an additional $10,000 annual retainer, paid
semi-annually in advance ($5,000 following January Board meeting and
$5,000 following July Board meeting).


 


2.               Meeting Fees


a.               Each independent director is
paid $1,000 for each full Board meeting and Committee meeting he or she attends
in person and $500 for each full Board meeting and Committee meeting he or she
attends telephonically.


 


3.               Restricted Stock Units


a.               Independent directors
receive an initial grant when they join the Board of Restricted Stock Units
(RSUs) valued at $45,000.


b.              Additionally, independent
directors receive a grant of RSUs valued at $40,000 on the first business day
of January of each year and a grant of RSUs valued at $40,000 on the date
of the July Board meeting each year.


c.               RSUs will vest one year from
the date of grant, provided the director is serving as an independent director
at that time.


 


i.       Note:  Each RSU is equal to one share of EarthLink
stock.  Upon vesting, the RSUs may be
received in shares of stock (in which case the recipient has taxable income
equal to the value of the shares received on the date of vesting).


 


4.               Meeting Expenses


a.               EarthLink reimburses
directors for their expenses incurred in attending Board of Directors and
Committee meetings.


 


5.               Education Expenses


a.               EarthLink will pay reasonable
program fees and associated travel expenses for each director to participate in
one or more additional relevant director education programs.  In selecting director education programs,
directors should consider general Board governance and specific Committee
focus.