# Mineral Wool Cupola

NAIMA/U.S. EPA

Emissions Test Report

Prepared for:



# Isolatek International

Huntington Plant

701 North Broadway Street

Huntington, Indiana

BTEC Project No. 10-3990.16

December 6, 2010

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan 48220

(248) 548-8070

## Isolatek International BTEC Project No. 10-3990.16

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 6, 2010 

## i Executive Summary

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA)

and its members to a voluntary co llection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production 1 

## as well as for

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 2 

## . To assist in collecting the agreed upon data,

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was re tained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates

of the following pollutants from the one exhaust stack associated with the cupola baghouse (SV

#1) located at the Isolatek International (Isola tek) site in Huntington, Indiana:

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate ma tter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM 2.5 

## )

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromi um, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and

selenium

• Mercury

• Hexavalent chromium

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride

• Carbon monoxide and carbonyl sulfide

Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and

NAIMA prior to initiating test pr ogram fieldwork. Table I on the following page summarizes the

overall results of the emissions test program.

1 

## Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD)

2 

## Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

## Isolatek International BTEC Project No. 10-3990.16

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 6, 2010 

## ii Table I

Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Source Test

Date(s) Pollutant MDL

used Emission

Rate

(lbs/hour) Emission

Rate

(lbs/ton) Emission

Rate

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM 2.5 

## < 1.0E-01 1.3E-02 8.1E-01

Organic

Condensible PM 2.5 

## 5.7E-01 7.9E-02 4.5E+00

Inorganic

Condensible PM 2.5 

## 2.0E+00 2.6E-01 1.6E+01 Cupola

Exhaust October 26

& 27, 2010

Total PM 2.5 

## < 2.7E+00 3.5E-01 2.1E+01

Filterable

Particulate < 3.4E-01 4.1E-02 2.7E+00

Antimony < 9.2E-05 1.1E-05 7.3E-04

Arsenic 1.4E-04 1.7E-05 1.1E-03

Beryllium < 1.5E-05 1.8E-06 1.2E-04

Cadmium 3.2E-05 3.6E-06 2.5E-04

Chromium 5.2E-05 6.0E-06 4.1E-04

Cobalt 3.2E-05 3.8E-06 2.5E-04

Lead 5.7E-04 6.8E-05 4.5E-03

Manganese 3.1E-03 3.7E-04 2.5E-02

Nickel < 8.1E-05 9.5E-06 6.4E-04 Cupola

Exhaust October 27

& 28, 2010

Selenium 3.3E-03 4.0E-04 2.6E-02

Cupola

Exhaust October 26,

2010 Mercury 2.5E-04 4.0E-06 2.5E-04

Cupola

Exhaust October 27

& 28, 2010 Hexavalent

Chromium < 1.4E-05 1.7E-06 1.1E-04

Hydrogen

Chloride 5.4E-02 6.5E-03 4.2E-01 Cupola

Exhaust October 27,

2010 Hydrogen Fluoride 6.1E-02 7.2E-03 4.7E-01

Carbon Monoxide 1.9E+03 2.8E+02 1.5E+04 Cupola

Exhaust October 26,

2010 Carbonyl Sulfide 1.9E+01 2.7E+00 6.8E+01

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

## because exhaust from the

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

## ).

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the an alytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the

sample fractions.

## Isolatek International BTEC Project No. 10-3990.16

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 6, 2010 

## iii TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 1

2.1 P ROCESS 

## M ONITORING 

## ....................................................................................................... 2

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES.............................................. 2

3.1 E XHAUST 

## G AS 

## V ELOCITY



## , M OLECULAR 

## W EIGHT



## , AND 

## M OISTURE 

## C ONTENT 

## .................... 2

3.2 PM AND 

## PM 2.5 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ................................................... 3

3.3 T OTAL 

## S ELECTED 

## M ETALS 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ................................ 3

3.4 H G 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ..................................................................... 4

3.5 H EXAVALENT 

## C HROMIUM 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ................................. 4

3.6 HF AND 

## HC L 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ..................................................... 4

4.0 TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................................. 1

TABLES

Table 1 – Test Personnel

Table 2 – Emissions Test Program Summary

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram

Figure 2 – Method 3A Sampli ng Train Schematic Drawing

Figure 3 – OTM 27/OTM 28 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing

Figure 4 – Method 29 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing

Figure 5 – Method 30B Sampli ng Train Schematic Drawing

Figure 6 – Method 0061 Sampli ng Train Schematic Drawing

Figure 7 – Method 26A Sampli ng Train Schematic Drawing

Figure 8 - Method 318 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Detailed Test Run Results

Appendix B – Production Data

Appendix C – Field and Computer-G enerated Data Sheets and Notes

Appendix D – Equipment Calibration Documents

Appendix E – Laboratory Analytical Reports

Appendix F – Method 320 Analytical Report

## Isolatek International BTEC Project No. 10-3990.16

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 6, 2010 1 

## 1.0 Introduction

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA)

and its members to a voluntary co llection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production 3 

## as well as for

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 4 

## . To assist in collecting the agreed upon data,

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was re tained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates

of the following pollutants from the one exhaust stack associated with the cupola baghouse (SV

#1) located at the Isolatek International (Isola tek) site in Huntington, Indiana:

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate ma tter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM 2.5 

## )

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromi um, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and

selenium

• Mercury

• Hexavalent chromium

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride

Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and

NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. The emissions test program was conducted on

October 26, 27, and 28 2010. The test program consisted of triplicate emission tests at one

exhaust stack for each parameter. The field sampling portion of the emissions test program

included the personnel su mmarized by Table 1.

Table 1

Emissions Test Program Personnel

Personnel Affiliation

Thomas Snyder BTEC

Barry Boulianne BTEC

Matthew Young BTEC

Paul Molenda BTEC

Barbara White Isolatek

2.0 Process Description

The Isolatek facility in Hunti ngton includes two coke-f ired cupolas used to melt slag and rock

and form it into slag wool used in the manufactur e of fire-resistant materials. Exhaust from both

cupolas, as well as exhaust from the raw material receiving and weighing ope rations, is routed to

a single Cupola Baghouse #1 (CE #1).

The stack serving Cupola Baghouse #1 (SV #1) is r ound and 40 inches in di ameter at the test

location. The stack is equipped with two emission test ports, each four inches in diameter.

Testing was conducted from a stack platform locat ed approximately fift y feet above the ground

3 

## Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD)

4 

## Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

## Isolatek International BTEC Project No. 10-3990.16

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 6, 2010 2 

## level. Exhaust gas temperatures during the testing period averaged 200 o 

## F. The Isolatek facility

in Huntington is located at 701 Nort h Broadway in Huntington, Indiana.

2.1 Process Monitoring

During the emissions test program, both cupolas were operated at normal production rates. In

addition to total production for each test run, process operating data recorded at 5-minute

intervals during the emissions test program in cluded (1) baghouse operating temperature, (2)

baghouse pressure drop, (3) partic le detector reading, and (4) baghouse fan amperage. Process

production data is available in Appendix B. Cont rol equipment data will be available to U.S.

EPA on request.

3.0 Sampling and Analytical Methodologies

Sampling and analytical methodologies for the em issions test program can be separated into

seven categories as follows:

(1) Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, mo lecular weight, and moisture content;

(2) Measurement of exhaust gas PM and PM 2.5 

## concentrations and emission rates;

(3) Measurement of exhaust gas total selected metals concentrations and emission rates;

(4) Measurement of exhaust gas Hg concentrations and emission rates;

(5) Measurement of exhaust gas hexavalent chro mium concentrations and emission rates;

(6) Measurement of exhaust gas HF and HCl concentrations and emission rates; and,

(7) Measurement of exhaust gas carbon m onoxide (CO) and carbonyl sulfide (COS)

concentrations and emission rates.

Descriptions of sampling and analytical methodologies by cate gory are summarized by Sections

3.1 through 3.7, respectively.

3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity, Molecular Weight, and Moisture Content

Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecula r weight, and moisture content was conducted

using the following reference test methods codifi ed at Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code

of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 60, Appendix A):

Method 1: “Location of the Sampling Site and Sampling Points”

Method 2: “Determination of Stack Gas Velo city and Volumetric Flowrate”

Method 3A: “Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in Emissions

from Stationary Sources”(Instru mental Analyzer Procedure)

Method 4: “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases”

These test methods were used to evaluate exha ust gas flowrates either in conjunction with the

isokinetic sampling methodologies used to evaluate some pollutant emission rates or as separate,

discrete measurements conducted in support of the non-isokinetic sa mpling methodologies.

## Isolatek International BTEC Project No. 10-3990.16

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 6, 2010 3 

## Stack gas velocity traverses we re conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in

Method 1 and Method 2 (see Figure 1 for a traverse location drawing). An S-type pitot tube with

a thermocouple assembly, calibrated in accordance with Method 2, Section 4.1.1, was used to

measure exhaust gas velocity pressures (using a manometer) and temperatures at each location

during testing. The S-type pito t tube dimensions was within specified limits, therefore, a

baseline pitot tube coefficient of 0.84 (dimensionless) was assigned.

Molecular weight was determined ac cording to USEPA Method 3A. The O 2 

## content of the

exhaust gas was measured us ing a M&C Products PMA 100-L O 2 

## gas analyzer (or equivalent)

and the CO 2 

## content of the exhaust gas was measured using a California Analytical Instruments

(CAI0 600 Series CO 2 

## gas analyzer (or equivalent). An in tegrated sample of the gas stream was

drawn through an insulated stainless-steel probe w ith an in-line glass fiber filter to remove any

particulate and into a tedlar sample bag utilizi ng a evacuated sample lung. At the completion of

each test the gas sample was introduced to the analyzers. Data was recorded at 4-second

intervals on a PC equipped with data acquisition software. A sc hematic drawing of the emission

monitoring system is provided as Figure 2.

Exhaust gas moisture content was evaluated usin g Method 4. Exhaust gas moisture content was

be determined volumetrically (liquid impingers ) and gravimetrically (silica gel impinger).

3.2 PM and PM 2.5 

## Concentrations and Emission Rates

PM/PM 2.5 

## concentrations and emission rates were measured using U.S. EPA Other Test

Methods (OTM) 27 and OTM 28. PM, PM 2.5 

## , and CPM concentrations and emission rates were

measured using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic st ack sampling system. This

system consisted of (1) a tapered nozzle, (2) a PM 10 

## particle sizer cyclone followed by a PM 2.5 

## particle sizer cyclone, (3) a glass or quartz fi ber filter assembly and h eated probe, (4) a glass

recirculating ice water condenser system, (5) a set of four GS impingers, (6 ) a length of sample

line, and (7) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pum p, dry gas meter, and calibrated

orifice. Prior to each test, the second and th ird impingers were filled with 100 ml of HPLC

water, the first and fourth impingers we re empty, and the fifth impinger contained

approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccan t. A schematic drawing of the PM 2.5 

## /CPM sample

train is provided as Figure 3. The total filterable PM faction was collected on the front half of

the M29 Metals sampling train as per the QAPP.

3.3 

## Total Selected Metals Concentr ations and Emission Rates

Total selected metals concentrations and emissi on rates were measured us ing the procedures of

40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 29. Selected meta ls concentrations and emission rates were

measured using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic st ack sampling system. This

system consisted of (1) a borosilicate glass or qu artz nozzle, (2) a steel probe w/glass liner, (3) a

heated quartz fiber filter assemb ly, (4) a set of six GS impingers , (5) a length of sample line,

and (6) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice.

Prior to each test, the first two impingers were filled with 100 ml of a 5% nitric acid

(HNO 3 

## )/10% hydrogen peroxide solution, the thir d impinger was empty, and the fourth

## Isolatek International BTEC Project No. 10-3990.16

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 6, 2010 4 

## contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desi ccant. A schematic drawing of the metals

sampling train is provided as Figure 4.

3.4 Hg Concentrations and Emission Rates

Hg concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 40 CFR 60,

Appendix A, Method 30B and using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack

sampling system. This system consisted of (1 ) a sorbent trap, (2) a steel probe, (3) Teflon

tubing, (4) three GS impingers, (5) a le ngth of sample line, and (6) a Nutech ® control case

equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrate d orifice. The first impinger was left empty

as a water knockout, and the remaining two impi ngers contained approximately 300 g of silica

gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Hg sampling train is provided as Figure 5.

3.5 Hexavalent Chromium Concentr ations and Emission Rates

Hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of

Method 0061 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM-98.01. Hexavalent chromium concentrations and

emission rates were measured using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack

sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a glass nozzle, (2) a heat ed steel probe with a

glass probe liner, (3) a Teflon tee with a recirc ulating pump, (4) five GS impingers, (5) a length

of sample line, and (6) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and a

calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first impinger was fill ed with 150 mL of 0.1N KOH, the

next two were filled with 75 mL of 0.1 N KOH, the fourth was empty, and the last impinger

contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desi ccant. A schematic drawing of the Method 0061

sampling train is provided as Figure 6.

3.6 HF and HCl Concentratio ns and Emission Rates

Measurement of hydrogen halide co ncentrations and emission rates were conducted using the

procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appe ndix A, Method 26A. The Method 26A sampling train consisted

of: (1) a heated borosilicate or qu artz probe liner; (2) a heated bor osilicate or quartz glass filter

holder containing a pre-weighed 110-mm diameter washed quartz filter with Teflon filter

support; (3) a set of three Gr eensburg-Smith (GS) impingers each containing 100 ml of 0.1

Normal Sulfuric Acid (0.1 N H 2 

## SO 4 

## ), (4) a modified GS impinger containing a known weight of

silica gel desiccant; (5) a length of sample line, and (6) a Nutech control case equipped with a

pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Fi gure 7 provides an illustration of the Method 26A

sample train.

3.7 CO and COS Concentrations and Emission Rates

Measurement of CO and COS concentrations and emission rates were conducted using the

procedures of 40 CFR 63, Appe ndix A, Method 318. Stack exhaus t gas was continually purging

through the sampling system and the Fourier Tran sform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometer. The

sample gas was extracted from the stack using a heated, stainless steel probe, maintained at

191 ° C. A heated filter box (191 ° C) connected the probe to the filter assembly and to a heated

## Isolatek International BTEC Project No. 10-3990.16

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 6, 2010 5 

## transfer line. A 0.1 μ glass filter was used for particulate matter removal. A heated, diaphragm

pump was used to pull the sample from the stack. The expected flow rate is 8 to 10 liters per

minute.

The heated transfer line, held at 191 ° C, connected the probe/filter assembly to the FTIR. The

FTIR was equipped with a temperature-controll ed, 5.11 meter multipass gas cell maintained at

191 ° C. Gas flows and sampling system pressu res were monitored using a rotometer and

pressure transducer.

FTIR data was collected using an MKS MultiG as 2030 FTIR spectrometer. All data was

collected at 0.5cm -1 

## resolution. Each sample spectrum wa s derived from the co-addition of 60

scans, with a new data point generated every one minute. Figure 8 provides an illustration of the

Method 318 sample train.

## Isolatek International BTEC Project No. 10-3990.16

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 6, 2010 1 

## 4.0 Test Results

The overall results of the emissions te st program are summarized by Table 2.

Table 2

Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Source Test

Date(s) Pollutant MDL

used Emission

Rate

(lbs/hour) Emission

Rate

(lbs/ton) Emission

Rate

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM 2.5 

## < 1.0E-01 1.3E-02 8.1E-01

Organic

Condensible PM 2.5 

## 5.7E-01 7.9E-02 4.5E+00

Inorganic

Condensible PM 2.5 

## 2.0E+00 2.6E-01 1.6E+01 Cupola

Exhaust October 26

& 27, 2010

Total PM 2.5 

## < 2.7E+00 3.5E-01 2.1E+01

Filterable

Particulate < 3.4E-01 4.1E-02 2.7E+00

Antimony < 9.2E-05 1.1E-05 7.3E-04

Arsenic 1.4E-04 1.7E-05 1.1E-03

Beryllium < 1.5E-05 1.8E-06 1.2E-04

Cadmium 3.2E-05 3.6E-06 2.5E-04

Chromium 5.2E-05 6.0E-06 4.1E-04

Cobalt 3.2E-05 3.8E-06 2.5E-04

Lead 5.7E-04 6.8E-05 4.5E-03

Manganese 3.1E-03 3.7E-04 2.5E-02

Nickel < 8.1E-05 9.5E-06 6.4E-04 Cupola

Exhaust October 27

& 28, 2010

Selenium 3.3E-03 4.0E-04 2.6E-02

Cupola

Exhaust October 26,

2010 Mercury 2.5E-04 4.0E-06 2.5E-04

Cupola

Exhaust October 27

& 28, 2010 Hexavalent

Chromium < 1.4E-05 1.7E-06 1.1E-04

Hydrogen

Chloride 5.4E-02 6.5E-03 4.2E-01 Cupola

Exhaust October 27,

2010 Hydrogen

Fluoride 6.1E-02 7.2E-03 4.7E-01

Carbon Monoxide 1.9E+03 2.8E+02 1.5E+04 Cupola

Exhaust 10/26/2010 Carbonyl Sulfide 1.9E+01 2.7E+00 6.8E+01

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

## because exhaust from the

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

## ).

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the an alytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the

sample fractions.

## Isolatek International BTEC Project No. 10-3990.16

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 6, 2010 1 

## Detailed results for individual emission test run are summarized in Appendix A. Process

production data is included in Appendix B. Fi eld and computer-generated data sheets are

included in Appendix C. Appendix D includes calibration documents and Appendix E includes

laboratory analytical reports. Appendix F includes the Method 318 analytical report.

Limitations

The information and opinions rendered in this report are exclusively for use by NAIMA and/or

Isolatek International. BTEC will not distribu te or publish this report without NAIMA’s consent

except as required by law or court order. BTEC accepts responsibility for the competent

performance of its duties in executing the assign ment and preparing reports in accordance with

the normal standards of the profession, but di sclaims any responsibil ity for consequential

damages.

This report was prepared by:

David Center

Staff Environmental Engineer

This report was reviewed by:

Randal J. Tysar

Senior Environmental Engineer

# FIGURES

### diameter = 40"

Points Distance "

12 0.8

11 2.7

10 4.7

9 7.1

8 10.0

7 14.2

6 25.8

5 30.0

4 32.9

3 35.3

2 37.3

1 39.2



## Figure 1

Site:

Isolatek International

Huntington, Indiana

Cupola Baghouse BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan Not to Scale > 14.5"

> 58"

### Bags Samples

to analyzers



## Figure 2

Site:

USEPA Method 3A

Isolatek International

Huntington, Indiana

Cupolas BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Data Acquisition System



### Calibration Gases

(Fed to Probe Tip) Environics Gas

Dilution System M&C Model 100-L

O 2 

### Analyzer CAI Series 600

CO 2 

### Analyzer pump tedlar

bagFigure 3Site:USEPA OTM27/28Isolatek InternationalHuntington, IndianaCupolasBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 Wolcott Ferndale,Michigan**Pump Silica gel** **Heated Filter Box S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple** **Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle Meter Rig** **Temp. Probe** **Filter On** **Off -** **+ 00:00** **1 2 3 4 5 45mm Filter Housing** **Filter Holder W/ Teflon Filter Verticle Condenser** **Pot Belly Impinger 100 mL DI H** **2 O** Figure No. 4Site:USEPA Method 5/29Isolatek InternationalHuntington, IndianaBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, MichiganPumpHeated Filter BoxS-type pitot w/ thermocoupleHeated probe with glass liner & nozzleMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5100 mL 5% HNO3 / 10% H2O2 solutionEmptySilica GelFigure 5Site:USEPA Method 30B Sampling TrainIsolatek InternationalHuntington, IndianaCupola BaghouseBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, Michigan 48220Knock outPumpTemperature sensorMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Sample LineDessicantMercuryTrapProbeFigure 6Site:USEPA Method 0061Isolatek InternationalHuntington, IndianaCupola BaghouseBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, MichiganPumpMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5150 mL 0.1 N KOHEmptySilica GelPerastaltic pumpTeflon tee75 mL 0.1 N KOHEmptyFigure 7Site:USEPA Method 26A Sampling TrainIsolatek InternationalHuntington, IndianaCupola BaghouseBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 Wolcott Ferndale,MichiganPumpHeated Filter BoxS-type pitot w/ thermocoupleHeated probe with glass linerMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Empty100 mL 0.1N H2SO4Silica Gel

### heated sample line



## Figure 8

Site:

USEPA Method 318

Isolatek International

Huntington, Indiana

Cupolas BT Environmental Consulting,

Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Data Acquisition System



### Calibration and Tracer Gases

(Fed to Probe Tip) MKS MultiGas 2030

FTIR spectrometer

# APPENDIX A

Detailed Test Run Results

### Plant Job #

Location OTM27/OTM 28 Testing

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/26/2010 10/26/2010 10/27/2010

Start Run Start Time 8:10:00 13:25:00 10:40:00

Run Finish Time 12:56:14 17:37:14 14:15:52

Net Traversing Points 16 16 16



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 211.51 211.13 210.4 211



### D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125



### C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.003 1.003 0.994 1.000



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.41 29.41 29.74 29.52



### Δ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 0.33 0.33 0.39 0.35



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 84.080 83.290 81.270 82.880



### t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 81.13 80.59 70.72 77.48



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 80.952 80.269 79.962 80.394



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 38 40 33 37.0



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 1.79 1.88 1.55 1.74



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 2.2 2.3 1.9 2.1



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.978 0.977 0.981 0.979



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 2.90 2.8 2.2 2.6



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 18.1 17.4 18.5 18.0



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79 79.8 79.3 79.4



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.19 29.14 29.09 29.14



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.95 28.89 28.88 28.91



### P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -1.20 -1.20 -1.20 -1.20



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.32 29.32 29.65 29.43



### t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 221 229 205 218



### Δ P

avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 1.806 1.800 1.788 1.798



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 86.4 86.9 84.6 85.9



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 33,580 33,293 34,113 33,662



### Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 45,146 45,391 44,191 44,910



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 116.5 116.7 113.9 115.7



### W

p Production, tons glass per hour



### W Filterable PM 2.5 Catch Weight, mg 1.62 1.76 2.18 1.85



### C mg/dscm Filterable PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 7.1E-01 7.7E-01 9.6E-01 8.1E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Filterable PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Filterable PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 8.9E-02 9.7E-02 1.2E-01 1.0E-01



### E lb/ton product Filterable PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Organic Condensible PM 2.5 Catch Weight, mg 13 14 4 10.3



### C mg/dscm Organic Condensible PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 5.7E+00 6.2E+00 1.8E+00 4.5E+00



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Organic Condensible PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Organic Condensible PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 7.1E-01 7.7E-01 2.3E-01 5.7E-01



### E lb/ton product Organic Condensible PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 Catch Weight, mg 28 42 38 36



### C mg/dscm Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 1.2E+01 1.8E+01 1.7E+01 1.6E+01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.5E+00 2.3E+00 2.1E+00 2.0E+00



### E lb/ton product Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Total PM 2.5 Catch Weight, mg 42.6 57.8 44.2 48.2



### C mg/dscm Total PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 1.9E+01 2.5E+01 2.0E+01 2.1E+01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Total PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Total PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.3E+00 3.2E+00 2.5E+00 2.7E+00



### E lb/ton product Total PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

### 10-3990.16 Isolatek International

Huntington, IN Cupola Exhaust Source

MY PersonnelPlant Job #

Location Method 29 Metals

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 3 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/27/2010 10/28/2010 10-28-10

Start Run Start Time 15:14:00 8:11:00 11:54:00

Run Finish Time 18:33:00 11:49:00 16:32:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 192 192 192 192

D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.190

C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.003 1.003 1.003 1.003

P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.74 30.02 30.02 29.93

Δ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.85 1.88 2.03 1.92

V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 146.132 143.712 148.140 145.995

t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 85.33 64.00 65.32 71.55

V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 141.705 146.399 150.585 146.230

V l c Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 40 43 49 44.0

V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 1.88 2.02 2.31 2.07

% H 2 O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.4

M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.987 0.986 0.985 0.986

%CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 3.3 2.4 1.6 2.4

%O 2 Oxygen, % 17.0 18 19 18.0

% CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.7 79.6 79.4 79.6

M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.21 29.10 29.02 29.11

M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.06 28.95 28.85 28.95

P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -1.2 -1.20 -1.20 -1.20

P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.65 29.93 29.93 29.84

t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 199 181 173 184

Δ P

av g Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 1.608 1.650 1.720 1.659

v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 79.6 79.3 80.6 79.8

A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7

Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 32,661 33,751 34,668 33,693

Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 41,677 41,496 42,199 41,791

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.2 100.2 100.2 100.2

W

p Production, tons glass per hour

W Particulate Method 5 Catch Weight, mg 11.8 5.0 16.4 11.1

C

m g /dscm Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm 2.9 1.2 3.8 2.7

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/hr 0.36 0.15 0.50 0.34

E lb/ton product Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Antimony Catch Weight, μg 2.0 3.7 3.4 3.0

C

m g /dscm Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm 5.0E-04 8.9E-04 8.0E-04 7.3E-04

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/hr 6.1E-05 1.1E-04 1.0E-04 9.2E-05

E lb/ton product Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Arsenic Catch Weight, μg 3.5 5.1 5.5 4.7

C

m g /dscm Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm 8.7E-04 1.2E-03 1.3E-03 1.1E-03

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.1E-04 1.5E-04 1.7E-04 1.4E-04

E lb/ton product Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Beryllium Catch Weight, μg 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

C

m g /dscm Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.2E-04 1.2E-04 1.2E-04 1.2E-04

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.5E-05 1.5E-05 1.5E-05 1.5E-05

E lb/ton product Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cadmium Catch Weight, μg 1.5 0.75 0.82 1.0

C

m g /dscm Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm 3.8E-04 1.8E-04 1.9E-04 2.5E-04

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.7E-05 2.3E-05 2.5E-05 3.2E-05

E lb/ton product Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Chromium Catch Weight, μg 1.86 1.56 1.66 1.7

C

m g /dscm Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 4.6E-04 3.8E-04 3.9E-04 4.1E-04

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 5.7E-05 4.8E-05 5.1E-05 5.2E-05

E lb/ton product Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cobalt Catch Weight, μg 0.74 1.17 1.23 1.0

C

m g /dscm Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm 1.8E-04 2.8E-04 2.9E-04 2.5E-04

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.3E-05 3.6E-05 3.7E-05 3.2E-05

E lb/ton product Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Lead Catch Weight, μg 10 23 23 18.7

C

m g /dscm Lead Concentration, mg/dscm 2.5E-03 5.5E-03 5.4E-03 4.5E-03

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Lead Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Lead Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.0E-04 7.0E-04 7.0E-04 5.7E-04

E lb/ton product Lead Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Manganese Catch Weight, μg 99.9 79.6 125.9 101.8

C

m g /dscm Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm 2.5E-02 1.9E-02 3.0E-02 2.5E-02

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.0E-03 2.4E-03 3.8E-03 3.1E-03

E lb/ton product Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Nickel Catch Weight, μg 2.5 3.0 2.5 2.7

C

m g /dscm Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm 6.2E-04 7.2E-04 5.9E-04 6.4E-04

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/hr 7.6E-05 9.1E-05 7.6E-05 8.1E-05

E lb/ton product Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Selenium Catch Weight, μg 86.7 87.0 153 108.9

C

m g /dscm Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm 2.2E-02 2.1E-02 3.6E-02 2.6E-02

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.6E-03 2.7E-03 4.7E-03 3.3E-03

E lb/ton product Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 10-3990.16 Isolatek

Huntington, IN Cupola Exhaust Source

TS PersonnelM30B Mercury TestingCompany Name Plant Location CityPlant Location State Source Name Source IDGuardian Fiberglass Albion Michigan Electric Melt Furnaces SVMELT6,7,9Please note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "S"Measured Value(mg/dscm)CorrectedConcentration(mg/dscm at 7% O2)Basis (Wet or Dry)Test Method Used(EPA Method 30B)Data Flag (ADL,BDL, DDL)Test MethodCommentsCalculatedEmission Rate(lb/hr)1 10/26/2010 8:30 10/26/2010 11:41 1.88E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 2.36E-052 10/26/2010 11:53 10/26/2010 11:53 1.49E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 1.87E-053 10/26/2010 14:35 10/26/2010 16:40 4.00E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 4.99E-05Test End TimeRun Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateTotal Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test ResultsPage 1 of 312/6/2010M30B Mercury TestingQA/QC DocumentationProcessProduction Rate(tons glass/hr)CalculatedEmission Rate(lb/ton)Trap IDSection 1Mass (ng)Section 2Mass (ng)TotalMass (ng)InitialSpike(ng)Total Non-Spike (ng)SampleVolume(dscm)VolumeDifference (%)Volume Diff.LimitBreaktrough(%)BreaktroughLimit2.2 2.9 18.1 45146 33580 216.04R1, A 26.2 0.84 27.04 0 27.04 0.14 0% 32.2 2.9 18.1 45146 33580 208.54R2, A 20.4 0.94 21.34 0 21.34 0.14 0% 52.3 2.8 17.4 45391 33293 232.50R3, A 55.4 2.45 57.85 0 57.85 0.14 0% 4Flue GasTemperature (F)Other Supporting InformationFlue GasMoisture(%)Flue GasO2(%)Flue GasCO2(%)Flue Gas FlowRate (dscfm)Flue GasFlow Rate(acfm)Trap #1≤20% of fieldrecovery test≤10% of Section1 Hg mass forHg conc. >1μg/dscm: or≤20% of Section1 for Hg conc.≤1μg/dscmPage 2 of 312/6/2010M30B Mercury TestingConcentration(μg/dscm)Trap IDSection 1MassSection 2MassTotalMassInitialSpikeTotal Non-SpikeSampleVolumeVolumeDifference (%)Volume Diff.LimitBreaktrough (%)BreaktroughLimitConcentration(μg/dscm)Abs. diff. RD (%) LimitCrecR (%) by RunRavg(%)Limit0.19R1, B 46.7 0.78 47.48 20 27.48 0.14 0% 20.30.1 28 0.1424 1020.15R2, B 31.7 1.02 32.72 10 22.72 0.14 0% 30.20.1 21 0.0790 1130.40R3, B 74.8 3.12 77.92 20 57.92 0.14 0% 40.50.1 15 0.1386 100105AverageRecovery,between 85 and115%Trap #2Paired Trap Agreement (RD) Measured Spike Recovery ( R )≤20% of fieldrecovery test≤10% of Section1 Hg mass for Hgconc. >1μg/dscm: or≤20% of Section 1for Hg conc.≤1μg/dscm≥10 % RD massfor Hg conc. >1μg/dscm: or≤20% RD or≤0.2μg/dscm abs.diff.for Hg conc.≤1μg/dscmPage 3 of 312/6/2010

## Plant Job #

Location Hex Chrome Testing - 0061

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/27/2010 10/28/2010 10/28/10

Start Run Start Time 15:14:00 8:11:00 11:54:00

Run Finish Time 18:33:00 11:30:00 16:32:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 192 192 192 192



### D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.175 0.175 0.175 0.175



### C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.994 0.994 0.994 0.994



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.74 30.02 30.02 29.93



### Δ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.26 1.30 1.34 1.30



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 124.700 123.750 124.960 124.470



### t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 77.73 57.13 58.29 64.38



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 121.352 126.415 127.376 125.048



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 49 75 74 66.0



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 2.31 3.53 3.48 3.11



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 1.9 2.7 2.7 2.4



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.981 0.973 0.973 0.976



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 3.3 2.4 1.6 2.4



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 17.0 18 19.0 18.0



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.7 79.6 79.4 79.6



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.21 29.10 29.02 29.11



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.00 28.80 28.72 28.84



### P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H

2 O -1.2 -1.20 -1.20 -1.20



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.65 29.93 29.93 29.84



### t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 195 176 170 181



### Δ P

avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 1.619 1.690 1.694 1.667



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 79.7 80.1 79.8 79.9



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 32,646 33,887 34,035 33,523



### Q

a w Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 41,655 41,951 41,725 41,777



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.0 101.5 101.5 101.4



### W

p Production, tons glass per hour



### W Hexavalent Chromium Catch Weight, μg 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4



### C mg/dscm Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.2E-04 1.1E-04 1.1E-04 1.1E-04



### C mg/dscm@7%O 2 Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/h r Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.4E-05 1.4E-05 1.4E-05 1.4E-05



### E lb/ton product Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.16 Isolatek

Huntington, IN Cupola Exhaust Source

MY Personnel

## Plant Job #

Location HCl and HF Testing - 26A

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/27/2010 10/27/2010 10-27-10

Start Run Start Time 10:01:00 11:19:00 13:13:00

Run Finish Time 11:10:00 13:04:00 14:55:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 64 64 64 64



### D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.196 0.196 0.196 0.196



### C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.003 1.003 1.003 1.003



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.74 29.74 29.74 29.74



### Δ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 2.29 2.28 2.31 2.29



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 52.282 52.545 53.979 52.935



### t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 71.84 79.06 83.81 78.24



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 52.039 51.600 52.549 52.063



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 19 18 17 18.0



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 0.89 0.85 0.80 0.85



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.6



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.983 0.984 0.985 0.984



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 2.2 2.2 2.7 2.4



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 18.5 18.5 17.7 18.2



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.3 79.3 79.6 79.4



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.09 29.09 29.14 29.11



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.90 28.91 28.97 28.93



### P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -1.2 -1.20 -1.20 -1.20



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.65 29.65 29.65 29.65



### t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 194 208 201 201



### Δ P

avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 1.794 1.800 1.797 1.797



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 84.0 85.0 84.4 84.5



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 34,598 34,305 34,459 34,454



### Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 43,969 44,530 44,218 44,239



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 98.0 97.9 99.3 98.4



### W

p Production, tons glass per hour



### W HCl Catch Weight, μg 550 810 500 620



### C mg/dscm HCl Concentration, mg/dscm 3.7E-01 5.5E-01 3.4E-01 4.2E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 HCl Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr HCl Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.8E-02 7.1E-02 4.3E-02 5.4E-02



### E lb/ton product HCl Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W HF Catch Weight, μg 510 700 870 693



### C mg/dscm HF Concentration, mg/dscm 3.5E-01 4.8E-01 5.8E-01 4.7E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 HF Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr HF Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.5E-02 6.2E-02 7.5E-02 6.1E-02



### E lb/ton product HF Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.16 Isolatek

Huntington, IN Cupola Ex Source

TS PersonnelCompany Name Plant Location City Plant Location State Source Name Source IDIsolatek Internation Huntington Indiana Cupolas 1 and 2 Cupolas 1 and 2Measured Value(ppm)CorrectedConcentration(ppmvd at 7% O2)Basis (Wet or Dry)Test Method Used (EPAMethod 318)Data Flag (ADL,BDL, DDL)Test MethodCommentsRun 1 10/26/2010 9:48 10/26/2010 10:48 12489 NA wet Method 318 ADL 1863.91 14,491 2.2 2.9 18.1 45146 34335 33580 221Stack information is fromOTM 27/28 Run 1 (8:10-12:56)Run 2 10/26/2010 11:21 10/26/2010 12:21 13003 NA wet Method 318 ADL 1933.32 15,088 2.3 2.9 17.4 45269 34206 33437 225Stack information isaverage from OTM 27/28Run 1 and Run 2Run 3 10/26/2010 12:42 10/26/2010 13:42 13704 NA wet Method 318 ADL 2029.84 15,901 2.3 2.8 18.5 45391 34077 33293 229Stack information is fromOTM 27/28 Run 2 (13:25-17:37)Flue GasFlow Rate(scfm)Other SupportingInformationCalculatedEmission Rate(lb/hr)Flue GasMoisture (%)Flue GasO2(%)Flue GasFlow Rate(acfm)Flue GasCO2(%)Flue GasFlow Rate(dscfm)Flue GasTemperature(oF)ProcessProductionRate(tons glass/hr)CalculatedEmission Rate(lb/ton)Test End TimeCarbon Monoxide Emission Test ResultsRun Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateCalculatedEmission Rate(mg/dscm)Isolatek Method 318 SheetCO Emission Data-31812/6/2010Company Name Plant Location City Plant Location State Source Name Source IDIsolatek Internation Huntington Indiana Cupolas 1 and 2 Cupolas 1 and 2Measured Value(ppm)CorrectedConcentration(ppmvd at 7% O2)Basis (Wet or Dry)Test Method Used (EPAMethod 318)Data Flag (ADL,BDL, DDL)Test Method CommentsRun 1 10/26/2010 9:48 10/26/2010 10:48 53.1 NA wet Method 318 ADL 17.00 62 2.2 2.9 18.1 45146 34335 33580 221Stack information isfrom OTM 27/28 Run 1(8:10-12:56)Run 2 10/26/2010 11:21 10/26/2010 12:21 58.1 NA wet Method 318 ADL 18.53 67 2.3 2.9 17.4 45269 34206 33437 225Stack information isaverage from OTM27/28 Run 1 and Run 2Run 3 10/26/2010 12:42 10/26/2010 13:42 64.4 NA wet Method 318 ADL 20.46 75 2.3 2.8 18.5 45391 34077 33293 229Stack information isfrom OTM 27/28 Run 2(13:25-17:37)Flue GasFlow Rate(scfm)Other SupportingInformationCalculatedEmission Rate(lb/hr)Flue GasMoisture (%)Flue GasO2(%)Flue GasCO2(%)Flue GasFlow Rate(dscfm)Flue GasFlow Rate(acfm)Flue GasTemperature(oF)ProcessProductionRate(tons glass/hr)CalculatedEmission Rate(lb/ton)Test End TimeCarbonyl Sulfide Emission Test ResultsRun Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateCalculatedEmission Rate(mg/dscm)Isolatek Method 318 SheetCOS Emission Data-31812/6/2010

# APPENDIX B

Production Data

# APPENDIX C

Field and ComputerGenerated

Data Sheets and NotesBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.16Probe #5ftEPollutantPM2.5Points/Port8Start Finish Pre PostCompanyIsolatek InternationalDGM #MB5MethodOTM27/28Total Points16LocationHuntington, INRate (cfm)0.75Run #1Time/pt (min)13.22SourceCupola ExhaustDelta ∆H@1.53Date10/26/10Time/reading13.22OperatorMYBws (%)2.16# of Ports2Total Run min211.51Filter Number Condensate Volume14Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.32Barometric29.41Silica Gel Weight Gain24DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)29.41Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-1.2Actual Dn (in)0.125O2 (%)18.10Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.33An (ft^2)0.00009CO2 (%)2.90Md29.19Stack Area (sf)8.71Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.95Act. Flow (cfm)45,146Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 80.64Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)158.6Wet Ref Flow (cfm)34,322Moisture % 2.17Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)33,580Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.80.0 13.6 8:10681.68 1.90 245 74 740.320.309 200 200 67 2713.6 26.4 8:23686.89 1.70 264 79 760.290.309 200 200 64 2626.4 40.3 8:36691.74 2.00 206 78 780.340.294 200 210 67 2540.3 53.5 8:50697.03 1.80 209 80 780.310.349 201 212 64 3453.5 66.7 9:03702.44 1.80 218 81 790.310.346 215 215 65 2366.7 79.5 9:16707.56 1.70 217 83 800.290.338 230 230 63 2279.5 92.7 9:29712.66 1.80 218 84 810.310.339 230 232 63 2192.7 105.9 9:42718.07 1.80 207 84 810.310.339 235 232 61 21105.9 119.1 11:11723.46 1.80 218 84 810.310.339 230 232 63 22119.1 132.3 11:24728.91 1.80 207 84 810.310.339 235 232 61 23132.3 145.9 11:38734.30 1.90 220 82 820.330.350 235 230 63 24145.9 159.5 11:51739.78 1.90 224 84 810.330.338 236 232 62 25159.5 172.7 12:04744.99 1.80 219 83 810.310.333 240 233 62 26172.7 185.5 12:17750.12 1.70 220 87 820.290.338 239 235 61 37185.5 198.3 12:30755.48 1.70 216 85 830.290.343 239 237 60 38198.3 211.5 12:43760.55 1.80 222 84 820.310.342 239 235 62 3211.5 12:56765.76Average:84.081.81 220.6 82.3 80.00.310.33 225 225 63 2Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.16Probe #5ftEPollutantPM2.5Points/Port8Start Finish Pre PostCompanyIsolatek InternationalDGM #MB5MethodOTM27/28Total Points160.00 @15" 0.00 @5"LocationHuntington, INRate (cfm)0.75Run #2Time/pt (min)13.2SourceCupola ExhaustDelta ∆H@1.53Date10/26/10Time/reading13.2OperatorMYBws (%)2.3# of Ports2Total Run211.1Filter Number Condensate Volume2Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.32Barometric29.41Silica Gel Weight Gain38DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)29.41Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-1.2Actual Dn (in)0.125O2 (%)17.40Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.33An (ft^2)0.00009CO2 (%)2.8Md29.14Stack Area (sf)8.71Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.89Act. Flow (cfm)45,391Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 79.96Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)158.3Wet Ref Flow (cfm)34,074Moisture % 2.30Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)33,293Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.80.0 13.6 13:25766.02 1.90 214 81 810.320.343 231 235 65 2713.6 26.8 13:52771.38 1.80 197 79 810.300.343 233 235 64 2626.8 40.7 14:06776.50 2.00 191 77 770.340.361 235 239 62 2540.7 53.9 14:35782.15 1.80 215 77 770.300.365 240 240 65 2453.9 66.7 15:03787.34 1.70 225 77 740.290.340 241 238 65 2366.7 79.5 15:16792.32 1.70 216 85 750.290.328 235 235 62 2279.5 92.4 15:29797.29 1.70 226 85 750.290.337 238 239 62 2192.4 105.6 15:42802.35 1.80 230 86 750.300.328 240 239 63 26105.6 118.4 15:52807.39 1.70 226 85 750.290.337 238 239 62 25118.4 131.6 16:05812.71 1.80 230 86 750.310.328 240 239 63 24131.6 145.2 16:19818.05 1.90 245 83 780.320.324 237 236 63 24145.2 158.7 16:32823.49 1.90 238 85 780.320.312 236 238 60 25158.7 172.3 16:45828.65 1.90 244 86 790.320.318 235 235 60 26172.3 185.1 16:58833.76 1.70 254 87 800.290.313 234 238 60 27185.1 198.3 17:11838.93 1.80 255 88 820.300.319 241 237 61 28198.3 211.1 17:24844.07 1.70 263 88 820.290.305 239 235 61 2211.1 17:37849.31Average:83.291.80 229.3 83.4 77.80.300.33 237.1 237.3 62.4 2Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.16Probe #5ftEPollutantPM2.5Points/PortStart Finish Pre PostCompanyIsolatek InternationalDGM #MB4MethodOTM27/28Total Points160.00 @15" 0.002 @8"LocationHuntington, INRate (cfm)0.75Run #3Time/pt (min)13.2SourceCupola ExhaustDelta ∆H@1.71Date10/27/10Time/reading13.2OperatorMYBws (%)1.9# of Ports2Total Run210.4Filter Number Condensate Volume9Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.65Barometric29.74Silica Gel Weight Gain24DGM Y0.994Pm (in Hg)29.74Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-1.2Actual Dn (in)0.125O2 (%)18.50Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.33An (ft^2)0.00009CO2 (%)2.2Md29.09Stack Area (sf)8.71Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.88Act. Flow (cfm)44,191Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 79.65Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)157.8Wet Ref Flow (cfm)34,776Moisture % 1.91Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)34,113Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.80.0 12.8 10:40313.72 1.70 204 61 610.330.385 230 230 64 3712.8 25.7 10:52318.43 1.70 195 64 620.330.385 232 235 58 3625.7 38.9 11:05323.18 1.80 195 65 630.350.396 235 236 59 3538.9 52.1 11:18328.12 1.80 198 69 650.350.397 235 235 63 3352.1 65.6 11:32333.18 1.90 194 70 660.370.395 235 236 61 3465.6 79.5 11:45338.41 2.00 198 72 680.390.4 237 236 60 3579.5 93.1 11:59343.83 1.90 215 73 690.370.397 235 237 61 3693.1 105.9 12:13349.02 1.70 219 74 700.330.378 236 238 63 31105.9 119.5 12:31354.00 1.90 215 73 690.370.397 235 237 61 32119.5 132.3 12:43359.01 1.70 219 74 700.330.378 236 238 63 33132.3 145.1 12:56364.09 1.70 221 73 720.330.374 235 235 65 34145.1 158.0 13:09369.19 1.70 211 76 730.330.374 236 235 63 35158.0 171.2 13:23374.36 1.80 204 77 740.350.386 235 235 64 36171.2 184.4 13:36379.55 1.80 203 77 740.350.394 237 236 64 47184.4 197.6 13:49384.81 1.80 198 78 760.350.411 235 235 66 48197.6 210.4 14:03389.95 1.70 190 79 760.330.403 237 237 67 4210.4 14:15394.99Average:81.271.79 204.9 72.2 69.30.350.39 235.1 235.7 62.625 3.2Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.16Probe #4ft - APollutantMetalsPoints/Port8Start Finish Pre PostCompanyIsolatekDGM #3Method29Total Points160.002 @15" 0.00 @8"LocationHuntington, INRate (cfm)0.75Run #3Time/pt (min)12.0SourceCupola ExhaustDelta ∆H@1.82Date10/27/10Time/reading4.0OperatorTSBws (%)1.31# of Ports2Total Run192.0Filter NumberCondensate Volume4Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.65Barometric29.74Silica Gel Weight Gain36DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)29.74Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-1.2Actual Dn (in)0.19O2 (%)17Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.33An (ft^2)0.00020CO2 (%)3.3Md29.21Stack Area (sf)8.73Est.DH(in H2O) Ms29.06Act. Flow (cfm)41,677Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 140.64Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)144.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)33,095Moisture %1.32Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)32,661Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 4.0 15:14636.35 1.60 189 81 811.821.84 250 248 63 314.0 8.0 15:18639.51 1.60 191 83 811.821.84 248 251 64 318.0 12.0 15:22642.45 1.60 190 85 811.821.85 249 248 65 3212.0 16.0 15:26645.52 1.55 188 86 811.771.79 247 251 65 3216.0 20.0 15:30648.45 1.50 185 86 811.711.74 243 249 64 3220.0 24.0 15:34651.48 1.50 186 87 811.711.74 244 250 65 3324.0 28.0 15:38654.42 1.50 184 87 821.711.74 248 251 68 3328.0 32.0 15:42657.39 1.50 188 88 821.711.74 246 247 65 3332.0 36.0 15:46660.39 1.50 188 88 821.711.74 247 250 63 3436.0 40.0 15:50663.39 1.55 189 88 821.771.8 250 250 62 3440.0 44.0 15:54666.45 1.55 191 88 821.771.8 249 251 61 3444.0 48.0 15:58669.54 1.50 187 88 821.711.74 249 250 61 3548.0 52.0 16:02672.45 1.50 186 88 821.711.74 247 250 61 3552.0 56.0 16:06675.43 1.60 187 89 831.821.86 246 251 60 3556.0 60.0 16:10678.55 1.60 185 89 831.821.86 250 250 60 3660.0 64.0 16:14681.62 1.80 184 89 832.052.09 248 249 60 3664.0 68.0 16:18684.79 1.60 181 89 831.821.86 247 250 60 3668.0 72.0 16:22687.82 1.80 183 89 832.052.1 250 251 59 3772.0 76.0 16:26691.05 1.70 185 89 831.941.98 249 253 59 3776.0 80.0 16:30694.2 1.65 191 89 831.881.92 249 249 59 3780.0 84.0 16:34697.39 1.70 197 89 831.941.98 250 250 60 3884.0 88.0 16:38700.57 1.60 196 89 831.821.86 250 251 60 3888.0 92.0 16:42703.65 1.60 201 89 831.821.86 250 249 61 3892.0 96.0 16:46706.66 1.60 204 89 831.831.86 250 251 61 3196.0 100.0 16:57709.69 1.50 202 84 831.711.74 252 247 60 31100.0 104.0 17:01712.62 1.50 224 86 831.711.74 242 250 61 31104.0 108.0 17:05715.56 1.50 231 88 831.711.73 237 252 60 32108.0 112.0 17:09718.47 1.50 234 88 831.711.73 238 249 60 32112.0 116.0 17:13721.37 1.55 233 88 831.771.78 239 249 61 32116.0 120.0 17:17724.26 1.55 229 89 831.771.78 239 247 62 33120.0 124.0 17:21727.15 1.60 229 89 831.821.84 238 248 62 33124.0 128.0 17:25730.18 1.60 224 89 831.821.83 229 253 63 33128.0 132.0 17:29733.19 1.60 221 89 831.821.83 239 251 63 34132.0 136.0 17:33736.24 1.50 215 89 831.711.72 249 253 65 34136.0 140.0 17:37739.2 1.70 212 89 831.941.94 248 250 64 34140.0 144.0 17:41742.28 1.60 210 89 831.821.83 247 250 65 35144.0 148.0 17:45745.25 1.60 208 89 831.821.83 252 253 68 35148.0 152.0 17:49748.2 1.65 204 89 831.881.89 251 252 67 35152.0 156.0 17:53751.19 1.70 203 89 831.941.94 248 252 66 36156.0 160.0 17:57754.24 1.65 198 89 831.881.89 249 250 68 36160.0 164.0 18:01757.33 1.70 197 89 831.941.94 249 250 65 36164.0 168.0 18:05760.45 1.75 196 89 831.992 247 247 64 37168.0 172.0 18:09763.66 1.70 191 89 831.941.94 250 250 67 37172.0 176.0 18:13766.82 1.70 192 89 831.941.94 250 250 66 37176.0 180.0 18:17769.93 1.75 190 89 831.992 250 249 65 38180.0 184.0 18:21773.20 1.70 191 89 831.941.95 249 250 68 38184.0 188.0 18:25776.25 1.80 190 89 832.052.06 249 250 65 38188.0 192.0 18:29779.4 1.60 190 89 831.821.83 249 250 66 3192.0 18:33782.48Average:146.131.61 199.0 88.1 82.61.831.85 247 250 63.0625 3Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.16Probe #4ft - APollutantMetalsPoints/Port8Start Finish Pre PostCompanyIsolatekDGM #3Method29Total Points160.008 @15" 0.005 @6"LocationHuntingtonRate (cfm)0.75Run #2Time/pt (min)12.0SourceCupola ExDelta ∆H@1.82Date10/28/2010Time/reading4.0OperatorTSBws (%)1.4# of Ports2Total Run192.0Filter NumberCondensate Volume17Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.93Barometric30.02Silica Gel Weight Gain26DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)30.02Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-1.2Actual Dn (in)0.19O2 (%)18Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.33An (ft^2)0.00020CO2 (%)2.4Md29.10Stack Area (sf)8.73Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.95Act. Flow (cfm)41,496Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 145.30Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)144.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)34,217Moisture %1.37Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)33,751Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 4.0 8:11782.88 1.70 184 55 551.911.88 248 250 47 314.0 8.0 8:15785.82 1.70 173 56 551.911.9 252 248 45 318.0 12.0 8:19788.83 1.80 171 57 562.032.02 250 248 42 3212.0 16.0 8:23791.84 1.70 168 59 561.911.92 250 248 42 3216.0 20.0 8:27794.75 1.80 167 61 562.032.03 251 251 42 3220.0 24.0 8:31797.83 1.70 168 62 571.911.92 250 251 43 3324.0 28.0 8:35800.88 1.70 166 63 571.911.93 250 247 43 3328.0 32.0 8:39803.93 1.75 166 64 581.971.99 247 252 44 3332.0 36.0 8:43807 1.70 166 65 581.911.94 243 251 44 3436.0 40.0 8:47810.02 1.75 169 65 581.971.99 243 251 44 3440.0 44.0 8:51813.05 1.60 167 66 591.801.83 243 245 45 3444.0 48.0 8:55816.08 1.65 170 67 591.861.88 245 251 45 3548.0 52.0 8:59819.04 1.70 173 67 601.911.94 246 248 45 3552.0 56.0 9:03822.14 1.70 175 67 601.911.94 245 251 45 3556.0 60.0 9:07825.2 1.75 172 68 601.972 247 250 45 3660.0 64.0 9:11828.30 1.60 169 68 611.801.83 244 248 46 3664.0 68.0 9:15831.42 1.75 175 68 611.972 240 249 46 3668.0 72.0 9:19834.55 1.65 171 69 611.861.89 240 251 46 3772.0 76.0 9:23837.7 1.70 171 69 611.911.94 238 250 46 3776.0 80.0 9:27840.82 1.60 170 69 621.801.83 242 251 46 3780.0 84.0 9:31843.76 1.70 170 69 621.911.95 239 249 46 3884.0 88.0 9:35846.81 1.75 168 69 621.972 244 250 47 3888.0 92.0 9:39849.96 1.65 168 69 621.861.89 242 250 47 3892.0 96.0 9:43852.96 1.70 172 69 621.921.95 245 250 47 3196.0 100.0 9:54856.00 1.80 173 62 622.032.06 250 250 48 31100.0 104.0 9:59859.18 1.70 181 66 621.911.95 246 250 49 31104.0 108.0 10:04862.25 1.85 180 68 622.082.12 248 251 48 32108.0 112.0 10:09865.28 1.70 190 69 621.911.94 250 251 49 32112.0 116.0 10:14868.33 1.65 193 69 621.861.89 249 250 50 32116.0 120.0 10:19871.31 1.80 188 69 622.032.06 253 251 50 33120.0 124.0 10:24874.44 1.70 184 70 621.911.94 248 251 51 33124.0 128.0 10:29877.46 1.65 189 70 621.861.88 251 250 51 33128.0 132.0 10:34880.56 1.60 199 70 631.801.82 249 250 51 34132.0 136.0 10:39883.50 1.60 210 70 631.801.82 252 252 51 34136.0 140.0 10:44886.4 1.60 211 71 631.801.82 248 250 51 34140.0 144.0 10:49889.53 1.60 206 71 631.801.82 248 250 51 35144.0 148.0 10:54892.46 1.50 207 71 631.691.7 250 251 52 35148.0 152.0 10:59895.22 1.40 204 69 631.581.59 249 250 51 35152.0 156.0 11:04898.02 1.50 202 69 631.691.7 250 250 51 36156.0 160.0 11:09900.86 1.50 201 69 631.691.7 248 250 51 36160.0 164.0 11:14903.53 1.50 198 69 631.691.7 251 249 51 36164.0 168.0 11:19906.52 1.55 191 70 631.741.75 251 251 51 37168.0 172.0 11:24909.40 1.55 187 70 631.741.75 251 250 51 37172.0 176.0 11:29912.22 1.55 182 69 631.741.75 249 249 51 37176.0 180.0 11:34915.06 1.50 176 70 631.691.7 250 250 51 38180.0 184.0 11:39917.96 1.60 180 70 631.801.81 250 248 51 38184.0 188.0 11:44920.91 1.50 172 70 631.691.7 249 250 51 38188.0 192.0 11:49923.75 1.50 174 70 631.691.7 249 251 52 3192.0 11:30926.59Average:143.711.65 180.6 67.1 60.91.861.88 247 250 47.75 3Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.16Probe #4ft - APollutantMetalsPoints/Port8Start Finish Pre PostCompanyIsolatekDGM #3Method29Total Points160.00 @15" 0.00 @6"LocationHuntingtonRate (cfm)0.75Run #3Time/pt (min)12.0SourceCupola ExhaustDelta ∆H@1.82Date10-28-10Time/reading4.0OperatorTSBws (%)1.5# of Ports2Total Run192.0Filter NumberCondensate Volume24Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.93Barometric30.02Silica Gel Weight Gain25DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)30.02Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-1.2Actual Dn (in)0.19O2 (%)19Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.33An (ft^2)0.00020CO2 (%)1.6Md29.02Stack Area (sf)8.73Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.85Act. Flow (cfm)42,199Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 149.40Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)144.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)35,199Moisture %1.52Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)34,668Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 4.0 11:54926.81 1.60 145 61 611.821.91 250 257 51 314.0 8.0 11:59929.83 1.65 144 62 611.881.97 248 254 49 318.0 12.0 12:04932.93 1.70 143 63 611.932.03 244 248 46 3212.0 16.0 12:09936.06 1.65 139 65 611.881.98 250 254 44 3216.0 20.0 12:14939.11 1.70 136 66 611.932.04 250 250 43 3220.0 24.0 12:19942.19 1.70 135 67 611.932.05 252 250 43 3324.0 28.0 12:24945.35 1.70 133 68 611.932.05 249 255 43 3328.0 32.0 12:29948.51 1.75 131 68 621.992.12 250 249 43 3332.0 36.0 12:34951.67 1.70 129 69 621.932.06 251 250 43 3436.0 40.0 12:39954.87 1.70 128 69 621.932.07 250 250 43 3440.0 44.0 12:44957.92 1.70 127 69 621.932.07 249 249 43 3444.0 48.0 13:59961.01 1.70 127 69 621.932.07 246 249 43 3548.0 52.0 14:03964.16 1.80 148 59 582.052.19 249 251 47 3552.0 56.0 14:07967.36 1.70 156 61 581.932.06 248 251 43 3556.0 60.0 14:11970.58 1.65 166 63 591.881.99 250 248 43 3660.0 64.0 14:15973.60 1.80 175 64 592.052.17 251 251 43 3664.0 68.0 14:19976.79 1.80 174 65 592.052.16 249 248 44 3668.0 72.0 14:23979.98 1.85 176 67 602.112.21 249 252 44 3772.0 76.0 14:27983.2 1.85 175 68 602.112.21 250 251 44 3776.0 80.0 14:31986.45 1.90 172 68 612.162.26 251 251 45 3780.0 84.0 14:35989.7 1.90 177 69 612.162.26 250 251 45 3884.0 88.0 14:39992.96 1.90 178 69 622.162.25 250 251 45 3888.0 92.0 14:43996.19 1.80 177 70 622.052.13 250 250 46 3892.0 96.0 14:47999.41 1.80 183 70 622.052.13 251 249 46 3196.0 100.0 14:561002.45 1.80 192 64 632.052.12 244 251 48 31100.0 104.0 15:001005.32 1.75 191 68 631.992.06 250 249 48 31104.0 108.0 15:041008.39 1.75 188 70 631.992.05 251 249 45 32108.0 112.0 15:081011.55 1.80 187 70 632.052.11 250 250 45 32112.0 116.0 15:121014.68 1.60 189 70 631.821.87 250 250 45 32116.0 120.0 15:161017.67 1.70 198 71 641.931.99 251 251 46 33120.0 124.0 15:201020.69 1.70 199 71 641.931.98 249 251 46 33124.0 128.0 15:241023.76 1.60 201 71 641.821.86 248 249 46 33128.0 132.0 15:281026.73 1.55 215 71 641.761.8 251 247 46 34132.0 136.0 15:321029.65 1.60 222 71 641.821.85 251 249 46 34136.0 140.0 15:361032.59 1.55 219 71 641.761.79 250 249 47 34140.0 144.0 15:401035.43 1.60 220 71 641.821.85 250 252 47 35144.0 148.0 15:441038.33 1.60 216 71 641.821.84 249 251 46 35148.0 152.0 15:481041.25 1.70 207 71 641.931.95 250 247 47 35152.0 156.0 15:521044.28 1.80 196 71 642.052.07 250 249 47 36156.0 160.0 15:561047.31 1.80 199 71 642.052.07 250 248 47 36160.0 164.0 16:001050.39 1.80 184 71 642.052.07 250 249 47 36164.0 168.0 16:041053.48 1.80 180 71 642.052.07 248 247 47 37168.0 172.0 16:081056.58 1.60 179 71 641.821.84 251 252 47 37172.0 176.0 16:121059.55 1.70 175 71 641.931.95 250 250 46 37176.0 180.0 16:161062.62 1.70 175 71 641.931.95 248 250 47 38180.0 184.0 16:201065.72 1.70 176 71 651.931.95 247 254 46 38184.0 188.0 16:241068.8 1.75 169 71 641.992.01 248 249 47 38188.0 192.0 16:281071.96 1.60 165 71 651.821.84 250 250 47 3192.0 16:321074.95Average:148.141.72 173.3 68.3 62.31.962.03 249.4 250.3 45.5208333 3.0Leak CheckBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.16 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Isolatek DGM # 205316A Method 30B Total Points2Location Hungton INRate (L/m)1.25 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) N/ASource Cupola Ex Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 26-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator TSBws (%)1 # of Ports 2 Total Run120.0Filter Number Condensate Volume N/ACpN/APs (in Hg)29.32Barometric29.41 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/ADGM Y0.9916Pm (in Hg)#VALUE!Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-1.2Actual Dn (in)N/AO2 (%)16Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.33 An (ft^2)8.72665CO2 (%)3.0Md29.12Stack Area (sf)8.7340Est.DH(in H2O)NAMs29.01Act. Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)150.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)#VALUE!Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#VALUE!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempA B A B A B A B A B A B A B8:30 0.0 268 243 255 1.2 1.2 7 5 0.00 0 73 75 5.422 6.3298:35 5.0 217 250 250 1.2 1.2 7 5 6.172 6.189 76 779:35* 10.0 207 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 5 12.481 12.323 77 77*process delay 15.0 212 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 18.936 18.852 78 7820.0 208 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 25.372 25.671 79 8025.0 212 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 31.675 31.841 80 8030.0 215 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 37.926 38.021 81 8135.0 214 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 44.007 44.102 81 8240.0 217 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 50.349 50.276 81 8245.0 218 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 56.427 56.271 83 8350.0 213 249 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 62.482 62.127 83 8355.0 217 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 68.723 68.682 84 8460.0 218 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 74.580 74.310 84 8465.0 213 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 81.052 81.103 84 8470.0 207 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 86.799 87.281 83 8475.0 210 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 93.121 93.582 83 8380.0 215 250 249 1.2 1.2 8 6 99.549 100.056 83 8385.0 216 250 248 1.2 1.2 8 6 106.242 106.412 83 8390.0 205 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 112.851 112.776 81 8395.0 217 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 119.323 118.911 80 83100.0 219 251 248 1.2 1.2 8 6 125.631 125.221 80 81105.0 219 248 252 1.2 1.2 8 6 131.824 131.268 81 81110.0 214 245 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 137.816 137.282 81 81115.0 214 248 251 1.2 1.2 8 6 144.127 143.648 81 8111:41 120.0 - - - - - - - 150.125 149.914 - - 5.5722 6.4791Average 120.0 216.0 249.3 250.180.83333333 81.375Volume150.125 149.9140.1502 0.1501dscm0.14 0.140.14 0.14Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading m3Pre Test Post Test Pre Test Post Test0.000 @ 15" 0.001 @ 7" 0.001 @ 15" 0.002 @ 7"Condenser Filter Temp(*F)Trap/ Probe TempBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.16 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Isolatek DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points2Location Hungton INRate (L/m)1 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) N/ASource Cupola Ex Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 26-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator TSBws (%)# of Ports 2 Total Run120.0Filter Number Condensate Volume N/ACpN/APs (in Hg)29.32Barometric29.41 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/ADGM Y0.9916Pm (in Hg)29.41Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-1.2Actual Dn (in)N/AO2 (%)18Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.33 An (ft^2)8.72665CO2 (%)2.9Md29.18Stack Area (sf)8.73Est.DH(in H2O) Ms29.18Act. Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)120.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)#VALUE!Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#VALUE!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempA B A B A B A B A B A B A B11:53 0.0 216 248 250 1.2 1.2 7 6 0.00 0 80 81 5.573 6.47955.0 209 253 246 1.2 1.2 8 6 6.43 6.318 80 8010.0 208 249 253 1.2 1.2 8 6 13.27 12.812 80 8015.0 208 252 228 1.2 1.2 8 6 19.48 18.81 80 8020.0 204 248 251 1.2 1.2 8 6 25.10 24.907 81 8125.0 205 250 249 1.2 1.2 8 6 31.13 31.203 81 8130.0 204 251 247 1.2 1.2 8 6 37.36 37.282 81 8135.0 206 250 248 1.2 1.2 8 6 43.38 43.561 81 8140.0 204 250 248 1.2 1.2 8 6 49.86 50.009 81 8145.0 209 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 56.63 56.719 81 8150.0 211 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 63.42 63.619 81 8155.0 208 248 249 1.2 1.2 8 6 70.28 69.902 81 8160.0 209 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 76.92 76.584 81 8165.0 217 250 251 1.2 1.2 8 6 83.50 83.192 81 8170.0 215 248 249 1.2 1.2 8 6 88.51 88.241 81 8175.0 212 249 248 1.2 1.2 8 6 94.22 94.181 81 8180.0 212 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 101.52 100.723 81 8185.0 211 251 249 1.2 1.2 8 6 107.34 107.122 81 8190.0 210 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 114.65 113.721 81 8195.0 202 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 119.28 118.322 81 81100.0 199 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 125.72 125.645 81 81105.0 205 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 131.57 131.582 81 81110.0 209 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 137.15 137.622 81 81115.0 212 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 142.51 143.613 81 81120.0149.124 149.5865.7223 6.6291Average 120.0 208.5 249.9 248.680.83333333 80.88Volume149.124 149.5860.1493 0.1496dscm0.14 0.140.14 0.14Trap/ Probe Temp0.005 @ 15"Pre Test Post Testo.008 @ 15"Condenser Filter Temp(*F)Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading m3Pre Test Post TestBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.16 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Isolatek DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points0Location Huntington InRate (L/m)1 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) N/ASource Cupola Ex Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 26-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator TSBws (%)1 # of Ports Total Run120.0Filter Number Condensate Volume N/ACpN/APs (in Hg)29.32Barometric29.41 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/ADGM Y Pm (in Hg)29.41Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-1.2Actual Dn (in)N/AO2 (%)18Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.33 An (ft^2)8.72665CO2 (%)2.9Md29.18Stack Area (sf)8.73Est.DH(in H2O) Ms29.07Act. Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)120.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)#VALUE!Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#VALUE!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempA B A B A B A B A B A B A B14:35 0.0 213 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 0.00 0 77 77 5.7228 6.63005.0 216 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 5.825 5.789 79 7610.0 225 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 12.765 12.481 77 7615.0 223 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 18.935 18.625 77 7720.0 223 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 25.253 24.621 77 7825.0 220 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 31.464 30.592 78 7830.0 222 249 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 37.914 37.623 79 7935.0 223 251 249 1.2 1.2 8 6 44.287 43.931 80 8040.0 225 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 50.391 50.352 81 8045.0 230 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 56.937 56.941 81 8150.0 234 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 63.167 63.211 81 8155.0 240 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 69.452 69.743 81 8160.0 240 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 75.234 76.081 82 8265.0 238 250 248 1.2 1.2 8 6 82.034 82.312 82 8215:45 port 70.0 241 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 87.669 87.954 82 8215:50 restart 75.0 236 250 251 1.2 1.2 8 6 93.698 94.261 82 8280.0 238 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 99.759 100.462 82 8285.0 234 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 106.003 106.781 82 8290.0 233 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 112.318 113.018 83 8395.0 244 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 118.622 119.413 83 83100.0 239 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 124.962 125.543 83 83105.0 244 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 131.462 131.781 84 84110.0 252 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 137.678 137.821 84 84115.0 247 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 144.220 144.121 84 8416:40 120.0150.531 150.1925.8735 6.7807Average 120.0 232.5 250.0 249.980.875 80.71Volume150.531 150.1920.1507 0.1507dscm0.14 0.140.14 0.14Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading m3Pre Test Post Test Pre Test Post Test0.002 @ 15" 0.008 @ 7" 0.004 @ 15" 0.006 @ 7"Condenser Filter Temp(*F)Trap/ Probe TempBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.16Probe #5FT EPollutantHex ChromePoints/Port8Start Finish Pre PostCompanyIsolatekDGM #MB4Method61Total Points160.01 @@ 15"0.001 @8"LocationHuntington, INRate (cfm)0.75Run #1Time/pt (min)12.0SourceCupola ExhaustDelta ∆H@1.71Date10/27/2010Time/reading4.0OperatorMYBws (%)1.87# of Ports2Total Run192.0Filter NumberCondensate Volume17Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.65Barometric29.74Silica Gel Weight Gain32DGM Y0.994Pm (in Hg)29.74Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-1.2Actual Dn (in)0.175O2 (%)17Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.33An (ft^2)0.00017CO2 (%)3.3Md29.21Stack Area (sf)8.71Est.DH(in H2O) Ms29.00Act. Flow (cfm)41,655Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 120.62Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)144.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)33,267Moisture %1.88Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)32,646Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 4.0 15:14395.73 1.70 185 76 761.291.3267 314.0 8.0 15:18398.49 1.70 185 76 751.291.3267 318.0 12.0 15:22401.24 1.60 184 78 751.211.2567 3212.0 16.0 15:26403.87 1.70 181 79 751.291.3367 3216.0 20.0 15:30406.49 1.70 184 80 751.291.3367 3220.0 24.0 15:34409.15 1.70 183 80 751.291.3367 3324.0 28.0 15:38411.84 1.70 183 81 751.291.3367 3328.0 32.0 15:42414.55 1.70 184 81 751.291.3367 3332.0 36.0 15:46417.23 1.60 184 81 751.211.2567 3436.0 40.0 15:50419.83 1.50 186 81 761.141.1764 3440.0 44.0 15:54422.35 1.60 187 81 751.211.2562 3444.0 48.0 15:58424.97 1.50 184 80 761.141.1761 3548.0 52.0 16:02427.5 1.80 183 80 751.361.4161 3552.0 56.0 16:06430.24 1.80 181 81 761.361.4159 3556.0 60.0 16:10433 1.80 182 81 761.361.4159 3660.0 64.0 16:14435.76 1.80 181 81 761.361.4159 3664.0 68.0 16:18438.51 1.50 177 80 761.141.1759 3668.0 72.0 16:22441.07 1.70 180 80 761.291.3358 3772.0 76.0 16:26443.72 1.60 181 81 761.211.2558 3776.0 80.0 16:30446.34 1.60 185 80 761.211.2558 3780.0 84.0 16:34448.96 1.60 191 80 761.211.2558 3884.0 88.0 16:38451.57 1.50 191 80 761.141.1759 3888.0 92.0 16:42454.08 1.60 197 80 761.211.2559 3892.0 96.0 16:46456.65 1.50 198 81 761.141.1761 3196.0 100.0 16:57459.16 1.60 210 76 751.211.2560 31100.0 104.0 17:01461.72 1.70 219 79 761.291.3259 31104.0 108.0 17:05464.36 1.70 222 80 761.291.3258 32108.0 112.0 17:09466.99 1.60 230 80 761.211.2457 32112.0 116.0 17:13469.59 1.60 232 80 761.211.2457 32116.0 120.0 17:17472.14 1.60 227 81 761.211.2356 33120.0 124.0 17:21474.66 1.70 226 80 761.291.3156 33124.0 128.0 17:25477.28 1.70 221 80 761.291.3156 33128.0 132.0 17:29479.91 1.80 218 81 761.361.3855 34132.0 136.0 17:33482.54 1.50 211 80 761.141.1555 34136.0 140.0 17:37485.04 1.70 210 80 761.291.355 34140.0 144.0 17:41487.66 1.70 207 81 761.291.356 35144.0 148.0 17:45490.28 1.50 202 81 751.141.1556 35148.0 152.0 17:49492.74 1.60 202 80 761.211.2357 35152.0 156.0 17:53495.3 1.60 199 80 761.211.2357 36156.0 160.0 17:57497.86 1.50 195 80 751.141.1557 36160.0 164.0 18:01500.35 1.50 193 80 751.141.1557 36164.0 168.0 18:05502.85 1.60 191 80 751.211.2358 37168.0 172.0 18:09505.41 1.50 189 80 751.141.1558 37172.0 176.0 18:13507.92 1.50 187 80 751.141.1559 37176.0 180.0 18:17510.42 1.50 186 80 751.141.1559 38180.0 184.0 18:21512.92 1.50 186 79 751.141.1561 38184.0 188.0 18:25515.43 1.50 185 79 751.141.1561 38188.0 192.0 18:29517.93 1.50 185 79 751.141.1562 3192.0 18:33520.43Average:124.701.62 195.2 79.9 75.61.231.26 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 60 3Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.16Probe #5FT EPollutantHex ChromePoints/Port8Start Finish Pre PostCompanyIsolatekDGM #MB 4Method61Total Points160.01 @ 15" 0.01 @ 6"LocationHuntington, INRate (cfm)0.75Run #2Time/pt (min)12.0SourceCupola ExhaustDelta ∆H@1.71Date10/28/2010Time/reading4.0OperatorMYBws (%)2.7# of Ports2Total Run192.0Filter NumberCondensate Volume54Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.93Barometric30.02Silica Gel Weight Gain21DGM Y0.994Pm (in Hg)30.02Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-1.2Actual Dn (in)0.175O2 (%)18Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.33An (ft^2)0.00017CO2 (%)2.4Md29.10Stack Area (sf)8.73Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.80Act. Flow (cfm)41,951Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 125.64Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)144.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)34,833Moisture %2.73Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)33,887Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 4.0 8:11522.20 1.40 168 52 511.041.0747 314.0 8.0 8:15524.62 1.40 163 53 511.041.0746 318.0 12.0 8:19526.96 1.40 160 55 521.041.0844 3212.0 16.0 8:23529.3 1.50 159 56 521.111.1643 3216.0 20.0 8:27531.72 1.50 157 57 521.111.1642 3220.0 24.0 8:31534.17 1.50 154 58 531.111.1642 3324.0 28.0 8:35536.59 1.80 154 58 531.331.442 3328.0 32.0 8:39539.29 1.70 162 59 531.261.3242 3332.0 36.0 8:43541.95 1.70 164 59 531.261.3242 3436.0 40.0 8:47544.58 1.80 164 59 531.331.442 3440.0 44.0 8:51547.22 1.70 166 60 531.261.3242 3444.0 48.0 8:55549.83 1.70 167 60 541.261.3242 3548.0 52.0 8:59552.42 1.70 170 60 541.261.3243 3552.0 56.0 9:03555.03 1.70 173 60 541.261.3243 3556.0 60.0 9:07557.64 1.80 170 60 541.331.3943 3660.0 64.0 9:11560.30 1.80 167 60 541.331.3943 3664.0 68.0 9:15562.95 1.90 171 60 551.411.4743 3668.0 72.0 9:19565.71 1.90 171 61 551.411.4743 3772.0 76.0 9:23568.47 1.80 169 61 551.331.3944 3776.0 80.0 9:27571.16 1.80 167 61 551.331.3943 3780.0 84.0 9:31573.84 1.80 169 61 551.331.3944 3884.0 88.0 9:35576.51 1.80 166 61 551.331.3943 3888.0 92.0 9:39579.2 1.80 165 60 551.331.3944 3892.0 96.0 9:43581.88 1.80 170 60 551.331.3944 3196.0 100.0 9:54584.57 1.70 170 56 551.261.3146 31100.0 104.0 9:58587.17 1.60 177 58 551.181.2445 31104.0 108.0 10:02589.7 1.70 177 59 551.261.3145 32108.0 112.0 10:06592.25 1.70 182 59 551.261.3146 32112.0 116.0 10:10594.83 1.60 190 60 551.181.2347 32116.0 120.0 10:14597.35 1.70 186 60 551.261.3147 33120.0 124.0 10:18599.94 1.60 182 61 551.181.2346 33124.0 128.0 10:22602.44 1.70 184 61 551.261.3145 33128.0 132.0 10:26604.96 1.70 195 60 551.261.3145 34132.0 136.0 10:30607.51 1.60 201 61 551.181.2345 34136.0 140.0 10:34610.01 1.70 206 61 551.261.345 34140.0 144.0 10:38612.55 1.70 202 61 561.261.346 35144.0 148.0 10:42615.09 1.60 204 61 561.181.2246 35148.0 152.0 10:46617.58 1.50 203 61 561.111.1446 35152.0 156.0 10:50620.05 1.60 198 61 561.181.2246 36156.0 160.0 10:54622.5 1.60 198 62 561.181.2246 36160.0 164.0 10:58625.05 1.70 197 61 561.261.2946 36164.0 168.0 11:02627.58 1.70 189 61 561.261.2946 37168.0 172.0 11:06630.12 1.70 187 61 561.261.2946 37172.0 176.0 11:10632.67 1.80 182 62 561.331.3746 37176.0 180.0 11:14635.31 1.80 176 61 561.331.3746 38180.0 184.0 11:18637.95 1.80 167 62 561.331.3746 38184.0 188.0 11:22640.59 1.80 166 62 561.331.3746 38188.0 192.0 11:26643.25 1.80 170 62 561.331.3746 3192.0 11:30645.95Average:123.751.69 176.1 59.7 54.61.251.30 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 44.5 3Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.16Probe #5 FT EPollutantHex ChromePoints/Port8Start Finish Pre PostCompanyIsolatekDGM #MB 4Method61Total Points160.00@ 15" 0.00 @6"LocationHuntingtonRate (cfm)0.75Run #3Time/pt (min)12.0SourceCupola ExhaustDelta ∆H@1.71Date28-Oct-10Time/reading4.0OperatorMYBws (%)2.7# of Ports2Total Run192.0Filter NumberCondensate Volume56Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.93Barometric30.02Silica Gel Weight Gain18DGM Y0.994Pm (in Hg)30.02Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-1.2Actual Dn (in)0.175O2 (%)19Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.33An (ft^2)0.00017CO2 (%)1.6Md29.02Stack Area (sf)8.71Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.72Act. Flow (cfm)41,725Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 126.59Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)144.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)34,966Moisture %2.68Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)34,035Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 4.0 11:54646.17 1.80 141 55 551.351.4448 314.0 8.0 11:59648.87 1.90 142 55 551.421.5245 318.0 12.0 12:04651.66 1.90 141 56 551.421.5242 3212.0 16.0 12:09654.45 1.90 138 57 551.421.5342 3216.0 20.0 12:14657.23 1.80 135 59 551.351.4541 3220.0 24.0 12:19659.95 1.90 133 60 551.421.5342 3324.0 28.0 12:24662.78 1.80 131 60 551.351.4641 3328.0 32.0 12:29665.57 1.90 131 61 551.421.5442 3332.0 36.0 12:34668.41 1.90 127 61 551.421.5442 3436.0 40.0 13:55671.19 1.80 126 60 551.351.4642 3440.0 44.0 13:59673.94 1.80 125 61 561.351.4742 3444.0 48.0 14:03676.79 1.70 140 54 541.271.3845 3548.0 52.0 14:07679.35 1.70 148 54 541.271.3843 3552.0 56.0 14:11682.04 1.80 153 55 541.351.4643 3556.0 60.0 14:15684.73 1.70 163 56 541.271.3743 3660.0 64.0 14:19687.34 1.70 172 57 541.271.3743 3664.0 68.0 14:23689.96 1.60 171 58 541.201.2843 3668.0 72.0 14:27692.51 1.70 172 59 541.271.3644 3772.0 76.0 14:31695.11 1.60 173 60 551.201.2844 3776.0 80.0 14:35697.67 1.70 170 60 551.271.3544 3780.0 84.0 14:39700.24 1.60 174 61 551.201.2743 3884.0 88.0 14:43702.77 1.70 175 61 561.271.3543 3888.0 92.0 14:47705.34 1.70 175 62 561.271.3544 3892.0 96.0 14:51707.93 1.70 178 62 561.281.3544 3196.0 100.0 14:56710.49 1.50 177 58 571.121.1844 31100.0 104.0 15:00712.98 1.50 186 60 561.121.1845 31104.0 108.0 15:04715.45 1.40 187 62 571.051.144 32108.0 112.0 15:08717.84 1.50 183 62 571.121.1844 32112.0 116.0 15:12720.29 1.50 184 62 571.121.1844 32116.0 120.0 15:16722.71 1.50 192 62 571.121.1744 33120.0 124.0 15:20725.16 1.50 195 62 571.121.1744 33124.0 128.0 15:24727.58 1.40 197 62 571.051.0945 33128.0 132.0 15:28729.98 1.40 209 62 571.051.0945 34132.0 136.0 15:32732.39 1.30 217 63 580.971.0145 34136.0 140.0 15:36734.71 1.50 215 62 571.121.1645 34140.0 144.0 15:40737.13 1.40 216 63 571.051.0844 35144.0 148.0 15:44739.46 1.60 213 62 581.201.2445 35148.0 152.0 15:48741.93 1.70 205 63 581.271.3145 35152.0 156.0 15:52744.42 1.80 196 63 581.351.3945 36156.0 160.0 15:56747.05 1.80 188 63 581.351.3945 36160.0 164.0 16:00749.7 1.80 181 63 581.351.3945 36164.0 168.0 16:04752.33 1.80 179 63 581.351.3845 37168.0 172.0 16:08754.97 1.80 176 63 581.351.3945 37172.0 176.0 16:12757.61 1.80 173 63 581.351.3945 37176.0 180.0 16:16760.26 1.90 173 63 581.421.4645 38180.0 184.0 16:20762.96 1.90 168 63 581.421.4645 38184.0 188.0 16:24765.7 1.90 167 63 581.421.4645 38188.0 192.0 16:28768.45 1.80 164 63 581.351.3945 3192.0 16:32771.13Average:124.961.69 170.3 60.4 56.21.271.34 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 43.9166667 3.0Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.16Probe #4ft-APollutantHCLPoints/Port8Start Finish Pre PostCompanyIsolatekDGM #3Method26ATotal Points160.001 @ 15"LocationHuntington, INRate (cfm)0.75Run #1Time/pt (min)4.0SourceCupola ExDelta ∆H@1.82Date10/27/2010Time/reading4.00.000 @ 6"OperatorTSBws (%)1.69# of Ports2Total Run64.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume7Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.65Barometric29.74Silica Gel Weight Gain12DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)29.74Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-1.2Actual Dn (in)0.196O2 (%)18.5Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.33An (ft^2)0.00021CO2 (%)2.2Md29.09Stack Area (sf)8.73Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.90Act. Flow (cfm)43,969Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 51.59Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)48.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)35,193Moisture % 1.70Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)34,598Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 4.0 10:01476.82 1.90 207 63 632.392.39 250 250 53 224.0 8.0 10:05480.15 1.90 182 67 672.392.39 253 262 59 238.0 12.0 10:09483.52 1.85 178 68 672.332.35 253 261 60 2412.0 16.0 10:13486.80 1.60 177 70 672.012.04 256 261 62 2516.0 20.0 10:17489.96 1.70 176 72 682.142.18 257 260 63 2620.0 24.0 10:21493.18 1.90 184 74 682.392.44 251 260 60 2724.0 28.0 10:25496.45 1.80 194 75 692.272.31 249 258 59 2828.0 32.0 10:29499.67 1.70 196 77 692.142.18 251 255 58 2132.0 36.0 10:38502.91 1.80 202 72 702.272.3 253 256 57 2236.0 40.0 10:42506.22 1.85 204 77 712.332.36 257 259 58 2340.0 44.0 10:46509.46 1.90 204 78 712.392.42 260 260 56 2444.0 48.0 10:50512.80 1.80 202 78 712.272.3 251 259 57 2548.0 52.0 10:54516.15 1.85 200 78 722.332.36 252 260 57 2652.0 56.0 10:58519.42 1.70 201 80 722.142.17 255 260 56 2756.0 60.0 11:02522.63 1.75 196 80 722.202.23 256 259 56 2860.0 64.0 11:06525.88 1.70 197 80 732.142.17 257 262 56 264.0 11:10529.10Average:52.281.79 193.8 74.3 69.42.262.29 254 259 57.9375 2Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.16Probe #4ft - APollutantHCLPoints/Port8Start Finish Pre PostCompanyIsolatekDGM #3Method26ATotal Points16LocationHuntingtonRate (cfm)0.75Run #2Time/pt (min)4.00.00 @ 15" 0.00 @ 7"SourceCupola ExDelta ∆H@1.82Date10/27/2010Time/reading4.0OperatorTSBws (%)1.6# of Ports2Total Run64.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume7Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.65Barometric29.74Silica Gel Weight Gain11DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)29.74Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-1.2Actual Dn (in)0.196O2 (%)18.5Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.33An (ft^2)0.00021CO2 (%)2.2Md29.09Stack Area (sf)8.73Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.91Act. Flow (cfm)44,530Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 51.16Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)48.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)34,868Moisture % 1.63Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)34,305Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 4.0 11:19529.32 1.80 202 74 732.252.27 249 252 62 324.0 8.0 11:23532.55 1.75 202 78 742.192.22 248 260 63 338.0 12.0 11:27535.78 1.85 202 80 742.312.35 249 259 63 3412.0 16.0 11:31539.18 1.90 197 82 742.372.42 253 260 63 3516.0 20.0 11:35542.58 1.85 197 83 752.312.36 248 260 62 3620.0 24.0 11:39545.81 1.80 201 83 752.252.30 249 261 62 3724.0 28.0 11:43549.12 1.75 199 84 762.192.23 249 262 62 3828.0 32.0 11:47552.31 1.70 201 84 762.122.17 248 258 62 3132.0 36.0 12:32555.54 1.80 227 77 772.252.29 245 263 63 3236.0 40.0 12:36558.78 1.85 225 78 772.312.34 251 258 64 3340.0 44.0 12:40562.06 1.75 219 81 772.192.21 253 260 61 3444.0 48.0 12:44565.27 1.70 216 83 782.122.15 248 261 60 3548.0 52.0 12:48568.47 1.75 217 84 782.192.21 251 260 60 3652.0 56.0 12:52571.68 1.90 212 85 782.372.40 248 260 62 3756.0 60.0 12:56575.09 1.85 207 87 792.312.34 252 258 61 3860.0 64.0 13:00578.45 1.80 208 87 792.252.28 249 258 63 364.0 13:04581.86Average:52.551.80 208.3 81.9 76.32.252.28 249.4 259.4 62.1 3Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-3990.16Probe #4ft - APollutantHCLPoints/Port8Start Finish Pre PostCompanyIsolatekDGM #3Method26ATotal Points16LocationHuntingtonRate (cfm)0.75Run #3Time/pt (min)4.00.00 @ 15"SourceCupola ExDelta ∆H@1.82Date10-27-10Time/reading4.00.00 @ 7"OperatorTSBws (%)1.5# of Ports2Total Run64.0Filter NumberNACondensate Volume2Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.65Barometric29.74Silica Gel Weight Gain15DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)29.74Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-1.2Actual Dn (in)0.196O2 (%)17.7Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.33An (ft^2)0.00021CO2 (%)2.7Md29.14Stack Area (sf)8.73Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.97Act. Flow (cfm)44,218Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 52.10Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)48.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)34,984Moisture % 1.51Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)34,459Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 4.0 13:13582.10 1.80 203 81 802.302.3 254 260 63 324.0 8.0 13:17585.38 1.75 204 85 802.232.24 261 261 65 338.0 12.0 13:21588.63 1.90 204 87 812.432.43 260 260 64 3412.0 16.0 13:25592.08 1.80 204 88 812.302.31 250 255 64 3516.0 20.0 13:29595.42 1.80 199 88 812.302.31 256 261 64 3620.0 24.0 13:33598.61 1.75 198 89 822.232.25 254 260 64 3724.0 28.0 13:37601.90 1.85 196 89 822.362.39 255 255 65 3828.0 32.0 13:41605.31 1.80 195 90 822.302.32 254 260 65 3132.0 36.0 14:23608.66 1.85 200 81 812.362.39 248 253 65 3236.0 40.0 14:27612.09 1.80 199 82 812.302.32 251 262 62 3340.0 44.0 14:31615.32 1.90 201 84 812.432.45 260 261 61 3444.0 48.0 14:35618.94 1.80 207 86 812.302.32 253 261 60 3548.0 52.0 14:39622.32 1.80 205 87 812.302.32 256 262 62 3652.0 56.0 14:43625.93 1.70 205 88 822.172.19 252 260 64 3756.0 60.0 14:47629.25 1.70 203 88 822.172.19 248 260 64 3860.0 64.0 14:51632.60 1.75 199 89 822.232.25 248 261 65 364.0 14:55636.08Average:53.981.80 201.4 86.4 81.32.292.31 253.8 259.5 63.5625 3.0Leak Check

# APPENDIX D

Equipment Calibration

DocumentsMETHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of timenecessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.4) Record data and information in theGREENcells, YELLOW cells are calculated.INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar)DATE: 8/30/2010 METER SERIAL #: C-5000 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 30.33 30.33 30.33 IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00%,METER PART #: MB3 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #: 1447ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATEDK' TESTEDTEMPERATURES °F ELAPSEDFACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT3) AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN) DGM∆H(1)(2)(3)YORIFICE # RUN # (AVG) (in Hg) INITIAL FINALNET (Vm)INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVGθ(in H2O) Vm(STD) Vcr(STD)YVARIATION (%)∆H@1 0.3367 16 696.810 702.190 5.380 81 80 83 80 81 81 12.00 0.62 5.33165.27010.9881.792 0.3367 16 702.190 707.570 5.380 81 83 86 81 83 83.25 12.00 0.62 5.30955.27010.9931.783 0.3367 16 707.570 712.980 5.410 82 86 88 83 84 85.25 12.00 0.62 5.31955.26530.9901.78AVG = 0.990-1.301 0.5057 16 713.050 718.340 5.290 83 88 91 85 86 87.5 8.00 1.4 5.18995.26721.0151.782 0.5057 16 718.340 724.320 5.980 85 91 93 86 87 89.25 9.00 1.4 5.84825.91471.0111.783 0.5057 16 724.320 730.320 6.0 83 93 92 87 88 90 9.00 1.4 5.85975.92561.0111.77AVG = 1.0130.911 0.8778 16 730.570 737.510 6.940 85 95 98 89 90 93 6.00 4.5 6.79146.84451.0081.902 0.8778 16 737.510 744.470 6.960 85 98 99 90 91 94.5 6.00 4.5 6.79266.84451.0081.903 0.8778 16 744.470 751.450 6.980 86 99 101 91 92 95.75 6.00 4.5 6.79686.83831.0061.90AVG = 1.0070.39AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y =1.003AVERAGE∆H@=1.82(1)=Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditionsK1=17.64oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858oK/mm Hg (Metric)Tm=Absolute DGM avg. temperature (oR - English,oK - Metric)∆H@=0.75θ∆H Vm(std)Vcr(std)Vm(2)=Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditionsTamb=Absolute ambient temperature (oR - English,oK - Metric)K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration(3)=DGM calibration factor121832ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLY COMPANYUSING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm(std), and the criticalorifice, Vcr(std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above.()2()TmHPbarVmKVmstd)6.13/(1)(∆+∗∗=TambPbarKVcrstdΘ∗∗=')()()(stdstdVmVcrY=Meter box 3 calsMETHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of timenecessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.4) Record data and information in theGREENcells, YELLOW cells are calculated.INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar)DATE:11/22/2010METER SERIAL #: C-5000 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 29.97 29.92 29.945 IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00%,METER PART #: MB3 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #: 1447ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATEDK' TESTEDTEMPERATURES °F ELAPSEDFACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT3) AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN) DGM∆H(1)(2)(3)YORIFICE # RUN # (AVG) (in Hg) INITIAL FINALNET (Vm)INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVGθ(in H2O) Vm(STD) Vcr(STD)YVARIATION (%)∆H@1 0.3367 16 126.20 131.085 4.885 66 67 69 67 67 67.5 11.00 0.62 4.90214.83720.9871.812 0.3367 16 131.085 136.430 5.345 65 69 71 67 68 68.75 12.00 0.62 5.35105.28200.9871.803 0.3367 16 136.430 141.320 4.890 66 71 72 68 69 70 11.00 0.62 4.88394.83720.9901.80AVG = 0.988-1.191 0.5057 16 141.40 147.310 5.910 66 70 74 69 70 70.75 9.00 1.5 5.90715.94421.0061.932 0.5057 16 147.310 152.560 5.250 66 74 76 70 71 72.75 8.00 1.5 5.22775.28381.0111.933 0.5057 16 152.560 157.820 5.260 66 76 76 71 71 73.5 8.00 1.5 5.23035.28381.0101.92AVG = 1.0090.901 0.8778 16 157.930 165.935 8.005 66 75 80 71 72 74.5 7.00 4.6 8.00518.02511.0031.972 0.8778 16 165.935 172.815 6.880 66 80 81 72 73 76.5 6.00 4.6 6.85446.87871.0041.963 0.8778 16 172.815 179.710 6.895 66 81 81 73 74 77.25 6.00 4.6 6.85986.87871.0031.96AVG = 1.0030.29AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y =1.000AVERAGE∆H@=1.90(1)=Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditionsK1=17.64oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858oK/mm Hg (Metric)Tm=Absolute DGM avg. temperature (oR - English,oK - Metric)∆H@=0.75θ∆H Vm(std)Vcr(std)Vm(2)=Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditionsTamb=Absolute ambient temperature (oR - English,oK - Metric)K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration(3)=DGM calibration factor121832ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLY COMPANYUSING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm(std), and the criticalorifice, Vcr(std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above.()2()TmHPbarVmKVmstd)6.13/(1)(∆+∗∗=TambPbarKVcrstdΘ∗∗=')()()(stdstdVmVcrY=Meter box 3 calsMETHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of timenecessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.4) Record data and information in theGREENcells, YELLOW cells are calculated.INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar)DATE: 8/30/2010 METER SERIAL #: CA 4 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 30.33 30.28 30.305 IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00%,METER PART #: MB4 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #: 1447ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATEDK' TESTEDTEMPERATURES °F ELAPSEDFACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT3) AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN) DGM∆H(1)(2)(3)YORIFICE # RUN # (AVG) (in Hg) INITIAL FINALNET (Vm)INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVGθ(in H2O) Vm(STD) Vcr(STD)YVARIATION (%)∆H@1 0.6665 16 200.110 205.450 5.340 82 86 84 84 83 84.25 6.00 2.3 5.27745.20700.9871.702 0.6665 16 205.450 210.740 5.290 82 84 85 83 84 84 6.00 2.3 5.23045.20700.9961.703 0.6665 16 210.740 216.070 5.330 82 85 86 84 83 84.5 6.00 2.3 5.26515.20700.9891.70AVG = 0.990-0.341 0.5057 16 216.120 221.455 5.335 83 86 88 85 85 86 8.00 1.3 5.24295.26291.0041.662 0.5057 16 221.455 226.790 5.335 83 88 90 85 86 87.25 8.00 1.3 5.23095.26291.0061.663 0.5057 16 226.790 232.145 5.355 84 88 88 87 87 87.5 8.00 1.3 5.24815.25801.0021.66AVG = 1.0041.031 0.3367 16 232.270 237.270 5.0 85 89 90 88 88 88.75 11.00 0.62 4.88104.80920.9851.782 0.3367 16 237.270 242.270 5.0 85 90 93 88 89 90 11.00 0.62 4.86994.80920.9881.783 0.3367 16 242.270 247.290 5.020 84 93 95 89 90 91.75 11.00 0.62 4.87384.81360.9881.77AVG = 0.987-0.69AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y =0.994AVERAGE∆H@=1.71(1)=Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditionsK1=17.64oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858oK/mm Hg (Metric)Tm=Absolute DGM avg. temperature (oR - English,oK - Metric)∆H@=0.75θ∆H Vm(std)Vcr(std)Vm(2)=Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditionsTamb=Absolute ambient temperature (oR - English,oK - Metric)K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration(3)=DGM calibration factor241812ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLY COMPANYUSING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm(std), and the criticalorifice, Vcr(std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above.()2()TmHPbarVmKVmstd)6.13/(1)(∆+∗∗=TambPbarKVcrstdΘ∗∗=')()()(stdstdVmVcrY=Meter box 4 calsMETHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of timenecessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.4) Record data and information in theGREENcells, YELLOW cells are calculated.INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar)DATE: 11/22/2010 METER SERIAL #: CA 4 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 29.97 29.92 29.945 IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00%,METER PART #: MB4 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #: 1447ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATEDK' TESTEDTEMPERATURES °F ELAPSEDFACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT3) AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN) DGM∆H(1)(2)(3)YORIFICE # RUN # (AVG) (in Hg) INITIAL FINALNET (Vm)INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVGθ(in H2O) Vm(STD) Vcr(STD)YVARIATION (%)∆H@1 0.6665 16 679.340 685.465 6.125 68 68 67 68 67 67.5 7.00 2.3 6.17176.08180.9851.732 0.6665 16 685.465 690.715 5.250 65 67 68 67 67 67.25 6.00 2.3 5.29265.22790.9881.723 0.6665 16 690.715 696.835 6.120 65 68 69 67 67 67.75 7.00 2.3 6.16386.09920.9901.72AVG = 0.988-0.381 0.5057 16 713.870 719.790 5.920 66 69 69 68 68 68.5 9.00 1.4 5.94085.94421.0011.812 0.5057 16 719.790 725.050 5.260 66 68 69 68 68 68.25 8.00 1.4 5.28105.28381.0011.813 0.5057 16 725.050 732.250 7.20 66 69 69 68 68 68.5 11.00 1.4 7.22537.26521.0061.81AVG = 1.0021.091 0.3367 16 696.880 702.220 5.340 66 67 68 67 67 67.25 12.00 0.61 5.36115.27700.9841.782 0.3367 16 702.220 707.120 4.90 66 68 69 67 67 67.75 11.00 0.61 4.91474.83720.9841.783 0.3367 16 707.120 713.810 6.690 66 69 70 67 68 68.5 15.00 0.61 6.70056.59620.9841.78AVG = 0.984-0.71AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y =0.991AVERAGE∆H@=1.77(1)=Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditionsK1=17.64oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858oK/mm Hg (Metric)Tm=Absolute DGM avg. temperature (oR - English,oK - Metric)∆H@=0.75θ∆H Vm(std)Vcr(std)Vm(2)=Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditionsTamb=Absolute ambient temperature (oR - English,oK - Metric)K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration(3)=DGM calibration factor241812ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLY COMPANYUSING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm(std), and the criticalorifice, Vcr(std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above.()2()TmHPbarVmKVmstd)6.13/(1)(∆+∗∗=TambPbarKVcrstdΘ∗∗=')()()(stdstdVmVcrY=Meter box 4 calsMETHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of timenecessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.4) Record data and information in theGREENcells, YELLOW cells are calculated.INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar)DATE: 9/8/2010 METER SERIAL #: 1672 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 30.67 30.67 30.67 IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00%,METER PART #: MB5 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #: 1447ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATEDK' TESTEDTEMPERATURES °F ELAPSEDFACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT3) AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN) DGM∆H(1)(2)(3)YORIFICE # RUN # (AVG) (in Hg) INITIAL FINALNET (Vm)INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVGθ(in H2O) Vm(STD) Vcr(STD)YVARIATION (%)∆H@1 0.8778 16 546.40 553.240 6.840 78 78 78 78 78 78 6.00 3.75 6.94426.96621.0031.592 0.8778 16 553.240 560.090 6.850 78 78 78 78 78 78 6.00 3.75 6.95446.96621.0021.593 0.8778 16 560.090 566.890 6.80 78 78 79 78 79 78.5 6.00 3.75 6.89726.96621.0101.59AVG = 1.0050.181 0.5057 16 564.640 570.560 5.920 78 79 81 79 79 79.5 9.00 1.2 5.95726.01981.0111.522 0.5057 16 570.560 576.480 5.920 78 81 82 79 79 80.25 9.00 1.2 5.94896.01981.0121.523 0.5057 16 576.480 582.420 5.940 79 82 84 79 80 81.25 9.00 1.2 5.95806.01421.0091.52AVG = 1.0110.751 0.3367 16 582.420 587.790 5.370 79 83 83 80 80 81.5 12.00 0.52 5.37505.33910.9931.482 0.3367 16 587.790 593.160 5.370 79 83 83 80 81 81.75 12.00 0.52 5.37255.33910.9941.483 0.3367 16 593.160 598.530 5.370 79 83 83 81 81 82 12.00 0.52 5.3705.33910.9941.48AVG = 0.994-0.93AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y =1.003AVERAGE∆H@=1.53(1)=Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditionsK1=17.64oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858oK/mm Hg (Metric)Tm=Absolute DGM avg. temperature (oR - English,oK - Metric)∆H@=0.75θ∆H Vm(std)Vcr(std)Vm(2)=Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditionsTamb=Absolute ambient temperature (oR - English,oK - Metric)K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration(3)=DGM calibration factor321812ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLY COMPANYUSING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm(std), and the criticalorifice, Vcr(std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above.()2()TmHPbarVmKVmstd)6.13/(1)(∆+∗∗=TambPbarKVcrstdΘ∗∗=')()()(stdstdVmVcrY=Meter box 5 calsMETHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of timenecessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.4) Record data and information in theGREENcells, YELLOW cells are calculated.INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar)DATE:11/23/2010METER SERIAL #: 1672 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 29.79 29.84 29.815 IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00%,METER PART #: MB5 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #: 1447ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATEDK' TESTEDTEMPERATURES °F ELAPSEDFACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT3) AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN) DGM∆H(1)(2)(3)YORIFICE # RUN # (AVG) (in Hg) INITIAL FINALNET (Vm)INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVGθ(in H2O) Vm(STD) Vcr(STD)YVARIATION (%)∆H@1 0.8778 16 885.520 893.360 7.840 62 73 77 72 72 73.5 7.00 3.8 7.80588.02091.0281.622 0.8778 16 893.360 900.080 6.720 62 77 78 72 73 75 6.00 3.8 6.67196.87501.0301.623 0.8778 16 900.080 906.820 6.740 62 78 78 73 73 75.5 6.00 3.8 6.68556.87501.0281.61AVG = 1.0291.331 0.5057 16 866.910 872.080 5.170 62 72 74 69 70 71.25 8.00 1.2 5.13645.28091.0281.542 0.5057 16 872.080 879.230 7.150 62 74 75 70 71 72.5 11.00 1.2 7.08697.26131.0251.543 0.5057 16 879.230 885.070 5.840 62 75 76 71 72 73.5 9.00 1.2 5.77765.94111.0281.53AVG = 1.0271.161 0.3367 16 850.330 856.130 5.80 62 68 69 67 68 68 13.00 0.47 5.78745.71370.9871.372 0.3367 16 856.130 861.480 5.350 62 69 71 68 69 69.25 12.00 0.47 5.32585.27420.9901.363 0.3367 16 861.480 866.830 5.350 62 71 72 69 69 70.25 12.00 0.47 5.31575.27420.9921.36AVG = 0.990-2.49AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y =1.015AVERAGE∆H@=1.51(1)=Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditionsK1=17.64oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858oK/mm Hg (Metric)Tm=Absolute DGM avg. temperature (oR - English,oK - Metric)∆H@=0.75θ∆H Vm(std)Vcr(std)Vm(2)=Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditionsTamb=Absolute ambient temperature (oR - English,oK - Metric)K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration(3)=DGM calibration factor321812ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLY COMPANYUSING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm(std), and the criticalorifice, Vcr(std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above.()2()TmHPbarVmKVmstd)6.13/(1)(∆+∗∗=TambPbarKVcrstdΘ∗∗=')()()(stdstdVmVcrY=Meter box 5 calsParameterAverageTest Run Date 10/26/2010 10/26/2010 10/26/2010 10/27/2010 10/27/2010 10/27/2010 10/28/2010 10/28/2010Test Time 9:30 - 12:30 12:30 - 15:00 15:10 - 16:20 10:00 - 12:00 12:30 - 15:00 15:20 - 17:56 8:15 - 9:23 10:00 - 14:20bag 1 bag 2 bag 3 bag 1 bag 2 bag 3 bag 1 bag 2Oxygen concentration (%) 18.1 17.3 17.5 18.5 17.6 17.0 17.9 19.0 17.7Oxygen concentration (%)(corrected as per USEPA 3A)18.1 17.4 17.5 18.5 17.7 17.0 18.0 19.0 17.8Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) 2.9 2.8 2.9 2.2 2.7 3.2 2.4 1.6 2.9Carbon Dioxide concentration (%)(corrected as per USEPA 3A)2.9 2.8 2.9 2.2 2.7 3.3 2.4 1.6 2.8CO2Correction*Co-0.01 -0.01 -0.01 -0.08 -0.08 -0.08 -0.06 -0.06Cma10.10 10.10 10.10 10.10 10.10 10.10 10.10 10.10Cm10.16 10.17 10.17 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.41 10.41O2Correction*Co-0.01 -0.03 -0.03 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.09 -0.09Cma9.97 9.97 9.97 9.97 9.97 9.97 9.97 9.97Cm9.9 9.9 9.9 10.0 10.0 10.0 9.9 9.9Co= Average of initial and final zero gasesCma=Actual concentration of the calibration gasCm= Average of initial and final calibration gasesDay 1Day 2 Day 3Cupola Exhaust Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentration Results SummaryIsolatek International - Huntington, IndianaBTEC Project No. 10-3990.16Sampling Dates: October 26 - 28, 2010

# APPENDIX E

Laboratory Analytical

Reports

### Your Project #: 10-3990.16

Site: ISOLATEK

HUNTINGTON

Your C.O.C. #: 0698

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/18



## CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F9886

Received: 2010/11/01, 14:00

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 8

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) ( 1 ) 4 2010/11/12 2010/11/12 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) ( 1 ) 4 2010/11/15 2010/11/15 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) (

2 ) 4 N/A 2010/11/12 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM

- 027

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) ( 2 ) 4 2010/11/11 2010/11/17 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM

- 027

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/11/16

Weight of DCM Received 4 N/A 2010/11/12

Weight of Water

from Impingers 4 N/A 2010/11/12

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This is a non-accredited test.

(2) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover

pages: 1

Page 1 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F9886 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/18 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H U 0 5 9 1 H

U 0 5 9 2 H

U 0 5 9 3 H

U 0 5 9 4 H

U 0 5 9 7

Sampling Date 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 2010/10/27 2010/10/26

COC Number 0698 0698 0698 0698

U n i t s TRAIN R1-OTM28 R2-OTM28 R3-OTM28 TRAIN RDL QC Batch

BLANK-OTM28 BLANK-OTM27

< 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 1.1 0.5 2327430

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg ND 0.30 2324162

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5) ml 20 1 2327434

Weight g 240 290 350 300 0.1 2326676

DCM Weight g 200 280 290 280 0.1 2326673

Inorganic Condensible PM mg 1.5 29 43 39 0.50 2329514

Organic Condensible PM mg 1.2 14 15 4.9 1.0 2326671

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H U 0 5 9 8 H

U 0 5 9 9 H

U 0 6 0 0

Sampling Date 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 2010/10/27

COC Number

U n i t s R1-OTM27 R2-OTM27 R3-OTM27 RDL QC Batch

< 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 1.8 1.5 1.6 0.5 2327430

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg ND 0.70 1.10 0.30 2324162

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5) ml 33 30 36 1 2327434

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F9886 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/18 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HU0591 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2326671 2010/11/12 2010/11/12 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2329514 2010/11/15 2010/11/15 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2326673 N/A 2010/11/12

Weight of Water

from Impingers 2326676 N/A 2010/11/12 FMO

Maxxam ID HU0592 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID R1-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2326671 2010/11/12 2010/11/12 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2329514 2010/11/15 2010/11/15 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2326673 N/A 2010/11/12

Weight of Water

from Impingers 2326676 N/A 2010/11/12 FMO

Maxxam ID HU0593 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID R2-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2326671 2010/11/12 2010/11/12 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2329514 2010/11/15 2010/11/15 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2326673 N/A 2010/11/12

Weight of Water

from Impingers 2326676 N/A 2010/11/12 FMO

Maxxam ID HU0594 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID R3-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2326671 2010/11/12 2010/11/12 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2329514 2010/11/15 2010/11/15 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2326673 N/A 2010/11/12

Weight of Water

from Impingers 2326676 N/A 2010/11/12 FMO

Maxxam ID HU0597 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2324162 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327430 2010/11/11 2010/11/17 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327434 N/A 2010/11/16 FMO

Page 3 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F9886 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/18 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HU0598 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID R1-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2324162 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327430 2010/11/11 2010/11/17 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327434 N/A 2010/11/16 FMO

Maxxam ID HU0599 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID R2-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2324162 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327430 2010/11/11 2010/11/17 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327434 N/A 2010/11/16 FMO

Maxxam ID HU0600 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID R3-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2324162 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327430 2010/11/11 2010/11/17 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327434 N/A 2010/11/16 FMO

Page 4 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F9886 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/18 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON

GENERAL

COMMENTS

Sample HU0591-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Oily material found in vial.

Sample HU0592-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Yellowish residue found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HU0593-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Yellowish residue found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HU0594-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Yellowish residue found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

RESULTS OF

ANALYSES OF

STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027): Positive result found for reagent blank

HU0597-02R, vial was observed to have a film of residue present

after evaporation.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.16

P.O. #:

Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F9886

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2326671 MGE Spiked Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/12 93 % 70

- 130

Spiked Blank DUP Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/12 90 % 70

- 130

RPD Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/12 3.4 % 20

Method Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/12 ND, RDL=1.0 mg

2327430 NUA Method Blank < 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse 2010/11/17 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2329514 MGE Method Blank Inorganic Condensible PM 2010/11/15 ND, RDL=0.50 mg

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Spiked Blank: A blank

matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Page 6 of 6

### Your Project #: 10-3990.16

Site: ISOLATEK

HUNTINGTON

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/12



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F5771

Received: 2010/11/01, 14:00

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 4

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ( 1 ) 4 2010/11/11 2010/11/11 BRL SOP-00103/ BRL EPA 6020 / M29

SOP-00102

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) ( 1 ) 4 2010/11/04 2010/11/10 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) ( 1 ) 4 N/A 2010/11/08 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315/NJATM1

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/11/10

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F5771 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/12 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H R 9 8 8 8 H

R 9 8 8 9 H

R 9 8 9 0 H

R 9 8 9 1

Sampling Date 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 2010/10/28 2010/10/28

U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 2-M5/29 3-M5/29

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 4.0 4.7 8.0 0.5 2319792

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg ND 7.80 ND 8.40 0.30 2317080

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 98 120 110 110 1 2319794

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F5771 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/12 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON



### ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H R 9 8 8 8 H

R 9 8 8 9 H

R 9 8 8 9 H

R 9 8 9 0 H

R 9 8 9 1

Sampling Date 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 2010/10/28 2010/10/28

U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RDL RUN RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 1-M5/29 2-M5/29 3-M5/29

Lab-Dup

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 0.40 ND ND 3.7 3.4 2.0 2326777

Total Arsenic (As) ug 0.52 0.40 4.0 4.0 5.6 6.0 2.0 2326777

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND ND 0.50 2326777

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug 0.17 0.10 1.71 1.59 0.92 0.99 0.50 2326777

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 1.34 0.30 3.2 3.1 2.9 3.0 1.5 2326777

Total Cobalt (Co) ug ND 0.10 0.74 0.75 1.17 1.23 0.50 2326777

Total Lead (Pb) ug 0.87 0.20 10.8 10.9 23.6 23.4 1.0 2326777

Total Manganese (Mn) ug 1.07 0.75 101 99.3 80.7 127 3.8 2326777

Total Nickel (Ni) ug ND 0.50 ND ND 3.0 ND 2.5 2326777

Total Selenium (Se) ug ND 1.0 86.7 89.6 87.0 153 5.0 2326777

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F5771 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/12 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HR9888 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID BLANK-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2326777 2010/11/11 2010/11/11 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2319792 2010/11/04 2010/11/10 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2317080 N/A 2010/11/08 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2319794 N/A 2010/11/10 NUA

Maxxam ID HR9889 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2326777 2010/11/11 2010/11/11 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2319792 2010/11/04 2010/11/10 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2317080 N/A 2010/11/08 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2319794 N/A 2010/11/10 NUA

Maxxam ID HR9889 D u p Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2326777 2010/11/11 2010/11/11 N_R

Maxxam ID HR9890 Collected 2010/10/28

Sample ID RUN 2-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2326777 2010/11/11 2010/11/11 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2319792 2010/11/04 2010/11/10 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2317080 N/A 2010/11/08 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2319794 N/A 2010/11/10 NUA

Maxxam ID HR9891 Collected 2010/10/28

Sample ID RUN 3-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2326777 2010/11/11 2010/11/11 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2319792 2010/11/04 2010/11/10 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2317080 N/A 2010/11/08 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2319794 N/A 2010/11/10 NUA

Page 4 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F5771 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/12 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Metals in Combined Train (6020): Extra 5x dilution was required for all samples except HR9888, due to the matrix (high S content)

Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample HR9889

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.16

P.O. #:

Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F5771

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2319792 NUA Method Blank Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone 2010/11/10 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2326777 N_R Matrix Spike

(HR9889) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/11 102 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HR9889) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/11 99 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/11 3.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HR9889) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/11 96 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HR9889) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/11 97 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/11 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HR9889) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/11 93 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HR9889) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/11 99 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/11 6.3 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HR9889) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/11 98 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HR9889) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/11 96 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/11 2.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HR9889) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/11 96 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HR9889) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/11 98 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/11 2.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HR9889) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/11 97 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HR9889) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/11 101 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/11 4.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HR9889) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/11 97 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HR9889) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/11 98 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/11 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HR9889) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/11 95 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HR9889) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/11 92 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/11 3.2 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HR9889) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/11 96 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HR9889) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/11 99 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/11 3.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HR9889) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/11 100 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HR9889) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/11 95 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/11 5.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/11 100 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/11 104 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/11 4.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/11 98 % 85

- 115

Page 6 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.16

P.O. #:

Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON



### Quality Assurance Report

(Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F5771

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2326777 N_R Spiked Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/11 97 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/11 1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/11 93 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/11 96 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/11 3.2 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/11 94 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/11 98 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/11 4.4 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/11 100 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/11 97 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/11 3.2 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/11 100 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/11 98 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/11 1.7 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/11 97 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/11 98 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/11 1.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/11 97 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/11 96 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/11 0.9 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/11 99 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/11 97 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/11 1.7 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/11 97 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/11 97 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/11 0.3 % 20

Method Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Page 7 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.16

P.O. #:

Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON



### Quality Assurance Report

(Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F5771

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2326777 N_R RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

RPD

- Sample/Sample

Dup Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/11 1.2 % 20

Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/11 1.3 % 20

Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/11 3.3 % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 8 of 8

### Ohio Lumex Co., Inc.

9263 Ravenna Rd., Unit A-3

Twinsburg, OH 44087

Phone: (330) 405-0837

Fax: (330) 405-0847

www.ohiolumex.com

Other



## Client Name 

# BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. Report Number BTEnvironmental110910 Report



## Date

Contact Name Phone

**Trap I.D. Test Location**  **Date Analyzed Scientist**  **Mass ng**

**Sect.1 Mass ng** 

**Sect.2 Spike** 

**Level % Spike** 

**Recovery Date(s) in** 

**Stack Comments** 

80292 Huntington, IN 11/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 26.2 0.84 10/26/2010 Run 1, Trap A

80418 Huntington, IN 11/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 46.7 0.78 20 10/26/2010 Run 1, Trap B

80310 Huntington, IN 11/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 20.4 0.94 10/26/2010 Run 2, Trap A

70635 Huntington, IN 11/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 31.7 1.02 10 10/26/2010 Run 2, Trap B

80294 Huntington, IN 11/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 55.4 2.45 10/26/2010 Run 3, Trap A

80379 Huntington, IN 11/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 74.8 3.12 20 10/26/2010 Run 3, Trap B

70928 Huntington, IN 11/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 0.60 1.38 Blank, Trap A

80450 Huntington, IN 11/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 19.9 1.89 20 Blank, Trap B

Variability +- 10% Calibration Report Available 

## (248)-548-8072

Less than .031 ng is considered "< LDL." Which is less

than the lowest detection limit. Barry Boulianne bboulianne@sbcglobal.net Matthew

Smith msmith@btecinc.com Turn - Around Time

Standard

48 hour rush



## Plant/Source 

# Isolatek Cupola Exhaust 

# Sorbent Trap Analysis Report

11/9/2010

### Your Project #: 10-3990.16

Site: ISOLATEK

HUNTINGTON

Your C.O.C. #: N/A

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/11



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F5783

Received: 2010/11/01, 14:00

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 10

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 5 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061)

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. ( 1 ) 5 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 BRL SOP-00108 EPA Method 26A

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 5 N/A 2010/11/09

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 5 N/A 2010/11/08

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F5783 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/11 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H R 9 9 5 1 H

R 9 9 5 2 H

R 9 9 5 3 H

R 9 9 5 3

Sampling Date 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 2010/10/27

COC Number N/A N/A N/A N/A

U n i t s BLANK-H2O-M26A BLANK-H2SO4-M26A RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M26A-H2SO4 1-M26A-H2SO4

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 130 140 330 1 2324479

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND 550 560 200 2324504

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND 510 510 200 2324504

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H R 9 9 5 4 H

R 9 9 5 5 H R 9 9 5 6

Sampling Date 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 2010/10/27

COC Number N/A N/A

U n i t s RUN RUN QC Batch BLANK-H2O-M0061 RDL QC Batch

2-M26A-H2SO4 3-M26A-H2SO4

Volume ml 430 420 2324479 320 1 2322925

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug ND 0.2 2318502

Hydrochloric Acid ug 810 500 2324504 200

Hydrofluoric Acid ug 700 870 2324504 200

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H R 9 9 5 7 H

R 9 9 5 8 H

R 9 9 5 8 H

R 9 9 5 9

Sampling Date 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 2010/10/28

COC Number

U n i t s BLANK-KOH-M0061 RDL RUN RUN RDL RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M0061 1-M0061 2-M0061

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 290 1 790 1 890 1 2322925

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 0.7 0.1 ND ND 2 ND 0.4 2318502

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F5783 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/11 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H R 9 9 6 0

Sampling Date 2010/10/28

COC Number

U n i t s RUN RDL QC Batch

3-M0061

Volume ml 800 1 2322925

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug ND 0.4 2318502

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F5783 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/11 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HR9951 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2324504 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2324479 N/A 2010/11/09 A_S

Maxxam ID HR9952 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID BLANK-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2324504 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2324479 N/A 2010/11/09 A_S

Maxxam ID HR9953 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID RUN 1-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2324504 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2324479 N/A 2010/11/09 A_S

Maxxam ID HR9953 D u p Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID RUN 1-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2324504 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 A_S

Maxxam ID HR9954 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID RUN 2-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2324504 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2324479 N/A 2010/11/09 A_S

Maxxam ID HR9955 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID RUN 3-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2324504 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2324479 N/A 2010/11/09 A_S

Page 4 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F5783 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/11 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HR9956 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2318502 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2322925 N/A 2010/11/08 FMO

Maxxam ID HR9957 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID BLANK-KOH-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2318502 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2322925 N/A 2010/11/08 FMO

Maxxam ID HR9958 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2318502 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2322925 N/A 2010/11/08 FMO

Maxxam ID HR9958 D u p Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2318502 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 LLE

Maxxam ID HR9959 Collected 2010/10/28

Sample ID RUN 2-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2318502 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2322925 N/A 2010/11/08 FMO

Maxxam ID HR9960 Collected 2010/10/28

Sample ID RUN 3-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2318502 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2322925 N/A 2010/11/08 FMO

Page 5 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F5783 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/11 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061): Samples are Improperly Preserved, measured pH<8.5

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 6 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.16

P.O. #:

Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F5783

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2318502 LLE Matrix Spike

(HR9958) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/03 99 % 80

- 120

Spiked Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/03 96 % 90

- 110

Method Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/03 ND, RDL=0.2 ug

RPD

- Sample/Sample

Dup Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/03 NC % 20

2324504 A_S Matrix Spike

(HR9953) Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/09 101 % 80

- 120

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/09 99 % 80

- 120

Spiked Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/09 100 % 90

- 110

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/09 102 % 90

- 110

Method Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/09 ND, RDL=200 ug

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/09 ND, RDL=200 ug

RPD

- Sample/Sample

Dup Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/09 NC % 20

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/09 NC % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 7 of 7

# APPENDIX F

Method 320 Analytical

ReportCompany Name Plant Location City Plant Location State Source Name Source ID**Isolatek International Huntington Indiana Cupolas 1 and 2 Cupolas 1 and 2** Measured Value(ppm)CorrectedConcentration(ppmvd at 7% O2)Basis (Wet or Dry)Test Method Used (EPAMethod 318)Data Flag (ADL,BDL, DDL)Test MethodComments**Run 1 10/26/2010 9:48 10/26/2010 10:48 12489 NA wet Method 318 ADL 1863.91 14,491 2.2 2.9 18.1 45146 34335 33580 221 Stack information is from** **OTM 27/28 Run 1 (8:10- 12:56)** **Run 2 10/26/2010 11:21 10/26/2010 12:21 13003 NA wet Method 318 ADL 1933.32 15,088 2.3 2.9 17.4 45269 34206 33437 225 Stack information is** **average from OTM 27/28 Run 1 and Run 2** **Run 3 10/26/2010 12:42 10/26/2010 13:42 13704 NA wet Method 318 ADL 2029.84 15,901 2.3 2.8 18.5 45391 34077 33293 229 Stack information is from** **OTM 27/28 Run 2 (13:25- 17:37)** Flue GasFlow Rate(scfm)Other SupportingInformationCalculatedEmission Rate(lb/hr)Flue GasMoisture (%)Flue GasO2(%)Flue GasFlow Rate(acfm)Flue GasCO2(%)Flue GasFlow Rate(dscfm)Flue GasTemperature(oF)ProcessProductionRate(tons glass/hr)CalculatedEmission Rate(lb/ton)Test End TimeCarbon Monoxide Emission Test ResultsRun Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateCalculatedEmission Rate(mg/dscm)**Isolatek Method 318 Sheet.xls CO Emission Data-318** **1/19/2011**Company Name Plant Location City Plant Location State Source Name Source ID**Isolatek International Huntington Indiana Cupolas 1 and 2 Cupolas 1 and 2** Measured Value(ppm)CorrectedConcentration(ppmvd at 7% O2)Basis (Wet or Dry)Test Method Used (EPAMethod 318)Data Flag (ADL,BDL, DDL)Test Method Comments**Run 1 10/26/2010 9:48 10/26/2010 10:48 53.1 NA wet Method 318 ADL 17.00 62 2.2 2.9 18.1 45146 34335 33580 221** **Stack information is from OTM 27/28 Run 1** **(8:10-12:56) Run 2 10/26/2010 11:21 10/26/2010 12:21 58.1 NA wet Method 318 ADL** **18.53 67 2.3 2.9 17.4 45269 34206 33437 225 Stack information is** **average from OTM 27/28 Run 1 and Run 2** **Run 3 10/26/2010 12:42 10/26/2010 13:42 64.4 NA wet Method 318 ADL 20.46 75 2.3 2.8 18.5 45391 34077 33293 229** **Stack information is from OTM 27/28 Run 2** **(13:25-17:37)**Flue GasFlow Rate(scfm)Other SupportingInformationCalculatedEmission Rate(lb/hr)Flue GasMoisture (%)Flue GasO2(%)Flue GasCO2(%)Flue GasFlow Rate(dscfm)Flue GasFlow Rate(acfm)Flue GasTemperature(oF)ProcessProductionRate(tons glass/hr)CalculatedEmission Rate(lb/ton)Test End TimeCarbonyl Sulfide Emission Test ResultsRun Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateCalculatedEmission Rate(mg/dscm)**Isolatek Method 318 Sheet.xls COS Emission Data-318** **1/19/2011**

## 1200 N. Fancher

· Mount Pleasant, MI 48858

· (989) 772-5088

· Fax (989) 772-5870 

# Isolatek

Huntington, Indiana

FTIR Emission Testing

October 26, 2010

Pro j ect No. 1685



# Prepared For

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

By

Phillip J. Kauppi

Chemist / FTIR Specialist

November 17, 2010

# Isolatek

Huntington, Indiana – FTIR Emission Testing

October 26, 2010

Project No. 1685



# Scope

Prism Analytical Technologi es, Inc. (PATI) was contracted by BT Environmental

Consulting (Ferndale, MI) to c onduct air testing for Isolatek (Huntington, IN). Cupola #1

emissions were tested for gaseous carbonyl sulfide (COS) and carbon monoxide (CO).

Testing was performed October 26, 2010.

Extractive Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectromet ry following EPA Method 320

was used to quantify gaseous emissions from Cupola #1. Lora Kralik (PATI) performed

data collection. Phillip Kauppi (PATI) perf ormed data validation, and report generation.



# Procedures

FTIR data were collected using an MKS MultiGas 2030 FTIR spectrometer, serial

number 016252291. An 18”, 1⁄4” diameter, stainl ess steel probe was used to direct

effluent gas from the stack to the FTIR. Th e probe was connected to a 100 ft., heated, 3/8

inch transfer line, maintained at 191 ° C. A heated filter box (191 ° C) made the connection

from the heated transfer line to the FTIR. A 0.1 μ glass filter was used for particulate

matter removal.

The FTIR was equipped with a temperatur e-controlled, 5.11 mete r multipass gas cell

maintained at 191 ° C. Gas flows and sampling system pressures were monitored using a

rotometer and pressure transducer. All data were collected at 0.5 cm -1 

## resolution. Each

spectrum was derived from the coaddition of 60 scans, with a new data point generated

every minute.

A calibration transfer standard (CTS), 100.0 ppm ethylene gas standard (Airgas, cylinder

#CC156258), was analyzed before and after the three test runs. The concentration

determined for all CTS runs were within ± 5% of the certified value of the standard. The

ethylene was passed through the entire system (system purge) to determine the sampling

system response time and to ensure that the sampling system was leak-free at the stack

location. Nitrogen was purged through the sa mpling system to confirm the system was

free of contaminants. See the FTIR QA/QC appendix for results.

Direct measurements of carbon monoxi de (The American Gas Group, cylinder

#CC56451) and ethylene gas standards were made to confirm standard concentrations.

## prism analytical technologies, inc.

Isolatek, Huntington, IN – FTIR Emission Monitoring, October 26, 2010

Project No. 1685

page 2 

## The carbon monoxide standard was passed throu gh the sampling system to determine the

response time and confirm recovery. See the FTIR QA/QC Appendix for results.

Carbon monoxide spiking was performed in am bient air to verify the ability of the

sampling system to quantitatively deliver a sample containing carbon monoxide from the

base of the probe to the FTIR. The native carbon monoxide concentrations from Cupola

#1 changed widely over short pe riods of time, thus making it making difficult, if not

impossible, to perform carbon monoxide spiking at the cupola using one FTIR. For these

reasons, carbon monoxide spiking was performed in ambient air.

Samples from ambient air were measured to determine carbon monoxide concentrations

to be used in the spike recove ry calculations. The water (H 2 

## O) concentrations of the

spiked and unspiked samples were used to determine the diluti on factor and thus

determine the spiked concentration and expected result. See the Spike Calculation below.

ܨܦ ൌ 1 െ ௑ሺ௦௣௞ሻ

௑ሺ௡௔௧௜௩௘ሻ 

## (Where X = H 2 

## O)



## ܥܵ ൌ ܨܦ כ ܵ݌݅݇݁ ሺ ݀݅ݎ ሻ ൅ ܷ݊݌ݏ݅݇݁ሺ1 െ ܨܦሻ (Sec. 9.2.3 (4) USEPA Method 320)

DF = Dilution Factor of the spike gas

Spike(dir) = Analyte concentration of the undiluted spike gas

CS = Expected concentration of the spiked samples

Unspike = Native concentration of analytes in unspiked samples

X(spk) = Concentration of spiked H 2 

## O

X(native) = Concentration of native H 2 

## O



## Analyte spikes were introduced using an instrument grade stai nless steel rotometer. The

spike target dilution ratio was 1:10 or less. All carbon monoxide spike recoveries were

within the EPA Method allowance of ±30%. See Spike Summary Appendix for results.

As part of the data validation procedure, reference spectra are manually fit to that of the

sample spectra and a concentration is determ ined. The reference spectra are scaled to

match the peak amplitude of the sample, thus providing a scale factor. The scale factor

multiplied by the reference spectra concentration is used to determine the concentration

value for the sample spectra. Sample pressure and temperature corrections are then

applied to compute the final sample concentration. The manually calculated results are

then compared with the software-generated results. The data is then validated if the two

concentrations are within ± 5% agreement. If there is a difference greater than ± 5% the

spectra are reviewed for possible spectra interferences or any other possible causes

leading to misquantified data.

## prism analytical technologies, inc.

Isolatek, Huntington, IN – FTIR Emission Monitoring, October 26, 2010

Project No. 1685

page 3 

# Results and Discussion

Detection Limits

The detection limit of each analyte was calculated following Annex A2 of ASTM

D6348-3 procedure using spectra that c ontained similar amounts of moisture.

Table 1 - FTIR Detection Limits

Analyte Carbonyl Sulfide Carbon Monoxide

Det. Lim. (ppmv wet) 1.0 0.2



## Cupola #1

Three, 3-hour test runs were performed at Cupola #1 on October 26, 2010 (See Table 2

for Test Run detail). Carbonyl sulfide a nd carbon monoxide were detected during the

three test runs. Analyte spiking was pe rformed before each run to confirm the

measurement system’s ability to delive r and quantify carbon monoxide (See FTIR

QA/QC Appendix for results). All concentra tion data were calcul ated on a wet volume

basis. The sample and data collection followed the procedures outlined in USEPA

Method 320 and PATI’s SOP 207. See the Test Run Data - Cupola #1 appendix for all

concentration data.

Table 2 – Summary of FTIR Data, Cupola #1

Test Run 1

9:48 – 10:48, 10/26/2010 Carbonyl Sulfide

(ppmv wet) Carbon Monoxide

(ppmv wet)

Minimum 15.3 5,480

Maximum 99.5 21,445

Average 53.1 12,489

Test Run 2

11:21 – 12:21, 10/26/2010 Carbonyl Sulfide

(ppmv wet) Carbon Monoxide

(ppmv wet)

Minimum 28.9 7,898

Maximum 105.2 19,629

Average 58.1 13,003

Test Run 3

12:42 – 13:42, 10/26/2010 Carbonyl Sulfide

(ppmv wet) Carbon Monoxide

(ppmv wet)

Minimum 38.3 8,406

Maximum 99.5 20,895

Average 64.4 13,704

## prism analytical technologies, inc.

Isolatek, Huntington, IN – FTIR Emission Monitoring, October 26, 2010

Project No. 1685

page 4 

## The following appendices include FTIR data and QA/QC procedures:

- Test Run Data - Cupola #1

- QA/QC Data – Cupola #1

- Gas Certificates and Field Notes

Phillip J. Kauppi (electronic) ________ Date: November 17, 2010

Phillip J. Kauppi

Chemist / FTIR Specialist

Isolatek_Prj_1685_RPT.doc

# APPENDIX

Test Run Data - Cupola #1

## Isolatek, Huntington, IN, October 26, 2010

‐ FTIR Data

‐ Test Run 1

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) FTIR Gas Cell

Temp (C) FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm)

R1_C1_000121.LAB 10/26/2010 9:47:54 43.8 9940.6 190.8 0.927

R1_C1_000122.LAB 10/26/2010 9:48:55 44.7 10074.3 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000123.LAB 10/26/2010 9:49:55 79.5 17465.9 190.8 0.927

R1_C1_000124.LAB 10/26/2010 9:50:56 99.5 20460.7 190.8 0.928

R1_C1_000125.LAB 10/26/2010 9:51:57 97.6 20466.8 190.8 0.927

R1_C1_000126.LAB 10/26/2010 9:52:58 94.9 20545.3 190.9 0.928

R1_C1_000127.LAB 10/26/2010 9:53:58 78.0 18874.3 190.9 0.928

R1_C1_000128.LAB 10/26/2010 9:54:59 52.5 15042.2 190.9 0.929

R1_C1_000129.LAB 10/26/2010 9:56:00 31.3 10550.9 190.9 0.927

R1_C1_000130.LAB 10/26/2010 9:57:01 15.3 5480.4 190.9 0.927

R1_C1_000131.LAB 10/26/2010 9:58:01 38.1 9928.2 190.9 0.927

R1_C1_000132.LAB 10/26/2010 9:59:02 55.5 11682.5 190.9 0.927

R1_C1_000133.LAB 10/26/2010 10:00:03 54.0 11105.3 190.8 0.928

R1_C1_000134.LAB 10/26/2010 10:01:03 53.8 10644.3 190.9 0.927

R1_C1_000135.LAB 10/26/2010 10:02:04 51.3 10249.8 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000136.LAB 10/26/2010 10:03:05 46.7 9883.2 190.8 0.927

R1_C1_000137.LAB 10/26/2010 10:04:06 63.0 13152.1 190.8 0.927

R1_C1_000138.LAB 10/26/2010 10:05:06 78.6 16076.5 190.8 0.928

R1_C1_000139.LAB 10/26/2010 10:06:07 68.2 14100.8 190.8 0.927

R1_C1_000140.LAB 10/26/2010 10:07:08 59.0 12819.4 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000141.LAB 10/26/2010 10:08:09 49.1 12093.4 190.8 0.927

R1_C1_000142.LAB 10/26/2010 10:09:09 42.2 11524.2 190.8 0.927

R1_C1_000143.LAB 10/26/2010 10:10:10 36.1 10975.6 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000144.LAB 10/26/2010 10:11:11 20.1 6926.3 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000145.LAB 10/26/2010 10:12:11 52.8 12387.7 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000146.LAB 10/26/2010 10:13:12 52.1 12045.7 190.9 0.927

R1_C1_000147.LAB 10/26/2010 10:14:13 55.7 12614.3 190.9 0.926

R1_C1_000148.LAB 10/26/2010 10:15:14 58.4 13129.2 190.9 0.926

R1 C1 000149 LAB 10/26/2010 10 16 15 60 8 13559 5 190 9 0 926 R1_C1_000149.LAB 10/26/2010 10:16:15 60.8 13559.5 190.9 0.926

R1_C1_000150.LAB 10/26/2010 10:17:15 60.2 13744.4 190.9 0.926

R1_C1_000151.LAB 10/26/2010 10:18:16 75.9 17285.9 190.9 0.926

R1_C1_000152.LAB 10/26/2010 10:19:17 99.2 21445.1 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000153.LAB 10/26/2010 10:20:17 93.5 19915.2 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000154.LAB 10/26/2010 10:21:18 91.9 19683.3 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000155.LAB 10/26/2010 10:22:19 67.5 16236.8 190.9 0.927

R1_C1_000156.LAB 10/26/2010 10:23:20 57.8 15317.8 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000157.LAB 10/26/2010 10:24:20 40.7 11948.2 190.8 0.925

R1_C1_000158.LAB 10/26/2010 10:25:21 24.5 8346.0 190.9 0.926

R1_C1_000159.LAB 10/26/2010 10:26:22 18.0 6083.1 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000160.LAB 10/26/2010 10:27:22 45.3 12004.8 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000161.LAB 10/26/2010 10:28:23 43.1 11070.2 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000162.LAB 10/26/2010 10:29:24 41.3 10488.8 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000163.LAB 10/26/2010 10:30:25 38.6 10094.0 190.9 0.925

R1_C1_000164.LAB 10/26/2010 10:31:25 38.1 9824.7 190.8 0.925

R1_C1_000165.LAB 10/26/2010 10:32:26 36.9 9544.8 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000166.LAB 10/26/2010 10:33:27 38.8 9807.3 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000167.LAB 10/26/2010 10:34:27 47.3 11048.7 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000168.LAB 10/26/2010 10:35:28 69.2 16094.6 190.8 0.925

R1_C1_000169.LAB 10/26/2010 10:36:29 57.2 13356.9 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000170.LAB 10/26/2010 10:37:30 50.9 12433.8 190.8 0.927

R1_C1_000171.LAB 10/26/2010 10:38:30 45.0 11513.3 190.8 0.925

R1_C1_000172.LAB 10/26/2010 10:39:31 40.1 11066.3 190.8 0.927

R1_C1_000173.LAB 10/26/2010 10:40:32 32.3 9703.7 190.9 0.928



## Prj No 1685

## Isolatek, Huntington, IN, October 26, 2010

‐ FTIR Data

‐ Test Run 1

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) FTIR Gas Cell

Temp (C) FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm)

R1_C1_000174.LAB 10/26/2010 10:41:32 36.6 9930.5 190.9 0.927

R1_C1_000175.LAB 10/26/2010 10:42:33 51.7 11269.3 190.9 0.929

R1_C1_000176.LAB 10/26/2010 10:43:34 49.7 10779.6 190.9 0.928

R1_C1_000177.LAB 10/26/2010 10:44:35 44.1 10003.7 190.9 0.928

R1_C1_000178.LAB 10/26/2010 10:45:35 45.6 10359.9 190.9 0.929

R1_C1_000179.LAB 10/26/2010 10:46:36 43.4 9578.2 190.9 0.929

R1_C1_000180.LAB 10/26/2010 10:47:37 42.4 9440.5 190.9 0.929

R1_C1_000181.LAB 10/26/2010 10:48:38 37.1 8598.0 190.9 0.927

Minimum 15.3 5480.4

Maximum 99.5 21445.1

Average 53.1 12488.8



## Prj No 1685

## Isolatek, Huntington, IN, October 26, 2010

‐ FTIR Data

‐ Test Run 2

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) FTIR Gas Cell

Temp (C) FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm)

R2_C1_000222.LAB 10/26/2010 11:21:11 56.3 14132.1 190.8 0.930

R2_C1_000223.LAB 10/26/2010 11:22:11 49.6 13126.2 190.8 0.929

R2_C1_000224.LAB 10/26/2010 11:23:12 32.4 9318.9 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000225.LAB 10/26/2010 11:24:13 28.9 7898.4 190.8 0.929

R2_C1_000226.LAB 10/26/2010 11:25:13 54.7 12431.0 190.8 0.929

R2_C1_000227.LAB 10/26/2010 11:26:14 50.3 11017.7 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000228.LAB 10/26/2010 11:27:15 51.5 11075.1 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000229.LAB 10/26/2010 11:28:16 50.9 10712.1 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000230.LAB 10/26/2010 11:29:16 49.4 10405.1 190.8 0.930

R2_C1_000231.LAB 10/26/2010 11:30:17 83.2 17167.1 190.8 0.929

R2_C1_000232.LAB 10/26/2010 11:31:18 100.9 19048.0 190.9 0.929

R2_C1_000233.LAB 10/26/2010 11:32:18 89.4 17796.2 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000234.LAB 10/26/2010 11:33:19 75.6 15803.8 190.8 0.930

R2_C1_000235.LAB 10/26/2010 11:34:20 64.8 14211.6 190.8 0.930

R2_C1_000236.LAB 10/26/2010 11:35:21 56.3 12774.8 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000237.LAB 10/26/2010 11:36:21 49.8 11993.7 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000238.LAB 10/26/2010 11:37:22 45.2 11265.1 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000239.LAB 10/26/2010 11:38:23 56.2 12165.2 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000240.LAB 10/26/2010 11:39:24 62.0 12723.1 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000241.LAB 10/26/2010 11:40:24 60.8 12567.6 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000242.LAB 10/26/2010 11:41:25 55.1 11919.9 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000243.LAB 10/26/2010 11:42:26 53.4 12022.0 190.9 0.929

R2_C1_000244.LAB 10/26/2010 11:43:26 52.0 12043.3 190.8 0.929

R2_C1_000245.LAB 10/26/2010 11:44:27 79.2 17476.3 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000246.LAB 10/26/2010 11:45:28 67.3 14900.9 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000247.LAB 10/26/2010 11:46:29 61.6 14138.4 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000248.LAB 10/26/2010 11:47:29 58.8 13730.2 190.8 0.929

R2_C1_000249.LAB 10/26/2010 11:48:30 52.2 13209.7 190.9 0.928

R2 C1 000250 LAB 10/26/2010 11 49 31 47 9 13120 9 190 9 0 929 R2_C1_000250.LAB 10/26/2010 11:49:31 47.9 13120.9 190.9 0.929

R2_C1_000251.LAB 10/26/2010 11:50:32 41.2 12729.4 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000252.LAB 10/26/2010 11:51:32 29.3 10559.8 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000253.LAB 10/26/2010 11:52:33 44.1 12159.7 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000254.LAB 10/26/2010 11:53:34 48.4 12518.5 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000255.LAB 10/26/2010 11:54:34 49.7 12534.6 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000256.LAB 10/26/2010 11:55:35 53.6 13024.8 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000257.LAB 10/26/2010 11:56:36 53.4 12710.6 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000258.LAB 10/26/2010 11:57:37 64.9 15303.7 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000259.LAB 10/26/2010 11:58:37 79.7 17427.5 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000260.LAB 10/26/2010 11:59:38 70.2 15594.4 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000261.LAB 10/26/2010 12:00:39 59.7 14023.6 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000262.LAB 10/26/2010 12:01:40 50.0 12345.6 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000263.LAB 10/26/2010 12:02:41 45.3 11625.8 190.8 0.932

R2_C1_000264.LAB 10/26/2010 12:03:41 43.1 11361.3 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000265.LAB 10/26/2010 12:04:42 46.2 11196.2 190.8 0.931

R2_C1_000266.LAB 10/26/2010 12:05:42 58.3 11542.0 190.8 0.931

R2_C1_000267.LAB 10/26/2010 12:06:43 58.6 10843.3 190.8 0.932

R2_C1_000268.LAB 10/26/2010 12:07:44 56.6 10174.5 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000269.LAB 10/26/2010 12:08:45 57.3 10131.1 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000270.LAB 10/26/2010 12:09:45 56.8 10358.8 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000271.LAB 10/26/2010 12:10:46 56.5 11558.4 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000272.LAB 10/26/2010 12:11:47 105.2 19629.2 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000273.LAB 10/26/2010 12:12:48 100.5 19007.2 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000274.LAB 10/26/2010 12:13:48 90.2 17781.2 190.9 0.931



## Prj No 1685

## Isolatek, Huntington, IN, October 26, 2010

‐ FTIR Data

‐ Test Run 2

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) FTIR Gas Cell

Temp (C) FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm)

R2_C1_000275.LAB 10/26/2010 12:14:49 74.4 15628.2 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000276.LAB 10/26/2010 12:15:50 67.8 15022.0 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000277.LAB 10/26/2010 12:16:50 57.1 13591.7 190.9 0.932

R2_C1_000278.LAB 10/26/2010 12:17:51 45.6 11753.6 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000279.LAB 10/26/2010 12:18:52 40.7 11417.8 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000280.LAB 10/26/2010 12:19:53 40.1 9719.4 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000281.LAB 10/26/2010 12:20:53 50.8 9864.2 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000282.LAB 10/26/2010 12:21:54 52.4 9827.7 190.9 0.932

Minimum 28.9 7898.4

Maximum 105.2 19629.2

Average 58.1 13002.6



## Prj No 1685

## Isolatek, Huntington, IN, October 26, 2010

‐ FTIR Data

‐ Test Run 3

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) FTIR Gas Cell

Temp (C) FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm)

R3_C1_000317.LAB 10/26/2010 12:41:57 66.1 14810.1 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000318.LAB 10/26/2010 12:42:57 57.1 13249.5 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000319.LAB 10/26/2010 12:43:58 55.0 12988.8 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000320.LAB 10/26/2010 12:44:59 49.1 12267.7 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000321.LAB 10/26/2010 12:46:00 44.9 11961.1 190.9 0.933

R3_C1_000322.LAB 10/26/2010 12:47:00 44.8 12362.3 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000323.LAB 10/26/2010 12:48:01 38.3 11000.0 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000324.LAB 10/26/2010 12:49:02 45.0 10757.3 190.8 0.932

R3_C1_000325.LAB 10/26/2010 12:50:02 55.7 12019.9 190.8 0.931

R3_C1_000326.LAB 10/26/2010 12:51:03 53.4 11545.4 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000327.LAB 10/26/2010 12:52:04 53.2 10957.5 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000328.LAB 10/26/2010 12:53:05 52.3 10735.2 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000329.LAB 10/26/2010 12:54:05 52.6 10713.2 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000330.LAB 10/26/2010 12:55:06 49.5 10439.4 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000331.LAB 10/26/2010 12:56:07 84.2 17705.9 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000332.LAB 10/26/2010 12:57:08 80.1 17001.6 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000333.LAB 10/26/2010 12:58:08 77.3 16893.3 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000334.LAB 10/26/2010 12:59:09 73.4 16833.5 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000335.LAB 10/26/2010 13:00:10 66.5 15982.6 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000336.LAB 10/26/2010 13:01:10 55.8 14374.7 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000337.LAB 10/26/2010 13:02:11 57.0 15235.2 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000338.LAB 10/26/2010 13:03:12 50.0 12605.4 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000339.LAB 10/26/2010 13:04:13 55.1 11465.6 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000340.LAB 10/26/2010 13:05:13 55.9 11364.0 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000341.LAB 10/26/2010 13:06:14 55.6 10831.6 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000342.LAB 10/26/2010 13:07:15 56.7 10665.9 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000343.LAB 10/26/2010 13:08:15 55.7 10469.4 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000344.LAB 10/26/2010 13:09:16 53.5 10269.0 190.8 0.933

R3 C1 000345 LAB 10/26/2010 13 10 17 67 8 14549 7 190 9 0 931 R3_C1_000345.LAB 10/26/2010 13:10:17 67.8 14549.7 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000346.LAB 10/26/2010 13:11:18 96.2 20026.4 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000347.LAB 10/26/2010 13:12:18 99.5 20895.1 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000348.LAB 10/26/2010 13:13:19 94.8 20681.3 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000349.LAB 10/26/2010 13:14:20 88.5 20030.6 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000350.LAB 10/26/2010 13:15:20 81.4 19448.5 190.9 0.930

R3_C1_000351.LAB 10/26/2010 13:16:21 62.1 16724.0 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000352.LAB 10/26/2010 13:17:22 40.4 11847.0 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000353.LAB 10/26/2010 13:18:23 41.6 10539.0 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000354.LAB 10/26/2010 13:19:23 56.8 10025.1 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000355.LAB 10/26/2010 13:20:24 52.3 9137.6 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000356.LAB 10/26/2010 13:21:25 51.2 8575.6 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000357.LAB 10/26/2010 13:22:26 52.1 8406.2 190.9 0.933

R3_C1_000358.LAB 10/26/2010 13:23:26 50.4 8527.1 190.8 0.931

R3_C1_000359.LAB 10/26/2010 13:24:27 46.6 8680.0 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000360.LAB 10/26/2010 13:25:28 81.9 16959.5 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000361.LAB 10/26/2010 13:26:28 92.9 18932.3 190.8 0.932

R3_C1_000362.LAB 10/26/2010 13:27:29 93.8 18700.4 190.8 0.933

R3_C1_000363.LAB 10/26/2010 13:28:30 87.7 17884.2 190.8 0.932

R3_C1_000364.LAB 10/26/2010 13:29:31 83.7 17364.1 190.8 0.931

R3_C1_000365.LAB 10/26/2010 13:30:31 78.8 16878.2 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000366.LAB 10/26/2010 13:31:32 73.5 16489.4 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000367.LAB 10/26/2010 13:32:33 53.7 12196.0 190.8 0.931

R3_C1_000368.LAB 10/26/2010 13:33:33 70.5 13525.0 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000369.LAB 10/26/2010 13:34:34 65.2 12253.3 190.9 0.932



## Prj No 1685

## Isolatek, Huntington, IN, October 26, 2010

‐ FTIR Data

‐ Test Run 3

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) FTIR Gas Cell

Temp (C) FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm)

R3_C1_000370.LAB 10/26/2010 13:35:35 57.8 10741.1 190.8 0.932

R3_C1_000371.LAB 10/26/2010 13:36:36 54.6 10188.9 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000372.LAB 10/26/2010 13:37:36 48.3 9481.5 190.9 0.933

R3_C1_000373.LAB 10/26/2010 13:38:37 46.5 9169.8 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000374.LAB 10/26/2010 13:39:38 81.0 15469.9 190.9 0.933

R3_C1_000375.LAB 10/26/2010 13:40:39 91.6 17369.6 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000376.LAB 10/26/2010 13:41:39 94.5 18218.7 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000377.LAB 10/26/2010 13:42:40 94.5 18502.3 190.8 0.933

Minimum 38.3 8406.2

Maximum 99.5 20895.1

Average 64.4 13703.6



## Prj No 1685

# APPENDIX

QA/QC Data – Cupola #1

## Isolatek, Huntington, IN, October 26, 2010

‐ FTIR QAQC Data

< 1 2 < 8 Nitrogen Direct to FTIR

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) H2O

(%v) Ethylene

(ppmv wet)

N2_DIR_000001.LAB 10/26/2010 7:43:02 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.5

N2_DIR_000002.LAB 10/26/2010 7:43:18 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.5

N2_DIR_000003.LAB 10/26/2010 7:43:33 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.5

N2_DIR_000004BKG.LAB 10/26/2010 7:45:47 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.5

N2_DIR_000005.LAB 10/26/2010 7:46:05 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.5

CTS, 100.0 ppm Ethylene Direct Purge

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) H2O

(%v) Ethylene

(ppmv wet) Ethylene Recovery

(%)

100.0PPM_CTS_DIR_000006.LAB 10/26/2010 7:49:39 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 98.7 98.7%

100.0PPM_CTS_DIR_000007.LAB 10/26/2010 7:49:54 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 98.7 98.7%

100.0PPM_CTS_DIR_000008.LAB 10/26/2010 7:50:10 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 98.9 98.9%

100.0PPM_CTS_DIR_000009.LAB 10/26/2010 7:50:26 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 98.8 98.8%

100.0PPM_CTS_DIR_000010.LAB 10/26/2010 7:50:41 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 98.5 98.5%

100.0PPM_CTS_DIR_000011.LAB 10/26/2010 7:50:57 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 98.8 98.8%

2423 ppm Carbon Monoxide Direct Purge

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) H2O

(%v) Ethylene

(ppmv wet) Carbon Monoxide

Recovery (%)

2423PPM_CO_DIR_000012.LAB 10/26/2010 7:53:59 < 1 2348.7 < 0.05 < 0.5 96.9%

2423PPM_CO_DIR_000013.LAB 10/26/2010 7:54:14 < 1 2351.2 < 0.05 < 0.5 97.0%

2423PPM_CO_DIR_000014.LAB 10/26/2010 7:54:30 < 1 2350.4 < 0.05 < 0.5 97.0%

2423PPM_CO_DIR_000015.LAB 10/26/2010 7:54:46 < 1 2343.6 < 0.05 < 0.5 96.7%

2423 ppm Carbon Monoxide System Purge and Response Time Test (using determined direct CO concentration as expected concentration)

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) H2O

(%v) Ethylene

(ppmv wet) Carbon Monoxide

Recovery (%) Response Time*

(sec)

CO_RESP_000016.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:09 < 1 < 0.2 2.135 < 0.5 0.0% 4

CO RES 000017 LAB

_ P

_ . 10/26/2010 8: 00: 13 < 1 0 5

. 2 085

. < 0 5

. 0 0

. % 8

CO_RESP_000018.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:17 < 1 602.4 1.055 < 0.5 25.6% 12

CO_RESP_000019.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:21 < 1 2134.8 0.282 < 0.5 90.8% 16

CO_RESP_000020.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:24 < 1 2175.9 0.174 < 0.5 92.6% 20

CO_RESP_000021.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:28 < 1 2182.7 0.152 < 0.5 92.9% 24

CO_RESP_000022.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:32 < 1 2175.4 0.140 < 0.5 92.6% 28

CO_RESP_000023.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:36 < 1 2163.8 0.117 < 0.5 92.1% 31

CO_RESP_000024.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:40 < 1 2161.7 0.130 < 0.5 92.0% 35

CO_RESP_000025.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:44 < 1 2169.5 0.114 < 0.5 92.3% 39

CO_RESP_000026.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:48 < 1 2178.3 0.085 < 0.5 92.7% 43

CO_RESP_000027.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:52 < 1 2142.0 0.100 < 0.5 91.1% 47

CO_RESP_000028.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:56 < 1 2119.4 0.078 < 0.5 90.2% 51

CO_RESP_000029.LAB 10/26/2010 8:01:00 < 1 2138.8 0.102 < 0.5 91.0% 55

CO_RESP_000030.LAB 10/26/2010 8:01:04 < 1 2126.1 0.089 < 0.5 90.5% 59

CO_RESP_000031.LAB 10/26/2010 8:01:08 < 1 2137.4 0.078 < 0.5 91.0% 63

CO_RESP_000032.LAB 10/26/2010 8:01:11 < 1 2166.8 0.079 < 0.5 92.2% 67

CO_RESP_000033.LAB 10/26/2010 8:01:15 < 1 2185.2 0.080 < 0.5 93.0% 71

CO_RESP_000034.LAB 10/26/2010 8:01:19 < 1 2220.2 0.072 < 0.5 94.5% 75

CO_RESP_000035.LAB 10/26/2010 8:01:23 < 1 2235.0 0.081 < 0.5 95.1% 78

CO_RESP_000036.LAB 10/26/2010 8:01:27 < 1 2226.6 0.081 < 0.5 94.8%

CO_RESP_000037.LAB 10/26/2010 8:01:31 < 1 2217.6 0.064 < 0.5 94.4%

CO_RESP_000038.LAB 10/26/2010 8:01:35 < 1 2234.7 0.080 < 0.5 95.1%

CO_RESP_000039.LAB 10/26/2010 8:01:39 < 1 2236.8 0.095 < 0.5 95.2%

* Response Time = Time to recovery 95% of calibration gas delivered through the sampling system



## Prj No 1685

## Isolatek, Huntington, IN, October 26, 2010

‐ FTIR QAQC Data

: < 1 < 1 < CTS, 100.0 ppm Ethylene System Purge and Response Time Test

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) H2O

(%v) Ethylene

(ppmv wet) Ethylene Recovery

(%) Response Time*

(sec)

CTS_RESP_000040.LAB 10/26/2010 8:03:20 < 1 3.6 1.923 < 0.5 0.0% 4

CTS_RESP_000041.LAB 10/26/2010 8:03:24 < 1 309.7 1.457 < 0.5 0.0% 8

CTS_RESP_000042.LAB 10/26/2010 8:03:28 < 1 454.1 0.302 57.0 57.0% 12

CTS_RESP_000043.LAB 10/26/2010 8:03:32 < 1 24.6 0.149 96.4 96.4% 16

CTS_RESP_000044.LAB 10/26/2010 8:03:36 < 1 4.7 0.116 98.1 98.1%

CTS_RESP_000045.LAB 10/26/2010 8:03:40 < 1 2.5 0.090 98.0 98.0%

CTS_RESP_000046.LAB 10/26/2010 8:03:44 < 1 1.6 0.085 98.1 98.1%

CTS_RESP_000047.LAB 10/26/2010 8:03:48 < 1 1.7 0.083 97.9 97.9%

CTS_RESP_000048.LAB 10/26/2010 8:03:52 < 1 1.2 0.052 97.7 97.7%

CTS_RESP_000049.LAB 10/26/2010 8:03:55 < 1 0.9 0.068 97.8 97.8%

* Response Time = Time to recovery 95% of calibration gas delivered through the sampling system

Nitrogen System Purge

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) H2O

(%v) Ethylene

(ppmv wet)

N2_SYS_000057.LAB 10/26/2010 8:06:16 < 1 0.7 0.063 < 0.5

N2_SYS_000058.LAB 10/26/2010 8:06:32 < 1 0.4 0.062 < 0.5

N2_SYS_000059.LAB 10/26/2010 8:06:47 < 1 0.8 0.062 < 0.5

Ambient Air, Prior to Anylte Spike #1

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) H2O

(%v) Ethylene

(ppmv wet)

AMBIENT_AIR_000060.LAB 10/26/2010 8:11:24 < 1 4.2 1.933 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000061.LAB 10/26/2010 8:11:40 < 1 0.6 1.942 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000062.LAB 10/26/2010 8:11:55 < 1 0.6 1.933 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000063.LAB 10/26/2010 8:12:11 < 1 0.4 1.922 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000064.LAB 10/26/2010 8:12:27 < 1 0.4 1.943 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000065.LAB 10/26/2010 8:12:42 < 1 0.4 1.930 < 0.5

AMBI NT B E

_ AIR

_ 000066

. LA 10/26/2010 8: : 58 12 < 1 < 0 2

. 1 948

. < 0 5

.

Ambient Air Analyte Spike #1

‐ Using 2423 ppm CO

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) H2O

(%v) Ethylene

(ppmv wet) Dilution Factor Carbon Monoxide

Recovery (%)

CO_SPK_AMB_000067.LAB 10/26/2010 8:16:59 < 1 188.9 1.809 < 0.5 0.066 118.8%

CO_SPK_AMB_000068.LAB 10/26/2010 8:17:15 < 1 189.1 1.802 < 0.5 0.069 112.4%

CO_SPK_AMB_000069.LAB 10/26/2010 8:17:30 < 1 190.5 1.809 < 0.5 0.066 119.9%

CO_SPK_AMB_000070.LAB 10/26/2010 8:17:46 < 1 189.6 1.801 < 0.5 0.070 112.5%

CTS, 100.0 ppm Ethylene System Purge and Response Time Test

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) H2O

(%v) Ethylene

(ppmv wet) Ethylene Recovery

(%) Response Time*

(sec)

CTS_RESP_000182.LAB 10/26/2010 10:49:46 65.6 14880.3 2.625 < 0.5 0.0% 4

CTS_RESP_000183.LAB 10/26/2010 10:49:50 59.1 13629.0 2.641 < 0.5 0.0% 8

CTS_RESP_000184.LAB 10/26/2010 10:49:54 8.4 2067.0 2.429 18.5 18.5% 12

CTS_RESP_000185.LAB 10/26/2010 10:49:58 1.2 229.8 0.384 91.2 91.2% 16

CTS_RESP_000186.LAB 10/26/2010 10:50:02 < 1 69.3 0.135 97.8 97.8% 20

CTS_RESP_000187.LAB 10/26/2010 10:50:06 < 1 42.9 0.090 98.7 98.7%

CTS_RESP_000188.LAB 10/26/2010 10:50:10 < 1 31.8 0.057 97.7 97.7%

CTS_RESP_000189.LAB 10/26/2010 10:50:13 < 1 25.9 0.062 97.9 97.9%

CTS_RESP_000190.LAB 10/26/2010 10:50:17 < 1 22.4 0.052 98.6 98.6%

CTS_RESP_000191.LAB 10/26/2010 10:50:21 < 1 19.6 < 0.05 97.8 97.8%

CTS_RESP_000192.LAB 10/26/2010 10:50:25 < 1 18.2 < 0.05 98.7 98.7%

* Response Time = Time to recovery 95% of calibration gas delivered through the sampling system



## Prj No 1685

## Isolatek, Huntington, IN, October 26, 2010

‐ FTIR QAQC Data

: : 7 0 8 Ambient Air, Prior to Anylte Spike #2

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) H2O

(%v) Ethylene

(ppmv wet)

AMBIENT_AIR_000201.LAB 10/26/2010 10:59:56 < 1 4.0 1.913 0.7

AMBIENT_AIR_000202.LAB 10/26/2010 11:00:12 < 1 3.2 1.873 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000203.LAB 10/26/2010 11:00:28 < 1 3.3 1.876 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000204.LAB 10/26/2010 11:00:43 < 1 5.6 1.863 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000205.LAB 10/26/2010 11:00:59 < 1 3.7 1.838 < 0.5

Ambient Air Analyte Spike #2

‐ Using 2423 ppm CO

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) H2O

(%v) Ethylene

(ppmv wet) Dilution Factor Carbon Monoxide

Recovery (%)

CO_SPK_AMB_000207.LAB 10/26/2010 11:08:25 < 1 193.1 1.743 < 0.5 0.069 115.4%

CO_SPK_AMB_000208.LAB 10/26/2010 11:08:41 < 1 192.5 1.737 < 0.5 0.072 109.6%

CO_SPK_AMB_000209.LAB 10/26/2010 11:08:56 < 1 194.1 1.703 < 0.5 0.091 88.2%

CO_SPK_AMB_000210.LAB 10/26/2010 11:09:12 < 1 194.0 1.723 < 0.5 0.080 100.2%

CO_SPK_AMB_000211.LAB 10/26/2010 11:09:28 < 1 194.9 1.712 < 0.5 0.086 93.5%

CO_SPK_AMB_000212.LAB 10/26/2010 11:09:43 < 1 187.2 1.734 < 0.5 0.074 104.3%

CO_SPK_AMB_000213.LAB 10/26/2010 11:09:59 < 1 188.6 1.732 < 0.5 0.075 103.3%

CO_SPK_AMB_000214.LAB 10/26/2010 11:10:15 < 1 189.9 1.735 < 0.5 0.073 106.9%

CO_SPK_AMB_000215.LAB 10/26/2010 11:10:30 < 1 194.7 1.739 < 0.5 0.071 112.9%

CO_SPK_AMB_000216.LAB 10/26/2010 11:10:46 < 1 195.5 1.741 < 0.5 0.070 115.1%

CO_SPK_AMB_000217.LAB 10/26/2010 11:11:02 < 1 196.5 1.730 < 0.5 0.076 106.3%

CO_SPK_AMB_000218.LAB 10/26/2010 11:11:17 < 1 196.1 1.744 < 0.5 0.069 117.7%

CTS, 100.0 ppm Ethylene System Purge and Response Time Test

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) H2O

(%v) Ethylene

(ppmv wet) Ethylene Recovery

(%) Response Time*

(sec)

CTS_RESP_000283.LAB 10/26/2010 12:24:12 54.1 9724.4 1.827 < 0.5 0.0% 4

CTS_RESP_000284.LAB 10/26/2010 12:24:16 49.2 9409.7 1.857 < 0.5 0.0% 8

CTS_RESP_000285.LAB 10/26/2010 12:24:19 8.0 2311.3 1.907 12.8 12.8% 12

CT R 000286 B S

_ ESP

_ . LA 10/26/2010 12: : 23 24 1 1

. 252 7

. 0 341

. 88 8

. 88 8%

. 16

CTS_RESP_000287.LAB 10/26/2010 12:24:27 < 1 63.2 0.087 97.1 97.1% 20

CTS_RESP_000288.LAB 10/26/2010 12:24:31 < 1 36.6 0.070 97.6 97.6%

CTS_RESP_000289.LAB 10/26/2010 12:24:35 < 1 26.9 0.059 97.6 97.6%

CTS_RESP_000290.LAB 10/26/2010 12:24:39 < 1 21.1 0.056 98.7 98.7%

CTS_RESP_000291.LAB 10/26/2010 12:24:43 < 1 17.7 < 0.05 98.1 98.1%

CTS_RESP_000292.LAB 10/26/2010 12:24:47 < 1 16.2 < 0.05 98.5 98.5%

CTS_RESP_000293.LAB 10/26/2010 12:24:51 < 1 14.8 0.051 98.7 98.7%

* Response Time = Time to recovery 95% of calibration gas delivered through the sampling system

Ambient Air, Prior to Anylte Spike #3

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) H2O

(%v) Ethylene

(ppmv wet)

AMBIENT_AIR_000306.LAB 10/26/2010 12:28:25 < 1 3.0 1.333 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000307.LAB 10/26/2010 12:28:41 < 1 3.7 1.371 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000308.LAB 10/26/2010 12:28:57 < 1 2.9 1.378 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000309.LAB 10/26/2010 12:29:12 < 1 3.1 1.363 < 0.5

Ambient Air Analyte Spike #3

‐ Using 2423 ppm CO

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) H2O

(%v) Ethylene

(ppmv wet) Dilution Factor Carbon Monoxide

Recovery (%)

CO_SPK_AMB_000310.LAB 10/26/2010 12:32:04 < 1 141.4 1.280 < 0.5 0.060 97.6%

CO_SPK_AMB_000311.LAB 10/26/2010 12:32:20 < 1 141.4 1.288 < 0.5 0.054 107.9%

CO_SPK_AMB_000312.LAB 10/26/2010 12:32:35 < 1 140.9 1.297 < 0.5 0.048 122.4%

CO_SPK_AMB_000313.LAB 10/26/2010 12:32:51 < 1 141.3 1.295 < 0.5 0.048 120.5%

CO_SPK_AMB_000314.LAB 10/26/2010 12:33:07 < 1 140.6 1.288 < 0.5 0.054 107.9%

CO_SPK_AMB_000315.LAB 10/26/2010 12:33:22 < 1 141.2 1.290 < 0.5 0.053 110.7%



## Prj No 1685

## Isolatek, Huntington, IN, October 26, 2010

‐ FTIR QAQC Data

: : < 1 8 1 < 0 CTS, 100.0 ppm Ethylene System Purge and Response Time Test

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) H2O

(%v) Ethylene

(ppmv wet) Ethylene Recovery

(%) Response Time*

(sec)

CTS_RESP_000378.LAB 10/26/2010 13:43:51 87.5 17796.8 1.686 < 0.5 0.0% 4

CTS_RESP_000379.LAB 10/26/2010 13:43:55 86.9 17851.1 1.660 < 0.5 0.0% 8

CTS_RESP_000380.LAB 10/26/2010 13:43:59 25.7 7295.6 1.928 7.2 7.2% 12

CTS_RESP_000381.LAB 10/26/2010 13:44:03 2.6 471.7 0.409 84.2 84.2% 16

CTS_RESP_000382.LAB 10/26/2010 13:44:07 < 1 110.7 0.101 97.1 97.1% 20

CTS_RESP_000383.LAB 10/26/2010 13:44:11 < 1 61.5 0.067 97.4 97.4%

CTS_RESP_000384.LAB 10/26/2010 13:44:15 < 1 45.2 0.057 98.4 98.4%

CTS_RESP_000385.LAB 10/26/2010 13:44:19 < 1 36.3 0.056 98.1 98.1%

CTS_RESP_000386.LAB 10/26/2010 13:44:23 < 1 30.9 < 0.05 98.8 98.8%

CTS_RESP_000387.LAB 10/26/2010 13:44:27 < 1 27.2 < 0.05 98.3 98.3%

* Response Time = Time to recovery 95% of calibration gas delivered through the sampling system

Ambient Air, Prior to Anylte Spike #4

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) H2O

(%v) Ethylene

(ppmv wet)

AMBIENT_AIR_000403.LAB 10/26/2010 13:49:12 < 1 4.0 1.294 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000404.LAB 10/26/2010 13:49:28 < 1 3.8 1.315 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000405.LAB 10/26/2010 13:49:44 < 1 3.5 1.307 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000406.LAB 10/26/2010 13:49:59 < 1 3.5 1.280 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000407.LAB 10/26/2010 13:50:15 < 1 3.2 1.287 < 0.5

Ambient Air Analyte Spike #4

‐ Using 2423 ppm CO

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) H2O

(%v) Ethylene

(ppmv wet) Dilution Factor Carbon Monoxide

Recovery (%)

CO_SPK_AMB_000408.LAB 10/26/2010 13:56:17 < 1 115.9 1.242 < 0.5 0.042 113.8%

CO_SPK_AMB_000409.LAB 10/26/2010 13:56:32 < 1 115.9 1.224 < 0.5 0.056 85.6%

CO_SPK_AMB_000410.LAB 10/26/2010 13:56:48 < 1 115.7 1.224 < 0.5 0.056 84.6%

CO S A B

_ PK

_ MB

_ 000411

. LA 10/26/2010 13: : 04 57 < 1 115 8

. 1 226

. < 0 5

. 0 054

. 87 8%

.

Nitrogen System Purge

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) H2O

(%v) Ethylene

(ppmv wet)

N2_SYS_000412.LAB 10/26/2010 14:01:51 < 1 1.6 < 0.05 1.0

N2_SYS_000413.LAB 10/26/2010 14:02:06 < 1 1.9 0.056 1.3

N2_SYS_000414.LAB 10/26/2010 14:02:22 < 1 1.4 < 0.05 1.1

N2_SYS_000415.LAB 10/26/2010 14:02:38 < 1 1.6 0.056 1.3

N2_SYS_000416.LAB 10/26/2010 14:02:53 < 1 1.5 0.050 1.2

Nitrogen Direct to FTIR

Spectrum Date Time COS

(ppmv wet) CO

(ppmv wet) H2O

(%v) Ethylene

(ppmv wet)

N2_DIR_000001.LAB 10/26/2010 7:43:02 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.5

N2_DIR_000417.LAB 10/26/2010 14:09:01 < 1 0.8 < 0.05 < 0.5

N2_DIR_000418.LAB 10/26/2010 14:09:17 < 1 0.8 < 0.05 < 0.5

N2_DIR_000419.LAB 10/26/2010 14:09:32 < 1 0.7 < 0.05 < 0.5



## Prj No 1685

# Certificate of Analysis

Date of Analysis: 6/22/2006 Reference Number: 54-124068388-1

Part Number: X02NI99P15AD524

Grade of Product: PRIMARY

STANDARD

Cylinder Number Component Requested

Concentration Actual Concentration

(Mole %)



## CC156258 ETHYLENE 100.0 PPM 100.0 PPM

NITROGEN Balance Balance

Notes:

Relative Uncertainty of Analytical Value: +/- 1% of component or +/- 0.02% of absolute, which

ever is lower.

Primary Standard gas mixtures are traceable to N.I.S.T weights and/or N.I.S.T gas mixture

reference materials.

Signature on File

__________________________________

Approval Signature

Page 1QJi to!-’ CJ,

ii,... i 1 s

h$— it

OL —LA It’ “—4g1t1QeJ 7*co to 1 $1 0I

--

I • I —

iwr

—— — — iii

)L ahi £L—JL 4 4

I /

‘50).. c)

‘g sOb Si—?? 3) fl%qn)J*3wt4 fr___ ‘4J

sic w-zN e9 Z vsoqy a

SV1JS-Q) ‘roar 1 7W4 UI

•t) II er”v (°()pl 34 çjtcn& °k’@ 3JS

c&c ZN7

c453 - fli’zv d44ru

Ssv

irewSdWt(n-

?JG ‘SSDTh’dsQQ!(q Zn! tdt4

Xrl”t d 1 t’ ZN

lea D. 1 ’ ‘j!L1i-ii<i“I,—cT-zpiçth2/flck2IhhEQh--9yI‘d-k_UJôth;147-cAi))L-I24O?fWQjL-goc-o(--z2:t12zcm9Zf-1o‘hQILUhtOSi)411.,i9)f,s’1c)Vcbii/IIArV4DLkO