+(,121/,1(

Citation: 47 Fed. Reg. 19326 1982 

Content downloaded/printed from 

HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org)

Thu Jul 31 19:34:03 2014

-- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance

 of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license

 agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License

-- The search text of this PDF is generated from 

 uncorrected OCR text.
19326 Federal Register / Vol. 47, No. 87 / Wednesday, May 5, 1982 / Rules and Regulations

disestablish ROTC units proposed by

the Military Department Secretaries

(§ 92.5(c)).

(b) The Secretaries of the Military

Departments shall:

(1) Establish and operate ROTC units

upon requests from accredited

educational institutions meeting the

requirements outlined in § 92.5(b).

(2) Advise the ASD(MRA&L) and

other Military Services on the location

of proposed ROTC units before

releasing such information § 92.5(b)(4). (3) Initiate disestablishment

procedures of ROTC units in accordance

with § 92.5(c).

(4) Enter into a written contract as a

condition of providing an ROTC

scholarship to persons who agree to

conditions stipulated in paragraphs § 92.5(c)(3) and (11), and are otherwise

qualified. (5) Determine the period of active duty

to be served by an ROTC scholarship

recipient (§ 92.5(c)(3)(ii)).

(6) Authorize additional practical field

training under when determined that

such training serves the best interest of

the Military Service, and authorize

resultant expenditures (§ 92.5(g)).

§ 92.7 Procedures regarding oaths and

security requirements, medical

examination, deferment, commissioning and assignment of graduates.

(a) Oaths and security requirements.- (1) Basic Course Enrollment. (i) With the

exception of foreign students enrolled

under 10 U.S.C. 2103(b) each applicant for formal enrollment in the basic

course, Senior ROTC, shall execute the

following oath or affirmation:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will

support and defend the Constitution of the

United States against all enemies, foreign or

domestic; that I will bear true faith and

allegiance to the same; and that I take this

obligation freely, without any mental

reservation or purpose of evasion.

(ii) Students who are required or

permitted by educational institutions to

undergo military training and who are

not accepted for formal enrollment may

receive basic course instruction with the

approval of the Military Department

concerned.

(2) Financial Assistance Programs

and Advanced Course Enrollment. Each

applicant for appointment or enrollment

in any of the financial assistance

programs of the Military Services and

each applicant for appointment or

enrollment in the advanced course,

Senior ROTC, must satisfy the loyalty

and security requirements for enlistment

in the Reserve Components of the

appropriate Military Service.

(b) Medical examination. (1) To

reduce to an absolute minimum the loss,

at graduation, of persons found

medically disqualified for appointment

as commissioned officers, thorough and

complete medical examinations shall be

conducted before enrollment In the

scholarship program or at the time of or

immediately before enrollment in the

advanced courses of Army, Navy, and

Air Force ROTC programs.

(2) Such examinations shall, in all

respects, be equal to the examination

conducted to determine medical

qualifications for appointment as a

commissioned officer.

(3) Medically disqualified persons

may participate in a nonenrolled status

with the approval of the Military

Department concerned.

(c) Cross-enrollment. In order to

increase the number of quality students

in their host institution's ROTC

programs, ROTC units may enroll

qualified students from nearby nonhost

institutions. Cross-enrollment is

permitted when a host and nonhost

institution are directly linked by a crosstown or consortium agreement. A crosstown agreement Is a written agreement

among a host institution, a nonhost

institution, and Army, Navy, or Air

Force ROTC permitting students from

the nonhost institution to enroll in the

appropriate ROTC program. A

consortium agreement is an agreement made by two or more institutions for

their mutual benefit to permit crossenrollment of their students. As a

department of the host institution, the

ROTC unit shares as a beneficiary of the

consortium agreement. (d) Commissioning of graduates. Upon the successful completion of the

required course of instruction, a

graduate of a program referred to herein

shall, if otherwise qualified, be

appointed a regular or reserve officer in

the appropriate Military Service.

(e) Assignment of graduates. (1)

Graduates shall be called to active duty

or active duty for training as soon as

possible within a 12-month period

following their appointment as

commissioned officers.

(2) Graduates who have fulfilled their

active military training and service

obligation, or who have enlisted reserve

status and have performed 6 months of

active duty for training under 10 U.S.C.

511 or 672(d) following their

appointment as commissioned officers

and in accordance with Military Service

requirements, may either be ordered to

active duty or active duty for training

under conditions contained in

agreements with the Military

Departments, or be given appropriate

Ready Reserve assignments, preferably

in the Selected Reserve, when unit

location and skill requirements are

compatible with the residence of the

assignee and with his or her military

skill.

(3) A graduate may be delayed from

being ordered to active duty or active

duty for training under regulations

issued by the Secretary of the Military

Department concerned if he or she (i) is

the recipient of a fellowship or

scholarship; (ii) has been accepted by a

recognized institution of higher

education for graduate studies; (iii)

would suffer undue personal hardship;

or (iv) is otherwise precluded from

reporting as ordered for cogent and

acceptable reasons. If delayed, the

graduate shall remain subject to the

assignment criteria prescribed in

§ 92.7(e) (1) and (2), above, and shall be

assigned to active duty or active duty

for training, as appropriate, at such time

as the cause of his or her delay ceases

to exist.

M. S. Healy,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,

Department of Defense.

April 30, 1982.

[FR Doc. 82-12228 Filed 5-4-8M 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810-01-M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[A-9-FRL-1913-4]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans; Maricopa

County Urban Planning Area

Nonattalnment Area Plan; State of

Arizona

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Notice of final rulemaking.

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection

Agency is conditionally approving

changes to the Arizona State

Implementation Plan for the Maricopa

County Planning Area. These changes

were submitted to EPA for approval by

the Director of the Arizona Department

of Health Services under the provisions

of Part D of the Clean Air Act. These

revisions consist of control strategies

and regulations for carbon monoxide

(CO), ozone, (0.), and total suspended

particulate (TSP). This revision provides

emission limits necessary to insure

attainment of the National Ambient Air

Quality Standards for Maricopa County

Urban Planning Area.

DATE: This action is effective May 5,

1982.

ADDRESS: A copy of the NAP mentioned

above is located at: The Office of the
Federal Register / Vol. 47, No. 87 / Wednesday, May 5, 1982 / Rules and Regulations

Federal Register, 1100 "L" Street, NW.,

Room 8401, Washington. D.C. 20408.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

'David Howecamp, Acting Director, Air

and Hazardous Materials Division,

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 9, 215 Fremont Street, San

Franciso, CA 94105. Attn Douglas

Grano (415) 974-8224.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On January 4, January 18, February 23,

July 3, and November 8, 1979, the

Director of the Arizona Department of

Health Services, the Governor's official

designee, submitted revisions to the

Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP)

consisting of control strategies and

regulations for the Maricopa County

Urban Planning Area. These revisions,

which comprise the NAP, are intended

to provide for the attainment of the

National Ambient Air Quality Standards

(NAAQS) for CO, O, and TSP.

On June 11 and October 30, 1979, EPA

published notices of proposed

rulemaking for the CO and Os portions

of the NAP. On January 10 and May 28,

1980, EPA published notices of proposed

rulemaking for the Arizona State Rules

and Regulations and the TSP portion of

the NAP, respectively. Those notices

provided a description of the NAP and

regulations, summarized the applicable

Clean Air Act requirements Into 14

criteria, compared the NAP to those

criteria, and proposed to approve,

conditionally approve, and disapprove

portions of the NAP. In addition, on July

23, 1980, EPA published a notice of

proposed rulemaking, addressing among

other things, the Arizona State New

Source Review (NSR) rules submitted on

April 1, 1980.

On October 22. 1980, EPA published a

notice of proposed rulemaking for the

NAP since revisions were submitted on

June 23 and July 17, 1980. The October

22, 1980 notice supersedes the June 11

and October 30, 1979 notices and

supplements the January 10, May 28, and

July 23, 1980 notices. Therefore, the

January 10, May 28, July 23, and October

22, 1980 notices should be used as a

reference in reviewing today's action.

Supplemental Revisions

On April 1, 1980, the State submitted

as SIP revisions amendments to its

Rules and Regulations for Air Pollution

Control. On July 23, 1980, EPA proposed

action on those rules related to New

Source Review (NSR). However, in that

proposal EPA inadvertently did not

propose action on Rule R9-3-101 .A. No.

111, the definition of "significance

levels." This definition is important to

the administration of many provisions in

Arizona's NSR rules, and its inclusion in

today's final rulemaking is necessary to

preserve the meaning and intent of these

provisions. Since the public has had

adequate opportunity to comment on

Arizona's NSR rules which use the term,

EPA finds that for good cause additional

notice and comment on this definition is

unnecessary.

On July 17, 1980, the State submitted

an SIP revision which included the

renumbering of several definitions. EPA

also finds that for good cause additional

notice and comment on the following

renumbered definitions is unnecessary

since they are not substantive changes:

R9-3-101-Definitions; A., Nos. 73, 74,

75, 83, 8, 87, 88, 90, 91, 94, 98, 99, 100,

113, 119, 120, and 124.

It should be noted that the State

submitted an SIP revision requesting an

extension to the CO attainment date for

the Maricopa County Urban Planning

Area on October 30, 1980. That revision

is not addressed In today's final

rulemaking notice, however, EPA

proposed approval of the extension

request in a recently published Federal

Register notice.

Public Comments

During the public comment period.

EPA received comments from the

Maricopa County Health Department,

Maricopa Association of Governments,

Arizona Public Service Company, and

Arizona Department of Health Services

(ADHS). Comments received are

specifically identified and responded to

in EPA's Public Comment Technical

Support Document (contained in

Document File NAP-AZ-Iat the EPA

Library in Washington, D.C. and the

Region 9 Office).

EPA Actions

Introduction

The criteria used in EPA's review are

detailed in the General Preamble and

four supplements referenced in the

notice of proposed rulemaking.

While EPA's evaluation of the NAP

for ozone includes use of "Control

Technique Guidelines" ("CTG's")

documents as a "presumptive norm," the

states may adjust the recommended

controls or develop requirements which

are not based on the CTG's, provided

'that they submit information supporting

their decisions.

It should be noted that action may be

taken on a portion of the NAP for a

specific pollutant. Therefore, a portion

of the NAP may be adequate for one

pollutant but inadequate for others. It Is

EPA's policy to take .final action on all

portions of the NAP for each pollutant.

As a result, this notice contains a series

of actions for each pollutant and for

each portion of the NAP rather than a

single action. One of tho following three

actions may be taken for each portion of

the NAP:

1. Disapproval where deficiencies are

of such magnitude as to significantly

interfere with the basic objective of the

NAP, or

2. Approval where the portion of the

NAP under consideration meets all

requirements; or

3. Approval with conditions where

deficiencies exist, but where the effect

of the deficiency is not judged to be

major and the State has agreed to take

those steps necessary to correct the

deficiency. In this case, it is EPA's

understanding that the State will

proceed expeditiously to correct the

noted deficiency by certain dates.

For further information, see the

supplements to EPA's General Preamble.

EPA's final actions on the Maricopa

County Urban Planning Area NAP are

described below and are based on the

proposed rulemaking notices, the

supplemental revisions submitted by the

State and the public comments received

by EPA.

Approved Portions of the NAP

EPA is taking final action under

Section 172 of the Clean Air Act to

approve Rules 33 and 34 since they

provide emission limits necessary to

Insure attainment of the NAAQS.

As proposed in the May 28 and

October 22, 1980 notices, EPA is taking

final action under Part D of the Clean

Air Act to approve the following

portions of the Maricopa County Urban

Planning Area NAP, emission inventory,

modeling, emission reduction estimates,

attainment provision (except TSP),

reasonable further progress, legally

adopted measures, emission growth,

annual reporting, resources, public and

government involvement, and public

hearing. Although EPA is approving the

NAP for CO, it should be noted that the

CO control strategy is not adequate to

attain the standard by 1982. An

extension request indicating attainment

by 1987 has been submitted and

proposed for approval'in a separate

Federal Register notice.

Conditionally Approved Portions of the

NAP

As proposed in the May 28 and

October 22, 1980 notices, the following

portions of the Maricopa County Urban

Planning Area NAP contain minor

deficiencies and the State has provided

assurances to correct these deficiencies:

Attainment provision (TSP only) and

19327
19328 Federal Register / Vol. 47, No. 87 / Wednesday, May 5, 1982 / Rules and Regulations

permit program. Therefore, EPA is

taking final action to conditionally.

approve these portions of the NAP.

The material required to satisfy

conditions of approval must be

submitted as an SIP revision as

specified below:

New Source Review

By August 3, 1982, the NSR rules must

be revised to meet the requirements in

EPA's amended regulations for NSR (45

FR 31307, May 13, 1980 and 45 FR 52676,

August 7, 1980).

Total Suspended Particulate

By August 3, 1982, the State must

submit a schedule for the development,

adoption, and implementation of those

measures necessary for attainment of

the particulate standards.

Final Action on the NAP

As described in the May 28 and

October 22, 1980 notices, only minor

deficiencies remain in the Maricopa

County NAP. Therefore, EPA is taking

final action today to conditionally

approve the overall NAP with respect to

Part D. As a result, the current

prohibition on construction of certain

sources in the Maricopa County Urban

Planning-Area is no longer in effect.

In those areas for which the State has

submitted approvable or conditionally

approvable NAPs in accordance with

the requirements of Part D of the Clean

Air Act, EPA has a responsibility to take

final action as soon as possible in order

to lift the construction prohibition. Since

the State has submitted approvable or

conditionally approvable NAPs for the

area discussed in this notice, EPA finds

that good cause exists for making this

action immediately effective.

The new SIP requirements approved

or conditionally approved by today's

notice are an addition to the existing SIP

and do not supersede or replace the

"old" SIP requirements until a source

comes into compliance with the new

requirements. For further information,

see EPA's General Preamble.

As a result of approval of certain

portions of the NAP, EPA is taking final

action to rescind the following

analogous portions of 40 CFR Part 52:

§52.129 Review of new sources and

modifications [paragraph (f) only].

§ 52.137 Employer carpool incentive

program.

§ 52.138 Bus/carpool matching

program.

Regulatory Process

Under Executive Order 12291, EPA

must judge whether a regulation is

"major" and therefore subject to the

requirement of a Regulatory Impact

Analysis. This regulation is not major

because it approves state actions. This

regulation was submitted to the Office

of Management and Budget for review

as requied by Executive Order 12291.

Under the Clean Air Act, any petitions

for judicial review of this action must be

filed in the United States Court of

Appeals for the appropriate circuit by

(60 days from today). This action may

not be challenged later in proceedings to

enforce its requirements.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Air Pollution control, Ozone, Sulfur

oxides, Nitrogen dioxide, Lead,

Particulate matter, Carbon monoxide,

Hydrocarbons.

Pursuant to section 605(b) of the

Regulatory Flexibility Act, I certify that

this action will not have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities. This action

merely approves state actions. This

action imposes no new requirements.

Incorporation by reference of the

State Implementation Plan for the State

of Arizona was approved by the

Director of the Federal Register bn July

1, 1981.

(Sec. 110, 129, 171 to 178, and 301(a) of the

Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7410,

7429, 7501 to 7508, and 7601a)]])

Dated: April 26,1982.

Anne M. Gorsuch,

Administrator.

PART 52-APPROVAL AND

PROMULGATION OF

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

Subpart D of Part 52 of Chapter I, Title

40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is

amended as follows:

Subpart D-Arizona

1. Section 52.120 is amended by

adding paragraphs (c)(27), (28), (29), and

(32) to (45) as follows:

§ 52.120 Identification of plan.

(c) * *

(27) The following amendments to the

plan were submitted on January 4,1979

by the Governor's designee.

(i) Arizona State Rules and

Regulations for Air Pollution Control.

(A) R-9-3-101, A., Nos. 2. 3, 29, 41, 53,

55, 87, 88, 89, 91, 92, 95, 100 and 117; R9-

3 -301, paragraphs D, J, and N; R9-3--306.

paragraphs D and J; and R9-3-307,

paragraphs C and E.

(28) The following amendments to the

plan were submitted on January 18, 1979

by the Governor's designee.

(i) Maricopa County Bureau of Air

Pollution Control Rules and Regulations.

(A) Rule 33, Storage and Handling of

Petroleum Products.

(29) [Reserved]

(32) The following amendments to the

plan were submitted on February 23,

1979 by the Governor's designee.

(i) Nonatainment Area Plan for

Carbon Monoxide and Photochemical

Oxidants, Maricopa County Urban

Planning Area.

(33)-(35) [Reserved]

(36) The following amendments to the

plan were submitted on July 3,1979 by

the Governor's designee.

(i) Revision to the Nonattainment

Area Plan for Carbon Monoxide and

Photochemical Oxidants, Maricopa

County Urban Planning Area.

(37)-{38) [Reserved]

(39) The following amendments to the

plan were submitted on November 8,

1979 by the Governor's designee.

(i) Nonattainment Area Plan for Total

Suspended Particulates, Maricopa

County Urban Planning Area.

(40)-(42) [Reserved]

(43) The following amendments to the

plan were submitted on April 1, 1980 by

the Governor's designee.

(i) Arizona State Rules and

Regulations for Air Pollution Control.

(A) R9-3-101, A., Nos. 7, 27, 46, 52, 54,

72, 73, 74, 81, 84, 85, 86, 88, 89, 92, 96, 97,

98, 111, 117, 118, and 122; R9-3-301,

paragraphs B-i, B-2, C, E, F, H, I, 1, K,

M, N, 0, P, and Q; R9-3-302, (except

paragraphs D, E, and I; R9-3-303; R9-3-

306, paragraphs B-2, C-i, C-3, and C-5

to C-7, E, F, G-1, C-3, G-4, H, and I; and

R9-3-307, paragraphs A, B, D, and F.

(44) The following amendments to the

plan were submitted on June 23, 1980 by

the Governor's designee.

(i) Maricopa County Bureau of Air

Pollution Control Rules and Regulations.

(A) Rule 34, Organic Solvents.

(45) The following amendments to the

plan were submitted on July 17,1980 by

the Governor's designee.

(i) Arizona State Rules and

Regulations for Air Pollution Control.

(A) R-9-3-101, A., Nos. 73, 74, 75, 83,

86, 87, 88, 90, 91, 94, 98, 99, 100, 113, 119,

120, and 124; R9-3-301, paragraphs A, B3, G, 1, J, K, L, M, N, 0, P, Q, and R; R9-

.3-306, paragraphs A, B-i, B-3, B-4, C-2,

C-4, and G-2; and R9-3-320, paragraphs

B and C.

2. Section 52.122 is revised to read as

follows:

§ 52.122 Extensions.

(a) The Administrator hereby extends

for 2 years the attainment date for the

national primary standards for sulfur
Federal Register / Vol. 47, No. 87 / Wednesday, May 5, 1982 / Rules and Regulations

oxides in the Maricopa, Pima, Central

Arizona, and Southeast Arizona

Intrastate Regions.

(b) The Administrator hereby extends

for 18 months the statutory timetable for

submittal of the plan for attainment and

maintenance of the secondary standards

for sulfur oxides in the Maricopa, Pima,

Central Arizona, and Southeast Arizona

Intrastate Regions.

(c) The Administrator hereby extends

to July 31, 1977, the attainment date for

the national primary standards for sulfur

oxides in the Northern Arizona

Intrastate Region.

(d) The Administrator hereby extends

to December 31, 1982 certain attainment

dates for the national standards for

carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (O), and

total suspended particulates (TSP), in

the following areas:

(1) Maricopa County Urban Planning

Area for OR. and TSP.

3. Section 52.123 is amended by

adding paragraphs (c) and (d) reading as

follows:

§ 52.123 Approval status. S * * * *

(c) With the exceptions set forth in

this subpart, the Administrator approves

the plan with respect to Part D, Title I of

the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977,

for the nonattainment areas listed in this

paragraph. (1) Maricopa County Urban

Planning Area for CO and TSP.

(d) With the exceptions set forth in

this subpart, the Administrator approves

the plan with respect to Part D, Title I of

the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977,

for the nonattainment areas listed in this

paragraph. In addition, continued

satisfaction of the requirements of Part

D for the ozone f ortion of the State

Implementation Plan (SIP) depends on

the adoption and submittal by January 1,

1981, of reasonably available control

technology (RACT) requirements for

sources covered by Control Technique

Guidelines (CTG's) published between

January 1978 and January 1979.

(1) Maricopa County Urban Planning

Area for O3.

4. Subpart D of Part 52 is amended by

-adding § 52.124, reading as follows:

§ 52.124 Part D conditional approval.

(a) The following portions of the

Arizona SIP contain deficiencies with

respect to Part D of the Clean Air Act

which must be corrected by meeting the

Indicated conditions of Part D plan

approval.

(1) The Maricopa County Urban

Planning Area portion of the Arizona

SIP is approved as satisfying Part D

requirements provided the following

conditions are met:

(i) For carbon monoxide, ozone, and

total suspended particulate:

(A) By August 3, 1982, the NSR rules

must be revised to meet the

requirements in EPA's amended

regulations for NSR (45 FR 31307, May

13, 1980 and 45 FR 52676, August 7,

1980).

(i) For total suspended particulate:

(A) By August 3, 1982, the State must

submit a schedule for the development,

adoption, and implementation of those

measures necessary for attainment of

the particulate standards.

5. In § 52.131, the entries for Arizona

are revised as follows:

§ 52.131 Attainment dates for national

standards.

Air quality control region end TSP so* NO, CO 06

nonattainment area Primary " Secondary Primary Secondary

Central Arizona Intrastate ........................... e ... ......... s ..................... b .... b.......... c . (4) . (5).

Maflopa Intrastate:

Maricopa County Urban Planning d ............... d .. .............. b.... .. ............. C .............. (4)..... d.

Area Nonattainment Area.

Remainder of Interstate ....................... t 

............. ..................... b ............... b ....................... c . (4) . .... ().

Mohave-Yuma Intrastate ...................... a .. a......... ................. . .. a a. Northern Arizona Intrstate ........................ a ............... a .................... (-) ............. (a) ................... C c . c. Pima Intrastate.. . ..................................... a' ............. 02 ..................... b ............... b ....................... ............... (4) . (5).

Southeast Arizona Intrastate:

Santa Cruz County ............................... e

t 

............. OR ..................... b .............. b ....................... c ............... (4) ............. ().

Remainder of Intrastate ....................... a .. . a ...... ............. b b ......... c . c . c.

'July 1975.

sJuly 1977.

'July 31, 1977. 4May 31. 1977.

'May 31, 1975.

No .-- Datea or footnotes which are italicized are prescribed by the Administrator because the plan does not provide a specific date or the date provided is not acceptable. NoTE.-Sources subject to plan r uirements and attainment dates established under section 1 0(a)(2)(A) prior to the 1977 Clean Air Act amendments remain obligated to comply with those requirements by the earlier deadlines. The earlier attainment

dates are set out at 40 CFR 52.131 (1980).

a a a * a

(d) December 31, 1982. a a * * a

6. Section 52.136 is revised to read as

follows:

§ 52.136 Control strategy: Carbon

monoxide.

The requirements of § 51.14 of this

chapter are not met because the plan

does not contain sufficient measures to

provide for attainment and maintenance

of the national standards for carbon

monoxide in the Pima Intrastate Region

as expeditiously as practicable.

7. Section 52.137 is amended by

removing and reserving (a)(1) and by

revising paragraph (b) to read as

follows:

§ 52.137 Employer carpool Incentive

program.

(a) * * *

(1) [Reserved] a a a * *

(b) This section is applicable within

the Greater Tucson area in the Pima

Intrastate Air Quality Control Region.

8. Section 52.138 is amended by removing and reserving paragraphs

(a)(1), (c)(1)(i), (c)(2)(i), and (c)(3)(i) and

by revising paragraphs (b) and (d)(2), to

read as follows:

§ 52.138 Bus/carpool matching program.

(a) * * A

(1) [Reserved]

(2) * * *

(b) This section is applicable within

the Greater Tucson Area in the Pima

Intrastate Air Quality Control Region.

(c) * * *

(1) * * *

(i) [Reserved]

(ii) * * *

(2) * * *

(i) [Reserved]

(ii) * *

(3) * * *

(i) [Reserved]

(ii) * * *

(d) * * *

* * * * *

(2) A manual or computer method of

matching information that will have

provisions for locating each applicant's

origin and destination within a grid

system in the urban area and the semirural region surrounding the Greater

Tucson Area and matching applicants

with identical origin and destination

grids and compatible work schedules. • * * . * *

§ 52.139 [Removed and Reserved].

9. Section 52.139 is removed and

reserved.

[FR Doc. 82-1203 Filed $-4-82: 8:45 am)

BILLING CODE 6560-50-M

19329