alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32
                           ==========



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to
     Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crafty Admiral Enterprises, Ltd.
(Registrant) on Form 10Q-SB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Lawrence Siccia, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

   (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of Registrant.


Dated:  November 13, 2005       /s/ Lawrence Siccia
                              ----------------------------------
                              Chief Executive Officer,
                              Chief Financial Officer and
                              Principal Accounting Officer of
                              Crafty Admiral Enterprises, Ltd.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I,
Patricia G. Kriss, Chief Financial Officer of Entropin, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(a)    the Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and



(b)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 30, 2004
|                      | 
|By:                   |  | /s/ PATRICIA G. KRISS  
|                      |  |                        
|                      |  | Patricia G. Kriss      
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Weston Technologies
Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Isaacs K. Li, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


By: /s/ Isaacs K. Li
------------------------------------
Isaacs K. Li, Chief Financial Officer

Date: December 5, 2005
R eco r d o f Discu ss i o n D ocket No. FAA- Directorate Id e n ti fi er: -A D With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discu s sed (i.e. , Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA , ALPA, GAMA, e tc) ?

ORGAN I ZATION P ERSON C O NTACTED DATE TOP ICS DI SCUSSED Boeing _ Steve Chapma n Various F l eet S tatus, Root Cause, Boeing Ron Tropple Va r ious Service Bullet ins

Oth e r /A d di t i o na l Inform a ti o n :
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, James W. Bernau, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Willamette Valley
Vineyards, Incorporated;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small
business issuer and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: December 6, 2004
_     /s/         _
    James W. Bernau,
    Chief Executive Officer
STATE of North Carolina, v. Nazario Garcia HERNANDEZ, Defendant.

No. COA18-973

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 20, 2019

AFFIRMED IN PART. REVERSED. REMANDED IN PART.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 103 (Friday, May 29, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 30631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-13058]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

48 CFR Part 1501

Acquisition Regulation; OMB Approvals Under the Paperwork 
Reduction Act

CFR Correction

0
In Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapters 15 to 28, 
revised as of October 1, 2014, on page 6, in section 1501.370, in the 
table, for the first entry, remove ``through'' and add ``and'' in its 
place.

[FR Doc. 2015-13058 Filed 5-28-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
STATE v. Rama Dion Benjamin CRUMP

151PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 8, 2019

Ann B. Petersen, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Crump, Ramar Dion Benjamin.

James R. Glover, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill.

Peter A. Regulski, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*693The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 6th of May 2019 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of May 2019."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 10th day of June 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 3 - 00 18 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 3 - CE - 0 4 9 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
Amendment to the Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Retirement Income Plan



 Exhibit 10.19.4 
 AMENDMENT TO THE HAWKER BEECHCRAFT 
 CORPORATION
RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN FOR 
 SALARIED EMPLOYEES 
 THIS AMENDMENT (“Amendment”) is made this 18th day of December, 2009, to the Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Retirement Income Plan for Salaried
Employees (the “Plan”) by Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (the “Company”), as sponsor of the Plan. 
 WHEREAS, the Company has reserved the right to amend the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, the board of directors of
the Company has approved adoption of this Amendment. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

 (1) Effective January 1, 2009, Section 1.15 is amended to include within a Participant’s Compensation for
purposes of Code Section 415 any differential pay paid by the Employer to the Participant during the Limitation Year. 
 (2) Effective January 1, 2009, Section 2.07 is amended to add a new subsection (c) at the end thereof: 
 (c) For purposes of applying any Code-based requirements to this Plan, including, but not limited to, the limitations under Code Section 415 and any applicable nondiscrimination requirement, a
Participant receiving a Differential Wage Payment will be treated as an employee of the Employer making the payment, and the Differential Wage Payment will be treated as “compensation” of the Participant receiving the payment. 

As used in this Section, the term “Differential Wage Payment” means any payment that (i) is made by
an Employer to a Participant with respect to any period during which the Participant is performing service in the uniformed services (as defined in chapter 43 of title 38, United States Code) while on active duty for a period of more than 30 days,
and (ii) represents all or a portion of the wages the Participant would have received from the Employer if the Participant were performing service for the Employer. 
 (3) Effective January 1, 2007, Section 9.07(b)(1) is amended to add the following new paragraph at the end thereof: 
 A portion of a distribution will not fail to be an eligible rollover distribution merely because the portion consists of after-tax employee contributions which are not includible in gross income. However,
such portion may be transferred only to an individual retirement account or annuity described in section 408(a) or (b) of the Code or to a plan described in section 401(a), 403(a), or 403(b) of the Code that agrees to separately account for
amounts so transferred, including separately accounting for the portion of such distribution which is includible in gross income and the portion of such distribution which is not so includible. 
  

 -1- 








 (4) Effective January 1, 2008, Section 9.07(b)(2) is amended to include within the
definition of “eligible retirement plan” a Roth IRA described in Code Section 408A. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Company has caused this amendment to be executed as of the date first set forth above. 
  

			
	HAWKER BEECHCRAFT CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ James D. Knight

	Name:	 	 James D. Knight

	Title:	 	 Vice President and Controller



  

 -2-
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of AMDL, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Arthur S. Rosten,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
 /s/ Arthur S. Rosten  Arthur S. Rosten
Chief Financial Officer
March 29, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report (as defined under the preceding Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, Gerhard
Entzmann, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of Quadriga Capital Management,
Inc., the general partner of Quadriga Superfund, L.P. (the "Fund"), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Fund.

                                           By: /s/ Gerhard Entzmann
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Gerhard Entzmann
                                           Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
                                           November 12, 2003

                                      E-5
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5184 

To require businesses to permit customers to cancel certain subscription 

services in the same manner and by the same means as is provided 

by such person to individuals to subscribe to such service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2006 

Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require businesses to permit customers to cancel certain 

subscription services in the same manner and by the 

same means as is provided by such person to individuals 

to subscribe to such service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Consumer Cancellation 

5 Fairness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CANCELLATION OF SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES. 

7 Not later than 180 days days after the date of the 

8 enactment of this Act, the Federal Trade Commission 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5184 IH 

1 shall promulgate rules pursuant to section 18 of the Fed2 eral trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a) to require any 

3 person providing a subscription service to provide, at min4 imum, the ability for individuals who have subscribed to 

5 such service to cancel such service in the same manner 

6 and by the same means as is provided by such person to 

7 individuals to subscribe to such service. 

8 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

9 For purposes of the rulemaking required under sec10 tion 2— 

11 (1) the term ‘‘person’’ has the same meaning 

12 given such term in section 551(2) of title 5, United 

13 States Code; and 

14 (2) the term ‘‘subscription service’’ means any 

15 service, including the regular delivery of any prod16 uct, for which an individual agrees to receive regular 

17 or continual receipt of such service or product and 

18 is charged recurring fees or charges for the period 

19 during which the individual receives such service, 

20 and shall not include any service which requires pay21 ment in full before receiving such service. 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Exhibit 32

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Regal Entertainment Group, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), each hereby
certifies that, to his/her knowledge on the date hereof:



| |  |  |  | /s/MICHAEL L. CAMPBELLMichael L. Campbell
Chief Executive Officer
November 8, 2005
| |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | /s/AMY E. MILESAmy E. Miles
Chief Financial Officer
November 8, 2005              

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 4.3


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


      We consent to the reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus and to the use of our report dated March 8, 2011, in this Registration Statement (File No. 333-172175) of Smart Trust, Value Architects Innovation SCORE Portfolio Trust (2011 Series B).

		
	    	 /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

      GRANT THORNTON LLP
    



 Chicago, Illinois

March 8, 2011
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- RLM Communications, Inc. Under Contract No. W91247-12-D-0012 APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60324
Kyle R. Still, Esq. Benjamin N. Thompson, Esq.

Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP Raleigh, NC Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney MAJ Julie A. Glascott, JA

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 9 March 2016

Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60324, Appeal ofRLM Communications, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
ROBERT SNIPE JR.

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 1953

_______ ______________________/

Opinion filed July 12, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. W. Joel Boles , Judge

.

Robert Snipe Jr., pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PE R CURIAM.

DISMISSED

.

BILBREY, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T DA VI D P. VA ND AM ENT, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. M A R K D U N C A N , C o m m a n d e r ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 35973 D . C . N o . 3 : 0 8 -cv -0 5 5 2 2 -R JB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on R obe rtJ . B ry a n, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r19, 2010 ** B efo re: O ’ S C A N N L A IN , T A L L M A N , an dB E A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. D a vi d P . V a nda m e nt , aW a s hi ngt on s t a t e pr i s one r , appe a l s pr o s e f r om the d is tr ic t c o u rt’s ju d g m e n t d is m is s in g w ith o u t p r e ju d ic e h is 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 28 U . S . C . § 1 29 1. W e r evi ew de no vo a di sm i ss al 

# FI LED OC T 29 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 35973 2 u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 9 1 5 ( e ) ( 2 ) , H uf t i le v . Mi cc i o-Fon se ca , 4 1 0 F .3 d1 1 3 6 , 1 1 3 8 ( 9 th C i r . 2005) , a nd m a ya f

f i rm on a nygr ound s upport e d bythe r e c or d, O ’G ui nn v. L o velo ck C o rr. C tr. , 5 0 2 F. 3 d 1 0 5 6 , 1 0 5 9 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 7 ) . W e a f f i rm. Th e d i s tr i c tc o u rtp r o p e r l yd i s mi s s e dw i th o u tp r e j u d i c e V a n d a me n t ’ s c l a i ms b a s e do n a rr e s ts , s e a r c h e s a n d s e iz u r e . See H arv e yv . W aldr on , 210 F . 3d 1008, 1 0 1 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) , o v e rr u le d o n o th e rg r o u n d

s b yW a lla c e v . Ka to , 549 U . S . 384 (200 7) (“ a § 19 83 ac t i on thatw ou l d cal l i nt o q uest i on the l aw ful ness of a pl ai nt i ff’ s c on vi ct i on or confi nem enti s notcogn i zabl e” un der H ec k v . H um ph re y , 51 2 U . S . 47 7 (19 94 )) . B ec ause am endm entw ou l d b e f ut i l e, the di stri ctcourt p r o p e r lyd is m is s e d th e s e c la im s w ith o u t le a v e to a m e n d . See Cato v. U ni ted States , 70 F . 3d 1103, 1106 ( 9th C i r . 1995) . W e a r e notpe r s ua de d tha ta ny r e m a in in g c la im s a r e c o g n iz ab le o rc o u ldb e c u r e db ya m e n d m e n t. Se e id . W e d o n o t c o n s id e ra r g u m e n ts r a is e df o rth e f ir s t tim e o n ap p e a l. Se e Sm ith v. M a rsh , 19 4 F . 3d 10 45 , 10 52 (9th C i r. 19 99 ). AF F I RME D.