alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Gregg D. Scheller, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Synergetics USA, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release34-47986];(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: October 31, 2005         /s/ Gregg D. Scheller   Gregg D. Scheller   President and Chief Executive Officer
FIRST AMENDMENT TO


SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE







This First Amendment to Secured Promissory Note (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 22nd day of February, 2011 by and between General Cannabis, Inc. (f/k/a LC Luxuries Limited), a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and Keith Hoerling, an individual (the “Holder”).







RECITALS







WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder are parties to that certain Secured Promissory Note dated as of November 19, 2010 in the original principal amount of $900,000.00 (the “Original Agreement”);







WHEREAS, the Maturity Date set forth in the Original Agreement was January 10, 2012;







WHEREAS, both the Company and the Holder desire to amend the terms of the Original Agreement to change the Maturity Date as set forth herein.







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein contained, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:







1.           The Maturity Date as set forth in the Original Agreement shall be changed to June 30, 2012.







2.           Other than as set forth herein, the terms and conditions of Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first written above.








	
“Company”

	  	
“Holder”


	  	  	  
	
General Cannabis, Inc.,

	  	  
	
a Nevada corporation

	  	  
	  	  	  
	
/s/ James Pakulis

	  	
/s/ Keith Hoerling


	
By:           James Pakulis

	  	
By:           Keith Hoerling


	
Its:           CEO
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

***URANIUM RESOURCES,INC.***

405 State Highway 121 Bypass, Building A, Suite 110, Lewisville,TX 75067

972.219.3330 Phone 972.219.3311 Fax

 

March 16, 2010

 

Securities and ExchangeCommission

450 5th Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002

 

I, Thomas H. Ehrlich,Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Uranium Resources, Inc.(the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)  The Annual Report on Form 10-K ofthe Company for the period ended December 31, 2009 which thiscertification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| */s/* Thomas H. Ehrlich                     |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Thomas H. Ehrlich                           |   |
| Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |   |
| March 16, 2010                         |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 12

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                    DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION
        Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


                                           Year Ended December 31,
                                        -----------------------------
                                        1996        1995         1994
                                        ----        ----         ----

<S>                                <C>            <C>          <C>
Earnings before income taxes       $59,298,532    25,621,899   21,356,711

Add:
     Interest expense                5,276,527     7,051,142    5,438,911
     Distributions on preferred
      securities of subsidiary trust 4,753,125             -            -
     Amortization of costs incurred
      in connection with the
      offering of the preferred
      securities of subsidiary trust    82,003             -             -
     Estimated interest factor of
      operating lease payments         190,726       182,129       173,923
                                      --------      --------      --------
Earnings, as adjusted (A)          $69,600,913    32,855,170    26,969,545
                                   ===========    ==========    ==========
Fixed charges:
     Interest costs incurred         5,276,527     7,051,142     5,438,911
     Distributions on preferred
      securities of subsidiary
      trust                          4,753,125             -             -
     Amortization of costs incurred
      in connection with the offering
      of the preferred securities of
      subsidiary trust                  82,003             -             -
     Estimated interest factor of
      operating lease payments         190,726       182,129       173,923
                                      --------      --------      --------
Total fixed charges (B)            $10,302,381     7,233,271     5,612,834
                                   ===========     =========     =========
Ratio of earnings to fixed
 charges (A)/(B)                          6.76          4.54          4.80
                                          ====          ====          ====
</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.48





Exhibit 10.48




Summary of Compensatory Arrangement between Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. and John V. Giovenco




John V. Giovenco shall be entitled to receive $75,000 per month as compensation for his
service as Interim Chief Executive Officer of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”),
retroactive to November 7, 2009. In addition, Mr. Giovenco received fully vested options on
November 24, 2009 and February 8, 2010, covering 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for
each grant. The exercise price for each option was the closing price of the Company’s common stock
on the date of grant. The options will be exercisable until one year following Mr. Giovenco’s
cessation of service as a director for any reason, but in no event shall the options be exercisable
more than ten years from the date of grant. At the end of Mr. Giovenco’s term as Interim Chief
Executive Officer, Mr. Giovenco shall be eligible to receive a discretionary bonus as determined by
the Board of Directors of the Company.
<PAGE>
                                                            EXH 23.1




                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT


We hereby consent to the use of our reports dated March 31, 1997, 
accompanying the consolidated financial statements of Renaissance 
Entertainment Corporation as of December 31, 1996, March 31, 1996 and 1995, 
included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K and to the incorporation 
by reference of the aforementioned financial statements in Registration No. 
33-90044 for the 1993 Stock Incentive Plan, Registration No. 33-97388 also 
for the 1993 Stock Incentive Plan, and Registration No. 333-21479 for sales 
by certain Selling Shareholders, and Registration No. 333-17167 for the 1996 
Consultant Compensation Agreements.







Schumacher & Associates, Inc.
April 14, 1997
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 24, 2018

No. 04-17-00595-CR

Christopher M. HARBER,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR5166

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT counsel’s motion to 

withdraw. We ABATE this appeal and REMAND the case to the trial court for appointment of 

new counsel to represent appellant on appeal. 

We ORDER the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the order 

appointing new appellate counsel within thirty days from the date of this order. 

It is so ORDERED on October 24, 2018.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of October, 2018.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 28, 2009 

l0420 

Order 

 

April 28, 2009 

138300 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138300 

 COA: 280730 

St. Clair CC: 07-000427-FH 

MARK ANDRE RAY, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 11, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NIGHTINGALE,
INC.'S  DECEMBER 31, 1995 FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         340
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               191,782
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 191,782
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          285,782
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   191,782
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               10,142
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  18,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (8,131)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   357
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   340
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)
        


</TABLE>
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: March 10, 2016 520665 

________________________________

In the Matter of ALFONSO 

RIZZUTO,

Petitioner,

v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

ALBERT PRACK, as Director of

Special Housing and Inmate

Disciplinary Programs,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: January 19, 2016

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose and Lynch, JJ.

__________

Alfonzo Rizzuto, Duryea, Pennsylvania, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J.

Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to

review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and

Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating a

prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding

challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating a

prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this

Court that the disciplinary determination has been

administratively reversed and that all references thereto have

been expunged from petitioner's institutional record. In view of

this, and given that petitioner has received all the relief to

which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see
-2- 520665 

Matter of Rizzuto v Prack, 134 AD3d 1263, 1263 [2015]).

McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose and Lynch, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without

costs. 

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

 June 4, 2010

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

No. 09-3385

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

LARRY D. BILLIAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United 

States District Court for the 

Northern District of Indiana, 

Fort Wayne Division.

No. 1:08-CR-31

William C. Lee, Judge.

Order

Our opinion in this appeal, 600 F.3d 791 (7th Cir. 2010), concluded that Billian’s 

conviction is valid but, after identifying an error in the Guidelines calculation, ordered a 

limited remand “so that the district judge can tell us whether the error in converting 

pounds to kilograms affected the exercise of discretion in sentencing. If the judge 

answers yes, we will remand for a full resentencing; if the judge answers no, we will 

affirm Billian’s sentence.” The district judge has informed us that the error did affect 

Billian’s sentence. Therefore, although Billian’s conviction is affirmed, his sentence is 

now vacated, and the case is remanded for resentencing. The mandate will issue 

immediately.

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with 

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
a6622311_ex10n3.htm


 


Exhibit 10-N-3












Annual Incentive Compensation Plan Metrics for 2011












On February 25, 2011, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved the specific performance goals and business criteria to be used for purposes of determining any future cash awards for 2011 for participants, including executive officers, under the Company's shareholder-approved Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008).  For most participants, the performance criteria and weightings to be used for 2011 under the plan include attaining specified levels of:








	
  

	
●

	
total Company pre-tax profits* (35%),













	
  

	
●

	
total Company Automotive operating-related cash flow* (35%),













	
  

	
●

	
relevant business unit cost performance (10%),













	
  

	
●

	
relevant business unit market shares (10%), and













	
  

	
●

	
relevant business unit quality metrics (10%).












For some participants, including certain executive officers, whose job responsibilities encompass multiple business units, the performance criteria to be used for 2011 under the plan include attaining specified levels of:








	
  

	
●

	
total Company pre-tax profits* (35%),













	
  

	
●

	
total Company Automotive operating-related cash flow* (35%),













	
  

	
●

	
total Company cost performance (10%),













	
  

	
●

	
total Company market shares (10%), and













	
  

	
●

	
total Company quality metrics (10%).












Based on business performance results for 2011 against the targeted levels established for each metric, the Compensation Committee will determine the percentage of the target award that is earned, which could range between 0% and 200% depending on actual performance achieved relative to the target levels.






















* Excludes special items
---



|EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Lease Equity Appreciation Fund I, L.P. (the
Fund) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Robert K. Moskovitz, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of LEAF Financial Corporation, the General
Partner of the Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Dated: November 15, 2004/s/ Robert K. Moskovitz
           Robert K. Moskovitz
           Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of LEAF Financial Corporation
           (the General Partner)
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
Exhibit 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

List of subsidiary corporations, each of which is wholly-owned by the
Registrant:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                     NAME                              STATE OF INCORPORATION
                     ----                              ----------------------

           <S>                                              <C>
            Midview Drug, Inc.                              New York
           *Embee Drug, Inc.                                New York
           *Riverview Pharmacy, Inc.                        New York
            Citiview Drug, Inc.                             New York
           *Westview Drug Corp., Inc.                       New York
           *Eastview 87th Street, Inc.                      New York
           *Brittany Chemists, Inc.                         New York
           *Villageview Pharmacy, Inc.                      New York
            Towerview, Inc.                                 New York
            Accuhealth Home Care, Inc.                      Delaware
</TABLE>


*Inactive
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

DAVID JIMENEZ, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2180 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed March 6, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Nancy Moate Ley, Judge. David Jimenez, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
VILLANTI, SLEET, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.