alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Akio Ariura, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of AMDL, Inc.2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis annual report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the small business issuer and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is beingprepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on suchevaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date:June 20, 2007   /s/ Akio Ariura   Akio Ariura  Chief Financial Officer
Summary of Non-Employee Directors Cash Compensation Fees



 Exhibit 10.10 
 Fisher Communications, Inc. 
 Summary of Non-Employee Director Cash
Compensation Fees 
 Fisher Communications, Inc. non-employee directors receive the following cash compensation for their director service,
effective January 1, 2011: 
  

					
	 	  	Amount ($)	 
	 Annual Board Retainer
	  			
	 Chairman
	  	 	65,000	  
	 All other directors
	  	 	30,000	  
	 Additional Annual Committee Chair Retainers
	  			
	 Audit Committee
	  	 	10,000	  
	 Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee
	  	 	5,000	  
	 Compensation Committee
	  	 	7,500	  
	 Board Meeting Fees (per meeting attended)
	  	 	1,000	  
	 Committee Meeting Fees (per meeting attended)
	  	 	1,000
**Exhibit 32**

AMANASU TECHNO HOLDINGS CORPORATION**Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer			Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,			As Adopted Pursuant to			Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

		  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of          the registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the registrant's          Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the period ended March 31 2011 (the "Form          10Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form          10Q, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition          and results of operations of the registrant.		

 Dated: June 20, 2011
			 By: /s/ Atsushi Maki					Atsushi Maki					Chairman & Chief Executive Officer			 By: /s/ Lina Lei					Lina Lei					Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Ambus, Inc., Doing Business as Winston American Coach, et al., Petitioners, v Commissioner, New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, Respondent.

[719 NYS2d 702]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner, New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, dated April 30, 1999, which, after a hearing, sustained various charges against the petitioners and imposed penalties.

Adjudged that the petition is granted, on the law, without costs or disbursements, to the extent that the determination with respect to Charge No. 9 of Case No. BDCU96-182 against Ambus, Inc., d/b/a Winston American Coach, and Charge No. 5 of Case No. BDCU96-183 against Winston American Transportation, Inc., which found violations of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 509-g (1) and 15 NYCRR 6.11 and 6.12, is annulled, the penalties imposed with respect to those charges are vacated, those charges are dismissed, the determination is otherwise confirmed, and the proceeding is otherwise dismissed on the merits.

Judicial review of a determination rendered by an administrative body after a hearing is limited to whether that determination is supported by substantial evidence upon the entire record *(see,*CPLR 7803 [4]; *300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. Of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176; *Matter of Liuzzo v State of N. Y. Dept. of Motor Vehicles Appeals Bd.,*209 AD2d 618). The respondent’s determination imposing penalties against the petitioners for their failure to file a pre-employment physical examination of a driver purportedly in their employ was not based upon substantial evidence, inasmuch as it was uncontroverted that the petitioners did not, in fact, hire the person named in the charges. Accordingly, the charges and penalties associated therewith must be dismissed.

The petitioners’ remaining contentions are without merit. Krausman, J. P., Luciano, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 8, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50113 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JORGE ARTURO HERNANDEZ-VITALES, also known as Miguel Botello-Hernandez, also known as Jorge Arturo Hernandez-Valades, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-917-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jorge Arturo Hernandez-Vitales raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 49 (Monday, March 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11097-11098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5552]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-750-000]


Windy Flats Partners, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

March 9, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Windy Flats Partners, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is March 30, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.

[[Page 11098]]

    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance 
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#692f2c3b2a26070500070c3a1c1919061b1d290f0c1b0a470e061f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="88cecddacbc7e6e4e1e6eddbfdf8f8e7fafcc8eeedfaeba6efe7fe">[email protected]</span></a>. 
or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

 Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-5552 Filed 3-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hopewell Acquisition Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Gary Huang, President and CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

   (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
        the Company.


/s/ Gary Huang
-------------------------------
Gary Huang, President and CFO

November 3, 2003
EXHIBIT 31.1



                                  CERTIFICATION
               PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Yonglin Du, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Dahua Inc. for the
quarter ending September 30, 2005;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.




Date: March 9, 2006

/s/ Yonglin Du
-------------------------------------
Yonglin Du
President and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT****PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**(18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350)
I, David G. Fiore certify that:
1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of American Achievement Corporation and AACGroup Holding Corp.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;
4. The registrants’ other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the registrants and have;
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrants, including their consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants’ internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrants’ most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants’ internal control overfinancial reporting;
5. The registrants’ other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants’ auditors and the auditcommittee of registrants’ respective board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants’ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrants’ internal control over financial reporting.
Date:August 5, 2005         By:  /s/ DAVID G. FIORE    David G. Fiore    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
#### In the Matter of Theresa Cassone, Petitioner, v Westchester County Health Care Corporation et al., Respondents.

[773 NYS2d 616]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondents Westchester County Health Care Corporation and Edward Stolzenberg dated December 2, 2002, which adopted the recommendation of a hearing officer, made after a hearing, finding that the petitioner employee committed misconduct and suspending her from employment without pay for a period of 45 days.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

*765Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the meeting her supervisor directed her to attend was not a disciplinary hearing within the meaning of Civil Service Law § 75 *(see Matter of Alpert v Grecco,*73 AD2d 710 [1979]; *Donofrio v Hastings,*54 AD2d 1110 [1976]; *Matter of Ector v Salzmann,*54 AD2d 1017 [1976]). Nor did her supervisor’s memorandum, describing the petitioner’s behavior at the meeting and characterizing the petitioner’s prior refusals to attend the meeting as insubordination, constitute a formal reprimand or discipline *(see Tomaka v Evans-Brant Cent. School Dist.,*107 AD2d 1078 [1985], *affd 65*NY2d 1048 [1985]; *Matter of Alpert v Grecco, supra).*Thus, the petitioner was not entitled to have a union representative present at the meeting, or to refuse to attend it if such a representative were absent *(see Matter of Ector v Salzmann, supra).*The determination that the petitioner was insubordinate and interfered with her supervisor’s duties by twice refusing to attend the meeting is thus supported by substantial evidence in the record *(see Matter of Ector v Salzmann, supra),*and we find no basis for disturbing the hearing officer’s credibility assessments and the inferences drawn from the testimony and other evidence presented at the hearing *(see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward,*70 NY2d 436, 443 [1987]; *Matter of Lawrence v Edwards,*261 AD2d 404 [1999]).

We also find that the 45-day suspension without pay does not shock one’s sense of fairness *(see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222, 233-235 [1974]; *Matter of Lemoine v New York City Tr. Auth.,*227 AD2d 403 [1996]; *Matter of Koupash v Board of Educ. of Bolton Cent. School,*72 AD2d 885 [1979]; *Matter of Ector v Salzmann, supra).*Altman, J.P., H. Miller, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



In connection with this Quarterly Report of Hewitt Associates, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|Date:  July 29, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|-------------------- |  |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  |