alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report (as defined under the preceding Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, Gerhard Entzmann,
Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of Quadriga Capital Management, Inc., the
general partner of Quadriga Superfund, L.P. (the "Fund"), certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Fund.

                                           By:  /s/ Gerhard Entzmann
                                           -------------------------
                                           Gerhard Entzmann
                                           Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
                                           May 17, 2004
#### State v. J. W. Crites

(No. 6907)

Submitted January 20, 1931.

Decided January 27, 1931.

*M. W. Gamble,*and *E. L. Judy,*for plaintiff in error.

*Howard B. Lee,*Attorney General, and *R. A. Blessing,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe State.

Maxwell, Judge:

Tbe defendant stands convicted of burglary and is under sentence of five years’ confinement in tbe penitentiary. Tbe *37conviction is based upon an indictment charging him, in the first count, with entering without breaking, and, in the second count, with breaking and entering, in the nighttime, “a certain chicken house, the same being an outhouse belonging to Rebecca Borror, the said chicken house not then and there being a dwelling house, but then and there being an outhouse adjoining the dwelling house, of the said Rebecca Borror,” and of stealing therefrom one chicken hen of the value of one dollar. The indictment is based upon section 11, chapter 145, Barnes’ Code, 1923.

Evidence on which the state relies warranted the jury in believing that in the nighttime the defendant visited the chicken roost of Mrs. Borror, inserted his hand through a hole in the structure which sheltered the chickens and took one therefrom. The evidence further shows that this structure was .from three to four feet long and about four feet high (width not shown). One witness testified: “It looks to me something like a box, with some boards nailed up together.” This structure was not an outhouse nor a' building; it was a mere coop. Theft of fowls from a coop is not burglary. *Gunter*v. *State,*(Ark.) 116 Am. St. Rep. 85. The statute, in making it a felony of high degree to burglarize an outhouse adjoining a dwelling house or occupied therewith, must, in all reason, be interpreted to refer to a structure which is in reality a building within the ordinary accepted meaning of that word, and certainly the common understanding of the meaning of a building would, at the very least, exclude a structure into which an adult human being could not enter erect and in which he would scarcely have sufficient room to turn around.

We reverse the judgment, set aside the verdict and award the defendant a new trial.

*Reversed and remanded.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                     476,949
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           1,132,363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            0
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             1,132,363
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             7,943
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              236,421
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          (506,410)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            277,932
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                               277,932
<EPS-BASIC>                                                10.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                10.35


</TABLE>
March 6, 2014

Discussion for National Aerosols 

Association: EPA’s SNAP Program
Open Dialogue –

Questions and Answers

2
Discussion

• Current thinking on aerosols

• Consumer Aerosols (non-medical & non-technical 

aerosols) 

– Change status for HFC-134a, HFC-227ea and HFC125

– Retain HFC-152a 
Contact Information

4

• Cindy Newberg – Chief, Alternatives and 

Emission Reduction Branch

202-343-9729

newberg.cindy@epa.gov

• Margaret Sheppard – SNAP team leader

202-343-9163

sheppard.margaret@epa.gov
Exhibit 99.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Kentucky River Properties LLC (the “Company”) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Fred N. Parker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|  
(1).

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 
 
 
 
(2).

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: November 14, 2002

By:
 /s/ Fred N. Parker 
 
 
 
**Fred N. Parker Chief Executive Officer**

  
  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



In connection with this Quarterly Report of Hewitt Associates, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                       |  |     |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: February 6, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ John J. Park       
|                       |  |     |  | John J. Park           
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Hewitt Associates, Inc. and will be retained by Hewitt Associates, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as and exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be
considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
#### State *ex rel.*W. M. Stone *v.*W. H. Sears, *Justice et al.*

(No. 7161)

Submitted September 8, 1931.

Decided September 15, 1931.

*Thos. P. Ryan,*for petitioner.

Litz, President:

Relator, W. M. Stone, seeks by writ of prohibition to prohibit respondents, W. H. Sears, a justice of the peace of Geary District, Roane county, and R. C. Cook, from enforcing a default judgment of $233.63 and costs rendered by said justice against him and Fred Stone in favor of said Cook, May 20, 1931.

The process in the action before the justice was served upon the wives of the defendants therein. The returns of service recited, as justification for substituted service, that process was executed “by delivering a true copy thereof to Mrs. *W.*M. Stone at home,” and “by delivering a true copy thereof to Mrs. Fred Stone at home. ’ ’ The statute authorizing substituted service, chapter 50, article 3, section 8, Code 1931, provides that if the defendant be not found the process “may be served at his (or her) usual place of abode, by delivering a copy thereof, and giving information of its purport, to his wife (or her husband) or to any person found there who is a member of his (or her) family and above the age of sixteen years. ’ ’ It will be observed that the return as to each defendant fails to show, among other requirements, (1) *43that the defendant could not be found; (2) that the process was delivered to the wife at his usual place of abode; and (3) that she was given information of its purport.

“In order that substituted service shall have the effect of actual service upon the party in person, the return must show that all essential provisions of the statute authorizing such substituted service have been strictly complied with.” *Jones*v *Crim,*66 W. Va. 301, 66 S. E. 367; *Staunton Perpetual B. & L. Co.*v. *Haden,*92 (Va.) 201, 206, 23 S. E. 285; *Midkiff*v. *Lusher,*27 W. Va. 439; *King*v. *Davis,*(Va.) 137 Fed. 198, 206. “The return of service by leaving a copy of the notice or process should show that information was given by the officer to the person with whom it was left, of the purport of such notice or process.” *Vandiver*v. *Roberts,*4 W. Va. 493; *Midkiff*v. *Lusher,*cited; *Douglass*v. *Kanawha, etc., R. Co.,*44 *W.*Va. 267, 28 S. E. 705; *Capehart*v. *Cunningham,*12 W. Va. 750. “Service of a summons on a defendant by delivering a copy thereof to his wife is not sufficient where the officer’s return fails to show that he gave her information of its purport, and a judgment by default on such service is void.” *Park Land, etc., Co.*v. *Land,*106 (Va.) 304.

The peremptory writ is, therefore, awarded.

*Writ awarded.*
Agreement



 Exhibit 10.3 
  

December 2, 2009 
  
 Steve Filton 
 Senior Vice President & CFO

 UHS of Delaware, Inc. 
 367 South
Gulph Road 
 King of Prussia, PA 19406 
  
 Dear Steve; 
 The Board of Trustees
of Universal Health Realty Income Trust (“UHT”), at their December 1, 2009 meeting, authorized the renewal of the current Advisory Agreement between UHT and UHS of Delaware, Inc. (“Agreement”) upon substantially the same
terms and conditions contained in that Agreement, however, at an annual advisory fee equal to .65 percent of the Average Invested Real Estate Assets of the Trust, as defined in the Agreement. 
 This letter constitutes UHT’s offer to renew the Agreement, through December 31, 2010, upon such terms and conditions. Please
acknowledge UHS of Delaware’s acceptance of this offer by signing in the space provided below and returning one copy of this letter to me. Thank you. 
 Sincerely, 
  
 /s/ Cheryl K.
Ramagano 
 Cheryl K. Ramagano 
 Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary 
 Agreed and Accepted: 
 UHS OF DELAWARE, INC. 
 By: /s/ Steve Filton 
 Steve Filton 
 Senior Vice President and CFO
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

      CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF CTC COSMETICS HOLDINGS COMPANY, INC.

                           (Pursuant to Section 242 of
                      the Delaware General Corporation Law)


         The undersigned, Riccardo W. Cannaviello, being the President and Paul
D. Lemmon, being the Secretary of CTC Cosmetics Holdings Company, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), does hereby certify as follows:

         1. The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby
amended pursuant to Section 242(a)(3) of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware by amending Article IV as follows:

                                   ARTICLE IV

                              CAPITAL STOCK CLASSES

                           "The total number of shares of all classes which the
         corporation is authorized to have outstanding is Sixty Million
         (60,000,000) shares of which stock Fifty Million (50,000,000) shares in
         the par value of $0.004 each, shall be common stock and of which Ten
         Million (10,000,000) shares in the par value of $0.01 each, shall be
         preferred stock. Effective on May 12, 2000, the common stock shall be
         reconstituted such that one new share of common stock shall be issued
         in exchange for each 100 outstanding shares of common stock."

         2. The foregoing Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation was
first authorized by the Board of Directors and subsequently duly adopted by the
consent in writing of the stockholders holding a majority of the Corporation's
outstanding stock entitled to vote thereon in accordance with Section 228 of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

         3. In accordance with Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware, a written notice of the corporate action taken by the
majority of the stockholders has been given to all stockholders of record of the
Corporation who have not consented in writing.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of
Amendment as of May 10, 2000 and DO HEREBY CERTIFY, that the facts stated in
this Certificate of Amendment are true and correct.


                                              /s/ Riccardo W. Cannavielo
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Riccardo W. Cannavielo, President


                                              /s/ Paul D. Lemmon
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Paul D. Lemmon, Secretary
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
I, Mary Jane Robertson, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp., certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Crum & ForsterHoldings Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact, or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report isbeing prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterlyreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures as of the end of the period covered bythis quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that have materiallyaffected, or are likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 5, 2004 By: /s/ *Mary Jane Robertson*
Summary of Director Compensation for Fiscal 2010



 Exhibit 10.18 
 Summary of Director Compensation for Fiscal 2010 
 Each member of the Board of
Directors who is not an employee of Tredegar or any of its subsidiaries receives the following annual retainers, payable in equal quarterly installments in arrears: 
  

					
	 Non-Employee Director
	  	$	50,000	  
	 Chairman of the Board
	  	$	20,000	  
	 Audit Committee Chairperson
	  	$	14,000	  
	 Non-Chair Member of the Audit Committee
	  	$	7,500	  
	 Executive Compensation Committee Chairperson
	  	$	9,000	  
	 Non-Chair Member of the Executive Compensation Committee
	  	$	5,000	  
	 Nominating and Governance Committee Chairperson
	  	$	6,000	  
	 Non-Chair Member of the Nominating and Governance Committee
	  	$	3,000	  
	 Executive Committee Chairperson
	  	$	9,000	  
	 Non-Chair Member of the Executive Committee
	  	$	4,500	  
	 Member of the Investment Policy Committee
	  	$	625	  

 The retainer paid to non-employee
directors is paid $30,000 in cash and $20,000 in the form of a stock award. The stock award is determined based on the closing price of Tredegar common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange composite on the date of grant.
exv10wxay






Exhibit 10(a)




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY

MID-CAREER HIRE PENSION PLAN




     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT to the Campbell Soup Company Mid-Career Hire Pension Plan (the
“Plan”) is effective as of December 31, 2010.



     WHEREAS, the Plan was amended and restated effective January 1, 2009; and



     WHEREAS, Article X gives the Company the authority to amend the Plan at any time.



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended, effective as of December 31, 2010, as follows:



     1. Article II is amended to add a paragraph at the end to read as follows:



          Notwithstanding any provision in this Plan to the contrary, an individual shall be
eligible to accrue benefits under the Plan after 2010 only if:




          (a) Participation. The individual was a Participant in the
Plan actively accruing benefits (or was deemed to be accruing benefits pursuant
to an applicable policy of the Company or its Subsidiaries) under the Plan as
of the close of the day on December 31, 2010; and




          (b) No Severance from Employment. The individual has not
terminated employment, as determined under the applicable policies of the
Company or its Subsidiaries, or otherwise ceased to accrue benefits under the
Plan on or after January 1, 2011.




     2. Section 11.2(b) is amended by replacing “January 1, 2009” with “January 1, 2011.”


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed on December 21, 2010.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Campbell Soup Company

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Nancy A. Reardon
 	 
	 	 	Nancy A. Reardon 	 
	 	 	Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources
and Communications Officer 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	ATTEST:

 	 
	By:  	/s/ Kathleen M. Gibson
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AMDL, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gary L. Dreher,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |                                                                                                                               
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



| |                                                                                                                                                              
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Gary L. Dreher                                  
| |                                                     
| | Gary L. Dreher
Chief Executive Officer
June 30, 2003