alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Boston Financial Qualified Housing Tax Credits L.P. III (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.











/s/Kenneth J. Cutillo


Kenneth J. Cutillo


Principal Executive Officer and


Principal Financial Officer


Arch Street III, Inc., as


Managing General Partner of


Boston Financial Qualified


Housing Tax Credits L.P. III





Date:           June 29, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
John SARVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 105550

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: May 22, 2018

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Edward S. Thompson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Sherri B. Sullivan and Kurt S. Odenwald, JJ.

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM.

John Sarver appeals from the judgment entered on his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find no clear error in the motion court's denial of an evidentiary hearing on his post-conviction claims. We affirm.

*608An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Earl WATKINS, Appellant.

No. ED 105554

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: April 10, 2018

Karelia S. Rajagopal, 1114 Market, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Plaintiff/Respondent.

Kim C. Freter, 225 S. Meramec Ste. 1100, Clayton, MO 63105, For Defendant/Appellant.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

*687Earl Watkins ("Defendant") appeals the trial court's denial of his motion for a new trial after being convicted of one count of property damage in the first degree in violation of § 569.100. Following a jury trial, Defendant was convicted and sentenced to six months in the City of St. Louis Medium Security Institution. In Defendant's sole point on appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in admitting the State's Exhibit 1, a 911 call recording, because it constituted inadmissible hearsay and no exception to the rule against hearsay was applicable to the recording. Defendant also asserts that the admission of the 911 call recording violated his Sixth Amendment right to confront the witnesses against him. We find that the out-of-court statements made by the victim's children to the neighbor and by the neighbor during the 911 call both fall within the excited utterance exception to the rule against hearsay. We also find that Defendant's Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses was not violated because the statements from the 911 call recording were non-testimonial in nature. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit ______

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Graff Pay-Per-View Inc. on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-80824, 33-82806, and 33-93534)
of our report, based in part on the reports of other auditors, dated March 8, 
1996, except for Note 2 and paragraph (a) and (e) of Note 6 as to which dates 
are April 3, 1996, March 29, 1996 and April 10, 1996, respectively, on our 
audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule
II of Graff Pay-Per-View Inc. as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and for the two 
years in the period ended December 31, 1995, which report is included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.

COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
April 14, 1997
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0000834

10-SEP-2014

08:36 AM
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Lease Equity Appreciation Fund I, L.P.
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Crit S. DeMent, Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: 
              November 14, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Crit
              S.
              DeMentCrit
              S. DeMentChief
                Executive Officer of the General
                Partner
#### STATE v. ARTHUR EDWARDS.

(Filed 14 March, 1928.)

Appeal by defendant from *Cramner, J.,*at October Term, 1921, of LeNOIR.

No error.

*Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.*

*Gowper, Whitaker & Allen for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

The defendant was convicted of a breach of tbe prohibition law, and from the judgment pronounced he appealed to this Court upon error assigned. *We*have considered each of the exceptions, and find no reversible error in the record.

No error.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131590 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131590 

 COA: 266448 

Wayne CC: 95-012264 

DERRICK HUDSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 17, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Texas United Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, L. Don
Stricklin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.



                                        /s/ L. Don Stricklin
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        L. Don Stricklin
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        May 13, 2003
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-30269 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARIE FERDETTE ARNAUD CART Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:05-CR-60052-1 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Marie Ferdette Arnaud Cart pleaded guilty to mail fraud. The district court, after considering the 18 U.S.C. § 3553 factors, determined that the 18 to 24 month advisory guideline range would not provide adequate punishment and instead imposed a non-guideline sentence of 36 months of imprisonment. Cart argues that the sentence is excessive and unreasonable and that the district court erroneously based its sentencing variance on aggravating circumstances that were already taken into consideration by the Guidelines. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 20, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-30269

2 Cart’s sentence is reasonable under § 3553(a) because the district court used the properly calculated advisory Sentencing Guidelines as a frame of reference, identified appropriate reasons for the sentencing variance, and made factual findings to support its sentencing determination. See United States v. Smith, 440 F.3d 704, 710 (5th Cir. 2006). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 21





                        Subsidiaries of the Registrant(1)


                                                   State of        Percentage
                                                Incorporation      Ownership
                                                -------------      ----------

Farmers and Mechanics Bank                       United States        100%

FMS Financial Services, Inc.(2)(4)               New Jersey           100%

Land Financial Services, Inc.(2)                 New Jersey           100%

First Plunge, Inc. (3)(4)                        New Jersey           100%

Fishpond, Inc. (3)(4)                            New Jersey           100%

Angell Ayes, Inc. (3)(4)                         New Jersey           100%

Peter's Passion, Inc. (3)(4)                     New Jersey           100%

Atlantic Adventures, Inc.(3)                     New Jersey           100%

----------------
(1)      The  operations of the  subsidiaries  are included in the  consolidated
         financial  statements  contained in the Annual  Report to  Stockholders
         attached as Exhibit 13 to the Form 10-K.
(2)      Subsidiary of Farmers and Mechanics Bank.
(3)      Subsidiary of Land Financial Services, Inc.
(4)      Currently an inactive subsidiary.
Exhibit 32.2


                              PACIFIC STATE BANCORP

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


                  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific State
         Bancorp (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
         2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
         hereof (the "Report'), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
         U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
         Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of her knowledge, that:

                  (1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements
                              and Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2)         The information contained in the Report fairly
                              presents, in all material respects, the financial
                              condition and results of operations of the Company



                                        Date: November 14, 2006

                                        /s/ JOANNE ROBERTS
                                        --------------------------------
                                        JoAnne Roberts
                                        Senior Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer

                                       34
CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
 THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Dahua Inc. (the "Company") on Form
        10-Q
        for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hua Meng, Chief Financial
        Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/
        Hua Meng
 Hua
        Meng,
        Chief Financial Officer
 (principal
        financial officer and
 principal
        accounting officer)
 
 Date:
        August 14, 2008
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          I, Steven Dinetz, as Chief Executive Officer of NextMedia Operating, Inc. (the“**Company**”) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

          (1)   the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the“**Report**”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

          Dated:  August 13, 2003

|   | /s/ STEVEN DINETZ                                         |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                           |   |
|   | **Steven Dinetz  Chief Executive Officer of the Company** |   |
**OMB Support Statement**  **Student Messaging in GEAR UP**

**Abt Associates Inc. Appendix**  **E .**  **Student Survey Email Reminder**  ▌ **pg E**  **- 1**  

# Ap **pendix E**  **. Student**  **Surve y**  **Email Reminder OMB Support**  **Statement Student Messaging in GEAR UP** 

**Abt Associates Inc. Appendix**  **E .**  **Student Survey Email Reminder**  ▌ **pg E**  **- 2**  

### Dear [RESPONDENT NAME], As you may be aware, your high school is participating in the Study of Student Messaging in GEAR UP . The goal of the study is to better understand what strategies work best to increase the number of students who enroll in and persist at college . Y ou have been select ed to participate in the survey that will be part of this study! The U.S. Dep artment of Education would like to know about your experiences preparing for college and your college plans . Your answers will help improve college transition support services provided to students like you . Please follow the link below to begin and complete the survey. **http://www.XXXXX.com Login ID: XXXX**  **Password: XXXXXXXX** Your participation in the survey is voluntary and you may choose not to answer a question or to stop at any point . You can take part in Upward Bound even if you do not take the survey. The survey should take about 1 5 minutes to complete. We know your time is valuable and thank you in advance for completing this survey! Sincerely, Alina Martinez, Ed.D. Study Project Director

**Study Contacts**  **Study Website: www. XXXXX**  **.com Study Email: XXXXX** **@abtassoc.com Study Toll**  **- Free Number: 1**  **- XXX**  **- XXX** **- XXXX**  Protecting your privacy is very important to us. The study reports will not include your name or the name of your high school . We will not share information that identifies your to anyone outside the study team, except as required by law. If you have any questions about participating in the study, please call 1 - 855 -489 - 0480, or email UBDemo @abtasso ciates.com . If you have any questions about subjects’ rights, please contact Abt’s I nstitutional Review Board Administrator, Katie Speanburg, by phon e at 1 - (877) 520 - 6835 [toll - free number]. If you have questions about the UB program, please contact your school directly. Per the policies and procedures required by the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002, Title I, Part E, Section 183, response s to this data collection will be used only for statistical purposes. The reports prepared for this study will summarize findings across the sample and will not associate responses with a specific program, district, or individual. Any willful disclosure of such information for nonstatistical purposes, except as required by law, is a class E felony.
STATE of North Carolina v. Keith Alban MOODY

No. COA18-1216

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 16, 2019

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5546 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5546

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
     To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed in 
  Greenville, South Carolina, as the ``Carroll A. Campbell, Jr. United 
                          States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
    The United States courthouse to be constructed in Greenville, South 
Carolina, building number SC0017ZZ, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Carroll A. Campbell, Jr. United States Courthouse''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Carroll A. 
Campbell, Jr. United States Courthouse''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 31.1
 
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 By:

/s/ Nigel JamesNigel JamesPresident and Principal Executive OfficerAugust 13, 2008 E-2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended September
30, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         162,761
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  871,648
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,687,797
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,987,502
<PP&E>                                         303,414
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,217,958
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          164,595
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,051,698
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,071)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,217,958
<SALES>                                      3,424,589
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,424,589
<CGS>                                        1,840,130        
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,680,744
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (88,095)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (12,979)      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (75,116)      
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (75,116)      
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.01)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)
        


</TABLE>