alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CHARLESTON.

#### Lee *v.*City of Elkins.

Submitted September 9, 1924.

Decided September 16, 1924.

Appeal and *Ekbok*— Supreme *Court of Appeals Gamnot Review Ruling on Demurrer on Certificate, Where Bill Dismissed.*

Where the circuit court sustains a demurrer to a hill and dismisses the hill, the latter order is final and appealable, and this court has no jurisdiction to review the ruling upon the demurrer on certificate, under section 1, chapter 135, Code. (Appeal and Error, 3 C. J. § 934a [1926 Anno]).

Note : Parenthetical references by Editors, C. J. — Cyc. Not part of syllabi.

MEREDITH, PRESIDENT :

The circuit court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s bill as amended, and the plaintiff, declining to make further amendment, the bill was dismissed. In the same order the court certified for review its ruling upon the demurrer, under section 1, chapter 135, Code. The order of dismissal being final, we have no jurisdiction under the order of certification to determine the question certified. *Heater*v. *Lloyd,*85 W. Va. 570, 102 S. E. 228; *Gas Company*v. *Shreve,*90 W. Va. 277, 110 S. E. 714; *Marks*v. *Mitchell,*90 W. Va. 702, 111 S. E. 763.

Our ruling will be certified to the circuit court.

*Dismissed.*
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0183

SAT Date: 1/4/2013

Print Date: 2/4/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 2 1 Linear

2 3 1 Branched

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR/CORR-S,E,L,MM; AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0180-5

FATE: Estimations for 

Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

log Kow = 5.97 (E); 

S = Dispersible/0.3 mg/L at 25 C (E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)
log Koc = 5.04 (E)

log Fish BCF = 2.2 (E)

log Fish BAF = 2.7 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption and biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Linear wk; Highly branched ≥ mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: Linear P1B2; Highly branched P2B3

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor from the skin, moderate from the GI 

tract, and good from the lung (analog). Concern for severe irritation and possible corrosion from 

the amines.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 2.8

daphnid 48-h LC50 0.43

green algal 96-h EC50 0.16

fish _ chronic value 0.02

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.045

algal _ chronic 

value

0.085

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for Aliphatic Amines, Amides; 

SAR class = Amides; log Kow = 4.2; S = 0.012 g/L at 20 C, dispersible; pH7; liquid 

with unknown mp (P); effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and measured 

concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

2

SARs Aliphatic Amines, Amides

SAR Class Amides

Ecotox Category Aliphatic Amines

Ecotox Factors Comments: 
 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

38) ll-K- (B) -26 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:49 AM Sheet 38 of 325 
P.2 

7 

IA P} ^ 

II-K-(B)-26 

THE DIFFERENCES BETEEEN THE POLLUTION CONTROL COSTS 

ALGORITHMS IN IFCAM AND THOSE IN ACUREX CORPORATION'S 

CONTROL TECHNOLOGY COST REPORT OF DECEMBER 7, 1979. 

Letter from E. Medine, EEA to A. Wehe, EPArSASD. 

March 10, 1980. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-26
STATE of North Carolina v. Adam Richard CAREY

No. 293A19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 21, 2019

Guy J. Loranger, Attorney at Law, for Carey, Adam Richard.

E. Burke Haywood, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Ernie Lee, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 2nd of August 2019 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 21st of August 2019."
Print	

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ODNI News Release No. 07-24 March 11, 2024

 

#### ODNI Releases 2024 Annual Threat Assessmentof the U.S. Intelligence Community

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) today released the 2024 Annual Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community. This report reflects the collective insights of the Intelligence Community, which is committed every day to providing the nuanced, independent, and unvarnished intelligence that policymakers, warfighters, and domestic law enforcement personnel need to protect American lives and America's interests anywhere in the world.

The unclassified assessment is available here.

 

###
exv10w18






Exhibit 10.18




HMN FINANCIAL, INC.




DESCRIPTION OF 2011 CASH RETENTION AWARDS



          On January 27, 2011, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of HMN Financial, Inc.
(the “Company”), approved a grant of discretionary cash retention awards to certain executive
officers and other employees of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Home Federal Savings
Bank (the “Bank”). The grant of these awards is subject to approval of the Company’s and the Bank’s
primary regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision (the “OTS”).



     These awards, which are payable in three equal annual installments, are for the purpose of
retaining the persons who will receive these awards. An employee will vest in an installment if the
employee remains employed on December 31 of each year and has been continuously employed throughout
the year, or else has died or become disabled during the calendar year. An employee will vest in
the entire unvested award if the employee is involuntary terminated without cause (as defined in
the award agreement) or voluntarily terminates his or her employment for good reason (as defined in
the award agreement) during the 12-month period following a change in control of the Company, but
only to the extent that such vesting does not cause the Company to fail to meet its obligations
under the Troubled Asset Relief Program or to comply with any applicable order or rule of, or
memorandum of understanding with, directive or consent, approval or no objection requirement of,
the OTS or other supervisory authority. The vested portion of the cash retention award will be paid
to the employee by normal payroll on January 31 in the year following the year in which vesting
occurs. The executive officers who have been designated for an award and the aggregate amount
payable pursuant to the award are as follows: Dwain C. Jorgensen, Senior Vice President of
Facilities and Compliance of the Company and Bank, $16,800 ($5,600 on January 31 in 2012, 2013 and
2014); Susan K. Kolling, Senior Vice President of the Company and the Bank, $24,720 ($8,240 on
January 31 in 2012, 2013 and 2014).
#### Al Dwyer, *Plaintif in Error,*v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division A.

Decision Filed April 27, 1928.

*847
      *Louis Allen Harris,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Fred H. Davis,*Attorney General, and *Boy' Campbell,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed, on authority of Sawyer v. State, 113 So. 736.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.
Exhibit 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

     We  have  issued  our  report  dated  August  20,  2008,  accompanying  the
consolidated  financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of
Vasomedical,  Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended May
31, 2008. We hereby consent to the  incorporation by reference of said report in
the Registration  Statements of Vasomedical,  Inc. and Subsidiaries on Forms S-8
(File No.  333-86152,  effective April 12, 2002, File No.  333-42692,  effective
August  1,  2000,  File No.  333-85457,  effective  August  18,  1999,  File No.
333-85455,  effective August 18, 1999, File No.  333-60471,  effective August 3,
1998).


/s/ Miller Ellin & Company, LLP
MILLER ELLIN & COMPANY, LLP

New York, New York
August 26, 2008
STATE of North Carolina v. Deshawn Lamar PERRY

No. 409P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019.

Meghan Adelle Jones, Attorney at Law, for Perry, Deshawn Lamar.

Creecy C. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, Greg Newman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th of November 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
Joseph R. BLUMER, Personal Representative for the Estate of Joseph Blumer, Appellant, v. Joseph R. BLUMER, et al., Respondents.

No. ED 104935

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: September 26, 2017 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied November 13, 2017

Daniel R. Schramm, 121 Chesterfield Business Pkwy., Chesterfield, MO 63005, Robert D. Huelskamp, 296 Market St., Ste. Genevieve, MO 63670, For Plaintiff/Appellant.

Jennifer M. Yarbrough, 8011 Clayton Rd. 3rd Fl., Clayton, MO 63105, Patrick J. McCarthy, 1309 Convention Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63103, Robert C. Withington, PO Box 50351, Clayton, MO 63105, For Defendants/Respondents R. Blumer, E. Blumer & Estate of J.W. Blumer.

Francis J. Elpers, Duke Nguyen, 748 Center Dr. PO Box 404, Ste. Genevieve, *722MO 63760, For Defendant/Respondent J.R. Blumer.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Blumer appeals the trial court's judgment related to the execution of a shared real estate ownership agreement, contending that the death of James W. Blumer, a defendant at the trial court, made the judgment a nullity. Finding the trial court properly set aside the judgment as to James W. Blumer and only issued a judgment as to the remaining parties, we affirm the trial court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
**Exhibit 32**

 

**VITRIX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the AnnualReport on Form 10-KSB of Vitrix, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended June30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Thomas S. Bednarik, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, and Craig J. Smith, Vice President - Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officerof the Company, each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| By:    | /s/ Thomas S. Bednarik                                                                                      |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas S. Bednarik  President and Chief Executive Officer  September 29, 2003                               |
|   |                                                                                                        |
| By:    | /s/ Craig J. Smith                                                                                          |   |
|   | Craig J. Smith  Vice President - Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer  September 29, 2003 |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**IAN XAVIER MAUTE,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 251 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 29th day of October, 2015, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

March 10 , 2022.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00114

- CR

IN RE ANDRE LATROI WILLIAMS , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 184th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1642742



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 23, 2022 , relator Andre Latroi Williams filed a petition for writ
of habeas c orpus in this court

. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Abigail
Anstasio
, presiding judge of the 184th District Court of Harris County
, to set a reasonable bond pending appeal

.2

Relator pleaded guilty to the offense of robbery

- threats. The trial court held the pre

- sentence investigation hearing on January 6, 2022, and the sentencing hearing on January 12, 2022. The trial court sentenced relator to eight years ’
incarceration in the Texa s Department of Criminal Justice. On January 26, 2022, relator filed a motion to set reasonable bail pending motion for new trial. Relator does not state whether the trial court has ruled on the motion to set bail no higher than $5,000.
Original jurisdi ction to grant a habeas corpus in a criminal case is vested in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, the county courts, or a judge
in those courts. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.05; Ex parte Hawkins , 885 S.W.3d 586, 588 (Tex. App.

— El P aso 1994, orig. proceeding). We do not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction to consider a challenge to the denial of bail. Ortiz v. State , 299 S.W.3d 930, 932 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo 2009, orig. proceeding); Ex parte Enrique , 2 S.W.3d 362, 363 & n.1 (Tex . App.

— Waco 1999, no pet.) ; see also Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221(d) (providing that original habeas jurisdiction of courts of appeals is limited to cases in which a person’s liberty is restrained because individual violated order, judgment, or decree previously entered in civil case).

Accordi ngly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus for lack of jurisdiction. 1

1 Moreover, r elator has the right to appeal an order denying him bail pending his appeal. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.04(g) (providing for preferential appeal for complaints about trial court’s action in denying bail pending appeal )

. Id. An appeal from an orde r denying bail pending appeal is separate from the appeal of conviction and must be perfected by a separate notice of appeal. Enrique , 2 S.W.3d at 363.3 PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Wise, Poissant, and Wilson. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Exhibit 32

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


I, Photios T. Paulson,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer of  Vasomedical,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of the  Company  for the  fiscal  year
          ended May 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
          of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15
          U.S.C 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: August 16, 2004

                                        /s/ Photios T. Paulson
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Photios T. Paulson
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer



I, Thomas W. Fry, Chief Financial Officer of Vasomedical,  Inc. (the "Company"),
certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of the  Company  for the  fiscal  year
          ended May 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
          of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15
          U.S.C 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: August 16, 2004

                                           /s/ Thomas W. Fry
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           Thomas W. Fry
                                           Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-8535.

#### David Winters, Petitioner v. United States Parole Commissioner, et al.

559 U.S. 1059, 130 S. Ct. 2370,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3090.

176 L. Ed. 2d 580,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 959, 130 S. Ct. 1559, 176 L. Ed. 2d 146, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 1287.
<PAGE>

                            EXHIBIT 21.1 - SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                Jurisdiction of                % Owned by
Name of Subsidiary             Incorporation               Tricord Systems, Inc.
---------------------------   -----------------            ---------------------
<S>                           <C>                          <C>
Nihon Tricord Systems, K.K.         Japan                          100%

TSC Tricord Servers Corp.          Canada                          100%

Tricord Systems Europe PLC      United Kingdom                     100%

Tricord Systems Europe S.A.         France                         100%

Tricord Server Systems AG          Germany                         100%

Tricord Systems Mexico, S.A.
  de C. V.                          Mexico                         100%

Tricord Systems Europe B.V.      The Netherlands                   100%


</TABLE>

The Company intends to liquidate its international subsidiaries in 1998.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Hewitt Associates, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                       |  |     |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: February 9, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Russell P. Fradin  
|                       |  |     |  | Russell P. Fradin      
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Hewitt Associates, Inc. and will be retained by Hewitt
Associates, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
STATE of North Carolina v. Justin Michael TYSON

No. 253P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2019

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Justin Michael Tyson, For Tyson, Justin Michael.

Kimberly S. Robb, District Attorney.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 27th of June 2019 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Pitt County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of June 2019."
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5258 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain plasma flat panel displays. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 2, 2006 

Mr. BERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain plasma flat panel 

displays. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PLASMA FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.85.01 Plasma flat panel displays 

(provided for in subheading 

8529.90.53) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5258 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS