alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.52

 

22 June 2010

 

 

Stephen Frater

The Global Draw

99 Green Lane, Hounslow

Middlesex, TW4 6BW, UK

 

 

Dear Steve:

 

Subject to final approval of the Compensation Committee, it is my pleasure to confirm our understanding regarding certain amendments to the Employment Agreement dated 1 July 2008 (the “Agreement”), between you and The Global Draw Ltd (the “Company”) an indirect subsidiary of Scientific Games Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, headquartered in New York, New York, (USA). Except as expressly set forth herein, the terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force.

 

Employment Term. The “Employment Term” set forth in Section 1(b) of the Agreement shall be amended to read:

 

“The term of employment of the Executive under this Agreement (the “Term”) shall commence on the Effective Date and continue by mutual agreement through 31 December 2012. Executive’s employment may be terminated by either party upon giving six (6) months  written notice to the other, provided, unless Executive’s employment is terminated earlier in accordance with Section 5 except that the Parties intend for this contract to be effective through 31 December 2012.”

 

Incentive Compensation.  In addition to your current opportunity to earn up to 66.7% of Base Salary as Incentive Compensation at Target Opportunity (“Target Bonus”) and up to 133.4% of Base Salary as Incentive Compensation at Maximum Opportunity (“Incentive Compensation”) through the MICP of SGC, you may be eligible, at the sole discretion of the Chief Executive Officer of Scientific Games Corporation and upon approval of the Compensation Committee, for an additional annual discretionary bonus based upon Company performance and your individual performance.

 

Car. Effective 1 July 2010, you will be eligible for an annual car allowance of £18,000 gross paid monthly.

 











 

Please indicate your agreement to the foregoing by countersigning and returning an original signed copy to me.

 

	
 
    	
The Global Draw
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    
	
 
    	
/s/ Ira   H. Raphaelson
    
	
 
    	
Ira H.   Raphaelson
    
	
 
    	
Director
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Acknowledged and Agreed:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/ Stephen Frater
    
	
 
    	
Stephen Frater
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Date:
    	
22 June 2010
    


 

2
Exhibit 99.1


                              PACIFIC STATE BANCORP

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific State Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2003 (the "Report'), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
knowledge, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company


                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


PACIFIC STATE BANCORP

BY: /s/ STEVEN A. ROSSO                          Date: May 15, 2003
    --------------------------------------
    Steven A. Rosso
    President, Chief Executive Officer and
    Acting Chief Financial Officer


                                       17
| (1)                 | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)                 | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Dated: November      19, 2008 |   |   |   | By: |   | /s/ Eddie      Vakser |
|                               |   |   |   |   |   | Eddie      VakserChief      Financial Officer |
# Fourth Court of Appe **als San Antonio, Texas** 

October 17, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00466

- CV

Pedro RAMIREZ

, Appellant

v.

Frances RAMIREZ

, Appellee

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017

- CI

- 21553 Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presidin g



### ORDER

After this court granted Appellant’s first motion for extension of time to file the brief, Appellant ’ s brief was due on October 10, 2018

. On t he due date , Appellant filed a second
motion for extension of time to file the brief until November 9, 201 8 , for a total extension of sixty days.
Appellant ’ s motion is GRANTED. Appellant ’ s brief is due on November 9 , 2018

. See
T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(d). Further motions for extension of time to file the brief are discouraged.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 17th day of October, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
<PAGE>



                                      Exhibit 21





                                REDWOOD EMPIRE BANCORP

                                 List of Subsidiaries



The Company has the following subsidiaries, all of which are included in the
Company's Consolidated Financial Statements:


                                                                  PERCENTAGE OF
                                                  ORGANIZED     VOTING SECURITES
                                                  UNDER THE        OWNED BY
     NAME                                         LAWS OF       IMMEDIATE PARENT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Redwood Empire Bancorp                            California          100.00%

  Allied Bank, F.S.B.                             United States       100.00%

       Allied Diversified Credit  (Inactive)      California          100.00%

  National Bank of the Redwoods                   United States       100.00%

       NBR Mortgage and Investment Company        California          100.00%

       Redwood Empire Datacorp                    California          100.00%
Jeffrey KILLIAN, Appellant, v. Jason Lee HOLLANDSWORTH, Respondent.

WD 79705

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Filed: August 29, 2017 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied September 26, 2017

Brendon C. Buckley, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.

Kenneth L. Halvachs and Ronald J. Abernathy, Belleville, IL, for Respondent.

Before Division Two: Cynthia L. Martin, P.J., and Thomas H. Newton and Alok Ahuja, JJ.

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Jeffrey Killian was employed by Veolia Environmental Services when he was injured in a workplace accident. Killian sued his fellow employee, Jason Hollandsworth, alleging that Hollandsworth's negligence proximately caused Killian's injuries. Killian alleged that Hollandsworth had served in a supervisory capacity at the time of Killian's accident, and that Hollandsworth had failed to take, or to order Killian to take, safety precautions which would have prevented the accident. The circuit court granted summary judgment to Hollandsworth. The court concluded that Hollandsworth owed no independent duty to Killian, and that the evidence failed to establish that any breach of duty by Hollandsworth proximately caused Killian's injuries. Killian appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).
NO. 12-20-00225-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE

OF CHARLES LYNVILLE STOKES,

DECEASED

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE

COUNTY COURT AT LAW

NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

On September 23, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellants, Tammie J. Williams and 

Theresa S. Carney, that the notice of appeal failed to contain the information specifically 

required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.1(d) and Section 51.017(a) of the Texas Civil 

Practice and Remedies Code.

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(d) (contents of notice); see also TEX.

CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.017(a) (West Supp. 2019) (notice of appeal must be served 

on each court reporter responsible for preparing reporter’s record). The notice warned that, 

unless Appellants filed a proper notice of appeal on or before October 5, the appeal would be 

referred to the Court for dismissal. This deadline passed and Appellants have not filed a 

compliant notice of appeal or otherwise responded to this Court’s September 23 notice.

Because Appellants failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 25.1(d) and Section 

51.017(a), the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (on its own initiative after giving 

ten days’ notice to all parties, appellate court may dismiss appeal if appeal is subject to dismissal 

because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of these rules, a court order, or a notice

from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time).

1 The notice of appeal and docket sheet both contain language attempting to classify this proceeding as an 

original proceeding. However, a mandamus proceeding is initiated by filing a petition with the appellate court clerk. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 52.1.
2

Opinion delivered October 14, 2020.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
3

COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

OCTOBER 14, 2020

NO. 12-20-00225-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF

CHARLES LYNVILLE STOKES, DECEASED

Appeal from the County Court at Law

of Nacogdoches County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. PB19-13049)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being 

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the 

appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court 

below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Nucotec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, EarlT. Shannon, President of the Company, and Scott W. Bodenweber, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, respectively certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
|  /s/  Earl T. Shannon                           |                                                                   |  /s/  Scott W. Bodenweber |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
| Earl T.  Shannon,  President  November 13, 2003 | Scott W.  Bodenweber,  Chief Financial Officer  November 13, 2003 |

 

1

----
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT**


**TO
      18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of **Bio-Lok
      International Inc.** (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended October 31, 2005, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      and the undersigned officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
      such
      officer’s knowledge:





a)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a)  or
      15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





b)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of  operations
      of the Registrant.







**Bio-Lok
      International Inc.**





/s/
      Ingo K Kozak





Ingo
      K.
      Kozak


Chief
      Financial Officer


January
      25, 2005
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ROBERT PHILYAW,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D22-2326

LT Case No. 2013-CF-0375

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Decision filed February 21, 2023 

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Marion County, 

Robert W. Hodges, Judge. 

Robert Philyaw, Milton, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown

Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, 

Daytona Beach, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

EVANDER, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BMR Solutions, Inc. a Nevada corporation
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), K.
John Shukur, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of
his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
BMR Solutions, Inc., and will be retained by BMR Solutions, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
  /s/
      K. John ShukurK.
      John Shukur
                    Chief
      Executive Officer
                    August
      13, 2008
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT FELIX PALENC IA, AKA Fe lix Pa le nc ia M arroquin, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 14-70105 Age n c y No. A091-786-082 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

June 14, 2016 ** B e fore : B EA, WATFORD, a nd FRIEDLAND, C irc uit Judge s. Fe lix Pa l e nc ia , a

native and c itiz e n of Gua te m a l a , pe titions for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a l s’ (“ B IA” ) orde r de ny ing his motion to re c o nside r the B IA’ s orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from

an im m i gration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) disc re tiona ry de nia l of c anc e lla

t ion of re m ova l. Our jurisdic tion is governe d by 8 U.S.C . § 1252. 

# FIL ED JUN 24 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).W e re vie wfor a buse of disc re tion the de n i a l of a m otion to re c onside r and re vie w de novo c onstitutiona

l c la im s. Mohamme d v . Gonzale s , 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th C ir. 2005). W e de ny

in pa rt a nd dismi ss in pa

rt the pe tition for re vie w. The B IA did not a

buse its disc re tion or viola t e due proc e ss in de ny i ng Pa le nc ia ’ s m otion to re c o n side r, whe re the B IA’ s de c ision on re c onside rat ion c orre c te d the fa c tua l e rror that Pa le nc ia ha d sought to c orre c t

in his motion to re c o nside r, and the B IA de te rm ine d tha t the e rror did not mat e ria lly a ffe c t the outc om e of Pa le n c ia ’ s proc e e dings. Se e8 U.S.C . § 1229a (c )(6)(C ) (a m otion to re c o nside r spe c ifie s “ e rrors of la w or fa c t in the pre vious orde r” ); Lata v . IN S , 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th C ir. 2000) (to pre va il on a due proc e ss c ha lle nge , a

n a lie n m ust show e rror a

n d pre j udic e ). Spe c ific a lly , the B IA a c knowle dge d tha t Pa le nc ia ’ s 1998 c onvic tion unde r C a lifornia Pe na l C ode § 273.5 ha d be e n va c ate d, that he ha d be e n subse que ntly c onvic te d

unde r C a lifornia Pe na l C ode § 243(e ) for the s am e offe nse , a

nd tha t the prior orde rs of the B IA an d the IJ ha d m issta te d the sta tute unde r whic h Pa l e nc ia wa s c onvic te d . To the e xte nt Pa le nc ia

c ha lle nge s the B IA’ s c onc lusion tha t the a ge nc y ’ s m issta te m e nt of the sta

tute unde r whic h he wa s c onvic te d did not a ffe c t the ba la nc ing of fa c tors in de ny ing c anc e l lation of re m ova l a s a m atte r of disc re tion, we la c k jurisdic t ion to re vie w tha t disc re tiona

ry de te rm ination. Se e 8 U.S.C . 1 4 - 7 0 1 0 5 2§ 1252(a )(2)(B ),(D).

PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D in par t; DISM ISSE D in par t.

1 4 - 7 0 1 0 5 3
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2005 (the "Report") of Quadriga Superfund, L.P. (the "Fund"), I, Konrad
Koenigswieser, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of Superfund Capital
Management, Inc., the general partner of Quadriga Superfund, L.P. (the "Fund"),
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Fund.


                                           By: /s/ Konrad Koenigswieser
                                           ----------------------------
                                           Konrad Koenigswieser
                                           Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
                                           November 14, 2005


                                      E-5
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K (the
"Report") of Lindsay Manufacturing Co. (the "Company") for the year ended August
31, 2003, I, Richard W. Parod, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I,
Bruce C. Karsk, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

         /s/ RICHARD W. PAROD
         ---------------------------------------
         President and Chief Executive Officer
         Richard W. Parod

         /s/ BRUCE C. KARSK
         -------------------------------------------------------
         Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
         Bruce C. Karsk

         November 21, 2003

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



In connection with this Quarterly Report of Hewitt Associates, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                     |  |     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 8, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Dale L. Gifford    
|                     |  |     |  | Dale L. Gifford        
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Hewitt Associates, Inc. and will be retained by Hewitt Associates, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as and exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part
of the Form 10-Q.