alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements of our report dated February 24, 2005 (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to a change
in method of accounting for certain nontraditional long-duration contracts and
separate accounts in 2004), relating to the financial statements and financial
statement schedules of Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York, appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York
for the year ended December 31, 2004.

<Table>
<Caption>
               FORM S-3 REGISTRATION NOS.         FORM N-4 REGISTRATION NOS.
            --------------------------------   --------------------------------
                         <S>                               <C>
                         333-58512                         033-65381
                         333-100029                        333-68344
                                                           333-81970
                                                           333-94785
</Table>


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 15, 2005
Andre M. SPATES v. STATE of North Carolina, et al.

No. 499P04-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Andre Michael Spates, For Spates, Andre Michael

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of NC

Ernie Lee, District Attorney, For State of NC

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 8th of July 2019 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Onslow County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
The attached materials were presented by Mr. Jerry Hanner of the JM Hanner Construction Company at

the December 5, 2013 public listening session held by the Department for the proposed rule that would

amend various aspects of the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program.  Further details on the

listening session can be found at the Federal Register notice announcing the meeting (78 FR 68016), the

agenda of the meeting, the official transcript of the meeting, and the transcript of the online chat

session, all of which may be found in this docket.  The video recording of the listening session can be

viewed at: https://connectdot.connectsolutions.com/p1keddvwzbb/.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the amendment no. 1 to this quarterly report of Texas United Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey A. Wilkinson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ Jeffrey A. Wilkinson    
|Jeffrey A. Wilkinson        
|Executive Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer     
|October 11, 2005
```
**Exhibit 32

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Vibrant  Health  International,  a
Nevada  corporation  (the  "Company"),  on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending
September 30, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the
"Report"),  I, Thomas H. McAdam,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant toss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                                /s/Thomas McAdam
                                                Thomas H. McAdam
                                                Chief Executive Officer and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
October 30, 2003
```
George Riedel Letter Agreement Amendment dated November 10, 2010




 

 

 Exhibit 10.123 
 CONFIDENTIAL-SPECIAL HANDLING 
 November 10, 2010 

Mr. George Riedel 
 1 Meadowbrook Road

 Weston, MA 02493 
 Dear George:

 I write to confirm an amendment to your Employment Agreement (“Agreement”), dated April 29, 2010. It is agreed that this
amendment shall set the Extended Termination Date (as defined in the Agreement) to be March 31, 2011. 
 Further you understand and agree
that the establishment of the Extended Termination Date above is the only amendment made to the Agreement. If you are in accord with this amendment please sign and return one copy of this letter to me while retaining a copy for you file. 

Sincerely, 
  

	
	NORTEL NETWORKS INC.
	
	/S/ JOHN RAY
	 John Ray
 NNI Principal
Officer


 ERNST & YOUNG INC. 
 in its capacity as Monitor of Nortel Networks Corporation et al. 
 and not in its personal
capacity consents to this amendment 
  

	
	
	/S/ MURRAY MCDONALD
	 Murray McDonald

President



Accepted this 10th day of November, 2010 
  

	
	
	/S/ GEORGE RIEDEL
	George Riedel
##### 



Exhibit 10.2
 SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
NOBLE CORPORATION
1992 NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AND SHARE PLAN
FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
          Definitions




---



##### 



Options
 Election to Not Participate in Awards
    2




---



##### 



Participation
 Share Option Agreements
   Price
 Option Period
 Termination of Services, Death, Etc
   3




---



##### 



Transferability
 Agreement to Continue in Service
 Exercise, Payments, Etc
  4




---



##### 



Participation
 Award Agreements
 Price
 Vesting Period
 Sale, Transferability, Etc
 Restrictive Legend
 
  5




---



##### 



Termination of Service, Death, Etc
      No Right to Continue in Service
 6




---



##### 



Ordinary Shares
 Adjustments Upon Changes in Ordinary Shares
  Insufficient Ordinary Shares
   Amendment, Suspension or Termination of Plan
 7




---



##### 



Effectiveness
 Paragraph Headings
 Gender
  NOBLE CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ William A. SearsWilliam A. SearsChairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer 8
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, D. James (Jim) MacKenzie, certify that;

(1)          I have reviewed this report on Form10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 of Nordic Nickel Ltd.;

(2)          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)          The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)          designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)          evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)          disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)          The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)          any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  

Date:     August 13, 2007

/s/ D. James (Jim) MacKenzie

___________________________________ 

By:        D. James (Jim) MacKenzie
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
10-KSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 FOR USA INTERNATIONAL
CHEMICAL, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                        3,610                              
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              3,610
<PP&E>                                            0
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                3,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                         13
<OTHER-SE>                                    3,597
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  3,610
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  0
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             11,114
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (11,114)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (11,914)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                (11,914)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)  
        

</TABLE>
J~"SfD ST,yJ~

iS 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

o e WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

0 

4 PROS~G~ 2 

JUL 2 3 2013 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Mr. J. R. Stroble 

Director, National TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office 

Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221 

Dear Mr. Stroble: 

We received your letter dated July 23, 2013, requesting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 

(EPA's) concurrence on the draft recertification memo the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) plans to issue 

to the Central Characterization Project (CCP) at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). We 

concur with the draft recertification memo to recertify ORNL's TRU waste characterization program 

with the following stipulation. Since July 2011, ORNL's TRU waste characterization program has been 

suspended. Therefore, EPA must be notified when ORNL-CCP again begins to characterize TRU waste 

for disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). The notification must be sent three months ahead 

of the first anticipated waste shipment for WIPP disposal. At that time, EPA will conduct a continued 

compliance inspection to verify that the ORNL-CCP is adequately implementing the EPA-approved 

waste characterization components for waste characterization and tracking purposes. 

In accordance with EPA regulations at 40 CFR 194.8 (69 FR 42571-42583), on August 21, 2008, EPA 

approved ORNL's contact-handled (CH) transuranic (TRU) waste characterization program (See EPA 

Air pocket No. A-98-49, II-A4-103) and on February 3, 2009, EPA approved ORNL's remote-handled 

(RH) TRU waste characterization program (See EPA Air pocket No. A-98-49, II-A4-111). 

Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft recertification memo for ORNLCCP. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Rajani Joglekar (202-343-9462) or Ed 

Feltcorn (202-343-9422). 

Sincerely, 

~Z 

Edward Feltcorn 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable o Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100°/, Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: (Electronic Distribution) 

Alton Harris, DOE HQ EM 

Joe Franco, CBFO 

Norma Castaneda, CBFO NTP 

Marcus Pinzel, CBFO NTP 

Tom Morgan, CBFO NTP 

Lloyd Generette, EPA Region 4 

Trais Kliphuis, NMED 

Site Documents, CBFO 

Jon Edwards, EPA 

Tom Peake, EPA 

Raymond Lee, EPA
Howard HARMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 80333

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: July 3, 2018

Laura Grether Martin, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Division Three: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge

**ORDER**

Per curiam:

Howard Harmon ("Harmon") appeals the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 amended motion for post-conviction relief by the Circuit Court of Jackson County. Harmon was convicted, following a jury trial, of murder in the first degree, section 565.020, robbery in the first degree, section 569.020, and two counts of armed criminal action, section 569.020. In his Rule 29.15 motion, as relevant to this appeal, Harmon claimed that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to properly object to the testimony of the robbery victim and the sister of the deceased victim. For reasons explained more fully in a memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
STATE of North Carolina, v. Willie Tremaine BOBBITT, Defendant.

No. COA19-9

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 3, 2019

NO ERROR.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Buddy W. COLLINS, Appellant.

WD 80427

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: April 24, 2018

Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Evan J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

David A. Kelly, Lee's Summit, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Before Division IV: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Chief Judge, and Alok Ahuja and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judges

**Order**

Per Curiam:

Mr. Buddy Collins appeals from his judgment of conviction, following a bench trial, by the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, on one count of first-degree statutory sodomy. On appeal, Mr. Collins argues that the trial court erred in the admission and consideration of objectionable evidence and, further, that there is insufficient evidence to support the judgment. Finding no error, the judgment is affirmed. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).
#### In the Matter of Sarbjit S. Bajaj (Admitted as Sarbjit Singh Bajaj), a Disbarred Attorney.

[721 NYS2d 225]

Motion granted and this Court’s order entered on June 14, 1994 (212 AD2d 174) and the Opinion Per Curiam issued therewith vacated and petitioner reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.
No. 09-600.

#### Yewhalashet Abebe, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

560 U.S. 903, 130 S. Ct. 3272,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1182,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4032.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 554 F.3d 1203.
1. ~’ OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 
IIsoh or pour quution8 ah0916 bo aaswered in tti 

no$atlYe. 

'phou prlnolp&B l re b x l*ill tat.8, y sirrrthe t, aonZLabWOy air tbo 5tatb (lnoludlng aounttrr aa tlm %ta8e*a + 

IF 

tlodk mbaltialon l xOrOklng th0 porcrre 0r 0armignty1, 

the l bsenoo of a statute orcrstlag ruofr lkbilityg and, 6eoonU, 

8b8 l pro88 prorlsloa of the Oowtltritioa (&Mole XII, Sao8latm 

5L 32 ~I% 53). Phore oorutlmslonal prorldaa8 have bua 4lr 

ouue6, aa 3ho ooiart optnioao oonrtmlng thorn hate been cited 

apoolally la 00~ Oplaloa Wo. O-21$5, a oopf or whloh you almAy ' 

haYa la your posaOasfoa. 

Your8 Yery truly 

OSIEP
Exhibit 32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dahua Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A3 for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hua Meng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









|                                                               | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Hua Meng                                                   | 
|Hua Meng, Chief Financial Officer                              | 
|(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) | 



August 28, 2007
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jacinta Sit, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Oxford Technologies, Inc. on the Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Oxford Technologies, Inc.







|                        |  |     |  |                                                              
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |     |  |                                                              
|Date: November 25, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/Jacinta Sit                                               
|                        |  |     |  | Jacinta Sit, President                                       
|                        |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5169 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5169

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1310 Highway 64 NW. in Ramsey, Indiana, as the ``Wilfred Edward 
                `Cousin Willie' Sieg, Sr. Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2006

   Mr. Sodrel (for himself, Ms. Carson, Mr. Visclosky, Mr. Burton of 
  Indiana, Mr. Buyer, Mr. Pence, Mr. Chocola, Mr. Hostettler, and Mr. 
   Souder) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1310 Highway 64 NW. in Ramsey, Indiana, as the ``Wilfred Edward 
                `Cousin Willie' Sieg, Sr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WILFRED EDWARD ``COUSIN WILLIE'' SIEG, SR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1310 Highway 64 NW. in Ramsey, Indiana, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Wilfred Edward `Cousin Willie' Sieg, Sr. Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Wilfred 
Edward `Cousin Willie' Sieg, Sr. Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```