alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5494 

To require the distribution by the National Technical Information Service 

of monthly updates of the Death Master List prepared by the Social 

Security Administration to all nationwide consumer reporting agencies, 

to require such consumer reporting agencies to maintain a permanent 

fraud alert in each file of a consumer whose name appears on the 

Death Master List, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mrs. DAVIS of California introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the distribution by the National Technical Information Service of monthly updates of the Death Master 

List prepared by the Social Security Administration to 

all nationwide consumer reporting agencies, to require 

such consumer reporting agencies to maintain a permanent fraud alert in each file of a consumer whose name 

appears on the Death Master List, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5494 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Identity Theft Protec3 tion for the Deceased Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DISTRIBUTION OF DEATH MASTER LIST TO CON5 SUMER REPORTING AGENCIES. 

6 The National Technical Information Service of the 

7 Department of Commerce shall provide monthly updates 

8 of the Death Master List prepared by the Social Security 

9 Administration to each consumer reporting agency de10 scribed in section 603(p) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. 

11 SEC. 3. FRAUD ALERTS REQUIRED FOR FILES OF CON12 SUMERS WHOSE NAMES APPEAR ON THE 

13 DEATH MASTER LIST. 

14 Section 605A(b) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 

15 U.S.C. 1681c–1(b)) is amended by adding at the end the 

16 following new paragraph: 

17 ‘‘(3) INCLUSION OF EXTENDED ALERT IN FILES

18 WHOSE NAMES APPEAR ON THE DEATH MASTER

19 LIST.— 

20 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Each consumer re21 porting agency described in section 603(p) shall 

22 include a fraud alert under this subsection in 

23 the consumer file of each consumer whose name 

24 appear on the Death Master List prepared by 

25 the Social Security Administration for so long 

26 as the agency continues to maintain such file. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5494 IH

1 ‘‘(B) PROMPT ACTION.—Each consumer 

2 reporting agency described in section 603(p) 

3 shall take the action required under paragraph 

4 (1) as soon as possible after receiving a month5 ly update of the Death Master List from the 

6 National Technical Information Service in ac7 cordance with section 2 of the Consumer Fraud 

8 Prevention Act.’’. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Computer Programs and Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), J. Boyd Douglas, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David A. Dye, Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                                     
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 8, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ J. Boyd Douglas                                 
|                       |  |  |  | J. Boyd Douglas                                     
|                       |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                       |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | /s/ David A. Dye                                    
|                       |  |  |  | David A. Dye                                        
|                       |  |  |  | Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tornado Gold International Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Earl W. Abbott, President (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.



November 15, 2004         By:  /s/ Earl W. Abbott
                               -------------------------------
                               Earl W. Abbott
                               President (principal executive officer) and Chief
                               Financial Officer
#### Sarah Franklin, *Appellant,*v. J. D. Franklin, Ivan A. Franklin, and Arabella Anne Sumner (Also Known as Belle F. Sumner), and Her Husband, Frank Sumner, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February 16, 1928.

*Hampton <& Green,*for Appellant;

*D. M. Buie,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
No. 09-9439.

#### Elmina Callender, Petitioner v. Ross Stores, Inc.

559 U.S. 1111, 130 S. Ct. 2414,

176 L. Ed. 2d 931,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3694,

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, denied.
CHARLESTON.

#### W. H. Scott *et al. v.*City of Wellsburg *et als.*

(No. 6459)

Submitted November 5, 1929.

Decided November 19, 1929.

*R. L. Ramsay*and *W. S. Willcin,*for appellants.

P. *J. McGuire*and *G. K. Jacob,*for appellees.

Litz, Judge:

This suit was instituted by abutting property owners to enjoin the issuance by a municipality of certificates of indebtedness, constituting a charge upon the abutting property, for street improvements after the work had been completed.

A preliminary injunction was awarded upon the original bill of complaint. At the final hearing upon the original and amended bills, answers thereto, and depositions taken and filed in support of the issues, the circuit court, after adjudging that the pleading and proof ‘ ‘ do not show any ground for *equity jurisdiction”,*dissolved the temporary injunction, and dismissed the original and amended bills, “without prejudice to the right of the plaintiffs or any of them to institute and prosecute any other suit or suits touching the matters involved.” From that decree, plaintiffs obtained this appeal.

*204Although it was the duty of the circuit court, having equity jurisdiction in this class of cases, to determine whether the pleading or proof shows the plaintiffs entitled to equitable relief, we are of opinion, from a reading of the decree, that it has not done so, but that it dissolved the injunction and dismissed the bills of complaint for want of jurisdiction to consider the merits of the pleading or proof. Our ruling results from consideration of the saving clause as well as the language in the decree, that the pleading and proof “do not show any ground for *equity jurisdiction”.*Speaking for myself only, however, I am inclined to the view that the decree properly interpreted shows that the circuit eourt did assume jurisdiction of the cause but was of opinion, after considering the record, that the plaintiffs were not entitled to equitable relief.

The decree of the circuit eourt is, therefore, reversed and the cause remanded with directions to the circuit court to determine specifically whether the pleading and proof entitle the plaintiffs to equitable relief.

*Reversed and remanded.*
No. 09-9748.

#### Michael J. Murphy, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1085, 130 S. Ct. 2135,

176 L. Ed. 2d 753,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3122.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1475

JOHN N. DENNETT; GRAFTON G. DIETZ, JR.;

STEPHANIE DIETZ; BRIAN L. BOND, and all other

employees of the Anne Arundel County Fire

Department similarly situated; KAREN ESTEPP;

MICHELE DELALLA; MARA L. EICENS; KENNETH L.

PARDOE; MICHAEL CONNOR; PETER G. STALEY;

STEVEN K. FRYE; MARIANNE C. ANDERSON; JAMES

DAVID KRUGER; MICHAEL J. MARSIGLIA; CECILIA

WARREN; DAVID WILLIAMS; ROLAND K. FINK, JR.;

DOUGLAS G. FISHEL, JR.; FRANK R. STAMM; KEITH

D. SWINDLE; JOHN STEVEN THOMPSON,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CA-96-1448-B)

Submitted: April 20, 2000 Decided: May 1, 2000

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Francis J. Collins, KAHN, SMITH & COLLINS, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants. Linda M. Schuett, County Attorney, John F.

Breads, Jr., Senior Assistant County Attorney, Annapolis, Maryland,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order granting Anne

Arundel County’s second motion for reconsideration and its motion

for summary judgment on Appellants’ claim of unlawful retaliation

in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). See 29 U.S.C.

§ 215(a)(3). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error.

We conclude Appellants failed to establish a prima facie case

of retaliation under the FLSA. See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v.

Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973); Conner v. Schnuck Mkts., Inc., 121 F.3d

1390, 1394 (10th Cir. 1997) (applying McDonnell Douglas burdenshifting scheme to FLSA retaliation claim). Furthermore, even if

Appellants established a prima facie case for retaliation, they

failed to show the County’s legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason

for its actions was pretextual. See Texas Dep't of Community

Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 253-54 (1981).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order based upon

its reasoning stated from the bench. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM KEY PLASTICS,
INC.'S AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENEDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               43,131,344
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 35,634,636
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            80,841,569
<PP&E>                                      98,908,150
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             193,204,342
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      121,064,455
<BONDS>                                     82,520,618
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        94,772 
<OTHER-SE>                                (15,657,341)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               193,204,342
<SALES>                                    217,086,635
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           217,086,635
<CGS>                                      177,634,483
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              177,634,483
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,189,855
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          15,211,183
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,051,114
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,051,114
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,051,114
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    21.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    21.33
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. Justin Michael TYSON

253P19-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 12, 2019

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Justin Michael Tyson, for Tyson, Justin Michael.

Kimberly S. Robb, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*221The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of July 2019 by Defendant for Court to Overturn its Denial of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th of July 2019."
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dennis A. OWENS, Defendant / Appellant.

No. ED 105489

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

FILED: February 20, 2018

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Jay Lee Kanzler, Jr., 2001 S. Big Bend Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63117, WITZEL, KANZLER, DIMMIT & KANZLER, LLC.

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, St. Louis, MO 65102.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Dennis A. Owens appeals from the judgment upon his convictions after a jury trial for two counts of assault of a law enforcement officer in the second degree in violation of Section 565.082 RSMo 20001 and one count of resisting or interfering with arrest in violation of Section 575.150.2 We affirm.

*439We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo 2000 as amended.

2

Since the events giving rise to this case, Section 565.082 has been repealed and Section 575.150 has been amended with its changes made effective January 1, 2017.
In the MATTER OF: K.S.A.

No. COA18-1305

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 18, 2019

REVERSED.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Casey S. WILMERING, Appellant.

WD 80555

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: April 10, 2018

Julia E. Neidhardt, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Kevin P. O'Brien, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge

**ORDER**

Per curiam:

Appellant Casey Wilmering ("Wilmering") appeals his conviction for five counts of forgery following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County. On appeal, Wilmering alleges that the trial court erred in overruling his Motion for Judgment of Acquittal because the State failed to present sufficient evidence that Wilmering actually or constructively possessed the forged documents. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5452 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5452

    To make the National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass 
              available at a discount to certain veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2006

 Mr. Reynolds (for himself, Mr. English of Pennsylvania, Mr. Jones of 
North Carolina, Mr. Daniel E. Lungren of California, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. 
  Ehlers, Mr. Souder, Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida, Mr. Bishop of 
Utah, Mr. Ramstad, Mr. Kuhl of New York, Mr. Filner, Mr. McCotter, Mr. 
Brown of South Carolina, Mrs. Myrick, Mr. Hall, Mr. Miller of Florida, 
  Mr. Jefferson, Mr. Fossella, Ms. Foxx, Ms. Carson, and Mr. Duncan) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
   Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To make the National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass 
              available at a discount to certain veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VETERANS EAGLE PASSPORT.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be refered to as the ``Veterans 
Eagle Parks Pass Act''.
    (b) Veterans Eagle Parks Pass.--Section 805(b) of division J of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (16 U.S.C. 6804(b); 118 Stat. 
3386), is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Veterans discount.--The Secretary shall make the 
        National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass available, 
        at a cost of $10, to any veteran who was separated from 
        military service under conditions other than dishonorable, if 
        the veteran provides proof of that status by presenting a 
        DD214. The National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass 
        made available under this paragraph shall be valid for 1 year 
        from the date of issuance.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.04D

CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMUNITIES, INC. RETIREMENT PLANAMENDMENT NO. 2

The California Coastal Communities, Inc. Retirement Plan ("Plan"), which was executed December 21, 2001, and which has been amended for EGTRRA, is
hereby further amended. This amendment is intended as good faith compliance with Revenue Rulings 2001-62 (applicable mortality table) and 2002-27 (definition of compensation),
and is to be construed in accordance with guidance issued thereunder.

1.    Effective
December 31, 2002, the following is added at the end of Section 6.3.3 of the Plan:



2.    Effective
for Plan Years and Limitation Years beginning on and after January 1, 1998, the following paragraph is added at the end of the definition of "Compensation" in
Section 1.16 of the Plan:



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 2 is executed this 30th day of December, 2002.

| |  | California Coastal Communities, Inc.
| |  | ------------------------------------
| |  | By:                                 

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Noble Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James C. Day, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

November 12, 2003                           /s/ JAMES C. DAY
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            James C. Day
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                            of Noble Corporation
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Noble Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark A.
Jackson, Senior Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

May 10, 2004                               /s/  MARK A. JACKSON
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Mark A. Jackson
                                           Senior Vice President - Finance and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           of Noble Corporation