alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### UNITED STATES NAVY

- MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

F.D. MITCHELL, J. MCFARLANE, K.J. BRUBAKER

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

BRADLEY Q. NGUYEN

GUNNER’S MATE FIRST CLASS (E

- 6), U.S. NAVY

NMCCA 201400429

SPECIAL COURT

- MARTIAL

**Sentence Adjudged:** 5 August 2014

. **Military Judge:** LtC ol David M. Jones, USMC

. **Convening Authority:** Commanding Officer, Naval Support

Activity Charleston, Goose Creek, SC

. **Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation:** LT Do ug Ottenwess,

JAGC, USN.

**For Appellant:** Maj Emmett S. Collazo, USMCR.

**For Appellee:** Mr. Brian K. Keller , Esq

.

**26 February 2015** 

**---------------------------------------------------**

**OPINION OF THE COURT**

**------------------------------------------------ ---** 

After careful consideration of the record, submitted

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report (as defined under the preceding Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, Christian Baha,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Quadriga Capital Management, Inc., the
general partner of (the Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Fund.


                                       By: /s/ Christian Baha
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Christian Baha
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           August 13, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         149,401
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  482,537
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (111,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,601,808
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,468,371
<PP&E>                                       9,296,759
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,505,774)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,390,862
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,953,532
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,781,256
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,390,862
<SALES>                                      6,132,355
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,132,355
<CGS>                                        3,076,507
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,076,507
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,694,488
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             493,901
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (99,561)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (27,581)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (71,980)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (71,980)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Charles Ward AYERS

No. 295P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Sean Paul Vitrano, Attorney at Law, for Ayers, Charles Ward.

Alesia Mikhaulauna Balshakova, Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney Generals, Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*408***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th of September 2018 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 12th of September 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th of October 2018 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
exh10b1-lix.htm


    


      October 22, 2009

      


      


      Mr. W.
Allen Doane

      Honolulu,
HI 96816

      


      Dear
Allen:

      


      This letter confirms the agreement
between Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (the “Company”) and you with respect to
the following:

      


      1.           The
effective date of your retirement is January 31, 2010.  Commencing on
February 1, 2010, and until the later to occur of (a) your 65th
birthday or (b) your termination or retirement as a director of the Company, the
Company will provide you with the following:

      


                        (i)Office space on the first floor of
the Alexander & Baldwin Building.

       

                        (ii)Parking space in the Alexander &
Baldwin Building garage.

       

                        (iii)Administrative support of
approximately 10 hours per month.

       

                        (iv)Access to and use of the Company‘s
email system.

       

                        (v)Reimbursement for actual and
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, including, without limitation, travel and
other necessary expenses, directly incurred in connection with any cooperation
and/or assistance, other than acting in the capacity of a director of the
Company, rendered at the request of the Company, but not including lost
compensation from other sources.   You will be compensated for
such cooperation and/or assistance at an hourly rate of $700.

      


      Please
indicate your agreement with the terms of this letter by signing in the space
provided below.  Thank you.

      


      Yours very truly,

      


      /s/ Stanley M. Kuriyama

      


      Stanley M. Kuriyama

      President

      


      Agreed
and accepted:

      


      /s/ W. Allen
Doane                                           

      W. Allen
Doane

      


      Date:  October
22, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5453 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5453

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the excise tax 
           credits for certain liquid fuel derived from coal.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2006

  Mr. Shimkus (for himself, Mr. Boucher, Mr. Akin, Mr. Costello, Mrs. 
      Cubin, Mr. Rahall, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Skelton, Mr. English of 
Pennsylvania, and Mr. Pomeroy) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the excise tax 
           credits for certain liquid fuel derived from coal.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXCISE TAX CREDITS FOR CERTAIN LIQUID FUEL 
              DERIVED FROM COAL.

    (a) Alternative Fuel Credit.--Paragraph (4) of section 6426(d) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to termination) is amended 
by inserting ``(December 31, 2020, in the case of any sale or use 
involving liquid fuel derived from coal which is described in paragraph 
(2)(E))'' before the period at the end.
    (b) Alternative Fuel Mixture Credit.--Paragraph (3) of section 
6426(e) of such Code (relating to termination) is amended by inserting 
``(December 31, 2020, in the case of any sale or use involving liquid 
fuel derived from coal which is described in subsection (d)(2)(E))'' 
before the period at the end.
    (c) Refundability of Credit.--Paragraph (5) of section 6427(e) of 
such Code (relating to termination) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (C), by 
        striking the period at the end of subparagraph (D) and 
        inserting ``, and'', and by adding at the end the following new 
        subparagraph:
                    ``(E) any alternative fuel or alternative fuel 
                mixture (as so defined) involving liquid fuel derived 
                from coal which is described in section 6426(d)(2)(E) 
                sold or used after December 31, 2020.'', and
            (2) by inserting ``or (E)'' after ``subparagraph (D)'' in 
        subparagraph (C).
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to any sale or use for any period after September 30, 2006.
                                 <all>
```
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11684 and #11685]
 AGENCY: Small Business Administration
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of New York (FEMA-1827-DR), dated 03/04/2009. *Incident:*
                         Severe Winter Storm. *Incident Period:*
                         12/11/2008 through 12/31/2008. *Effective Date:*
                         03/04/2009. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/04/2009. *Economic Injury (Eidl) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/04/2009.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 03/04/2009, private non-profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:* Albany, Columbia, Delaware, Greene, Rensselaer, Saratoga, Schenectady, Schoharie, Washington. *The Interest Rates are:* PercentOther (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
4.500Businesses And Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11684B and for economic injury is 11685B.
 (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Herbert L. Mitchell, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E9-5159 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5320 

To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 to provide for 

coverage under that Act of employees of States and political subdivisions 

of States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2006 

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 

to provide for coverage under that Act of employees 

of States and political subdivisions of States, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fairness for State and 

5 Local Workers Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COVERAGE OF STATE AND LOCAL EMPLOYEES. 

7 Section 3(5) of the Occupational Safety and Health 

8 Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 652(5)) is amended— 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5320 IH

1 (1) by inserting after ‘‘employees,’’ the fol2 lowing: ‘‘including a State or political subdivision of 

3 a State,’’; and 

4 (2) by striking ‘‘or any State or political sub5 division of a State’’. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
#### State of Florida, *Appellant,*v. Special Road and Bridge District Number Eight of Alachua County, Florida, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February 29, 1928.

J. *C. Adkins,*for Appellant;

*Hampton & Hampton,*for Appellee.

Pee Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, consid*388ered, ordered and decreed-by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Flor JOHNSON v. Capree RICKETTS

No. 190P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Capree Ricketts, for Ricketts, Capree.

Patrick S. Lineberry, Attorney at Law, for Johnson, Flor.

Timothy W. Gray, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for P & P of Asheboro, LLC.

Flor Johnson, for Johnson, Flor.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of May 2019 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 24th of May 2019 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
Exhibit 8.1  Subsidiaries of the Company as at 30 April 2002





Air Systems Components



Industrial & AutomotiveAir System Components LP

(USA)

Fedco Automotive Components Company Inc

(USA)Hart & Cooley Inc

(USA)

Gates GmbH

(Germany)Lau Industries Inc

(USA)

Gates SA

(France)Ruskin Company

(USA)

Gates Argentina SA

(Argentina)Ruskin Air Management Ltd



Gates Australia Pty Ltd

(Australia)Gates do Brasil Industria e Comercio Ltda

(Brazil)Gates Canada Inc

(Canada)Gates Europe NV

(Belgium)Engineered & Construction Products



Gates Formed-Fibre Products Inc

(USA)Aquatic Industries Inc

(USA)

Gates (India) Private Ltd

(India)Cobra Investments (Pty) Ltd

(Republic of

Gates Korea Company Ltd

(Korea)(ordinary shares - 62.4% owned)

South Africa)

(ordinary shares - 51% owned)Dearborn Mid-West Conveyor Company

(USA)

Gates Nitta Belt Company (Suzhou) Ltd

(China)Dexter Axle Company Inc

(USA)

(ordinary shares - 51% owned)Hattersley Newman Hender Ltd+



Gates Polska S.p.z.o.o.

(Poland)Lasco Bathware Inc

(USA)

The Gates Rubber Company

(USA)Lasco Fittings Inc

(USA)

Gates Rubber Company (NSW) Pty Ltd

(Australia)Mayfran International Inc

(USA)

Gates Rubber Company (Singapore) Pte Ltd

(Singapore)Mayfran Europe

(The Netherlands)

Gates Rubber de Mexico SA de CV

(Mexico)Milliken Valves Company Inc

(USA)

Gates (U.K.) Ltd

(Scotland)Pegler Limited+



Gates Unitta Asia Company Ltd

(Japan)Philips Products Inc

(USA)

(ordinary shares  51% owned)Gates Unitta Asia Trading Company Pte Ltd

(Singapore)(ordinary shares  51% owned)Gates Unitta (Thailand) Company Ltd.

(Thailand)Sold post year end:



Gates Vulca SA

(Spain)Lasco Composites LP

(USA)

Ideal

(USA)Ideal International SA*

(Mexico)(ordinary shares - 40% owned)Plews/Edelmann)

(USASchrader Bridgeport International Inc

(USA)Schrader Bridgeport Brasil Ltda

(Brazil)Schrader Duncan Ltd *

(India)(ordinary shares - 50% owned)Schrader Electronics Ltd

(Northern Ireland)Schrader SA

(France)Standard-Thomson Corporation

(USA)Stant Manufacturing, Inc

(USA)Trico LtdTrico Latinoamericana, SA

(Argentina)Trico Products Corporation

(USA)Trico Pty Ltd

(Australia)





Unless otherwise indicated all the above subsidiaries are registered and incorporated in England and
Wales, operate in their Countries of incorporation and are either directly or indirectly wholly owned.





+ Directly owned by Tomkins plc





* Associated Undertaking
#### G. E. Root, *Appellant,*v. J. J. Mizell, Chief of Police of the City of Bartow, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed May 30, 1928.

*980
      *Arthur F. Guthrie*and *H. R. Williams,*Attorneys for Appellant.

*Chester M. Wiggins,*Attorney for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant was arrested and charged with violating Ordinance No. 12-a of the City of Bartow, Florida. He was tried and convicted in the municipal court and was sentenced to pay a fine and cost or in default thereof to serve fifteen days in jail. He applied for and obtained from the Circuit Judge a writ of *habeas corpus.*There was a return to the writ of *habeas corpus*which in effect alleged that petitioner was held .for violating Ordinance No. 12-a of the City of Bartow, Florida, in having in his possession'milk for sale from a dairy not having a permit as required by said ordinance. On hearing proofs and argument of counsel in support of the return, petitioner was remanded to the custody of appellee as Chief of Police of the City of Bartow. Appeal was taken from that order.

Ordinance No. 12-a purports to govern the “production, preparation, handling, posession, care, distribution and sale of milk and milk products and ice cream in the City of Bartow and providing penalties for the violation thereof.” Among other things Ordinance No. 12-a requires that any person selling or having in his possession for sale within the limits of the City of Bartow any milk or milk products must first procure a permit from the health department of the city to do so, nor shall such person offer for sale within said city any milk or milk products from any dairy which has not secured such a permit from said city, the said permit in each instance to cost One Dollar annually. The ordinance further requires the City Health Officer to make inspections at least once per month and where the dairy is more than five miles beyond the city *981limits a charge of $25.00 per month shall be made, which must be paid in advance.

No authority is shown to inspect dairies beyond the city limits. It is shown that dairies within the five-mile limit are charged no fee for inspection while those beyond the five-mile limit where no authority is shown to inspect are charged $25.00 per month or $300.00 per year for inspection. The dairies furnishing the milk that petitioner is charged with having in possession for the purpose of sale without a permit are shown to be fifty or sixty miles from the City of Bartow.

For these and other reasons prevalent on the face of the record that portion of Ordinance No. 12-a providing $25.00 per month for inspections made five miles beyond the city limits is unreasonable and void, so the judgment below is reversed and the petitioner ordered discharged from custody.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the ■ opinion and judgment.
No. 09-8516.

#### Leonel Londono-Cardona, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 959, 130 S. Ct. 1558,

176 L. Ed. 2d 145,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1186.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 12, 2018

No. 04-18-00265-CR

Felipe HERNANDEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Zavala County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17-12-03717-ZCRAJA

Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s appointed counsel filed an Anders brief. This court provided the pro se 

appellant with a copy of the record pursuant to his request filed October 30, 2018. The pro se 

appellant acknowledges he received a copy of the record on November 11, 2018. Pursuant to 

this court’s order of November 1, 2018, appellant’s pro se brief was due on or before December 

17, 2018. On November 30, 2018, the pro se appellant filed his first motion for extension of 

time to file his brief. The pro se appellant did not ask for a specific date with regard to his 

extension. By order dated December 12, 2018, we granted the pro se appellant’s first motion for 

extension of time, granting him an addition thirty days in which to file his brief. Based on our 

grant of thirty days, the pro se appellant’s brief is currently due in this court on or before January 

16, 2019. On December 10, 2018, the pro se appellant filed a second “first motion for extension 

of time to file appellant’s pro se brief.” In that document, the pro se appellant again requests a 

thirty-day extension of time from the original December 17, 2018 due date. Thus, it appears this 

motion was sent before the pro se appellant received our order granting his first request for an 

extension. As such, this second “first” motion is duplicative. Accordingly, we DENY AS 

MOOT appellant’s pro se extension filed on December 10, 2018. Appellant’s pro se brief is 

currently due to be filed in this court on or before January 16, 2019. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of December, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
STATE of North Carolina v. Edward Hugh FELTS

No. COA18-823

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 6, 2019

VACATED IN PART. REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.