alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.28


 


AMENDMENT ONE TO


THE COCA-COLA COMPANY


SEVERANCE PAY PLAN


 


THIS AMENDMENT to The Coca-Cola Company Severance Pay Plan (the “Plan”)
is adopted by The Coca-Cola Company Benefits Committee (the “Committee”).


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS,  The Coca-Cola Company currently
maintains the Plan for the benefit of its eligible employees; and


 


WHEREAS, Section 6.1 of the Plan provides that the Committee may
amend the Plan at any time; and


 


WHEREAS, the Committee wishes to amend the Plan in order to add
Participating Affiliates.


 


NOW THEREFORE, the Committee hereby amends the Plan as follows
effective as of October 19, 2009:


 


The following entities shall be added to Appendix A — Participating
Affiliates:


 


Energy Brands, Inc.


 


Fuze Beverage LLC


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Committee has adopted this Amendment Number One
on the date shown below, but effective as of the date indicated above.


 


	
   

  	
  The
  Coca-Cola Company Benefits Committee

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Susan M. Fleming

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
  10/19/09
Clayton BACHE, Employee, Plaintiff v. TIC-GULF COAST, Employer, Self-insured (Sedgwick CMS, Servicing Agent), Defendant.

No. COA18-788

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 20, 2019

AFFIRMED.
| (1)                 | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)                 | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Dated: November      20, 2008 |   |   |   | By: |   | /s/ Eddie      Vakser |
|                               |   |   |   |   |   | Eddie      VakserChief      Financial Officer |
# Cit y o f Rocklan domceofth e 27 0 Pleasan t

Stree t City Manage r ROCKLAND , MAIN E 0484 1 (207 ) 594-030 0 FA X (207 ) 594-948 1 Rockland , Cit

y o f Promis e —Gatewa y o f

th e Penobsco t Augus t 11,201 0 

# OoT-OCT - RR-^-97 W Mr
. Denni s J
. DeVany , Chie f Essentia l Ai r

Servic e Divisio n Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s U.S
. Dept
. o f

Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave. , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 RE : EA S at

Kno x County Regiona l Airpor t a t Rockland , Main e Dea r Mr
. DeVany : - - I amwritin g o n behal f

o f th e Cit y o f

Rocklan dregardin g th e pendin g contrac t renewa l o f Cap e Ai r for essentia l ai r

servic e a

t th e Kno x Count y Regiona l Airport
. I hav e attende d meeting s o f

th e Kno x County Commissioner s at whic h Cap e Ai r

mad e Powe r

Poin t presentation s abou t it s experienc e an dai r

servic e t o resident s i n ou r region
. I hav e als o reviewe dCap e Air' s proposa l t o th e Kno x Count y Airpor t an dfoun di t

t o b e complet e an dreasonable
. After considerin g th e informatio n presented , hearin g comment s fro mintereste dparties , an dmeetin g th e peopl e involve dwith Cap e Air, I amplease dt o repor t that th e Cit y o f

Rocklan d completel y support s acontrac t renewa l with Cap e Ai r

fo r four years . W e believ e four

year s wil l enabl e Cap e Ai r

t o continu e it s investmen t pla n for essentia l ai r

servic e i n th e Rocklan darea . 1 amespeciall y encourage dt o lea mthat Cap e Ai r

intend s t o establis h aticke t offic e o n Mai n Stree t i n Rocklan dtha t

wil l increas e it s exposur e an dconvenienc e t o th e public
. O n behal f o f Mayo r Deborah E
. McNei l an dth e Rocklan dCit y Council , I encourag e yo u t o support

th e contrac t

renewa l fo r

Cap e Ai r

whe n yo u mak e you r

recommendatio n t o th e Assistan t Secretary
. Than k yo u for you r service , an dbes t

wishe s a s yo u mov e throug h thi s process . Warmes t regards
.
Rosemar y E
. Kulo w Cit y Manage r C : Rocklan dCity Counci l Andre w Hart , Kno x Count y Manage r Jef f Northgraves , Kno x Count y Regiona l Airport Manage r
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the reference of our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
Registration Statement Form S-8 No. 333-46629 pertaining to the Employee Stock
Plans, collectively, of Granite Broadcasting Corporation and to the
incorporation by reference therein of our report dated February 19, 1999, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and the financial statement
schedule of Granite Broadcasting Corporation included in its Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1998, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



                                                       /S/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                                       -------------------------



New York, New York
March 30, 1999
CHARLESTON.

#### Louis J. Fink *v.*E. Clyde Scott.

(No. 6572)

Submitted January 14, 1930.

Decided January 21, 1930.

(Rehearing denied March 3, 1930).

*D. D. Ashworth*and *Clay S. Crouse,*for plaintiff in error.

*Carl C. Sanders,*for defendant in error.

*457Woods, Judge:

This is the second time that this case has been before this Court. It is á notice of motion for judgment on a negotiable note, payable to “Lyda & Ridinger” and signed by the defendant as maker. On the first trial the. plaintiff simply introduced the note, and testified that he purchased same in good faith from Lyda before maturity and for value. A judgment for plaintiff was reversed and the case remanded on the theory that since the payee appeared to be a partnership, Lyda’s authority to endorse the name of the payee per his own on the note should be shown. 105 W. Va. 523. On the re-trial the plaintiff introduced evidence to the effect that Lyda in fact had such authority, and further that the defendant had told plaintiff that he got plaintiff’s money for the note. Defendant admitted that he signed the note in blank in order that Lyda might get the money for him. In other words, the evidence in the instant ease was to the effect that Lyda was acting as agent for the defendant in securing money, and that the latter actually received the money..- Under such a state of facts the question of Lyda’s authority to sign the partnership name does not arise. Of course defendant denies making the statement that he got plaintiff’s money for the note. However, by his demurrer to the plaintiff’s evidence he waived his evidence in conflict therewith, it not being clearly preponderant ovér that of the plaintiff, thereby resolving this question of fact in favor of the demurree. *Kelly v. Railroad Company,*58 W. Va. 216. The establishment of the aforesaid fact likewise removes every vestige of any defense defendant may have had otherwise on the ground that Lyda had appro--priated the money secured by the note to a purpose other than that for which it was expressly executed by the maker.

The judgment of the circuit court is accordingly reversed and judgment entered here for the plaintiff for the amount of the jury verdict, with interest thereon from the date of the judgment.

*Reversed; judgment here.*
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Sean M. Cary, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc. on Form 10-KSB/A for the annual
period ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc.

Date: December 6, 2004
By:    /s/ Sean M. Cary
Name: Sean M. Cary
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 4.5



LOGO

To: THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC as Agent

From: VODAFONE GROUP PLC as Borrower

Date:
27 March 2014

Vodafone Group Plc -  4,230,000,000

Revolving Credit Agreement dated 1 July 2010 (the Facility Agreement)

Irrevocable notice of cancellation



| | 1. | We refer to the Facility Agreement. Terms defined in the Facility Agreement have the same meaning in this cancellation notice.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Vodafone is currently in the process of replacing the Facility Agreement with a new 3,860,000,000 revolving credit agreement (the New Facility Agreement), which is due to be entered into on or
about 27 March 2014.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | At the date hereof, we confirm that there are no Revolving Credit Advances and/or Swingline Advances outstanding under the Facility Agreement.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | Subject to the New Facility Agreement being entered into and having full force and effect, we hereby, pursuant to paragraph (a) of Clause 7.2 (Voluntary cancellation), give you irrevocable notice of the
cancellation of the Total Commitments in full.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 5. | Please acknowledge receipt of this notice as soon as possible by returning a countersigned copy to us.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Vodafone Group Plc
|                  
|/s/Andy Halford   
|                   | 
|By:                |  | Andy Halford           
|                   | 
|Its:               |  | Chief Financial Officer



|                                |  |                          
|------------------------------- |  | -------------------------
|FOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND RECEIPT
|                               
|The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc 
|                               
|/s/Bob Ottewill                
|                                | 
|By:                             |  | Bob Ottewill             
|                                | 
|Its:                            |  | authorised representative
|                                | 
|Date:                           |  | 27/3/ 2014               

Vodafone Group Plc

Registered Office: Vodafone House, The Connection, Newbury, Berkshire RG14 2FN, England. Registered in England No. 3802001
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSBof United Wisconsin Grain Producers, LLC (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, J. F. Robertson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ J. F.  Robertson          |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | J. F. Robertson               |
|   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|   | Dated: November 14, 2005 |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Rub A Dub Soap, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2003 (the "Report"),  I, Lisa R.
Powell,  President,  Secretary and Treasurer  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material  respects,  the Company's  financial  position and results of
          operations.


/s/ Lisa R. Powell
-------------------------
President, Secretary, and
Treasurer

November 24, 2003
-----------------
Date
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5466 

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the Captain John 

Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2006 

Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia (for herself, Mr. FORBES, Mr. GILCHREST, 

Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. 

SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. CASTLE, Mr. CANTOR, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. WOLF, Mrs. DRAKE, Mr. HOYER, and Mr. 

BOUCHER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the 

Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Captain John Smith 

5 Chesapeake National Historic Trail Designation Act’’. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 5466 IH

1 SEC. 2. ADDITION TO NATIONAL SCENIC AND NATIONAL 

2 HISTORIC TRAILS. 

3 Section 5(a) of the National Trails System Act (16 

4 U.S.C. 1244(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(25) CAPTAIN JOHN SMITH CHESAPEAKE NA7 TIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Captain John 

9 Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail, a 

10 series of water routes extending approximately 

11 3,000 miles along the Chesapeake Bay and the 

12 tributaries of the Chesapeake Bay in the States 

13 of Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Dela14 ware, and in the District of Columbia, that 

15 traces the 1607 and 1608 voyages of Captain 

16 John Smith to chart the land and waterways of 

17 the Chesapeake Bay. 

18 ‘‘(B) MAP.—A map generally depicting the 

19 trail shall be on file and available for public in20 spection in the appropriate offices of the Na21 tional Park Service. 

22 ‘‘(C) ADMINISTRATION.—The trail shall be 

23 administered by the Secretary of the Interior— 

24 ‘‘(i) in coordination with— 

25 ‘‘(I) the Chesapeake Bay Gate26 ways and Watertrails Network authorVerDate Aug 31 2005 00:38 May 31, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5466.IH H5466

hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
3 

•HR 5466 IH

1 ized under the Chesapeake Bay Initia2 tive Act of 1998 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; 

3 112 Stat. 2961); and 

4 ‘‘(II) the Chesapeake Bay Pro5 gram authorized under section 117 of 

6 the Federal Water Pollution Control 

7 Act (33 U.S.C. 1267); and 

8 ‘‘(ii) in consultation with— 

9 ‘‘(I) other Federal, State, tribal, 

10 regional, and local agencies; and 

11 ‘‘(II) the private sector. 

12 ‘‘(D) LAND ACQUISITION.—The United 

13 States shall not acquire for the trail any land 

14 or interest in land outside the exterior boundary 

15 of any federally-managed area without the con16 sent of the owner of the land or interest in 

17 land.’’. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V EN T H C IR C U IT J ANUARY 8, 2008 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [ DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 07- 1291 4 Non-A rgum ent Calendar

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D. C. Dock etNo. 05 -0 05 63 -CV-KD RICK Y S TE PH EN S , Plaintiff-Appellee , ve rs us HENRY LOVE TTE , D ef en dant- Appe llant .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Appeals fr om

the United State s District Court for the SouthernDistrict of Alabam a

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ ( Jan ua ry8, 200 8)
Be fo re BI RC H , D U BIN Aand BL A CK , Ci rc uit Jud ge s. PE R CU RIA M:L ovette summarily argues the district cour

t erre d in denying disc retionar y function 1 immunit y and pea ce of

fice r immunity

to him. W e af

firm the district cour

t in the denial of discretionar

y function immunity

and pea ce of

fice r immunity

for the r easons state d in its order of J une 23, 2007. 2 He nry Lovette a

ppeals the dist rict court’ s denial of his m otion for sum m ary jud gm en t i n R ic ky Step he ns ’ 42 U.S.C. § 1 98 3 e xc es si ve for ce ac ti on ag ai ns t h im
. L ove tte a sse rt s th e dis tr ic t c ourt e rr ed in co nc lud ing he w as not e nti tle d to qua lif ie d im m uni ty . H e spe ci fi ca lly

a sse rt s th e dis tr ic t c ourt e rr ed in co nc lud ing that hi s c ondu ct

vio late d c le ar ly

e sta bli she d lawund er

the F ourth Am en dm en t standard gov erning the treatm ent of arr estees. He contends th e district court shou ld h av e an al y ze d hi s qu al if ie d im m uni ty arg um en t un de r the F ourte en th A m en dm en t, w hic h go ve rn s th e tr eatm en t of pr etri al de ta ine es . A lte rn at ive ly , he
ar gue s th at

e ve n if his c as e is ana ly ze d un de r the m or e str ing en t F ourth Am en dm en t s ta nd ard , he i s en ti tl edto qu al ifi edimm un it y . A ft er atho ro ugh an al y sis , the dis tr ic t c ourt c onc lud ed S te phe ns’ e xc es siv e force claim

shoul d be analy zed under the Fourth Am endm ent, and conclud ed that L ove tte w as not

e nti tle d to qua lif

ie d im m uni ty . W e have r ev ie w ed the r ec or d and the part ie s’ br ie fs , and c onc lud e the dis tr ic t c ourt di d no t e rr in ap ply ing the Fourth Am endm ent to Stephens’ excessive force claim and deny ing qu alified i mmun i ty t o L o v e t t e . T h u s , w e a f f i rm. 13

AFFIRMED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 17, 2014 

# Order

Clerk January 17, 2014

146724 ( 101 )

LaFONTAINE SALINE, INC.

, d/b/a

LaFONTAINE CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE

RAM,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 146724

v COA: 307148

Washtenaw CC: 10

- 001329

- CZ

CHRYSLER GROUP

, LLC,

Defendant

- Appellee,

and

IHS AUTOMOTIVE GROUP

, LLC

, d/b/a/

CHRYSLER JEEP OF ANN ARBOR,

Defendant

- Appellant

.

______________________________ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant

- appellant IHS Automotive

Group, LLC, to extend the time to file its reply brief is GRANTED. The reply brief will

be accepted as timely filed if filed on or before Febr uary 10, 2014.
Supplementary Deed of Participation for Morgan Stanley UK Share Ownership Plan



 Exhibit 10.36 
 Dated November 5, 2009 
 Morgan Stanley International
Incorporated 
 and 
 Hill Samuel ESOP Trustees Limited 
 SUPPLEMENTARY DEED OF PARTICIPATION 

FOR THE 
 MORGAN
STANLEY UK SHARE OWNERSHIP PLAN 
 Linklaters LLP 
 One Silk Street 
 London EC2Y 8HQ 
 Telephone (44-20) 7456 2000 
 Facsimile (44-20) 7456 2222 
 Ref 01/145/CPeake 







 This Deed is made on November 5, 2009 between 
  

	(1)	Morgan Stanley International Incorporated (the “Company”); 

  

	(2)	Hill Samuel ESOP Trustees Limited (the “Trustees”); and 

  

	(3)	The company named in the Schedule (the “Participating Company”) 

 and is supplementary to the Deed of Participation dated 9 October 2007 between the Company and the Trustees and Morgan Stanley UK Limited. 
 Background 
  

	1	The Morgan Stanley UK Share Ownership Plan 2007 (the “Plan”) was established by deed dated 9 October 2007 between the Company and the Trustees
(the “Principal Deed”). 

  

	2	Rule 12.1 of the Principal Deed provides that an employer wishing to participate in the Plan must enter into a deed with the Company and the Trustees agreeing to comply
with the Plan rules. 

 Participation in the Plan 
  

	3	The Company and the Trustees agree that the Plan will extend to the Participating Company and that, from the date of this Deed, the Participating Company will be a
Participating Company in accordance with the Plan. 

  

	4	The Participating Company agrees to comply with the Plan rules (as amended from time to time). 

 Execution in counterpart 
  

	5	This Deed may be executed in any number of counterparts which together shall constitute one document. Any party may execute a counterpart and this Deed will not take
effect until it has been executed by all parties. 

 Executed as a deed on the date shown at the top of this document. 

 

  

					
		 	1	 	










					
	 Executed as a deed by Morgan Stanley
 International Incorporated by:
	    	}	  	/s/ DAWN NICHOLSON
	  
 Authorised Signatory
	    	  	

  

  

					
		 	2	 	










					
	 Executed as a deed by Equiniti Share
 Plan Trustees Limited acting by:
	    	}	  	 /s/ JOHN PARKER

	Director	    	  	
			
	Authorised Signatory	    		  	/s/ GAVIN DOWNS

  

  

					
		 	3	 	









 Schedule 
 Participating Company 
  

					
	 Executed as a deed by
 MORGAN
STANLEY PRIVATE
 WEALTH MANAGEMENT LIMITED by:
	    	}	  	/s/ ALEXANDER CLASSEN
	  
 Director
	    	  	

  

  

					
		 	4
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dwayne JONES, Appellant.

No. ED 104942

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: January 23, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 22, 2018 Application for Transfer Denied May 22, 2018

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Dwayne Jones appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of two counts of first-degree child molestation and four counts of second-degree statutory sodomy. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).