alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.4

                        DISTRIBUTOR APPOINTMENT IN JAPAN


Pursuant to the Territory Exclusive License Agreement of the Pain Management
Device effective as of September 27, 2007 and executed on October 17, 2007
between Competitive Technologies, Inc. (CTTC) and GEOMC, Co. Ltd. (GEOMC)
(formerly known as Daeyang E & C Co., Ltd.), both parties agree that CTTC
delegates GEOMC to designate the exclusive distributor for Japan under the same
conditions set forth in the Agreement.



February 4, 2011

Competitive Technologies, Inc.               GEOMC Co., Ltd.



//s//                                        //s//
-------------------------------              ---------------------------------
Johnnie, J. Johnson                          Young Hyun Lim
Chief Executive Officer                      President & CEO






























                                 CTTC8K3411015
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 54 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 54

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide reasonable standards 
         for congressional gold medals, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Congressional Gold Medal Enhancement 
Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. REASONABLE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED FOR CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDALS.

    Section 5111 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Congressional Gold Medal Standards.--
            ``(1) Maximum number.--Beginning on the date of the 
        enactment of the Congressional Gold Medal Enhancement Act of 
        2005, the Secretary of the Treasury may strike not more than 2 
        congressional gold medals for presentation pursuant to an Act 
        of the Congress in any calendar year.
            ``(2) Program requirements.--The Secretary may strike 
        congressional gold medals only in accordance with the following 
        requirements:
                    ``(A) Recipients.--Only an individual may be a 
                recipient of a congressional gold medal.
                    ``(B) Timing.--No gold medal may be presented 
                posthumously on behalf of any individual except during 
                the 20-year period beginning 5 years after the death of 
                the individual (unless the Act of Congress authorizing 
                the striking of such medal was enacted before the death 
                of such individual)''.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 26, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                H. R. 54

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide reasonable standards 
         for congressional gold medals, and for other purposes.
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 21, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41470 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN GOMEZ-REYES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-388-ALL

-------------------- Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Juan Gomez-Reyes (Gomez) pleaded guilty to being found unlawfully in the United States following deportation and was sentenced to a 46-month term of imprisonment and to a two-year period of supervised release. Gomez has appealed his conviction and sentence and contends that the felony and aggravated felony provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional on their face and as applied to him. Gomez’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224,No. 05-41470 -2- 235 (1998). Although Gomez contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres , we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Gomez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.
AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5495 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5495

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to add human papillomavirus 
 vaccines to the list of taxable vaccines for purposes of the Vaccine 
                    Injury Compensation Trust Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. English of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to add human papillomavirus 
 vaccines to the list of taxable vaccines for purposes of the Vaccine 
                    Injury Compensation Trust Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITION OF HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS VACCINES TO LIST OF TAXABLE 
              VACCINES.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 4132(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining taxable vaccine) is amended by adding at 
the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(O) Any human papillomavirus vaccine.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) Sales, etc.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
        apply to sales and uses on or after the first day of the first 
        month which begins more than 4 weeks after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.
            (2) Deliveries.--For purposes of paragraph (1) and section 
        4131 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, in the case of sales 
        on or before the effective date described in such paragraph for 
        which delivery is made after such date, the delivery date shall 
        be considered the sale date.
                                 <all>
```
PERFICIENT, INC., Appellant, v. CONTINUANT, INC., Respondent.

No. ED 105743

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Filed: February 20, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 22, 2018 Application for Transfer Denied May 22, 2018

Daniel C. Cox, Nino Przulj, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiff/Appellant.

Keith A. Rabenberg, Micah T. Uptegrove, St. Louis, MO, For Defendant/Respondent.

Before James M. Dowd, C.J., Lisa S. Van Amburg, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

*611Perficient, Inc. ("Perficient") appeals the trial court's grant of Continuant, Inc.'s ("Continuant's") motion to dismiss based on lack of personal jurisdiction in a breach of contract and unjust enrichment action. On appeal, Perficient argues that Missouri courts have personal jurisdiction over Continuant because Continuant has consented to all suits "arising out of or relating to its transaction of business [in Missouri]" by registering to transact business in Missouri and appointing a registered agent in the state. We affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002****(18 U.S.C. 1350)**     The undersigned, Julian R. Geiger, Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer of Aeropostale, Inc. (the“Company”) has executed this certificated inconnection with the filing with the Securities and ExchangeCommission of the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 30, 2005(the “Report”).     The undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge:          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act    of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”); and           2. The information contained the Report fairly presents, in    all material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed thiscertification as of the6th dayof September 2005.     /s/ Julian R. Geiger           Julian R. Geiger *Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer*This certification accompanies the Report pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shallnot, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Exchange Act. A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
27
To whom it may concern

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590

Author

Henrik Balk

Director, GDS Sales Distribution

QI/63, 01053 Finnair

Finland

Email: Henrik.balk@finnair.com

Phone: +35898188225

Finnair comments to consider on Resolution 787

Summary

New IATA resolution is an important initiatives providing following benefits to airlines, consumers, GDS and 

whole industry.

Finnair is supporting Resolution 787 for following reasons;

 Airlines are able to bring desired product and services to the customers providing competitive edge 

against other airlines, provide more personalized offering and general content for consumers that 

are available today only partially in travel agency channel. This is a result of the old technological 

structure used in existing travel agency distribution. 

 Consumers will benefit of more choice of options and comparability between airlines when 

different merchandising options are available for comparability. This will increase competition 

between the airlines providing more value for customers - better pricing and options.

 GDSs will have an optional way to get the more content to the customers and possible to utilize 

new standard and existing travel agency structure more efficient way instead of using the old 

standard based technological system that has been barrier to expand service content and distribute 

it globally.

 Industry is totally benefitting the new XML based standard that enables existing, new technology

and travel service providers to access airline data resulting new applications and services in the 

market – more choices for customers to access the content. The current GDSs distribution field is 

mandated with few players and distribution structure does not allow true competition between 

GDSs resulting slow capability to adopt airline industry requirements on the merchandising and at 

the same time GDSs are charging high distribution fees that are not based on true operational 

costs. New standard will enable more competition in a long run in distribution area that will benefit 

industry in many ways; new players, innovation, more distribution options for airlines and other 

travel content providers resulting opportunities to reduce distribution costs - benefitting finally end 

customers.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6684

KIM RAGLAND, a/k/a Kenneth Watkins , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MAJOR BAKER, Jail Administrator; CAPTAIN ARRINGTON , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:17

- ct

- 03068

- D )

Submitted : December 18, 2018 Decided: February 15, 2019

Before AGEE, THACKER, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Kim Ragland, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher J. Geis, WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP, Winston

- Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kim Ragland appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ragland v. Baker , No.
5:17

- ct

- 03068

- D (E.D.N.C. June 6, 2018) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AF FIRMED
#### C. M. Nelson and his Wife, Martha Nelson, *Appellants,*v. W. B. Hodgkins, and his Wife, - Hodgkins; E. M. Arbogast and his Wife, - Arbogast; and M. B. Jones, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision Filed May 4, 1928.

*B. P. Jones*and *E. M. Magaha,*for Appellants;

W. *W. Whitehurst*and *Kelly Kash,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judg*864ment to be given in the premises, it seems to the- Court that there is no error in the decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ronald Gene NICKELL, Appellant.

WD 80023

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: March 6, 2018

Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Christian E. Lehmberg, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Before Division Two: Anthony Rex Gabbert, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge

**ORDER**

Per curiam:

Ronald Nickell ("Nickell") appeals his conviction following a jury trial for attempted enticement of a child, section 566.151, following a jury trial in the circuit court of Adair County, Missouri. Nickell raised only one point on appeal that the trial court erred in overruling his objection to the admission of the transcripts of his online conversations because the transcripts violated the best evidence rule. Specifically, Nickell contends that the transcripts admitted into evidence were copied from Facebook messages *without* the emojis and thus were not an exact or true reflection of the conversation. For reasons explained more fully in a memorandum *864provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Lease Equity Appreciation Fund I, L.P.
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Crit S. DeMent, Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August
              14, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Crit
              S.
              DeMentCrit
              S. DeMentChief
                Executive Officer of the General
                Partner
Exhibit 32.1




       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
               THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oxford Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jasinta Sit, President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.



/s/ Jacinta Sit
--------------------------------
Jasinta Sit, President
(principal executive officer and
principal accounting officer


August 17, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1



               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dahua, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Younglin Du, CEO and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


/s/ Yonglin Du
-----------------------------
Younglin Du, CEO and President

August 9, 2005
IN RE: Judge RIDGEWAY

52P19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Bruce L. Gorham, for Gorham, Bruce Lamont.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of February 2019 by Petitioner (Bruce L. Gorham) for Appeal from the NC Judicial Standards Commission:

*425"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
Indemnification Arrangement with Dr. Sehat Sutardja



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Indemnification Arrangement with Dr. Sehat Sutardja 
 Marvell Technology Group Ltd. (the
“Company”) has agreed to indemnify Dr. Sehat Sutardja for reasonable fees and expenses that he may incur in challenging potential state and federal tax liabilities under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code in connection
with his exercise of an option for the Company’s common shares.
Michael FORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 105646

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: March 6, 2018

FOR APPELLANT: Susan DeGeorge, Office of the Missouri Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

FOR RESPONDENT: Chris Koster, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM.

Michael Ford appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

*890An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
**Exhibit 32.2**

**URANIUMRESOURCES, INC.**

650 S. EdmondsLane, Suite 108, Lewisville, TX 75067

972.219.3330 Phone972.219.3311 Fax

www.uraniumresources.com

April 30, 2007

Securities and ExchangeCommission

450 5th Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.20549

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003**

I,Thomas H. Ehrlich, Vice President—Finance and Chief Financial Officer ofUranium Resources, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                                  TheAnnual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year endedDecember 31, 2006, which this certification accompanies, fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ THOMAS H. EHRLICH                      |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Thomas H. Ehrlich                          |   |   |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
| April 30, 2007                             |   |   |

 

----
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Leon ST. CIN, Defendant / Appellant.

No. ED 105532

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

FILED: April 10, 2018

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Tory Dowd Bersen, 8008 Carondelet, Suite 102, Clayton, MO 63105.

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Garrick F. D Aplin, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, 221 West High Street, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Leon St. Cin ("Defendant") appeals from the judgment upon his conviction following a jury trial for one count of abuse or neglect of a child in violation of Section 568.060 RSMo 2000. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DAVE MEYERS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3151

)

21ST MORTGAGE CORPORATION )

as MASTER SERVICER FOR )

CHRISTIANA TRUST, A )

DIVISION OF WILIMINGTON )

SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, )

as TRUSTEE FOR KNOXVILLE )

2012 TRUST, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 27, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for

Collier County; James R. Shenko,

Judge.

S. Alan Johnson of S. Alan Johnson

Law LLC, Fort Myers, for Appellant.

William L. Grimsley, N. Mark New, II,

and Kimberly Held Israel of McGlinchey

Stafford, Jacksonville, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 
- 2 -

SILBERMAN, SALARIO, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.