alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10616-10617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5181]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,591]


Gensym Corporation, A Subsidiary of Versata Enterprises, Inc., 
Burlington, MA; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding 
Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated February 20, 2009, the Division of Career 
Services, Trade Program Manager, Massachusetts, requested 
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding 
workers'

[[Page 10617]]

eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) applicable to workers 
and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on 
February 4, 2009 and will soon be published in the Federal Register.
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the finding that the worker group engaged in IT sales, 
consulting and support services, does not produce an article within the 
meaning of Section 222(a)(2) of the Act.
    In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner provided 
additional information regarding activities of the workers at the 
subject facility. The petitioners stated that workers of the subject 
firm produced software which was sold to customers.
    The Department has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and determined that the Department will conduct further 
investigation to determine whether the workers of the subject firm were 
engaged in production of articles and whether they meet the eligibility 
requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of March 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-5181 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### Scott E. Watkins *v.*State Compensation Commissioner *et al.*

(No. 7130)

Submitted September 29, 1931.

Decided October 6, 1931.

*J. D. Gronninger,*for relator.

*Howard B. Lee,*and *R. Dennis Steed,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.

Woods, *Judge:*

Petitioner, by mandamus, seeks a hearing under Code 1931, 23-5-1, in view of the compensation commissioner’s refusal to re-open his claim on tender of certain “after discovered evidence. ’ ’

The commissioner’s finding on the original application for compensation that the ‘ ‘ disability alleged is not the result of an injury received in course of and that said disability did not result from the employment”, was affirmed by this Court in *Watkins*v. *Commissioner,*109 W. Va. 409. As indicated in that opinion, Watkins claimed to be suffering from pains in his head and neck, due to concussion or jar from a “shot” put off by a fellow workman on the opposite side of a fifteen-foot block of coal at the head of the entry, which was being driven by the petitioner. There was a difference of opinion on the part of the medical experts as to whether the shot brought about the condition. The commissioner accepted the negative view. The evidence of John Holmes, now sought to be injected *127into tbe case, is to tbe effect that tbe coal between tbe two entries was only ten feet in thickness; that five sticks of mona-bel, instead of three, were used; and that tbe shot brought down slate on claimant’s side. Also certain communications from Lambie, department of mines, regarding conditions existing in tbe particular mine a year later, to show improper ventilation, were submitted.

As stated by Judge Maxwell *in Nichols*v. *Commissioner,*decided this term, “While it is true that the commissioner has continuing jurisdiction in these matters, Code 1931, 23-4-16, it does not follow that the commissioner has authority under the statute, months after a final decision to re-open and reconsider a case'on facts the same or substantially the same as those considered by him on the original hearing. There must be an end of these matters. A finding by the' commissioner should not be disturbed by him except for good cause. *Johnson*v. *Compensation Commissioner,*109 W. Va. 316, 154 S. E. 766.”

Assuming that the commissioner would give full credit to the proffered testimony, we are unable to see wherein it is clearly of such a nature as would change the diagnosis of the experts, upon ivhose testimony the finding was made. From the medical testimony the commissioner has found that the jar, if any, had nothing to do with claimant’s condition. This was primarily for the commissioner. *Martin*v. *Commissioner,*107 W. Va. 583.

While the technical rules of law should not be strictly ad-herred to in compensation eases, the claimant, in order to justify the re-opening of a claim, formerly adjudicated, should be required to make a showing that would, in the opinion of the court, call for a favorable finding by the commissioner. The right not being clear, mandamus will not lie. *State ex rel. Ferrel*v. *Commissioner,*108 W. Va. 477.

*Writ denied.*
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lease Equity Appreciation Fund I, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert K. Moskovitz, Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                         |  |                                               
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|Date: August 16, 2010 |  | /s/ Robert K. Moskovitz
|                      |  | Name:                   |  | Robert K. Moskovitz                           
|                      |  | Title:                  |  | Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner
[KPMG Peat Marwick LLP letterhead]



                          Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors
1ST BANCORP:

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statement  (No.
33-13145) on Form S-8 of 1ST BANCORP of our report dated July 17, 1997, relating
to the  consolidated  statements  of  financial  condition  of 1ST  BANCORP  and
subsidiaries  as of  June  30,  1997  and  1996  and  the  related  consolidated
statements  of earnings,  stockholders'  equity,  and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year  period ended June 30, 1997, which report appears in the
June 30, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of 1ST BANCORP.




/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
September 25, 1997
ex10-17.htm








Exhibit 10.17


 


Summary of Compensation Arrangements with Executive Officers


 


The following summarizes the current compensation and benefits received by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of RPC, Inc. (the “Company”) and the Company’s other most highly compensated executive officers (the “Named Executive Officers”).


 


This document is intended to be a summary of existing oral, at will arrangements, and in no way is intended to provide any additional rights to any of the Named Executive Officers.


 


Base Salaries


 


The annual base salaries for the Company’s Named Executive Officers are reviewed and may be adjusted from time to time in the discretion of the Company’s Compensation Committee.


 


Bonuses


 


All of the Named Executive Officers are eligible for annual cash bonuses under the Company’s Performance-Based Incentive Cash Compensation Plan (the “Plan”).


 


The Company’s executive officers are also eligible for annual cash bonuses as determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion.


 


Stock Options and Other Equity Awards


 


The Named Executive Officers are eligible to receive options and restricted stock under the Company’s stock incentive plan, in such amounts and with such terms and conditions as determined by the Committee at the time of grant.


 


Supplemental Retirement Plan


 


Salary and Bonus Deferrals


 


All of the Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in the Company’s Supplemental Retirement Plan (“Plan”).


 


The Plan allows participants to defer up to 50% of base salary and up to 100% of annual bonus, subject to other terms and conditions set forth in the Plan.


 


Automobile Usage


 


The Company provides an automobile or an automobile allowance to Messrs. Hubbell and Palmer.


 




  





1











  






 


Other Benefits


 


The Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in the Company’s regular employee benefit programs, including the 401(k) plan with Company match, group life insurance, group medical and dental coverage and other group benefit plans.  All of the Named Executives are eligible for the Retirement Income Plan that was frozen in March 2002.  See Supplemental Retirement Plan above for further discussion.


 


All of the Named Executive Officers are also executive officers of Marine Products Corporation (“MPC”) and receive compensation from that company.  Disclosure regarding such compensation can be found in MPC’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


 


2
Jeffery D. OVERBECK, Petitioner/Appellant v. Amy L. OVERBECK, Respondent.

No. ED 105341

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

FILED: June 5, 2018

FOR APPELLANT: Alexa C. Hart-Lorenz, Adam R. Lorenz-co-counsel, 339 Broadway, Suite 110, Cape Girardeau, Missouri 63701.

FOR RESPONDENT: John D. Moore, P.O. Box 1027, Sikeston, Missouri 63801.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Jeffery Overbeck appeals the trial court's dissolution judgment as it relates to child support following his divorce from Amy Overbeck. We affirm.

*829We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
# Comments of the Gas Processors Association

To Whom It May Concern: Attached please find the comments of the Gas Proces sors Association on the EPA Oil and Gas Methane Tec hnical White Papers. If you have any questions or need additional inform ation, please contact: Jeff Applekamp Vice President of Government Affairs Gas Processors Association, GPA 6526 E. 60th St. Tulsa, OK 74145 918­493­3872 office 918­760­4950 cell 918­493­3875 fax japplekamp@GPAglobal.org www.GPAglobal.org



### Kyle Danish | 

### Partner VanNess Feldman LLP 1050 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW Washington, DC 20007 (202) 298­ 

### | kwd@vnf.com 

### | vnf.com This communication may contain information and/or m etadata that is legally privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intende d recipient, please do not read or review the content and/or metadata and do not disseminate, distribute or copy this communi cation. Anyone who receives this message in error s hould notify the sender immediately by telephone (202­298­ ) or by return e­mail and delete it from his or her computer. 

## Danish <kwd@vnf.com> Kyle Mon 6/16/2014 2:40 PM
To: OilandGas.Whitepapers <OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.go v>; Cc: Applekamp, Jeff (japplekamp@gpaglobal.org) <japplek amp@gpaglobal.org>; 

###  1 attachment Comments of the Gas Processors Association on EPA's Oil and Gas Methane White Papers.pdf; 

### Page **1 of**  **2 Comments of the Gas Processors Association** 
**- OilandGas.Whitepapers** 

**8/ 26/** **2014 https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/** 

### Page **2 of**  **2**

**Comments of the Gas Processors Association**
**- OilandGas.Whitepapers** 

**8/ 26/** **2014 https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/**
Christine A. GRAVES, Respondent, v. Peter E. GRAVES, Appellant.

WD 81010

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: June 26, 2018

Weldon W. Perry, Jr., Lexington, MO, for respondent.

Donald J. Lock, Gladstone, MO, for appellant.

Before Division Three: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge

**ORDER**

Per curiam:

Peter E. Graves appeals from the trial court's judgment denying his motion to modify the child custody provisions of a dissolution judgment so as to give him sole legal and physical custody of his son. Graves argues that the trial court erred in concluding that there was no substantial change of circumstances to warrant a change of custody. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT
      32.3




Written
      Statement of Principal Accounting Officer Furnished Pursuant to


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


as
      Adopted by


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of HouseRaising, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christine M.
      Carriker, Secretary/ Treasurer, SVP and Chief Administrative Officer, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition as of September 30, 2007 and results of operations
      for
      the quarter ended September 30, 2007 of the Company and its
      subsidiaries.




/s/
                Christine M. Carriker_____________________________Christine
                M. CarrikerSecretary/Treasurer,
                SVP and Chief Administrative Officer(Principal
                Accounting Officer)





February
      6, 2008





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.1



WRITTEN STATEMENT

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned, James V. Mazzo and Richard A. Meier, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Advanced Medical
Optics, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certify to the best of their knowledge that:



(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 26, 2004 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Dated: May 3, 2004



/s/    JAMES V. MAZZOJames V. Mazzo, President and Chief Executive
Officer/s/    RICHARD A. MEIERRichard A. Meier, Executive Vice President of Operations
and Finance, and Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. and will be retained by Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2005, (the "Report") by Dimensional Visions, Inc., each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



1. The Report complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Registrant.



|Dated:  September 29, 2005

/s/ Preston J. Shea
-------------------
Name:  Preston J. Shea
Title:   President


/s/ Preston J. Shea
-------------------
Name:  Preston J. Shea
Title: Principal Accounting Officer
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First Amendment to License Agreement



 Exhibit 10.106 
 CERTAIN MATERIAL (INDICATED BY AN ASTERISK) HAS BEEN OMITTED FROM THIS DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT. THE OMITTED MATERIAL HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION. 

 

 

  
 February 24, 1998

 Ms. Victoria Thomas 
 General
Counsel 
 University of Kansas 
 245
Strong Hall 
 Lawrence, KS 66045 

Dear Ms. Thomas: 
 The letter shall serve as an
amendment to the license agreement between CyDex, Inc. and the University of Kansas dated September 3, 1993. 
 Section 7.1(c) is modified
as follows: 
 (c) [***]; and 
 New
Section 7.1(e) added: 
 (e) [***]. 

The above two amendments shall be effective upon execution by their duly authorized representatives. 

 

									
	UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS	 		 	CyDex, Inc.
					
	By:	 	 /s/ [Illegible]
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ [Illegible]

	Title:	 	 Associate Vice Chancellor
	 		 	Title:	 	 Vice President Corporate Development

	Date:	 	 February 25, 1998
	 		 	Date:	 	 Feb. 24, 1998



 
  

	***	Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted
portions.
No. 09-1076.

#### Suraiya Mateen, Petitioner v. James R. Marshall, as Trustee, et al.

560 U.S. 904, 130 S. Ct. 3277,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1184,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3922.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 341 Fed. Appx. 581.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 42 (Thursday, March 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4708]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ID-5929-001]


Hanf, Robert J.S.; Notice of Filing

February 25, 2009.
    Take notice that on February 5, 2009, Robert J.S. Hanf submitted 
for filing, an application for authority to hold interlocking 
positions, pursuant to section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act, 16 
U.S.C. 825d(b)(2008), and Part 45 of Title 18 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations, 18 CFR part 45 (2008).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#25636077666a4b494c4b40765055554a575165434057460b424a53"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="773132253438191b1e191224020707180503371112051459101801">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 12, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-4708 Filed 3-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>