alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23-6

                 [QUESTA ENGINEERING CORPORATION LETTERHEAD]


February 24, 1998



MCN Energy Group Inc.
500 Griswold
Detroit, Michigan 48226

RE:  MCN Energy Group Inc.
     1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K


Ladies and Gentlemen:

The firm of Questa Engineering Corporation consents to the use of its name and
the information contained in this report dated January 6, 1998, regarding MCN
Energy Group Inc.'s oil and gas reserve information as of December 31, 1997 in
its 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In addition, Questa Engineering Corporation consents to the incorporation by
reference of said material in Registration Statement Nos. 333-02105 and
333-02107 on Form S-8, 333-01523, 333-21175 and 333-45281 on Form S-3 and Post
Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-21930-99 on Form S-8
of MCN Energy Group Inc.

Questa Engineering Corporation has no interest in MCN Energy Group Inc. or in
any affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive such interest as
payment for such reports and has no director, officer, or employee otherwise
connected with MCN Energy Group Inc.  We are not employed by MCN Energy Group 
Inc. on a contingent basis.

Very truly yours,
QUESTA ENGINEERING CORPORATION

/s/ Dave O. Cox
    Dave O. Cox, Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 48 (Friday, March 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5488]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-882]


Refined Brown Aluminum Oxide from the People's Republic of China: 
Notice of Extension of Time Limit for the Final Results of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 13, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Goldberger or Kate Johnson at 
(202) 482-4136 or (202) 482-4929, respectively, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 1, 2008, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published the preliminary results of the 2006-2007 administrative 
review of the antidumping duty order on refined brown aluminum oxide 
(RBAO) from the People's Republic of China (PRC) covering the period 
November 1, 2006, to October 31, 2007. See Refined Brown Aluminum Oxide 
from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR 72767 (December 1, 2008). The final 
results for this administrative review are currently due no later than 
March 31, 2009, 120 days from the date of publication of the 
preliminary results of review.

Extension of Time Limit of Final Results

    Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act), requires that the Department issue the final results of an 
administrative review within 120 days after the date on which the 
preliminary results are published. If it is not practicable to complete 
the review within that time period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act 
allows the Department to extend the deadline for the final results to a 
maximum of 180 days after the date on which the preliminary results are 
published.
    The Department requires additional time to analyze the interested 
party comments concerning the issue of the appropriate surrogate value 
for the major raw material input in the production of RBAO. Thus, it is 
not practicable to complete this review within the original time limit. 
Therefore, the Department is extending the time limit for completion of 
the final results of this review by 60 days, in accordance with section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Accordingly, the final results are now due no 
later than June 1, 2009, the next business day after 180 days from the 
date of publication of the preliminary results of review.
    This notice is published pursuant to sections 751(a)(3)(A) and 
777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: March 9, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. E9-5488 Filed 3-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
No. 09-9892.

#### Marshell Cooper, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1112, 130 S. Ct. 2419,

176 L. Ed. 2d 934,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3767.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 93.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 19-40848

Conference Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Roberto Marcus Montes, Jr., 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:18-CR-287-1

Before Graves, Willett, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Roberto Marcus 

Montes, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Montes has filed a response. The 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 29, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 19-40848 Document: 00515582156 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/29/2020
No. 19-40848

2

record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of 

Montes’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to 

consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States 

v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein, as well as Montes’s response. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 19-40848 Document: 00515582156 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/29/2020
EXHIBIT
      32




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
      the
      registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the registrant's
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the "Form
      10-QSB") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form
      10-QSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the registrant.





Date:
      August 13, 2006





Amanasu
      Technologies Corporation





/s/
      Hideyuki Shiraishi





Hideyuki
      Shiraishi


CEO,
      CFO,
      CAO
EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



     We have issued our report dated March 12, 2007,  (which report  includes an
explanatory  paragraph  relating to the  application  of  Statement of Financial
Accounting   Standard  No.  158  as  of  December  31,  2006)  accompanying  the
consolidated financial statements and schedules included in the Annual Report of
FMS Financial  Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. We
hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  of  said  report  in the
Registration  Statements  of FMS  Financial  Corporation  on Form S-8  (File No.
33-24340)


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 12, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5326 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5326

   To amend title 10, United States Code, to increase the amount of 
 educational assistance available to members of the reserve components 
  called or ordered to active service for more than nine consecutive 
    months or more than 18 total months during any 24-month period.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2006

  Mrs. Emerson (for herself and Mr. Filner) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 10, United States Code, to increase the amount of 
 educational assistance available to members of the reserve components 
  called or ordered to active service for more than nine consecutive 
    months or more than 18 total months during any 24-month period.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDED TO 
              CERTAIN MEMBERS OF RESERVE COMPONENTS CALLED OR ORDERED 
              TO ACTIVE SERVICE.

    (a) Increase in Amount of Assistance.--Paragraph (4) of section 
16162(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) by striking ``one continuous year'' and 
                inserting ``nine continuous months''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``and'' after the semicolon at the 
                end;
            (2) in subparagraph (B)--
                    (A) by striking ``60 percent'' and inserting ``100 
                percent''; and
                    (B) by striking ``one continuous year'' and all 
                that follows through the end and inserting ``nine 
                continuous months or more or 18 noncontinuous months or 
                more during any 24-month period.''; and
            (3) by striking subparagraph (C).
    (b) Rate of Increased Educational Assistance.--Paragraph (2) of 
such section is amended by striking ``title 38 for a member'' and all 
that follows through the end and inserting the following: ``title 38 
for--
            ``(A) in the case of an allowance provided under paragraph 
        (4)(A), a member whose entitlement is based on completion of an 
        obligated period of active duty of three years; and
            ``(B) in the case of an allowance provided under paragraph 
        (4)(B), a member whose entitlement is based on completion of an 
        obligated period of active duty of two years.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) 
shall apply with respect to payments made after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5234]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1820-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]

Oklahoma; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Oklahoma (FEMA-1820-DR), dated February 15, 2009, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date:
    February 25, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Oklahoma is hereby amended to include Public 
Assistance in the following areas among those areas determined to have 
been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the 
President in his declaration of February 15, 2009.

    Carter County for Public Assistance, including direct Federal 
assistance, (already designated for Individual Assistance).
    Coal and Love Counties for Public Assistance, including direct 
Federal assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

Nancy Ward,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9-5234 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
```
#### E. V. GASKINS v. MRS. EVELYN DUNNING MITCHELL, Personally, and AS Administratrix of W. G. MITCHELL, Deceased, and EVELYN DUNNING MITCHELL, Infant.

(Filed 29 February, 1928.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Nunn, J.,*and a jury, at November Term, 1927, of Bertie.

No error.

*Gilliam & Spruill for plaintiff.*

*A. T. Gastello, Oraig & Pritchell for defendant.*

*852Per Curiam.

The issues submitted to the jury and their answers thereto were as follows:

> “1. Are the defendants indebted to the plaintiff, as alleged in the complaint, and if so, in what sum? Answer: No.

> “2. Did the plaintiff warrant the said water system to giye satisfaction and furnish a sufficient supply of water for the operation of a soda fountain, as alleged in the answer? Answer: Yes.

> “3. If so, did the said water system fail to furnish a sufficient supply of water for the operation of said soda fountain, as alleged ? Answer: Yes.

> “4. If so, what damages are the defendants entitled to recover of the plaintiff by reason thereof? Answer: Not any. Mr. E. Y. Gaskins shall have his water plant back;”

This action was here before. *Gaskins v. Mitchell,*194 N. C., 275. The proper issues were submitted to the jury in accordance with the former opinion of the action.

It was a question of fact for the jury. On the whole record, if error, it was harmless and not prejudicial.

No error.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Syniverse Holdings, Inc. and Syniverse Technologies, Inc. (the“Companies”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Tony G. Holcombe, Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies. 

Date: May 7, 2010

 

The abovecertification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
July 1, 1998

Robert H. Dick, President
R.H. Dick & Company, Inc.
14866 Draft Horse Lane
Wellington, Florida 33414

                           Re:     Consulting Agreement

Dear Bob:

        As we discussed, Valley Forge Scientific Corp. (the "Company") would
like you to perform investment banking and other business consulting services
on matters requested by the by the President or Board of Directors from time
to time. I understand that such services will be performed at your standard
hourly rates, plus out of pocket expenses.

       Please confirm your agreement to the foregoing terms, by signing the
copy of this letter in the space provided below and returning same to me.

                                  Sincerely,


                                  /s/ Jerry L. Malis
                                  Jerry L. Malis, President

Agreed to and Accepted By:
R.H. DICK & COMPANY, INC.


By:     /s/ Robert H. Dick
        Robert H. Dick, President
STATE of North Carolina v. Antwion Marquette WARREN

No. 457P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

W. Michael Spivey, Attorney at Law, Antwion Marquette Warren, for Warren, Antwion Marquette.

John W. Congleton, Assistant Attorney General, Kimberly S. Robb, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 27th of December 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-20-00035-CV

Carol OCHSE and William W. Ochse, III, individually and as trustee of the William W. Ochse 

III Family 2008 Trust,

Appellants

v.

Cynthia Cadwallader OCHSE,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-CI-00062

Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellants.

SIGNED November 18, 2020.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
EXHIBIT
      32.2




Written
      Statement of Principal Financial Officer Furnished Pursuant to


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


as
      Adopted by


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of HouseRaising, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. von
      Gnechten, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of
      my
      knowledge, that:




(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition as of March 31, 2007 and results of operations for
      the
      quarter ended March 31, 2007 of the Company and its subsidiaries.




/s/ Richard
              A. von GnechtenRichard
                A. von Gnechten
              Chief
                Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)




May
      15,
      2007





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. 09-9614.

#### Eric Bechler, Petitioner v. Al Scribner, Warden.

560 U.S. 910, 130 S. Ct. 3288,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1194,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4074.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1
IEA Income Fund IX
Rule 13a-14 Certifications
          I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:
          1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of IEA Income Fund IX(the “Registrant”);
          2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;
          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
          4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), theGeneral Partner of the Registrant, and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:
               (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; and
               (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
               (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
          5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of Registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
               (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
               (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: March 26, 2004 
/s/ DENNIS J TIETZ    Dennis J Tietz  President and Chief Executive Officer of CCC