alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Lorie M. Guerrera certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of CORDIACORPORATION;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
            necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with

respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
            material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
            this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
            defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have;

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
                 consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
                 annual report is being prepared;

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
                  filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c)  Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
                 our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
            audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
                  ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors, any material
                  weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
                  internal controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in
            internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
            evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 29, 2005

/s/ Lorie M. Guerrera

--------------------------------            Chief Accounting Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 21, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10621 Conference Calendar

MICHAEL J. FRISCHENMEYER, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:05-CV-91

-------------------- Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Michael J. Frischenmeyer, Texas prisoner # 698940, moves for a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. In that petition, Frischenmeyer challenged the Texas Parole Board’s refusal to grant him release on parole. Frischenmeyer was released on mandatory supervision on May 9, 2006. Frischenmeyer’s claims have been rendered moot by his release. See Bailey v. Southerland , 821 F.2d 277, 278-79 (5th Cir. 1987). Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal isNo. 05-10621 -2- DISMISSED AS MOOT. COA is DENIED AS MOOT.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Faik Mehmeti, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 574]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barbara Newman, J.), rendered March 21, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 1 year, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence, including the victim’s multiple stab wounds and the testimony of the *421emergency room doctor, clearly established the element of physical injury *(see, People v Rojas,*61 NY2d 726).

The court properly exercised its discretion in admitting limited evidence of prior assaults. This evidence was probative of defendant’s motive and intent and provided background events explaining the relationship among defendant, his former girlfriend and her new boyfriend, including defendant’s jealousy and anger *(see, People v Williams,*223 AD2d 491, *lv denied 87*NY2d 1026, *cert denied*519 US 952). The uncharged crimes evidence was also relevant to refute defendant’s justification defense under the circumstances of the case *(see, People v Blunt,*162 AD2d 315, *lv denied*76 NY2d 938). The probative value of this evidence outweighed its prejudicial effect, which was minimized by the court’s limiting instructions. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Andrias, Wallach, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

             FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


I, David Moskowitz,  President and Chief Executive Officer of GenoMed, Inc. (the
"registrant"), have executed this certification for furnishing to the Securities
and Exchange Commission in connection with the filing with the Commission of the
registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,
2004 (the "Report"). I hereby certify that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the registrant as of and for the end of that period.

                                          /s/ David Moskowitz
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          David Moskowitz
Date:  November 22, 2004                  President and Chief Executive Officer



                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

             FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


I, Robyn Owens,  Chief Financial  Officer of GenoMed,  Inc. (the  "registrant"),
have executed this  certification  for furnishing to the Securities and Exchange
Commission in connection with the filing with the Commission of the registrant's
Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended  September 30, 2004 (the
"Report"). I hereby certify that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the registrant as of and for the end of that period.


                                          /s/ Robyn Owens
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Robyn Owens
Date:  November 22, 2004                  Chief Financial Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. Salvador Maye MUTHE

No. COA18-1265

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 21, 2019

NO ERROR.
**Exhibit 12.1**

**CERTIFICATIONUnder 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

     In accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Intasys Corporation (the "Company") do hereby certify, to such officers' knowledge, that:          (1)     The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002 of the Company ("Form 20-F") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and          (2)     The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date:   June 18, 2003 | By:  /s/ David GoldmanDavid GoldmanChief Executive Officer                       |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:   June 18, 2003 | By:  /s/ Daniel BertrandDaniel BertrandVice President andChief Financial Officer |
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5345 

To require ratings labels on video games and to prohibit the sales and 

rentals of adult-rated video games to minors. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2006 

Mr. MATHESON (for himself and Mr. RENZI) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require ratings labels on video games and to prohibit 

the sales and rentals of adult-rated video games to minors. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Video Games Ratings 

5 Enforcement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RATING LABEL REQUIREMENT FOR VIDEO GAMES. 

7 (a) CONDUCT PROHIBITED.—It shall be unlawful for 

8 any person to ship or otherwise distribute in interstate 

9 commerce, or to sell or rent, a video game that does not 

10 contain a rating label, in a clear and conspicuous location 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5345 IH

1 on the outside packaging of the video game, containing 

2 an age-based content rating determined by the Entertain3 ment Software Ratings Board. 

4 (b) REQUIREMENT OF RETAILERS TO POST RATINGS

5 INFORMATION.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

6 of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Trade Commis7 sion shall promulgate rules requiring all retail establish8 ments engaged in the sale of video games to display, in 

9 a clear and conspicuous location, information about the 

10 content rating system of the Entertainment Software Rat11 ings Board. Such rules shall prescribe the information re12 quired to be displayed concerning the basic age-based con13 tent ratings of such Board. 

14 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON SALES AND RENTALS OF ADULT15 RATED VIDEO GAMES TO MINORS. 

16 It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or rent, 

17 or attempt to sell or rent— 

18 (1) any video game containing a content rating 

19 of ‘‘Adults Only’’ (as determined by the Entertain20 ment Software Ratings Board) to any person under 

21 the age of 18; or 

22 (2) any video game containing a content rating 

23 of ‘‘Mature’’ (as determined by such Board) to any 

24 person under the age of 17. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5345 IH

1 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT BY THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMIS2 SION. 

3 (a) UNFAIR OR DECEPTIVE ACT OR PRACTICE.—A 

4 violation of sections 2 or 3 shall be treated as a violation 

5 of a rule defining an unfair or deceptive act or practice 

6 prescribed under section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade 

7 Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)(1)(B)). The Federal 

8 Trade Commission shall enforce this Act in the same man9 ner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction 

10 as though all applicable terms and provisions of the Fed11 eral Trade Commission Act were incorporated into and 

12 made a part of this Act. 

13 (b) PENALTY.—Notwithstanding section 5(m) of the 

14 Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45(m)), any 

15 person who violates section 2 or 3 of this Act shall be 

16 subject to a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 per vio17 lation. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
---

Exhibit 8.1

List of subsidiaries of
Mamma.com Inc.

|Mamma.com USA, Inc.                                  |  |              | 
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------ | 
|Digital Arrow LLC                                    | 
|High Performance Broadcasting Inc.                   | 
|Intasys Billing Technologies Limited                 |  | (non-active) | 
|Intasys Billing Technologies (Canada) Inc.           |  | (non-active) | 
|Intasys Billing Technologies (Asia Pacific) Pty Ltd. |  | (non-active) | 
|Intasys Online limited                               |  | (non-active) | 
|Intasys Management Systems Inc.                      |  | (non-active) | 
|Intasys Management Systems                           |  | (non-active) | 

479
#### Savita Gupta, Appellant-Respondent, v Marilyn Boylan, Respondent-Appellant.

[718 NYS2d 841]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered March 27, 2000, which denied defendant’s motion to transfer the venue of this action to Westchester County, and granted plaintiffs cross motion to retain venue in Bronx County or, in the alternative, to change venue to New York County to the extent of changing the action’s venue to New York County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this transitory action to recover for injuries allegedly sustained when plaintiff, a New York County resident, was struck in Manhattan by an automobile operated by defendant, then a resident of Westchester County, the court properly exercised its discretion in granting to plaintiff the alternative relief of transferring venue from Bronx County to New York County, since venue had been laid by plaintiff in Bronx County based solely upon the circumstance that defendant’s driver’s license indicated that defendant was a Bronx resident, when in fact she no longer resided there. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Ellerin, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.
**Exhibit
      17.3**




**RESIGNATION**
 
 
 I,
        Chaslav Radovich, hereby tender and submit my resignation as a director of
        Cobalis Corp., a Nevada corporation (“Company”), such resignation to be
        effective on the 14th day of February 2007. My resignation was not the
        result of any disagreement with the policies or practices of the Company.
        I will
        continue to hold my positions as President and Secretary of the Company.
        In the
        event that Radul Radovich, currently a board member and chairman of the board
        of
        directors, leaves or is removed from those positions for any reason, I accept
        those positions upon the departure of Radul Radovich.


/s/ Chaslav
              RadovichChaslav
                Radovich
# C_2016345DE.01001202.xml

| 21.9.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 345/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 345/12

---

Berichtigung der Bekanntmachung der Einleitung eines Antisubventionsverfahrens betreffend die Einfuhren bestimmter warmgewalzter Flacherzeugnisse aus Eisen, nicht legiertem Stahl oder legiertem Stahl mit Ursprung in der Volksrepublik China

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 172 vom 13. Mai 2016
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 172 vom 13. Mai 2016

(2016/C 345/09)

Seite 29, Nummer 2:

Anstatt:

Anstatt:

„Bei der von der Untersuchung betroffenen Ware handelt es sich um warmgewalzte Flacherzeugnisse aus Eisen, nicht legiertem Stahl oder legiertem Stahl (ausgenommen rostfreier Stahl), auch in Rollen (Coils) (auch zugeschnittene Waren und Kaltband (‚narrow strip‘), nur warmgewalzt (warmgewalzte Flacherzeugnisse), weder plattiert noch überzogen, ausgenommen kornorientierter Siliciumelektrostahl (im Folgenden ‚zu untersuchende Ware‘).“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

„Bei der von der Untersuchung betroffenen Ware handelt es sich um warmgewalzte Flacherzeugnisse aus Eisen, nicht legiertem Stahl oder legiertem Stahl (ausgenommen rostfreier Stahl), auch in Rollen (Coils) (auch zugeschnittene Waren und Schmalband (‚narrow strip‘), nur warmgewalzt (warmgewalzte Flacherzeugnisse), weder plattiert noch überzogen, ausgenommen kornorientierter Siliciumelektrostahl (im Folgenden ‚zu untersuchende Ware‘).“

---
STATE v. David Alan KELLER

201A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 20, 2019

Emily H. Davis, Assistant Appellate Defender, For Keller, David Alan.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender.

M. Elizabeth Guzman, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Miller, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

*848The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 20th of August 2019 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2019."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 25th day of September 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

DAVID E. JONES , Appellant ,

v. ERIC M. WILLIE AND WILLIAM D. POWERS , Appellee s
. §
§
§
§
§
§
§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 111

- C V

Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1
of Travis County , Texas (TC# C

- 1

- CV

- 17

- 003737 )

O R D E R By opinion and judgment issued this same date in cause number 08

- 19

- 00196

- CV, t he Court granted Appellant’s motion to consolidate cause number 08

- 19

- 00196

- CV with cause number 08

- 19

- 00111

- CV and dismissed cause number 08

- 19

- 00196

- CV. The notice of appeal filed in cause number 08

- 19

- 00196

- CV has been filed as an amended notice of app eal in this cause number. Further, Appellant’s motion filed on July 31, 2019 in cause number 08

- 19

- 00196

- CV has been filed in this cause number. The clerk’s record filed in the instant appeal does not include the notice of appeal filed by Appellant with the trial court clerk on May 30, 2019. Therefore, a supplemental clerk’s record containing that notice of appeal is due to be filed in this Court on or before August 12, 2019. In the event it is necessary to supplement the clerk’s record with any other i tems, Appellant is directed to immediately take steps to ensure they are included in the supplemental clerk’s record. Appellant’s brief is due to be filed on August 9, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 st day of August , 20 1 9

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**[LETTERHEAD OF KIRKLAND, RUSS, MURPHY & TAPP]**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT**

 

Board of Directors and Stockholders 

BBJ Environmental Technologies, Inc. 

  and Subsidiaries: 

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of BBJ Environmental Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, andcash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standardsgenerally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on atest basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financialstatement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of BBJ Environmental Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003and 2002, and the results of their operations and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. 

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a goingconcern. As discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s significant operating losses and accumulated deficit raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans inregard to these matters are also discussed in Note 7. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. 

 

Kirkland, Russ, Murphy & Tapp P.A. 

 

February 19, 2004
ex1020rcrc201010k.htm


Exhibit 10.20






RC2 Corporation


1111 W. 22nd Street


Suite 320


Oak Brook, IL  60523


Phone (630) 573-7200


Fax (630) 573-7575












December 28, 2010


 








	
Curtis W. Stoelting


2510 Hanford Lane


Aurora, IL 60502

	  






	
Dear Curt:

	
Re:

	
Amendment to Employment Agreement







 


The purpose of this letter is to make a technical amendment to the Employment Agreement between you and RC2 dated April 1, 2008 (your "Employment Agreement").  The following is hereby added to the end of section 6(d) of your Employment Agreement:


 


Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, any Change of Control Severance Payment in excess of the Severance Exception Limit shall be paid on the same schedule as Salary Continuation Severance Payments (in proportionate installments for amounts calculated with reference to Base Salary) and the Bonus Severance Payment (in proportionate installments for amounts calculated with reference to the Bonus Plan) unless the applicable Termination Date occurs within the two-year period following a "change in control event" (within the meaning of Treasury Regulation section 1.409A-3(i)(5)).


 


Undefined terms in this letter have the meaning provided in your Employment Agreement.  Please confirm your acceptance of this letter and the amendment to your Employment Agreement by signing and returning a copy of this letter to me.


 


Yours very truly,







RC2 CORPORATION







BY /s/  Linda A. Huett                                                                                  


Linda A. Huett


Compensation Committee Chairperson







Accepted and agreed to this


30th day of December, 2010







/s/  Curtis W. Stoelting                                                                                           


Curtis W. Stoelting