alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.27
 19 May 2009
    
    (VODAFONE LOGO)
 
  INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS
   (i)
    
    The Company will provide funds to cover costs as incurred by you in defending legal
proceedings brought against you in your capacity as, or as a result of your being or having
been, a Director of the Company including criminal proceedings and proceedings brought by the
Company itself or an Associated Company;(ii)
    
    The Company will indemnify you in respect of any proceedings brought by third parties,
including both legal and financial costs of an adverse judgment brought against you in your
capacity as, or as a result of your being or having been, a Director of the Company; and(iii)
    
    The Company will indemnify you for liability incurred in connection with any application
made to a court for relief from liability, where the court grants such relief.
  (i)
    
    Unsuccessful defence of criminal proceedings, in which instance the Company would seek
reimbursement for any funds advanced;(ii)
    
    Unsuccessful defence of an action brought by the Company itself or an Associated Company, in
which instance the Company would seek reimbursement for any funds advanced;
 Vodafone Group Plc




---



##### 



(iii)
    
    Fines imposed by regulatory bodies;(iv)
    
    Fines imposed in criminal proceedings; and(v)
    
    Liability incurred in connection with any application under Section 661(3) or (4) of the
Companies Act 2006 (acquisition of shares by innocent nominee) or section 1157 of the
Companies Act 2006 (general power to grant relief in case of honest and reasonable conduct),
where the court refuses to grant you relief, and such refusal is final. (For reference, a
summary of these sections is appended to this letter).
      
  /s/ Steve PuseySteve PuseyChief Technology OfficerVodafone Group PlcDate:




---



##### 



Appendix
 Section 661(3) and (4) Companies Act 2006
  Section 1157 Companies Act 2006
EXHIBIT
      32.1




Written
      Statement of Principal Executive Officer Furnished Pursuant to


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


as
      Adopted by


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of HouseRaising, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory J.
      Wessling, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition as of September 30, 2007 and results of operations
      for
      the quarter ended September 30, 2007 of the Company and its
      subsidiaries.






/s/
                Gregory J. WesslingGregory
                J. WesslingChairman
                of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
                Officer)





November
      14, 2007





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                              PACIFIC STATE BANCORP

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific State Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
knowledge, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company


                                           Date: May 15, 2007

                                           /s/ Steven A. Rosso
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Steven A. Rosso
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

                                       29
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Franklin Mendez, Appellant.

[720 NYS2d 65]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie Wittner, J.), rendered November 6, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of rape in the first degree (four counts), sodomy in the first degree (three counts), robbery in the first degree (two counts), attempted rape in the first degree, and sexual abuse in the first degree (three counts), and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 62 to 186 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s motion to suppress identification testimony was properly denied. As to the police canvass, the evidence establishes that defendant was simultaneously identified by two victims who did not influence each another. As to the lineup, the record establishes that the lineup fillers were sufficiently similar in appearance to the defendant and that there was not a substantial likelihood that the defendant would be singled out for identification (see, *People v Chipp,*75 NY2d 327, 336, *cert denied*498 US 833).

The court properly exercised its discretion in refusing to deliver an adverse inference charge regarding the prosecution’s inadvertent failure to store condoms recovered from the crime scene in a manner that would have allegedly permitted more effective DNA testing. Since defendant never requested an analysis of the condoms and never expressed any interest in them until the alleged “degradation” of DNA evidence was revealed during trial, he forfeited any right that he may have had to demand an analysis or to claim that he was prejudiced by the storage methods *(People v Allgood,*70 NY2d 812; *People v Aponte,*240 AD2d 317, *lv denied*91 NY2d 868). In any event, there is no indication that better DNA testing would have produced any exculpatory evidence.

The court’s *Sandoval*ruling was a proper exercise of discretion that appropriately balanced the probative value of defendant’s prior bad acts against the potential for prejudice. The court properly permitted limited inquiry into the underlying facts of defendant’s two dismissed cases and two prison incidents that occurred during the pendency of this case, since *435these prior bad acts were relevant to credibility and a suitable good faith basis was established by the People *(see, People v Alamo,*23 NY2d 630; *People v Sorge,*301 NY 198).

The emergency 911 call to the police was properly admitted as an excited utterance, since it was clearly made under the influence of the stress caused by the crime *(see, People v Edwards,*47 NY2d 493, 497). Given the heinous crimes committed by defendant and his associates during the five-hour ordeal, the fact that the victim told the operator that he was held at gunpoint, when in fact he was only threatened with being shot, was properly determined to be an inadvertence and not a calculated attempt to get a more rapid police response.

Defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur— Williams, J. P., Mazzarelli, Lerner, Rubin and Buckley, JJ.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED BY SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           I, Steven Dinetz, as Chief Executive Officer of NextMedia Operating, Inc. (the**“Company”**) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

           (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the **“Report”**) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 14, 2002

|   | /s/ Steven Dinetz                                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Steven Dinetz Chief Executive Officer of the Company |
EXHIBIT 32.1



                           CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Norton Industries Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Jianjun Zhang, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: November 8, 2004

/s/ Jianjun Zhang
---------------------------------------------
Jianjun Zhang, President
(principal executive officer and principal
 accounting officer)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Steven Dinetz, as Chief Executive Officer of NextMedia Operating, Inc.(the “**Company**”) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the“**Report**”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: August 15, 2005 

 

 

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THISWRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO NEXTMEDIA OPERATING, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY NEXTMEDIA OPERATING, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS





CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









I, Harry Chew__________________, Co-Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of Bi-Optic Ventures, Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period

ended November 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange

Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of

Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and results of operations

of the Company.







Date:  January 14, 2008



/s/  Harry Chew

Harry Chew, Co-Chairman and Chief Financial Officer











1
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T W H I TN EY C. PH I LLI PS, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. M A G G I E M I L L E R ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 35139 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 0 2 9 8 - EFS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe E a s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on E dw a r d F . S he a , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a y25, 2010 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. W h i tn ey C . P h i l l i p s, a fo rm er W ash i n g t o n st at e p ri so n er, ap p eal s p ro se f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng w i th pr e j udi c e hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983



# FI LED JU N 21 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 35139 2 a c t i on a l l e gi ng tha tpr i s on of f i c i a l s unl a w f

ul l yde t a i ne d hi m a l m os tthr e e w e e ks p a s t h is e a r lyr e le a s e d a te . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o ad is m is s a l u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 9 1 5 A , R es ni ck v. H ayes , 213 F . 3d 4 4 3 , 4 4 7 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 0 ) , a n dw e a f f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l yc onc l ude d tha tP hi l l i ps ’ s a c t i on i s ba rr e d bythe ap p lic ab le th r e e - y e a rlim ita tio n s p e r io d . See W a s h . R e v . C o d e § 4 .1 6 .0 8 0 ( 2 ) ; se e a l so B a g ley v. C

M CR ea l Esta te C o rp . , 92 3 F . 2d 75 8, 76 0 (9th C i r. 19 91 ). W e d e n yP h illip s ’s r e q u e s t f o rap p o in tm e n t o f

c o u n s e l b e c au s e h e f

a ils to e s tab lis h e x c e p tio n a l c ir c u m s tan c e s f o rs u c h ap p o in tm e n t. See W i lbo rn v. Es c alde r on , 78 9 F . 2d 13 28 , 13 31 (9th C i r. 19 86 ). W e d o n o t c o n s id e ris s u e s r a is e df o rth e f ir s t tim e o n ap p e a l. Se e Fo ti v . C ity o f Men lo P a rk , 14 6 F . 3d 62 9, 23 8 (9th C i r. 19 98 ). AF F I RME D.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 May 9, 2008
    /s/ DAVID W. WILLIAMSDavid W. WilliamsChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
of Noble Corporation
exv10w111






Exhibit 10.111




Select Medical Corporation

4714 Gettysburg Road

Mechanicsburg, PA 17055




March 8, 2011



Mr. Martin F. Jackson

Select Medical Corporation

4714 Gettysburg Road

Mechanicsburg, PA 17055



RE: Fourth Amendment to the Agreement in the Event of a Change of Control of SMC



Dear Mr. Jackson:




     The following confirms our desire to amend the letter agreement, dated as of March 1, 2000
between you and Select Medical Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), as amended on
February 23, 2001, February 24, 2005 and December 18, 2008 (the “Letter Agreement”).



     In consideration of your past and continued service to the Company and the mutual covenants
and agreements contained in this fourth amendment to the Letter Agreement (the “Amendment”), the
Company and you hereby agree, intending to be legally bound, as follows:


1. Section 3(a)(iii) of the Letter Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to
read as follows and all references to Section 3(a)(iii) in the Letter Agreement are hereby deleted:





“(iii) Intentionally Omitted.”


2. Section 5(d) of the Letter Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as
follows:





“(d) As a condition to payment of any amount required under Section 1 hereof, you
shall deliver to the Company a general release of liability of the Company and its
officers and directors in a form reasonably satisfactory to the Company, such that
such release is effective, with all revocation periods having expired unexercised,
by no later than the (i) 60th day after such termination, in the event
of a Post-Change of Control Termination and (ii) first business day of the seventh
month following such termination, in the event of a Pre-Change of Control
Termination.”


3. Section 5(g) of the Letter Agreement is hereby amended to add the following to the end thereof:





“This Agreement is intended to comply with Code Section 409A (to the extent
applicable) and the parties hereto agree to interpret, apply and administer this
Agreement in the least restrictive manner necessary to comply therewith and
without resulting in any increase in the amounts owed hereunder by the Company.”



 








 



4. Except as amended hereby, the Letter Agreement shall continue in effect in accordance with its
terms.




     Please indicate your acceptance of the above Amendment by signing below in the space
indicated.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	 	 	Very Truly Yours,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	SELECT MEDICAL CORPORATION, a

 Delaware Corporation	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Michael E. Tarvin
 

Name: Michael E. Tarvin
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Title: Executive Vice President	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Martin F. Jackson	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Martin F. Jackson
**Exhibit 4.7**

 

 

10 January 2017

 

Royal Bank of Scotland

IB Service and Operations

250 Bishopsgate

London

EC2M 4AA

 

**For the attention of Gilda Cara, Syndicated Loans Agency**

 

Dear Sirs

 

**Vodafone Group Plc – $4.09bn 5+1+1 Revolving Credit Facility dated on 27 February 2015, the (“RCF”)**

 

Included within the RCF referenced above is an Extension Option (Section 6) whereby Vodafone may give notice to the Facility Agent not more than 60 days and not less than 30 days before the second anniversary that it wishes to request that the Final Maturity Date be extended for a further period of one year i.e. extend the current Maturity Date of Friday 26 February 2021 to Friday 25 February 2022.

 

Please accept this letter as confirmation that Vodafone wishes to apply for such a one year extension in accordance with Section 6 of the RCF. In your role as Facility Agent please could you communicate this request to all Lenders and collate the Lender responses by Thursday 9 February 2017.

 

If you have any questions or require any clarification please do not hesitate to contact Neil Garrod, Vodafone Group Treasury Director.

 
| Yours faithfully                |   |                      |
|---------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                            |   |                      |
|                            |   |                      |
|                                 |   |                           |
| N Read                          |   | N A Garrod                |
| Group Chief   Financial Officer |   | Group Treasury   Director |

 

**Vodafone Group Services Limited** Group Treasury

One Kingdom Street, Paddington Central,

London, W2 6BY, United Kingdom

 

**vodafone.com**

 

Registered office:Vodafone House, The Connection, Newbury Berkshire, RG14 2FN, Registered in England No. 3802001

 

1

----
STATE v. NORFOLK JUNIOR BEST

300A93-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2019

Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, Jon David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Michael Unti, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Jay H. Ferguson, Attorney at Law, Durham, Erica W. Washington, Attorney at Law, for Best, Norfolk Junior.

*209***Amended***

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 26th of June 2019 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of June 2019."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 9th day of September, 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
Order issued September ~ , 2012

In The

Court of Appeala

No. 05-12-00921-CV

AMERIPLAN CORPORATION, DANIEL BLOOM, AND DENNIS BLOOM, Appellants

V.

DAVID PIAZZA AND STEPHANIE PIAZZA, Appellees

ORDER

The Court has before it appellants’ September 14, 2012 second unopposed motion for

extension of time to file appellants’ brief. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS

appellants to file their brief by October 1, 2012. No further extensions will be granted absent a

showing of exceptional circumstances.

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 FOR THE ANNUAL PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         207,696
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 207,696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (146,756)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   207,696
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,781
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,781)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,781)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,781)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>REGISTRANT HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET.
</FN>


</TABLE>