alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 77582]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31981]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7726]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Cindy Sherman''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Cindy Sherman,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of Modern Art, New 
York, New York, from on or about February 26, 2012, until on or about 
June 11, 2012, the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, San Francisco, 
California, from on or about July 14, 2012, until on or about October 
7, 2012, the Walker Art Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, from on or 
about November 3, 2012, until on or about February 10, 2013, and the 
Dallas Museum of Art, Dallas, Texas, from on or about March 17, 2013, 
until on or about June 9, 2013, and at possible additional exhibitions 
or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: (202) 
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: December 6, 2011.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-31981 Filed 12-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
#### State of West Virginia *v.*H. B. Campbell

(No. 7283)

Submitted May 19. 1932.

Decided May 24, 1932.

*A. M. Belcher,*for plaintiff in error.

*H. B. Lee,*Attorney General and *B. A. Blessing,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Woods, Judge:

Defendant prosecutes error from a judgment sentencing him to two and one-half years in the penitentiary for uttering a forged check.

The cheek in question, which is for $37.50, is drawn on the Farmers. & Citizens State Bank of Clendenin in favor of Orville Gibson, and is purported to be signed by S. J. Gibson, as maker. Across the face thereof appears the typewritten statement, “signature guaranteed”, with the signature of the defendant signed thereunder. On the back, appears the name of the payee, the name of the prosecuting witness, and that of the defendant, in the order named. From the evidence", it appears that the defendant, who operates a store in Clen-denin, can neither read nor write, except to scrawl his own name; that he had a substantial account in the Farmers & Citizens State Bank; that, at the time of presentment, the teller showed the check to the cashier; that the statement “signature guaranteed” was typed across the face of the check by one of said employees; that the cashier, after asking *356from whom the cheek was obtained requested defendant to, and the latter did, -sign his name; that the check was cashed without further comment; that in about two weeks the check was dishonored by the purported maker and the same then charged against defendant’s account; that defendant thereupon had the prosecuting witness, who had requested him to have the check cashed, arrested. Nothing appears in the record to show that defendant profited, or could have profited, in any particular from the alleged uttering, had the check been honored , by the maker. So far as the record discloses, the prosecuting witness alone benefited by the transaction.

Knowledge that the instrument was forged at the time of uttering it, is a necessary element of the crime. Did the defendant have any such knowledge at the time he presented it to the bank and received the money thereon, which he accounted for to the prosecuting witness? The evidence of the prosecuting witness and an alleged bystander as to the planning of the defendant and the prosecuting witness to obtain the $37.50 is so unreasonable, so weak, and so completely overborne by the witnesses for the defendant that the court, when considering the entire record, is of opinion that the verdict of the jury is not warranted. *State*v. *McHenry,*93 W. Va. 396, 117 S. E. 143.

As the case must be remanded for a new trial, further comment on the evidence is deemed unnecessary.

*Reversed; verdict set aside; new trial awarded.*
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Jeff Kinsella, Chief Financial Officer of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer), certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:  June 5, 2006

 

/s/ Jeff Kinsella                                                

Jeff Kinsella

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4128

_____________________________

MARK W. BAXLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jennie Kinsey, Judge.

March 11, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

LEWIS, ROWE, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Mark W. Baxley, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
In the ESTATE OF Alan Ray WAELDER, Deceased.

No. ED 105770

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, NORTHERN DIVISION.

Filed: June 12, 2018

James F. Lemon, 119 South 10th Street, Hannibal, MO 63401, for appellant.

Amy L. Ohnemus, 2801 St. Mary's Ave., P.O. Box 962, Hannibal, MO 63401, for respondent.

Before James M. Dowd, C.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM

Clayton Waelder, the only child of decedent Alan Waelder, appeals the judgment entered by the probate division of the Circuit Court of Ralls County in favor of Carolyn Waelder, Alan's wife and Clayton's stepmother, on Carolyn's motion to amend the certificate of clerk in a small estate. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The trial court's judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(1).
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amincor, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the  period  ended  March 31,  2011 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on May 23, 2011 (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,  in the
capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.


Date: May 23, 2011                      /s/Robert L. Olson
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert L. Olson, Chief Financial Officer
Ex. 32





CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Vivian Lam, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Oxford Technologies, Inc. on the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Oxford Technologies, Inc.







|                         |  |     |  |                                                              
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  |     |  |                                                              
|Date:  November 12, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Vivian Lam                                               
|                         |  |     |  | Vivian Lam, President                                        
|                         |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oxford Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacinta Sit, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







|                                                              | 
|------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Jacinta Sit                                               | 
|Jacinta Sit, President                                        | 
|(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) | 



February 25, 2008





1
Exhibit
32.1








PACIFIC
STATE BANCORP





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific State Bancorp (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), the undersigned hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements and Exchange Act of 1934;
      and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company











Date: May
15, 2009


/S/ Rick D.
Simas


Rick D.
Simas


President
and Chief Executive Officer
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Rontese MILLER, Appellant.

No. ED 104809

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

FILED: March 6, 2018

FOR APPELLANT: Ellen H. Flottman, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203.

For Respondent: JOSHUA D. HAWLEY, Shaun Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Rontese Miller ("Appellant") appeals from the trial court's judgment following a jury trial convicting him of second-degree robbery, in violation of Section 569.030 (RSMo. 2000 ). Appellant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to 30 years' imprisonment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5540 Reported in Senate (RS)]







                                                       Calendar No. 575
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5540


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 20, 2006

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             August 1, 2006

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 217 Southeast 2nd Street in Dimmitt, Texas, as the ``Sergeant Jacob 
                        Dan Dones Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT JACOB DAN DONES POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 217 Southeast 2nd Street in Dimmitt, Texas, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Sergeant Jacob Dan Dones Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Jacob Dan Dones Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 575

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5540

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 217 Southeast 2nd Street in Dimmitt, Texas, as the ``Sergeant Jacob 
                        Dan Dones Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             August 1, 2006

                       Reported without amendment`
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-KSB
FOR THE PERIOD APRIL 1, 1999 TO MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         580,035
<SECURITIES>                                   165,114
<RECEIVABLES>                                  611,869
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  6,941,474
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,298,492
<PP&E>                                       1,704,674
<DEPRECIATION>                                  53,962
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,206,910
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,682,372
<BONDS>                                      2,907,409
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       894,600
<OTHER-SE>                                     772,529
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,206,910
<SALES>                                      8,757,517
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,773,414
<CGS>                                        7,218,735
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,218,735
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,677,488
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             126,657
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (249,466)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (249,466)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (249,466)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.028)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.028)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 48 (Friday, March 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10966-10967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5272]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--ASTM International

    Notice is hereby given that, on February 17, 2009, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), ASTM International 
(``ASTM'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions 
or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust

[[Page 10967]]

plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, ASTM has provided an updated list of current, ongoing 
ASTM standards activities originating between December 2008 and 
February 2009 designated as Work Items. A complete listing of ASTM Work 
Items, along with a brief description of each, is available at http://www.astm.org.
    On September 15, 2004, ASTM filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on November 10, 2004 (69 FR 65226).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on December 9, 
2008. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on February 3, 2009 (74 FR 5948).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. E9-5272 Filed 3-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      103,942
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      9,942
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          16,016
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         3,778
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 133,678
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       21,537
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             21,581
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  43,118
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              456
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            43,266
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               5,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      242
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  41,596
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  133,678
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       58,302
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             2,778
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      46,471
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      49,249
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          9,053
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 217
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   9,270
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         4,117
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,153
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         23
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    5,130
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         3,734
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        3,878
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          11,475
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.73
        

</TABLE>