alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5503 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2006 

Received 

NOVEMBER 13, 2006 

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban 

Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend the National Housing Act to increase the mortgage amount limits applicable to FHA mortgage insurance for multifamily housing located in high-cost areas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


hmoore on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

HR 5503 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FHA Multifamily Loan 

3 Limit Adjustment Act of 2006’’. 

4 SEC. 2. MULTIFAMILY HOUSING MORTGAGE LIMITS IN 

5 HIGH COST AREAS. 

6 The National Housing Act is amended— 

7 (1) in sections 207(c)(3), 213(b)(2)(B)(i), 

8 221(d)(3)(ii)(II), 221(d)(4)(ii)(II), 231(c)(2)(B), 

9 and 234(e)(3)(B) (12 U.S.C. 1713(c)(3), 

10 1715e(b)(2)(B)(i), 1715l(d)(3)(ii)(II), 

11 1715l(d)(4)(ii)(II), 1715v(c)(2)(B), and 

12 1715y(e)(3)(B))— 

13 (A) by striking ‘‘140 percent’’ each place 

14 such term appears and inserting ‘‘170 percent’’; 

15 and 

16 (B) by striking ‘‘170 percent in high cost 

17 areas’’ each time place such term appears and 

18 inserting ‘‘215 percent in high cost areas’’; and 

19 (2) in section 220(d)(3)(B)(iii)(III) (12 U.S.C. 

20 1715k(d)(3)(B)(iii)(III)) by striking ‘‘206A’’ and all 

21 that follows through ‘‘project-by-project basis’’ and 

22 inserting the following: ‘‘206A of this Act) by not to 

23 exceed 170 percent in any geographical area where 

24 the Secretary finds that cost levels so require and by 

25 not to exceed 170 percent, or 215 percent in high 


hmoore on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
3 

HR 5503 RFS

1 cost areas, where the Secretary determines it nec2 essary on a project-by-project basis’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 27, 

2006. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


hmoore on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
exv10w58









Exhibit 10.58




FIRST AMENDMENT TO FORM OF EXECUTIVE LONG-TERM INCENTIVE 

PERFORMANCE UNIT AGREEMENT

(EPS Based; One Year Performance Period; 14-Month Restricted Period)





     WHEREAS, the Performance Units granted under the Form of Executive Long-Term Incentive
Performance Unit Agreement (EPS Based; One Year Performance Period; 14-Month Restricted Period)
(the “Agreement”) granted under the Global Industries, Ltd 2005 Stock Incentive Plan for 2009 are
not vested; and



     WHEREAS, Section 9 of the Agreement provides that the Committee in its sole discretion may
unilaterally modify this Agreement as it deems necessary or appropriate to comply with Section 409A
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and any regulations or guidance issued thereunder
(the “Code”); and



     WHEREAS, the Committee and Global Industries, Ltd. desire to amend the Agreement;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended to add the following:



     1. Section 2(d) shall be amended to add the following at the end thereof: ,“and such shares
shall be issued as unrestricted shares.



     2. The first paragraph of Section 4 shall be amended to add: “or Paragraph 2(d)” after the
reference to Paragraph 2(c) therein.



     3. New Section 13.



     To the extent that Code Section 409A applies to any Performance Units granted under this
Agreement, this Agreement shall be construed and interpreted to comply with Code Section 409A.
With respect to any shares of Stock to be issued on account of a termination of employment of a
Participant who is a “Specified Employee” within the meaning of Code Section 409A at the time of
such termination of employment, such shares shall not be issued until the first business day which
is six (6) months after the Participant’s termination of employment. For the purposes of Code
Section 409A, a termination of employment under this Agreement shall mean a “separation of service”
within the meaning of Code Section 409A. In addition, an event under this Agreement will not
constitute a Change in Control during the Performance Period unless it is also a “change in the
ownership or effective control of” the Company, or a “change in the ownership of a substantial
portion of the assets” of the Company (in each case as determined under Section 409A(a)(2)(A)(v) of
the Code and final Treasury Regulations or other IRS guidance issued under Code Section 409A from
time to time).



 









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Committee has authorized and the Company has executed this Agreement
by its duly authorized officer.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	GLOBAL INDUSTRIES, LTD.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ David R. Sheil
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	David R. Sheil 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Senior Vice President, Human Resources 	 
	 
	 	Date: December 22, 2009

 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 



2
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 21, 2012

h0514 

# Order

May 21, 2012

144412

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144412 COA: 306262 Wayne CC: 10-006085-FC MICHAEL KRISTOPHER KELLY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 2, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
Evrick BROWN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 105545

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

FILED: April 10, 2018

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Gwenda Renee Robinson, Missouri Public Defender Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Richard Anthony Starnes, Assistant Attorney General, Supreme Court Building, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Evrick Brown ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order"1 denying Movant's "Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence," which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An *688extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

"An order sustaining or overruling a motion filed under ... Rule 29.15 shall be deemed a final judgment for purposes of appeal by the movant or the state." Rule 29.15(k).
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Syniverse Holdings, Inc. and Syniverse Technologies, Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report), I, Tony G. Holcombe, Chief
Executive Officer of the Companies, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Companies.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 9, 2007 |  | /s/ Tony G. Holcombe   
|                     |  | Tony G. Holcombe       
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Mary Jane Robertson, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer ofCrum & Forster Holdings Corp., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date:  July 29, 2005 By:  /s/   *Mary Jane Robertson*    Mary Jane Robertson   Executive Vice President,
James W. LEWIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

ED 105167

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: March 6, 2018

Annette M. Wallace, 920 Main Street, Suite 500, Kansas City, MO 64105, For Movant/Appellant.

Evan J. Buchheim, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

James W. Lewis appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order of the motion court denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); *Burston v. State*, 343 S.W.3d 691, 693 (Mo. App. E.D. 2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the *889decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2016, unless otherwise indicated.
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. § 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63
      of
      Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of The
      Tube Media Corp. (the "Company") does hereby certify with respect to the
      Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September
      30, 2005 (the "Report") that:







1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




September
              1,
              2006
            
            
            /s/
              D. Patrick
              LaPlatney**Name:**D.
              Patrick LaPlatney**Title:**Chief Executive Officer





September
              1,
              2006
            
            
            /s/
Celestine
              F. Spoden**Name:**Celestine
              F. Spoden**Title:**Chief Financial Officer





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
      States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
      disclosure document.
AFS-16-45322 November 28, 2016

Exemption No. 11105A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0715

Mr. Jim D. Bilbrey Adventure Flights, Inc.

19301 Jasmine Court Lake Elsinore, CA 92530

Dear Mr. Bilbrey:

This letter is to inform you we have granted your request for an extension to exemption 11105. This letter also explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated October 1, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Adventure Flights, Inc. (Adve nture Flights), Air Agency certificate number QJBS584K, for an extension to Exemption No. 11105. That exemption from § 141.5(d) and (e) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations ( 14 CFR) allows Adventure Flights to renew its pilot school certificate, with ratings for li ghter-than-air balloon courses, without having graduated 10 different people from these course s or having established the required pass rate.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Adventure Flights.2

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U. S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113, and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Adventure Flights an exemption from 14 CFR § 141.5(d) and (e) to allow Adventure Fli ghts to renew its pilot school certificate, with ratings for lighter-than-air balloon cour ses, without having graduated 10 different people from these courses or having established the required pass rate.

The Effect of Our Decision

This exemption terminates on November 30, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ John Barbagallo Deputy Director Flight Standards Service
Order filed February 6, 2018 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00880-CV

____________

TRANSAMERICA CORPORATION, Appellant

V.

BRAES WOODS CONDO ASSOCIATION INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2016-12580

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due January 19, 2018. No brief or motion for extension 

of time has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before February 21, 2018, 

the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21

- 045 6 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. NEIL LYNN NUNES,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Kelsey McAlpine is granted an extension of time to and including July 5, 202 2 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 11 2022

05/11/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0456
Exhibit 32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dahua Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A2 for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hua Meng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









|                                  | 
|--------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Hua Meng                      | 
|Hua Meng, Chief Financial Officer | 





March 30, 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. 23-0641

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

THOMAS JERRY HILL,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 29, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 23 2024

04/23/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0641
EXHIBIT
      31.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Nancy
      Huber, Chief Financial Officer of Bullion River Gold Corp. (the "small business
      issuer"), certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement
      of
      a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were
      made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly
      Report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects
      the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;





4.
      I am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and
      I
      have:





a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;





b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c)
      presented in this Quarterly Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the
      disclosure controls and procedures based on My evaluation as of the Evaluation
      Date;





5.
      I have
      disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors
      and
      the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
      the equivalent function);





a)
      all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
      could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
      and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's auditors
      any
      material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls.





Dated:
                November 14, 2006
            
            Signature:
            /s/
                Nancy Huber
              Nancy
                HuberChief Financial
                Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. Jonathan Travis BEST

No. COA18-563

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 16, 2019

NO ERROR.
exhibit10c.htm


 


 


EXHIBIT 10.50





TERMS OF DEFERRED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT WITH CERTAIN EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


 









The form of Deferred Stock Unit Award Agreement (the “Agreement”), filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on From 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, contains blanks where the executive’s name, target number of shares, grant date, vesting date, performance period, shortened performance period start date, and months in term provided under the Agreement vary for each executive.







On January 18, 2011, performance share awards were granted providing certain executives the opportunity to earn common stock, the number of which is determined pursuant to, and subject to the attainment of, performance goals.  The performance share awards were granted with a term of 36 months and vest on January 18, 2014.  The awards shortened performance period start date was January 1, 2011 thereby making the performance period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013.  The target number of shares for each executive awarded performance shares on January 18, 2011 is listed below.













	
Executive Officer

	
Target number of shares


	
 


Joseph J. MarcAurele

	
11,829


	
 


David V. Devault

	
4,690


	
 


Stephen M. Bessette

	
3,460


	
 


James M. Vesey

	
3,774


	
 


Galan G. Daukas

	
6,152


	
 


Mark K.W. Gim

	
3,423


	
 


Barbara J. Perino

	
3,423