alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         325,698
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  752,297
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,298,568
<PP&E>                                       5,039,277
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,123,653
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,860,723
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,599,639
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       241,995
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  3,518,694
<OTHER-SE>                                  (4,949,680)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,860,723
<SALES>                                      5,619,968
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,619,968
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,365,664
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,901,921
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             363,724
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,011,547
<INCOME-TAX>                                   361,072
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            650,475
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   650,475
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.2**I, Bruce W. Busmire, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Noble Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: November 9, 2005   /s/ BRUCE W. BUSMIRE   Bruce W. Busmire
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 520 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 520

To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the effective date for 
 payment of lump sums to persons awarded the Medal of Honor who are in 
receipt of special pension pursuant to section 1562 of such title, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2005

    Mr. Green of Wisconsin introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the effective date for 
 payment of lump sums to persons awarded the Medal of Honor who are in 
receipt of special pension pursuant to section 1562 of such title, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EFFECTIVE DATE FOR PAYMENT OF LUMP SUMS TO PERSONS AWARDED 
              THE MEDAL OF HONOR.

    Section 1562(f) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1) by inserting ``on or after April 27, 
        1916,'' after ``under this section'';
            (2) in paragraph (2) by inserting ``or (4)'' after 
        ``paragraph (1)''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
    ``(3) If a person otherwise eligible for payment under paragraph 
(1) is deceased, the Secretary shall make the payment to the living 
person first listed below:
            ``(A) The decedent's spouse.
            ``(B) The decedent's children (in equal shares).
            ``(C) The decedent's dependent parents (in equal shares).
    ``(4) If a person is awarded the Medal of Honor posthumously on or 
after April 27, 1916, the Secretary shall pay, in a lump sum, an amount 
equal to the total amount of special pension that the person would have 
received during the period beginning on the first day of the first 
month beginning after the date of the act for which the person was 
awarded the Medal of Honor and ending on the last day of the month 
preceding the month in which the person died to the living person first 
listed below:
            ``(A) The decedent's spouse.
            ``(B) The decedent's children (in equal shares).
            ``(C) The decedent's dependent parents (in equal 
        shares).''.
                                 <all>
```
* Theappelleewasnotservedwithprocess inthedistrictcourtandisnotparticipatinginthisappeal.Afterexaminingthebriefsandtherecord,wehaveconcludedthatoralargumentisunnecessary.Thus,theappealissubmittedonthebriefsandtherecord.SeeF ED . R. A PP . P.34(a)(2).

** Richardshasalreadychallengedthisbankruptcypetitionseveraltimes.SeeRichardsv.Stevens ,310F.App’x898(7thCir.2009);Richardsv.HSBCTech.&Servs.USA, Inc. ,303F.App’x356(7thCir.2008);Richardsv.Stevens ,299F.App’x579(7thCir.2008). 

# United States Court of AppealsFortheSeventhCircuitChicago,Illinois60604SubmittedJune24,2009 *

DecidedJune24,2009BytheCourt:No.084193TERENCEBRUCERICHARDS,PlaintiffAppellant,

v.JAMESE.STEVENS , DefendantAppellee

. AppealfromtheUnitedStatesDistrictCourtfortheNorthernDistrictofIllinois,EasternDivision.No.07C1907MatthewF.Kennelly, Judge

.ORDERInthelatestchallengetohisbankruptcycase, ** TerenceRichardssuedthetrustee,JamesStevens,forhisroleinhavingRichards’sbankruptcydismissed.ThedistrictcourtdismissedthecomplaintbecauseRichardsdidnotseekpermissionfromthebankruptcycourtbeforesuingthetrustee.SeeInreLinton ,136F.3d544,545(7thCir.1998).Richardsfiledanappealfromthatdecision,butwedismissed itforfailuretopaythedocketingfee.FourteenmonthslaterRichardsaskedthedistrictcourttovacateitsdismissalunderFederalNONPRECEDENTIALDISPOSITIONTobecitedonlyinaccordancewithFed.R.App.P.32.1No.084193 Page2RuleofCivilProcedure60(b)(4)onthegroundthat thedecisionwasvoid.Thedistrictcourtdeniedthatrequest,andRichardsnowappeals.Rule60(b)(4)isintendedforcaseswhere thedistrictcourtissuingtheunderlyingjudgmentlackedjurisdictionoractedinamannerinconsistentwithdueprocess.Marquesv.Fed.ReserveBankofChi. ,286F.3d1014,1018(7thCir.2002);RobinsonEng’gCo.PensionPlan&Trustv.George ,223F.3d445,448(7thCir.2000).Onappeal,Richardsraisesnochallengebasedonjurisdictionordueprocess,andinsteadattackstheunderlyingdismissalofhiscomplaint.ButRule60(b)isnotapermissiblesubstituteforappealingthejudgment,see,e.g.,Bellv.EastmanKodakCo. ,214F.3d798,80001(7thCir.2000),andthetimetopursueanappealhaslongpassed.Accordingly,thejudgmentisAFFIRMED.
ex108.htm






Exhibit 10.8


Schedule of Board Fees












The Compensation Committee and Board of Directors of Lakeland Financial Corporation adopted the following fee schedule effective January 1, 2011:


 



	
Annual Director Retainer:

	  	
$

	
 25,000

	  	  
	
Annual Audit Committee Chairman Retainer:

	  	
$

	
 29,000

	  	  
	
Annual Lead Director and Compensation Committee Chairman Retainer:

	  	
$

	
 29,000

	  	  
	
Annual Governance Committee Chairman Retainer:

	  	
$

	
26,000

	  	  
	
Board Meeting Fee:                                                                               

	  	
$

	
1,000

	  	
per meeting


	
Committee Meeting Fee:                                                                               

	  	
$

	
 700

	  	
per meeting


	
Annual stock grant:

	  	  	
1,000

	  	
shares
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 23, 2014

p1022

Order 

Clerk

October 23, 2014

149290

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 149290

COA: 317447 

Oakland CC: 2012-243299-FH

CYNTHIA ANN MAZUR,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 1, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). 

The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order 

addressing whether the defendant is entitled to immunity under § 4 of the Michigan 

Medical Marihuana Act (MMMA), MCL 333.26421 et seq., specifically 

MCL 333.26424(g) and/or MCL 333.26424(i), where her spouse was a registered 

qualifying patient and primary caregiver under the act, but his marijuana-related activities 

inside the family home were not in full compliance with the act. The parties should not 

submit mere restatements of their application papers. 

We direct the Clerk to schedule the oral argument in this case for the same future 

session of this Court when it will hear oral argument in People v Hartwick (Docket No. 

148444), and People v Tuttle (Docket No. 148971).
****
 **EXHIBIT
31.4**
 
 **Certification
Pursuant to Section 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Christine
M. Carriker (HouseRaising Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative
Officer)**
 
 I,
Christine M. Carriker, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 of
HouseRaising, Inc. (“registrant”);
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information (all of which do not apply); and
 
 b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls (all of which do
not apply).
 
 Date: May
16, 2005
 
 
 
 
 /s/
Christine M. Carriker
 _____________________
 Christine
M. Carriker
 Senior
Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer
 (Principal
Accounting Officer)
No. 09-1037.

#### Patricia A. Wilson, Petitioner v. Roberts J. Adams & Associates.

559 U.S. 1092, 130 S. Ct. 2379,

176 L. Ed. 2d 768,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3638,

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 389 Ill. App. 3d 1149, 364 Ill. Dec. 647, 976 N.E.2d 1210.
#### Alexander-Martin Realty Company, *Appellant,*v. G. F. Davis and Hattie Davis, his Wife; Bank of Sebastian, a Florida Corporation; H. J. Dame and Walter M. Rogers, Co-partners, Doing Business as Dame & Rogers, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision Filed January 16, 1928.

*Fee é Liddon,*for Appellant.

*James T. Voeelle,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and *67inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          82,985
<SECURITIES>                                   932,513
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,106
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               507,261
<PP&E>                                      16,041,642
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,732,073
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,749,343
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          903,769
<BONDS>                                     12,931,003
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,749,343
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,858,298
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,504,471
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               529,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,201,841
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (378,007)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (38.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Bobby James NEWELL, Employee-Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL TIRE THE AMERICAS, Self-Insured, Employer-Defendant-Appellee.

Part of the Continental Tire the Americas Consolidated Asbestos Matters.

No. COA18-767

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 3, 2019

AFFIRMED.
# C_2017253EN.01000201.xml

| 4.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8521 — Segro/PSPIB/SELP/CAT Site)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 253/03)

On 11 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8521. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8521. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Elizabeth BALL, Employee v. BAYADA HOME HEALTH CARE, Employer, Arch Insurance Group, Inc., Carrier (Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., Third-Party Administrator)

No. 161P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Joy H. Brewer, Attorney at Law, for Bayada Home Health Care, et al.

Thomas F. Ramer, Attorney at Law, Asheville, for Ball, Elizabeth.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of April 2019 by Defendants for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants on the 30th of April 2019 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 30th of April 2019 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Davis, J. recused
Exhibit 32

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


I, Jun Ma,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of  Vasomedical,  Inc. (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of the  Company  for the  fiscal  year
          ended  May  31,  2009  (the   "Report"),   fully   complies  with  the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934; and
     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: August 21, 2009

                                     /s/ Jun Ma
                                     -------------------------------------
                                     Jun Ma
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer





I,  Tarachand  Singh,   Chief  Financial  Officer  of  Vasomedical,   Inc.  (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of the  Company  for the  fiscal  year
          ended  May  31,  2009  (the   "Report"),   fully   complies  with  the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934; and
     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: August 21, 2009

                                 /s/ Tarachand Singh
                                 -----------------------
                                 Tarachand Singh
                                 Chief Financial Officer