alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

JERMAINE LEWIS ,

Appellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 22

- 1054 LT Case No. 05

- 1996

- CF

- 0290551

- C STATE OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Opinion filed Augu st 19, 2022 3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County , Samuel Bookhardt , Judge. Jermaine Lewis, Orlando, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman , Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Due to Appellant’s ap parent abuse of th e legal process by his abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgment and
sentence in Brevard County Circuit Court Case Number 05

- 1996

- CF

0290551

- C , this Court issued an order directing Appellan t to show cause2

why he sho uld not be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer , 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Having carefully considered the response and finding it fails to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that Appellant is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings. In order to conserve judicial res ources, Appellant is prohibited from filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning Brevard County Circuit Court Case No. 05

- 1996

- CF

- 0290551

- C . The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning the refere nced case. The Clerk will summarily reject any future filings regarding the referenced case unless filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State , 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough.”). The Clerk is furthe r directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary proceedings. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2019) ; Simpkins v. State , 909 So. 2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). FUTURE PRO SE FILINGS PROHIBITED.

LAMBERT, C.J. , COHEN and TRAVER , JJ., concur.
MEMORANDUM 

To: expartecommunications@hq.doe.gov 

From: Douglas Johnson 

Date: May 22, 2013 

Re: Docket No. EERE–2012–BT–TP–0046; RIN 1904–AC52 

 Ex parte communication 

 Meeting of May 16, 2013 

This memorandum for the record provides a summary of a meeting involving representatives of the 

Consumer Electronics Association and National Cable & Telecommunications Association with Dr. 

David Danielson, Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. 

Meeting attendees and affiliations: 

Daniel Alvarez (AARIS) 

Ashley Armstrong (DOE) 

Jeffrey Blum (DISH Network)

Dr. David Danielson (DOE) 

Paul Glist (National Cable & Telecommunications Association) 

Kathleen Hogan (DOE) 

Douglas Johnson (Consumer Electronics Association) 

Rita Lewis (NCTA) 

Marissa Mitrovich (Verizon) 

Mr. Glist reviewed the industry’s Set-top Box Energy Conservation Agreement, including the scope 

and nature of the Agreement, the energy savings benefits and timelines, and the current status of 

activities supporting implementation of the Agreement. Mr. Glist also reviewed the concerns raised 

by industry in recent comments to DOE regarding DOE’s rulemaking for set-top boxes.
Antonieo D. CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 105375

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Filed: May 15, 2018

Alexandria A. Shah, Saint Louis, MO, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Antonieo D. Clark appeals from a judgment denying his Mo. Sup. Ct. Rule 29.15 (2014) amended motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. Sup. Ct. Rule 84.16(b) (2018).
IN RE: Charles Everette HINTON

449P11-22

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Charles E. Hinton, For Hinton, Charles Everette.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of June 2019 by Plaintiff for En Banc Judicial Writ for Sequestration:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Ervin, J. recused
Specimen Common Stock Certificate




	
	 Exhibit 4.1

 





  
 Exhibit 4.1 
 NUMBER 
 MJN 
 SHARES 
 COMMON STOCK 
 INCORPORATED UNDER 
 THE LAWS OF THE STATE 
 OF DELAWARE 
 MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITION COMPANY 
 THIS CERTIFICATE IS TRANSFERABLE IN JERSEY CITY, NJ, NEW YORK, NY AND PITTSBURGH, PA 
 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 
 This
Certifies that 
 CUSIP 582839 10 6 
 is the owner of 
 SPECIMEN 
 FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $0.01 PAR VALUE, OF 
 MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITION COMPANY 
 transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. 
 This certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. 
 WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. 
 Dated: 
 MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITION COMPANY 
 CORPORATE 
 SEAL 
 2008 
 DELAWARE 
 Mead Johnson Nutrition TM 
 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 
 Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary 
 COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: 

MELLON INVESTOR SERVICES LLC 
 TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR 
 BY: 
 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 








 

 

  
 The following
abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
 TEN COM – as tenants in common 
 TEN ENT – as tenants by the entireties 
 JT
TEN – as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common 
 UNIF GIFT MIN ACT –
Custodian 
 (Cust) (Minor) 
 under Uniform Gifts to Minors 
 Act 
 (State) 
 UNIF TRF MIN ACT – Custodian (until age) 
 (Cust) 
 under Uniform Transfers 
 (Minor) 
 to Minors Act 
 (State) 
 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 
 FOR VALUE
RECEIVED,             hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 
 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER 
 IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 
 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) 
 Shares of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint

 Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of
substitution in the premises. 
 Dated             

 X              
 X              
 NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN
EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. 
 Signature(s) Guaranteed

 By 
 THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED MEDALLION
SIGNATURE GUARANTEE PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
EXHIBIT
      32.2




Written
      Statement of Principal Financial Officer Furnished Pursuant to


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


as
      Adopted by


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of HouseRaising, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. von
      Gnechten, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of
      my
      knowledge, that:




(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition as of June 30, 2007 and results of operations for the
      quarter ended June 30, 2007 of the Company and its subsidiaries.






/s/
      Richard A. von Gnechten





Richard
      A. von Gnechten


Chief
      Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)





August
      14, 2007





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [LLMTC03000-L10200000-PK0000] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Dakotas Resource Advisory Council will meet as indicated below. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held April 16 and 17, 2009. The meeting will begin at 1 p.m. on April 16, 2009. The public comment period will begin at 8 a.m. on Friday, April 17, 2009. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Holiday Inn, 305 North 27th Street, Spearfish, South Dakota, 57783. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The 15-member Council advises the Secretary of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of planning and management issues associated with public land management in North and South Dakota. All meetings are open to the public. The public may present written comments to the Council. Each formal Council meeting will also have time allocated for hearing public comments.                           ( print page 10611)                        Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual oral comments may be limited. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation, or other reasonable accommodations, should contact the BLM as provided below. The Council will hear updates to Sage Grouse Conservation studies, recreation fees and resource management planning issues and ongoing efforts.                 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lonny Bagley, Field Manager, North Dakota Field Office, 99 23rd Avenue West, Dickinson, North Dakota, 701.227.7700, or Marian Atkins, Field Manager, South Dakota Field Office, 310 Roundup St., Belle Fourche, South Dakota, 605.892.7000. 

Dated: March 4, 2009. 

Lonny R. Bagley, 

Field Manager.

[FR Doc. E9-5151 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
No. 09-8034.

#### Arthur Lee Griggs, Petitioner v. Grantt Culliver, Warden.

559 U.S. 948, 130 S. Ct. 1527,

176 L. Ed. 2d 128,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1185.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 48 (Friday, March 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10950]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5425]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Initial 
Review Group, Training and Career Development Subcommittee.
    Date: March 17-18, 2009.
    Open: March 17, 2009, 8:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m.
    Agenda: Concept review.
    Place: Ritz Canton Hotel, 1150 22nd Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20037.
    Closed: March 17, 2009, 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Ritz Carlton Hotel, 1150 22nd Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20037.
    Closed: March 18, 2009, 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Ritz Carlton Hotel, 1150 22nd Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20037.
    Contact Person: Eliane Lazar-Wesley, PhD, Health Scientist 
Administrator, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on 
Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Room 220, MSC 8401, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-8401, 301-451-4530, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#abcec79dd9ebc5c2c385ccc4dd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a3c6cf95d1e3cdcacb8dc4ccd5">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 6, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
 [FR Doc. E9-5425 Filed 3-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  1)
    
    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months
ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the three months ended June 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Plumas Bancorp.
 Date: August 9, 2006
    
    /s/ D. N. Biddle

Douglas N. Biddle, Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this quarterly report of Texas United Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey A. Wilkinson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Jeffrey A. Wilkinson                            
|Jeffrey A. Wilkinson                                
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|November 17, 2005
Jermaine PATE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 105414

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

FILED: March 27, 2018

Appellant Acting Pro se Jermaine C. Pate, Moberly Correctional Center, Moberly, MO.

Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Jermaine Pate ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*624The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
#### Alfred TAYLOR, Appellant, v. Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 21735.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

May 24, 1965.

Alfred Taylor, pro se.

Sam R. Wilson, Houston, Tex., Lonny F. Zwiener, Asst. Attys. Gen. of Texas, Waggoner Carr, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Stanton Stone, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Howard M. Fender, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for appellee.

Before BROWN and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and KILKENNY* District Judge.

*

 Of the District of Oregon, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

As is true in Reyes v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1965, 345 F.2d 722, decided by us this date, this appeal challenges the constitutional fairness of the Texas procedure oj allowing the indictment allegations oi prior felony convictions to be read to the jury in a Habitual Offender prosecution. The District Court’s decision must likewise be affirmed on the basis of Breen v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1965, 341 F.2d 96. See also Reed v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1965, 343 F.2d 723 [April 7, 1965]; see Stephens v. State, 1964, Tex.Cr.App., 377 S.W.2d 189, cert. denied, 1965, 85 S.Ct. 1344 [April 26, 1965].

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.30





Exhibit 10.30




First Amendment to the




CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORPORATION




SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN




As Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2009



 


 









 







First Amendment to the Chesapeake Utilities Corporation Supplemental

Executive Retirement Plan




Background Information





	A.	 	The Plan was amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2009, to comply with the
requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).
From and after January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2008, the Plan, to the extent not
grandfathered, was subject to and operated in accordance with a good faith interpretation of
Code Section 409A, including the use of any applicable transition rules in effect during such
period.







	B.	 	The Internal Revenue Service, in Notice 2010-6, provided guidance regarding document drafting
failures and ambiguities that may be corrected or clarified without adverse tax implications.







	C.	 	Chesapeake Utilities Corporation, as the Plan’s sponsor, desires to make certain clarifying
amendments to the Plan to ensure its interpretation and operation continue in accordance with
the requirements of Code Section 409A, as permitted by Section IV of Notice 2010-6.






Amendment




Chesapeake Utilities Corporation hereby amends the Plan as set forth below, effective as of
January 1, 2009:




	1.	 	Article IV of the Plan, “Termination of Employment,” is hereby amended by the addition of new
Section 4.3 to read as follows:







“4.3 General Limitations. Notwithstanding Sections 4.1 and 4.2 above, in no event
will any payments due to be paid to a Group B Executive under the Plan be either delayed or
accelerated as to time of payment or changed as to form of payment in a manner that would
violate Code Section 409A (i) by reason of the applicability of such Sections, or (ii)
during the pendency of any determinations to be made under such Sections. Rather, if either
Section 4.1 or 4.2 is determined to be applicable to a Group B Participant, such Section
shall be enforced against the Group B Participant by causing him or her to forfeit all
remaining future payments due from and after the date of determination of the violation of
either Section 4.1 or 4.2.”


 


 









 






	2.	 	Section 6.5 of the Plan, “Benefit Claims Procedure,” is hereby amended by the addition of the
following at the end thereof:







“Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Group B Participant shall not be required to file a claim
in order for benefits to commence in accordance with the Participant’s election of the time
and form of payment. If a Group B Participant is denied a benefit to which the
Participant believes he or she is entitled, the Group B Participant may appeal such benefit
denial in accordance with the procedures for claim appeals under the Pension Plan.”



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORPORATION	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By: 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	Its: 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	Date:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SEC.1350) I, Sherice P. Bench, Chief Financial Officer of American Achievement Corporation and AAC Group
Holding Corp. (the Companies), hereby certify that: (1) The Quarterly Report of the Companies on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 28, 2005 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Companies as of the dates and for the periods
expressed in the Report. Date: July 12, 2005 By:
    
    /s/ SHERICE P. BENCHSherice P. BenchCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER(principal financial officer)
#### In re Will of MARK WALTON.

(Filed 28 September, 1949.)

Caveators’ appeal from *Bone, J.,*February Term, 1949, Bertie Superior Court.

*Hermán L. Taylor for caveators, appellants.*

*J. B. Davenport, J. W. Parker, and J. A. Pritchett for propounders, appellees.*

Per Curiam.

The heirs at law of Mark Walton, deceased, filed a caveat to his will and it was offered for probate in solemn form. An issue as to mental capacity of the testator, and the usual issue of *devisavit vel non*were submitted, and both answered favorably to the propounders. From the ensuing judgment caveators appeal, assigning error in the admission of evidence and in the charge of the court.

*758Full consideration bas been given to the exceptions and they are found to be withoivt merit. The judgment is, therefore,

Affirmed.