[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 49 (Monday, March 16, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11045-11049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5560]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

16 CFR Part 305

[RIN 3084-AB03]


Rule Concerning Disclosures Regarding Energy Consumption and 
Water Use of Certain Home Appliances and Other Products Required Under 
the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (``Appliance Labeling Rule'')

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission (FTC or Commission).

ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Section 325 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 
2007 provides the Commission with authority to promulgate energy 
labeling rules for consumer electronics, including televisions. The 
Commission is seeking comment on whether it should require labels for 
televisions and other consumer electronic products.

DATES: Comments must be received by May 14, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments 
electronically or in paper form. Comments should refer to ``Consumer 
Electronics Labeling, Project No. P094201'' to facilitate the 
organization of comments. Please note that comments will be placed on 
the public record of this proceeding--including on the publicly 
accessible FTC website, at (http://www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm)--and therefore should not include any sensitive or 
confidential information. In particular, comments should not include 
any sensitive personal information, such as an individual's Social 
Security Number; date of birth; driver's license number or other state 
identification number, or foreign country equivalent; passport number; 
financial account number; or credit or debit card number. Comments also 
should not include any sensitive health information, such as medical 
records or other individually identifiable health information. In 
addition, comments should not include any ``[t]rade secrets and 
commercial or financial information obtained from a person and 
privileged or confidential . . . .,'' as provided in Section 6(f) of 
the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and Commission Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 
4.10(a)(2). Comments containing material for which confidential 
treatment is requested must be filed in paper form, must be clearly 
labeled ``Confidential,'' and must comply with FTC Rule 4.9(c).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ FTC Rule 4.2(d), 16 CFR 4.2(d). The comment must be 
accompanied by an explicit request for confidential treatment, 
including the factual and legal basis for the request, and must 
identify the specific portions of the comment to be withheld from 
the public record. The request will be granted or denied by the 
Commission's General Counsel, consistent with applicable law and the 
public interest. See FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Because paper mail addressed to the FTC is subject to delay due to 
heightened security screening, please consider submitting your comments 
in electronic form. Comments filed in electronic form should be 
submitted by using the following weblink: (https://secure.commentworks.com/ftc-electronicslabeling) (and following the 
instructions on the web-based form). To ensure that the Commission 
considers an electronic comment, you must file it on the web-based form 
at the weblink (https://secure.commentworks.com/ftc-electronicslabeling). If this Notice appears at (http://www.regulations.gov/search/index.jsp,) you may also file an electronic 
comment through that website. The Commission will consider all comments 
that regulations.gov forwards to it. You may also visit the FTC website 
at http://www.ftc.gov to read the Notice and the news release 
describing it.
    A comment filed in paper form should include the ``Consumer 
Electronics Labeling, Project No. P094201'' reference both in the text 
and on the envelope, and should be mailed or delivered to the following 
address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Room H-135 
(Annex T), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20580. The FTC 
requests that any comment filed in paper form be sent by courier or 
overnight service, if possible, because U.S. postal mail in the 
Washington area and at the Commission is subject to delay due to 
heightened security precautions.
    The FTC Act and other laws the Commission administers permit the 
collection of public comments to consider and use in this proceeding as 
appropriate. The Commission will consider all timely and responsive 
public comments that it receives, whether filed in paper or electronic 
form. Comments received will be available to the public on the FTC

[[Page 11046]]

website, to the extent practicable, at (http://www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm.) As a matter of discretion, the Commission makes 
every effort to remove home contact information for individuals from 
the public comments it receives before placing those comments on the 
FTC website. More information, including routine uses permitted by the 
Privacy Act, may be found in the FTC's privacy policy, at (http://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.shtm.)

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hampton Newsome, Attorney, (202) 326-
2889, Division of Enforcement, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC 
20580.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 325 of the Energy Independence and 
Security Act of 2007 (EISA or the Act) (Pub. L. 110-140) gives the 
Commission authority to require energy labeling for five categories of 
consumer electronic products. In accordance with that Act, the 
Commission is seeking comment on labeling for such products. This 
Notice provides information about current energy labeling requirements, 
the FTC's new authority for consumer electronics labeling, background 
on previous FTC labeling activities related to these products, 
potential television labeling, potential labeling for other consumer 
electronics, and a series of questions for commenters.

I. Current Energy Labeling Requirements

    Section 324 of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) (42 
U.S.C. 6294) requires the FTC to prescribe labeling rules for the 
disclosure of estimated annual energy costs or alternative energy 
consumption information for a variety of products covered by the 
statute, including home appliances (e.g., refrigerators, clothes 
washers, and dishwashers), lighting, and plumbing products.\2\ For most 
covered products, labels must disclose energy information derived from 
Department of Energy (DOE) test procedures.\3\ The Commission may also 
require sellers, including retailers, to disclose energy information 
found on the label in any printed material displayed or distributed at 
the point of sale. In addition, the Commission may direct manufacturers 
to provide energy-related disclosures including instructions for the 
maintenance, use, or repair of the covered product.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ For most appliances, the Commission must prescribe labeling 
rules unless it determines that labeling is not technologically or 
economically feasible (42 U.S.C. 6294(a)(1)). For central air 
conditioners, heat pumps, furnaces, and clothes washers, the statute 
requires labeling unless the Commission finds that labeling is not 
technologically or economically feasible or is not likely to assist 
consumers in making purchasing decisions (42 U.S.C. 6294(a)(2)(A)). 
Pursuant to Section 6294(a)(1), the Commission determined not to 
require labeling for television sets, kitchen ranges, ovens, clothes 
dryers, humidifiers, dehumidifiers, and certain home heating 
equipment other than furnaces. See 44 FR 66466, 66468-66469 (Nov. 
19, 1979).
    \3\ Section 323 of EPCA (42 U.S.C. 6293) directs DOE to develop 
test procedures for major household appliances. Manufacturers must 
follow these test procedures to determine their products' compliance 
with DOE's energy conservation standards (required by Section 325 of 
EPCA), and to derive the energy consumption or efficiency values to 
put on required labels.
    \4\ 42 U.S.C. 6294(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission implements EPCA's directive through the Appliance 
Labeling Rule (16 CFR Part 305). Under the Rule, appliance 
manufacturers must disclose specific energy use information at the 
point of sale in the form of a yellow ``EnergyGuide'' label affixed to 
each unit. This information also must appear in catalogs and on 
Internet sites from which covered products can be ordered. Labels for 
most appliances must provide the product's estimated annual operating 
cost as the primary disclosure. To calculate these operating cost 
estimates, manufacturers must use national average cost figures for 
energy (e.g., electricity, natural gas, etc.) determined by DOE. The 
Rule also allows manufacturers to place the U.S. Government ENERGY STAR 
logo on labels for products that qualify for that program.\5\ Required 
labels for appliances must include a ``range of comparability'' 
(published by the Commission) that shows, for most products, the 
highest and lowest operating cost of all similar appliance models. 
These ranges help consumers compare similar models.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ ENERGY STAR is a voluntary labeling program that identifies 
high efficiency products. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 
and DOE administer the ENERGY STAR program. See http://www.energystar.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission's Rule also requires manufacturers of most covered 
products to file data reports with the FTC. These reports must contain 
the estimated annual energy consumption or energy efficiency ratings 
for the appliances derived from tests performed pursuant to the DOE 
test procedures (16 CFR 305.8(b)).\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See 42 U.S.C. 6296(b)(2)&(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. FTC's New Authority for Consumer Electronics Labeling

    Section 325 of EISA amends EPCA to direct the Commission to 
prescribe labeling for televisions, personal computers, cable or 
satellite set-top boxes, stand-alone digital video recorder boxes, and 
personal computer monitors.\7\ The Act also specifically provides the 
Commission with discretion to consider other types of energy 
disclosures for consumers in lieu of traditional product labeling for 
these consumer electronics.\8\ The Commission must issue such 
requirements no later than 18 months after DOE publishes applicable 
test procedures for such products. In the absence of such test 
procedures, the Commission has discretion to require labeling if it 
identifies adequate non-DOE testing procedures, and determines that 
disclosure requirements for those products are likely to assist 
consumers in making purchasing decisions.\9\ EISA also gives the 
Commission discretion to require comparative information on the label 
or in other disclosures. Finally, the amendments provide the Commission 
with authority to require labeling or other disclosures for any other 
consumer product if the FTC determines such labeling is likely to 
assist consumers in making purchasing decisions.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ However, the Act states that the requirements would not 
apply in any case in which the Commission determines that the rules 
would not be technologically or economically feasible or would not 
be likely to assist consumers in making purchasing decisions. See 
EISA, Section 325 (42 U.S.C. 6294(a)).
    \8\ The Act directs the Commission to ``prescribe labeling or 
other disclosure requirements for the energy use of'' the covered 
consumer electronic products. 42 U.S.C. 6294(a)(2)(I)(i).
    \9\ Any FTC labeling requirements must become effective 18 
months after they are issued. 42 U.S.C. 6294(a)(2)(I)(iii).
    \10\ Under EPCA, a ``consumer product'' means any article which 
consumes, or is designed to consume energy and which, to any 
significant extent, is distributed in commerce for personal use or 
consumption by individuals. 42 U.S.C. 6291(1). As with the five 
consumer electronic categories specifically listed in the EISA 
amendments, the FTC may identify a non-DOE test procedure for 
labeling such additional consumer products (in the absence of a DOE 
test procedure) and has discretion to require comparative 
information on the label.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Television Labeling

    The Commission is seeking comment on possible energy labeling or 
similar disclosures for televisions. As discussed in more detail below, 
the Commission did not require television labeling in its original 1979 
Rule. In 2007, the Commission revisited this issue but declined to 
require television labeling because the existing DOE test procedure was 
inapplicable to modern televisions. Because EISA now allows the FTC to 
use non-DOE test procedures for television labeling requirements, we 
are seeking comment on whether to require labeling based on a new test 
procedure recently adopted by EPA's ENERGY

[[Page 11047]]

STAR program. We also seek comment on whether there are other test 
procedures we should consider.
    Televisions have been covered products under EPCA since the 1970's. 
In 1979, the Commission determined not to require labeling because 
there was little variation in the annual energy costs of competing 
television models and such costs were a small fraction of the purchase 
price. The Commission, therefore, believed it was unlikely that labels 
for televisions would promote industry efforts to increase energy 
efficiency, or provide benefits to consumers.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 44 FR 66466, 66468 (Nov. 19, 1979).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In 2007, the FTC revisited the issue and sought comment on whether 
the Rule should require television labeling.\12\ Several commenters 
urged the Commission to require labeling. The comments suggested that 
many modern televisions use as much, or more, electricity than products 
currently labeled under the Rule. In addition, comments indicated that 
there is a significant range of energy use among similar products on 
the market.\13\ The energy consumption characteristics of televisions, 
therefore, appear to be significantly different than when the 
Commission decided to forgo labeling in the 1970's. After considering 
these comments, the Commission concluded that energy labeling for 
televisions may assist consumers in making purchasing decisions.\14\ At 
the same time, however, the record indicated that current DOE test 
procedures were inadequate to test most televisions on the market. 
Because the law at that time required the use of DOE test procedures, 
the Commission decided not to proceed further until the DOE test 
procedure was revised.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 72 FR 6836, 6857 (Feb. 13, 2007).
    \13\ According to the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), 
there are now many ``large-screen'' digital televisions on the 
market that use 500 or more kilowatt-hours per year, as much energy 
as many new refrigerators. NRDC (<greek-i>519870-00025). At an FTC 
public workshop held during the 2007 proceeding, one participant 
suggested that the average 42-inch plasma television draws 334 
watts, with models ranging from 201 watts to 520 watts. Workshop Tr. 
at 198 (http://www.ftc.gov/os/comments/energylabeling-workshop/060503wrkshoptrnscript.pdf).
    \14\ See 72 FR 49948, 49962 (Aug. 29, 2007).
    \15\ 72 FR at 6858 (Feb. 13, 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The most recent EPCA amendments allow the Commission to consider 
non-DOE test procedures for television labeling. EPA's ENERGY STAR 
program has adopted criteria for televisions based on specific 
international test procedures (Section 11 of ``IEC 62087, Ed. 2.0: 
Methods of Measurement for the Power Consumption of Audio, Video and 
Related Equipment'' and ``IEC 62301, Ed. 1.0: Household Electrical 
Appliances - Measurement of Standby Power'').\16\ The procedures 
require manufacturers to measure the power consumed by televisions when 
the products are on and in standby mode. Given these existing ENERGY 
STAR procedures and the comments received in response to the 2007 
proceeding, the Commission is considering television labeling again and 
seeks comment on adoption of the IEC procedures (and any other 
appropriate procedures) for labeling purposes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See International Electrotechnical Commission (http://www.iec.ch/); and ``ENERGY STAR Program Requirements for Televisions 
Eligibility Criteria (Version 3.0)'' (http://www.energystar.gov/ia/partners/product_specs/eligibility/tv_vcr_elig.pdf).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission also is seeking comment on the appropriate format 
for television energy use disclosures. The Appliance Labeling Rule 
follows a consistent approach for labeling most large covered products 
displayed in showrooms. In particular, the Rule requires manufacturers 
to affix a yellow EnergyGuide label that displays yearly operating cost 
as the primary energy disclosure for the product. The Commission is 
seeking comment on whether such an approach is appropriate for 
televisions or whether there are alternative formats and locations for 
the disclosure of energy information.\17\ Although televisions 
routinely appear in showrooms, the configuration of these products may 
raise placement issues not present with appliances such as 
refrigerators or clothes washers. For example, it may be difficult to 
affix labels on the products themselves in a location that is visible 
to consumers without blocking the television screen. As detailed in 
Section III of this Notice, the Commission is seeking input on a 
variety of issues related to television disclosures, including the need 
for such disclosures, the format and placement of information, 
comparative information, usage assumptions, and test procedures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ The current EnergyGuide label is the product of a two-year 
rulemaking effort concluded in 2007. During that proceeding, the 
Commission solicited comment about various label designs including 
energy use or efficiency disclosures, annual operating cost 
disclosures, and a five-star rating system (i.e., a ``categorical'' 
label). Based on consumer research and the comments received during 
that proceeding, the Commission revised the EnergyGuide label to 
feature prominently annual operating costs on the label. Because 
this research on showroom products was so recent, we do not plan to 
duplicate that labeling research for televisions. See 72 FR 49948 
(Aug. 29, 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Other Consumer Electronic Products

    The Commission is also seeking information about potential labeling 
requirements for personal computers, cable or satellite set-top boxes, 
stand-alone digital video recorder boxes, personal computer monitors, 
and other consumer electronic products. Although currently there are no 
DOE tests for these products, EISA gives the Commission the discretion 
to require energy disclosures for them using non-DOE test procedures. 
Therefore, the Commission is seeking comment on the need for such 
disclosures, any appropriate test procedures, the format of labels or 
disclosures, and the placement of labels on the products. We are also 
seeking comment on a series of questions about potential labeling 
detailed in Section III of this Notice.

III. Request for Comment

    The Commission seeks written comments on a series of questions 
related to labeling for televisions and other consumer electronic 
products. We invite interested persons to submit written comments on 
any issue of fact, law, or policy that may bear upon the FTC's labeling 
requirements. The Commission encourages commenters to respond to the 
specific questions. However, commenters do not need to respond to all 
questions. Please provide explanations for your answers and supporting 
evidence where appropriate. After examining the comments, the 
Commission will determine whether to propose any specific amendments.

A. Televisions

    To facilitate the Commission's efforts to consider energy 
disclosures for televisions, we request that commenters consider the 
following questions and issues:
    1. Need for Labeling:
    a. Would labeling or other energy disclosures for televisions 
``assist consumers in making purchasing decisions''? Why or why not?
    b. Is there any evidence that labeling or energy disclosures for 
televisions would ``not be technologically or economically feasible''? 
If so, please provide such information.
    c. What benefits, if any, would labeling or other energy 
disclosures provide for consumers and businesses (including small 
businesses)? What costs, if any, would such labeling or other energy 
disclosures impose on consumers and businesses (including small 
businesses)?
    2. Energy Use Data: Is there data regarding energy use of 
televisions in the market? Is there data that shows a significant 
difference in the energy use of other models? What are the typical 
annual energy costs of each product?
    3. Reports, Studies, or Research: Do any recent reports, studies, 
or research

[[Page 11048]]

provide data relevant to energy use, operating costs, and labeling for 
televisions in the United States or other countries?\18\ If so, please 
provide such reports, studies, or research.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ When statistical or scientific data is presented, the 
Commission requests enough detail about data, study design, 
statistical analysis, and findings to enable it to understand the 
methodology that was used to conduct the analysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    4. Test Procedures: If the Commission were to require labeling, 
should the Commission require the use of Section 11 of ``IEC 62087, Ed. 
2.0: Methods of Measurement for the Power Consumption of Audio, Video 
and Related Equipment'' and ``IEC 62301, Ed. 1.0: Household Electrical 
Appliances - Measurement of Standby Power'' as adopted by ENERGY STAR 
for television labeling purposes? What are the advantages and 
disadvantages to adopting the ENERGY STAR procedures?
    a. Usage Rates: To derive annual operating cost figures for 
potential disclosures, the Rule must require standard usage assumptions 
for televisions (e.g., 5 hours per day). EPA's Eligibility Criteria 
(Section 3) uses annual power consumption estimates on a daily usage 
pattern of 5 hours in ``On Mode'' and 19 hours in ``standby.'' If the 
FTC were to require labeling or other energy disclosures, should the 
FTC adopt EPA's usage patterns? What are the advantages and 
disadvantages to adopting such usage patterns?
    b. Other Test Procedure Issues: Are there any issues not addressed 
by Section 11 of IEC 62087 that the Commission should address in a 
potential Rule? Are there any aspects of the ENERGY STAR criteria (not 
otherwise contained in IEC 62087 or IEC 62301) that the Commission 
should incorporate into its labeling requirements? In particular, 
ENERGY STAR (Section 4.E.2.) has specifications that go beyond the IEC 
test procedure regarding input signal levels, broadcast test materials, 
true power factor, testing at default factory settings, and automatic 
brightness control. Should the FTC adopt any of these particular EPA 
specifications in its requirements? If so, which ones and why? If not, 
which ones and why not?
    c. Alternative Test Procedures: Are there any other test procedures 
the Commission should adopt in lieu of the ENERGY STAR procedure? If 
so, please explain why the Commission should adopt such procedures. 
What are the advantages and disadvantages to adopting such alternative 
procedures?
    5. Format, Content, and Placement: If the Commission were to 
require labeling or other energy disclosures, how should it require 
manufacturers or other sellers to disclose such information? Should 
television labels follow the same ``EnergyGuide'' format, content, and 
placement requirements applicable to other covered showroom products 
such as refrigerators? What form should the label take (e.g., hang tag, 
adhesive label, static cling label)?
    a. Retailer Role: What role should retailers have, if any, in 
providing these disclosures?\19\ Should retailers have a responsibility 
for the placement of disclosures in brick and mortar stores? If so, 
what should this responsibility be?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ Section 324(c)(4) of EPCA (42 U.S.C. 6294(c)(4)) states: 
``A rule under this section applicable to a covered product may 
require disclosure, in any printed matter displayed or distributed 
at the point of sale of such product, of any information which may 
be required under this section to be disclosed on the label of such 
product.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    b. Internet Disclosures: Should the Commission consider energy 
disclosure options that do not provide consumer information at the 
point of purchase in the form of a label or other in-store disclosures 
(e.g., Internet-only disclosures with no labeling on the product or 
product package)? If so, what should be the format, content, and 
placement of such disclosures? Should such Internet disclosures (and 
other catalog disclosures) be any different than those for other 
covered products under the Rule (such as refrigerators)?
    6. Comparative Information: What comparative information, if any, 
should the Rule require on labels or in other disclosures about the 
energy use of televisions?
    a. Should the Commission require disclosure of a range of 
comparability similar to EnergyGuide labels for other covered products? 
If not, why not? If so, how should such comparative information be 
organized? Should the comparisons be made across model types or 
technologies (e.g., LCD, plasma, screen resolutions, etc.)? Should the 
Commission limit comparative information to screen size (e.g., 1' to 
20', 21' to 29', 30' to 39', 40' to 49', 50' to 59', and 60' or more)? 
Should the Commission use some other approach for establishing such 
categories? If so, what approach? What would be the advantages and 
disadvantages to such an approach?
    b. Is there information available from which to develop approximate 
ranges for labeling purposes or should the Commission wait for 
manufacturers to test all their products and submit such data to the 
Commission?
    7. Reporting Requirements: What data, if any, should the Rule 
require manufacturers to submit to the FTC?\20\ Should the Commission 
use the data in developing ranges of comparability (e.g., ranges 
organized by screen size)?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ Under 42 U.S.C. 6296(b)(2), ``[i]f requested by the 
Secretary or Commission, the manufacturer of a covered product to 
which a rule under section 6294 of this title applies shall provide, 
within 30 days of the date of the request, the data from which the 
information included on the label and required by the rule was 
derived.'' In addition, 42 U.S.C. 6296(b)(4) states, ``[e]ach 
manufacturer of a covered product to which a rule under section 6294 
of this title applies shall annually, at a time specified by the 
Commission, supply to the Commission relevant data respecting energy 
consumption or water use developed in accordance with the test 
procedures applicable to such product under section 6293 of this 
title.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Other Consumer Electronics

    To facilitate the Commission's consideration of energy disclosures 
for personal computers, personal computer monitors, cable or satellite 
set-top boxes, stand-alone digital video recorder boxes, and other 
consumer electronic products, we request that commenters respond to the 
following questions and issues:
    1. Need for Energy Disclosures:
    a. Should the Commission require labeling or other energy 
disclosures for personal computers, personal computer monitors, cable 
or satellite set-top boxes, and stand-alone digital video recorder 
boxes? Would labeling or other energy disclosures ``assist consumers in 
making purchasing decisions''? Is there any evidence that labeling or 
other energy disclosures for these products would ``not be 
technologically or economically feasible'' or ``not likely to assist 
consumers in making purchasing decisions''?
    b. Are there any other consumer electronic products (i.e., beyond 
those listed above) that the Commission should consider for labeling or 
other energy disclosures? If so, which ones? Would labeling or other 
energy disclosures ``assist consumers in making purchasing decisions''?
    c. What benefits, if any, would labeling or other energy 
disclosures for consumer electronics (i.e., any product identified in 
response to 1.a. or 1.b. immediately above) provide for consumers and 
businesses (including small businesses)? What costs would such labeling 
or other energy disclosures impose on consumers and businesses 
(including small businesses)?
    2. Energy Use Data: Is there data regarding energy use of consumer 
electronic products (i.e., any product identified in response to 1.a. 
or 1.b. above) in the market? If so, is there data that shows a 
significant difference in the energy use of other models? What are

[[Page 11049]]

the annual energy costs of these products?
    3. Reports, Studies, or Research: Do any recent reports, studies, 
or research provide data relevant to potential energy disclosures for 
consumer electronics products in the United States or other 
countries?\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ When statistical or scientific data is presented, the 
Commission requests enough detail about data, study design, 
statistical analysis, and findings to enable it to understand the 
methodology that was used to conduct the analysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    4. Test Procedures: Are there existing adequate test procedures for 
consumer electronic products that could yield annual energy consumption 
estimates? If so, are such test procedures currently used by industry 
or in any government standards program? Would such test procedures be 
appropriate for the Commission to adopt for labeling purposes? Why or 
why not?
    5. Format, Content, and Placement: If the Commission considers 
labeling or other energy disclosures for one or more of these products, 
what should be the format, content, and placement of such information? 
How do consumers purchase these products (e.g., in stores, online, 
etc.)? Should disclosures appear on the products themselves, on 
packaging, through other point of purchase material, or through some 
other means?
    a. Retailer Role: What role, if any, should retailers have in 
providing these disclosures? Should retailers have a responsibility for 
the placement of disclosures in brick and mortar stores? If so, what 
should this responsibility be?
    b. Internet Disclosures: Should the Commission consider energy 
disclosure options that do not provide consumer information at the 
point of purchase in the form of a label or other in-store disclosure 
(e.g., Internet-only disclosures with no labeling on the product or 
product package)? Should such Internet disclosures (and other catalog 
disclosures) be any different than those for other covered products 
under the Rule (such as refrigerators)?
    c. Content: If labeling or other energy disclosures should be 
required, what types of information should be included on such labels? 
Should labeling provide the same information as the EnergyGuide label 
(i.e., yearly operating costs, energy use, and comparative 
information)? Or should the label require something different or 
additional?
    6. Comparative Information: What, if any, disclosures should the 
Rule require about other products on the market? If the Commission 
requires a label, should the label contain a range of comparability 
like other covered products with the EnergyGuide label? If not, why 
not? If so, how should such comparative information be organized? 
Should the comparisons be made across model types and technologies? Is 
there data available from which to develop approximate ranges for 
labeling purposes or should the Commission wait for manufacturers to 
test all their products and submit such data to the Commission?
    7. Reporting Requirements: What data, if any, should the Rule 
require manufacturers to submit to the FTC?

List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 305

    Advertising, Consumer Protection, Energy Conservation, Household 
Appliances, Labeling, Lamp Products, Penalties, Reporting and 
Recordkeeping Requirements.
    By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-5560 Filed 3-13-09: 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-S