alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, James V. Mazzo and Richard A. Meier, the Chief Executive Officer
and the Principal Financial Officer, respectively, of Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certify to the best of their knowledge that:

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 28, 2007 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Dated: November 6, 2007



/s/ James V. MazzoJames V. Mazzo,Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Richard A. MeierRichard A. Meier,Chief Operating Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Advanced
Medical Optics, Inc. and will be retained by Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Texas United Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, L.
Don Stricklin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.

|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2003 |  | /s/ L. Don Stricklin                 
|                      |  |                                      
|                      |  | L. Don Stricklin                     
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
In the MATTER OF: K.L.C.

No. COA18-1003

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 7, 2019

VACATED.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                   ------------------------------------------


     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Betsy Henley-Cohn and John S.
Tomac, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, respectively, of
BIW Limited (the "issuer"), do each hereby certify that the report on Form 10-Q
accompanying this certification (the "report") fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the issuer.




/s/ Betsy Henley-Cohn
--------------------------
Betsy Henley-Cohn
Chairwoman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(chief executive officer)
BIW Limited

November 14, 2005




/s/ John S. Tomac
--------------------------
John S. Tomac
President and Treasurer
(chief financial officer)
BIW Limited

November 14, 2005
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 18, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51000

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

DONALD WAYNE DOWLING,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

No. 7:05-CR-250-1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Donald Dowling has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
No. 06-51000

2

U.S. 738 (1967). Dowling has filed a response. Our independent review of the

record, counsel’s brief, and Dowling’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for

appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
<PAGE>
                                                     Exhibit 23.2





                       ENGINEER'S CONSENT


We  consent  to  incorporation by reference in  the  Registration
Statements (No. 33-32378, No. 33-67924 and No. 333-66873) on Form
S-8  and the Registration Statements (No. 333-00815 and No.  333-
66899)  on Form S-3 of Devon Energy Corporation the reference  to
our  appraisal report for Devon Energy Corporation as of December
31, 1998, which appears in the December 31, 1998 annual report on
Form 10-K of Devon Energy Corporation.





                                  By: Allen K. Ashton
                                      AMH GROUP LTD.


March 29, 1999
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Maximum Dynamics, Inc. a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Eric Majors, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the
best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Maximum Dynamics, Inc., and will be retained by Maximum Dynamics,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.




/s/ Eric Majors
--------------------------
Eric Majors
Chief Executive Officer
August 16, 2004
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SANDRA JIMENEZ-ESQUER, AKA 

Monica Jimenez-Esquer, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 14-70097 

Agency No. A037-801-746 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 24, 2017**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON, 

Circuit Judges.

Sandra Jimenez-Esquer, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying her application for relief under the 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 1 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-70097 

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Silaya v. 

Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for 

review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of Jimenez-Esquer’s CAT 

claim because Jimenez-Esquer failed to establish it is more likely than not she 

would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government of

Mexico. See id. at 1073; Zheng v. Holder, 644 F.3d 829, 835-36 (9th Cir. 2011) 

(claims of possible torture were speculative). We reject her contentions that the 

agency erred in analyzing her claim.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
STATE of North Carolina v. James Kelvin MEDLIN, Defendant.

No. COA18-20

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 21, 2019

NO ERROR IN PART. NO PLAIN ERROR IN PART.
[KPMG Peat Marwick LLP letterhead]

                          Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors
1ST BANCORP:

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statement  (No.
33-60162) on Form S-3 of 1ST BANCORP of our report dated July 17, 1997, relating
to the  consolidated  statements  of  financial  condition  of 1ST  BANCORP  and
subsidiaries  as of  June  30,  1997  and  1996  and  the  related  consolidated
statements  of earnings,  stockholders'  equity,  and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year  period ended June 30, 1997, which report appears in the
June 30, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of 1ST BANCORP.




/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
September 25, 1997
Subsidiaries of Lindsay Corporation
 OwnershipPercentageLindsay Manufacturing, LLC  Nebraska
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay Sales Holding Company, LLC  Nebraska
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay Sales & Service, LLC  Nebraska
    
    
    100
    %Irrigation Specialists, Inc.  Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay International Sales & Service, LLC  Nebraska
    
    
    100
    %Barrier Systems Sales & Service, LLC  Nebraska
    
    
    100
    %Watertronics, LLC  Wisconsin
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay Real Estate Holdings, LLC  Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay Transportation, Inc.  Nebraska
    
    
    100
    %Barrier Systems, Inc.  California
    
    
    100
    %Safe Technologies, Inc.  California
    
    
    100
    %Barrier Systems, LLC  California
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay International Holdings, BV  Netherlands
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay Europe SAS  France
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay Manufacturing Africa Ltd.  South Africa
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay America do Sul Ltda.  Brazil
    
    
    100
    %Snoline S.P.A.  Italy
    
    
    100
    %Flagship Holdings Limited  United Kingdom (Inactive)
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay Foreign Sales Corporation  Virgin Islands (Inactive)
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay  Irrigation Pty., Ltd.  Australia (Inactive)
    
    
    100
    %LMC Professional Supply, Inc.  Delaware (Inactive)
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay International Sales Corporation  Delaware (Inactive)
    
    
    100
    %
 63
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Historic Preservation Properties 1989 LP
("HPP'89") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HPP'89.

/s/ Robert Gunn
---------------------------------------------------
Robert Gunn
Asset Manager
(Performing similar functions of Financial Officer)

Date:  March 9, 2006
STATE of North Carolina v. Raymond JOINER

No. 428P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2019

Mary McCullers Reece, Attorney at Law, Smithfield, for Joiner, Raymond.

James Bernier, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, Raymond Joiner, For Joiner, Raymond, Ted Bell, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th of December 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*164"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."
Amendment 2010-1 to the Corporation and Affiliates Deferred Compensation Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.20 
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. 

AND AFFILIATES DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 
 (as amended and restated effective May 5, 2009) 
 WHEREAS, The PNC Financial Services Group,
Inc. (“PNC”) sponsors The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. And Affiliates Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”); 

WHEREAS, Section 10 of the Plan authorizes PNC to amend the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, PNC wishes to amend the Plan to reflect certain design and other clarifying changes. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED that the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of January 1, 2010 unless otherwise stated herein:

  

	1.	The last sentence of Section 1.15 (“Distribution Date”) is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 


“The Participant may designate January 15 or July 15 as the applicable annual payment date.” 

2.     Effective for awards earned on or after January 1, 2011, the first paragraph of Section 3.1 (“Deferral
Amount”) is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
 “Any Employee who is eligible to participate in
the Plan pursuant to the criteria set forth in Section 2 of the Plan may elect to defer payment of up to 75% of an Eligible Annual Cash Incentive Award by designating either a dollar amount or a percentage of such Eligible Annual Cash Incentive
Award for deferral; provided, however, that (i) the Participant’s gross Deferral Amount may not be less than $5,000 for any single deferral; and (ii) if the participant designates a dollar amount for deferral and 75% of his Annual
Cash Incentive Award is less than such amount, then his deferral will be equal to 75% of the Annual Cash Incentive Award (if such amount is at least $5000). If a percentage election (or deemed election under (iii) above) would produce a
Deferral Amount of less than $5000, no deferral shall be made.” 
  

	3.	Section 4.1 (“Time of Distribution”) is amended to add the following new sentence to the end thereof: 


“For purposes of this Section 4.1, distributions of a Participant’s Account shall be valued as of the first business day of
the month containing the Distribution Date.” 







 Executed and adopted by the Chief Human Resources Officer of The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. this
23rd day of December, 2010 pursuant to the authority delegated by the Corporation’s Personnel and Compensation Committee. 
  

			
	
	/s/ Joan L. Gulley
	Joan L. Gulley
	Chief Human Resources Officer
CHARLESTON.

#### J. W. Travis Etc. *v.*The E. M. Wichert Company.

Submitted September 18, 1923.

Decided October 2, 1923.

Service on Corporations by Publication.

This case is in all respects governed by the principles announced in an opinion this day filed in the case of *Talley Camp Coal Company*v. *The E. M. Wichert Company.*

Certified from Circuit Court, Marshall County.

*504Suit by J. W. Travis and others against the E. M. Wichert Company and others. An order overruling a motion to quash an order of publication was entered, and questions certified.

*Affirmed.*

*Chas. A. Showacre*and *James D. Parriott,*for plaintiffs.

*James T. Miller,*for defendants.

Meredith, Judge:

This is a suit in equity to recover the sum of $402.94, brought under section 1, chapter 106, Code. An attachment was issued and levied on defendant’s property. An order of publication was issued on plaintiff filing an affidavit stating “that the defendant The E. M. Wichert Co., Pittsburgh, Pa., a corporation, is a foreign corporation and is a non-resident of the 'State of West Virginia.” The order was properly published and posted. Defendant appeared specially and moved to quash the order of publication because the affidavit does not show that no person could be found in the county upon whom the process could legally be served. The court overruled the motion, and the questions arising thereon were certified.

The affidavit in this case is in all respects similar to the affidavit in the case of Valley Camp s Coal Co. v. The E. M. Wichert Co.; there we held the affidavit sufficient for reasons stated in an opinion this day filed.

• For like reasons, we affirm the ruling of the circuit court in this case, and it will be so certified.

*Ruling affirmed.*
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(A)

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE PRESIDENT RELATING TO A
                PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     I, Leonard A. Cullo, Jr., Director and President of H. J. Heinz Finance
Company, a Delaware corporation ("Heinz Finance"), hereby certify that, to my
knowledge:

     1. Heinz Finance's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
        October 29, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
        amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        Heinz Finance.

Date: December 8, 2003

                                          By: /s/ LEONARD A. CULLO, JR.
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name: Leonard A. Cullo, Jr.
                                            Title:  Director and President
EXHIBIT
      32.1




***CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO***


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Magnitude Information Systems, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 and Amendment
      No.
      1 thereto (collectively, the "Form 10-KSB"), I, Edward Marney, Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify, as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the best of my **** knowledge,
      that the Company's Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in the Form 10-KSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
                August 7, 2007
            
            /s/
                Edward MarneyEdward
                MarneyPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bryan Edward GRAY, Appellant.

WD 80629

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: April 24, 2018

Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Julia E. Neidhardt, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Nancy A. McKerrow, Columbia, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Before Division Two: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, and Alok Ahuja and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judges

**Order**

Per Curiam:

Bryan Gray appeals, following a jury trial, his convictions of two counts of first-degree statutory sodomy (§ 566.062) and one count of first-degree child molestation (§ 566.067), for which he was sentenced, as a prior offender, to concurrent terms of eighteen, eighteen, and ten years' imprisonment, respectively. Gray raises a single claim on appeal; he argues that the trial court plainly erred in failing to *sua sponte* intervene in closing argument to prevent the State from personally attacking defense counsel. But because the State's arguments, which addressed Victim's credibility in the face of defense counsel's aggressive tactics, were permissible, the trial court committed no error, plain or otherwise, and we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
**Exhibit 32**

 

**WrittenStatement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant toSection 906**

**of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

 

The undersigned, the ChiefExecutive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Regal Entertainment Group,a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), each hereby certifies that, to his/herknowledge on the date hereof:

 

(a)                                  the Form 10-Qof the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2006, filed on the datehereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)                                 the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 
|   | /s/ Michael L. Campbell |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Michael L. Campbell     |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | May 9, 2006             |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/ Amy E. Miles        |
|   | Amy E. Miles            |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | May 9, 2006             |

 

----
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Larry ALVERSON, Defendant.

ED 105101

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: February 27, 2018

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.

Samuel Buffaloe, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, for Defendant.

Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Larry Alverson appeals from the trial court's judgment, following a jury trial, convicting him of one count of burglary in the first degree in violation of Section 569.160 RSMo (2000), four counts of sodomy in the first degree in violation of Section 566.060 RSMo (2014), and five counts of armed criminal action in violation of Section 571.015 RSMo (2000). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
No. 09-9906.

#### Mitchell Lavern Ludy, Petitioner v. William Terry, Warden.

560 U.S. 913, 130 S. Ct. 3309,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1199,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3890.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
#### Amelia Brunson, *Appellant,*v. Arie Glover, Joined by her Husband, H. Glover, and Idella *King*Hall, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision Filed March 17, 1928.

*Peterson*cfe *Carver,*for Appellant;

*John 8. Edwards,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of .the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, *521ordered and adjudged by tbe Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.