SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549



FORM 20-F

(Mark One)

o

REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



OR



x

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.



OR



o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



OR



o

SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report



For the transition period from  to .



Commission File Number:

0-17212



QSOUND LABS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Alberta, Canada

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)



#400, 3115  12th Street N.E.

Calgary, Alberta

T2E 7J2

CANADA

Tel (403) 291-2492

Fax (403) 250-1521

(Address of principal executive offices)



Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



Title of each class

Common Shares

Name of each exchange on which registered

The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC



Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:



Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:



Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer's classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:  Common Shares at December 31, 2006:   9,375,585



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-know seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    o Yes  x No



If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.      oYes   xNo



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   x Yes   o No



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer.

Large Accelerated filer  o

Accelerated filer  o

Non-accelerated filer x



Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elect to follow.   Item 17 x    Item 18 o



If this is an annual report, indicate by the check mark whether the registrant is a shell company.       oYes   xNo







1





---





TABLE OF CONTENTS





PART I

4

ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS

4

A. Directors and Senior Management

4

B. Advisors

4

C. Auditors

4

ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

4

A. Offer Statistics

4

B. Method and Expected Timetable

4

ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION

4

A.  Selected Financial Data

4

B.  Capitalization and Indebtedness

6

C.  Reasons For the Offer and Use of Proceeds

6

D.  Risk Factors

6

ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

10

A.  History and Development of the Company

10

B.  Business Overview

10

C.  Organizational Structure

15

D.  Property, Plants and Equipment

15

ITEM 4A.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

16

ITEM 5.  OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

16

A.  Operating Results

17

B.  Liquidity and Capital Resources

21

C.  Research and Development

21

D.  Trends

22

E.  Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

23

F.  Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

23

G.  Safe Harbour

23

ITEM 6.  DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

23

A.  Directors and Senior Management

24

B.  Compensation

25

C.  Board Practices

25

D. Employees

26

E.  Share Ownership

26

ITEM 7.  MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

28

A.  Major Shareholders

28

B.  Related Party Transactions

28

C.  Interests of Experts and Counsel

28

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

28

A.  Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information

28

B.  Significant Changes

29

ITEM 9.  THE OFFER AND LISTING

29

A. Offer and Listing Details

29

B.  Plan of Distribution

29

C.  Markets

30

D.  Selling Shareholders

30

E.  Expenses of the Issue

30

ITEM 10.  ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

30

A.  Share Capital

30

B.  Memorandum and Articles of Association

30

C.  Material Contracts

31

D.  Exchange Controls

31

E.  Taxation

32

F.  Dividends and Paying Agents

37

G.  Statements by Experts

37

H.  Documents on display

37



2





---

I.  Subsidiary Information

38

ITEM 11.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

38

ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

38

PART II

38

ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

38

ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS

38

ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

39

ITEM 16. [RESERVED]

39

ITEM 16A.  Audit Committee Financial Expert

39

ITEM 16B.  Code of Ethics

39

ITEM 16C.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services

39

ITEM 16D.  Exemptions from Listing Standards for Audit Committees

39

ITEM 16E.  Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

39

PART III

39

ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

39

ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

40

ITEM 19. EXHIBITS

40

SIGNATURE

41

Consolidated Financial Statements

43











Note:  All references to dollar amounts in this Annual Report are stated in United States Dollars under Canadian GAAP unless otherwise stated.



The terms QSound, our company, the Company, we, us and our as used in this Annual Report on Form 20-F (this Annual Report) refer to QSound Labs, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including QSound Ltd., QCommerce Inc. and QTelNet Inc., as a combined entity, except where the context requires otherwise.







CAUTIONARY NOTICE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS



This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, reflecting management's current expectations. These statements relate to our future plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. We use words such as  may, expect, anticipate, project, believe, plan, intend, future and other similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements.  These forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could contribute to differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Item 3.D, entitled Risk Factors, and elsewhere in this Annual Report.







3





---



PART I



ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS



A. Directors and Senior Management



Not Applicable.



B. Advisors



Not Applicable.



C. Auditors



Not Applicable.



ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE



A. Offer Statistics



Not Applicable.



B. Method and Expected Timetable



Not Applicable.



ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION



A.  Selected Financial Data



The selected financial data presented below for the five years ended December 31, 2006 is derived from QSounds consolidated financial statements that were examined by the Companys independent auditors. The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of QSound (including notes thereto) included under item 17 and Operating and Financial Review and Prospects included under item 5. The selected financial data presented below is presented in United States dollars and in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (Canadian GAAP).





|                                                          |                |                |               |              |              | 
|--------------------------------------------------------- | -------------- | -------------- | ------------- | ------------ | ------------ | 
|Selected Financial Data                                  
|Years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002
|Under Canadian GAAP in United States Dollars             
|                                                          | 2006           | 2005           | 2004          | 2003         | 2002        
|                                                          |                |                |               |              |             
|Revenue                                                   | $    1,989,030 | $    1,543,240 | $   2,213,178 | $  2,043,088 | $  4,224,311
|Gross Margin                                              | 1,948,942      | 1,363,459      | 1,793,888     | 1,617,997    | 3,952,781   
|Expenses                                                  | 3,609,947      | 3,932,993      | 3,758,744     | 3,044,454    | 2,663,235   
|                                                          |                |                |               |              |             
|Operating (loss) profit                                   | (1,661,005)    | (2,569,534)    | (1,964,856)   | (1,426,457)  | 1,289,546   
|                                                          |                |                |               |              |             
|Other items                                               | (22,370)       | (56,537)       | 61,414        | (2,270,631)  | (140,853)   
|                                                          |                |                |               |              |             
|Loss before taxes                                         | (1,683,375)    | (2,512,997)    | (1,903,442)   | (3,697,088)  | 1,148,693   
|Foreign withholding tax                                   | (50,849)       | (37,711)       | (22,504)      | (8,543)      | (19,741)    
|                                                          |                |                |               |              |             
|Net (loss) income for the year                            | (1,734,224))   | (2,550,708)    | (1,925,946)   | (3,705,631)  | 1,128,952   
|Deficit, beginning                                        |                |                |               |              |              | 



4







---

|                                                     |                 |                |               |               |               | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | --------------- | -------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | 
|of year                                              | (46,252,276)    | (43,701,568)   | (41,775,622)  | (38,069,991)  | (39,198,943) 
|                                                     |                 |                |               |               |              
|Deficit, end of year                                 | $(47,986,500)   | $(46,252,276)  | $(43,701,568) | $(41,775,622) | $(38,069,991)
|                                                     |                 |                |               |               |              
|Income (loss) per common share, basic                | $  (0.19)       | $  (0.30)      | $  (0.25)     | $  (0.52)     | $  0.16      
|Income (loss) per common share, diluted              | $  (0.19)       | $  (0.30)      | $   (0.25)    | $  (0.52)     | $  0.15      
|                                                     |                 |                |               |               |              
|Total assets                                         | $    3,534,885  | $    3,002,315 | $  5,227,834  | $ 3,776,579   | $  7,271,766 
|                                                     |                 |                |               |               |              
|Net assets                                           | $    2,831,012  | $    2,671,518 | $  4,922,425  | $   3,446,834 | $  6,930,361 
|                                                     |                 |                |               |               |              
|Capital Stock                                        | $    47,208,942 | $   45,979,055 | $  45,792,526 | $  44,108,140 | $  43,886,036
|                                                     |                 |                |               |               |              
|Shareholders equity                                 | $  2,831,012    | $  2,671,518   | $  4,922,425  | $ 3,446,834   | $ 6,930,361  
|Share capital  common shares issued and outstanding | 9,375,585       | 8,661,985      | 8,404,085     | 7,199,244     | 7,156,074    



No dividends have been declared or paid for any of the periods presented.



Net loss, shareholders equity and other balance sheet amounts as determined in accordance with Canadian GAAP differ from those determined in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP), due principally to the recording of compensation expense for stock options prior to January 1, 2003, the recording of deferred development costs as an expense rather than capitalized and the recording of a beneficial conversion feature of the convertible notes rather than bifurcating the liability and conversion option. See Note 17 to the December 31, 2006 consolidated financial statements included under Item 17.





|                                         |                  |                |                |                |             
|---------------------------------------- | ---------------- | -------------- | -------------- | -------------- | ------------
|Under U.S. GAAP in United States Dollars
|                                         | 2006             | 2005           | 2004           | 2003           | 2002        
|                                         |                  |                |                |                |             
|Net (loss) income for the year           | $    (1,681,675) | $  (2,631,579) | $  (1,925,946) | $  (3,705,631) | $  1,128,952
|                                         |                  |                |                |                |             
|Income (loss) per common share, basic    | $  (0.20)        | $  (0.31)      | $  (0.25)      | $  (0.52)      | $  0.16     
|Income (loss) per common share, diluted  | $  (0.20)        | $  (0.31)      | $   (0.25)     | $  (0.52)      | $  0.15     
|                                         |                  |                |                |                |             
|Total assets                             | $    3,474,232   | $    2,921,444 | $  5,227,834   | $ 3,776,579    | $  7,271,766
|                                         |                  |                |                |                |             
|Shareholders equity                     | $  3,075,272     | $  2,590,647   | $  4,922,425   | $  3,446,834   | $  6,930,361





At March 1, 2007 the exchange rate was U.S. $0.856 per CDN. $1.00.



The high and low exchange rates for each month during the previous six months ended February 28, 2007, and the average rates (average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the year) for Canadian dollars for each



5





---

of the years in the five year period ended December 31, 2006 based on the closing rates of the Bank of Canada and expressed in U.S. dollars were as follows:





Month



High                 Low



February 2007

0.8647              0.8419

January 2007

0.8576              0.8440

December 2006

0.8746              0.8569

November 2006

0.8846              0.8699

October 2006

0.8937              0.8760

September 2006

0.9034              0.8858





Average



2006 Year                                   0.8820

2005 Year                                   0.8259

2004 Year                                   0.7698

2003 Year                                   0.7135

2002 Year                                   0.6368



B.  Capitalization and Indebtedness



Not Applicable



C.  Reasons For the Offer and Use of Proceeds



Not Applicable



D.  Risk Factors



The following is a summary of certain risks and uncertainties which we face in our business. These risk factors should be read in conjunction with other cautionary statements which we make in this Annual Report and in our other public reports, registration statements and public announcements. If any of he following risks actually occur, our business, results of operations and financial condition could suffer significantly.



We were not profitable in 2006 or in 2005 in any of our business segments.  The IP telephony and e-commerce business units have never been profitable. Except for 2002, we have been only marginally profitable in previous years, and we have had to rely on the sale of our common shares, and in the past on debt financing, to fund our business operations.



With the exception of 2002, we have a history of losses and we have had to fund our operations through a combination of equity and debt financings.  In 2006 we had revenues of $1,989,030 and operating expenses of $3,650,035, including cost of products sold of $40,088. The net loss for 2006 was $1,734,224. In 2005 we had revenues of $1,543,240 and operating expenses of $4,112,774, including cost of products sold of $179,781.  The net loss for the year was $2,550,708.  If we are not successful in enhancing revenues through increased sales of our products and technologies or the development and marketing of additional products, or if there is a material increase in our expenses, we may be unable to achieve profitability in the future. As a result, we may have to rely on the sale of shares and on debt financings in the future to fund our operations.  If we are unable to raise financing when and in the amount required, we may be required to cease operations.



Most of our audio industry revenues come from a limited number of accounts and a significant change in the performance or a loss of these accounts would have a material effect on our revenues.



The sources of our audio industry revenues are limited in number and a reduction in the performance, or expiration or termination, of any of these accounts, would have a material effect on our revenues and consequently, the companys financial condition.  In the event that we lose one or more of these accounts, our results of operation would suffer materially.





6





---

Our audio revenues depend primarily on license fees and recurring royalties generated upon the sale of devices that incorporate our technology.  As a result, we are highly dependent upon the sales efforts of the manufacturers of these products and market acceptance of their product offering.



Our primary business in the audio business revolves around entering into license agreements with semiconductor and handset manufacturers who wish to incorporate our microQ audio engine technology into their products.  Under most of these agreements, we generate revenue based on the number of units incorporating our microQ audio engine produced by each manufacturer.    Factors that contribute to performance of these products include, among others:



·

end-user demand;

·

timeliness, quality and pricing;

·

success or failure of distribution and commercialization efforts;

·

competition from similar or substitute products;

·

manufacturing uncertainties; and

·

general or regional economic conditions.



If these products do not meet the currently anticipated timeline or if these products are not widely accepted by consumers, our revenue stream may be delayed or may not materialize at all.  As a consequence of the effect that these and similar factors may have on our licensees, customers and partners, we may from time to time experience significant fluctuations in our revenues.



To succeed in the audio industry we must be able to identify emerging technological and market trends, to enhance our existing technologies and develop new technologies, and to achieve and maintain wide distribution.



The audio industry is characterized by a number of factors including:



·

rapid technological changes;

·

short technology and product life cycles;

·

escalating pressure to provide improved audio solutions at increasingly lower prices;

·

frequent introduction of new technologies and products; and

·

development of audio enhancement technologies in-house by potential customers.



It is important for us to be able to identify emerging trends in the mobile devices, consumer electronics, PC multimedia and Internet audio environments, and to enhance our existing technologies and develop new technologies and products to meet these continually changing market requirements. The development of our products and technologies must continue to focus on technological superiority over the offerings of our competitors while meeting the needs of our customers and potential customers, including competitive pricing and expeditious completion of development. Additionally, there must be sufficient consumer interest in and demand for enhanced audio to motivate our customers to use our products and technologies in their offerings. If we do not continue to develop premium new technologies and products timely and cost effectively, we will not be able to achieve profitability in the audio industry.



Due to the rapid technological development in our field and changing regulatory and industry standards, our IP telephony technologies may become obsolete quickly.



The IP telephony industry is characterized by rapid technological advances, evolving industry standards and frequent new product introductions. Unless we continue development and improvement of our technologies to respond to advances in technology and changes in the regulatory landscape, our products may not be accepted by consumers or industry regulators. To keep pace with industry changes, we must continue to incur research and development costs which may not be offset by new and existing revenue streams.





7





---

Our products incorporate technologies licensed from a number of third parties.  If we are unable to maintain these licenses on favorable terms or we are unable to effectively integrate these technologies, our revenues will suffer.



Our products incorporate a number of technologies licensed from third parties.  If we are unable to maintain our relationships with these third parties on favorable terms or if we are unable to successfully integrate these technologies into our product line, we may need to revise our products, including by limiting product features or locating substitute technologies.  Any modifications of our products would be costly and divert research and development efforts.  As a result, our business and results of operations would suffer.



If we fail to obtain product standard certification in particular countries we will be unable to sell our IP telephony products in such countries.  Any such limitations would adversely impact our revenues and business prospects.



Our IP telephony products must meet certain safety and radio-frequency emission standards. Products that connect to the telephone network must also meet certain standards aimed at protecting the network. Virtually all countries have developed their own sets of standards, which are not uniform. If we do not obtain certifications attesting that our products comply with the standards of the country where our equipment will be used, we will be unable to export our products to that country. Any such failure would adversely impact our revenues and business prospects.



Telecommunications failures, computer viruses, breaches of security or terrorist attacks could disrupt our IP telephony and e-commerce businesses by reducing consumer confidence in the Internet as a means of communication and commerce.



Internet communications are susceptible to interruptions resulting from factors including telecommunications failures, computer viruses, capacity limitations, breaches of security, terrorist attacks and vandalism.  If one or a combination of these events causes consumers to lose confidence in the Internet as a means for communication or commerce, the growth of use of the Internet and reliance upon the Internet as an alternative to the telephone network would be negatively impacted.  Any shift of consumers away from the Internet would adversely impact sales of our IP telephony and e-commerce products.



Our e-commerce revenues have declined in the past few years and we do not expect growth in this business.



Our e-commerce revenues have declined in the past few years. Consolidation has become the principal method for acquiring new merchants, and we do not expect organic growth in our merchant base nor do we anticipate adding merchants through acquisition of competitors. Larger service providers may offer their products and services at reduced prices and we may have to adjust our prices accordingly. As new technologies are developed and introduced, our e-commerce products may become less attractive to small business merchants.



Many of our competitors have greater resources available to them.  If we fail to compete effectively with our competitors, our results of operation and viability will be negatively impacted.



The audio, IP telephony and electronic commerce industries are intensely competitive.  We have competitors in these industries who have technologies and products that are similar to ours and compete directly with us.  Many of these competitors are large, established companies with significantly greater resources than we have. If we are unable to develop and commercialize products that consumers view as superior to those of our competitors in terms of leading edge technology, performance, features, functions or price, among other elements, our results of operation will suffer.



Our products and technologies are based on our intellectual property. If we fail to adequately protect our intellectual property our business will suffer, and if we are sued for infringement by a third party we will incur significant legal expenses and may be required to pay substantial fees and/or cease using any such intellectual property.



Our success depends largely on our ability to protect our proprietary technologies and to keep infringers from using and marketing our technologies. We rely upon U.S. and international patent, copyright, trade secret and trademark laws to protect our intellectual property. We also rely on contractual obligations such as non-disclosure agreements. Third parties may copy our technologies and we may be unable to prevent the sale of infringing products. Also, third parties may successfully develop products which compete with our products and which do not infringe our intellectual property rights. In addition, third parties may successfully assert that our technologies and products infringe their products and that our patents are invalid. Our business will suffer if we are not successful in defending our intellectual property, and we will incur significant legal expenses if we must defend third party infringement claims.  In addition, we may be ordered to pay substantial penalties and/or cease using certain intellectual property if we are found to have infringed on the intellectual property rights of a third party.





8





---

New equity financing would dilute current shareholders.



If we raise funds through future equity financing, it will have a dilutive effect on existing holders of our shares by reducing their percentage ownership. The shares may be sold at a time when the market price is low because we need the funds. This will dilute existing holders more than if our stock price were higher. In addition, private equity financings normally involve shares sold at a discount to the current public market price.  Our articles of incorporation allow us to issue an unlimited number of common and preferred stock.  Therefore, there is no theoretical cap on the amount of dilution our investors may suffer in subsequent financings.



The market price of our common shares has been and continues to be volatile.



The trading price of our common shares on the NASDAQ Capital Market has been and continues to be volatile. During the twelve months ending on March 5, 2007 our stock price has ranged from a high of $6.09 to a low of $3.58. The market price may be affected by announcements of, among other things:



·

new products by our competitors;



·

fluctuations in our operating results;



·

assertions of intellectual property infringement made by us against third parties or by third parties against us; and



·

changes in our financial position.



In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been subject to securities class action litigation. A securities class action lawsuit against us, regardless of its merit, could result in substantial costs and divert the attention of our management from other business concerns, which in turn could have a materially adverse impact on our financial results.



If we experience rapid growth and do not manage it effectively our business and financial results will suffer.



If our technologies and products achieve wide acceptance we may experience rapid growth. We may have to hire more employees including additional management, improve our financial and control systems, and expand and manage our technical, sales and support services operations. We would need increased revenues and/or additional funding to operate these increased activities. If we do not manage our growth effectively our business and financial results will suffer.



We depend on key employees and our business may suffer if we are not able to keep these employees or hire and train replacements.



Our success depends on the skills, experience and performance of our senior management and certain other key personnel. We do not carry key personnel insurance on these employees. Experienced management and highly skilled engineers and software programmers are critical to the success of our business and are in high demand. We would suffer adverse effects if we are unable to successfully retain our key personnel, or hire and train suitable replacements.



Some of our directors and officers may in the future have potential conflicts of interest between their positions with QSound and their positions as executives or directors of companies that are in the same industries in which we engage.



Some of our officers and directors may in the future have conflicts of interest due to involvement as shareholders, officers, directors or partners of businesses that are engaged in the audio technology, IP telephony or e-commerce industries. These conflicts could include time and effort devoted to QSound, competition for customers and suppliers and interest in material contracts.  Although our by-laws and our corporate legislation require disclosure of conflicts of interest, and our code of ethics prohibits such conflicts, should a conflict arise our business could be adversely affected.



We are incorporated in Alberta, Canada, some of our directors and officers live in Canada, and most of our assets are in Canada, and investors may have difficulty initiating legal claims and enforcing judgments against us and our directors and officers.



We are incorporated in the Province of Alberta, Canada. Certain of our directors and officers live in Canada, and most of our assets, and the assets of those officers and directors, are located in Canada. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of legal process within the United States upon directors and officers who are not United States residents. Also, there is



9





---

uncertainty as to the enforceability in Canada, in original actions or for enforcement of judgments of U.S. courts, of civil liabilities predicated upon U.S. federal or state securities laws.



ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY



A.  History and Development of the Company



QSound Labs, Inc. was reincorporated on July 10, 1990 in the province of Alberta, Canada under the Business Corporations Act of Alberta, by way of continuance from the province of British Columbia where QSound was originally incorporated on December 6, 1968.  The address of our registered office is Suite 400  3115 12th Street NE, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2E 7J2 and the telephone number is (403) 291-2492.



Since 1988 QSound's main focus is development, licensing and distribution of audio enhancement algorithms and software to semiconductor/component and OEM licensees in the mobile devices, consumer electronics and personal computer industries.  In 2006 we added eight licensees for microQTM, our audio software engine for portable applications, in the growing mobile and handheld devices market, and six consumer electronics and PC licensees for audio enhancement.  Since 2003 we sell Internet telephony technology products through our subsidiary QTelNet Inc.  Since 1999 our subsidiary QCommerce Inc. provides e-commerce enabling services to small business merchants.



Capital Expenditures



Our principal capital expenditures for each of fiscal year 2006, 2005, and 2004 are detailed in the table below:



|                                   |             |            |             
|---------------------------------- | ----------- | ---------- | ------------
|                                   | 2006        | 2005       | 2004        
|Sound source and control equipment | $     2,895 | $         | $      1,320
|Furniture and fixtures             | 185         | 2,014      | 5,092       
|Computer equipment                 | 39,346      | 98,481     | 103,468     
|Software and production tooling    |            | 88,393     | 54,576      
|Deferred development costs         | 39,500      | 352,750    |            
|Patents and trademarks             |            | 50,977     | 46,233      
|Licensing rights                   |            |           | 428,453     
|Total                              | $  81,926   | $  592,615 | $  639,142  



We had no divestitures in either fiscal 2006 or 2005.  In fiscal 2004 our divestitures consisted of sound source and control equipment, furniture and fixtures, and computer equipment with a combined net book value of $20,045.



B.  Business Overview



QSound was engaged in three business segments in 2006:



a) Audio Business Segment  Since its inception in 1988 QSound has established itself as one of the worlds leading audio technology companies, and we derive most of our revenues from this business segment.  QSound develops, markets and distributes multimedia software solutions and licenses algorithms based on our patented, proprietary audio technology portfolio. Our strategy is to focus on new products and technologies targeted for high-growth markets where the technical barriers to entry are high, and where we can lever our audio technology expertise to penetrate the market. We generate revenues by licensing to original equipment manufacturers and chip manufacturers in the mobile and handheld devices, consumer electronics, and computer multimedia markets, through sales of QSound-enabled analog chips to consumer electronics manufacturers, and by selling downloadable software products for Internet streaming audio, primarily through third parties and also directly, to consumers over the Internet.



b) Internet Telephony Business Segment  Our wholly owned Alberta subsidiary QTelNet Inc. has developed and sells Internet telephony products under the brand-name FreeRideTM.  We target the small to medium sized business and enterprise branch office market, offering Freeride products that enable these businesses to eliminate long distance charges between offices and to expand existing switchboards to encompass remote teleworkers or offices. QTelNet plans to develop new VoIP applications.



c) E-commerce Business Segment Our wholly owned Washington subsidiary QCommerce Inc. provides electronic commerce services that enable electronic commerce for small businesses. QCommerce provides our existing client base of  Web merchants with all of the tools necessary to set up and operate an on-line store, and with marketing and advertising services to drive targeted traffic to the store.





10





---

Audio Business Segment



QSound is a world leader in the development, marketing and distribution of audio enhancement and audio synthesis technologies, and audio engines. The QSOUND®portfolio of proprietary technologies includes a complete suite of virtual audio, reverberation, synthesis and enhancement algorithms as well as all of the components required to create custom software audio engines, namely, a music synthesiser, a digital audio playback engine, a sample rate converter and a mixer.



QSOUND technologies are currently shipped in:



·

mobile phones & PDAs

·

DVD players

·

home theatre systems, TVs and VCRs

·

stereo systems

·

amplified and USB speakers

·

PCs and PC peripherals including sound cards, speakers and monitors

·

video games



QSOUND Portfolio of Technologies



Our technological efforts concentrate on the development and upgrading of a complete suite of proprietary technologies to cover all aspects of enhanced audio and audio synthesis requirements in the mobile devices, multimedia computer and consumer electronics industries.   The QSOUND portfolio consists of:



·

Software Engines



microQTM:  microQ is a modular and scalable software digital audio engine providing functions such as polyphonic ringtones, game sound, music playback, digital effects and recording for portable and embedded applications in the growing hand-held and mobile devices markets.  microQ offers a highly flexible modular architecture, a small memory footprint and support for industry standard (linear and compressed) content formats.  microQ's core components consist of a digital audio playback engine, a wavetable synthesis engine with a scalable sample set, a multi-channel stereo mixer and a sample rate convertor.



QVETM:   The QSound Virtual Engine (“QVE”) is a scalable software audio engine for PCs, soundboards and other digital devices. QVE provides synthesis and digital audio playback for entertainment audio applications, and is a platform for incorporating all of the proprietary algorithms described below.





QMixerTM:  QMixer is a high-performance audio mixer targeted at game developers. QMixer adds 3D speaker or headphone audio to regular stereo sound cards and also takes advantage of available DirectSound®3D and EAX®-compatible acceleration hardware. QMixer uses low CPU overhead and includes advanced resource management to dynamically distribute the rendering duties between hardware and software.



·

3D Audio Algorithms



Q3DTM:  Q3D 2.0 is our interactive sound positioning technology, which places multiple individual sounds in specific locations outside of the bounds of stereo speakers and headphones, and positions sound with equal effectiveness via multiple speaker systems.  Q3D 2.0 also includes QSound Environmental Modeling® (QEMTM), a reverberation engine which is compatible with the EAX (Environmental Audio Extensions® ) API from Creative Labs, Inc.



QSURROUND®:  QSURROUND creates virtual surround sound for audio played back over two speaker and headphone entertainment systems.  QSURROUND has been developed by QSound to take advantage of the DVD format and the digital broadcast format, both of which have become standards for music, video game and movie playback. Using QSURROUND, decoded Dolby Digital, Dolby ProLogic® and MPEG2 multi-channel audio streams can be played back over only two speakers, while maintaining the illusion of a multi-speaker system through creation of phantom or virtual speakers or headphones, eliminating the need for additional speakers. Dolby Digital and MPEG2 are the current audio standards for DVD-based personal computers and home entertainment systems. QSURROUND has been certified by Dolby Laboratories for use with Dolby Digital and ProLogic.



QXPANDER®:  QXPANDER processes existing pre-mixed stereo material to provide 3D enhancement for audio played back over traditional two speaker or headphone stereo.



11





---



QMDVTM:  QSOUND Matrix Surround Decoder/Virtualizer (“QMDV”), a superset of QXPANDER, decodes stereo audio material which has been encoded using matrix surround encoding such as Dolby Surround, and virtualizes the decoded material to create a multiple speaker surround effect when the material is played back over stereo speakers.  For three speaker systems, a centre channel output is available.



·

Synthesis Algorithms



QSURROUND 5.1/QMSSTM:   QSURROUND 5.1 and QSOUND Multiple Speaker System (“QMSS”) process stereo audio material including regular stereo content and decoded surround content downmixed to two channels from sources such as Dolby Surround®, Dolby Digital (AC3), DTS® and MPEG2 and steer acoustic images to create a distinctly different output for each speaker in multiple-speaker systems.



QIMMERSIONTM:  QIMMERSION is a superset of QMSS (four-channel) optimized for playback over a combination of stereo speakers and headphones.



QSIZZLETM:   QSIZZLE is a virtual, adjustable treble feature that allows the listener to adjust the treble level.



QRUMBLETM:   QRUMBLE is a virtual, fully adjustable bass boost that creates dynamic bass effects set to the listener's preference.



Licensing



Our primary business model consists of licensing QSOUND technologies to:



·

semiconductor/component companies which manufacture and sell QSOUND enhanced chips to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs);



·

OEMs for specific products; and



·

semiconductor/component companies that include QSOUND as an option for the OEM, who can then, at their choosing, license the technology directly from the company.



Licenses are negotiated on an individual basis.  Some of our license agreements provide for per-unit payments and others are on a fixed periodic payment or lump sum payment basis, and in some cases licensees pay engineering fees. Most agreements do not have volume requirements and generally may be terminated by the licensee or by QSound without a prescribed financial penalty.



At the early stages of market adoption, licenses with OEMs are feasible and desirable since they provide early endorsement of new technology. As markets mature and OEM product margins decrease, there is less opportunity for direct OEM licensing, since the OEMs are now dependant upon the semiconductor companies to provide them with a cost effective fully featured solution.  Semiconductor licenses typically have smaller royalties per unit but can provide potentially much bigger volumes. The mobile and handheld device market is still at an early stage with respect to audio technologies, whereas the PC and DVD markets are at a mature stage.



In 2006 we negotiated and completed license agreements with fourteensemiconductor/component companies and OEMs. Eight of these licenses were for use of microQ in the mobile and handheld devices market, including with semiconductor manufacturers HiSilicon Technologies, Toshiba and Telechips.  We also entered into a strategic collaboration agreement with ARM Limited to provide highly optimized audio software solutions for mobile phone ringtone, music and gaming markets across the ARM CPU architecture family.  In addition, we added mobile software solutions providers Trolltech, Inc., and, in January 2007 ACCESS Systems Americas, Inc., to our partner roster.  Under previous licenses microQ has been incorporated in handheld and mobile devices from manufacturers including BenQ Corporation, Cellon Communications Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., Eten Information Systems Co., Ltd., Mitac International Corporation, Shanghai Lenovo Electronic Co., Ltd., UTStarcom Inc., Wistron Neweb Corporation, Yuhua Teltech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. and ZTE Corporation, and in reference design platforms from Aplix Corporation, Aricent (formerly Emuzed, A Flextronics Company), ATI Technologies, Inc., Broadcom Corporation, CEVA Inc., DSP Group Ltd., Intel Corporation, LSI Logic Corporation, Pulsus Technologies Inc., Qualcomm Incorporated, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Tensilica Inc., and Winbond Electronics Corp.  microQ-enabled mobile phones in the marketplace include models by BenQ, Curitel, Eten, i-Mobile, LG, Lenovo, Mitac, Panasonic, Philips, Samsung, UTStarcom and ZTE.



In 2006 we also completed agreements with four licensees for audio enhancement in the consumer electronics market and two licensees for PC audio enhancement. ST Microelectronics, one of the worlds largest semiconductor manufacturer and a global



12





---

leader in consumer ICs, will incorporate QSounds audio enhancement into its Sound Terminal ICs for use in flat-panel TVs, active speakers and home-theatre-in a-box systems. Our audio enhancement technologies are incorporated in DVDs, TVs and home-theatre-in a-box systems from, among others, RCA, Sanyo, Sharp, Taiyo and Toshiba, and in the PC multimedia market, in audio controllers and audio codecs from Via Technologies, Inc., in Sony Vaio PC products and in soundcards from Philips.  Philips also bundles the Philips SoundAgent2 soft audio engine based on QSounds QVE technology with USB speakers and mini-component stereo systems.  During the first quarter of 2006, we completed our first license for our new IP voice chat/conferencing software solution, for which we received a lump sum payment from a major video game manufacturer.



Downloadable Software Products



QSound has several standalone software products as well as plug-in products for most media players and certain authoring tools. The majority of our software product revenues are derived from distribution of our iQfx family by RealNetworks, Inc., a leader in media delivery on the Internet. The iQfx family enhances playback of content over all of RealNetworks' media players. Our third generation iQfx3 plug-in is made exclusively for RealNetworks' RealOne Player®.



QMAX® II is our universal stand-alone Internet streaming audio effects software, and works with any sound source, including Windows Media Playerand RealPlayer.  QMAX II intercepts the audio player output and applies realtime processing to optimize speaker and headphone audio. We have also developed and distribute custom plug-ins iQms2 plug-in for Windows Media Player 11 Series for Windows XP. We distribute our downloadable consumer software from our Web site www.qsound.com.



Other



We also purchase and resell QSOUND enhanced analog chips to OEMs. This is a small part of our business. Our analog chip manufacturer licensees are Mitsumi Electric Co., Ltd., Renesas Technology Corp. (formerly Mitsubishi Electric Corporation) and Nippon Precision Circuits Inc.



IP Telephony Business Segment



Our wholly-owned subsidiary QTelNet Inc. develops and sells Internet telephony systems under the brand-name FreeRideTM. Our FXS and FXO gateways can be combined in a number of different ways to connect remote office locations using VoIP technology. The growing adoption of broadband access is making it easier for smaller sized businesses to utilize VoIP products. Businesses can easily and seamlessly connect office phone systems, and extend their office phone capability to remote offices or home offices that have a broadband connection. Typical applications for FreeRide products are implementations that eliminate long distance charges between offices, extend existing switchboard functionality to encompass remote teleworkers or offices and provide VoIP over broadband wireless.



In April, 2003 QTelNet acquired all of the assets of e-tel Corporation, consisting primarily of Internet telephony-enabling software, hardware inventory and trademark rights, for the purchase price of approximately $525,000 which was paid by way of cash and an offset of $500,000 against a secured claim in the principal amount of $500,000 owed by e-tel to QSound.



Since the acquisition QTelNet has upgraded and added functionalities to our VoIP software, re-designed the internal layout and external features of our gateways, and secured a cost-effective, overseas manufacturing partner.



E-commerce Business Segment



QCommerce provides electronic commerce enabling services to small businesses. We provide Web merchants with all of the tools necessary to set up and operate an on-line store, including custom design and programming, domain name registration, hosting, merchant credit card account set-up, technical support services and marketing and advertising services to drive targeted traffic to the store.



QCommerce derives its revenues from monthly service subscription fees paid by merchants for on-line storefront hosting and related services.



We offer the following products for use by our online merchants:



QCart TM is a full-featured Internet-based catalog and transaction system that allows a merchants customers to browse products and purchase them using an optional on-line, real-time secure credit card authorization and verification system, or by manually downloading orders directly from our administration area.  QCarts robust database management system gives the merchant full control over administration processes including pricing data, accounting information and detailed customer order records.





13





---

emerchantProTM user-friendly software products help small businesses build e-commerce web sites, catalog and sell their products or services online, process and ship orders, report on their web businesses and initiate live chats with customers to maximize sales.  Web sites can be up and running in minutes with professional and interactive results.



Revenues by Business Segment



In fiscal 2006, our revenues were $1,799,395 from the audio business segment, $158,269 from the e-commerce business segment, and $31,366 from the telephony segment.  In fiscal 2005, our revenues were $1,304,832 from the audio business segment, $182,940 from the e-commerce business segment and $55,468 from the telephony segment.  In fiscal 2004, our revenues were $1,820,028 from the audio business segment, $245,238 from the e-commerce business segment and $147,912 from the telephony segment.



Revenues by Geographic Market



Audio Business:  In 2006 product sales revenue came primarily from the United States.  Royalties, license and engineering fees came primarily from the United States (43%) and Asia (56%).  In 2005 product sales revenue was split between the United States and Asia.  Royalties and license fee revenue came primarily from the United States (57%) and Asia (36%).  In 2004 product sales revenue was split between the United States and Asia. Royalties and license fee revenue came from the United States (62%) and Asia (28%).



Internet Telephony Business:  In 2006 48% of our revenue came from the United States, 44% from Canada, and 8% from other areas.  In 2005 75% of our revenue came from the United States, 19% from Canada, and 6% from other areas.  In 2004 79% came from the United States, 16% from Canada, and 5% from other areas.  The remaining revenue in 2006, 2005 and 2004 was split among Asia, Europe, Africa and Mexico.



E-commerce Business: Revenue for our e-commerce business segment has come primarily from the United States in 2006, 2005 and 2004.



Seasonality



Historically QSound has experienced increased royalty revenues in our audio business segment during the second and third quarters for consumer electronics and PC sales, all related to the Christmas shopping season. These sales activities decrease during the fourth and first quarters. However, both 2006 and 2005 did not experience this seasonality as royalty revenues have increased quarter over quarter since the second quarter of 2005.  In 2006 and 2005 we did not experience any seasonal changes in our e-commerce business segment, and all revenue from e-commerce continues to be subscription based.    Our IP telephony business is not mature enough to track any seasonality trends.  Overall, seasonality does not have a material effect on our business.



Marketing Channels



Audio Business:  Our audio business segment sales and marketing activities are carried out by employees, and by representatives and agents in Asia that cover Japan, Hong Kong, China, Taiwan, Singapore, South Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, India and Indonesia.  In addition, certain of our semiconductor licensees market and promote their QSOUND-enhanced products to third parties worldwide. Our downloadable software products are marketed primarily through RealNetworks, and also by participants in our affiliate marketing program, and from our own web sites.



Internet Telephony Business:  Sales and marketing activities of our IP telephony products are directed and carried out by distributors.



E-commerce Business:  We are managing our existing client base and we do not actively carry on sales and marketing in this business segment.  We effectively manage the costs for this business segment resulting in a net contribution to the Company.  We continue to monitor this industry for business opportunities.



Intellectual Property



QSOUND technologies and products are covered by a variety of intellectual property protections which include patent, copyright, trade secret and trademark laws, and contractual obligations. However, there can be no assurance that competitors will not be able to produce non-infringing technologies, products or services, or that third parties will not assert infringement claims against us.





14





---

We hold fourteen patents in the United States, including four patents which cover the fundamental technology applicable to our Q3D positional audio, QSURROUND, and stereo enhancement technologies. In addition, one patent covers binaural hearing aid technology previously co-developed by QSound Labs and the House Ear Institute of Los Angeles, California.  At the date of this Annual Report, an additional three patent applications for QSOUND complementary and improved technologies have been filed and more applications are in progress.  Patent applications have been made in fourteen foreign countries and a number of foreign patents have been granted, including in Japan.



Our key trademarks, including QSOUND, QSURROUND, microQ and the stylized Q logo are registered in the United States and in various foreign countries. QSound Labs has filed trademark applications for many of its other trademarks in the United States and internationally, and carries on a trademark protection program on an ongoing basis for new trademarks.



QCommerces e-commerce enabling technologies, including software developed for QCart, are covered by copyright and trade secret laws, and contractual obligations.



QTelNets VoIP software and technologies are covered by copyright and trade secret laws, and contractual obligations.  QTelNet's products also include technologies that are licensed from third parties.



Competition



Each of the industries in which we engage is intensely competitive. In these industries we have competitors who have technologies and products that are similar to ours and compete directly with us. Some of these competitors are large, established companies with significantly greater resources. These large companies have advantages including greater financial strength, marketing resources and distribution capabilities, and greater ability to hire skilled personnel. In addition, we face competition from new market entrants.



·

audio industry: Our competitors in the audio industry have products and technologies that compete with us in the mobile devices market; the consumer electronics market; PC multimedia market; audio enhancement software plug-ins for Internet media players; the headphone audio enhancement area; and the multi-channel home theatre market.



·

IP telephony industry: We face significant competition in the IP telephony business. We expect competition to remain intense as existing communications companies enter into and new entrants emerge in this market.



·

electronic commerce industry: We face many competitors in the electronic commerce industry and the number of companies providing products and services similar to ours is increasing at a rapid rate. These companies sell products and services similar to those we offer, including building Internet-based electronic storefronts, hosting merchant sites and providing marketing services.



There are no governmental regulations in the audio or e-commerce industries that have a material effect on our business, other than regulations that affect the carrying on of business generally.  In the IP telephony industry our products are subject to testing and certification in the United States, Canada and other countries to satisfy a variety of regulatory requirements and protocols, such as for example to avoid interference with radio frequencies and to comply with emission standards.



C.  Organizational Structure



QSound Labs, Inc. is the parent of QSound Ltd., a California corporation and wholly owned subsidiary that owns certain assets including several patents, and of QTelNet Inc., an Alberta corporation and wholly owned subsidiary that operates our Internet telephony activities.  QSound Ltd. is the parent of wholly owned subsidiary QCommerce Inc., a Washington corporation, which operates our e-commerce business segment.



D.  Property, Plants and Equipment



Our head office, including research facilities and a sound studio, is located at 400  3115 12th Street NE, Calgary, AB, Canada T2E 7J2 where we lease approximately 10,648 square feet of office space until October 31, 2008 at a rental rate of $7,986.00 Cdn. per month. We have the option to renew the lease for an additional two-year term at then prevailing market rates.  Our audio, e-commerce and Internet telephony businesses are operated from our Calgary office.



We own computers, software, electronics equipment, studio and audio equipment, and electronics laboratory and testing equipment, all of which is used by us in the development of our technologies and products.  All of this equipment is located at our head office in Calgary. We also own Web servers which are located mainly off-site.



15





---



ITEM 4A.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS



Not Applicable.



ITEM 5.  OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS



The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of the Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) is provided to assist readers in understanding of QSound and its subsidiaries financial performance during the periods presented and significant trends that may impact the future performance of
QSound. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of QSound Labs, Inc. for the years ended December 31 2006, 2005 and 2004 and the related notes thereto.



The selected financial data presented below is presented in United States dollars and in accordance with Canadian GAAP. For a discussion of the principle differences between QSounds financial results as calculated under U.S. GAAP, see note 17 to the consolidated financial statements of
QSound.



Overview



QSound Labs is a developer and provider of software solutions for audio, voice and e-commerce applications. We operate our business through three different operating units; QSound Labs, the parent company; its wholly-owned subsidiary QTelNet Inc; and its wholly-owned subsidiary QCommerce Inc.



Audio Business Unit



Our Audio business unit develops and licenses audio solutions to the worlds leading manufacturers of consumer products as well as semiconductor solution providers for these products. Specifically, these are products for the mobile phone, home theatre, video gaming, portable audio and computer markets. Revenues from this business unit comprised 90%, 84% and 82% of total consolidated revenues in fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004 and are derived primarily through licensing fees,  non-recurring engineering  fees and per unit royalty agreements.



Telephony Business Unit



Our Telephony business unit develops and distributes IP Telephony products which are targeted for the small business environment. Revenues from this business unit comprised 2%, 4% and 7% of total consolidated revenues in fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004 and are derived from product sales to distributors.



E-Commerce Business Unit



Our E-Commerce business unit provides electronic commerce services, such as on-line storefront hosting and shopping carts, to small businesses. Revenues from this business unit comprised 8%, 12% and 11%of total consolidated revenues in fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004 and are comprised primarily of monthly subscription fees.



Critical Accounting Estimates



The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The Company evaluates its estimates on an ongoing basis, based on historical experience and other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.



The Company believes the following describes the significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.



Stock-based Compensation



As of January 1, 2003, the Company adopted prospectively the fair value based method of accounting for stock options, which means that the amount expensed in each period for common share options granted to employees, officers and directors is the fair value of the options, calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model net of estimated forfeitures amortized over the vesting period of the options. Compensation expense of $381,000 was recorded in 2006, (2005: $135,000; 2004 $320,000).





16





---

Convertible Notes



The fair value of the equity component of the convertible notes and the warrants issued as part of the agreement were calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model which incorporated estimates of expected term.



A.  Operating Results



In 2006 the Companys net loss narrowed to $1,734,224 ($0.19 per share) compared to $2,550,708 ($0.30 per share) and $1,925,946 ($0.25 per share) in 2005 and 2004, respectively.



QSounds strategic decision to focus on its audio business segment and more specifically positioning its technology for the mobile device market has led to the narrowing of the loss as the Company is beginning to see increases in its recurring royalty revenues from its licensees. The Company also continues to seek out new licensees from which we derive up front licensing fees and non-recurring engineering fees as compensation for customization, integration support and specific engineering requirements.



This strategic repositioning, which saw revenue decrease to $1,543,240 in 2005 from $2,213,178 in 2004,  has meant that 2006 has seen both an increase in total revenue to $1,989,030 and a further departure from the more recent revenue generators, namely product sales. Moving to a more royalty and license fee derived revenue stream has also resulted in the gross margin increasing consistently over the years 2004 through to 2006 (81%, 88% and 98% respectively). The following table sets out the consolidated operating data as a percentage of total revenue for the three years ending December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.



|                                       | 2006 |   | 2005 |   | 2004 |  
|-------------------------------------- | ---- | - | ---- | - | ---- | -
|Royalty, Licenses and Engineering Fees | 85   | % | 68   | % | 53   | %
|Product Sales                          | 15   |   | 32   |   | 47   |  
|Total Revenue                          | 100  |   | 100  |   | 100  |  
|Cost of product sales                  | 2    |   | 12   |   | 19   |  
|Gross Margin                           | 98   |   | 88   |   | 81   |  
|Expenses:                              |      |   |      |   |      |  
|Marketing                              | 58   |   | 62   |   | 57   |  
|Operations                             | 7    |   | 14   |   | 11   |  
|Product Engineering                    | 41   |   | 66   |   | 43   |  
|Administration                         | 49   |   | 57   |   | 36   |  
|Foreign Exchange Loss                  | 1    |   | -    |   | 2    |  
|Amortization                           | 16   |   | 23   |   | 21   |  
|Impairment of assets                   | 8    |   | 34   |   | -    |  
|Total Expenses                         | 180  |   | 256  |   | 170  |  
|Loss before other items                | (82  | ) | (168 | ) | (89  | )
|Other Items:                           |      |   |      |   |      |  
|Interest Income                        | (4   | ) | (4   | ) | (4   | )
|Interest on convertible debt           | 3    |   | -    |   | -    |  
|Accretion of debt discount             | 2    |   | -    |   | -    |  
|Loss before taxes                      | (83  | ) | (164 | ) | (85  | )
|Taxes                                  | 3    |   | 2    |   | 1    |  
|Net loss                               | (86  | ) | (166 | ) | (86  | )



A continuing factor throughout the Companys results for the three years ended December 31 2006, 2005 and 2004 is the continuing weakening (13% over the period 2004 to 2006) of the US dollar. Whilst this has no effect on the reported revenues, as revenue is invoiced and collected in United States Dollars it does, however, impact reported expenses. This is because most of the operations are located in Canada and the majority of expenses are paid in Canadian dollars, and as such reported expenses are affected by the Canadian / United States exchange rate. During fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, this had a negative impact on the our total operating expenses.



Discussion and analysis



Below we provide information on the significant line items in our statement of operations for the past three fiscal years, as well as analysis of the changes year-on-year.





17





---





Revenues



|                                                 |  | 2006   |   |  | 2005   |    |  | 2004   |  
|------------------------------------------------ |  | ------ | - |  | ------ | -- |  | ------ | -
|Royalties, licenses and engineering fees ($ 000) |  | $1,693 |   |  | $1,056 |    |  | $1,162 |  
|Change year-on-year                              |  | 60     | % |  | (9     | %) |  | 49     | %





The increase in licensing and royalty revenues from 2005 to 2006 arose from both increasing recurring royalty revenues and license fees resultant from new license agreements. Royalty revenues are derived from licensees sales of mobile devices incorporating microQ technology. During 2006 royalty revenue increased to $630,000 (2005: $345,000, 2004: $534,000) from 22 licensees compared to 17 in 2005 and 13 in 2004. The royalties in 2004 were uplifted by $173,000 due to royalties received relating to hearing aid technology. The Company has not received royalties relating to this technology in 2005 or 2006. The Company continued to achieve new license wins which attract license and engineering fees resulting in license and engineering fees totaling $1,063,000 during 2006 (2005: $ 711,000, 2004: $628,000). The increase is reflective of an increase in the negotiated fee level, as the number of licensees attracting license and engineering fees has remained constant throughout the reported periods (2006: 12, 2005: 14, 2004: 13), together with fees received for the new voice chat conferencing system.



Product Sales



|                      |  | 2006 |    |  | 2005 |    |  | 2004   |   
|--------------------- |  | ---- | -- |  | ---- | -- |  | ------ | --
|Product Sales ($ 000) |  | $296 |    |  | $487 |    |  | $1,051 |   
|Change year-on-year   |  | (39  | %) |  | (54  | %) |  | (17    | %)



The continuing decrease between 2005 and 2006 is attributable to a number of factors.



Demand for our analog integrated circuits has further decreased as demand for digital enabled products has increased, to the extent that in 2006 there were no analog chip sales, accounting for $115,000 of the $191,000 product sales decline.  The move from analog integrated circuits to digital enabled products was first encountered in 2005 when sales of this product fell by 67% ($216,000) over 2004.



Sales to one of our distribution partners who has accounted for 34%, 27% and 30% of the product sales revenue in 2006, 2005 and 2004 respectively, has continued to see declining sales during 2006. The impact on the Company is a reduction in revenue of $30,000 in 2006 over 2005.



Sales in our telephony division continued to decline in 2006. Revenues fell by 44% (2005: 62% decline, 2004: 20% decline) from $55,000 to $31,000 during 2006. This decline was expected as the anticipated product launch scheduled to occur during 2005 was abandoned.



The final factor in the decrease of product sales has been the continued decrease in revenues from our e-commerce business unit. This business unit continues to receive no investment in marketing activities resulting in a continuing decline in subscriptions. The year on year decline has, however, slowed as a core subscription plateau is reached. Revenues from this business sector for 2006 were $158,000 (2005: $183,000, 2004: $245,000)



Expenses

|                    |  | 2006   |   |  | 2005   |    |  | 2004   |   
|------------------- |  | ------ | - |  | ------ | -- |  | ------ | --
|Marketing ($000)    |  | $1,158 |   |  | $1,000 |    |  | $1,251 |   
|Change year-on-year |  | 16     | % |  | (20    | %) |  | (4     | %)



As a result of the strategic realignment to focus more on the audio business segment marketing expenditures grew during 2006 as the Company increased the level of marketing support for its microQ software technology. This increased support was mainly through hiring of new personnel in the later part of the year, together with an increased presence at international trade shows, most notably in Asia. The declines shown for 2005 and 2004 relate to cutbacks in marketing support for the telephony business segment, with the large decline in 2005 primarily as a result of the closure of our sales and marketing office.



|                            |  | 2006 |    |  | 2005 |   |  | 2004 |  
|--------------------------- |  | ---- | -- |  | ---- | - |  | ---- | -
|Product Engineering ($ 000) |  | $819 |    |  | $952 |   |  | $964 |  
|Change year-on-year         |  | (14  | %) |  | 17   | % |  | 16   | %



18





---

Both 2004 and 2005 had increased levels of activity due to introduction of the microQ software technology which is reflected in the expense levels for these two years. During 2006, the Company has seen continued high levels of activity relating to microQ software projects, as reflected with increasing license fee revenue. However, the continuing decline in telephony and e-commerce revenue has meant further reductions in engineering support for these business segments, to the extent where any engineering support for the existing product lines is now minimal, thus accounting for the overall reduction in engineering costs.



|                      |  | 2006 |   |  | 2005 |   |  | 2004 |  
|--------------------- |  | ---- | - |  | ---- | - |  | ---- | -
|Administration ($000) |  | $972 |   |  | $883 |   |  | $801 |  
|Change year-on-year   |  | 10   | % |  | 10   | % |  | 38   | %



Administration costs have increased in 2006 primarily due to an increase in compensation expenses. The Company has seen both its non-cash stock based compensation and salaries and recruitment costs increase over the prior year. This is in addition to the fact that the US Dollar has further weakened during the year making the Canadian cost base more expensive, which contributed to the increase in costs reported in 2005 compared to 2004.







|                                     |  | 2006 |  | 2005 | 2004
|------------------------------------ |  | ---- |  | ---- | ----
|($000)                               |  |      |  |      |     
|Impairment of Property and Equipment |  | $168 |  | $90  |    
|Impairment of Intangible Assets      |  |     |  | $428 |    



At December 31, 2006 management evaluated its Telephony business segment assets for impairment and determined that the carrying value of these assets was not recoverable, resulting in an impairment of $168,000 being recorded. This impairment was in addition to the $518,000 recorded in 2005 on specific Internet telephony assets.



Summary of Quarterly Financial Data



The unaudited selected quarterly financial data presented below is presented in United States dollars and in accordance with Canadian GAAP as is follows:

|               |           |           |             |           |           |           |           |          
|-------------- | --------- | --------- | ----------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|               | 2005      | 2006     
|               | Q1        | Q2        | Q3          | Q4        | Q1        | Q2        | Q3        | Q4       
|Revenue        | 476,744   | 401,044   | 262,437     | 403,015   | 673,770   | 430,168   | 341,687   | 543,405  
|Net Loss       | (375,147) | (481,160) | (1,219,178) | (475,223) | (200,351) | (491,072) | (533,020) | (509,781)
|Loss per share | (0.04)    | (0.06)    | (0.14)      | (0.06)    | (0.02)    | (0.06)    | (0.06)    | (0.05)   







As the Companys recurring royalty revenue continues to grow quarter over quarter, revenue levels are primarily affected by any large license or non-recurring engineering fees that have been negotiated within the license agreements.



Sales for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 increased 35% to $543,405 from $403,015 for quarter ended December 31, 2005 reflecting both an increase in license fees (361%) and recurring royalty revenue (59%). Net loss was $509,781 or $0.05 per share (basic) for the quarter ended December 31, 2006, compared to $475,223 or $0.06 per share for the quarter ended December 31, 2005. The improvement is driven by increased revenues as expenses remained comparable at $959,641 with the previous year ($939,488).



Due to continuing product launches by licensees during 2006, revenues for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 increased 59% from $341,687 to $543,405, reflecting both an increase in license fees (119%) and recurring royalty revenue (45%). Net loss was $509,781 or $0.05 per share (basic) compared to $533,020 or $0.06 per share for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. The narrowing of the loss being driven by the net effect of increased revenues balanced by higher marketing expenses, resultant from hiring new marketing personnel during the quarter ended December 31, 2006.



As part of the year end close and audit process accounting the Company determined, in accordance with Section 3860 of the CICA Handbook, that a component of the convertible notes should have been classified as equity rather than as a liability. The cash proceeds of the notes were allocated to the components based on initial fair values. Accordingly the Company has recorded $340,826 within equity at December 31, 2006.





19





---

Restatement of Reconciliation to U.S. GAAP note for 2006 quarterly financial statements

As described in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company entered into a Convertible Promissory Note Agreement on March  27, 2006.



Initially, the Company determined that the conversion feature of the Promissory Note met the criteria of an embedded derivative in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, (SFAS 133) and paragraphs 12-32 of EITF-0019. Accordingly, the conversion feature of the debt was bifurcated and accounted for as a derivative. As a result the Company recorded the conversion feature as  a liability on the balance sheet and incurred a one time interest charge of $224,633 in the income statement.

During discussions at the year-end audit, it came to managements attention that reference should be made to all of the discussions within EITF-0019 and on this basis, the conversion feature met the scope exemption requirements of paragraph 11 of SFAS 133 and accordingly should not have been treated as a derivative. As a result, the Company now has recorded the conversion feature as equity and there is no interest charge required.

Over the term of the convertible note, the original accounting would have resulted in a non-cash charge to earnings of $1,224,633 as compared to a non-cash charge of $920,000 on a restated basis. The net effect of this restatement for 2006 is an increase in shareholders equity of $369,958.



The tables below present a restatement of the Reconciliation to U.S. GAAP note for the quarters ending March 31, 2006, June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2006.



|Three months ended                                | September 30, 2006 |                    |   | June 30, 2006 |             |   | March 31, 2006 |            
|------------------------------------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | - | ------------- | ----------- | - | -------------- | -----------
|Net loss for the period as reported in accordance |                    |                    |   |               |             |   |                |            
|with Canadian GAAP                                |                    | $(533,019          | ) |               | $(491,072   | ) |                | $(200,351  
|Amortization of deferred development costs        |                    |                   |   |               |            |   |                | 20,218     
|Amortization of debt discount                     |                    | 10,658             |   |               | 10,546      |   |                | 463        
|Net loss under US GAAP                            |                    | $(522,361          | ) |               | $(480,526   | ) |                | $(179,670  
|Loss per share (basic and diluted) under US GAAP  |                    | $(0.06             | ) |               | $(0.05      | ) |                | $(0.02     
|                                                  |                    |                    |   |               |             |   |                |            
|                                                  |                    |                    |   |               |             |   |                |            
|Excerpts from Balance Sheets:                     |                    |                    |   |               |             |   |                |            
|                                                  |                    | As reported        |   |               |             |   |                |            
|                                                  |                    | in accordance with |   |               |             |   |                | Under      
|March 31, 2006                                    |                    | Canadian GAAP      |   |               | Differences |   |                | US GAAP    
|Convertible debt                                  |                    | $345,490           |   |               | $(273,045   | ) |                | $72,445    
|Warrants                                          |                    | 1,027,114          |   |               |            |   |                | 1,027,114  
|Contributed Surplus                               |                    | 2,365,547          |   |               | 272,582     |   |                | 2,638,129  
|Deficit                                           |                    | (46,452,627        | ) |               | (262,248    | ) |                | (46,714,875
|                                                  |                    | As reported        |   |               |             |   |                |            
|                                                  |                    | in accordance with |   |               |             |   |                | Under      
|June 30, 2006                                     |                    | Canadian GAAP      |   |               | Differences |   |                | US GAAP    
|Convertible debt                                  |                    | $360,129           |   |               | $(283,591   | ) |                | $76,538    
|Warrants                                          |                    | 1,027,114          |   |               |            |   |                | 1,027,114  
|Contributed Surplus                               |                    | 2,478,591          |   |               | 272,582     |   |                | 2,751,173  
|Deficit                                           |                    | (46,943,699        | ) |               | (251,702    | ) |                | (47,195,401
|                                                  |                    | As reported        |   |               |             |   |                |            
|                                                  |                    | in accordance with |   |               |             |   |                | Under      
|September 30, 2006                                |                    | Canadian GAAP      |   |               | Differences |   |                | US GAAP    
|Convertible debt                                  |                    | $374,995           |   |               | $(294,252   | ) |                | $80,743    
|Warrants                                          |                    | 1,027,114          |   |               |            |   |                | 1,027,114  
|Contributed Surplus                               |                    | 2,555,561          |   |               | 272,582     |   |                | 2,828,143  
|Deficit                                           |                    | (47,476,718        | ) |               | (241,041    | ) |                | (47,717,759



20





---



B.  Liquidity and Capital Resources



As at December 31, 2006 we had cash and cash equivalents of $2,316,476.  This is an increase of $1,093,747 (89%) over the balance at December 31, 2005 of $1,222,729. $708,652 (2005: $1,594,557) of cash was used in operations during the 2006 fiscal year with non-cash working capital decreasing by $181,317 during the year to $88,642 from $269,959 in 2005.  Financing activities generated $1,857,883 in cash during fiscal 2006 (2005: $165,008) from the exercise of options and the issuance of the convertible loan note.



Cash used in investing activities decreased to $55,484 in 2006 (2005: $675,265).The high level in 2005was attributable to the investment the Company made in the development of software.



At December 31, 2006 we had working capital resources available of $2,405,118 (2005: $1,492,688). Management feels that with our current cash on hand and anticipated cash flows from operations we have sufficient capital to carry out our business plan for 2007.



C.  Research and Development



Audio Business: QSound carries out sustained research and development activities in the audio business segment, allowing us to maintain our position as a world leader in audio enhancement with cutting edge products and technologies. In 2006, 2005 and 2004 we continued our previous research and development activities of developing new, and refining and upgrading existing, audio synthesis and enhancement technologies. This work is in part carried out through work with our licensees and business partners through integration of our technology into their products and also through joint venture projects. In 2006 and 2005 continued development and refinement of the Companys microQ scalable software engine was the main in house focus. In 2004 the Companys efforts were mainly centred on microQ and the QVE audio engine. The Companys audio research and development costs were $813,839 in 2006, $948,580 in 2005 and $962,340 in 2004. Also during 2006 and 2005, the Company, through participation in a venture arrangement, undertook development of a voice chat conferencing system, incurring costs of $39,500 and $352,750 respectively. These costs have been capitalized and from 2006, when commercial production commenced, will be amortized over the useful economic life of the asset.  The Company has three patent applications, two of which were filed in 2003 and 2005, in progress, as well as further applications in development.  (See Intellectual Property under Item 4 of this Annual Report.)



E-commerce Business:  Research and development expenditures in our e-commerce business segment have steadily decreased, reflecting the performance of our products. There were no research and development activities in 2006, with expenditures in 2005 and 2004 totalling $32,872 and $39,032 respectively relating to upgrading of products.



Internet Telephony Business:  Subsequent to the abandoning of a telephony project in 2005 the Company has not incurred any further research and development expenses within its telephony business segment. During 2005 the Company incurred expenditures of $112,387 (2004: $561,192) relating to this project. Due to the abandonment of the project an impairment charge totaling $518,207 was booked as the Company determined that the carrying value of the project assets were not recoverable. However, further to resolution of legal proceedings with the project developer during 2006, the Company now has possession of the assets and fully intends to use these in the future.  In 2004 the Company had further expenditures of $138,812 for activities consisting of upgrading and adding functionalities to our software, and re-designing the internal layout and external features of our gateways.



Share Capital



During the 2006 fiscal year, our share capital increased from 8,661,985 common shares with a book value of $45,979,055 to 9,375,585 common shares with a book value of $47,208,942.  The main reason for the increase of 713,600 shares was as a result of 500,000 warrants being exercised for cash of $520,000, with the remainder of the increase being attributable to the exercise of stock options for cash of $353,600.  Other changes in the book value are from a reclassification from warrants and contributed surplus on the exercise of the warrants and stock options of $372,005 and the payment of financing costs in cash of $15,718.



During 2005 fiscal year, our share capital increased from 8,404,085 common shares with a total bookvalue of $45,792,526 to 8,661,985 common shares with a book value of $45,979,055.  The increase of 257,900 shares was a result of the exercise of stock options for cash of $201,000.





21





---

As at December 31, 2006 the Company had 981,700 options outstanding at exercise prices ranging from $0.47 to $5.33 and expiring at various times up to 2015.  Further details on stock options outstanding can be found in Note 10 to the financial statements.



Subsequent to the year end and up to February 28, 2007, 20,000 stock options have been exercised for total cash consideration of $72,300 and reclassification from contributed surplus of $37,269. This brings the total shares outstanding at the date of this Annual Report to 9,395,585 with a book value of $47,318,511 and reduces the total options outstanding to 961,700.



During 2006 400,000 common share purchase warrants were issued as part of the convertible loan note transaction (see below). The fair value of the warrants, determined to be $340,826 using the
Black-Scholes Pricing Model, was charged to warrants within shareholders equity.



As at December 31, 2006, the Company had 614,130 common share purchase warrants outstanding.  These warrants entitle the holder to acquire one common share of the Company for $4.50 to $9.12 per share.  Further details on warrants outstanding can be found in Note 8 to the financial statements.



Convertible Note



On March 27, 2006, the Company issued $1,000,000 in convertible notes and 400,000 related share purchase warrants (as previously described). The notes are due in five years and bear interest at the US prime rate payable quarterly in arrears.



The notes are convertible at the option of the holders at any time and from time to time into common stock of the Company at a conversion price of $3.25 per share. Additionally, in the event that the Company issues securities convertible into common stock at a price less than this conversion price, the conversion price shall be immediately adjusted to the price at which such securities were issued.



The warrants issued are each exercisable into one common share at an exercise price of $4.50 per share until March 27, 2011.



The warrants also contain provisions to adjust the exercise price in the event that the Company issues securities convertible into shares at a price less than the then applicable exercise price, in which case the exercise price shall be reduced to the same terms as the convertible securities issued.  At the date of this Annual Report there are no market related conditions that would automatically cause the conversion price to decrease.



The convertible note is a financial instrument comprising both an equity component and a liability component, which together with the warrants have been fair valued on initial recognition. Fair value of the equity component and the warrants were calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model, and the fair value of the liability component was calculated as the present value of the principal and interest payments. The total cash proceeds have been allocated to these components on a pro-rata basis using these calculated fair values. The fair value of the warrants and equity component of the convertible note were calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model.



As a result of the fair value on initial recognition $340,826 and $314,396 have been allocated to warrants and the equity component respectively, with the remaining $344,778 being shown within liabilities. The amounts initially allocated to the convertible notes will be accreted to the notes fair value over its term of five years.



D.  Trends



The continuing growth in the mobile device market and the increasing adoption of audio features for this market has been the single most important trend for audio IP suppliers during the past three years. The Company has focused primarily on this market segment during this period. Specifically, the focus has been on the largest segment of this market  mobile phones. High-end phones are now shipping with the capability of offering mobile TV, downloadable music and video game services all of which require audio processing. All phones require the capability to play ring tones.



As the mobile device market continues to be driven by Asian growth, the Company derives an increasing percentage of total audio revenue from Asia. To date, the majority of revenue derived from this market segment has been license fees and custom engineering fees.  This has continued to be the case during 2006 with revenues from this source totaling $1,063,000 (2005: $711,000, 2004: $628,000) with the split between geographic segments as outlined:



2006

2005

2004

Asia

71%

43%

30%

US

29

48

48



22





---

Europe

-

7

11

Canada

-

-

8

Other

-

2

3



The Company anticipates that it will continue to acquire new licensees through marketing of existing audio and voice IP, together with development of new technology.



Most of the Companys license agreements incorporate per unit royalties. Significant recurring royalty revenue began in the fourth quarter of 2005 and the Company saw quarter on quarter growth throughout 2006 in its recurring royalty revenues from the mobile device market, growing to $630,000 (2005: $345,000, 2004: $362,000). With continuing product launches by our Asian licensees the percentage of recurring royalties received from Asia has had increasing influence on this revenue as a whole.



2006

2005

2004

Asia

43%

42%

37%

US

56

55

60

Other

1

3

3



With the continued signing of new licensees the Company believes that as these licensees introduce new mobile devices to the market it will result in continuing growth in recurring royalty revenues, with an increasing percentage being derived from Asia.



As the Company will continue to focus its development and marketing efforts on providing audio and voice IP to OEMs in 2007, its other business segments, e-commerce and IP telephony, are expected to continue at current performance levels.



With the increased focus on marketing its microQ software technology, the Company believes that marketing expenditure will increase in 2007. This is directly attributable to increased compensation levels as a result of new hires in the latter part of 2006, together with an increased presence at international trade shows.



Other costs will not be affected through the increase in revenues as they mostly comprise fixed compensation and travel expenses.



The Company has no plans for any major capital expenditures.



E.  Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements



We are not a party to and we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.



F.  Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations



less

more

than 1

1-3

3-5

than 5

Contractual Obligations

Total

year

years

years

years



$

$

$

$

$



Long-term Debt Obligations

1,349,438

82,500

165,000

1,101,938

-

Capital (Finance) Lease Obligations

-

-

-

-

-

Operating Lease Obligations

203,131

96,847

106,284

-

-

Purchase Obligations

-

-

-

-

-

Other Long-Term Liabilities

-

-

-

-

-



G.  Safe Harbour



This document and other documents filed by the Company with the SEC contain certain forward-looking statements with respect to the business of the Company, including prospective financing arrangements. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including those mentioned above, which may cause actual results to differ significantly from these forward-looking statement.





ITEM 6.  DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES





23





---

A.  Directors and Senior Management



The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our executive officers and directors as of March 1, 2007.  Mr. Doug Drury, formerly Controller, left the Company on October 6, 2006. Mr. Murray Bruce joined QSound as Controller on December 4, 2006.  All positions indicated below are with QSound Labs, Inc. only.



Name

Position



David J. Gallagher

President, Chief Executive Officer, Director



Joanna Varvos

Corporate Secretary



Murray Bruce

Controller



Stanley E. MacDougall

Director



M. Patty Chakour

Director



D. Tony Stelliga

Director



David J. Gallagher has served as President and Chief Executive Officer since June, 1992 and as a director since February, 1991.  Mr. Gallagher joined our Company in 1989 and has acted as Vice-President, Finance, as Chief Financial Officer and as Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Gallagher has over twenty-one years experience in technology development and commercialization.



Joanna Varvos is Corporate Secretary of QSound.  Ms. Varvos is a barrister and solicitor, admitted to the Law Society of Alberta in 1979.  Ms. Varvos has provided legal services to QSound Labs since 1989 and was previously in private practice with a emphasis on corporate and securities law.



Murray Bruce, a chartered accountant, joined QSound as our Controller on December, 4, 2006.  Mr. Bruce has over eleven years of public and corporate accounting experience, with five years in managing Company-wide financial accounts systems.  From September, 2005 to December, 2006 Mr. Bruce was an audit manager with Deloitte and Touche in Calgary, Alberta and prior, from 1999 to 2005 he acted as financial accountant with responsibilities including preparation of accounts, budgets and corporation tax computations for Cambridge Laboratories Limited, U.K.



Stanley E. McDougall was appointed to the board of directors on March 1, 2004.  Mr. McDougall is Chairman of Western Crating International Ltd., a Calgary, Alberta based export packaging company. Mr. McDougall has thirty-seven years of business experience in situations ranging from start-up companies to large multi-plant operations, and including leading operations, acquisitions, financings, restructuring and dispositions.  Mr. McDougall is a member of the board of directors of Richer Systems Group, a private software Company serving the international transportation and leasing industry.  Mr. McDougall has a B.Comm. (Honours) from the University of Saskatchewan.



M. Patty Chakour was appointed to the board of directors on March 10, 2004.  Ms. Chakour is Chief Financial Officer of T.P Racing L.L.L.P., a $350 million Company that owns and operates Turf Paradise, a Phoenix, Arizona based horse racing track that includes an off-track betting network, and dining and entertainment facilities.  Ms. Chakour has over twenty-oneyears experience in accounting including S.E.C. reporting, audits, budget preparation, internal accounting control implementation, consolidations, international operations and tax reporting.  Ms. Chakour has a B.B.A in accounting from the University of Iowa and a C.P.A. certification in Iowa and Arizona.



D. Tony Stelliga was elected to the board of directors at the meeting of shareholders held on April 29, 2005.  Since April, 2003, Mr. Stelliga is Chairman and CEO of Quellan Inc., a California based leading edge communications technology Company that designs and develops integrated circuits for high speed communications equipment. Prior, Mr. Stelliga held various management and strategic positions at Intel Corporation and earned the Presidents Intel Achievement Award in 2002 for leading Intels entry into broadband networking following the acquisition of Softcom Microsystems, a developer of network processors, of which he was a founder. Mr Stelliga, who has a B. Sc. in computer science from the University of Ottawa, holds sixteen patents in broadband networking and processing architectures.



There are no family relationships between any directors or officers of QSound.  There are no arrangements or understandings between any director or officer of the Company and any other person pursuant to which the director or officer was selected, except for employment agreements between QSound and Messrs. Gallagher and Bruce.





24





---

B.  Compensation



Remuneration paid or payable to our directors and executive officers during fiscal year 2006 was an aggregate $375,879 for compensation paid to Messrs. Gallagher, Drury, Bruce and Ms. Varvos.  No cash or otherbonuses were paid to executive officers in 2006.  Mr. Gallaghers salary for 2006 was $211,314 ($240,000 Cdn.). In December 2005, the compensation committee determined that certain of Mr. Gallaghers outstanding options be amended by extending the expiry dates by five years.  Options to purchase 165,810 common shares at the exercise price of  $0.47 which were to expire on December 2, 2006 are granted under the Companys 1998 Stock Option Plan and the amendment did not require shareholder approval.  At the meeting of shareholders held on April 28, 2006 shareholders approved the amendment of options to purchase 235,190 common shares at the exercise price of $1.04, which were to expire on July 22, 2006.



Mr. Gallaghers contract provides for salary, discretionary bonuses if approved by the board, and participation in any pension and profit sharing plan established from time to time by the board.  If terminated without cause, if Mr. Gallaghers employment contract is not renewed for at least one year following expiration, if there is a change in control of the Company and Mr. Gallagher elects not to continue his employment, and in the event of death or disability Mr. Gallagher is entitled to a lump sum payment equal to the greater of salary for the unexpired term of the employment agreement or one year.  A lump sum contribution to fund Mr. Gallaghers pension plan is also payable in the foregoing circumstances and in the event of retirement prior to the age of  65.  Mr. Gallaghers employment contract was renewed on September 30, 2005 for a further two year term. If there is a change in control of the Company Mr. Gallagher is entitled to vesting of any unvested options.



Mr. Gallagher participates in a registered individual pension plan that was put in place in 2002 to resolve an outstanding contingency relating to his employment contract.  In 2006 $24,153 Cdn. was contributed to the plan for fiscal 2006.  In 2005 $22,749 Cdn. was contributed to the plan for fiscal 2005.  Further, $17,400 Cdn. (of $23,500 Cdn. which was accrued in 2005 as settlement for past wages that had been deferred by Mr Gallagher prior to 2002) was contributed in 2006 to Mr. Gallaghers RSP.   In 2004 $14,822 Cdn. was contributed to the plan for fiscal 2004.



Our directors were paid cash compensation in the aggregate of $26,000 for their services in their capacity as directors; in addition, directors are reimbursed for reasonable travel and lodging expenses incurred in the provision of such services and receive stock options.



The following table gives information concerning stock options granted as compensation to outside directors during 2006.  These options were approved by shareholders at the annual meeting of shareholders held on April 28, 2006.



|                     |               |                          |                |                               |            
|-------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------ | -------------- | ----------------------------- | -----------
|Name                 | Date of Grant | No.  of  Options Granted | Exercise Price | Market Price on Date of Grant | Expiry Date
|M. Patty Chakour     | May 1, 2006   | 10,000                   | $5.02 U.S.     | $5.02 U.S.                    | May 1, 2011
|Stanley E. McDougall | May 1, 2006   | 10,000                   | $5.02 U.S.     | $5.02 U.S.                    | May 1, 2011
|D. Tony Stelliga     | May 1, 2006   | 10,000                   | $5.02 U.S.     | $5.02 U.S.                    | May 1, 2011



C.  Board Practices



During 2006, the members of our board of directors were David J. Gallagher, Stanley E. McDougall, M. Patty Chakour and D. Tony Stelliga.  Directors are elected annually by shareholders at our annual meeting of shareholders, and serve until their successors are elected or appointed.



Our board of directors has two standing committees: an audit committee and a compensation committee.  Members of these committees are independent of management and qualify as independent under all relevant Canadian securities, SEC and NASDAQ Stock Market rules and regulations. These independent directors hold regularly scheduled meetings at which only independent directors are present.  At the date of this Annual Report the members of these committees are Stanley E. McDougall, M. Patty Chakour and D. Tony Stelliga.



Audit Committee



All audit committee members must be able to read and understand fundamental financial statements and at least one member of the audit committee must have a background in financial reporting, accounting or auditing which results in the members financial sophistication.



The primary duties and responsibilities of the audit committee are to:



25





---



·

appoint, compensate and oversee our external auditors;

·

review and discuss with our external auditors their independence;

·

review and consider with our external auditors significant accounting principles and practices, alternate treatments of financial information and all material written communications between our external auditor and management;

·

review our financial statements and disclosures with management and our external auditors;

·

meet at least once a year in separate sessions with management, the internal auditor and our external auditors;

·

review, monitor and control our information and reporting systems and financial risk exposures; and

·

establish procedures for treatment of complaints regarding accounting and auditing matters.



Compensation Committee



The primary duties and responsibilities of the compensation committee are:



·

development of guidelines for compensation of officers and key executives and evaluation of compensation data for companies that are similar to us in size and scope of business;

·

review and approval of corporate goals and objectives relevant to CEO compensation, evaluation of the CEO's performance in light of these goals and objectives, and determination of the CEO's compensation based on this evaluation;

·

annual review and approval of the compensation of officers and other key executives of the Company; preparation of a report to shareholders for inclusion in our information circular relating to the annual shareholder meetings; and

·

annual reassessment of the adequacy of the charter and recommendation of any proposed changes to the board.



D. Employees



At December 31, 2006 we had  25employees and persons engaged by contract on a fulltime basis,of whom11 were in research, product development and technical support,6 were in marketing and sales,2 were in customer supportand 6were in administrative positions.  At December 31, 2005 we had  24 employees and persons engaged by contract on a fulltime basis, of whom 11 were in research, product development and technical support, 5 were in marketing and sales, 2 were in customer support and 6 were in administrative positions. One of these employees was located in the United States, one was in the U.K., and the remainder were located in Canada. At December 31, 2004 we had  28 employees and persons engaged by contract on a fulltime basis, of whom 11 were in research, product development and technical support, 8 were in marketing and sales, 3 were in customer support and 6 were in administrative positions.  Two of these employees were located in the United States and the remainder were located in Canada.



We are not subject to any collective bargaining agreements and believe our relationship with our employees is satisfactory.



E.  Share Ownership



The following tables show information as to share ownership by directors and executive officers as of March 1, 2007.



Shares



|                                                  |                                   |                 
|------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------- | ----------------
|Name and Position                                 | Common Shares Owned or Controlled | Percent of Class
|David J. Gallagher
President and CEO
and Director | 491,0001                          | 5.2%            
|Joanna Varvos
Corporate Secretary                 | 126,0002                          | *               
|Murray Bruce
Controller                           | 0                                 | *               
|Stanley E. McDougall
Director                     | 45,0003                           | *               
|M. Patty Chakour
Director                         | 20,0004                           | *               
|D. Tony Stelliga
Director                         | 20,0004                           | *               





26





---

1Includes options to purchase 466,000 common shares.

2Options to purchase 126,000 common shares.

3Includes options to purchase 10,000 common shares.

4Options to purchase 20,000 common shares.

* represents less than 1%



Options



The following tables show information as to options granted to directors and executive officers as of March 1, 2007.





|                                                  |                          |                   |                                                 
|------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | ----------------- | ------------------------------------------------
|Name and Position                                 | Options                  | Exercise Price    | Expiry Date                                     
|David J. Gallagher
President and CEO
and Director | 235,190
130, 810
100,000 | $1.04
$0.47
$1.65 | July 22, 2011
December 2, 2011
December 30, 2007
|Joanna Varvos
Corporate Secretary                 | 25,467
50,533
50,000     | $1.04
$0.47
$2.05 | July 22, 2011
December 2, 2011
April 1, 2009    
|Murray Bruce
Controller                           | 30,0001                  | $4.96             | December 3, 2011                                
|Stanley E. McDougall
Director                     | 10,000                   | $5.02             | May 1, 2011                                     
|M. Patty Chakour
Director                         | 10,000
10,000            | $3.57
$5.02       | June 29, 2010
May 1, 2011                       
|D. Tony Stelliga
Director                         | 10,000
10,000            | $3.57
$5.02       | June 29, 2010
May 1, 2011                       



1These options are subject to vesting at the rate of 2500 options per month commencing on June 1, 2007.



The Board of Directors or the compensation committee  may in its discretion from time to time grant options and stock awards to officers, directors, key employees and persons or companies providing services for the Company.  Pursuant to the NASDAQ Stock Market, all such grants made to officers, directors, employees and consultants require the approval of shareholders, unless the grants are made under an equity compensation plan that has been approved by shareholders. To date we have not granted any stock awards.  Under our existing 2006 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors, 120,000 options remain available for the grant of stock options to outside directors.  Under the 2006 Employee Stock Option Plan 10,000 options remain available for grant to employees and consultants that are not officers or directors.



The Board of Directors has approved establishment of an equity compensation plan for officers, employees and consultants which will reserve up to 750,000 shares (2007 Plan).  Awards consisting of stock options and stock awards may be granted under the 2007 Plan.  The 2007 Plan is subject to the approval of shareholders, which we will seek to obtain at the meeting of shareholders scheduled to take place on April 27, 2007.



The Board and the compensation committee  administer our equity compensation plans.  With respect to awards to employees who are not officers and to consultants, the compensation committee  may appoint a committee consisting of one or more persons to determine, among other things, the persons to whom awards will be made, the time or times at which such awards will be granted, the types of awards to be granted and the number of shares subject to such awards, and the specific terms, conditions, performance criteria, restrictions and other provisions applicable to awards, including, but not limited to, the duration, vesting and exercise periods.   In determining the size and vesting provisions of option and stock award grants, the factors considered are the individual's performance, achievement of objectives, responsibilities, base salary level, previous option grants and the overall corporate performance of the Company.



The exercise price of an option will not be less than the fair market value per share on the date of grant.   Options expire no later than the tenth anniversary of the date of grant to the extent they are not previously exercised or forfeited.  Options may be exercised following termination of employment or contractual relationship with the Company, if for cause on the date of termination and if other than for cause for a period of thirty days (twelve months in the event of death or disability) following termination.  The foregoing time periods may be extended by the plan administrator.



The 2007 Plan permits the Company to grant awards of shares to participants upon such terms (including vesting), as the plan administrator may determine.



27





---



In the event there should be any subdivision or consolidation of our common shares the price and number of shares then subject to each option and stock award is to be adjusted equitably so that the optionee's proportionate interest is maintained without change in the aggregate option price.  If we are reorganized or merged with another corporation, provisions shall be made to continue any options then outstanding and to prevent their dilution or enlargement.



ITEM 7.  MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS



A.  Major Shareholders



The following table discloses information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common shares as of March 1, 2007, by each person or entity known to own beneficially more than 5% of our outstanding common shares based on information provided to us by the holders or disclosed in public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission



Name

Number of Common Shares

Percentage of Outstanding

Beneficially Owned1

Common Shares2



KBW Partners

707,6923

7.5%

David J. Gallagher

491,0004

5.2%

Fred Kayne5

665,3466

7.1%



1 These shares do not carry voting rights different from the voting rights of our outstanding common shares.

2The percentage of outstanding common shares is based on 9,395,585 common shares outstanding as of March 1, 2007.

3  307,692 shares are issuable upon conversion of the convertible loan and 400,000 shares are issuable upon the exercise of warrants.  (See Convertible Note in Item 5. of this Annual Report.)

4 Includes options to purchase 466,000 shares.

5  Mr. Kayne is a partner in KBW Partners.

6  These shares are disclosed in Schedule 13D filed on March 27, 2006.



At March 1, 2007 we had 9,395,585 common shares issued and outstanding.  At such date, there were 360shareholders of record in the United States who collectively held approximately 84%of our outstanding common shares.



We are not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by any other corporation, foreign government or legal person.  We know of no arrangements which may result in a change of control of our Company at a future date.



B.  Related Party Transactions



We did not have any material transactions with any of our related parties during fiscal year 2006 except for compensation of executive officers as employees or consultants.  (See Compensation in Item 6. B of this Annual Report).



Except for immaterial advances in the ordinary course of business that may have been outstanding on a short-term basis, no related party was indebted to us during fiscal year 2006.



C.  Interests of Experts and Counsel



Not applicable.



ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION



A.  Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information



See Item 17.



Export Sales



In the past three fiscal years we have derived over 97% of our revenues from export sales made to customers outside Canada. In 2006 47% of our export sales were made to the United states, 52% were made to Asian companies located in Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Korea and China, and a further 1% were made to other areas.  In 2005 63% of our export sales were made to the United States, 32% were made to Asian companies located in Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Korea and China, and a further 4% were made to other areas.  In 2004 64% of our export sales were made to the United States, 39% were made to Asian companies located in Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Korea and China and a further 7% were made to other areas.





28





---

Legal Proceedings



From time to time we may be involved in various disputes and litigation arising in the normal course of business.  As of the date of this Annual Report we are not involved in any legal proceedings that are expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.



Dividend Distribution



We have never made a distribution of dividends.



B.  Significant Changes



There have been no significant changes since the date of the financial statements included in this Annual Report.



ITEM 9.  THE OFFER AND LISTING



A. Offer and Listing Details



Price History



Our shares traded during the periods and at the prices set out below on The NASDAQ Capital Market.



The high and low market prices for the last five fiscal years:



Fiscal Year

High

Low



2006

6.45

3.25

2005

8.47

2.15

2004

8.40

1.52

2003

2.65

1.01

2002

2.28

0.53





The high and low market prices for each of the four quarters of  2006 and 2005:



Quarter Ending

High

Low



December

2006

5.47

4.28

September

2006

5.50

3.58

June

2006

6.45

3.65

March

2005

4.74

3.25

December

2005

4.86

2.15

September

2005

4.04

3.05

June

2005

4.50

3.40

March

2005

8.47

4.34





The high and low market prices for each of the last six months:



Month

High

Low



February

2007

6.09

4.50

January

2007

4.90

4.31

December

2006

5.20

4.57

November

2006

5.47

4.79

October

2006

5.47

4.28

September

2006

5.29

3.95



B.  Plan of Distribution





29





---

Not Applicable



C.  Markets



Our shares trade (since January, 1989) on The NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol QSND (formerly QSNDF).



D.  Selling Shareholders



Not Applicable



E.  Expenses of the Issue



Not Applicable



ITEM 10.  ADDITIONAL INFORMATION



A.  Share Capital



Not Applicable



B.  Memorandum and Articles of Association



Objects and Purposes



Our objects and purposes, which are found in section 6. of our Articles of Continuance, allow us generally to engage in any act or activity that is not prohibited under the laws of the province of Alberta.



Directors



Our by-laws and the laws of the province of Alberta provide that a director must disclose the nature and extent of his or her interest, or the interest of a party in which the director has a material interest, in a material contract with our Company.  The interest must be disclosed at the time the contract is considered or after the interest arises, whichever occurs first.  A director may not approve a contract in which the director or the related party has a material interest unless the contract is an arrangement by way of security for money lent to or obligations undertaken by the director, or relates to his remuneration, or is for indemnity insurance or with an affiliate.  A material contract in which a director has an interest is not void or voidable by reason only of the interest, or because the director is counted to determine the presence of a quorum at the meeting where the contract is considered.  A director or former director to whom a profit accrues as a result of the material contract is not liable to us for the profit only by reason of the interest if the interest of the director was disclosed, the contract was approved by the directors or shareholders and the contract was reasonable and fair to us when approved.



Our by-laws and the laws of the province of Alberta provide that our directors may fix the remuneration of our directors, officers and employees.  Under our by-laws the directors may also by resolution award special remuneration to any director that provides services to us other than routine work ordinarily required of a director.  Directors, officers and employees are entitled to be paid their work-related travelling and other expenses.



Under Alberta law and our by-laws, our directors, or a delegated director, managing director or committee of directors, may borrow money, issue debt obligations, give a guarantee or mortgage or otherwise create a security interest in the property of our Company.



We do not have an age limit requirement for retirement of directors, and our directors are not required to hold our shares in order to be members of the board of directors.



Shares



We are authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares, an unlimited number of first preferred shares, and an unlimited number of second preferred shares.  At the date of this Annual Report there are 9,395,585 common shares, and no preferred shares, outstanding.



Dividends





30





---

Our directors may declare dividends on issued shares. Dividends may consist of shares, money or property. No dividends may be declared if we have reasonable grounds to believe that we are, or would be after payment of the dividend, unable to pay our debts as they become due, or if the realizable value of our assets would be less than our aggregate liabilities and stated capital. Our directors may attach preferential dividend rights to first or second preferred shares. Dividends are paid to preferred shareholders, if their preferred shares carry the right to a preferential dividend, before they are paid to common shareholders.



Voting



Holders of common shares are entitled to one vote for each share they own on any matter that is submitted to a shareholder vote, unless only a different class of shareholders, for example holders of preferred shares, is entitled to vote on that matter.  Our board of directors may attach various voting rights and restrictions to preferred shares.  Shareholders elect our directors to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders, or until their successors are elected or appointed.  Our Articles of Continuance do not provide for cumulative voting for the election of directors.



Other Rights of Shareholders



If we are dissolved or liquidated, we must use our assets to pay liabilities and any remaining assets would be distributed first to preferred shareholders if their preferred shares carry the right to distribution of assets in priority to distribution of assets to common shareholders, and second to the holders of common shares, in proportion to the number of shares they own.  Our common shares do not have any redemption or sinking fund provisions.  There is no liability on the part of any shareholder to further capital calls and there are no provisions discriminating against any existing or prospective shareholder as a result of owning a substantial number of shares.



Shareholders may by special resolution change the rights of holders of our shares.  A special resolution means a resolution passed by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the votes cast by shareholders who voted on the resolution, or signed by all shareholders entitled to vote on that resolution.



We are required by Alberta law and our by-laws to hold an annual meeting of shareholders in each year not later than fifteen months following the last annual meeting.  A notice in writing stating the time and place of the meeting, the nature of any special business to be transacted and the text of the related proposed special resolution must be given to shareholders of record not less than 21 days and not more than 50 days prior to the meeting. In addition, Canadian securities regulatory policy requires us to deliver these shareholder meeting materials to brokers and intermediaries who hold shares on behalf of beneficial shareholders who do not hold their shares of record.  The brokers and intermediaries must seek voting instructions from the beneficial shareholders.  Holders of five percent or more of issued voting shares may requisition the directors to call a meeting for the purpose stated in the requisition.  If the directors do not call a meeting within twenty-one days of the requisition, any shareholder who signed the requisition may call the meeting.  Shareholders may vote at meetings in person or by proxy.



At meetings of shareholders two persons present and each holding or representing by proxy at least one common share constitute a quorum for purposes of selecting a chairman for the meeting or adjourning the meeting. For transacting any business at a shareholders meeting, two persons present and holding or representing by proxy at least five percent of the shares entitled to vote at the meeting must be present.  We have received an exemption from The NASDAQ Stock Market, stating that we are not required to comply with NASDAQs quorum requirement which calls for a quorum of not less than thirty-three and one-third percent of the shares entitled to vote at the meeting.



There are no limitations on rights to hold our shares or to exercise voting rights imposed by Alberta law or by our articles or by-laws. There are no provisions in our articles or by-laws that would have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our Company and that would operate only with respect to a merger, acquisition or corporate restructuring of our Company or subsidiaries.  Our by-laws do not contain any provision governing the threshold above which share ownership must be disclosed.



C.  Material Contracts



We have not entered into any contracts other than agreements entered into in the ordinary course of business.



D.  Exchange Controls



There are no government laws, decrees or regulations in Canada which restrict the export or import of capital or which affect the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to non-resident holders of our common shares.  However, any such remittance to a resident of the United States is generally subject to Canadian withholding tax pursuant to the Income Tax Act



31





---

(Canada) (the Act).  (For further information concerning such non-resident withholding tax, see Item 10 E. Taxation of this Annual Report.)



E.  Taxation



The following is not intended to be, nor should it be considered to be, legal or income tax advice to any particular QSound shareholder or relied upon for tax planning purposes.  Accordingly each shareholder should consult their own independent tax advisors for advice with respect to the income tax consequences to them having regard to their own particular circumstances.



U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences



The following is a summary of the anticipated material U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder (as defined below) arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of common shares of QSound (Common Shares).



This summary is for general information purposes only and does not purport to be a complete analysis or listing of all potential U.S. federal income tax consequences that may apply to a U.S. Holder as a result of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares.  In addition, this summary does not take into account the individual facts and circumstances of any particular U.S. Holder that may affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares.  Accordingly, this summary is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal or U.S. federal income tax advice with respect to any U.S. Holder.  Each U.S. Holder should consult its own financial advisor, legal counsel, or accountant regarding the U.S. federal income, U.S. state and local, and foreign tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares.



Scope of this Summary



Authorities



This summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), Treasury Regulations (whether final, temporary, or proposed), published rulings of the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS), published administrative positions of the IRS, the Convention Between Canada and the United States of America with Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital, signed September 26, 1980, as amended (the Canada-U.S. Tax Convention), and U.S. court decisions that are applicable and, in each case, as in effect and available, as of the date of this Annual Report.  Any of the authorities on which this summary is based could be changed in a material and adverse manner at any time, and any such change could be applied on a retroactive basis.  This summary does not discuss the potential effects, whether adverse or beneficial, of any proposed legislation that, if enacted, could be applied on a retroactive basis.



U.S. Holders



For purposes of this summary, a U.S. Holder is a beneficial owner of Common Shares that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is (a) an individual who is a citizen or resident of the U.S., (b) a corporation, or any other entity classified as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, that is created or organized in or under the laws of the U.S. or any state in the U.S., including the District of Columbia, (c) an estate if the income of such estate is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of the source of such income, or (d) a trust if (i) such trust has validly elected to be treated as a U.S. person for U.S. federal income tax purposes or (ii) a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of such trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of such trust.



Non-U.S. Holders



For purposes of this summary, a non-U.S. Holder is a beneficial owner of Common Shares other than a U.S. Holder.  This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares to non-U.S. Holders.  Accordingly, a non-U.S. Holder should consult its own financial advisor, legal counsel, or accountant regarding the U.S. federal income, U.S. state and local, and foreign tax consequences (including the potential application of and operation of any tax treaties) of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares.



U.S. Holders Subject to Special U.S. Federal Income Tax Rules Not Addressed



This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares to U.S. Holders that are subject to special provisions under the Code, including the following U.S. Holders:  (a) U.S. Holders that are tax-exempt organizations, qualified retirement plans, individual retirement accounts, or other tax-deferred accounts; (b) U.S. Holders that are financial institutions, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, or regulated



32





---

investment companies; (c) U.S. Holders that are dealers in securities or currencies or U.S. Holders that are traders in securities that elect to apply a mark-to-market accounting method; (d) U.S. Holders that have a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar; (e) U.S. Holders that are liable for the alternative minimum tax under the Code; (f) U.S. Holders that own Common Shares as part of a straddle, hedging transaction, conversion transaction, constructive sale, or other arrangement involving more than one position; (g) U.S. Holders that acquired Common Shares in connection with the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation for services; (h) U.S. Holders that hold Common Shares other than as a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code;  (i) U.S. Holders who are U.S. expatriates; or (j) U.S. Holders that own (directly, indirectly, or constructively) 10% or more of the total combined voting power of the outstanding shares of QSound.  U.S. Holders that are subject to special provisions under the Code, including U.S. Holders described immediately above, should consult their own financial advisor, legal counsel or accountant regarding the U.S. federal income, U.S. state and local, and foreign tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares.



If an entity that is classified as a partnership (or pass-through entity) for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds Common Shares, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to such partnership (or pass-through entity) and the partners of such partnership (or owners of such pass-through entity) generally will depend on the activities of the partnership (or pass-through entity) and the status of such partners (or owners).  Partners of entities that are classified as partnerships (or owners of pass-through entities) for U.S. federal income tax purposes should consult their own financial advisor, legal counsel or accountant regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares.



Tax Consequences Other than U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences Not Addressed



This summary does not address the U.S. state and local, U.S. federal estate and gift, or foreign tax consequences to U.S. Holders of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares.  Each U.S. Holder should consult its own financial advisor, legal counsel, or accountant regarding the U.S. state and local, U.S. federal estate and gift, and foreign tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares.  (See TaxationCanadian Federal Income Tax Consequences above).



U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Acquisition, Ownership, and Disposition of Common Shares



Distributions on Common Shares



General Taxation of Distributions



A U.S. Holder that receives a distribution, including a constructive distribution, with respect to the Common Shares will be required to include the amount of such distribution in gross income as a dividend (without reduction for any Canadian income tax withheld from such distribution) to the extent of the current or accumulated earnings and profits of QSound.  To the extent that a distribution exceeds the current and accumulated earnings and profits of QSound, such distribution will be treated (a) first, as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of a U.S. Holders tax basis in the Common Shares and, (b) thereafter, as gain from the sale or exchange of such Common Shares.  (See more detailed discussion at Disposition of Common Shares below).



Reduced Tax Rates for Certain Dividends



For taxable years beginning before January 1, 2011, a dividend paid by QSound generally will be taxed at the preferential tax rates applicable to long-term capital gains if (a) QSound is a qualified foreign corporation (as defined below), (b) the U.S. Holder receiving such dividend is an individual, estate, or trust, and (c) such dividend is paid on Common Shares that have been held by such U.S. Holder for at least 61 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date.



QSound generally will be a qualified foreign corporation under Section 1(h)(11) of the Code (a QFC) if (a) QSound is eligible for the benefits of the Canada-U.S. Tax Convention, or (b) the Common Shares are readily tradable on an established securities market in the U.S.  However, even if QSound satisfies one or more of such requirements, QSound will not be treated as a QFC if QSound is a passive foreign investment Company (as defined below) for the taxable year during which QSound pays a dividend or for the preceding taxable year.



As discussed below, QSound does not believe that it was a passive foreign investment Company for the taxable year ended December 31, 2006, and does not expect that it will be a passive foreign investment Company for the taxable year ending December 31, 2007.  (See more detailed discussion at Additional Rules that May Apply to U.S. Holders below).  However, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the determination made by QSound concerning its passive foreign investment Company status or that QSound will not be a passive foreign investment Company for the current taxable year or any subsequent taxable year.  Accordingly, although QSound expects that it may be a QFC for the taxable year ending December 31, 2007 , there can be no assurances that the IRS will not challenge the determination made by QSound concerning its QFC



33





---

status, that QSound will be a QFC for the taxable year ending December 31, 2007 or any subsequent taxable year, or that QSound will be able to certify that it is a QFC in accordance with the certification procedures issued by the Treasury and the IRS.



If QSound is not a QFC, a dividend paid by QSound to a U.S. Holder, including a U.S. Holder that is an individual, estate, or trust, generally will be taxed at ordinary income tax rates (and not at the preferential tax rates applicable to long-term capital gains).  The dividend rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own financial advisor, legal counsel, or accountant regarding the dividend rules.



Distributions Paid in Foreign Currency



The amount of a distribution paid to a U.S. Holder in foreign currency generally will be equal to the U.S. dollar value of such distribution based on the exchange rate applicable on the date of receipt.  A U.S. Holder that does not convert foreign currency received as a distribution into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt generally will have a tax basis in such foreign currency equal to the U.S. dollar value of such foreign currency on the date of receipt.  Such a U.S. Holder generally will recognize ordinary income or loss on the subsequent sale or other taxable disposition of such foreign currency (including an exchange for U.S. dollars).



Dividends Received Deduction



Dividends paid on the Common Shares generally will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction.  The availability of the dividends received deduction is subject to complex limitations that are beyond the scope of this discussion, and a U.S. Holder that is a corporation should consult its own financial advisor, legal counsel, or accountant regarding the dividends received deduction.



Disposition of Common Shares



A U.S. Holder will recognize gain or loss on the sale or other taxable disposition of Common Shares in an amount equal to the difference, if any, between (a) the amount of cash plus the fair market value of any property received and (b) such U.S. Holders tax basis in the Common Shares sold or otherwise disposed of.  Any such gain or loss generally will be capital gain or loss, which will be long-term capital gain or loss if the Common Shares are held for more than one year.  Gain or loss recognized by a U.S. Holder on the sale or other taxable disposition of Common Shares generally will be treated as U.S. source for purposes of applying the U.S. foreign tax credit rules.   (See more detailed discussion at Foreign Tax Credit below).



Preferential tax rates apply to long-term capital gains of a U.S. Holder that is an individual, estate, or trust.  There are currently no preferential tax rates for long-term capital gains of a U.S. Holder that is a corporation.  Deductions for capital losses are subject to significant limitations under the Code.



Foreign Tax Credit



A U.S. Holder that pays (whether directly or through withholding) Canadian income tax with respect to dividends paid on the Common Shares generally will be entitled, at the election of such U.S. Holder, to receive either a deduction or a credit for such Canadian income tax paid.  Generally, a credit will reduce a U.S. Holders U.S. federal income tax liability on a dollar-for-dollar basis, whereas a deduction will reduce a U.S. Holders income subject to U.S. federal income tax.  This election is made on a year-by-year basis and applies to all foreign taxes paid (whether directly or through withholding) by a U.S. Holder during a year.



Complex limitations apply to the foreign tax credit, including the general limitation that the credit cannot exceed the proportionate share of a U.S. Holders U.S. federal income tax liability that such U.S. Holders foreign source taxable income bears to such U.S. Holders worldwide taxable income.  In applying this limitation, a U.S. Holders various items of income and deduction must be classified, under complex rules, as either foreign source or U.S. source.  In addition, this limitation is calculated separately with respect to specific categories of income.  Dividends paid by QSound generally will constitute foreign source income and generally will be categorized as passive income.  The foreign tax credit rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own financial advisor, legal counsel, or accountant regarding the foreign tax credit rules.



Information Reporting; Backup Withholding Tax



Payments made within the U.S., or by a U.S. payor or U.S. middleman, of dividends on, or proceeds arising from the sale or other taxable disposition of, Common Shares generally will be subject to information reporting and backup withholding tax, at the rate of 28%, if a U.S. Holder (a) fails to furnish such U.S. Holders correct U.S. taxpayer identification number (generally on Form W-9), (b) furnishes an incorrect U.S. taxpayer identification number, (c) is notified by the IRS that such U.S. Holder has previously failed to properly report items subject to backup withholding tax, or (d) fails to certify, under penalty of perjury, that such U.S. Holder has furnished its correct U.S. taxpayer identification number and that the IRS has not notified such U.S. Holder that it is



34





---

subject to backup withholding tax.  However, U.S. Holders that are corporations generally are excluded from these information reporting and backup withholding tax rules.  Any amounts withheld under the U.S. backup withholding tax rules will be allowed as a credit against a U.S. Holders U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, or will be refunded, if such U.S. Holder furnishes required information to the IRS.  Each U.S. Holder should consult its own financial advisor, legal counsel, or accountant regarding the information reporting and backup withholding tax rules.



Additional Rules that May Apply to U.S. Holders



If QSound is a controlled foreign corporation or a passive foreign investment Company (each as defined below), the preceding sections of this summary may not describe the U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares.



Controlled Foreign Corporation



QSound generally will be a controlled foreign corporation under Section 957 of the Code (a CFC) if more than 50% of the total voting power or the total value of the outstanding shares of QSound is owned, directly or indirectly, by citizens or residents of the U.S., domestic partnerships, domestic corporations, domestic estates, or domestic trusts (each as defined in Section 7701(a)(30) of the Code), each of which own, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the total voting power of the outstanding shares of QSound (a 10% Shareholder).



If QSound is a CFC, a 10% Shareholder generally will be subject to current U.S. federal income tax with respect to (a) such 10% Shareholders pro rata share of the subpart F income (as defined in Section 952 of the Code) of QSound and (b) such 10% Shareholders pro rata share of the earnings of QSound invested in United States property (as defined in Section 956 of the Code).  In addition, under Section 1248 of the Code, any gain recognized on the sale or other taxable disposition of Common Shares by a U.S. Holder that was a 10% Shareholder at any time during the five-year period ending with such sale or other taxable disposition generally will be treated as a dividend to the extent of the earnings and profits of QSound that are attributable to such Common Shares.  If QSound is both a CFC and a passive foreign investment Company (as defined below), QSound generally will be treated as a CFC (and not as a passive foreign investment Company) with respect to any 10% Shareholder.



QSound does not believe that it has previously been, or currently is, a CFC.  However, there can be no assurance that QSound will not be a CFC for the current or any subsequent taxable year.



Passive Foreign Investment Company



QSound generally will be a passive foreign investment Company under Section 1297 of the Code (a PFIC) if, for a taxable year, (a) 75% or more of the gross income of QSound for such taxable year is passive income or (b) 50% or more of the assets held by QSound either produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income, based on the fair market value of such assets (or on the adjusted tax basis of such assets, if QSound is not publicly traded and either is a controlled foreign corporation or makes an election).  Passive income includes, for example, dividends, interest, certain rents and royalties, certain gains from the sale of stock and securities, and certain gains from commodities transactions.



For purposes of the PFIC income test and asset test described above, if QSound owns, directly or indirectly, 25% or more of the total value of the outstanding shares of another foreign corporation, QSound will be treated as if it (a) held a proportionate share of the assets of such other foreign corporation and (b) received directly a proportionate share of the income of such other foreign corporation.  In addition, for purposes of the PFIC income test and asset test described above, passive income does not include any interest, dividends, rents, or royalties that are received or accrued by QSound from a related person (as defined in Section 954(d)(3) of the Code), to the extent such items are properly allocable to the income of such related person that is not passive income.



In addition, if QSound is a PFIC and owns shares of another foreign corporation that also is a PFIC, under certain indirect ownership rules, a disposition of the shares of such other foreign corporation or a distribution received from such other foreign corporation generally will be treated as an indirect disposition by a U.S. Holder or an indirect distribution received by a U.S. Holder, subject to the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed below.  To the extent that gain recognized on the actual disposition by a U.S. Holder of Common shares or income recognized by a U.S. Holder on an actual distribution received on Common Shares was previously subject to U.S. federal income tax under these indirect ownership rules, such amount generally should not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.



If QSound is a PFIC, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares will depend on whether such U.S. Holder makes an election to treat QSound as a qualified electing fund or QEF under Section 1295 of the Code (a QEF Election) or a mark-to-market election under Section 1296 of the Code (a



35





---

Mark-to-Market Election).  A U.S. Holder that does not make either a QEF Election or a Mark-to-Market Election will be referred to in this summary as a Non-Electing U.S. Holder.



Under Section 1291 of the Code, any gain recognized on the sale or other taxable disposition of Common Shares, and any excess distribution (as defined in Section 1291(b) of the Code) paid on the Common Shares, must be ratably allocated to each day in a Non-Electing U.S. Holders holding period for the Common Shares.  The amount of any such gain or excess distribution allocated to prior years of such Non-Electing U.S. Holders holding period for the Common Shares generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the highest tax applicable to ordinary income in each such prior year.  A Non-Electing U.S. Holder will be required to pay interest on the resulting tax liability for each such prior year, calculated as if such tax liability had been due in each such prior year.



A U.S. Holder that makes a QEF Election generally will not be subject to the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above.  However, a U.S. Holder that makes a QEF Election generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on such U.S. Holders pro rata share of (a) the net capital gain of QSound, which will be taxed as long-term capital gain to such U.S. Holder, and (b) and the ordinary earnings of QSound, which will be taxed as ordinary income to such U.S. Holder.  A U.S. Holder that makes a QEF Election will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on such amounts for each taxable year in which QSound is a PFIC, regardless of whether such amounts are actually distributed to such U.S. Holder by QSound.



A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election generally will not be subject to the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above.  A U.S. Holder may make a Mark-to-Market Election only if the Common Shares are marketable stock (as defined in Section 1296(e) of the Code).  A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election will include in gross income, for each taxable year in which QSound is a PFIC, an amount equal to the excess, if any, of (a) the fair market value of the Common Shares as of the close of such taxable year over (b) such U.S. Holders tax basis in such Common Shares.  A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election will, subject to certain limitations, be allowed a deduction in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of (a) such U.S. Holders adjusted tax basis in the Common Shares over (b) the fair market value of such Common Shares as of the close of such taxable year.



QSound does not believe that it was a PFIC for the taxable year ended December 31, 2006, and does not expect that it will be a PFIC for the taxable year ending December 31, 2007.  The determination of whether QSound was, or will be, a PFIC for a taxable year depends, in part, on the application of complex U.S. federal income tax rules, which are subject to differing interpretations.  In addition, whether QSound will be a PFIC for the taxable year ending December 31, 2007 and each subsequent taxable year depends on the assets and income of QSound over the course of each such taxable year and, as a result, cannot be predicted with certainty as of the date of this Annual Report.  Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the determination made by QSound concerning its PFIC status or that QSound was not, or will not be, a PFIC for any taxable year.



The PFIC rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own financial advisor, legal counsel, or accountant regarding the PFIC rules and how the PFIC rules may affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Shares.



Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations



The following is a general summary of certain Canadian federal income tax considerations generally applicable to a holder of QSound common shares that is not a resident of Canada and holds such common shares as capital property, both for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the Act).  The discussion does not address all of the potentially relevant Canadian federal income tax matters and it does not address consequences peculiar to persons subject to special provisions of Canadian federal income tax law including a financial institution as defined in the Act subject to the mark-to-market rules or a shareholder an interest in which would be a tax shelter as defined in the Act.



This summary is based upon the current provisions of the Act and the Regulations promulgated thereunder and our understanding of the current administrative practices published by the Canada Revenue Agency.  This summary takes into account proposals to amend the Act and Regulations announced prior to the date hereof (although no assurances can be given that such changes will be enacted in the form presented or at all), but does not otherwise take into account or anticipate any other changes in law, whether by judicial, governmental or legislative action or decision nor does it take into account any provincial, territorial, local or foreign tax considerations which may vary significantly from those discussed herein.  Accordingly, holders and prospective holders of our shares should consult their own tax advisors about the federal, provincial, territorial, local and foreign tax consequences to them of purchasing, owning and disposing of such shares having regard to their particular circumstances.



The Act provides that dividends and other distributions which are deemed to be dividends and which are paid or credited, or are deemed to be paid or credited by a corporation resident in Canada, to a person who is not resident of Canada for purposes of the Act shall be subject to withholding tax equal to 25 percent of the gross amount of the dividend.  This rate of withholding tax is



36





---

subject to reduction if the provisions of a tax treaty between Canada and the country in which the recipient is resident provides for a lesser rate of withholding tax.



Shareholders who are residents of the United States for purposes of the Canada-United States Income Tax Convention (1980) (the 1980 Convention) will generally be entitled to the benefits of the 1980 Convention.



Article X of the 1980 Convention generally provides that the rate of Canadian withholding tax on dividends paid or deemed to be paid by a corporation resident in Canada to a corporation resident in the  United States that beneficially owns at least 10 percent of the voting stock of the corporation paying the dividend shall not exceed 5 percent.  Otherwise, for persons that are resident in the United States for the purposes of the 1980 Convention, and except as described below, the rate of non-resident withholding shall not exceed 15 percent of the dividend.  Where the dividends are received by a resident of the United States carrying on business in Canada through a permanent establishment in Canada or by a person who performs independent personal services in Canada from a fixed base situated in Canada, and the holding of the shares in respect of which the dividends are paid is effectively connected with that permanent establishment, the dividends are generally subject to Canadian tax as business profits or income from rendering such services and the 1980 Convention does not limit the Canadian tax payable on such income under the Act.



Generally a non-resident person is not subject to income tax in Canada on any capital gain arising on the disposition of shares of a corporation which are listed on a prescribed stock exchange unless such shares constitute taxable Canadian property to such holder.  Generally, shares will be taxable Canadian property to a non-resident person only if, at any time during the five year period immediately preceding the disposition, the non-resident person, either alone or together with persons with whom such non-resident did not deal at arms length, owned  25 percent or more of the issued shares of any class of the capital stock of the corporation, or the non-resident's shares were acquired in a tax deferred exchange in consideration for property that was itself taxable Canadian property.



Article XIII of the 1980 Convention generally provides that gains realized on the disposition of shares of a corporation that is a resident of Canada by a resident of the United States for purposes of the 1980 Convention, may not be taxed in Canada unless the value of those shares is derived principally from real property situated in Canada or the shares form part of the business property of a permanent establishment which the resident of the United States has or had in Canada within the 12 month period preceding the date of disposition or if the shares pertain to a fixed base in Canada which is or was available within the 12 month period preceding the date of disposition for the purpose of performing independent personal services.  However, Article XIII permits Canada to tax gains on shares of other corporations (including substituted shares), if the United States resident was a resident of Canada for 120 months during any prior 20-consecutive-year period and at any time during the preceding 10 years and owned our common shares at the time the person emigrated from Canada.



In situations where our common shares constitute taxable Canadian property, and the treaty benefits under the 1980 Convention discussed above or treaty benefits under any other applicable tax convention, are not applicable, one-half of any capital gain (a taxable capital gain) realized by a shareholder in a taxation year must be included in the shareholder's income for the year for Canadian tax purposes, and one-half of any capital loss (an allowable capital loss) realized by a shareholder in a taxation year from the disposition of taxable Canadian property may be deducted from taxable capital gains realized by the shareholder in that year.  Allowable capital losses for a taxation year in excess of taxable capital gains for that year generally may be carried back and deducted in any of the three preceding taxation years or carried forward and deducted in any subsequent taxation year against net taxable capital gains realized in such years, to the extent and under the circumstances described in the Act.



F.  Dividends and Paying Agents



Not applicable.



G.  Statements by Experts



Not Applicable



H.  Documents on display



We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and of Canadian provincial securities laws and regulations in Alberta, Ontario and British Columbia. We file reports, registration statements and other information with the SEC and with Canadian provincial securities regulators. Our reports, registration statements and other information can be found on the SEC website www.sec.gov, on the Canadian System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval website www.sedar.com, and may be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC:



100 F Street, N.E.



37





---

Washington, D.C. 20549.



Copies of these materials can also be obtained by mail at prescribed rates from the Public Reference Section of the SEC at the same address, or by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.



I.  Subsidiary Information



Not Applicable



ITEM 11.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK



Foreign Currency



The Company uses the U.S. dollar as the currency of measurement and display.  The Company is exposed to foreign currency fluctuation on Canadian dollar denominated cash, receivables, and payables.  Canadian dollar denominated accounts receivables are nominal.  Canadian dollar denominated payables are all trade payables arising out of the normal course of business.  Foreign currency risk arising from a decline or increase in the relative value of the Canadian dollar is managed to the extent that the estimated requirement for Canadian dollar denominated cash is kept equal to the amount of Canadian dollar cash on hand.  The majority of overseas transactions are conducted in U.S. dollars.



The Company has not entered into any foreign currency contracts to hedge this risk.



Interest Rates



The Companys exposure to market risk includes changes in interest rates, which relates to both our invested balances of cash and cash equivalents, and convertible loan notes.



The Company invests excess funds in a manner that preserves capital, provides liquidity and generates the highest available after-tax return. To limit exposure to market risk, the Company places its cash in banks and cash not required for immediate operations is placed in bank term deposits. At December 31, 2006 this amounted to $2,055,166 (2005: $1,189,887). The fair value of QSounds cash and cash equivalents would not be significantly impacted by a decrease in interest rates. All cash and cash equivalents are carried at fair value, which approximates cost.



The Companys convertible loan notes are for the principal amount of $1,000,000 and are repayable on March 27, 2011. The notes bear interest at US prime rate, based on the prime rate in effect on the last day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter, and is payable quarterly in arrears. The US prime rate at December 31, 2006 was 8.25%. The weighted average interest rate as at December 31, 2006 was 8.08%. The Company has exposure to interest rate fluctuations on its convertible loan notes but the Company would not be significantly impacted by an increase in interest rates. The convertible loan notes are carried at fair value, with the components being allocated a fair value at date of initial recognition liabilities ($344,778), equity ($314,396) and warrants ($340,826).



The Company has not entered into any contracts to hedge its interest rate risk during 2006.



ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES



Not Applicable.



PART II



ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES



We are not in default on any of our obligations relating to indebtedness. We have not declared any dividends and are not delinquent with respect to the payment of dividends.



ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS



During our last fiscal year, we have not materially modified any of the rights or instruments defining the rights of our security holders.  We do not have any registered securities which are secured by our assets.  We do not have trustees or paying agents for our securities.





38





---

ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES



Based on their evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a  15(e) and 15d  15(e)) as of December 31, 2006, our Chief Executive and Financial Officer has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and are operating in an effective manner.



This Annual Report does not include managements report on internal control over financial reporting pursuant to current SEC rules which do not require such a report to be included.



There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Annual Report that materially affected or were reasonably likely to have materially affected our internal control over financial reporting for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.



ITEM 16. [RESERVED]



ITEM 16A.  Audit Committee Financial Expert



M. Patty Chakour, who became a director on March 1, 2004, serves as the audit committee financial expert.



ITEM 16B.  Code of Ethics



We have adopted a Code of Ethics which applies to all of our officers, directors and employees.  The Code of Ethics may be viewed on our Web site www.qsound.com.  We will mail a copy of the Code of Ethics to you without charge upon request.



ITEM 16C.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services



Audit Fees



Grant Thornton, who acted as our accountants from April 29, 2005 to October 6, 2006, billed $96,000 in 2006 and $11,500 in 2005 for audit services and services related to statutory filings.  KPMG, our external accountants prior to April 29, 2005 and after October 6, 2006, billed $9,520 in 2006, $67,065 in 2005 and $89,000 in 2004 for audit services and services related to statutory filings.



Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees and All Other Fees



Grant Thornton and KPMG did not bill any audit-related, tax or other fees in 2006 or 2005.



Audit Committee Approval



The audit committee approves the engagement of our external auditors for all services on an engagement by engagement basis.



ITEM 16D.  Exemptions from Listing Standards for Audit Committees



Not Applicable.



ITEM 16E.  Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers



Not Applicable.



PART III



ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



Consolidated Financial Statements of QSound Labs, Inc.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to the Shareholders.



Consolidated Balance Sheets  December 31, 2006 and 2005.



39





---



Consolidated Statements of Operations and Deficit  Years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.



Consolidated Cash Flows  Years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  Years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.



ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



Not Applicable.



ITEM 19. EXHIBITS



1.1

Articles of Continuance of QSound Labs, Inc. (formerly called Archer Communications Inc.). (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed June 29, 2001.)



1.2

By-law No. 1 dated July 2, 2002. (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed May 20, 2003.)



1.3

By-law No. 2 dated May 14, 1991. (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed June 29, 2001.)



1.4

Articles of Amendment dated September 3, 1991. (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed June 29, 2001.)



1.5

Articles of Amendment dated July 8, 1992. (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed June 29, 2001.)



1.6

Articles of Amendment dated June 25, 1993. (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed June 29, 2001.)



1.7

Articles of Amendment dated November 26, 1996. (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed June 29, 2001.)



1.8

Articles of Amendment dated January 8, 1997. (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed June 29, 2001.)



2.1

Not Applicable



3.1

Not Applicable



4.1

Form of Stock Option Agreement (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed May 20, 2003.)



4.2

QSound Labs, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed May 20, 2003.)



4.3

Employment Agreement dated September 30, 2002 between David J. Gallagher and QSound Labs, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed May 20, 2003.)



4.4

Employment Agreement dated April 19, 1999 between Francis Munoz and QSound Labs, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed March 21, 2005.)



4.5

Employment Agreement dated June 17, 2002 between Robert Starr and QSound Labs, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed March 21, 2005.)



5.1

Not Applicable.



6.1

Not Applicable.





40





---

7.1

Not Applicable.



8.1

List of Subsidiaries (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed May 20, 2003.)



9.1

Not Applicable.



10.1

Not Applicable



11.1

Code of Ethics   (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed March 31, 2004.)



12.1

Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer under section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



12.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer under section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



13.1

Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer under section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



13.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer under section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



14.1

KPMG Consent of Auditors.



14.2

Grant Thornton Consent of Auditors.



15.1

Audit Committee Charter  (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed March21, 2005.)



15.2

Audit Committee Charter dated  August 2, 2006.







SIGNATURE





The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this Annual Report on its behalf.







QSound Labs, Inc.





/s/ David J. Gallagher

David J. Gallagher

President and Chief Executive Officer



March
 23, 2007





41





---



EXHIBITS  INDEX



Exhibit No.

Description of Document



1.1

Articles of Continuance of QSound Labs, Inc. (formerly called Archer Communications Inc.). (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed June 29, 2001.)



1.2

By-law No. 1 dated July 2, 2002. (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed May 20, 2003.)



1.3

By-law No. 2 dated May 14, 1991. (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed June 29, 2001.)



1.4

Articles of Amendment dated September 3, 1991. (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed June 29, 2001.)



1.5

Articles of Amendment dated July 8, 1992. (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed June 29, 2001.)



1.6

Articles of Amendment dated June 25, 1993. (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed June 29, 2001.)



1.7

Articles of Amendment dated November 26, 1996. (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed June 29, 2001.)



1.8

Articles of Amendment dated January 8, 1997. (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed June 29, 2001.)



2.1

Not Applicable



3.1

Not Applicable



4.1

Form of Stock Option Agreement (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed May 20, 2003.)



4.2

QSound Labs, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed May 20, 2003.)



4.3

Employment Agreement dated September 30, 2002 between David J. Gallagher and QSound Labs, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed May 20, 2003.)



4.4

Employment Agreement dated April 19, 1999 between Francis Munoz and QSound Labs, Inc.(Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed March 21, 2005.)



4.5

Employment Agreement dated June 17, 2002 between Robert Starr and QSoundLabs, Inc.(Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed March 21, 2005.)



5.1

Not Applicable.



6.1

Not Applicable.



7.1

Not Applicable.



8.1

List of Subsidiaries (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed May 20, 2003.)



9.1

Not Applicable.



10.1

Not Applicable



42





---



11.1

Code of Ethics  (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed March 31, 2004.)



12.1

Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer under section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



12.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer under section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



13.1

Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer under section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



13.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer under section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



14.1

KPMG Consent of Auditors.



14.2

Grant Thornton Consent of Auditors.



15.1

Audit Committee Charter (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed March21, 2005.)



15.2

Audit Committee Charter dated  August 2, 2006.





Consolidated Financial Statements









43