alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Deangelo Devonte SMALLWOOD, Defendant.

No. COA18-694

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 16, 2019

NO ERROR IN PART. VACATED IN PART. REMANDED.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Tornado Gold
International Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ending
March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Earl W. Abbott, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, and I, George Drazenovic, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|March 23, 2007 | By:
      /s/ EARL W. ABBOTT               
|-------------- | -------------------------------------------
|               |                                            
|               | Earl W. Abbott                             
|               | President and Chief
      Executive Officer
|               | (Principal Executive Officer)              
|               |                                            
|               |                                            
|               |                                            
|               |                                            
|March 23, 2007 | By:
      /s/ GEORGE DRAZENOVIC            
|               |                                            
|               | George Drazenovic                          
|               | Chief Financial
      Officer              
|               | (Principal Financial
      Officer)        

---
In the MATTER OF the APPEAL OF: KELFORD OWNER, LLC,

No. 446P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Lloyd C. Smith, Jr., Attorney at Law, Jonathan E. Huddleston, Attorney at Law, Lloyd C. Smith, III, Attorney at Law, Windsor, for Bertie County.

Charles B. Neely, Jr., Attorney at Law, Nancy S. Rendleman, Attorney at Law, John Holton, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Kelford Owner, LLC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th of December 2018 by Bertie County in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Stanley MAZUR and Anne-Marie Mazur

No. 332P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Richard Croutharmel, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Mazur, Michael Stanley

Matt Sawchak, Solicitor General, For State of North Carolina

Ryan Y. Park, Deputy Solicitor General, For State of North Carolina

Kathleen Joyce, For Mazur, Anne-Marie

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender

Aaron Thomas Johnson, Assistant Appellate Defender, For Mazur, Anne-Marie

Michelle Liguori, Solicitor General Fellow

Matt Burke, Solicitor General Fellow, For State of North Carolina

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina *842***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of October 2018 by Defendant (Michael Stanley Mazur) for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant (Michael Stanley Mazur) on the 5th of October 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th of October 2018 by Defendant (Michael Stanley Mazur) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
EXHIBIT 99
                           ==========

        Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crafty Admiral Enterprises, Ltd.
(Registrant) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Lawrence Siccia, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Registrant, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

   (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of Registrant.

Dated:  November 12, 2004       /s/ Lawrence Siccia
                              ----------------------------------
                              Chief Executive Officer,
                              Chief Financial Officer and
                              Principal Accounting Officer of
                              Crafty Admiral Enterprises, Ltd.
EXHIBIT 32.2

TELVUE CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. sec. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of TelVue Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Fell, Treasurer
and Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  03/31/10                     /s/John Fell
                                    ------------
                                    John Fell
                                    Treasurer-Controller
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 17

- 00408

- CR

C HASE D ANIEL K ILLION

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from

County Criminal Court No. 1

of T arrant County (1497685)

January 31, 2019

Opinion by Justice Pittman

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the tr ial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By __ /s/ M ark T. P ittman

________________ Justice Mark T. Pittman
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 I 0 0 30

. J OAN W I LKERSON v . AUGUSTA HOSPI TAL, LLC.

J o an W il k ers o n , as Nex t of Ki n an d Ex ecu t ri x o f t h e es t at e o f H a rrel l

W i lk ers o n , J r., s eek s i nt erl o c u t o ry rev i ew of an Au g u s t 19
, 2 0 1 5 o rd er d is m i s s i n g
d efen d an t Au g u s t a Ho sp i t al
, LLC d / b / a Tri n i t y Ho s p i tal o f Au g u s ta. Th e cert i fi cat e

o f i m m ed i at e rev i ew, h o wev er, was n o t en tered u n t i l 2 3 d ay s lat er, o n Sep t em b er 1 1,

2 0 1 5

. Un d er OCGA § 5 -6 -3 4 (b ), a p art y m ay req u es t i n t erl o cu to ry rev i ew o n l y i f t h e

t ri al co u rt cert i fi es wi t h i n t en d ay s o f en try o f t h e o rd er at i s s u e t h at i m m ed iat e rev i ew

s h o u ld be h ad . If t he cert i fi cat e o f i m m ed i at e rev i ew i s n o t en t ered wi t hi n t h at t en

d ay p eri o d
, i t i s un t i m el y , an d t h e p art y s eek i n g rev i ew m u s t wai t un t i l t h e fi n al ju d g m en t t o ap p eal

. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 4 (b ); Tu r n er v. Ha r p er , 2 31 G a. 1 7 5
, 1 7 6 (2 0 0 SE2 d 7 4 8 ) (1 9 7 3 ).
Here, al t h o u gh t h e t ri al co u rt si g n ed t h e cert i fi cat e o f i m m ed i at e rev i ew n u n c

p ro t u n c t o Au g u s t 1 9 , 2 0 1 5 , t h e rel ev an t d at e fo r d et erm i n in g t h e t im el i n es s o f t h e

cert ifi cat e i s t h e d at e i t was en t ered

. See Va n S ch a l l er n v. S t a n co , 1 3 0 Ga. Ap p

. 6 8 7 (2 0 4 SE2 d 3 1 7 ) (1 9 7 4 ) (“ [A] c e r t i fi cat e fo r t h e i m m ed i at e rev iew o f a n o nfi n al o r
i n t erl o cu t o ry ju d g m en t i s i n effect iv e u n l es s en t ered
, i.e., fi l ed wi t h t h e cl erk
, wi t h in

t en d ay s aft er en t ry o f t h e ju dg m en t ap p eal ed fro m .”); W h i t l o ck v. St a te , 1 2 4 Ga. Ap p.
5 9 9, 6 0 1 (1 ) (1 8 5 SE2 d 9 0) (1 9 7 1 ) (“ A n un c p ro t un c en t ry of a cert i fi cat e f o r
i m m ed i at e rev iew can no t rev i v e a ri g h t o f ap peal wh i ch h as ex p i red .”). October 05, 2015Becau s e t h e t ri al co urt d i d n o t en t er t h e cert i fi cat e o f i m m ed i at e rev i ew wi t h in

t en d ay s o f en try o f t h e o rd er at i s s u e , we l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n t o co n s i d er t h i s

ap p li cat io n , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 10/05/2015
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5282 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities 

Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the 

Southern California Desert Region Integrated Water and Economic Sustainability Plan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 3, 2006 

Mr. LEWIS of California introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 

Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to participate in the Southern California 

Desert Region Integrated Water and Economic Sustainability Plan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Southern California 

5 Desert Region Integrated Water and Economic Sustain6 ability Plan Act’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC72 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5282 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and 

3 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (Public Law 102– 

4 575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended by 

5 adding at the end the following new section: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 16ll. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DESERT REGION IN7 TEGRATED WATER AND ECONOMIC SUSTAIN8 ABILITY PLAN. 

9 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera10 tion with the Mojave Water Agency is authorized to par11 ticipate in the design, planning, and construction of 

12 projects to ‘Implement Mojave Water Agency’s Integrated 

13 Regional Water Management Plan’. 

14 ‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the costs 

15 of the projects authorized by this section shall not exceed 

16 25 percent of the total cost. 

17 ‘‘(c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

18 is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

19 $20,000,000.’’. 

20 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec21 tions in section 2 of Public Law 102–575 is amended by 

22 inserting after the last item relating to title XVI the fol23 lowing: 

‘‘16ll. Southern California desert region integrated water and economic sustainability plan.’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC72 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5282 IH

1 (c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not provide 

2 funds for the operation or maintenance of a project au3 thorized by this section. 

4 (d) CREDITS TOWARD NON-FEDERAL SHARE.—For 

5 purposes of subparagraph (b) the Secretary shall credit 

6 the Mojave Water Agency with the value of all expendi7 tures made prior to the date of the enactment of this Act 

8 that are used toward completion of projects that are com9 patible with this section. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC72 with BILLS
MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT REGULATION IX PUBLIC RECORDS

4/20/05 Rule 901 1 RULE 901. PUBLIC RECORDS - DEFINITIONS

(Adopted 3-8-84; and Repealed April 20, 2005)
#### In the Matter of Nelson I. A., Also Known as Nelson E. Administration for Children’s Services et al., Respondents; Louise C., Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 121]

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate the mother’s parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Adams, J.), dated January 28, 1998, which, after a fact-finding hearing, terminated her parental rights and transferred custody and guardianship of the child to the Administration for Children’s Services and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing supports the finding of permanent neglect. The presentment agency established by clear and convincing evidence that it made diligent attempts to strengthen the parent-child relationship, and that despite its encouragement, the mother failed to plan for the child’s future *(see,*Social Services Law § 384-b; *Matter of Nicholas Douglas B.,*254 AD2d 417).

*522The evidence further supports the Family Court’s determination that the child’s best interests would be served by terminating the mother’s parental rights and freeing him for adoption (see, *Matter of Sheila G.,*61 NY2d 368; *Matter of Nicholas Douglas B., supra,*at 418). Krausman, J. P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Fw: FAA APROVAL FOR CHRISTOPHER KABORE -KIDS FLY SAFE

Jeanine Persons

AFS-270, Policy Integration Branch

to: Keira Jones 03/08/2012 01:48 PM

Jeanine Persons

Management Program Analyst

Policy Integration Branch, AFS-270

Air Transportation Division, AFS-200

Flight Standards Service

202-267-8089

Jeanine.Persons@FAA.GOV

----- Forwarded by Jeanine Persons/AWA/FAA on 03/08/2012 01:48 PM -----

From: susiebalius@optonline.net

To: Jeanine Persons/AWA/FAA@FAA

Date: 03/08/2012 01:32 PM

Subject: FAA APROVAL FOR CHRISTOPHER KABORE-KIDS FLY SAFE

Dear Ms. Jeanine Persons:

As per our conversation today on March 8, 2012 I am forwarding an e-mail to withdraw my 

application for a waiver. I requested an FAA weight waiver requirement for purchase of an 

CARES Flight Belt for Kids sold by Kids Fly Safe. It has come to my attention and 

understanding that the approval can only be granted in cases of Special Needs Child / Adult. 

Since my son Christopher Kabore is not a special needs child I will not be able to receive the 

waiver to purchase the belt. My son exceeds the weight requirement for purchase of the original 

belt and I was instructed by both the company and the FAA that I would need to apply for a 

special waiver/approval in order to purchase and utilize the belt. 

I spoke with Ms. Persons twice on March 8, 2012 and I was asked to send an e-mail to withdraw 

my waiver request. Please accept this as my withdrawal for the reason listed above.

If you are in need of additional information or if I can assist you in any way please feel free to 

contact me. 

Regards, 

Susan Kabore
Obligations

% Total 

Obligations Fixed Price Cost T&M/LH Other Competed

Not 

Competed Q1 Q2 

 Special Interest FunctionsB505 COST BENEFIT ANALYSES $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 

D302 ADP SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A D307 AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEM SVCS $165,424 5% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% D310 ADP BACKUP AND SECURITY SERVICES $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A D314 ADP ACQUISITION SUP SVCS $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A R406 POLICY REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES $110,000 3% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 100% R407 PROGRAM EVALUATION SERVICES $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A R408 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES $138,043 4% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% R409 PROGRAM REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A R413 SPECIFICATIONS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A R414 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A R423 INTELLIGENCE SERVICES $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A R425 ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES $512,725 16% 10% 0% 90% 0% 0% 100% 0% R497 PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A R707 MGT SVCS/CONTRACT & PROCUREMENT SUP $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A R699 OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES $1,425,552 43% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% R425 ENGINEERNG & TECHNICAL SERVICESR418 LEGAL SERVICES $166,500 5% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% D307 AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEM SVCSV213 RAIL PASSENGER SERVICES $140,000 4% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100% R408 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICESR406 POLICY REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICESD399 OTHER IT AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS $86,186 3% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100% R704 AUDITING SERVICES $83,098 3% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% B552 SPECIAL STUDIES/ANALYSIS - MANPOWER $74,978 2% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 

see abovesee abovesee above

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB): Service Contract Inventory Summary Report

Contract Type Analysis Competition Analysis Time of O

(as % of PSC obligations) (as % of PSC obligations (as % of 

Biggest Percentage of Obligations

see above
S.J.S., Petitioner/Respondent, v. C.M., Respondent/Appellant.

No. ED 105568

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

FILED: February 20, 2018

Steven A. Waterkotte, St. Loius, MO, for Appellant.

S.J. S.-Pro Se, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

C.M. appeals from the judgment of the circuit court granting a Full Order of Protection against him in favor of S.J.S. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ALLISON FAYE HUFFMAN, )

DOC #T97673, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2471

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 27, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Vivian T. Corvo, 

Judge.

Michael A. Hanson of Hanson Law 

Office, Tampa, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
August 20, 2015

Manager, Flight Standards Service

Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Office

FAA Headquarters, Building 10A

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

Re: Petition to Amend Exemption No. 11253 to Regulatory Docket No FAA-2014-0817

for Drone Fleet & Aerospace Management (DFAM) for additional aircraft.

Attention: FAA UAS Integration Office

DFAM respectfully requests the addition of the following aircraft to our Exemption No. 

11253 and COA FAA-2014-0817-333E:

Additional Aircraft Requested:

• FreeFly Systems Alta

Note Maybe Eligible for Summary Grant/Amendment by previous FAA Analysis of 

Exemption No. 

12103 (Docket No. FAA–2015–0956)

DFAM’s existing safety standards and procedures as outlined in our Flight Operation & 

Procedures Manual (FOPM) will continue for the additional Aircraft. We will follow the 

recommended Maintenance and Operations Parameters set forth by each of these 

respective UAV Manufactures.

Please do not hesitate to contact me at the phone number or via the e-mail address

provided above should you have any questions or concerns.

Respectfully submitted,

Simon Nielsen

CEO, Drone Fleet & Aerospace Management, Inc.

Simon Nielsen

CEO

Drone Fleet & Aerospace Management, Inc.

606 Venice Blvd, Suite E

Venice, CA 90291

(213) 379-0629

Simon.Nielsen@drone-fleet.com

www.drone-fleet.com
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT****PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**(18 U.S.C. SEC.1350)
I, Sherice P. Bench, Chief Financial Officer of American Achievement Corporation and AAC GroupHolding Corp. (the “Companies”), hereby certify that:
(1) The Quarterly Reportof the Companies on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended February 26, 2005 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Companies as of the dates and for the periodsexpressed in the Report.
Date:August 5, 2005         By:             /s/ SHERICE P. BENCH    Sherice P. Bench    CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER