alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Digestive Diseases and Nutrition F32 Review.                     

*Date:*                         March 19, 2009.                     

*Time:*                         2:30 p.m. to 4 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                     

*Contact Person:*                         Atul Sahai, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 759, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-2242,                        *sahaia@niddk.nih.gov*.                     

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 5, 2009. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-5314 Filed 3-11-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Julia E. CARROLL, n/k/a Julia E. Hibberd, Respondent, v. Justin G. CARROLL, Appellant.

No. ED 105393

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

FILED: February 20, 2018

Brittany Anne Brown, Cordell & Cordell, P.C., Chesterfield, MO, for Appellant.

Prudence Fink Johnson, Union, MO, for Respondent.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Justin G. Carroll ("Father") appeals from the Amended Judgment of Modification ("Judgment") awarding Julia E. Carroll n/k/a Julia E. Hibberd ("Mother") and Father joint legal and physical custody of the parties' minor children, awarding Mother the designation of residential parent, and denying Father's request to relocate the parties' minor children. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 48 (Friday, March 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10948]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5344]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, February 26, 2009, 8 a.m. to 
February 28, 2009, 5 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the Federal 
Register on February 6, 2009, 74 FR 6292-6294.
    The meeting will be held March 25, 2009 to March 27, 2009. The 
meeting time and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: March 5, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
 [FR Doc. E9-5344 Filed 3-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Radient Pharmaceuticals Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2011, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas C. MacLellan, Chief Executive
Officer and President of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: June 29, 2012 | /s/ Douglas C. MacLellan          
|------------------- | ----------------------------------
|                    | Douglas C. MacLellan              
|                    | Chief Executive Officer, President



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies this Annual
Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 54 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide reasonable standards 

for congressional gold medals, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2005 

Mr. CASTLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide reasonable 

standards for congressional gold medals, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Congressional Gold 

5 Medal Enhancement Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REASONABLE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED FOR CON7 GRESSIONAL GOLD MEDALS. 

8 Section 5111 of title 31, United States Code, is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following new sub10 section: 
2 

•HR 54 IH 

1 ‘‘(e) CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL STANDARDS.— 

2 ‘‘(1) MAXIMUM NUMBER.—During any calendar 

3 year beginning after December 31, 2005, the Sec4 retary of the Treasury may strike not more than 2 

5 congressional gold medals for presentation pursuant 

6 to an Act of the Congress. 

7 ‘‘(2) PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS.—The Sec8 retary may strike congressional gold medals only in 

9 accordance with the following requirements: 

10 ‘‘(A) RECIPIENTS.—Only an individual 

11 may be a recipient of a congressional gold 

12 medal. 

13 ‘‘(B) TIMING.—No gold medal may be pre14 sented posthumously on behalf of any individual 

15 except during the 20-year period beginning 5 

16 years after the death of the individual (unless 

17 the Act of Congress authorizing the striking of 

18 such medal was enacted before the death of 

19 such individual)’’. 

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 47 (Thursday, March 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5395]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Land Release for Princeton Airport

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration is requesting public 
comment on Princeton Airport (39N), Princeton, New Jersey, notice of 
proposed release from aeronautical use of approximately 7.2 acres of 
airport property, to allow for non-aeronautical development.
    The parcel is located on the southeast corner of Princeton Airport. 
The tract currently consists of 7.2 acres of land and it is currently 
vacant. The requested release is for the purpose of permitting the 
airport owner to sell and convey title of 7.2 Acres for use as a 
medical office building.
    Documents reflecting the Sponsor's request are available, by 
appointment only, for inspection at the Airport Manager's office and 
the FAA New York Airport District Office.

DATES: Comments must be received by April 13, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to 
the FAA at the following address: Steven M. Urlass, Manager, FAA New 
York Airports District Office, 600 Old Country Road, Suite 446, Garden 
City, New York 11530. In addition, a copy of any comments submitted to 
the FAA must be mailed or delivered to Mr. Kenneth Nierenberg, Airport 
Manager, at the following address: 41 Airpark Road, Princeton, New 
Jersey 08540.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven M. Urlass, Manager, New York 
Airports District Office, 600 Old Country Road, Suite 446, Garden City, 
New York 11530; telephone (516) 227-3803; FAX (516) 227-3813; e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b8cbccddcedd96cdcad4d9cbcbf8ded9d996dfd7ce"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c7b4b3a2b1a2e9b2b5aba6b4b487a1a6a6e9a0a8b1">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 125 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation 
Investment and Reform Act for the 1st Century (AIR21) requires the FAA 
to provide an opportunity for public notice and comment before the 
Secretary may waive a sponsor's Federal obligation to use certain 
airport land for aeronautical use.

    Issued in Garden City, New York on February 9, 2009.
Steven Urlass,
Manager, New York Airports District Office, Eastern Region.
 [FR Doc. E9-5395 Filed 3-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit
      13.1**




**CERTIFICATION**





**Under
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
      the**


**Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002**





In
      accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Copernic Inc.
      (the "Company") do hereby certify, to such officers' knowledge,
      that:




(1)
      The
      Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 of the Company
      ("Form 20-F") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
                March 27, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Marc FerlandMarc
                Ferland
              President
                and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
                March 27, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Daniel BertrandDaniel
                Bertrand
              Executive
                Vice President and
              Chief
                Financial Officer
CHAVEZ, et al. v. CARMICHAEL

437PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 6, 2019

Sean F. Perrin, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Carmichael, Irwin (Sheriff).

Sejal Zota, Attorney at Law, W. Rob Heroy, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Chavez, Carlos, et al.

Erez Reuveni, Attorney at Law, Joshua S. Press, Attorney at Law, Gill P. Beck, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for United States.

Deborah Weissman, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Law Scholars and National Immigrant Justice Center.

Raul A. Pinto, Attorney at Law, for North Carolina Justice Center.

Irena Como, Attorney at Law, for ACLU, et al.

R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for The State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of June 2019 by *743ACLU of NC to admit Cody Wofsy Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of June 2019."
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(b)

             CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER RELATING
              TO A PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     I, Arthur B. Winkleblack, Director, Vice President, and Chief Financial
Officer of H. J. Heinz Finance Company, a Delaware corporation ("Heinz
Finance"), hereby certify that, to my knowledge:

     1. Heinz Finance's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July
        28, 2004 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
        amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        Heinz Finance.

Date: September 7, 2004

                                          By: /s/ ARTHUR B. WINKLEBLACK
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name: Arthur B. Winkleblack
                                            Title: Director, Vice President, and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
ROSSI DEJOUR ARMSTEAD , Appellant,

v. STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 4728

_____________________________/ Opinion filed August 28, 2017. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. Michael C. Overstreet , Judge

. Andy Thomas , Public Defender, and Joanna A. Mauer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate , Assistant Attorney General, Tallahass ee , for Appellee.

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT PER CURIAM. We previously affirmed appellant’s sentence s based on our en banc decision
in Walton v. State , 106 So. 3d 522 , 528 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) ( Walton I ), where this court held that “ any ma ndatory minimum term required by section 775.087(2)

– whether the defendant fires a gun, or only carries or displays it

– shall be imposed2 consecutively to any other term imposed for any other felony.” However, the Florida Supreme Court quashed our decisio n in this case and remanded for reconsideration in light of its decisions in Walton v. State , 208 So. 3d 60 (Fla. 2016) ( Walton II ), and Williams v. State , 186 So. 3d 989 (Fla. 2016).
In Williams , the supreme court said that “consecutive sentencing of

ma ndatory minimum imprisonment terms for multiple firearm offenses is impermissible if the offenses arose from the same criminal episode and a firearm was merely possessed but not discharged.” 186 So. 3d at 993; accord Walton II , 208 So. 3d at 64. However, W illiams distinguished between consecutive sentences imposed for two “qualifying felonies” pursuant to the 10

- 20

- Life statute as codified in section 775.087, Florida Statutes (2012), and consecutive sentences imposed for “qualifying felonies” and “non

- quali fying felonies.” Williams , 186 So. 3d at 992. The supreme court noted that the 10

- 20

- Life statute “expressly mandates . . . that a qualifying felony sentence run ‘consecutively to’ any sentence imposed for a non

- qualifying felony.” Id. Here, appellant wa s convicted of (1) principal to home invasion robbery with a firearm; (2) principal to kidnapping; and (3) principal to grand theft of a motor vehicle. Though both robbery and kidnapping may be qualifying offenses pursuant to the 10

- 20

- Life statute, in the current case, the State charged appellant pursuant to the 10

- 20

- Life statute only on the home invasion robbery count. §3 775.087(2)(a)1g, Fla. Stat. The kidnapping in appellant’s case, then, was considered a “non

- qualifying offense.” Martin v. State , 190 S o. 3d 252, 255 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016). Thus, pursuant to Williams , because appellant was convicted of one “qualifying felony ” and two “non

- qualifying felonies , ” the trial court would have been required to r un the sentence s consecutively

. Here, the trial cou rt properly ordered the sentences to run consecutively . We, therefore, affirm. See Martin , 190 So. 3d at 255. WOLF, MAKAR, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

LAWRENCE SETH WAYNE , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2310

[ October 25, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Laura Johnson

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 1998

- CF

- 001923

- AXXX

- MB

.
Lawrence Seth Wayne, South Bay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

C IKLIN , F ORST and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Hewitt Associates, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                      |  |     |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 14, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ John J. Park       
|                      |  |     |  | John J. Park           
|                      |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Hewitt Associates, Inc. and will be retained by Hewitt
Associates, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission as and exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
Exhibit 32.2



               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                       THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dahua Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hua Meng, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Hua Meng
---------------------------------
Hua Meng, Chief Financial Officer

December 12, 2006
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Caldwell ANGRAM

No. 186P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Attorney at Law, Southern Pines, For Angram, Michael Caldwell

Patrick S. Wooten, Assistant Attorney General, Greg Newman, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 17th of May 2019 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 17th of May 2019 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
September 12, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DANFORD MAINTENANCE SERVICE, INC. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00507

- CV V.

THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of APPELLEE, signed April 16, 2012, was heard on the tran script of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order APPELLANT to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
No. 09-9867.

#### In re Jeffrey Lynn Chronister, Petitioner.

559 U.S. 1066, 130 S. Ct. 2138,

176 L. Ed. 2d 758,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3203,

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of ha-beas corpus denied.