Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d and is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNITED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 40071 c/w N o. 09- 40085 C onfer enc e C al endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee v. AL EJANDRO SI LVA , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp eal s f

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or th e S ou t h ernD i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 1 : 0 8
- CR- 1 0 5 0
- ALL U S D C N o . 1 :08 -C R -9 1 1 -1 B ef ore K IN G , JO L LY , an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * A l ej an dro S i lva p l ead ed gu i l t y t o att em pted i l l ega l r een t ry af t er dep ort ati on , ha vi n g previ ou sly been convi ct ed of an aggrav ated fel on y. B ased on a sentenci n g gu i del i n es r an ge of 57 to 71 m on t h s, t h e di st ri ctcourti m posed a s e n t e n c e o f 6 6 m o n t h s in p r is o n . A s ar e s u lto f t h is c o n v ic t io n , S ilv a ’s s upe rvi s e d r e l e as e f

r o m apr i o rc o nvi c t i o n for be i ng unl awf ul l y pr e s e nti n t he United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December

15, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 09- 40071 c/w N o. 09- 40085

2 U ni t e d St at e s w as r e vo ke d. The di s t r i c t c o ur t i m po s e d a s e nt e nc e o f 8 m o nt hs i n pri son to be served co n secu t ivel y t o t h e 66 m on t h s i m posedf or th e new c o nvi c t i o n. S ilv aa r g u e s th a t t h e d is tr ic t c o u r t e r r e db yfa ilin gt o e x p la in a d e q u a te ly t he r eas ons f

ori m pos i ng t he gui del i nes s ent enc e e ven t hough Si lva had pr e s e nt e d no n f

r ivo l o us r e as o ns f o rr e que s t i ng a s e nt e nc e b e l o w t he r e c o m m e nde d r ang e . I n Un i t ed S t ate s v. Pel t i er , 505 F . 3d 389 , 391
- 92 ( 5th C i r. 2 0 0 7 ), this cou rt de term i n edtha t a d efen d a n t’ s fai l u re to ob j ect at sen ten ci n g to t he r e a s o na b l e ne s s o f h i s s e nt e nc e t r i g g e r e dp l a i n e r r o rr e v i e w. S i lva a c k n o w le d g e s th a t c u r r e n t c ir c u it p r e c e d e n t fo r e c lo s e s th e p r o c e d u r a lreasona bl en ess i ssue becau se he can n otshow t h at t h e al l egedprocedu ralerr or w as pl ai n err or. Si lva i s s eeking on l y t o preserve f or f u rt h er revi ew the i ssue of w h et h er a fai l u re t o m ak e a separate obj ect i on t o t h e procedu ralreasonab l en ess o f as e n te n c e m a n d a te s a p p lic a tio n o f p la in -e r r o rre v ie w . S ee Uni t e d S t at e s v. Mondrago n- Sa nt i ago , 564 F . 3d 3 5 7 , 3 64-67 ( 5th C i r. ) ( di scussi n g pl ai n err or r e v ie w w ith re s p e c t t o re a s o n a b le n e s s o f s e n te n c e s ), cer t . den i ed , 130 S. C t . 192 ( 200 9) . A ccor di n gl y, h e h as f i l ed an un opp osed m ot i on f or s u m m ary di sposi t i on t o avoi d th e e x p e n di t u re of t i m e an d resources on f u l lbri ef

i n g t h at c an n ot c h a n g e th e o u tc o m e o f th e a p p e a l. T h e di st ri ctcourt ’ s j u dg m en ti s A F F IR M E D , an d S i lva’ s m ot i on f or s u mm a r yd i s p o s i t i o n i s GRANT ED .