2098 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 9 / Wednesday, January 14, 2009 / Notices 

or by bidders. In addition, the GDIS 

should clearly identify the data type 

(2–D or 3–D, pre-stack or post-stack and 

time or depth); data extent (i.e., number 

of line miles for 2D or number of blocks 

for 3D) and migration algorithm of the 

data and information. The statement 

must also include the name and phone 

number of a contact person, and an 

alternate, who are both knowledgeable 

about the information and data listed 

and available for 30 days post-sale, the 

processing company, date processing 

completed, owner of the original data, 

original data survey name and permit 

number. The MMS reserves the right to 

query about alternate data sets and to 

quality check and compare the listed 

and alternative data sets to determine 

which data set most closely meets the 

needs of the fair market value 

determination process. 

The statement must also identify each 

block upon which a bidder bid, or 

participated in a bid, but for which it 

did not use processed or reprocessed 

pre- or post-stack geophysical data and 

information as part of the decision to 

bid or to participate in the bid. The 

GDIS must be submitted, even if no 

enhanced geophysical data and 

information were used for bid 

preparation of the tract. 

In the event your company supplies 

any type of data to the MMS, in order 

to get reimbursed, your company must 

be registered with the Central Contractor 

Registration (CCR) provided via Web 

site at: http://www.ccr.gov. This is a 

requirement that was implemented on 

October 1, 2003, and requires all entities 

doing business with the Government to 

complete a business profile in CCR and 

update it annually. Payments are made 

electronically based on the information 

contained in CCR. Therefore, if your 

company is not actively registered in 

CCR, the MMS will not be able to 

reimburse or pay your company for any 

data supplied. 

Please also refer to the Final NOS 208 

Package for more detail concerning 

submission of the GDIS, making the data 

available to the MMS following the 

lease sale, preferred format, 

reimbursement for costs, and 

confidentiality. 

Force Majeure: The Regional Director 

of the MMS Gulf of Mexico Region has 

the discretion to change any date, time, 

and/or location specified in the Final 

NOS 208 Package in case of a force 

majeure event which the Regional 

Director deems may interfere with the 

carrying out of a fair and proper lease 

sale process. Such events may include, 

but are not limited to, natural disasters 

(e.g., earthquakes, hurricanes, floods), 

wars, riots, acts of terrorism, fire, 

strikes, civil disorder or other events of 

a similar nature. In case of such events, 

bidders should call (504) 736–0557 or 

access our Web site at: http:// 

www.gomr.mms.gov for information 

about any changes. 

Dated: January 6, 2009. 

Randall B. Luthi, 

Director, Minerals Management Service. 

[FR Doc. E9–695 Filed 1–13–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–624] 

In the Matter of: Certain Systems for 

Detecting and Removing Viruses or 

Worms, Components Thereof, and 

Products Containing Same; Notice of a 

Commission Determination Not To 

Review an Initial Determination 

Terminating the Investigation Based 

on a Cross-Licensing Agreement 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 26) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

terminating the above-captioned 

investigation based on a cross-licensing 

agreement. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Clint Gerdine, Esq., telephone 202–708– 

2310, Office of the General Counsel, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20436. Copies of all nonconfidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone 202–205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

the matter can be obtained by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on December 31, 2007, based on a 

complaint filed on November 21, 2007, 

by Trend Micro Incorporated (‘‘Trend 

Micro’’) of Cupertino, California. 72 FR 

74329–30. The complaint alleges 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain systems for detecting and 

removing viruses or worms, components 

thereof, and products containing same 

by reason of infringement of claims 2 

and 4–22 of U.S. Patent No. 5,623,600 

(‘‘the ’600 patent’’). The complaint 

named three respondents: Barracuda 

Networks, Inc. of Campbell, CA 

(‘‘Barracuda’’); Panda Software 

International S.L. of Spain; and Panda 

Distribution, Inc. of Glendale, CA 

(collectively ‘‘Panda’’). The complaint 

further alleged that an industry in the 

United States exists as required by 

subsection (a)(2) of section 337. 

On March 14, 2008, the Commission 

issued notice of its determination not to 

review an ID granting Trend Micro’s and 

Panda’s joint motion to terminate the 

investigation as to Panda on the basis of 

a settlement agreement. On July 11, 

2008, the Commission issued notice of 

its determination not to review an ID 

granting Trend Micro’s motion to 

terminate the investigation in part on 

the basis of withdrawal of claims 2, 5– 

8, 12, 16–17, 20, and 22 of the ’600 

patent. On September 29, 2008, the 

Commission issued notice of its 

determination not to review an ID 

granting Trend Micro’s motion to 

terminate the investigation in part on 

the basis of withdrawal of claims 14, 

and 18–19 of the ’600 patent. 

On October 16, 2008, Trend Micro 

and Barracuda filed a joint motion to 

terminate the investigation on the basis 

of a cross-licensing agreement. 

The ALJ issued the subject ID on 

December 10, 2008, granting the joint 

motion to terminate. No party petitioned 

for review of the ID pursuant to 19 CFR 

210.43(a), and the Commission found no 

basis for ordering a review on its own 

initiative pursuant to 19 CFR 210.44. 

The Commission has determined not to 

review the ID, and to terminate the 

investigation in its entirety. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

sections 210.21(a) and 210.42(h)(3) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (19 CFR 210.21(a), 

210.42(h)(3)). 

By order of the Commission. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 9 / Wednesday, January 14, 2009 / Notices 2099 

Issued: January 8, 2009. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9–559 Filed 1–13–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–666] 

In the Matter of Certain Cold Cathode 

Fluorescent Lamp (‘‘CCFL’’) Inverter 

Circuits and Products Containing 

Same; Notice of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Institution of investigation 

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

December 15, 2008, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of O2 Micro 

International Ltd. of the Cayman Islands 

and O2 Micro Inc. of Santa Clara, 

California. A letter supplementing the 

complaint was filed on December 24, 

2008. The complaint alleges violations 

of section 337 based upon the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain cold cathode fluorescent lamp 

(‘‘CCFL’’) inverter circuits and products 

containing same that infringe certain 

claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,417,382; 

6,856,519; 6,809,938; and 7,120,035. 

The complaint further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337. 

The complainants request that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue 

exclusion orders and cease and desist 

orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint and 

supplement, except for any confidential 

information contained therein, are 

available for inspection during official 

business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) 

in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 

20436, telephone 202–205–2000. 

Hearing impaired individuals are 

advised that information on this matter 

can be obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server at http:// 

www.usitc.gov. The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David O. Lloyd, Esq., Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, telephone (202) 

205–2576. 

Authority: The authority for institution of 

this investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2008). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

January 8, 2009, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain cold cathode 

fluorescent lamp (‘‘CCFL’’) inverter 

circuits or products containing same 

that infringe one or more of claims 1, 2, 

4, 6–9, 11, 13, and 14 of U.S. Patent No. 

7,417,382; claim 7 of U.S. Patent No. 

6,856,519; claims 1–3 and 6 of U.S. 

Patent No. 6,809,938; and claim 4 of 

U.S. Patent No. 7,120,035, and whether 

an industry in the United States exists 

as required by subsection (a)(2) of 

section 337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainants are — 

O2 Micro International Ltd., Grand 

Pavilion Commercial Centre, West 

Bay Road, Grand Cayman KY1–1209, 

Cayman Islands. 

02 Micro Inc., 3118 Patrick Henry Drive, 

Santa Clara, CA 95054. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Monolithic Power Systems Inc., 6409 

Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose, CA 

95120. 

Microsemi Corporation, 2381 Morse 

Avenue, Irvine, CA 92614. 

ASUSTeK Computer Inc., No. 15, Li-Te 

Road Peitou, Taipei, Taiwan. 

ASUSTeK Computer International 

America, 800 Corporate Way, 

Fremont, CA 94539. 

LG Electronics, LG Twin Towers 

20,Yoido-dong, Youngdungpo-gu 

Seoul, Korea 150–721. 

LG Electronics U.S.A., 1000 Sylvan 

AvenueEnglewood Cliffs, NJ 07632. 

LG Display Co., Ltd., West Tower, LG 

Twin Towers, 20,Yoido-dong, 

Youngdungpo-gu, Seoul, Korea 150– 

721. 

LG Display America, Inc., 150 East 

Brokaw Road, San Jose, CA 95112. 

BenQ Corporation, 16 Jihu Road, Neihu, 

Taipei 114, Taiwan. 

BenQ America Corp., 15375 

BarrancaSuite A205Irvine, CA 92618. 

(c) The Commission investigative 

attorney, party to this investigation, is 

David O. Lloyd, Esq., Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

Paul J. Luckern, Chief Administrative 

Law Judge, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, shall designate the 

presiding Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

Issued: January 8, 2009. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9–561 Filed 1–13–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES