alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TOWN OF NAGS HEAD v. RICHARDSON, et al.

244A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2019

Norman W. Shearin, Attorney at Law, David P. Ferrell, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Richardson, William W., et al

M.H. Hood Ellis, Attorney at Law, Benjamin Marshall Gallop, Attorney at Law, Elizabeth City, for Town of Nags Head.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of August 2018 by Plaintiff to Dismiss and Strike Defendants' Cross-Appeal and Petition for Discretionary Review:

*25"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."

Davis, J. recused
# C_2017255EN.01000201.xml

| 5.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8312 — Panasonic Corporation/Ficosa International)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 255/03)

On 21 April 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8312. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8312. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Tiens Biotech Group (USA), Inc. (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the
undersigned, Jinyuan Li, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Registrant,
and Manbo He, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of and
for the period covered by the Report.





Pursuant
to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this
certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.





Date:
      November 13, 2009/s/Jinyuan
      LiJinyuan
      LiChief
      Executive Officer and President(Principal
      Executive Officer)Date:
      November 13, 2009/s/Manbo
      HeManbo HeChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Accounting and Financial
Officer)
# C_2017411EN.01000301.xml

| 2.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 411/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 411/3

---

Special Report No 18/2017

‘Single European Sky: a changed culture but not a single sky’

(2017/C 411/03)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 18/2017 ‘Single European Sky: a changed culture but not a single sky’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
CERTIFICATIONS

Exhibit 31.1



I, Gregory F. Kowal, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;



2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.  The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.  The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and



6.  The Company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:   February 14, 2008

|                        | 
|----------------------- | 
|                        | 
|/s/ Gregory F. Kowal    | 
|Gregory F. Kowal        | 
|Chief Executive Officer |
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7111
WARWICK HARRELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairwoman for the Virginia Parole Board, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CA-04-379-2) Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 22, 2004 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Warwick Harrell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Warwick Harrell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harrell v. Fahey , No. CA-04-379-2 (E.D. Va. filed June 29, 2004; entered June 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 09-1170.

#### Domingo J. Sepulveda, Petitioner v. State of Nebraska.

560 U.S. 906, 130 S. Ct. 3293,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1186,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3904.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Nebraska denied.

Same case below, 278 Neb. 972, 775 N.W.2d 40.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                EXHIBIT 23-3


February 28, 1997



MCN Corporation
500 Griswold
Detroit, Michigan  48226



RE:     MCN Corporation
        1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K


Ladies and Gentlemen:

The firm of Miller and Lents, Ltd. consents to the use of its name and the
information contained in its report dated January 15, 1997, regarding MCN
Corporation oil and gas reserve information as of December 31, 1996, in its
1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In addition, Miller and Lents, Ltd. consents to the incorporation by reference
of said material in Registration Statement Nos. 333-02105 and 333-02107 on Form
S-8, 333-01521, 333-01523 and 33-57115 on Form S-3 and Post Effective Amendment
No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-21930-99 on Form S-8 of MCN Corporation.

Miller and Lents, Ltd. has no interest in MCN Corporation or in any affiliated
companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive such interest as payment for
such reports and has no director, officer or employee otherwise connected with 
MCN Corporation.  We are not employed by MCN Corporation on a contingent basis.

Very truly yours,





MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.
By P.G. Von Tungeln
   Chairman
Appendix B:  

Written Comments Submitted by Small Entity Representatives in 2013

Small Business Advocacy Review Panel on EPA’s Planned Proposed Rules

Standards of Performance for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills and Review of Emissions

Guidelines for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducted a pre-panel outreach meeting with 

potential Small Entity Representatives (SERs) on October 30, 2013. EPA, along with Panel 

partners, Small Business Administration’s Office of Advocacy (SBA), and Office of 

Management and Budget’s Office of Information and Regulation Affairs (OMB), hosted a Panel 

outreach meeting with SERs on December 19, 2013. 

 
B1: Written Comments from Potential Small Entity Representatives following the 10/30/2013

Pre‐panel Outreach Meeting

For the October 30 pre-panel outreach meeting, the following potential SERs submitted three 

sets of written comments, which are provided in this appendix: 

 Todd Green, American Environmental Landfill 

 Anne Germain, Environmental Industry Associations on behalf of Caroline County, 

Maryland 

 Matt Stutz, Weaver Boos Consultants on behalf of Ponca City, Oklahoma 

 
B3
B4
B5
B6
B7
B8
B9
B10
B11
B12
B13
B14
EXHIBIT 10.4



FIRST AMENDMENT

TO

ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC.

EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN



The ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC. EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN (the Plan) is hereby amended as follows:



|I. | Article XII is amended by adding the following Section 12.5:
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------



12.5    Payment of After-Tax Amounts



Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, any amounts credited to a Participants Deferral
Account, as decreased for net investment losses but not increased for net investment gains, that were reported as taxable income to the Participant in the year credited under the Allergan EDCP shall be distributed to such Participant as soon as
administratively practicable.



|II. | This First Amendment shall be effective as of September 24, 2003.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------



|III. | IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. hereby executes this First Amendment to the Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan on this 21stday of October, 2003.
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC.
|-----------------------------
|                             
|By:                          
|                             
|
In the MATTER OF Susan E. ROWELL, Respondent.

Appellate Case Nos. 2019-000681 & 2019-000683

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

April 25, 2019

**493ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel asks this Court to place Respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(c), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, and/or transfer Respondent to incapacity inactive status pursuant to Rule 28, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. The petition also seeks the appointment of the Receiver pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is transferred to incapacity inactive status until further order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Peyre Thomas Lumpkin, Esquire, is hereby appointed to assume responsibility for Respondent's client files, trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts Respondent may maintain. Mr. Lumpkin shall take action as required by Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of Respondent's clients. Mr. Lumpkin may make disbursements from Respondent's trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts Respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment.

**494This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating account(s) of Respondent, shall serve as an injunction to prevent Respondent from making withdrawals from the account(s) and shall further serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that Peyre Thomas Lumpkin, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court.

Finally, this Order, when served on any office of the United States Postal Service, shall serve as notice that Peyre Thomas Lumpkin, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court and has the authority to receive Respondent's mail and the authority to direct that Respondent's mail be delivered to Mr. Lumpkin's office.

Mr. Lumpkin's appointment shall be for a period of no longer than nine months unless an extension of the period of appointment is requested.

FOR THE COURT

*/s/ Donald W. Beatty*, C. J.

Donald W. Beatty
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 531 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 531

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the allowance for 
                  burial expenses of certain veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2005

   Mr. Case (for himself, Mr. Evans, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Bradley of New 
 Hampshire, Mr. Bass, Mr. Strickland, Mr. Abercrombie, Ms. Carson, Mr. 
Farr, and Mr. Allen) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the allowance for 
                  burial expenses of certain veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State Veterans Cemetery Fairness Act 
of 2005''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE OF ALLOWANCE FOR THE PLOT ALLOWANCE OF CERTAIN 
              VETERANS.

    (a) In General.--Section 2303(b)(1)(A) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended by inserting after ``$300'' the following: ``(or, in 
the case of a State in which ground burial in a national cemetery is 
not available, the lesser of the actual costs or $750)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to deaths occurring on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 09-1114.

#### Alberto-Culver Company, Petitioner v. Sunstar, Inc., et al.

560 U.S. 906, 130 S. Ct. 3287,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1186,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3970.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 586 F.3d 487.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
consolidated  balance  sheets  and  consolidated  statements  of  income  and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           100,816
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    372,935
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                       25,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0
<PP&E>                                            50,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   551,542
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  0
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                       130,409
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     551,542
<SALES>                                          749,526
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,672,634
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    991,513
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 167,333
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  681,121
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              681,121
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     681,121
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       5.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       5.19





</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 9, 2021

No. 04-20-00596-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.J.K. AND C.A.K., CHILDREN

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI01008

Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee’s brief was originally due on October 13, 2021. Appellee has been granted one 

previous extension, until November 12, 2021. On November 4, 2021, appellee filed a second 

motion requesting a thirty-day extension of time. 

We GRANT appellee’s motion for an extension of time in which to file her brief. 

Appellee is hereby ORDERED to file her brief no later than December 13, 2021. Further 

requests for an extension of time will not be granted absent extenuating circumstances. 

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of November, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10646]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5138]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Ex Parte No. 558 (Sub-No. 12)]


Railroad Cost of Capital--2008

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of decision instituting a proceeding to determine the 
railroads' 2008 cost of capital.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board is instituting a proceeding to determine the 
railroad industry's cost of capital for 2008. The decision solicits 
comments on: (1) The railroads' 2008 current cost of debt capital; (2) 
the railroads' 2008 current cost of preferred stock equity capital (if 
any); (3) the railroads' 2008 cost of common stock equity capital; and 
(4) the 2008 capital structure mix of the railroad industry on a market 
value basis. Comments should focus on the various cost of capital 
components listed above using the same methodology followed in the Cost 
07 decision, with the exception of applying the Ex Parte No. 664 (Sub 
No. 1) decision in calculating the cost-of-equity.

DATES: Notices of intent to participate are due no later than March 20, 
2009. Statements of the railroads are due by April 20, 2009. Statements 
of other interested persons are due by May 20, 2009. Rebuttal 
statements by the railroads are due by June 19, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted either via the Board's e-filing 
format or in the traditional paper format. Any person using e-filing 
should submit a document and otherwise comply with the instructions at 
the E-FILING link on the Board's Web site, at http://www.stb.dot.gov. 
Any person submitting a filing in the traditional paper format should 
send an original and 10 copies to: Surface Transportation Board, Attn: 
STB Ex Parte No. 558 (Sub No. 12), 395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20423-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pedro Ramirez (202) 245-0333. 
[Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board's decision is posted on the 
Board's Web site, http://www.stb.dot.gov. In addition, copies of the 
decision may be purchased by contacting the office of Public 
Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and Compliance at (202)-245-0235. 
Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through FIRS at 1-800-
877-8339.
    We preliminarily conclude that the proposed action will not 
significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the 
conservation of energy resources.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 10704(a).

    Decided: March 5, 2009.

    By the Board, Chairman Nottingham, Vice Chairman Mulvey, and 
Commissioner Buttrey.
Kulunie L. Cannon,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9-5138 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
Derrick CURTIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 105617

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: February 20, 2018

Gwenda Renee Robinson, Assistant Public Defender, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Derrick Curtis appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).