alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[717 NYS2d 604]

#### In the Matter of George F. Allen, Jr. (Admitted as George Francis Allen), an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Second Department,

November 20, 2000

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Gary L. Casella,*White Plains *(Fredda Fixler-Fuchs*of counsel), for petitioner.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

On July 18, 1997, the respondent was convicted in the United *43States District Court for the Southern District of Florida of the Federal felony of money laundering, in violation of 18 USC § 1956 (a) (3) (B); (2). According to the Federal information, from approximately September 22, 1994 to January 1, 1995, the respondent, with the intent to conceal and disguise the nature, location, source, ownership, and control of property believed to be the proceeds of illegal narcotics trafficking, knowingly and willfully conducted and attempted to conduct a financial transaction affecting interstate and foreign commerce involving property, i.e., $350,000 in cash, which was represented by a person, at the direction of and with the approval of a Federal law enforcement official, to be the proceeds of illegal narcotics trafficking.

Following his plea of guilty, the respondent was sentenced to a term of probation of two years, and was directed to make restitution of $40,000 to the United States Attorney in monthly installments of $500.

The respondent was also admitted to the Bar in the State of Florida but was required to resign as a result of his Federal conviction.

The Federal crime of which the respondent was convicted satisfies the elements of money laundering in the second degree, in violation of Penal Law § 470.10, a class E felony.

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law upon his conviction of a felony.

Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. The respondent is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately.

Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Ritter, Santucci and Smith, JJ., concur.

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, George F. Allen, Jr., is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent shall comply with this Court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys *(see,*22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, George F. Allen, Jr. is commanded to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an *44attorney, or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.
STATE of North Carolina v. Bobby Davis HADDOCK, Jr.

No. COA18-923

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 16, 2019

NO PREJUDICIAL ERROR.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Granite Broadcasting Corporation (theCompany) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), we, W.Don Cornwell and Lawrence I. Wills, Chief Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section1350, as adopted pursuant section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto the best of our knowledge:

 

(i)                  theForm 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)               the information contained in theForm 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  March 31, 2005. |                    |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|
|                    |                    |
|                    | /s/                     | W. DON CORNWELL |   |
|                    | W. Don Cornwell         |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |                    |
|                    |                    |
|                    | /s/                     | LAWRENCE I. WILLS |   |
|                    | Lawrence I. Wills       |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Amtrak – Video Clip #1 (DSC 1475) (4 MB)

The video clip of about 50 seconds shows a mockup rail platform, inside a test facility. From the platform a transfer table slides out to cover about a three foot gap between the platform and a simulation rail car. The speed of the slide out slows for th e last few inches and ends a few inches from the rail car. In t he video clip , the slide out and return movement is repeated twice . The video clip was used during Amtrak’s educational presentation on the Gap Mitigation Elimination Program. The presentati on was made on April 10, 2014, during the third meeting of the Rail Vehicles Access Advisory Committee. The clip has no audible part.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 24, 2007 

132776 

DANIEL ENGLISH,

Plaintiff, 

v 

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, 

Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 SC: 132776 

 AGC: 2512/06 

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

On the order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, 

and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the 

requested relief. 

p0416 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 24, 2007 

 Clerk
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                           Code of Ethics and Conduct

                       Magnitude Information Systems, Inc.



Directors:

We will strive for timely decision making, fair pricing, and good faith
negotiations, and maintain the highest levels of competence and professionalism
in the conduct of our activities,

We will disclose all actual and potential conflicts of interest, or even the
appearance of such conflicts, prior to entering into any business discussions,
negotiations, or dealings,

We will use our best efforts to preserve the confidentiality of any proprietary
or confidential information disclosed to us and use such information strictly
for the purposes for which it was disclosed, and

Employees and Directors:

We will be truthful in all endeavors with our clients, our shareholders, and one
another,

We will deliver what we promise and stand up for what is right,

We will treat one another with dignity and respect and acknowledge the
uniqueness of each individual, and

We will voice concerns in the workplace without fear of retribution, including
violations of law, regulations and company policies, and seek clarification and
guidance whenever needed.

Approved by the Magnitude Board of Directors
December 2002
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-60758

Summary Calendar

 

JERRY LOUIS HALL; LINDA NINA HALL,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

CITY OF VICKSBURG; ET AL.,

Defendants,

WARREN COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT;

W. MARTIN Pace, Individually and in his

official capacity as Sheriff of Warren

County, Mississippi; BILLY HIGGINS, 

Individually and in his official capacity

as Sheriff of Warren County, Mississippi;

TODD DYKES, Individually and in his official

capacity as deputy sheriff of Warren County,

Mississippi,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 5:98-CV-18-BrS

--------------------

May 29, 2001

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jerry and Linda Hall appeal the district court’s summary

judgment in favor of the defendants on their claims brought under

42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Mississippi state law. The Halls failed to
No. 00-60758

-2-

present competent summary-judgment evidence in support of their

claims in the appellate record. The Halls may assert on appeal

that the evidence presented by the defendants created issues of

material fact that would preclude summary judgment. See John v.

Louisiana (Bd. of Tr. for St. Coll. and Univ.), 757 F.2d 698,

709-13 (5th Cir. 1985).

The Halls contend that the district court erred in granting

qualified immunity in favor of Deputy Billy Higgins and Deputy

Todd Dykes. They assert that the deputies acted in a “plainly

incompetent” manner by failing to assist Linda Hall in regaining

custody of her adopted daughter. At the time of the situation

and under the circumstances set forth in the defendants’ summaryjudgment evidence, the deputies’ actions were objectively

reasonable. See Spann v. Rainey, 987 F.2d 1110, 1114 (5th Cir.

1993).

Linda Hall also asserts that the deputies’ actions in

arresting her without a warrant were not objectively reasonable. 

According to the summary-judgment evidence, Dykes and Higgins

arrested Mrs. Hall after she repeatedly failed to comply with

their orders to leave the scene. Their actions in arresting her

without first seeking a warrant were objectively reasonable under

state law. See MISS CODE ANN. § 99-3-7(1).

The Halls have failed to challenge the district court’s

denial of Linda’s allegation of false imprisonment, their claims

against Sheriff W. Martin Pace in his individual capacity, the

claims against the defendants in their official capacities and

against the Warren County Sheriff’s Department, their Fifth
No. 00-60758

-3-

Amendment claims, and their state-law claims. These issues are

therefore deemed abandoned. Brinkmann v. Abner, 813 F.2d 744,

748 (5th Cir. 1987). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5263]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards

    Meeting of the Plant Operations and Fire Protection Subcommittee; 
Notice of Meeting
    The ACRS Subcommittee on Plant Operations & Fire Protection will 
hold a meeting on March 31, 2009, at 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland, Room T2-B3.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows: March 31, 
2009-8:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m.
    The Subcommittee will discuss the Safety Evaluation Report related 
to the operation of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2. The Subcommittee 
will hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of 
the NRC staff, Tennessee Valley Authority, and other interested persons 
regarding this matter. The Subcommittee will gather information, 
analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and 
actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee.
    Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or 
written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Ms. 
Maitri Banerjee (telephone 301-415-6973) five days prior to the 
meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. 
Electronic recordings will be permitted. Detailed procedures for the 
conduct of and participation in ACRS meetings were published in the 
Federal Register on October 6, 2008, (73FR 58268-58269).
    Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by 
contacting the Designated Federal Official between 7 a.m. and 4:45 p.m. 
(ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the 
above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting 
to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda.

    Dated: March 5, 2009.
Cayetano Santos,
Chief, Reactor Safety Branch A, Advisory Committee on Reactor 
Safeguards.
[FR Doc. E9-5263 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 47 (Thursday, March 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5254]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM07-10-000]


Transparency Provisions of Section 23 of the Natural Gas Act; 
Notice of Availability and eFiling Guidelines for FERC Form No. 552

Issued March 4, 2009.
    Take notice that pursuant to the requirements of Order No. 704,\1\ 
issued December 26, 2007, and Order 704-A,\2\ issued September 18, 
2008, the Commission is issuing the form, instructions, and submission 
guidelines for FERC Form No. 552, Annual Report of Natural Gas 
Transactions. The Form No. 552 report for Calendar Year 2008 is due on 
or before May 1, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Transparency Provisions of Section 23 of the Natural Gas 
Act, Order No. 704, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,260 (2007) (Final 
Rule).
    \2\ Transparency Provisions of Section 23 of the Natural Gas 
Act, Order No. 704-A, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,275 (2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Persons required to submit Form No. 552 should download the form-
fillable PDF form from the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/eforms.asp#552. This link also contains a list 
of Frequently Asked Questions and contact information for questions 
regarding completion of the form. The PDF form contains edit checks to 
assist the filer in submitting complete information.
    Once completed and saved, the PDF version of Form No. 552 PDF can 
be submitted via the Commission's electronic filing system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. After logging into the eFiling 
system, filers must make the following selections from the eFiling 
Menu: \3\

    \3\ During the eFiling process there are additional edit checks. 
All edit check issues must be resolved before the filer can upload 
the Form No. 552 and complete the submission.

Col. 1: Gas
Col. 2: Report/Form--No Docket Number
Col. 3: Form 552

Persons needing assistance or experiencing difficulty with eFiling 
should contact <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ebadaeb9a8a4858782858eb89e9b9b84999fab8d8e9988c58c849d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0a4c4f584945646663646f597f7a7a65787e4a6c6f7869246d657c">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 1-866-208-3676 (toll 
free). Be mindful that FERC Online Support cannot address content 
issues. Please e-mail content related form issues to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#95f3fae7f8a0a0a7d5f3f0e7f6bbf2fae3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f89e978a95cdcdcab89e9d8a9bd69f978e">[email protected]</span></a> 
or contact Michelle Reaux at phone number 202-502-6497.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-5254 Filed 3-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5261 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5261

   To remove the permanent tariff and the temporary duty on ethanol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 2, 2006

 Mr. Bradley of New Hampshire introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To remove the permanent tariff and the temporary duty on ethanol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ethanol Import Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF ETHANOL TARIFF AND DUTY.

    (a) Elimination of Permanent Tariff of 2.5 Percent.--Subheading 
2207.10.60 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 
amended--
            (1) by striking the column 1 general rate of duty and 
        inserting ``Free''; and
            (2) by striking the matter contained in the column 1 
        special rate of duty column and inserting ``Free''.
    (b) Repeal of Temporary Duty of 54 Cents Per Gallon.--Subchapter I 
of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 
amended--
            (1) by striking heading 9901.00.50; and
            (2) by striking U.S. Note 2.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section apply with 
respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, 
on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed November 18, 2013.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00991-CV

CARNEGIE HOMES & CONSTRUCTION, LLC AND

ARPAN GUPTA A/K/A RAM A. GUPTA, Appellants

V.

FLOOR AND DECOR OUTLETS OF AMERICA, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-04049

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices FitzGerald, Lang, and Fillmore 

Opinion by Justice Fillmore

The Court has before it appellants’ November 14, 2013 motion to dismiss the appeal. 

Appellants state that all issues between the parties have been fully and finally compromised and 

settled. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

130991F.P05

/Robert M. Fillmore/

ROBERT M. FILLMORE

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

CARNEGIE HOMES & CONSTRUCTION, 

LLC AND ARPAN GUPTA A/K/A RAM 

A. GUPTA, Appellants

No. 05-13-00991-CV V.

FLOOR AND DECOR OUTLETS OF 

AMERICA, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-04049.

Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore, 

Justices FitzGerald and Lang participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. Subject to 

any agreement between the parties, we ORDER that appellee Floor and Decor Outlets of 

America, Inc. recover its costs of this appeal, if any, from appellants Carnegie Homes & 

Construction, LLC and Arpan Gupta a/k/a Ram A. Gupta.

Judgment entered this 18th day of November, 2013.

/Robert M. Fillmore/

ROBERT M. FILLMORE

JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.1
 
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: August 23, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Nigel JamesNigel JamesPresident and Principal Executive Officer E-2
No. 09-9355.

#### Roderick Brown, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1045, 130 S. Ct. 2082,

176 L. Ed. 2d 429,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2757.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 346 Fed. Appx. 481.
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 of the SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

               In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of BioganInternational, Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2000, I, Gilles Laverdiere,Vice Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Director of Biogan International,Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge andbelief, that:

               (1)     such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year endedDecember 31, 2000, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (2)     the information contained in such Annual Report onForm 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2000, fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of BioganInternational, Inc.

Biogan International, Inc.Date: February 27, 2003

/s/ Gilles LaverdiereBy: Gilles LaverdiereVice Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director