Facility _Information facility _id utility

_code legal_owner_nam e

legl_operator_name

legal_address_type

legal_address

legal_city legal_state legal_zip 1217 4363 Corn Belt Power Cooperative Corn Belt Power Cooperative

legal owner1300 13th Street North Humboldt IA 50548

Page 1Facility _Information plant_nam e

physical_address

phyical_city

physical_state

physical_zip

ma iling_address

ma iling_city

ma iling_state

ma iling_zip Earl F W isdom

3365 165th Ave

Spencer IA 51301 3365 165th Ave Spencer IA 51301

Page 2Facility _Information RFA_small_entity

ff_fired_coal

ff_fired_oil ff_fired_ngas ff_fired_petcoke

ff_fired_other

ff_permitted_coal

ff_permitted_oil

ff_permitted_ngas Don't Know TRUE FALSE TRUE FALSE FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE

Page 3Facility _Information ff_permitted_petcoke

ff_permitted_other

deviation_reporting

continuous_emissions

cem_provided

facility _note FALSE FALSE Must report any actual/imminent/probable release of a hazardous substance. Must report all excess emissions, excluding periods of startup/shutdown/cleaning of control equipment. No Part 1 - Boiler Information:The boiler at Earl F W isdom is not equipped with a reheat cycle.Part 1 - Unit Information, Guarenteed Emission RatesEarl F W isdom has no guarenteed emission rates for any of the permitted pollutants, however, the ESP has a guarenteed collection efficiency of 96% and the Multiclone has a guarenteed collection efficiency of 86%. The Low-NOx burner manufacturer was unable to meet their guarenteed emissions rate, alternate emission limit for NOx of 0.59 lb/mmBtu.Part 2 - Fuel Shipment InformationEarl F W isdom has not received any fuel shipments in the preceding 12 calendar months.Part 2 - Test Report Emission Data, Sampling Run Fuel CompositionNo fuel sampling was done for the RATA tests.Fuel sampling was done for the PM test, but none of the selectable pollutant concentrations were analy zed.

Page 4Facility _Information Part 1 - Boiler Information:The boiler at Earl F W isdom is not equipped with a reheat cycle.Part 1 - Unit Information, Guarenteed Emission RatesEarl F W isdom has no guarenteed emission rates for any of the permitted pollutants, however, the ESP has a guarenteed collection efficiency of 96% and the Multiclone has a guarenteed collection efficiency of 86%. The Low-NOx burner manufacturer was unable to meet their guarenteed emissions rate, alternate emission limit for NOx of 0.59 lb/mmBtu.Part 2 - Fuel Shipment InformationEarl F W isdom has not received any fuel shipments in the preceding 12 calendar months.Part 2 - Test Report Emission Data, Sampling Run Fuel CompositionNo fuel sampling was done for the RATA tests.Fuel sampling was done for the PM test, but none of the selectable pollutant concentrations were analy zed.

Page 5Facility _Information Part 1 - Boiler Information:The boiler at Earl F W isdom is not equipped with a reheat cycle.Part 1 - Unit Information, Guarenteed Emission RatesEarl F W isdom has no guarenteed emission rates for any of the permitted pollutants, however, the ESP has a guarenteed collection efficiency of 96% and the Multiclone has a guarenteed collection efficiency of 86%. The Low-NOx burner manufacturer was unable to meet their guarenteed emissions rate, alternate emission limit for NOx of 0.59 lb/mmBtu.Part 2 - Fuel Shipment InformationEarl F W isdom has not received any fuel shipments in the preceding 12 calendar months.Part 2 - Test Report Emission Data, Sampling Run Fuel CompositionNo fuel sampling was done for the RATA tests.Fuel sampling was done for the PM test, but none of the selectable pollutant concentrations were analy zed.

Page 6Facility _Information Part 1 - Boiler Information:The boiler at Earl F W isdom is not equipped with a reheat cycle.Part 1 - Unit Information, Guarenteed Emission RatesEarl F W isdom has no guarenteed emission rates for any of the permitted pollutants, however, the ESP has a guarenteed collection efficiency of 96% and the Multiclone has a guarenteed collection efficiency of 86%. The Low-NOx burner manufacturer was unable to meet their guarenteed emissions rate, alternate emission limit for NOx of 0.59 lb/mmBtu.Part 2 - Fuel Shipment InformationEarl F W isdom has not received any fuel shipments in the preceding 12 calendar months.Part 2 - Test Report Emission Data, Sampling Run Fuel CompositionNo fuel sampling was done for the RATA tests.Fuel sampling was done for the PM test, but none of the selectable pollutant concentrations were analy zed.

Page 7Facility _Information Part 1 - Boiler Information:The boiler at Earl F W isdom is not equipped with a reheat cycle.Part 1 - Unit Information, Guarenteed Emission RatesEarl F W isdom has no guarenteed emission rates for any of the permitted pollutants, however, the ESP has a guarenteed collection efficiency of 96% and the Multiclone has a guarenteed collection efficiency of 86%. The Low-NOx burner manufacturer was unable to meet their guarenteed emissions rate, alternate emission limit for NOx of 0.59 lb/mmBtu.Part 2 - Fuel Shipment InformationEarl F W isdom has not received any fuel shipments in the preceding 12 calendar months.Part 2 - Test Report Emission Data, Sampling Run Fuel CompositionNo fuel sampling was done for the RATA tests.Fuel sampling was done for the PM test, but none of the selectable pollutant concentrations were analy zed.

Page 8Facility _Information Part 1 - Boiler Information:The boiler at Earl F W isdom is not equipped with a reheat cycle.Part 1 - Unit Information, Guarenteed Emission RatesEarl F W isdom has no guarenteed emission rates for any of the permitted pollutants, however, the ESP has a guarenteed collection efficiency of 96% and the Multiclone has a guarenteed collection efficiency of 86%. The Low-NOx burner manufacturer was unable to meet their guarenteed emissions rate, alternate emission limit for NOx of 0.59 lb/mmBtu.Part 2 - Fuel Shipment InformationEarl F W isdom has not received any fuel shipments in the preceding 12 calendar months.Part 2 - Test Report Emission Data, Sampling Run Fuel CompositionNo fuel sampling was done for the RATA tests.Fuel sampling was done for the PM test, but none of the selectable pollutant concentrations were analy zed.

Page 9Facility _Information Part 1 - Boiler Information:The boiler at Earl F W isdom is not equipped with a reheat cycle.Part 1 - Unit Information, Guarenteed Emission RatesEarl F W isdom has no guarenteed emission rates for any of the permitted pollutants, however, the ESP has a guarenteed collection efficiency of 96% and the Multiclone has a guarenteed collection efficiency of 86%. The Low-NOx burner manufacturer was unable to meet their guarenteed emissions rate, alternate emission limit for NOx of 0.59 lb/mmBtu.Part 2 - Fuel Shipment InformationEarl F W isdom has not received any fuel shipments in the preceding 12 calendar months.Part 2 - Test Report Emission Data, Sampling Run Fuel CompositionNo fuel sampling was done for the RATA tests.Fuel sampling was done for the PM test, but none of the selectable pollutant concentrations were analy zed.

Page 10Facility _Information Part 1 - Boiler Information:The boiler at Earl F W isdom is not equipped with a reheat cycle.Part 1 - Unit Information, Guarenteed Emission RatesEarl F W isdom has no guarenteed emission rates for any of the permitted pollutants, however, the ESP has a guarenteed collection efficiency of 96% and the Multiclone has a guarenteed collection efficiency of 86%. The Low-NOx burner manufacturer was unable to meet their guarenteed emissions rate, alternate emission limit for NOx of 0.59 lb/mmBtu.Part 2 - Fuel Shipment InformationEarl F W isdom has not received any fuel shipments in the preceding 12 calendar months.Part 2 - Test Report Emission Data, Sampling Run Fuel CompositionNo fuel sampling was done for the RATA tests.Fuel sampling was done for the PM test, but none of the selectable pollutant concentrations were analy zed.

Page 11Facility _Information Part 1 - Boiler Information:The boiler at Earl F W isdom is not equipped with a reheat cycle.Part 1 - Unit Information, Guarenteed Emission RatesEarl F W isdom has no guarenteed emission rates for any of the permitted pollutants, however, the ESP has a guarenteed collection efficiency of 96% and the Multiclone has a guarenteed collection efficiency of 86%. The Low-NOx burner manufacturer was unable to meet their guarenteed emissions rate, alternate emission limit for NOx of 0.59 lb/mmBtu.Part 2 - Fuel Shipment InformationEarl F W isdom has not received any fuel shipments in the preceding 12 calendar months.Part 2 - Test Report Emission Data, Sampling Run Fuel CompositionNo fuel sampling was done for the RATA tests.Fuel sampling was done for the PM test, but none of the selectable pollutant concentrations were analy zed.

Page 12Facility _Information Part 1 - Boiler Information:The boiler at Earl F W isdom is not equipped with a reheat cycle.Part 1 - Unit Information, Guarenteed Emission RatesEarl F W isdom has no guarenteed emission rates for any of the permitted pollutants, however, the ESP has a guarenteed collection efficiency of 96% and the Multiclone has a guarenteed collection efficiency of 86%. The Low-NOx burner manufacturer was unable to meet their guarenteed emissions rate, alternate emission limit for NOx of 0.59 lb/mmBtu.Part 2 - Fuel Shipment InformationEarl F W isdom has not received any fuel shipments in the preceding 12 calendar months.Part 2 - Test Report Emission Data, Sampling Run Fuel CompositionNo fuel sampling was done for the RATA tests.Fuel sampling was done for the PM test, but none of the selectable pollutant concentrations were analy zed.

Page 13facility _contacts facility _id contact_id contact_title contact_name

contact_phone1

contact_phone2

contact_email

contact_primary 1217 1 VP Generation Mike Thatcher

51533225717775 mi ke.thatcher@cbpower.coop TRUE 1217 3 Project Engineer I Jake Olberding

51533225717706 jacob.olberding@cbpower.coop FALSE

Page 14facility _coal_utilized facility _id coal_type percentage_mass percentage_btu

synfuel_type

coal_note 1217 bitum inous 100 100

Page 15facility _oil_utilized facility _id oil_type percentage_volume percentage_btu

other_type

Page 16facility _other_materials facility _id other_material

permitted_burn

actually _burn other_quantity

other_quantity

_units other_note rcra_utilize rcra_explain

Page 17facility _other_materials rcra_explain

Page 18boiler_information

facility _id boiler_id boiler_type boiler_other bottom_design

design_fuelheat_input max_heat_input MWe_capacity 1217 1 Wall firing - front firing Dry Bottom coal 418.3 477 40

Page 19boiler_information

MWe_net_capacity

design_gross_efficiency

operating_gross_efficiency

design_pressure

operating_pressure

design_temp

operating_temp

design_reheat_multiple

design_reheat_temp1 37.5 85.1 84.39 875 850 905 905 FALSE

Page 20boiler_information

design_reheat_temp2

operating_reheat_multiple

operating_reheat_temp1

operating_reheat_temp2

hours_operated

vg_capacity

_factor applicable_NSPS

retirement_year

retirement_year_CBI FALSE 2719 15.5 N FALSE

Page 21boiler_information

NOx_control

SO2_control

combustion_additives Yes No No

Page 22boiler_fuels

facility _id boiler_id fuel_type fuel_year percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_type 1217 1 coal - bituminous2007 94.97 96.21 1217 1 coal - bituminous2008 100 100 1217 1 coal - bituminous2009 100 100 1217 1 coal - subbituminous 2007 5.03 3.79

Page 23boiler_control_NOx

facility _id boiler_id NOx_type NOx_other NOx_online 1217 1 Low NOx Burner 7/1/1999

Page 24boiler_control_SO2

facility _id boiler_id SO2_type SO2_other SO2_online

Page 25boiler_additives

facility _id boiler_id boiler_additive additive_other

additive_online

Page 26facility _units facility _id unit_id 1217 1

Page 27unit_boilers

facility _id unit_id boiler_id 1217 1 1

Page 28facility _controls facility _id control_id control_group control_type

control_other

legacy _control cntrol_online

control_offline

NOx_reagent 1217 ESP PM control Electrostatic precipitator, cold side, w/o flue gas conditioning FALSE 7/1/1975 1217 Multiclone PM control Multiple cyclone FALSE 4/1/1960

Page 29facility _controls reagent_other

NOx_ammonia

SO2_sorbent

oher_sorbent

SO2_scrubber_additive

Page 30facility _sampling_ports facility _id sampling_port_id 1217 Sam ple Port

Page 31facility _stacks facility _id stack_id stack_height stack_diameter

sack_gas_velocity 1217 Stack 148 8 59.35

Page 32configurations

facility _id configuration_id 1217 1

Page 33configuration_components

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

order component_type port_near 1217 1 1 1 Unit 1217 1 ESP 3 PM control 1217 1 Multiclone 2 PM control 1217 1 Sam ple Port 4 Sam pling Port pevious 1217 1 Stack 5 Stack

Page 34configuration_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

pollutant_nam e

permit_type_1

em lim it_1 em lim it_units_1 avg_period_1

em lim it_2 em lim it_units_2 1217 1 PM (Filterable) Fderal - Title V Operating Permit

0.6 pound per hour (lb/hr)

Continuous 1217 1 PM10 (Filterable) Fedral - Title V Operating Permit

251 pound per hour (lb/hr)

Continuous 1217 1 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) Federal - Title V Operating Permit

0.59 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

Annual Ave

Page 35configuration_pollutants1

avg_period_2

em lim it_3 em lim it_units_3 avg_period_3

em lim it_4 em lim it_units_4 avg_period_4

em lim it_details

test_method Iowa Com pliance Sam pling Manual Method 5 EPA Test Method 201a and 202

Page 36configuration_pollutants1

em rate em rate_units guarantee_level

_explain

req_monitoring

eq_recordkeeping

req_reporting Iowa Com pliance Sam pling Manual Method 5 Stack Test Title V Section IV G30 567 IAC 22.108(3) EPA Test Method 201a and 202 Stack Test Title V Section IV G30 567 IAC 22.108(3) CEMS 40 CFR 75 40 CFR 75

Page 37control_technologies

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id project_titleproject_type vendor_name

vndor_contact

vendor_phone

Page 38control_technologies

vendor_address

vndor_city

vendor_state

vendor_zip actual_start_date projected_start_date

end_date sorbent chemical_additive

Page 39control_technologies

injection_point

HAP_em ission_reduction

HAP_em ission_rate

HAP_em ission_rate_units

HAP_achieved_reduction

HAP_achieved_rate

HAP_achieved_rate_units

feed_rate feed_rate_units

Page 40control_technologies feed_rate_units

Page 41control_coal_ranks

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id coal_type

Page 42control_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id pollutant_nam e

Page 43control_costs

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id boiler_retrofit boiler_new_install

total_capital_investm ent

total_operating_costs

base_year

Page 44control_costs

CBI

Page 45misc_controls

facility _id misc_control_id

control_description

Page 46misc_control_configurations

facility _id misc_control_id

configuration_id

Page 47fuel_shipments

facility _id shipment_id

shipment_date

am ount_received

am ount_units

fuel_type state_country other_country

county

Page 48fuel_shipments

coal_seam shipment_method

Page 49fuel_shipment_configurations

facility _id shipment_id

configuration_id

Page 50fuel_shipment_samples

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id am ount_fuel am ount_fuel_units

total_sulfur ash_content heating_value

hating_units

Page 51fuel_shipment_samples

chlorine chlorine_units fluorine fluorine_units data_provided

data_other_specified

supplier_type

supplier_name

supplier_address

Page 52fuel_shipment_samples

supplier_city

supplier_state

supplier_zip

lab_nam e lab_address lab_city lab_state lab_zip analysis_copies

Page 53fuel_shipment_samples analysis_copies

Page 54fuel_sample_pollutants

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id fuel_pollutant pollutant_conc

pollutant_conc_units

pollutant_conc_ND

pollutant_conc_MDL

Page 55test_reports

facility _id report_id report_type other_type report_description report_begin_date

report_end_date

before_control

during_deviation 1217 2005 RATA

compliance 2005 CEMS RATA data (SO2 and NOx) 3/18/2005 No No 1217 2006 RATA

compliance 2006 CEMS RATA data (SO2 and NOx) 3/23/2006 No No 1217 2006 Stack (PM)

compliance 2006 stack testing for PM emissions 6/13/2006 6/14/2006 No No 1217 2007 RATA

compliance 2007 CEMS RATA data (SO2 and NOx) 6/26/2007 No No 1217 2007 Stack (Hg)

other Self-Assurance 2007 stack testing for Hg emissions

6/26/2007 No No 1217 2008 RATA

compliance 2008 CEMS RATA data (SO2 and NOx) 6/17/2008 No No 1217 2008 Stack (PM)

compliance 2008 stack testing for PM emissions 6/17/2008 No No 1217 2009 RATA

compliance 2009 CEMS RATA data (SO2 and NOx) 6/17/2009 No No 1217 2009 Stack (Hg)

other Self-Assurance 2007 stack testing for Hg emissions

6/17/2009 No No

Page 56test_reports

deviation_reports No No No No No No No No No

Page 57test_report_configurations

facility _id report_id configuration_id 1217 2005 RATA1 1217 2006 RATA1 1217 2006 Stack (PM)

1 1217 2007 RATA1 1217 2007 Stack (Hg)

1 1217 2008 RATA1 1217 2008 Stack (PM)

1 1217 2009 RATA1 1217 2009 Stack (Hg)

1

Page 58test_report_fuels

facility _id report_id fuel_id 1217 2005 RATA

Coal 1217 2006 RATA

Coal 1217 2006 Stack (PM)

Coal 1217 2007 RATA

Coal 1217 2007 Stack (Hg)

Coal 1217 2008 RATA

Coal 1217 2008 Stack (PM)

Coal 1217 2009 RATA

Coal 1217 2009 Stack (Hg)

Coal

Page 59test_report_fuel_types

facility _id report_id fuel_id fuel_type percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_type 1217 2005 RATA

Coal coal - bituminous 100 100 1217 2006 RATA

Coal coal - bituminous 100 100 1217 2006 Stack (PM)

Coal coal - bituminous 100 100 1217 2007 RATA

Coal coal - bituminous 100 100 1217 2007 Stack (Hg)

Coal coal - bituminous 100 100 1217 2008 RATA

Coal coal - bituminous 100 100 1217 2008 Stack (PM)

Coal coal - bituminous 100 100 1217 2009 RATA

Coal coal - bituminous 100 100 1217 2009 Stack (Hg)

Coal coal - bituminous 100 100

Page 60cem_data

facility _id tim e_period

cem_period_description

Page 61cem_data_pollutants1

facility _id tim e_period

pollutant_nam e

Page 62test_report_sampling

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id point_differ point_description befre_SO2_device

point_orientation

normal_bypass_percent

testing_bypass_percent 1217 2005 RATA

Sam ple Port

No No 1217 2006 RATA

Sam ple Port

No No 1217 2006 Stack (PM)

Sam ple Port

No No 1217 2007 RATA

Sam ple Port

No No 1217 2007 Stack (Hg)

Sam ple Port

No No 1217 2008 RATA

Sam ple Port

No No 1217 2008 Stack (PM)

Sam ple Port

No No 1217 2009 RATA

Sam ple Port

No No 1217 2009 Stack (Hg)

Sam ple Port

No No

Page 63test_report_sampling

fg_fraction

Page 64sampling_runs

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id start_datetime end_datetim e

unit_load net_generation fg_moisture_content 1217 2005 RATA

Sam ple Port

average 3/18/2005 3/18/2005 1217 2006 RATA

Sam ple Port

average 3/23/2006 3/23/2006 1217 2006 Stack (PM)

Sam ple Port

average 6/13/2006 6/14/2006 7.13 1217 2007 RATA

Sam ple Port

average 6/26/2007 6/26/2007 1217 2007 Stack (Hg)

Sam ple Port

average 6/26/2007 6/26/2007 1217 2008 RATA

Sam ple Port

average 6/17/2008 6/17/2008 1217 2008 Stack (PM)

Sam ple Port

average 6/17/2008 6/17/2008 7.77 1217 2009 RATA

Sam ple Port

average 6/17/2009 6/17/2009 1217 2009 Stack (Hg)

Sam ple Port

average 6/17/2009 6/17/2009

Page 65sampling_runs

fg_flow_rate

fg_flow_rate_units

standard_temperature

standard_pressure

normal_temperature

normal_pressure

fg_oxygen_content

fg_CO2_content

fg_temperature 121894 dscfm 4.9 14.7 107498 dscfm 5.1 13.4 118143.7 dscfm 68.33 1 4.13 13.03 99095 dscfm 5.67 15.23

Page 66sampling_runs

fg_pressure

Hg_loi test_method run_comments

fuel_id fuel_unit_load fuel_flow_rate

fuel_ash fuel_heating_value EPA Method 6C/7E Coal EPA Method 6C/7A EPA Method 5/202 Coal 6.56 13289 EPA Method 6C/7A EPA Method 101A Coal 7.26 13504 EPA Method 6C/7A EPA m ethod 5/202 Coal 7.56 13206 EPA Method 6C/7A EPA Method 101A Coal 7.48 13449

Page 67sampling_runs

fuel_sulfur 1.82 1.73 1.52 1.63

Page 68sampling_run_pollutants1

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id pollutant_nam e conc conc_units conc_ND conc_MDL 1217 2008 RATA

Sam ple Port

average Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) FALSE 1217 2008 RATA

Sam ple Port

average Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) 1028.69 FALSE 1217 2009 RATA

Sam ple Port

average Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) FALSE 1217 2009 RATA

Sam ple Port

average Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) 970.17 FALSE 1217 2008 Stack (PM)

Sam ple Port

average Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) 0.065 FALSE 1217 2005 RATA

Sam ple Port

average Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) FALSE 1217 2005 RATA

Sam ple Port

average Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) 837 FALSE 1217 2006 RATA

Sam ple Port

average Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) FALSE 1217 2006 RATA

Sam ple Port

average Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) FALSE 1217 2007 RATA

Sam ple Port

average Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) FALSE 1217 2007 RATA

Sam ple Port

average Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) 893.73 FALSE 1217 2006 Stack (PM)

Sam ple Port

average Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) 0.0637 FALSE 1217 2007 Stack (Hg)

Sam ple Port

average Total Mercury (Hgt) 1.74E-06 FALSE 1217 2009 Stack (Hg)

Sam ple Port

average Total Mercury (Hgt) 1.5E-06 FALSE

Page 69sampling_run_pollutants1

em ission_rate

em ission_rate_units

em ission_rate_ND

em ission_rate_MDL

em ission_factor

em ission_factor_units

em ission_factor_ND

em ission_factor_MDL

run_pollutant_comment FALSE 0.8068 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE FALSE FALSE SO2 Concentration in units of ppm (wet) FALSE 0.8323 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE FALSE FALSE SO2 Concentration units of ppm (wet) 65.35 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.113 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE TSP Concentration is in units of gr/dscf FALSE 0.85 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE FALSE FALSE SO2 Concentration is in units of ppm (wet) FALSE 0.76 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE FALSE 2.1 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE FALSE 0.9348 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE FALSE FALSE SO2 Concentration in units of ppm (wet) 66.499 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0158 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE TSP Concentration is in units of gr/dscf 0.0016 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE Hgt Concentration is in units of gr/dscf 0.0013 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE Hgt Concentration is in units of gr/dscf

Page 70sampling_run_pollutants1 run_pollutant_comment SO2 Concentration in units of ppm (wet) SO2 Concentration units of ppm (wet) TSP Concentration is in units of gr/dscf SO2 Concentration is in units of ppm (wet) SO2 Concentration in units of ppm (wet) TSP Concentration is in units of gr/dscf Hgt Concentration is in units of gr/dscf Hgt Concentration is in units of gr/dscf

Page 71sampling_run_fuel

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id fuel_pollutant fuel_conc fuel_conc_units fuel_conc_ND

fuel_conc_MDL 1217 2007 Stack (Hg)

Sam ple Port

average Mercury

(Hg) 0.045 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1217 2009 Stack (Hg)

Sam ple Port

average Mercury

(Hg) 0.103 microgram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE

Page 72sampling_run_fuel fuel_conc_MDL

Page 73