alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
 
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: August 21, 2008
    By:

/s/ Nigel JamesNigel JamesPresident and Principal Executive Officer E-2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Income Partners 1988-A, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         1,993
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  169,919
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               171,912
<PP&E>                                         10,166,768
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,370,458)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,977,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          256,404
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,685,365
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,977,585
<SALES>                                        790,957
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               797,491
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  561,961<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                106,525
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            106,525
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   106,525
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation, 
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and 
interest expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
In the MATTER OF the Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust executed by Wendy S. STEPHENS and Mark T. Stephens in the original amount of $154,800.00 dated August 10, 2005, recorded in Book 11562, Page 2594, Wake County Registry

No. COA18-1058

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 20, 2019

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5224 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5224

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 350 Uinta Drive in Green River, Wyoming, as the ``Curt Gowdy Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CURT GOWDY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 350 Uinta Drive in Green River, Wyoming, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Curt Gowdy Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Curt Gowdy 
Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 25, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5224

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 350 Uinta Drive in Green River, Wyoming, as the ``Curt Gowdy Post 
                           Office Building''.
```
No. 09-1160.

#### JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Petitioner v. Andrew Whalen.

559 U.S. 1107, 130 S. Ct. 2416,

176 L. Ed. 2d 925,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3683.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 587 F.3d 529.
Exhibit  31
                                  CERTIFICATION

I,  Hideyuki  Shiraishi,  certify  that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Amanasu
Technologies  Corporation;

2.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  report  does  not  contain  any  untrue
statement  of  a  material  fact  necessary  to  make  the  statements  made, in
light  of  the  circumstances  under  which  such  statements  were  made,  not
misleading  with  respect  to  the  period  covered  by  this  report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other
financial  information  included  in  this  report,  fairly  present  in  all
material  respects  the  financial  condition,  results  of  operations  and
cash  flows  of  the  registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented
in  this  quarterly  report;

4.  I  am  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure
controls  and  procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e))  for  the  registrant  and  we  have:

a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or  caused  such
disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed under my supervision, to
ensure  that  material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,  including
its  consolidated  subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to  us  by  others  within
those  entities,  particularly  during  the  period  in  which  this  report  is
being  prepared;

b)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's  disclosure  controls
and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  my  conclusions  about  the
effectiveness  of  the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such  evaluation;  and

c)  Disclosed  in  this  report  any change in the registrant's internal control
over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the registrant's most recent
fiscal  quarter  that  has  materially  affected,  or  is  reasonably  likely to
materially  affect,  the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  I  have  disclosed,  based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation,  to  the
registrant's  auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of  registrant's  board  of
directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent  function):


a)  All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weakness  in  the  design  or
operation  of  internal  control  over financial reporting  which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize  and  report  financial  data;  and

b)  Any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves  management  or
other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the  registrant's
internal  controls  over  financial  reporting.


Date:  November 15, 2004

/s/ Hideyuki  Shiraishi
Hideyuki  Shiraishi
CEO,  CFO,  CAO
EPA Registration Jacket 84229‐14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
32
33
34
35

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
36
37

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
38
39
40
41
The product confidential statement of formula on page 42 is not included in this copy.
43

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
In the MATTER OF: C.M. and C.M.

No. COA18-1077

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 16, 2019

VACATED. REMANDED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5145 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5145

   To authorize the National War Dogs Monument, Inc. to establish a 
       national monument in honor of military working dog teams.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2006

 Mr. Jones of North Carolina (for himself and Mr. Delahunt) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the National War Dogs Monument, Inc. to establish a 
       national monument in honor of military working dog teams.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL MILITARY WORKING DOG TEAMS MONUMENT.

    (a) Authority to Establish Monument.--The National War Dogs 
Monument, Inc. is authorized to establish in the District of Columbia, 
a monument to honor the sacrifice and service of United States Armed 
Forces working dog teams that participate in the military endeavors of 
the United States.
    (b) Location.--The monument shall be located within the area that 
is referred to as Area II in section 8908 of title 40, United States 
Code.
    (c) Compliance With Standards for Commemorative Works Act.--The 
establishment of the monument shall be in accordance with chapter 89 of 
title 40, United States Code, except as provided in subsection (b).
    (d) Limitation on Payment of Expenses.--The United States 
Government shall not pay any expense for the establishment or 
maintenance of the monument.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Montrez Benjamin WILLIAMS

No. 233PA12-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2019

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Kathryn L. VandenBerg, Assistant Appellant Defender, for Williams, Montrez Benjamin.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 4th of October 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 15th of October 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
No. 85-6726.

#### Allen *v.*Gilmore et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
F ILED U.S. COURT O F APP EALS EL EV EN TH C IRC UIT July 10, 20 08 T HOMA S K. KA HN CLERK [DO N OT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ N o. 08- 1063 2 Non-A rgum ent Calendar

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ D. C. Dock etNo. 0 6- 61 90 6- CV-MGC KARI A. SCHABO, Pl ai nti ff -Appe llant,

ve rs us GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COM PANY, De fendant-Appellee.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ O n Appe al f

ro m the U nit ed

S ta te s D istri ct

Co urt fo r the S outhe rnD istri ct

of F lor ida

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ (J ul y 10 , 200 8) Be fo re T JO FL A T , CA RN E S an d B A RKE T T , Ci rc uit Jud ge s. PE R CU RIA M:2

T he pla int if

f in this div er sity

c as e, w hic h w as r em ove d to the dis tr ic t c ourt, seeks a declar ation that sh e is entitled to un insured m otorist cov erage for inj uries sus ta ine d inan auto m obi le a cc ide nt w itha n un ins ur ed m oto ri st. T he de fe ndant has denied such cov erage. O n cross m otion s for sum m ary j udgm ent, the district court found, in an order entere d on Janu ary 18, 2008, that plaintiff was not entitled to unin sur ed

m oto ri st c ove ra ge be ca

use the “pr im ar

y ins ur ed kno w ing ly

a nd lawf ully wa ived uni nsured m otorist cov erage, and then added [plainti ff] and her vehicle to that pol icy

without changin g is m aterial te rm s.” The c ourt therefore gr an te d de fe ndant s um

m ar y j udgm en t. Pl ai nti ff appe al s. W e ag re e, f

or the r ea sons the dis tr ic t c ourt art ic ulate d in its January

18 o rd er , that pl ai nti ff

is not e nti tle d to the uni nsur ed c ove ra ge she se ek s. AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 3.7

CERTIFICATEFOR RENEWAL AND REVIVALOFCERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATIONOFBIOGAN INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Under Section 312 of the GeneralCorporation Law of the State of Delaware

        BIOGAN INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Corporation organized under the GeneralCorporation Law of the State of Delaware, the Certificate of Incorporation ofwhich was filed in the office of the Secretary of State on February 5, 1988 andwas subsequently voided for non-payment of taxes, now desires to procure arestoration, renewal and revival of its Certificate of Incorporation, and herebycertifies as follows: 

        1.    The name of this corporation is BIOGAN INTERNATIONAL, INC. (the"Corporation"). 

        2.    The registered office of the corporation in the State of Delaware islocated at 1209 Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle,and the name of its registered agent at such address is The Corporation TrustCompany.

        3.    The date when the restoration, renewal and revival of the Certificate ofIncorporation of the corporation is to commence is February 28, 2002, the samebeing prior to the date the Certificate of Incorporation became void. Thisrenewal and revival of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is tobe perpetual. 

        4.    The Corporation was duly organized under the General Corporation Law ofthe State of Delaware and carried on the business authorized by its Certificateof Incorporation until March 1, 2002, at which time its Certificate ofIncorporation became inoperative and void for non-payment of taxes, and thisCertificate for Renewal and Revival is filed by authority of the duly electeddirectors of the Corporation in accordance with the General Corporation Law ofthe State of Delaware.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this certificate to be signedJoseph P. Galda, its last and acting Secretary this 23rd day of May,2002. 

                                                                                                                                     By: /s/ Joseph P. Galda                                                                                                                                     Joseph P. Galda                                                                                                                                      Last and Acting Secretary
SAVINO v. The CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, et al.

18PA19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 16, 2019

Robert R. Marcus, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority d/b/a Carolinas Healthcare System and CMCNortheast.

Kimberly Sullivan, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority d/b/a Carolinas Healthcare System and CMCNortheast.

R. Kent Brown, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Savino, Anthony Lawrence (The Estate of).

Jon Ryan Moore, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Savino, Anthony Lawrence (The Estate of).

Paige L. Pahlke, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Savino, Anthony Lawrence (The Estate of).

Robert E. Zaytoun, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Savino, Anthony Lawrence (The Estate of).

Matthew D. Ballew, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Savino, Anthony Lawrence (The Estate of).

John R. Taylor, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

Matthew W. Krueger-Andes, Attorney at Law, Charlotte.

Matthew Nis Leerberg, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority d/b/a Carolinas Healthcare System and CMC-Northeast.

Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Trisha S. Pande, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Brian M. Rowlson, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority d/b/a Carolinas Healthcare System and CMCNortheast.

Jonathan E. Schulz, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority d/b/a Carolinas Healthcare System and CMC-Northeast.

Narendra K. Ghosh, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

*846The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 15th of August 2019 by Defendants:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of August 2019."

Defendants shall have up to and including the 18th day of September 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.

Davis, J. recused
ACCARDI v. HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY

42A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 15, 2019

Daniel K. Bryson, Attorney at Law, J. Hunter Bryson, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Accardi, Thomas.

Stephen D. Feldman, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Kim E. Rinehart, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, David R. Roth, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company.

Mark R. Sigmon, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for United Policyholders.

Roger A. Peters, II, Attorney at Law, for American Property Casualty Insurance Association.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th of May 2019 by Gary M. Klinger for Admission Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of May 2019."
STATE of North Carolina v. Lamarquis Letron SMALLWOOD

No. 171P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Jarvis John Edgerton, IV, Attorney at Law, Lamarquis Letron Smallwood, For Smallwood, Lamarquis Letron.

Lewis Lamar, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Seth H. Edwards, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th of May 2019 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 38870

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff-Respondent

,

v.

CORY R. HOLTAN

,

Defendant-Appellant

. )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 2012 Unpublished Opinion No. 344

Filed: February 1, 2012

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Darla S. Willia mson , District Judge.

Order denying Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for reduction of

sentence, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas , State Appellate Public Defender; Diane M. Walker, Deputy

Appellate Public Defender, Bo ise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney

General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Cory R. Holtan pled guilty to failure to register as a sex offender. Idaho Code § 18

- 8309.

The district court sentenced Holtan to a unified term of ten years, with one year determinate

.

Holtan filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion, which the district court denied. Holtan appeals.

A motion for reducti on of sentence under Idaho Criminal Rule 35 is e ssentially a plea for

leniency, addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton , 143 Idaho 318, 319,

144 P.3d 23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee , 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In

presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defen dant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of

new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the

motion. State v. Huffman , 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the2 record, inclu ding the new information submitted with Holtan’s Rule 35 motion, we conclude no

abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court’s order denying Holtan’s Rule

35 motion is affirmed.