alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Terra Nostra Resources Corp.  (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sun Liu James Po, President and Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  October 22, 2007

By:  /s/ Sun Liu James Po

Name:  Sun Liu James Po

Title:    President (Principal Executive Officer)
Jonathan BRUNSON v. OFFICE OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIARY

No. 155P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019.

Jonathan E. Brunson, for Brunson, Jonathan.

Jessica B. Helms, Associate Attorney General, for Office of the Twelfth Judiciary.

Barry H. Bloch, Assistant Attorney General, for Office of the Twelfth Judiciary.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 29th of April 2019 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
No. 09-9964.

#### Danny Daniels, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1114, 130 S. Ct. 2424,

176 L. Ed. 2d 938,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3847.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 588 F.3d 835.
s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 19, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00452

- CV

Mark HART and Angelica Hart,

Appella nt

v.

FLAGSHIP HOMES, LTD. d/b/a/ Prestige Homes,

Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 04333

Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding

No. 04

- 14

- 00568

- CV

Julian CALDERAS

, Jr. and Erica Calderas,

Appellants

v.

FLAGSHIP HOMES, LTD. d/b/a Prestige Homes,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 04330

Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding

No. 04

- 14

- 00597

- CV

Thomas H. VEI TCH and Anne Veitch,

Appellants

v. FLAGSHIP HOMES, LTD. d/b/a/ Prestige Homes,

Appellee

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 04337Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellants' first unopposed motion for extension of time to file reply brief is hereby

GRANTED. Time is extended to December 1, 2014.

It is so ORDERED on November 19, 2014.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Wells Real Estate Fund III, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the
undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Leo F. Wells, III  
|Leo F. Wells, III      
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 23, 2009         



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Douglas P. Williams
|Douglas P. Williams    
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 23, 2009
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Joseph B. Roe, Jr., * From the 142nd District Court

of Midland County,

 Trial Court No. CV-52,446.

Vs. No. 11-17-00294-CV * November 7, 2019

Mike McQuitty, David Decker, and * Memorandum Opinion by Stretcher, J.

and C. Boyd Finch, (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

 Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

 sitting by assignment) 

 (Willson, J., not participating)

 

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by 

reason of this appeal are taxed against Joseph B. Roe, Jr.
exhibit10_5.htm




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE


 


FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO., INC.


 


NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


 


WHEREAS, Franklin Electric Co., Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Franklin Electric Co., Inc. Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) for its nonemployee directors; and


 


WHEREAS, the Company has reserved the right to amend the Plan and now deems it appropriate to do so.


 


NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of February 19, 2010, by revising Section 2.1 of the Plan to read as follows:


 


2.1           Number of Shares.  Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 2.2 herein, the total number of shares of common stock of the Company (“Common Stock”) available for issuance under the Plan shall be 100,000 shares.  Such shares of Common Stock may be either authorized but unissued, reacquired or a combination thereof.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment has been duly executed as of this 19th day of February, 2010.


 


FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO., INC.

















By:                                                                           


John J. Haines


Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and


    Secretary







CH2\8370886.1
```

[Federal Register: September 9, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 174)]
[Notices]               
[Page 54874-54875]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr09se10-55]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 2010-0035]

 
Agency Information Collection Activities: Final Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

[[Page 54875]]

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and comments request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: Application for Short-Term Express Export Credit 
Insurance Policy.

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a 
part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent 
burden, invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to 
comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The Application for Short-Term Express Export Credit Insurance 
Policy will be used to determine the eligibility of the applicant and 
the transaction for Export-Import Bank assistance under its insurance 
program. Export-Import Bank customers will be able to submit this form 
on paper or electronically.
    This is a new application form for use by small U.S. businesses 
with limited export experience. Companies that are eligible to use the 
Express policy will need to answer approximately 20 questions and sign 
an acknowledgement of the certifications that appear on the reverse of 
the application form. This program does not provide discretionary 
credit authority to the U.S. exporter, and therefore the financial and 
credit information needs are minimized. This new form incorporates the 
recently updated standard Certification and Notices section as well as 
two questions about the amount of U.S. employment to be supported by 
this policy.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before November 8, 2010 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments maybe submitted electronically on http://www.regulations.gov or by mail to Michele Kuester, Export-Import Bank 
of the United States, 811 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20571.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Titles and Form Number: EIB 10-02 Application for Short-Term 
Express Export Credit Insurance Policy.
    OMB Number: 3048-xxxx.
    Type of Review: New.
    Need and Use: The Application for Short-Term Express Export Credit 
Insurance Policy will be used to determine the eligibility of the 
applicant and the transaction for Export-Import Bank assistance under 
its insurance program.
    Annual Number of Respondents: 500.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 75 hours.
    Government Annual Burden Hours: 50 hours.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: Once.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-22412 Filed 9-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Norfolk Junior BEST

No. 300A93-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, Jon David, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

Michael Unti, Raleigh, Jay H. Ferguson, Durham, Erica W. Washington, Attorneys at Law, For Best, Norfolk Junior.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 24th of July 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Bladen County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

Ervin, J. recused
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5107 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5107

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 1400 West Jordan Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ``Earl D. Hutto 
                         Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1400 
West Jordan Street in Pensacola, Florida, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Earl D. Hutto Post Office Building''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Earl D. Hutto Post Office 
Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
file:///J|/SNURS/SNUR%20Batch%20FY10-3/sanitized%20report/sanitized%20engineering%20reports/p080754.sanitized.en1.txt [5/11/2010 1:13:27 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 08-0754 Post-Focus Draft Revision 1 11/4/2008 (sanitized 12/14/2009) ENGINEER: Austin \ AH PV (kg/yr): 2,500 Revision Notes / Assessment Overview: SUBMITTER: 3M USE: OTHER USES: MSDS: Yes Label: No Gen Eqpt: indirect vented goggles, butyl rubber or nitrile rubber gloves, protective clothing Respirator: airborne exposures are not expected to be significant enough to require respiratory protection under normal use conditions Health Effects: eye: severe eye irritation // skin: moderate irritation // inhalation: no health effects are expected TLV/PEL:

CRSS : Chemical Name: S-H20: 0.0178 g/L @ VP: 4.7E-6 torr @ MW: 296.00 %<500 %<1000 Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:
Consumer Use: No SAT (concerns) (10/07/2008): Migration to groundwater: Slow PBT rating: P1B1T2 Health: 1-2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC =3ppb) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2B NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: Nosfile:///J|/SNURS/SNUR%20Batch%20FY10-3/sanitized%20report/sanitized%20engineering%20reports/p080754.sanitized.en1.txt [5/11/2010 1:13:27 PM] PMN: 08-0754 Manufacturing: Number of Sites/ Location: Days/yr: Basis: Process Description: ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis: Inhalation:

Dermal:

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 08-0754 Processing: Number of Sites/ Location: Days/yr: Basis: Process Description: ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis: Inhalation:

Dermal:file:///J|/SNURS/SNUR%20Batch%20FY10-3/sanitized%20report/sanitized%20engineering%20reports/p080754.sanitized.en1.txt [5/11/2010 1:13:27 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 08-0754 Use: Number of Sites/ Location: Days/yr: Basis: Process Description: ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis: Inhalation:

Dermal:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 14 AND 15 OF THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,082
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,155
<PP&E>                                             664
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (387)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,432
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              530
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           202
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,902
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (22)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,637)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,707)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      70
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,637)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.39)


</TABLE>
No. 09-8463.

#### Jesse White, et ux., Petitioners v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Incorporated.

559 U.S. 1010, 130 S. Ct. 1937,

176 L. Ed. 2d 371,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2678,

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned ChiefFinancial Officer of Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterlyperiod ended October 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of theCompany.

Date: December 15, 2006
|     | /s/ Edward O. Irion                    |   |
|----------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|     |                                   |
|     | Edward O. Irion                        |
| * * | *  Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

1

----
No. 09-9773.

#### Steven Kent Bloom, Petitioner v. Kathleen Selzer-Lippert, et al.

560 U.S. 901, 130 S. Ct. 3293,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1179,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4090.

May 17, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kansas dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

Same case below, 214 P.3d 1226.
# C_2017429EN.01000102.xml

| 14.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 429/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 429/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8681 — Endowment Strategies/Benvic Europe)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 429/02)

On 5 December 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8681. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8681. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Alexander DEJESUS aka Alexander Sigaru-Argueta

No. 204P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Katy Dickinson-Schultz, Assistant Appellate Defender, For Alexander DeJesus (aka Alexander Sigaru-Argueta)

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender

Jordan M. Ford, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina

Kathryne E. Hathcock, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina

Neil C. Dalton, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 4th of June 2019 by Defendant in this *838matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
# C_2018298EN.01028601.xml

| 23.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/286 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/286

---

P8_TA(2017)0107

Medical devices ***II

European Parliament legislative resolution of 5 April 2017 on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC (10728/4/2016 — C8-0104/2017 — 2012/0266(COD))

(Ordinary legislative procedure: second reading)

(2018/C 298/28)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the Council position at first reading (10728/4/2016 — C8-0104/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Council position at first reading (10728/4/2016 — C8-0104/2017),

| — | having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 14 February 2013 (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 14 February 2013 (1),

| — | having regard to its position at first reading (2) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2012)0542), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to its position at first reading (2) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2012)0542),

| — | having regard to Article 294(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 294(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

| — | having regard to Rule 67a of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 67a of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A8-0068/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A8-0068/2017),

| 1. | Approves the Council position at first reading; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the Council position; |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council, in accordance with Article 297(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

3.

| 4. | Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

4.

| 5. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

5.

---

(1)  OJ C 133, 9.5.2013, p. 52.

(2)  Texts adopted of 2 April 2014, P7_TA(2014)0266.

---