alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10KSB
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,072,249
<SECURITIES>                                 2,432,411
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,863
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,512,523
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,512,523
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,160,483
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,530
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,318,510
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,512,523
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               128,272
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,750,652
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,622,380)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Board of Scientific Counselors, National Center for Health Statistics, Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period through January 19, 2011. 

For information, contact Virginia Cain, Ph.D., Executive Secretary, Board of Scientific Counselors, National Center for Health Statistics, Department of Health and Human Services, 3311 Toledo Road, Room 7204, Mailstop P08, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, telephone 301/458-4395 or fax 301/458-4020. 

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                 

Dated: February 3, 2009. 

Elaine L. Baker, 

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E9-5152 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.

LAMAR VALDEN SIMMONS , Petitioner

.
No. 1 CA

- CR 20

- 0 20 7 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR 1987

- 001119 The Honorable Stephen M. Hopkins , Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

APPEARANCES
Maricopa County Attorney ’ s Office , Phoenix By Amanda M. Parker Counsel for Respondent

Lamar Valden Simmons , Florence Petitioner FILED 9-24-2020STATE v. SIMMONS Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION
Presiding Judge Jennifer B. Campbell, Judge Lawrence F. Winthrop, and Chief Judge Peter B. Swann 1 delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM :
¶1 Petitioner Lamar Valden Simmons seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Proce dure 32.1. This is petitioner’s seventh petition.
¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court a bused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).
¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior

co urt’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion.
¶4 We grant review and deny relief.

1 Chief Judge Peter B. Swann replaces the Honorable Kenton D. Jones, who was originally assigned to this panel.
ROUSE v. FORSYTH COUNTY DSS

1PA19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 10, 2019

Gloria L. Woods, Assistant County Attorney, for Forsyth County Department of Social Services.

Benjamin P. Winikoff, Attorney at Law, for Rouse, Teressa B.

Gloria L. Woods, Assistant County Attorney.

M. Travis Payne, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th of July 2019 by North Carolina Advocates for Justice for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of July 2019."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-3632

___________________________

Charles L. Burgett

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

 ____________

 Submitted: July 26, 2023

Filed: August 1, 2023

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Charles Burgett appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of

summary judgment in his pro se employment discrimination action. Upon careful

1The Honorable David Gregory Kays, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri.
review of the record and the parties’ arguments, we conclude that the grant of

summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Said

v. Mayo Clinic, 44 F.4th 1142, 1147 (8th Cir. 2022) (de novo review of grant of

summary judgment). We find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of

Burgett’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. See Schoffstall v. Henderson, 223 F.3d 818,

827 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review).

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.24


                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

         In full payment of an acquisition structuring fee, and upon the terms
and conditions set forth herein, Consolidated Capital of North America, Inc.
(the "Borrower"), hereby promises to pay to the order of Stone Pine Colorado,
LLC ( the "Lender"), the principal amount of TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND AND
00/100 DOLLARS ($250,000) on demand.

         The Borrower shall have the right, at any time after the date of this
Note, without notice to the Lender, to prepay, in whole or in part, without
premium or penalty, the unpaid principal amount of this Note.

         The Borrower hereby waives presentment for payment, demand, notice of
dishonor, and notice of protest of this Note. The Borrower hereby consents to
any extensions of time, renewals, waivers or modifications that may be granted
by the Lender with respect to the payment or other provisions of this Note.

         No failure or delay on the part of the Lender in exercising any right,
power or privilege under this Note and no course of dealing between the Borrower
and the Lender shall operate as a waiver thereof. No single or partial exercise
of any right, power or privilege hereunder shall preclude any other or further
exercise of any right, power or privilege the Lender would otherwise have. No
notice to, or demand on, the Borrower in any case shall entitle the Borrower to
any other or further notice or demand in similar or other circumstances or
constitute a waiver of the right of the Lender to any other or further action in
any circumstances without notice or demand.

         Lender shall be entitled to recover from Borrower all of its costs
(including reasonable attorneys fees) incurred in connection with the
enforcement of this Note.

         THIS NOTE HAS BEEN EXECUTED AND DELIVERED IN THE STATE OF
COLORADO AND SHALL BE CONSTRUED AND ENFORCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO.

                                            CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL OF NORTH
                                            AMERICA, INC.


                                            By: /s/ Peter W. Damisch
                                            ------------------------
                                            Name:  Peter W. Damisch
                                            Title: President

Dated:  January 16, 1997
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JUVENILE MALE,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-30354

D.C. No. 08-CR-00059-RFC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Richard F. Cebull, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 8, 2011** 

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

R.C., a juvenile male, appeals from an order in which the district court

adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and sentenced him to five years detention

based on violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2242(2)(B) (sexual abuse) and 18 U.S.C. 

§ 1153(a) (offense committed within Indian country). Pursuant to Anders v.

FILED

MAR 14 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-30354

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), R.C.’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are

no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We

have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental

brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s order

is AFFIRMED.
No. 09-9002.

#### Gerald James Holland, Petitioner v. James V. Anderson, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary.

559 U.S. 1073, 130 S. Ct. 2100,

176 L. Ed. 2d 731,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3429.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

*732Same case below, 583 F.3d 267.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

134197 Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly TRINGA GOJCAJ, Personal Representative of Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. the Estate of Gjon Gojcaj, Deceased, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 134197 COA: 267929 Wayne CC: 02-231976-NO JENKINS CONSTRUC TION, INC. and APOSTOLOS GROUP, INC ., d/b/a THOMARIOS, Defendant, and

HUBER, HUNT & NICHOLS, INC., Defendant, Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and

BROCKMAN E. LEASING, INC., Defendant, Cross-Plaintiff-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 8, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk
'; 

### SERVED: September 25,2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF TRANS NORTH AVIATION, LTD. FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0046
NOTICE Ira Leibowitz, Attorney-Advisor is retiring on September 30, 2013. All future communications should be directed to the undersigned at: Richard C. Goodwin, U.S. Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, Attn: Room E 11-310 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 (Richard.Goodwin@dot.gov) Administrative matters should be directed to PatriciaMatthews, StaffAssistant (202) 366-5121 (Patricia.MatthewsCa{dot.gov)

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List

### 2

SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1 ONE COPY 

### Charles R. 

### Barnett III, Respondent's Counsel 

### Barnett & 

### Borth, LLC 800 Waukegan Road, Suite 200 Glenview, IL 60025 TEL: 847-809-9520 FAX: 815-356-7042 Jeanette B. Daubaras, Complainant's Counsel 

### Office ofthe Regional Counsel, Great Lakes Region Federal Aviation Administration 2300 East Devon Avenue Des Plaines, AL 600 18 TEL: 847-294-7313 FAX: 847-294-7498 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0046 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. ·
**Exhibit 32**

**Written Statement of Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and theChief Financial Officer of Regal Entertainment Group, a Delaware corporation(the “Company”), each hereby certifies that, to his/her knowledge on the datehereof:

(a)                                  the Form 10-Q of the Company for thethird quarter ended September 27, 2007, filed on the date hereof with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(b)                               the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
|   | /s/ Michael L. Campbell |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Michael L. Campbell     |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | November 6, 2007        |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/ Amy E. Miles        |
|   | Amy E. Miles            |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | November 6, 2007        |

 

 

----
NO. SCWC-10-0000062

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, 

vs.

MIKI POUSIMA, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(ICA NO. CAAP-10-0000062; CR. NO. 09-1-0288K)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, 

and McKenna, JJ., and Circuit Judge Sakamoto, 

in place of Duffy, J., recused)

The Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on

February 7, 2012 by Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant, Miki Pousima

is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 20, 2012.

Jack M. Tonaki, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

Public Defender, 

and Taryn R. Tomasa, /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Deputy Public Defender,

for petitioner/ /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

defendant-appellant

on the application. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

Charlene Iboshi, /s/ Karl K. Sakamoto

Prosecuting Attorney,

and Linda L. Walton,

Deputy Prosecuting 

Attorney, for respondent/

plaintiff-appellee

on the response.

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-10-0000062

20-MAR-2012

01:40 PM
No. 09-7692.

#### William May, Petitioner v. Aarsand Management.

559 U.S. 1046, 130 S. Ct. 2086,

176 L. Ed. 2d 432,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2878.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 908, 130 S. Ct. 1290, 175 L. Ed. 2d 1082, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 900.
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Jeffrey L. Vigil, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Uranium Resources, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Date: December 4, 2015

| |                      |                                                   
| | -------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Jeffrey L. Vigil
| | Title:               | Vice PresidentFinance and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF PERIODIC REPORT





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  each of
the  undersigned  officers  of  Magnitude
Information Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies that:





1.   The
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the Year ended December 31, 2009
(the "Report")  fully complies with
the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C.  78m or 78o(d)); and





2.   The
information  contained in the Report
fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:   March
31, 2010


/s/ Rudolf HaukeChief
      Executive Officer/s/ Joerg H. KlaubeChief
      Financial
Officer





This  certification  is
made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,
subject  to
the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein,  and
not for any other purpose.
STATE of North Carolina v. Shayno Marcus THOMAS

No. 388P09-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 1, 2019

Shayno M. Thomas, for Thomas, Shayno M.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 29th of April 2019 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Guilford County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of May 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th of April 2019 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of May 2019."

Ervin, J. recused
EXHIBIT 32.1

Walter Industries, Inc.
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Walter Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report"),
I, Victor P. Patrick, Vice Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

Date:
March 7, 2008

| |  | /s/VICTOR P. PATRICKVictor P. Patrick
Vice Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350



In connection with the filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission of BBJ Environmental Technologies,
Inc.s (the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 (the Report), the undersigned, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies in my capacity as an officer of the
Company, that:



(1) the Report fully complies
with the requirements of ss.13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



The above certification is given as of the
date of the Report and is limited to the periods covered by the Report.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate on April 14, 2004.



By:

/s/    MICHAEL
DIFILIPPOMichael DiFilippo, Chief Financial Officer




A signed original or this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission of its staff upon request.
ex10-9.htm














Exhibit 10.9







Current Director Fee Arrangements







Directors of Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. ("Bancorp") receive a monthly fee of $1,000, which is the only compensation paid to directors by Bancorp, except for stock options which may be granted in the discretion of the Board of Directors under Bancorp's 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. Directors of Great Southern Bank receive a monthly fee of $2,000. The directors of Bancorp and the directors of the Bank are the same individuals. As the sole director of Great Southern Financial Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank, William V. Turner, the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company and the Bank, receives a monthly fee of $600 for his service on that board. The directors of Bancorp and its subsidiaries are not paid any fees for committee service and are not reimbursed for their costs incurred in attending Board and committee meetings.