alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 99

                        REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders' of Lindsay Manufacturing Co.:

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index
appearing under Item 15(a)(1) on page 32, present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Lindsay Manufacturing Co. and its
subsidiaries at August 31, 2000, and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for the year ended August 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in
our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing
under Item 15(a)(2), presents fairly, in all material respects, the information
set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated
financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement
schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement
schedule based on our audit. We conducted our audit of these statements in
accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

                                          /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
                                          ------------------------------
Omaha, Nebraska                           PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
September 28, 2000



                                       48
**Exhibit      32.1**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 |                                                                                                                                |                                 |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| November              20, 2006  | By:                                                                                                                                 | /s/ EARL              W. ABBOTT |
|                                 | Earl                W. AbbottPresident                and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive                Officer) |
|                           |                                                                                                                     |                                    |
|--------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| November              20, 2006 | By:                                                                                                            | /s/ GEORGE              DRAZENOVIC |
|                           | George                DrazenovicChief                Financial Officer (Principal Financial                Officer) |

----
April 17, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

BREOF BNK TEXAS, L.P., Appellant

NO. 14-11-00351-CV V.

D.H. HILL ADVISORS, INC. AND D.H. HILL, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellees

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellees, D.H. Hill Advisors, 

Inc. and D.H. Hill, individually, signed February 10, 2011, was heard on the transcript of 

the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the 

judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, Breof BNK Texas, L.P. to pay all costs incurred in this 

appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Historic Preservation Properties 1989 LP
("HPP'89") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HPP'89.

/s/ Terrence P. Sullivan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Terrence P. Sullivan
General Partner
(Performing similar functions of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer)

Date:  March 9, 2006
Allison Ann LOYD (now Koch), Plaintiff, v. Eric Carl LOYD, Defendant.

No. COA18-641

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 3, 2019

AFFIRMED IN PART. REMANDED.
CONSENT OF SAMUEL KLEIN & COMPANY
                            INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
of Valley Forge Scientific Corp. on Form S-8 (file No. 333-63637) of our report
dated November 22, 2000, and December 11, 2000 as to notes 9 and 15, on our
audits of the financial statements of Valley Forge Scientific Corp. and its
subsidiaries as of September 30, 2000 and 1999, and for each of the three years
in the period ended September 30, 2000, which reports are included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                      SAMUEL KLEIN & COMPANY
                                      Newark, New Jersey
                                      December 19, 2000

                                      /s/ SAMUEL KLEIN & COMPANY
<PAGE>
STATE v. David Lee SMITH

580P05-16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 21, 2019

David Lee Smith, For Smith, David Lee

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, For State of NC.

Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, For State of NC.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of June 2019 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Ervin, J. recused
f8k0311ex10vi_atlas.htm


Exhibit 10.6


 


INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT







This Intellectual Property Assignment Agreement (“Agreement”) dated this 25th day of February 2011, is made and executed by and between Peak Wellness, Inc., a Connecticut corporation doing business as Peak Wellness Biopharma (“Assignor”), and Atlas Acquisition Corp., a Nevada corporation (“Assignee”).  Assignor and Assignee shall be collectively referred to as the Parties.







RECITALS:







WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Intellectual Property Purchase Agreement (the “IPPA”) of even date herewith, by and among, Assignor, Atlas Therapeutics Corporation (“Atlas”), and Assignee, a wholly owned subsidiary of Atlas, Assignor has agreed to irrevocably transfer and assign to Assignee all of its right, title and interest, on a worldwide basis, in, to and under the proprietary formula and the natural myostatin inhibiting product known as MYO-T12 and all of the intellectual property, including but not limited to any interest in any trade secrets, trademarks, and/or patents associated with MYO-T12 and used in connection with the MYO-T12 Activities (as defined in the IPPA) as set forth on the attached Schedule A (collectively, the “Intellectual Property”);


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for the mutual promises and in consideration of the representations, warranties and covenants set forth in the IPPA, the Parties hereby agree as follows:


 


1.              Assignment.  Assignor does hereby assign, transfer and convey to Assignee, its successors, legal representatives and assigns, all right, title and interest in the Intellectual Property and any and all rights associated with the Intellectual Property together with the goodwill associated or symbolized with the trademarks and domain names.  Assignor further covenants and agrees that it shall promptly carry out with Assignee the transfer of the Intellectual Property to Assignee.


 


2.              Cooperation. Following the execution of this Agreement, the Parties shall deliver to each other such further information and documents and shall execute and deliver to the other such further instruments and agreements as the other Party shall reasonably request to consummate or confirm the transactions provided for in this Agreement, to accomplish the purpose of this Agreement or to assure to the other party the benefits of this Agreement.







[Signature page follows]


 




  





  











  






 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have set their hands the day and year first above written.


 




	 	ASSIGNOR:	 
	 	 	 
	 	PEAK WELLNESS, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
By: 

	/s/ Carlon Colker	 
	 	 	Name: Carlon M. Colker	 
	 	 	Title: President	 
	 	 	 	 







 




	 	ASSIGNEE:	 
	 	 	 
	 	ATLAS ACQUISITION CORP.	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
By: 

	/s/ J.B. Bernstein	 
	 	 	Name:  J.B. Bernstein	 
	 	 	Title:  Chief Executive Officer
## Association of Compost Producers Inland Empire Disposal Association

July 23, 2012

Andrew Steckel , (Air

- 4) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105

- 3901

Subject: Docket Number R09

- OAR

- 2012

- 0252: Revisions to the California State

Implementation, South Coast Air Quality Management District; San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District

Dear Mr. Steckel:

The waste recycling and composting A ssociations listed above are comprised of compa nies engaged throughout Southern California in solid waste recycling and composting activities ranging from collection, processing, composting and energy technologies development. The Associations have reviewed the Federal Register regarding Docket Number R09

- OAR

- 2012

- 0252 and would like to convey the following:

NEED FOR HARMONIZED

, CONSISTENT AND UNIFO RM FOOD WASTE DEFINI TION S

ACROSS AGENCIES.

We recommend that prior to the development of food waste emission factors for composting
that harmonized, consi stent and uniform food waste definitions be developed and implemented in regulations across air quality, water quality and integrated waste management agencies in

the State of California.

We further recommend that the federal, State and local agencies dev elop and incorporate

standard food waste emission factors in rules and regulations to more accurately characterize

both reactive and non

- reactive ozone forming VOC emissions from greenwaste composting that

contains food material.

In general, we support th e EPA recommendations to further improve both SCAQMD and

SJUAPCD rules.

If you have questions regarding the contents of this letter, please don’t hesitate to contact the undersigned.

Yours very truly,

Dan Noble Paul Ryan

Executive Director, ACP IEDA Consultant (619) 992

- 8389 (951) 288

- 5409
U.S . DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA LAVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N

WASHINGTON , D C
I N TH E MATTE R OF : GOJE TAIRLINE S LL C (V D Gea rPins ) FAADocke tNo . CP10CE000 3 DM S No . FAA-2010-002 5 Judge : AL J Richar d C . Goodwi n

: - I NOTIC E O F DEPOSITIO N To : Davi d Kessler , Esq . FAA/Centra l Regio n Offic e o fRegiona l Counse l 90 1 Locust , Roo m 50 6 Kansa s City , Missour i 64106-264 1 Pleas e tak e notic e tha ta t1:0 0 p.m . o n Jun e 11 , 201 0 a tth e St . Loui s Fligh t Standard s Distric tOffice , 1080 1 Pea rTre e Lane , Suit e 200 , St . Ann , Missour i Respondent' s Counse l wil l tak e th e ora l depositio n o fDea n Adam , befor e aNotar y Publi co rbefor e som e othe roffice rauthorize d b yla wt o administe roaths . Sai d depositio n wil l b e recorde d b ystenographi cmean s an d wil l continu e unti l suc h tim e a s i t i s complete . Dated: Ma y^^,201 0 Davi d J . A . Haye s llrTEsq . Vic e Presiden t&Genera l Counse l Tran s State s Holdings , Inc . 1149 5 Navai d Roa d Bridgeton , Missour i 6304 4 (314)222-431 6 (314)222-431 1 (fax ) ATTORNE YFO R RESPONDEN T GOJE TAIRLINE S LL C; CERTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E ! l I I DAVI D J.A . HAYES , II I hereb ycertifytha to n Mayi^ , 2010 , I serve d th e ; fforegoin g Notic e o fDepositio n o n th e followin g parties ' counse l o rdesignate d i j representativ e a tth e addres s indicate d vi afacsimil e an d U.S . Mail , al l postag e prepaid .

Origina l &On e Copy : Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 1 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . ; 1 Washington , D C 2059 1 Si Attention : Hearin g Docke tClerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu rWrigh tBuildin g - Suit e 2W100 0 On e Copy : Davi d B . Kessle r Offic e o fRegiona l Counse l Centra l Region , ACE- 7 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n DO TBuildin g 90 1 Locust , Roo m 50 6 Kansa s City , M O 64106-264 1 Th e Honorabl e Richard C . Goodwin . AL J Offic e o fHearings , M-2 0 120 0 Ne wJerse yAve. , S.E . Eas tBuildin g Groun d Floor , Roo m El2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 

## JUOLL i \f)ilfX\d U
cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge 

Washoe County Alternate Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

Robert Elmer Gowins 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947.4 AllIB, 1
Exhibit 4(b)


SEE LEGEND ON REVERSE




E-___




__________SERIES EPREFERRED




Incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware





VASOMEDICAL, INC.


Authorized to issue 251,000,000 shares


250,000,000 shares of
1,000,000 shares of


Common Stock, $.001 par value
Preferred Stock, $.01 par value








THIS CERTIFIES THAT _________________________ is the owner of _________________________________ fully paid and non-assessable Shares of the above Corporation transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with the Seal of the Corporation.





Dated:                                ____________________





____________________________________________                                                            _______________________________________


PresidentSecretary















HE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN


REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933. THE SHARES HAVE


BEEN ACQUIRED FOR INVESTMENT AND MAY NOT BE SOLD,


TRANSFERRED, PLEDGED OR HYPOTHECATED IN THE ABSENCE OF AN


EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FOR THE SHARES UNDER THE


SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, OR AN OPINION OF COUNSEL TO THE COMPANY


THAT REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED UNDER SAID ACT.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40071

c/w No. 09-40085

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ALEJANDRO SILVA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:08-CR-1050-ALL

USDC No. 1:08-CR-911-1

Before KING, JOLLY, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alejandro Silva pleaded guilty to attempted illegal reentry after

deportation, having previously been convicted of an aggravated felony. Based

on a sentencing guidelines range of 57 to 71 months, the district court imposed

a sentence of 66 months in prison. As a result of this conviction, Silva’s

supervised release from a prior conviction for being unlawfully present in the

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 15, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 09-40071

c/w No. 09-40085

2

United States was revoked. The district court imposed a sentence of 8 months

in prison to be served consecutively to the 66 months imposed for the new

conviction.

Silva argues that the district court erred by failing to explain adequately

the reasons for imposing the guidelines sentence even though Silva had

presented nonfrivolous reasons for requesting a sentence below the

recommended range. In United States v. Peltier, 505 F.3d 389, 391-92 (5th Cir.

2007), this court determined that a defendant’s failure to object at sentencing to

the reasonableness of his sentence triggered plain error review. Silva

acknowledges that current circuit precedent forecloses the proceduralreasonableness issue because he cannot show that the alleged procedural error

was plain error. Silva is seeking only to preserve for further review the issue of

whether a failure to make a separate objection to the procedural reasonableness

of a sentence mandates application of plain-error review. See United States v.

Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 364-67 (5th Cir.) (discussing plain error

review with respect to reasonableness of sentences), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 192

(2009). Accordingly, he has filed an unopposed motion for summary disposition

to avoid the expenditure of time and resources on full briefing that cannot

change the outcome of the appeal.

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED, and Silva’s motion for

summary disposition is GRANTED.
TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT:
 

ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM
 

FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS AND
 

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT:
 

RESIDENTIAL DISHWASHERS, DEHUMIDIFIERS, AND COOKING 

PRODUCTS, AND COMMERCIAL CLOTHES WASHERS 

September 2008 

U.S. Department of Energy 

Assistant Secretary 

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 

Building Technologies Program 

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards 

Washington, DC 20585 

EE-2006-STD-0127 COMMENT 41.2
 

 

 

 

This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy
 

and by staff members of
 

Navigant Consulting, Inc.
 

and
 

Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
 

EE-2006-STD-0127 COMMENT 41.2
Exhibit 31.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C. ss.1350
               UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Stephen Couture, certify that:

1. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have reviewed this quarterly
report on Form 10-QSB of XRG, Inc., the registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: February 19, 2004

/s/ Stephen Couture
-------------------
Stephen Couture,
Chief Financial Officer