alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Anna Lardner McCarty, Daniel T. McCarty, Brian K. McCarty, John Moore McCarty, and Evelyn Wallace McCarty, Infants Under the Age of 21 Years, and Frances L. McCarty, *Plaintiffs in Error,*v. Model Land Company, a Corporation, Under the Laws of Florida, for the Use and Benefit of Horace S. McClendon, *Defendants in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February 22, 1928.

*Fee & Liddon,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*Nottingham, & Anderson, Russell L. Frink*and *Robert H. Anderson,*for Defendants in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 06998

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

06998\06998_ CERTIFICATION STATEMENT.pdf Plant certification statement

06998\06998_ Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 06998\06998_Checklist_110810_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

x 06998\06998_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06998\06998_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06998\06998_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06998\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\06998_Questionnaire Aerial Map Berkshire Power.pdfPlant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06998\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\06998_Questionnaire Water Balance Berkshire Power.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
STATE of North Carolina v. Armand Les WASHINGTON, Defendant.

No. COA18-984

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 6, 2019

NO PLAIN ERROR.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10622-10623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5108]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (09-024)]


Government-Owned Inventions, Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of availability of inventions for licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Patent applications on the inventions listed below assigned to 
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in 
the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for 
licensing.

DATES: March 11, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark W. Homer, Patent Counsel, NASA 
Management Office--JPL, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Mail Stop 180-200, 
Pasadena, CA 91109; telephone (818) 354-7770.
    NASA Case No.: NPO-45730-1: Phased-Array Optical Whispering Gallery 
Mode Modulator and Method.


[[Page 10623]]


    Dated: March 4, 2009.
Richard W. Sherman,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9-5108 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
No. 09-9475.

#### Dmitry Gorbaty, Petitioner v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC.

559 U.S. 1078, 130 S. Ct. 2116,

176 L. Ed. 2d 741,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3450.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 355 Fed. Appx. 580.
Print	

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

ODNI News Release No. 30-23

December 6, 2023

 

#### DNI Haines Statement on the Confirmation of Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Kruse to Lead the Defense Intelligence Agency

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Director of National Intelligence Avril D. Haines today issued the following statement:

 

“Congratulations to Lieutenant General Jeffrey Kruse, United States Air Force, on his confirmation as the 23rd Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA)! Backed by extensive experience and an extraordinary commitment to ethics in defense of country, the Intelligence Community is very fortunate to have him lead our Defense Intelligence enterprise amidst the increasingly complex threat environment we face today. Though I will sorely miss Jeff’s sage advice as my Advisor for Military Affairs, it will be wonderful to work with him in his new role, as he leads the truly exceptional DIA workforce.

 

“I would also like to thank Lieutenant General Scott Berrier, United States Army, on his remarkable leadership of DIA over the past few years during an exceptionally defining and dynamic period for the security of both our nation and world. Scotty is as amazing of a leader as he is a human being, and I wish him nothing but the best in his hard-earned and well-deserved retirement.

 

“Again, congratulations to both Jeff and Scotty!”

 

###
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S BALANCE SHEET AS OF FEBRUARY 29, 2000 AND THE STATEMENTS OF
OPERATION AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                           0000835585
<NAME>                                 C-Phone Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                             1
<CURRENCY>                                             USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-29-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                           2,517,633
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      293,583
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (83,086)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,051,804
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,869,623
<PP&E>                                           1,054,643
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (949,527)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,974,739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              496,292
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            89,801
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,388,646
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,974,739
<SALES>                                          1,346,114
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,401,150
<CGS>                                            1,227,927
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,230,927
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    (8,119)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,363,628)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,363,628)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,363,628)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.40)


</TABLE>
% Food exposure

% Once daily oral exposure, dose from cpfs SS F13_49 foodonly exp distribution.csv 30th percentile % Female adult, Body weight set to 72.9 kg % Cecilia Tan % August 24, 2015

prepare @clear @all % Setting model parameters start @NoCallback use human_parameters_MRP use preg_female_parameters

BWSW=1; % Set to 1 if BWT is provided BWST=72.9; % Initial BW in kg PREG=0; TSTOP= 1008; % Exposure duration in hrs (350 days)

%Single daily oral exposure DT = xlsRead("Food.xls", "30p", "A1:A43"); % Dosing Times DORAL=xlsRead("Food.xls", "30p", "B1:B43"); % Dose in ug/kg prepare time rbcce cv urinetcpy start@nocallback

mytable = [_time _rbcce _urinetcpy _cv*350.6]; %conc unit = ug/L save mytable @file='food_30.txt' @format=ascii
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350) I, Sherice P. Bench, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Achievement Corporation and AAC
Group Holding Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrants and have; a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrants, including their consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants respective board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: July 12, 2005 By:
    
    /s/ SHERICE P. BENCHSherice P. BenchCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER(principal financial officer)
No. 09-9590.

#### Fabian Bernal-Benitez, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1080, 130 S. Ct. 2123,

176 L. Ed. 2d 746,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3133.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 594 F.3d 1303.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 Docket No.BC Landfill Energy, LLC
ER09-503-000AC Landfill Energy, LLC
ER09-504-000WC Landfill Energy, LLC
ER09-505-000
 Take notice that, on March 5, 2009, BC Landfill Energy, LLC, AC Landfill Energy, LLC, and WC Landfill Energy, LLC filed an amendment to their January 7, 2009 applications for market-based rate authority in the above-captioned dockets, pursuant to the Commissions' request. Such filing serves to reset the filing dates in these proceedings. Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding. The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at 
                    *http://www.ferc.gov.*
                     Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. This filing is accessible on-line at 
                    *http://www.ferc.gov,*
                     using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
                    *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*
                     or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659. 
                    ( print page 10909) *Comment Date:*
                     5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 16, 2009. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary.


[FR Doc. E9-5430 Filed 3-12-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-31062

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BOBBIE LONDON, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CR-104

- - - - - - - - - -

November 12, 1998

Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

James J. O’Connor, court-appointed counsel for Bobbie London,

Jr., has filed a brief, a supplemental brief, and a second

supplemental brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967), and the previous orders of this court. We have

independently reviewed counsel’s briefs, the record, and London’s

responses to counsel’s motion to withdraw and find no nonfrivolous

issues. London’s response to the Government’s objection to his

filing of a supplemental response to counsel’s Anders brief is

construed as a motion to file his supplemental response out of
time, which is GRANTED. The motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. 42.2.
JOHN L. HILL Attorney General 

# The Attorney General of Texas June 16, 1978

Honorable Ii. Bate Bond County Auditor Comal County Courthouse NewBraunfels, Texas 78130 Opinion No.R-1185 Re: Authority of the county auditor to audit bond monies held bythe county sheriff. Dear **Mr.**Bond: You have requested our opinion regarding the authority of the county auditor of Comal County to audit bond monies held bythe sheriff. The bounty attorney contends that, since bond money is held by the sheriff in trust on behalf of a defendant, it never assumes the character of county funds and is therefore not subject to audit. Article 1651,V.T.C.S., however, grants to the county auditor

a general oversight of all the books and records of all the officers of the county, district or state, who may be authorized or required by law to receive or collect any money, funds, fees, or other property for the use of, orbelonging to, the county
.. .. Thus, if a county officer iv authorized to collect any funds belonging to the county, all his records are subject to audit, without regard to the character of any particular money which he collects inan official capacity. Furthermore, by virtue of article 1653,V.T.C.S., the auditor isgranted
“continual access” to and required to “examine all the books, accounts, reports, vouchers and other records of any officer.
.. .v InAttorney General Opinion WW-1400(1962),this office held that it was the county auditor’s duty
“to audit the child support account books of a District Clerk.” Webelieve it is abundantly clear that the statutes direct the county auditor to audit all monies held by the sheriff in an official capacity, whether ornot such monies belong to the county. But cf., Attorney General Opinion M-803(1971)(sheriff isnot required to comply with county auditor’s request under article 1663for information onfeeding prisoners).

p. 4775Honorable H.Bate Bond - Page 2 (H-1185)

You also ask whether a sheriff may deposit trust funds in a bank other than the county depository. Article 2549, V.T.C.S., which describes the procedure by which the commissioners court isdirected to designate acounty depository, applies to all funds held by acounty officer. Article 2549provides that

[ajll money collected or held by any district, county or precinct officer insuch county
. .. shall be governed by this law, and shall be deposited in accordance with its requirements
. ... Since article 2549requires the deposit of funds in the depository designated bythe commissioners court, and since the statute is applicable to all funds held by a county officer, webelieve it obliges the sheriff to deposit trust funds, as well as all other monies he holds inan official capacity, in the depository sodesignated. SUMMARY AR money held by a county officer in an official capacity, whether or not such money belongs to the county, is subject to audit by the county auditor under article 1651,V.T.C.S. All funds held by a county officer in an official capacity, including trust funds, must be deposited in the county depository. Very truly yours,

/$!i!!L$Es APPROVED: v

DAVIDM.KENDALL, First Assistant

Opinion Committee

P. 4776
Motion Granted; Order filed December 31, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00792

- CV

____________ JASON DEYO , Appellant

V.
CHAD DWAYNE BRADSHAW , KENNETH RANDAL HUF STETLER AND THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee s

On Appeal fr om the 239th Dist rict Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 103573

- CV



### ORDER

On December 3 , 2019 , appellees filed a motion strike the reporter ’ s record filed by appell ant on November 26, 2019. App ellees ’ motion is granted, and the reporter ’ s record filed on November 26, 2019 is struck from this case.

PER CURIAM
P anel Consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         8897891
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 14400295
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     605263
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              24874584
<PP&E>                                       631437904
<DEPRECIATION>                               239619167
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               421564117
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         15558889
<BONDS>                                      143000000
<COMMON>                                       2211190
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   216829808
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 421564117
<SALES>                                      112425640
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             113302825
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              34121262
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7051142
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               25621899
<INCOME-TAX>                                  11120000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           14501899
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  14501899
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-30892

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CRAIG TITUS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 94-CR-60058-1

- - - - - - - - - -

June 16, 1998

Before DAVIS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Craig Titus has appealed the revocation of his supervised

release and the sentence of imprisonment which he received

consequently. His sole appellate contention is that this

sentence is illegal because 18 U.S.C. § 3583, the relevant

statute, was repealed during the times when he violated a

condition of his supervised release. This contention is

frivolous, being refuted by the statute books. Accordingly,

Titus’s appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
No. 

-2-

APPEAL DISMISSED.