alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 3.1



CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT



TO THE



AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION



OF



ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC.



---



Pursuant to Section 242 of the General

Corporation Law of the State of Delaware



---



ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC., a Delaware corporation (hereinafter called the
Corporation), does hereby certify as follows:



FIRST: Section 1 of Article FOURTH of the Corporations Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended to read in its entirety as set forth below:



FOURTH:



1. The Corporation is authorized to issue a total of Two Hundred Forty-Five Million (245,000,000) shares of
stock (the Capital Stock) consisting of two classes of shares designated as Common Stock and Preferred Stock, respectively. The number of shares of Common Stock authorized to be issued is Two Hundred Forty Million
(240,000,000), par value $0.01 per share and the number of shares of Preferred Stock authorized to be issued is Five Million (5,000,000), par value $0.01 per share.



SECOND: The foregoing amendment was duly adopted in accordance with Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State
of Delaware.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Advanced Medical Optics, Inc.
has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be duly executed in its corporate name this 26THday of May, 2005.



ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC.By:

/s/ AIMEE S. WEISNERName:

Aimee S. WeisnerTitle:

Corporate Vice President,General Counsel and Secretary
Opinion issued August 11 , 2022

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 22 - 00276 - CR

——————————— DARVIN LAMONT EASTER , Appella nt

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appell e e On Appeal from the Co unty Crim inal C our t at Law No . 13

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2263217
MEMORANDU M OPINION Appellant, David Lamont Easter, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal from the trial court’s judgment because the trial court grant ed appellant’s motion for new trial. The granting of a motion for new trial restores the case to its position before the former trial and renders any appeal moot. See T EX . R. A PP . P
. 21.9(b); Garcia v.2

State , No. 01

- 14

- 00298

- CR, 2014 WL 3738051, at *1 (Tex. A pp.
— Houston [1st Dist.] July 29, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P
. 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consis ts of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Landau and Hightower. Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2( b).
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

July 24, 2012

p0716

Order 

July 24, 2012

144878

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144878

COA: 299875

Wayne CC: 10-001510-FH

DAVID HARSCHON WASHINGTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 16, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# Copy °Pt STEVE MDSE R X 0.23 FISH RETURN SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION STUDY: SUMMARY OF RESULTS AND DISCUSSION, CONSIDERATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

FINAL REPORT

JACKSONVILLE ELECTRIC AUTHORITY NORTHSIDE GENERATING STATION

Prepared For: Jacksonville Electric Authority Jacksonville, Florida Prepared By: Mark Mossier Golder Associates Inc. 6241 NW 23rd Street, Suite 500 Gainesville, Florida 32653-1500

October 1999 9837517B/R6

DISTRIBUTION: 5 Copies - JEA 1 Copy - Golder Associates Inc.
The NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, Plaintiff v. Robert N. WECKWORTH, Jr., Attorney, Defendant

No. COA18-866

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 4, 2019

AFFIRMED IN PART. REVERSED IN PART. REMANDED.
No. 09-9716.

#### Juan Antonio Lubo, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1084, 130 S. Ct. 2132,

176 L. Ed. 2d 752,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3273.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                             224
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,775
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,156)
<INVENTORY>                                     29,938
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               114,220
<PP&E>                                         160,890
<DEPRECIATION>                                (45,528)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 286,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,640
<BONDS>                                        275,902
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (108,261)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   286,126
<SALES>                                        179,811
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               179,811
<CGS>                                          156,754
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  173,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   156
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,601
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,246)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (768)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,478)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,478)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (11,478)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (11,478)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Cash Plus V
Financial Statements for the twelve months ended December 31, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,063,094<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                   628,909<F2>
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,005
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,629
<PP&E>                                      15,173,853<F3>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,880,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,526
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    16,866,963<F4>
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,880,489
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               132,375
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,092,765<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,960,390)<F6>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F6>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F6>
<FN>
<F1>Includes cash and cash equivalents of $569,987 and investments in commercial
paper of $493,107.
<F2>Includes all receivables of the Partnership included in "Other Assets" on the
Balance Sheet.
<F3>Includes investment in Joint Venture.
<F4>Equity of General Partners ($122,972), Limited Partners $16,942,989 and
unrealized holding gain on MBS of $46,946.
<F5>Includes operating expenses of $2,086,274 and Partnership's share of Joint
Venture net loss of $4,006,491.
<F6>Net Loss allocated ($59,604) to General Partners and ($5,900,786) to the
Limited Partners.  Net Loss per unit is ($2.86).
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Everest
Futures Fund, L.P. for the year 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000837919
<NAME> EVEREST FUTURES FUND LP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      12,420,621
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,780
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,478,401
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,265,882
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,212,519
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,478,401
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,799,059
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  719,381
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,079,678
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,079,678
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,079,678
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   377.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   377.35
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                       3,058,367
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,232,810
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (400,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    906,984
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,677,428
<PP&E>                                       1,145,229
<DEPRECIATION>                               (596,913)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,588,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,297,192
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        55,921
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,887,849
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,588,962
<SALES>                                     13,673,632
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,673,632
<CGS>                                        3,060,765
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,060,765
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,914,649
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               400,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,690,916
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,690,916
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,690,916
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. James Michael LATHAM, Jr.

No. 81P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Brendan O'Donnell, Assistant Public Defender, for Latham, James Michael (Jr.).

Catherine F. Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, Trey Robison, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Jennifer Harjo, Attorney at Law, Wilmington.

David Jester, Court Reporting Manager

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th of March 2019 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Davis, J. recused
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                                                    ------------
EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Shum Mukherjee, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10K of Genus Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: March 12, 2003
/s/ Shum Mukherjee
    Shum Mukherjee
    Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the Report) of XRG, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended December 31, 2005, each of the undersigned Eddie R. Brown the Chief Executive Officer and Jay Ostrow, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigneds knowledge and belief:



(1)
        the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:  January 3, 2006
        
        
        /s/ Eddie R. BrownEddie R. BrownChief Executive Officer, Presidentand Director






Dated:  January 3, 2006
        
        
        /s/ Jay E. OstrowJay OstrowChief Financial Officer, PrincipalAccounting Officer and Director


---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6533

CHARLES RICHARD RILEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE DEEDS; MIKE SPRADLING; RICHARD A.

YOUNG; RON ANGELONE; G. JOHNSON; UNKNOWN

PARTIES,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-97-172-R)

Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 20, 1997

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Richard Riley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. Riley

v. Deeds, No. CA-97-172-R (W.D. Va. Mar 18, 1997). Appellant's

motion for a default judgment is denied. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Robert Carlton Pittman, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed January 27, 1928.

*W. K. Zewadski, Jr.,*and *Wm. C. Pierce,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Fred H. Davis,*Attorney General, and *Boy Campbell,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. See Lowe v. State, decided at this term.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary finanical information extracted from Cash Plus 5
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,524,048
<SECURITIES>                                   645,762
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,097<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      22,834,246<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                               (104,586)<F3>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,916,567
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,863
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       24,853,704<F4>
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,916,567
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,080,428<F5>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               382,163<F6>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   698,265<F7>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F7>
<EPS-DILUTED>                               20,951,700<F7>
<FN>
<F1>Includes all receivables included in "other assets" on the Balance Sheet.
<F2>Includes investment in J.V. of $20,951,700 and costs related to the acquisition
of the asset underlying the investment $1,882,546.
<F3>Represents amortization of costs related to the acquisition of the asset
underlying the investment.
<F4>Deficit of General Partners (50,521), limited Partners of $24,904,225.
<F5>Includes all revenues of the Partnership.
<F6>Includes all revenues of the Partnership.
<F7>Net income allocated $6,983 to the General Partners and $691,282 to the Limited
Partners.  Average net income is $.34 on 2,060,450 Units outstanding.
</FN>


</TABLE>