alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 24, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00595

- CR

Christopher M. HARBER

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR5166

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT counsel’s motion to

withdraw. We ABATE this appeal and REMAND the case to the trial court for appointment of

new counsel to represent appellant on appeal.

W e ORDER the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the order

appointing new appellate counsel within thirty days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED on October 24, 2018

.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on th is 24th day of October, 2018

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
Brenda FENNELL, Administratrix of the Estate of Claude McKinley Fennell, Plaintiff, v. EAST CAROLINA HEALTH d/b/a Vidant Roanoke-Chowan Hospital, Darla K. Liles, M.D., and Vidant Medical Center, Defendants.

No. COA18-1096

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 18, 2019

AFFIRMED IN PART. NO ERROR IN PART.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00314-CV

Chantella Marie Rosales

v.

Robert Jacob Morales

On appeal from the

148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2012-FAM-5741-E

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 2, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                          383043
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                391708
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  391708
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3698
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          9002
<OTHER-SE>                                      369008
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    391708
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 40091
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (25006)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (25006)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (25006)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0




        

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Joshua A. BICE

No. 399P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Kirby H. Smith, III, Attorney at Law, New Bern, For Bice, Joshua A.

Cathy H. Pope, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th of November 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following *71order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Research Resources Special Emphasis Panel. Pre-application for A Biomedical Technology Research Resource.                     

*Date:*                         April 2, 2009.                     

*Time:*                         8 a.m to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Virtual Meeting).                     

*Contact Person:*                         Bonnie Dunn, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Dem. 1, Rm. 1074, MSC 4874, Bethesda, MD 20892-4874. 301-435-0824.                         *dunnbo@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research;93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 93.306, 93.333, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 4, 2009. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. E9-5136 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### Marcelino Colon, Respondent, v H&B Plumbing & Heating, Inc., et al., Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[718 NYS2d 832]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Esposito, J.), entered October 13, 1999, which, in an action for personal injuries and wrongful death arising out of a fire in the residence plaintiff shared with his decedents, denied defendant Con Ed’s and plumber contractor’s respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against each, with leave to renew upon completion of disclosure, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In support of the motion defendants rely on the opinion of the investigating Fire Marshal who asserted that the fire was not caused by a gas leak but by a faulty refrigerator motor *310causing the refrigerator’s wiring to overheat. In opposition, plaintiff submitted evidence that on April 21, 1995, Con Ed, responding to a report of a gas smell, inspected the premises, discovered a gas leak, shut off the gas, advised plaintiff that a hazardous condition existed and further advised that it would not turn the gas back on until it was in receipt of a “Blue Card” from the Buildings Department certifying that a licensed plumber had made the necessary repairs; that on April 22, plaintiff hired defendant plumber contractor; that on April 25, the contractor removed and replaced gas piping throughout the premises and turned the gas back on without communicating with Con Ed or the Buildings Department; that on May 6, 1995, Con Ed, called back to the premises on a report of a gas smell, found that gas had permeated the length of the common hollow walls throughout the premises, but left the premises without turning off the gas or providing further instructions; and that the fire occurred on May 7, 1995, killing plaintiff’s two children. We note that neither Con Ed nor the contractor has yet been deposed, that document demands served by plaintiff remain entirely outstanding, and that no affidavits from Con Ed employees were submitted on the motions. The motions were properly denied, with leave to renew upon completion of disclosure, there being an issue of fact as to whether a gas leak contributed to the fire or its consequences. Concur — Tom, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.
STATE of North Carolina v. Zachary Allen BLANKENSHIP

No. 131P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Mark Montgomery, Attorney at Law, for Blankenship, Zachary Allen.

Tracy Nayer, Assistant Attorney General.

Anne M. Middleton, Special Deputy Attorney General, David Learner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd of May 2018 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 2nd of May 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd of May 2018 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5017]



[[Page 10278]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-1020 (Review)]


Barium Carbonate From China

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on 
barium carbonate from China would be likely to lead to continuation or 
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States 
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this review on September 2, 2008 (73 FR 
51315) and determined on December 8, 2008 that it would conduct an 
expedited review (73 FR 77058, December 18, 2008).
    The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the 
Secretary of Commerce on January 30, 2009. The views of the Commission 
are contained in USITC Publication 4060 (January 2009), entitled Barium 
Carbonate from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-1020 (Review).

    Issued: March 4, 2009.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E9-5017 Filed 3-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Allen Glenn Thomas, * From the Justice Court

o f Jones County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2113

.

Vs. No. 11

- 15

- 00144

- CV * July 23, 2015

Texas Department of Criminal * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

Justice Officers, (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the

appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, in accordance

with this court ’ s opinion, the appe al is dismissed.
#### R. B. Morrison, *Appellant,*v. Leon Dairy Company, a Corporation, Tampa Creamery Company, a Corporation, and Paul Roggeband, *Appellee.*

En Banc.

Decision Filed February 16, 1928.

*Palmer, Dickenson, Shurley & Lake*and *Mabry, Reaves & Carlton,*for Appellant;

*Jackson, Dupree & Cone,*for Appellees.

*282Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350)  
 I, David G. Fiore, certify that: 
  
 1. I have reviewed this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of American Achievement Corporation and AAC
Group Holding Corp.; 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrants and have; a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrants, including their consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation;
and 
  
 c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; 
 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants respective board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  
 Date: Date: August 5, 2005 
 /s/ DAVID G. FIOREName: David G. FioreTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)
 28
### Henry 5w<*flty 

## fr-M-GOlHfr-GR Dear £<r or /II a

Jam, rtEC'D \H COURT OF APPEALS 12thCourt of Appeals District TV^EYMEXi\SV \ i i CATHY S. L.USK, CLtek ! Of APf>eaf* Tyler x* 

## Ilia COfft<\i 5>W,Vn -,y~ /*, *« , J. I a * L- J J'vr<? //j^ fl0 a££e$£ J.a & coaifurer &r- c/?Py /hack,x>r„ 

# Xtmhky ak He c#u4- 4* ccfibider less £apt**,<inJ +h«J~ * •rit>*> ,



### Henry M^^.^ey
No. 09-9142.

#### Victor Berrios, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1023, 130 S. Ct. 1925,

176 L. Ed. 2d 394,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2467.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 354 Fed. Appx. 629.
# C_2017372EN.01000401.xml

| 1.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 372/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 372/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8627 — GETEC/Briva/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 372/02)

On 25 October 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8627. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8627. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
No. 09-8348.

#### Rodney Royce Miller, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 954, 130 S. Ct. 1545,

176 L. Ed. 2d 138,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1272.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 333 Fed. Appx. 287.
STATE v. Cedric Theodis HOBBS, Jr.

263PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 1, 2019

John Keating Wiles, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

Amy Kunstling Irene, Special Deputy Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Sterling P. Rozear, Assistant Appellate Defender, Cedric Theodis Hobbs, Jr., for Hobbs, Cedric Theodis (Jr.)

Donald H. Beskind, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality.

David Weiss, Attorney at Law, James E. Coleman, Jr., Attorney at Law, Elizabeth Hambourger, Attorney at Law, Durham, for Coalition of State and National Criminal Justice and Civil Rights Advocates.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of June 2019 by Coalition of State and National Criminal Justice and Civil Rights Advocates for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of July 2019."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10593-10594]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5117]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Data Coordinating Center for Autism and Other 
Development Disabilities Research, Program Announcement Number (PA) 
DD09-002; Epidemiologic and Surveillance and Epidemiologic Research of 
Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophy, PA DD06-002

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting.

    Time and Date: 1 p.m.-4 p.m., March 26, 2009 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of the application received in response 
to ``Data Coordinating Center for Autism and Other Development 
Disabilities

[[Page 10594]]

Research, PA DD09-002; and the supplements received for 
Epidemiologic and Surveillance and Epidemiologic Research of 
Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophy, PA DD06-002.''
    For Further Information Contact: Geneva L. Cashaw, Designated 
Federal Official, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, NE., Mailstop K-92, 
Telephone (770) 488-8390.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: March 4, 2009.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9-5117 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Joshua Lee BLACKWELL, Defendant.

No. COA18-1040

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 21, 2019

DISMISSED IN PART. NO PLAIN ERROR IN PART.