alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T S I N MI N G L A M, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 73833 A ge nc yN o. A 070- 965- 173 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay15, 2012 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , G R A B E R , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. S i n M i ng L a m , ana t i ve of C hi naand c i t i z e n of

P ortuga l , pe t i t i ons pr o s e f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l f r o m an i mmi g r a t i o n j u d g e ’ s ( “ I J ” ) d e c i s i o nd e n y i n g h i s ap p l i c a t i o n f o ra s y l u m, 

# FI LED MA Y22 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 73833 2 w i thhol di ng of

r e m ova l , and r e l i e f

unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e . O ur j u r i s d i c t i o n i s g o v e rn e db y8 U. S . C . § 1 2 5 2 . We d i s m i s s th e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he B IA di sm i ss ed L am ’ s app ea l because he f ai l ed t o chal l enge the base s for the IJ ’ s dec i si on denyi ng re l i ef . A cc ordi ng l y, the ar gu m ent s L am pres ent s are u n e x h au s te d , an dw e la c kju r is d ic tio n to r e v ie w th e m . Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 358 F .3 d6 7 4 , 6 7 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DI S MI S S E D.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5347 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5347

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To reauthorize the HOPE VI program for revitalization of public housing 
                               projects.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``HOPE VI Reauthorization Act of 
2006''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAM.

    Section 24 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 
1437v) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1) of subsection (m), by striking the 
        matter that follows ``section'' and inserting the following: 
        ``such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2007.''; and
            (2) in subsection (o), by striking ``September 30, 2006'' 
        and inserting ``September 30, 2007''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 27, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5347

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To reauthorize the HOPE VI program for revitalization of public housing 
                               projects.
```
# C_2017271EN.01000102.xml

| 17.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8582 — Letterone/Holland & Barrett)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 271/02)

On 10 August 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8582. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8582. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**OF PACIFIC ENERGY GP, INC.**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and inconnection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarterlyperiod ended September 30, 2004 that is being filed concurrently with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned officer of Pacific Energy GP, Inc., the general partner ofPacific Energy Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”) hereby certifies that:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Partnership.

 
|   | /s/ GERALD A. TYWONIUK

Gerald  A. Tywoniuk

November  2, 2004 |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Pacific Energy Partners, L.P., and will be retained by PacificEnergy Partners, L.P., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Office of the Assistant Secretary for Veterans' Employment and Training

The Advisory Committee on Veterans' Employment, Training and Employer Outreach (ACVETEO) was established pursuant to Title II of the Veterans' Housing Opportunity and Benefits Improvement Act of 2006 (Pub. L. 109-233) and Section 9 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (Pub. L. 92-462, Title 5 U.S.C. app.II). The authority of the ACVETEO is codified in Title 38 U.S. Code, Section 4110.

The ACVETEO is responsible for assessing employment and training needs of veterans; determining the extent to which the programs and activities of the U.S. Department of Labor meet these needs; and assisting to conduct outreach to employers seeking to hire veterans. The ACVETEO will conduct a business meeting on Friday, March 20, 2009 from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., at the Omni Hotel, 401 Chestnut Street, second floor meeting room, Philadelphia, PA. The ACVETEO will discuss programs to assist veterans seeking employment and to raise employer awareness as to the advantages of hiring veterans, with special emphasis on employer outreach and wounded and injured veterans.

Individuals needing special accommodations should notify Margaret Hill Watts at (202) 693-4744 by March 9, 2009.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 2nd day of March 2009.

John M. McWilliam,

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Veterans' Employment and Training Service. 

 [FR Doc. E9-4915 Filed 3-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-79-P
#### L. B. J. Foreman, W. E. Foreman and Stanley W. Longmire, *Plaintiffs in Error,*v. Earlie Abbott, *Defendant in Error.*

En Banc.

Decision Filed May 14, 1928.

*Burket & Fish, F. W. Dart, O. K. Reaves*and *King <& Barringer,*for Petitioners;

*E. B. Drumright*and *Randolph Calhoun,*for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

This case now comes to this Court on petition of plaintiffs in error to be given permission to apply *374to the sound discretion of the judge of the Circuit Court of the' Twenty-seventh Judicial Circuit .praying that a writ of error *coram nobis*issue in the cause. Having' considered the petition, it is, the judgment of this Court that the same should be denied upon authority of the opinion in the ease of Washington v. State, 92 Fla. 730; 110 Sou. 259, and it is so ordered.

Denied.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown and Bueord, J. J., concur.
Changing the Safety Software Central Registry Program

Briefing by DOE to the

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

June 8, 2023 at 11:00 a.m.

Name Organization

Joyce L. Connery DNFSB—Chair

Thomas A. Summers DNFSB—Vice Chair

Jessie H. Roberson DNFSB—Board Member

Joseph Gilman DNFSB—Deputy General Counsel

Katherine Herrera DNFSB—Deputy Technical Director

Tara Tadlock DNFSB—Associate Director for Board Operations 

Jonathan Plaue DNFSB—Associate Technical Director for Nuclear Facility Infrastructure and 

Projects

Mark Sautman DNFSB—Associate Technical Director for Field Operations

Timothy Dwyer DNFSB—Associate Technical Director for Nuclear Materials Processing and 

Stabilization

Todd Davis DNFSB—Associate Technical Director for Nuclear Programs and Analysis

Michael Dunlevy DNFSB—Technical Staff

Julie Jarvis DNFSB—Technical Staff

Ryan Eul DNFSB—Technical Staff

Xiaodong Jiang DNFSB—Technical Staff

Zemenu Demeke DNFSB—Technical Staff

Kenneth Deutsch DNFSB—Technical Staff

Garrett Smith Acting Deputy Director, DOE-EHSS

Gregory Baker General Engineer, NA-ESH

Christopher Beaman Staff, DOE-EHSS-32

Yevonne Deaton QA Specialist, DOE-EM-3.113

Andrew Delapaz Staff, DOE-EHSS-30

James Gambrell QA Specialist, DOE-EM-3.113

Sharon Jasim-Hanif Director, DOE-EHSS-32

Robert Lukes Staff, DOE-SC-4

Garvey McKeown Staff, DOE-EHSS-32
Daniel Middleton Staff, DOE-SC-4

Johnnie Nevarez Director, NA-EHS-22

Larry Perkins Acting Director, DOE-EHSS-30

Joe Olencz Director, DOE-EHSS-1.1, Departmental Representative to DNFSB

Mark Do Staff, DOE-EHSS-1.1

David Nester Staff, DOE-EHSS-1.1

Steve Petras Staff, DOE-EHSS-1.1
Order entered January 2, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01246-CR

JOHNATHAN EUGENE COOPER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 297th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1031532D

ORDER

Before the court are (1) appellant’s December 19, 2019 pro se motion for a thirty-day 

extension of time to file a pro se “Rehearing/En-banc consideration motion”; (2) a December 23, 

2019 motion for rehearing submitted by appellant’s appointed appellate counsel; and (3) a 

December 31, 2019 “Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Extension of Time to File Motion for 

Rehearing” filed by appellant’s counsel.

The opinion in this case was issued December 5, 2019, and appellant then had fifteen 

days to file a motion for rehearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. Though appellant’s counsel did not 

submit a motion for rehearing until December 23, 2019, counsel’s December 31, 2019 

unopposed extension request was timely and explained he was preparing for another trial and 

miscalculated the motion’s due date. See TEX. R. APP. 49.8. We GRANT the December 31, 2019 
extension motion and ORDER the December 23, 2019 motion for rehearing filed. That motion 

for rehearing will be considered and ruled on in due course.

As to appellant’s pro se extension motion, appellant is not entitled to hybrid 

representation. See Scheanette v. State, 144 S.W.3d 503, 505 n.2 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004); Rudd 

v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1981). On December 30, 2019, this 

court granted appellant’s December 19, 2019 pro se request to extend time to file a motion for en 

banc reconsideration. Because appellant is represented by counsel, we (1) VACATE the 

December 30, 2019 order granting appellant’s pro se request for an extension of time to file a 

motion for en banc reconsideration and (2) DENY appellant’s December 19, 2019 pro se

extension motion in its entirety. 

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE 

JUSTICE
STATE of North Carolina v. Brodie Lee HAMILTON

No. 10P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Meghan Adelle Jones, Attorney at Law, For Hamilton, Brodie Lee

Daniel Paul Mosteller, Attorney at Law, For State of North Carolina

Michael Bonfoey, District Attorney, For the State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 18th of January 2019 by *823State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
ROUSE v. FORSYTH COUNTY DSS

1PA19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 24, 2019

Gloria L. Woods, Assistant County Attorney, For Forsyth County Department of Social Services

Benjamin P. Winikoff, Attorney at Law, For Rouse, Teressa B.

Gloria L. Woods, Assistant County Attorney

M. Travis Payne, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For N.C. Advocates for Justice

Robert M. Elliot, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, For Rouse, Teressa B.

Griffin Morgan, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, For Rouse, Teressa B.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 23rd of July 2019 by Respondent:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of July 2019."

Respondent shall have up to and including the 9th day of September 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

MANDATE

TO THE 380TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF COLLIN COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, on the 14th day of January, 2015, the 

cause on appeal to revise or reverse the judgment between

JEANNIE MCKELVY, Appellant

No. 05-13-00990-CV V.

COLUMBIA MEDICAL CENTER OF 

MCKINNEY SUBSIDIARY, L.P., D/B/A 

MCKINNEY MEDICAL CENTER, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District 

Court, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-04187-2011.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers. 

Justices Bridges and Lang participating.

was determined; and this Court made its order in these words:

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order signed 

November 14, 2013, granting the motion to dismiss filed by appellee Columbia Medical Center 

of McKinney Subsidiary, L.P., d/b/a/ McKinney Medical Center is REVERSED and this cause 

is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is ORDERED that appellant Jeannie McKelvy recover her costs of this appeal from 

appellee Columbia Medical Center of McKinney Subsidiary, L.P., d/b/a/ McKinney Medical 

Center.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of the Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth District of Texas, in this behalf, and have it duly obeyed and executed.
–2–

WITNESS the HON. CAROLYN WRIGHT, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, with 

the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Dallas, this 27th day of March, 2015.

LISA MATZ, Clerk
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FIFTH DISTRICT, AT DALLAS

No. 05-13-00990-CV

JEANNIE MCKELVY

V.

COLUMBIA MEDICAL CENTER OF MCKINNEY, ET AL

(Trial Court No. 380-04187-2011 in the 380th Judicial District Court of Collin County)

The costs incurred on appeal to the Fifth Court of Appeals Dallas, Texas are below: $338.00

Fee Date Type of Fee Charges Paid Paid By

03/26/2014

02/25/2014

01/10/2014

12/17/2013

10/25/2013

09/20/2013

08/29/2013

07/25/2013

07/25/2013

Motion fee

Motion fee

Motion fee

Motion fee

Required Texas.gov efiling fee

Required Texas.gov efiling fee

Clerk's record

Required Texas.gov efiling fee

Filing

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$5.00

$5.00

$108.00

$5.00

$175.00

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PATTI ARTAVIA

JACKIE GROVES

BARBARA WILCOX

TEXAS CONCIERGE

BRENDA GALLEGOS

BRENDA GALLEGOS

APPELLANT ATTORNEY

CHRISTIN PRADO

CHRISTIN PRADO

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, LISA MATZ, CLERK OF THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS AT 

DALLAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of 

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and 

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and 

the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the Fifth

District of Texas, this March 27, 2015.

/s/ LISA MATZ, Clerk of the Court
No. 09-1086.

#### MR Crescent City, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Douglas S. Draper, et al.

560 U.S. 905, 130 S. Ct. 3278,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1184,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4015.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 588 F.3d 822.
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION
ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Donald
J. Percenti, President and Chief Executive Officer of ACC Group Holding Corp.
and American Achievement Corporation (the “Companies”), hereby certify
that:





(1) The
Quarterly Report of the Companies on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 30,
2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.





Date:
July 10, 2009





/s/
      DONALD J. PERCENTIName:
            
            Donald
      J. PercentiTitle:
            
            President
      and Chief Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer)
October 25 , 2016



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CITY OF GALENA PARK; DANNY P. SIMMS, CRUZ R. HINOJOSA, JR., MARICELA SERNA, AND JUAN FLORES, IN THEI R OFFICIAL CAPACITIES AS MEMBERS OF THE GA LENA PARK CITY COMMI SSION; ROBERT PRUETT, IN HI S OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CITY ADMINISTRATOR OF THE CITY OF GALENA PARK; MAYRA GONZALES, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPA CITY AS CITY SECRETA RY OF THE CITY OF GALENA PARK; JIM DEF OYD, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPA CITY AS CITY ATTORNEY OF THE CITY OF GALENA PARK; AND ESMERALDA MOYA, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPA CITY AS MAYOR OF THE CITY OF GALENA PARK, APPELLANTS

NO. 14

- 15

- 00708

- CV V.

BARRY PONDER , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee Barry Ponder, signed August 17, 2015, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for further proceedin gs in accordance with the court’ s opinion. We further ord er that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellee Barry Ponder.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Wells Real Estate Fund III, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the
undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        
|------------------------
|                        
|/s/    LEO F. WELLS, III
|Leo F. Wells, III       
|Chief Executive Officer 
|March 28, 2006          



|                          
|--------------------------
|                          
|/s/    DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
|Douglas P. Williams       
|Chief Financial Officer   
|March 28, 2006