alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018346EN.01025301.xml

| 27.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/253 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/253

---

P8_TA(2017)0389

Subjecting furanylfentanyl to control measures *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 October 2017 on the draft Council implementing decision on subjecting N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)piperidin-4-yl]furan-2-carboxamide (furanylfentanyl) to control measures (11212/2017 — C8-0242/2017 — 2017/0152(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2018/C 346/44)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the Council draft (11212/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Council draft (11212/2017),

| — | having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0242/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0242/2017),

| — | having regard to Council Decision 2005/387/JHA of 10 May 2005 on the information exchange, risk-assessment and control of new psychoactive substances (1), and in particular Article 8(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Council Decision 2005/387/JHA of 10 May 2005 on the information exchange, risk-assessment and control of new psychoactive substances (1), and in particular Article 8(3) thereof,

| — | having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0309/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0309/2017),

| 1. | Approves the Council draft; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

---

(1)  OJ L 127, 20.5.2005, p. 32.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                               TELVUE CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. sec. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of TelVue Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jesse Lerman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:     03/31/09                  /s/ Jesse Lerman
                                    ----------------
                                    Jesse Lerman
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer
From: Cassidy Mike [ mailto:MICHAEL.CASSIDY@kohler.com ]

Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 8:35 AM

To: Barnett, Keith

Cc: Nizich, Sharon

Subject: RE: Link to proposed NESHAP for Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing;

and NESHAP for Clay Ceramics Manufacturing is enclosed

Keith and Sharon,

Attached is a request to extend the public comment period for the proposed Clay MACT rule by 60

days, until approximately April 18, 2015. Is this e

- mail request sufficient for EPA’s consideration, or

must I submit a hard copy via mail to you, or must a request be submitted to the docket? How long

will it take EPA to render a decision on this request? Thank you.

Mike

Michael J. Cassidy

EHS Specia list

Kohler Co.

444 Highland Drive

Mail Stop 009

Kohler, WI 53044

p. (920) 457

- 4441, x 77263

f. (920) 459

- 1682

mike.cassidy@kohler.com

Save money. Save water. Support Habitat for Humanity. Visit www.SaveWaterAmerica.com

<< Clay MACT Public Comment Period Extension Request Dec 2014.pdf >>
No. 09-9732.

#### Moises Valverde-Garcia, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1084, 130 S. Ct. 2134,

176 L. Ed. 2d 753,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3263.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 358 Fed. Appx. 946.
Print	

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ODNI News Release No. 06-24 March 8, 2024

 

#### ODNI and CIA Release the Intelligence CommunityOSINT Strategy for 2024-2026

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) today released the Intelligence Community (IC) Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) Strategy for 2024-2026.

OSINT, or intelligence derived exclusively from publicly or commercially available information that addresses specific intelligence priorities, requirements, or gaps, is vital to the IC’s mission, providing unique intelligence value and enabling all other intelligence collection disciplines. Given the expansive and evolving open source environment, the IC has been working to modernize its approach to collecting, creating, and delivering OSINT, and the IC OSINT Strategy outlines the way forward.

“The IC OSINT Strategy represents the beginning of a long-term process that will professionalize the OSINT discipline, transform intelligence analysis and production, and create new avenues for partnering with brilliant American innovators and like-minded foreign partners,” said Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines.

“As the IC’s Functional Manager for OSINT, I know the critical role that OSINT plays in defending our country and values,” said CIA Director William J. Burns. “In this pivotal moment, when OSINT is increasingly important and growing in demand, an IC-wide OSINT strategy is key to helping the IC move forward in a coordinated and determined way.”

The strategic focus areas for action are:
      - Coordinate open source data acquisition and expand sharing
      - Establish integrated open source collection management
      - Drive OSINT innovation to deliver new capabilities
      - Develop the next-generation OSINT workforce and tradecraft

The IC OSINT Strategy is available here.

 

###
EXHIBIT
      32.1




Written
      Statement of Principal Executive Officer Furnished Pursuant to


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


as
      Adopted by


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of HouseRaising, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory J. Wessling,
      Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition as of March 31, 2007 and results of operations for
      the
      quarter ended March 31, 2007 of the Company and its subsidiaries.




/s/ Gregory
              J. WesslingGregory
                J. Wessling
              Chairman
                of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
                Officer)




May
      15,
      2007




This
        certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
        Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. 09-9558.

#### Rodney Audie Belvado, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1080, 130 S. Ct. 2119,

176 L. Ed. 2d 744,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3290.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 359 Fed. Appx. 854.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brian A. Simmons, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 614]

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Nicandri, J.), rendered April 25, 2000, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant was sentenced to time served, 180 days of electronic house monitoring and five years’ probation as a result of his plea of guilty of attempted rape in the second degree. As a condition to probation, defendant was to have no unsupervised contact with any persons less than 17 years old. Thereafter, defendant pleaded guilty to violating the aforementioned condition of his probation and County Court revoked his probation and resentenced defendant to a prison term of 1 to 3 years. Defendant maintains that the agreed-upon sentence was harsh and excessive, especially given, *inter alia,*his youthful age and his depressed state at the time of resentencing and seeks to have the sentence reduced in the interest of justice. Notwithstanding defendant’s assertions, our review of the record reveals no abuse of discretion on the part of County Court nor any extraordinary circumstances warranting our intervention (see, *People v Corpin,*269 AD2d 622, *lv denied*95 NY2d 795).

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
J. 

the appeal should be deemed timely filed pursuant to NRAP 4(d). We 

disagree. NRAP 4(d) requires an inmate confined to an institution to use 

the notice of appeal log, if available, to receive the benefit of the rule. 

Appellant concedes that he failed to use the notice of appeal log as 

required. 2Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this 

appeal, see Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994), 

and we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

Saitta 

2:f 

Gibbons 

PICKERING, J. ,dissenting; 

Under this court's holding in Kellogg v. Journal 

Communications, 108 Nev. 474, 477, 835 P.2d 12, 13 (1992), if appellant 

delivered his notice of appeal to a prison official for mailing on or before 

August 4, 2014, the notice of appeal would be deemed timely filed. 

Likewise, NRAP 4(d) provides that a notice of appeal "is timely if it is 

delivered to a prison official for mailing on or before the last day for filing." 

2We decline to address appellant's contention that NRAP 4(d) is 

unconstitutional because it is not supported by cogent argument. See 

Maresca v. State, 103 Nev. 669, 673, 748 P.2d 3, 6 (1987). 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A 

J. 
NRAP 4(d) further provides that when the prison has a notice of appeal 

log or another system designed for legal mail, the prisoner must use the 

logs to receive the benefit of this rule. 

Here, it appears that appellant delivered his notice of appeal 

to a prison official for filing on July 26, 2014, within the 30-day appeal 

period provided by NRS 34.560(2). Although appellant did not use the 

notice of appeal log, as the majority holds NRAP 4(d) requires, I am not 

convinced that NRAP 4(d) should be applied to defeat this court's 

jurisdiction under the unique circumstances of this case, especially where 

our prior orders in this appeal stated that appellant's notice of appeal 

would be deemed timely filed pursuant to NRAP 4(d) if he could provide 

documentation establishing that he timely delivered the notice of appeal 

to a prison official for mailing. Given our prior orders and appellant's 

timely delivery of the notice of appeal to a prison official, NRAP 2 

authorizes this court to suspend application of NRAP 4(d). I would do so 

and allow this appeal to proceed. 

Pickering 7 

cc: Chief Judge, Eighth Judicial District Court 

Carmine J. Colucci & Associates 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

Rick Shawn 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

3 

J. 

(0) 1947A en
Exhibit 10.39

 

STAPLES, INC.

 

   LONG TERM CARE INSURANCE PLAN SUMMARY

 

Staples provides long-term care insurance coverage which is fully paid by the company to officers of Staples, including the named executive officers. The coverage includes a maximum daily benefit of $150 per day or $54,750 per year, adjusted annually.  The benefit continues post-retirement based on age and service at the time of separation from employment.
#### Vandersall & Company, a Partnership Composed of C. E. Vandersall, H. E. Light, J. W. Siler, G. D. Carpenter and G. A. Roose, (Complainant Below), *Appellant,*v. Jumper Creek Drainage District, a Public Corporation, *et al.*(Defendants Below), *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February 13, 1928.

*191*G. P. Garrett and P. A. Vans Agnew,*for Appellants;"

*John B. Sutton*and *Gaines & Futch,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore -been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its’ judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
STATE of North Carolina v. Douglas Eugene CURLEE

No. COA19-285

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 3, 2019

ARRESTED IN PART. REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART.
No. 1249, Misc.

Petitioner *pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant'Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene*and *Howard A. Glickstein*for respondent.

#### Leigh *v.*Hoover, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
Aaron LUCY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 105139

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: February 13, 2018

Susan DeGeorge, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant

Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent

Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Aaron Lucy appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Lucy was convicted of murder in the first-degree, abuse of a child resulting in death, two counts of armed criminal action, and tampering with physical evidence. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 7, 2010 

p0331 

Order 

 

April 7, 2010 

138270 & (17) 

 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138270 

 COA: 287574 

Wayne CC: 02-001169 

LEON DAVIS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of September 11, 2009, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer 

the application for leave to appeal the January 7, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals. On 

order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is 

again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions 

presented should be reviewed by this Court.
|   | 1. | Investment      shall lend RMB27, 000,000 (RMB Twenty Seven Million) to    Group. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                                                                                                           |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2.     | Investment      agrees to cancel a loan owed to it by Holdings in the amount of RMB27,      000,000 (RMB Twenty SevenMillion). |

|   |   |                                                                                                                |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 3.     | Holdings      agrees to cancel RMB27, 000,000 (RMB Twenty Seven Million) of dividend      owed to it by Biological. |

|   |   |                                                                                                           |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 4.     | Biological      agrees to pay RMB27, 000,000 (RMB Twenty Seven Million) to Group on behalf      of Investment. |

| Tianshi      International Holdings   | Tianjin      Tianshi Biological Development |
|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                                  |                                        |
| Group      Limited                    | Co.,      Ltd                               |
|                                  |                                        |
| Legal      Representative:            | Legal      Representative:                  |
|                                  |                                        |
| /s/      Jinyuan Li                   | /s/      Yiqun Wu                           |
|                                  |                                        |
| Tianshi      International Investment | Tianjin      Tianshi Group Co., Ltd         |
|                                  |                                        |
| Group Co.,      Ltd                   |                                        |
|                                  |                                        |
| Legal      Representative:            | Legal      Representative:                  |
|                                  |                                        |
| /s/      Jinyan Li                    | /s/      JinyuanLi                          |

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10559-10560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5363]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

[[Page 10560]]


ACTION: Notice of public meeting and hearing agenda (amended).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date and Time:  Tuesday, March 17, 2009, 11 a.m.-12 p.m. EST (Meeting), 
1-3 p.m. EST (Hearing).

Place:  U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave., NW., 
Suite 150, Washington, DC 20005 (Metro Stop: Metro Center).

Agenda:  The Commission will hold a public meeting to consider 
administrative matters. The Commission will conduct a public hearing to 
receive presentations on the following topic: Voter Registration 
Databases: Initial Discussion on Reviewing HAVA Mandated Guidance. 
Members of the public may submit written testimony regarding HAVA 
mandated guidance on voter registration databases via e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b5c1d0c6c1dcd8dadbccf5d0d4d69bd2dac3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d2a6b7a1a6bbbfbdbcab92b7b3b1fcb5bda4">[email protected]</span></a>, or via mail addressed to the U.S. Election 
Assistance Commission 1225 New York Ave., NW., Suite 1100, Washington, 
DC 20005, or by fax at 202-566-3127. Written testimony must be received 
by 5 p.m. EST on Monday, March 16, 2009. All testimony should have the 
heading ``Testimony on voter registration databases'' in the subject/
attention line. Members of the public may observe but not participate 
in EAC meetings unless this notice provides otherwise. Members of the 
public may use small electronic audio recording devices to record the 
proceedings. The use of other recording equipment and cameras requires 
advance notice to and coordination with the Commission's Communications 
Office.*
    * View EAC Regulations Implementing Government in the Sunshine Act.
    This meeting and hearing will be open to the public.

Person to Contact for Information:  Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 
566-3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-5363 Filed 3-9-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nucotec, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Earl W. Abbott,
President (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



June 10, 2004                  By:   /s/ Earl W. Abbott
                               ----------------------------------------------
                               Earl W. Abbott
                               President (principal executive officer) and Chief
                               Financial Officer