Appendix A-1

Air Quality System (AQS) Data
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

User ID: GYE QUICKLOOK CRITERIA PARAMETERS

Report Request ID: 919382 Report Code: AMP450 Oct. 13, 2011

GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

Tribal

Code State County Site Parameter poe City

39 081

54 009

54 029

AQCR DAR CBSA esA

EPA

Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date

PROTOCOL SELECTIONS

Parameter

Classification Parameter Method Duration

STATE_CODE

COUNTY_CODE

SITE_ID

poe

DATES

EDT_ID

4

2

3

5

6

7

88101

SELECTED OPTIONS

QUICK LOOK

I SORT ORDER I

I Option Type Option Value I Order Column

EVENTS PROCESSING EXCLUDE REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENTS 1 PARAMETER_CODE

MERGE PDF FILES YES

WORKFILE DELIMITER

GLOBAL DATES APPLICABLE STANDARDS

Start Date End Date Standard Description

2008 2010 PM25 24-hour 2006

PM25 Annual 2006

Selection Criteria Page 1
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

EXCEPTIONAL DATA TYPES

lEDT DESCRIPTION I

o NO EVENTS

1 EVENTS EXCLUDED

2 EVENTS INCLUDED

5 EVENTS WI,TH CONCURRENCE EXCLUDED

Note; The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria. Page 1 of 6

Oct. 13, 2011
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Oct. 13, 2011

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Ohio Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

P 98TH WTD

a 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH PERCENTILE AR1TH

ISITE 10 C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OES MAX MAX MAX MAX VALUE MEAN CERT EDT

39-081-0017 1 0809 Steubenville Jefferson 618 LOGAN ST. 2008 120 106 45.6 36.4 35.2 34.8 35.2 14.28* y 0

39-081-0017 1 0809 Steubenville Jefferson 618 LOGAN ST. 2009 120 112 38.6 25.1 24.7 24.0 24.7 12.11 0

39-081-0017 1 0809 Steubenville Jefferson 618 LOGAN ST. 2010 120 108 35.3 33.3 29.8 29.1 29.8 12.68 0

39-081-1001 1 0809 Mingo Jefferson 501 2008 120 57 39.5 35.0 30.9 27.7 35.0 14.05 y 0

Junction COMMERICAL

39-081-1001 1 0809 Mingo Jefferson 501 2009 120 58 23.5 23.3 22.9 22.5 23.3 11.22 0

Junction COMMERICAL

39-081-1001 1 0809 Mingo Jefferson 501 2010 120 55 25.9 25.1 23.3 22.5 25.1 12.64 0

Junction COMMERICAL

39-081-1001 2 0809 Mingo Jefferson 501 2008 120 48 38.2 33.5 26.6 26.1 38.2 13.57* y 0

Junction COMMERICAL

39-081-1001 2 0809 Mingo Jefferson 501 2009 120 52 23.1 22.5 22.4 21.1 22.5 10.69* 0

Junction COMMERICAL

39-081-1001 2 0809 Mingo Jefferson 501 2010 120 52 28.2 26.3 25.2 23.6 26.3 13.01* 0

Junction COMMERICAL

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria. Page 2 of 6
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Oct. 13, 2011

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) West Virginia Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

24-HOUR

p 98TH WID

0 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH PERCENTILE ARlIH

ITE 10 C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH ifOBS MAX MAX MAX MAX VALUE MEAN CERl' EDT

54-009-0005 1 1150 Follansbee Brooke FOLLANSBEE - 2008 145 117 39.8 39.5 38.9 35.6 38.9 14.68 y 0

MAHAN LANE

54-009-0005 1 1150 Follansbee Brooke FOLLANSBEE - 2009 145 122 38.3 24.4 23.2 23.1 23.2 12.15 0

MAHAN LANE

54-009-0005 1 1150 Follansbee Brooke FOLLANSBEE - 2010 145 122 32.6 32.0 29.8 29.7 29.8 14.14 0

MAHAN LANE

54-009-0011 1 1150 Weirton Brooke WEIRTON - 2008 145 121 37.4 35.9 34.9 34.5 34.9 13.79 y 0

MARLAND

HEIGHTS

ELEMENTARY

54-009-0011 1 1150 Weirton Brooke WEIRTON - 2009 145 118 48.6 29.3 26.3 24.7 26.3 11.88 0

MARLAND

HEIGHTS

ELEMENTARY

54-009-0011 1 1150 Weirton Brooke WEIRTON - 2010 145 122 38.0 36.3 31.6 30.8 31.6 13.48 0

MARLAND

HEIGHTS

ELEMENTARY

54-009-0011 2 1150 Neirton Brooke WEIRTON - 2008 145 29 38.4 37.5 34.7 31.4 38.4 15.48 y 0

MARLAND

HEIGHTS

ELEMENTARY

54-009-0011 2 1150 Weirton Brooke WEIRTON - 2009 145 32 48.4 25.7 25.0 19.2 48.4 11.86 0

MARLAND

HEIGHTS

ELEMENTARY

54-009-0011 2 1150 Weirton Brooke WEIRTON - 2010 145 29 37.6 30.0 29.2 21.5 37.6 14.37 0

MARLAND

HEIGHTS

ELEMENTARY

54-029-1004 1 1150 Weirton Hancock WEIRTON - OAK 2008 145 119 39.4 37.3 35.8 30.9 35.8 13 .33 y 0

ST AND OWINGS

ST (BETWEEN

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria. Page 3 of 6
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101)

24-HOUR

West virginia

YEAR METH #OBS

Oct. 13, 2011

Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

98TH vITO

1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH PERCENTILE ARITH

MAX MAX MAX MAX VALUE MEAN CERT EDT

29.6 28.7 25.2 22.9 25.2 11.25 0

34.4 33.1 31.2 30.7 31. 2 12.58 o

122

122

ADDRESS

DEAD ENDS)

WEIRTON - OAK 2009 145

8T AND OWINGS

ST (BETWEEN

DEAD ENDS)

WEIRTON - OAK 2010 145

ST AND OWINGS

ST (BETWEEN

DEAD ENDS)

COUNTY

Hancock

1 1150 Weirton Hancock

1 1150 weirton

p

o

C PQAO CITY

54-029-1004

54-029-1004

ISITE ID

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria. Page 4 of 6
PARAMETER

88101

88101

METHOD

CODE

120

145

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

METHODS USED IN THIS REPORT

COLLECTION METHOD ANALYSIS METHOD

Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS GRAVIMETRIC

R & P Model 2025 PM-2.5 Sequential Air Sample: Gravimetric

Oct. 13 r 2011

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria. Page 5 of 6
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

PQAOS USED IN THIS REPORT

jpQAO AGENCY DESCRIPTION I

0809 Ohio EPA, Southeast District Office

1150 West Virginia Air Pollution Control Commission

oct. 13, 2011

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria. Page 6 of 6
Appendix A-2

SLAMS letter
j

Environmental

Protection Agency

. John R. Kasich, Governor

Mary Taylor, Lt. Governor

ScottJ. Nally, Director

CERTIFIED MAIL

March 10, 2011

Cheryl L. Newton, Director

Air and Radiation Division

U.S.EPA, Region V

77 West Jackson Boulevard

Chicago, Illinois 60604

RE: 2010 SLAMS PM,.• and Ozone Data Certification

Dear Ms. Newton:

Please find enclosed our SLAMS Report (AMP-450, AMP-450NC and AMP255) for calendar year 2010 as required in 40 CFR, Part 58, Section

58.15.· The ambient concentration and the quality assurance data

have been completely submitted to the AQS database.

The remaining criteria pollutant data will be certified within the

month of April.

I certify that the Ozone and PM,., data in the report are accurate to

the best of our knowledge taking into consideration the quality

assurance findings and only to thee.xtent of the activities

performed by Ohio EPA.

There were no incidents of air pollution that reached or exceeded

levels as specified by Section 51.151 which could cause significant

harm to the health of persons.

Sincerely,

Robert Hodanbosi

Chief, Division of Air Pollution Control

Enclosure

50 West Town Street. SUne 700

P.O. Box 1049

CoIumbus,OH 43216-1049

6141644 3020

614 16443184 (fex)

www.epa.ohio.gov
Appendix B-1

Ohio 2005 SIP Base Year

Inventory Discussion
OHIO

2005 Base Year PM2.5 SIP Inventory

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency

Lazarus Government Center

50 West Town Street, Suite 700

Columbus Ohio 43215

Prepared by Ohio EPA

Division of Air Pollution Control

Emissions Inventory Unit

February 2008

1
Table of Contents

Section

Introduction , , 3

1.0 Point Sources 4

2.0 Area Sources 8

3.0 Non Road Sources 15

4.0 On Road Sources 17

5.0 MAR Sources .43

2-1 Categories included in the 2005 area source Inventory 8

2-2 Emission Factors used for Wood Burners included in area sources 11

3-1 NMIM NCO Tables for Specific Years and States 16

4-1 Federal Functional Class Categories 23

4-2 DVMT Summary by County 24

4-3 Speed by Federal Functional Class 28

4-4 Link Group Codes & Associated BPR Curves 29

4-5 Mobile6 Inputs 31

4-6 LADCO Data Output............................................ .. 39

4-7 County Summary Table of MPOs by County .40

5-1 Number of operations and LTOs for 2005 45

5-2 EDMS Aircraft Emissions 50

5-3 Fleet Emission Factor Categories 51

5-4 Pollutant by County (Sample) 54

Figure

1 Speed Comparison Graphs 27

2
2005 Base Year PM2.5 SIP Inventory for Ohio

Introduction

The State of Ohio has a number of counties with air quality data showing nonattainment for the following PM2.5standard:

• Annual Standard = 15.0 ug/m3

The Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) requires all states to revise and submit State

Implementation Plans (SIP) for areas which are classified as non-attainment of the 1997

Fine Particle (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The Federal

Register ( Vol. 72, No. 79/ Wednesday, April 25, 2007) provides the emissions inventory

rules and regulations for the PM2.5 Clean Air Fine Particle implementation rule. An

electronic version of the document can be found at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAAIR/2007/April/Day-25/a6347.pdf.

As part of the designation of non-attainment areas for PM2.5 standards, a new

attainment demonstration SIP will be necessary. A key element in the overall SIP

planning process is the need for an updated emissions inventory. This document

presents the 2005 Base Year Particulate SIP Emissions Inventory for Ohio as required

by the CAAA. It includes emissions for point, area, on-road mobile and non-road mobile

for the State of Ohio.

This technical report documents the procedures and the methodologies that were used

in the development of daily emissions for all counties in Ohio. This report describes the

folloWing:

1. Identification of stationary and mobile sources included in the

inventory;

2. Sources of data, and data collection methods used in the development

of the inventory;

3. Methods and procedures used to estimate emissions; and

4. Assumptions considered in the development of the emissions

inventories.

The intent of this report is to describe how the inventory was prepared, and what

information was considered in the inventory development.

This document is comprised of 5 sections, one section for each inventory type. The

biogenic inventory is not being discussed in this document because Ohio EPA did not

participate in the generation of this inventory. Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium

(LADCO) ran EPA's BEIS model in the Emission Modeling System (EMS) to generate

Summer Weekday emissions for VOC and NOx.

3
SECTION 1

POINT SOURCES

Emissions and source specific data for point sources are collected for the 2005 baseyear SIP inventory by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA.) The

primary source of data for point sources is facility reported STARShip files. STARShip

is a software package developed by Ohio EPA, Division of Air Pollution Control (DAPC),

to assist the regulated community in preparing and submitting a variety of electronic

permit applications and reports to the DAPC. These data are reported by the Title V

facilities annually as part of the emissions fee/inventory process conducted by Ohio

EPA and include emissions, process rates, operating schedules, emissions control data

and other relevant information.

The STARShip files are electronically transferred to the DAPC and stored into the

Division's Oracle database, STARS. The files are reviewed by the local air agencies

and Ohio EPA district and central office staff. After review, the data are imported into

Excel and linked with an Access® database to further process the information into the

federally approved National Emission Inventory (NEI) database format in version 3.0.

The files are quality assured again using the United States Environmental Protection

Agency's (U.S.EPA) QAlQC software for format and content. The data is finally

submitted to LADCO for emissions processing through the Emissions Modeling System.

The State provided inventory for Electric Generating Units (EGU) is replaced with the

Federal EGU inventory. The EGU inventory is compiled by U.S. EPA's Acid Rain

Program. It is based on facility reported emissions as measured by continuous

emissions monitors. In conclusion, the final point source inventory is a hybrid of the

federal EGU inventory and the state provided non-EGU units.

A major distinction typically made in emissions inventories is that between point and

area sources. In this inventory, point sources are sources for which individual records

are maintained for that source. Such records are maintained for all Ohio Title V facilities

(706 facilities statewide). The area source inventory accounts for facilities from nonTitle V facilities and calculates emissions information using surrogate emissions factors

based on energy usage, population, employment records, or other reliable data. A

more detailed discussion of the area source inventory is provided in Section 2. The

point source inventory described herein is considered to be the most current and

accurate source of emissions data available for 2005.

1.1 Point Source Process Emissions

Ohio EPA defines point source process emissions as those which occur at an

identifiable Title V stationary stack or vent. Point source emissions not emitted from

discrete stacks or vents are termed fugitive emissions and are discussed in Section 1.2.

4
1.1.1 Source Identification and Data Collection

The sources to be included in the 2005 base year inventory are identified using the Title

V STARS database. Facility production and emissions data are included in this

database. This information is facility-reported actual 2005 emissions.

1.1.2 Non-reactive vac Emissions Adjustments

This section is primarily applicable for VOC pollutants. Sources are required to identify

emissions of photochemically non-reactive Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC.) Based

upon this information, those emissions have been specifically excluded from the 2005

base line inventory in accordance with U.S. EPA's "Recommended Policy on the

Control of Volatile Organic Compounds." A complete list of the compounds that U.S.

EPA has identified as being photochemically non-reactive, and therefore not included in

the inventory, are listed below:

• Methane

• Ethane

• Methylene chloride

• Methyl chloroform

• Trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11)

• Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12)

• Chlorodifluoromethane (CFC-22)

• Trifluoromethane (HFC-23)

• Chlorofluoromethance (HCFC-31)

• Difluoromethane (HFC-32)

• Decafluoropentane (HFC-43-10mee)

• Ethylfluoride (HFC-161)

• Trichlorotrifluoroethane (CFC-113)

• Dichlorotetrafluoroethane (CFC-114)

• Chloropentafluoroethane (CFC-115)

• 2,2-Dichloro-1,1, 1-trifluoroethane (HCFC-123)

• 1,1,2-Trifluoroethane (HCFC-123a)

• 2-Chloro-1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (HCFC-124)

• Pentafluoroethane (HFC-125)

• 1,1 ,2,2,-Tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134)

• 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a)

• 1,1-Dichloro-1-f1uoroethane (HCFC-141 b)

• 1-Chloro-1 ,1,-difluoroethane (HCFC-142b)

• 1,1,1-Trifluoroethane (HFC-143a)

• Fluoroethane (HCFC-151a)

• 1,1-Difluoroethane (HFC-152a)

• Pentafluoropropane (HFC-225ca)

• Pentafluoropropane (HFC-225cb)

• Hexafluoropropane (HFC-236ea)

• Hexafluoropropane (HFC-236fa)

• Pentafluoropropane (HFC-245ca)

• Pentafluoropropane (HFC-245ea)

• Pentafluoropropane (HFC-245eb)

5
• Pentafluoropropane (HFC-245fa)

• Pentafluorobutane (HFC-365mfc)

• Parachlorobenzotrifluoride (PCBTF)

• Methoxybutane

• Nonaflourobutane

• Heptafluoropropane «CF3!2CFCF20CH3)

• Heptafluoropropane «CF3)CFCF20C2Hs)

• Perchloroethylene

• Cyclic, branched or linear completely methylated siloxanes

• Methyl acetate

• Volatile methyl siloxanes

• Acetone

1.1.3 Emissions Estimation Methodologies

Since source reported actual annual emissions are used in the 2005 base year

inventory, no estimation methods are necessary. The reports are provided to LADCO in

National Emissions Inventory Input Format (NIF) 3.0 format. LADCO imported and

processed the NIF files in EMS and applied temporal and spatial profiles to the annual

emissions to calculate weekday emissions rates. The final point source inventory is

split into two separate reports, the Electric Generating Units (EGU) which is the U.S.

EPA inventory for electric generating units and the non-EGU which is the state inventory

minus the EGU units.

1.2 Point Source Fugitive Emissions

Another type of emissions data which is required to be filed from point sources is

fugitive emissions. Before 1990, fugitive emissions were categorized as area sources

due to the lack of detailed information available for fugitive sources. However, since

these emissions are now electronically reported in the State's ORACLE database,

STARS, these emissions can be classified as point sources.

1.3 References

Getting Started: Emissions Inventory Methods for PM2.5 U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, September, 1999.

Emissions Inventory Guidance for Implementation of Ozone and Particulate Matter

National Ambient Air Qaulitv Standards (NAAQS) and Regional Haze Regulations,

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Research, Triangle Park, NC. November

2005.

Compilation of Air Pollution Emission Factors, Fourth Edition and Supplements, AP-42.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, September 1985.

6
Preparing 2002 Regional PM2.5 Emissions QAQPS PM Inventory Conference Inventory

Conference San Diego, 2003.

Documentation for the 2002 Electric Generating Unit National Emissions Inventory

(NEI). Eastern research group, Inc., 1600 Perimeter Park Drive, Morrisville, NC 27560

and E.H. Pechan and Associates, Inc., 5528-B Hempstead Way

7
SECTION 2

AREA SOURCES

Area sources are sources which are typically small, individual, numerous, and have not

been inventoried as specific point, mobile, or biogenic sources. For inventory purposes,

they are grouped with other like sources into categories that allow emissions to be

calculated collectively using one methodology. Since area sources are traditionally

defined at the county level, most methods are designed to estimate area source

emissions at the county level.

Ohio EPA has either used published Emission Inventory Improvement Program (EIIP)6

methodologies or selected other methodologies which are shared by other states. The

decision of which methodology to use was largely based on Ohio's data availability.

Data which was not available on a county-level is estimated by assigning a percentage

of the state's total activity to each county based on the state's population or employment

information. If Ohio county specific activity data is available through Ohio EPA or other

State Agencies, that data is used rather than allocating activity by percentage. Table 2-1

lists the sources which emit PM2.5, NOx and S02 along with the respective EFs used to

calculate each pollutant.

Table 2·1 Categories in the 2005 PM205 SIP Area Source inventory

Area Source NOx PM2.5 S02 Section

Commercial Natural 941b/MMSCF 7.6Ib/MMSCF 0.6 Ib/MMSCF 2.1 Gas Combustion

Industrial Distillate Oil 20 Ib/E3gai fuel 0.25 Ib/E3gai fuel 42.6 Ib/E3gai fuel 2.2 Combustion

Industrial Residual Oil 55 Ib/E3gai fuel 4.67 Ib/E3gai fuel 157 Ib/E3gai fuel 2.2 Combustion

Industrial Natural Gas 941b/MMSCF 7.6 Ib/MMSCF 0.6 Ib/MMSCF 2.2 Combustion

Residential Coal 9.1 LblTon Coal 3.8 LblTon Coal 31 LblTon Coal 2.3 Combustion

Residential Distillate 18 Ib/E3gai fuel 0.83 Ib/E3gai fuel 42.6 Ib/E3gai fuel 2.3 Oil Combustion

Residential Natural 941b/MMSCF 7.6 Ib/MMSCF 0.6 Ib/MMSCF 2.3 Gas Combustion

Residential LPG 13 Ib/E3gai fuel 0.17 Ib/E3gai fuel 0.1 Ib/E3gai fuel 2.3 Combustion

Human Cremation 1.01E+01 IblTon 0.0637 IblTon NA 2.4 cremated Cremated

Structure Fires 1.4 LblTon 10.8 LblTon NA 2.5 burned burned

Outdoor Wood Boilers 2.8 LblTon 2.76E+1 LblTon 4 E-1 LblTon 2.6

8
Residential Wood

Combustion

Non-Certified 2.80E+00 IbfTon 3.06E+01 IbfTon 4.00E-01 IbfTon 2.3

Non-Catalytic 2.80E+00 IbfTon 1.96E+01 IbfTon 4.00E-01 IbfTon

Catalytic 2.00E+00 IbfTon 2.04E+01 IbfTon 4.00E-01 IbfTon

2.1 Commercial Natural Gas Combustion (SCC 2103006000)

The 2005 total state-level commercial sector energy consumption is obtained from the

Energy Information Administration (EIA)'s State Energy Data System (SEDS), and

apportioned per county based on population4. Emissions factors are given in table 2-1.

The area source emissions are calculated based on an adjusted value by subtracting

the emissions due to point sources.

2.2 Industrial Fuel Combustion

Industrial Distillate Oil Combustion (SCC 2102004000)

Ohio's fuel consumption is apportioned per county based on the county's population4.

The area source NOx emissions are calculated and adjusted by sUbtracting the

emissions due to point sources. A heating value of 140 MMBTU/1000 Gal is used and

84,408 thousand gallons are consumed in 2005. [MMBTU stand for Million British

Thermal Units]. Emissions factors are given in table 2-1.

S02 emissions were calculated using EF 42.6 Lb/1000 Gal. PM10 and PM2.5 emissions

are calculated using 1Lb/1000 Gal and 0.25 Lb/1000 Gal respectively. All Factors are

obtained from AP_4219

Industrial Residual Oil Combustion (SCC 2102005000)

Ohio's fuel consumption is apportioned per county based on the county's population4.

The area source NOx emissions are calculated and adjusted by subtracting the

emissions due to point sources. 54,652 thousand gallons14 are consumed in 2005 and

a heating value of 140 MMBTU/1000 Gal is used. The S02 emissions are calculated

using EF 157 Lb/1000 Gal. PM10 and PM2.5 emissions are calculated using 7.17 Lb/1000

Gal and 4.67 Lb/1000 Gal respectively. All factors are obtained from AP-4219

Industrial Natural Gas Combustion (SCC 2102006000)

Ohio's fuel consumption is apportioned per county based on the county's population4.

The area source NOx emissions are calculated and adjusted by subtracting the

emissions due to point sources. 293,857 MMCF14 are consumed in 2005. The S02

9
emissions are calculated using EF 0.6 Lb/MMBTU. The PM10 and PM2.5emissions are

calculated using 7.6 Lb/MMBTU. All factors were obtained from AP_4219

2.3 Residential Fuel Combustion

Residential Coal Combustion (SCC 2104001000)

Ohio's household consumption of coal is apportioned per county based on county

population4

. NOx emissions are calculated using EF of 9.1 of coal. The S02 emissions

are calculated using EF 31Lb/1000 Gal. The PM10 and PM2.5 emissions are calculated

using 6.2Lb/Ton and 3.8 Lb/Ton respectively. All factors were obtained from AP_4219

Residential Distillate Oil Combustion (SCC 2104004000)

Ohio's household consumption of distillate oil is apportioned per county based on

county population4

. NOx emissions are calculated using EF of 18 Ib/1000 gallons

distillate fuel respectively. A heating value of 140 MMBTU/1000 Gal is used. The S02

emissions are calculated using EF 42.6 Lb/1000 Gal. The PM10 and PM2.5 emissions

are calculated using 1.08Lb/1000 Gal and 0.83 Lb/1000 Gal respectively. All factors are

obtained from AP_4219

Residential Liquid Petroleum Gas Combustion (LPG)

(SCC 2104007000)

Ohio's household consumption of LPG is apportioned per county based on county

population4

. NOx emissions are calculated using EF of 13 Ib/1000 gallons LPG. The

S02 emissions are calculated using EF 0.1 Lb/1000 Gal. The PM10 and PM2.5emissions

are calculated using 0.17Lb/1 000 Gal. All factors are obtained from AP-4219

Residential Natural Gas Combustion (SCC 2104006010)

Ohio's household consumption of LPG is apportioned per county based on county

population4

. NOx emissions are calculated using EF of 94 Ib/MMSCF. MMSCF stands

for Million Standard Cubic Feet. This source also emits S02 emissions which are

calculated using EF 0.6 Lb/MMBTU. The PM10 and PM2.5 emissions are calculated

using 7.6Lb/MMBTU. All factors are obtained from AP_4219

Residential Wood Combustion

NOx emissions from this area source are calculated for seven types of residential

heating units that utilize wood for fuel. They are listed below with the appropriate SCC:

Fireplaces without inserts

Fireplaces with inserts catalytic (non-U.S. EPA cert)

Fireplaces with inserts non -catalytic

Fireplaces with inserts catalytic (U.S. EPA cert)

Wood stoves - Conventional

Woodstoves - Catalytic

Wood stoves - Non catalytic

2104008001

2104008002

2104008003

2104008004

2104008010

2104008030

2104008050

10
The number of Ohio homes with fireplaces are adjusted for those that burn wood. The

following assumptions are applied to those adjusted homes:

92 percent of wood combusted in non-certified units

5.7 percent of wood combusted in non-catalytic units

2.3 percent of wood combusted in catalytic units

A state consumption value is applied which is apportioned to each county based on its

population4

• Table 2-2 shows the EF used for each of the seven types of indoor wood

burners which make-up this category:

Table 2-2 Emission Factors Used for Wood Burners

SCC 2104008002 2104008003 2104008004

SCC 2104008010 2104008050 2104008030

SCC 2104008001

RAPIDS Code Non-Certified Non-Catalytic Catalytic Units

S02 4.00E-01 4.00E-01 4.00E-01 Lb/ton

NOx 2.80E+00 2.80E+00 2.00E+00 Lb/ton

PM2.5 3.06E+01 1.96E+01 2.04E+01 Lb/ton

To avoid double counting of wood consumption for fuel, this category is adjusted by

subtracting the wood consumption from OWB to allow this category to account only for

indoor wood burning emissions.

Residential Wood combustion also emits S02 which is calculated using EF 0.4 LblTon

EF. The PM2.5 emissions are calculated using EF as shown in table 2-2. All factors are

obtained from AP_4219

2.4 Human Cremation (SCC 2810060200)

Not all Ohio counties possess a crematory so only those counties with crematories are

used to calculate the number of cremations and their resulting NOx emissions. The

2005 cremation data is obtained from the Ohio Department of Health, Vital Statistics17•

It is estimated that 3% of deaths occur outside the State of Ohio with no available data

to account for their disposition at the time this area source is being calculated.

Therefore, those deaths are not accounted for in this category.

The methodology does not offer an EF for NOx for this category nor is NOx required to

be calculated for this area source. Ohio feels that it is a combustion source and NOx

needs to be included in the inventory along with the other combustion sources.

Through its Permits-to-Install for human cremation, Ohio has selected a NOx EF of

10.13Ib/ton cremated to calculate emissions from this area source.

11
This source also emits PM, PM1Q, and PM2.5 emissions which are calculated using EF

0.1 LblTon, 0.071 LblTon and, 0.0637 LblTon respectively. All factors are obtained from

AP-4219

2.5 Structure Fires (See 2810030000)

The Structure Fires category includes residential and commercial fires resulting from

unintentional actions. Intentional fires, forest and wildfires, agricultural, and vehicle

burning are not included in this area source. The State Fire Marshall Office, Fire

Prevention Bureau15 provided data on the number of structure fires per county in 2005.

This area source is considered a combustion source for NOx emissions which are

calculated using EF 1.4 Ib/ton burned. The residential and commercial structures fires

for each county are tabulated and a fuel loading of 1.15 Ton/fire is applied. This source

also emits PM, PM1Q, and PM2.5 emissions which are calculated using EF 10.8 LblTon.

This factor was obtained from AP-4219

2.6 Outdoor Wood Boilers (See 2104008070)

Outdoor Wood Boilers (OWB), are also known as outdoor water stoves and outdoor

wood furnaces, are used as outdoor residential heaters. These boilers have wood

burning fireboxes surrounded by a water reservoir vented by a chimney stack. The

combustion of the wood in the firebox heats the water in the surrounding reservoir and

the heated water is pumped to the residence. OWB units can also supply residential

hot water. The water capacity ranges from 60 gallons to 764 gallons. The operational

design creates long periods where the fire smolders and creosote is formed13.

When the water circulating through the furnace reaches an upper set point, the air

supply to the fire is cut-off, cooling the fire so the water will not overheat. The furnace

operates in this "idle" mode until the water temperature hits a lower set point and the air

supply is re-established. The OWB may be in idle mode far longer than in operating

mode. This type of operating causes very poor combustion and heavy foul smoke. Most

of the smoke emitted is fine condensed organic material that does not burn under cool,

oxygen starved conditions. In addition, many owners burn green wood full of moisture

which also causes poor combustion12. The smoke created from these outdoor wood

burning units can contain several pollutants that are harmful to breathe, including fine

particle pollution such as PM 2.511 in addition to NOx (research assisted by Deborah

Lucas, DAPC intern, 2007)

This new area source category has many unknowns and variables associated with it

and Ohio does not possess accurate OWB unit sales data available to calculate

emissions on the county level. Therefore, several assumptions are made in agreement

with the Great Lake States in order to formulate a homogeneous inventory for the

region.

12
The assumptions are as follows:

• 100% of wood combusted in non-certified units.

• OWB units to be 90% in rural counties and 10% in urban counties

• 11.68 cords of wood consumption per unit per year (includes heating efficiency of

30-40%)

• 5 months heating season = 3650 hours (24/7)

• PM2.5 emissions factor (g/kg wood) =13.82 (Average of indoor and outdoor) or

27.64 Ib/ton of wood

The agreed upon methodology requires that total number of OWB sold in Ohio be

apportioned to each county based on rural or urban designation while observing the 9:1

ratio in area sales. The guesstimated factors (see above) are applied to calculate the

emissions from this outdoor wood burner. Total emissions obtained from this category

are subtracted from the Residential Wood Combustion category to allow for accurate

emissions from the indoor wood burning units.

2.7 References

1. Documentation For the 2002 Non-Point Source National Emission Inventory For

CAPS and HAPS. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Emissions Factor and

inventory Group. E.H Pechan and Associates, Inc. January 2004.

2. United States Census Bureau. Population Division.

http://eire.census.gov/popestldata/counties/tables/CO·EST2002/CO·EST2002-01-

39.php (Accessed 2003)

3. United States Census Bureau. County Business Patterns.

http://censtats.census.gov/cbpnaic/cbpnaic.shtml

(Accessed 2003)

4. Ohio Department of Development, Office of Strategic Research. Population Projects

by Age and Sex: 2005-2030. http://www.odod.ohio.gov/research/files/p200.htm

(Accessed August 2006)

5. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1999 Base Year Non-point Source National

Emission Inventory for Hazardous Air Pollutants, Research Triangle Park, NC.

September 28, 2001.

6. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). STAPPA-ALAPCO-EPA Emission

Inventory Improvement Program (EIIP). Volume III - Area Sources Preferred and

Alternative Methods. November 1996.

7. Documentation for the Draft 1999 National Emissions Inventory (Version 3.0) for

Criteria Air Pollutants and Ammonia. Area Sources. E. H. Pechan & Associates, Inc.

March 3, 2003

13
8. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, STAPPA-ALAPCO-EPA Emission Inventory

Improvement Program (EIIP), Volume III - Area Sources Preferred and Alternative

Methods, Chapter 8. September 1997.

9. Spreadsheet formulation provided by "Buzz" David Asselmeier, Air Quality Planning

Section, Inventory Group, Springfield, Illinois.

10. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). STAPPA-ALAPCO-EPA Emission

Inventory Improvement Program (EIIP). Volume III - Area Sources Preferred and

Alternative Methods. May 1997.

11. (Environmental Chemistry.com) viewed on Feb 8th, 2007.

[http://environmentalchemistry.com/yogi/environmental/200602outdoorwoodfurnaces.ht

m!1

12. (Washington State, Department of Ecology) viewed on Feb 8th, 2007

[http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/air/AOPPermits/Boiler/OutdoorBoilershome.htmll

13. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Reducing Pollution from Outdoor WoodFired Hydronic Heaters. Fact Sheet

http://www.epa.gov/owhh/pdfs/fact sheet 1 29 07.pdf (Accessed 1/2007)

14. Industrial Sector Energy Price and Expenditure Estimates, 1970-2001, Ohio.

Energy Information Administration. U. S. Department of Energy.

http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/states/sepprices/ind/prindoh.html

http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/pdf/pages/sec1 27.pdf (Accessed 2003)

15. State Fire Marshal Office. Fire Prevention Bureau, Columbus, Ohio.

http://www.com.state.oh.uslodoc/sfmlfirecont.htm (Accessed 2003)

16. Documentation for the Draft 1999 National Emissions Inventory (Version 3.0) For

Criteria Air Pollutants and Ammonia. Area Sources. E. H. Pechan & Associates, Inc.

March 3, 2003

17. Ohio Department of Health, Vital Statistics

18. Environmental Protection Agency. STAPPA-ALAPCO-EPA Emission Inventory

Improvement Program (EIIP). Volume X - Emissions Projections. December 1999.

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreportlvolume1 0/x01.pdf

(Accessed 2/2007)

19. Environmental Protection Agency. AP-42. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/

14
SECTION 3

NON·ROAD SOURCES

The non·road inventory is generated regionally by running U.S. EPA's National Mobile

Inventory Model (NMIM) model. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

undertook the responsibility of customizing the NMIM input files and submitting the

output file in NIF format to LADCO and U.S. EPA. LADCO processed the NMIM files in

their emissions model and generated daily emissions rates. Grant Heatherington from

the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources provided the following descriptions...

The National Mobile Inventory Model (NMIM) developed by USEPA was used to

estimate emissions for all other non-road mobile categories. NMIM consolidates nonroad mobile emissions and on-road emissions modeling into a single modeling system.

Only the non-road emissions modeling portion of NMIM was used in the development of

this emission's inventory. NMIM uses the USEPA's NONROAD model to calculate nonroad mobile emissions. The basic NONROAD algorithm for calculating emissions uses

base year equipment popUlations, average load factors, available engine powers,

activity hours and emission factors. Before NMIM was run, modifications and additions

were made to the NMIM input data.

a. Added emission factors for diesel tampers/rammers provided by E.H.

Pechan & Associates, Inc. Diesel tamperslrammers are a type of

construction equipment.

b. Revised PM2.5 ratios in SCC table to correctly calculate PM2.5 diesel

emissions. This error was introduced with NMIM2005 and didn't exist in

NMIM2004.

c. Revised gasoline parameters using updates provided by the states and

E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. Gasoline parameters include Reid Vapor

Pressure (RVP), oxygenate content and sulfur content.

The NMIM NEI NIF files are on the LADCO ftp site at:

ftp;llftp.airtoxics.org/inv2005/nonroad/NMIM/Base L ph2/20051

Revised NMIM2005 Input Data

Emission Factor Data

All States: Pechan revised the brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) emission factor data to

include diesel tampers/rammers (2270002006). The revised NMIM file is saved as

revBSFC.EMF.

15
Population Data

For 26000.pop, replaced default file supplied with NMIM2005 with 26000Jev_NMIM05.pop that

contains revised construction data missing from 26000.pop external file provided with

NMIM2005. This Michigan construction data should have been added with the other LADCO

states modified construction data but was overlooked.

SCC Data

The default SCC table of NCD20060201 is replaced by a version that contains corrections to the

PM25fac field that earlier NCDs contained (I.e. changed from 0.92 to 0.97 for diesel non-road

equipment) in NONROAD2004.

Fuel Data

LADCO States: Pechan revised four tables (countyyear, countyyearmonth, datasource and

gasoline) in the National County Database (NCO) used by NMIM to incorporate new fuel data.

AIR revised gasoline characteristics per instructions from the states. Also, gasoline

characteristic revisions for 2005 provided by states were incorporated. Additional revisions

were incorporated into 2002 data for non-road Stage 2 controls. Depending on the year being

modeled, different versions of the revised tables are used. Also, the countynrfile, countyyear

and datasource tables were revised to reference the new activity, allocation, growth, population

and seasonality files described above. NCO tables with names ending in "der' are default

versions of the table. See table below for the appropriate versions of the tables for the selected

years.

Non-LADCO States: The countynrfile, countyyear and datasource tables were revised to

reference the new activity, allocation and seasonality files described above. See table below for

the appropriate versions of the tables for the selected years.

Table 3·1 NMIM National County Database Tables for Specific Years and States

states

Years

1999 (WI only) 2002,05,07,08,09,12 and 18

LADCO states countynrfile_NMIM05_rev, countynrfile_NMIM05_rev,

countyyear_NMIM05_rev, countyyear_NMIM05_rev,

countyyearmonth_NMIM05_w countyyearmonth_NMIM05_w_05_12_18_rev,

_05_12_18_rev, datasource_NMIM05Jev,

datasource_NMIM05_rev, gasoline_NMIM05_w_05_12_18_rev

gasoline_NMIM05_def SCC_NCD20060201_rev (used when

SCC_NCD20060201_rev NCD20060201 is used)

(used when NCD20060201 is

used)

16
SECTION 4

ON-ROAD SOURCES

A mobile source of air pollution is a self-propelled or portable emitter of air pollutants,

and mobile source emissions are those generated by the engines or motors that power

such sources. Most mobile sources, except jet or turboprop aircraft, are powered by

internal combustion (IC) piston engines, and nearly all use liquid fuels.

Gaseous fuels, such as compressed natural gas (CNG) or liquefied petroleum gas

(LPG), had only a very small fraction of the motor fuel market in Ohio in 2005. Solid

fuels have not been used by mobile sources in significant amounts since railroads

retired their coal-powered steam locomotives in the 1950s.

4.1 Categories of Mobile Sources

For inventory and planning purposes, mobile sources are divided into two major

categories.

1. On-highway mobile sources (usually referred to as on-road), e.g., motor

vehicles such as cars, vans, trucks, buses and motorcycles used for

transportation of goods and passengers on roads and streets

2. Off-highway (usually referred to as non-road) mobile sources including:

• Modes of powered transportation that do not use roads, such as aircraft,

trains, ships and boats, and motor vehicles used off-road.

• Self-propelled or portable motorized machines or equipment not used for

transportation, ranging from construction equipment and farm tractors to

lawnmowers and hand-held power weed choppers.

Mobile Sources: All on-road mobile sources are self-propelled.

Non-road Mobile Sources: Some non-road mobile sources (e.g., farm tractors), are

self-propelled, but many non-road sources are not. A gasoline-powered chain saw is a

familiar example of a non-self-propelled non-road mobile source.

Stationary Sources: Not all movable or portable emission sources are mobile sources,

however. A small truck-portable cement or hot-mix asphalt plant, for example, may be

set up near a construction or road-building site. Such plants are classified as stationary

sources, not mobile sources for two reasons: (1) they may operate for weeks or months

at a single location, and (2) the trucks that move the plants do not supply power for

them.

17
NOTE: Not all Internal Combustion engines (IC) or turbine engines are mobile sources.

Fixed IC engines, such as those that power pipeline compressors or standby generators

in electricity plants and elsewhere, are also classified as stationary sources.

4.1.1 Categories and Components of Mobile Source Emissions

There are three categories of mobile source emissions:

• Exhaust or tailpipe emissions, which result from the combustion of fuel in the

source's engine

• Evaporative emissions, which result from evaporation of fuel from the engine or

its fuel system

• Refueling emissions

Exhaust Emissions: Are the result of fuel combustion and occur only when the engine

is running.

Evaporative emissions: Are Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) based only and are

continuously emitted from an engine's fuel system, whether the engine is running or not.

Gasoline is a very volatile fuel, so total VOC emissions from gasoline powered vehicles

have a large evaporative component. Diesel and jet fuels are of very low volatility, so

evaporative emissions from diesel and turbine engines are a much smaller part of their

total VOC emissions. Evaporative emissions for CNG or LPG powered vehicles are

negligible because their fuel tanks and systems are of necessity, sealed.

Evaporative and exhaust VOC emissions can be calculated separately for most mobile

source categories. Evaporative emissions do not include VOC emissions that occur

during refueling.

Refueling Emissions: These emissions are the third category of mobile source

emissions. Refueling emissions are entirely VOC. Although they result from the

evaporation of fuel, they are distinct from, and not directly related to, evaporative

emissions as defined above.

Refueling emissions have two subcomponents:

• Displacement emissions. These occur when new fuel is transferred into a partly

filled tank--be it a service station storage tank, a portable fuel container (gas

can), or a vehicle or engine's fuel tank; displacing the air in the tank and forcing

that vapor-rich air out the inlet pipe or other vent. There are two stages of

displacement emissions:

o "Stage I" emissions occur when the underground storage tanks at a

service station are being refilled;

18
o "Stage II" emissions occur when a motor vehicle (or gas can) is being

refueled.

NOTE: These emissions are covered in, "Area Sources," section 3.6.

• Spill emissions. These occur when drops of fuel drip or splash on the ground

during or after refueling and evaporate away.

4.2 Ohio On-Road Mobile Source Inventory

The inventory of on-road mobile source emissions was developed in conjunction with

the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT), Lake Michigan Air Director's

Consortium (LADCO), United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), and

the Ohio EPA (OEPA). Estimates of the amounts of NOx and VOC are reported by

county in tons per day. Emissions are reported for a typical ozone season weekday in

the summer of 2005.

4.2.1 Emission Inventories Developed with MOBILE6 Model

MOBILE6 Overview:

MOBILE6 is a computer program that estimates hydrocarbon (HC), carbon monoxide

(CO), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), exhaust particulate matter (which consists of several

components), tire wear particulate matter, brake wear particulate matter, sulfur dioxide

(S02), ammonia (NHs), six hazardous air pollutant (HAP), and carbon dioxide (C02)

emission factors for gasoline-fueled and diesel highway motor vehicles, and for certain

specialized vehicles such as natural-gas-fueled or electric vehicles that may replace

them. The program uses the calculation procedures presented in technical reports

posted on EPA's MOBILE6 Web page http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models.htm.

MOBILE6 emission factor estimates depend on various conditions, such as ambient

temperatures, travel speeds, operating modes, fuel volatility, and mileage accrual rates.

Many of the variables affecting vehicle emissions can be specified by the user.

MOBILE6 will estimate emission factors for any calendar year between 1952 and 2050,

inclusive. Vehicles from the 25 most recent model years are considered to be in

operation in each calendar year.

4.2.2 MOBILE6 Defaults:

MOBILE6 includes default values for a wide range of conditions that affect emissions.

These defaults are designed to represent "national average" input data values. Users

who desire a more precise estimate of local emissions can substitute information that

more specifically reflects local conditions. Use of local input data will be particularly

common when the local emission inventory is to be constructed from separate

19
estimates of roadways, geographic areas, or times of day, in which fleet or traffic

conditions vary considerably.

A list of MOBILE6 input parameters is provided below. Most of these inputs are optional

because the model will supply default values unless alternate data are provided.

4.2.3 MOBILE6 Input Parameters

• Calendar year

• Month (January, July)

• Hourly Temperature

• Altitude (high, low)

• Weekend/weekday

• Fuel characteristics (Reid vapor pressure, sulfur content,

oxygenate content, etc.)

• Humidity and solar load

• Registration (age) distribution by vehicle class

• Annual mileage accumulation by vehicle class

• Diesel sales fractions by vehicle class and model year

• Average speed distribution by hour and roadway

• Distribution of vehicle miles traveled by roadway type

• Engine starts per day by vehicle class and distribution by hour

• Engine start soak time distribution by hour

• Trip end distribution by hour

• Average trip length distribution

• Hot soak duration

• Distribution of vehicle miles traveled by vehicle class

• Full, partial, and multiple diurnal distribution by hour

• Inspection and maintenance (I/M) program description

• Anti-tampering inspection program description

• Stage II refueling emissions inspection program description

• Natural gas vehicle fractions

• HC species output

• Particle size cutoff

• Emissions factors for PM and HAP

• Output format specifications and selections

4.2.4 MOBILE6 References

The following publications provide much of the guidance for the preparation of the onhighway inventory.

EPA-450/4·81-026d (Revised), now EPAl450-R-92-009, Procedures for Emission

Inventory Preparation, Volume IV: Mobile Sources, December 1992. Hereafter,

"Procedures Vol. IV". The 1992 version is still the definitive document on

20
inventories. If a previous edition is referred to, the fact will be noted as, for example,

"the 1989 Procedures Vol. IV" or "Volume IV, 1989 edition".

EPA420·R-G3·010, User's Guide to MOBILE6.1 and MOBILE6.2: Mobile Source

Emission Factor Model, August 2003. This is the User's Guide for the official

MOBILE6.2.03 on-highway mobile source emission factor model and will usually be

referred to as the M6.2 (or simply M6) User's Guide (UG). The M6 model in its

various versions was developed and published by Assessment & Modeling Division

(AMD) of the National Vehicle &Fuels Emissions Laboratory (NVFEL) in Ann Arbor,

Michigan. The NVFEL is part of USEPA Office of Transportation & Air Quality

(OTAQ), formerly the Office of Mobile Sources (OMS).

Technical Guidance on the Use of MOBILE6 for Emission Inventory

Preparation, August 2004. Hereafter, the M6 "Technical Guidance [Document]" or

"TGD". The TGD is the primary source of guidance on M6 inputs and an invaluable

adjunct to the M6 User's Guide.

USEPA document "Frequently Asked Questions on MOBILE6", 16 January

2002. Hereafter, [M6] "FAQ". This document was published along with the M6

TGD.

USEPA memo, "Policy Guidance on the Use of MOBILE6 for SIP Development

and Transportation Conformity", dated 18 January 2002, from John Seitz,

Director of OAQPS, and Margo Oge, Director of OTAQ, to Regional Air Division

Directors.

4.3 Ohio's Alternate Data for MOBILE6

Alternative data is state-specific data that is used in the Mobile6 runs. Using local data

is preferred to using the default data in Mobile6. Efforts are made to collect as much

local data as possible.

4.3.1 Vehicle Registration Distribution by Age

Overview:

The vehicle age distribution determines the fraction of vehicles operating within each

emissions control requirement standard and the deterioration of the emission control

technology.

Emission rates vary widely between new and older vehicles. Thus, even small changes

in fleet age, particularly for older vehicles, may result in large changes in emission

totals.

21
The MOBILE6 model requires estimates of a distribution of registered vehicles by age

and vehicle category for current and future years. MOBILE6 default values were

developed using national level vehicle registration data by age and class for July 1,

1996. EPA developed a methodology to convert the July 1, 1996 registration profile into

a general registration distribution by age and by vehicle category for some 6 composite

(gasoline and diesel) vehicle types plus motorcycles. To project future changes, EPA

evaluated general sales growth and vehicle scrappage trends for the totallight-duty

vehicle in-use fleet and the total heavy-duty vehicle in-use fleet, and made minor

adjustments, where possible, to reflect some of the differences between vehicle

categories.

Description: The MOBILE6 model requires estimates of a distribution of registered

vehicles by age and vehicle category for current and future years. OEPA chose to use

local vehicle registration data provided by the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles (BMV)

which was sent to the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO) to develop

these inputs. LADCO then contracted with a subcontractor to breakout the age

distribution data from the Vehicle Identification Numbers (VIN).

Note: It was learned during the course of this inventory that there were some

discrepancies in the age distribution data. But it was too large of a project to reevaluate

the data prior to this inventory. This will be corrected in the next inventory (2008).

Method Applicability: This approach is most applicable in areas where there are

significant differences in the local vehicle fleet age distribution relative to the national

average.

Data Sources and Procedures: This approach involves using local vehicle registration

data. This is typically available at the county level, but may also be applied using

statewide data from the state motor vehicle registration office. The fleet age should be

representative of the vehicle fleet over the small urban or rural area under question.

Advantages:

• Uses locally specific registration data, which is likely more representative of the

local area than the national default.

• Requires minimal additional resources, particularly if data is readily available at

the county or local level from the State department of motor vehicle registration.

• Recommended by EPA and generally is encouraged as a preferred approach

over the national default approach.

22
4.3.2 Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled (DVMT)

Overview:

In coordination with Ohio Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), the Ohio

Department of Transportation (ODOT) provided Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled (DVMT)

data and travel demand model (TDM) data. TDM data will be covered in another

section. Because TDM results are used by the state and MPOs to forecast traffic for a

variety of reasons, undergo rigorous calibration and validation checks, and are sensitive

to roadway capacity/travel time improvements, the TDMs are considered the best tool

for emissions forecasting. Therefore, the DVMT data discussed in this section is not

used directly for all areas of Ohio. In counties where it is not used directly it is used for

making rough emissions estimates where models do not exist or where time prohibits

the use of TDMs. DVMT is a simple mechanism to measure how much traffic is flowing

along a roadway during an average 24 hour period. This simple formula multiplies

Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) by the length of the roadway. For example; if a

roadway is 2 miles in length and the AADT is 4000 vehicles per day the DVMT would be

computed by multiplying 2*4,000 =8,000 or 8,000 DVMT.

County-By-County DVMT is computed using the State of Ohio, Department of

Transportation's Roadway Information Files and the annual Highway Performance

Monitoring System (HPMS) Summary Reports. DVMT's are computed for all of the

Federal Functional Class (FC) categories within each of Ohio's 88 counties.

The AADT and Roadway length information provides a very accurate estimate of

statewide total DVMT for The State Highway System (Interstate, US and State Routes).

County total DVMT are consistent and considered a good source of county level DVMT

for countywide emissions estimates. For roadways that are not part of the State

Highway System, various representative counts were used, such as: railroad crossing

counts, HPMS Sample Section Counts, etc. All traffic count data that was not collected

during the current year has had statewide growth factors applied to account for

systematic growth.

Given the previously mentioned methodologies, the DVMT data is more accurate on

roads functionally classified as collector or above.

Table 4-1 Federal Functional Class Categories:

01 - Rural Interstate

02 - Rural Principal Arterial

06 - Rural Minor Arterial

07 - Rural Major Collector

08 - Rural Minor Collector

09 - Rural Local

11 - Urban Interstate

12 - Urban Freeway &Expressway

14 - Urban Principal Arterial

16 - Urban Minor Arterial

17 - Urban Collector

19 - Urban Local

23
Table 4·2 DVMT County Summary:

COUNTY SUMMARY: Adjusted County kOVMT's

(kDVMT:: Thousands of Dally Vehicles Miles Traveled)

TUTAlfC=07 FC=OO FC=09 FC=11 fC=12

!'JJVM'f 111M IIDVf,f'f hDlIMr iIDlIMT NJIIMT

2 ..3 0.0

2005 Data

COIJlfYNItfE

,

ASHLAND

ASHTABU A

, S

AVGlAIZE

BROWN

au LER

CARROll

CHAMPAIGN

fC=01

"',,'"

007.86

603.79

261.01

0.1l0

0.00

0.00

,."

FC=02

""'".6

334.94

2(11.06

239.72

. 2

473.5ll

171.43 ,." 167.72

fC=08

""'"

163,(16

273.05

11.55

1

227,85

101J.71

"'.W

113.43

318.62 68

247.87 76}8 125,48

441,31 109.T1 217.2&

28a.15 49.20 132.50

taus 38.1J4 194.20

33 .76 197. 254. 2

126,16 47}8 1111.52

253.04 44.37 142.95

1616".131 0.00 0.00

1852.17 129.74 43.84

974.13 81:33 41.31

1127.28 0.00 0.00

1~.56 1209.51 283.05

596.35 0.00 0.00

722.11 0.00 0.00

1.

170.72

222,24

1.

5.79

29.89

11 .03

0.00

6.51

FC=16

"'.'"

26.$$

2(11.80

101.53

6.

,no 1104.59 ,."

24.S6

fC=l1

",v",

,.

'"''' 35.$6

1 .2(1

1 2.13

4.59

2.01

14J8 '"

FC=19

""'",

21.05

386.78

41.94

T.

1.04

1249,92

0.00

4824

TUTAlU..'"

""'"

254.313

1(13$.6(1

8 .

396.03

1

35.52

1

O.OIJ

164.49

TUTAl-

"".'" 1870.39

2887.n

2

1370.16

1162.80

588.35

886.00

CLEf'MCNT 0.00 325.lJS 55.85 428.85 24. 0 2!l6.4 1121.32 awn 161.6$ 602.60 541.86 42,27 20022 2932.7& 4054.oa

. ,

2'!S2,15

.44

11J64, 6

28333.57

1319.9

. 3

1069.61

21.

367.21

! 23333.51

168.90

,.

111.16

3.

15J1

.65

100.89

125.1J8

1 . 3

71.28

4747.6&

1228

"'"

1.

.15

198.19"

2

306,22

24

1 .55

11J82.47

.71 ,"T29

., 225.16

.8

119.87

1."

.84

""8.98

41m.74

41.19

1 9. 1

341.11

.•

o.

"

. ,

294.84

27MS

34,00

3.40

4311.73

5.19

3.1

0.00 o.

0.00 163.$9

.S>

IJ.OO 3,6.83

,." 9 ,7 .0

,no

o.oa 154.88

,00 .00

O.OIJ 0.00

\1614.~ 815.31

IJ,OIJ .41

(J.oa .00

21J71.75

7aUl

1101.76

1238.20

6.

1543.09

1392,54

757.45

607.55

1150.69 '"

73!l.56

,.

11$.62

11 . 6"

,:

81.84

" ,

liG. 9

204.

179. .2

'.00 30021

182.7

,.

2'"

"."2.2 ,.31 150.

5.54

151.6$

139.

36.00 ,.00 134. 9

62.3\1

2 .

262,88

339.14

""" m.

342.53

1l.00

396,12

337.18

87

557.08

1 3

210,93

202.5"5

9 .52

56.15

"." 117,24

48.'

'",.

7.05

., 183.03

7 .

.6

265.05

182.89

82.69

0.01l

142.54

111.

IJ.GO

,.,

,.00

,.""

,oo '"

6 1.92 41.8

1lJl .

533,35

COLUlABII\.NA

C OOTON

CRAlllJfO

CUYAHOGA

DA E

, DEfiANCE

0.00 .98

<JEAV<JA 0.00 273A4

GKtCll,t 147. 182.

[~

Pog. 1 Seo I liZ At 0" 10 '" Coil PEe TRK EXT O"R I!ll

For PDF web based tables of 2005 DVMT by county see:

http://www.dot.state.oh.us/techservsite/availpro/Road %20Infor/KDVMT/vmt2005.pdf

Disclaimer by ODOT:

The above PDF web based tables contain the State of Ohio's adjusted county DVMT's

and road mileage for the years 1990 - 2005. Please be aware that the numbers are

estimates only. The factoring process used annual, estimated, and statewide ADT

(Average Daily Traffic) growth factors, derived from the output ofa limited number of

traffic counting stations around the state. Although the growth factors are available by

functional class, they are more reliable for major roads such as interstates or

expressways, which are relatively well-sampled, than for local roads or collectors. The

numbers also do no allow for periodic, large-scale functional reclassification actions

24
which reassign selected roads or road segments from one functional class to another.

The Ohio Department of Transportation therefore does not warrant the accuracy,

completeness, or reliability of these estimates for your research. We also do not

assume responsibility for any incorrectness that may occur.

4.3.3 VMT From Travel Demand Models (TOM)

Overview:

Travel demand forecast modeling is performed by the Ohio Metropolitan Planning

Organizations (MPOs) and ODOT for a multitude of purposes including the preparation

of regional emissions estimates. The ODOT Office of Technical Services' Modeling &

Forecasting Section recommends that Ohio's TDMs and ODOT's conformity analysis

methods be used to establish the roadway mobile source portion of Ohio's SIP budget

to assure consistent methods are used for transportation conformity analysis and

budgets. Therefore, ODOT provided both MPO regional TDM runs and statewide TDM

runs with associated data to OEPA and LADCO. The ODOT provided model run data

for years 2002, 2005, 2009, 2012, and 2018.

Data provided included loaded networks in both CSV format and GIS shape files, trip

end summaries, zone boundary GIS shape files, intra-zonal trip VMT estimates, and

VMT summaries for each of the loaded networks. Additional post processing data was

provided including but not limited to metadata describing the loaded networks, Hourly

distribution by functional class, speed profiles, day of week / weekend / monthly car and

truck traffic profiles, 2009 & 2018 VMT RPO data sets, statewide VMT growth rates for

local traffic, and a 2005 VMT summary comparison spreadsheet. It should be noted

that among other things, the loaded TDM Networks contain distance and daily volumes

from which VMT is computed.

Network volumes are post processed to estimate VMT by hour of day. The hourly

volumes and capacity, posted speed limit, and type of roadway for each roadway

segment are then used to estimate average hourly speeds needed for MOBILE6 based

emissions estimates. Modeling by segment by hour of day in this way makes emissions

estimates more sensitive to the effects of roadway improvements. This allows

transportation planners to evaluate the relative emissions affect of improvements to

individual roadways as well as packages of improvements and the entire set of planned

roadway improvement projects air quality impacts of construction programs.

25
4.3.4 Speed Distribution Profiles

Overview:

ODOT provided speed distribution profiles to LADCO. A couple of different sets of

speed distribution profiles were provided to OEPA and LADCO for their use, a table of

space mean speeds by functional class for use with DVMTs and link group speed

curves for post processing travel demand model traffic forecasts. Both sets of speed

profiles are based on the same speed study conducted by ODOT. The speed study is

documented in "Statewide Travel Time Study, May 2001 by Greg Giaimo, Ohio

Department of Transportation". When OEPA asked for speeds for use with MOBILE6

for development of CERR, ODOT provided a set of speeds based on that statewide

travel time study. Those speeds are documented in a technical memorandum titled

"Estimation of Average Speed by Functional Class for MOBILE6 Runs" dated

5/27/2004. Readers should refer to those documents for the details. Here the contents

of the technical memo, Estimated Average Speed by Functional Class, are summarized.

Space Mean Speeds by Functional Class for Use with County Level DVMT, HPMS:

The memo states that the speeds which the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT)

had been using prior to that date, 2004, for air quality analysis estimates based on

County DVMT summaries, were developed by a former ODOT employee for addressing

the one (1) hour standards conformity rules established due to 1990 emissions

exceedances. No documentation was found in ODOT's files on the origin of these

average speed values or how they were estimated. In addition, EPA has requirements

for using latest planning assumptions for air quality conformity analyses. Therefore,

ODOT believed that it was in the state's best interest to use the most recent available

data to provide a new set of estimated average speeds consistent with those used for

urban area travel demand models which were under development at that time. The

memo contains comparisons of 2002 speed data obtained from traffic count equipment,

automatic traffic recorders (ATRs) which collect data continuously throughout the year.

It also contains comparisons of the new speeds with those used to address the one

hour standard Gebhart's. The graphs shown in figure 1, taken from the memo, illustrate

the comparisons. The first graph compares time mean speeds from the ATRs with

space mean speeds from ODOTs travel time study done in 2001 and with the speeds

used for addressing the one hour standard.

26
-lIlI-1990 Analysis

Speeds

2001 Speed Study

Figure 1 - Speed Comparison Graphs

Speeds Comparison

80.0 -,-------------, r-.---:-A....,-r-ag-e7Spee'd-'I

70.0 -ho60.0 hr-~~=

-g 50.0 -1-~------~;;-­

8. 40.0 +---=:::::".~':-2-'-C:-:"';---..2

II) 30.0 -1-----"

20.0 -1------c

10.0 -1-----------

0.0 -!-,--.,-.,-r--,--,---,-,-,-,-,+-!

<;:)" <;:)fo <:;,'0 ,," ,,~ ,," «0 «0 «0 «0 «0 «0

Functional Class

Speeds Comparison

100 ,--,---,-----

80 +------

-g 60

Gl

Co 40 II)

20 -1---

0-1--,---,---,--...,-...,--,-.....,.........,.........,.........,....""""'"

Functional Class

--Average Speed

--Min. Avg Speed

Max. Avg. Speed

"""*- Gebhardt's Speeds

--Spd Study Est

Speeds

--Spd Study Greg Est

The following caution statement was taken from the_Estimation of Average Speed by

Functional Class memo.

CAUTION: It should be noted that speeds on facilities falling in anyone ofthe federal

functional classifications vary greatly between roadways, between hour of the day, and

day of the week. So these provide only very rough estimates of speed and should be

used with caution. In addition, it is expected that these average statewide speeds are

higher than the average speeds in the non-attainment areas because the non27
attainment counties tend to be more populated and more congested. The document

"Highway Vehicle Speed Estimation Procedures For Use in Emission Inventories';

September 1991 by Earl Ruiter of Cambridge Systematics Inc. is referenced by EPA's

documented procedures for emission inventory preparation. This document suggests

post processing travel demand model traffic assignment results to estimate average

speeds.

Final space mean speeds that ODOT provided are summarized in the Table 1 below:

Table 4·3 Speed by Federal Functional Class

Functional Class 1990 Analysis 2001 Speed Study

Speeds Speeds

FC01 57.3 64.0

FC02 45.3 53.0

FC06 39.9 53.0

FC07 35.1 43.1

FC08 30.5 43.1

FC09 28.0 43.1

FC11 46.3 61.6

FC12 43.3 61.6

FC14 18.9 29.3

FC16 19.6 29.3

FC17 19.6 29.2

FC19 19.6 23.8

It was decided by mutual agreement among individuals within the ODOT Office of

Technical Services that these new space mean speed based average speed estimates

were reproducible and defensible since they are well documented and should therefore

be the speeds used with HPMS** VMT if any year 2002 emissions budget work is done

using only the county level VMT summaries discussed in section 5.3.2 Daily Vehicle

Miles Traveled (DVMT).

** Note that HPMS VMT is a statewide VMT estimate and the county level DVMT

summaries are consistent with the HPMS VMT so the county level DVMT summaries

are loosely referred to as HPMS VMTs even though in fact they are not.

4.3.5 Link Group Speed Curves:

The ODOT Modeling & Forecasting Section recommends that Ohio's travel demand

forecasting models and ODOT's conformity analysis methods be used to establish the

roadway mobile source portion of Ohio's SIP budget for reasons already mentioned in

5.3.2 and to assure consistent methods are used for transportation conformity

demonstration analyses and budgets. Therefore, ODOT provided travel demand model

runs and the speed curves by link group that ODOT uses for the speed estimates within

28
the post processing of travel demand model runs for estimating regional emissions.

Table 2 shows these link group curves.

Table 4-4 Link Group Codes & Associated BPR Curves

Link Facility Free Flow Areatype a b

Group Type Speed

1 Freeway 75 Any 0.39 6.3

2 Freeway 70 Any 0.32 7.0

3 Freeway 65 Any 0.25 9.0

4 Freeway 60 Any 0.18 8.5

5 Freeway 55 Any 0.10 10.0

6 Multi-Lane 60 Rural 0.09 6.0

7 Multi-Lane 55 Rural 0.08 6.0

8 Multi-Lane 50 Rural 0.Q7 6.0

9 Multi-Lane 45 Rural 0.07 6.0

10 2 Lane Any Rural 0.34 4.0

10 Urban 50 Suburban 0.34 4.0

Street

11 Urban 50 Urban 0.74 5.0

Street

12 Urban 50 CBD 1.16 6.0

Street

13 Urban 40 Suburban 0.38 5.0

Street

14 Urban 40 Urban 0.70 5.0

Street

15 Urban 40 CBD 1.00 5.0

Street

16 Urban 35 Suburban 0.96 5.0

Street

17 Urban 35 Urban 1.00 5.0

Street

18 Urban 35 CBD 1.40 5.0

Street

19 Urban 30 Suburban 1.11 5.0

Street

20 Urban 30 Urban 1.20 5.0

Street

21 Urban 30 CBD 1.50 5.0

Street

Note: a and b are the BPR curve parameters for the equation

T = To{1 + a * (V/C)Ab]

29
More complete details about emissions modeling process employed by ODOT may be

found in ODOT documentations. The document titled "Congestion Management & Air

Quality Analysis (CMAQ) Program Documentation" dated December 2005 may be

obtained from the ODOT web site at www.dot.state.oh.us/urban/data/cmaq.doc

(Microsoft Word document)

4.4 Mobile6 Inputs:

The following table contains the inputs supplied to LADCO to process our mobile

inventory.

4.4.1 Ohio's 2005 MOBILE6 Inputs

The following tables are the result of a joint meeting between Ohio EPA, ODOT, and

MPOs from around the state. At that meeting Mobile6 inputs were discussed and

efforts were made to verify the sources of data inputs for Moble6. Dialogue has

continued between the parties.

For historical reference:

>>> Dave Moore <Dave.Moore1@dot.state.oh.us>4/10/20062:13PM»>

All,

An air quality coordination meeting has been scheduled for April 27, 2006 at 10:00 AM at ODOT Central

Office conference room GA. The primary purpose of this meeting is to discuss development of 2002

mobile source inventories for use in developing the Ohio 2007 8-Hour Ozone SIP Attainment

Demonstrations. See meeting agenda below. OEPA is working toward a June 15, 2006 schedule for

submitting the 2002 inventories to US EPA.

A key component of the meeting will be to review and confirm the MOBILE6.2 input parameters, by Ohio

a/q area, for use in developing the 2002 mobile inventories. See draft template below. The Ohio MPO

travel demand models will be used to generate the 2002 VMT inputs to MOBILE. Thanks, OM

OM

30
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The following tables are not to be used for inventory purposes

as the data is subject to change. For the current input table, contact Ohio EPA, Division

of Air Pollution Control.

Table 4-5 Mobile Inputs

Cleveland-Akron 2005 Ozone M6.2 Inp;;,.;;u;;.;;.ts,,-__

Includes the following counties:

Ashtabula. Cuyahoga. Geauga. Lake, Lorain. Medina. Portage. Summit

State Programs

I Input

Stage II Refueling

Anti·tampering Programs

93/3/86/86

96/78/50/22222/21111111/1/12/098.112111112

11M Programs Yes

Exclude Ashtabula County· No 11M program

Program 1 2004 2050 2 T/O OBO 11M

Model Years 1 1996 2050

Vehicles 1 22222 21111111 1

Stringency 1 30.0

Compliance 1 98.0

Waiver Rates 1 1.0 1.0

Cutpoints

Exemption Age 1 25

Grace Period 1 4

NO TTC Credits

Effectiveness

OESCfile

Program

Model Years

Vehicles

Stringency

Compliance

Waiver Rates

Cutpoints

Exemption Age

Grace Period

NO TTC Credits

Effectiveness

OESCfile

Program

2 2004 2050 2 T/O EVAP OBO & GC

2 1996 2050

2 22222 11111111 1

2 98.0

2 1.0 1.0

2 25

24

3 2001 2003 2 T/O ASM 2525 PHASE·IN

31
Model Years

Vehicles

Stringency

Compliance

Waiver Rates

Cutpoints

Exemption Age

Grace Period

NO TTC Credits

Effectiveness

DESCfile

Program

Model Years

Vehicles

Stringency

Compliance

Waiver Rates

Cutpoints

Exemption Age

Grace Period

NO TIC Credits

Effectiveness

DESC file

Program

Model Years

Vehicles

Stringency

Compliance

Waiver Rates

Cutpoints

Exemption Age

Grace Period

NO TIC Credits

Effectiveness

DESCfile

Program

Model Years

Vehicles

Stringency

Compliance

Waiver Rates

Cutpoints

Exemption Age

Grace Period

NO TIC Credits

Effectiveness

DESC file

3 1996 2003

3 22222 21111111 1

3 30.0

398.0

3 3.0 1.0

3 25

3 2

4 2001 2050 2 TIO ASM 2525 PHASE-IN

4 1975 1995

422222211111111

430.0

498.0

4 3.0 1.0

4 25

44

5 1998 2000 2 TIO LOADEDIIDLE

5 1975 2000

5 22222 21111111 1

5 30.0

5 98.0

5 3.0 1.0

5 25

5 2

6 1996 1997 2 TIO IM240

6 1975 1997

622222211111111

6 30.0

698.0

6 3.0 1.0

6 CUTPOINT.D

6 25

6 2

32
Program

Model Years

Vehicles

Stringency

Compliance

Waiver Rates

Cutpoints

Exemption Age

Grace Period

NO TTC Credits

Effectiveness

DESCfile

Fuel Commands

Fuel Program

Oxygenated Fuels

Fuel RVP

7 1996 2050 2 TIO GC

7 1975 1995

7 22222 21111111 1

7 98.0

7 3.0 1.0

7 25

7 2

1

0.00 0.42 0.00 0.036 2

9

Alternative Emission Regulations and Control Measures

Rebuild Effects

Calendar Year

Evaluation Month

0.1

External Conditions Commands

2005

7

MiniMax Temperature National Climatic Data Center

Vehicle Fleet Characteristic Commands

Registration Distribution Variabie

33
ICincinnati-Dayton-Springfield 2005 Ozone M6.2 Inputs

Includes the following counties:

Ohio: Butler, Clark, Clermont, Clinton, Greene, Hamilton, Miami, Montgomery,

Warren

Indiana: Lawrenceburg Twp., Dearborn County

Kentucky: Boone, Campbell and Kenton counties

I Input

State Programs

Note: Indiana and Kentucky inputs may not coincide with Ohio inputs

Stage II Refueling 93/3/86/86

Anti·tampering Programs 96/78/05/22222/21111111/1/12/098./12111112

11M Programs Yes

Excludes Clinton Co. and Miami Co., OH, Dearborn County, IN • No 11M program

Note: 11M inputs for Kentucky counties are not included

Program 1 2004 2050 2 T/O OBD 11M

Model Years 1 1996 2050

Vehicles 1 22222 21111111 1

Stringency 1 30.0

Compliance 1 98.0

Waiver Rates 1 1.0 1.0

Cutpoints

Exemption Age 1 25

Grace Period 1 2

NO TTC Credits

Effectiveness

DESC file

Program

Model Years

Vehicles

Stringency

Compliance

Waiver Rates

Cutpoints

Exemption Age

Grace Period

NO TTC Credits

Effectiveness

DESCfile

2 2004 2050 2 T/O EVAP OBD & GC

2 1996 2050

2 22222 11111111 1

298.0

2 1.0 1.0

2 25

2 2

Program

Model Years

Vehicles

Stringency

Compliance

3 2001 2003 2 T/O ASM 2525 PHASE-IN

3 1996 2003

3 22222 21111111 1

330.0

3 98.0

34
Waiver Rates

Cutpoints

Exemption Age

Grace Period

NO TTC Credits

Effectiveness

DESCfile

Program

Model Years

Vehicles

Stringency

Compliance

Waiver Rates

Cutpoints

Exemption Age

Grace Period

NO TTC Credits

Effectiveness

DESC file

Program

Model Years

Vehicles

Stringency

Compliance

Waiver Rates

Cutpoints

Exemption Age

Grace Period

NO TTC Credits

Effectiveness

DESCfile

Program

Model Years

Vehicles

Stringency

Compliance

Waiver Rates

Cutpoints

Exemption Age

Grace Period

NO TIC Credits

Effectiveness

DESC file

Program

Model Years

Vehicles

3 3.0 1.0

3 25

3 2

4 2001 2050 2 T/O ASM 2525 PHASE-IN

4 1975 1995

422222 211111111

4 30.0

498.0

4 3.0 1.0

4 25

4 4

5 1998 2000 2 T/O LOADEDIIDLE

5 1975 2000

5 22222 21111111 1

5 30.0

598.0

5 3.0 1.0

5 25

5 2

6 1996 1997 2 T/O IM240

6 1975 1997

622222211111111

6 30.0

6 98.0

6 3.0 1.0

6 CUTPOINT.D

6 25

6 2

7 1996 2050 2 T/O GC

7 1975 1995

7 22222 21111111 1

35
Stringency

Compliance

Waiver Rates

Cutpoints

Exemption Age

Grace Period

NO TIC Credits

Effectiveness

DESC file

Fuel Program

Oxygenated Fuels

Fuel RVP

7 98.0

7 3.0 1.0

7 25

7 2

Fuel Commands

1

0.00 0.42 0.00 0.036 2

9

Alternative Emission Re ulations and Control Measures

Rebuild Effects

Calendar Year

Evaluation Month

0.1

External Conditions Commands

2005

7

MiniMax Temperature National Climatic Data Center

Vehicle Fleet Characteristic Commands

Registration Distribution Variable

36
Other Areas (excluding NOACAIAMATS and OKIIMVRPC) Ozone M6.2

Inputs

Includes the following counties:

Ohio: Belmont, Columbiana, Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, Jefferson, Knox, Licking,

Lucas,Madison, Mahoning, Pickaway, Trumball, Wood

Fuel Commands

Input

Fuel Program

Oxygenated Fuels

Fuel RVP

1

0.00 0.42 0.00 0.036 2

9

Alternative Emission Regulations and Control Measures

Rebuild Effects 0.1 (0.30 for 2018)

Calendar Year

Evaluation Month

External Conditions Commands

All

7

MiniMax Temperature National Climatic Data Center

Registration

Distribution

Vehicle Fleet Characteristic Commands

Variable

4.5 Ohio's Mobile Emission Data Processed by LADCO (Lake Michigan Air

Director's Consortium):

2005 TDM and Mobile6 input data were provided to LADCO for processing. The data

was processed by LADCO with T3 to prepare it as an input into the ConCEPT model.

T3 and ConCEPT are described as follows.

37
4.5.1 T3··Development of Link·Level Mobile Source Emission Inventories:

Highly resolved emission inventories for on-road mobile sources are needed for air

quality modeling to develop the necessary technical support for new State

Implementation Plans (SIPs) for regional haze, fine particles, and ozone. Emissions for

on-road motor vehicles are estimated using vehicle miles traveled, trip starts and ends,

speed, and other activity data developed by State Agencies and Metropolitan Planning

Organizations (MPOs) using transportation demand models (TOMs), and emission

factors from EPA's MOBILE6 model. To support this modeling in the upper Midwest,

ENVIRON, working with LADCO, State DOTs, and local MPOs, has developed a

software tool (the TOM Transformation Tool, or "T3") that takes TOM output from

approximately twenty transportation networks using a variety of models, applies

appropriate data transformations, and outputs Iink- and county-level activity data in a

uniform format for input to the CONCEPT emissions processing model (a new

emissions processing model also developed with funding from LADCO). In a parallel

effort, analyses of extensive automatic traffic recorder (ATR) data collected by State

DOTs were conducted to develop temporal profiles (hour of day, day of week, and

month of year) of vehicle counts and vehicle mix by roadway type for developing the

detailed on-road emission inventories.

T3 provides a conduit from the projections of traffic demand modelers regarding vehicle

types, road networks, and vehicle activity to the activity data required by emissions

modelers. The primary goals of T3 are to provide an easy mechanism for incorporating

TOM model outputs in as "raw" a format as possible, while simultaneously providing a

great degree of flexibility in representing the TOM projections in terms acceptable to

most air quality models. These goals have been achieved through the use of a

dimensional transformation approach, where the dimensions of the various

transformations are user-defined - hence the name of the tool.

By Stella Shepard, Alison K. Pollack, John Haasbeek, ENVIRON International

Corporation, 101 Rowland Way, Suite 220, Novato, CA. 94945

& Mark Janssen, Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO), 2250 E. Devon

Avenue # 250, Des Plaines, IL 60018, janssen@ladco.org

4.5.2 ConCEPT··Consolidated Community Emissions Processing Tool an Open·

Source Tool for the Emissions Modeling Community:

The new CONCEPT (CONsolidated Community Emissions Processing Tool)

Emissions Processor is now available for use by the emissions modeling community.

Developed as joint project between Alpine Geophysics, LLC and ENVIRON Corporation,

with Midwest RPO and joint RPO funding, the CONCEPT model combines the best

attributes of current emissions modeling systems into an open source model highlighting

the following features:

• Open Source. Written primarily in PostgreSQL, the software required for running

38
CONCEPT is in the public domain. The model itself is GNU Public License (GPL)

compliant and users are encouraged to make additions and enhancements to the

modeling system.

• Transparent. The database structure of the model makes the system easy to

understand, and the modeling codes themselves are extremely well documented to

encourage user participation in the customizing the system for specific modeling

requirements.

• Quality Control. The CONCEPT model structure and implementation allows for

multiple levels of QA analysis during every step of the emissions calculation process.

Using the database structures, an emissions modeler can easily trace a process or

facility and review the calculation procedures and assumptions for any emissions value.

The CONCEPT model includes modules for the major emissions source

categories: area source, point source, on-road motor vehicles, non-road motor vehicles

and biogenic emissions, as well as a number of supporting modules, including spatial

allocation factor development, speciation profile development, growth and control for

point and area sources, and CEM point source emissions handling. The emissions

modeling community has already begun development of additional CONCEPT support

modules including CEM preprocessing software, graphical QA tools, and an interface to

the traffic demand models for on-road motor vehicle emissions estimation.

By Cyndi Loomis, James G. Wilkinson, Alpine Geophysics, LLC, & John Haasbeek,

Alison Pollack, ENVIRON Corporation. & Mark Janssen, Lake Michigan Air Directors

Consortium (LADCO), 2250 E. Devon Avenue # 250, Des Plaines, IL 60018,

janssen@ladco.org

4.5.3 LADCO Ohio Data Outputs for 2005:

The following LADCO outputs and documents can be found at:

www.ladco.org/tech/emis/net05/index.html

Table 4-6 LADCO Data Output r'-r

l

,·-·,--·I----···f--···- ~~~;age .'C;- -r-----i..··r-·--i-I---· '--5ourIY

I

' I Day unt, , ,

I~' VM VMT Y All I Raw ! Speed

I

' T (th' E P II t I M6 !POllut S IHourly Hourly Summ

3 M6! VS IS mou t umm T Vh ' an em 0 e a ' Sta •.. HP should iss! ants Dropped Run ary p. ry

te INetwork Descnptl Inpu !MS match on After I

VMT Summ Totals (pol,ve ral MIx (with

on DOC ts Exc conformi s Spec! ary (Short h, Summ Summ volum

I 'el ty Re at!on ) etype) ary ary e/ .

I inventory por I I I capaci

I I) t. I ty)

IoH]AKR.0N--riKRON'!?H "IO~[A:K~ON["[1'~-=~-- '-!l-rl'--f!'--li--'[t--[1--'

39
Additional Documents on LADCO Web Page:

"Comparison to EPA's Default Model NMIM"

"How we Build the 2005 Vmt/Networks"

"Spreadsheet/Graphics on Vehicle Mix"

"Background on the T3 Tool"

4.6 MPO Contact Table

Table 4·7 County Summary Table of MPOs by County

FIPS county Model Network MPO Contact Person

39001 Adams Statewide

Lima Allen County Regional Tom Mazur

39003 Allen Statewide Plannino Commission

39005 Ashland Statewide

39007 Ashtabula Statewide

39009 Athens Statewide

39011 Auolaize Statewide

Bel-O-Mar Regional Council Rakesh Sharma

and Interstate Planning

39013 Belmont Statewide Commission

39015 Brown Statewide

Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Andy Reser

CincinnatlDayton

Regional COuncil of

39017 Butler Governments

39019 Carroll Statewide

39021 ChampaiQn Statewide

Coordinating Committee of Eric Ottoson

39023 Clark Sarinafield the Clark Countv-Sarinafield

40
Transportation Study

Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Andy Reser

CincinnatlDavton

Regional Council of

39025 Clermont Governments

39027 Clinton Statewide

39029 Columbiana Statewide

39031 Coshocton Statewide

39033 Crawford Statewide

Northeast Ohio Areawide Bill Davis

39035 CUYahoga Cleveland Coordinatina Aaencv

39037 Darke Statewide

39039 Defiance Statewide

Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Nick Gill

39041 Delaware ColumbUS Commission

39043 Erie Statewide

39045 Fairfield Statewide

39047 Fayette Statewide

Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Nick Gill

39049 . Franklin ColumbUS Commission

39051 Fulton Statewide

39053 Gallia Statewide

Northeast Ohio Areawide Bill Davis

39055 GeauQa Cleveland Coordinating AQency

Miami Valley Regional Ana Ramirez

39057 Greene CincinnatlDavton Planning Commission

39059 Guernsev Statewide

Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Andy Reser

CincinnatlDavton

Regional Council of

39061 Hamilton Governments

39063 Hancock Statewide

39065 Hardin Statewide

39067 Harrison Statewide

39069 Henrv Statewide

39071 Highland Statewide

39073 Hocking Statewide

39075 Holmes Statewide

39077 Huron Statewide

39079 Jackson Statewide

Brooke-Hancock-Jefferson Mike Proprocki

Transportation Study Policy

39081 Jefferson Statewide Committee

39083 Knox Statewide

Northeast Ohio Areawide Bill Davis

39085 Lake Cleveland Coordinating Agency

KYOVA Interstate Planning

39087 Lawrence Statewide Commission

Licking County Area Matthew Hill

39089 Licking Columbus Transportation Study

39091 LOQan Statewide

39093 Lorain Cleveland Northeast Ohio Areawide Bill Davis

41
Coordinating Agency

Toledo Metropolitan Area SUjatha Mohanakrishnan

39095 Lucas Toledo Council of Governments

39097 Madison Statewide

Eastgate Regional Council RP. Samulka

39099 MahoninQ Youngstown of Governments

39101 Marion Statewide

Northeast Ohio Areawide Bill Davis

39103 Medina Cleveland Coordinating Agency

39105 Meigs Statewide

39107 Mercer Statewide

Miami Valley Regional Ana Ramirez

39109 Miami CincinnatlDaylon Planning Commission

39111 Monroe Statewide

Miami Valley Regional Ana Ramirez

39113 Montgomery CincinnatlDaylon Planning Commission

39115 Moraan Statewide

39117 Morrow Statewide

39119 Muskingum Statewide

39121 Noble Statewide

39123 Ottawa Statewide

39125 Pauldina Statewide

39127 Perrv Statewide

39129 Pickaway Statewide

39131 Pike Statewide

Akron Metropolitan Area Jason Segedy .

39133 Portage Akron Transportation Studv

39135 Preble Statewide

39137 Putnam Statewide

Richland County Regional John Adams

39139 Richland Statewide PlanninQ Commission

39141 Ross Statewide

39143 Sandusky Statewide

39145 Scioto Statewide

39147 Seneca Statewide

39149 Shelbv Statewide

Stark County Regional Dan Slicker

39151 Stark Canton PlanninQ Commission

Akron Metropolitan Area Jason Segedy

39153 Summit Akron Transportation Studv

Youngstown (partial Eastgate Regional Council RP. Samulka

county model of Governments

39155 Trumbull coveraae)

39157 Tuscarawas Statewide

39159 Union Statewide

39161 Van Wert Statewide

39163 Vinton Statewide

Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Andy Reser, OKI

Cincinnat/Davton

Regional Council of

39165 Warren Governments +

42
+

Miami Valley Regional Ana Ramirez, MVRPC

PlanninQ Commission

Wood-Washington-Wirt

Interstate Planning

39167 Washington Statewide Commission

39169 Wayne Statewide

39171 Williams Statewide

Toledo Metropolitan Area SUjatha Mohanakrishnan

39173 Wood Toledo Council of Governments

39175 Wvandot Statewide

NOTE: Complete MPO Information can be found at,

www.dot.state.oh.us/urban/mpomap.htm and at

www.dot.state.oh.us/urban/mpolist.htm#Cleveland

SECTION 5

MARINE, AIRCRAFT and RAIL (MAR) SOURCES

MAR sources are non-road sources which are significant enough in terms of emissions

to be considered separately from the rest of the non-road sources. The MAR inventory

consists of commercial marines, aircraft and locomotive sources. The marine and

locomotive inventory is generated by Environ1 under contract with LADCO and the

aircraft inventory is generated by Ohio EPA.

5.1 Marine Vessel Sources

The approach to commercial marine emission estimates needed to be flexible because

the activity data was available in many formats. Emission estimates were determined

either by multiplying engine power, load factor, hours per year of operation, or on the

basis of the number of gallons of fuel consumed.

Emissions were determined for ten subclasses of vessel types: Deep draft vessels

(DDV) at port, DDV mid-late, push boats (rivers/lakes), tugs, ferries, other special

(excursion) vessels, support vessels, dredges, commercial fishing, and military vessels

(Coast Guard). These were linked to various Ohio lakes and rivers.

Because of the large variety of methodologies employed, inventory tables for the ten

subcategories are detailed in the complete inventory prepared and published by

ENVIRON International Corporation: LADCO 2005 COMMERCIAL MARINE

EMISSIONS, by Christian E. Lindhjem, March, 2007.

Emission totals produced by ENVIRON were provided to LADCO to submit to EPA for

Ohio's State Implementation Plan (SIP).

43
5.2 Rail Sources

The primary activity unit used to determine emissions is gallons of fuel consumed.

Emission rates were derived from EPA documents provided as support documentation

for the 1997 locomotive emission standards (EPA, 1997). Gallons of fuel consumed

were based on rail activity.

Rail activity was broken down into four Source Category Codes (SCC). Class I, linehaul rail: Large interstate railroad companies like Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern.

Class I,ll, III, switching rail: Yard operations. Class II, III line haul: Regional and local

railroads. And Passenger rail: AMTRAK.

Class I, line-haul represents 84.3% of fuel used and the largest emission's category.

The complete emission's inventory was prepared and published by ENVIRON

International Corporation: LADCO 2005 LOCOMOTIVE EMISSIONS, by Christian E.

Lindhjem, February, 2007.

Emission totals produced by ENVIRON were provided to LADCO to submit to EPA for

Ohio's State Implementation Plan (SIP).

EPA. 1997: "locomotive Emission Standards." Regulatory Support Document, United States

Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Mobile Sources, April. And EPA 1997, Emission Factors for

locomotives," Environmental Protection Agency, EPA420-F-97-051, December.

5.3 Aircraft Sources

INTRODUCTION:

The aircraft emission's inventory is derived by taking the number of Landings and

Take Ofts (LTOs) per year and multiplying by an emission factor. In the Ohio inventory

when specific aircraft models and engine type emission factors are known they were

used. For the rest of the inventory the emission factors came from USEPA's fleet

average emissions data. Those results are then compiled as tons per year per pollutant

by county. The following describes the components, methodology, and concludes with

a description of an Access based aircraft emission calculator.

COMPONENTS:

I. Ohio Airports:

A list of both towered and non-towered airports in Ohio is obtained from the Ohio

Department of Transportation. See: www.dot.state.oh.us/aviation/ In conversation

with ODOT two individuals stated that the 164 airports listed covered over 90% of the

airports in Ohio. See Table 1.

44
II. Number of Operations/LTOs by Airport/County:

The OOOT list contained the number of operations a year per airport. An

operation is either a landing or a take-off. A Landing and Take Off (LTO) is required for

FAA EOMS calculations. LTOs were derived simply by dividing the number of

operations by two. These were totaled by county.

Table 5-1 Number of operations and LTOs for 2005

CounlY Airport Name ID Total Operations LTOslYear

Adams Alexander Salamon AMT 5210 2605

Allen Allen County AOH 32500 16250

Ashland Ashland County 304 49240 24620

Ashtabula Ashtabula County HZY 16886 8443

Ashtabula Gennack 7D9 840 420

Athens Ohio University UNI 51600 25800

Au,glaizc Neil Annstrong AXY 29456 14728

Belmont Bamesvil1e~Bradfjeld 605 10150 5075

Belmont Alderman 2P7 6150 3075

Brown Brown County OEO 5157 2578.5

Butler Butler County Regional HAO 61687 30843.5

Butler Book Field Municipal MWO 40050 20025

Butler Miami University OXD 16708 8354

Carroll Carroll County -Tolson TSO 34950 17475

Carroll Parsons 5D6 2674 1337

Champaign Grimes Field 174 23480 11740

ChamoaiJrn Weller 381 300 150

Clark Snringfield~Beckley Municipal SOH 64033 32016.5

Clark Mad River 154 15350 7675

Clermont ClemlOut County 169 35741 17870.5

Clinton Airborne Airpark ILN 52000 26000

Clinton Clinton Field 166 29360 14680

Clinton Hollister Field 2B6 161 80.5

Columbiana Columbiana County 020 31146 15573

Columbiana Koons 808 2546 1273

Coshocton Richard Downing 140 19550 9775

Coshocton Tri-Citv 800 8085 4042.5

Crawford Port Bucyrus 170 24871 12435.5

Crawford Galion Municipal 000 5216 2608

Cuyahoga Burke Lakcfront BKL 97100 48550

Cuyahoga Cleveland~Honkins International CLE 234356 117178

Cuyahoga Cuyahoga County CGF 79774 39887

Darke Darke County YES 9238 4619

Defiance Defiance Memorial DFI 9130 4565

Delaware Delaware Municipal DLZ 39300 19650

Delaware Packer 5E9 3181 1590.5

Elie Hinde 88D 1350 675

Elie Kelleys Island 89D 25495 12747.5

Elie Griffing~Sandusky SKY 112100 56050

45
Erie Wakeman 164 17324 8662

Fairfield Miller's Farm 7B4 360 180

Fairfield Fairfield County LBQ 43066 21533

Fayette Fayette County 123 29405 14702.5

Franklin Ohio State University OSU 134459 67229.5

Franklin Port Columbus International CMH 218438 109219

Franklin Rickenbacker International LCK 96200 48100

Franklin Bolton Field TZR 69149 34574.5

Franklin Columbus Southwest 041 11833 5916.5

Franklin Darby Dan 616 11260 5630

Fulton Fulton County USE 21123 10561.5

Gallia Gallia-Meil.ts Ret!lonal OAS 12200 6100

Geawm Gates 708 4200 2100

Geauga Geauga County 708 5350 2675

Greene Greene County- Lewis A. Jackson 1I9 37400 18700

Greene Bloom 141 100 50

Guernsev Cambridge Municinal CD! 6040 3020

Hamilton Lunken LUK 129430 64715

Hamilton Blue Ash ISZ 35000 17500

Hamilton Cincinnati West 167 30197 15098.5

Hancock Bluffton 507 71980 35990

Hancock Findlay FOY 19800 9900

Hancock Priebe 705 3850 1925

Hardin Ada 007 331 165.5

Hardin Hardin County 195 6562 3281

Hardin Elliott's Landing 074 1560 780

Harrison Harrison County 806 11900 5950

Henrv Henry County 7W5 15637 7818.5

Highland Highland Count'll HOC 18325 9162.5

Holmes Holmes County 100 21400 10700

Huron Huron County 5Al 10100 5050

Huron Willard 801 2715 1357.5

Jackson James A. Rhodes 143 6053 3026.5

Jefferson Jefferson County Airoark 202 15969 7984.5

Jefferson Eddie Dew Memorial 108 3540 1770

Knox Knox County 413 20150 10075

Knox Wynkoop 604 4691 2345.5

Lake Concord Airoark 201 4510 2255

Lake Willoughby Lost Nation Municinal LNN 45085 22542.5

La\Vfence La\Vfence County Aimark HTW 41910 20955

Licking Newark-Heath VTA 12457 6228.5

Logan Bellefontaine Regional EDJ 8325 4162.5

Lorain Columbia 408 5150 2575

Lorain ElYria 101 14300 7150

Lorain Lagrange 920 1155 577.5

Lorain Lorain County Regional LPR 62000 31000

Lorain Reader-Botsford Airfield 670 18700 9350

Lucas Toledo Express TOL 94600 47300

46
Madison Madison County UYF 41410 20705

Mahoning Salem Airpark 38D 16920 8460

Mahoning TriMCitv 3G6 10555 5277.5

Mahonin.e: Elser Metro 4G4 49232 24616

Mahoning Lansdowne 04G 750 375

Marion Marion Municioal MNN 42650 21325

Medina Medina Municipal IG5 79685 39842.5

Medina Wadsworth Municipal 3G3 4102.'; 20512.5

Medina Weltzien SkvPark 15G 79130 39565

Mercer Lakefield eOA 16212 8106

Miami Hartzell Field Il7 10200 5100

Miami Troy Skypark 371 4264 2132

Miami Waco Field lWF

0

0

Monroe Monroe County 4G5 3324 1662

Montgomery Brookville Ail"-Park 162 29359 14679.5

Montgomery James M. Cox Davton IntI DAY 134524 67262

Montgomery Dayton Wright Brothers MGY 89045 44522.5

Montgomery Moraine Airpark 173 12938 6469

Montgomery Dahio Trotwood 144 1853 926.5

Montgomery Phillipsburg 317 68000 34000

Morfran Morgan County 171 .';725 2862.5

Morrow Morrow County 419 19108 9554

Muskingum Zanesville Municipal ZZv 33312 16656

Muskingum Parr 421 16150 8075

Noble Noble County- Mike Brienza Field Il0 5950 2975

Ottawa Middle Bass-East Point 3W9 1300 650

Ottawa Middle Bass Island 3T7 6500 3250

Ottawa North Bass Island 3X5 1000 500

Ottawa Carl R. Keller Field pew 20890 10445

Ottawa PutMbl~Bav 3W2 15140 7570

Paulding Paulding 2H8 2100 1050

Perry Crooksville 184 400 200

PelTY Perry County 186 4550 2275

Pickaway Pickaway County eyO 35450 17725

Pickaway Clarks Dream Strip 031 2770 1385

Pike Pike County EOP 2012 1006

Portage Freedom Air Field 7D6 1623 811.5

Portage Farview 86D 3353 1676.5

Portage Mills 7E3 1050 525

Portage Portage County 29G 9621 4810.5

Putnam Ruhe's R47 13250 6625

Putnam Putnam County OWX 11910 5955

Putnam Ohio Dusting Co. 6e2 2995 1497.5

Richland Mansfield Lahm Regional MFD 57518 28759

Richland Shelby Community 12G 2012 1006

Ross Ross County RZT 50150 25075

SanduskY Fremont 14G 37450 18725

Sandusky Sandusky County Reeional S24 6148 3074

47
Scioto Greater Portsmouth Regional PMH 45830 22915

Seneca Bandit Field 5D9 140 70

Seneca Fostoria MetroPolitan FZl 7900 3950

Seneca Weiker 82D 320 160

Seneca Seneca County 16G 60165 30082.5

Shelby Sidnev Municinal Il2 20500 10250

Stark Barber 2Dl 13750 6875

Stark Miller Airport 4G3 8000 4000

Stark Beach City 2D7 6112 3056

Summit Akron Fulton International AKR 26000 13000

Summit Akron~Canton Remonal CAK 120441 60220.5

Summit Mayfield lD4 450 225

Summit Kent State University 103 72500 36250

Trumbull Braceville 4lN 425 212.5

Trumbull Warren 62D 14738 7369

Trumbull Youngstown-Warren Regional YNG 98298 49149

Tuscarawas Harrv Clever Field PHD 54880 27440

Union Union County MRT 31886 15943

Van Wert Van Wert County VNW 20516 10258

Vinton Vinton County 221 5225 2612.5

Warren Warren County 168 24951 12475.5

WalTen Red Stewart Air.field 401 16800 8400

WaYne Wavne County BJJ 96520 48260

Williams Williams County 0G6 10010 5005

Wood Wood County lG0 27405 13702.5

Wood Bordner 3D8 2200 1100

Wood Deshler Municival 6D7 2000 1000

Wood Metcalf TDZ 90700 45350

Wyandot Wyandot County 56D 7410 3705

III. Aircraft Models and Number of LTO/yr:

Specific aircraft models by airport (generally the larger airports) is obtained from "Table

7" provided by the United States Department of Transportation, Office of Airline

Information. This provided the number of LTO's for each aircraft model per year per

airport.

Table 2. Sample from "Table 7." This is the all community total of aircraft models for

the Akron/Canton area. "All Service" departures were used as the number of LTOs per

year for that model. Listed in the original table are aircraft model by airport and number

of services/LTOs.

48
TOTAL DEPARTURES PERFORMD

Aircraft Scheduled Non-Sched All

Model Service Service Service

A-318 1 1

A319 384 384

BOEING 717-200 3850 3850

BOEING 727-100 1 1

BOEING 727-200 5 5

BOEING 737-100/200 74 74

BOEING 737-200C 3 3 6

BOEING 737-300 2 2

BOEING 737-700/LR 212 212

BOEING 737-800 5 5

BOEING 757-200 4 4

BOEING 767-300/ER 4 4

CANADAIR RJ-I00/ER 542 3 545

CANADAIR RJ-700 2881 2881

CONVAIR CV-580 3 3

DASSAULT FALCON 7 7

DHC8-100 DASH 8 2 2

DOUGLAS DC-9-15F 13 13

DOUGLAS DC-9-30 6 6

EMBRAER-145 144 144

RJ-200ER/RJ-440 5519 5519

SAAB-FAIRCHD 340/B 1804 1804

ALL TYPES 15342 130 15472

IV. Emission Factors:

Where there was specific aircraft model data the emission factors were derived

using the FAA's Emission Dispersion Modeling System (EDMS). EDMS is a combined

emissions and dispersion model for assessing air quality at civilian airports and military

air bases. The model was developed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in

cooperation with the United States Air Force (USAF). The model is used to produce an

inventory of emissions generated by sources on and around the airport or air base, and

to calculate pollutant concentrations in these environments.

49
Table 5·2 EDMS Aircraft Emissions

Emissions provided by Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. (The few

aircraft in Ohio not included in the table had emissions derived by EDMS 5.0 in-house.)

EDMS Aircraft Emissions/LTO by Aircraft Type

EDMS 4.5 Emissions Inventory Report of 2005 Aircraft Inventory Emissions Factors

ii /JJ;DF020/'TIITi t ;,i;,;:,Qg/···,/,//i//ii,Y_i',',/';i ;eo'/;voeP'/;i;sot(/;; i'/'ii .-

5//

A-318 19.8 18.7 4.0 4.4 1.5 0.0 0.0

A-300-600IRlCFiRCF 27.1 56.4 2.0 2.2 4.0 0.2 0.2

A-300BlCIF-IOO/200 30.2 52.5 3.5 3.7 3.3 0.2 0.2

A-310-200C/F 32.6 52.5 7.3 7.9 3.3 0.2 0.2

A-319 19.8 18.7 4.0 4.4 1.5 0.0 0.0

A320·1001200 13.7 19.8 1.3 1.3 1.8 0.2 0.2

A·321 16.8 36.8 3.1 3.3 2.2 0.0 0.0

A-330-200 29.8 61.5 0.4 0.4 4.4 0.2 0.2

AVROLlNER RJ85 24.7 9.5 2.9 3.3 1.3 0.2 0.2

BAE-146-300 24.7 9.0 3.1 3.3 1.3 0.2 0.2

BEECH 1900 AlBIC 11.0 1.1 3.3 3.5 0.2 0.0 0.0

BEECH K1NGAIR C90 1.8 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0

717·200 11.7 23.4 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0

727-100 21.4 23.1 4.6 5.1 2.9 0.4 0.4

727-100C/QC 44.5 19.8 4.6 5.1 2.4 1.1 1.1

727·200 19.6 27.3 2.9 3.1 3.3 1.1 1.1

737·100/200 14.1 16.1 2.2 2.4 2.0 0.7 0.7

737-200C 13.9 17.4 6.8 7.5 2.0 0.9 0.9

737·300 28.7 15.9 1.8 2.0 1.8 0.0 0.0

737·400 26.5 18.5 1.5 1.5 1.8 0.0 0.0

737-500 24.7 21.2 1.3 1.3 2.0 0.0 0.0

737-7001LR 17.6 20.1 2.0 2.0 1.8 0.4 0.4

737·800 15.7 27.1 1.5 1.8 2.0 0.7 0.7

737-900 15.7 27.1 1.5 1.8 2.0 0.7 0.7

747-100 252.6 108.5 106.7 116.8 7.1 0.4 0.4

747·200/300 60.6 104.7 7.1 7.7 6.8 0.7 0.7

747-400 67.0 105.6 5.7 6.4 7.3 0.7 0.7

757-200 24.7 35.7 2.0 2.2 2.6 0.4 0.4

757·300 27.1 33.1 0.4 0.4 3.1 0.2 0.2

767-2001ER 32.6 52.5 7.3 7.9 3.3 0.2 0.2

767·3001ER 32.0 62.2 2.6 2.9 4.0 0.4 0.4

777 32.8 85.1 5.1 5.7 4.4 0.4 0.4

CANADAIR RJ100/ER 16.3 4.9 1.5 1.8 0.7 0.0 0.0

CANADAlR RJ-700 12.6 9.3 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0

CESSNA 208 1.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

CONVAIR CV-580 36.2 0.9 8.8 9.5 0.7 0.0 0.0

DASSAULT FALCON 13.7 2.6 2.4 2.6 0.2 0.0 0.0

DHC8-100 DASH 8 5.1 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0

DORNIER 328 JET 1.3 6.6 11.9 12.6 0.7 0.0 0.0

DOUGLAS DC·IO·IO 102.5 76.7 38.6 42.1 4.2 0.0 0.0

DOUGLAS DC-IO-30 45.4 78.7 5.3 5.7 5.1 0.4 0.4

50
DOUGLAS DC-IO-40 13I.S SI.S 30.2 33.1 6.0 0.7 0.7

DOUGLAS DC-8-63 263.5 25.6 219.1 239.9 4.2 5.1 5.1

DOUGLAS DC-S-71 53.6 34.6 3.1 3.3 3.7 0.0 0.0

DOUGLAS DC-S-73 53.6 34.6 3.1 3.3 3.7 0.0 0.0

DOUGLAS DC-9-10 14.1 14.6 3.7 4.0 I.S 0.2 0.2

DOUGLAS DC-9-15F 14.1 14.6 3.7 4.0 1.8 0.2 0.2

DOUGLAS DC-9-30 14.1 14.6 3.7 4.0 1.8 0.2 0.2

DOUGLAS DC-9-40 39.7 16.5 10.S 11.9 2.0 1.3 1.3

DOUGLAS DC-9-50 12.6 20.1 I.S I.S 2.2 0.9 0.9

EMBRAER-135 I2.S 5.5 1.1 1.3 0.7 0.0 0.0

EMBRAER-140 13.7 6.0 1.3 1.3 0.7 0.0 0.0

EMBRAER-145 6.4 6.S 1.1 1.1 0.7 0.0 0.0

EMBRAER-170 9.0 9.7 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0

F2S-4000/6000 76.7 10.4 77.2 S4.4 1.5 0.0 0.0

JETSTREAM 41 4.6 2.0 0.4 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.0

L-IOllOllI00/200 33.3 112.0 6.2 6.8 5.7 1.3 1.3

LEAR-25 75.2 0.7 7.9 S.4 0.2 0.0 0.0

LOCKHEED LIOO-30 4S.7 9.9 19.6 21.4 1.8 0.0 0.0

MD-ll 47.S 93.3 4.0 4.4 6.0 0.7 0.7

MD-80, 1, 2 3,7,8 16.3 20.3 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.2 0.2

MD-90 12.1 23.S 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2 0.2

RJ-200ERJRJ-440 16.3 4.9 1.5 I.S 0.7 0.0 0.0

SAAB-FAIRCHD 340/B 4.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 0.2 0.0 0.0

NOTE: Where specific aircraft model data was not available fleet emissions were used.

EPA default fleet average emission factors were taken from "Documentation for Aircraft,

Commercial Marine Vessel, ,Locomotive, and Other Non-road Components of the

National Emissions Inventory. 2005, see Appendix A, Aircraft Emission Estimation

Methodology." Specific model LTOs were subtracted from county LTO totals to

eliminate double counting those LTOs.

Table 5·3 Fleet Emission Factor Categories

Fleet emission factors were broken down into three categories. Itinerant General, Local

General, and Military.

Table 5·3a Fleet Average Emission Factors for Itinerant General Aircraft.

(Taken from: Table A-5)

Pollutant Emission Factors (Ibs/LTO)

HC 1.234

NOx 0.158

CO 28.13

SOx 0.015

PMI0 0.60333

Note: Air taxi HC emissions * VOCIHC (0.9914) conversion/actor = air taxi VOC estimate

51
Table 5-3b Fleet Average Emission Factors for Local General Aircraft.

(Taken From' Table A-II)

Pollutant Emission Factors (Ibs/LTO)

HC 0.394

NOx 0.065

CO 12.014

SOx 0.01

PM10 0.2367

Note: GA HC emissions * VaC/HC(0.9708) conversion factor = GA vac estimate

Table 5-3c Fleet Average Emission Factors for Military Aircraft.

(Taken from: Table A-17)

Pollutant Emission Factors (IbslLTO

HC 1.234

NOx 0.158

CO 28.13

SOx O.oI5

PM10 0.60333

Note: Military HC emissions * VaC/HC(1.1046) conversion factor = Military vac estimate

METHODOLOGY

Introduction

The following information was considered in the development of emission estimates:

1. Commercial scheduled and non-scheduled aircraft air carrier activity and

commercial air freight activity by aircraft model types,

2. General aviation and air taxi annual local and itinerant operations for year 2005,

3. Military annual local and itinerant operations for year 2005.

Due to the need to have aircraft operations information expressed as landing/take off

(LTO) cycles, the following assumptions were made:

1. For commercial aircraft and commercial air freight activity, the number of annual

aircraft annual LTO cycles was assumed to be equal to the number of

52
departures. The daily LTO cycle frequency was then obtained by dividing the

yearly LTO cycles by 365.

2. For general aircraft annual local and itinerant airport operations, each respective

operations total was divided by 2 to obtain the corresponding year local and

itinerant LTO cycles. The expected daily local and itinerant LTO cycles then

were obtained by dividing these annual totals by 365.

3. For military annual local and itinerant operations, each respective operations total

was divided by 2 to obtain the corresponding year local and itinerant LTO cycles.

The expected military daily local and itinerant LTO cycles then were obtained by

dividing these annual totals by 365.

Airport LTO cycles were further categorized into commercial aircraft by plane and

engine type, general aviation itinerant aircraft of unknown aircraft type, general aviation

local aircraft of unknown aircraft type, and military aircraft. This was necessary in order

to utilize the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration EDMS

Emissions and Dispersion Modeling System. Commercial and air freight aircraft

emission factors per LTO cycle were determined using EDMS for each commercial

aircraft type models where possible were used at each towered airport. Default

commercial aircraft engine type, and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) default

time in mode values for takeoff, approach, and landing roll times were used in the

EDMS model simulations.

For those aircraft types that could not be determined using the EDMS emissions model,

aircraft emission factors based upon EPA alternative fleet average procedures were

then used to estimate their emissions. These included general aviation and air taxi

itinerant aircraft of unknown aircraft type, general aviation local aircraft of unknown

aircraft type, and military aircraft. Conversion from total hydrocarbons to volatile organic

compounds was performed ancj based upon the EPA guidance.

APPROACH

1. A list of more than 90% of the airports was obtained from the Ohio Department of

Transportation. These were classed by airport, county, aircraft flight classification, and

the total number of operations per year.

2. The number of operations (a landing or a take off) were then divided by two giving

the number of LTOs per year per airport. These airports were combined by county for

the total number of LTOs per year, per county.

3. In dialog with ODOT it was determined that the following Ohio flight groups of aircraft

be combined to match the three categories used by the USEPA in calculating

emissions.

53
Itinerant (General, air carrier, commuter, air taxi, general aviation itinerant)

Local (General aviation local)

Military (Military)

4. LTOs for specific models of aircraft per airport were taken from the FAA Table 7.

See Table 2 above. These were then combined to give the number of LTOs per aircraft

model per county. Specific model LTOs were subtracted from county totals to avoid

double counting those LTOs.

5. Emission factors were determined from the FAA's EDMS program for specific aircraft

model and engine type. See IV. Emission factors above. The aircraft emission table

provided by Michigan has the emission factors for most of the aircraft flown in Ohio. .

Where specific aircraft model data was not available USEPA average fleet emissions

were used.

6. Emission factors times LTOs by county yielded tons per year per county.

Table 5-4 Pollutant by County (Sample)

County

ADAMS

ADAMS

ADAMS

ADAMS

ADAMS

ADAMS

ADAMS

ALLEN

ALLEN

ALLEN

ALLEN

ALLEN

ALLEN

ALLEN

ASHLAND

ASHLAND

ASHLAND

ASHLAND

ASHLAND

ASHLAND

ASHLAND

ASHTABULA

ASHTABULA

ASHTABULA

POLLUTANT

CO

HC

NOX

PMIO-PRl

PM25-PRl

SOX

VOC

CO

HC

NOX

PM10-PRl

PM25-PRl

SOX

VOC

CO

HC

NOX

PM1O-PRI

PM25-PRl

SOX

VOC

CO

HC

NOX

ACTIVITY(LTOSNEAR)

2605

2605

2605

2605

2605

2605

2605

16250

16250

16250

16250

16250

16250

16250

24620

24620

24620

24620

24620

24620

24620

8863

8863

8863

ACTIVITY(LTOSIDAY)

7.136986

7.136986

7.136986

7.136986

7.136986

7.136986

7.136986

44.52055

44.52055

44.52055

44.52055

44.52055

44.52055

44.52055

67.45205

67.45205

67.45205

67.45205

67.45205

67.45205

67.45205

24.28219

24.28219

24.28219

EM1SSIONS(TONNEAR)

24.552325

0.977285

0.136045

0.513114825

o

0.0157875

0.96314234

147.945065

5.841097

0.827189

3.081191265

o

0.0984575

5.769568254

173.67794

6.19414

0.94895

3.532515

o

0.1311

6.07175247

78.115087

3.042551

0.431593

54
ASHTABULA PM10-PRl 8863 24.28219 1.623493455

ASHTABULA PM25-PRI 8863 24.28219 0

ASHTABULA SOX 8863 24.28219 0.0520325

ASHTABULA voe 8863 24.28219 2.99420213

ATHENS CO 25800 70.68493 196.874985

ATHENS He 25800 70.68493 7.267183

ATHENS NOX 25800 70.68493 1.081521

ATHENS PM10-PRl 25800 70.68493 4.037266335

ATHENS PM25-PRl 25800 70.68493 0

ATHENS SOX 25800 70.68493 0.1420925

ATHENS voe 25800 70.68493 7.128180006

7. Emissions were then summed by pollutants in each county by SCC aircraft category

type so data could be provided to LADCO in the EPA prescribed NEI - NIF format.

DATA ERROR

The first aircraft emission inventory submitted to LADCO in April, 2007 contained an

error. The inventory submitted in May, 2007 has the error corrected. The error was the

result of a carry-over function in Access that picked up the number of operations as

instead of LTOs....which made the inventory exactly twice as large as what it really was.

ACCESS CALCULATOR

Introduction:

Our database programmer set up Access application to calculate Ohio's aircraft

emission inventory, and export those results to Excel. His utility allows for easy

modification of the aircraft data to match future data scenarios. Output to Excel also

allows for additional data manipulation and importation.

55
Interface:

GotDData:

cafcwatt:!'Emlssions: '

E~port EIn!Ssfoniii

IC!l

..J

..J

..J

Through this interface the following sets of data can be edited/updated: Airport activity,

emission factors, specific airport emissions, state/county FIPS, detailed aircraft

information, airport information, and aircraft SCCs. Once the final emissions have been

calculated and summed, then the data can be export via the export function on the Main

Menu.

56
Appendix C-1

Mobile Source Emissions

Inventory for the

Steubenville-Weirton PM2.5

Nonattainment Area
BROOKE-HANCOCK-JEFFERSON

TRANSPORTATION STUDY

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 2011-1

Transportation Air Quality Analysis and Technical Documentation

For the Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

State Implementation Plan Inventory Mobile Emission Estimates

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2•5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard

Submitted: May 2011

Revised: February 2012
Production ofthis Document paid for by funds from the U.S. Federal Highway Administration, Federal

Transit Administration, Ohio Department ofTransportation, West Virginia Department ofTransportation

and dues from BHJ member governments.

Prepared By:

Brooke-Hancock-Jefferson Metropolitan Planning Commission

The Metropolitan Planning Organization for

Steubenville, Ohio-Weirton, WV Area

124 North Fourth Street, 2nd Floor

Steubenville, OH 43952

740/282-3685

304/797-9666

740/282-1821 FAX

Email: mikepap@bhjmpc.org Website: www.bhjmpc.org
BROOKE-HANCOCK-JEFFERSON TRANSPORTATION STUDY

Transportation Air Quality Analysis and Technical Documentation

For the Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

State Implementation Plan Inventory Mobile Emission Estimates

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction Page 1

On Road Mobile Emission Summary Page 3

Latest Planning Assumptions Page 5

Travel Demand Modeling - Analysis Years Page 5

Social-Economic Demographics Page 5

Emission Factor Generation Page 9

Temperature and Relative Humidity Page 11

Ramp Fraction Page 12

Source Type Population Page 12

Vehicle Age Distribution Page 12

Road Type Distribution Page 21

Post Processing Page 22

Appendix A - Interagency Consultation Documentation

Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the u.s. EPA 1997 Annual PM", National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Pagei
Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

Table 9

Table 10

Figure 1

Figure 2

LIST OF TABLES

BHJ Region On-Road Mobile Emissions by State Page 3

BHJ Region On-Road Mobile Emissions by County Page 4

BHJ Region Representative Social-Economic Demographic Variables

By County 2005-2020 Page 7

Moves Inputs Page 9

Average Temperature and Relative Humidity Data Page 11

Ramp Fractions Page 11

Source Type Population for Year 2005 Page 12

Vehicle Age Distribution for Jefferson County, OH Page 13

Vehicle Age Distribution for BrookelHancock County, WV Page 17

Road Type Distribution for Brooke-Hancock-Jefferson Non-Attainment Area..... Page 21

LIST OF FIGURES

BHJ Geographic Area Fine Particulate Matter Non-Attainment Area Boundary

................................................................................................................................. Page 2

BHJ Geographic Area Covered by Travel Demand Model and Traffic Analysis Zone

Structure Page 8

Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville. WV-OH

For the u.s. EPA 1997 Annual PM,., National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page Ii
SELECTED ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS

BHJ - Brooke-Hancock-Jefferson Metropolitan

Planning Commission

CFR - Code of Federal Regulations

FHWA - Federal Highway Administration;

FTA - Federal Transit Administration;

LRTP - Long Range Transportation Plan

MOBILE6 - Mobile Source Emission Factor

Model

MOU - Memorandum ofUnderstanding

MPO - Metropolitan Planning Organization

MVEB - Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget

NAAQS - National Ambient Air Quality

Standard

NOx - Nitrogen Oxides

ODOT - Ohio Department ofTransportation

OEPA - Ohio Environmental Protection

Agency

PM - Particulate Matter

PM2.5 - Particulate Matter with an aerodynamic

diameter less than 2.5 microns (often referred to

as Fine Particulate Matter)

PMIO - Particulate Matter with an aerodynamic

diameter less than 10 microns

SIP - State Implementation Plan

STIP - Statewide Transportation Improvement

Program

TAZs - Traffic Analysis Zones

TCM - Transportation Control Measure

TDM - Travel Demand Model

TIP - Transportation Improvement Program in a

Metropolitan Planning Area

USEPA - United States Environmental

Protection Agency

VMT - Vehicle Miles ofTravel

VOC - Volatile Organic Compounds

WVDEP - West Virginia Department of

Environmental Protection

WVDOT - West Virginia Department of

Transportation

Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville. WV-OH

For the u.s. EPA 1997 Annual PM,., National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page iii
REVISION HISTORY

February 24,2012

Edit Page 1; Introduction; Paragraph #1 Revise paragraph into two sentences.

Edit Page 3; On Road Emission Summary Paragraph #1; Insert Maintenance Year 2022 with 2025

Revise; Table 1; BHJ Region on-Road Mobile Emissions by State; Add Maintenance Year 2025

Revise Page 4; Table 2; BHJ Region on-Road Mobile Emissions by County; Add Maintenance Year

2025

Revise Page 5; Travel Demand Modeling - Analysis Years; Add Analysis Year 2025 - Maintenance

Year

Revise Page 9; Emission Factor Generation; Paragraph #1 Add 2025
Transportation Air Quality Analysis and Technical Documentation

For the Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

State Implementation Plan Inventory Mobile Emission Estimates

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard

INTRODUCTION

This memorandum documents the air quality analyses and underlying planning assumptions performed

for the Annual PM2.5 on-road mobile source emission inventories for the Weirton-Steubenville, WVOH Metropolitan area State Implementation Plan (SIP). The Ohio Department ofTransportation

(ODOT), Division ofTransportation System Development-Modeling and Forecasting Section and the

Brooke-Hancock-Jefferson Planning Commission (BHJMPC) completed these analyses in coordination

with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA) and West Virginia Department of

Environmental Protection (WVDEP).

The BHJ Region is comprised ofthe counties of Brooke and Hancock in the north panhandle of West

Virginia and Jefferson in east-central Ohio. On January 5, 2005, the USEPA designated all three

counties within the BHJMPO Planning Area as non-attainment for the PM2.5 air quality standard. The

designation became effective on April 5, 2005; 90 days after USEPA published action in the Federal

Registry. Figure I displays the geographic extent ofthe Steubenville-Weirton, OH-WV non-attainment

area

The BHJMPC serves as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The MPO submitted the

necessary Travel Demand Model networks along with all land use and social-economic demographics.

The ODOT Modeling and Forecasting section performed the MOVES runs to generate travel demand

model based emission factors as well as the complete air quality analyses for the metropolitan area.

Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the Us. EPA 1997 Annual PM", National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 1
Figure 1

BHJ GEOGRAPHIC AREA

FINE PARTICULATE MATTER

NON-ATTAINMENT AREA BOUNDARY

LEGE flO

C tOIMTTAlUMEtlT AREA BOunDARY

M"M_ STATE eoUta>ARY

- counTY eoUllOARY

, T01fUtUHIP BOUtmARY

PliUUlCJPAlAREA

fllVERORLAKf

HGHWI,Y.& POLmCAl LfGEl10

- IJ3ROUTE

- STATfROll1:l;

':l$':""''''',:;'l

llI ".'''.. ..,e~~~.''''"""""".,,.,,, .O"OO,,~ a

..", •..,"""""""_00"""..""'.......,.."'....," "' .."e ". Ol'*,,,,,,,,,, "-""""""""lhu::ll"'<l,,"'" ..." :10""....

s

r (.j 8ml>k~""r",,,,~.,JllffAI'l'M , r..1"""""."1'·"'.·\1(,...·".·...", ...:t i, ~I.w.-"" ~"",I''';'''\ lO\'

WAYN

CRO sS.c

Transportation Air QuaiityAnalysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the u.s. EPA 1997Annual PM2.S National AmbientAir Quaiity Standard

May 2011; RevisedFebruary 2012

Page 2
ON ROAD MOBILE EMISSION SUMMARY

The Table I and 2 below present a summary ofthe pol1utant emissions including Fine Particulate Matter

(PM25), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Sulfur Dioxide (SOz) modeled for each county that make up the BHJ

Region. The Model Years for the demonstration includes the Base Year 2005, Attainment Year 2008 (a

leap year), Interim Year 2015, and Maintenance Year 2025.

Table 1

BHJ REGION ON-ROAD MOBILE EMISSIONS BY STATE

OHIO

Jefferson County

Year

PM 2.5

(tons/yr)

NOX

(tons/yr)

S02

(tons/yr)

VMT

(annual)

2005

2008

2015

2022

2025

WEST VIRGINIA

73.17 2105.85 18.18 562,071,084

60.97 1758.04 5.65 557,286,295

31.88 870.17 3.93 544,597,475

16.78 374.80 3.56 549,620,540

16.49 322.71 3.56 572,657,778

Brooke and Hancock Counties

Year

PM 2.5

(tons/yr)

NOX

(tons/yr)

S02

(tons/yr)

VMT

(annual)

2005

2008

2015

2022

2025

38.04 1023.15 13.59 393,012,357

27.93 772.27 4.03 389,998,556

13.50 323.71 2.87 400,179,462

8.82 158.47 2.50 390,998,315

8.44 114.56 2.36 391,153,545

Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville. WV-OH

For the u.s. EPA 1997 Annual PM,., National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 3
Table 2

BHJ REGION ON-ROAD MOBILE EMISSIONS BY COUNTY

Jefferson County

Year

PM 2.5

(lons/yr)

NOX

(lons/yr)

802

(lons/yr)

VMT

(annual)

2005

2008

2015

2022

2025

73.17 2105.85 18.18 562,071,084

60.97 1758.04 5.65 557,286,295

31.88 870.17 3.93 544,597,475

16.78 374.80 3.56 549,620,540

16.49 322.71 3.56 572,657,778

Brooke County

Year

PM 2.5

(lonsJyr)

NOX

(lons/yr)

802

(lonslyr)

VMT

(annual)

2005

2008

2015

2022

2025

19.41 540.40 7.01 212,244,639

14.42 412.02 2.11 212,778,859

6.97 174.71 1.51 219,881,355

4.55 86.23 1.33 215,917,336

4.34 62.47 1.26 216,619,184

Hancock County

Year

PM 2.5

(lonslyr)

NOX

(lonsJyr)

802

(lons/yr)

VMT

(annual)

2005

2008

2015

2022

2025

18.63 482.75 6.58 180,767,718

13.51 360.25 1.92 177,219,697

6.53 149.00 1.36 180,298,107

4.28 72.24 1.17 175,080,979

4.10 52.09 1.10 174,534,361

Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the u.s. EPA 1997Annual PM,., National AmbientAir Quality Standard

May20JI; RevisedFebruary 2012 Page 4
LATEST PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS

The annual PM2.5 inventory runs meet the latest planning assumption requirement. This report will

present the latest population and land use data available that calibrated the modeling process used to

calculate the vehicle emissions for the mobile emissions budgets as well as the input values for U.S.

EPA's most recent emissions software MOVES for this attainment demonstration.

A series of conference calls held in November 2010 and February 2011 by the Interagency Consultancy

Group established two parameters. First, that this re-designation effort will require the use ofU.S.

EPA's most recent emissions software MOVES for all mobile source emission analyses and second, the

annual emission estimates will be based a single-season approach. The group also decided that since

travel demand models produce average daily conditions, the daily emissions estimates are multiplied by

365 days to produce annual emissions estimates expressed in tons per year.

TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING - ANALYSIS YEARS

A Travel Demand Model (TDM) is the traditional forecasting tool used to examine potential changes in

future travel patterns for a specific study area, in this case the Brooke-Hancock-Jefferson Metropolitan

Area. The BHJ MPO, with the assistance of ODOT Modeling & Forecasting, maintains a validated

region-wide TDM that employs a four-step modeling process consisting of trip generation, trip

distribution, mode choice, and route assignment performed with the Cube Voyager software package.

The model Outputs generated from the TDM are link-by-link directional 24-hour traffic volumes for

simulating Base Year and Horizon Year travel patterns generated by the LRTP transportation network.

The current BHJ TDM Validation Year is 2000. The model uses comparable Average Daily Traffic

count data, updated social-economic variables for each ofthe analysis years by either updating existing

or known land use commitment for 2008,2009, and 2014, or projected 2014 and 2020 variables based

on a straight-line extrapolation between 2009 set of variables and the Horizon Year 2030 variables.

These networks represent all planned federal-aid projects as well as any regionally significant projects

found in the BHJ TIP and LRTP expected to be open for traffic by the end of each respective analysis

year.

The interagency consultation process, as previously discussed, established the following model years for

Brooke and Hancock counties, WV and Jefferson County, OH that reflected the most recent

correspondence from the U.S. EPA:

• Analysis Year 2005 - Baseline Emissions

• Analysis Year 2008 - Attainment Year

• Analysis Year 2015 -Interim Year

• Analysis Year 2022 - Maintenance Year

• Analysis Year 2025 - Maintenance Year

SOCIAL-ECONOMIC DEMOGRAPHICS

Identifying projected growth centers and understanding urban and rural population changes are essential

to determine future transportation needs in a given study area. Critical elements include an

understanding of the past and anticipated future shifts in the region's economy, population, land use

Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the u.s. EPA 1997 Annual PM,., National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 5
patterns, and other environmental factors over time. In turn, these factors are useful for predicting future

transportation patterns and justify transportation improvements over the next twenty years.

Travel forecasting procedures require the user delineate the TDM study area into geographic areas called

Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs). Typically, TAZs are based on factors such as land use, area types

(urban, suburban or rural), or political government units such as cities, villages, or townships. TAZs

represent centers oftravel generators or attractors based on a set of demographic variables. The

BHJMPO collects and reviews the TDM independent variables that characterize current and future

estimates ofthe metropolitan area's social and economic activity that may influence land-use

development patterns. In all, there are 376 TAZs in the BHJ model represented by 60 TAZs for Brooke

County, 78 TAZs for Hancock County, and 237 TAZs for Jefferson County. Figure 2 displays the BHJ

MPO geography covered by the Steubenville-Weirton Travel Demand Model (the entire three-county

area) including the Traffic Analysis Zone structure. The computer-based TDM for the SteubenvilleWeirton Metropolitan Area highway network employs the following land use variables:

• [AREAJYPE] ;: Area Type

• [AVG]ARK];: Average parking cost

• [ENROLL] ;: School enrollment classified by Private [ENROLL]RIV], Public

[ENROLL]00] and Post-secondary [ENROLL_UNIV] schools

• [HOTEL_RM] ;: Hotel Rooms

• [MED_HHINC] ;: Median household income

• [POP];: Population

• [POP 18];: Population 18 years or less

• [POP_GRP] ;: Population residing in Group Quarters

• [TOTEMP] ;: Total Employment grouped by the North American Industrial Classification

System (NAICS)

• [TOT_HH] ;: Occupied housing

• [TOT_VEH];: Vehicles available per household

• [WORKERS];: Workers per household

Table 3 is a set of demographic variables developed for the most recent 2006 24-Hour PM2.5 National

Ambient Air Quality Standard for the Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH non-attainment area compiled

September 2010.

Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenvi/le, WV-OH

For the U.S EPA 1997 Annual PM,., National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 20Il; RevisedFebruary 2012 Page 6
Table 3

BHJREGION

REPRESENTATIVE SOCIAL-ECONOMIC DEMOGRAPHIC

VARIABLES BY COUNTY 2005-2020

Variable by Year County Total

Brooke, WV Hancock, WV Jefferson, OH

2005 Population 24,696 32,572 69,457 126,725

2005 Households 9,976 13,714 28,472 52,162

2005 Employment 8,351 12,958 23,263 44,572 .

2008 Population 24,602 31,971 67,643 124,216

2008 Households 9,912 13,441 27,592 50,945

2008 Employment 8,234 10,736 23,676 42,646

..

2014 Population 24,431 30,965 64,381 119,777

2014 Households 9,813 13,007 26,134 48,954

2014 Employment 8,145 13,047 21,819 43,011 ....

2020 Population 24,253 29,790 60,934 114,977

2020 Households 9,694 12,488 24,532 46,714

2020 Employment 7,770 12,252 21,551 41,573

Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S EPA 1997 Annual PM, 5 National Ambient Air Quality Standnrd

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 7
,

EJJTRAfFlCZOUE BOUUOARY

~:~ ~Are BOUNDARY

-- COutfTY 60ulmARY

---•. rowt~~tt1P BOut(QARY

'oUJ'/flClPALAR£A

COIUf;RVAllOfUREA

~fi'1i0) RlVEROR LAKE

Figure 2

BHJ GEOGRAPHIC AREA

COVERED Y TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL

AND TRAFFI ANALYSIS ZONE STRUCTURE

LEGEND

~C<O,

l\."tJ~"",,,,,,,,~,,"'~I~,,,,,,,,,,,.,,t""""

00.,.,..,,; ~.;.."" n"":.."".... "111101:1.. 7~~ 0::.0 .. .." ;'ll••".~ ~~....,,,• .,,. _ ....n"'.... ,., ....""l

,.-....'0:1 """'.

,

Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the u.s. EPA 1997 Annual PM,., National AmbientAir Quality Standard

May 2011; RevisedFebruary 2012 PageS
EMISSION FACTOR GENERATION

The MOVES model generated the emission factor files were for base year-2005 and attainment year2008 representing the transportation improvement programs implemented in the BHJ Region. The

model also generated emission factors for two future year scenarios 2015, 2022, and 2025.

Table 4 summarizes the settings used in the MOVES run specification file and the MOVES CountyData Manager. The subsequent tables provide the specific inputs that are not using the MOVES default

values.

Table 4

MOVES INPUTS

RunSpec Parameter Settings

MOVES Version 8/2612010

Scale Custom Domain

MOVES Modeling Technique Emission Factor Method

Rates per Distance

Rates per Vehicle

Time Span Time Aggregation: Hour

1 Month representing average annual temperatures

All hours of day selected

16 speed bins

Weekdays only

Geographic Bounds Brooke, Hancock, and Jefferson counties

Vehicles/Equipment All source types, gasoline and diesel

Road Type All road types including off-network

Pollutants and Processes NOx, All PMz.5 categories, SOz, Total Energy Consumption

Strategies None

General Output Units - grams, joules and miles

Output Emissions Time hour, Location custom area, on-road emission rates by road

type and source use type

Advance Performance None

Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the u.s. EPA 1997 Annual PM,s National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 9
Table 4 (continued)

MOVES INPUTS

County Data Manager Sources

Source Type Population Combination oflocal and default data

Local data (Ohio and West Virginia) from motor vehicle registration

Default data used for source types 51, 52, 53, 61, and 62

Future year growth rate based on MPO model Household growth rate

Vehicle Type VMT Combination oflocal and default data

HPMSVTypeYear VMT - daily VMT from travel demand model

monthVMTFraction = default

dayVMTFraction=default

hourVMTFraction=local

IIM Program None

Fuel Formulation Default

Fuel Supply Default

Metereology Data Local data obtained from NOAA National Climatic Data Center. Data

will consist ofmonthly high and low temperatures and daily relative

humidity for 2002.

Ramo Fraction Using the base year travel demand model for VHT fractions.

Future fractions will be assumed constant

Road Type Distribution Use ODOT and WV Division ofHighways county summary VMT

categorized by federal functional classes

Age Distribution Combination oflocal and default data.

Local data (Ohio and West Virginia) from motor vehicle registration

Default data used for source types 41, 42, 43, 51, 52, 53, 61, and 62

The same age distribution will be used for all analysis years

Average Speed Distribution Default

Alternative Fuel Type Default

TEMPERATURE AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY

The single season approach for temperature and relative humidity uses weather data collected by the

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Climatic Data Center (NCDC).

The data used in this report, taken from the Pittsburgh International Airport collection center, is

representative of 12 months in 2009. Data entered into a spreadsheet provided by U.S. EPA converted

the Mobile6 to get the correct data for the MOVES model. Listed in the table below are the average

annual hourly temperatures and relative humidity distribution profiles for the Weirton-Steubenville,

WV-OH metropolitan area.

Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the Us. EPA 1997Annual PM2.s National AmbientAir Quality Standard

May 2011; RevisedFebruary 2012 Page 10
Table 5

AVERAGE TEMPERATURE AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY DATA

TIME OF DAY AVGHOURLY AVG HOURLY RELATIVE

TEMPERATURE HUMIDITY

Midnight 47.20 79.7%

1:00AM 46.10 67.1%

2:00AM 45.20 80.7%

3:00AM 44.60 82.9%

4:00AM 44.10 83.8%

5:00AM 43.60 84.1%

6:00AM 43.10 82.6%

7:00AM 43.50 79.6%

8:00AM 45.90 74.8%

9:00AM 49.60 70.1%

10:00 AM 53.50 65.7%

11:00 AM 56.80 62.0%

NOON 59.70 59.8%

1:00 PM 61.30 58.2%

2:00PM 61.90 57.4%

3:00PM 62.00 57.3%

4:00PM 61.60 58.3%

5:00 PM 60.50 61.2%

6:00PM 58.60 65.3%

7:00PM 56.20 69.2%

8:00PM 53.70 66.1%

9:00PM 51.60 74.3%

10:00 PM 50.10 75.7%

11:00 PM 48.60 78.1%

RAMP FRACTION

The Base Year Travel Demand Model used the Vehicles Hour of Travel (VHT) fractions to derive the

Ramp Fractions shown in Table 6. The future year networks also used the base year fractions.

Table 6

RAMP FRACTIONS

roadTVDeID roadDesc rampFraction

2 Rural Restricted Access 0.02

4 Urban Restricted Access 0.09

Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the u.s. EPA 1997 Annual PM" National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 11
SOURCE TYPE POPULATION

A combination oflocal and MOVES default data is the Source Type Population for vehicle

classifications. The MOVES default values provided the data for Source Type Population 51, 52, 53,

61, and 62 while local data from Ohio and West Virginia motor vehicle registrations accounted for all

other Source Type PopUlation needed to run the MOVES model. Table 7 shows the Source Type

Population identifications, the corresponding Source Type Name, and the number ofvehicles analyzed

for Jefferson County, OH and Brooke/Hancock County, WV combined.

Table 7

SOURCE TYPE POPULATION FOR YEAR 2005

sourceTyvePopulation

sourceTypeID sourceTypeName Jefferson BrookelHancock

Countv,OH County. WV

11 MotorCycle 6,072 1,673

21 Passenger Car 74,051 21,369

31 Passenger Truck 39,994 17,415

32 Light Commercial Truck 3,033 2,573

41 Intercity Bus 38 15

42 Transit Bus 68 8

43 School Bus 144 99

51 Refuse truck 23 12

52 Single Unit Short-haul Truck 958 739

53 Single Unit Long-haul Truck 299 84

54 Motor Home 1,953 63

61 Combination Short-haul Truc 283 130

62 Combination Long-haul Truc 326 145

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION

A grouping of data from Ohio and West Virginia sources along with the MOVES model defaults make

up the Vehicle Age Distribution. MOVES default values included Vehicle Type ID 41, 42, 51, 52, 53,

61, and 62. Local data from Ohio and West Virginia motor vehicle registrations accounted for all other

Vehicle Type !D. Table 8 and Table 9 show the Vehicle Age Distribution for Jefferson County, OH and

BrookelHancock County, WV respectively.

Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the u.s. EPA 1997Annual PM,.5 National AmbientAir Quality Standard

May 20l1; RevisedFebruary 2012 Page 12
Table 8

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY, OH

yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraclion yearid sourcelypeid ageid ageFraclion yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraclion

2005 11 0 0.0019 2005 21 9 0.0527 2005 31 18 0.0209

2005 11 1 0.0200 2005 21 10 0.0572 2005 31 19 0.0179

2005 11 2 0.0516 2005 21 11 0.0613 2005 31 20 0.0125

2005 11 3 0.0785 2005 21 12 0.0537 2005 31 21 0.0116

2005 11 4 0.0850 2005 21 13 0.0542 2005 31 22 0.0091

2005 11 5 0.0871 2005 21 14 0.0532 2005 31 23 0.0075

2005 11 6 0.0622 2005 21 15 0.0540 2005 31 24 0.0052

2005 11 7 0.0655 2005 21 16 0.0450 2005 31 25 0.0040

2005 11 8 0.0597 2005 21 17 0.0414 2005 31 26 0.0026

2005 11 9 0.0464 2005 21 18 0.0343 2005 31 27 0.0009

2005 11 10 0.0392 2005 21 19 0.0324 2005 31 28 0.0011

2005 11 11 0.0309 2005 21 20 0.0236 2005 31 29 0.0006

2005 11 12 0.0207 2005 21 21 0.0211 2005 31 30 0.0062

2005 11 13 0.0186 2005 21 22 0.0144 2005 32 0 0.0100

2005 11 14 0.0186 2005 21 23 0.0102 2005 32 1 0.0275

2005 11 15 0.0156 2005 21 24 0.0086 2005 32 2 0.0925

2005 11 16 0.0137 2005 21 25 0.0065 2005 32 3 0.0975

2005 11 17 0.0109 2005 21 26 0.0050 2005 32 4 0.0450

2005 11 18 0.0116 2005 21 27 0.0025 2005 32 5 0.0450

2005 11 19 0.0100 2005 21 28 0.0017 2005 32 6 0.0375

2005 11 20 0.0088 2005 21 29 0.0015 2005 32 7 0.0350

2005 11 21 0.0107 2005 21 30 0.0408 2005 32 8 0.0575

2005 11 22 0.0093 2005 31 0 0.0053 2005 32 9 0.0375

2005 11 23 0.0139 2005 31 1 0.0218 2005 32 10 0.0475

2005 11 24 0.0244 2005 31 2 0.0454 2005 32 11 0.0425

2005 11 25 0.0179 2005 31 3 0.0526 2005 32 12 0.0375

2005 11 26 0.0139 2005 31 4 0.0664 2005 32 13 0.0425

2005 11 27 0.0165 2005 31 5 0.0729 2005 32 14 0.0300

2005 11 28 0.0183 2005 31 6 0.0645 2005 32 15 0.0725

2005 11 29 0.0142 2005 31 7 0.0606 2005 32 16 0.0375

2005 11 30 0.1044 2005 31 8 0.0688 2005 32 17 0.0250

2005 21 0 0.0044 2005 31 9 0.0523 2005 32 18 0.0150

2005 21 1 0.0193 2005 31 10 0.0641 2005 32 19 0.0300

2005 21 2 0.0305 2005 31 11 0.0542 2005 32 20 0.0175

2005 21 3 0.0407 2005 31 12 0.0548 2005 32 21 0.0175

2005 21 4 0.0393 2005 31 13 0.0477 2005 32 22 0.0250

2005 21 5 0.0468 2005 31 14 0.0462 2005 32 23 0.0200

2005 21 6 0.0437 2005 31 15 0.0503 2005 32 24 0.0025

2005 21 7 0.0464 2005 31 16 0.0418 2005 32 25 0.0175

2005 21 8 0.0536 2005 31 17 0.0302 2005 32 26 0.0075

Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the u.s. EPA 1997 Annual PM,., National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 13
Table 8 (continued)

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY, OR

yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction

2005 32 27 0,0075 2005 42 5 0,1429 2005 43 14 0,0000

2005 32 28 0,0050 2005 42 6 0,1429 2005 43 15 0.0074

2005 32 29 0,0000 2005 42 7 0,0000 2005 43 16 0,0000

2005 32 30 0,0150 2005 42 8 0,0000 2005 43 17 0,0074

2005 41 0 0,0000 2005 42 9 0,0000 2005 43 18 0.0074

2005 41 1 0,0000 2005 42 10 0,0000 2005 43 19 0,0148

2005 41 2 0,0333 2005 42 11 0,0000 2005 43 20 0,0296

2005 41 3 0,1000 2005 42 12 0,0000 2005 43 21 0,0000

2005 41 4 0,0333 2005 42 13 0,0000 2005 43 22 0,0074

2005 41 5 0,0333 2005 42 14 0,0000 2005 43 23 0,0222

2005 41 6 0,1667 2005 42 15 0,0000 2005 43 24 0,0000

2005 41 7 0,0333 2005 42 16 0,0000 2005 43 25 0,0000

2005 41 8 0,0333 2005 42 17 0,0000 2005 43 26 0,0000

2005 41 9 0,0333 2005 42 18 0,0000 2005 43 27 0,0000

2005 41 10 0,1333 2005 42 19 0,1427 2005 43 28 0,0000

2005 41 11 0,1000 2005 42 20 0,0000 2005 43 29 0,0000

2005 41 12 0,0667 2005 42 21 0,0000 2005 43 30 0.0074

2005 41 13 0,0000 2005 42 22 0,0000 2005 51 0 0,0000

2005 41 14 0,1000 2005 42 23 0,0000 2005 51 1 0,0000

2005 41 15 0,0333 2005 42 24 0,0000 2005 51 2 0,0455

2005 41 16 0,0000 2005 42 25 0,0000 2005 51 3 0,0455

2005 41 17 0,0000 2005 42 26 0,0000 2005 51 4 0,2727

2005 41 18 0,0333 2005 42 27 0,0000 2005 51 5 0,0000

2005 41 19 0,0000 2005 42 28 0,0000 2005 51 6 0,0455

2005 41 20 0,0333 2005 42 29 0,0000 2005 51 7 0,0909

2005 41 21 0,0000 2005 42 30 0,0000 2005 51 8 0,1818

2005 41 22 0,0000 2005 43 0 0,0444 2005 51 9 0,0909

2005 41 23 0,0000 2005 43 1 0,1185 2005 51 10 0,0000

2005 41 24 0,0000 2005 43 2 0,0667 2005 51 11 0,0455

2005 41 25 0,0000 2005 43 3 0,0593 2005 51 12 0,0909

2005 41 26 0,0000 2005 43 4 0,0222 2005 51 13 0,0455

2005 41 27 0,0000 2005 43 5 0,0593 2005 51 14 0,0000

2005 41 28 0,0000 2005 43 6 0,0370 2005 51 15 0,0000

2005 41 29 0,0000 2005 43 7 0,0444 2005 51 16 0,0000

2005 41 30 0,0336 2005 43 8 0,0519 2005 51 17 0,0000

2005 42 0 0,0000 2005 43 9 0,0667 2005 51 18 0,0000

2005 42 1 0,1429 2005 43 10 0,0741 2005 51 19 0,0000

2005 42 2 0,2857 2005 43 11 0,0667 2005 51 20 0,0000

2005 42 3 0,0000 2005 43 12 0,0815 2005 51 21 0,0000

2005 42 4 0,1429 2005 43 13 0,1037 2005 51 22 0,0453

Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the u.s. EPA 1997 Annual PM,.s National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011; RevisedFebruary 2012 PageJ4
Table 8 (continued)

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY, OR

yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraclion yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraclion

2005 51 23 0,0000 2005 53 1 0,0000 2005 54 10 0,0287

2005 51 24 0,0000 2005 53 2 0,0455 2005 54 11 0,0417

2005 51 25 0,0000 2005 53 3 0,0455 2005 54 12 0,0355

2005 51 26 0,0000 2005 53 4 0,2727 2005 54 13 0,0307

2005 51 27 0,0000 2005 53 5 0,0000 2005 54 14 0,0294

2005 51 28 0,0000 2005 53 6 0,0455 2005 54 15 0,0219

2005 51 29 0,0000 2005 53 7 0,0909 2005 54 16 0,0301

2005 51 30 0,0000 2005 53 6 0,1618 2005 54 17 0,0225

2005 52 0 0,0000 2005 53 9 0,0909 2005 54 16 0,0219

2005 52 1 0,0000 2005 53 10 0,0000 2005 54 19 0,0176

2005 52 2 0,0455 2005 53 11 0,0455 2005 54 20 0,0273

2005 52 3 0,0455 2005 53 12 0,0909 2005 54 21 0,0225

2005 52 4 0,2727 2005 53 13 0,0455 2005 54 22 0,0355

2005 52 5 0,0000 2005 53 14 0,0000 2005 54 23 0,0314

2005 52 6 0,0455 2005 53 15 0,0000 2005 54 24 0,0225

2005 52 7 0,0909 2005 53 16 0,0000 2005 54 25 0,0191

2005 52 8 0,1818 2005 53 17 0,0000 2005 54 26 0,0362

2005 52 9 0,0909 2005 53 18 0,0000 2005 54 27 0,0150

2005 52 10 0,0000 2005 53 19 0,0000 2005 54 28 0,0130

2005 52 11 0,0455 2005 53 20 0,0000 2005 54 29 0.0109

2005 52 12 0,0909 2005 53 21 0,0000 2005 54 30 0.2309

2005 52 13 0,0455 2005 53 22 0,0453 2005 61 0 0,0023

2005 52 14 0,0000 2005 53 23 0,0000 2005 61 1 0,0102

2005 52 15 0,0000 2005 53 24 0,0000 2005 61 2 0,0228

2005 52 18 0,0000 2005 53 25 0,0000 2005 81 3 0,0255

2005 52 17 0,0000 2005 53 26 0,0000 2005 61 4 0,0383

2005 52 18 0,0000 2005 53 27 0.0000 2005 61 5 0,0409

2005 52 19 0,0000 2005 53 28 0,0000 2005 61 6 0,0427

2005 52 20 0,0000 2005 53 29 0,0000 2005 61 7 0,0412

2005 52 21 0,0000 2005 53 30 0,0000 2005 61 8 0,0401

2005 52 22 0,0453 2005 54 0 0,0034 2005 61 9 0,0418

2005 52 23 0.0000 2005 54 1 0,0096 2005 61 10 0,0557

2005 52 24 0,0000 2005 54 2 0,0239 2005 61 11 0,0529

2005 52 25 0,0000 2005 54 3 0.0280 2005 61 12 0,0454

2005 52 26 0,0000 2005 54 4 0.0335 2005 61 13 0,0488

2005 52 27 0.0000 2005 54 5 0,0260 2005 61 14 0,0379

2005 52 26 0.0000 2005 54 6 0,0485 2005 61 15 0,0458

2005 52 29 0,0000 2005 54 7 0.0362 2005 61 16 0.0527

2005 52 30 0,0000 2005 54 8 0.0225 2005 61 17 0,0396

2005 53 0 0,0000 2005 54 9 0.0239 2005 61 18 0.0353

Transportation Air Quaiity Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S. EPA /997 Annual PM,., National Ambient Air Quaiity Standard

May 20//; Revised February 20/2 Page /5
Table 8 (continued)

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY, OR

yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction

2005 61 19 0.0352 2005 62 3 0.0470 2005 62 18 0.0221

2005 61 20 0.0283 2005 62 4 0.0359 2005 62 19 0.0221

2005 61 21 0.0340 2005 62 5 0.0331 2005 62 20 0.0083

2005 61 22 0.0314 2005 62 6 0.0249 2005 62 21 0.0166

2005 61 23 0.0224 2005 62 7 0.0276 2005 62 22 0.0166

2005 61 24 0.0242 2005 62 8 0,0331 2005 62 23 0.0166

2005 61 25 0.0157 2005 62 9 0.0663 2005 62 24 0.0083

2005 61 26 0.0147 2005 62 10 0.0884 2005 62 25 0.0083

2005 61 27 0.0077 2005 62 11 0.1050 2005 62 26 0.0110

2005 61 28 0.0068 2005 62 12 0.1243 2005 62 27 0,0028

2005 61 29 0,0059 2005 62 13 0.0746 2005 62 28 0.0028

2005 61 30 0,0538 2005 62 14 0,0635 2005 62 29 0,0000

2005 62 0 0.0028 2005 62 15 0.0414 2005 62 30 0.Q109

2005 62 1 0.0028 2005 62 16 0,0442

2005 62 2 0,0028 2005 62 17 0,0359

Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S, EPA 1997Annual PM,s National AmbientAir Quality Standard

May 2011; RevisedFebruary 2012 Page 16
Table 9

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR BROOKEIHANCOCK COUNTY, WV

yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcelypeid ageid ageFraclion yearid sourcelypeid ageid ageFraclion

2005 11 ° 0,0291 2005 21 9 0,0639 2005 31 18 0,0136

2005 11 1 0,0472 2005 21 10 0,0654 2005 31 19 0,0112

2005 11 2 0,0678 2005 21 11 0,0596 2005 31 20 0,0101

2005 11 3 0,0872 2005 21 12 0,0515 2005 31 21 0,0103

2005 11 4 0,0993 2005 21 13 0,0437 2005 31 22 0,0087

2005 11 5 .. 0,0690 2005 21 14 0,0352 2005 31 23 0,0064

2005 11 6 0,0460 2005 21 15 0,0315 2005 31 24 0,0063

2005 11 7 0,0617 2005 21 16 0,0255 2005 31 25 0,0035

2005 11 8 0,0654 2005 21 17 0,0208 2005 31 26 0,0033

2005 11 9 0,0575 2005 21 18 0,0165 2005 31 27 0,0017

2005 11 10 0,0412 2005 21 19 0,0121 2005 31 28 0,0013

2005 11 11 0,0339 2005 21 20 0,0101 2005 31 29 0,0013

2005 11 12 0,0212 2005 21 21 0,0100 2005 31 30 0,0207

2005 11 13 0,0194 2005 21 22 0,0055 2005 32 ° 0,0346

2005 11 14 0,0224 2005 21 23 0,0044 2005 32 1 0,0287

2005 11 15 0,0163 2005 21 24 0,0037 2005 32 2 0,0606

2005 11 16 0,0121 2005 21 25 0,0039 2005 32 3 0,0740

2005 11 17 0,0121 2005 21 26 0,0034 2005 32 4 0,0807

2005 11 18 0,0139 2005 21 27 0,0010 2005 32 5 0,0843

2005 11 19 0,0042 2005 21 28 0,0011 2005 32 6 0,0909

2005 11 20 0,0073 2005 21 29 0,0009 2005 32 7 0,0701

2005 11 21 0,0079 2005 21 30 0,0401 2005 32 8 0,0524

2005 11 22 0,0163 2005 31 ° 0;0318 2005 32 9 0,0528

2005 11 23 0,0091 2005 31 1 0,0322 2005 32 10 0,0555

2005 11 24 0,0115 2005 31 2 0,0523 2005 32 11 0,0488

2005 11 25 0,0085 2005 31 3 0,0590 2005 32 12 0,0232

2005 11 26 0,0067 2005 31 4 0,0650 2005 32 13 0,0319

2005 11 27 0,0109 2005 31 5 0,0751 2005 32 14 0,0303

2005 11 28 0,0103 2005 31 6 0,0719 2005 32 15 0,0382

2005 11 29 0,0103 2005 31 7 0,0644 2005 32 16 0,0335

2005 11 30 0,0743 2005 31 8 0,0639 2005 32 17 0,0205

2005 21 ° 0,0247 2005 31 9 0,0576 2005 32 18 0,0083

2005 21 1 0,0387 2005 31 10 0,0620 2005 32 19 0,0114

2005 21 2 0,0534 2005 31 11 0,0545 2005 32 20 0,0134

2005 21 3 0,0668 2005 31 12 0,0494 2005 32 21 0,0110

2005 21 4 0,0592 2005 31 13 0,0437 2005 32 22 0,0130

2005 21 5 0,0619 2005 31 14 0,0366 2005 32 23 0,0091

2005 21 6 0,0563 2005 31 15 0,0334 2005 32 24 0,0079

2005 21 7 0,0639 2005 31 16 0,0308 2005 32 25 0,0020

2005 21 8 0,0653 2005 31 17 0,0180 2005 32 26 0,0039

Transportation Air Quality Anaiysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S EPA 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 20Il; Revised February 2012 Page 17
Table 9 (continued)

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR BROOKEIHANCOCK COUNTY, WV

yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction

2005 32 27 0.0024 2005 42 5 0.0576 2005 43 14 0.0464

2005 32 28 0.0031 2005 42 6 0.0504 2005 43 15 0.0374

2005 32 29 0.0028 2005 42 7 0.0461 2005 43 16 0.0144

2005 32 30 0.0007 2005 42 8 0.0492 2005 43 17 0.0111

2005 41 0 0.0843 2005 42 9 0.0759 2005 43 18 0.0136

2005 41 1 0.0672 2005 42 10 0.0609 2005 43 19 0.0138

2005 41 2 0.0576 2005 42 11 0.0506 2005 43 20 0.0118

2005 41 3 0.0506 2005 42 12 0.0489 2005 43 21 0.0104

2005 41 4 0.0693 2005 42 13 0.0434 2005 43 22 0.0107

2005 41 5 0.0562 2005 42 14 0.0394 2005 43 23 0.0073

2005 41 6 0.0488 2005 42 15 0.0320 2005 43 24 0.0092

2005 41 7 0.0379 2005 42 16 0.0321 2005 43 25 0.0000

2005 41 8 0.0453 2005 42 17 0.0181 2005 43 26 0.0000

2005 41 9 0.0535 2005 42 18 0.0082 2005 43 27 0.0000

2005 41 10 0.0560 2005 42 19 0.0231 2005 43 28 0.0000

2005 41 11 0.0550 2005 42 20 0.0071 2005 43 29 0.0000

2005 41 12 0.0597 2005 42 21 0.0032 2005 43 30 0.0000

2005 41 13 0.0528 2005 42 22 0.0007 2005 51 0 0.0498

2005 41 14 0.0487 2005 42 23 0.0013 2005 51 1 0.0398

2005 41 15 0.0400 2005 42 24 0.0009 2005 51 2 0.0340

2005 41 16 0.0167 2005 42 25 0.0006 2005 51 3 0.0767

2005 41 17 0.0147 2005 42 26 0.0002 2005 51 4 0.0926

2005 41 18 0.0133 2005 42 27 0.0004 2005 51 5 0.0604

2005 41 19 0.0180 2005 42 28 0.0003 2005 51 6 0.0544

2005 41 20 0.0112 2005 42 29 0.0001 2005 51 7 0.0243

2005 41 21 0.0090 2005 42 30 0.0002 2005 51 8 0.0696

2005 41 22 0.0099 2005 43 0 0.0794 2005 51 9 0.0625

2005 41 23 0.0038 2005 43 1 0.0660 2005 51 10 0.0514

2005 41 24 0.0048 2005 43 2 0.0647 2005 51 11 0.0730

2005 41 25 0.0048 2005 43 3 0.0594 2005 51 12 0.0610

2005 41 26 0.0040 2005 43 4 0.0798 2005 51 13 0.0796

2005 41 27 0.0036 2005 43 5 0.0406 2005 51 14 0.0442

2005 41 28 0.0026 2005 43 6 0.0511 2005 51 15 0.0479

2005 41 29 0.0007 2005 43 7 0.0435 2005 51 16 0.0145

2005 41 30 0.0000 2005 43 8 0.0585 2005 51 17 0.0169

2005 42 0 0.0624 2005 43 9 0.0696 2005 51 18 0.0156

2005 42 1 0.0771 2005 43 10 0.0419 2005 51 19 0.0040

2005 42 2 0.0742 2005 43 11 0.0526 2005 51 20 0.0043

2005 42 3 0.0727 2005 43 12 0.0556 2005 51 21 0.0043

2005 42 4 0.0627 2005 43 13 0.0512 2005 51 22 0.0000

Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the u.s. EPA 1997 Annual PMl ., National AmbientAir Quality Standard

May 2011; RevisedFebruary 2012 Page 18
Table 9 (continued)

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR BROOKEIHANCOCK COUNTY, WV

tyearid sourcelypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcelypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcelypeid ageid ageFraction

2005 51 23 0,0092 2005 53 1 0,1419 2005 54 10 0,0323

2005 51 24 0,0027 2005 53 2 0,1124 2005 54 11 0,0161

2005 51 25 0,0070 2005 53 3 0,0585 2005 54 12 0,0161

2005 51 26 0.0003 2005 53 4 0,0609 2005 54 13 0,0161

2005 51 27 0,0000 2005 53 5 0,1017 2005 54 14 0,0000

2005 51 28 0,0000 2005 53 6 0,0783 2005 54 15 0,0323

2005 51 29 0,0000 2005 53 7 0,0185 2005 54 16 0,0161

2005 51 30 0,0000 2005 53 8 0,0138 2005 54 17 0,0645

2005 52 ° 0,0622 2005 53 9 0,0686 2005 54 18 0,0161

2005 52 1 0,0520 2005 53 10 0,0748 2005 54 19 0.0161

2005 52 2 0,0412 2005 53 11 0,0517 2005 54 20 0,0484

2005 ' 52 3 0,0466 2005 53 12 0.0129 2005 54 21 0,0645

2005 52 4 0,0559 2005 53 13 0,0031 2005 54 22 0,0806

2005 52 5 0,0572 2005 53 14 0,0064 2005 54 23 0,0323

2005 52 6 0,0434 2005 53 15 0,0067 2005 54 24 0,0968

2005 52 7 0,0344 2005 53 16 0,0000 2005 54 25 0,0323

2005 52 8 0,0351 2005 53 17 0,0032 2005 54 26 0,0161

2005 52 9 0,0435 2005 53 18 0,0024 2005 54 27 0,0000

2005 52 10 0,0578 2005 53 19 0,0000 2005 54 28 0,0000

2005 52 11 0,0531 2005 53 20 0,0002 2005 54 29 0,0000

2005 52 12 0,0460 2005 53 21 0,0101 2005 54 30 0,1452

2005 52 13 0,0580 2005 53 22 0,0006 2005 61 ° 0,0843

2005 52 14 0,0430 2005 53 23 0,0011 2005 61 1 0,0672

2005 52 15 0,0251 2005 53 24 0,0005 2005 61 2 0,0576

2005 52 16 0.0409 2005 53 25 0,0000 2005 61 3 0,0506

2005 52 17 0,0220 2005 53 26 0,0020 2005 61 4 0,0693

2005 52 18 0,0219 2005 53 27 0,0000 2005 61 5 0,0562

2005 52 19 0,0239 2005 53 28 0,0000 2005 61 6 0,0488

2005 52 20 0,0190 2005 53 29 0,0000 2005 61 7 0,0379

2005 52 21 0,0225 2005 53 30 0,0000 2005 61 8 0,0453

2005 52 22 0,0088 2005 54 ° 0,0161 2005 61 9 0,0535

2005 52 23 0,0112 2005 54 1 0,0000 2005 61 10 0,0560

2005 52 24 0,0115 2005 54 2 0,0484 2005 61 11 0,0550

2005 52 25 0,0125 2005 54 3 0,0000 2005 61 12 0,0597

2005 52 26 0,0130 2005 54 4 0,0000 2005 61 13 0,0528

2005 52 27 0,0265 2005 54 5 0,0323 2005 61 14 0,0487

2005 52 28 0,0059 2005 54 6 0,0645 2005 61 15 0,0400

2005 52 29 0,0032 2005 54 7 0,0323 2005 61 16 0,0167

2005 52 30 0,0027 2005 54 8 0,0484 2005 61 17 0,0147

2005 53 ° 0,1697 2005 54 9 0,0161 2005 61 18 0,0133

Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the u.s. EPA 1997 Annual PM,., National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011; Revised February 2012 Page 19
Table 9 (continued)

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR BROOKEIHANCOCK COUNTY, WV

yearid sourcelypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcelypeid ageid ageFraction yearid sourcelypeid ageid ageFraction

2005 61 19 0.0180 2005 62 3 0.1140 2005 62 18 0.0035

2005 61 20 0.0112 2005 62 4 0.1186 2005 62 19 0.0012

2005 61 21 0.0090 2005 62 5 0.0804 2005 62 20 0.0010

2005 61 22 0.0099 2005 62 6 0.0643 2005 62 21 0.0006

2005 61 23 0.0038 2005 62 7 0.0403 2005 62 22 0.0010

2005 61 24 0.0048 2005 62 8 0.0304 2005 62 23 0.0000

2005 61 25 0.0048 2005 62 9 0.0315 2005 62 24 0.0009

2005 61 26 0.0040 2005 62 10 0.0320 2005 62 25 0.0003

2005 61 27 0.0036 2005 62 11 0.0290 2005 62 26 0.0003

2005 61 28 0.0026 2005 62 12 0.0080 2005 62 27 0.0000

2005 61 29 0.0006 2005 62 13 0.0087 2005 62 28 0.0000

2005 61 30 0.0001 2005 62 14 0.0115 2005 62 29 0.0000

2005 62 0 0.1668 2005 62 15 0.0062 2005 62 30 0.0000

2005 62 1 0.1331 2005 62 16 0.0013

2005 62 2 0.1140 2005 62 17 0.0011

Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the u.s. EPA 1997AnnualPM,., National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 201l; RevisedFebruary 2012 Page 20
ROAD TYPE DISTRIBUTION

The ODOT and WV Division ofHighway county summary Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMl) data

categorized by federal functional class for the three county non-attainment areas is the basis for Road

Type Distribution Fraction. Table 10 illustrates Road Type Distribution.

Table 10

ROAD TYPE DISTRIBUTION FOR BROOKE-HANCOCK-JEFFERSON

NON-ATTAINMENT AREA

source road roadDesc roadType source road roadDesc roadType

TypelD TypelD VMTFraction TvpelD TvpelD VMTFractlon

11 1Off·Network 0 43 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25

11 2Rural Restricted Access 0.11 43 5Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26

11 3Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38 51 1Off·Network 0

11 4Urban Restricted Access 0.25 51 2 Rural Restricted Access 0.11

11 5Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26 51 3 Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38

21 1Off·Network 0 51 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25

21 2Rural Restricted Access 0.11 51 5Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26

21 3Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38 52 1Off·Network 0

21 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25 52 2 Rural Restricted Access 0.11

21 5Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26 52 3Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38

31 1Off·Network 0 52 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25

31 2 Rural Restricted Access 0.11 52 5Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26

31 3Rural Unrestricted kcess 0.38 53 1Off·Network 0

31 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25 53 2 Rural Restricted Access 0.11

31 5Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26 53 3Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38

32 1Off·Network 0 53 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25

32 2Rural Restricted Access 0.11 53 5Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26

32 3Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38 54 1Off·Network 0

32 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25 54 2 Rural Restricted Access 0.11

32 5Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26 54 3 Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38

41 1Off·Network 0 54 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25

41 2Rural Restricted Access 0.11 54 5Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26

41 3Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38 61 1Off·Network 0

41 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25 61 2Rural Restricted kcess 0.11

41 5Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26 61 3Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38

42 1Off·Network 0 61 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25

42 2Rural Restricted Access 0.11 61 5Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26

42 3Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38 62 1 Off·Network 0

42 4Urban Restricted Access 0.25 62 2Rural Restricted Access 0.11

42 5Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26 62 3Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38

43 1Off·Network 0 62 4 Urban Restricted Access 0.25

43 2Rural Restricted Access 0.11 62 5Urban Unrestricted Access 0.26

43 3Rural Unrestricted Access 0.38

Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the u.s. EPA 1997 Annual PM, 5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 20II.. Revised February 2012 Page 21
POST PROCESSING

Several custom programs created by ODOT were computed the total emissions. The process uses data

on daily and directional traffic distributions as well as more up to date volume/delay functions from the

2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). This process, described below and illustrated in Figure 4, also

uses rewritten code able to handle the newer model network formats and MOVES generated emission

factors.

The first step in the process involves running postcms.exe to calculate hourly link volumes based on the

percentage ofthe daily volume (travel demand model output) determined by a link's facility and area

type. The analysis does not use the link speeds from the travel demand model. Using a link's volumeto-capacity ratio and link group code, a post-process to the model based on HeM methods estimates the

link speeds.

The second step (mmoves.exe) uses a combination ofthe MOVES emission factors and the hourly link

volumes that are output ofthe postcms.exe program. The hourly volumes multiplied by the MOVES

emission factor for the corresponding hour of day, speed bin, and road type; calculate emissions for

every network link for each hour. The final link on road vehicle emissions for the area is the sum of all

individual link-hour emissions.

The third step, (vehcalm.exe), calculates vehicle-based emissions for each source type for each hour of

the day. A combination oflocal and default data is the source for the vehicle source type. The final

vehicle emissions for each county are the sum of all individual hourly emissions for all vehicle types.

Since the intrazonal trips are not loaded onto the network, the fourth step in the process requires a

separate method to account for those trips that use local roads to travel within a zone. The intracalm.exe

program uses intrazonaJ trips to estimate VMT using the area in square miles and intrazonal trips of each

zone. The computer program assumes that the zone is circular and uses the radius ofthe circle as the

average trip length for these intrazonal trips. By combining MOVES generated emissions with

estimated intrazonal VMT, the intrazonal emissions are then calculated. The emission rates are the same

as those used to calculated link based emissions.

The final step is to summarize link, vehicle, and intrazonal emissions for each county, pollutant, and

analyzed year, and to multiply annual average daily emissions by 365 to produce an annual estimate.

Transportation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

For the U.S EPA 1997Annual PM2., NationalAmbientAir Quality Standard

May 2011; RevisedFebruary 2012 Page 22
APPENDIX A

INTERAGENCY CONSULTATION DOCUMENTATION
Jennifer Hunter [Jennifer.Hunter@epa.state.oh.us]

Friday, March OS, 2010 11 :37 AM

rsharma@belomar.org; mikepap@bhjmpc.org; Idaniel@clarkcountyohio.gov;

twalsh@clarkcountyohio.gov; jrdutton@co.starkoh.us; leigh.oesterling@dot.gov;

Dave.Moore1@dot.state.oh.us; jeffrey.blanton@fhwa.dot.gov; Larry.Heil@fhwa.dot.gov;

terri@fivco.org; LBrown@indot.in.gov; Jesse.Mayes@ky.gov; SMapel@lcounty.com;

cparasa@morpc.org; NGILL@morpc.org; fred.rader@movrc.org; randy.durst@movrc.org;

tracy.higgins@movrc.org; bdavis@mpo.noaca.org; aramirez@mvrpc.org;

ssalameh@ntelos.net; areser@oki.org; Perry.J.McCutcheon@wv.gov;

Richard.L.Warner@wv.gov

Carolina Prado; SRAYMOND@idem.IN.gov; SHAWN SEALS; john.gowins@ky.gov;

Craig.Butler@louisville.gov; Cynthia.Lee@louisvilleky.gov; William.F.Durham@wv.gov

Multi-State PM2.5 Redesignation Effort

Cc:

SUbject:

Mike Pap..ro..,c..k..i _

From:

Sent:

To:

Hello All:

OH, KY, IN and WV are working together to explore potential redesignation efforts for the 1997 annual PM2.5 standard

as we are all clean based on 2007-2009 air quality data, You are being contacted because you (or your organization)

have been involved historically with such efforts for redesignating OH, OH-IN-KY, OH-IN-WV and/or OH-WV

nonattainment areas.

Please review the folloWing map for those areas we are interested in obtaining your assistance with:

http://www.epa.ohio.gov/portalsJ27/SIP)Nonattainlpm2 S.pdf

Preliminary discussions have resulted in the following:

I-We would like to request USEPA redesignate each of these areas to attainment

2-We require assistance with mobile source modeling

3- The follOWing years will need mobile inventorles- 2005 base nonattainment year, 2008 attainment year, 2015 interim

(BUDGET) year and 2021 maintenance (BUDGET) year, 2021 is still under discussion but it is our belief 2020 will not

buy us enough time (it must be 10 years from USEPA's APPROVAL) and 2025 has proven to be too far out for

establishing other budgets (e,g., non-mobile). So we apologize for the odd year!

+There is significant discussion regarding whether Mobile 6.2 or MOVES is the appropriate, or best, model to use,

S-We are shooting for a by no later than end of "summer time" to submit. This would necessitate mobile runs be

complete by the June time frame so we have time to synthesize the data and prOVide an opportunity for public

comment.

In relation to #4 - each of you know better your capabilities given the time frame we are iooking at. Here are some of

the things we are hearing in questioning the appropriateness of using either model from our USEPA regions and also

some of the concerns we have raised as a group.

1. Since we already had these projects in the works R4 and RS (R3 silent thus far) thought we could defend the use of

MOBILE6.2 for SIPs prOVided we submit before the summer time frame of 2010 but the closer we get to December 2010

for a state submission, the harder it will be to defend EPA approval of a SIP that relies on anything other than MOVES.

2. RS also expressed the follOWing: please note that the MOVES model produces higher emission estimates than

MOBILE6.2 for both PM2.5 and NOx. So, at some point in time, within the 2 year MOVES grace period, the motor

vehicle emission budgets will need to be updated using MOVES. From preliminary estimates, it appears that MOBILE6.2

based motor vehicle budgets will be too tight for MPOs to conform the transportation plans after the 2 year grace

period. So, submitting the redesignation requests with MOBILE6.2 based motor vehicle budgets is consistent with our

gUidance. However, you will likely need to update the budgets in the redesignation requests using MOVES prior to the

end of the grace period (prior to the MPOs being reqUired to use MOVES for conformity purposes). The 2 year grace

period will end in 2012.

3. Concern was raised about duplicating work (i.e., as a result of 2 above)

4. There is concern there may not be detailed enough county level infonmation for the MOVES Inputs.

1
5. It was suggested that some areas could use MOVES and others Mobile 6.2. However, there is concern that If we

aren't consistent across the state then one or the other may be more scrutinized.

50 at this time for each of your organizations we'd appreciate the following information by March 16, 2009:

1-For the areas on the above map - which counties can you commit to modeling?

2-can you commit to the time frame of spring/early summer for modeling results?

3-Would you prefer to use MOVES or Mobile 6.2?

4-Even if you would prefer Mobile 6.2, are you able to use MOVES if necessary - within the time frame?

S-Will you have enough county level detail for the MOVES inputs?

6-Do you have any other comments/questions/concerns?

We thank you for your assistance,

JennIfer L Hunter

Environmental Manager

State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development

Ohio EPA, DivIsion of AIr Pollution Control

614-644-3696

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency This communication and any response to it may constitute a public record and

thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it.10 j

2
Oave.Moore1@dot.state.oh.us

Thursday, July 15, 20108:22 AM

Mike Paprocki

Nino.Brunello@dot.state.oh.us

RE: AQ Networks

Mike P8p;,;ro;,;c;,;,;k;.,i _

From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Mike,

Need networks forthe SIPredesignation analysis as follows:

• 2005 base non-attainment year

• 2008 attainment year

• 2015 interim (Budget) year

• 2021 maintenance (Budget) year

Thanks

OM

"Mike Paprocki" <mlkepap@bhlmpc.org>

07/15/201007:57 AM

To <Dave.Moore1@dot.st8te.oh.us>

cc <Nino;Brunello@dotstate.oh,us>

Subject RE: AQ Networks

I plan to start putting together a Memorandum outlining the process for the 2006 24-hour conformity exercise starting next week.

What is needed from me for the 1997 SIP Redesignation package other than what Nino has accomplished to date?

Michael Paprocki

Transportation Study Director

BHJ Metropolitan Planning Commission

124 North Fourth Street, Second Floor

Steubenville, OH 439S2

Phone: 740.282.3685

Fax: 740.282.1821

mailto:mikepap@bhjmpc.org

From: Oave.Moorel@dot.state.oh.us [maUto:Dave.Moorel@dot.state.o,h.usj

sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 12:40 PM

To: mikepap@bhjmpc.org

ec: Nino.Brunelio@dot.state.oh.us

Subject: AQ Networks

Mike,

Status of BHJ's networks for both 2006 PM2.• standard T-Plan conformity determination and 1997 PM2.• SIP

1
Jennifer Hunter [Jennifer.Hunter@epa.state.oh.us]

Tuesday, September 07,2010 12:38 PM

mikepap@bhjmpc.org; Nino.Brunello@dot.state.oh.us; Sam Granato

Leigh.Oesterllng@dot.gov; Dave Moore; Carolina Prado; jeffrey.blanton@fhwa.dot.gov;

Perry.J.McCutcheon@wv.gov; Richard.L.Warner@wv.gov; william.f.durham@wv.gov

Subject: Re: MUlti-State PM2.5 Redesignation Effort

Mike PaP..ro..c..ki..... _

From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

sam, Nino and Mike,

We are about to wrap up our Cincinnati area redesignation effort and move onto other areas. I've been told to have

them all done this year -> ouch. I'm touching base back with all the MPOs and DOTs to see where we are in MOVES

modeling and how quickly we could get redesignation modeling accomplished??? I know we talked about this a while

back regarding the Steub/Weirton area (Jefferson, Hancock and Brooke Counties).

As a reminder we were looking for the following MOVES modeling for S02, NOx and PM2.S

200S

2008

2015

2021

Thanks,Jen

ps....cc'd out of courtesy all the others to keep them In the loop.

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Unless otherwise provided by law

this communication and any response to it constitutes a public record. I°j

1
Mike Paprocki

From:

Sent:

To:

SUbject:

Carolina Prado [Carolina.Prado@epa.state.oh.usl Monday, December 06, 2010 9:44 AM

mikepap@bhjmpc.org; Leigh.Oesterling@dot.gov; Dave Moore;

Nino.Brunello@dot.state.oh.us; Sam Granato; Koch.Martin@epa.gov; Patricia Morris;

Jeffrey.Blanton@fhwa.dot.gov; fred.rader@movrc.org; randy.durst@movrc.org; tracy.higgins@movrc.org; Laura.M.Crowder@wv.gov; Perry.J.McCutcheon@wv.gov; RichardLWarner@wv.gov; Fred Durham

Steubenville-Weirton, Wheeling, and Parkersburg-Marietta areas PM2.5 redesignation effort

Interagency Consultancy Group,

We would like to start discussion on the PM2.5 redesignations for Steubenville-Weirton,

Wheeling, and Parkersburg-Marietta nonattainment areas. We would like to have an Interagency

Consultation Group call to agree on parameters and timing for all three redesignations. The

Steubenville-Weirton area includes the counties of Jefferson (OH) and Hancock and Brooke

(WV), the Wheeling area includes the counties of Belmont (OH) and Ohio and Marshall (WV), and

the Parkersburg-Marietta area includes the counties of Washington (OH) and Wood and Pleasants

(WV). For the purpose of redesignations and maintenance plans we have to include

emissions/projections for all these areas and counties.

As you all know we have to use MOVES to model our mobile emission for PM2.5, NOx, and 502,

and to fulfill our redesignation/maintenance plan, the following years will need mobile

inventories - 2005 base nonattainment year, 2008 attainment year, 2015 interim (BUDGET) year

and 2022 maintenance (BUDGET) year. During this call we would like to agree and be

consistent among what's modeled and the assumptions used, as well as to have a sense of

timing and other inputs needed.

Please let me know ASAP your availability on the following dates:

Friday, December 10th - anytime

Monday, December 13th - anytime

Tuesday, December 14th - after 12:00pm

Friday, December 17th - anytime

Also if I missed somebody on this email you think should be part of this lAC call, please

forward the email accordingly.

Thanks,

Carolina M. Prado

State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Ohio EPA, Division of Air Pollution Control 614-

644-2310 carolina.prado@epa.state.oh.us

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency

Unless otherwise provided by law,

this communication and any response to it constitutes a public record.

1
Mike Paprocki

From:

Sent

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Attachments:

Nino.Brunello@dot.state.oh.us

Tuesday, December 14, 2010 12:43 PM

leigh.Oesterling@dot.gov

ARamirez@mvrpc.org; Carolina.Prado@epa.state.oh.us; cparasa@morpc.org; Dave.Moore1

@dot.state.oh.us; William.F.Durham@wv.gov; fred.rader@movrc.org;

Jeffrey.Blanton@dot.gov; Jennifer.Hunter@epa.state.oh.us; Kotsch.Martin@epamail.epa.gov;

laura.M.Crowder@wv.gov; Idaniel@clarkcountyohio.gov; mikepap@bhjmpc.org;

Morris.Patricia@epa.gov; ngill@morpc.org; Perry.J.McCutcheon@WV.gov;

randy.durst@movrc.org; Richard.l.Warner@wv.gov; rothaj@rapca.org;

rsharma@belomar.org; Sam.Granato@dot.state.oh.us; SMapef@lcounty.com;

Smith.Dianna@epamall.epa.gov; tracy.higgins@movrc.org

RE: MOVES protocols - PM2.5 redesignation

ATT00110.jpg

I mistakenly typed the new data source in the wrong place in the parameter listing. Fuel Formulation is the one using the

MOVES default values. Fuel Supply in not using defaults.

-Nino

<Leigh.Oesterfing@dot.gov>

12114/2010 11:18 AM

To <NI9o,Brunello@dot.state,gfi.us>, <

<Id~n 10. cf kcotl t . >

<rothaI@tapc3~bm;i.;

<Dave.Moore1@dof.stae.oh.us>.

<Kotsch.MartJn@ecamail.epa.gov ,

<J~ffrfW;8Iimton@dotg0\f>; <fr.d-,,,.. ",i,,<r~ndy, ursl@mOVfc,otg>,

<flacy hlggfnst?!movrcsrs>.'~LaU~a~lVt;,~~~er@!11/l.I'99v~.

<perry,J.MCCutchaon@vN;gov>;;<BlcffaittLWarilet@wv:goV>,

<fdurham@wydep.org>,~~@?rcOunhi;COtn>.<cpara~a@mofOc.or9>1

<ng!lf@momc.om>,<4§..!ll.lifer,Hunter@gP.a,stale:oh;us;>

cc

Subject RE: MOVES protocols - PM2.5 redeslgnatlon

Just one question on fhe protocol- is Fuel Supply using MOVES Default value, as indicated on the alfached

protocol?

Thanks.

I.eigh

Leigh A. Oesterling, Planning & Environmental Team Leader

Federal Highway AdministratIon - Ohio Division

200 N. High Street. Room 328

Columbus. OH 43215

(614) 280-6837

leigh.oesterling@dot.gov

Please consider the environment before pnnting thif. emO$il

From: Nlt1O;Brunello@dot.state,oh,us [maitto:Nino.Bruneflo@dot.state.oh.us]

Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 9:00 AM

To: carolina Prado; Idanlel@ClarkcQuntyohio.gov; Oesterling, leigh (FHWA); Patricia Morris; aramirez@mvprc.org; Andy

1
Roth; rsharma@belomar.org; mikepap@bhjmpc.org; Dave Moore; Sam Granato; Kotsch.Martin@epamail.epa.gov;

Smith.Dianna@lepamali.epa.gov; Blanton, Jeffrey (FHWA); fred.rader@movrc.org; randy.durst@movrc.org;

tracy.higgins@movrc;,Q[g; Laura.M.Crowder@lwv.gov; PerryJ.McCutcheon@wv.gov; Richard.L.Warner@wv.gov; Fred

Durham; SMapel@lcounty.com; Chandra Parasa; ngill@morpc.org; Jennifer Hunter

Subject: MOVES protocols - PM2.5 redesignation

Ali.

My apologies for the delay. Attached is the updated MOVES inputs protocols for today's and tomorrow's PM2.5

redesignation conference calls.

Nino

Nino Brunello, P.E.

Modeling & Forecasting Section

Office of Multi-Modal Planning

Ohio Department of Transportation

(614) 752-5742[attachment "MOVES model protocals for standard MPOs.docx" deleted by Nino

Brunelio/MultiModalPlanning/CEN/ODOTj

2
Fine Particulate Matter (PMzJJ, AnnualStandard

Several parameters have been identified for use in the preparation ofthis analysis. The parameters listed

below will be applied in the base MOVES setup:

• Pollutants to be monitored: S02, NO" and PM2.,

• Model years: 2005,2008 (leap year), 2015, and 2022 (reflecting the most recent correspondence

from EPA)

• MOVES modeling technique: Emission Factor method

o Rates per Distance

o Rates per Vehicle

o (Rates per Profile are used only for VOCs)

• Scale: Custom domain

• Time Span:

o Time aggregation: Hour

o I month representing average annual temperatures

o All hours ofday selected

o 16 speed bins

o Weekdays only

• Geographic Bounds: Custom Domain - all counties in the MORPC area

• Vehicles/Equipment: All source types, gasoline and diesel

• Road Typa: All road types including off-network

• Pollutants and Processes: NO" All PM,.> categories, S02, Total Energy Consumption

• Strategies: none

• GeneralOutput: Units = grams, joules and miles

• Output Emissions: Time = hour, Location = custom area, on-road emission rates by road type

and source use type.

• Advanced Performance: none

The following assumptions will be applied within the County Data Manager portion ofthe MOVES

software package. Each parameter is identified, along with the source data that will be applied (if

applicable).

• Source Type Population: Combination of local and default data. Local data (20I0) ODOT from

motor vehicle registration data. Default data used for source types 41 , 61, and 62. Future year

growth rate based on MPO model variable Household growth rate

• Vehicle Type VMT: Combination oflocal and default data. HPMSVTypeYear VMT = daily

VMT from travel demand model with EPA's daily to annual VMT converter applied.

monthVMTFraction = default. dayVMTFraction=default. hourVMTFraction=local.

• 11M Programs: 11M program information will be applied for 2005 where applicable.

• Fuel Formulation: ModifY diesel sulfur fraction to match previous MOBILE inputs. Future runs

will also be modified for reformulated gas, RVP, etc. for summer analyses.

• Fuel Supply: Using MOVES default data.

• Meteorology Data: Local data obtained from NOAA National Climatic Data Center. Data will

consist of monthly high and low temperatures and daily relative humidity.

• Ramp Fraction: Using the base year travel demand model for VHT fractions. Future fractions

will be assumed constant.

• Road Type Distribution: Use ODOT (and some WVDOT) county summary VMT categorized

by federal functional classes
• Age Distribution: Combination oflocal and default data. Local data (2010) ODOT from motor

vehicle registration data (also some WVDO data). Default data used for source types 41, 51, 54,

61, and 62. The same age distribution will be used for all analysis years.

• Average Speed Distribution: Using MOVES default data. Data source does not matter because it

is ignored when calculating emissiou rates.

• Alternative Fuel Vehicle Types: Default file will be modified to reflect any CNG buses.
( : >,,) - / : if2 p. N! .

f\ " l'I)r:.~

[:) G- (. 'S

MVI 1< n+ ? C') I""2-

1(:',..,).. -~ - ..

'Rseu IV*Ti60

SW\·1(C f:,

v..,JIL(,.. .~ - _•.........
carolina Prado [Carolina.Prado@epa.state.oh.us] Wednesday, February 23, 2011 8:29 AM

rsharma@belomar.org; mikepap@bhjmpc.org; jeffrey.blanfon@dotgov; Leigh.Oesterling@dol.gov; Dave Moore; Mark Byram; Nino.Brunello@dol.state.oh.us; Sam

Granato; Martin Kotsck; Patricia Morris; Smith.Dianna@epamail.epa.gov; fred.rader@movrc.org; randy.durst@movrc.org; tracy.higgins@movrc.org; Laura MCrowder;

Perry.J.McCutcheon@wv.gov; Richard.L.Warner@wv.gov; Fred Durham

Jennifer Hunter

TODAY CALL: Steubenville-Weirton, Wheeling, and Parkersburg-Marietta areas PM2.5

redesignation

Cc:

SUbject:

Mike P2P;,;ro;,;c.k;;.i_ .... ........_""-........ _

From:

Sent:

To:

This is a friendly reminder of our call today.

February 23, 2011 (Wednesday) at 1:30 PM EST.

call in number is 614-644-4743, no access code required

Based our 12/14/2010 lAC call we agreed that Nino Brunello (ODOT) with BHJ was going to

produce network for 2015 &2022 and produce final protocol document for the Steubenville and

Sam Granato (ODOT) was going to tackle the Wheeling and Parkersburg areas in coordination

with the respective MPOs.

During the call it was agreed we would receive mobile numbers and protocols for all these

three areas (Steubenville-weirton, Wheeling, and Parkersburg-Marietta) by March 24, 2011.

During this call we would like to have an update on these efforts and know if we are still on

target for the 3/24 deadline.

Thanks,

Carolina

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency

Unless otherwise provided by law,

this communication and any response to it constitutes a pUblic record.

1
Carolina Prado (Carolina.Prado@epa.state.oh.us]

Tuesday, December 14, 2010 2:29 PM

rsharma@belomar.org; mlkepap@bhjmpc.org; jeffrey.blanton@dot.gov;

leigh.Oesterling@dot.gov; Dave Moore; Nino.Brunello@dot.state.oh.us; Sam Granato; Martin

Kotsck; Patricia Morris; Smith.Dianna@epamail.epa.gov; fred.rader@movrc.org;

randy.durst@movrc.org; tracy.higgins@movrc.org; laura M Crowder;

Perry.J.McCutcheon@wv.gov; Richard.l.Warner@wv.gov; Fred Durham

Jennifer Hunter

NEXT CALl: Steubenville-Weirton, Wheeling, and Parkersburg-Marietta areas PM2.5

redesignatlon

Cc:

SUbject:

Mike P'!p..ro.c.,k..i _

From:

Sent:

To:

Follow Up Flag:

Due By:

Flag Status:

Follow up

Tuesday, February 22,2011 9:00 AM

Flagged

Thanks for your participation in today's call.

We will have a follow-up calIon February 23, 2011 (Wednesday) at 1:30 PM EST.

The call in number is 614-644-4743, no access code required.

Thanks,

Carolina

__________ H __ • • __

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency

Unless otherwise provided by law,

this communication and any response to it constitutes a public record.

1
Appendix D-1

LADCO Technical Support

Document (Version IV, April

25, 2008, FINAL)

(available at

http://www.ladco.org/reports/generall)
Appendix 0-2

lADCO Technical Support

Document (Supplement,

Without CAIR Modeling,

September 12,2008, FINAL)

(available at

http://www.ladco.org/reports/general/)
Appendix 0-3

WVOEQ Nonroad Modeling
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JANUARY 2005 (WEIRTON 01-05)

Total for January, 2005

Date of Model Ruu: Nov 03 13:42:20: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIP8 Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 802

54009 Brooke County 5.05 15.44 80.54 0.72 0.87

54029 Hancock County 4.44 9.21 60.40 0.54 0.66

39081 Jefferson County 13.58 12.96 149.65 1.07 0.91

Totals: 23.06 37.61 290.59 2.32 2.44

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurual

CO2 VOC VOC

1,251.92 0.57 0.00

813.50 0.28 0.00

1,260.34 0.44 0.00

3,325.77 1.29 0.00

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JANUARY 2005 (WEIRTON 01-05)

Total for January, 2005

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 13:42:20: 2011

Tous/Muuth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS Connty Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.05 0.16 0.03 0.09 0.15 0.12 6.21

54029 Hancock County 0.05 0.20 0.03 0.10 0.22 0.16 5.48

39081 Jefferson County 0.14 0.67 0.14 0.59 0.32 0.34 16.21

Totals: 0.23 1.03 0.19 0.78 0.69 0.62 27.90

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

FEBRUARY 2005 (WEIRTON 02-05)

Total for February, 2005

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:53:00: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS County VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 5.04 15.43 80.65 0.72 0.87

54029 Hancock County 4.44 9.20 60.52 0.54 0.66

39081 Jefferson County 13.56 12.93 150m 1.07 0.91

Totals: 23.03 37.55 291.17 2.32 2.44

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c

TonslMonth

Today'. Date: 11/18/2011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,251.92 0.57 0.Q4

813.50 0.28 0.06

1,260.34 0.44 0.10

3,325.77 1.29 0.21

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

FEBRUARY 2005 (WEIRTON 02-05)

Total for February, 2005

Date ofModel Run: Nov 0313:53:00: 2011

TonslMonth

Todays Date: 11/1812011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS Counly Displaeement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.05 0.16 0.03 0.09 0.15 0.11 6.24

54029 Hancock County 0.05 0.20 0.03 0.10 0.22 0.16 5.53

39081 Jefferson County 0.14 0.67 0.14 0.59 0.31 0.34 16.28

Totals: 0.24 1.03 0.19 0.78 0.67 0.61 28.06

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

MARCH 2005 (WEIRTON 03-05)

Total for March" 2005

Date ofModel Run: Nov 0314:03:41: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11118/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacemeut VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.13 0.25 0.06 0.14 0.22 0.17 12.41

54029 Hancock County 0.17 0.31 0.08 0.18 0.33 0.24 14.81

39081 Jeffersou County 0.34 0.96 0.33 1.28 0.47 0.51 33.92

Totals: 0.64 1.51 0.47 1.60 1.02 0.92 61.14

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

MARCH 2005 (WEIRTON 03-05)

Total for March, 2005

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:03:41: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 10.48 16.91 116.66 0.88 0.98

54029 Hancock Conoty 12.69 11.11 110.91 0.75 0.78

39081 Jefferson Connty 28.49 19.23 260.79 1.88 1.41

Totals: 51.67 47.25 488.36 3.51 3.16

Core Model ver 2008a, 07106109. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 1111812011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,457.56 0.57 0.38

1,087.96 0.27 0.55

2.008.07 0.63 0.90

4,553.58 1.48 1.83

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

APRIL 2005 (WEIRTON 04-05)

Total for April, 2005

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:14:26: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 10.42 16.79 117.79 0.88 0.98

54029 Hancock County 12.62 10.97 112.22 0.75 0.78

39081 Jefferson County 28.29 18.97 264.52 1.88 1.41

Totals: 51.33 46.73 494.53 3.51 3.16

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 1111812011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,457.56 0.57 1.16

1,087.96 0.27 1.65

2,008.07 0.63 2.78

4,553.58 1.48 5.59

,.

9!

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

APRlL 2005 (WEIRTON 04-05)

Total for April, 2005

Date of Model Run: Nov 0314:14:26: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11118/~0l1

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS Connty Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.16 0.25 0.06 0.14 0.34 0.26 13.36

54029 Hancock County 0.20 0.31 0.08 0.18 0.50 0.37 16.18

39081 Jefferson County 0.43 0.96 0.33 1.28 0.72 0.77 36.19

Totals: 0.79 1.51 0.47 1.60 1.56 1.40 65.72

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reponing Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by Connty and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

MAY 2005 (WEIRTON 05-05)

Total for May, 2005

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 14:25:05: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIP8 Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 802

54009 Brooke County 10.38 16.70 118.70 0.88 0.98

54029 Hancock County 12.57 10.87 113.29 0.75 0.78

39081 Jefferson County 28.13 18.78 267.54 1.88 1.41

Totals: 51.07 46.35 499.53 3.51 3.16

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,457.56 0.57 0.62

1,087.96 0.27 0.89

2,008.07 0.63 1.48

4,553.58 1.48 2.99

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

MAY 2005 (WEIRTON 05-05)

Total for May, 2005

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 14:25:05: 2011

TonsIMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.10 0.25 0.06 0.14 0.50 0.39 13.00

54029 Hancock County 0.12 0.31 0.08 0.18 0.74 0.55 15.70

39081 Jefferson County 0.26 0.96 0.33 1.28 1.07 1.15 35.29

Totals: 0.48 1.51 0.47 1.60 2.31 2.08 63.99

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JUNE 2005 (WEIRTON 06-05)

Total for June, 2005

Date of Model Run: Nov 0314:36:14: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS County VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 20.70 19.09 168.34 1.19 1.18

54029 Hancock County 28.33 13.84 185.63 1.14 1.00

39081 Jefferson Couuty 61.68 27.45 515.08 3.29 2.06

Totals: 110.71 60.37 869.05 5.62 4.24

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility. Version 2005e

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 1111812011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,798.35 0.58 0.81

1,546.21 0.28 1.16

3,255.15 0.94 1.93

6,599.71 1,80 3.91

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JUNE 2005 (WEIRTON 06-05)

Total for June, 2005

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 14:36:14: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11118/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.21 0.33 0.10 0.19 0.67 0.52 24.10

54029 Hancock County 0.29 0.42 0.13 0.25 0.99 0.73 32.57

39081 Jefferson County 0.65 1.80 0.69 2.38 1.43 1.54 73.04

Totals: 1.15 2.54 0.92 2.82 3.09 2.78 129.71

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JULY 2005 (WEIRTON 07-05)

Total for July, 2005

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 14:47:36: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 20.68 19.04 168.82 1.19 1.18

54029 Hancock County 28.30 13.78 186.24 1.14 1.00

39081 Jefferson County 61.57 27.33 517.22 3.29 2.06

Totals: 110.55 60.15 872.28 5.62 4.24

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

,

1.798.35 0.58 0.94

1.546.21 0.28 1.34

3,255.15 0.94 2.23

6,599,71 1,80 4.50

'.

page 10f 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JULY 2005 (WEIRTON 07-05)

Total for July, 2005

Date ofModel Run: Nov 0314:47:36: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11118/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Penneation Penneation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.22 0.33 0.10 0.19 0.79 0.61 24.42

54029 Hancock County 0.30 0.42 0.13 0.25 1.16 0.86 33.04

39081 Jefferson County 0.69 1.80 0.69 2.38 1.68 1.81 73.80

Totals: 1.22 2.54 0.92 2.82 3.64 3.28 131.26

Core Model ver 20080, 07106/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

AUGUST 2005 (WEIRTON 08-05)

Total for August, 2005

Date of Model Ruu: Nov 03 14:58:51: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhanst Exhanst

FIPS Connty VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 20.68 19.05 168.69 1.19 1.18

54029 Hancock County 28.31 13.79 186.08 1.14 1.00

39081 Jefferson County 61.60 27.36 516.65 3.29 2.06

Totals: 110.59 60.21 871.42 5.62 4.24

,

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/1812011

Exhaust Crankcase Dinrnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,798.35 0.58 0.89

1,546.21 0.28 1.28

3,255.15 0.94 2.13

6,599.71 1.80 4.29

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollntant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

AUGUST 2005 (WEIRTON 08-05)

Total for August, 2005

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 14:58:51: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11118/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Penneation Penneation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.22 0.33 0.10 0.19 0.76 0.59 24.34

54029 Hancock County 0.30 0.42 0.13 0.25 1.12 0.83 32.91

39081 Jefferson County 0.68 1.80 0.69 2.38 1.63 1.75 73.59

Totals: 1.20 2.54 0.92 2.82 3.51 3.17 130.84

Core Model ver 20080, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reponing Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

SEPTEMBER 2005 (WEIRTON 09-05)

Total for September, 2005

Date ofModel Run: Nov 0315:10:09: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 10.38 16.85 119.40 0.90 1.01

54029 Hancock County 12.58 11.06 114.10 0.77 0.81

39081 Jefferson County 28.03 18.56 268.88 1.87 1.39

Totals: 50.99 46.47 502.37 3.53 3.20

Core Model ver 2008a, 07106109. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,476.12 0.57 0.68

1,109.45 0.27 0.97

1,996.25 0.63 1.60

4,581.82 1.48 3.25

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

SEPTEMBER 2005 (WEIRTON 09-05)

Total for September, 2005

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 15:10:09: 2011

TonsIMonth

Today's Date: 11118/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS Connty Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.10 0.25 0.06 0.14 0.58 0.45 13.21

54029 Hancock County 0.13 0.31 0.08 0.18 0.85 0.63 16.00

39081 Jefferson County 0.29 0.96 0.33 1.28 1.24 1.33 35.69

Totals: 0.52 1.51 0.47 1.60 2.67 2.41 64.89

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06109. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

OCTOBER 2005 (WEIRTON 10-05)

Total for October, 2005

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:20:58: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS County VOC No.. CO PM25 802

54009 Brooke County 10.44 16.95 118.37 0.90 1.01

54029 Hancock County 12.64 11.16 112.89 0.77 0.81

39081 Jefferson County 28.21 18.77 265.49 1.87 1.39

Totals: 51.28 46.88 496.75 3.53 3.20

Core Model veT 20080, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 1111812011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurual

CO2 VOC VOC

1,476.12 0.57 1.37

1,109.45 0.27 1.95

1,996.25 0.63 3.29

4,581.82 1.48 6.60

page I of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

OCTOBER 2005 (WEIRTON 10-05)

Total for October, 2005

Date ofMode] Run: Nov 03 ]5:20:58: 2011

TouslMonth

Today's Date: llll8/20II

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.17 0.25 0.06 0.14 0040 0.31 13.70

54029 Hancock County 0.21 0.31 0.08 0.18 0.59 0.44 16.66

39081 Jefferson County 0.45 0.96 0.33 1.28 0.85 0.92 36.92

Totals: 0.84 1.51 0.47 1.60 1.84 1.66 67.28

Core Model ver 2008a, 07106/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by Connty and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

NOVEMBER 2005 (WEIRTON 11-05)

Total for November, 2005

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:32:12: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

F1PS County VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 10.50 17.08 117.20 0.90 1.01

54029 Hancock County 12.71 11.30 111.53 0.77 0.81

39081 Jeffersou County 28.42 19.03 261.64 1.87 1.39

Totals: 51.62 47.41 490.38 3.53 3.20

Core Model ver 200Ba. 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

TouslMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,476.12 0.57 0.45

1,109.45 0.27 0.64

1,996.25 0.63 1.05

4,581.82 1.48 2.13

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

NOVEMBER 2005 (WEIRTON 11-05)

Total for November, 2005

Date ofModel Run: Nov 0315:32:12: 2011

TonsIMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.14 0.25 0.06 0.14 0.24 0.19 12.53

54029 Hancock County 0.17 0.31 0.08 0.18 0.36 0.27 14.98

39081 Jefferson County 0.36 0.96 0.33 1.28 0.52 0.56 34.10

Totals: 0.67 1.51 0.47 1.60 1.12 1.01 61.62

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

DECEMBER 2005 (WEIRTON 12-05)

Total for December, 2005

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:42:59: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 5.04 15.42 80.71 0.72 0.87

54029 Hancock County 4.43 9.19 60.58 0.54 0.66

39081 Jefferson County 13.55 12.92 150.20 1.07 0.91

Totals: 23.02 37.53 291.48 2.32 2.44

Core Model ver 20080, 07106109. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,251.92 0.57 0.03

813.50 0.28 0.05

1,260.34 0.44 0.08

3,325.77 1.29 0.16

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

DECEMBER 2005 (WEIRTON 12-05)

Total for December, 2005

Date ofMode1 Run: Nov 03 15:42:59: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11118/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Penneation Penneation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.05 0.16 0.03 0.09 0.17 0.13 6.27

54029 Hancock County 0.05 0.20 0.03 0.10 0.25 0.19 5.57

39081 Jefferson County 0.15 0.67 0.14 0.59 0.36 0.39 16.35

Totals: 0.25 1.03 0.19 0.78 0.78 0.70 28.20

Core Model ver 20080, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JANUARY 2008 (WEIRTON 01-08)

Total for January, 2008

Date of Model Run: Nov 0313:46:34: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 3.95 12.39 66.48 0.62 0.16

54029 Hancock County 3.60 7.70 51.23 0.47 0.11

39081 Jefferson County 12.32 11.18 131.58 0.98 0.16

Totals: 19.87 31.27 249.29 2.07 0.43

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/1812011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,302.27 0.37 0.00

853.00 0.18 0.00

1,337.19 0.30 0.00

3,492.46 0.85 0.00

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JANUARY 2008 (WEIRTON 01-08)

Total for January, 2008

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 13:46:34: 2011

TonsIMonth

Today's Date: II/I8/20II

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS Conoty Displaeement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.04 0.16 0.03 0.09 0.16 0.13 4.93

54029 Hancock County 0.05 0.20 0.03 0.11 0.23 0.19 4.59

39081 Jefferson County 0.14 0.68 0.16 0.67 0.35 0.38 14.99

Totals: 0.23 1.04 0.21 0.87 0.74 0.70 24.51

Core Model ver 20080, 07106/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2

1(;~~' .•
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

FEBRUARY 2008 (WEIRTON 02-08)

Total for February, 2008

Date of Model Run: Nov 0313:57:14: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 802

54009 Brooke County 3.95 12.38 66.57 0.62 0.16

54029 Hancock County 3.60 7.69 51.33 0.47 0.11

39081 Jefferson County 12.30 11.15 131.89 0.98 0.16

Totals: 19.85 31.22 249.78 2.07 0.43

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/1812011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,302.27 0.37 0.05

853.00 0.18 0.06

1,337.19 0.30 0.11

3,492.46 0.85 0.22

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

FEBRUARY 2008 (WEIRTON 02-08)

Total for February, 2008

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 13:57:14: 2011

Vapor

FIPS Connty Displacement

VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.05

54029 Hancock County 0.05

39081 Jefferson County 0.15

Totals: 0.24

TousIMonth

Today's Date: 11/1812011

Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

VOC VOC LossVOC Penneation Penneation VOC

VOC VOC

0.16 0.03 0.09 0.16 0.13 4.97

0.20 0.03 0.11 0.23 0.19 4.64

0.68 0.16 0.67 0.34 0.37 15.07

1

1.04 0.21 0.87 0.72 0.69 24.69

Core Model ver 2008a, 07106/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by Conoty and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

MARCH 2008 (WEIRTON 03-08)

Total for March, 2008

Date of Model Run: Nov 0314:08:00: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS Couuty VOC NOs CO /'PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 8.23 13.95 96.60 0.75 0.18

54029 Hancock County 10.15 9.75 93.64 0.64 0.14

39081 Jefferson County 25.99 16.98 228.58 1.74 0.25

Totals: 44.37 40.68 418.82 3.13 0.56

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/1812011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,514.99 0.36 0.40

1,135.80 0.17 0.57

2,139.07 0.42 0.98

-

4,789.86 0.96 1.95

,

page I of 2
Emission Totals by Connty and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

MARCH 2008 (WEIRTON 03-08)

Total for March, 2008

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 14:08:00: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS Conoty Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.13 0.24 0.06 0.15 0.23 0.20 10.00

54029 Hancock County 0.16 0.30 0.08 0.19 0.35 0.28 12.25

39081 Jefferson County 0.36 0.97 0.38 1.48 0.51 0.56 31.66

Totals: 0.65 1.51 0.53 1.82 1.09 1.04 53.92

Core Model ver 20080,07/06109. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

APRIL 2008 (WEIRTON 04-08)

Total for April, 2008

Date of Model Run: Nov 0314:18:40: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 8.18 13.83 97.50 0.75 0.18

54029 Hancock County 10.09 9.61 94.74 0.64 0.14

39081 Jefferson County 25.81 16.72 231.82 1.74 0.25

Totals: 44.08 40.16 424.05 3.13 0.56

Core Model ver 2008a, 07106109. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11118/2011

Exhaust Crankcase Dinrnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,514.99 0.36 1.19

1,135.80 0.17 1.71

2,139.07 0.42 3.04

4,789.86 6.96 5.94

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

APRIL 2008 (WEIRTON 04-08)

Total for April, 2008

Date ofModel Run: Nov 0314:18:40: 2011

TonsIMonth

Today's Date: 11118/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.15 0.24 0.06 0.15 0.36 0.30 11.01

54029 Hancock County 0.20 0.30 0.08 0.19 0.53 0.43 13.70

39081 Jefferson County 0.45 0.97 0.38 1.48 0.78 0.85 34.19

Totals: 0.80 1.51 0.53 1.82 1.67 1.59 58.89

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

MAY 2008 (WEIRTON 05-08)

Total for May, 2008

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 14:29:23: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 8.15 13.75 98.22 0.75 0.18

54029 Hancock County 10.Q4 9.51 95.63 0.64 0.14

39081 Jefferson County 25.67 16.52 234.44 1.74 0.25

Totals: 43.86 39.78 428.29 3.13 0.56

Core Model ver 20080, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reponing Utility, Version 2005c

TonslMonth

Today's Date: lI/I8/2011

Exhaust Crankcase Dinrnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,514.99 0.36 0.64

1,135.80 0.17 0.92

2,139.07 0.42 1.62

4,789.86 0.96 3.18

page 10f 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

MAY 2008 (WEIRTON 05-08)

Total for May, 2008

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 14:29:23: 2011

TonsIMonth

Today's Date: 11118/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Penneation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke Counly 0.09 0.24 0.06 0.15 0.53 0.45 10.68

54029 Hancock Counly 0.12 0.30 0.08 0.19 0.78 0.64 13.25

39081 Jefferson County 0.28 0.97 0.38 1.48 1.16 1.26 33.25

Totals: 0.49 1.51 0.53 1.82 2.47 2.35 57;17

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2oo5e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JUNE 2008 (WEIRTON 06-08)

Total for June, 2008

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:40:44: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS County VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 16.62 16.28 141.45 1.01 0.21

54029 Hancock County 22.99 12.73 158.87 0.97 0.18

39081 Jefferson County 56.09 24.85 454.68 3.05 0.37

Totals: 95.70 53.86 754.99 5.03 0.77

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 1111812011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,868.19 0.37 0.84

1,608.79 0.18 1.20

3,469.04 0.63 2.12

6,946.03 1.17 4.15

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JUNE 2008 (WEIRTON 06-08)

Total for June, 2008

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 14:40:44: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11118/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.20 0.33 0.10 0.20 0.71 0.60 19.96

54029 Hancock County 0.28 0.41 0.14 0.26 1.04 0.86 27.36

39081 Jefferson County 0.69 1.83 0.79 2.77 1.55 1.69 68.15

Totals: 1.17 2.57 1.03 3.23 3.31 3.15 115.48

Core Model ver 2008a. 07106/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JULY 2008 (WEIRTON 07-08)

Total for July, 2008

Date of Model Run: Nov 0715:26:54: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS County VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 16.60 16.23 141.84 1.01 0.21

54029 Hancock County 22.96 12.67 159.38 0.97 0.18

39081 Jefferson County 55.99 24.73 456.55 3.05 0.37

Totals: 95.55 53.63 757.77 5.03 0.77

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 1111812011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,868.19 0.37 0.96

1,608.79 0.18 1.38

3,469.04 0.63 2.44

6,946.03 1.17 4.79

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JULY 2008 (WEIRTON 07-08)

Total for July, 2008

Date ofModel Run: Nov 07 15:26:54: 2011

TonsIMonth

Today's Date: 11118/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Penneation Penneation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.21 0.33 0.10 0.20 0.84 0.71 20.32

54029 Hancock County 0.30 0.41 0.14 0.26 1.23 1.01 27.87

39081 Jefferson Connty 0.73 1.83 0.79 2.77 1.83 1.99 69.00

Totals: 1.24 2.57 1.03 3.23 3.90 3.71 117.19

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

AUGUST 2008 (WEIRTON 08-08)

Total for August, 2008

Date of Model Run: Nov 0315:03:22: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS County VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 16.61 16.24 141.74 1.01 0.21

54029 Hancock County 22.97 12.69 159.24 0.97 0.18

39081 Jefferson County 56.02 24.76 456.05 3.05 0.37

Totals: 95.59 53.69 757.03 5.03 0.77

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 1111812011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,868.19 0.37 0.92

1,608.79 0.18 1.32

3,469.04 0.63 2.33

6,946.03 1.17 4.56

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

AUGUST 2008 (WEIRTON 08-08)

Total for August, 2008

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 15:03:22: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS Connty Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Penueation Penueation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.21 0.33 0.10 0.20 0.81 0.68 20.22

54029 Hancock County 0.29 0.41 0.14 0.26 1.19 0.98 27.74

39081 Jefferson County 0.72 1.83 0.79 2.77 1.77 1.92 68.77

Totals: 1.22 2.57 1.03 3.23 3.76 3.58 116.73

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reponing Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

SEPTEMBER 2008 (WEIRTON 09-08)

Total for September, 2008

Date of Model Run: Nov 0315:14:32: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 8.15 13.89 98.79 0.77 0.18

54029 Hancock County 10.05 9.67 96.30 0.66 0.14

39081 Jefferson County 25.59 16.32 235.60 1.73 0.25

Totals: 43.79 39.88 430.69 3.16 0.57

Core Model ver 20080, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,534.91 0.36 0.70

1,158.87 0.17 1.00

2,126.38 0.42 1.76

4,820.16 0.96 3.45

page Iof 2
Emission Totals by Connty and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

SEPTEMBER 2008 (WEIRTON 09-08)

Total for September, 2008

Date ofModel Run: Nov 0315:14:32: 2011

TonsIMonth

Today's Date: 11/1812011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.10 0.24 0.06 0.15 0.61 0.52 10.90

54029 Hancock County 0.13 0.30 0.08 0.19 0.90 0.74 13.57

39081 Jefferson County 0.30 0.97 0.38 1.48 1.34 1.46 33.70

Totals: 0.53 1.51 0.53 1.82 2.86 2.72 58.16

Core Model ver 20080, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

OCTOBER 2008 (WEIRTON 10-08)

Total for October, 2008

Date of Model Run: Nov 0315:25:22: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS County VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 8.19 13.98 97.97 0.77 0.18

54029 Hancock County 10.10 9.78 95.30 0.66 0.14

39081 Jefferson County 25.74 16.53 232.66 1.73 0.25

Totals: 44.04 40.29 425.93 3.16 0.57

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility. Version 2005c

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,534.91 0.36 1.41

1,158.87 0.17 2.02

2,126.38 0.42 3.60

-

4,820.16 0.96 7.02

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

OCTOBER 2008 (WEIRTON 10-08)

Total for October, 2008

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 15:25:22: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Penneation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.16 0.24 0.06 0.15 0.42 0.36 11.36

54029 Hancock County 0.21 0.30 0.08 0.19 0.62 0.51 14.21

39081 Jefferson County 0.48 0.97 0.38 1.48 0.92 1.00 35.01

Totals: 0.85 1.51 0.53 1.82 1.97 1.88 60.57

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

NOVEMBER 2008 (WEIRTON 11-08)

Total for November, 2008

Date of Model Run: Nov 0315:36:34: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 8.24 14.10 97.04 0.77 0.18

54029 Hancock County 10.16 9.92 94.17 0.66 0.14

39081 Jefferson County 25.93 16.79 229.33 1.73 0.25

Totals: 44.33 40.81 420.54 3.16 0.57

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,534.91 0.36 0,46

1,158.87 0.17 0.66

2.126.38 0,42 1.14

4,820.16 0.96 2.27

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

NOVEMBER 2008 (WEIRTON 11-08)

Total for November, 2008

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 15:36:34: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS Connty Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.13 0.24 0.06 0.15 0.26 0.22 10.13

54029 Hancock Connty 0.17 0.30 0.08 0.19 0.38 0.31 12.43

39081 Jefferson County 0.38 0.97 0.38 1.48 0.56 0.61 31.88

Totals: 0.69 1.51 0.53 1.82 1.20 1.14 54.44

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

DECEMBER 2008 (WEIRTON 12-08)

Total for December, 2008

Date of Model Run: Nov 0715:29:03: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 3.94 12.37 66.61 0.62 0.16

54029 Hancock County 3.60 7.68 51.38 0.47 0.11

39081 Jefferson County 12.29 11.14 132.05 0.98 0.16

Totals: 19.83 31.19 250.04 2.07 0.43

Core Model ver 2008a, 07106109. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c

TouslMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,302.27 0.37 0.03

853.00 0.18 0.05

1,337.19 0.30 0.09

3,492.46 0.85 0.17

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

DECEMBER 2008 (WEIRTON 12-08)

Total for December, 2008

Date ofModel Run: Nov 0715:29:03: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11118/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS Connty Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Penneation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.05 0.16 0.03 0.09 0.18 0.15 5.00

54029 Hancock County 0.05 0.20 0.03 0.11 0.26 0.22 4.69

39081 Jefferson County 0.15 0.68 0.16 0.67 0.39 0.43 15.15

Totals: 0.25 1.04 0.21 0.87 0.83 0.79 24.85

Core Model ver 20080, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JANUARY 2015 (WEIRTON 01-15)

Total for January, 2015

Date of Model Ruu: Nov 03 13:48:41: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11118/2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Crankcase Diurual

FIPS Couuty VOC NOs CO PM25 802 CO2 VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 2.22 5.75 35.24 0.43 0.02 1,453.33 0.05 0.00

54029 Hancock County 2.37 4.07 34.75 0.33 0.01 962.47 0.03 0.00

39081 Jefferson County 9.56 6.56 108.39 0.78 0.02 1,534.97 0.08 0.00

Totals: 14.16 16.38 178.38 1.54 0.05 3,950.76 0.16 0.00

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JANUARY 2015 (WEIRTON 01-15)

Total for January, 2015

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 13:48:41: 2011

TonslMouth

Today's Date: 11/1812011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.04 0.18 0.03 0.03 0.11 0.07 2.73

54029 Hancock County 0.05 0.22 0.03 0.04 0.17 0.10 3.02

39081 Jefferson Connty 0.16 0.76 0.19 0.54 0.20 0.15 11.63

Totals: 0.25 1.16 0.25 0.62 0.48 0.32 17.39

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

FEBRUARY 2015 (WEIRTON 02-15)

Total for February, 2015

Date of Model Run: Nov 0313:59:22: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS County VOC NOs CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 2.22 5.74 35.31 0.43 0.02

54029 Hancock County 2.37 4.06 34.83 0.33 0.01

39081 Jefferson County 9.55 6.54 108.67 0.78 0.02

Totals: 14.14 16.35 178.80 1.54 0.05

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06109. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/1812011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,453.33 0.05 0.04

962.47 0.03 0.06

1,534.97 0.08 0.11

3,950.76 0.16 0.20

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by Connty and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

FEBRUARY 2015 (WEIRTON 02-15)

Total for February, 2015

Date ofModel Run: Nov 0313:59:22: 20ll

TonsIMonth

Today's Date: IIIIS/20ll

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.04 0.18 0.03 0.03 0.11 0.Q7 2.77

54029 Hancock County 0.05 0.22 0.03 0.04 0.16 0.10 3.07

39081 Jefferson County 0.17 0.76 0.19 0.54 0.20 0.14 11.73

Totals: 0.26 1.16 0.25 0.62 0.47 0.31 17.57

Core Model ver 2008a, 07106/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

MARCH 2015 (WEIRTON 03-15)

Total for March, 2015

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:10:08: 20ll

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS County VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 4.08 7.15 57.27 0.52 0.02

54029 Hancock County 5.27 5.98 66.07 0.44 0.02

39081 Jefferson County 17.87 10.56 185.79 1.32 0.03

Totals: 27.22 23.69 309.12 2.28 0.07

Core Model ver 20080, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

TonslMonth

Today's Date: IV18/20ll

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,687.48 0.04 0.34

1,271.30 0.Q2 0.49

2,464.54 0.08 0.97

5,423.31 0.14 1.80

page 10f 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

MARCH 2015 (WEIRTON 03-15)

Total for March, 2015

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 14:10:08: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS Connty Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Penneation Penneation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.12 0.26 0.07 0.06 0.17 0.10 5.24

54029 Hancock County 0.16 0.33 0.09 0.08 0.25 0.15 6.85

39081 Jefferson Connty 0.40 1.09 0.47 1.35 0.30 0.22 22.73

Totals: 0.68 1.68 0.62 1.49 0.71 0.47 34.82

Core Model ver 20080,07106/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

APRIL 2015 (WEIRTON 04-15)

Total for April, 2015

Date of Model Run: Nov 0314:20:47: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 4.05 7.08 57.93 0.52 0.02

54029 Haucock County 5.24 5.87 66.91 OM 0.02

39081 Jefferson County 17.75 10.38 188.54 1.32 0.03

Totals: 27.05 23.33 313.38 2.28 0.07

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,687.48 0.04 1.03

1,271.30 0.G2 1.48

2,464.54 0.08 3.01

5,423.31 0.14 5.52

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

APRIL 2015 (WEIRTON 04-15)

Total for April, 2015

Date ofModel Run: Nov 0314:20:47: 2011

TonsIMonth

Today's Date: 1111812011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Rnnning Tank Hose Total

FIPS Connty Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.15 0.26 0.Q7 0.06 0.25 0.15 6.07

54029 Hancock County 0.20 0.33 0.09 0.08 0.38 0.23 8.05

39081 Jefferson County 0.50 1.09 0.47 1.35 0.46 0.33 25.03

Totals: 0.85 1.68 0.62 1.49 1.09 0.72 39.15

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

MAY 2015 (WEIRTON 0~-15)

Total for May, 2015

Date of Model Run: Nov 0314:31:38: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS County VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 4.03 7.02 58.47 0.52 0.02

54029 Hancock County 5.21 5.80 67.60 0.44 0.02

39081 Jefferson County 17.66 10.24 190.77 1.32 0.03

Totals: 26.91 23.06 316.84 2.28 0.07

Core Model ver 20080, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/1812011

Exhaust Crankcase Dinrnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,687.48 0.04 0.55

1,271.30 0.02 0.80

2,464.54 0.08 1.60

-

5,423.31 0.14 2.95

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

MAY 2015 (WEIRTON 05-15)

Total for May, 2015

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 14:31:38: 2011

TonslMonth

Today'. Date: 11118/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS Connty Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.09 0.26 0.Q7 0.06 0.37 0.23 5.71

54029 Hancock County 0.12 0.33 0.09 0.08 0.56 0.35 7.56

39081 Jefferson County 0.31 1.09 0.47 1.35 0.68 0.49 23.72

Totals: 0.52 1.68 0.62 1.49 1.61 1.07 36.99

Core Model ver 20080, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reponing Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JUNE 2015 (WEIRTON 06-15)

Total for June, 2015

Date ofModel Ruu: Nov 0314:43:00: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS County VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 8.37 9.41 92.67 0.68 0.03

54029 Hancock County 11.80 8.95 117.80 0.63 0.03

39081 Jefferson County 37.32 16.68 377.42 2.30 0.05

Totals: 57.49 35.04 587.90 3.61 0.11

Core Model ver 20080, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Exhaust Crankcase Diunlal

CO2 VOC VOC

2,073.94 0.04 0.72

1,784.67 0.02 1.04

3,992.38 0.12 2.09

7,850.99 0.19 3.85

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JUNE 2015 (WEIRTON 06-15)

Total for June, 2015

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 14:43:00: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.20 0.36 0.11 0.08 0.50 ·0.31 10.69

54029 Hancock Couoty 0.28 0.45 0.15 0.11 0.75 0.47 15.07

39081 Jefferson County 0.76 2.05 0.95 2.62 0.91 0.66 47.49

Totals: 1.24 2.86 1.21 2.81 2.16 1.43 73.25

Core Model ver 20080, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JULY 2015 (WEIRTON 07-15)

Total for July, 2015

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:54:17: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 8.36 9.37 92.97 0.68 0.03

54029 Hancock County 11.79 8.90 118.20 0.63 0.03

39081 Jefferson County 37.26 16.59 379.01 2.30 0.05

Totals: 57.41 34.87 590.18 3.61 0.11

Core Model ver 2008a, 07106109. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

2,073.94 0.04 0.83

1,784.67 0.02 1.20

3,992.38 0.12 2.41

7,850.99 0.19 4.44

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JULY 2015 (WEIRTON 07-15)

Total for July, 2015

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 14:54:17: 20ll

TouslMouth

Today's Date: 11118/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Penneation Penneation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.21 0.36 0.11 0.08 0.59 0.36 10.94

54029 Hancock County 0.30 0.45 0.15 0.11 0.89 0.55 15.45

39081 Jefferson County 0.81 2.05 0.95 2.62 1.07 0.77 48.07

Totals: 1.32 2.86 1.21 2.81 2.54 1.68 74.46

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06109. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

AUGUST 2015 (WEIRTON 08-15)

Total for August, 2015

Date of Model Run: Nov 0315:05:36: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke Couoty 8.36 9.38 92.89 0.68 0.03

54029 Haocock Couoty 11.79 8.92 118.09 0.63 0.03

39081 Jeffersoo Couoty 37.28 16.61 378.59 2.30 0.05

Totals: 57.43 34.91 589.57 3.61 0.11

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting UtIlity, Version 2005c

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 1111812011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

2,073.94 0.04 0.79

1,784.67 0.D2 1.14

3,992.38 0.12 2.30

7,850.99 0.19 4.24

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

AUGUST 2015 (WEIRTON 08-15)

Total for August, 2015

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 15:05:36: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

-

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS Conoty Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.21 0.36 0.11 0.08 0.57 0.35 10.87

54029 Hancock County 0.29 0.45 0.15 0.11 0.86 0.53 15.34

39081 Jefferson County 0.79 2.05 0.95 2.62 1.03 0.75 47.90

Totals: 1.30 2.86 1.21 2.81 2.46 1.62 74.11

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

SEPTEMBER 2015 (WEIRTON 09-15)

Total for September, 2015

Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:16:40: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 4.04 7.11 58.89 0.53 0.02

54029 Hancock County 5.22 5.90 68.12 0.45 0.Q2

39081 Jefferson County 17.61 10.11 191.78 1.32 0.Q3

Totals: 26.87 23.12 318.78 2.30 0.07

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11118/2011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,710.61 0.04 0.60

1,298.09 0.Q2 0.87

2,449.81 0.08 1.74

5,458.51 0.14 3.20

page lof 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

SEPTEMBER 2015 (WEIRTON 09-15)

Total for September, 2015

Date ofModel Run: Nov 0315:16:40: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/1812011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS Connty Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.10 0.26 0.07 0.06 0.43 0.26 5.87

54029 Hancock County 0.13 0.33 0.09 0.08 0.65 0.40 7.79

39081 Jefferson County 0.34 1.09 0.46 1.35 0.78 0.57 24.01

Totals: 0.57 1.68 0.62 1.49 1.87 1.23 37.67

..

Core Model ver 20080, 07/06109. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

OCTOBER 2015 (WEIRTON 10-15)

Total for October, 2015

Date of Model Run: Nov 0315:27:38: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS County VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 4.06 7.17 58.28 0.53 0.02

54029 Hancock County 5.25 5.98 67.34 0.45 0.02

39081 Jefferson County 17.71 10.25 189.27 1.32 0.03

Totals: 27.02 23.41 314.89 2.30 0.07

Core Model ver 2008a, 07106109. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

.-

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11118/2011

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,710.61 0.04 1.21

1,298.09 0.02 1.75

2,449.81 0.08 3.56

-

5,458.51 0.14 6.52

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

OCTOBER 2015 (WEIRTON 10-15)

Total for October, 2015

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 15:27:38: 2011

TouslMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Penueation . Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke Couoty 0.16 0.26 0.Q7 0.06 0.30· 0.18 6.35

54029 Hancock Couoty 0.21 0.33 0.09 0.08 0.45 0.28 8.45

39081 Jeffersoo Couoty 0.53 1.09 0.46 1.35 0.54 0.39 25.71

Totals: 0.90 1.68 0.62 1.49 1.29 0.85 40.51

Core Model ver 2008a. 07/06109. NONROAD Reporting Utility. Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

NOVEMBER 2015 (WEIRTON 11-15)

Total for November, 2015

Date of Model Run: Nov 0315:38:41: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 4.09 7.25 57.59 0.53 0.02

54029 Hancock County 5.28 6.08 66.47 0.45 0.02

39081 Jefferson County 17.83 10.43 186.43 1.32 0.03

Totals: 27.20 23.77 310.49 2.30 om

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

TonslMonth (j;

Today's Date: 11/1812011

Exhaust Craukcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,710.61 0.04 0.40

1,298.09 0.02 0.57

2,449.81 0.08 1.13

-

5,458.51 0.14 2.10

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

NOVEMBER 2015 (WEIRTON 11-15)

Total for November, 2015

Date ofModel Run: Nov 03 15:38:41: 2011

Tous/Month

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.13 0.26 0.07 0.06 0.18 0.11 5.34

54029 Hancock County 0.17 0.33 0.09 0.08 0.27 0.17 6.99

39081 Jefferson County 0.42 1.09 0.46 1.35 0.33 0.24 22.92

Totals: 0.73 1.68 0.62 1.49 0.78 0.52 35.25

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06109. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

DECEMBER 2015 (WEIRTON 12-15)

Total for December, 2015

Date of Model Run: Nov 0315:49:31: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/1812011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

FIPS County VOC NOx CO PM25 802 CO2 VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 2.22 5.74 35.34 0.43 0.02 1,453.33 0.05 ' 0.03

54029 Hancock County 2.37 4.06 34.87 0.33 0.01 962.47 0.03 0.Q4

39081 Jefferson County 9.54 6.53 108.82 0.78 0.02 1,534.97 0.08 0.08

Totals: 14.13 16.33 179.02 1.54 0.05 3,950.76 0.16 0.16

Core Model ver 20080, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

DECEMBER 2015 (WEIRTON 12-15)

Total for December, 2015

Date ofModel Run: Nov 0315:49:31: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 11/18/2011

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.04 0.18 0.03 0.03 0.13 0.08 2.78

54029 Hancock County 0.05 0.22 0.03 0.04 0.19 0.12 3.10

39081 Jefferson County 0.17 0.76 0.19 0.54 0.23 0.17 11.76

Totals: 0.26 1.16 0.25 0.62 0.55 0.36 17.64

Core Model ver 20080, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JANUARY 2025 (WEIRTON 01-25)

Total for January, 2025

Date of Mode1 Run: Nov 2814:16:27: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS County VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 1.99 3.68 32.23 0.26 0.02

54029 Hancock County 2.20 2.54 35.23 0.19 om

39081 Jefferson County 8.32 4.57 117.50 0.55 0.02

Totals: 12.50 10.78 184.96 1.00 0.05

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 2/22/2012

Exhanst Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,724.31 om 0.00

1,143.55 0.02 0.00

1,825.77 0.04 0.00

--

4,693.64 0-07 0.00

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JANUARY 2025 (WEIRTON 01-25)

Total for January, 2025

Date ofModel Run: Nov 2814:16:27: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 212212012

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.04 0.21 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.04 2.40

54029 Hancock County 0.05 0.26 0.04 0.04 0.08 0.06 2.73

39081 Jefferson County 0.18 0.89 0.20 0.55 0.08 0.05 10.31

Totals: 0.27 1.35 0.27 0.62 0.20 0.14 15.44

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 oj 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

FEBRUARY 2025 (WEIRTON 02-25)

Total for February, 2025

Date of Model Run: Nov 2814:18:39: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 1.99 3.67 32.30 0.26 0.02

54029 Hancock County 2.20 2.53 35.32 0.19 om

39081 Jefferson County 8.30 4.55 117.82 0.55 0.02

Totals: 12.49 10.75 185.43 1.00 0.05

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 2/22/2012

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,724.31 om 0.03

1,143.55 0.02 0.05

1,825.77 0.04 0.11

4,693.64 0.07 0.19

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

FEBRUARY 2025 (WEIRTON 02-25)

Total for February, 2025

Date ofModel Run: Nov 2814:18:39: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 2/22/2012

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.04 0.21 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.04 2.43

54029 Hancock County 0.05 0.26 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.05 2.77

39081 Jefferson County 0.19 0.89 0.20 0.55 0.08 0.05 10.41

Totals: 0.28 1.35 0.27 0.62 0.20 0.14 15.61

Core Model ver 20080, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

MARCH 2025 (WEIRTON 03-25)

Total for March, 2025

Date of Model Run: Nov 2814:20:55: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 2/22/2012

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.13 0.31 0.07 0.04 0.08 0.05 3.47

54029 Hancock Couuly 0.18 0.39 0.10 0.05 0.11 0.08 4.37

39081 Jefferson County 0.44 1.25 0.51 1.37 0.11 0.08 16.92

Totals: 0.74 1.95 0.68 1.47 0.30 0.21 24.76

Core Model ver 20080, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

MARCH 2025 (WEIRTON 03-25)

Total for March, 2025

Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:20:55: 2011

TonsIMontlt

Today's Date: 2/22/2012

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS County VOC NOx CO PM25 S02 CO2

54009 Brooke County 2.50 4.75 53.67 0.30 0.02 1,991.17

54029 Hancock County 3.05 4.08 65.50 0.25 0.02 1,492.74

39081 Jefferson County 12.18 7.25 195.92 0.86 0.03 2,907.12

Totals: 17.74 16.08 315.10 1.41 0.08 6,391.03

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

Crankcase

VOC

0.00

0.00

om

0.02

Diurnal

VOC

':~' "0.28 ~' . ...~' .

0.40

0.97

1.65

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

APRIL 2025 (WEIRTON 04-25)

Total for April, 2025

Date of Model Run: Nov 2814:23:10: 20ll

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 2/22/2012

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIP8 Couuty VOC NOs CO PM25 802 CO2

54009 Brooke County 2.48 4.70 54.36 0.30 0.02 1,991.17

54029 Hancock County 3.03 4.00 66.39 0.25 0.02 1,492.74

39081 Jefferson County 12.07 7.09 198.93 0.86 0.03 2,907.12

Totals: 17.58 15.79 319.69 1.41 0.08 6,391.03

Crankcase "'

VOC

0.00

0.00

0.01

0.02

Di~rnal

VOC

0.85

1.21

3.01

5.07

Core Model ver 20080, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

APRJL 2025 (WEIRTON 04-25)

Total for April, 2025

Date ofModel Run: Nov 2814:23:10: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 2/22/2012

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.16 0.31 0.07 0.04 0.11 0.08 4.12

54029 Hancock County 0.21 0.39 0.10 0.05 0.17 0.13 5.29

39081 Jefferson County 0.55 1.25 0.51 1.37 0.17 0.12 19.07

Totals: 0.92 1.95 0.68 1.47 0.46 0.33 28.47

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

MAY 2025 (WEIRTON 05-25)

Total for May, 2025

Date of Model Run: Nov 2814:25:27: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 2.47 4.66 54.92 0.30 0.02

54029 Hancock Connty 3.00 3.95 67.11 0.25 0.D2

39081 Jefferson County 11.99 6.96 201.37 0.86 0.03

Totals: 17.46 15.58 323.40 1.41 0.08

Core Model ver 2008a, 07106109. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 2/2212012

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

1,991.17 0.00 0.46

1,492.74 0.00 0.65

2,907.12 0.01 1.60

6,391.03 0.02 2.71

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

MAY 2025 (WEIRTON 05-25)

Total for May, 2025

Date ofModel Run: Nov 28 14:25:27: 2011

TonsIMonth

Today's Date: 2/22/2012

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke Conoty 0.09 0.31 0.07 0.04 0.17 0.12 3.74

54029 Hancock Conoty 0.13 0.39 0.10 0.05 0.26 0.19 4.77

39081 Jefferson County 0.34 1.25 0.51 1.37 0.26 0.17 17.50

Totals: 0.57 1.95 0.68 1.47 0.69 0.49 26.01

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility. Version 2005e page 2 of:2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JUNE 2025 (WEIRTON 06-25)

Total for June, 2025

Date of Mode1 Run: Nov 2814:27:42: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS County VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 4.42 6.61 87.54 0.39 0.03

54029 Hancock Connty 5.90 6.59 114.67 0.34 0.03

39081 Jefferson County 23.82 11.75 397.00 1.49 0.06

Totals: 34.14 24.95 599.21 2.23 0.12

Core Model ver 2008a, 07106109. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 2/22/2012

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

2,428.50 • .0.00 0.60

2,069.02 0.00 0.85

4,670.23 om 2.09

9,167.74 0.02 3,54

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JUNE 2025 (WEIRTON 06-25)

Total for June, 2025

Date ofModel Run: Nov 2814:27:42: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 2/22/2012

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS CODDty Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.21 0.42 0.12 0.05 0.23 0.16 6.?1

54029 Hancock County 0.30 0.53 0.17 0.07 0.34 0.25 8.42

39081 Jefferson County 0.83 2.35 1.04 2.66 0.35 0.23 33,39

Totals: 1.34 3.29 1.33 2.78 0.92 0.65 48.02

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JULY 2025 (WEIRTON 07-25)

Total for July, 2025

Date of Model Run: Nov 2814:30:01: 2011

Emaust Emaust Emaust Emaust E:shaust

FIPS County VOC NOs CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 4.41 6.59 87.84 0.39 0.Q3

54029 Hancock County 5.89 6.55 115.07 0.34 0.03

39081 Jefferson County 23.76 11.67 398.72 1.49 0.06

Totals: 34.06 24.81 601.63 2.23 0.12

Core Model ver 20080, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 212212012

Emaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

2,428.50 0.00 0,69

2,069.02 0.00 0,98

4,670.23 om 2,41

9,167.74 0.02 4,08

page Iof 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

JULY 2025 (WEIRTON 07-25)

Total for July, 2025

Date ofModel Ruu: Nov 2814:30:01: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 2/22/2012

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC ,

54009 Brooke County 0,22 0042 0,12 0,05 0.27 0,19 6,38

54029 Hancock County 0.32 0,53 0,17 0.07 0040 0.30 8.66

39081 Jefferson County 0.89 2.35 1.04 2.66 0041 0.28 33.81

Totals: lA2 3.29 1.33 2.78 1.08 0.76 48.84

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

AUGUST 2025 (WEIRTON 08-25)

Total for August, 2025

Date ofModel Run: Nov 28 14:32: 18: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 4.41 6.60 87.76 0.39 0.Q3

54029 Hancock County 5.89 6.56 114.96 0.34 0.03

39081 Jefferson County 23.78 11.69 398.27 1.49 0.06

Totals: 34.08 24.85 600.99 2.23 0.12

Core Model ver 20080, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

t

TonslMQuth

'"

Today's Date: 2/22/2012

Exhaust Craukcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC VOC

2,428.50 0.00 0.66

2,069.02 0.00 0,93

4,670.23 0.01 2,30

9,167.74 0.02 3.89

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by Connty and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

AUGUST 2025 (WEIRTON 08-25)

Total for August, 2025

Date ofModel Run: Nov 2814:32:18: 2011

TonsIMonth

Today's Date: 2/22/2012

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose ToU\!

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC .,

54009 Brooke County 0.22 0.42 0.12 0.05 0.26 0.19 6.33

54029 Hancock County 0.31 0.53 0.17 0.Q7 0.39 0.29 8.59

39081 Jefferson County 0.87 2.35 1.04 2.66 0.39 0.27 33.67

Totals: 1.40 3.29 1.33 2.78 1.04 0.74 48$9

Core Model ver 20080, 07106109. NONROAD Reponing Utility, Version 2005c page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

SEPTEMBER 2025 (WEIRTON 09-25)

Total for September, 2025

Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:34:34: 2011

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 2/22/2{)12

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.10 0.31 om 0.04 0.20 0.14 3,84

54029 Hancock County 0.14 0.39 0.10 0.05 0.30 0.22 4,91

39081 Jefferson County 0.37 1.25 0.51 1.37 0.30 0.20 17·69

Totals: 0.62 1.95 0.68 1.47 0.79 0.56 26,44

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

SEPTEMBER 2025 (WEIRTON 09-25)

Total for September, 2025

Date ofModel Run: Nov 2814:34:34: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 2.47 4.70 55.31 0.31 0.02

54029 Hancock County 3.01 3.99 67.60 0.25 0.02

39081 Jeffersou County . 11.94 6.87 202.51 0.85 0.03

Totals: 17.42 15.56 325.41 1.41 0.08

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c

TonslMl>nth

Today's Date: 2/22/~012

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC voC

2,018.87 0.00 0.50

1,524.81 0.00 0.71

2,889.48 0.01 1.73

-

6,433.16 0.02 2,93

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

OCTOBER 2025 (WEIRTON 10-25)

Total for October, 2025

Date of Model Run: Nov 2814:36:49: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS County VOC NOs CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 2.49 4.74 54.68 0.31 0.02

54029 Hancock County 3.03 4.05 66.78 0.25 0.02

39081 Jefferson Couuty 12.03 7.00 199.77 0.85 0.Q3

Totals: 17.56 15.79 321.23 1.41 0.08

Core Model ver 2008a, 07106109. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005c

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 2/22/;2012

Exhaust Crankcase Diurlll\l

CO2 VOC vdC

2,018.87 0.00 ~m

1,524.81 0.00 1.43

2,889.48 om 3,56

6,433.16 O.oz 1i,00

page 1 of~
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

OCTOBER 2025 (WEIRTON 10-25)

Total for October, 2025

Date ofModel Run: Nov 28 14:36:49: 2011

TonsIM()ofh' .'

Today's Date: 2/22/2012

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS Connty Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.17 0.31 0.Q7 0.04 0.14 0.10 4.32

54029 Hancock County 0.23 0.39 0.10 0.05 0.20 0.15 5.59

39081 Jefferson County 0.59 1.25 0.51 1.37 0.21 0.14 19.67

Totals: 0.98 1.95 0.68 1.47 0.55 0.39 29,58

Core Model ver 20080, 07106109. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

NOVEMBER 2025 (WEIRTON 11-25)

Total for November, 2025

Date ofModel Run: Nov 2814:39:01: 201I

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS Couuty VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 2.51 4.79 53.97 0.31 0.02

54029 Hancock County 3.06 4.12 65.87 0.25 0.02

39081 Jefferson Connty 12.14 7.17 196.66 0.85 0.03

Totals: 17.72 16.09 316.50 1.41 0.08

Core Model ver 20080, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 2/22/2012

Exhaust Crankcase Diumal

CO2 VOC VOC

2,018.87 0.00 0.33

1,524.81 0.00 0.47

2,889.48 0.01 1.13

6,433.16 0.02 1.92

page 10j2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

NOVEMBER 2025 (WEIRTON 11-25)

Total for November, 2025

Date ofModel Run: Nov 2814:39:01: 2011

TonsIMonth

Today's Date: 2/22/2012

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS Conoty Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.13 0.31 0.Q7 0.04 0.08 0.06 3.54

54029 Hancock County 0.19 0.39 0.10 0.05 0.12 0.09 4,47

39081 Jefferson County 0.47 1.25 0.51 1.37 0.13 0.08 17.09

Totals: 0.79 1.95 0.68 1.47 0.33 0.23 25.10

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

DECEMBER 2025 (WEIRTON 12-25)

Total for December, 2025

Date of Model Run: Nov 2814:41:10: 2011

Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust Exhaust

FIPS County VOC NOx CO PM25 S02

54009 Brooke County 1.99 3.67 32.34 0.26 0.02

54029 Hancock County 2.19 2.53 35.36 0.19 0.01

39081 Jefferson County 8.30 4.54 117.98 0.55 0.02

Totals: 12.48 10.74 185.68 1.00 0.05

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e

TonslMonth

Today's Date: 2/22/2012

Exhaust Crankcase Diurnal

CO2 VOC vOt

1,724.31 0.01 0,02

1,143.55 0.02 0,04

1,825.77 0.04 0.08

4,693.64 0,07 0,14

page 1 of 2
Emission Totals by County and Pollutant

All Fuels

WEIRTON

DECEMBER 2025 (WEIRTON 12-25)

Total for December, 2025

Date ofModel Run: Nov 2814:41:10: 2011

TonsIMonth

Today's Date: 2/22/2012

Vapor Spillage Hot Soak Running Tank Hose Total

FIPS County Displacement VOC VOC LossVOC Permeation Permeation VOC

VOC VOC VOC

54009 Brooke County 0.04 0.21 0,03 0.03 0.06 0,04 2.43

54029 Hancock County 0.05 0.26 0.04 0.04 0.09 0.06 2,78

39081 Jefferson County 0.19 0.89 0.20 0.55 0.09 0.06 10.41

Totals: 0.29 1.35 0.27 0.62 11.23 0.16 15,62

Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD Reporting Utility, Version 2005e page 2 of 2
WEIRTON, WEST VIRGINIA Period ofRecord General Climate Summary - Temperature

WEIRTON, WEST·VIRGINIA

Period ofRecord General Climate Summary - Temperature

Page I of I

I From Year-1949 To Year=1976 1

1 Station:(469345) WEIRTON I

1 Averages Daily Extremes I

Monthly I Daily Extremes II Monthly Extremes Averages

" i'::. "Min. Temp·1

BEJB~GBGHighestBLowestB~~~~ Max. Mm. Mean High Date Low Date Mean Year Mean Year 90 F 32 F 32 F 0 F

1 January 1138.71122.111

0000~8~DDDD~~~~ 30.41[J][ 25/19501[J§]1 24/196311 41.91OQJI 23.11021mml 25.41[J]

1February 1141.711 23.411 32.5ICE1I 29/19761Cilll 22/196311 40.9[2§]1 24.4I[§]mQI 22.9[]]

1 March 1151.011 30.211 40.61rnl 30/1976[]]! 11/196011 49.81~1 29.5ID:21m[J]02]m

1 April II 64.411 40.311 52.410]1 18/19761wl 01/196411 58.110i11 45.710TImmrum

1 May II 74.211 49.31[}!]rnl 18/196210111 10/196611 67.91~1 55.8102J[Q]mCQ]m

I June 1\ 82.011 58.411 70.210211 26/19521~1 011196611 73.61D3l1 65.8lrnQmmm

1 July 1185.01162.311 73.611 10011 14119541GI 09/196311 78.0[]]1 70.7IOQJ[J]mmm

I August 1\84.01161.411 72.711 10011 30/19531~1 29/196511 76.310211 69.51[§][TI]mmm

ISeptemberI178.01154.911 66.411 10011 01/195310111 24/197411 70.910TI1 62.6102J0]mmm

1 October II 67.61\44.311 55.91~1 03/195110TI1 21/195211 61.21[§]1 50.91D3l[Q]m~m

tNovemberIl52.71135.011 43.81~1 03/1961!CQlI 30/1958/1 49.21~r.::.JDJOIlm[J]@]m

IDecemberI141.21126.011 33.61~1 10/1971101 16/195111 41.11~1 24.3I[§]mrnl 23.3[Q]

1 Annual 1163.41142.311 52.81110011 195308301[J§]11963012411 54.81~1 50.81~116.71124.311115.2[~

1 Winter 1140.511 23.811 32.21[J]1 195001251[J§]1 1963012411 36.31~1 25.3I[§]mI21.71[J1]Q]

1 Spring II 63.211 39.910TIlrnl 196205181[]1 1960031111 54.91~1~[B][Q][J]1 27.61m

ISummer 1183.61160.711 72.21110011 195308301~1 1966060111 73.81D3l1 70.0Irnl13.9Immm

1 Fall 1166.11144.711 55.411 10011 19530901lCQII 1958113011 58.110TI1 52.0102J0][J]116.0Im

Table updated on Oct 28,

For monthly and annual means, thresholds, and sums:

Months with 5 or more missing days are not considered

Years with 1 or more missing months are not considered

Seasons are climatological not calendar seasons

Winter = Dec., Jan., and Feb. Spring = Mar., Apr., and May

Summer = Jun., Jul., and Aug. Fall = Sep., Oct., and Nov.

Southeast Regional Climate Center, SliRCCstqff

http://www.sercc.comlcgi-binisercc/cliGCStT.pl?wv9345 11312011
Appendix E-1

Steubenville-Weirton Missing

Data Imputation
Steubenville-Weirton PM2.5 Nonattainment Area

Monitor Missing Data Analysis

The current Steubenville-Weirton nonattainment area is located in the eastern side of Ohio

and includes the following counties: Jefferson in Ohio and Hancock and Brooke in West

Virginia.

The area has five monitors measuring PM2.5 concentrations, which are operated by the

Ohio EPA Division of Air Pollution Control, Southwest District Office (Jefferson County

monitors) and by the West Virginia Department of Air Quality. A listing of the design values

based on the three-year average of the annual mean concentrations from 2008 through

2010 is shown in Table 1. The design values calculated for the Steubenville-Weirton area

shows that the annual PM25 NMQS has been attained.

Table 1 - Monitoring Data for the Steubenville-Weirton area for 2008 - 2010

Annual Standard

Site County Year Al<erage

2008 2009 2010 2008-2010

39-081-0017 [a] Jefferson, OH 14.3 12.1 12.7 13.0

39-081-1001 14.1 11.2 12.7 12.7

54-009-0005 Brooke, WV 14.7 12.2 14.1 13.7

54-009-0011 13.8 11.9 13.5 13.1

54-029-1004 Hancock, WV 13.3 11.2 12.6 12.4

Less than 75% capture in at least one quarter

[a] This site has a 73% capture, resutting in one day of mssed data. Based on the data

from previous years, this site show s a decreasing trend in monitor readings. Ohio

believes that had the mssing data been collected it would not have resulted in a

design value that would exceed the standard.

Source: U.S. EPA Air Quahty System (AQS); http://www.epa.gov/ttn/alrs/alrsags/lndex.htm

However, based on Section 107(d)(3)(E)(i) of the Clean Air Act (CM) the PM2.5 monitoring

has to show that the three-year average of the annual mean values, based on data from all

monitoring sites in the area or its affected downwind environs, are below 15.0/m3

.

Moreover, in accordance with the CM Amendments, three complete years of monitoring

data are reqUired to demonstrate attainment at a monitoring site. In addition, U.S. EPA

regUlations require at least 75% data capture in each quarter of a consecutive 3-year period

in order for a design value to be valid.

Table 1 shows that the monitor site in Jefferson County (site 39-081-0017) did not comply

with the 75% data capture requirement in 2008. Specifically, the fourth quarter (October,

November, and December) of 2008 has only 73% capture. This monitoring site experienced

an instrument malfunction during the low percentage capture period with a total of 8 missing

1-in-3 day PM2.5 FRM runs.

1
In order to comply with U.S.EPA's 75% capture requirements, Ohio EPA prepared a

statistical analysis using multiple imputations. Imputing missing values for site 39-081-0017

and then doing an ordinary analysis as if the imputed values were real measurements (this

approach is usually better than excluding subjects with incomplete data). Most methods for

accounting for having incomplete data can be complex; the bootstrapping method however,

is an easy method to implement even though the computations can be slow. To use the

bootstrap, to correctly estimate variances of regression coefficients, one must repeat the

imputation process and the model fitting perhaps 1000 times using a resampling procedure.

Multiple imputations use random draws from the conditional distribution of the target

variable given the other variables. When a regression model is used for imputation, the

process involves adding a random residual to the "best guess" for missing values, to yield

the same conditional variance as the original variable. To properly account for variability

due to unknown values, the imputation will be repeated 1000 times.

Imputing missing data for Steubenville-Weirton PM2.5 nonattainment area

For simplification purposes we will refer to the sites in the Steubenville-Weirton

nonattainment area by the letter denoted in the second column of the table below.

1. Steubenville-Weirton Annual PM2.5 Design Value History

Table 2 - Historic Design Values for the Steubenville-Weirton area from 1999 to 2010

Annual DesiQn Value

Site Site County 1999- 2000- 2001- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- 2006- 2007- 2008-

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

39-081-0017 A

Jefferson, OH 15.8 15.4 15.5 14.8 14.2 13.0

39-081-1001 B 18.2 17.8 17.8 16.9 17.2 16.3 16.1 14.8 13.6 12.7

54-009-0005 C 17.3 16.8 16.8 16.5 16.8 16.4 16.3 15.4 14.4 13.7

D Brooke, WV

54-009-0011 16.6 16.1 16.2 15.8 16.4 15.7 16.1 14.9 14.0 13.0

54-029-1004 E Hancock, WV 17.3 17.5 17.4 17.0 16.6 15.4 15.2 14.3 13.4 12.4

incomplete data (quarter with <75% capture)

violating DV

From Table 2, all five sites have design values (DV) that meet the PM2.5 annual standard

since the 2006-2008 period. However, site A has not achieved clean data in 2008 and

therefore the entire nonattainment area is not eligible for redesignation absent this analysis.

As mentioned before, the lack of clean data in 2008 is due to the low percentage of data

capture in one or more quarters of 2008.

Multiple imputations and bootstrapping methods will help to generate values for the missing

data to determine 2008 completeness and recalculate the 2008-2010 DV.

2. Correlation, Quarterly Data Capture, and Data Site Pairing

Linear regression analyzes the relationship between two variables, X and Y. For each

subject, there is a known X and Y and we want to find the best straight line through the

data. The goal of linear regression is to find the line that best predicts Y from X. Linear

2
regression does this by finding the line that minimizes the sum of the squares of the vertical

distances of the points from the line. To determine which site combination (A and B, A and

C, A and D or A and E) has the best data (best fit) from which to impute missing data for

site A we determine the correlation between sites A and B, between A and C, between A

and D and between A and E.

The correlation value (R2

) is useful because it describes the degree of relationship between

two variables1 (variables or site concentrations in all sites). R2 is only a descriptive statistics.

Roughly speaking, we associate a high value of R2 with a good fit of the regression line and

associate a low value of R2 with a poor fit.

The mean of the quarterly data captured (the mean of the percentage captured) will allow

verifying the central tendency of each site, which will help to determine what site (B, C, D or

E) has a more data completeness to impute for site A.

Finally, although not as statistically significant as the correlation, or as the mean of the

percentage captured, pairing the site data seeks to reduce variability in order to make more

precise comparisons with fewer observations. Pairing the data will help to determine which

site, B, C, D or E, have more data when paired with A.

Below are the results for site A vs. the rest of the sites.

Table 3 - Correlation Matrix for site A against all other sites.

A

1 An R2 value of 0.0 means that knowing X does not help to predict Y, there is no linear relationship

between X and Y. When R2 equals 1.0, all points lie exactly on a straight line with no scatter; knOWing X

predicts Y perfectly.

3
Table 4 - Quarterly Data Capture

Monitoring Sites

A B C D E

2003Q1 49% 97% 100% 97%

2003 Q2 100% 100% 100% 93%

2003Q3 99% 100% 100% 97%

2003 Q4 85% 92% 93% 97% 80%

2004Q1 97% 93% 100% 100% 100%

2004 Q2 87% 100% 100% 97% 93%

2004Q3 84% 94% 97% 100% 77%

2004Q4 73% 93% 97% 100% 97%

2005Q1 93% 93% 87% 100% 100%

2005 Q2 61% 100% 97% 97% 97%

2005Q3 53% 100% 100% 100% 97% Table 5- Paired Data Site

0 2005 Q4 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ...

0 29· Quarter look 2006Q1 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% m (2003 Q4· 2010 Q4) 0

0 2006Q2 77% 80% 100% 100% 90% pairs pairs pairs pairs N Site Site Total l!! 2006 Q3 100% 93% 100% 100% 94% Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

2006Q4 100% 100% 100% 100% 90% A B 102 84 83 101 370 ..

u

.. 2007 Q1 97% 100% 100% 100% 97% A C 198 175 180 200 753 ..

Q 2007Q2 87% 100% 100% 100% 93% A 0 201 172 181 201 755

2007 Q3 97% 93% 90% 100% 97"10 A E 202 169 173 196 740

..

:s 2007Q4 87% 100% 100% 100% 97%

a 2008Q1 100% 94% 94% 97% 94%

200802 83% 100% 97% 100% 97%

2008Q3 90% 100% 100% 100% 100%

2008 Q4 73% 100% 93% 100% 100%

2009Q1 97% 93% 100% 100% 100%

2009 Q2 94% 100% 100% 100% 100%

2009Q3 83% 93% 100% 90% 100%

2009 Q4 94% 93% 100% 97% 100%

2010 Q1 93% 100% 100% 100% 100%

201OQ2 93% 93% 100% 100% 100%

2010 Q3 87% 94% 100% 100% 100%

201OQ4 87% 93% 100% 100% 100%

MEAN 88% 95% 98% 99% 96%

Table 3 shows that the correlation between A and D (R2 = 0.8449) is stronger than the

correlation between site A and the other sites. From the mean of the quarterly data captured

(Table 4), we can observe that site D has more data completeness (99%) from which to

impute for site A. In addition, from the data site pairing (Table 5) it can be observed that site

A and D have more paired data to establish a better relationship than site A and the other

sites. Based on the information above, we will use multiple imputations and bootstrapping

methods to generate the necessary data from Site D to impute on Site A missing values.

4
Linear Regression and Correlation for Site A vs. Site 0

Regression Statistics

Multiple R 0.919173221

RSquare 0.844879411

Adjusted RSquare 0.844673408

Standard Error 3.301408004

Observations 755

linear Regression Results

Site A vs. Site 0

.~..--------

R' = 0.8449 A.<-<l30

'W - i

I

20 -: ~."'7 U::i rm ". ~----+

i

10 to t-----

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

50 +-----

60

Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95%

Intercept 2.218223276 0.22529593 9.845820463 1.34608E-21 1.775940467 2.660506086

XVariable 1 0.855135619 0.013352878 64.04129849 6.1227E-307 0.828922326 0.881348912

ANOVA

df SS MS F Significance F

Regression 1 44701.14605 44701.14605 4101.287912 6.1227E-307

Residual 753 8207.168992 10.89929481

Total 754 52908.31505

5
3. Bootstrapping and Imputation

The bootstrapping method randomly applies real residuals from the linear regression to the

imputed current-period Site A values. A 1000 bootstrap runs adds a random residual to the

"best guess" missing values yielding the same conditional variance as the original variable.

A summary of the bootstrapping statistics is presented in Table 5, where the bootstrapping

residual is -5.148082e·4

•

Table 5 - Bootstrapping Summary Statistics

Average -5.1480820 e"

SO 0.1189829967

Max 0.4526497298

Min -0.3519216842

Finally to impute the missing data using the bootstrapping residual we use the following

equation, based on the linear regression from Site A vs. Site 0:

Site A concentration = Intercept + x Variable * Site 0 concentration +

bootstrapping residual

Where:

Intercept = 2.2182232761572 (from linear regression)

x Variable = 0.855135618643403 (from linear regression)

Bootstrapping residual = -5.1480820307 e-4

Site 0 concentration = values in Site 0

After applying the above equation to all missing data in Site A, we recalculated the design

values based on the three-year average of the annual mean concentrations for all existing

years in Site A (Site 39-081-0017). Table 6 shows Site 39-081-0017 before and after the

imputation of missing data. Also the "new" site (with imputed values) shows a "new" passing

DV for 2008-2010.

Table 6 - Comparison Between Original and Imputed Values for the SteubenvilleWeirton area from 2004 to 2010

Annual Design Value

Site Year 2004- 2005· 2006- 2007- 2008-

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

OLD 39-081-0017 15.9 16.4 13.8 16.2 14.3 12.1 12.7 15.4 15.5 14.7 14.2 13.0

NEW 39-081-0017 15.8 16.7 14.1 16.7 14.5 12.4 13.2 15.5 15.8 15.1 14.5 13.3

incomplete data (quarter with <75% capture)

6
Ohio EPA believes that the above analysis has generated the most statistically significant

results yielding to the "best" missing data statistically possible. This analysis should also

satisfy US EPA requirements in terms of total percentage data capture and design values

under the PM2.5 annual standard (15.0j..lg/m3

).

7
References:

Brownstone, David and Robert Valleta. 2000. Draft for JEP Econometrics Symposium. "The

bootstrap and multiple imputations".

Harrel, Frank E. Jr. 2001. Springer Series in Statistics. "Regression modeling strategies:

with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis".

Mooney, Christopher Z., Robert D. Duval, Robert Duval. 1993. Sage Publications Inc.

"Bootstrapping: a nonparametric approach to statistical inference" Issues 94-95.

8
Appendix F-1

Public Notice
Public Notice

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency

Redesignation and Maintenance Plan for the Ohio Portion of the

Steubenville-Weirton, WV-OH

Annual PM2.5 Nonattainment Area

Jefferson County, Ohio

Notice is hereby given that the Director of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency

(Ohio EPA) is requesting that the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.

EPA) revise the current air quality designation for the Ohio portion (Jefferson County) of

the Steubenville-Weirton, WV-OH area, to attainment with respect to the 1997 annual

PMZ.

5 national ambient air quality standard (NAAOS). Air quality monitoring data

collected between 2008 and 2010 in the region demonstrate attainment of the NAAOS

and there is evidence that the improved air quality is due to permanent, enforceable

emission reductions. In addition, existing requirements are sufficient to maintain the

1997 annual PMZ.5 standard in this area at least ten years into the future.

Computer models show that eXisting state and federal emission reduction requirements

are sufficient to attain and maintain the NAAOS in the Steubenville-Weirton area.

Therefore, Ohio EPA proposes to utilize existing emission inventory information and

projections of future emissions as the demonstration of the ability to maintain the

NAAOS in the Steubenville-Weirton area in the future.

The Steubenville-Weirton area is currently designated as nonattainment for the 1997

annual PMz.5 standard. As part of an acceptable maintenance plan, Ohio EPA has

developed, as required, a contingency plan to provide for additional emission reductions

if a violation of the NAAOS is monitored after the area has been redesignated.

The State of Ohio proposes to:

1. Request the U.S. EPA redesignate the Ohio portion of the Steubenville-Weirton,

WV-OH area to attainment with respect to the 1997 annual PMZ•5 NAAOS and

revise the maintenance plan. This request will document that existing

enforceable control measures are responsible for the observed improvement in

air quality.

2. Designate existing controls as sufficient to maintain the NAAOS into the future.

3. Commit to the proposed contingency plan.

These actions must be noticed to allow public comment and to satisfy USEPA

requirements for public involvement in SIP-related activities. This notice addresses Ohio

EPA's reliance on the emission projections as evidence of attainment and maintenance

and the commitment to institute contingency measures if ambient exceedances or
violations trigger the contingency plan requirements. Written comments will be received

on or before April 3, 2012 at the following address:

E-mail: erica.fetty@epa.state.oh.us

Mailing address: Erica Fetty

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, DAPC

Lazarus Government Center

P.O. Box 1049

Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049

Phone: (614) 644-2310

Pursuant to Section 119.03 of the Ohio Revised Code, a pUblic hearing on this

redesignation request will be conducted as follows: April 3, 2012 at 3:00PM Steubenville

Library - Schiappa Branch, 4141 Mall Drive, Steubenville, OH 43952.

All interested persons are entitled to attend or be represented at the hearing and give

written or oral comments on these changes. All oral comments presented at the

hearing, and all written statements submitted at the hearing or to the above address by

the close of business on April 3, 2012 will be considered by Ohio EPA prior to final

action on this redesignation. Written statements submitted after April 3, 2012 may be

considered as time and circumstances permit, but will not be part of the official record of

the hearing.

This redesignation and maintenance request is available on Ohio EPA, DAPC's web

page for electronic downloading. The URL is:

http://www.epa.ohio.gov/dapc/SIP/annual.aspx. Questions regarding accessing theweb

site should be directed to Arunee Niamlarb at 614-728-1342; other questions or

comments about this document should be directed to Erica Fetty at (614) 644-2310,

Erica.Fetty@epa.state.oh.us or mailed to Erica Fetty at the above address.
Appendix F-2

Public Comments and Public

Hearing Transcript
JACK CERA

State Representative

March 22, 2012

Erica Fetty

Division of Air Pollution Control

Ohio Environmental Protections Agency

Box 1049

Columbus, OH 43216-1049

RE: Requested Recognition of Improved Air Quality in Steubenville Area

Dear Erica:

It is my understanding that the State of Ohio will seek recognition for the improved air quality in

the Steubenville-Weirton WV area from the US EPA. This letter is written in support of the

efforts being made in this regard.

According to recent information shared with my office, the Steubenville area is meeting the 1997

federal fine particulate standard. Over the course of the last decade and a half, this region of

the state has worked hard to improve air qualityby enforcing clean air standards set by the

federal government. In turn, the monitoring and measuring of air pollutants taken over time

have dramatically improved, thus laying the groundwork for the re-designation of air quality.

This environmental change is definitely a stepping stone for the local community. Not only is it a

huge step forward in protecting the pUblic's health and contributing to climate change, it is also a

win-win for the community as a place that is more appealing to business ventures, new and old

alike.

The changes made will help ensure a more promising future for the next generation. With all

these positive attributes in mind, I am wholeheartedly supportive of the State's efforts in seeking

this re-designation.

Sincerely,

JCK~ S te Representative

th House District

JC/PDW

Committees:

Agriculture and Natnral Resources

Financial Institutions, Housing and

Urban Development

Public Utilities

www.house.state.oh.us

77 S. High Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215-6111

Contact Information:

Office: 614-466-3735

Toll-Free: 1-800-282-0253

FAX: 614-719-6995

Email: district95@ohr.state.oh.us
BEFORE THE OHIO EPA

IN RE:

Redesignation Particulate Matter 2.5

Steubenville Area

Public Hearing before Moderator Mary

McCarron, taken at the Steubenville Library -

Schiappa Branch, 414 Mall Drive, Steubenville,

Ohio, at 3:00 p.m. on April 3, 2012.
2

1 P-R-O-C-E-E-D-I-N-G-S

2 MODERATOR McCARRON: Today's date is

3 April 3, 2012. My name is Mary McCarron, and I'm

4 presiding over today's hearing.

5 The State of Ohio plans to ask U.S. EPA

6 to officially recognize the air quality in the

7 Steubenville-Weirton, West Virginia area meets

8 the 1997 federal fine particulate standard.

9 At this time there is nobody present to

10 provide testimony, so we will go off the record

11 for a half an hour.

12

13

(Break taken until 3:30.)

MODERATOR McCARRON: The time is now

14 3:30 p.m., and we will end this hearing.

15

16

17

* * *

(Thereupon, the hearing was adjourned at

18 3:30 p.m., on April 3, 2012.)

19

20

21

22

23

24
3

1 C E R T I FIe ATE

2 - - -

3 STATE OF OHIO

SS:

4 COUNTY OF FRANKLIN

5 I, Jennifer L. parish, Registered

6 Professional Reporter, do hereby certify that the

7 foregoing is a true, correct, and complete

8 transcription of the above-mentioned audiotaped

9 public hearing before the Ohio Environmental

10 Protection Agency to the best of my ability.

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

DATED this 16th day of April, 2012.

JENNIFER L. PARISH, RPR

NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF OHIO

18 My Commission Expires: November 23, 2012.

19

20

21

22

23

24