alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER



Solely for the purposes of complying with
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Andre Scholz, the undersigned President
and Chief Executive Officer of Kiwibox.Com, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Report”) as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof:



| | 1. | Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | That the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                   | 
|---------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Andre Scholz                   | 
|Andre Scholz                       | 
|President, Chief Executive Officer | 
|(principal executive officer)      | 
|                                   | 
|Dated:  April 16, 2012             |
Exhibit 23

               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

We have issued our report dated July 20,  2000,  accompanying  the  consolidated
financial  statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Vasomedical,
Inc.  and  Subsidiary  on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31,  2000.  We
hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  of  said  report  in the
Registration  Statements of Vasomedical,  Inc. and Subsidiary on Forms S-3 (File
No. 333-34044,  effective April 12, 2000, File No. 333-60341, effective December
28, 1998, File No. 333-33319,  effective August 21, 1997, and File No. 33-62329,
effective  September 18, 1995) and on Forms S-8 (File No.  333-85457,  effective
August  18,  1999,  File No.  333-85455,  effective  August 18,  1999,  File No.
333-60471,  effective August 3, 1998, File No. 333-11579, effective September 6,
1996, File No. 333-11581,  effective September 6, 1996, and File No. 333- 11583,
effective September 6, 1996).


GRANT THORNTON LLP

Melville, New York
July 20, 2000
Briana Washington GLOVER, and Husband, Randie Janson Glover, Individually v. The CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, a North Carolina Hospital Authority, d/b/a Carolinas Healthcare System, Carolinas Medical Center, Carolinas Healthcare System University, Carolinas Medical Center-University, CMC-University, Carolinas Healthcare System Mercy, Carolinas Medical Center Mercy, CMC-Mercy, Greater Carolinas Women's Center, and Carolinas Laboratory Network; and Glen Ellis Powell, II, MD, Individually

No. 356P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

R. Kent Brown, Attorney at Law, Jon Ryan Moore, Attorney at Law, Paige L. Pahlke, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, John R. Taylor, Attorney at Law, Robert E. Zaytoun, Attorney at Law, Matthew D. Ballew, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Glover, Briana Washington, et al.

John H. Beyer, Attorney at Law, Katherine H. Graham, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, et al.

Daniel N. Mullins, Attorney at Law, Durham.

William Conor Brockett, Associate General Counsel.

Phillip T. Jackson, Attorney at Law, Asheville, for N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys.

*103***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th of October 2018 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants on the 1st of November 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st of November 2018 by Defendants for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Ervin and Davis, J. recused
Exhibit 23


              Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants



We have issued our report dated July 27,  2001,  accompanying  the  consolidated
financial  statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Vasomedical,
Inc. and  Subsidiaries  on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2001.  We
hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  of  said  report  in the
Registration Statements of Vasomedical, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Forms S-3 (File
No. 333-34044,  effective April 12, 2000, File No. 333-60341, effective December
28, 1998, File No. 333-33319,  effective August 21, 1997, and File No. 33-62329,
effective  September 18, 1995) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333- 42692,  effective
on August 1, 2000,  File No.  333-85457,  effective  August 18,  1999,  File No.
333-85455,  effective August 18, 1999, File No.  333-60471,  effective August 3,
1998,  File No.  333-11579,  effective  September 6, 1996,  File No.  333-11581,
effective  September 6, 1996,  and File No.  333-11583,  effective  September 6,
1996).


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
GRANT THORNTON LLP

Melville, New York
July 27, 2001
CABARRUS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES TEACHERS' & STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, et al.

371PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 22, 2019

Blake W. Thomas, Deputy General Counsel, Matthew W. Sawchak, Solicitor General, Ryan Y. Park, Deputy Solicitor General, Joseph A. Newsome, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Board of Trustees Teachers and State Employees' Retirement System, et al.

Michael Crowell, Attorney at Law, Deborah R. Stagner, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Lindsey Vance Smith, Attorney at Law, for Cabarrus County Board of Education.

Elizabeth L. Troutman, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Allison B. Schafer, Legal Counsel/Director of Policy, Jill R. Wilson, Attorney at Law, for N.C. School Boards Association.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 22nd of May 2019 by Respondent-Appellant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of May 2019."

Respondent-Appellant shall have up to and including the 5th day of June 2019 to file and serve his/ her brief with this Court.
s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 19, 2014

No. 04-14-00452-CV

Mark HART and Angelica Hart,

Appellant

v.

FLAGSHIP HOMES, LTD. d/b/a/ Prestige Homes,

Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-04333

Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding

No. 04-14-00568-CV

Julian CALDERAS, Jr. and Erica Calderas,

Appellants

v.

FLAGSHIP HOMES, LTD. d/b/a Prestige Homes,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-04330

Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding

No. 04-14-00597-CV

Thomas H. VEITCH and Anne Veitch,

Appellants

v.

FLAGSHIP HOMES, LTD. d/b/a/ Prestige Homes,

Appellee

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-04337
Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellants' first unopposed motion for extension of time to file reply brief is hereby 

GRANTED. Time is extended to December 1, 2014.

It is so ORDERED on November 19, 2014.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ___________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, Harry Chew, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of    Bi-optic Ventures, Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period

ended May 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission

(the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)

or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of

the Company.







Date:  July 20, 2004



/s/  Harry Chew

Harry Chew, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-60117 Conference Calendar

MICHAEL GEROME WESTON, Petitioner-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:01-CV-12-WS

-------------------- December 11, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Michael Gerome Weston, Mississippi prisoner # 04120-043, challenges the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he asserted that counsel had been ineffective at sentencing and that his sentence violated Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). The district court determined that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 because Weston challenged the validity of his sentence rather than the manner in which it was being executed but had not demonstrated that relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 was inadequate.No. 01-60117 -2- Weston argues that dismissal was error and that his claims were properly brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 because Apprendi had not been decided at the time he filed his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and because he cannot meet the requirements for filing a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. His arguments are unconvincing. As the district court determined, 28 U.S.C. § 2255 provides the primary means of collaterally attacking a federal conviction and sentence. Tolliver v. Dobre , 211 F.3d 876, 877 (5th Cir. 2000). Although Weston may pursue 28 U.S.C. § 2241 relief upon a showing that relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is inadequate, he has failed to make such a showing. The fact that Weston cannot meet the requirements for filing a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is insufficient. See id. at 878. Additionally, Weston does not present a prima facie Apprendi claim because the 176-month sentence he received does not exceed the 20-year statutory maximum for a cocaine-base-distribution offense involving unaggravated drug quantities. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C) (West Supp. 2000). Apprendi thus does not apply. See United States v. Doggett , 230 F.3d 160, 165 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1152 (2001). That being so, this court will not address the remainder of Weston’s arguments. Weston has not demonstrated any error in the district court’s judgment, and the judgment is AFFIRMED. Weston’s motion to amend his § 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition to supplement hisNo. 01-60117 -3- Apprendi claim and his motion to supplement his reply brief are
DENIED. JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Leonard Albert VEGA, Appellant.

WD 80413

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: February 27, 2018

Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Irene Karns, Special Public Defender, Columbia, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Before Division One: Thomas H. Newton, Presiding Judge, and Victor C. Howard and Karen King Mitchell, Judges

**Order**

Per Curiam:

Leonard Vega appeals, following a jury trial, his conviction for first-degree drug trafficking under § 195.222, for which he was sentenced as a prior offender to fourteen years' imprisonment. Vega raises one claim on appeal; he argues that the trial court erred in admitting evidence that he assaulted and threatened a witness in his case because, he claims, this evidence constituted improper propensity evidence and violated his right to be tried for only the crime charged. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
## Development of Chemical Precipitation Purchased Equipment Costs: **Clarifiers**

Purchased Equipment Costs are the sum of the following cost elements: (1) Pump Costs (2) Tank Costs (3) Chemical Feed Sy stem Costs (4) Mixer Costs (5) Clarifier Costs (6) Filter Press Costs (7) Sand Filter Costs

**Legend** Each cost component includes the cost of freight and associated ancillary equipm ent such as piping, valves, and controllers.

This Excel workbook supports EPA's derivation of cost element (5) using information provided by vendors.
The following worksheet presents the calculation of clarifier tank volume based on vendor provided information. Clarifier tank volume was used to develop purchase costs for the clarifier tank. W alker Process Equipment provided tank diameter and height for two FGD W astewater Flows which were used to calculate tank volume and to develop a relationship between flow rate and tank volume. EPA then used the relationship to extrapolate tank volumes for the other clarifier flow rates, provided by

Siem ens.

Vendor provided information. Refer to DCN SE01825.A32 for the source for these data.

Vendor provided information. Refer to DCN SE01825.A30 for the source of these data.Each cost component includes the cost of freight and associated ancillary equipm ent such as piping, valves, and

The following worksheet presents the calculation of clarifier tank volume based on vendor provided information. Clarifier tank volume was used to develop purchase costs for the clarifier tank. W alker Process Equipment provided tank diameter and height for two FGD W astewater Flows which were used to calculate tank volume and to develop a relationship between flow rate and tank volume. EPA then used the relationship to extrapolate tank volumes for the other clarifier flow

Vendor provided information. Refer to DCN SE01825.A32 for the source for these data. Vendor provided information. Refer to DCN SE01825.A30 for the source of these data.

### FGD Wastewater Flow, gpm **Diameter, ft Height, ft**  **Volume, cu ft Volume, gal**  30 15 12.5 2208.932335 16523 75 20 13.5 4241.150082 31724 100 12 40168.8 140 14 53680.8 250 18 90838.8 350 22 124618.8 470 26 165154.8 550 28 192178.8 700 32 242848.8

y = 337.8x + 6388.8 R2 = 1

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80**V o** **l u** **m e** **, g** **a l** 

**FGD Wastewater Flow, gpm** 

# Clarifier T **ank V olume**  **vs. FGD W astewater**  **Flow**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission. 

# Date and Time:

Thursday, March 12, 2009, at 10 a.m. 

# Place:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor). 

# Status:

This meeting will be open to the public. 

# Items To Be Discussed:

Correction and approval of minutes. 

Draft Advisory Opinion 2009-01: Socialist Workers Party by counsel, Michael Krinsky, Esq., and Lindsey Frank, Esq. 

Management and administrative matters. 

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Mary Dove, Commission Secretary, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the hearing date. 

# Person to Contact for Information:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-5342 Filed 3-11-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
STATE v. Jesse James TUCKER

330A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 22, 2019

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, For Tucker, Jesse James

Sonya M. Calloway-Durham, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina

Heidi E. Reiner, Assistant Appellate Defender

Brandy Cook, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of August 2019 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of August 2019."
V 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5090 

For the relief of Manuel Bartsch. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 4, 2006 

Mr. GILLMOR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Manuel Bartsch. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MANUEL 

4 BARTSCH. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Manuel Bartsch shall be eligible for issuance of an 

8 immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 

9 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil10 ing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 

11 section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to 

12 lawful permanent resident. 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5090 IH 

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Manuel Bartsch 

2 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci3 fied in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have en4 tered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, 

5 be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of 

6 the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 

7 enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Manuel Bartsch, the Secretary of State shall in16 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 

17 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi18 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun19 try of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immi20 gration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total 

21 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na22 tives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5090 IH 

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Manuel Bartsch shall not, 

2 by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, privi3 lege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2063-2064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-543]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13126-001]


MARMC Enterprises, LLC; Notice of Application for Amendment of 
Preliminary Permit Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions 
To Intervene, and Protests

January 7, 2009.
    On October 20, 2008, MARMC Enterprises, LLC filed an amendment to

[[Page 2064]]

their preliminary permit application, pursuant to section 4(f) of the 
Federal Power Act, proposing to study the feasibility of Algiers Cutoff 
Project. The proposed project would be located on the Mississippi River 
in Orleans Parish, Louisiana. The project uses no dam or impoundment.
    The proposed description of the amendment: After performing cursory 
hydrology and bathymetric studies, the permittee determined that the 
proposed area might not be the optimal site for deployment of the 
project. The permittee is requesting to extend the upstream boundary to 
mile marker to 92.5.
    FERC Contact: Patricia W. Gillis, 202-502-8735.
    Deadline for filing comments or motions to intervene: 30 days from 
the issuance of this notice. Comments and motions to intervene may be 
filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) 
and the instructions on the Commission's Web site under the ``e-
Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, documents may be 
paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight copies should be 
mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For more 
information on how to submit these types of filings please go to the 
Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or 
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-
13126-001) in the docket number field to access the document. For 
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

 Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-543 Filed 1-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P