Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 10, 2009 / Rules and Regulations 10171 

effective date of this AD in accordance with 

Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–25– 

3249 or A340–25–4245, both dated May 3, 

2005, as applicable, is acceptable for 

compliance with the requirements of those 

paragraphs. 

Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(m)(1) The Manager, International Branch, 

ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to approve 

AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the 

procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send 

information to ATTN: Vladimir Ulyanov, 

Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, 

ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425) 

227–1138; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using 

any approved AMOC on any airplane to 

which the AMOC applies, notify your 

appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the 

FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), 

or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. 

(2) AMOCs approved previously in 

accordance with AD 2006–26–12 are 

approved as AMOCs for the corresponding 

provisions of this AD. 

Related Information 

(n) EASA airworthiness directives 2007– 

0281 and 2007–0282, both dated November 

6, 2007, also address the subject of this AD. 

Material Incorporated by Reference 

(o) You must use the service information 

contained in Table 1 of this AD to do the 

actions required by this AD, as applicable, 

unless the AD specifies otherwise. 

TABLE 1—ALL MATERIAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Document Revision Date 

Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–25–3249 .............................................................................. Revision 01 ................... July 10, 2007. 

Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340–25–4245 .............................................................................. Revision 01 ................... July 10, 2007. 

Airbus Service Bulletin A330–25–3227, excluding Appendix 01 ......................................................... Revision 01 ................... May 3, 2005. 

Airbus Service Bulletin A330–25–3249 ................................................................................................ Original .......................... May 3, 2005. 

Airbus Service Bulletin A340–25–4230, excluding Appendix 01 ......................................................... Revision 01 ................... May 3, 2005. 

Airbus Service Bulletin A340–25–4245 ................................................................................................ Original .......................... May 3, 2005. 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference of 

the service information contained in Table 2 

of this AD under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. 

TABLE 2—NEW MATERIAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Document Revision Date 

Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–25–3249 .............................................................................. Revision 01 ................... July 10, 2007. 

Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340–25–4245 .............................................................................. Revision 01 ................... July 10, 2007. 

(2) The Director of the Federal Register 

previously approved the incorporation by 

reference of the service information 

contained in Table 3 of this AD on February 

8, 2007 (72 FR 256, January 4, 2007). 

TABLE 3—MATERIAL PREVIOUSLY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Document Revision Date 

Airbus Service Bulletin A330–25–3227, excluding Appendix 01 ......................................................... Revision 01 ................... May 3, 2005. 

Airbus Service Bulletin A330–25–3249 ................................................................................................ Original .......................... May 3, 2005. 

Airbus Service Bulletin A340–25–4230, excluding Appendix 01 ......................................................... Revision 01 ................... May 3, 2005. 

Airbus Service Bulletin A340–25–4245 ................................................................................................ Original .......................... May 3, 2005. 

(3) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Airbus SAS—Airworthiness 

Office—EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 

31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; fax +33 5 61 

93 45 80, e-mail airworthiness.A330- 

A340@airbus.com. 

(4) You may review copies of the service 

information at the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, call 

425–227–1221 or 425–227–1152. 

(5) You may also review copies of the 

service information that is incorporated by 

reference at the National Archives and 

Records Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of this 

material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go 

to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/ 

code_of_federal_regulations/ 

ibr_locations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, February 

20, 2009. 

Ali Bahrami 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. E9–4649 Filed 3–9–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 73 

[Docket No. FAA–2009–0108; Airspace 

Docket No. 08–ASW–8] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Change of Using Agency for Restricted 

Area 6320; Matagorda, TX 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action changes the using 

agency of R–6320, Matagorda, TX, from 

United States Customs Service’’ to 

‘‘Continental North American 

10172 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 10, 2009 / Rules and Regulations 

Aerospace Defense Command Region 

(CONR).’’ The FAA is taking this action 

in response to a request from the United 

States Air Force (USAF), supported by 

United States Customs and Border 

Protection (legacy United States 

Customs Service), to reflect an 

administrative change of responsibility 

for the restricted area. There are no 

changes to the boundaries; designated 

altitudes; time of designation; or 

activities conducted within the affected 

restricted area. 

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, May 7, 

2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Colby Abbott, Airspace and Rules 

Group, Office of System Operations 

Airspace and AIM, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; 

telephone: (202) 267–8783. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

On December 10, 2008, the USAF 

requested that the FAA change the using 

agency for R–6320 from, ‘‘United States 

Customs Service’’ to ‘‘Continental North 

American Aerospace Defense Command 

Region (CONR).’’ The USAF request was 

based on their interest in retaining the 

restricted area and expected funding in 

the future to purchase and house 

another aerostat system within that 

restricted airspace. United States 

Customs and Border Protection (legacy 

United States Customs Service) 

confirmed they have no interest in 

maintaining operational control over R– 

6320 and agreed to relinquish the using 

agency responsibility to CONR. 

Coordination with Houston Air Route 

Traffic Control Center was effected prior 

to this using agency change request 

being submitted by the USAF. 

Section 73.63 of 14 CFR Part 73 was 

republished in FAA Order 7400.8R, 

dated February 5, 2009. 

The Rule 

This action amends Title 14 Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 73 by 

revising the using agency listed for R– 

6320, Matagorda, TX; transferring using 

agency responsibility for R–6320 from 

‘‘United States Customs Service’’ to 

‘‘Continental North American 

Aerospace Defense Command Region 

(CONR).’’ This is an administrative 

change and does not affect the 

boundaries, designated altitudes, or 

activities conducted within the 

restricted area; therefore, notice and 

public procedures under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) 

are unnecessary. 

The FAA has determined that this 

action only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is 

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that will only affect air 

traffic procedures and air navigation, it 

is certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

Environmental Review 

The FAA has determined that this 

action qualifies for categorical exclusion 

under the National Environmental 

Policy Act in accordance with 311d., 

FAA Order 1050.1E, Environmental 

Impacts: Policies and Procedures. This 

airspace action is not expected to cause 

any potentially significant 

environmental impacts, and no 

extraordinary circumstances exist that 

warrant preparation of an 

environmental assessment. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 73 

Airspace, Prohibited areas, Restricted 

areas. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

■ In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 73, as follows: 

PART 73—SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 73 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 73.63 [Amended] 

■ 2. § 73.63 is amended as follows: 

* * * * * 

R–6320 Matagorda, TX [Amended] 

By removing the words ‘‘Using 

agency. United States Customs Service’’ 

and inserting the words ‘‘Using agency. 

Continental North American Aerospace 

Defense Command Region (CONR).’’ 

* * * * * 

Issued in Washington, DC, March 2, 2009. 

Edith V. Parish, 

Manager, Airspace and Rules Group. 

[FR Doc. E9–4948 Filed 3–9–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

24 CFR Part 3500 

[Docket No. FR–5180–F–05] 

RIN 2502–AI61 

Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act 

(RESPA): Rule To Simplify and 

Improve the Process of Obtaining 

Mortgages and Reduce Consumer 

Settlement Costs; Further Deferred 

Applicability Date for the Revised 

Definition of ‘‘Required Use’’ and 

Solicitation of Public Comment on 

Withdrawal of Required Use Provision 

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant 

Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing 

Commissioner, HUD. 

ACTION: Final rule; request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: This final rule delays the 

effective date of the definition of 

‘‘required use’’ as revised by HUD’s 

November 17, 2008, final rule amending 

its RESPA regulations, until July 16, 

2009. The November 17, 2008, final rule 

revised HUD’s RESPA regulations to 

further the purposes of RESPA by 

requiring more timely and effective 

disclosures related to mortgage 

settlement costs for federally related 

mortgage loans to consumers. The final 

rule revised the existing definition of 

‘‘required use,’’ which revision was 

directed to enhancing protections for 

consumers from certain practices 

conducted by affiliated business 

arrangements. The revised definition of 

‘‘required use’’ would have become 

effective on January 16, 2009. However, 

on January 15, 2009, HUD published a 

final rule that delayed the effective date 

of the definition of ‘‘required use’’ from 

January 16, 2009, to April 16, 2009, due 

to litigation by the National Association 

of Home Builders, et al., around the 

time of issuance of the final rule. For 

this same reason, HUD is further 

delaying the effective date of required 

use until July 16, 2009. 

In this rule, HUD also solicits 

comment on withdrawing the revised 

definition of ‘‘required use’’ from the 

November 17, 2008, final rule. HUD will 

consider these comments before 

pursuing new rulemaking process on 

this definition. Since promulgating the 

rule on November 17, 2008, HUD has 

determined to reevaluate the scope and 

operation of the required use provision. 

New rulemaking would give HUD the 

opportunity to present for public 

consideration a new proposal based 

upon HUD’s reevaluation of the 

required use provision to help ensure 

better consumer protections.