alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5294 

To amend the Florida National Forest Land Management Act of 2003 to 

authorize the conveyance of an additional tract of National Forest System land under that Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 4, 2006 

Mr. CRENSHAW (for himself and Mr. BOYD) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Florida National Forest Land Management 

Act of 2003 to authorize the conveyance of an additional 

tract of National Forest System land under that Act, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCES UNDER FLORIDA NATIONAL 

4 FOREST LAND MANAGEMENT ACT OF 2003. 

5 (a) ADDITIONAL CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—Sub6 section (b) of section 3 of the Florida National Forest 

7 Land Management Act of 2003 (Public Law 108–152; 

8 117 Stat. 1919) is amended— 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5294 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph 

2 (17); 

3 (2) by redesignating paragraph (18) as para4 graph (19); 

5 (3) by inserting after paragraph (17) the fol6 lowing new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(18) tract W–1979, located in Leon County 

8 consisting of approximately 114 acres, within T. 1 

9 S., R. 1 W., sec.25; and’’; and 

10 (4) in paragraph (19), as so redesignated, by 

11 striking ‘‘(17)’’ and inserting ‘‘(18)’’. 

12 (b) USE OF PROCEEDS.—Subsection (i)(2) of such 

13 section (117 Stat. 1921) is amended— 

14 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara15 graph (A); 

16 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub17 paragraph (B) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

18 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub19 paragraph: 

20 ‘‘(C) acquisition, construction, or mainte21 nance of administrative improvements for units 

22 of the National Forest System in the State.’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
**Exhibit      32.1**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |                                                                                                                                                          |                                   |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| August                18, 2006 | By:                                                                                                                                                 | /s/ EARL                W. ABBOTT |
|                           | Earl                    W. AbbottPresident                    and Chief Executive Officer (Principal                    Executive                    Officer) |

|                           |                                                                                                                                               |                                      |
|--------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| August                18, 2006 | By:                                                                                                                                      | /s/ GEORGE                DRAZENOVIC |
|                           | George                    DrazenovicChief                    Financial Officer (Principal                    Financial                    Officer) |

----
1

Sutton, Lisa

From: Maietta, Anthony

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 4:33 PM

To: Brachtl, Megan; Sutton, Lisa

Cc: Portanova, Mary; Blakley, Pamela

Subject: FW: Wisconsin: Final SIP Call: Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction 

That should be all the R5 states.  

Have a good weekend!

‐Tony

Anthony Maietta

EPA Region 5

maietta.anthony@epa.gov

(312) 353‐8777

From: Czerniak, George  

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 3:31 PM

To: Portanova, Mary; Maietta, Anthony

Subject: FW: Wisconsin: Final SIP Call: Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction  

From: Czerniak, George  

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:48 PM

To: 'Sponseller, Bart A ‐ DNR'

Subject: Wisconsin: Final SIP Call: Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction  

Bart  

This message is to notify you about the final action the EPA Administrator signed today to ensure States have in place

air pollution rules that apply to sources at all times, including when the source is operating during periods of startup,

shutdown, or malfunction (SSM).  

This action responds to a Petition for Rulemaking filed by the Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians concerning the

treatment of excess emissions at industrial facilities during SSM operations, specifically how those emissions are

treated in State Implementation Plan (SIP) provisions that the EPA previously approved. Also, as part of this action,

EPA has revised and clarified its policy concerning SSM provisions consistent with the Clean Air Act.

The EPA is calling for 36 States to make changes to their SIPs, to protect public health and ensure consistency with the

Clean Air Act and the EPA’s current SSM Policy.  These States will have 18 months to submit revisions of their State plan

to EPA. The revised SIPs are due to EPA by November 22, 2016.  Wisconsin is NOT currently included in this final SIP Call.

To inform you of the details on the final action, including EPA’s policy clarifications concerning SSM provisions, we

have posted a pre‐publication version of the action on our website

at:  http://www.epa.gov/airquality/urbanair/sipstatus/emissions.html.  

If you or your staff have questions, please contact Mary Portanova, portanova.mary@epa.gov, (312) 353‐5954.
2

George
<PAGE>

                EXHIBIT 23.1 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements 
of Tricord Systems, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-65784, 33-76532, 333-04701 
and 333-58195) of our reports, dated March 5, 1999, except as to the 
information in Note 7, for which the date is March 17, 1999, on our audits of
the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of 
Tricord Systems, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the years 
ended December 31, 1998, 1997, 1996, which reports are included or 
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                                PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 30, 1999
exv10w35






EXHIBIT 10.35



October 14, 2010




Travelport, LP

Travelport Global Distribution System B.V.

300 Galleria Parkway, N.W.

Atlanta, GA 30339




	 	 	 

	Re:

	 	Tenth Amendment to Subscriber Services Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2007 (“Agreement”)
between Travelport, LP (“Travelport”), Travelport Global Distribution System B.V., (“TGDS”)
and Orbitz Worldwide, LLC (“Subscriber”)





Ladies and Gentlemen:



This letter constitutes a Tenth Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Agreement referenced above.
Capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined shall be used as defined in the
Agreement.



Effective as of the date of this Amendment (“Amendment Effective Date”), Travelport, TGDS and
Subscriber hereby agree as follows:





	 	1.	 	The Custom Terms and Conditions Attachment (Galileo Services) — RoW is amended as
set forth in Exhibit A.
	 
	 	2.	 	General. This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of
and be enforceable by the Parties hereto or their successors in interest, except as
expressly provided in the Agreement. Each Party to this Amendment agrees that, other than
as expressly set out in this Amendment, nothing in this Amendment is intended to alter the
rights, duties and obligations of the Parties under the Agreement, which shall remain in
full force and effect as amended hereby. In the event of a conflict between the terms and
conditions of this Amendment and the terms and conditions of the Agreement, the terms and
conditions of this Amendment shall govern. This Amendment may be executed by the Parties
in separate counterparts and each counterpart shall be deemed to be an original, but all
such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument.




1









 












The Parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by the signatures of their respective
authorized representatives.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	Orbitz Worldwide, LLC	 	Travelport, LP
	 	 	 	 	 	 	By: Travelport Holdings, LLC, its General 
Partner
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Signature:	 	/s/ Stephen Praven	 	Signature:	 	 /s/ Scott Hyden
	 	 	 	 	 	 	   
	 

	 	Name:
	 	Stephen Praven
	 	 	 	Name:
	 	Scott Hyden
	 

	 	Title:
	 	VP, Business Development
	 	 	 	Title:
	 	VP, Sales
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date: 10/25/10	 	Date: 10/25/10
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	Travelport Global Distribution System B.V.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	Signature:	 	/s/ Marco van Ieperen
	 	 	 	 	 	 	   
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Name:

Title:
	 	Marco van Ieperen

Director
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Date: 10/26/10







2
STATE v. David Alan KELLER

201A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 11, 2019

Emily H. Davis, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Keller, David Alan.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender.

M. Elizabeth Guzman, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Mike Miller, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 11th of July 2019 by Defendant:

*217"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of July 2019."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 26th day of August 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Joseph HUNAULT, Appellant.

ED 104626

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: October 17, 2017 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied December 19, 2017

Ellen H. Flottman, 1000 West Nifong, Bld. 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, for appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before: Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Hunault appeals the trial court's judgment and sentence upon his conviction by jury of one count of domestic assault in the first degree and one count of armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2017).
Amended and Restated Equity-Based Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 4.10 
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION 

AMENDED AND RESTATED EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION PLAN 
 This AMENDMENT TO THE LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION AMENDED AND RESTATED EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION PLAN (this “Amendment”), dated as of February 10, 2011, is made and
entered into by Lighting Science Group Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). Terms used in this Amendment with initial capital letters that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to
such terms in the Lighting Science Group Corporation Amended and Restated Equity-Based Compensation Plan (the “Plan”). 
 RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, Section 10(c) of the Plan provides that the
Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) may amend the Plan at any time, provided that any amendment to increase the share limitation shall be subject to the approval of the Company’s stockholders; 

WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan, subject to stockholder approval, to increase the aggregate number of shares of Stock
that may be issued or transferred under the Plan, as set forth in Section 4 of the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board
intends to submit this Amendment to the Company’s stockholders for approval no later than the next annual meeting of the stockholders. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with Section 10(c) of the Plan, the Company hereby amends the Plan as follows: 
 1. Section 4(a) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting said section in its entirety and substituting in lieu thereof the following: 

Section 4. Stock Subject to Plan. 
 (a) Overall Number of Shares Available for Delivery 

Subject to adjustment in a manner consistent with any adjustment made pursuant to Section 9, the total number of
shares of Stock reserved and available for delivery in connection with Awards under this Plan, from inception, is 28,000,000, 100% of which may be granted as Incentive Stock Options. 

2. This Amendment shall be effective on the date first set forth above. In the event stockholder approval of this Amendment is not
obtained within 12 months of the date the Board approved this Amendment, the additional shares added to the Plan pursuant to this Amendment shall not be available for grant as Incentive Stock Options within the meaning of Section 422 of the
Code. 
 3. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with
the provisions thereof. 
 [Signature page to follow] 

  
 1 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of
the date first written above. 
  

					
		  	LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION
			
		  	By:	 	 /s/ Gregory T. Kaiser

		  	Name:	 	 Gregory T. Kaiser

		  	Title:	 	 Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary



  
 2
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5232]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3302-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]


Kentucky; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-3302-EM), dated January 28, 2009, 
and related determinations.

Effective Date: February 5, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this emergency is closed effective February 5, 2009.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

Nancy Ward,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9-5232 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Optigenex Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Joseph W.
McSherry, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that :

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

                                               /s/ Joseph W. McSherry
                                               ----------------------
                                               Joseph W. McSherry
                                               Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 23, 2005
STATE v. Malon Kysheef GRIFFIN

147P19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Anne Bleyman, Attorney at Law, for Griffin, Malon Kysheef.

Carole Biggers, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Seth H. Edwards, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd of May 2019 by State of NC to Deem Response to Petition for Discretionary Review Timely Filed:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
### U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention (OCSPP) 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. (Mailcode 7101 M) Washington, D.C. 20460

OPPTS-RCS-OMB-7f (revised 11/15/2010) If you have any questions about this regulatory action or this documentation, please call the contact: Name: eMail: Phone: 

### Title of Action: 

## Documentation of Changes Made During Review Under Executive Order 12866

Docket #: EPA-HQ- FRL#: RIN: 2070-

This action was submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). According to section 6(a)(3)(E) of the Executive Order, whenever the Agency makes publicly available an action that was reviewed under Executive Order 12866, the Agency is also required to:

(1) Make available to the public a copy of the information that was provided to OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) for review under the Executive Order, i.e., the text of the draft action and, if applicable, an assessment of the potential costs and benefits; as well as additional information required for those actions that are determined to be economically significant under section 3(f) of the Executive Order (see section 6(a)(3)(B) & (C)); (2) Identify for the public any substantive changes made to the draft submitted to OMB, using a method that is complete, clear and simple; and (3) Identify for the public those substantive changes made at the suggestion or recommendation of OIRA/OMB. 

### For this action, were substantive changes made during the review? [Check the appropriate answer.]
Yes. [The information identified in items 1-3 below is included in the docket, as applicable.] No. [Only the information identified in item 1 below is included in the docket.] 

### Accordingly, the Agency has included the following information in the public docket for this action: [Check the appropriate box(es).]
(2) Documentation of any substantive changes that were made to the draft document that was submitted to OIRA/OMB for review, when compared with what completed review, using one of the following methods (select one): (1) A copy of the information that was submitted to OIRA for review under the Executive Order.

(3) Documentation of those substantive changes made at the suggestion or recommendation of OMB , if any, are identified in the document using one of the following methods (select one): (a) A copy of the draft document submitted, with redline and strikeout to show all the substantive changes that were made during the review. (b) A document that identifies the substantive changes that were made during the review, with page and paragraph references to the draft document that was submitted.

(a) Through attributions to OMB in the redline and strikeout version or other document identifying the changes made at OMB's recommendation. (c) Other (please describe):

(b) Other (please describe):

Mary Dominiak dominiak.mary@epa.gov 202-564-8104 

### Testing of Bisphenol A; Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM).
OPPT–2010–0812 8880-3 A J83

A ll changes made were at OMB's recommendation.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 20376 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ANDRE MCDANIELS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12

- cr
- 167

- 1

Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Defendant

- Appellant Andre McDaniels appeals the sentenc es imposed following his guilty

- plea conviction o n nine counts of tampering with a witness by corrupt persuasion

. The district court sentenced h im to 78 months of imprisonment on each count, with th ose sentences to run concurrent ly with each other but consecutive ly to federal sentences that McDaniels was already serving following prior convictions on charges of coercion and enticement

.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 3, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-20376 Document: 00512650683 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/03/2014No. 13

- 20376

McDaniels argues that the sentences imposed by the district court were substantively unreasonable because the district court did not afford adequate weight to the applicable guidelines range

– U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3 in particular

– in its balancing of the 18 U.S.C. § 355 3(a) factors

. See Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 50

- 51 (2007)

. He did not object on this basis in the district court , however, so plain error review applies. See United States v. Peltier , 505 F.3d 389, 391

- 92 (5th Cir. 2007)

. McDaniels does not at tempt to show that the alleged error either “affect ed [ his ] substantial rights ” or “seriously affect[ed] the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings,” however, so he cannot establish reversible plain error. Puckett v. United State s , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted) ; see also United States v. Williams , 620 F.3d 483, 496 (5th Cir. 2010)

. AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 13-20376 Document: 00512650683 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/03/2014