alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Hewitt Associates, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: February 7, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Russell P. Fradin
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Russell P. Fradin      
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Hewitt Associates, Inc. and will be retained by Hewitt
Associates, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission as and exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEVEN T HC IRC UIT AUG 9 , 2006 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 16227 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D. C . Do c k e tNo . 0 5 - 0 0 0 4 2 - C R - 3 - L AC U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s J A M E S E RN E S T L U C K I E , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe N orthe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( A u gu s t 9, 2006) B efo re T JO F L A T , B L A C K an d B A R K E T T , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M : E . B r ia n L a n g , ap p o in te d c o u n s e l f o rJ a m e s E rn e s t L u c k ie , h a s m o v e dto w i thd raw fr om further r epre se nt at i on of L ucki e, because, i n h i s opi ni on , the appeal2

i s w i thoutm e r i t . C ouns e l ha s f i l e d abr i e f

pur s ua ntt o A nde r s v. C a l i f orni a , 386 U . S . 73 8, 87 S . C t . 13 96 , 18 L . E d. 2d 49 3 (19 67 ). Independ entre vi ew of the ent i re r e c o r d r e v e a ls th a t c o u n s e l’s a s s e s s m e n t o f th e r e la tiv e m e r it o f

th e ap p e a l is c o rr e c t. B e c au s e in d e p e n d e n t e x a m in a tio n o f th e e n tir e r e c o r dr e v e a ls n o a r g u ab le i ssu es o f m eri t , co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , an dL u ck ie’s conv i ct i on s and se nt ence s are A FFI R M ED .
June 19,--- 2014 Memorandum Subject: Oil and Gas Advance Notice of Proposed Rule (ANPR) Making Conference Call From: Gregory Green, Director Outreach and Information Division Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS)

To: Docket- EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0151 Participants: William Wehrum, Hunton and Williams Laura Bunte, EPA, OAQPS Gregory Green, EPA, OAQPS

This memorandum to docket provides a briefsummary ofthe discussion between William Wehrum representing parties in the oil and gas industry, Laura Bunte, and myself. Mr. Wehrum had three issues ofconcern: 

### 1. Mr. Wehrum expressed a concern that the 45 day comment period may not be sufficient time to develop and submit a comprehensive set ofcomments to the ANPR and questioned whether or notthe Agency would be willing to consider extending the comment period by 15 days. He did say that ifwe objected, he would not pursue this but at some point may ask us to amend certain parts ofthe final rule where he felt the Agency may have erred. I responded that when you consider we have to evaluate the comments we received from the ANPR, develop a proposed action, and finalize that action between now and March 2, 2016, we will already have difficulty meeting the schedule required to get all ofthis done. Ifelt extending the comment period would make this task even harder

. 2. Mr. Wehrum then asked ifwe intended on addressing the prohibition in the Tribal New Source Review (NSR) rule of issuing general permits or permits by rule to synthetic minorsources as he had not seen any reference to this issue in the ANPR. I informed Mr. Wehrum that we had not addressed this issue in the ANPR since we were addressing it in the first bundle ofgeneral permits/permits by rule for minorsources on tribal lands that I expected to be promulgated in the nextfewweeks. 3. Mr. Wehrum's final question concerned the possible development ofa Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) for oil and gas sources on tribal lands. He informed us that some representatives of the industry were very concerned about a possible FIP and questioned the legality ofthis approach. Essentially he wondered ifthis alternative (the othertwo being general permits or permits by rule) was the leading contenderofthe three options we were considering. I explained to Mr

.Wehrum thatthis option came out ofa discussion with Region 8 on howto deal with areas ofextensive oil and gas developmenton tribal lands thatwere close to nonattainment. We are concerned that ifwe don't address existing sources in some manner, thatthe rapid growth of new and modified sources in these areas may cause future violations ofthe standard. We feel**th~t** a FIP may be one wayto address this issue, butatthis timethis option is only underconsideration and carries no more weightthan the othertwo options. Once we have an opportunityto evaluate the comments tothe ANPR, we will make adecision on how to proceed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



I, Patrick Freeman, Chief Executive Officer of Cordia Corporation (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the period December 31, 2003 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)

or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By: /s/ Patrick Freeman

-------------------------------

Patrick Freeman

Chief Executive Officer



March 10, 2005

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cordia Corporation and will be retained by Cordia Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
5

NOx Emissions for Bernalillo County, 2002 - 2008

AQD EXHIBIT

i

I

Source Category 2002 2005 2008 Grand Total

Highwav Vehicles 16060.9 14305.6 9315.3 39681.7

Off-Highway 3650.4 3549.0 3154.7 10354.1

Fuel Comb. Other 2457.6 2485.9 73.3 5016.8

Other Industrial Processes 1256.8 1316.7 725.4 3298.9

Fuel Comb. Elec. Uti!. 1137.2 1146.4 190.3 2474.0

Petroleum & Related Industries 152.8 154.3 19.5 326.5

Fuel Comb. Industrial 76.6 143.1 75.6 295.3

Miscellaneous 30.4 31.5 61.9

Metals Processing 41.9 7.1 10.3 59.3

Chemical & Allied Product Mfg 25.3 25.8 0.6 51.6

Solvent Utilization 24.0 24.0 48.1

Waste Disposal & Recycling 16.8 20.2 0.3 37.3

Storage & Transport 21.6 5.7 27.3

Grand Total 24930.6 23231.3 13570.9
NOx Emissions 2002 to 2008

0

5000

10000150002000025000

2002 2005 2008

Total Tons Emissions
NOx Emissions 2002 to 2008

01

10

100

1000

10000

100000

2002 2005 2008

Total Tons Emissions (logarithmic scale) 
NOx Emissions 2002 to 2008

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

2002 2005 2008

Total Tons Emissions

Grand Total

Highway Vehicles

Off-Highway

Fuel Comb. Other

Other Industrial Processes

Fuel Comb. Elec. Util.

Petroleum & Related

Industries

Fuel Comb. Industrial

Miscellaneous

Metals Processing

Chemical & Allied Product

Mfg

Solvent Utilization

Waste Disposal &

Recycling

Storage & Transport
S02 Emissions for Bernalillo County, 2002 - 2008

Source Category 2002 2005 2008 Grand Total

Highway Vehicles 468.9 387.3 103.0 959.2

Off-Highway 354.6 375.7 102.1 832.4

Fuel Comb. Industrial 320.4 332.7 9.8 662.9

Fuel Comb. Other 186.4 185.9 1.5 373.9

Fuel Comb. Elec. Uti!. 96.3 129.8 3.2 229.3

Petroleum & Related Industries 71.7 91.8 17.0 180.5

Other Industrial Processes 53.7 63.9 24.4 142.0

Chemical & Allied Product Mfg 9.1 9.1 18.2

Storage & Transport 13.3 13.3

Metals Processing 9.6 0.0 9.6

Miscellaneous 3.3 3.8 7.1

Waste Disposal & Recycling 0.6 1.5 0.1 2.2

Solvent Utilization 0.1 0.1 0.2

Grand Total 1574.9 1594.9 261.1 3430.9
SO2 Emissions 2002 to 2008

0

400800

12001600

2002 2005 2008

Total Tons Emissions
SO2 Emissions 2002 to 2008

0

10

1000

2002 2005 2008

Total Tons Emissions (logarithmic scale) 
SO2 Emissions 2002 to 2008

0

400

800

1200

1600

2002 2005 2008

Total Tons Emissions

Grand Total

Highway Vehicles

Off-Highway

Fuel Comb. Industrial

Fuel Comb. Other

Fuel Comb. Elec. Util.

Petroleum & Related

Industries

Other Industrial Processes

Chemical & Allied Product

Mfg

Storage & Transport

Metals Processing

Miscellaneous

Waste Disposal &

Recycling

Solvent Utilization
IN RE: Bart F. MCCLAIN

165P19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 8, 2019

Bart F. McClain, for McClain, Bart F.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st of May 2019 by Petitioner for Review of Emergency Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of May 2019."
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 18-14075

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 6:18-cr-00056-PGB-TBS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

THOMAS DEAN PERON, JR.,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(March 18, 2019)

Before MARCUS, MARTIN and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 18-14075 Date Filed: 03/18/2019 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Adeel Bashir, appointed counsel for Thomas Dean Peron in this direct 

criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief 

prepared under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent 

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of 

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals 

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and 

Peron’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 18-14075 Date Filed: 03/18/2019 Page: 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6782
MELVIN CORNELIOUS WILSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus B. ZOLICOFFER, Lieutenant; E. MORRIS, Sergeant; E. CLARK, Assistant War den; W. H. TUCKER, Captain; E. MOHEAD, Sergeant; J. V. BEALE, Deputy Warden; RUFUS FLEMING, Regional Director; J. M. JABE, Chief Warden; RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-549-2) Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 23, 1997 Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Melvin Cornelious Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilson v. Zolicoffer , No. CA-96-549-2 (E.D. Va. May 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GEORGE ALBERTO BELTRAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 18

- 35313

D.C. No. 3:17

- cv

- 00915

- SI

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Michael H. Simon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 19, 2019 **

Before: TROTT, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner George Alberto Beltran appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in his

action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of

Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971), alleging various constitutional vio lations . We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. W e deny Beltran’s request for oral argument, set forth in

his opening brief. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 22 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 35313

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Williams v.

Paramo , 775 F.3d 1182, 1191 (9th Cir. 2015). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Beltran

failed to properly exhaust his administrative remedies, or raise a genuine dispute of

material fact as to whether there was “something in his particular case that made

the existing and generally available administrative remedies effectively unavailable

to him.” Albino v. Baca , 747 F.3d 1162, 117 1

- 7 2 (9th Cir. 2014) (en banc); see

also Woodford v. Ngo , 548 U.S. 81, 90 (2006) (requiring proper exhaustion, which

means “using all steps that the agency holds out, and doing so properly (so that the

agency addre sses the issues on the meri ts)” (emphasis, citation, and internal

quotation marks omitted)).

T he district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Beltran’s motion for

default judgment because Beltran did not seek entry of default and defendants did

not “fail to plead or othe rwise defend.” See Eitel v. McCool , 782 F.2d 1470, 1471

(9th Cir. 1986) (setting forth standar d of review and explaining that Fed. R. Civ. P.

55 requires first the entry of a default and then entry of default judgment).

We reject as without merit Beltran’ s contentions regarding judicial bias.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on3 18

- 35313

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Robert Hughes SPRINGLE

No. 329P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 4, 2019

Amanda S. Zimmer, Assistant Appellate Defender, For Springle, Robert Hughes

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina

Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina

Scott E. Thomas, District Attorney, For the State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 28th of September 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of September 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition in the alternative filed by Defendant on the 28th of September 2018 in this matter for a writ of *352certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Carteret County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of September 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th of March 2019 by Defendant to Amend Petition for Discretionary Review and Alternative Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of September 2019."
June 26, 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

SUSAN LUCILLE WRIGHT , Appellant
NO. 14

- 10

- 01193

- CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
STATE of North Carolina v. Maechel Shawn PATTERSON

No. 597P01-6

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Maechel Shawn Patterson, For Patterson, Maechel Shawn

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, For State of N.C.

Seth H. Edwards, District Attorney, For State of N.C.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th of June 2019 by Defendant for Amended Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th of June 2019 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 19th of June 2019 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Ervin, J., recused
STATE of North Carolina v. Rashema BIVENS, Defendant.

No. COA18-800

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 6, 2019

VACATED. REMANDED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000837893
<NAME> 88AP
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         278,229
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,455
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               327,684
<PP&E>                                       4,842,700
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,285,467
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,884,917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,878,256
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,884,917
<SALES>                                        443,496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               458,263
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  471,884
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,621)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,621)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,621)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                                                                      |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ GEOFFREY S.M. HEDRICK Geoffrey S.M. Hedrick Chief Executive Officer and DirectorDecember 11, 2008 |  | 

|                                                                       |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ JOHN C. LONG John C. Long Chief Financial OfficerDecember 11, 2008 |  | 

---



QuickLinks