alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Gary Artmont, certify that;

(1)         I have reviewed this report on Form10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 of Nordic Nickel Ltd.;

(2)         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)         The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)         disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)         The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)         all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  

Date:     November 13, 2007
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, James W. Bernau, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc. on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.





Date: March 31, 2011By:
/s/ James W. BernauName:
James W. BernauTitle:
Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. and will be retained by Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. specifically incorporates it by reference.
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 03-4100



# 
A JA J. M C C LENNY ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge.

(CR-02-176) Submitted: June 10, 2003 Decided: June 19, 2003 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSELFrank W. Dunham, Jr., Federal Public Defender, Paul G. Gill, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Frances H. Pratt, Research and Writing Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Peter S. Duffey, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM: Following a bench trial, the district court found Aja J. McClennyguilty of five counts: possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute on March 27, 2002 (Count One), possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime on March 27, 2002 (Count Three), possession of marijuana with intent to distribute on March 27, 2002 (Count Four), possession of a firearm by an unlawful user of controlled substances on March 27, 2002 (Count Six), and possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute it on April 18, 2002 (CountSeven). The court sentenced McClenny to thirty-six months imprisonment for Counts One, Four, Six, and Seven, and to sixty consecutive months imprisonment for Count Three. On appeal, McClenny alleges that there was insufficient evidence to support her convictions for Counts One and Three. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, Glasser v. United States , 315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942), we find the evidence was sufficient to support McClenny’s convictions for Counts One and Three. See United States v. Lomax , 293 F.3d 701, 705 (4th Cir.) (giving test to determine whether possession of a firearm was in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)), cert. denied , 123 S. Ct. 555 (2002); United States v. Samad , 754 F.2d 1091, 1096 (4th Cir. 1984) (providing elements of possession with intent to distribute under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)). Accordingly, we affirm McClenny’s convictions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. M C C LENNY
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**SECTION 906CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HireRight, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, EricJ. Boden, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, for purposes of 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

·                  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

·                  the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August  7, 2008 | By:      | /s/  Eric J. Boden        |
|-----------------------------|----------|---------------------------|
|                        |     | Eric  J. Boden            |
| * *                    | * * | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

 

*A signed original of this written statement required by 18U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.*

 

----
No. 11-101.

#### Chapman Kelley, Petitioner v. Chicago Park District.

565 U.S. 934, 132 S. Ct. 380,

181 L. Ed. 2d 240,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6338.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of Blane De St. Croix, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 635 F.3d 290.
|                            |                                                                               |                                      |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                            |                                                                               |
|                       |                                                                          |                                 |
| May              15, 2006  | By:                                                                      | /s/ Robert              K. Moskovitz |
|                            | Robert              K. Moskovitz                                                   |
|                            | Chief                Financial Officer of the General                Partner  |
#### Nap Lovett, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed February 14, 1928.

*270
      *Pat Johnston,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Fred II. Davis,*Attorney General, and *Boy Campbell,*Assistant, for the State.

Whitfield, P. J.

On a writ of error to a judgment of conviction of manslaughter it is contended that the evidence shows the accused to be guilty of murder in the first degree or no crime whatever.

Section 6110, Rev. 'Gen. Stats., is as follows: “In all criminal prosecutions hereafter begun in this State, if the defendant be found guilty of an offense lesser in degree, but included in the offense charged in the indictment or information, such verdict shall not be set aside by the court, upon the ground that such verdict is contrary to the evidence, if the evidence produced in such case would have supported a finding, or if such court would have sustained a verdict of guilty of the greater offense.”

The above statute was enacted to change the rule announced in Johnson v. State, 24 Fla. 162, 4 So. Rep. 535. Golding v. State, 26 Fla. 530, 8 So. Rep. 311. See McCoy v. State, 40 Fla. 494, 24 So. Rep. 485.

“In the trial of one under an indictment for murder where the evidence is sufficient to support a verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree, a verdict of manslaughter will not be disturbed upon the ground that the evidence is not sufficient to support a verdict of that degree of homicide.” Williams v. State, 73 Fla. 1198, 75 So. Rep. 785.

The evidence would have sustained a verdict of a higher offense under the indictment, therefore the conviction for manslaughter is authorized.

Affirmed.

*271Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
IN RE: Charles Everette HINTON

449P11-22

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Charles E. Hinton, For Hinton, Charles Everette

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of June 2019 by Plaintiff for En Banc Ex Parte Replevin at Common-Law Action

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Ervin, J. recused
STATE of North Carolina v. Keven Anthony MORGAN

No. 35P19-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

James R. Parish, Attorney at Law, Fayetteville, Keven A. Morgan, for Morgan, Keven Anthony

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Barry H. Bloch, Assistant Attorney General, Kimberly S. Robb, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 1st of March 2019 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order *413was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 By: /s/ Roman Gregorig

Roman Gregorig
Vice President and Principal Financial Officer
of Superfund Capital Management, Inc.,
the general partner of Quadriga Superfund, L.P.
November 13, 2007
 E-3
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATE
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. 1350)





The
undersigned, Julian R. Geiger has executed this certificate in connection with
the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s report
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 2, 2009 (the
“Report”).





The
undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”);
and





2. The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 5th
day of June 2009.





/s/
      JULIAN R. GEIGERJulian
      R. GeigerChairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)





This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


29
---

Exhibit 13.1

# CERTIFICATION

# Under 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned officers of Mamma.com Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, to
such officers knowledge, that:

(1)    The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2005 of the Company (Form 20-F) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2)    The information contained in the Form 20-F
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

|Date: March 29, 2006 | By: /s/ Guy Fauré                                                 
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     | Guy FauréPresident and Chief Executive Officer                    
|Date: March 29, 2006 | By: /s/ Daniel Bertrand                                           
|                     | Daniel BertrandExecutive Vice-President andChief Financial Officer

147
STATE v. Jennifer JIMENEZ/April Myers

22P19-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2019

April Myers, for Jimenez, Jennifer.

Craig Blitzer, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd of April 2019 by Defendant for Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."
CHAMBERS v. The MOSES H. CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, et al.

147PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 18, 2019

John F. Bloss, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, For Chambers, Christopher.

Barry L. Kramer, Attorney at Law, Los Angeles, For Chambers, Christopher.

Philip J. Mohr, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, For The Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital, et al.

Brent Fancher Powell, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, For The Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital, et al.

Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For N.C. Justice Center, et al.

Carol L. Brooke, Attorney at Law, For N.C. Justice Center, et al.

Jack Holtzman, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For N.C. Justice Center, et al.

Clermont F. Ripley, Attorney at Law, For N.C. Justice Center, et al.

William R. Corbett, Attorney at Law, Baton Rouge, For N.C. Justice Center, et al.

Deborah Goldstein, Attorney at Law, For N.C. Justice Center, et al.

Narendra K. Ghosh, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, For N.C. Justice Center, et al.

Ryan Y. Park, Deputy Solicitor General, For State of North Carolina.

Daniel Wilkes, Assistant Attorney Geneal, For State of North Carolina.

Matt Burke, Solicitor General Fellow, For State of North Carolina.

Linwood Jones, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For North Carolina Healthcare Association.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 17th of July 2019 by Plaintiff:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of July 2019."

Plaintiff shall have up to and including the 8th day of August 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
## THEATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

March 14, 1961
Honorable Q. F. Steger Opinion No. WW-1017 CountyAttorney Colorado County Re: Whether property already Columbus, Texas appropriated to one public use can be taken under eminent domain laws for another public us@in the absence of a showing that the purpose of the taking can be aocompllehed in no Dear Mr. Steger: other practical manner. Youstate in your opinion request that Colorado County 1s contemplating the condemnation of alengthwise portion of railroad spur right of waylocated In anunpopulated area of the county for the purpose of building a aounty road. As weunderstand the facts the county seeks to aoqulre that portion of railroad right of wayfrom the intersectlon of the tracks andFarm-to-Market RoadNo. 950 in a aoutherly direction for almost a distance of one-half mile. Prior to the consideration of condemnation the county offered to purchase the needed right of wayfrom the railway company, which 1s not presently in use by the railroad. Sub- sequently, the companydeclined to sell stating that such segment of the railroad would be needed In the future. In,,your opinion request your conclusl$n Is that the right of way has not been abandoned

. . . andyouhave asked the folio&g question:

“Canproperty already appropriated to one public use be taken under applicable laws of eminent domain for another public use In the absence of a showing that the purpose of the taking can be accomplished in noother practical manner?” It is stated In Snellen v. Brazoria County, 224S.W.2d 305 (Civ. App., 1949, error ref. n.r.e.) that:Honorable G. F. Steger, Page 2 (ww-1017)

as ageneral rule, property appropriated to-the public purpose cannot be taken for another public use without express or lmplied legislative authority whensuch taking results in practical destruction of the prior use unless the subsequent taking is for a public purpose of greater or paramount lmportante which cannot be accomplished in anyother practical way." (Emphasis added) This rule wasoriginally stated in Sabine &E. T. Ry. Co. V. Gulf &I. Ry. Co. of Texas, 92Tex. 162, 46S.W. 784 8). There 1s noapplicable statute conferring the specific authority needed by the county to condemnthe desired portion of railroad right of way. In the absence of such authority, to sustain a subsequent taking under a general power, there mustbe a showing of paramount importance or purpose andthat the power can be exercised In noother practical way, We accordingly answer your question in the negative. SUMMARY In absence of legislative authority, property appropriated to apublic purpose cannot be taken for another public use whensuch taking will destroy or materially impair the prior use unless the subsequent taking is for aparamount public importance which cannot be accomplished In anyother practical way.

WHPjr:mm APPROVED: OPINIONCOMMITTEE W.V. Geppert, Chairman Yours very truly, WILLWILSON Attorney General of Texas

EdwardA. Cazares John C. Phillips John Leonarz Dudley McCalla REVEIWED

FORTHEATTORNEY

GENERAL BY: MorganNesbitt
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Forest Road Stormwater Discharges 

FROM: Prasad Chumble

Rural Branch

 Water Permits Division, 4203M

TO: The File

DATE: 5/26/16

EPA met with the BLM on 3/23/16, to obtain information on the BLM’s programs to reduce stormwater 

runoff from forest roads. The BLM described its programs, including its enforcement structure, and 

noted that BLM’s current programs are sufficient in addressing runoff from forest roads. BLM submitted 

the following materials: 

 BLM Info to EPA submission Transmittal Memo 6-6-16

 Environmental Management NW Draft