alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Boundless Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company does
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 (section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

The foregoing certification (i) is given to such officers' knowledge, based upon
such officers' investigation as such officers reasonably deem appropriate; and
(ii) is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 (section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.


Dated: August 31, 2005                /s/ John D. Ryan
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      John D. Ryan
                                      Acting Chief Executive Officer


Dated: August 31, 2005                /s/ Joseph Gardner
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      [GRAPHIC OMITTED]
                                      Joseph Gardner
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
  document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures
     that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
  statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Boundless Corporation
and will be retained by Boundless Corporation and furnished to the United States
          Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2


              SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report (the "Report") of TCI
Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Stephen P. DeSantis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to TCI Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by TCI Solutions, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: August 13, 2004                       By:    /s/ Stephen P. DeSantis
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Stephen P. DeSantis
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

          - 5 CFR Part 300 
          - RIN 3206-AL18 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Office of Personnel Management. 

# ACTION:

Final rule; delay of effective date and addition of comment period.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document delays the effective date by 60 days and provides a 30-day public comment period to run concurrently for the final rule eliminating the time-in-grade requirement for competitive promotions, as published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on November 7, 2008.                     

# DATES:

The effective date for the final rule published on November 7, 2008 (73 FR 66157), is delayed until May 18, 2009. Written comments must be received on or before April 8, 2009. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Janice Warren by telephone (202) 606-0960; by FAX (202) 606-2329; by TTY (202) 418-2134; or by e-mail                         *janice.warren@opm.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Office of Personnel Management published a Final Rule in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 7, 2008 (73 FR 66157). Pursuant to a January 20, 2009, White House Memorandum on regulatory review, agencies are requested to consider extending for 60 days the effective date of regulations that have been published in the                     **Federal Register**                     but not yet taken effect, for the purpose of reviewing questions of law and policy raised by those regulations. Where such an extension is made, agencies are requested to immediately reopen the notice-and-comment period for 30 days to allow interested parties to provide comments about issues of law and policy raised by those regulations. As a result, OPM has delayed the effective date of the final rule from March 9, 2008 to May 18, 2009. OPM has also opened a 30-day public comment period.                 

U.S. Office of Personnel Management. 

Kathie Ann Whipple, 

Acting Director.

[FR Doc. E9-5008 Filed 3-5-09; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 6325-39-P
No. 09-1089.

#### Allied Home Mortgage Capital Corp., et al., Petitioners v. Larry Corrales.

559 U.S. 1093, 130 S. Ct. 2384,

176 L. Ed. 2d 769,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3617.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Texas denied.
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, Harry Chew, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Bi-Optic Ventures, Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period

ended November 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and

Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the

requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange

Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and results of operations

of the Company.







Date:  January 5, 2005



/s/  Harry Chew

Harry Chew, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer











1
No. 09-7644.

#### Cirilo Mancilla-Lopez, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1093, 130 S. Ct. 2370,

176 L. Ed. 2d 770,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3643.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 333 Fed. Appx. 864.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Cruz, Appellant.

[718 NYS2d 853]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Moore, J.), rendered October 6, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted murder in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 12V2 to 25 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s mistrial motion based on testimony regarding an uncharged assault upon the victim’s friend which occurred shortly before defendant shot the victim. *360The court struck the testimony and strongly instructed the jury to disregard it, which was sufficient to eliminate any potential prejudice under the circumstances of the case, including the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt *(see, People v Santiago,*52 NY2d 865).

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.
Exhibit 32

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Regal Entertainment Group, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), each hereby
certifies that, to his/her knowledge on the date hereof:



| |  | /s/MICHAEL L. CAMPBELLMichael L. Campbell
Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2005
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/AMY E. MILESAmy E. Miles
Chief Financial Officer
August 9, 2005              

---



QuickLinks
STATE of North Carolina v. Jeffery ROBINSON

No. 349P09-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 25, 2019

Jeffrey Robinson, for Robinson, Jeffery.

Catherine F. Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 21st of June 2019 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of June 2019."

Ervin, J. recused
Dismiss and Opinion Filed March 18, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00241-CV 

IN THE ESTATE OF NORMAN SIMON BROWN, DECEASED 

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. PR-14-04275-2 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Whitehill 

Opinion by Justice Francis 

 Appellant has filed a motion stating he has elected to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id. 

150241F.P05 

 

/Molly Francis/ 

MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

IN THE ESTATE OF NORMAN SIMON 

BROWN, DECEASED 

No. 05-15-00241-CV 

 On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2, 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. PR-14-04275-2. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Francis. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Whitehill 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. 

 We ORDER that appellee Dorothy Brown recover her costs, if any, of this appeal from 

appellant Dr. Stephen Brown, DC. 

Judgment entered March 18, 2015.
#### J. F. Pearce, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed April 4, 1928.

*694
      *E. M. Johns*and *Joe Hill Williams,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Fred H. Davis,*Attorney General, and *Boy Campbell,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.-

-This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
From: Phil Hopkinson [mailto:phopkinson@hvolt.com] 

Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 10:32 AM 

To: Jerry.Corkran@CooperIndustries.com; Jerry Schoen (jerry.schoen@aksteel.com); Raymond Pcolinski 

(Raymond.pcolinski@atimetals.com); Caskey, John; Rob Greeson (rgreeson@electro-mechanical.com) 

Cc: sco_choinski@nema.org; Brian Coffey; Richard Parker 

Subject: DOE Negotiations 

Good morning Gents:

I want to bring you up to speed on the DOE Negotiations and my role or lack thereof.

1. Richard Parker is the negotiator and has named me to the negotiating team as a result of a

request by AK Steel.

2. Brian Coffey of Navigant Consulting is my director of consulting activity in support of the DOE.

3. This morning Brian called me to indicate that the DOE does not plan to pay for work by any of

the negotiators and that they will not support my work in the DOE task force.  He is actually in

the same unsupported state and will not be in the meetings either.

4. Brian Coffey pointed out that my contract with Navigant is non‐exclusive and as such is not

preventing me from representing others but I would not be representing the DOE or Navigant.

5. Future work by me for Navigant is likely to be a continuation of general technical expert and

information gatherer as requested.

6. We addressed the aspect of potential conflicts of interest and I indicated that as in every

consulting arrangement, I do my best to find the truth (like cost versus efficiency) and report the

facts without bias.  We both agreed that such activity would not be a conflict of interest.

7. I see several possible paths forward at this point:

a. Disengage from the task force.

b. Remain on the task force as a representative of another organization and attend the

meetings.

c. Remain on the task force as a representative of another organization but attend the

meetings by telephone only and not attend the meetings in person.

8. I will be glad to assist the negotiations in any useful way that you may see fit at this point and

am not trying to rattle a tin cup as I have plenty of other consulting work but thought it

important to clarify my current status.

9. I have one conflict for the first meeting as I am giving a seminar on Voltage Transients to

Hammond on September 16th in Toronto.  My plan had been to fly to Washington, DC on the

14th, attend the morning and early afternoon sessions of the taskforce on the 15th, and then fly

to Toronto on the late afternoon flight on the 15th to give my seminar.  No tickets have been

purchased.

10. I don’t know if either of you have ideas but I would like to start working on any travel plans early

enough to avoid expensive last minute flights.

Thanks for your interest,

Phil

Philip J Hopkinson, PE 

President & CEO HVOLT Inc. 

3704 High Ridge Rd. 

Charlotte, NC 28270 
phopkinson@hvolt.com

Ph 704-846-3290 

Fx 704-845-2520 

Cell 704-236-3320 

www.hvolt.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             171
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,239
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (270)
<INVENTORY>                                     12,931
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,093
<PP&E>                                          18,102
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,407)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,194
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,439
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            71
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,404
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,194
<SALES>                                         65,280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,280
<CGS>                                           48,645
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,265
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (263)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    30
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 984
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,619
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,166
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,453
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,453
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35


</TABLE>
RICH v. SLAGEL

177P19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 14, 2019

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Michael Bonfoey, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Ricky Ray Rich, for Rich, Ricky Ray (Jr.)

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th of May 2019 by Petitioner for Notice of Appeal:

*105"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of May 2019."
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, Harry Chew, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Bi-Optic Ventures, Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period

ended November 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange

Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of

Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of

the Company.







Date:  January 11, 2005



/s/  Harry Chew

Harry Chew, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



(a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Fund, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
the Report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Funds disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in the Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the period covered by the Report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in the Report any change in the Funds internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Funds most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Funds internal
control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Funds
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Funds internal control over financial reporting.
 By: /s/Christian BahaChristian BahaChief Executive OfficerNovember 13, 2006
Exhibit 10.54

 




*** Confidential portions of this document have been redacted and filed separately with the Commission.

 

Fourth Addendum to Master Services and License Agreement between

Bridgepoint Education and eCollege.com

 

This Addendum (“Addendum”) to the Master Services and License Agreement between Bridgepoint Education, Inc.  (“Customer”) and eCollege.com (“eCollege”) for the delivery of online courses, dated September 29, 2009 (the “Agreement”), is entered into effective as of the date of last signature set forth below.

 

WHEREAS, Customer and eCollege previously entered into the Agreement; and

 

WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Agreement as more specifically set forth below.

 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises, mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by the parties, the parties agree as follows:

 

1)             Services Credit.  In return for a payment of $[***] (due and payable upon the effective date of this Addendum) eCollege hereby issues Customer a services credit of $[***] for the Initial Term of the Agreement (the “Services Credit”).  The Services Credit may be used to offset technical consulting, academic services and product implementation fees (the Services Credit may not be applied to any Technology Services Fees, product use or license fees or any Gateway fees).  Any portion of the Services Credit not used during the Initial Term shall be automatically forfeited at the end of the Initial Term.  The Services Credit may be used, in whole or in part, for services activities pursuant to formal Statements of Work.

 

2)             Agreement Terms Unchanged.  No terms or conditions of the Agreement, other than the amended terms set forth in this Addendum, are changed by this Addendum.  Terms not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have entered into this Addendum effective upon the day first above written. The persons executing this Addendum for and on behalf of the parties hereto represent that they are fully authorized to do so for and on behalf of their respective principals.

 

 

	
eCollege.com
    	
 
    	
Bridgepoint   Education, Inc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:   
    	
/s/   Matt Leavy
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Thomas Ashbrook
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Matt   Leavy, President
    	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Thomas   Ashbrook
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:
    	
SVP/Chief   Information Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Date:   
    	
10/14/2010
    	
 
    	
Date:
    	
10/11/2010
    


 

1