alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17D0241. LINDSEY NELSON, JR. v. THE STATE.

In 2001, a jury found Lindsey Nelson, Jr., guilty of burglary with intent to

commit theft, burglary with intent to commit terroristic threats, and terroristic threats. 

The trial court merged the second burglary count into the first burglary count for

sentencing purposes. Nelson appealed, and we affirmed his convictions. Nelson v.

State, 277 Ga. App. 92 (625 SE2d 465) (2005). In 2016, Nelson filed a motion to

correct a void and illegal sentence, arguing that histerroristic threat conviction should

have merged with his burglary conviction. The trial court denied the motion, and

Nelson filed this application for discretionary appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

Under OCGA § 17-10-1 (f), a court may modify a sentence during the year

after its imposition or within 120 days after remittitur following a direct appeal,

whichever is later. See Frazier v. State, 302 Ga. App. 346, 348 (691 SE2d 247)

(2010). Once this statutory period expires, a trial court may modify only a void

sentence. Id. And a sentence is void if the court imposes punishment that the law

does not allow. Jones v. State, 278 Ga. 669, 670 (604 SE2d 483) (2004). “Motions

to vacate a void sentence generally are limited to claims that – even assuming the

existence and validity of the conviction for which the sentence wasimposed – the law

does not authorize that sentence, most typically because it exceeds the most severe

punishment for which the applicable penal statute provides.” Von Thomas v. State,

293 Ga. 569, 572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013).

Here, Nelson contendsthat the trial courtshould have merged his sentences for

burglary and terroristic threats. But such a merger argument is a challenge to his

convictions, not to his sentence. See Williams v. State, 287 Ga. 92 (695 SE2d 244)

January 30, 2017
(2010). Moreover, this Court has already ruled that the trial court did not err in

refusing to merge the convictions. Nelson, 277 Ga. App. at 99 (4). Because Nelson

has not raised a valid void-sentence claim, we lack jurisdiction to consider his

application for discretionary appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

01/30/2017
No. 09-7731.

#### Laurie Marie Laskey, Petitioner v. AT&T.

559 U.S. 1033, 130 S. Ct. 1945,

176 L. Ed. 2d 409,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2406.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 909, 130 S. Ct. 1292, 175 L. Ed. 2d 1083, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 993.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 479 

To replace a Coastal Barrier Resources System map relating to Coastal 

Barrier Resources System Grayton Beach Unit FL–95P in Walton County, Florida. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2005 

Mr. MILLER of Florida (for himself and Mr. BOYD) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To replace a Coastal Barrier Resources System map relating 

to Coastal Barrier Resources System Grayton Beach 

Unit FL–95P in Walton County, Florida. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF COASTAL BARRIER RE4 SOURCES SYSTEM MAP RELATING TO 

5 GRAYTON BEACH UNIT FL–95P IN WALTON 

6 COUNTY, FLORIDA. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The map described in subsection 

8 (b) relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System unit 

9 Grayton Beach Unit FL–95P, located in Walton County, 
2 

•HR 479 IH 

1 Florida, as included in the set of maps entitled ‘‘Coastal 

2 Barrier Resources System’’ referred to in section 4(a) of 

3 the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)), 

4 is hereby replaced by another map relating to that unit 

5 entitled ‘‘lll’’ and dated ‘‘llll’’. 

6 (b) REPLACED MAP DESCRIBED.—The map replaced 

7 under subsection (a) is subtitled ‘‘COASTAL BARRIER 

8 RESOURCES SYSTEM GRAYTON BEACH UNIT 

9 FL–95P DRAPER LAKE UNIT FL–96’’ and dated Oc10 tober 24, 1990. 

11 (c) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

12 shall keep the maps referred to in subsections (a) on file 

13 and available for inspection in accordance with the provi14 sions of section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act 

15 (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)). 

Æ
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5398 

To amend the Clean Air Act to exclude from the definition of renewable 

fuel any fuel that is imported or derived from any matter that is imported. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2006 

Mr. SALAZAR (for himself, Mr. GUTKNECHT, and Mr. OSBORNE) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Clean Air Act to exclude from the definition 

of renewable fuel any fuel that is imported or derived 

from any matter that is imported. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘USA Fuels Act of 

5 2006’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5398 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF IMPORTED FUEL FROM DEFINITION 

2 OF RENEWABLE FUEL. 

3 Subparagraph (C) of section 211(o)(1) of the Clean 

4 Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(o)(1)) is amended by adding at 

5 the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(iii) EXCLUSION.—The term ‘renew7 able fuel’ excludes any fuel described in 

8 clause (i) or (ii) that is imported or derived 

9 from any matter that is imported.’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6474]

# SUMMARY:

                         Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects in the exhibition: “Becoming Edvard Munch: Influence, Anxiety, and Myth,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, from on or about February 14, 2009, until on or about April 26, 2009, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: (202-453-8050)). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

Dated: December 30, 2008.

C. Miller Crouch,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-54 Filed 1-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Exhibit 32

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, John C.K. Hui,  President and Chief Executive  Officer of  Vasomedical,  Inc.
(the "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB of the  Company for the fiscal year
          ended  May  31,  2008  (the   "Report"),   fully   complies  with  the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934; and
     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: August 26, 2008

                                  /s/ John C.K. Hui
                                  ----------------------------
                                  John C.K. Hui
                                  President and Chief Executive Officer





I,  Tricia  Efstathiou,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  Vasomedical,  Inc.  (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB of the  Company for the fiscal year
          ended  May  31,  2008  (the   "Report"),   fully   complies  with  the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934; and
     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: August 26, 2008

                                   /s/ Tricia Efstathiou
                                   ------------------------------
                                   Tricia Efstathiou
                                   Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-9307.

#### Andrew Bevins, Jr., Petitioner v. Ohio.

559 U.S. 1097, 130 S. Ct. 2381,

176 L. Ed. 2d 775,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3512.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Hamilton County, denied.
#### O. L. Sanders and Samuel G. Tubell, *Appellants,*v. The City of Daytona Beach, a Municipal Corporation of Volusia County, Florida; Walter A. Richards, as City Manager; R. P. Price, as City Clerk; B. F. Brass, as Mayor-Commissioner; Harry R. Lean, R. Dennis Craig, J. D. McMillan and A. E. Donnelly, as Commissioners, and Daytona Beach Motor Lines, Inc., a Corporation Organized and Existing Under the Laws of the State of Florida, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed February 15, 1928.

*280
      *Leon J. C. Hartón,*for Appellants;

*Burwell, Thornton*and *Messrs. Wood, Newlin*and *Mc-Cardwell,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

Pursuant to authority vested in it by the Legislature of Florida, the City of Daytona Beach in November, 1927, granted a franchise to Daytona Beach Motor Lines, Inc., a Florida corporation, for the purpose of transporting *white passengers only*over certain streets of said City of Daytona Beach. The said franchise was approved by popular vote December 6, 1927. On December 12, 1927, appellants as complainants below filed their bill of complaint to enjoin compliance with the terms of said franchise. Demurrers to the bill on the part of the City of Daytona Beach and Daytona Beach Motor Lines, Inc., were sustained and the motion for temporary restraining order was denied. Appeal is taken from the order sustaining the demurrers and denying the motion for temporary restraining order.

It is contended here that the franchise brought in question is an unjust and unreasonable discrimination between the white and negro races; that it imposes unreasonable restrictions on a lawful occupation or business and that it deprives appellants of their property without due process of law.

A franchise that would have the effect of diverting the streets of a municipality from a public to a private use or *281that would, unreasonably hamper the public in the use of them would be *ultra vires*and void. 19'R. C. L. and cases cited. Careful examination of the record in this ease fails to disclose such unreasonable discrimination or restrictions as appellants contend that the franchise imposes and there is no showing whatever that it would in any way interfere with the public in the use of the streets of the City of Daytona Beach. It appears to have been authorized by the legislature and by the showing made was granted to safeguard and protect the traveling public.

The order of the chancellor is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
In the MATTER OF: A.A.J.

No. COA18-697

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 26, 2019

AFFIRMED.
DOW CONFIDENTIAL - Do not share without permission

To whom it may concern,

The User Manuals for the DJI Inspire and Phantom are too large to upload onto the 

regulations.gov website. The links for each of the manuals can be found at:

http://www.dji.com/product/inspire-1/download

http://www.dji.com/product/phantom-3/download

http://www.dji.com/product/phantom-2-vision-plus/download
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5218]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[EL07-86-008; EL07-88-008; EL07-92-008]

Notice of Filing

March 2, 2009.

Ameren Services Company and Indiana       EL07-86-008
 Public Service Company v. Midwest
 Independent System Operator, Inc.
Great Lakes Utilities. v. Midwest         EL07-88-008
 Independent System Operator, Inc.
Wabash Valley Power Association, Inc. v.  EL07-92-008
 Midwest Independent System Operator,
 Inc..
 

    Take notice that on February 23, 2009, the Midwest Independent 
System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) submitted proposed revisions to the 
Midwest ISO Open Access Transmission, Energy and Operating Reserve 
Markets Tariff, pursuant to the Commission's November 10, 2008 Order, 
Midwest Indep. Trans Sys. Operator, Inc., 125 FERC Sec.  61,161 (2008) 
(November 10 Order).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
[email protected], or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 16, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-5218 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

I, Jeffrey J. Fox,certify that:

 

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSBof Willamette Valley Vineyards, Incorporated;

 

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.       The small business issuer’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:

 

a)   Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to thesmall business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;

b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the smallbusiness issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c)   Disclosed in this report any change in thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.       The small business issuer’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)   All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  May 16, 2008 |
|-------------------------------|
| /s/ Jeffrey J.  Fox           |   |
| Jeffrey J. Fox                |
| Chief Financial Officer       |
No. 09-7542.

#### Mark Gruber, Petitioner v. Bernie Buescher, Colorado Secretary of State, et al.

559 U.S. 1088, 130 S. Ct. 2143,

176 L. Ed. 2d 760,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3150.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1153, 130 S. Ct. 1151, 175 L. Ed. 2d 982, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 688.
STATE of North Carolina v. Bennie Lee GRAHAM

No. 199P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Paul E. Smith, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, For Graham, Bennie Lee.

Scott T. Stroud, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Bennie Lee Graham, For Graham, Bennie Lee.

Ben R. David, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

*80***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd of May 2019 by Defendant for En Banc Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd of May 2019 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
**Exhibit 32.1**

**** **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| The undersigned, Long Qin, the Chief Executive Officer of Sentaida Tire Company Limited (the “Company”), DO HEREBY CERTIFY that:    |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                                           |        |
|                1.                                                                   |   |   | The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                                           |        |
|                2.                                                                   |   |   | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                                           |        |
|      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 14th day of November 2008.      |        |        |

| Date: November 14,2008 |  |  |  |
|-----------------------------|--|--|--|
| /s/ Long Qin                |  |  |  |
| Long Qin                    |  |  |  |
| Chief Executive Officer     |  |  |  |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sentaida Tire Company Limited and will be retained by Sentaida Tire Company Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.                 The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to §18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.