alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 17 (Monday, January 27, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 4342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01554]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

[Docket No. DARS-2013-0045]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Defense Acquisition Regulations System has submitted to OMB for 
clearance the following proposal for collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by February 
26, 2014.
    Title, Associated Form, and OMB Number: Defense Federal Acquisition 
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) part 244, Subcontracting Policies and 
Procedures; OMB Control Number 0704-0253.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 90
    Responses per Respondent: 1
    Annual Responses: 90
    Average Burden per Response: Approximately 16 hours
    Annual Burden Hours: 1,440
    Needs and Uses: Administrative contracting officers use this 
information in making decisions to grant, withhold, or withdraw 
purchasing system approval at the conclusion of a purchasing system 
review. Withdrawal of purchasing system approval would necessitate 
Government consent to individual subcontracts.
    Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit and not-for profit 
institutions.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Seehra at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
    Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number, and title for the Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other public submissions from members 
of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing 
on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received 
without change, including any personal identifiers or contact 
information provided. To confirm receipt of your comment(s), please 
check http://www.regulations.gov approximately two to three days after 
submission to verify posting (except allow 30 days for posting of 
comments submitted by mail).
    DoD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 4800 Mark Center Drive, 2nd Floor, East Tower, Suite 02G09, 
Alexandria, VA 22350-3100.

Manuel Quinones,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
[FR Doc. 2014-01554 Filed 1-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
GLOBAL TEXTILE ALLIANCE, INC. v. TDI WORLDWIDE, LLC, et al.

279A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 19, 2019

J. Alexander S. Barrett, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, For Global Textile Alliance, Inc.

Jon Berkelhammer, Attorney at Law, For Graven, Steven.

Steven A. Scoggan, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, For Graven, Steven.

Charles T. Hagan, III, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, For Global Textile Alliance, Inc.

Kurt A. Seeber, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, For Global Textile Alliance, Inc.

Fred B. Monroe, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For TDI Worldwide, LLC, et al.

Jennifer M. Houti, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For TDI Worldwide, LLC, et al.

Scottie F. Lee, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, For Graven, Steven.

A. Lee Hogewood, III, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Dolven Enterprises, Inc.

John R. Gardner, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Dolven Enterprises, Inc., et al.

Matthew T. Houston, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Dolven Enterprises, Inc., et al.

Shannon R. Joseph, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Graven, Garrett.

Jeffrey L. Roether, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Graven, Garrett.

Eric M. David, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Dolan, James.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th of July 2019 by Plaintiff:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th of July 2019."

*488Plaintiff shall have up to and including the 23rd day of August 2019 to file Record on Appeal and Rule 11(c) Supplement to Printed Record on Appeal.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund V, Ltd. at December 31, 1997, and its statement of
income for the year then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the Form 10-K of CNL Income Fund V, Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,361,290
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  246,153
<ALLOWANCES>                                   137,892
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      14,365,501
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,944,358
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,718,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,520,534
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,718,430
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,037,133
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  565,465
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 9,007
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,731,915
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,731,915
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,731,915
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund V, Ltd. has an
unclassified balance sheet; therefore, no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>


</TABLE>
No. 09-7947.

#### Gerald C. Bakarich, Petitioner v. New Jersey.

559 U.S. 1046, 130 S. Ct. 2086,

176 L. Ed. 2d 432,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2828.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 946, 130 S. Ct. 1518, 176 L. Ed. 2d 125, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 1353.
No. 09-9791.

#### Tiberino Mena-Hidlago, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1085, 130 S. Ct. 2138,

176 L. Ed. 2d 755,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3193.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 02364**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### 02364\02364 _Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 

### 02364\02364_Checklist.xlsx EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 02364\02364_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 02364\02364_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02364\02364_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02364\02364_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02364\02364_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02364\02364_PartH.XLS Plant submitted survey file



### 02364\Certification statement_02364.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 02364\Supporting Documentation\02364_MAP-1 James De Young ID# 02364.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 02364\Supporting Documentation\02364_MAP-2 James De Young ID# 02364.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02364\Supporting Documentation\Water Balance Diagram WB-1 ID# 02364.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

.
George Riedel Letter Agreement Amendment dated March 2, 2011



 Exhibit 10.124 

 

			
	 CONFIDENTIAL - SPECIAL HANDLING
	 	




	 

 March 2, 2011 
 Mr. George Riedel 
 1 Meadowbrook Road 

Weston, MA 02493 
 Dear George: 

I write to confirm an amendment to both your: i) Employment Agreement (“Agreement”), dated April 29, 2010, and ii) subsequent amendment to
this Agreement dated November 10, 2010. It is agreed that this amendment shall revise the Extended Termination Date (as defined in the Agreement) to be August 31, 2011. 
 Further, you understand and agree that the revised Extended Termination Date above is the only amendment made to the Agreement. If you are in accord with this amendment please sign and return one copy of
this letter to me while retaining a copy for your file. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	NORTEL NETWORKS INC.
	
	     /S/ JOHN RAY

	John Ray
	NNI Principal Officer

 ERNST & YOUNG INC 

in its capacity as Monitor of Nortel Networks Corporation et al. 
 and not in its personal capacity consents to this amendment 
  

	
	     /S/ MURRAY
MCDONALD

	Murray McDonald
	President

 Accepted this 2nd day of March, 2011 

 

	
	     /S/ GEORGE
RIEDEL

	George Riedel
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-02105 and 333-02107 on Form S-8,333-01521 and 333-01523 on Form S-3 and
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-21930-99 on Form
S-8 of MCN Corporation, doing business as MCN Energy Group Inc. (the
"Corporation"), of our reports dated February 7, 1997 (which expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the
Corporation's adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation"), appearing in and incorporated by
reference in this Annual Report of Form 10-K of the Corporation for the year
ended December 31, 1996.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Detroit, Michigan
February 28, 1997
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

55 

KA 09-02349 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, AND GORSKI, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROY E. SWAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

CYNTHIA B. BRENNAN, AUBURN, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JON E. BUDELMANN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, AUBURN (BRIAN N. BAUERSFELD OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Cayuga County Court (Mark H.

Fandrich, J.), rendered May 21, 2009. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon a nonjury verdict, of escape in the second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant previously was convicted upon his plea of

guilty of escape in the second degree (Penal Law § 205.10 [1]), based

on allegations that he escaped from a detention facility while working

as a member of a gardening crew. We affirmed the judgment of

conviction (People v Swan, 50 AD3d 1566) but, when the Court of

Appeals thereafter granted defendant’s motion for leave to appeal

(Swan, 11 NY3d 795), the People consented to vacate the judgment

provided, inter alia, that a bench trial would be conducted on

stipulated facts. In our decision in the prior appeal, we had noted

that defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that

the plea allocution was legally insufficient because defendant stated

therein “that he escaped from jail while gardening on the grounds

outside the jail and thus did not escape from ‘a detention facility’

within the meaning of the statute” (Swan, 50 AD3d at 1566), and we

further noted that defendant’s contention did not fall within the rare

case exception to the preservation doctrine (id. at 1566-1567). 

Following the bench trial, County Court found defendant guilty as

charged and, on appeal from the judgment of conviction, defendant now

contends that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the

conviction. We affirm.

According to the stipulated facts as well as testimony presented

by the People, defendant was working in an area located a few hundred

feet from the detention facility when he fled. The area was on

property owned by Cayuga County, and it was used exclusively by the

detention facility for gardening by inmates. Inmates assigned to the
-2- 55 

KA 09-02349 

gardening crew, including defendant, were escorted by and worked under

the supervision of one or more correction officers. We thus conclude

that, contrary to defendant’s contention, the area was part of the

detention facility within the meaning of Penal Law § 205.10 (1) (see

People v Blank, 87 AD2d 947; cf. People v Sharland, 130 AD2d 819).

Inasmuch as the People submitted uncontested evidence that defendant

escaped from the facility, i.e., its gardening area, on the date

specified in the indictment, the evidence is legally sufficient to

support the conviction (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490,

495).

Entered: February 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of the United States Trade Representative

# AGENCY:

Office of the United States Trade Representative. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting cancellation. 

# SUMMARY:

                        A notice was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         dated February 26, 2009, Volume 74 page 8819 and March 4,2009, Volume number 74, Notice 41, page 9438, announcing a meeting of the Industry Trade Advisory Committee on Small and Minority Business (ITAC-11), scheduled for March 9, 2009, from 9 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. The meeting was to be closed to the public from 9 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. and open to the public from 1 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. However, the meeting has been cancelled in its entirety.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Laura Hellstern, DFO for ITAC-11 at (202)482-3222, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. 

Lisa Garcia, 

Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Liaison.

 [FR Doc. E9-5025 Filed 3-5-09; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 3190-W9-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Brittany Sue Opal BRYANT

No. 118P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Anton M. Lebedev, Attorney at Law, For Bryant, Brittany Sue Opal.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Adam Everett, Assistant District Attorney, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

Davis Cooper

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General

Kristin Jo Uicker, Assistant Attorney General

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 5th of April 2019 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 5th of April 2019 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the orders of the District and Superior Courts, Wake County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of April 2019 by Defendant for Leave of Court to Consider Defendant's Reply:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of May 2019 by Defendant to Redact Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."
STATE of North Carolina v. Terance Germaine MALACHI

No. 142PA17-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Aaron Thomas Johnson, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Malachi, Terance Germaine.

John R. Green, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Constance E. Widenhouse, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Malachi, Terance Germaine.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 9th of April 2019 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 25th of March 2019 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th of April 2019 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
"' 

AUl!dWO) XOJI!M '? )IJOJQ1!8 ~1.11 
t we&lS "' 

AuedWO) XOJIIM ~ ')IJOJQ1!8 ~1.11
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 27, 2013

p0924 

# Order

Clerk September 27, 2013

147691

SC: 147691

In re HARVEY, Minors

. COA: 313746

Oakland CC Family Division:

12

- 796636

- NA

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 20, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
NUMBER 13-10-00387-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

____________________________________________________________

ALE ANDRE, LLC, FERNANDO SOLLOA, 

RICARDO BACKAL, PABLO KURI FERNANDEZ 

AND OSCAR ESQUIVEL GARZA, Appellants,

v.

SAN ANTONIO NATIONAL BANK, Appellee. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Vela, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, Ale Andre, LLC, Fernando Solloa, Ricardo Backal, Pablo Kuri

Fernandez, and Oscar Esquivel Garza, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by 

the County Court at Law No. 4 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number 
2

CL-09-3668-D(1). Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on 

grounds that the parties have reached a settlement of the claims and causes of action 

between them. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal with prejudice to 

the refiling of same. 

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the unopposed motion to 

dismiss with prejudice, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a). The unopposed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby 

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Costs will be taxed against appellants. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the 

appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants’ request, no motion for 

rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

2nd day of February, 2012.
No. 09-9151.

#### Michael A. Smith, Petitioner v. Missouri.

559 U.S. 1076, 130 S. Ct. 2109,

176 L. Ed. 2d 737,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3294.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Southern District, denied.