alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Toney, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 599]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.), rendered August 12, 1999, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige, 54*AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Bracken, Acting P. J., Santucci, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.
Print	

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ODNI News Release No. 08-24 March 12, 2024

 

#### DNI Releases FY 2025 Budget Request Figure for the National Intelligence Program

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Director of National Intelligence (DNI) is disclosing the aggregate amount of $73.4 billion in requested appropriations for the Fiscal Year 2025 National Intelligence Program (NIP).
The DNI discloses this amount consistent with section 601 of the Implementing the Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (P.L. 110-53), as amended (50 U.S.C. 3306).

Beyond the disclosure of the NIP topline figure, there will be no other disclosures of currently classified NIP budget information.  The only exceptions to the foregoing are for unclassified appropriations.

 

###
# Speeches & Interviews 2023

Joomla! - the dynamic portal engine and content management system

- Fact Sheet: Federal Executive Branch Agencies Roles and Responsibilities in United States Elections The Federal Executive Branch serves to protect U.S. elections and voters, systems, officials, and workers in various ways. Many of its responsibilities are longstanding, while some are more inspired by the recent threats of foreign election influence and interference.
- DNI Haines' As-Delivered Remarks at National Intelligence University Convocation Ceremony, 25 August 2023 &nbsp;On August 25, 2023, at the National Intelligence University (NIU) campus in Bethesda, MD, Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines delivered keynote remarks and officially installed Dr. John Ballard as the institution's fourth president and 19th executive leader. &nbsp;
- DNI Haines As-Delivered Remarks at GEOINT 2023 &nbsp;On May 24, 2023, Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines delivered keynote remarks at the GEOINT 2023 Symposium in St. Louis, MO. View the DNI’s full keynote session here, and her as-delivered remarks are below.
- "Digital Authoritarianism: A Growing Threat” at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace On April 24, Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines delivered remarks at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace on “Digital Authoritarianism: A Growing Threat.” Following the remarks, Carnegie Senior Vice President for Policy Research and Director of the Europe Program Dan Baer moderated a fireside chat with the DNI. The full event is available to view here, and the transcript is below.
- DNI Haines, Summit for Democracy 2023 On March 30, 2023, Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines delivered remarks at the Summit for Democracy 2023 ahead of a panel session titled, “Countering the Misuse of Technology and the Rise of Digital Authoritarianism.”
- A Conference on Today's Competitive Geopolitical Landscape -- In Honor of Robert Jervis On February 17, 2023, Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines delivered keynote remarks at Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs’ (SIPA) annual Gabriel Silver Lecture Dedicated to International Peace as part of “A Conference on Today’s Competitive Geopolitical Landscape — in honor of Robert Jervis.”
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
               18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED AND PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



    In connection with the quarterly report of American Achievement Corporation
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending May 25, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sherice P. Bench,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



    (1) I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American
       Achievement Corporation;



    (2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
       statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
       to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
       such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
       covered by this quarterly report;



    (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
       information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
       material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
       flows of American Achievement Corporation as of, and for, the periods
       presented in this quarterly report.



<Table>
<S>                                                    <C>  <C>
Dated: September 9, 2002                                               /s/ SHERICE P. BENCH
                                                            -----------------------------------------
                                                                         Sherice P. Bench
                                                                     CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
</Table>
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.30


Keith T. Thorndyke
5609 Hillside Ct
Edina, MN 55439



Dear Keith:

This letter amends your 9/24/01 Employment Agreement/Offer Letter which set
forth your beginning compensation levels and has been approved by the Board of
Directors. Except as expressly, set forth herein, this letter does not in any
way alter or amend the Employee Agreement signed by you on 10/01/01.

In recognition of your promotion to President and Chief Executive Officer, I am
pleased to inform you that your base salary will be increased to $250,000.00
(the "Base Amount"), effective January 28th, 2002. This base salary may be
increased or decreased from time to time by our Board of Directors, but may not
be decreased below the Base Amount. In addition, the amount of the annual bonus
which you will be eligible to receive if you satisfy your annual performance
objectives will be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors, will
not be less than 50% of your base salary in effect from time to time.

Nothing in this letter should be construed to create any contract rights to
continued employment, or to any set level of compensation. Your employment
status continues to be as an "at will" employee. Further, in addition to
permitted changes to your salary and bonus percentage as set forth above, the
number of months of severance you may receive may be increased or decreased by
Tricord from time to time in its sole discretion, but never below what is stated
in your 9/24/01 Employment Agreement/Offer.

The terms of your Offer Letter/Employment Agreement and this letter amendment
shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Minnesota, without regard to conflict of law provisions that would defer to the
laws of another jurisdiction. The rights and obligations of you and Tricord
shall be governed by and determined in accordance with such laws.



<PAGE>








We are confident that you will make a significant contribution to the success
and growth of Tricord in the coming year.

Sincerely,


/s/ Christie Skogman
Christie Skogman
Manager, Human Resources.



Acknowledged and Accepted:




/s/ Keith T. Thorndyke
----------------------------
Keith T. Thorndyke
STATE of North Carolina v. Allen JAMISON

No. 9P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Mark Montgomery, Attorney at Law, for Jamison, Allen.

Heather H. Freeman, Assistant Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

*702Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th of January 2019 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk July 24, 2012

p0716 

# Order

July 24, 2012

144878

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144878

COA: 299875

Wayne CC: 10

- 001510

- FH

DAVID HARSCHON WASHINGTON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 16, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Spice Entertainment Companies, Inc. and Subsidiaries, (formerly Graff Pay-Per-
View Inc.) on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-80824, 33-82806, and 33-93534) of our
report dated March 8, 1996 and April 3, 1996, respectively, on our audit of the 
consolidated financial statements and financial statement Schedule II of Spice 
Entertainment Companies, Inc. as of December 31, 1995, and for the year then 
ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


New York, New York
April 15, 1998
tesco1022.htm


Exhibit 10.22












SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


WHEREAS, Robert L. Kayl (“Executive”) and Tesco Corporation entered into the Employment Agreement dated August 18, 2008 and as amended on March 15, 2009 (the “Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, Section 7(i)(v) of the Agreement has an error with respect to the timing of payment and no amount is vested thereunder and the parties desire to amend Section 7(f) of the Agreement to add requirements under new guidance from the Internal Revenue Service;


 


NOW, THEREFORE in consideration of mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed that the Agreement shall be amended as follows:


 



	
1.  

	
Section 7(f) shall be amended to add the following at the end thereof:







 


“Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, to the extent any amounts payable under Sections 7(c), (d) or (e) are deferred compensation and not otherwise exempt from the requirements of Code Section 409A, no payment will be paid or commence to be paid hereunder until the date which is the 60th day after the Date of Termination.”


 



	
2.  

	
Section 7(i)(v) shall be amended so that the word “second” shall be replaced with the word “first” in each place in which it occurs.







 


This Second Amendment may be executed by portable document format (pdf) or facsimile signature which signature shall be binding on the parties hereto.


 


WHEREAS, the parties have executed this Second Amendment effective as of December 31, 2010.


 


EXECUTIVE                                                                                     TESCO CORPORATION







ROBERT L. KAYL












/s/ Robert L. Kayl                                                      By: /s/ Julio M. Quintana                                                      


Robert L. Kayl                                                                                     Julio M. Quintana


President and CEO






  





1
STATE v. Melvin Lamar FIELDS

170A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 27, 2019

Richard Croutharmel, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Fields, Melvin Lamar

Lisa Bradley, Assistant Attorney General, Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

Dear Ms. Bradley:

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 26th of August 2019 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of August 2019."

*347State of NC shall have up to and including the 16th day of October 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
Annual SRS Building 235-F Safety Status Update

by DOE to the

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

July 13, 2023 at 1:00 p.m.

Name Organization

Joyce L. Connery DNFSB—Chair

Thomas A. Summers DNFSB—Vice Chair

Jessie H. Roberson DNFSB—Board Member

Kevin Lyskowski DNFSB—General Counsel

Katherine Herrera DNFSB—Acting Executive Director of Operations

Todd Davis DNFSB—Acting Deputy Technical Director

Mark Sautman DNFSB—Associate Technical Director for Field Operations

Jonathan Plaue DNFSB—Associate Technical Director for Nuclear Facility Infrastructure and 

Projects

Dave Campbell DNFSB—Staff

Zach McCabe DNFSB—Staff

Leigh Lin DNFSB—Staff

Andrew Kline DNFSB—Staff

Eric Richardson DNFSB—Staff

Michael Dunlevy DNFSB—Staff

Patrick Migliorini DNFSB—Staff

Brenda Hawks DOE-Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Field Operations/Chief Nuclear 

Safety

Gregory Sosson DOE-Acting Associate Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Field 

Operations

Stanley Pyram DOE-SRS Site Chief Engineer

Kevin Witt DOE-Director, Office of Safety Management

Roberto Gonzalez DOE- Director, Nuclear Materials Engineering Division (SRS)

Edwin Deshong DOE-Deputy Manager, Savannah River Operations Office, (SRS)

Herbert Crapse DOE- Nuclear Material Programs Division Director (SRS)

Michael Budney DOE Manager, Savannah River Operations Office, (SRS)

Karen Morrow DOE- Director of the Remediation and Deactivation & Decommissioning 

Division (SRS)
Jimmy McMillian DOE Assistant Manager for Infrastructure & Environmental Stewardship (SRS)

Brenden Everson DOE FE/SSO (SRS)

Angela Holmes DOE-Acting Assistant Manager for Infrastructure and Environmental 

Stewardship (SRS)

Linda Luke DOE-Program Analyst, DNFSB/DOE Office of the Manager (SRS)

Patrick Kilroy DOE- Assistant Manager for Nuclear Material Stabilization (SRS)

Stephen Stamper DOE-Deputy Assistant Manager for Nuclear Materials Stabilization (SRS)

Jené Smith DOE Program Analyst, DNFSB/DOE Office of the Manager (SRS)

Karen Adams DOE-Federal Project Director (SRS)

Margaret Schwenker DOE-Office of the Departmental Representative

Phillip Polk DOE-Director Savannah River Laboratory Office

Brenda Pfrommer DOE -Program Analyst (SRS)

Brian Sautter DOE- Nuclear Engineer/Facility Engineer, Nuclear Material Engineering 

Division (SRS)

Steven Petras DOE-Office of the Departmental Representative (DR) to the Defense Nuclear 

Facilities Safety Board

Craig West DOE-SRS Site Liaison

Zahira Cruz-Perez DOE-EM DNFSB Liaison

Heidi Ascosi DOE -Contractor supporting EM-3.1/EM DNFSB Liaison

William Weaver DOE-Nuclear Facilities & Tritium Risk Specialist, CNS

David Nester DOE-Office of the Departmental Representative (DR) to the Defense Nuclear 

Facilities Safety Board
Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 14 , 2013.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00139

- CV

ILA MAE IRWIN , Appellant

V.

DOW CORNING CORPORAT ION , Appellee

On Appeal from the 157th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1992

- 25394L



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from an order signed January 29, 2013. On March 5, 2013
, appellant filed a n unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown, and Busby.
Exhibit 10.7.1  AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED 1995 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE STOCK PLAN
OF WALTER INDUSTRIES, INC.  Walter
Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereby amends the 1995 Long-Term
Incentive Stock Plan of Walter Industries, Inc. (the Plan) as follows:  1.The following is inserted as new Section 3(d) of
the Plan:  It
is the intention of the Company that the awards granted under the Plan will be
exempt from, or will comply with the requirements of, Section 409A of the
Code, and the Plan and the terms and conditions of all awards shall be
interpreted, construed and administered consistent with such intent Although
the Company intends for the awards to be in compliance with Section 409A
of the Codeor an exemption thereto,
the Company does not warrant that the terms of any award or the Companys
administration thereof will be exempt from, or will comply with the
requirements of, Section 409A of the Code. The Company shall not be liable
to any participant or any other person for any tax, interest, or penalties that
the person may incur as a result of an award or the Companys administration
thereof not satisfying any of the requirements of Section 409A of the Code
or an exemption thereto.  2.The following is inserted at the end of Section 5(c) of
the Plan:  Further,
no adjustment shall be authorized to the extent such adjustment would cause any
award that is otherwise exempt from the requirements of Section 409A of
the Code to become subject to Section 409A of the Code, or would cause any
award that is subject to Section 409A of the Code to fail to satisfy any
requirement of Section 409A of the Code.  3.The following is inserted at the end of Section 7(b) of
the Plan:  The
Committee shall not permit the modification or extension (in each case as
defined under Section 409A of the Code) of a stock option that is exempt
from the requirements of Section 409A of the Code in a manner that would
cause such stock option to become subject to the requirements of Section 409A
of the Code, or would otherwise violate any applicable requirement of Section 409A
of the Code.  4.The following is inserted at the end of Section 9
of the Plan:  Notwithstanding
the foregoing, the Committee shall not permit any deferrals under this Section 9
if such deferral would be inconsistent with the last sentence of Section 7(b) of
the Plan, or would otherwise violate any applicable requirement of Section 409A
of the Code.  1


5.The
following phrase is inserted at the beginning of Section 11 of the Plan:  Subject
to compliance with all applicable requirements of Section 409A of the
Code,  6.The following is inserted at the end of Section 13
of the Plan:  Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary, the Committee shall have the right to amend the Plan
and any outstanding awards or adopt other policies and procedures applicable to
the Plan and awards (including amendments, policies and procedures with
retroactive effect) without participant consent as may be necessary or
appropriate to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code or
an exemption thereto.  2
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Lisa Zumpano, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Countryside Review Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) 	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 6 th day of August, 2003.



| | /s/ Lisa Zumpano
Lisa Zumpano
Principal Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------
No. 11-7769.

#### Robert Keith King, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1169, 132 S. Ct. 1121,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1001,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 649.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 442 Fed. Appx. 115.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly filing of Artfest International, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, Eddie Vakser, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350), that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Dated: December 23, 2010
/s/ Eddie Vakser

Eddie Vakser

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 17

- 00055

- CR

Terrell Devonte Robinson

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 396th District Court

of Tarrant County (1451613D)

March 1, 2018

Opinio n by Justice Birdwell

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordere d that the appeal is dismissed

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Wade Birdwell

_________ _________ Justice Wade Birdwell