alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2005 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit
10-17-2005 

# B e nn v . F irs t Judic i al D i s t P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 01-3769

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2005

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2005 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du
. Re c omme nde d C it at ion

" Be nn v . F ir s t Jud ic i al Di s t " (2005). 2005 D e cisio n s . P ape r 295. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2005/295U N IT E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT
N os . 01- 3769, 01- 4012
DONAL D B E NN, A ppel l ant

v. F IR S T JU D IC IA L D IS T R IC T O F P E N N S Y L V A N IA ;

C IT Y O F P H IL A D E L P H IA ; BO AR D OF P E NS I ONS AND R E T I RE M E NT M UNI CI P AL P E N S IO N F U N D O F T H E C IT Y O F P H IL A D E L P H IA
O n A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt f o r th e E a ste rn D istric t o f P e n n sy lv a n ia ( D
. C
. N o. 98- cv- 05730) D i s t r i ctJ udge: H onor abl e Eduar do C
. R obr eno
Subm i t t ed U nderT hi r d C i r cui tL A R 34. 1( a)

Sept ember 16, 2005 B efor e: SL O V I T E R , B A R R Y and SM I T H , C i r cui tJ udges

( Fi l ed O ct ober12, 2005)


### ORDE R A MEND INGOP INI ON I T I S ORDERED that

the s l ip opi ni on i n the above c a s e , fi l e d Oc t obe r 12, 2 0 0 5 , b e am en d edas f

o llo w s: T o in sert th e w o rd“Ju d icial” b ef o re D istrict o nth e f

o llo w in g lin es: Pa ge 10, l i ne 23 Pa ge 11, l i ne 11 Pa ge 11, l i ne 142 

### B y th e C o urt,
/s / Dolores K. Slov it er Ci r c ui t Judge
Dat e d: 17 Oc t obe r

2005
IN RE: A.R.A., P.Z.A., Z.K.A.

65A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 1, 2019

Sydney J. Batch, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Christopher M. Watford, Attorney at Law, for Akers, Aaron.

Charles E. Wilson, Jr., Attorney at Law, Shelby, for Cleveland County Department of Social Services.

William L. Esser, IV, Attorney at Law, Charlotte.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of April 2019 by Respondent-Father to Stay Briefing Schedule:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of May 2019. Appellant briefs for both the Respondent-Mother and Respondent-Father shall be due 30 days from the date of this Order, and subsequent briefs shall be due in accordance with the Rules of Appellate Procedure."
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 23, 2018.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-18-01188-CV

KELVIN CALLOWAY, Appellant

V.

VONCIEL JOHNSON CALLOWAY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-18-11435

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang, Fillmore, and Schenck

Opinion by Justice Schenck

Before the Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant no longer wishes 

to pursue the appeal. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

181188F.P05

/David J. Schenck/

DAVID J. SCHENCK

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

KELVIN CALLOWAY, Appellant

No. 05-18-01188-CV V.

VONCIEL JOHNSON CALLOWAY, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-18-11435.

Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck. 

Justices Lang and Fillmore participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee VONCIEL JOHNSON CALLOWAY recover her costs of 

this appeal from appellant KELVIN CALLOWAY.

Judgment entered this 23rd day of October, 2018.
CABARRUS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE TREASURER, et al.

369PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 9, 2019

Blake W. Thomas, Deputy General Counsel, for Department of State Treasurer, et al.

Matthew W. Sawchak, Solicitor General, for Department of State Treasurer, et al.

Michael Crowell, Attorney at Law, for Cabarrus County Board of Education.

Deborah R. Stagner, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Cabarrus County Board of Education.

Elizabeth L. Troutman, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for N.C. School Boards Association.

Jill R. Wilson, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for N.C. School Boards Association.

Allison B. Schafer, Legal Counsel/Director of Policy, for N.C. School Boards Association.

Ryan Y. Park, Deputy Solicitor General, for Department of State Treasurer, et al.

Joseph A. Newsome, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Department of State Treasurer, et al.

Lindsey V. Smith, Attorney at Law, for Cabarrus County Board of Education.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief filed on the 8th of August 2019 by Respondents:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of August 2019."

Respondents shall have up to and including the 9th day of September 2019 to file and serve his/ her brief with this Court.
Exhibit 10.3



CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Tomkins plc (the Company) for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James Nicol, as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Kenneth Lever, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge;



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|/s/    JAMES NICOL                       
|                                         
|By: James Nicol Chief Executive Officer  
|                                         
|/s/    KENNETH LEVER                     
|                                         
|By: Kenneth Lever Chief Financial Officer



May 18, 2004



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except as to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE of North Carolina v. Roger Dale FRANKLIN, Jr., Defendant.

No. COA18-777

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 26, 2019

VACATED.
No. 09-9339.

#### Jose Anthony Martinez, Petitioner v. California.

559 U.S. 1078, 130 S. Ct. 2113,

176 L. Ed. 2d 740,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3408.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District, denied.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jason Lynn YOUNG

No. 124PA14-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, Paul M. Green, Attorney at Law, for Young, Jason Lynn.

Amy Kunstling Irene, Special Deputy Attorney General, Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st of December 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  1)
    
    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months
ended September 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the three months ended September 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Plumas
Bancorp.
 Date:
    November 8, 2007
    
    
    /s/ D. N. BiddleDouglas N. Biddle, Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF

I.D.G., V.A.G., E.R.G., AND R.J.G.,

CHILDREN. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 18

- 00182

- CV

Appeal from

65th District Court

of El Paso County, T exas

(TC # 2017DCM6687 )

J U D G M E N T

The Judgment of the Court issued on April 9, 2019 is withdrawn and the following is

substituted in its place.

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We therefore order that the judgment be modified by deleting the trial court’s finding

that Appellant’s parental rights should be terminated pursuant to Section 161.001(b)(1) (D) and

(K). The judgment, as modified , is affirmed

.

It has been d etermined that Appellant is indigent for purposes of appeal; therefore, this

Court makes no other order with respect to the payment of costs on appeal. This decision shall be

certified below for observance.2

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30 TH DAY OF JU LY , 2019.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Douglas D.G. Birnie, the Chief Executive Officer of Ireland
Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                        



| | By:    | /s/ Douglas D.G. Birnie               
| | ------ | --------------------------------------
| |        |                                       
| | Name:  | DOUGLAS D.G. BIRNIE                   
| |        |                                       
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer, President and
| |        | Secretary                             
| |        |                                       
| | Date:  | May 15, 2008                          
| |        |                                       





A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0203 SAT Date: 1/18/2013 Print Date: 4/1/2013

Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 2 2

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 2 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: IRR/CORROSION, LUNG, UNCERT-SENS-DERMAL/RESPIRATORY, AQUATOX-A,C
Summary of Assessment :

Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0200-09 FATE: Estimations for Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) log Kow = 5.01 (E) S = Disp. / 1.38 mg /L at 25 C (ICB / E) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) log Koc = 5.86 (E)log Fish BCF = 1.85 (E) log Fish BAF = 1.82 (E) POTW removal (%) = 75-90 via sorption and biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo Sorption to soils/sediments = strong PBT Potential: P2B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor through the skin, moderate through the GI tract, and good through the lungs based on analogs. There is concern for irritation and p ossible corrosion based on the and concern for lung effects if respirable particles are inhaled based on cationic binding to lung tissues and the surfactant properties of the PMN material. There is also uncertain concern for dermal and respiratory sensitization based on smaller . Moderate concern.

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 8.1 daphnid 48-h LC50 1.2 green algal 96-h EC50 0.68 fish

_ chronic value 0.27 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.12

algal

_ chronic value 0.26
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for ; SAR chemical class = ; liquid; log Kow = 3.66 (EPI); S = dispersible in water at 25 C (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 12

SARs iincludes molecular weight adjustment SAR Class Ecotox CategoryEcotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: Becky Jones
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

 Federal Maritime Commission. 

# Time and Date:

 March 11, 2009-10 a.m. 

# Place:

 800 North Capitol Street, NW., First Floor Hearing Room, Washington, DC. 

# Status:

 A portion of the meeting will be in Open Session and the remainder of the meeting will be in Closed Session. 

# Matters To Be Considered:

## Open Session 

1. Docket No. 02-15 Passenger Vessel Financial Responsibility—Request of Commissioner Brennan. 

                    2. Anderson International Transport and Owen Anderson,                     *et al.*                    —Order of Investigation and Hearing—Request for Extension of Time.                 

3. FY 2008 Federal Human Capital Survey Results—Interpretation of Results & Trends Closed Session. 

4. Internal Administrative Practices and Personnel Matters. 

# Contact Person for More Information:

 Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, (202) 523-5725. 

Karen V. Gregory, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-4949 Filed 3-4-09; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 137 (Wednesday, July 17, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 42807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17110]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES

SES Performance Review Board

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Arts.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the names of members of the 
Performance Review Board for the National Endowment for the Arts. This 
notice supersedes all previous notices of the PRB membership of the 
Agency.

DATES: Upon publication.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Craig McCord Sr., Director of Human 
Resources, National Endowment for the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue 
NW., Room 223, Washington, DC 20506, (202) 682-5473.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See 4314 (c)(1) through (5) of Title 5, 
U.S.C., requires each agency to establish, in accordance with 
regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or 
more SES Performance Review Boards. The Board shall review and evaluate 
the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the 
supervisor, along with any response by the senior executive, and make 
recommendations to the appointing authority relative to the performance 
of the senior executive.
    The following persons have been selected to serve on the 
Performance Review Board of the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA):

Winona Varnon--Deputy Chairman for Management and Budget
Sunil Iyengar--Director, Research & Analysis
William O'Brien--Senior Advisor for Program Innovation

Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2013-17110 Filed 7-16-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Exhibit 10.44

 

Staples, Inc.

Senior Executive Long Term Disability
 Supplemental Coverage Reimbursement Policy

 

Coverages under the Company’s Group Long Term Disability (LTD) Plan which only covers base salary and Supplemental LTD Plan which covers any excess base salary and bonus are fully paid for by our associates.   With one limited exception for senior executives earning an annual base salary in excess of $400,000 (“Named Executive Officers ”),  the Company annually reimburses through bonuses (on a grossed up basis) the Named Executive Officers  for their premiums related to any supplemental LTD coverage due to base salary, and the Company expects such annual aggregate bonuses to be approximately $50,000.
No. 11-7924.

#### Percy Jordan, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1173, 132 S. Ct. 1131,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1007,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 678.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

*1008Same case below, 18 A.3d 703.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6168

JOHN JOSEPH ZINKAND , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. CARLOS HERNANDEZ, Supt. of Avery Mitchell Correctional Institution, et al. , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville

. Frank D. Whitney , Chief District Judge. ( 1:17

- cv - 00279

- FDW )

Submitted : August 23, 2018 Decided: August 28, 2018

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. John Joseph Zinkand , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: John Joseph Zinkand s eeks to app eal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealabi lity will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists wo uld find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural gro unds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record an d conclude that Zinkand has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny Zinkand’s motion for appointment of counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contenti ons are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED