alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32 .1





Certification
Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Imagenetix, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certifies that:





To my
knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
March 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      June 18, 2010
              /s/WILLIAM P. SPENCERWilliam
      P. SpencerChief
      Executive Officer and
                President


EX-3
CHAPPELL v. NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

51PA19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 30, 2019

James M. Stanley, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, for NC Department Of Transportation.

Alexandra M. Hightower, Assistant Attorney General, for NC Department Of Transportation.

William A. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, for NC Department Of Transportation.

Jacob H. Wellman, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for NC Department Of Transportation.

Matthew W. Skidmore, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for NC Department Of Transportation.

Steven M. Sartorio, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for NC Department Of Transportation.

William H. Moss, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for NC Department Of Transportation.

Garris Neil Yarborough, Attorney at Law, Fayetteville, for Chappell, Ted P., et al.

H. Addison Winters, Attorney at Law, Fayetteville, for Chappell, Ted P., et al.

T. Paul Hendrick, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for Chappell, Ted P., et al.

Matthew H. Bryant, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for Chappell, Ted P., et al.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 29th of July 2019 by Plaintiffs:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of July 2019."

Plaintiffs shall have up to and including the 13th day of September 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5153 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5153

 To revise the number of associate judges of the Superior Court of the 
                         District of Columbia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2006

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To revise the number of associate judges of the Superior Court of the 
                         District of Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPOSITION OF SUPERIOR COURT.

    Section 11--903, District of Columbia Official Code, is amended by 
striking ``fifty-eight'' and inserting ``61''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jean Caillet, Chief Executive Officer, of the Registrant, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form
10-KSB of BBJ Environmental Technologies, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The Registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure control and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entitles, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and



c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. The Registrants other certifying officers and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation
of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal controls; and



6. The Registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: April 14, 2004 |  | /s/    JEAN
CAILLET                  
|                     |  | Jean Caillet, Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 3, 2009

0331 

# Order

April 3, 2009

136336

BRIAN POTTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 136336 COA: 262529 Washtenaw CC: 03-001226-NH KRISTYN H. MURRY, M.D. and HURON VALLEY RADIOLOGY, P.C., Defendants-Appellees,

and

ST. JOSEPH MERCY HOSPITALANN ARBOR, d/b/a TRINITY HEALTHMICHIGAN, RICHARD C. McLEARY, M.D., GARY AUGUSTYN, M.D., ROBERT DOMEIER, D.O., and EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP, P.C., Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, oral argument having been heard on March 4, 2009, the parties are DIRECTED to submit supplemental briefs addressing the issue whether, if a defendant professional corporat ion is not an entity to whom notice is required to be provided under MCL 600.2912b, the applicab le statute of limitatio ns, MCL 600.5805(6), was nonetheless subject to statutory tolli ng provided in former MCL 600.5856(d). Plaintiff’s supplemental brief is due April 17, 2009. The defense brie f is due April 24,
2009.
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with Amendment  No.1 to the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB (the
"Report") of XRG, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, each
of the undersigned  Kevin Brennan,  the Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,
and  Stephen  Couture,  the  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that,  to the  best of the  undersigneds'
knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  September 1, 2004                   /s/ Kevin Brennan
                                            -----------------------------
                                                Kevin Brennan
                                                Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  September 1, 2004                  /s/ Stephen Couture
                                           -----------------------------
                                                Stephen Couture
                                                Chief Financial Officer
IIB 

Calendar No. 494 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5245 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 7, 2006 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 22, 2006 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1 Marble Street in Fair Haven, Vermont, 

as the ‘‘Matthew Lyon Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MATTHEW LYON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 1 Marble Street in Fair Haven, 

6 Vermont, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Matthew 

7 Lyon Post Office Building’’. 
2 

•HR 5245 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Matthew Lyon Post 

5 Office Building’’. 

Calendar No. 494 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5245 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postfice Building’’. Haven, Vermont, as the ‘‘Matthew Lyon Post Of- al Service located at 1 Marble Street in Fair 

JUNE 22, 2006 

Reported without amendment
1

Farm Ranch and Rural 

Communities Committee Meeting

Agriculture Producing Solutions

March 29, 2011

Patricia Birkholz, Director

Office of the Great Lakes
2
3

Michigan’s Challenges:

Divided Legislature

Skeptical Public

User Groups Not Aligned

Farmers, Manufacturers, Small 

Business, Aggregates, Fishing 

Folk, Food Processers, Cement 

Manufacturing....
4

Process:

Great Lakes Compact requires

Water Withdrawal Laws

Ideally adopt both Great Lakes 

Compact and Water 

Withdrawal Laws together
5

Water Legislation 2008: 

Agriculture’s Role

Compact in law - Diversion’s prohibited

 Off to Congress.

 Water content of products is not a diversion.

 Provisions to protect role of Michigan Legislature.

Riparian doctrine upheld.

Water Use Assessment Tool

 Evaluation period.

 Science-based.

Seasonal use provisions.

No fees, no new rules.

Existing uses grandfathered.

Role for MDA, GAAMPs, Ag Commission.

Additional reporting time.

Water resources Advisory Council.

Allowance for transferring grandfathered uses.
6
7

Groundwater Water Advisory 

Council Established in Law

Appointments by:

Governor

Majority Leader

Speaker of the House
8

Strict Timelines

Reports to Senate Standing 

Committee (regularly)

Coordinate with House 

Standing Committee
9

Adverse Resource Impact

Determining Impact For New & Expanding Uses

GO

GO w/local education

Site review and conservation

Site review & prevention?

Lawsuit?
10

Stream

types

*Appeals 

process to NRC
11

COLD

TRANSITIONAL

COOL

WARM

X

STREAM

SMALL

RIVER

LARGE 

RIVER

Fast 

Forward
12

Renewable Economic 

Development in a KnowledgeBased Economy:

Includes Science-Based 

Decision-Making
13
14

Process Worked

Ongoing Challenges

Cost

Updates

Continued Support

Saboteurs
15

What’s Next...

 October 1, 2008

–Tool available for evaluation.

–Water accounting begins.

 February 1, 2009

–Water accounting resets.

–New adverse resource impact definition.

 July 2009

–Online registration and assessment tool 

implemented.
16

Thank you

Patricia Birkholz

DIRECTOR

OFFICE OF THE GREAT LAKES

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

525 West Allegan Phone: 517-335-4056

P.O. Box 30473 Fax: 517-335-4053

Lansing, Michigan 48909-7973 E-MAIL: birkholzp@michigan.gov

www.michigan.gov/deqgreatlakes
CHARLESTON.

#### David Simmons *et al.*v. Liberty Coal Company.

Submitted January 16, 1923.

Decided January 30, 1923.

Former Case Controlling.

This case is governed by the principles of law announced in an opinion this day handed down in the case of David Simmons and William S. Simmons vs. Joshua H. Yoho and others. (McGinnis, Judge, absent).

Error to Circuit Court, Marshall County.

Action by David Simmons and others against the Liberty Coal Company. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant brings error.

*Reversed and Judgment for Defendant.*

*Wattman E. Conaway*and *Walter A. McGlumphy,*for plaintiff in error.

J. *W. Mclntire, D. B. Evans,*and *McCamie & Clarice,*for •defendants in error.

MeRedith, Judge:

This is an action of ejectment for the recovery of the . Pittsburgh coal and mining rights under 132 acres. 155.4 poles of land in Marshall County, formerly known as the *2John Simmons farm. The ease was tried by the court in lieu of a jury and resulted -in a finding and judgment for the plaintiffs. Defendant seeks reversal.

. The coal in controversy underlies the same tract of land that is involved in the action of ejectment brought by the same plaintiffs against Joshua Yoho and others, now pending in this court. The statements of fact in the opinion this day handed down in that case apply equally here, and it is unnecessary to restate them. After M. A. Walton acquired the fee in the lands, by special commissioner’s deed, he conveyed all the coal and certain mining rights under the land to Josiah V. Thompson, by deed dated December 16, 1901. Thompson conveyed the Pittsburgh coal and certain mining rights under the land to the defendant September 5, 1914. With this slight exception here noted, the records in the two cases are the same. The points of law raised are identical. The only real question involved is whether the decree of sale entered in the former chancery cause of Julia Ann Simmons v. D. A. Simmons and others is void or merely erroneous,- or if void, whether the defendants in that suit, how the plaintiffs here, waived all errors, and are estopped from questioning the validity of that decree. In the other case we held that the decree is not void, and even if it were, by dismissing that case agreed when it was pending here on appeal, they released all error, and are now estopped.

For reasons assigned in the opinion in that case the judgment was reversed, the finding of the court set ■ aside, and judgment entered for the defendants. This case is controlled by the same principles, and will take the same course.

*Reversed and Judgment for Defendant.*
GLOBAL TEXTILE ALLIANCE, INC. v. TDI WORLDWIDE, LLC, et al.

279A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2019

J. Alexander S. Barrett, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Global Textile Alliance, Inc.

Jon Berkelhammer, Attorney at Law, for Graven, Steven.

Steven A. Scoggan, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Graven, Steven.

Charles T. Hagan, III, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Global Textile Alliance, Inc.

Kurt A. Seeber, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for Global Textile Alliance, Inc.

Fred B. Monroe, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for TDI Worldwide, LLC, et al.

Jennifer M. Houti, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for TDI Worldwide, LLC, et al.

Scottie Forbes Lee, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Graven, Steven.

A. Lee Hogewood, III, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Dolven Enterprises, Inc., et al.

John R. Gardner, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Dolven Enterprises, Inc., et al.

Matthew T. Houston, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Dolven Enterprises, Inc., et al.

Shannon R. Joseph, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Graven, Garrett.

Jeffrey L. Roether, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Graven, Garrett.

Eric M. David, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Dolan, James.

Stanley E. Woodward, Jr., Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for Global Textile Alliance, Inc.

Shepard D. O'Connell, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Dolan, James.

*97The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of August 2019 by Defendants for Extension of Time to Respond to Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of August 2019."

Defendants shall have up to and including the 16th of September 2019 to Respond to Petition for Writ of Certiorari.
GLOBAL TEXTILE ALLIANCE, INC. v. TDI WORLDWIDE, LLC, et al.

279A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 7, 2019

J. Alexander S. Barrett, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Global Textile Alliance, Inc.

Jon Berkelhammer, Attorney at Law, for Graven, Steven.

Steven A. Scoggan, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Graven, Steven.

Charles T. Hagan, III, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Global Textile Alliance, Inc.

Kurt A. Seeber, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for Global Textile Alliance, Inc.

Fred B. Monroe, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for TDI Worldwide, LLC, et al.

Jennifer M. Houti, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for TDI Worldwide, LLC, et al.

Scottie Lee, Greensboro, for Graven, Steven.

A. Lee Hogewood, III, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Dolven Enterprises, Inc., et al.

John R. Gardner, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Dolven Enterprises, Inc., et al.

Matthew T. Houston, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Dolven Enterprises, Inc., et al.

Shannon R. Joseph, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Graven, Garrett.

Jeffrey L. Roether, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Graven, Garrett.

Eric M. David, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Dolan, James.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th of August 2019 by Plaintiff to admit Stanley E. Woodward, Jr. Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of August 2019."
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-20653 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. SALVADOR FERNANDO MOLINA GARCIA Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-371-2
Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Salvador Fernando Molina Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Molina Garcia has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Molina Garcia’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave towithdrawis GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 25, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 06-20653

2 herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Molina Garcia’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date:   October 16, 2006
    /s/ Pamela G. BoonePamela G. BooneExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
CHAVEZ, et al. v. CARMICHAEL

437PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 31, 2019

Sean F. Perrin, Attorney at Law, for Carmichael, Irwin.

Sejal Zota, W. Rob Heroy, Attorneys at Law, for Chavez, Carlos, et al.

Erez Reuveni, Joshua S. Press, Gill P. Beck, Attorneys at Law, for United States.

Deborah Weissman, Attorney at Law, for Law Scholars and National Immigrant Justice Center.

Raul A. Pinto, Attorney at Law, for North Carolina Justice Center.

Irena Como, Attorney at Law, for ACLU, et al.

R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th of May 2019 by North Carolina Justice Center for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 31st of May 2019."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).