alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CABARRUS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES TEACHERS' & STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, et al.

371PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 28, 2019

Blake W. Thomas, Deputy General Counsel, Matthew W. Sawchak, Solicitor General, Ryan Y. Park, Deputy Solicitor General, Joseph A. Newsome, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Board of Trustees Teachers and State Employees' Retirement System, et al.

Michael Crowell, Attorney at Law, Deborah R. Stagner, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Lindsey V. Smith, Attorney at Law, for Cabarrus County Board of Education.

Elizabeth L. Troutman, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Allison B. Schafer, Legal Counsel/Director of Policy, Jill R. Wilson, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for N.C. School Boards Association.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 28th of June 2019 by Petitioner:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of June 2019."

Petitioner shall have up to and including the 7th day of August 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
# C_2017284EN.01000101.xml

| 29.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8564 — Viacom International Media Networks Italia/De Agostini Editore/DeA Broadcast JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 284/01)

On 22 August 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8564. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8564. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00352

- CR

Didier Saho

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From County Criminal Court No. 6

o f Tarrant County (1236650 )

May 28, 2015

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

(p)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRI CT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot

______________ Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
Martin, Michael (OST) 

Subject: FW: EAS MGZ 

.^ Oo-csv~ ofcc^'^St^aa 

From: Arnaldo Deleo rmailto:ADeleo@prpa.qobierno.pr1 

Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 10:38 AM 

To: EAS (OST) ^--• 

Cc: andrew.bonney(gicapeair.com : •^, 

Subject: EAS MGZ ^^ „v-.c 

February 16, 2011 Qjz:^rn 

To Whom It May Concern: — ^O O 

hr; ; ^ ~n 

RECOMMENDATION FOR CAPE AIR TO CONTINUE SERVICE AT THE EUGENIO MARIA DE HOSTOS AIRPORT IN 

MAYAGUEZ, PUERTO RICO 

Dear Sir. 

Tlie Puerto Rico Ports Authority (PRPA) is a public corporation and a component unit of the government of Puerto Rico, 

responsible for the maintenance, operation, development and improvement of the island aviation and maritime 

transportation facilities, including the Eugenio Marias de Hostos airport in Mayaguez, and the Luis Munoz Marin 

International Airport. 

With this letter we are request that the department of Transportation grants Cape Air the essential air service contract at 

the Eugenio Maria de Hostos due to the following reasons. Since May 1, 2005 Cape air is offering schedule air 

transportation of persons, property and mail with four daily non stops flights between Mayaguez and San Juan. 

It is essential that this services between Mayaguez and San Juan continues because the Puerto Rico capital, San Juan, 

is the island main aviation center, As a hub for domestic and international operations, it provides a link to many cities, the 

mainland US and through the Caribbean, Latin American, Europe and the World. Mayaguez is located in the west coast 

within 98 miles from San Juan. There is no other airline or company that renders that service neither from the nearest 

airport. The Rafael Hernandez Airport in Aguadilla, who offer few non stops flights to the mainland but only dunng night 

time. 

We appreciate your consideration and approval to this request. If further information is required, do not hesitate to contact 

us at (787) 791-4835 or (787) 791-1010. Thank you in advance your support and attention to this matter. 

Sincerely, 

Arnaldo Deleo 

General Manager Luis Munoz Marin International 

and Regional Airports
STATE EX REL. UTILITIES COMMISSION v. ATTORNEY GENERAL

271A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 15, 2019

Margaret A. Force, Assistant Attorney General, For Stein, Josh (Attorney General)

Kiran H. Mehta, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, For Duke Energy Progress, LLC

Christopher G. Browning, Jr., Raleigh, Attorney at Law, For Duke Energy Progress, LLC

Matthew W. Sawchak, Raleigh, Solicitor General, For Stein, Josh (Attorney General)

Molly Leigh McIntosh, Attorney at Law, For Duke Energy Progress, LLC

Jennifer T. Harrod, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, For Stein, Josh (Attorney General)

Teresa L. Townsend, Assistant Attorney General, For Stein, Josh (Attorney General)

James W. Doggett, Deputy Solicitor General, For Stein, Josh (Attorney General)

Matthew D. Quinn, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, For Sierra Club

David T. Drooz, Staff Attorney, For Public Staff - N.C. Utilities Commission

Lucy E. Edmondson, Raleigh, Staff Attorney, For Public Staff - N.C. Utilities Commission

James P. West, Attorney at Law, For Fayetteville Public Works Commission

Kyle J. Smith, Attorney at Law, For Department of Defense/Federal Executive Agencies *257The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th of April 2019 to admit Dorothy E. Jaffe Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of April 2019."
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23-1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-02105 and 333-02107 on Form S-8; 333-47139, and 333-45281 on Form S-3 and
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-21930-99 on Form
S-8 of MCN Energy Group Inc., of our report dated March 13, 2001, appearing in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MCN Energy Group Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2000.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Detroit, Michigan
March 13, 2001
EXHIBIT
      32.3




Written
      Statement of Principal Accounting Officer Furnished Pursuant to


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


as
      Adopted by


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of HouseRaising, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christine M.
      Carriker, Secretary/ Treasurer, SVP and Chief Administrative Officer, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition as of September 30, 2007 and results of operations
      for
      the quarter ended September 30, 2007 of the Company and its
      subsidiaries.






/s/
                Christine M. CarrikerChristine
                M. CarrikerSecretary/Treasurer,
                SVP and Chief Administrative Officer(Principal
                Accounting Officer)





November
      14, 2007





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Terry L. BROWN v. WENDOVER PLAZA LLC, Delhaize America LLC

No. 53P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Terry L. Brown, for Brown, Terry L.

Julie L. Bell, Attorney at Law, Winston Salem, for Wendover Plaza LLC, et al.

***ORDER***

*719Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 8th of February 2019 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th of February 2019 by Plaintiff to Amend Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of February 2019 by Plaintiff to Deny Motion to Dismiss:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of February 2019 by Plaintiff to Compel:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**
**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
**FOR THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
     I, John M. Hughes, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alion Scienceand Technology Corporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     b) [Reserved]
     c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
     d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   Date: May 17, 2004      By: /s/ John M. Hughes   Name: John M. Hughes Title: Chief Financial Officer
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2012-0601

Docket Number

2008-SW-033-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., Alert Service Bulletin No. 205-07-94, Revision A, 

dated December 8, 2008

Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., Alert Service Bulletin No. 205B-08-50, dated 

December 8, 2008

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2014

- 0159 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2014

-NE

- 01

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into an d then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:** Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

co st (@$8 5 /h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet

1.0 $ 85.00 $682 $ 767.00 

### 180 $138,060.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0. 00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in co mpliance: 

### 0 Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $138,060 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $
**On**
**- Conditio**  **n Costs:** Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexib ility Act:**  Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :
<PAGE>   1
                         PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION





                                   FORM 10-KSB




                                EXHIBIT NO. 3.3.2






          CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                 OF THE COMPANY


                                      EX-7
<PAGE>   2
                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                         CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF
                         PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION


        Patriot Scientific Corporation, a corporation duly organized and
existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Corporation"), does hereby certify that:

The amendment to the Corporation's Certificate of Incorporation set forth below
was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 and has been
consented to in writing by the stockholders, in accordance with Section 228 of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

The first paragraph of the FIFTH Article of the Certificate of Incorporation of
the Corporation be amended to read as follows:


FIFTH. The aggregate number of shares of capital stock of all classes which the
Corporation shall have authority to issue is SIXTY-FIVE MILLION (65,000,000),
having a par value of $.00001 per share, of which SIXTY MILLION (60,000,000)
shall be designated Common Stock (the "Common Stock" or "Common Shares"), and
FIVE MILLION (5,000,000) shall be designated Preferred Stock, par value $.00001
per share (the "Preferred Stock"). The Preferred Stock may be issued from time
to time in one or more series. All shares shall be issued for such consideration
or considerations as the Board of Directors of the Corporation may from time to
time determine. All rights, preferences, voting powers, relative, participating,
optional or other special rights and privileges, and qualifications, limitations
or restrictions of the Preferred Stock shall be fixed by the Board of Directors
of the Corporation. The rights, preferences, voting powers, relative,
participating, optional or other special rights and privileges, and
qualifications, limitations or restrictions of the Common Stock shall be
expressly made subject and subordinate to those that may be fixed with respect
to any shares of the Preferred Stock and shall be as follows:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Patriot Scientific Corporation has caused this Certificate
to be executed by Michael A. Carenzo, its authorized officer, on this 24th day
of June, 1997.





/s/ MICHAEL A. CARENZO
Michael A. Carenzo, Chief Executive Officer


                                      EX-8
Eric Scott HUX, Plaintiff, v. Bethany Teresa WILSON, Defendant, v. Tracy Hux and wife, Bella Hux, Intervenors.

No. COA18-1188

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 16, 2019

AFFIRMED. REMANDED.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

TODD J AMES ALCHIN, LORI ANN ALCHIN, HENRY J. FIORILLO, DARLENE J. HORSFIELD, RICHARD W. KEEFE, and

CAROLANN SHARKEY
, Appellant s ,

v.

EL MAR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC
, a Florida not

- for

- profit corporation, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 1587

[ March 17, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Jeffrey R. Levenson , Judge; L.T. Case No.

062020CA016729AXXXCE

.

Joshua I. Gornitsky of Sea rles, Sheppard & Gornitsky, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Gerard S. Collins and Jay S. Levin of Kaye Bender Rembaum, P.L., Pompano Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C ONNER

, C.J., G ERBER and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**CH** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0 509 CITY OF KALISPELL,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. MICHELLE SQUIER RAVE ,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including April 20 , 202 3 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the State’s response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 14 2023

03/14/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0509
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5179 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5179

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure adequate 
payment amounts for drugs and biologicals under part B of the Medicare 
                                Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2006

   Mr. Hall introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure adequate 
payment amounts for drugs and biologicals under part B of the Medicare 
                                Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVISION OF PAYMENT METHODOLOGY FOR DRUGS AND BIOLOGICALS 
              UNDER MEDICARE PART B.

    (a) Floor of Widely Available Market Price.--Subsection (b) of 
section 1847A of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-3a) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``paragraph (6) and'' 
        after ``Subject to''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(6) Floor of widely available market price.--The 
        Secretary shall increase the payment amount determined under 
        this subsection for a drug or biological to the extent 
        necessary to ensure that such payment amount is in no case less 
        than the widely available market price for the drug or 
        biological (as determined under subsection (d) or by the 
        Secretary).''.
    (b) Treatment of Prompt Pay Discounts.--Subsection (c)(3) of such 
section is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by inserting ``furnished to 
        physicians'' after ``prompt pay discounts''; and
            (2) in the second sentence, by inserting ``(other than 
        prompt pay discounts)'' after ``other price concessions''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to drugs and biologicals that are furnished on or after January 
1, 2007.
                                 <all>
```