alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.4



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
               18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED AND PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



    In connection with the quarterly report of American Achievement Corporation
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending May 25, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sherice P. Bench,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



    (1) The Report fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act 1934; and



    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of American
       Achievement Corporation.



<Table>
<S>                                                    <C>  <C>
Dated: September 9, 2002                                               /s/ SHERICE P. BENCH
                                                            -----------------------------------------
                                                                         Sherice P. Bench
                                                                     CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
</Table>
a6631679ex10_9.htm


Exhibit 10.9












SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION FOR


THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF


RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST

















 


The following table sets forth the compensation program for non-employee Trustees








	
Annual cash retainer (paid quarterly):

	 	$	(1	)
	
Additional cash retainer:

	 	 	 	 
	
Chairman

	 	$	100,000	 
	
Audit Committee chair

	 	 	7,500	 
	
Compensation Committee chair

	 	 	5,000	 
	
Nominating and Governance Committee chair

	 	 	5,000	 
	
Executive Committee chair

	 	 	2,500	 
	
Executive Committee members

	 	 	—	 
	
Annual equity retainer (shares of restricted stock)(2)

	 	 	2,000	 





 




	
  

	
__________











	
(1)  

	
The annual cash retainer is equal to $80,000 less the grant date fair value of the restricted stock granted in the applicable year.



















	
(2)

	
Grants are made under the Trust’s 2008 Restricted Share Plan for Non-Employee Trustees.  The shares of restricted stock vest over three years.  The grant is made on June 30th or, if not a business day, the business day prior to June 30th.







 


The Trust also reimburses all Trustees for all expenses incurred in connection with attending any meetings or performing their duties as Trustees.
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a/15d OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





I, Jun Ma, certify that:





1.
 I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Vaso Corporation and
subsidiaries (the “registrant”);





2.
 Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report.








/s/ Jun
Ma.


Jun
Ma


President and Chief
Executive Officer


Dated:
May 12, 2020
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 2 4

- 0 203

_________________ JOEY ZAHARA ,

Plaintiff and Appellant , v. ADVANCED NEUROLOGY SPECIALISTS ,

Defendant and Appellee. O R D E R

_________________ The parties jointly mo ve this Court to stay the briefing deadlines in this matter, as they have reached a settlement agreement and need time to effectuate the agreement. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that motion to stay is GRANTED. The parties have until November 1 8 , 2024, to file either a stipulation for dismissal or a report on the status of the appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 24 2024

09/24/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0203
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Jeffrey J. Fox,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Willamette ValleyVineyards Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended December 31,2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such 10-Kfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc.

 
| Date:  | May 16, 2008       |
|--------|-------------------------|
| By:    | /s/ Jeffrey J. Fox      |   |
| Name:  | Jeffrey J. Fox          |
| Title: | Chief Financial Officer |
|        |                         |  |  |  |
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CHRISTOPHER EMBREE

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3010

[ January 18, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.

Lucie County ; Gary L. Sweet, Judge ; L.T. Case No. 14CF000151A

.

Jonathan J. Kirschner of Jonathan Jay Kirschner, Esq. & Associates,

LLC, Fort Pierce, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., C IKLIN and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-4206

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * District of Minnesota. 

William James Hayes, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: January 21, 1999

 Filed: January 28, 1999

___________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. 

___________

PER CURIAM.

William James Hayes pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute and to possess

with intent to distribute crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846.

On appeal, counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

suggesting that the district court erred in overruling Hayes&s objection to the inclusion

in his criminal history score of a prior conviction for automobile theft for which Hayes

had received 30 days “confinement,” as there was no indication he was represented by

counsel in that prior proceeding. We granted Hayes permission to file a pro se

supplemental brief, but he has not done so.
The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District 1

of Minnesota. 

-2-

Hayes&s recommended Guidelines sentencing range was 77-96 months

imprisonment. At sentencing, the district court granted the government&s downward- 1

departure motion under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. § 5K1.1, p.s. (1998), and

18 U.S.C. § 3553(e), and sentenced Hayes to 48 months imprisonment and 4 years

supervised release. Because Hayes&s sentence represents a downward departure from

the Guidelines sentencing range that would have resulted if he had prevailed on his

criminal-history-score objection, we conclude his sentence is unreviewable. See

United States v. Baker, 64 F.3d 439, 441 (8th Cir. 1995) (sentence is not reviewable

where district court departs below applicable Guidelines sentencing range with or

without challenged enhancement); cf. United States v. Albers, 961 F.2d 710, 712 (8th

Cir. 1992) (“only the government may appeal a sentence if the sentence is less than the

sentence specified in the guideline range”).

In accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we have reviewed

the record to look for any nonfrivolous issues and have found none.

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
exv10w37






Exhibit 10.37









Director Compensation Summary



(to be effective as of the May 2010 Annual Meeting of the Board of Directors)



          Directors who also are employees of Quanta or any of its subsidiaries do not receive additional
compensation for serving as directors. Each non-employee director receives a fee for attendance at
each meeting of the Board of Directors or any committee according to the following schedule: $2,000
for attendance at a board meeting in person; $1,000 for attendance at a board meeting by telephone;
$1,000 for attendance at a committee meeting in person; and $500 for attendance at a committee
meeting by telephone. Upon initial appointment to the Board of Directors other than at an annual
meeting of stockholders, for the period from the appointment through the end of the director
service year during which the appointment is made, each such initially appointed non-employee
director receives a pro rata portion of both (i) an annual cash retainer payment of $50,000 and
(ii) an annual award of shares of restricted Common Stock having a value of $150,000. Upon initial
election to the Board of Directors at an annual meeting of stockholders, each such initially
elected non-employee director receives an annual cash retainer payment of $50,000 and an annual
award of shares of restricted Common Stock having a value of $150,000. At every annual meeting of
stockholders at which a non-employee director is re-elected or remains a director, each such
re-elected or remaining non-employee director receives an annual cash retainer payment of $50,000
and an annual award of shares of restricted Common Stock having a value of $100,000. In addition,
at every annual meeting of the Board of Directors, the chairman of the Audit Committee receives an
annual cash retainer payment of $14,000, the chairman of the Compensation Committee receives an
annual cash retainer payment of $10,000 and the chairman of the Governance and Nominating Committee
receive an annual cash retainer payment of $7,500. Unless the director’s service is interrupted,
shares of restricted Common Stock awarded to non-employee directors vest over three years in three
equal annual installments. Any unvested shares of restricted Common Stock will vest in full if the
non-employee director is not nominated for or elected to a new term or resigns at our convenience.
If the non-employee director voluntarily resigns or is asked to resign, or is removed for cause
prior to vesting, all unvested shares of restricted Common Stock will be forfeited. Directors are
reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board of
Directors or the committees thereof, and for other expenses reasonably incurred in their capacity
as directors of Quanta.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5335 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5335

                 For the relief of Tarveen Kaur Anand.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2006

 Mr. Sherman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 For the relief of Tarveen Kaur Anand.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMMEDIATE RELATIVE STATUS FOR TARVEEN KAUR ANAND.

    (a) In General.--Tarveen Kaur Anand shall be classified as an 
immediate relative within the meaning of section 201(b)(2)(A)(i) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act for purposes of approval of a relative 
visa petition filed under section 204 of such Act by Tarveen Kaur Anand 
and the filing of an application for an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Tarveen Kaur Anand enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), she 
shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the petition and the application for 
issuance of an immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of 
status are filed with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Tarveen Kaur Anand, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
for the following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas 
available under section 201(c)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Tarveen Kaur 
Anand shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 
privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

     Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 1350

     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Dover
Petroleum Corp. (the "Company")for the quarter ending March 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Date: January 15, 2004             /s/ Robert Salna


                                   Robert Salna, Principal Executive
                                   Officer



     The foregoing certification accompanied the Quarterly Report on
Form 10QSB filing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is being
reproduced herein for information only.  It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company, whether made before or after hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.  A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained b y the
Company and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

Nos. 06-13-00104-CR & 

06-13-00105-CR

DONALD ROBERT HANEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 102nd District Court

Red River County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. CR01693 & CR01730

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
2

O RDER

The clerk’s record in this matter was filed June 26, 2013, and the reporter’s record was 

filed July 2, 2013, making the appellant’s brief due August 1, 2013. The briefing deadline was 

extended twice on appellant’s motion, and the brief is currently due September 24, 2013. On 

September 24, 2013, appellant’s counsel filed a third motion to extend the deadline for filing 

appellant’s brief.

We have reviewed counsel’s third motion to extend and the record on appeal, and we 

have been provided with no compelling information to convince us that counsel needs additional 

time to prepare this brief. Consequently, the motion to extend time to file appellant’s brief is 

overruled.

By this order, we set the final deadline for filing appellant’s brief as October 24, 2013. 

Should appellant fail to file a brief within the time allotted, this appeal may be dismissed for 

want of prosecution pursuant to Rule 42.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. 

R. APP. P. 42.3.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: October 2, 2013
RE: STATE v. Tenedrick STRUDWICK

334P19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2019

Nicholas C. Woomer-Deters, Assistant Appellate Defender, For Strudwick, Tenedrick.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Sonya M. Calloway-Durham, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of August 2019 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of August 2019."
No. 09-9295.

#### Stanaus McCoy, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1044, 130 S. Ct. 2080,

176 L. Ed. 2d 427,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2838.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 348 Fed. Appx. 900.
STATE of North Carolina v. Adam Warren CONLEY

No. 75PA19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Emily H. Davis, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Conley, Adam Warren.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General.

John R. Green, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Michael Bonfoey, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 4th of March 2019 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th of March 2019 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
2005 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

10-17-2005

Benn v. First Judicial Dist

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 01-3769

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Benn v. First Judicial Dist" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 295.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/295
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

Nos. 01-3769, 01-4012

 

DONALD BENN,

 Appellant

 v.

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA; 

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; 

BOARD OF PENSIONS AND RETIREMENT MUNICIPAL

PENSION FUND OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA

 

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. No. 98-cv-05730)

District Judge: Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno

 

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

September 16, 2005

Before: SLOVITER, BARRY and SMITH, Circuit Judges

(Filed October 12, 2005)

 

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

IT IS ORDERED that the slip opinion in the above case, filed October 12,

2005, be amended as follows:

To insert the word “Judicial” before District on the following lines:

Page 10, line 23

Page 11, line 11

Page 11, line 14
2

By the Court,

 /s/ Dolores K. Sloviter 

Circuit Judge

Dated: 17 October 2005
EXHIBIT 32
                           ==========

        Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crafty Admiral Enterprises, Ltd.
(Registrant) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Lawrence Siccia, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Office of Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

   (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of Registrant.

Dated:  November 6, 2003       /s/ Lawrence Siccia
                              ----------------------------------
                              Chief Executive Officer and
                              Chief Financial Officer of
                              Crafty Admiral Enterprises, Ltd.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

December 13, 2000 Session

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROBERT LEE PATTEE

Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Sumner County

No. 239-1999 Jane Wheatcraft, Judge

No. M2000-00257-CCA-R3-CD - Filed May 3, 2001

JOSEPH M. TIPTON, J., concurring.

I concur in the result reached and most of the reasoning in the majority opinion. However,

I believe that the evidence was sufficient to warrant the jury being instructed regarding voluntary

manslaughter. I agree, though, that the failure to instruct the jury was harmless.

___________________________________ 

JOSEPH M. TIPTON, JUDGE
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 12

- 00066

- CR

EX PARTE Patricia Foster SKELTON

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Real County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- 2993

- DC Honorable Camile G. Dubose, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this c ourt’s opinion of this date, the appellant’s motion for rehearing is GRANTED and the habeas court’s order of December 11, 2011, denying habeas relief is REVERSED. We GRANT HABEAS RELIEF and VACATE the judgment in cause number 2004

- 0934

- DR from the 38th Jud icial District Court of Real County, Texas.

SIGNED May 28, 2014.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice