alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
23.1








CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Nos. 333-23853, 333-57602, 333-108489, 333-135156, and 333-149954) of our
reports dated August 14, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements
of Patriot Scientific Corporation and subsidiaries (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to Patriot
Scientific Corporation’s adoption of the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, as of
June 1, 2006) and  the effectiveness of Patriot Scientific Corporation’s
internal control over financial reporting (which report expresses an adverse
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting because of a material weakness), appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Patriot Scientific Corporation for the year ended May 31,
2008.











/s/ KMJ
Corbin & Company LLP


Irvine,
California


August
14, 2008
CERTIFICATION
      OF OFFICERS


OF
      ARTFEST INTERNATIONAL, INC.


PURSUANT
      TO 18 USC & 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE


SARBANES
      - OXLEY


ACT
      OF
      2002





I
      hereby
      certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-QSB,


and
      filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission


on
      the
      date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange


Act
      of
      1934 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of that
      section.





I
      further
      certify that the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents,


in
      all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of


the
      company.





s/s
      Joseph Walsh


Joseph
      Walsh, President


(Chief
      Executive Officer)











s/s
      Joseph Walsh


Joseph
      Walsh, Treasurer


(Chief
      Financial Officer)





December
      29, 2005
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40855 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
NELSON OMAR MARTINEZ, also known as Nelson Martinez

- Barahona , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:14

- CR

- 444

- 1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Nelson Omar
Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 1 6 , 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40855 Document: 00513080283 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2015No. 14

- 40855

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly , counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 14-40855 Document: 00513080283 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on
Form 10-Q of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp., (the
Company) for the period ended March 31, 2004
(the Report) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mary Jane Robertson,
Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |    |                                                                                                                                                              
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | this Report fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|
| | 2. | the information contained in this Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  May 7, 2004

| |     |                        
| | --- | -----------------------
| | By: | /s/ Mary Jane Robertson

| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| |                                      
| | Mary Jane Robertson                  
| | Senior Executive Vice President,     
| | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
ODNIHeader2




Print
  General Counsel Christopher Fonzone is the chief legal officer of the ODNI and the head of the Office of General Counsel (OGC). The General Counsel is nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. He is supported by a career staff that includes a Principal Deputy General Counsel, Deputy General Counsels, and attorneys and legal professionals. OGC’s role is to provide expert legal counsel to ODNI leadership and the agency’s personnel, including those assigned to its three intelligence centers, ensuring that all personnel assigned to the ODNI act in accordance with applicable law, regulations, and directives.
No. 09-9739.

#### Jesus Silvero Jaquez-Diaz, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1084, 130 S. Ct. 2134,

176 L. Ed. 2d 753,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3229.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 356 Fed. Appx. 725.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-20459 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. RYAN ANTHONY BURRELL Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-389-1
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ryan Anthony Burrell appeals the 21-month sentence imposed upon revocation ofhis second term ofsupervised release. He argues that the sentence is procedurally unreasonable because the district court imposed a sentence outside the advisory guidelines range and failed to explain adequately the basis for its deviation. He further argues that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D June 6, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-20459

2 The district court may impose any sentence that falls within the maximum term of imprisonment allowed by statute for the revocation sentence. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). In doing so, the district court is to consider the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and the advisory policy statements found in Chapter Seven of the Guidelines. U nited Statesv. Mathena, 23 F.3d 87, 90 (5th Cir. 1994). The statutory maximum term of imprisonment upon the revocation of Burrell’s first term of supervised release in 2006 was two years. See § 3583(e)(3). Burrell served three months in prison after the revocation ofhis first term ofsupervised release. Thus, the maximum sentence of imprisonment that could be imposed upon the revocation ofhis second term ofsupervised release was 21 months. See United States v. Jackson, 329 F.3d 406, 407 (5th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, although the 21-month sentence imposed by the district court exceeded the maximum advisory guideline range of three to nine months, it was not unreasonable or plainly unreasonable. See United Statesv. McKinney, 520 F.3d 425, 428 (5th Cir. 2008). Burrell’s argument that the district court did not adequately articulate its sentencing reasons alsofails. The record reflects that the district court took into account the nonbinding policy statements of Chapter 7 of the Sentencing Guidelines as well as the sentencing factors set forth in § 3553(a). See United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 2005). The court determined that
a 21-month sentence was appropriate given Burrell’s pattern of non-compliant behavior and demonstrable history of substance abuse. The inability of the district court to insure that Burrell would be placed in a facility offering drug treatment or that Burrell would receive treatment once he was imprisoned does not render his sentence unreasonable or plainly unreasonable. See 18 U.S.C. § 3621 ; United States v. Voda, 994 F.2d 149, 151-52 (5th Cir. 1993) (decision whether a prisoner received treatment for substance abuse is left to the discretion of the Bureau of Prisons). Thus, the judgment is AFFIRMED.
No. 09-10116.

#### Rachel Ruiz, Petitioner v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada.

560 U.S. 902, 130 S. Ct. 3312,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1181,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3991.

May 17, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until June 7, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
STATE of North Carolina v. Ben Lee CAPPS

No. 206A19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 26, 2019

Michelle F. Lynch, GAL Appellate Counsel

Nicholas C. Woomer-Deters, Assistant Appellate Defender, Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, for Capps, Ben Lee.

Vinston Walton, Associate Attorney General, Kristin Jo Uicker, Assistant Attorney General, Ted Bell, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*207***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 5th of June 2019 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of June 2019."
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 4 (Wednesday, January 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-55]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6475]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Cast in Bronze: French Sculpture From Renaissance to 
Revolution''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects in 
the exhibition: ``Cast in Bronze: French Sculpture from Renaissance to 
Revolution,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about February 
24, 2009, until on or about May 24, 2009; The J. Paul Getty Museum, Los 
Angeles, CA, from on or about June 30, 2009, until on or about 
September 27, 2009, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues 
yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of 
these Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: (202-
453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th 
Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: December 30, 2008.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-55 Filed 1-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  500,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   500,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,222
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,510
<OTHER-SE>                                   (625,577)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,755
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,145
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (42,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (42,900)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (42,900)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Earnest Taylor and Lisa Taylor d/b/a T & S Enterprises

Appellate case number: 01-19-00252-CV

Trial court case number: 81916-CV

Trial court: 23rd District Court of Brazoria County

On July 9, 2019, this Court dismissed relators Earnest Taylor and Lisa Taylor 

d/b/a T & S Enterprises’s petition for a writ of mandamus. See In re Taylor, No. 01-19-

00252-CV, 2019 WL 2932855 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] July 9, 2019, orig. 

proceeding) (mem. op.). After we granted their motion for an extension, relators’ motion 

for rehearing was due on August 9, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1, 49.8. Relators have 

filed a second motion for an extension of time. The motion is granted.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is due to be filed by September 19, 2019. No 

further extensions will be granted.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Russell Lloyd_____

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __August 15, 2019__
Exhibit 10.16

 

Resolution
 of the
 Board of Directors
 of
 City National Corporation

 

WHEREAS, the Corporation has previously adopted the City National Corporation Amended and Restated 2002 Omnibus Plan (the “Plan”) and the Plan was approved by the shareholders of the Corporation on April 28, 2004;

 

WHEREAS, the Board has been advised that section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, enacted as part of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, prohibits the grant of discounted stock options;

 

WHEREAS, the purpose of the First Amendment to the Plan is to conform the Plan to the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code;

 

WHEREAS, the Board is authorized to amend the Plan pursuant to Section 6.6(a) thereof;

 

WHEREAS, the Compensation, Nominating & Governance Committee (the “Committee”) has recommended approval by the Board of the First Amendment to the Plan to eliminate any grant or award of equity compensation to Non-Employee Directors;

 

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, pursuant to Section 6.6(a) of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended, as provided in the attached Exhibit A, to eliminate the grant of equity compensation under the Plan to Non-Employee Directors.

 

RESOLVED FURTHER, Provisions of the Plan not specifically amended by these Resolutions shall remain in full force and effect.

 

RESOLVED FURTHER, All capitalized terms which are used herein shall have the same definitions which are contained in the Plan, unless otherwise defined herein.

 











 

EXHIBIT A

 

1.  Section 1.1, Purpose, of the Plan is amended by deleting “, and to motivate and reward Non-Employee Directors with grants of Director Stock Options”.

 

2.  Section 1.2, Definitions, of the Plan is amended by deleting subsections (n) and (aa) and replacing them with the following:

 

(n)     Reserved

 

(aa)   “Participant” shall mean an Eligible Employee who has been granted an Award under this Plan.

 

3. Section 1.4, Participation,  of the Plan is amended by deleting the final sentence of such section:

 

“Non-Employee Directors shall be eligible to receive Awards under this Plan only as specified in Section 2.8 .”

 

4.  Section 1.5(a), Shares Available for Awards, Number of Shares, of the Plan is amended by:

 

(a) deleting, in the first sentence, “and grants of Director Stock Options to Non-Employee Directors”.

 

5.  Section 1.5(d), Shares Available for Awards, Reissue of Awards, of the Plan  is amended by deleting the last sentence of such subsection and replacing it with the following:

 

Only Shares which were originally awarded as Director Stock Options or Restricted Stock may be reissued as Restricted Stock.

 

6.  Section 2.8.,  Special Requirements for Director Stock Options,  of the Plan is amended by deleting the section in its entirety and replacing it with the following:

 

Section 2.8.,  Reserved.
# C_2017223EN.01000101.xml

| 12.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8482 — ABB/B&R)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 223/01)

On 3 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8482. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8482. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Cornelius Alvin NOBLES v. Stephen C. JACOBS Superintendent III Columbus Correctional Institution

No. 167P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2019

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ernie Lee, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Cornelius Alvin Nobles, for Nobles, Cornelius Alvin.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 2nd of May 2019 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Duplin County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd of May 2019 by Petitioner in the Alternative to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2019."

Davis, J. recused
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justic es

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk September 4, 2012

p0827 

# Order

September 4, 2012

145053

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145053

COA: 300128

Shiawassee CC: 10

- 000071

- FH

NATHAN ALBERT SAUNDERS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 19, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No. 09-1068.

#### John Marshall Cogswell, Petitioner v. United States Senate.

559 U.S. 1070, 130 S. Ct. 2114,

176 L. Ed. 2d 726,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3327.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 353 Fed. Appx. 175.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 44 (Monday, March 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5025]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE


Notice of Cancellation of Meeting of the Industry Trade Advisory 
Committee on Small and Minority Business (ITAC-11)

AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.

ACTION: Notice of meeting cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A notice was published in the Federal Register dated February 
26, 2009, Volume 74 page 8819 and March 4,2009, Volume number 74, 
Notice 41, page 9438, announcing a meeting of the Industry Trade 
Advisory Committee on Small and Minority Business (ITAC-11), scheduled 
for March 9, 2009, from 9 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. The meeting was to be 
closed to the public from 9 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. and open to the public 
from 1 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. However, the meeting has been cancelled in its 
entirety.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Hellstern, DFO for ITAC-11 at 
(202)482-3222, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

Lisa Garcia,
Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Intergovernmental Affairs and 
Public Liaison.
 [FR Doc. E9-5025 Filed 3-5-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3190-W9-P