alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U n i t e d S t a t e s C o u r t o f A pp e a l s For the Eig hth Circu it

_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ No . 2 2 -3 6 22

_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Un i t ed St at es o f Am eri ca
l ll l l l l l l l l l l l ll l l l l l Pl a i n t i

f f - Ap pel l ee

v
. Ken Tran g Tran

l ll l l l l l l l l l l l ll l l l l l Def

en da n t - Ap pel l an t

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Ap p eal fro m

Un i t edSt at es Di s t ri ct Co u rt fo r t he Eas t ern Di s t ri ct o f M i s s o u ri - St . Lo u i s

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Su b m i t t ed : Ap ri l 1 7, 2 0 23 Fi l ed : Ap ri l 2 0 , 2 0 2 3 [Un pu b l is h ed ]

_ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ Befo re GRUENDER, SHEPHERD, an d GRASZ, Ci rcu i t J u d g es

.

_ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ PER CURIAM

.Ken Tran ap peal s t he s en t en ce im p o s ed b y t he d i s tri ct co u rt 1 aft er h e p l ead ed g u i l t y t o a d ru g offen s e. Hi s co u n s el h as m o v ed fo r l eav e t o wi th d raw, an d h as fi l ed a b ri ef u n d er An d ers v . Cal i fo rn i a, 3 8 6 U.S. 7 3 8 (1 9 6 7 ), ch al l en g i n g t h e s en t en ce.
Up o n carefu l rev i ew, we c o n cl u d e t h at t h e d i s t ri ct co u rt d id n o t i m p o s e a
s u b s t an t i vel y u n reas on ab l e s en t en ce, as th e co u rt pro p erl y co ns i d ered t he fact o rs l i st ed i n 1 8 U.S.C. § 3 55 3 (a) an d d i d n o t err i n wei g h in g t h e rel ev a n t f a c t o r s

. See Un i ted St at es v
. Feem s ter, 5 7 2 F.3 d 45 5 , 46 1 -6 2 (8 t h Ci r. 2 0 09 ) (en b an c) (rev i ewi n g
s en t en ces fo r s u b s t an t i ve reas o n ab l en es s u n der d eferen t i al ab u s e of d i s cret i o n
s t an d ard ; ab u s e o f di scret i o n o ccu rs wh en t h e co u rt fai l s t o co n s i der rel ev an t fact o r, g i v es s i g ni fi can t wei g h t t o an i m p ro p er o r i rrel ev an t fact o r, o r co m m i t s a cl ear erro r
o f ju d g m en t i n wei g h i n g t h e ap pro p ri at e fact ors ); see al s o Un i ted St at es v
. M an g u m , 6 2 5 F.3 d 4 66 , 4 6 9 -7 0 (8 t h Ci r. 2 0 1 0 ) (u p ward vari an ce was reas o nab l e wh ere co u rt

m ad e i n di v i d u al i zed as s es s m en t b as ed o n fact s p res en t ed ).

W e h av e al s o i n dep en den t l y rev i ewed t h e reco rd un d er Pen so n v
. O h i o , 4 8 8 U.S. 7 5 (1 9 8 8 ), an d we fi n d n o n o n -fri v o lo u s i s su es fo r ap p eal

. Acco rd i n g l y , we affi rm th e ju dg m en t , an d we g ran t co u n s el ’ s m o t i o n t o wi t h d raw.

__ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _

1 Th e Ho n orab l e J o h n A. R o s s , U n it ed St at es Di s tri ct Co u rt J u d g e fo r t h e Eas t ern Di s t ri ct o f M i ss ou ri

. -2

-
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersignedcertifies that (1) this Quarterly Report of RFS Partnership, L.P. (the“Operating Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations for the Operating Partnership.

 
|                  | /s/ Thomas J. Hutchison,  III  |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------|
| Date: August 14, 2003 | Name: Thomas J. Hutchison, III |
|                  | Title: Chief Executive Officer |
|                  | (Principal Executive  Officer) |

 

----
ex10118k021911.htm






  





  











  








PROMISSORY NOTE








	
Pocatello, Idaho

	
Amount: $25,000

















FOR VALUE RECEIVED, TETRIDYN SOLUTIONS, INC., an Idaho corporation of 1651 Alvin Ricken Drive, Pocatello, ID  83201 (“Maker”), promises to pay to the order of DAVID AND ANTOINETTE HEMPSTEAD of Idaho Falls, Idaho (“Payee”) the principal sum of $25,000.00, with interest accruing thereon as described below.








	
  

	
1.

	
The loan will have 0% interest if repaid within sixty (60) days of receipt of funds by the Maker.  If the loan is not repaid within sixty (60) days of receipt of funds by the Maker, the Maker will be charged 10% to compensate the Payee for fees associated with securing the loan funds.













	
  

	
2.

	
If the loan is repaid within one year of receipt of funds by the Maker, no annual interest rate will be charged.  If the loan is not repaid within one year of receipt of funds, the annual interest rate will be 6% starting at the one-year anniversary date of the loan.













	
  

	
3.

	
The Payee is authorized to convert part or all of the loan balance and accrued interest to common stock of the Maker at fair market value at any time.













	
  

	
4.

	
The loan’s due date for full repayment is December 31, 2014.












This Promissory Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho.







In the event this Note is placed with an attorney for collection or enforcement of any of its terms or provisions, whether or not suit is filed, the undersigned promises to pay, in addition to costs provided by statute or rule a reasonable attorney’s fee.







Payment of this Note is unsecured.







DATED this 19th day of February, 2011.







TETRIDYN SOLUTIONS, INC.







By:  /s/ David W. Hempstead


David W. Hempstead, President












By:  /s/ Antoinette Knapp


Antoinette Knapp, Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GRANITE
BROADCASTING CORPORATION'S JUNE 30, 1996 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,191,735
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               27,195,034
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,240,626
<PP&E>                                      33,021,295
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             448,339,678
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,482,280
<BONDS>                                    346,536,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       45,487,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        86,774
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,712,498
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,799,272
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,961,195
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,104,488
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               606,275
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,266,076
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,984,356
<INCOME-TAX>                                   174,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,809,756
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                618,902
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,428,658
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

| March 29, 2007

  | By:    | /s/                               Brian D. Comer |   |
|------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| (Date)

          |   | Brian D. Comer

President

 

                                                                                                                                                                    |   |

 

 

 

----
CHARLESTON.

#### Florence Hunt *et al. v.*Emma Mounts *et al.*

Submitted March 25, 1924.

Decided April 1, 1924.

Appeal aito *Eirbob.-*— ■Appellate *Court Without Jurisdiction to Review Judgment for Costs Only.*

■Where on the trial of an action a demurrer to the evidence is -sustained, and the court does not render a judgment, of *nil capiat,*hut only for costs, there is no final judgment, and the appellate court is without jurisdiction to review the case.

McGinnis, Judge, absent.

Error to Circuit Court, Mingo- County.

Action by Florence Hunt and others against Emma Mounts and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs bring error.

*Dismissed, as improvidently awarded.*

*Stafford & Rhodes,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Gooclyhoontz, Seherr & Slaven,*for defendants in error.

Miller, Judge:

Upon the trial of this action in ejectment, defendants interposed a demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence. On the conditional verdict of the jury, the court entered the following order: “And the matters of law arising upon the de*144f endants ’ demurrer to the evidence in this case being argued by counsel and considered by the court, the court is of opinion that the law thereon is for the defendants. It is therefore considered that the law of the case is with the defendants. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the defendants recover of and from the plaintiffs their costs in this behalf expended.”

Defendants in error have filed in this court their motion to dismiss the writ of error as having been improvidently awarded. The record does not show that any final judgment was rendered in the ease. The judgment is for costs only. Upon finding that the law was for defendants, the court should have entered a judgment of *nil capiat.*On the authority of *Kirk*v. *Camden Interstate Railway Company,*66 W. Va. 486, and *Bower*v. *Virginian Railway Company,*68 W. Va. 629, and the-numerous eases cited therein, the writ of error awarded in this case must be dismissed, and the case remanded for further proceedings.

*Dismissed, as improvidently awarded.*
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



In connection with this Quarterly Report of Hewitt Associates, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                  |  |     |  |                        
|----------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 4, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Dale L. Gifford    
|                  |  |     |  | Dale L. Gifford        
|                  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Hewitt Associates, Inc. and will be retained by Hewitt Associates, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as and exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part
of the Form 10-Q.
Dismiss and Opinion Filed March 18, 2015 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-15-00241-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF NORMAN SIMON BROWN, DECEASED

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR-14-04275-2



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Francis

Appellant has filed a motion stating he has elected to dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id.

150241F.P05 /Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN THE ESTATE OF NORMAN SIMON BROWN, DECEASED

No. 05-15-00241-CV On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR-14-04275-2. Opinion delivered by Justice Francis. Justices Lang-Miers and Whitehill participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellee Dorothy Brow n recover her costs, if a ny, of this appeal from appellant Dr. Stephen Brown, DC.

Judgment entered March 18, 2015.
| Date:      May 17, 2010 |                                             |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                    |                                             |
|                    | /s/ Jinyuan Li                                   |
|                    |                                             |
|                    | Jinyuan      Li                                  |
|                    | Chief      Executive Officer and President       |
|                    | (Principal      Executive Officer)               |
|                    |                                             |
| Date:      May 17, 2010 |                                             |
|                    |                                             |
|                    | /s/ Manbo      He                                |
|                    |                                             |
|                    | Manbo      He                                    |
|                    | Chief      Financial Officer                     |
|                    | (Principal      Financial and AccountingOfficer) |

----
#### Anthony Katras, Appellant, v Etan Furniture, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[719 NYS2d 882]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated February 29, 2000, which granted the separate motions of the defendants Etan Furniture, Inc., and ISJ Management Corporation for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as granted those branches of the motions which were for summary judg*613ment dismissing all cross claims insofar as asserted against the respondents, are dismissed, as the plaintiff is not aggrieved by that portion of the order *(see,*CPLR 5511); it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The moving defendants made a prima facie showing that they were entitled to judgment as a matter of law by offering sufficient evidence demonstrating the absence of any issue of fact with respect to the creation of the alleged dangerous condition or actual or constructive notice thereof *(see,*CPLR 3212 [b]; *Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see, Lustgarten v Oceanside Union Free School Dist.,*277 AD2d 430). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the branches of the respondents’ respective motions which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. Ritter, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
State of California 

AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

ERRATA 

TITLES 13 and 17. CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

By notice dated August 28, 2007, and published in the September 7, 2007, California 

Regulatory Notice Register, Register 2007, No. 36-Z, the Air Resources Board (the 

“Board” or “ARB”) provided Notice of Public Hearing to Consider the Adoption of 

Proposed Regulations to Reduce Emissions from Diesel Engines on Commercial 

Harbor Craft Operated within California Waters and 24 Nautical Miles of the California 

Baseline. 

PLEASE BE ADVISED there was an error in the notice regarding the ARB Internet Site 

for this rulemaking. The following ARB Internet site appears in paragraph 5 on page 13 

of the notice: 

www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2007/chc07/chc07 

This ARB Internet Site was corrected to read as follows: 

www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2007/chc07/chc07.htm 

The complete text of the notice and the Initial Statement of Reasons are available on 

the ARB Internet site for this rulemaking at 

www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2007/chc07/chc07.htm. 

Any questions regarding these corrections should be directed to Alexa Malik, Manager, 

Board Administration & Regulatory Coordination Unit at (916) 322-4011 or Amy Whiting, 

Regulations Coordinator at (916) 322-6533. 

If you have a disability-related accommodation need, please go to 

http://www.arb.ca.gov/html/ada/ada.htm for assistance or contact the ADA Coordinator at 

(916) 323-4916. If you are a person who needs assistance in a language other than 

English, please contact the Bilingual Coordinator at (916) 324-5049. TTY/TDD/Speech-toSpeech users may dial 7-1-1 for the California Relay Service. 

CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

 /s/ 

Tom Cackette 

Acting Executive Officer 

Date: September 7, 2007
STATE of North Carolina v. Anthony Vinh NGUYEN

No. 15P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Michele A. Goldman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Nguyen, Anthony Vinh.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender.

Amy Kunstling Irene, Special Deputy Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 8th of January 2019 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th of January 2019 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."
BOLES, et al.

v.

TOWN OF OAK ISLAND

290A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 19, 2019

Norman B. Smith, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, For Traywick, Robert L., et al

Charles C. Meeker, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Town of Oak Island

Stephen V. Cary, Attorney at Law, For Town of Oak Island

Brian E. Edes, Attorney at Law, Wilmington, For Town of Oak Island

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 19th of August 2019 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th of August 2019."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 13th day of September 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

SOPHIA BAKER,

1

Respondent Below,

Appellant,

v.

JAMES VOSS,

Petitioner Below,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 174, 2021

§

§ Court Below: Family Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ File No. CN20-01991

§ Petition No. 20-07695 

§ 

§ In the interest of:

§ Karen Voss-Baker

§ 

Submitted: August 24, 2021

Decided: September 15, 2021

O R D E R

(1) On July 20, 2021, the Senior Court Clerk sent a letter directing the 

appellant to pay the Family Court filing fee and transcript cost on or before August 

3, 2021, or this Court would issue a notice to show cause why the appeal should not 

be dismissed. On August 6, 2021, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice, sent by 

certified mail, directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be 

dismissed for the appellant’s failure to pay the Family Court filing fee and transcript 

cost. 

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).
2

(2) On August 13, 2021, the Court received the certified mail receipt 

indicating that the notice to show cause had been delivered on August 11, 2021. A 

timely response to the notice to show cause would have been due on or before August 

23, 2021. The appellant having failed to respond to the notice to show cause within 

the required ten-day period, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b) 

and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice
# C_2016174EN.01002801.xml

| 14.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/28

---

Corrigendum to Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 171 of 12 May 2016
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 171 of 12 May 2016

(2016/C 174/11)

On page 4, section ‘Deadline for submission of tenders’:

for:

for:

‘27 June 2016, 10:00 CET’,

read:

read:

‘15 July 2016, 10:00 CET’.

---