alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23-7

[NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. LETTERHEAD]



                               February 27, 1998


MCN Energy Group Inc.
500 Griswold
Detroit, Michigan 48226

RE:  MCN Energy Group Inc.
     1997 Annual Report on From 10-K

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     The firm of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. consents to the use of
its name and the information contained in this report dated January 15, 1998,
regarding MCN Energy Group Inc.'s oil and gas reserve information as of December
31, 1997 in its 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

     In addition, Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. consents to the
incorporation by reference of said material in registration Statement Nos.
333-02105 and 333-02107 on Form S-8, 333-01523, 333-21175, and 333-45281 on Form
S-3, and Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No.
33-21930-99 on Form S-8 of MCN Energy Group Inc.

     Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. has no interest in MCN Energy Group
Inc. or in any affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive such
interest as payment for such reports and has no director, officer, or employee
otherwise connected with MCN Energy Group Inc. We are not employed by MCN Energy
Group Inc. on a contingent basis.



                                        NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.


                                        By: /s/ Clarence M. Netherland
                                        ---------------------------------
                                            Clarence M. Netherland
                                            Chairman
No. 09-10162.

#### Andres Ernesto Hernandez, Petitioner v. Miguel Villicana.

560 U.S. 916, 130 S. Ct. 3304,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1205,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4099.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 344 Fed. Appx. 380.
##### 



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  1)
    
    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months
ended September 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the three months ended September 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Plumas
Bancorp.
 Date:  November 8, 2006
    /s/ D. N. BiddleDouglas N. Biddle,Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(b)

             CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER RELATING
              TO A PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     I, Arthur B. Winkleblack, Director, Vice President, and Chief Financial
Officer of H. J. Heinz Finance Company, a Delaware corporation ("Heinz
Finance"), hereby certify that, to my knowledge:

     1. Heinz Finance's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
January 26, 2005 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Heinz
Finance.

Date: March 7, 2005

                                          By: /s/ ARTHUR B. WINKLEBLACK
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name: Arthur B. Winkleblack
                                          Title:  Director, Vice President, and
                                              Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 21, 2006 

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10621

Conference Calendar

MICHAEL J. FRISCHENMEYER,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL

JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:05-CV-91

--------------------

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michael J. Frischenmeyer, Texas prisoner # 698940, moves for

a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the denial of his

28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. In that petition, Frischenmeyer

challenged the Texas Parole Board’s refusal to grant him release

on parole. Frischenmeyer was released on mandatory supervision

on May 9, 2006. Frischenmeyer’s claims have been rendered moot

by his release. See Bailey v. Southerland, 821 F.2d 277, 278-79

(5th Cir. 1987). Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is
No. 05-10621

-2-

DISMISSED AS MOOT. COA is DENIED AS MOOT.
DICESARE, et al. v. The CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY

156A17-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 15, 2019

Russ Ferguson, III, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority.

James P. Cooney, III, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority.

Mark J. Horoschak, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority.

Brian Allen Hayles, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority.

Sarah Motley Stone, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, d/b/a Carolinas Healthcare System.

Reynolds Michael Elliot, Attorney at Law, For DiCesare, Christopher, et al.

Linwood Jones, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For N.C. Hospital Association.

Debbie W. Harden, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority.

Michael P. Fischer, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority.

Matthew Tilley, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority.

Hampton Y. Dellinger, Attorney at Law, For The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority.

Kathleen M. Konopka, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, For DiCesare, Christopher, et al.

Alexander L. Simon, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, For DiCesare, Christopher, et al.

Benjamin E. Shiftan, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, For DiCesare, Christopher, et al.

Daniel Seltz, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, For DiCesare, Christopher, et al.

Adam Gitlin, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, For DiCesare, Christopher, et al.

Brendan P. Glackin, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, For DiCesare, Christopher, et al.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 12th of July 2019 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of July 2019."
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Willamette Valley Vineyards,
Inc.'s, Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-69188) of our report on
the audit of the financial statements of Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.,
as of December 31, 2004, and for the year then ended. Our report is dated
February 26, 2005, and appears in Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.'s, Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ Moss Adams LLP

Santa Rosa, California
April 14, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1211 

CAF 14-01143 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

 

IN THE MATTER OF DANIEL P., PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, 

 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DANIELLE W., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

CARA A. WALDMAN, FAIRPORT, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

JESSICA REYNOLDS-AMUSO, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, CLINTON.

JOHN G. KOSLOSKY, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, UTICA. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (James R.

Griffith, J.), entered June 2, 2014 in a proceeding pursuant to Family

Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded

petitioner sole custody of the subject children. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs. 

Same memorandum as in Matter of Daila W. ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d

___ [Nov. 20, 2015]). 

Entered: November 20, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 4 (Wednesday, January 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-49]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP08-436-000]


Stingray Pipeline Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Informal Settlement 
Conference

December 31, 2008.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened 
in this proceeding commencing at 10 a.m. on Thursday, January 8, 2009, 
at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426 for the purpose of exploring the 
possible settlement of the above-referenced dockets.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as 
defined by 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).
    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please 
send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#600103030513130902090c09141920060512034e070f16"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cfaeacacaabcbca6ada6a3a6bbb68fa9aabdace1a8a0b9">[email protected]</span></a> or call toll free 1-866-208-
3372 (voice) or (202) 208-8659 (TTY), or send a FAX to (202) 208-2106 
with the required accommodations.
    For additional information, please contact Marc Gary Denkinger, 
(202) 502-8662, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#34595546571a50515a5f5d5a53514674525146571a535b42"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b9d4d8cbda97dddcd7d2d0d7dedccbf9dfdccbda97ded6cf">[email protected]</span></a> or Lorna Hadlock, (202) 502-
8737 <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4b272439252a65232a2f272428200b2d2e3928652c243d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b5d9dac7dbd49bddd4d1d9dad6def5d3d0c7d69bd2dac3">[email protected]</span></a>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-49 Filed 1-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
A00A1014.

#### BURNS v. THE STATE.

(537 SE2d 768)

Miller, Judge.

After having pled guilty to Count 1 (criminal trespass)1 and Count 2 (theft by taking),2 Mark Burns was nevertheless tried and convicted of these charges and of Count 3, which charged him with robbery by sudden snatching arising out of the same conduct.3 The evidence showed that he entered a restaurant and intentionally confused the cashier so that she would give him too much money in exchange for certain large bills. When the cashier stated she would have to get the manager, Bums grabbed the restaurant’s money she still held in her hand and escaped. The court merged the theft count into the robbery count. He appeals the robbery conviction on the ground that no evidence showed that the victim was conscious of the taking prior to the completion of the taking.

It is true that to prove a case of robbery by sudden snatching, the State must prove that the victim was conscious of something being taken from her and that for any reason she was unable to prevent it.4 It is also true that the difference between robbery by sudden snatching and theft by taking is that in theft by taking the property is taken without the knowledge of the victim, whereas in robbery by sudden snatching the victim must become aware, before the taking is complete, that the property is being taken away from her.5

*333Decided July 26, 2000.

*Ann C. Stahl,*for appellant.

*T. Joseph Campbell, District Attorney, Mickey R. Thacker, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

Burns testified that he did not snatch the money held in the victim’s hand but that she gave it to him willingly because he had successfully confused her into thinking that it was also his. The victim testified otherwise, stating that she knew the money in her hand belonged to the restaurant and that she did not intend to give the money to Burns voluntarily. She and her co-worker testified that Bums forcibly grabbed or snatched the money from her hand and then ran out of the store. As there was evidence from which a jury could find that the victim was aware, before the taking was complete, that Bums was taking money that belonged to her employer, the evidence sufficed to sustain the conviction for robbery by sudden snatching.6

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Pope, P. J., and Mikell, J., concur.*

1

 OCGA § 16-7-21 (b) (1).

2

 OCGA § 16-8-2.

3

 OCGA § 16-8-40 (a) (3).

4

*Williams v. State,*9 Ga. App. 170 (1) (70 SE 890) (1911); accord *Lawson v. State,*224 Ga. App. 645 (1) (481 SE2d 856) (1997).

5

*Williams,*supra, 9 Ga. App. at 170-171 (1); *Lawson,*supra,224 Ga. App. at 646 (1).

6

 See *King v. State,*214 Ga. App. 311(1) (447 SE2d 645) (1994); see generally *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).
##### 



Exhibit 10.2
 SOURCEFIRE, INC.
 2008 EXECUTIVE ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN
 SECTION 1
ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE
 Purpose Plan
 Effective Date
 SECTION 2
DEFINITIONS
  Actual Award
 Base Salary
 Beneficiary
 Board
 Code




---



##### 



Committee
 Company
 Corporate Transaction
      Determination Date
 Disability
 2




---



##### 



Maximum Award
 Participant
 Payout Formula
 Performance Goals
 Performance Period
 Plan Year
 Related Company
 3




---



##### 



Retirement
 Target Award
 SECTION 3
SELECTION OF PARTICIPANTS AND DETERMINATION OF AWARDS
 Selection of Participants
 Determination of Performance Goals
 Determination of Target Awards
 Determination of Payout Formula or Formulae
 Determination of Actual Awards
 4




---



##### 



SECTION 4
PAYMENT OF AWARDS
 Right to Receive Payment
 Timing of Payment
   Form of Payment
 Other Deferral of Actual Awards
 Termination of Employment During a Performance Period.
 For Reasons Other Than Retirement, Leave of Absence, Disability or Death
 5




---



##### 



Payment in the Event of Death
 For Retirement, Leave of Absence or Disability
 Calculation and Payment of Prorated Actual Awards and Target Awards for Termination
During a Performance Period
 Payment in the Event of a Corporate Transaction
 6




---



##### 



SECTION 5
ADMINISTRATION
 Administrator
 Committee Authority
 Tax Withholding
 SECTION 6
GENERAL PROVISION
 Nonassignability
 No Effect on Employment
 No Individual Liability
 7




---



##### 



Severability; Governing Law
 Affiliates of the Company
 SECTION 7
AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION
 Amendment and Termination
 8




---



##### 



SOURCEFIRE, INC.
 2008 EXECUTIVE ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN
 PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
 Company Participant
 Plan
    Purpose
 Participant in the Plan.
 Award Components:
    
    ___ Performance Goals will be used to determine the
Target Award for the applicable Performance Period as
determined by the Committee.Performance Goals:
    
    The following Performance Goals shall be applicable for
the two Performance Periods occurring in the [2009]
Plan Year:
Company Revenue  [insert threshold and how much this
components makes up the award]
Earnings Per Share  [insert threshold and how much
this components makes up the award]
 1




---



##### 



The annual Target Award for this executive position is
___% of the annual Base Salary. Payments will be
subject to applicable payroll taxes and withholdings.Target Award:
    
    The calculation of the annual Target Award shall be
based on eligible Base Salary for the Plan Year. The
Committee has the discretion to prorate an Actual Award
based on the number of days a Participant is employed
during the applicable Performance Period as set forth
in the Plan.Maximum Award:
 Award Payments.
 Achievement Schedule
 Adjustments to Performance Goals
 Exchange Rates
 Incorporation of Plan.
 Taxes
 No Effect on Terms of Employment Relationship
 2




---



##### 



Entire Agreement: Governing Law
 Administration and Interpretation
  SOURCEFIRE, INC.,
a Delaware corporationByIts
  Dated:
    
    
    
    Signed:
 3
Joyce L. Connery, Chair

Thomas A. Summers, Vice Chair

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES

SAFETY BOARD

Washington, DC 20004-2901

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

October 20, 2023

Contact: Tara Tadlock

(202) 694-7176

PRESS RELEASE

DNFSB Announces Loss of a Quorum of Board Members 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) lost 

a quorum of Board Members effective today. With the retirement of Ms. Jessie H. 

Roberson on October 18, 2023, the Board is reduced to two Board Members. 

Pursuant to the Board’s enabling legislation, The Board’s Chair sent the notification

below to Congress yesterday. 

“This letter is to notify you that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2286(e)(3), 

the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board no longer has a quorum 

due to the number of vacant Board Member positions. Therefore, 

effective immediately, I will carry out the delegated functions and 

powers of the Board consistent with 42 U.S.C. § 2286(e)(2). I will note 

that I am only authorized to exercise these delegated functions and 

powers for a period of one-year. If a quorum has not been restored 

prior to October 18, 2024, the Board will remain without a quorum and 

the delegation will expire, leaving the Board unable to exercise its 

authority.

If you have questions, please contact our Associate Director for Board 

Operations, Tara Tadlock, at 202-694-7090 or TaraT@dnfsb.gov.”

The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board is thankful to Ms. Roberson for 

her decades of faithful service to the nation, the defense nuclear complex, 

and especially to the Board. She will be greatly missed.
Date: 21 December 2021 **********************

NSN: 8920-01-691-4844 (TORW) MONOGRAPH : M3G2

 **********************

Item: Whole grain, Flavor 3 

Document: PCR-T-008, Tortillas, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 220 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 3 years at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Light to medium tan color with brown flecks typical of whole grain flour. Thin, round 

and easily separable. The tortillas may have small tan to amber spots (less than one 

inch) randomly dispersed on the surface. 

Odor: Cooked whole grain wheat flour, slightly sweet, slightly sour.

Flavor: Cooked whole grain wheat flour, slightly sweet, slightly sour and slightly bitter. May 

have a slightly uncooked wheat dough flavor.

Texture: Soft, pliable, and slightly chewy.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkened.

Odor: Rancid, sour.

Flavor: Rancid, sour.

Texture: Dry, not pliable. Cracks or breaks when unfolded.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

N/A

Special Notes

For Type I this product is two tortillas (folded in half) and oxygen scavenger packet(s) per pouch. 

For Type II this product is 50 tortillas (packed flat in two stacks of 25 tortillas) and oxygen scavenger(s) per 

pouch.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(a)

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer of Jordan Industries,
Inc., an Illinois corporation (the "Registrant"), hereby certifies that the
Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Annual Report") of the Registrant for the year
ended December 31, 2006, which accompanies this certification, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a)) and that the information contained in the Annual
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.

Date: March 30, 2007


/s/ John W. Jordan II
-------------------------------------
John W. Jordan II
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1
 
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 By:

/s/ Nigel JamesNigel JamesPresident and Principal Executive Officer
ofSuperfund Capital Management, Inc.,
the general partner of Quadriga Superfund, L.P.
May 14, 2008 E-2