alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**











**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer of ULURU INC.**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant**


**to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ULURU INC. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the
“Report”), the undersigned officer of ULURU INC. does hereby certify, pursuant
      to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
      (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1.)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2.)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.








Date:
                August 21, 2006
            
            /s/
                Kerry P. GrayKerry
                P. GrayPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer
Summary of the Registrant's Compensatory Arrangements with Executive Officers



 Exhibit 10.17 
 Summary of the Registrant’s Compensatory Arrangements with Executive Officers 
  

					
	 Name and Title
	  	Base Salary for 2011
(effective April 4, 2011)	 
	 Paul Sagan
CEO
	  	$	750,000	  
	 J. Donald Sherman
Senior Vice President — Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	443,500	  
	 Debra Canner
Senior Vice President — Human Resources
	  	$	294,000	  
	 Melanie Haratunian
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
	  	$	347,000	  
	 Robert Hughes
Executive Vice President — Global Sales, Services and Marketing
	  	$	443,500	  
	 David Kenny
President
	  	$	560,000	  
	 Tom Leighton
Chief Scientist
	  	$	20,000
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN H. THOMPSON; MELANIE 

SALYERS THOMPSON, 

Petitioners-Appellants, 

 v. 

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL 

REVENUE, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

No. 16-72537 

Tax Ct. No. 4628-15 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from a Decision of the

United States Tax Court

Submitted August 9, 2017**

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

John H. Thompson and Melanie Salyers Thompson appeal pro se from the 

Tax Court’s decision, following a bench trial, upholding the Commissioner of 

Internal Revenue’s determination of deficiencies. We have jurisdiction under 26 

U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We review de novo the Tax Court’s legal conclusions and for 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 14 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-72537 

clear error its factual determinations. Kelley v. Comm’r, 45 F.3d 348, 350 (9th Cir.

1995). We affirm.

The Tax Court properly concluded that appellants did not meet their burden 

of proving they were entitled to a foreign earned income exclusion. See 26 U.S.C. 

§ 911(d)(1) (definition of “qualified individual”); id. § 911(d)(4) (requirements for 

waiver of period of stay in a foreign country). Contrary to appellants’ contentions,

any prior allowance of the exclusion or failure to provide a clear explanation as to 

any change in position regarding the exclusion does not provide a basis for relief. 

See Dixon v. United States, 381 U.S. 68, 72-73 (1965) (“[T]he Commissioner is 

empowered retroactively to correct mistakes of law in the application of the tax 

laws to particular transactions . . . even where a taxpayer may have relied to his 

detriment on the Commissioner’s mistake.”). 

The Tax Court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellants’ motion for 

reconsideration and motion to vacate because the motions provided no basis to 

conclude that the Tax Court’s prior decisions were in error. See Thomas v. Lewis, 

945 F.2d 1119, 1123 (9th Cir. 1991) (standard of review for motion to vacate); 

Parkinson v. Comm’r, 647 F.2d 875, 876 (9th Cir. 1981) (standard of review for 

motion for reconsideration). 
3 16-72537 

To the extent appellants challenge the denial of the motion to dismiss, we

reject the challenge as meritless.

AFFIRMED.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 69/2007

of 25 January 2007         

determining the extent to which applications lodged in January 2007 for import licences under the regime provided for by tariff quotas for certain products in the pigmeat sector for the period 1 January to 31 March 2007 can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1458/2003 of 18 August 2003 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for certain products in the pigmeat sector (1), and in particular Article 5(6) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 January to 31 March 2007 submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1458/2003 shall be met as referred to in Annex I.

2.   For the period 1 April to 30 June 2007, applications may be lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1458/2003 for import licences for a total quantity as referred to in Annex II.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 26 January 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 January 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 208, 19.8.2003, p. 3. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 341/2005 (OJ L 53, 26.2.2005, p. 28).

----

ANNEX I

----

ANNEX II

----
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-11007 

Conference Calendar

__________________

STANLEY J. STEVENS,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

R. TUCKER, LT., Employees, TDCJ Dalhart Unit;

R.J. ALFORD, CAPT., Employees, TDCJ Dalhart Unit;

A. BEAMER, Employees, TDCJ Dalhart Unit,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:95-CV-165

- - - - - - - - - -

March 1, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Stevens appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Stevens argues that the

defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical

needs by disciplining him for refusing to work.

We have reviewed the record, the district court's opinion,

and appellant's brief and discern no reversible error. Further,

we hold that Stevens' appeal is frivolous, and accordingly, we 
No. 95-11007

-2-

DISMISS it pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Stevens is hereby

BARRED from filing any pro se, in forma pauperis, civil appeal in

this court, or any pro se, in forma pauperis, initial civil

pleading in any court which is subject to this court's

jurisdiction, without the advance written permission of a judge

of the forum court; the clerk of this court and the clerks of all

federal district courts in this Circuit are directed to return to

Stevens, unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this

bar. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED.
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201700009

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

JOSEPH P. BAILEY

Culinary Specialist First Class (E-6), U.S. Navy

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Captain Charles Purnell, JAGC, USN.

Convening Authority: Commandant, Naval District Washington, 

Washington Navy Yard, Washington, D.C.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Commander James A. Link, 

JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: Commander Robert D. Evans, Jr., JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 2 May 2017

_________________________

Before MARKS, JONES, and ELLINGTON, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION of CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Graphco Holdings Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended  September 30, 2003 filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I,  Cristian  Ivanescu,
President,  Chief  Executive Offer and Chairman,  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002 that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the
dates  presented  and  consolidated  result of operations of the Company for the
period presented.

Dated: November 19, 2003

                                                      /s/ Cristian Ivanescu
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Cristian Ivanescu
                                                      President, Chief Executive
                                                      Officer and Chairman
CERTIFICATION REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David C. Levy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AGU Entertainment,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal controls and procedures for financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and;

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 25, 2004


/s/ David C. Levy
-----------------
David C. Levy
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### Ernest James CASTRO, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 21895.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 8, 1965.

Ernest James Castro, pro se.

James R. Gough, Asst. U. S. Atty., Woodrow Seals, U. S. Atty., William B. Butler, Asst. U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for appellee.

Before BROWN and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and KILKENNY* District Judge.

*

 Of the District of Oregon, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

 Appellant was convicted of contempt for refusing to testify before a federal grand jury, although granted immunity from prosecution in the federal and state courts under Title 18 U.S.C.A. 1406. His petition for habeas corpus, which was treated by the district court as a motion to vacate sentence under Title 28 U.S.C.A. 2255, was denied, and he appeals. His privilege against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment was not violated. The privilege falls in the face of the immunity statute, which is constitutional. Reina v. United States, *685364 U.S. 507, 81 S.Ct. 260, 5 L.Ed.2d 249 (1960); Piemonte v. United States, 367 U.S. 556, 81 S.Ct. 1720, 6 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1961); cf. Murphy v. Waterfront Comm., 378 U.S. 52, 84 S.Ct. 1594, 12 L.Ed.2d 678 (1964). The recent case of Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 12 L.Ed.2d 653, relied upon by appellant, is inapposite. It was concerned with a state prosecution and did not involve a promise of immunity.

The judgment is affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10263-10264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5051]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[F-40256, F-40257, F-40258; AK-964-1410-KC-P]

Alaska Native Claims Selection

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that 
an appealable decision approving the surface and subsurface estates in 
certain lands for conveyance pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims 
Settlement Act will be issued to Doyon, Limited. The lands are in the 
vicinity of Chicken, Alaska, and are located in:

Fairbanks Meridian, Alaska

T. 8 S., R. 28 E.,
    Secs. 2 to 11, inclusive;
    Secs. 14 to 18, inclusive.

    Containing approximately 9,573 acres.

    Notice of the decision will also be published four times in the 
Fairbanks Daily News-Miner.

DATES: The time limits for filing an appeal are:
    1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely 
affected by the decision shall have until April 9, 2009 to file an 
appeal.
    2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail 
shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.
    Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the 
requirements of 43

[[Page 10264]]

CFR Part 4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land 
Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, 13, 
Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Bureau of Land Management by phone 
at 907-271-5960, or by e-mail at [email protected]. Persons 
who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8330, 24 hours a day, 
seven days a week, to contact the Bureau of Land Management.

Hillary Woods,
Land Law Examiner, Land Transfer Adjudication I.
 [FR Doc. E9-5051 Filed 3-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
```
No. 09-9406.

#### Anthony Jackson, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1055, 130 S. Ct. 2363,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2971.

176 L. Ed. 2d 572,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
STATE v. Cedric Theodis HOBBS, Jr.

263PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 22, 2019

John Keating Wiles, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

Amy Kunstling Irene, Special Deputy Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Sterling P. Rozear, Assistant Appellate Defender, Cedric Theodis Hobbs, Jr., for Hobbs, Cedric Theodis (Jr.)

***Amended***

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 18th of April 2019 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of April 2019."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 29th day of May 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
STATE of North Carolina v. Coriante PIERCE

No. 183P19-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 22, 2019

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Coriante Pierce, For Pierce, Coriante.

Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 2nd of July 2019 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp. (the“Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Nikolas Antonopoulos, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated:  November 1, 2007 By:  /s/      *Nikolas Antonopoulos*    Nikolas Antonopoulos    President and Chief Executive Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission, or its staff, upon request.
Veda WOODARD, Petitioner, v. NC DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY and Zebulon Chamber of Commerce, Inc., Respondents.

No. COA19-135

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 3, 2019

AFFIRMED.
In the MATTER OF: A.S.T.

No. COA18-947

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 21, 2019

AFFIRMED.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5162 

To pay a one-time bonus to members of the Armed Forces who serve honorably in a combat zone designated for Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation Enduring Freedom, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2006 

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To pay a one-time bonus to members of the Armed Forces 

who serve honorably in a combat zone designated for 

Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation Enduring Freedom, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5162 IH 

1 SECTION 1. ONE-TIME BONUS FOR SERVICE IN COMBAT 

2 ZONE DESIGNATED FOR OPERATION IRAQI 

3 FREEDOM OR OPERATION ENDURING FREE4 DOM. 

5 (a) MILITARY SERVICES.—The Secretary of Defense 

6 shall pay a one-time bonus of $1,500 to each member of 

7 the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps, including 

8 reserve components thereof, who served or serves for any 

9 period of time in a combat zone designated in connection 

10 with Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation Enduring 

11 Freedom, and whose service is characterized as honorable 

12 by the Secretary. 

13 (b) COAST GUARD.—The Secretary of Homeland Se14 curity shall pay a one-time bonus of $1,500 to each mem15 ber of the Coast Guard or Coast Guard Reserve who 

16 served or serves for any period of time in a combat zone 

17 designated in connection with Operation Iraqi Freedom or 

18 Operation Enduring Freedom, and whose service is char19 acterized as honorable by the Secretary. 

Æ 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

-c.yun 

-- 

‘a. aMus 

Au8M8, Tau 

kWUjlr 

-l-rAmaBax?mmbb48fllll, 

FIRST ASSIS’TA 

ATTORNEY GENEHAL 

madoj