alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Spice Entertainment Companies, Inc. and Subsidiaries, (formerly Graff Pay-Per-
View Inc.) on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-80824, 33-82806, and 33-93534) of our
report, based in part on the report of other auditors dated March 8, 1996 and
April 3, 1996, respectively, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and financial statements Schedule II of Spice Entertainment
Companies, Inc. as of December 31, 1995, and for the two years in the period
ended December 31, 1995, which report is included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.

COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


New York, New York
April 15, 1997
No. 09-9101.

#### Timmie Ford, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1041, 130 S. Ct. 2073,

176 L. Ed. 2d 423,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2810.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 352 Fed. Appx. 916.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4128

_____________________________
M ARK W. B AXLEY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jennie Kinsey , Judge

. March 11, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , R OWE , and M AKAR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Mark W. Baxley, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AMDL, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Arthur S. Rosten,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |                                                                                                                               
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



| |                                                                                                                                                              
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

| |                                                       
| | ------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Arthur S. Rosten                                  
| |                                                       
| | Arthur S. Rosten
Chief Financial Officer
June 30, 2003
STATE v. Cedric Theodis HOBBS, Jr.

263PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 10, 2019

John Keating Wiles, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

Amy Kunstling Irene, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Sterling P. Rozear, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Hobbs, Cedric Theodis (Jr.).

Cedric Theodis Hobbs, Jr., for Hobbs, Cedric Theodis (Jr.).

Donald H. Beskind, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality.

David Weiss, Attorney at Law, for Coalition of State and National Criminal Justice and Civil Rights Advocates.

James E. Coleman, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Coalition of State and National Criminal Justice and Civil Rights Advocates.

Elizabeth Hambourger, Attorney at Law, Durham, for Coalition of State and National Criminal Justice and Civil Rights Advocates.

William R. West, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the amended motion filed on the 8th of July 2019 by Amicus Curiae to admit Robert S. Chang Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of July 2019."
/**
 * @file
 * JavaScript to disable back button.
 */

(function () {

  'use strict';

  // From: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17962130/restrict-user-to-refresh-and-back-forward-in-any-browser
  history.pushState({page: 1}, 'Title 1', '#no-back');
  window.onhashchange = function (event) {
    window.location.hash = 'no-back';
  };

})();
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Fund, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the Report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Funds disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in the Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the period covered by the Report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in the Report any change in the Funds internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Funds most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Funds internal control over
financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the Funds ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Funds internal control over financial reporting.
 By: /s/ Roman GregorigRoman GregorigVice President and Principal Financial OfficerAugust 14, 2007
 E-3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-64,871]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on January 13, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed by a State Workforce office on behalf of workers of Mars Petcare US, Inc., Vernon, California.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of March 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-5182 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
# Attendee Report GoToWebinar

Webinar Name Webinar ID Availability of the Framework Document for Refrigerated Beverage Vending Machines: Public Meeting & Webinar 981336841
Actual Start Date/Time Actual Duration (minutes) Jun 20, 2013 08:42 AM EDT 217 Total Attended 12 

# Session Details First Name Last Name CountryAddress City StateOrganization Zip Code Steven Bouyelas US 225 Apple St. Norco LA 70079 Sean Gouw US 6060 North Irwindale Ave Suite N Azusa CA Southern California Edison91702 James Jenkins US 3020 1st Ave E Newton IA 50208 Christopher Lau US 1200 19th Street, NWWashington DC 20036 Erick Layseca-Flores MX PO Box 57 San Juan Rio Wellington Drive Technologies76800 Laura Nicholson US 1604 Coolidge AvenuePasadena CA 91104 Patrick Powell US 801 Klein Rd Suite 200Plano TX Underwriters Laboratories75074 Susan Sieben US PO Box 4929 Buffalo Grove IL Wellington Drive Technologies60089 Meg Waltner US 111 Sutter Street San Francisco CA 94110 Linda Wilson US 120 Broadway NY NY NYS Office of the Attorney General 10271 Arshak Zakarian US 1610 Harrison St. Oakland CA Energy Solutions 94612 Erick Zehr US 3020 1st Ave E Newton IA UL 50208 

# General Information
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# Wnfteb**~tate~ ~ourt**  

# of**~peaI~** 

# for tbe jf

# eberaI**~frtuft** ALEXANDERS.ORENSHTEYN, Plaintiff-Appellant, 

### v. CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
2011-1308 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in case no. 02-CV-60478, Judge Adalberto Jordan. 

### ON MOTION

ORDER Citrix Systems, Inc. moves for a 14-day extension of time, until December 20, 2012, to file its response brief. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted.ORENSHTEYN V. CITRIX SYSTEMS


## NOV 28 2012 Date

cc: Joseph J. Zito, Esq. Douglas J. Kline, Esq. s21 2
FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk



## u.s.

## COURf~~~PEALS fOR THE**FEDER~.'-** rmCUlT 

## NOV 28 ZU1L JANHORBAlY CLERK
STATE of North Carolina v. Douglas Wayne STANALAND

No. 333P18-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 4, 2019

Douglas Wayne Stanaland, For Stanaland, Douglas Wayne

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of N.C.

Robert S. Banks, District Attorney, For the State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 3rd of September 2019 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Avery County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of September 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd of September 2019 by Defendant for Judicial Review/Writ of Certiorari/Motion to Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of September 2019."
No. 09-7453.

#### Giovanni Sairras, Petitioner v. Jonathan Schleffer, et al.

559 U.S. 1088, 130 S. Ct. 2143,

176 L. Ed. 2d 760,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3129.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1151, 130 S. Ct. 1145, 175 L. Ed. 2d 979, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 650.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo*, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

                    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at                     *www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​*.                

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 16, 2009.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta**                     (Steve Foley, Vice President) 1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:                

*1. Educational Services of America, Inc. and Educational Funding of the South, Inc.*, both of Knoxville, Tennessee, to engage in community development activities, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(12) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 24, 2009.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E9-4205 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Gabriel Mendoza, * From the 161st District Court

of Ector County,

Trial Court No. B-19-0006-CR.

Vs. No. 11-19-00210-CR * April 2, 2020

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., 

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, we modify the judgment of the trial court to change the Time Payment

Fee from $25.00 to $2.50 and affirm the judgment as modified.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 47 (Thursday, March 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5236]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

(A-357-812)


Honey from Argentina: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results 
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 12, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Scott or Robert James, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
2657 or (202) 482-0649, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 30, 2008, the Department of 
Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on honey from 
Argentina for the period December 1, 2006 through November 30, 2007. 
See Honey from Argentina: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review and Intent to Revoke Order in Part, 73 FR 79802 
(December 30, 2008). The current deadline for the final results of this 
review is April 29, 2009.

Extension of Time Limits for Final Results

    Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act), requires the Department to issue the final results of an 
administrative review within 120 days after the date on which the 
preliminary results were published. However, if it is not practicable 
to complete the review within this time period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of 
the Act allows the Department to extend the time limit for the final 
results up to 180 days from the date of publication of the preliminary 
results.
    The Department finds that it is not practicable to complete this 
review within the original time frame due to additional analysis that 
must be performed with respect to respondent Patagonik S.A.'s cost of 
production and sales of subject merchandise. Consequently, and in 
accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.213(h)(2), the Department is fully extending the time limit for 
completion of the final results of this administrative review by 60 
days, to June 28, 2009. As this date falls on a Sunday, the final 
results are due June 29, 2009. See Notice of Clarification: Application 
of ``Next Business Day'' Rule for Administrative Determination 
Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 
(May 10, 2005).
    This notice is published in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 
the Act.

    Dated: March 4, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. E9-5236 Filed 3-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5132

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 

resource study to determine the suitability and feasibility 

of including in the National Park System certain sites 

in Monroe County, Michigan, relating to the Battles of 

the River Raisin during the War of 1812.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5132 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘River Raisin National 

3 Battlefield Study Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY, MONROE COUNTY, 

5 MICHIGAN, SITES RELATING TO BATTLES OF 

6 THE RIVER RAISIN. 

7 (a) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Inte8 rior shall conduct a special resource study of sites in Mon9 roe County, Michigan, relating to the Battles of the River 

10 Raisin on January 18 and 22, 1813, and their aftermath 

11 to determine—

12 (1) the national significance of the sites; and 

13 (2) the suitability and feasibility of including 

14 the sites in the National Park System. 

15 (b) REQUIREMENTS.—The study conducted under 

16 subsection (a) shall include the analysis and recommenda17 tions of the Secretary on—

18 (1) the effect on Monroe County, Michigan, of 

19 including the sites in the National Park System; and 

20 (2) whether the sites could be included in an 

21 existing unit of the National Park System. 

22 (c) CONSULTATION.—In conducting the study under 

23 subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with—

24 (1) appropriate Federal agencies and State and 

25 local government entities; and 

26 (2) interested groups and organizations. 
3

•HR 5132 EH

1 (d) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required under 

2 subsection (a) shall be conducted in accordance with Pub3 lic Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–1 et seq.). 

4 (e) REPORT.—Not later than three years after the 

5 date on which funds are first made available for the study, 

6 the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Resources 

7 of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

8 Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report con9 taining—

10 (1) the findings of the study; and 

11 (2) any conclusions and recommendations of the 

12 Secretary. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 25, 

2006. 

Attest:

Clerk. 
109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5132

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct 

Raisin during the War of 1812.Michigan, relating to the Battles of the River Park System certain sites in Monroe County, ability and feasibility of including in the National a special resource study to determine the suit-
<SEQUENCE>3
<FILENAME>c03925exv32.txt
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
        OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report (as defined under the preceding Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, Peter Lamoureux,
President of Everest Asset Management, Inc. , the general partner of the Everest
Fund, L.P. (the "Fund"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Fund.


                                        By: /s/ Peter Lamoureux
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name: Peter Lamoureux
                                        Title: Director, President and Treasurer
                                        April 1, 2013
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7111

WARWICK HARRELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairwoman for the Virginia

Parole Board,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District

Judge. (CA-04-379-2)

Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 22, 2004

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Warwick Harrell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Warwick Harrell appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find

that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harrell v.

Fahey, No. CA-04-379-2 (E.D. Va. filed June 29, 2004; entered June

30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32

Written Statement of Co-Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Co-Chief Executive Officers and the Chief Financial Officer of Regal Entertainment Group, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
each hereby certifies that, to his/her knowledge on the date hereof:



| |  | /s/MICHAEL L. CAMPBELLMichael L. Campbell
Co-Chief Executive Officer
May 10, 2005
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/KURT C. HALLKurt C. Hall
Co-Chief Executive Officer
May 10, 2005              
| |  | /s/AMY E. MILESAmy E. Miles
Chief Financial Officer
May 10, 2005                 

---



QuickLinks