alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Raj Rao/RTP/USEPA/US 

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> 

Cc: Anna Wood/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Howard Hoffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Paul Balserak/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Lisa Sutton/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 08/06/2010 04:01 PM 

Subject: Revised SIP call draft 

Hi Christine, 

Attached is our latest draft of the SIP call file incorporating many of OMB's edits. This also includes the 

agreed upon biogenic language and the additional SIP Fix write-up language that I also sent you 

separately. I am also attaching a Compare with your Redline document and hope it is easy to track the

changes. Unfortunately we ran out of time, to do a crosswalk of changes but i hope the compare 

document will help speed up review. 

Please note that EPA is also doing a concurrent last-minute review of this final draft but we 

wanted to get this to you asap. The FIP rule will follow shortly. 

 

GHG SIP Call Proposal_8-6-2010.doc SIP Call_redline_8-6_to_8-5-fromOMB.doc 

Thanks so much for your patience and help. Please let me know if you want to have a call. 

raj 

Raj Rao, P.E. 

Group Leader, NSRG 

OAQPS/AQPD(MD- C504-03) 

109 TW Alexander Drive 

RTP, NC 27709 

919-541-5344 

919-541-5509 fax 

Note: Positions or views expressed here do not represent official EPA policy. Interagency deliberative 

and Confidential.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Samuel Abraham, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 873]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gorges, J.), rendered April 29, 1998, convicting him of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant argues that the Supreme Court erred when it tried the case to its conclusion in his absence. However, the defendant failed to return to court, although he was warned of *634the consequences of such a failure, and he had been permitted to delay or adjourn the proceedings on several prior occasions. The court, upon inquiry into and consideration of all appropriate factors, providently exercised its discretion in trying the defendant in absentia *(see, People v Sanchez,*65 NY2d 436; *People v Parker,*57 NY2d 136; *People v Cajigas,*240 AD2d 755; *People v Taylor,*233 AD2d 534). Ritter, J. P., Altman, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
In the MATTER OF: M.Y.-F.H., Y.K.-M.A., K.J.Y.H.

No. COA18-1180

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 18, 2019

AFFIRMED.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 24, 2024 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-24-00574-CV 

MPT OF HIGHLAND VILLAGE FCER, LLC, MPT OF LITTLE ELM 

FCER, LLC AND MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC., Appellants 

V. 

ER OF TEXAS, LLC, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-24-03218 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Molberg, Miskel, and Breedlove 

Opinion by Justice Miskel 

Before the Court is appellants’ July 18, 2024 agreed motion to dismiss this 

appeal. In the motion, appellants inform the Court they have resolved its differences 

with appellee and request that we dismiss the appeal. We grant appellants’ motion 

and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). 

 

240574F.P05 

 

/Emily Miskel/

EMILY MISKEL 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

MPT OF HIGHLAND VILLAGE 

FCER, LLC, MPT OF LITTLE ELM 

FCER, LLC AND MEDICAL 

PROPERTIES TRUST, INC., 

Appellants 

No. 05-24-00574-CV V. 

ER OF TEXAS, LLC, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 134th Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-24-03218. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Miskel. 

Justices Molberg and Breedlove 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal. 

Judgment entered July 24, 2024
STATE v. Kenneth Vernon GOLDER

79PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 5, 2019

Anne Bleyman, Attorney at Law, for Golder, Kenneth Vernon.

Michael T. Henry, Assistant Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 4th of June 2019 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of June 2019."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 10th day of July 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
May 29, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KEVIN DEWAYNE WALTON, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00875-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard ON REMAND from the Court of Criminal Appeals 

on the transcript of the record of the court below. The record reveals no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment be AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### Horace E. HILL et al., Appellants, v. James HUGER et al., Appellees.

No. 21800.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

May 11, 1965.

Horace E. Hill, Daytona Beach, Fla., for appellants.

Melvin Orfinger, Charles Tindell, Joseph W. Hatchett, Daytona Beach, Fla., for appellees.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS* and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

*

 Senior Circuit Judge of the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

This was a bill in equity asserting that the City of Daytona Beach, Florida, was about to enter into contracts with the Housing and Home Finance Agency of the United States for participation in the Federal Urban Renewal Program; that the City Council of the City of Daytona was illegally constituted in that it was made up of five representatives from five representative districts which were not apportioned according to population. It sought an injunction to prevent the completion of the Urban Renewal Program or any condemnation of property of the appellants or the class they represent until a legally constituted city government was in office. It having'been made to appear to the trial court that the Circuit Court of Volusia County, Florida, had entered a decree holding that the City Council of Daytona Beach, Florida, was unconstitutionally malapportioned and that that Court had permitted the present City Council to continue in office through its present term which expires with the elections to be held in October of this, year, and that the appellants here had appealed from the refusal of the said state court to enjoin the appellees from further proceeding with the Urban Renewal Program, the district court dismissed this action.

It appearing that the state court has now in an unappealed order held that the city government of Daytona Beach will not have valid existence following *128the expiration of the present terms of the City Councilmen, and no provision having been made for time or means by which this situation can be corrected other than the fact that the state legislature now in session has the power to pass corrective legislation, we conclude that the dismissal of the complaint was improper in as much as the appellants have the right to have the court retain jurisdiction until a legally constituted city government shall have been constituted. It is, of course, entirely appropriate for the district court to stay its hand pending final disposition of the present appeal by the appellants in their state court litigation unless it should be made to appear to the trial court that constitutional rights of the appellants will be seriously jeopardized in the absence of more specific determinations by the trial court of the time and manner in which the city government may be brought within constitutionally acceptable standards.

The order of dismissal is vacated and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the views expressed herein.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-65,299] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 19, 2009 in response to a petition filed by the United Steelworkers of America, Local 1299 on behalf of workers of United States Steel Great Lakes Works, Ecorse, Michigan. 

The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition (TA-W-64,773) filed on December 19, 2008 that is the subject of an ongoing investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued. Further investigation in this case would duplicate efforts and serve no purpose; therefore the investigation under this petition has been terminated. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 24th day of February 2009. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E9-5048 Filed 3-9-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Mark Edwin JONES

No. 207P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Mark L. Hayes, Attorney at Law, For Jones, Mark Edwin

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina

Melody R. Hairston, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina

Ashley Welch, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th of June 2019 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
No. 09-9237.

#### Tyheem Keesh and Jesus Jova, Petitioners v. Joseph T. Smith, Superintendent, Shawangunk Correctional Facility, et al.

559 U.S. 1077, 130 S. Ct. 2111,

176 L. Ed. 2d 739,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3471.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 582 F.3d 410 and 346 Fed. Appx. 741.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tornado Gold International Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Earl W.
Abbott, President (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

  (1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.



August 22, 2005           By:  /s/ Earl W. Abbott
                               ------------------------------------------------
                               Earl W. Abbott
                               President (principal executive officer) and Chief
                               Financial Officer
Michael T. WALLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 79771

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Filed: January 9, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 27, 2018 Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 3, 2018

Michael T. Waller c/o Leilia McDowekl, Kansas City, Appellant pro se.

Karen L. Kramer, Jefferosn City, for respondent.

Before Division Three: Lisa White Hardwick, P.J., and Victor C. Howard and Alok Ahuja, JJ.

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM:

*702Following a bench trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Appellant Michael Waller was convicted of property damage in the first degree in violation of § 569.100, RSMo. The circuit court found Waller to be a persistent offender, and sentenced him to three years' imprisonment. Following the affirmance of his conviction on direct appeal, Waller filed a motion for post-conviction relief, which was amended by his appointed counsel. The circuit court denied relief following an evidentiary hearing. Waller appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).
Sunaina S. GLAIZE v. Samuel G. GLAIZE

No. 333P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 29, 2019

Sunaina S. Glaize, for Glaize, Sunaina S.

Samuel Greer Glaize, for Glaize, Samuel G.

*348***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 25th of August 2019 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 26th of August 2019 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Wake County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 26th of August 2019 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 26th of August 2019 by Plaintiff in this matter for writ of prohibition of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of August 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of August 2019 by Plaintiff to Disqualify Clerk, Daniel M. Horne:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of August 2019."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6475] 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects in the exhibition: “Cast in Bronze: French Sculpture from Renaissance to Revolution,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about February 24, 2009, until on or about May 24, 2009; The J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles, CA, from on or about June 30, 2009, until on or about September 27, 2009, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: (202-453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

Dated: December 30, 2008. 

C. Miller Crouch, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-55 Filed 1-6-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00306

- CV

Dr. Rolando Posada

v. Dr. Juan M. Garcia
On Appeal from the 445th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2011

- DCL

- 5265

- I

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered th is cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be DISMISSED . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

Octobe r 30, 2014
Office *of the* Director *of*  National Intelligence
 
 
 HOME GLOBAL TRENDS REPORT FIVE-YEAR REGIONAL OUTLOOKS  | DEEPER LOOKS MEDIA & DOWNLOADS
 Print
			
		
	
	
		
								Menu Show/Hide
INTRODUCTION
Foreword
Key Themes
Executive Summary
The COVID Factor: Expanding Uncertainty
STRUCTURAL FORCES
Structural Forces: Setting the Parameters
Demographics and Human Development
Future Global Health Challenges
Environment
Economics
Technology
EMERGING DYNAMICS
Emerging Dynamics: Societal, State, and International
Societal: Disillusioned, Informed, and Divided
State: Tensions, Turbulence, and Transformation
International: More Contested, Uncertain, and Conflict Prone
The Future of Terrorism: Diverse Actors, Fraying International Efforts
SCENARIOS FOR 2040
Scenarios for 2040: Charting the Future Amid Uncertainty
Renaissance of Democracies
A World Adrift
Competitive Coexistence
Separate Silos
Tragedy and Mobilization
REGIONAL FORECASTS
20-year Projections
Latin America
Europe
Russia and Eurasia
Middle East & North Africa
Sub-Saharan Africa
South Asia
North East Asia
South East Asia
Oceania
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Acknowledgements
**REGIONAL FORECASTS**
SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA
*(SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA - Click image to enlarge)*
 Officeof the DirectorofNational Intelligence


Contact ODNI

          ODNI Centers
National Counterterrorism CenterNational Counterintelligence and Security CenterNational Counterproliferation and Biosecurity CenterCyber Threat Intelligence Integration CenterForeign Malign Influence Center

           Oversight
Equal Employment OpportunityIC Inspector GeneralIC Diversity Equity Inclusion and AccessibilityCivil Liberties, Privacy, and TransparencyOffice of General CounselMore Offices

          Information
IC IG HotlineNo FEAR ActPrivacy PolicyCustomer ServiceAccessibilityFOIASystem of Record Notices

          Useful Links
For KidsReady.govOpen.govFlu.govPlain Language ActODNI Operating StatusCoronavirus Disease GuidanceAdobe Acrobat Reader
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Kris
G. Radhakrishnan, Chief Financial Officer of American Achievement Group Holding
Corp., ACC Group Holding Corp. and American Achievement Corporation (the
“Companies”), hereby certify that:





(1) The
Quarterly Report of the Companies on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November
29, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.





Date:
January 13, 2009





/s/
      KRIS G. RADHAKRISHNANName:
            
            Kris
      G. RadhakrishnanTitle:
            
            Chief
      Financial Officer(principal
      financial officer)
#### Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, a Corporation, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Lollie V. Alverson, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed January 26, 1928.

*74*W. E. Kay, Alexander Akerman*and W. *B. Crawford,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Maguire <& Voorhis,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

The writ of error was taken to a judgment awarding $20,000.00 damages for alleged personal injuries.

In all eases “the evidence should in probative force not only preponderate in favor of the verdict found, but the evidence should produce in the minds of the jury a reasonable belief of the facts essential to the verdict. ’ ’ Escambia County Light and Power Co. v. Sutherland, 61 Fla. 167, text 194, 55 So. Rep. 83; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Royal Palm Soap Co., 80 Fla. 800, 86 So. Rep. 835. And a trial court should not sustain a verdict when it is not in accord with the manifest weight of the evidence or with the justice of the ease. Shultz v. Pacific Ins. Co., 14 Fla. 73, text 94; Miller v. White, 23 Fla. 301, 2 So. Rep. 614; Meinhard v. Mode, 25 Fla. 181, 5 So. 672; Tampa Water Works Co. v. Mugge, 60 Fla. 263, 53 So. 943.

It is peculiarly the province of the jury to pass upon the credibility of conflicting testimony and to determine the probative force of competent testimony; but the legal effect of the evidence is a matter of law and the trial court should *75grant a new trial when there is difficulty in reconciling the verdict with the manifest weight of the evidence and of the justice of the case. Tampa Electric Co. v. Barber, 81 Fla. 405, text 406-7, 88 So. 302.

The evidence as to the nature and extent of the personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff below as alleged is so unconvincing and the amount of the verdict is so grossly excessive as to warrant a conclusion that the jury were not governed by the evidence. In such a case the judgment will be reversed. See Railroad Company v. Brash, 73 Fla. 478, 503; Fla. Railroad Co. v. Gensler, 14 Fla. 122; Pensacola Sanitarium v. Wilkins, 64 Fla. 407, 60 So. 128; Jacksonville Electric Co. v. Dillon, 67 Fla. 114, 64 So. 669; Southern Utilities Co. v. Davis, 83 Fla. 366, 92 So. 683.

Reversed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Brown, J. J., concur. ,