alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# MDE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard

- Baltimore MD 21230 410-537-3000

- 1-800-633-6101- www.mde.state.md.us
Martin O'Malley Governor Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. Anthony G. Brown Lieutenant Governor July 15,2011
Mr. ShawnM. Garvin Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region III 1650 Arch Street (3RAOO) Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 Dear Mr. Garvin: Secretary Kathy M. Kinsey Deputy Secretary

The purpose ofthis letter is to supplement the State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision #11-01 submitted to your office onMay 13, 2011 concerning amendments adopted to clarify requirements for electric generating stations. That SIP revision request included subsection 7-208(f) ofthe Public Utility Companies Article of the Maryland Code-Inclusion of federal andState environmental laws andstandards in the certificate- governing issuance ofCertificates ofPublic Convenience andNecessity by the Public Services Commission (the Commission). That subsection states: (1) The Commission shall include in each certificate it issues under subsection (e) of this section: (i) the requirements of thefederal andState environmental laws and standards that are identifiedby the Department of the Environment; and (ii) the methods andconditions that the Commission determines are appropriate to comply with those environmental1aws andstandards. (2) The Commission may notadopt any methodor condition under paragraph (1)(ii) of this subsection that the Department of the Environment determines is inconsistentwith federal andState environmental laws and standards. Therefore, prior to the Commission implementing the provisions ofeither Code ofMaryland Regulations (COMAR) 20.79.01.07 (Waivers and Modifications) or COMAR 20.79.02.03.C (Phased Proceedings Requests), the Maryland Department ofthe Environment, pursuant to**~** Recycled Paper www.mde.state.md.us TTY Users 1·800-735-2258 ViaMaryland Relay ServiceMr. Shawn M. Garvin Page 2 July 

### 15,2011
subsection 

### 7-208(f), above, will ensure thatno waivers, modifications orphased applications are issued or accepted that do not comply withthe all applicable**require~ents** ofthe federal Clean Air Act and federal regulations. Ifyou have any questions concerning this SIP revision submittal, please feel free to call me at 

### (410) 537-3084 or Mr. George (Tad) Aburn, Jr., Director ofthe Air and Radiation Management Administration at 

### (410) 537-3255. Sincerely, 

# 1tM4-----
Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. Secretary
cc: George (Tad) Aburn, Jr., Director, Air and Radiation Management Administration

### ~ Recycled Paper www.mde.state.md.us TTY Users 1-800-735-2258 ViaMaryland Relay Scn'ice
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF PERIODIC REPORT





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  each of
the  undersigned  officers  of  Magnitude
Information Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies that:





1.   The
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the Year ended December 31, 2008
(the "Report")  fully complies with
the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C.  78m or 78o(d)); and





2.   The
information  contained in the Report
fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:   April
      14, 2009/s/ Rudolf HaukeChief
      Executive Officer/s/ Joerg H. KlaubeChief
      Financial Officer





This
certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
STATE of North Carolina v. Carlos SINCLAIR

No. 62P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Thomas J. Campbell, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Mark Montgomery, Attorney at Law, for Sinclair, Carlos.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th of February 2019 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


         We consent to the incorporation of our report dated November 8 2001,
on the financial statements of Heartsoft, Inc. (the "Company") at June 30,
2001, and March 31, 2000, and the three month period ended June 30, 2000,
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30,
2001, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8
(File No. 33-23138D).


/s/ TULLIUS TAYLOR SARTAIN & SARTAIN LLP

Tulsa, Oklahoma
November 12, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          26,937
<SECURITIES>                                    44,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               158,062
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 158,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           80,632
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           157
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,273
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   158,062
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,269
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               326,080
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,671
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,269
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (312,482)      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (312,482)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,264]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 17, 2009, in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Auto Truck Transport, Mount Holly, North Carolina Terminal, Mount Holly, North Carolina.

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC this 4th day of March 2009.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-5187 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Generations Bancshares, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on  Form  10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the  undersigned,  who  are  the  Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief Financial
Officer,  respectively,  of  the  Company,  hereby  each  certify  as  follows:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

/s/  David  K.  George
-----------------------------------------------
David  K.  George,  President
(Principal  Executive  Officer)


/s/ Nita Elliot
-----------------------------------------------
Nita Elliot
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

May 13, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       18
<PAGE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1823-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Oklahoma (FEMA-1823-DR), dated February 17, 2009, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         February 25, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Oklahoma is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of February 17, 2009.

Comanche, Haskell, McIntosh, Muskogee, Okfuskee, and Sequoyah Counties for Public Assistance.

                        (The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance                               ( print page 10605)                            (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)                    

Nancy Ward,

Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E9-5233 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Flight Cycles

LNG LNG Type

Fuel

Missn ID Aircraft Cycle ID PreVolt PostVolt tlog File

Flight Number

Date T/O
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-104517, 333-105625, No. 333-106611, No.
333-110161, No. 333-111563, No. 333-92058, No. 333-69052, No. 333-72964, No. 333-48680, No. 333-36925 and No. 333-31217) and the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-106865 pertaining to the 1999 Incentive and Reward Plan, as amended and other
option agreements named therein, and No. 333-118842 pertaining to the 2004 Equity Participation Plan) of Aphton Corporation and in the related Prospectuses, of our report dated April 29, 2005, with respect to Aphton Corporation managements
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Aphton Corporation, included in this Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004.



| |  |                             
| |  | ----------------------------
| |  | /s/Ernst & Young LLP        
| |  | Certified Public Accountants



May 2, 2005

Fort Lauderdale, Florida
No. 09-10019.

#### In re Kim McMullen, Petitioner.

559 U.S. 1091, 130 S. Ct. 2395,

176 L. Ed. 2d 786,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3650.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of ha-beas corpus denied.
November 11, 2015 

Dear Mr. Mishak: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket 

No. FAA-2015-3472). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) to process your petition. 

Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the 

requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking 

number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process 

your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 11/24/15. If we do 

not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999. 

Sincerely, 

/S/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 97-10853

Summary Calendar

_______________________

LLOYD EDWIN HUMPHREYS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; 

BUREAU OF PRISONS; PATRICIA 

SHINGLES, Community Corrections 

Manager; DONCELLA MILTON, 

Director of Community Corrections Ctr.,

Respondents-Appellees.

______________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:94-CV-160-T

______________________________________________

March 27, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
1See Ojo v. I.N.S., 106 F.3d 680 (5th Cir. 1997). 

2Sinclair v. State, 679 F.2d 513 (5th Cir. 1982). 

2

Lloyd Edwin Humphreys appeals the dismissal of his petition and motion

challenging the calculation of hisrelease date from federal custody under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241, collaterally challenging his conviction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and seeking

issuance of a writ of error coram nobis. 

Humphreys was convicted in a trial before the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Iowa. The court à quo lacked jurisdiction over the §

2255 claims.1 Similarly, a writ of error corum nobis “can only issue to aid the

jurisdiction of the court in which the conviction was had.”2 Accordingly, the trial

court did not err in dismissing these claims.

Humphreys contends that the district court improperly determined that his

§ 2241 petition was moot. He was sentenced to a three-year term of probation

commencing on the date of his release from confinement. He was so released on

February 4, 1994. Obviously more than three years have passed since that date and

Humphreys no longer suffers from any collateral consequences resulting from the

calculation of his release date. Therefore there is no case or controversy before the

court. The § 2241 petition is moot and there was no error in its dismissal.
3Ellis v. Lynaugh, 873 F.2d 830 (5th Cir. 1989) (§ 2254 case). 

3

Humphreys contends that the district court erred in dismissing his action

without holding a hearing. An evidentiary hearing is not required when the record

is complete or in those instances in which the petitioner raises only legal claims

that can be resolved without the presentation of additional evidence.3 There is no

dispute regarding Humphreys’s actual release date or the length of his term of

probation. Only legal issues are presented. Because Humphreys’s § 2241 petition

was moot and the district court lacked jurisdiction over the § 2255 and coram nobis

claims, no hearing was required.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Willamette Valley Vineyards,
Inc.'s, Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-69188) of our report on
the audit of the financial statements of Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc., as
of December 31, 2006, and for the two years then ended. Our report is dated
April 2, 2007, and appears in Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc.'s Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ Moss Adams LLP

Santa Rosa, California
April 2, 2007
STATE v. Barbara Jean MYERS-MCNEIL

453P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Michelle F. Lynch, GAL Appellate Counsel, For Myers-McNeil, Barbara Jean

Christine Wright, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina

Heidi E. Reiner, Assistant Appellate Defender, For Myers-McNeil, Barbara Jean

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th of January 2019 by State of NC to Deem Response Timely Filed:

*88"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. § 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                                              |                           |                                                                                          |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                              |                           |
|                                         |                      |                                                                                     |
| Date: May              22,              2006 | By:                  | /s/ David                C.                Levy                 Name: David C. Levy |
|                                              | Title: Chief Executive Officer |
|                                              |                           |

|                                                    |                                                                                  |                                              |
|---------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                    |                                                                                  |
|                                               |                                                                             |                                         |
| Date: May              22,              2006  | By:                                                                         | /s/ John              W.              Poling |
|                                                    | Name:              John W. Poling                                                     |
|                                                    | Title:              Executive Vice President and Chief              Financial Officer |

----
TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT: 

ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM 

FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT: 

High-Intensity Discharge Lamps 

Analysis of Potential Energy Savings 

Docket #: EE-DET-03-001 

June 2010 

U.S. Department of Energy 

Assistant Secretary 

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 

Building Technologies Program 

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards 

Washington, DC 20585
Curtis D. BRADLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 79739

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: October 31, 2017 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied December 14, 2017

S. Kathleen (Kate) Webber, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Division One: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, and James Edward Welsh and Karen King Mitchell, Judges

**Order**

Per Curiam:

Curtis Bradley appeals, following an evidentiary hearing, the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Bradley argues that his trial counsel was ineffective in: (1) failing to renew a request to strike hearsay testimony; (2) eliciting testimony from the investigating officer that he had obtained information about Bradley from the police department's record management system; and (3) failing to object when the investigating officer testified that he terminated the interview with Bradley after Bradley invoked his right to remain silent. Finding no error of law, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).