p

t ofTransportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Petition ofMBVideoDrone for an Exemption Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of2012 

Director: Flight Standards Service: 

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012 ("Reform Act") and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, MBVideoDrone ("Petitioner") hereby applies for an exemption from the Federal Aviation Regulations ("FARs") identified below to allow commercial operation of small unmanned aerial vehicles (i.e., "small unmanned aircraft" or "UAS") for the purpose of conducting aerial photography, videography, and inspections for residential, commercial real 

property and construction projects for the real estate and construction industries. 

This petition for exemption is made based on information outlined in this Petition for Exemption, 

as well as the accompanying Petitioner documents; 

1. PIC Flight Operations Manual and; 

2. Operations Manuals 

(Collectively 2 and 3 are referred to as "Docwnents & Manuals") 3. User Guide and; 

4. Flight Manual' 

(Collectively 3 and 4 are referred to as "Manufacturer's Manuals") 

Petitioner submits these supporting materials as confidential documents pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.35(b ), as the materials contain confidential commercial and/or proprietary information that Petitioner has not and will not share with other requesting parties. Additionally, these documents contain operating conditions and procedures that are not generally available to the public and are protected from release under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 et. seq .. NOTE: ALL ATTACHMENTS SET FORTH IN SUPPORT OF THIS LETTER OF 

PETITION ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND SHALL NOT BE RELEASED TO THE 

PUBLIC WITHOUT WRITIEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE PETITIONER. 

For your convenience, this Petition is organized as follows: 

1

• The term "Manufacturer's Manual" also includes all relevant manufacturer publications, including, but not limited to: operations and flight manuals, user guides, component maintenance manuals, pilot training manuals, service information letters and, safety/service bulletins. 
DI. Relevant Statutory Authority 

IV. Petitioner's Proposed UAS Operations Meet the Requirements of 

Section 333 Of the Reform Act 

A. Approval is Warranted Based on the UAS's Size, Weight, Speed, and 

Operational Capability 

B. Approval is Warranted Based on the Operational Restrictions Set Forth in the 

Operations Manuals 

V. Regulations From Which Exemption is Requested 

A. 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H - Airworthiness Certificates and 14 C.F.R. § 

91.203(a)(1) 

B. 14 C.F.R. Part 27 Airworthiness Standards: Normal Category Rotorcraft 

C. 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.9(c), 45.23(b) and 45.27(a): Aircraft Marking and 

Identification Requirements 

D. 14 C.F.R. § 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(l) and (2); 91.417(a) and (b): 

Maintenance Inspections 

E. 14 C.F.R. Part 61, 14 C.F.R. § 61.3, 14 C.F.R. § 61.113: Private Pilot 

Privileges and Limitations 

F. 14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a): Civil Aircraft Airworthiness 

G. 14 C.F.R. § 91.9(b)(2): Civil Aircraft Flight Manual in the Aircraft and 14 

C.F.R. § 91.203(a) and (b): Carrying Civil Aircraft Certification and 

Registration 

H. 14 C.F.R. § 91.103: Preflight Action 

I. 14 C.F.R. § 91.1 09{a): Flight Instruction 

J. 14 C.F.R. § 91.119(c): Minimum Safe Altitudes 

K. 14 C.F.R. § 91.121: Altimeter Settings 

L. 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions 

Vl. Drug and Alcohol Program 

VD. Public Interest VDI. Privacy 

IX. Federal Register Summary 

X. Conclusion 

I. DESCRIPTION OF PETITIONER 

Petitioner is based in Palmdale, CA working in aerial photography, videography, and inspections 

for residential, commercial real property and construction projects for the real estate and 

construction industries. The Company specializes in, and will continue to focus on the 
videography and inspection of real property and construction sites. 

Petitioner's staff are well trained and experienced in providing support as visual observers 

("VO") for the pilot in command ("PIC') in addition to any other needed on site assistance. 

All of the equipment owned by Petitioner is of the highest quality gear and has been able to 

provide these services safely and without any claims or incident. Petitioner's goal is to advise 

the perspective client that Petitioner is following all the applicable state and federal rules to 

ensure the safety of the public while providing the client with a competitive and cost effective 

product. 

Petitioner seeks an exemption to allow for photography, videography and other related media 

products. 

The contact information for Petitioner is as follows: 

Mark Barrows 

MBVideoDrone 

38734 174111 Street E. 

Palmdale, CA 93591 

Phone: 818.836.4828: Email: cal64kid@gmail.com 

II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED OPERATION 

Petitioner seeks an exemption pursuant to Section 333 of the Refonn Act to operate the Yuneec 

Q500 4k (referred to MB-UAS) (under 5Slbs) for the proposed operations discussed herein 

below. All UAS operations will occur under tightly controlled conditions on private property or 

approved location where Petitioner has received verifiable permission to operate from the 

landowner, controller or authorized representative. The proposed UAS operations will be 

conducted in accordance with the conditions and limitations of this Petition for Exemption and 

Petitioner's Operations Manuals. As detailed in Petitioner's Operations Manuals, all UAS 

operations will be limited to daytime VFR conditions, within visual line-of-sight ("VLOS") of 

the operator, in uncontrolled airspace, and will occur at least 5 nm away from an airport 

reference point. Moreover, Petitioner's Operations Manuals incorporate redundant safeguards to 

assure the aircraft does not travel outside the controlled area ofUAS operations, including GPS 

"geo-fencing" technologies. 

A. Aerial Videography, Photography and Inspection 

Petitioner seeks to use small MB-UAS for the purpose of conducting aerial photography, 

videography and inspection for the real estate and construction industry. Petitioner has 
• Raven Executive (Exemption No. 12639) 

All UAS photography, videography and inspection operations will occur on private property or 

approved location in a controlled area away from spectators and persons not involved in the 

recording process. In addition, the filming will be conducted between dawn and dusk to ensure 

maximum safety for the public and those involved in the manipulation and operation of the UAS; 

VFR conditions, at altitudes below 400' above ground level ("AGL"). 

As set forth below, Petitioner's operations provide an equivalent level of safety which is superior 

to performing the same work using conventional fixed-wing aircraft or helicopters. 

Small UAS video production is also safer than traditional manned aircraft performing the same 

function. Videographer-inspectors also frequently need to climb rooftops, trees, ladders or 

otherwise perform elevated work, which exposes them to the risk of dangerous falls, 

electrocution or other work related injuries. In addition, depending on the nature of the video 

needed and inspection, proximity to equipment, and other mechanical hazards associated with 

industrial sites and construction facilities often involves a risk of exposure to hazardous 

conditions. The use ofMB-UAS mitigates these hazards and is ultimately a much safer and 

cost efficient method of performing these and most other types of inspections. 

Moreover, conventional operations using rotorcraft and fixed-wing aircraft in low level 

operations present risks associated with vehicles weighing tens of thousands of pounds 

(including payload) and carrying large amounts of fuel which inherently presents significant fire 

hazards as well as exposure to other chemical contaminates. It is important to note the use of 

small UAS in this area will not only be safer and more cost effective to the perspective user or 

purchaser of the service, but the quality and expanse of acquired information will be far more 

robust given the low cost associated with its acquisition and other potential consumers an 

inexpensive product. 

UAS video production is more reliable, and allows for the collection, dissemination, and storage 

of visual and other sensory data with greater precision and duration at a very low cost. Small 

UASs will also be capable of accessing and inspecting areas that would otherwise be inaccessible 

or highly dangerous using conventional aircraft or other inspection methods. 

III. RELEVANT STATUTORY AUTHORITY 

This Petition for Exemption is submitted pursuant to Section 333(a) through (c) of the 

FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 ("Reform Act"). Congress has directed the FAA 

"to safely accelerate the integration of civil unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace 

system." Pursuant to Section 333 of the Reform Act, the FAA Administrator is to permit 

unmanned aircraft systems to operate in the National Airspace Systems ("NAS") where it is safe 

to do so based on the following considerations: 
exemption is in the public interest. See 49 U.S.C. § 106(f) (defining the authority of the 

Administrator); 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f) (permitting exemptions from§§ 44701(a), (b) and 

§ § 44 702 - 44 716, et seq.). A party requesting an exemption must explain the reasons why the 

exemption: (1) would benefit the public as a whole, and (2) would not adversely affect safety (or 

how it would provide a level of safety at least equal to the existing rules). See 14 C.F.R. § 11.81 

(petitions for exemption). 

IV. PETmONER'S PROPOSED MB-UAS OPERATIONS MEET THE 

REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 333 OF THE REFORM ACT 

The small MB-UAS operations proposed by Petitioner as noted above in this Petition for 

Exemption qualify for expedited approval pursuant to Section 333 of the Reform Act as each of 

the statutory criteria and relevant factors are satisfied. 

A. Approval is Warranted Based on the UAS's Weight, Speed, and 

Operational Capability 

A Grant of Exemption is appropriate for operations conducted using the UASs due to their size 

weight, speed, and operational capability. 

• The MB-UAS utilized by Petitioner has been approved for use in prior Section 

333 Grants of Exemption from the FAA.2 

• The MB-UAS weighs less than 55 pounds, including payload 

• The MB-UAS will not be flown at a ground speed in excess of87 knots (1 00 

mph). The exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to 

determine compliance with the 87 knot speed restriction. 

• Altitude information will be generated by equipment on board the UAS as 

specified using GPS triangulation, digitally encoded barometric altimeter, radio 

altimeter, or any combination thereof. This information will be transmitted to the pilot 

via telemetric data feed. 

• The MB-UAS will have system redundancies and independent functionality to 

ensure the overall safety and predictability of the system. If connection to the remote 

2 See e.g., Grant of Exemption to Trudeau, Realtor® (Exemption No. 11138); Grant of Exemption to Alon 

Sicherman (Exemption No. 11728); Grant of Exemption to Soko1er Medly (Exemption No. 11341 ). 
UAS is 2.4 GHz frequency bands. 

If the same operations were conducted using a helicopter, the aircraft's take-off weight would 

likely exceed 6,000 pounds depending on payload. The difference in weight between the MBUAS and a helicopter significantly reduces the potential hann to the participating and nonparticipating individuals and/or surrounding property in the event of an unintended accident or 

incident. In addition, the risk to the onboard pilot and camera operator is eliminated. 

B. Approval is Warranted Based on the Operational Restrictions Set Forth in 

Petitioner's Operations Manuals 

Petitioner's Operations Manuals and the Manufacturer's Manual for the selected MB-UAS will 

contain all the procedures and limitations necessary to safely and successfully perform the 

operations specified in this Petition for Exemption. To assist the FAA in making a safety 

assessment of Petitioner's proposed operations, below is a summary of operational limitations 

and conditions that Petitioner will adhere to, and which will ensure an equivalent or higher level 

of safety to operations conducted under current regulatory guidelines: 

1. The MB-UAS weighs less than 55 pounds, with payload. 

2. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with 

verifiable permission from the land owner/controller or authorized representative. 

Permission from land owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained 

for each scheduled flight prior to operation. 

3. All UASs operated under the Grant of Exemption will be identified by serial number, 

registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification (N-Number) 

markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings will be as large as 

practicable. 

4. Minimum crew for each flight operation will consist of a pilot, who will be Pilot-in 

Command ("PIC") of the MB-UAS, and one or more Visual Observers ("Observer") 

as necessary to safely conduct the mission. 

5. PICs shall possess either a private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate. The PIC 

must also hold a current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver's 

license issued by a state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a 

possession, or the Federal government. The PIC will also meet the flight review 

requirements specified in 14 C.F.R 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on 

his or her pilot certificate. 
8. Electronic messaging or texting will not be permitted during flight operations. 

9. The additional requirements identified in the Grant of Exemption shall be added to 

the Petitioner's Operations Manuals. The Operations Manuals will be maintained and 

made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the 

conditions and limitations in the Grant of Exemption and Petitioner's Operations 

Manuals, the conditions and limitations in the Grant of Exemption shall take 

precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, Petitioner shall follow the procedures 

outlined in their Operations Manuals. 

1 0. Petitioner may update or revise its Operations Manuals. Revisions will be tracked and 

a revised copy of the Manual will be provided to the Administrator upon request. 

Petitioner will also present an updated and revised Operations Manuals if it petitions 

for extension or amendment to its Grant of Exemption. If an update or revision would 

affect the basis upon which the FAA grants the exemption, Petitioner will seek an 

amendment to its Grant of Exemption. Petitioner will contact the FAA's UAS 

Integration Office (AFS-80) if questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the 

operating documents. 

11. Petitioner Operations Manuals and its Grant of Exemption will be available to the 

PIC at the ground control station anytime the MB-UAS is operating. 

12. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a MB-UAS flight unless (considering wind and 

forecast weather conditions) there is enough power to fly to the first intended point of 

landing, and assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 10 minutes. 

13. Maximum total flight time for each operational flight using the MB-UAS will be 

limited to 40 minutes or the amount of time the UAS can be flown and still maintain a 

reserve battery power of no less than 25%, whichever occurs first. 

14. Flights will be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feetAGL and will never 

enter navigable controlled airspace without timely prior written authorization and 

approval from the FAA. In the event the structure being inspected exceeds 400 feet 

AGL, the UAS will not be operated more than 100 feet above the highest point on the 

structure, and no more than 50 feet horizontally from the structure. 

15. Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating 

persons. (persons other than the PIC, VO, operator trainees or essential persons), 

vessels, vehicles, and structures unless: 
b. The aircraft is operated near vessels, vehicles or structures where the 

owner/controller of such vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission 

and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to 

those objects and determined that it does not present an undue hazard, and; 

c. Operations nearer to the PIC, VO, operator trainees or essential persons do not 

present an undue hazard to those persons per § 91.119( a). 

16. The MB-UAS may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet 

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC. 

17. The MB-UAS may not operate within 5 nm of an airport reference point as denoted 

on a current FAA-published aeronautical chart unless a letter of agreement with that 

airport's management is obtained, and the operation is conducted in accordance with 

a NOTAM as required by the FAA. The letter of agreement with the airport 

management will be made available to the Administrator upon request. 

18. Prior to each flight the PIC shall inspect the MB-UAS to confinn that it is in a 

condition safe for flight. The pre-flight inspection will account for all discrepancies, 

e.g. inoperable components, items, or equipment, not already covered in the relevant 

sections of the operating documents as well as equipment updates. The PIC shall not 

operate any MB-UAS if the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe 

operation of the MB-UAS until the necessary maintenance has been performed and 

the MB-UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. The ground control station 

shall be included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and alternations must be 

properly documented in the UAS's records as required by Petitioner's Operations 

Manuals. 

19. Petitioner will timely carry out its maintenance, inspections, and record keeping 

requirements in accordance with the Operations Manuals. Maintenance, inspection, 

and alterations will be fully noted in the MB-UAS records, including total time in 

service, description of work accomplished, date completed and the signature of the 

authorized person returning the MB-UAS to service. 

20. Any MB-UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS 

operation or flight characteristics (e.g., replacement of a flight critical component) 

must timely undergo a functional test flight in accordance with Petitioner's 

Operations Manuals. The PIC who conducts the functional test flight must make an 

entry in the UAS aircraft records of the flight The requirements and procedures for a 

functional test flight and MB-UAS record entry shall be included in the Petitioner's 

Operations Manuals. 
23. Petitioner will obtain an Air Traffic Organization ("ATO") issued Certificate of 

Waiver or Authorization, otherwise known as a COA, prior to conducting any 

operations under this Grant of Exemption. A NOTAM will be issued as required by 

the CO A. All operations will be conducted in accordance with airspace requirements 

in the ATO issued COA including class of airspace, altitude level and potential 

transponder requirements. 

24. All required permissions and permits will be obtained from territorial, state, county or 

city jurisdictions, including local law enforcement, fire or other appropriate 

governmental agencies. 

25. If the MB-UAS loses communication with the PIC, it will have the capability to 

safely return to a pre-determined location within the operational area and land safely. 

26. Contingency plans will be in place to safely terminate flight if there is a loss of 

communication between the PIC and the Observer. 

27. The MB-UAS will have the capability to safely abort flight in the case ofunpredicted 

obstacles or emergencies. 

28. PICs and Observers will have at least a current Class III Medical Certificate or a valid 

and current state driver's license issued within the United States. 

29. Prior to conducting operations for filming, the PIC will have accumulated and logged, 

in a manner consistent with 14 CFR § 61.51(b), a minimum of200 flight cycles and 

25 hours total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot and at least 10 hours logged as a UAS 

pilot with a similar MB-UAS type platfonn. This requirement can be achieved by 

flights conducted and logged as a hobbyist. 

30. Prior to conducting operations for filming, the PIC will have accumulated and logged, 

in a manner consistent with 14 CFR § 61.51 (b), a minimum of hours pursuant to 54 

CFR § 61.51(b) as UAS pilot operating the make and model ofMB-UAS to be 

utilized for operations under the exemption and three take-offs and three landing in 

the preceding 90 days. 

31. Operations shall occur during daytime VFR Meteorological Conditions; flights under 

special visual flight rules ("SVFR") shall not be conducted. 

32. The MB-UAS shall remain clear and yield the right of way to all other manned 

operations and activities at all times (including, but not limited to, ultralight vehicles, 

parachute activities, parasailing activities, hang gliders, etc.). 
any film-flight operations while in motion from atop any elevated platform vehicle or 

device. 

35. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for operation and 

control of the MB-UAS will comply with the Federal Communications Commission 

(FCC) or other appropriate government oversight agency requirements. 

V. REGULATIONS FROM WIDCH EXEMPTION IS REQUESTED 

The Federal Aviation Act expressly grants the FAA the authority to issue exemptions. This 

statutory authority, by its terms, includes exempting civil aircraft, as the term is defined wtder § 

40101 of the Act, including UASs, from its safety regulations and minimum standards when the 

Administrator decides a requested exemption is in the public interest.3 

Petitioner seeks an exemption from several interrelated provisions ofTitle 14 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations ("14 C.F.R") Parts 21, 45,61 and 91 for purposes of conducting the 

requested operations using MB-UAS platforms noted above. Listed below are: (1) the specific 

sections of 14 C.F.R for which exemption is sought, and (2) the operating procedures and 

· safeguards that Petitioner has established which will ensure a level of safety better than or equal 

to the rules from which exemption is sought.4 

UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM 

A. 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H - Airworthiness Certificates and 14 C.F.R. 

§91.203(a)(l) 

The FAA has stated that no exemption is needed from this section if a finding is made under the 

Reform Act that the UAS selected provides an equivalent level of safety when compared to 

aircraft normally used for the same application. These criteria are met and in point of fact 

exceeded, and therefore no exemption is needed. s If, however, the FAA determines that there 

are some characteristics of the chosen UAS that fail to meet the requirements of the Reform Act, 

an exemption is requested. 

3 49 U.S.C. § 4470l(f) (authorizing the grant of exemptions from requirements of regulations prescribed pursuant to 

Sections 4470l(a) and (b) and Sections 44702- 44716). 

4 14 C.F.R § 11 .8l(e), which requires a petition for exemption to include: The reasons why granting the exemption 

would not adversely affect safety, or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that 

provided by the rule from which you seek exemption. 

5 See Grant of Exemption No. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial (FAA-2014-0352 at pgs. 13-14, 22). 
Additionally, the MB-UAS carries neither pilots nor passengers, carries no explosive materials or 

flammable liquid fuels, or other elements identified by Homeland Security as being prohibitive 

and operate exclusively within the parameters stated in Petitioner's Operations Manuals. 

Operations conducted under this exemption will be closely controlled and monitored by the PIC 

operator and will be conducted in compliance with local public safety requirements, to provide 

security for the area of operation. Petitioner will also provide the FAA with advance notice of all 

operations via NOTAMs as required by the applicable COA. In all cases, operation of the MBUAS under the proposed conditions will be at least as safe as, or safer than, conventional 

rotorcraft operating with an airworthiness certificate. Lastly, the MB-UASs do not need a means 

to communicate with other aircraft or ATC, because those capabilities will be solely possessed by 

the PIC and Observer, who are not on board the MB-UAS. 8 In addition, no sense-and-avoid 

technology is necessary for the MB-UASs because they will be operated at all times in VFR 

conditions and within VLOS of the PIC and Operator.9 

6 See e.g., Grant ofExemption No. 11184 to Low Country RC, Corp. (FAA-2014-0803 at pg. 3): "The [DTI SIOOO] 

has the capability to operate safely after experiencing certain in-flight contingencies or failures and uses an autopilot system to maintain UAS stability and control. The UAS is also able to respond to a loss of global positioning 

system (GPS) or a lost-link event with a pre-coordinated, predictable, automated flight maneuver, and manual flight 

control functionality as a backup. These safety features provide an equivalent level of safety compared to a manned 

aircraft performing a similar operation." 

7 See e.g., Grant ofExemption No. 11184 to VOOS Global, LLC. (FAA-2014-0382 at pgs. 4-5): "The MB-UAS can 

be operated entirely by a touch-screen, map-based interface. This means the operator only needs to command the 

system where to go, and the system does all the flying for the operator. The MB-UAS can be operated in both semi 

and fully autonomous flight modes, with the operator simply clicking on a map to create a pre-planned flight path 

for a flight. In addition, the operator can create no fly zones or maximum flight ranges and altitudes so the system 

cannot enter areas deemed unsafe or unnecessary to fly over. The petitioner states further that the UAS has built-in 

intelligent fault handling which allows the MB-UAS to detect a system fault while in the air and automatically fly 

back to its takeoff location and land. Faults that can be detected include: loss of communication; exceeding pre-set 

wind thresholds; and low bauery levels." 

All flight operations are global positioning system (GPS) controlled, making the system easy to navigate. At any 

point if the operator is not explicitly commanding the system to move, the system automatically holds its GPS 

position. The flight control system employs not only GPS positioning but a variety of sensors including sonar, 

barometric pressure, temperature, wind speed and others to ensure stability so long as wind thresholds are not 

exceeded. Also a flight termination link-to prevent a 'fly away' or other potentially dangerous situation- is 

available to the operator." 

1 See Grant ofExemption No. 11062toAstraeusAerial (FAA-2014-0352 at pg. 13). 

9

• Id 
Subpart H, supra. 

C. 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.9(c), 45.23(b) and 45.27(a): Aircraft Marking and Identification 

Requirements 

Petitioner seeks an exemption from the aircraft marking and identification requirements 

contained in 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.9(c), 45.23(b) and 45.27(a). 

• 14 C.F.R. § 91.9(c), Civil Aircraft Flight Manual, Marking and Placard 

requirements, provides that: 

No person may operate a U.S.-registered civil aircraft unless that aircraft 

is identified in accordance with Part 45 of this chapter. 

• 14 C.F.R. § 45.23(b), Markings of the Aircraft, states: 

When marks include only the Roman capital letter "N" and the registration 

number is displayed on limited, restricted or light-sport category aircraft 

or experimental or provisionally certificated aircraft, the operator must 

also display on that aircraft near each entrance to the cabin, cockpit, or 

pilot station, in letters not less than 2 inches nor more than 6 inches high, 

the words "limited," "restricted," "light-sport, "experimental," or 

"provisional," as applicable. 

• 14 C.F.R. § 45.27(a), Rotorcraft, states: 

Each operator of a rotorcraft must display on that rotorcraft horizontally 

on both surfaces of the cabin, fuselage, boom, or tail the marks required by 

§ 45.23. 

In a previous Grant of Exemption, the FAA detennined that exemption from these requirements 

was warranted provided that the aircraft "have identification (N-Number) markings in 

accordance with 14 C.F.R Part 45, Subpart C if the markings are as large as practicable." 10 

Equivalent Level of Safety 

All MB-UAS flown by Petitioner will bear N-number markings that are as large as practicable in 

accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 45, Subpart C.11 

1° FAA Docket No. FAA-2014-0352 

11 See, e.g., FAA Docket No. FAA-2014-0352, at 14. 
91.405(a) (stating that each owner or operator of an aircraft "[s]hall have the aircraft inspected as 

prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections ... have discrepancies 

repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter"). An exemption from these regulations is needed 

because Part 43 and these sections only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, which 

the UAS platforms to be operated under this grant of exemption will not have. (Emphasis added) 

Equivalent Level of Safety 

An equivalent level of safety will be achieved or exceeded because maintenance and inspections 

will be timely performed in accordance with the Manufacturer's Manual and any required 

manufacturer Safety or Service Bulletins. Further, as required by Petitioner's Operations 

Manuals, the PIC will conduct a pre-flight inspection of the MB-UAS and all associated 

equipment to account for all discrepancies and/or inoperable components. Maintenance will be 

performed and verified to address any conditions potentially affecting safe operation of the MBUASs and no flights will occur unless, and until, all flight critical components of the MB-UAS 

have been found to be airworthy and in a condition safe for operation. A functional test flight will 

be conducted following the replacement of any flight-critical components. As required by 

Petitioner's Operations Manuals, the PIC who conducts the functional test flight will make an 

entry in the MB-UAS aircraft records of the flight. 

Petitioner's Operations Manual also includes requirements to follow the manufacturer's UAS 

aircraft/component, maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements 

for the following applicable components: powertrain system (powerplant), propellers, avionics 

and control surfaces (including ailerons/elevons), structures & airframe, camera system, 

electrical systems (including batteries), ground control station, hazard accessories, and spare 

parts. Further, Petitioner's Operations Manuals also include procedures to document and 

maintain a record of the MB-UAS's maintenance, preventative maintenance, alterations, status of 

replacement /overhaul component parts, and the total time in service of the MB-UAS used under 

this Grant of Exemption. As a whole, the maintenance and inspection procedures required in 

Petitioner's Operations Manuals ensure that an equivalent or higher level of safety will be 

achieved. 

PILOT-IN-COMMAND OF THE UAS 

E. 14 C.F.R. § 61.113: Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations 

Petitioner seeks exemption from 14 CFR § 61.113, which restricts private pilot certificate holders 

from flying aircraft for compensation or hire, and would also require a second class medical 

certificate. The purpose of Part 61 is to ensure that the skill and competency of any PIC matches 

the airspace in which the PIC will be operating, as well as requiring certifications if the private 

pilot is carrying passengers or cargo for hire. In this case, while the MB-UAS will be operated as 

part of a commercial operation, they carry neither passengers nor cargo. In the Grant of 
Equivalent Level of Safety 

The restrictions Petitioner has placed on its MB-UAS operations meet or exceed the restrictions 

similarly imposed on Astraeus Aerial. Petitioner will operate on private property away from 

persons and property not involved in the operation. Petitioner will also obtain an ATO issued 

COA prior to conducting any operations under this Grant of Exemption. All operations will be 

conducted in accordance with airspace requirements in the ATO issued COA including class of 

airspace, altitude level and potential transponder requirements. A NOT AM will also be issued as 

required by the applicable COA. 

In addition to these flight restrictions, Petitioner will further ensure safe operation by requiring 

that any PIC be thoroughly versed not only in airspace and communication issues pertaining to 

all aircraft operators but also in the unique aspects ofMB-UAS flight. As set forth in the 

Operations Manuals, pilots will have experience not only in MB-UAS operations generally but 

have logged flight time in the specific make and model used for the operations before they are 

pennitted to participate in commercial flights on behalf of Petitioner. The pilot qualification, 

training, and currency requirements in the Operations Manuals ensure that Petitioner pilots are 

competent and proficient in the MB-UAS they are operating. Petitioner's training and 

qualification requirements are consistent with those contained in prior FAA Section 333 Grants 

of Exemption, and will provide a higher level of competency and proficiency for its pilots and 

will ensure at least an equivalent level of safety to the public. 

OPERATING PARAMETERS OF THE UAS 

F. 14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a): Civil Aircraft Airworthiness 

Inasmuch as there will be no airworthiness certificate issued for the UASs, Petitioner seeks an 

exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91. 7(a), which requires that a civil aircraft be in airworthy condition 

to be operated. The FAA has stated that no exemption is required for 14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a) to the 

extent that the requirements of Part 21 are waived or found inapplicable. 13 Accordingly, 

Petitioner requests that the requirements for§ 91 . 7(a) be treated in accordance with 

Section V(A), supra. 

G. 14 C.F.R. § 91.9(b)(2): Civil Aircraft Flight Manual in the Aircraft and 14 C.F.R. 

§ 91.203(a) and (b): Carrying Civil Aircraft Certification and Registration 

12 Exemption No. 11062 (FAA Docket No. FAA-2014-0352}. 

13 See Id. at 13-14, 22. 
chapter, unless there is available in the aircraft a current approved Airplane or Rotorcraft 

Flight Manual, approved manual material, markings, and placards, or any combination 

thereof. 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 91 .203(a) and (b): 

(a) Except as provided in § 91.715, no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it has 

within it the following: 

( 1) An appropriate and current airworthiness certificate ... 

(b) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless the airworthiness certificate required by 

paragraph (a) of this section or a special flight authorization issued under§ 91.715 is 

displayed at the cabin or cockpit entrance so that it is legible to passengers or crew. 

Given the small size and configuration of the MB-UAS, it would be impossible to keep 

airworthiness documents and other aircraft manuals on board the MB-UAS because there is 

simply no room and the MB-UAS has no cabin or cockpit As a way to comply with the code 

Petitioner will maintain the documents with the PIC and make them available for inspection. 

Equivalent Level of Safety 

In an FAA Office of Chief Counsel's Opinion dated August 8, 2014, and prepared by Dean E. 

Griffith, Attorney, AGC-220, it was acknowledged that the intent of 14 C.F.R. 91.9(b) and 

91.203(a) and (b) is met if the pilot of the unmanned aircraft has access to the UAS flight 

manual, registration certificate, and other required documents from the ground control station 

from which he or she is operating the aircraft. 14 As this FAA Office of Chief Counsel Opinion 

clarifies, the intent of the rule is to ensure the pilot has access to these key documents during 

flight. Therefore, an equivalent level of safety will be achieved by ensuring that the pilot has 

access to the documents at the ground control station from which he or she is piloting the UAS. 

H. 14 C.F.R. § 91.103: Preflight Action 

Petitioner seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.103, which requires a PIC to become familiar 

with specific information before each flight, including information contained in the FAAapproved Flight Manual on board the aircraft. While the PIC will be familiar with all information 

necessary to safely conduct the flight, an exemption is requested to the extent that an FAAapproved Flight Manual is required. 

14 Memorandum from Mark Bury, FAA Assistant Chief Counsel for International Law, Legislation and Regulation, 

to John Duncan, FAA Flight Standards Service (Aug. 8, 2014}; see also Docket No. FAA-2014-0352 at 16-18. 

.. 
will also be required to review weather, flight requirements, battery charge, landing and takeoff 

distance, UA perfonnance data, and contingency landing areas-before initiation of flight. 

Petitioner's Operations Manuals and the Manufacturer's Manual will be kept at the ground 

control station and will be accessible to the PIC at all times while operating the UAS. 

I. 14 C.F.R. § 91.109(a): Flight Instruction 

Petitioner seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.109(a}, which provides in pertinent part that 

"[n]o person may operate a civil aircraft (except a manned free balloon) that is being used for 

flight instruction unless that aircraft has fully functioning dual controls." UASs and remotely 

piloted aircraft, by their design, do not have functional dual controls. Instead, flight control is 

accomplished through the use of a device that communicates with the aircraft via radio 

communications. Accordingly, an exemption will be required for the flight instruction 

requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 91.109(a). 

Equivalent Level of Safety 

Given the size and speed of the UASs that Petitioner intends to use, an equivalent level of safe 

training can still be perfonned without dual controls because no pilot or passengers are aboard 

the UAS, and as required by the Petitioner's Operations Manuals, all persons will be a safe 

distance away in the event that the UAS experiences any difficulties during flight instruction. 

Moreover, as required by the Petitioner's Operations Manuals, all flight training will be 

conducted in controlled and sterile environment. As a whole, the safety procedures provided for 

in Petitioner's Operations Manuals ensure that the proposed UAS operations provide an 

equivalent or higher level of safety than that provided by the flight instruction regulations. 

J. 14 C.F.R. § 91.119(c): Minimum Safe Altitudes 

Petitioner requests an exemption from the minimum safe altitude requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 

91.119( c). 15 Section 91.119 prescribes the minimum safe altitudes under which aircraft may not 

operate, including 500 feet above the surface and away from any person, vessel, vehicle, or 

structme in non-congested areas. See 14 C.F.R. § 91.119(c). Section 91.119(d) allows for a 

helicopter to operate at less than those minimum altitudes when it can be operated "without 

hazard to persons or property on the surface," provided that "each person operating the helicopter 

complies with any routes or altitudes specifically prescribed for helicopters by the FAA." 

15 Relief from§ 91.119(a) will not be necessary because Petitioner will be able to perfonn an emergency landing 

without undue hazard to persons or property on the ground in the event of a failure. Petitioner's proposed UAS 

operations will not occur over congested areas, and therefore an exemption from § 91.119(b) will not be necessary. 

See e.g., Grant of Exemption No. 11157 to Slugwear, Inc., dba Like on a tree Aerial (FAA-2014-0534 at 15). 
Equivalent Level of Safety 

Compared to flight operations with rotorcraft weighing far more than the maximum weights 

proposed herein, and given the lack of flammable fuel with the above noted UASs, any risk 

associated with these operations is far less than those which presently exist with conventional 

aircraft. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight, and speed of the 

MB-UASs, as well as the controlled location where the operations will occur. In order to avoid 

any risk to manned aircraft, flight operations will be restricted to 400 feet AGL or below, or 

when inspecting a U.S. structure whose height exceeds 400 feet AGL, within 100 feet above the 

highest point on that structure and 50 feet horizontally of the structure. 

As set forth in the Operations Manuals, the MB-UAS will be operated in a restricted area, and all 

flights will be operated at a lateral distance of at least 500 feet from any nonparticipating 

persons, unless that person is in a position where he or she is shielded from the MB-UAS and 

any possible debris resulting from its failure. As required by the Operations Manuals, flights will 

be terminated if a nonparticipating person within 500 feet ofthe MB-UAS leaves a shielded 

position. Further, its operations will occur at least 500 feet away from vehicles or structures 

unless the property owner/controller timely has granted permission and the PIC has made a 

safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and, operations near the PIC or 

Observer will not present an undue hazard per § 91.119( a). Adherence to these restrictions in 

Petitioner's Operations Manuals will ensure operations can be conducted without compromising 

public safety. 16 

K. 14 C.F.R. § 91.121: Altimeter Settings 

Petitioner seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.121, which requires a person operating an 

aircraft to maintain cruising altitude or flight level by reference to an altimeter that is set to the 

elevation of the departure airport or barometric pressure. An exemption is required to the extent 

that the UASs do not have a barometric altimeter, but rather a GPS altitude read out. 

16 See e.g., Grant of Exemption No. 11138 to Douglas Trudeau {FAA-2014-0481 at 19): "If barriers or structures are 

present that can sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons from the UA or debris in the event of an accident, then 

the UA may operate closer than 500 feet to persons afforded such protection. The operator must also ensure that 

nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave 

such protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately. When considering how 

to immediately cease opemtions, the primary concern is the safety of those nonparticipating persons. In addition, the 

FAA finds that opemtions may be conducted closer than 500 feet to vessels, vehicles and structures when the 

owner/controller of any such vessels, vehicles or structures gmnts permission for the opemtion and the PIC makes a 

safety assessment of the risk of opemting closer to those objects and determines that it does not present an undue 

hazard." 
initiation point is established for the PIC to confirm accuracy of the onboard GPS!8 

The MB-UAS that Petitioner intends to use for the proposed operations will meet all these 

operational characteristics. Moreover, as required by Petitioner's Operations Manuals, the PIC 

will be required to calibrate the aircraft's GPS compass prior to each flight operation. Like prior 

FAA Section 333 Grants of Exemption, the MB-UAS Petitioner intends to use, and the safety 

mitigation procedures contained in the Operations Manuals, both ensure that an equivalent level 

of safety or greater level will be achieved, and a Grant of Exemption to the requirements of§ 

191.121 is therefore appropriate. 

L. 14 C.F.R. § 91.15l(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions 

Petitioner requests an exemption ftom 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a)'s fuel requirements for flight in 

VFR conditions. Section 91.151 states: 

(a) No person may begin a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless 

(considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the 

first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed -

(1) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or 

{2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45 minutes. 

Here, the technological limitations on UAS battery power means that no meaningful flight 

operations can be conducted while still maintaining a 30-minute battery reserve. An exemption 

ftom the fuel requirements of14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a) is therefore required. Moreover, it is not 

Petitioner's intention to fly the MB-UASs at night. 

Equivalent Level of Safety 

In the Grant of Exemption to VDOS (Exemption No. 11112), the FAA determined that an 

equivalent level of safety to the fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions could be achieved 

by prohibiting the PIC from beginning a MB-UAS flight unless (considering wind and forecast 

weather conditions) there was enough power to fly to the first intended point oflanding and, 

assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 10 minutes. In reaching this 

conclusion, the FAA considered that the UAS batteries for the MB-UAS provide approximately 

50 minutes of powered flight (with payload) and provided battery level and battery time 

17 If the height of the structure being inspected exceeds 400 feet AGL, the UAS will not be operated more than 100 

feet above the highest point on the structure. 

18 See Grant of Exemption No. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial (FAA-2014-0352 at21). 
Similarly, in the Grant of Exemption to Alan Purwin (Exemption No. 11161), the FAA 

determined that an equivalent level of safety to the fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions 

could be achieved by prohibiting the PIC from beginning a flight with the UA unless 

(considering wind and forecast weather conditions), there was enough power to safely fly at 

normal cruising speed to the intended landing point and land the UA with 25% battery power 

remaining. Petitioner will adhere to this limitation for its MB-UAS flights. 

The MB-UAS includes a low battery warning system and the amount of battery reserve power 

remaining is continuously transmitted to the PIC via telemetric data feed, which downlinks from 

the MB-UAS to a ground-based-on-screen display.20 As required by Petitioner's Operations 

Manuals, the PIC will promptly fly the MB-UAS back to the home launch location or predetermined abort location where it may safely land, while still maintaining a minimum of25% 

reserve battery power. Petitioner submits that the procedures requiring flights to be safely 

terminated once the batteries fall below 25% capacity, combined with the requirement that flights 

only be conducted within a secure, isolated area, using a UAS weighing less than 55 pounds, and 

within VLOS of the PIC and Observer(s), ensure that the proposed operation will provide an 

equivalent or higher level of safety to the public to that provided by the regulations from which 

exemption is sought. 

VI. DRUG AND ALCOHOL PROGRAM 

Petitioner will have policies in place to ensure that no person may participate in MB-UASs flight 

operations if they are under the influence of alcohol or any drug. 

VII. PUBLIC INTEREST 

The public interest will be served by granting Petitioner's Petition for Exemption. Congress has 

established a national policy that favors early integration ofUAS into the NAS in controlled, safe 

working environments such as those proposed in this Petition. Granting this Petition for 

Exemption helps fulfill Congress' goal in passing Section 333(a) through (c) of the Reform 

Act-the FAA Administrator's assessment of whether certain UAS may operate safely in the 

NAS before completion of the statutorily required rulemaking. 

19

• Grant of Exemption No. 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC (FAA-2014-0382 at 10). 

20

• The MB-UAS ground control station displays, the UASs position, navigation route, tail number, altitude, 

beading, north seeking SJTOW, range to targets, calculated target position, date/time, and sensor heading and 

orientation relative to the UAS. 
climb towers, trees, venture onto precarious roofs and other dangerous scenarios, perfonn 

elevated work for which the individual is neither trained nor equipped to perfonn, which 

exposes them to unnecessary risk of serious physical injury from dangerous falls or other 

physical mishaps. Moreover, inspectors/surveyors are often unnecessarily exposed to hazardous 

conditions, unsafe environments, culturally tense situations and other hazards associated with 

identifying specific locations for potential recording sites to be used in the end product. The use of small UASs can eliminate these hazards and ultimately create a much safer method of 

performing these types of inspections creating a safer environment for the public as well as 

Petitioner employees. 

The use of small UAS also enhances safety and reduces risk to the surrounding public because, 

unlike manned aircraft weighing thousands of pounds, carrying crew in addition to flammable 

fuel, the UAS carry no passengers, crew or explosive fuel. Furthennore, in the unlikely event of 

an accident, Petitioner,s small battery powered MB-UAS presents significantly less danger to 

persons on the ground when compared to operations by conventional manned aircraft. 21 As 

Petitioner's MB-UAS are battery powered, the public will also benefit from a reduction in 

harmful petroleum based emissions associated with conventional aircraft perfonning in the same 

functions proposed herein. Air quality will naturally be improved with the reduction of fuel 

powered vehicles. 

Lastly, as recognized by the FAA in prior Section 333 Grants of Exemption to filmmakers, UASs 

provide an additional economic tool for the aerial filming notwithstanding the industry, adding a 

greater degree of flexibility, which supplements the current capabilities offered by manned aircraft.22 The quality of the finished product is enhanced and provides a greater finished product 

demand which will aid the current UAS industry and provide additional jobs as the cost of 

providing the needed product is greatly reduced while reducing the difficulty with which the 

finished product is created. The demand for the current industrial product is increasing and will continue to increase given the enhanced flexibility of production; therefore, given the lower cost, 

owner/operators and others in the relevant industry will be more inclined to utilize the services of 

commercial UAS along with an appropriate licensed PIC's. 

21 See Grant ofExemption No. 11158 to Team 5, LLC (FAA-2014-0783 at 12): "Manned helicopters conducting 

aerial filming can weigh 6,000 pounds or more and are operated by an onboard pilot, in addition to other onboard 

crewmembers, as necessary. The petitioner's UAS will weigh less than 55 pounds with no onboard pilot or crew. 

The pilot and crew will be remotely located from the aircraft. The limited weight significantly reduces the potential 

for harm to participating and nonparticipating individuals or property in the event of an incident or accident. Risk to 

an ooboard pilot and crew during an incident or accident is eliminated with the use of a UA for the aerial filming 

operation." 

22 See e.g., Grant ofExemption No. 11178 to Picture Factory, Inc. (FAA-2014-0794 at 18). 
conducted. 

IX. FEDERAL REGISTER SUMMARY 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11, the following summary is provided for publication in the 

FEDERAL REGISTER, should it be determined that publication is needed: Petitioner seeks an 

exemption from the following rules in Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations: 

Part 21, Subpart H; Part 27; 45.23(b); 45.27(a); 61.113; 91.7(a); 91.9(b)(2); 91.9(c); 

91.103; 91.109(a); 91.119(c); 91.121; 91.151{a); 91.203 (a) & (b); 91.405(a); 91.407(a)(l); 

91.409(a)(l) & (2); 91.417 (a) & (b). 

The exemption will enhance safety by reducing risk to the aircraft crew, production crew, general public, property owners and city structures from the substantial hazards associated with 

performing equivalent film work and aerial video production with conventional fixed· wing 

aircraft, rotorcraft, or other methods. 

X. CONCLUSION 

Petitioner's Petition for Exemption satisfies the criteria articulated in Section 333 of the Reform 

Act of2012 which includes weight; speed; operating capabilities; proximity to airports and populated areas; operation within VLOS and nationaJ security. The proposed MB·UAS 

operations will benefit the public as a whole by improving safety and reducing risk by alleviating human exposure to danger while lowering the attendant related costs thereby increasing the demand for the finished product. In consideration of the foregoing, this Petition for Exemption 

provides the FAA with more than adequate justification for granting the requested exemptions aJlowing Petitioner to use small MB·UAS s in the recorded production of its product. 

We thank you for your prompt consideration of our requested exemptions. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

~Z.

~-~~ 

MBVideoDrone 

39734 174th Street E. 

Palmdale, CA 93591 

Phone: 818.836.4828: Email: ca164kid@gmail.com 
2. PIC Operating Manual 

3. Company Protocols 

4. Location Protocols 

5. Flight Communications Protocols 

6. Departing Location Protocols 

7. Transmitter Protocols 

8. Preflight Checklist 

9. Post Flight Checklist 

10. Equipment Checklist 

11. UAS Manufacturer's Manuals 

a. User Manuals 

b. UAS Maintenance Manuals 

PETITIONER REQUESTS THAT GOOD CAUSE EXISTS TO EXEMPT ANY PART OF 

TIDS PETITION FROM BEING PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER PUBLIC 

FORUM BECAUSE THE REQUESTED EXEMPTION WOULD NOT SET A 

PRECEDENT, AND ANY DELAY IN ACTING ON TIDS PETITION WOULD BE 

DETRIMENTAL TO THE PETITIONER.