# + 2

(,1 1/,1(

Citation: 45 Fed. Reg. 7544 1980

Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Tue Nov 12 18:43:16 2013

-- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License

-- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text.7544 Federal Register / Vol. 45, No. 24 / Monday, February 4, 1980 / Rules and Regulations

II

'Dated: January 22, 1980. C. R. Thompson, Captain,US. CoastGuard, Captain of

the Port, HamptonRoads.
(FR'Doc. 80-3M3 Filed 2-1-0; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-14-M

33 CFR Part 183
[CGD 76-082]
Ventilation Safety Standards for Recreational Boats

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT. ACTION: Correction offinal rule.

SUMMARY: In FR Doc. 79-38640 appearing at page 73025 in the FederalRegister ofDecember 17,-1979, paragraph 183.630(a) is corrected by deleting "a" after the word "having", and paragraph 183.630(a)(1) is corrected by adding "A" to precede the word "supply".

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:. Mr. Lars E. Granholm, Office ofBoating Safety (G-BBT), U.S. Coast Guard, Department ofTransportation, Washin, ton,D.C. 20593 (202/426-4027).

Dated: January 30, 1980. B. E. Thompson, RearAdmiral, U.S. CoastGuard,Chief,Office of

BoatingSafety.

[FR Doec. 80-3641 Filed 2-1-80;. 45 am] BILWNG Code 4910-14-M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[FRL 1384-3]
Nevada Plan Revision: Air Quality Control Region Redesignation
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rulemaking.

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency takes final action to approve the redesignation ofthe Nevada portion (Clark County) ofthe Clark-Mohave Interstate Air Quality Control Region (AQCR) as an intrastate AQCR. On March 23, 1979, under section 107(e) of the Clean Air Act, as amended, the redesignation was submitted forEPA approval by the Governor ofNevada. The intended effect ofthis redesignation is toimprove management ofthe air

resources in southern Nevada and to be consistent with and in support ofa redesignation action by the Governor of Arizona. EFFECTIVE DATE: February 4, 1980. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Louise P. Giersch, Director, Air and Hazardous Materials*Division, Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 215 Fremont Street, San Francisco, Calif.94105, Attn: Douglas Grano; (415) 556-2938.

bUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background

Under section 107 ofthe Clean Air Act, as amended, the Clark-Mohave Interstate AQCR was designated by the Administrator. ThisAQCR is described in 40 CFR 81.80 as including all ofClark County, Nevada, and Mohave and Yuma Counties, Arizona.

The Governor ofArizona, in a letter dated January 26, 1979, requested that the AQCR's inArizona be redesignated to conform to the boundaries of the Arizona Planning Districts. This request included the redesignation ofthe ClarkMohave Interstate AQCR to an intrastate AQCR consisting ofMohave and Yuma Counties. With the exception ofthe Clark-Mohave Interstate AQCR, the EPA will address the Arizona redesignations in a separate Federal Register notice.

Clark County Redesignation

In a letter dated March 23, 1979, the Governor ofNevada requested the EPA's approval ofhisredesignation of 'the Nevada portion (Clark County) of the Clark-Mohave Interstate AQCR as an intrastate AQCR.

.Asstated by GovernorList, the redesignation will furtherimprove management ofthe air resources in southern Nevada. The Governor also states that the provisions ofsection 126 of the Clean Air Act are adequate to protect the citizens ofeach state from air pollution from new sources located in the other state. Thus the redesignation ofClark County as an intrastate AQCR is expected to have no adverse ffect upon interstate air pollution within the present ClarkMohave Interstate AQCR. Effects ofRedesignation As a result ofthis redesignaton, minor revisions are being made to the Codeof Federal Regulations(CFR), In 40 CFR part 81, the name and description ofthe AQCR in § 81.80 are being revised, and a new AQCR is being added. In 40 CFR §52.121 and §52.1471 (Classification ofregions), and in40 CFR § 52.130 (Source surveillance) the name ofthe AQCR is being changed.

The EPA is approving this redesignation because it meets the requirements of section 107(e) of the Clean Air Act, as amended, which requires, in effect, that the redesignation be forpurposes ofimproved air quality management. In addition, the Governor ofArizona has consented to the proposed redesignation, as required by section 107(e).

On June 22,1979 (44 FR 30434) the EPA published a Notice ofProposed Rulemaking, proposing to redesignate Clark County as an intrastate AQCR and inviting public comments on that proposal. No comments were received.

TheEPA has determined that this document is not a significant regulation and does not require preparation of a regulatory analysis under Executive. Order 12044. (Sections 107,110 and 301(a) ofthe Clat Air Act, as amended (42U.S.C. 7407, 7410, and 7601(a)))

Dated: January 29, 1980. Douglas M.Costle, Administrator. Chapter 1,Title 40 ofthe Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52-APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Subpart D-Arizona

1. Section 52.121 is revised to read as follows: §52.121 Classification ofregions.

The Arizona plan is evaluated on the basis ofthe following classifications:

Pollutant

Air qualiy control region Particulate Sulfur Nitrogen Carbon Ozone

matter oxides dioxide monoxide

Arizona-New Mexico Southern Border Interstate. IA IA Itl III III Mohave-Yuma Intrastate

. I IA III I I Four Comers Interstate

.... ... IA IA Ill III III Phoenix-Tucson Intrastate

.. ... I I III I IFederal Register / Vol. 45, No. 24 

### / Monday, February 4, 1980 / Rules and Regulations

"2. Paragraphs (a) and (c)(1) of § 52.130
are revised to read as follows: § 52.130 Source VurveiIlance.

(a)The requirements of §51.19(a) of this chapter are not met since the plan does not contain legally enforceable procedures forrequiring sources in Gila, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties in the Phoenix-Tucson Intrastate Region, in the Mohave-Yuma Intrastate Region, and in the Arizona portions ofthe ArizonaNew Mexico SouthernBorder and Four Comers Interstate Regions to maintain records ofand periodically report on the nature and amounts ofemissions.
c) Regulation forsource recordkeeping andreporting. (1) The

owner or operator ofany stationary

source in the counties ofGila, Pinal, or Santa Cruz in the Phoenix-Tucson Intrastate Region [§ 81.36 ofthis chapter); the Mohave-Yuma Intrastate Region [§ 81.268 ofthis chapter); or-the Arizona portions ofthe FourComers or Arizona-New Mexico Southern Border Interstate Regions [§ §81.121 and 81.99 ofthis chapter) shall, upon notification from the Administrator, maintain records ofthe nature and amounts of emissions from such source or any other information asmay be deemed necessary by the Administrator to determine whether such source is in compliance with applicable emission limitations or other control measures.

Subpart OD-Nevada

3. Section 52.1470, paragraph (c)(15) is added as follows: §52.1470 Identification ofplan.

(c)~ (15) Redesignation of the ClarkMohave Interstate AQCR submitted on March 23,1979, by the Governor.

4. Section 52.1471 is revised to read as follows:
§ 52.1471 Classification ofregions.

The Nevada plan is evaluated on the basis ofthe following classifications: PART 81-DESIGNATION OF AREAS FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING PURPOSES Subpart B-Designaton of Air Quality Control Regions

5. Section 81.80 is revised toread as follows: §81.80 Las Vegas Intrastate Air Quality Control Region.

TheLas Vegas Intrastate Air Quality ControlRegion (Nevada)has been revised to consist of the territorial area encompassed by the boundaries ofthe followingjurisdiction or described area (including the territorial area ofall municipalities (as defined in section 302(f) ofthe Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7602(f)) geographically located within the outermost boundaries ofthe area so delimited):

In the State ofNevada: Clark County. *6. Section 81.268 is added as follows: §81.268 Mohave-Yuma Intrastate Air Quality Control Region.

The Mohave-Yuma Intrastate Air Quality Control Region (Arizona)has been revised to consist ofthe territorial
area encompassed by the boundaries of the following jurisdictions ordescribed
area (including the territorial area ofall municipalities (as defined in section 302(f) ofthe Clean Air Act 42 U.S.C. 7602 (f) geographically located within the outermost boundaries ofthe area so delimited):

Inthe State ofArizona: Mohave County and Yuma County. IFRDoc. W-0619 Filed Z-1-ft 1iS am] BILLING COOE 656"1-M

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE
Office of the Secretary 41 CFR Part 3-3 Noncompetitive Procurement AGENCY- Department ofHealth, Education. and Welfare. ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The Office ofthe Secretary, Department ofHealth, Education, and

Ai quady co:trol region Partijate Su!fu t-rogen CArbon Ozone matter oxides doale monoxide
LasVegas tntstat I IA I1 I I Norditiest Nevada IntrastateI M III ll Nevada Intrastate IA IA IN 13 W Welfare is amending the departmental procurement regulations. 41 CFR Chapter3, to add a new subpart concerning noncompetitive procurement. Coverage ofnoncompetitive procurement ispresently located at § 3- 3.802-50. and this section is being cancelled as a result ofthe establishment ofthe new Subpart 3-3.53, Noncompetitive Procurement. The regulation isbeing established as a subpart to emphasize the importance of the subject matter and tofacilitate reference.

. Changes to the existing regulation are being made in three areas. Thefirst change concerns criteria, §3-3.5303, where revisions have been made to clarify the term "sources sought synopsis" and to explain itsuse.The second change concerns review and approval. J 3-3.5306, where revisions have been made to accommodate a recent Federal Procurement Regulations amendment to 

### §1-3.101(d) which requires that noncompetitive procurements over$10,000 be reviewed and approved by an official above the contracting officer level prior to negotiations. The third change concerns whole project buys, §3-3.5308, where a definition and explanation ofitsuse have been added to clarify the concept. EFFECTIVE DATE:February 4,1980.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:. I. S. Lanham, Office ofProcurement Policy, Office ofGrants and Procurement OASMB-OS, Department ofHealth. Education, and Welfare, Washington. D.C. 20201,202-24504,1.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Since the noncompetitive Procurement regulation

was being restructured into the subpart format, some portions have been edited andrewritten for clarity and simplicity. However, the meaning and intenthave not been altered fromwhat is presently stated in §3-3.802-50, except as indicated in the Summary.

Itis the general policy of the Department to allow time forinterested parties toparticipate inthe rule making process. However, since the amendments are administrative in nature, the public rule making process is deemed unnecessary in this instance. The provisions of this amendment are issued under 5U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).

Therefore. 41 CFR Chapter3 is amended as set forth below. iN 7545