alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Mary Jane Robertson, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date:  August 2, 2007 By:  /s/ *Mary Jane Robertson*   Mary Jane Robertson   Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5298 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5298

To amend the Adams National Historical Park Act of 1998 to include the 
 Quincy Homestead within the boundary of the Adams National Historical 
                     Park, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 2006

 Mr. Delahunt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Adams National Historical Park Act of 1998 to include the 
 Quincy Homestead within the boundary of the Adams National Historical 
                     Park, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; FINDINGS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Adams National 
Historical Park Boundary Addition Act of 2006''.
    (b) Finding.--The Quincy Homestead has been designated a National 
Historic Landmark.

SEC. 2. ADDITION TO ADAMS NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK.

    Section 4(b) of the Adams National Historical Park Act of 1998 (16 
U.S.C. 410eee-2(b)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and
            (2) by adding after paragraph (1) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(2) The property at 34 Butler Road in Quincy, 
        Massachusetts, known as the Quincy Homestead and carriage shed, 
        consisting of approximately 1.8 acres, as generally depicted on 
        the map entitled `Boundary Addition Adams National Historical 
        Park', numbered N.E.R.R.D. 386/80,001, and dated August, 
        2003.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 09A839.

#### New York, Applicant v. Darrell Williams, et al.

559 U.S. 1065, 130 S. Ct. 2138,

176 L. Ed. 2d 719,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3452.

April 19, 2010.

Application for stay, addressed to Justice Alito and referred to the Court, denied.
In the MATTER OF: The Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust Executed by Jamie K. DAVIS and Rhea Davis and John W. Davis (Present Record Owner(s): in John W. Davis and Jamie K. Davis in the Original Amount of $271,258.00, Dated September 29, 2008, Recorded in Book 1888, Page 633 Davidson County Registry.

Substitute Trustee Services, Inc., Substitute Trustee.

No. COA 18-882

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 2, 2019

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION

Under 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Mamma.com Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, to such officers
knowledge, that:

(1) Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 of the Company (Form
20-F) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 14, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    Martin Bouchard               
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Martin Bouchard                      
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                             
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 14, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    Daniel Bertrand      
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Daniel Bertrand             
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-41535 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KELA BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CR-25-2

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender (FPD), appointed to represent appellant Kela Brown, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brown has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, the FPD is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D June 23, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, John W. Jardine, certify that;

(1)          I have reviewed this report on Form10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 of Nordic Nickel Ltd.;

(2)          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)          The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)          designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)          evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)          disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)          The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)          any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  

 

Date:     August 13, 2007

/s/ John W. Jardine

___________________________________ 

By:        John W. Jardine
#### Michael GAVE, Appellant, v. GRACE LINE, INC., Alfred DeSmedt and Roy Thomas Currie.

No. 15218.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued June 17, 1965.

Decided June 25, 1965.

Norman Shigon, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

T. E. Byrne, Jr., Erusen, Evans, & Byrne, Philadelphia, Pa. (Louis J. Gus*568mano, Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York City, on the brief), for appellees.

Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In the instant case it appears that the District Court, 237 F.Supp. 557, granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on December 7, 1964. The defendants had not then filed their Answers to the plaintiff’s interrogatories although they had been directed to do so by the District Court’s Order dated May 25, 1964.

Counsel for the defendants has now advised this Court that it is prepared to file Answers to the plaintiff’s interrogatories. Inasmuch as such Answers may develop the existence of a genuine issue as to a material fact, the District Court’s Judgment of December 7, 1964 will be vacated and the cause remanded so that the defendants’ Answers to the plaintiff’s interrogatories may be filed, with directions to the District Court to make such disposition as it may deem requisite upon consideration of such Answers.
EXHIBIT 31.1



I, Richard Kehmeier, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Goldfields International Inc.;
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: June 18, 2012



|/s/ Richard Kehmeier                  | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|Richard Kehmeier                      | 
|Chief Executive Officer and President |
#### John Ringling Estates, a Corporation, *Appellant,*v. *Z.*G. Dunn, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed April 4, 1928.

*Bmket <& Fish, Harold H. Flower, Francis C. Dart*and *F. W. Dart,*for Appellant;

*John J. Strickland,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from an order overruling a general demurrer to a bill of complaint praying for the specific enforcement of a contract to convey real estate. The bill of complaint does not wholly fail to state an equity for appropriate relief and the general demurrer was properly overruled.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
MEMORANDUM

DATE: June 11, 2012 SUBJECT: Note to file re elements of SJV equivalent alternative program FROM: Kara Christenson TO: Andy Steckel

Lily Wong
The “program” includes, but is not limited to, the following:
Rule 3170 as adopted on May 19, 2011. Vehicle Code 9250.17, which says that the DMV shall, if requested by an air district, collect fees established pursuant to Health & Safety Code 44223 and 44225 upon registration of any motor vehicle and distribute the revenues to the District. AB 2522, including:

o Health & Safety Code section 40612(a)(1) , which authorizes SJVUAPCD to increase motor vehicle fees by up to $30 per motor vehicle per year to establish and maintain
incentive

- based programs that are intended to address air pollution caused by motor vehicles and achieve and maintain state and federal ai r quality standards.

o Health & Safety Code section 40612(b) , which specifies that at least ten million dollars of motor vehicle registration fees be used to mitigate air pollution impacts on disadvantaged communities.

o Health & Safety Code s ection 40612(c) , which requires the District and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to take certain steps to effectuate the supplementalmotor vehicle fee: (1) the District must notify CARB that it has adopted the fee and provide an estimate of the amount of reve nue that will be generated; (2) CARB must file with the California Secretary of State written findings that the District has performed the above requirements and that the District has undertaken all feasible measure to reduce nonattainment air pollutants f rom sources within the District’s jurisdiction and regulatory control. Governing Board Resolution No. 10

- 10

- 14 dated October 21, 2010 , which documents that the SJV governing board had exercised its authority to increase motor vehicle fees by $12 per
year p er motor vehicle and that it estimated the additional fee would generate approximately $34 million in additional funds.
California Air Resources Board Executive Order G

- 10

- 126, dated December 10, 2010, which documents that CARB had made the findings requ ired by Health & Safety Code 40612; documentation that the findings had been submitted to the California Secretary of State.
Before the

DEPARTM ENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

INTRA ALASKA BUSH MAIL RATES Docket OST-2003-14694

NOTE CONCERNING DOCUMENT FILED BY

CONSOLIDATED CARRIERS

Communications with respect to this

document should be addressed to:

Joseph Anzalone, Esq.

Office of General Counsel

United States Postal Service

475 L’Enfant Plaza SW Washington, DC 20260-1127 joseph.anzalone@usps.gov

Date Filed: March 2, 2011

12 The Postal Service notes that on March 1, 2011, a document from Mr. Hank Myers entitled “Reply of the Consolidated Carriers to the USPS and Peninsula Airways Comments,” dated March 1, 2011, was allegedly added to Docket OST-2003-14694. It offers a “response” to comments earlier filed by othe r parties, including the Postal Service, pursuant to the Department’s February 11, 2011 notice allowing parties to respond to comments filed by the Consolidated Carriers on January 27, 2011, in response to Show Cause Order 2010-12-28.

In the Department’s February 11, 2011 notice, the Department stipulated that because the February 11 notice was the second extension for comments associated with Show Cause Order 2010-12-28, the Department did “not anticipa te granting any further extensions.”

Accordingly, given that Mr. Myer s’ submission is unauthorized, the Postal Service does not seek to respond to it. However, should the Department revise its view and undert ake to consider this filing, the Postal Service respectf ully requests that it and all a ffected carriers have a reasonable opportunity to reply to the submission.
Douglas Martin EPPS, Employee-Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL TIRE THE AMERICAS, Self-Insured, Employer-Defendant-Appellee.

Part of the Continental Tire the Americas Consolidated Asbestos Matters.

No. COA18-768

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 3, 2019

AFFIRMED.
STATE v. Shawn Patrick ELLIS

340A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 29, 2019

Michele A. Goldman, Assistant Appellate Defender, For Ellis, Shawn Patrick

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina

T. Lynn Clodfelter, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of August 2019 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of August 2019."
No. 08-1457.

#### New Process Steel, L.P., Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board.

559 U.S. 1059, 130 S. Ct. 2088,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3141.

176 L. Ed. 2d 580,

April 16, 2010.

The parties are directed to file supplemental briefs addressing the following question: “What should be the effect, if any, of the developments discussed in the letter submitted by the Solicitor General on March 29, 2010, on the proper disposition of this case?” The briefs, in letter format, limited to 8 pages, are to be filed simultaneously with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 2 p.m., Monday, April 26, 2010.
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael R. SOLOMON

No. 47P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Michael R. Solomon, for Solomon, Michael R.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Michael D. Waters, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 31st of January 2019 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Warren County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1265 KA 10-01411 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, GREEN, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
JAMIE L. CRAWFORD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

CARR SAGLIMBEN LLP, OLEAN (JAY D. CARR OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LORI PETTIT RIEMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LITTLE VALLEY (KELLY M. BALCOM OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Cattaraugus County Court (Larry M. Himelein, J.), rendered April 12, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree and assault in the first degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed ( see People v Hidalgo , 91 NY2d 733, 737).

Entered: December 23, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 24(a)

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

        The undersigned, being a director of Lindsay Manufacturing Co. (the
"Company"), hereby appoints Richard W. Parod as his agent and attorney-in-fact
for the purpose of executing and filing all reports on Form 10-K relating to the
year ending August 31, 2002, and any amendments thereto, required to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the Company.


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
as of the date indicated.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         SIGNATURE                                      CAPACITY                       DATE
         ---------                                      --------                       ----
<S>                                         <C>                                   <C>
/s/ HOWARD G. BUFFETT                       Chairman of the Board
------------------------------              of Directors                          November 24, 2002
Howard G. Buffett

/s/ MICHAEL N. CHRISTODOLOU                 Director                              November 1, 2002
------------------------------
Michael N. Christodolou

/s/ LARRY H. CUNNINGHAM                     Director                              November 15, 2002
------------------------------
Larry H. Cunningham

/s/ J. DAVID MCINTOSH                       Director                               November 1, 2002
------------------------------
J. David McIntosh

/s/ WILLIAM F. WELSH II                     Director                               November 1, 2002
------------------------------
William F. Welsh II
</TABLE>



                                       47