alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN HEALTH PRODUCTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             321
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,750
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (73)
<INVENTORY>                                      8,095
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,416
<PP&E>                                          10,319
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (737)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,514
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,122
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,487
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,514
<SALES>                                         47,589
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,712
<CGS>                                           38,359
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,384
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    78
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    77
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (304)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (56)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (248)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (917)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,165)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.32)
        

</TABLE>
Office *of the* Director *of*  National Intelligence
 
 
 HOME GLOBAL TRENDS REPORT FIVE-YEAR REGIONAL OUTLOOKS  | DEEPER LOOKS MEDIA & DOWNLOADS
 Print
			
		
	
	
		
								Menu Show/Hide
INTRODUCTION
Foreword
Key Themes
Executive Summary
The COVID Factor: Expanding Uncertainty
STRUCTURAL FORCES
Structural Forces: Setting the Parameters
Demographics and Human Development
Future Global Health Challenges
Environment
Economics
Technology
EMERGING DYNAMICS
Emerging Dynamics: Societal, State, and International
Societal: Disillusioned, Informed, and Divided
State: Tensions, Turbulence, and Transformation
International: More Contested, Uncertain, and Conflict Prone
The Future of Terrorism: Diverse Actors, Fraying International Efforts
SCENARIOS FOR 2040
Scenarios for 2040: Charting the Future Amid Uncertainty
Renaissance of Democracies
A World Adrift
Competitive Coexistence
Separate Silos
Tragedy and Mobilization
REGIONAL FORECASTS
20-year Projections
Latin America
Europe
Russia and Eurasia
Middle East & North Africa
Sub-Saharan Africa
South Asia
North East Asia
South East Asia
Oceania
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Acknowledgements
**REGIONAL FORECASTS**
MIDDLE EAST & NORTH AFRICA
*(MIDDLE EAST & NORTH AFRICA - Click image to enlarge)*
 Officeof the DirectorofNational Intelligence


Contact ODNI

          ODNI Centers
National Counterterrorism CenterNational Counterintelligence and Security CenterNational Counterproliferation and Biosecurity CenterCyber Threat Intelligence Integration CenterForeign Malign Influence Center

           Oversight
Equal Employment OpportunityIC Inspector GeneralIC Diversity Equity Inclusion and AccessibilityCivil Liberties, Privacy, and TransparencyOffice of General CounselMore Offices

          Information
IC IG HotlineNo FEAR ActPrivacy PolicyCustomer ServiceAccessibilityFOIASystem of Record Notices

          Useful Links
For KidsReady.govOpen.govFlu.govPlain Language ActODNI Operating StatusCoronavirus Disease GuidanceAdobe Acrobat Reader
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5274 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5274

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a deduction for 
               the provision of boating safety equipment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 2, 2006

 Mr. Sweeney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a deduction for 
               the provision of boating safety equipment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Boating Safety Tax Incentive Act.''

SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR BOATING SAFETY EQUIPMENT.

    (a) In General.--Part VI of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended at the end of the following 
new section:

``SEC. 199A. BOATING SAFETY EQUIPMENT.

    ``(a) Allowance of Deduction.--There is allowed a deduction for the 
provision without charge of qualified boating safety equipment by a 
boat manufacturer to purchasers of eligible boats.
    ``(b) Amount of Deduction.--The deduction under subsection (a) 
shall be the lesser of the fair market value of the qualified boating 
safety equipment determined by the retail price of such equipment, or 
twice of the boat manufacturer's basis or cost of such qualified 
boating safety equipment.
    ``(c) Definitions.--For the purposes of this section:
            ``(1) Qualified boating safety equipment.--The term 
        `qualified boat safety equipment' means--
                    ``(A) United States Coast Guard approved personal 
                flotation devices, except for Type IV or throwable 
                personal flotation devices; and
                    ``(B) Category I or Category II 406 MHZ emergency 
                position indicating radio beacons.
            ``(2) Eligible boats.--The term `eligible boats' means--
                    ``(A) any new recreational boats; and
                    ``(B) any `small passenger vessel' as that term is 
                described in 46 U.S.C. 2101 carrying not more than 250 
                passengers; and
                    ``(C) any `uninspected passenger vessel' as that 
                term is described in 46 U.S.C. 2101.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to qualified boat safety equipment provided after January 1, 
2007.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 20

- 00308

- CV

Sruhad Sudhirbhai PATEL

, Appellant

v.

Janvi Atulkumar PATEL

, Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI09524

Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s final decree of divorce

is AFFIRMED. Appellee’s motion for damages is DENIED. We tax cost s of court for this appeal

against Sruhad Sudhirbhai Patel

.

SIGNED May 19, 2021.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
No. 09-700.

#### Homaidan Al-Turki, Petitioner v. Colorado.

559 U.S. 1057, 130 S. Ct. 2342,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2964.

176 L. Ed. 2d 577,

April 5, 2010.

Motion of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.
Office *of the* Director *of*  National Intelligence
 
 
 HOME GLOBAL TRENDS REPORT FIVE-YEAR REGIONAL OUTLOOKS  | DEEPER LOOKS MEDIA & DOWNLOADS
 Print
			
		
	
	
		
								Menu Show/Hide
INTRODUCTION
Foreword
Key Themes
Executive Summary
The COVID Factor: Expanding Uncertainty
STRUCTURAL FORCES
Structural Forces: Setting the Parameters
Demographics and Human Development
Future Global Health Challenges
Environment
Economics
Technology
EMERGING DYNAMICS
Emerging Dynamics: Societal, State, and International
Societal: Disillusioned, Informed, and Divided
State: Tensions, Turbulence, and Transformation
International: More Contested, Uncertain, and Conflict Prone
The Future of Terrorism: Diverse Actors, Fraying International Efforts
SCENARIOS FOR 2040
Scenarios for 2040: Charting the Future Amid Uncertainty
Renaissance of Democracies
A World Adrift
Competitive Coexistence
Separate Silos
Tragedy and Mobilization
REGIONAL FORECASTS
20-year Projections
Latin America
Europe
Russia and Eurasia
Middle East & North Africa
Sub-Saharan Africa
South Asia
North East Asia
South East Asia
Oceania
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Acknowledgements
**REGIONAL FORECASTS**
SOUTH EAST ASIA
*(SOUTH EAST ASIA - Click image to enlarge)*
 Officeof the DirectorofNational Intelligence


Contact ODNI

          ODNI Centers
National Counterterrorism CenterNational Counterintelligence and Security CenterNational Counterproliferation and Biosecurity CenterCyber Threat Intelligence Integration CenterForeign Malign Influence Center

           Oversight
Equal Employment OpportunityIC Inspector GeneralIC Diversity Equity Inclusion and AccessibilityCivil Liberties, Privacy, and TransparencyOffice of General CounselMore Offices

          Information
IC IG HotlineNo FEAR ActPrivacy PolicyCustomer ServiceAccessibilityFOIASystem of Record Notices

          Useful Links
For KidsReady.govOpen.govFlu.govPlain Language ActODNI Operating StatusCoronavirus Disease GuidanceAdobe Acrobat Reader
STATE of North Carolina v. Patrick Lynn GRIGGS

No. COA18-1000

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 6, 2019

NO ERROR IN PART. REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.
#### E. Lee Stapp, Walter Ray and D. E. McIver, *Plaintiffs in Error,*v. B. P. Connolly and H. C. Wallace, *Defendants in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed March 26, 1926.

Petition for Rehearing Denied June 23, 1926.

JET. *M. Hampton*and *L. W. Duval,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Kay, Adams & Ragland*and *R. A. Burford,*for Defendants in Error.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J,, Concur.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                EXHIBIT 23-7



February 25, 1997



MCN Corporation
500 Griswold
Detroit, Michigan  48226


RE:     MCN Corporation
        1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K



Ladies and Gentlemen:


The firm of Advanced Resources International, Inc. consents to the use of its
name and the information contained in its report dated January 21, 1997, 
regarding MCN Corporation oil and gas reserve information as of December 31,
1996, in its 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In addition Advanced Resources International, Inc. consents to the
incorporation by reference of said material in Registration Statement Nos.
333-02105 and 333-02107 on Form S-8, 333-01521, 333-01523 and 33-57115 on Form
S-3 and Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No.
33-21930-99 on Form S-8 of MCN Corporation.

Advanced Resources International, Inc. has no interest in MCN Corporation or in
any affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive such interest as
payment for such reports and has no director, officer, or employee otherwise
connected with MCN Corporation.  We are not employed by MCN Corporation on a
contingent basis.


Very truly yours,



Vello A. Kuusakraa
President
**EXHIBIT 31.2****RULE 13A-14(a) [SECTION 302] CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Douglas N. Biddle, Chief Executive Officer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarter report on Form 10-Q of Plumas Bancorp (the Registrant);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: November 9, 2005    /s/ D. N. Biddle   Douglas N. Biddle, Chief Executive Officer
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4831 

To confirm as authorized, valid, and enforceable certain contractual rights 

of water users and water users organizations under the Strawberry 

Valley Project, Utah. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2006 

Mr. CANNON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To confirm as authorized, valid, and enforceable certain contractual rights of water users and water users organizations under the Strawberry Valley Project, Utah. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STRAWBERRY VALLEY PROJECT, UTAH WATER 

4 RIGHTS. 

5 The rights of water users and water users organiza6 tions under the Strawberry Valley Project, Utah, which 

7 are described in existing contracts of the United States 

8 are hereby confirmed as authorized, valid and enforceable 

9 according to their terms, including, but not limited to, the 
2 

•HR 4831 IH 

1 Strawberry Valley Project power rights described in the 

2 Regional Solicitor’s Opinion of July 30, 1986, 

3 LBR.IM.0290. 

Æ
AMENDMENT 5 TO SECOND LETTER




 Exhibit 10.28 
 October 20, 2010 

 

 

 David Cathcart 

Chief Financial Officer 
 TRX, Inc. 

2970 Clairmont Road 
 Suite 300 

Atlanta, GA 30329 
 Re: Amendment 5 to Second
Letter of Amendment 
 Dear David: 

The purpose of this letter is to amend the Second Letter of Amendment dated December 23, 2009 as amended on June 7, 2010, July 30,
2010, and August 30, 2010, and September 30, 2010. Effective October 20, 2010, Expedia and TRX now agree to amend the Second Letter of Amendment as follows: 
 Section 3 is hereby deleted and replaced with the following: 
 3)
Renewal of Pricing and Exclusivity for 2011. The pricing and exclusivity terms set forth in Section 1 and Section 2 of this Second Letter of Amendment will automatically be extended for calendar year 2011 unless either Party gives
the other Party written notice of non-renewal of such terms on or before October 31, 2010. If such notice is given, Section 1 and Section 2 will cease to apply, effective December 31, 2010, and the pricing terms under the
Agreement (and associated SOWs) that were in place prior to this Second Letter of Amendment will apply in calendar year 2011. 
 Please
acknowledge your agreement to the foregoing by signing in the space provided below and returning a signed copy to me as soon as possible. If you do not agree with any of the foregoing, please contact me as soon as possible so that we can determine
how best to proceed. 
  

	
	Yours truly,
	Expedia, Inc.
	
	/s/ Kerri Landeis
	Kerri Landeis
	Vice President, GSO


  

			
	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	
	TRX, Inc.


			
		
	By:	 	 /s/ David D. Cathcart



			
	Title:	 	 Chief Financial Officer



			
	Date Signed:	 	 20 October 2010
Exhibit 23 to 1998 10-K



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



Boundless Corporation

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  registration
statements of Boundless  Corporation on Form S-8 (File Nos.  33-95846,  33-81106
and  33-86896) of our report  dated  February 12, 1999 (except for Note 17 as to
which the date is April 14,  1999) on our audits of the  consolidated  financial
statements and schedules of Boundless Corporation and Subsidiaries, which report
is included in this Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31,
1998.




BDO Seidman, LLP


Melville, New York
April 15, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         379,336
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,107
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,598
<INVENTORY>                                    136,179
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               771,045
<PP&E>                                       9,198,786
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,588,320
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,806,809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          918,771
<BONDS>                                      4,573,539
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,492,673
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,063,372)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,806,809
<SALES>                                     15,219,412
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,219,412
<CGS>                                        1,570,474
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,678,664
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,333,602
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             644,227
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (203,080)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (203,080)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (203,080)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7003

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JIMMY CHESSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (2:12-cr-00027-BO-2; 2:17-cv00016-BO)

Submitted: December 29, 2017 Decided: January 18, 2018

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Chesson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Russell Pender, Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina; 

John Howarth Bennett, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, 

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Chesson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 

336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner 

must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the 

motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 

484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Chesson has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED