```

[Federal Register: July 1, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 126)]
[Proposed Rules]               
[Page 38061-38064]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr01jy10-26]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0644; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-204-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

 
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B4-600 Series 
Airplanes; Model A300 B4-600R Series Airplanes; Model A300 C4-605R 
Variant F Airplanes; and Model A300 F4-600R Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the 
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory 
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation 
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe 
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe 
condition as:

    Within the framework of the A300-600 aircraft Service Life 
Extension programme (42 500 FC [flight cycles]), it has been 
concluded that a reinforcement of the junction of frame bases at 
FR48, FR49 and FR51 to FR53 is necessary to enable the aircraft to 
reach the Extended Service Goal (ESG).

[[Page 38062]]

    * * * [Failure of the frame base], if not corrected, could 
affect the structural integrity of the fuselage.
* * * * *
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the 
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 16, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: (202) 493-2251.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact 
Airbus SAS-EAW (Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 
93 44 51; e-mail: account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may review copies of the referenced service 
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind 
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of 
this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office 
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory 
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street 
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is 
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket 
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, 
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 
227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or 
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address 
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-0644; 
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-204-AD'' at the beginning of your 
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, 
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We 
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend 
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We have lengthened the 30-day comment period for proposed ADs that 
address MCAI originated by aviation authorities of other countries to 
provide adequate time for interested parties to submit comments. The 
comment period for these proposed ADs is now typically 45 days, which 
is consistent with the comment period for domestic transport ADs.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We 
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we 
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical 
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA 
Airworthiness Directive 2009-0188, dated August 26, 2009 (referred to 
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the 
specified products. The MCAI states:

    Within the framework of the A300-600 aircraft Service Life 
Extension programme (42 500 FC [flight cycles]), it has been 
concluded that a reinforcement of the junction of frame bases at 
FR48, FR49 and FR51 to FR53 is necessary to enable the aircraft to 
reach the Extended Service Goal (ESG).
    * * * [Failure of the frame base], if not corrected, could 
affect the structural integrity of the fuselage.
    For the reasons described above, this AD requires the 
reinforcement of the affected junction of frame bases.

Required actions include doing a dimensional measurement of the holes, 
and doing corrective actions if necessary; doing an eddy current 
inspection of the holes for cracking, and doing corrective actions if 
necessary; and doing cold expansion of the holes and installing 
fasteners. Corrective actions include contacting Airbus for repair 
instructions and doing the repair. You may obtain further information 
by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Airbus has issued Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-53-6161, Revision 
02, including Appendix 01, dated October 16, 2009. The actions 
described in this service information are intended to correct the 
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another 
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant 
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have 
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service 
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we 
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition 
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same 
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in 
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it 
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the 
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these 
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information 
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those 
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are 
highlighted in a Note within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD 
would affect about 122 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that 
it would take about 81 work-hours per product to comply with the basic 
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per 
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $12,300 per product. Where 
the service information lists required parts costs that are covered 
under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these 
costs. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, 
some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these 
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to 
be $2,340,570, or $19,185 per product.

[[Page 38063]]

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation 
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's 
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not 
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship 
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed 
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies 
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to 
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2010-0644; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-
204-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by August 16, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620, 
B4-622, B4-605R, B4-622R; Model A300 C4-605R Variant F; Model F4-
605R and F4-622R airplanes; certificated in any category; on which 
modification 12699 has not been completed.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53: 
Fuselage.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) 
states:

    Within the framework of the A300-600 aircraft Service Life 
Extension programme (42 500 FC), it has been concluded that a 
reinforcement of the junction of frame bases at FR48, FR49 and FR51 
to FR53 is necessary to enable the aircraft to reach the Extended 
Service Goal (ESG).
    * * * [Failure of the frame base], if not corrected, could 
affect the structural integrity of the fuselage.
* * * * *

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this 
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the 
actions have already been done.

Actions

    (g) Except for airplanes identified in paragraph (h) of this AD: 
At the time specified in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, as 
applicable, reinforce the junctions of frame bases FR48, FR49, FR51, 
FR52 and FR53, which includes doing a dimensional measurement of the 
holes, doing an eddy current inspection of the holes for cracking, 
doing a cold expansion of the holes, installing fasteners, and doing 
applicable corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment 
Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-53-6161, 
Revision 02, dated October 16, 2009. If cracking is found, before 
further flight, contact Airbus for repair instructions and do the 
repair.
    (1) For airplanes on which Airbus Modification No. 03986 has 
been accomplished as of the effective date of this AD: Before the 
accumulation of 37,600 total flight cycles.
    (2) For airplanes on which Airbus Modification No. 03986 has not 
been accomplished as of the effective date of this AD: Before the 
accumulation of 28,900 total flight cycles.
    (h) For airplanes modified prior to the effective date of this 
AD in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus 
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-53-6161, dated February 13, 2009; or 
Revision 01, dated June 24, 2009: Within 10 days after the effective 
date of this AD, prior to doing any cold working process, determine 
if an eddy current inspection for cracking has been done, in 
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Mandatory 
Service Bulletin A300-53-6161, Revision 02, dated October 16, 2009. 
If the eddy current inspection has not been done, or it cannot be 
proven that it has been done, before further flight, contact Airbus 
for instructions and accomplish those instructions.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 1:  This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service 
information as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (i) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, 
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using 
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Dan 
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport 
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 
98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149. Before 
using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, 
notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal 
avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a principal 
inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office. The AMOC 
approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain 
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these 
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered 
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority 
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product 
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in 
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has 
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned 
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Related Information

    (j) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) 
Airworthiness Directive 2009-0188, dated August 26, 2009; and Airbus 
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-53-6161, Revision 02, dated October 
16, 2009; for related information.

[[Page 38064]]

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 23, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-15982 Filed 6-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```