alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TERM PROMISSORY NOTE

US$75,000
                                                 January 18, 1996
                                           Due:  January 17, 1997



     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promises to pay to or to
the order of JAVLEE INVESTMENTS LIMITED the sum of Seventy Five
Thousand Dollars ($75,000.00), plus interest as calculated below,
in lawful money of the United States of America.

     The principal amount outstanding under this note from time
to time shall bear interest at the variable per annum reference
rate of interest for United States dollar loans made by The Bank
of Nova Scotia in Canada (as announced and adjusted by such bank
from time to time), calculated monthly in arrears.

     At any time and from time to time any portion of the
principal outstanding hereunder may be prepaid without any notice
being given to the Holder and without any bonus or penalty being
paid to the Holder provided that all amounts, whether on account
of principal or interest, which are due and payable hereunder
have been paid.  Any such prepayment shall be applied to
principal instalments in inverse order of maturity.

     The undersigned hereby waives diligence, presentment,
demand, protest, and notice of any kind in enforcement of this
note and hereby agrees and consents to all extensions and
renewals thereof, without notice.

     This note and the rights and obligations of the parties
hereunder shall be construed in accordance with and governed by
the laws of the Province of Ontario.


WINDSOR ACQUISITION CORP.     


Per: /S/ Avi S. Greenspoon                                        
          









Path:  I:\W\WIND-ACQ\54375\WACUTAH\NTEPROM1.ASG
Faulk, Scott (OST) From: Sent: To: Subject: Donna Haytko-Paoa <dhp@hawaii.edu> Tuesday, December 10, 2013 6:53 PM EAS (OST) Support for Mokulele Airlines -Kalaupapa Service Bid .·.:;

'**~** ... ':-.:..

Aloha. I am writing this email in support ofMokulele Airlines even though I realize that the deadline for commenthas passed. Ijustwanted you to know the Mokulele Airlines has been a Godsend ever since Island Air cut way back on their service to Molokai. Island Air was the way inwhich our staffand instructors commuted back and forth to Kahului for meetings at the main campus ofUH Maui College. Many ofus also counted on Island Air for ourpersonal and business trips to the island ofOahu. As Island Air chose to focus onproviding service for the tourists to Lanai island, it was Mokulele Airlines that stepped in to meetthe Molokai residents needs. Mokulele has provided consistent, reliable, and necessary service. I expectthat they will do so for Kalaupapa as well ifthey should winthe bid. I am submitting this as a personal view which does not represent the University ofHawaii orthe State of Hawaii. However, I am signing withmy title to verify that I work for UH and as such, have a good deal of experience in inter-island air travel. Mahalo and aloha. Donna Haytko-Paoa Professor/Coordinator UHMaui College, Molokai

1
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-17-00717-CR

Wayne Edward WEIRICH,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6261

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED. 

SIGNED September 5, 2018.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

March 27, 2002



United States Securities And Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C.


To The Commission,

Pursuant to Securities And Exchange Commission ("SEC ") final rules, Release
No. 33-8070: Requirements for Arthur Andersen LLP Auditing Clients, VISX,
Incorporated ("VISX") states that it has received the following representation
from its independent public accountant, Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen"),
regarding Andersen's audit of VISX.

The audit of VISX, Incorporated as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001 was subject to Andersen's
quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with
professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen
personnel working on the audit, and availability of national office
consultation. Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen
was not relevant to this audit.

Sincerely,

VISX, Incorporated

/s/ Timothy R. Maier

Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-09-001] 

      ( print page 2100)    

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

United States International Trade Commission. 

# Time and Date:

January 21, 2009 at 2 p.m. 

# Place:

Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000. 

# Status:

Open to the public. 

# Matters to be Considered:

1. Agenda for future meetings: None. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Inv. No. 731-TA-1020 (Review) (Barium Carbonate from China)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before January 30, 2009.) 

5. Outstanding Action Jackets: None. 

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. 

By order of the Commission: 

Issued: January 8, 2009. 

William R. Bishop, 

Hearings and Meetings  Coordinator.

[FR Doc. E9-533 Filed 1-13-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                        SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997


This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 of Spice Entertainment Companies, Inc.
(formerly Graff Pay-Per-View Inc.)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000839431                      
<NAME>                        Spice Entertainment Companies, Inc.
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         2,810,000
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,336,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,601,000
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,633,000
<PP&E>                                         6,602,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,942,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                31,138,000 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         10,657,000
<BONDS>                                       15,085,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         107,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     8,849,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  31,138,000
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              33,596,000
<CGS>                                                  0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 31,172,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1,824,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,609,000 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,647,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     348,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4,299,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  143,000
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,442,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.36
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Brownie’s Marine Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:  August 16,
      2010
                  By:
                  /s/ Robert M. CarmichaelName:
                  Robert
      M. CarmichaelTitle:
                  Chief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Brownie’s Marine Group, Inc. and will be
retained by Brownie’s Marine Group, Inc. and furnished to the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Jawan HOLMES

No. COA18-1023

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 26, 2019

VACATED. REMANDED.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 529 

To authorize States, in the event of inadequate Federal funding under part 

B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, to waive certain 

requirements of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2005 

Mr. BUTTERFIELD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To authorize States, in the event of inadequate Federal funding under part B of the Individuals with Disabilities 

Education Act, to waive certain requirements of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Respecting Our Lead5 ers in Education Model Act of 2005’’ or ‘‘ROLE Model 

6 Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•HR 529 IH 

1 SEC. 2. FULL FUNDING OF PART B OF THE INDIVIDUALS 

2 WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT. 

3 (a) WAIVER AUTHORITY.—Subject to subsection (c), 

4 section 1116(b) of the Elementary and Secondary Edu5 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6316(b)) (relating to the 

6 identification of schools for school improvement, corrective 

7 action, or restructuring) shall not apply in a State if— 

8 (1) for any fiscal year the Federal Government 

9 appropriates for the purpose of carrying out part B 

10 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 

11 (20 U.S.C. 1411 et seq.) an amount that is less than 

12 the amount determined under subsection (b); and 

13 (2) the State chooses to waive the application of 

14 such section 1116(b). 

15 (b) AMOUNT.—The amount referred to in subsection 

16 (a)(1) is the product of— 

17 (1) the number of children with disabilities in 

18 all States who are receiving special education and re19 lated services— 

20 (A) aged 3 through 5 if the State is eligi21 ble for a grant under section 619; and 

22 (B) aged 6 through 21; and 

23 (2) 40 percent of the average per-pupil expendi24 ture in public elementary and secondary schools in 

25 the United States. 
3 

•HR 529 IH 

1 (c) LIMITATION.—For any fiscal year described in 

2 subsection (a)(1), a State may waive the application of 

3 section 1116(b) of the Elementary and Secondary Edu4 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6316(b)) for not more than 

5 3 consecutive school years, beginning with the school year 

6 that commences during the fiscal year involved. 

7 (d) CONTINUED FUNDING.—A State’s decision under 

8 this section to waive the provisions of section 1116(b) of 

9 the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 

10 U.S.C. 6316(b)) shall not affect the State’s eligibility for, 

11 or receipt of, funds under such Act. 

12 (e) STATE.—For purposes of this section, the term 

13 ‘‘State’’ has the meaning given to that term in section 

14 9101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 

15 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801). 

Æ
STATE of North Carolina v. Daniel Yair MARINO

No. 240P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

James R. Grant, Assistant Appellate Defender, Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, For Marino, Daniel Yair

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, Kristin Jo Uicker, Assistant Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina *69***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st of June 2019 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the Conditional petition filed by Defendant on the 9th of July 2019 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
TOWN OF LITTLETON v. LAYNE HEAVY CIVIL, INC. f/d/b/a Reynolds, Inc.; Layne Inliner, LLC f/d/b/a Reynolds Inliner, LLC; and Mack Gay Associates, P.A.

No. 322P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Patricia P. Shields, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Joshua D. Neighbors, Attorney at Law, Rod Malone, Attorney at Law, Kristopher Gardner, Attorney at Law, Linda H. Stephens, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Town of Littleton.

Walter E. Brock, Jr., Attorney at Law, Andrew P. Flynt, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Mack Gay Associates, P.A.

Leslie C. Packer, Attorney at Law, Stephen D. Feldman, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Steven A. Scoggan, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Layne Heavy Civil, Inc., et al.

Julia C. Ambrose, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th of September 2018 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,049,044
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,748
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,797
<INVENTORY>                                    201,493
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,515,134
<PP&E>                                       6,658,364
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,364,201
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,108,820
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,789,676
<BONDS>                                      5,153,266
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,495,175
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,514,693)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,108,820
<SALES>                                     14,467,437
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,467,437
<CGS>                                        1,575,076
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,057,676
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,252,880
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             639,719
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,451,321)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,451,321)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,451,321)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.61)


</TABLE>
No. 09-9618.

#### Christopher Leon Baker, Petitioner v. James A. Yates, Warden, et al.

560 U.S. 910, 130 S. Ct. 3288,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1194,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4055.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 339 Fed. Appx. 690.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JAMES GERARD BOYLE,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 23-2354

D.C. No.

2:11-cr-00454-RCJ-CWH-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 20, 2024**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, RAWLINSON, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

James Gerard Boyle appeals from the district court’s order denying his 

motion for early termination of supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1). 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

We need not resolve the parties’ dispute over whether this appeal is barred 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 23-2354

by the appeal waiver in Boyle’s plea agreement because, even assuming that the 

waiver does not apply, Boyle has not shown he is entitled to relief.

Contrary to Boyle’s assertion, the district court expressly considered his 

arguments, including his substantial compliance with the terms of his release. 

Nonetheless, the court concluded that early termination was unwarranted in light of 

Boyle’s violation of the terms of his supervision just one month after his release, 

his potential for recidivism, and the reasons asserted by the government. The court 

also emphasized that Boyle had agreed to a term of lifetime supervision, and 

“compliance with the conditions of supervised release is demanded—not 

rewarded.” The court sufficiently explained its reasons for denying Boyle’s

motion and did not abuse its broad discretion in denying relief. See 18 U.S.C.

§ 3583(e)(1); United States v. Emmett, 749 F.3d 817, 819-22 (9th Cir. 2014).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Full Circle Promotions, Inc. a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Neilan Vancas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Full Circle Promotions, Inc., and will be retained by Full Circle
Promotions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.




/s/ Neilan Vancas
--------------------------
Neilan Vancas
Chief Financial Officer
August 18, 2003
Exhibit 10.9.7

 

Executive Medical Plan of The Coca-Cola Company

 

The undersigned, being the Plan Administrator for the Executive Medical Plan of The Coca-Cola Company takes the following actions:

 

WHEREAS, The Coca-Cola Company (the “Company”) established the Executive Medical Plan of The Coca-Cola Company (the “Plan”); and

 

WHEREAS, Section 10 of the Plan reserves the right of the Plan Administrator to terminate the Plan at any time.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Executive Medical Plan of The Coca-Cola Company is terminated effective as of December 31, 2010;

 

FURTHER RESOLVED, that (i) the Plan Administrator and (ii) any officer of the Company is authorized to take any and all action that such person deems necessary, convenient or appropriate in order to carry out the intent and purpose of the preceding resolutions and to effectuate the transactions contemplated thereby; and

 

FURTHER RESOLVED, that (i) the Plan Administrator and (ii) any officer of the Corporation is authorized to execute, in the name and on behalf of the Corporation and under its corporate seal or otherwise, deliver and file any agreement, instrument, certificate or other document, or any amendment or supplement thereto, and to take any other action that such person may deem necessary, convenient or appropriate in order to carry out the intent and purpose of the preceding resolutions and to effectuate the transactions contemplated thereby.

 

 

	
 
    	
Plan   Administrator
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Executive   Medical Plan of The Coca-Cola Company
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/   Sue Fleming
    	
 
    	
November 18, 2010
    
	
 
    	
Sue   Fleming
    	
 
    	
Date
    
	
 
    	
Director,   Global Benefits
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
The   Coca-Cola Company