alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent to grant to Truston Technologies Inc., a revocable, nonassignable, non-exclusive license to practice in the field of use of                         *floating barrier systems*                         for industrial markets in the United States and certain foreign countries, for the Government-owned invention described in U.S. Patent No. 6,681,709, 6,843,197, 7,401,565 U.S. Patent Application 10/828,533 and any continuations, divisionals or re-issues thereof.                    

# DATES:

Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later than March 25, 2009.

# ADDRESSES:

Written objections are to be filed with the NAVFACESC, EV423, 1100 23rd Avenue, Port Hueneme, CA 93043-4370.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kurt Buehler, Head, Technology Transfer Office, NAVFACESC, EV423, 1100 23rd Avenue, Port Hueneme, CA 93043-4370,                         *telephone:*                         805-982-4897. Due to U.S. Postal delays, please                         *fax:*                         805-982-4832,                         *e-mail: kurt.buehler@navy.mil*                         or use courier delivery to expedite response.                    

(Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.)

Dated: March 4, 2009.

A.M. Vallandingham

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-5028 Filed 3-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 37 CFR Part 404.6, announcement is made of the availability for licensing of U.S. Patent No. U.S. 7,479,329 entitled “Polymerization of Aromatic Monomers Using Derivatives of Hematin” issued January 20, 2009. This patent has been assigned to the United States Government as represented by the Secretary of the Army.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Jeffrey DiTullio at U.S. Army Soldier Systems Center, Kansas Street, Natick, MA 01760, Phone; (508) 233-4184 or E-mail:                         *Jeffrey.Ditullio@natick.army.mil.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Any licenses granted shall comply with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR Part 404.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

 [FR Doc. E9-5461 Filed 3-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
No. 09-830.

#### Balmoris Alexander Contreras-Martinez, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

560 U.S. 903, 130 S. Ct. 3274,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1182,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3983.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 346 Fed. Appx. 956.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0566

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

AUSTIN JOSEPH SCHNEIDERHAHN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 8, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 30 2021

09/30/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0566
ex10_159.htm











 Exhibit  10.159


 


Guarantor Supplement


 


December 31, 2010







Bank of Montreal, as Administrative Agent for the Banks party to the Term Loan Agreement dated as of May 15, 2009 among Alliance Data Systems Corporation, the Guarantors from time to time party thereto, the Banks from time to time party thereto, and Bank of Montreal, as Administrative Agent (as the same may be amended, restated or supplemented from time to time, the “Term Loan Agreement”)







Ladies and Gentlemen:







Reference is made to the Term Loan Agreement described above.  Terms not defined herein which are defined in the Term Loan Agreement shall have for the purposes hereof the meaning provided therein.







The undersigned, Alliance Data Retail Services, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, hereby acknowledges that it is a “Guarantor” for all purposes of the Term Loan Agreement, effective from the date hereof.  The undersigned confirms that the representations and warranties set forth in Article 4 of the Term Loan Agreement are true and correct in all material respects as to the undersigned as of the date hereof (other than any representation or warranty that relates to a specified date, which shall be true and correct in all material respects as of such date).







Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the undersigned hereby agrees to perform all the obligations of a Guarantor under, and to be bound in all respects by the terms of, the Term Loan Agreement, including, without limitation, Article 9 thereof, to the same extent and with the same force and effect as if the undersigned were a direct signatory thereto.







This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the internal laws of the State of New York.







[Signature Page Follows]









  





  











  












	  	
Very truly yours,


	  	  	  
	  	
ALLIANCE DATA RETAIL SERVICES, LLC


	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	  	
By:

	
/s/ Hugh M. Hayden


	  	
Name:

	
Hugh M. Hayden


	  	
Title:

	
Senior Vice President
STATE v. Donald Durrant FARROW

341P12-8

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Donald Durrant Farrow, for Farrow, Donald Durrant.

Sherri Horner Lawrence, Assistant Attorney General, Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd of January 2019 by Defendant for Appropriate Relief:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Ervin, J. recused
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Donald
J. Percenti, President and Chief Executive Officer of American Achievement Group
Holding Corp., ACC Group Holding Corp. and American Achievement Corporation (the
“Companies”), hereby certify that:





(1) The
Quarterly Report of the Companies on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31,
2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.





Date:
July 15, 2008





/s/
      DONALD J. PERCENTIName:
            
            Donald
      J. PercentiTitle:
            
            President
      and Chief Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer)
Exhibit 99.77D


Code of Ethics for CEO and Finance Leaders

In my financial leadership role with Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc, I
recognize that I hold an important and elevated role in corporate governance.
I am charged with ensuring that stakeholders' interests are appropriately
balanced, protected and preserved. Accordingly, this Code provides principles
to which I am expected to adhere.

To the best of my knowledge and ability, in executing my job responsibilities:

1. I act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts of
interest.

2. I provide internal and external constituents with appropriate and
objective information that is full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable.

3. I act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, competence and diligence,
without misrepresenting material facts or allowing my independent judgment to
be compromised.

4. I respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of my
work except when authorized or otherwise legally obligated to disclose. I
will not use confidential information acquired in the course of my work for
personal advantage.

5. I proactively promote ethical behavior as a responsible partner among
others in my work environment. I understand my accountability for adhering to
this code and my responsibility to report violations of this code to the
Audit Committee or other appropriate officials in accordance with Willamette
Valley Vineyard's Employee Handbook and Policies.

6. I exercise responsible stewardship over company assets and resources and
maintain appropriate internal controls.
exv10w14






EXHIBIT 10.14



PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT MARKED BY AN (***) HAVE BEEN OMITTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.




AMENDMENT



This amendment amends and is governed by the Global Agreement with an effective date of January 1,
2004 between Amadeus IT Group, S.A. (“Amadeus”) and Ebookers PLC (“EBOOKERS”), as amended,
(together referred to as “the Agreement”) and is effective as of 1st of May 2010. All capitalized
terms and conditions herein have the definitions as provided in the Agreement or as otherwise
indicated herein.





	1.	 	For the time period 1st of May 2010 to and including 30th of June
2011, the reference to “(***) MPS Transactions” which appears twice in Section VI of
Schedule “A” to the Complimentary and Amendment Agreement dated 1st of July 2009,
is changed in both instances to “(***) MPS Transactions.” For clarification,
“(***) MPS Transactions” will apply again in both instances as of 1st of
July 2011.






	2.	 	All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect except as
modified by the above.




Agreed and Accepted:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	Amadeus IT Group, S.A.	 	EBOOKERS LTD
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Stephane Durand	 	/s/ Tamer Tamar
	 	 	 
	Signature	 	Signature
	Name:

	 	Stephane Durand
	 	Name:
	 	Tamer Tamar
	Title:

	 	Director, Online & Leisure
	 	Title:
	 	President
	Date:

	 	22/12/2010
	 	Date:
	 	16/12/2010
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6945** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. DANIEL REKUS GIBERT , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Anderson
. Timothy M. Cain , District Judge. ( 8:09

- cr - 00438

- TMC

- 1; 8:14

- cv - 02641

- TMC )

Submitted : November 17 , 2015 Decided: November 19, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN , and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Daniel Rekus Gibert, Appellant Pro Se. Maxwell B. Cauthen, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Da niel Rekus Gibert seeks to appeal the district court’s order s dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion . The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of a ppealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2012)
. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gibert has not made the requisite showing. See Day v. McDonough , 547 U.S. 198, 209

- 10 (2006) (permitting sua sponte consideration of timeliness of postconviction motio n provided “court . . . accord[s] the parties fair notice and an3 opportunity to present their positions”); see Hill v. Braxton , 277 F.3d 701, 706 (4th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-78,099-01

EX PARTE GUADALUPE LOPEZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 10-10-06789-MCRAJA IN THE 365 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM MAVERICK COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of

marihuana and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

abandoned the negotiated cap on sentencing and argued for shock probation without determining

whether Applicant was eligible for release to shock probation. 

The trial court has determined that trial counsel, retained for sentencing, did not know that

Applicant was ineligible for shock probation, and that he did not review the Code of Criminal
2

Procedure’s requirements for shock probation before arguing for the same at sentencing. The trial

court also found that, had counsel not pursued shock probation in exchange for an abandonment of

the previously negotiated cap, the trial court would not have exceeded that cap in sentencing

Applicant. We find that counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Relief is granted. The sentence in

Cause No. 10-10-06789-MCRAJA in the 365 District Court of Maverick County is set aside, and th

Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Maverick County for re-sentencing in

accordance with the original plea agreement, which the trial court is ordered to re-instate. The trial

court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: March 12, 2014

Do not publish
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Mary Jane Robertson, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       Date: November 1, 2007 By: /s/ *Mary Jane Robertson*           Mary Jane Robertson    Executive Vice President,    Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial  information  extracted from the balance
sheets and statements of income and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         1,729,305
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    178,021
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0
<PP&E>                                         4,089,096
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,695,392
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  0
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,529,832
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,695,395
<SALES>                                          166,969
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,911,086
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,537,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 330,939
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,373,906
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,373,906
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,373,906
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      10.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      10.74
        


</TABLE>
exhibit10-113.htm










EXHIBIT 10-113


 


EXHIBIT B




 


 


   JMJ Financial




San Diego, CA


Miami, FL












                                                                                                                                             



















February 22, 2011







Imaging Diagnostic Systems, Inc.


Boca Raton, FL












This letter is to confirm the following regarding A-02222011a:







Authorized Shares.  I am aware that the company is out of authorized shares, and that Section 2.5 of our agreement, Reservation of Shares, will be enforced only after an increase in shares authorized is completed.  By way of the third bullet point on the Funding Schedule, you agree that authorized shares will be increased to 2,000,000,000 in order to allow for shares to be issued for conversion of A-02222011a.












DWAC Electronic Transfer.  The fact that the Company is not currently able to electronically transfer shares via DWAC makes this transaction exceptionally difficult, cumbersome, and risky.  Therefore, you agree that:








	
§  

	
You agree to apply for DWAC electronic transfer within 3 business days of execution of this agreement (at your own expense).













	
§  

	
You agree that as long as the Company is not able to electronically DWAC shares, that JMJ Financial may, at its election, indefinitely stall or cancel (without penalty or liability) any payments described in the Funding Schedule.  Even in the event that JMJ elects to stall any payments, the Company must progress with the registration statement for all payments as set forth in the Funding Schedule (past payments and potential future payments).







 


 




 







/s/ Justin Keener                                                      2-23-2011


JMJ Financial / Its Principal

















BORROWER[S]:                                                                           












/s/ Linda B. Grable                                                  2-23-2011


Linda Grable


Chairwoman & CEO


Imaging Diagnostic Systems, Inc.

















/s/ Allan L. Schwartz                                               2-23-2011


Allan Schwartz


CFO


Imaging Diagnostic Systems, Inc.