alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed June 29, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-45

Lower Tribunal No. F16-6366

________________

Jorge Fabian Feliciano Ramos,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Andrea R. 

Wolfson, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Andrew Stanton, Assistant 

Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael W. Mervine, Chief 

Assistant Attorney General, and Brian H. Zack, Assistant Attorney General,

for appellee.

Before LOGUE, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Jorge Fabian Feliciano Ramos appeals a final judgment of conviction 
2

and sentence for attempted second-degree murder with a firearm and 

possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. We affirm the judgment without 

discussion and write only to address a scrivener’s error within it. See Ashley 

v. State, 850 So. 2d 1265, 1268 n.3 (Fla. 2003) (defining scrivener’s error as

written clerical error that is not “the result of a judicial determination or error”). 

The judgment erroneously lists the attempted second-degree murder with a 

firearm conviction as a life felony when it is a felony of the first degree.1 The 

state properly concedes error. We therefore remand for the correction of the 

scrivener’s error and affirm in all other respects. The defendant need not be 

present for this ministerial correction of the judgment. See Lowery v. State, 

294 So. 3d 464 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020).

Affirmed; Remanded with instructions.

1 Attempted second degree murder is a second-degree felony. § 782.04(2), 

Fla. Stat.; § 777.04(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (2016). The use of a firearm reclassifies 

this offense to a first-degree felony. § 775.087(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2016).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                        0
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        337,048
<DEPRECIATION>                115,027
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                1,213,406
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         5,189,709
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      159,194
<OTHER-SE>                    380,465
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  1,213,406
<SALES>                       382,798
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              382,798
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 1,840,523
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            118,986
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (1,575,849)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (1,575,849)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (1,575,849)
<EPS-BASIC>                 (1.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (1.07)



</TABLE>
**Incorporation by Reference Docket ID No. EPA**  **- HQ**  **- OAR** **- 2009**  **- 0927** 

**April 1, 2013** The contents of the following dockets are hereb y incorporated b y reference into and are considered to be included in, contained in and to have been placed in Docket EPA - HQ - OAR 2009 - 0927 (Additional Sources of Fluorinated Gases): 1) EPA

–HQ

– OAR

–2011

– 0028 (Proposed Confidentiality Determinations for 9 Subparts and Proposed Amendments and Confidentiality Determinations for Subpart I ) 2) EPA

–HQ

– OAR

–2011

– 0147 (Technical Corrections, Clari fy ing and Other Amendments to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule, and Proposed Confidentiality Determinations for Certain Data Elements of the Fluorinated Gas Source Category) 3) EPA - HQ - OAR - 2011 - 0512 (Technical Revisions for Subparts I and W of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule and Electronics Manufacturing: Revisions to Heat Transfer Fluid Provisions ) 4) EPA - HQ - OAR - 2012 - 0934 ( 2013 Technical Corrections, Clarifying, and Other Amendments to Certain Provisions of the Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule ) Accessing dockets: Publicly available docket materials are available either electronicall y through www.regulations.gov or in hard cop y at EPA’s Docket Center, Public Reading Room, EPA West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004. This Docket Facilit y is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday , excluding legal holiday s. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566 - 1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566 - 1742.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5217]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER99-2923-005]


Phelps Dodge Energy Services, LLC; Notice of Filing

March 2, 2009.
    Take notice that on February 13, 2009, Phelps Dodge Energy 
Services, LLC filed a compliance filing to revise its Market-based Rate 
Tariff, pursuant to Order No. 697.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cd8b889f8e82a3a1a4a3a89eb8bdbda2bfb98daba8bfaee3aaa2bb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="edaba8bfaea28381848388be989d9d829f99ad8b889f8ec38a829b">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 6, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-5217 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
D. Cameron MURCHISON, Jr. and Joan H. Murchison, his wife v. REGIONAL SURGICAL SPECIALISTS and Christopher Edwards, M.D.

No. 251P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

W. Bradford Searson, Attorney at Law, Asheville, for Murchison, D. Cameron (Jr.), et al.

Rodney S. Margol, Attorney at Law, for Murchison, D. Cameron (Jr.), et al.

Isaac N. Northup, Jr., Attorney at Law, Asheville, for Regional Surgical Specialists, et al.

Elizabeth E. McConnell, Attorney at Law, Asheville, for Regional Surgical Specialists, et al.

Adam Peoples, Attorney at Law, Asheville, for Regional Surgical Specialists, et al.

K. Edward Greene, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Murchison, D. Cameron (Jr.), et al.

Paul J. Puryear, Jr., Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Murchison, D. Cameron (Jr.), et al.

*836***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th of June 2019 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Ervin, J. recused
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that two meetings of the Arts Advisory Panel to the National Council on the Arts will be held by teleconference from the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20506. These meetings are being scheduled on an emergency basis to review applications for funding under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 as follows (ending times are approximate):

*State & Regional Partnerships #1:*                     March 25, 2009. This meeting, from 12 p.m. to 2 p.m., will be open.                

*State & Regional Partnerships #2:*                     March 25, 2009. This meeting, from 3 p.m. to 4:30 p.m., will be open.                          ( print page 10624)    

Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory panels that are open to the public, and if time allows, may be permitted to participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion of the panel chairman. If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please contact the Office of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, 202/682-5532, TDY-TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.

Further information with reference to these meetings can be obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC, 20506, or call 202/682-5691.

Dated: March 6, 2009.

Kathy Plowitz-Worden,

Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.

[FR Doc. E9-5271 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp., (the“Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mary Jane Robertson, Executive Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asenacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: May 2, 2006 By:  /s/*Mary Jane Robertson *    Mary Jane Robertson    Executive Vice President,
## TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT:

ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT:

High-Intensity Discharge Lamps Analysis of Potential Energy Savings

Docket #: EE-DET-03-001

June 2010

U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Building Technologies Program Appliances and Commercia l Equipment Standards Washington, DC 20585
STATE of North Carolina v. Timothy A. NOBLE

No. 12P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Ann B. Petersen, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Noble, Timothy A.

James R. Glover, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Amy Kunstling Irene, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ernie Lee, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th of January 2019 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*705"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."
| 1.   | The Quarterly Report of the Companies on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 28, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                   |                                                               |   |   |
|--------|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |                   |                                                               |
|   | /s/ DONALD J. PERCENTI |                                                               |
|   | Name:        | Donald J. Percenti                                                 |   |
|   | Title:       | President and Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer) |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CAPITAL
GROWTH, INC. DECEMBER 31, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             996
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   996
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     996
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,748
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (78,752)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       996
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,438
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,438)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,438)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,438)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)
        

</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

IH/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUIS RAMIREZ-RODRIGUEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-70059

Agency No. A092-121-423

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 16, 2010** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Luis Ramirez-Rodriguez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction pursuant to

FILED

FEB 26 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
IH/Research 2 07-70059

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Morales-Alegria v.

Gonzales, 449 F.3d 1051, 1053 (9th Cir. 2006), and due process claims, SanchezCruz v. INS, 255 F.3d 775, 779 (9th Cir. 2001). We deny in part and dismiss in

part the petition for review.

Ramirez-Rodriguez’s contention that a conviction under Cal. Penal Code

§ 422 does not categorically constitute a crime of violence is foreclosed by

Rosales-Rosales v. Ashcroft, 347 F.3d 714, 717 (9th Cir. 2003).

Ramirez-Rodriguez’s contention that the IJ violated his due process rights

by refusing to continue his immigration proceedings fails because he did not

establish good cause for a continuance. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29; Lata v. INS, 204

F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error for a due process violation).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Ramirez-Rodriguez’s remaining contentions 

because he failed to exhaust them before the agency. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358

F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
Vernell J. LOGGINS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 104516

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: October 24, 2017 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied December 19, 2017

FOR APPELLANT: Rosemary E. Percival, Office of the State Public Defender, 920 Main Street, Ste. 500, Kansas City, MO 64105-2017.

FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Vernell J. Loggins, Jr. appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for *54post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Miscellaneous Docket No. 903 ZOLTEK CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Respondent,
v. UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Respondent,
v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION,

Defendant-Petitioner. On Petition for Permission to Appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) from the United States Court of Federal Claims in case no. 96-CV-166,

Judge Edward J. Damich.
ORDER Upon consideration of Zoltek Corporation's unopposed motion for an extension of time, until June 15, 2009, to file its response to Lockheed Martin Corporation's petition for permission to appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT 

# JUN - 8 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv Date Jan Horbaly Clerk 

# "V It

ta ?Mr POR

JUN 0 8 2009

CLERKcc: Richard T. Ruzich, Esq.

Gary L. Hausken, Esq. Dean A. Monco, Esq.

2009-M903 2
IN RE: E.H.P. and K.L.P.

70A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 29, 2019

Annick I. Lenoir-Peek, Deputy Parent Defender, Wendy C. Sotolongo, Parent Defender, for Pressley, William Howard.

Beverly Cook, Attorney at Law, for Culbreth, Eva Lynnette.

Stephanie McKeon, Attorney Advocate /GAL, for E.H.P.

Linda S. Fowler, Attorney Advocate /GAL, for K.L.P.

*429The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of March 2019 by Respondent (Father) to Amend Record on Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of March 2019."
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 22160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9575]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7397]

Advisory Committee on the Secretary of State's Strategic Dialogue 
With Civil Society; Notice of the Establishment of an Advisory 
Committee

    This is notice of the establishment of the Advisory Committee on 
the Secretary of State's Strategic Dialogue with Civil Society 
(hereinafter ``the Committee''). The Committee will provide advice and 
assistance in the formulation of U.S. policies, proposals, and 
strategies for engagement with, and protection of, civil society 
worldwide. Functions of the Committee include, but are not limited to: 
(a) Providing information and advice on the effective integration of 
civil society into overall foreign policy; and (b) providing 
information and advice on the Department of State's role in advancing, 
promoting, and protecting freedom of association and expression. The 
objective of the Committee is to bring to the United States government 
a source of expertise, knowledge, and insight not available within the 
Department or elsewhere in the government on these issues. The 
Committee serves in a solely advisory capacity.
    The membership of the Committee will consist of representatives who 
are leaders of U.S. and foreign civil society and U.S. and foreign 
businesses engaged with civil society. They may include: Leaders of 
independent public policy advocacy organizations, non-profit 
organizations that defend human rights and promote democracy, 
humanitarian organizations, private foundations and funds, charitable 
trusts, societies, associations and non-profit corporations. It is 
anticipated that the Committee will meet at least annually. The 
Department affirms that this advisory committee is necessary and in the 
public interest.
    For further information, please call Tomicah S. Tillemann, Senior 
Adviser for Civil Society and Emerging Democracies, U.S. Department of 
State, at civilsociety@state.gov.

    Dated: April 13, 2011.
Tomicah S. Tillemann
Senior Adviser for Civil Society and Emerging Democracies, U.S. 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-9575 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```