alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.3

CONSULTING AGREEMENT

        THIS AGREEMENT (this "Agreement"), dated the 23rd day of November,2001, between JOHN CULLEN, an individual residing at 37 Amelia Street, Barrie,Ontario L4M 1M5 ("Consultant"), and BIOGAN INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delawarecorporation having an office at 150 King Street West, Suite 2315, Toronto,Ontario Canada M5H 1J9 ("Biogan"). 

RECITALS:

        WHEREAS, Consultant is a director of Biogan; and

        WHEREAS, Consultant has had access to, and has gained knowledge with respectto, the business of Biogan; and

        WHEREAS, Consultant possesses expertise in financial and capital marketmatters which benefits the business of Biogan; and

        WHEREAS, Biogan and Consultant each desire Consultant to provide consultingservices to Biogan.

        NOW, THEREFORE, Consultant and Biogan agree as follows:

        1.    Consulting Commitment. Biogan hereby engages Consultant, andConsultant agrees, to provide consulting services to Biogan. Consultant shallprovide consulting services on such terms and conditions as are from time totime mutually agreed upon by Consultant and Biogan.

        2.    Consideration. In consideration of the services to berendered by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, Biogan agrees to pay toConsultant Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000) per month.

        3.    Termination. This agreement may be terminated upon 5 dayswritten notice by either party.

        4.    Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed under andin accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.

        5.    Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon andinure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs,executors, administrators, legal representatives, successors, and assigns wherepermitted by this Agreement.

        6.    Severability. In case any one or more of the provisionscontained in this Agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal,or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, orunenforceability shall not affect any other provision hereof, and this Agreementshall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision hadnever been contained herein.

        7.    Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entireagreement of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter of thisAgreement, and supersedes any prior understandings or written or oral agreementsbetween the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement.

|   |                                                    |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   | ___________________________________    John Cullen      |
|   |                                                    |
|   |                                                    |
|   | **BIOGAN INTERNATIONAL, INC.**                          |
|   |                                                    |
|   |                                                    |
|   | By:_________________________________    Name:    Title: |
STATE v. Jennifer JIMENEZ/April Myers

22P19-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

April Myers, For Jimenez, Jennifer

James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th of June 2019 by Defendant to Recall Order for Arrest; Failure to Appear; Strike Called and Failed; and to Set Aside Bond Forfeiture:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
STATE of Georgia et al. v. INTERNATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY et al.

Regulatory Technologies, Inc. v. State of Georgia.

A17A1195. A17A1196.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

July 24, 2019

Isaac Byrd, Christopher Michael Carr, Daniel Stephen Walsh, Jeffrey William Stump, Atlanta, for Appellant.

Thomas J. Gallo, Richard L. Robbins, Atlanta, L. Rachel Lerman, Brian Casey, Alexander Fraser Denton, for Appellee.

McFadden, Chief Judge.

The decision of this court in *State of Ga. v. International Indemnity Company* , 343 Ga. App. 647, 809 S.E.2d 64 (2017) has been affirmed in part and reversed in part by the Supreme Court of Georgia in *State of Ga. v. International Indemnity Company* , 305 Ga. 126, 823 S.E.2d 806 (2019). Accordingly, the parts of our decision that have been reversed are hereby vacated, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's judgment.

*Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and case remanded.*

Gobeil and Coomer, JJ., concur.
1 The Honorable David S. Doty, United Stat es District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-3640

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Daniel McNeal, also known as * District of Minnesota. Diamond, also known as Daddy, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 1, 2008 Filed: December 4, 2008

___________ Before MELLOY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Daniel McNeal pleaded guilty to sex tra fficking of a minor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1591, and transporting a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a). Determining that he qualified as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1(a) and that a downward departure was not warranted, the district court 1 sentenced McNeal to a within -Guidelines-range sentence of 293-2- months in prison. McNeal appeals, argui ng that the court did not properly consider the nature and circumstances of his offenses or his history and characteristics. Contrary to this argument, the record re flects that the district court made “an individualized assessment based on the fact s presented,” specifically addressing all of McNeal’s proffered information in its consideration of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, and we conclude that the sentence was not unreasonable. SeeGall v. United States , 128 S. Ct. 586, 597 (2007) (in re viewing sentence for abuse of discretion, appeals court must first ensurethere was no significant procedural error, and then assess substantive reasonablene ss of sentence); United States v. Haack , 403 F.3d 997, 1004 (8th Cir. 2005) (listing circ umstances that may warrant finding of abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm the sentence. We deny McNeal’s motions to expand the record and to file a pro se brie f supplementing his counsel’s brief, see United States v. Clark , 409 F.3d 1039, 1041 n.2 (8th Cir. 2005).

______________________________
No. 09-9557.

#### William Barfield Bowie, Petitioner v. North Carolina.

559 U.S. 1111, 130 S. Ct. 2413,

176 L. Ed. 2d 932,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3802.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the Superior Court of North Carolina, Catawba County, denied.
Exhibit
      32.1








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. § 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63
      of
      Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of The
      Tube Media Corp. (the "Company") does hereby certify with respect to the
      Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June
      30,
      2005 (the "Report") that:





1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






Date: July
              20, 2006
            
            /s/ David
              C.
              LevyName:
              David C. LevyTitle:
              Chief Executive Officer




Date: July
              20, 2006
            
            /s/ Celestin SpodenName:
              Celestine F. SpodenTitle:
              Chief Financial Officer







The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
      States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
      disclosure document.




36
IB 

Union Calendar No. 349 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5347 

[Report No. 109–605] 

To reauthorize the HOPE VI program for revitalization of public housing 

projects. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2006 

Mr. SHAYS (for himself, Ms. WATERS, Mr. LEACH, Mr. WATT, Mr. DAVIS of 

Alabama, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. FORD, Mr. WEXLER, Mrs. 

CHRISTENSEN, Mr. EVANS, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. OWENS, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Mr. 

PAYNE, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. MILLER of North Carolina, Mr. COOPER, 

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. UPTON, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. CONYERS, and Mr. HOLT) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

JULY 27, 2006 

Additional sponsors: Mr. CASTLE, Ms. HARRIS, and Mr. RENZI

JULY 27, 2006 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the HOPE VI program for revitalization of 

public housing projects. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5347 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘HOPE VI Reauthor5 ization Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAM. 

7 Section 24 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 

8 (42 U.S.C. 1437v) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (m)(1), by striking ‘‘fiscal 

10 year 2003’’ and inserting ‘‘each of fiscal years 2007 

11 through 2011’’; and 

12 (2) in subsection (o), by striking ‘‘September 

13 30, 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2011’’. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS

rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 349 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5347 

[Report No. 109

–605] 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the HOPE VI program for 

revitalization of public housing projects. 

JULY 27, 2006 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5175 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5175

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the Secretary of 
  the Treasury to disclose taxpayer identity information through mass 
       communications to notify persons entitled to tax refunds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2006

  Mr. Doggett (for himself and Mr. Sherman) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the Secretary of 
  the Treasury to disclose taxpayer identity information through mass 
       communications to notify persons entitled to tax refunds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``IRS Refund Accessibility Act of 
2006''.

SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE OF TAXPAYER IDENTITY FOR TAX REFUND PURPOSES.

    Paragraph (1) of section 6103(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to disclosure of taxpayer identity information for tax 
refunds) is amended by inserting ``, and through any other means of 
mass communication,'' after ``media''.
                                 <all>
```
Regrigerant circuit# I HF>-1 PS 

~ KD 

~ t 

~I t MU.2 

EXP 

-+-

KK 

110 

HP.1 

PS 

MU·t 

OP 

VB:1 

KD 

C0:2 

SV:t 

SV:2 

FD 

MU·2 

SG 

SGHX 

EXP 

EV 

GT.2 

COMPRESSOR 

CRANK CASE HEATER 

HIGH PRESSURES TAT 

PRESSURE SENSOR 

SERVICEVALVEHP 

OtL PRESSURE SIMTCH 

FLEXIBLE TUBE 

CONDENSER 

2·STAGE CHANGE 0VE R VALVE 

SAFETY PRESSURE VALVE 

SAFETY PRESSURE VALVE 

FILTER DRIER 

SERVICE VALVE LIQUID LINE 

SIGHT GLASS 

SUCTION GAS HEAT EXCHANGER 

EXPANSION VALVE 

EVAPORATOR 

FREEZE PROTECTION 

MU:2 

C0:2 

sv·J 

SV:4 

SGHX 

VB:2 

MU:3 

MU·4 

LP:1 

A•w••rutdm.it#l .......... diWitll) •••fafft,fll ci«uit • 4 

P.1 

P:2 

vc·• 

VC:2 

CV.1 

CV:2 

FL 

GT 1 

GT.2 

GT:3 

MP·t 

vc.s 

MP:1 

CIRCULATION PUMP 

CIRCULATION PUMP 

BUTTERFLY VALVE 

BUTTERFLY VALVE 

CHECK VALVE 

CHECK VALVE 

FLOW SENSOR 

TEMPERATLRE SENSOR 

TEMPERATLRE SENSORANITFREEZE 

TEMPERATURE SENSOR 

HEAD FLUID PRESSURE 

CUT OFF VALVE 

VB:1 

VB:2 

VB:3 

VB:4 

SV:S 

MP:2 

BP:1 

VC.6 

EXP 

ve·s VB:6 

VB:7 

SERVICE VALVE SOCTION UNE 

2-STAGECHANGE OVER VALVE 

SAFETY PRESSURE VALVE 

SAFETY PRESSURE VALVE 

SUCTION GAS HEAT EXCHANGER 

FLEXIBLE TUBE 

SERVICE VALVE LP 

SERVICE VALVE LP 

LOWPRESSURESTAT 

FLUID FILUI\0/DRAIN VALVE 

FLUID FILUI\0/DRAIN VALVE 

CUTOFF VALVE DRAIN 

CUT OFF VALVE DRAIN 

SAFETY VALVE 

SUCTION FLUID PRESS LRE 

FLUID PRESSURE SENSOR SAFETY 

CUT OFF VALVE 

EXPANSION VESSEL 

CUT OFF VALVE 

CUT OFF VALVE 

CUT OFF VALVE 

GT:t 

--~~ FLAN:>E 1 :a· I;;-· I :a· I I I 1;;;;~.. I;;;,..,., DN80 

$ Frigadon FWC-2000/3000-

5(8)-HC 

( __ ... _ 

K0110-K1 

P40 o#'Wie....._ 

HC_tt-_fPI_b
No. 09-8571.

#### Donnie Don Beverley, Petitioner v. Gene M. Johnson, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

559 U.S. 1012, 130 S. Ct. 1892,

176 L. Ed. 2d 374,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2696.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 333 Fed. Appx. 732.
Exhibit 15.12







RSM Richter Chamberland LLP


2 Place Alexis Nihon


Montréal, Quebec H3Z 3C2








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




To the Board of Directors of Copernic Inc.




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-102792) and the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-117794) of Copernic Inc. of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Report dated March 27, 2009, except for note 4 which is dated June 30, 2009, which appear in this Annual Report to shareholders on Form 20-F.





s/s RSM Richter Chamberland LLP


Chartered Accountants


Montreal, Canada


March 26, 2010
STATE of North Carolina v. Kenneth Eugene HARDEN

No. COA18-999

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 21, 2019

NO ERROR.
EXHIBIT
      32.2




Written
      Statement of Principal Financial Officer Furnished Pursuant to


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


as
      Adopted by


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of HouseRaising, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. von
      Gnechten, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of
      my
      knowledge, that:




(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition as of September 30, 2007 and results of operations
      for
      the quarter ended September 30, 2007 of the Company and its
      subsidiaries.






/s/
                Richard A. von GnechtenRichard
                A. von GnechtenChief
                Financial Officer (Principal Financial
                Officer)





November
      14, 2007





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D22-2408 

LT Case No. 2019-CA-001779-A 

_____________________________ 

RACHELLE VANDORN F/K/A

RACHELLE MARTIN, 

Appellant,

v. 

DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST 

COMPANY AMERICAS, JOSEPH B.

MARTIN, HERITAGE PARK OF ST.

AUGUSTINE HOMEOWNERS 

ASSOSICATION, INC., DCS

MORTAGE INC., AND LIONSTONE,

LLC, 

Appellees. 

_____________________________ 

On appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County. 

Kenneth J. Janesk, Judge. 

Rachelle Vandorn, Valley Center, pro se. 

No Appearance for Appellees. 

October 3, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

EDWARDS, C.J., JAY, and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur. 
2 

_____________________________ 

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>    1
       
<S>                                           <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-mos
<CASH>                                            592,001
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     305,044
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  933,483
<PP&E>                                          9,552,336
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,739,051
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  9,144,952
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             606,090
<BONDS>                                         4,574,933
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                      2,416,610
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    9,144,952
<SALES>                                         1,937,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,955,397
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     871,550
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  390,976
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                389,586
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    80,871
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                80,871
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       80,871
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted March 10, 2005

Decided March 28, 2005

Before

Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge

Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

No. 05-1606

RAMON F. CASTELLANOS,

Applicant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

On Motion for an Order Authorizing

the District Court to Entertain a

Second or Successive Motion for

Collateral Review

O R D E R

Ramon Castellanos has filed his third application pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2244(b)(3) for an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or

successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See No. 04-3394 (7th Cir. Sept. 20, 2004)

(dismissing application because proposed claim under Blakely v. Washington, 124 S.

Ct. 2531 (2004), was premature); No. 00-3241 (7th Cir. Sept. 29, 2000) (denying in

part and dismissing in part application proposing a claim under Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000)). Castellanos now renews his proposed Blakely claim and

adds a citation to United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). Booker does not

make the Blakely rule retroactive, and in fact does not announce whether its new

rule applying Blakely to the sentencing guidelines is itself applicable to cases on

collateral review under § 2255 ¶8(2). The proposed claim is premature. Simpson v.

United States, 376 F.3d 679 (7th Cir. 2004).

Accordingly, we DISMISS without prejudice Castellanos’ application for

leave to commence a successive collateral attack. He may renew the application if
No. 00-3095 Page 2

the Supreme Court makes the Booker rule retroactive.
Eric DENNEY, and wife Christine Denney v. WARDSON CONSTRUCTION, INC., and Healthy Home Insulation, LLC

No. 132P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

George B. Currin, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Wardson Construction, Inc.

L. Lamar Armstrong, Jr., Attorney at Law, Smithfield, for Denney, Eric, et al.

L. Lamar Armstrong III, Attorney at Law, for Denney, Eric, et al.

Matthew D. Quinn, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Wardson Construction, Inc.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 12th of April 2019 by Defendant (Wardson Construction, Inc.) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Davis, J. recused
18 December 2009 **************************

NSN: 8940-01-572-7478 * MONOGRAPH NO: 1D6 

 **************************

 (SPC) 

Item: Sweet Potato Casserole

Document: PCR-S-022 Sweet Potato Casserole, Packaged in a Polymeric Tray, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 180 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

General: Cooked sweet potato dices and coconut shreds in a thick, sweet potato sauce.

Sweet potatoes: Cooked orange sweet potato dices.

Coconut: Shredded with an off white to tan color.

Sauce: Smooth, thick with coconut shreds, orange to brown color.

Odor: Cooked sweet potatoes and may have brown sugar, coconut and cinnamon.

Flavor: Cooked sweet potatoes and may have brown sugar, coconut and cinnamon.

Texture:

Sweet potatoes: Soft, starchy and not pasty.

Coconut: Slightly tender.

Sauce: Smooth and moderately thick with coconut.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkened, thick sweet potatoes, thickened sauce.

Odor: Scorched, rancid, reduced spice/coconut flavor.

Flavor: Scorched, reduced spice/coconut flavor.

Texture: Pasty, dry, oiling off of sauce.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

: 

Special Notes

NA

:
No. 09-5901.

#### William Henry Harrison, Petitioner v. Cameron Lindsay, Warden.

559 U.S. 1093, 130 S. Ct. 2370,

176 L. Ed. 2d 769,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3548.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.