alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      31.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Peter
      M. Kuhn, Chief Executive Officer of Bullion River Gold Corp. (the "small
      business issuer"), certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement
      of
      a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were
      made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly
      Report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects
      the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;





4.
      I am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and
      I
      have:





a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;





b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c)
      presented in this Quarterly Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the
      disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation
      Date;





5.
      I have
      disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors
      and
      the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
      the equivalent function);





a)
      all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
      could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
      and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's auditors
      any
      material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls.





Dated: 
                May 15, 2007
            
            Signature:
            /s/Peter
                M. KuhnPeter
                M. Kuhn
              Chief
                Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                      Exhibit 23.1



                       ENGINEER'S CONSENT


We  consent  to  incorporation by reference in  the  Registration
Statements (No. 33-32378, No. 33-67924 and No. 333-66873) on Form
S-8  and the Registration Statements (No. 333-00815 and No.  333-
66899)  on Form S-3 of Devon Energy Corporation the reference  to
our  appraisal report for Devon Energy Corporation as of December
31, 1998, which appears in the December 31, 1998 annual report on
Form 10-K of Devon Energy Corporation.





                              By: William E. LaRoche
                              LAROCHE PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, LTD.


March 29, 1999
No. 09-9631.

#### Mark Marvin, Petitioner v. Supervisor of the Orange County Support Collection, et al.

560 U.S. 910, 130 S. Ct. 3289,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1194,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3899.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T KU R T WAS HING T ON , P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. J A M ES A Y A TES, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 09- 16541 D . C . N o . 1 : 0 8 -cv -0 0 4 3 1 -L JO ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia L aw r e nc e J . O ’ N e i l l , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d M ay24, 2011 ** B e f o r e : P R E G E R S O N , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . C al i forni a s t at e pri soner K urtW as hi ng t on appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on c ha l l e ngi ng the l o ss o f w o rk -t i m e cred i t s fo l l o w i n g a p ri so n d i sci p l i n ary p ro ceed i n g . W e d i sm i ss. 

# FI LED JU N 09 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 16541 2 W as hi ng t on cont ends thatthe 30 -dayl oss of w ork-t i m e c re di t s a ss es se d f o llo w in g h is p r is o n d is c ip lin aryc o n v ic tio n v io la te dh is c o n s titu tio n a l r ig h ts . A f t e rbr i e f i ng w a s c om pl e t e d i n thi s c a s e , thi s c ourthe l d tha tac e rt i f i c a t e of ap p e a lab ilityis r e q u ir e dto c h a lle n g e a n a d m in is tr a tiv e d e c is io n . See H ayw ard v. M a rs h a ll , 603 F . 3d 546, 554- 55 ( 9th C i r . 2010) ( e n banc ) . B e c aus e W a s hi ngt on h a s n o th a s m a d e as ub s t an t i a l s h o wi n g o f th e d e n i a l o f

ac o n s t i tu t i o n a l r i g h t , we d e c lin e to c e rtif

yh is c la im s . See 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 3 ( c ) . A ll p e n d in g m o tio n s a r e d e n ie da s m o o t. D I S M I S S E D .
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

In connection withthe Annual Report of American Power Conversion Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rodger B. Dowdell, Jr.,Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

| /s/ RODGER  B. DOWDELL JR.                   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Rodger B. Dowdell Jr.                        |
| *Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

March 15, 2006

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and isnot being filed as part of a separate disclosure document.

----
EXHIBIT 10.2


 




REDEMPTION NOTICE


Series 3 Class B Common Stock (Par Value $0.00001)


 











 




CARDIOGENICS HOLDINGS INC.


6295 Northam Drive, Unit 8 • Mississauga Ontario L4V 1W8


T: 905.673.8501 • F: 905.673.9865


redemption @cardiogenics.com







February 25, 2011


 








    



	
To:

	
The Holders of CardioGenics Holdings Inc. Series 3 Class B Common Stock (“Series 3 CL B Shares”)












This will serve as notice that CardioGenics Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) hereby redeems all issued and outstanding Series 3 Class B Shares of the Company as follows:








	
REDEMPTION PRICE:

	  	
$0.00001


	  	  	  
	
REDEMPTION DATE:

	  	
April 4, 2011


	  	  	  
	
SURRENDER INSTRUCTIONS:

	  	
Holders of the Series 3 CL B Shares shall surrender certificates representing their Series 3 CL B Shares to the Company at the following address:


 


CardioGenics Holdings Inc.


6295 Northam Drive, Unit 8


Mississauga, Ontario L4V 1W8 Canada


Attention: Series 3 CL B Redemption


	  	  	  
	
DIVIDENDS:

	  	
Dividends on Series 3 CL B Shares shall cease to accumulate on the day prior to the Redemption Date unless the Corporation defaults in the payment of the Redemption Price. To date, no dividends have been declared with respect to the Series 3 CL B Shares.


	  	  	  
	
TRUST ACCOUNT:

	  	
In accordance with the Certificate of Designation for the Series 3 Class B Shares, the Company has elected to establish a trust account with TORONTO DOMINION BANK, in which it will deposit, prior to the Redemption Date, all funds necessary for the redemption of the Series 3 CL B Shares, which funds shall be held in trust for the pro-rata benefit of the holders of the Series 3 CL B shares redeemed under this notice.


	  	  	  
	
TERMINATION OF RIGHTS:


 

	
  

	
Notwithstanding that any certificate for Series 3 CL B Shares called for redemption hereunder shall not have been surrendered for cancellation, all Series 3 CL B Shares so called for redemption shall no longer be deemed outstanding, and all rights with respect to such Series 3 CL B Shares shall forthwith on the Redemption Date cease and terminate, except only the right of the holders thereof to receive the pro-rata amount payable on redemption of the Series 3 CL B Shares, without interest.







 




CARDIOGENICS HOLDINGS INC.


 





	
By:

	  	  
	  	
Yahia Gawad, Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report (as defined under the preceding Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, Christian Baha,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Quadriga Asset Management, Inc., the
general partner of (the Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Fund.


                                     By:  /s/ Christian Baha
                                     ------------------------------------
                                     Christian Baha
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer
                                     August 14, 2003



                                      E-4
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 13, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-0791 Lower Tribunal No. F16-9143

________________ 

### Johanna Garcia, Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Daryl E. Trawick, Judge. Johanna Garcia, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before EMAS, LINDSEY, and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Napier Sandford FULLER

No. 378P18-5

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 9, 2019

Peter A. Regulski, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Blake M. Courlang, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Matthew W. Sawchak, Solicitor General, For State of North Carolina.

James R. Woodall, Jr., District Attorney, For the State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th of September 2019 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of September 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 6th of September 2019 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was *591entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3 

# United Stat es Court of Appeals

For the First C ircuit

Nos. 04-1212 04-1605 BRIAN J. DASEY, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.
APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Rya W. Zobel, U.S. District Judge ]

Before Boudin, Chief Judge , Torruella and Lynch, Circuit Judges .
Brian J. Dasey on brief pro se. Thomas Reilly , Attorney General, and Matthew Q. Berge , Assistant Attorney General, on Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Disposition for appellees.

October 28, 2004-2- Per Curiam . In No. 04-1212, appellant Brian Dasey appeals from the district court's denial of his motions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), for reconsideration, and for sa nctions. In No. 04-1605, he appeals from the denial of a second motion for reconsideration and a motion for leave to supplement his filings.

After careful review of the record and the parties' arguments, we affirm the judgments below, concluding that the di strict court did not abuse its discretion in denying Dasey's motions. We agree substantially with the reason ing in the district court's Memorandum of Decision dated January 29, 2004, andits March 2, 2004 endorsed order denying reconsideration. In addition, as appellees contend, Dasey may not use a Rule 60(b) motion to relitigate issues already decided by this court, Dasey
v. An derson , 3 04 F.3d 148, 151 (1st Cir. 2002), or to raise issues that might have been, but were not, asserted in prior court proceedings. 12 Moore's Fed. Prac. § 60.48[3][c], at 60- 174.1 (3d ed. 2003) (confirming that a party's "[f]ailure to take advantage of an opportunity to litigate an issue precludes use of that i ssue to secure" Rule 60(b)(6) relief). Finally, Dasey's motions failed to establish the alleged "fraud on the court."

The judgments in the above appeals are affirmed. 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27(c).
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Tiens Biotech Group (USA),
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange   Commission  (the  "Report"),   the
undersigned,  Jinyuan Li, Chief  Executive  Officer and Chairman of the Board of
the Company, and Wenjun Jiao, Chief Financial Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted by Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:

         1.  The  Report  fully  complies  in all  material  respects  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of China
Finance, Inc. as of and for the period covered by the Report.

         Pursuant to the rules and  regulations  of the  Securities and Exchange
Commission, this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.


         Date:  November 14, 2005       By: /s/ Jinyuan Li
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Jinyuan Li
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)

         Date:  November 14, 2005

                                        By: /s/ Wenjun Jiao
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Wenjun Jiao
                                           Chief Financial Officer
October 17, 2012 

Mr. Dennis Darrah 

1201 Columbia Road, Suite 101 

Plainfield, IN 46168 

Dear Mr. Darrah: 

This letter is in response to your August 7, 2012, petition for rulemaking to amend § 65.93 of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) that would combine eligibility requirements 

to be used for inspection authorization (IA) renewals. 

In general, we use the following criteria to determine which petitions for rulemaking are of 

sufficient priority to initiate a rulemaking action: 

1) the immediacy of the safety concerns the petition raises; 

2) the priority of other Federal Aviation Administration rulemaking issues; and 

3) the resources we have available to address these issues. 

The FAA issued denials of petitions for exemption and rulemaking in circumstances similar 

in all material respects to those presented in your petition for rulemaking. 

The FAA has given careful consideration to your petition; however, we disagree with the 

proposed revision. Section 65.93, by rule, currently affords sufficient flexibility for IA 

renewals based on several different activity levels, training and or oral testing without the 

necessity of combining annuals, major repairs and or major alteration as proposed in your 

petition. Further and most importantly, there is no gained safety benefit in allowing 

combinations of the activities within § 65.93(a)(1), (2) or (3) as proposed to be considered for 

IA renewal purposes. The FAA’s limited resources can be better served when directed to 

specific areas of safety concerns and IA renewals do not rise to this level of safety concern. 

Therefore we find that your petition does not address an immediate safety concern to warrant 

further resources at this time. 
2 

In consideration of the foregoing and pursuant to the authority contained in 

49 U.S.C. §§ 40113 and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, your petition for 

rulemaking is hereby denied. 

Accordingly, we will close Docket No. FAA-2012-0840. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John S. Duncan 

Deputy Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS
EASTLAND , TEXAS
JUDGMENT

Gabriel Mendoza

, * From the 161st District Court of Ector County, Trial Court No. B

- 19

- 0006

- CR

.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 9

- 00 210

- CR * April 2 , 20 20

The State of Texas

, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J., Stretcher , J. , and Wright, S.C.J., sitting by assignment ) ( Willson , J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion, w e modify the judgment of the trial court to change the T ime P ayment

F ee from $25.00 to $2.50 and affirm the judgment as modified

.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 05, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 05, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19I0250. NASIR ANDREWS v. MARIA ALEXANDER. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: STSV2018000989
> Exhibit 12.2
> 
> 
> PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
> 
> PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Chartered
>  Accountants1250 René-Lévesque Boulevard WestSuite 2800Montreal, QuebecCanada H3B
>  2G4Telephone +1 (514) 205 5000Facsimile +1 (514) 876 1502CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
> We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference
>  in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-102792) of Mamma.com Inc. (formerly Intasys Corporation)
>  of our Auditors' Report dated February 24, 2004 (except for Note 26 which is as at April 15, 2004) and
>  our Comments by Auditors for U.S. Readers on Canada-U.S. Reporting Difference dated February 24, 2004,
>  (except for Note 26 which is as at April 15, 2004) relating to the consolidated financial statements
>  of Mamma.com Inc. (formerly Intasys Corporation) which appear in this Annual Report to shareholders
>  on Form 20-F. s/s PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Chartered Accountants Montreal,
>  Quebec, Canada May 18, 2004
> PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the Canadian firm
>  of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and other members of the worldwide PricewaterhouseCoopers organization.
> 
> Sequential Page No: 350 of 350Exhibits: Page
>  123
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 06334

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 06334\06334_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

06334\06334_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

06334\06334_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 06334\06334_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06334\06334_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06334\06334_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06334\06334_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06334\06334_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

06334\Certification Statement_06334.pdf Plant certification statement

x 06334\Supporting Documentation\06334_LOS EPA Inquiry Summer 2010.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06334\Supporting Documentation\06334_POND-1.doc Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06334\Supporting Documentation\06334_POND-1.docx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06334\Supporting Documentation\06334_Water Diagram Material Balance.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06334\Supporting Documentation\06334_Water Diagram Material Balance.xlsx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.