alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended May 31, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,753,004
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,648
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    953,045
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,848,760
<PP&E>                                         591,248
<DEPRECIATION>                               (283,044)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,175,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          867,429
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,782
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,974,180
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,175,021
<SALES>                                      2,096,562
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,096,562
<CGS>                                        1,020,047
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,020,047
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,359,408
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               225,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,511
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,516,404)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,516,404)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,516,404)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>
1 The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-2834

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the George Piper, * Eastern District of Missouri. * Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________ Submitted: July 17, 2000 Filed: July 21, 2000

___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. George Piper challenges the sentence imposed by the district court 1 after he pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) and 846. His counsel has filed a brief and moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Although we granted Piper permission to file a pro se supplemental brief, he has not done so.-2-

As part of his plea agreement, Piper waived his right to appeal his sentence unless the district court departed upward from the Guidelines range. We conclude that this waiver was knowing and voluntary. Among other things, Piper was assisted by counsel at the change-of-plea and sentencing hearings; the court questioned him about the appeal waiver at the change-of-plea hearing, verifying that he understood he was waiving his right to appeal as part of the plea bargain, and then reminded him of the appeal waiver at sentencing; and the plea agreement and the presentence report advised him of the mandatory minimum penalty. See UnitedStates v. Michelsen , 141 F.3d 867, 8 71 (8th Cir.) (appeal waiver is enforceable so long as it resulted from knowing and voluntary decision), cert. denied , 525 U.S. 942 (1998); UnitedStates v. Greger , 98 F.3d 1080, 1081-82 (8th Cir. 1996) (so long as sentence is not in conflict with negotiated plea agreement, knowing and voluntary waiver of right to appeal from sentence will be enforced; waiver was knowing and intelligent where it was included in plea agreement, it was discussed at change-of-plea hearing, and court reviewed waiver of right to appeal at sentencing). Accordingly, because Piper’s sentence was not an upward departure from the Guidelines range, we now specifically enforce his promise not to appeal by dismissing his appeal. See UnitedStates v. Estrada-Bahena , 201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam). We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

Spears v. McCotter , 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-11228 Conference Calendar

__________________
MARION HOUSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus K. RATNARAJAH, Dr., TDCJ Clements Unit; RICHARDSON, Nurse, TDCJ Clements Unit, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:95-CV-179

- - - - - - - - - - April 16, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Marion Houston appeals the dismissal of his civil rights complaint concerning his medical care as frivolous. He argues that his allegations rise to the level of a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim and that the physician testifying at the Spears ** hearing went beyond his role of explaining Houston's medical records and the significance of the entries. We have carefully reviewed theNo. 95-11228 -2-

Houston does not argue on appeal that his work assignment was improper as he did in the district court. That issue is abandoned. See Eason v. Thaler , 14 F.3d 8, 9 n.1 (5th Cir. 1994). record and Houston's arguments. *** Any improper testimony of the physician had no effect on the district court's dismissal. For essentially the same reasons as explained in the magistrate judge's report, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Houston's complaint as frivolous.
AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Barbara Jean MYERS-MCNEIL

No. 453P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Michelle F. Lynch, GAL Appellate Counsel, For Myers-McNeil, Barbara Jean

Christine Wright, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina

Heidi E. Reiner, Assistant Appellate Defender, For Myers-McNeil, Barbara Jean

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of April 2019 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 17th of April 2019 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of April 2019 by Defendant to File an Amended Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the amended petition filed on the 17th of April 2019 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition in the alternative filed by Defendant on the 17th of April 2019 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*92"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth Hicks, of Argentex Mining Corporation,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Argentex Mining
Corporation for the interim period ended October 31, 2010 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Argentex Mining Corporation.

Dated: December 14, 2010



/s/ Kenneth
HicksKenneth Hicks President and Director (Principal Executive
Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Argentex Mining
Corporation and will be retained by Argentex Mining Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The ACRS Subcommittee on Reliability and Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) will hold a meeting on March 27, 2009, Room T-2-B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. 

The entire meeting will be open to public attendance. 

The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

Friday, March 27, 2009—1 p.m. until the conclusion of business.

                    The Subcommittee will review example uses of the guidance on performance of sensitivity and uncertainty analyses described in NUREG-1855. The Subcommittee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of the NRC staff. The Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee. Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Harold VanderMolen (                    *Telephone:*                     301-415-6236) 5 days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are open to the public. Detailed procedures for the conduct of and participation in ACRS meetings were published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 6, 2008, (73FR 58268-58269).                 

Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting the Designated Federal Official between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda. 

Dated: March 6, 2009. 

Cayetano Santos, 

Chief, Reactor Safety Branch A, Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards.

[FR Doc. E9-5450 Filed 3-12-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
JONES v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, et al.

430P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Cedric R. Perry, Attorney at Law, Rocky Mount, for Jones, Debra.

H. George Kurani, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Veronica Fleury, Attorney at Law, Asheville, for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of December 2018 by Defendant for Sanctions:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9465-9466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4607]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Data Collection Available for Public Comments and Recommendations

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice announces the Small Business

[[Page 9466]]

Administration's intentions to request approval on a new and/or 
currently approved information collection.

DATES: Submit comments on or before May 4, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Send all comments regarding whether this information 
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the function of 
the agency, whether the burden estimates are accurate, and if there are 
ways to minimize the estimated burden and enhance the quality of the 
collection, to Sandra Johnston, Program Analyst, Office of Financial 
Assistance, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, 8th Floor, 
Washington, DC 20416.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Johnston, Program Analyst, 
Office of Financial Assistance, 202-205-7528, [email protected] 
Curtis B. Rich, Management Analyst, 202-205-7030, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SBA collects this information from lenders 
who participate in the secondary market program. The information is 
used to facilitate and administer secondary market transactions in 
accordance with 15 U.S.C. 634(f)(3) and to monitor the program for 
compliance with 15 U.S.C.
    Title: ``Secondary Participation Guaranty Agreement''.
    Description of Respondents: SBA Participating Lenders.
    Form Number's: 1086, 1502.
    Annual Responses: 530.
    Annual Burden: 42,000.

Jacqueline White,
Chief, Administrative Information Branch.
[FR Doc. E9-4607 Filed 3-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, April 2, 2009, 3:30 p.m. to April 2, 2009, 4:30 p.m., National Institutes of Health,  Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD  20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on March 4, 2009, 74 FR 9410.                 

The meeting will be held on April 6, 2009. The meeting is closed to the public. 

Dated: March 9, 2009. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

 [FR Doc. E9-5495 Filed 3-12-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 16

- 00314

- CV

Chantella Marie Rosales

v. Robert Jacob Morales

On a ppeal from the 148th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2012

- FAM

- 5741

- E

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having conside red this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance. S eptember 2, 2016
#### Sarasota Business Properties, Inc., a Corporation, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Sarasota Bay Hotel Company, a Corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

En Banc.

Decision Filed March 8, 1928.

*Sawyer, Surrency, Carter & Keen,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Burket & Fish*and *Mabry, Reaves & Carlton,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, Terrell, Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Buford, J. J., dissent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          23,008
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  165,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,493)
<INVENTORY>                                    139,720
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               341,038
<PP&E>                                         255,381
<DEPRECIATION>                               (115,803)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,043,888
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          151,973
<BONDS>                                      1,059,419
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           25,649
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   (208,145)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,043,888
<SALES>                                        943,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               943,607
<CGS>                                          601,385
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  250,526
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               114,246
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             109,705
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,550)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,162
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (30,712)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    179
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (31,586)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 536 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 536

To eliminate the unfair and disadvantageous treatment of cash military 
   compensation other than basic pay under the supplemental security 
                        income benefits program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2005

   Mrs. Davis of California introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To eliminate the unfair and disadvantageous treatment of cash military 
   compensation other than basic pay under the supplemental security 
                        income benefits program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Families Financial Security 
Act''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF UNIFORMED SERVICE COMPENSATION.

    (a) Treatment of Uniformed Service Cash Remuneration as Earned 
Income.--
            (1) In general.--Section 1612(a)(1)(A) of the Social 
        Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1382a(a)(1)(A)) is amended by inserting 
        ``(and, in the case of cash remuneration paid for service as a 
        member of a uniformed service (other than payments described in 
        paragraph (2)(H)), without regard to the limitations contained 
        in section 209(d))'' before the semicolon.
            (2) Certain housing payments treated as in-kind support and 
        maintenance.--Section 1612(a)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
        1382a(a)(2)) is amended--
                    (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph 
                (F);
                    (B) by striking the period at the end of 
                subparagraph (G) and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(H) payments to or on behalf of a member of a 
                uniformed service for housing of the member (and his or 
                her dependents, if any) on a facility of a uniformed 
                service, including payments provided under section 403 
                of title 37, United States Code, for housing that is 
                acquired or constructed under subchapter IV of chapter 
                169 of title 10 of such Code, or any related provision 
                of law, and any such payments shall be treated as 
                support and maintenance in kind subject to subparagraph 
                (A) of this paragraph.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall be 
effective with respect to benefits payable for months beginning at 
least 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```