alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Submitted March 10, 2005 Decided March 28, 2005 Before Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

No. 05-1606 RAMON F. CASTELLANOS, Applicant ,
v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

. On M otion for an Order Authorizing the District Court to Entertain a S econd or Successive Motion for Collateral Review

O R D E R Ramon Castellanos has filed his third application pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3) for an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See No. 04-3394 (7th Cir. Sept. 20, 2004) (dismissing application because proposed claim under Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), was premature); No. 00-3241 (7th Cir. Sept. 29, 2000) (denying in part and dismissing in part application proposing a claim under Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000)). Castellanos now renews his proposed Blakely claim and adds a citation to United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). Booker does not make the Blakely

rule retroactive, and in fact does not announce whether its new rule applying Blakely

to the sentencing guidelines is itself applicable to cases on collateral review under § 2255 ¶8(2). The proposed claim is premature. Simpson v. United States , 376 F.3d 679 (7th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we DISMISS without prejudice Castellanos’ application for leave to commence a successive collateral attack. He may renew the application ifNo. 00-3095 Page 2

the Supreme Court makes the Booker rule retroactive.
In the MATTER OF: E.M.

No. COA18-1223

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 16, 2019

AFFIRMED.
No. 09-6203.

#### Lynne Meredith, Petitioner v. Andrew Erath, et al.

559 U.S. 964, 130 S. Ct. 1572,

176 L. Ed. 2d 155,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1087.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 997, 130 S. Ct. 537, 175 L. Ed. 2d 357, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 7846.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JEFFREY ANDERSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 211 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Matthew Joseph SCHMIEDER

No. 264P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

James R. Parish, Attorney at Law, Fayetteville, for Schmieder, Matthew Joseph.

Neil C. Dalton, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Greg Newman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th of July 2019 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of July 2019 by Defendant to Deem Petition for Discretionary Review Timely Filed:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of July 2019 by Defendant in the Alternative to Treat the Petition for Discretionary Review as a Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
No. 09-9542.

#### Robert Joseph King, Petitioner v. John Colmers, et al.

559 U.S. 1098, 130 S. Ct. 2385,

176 L. Ed. 2d 778,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3498.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Full Circle Promotions, Inc. a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Neilan Vancas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Full Circle Promotions, Inc., and will be retained by Full Circle
Promotions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


/s/ Neilan Vancas
--------------------------
Neilan Vancas
Chief Financial Officer
May 19, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,158,462
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  540,456
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,170,509
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,161,394
<PP&E>                                         205,443
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,034,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          166,618
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,006,825
<OTHER-SE>                                   (155,885)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,034,443
<SALES>                                      3,721,528
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,721,528
<CGS>                                        2,064,586
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,854,752
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (162,462)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (37,489)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (124,973)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (124,973)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                                  GENUS, INC.
                  COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME/LOSS PER SHARE(a)
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                       YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                                   -------------------------------
<S>                                                                                <C>        <C>        <C>
                                                                                     1996       1995       1994
                                                                                   ---------  ---------  ---------
Weighted average common shares outstanding.......................................     16,423     15,334     12,545
Weighted average common equivalent shares outstanding............................     --            729        561
                                                                                   ---------  ---------  ---------
  Total shares used in computation...............................................     16,423     16,063     13,106
                                                                                   ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                                                   ---------  ---------  ---------
 
Net income (loss)................................................................  $  (9,205) $  19,282  $   4,177
Earnings (loss) per share(b).....................................................  $   (0.56) $    1.20  $    0.32
</TABLE>
 
------------------------
 
(a) See Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
(b) Primary and fully diluted earnings per share are materially the same for all
    years presented.
1 

### Sutton, Lisa

From: Maietta, Anthony

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 4:33 PM

To: Brachtl, Megan; Sutton, Lisa

Cc: Portanova, Mary; Blakley, Pamela

Subject: FW: Wisconsin: Final SIP Call: Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction

That should be all the R5 states.

Have a good weekend!

‐ Tony

Anthony Maietta

EPA Region 5

maietta.anthony@epa.gov

(312) 353

‐ 8777

From: Czerniak, George

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 3:31 PM

To: Portanova, Mary; Maietta, Anthony

Subject: FW: Wisconsin: Final SIP Call: Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction

From: Czerniak, George

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:48 PM

To: 'Sponseller, Bart A

‐ DNR'

Subject: Wisconsin: Final SIP Call: Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction

Bart

This message is to notify you about the final action the EPA Administrator signed today to ensure States have in place

air pollution rules that apply to sources at all times, including when the source is operating during periods of startup,

shutdown, or malfunction (SSM).

This action responds to a Petition for Rulemaking filed by the Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians concerning the

treatment of excess emissions at industrial facilities during SSM operations, specifically how those emissions are

treated in State Implementation Plan (SIP) provisions that the EPA previously approved. Also, as part of this action,

EPA has revised and clarified its policy concerning SSM provisions consistent with the Clean Air Act.

The EPA is calling for 36 States to make changes to their SIPs, to protect public health and ensure consistency with the

Clean Air Act and the EPA’s current SSM Policy. These States will have 18 months to submit revisions of their State plan

to EPA. The revised SIPs are due to EPA by November 22, 2016. Wisconsin is NOT currently included in this final SIP Call.

To inform you of the details on the final action, including EPA’s policy clarifications concerning SSM provisions, we

have posted a pre

‐ publication version of the action on our website

at: http://www.epa.gov/airquality/ur banair/sipstatus/emissions.html

.

If you or your staff have questions, please contact Mary Portanova, portanova.mary@epa.gov

, (312) 353

‐ 5954.2 George
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

 ________________________ 

 No. 16-13528-J, 16-13804-J, & 

 16-13857-J 

 ________________________ 

IN RE: LARRY LEONARD, 

Petitioner. 

 __________________________ 

 Application for Leave to File a Second or Successive 

Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, 

or Correct Sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h) 

_________________________ 

Before: MARCUS, MARTIN, and JORDAN, Circuit Judges 

B Y T H E P A N E L: 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255(h) and 2244(b)(3)(A), Larry Leonard has filed an 

application seeking an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive 

motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Such authorization 

may be granted only if this Court certifies that the second or successive motion contains a claim 

involving: 

(1) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the 

evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing 

evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the 

offense; or 

(2) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral 

review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable. 

28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). “The court of appeals may authorize the filing of a second or successive 

application only if it determines that the application makes a prima facie showing that the 

Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 1 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 2 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 3 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 4 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 5 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 6 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 7 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 8 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 9 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 10 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 11 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 12 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 13 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 14 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 15 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 16 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 17 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 18 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 19 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 20 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 21 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 22 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 23 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 24 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 25 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 26 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 27 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 28 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 29 of 30 
Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 30 of 30
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd.  (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission of the Partnership's  Annual Report
on Form  10-K for the  period  ending  December  31,  2003 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



Date:   March 23, 2004




                                            /s/ Robert A. Bourne
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Name:  Robert A. Bourne
                                            Title:     President and Treasurer

                                            A signed  original  of this  written
                                            statement  required  by Section  906
                                            has been provided to CNL Income Fund
                                            VI, Ltd. and will be retained by CNL
                                            Income Fund VI, Ltd.  and  furnished
                                            to  the   Securities   and  Exchange
                                            Commission   or   its   staff   upon
                                            request.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on
Form 10-Q of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp. (the
Company) for the period ended June 30, 2004
(the Report) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Nikolas
Antonopoulos, Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| |    |                                                                                                                                                              
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | this Report fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|
| | 2. | the information contained in this Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  July 30, 2004

| |     |                         
| | --- | ------------------------
| | By: | /s/ Nikolas Antonopoulos

| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| |                                      
| | Nikolas Antonopoulos                 
| | Chief Executive Officer and President

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Case No. DA 20-0353

EDWARD ZABROCKI,

Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

THE TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT 

SYSTEM OF THE STATE OF 

MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee.

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME

Upon consideration of Petitioner/Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to M. R. App. P. 26(1), 

Petitioner/Appellant is granted an extension of time in which to file his opening 

brief. The Petitioner/Appellant shall file his opening brief on or before October 16, 

2020.

Dated this __ day of September, 2020.

______________________________

cc: Denise Pizzini

Scott M. Svee

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

September 9 2020

09/09/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0353
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5108 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 5108

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 28, 2006

                                Received

                           November 13, 2006

   Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 
                          Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 1213 East Houston Street in Cleveland, Texas, as the ``Lance 
          Corporal Robert A. Martinez Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL ROBERT A. MARTINEZ POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1213 East Houston Street in Cleveland, Texas, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Lance Corporal Robert A. Martinez Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lance 
Corporal Robert A. Martinez Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT
      31.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Nancy
      Huber, Chief Financial Officer of Bullion River Gold Corp. (the "small business
      issuer"), certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement
      of
      a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were
      made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly
      Report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects
      the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;





4.
      I am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and
      I
      have:





a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;





b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c)
      presented in this Quarterly Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the
      disclosure controls and procedures based on My evaluation as of the Evaluation
      Date;





5.
      I have
      disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors
      and
      the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
      the equivalent function);





a)
      all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
      could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
      and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's auditors
      any
      material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls.





Dated:
                August 14, 2006
            
            Signature:
            /s/
                Nancy Huber
              Nancy
                HuberChief Financial
                Officer