alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                Date of Report: (Date of earliest event reported)

                                  May 15, 2001



                          GOVERNMENT TRUSTS 1-C AND 1-D
             ------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



                                    Illinois
                 ----------------------------------------------
                 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)


                33-23681                        36-6889612      36-3889613
         -------------------------            ------------------------------
         (Commission File Number)               (IRS Employer I.D. No.)


         Bank One Trust Company, NA (formerly The First National Bank of
                                Chicago), Trustee
              9/th/ Floor, Suite IL1-0126, Chicago, Illinois 60670
              ----------------------------------------------------
               (Address of principal executive offices (Zip Code)



       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (312) 407-2797




<PAGE>

Item 5.           Other Events

Attached hereto as Exhibit A are copies of the reports to holders of Government
Trust Certificates Class 1-C & 1-D, dated May 15, 2001.

<PAGE>

                                    SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Bank
One Trust Company, NA (formerly The First National Bank of Chicago) has duly
caused this report to be signed for the registrant Trust by a duly authorized
signatory of the Trustee.

                                        GOVERNMENT TRUST CERTIFICATES


                                             By: Bank One Trust Company, NA
                                                 --------------------------
                                                 (formerly The First National
                                                 Bank of Chicago)
                                                 Not in its individual capacity
                                                 but solely as Trustee on behalf
                                                 of the Trusts 1-C & 1-D.


                                        By:      /s/ Joan E. Blume
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                     Joan E. Blume
                                                     Trust Officer

Date: as of May 15, 2001
CERTIFICATION
      OF OFFICERS


OF
      ARTFEST INTERNATIONAL, INC.


PURSUANT
      TO 18 USC & 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE


SARBANES
      - OXLEY


ACT
      OF
      2002




I
      hereby
      certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-QSB,


and
      filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission


on
      the
      date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange


Act
      of
      1934 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of that
      section.





I
      further
      certify that the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents,


in
      all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of


the
      company.




s/s
      Joseph Walsh


Joseph
      Walsh, President


(Chief
      Executive Officer)




s/s
      Joseph Walsh


Joseph
      Walsh, Treasurer


(Chief
      Financial Officer)





December
      29, 2005
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5308 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow residents of border 

States a deduction for passport application fees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 4, 2006 

Mr. POE (for himself, Mr. BASS, Miss MCMORRIS, and Ms. KILPATRICK of 

Michigan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow residents of border States a deduction for passport application fees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Passport Deduction 

5 for Border States Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR PASSPORT APPLICATION FEES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part VII of subchapter B of chap8 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 

9 additional itemized deductions for individuals) is amended 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5308 IH

1 by redesignating section 224 as section 225 and by insert2 ing after section 223 the following new section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 224. PASSPORT APPLICATION FEES. 

4 ‘‘(a) DEDUCTION ALLOWED.—In the case of an indi5 vidual who resides in a border State, there shall be allowed 

6 as a deduction for the taxable year an amount equal to 

7 the qualified passport application fees paid or incurred by 

8 the individual during the taxable year. 

9 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section— 

10 ‘‘(1) QUALIFIED PASSPORT APPLICATION

11 FEES.—With respect to an individual, the term 

12 ‘qualified passport application fees’ means the fees 

13 required pursuant to section 1 of the Passport Act 

14 of June 4, 1920 (22 U.S.C. 214), for the application 

15 for a United States passport for— 

16 ‘‘(A) the individual, 

17 ‘‘(B) the individual’s spouse, or 

18 ‘‘(C) any dependent of the individual with 

19 respect to whom the individual is allowed a de20 duction under section 151. 

21 ‘‘(2) BORDER STATE.—The term ‘border State’ 

22 means any State that has a boundary in common 

23 with Canada or Mexico.’’. 

24 (b) DEDUCTION ALLOWED WHETHER OR NOT INDI25 VIDUAL ITEMIZES OTHER DEDUCTIONS.—Subsection (a) 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5308 IH

1 of section 62 of such Code is amended by inserting before 

2 the last sentence at the end the following new paragraph: 

3 ‘‘(21) PASSPORT APPLICATION FEES.—The de4 duction allowed by section 224.’’. 

5 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

6 for part VII of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code 

7 is amended by redesignating the item relating to section 

8 224 as an item relating to section 225 and by inserting 

9 before such item the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 224. Passport application fees.’’. 

10 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

12 December 31, 2005. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Browserweb Media Agency, Mark Burke v. Maxus Energy

Corporation

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 01028

- CV

Trial court case number: 2014

- 63727

Trial court: 11th Distr ict Court of Harris County

Appellee Maxus Energy Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss filed April 14, 2015 is

DENIED

.

Appellant filed a response to the Motion to Dismiss on April 15, 2015 in which he

requests an additional 30 days to file his brief. The mot ion is GRANTED, with no further

extensions

. Appellant’s brief is due May 8 , 2015.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Ac ting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 1 6 , 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,391,134
<CGS>                                       13,168,214
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,606,180<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               105,116
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (973,918)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (252,062)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   469,684
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (721,746)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (721,746)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.60)
<FN>
<F1>SG&A
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.1 Section
      906 Certification




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with this Quarterly Report of Optigenex Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q/Amendment Number 1 for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel
      Zwiren, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Daniel
                ZwirenDaniel
                ZwirenChief
                Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDate:
                October 14, 2008
Exhibit 32.1
Tiens Biotech Group (USA), Inc.


  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection  with the annual  report of Tiens  Biotech Group (USA),  Inc. (the
Company)  on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),  each of the
undersigned officers of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best
of their knowledge:

     1)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/ LI Jinyuan
-------------------------------------
LI Jinyuan
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2004

/s/ JIAO Wenjun
-------------------------------------
JIAO Wenjun
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2004

A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION  906, HAS BEEN  PROVIDED TO ??? BAKER & MCKENZIE  ACCEPTANCE
CORPORATION  AND WILL BE FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE  COMMISSION OR
ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
Solectron Corporation:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-69443, 333-46304, 333-46300, 333-40176, 333-34494, 333-92269,
333-75865, 333-85949, 333-89035, 333-75813, 333-24293, 333-02523, 333-17643,
333-56220, 333-56464, 333-60684, 333-64454, 333-69182, 333-73238, 333-74946,
333-84066, 333-96823, 033-58580, 333-46686, 033-57575, 033-75270, 033-33461,
033-58210, 333-83297, 333-02945, 333-15983, 333-49206, 333-102534, 333-102535,
and 333-107127) on Forms S-3, S-4 and S-8 of Solectron Corporation of our report
dated November 10, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Solectron Corporation and subsidiaries as of August 31, 2003 and 2002, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity,
comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended August 31, 2003, and the related financial statement
schedule, which report appears in the August 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K
of Solectron Corporation.

Our report dated November 10, 2003 contains an explanatory paragraph stating
that effective as of September 1, 2001, the Company adopted the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets".

/S/ KPMG LLP


Mountain View, California
November 10, 2003
Order entered September 13 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 00594

- CR

JOSE ANGEL JASSO JR. , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Tri al Court Cause No. F09

- 72432

- P



### O RDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.
On August 26, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the
reporter’s record had not been filed. On September 11, 2013, we received the reporter’s record.

Ther efore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the August 26, 2013 order
requiring findings.
Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 11



                     COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                           52-WEEK PERIOD ENDED
                             DECEMBER 30, 1995



                       Class A          Class B   

Earnings available
for Common
Shareholders         $3,341,271       $3,486,747

Weighted average
of shares
outstanding:

  Shares outstanding 19,209,793       25,000,000

  Shares issued
  upon assumed
  exercise of
  stock options       5,164,699                - 

  Shares assumed
  to be repurchased
  under Treasury
  Stock method
  (at fair market
  value of $24.50)  (3,851,423)                - 

  Total number of
  options considered
  as common stock
  equivalents         1,614,721                -

Total weighted
average number
of shares            20,824,514       25,000,000

Earnings per share          $.16              $.14

<PAGE>
                                EXHIBIT 11



                     COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                           52-WEEK PERIOD ENDED
                             DECEMBER 31, 1994



                       Class A          Class B   

Earnings available
for Common
Shareholders        $57,446,133      $57,524,082 

Weighted average
of shares
outstanding:

  Shares outstanding 19,481,364       25,000,000

  Shares issued
  upon assumed
  exercise of
  stock options       5,434,576                - 

  Shares assumed
  to be repurchased
  under Treasury
  Stock method
  (at fair market
  value of $26.50)  (3,508,561)                - 

  Total number of
  options considered
  as common stock
  equivalents         1,926,015                -

Total weighted
average number
of shares            21,407,379       25,000,000

Earnings per share         $2.68             $2.30

                             
<PAGE>
                                EXHIBIT 11



                     COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                           52-WEEK PERIOD ENDED
                              JANUARY 1, 1994



                       Class A          Class B   

Earnings available
for Common
Shareholders        $49,982,912      $51,059,110 

Weighted average
of shares
outstanding:

  Shares outstanding 20,148,623       25,000,000

  Shares issued
  upon assumed
  exercise of
  stock options       4,066,804                - 

  Shares assumed
  to be repurchased
  under Treasury
  Stock method
  (at fair market
  value of $22.50)  (2,410,224)                -

  Total number of
  options considered
  as common stock
  equivalents         1,656,580                - 

Total weighted
average number
of shares            21,805,203       25,000,000

Earnings per share         $2.29             $2.04
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### General Services Administration

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - 48 CFR Part 15
          - [FAC 2005-30; Item IX; Docket FAR-2009-0011; Sequence 1]

# AGENCIES:

Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

# ACTION:

Final rule.

# SUMMARY:

This document makes an amendment to the Federal Acquisition Regulation in order to make an editorial change.

# DATES:

Effective Date: January 15, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

The FAR Secretariat, Room 4041, GS Building, Washington, DC, 20405, (202) 501-4755, for information pertaining to status or publication schedules. Please cite FAC 2005-30, Technical Amendment.

# 

# List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 15

      - Government procurement

Dated: December 24, 2008.

Edward Loeb,

Acting Director, Office of Acquisition Policy.

Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA amend 48 CFR part 15 as set forth below:

# PART 15—CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 15 continues to read as follows:

Authority:40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42 U.S.C. 2473(c).

15.101-2

2. Amend section 15.101-2 by removing from paragraph (b)(1) “15.304(c)(3)(iv)” and adding “15.304(c)(3)(iii)” in its place. 

[FR Doc. E9-546 Filed 1-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-EP-S
# C_2016437EN.01000201.xml

| 25.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 437/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 437/2

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting of 7 July 2016 regarding a draft decision relating to Case AT.40023 — Cross-border access to pay TV

Rapporteur: Malta

(2016/C 437/02)

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment in its draft Article 9(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (1) decision as communicated to the Advisory Committee on 23 June 2016 under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment in its draft Article 9(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (1) decision as communicated to the Advisory Committee on 23 June 2016 under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.

1

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the proceedings against Paramount can be concluded by means of a decision pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the proceedings against Paramount can be concluded by means of a decision pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the commitments offered by Paramount are suitable, necessary and proportionate in order to address the concerns expressed by the Commission in its Statement of Objections. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the commitments offered by Paramount are suitable, necessary and proportionate in order to address the concerns expressed by the Commission in its Statement of Objections.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that, in light of the commitments offered by Paramount, there are no longer grounds for action by the Commission against Paramount without prejudice to Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that, in light of the commitments offered by Paramount, there are no longer grounds for action by the Commission against Paramount without prejudice to Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---

(1)  OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, p. 1.

1

---
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-21-00152-CV

__________________

IN THE INTEREST OF D.R.D. AND D.A.D.

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 317th District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-226,441-B

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Donald Darden, appellant, filed a notice of appeal with the trial court on May 

27, 2021. On July 9, 2021, we warned appellant that the appeal would be dismissed 

without further notice unless he paid the filing fee for the appeal. Despite written 

notice from this Court and an opportunity to cure, to date, appellant has neither 

asserted that he is unable to afford payment of costs for the appeal nor paid the filing 

fee for the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 20.1. In addition, no clerk’s record has 

been filed, and the clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed 

the Court that appellant failed to arrange to pay for the record. See Tex. R. App. P. 
2

37.3(b). On July 27, 2021, we notified the parties that it appeared appellant had not 

established indigent status for the appeal and warned that the appeal would be 

dismissed for want of prosecution unless by August 26, 2021, appellant established 

that he had arranged to pay the fees he is required to pay or that he needed additional 

time to do so. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b). The Court received no response 

to the notice. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). We dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3, 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on September 22, 2021

Opinion Delivered September 23, 2021

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.