alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Mandatory Reporting **of Greenhouse**  **Gas Emissions**
Farm, Ranch, and Rural Communities Federal Advisory Committee March 13, 20082 

# Outline

• Appropriations Language • Purpose and Scope • U.S. 2005 GHG Emissions • Rulemaking Timeline3 

# Appropriations Language FY2008 Consolidated Appropriations Amendment: • “... not less than $3,500,000 shall be provided for activities to develop and publish a draft rule not later than 9 months after the date of enactment of this Act, and a final rule not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, to require mandatory reporting of greenhouse gas emissions above appropriate thresholds in all sectors of the economy...” Accompanying Explanatory Statement: • The Agency shall "use its existing authority under the Clean Air Act" to develop a mandatory GHG reporting rule. "The Agency is further directed to include in its rule reporting of emissions resulting from upstream production and downstream sources , to the extent that the Administrator deems it appropriate. The Administrator shall determine appropriate thresholds of emissions above which reporting is required, and how frequently reports shall be submitted to EPA. The Administrator shall have discretion to use existing reporting requirements for electric generating units under Section 821 of the Clean Air Act...."4 

# Purpose and Scope Objective(s) of the Program – to provide data that will inform and support development of national climate policy Scope of Coverage provided by Congress

– Both upstream and downstream • Upstream: Fuel and Chemical producers/importers (e.g., oil refineries, natural gas processors, HFC producers) • Downstream: GHG emitters (e.g., power plants, iron and steel plants, cement manufacturers Methods

– Will build on methods from existing mandatory and voluntary reporting systems • Federal reporting programs- e.g., NEI, Acid Rain Program, Climate Leaders, 1605(b), National Greenhouse Gas Inventory • State Programs- e.g., California, The Climate Registry, RGGI, other state programs • Corporate Programs- e.g., WRI/WBCSD • Industry Protocols- e.g., API Compendium, CSI Protocol (cement), International Aluminum Institute5 

# U.S. 2005 GHG Emissions6 

# Timeline and Process January 2008 - September 2008 Establish EPA workgroup, develop rule and supporting analyses, stakeholder outreach, inter- and intraAgency review 

### September 2008 Proposal 

### October 2008 – June 2009 Public comment period and hearings, review stakeholder comments, develop final rule and supporting analyses, inter- and intra- Agency review June 2009 Final Rule
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5218 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that oil and gas 

companies will not be eligible for the effective rate reductions enacted 

in 2004 for domestic manufacturers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2006 

Mr. MCDERMOTT (for himself and Mr. LARSON of Connecticut) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

that oil and gas companies will not be eligible for the 

effective rate reductions enacted in 2004 for domestic 

manufacturers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restore a Rational 

5 Tax Rate on Petroleum Production Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 The Congress finds that— 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5218 IH 

1 (1) like many other countries, the United States 

2 has long provided export-related benefits under its 

3 tax law, 

4 (2) producers and refiners of oil and natural 

5 gas were specifically denied the benefits of those ex6 port-related tax provisions, 

7 (3) those export-related tax provisions were suc8 cessfully challenged by the European Union as being 

9 inconsistent with our trade agreements, 

10 (4) the Congress responded by repealing the ex11 port-related benefits and enacting a substitute ben12 efit that was an effective rate reduction for United 

13 States manufacturers, 

14 (5) producers and refiners of oil and natural 

15 gas were made eligible for the rate reduction even 

16 though they suffered no detriment from repeal of the 

17 export-related benefits, and 

18 (6) the decision to provide the effective rate re19 duction to producers and refiners of oil and natural 

20 gas has operated as a reverse windfall profits tax, 

21 lowering the tax rate on the windfall profits they are 

22 currently enjoying. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5218 IH 

1 SEC. 3. DENIAL OF DEDUCTION FOR INCOME ATTRIB2 UTABLE TO DOMESTIC PRODUCTION OF OIL, 

3 NATURAL GAS, OR PRIMARY PRODUCTS 

4 THEREOF. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section 

6 199(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating 

7 to exceptions) is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of 

8 clause (ii), by striking the period at the end of clause (iii) 

9 and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by inserting after clause (iii) the 

10 following new clause: 

11 ‘‘(iv) the production, refining, proc12 essing, transportation, or distribution of 

13 oil, natural gas, or any primary product 

14 thereof.’’. 

15 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 199(c)(4) 

16 of such Code is amended— 

17 (1) in subparagraph (A)(i)(III) by striking 

18 ‘‘electricity, natural gas,’’ and inserting ‘‘electricity’’, 

19 and 

20 (2) in subparagraph (B)(ii) by striking ‘‘elec21 tricity, natural gas,’’ and inserting ‘‘electricity’’. 

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

24 December 31, 2005. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
STATE v. Montrez Benjamin WILLIAMS

233PA12-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 11, 2019

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Kathryn L. VandenBerg, Assistant Appellant Defender, for Williams, Montrez Benjamin.

R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 10th of July 2019 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of July 2019."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 25th day of July 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Board of Directors
VISX, Incorporated: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 33-34374,
33-40519, 33-53806, 33-69044, 333-23999, 333-53041, 333-75207, 333-57524, and 333-116302) on Form
S-8 of VISX, Incorporated of our reports dated March 10, 2005 with respect to the consolidated
balance sheets of VISX, Incorporated as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and the related financial statement
schedule, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of
VISX, Incorporated. KPMG LLP Mountain View, California
March 10, 2005
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lease Equity Appreciation Fund I, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert K. Moskovitz, Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 15, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Robert K. Moskovitz                              
|                        |  |  |  | Name: Robert K. Moskovitz                            
|                        |  |  |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner
#### In the Matter of Commissioner of Social Services, on Behalf of Elizabeth Andujar, Appellant, v Washington Bayona, Respondent.

[718 NYS2d 831]

Order, Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.), entered on or about November 8, 1999, which denied petitioner’s objection to a decision of the Hearing Examiner, dated July 14, 1999, suspend*306ing an order of support, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, the objection granted, and the order of support reinstated.

Under the circumstances presented, the Hearing Examiner erred in suspending respondent’s support obligation. We note, in this regard, that respondent’s financial hardship is solely the result of his purposeful and wrongful conduct culminating in his felony conviction and incarceration (see, *Matter of Knights v Knights,*71 NY2d 865) and the record fails to contain a basis for concluding otherwise. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Mazzarelli, Lerner, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd. at December 31, 1997, and its statement of
income for the year then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the Form 10-K of CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,614,759
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  521,399
<ALLOWANCES>                                   363,410
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      24,113,018
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,327,334
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,993,069
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,794,249
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,993,069
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,164,800
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  709,181
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               131,184
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,899,882
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,899,882
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,899,882
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd. has an
unclassified balance sheet; therefore, no value are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32**













**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerPursuant
      to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
      135**







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Crafty Admiral Enterprises, Ltd. (Registrant)
      on Form 10Q-SB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission filed
      concurrently herewith (the Report), I, Lawrence Siccia, Chief Executive Officer,
      Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Registrant,
      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
      my
      knowledge and belief:





(1)
      the Report fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of Registrant.








Dated: August
      10, 2006           /s/
      Lawrence
      Siccia


By:  Lawrence
      Siccia, Chief
      Executive Officer, Chief
      Financial Officer and


Principal
      Accounting
      Officer of Crafty
      Admiral Enterprises, Ltd.
N O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO NIN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R



### NO. CAAP-18-0000615

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS O F THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GABRIEL STAN, Defendant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CR. NO. 1CPC-17-0001113)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL ( By: Chan, Presiding Judge, Hiraoka and Wadsworth, JJ.) Upon consideration of Defendant-Appellant Gabriel Stan's September 14, 2020 Motion to Dismiss Appeal, the papers in support, and the record, it appears that (1) the appeal has been docketed; (2) Stan seeks to dismiss the appeal; (3) attached to the motion is Stan's declaration showing he understands the consequences of voluntary dismissal, consistent with Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 42(c); and (4) dismissal is authorized by HRAP Rule 42(b) and (c).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, September 17, 2020. /s/ Derrick H.M. Chan Presiding Judge /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000615 17-SEP-2020 08:54 AM
# C_2017403EN.01000101.xml

| 28.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 403/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 403/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8617 — Allianz/LV general insurance businesses)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 403/01)

On 18 October 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8617. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8617. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5431 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5431

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to extend 
                     the tariff duties on ethanol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2006

 Mr. Boswell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to extend 
                     the tariff duties on ethanol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TARIFF DUTIES ON ETHANOL.

    Headings 9901.00.50 and 9901.00.52 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 3007) are each amended in the 
effective period column by striking ``10/1/2007'' each place it appears 
and inserting ``1/1/2011''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Magnitude Information Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Form
10-KSB"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, to the best
of their knowledge, that the Company's Form 10-KSB fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Form 10-KSB, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  March 27, 2003         MAGNITUDE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.

                               By: /s/ Steven D. Rudnik
                                   -----------------------------------------
                                   Steven D. Rudnik
                                   President and Chief Executive Officer

                               By: /s/ Joerg H. Klaube
                                   -----------------------------------------
                                   Joerg H. Klaube
                                   Chief   Financial Officer




                                        1
----

Exhibit 31.1 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to**Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)****as Adopted Pursuant to****Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Long Qin, certify that: 

1. 

I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Rub A Dub Soap, Inc.; 

2. 

Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report; 

3. 

Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

4. 

The Company’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for the Company and have: 

a. 

Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this report is being prepared; 

b. 

Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

c. 

Disclosed inthis report any change in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 

5. 

The Company’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’sauditors and the audit committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

a. 

All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

b. 

Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 9, 2008 

/s/ Long Qin Long Qin Chief Executive Officer 

----