alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5035 

To provide discretionary authority to an immigration judge to determine 

that an alien parent of a United States citizen child should not be 

ordered removed from the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 28, 2006 

Mr. SERRANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide discretionary authority to an immigration judge 

to determine that an alien parent of a United States 

citizen child should not be ordered removed from the 

United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT 

4 TO REMOVAL OF PARENTS OF CITIZEN CHIL5 DREN. 

6 Section 240(c)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1229a(c)(4)) is amended by adding at the 

8 end the following: 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5035 IH 

1 ‘‘(D) DISCRETION OF JUDGE IN CASE OF

2 CITIZEN CHILD.—In the case of an alien de3 portable under section 237 who is the parent of 

4 a child who is a citizen of the United States, 

5 the immigration judge may exercise discretion 

6 to decline to order the alien removed from the 

7 United States if the judge determines that such 

8 removal is clearly against the best interests of 

9 the child, except that this subparagraph shall 

10 not apply to any alien who the judge deter11 mines— 

12 ‘‘(i) is described in section 237(a)(4); 

13 or 

14 ‘‘(ii) has engaged in conduct described 

15 in paragraph (8) or (9) of section 103 of 

16 the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 

17 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7102).’’. 

Æ 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
1

NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 10-1806

_____________

ROBERT R. BAREFOOT;

DEONNA ENTERPRISES, INC.,

 Appellants

v.

WELLNESS PUBLISHING; HOLT M.D. CONSULTING, INC.; 

NATURES BENEFIT, INC.; STEPHEN HOLT,

_____________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

(Civ. No. 3-06-cv-02942)

District Judge: Hon. Joel A. Pisano

Submitted pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, SCIRICA and RENDELL, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: July 27, 2011 )

__________

OPINION

 __________

McKEE, Chief Judge.

Robert Barefoot and Deonna Enterprises, Inc. appeal the district court’s grant of partial 

summary judgment to Wellness Publishing, Holt M.D. Consulting, Inc., Nature’s Benefit, Inc., 

and Stephen Holt. For the reasons set forth below, we will affirm.
2

Because we write primarily for the parties, we need not repeat the facts or procedural 

history of this case. Moreover, the district court has ably summarized the relevant background. 

See Barefoot v. Wellness Publ’g, 2009 WL 4143110 (D.N.J. Nov. 17, 2009). On appeal, 

Appellants argue that the district court erred when it granted summary judgment to Stephen Holt 

and dismissed all claims against him.

In his detailed and thoughtful opinion, Judge Pisano carefully and clearly explained his 

reasons for dismissing Holt from the lawsuit. See id. He reiterated these reasons in his opinion

and order denying Appellants’ motion for reconsideration. See Barefoot v. Wellness Publ’g, 

2010 WL 893571 (D.N.J. Mar. 8, 2010). We can add little to Judge Pisano’s analysis and 

discussion and we will therefore affirm the district court’s order for substantially the same 

reasons as set forth in that opinion.
No. 09-9038.

#### Gary Smith, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1021, 130 S. Ct. 1919,

176 L. Ed. 2d 390,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2521.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 352 Fed. Appx. 709.
# C_2016097EN.01001601.xml

| 12.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 97/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 97/16

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/353 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine apply

(2016/C 97/04)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (2), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/353 (3).

2

3

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/353.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with Section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (4).

4

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

2

(3)  OJ L 67, 12.3.2016, p. 1.

3

(4)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

4

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel, Childhood Obesity RFA HD-08-023.                    

*Date:*                         February 6, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Michele C. Hindi-Alexander, PhD, Division of Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, Eunice Kennedy Shriver, National Institute For Child Health & Development, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5b01, Bethesda, MD 20812-7510, (301) 435-8382,                         *hindialm@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 7, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-483 Filed 1-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
No. 09-10064.

#### Clinton Mitchell, III, Petitioner v. United States.

560 U.S. 915, 130 S. Ct. 3300,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1202,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3914.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 359 Fed. Appx. 396.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6674

VAN PRINCE WELCH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-00-668-2)

Submitted: August 31, 2001 Decided: October 23, 2001

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Van Prince Welch, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Van Prince Welch seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Welch’s

motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. Welch v. Angelone, No. CA-00-

668-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  OF PACIFIC ENERGY GP, INC.  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2003 that is being filed concurrently with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of Pacific Energy GP, Inc., the
general partner of Pacific Energy Partners, L.P. (the "Partnership") hereby certifies that:



| |  | /s/GERALD A. TYWONIUKGerald A. Tywoniuk
November 5, 2003
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Pacific Energy Partners, L.P., and will be retained by Pacific Energy Partners, L.P., and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
2012 Bonus Program



 Exhibit 10.5 
 IGO, INC. 
 2012 EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN 

Summary 
 iGo, Inc.’s Executive Bonus Plan (the “Plan”) is a discretionary cash incentive program designed to motivate participants to achieve the company’s financial and other
performance objectives and to reward them for their achievements when those objectives are met. 
 Eligibility

 Participants are approved solely at the discretion of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee of iGo,
Inc.’s Board of Directors (the “Committee”). No person is automatically entitled to participate in the Plan in any year, and any eligible participant may choose not to participate in the Plan in any year for any reason.

 Administration 
 The Committee is ultimately responsible for administering the Plan. The Committee has all powers and discretion necessary or appropriate to review and approve the Plan and its operation, including, but
not limited to, the power to (a) determine which eligible participants shall be granted bonus awards, (b) prescribe the terms and conditions of bonus awards, (c) interpret the Plan, (d) adopt rules for the administration,
interpretation and application of the Plan as are consistent therewith, and (e) interpret, amend or revoke any such rules. All determinations and decisions made by the Committee and any delegate of the Committee shall be final, conclusive, and
binding on all persons, and shall be given the maximum deference permitted by law. The Committee, in its sole discretion and on such terms and conditions as it may provide, may delegate all or part of its authority and powers under the Plan to one
or more directors, officers and/or managers of the Company. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may amend or terminate the Plan, or any part thereof, at any time and for any reason. 

Award Determination 
 The Committee, in its sole discretion, will approve target bonuses for each participant. Bonuses will be calculated using a formula that includes: (a) the executive’s salary, (b) the
executive’s target bonus, and (c) such other discretionary factors as the Committee determines appropriate given the performance of the Company, and the participant’s contribution to the Company’s overall performance, including,
without limitation, the growth and creation of increased stockholder value through the efficient use of Company assets. Payment of any awards will be made on or before March 15 of the year subsequent to the year in which such award was earned.

 Award Payouts 
 Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, bonuses will be paid on an annual basis, typically in February, and the bonus period is currently the fiscal year period.
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Donald
J. Percenti, President and Chief Executive Officer of American Achievement Group
Holding Corp., ACC Group Holding Corp. and American Achievement Corporation (the
“Companies”), hereby certify that:





(1) The
Quarterly Report of the Companies on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February
23, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.





Date:
April 8, 2008





/s/
      DONALD J. PERCENTIName:
            
            Donald
      J. PercentiTitle:
            
            President
      and Chief Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer)
No. 09-9573.

#### Marsha Chambers, Petitioner v. Texas, et al.

560 U.S. 910, 130 S. Ct. 3284,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1193,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3933,

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 331 Fed. Appx. 294.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135477(64) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 135477 

 COA: 271808 

Genesee CC: 06-017719-FH 

ODRECUS RYZAN CLEMENTS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 24, 

2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

d0519 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 27, 2008 

 Clerk
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 520 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the effective date for 

payment of lump sums to persons awarded the Medal of Honor who 

are in receipt of special pension pursuant to section 1562 of such title, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2005 

Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the effective 

date for payment of lump sums to persons awarded 

the Medal of Honor who are in receipt of special pension 

pursuant to section 1562 of such title, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EFFECTIVE DATE FOR PAYMENT OF LUMP 

4 SUMS TO PERSONS AWARDED THE MEDAL OF 

5 HONOR. 

6 Section 1562(f) of title 38, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 
2 

•HR 520 IH 

1 (1) in paragraph (1) by inserting ‘‘on or after 

2 April 27, 1916,’’ after ‘‘under this section’’; 

3 (2) in paragraph (2) by inserting ‘‘or (4)’’ after 

4 ‘‘paragraph (1)’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

6 paragraphs: 

7 ‘‘(3) If a person otherwise eligible for payment under 

8 paragraph (1) is deceased, the Secretary shall make the 

9 payment to the living person first listed below: 

10 ‘‘(A) The decedent’s spouse. 

11 ‘‘(B) The decedent’s children (in equal shares). 

12 ‘‘(C) The decedent’s dependent parents (in 

13 equal shares). 

14 ‘‘(4) If a person is awarded the Medal of Honor post15 humously on or after April 27, 1916, the Secretary shall 

16 pay, in a lump sum, an amount equal to the total amount 

17 of special pension that the person would have received dur18 ing the period beginning on the first day of the first month 

19 beginning after the date of the act for which the person 

20 was awarded the Medal of Honor and ending on the last 

21 day of the month preceding the month in which the person 

22 died to the living person first listed below: 

23 ‘‘(A) The decedent’s spouse. 

24 ‘‘(B) The decedent’s children (in equal shares). 
3 

•HR 520 IH 

1 ‘‘(C) The decedent’s dependent parents (in 

2 equal shares).’’. 

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 10, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 10175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4998]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 9446]
RIN 1545-BG09


Gain Recognition Agreements With Respect to Certain Transfers of 
Stock or Securities by United States Persons to Foreign Corporations; 
Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to final regulations (TD 
9446) that were published in the Federal Register on Wednesday, 
February 11, 2009 (74 FR 6952) under section 367(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code concerning gain recognition agreements filed by United 
States persons with respect to transfers of stock or securities to 
foreign corporations.

DATES: This correction is effective March 10, 2009, and is applicable 
on February 11, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: S. James Hawes, (202) 622-3860 (not a 
toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations that are the subject of this document are 
under sections 338 and 367 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, final regulations (TD 9446) contains an error that 
may prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification.

List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1

    Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Correction of Publication

0
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is corrected by making the following 
correcting amendment:

PART 1--INCOME TAXES

0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in 
part as follows:

    Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *


0
Par. 2. Section 1.367(a)-8 is amended by revising paragraph (k)(3) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  1.367(a)-8  Gain recognition agreement requirements.

* * * * *
    (k) * * *
    (3) * * * A disposition of the transferred stock or securities 
pursuant to an exchange to which section 351, 354 (but only in a 
reorganization described in section 368(a)(1)(B)), or 721 applies, 
shall not constitute a triggering event if the U.S. transferor enters 
in to a new gain recognition agreement that provides that the 
dispositions described in paragraphs (k)(3)(i) and (ii) of this section 
shall constitute triggering events for purposes of the new gain 
recognition agreement.
* * * * *

Guy Traynor,
Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing 
Division, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).
 [FR Doc. E9-4998 Filed 3-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

December 9, 2005

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-11463

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 03-00277-CR-T-30-TBM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

EFREN DANIEL MARQUEZ-SILVA, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(December 9, 2005)

Before CARNES, PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
2

Duilio A. Espinosa-Montalban, appointed counsel for Efren Daniel

Marquez-Silva in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further

representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of

the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the

appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no

arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Marquez-Silva’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.