alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Better Airports, LLC 

Federal Aviation Regulation- 14 CFR Part 16 

FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST 

THEW AHOO AlRPORT AUTHORITY 

WAHOO MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 

WAHOO, NEBRASKA 

{R;mJJ~ll NOV 5 2014 

FAA Identifier: AHQ 

FAA Docket No. 16-14-08 

Page 1 of2 

PART 16 DOCKETS 

October 30, 2014 

Notice of Correction of Address for Complainant Brad Gage 

as to having a proper complete zip code. 

Certified Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing Correction of Address for Complainant 

Brad Gage as to proper complete zip code for our Title 14, Chapter I Subchapter B, Part 16-

Formal Complaint on the following person at the following address, by USPS Mail Delivery, 

First Class Mail: 

TO: Respondent 

Ms. Melissa Harrell 

City of Wahoo- City Administrator/Clerk/Treasurer 

Ex Officio of the Wahoo Airport Authority 

605 North Broadway 

Wahoo, NE 68066 

Office Telephone 402-443-3222 

Dated this 30th day of October, 2014 

William Foster 

For Complainant- FAA Docket No. 16-14-08 

Walker Ag Supply, LLC, Complainant 

Midwest Spray Services, LLC, Complainant 

Better Airports, LLC - Agent for Complainant 

Better Airports, LLC 

4504 North Versaillflll Avenue 

Dallas, TX 75205 

214-219-5000 Fax 214-219-6000 

Fly® Better Alrporte.com 

Bett£hports Better Airports. LLC 

Formal Complaint Issues, Evidence, and Allegations against the Wahoo Airport Authority from Better 

Airports, LLC, Walker AG Supply, LLC and Midwest Spray Service, LLC September 22, 2014 
Federal Aviation Regulation -14 CFR Part 16 

FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST 

THE WAHOO AIRPORT AUTHORITY 

WAHOO MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 

WAHOO, NEBRASKA 

FAA Identifier: AHQ 

FAA Docket No. 16-14-08 

Page 2 of2 

October 30, 2014 

Notice of Correction of Address for Complainant Brad Gage as to having a 

proper complete zip code. 

I, William Foster agent for Complainant, submit this Notice of Correction of Address for 

Complainant Brad Gage as to a having proper complete zip code. 

The correct zip code for Mr. Brad Gage is 64424. In the previous filing it was stated as 6442 

Mr. Brad Gage corrected zip code and complete address as submitted previously is: 

Mr. Brad Gage 

Midwest Spray Service, LLC 31019 E 260th A venue 

Bethany, MO 64424 

Email Address: bgage@gagefert.com 

Office Telephone: 660- 425-3733 

I h=hy """""' - ~ to dcli=Y md oontoru of lhi• doco~ jV 

By. Wi~:;.~O<"'=l ~ ~ ~~bcrJO, 2014 

Manager, Better Airports, LLC 

FAA Docket No. 16-14-08 Better Airports, LLC 

Bett~irports Better i\iopor!>. LLC 

4504 North Versailles Avenue 

Dallas. TX 75205 

214-219-5000 Fax 214-219-6000 

Fly@BetterAirports.com 

Formal Complaint Issues, Evidence, and Allegations against the Wahoo Airport Authority from Better 

Airports, LLC, Walker AG Supply, LLC and Midwest Spray Service, LLC September 22, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SANTA FE PACIFIC PIPELINE PARTNERS, L.P. AS
OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          42,122
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,563
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                77,909
<PP&E>                                         738,395
<DEPRECIATION>                                 109,701
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 725,818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,545
<BONDS>                                        355,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     262,915
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   725,818
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               240,142
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  152,021
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,518
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 54,018
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             52,275
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    52,275
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.64
        

</TABLE>
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 A1 01 4 . DARNELL POW ELL v . KI MBERLY EDDI NS.

Fo l l owi n g t h e m ag is t rat e co u rt ’ s d eci s i on t h at pl ai n t i ff K i m b erl y E d di n s was

n o t e n t it l ed t o rel i ef o n h er co m p l ai n t ag ai ns t d efen d an t Darn el l Po wel l an d t h at

Po wel l was n o t en t i tl ed t o rel i ef o n h i s co u nt ercl ai m ag ai n s t Ed di n s

, Ed d i n s ap p eal ed

t o s t at e co u rt

. T h e s t at e co u rt en t ered ju d g m en t i n fav o r o f Ed d i n s

, an d Po w el l fi l ed

a m o t i on t o s et as i d e th e ju d g m en t u n d er OCGA § 9 -1 1-6 0 (d ), wh i ch t h e s t at e co u rt

d en ied

. Po wel l t h en fi l ed t h i s d i rect ap p eal

. W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n fo r t wo reas o ns

.

Fi rs t

, an ap p eal fro m a s tat e co u rt o rd er d is p o s i ng o f a de n o v o ap p eal fro m a

m ag i s t rat e co u rt d eci s i o n m u s t b e i n i t iat ed b y fi l i n g an ap p li cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary

rev i ew. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (1 1 ); S t r a ch a n v. Mer i t o r Mt g

. Co r p

. E as t

, 2 1 6 Ga.

Ap p

. 8 2 (4 5 3 SE2 d 1 19 ) (1 9 9 5 ). Seco n d

, an ap p eal fro m an ord er d en y i n g a m o t i o n

t o set as i d e u n d er OCGA § 9 -1 1-6 0 (d ) al s o m us t b e t ak en b y fi l i n g an ap pl i cat i o n fo r

d i s cret i o n ary rev i ew. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (8 ); Ji m El l i s A t l a n t a v. Ad a ms o n

, 2 8 3

Ga. Ap p

. 1 1 6

, 1 1 6 -1 7 (6 40 SE2 d 6 8 8 ) (2 0 0 6 ). Po wel l ’ s fai l u re t o fi l e a d i s cret i o n ary

ap p li cat io n d ep ri v es t hi s Co u rt o f j u r i s d i ct i o n o v er t h i s ap peal

, wh i ch i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. February 23, 2017

02/23/2017
STATE of North Carolina v. Juan Antonia MILLER

No. 363P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Jason C. Yoder, Attorney at Law, for Miller, Juan Antonia

Michael T. Henry, Assistant Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 5th of November 2018 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         352,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  205,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,547,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,708,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,708,500
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               867,200
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  212,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               251,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                402,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   402,800
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.39


</TABLE>
FILED

August 22, 1997

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE 

 JULY 1997 SESSION

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) NO. 01C01-9609-CC-00398

)

Appellee ) RUTHERFORD COUNTY

)

V. ) HON. JAMES K. CLAYTON, JUDGE

)

DOUGLAS MATTES ) (Post-Conviction)

)

Appellant )

 )

FOR THE APPELLANT FOR THE APPELLEE

Douglas Mattes John Knox Walkup

South Central Correctional Center Attorney General and Reporter

Apollo AA-207 450 James Robertson Parkway

P.O. Box 279 Nashville, Tennessee 37243-0493

Clifton, Tennessee 38425-5346

Georgia Blythe Felner

Assistant Attorney General

450 James Robertson Parkway

Nashville, Tennessee 37243-0493

William Whitesell 

District Attorney General

Third Floor Judicial Building

Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37130

OPINION FILED:______

AFFIRMED -- RULE 20 ORDER
2

William M. Barker, Judge

Order

The Appellant, Douglas Mattes, appeals as of right the Rutherford County

Circuit Court’s dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. On February 21,

1995, the Appellant pled guilty to two counts of aggravated sexual battery. Pursuant

to the plea agreement, he received a mitigated sentence of 7.2 years with a 20%

release eligibility. On April 24, 1996, the Board of Paroles reviewed the Appellant’s

parole eligibility and found that the Appellant should remain incarcerated because of

the seriousness of the underlying offense and because he was participating in sex

offender treatment. On August 14, 1996, the Appellant filed a petition requesting postconviction relief. On August 19, 1996, without an evidentiary hearing, the trial court

entered an order dismissing the petition because it was time barred.

The State argues that the statute of limitation for the Appellant’s petition had

expired when it was filed. We agree. 

All post-conviction relief petitions filed after May 10, 1995, are governed by the

Post-Conviction Procedure Act of 1995. Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-201, Compiler’s

Notes (Supp. 1996). Post-Conviction relief must be sought “within one (1) year of the

date of the final action of the highest state appellate court to which an appeal is taken

or, if no appeal is taken, within one year of which the judgment became final . . . .” 

Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-202(a) (Supp. 1996). 

Here, the Appellant filed his petition under the 1995 Act and the one-year

statute of limitation applies. The Appellant’s judgment became final on or about

March 21, 1995, but since the new Post-Conviction Act became effective on May 10,

1995, the limitations period did not expire until May 10, 1996. The Appellant’s petition

was filed in August, 1996, and is, therefore, barred by the statute of limitations. 

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 20 of the

Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals.
3

__________________________

WILLIAM M. BARKER, JUDGE

CONCUR:

__________________________

JOHN H. PEAY, JUDGE

__________________________

JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Optigenex Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel Zwiren,
      the
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Optigenex Inc. and will be retained by Optigenex Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:
      September
      10, 2008





/s/
                DANIEL ZWIREN


Daniel
      Zwiren


Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000839437
<NAME> AMFAC/JMB HAWAII, L.L.C.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,115
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,743
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     61,469
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,975
<PP&E>                                         326,765
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 464,245
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,789
<BONDS>                                        315,004
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   (190,889)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   464,245
<SALES>                                         85,997
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                86,383
<CGS>                                           78,319
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   97,996
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,347
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,649
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (42,609)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,037
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,572)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,572)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (25.6)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (25.6)



</TABLE>
CHAMBERS v. The MOSES H. CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, et al.

147PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 4, 2019

John F. Bloss, Barry L. Kramer, Attorneys at Law, for Chambers, Christopher.

Philip J. Mohr, Brent Fancher Powell, Attorneys at Law, for The Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital, et al.

Burton Craige, Carol L. Brooke, Jack Holtzman, Clermont F. Ripley, William R. Corbett, Deborah Goldstein, Narendra K. Ghosh, Attorneys at Law, for N.C. Justice Center, et al.

Ryan Y. Park, Deputy Solicitor General, Daniel Wilkes, Assistant Attorney Geneal, Matt Burke, Solicitor General Fellow, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 3rd of June 2019 by Defendants:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of June 2019."

Defendants shall have up to and including the 10th day of July 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
CERTIFICATION



I, David J. Gallagher, Chief Financial Officer of QSound Labs, Inc. certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F for 2004 of QSound Labs, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a  15(e) and 15d  15(e)) for the company and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and  procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosures and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.









/s/ David J. Gallagher



David J. Gallagher

Chief Financial Officer





March 21, 2005
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jerry Ruckhaber, Appellant.

[718 NYS2d 902]

Crew III, J.

Appeal from a determination of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.) which classified defendant as a risk level III sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

Upon his plea of guilty to the reduced charge of attempted sodomy in the second degree, defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to an indeterminate prison term of IV2 to 3 years. Thereafter, upon his pending release from custody, defendant was notified that County Court would be conducting a risk level determination hearing pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C). At the hearing, defendant’s request for an adjournment was denied and, after considering the relevant documentary evidence, the court classified defendant as a risk level III sex offender. Claiming that the denial of his adjournment request deprived him of due process, defendant appeals from the risk level determination. Inasmuch as no appeal lies from a risk level determination rendered prior to January 1, 2000 (see, *People v Kearns,*95 NY2d 816, 818; *People v Stevens,*91 NY2d 270, 277-278), this appeal must be dismissed.

Mercure, J. P., Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed.