# Patent

## Title
Oil field treatment fluids with viscosified brines

## Abstract

The present disclosure is directed to a method comprising introducing into a well bore a fluid comprising a zwitterionic polymer. The polymer is prepared by inverse emulsion polymerization of at least one monomer Ab comprising a betaine group and optionally one or more nonionic monomers Ba. The well bore is chosen from a natural gas well bore and an oil well bore.

## Background
BACKGROUND
The present disclosure relates generally to a well bore servicing fluid, and more particularly to the viscosification of a well bore servicing fluid using polymers comprising betaine units.
Natural resources such as gas and oil can be recovered from subterranean formations using well-known techniques. The processes for preparing a well bore for the recovery of such resources often employ various well bore servicing fluids. For example, drilling fluids or muds are typically circulated through well bores as they are drilled into the formation. During the drilling process, the drill bit generates drill cuttings that include small pieces of shale and rock. The drilling fluid carries the drill cuttings in a return flow stream back to the well drilling platform. After terminating the circulation of the drilling fluid, a string of pipe, e.g., casing, is run into the well bore. The drilling fluid is then usually circulated downwardly through the interior of the pipe and upwardly through an annulus, which is located between the exterior of the pipe and the walls of the well bore.
Another fluid known as a gravel packing fluid having relatively large grained sand, e.g., gravel, suspended therein also may be utilized to prevent migration of smaller grained sand from the subterranean formation into the well bore and to maintain the integrity of the formation. In particular, a permeable screen may be placed against the face of the subterranean formation, followed by pumping the gravel packing fluid into the annulus of the well bore such that gravel becomes packed against the exterior of the screen. In addition, a cement slurry may be pumped into the well bore during a primary cementing process in which the cement slurry is placed in the annulus of the well bore and permitted to set into a hard mass (e.g., sheath) to thereby attach the string of pipe to the walls of the well bore and seal the annulus. Subsequent secondary cementing operations, e.g., completion and work over operations, may also be performed using cement slurries.
Yet another fluid, known as a fracturing fluid, is often used to fracture the subterranean formation. The fracturing fluid is pumped into the well bore at a rate and a pressure sufficient to form fractures that extend into the subterranean formation, providing additional pathways through which fluids being produced can flow into the well bores. The fracturing fluid is usually a water-based fluid containing a gelling agent, e.g., a polymeric material that absorbs water and forms a gel as it undergoes hydration. The gelling agent serves to increase the viscosity of the fracturing fluid. The fracturing fluid also typically includes particulate matter known as a proppant, e.g., graded sand, bauxite, or resin coated sand, may be suspended in the fracturing fluid. The proppant becomes deposited into the fractures and thus holds the fractures open after the pressure exerted on the fracturing fluid has been released.
Well bore servicing fluids often include rheology-modifying agents, such as viscosification agents. Viscosification agents can reduce or prevent well known problems associated with, for example, thermal thinning of fluids as they pass down the well bore. An example of such problems includes the inability of drilling fluid to suspend drill cuttings therein as it flows back to the surface. Thus, the drill cuttings may settle out of the drilling fluid and become deposited in undesired locations in the well bore. Furthermore, those fluids containing particles such as a cement slurry, a gravel packing fluid, and a fracturing fluid may experience settling of the particles as the fluids are pumped down the well bore. As a result, the particles are not transported to their proper locations in the well bore. Further, in the absence of such particles, the density of the fluids may drop to a level at which they are incapable of withstanding relatively high fluid pressures downhole, particularly in the case of a high density cement slurry. A need therefore exists for maintaining the viscosity of fluids as they are passed into a well bore so as to reduce or prevent the unwanted settling of materials in those fluids.
Polymers are frequently used as viscosification agents. Polymers used in water-based fluids include acrylamide or methacrylamide polymers, generally acrylamide/acrylate polymers obtained by copolymerization of acrylamide and acrylate or by hydrolysis of polyacrylamide. However, these polymers are sensitive to operating and use conditions. For example, a high shear gradient or a high temperature at the bottom of the well can result in a decrease in viscosifying power. Furthermore, they are sensitive to media of high ionic strength as a result of the presence of carboxylate or sulphonate groups, which also result in a loss of their viscosifying power, even precipitation of the molecules in media highly concentrated in divalent ions.
Polyampholytes carrying both positive charges and negative charges, part of which are formed by water-soluble zwitterionic polymers, can be adapted for applications in saline medium. They are generally more soluble and exhibit greater viscosities in saline medium than in deionized water. The reference is then to antipolyelectrolyte behaviour for this type of polymer. However, they may exhibit an inadequate resistance to the salinity of the aqueous media to be treated or to the shear and temperature conditions of use in the said media.
Polymers comprising a betaine group are also known. The document U.S. Pat. No. 4,788,247 describes terpolymers of units deriving from a sulphobetaine, of units deriving from acrylamide (AM) and of hydrophobic units deriving from an ethoxylated alkyl acrylate. The polymerization is carried out in the presence of large amounts of surfactant (SDS) not making possible the production of groups of the hydrophobic units. Furthermore, the polymerization proves to be difficult to reproduce. The terpolymers exhibit thickening effects on saline media.
The documents U.S. Pat. No. 4,607,076, U.S. Pat. No. 5,153,289, U.S. Pat. No. 4,585,846, U.S. Pat. No. 4,822,847 and/or U.S. Pat. No. 4,708,998 describe polymers of units deriving from a sulphobetaine and of units deriving from vinylpyrrolidone (VP). Many or all of these units are hydrophilic units. The polymers exhibit thickening effects on saline media.
The document U.S. Pat. No. 6,284,854 describes polymers formed of 10 to 50 mol % of units deriving from sulphobetaines and 50 to 90 mol % of hydrophobic units. These polymers are used as biocompatible coatings. The polymerizations are carried out in solution, which does not make possible the production of groups of the hydrophobic units.
The document WO 99/03895 describes a process for the micellar polymerization of certain monomers. The process comprises the preliminary preparation of an initial charge comprising hydrophilic monomers and micelles of hydrophobic monomers. Then a solution of initiator and another solution comprising other hydrophilic monomers and micelles of hydrophobic monomers are added continuously.
WO 01/04201 describes in particular polymers of acrylamide and of sulphobetaines prepared by inverse polymerization and of high molecular weight as additives in the paper industry.
WO 00/01746 describes betaine/acrylamide copolymers with a molar mass limited at most to 2 000 000/3 000 000 and comprising a maximum content of betaine monomer of 6%.
There still exists a need for improved viscosification agents for use as well bore-servicing fluids that exhibit one or more properties, such as: good stability at a relatively high ionic strength and/or good stability in a relatively saline medium, such as a brine; good thickening power for media comprising a relatively high ionic strength, such as saline media, including highly saline media; good hold of the stability and/or thickening at relatively high temperature; and/or a thickening power at low contents of polymer.
SUMMARY
An embodiment of the present disclosure is directed to a method comprising introducing into a well bore a fluid comprising a zwitterionic polymer. The polymer is prepared by inverse emulsion polymerization of at least one monomer Ab comprising a betaine group and optionally one or more nonionic monomers Ba. The well bore is chosen from a natural gas well bore and an oil well bore.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIGS. 1 to 6 illustrate viscosity data for various mixtures, according to embodiments of the present disclosure.



While the disclosure is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail herein. However, it should be understood that the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The present disclosure is directed to a servicing fluid for use in a natural gas or oil field well bore. The servicing fluid includes an aqueous brine media and a zwitterionic polymer. The zwitterionic polymer is prepared by polymerization of at least one monomer, Ab, comprising a betaine group and optionally one or more nonionic monomers, Ba.
According to the present disclosure, the monomer, Ab, can be chosen from at least one of the following monomers:
A) substituted or unsubstituted alkylsulphonates or alkylphosphonates of dialkylammonioalkyl acrylates, dialkylammonioalkyl methacrylates, dialkylammonioalkyl acrylamides, dialkylammonioalkyl methacrylamides, dialkylammonioalkoxyalkyl acrylates, dialkylammonioalkoxyalkyl methacrylates, dialkylammonioalkoxyalkyl acrylamides, and dialkylammonioalkoxyalkyl methacrylamides, such as:

    
    
        1) sulphopropyldimethylammonioethyl methacrylate, sold by Raschigunder the name SPE (Formula 1):
    
    






    
    
        2) sulphoethyldimethylammonioethyl methacrylate (Formula 2) and sulphobutyldimethylammonioethyl methacrylate (Formula 3):
    
    






    
    
         the synthesis of which is described in the paper “Sulfobetaine zwitterionomers based on n-butyl acrylate and 2-ethoxyethyl acrylate: monomer synthesis and copolymerization behavior”, Journal of Polymer Science, 40, 511-523 (2002), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
        3) sulphohydroxypropyldimethylammonioethyl methacrylate (SHPE) (Formula 4):
    
    






    
    
        4) sulphopropyldimethylammoniopropylacrylamide (Formula 5):
    
    






    
    
         the synthesis of which is described in the paper “Synthesis and solubility of the poly(sulfobetaine)s and the corresponding cationic polymers: 1. Synthesis and characterization of sulfobetaines and the corresponding cationic monomers by nuclear magnetic resonance spectra”, Wen-Fu Lee and Chan-Chang Tsai, Polymer, 35 (10), 2210-2217 (1994), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
        5) sulphopropyldimethylammoniopropylmethacrylamide, sold by Raschig under the name SPP (Formula 6):
    
    






    
    
        6) sulphopropyldimethylammonioethyl acrylate, sold by Raschig under the name SPDA (Formula 7):
    
    






    
    
        7) sulphohydroxypropyldimethylammoniopropylmethacrylamide (“SHPP”) (Formula 8)
    
    






    
    
        8) sulphopropyldiethylammonioethoxyethyl methacrylate (Formula 9)
    
    






    
    
         the synthesis of which is described in the paper “Poly(sulphopropylbetaines): 1. Synthesis and characterization”, V. M. Monroy Soto and J. C. Galin, Polymer, 1984, Vol. 25, 121-128, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
        9) sulphohydroxypropyldiethylammonioethyl methacrylate (Formula 10)
    
    






B) substituted or unsubstituted heterocyclic betaine monomers, such as:

    
    
        1) sulphobetaines derived from piperazine, examples which include compounds of Formulae 11, 12 and 13,
    
    






    
    
         the synthesis of which is described in the paper “Hydrophobically Modified Zwitterionic Polymers: Synthesis, Bulk Properties, and Miscibility with Inorganic Salts”, P. Koberle and A. Laschewsky, Macromolecules, 27, 2165-2173 (1994), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
        2) sulphobetaines derived from vinyl substituted pyridines, such as 2-vinylpyridine and 4-vinylpyridine, examples of which include:
        
            a) 2-vinyl-1-(3-sulphopropyl)pyridinium betaine (2SPV or “SPV”) (Formula 14), sold by Raschig under the name SPV:
        
        
    
    






    
    
        
        
            b) 4-vinyl-1-(3-sulphopropyl)pyridinium betaine (“4SPV”) (Formula 15),
        
        
    
    






    
    
        
        
             the synthesis of which is disclosed in the paper “Evidence of ionic aggregates in some ampholytic polymers by transmission electron microscopy”, V. M. Casta{umlaut over (n)}o and A. E. Gonzalez, J. Cardoso, O. Manero and V. M. Monroy, J. Mater. Res., 5 (3), 654-657 (1990), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
        
        
        3) sulphobetaines derived from imidazoles, such as:
        
            a) 1-vinyl-3-(3-sulphopropyl)imidazolium betaine (Formula 16)
        
        
    
    






    
    
        
        
             the synthesis of which is described in the paper “Aqueous solution properties of a poly(vinyl imidazolium sulphobetaine)”, J. C. Salamone, W. Volkson, A. P. Oison, S. C. Israel, Polymer, 19, 1157-1162 (1978), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
        
        
    
    


C) substituted or unsubstituted alkylsulphonates or alkylphosphonates of dialkylammonioalkylallylics, such as:

    
    
        1) sulphopropylmethyldiallylammonium betaine (17):
    
    






    
    
         the synthesis of which is described in the paper “New poly(carbobetaine)s made from zwitterionic diallylammonium monomers”, Favresse, Philippe; Laschewsky, Andre, Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, 200(4), 887-895 (1999), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
    
    


D) substituted or unsubstituted alkylsulphonates or alkylphosphonates of dialkylammonioalkylstyrenes, such as the compounds of formulae 18 and 19:




the synthesis of which is described in the paper “Hydrophobically Modified Zwitterionic Polymers: Synthesis, Bulk Properties, and Miscibility with Inorganic Salts”, P. Koberle and A. Laschewsky, Macromolecules, 27, 2165-2173 (1994), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

E) substituted or unsubstituted betaines resulting from ethylenically unsaturated anhydrides and dienes, such as the compounds of Formulae 20 and 21:








the synthesis of which is described in the paper “Hydrophobically Modified Zwitterionic Polymers: Synthesis, Bulk Properties, and Miscibility with Inorganic Salts”, P. Koberle and A. Laschewsky, Macromolecules, 27, 2165-2173 (1994), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

F) substituted or unsubstituted phosphobetaines, such as the compounds of formula 22 (“MPC”) and formula 23 (“VPC”):




The synthesis of MPC and of VPC is described in EP 810 239 B1 (Biocompatibles, Alister et al.), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

In embodiments where the monomers Ab described above are substituted, the substituents can be chosen from any suitable groups that will not be significantly detrimental to a desired function of these compounds, such as the ability to provide viscosification of a well bore servicing fluid. The substituents can be bonded to, for example, the cyclic moieties and/or linear carbon chain moieties of the compounds. Examples of suitable substituents can include hydroxyl groups, such as in formulae 4, 8 and 10 above, as well as C1 to C6 alkyl groups.
In an embodiment, the betaines can be monomers of formula 24:




or of formula 25:




in which:

    
    
        R1 is hydrogen or methyl,
        R2 and R3, which are identical or different, are hydrogen or alkyls having from 1 to 6 carbon atoms,
        Y1 is —O— or NR2,
        Z− is SO3−,
        m is 2 or 3, and
        n is 1-6.
    
    


In an embodiment, the monomer Ab can be chosen from sulphopropyldimethylammonioethyl methacrylate (SPE), sulphoethyldimethylammonioethyl methacrylate, sulphobutyldimethylammonioethyl methacrylate, sulphohydroxypropyldimethylammonioethyl methacrylate (SHPE), sulphopropyldimethylammoniopropylacrylamide, sulphopropyldimethylammoniopropylmethacrylamide (SPP), sulphohydroxypropyldimethylammoniopropylmethacrylamide (SHPP), sulphopropyldimethylammonioethyl acrylate (SPDA), sulphopropyldiethylammonioethoxyethyl methacrylate, 2-vinyl-1-(3-sulphopropyl)pyridinium betaine, 4-vinyl-1-(3-sulphopropyl)pyridinium betaine, 1-vinyl-3-(3-sulphopropyl)imidazolium betaine, sulphopropylmethyldiallylammonium betaine.
In another exemplary embodiment, monomer Ab corresponds to one of the following formulae:




The hydrophilic nonionic monomer Ba can be chosen to be one or more of: hydroxyethyl acrylate, hydroxyethyl methacrylate, hydroxypropyl acrylate and hydroxypropyl methacrylate, acrylamide (AM), methacrylamide, N-methylolacrylamide, dimethylacrylamide, dimethylmethacrylamide, polyethylene oxide, polypropylene oxide, polyethylene/polypropylene oxide copolymers (which can be any suitable type of copolymer, such as block or random copolymers), α-methacrylates, vinyl alcohol or vinylpyrrolidone.
In an embodiment, the hydrophilic nonionic monomer Ba is acrylamide (AM) and/or monomer Ab includes one or both of sulphopropyldimethylammonioethyl methacrylate (SPE) and sulphopropyldimethylammoniopropylmethacrylamide (SPP). In an embodiment, the hydrophilic nonionic monomer Ba is acrylamide (AM) and the monomer Ab is SPP.
The polymers are thus prepared by an inverse polymerization process which comprises the following stages: a1) preparation of the inverse emulsion, and a2) polymerization. In an embodiment, stage a1) is carried out by emulsification of a mixture comprising the aqueous phase comprising the monomers, the external phase and at least one emulsifying agent. The polymerization is carried out by bringing together the monomers Ab and optionally the monomers Ba with an initiator compound that can generate free radicals.
The temperature employed for the polymerization can be any suitable temperature. For example, the temperature can range from about ambient temperature to about 75° C., depending on the initiating system chosen.
Any suitable concentration of monomers can be employed in the polymerization process. In an embodiment, the molar ratio of the monomers Ab to the monomers Ba ranges from about 4:96 to about 40:60, such as from about 7:93 to about 30:70.
As the external phase, any suitable inert hydrophobic liquid can be employed. Examples of suitable hydrophobic liquids can include aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons and halocarbons, such as toluene, xylene, o-dichlorobenzene, perchloroethylene, hexane, heptane, kerosene, a mineral oil and Isopar M (a substance of isoparaffin type of high purity sold by Exxon Corporation). Likewise, use may be made of any suitable water-in-oil emulsifying agent, such as hexadecyl sodium phthalate, sorbitan monooleate, sorbitan monostearate, mono- and diglycerides, polyethoxylated sorbitol hexaoleate, octyl sodium phthalate or stearyl sodium phthalate. In an embodiment, the emulsifying agent is sorbitan monooleate. Example concentrations of the emulsifying agent can range from about 0.5% to about 10%, such as from about 1% to about 5%, by weight of the emulsion.
The ratio of the aqueous phase to the external phase can vary within wide limits. For example, the water-in-oil emulsion can comprise from about 20% to about 80% of aqueous phase and thus from about 80% to about 20% of oil phase, these percentages being based on the total weight of the water-in-oil emulsion. In an embodiment, a ratio of the aqueous phase to the oil phase is about 70% to about 75% aqueous phase to about 30% to about 25% oil phase, where percentages are based on the total weight of the water-in-oil emulsion.
As discussed above, the polymerization is initiated by means of a chemical initiator comprising free radicals. This initiator can be dissolved either in the oil phase or in the aqueous phase, according to its solubility characteristics. Examples of water-soluble initiators can include 4,4′-azobis[4-cyanovaleric acid] (abbreviated to ACVA), potassium persulphate (K2S2O8) and t-butyl hydroperoxide. Use may also be made of water-soluble initiators of redox type, such as bromate/bisulphite or metabisulphite (for example, KBrO3/NaHSO3 or KBrO3/NaS2O5) or persulphate/bisulphite initiators. Examples of oil-soluble initiators include azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) and 2,2′-azobis(2,4-dimethylvaleronitrile) (ADVN).
The proportion of chemical initiator used depends on several factors. For instance, if it is necessary to maintain a desired reaction rate, the proportion of initiator can be increased as the reaction temperature falls. By adjusting the reaction temperature and the proportion of initiator, it may be possible to carry out the polymerization in a reasonable time and with a reasonable conversion of monomer to polymer, retaining the advantages of a polymerization at low temperatures.
The water-soluble zwitterionic polymers of the present invention can be used as viscosifying agents for aqueous solutions over a wide range of salinity and of temperature and as agent for modifying surfaces of particles in aqueous suspensions. For these uses/applications, the polymer can be provided in any practical form. For example, the polymer can be provided in a dry solid form or in a vectorized form, such as in a solution, an emulsion or a suspension. In an embodiment, the polymer is provided in the form of an aqueous solution. In an example, the aqueous solution can comprise from about 5 to about 50% by weight, such as from about 10 to about 30% by weight, of the polymer.
The present disclosure also relates to compositions comprising the polymer. The polymer can help to increase the viscosity of the compositions. The polymer can be in the form of an aqueous composition comprising the inverse emulsion with the aqueous phase comprising the polymer dispersed in the form of droplets in a hydrophobic external phase and other ingredients chosen from a surfactant, an organic salt, an inorganic salt, a detergent and a thickener.
The aqueous composition can additionally comprise ionic entities, such as inorganic salts or organic salts, such as acid salts, it being possible for the salts to exhibit a surface-active or non-surface-active nature. The composition can be a “saline” composition. In an embodiment, the polymer can make it possible to increase the viscosity of compositions comprising ions, such as saline compositions, and in particular, of compositions of relatively high ionic strength. For instance, the polymer can make it possible to increase the viscosity of compositions comprising relatively large amounts of salts, such as compositions based on seawater or on brines.
The ionic strength of the composition can range from low to high, depending on the application. It has been found that the polymer can be effective as thickening agent at a zero or low ionic strength and that it can, surprisingly, remain effective at a high ionic strength. The ionic strength can, for example, be at least about 0.7 mol/l or at least about 1 mol/l, or even greater than 2 mol/l, after saturation of the salt or mixture of salts. In an embodiment, the composition can comprise at least 25 g/l of a salt (11 pounds per gallon density), such as, for example, about 35 g/l of a salt or more.
Any suitable salts can be employed in the compositions of the present application. Suitable salts include monovalent, divalent and polyvalent salts. In an embodiment, the salts can include a cation selected from alkali metal, alkaline earth metal, ammonium, manganese, and zinc cations, and an anion selected from halides, oxides, carbonates, nitrates, sulfates, acetates and formate anions. For example, the salt can be potassium chloride, sodium chloride, sodium bromide, calcium chloride, calcium bromide, zinc bromide, zinc formate, zinc oxide and mixtures of these salts.
In an embodiment, the composition can be formed of seawater or a brine comprising the polymer. In an embodiment, the composition is a brine comprising divalent ions, such as those ions formed from the disassociation of alkaline earth metal salts, such as salts of calcium or magnesium, including CaCl2, CaBr2, MgCl2 or MgBr2; or other divalent ion forming salts, such as salts of zinc (e.g., ZnCl2 or ZnBr2). The concentration of the divalent ions in the brine can vary. In an example, the brine can comprise divalent salts in an amount greater than about 25% by weight of the total salts in the brine.
In an embodiment, the composition can comprise at least one surfactant. Any suitable surfactant can be employed, including surfactants employed during the preparation of the polymer. One example of suitable surfactants are the ammonium salts of polyarylphenyl ether sulfate, such as the ammonium salt of tristyrylphenol ethoxylate sulfate, which is sold under the tradename SOPROPHOR 4 D 384, by RHODIA.
The amount of surfactant can be any suitable amount, such as the amount introduced with the polymer, if a surfactant was used during the preparation of the polymer. In an embodiment, surfactant can be added to the composition in addition to the surfactant employed during preparation of the polymer. Example surfactant concentrations can range from at least about 0.001% by weight, such as at least 0.01% or at least 0.1% by weight, of surfactant with respect to the polymer.
The total amount of surfactant included in the composition can vary depending upon the use of the composition. For example, the amount can range from the values indicated above to about 20%, by weight, such as from about 5% to about 15% by weight of surfactant with respect to the polymer.
The amount by weight of polymer in the compositions can depend on the rheological behaviour desired and/or on the thickening strength desired for the compositions and on the possible presence of other compounds, in particular ionic compounds, such as salts. In an embodiment, the amount by weight can be greater than about 0.01% by weight, with respect to the composition, for example greater than about 0.1% by weight and often greater than or equal to about 0.5% or about 1% by weight. The amount will generally be less than or equal to about 20% by weight, such as about 10% by weight. Advantageous thickenings may in some instances be observed at polymer concentrations ranging from about 0.1% to about 1% by weight, and/or from about 1% to about 2% by weight, and/or from about 2% to about 3% by weight, and/or from about 3% to about 4% by weight, and/or from about 4% to about 5% by weight.
As discussed above, the compositions of the present application can be employed as a well bore servicing fluid for oil wells and natural gas wells, including subsea wells. In an embodiment, the zwitterionic polymers are used as viscosifying agents in brine formulations employed in well bores of oil and gas wells. Examples of such fluids include: drilling fluids, gravel packing fluids, fracturing fluids, frac packing fluids, completion fluids, and fluids used for completion pills.
Thus, the present disclosure can be directed to a method of drilling an oil or natural gas well bore in which the fluids of the present application are utilized as a drilling fluid. In an embodiment, well bore servicing fluids of the present disclosure comprising an aqueous media, such as a brine, and a zwitterionic polymer can be circulated through a well bore as it is drilled into a subterranean formation. The drilling fluid can carry drill cuttings created by the drilling process in a return flow stream back to the well drilling platform. The circulation of the drilling fluid can be terminated after drilling is stopped. Then a string of pipe, such as, for example, an annular pipe casing, can be run into the well bore. In an optional second stage of the process, the well bore servicing fluid of the present application can then be circulated through the well bore to remove additional drill cuttings. For example, the well bore servicing fluid can be pumped downwardly through the interior of the pipe and upwardly through an annulus, which is located between the exterior of the pipe and the walls of the well bore, to thereby carry the cuttings out of the well bore.
In an embodiment, the drilling fluid used during the second stage of the process may be different than the drilling fluid used during the drilling stage. For example, the well bore servicing fluids of the present disclosure can be employed during the drilling stage, while a second drilling fluid other than the well bore servicing fluids of the present disclosure can be employed during the second stage, or vice versa.
The well bore servicing fluids of the present application can be employed as gravel packing fluids. In an embodiment, a well bore servicing fluid comprising an aqueous media, such as a brine, and a zwitterionic polymer can further comprise gravel suspended therein. As part of the gravel packing process, a permeable screen may be placed against the face of the subterranean formation, followed by pumping the well bore servicing fluid comprising the gravel into the annulus of the well bore such that gravel becomes packed against the exterior of the screen.
The well bore servicing fluids of the present application can also be employed as fracturing fluids. In an embodiment, a well bore servicing fluid of the present disclosure comprising a zwitterionic polymer and an aqueous media, such as a brine, can be used to fracture a subterranean formation. The well bore servicing fluid is pumped into the well bore at a rate and a pressure sufficient to form fractures that extend into the subterranean formation, providing additional pathways through which fluids being produced can flow into the well bores. In an embodiment, the well bore servicing fluid can include a proppant. Well known propants used in fracturing include graded sand, bauxite, or resin coated sand, any of which may be suspended in the fracturing fluid. The proppant becomes deposited into the fractures and thus holds the fractures open after the pressure exerted on the fracturing fluid has been released.
The compositions of the present disclosure, whatever the use, can comprise dispersed liquid particles (emulsified droplets) or dispersed solid particles. Liquid particles can, for example, be synthetic oils (for example silicone oils) or oils of vegetable or mineral origin. The solid particles can in particular be sand, density-modifying particles, debris and/or polymeric particles. The polymer can promote the suspending of these particles during the time necessary for the use of the composition and/or during a storage time. It can also alternatively contribute to easy transportation of the particles, in order to position them at or to move them to an appropriate spot.
The fluids of the present disclosure can include additional ingredients to modify the rheological and chemical properties of the fluid. Clayey materials such as bentonite, attapulgite, sepiolite or other material commonly used in drilling fluids can be included to provide drilling muds to lubricate the drill strings and suspend drill cuttings. The fluids can also include buffering agents or pH control additives. Buffering agents can be used in well bore servicing fluids to maintain the desired pH of the fluid. If the pH of the well bore servicing fluid becomes too low, severe degradation of the included polymers, such as the viscosifying agents, may result. Examples of suitable buffering agents include, but are not limited to: sodium phosphate, sodium hydrogen phosphate, boric acid-sodium hydroxide, citric acid-sodium hydroxide, boric acid-borax, sodium bicarbonate, ammonium salts, sodium salts, potassium salts, dibasic phosphate, tribasic phosphate, lime, slaked lime, magnesium oxide, basic magnesium carbonate, calcium oxide and zinc oxide.
The temperature and the pressure of the fluid can vary according to the use which is made of the fluid and its environment. The polymer can remain effective over a relatively wide range of temperatures, including under conditions requiring relatively high temperatures, in particular in the fields of oil and/or gas extraction. For example, the composition can have a temperature ranging from about 20° C. to relatively high temperatures, such as greater than or equal to 50° C., greater than or equal to 70° C., greater than or equal to 100° C., greater than or equal to 150° C. or greater than or equal to 180° C. The pressure can be any suitable pressure, such as, for example, atmospheric pressure or a greater pressure.
A reduced specific viscosity can be measured by dissolving the polymer in a 20% by weight aqueous NaCl solution. The intrinsic viscosity η can then be obtained by linear extrapolation of the reduced specific viscosity to zero concentration of polymer. The slope of this extrapolation is equal to k′(η)2, k′ being the Huggins coefficient. This method of calculating η is described in detail in the publication Polymer Handbook (4th edition), J. Brandrup, E. H. Immergut and E. A. Grulke, Wiley (1999), the description of calculating η in the Polymer Handbook being hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The specific viscosity makes it possible to have indirect access to the molecular weights of greater than approximately 2 000 000, which cannot be directly determined experimentally. In an embodiment of the present application, the zwitterionic polymers exhibit an intrinsic viscosity of about 600 ml/g or greater, such as about 1000 ml/g or greater, where the reduced specific viscosity is measured by dissolving the polymer in a 20% by weight aqueous NaCl solution, as described above.
Other characteristics or advantages of the invention may become apparent in the light of the examples which follow, given by way of illustration without a limiting nature.
Example 1
Comparative
Solution polymerization-poly(acrylamide/SPP) 90/10 mol/mol
Copolymerization:
82.4 g of 50% acrylamide in water, 18.8 g of SPP and 94.4 g of water are added to a 500 ml three-necked round-bottom flask equipped with a nitrogen inlet, a mechanical stirrer (anchor), a reflux condenser and temperature regulation via a thermostatically controlled bath of oil. The temperature of the reaction medium is brought to 65° C. while flushing with nitrogen. 0.3 g of sodium persulphate dissolved in 5 g of water is added at 65° C. The temperature of the reaction medium is maintained for 24 h. The combined mixture is subsequently cooled to ambient temperature. The final product exists in the form of a translucent gel.
The molar mass of the polymer obtained can be conventionally adjusted by modifying the amount of initiator introduced, the reaction temperature or the addition of a transfer agent. The concentrations of initiator and the corresponding molar masses, determined by steric exclusion chromatography (+CVG ref) are referenced in Table 1 below:









TABLE 1






Concentration of initiator




with respect to the
Mw by chromatography


Reference
monomers
(kg/mol)

















Example 1-1
0.2% + transfer agent
63


Example 1-2
5%
370









Example 2
Inverse Emulsion polymerization-poly(acrylamide/SPP) 90/10 mol/mol
The synthesis takes place in two stages: preparation of an emulsion comprising the monomers and the surfactants, followed by copolymerization.
Preparation of an emulsion comprising the monomers and the surfactants:
110.2 g of Shellsol D80 (Shell Chemicals), 18.5 g of G946 (ICI), 9.3 g of Rhodasurf LA-3 (Rhodia) and 4.9 g of Hypermer B261 (Uniquema) are added to a 250 ml glass beaker with magnetic stirring. Stirring is maintained until a clear solution is obtained (Mixture 1). 199.8 g of 50% acrylamide in water, 91.3 g of 50% SPP in water, 0.2 g of Versene 100 (Dow) and 2.9 g of sodium sulphate are added to a 500 ml glass beaker with magnetic stirring. Stirring is maintained until a clear solution is obtained (Mixture 2). Mixture 2 is subsequently introduced into Mixture 1 with magnetic stirring. Stirring is maintained for 5 min and then all the liquid is added to a mixer of rotor/stator type in order to be mixed for 10 s (6000 revolutions/min). The stable emulsion is thus obtained.
Copolymerization:
All the emulsion prepared immediately above is added to a 1 litre jacketed glass reactor equipped with a nitrogen inlet, a mechanical stirrer, a reflux condenser and temperature regulation via a thermostatically controlled bath. The temperature of the reaction medium is brought to 45° C. while flushing with nitrogen. 0.2 g of Trigonox 25C75 (Akzo Nobel) is added at 45° C. An additional 0.2 g of Trigonox 25C75 is added 4 hours after this addition. The temperature of the reaction medium is subsequently brought to 55° C. for 3 h. The combined mixture is cooled to ambient temperature.
The final emulsion exists in the form of a translucent and slightly coloured liquid which is not very viscous.
By following the procedure described above, polymers of variable molar masses are produced by modifying the level of initiator. However, for numerous tests, the molar masses are too high to be measured by steric exclusion chromatography. The molar masses are likely significantly greater than 3×106 g/mol. Furthermore, copolymers with variable acrylamide/SPP ratios are also synthesized. The characteristics of the products are referenced in Table 2 below:









TABLE 2







Mw by




chromatography


Reference
Operating conditions
(kg/mol)







Example 2-1
Concentration initiator = 0.1 mol %
2000



vs monomers, T = 65° C.



[Am]/[SPP] = 90/10 mol/mol


Example 2-2
Concentration initiator = 0.05 mol
not measurable



% vs monomers, T = 65° C.



[Am]/[SPP] = 90/10 mol/mol


Example 2-3
Concentration initiator = 0.05 mol %
not measurable



vs monomers, T = 55° C.



[Am]/[SPP] = 90/10 mol/mol


Example 2-4
Concentration initiator = 0.1 mol %
not measurable



vs monomers,



[Am]/[SPP] = 90/10 mol/mol


Example 2-5
Concentration initiator = 0.02 mol
not measurable



% vs monomers,



[Am]/[SPP] = 90/10 mol/mol


Example 2-6
Concentration initiator = 0.1 mol %
not measurable



vs monomers,



[Am]/[SPP] = 98/2 mol/mol


Example 2-7
Concentration initiator = 0.1 mol %
not measurable



vs monomers,



[Am]/[SPP] = 95/5 mol/mol


Example 2-8
Concentration initiator = 0.1 mol %
not measurable



vs monomers,



[Am]/[SPP] = 80/20 mol/mol


Example 2-9
Concentration initiator = 0.1 mol %
not measurable



vs monomers,



[Am]/[SPP] = 70/30 mol/mol


Example 2-10
Concentration initiator = 0.1 mol %
not measurable



vs monomers,



[Am]/[SPP] = 50/50 mol/mol









Example 3
Evaluations
The viscosities of the polymer solutions are evaluated using an AR2000 rheometer (TA Instrument, Surrey, United Kingdom) provided with geometry of Couette type (internal radius=14 mm; external radius=15 mm and height=42 mm).
Molar Masses
The viscosity contributed by the dissolution of a polymer is represented by its intrinsic viscosity (the linear extrapolation to zero concentration of the reduced specific viscosity)




  
    
      [
      η
      ]
    
    =
    
      
        lim
        
          c
          →
          0
        
      
      ⁢
      
        
          η
          -
          
            η
            0
          
        
        
          
            η
            0
          
          ⁢
          c
        
      
    
  
  ,




where η is the viscosity of the solution comprising the polymer, η0 is the viscosity of the solvent and c is the concentration of polymer.

The intrinsic viscosity, for a polymer chemical composition under given solvent conditions, is related to the molar mass by the Mark-Houwink relationship. See Polymer Handbook (4th edition), J. Brandrup, E. H. Immergut and E. A. Grulke, Wiley (1999), the description of the Mark-Houwink relationship in the Polymer Handbook being hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
[η]=KMa, with “K” and “a” constants which depend on the chemical composition of the polymer and on the solvent and temperature.
The polymers of Examples 1 and 2 are purified and dried and then dissolved in a 20% by weight NaCl solution at different concentrations of polymer. The reduced specific viscosity curves as a function of the polymer concentration make it possible to determine the intrinsic viscosity given in Table 3 below.











TABLE 3








Mw by





chromatography
Intrinsic viscosity



Reference
(kg/mol)
(ml/g)



















Solution
Example 1-1
63
37


Solution
Example 1-2
370
112


Inverse emulsion
Example 2-1
2000
320


Inverse emulsion
Example 2-2
not measurable
470


Inverse emulsion
Example 2-3
not measurable
550


Inverse emulsion
Example 2-4
not measurable
850


Inverse emulsion
Example 2-5
not measurable
1100









Rheology in Saline Solutions
The copolymers described in Examples 1 and 2 are used in the solutions of variable salinities described in Table 4 below.










TABLE 4






Composition (w salt per

Viscosity at 25° C.


Reference
1 kg of solution)
Density
(mPa · s)


















ZnBr2/CaBr2
ZnBr2 550 g/CaBr2 230 g
2.3
25.2


CaCl2/CaBr2
CaCl2 230 g/CaBr2 330 g
1.7
5.9


45% NaBr
NaBr 446 g
1.5
2.4


20% NaCl
NaCl 200 g
1.15
1.48


10% NaCl
NaCl 100 g
1.07
1.2


 5% NaCl
NaCl 50 g
1.03
1.0


Purified water
/
0.99
0.95









The polymers are purified and dried. The powders obtained are dissolved at 10 g/l with magnetic stirring. The viscosities are measured 72 h after the preparation of the samples and the values obtained are collated in Table 5 below.







TABLE 5







Relative viscosity at a polymer concentration at 10 g/l (gradient of 1 s−1 at


25° C.).















Intrinsic
Relative
Relative
Relative
Relative




viscosity
viscosity:
viscosity:
viscosity:
viscosity:



Reference
(ml/g)
Purified water
5% NaCl
10% NaCl
20% NaCl

















Solution
Example 1-1
37
1.3
1.5
1.3
1.4


Solution
Example 1-2
112
2.5
2.3
2.1
2.4


Inverse
Example 2-1
320
14
10
9.2
11


emulsion


Inverse
Example 2-2
470
16
18
19
22


emulsion


Inverse
Example 2-3
550
51
60
72
82


emulsion


Inverse
Example 2-4
850
59
98
102
108


emulsion


Inverse
Example 2-5
1100
100
179
165
196


emulsion









These results demonstrate that the viscosifying power of the polymers according to the invention increases as the molar mass (and the intrinsic viscosity) increases and as the salinity increases.
Direct Dispersion
The polymers of Example 2, synthesized by inverse emulsion polymerization with the composition AM/SPP (90/10), are dispersed directly in the brines.
5% by weight of surfactant Soprophor 4D384 (Rhodia) are added to the inverse emulsion 5 minutes before mixing with the brines. The amount necessary to obtain 10 g/l of polymer is dispersed in the brines. These preparations are, in a first step, stirred vigorously by hand for a few moments and then stirred with a magnetic bar until they are used.
Relative viscosities at a polymer concentration of 10 g/l are measured here 24 h after the preparation of the samples (gradient of 1 s−1 at 25° C.) and the values are collated in Table 6 below.











TABLE 6






Intrinsic
Relative
Relative
Relative



viscosity
viscosity:
viscosity:
viscosity:


Reference
(ml/g)
NaBr
CaCl2/CaBr2
ZnBr2/CaBr2



















Example 2-1
320
17
25
115


Example 2-2
470
59
110
529


Example 2-3
550
77
217
549


Example 2-4
850
114
437
797









These results demonstrate that the viscosifying power of the polymers according to the invention is very high in brines highly concentrated in salt.
High-Temperature Stability
Solutions of polymers comprising variable levels of SPP are prepared according to the protocol described in Example 2 at a concentration by weight of 0.5% in the brine ZnBr2/CaBr2.
The viscosities of these solutions are measured after mixing at ambient temperature and then after ageing in pressurized cells (acid digestion bombs—Parr instruments) in a rolling oven at 160° C. for 6 h.
The aged solutions may exhibit solid residues; if appropriate, these solutions are filtered through a 100 μm cloth. The viscosities are then measured at 90° C. and the values are collated in Table 7 below.







TABLE 7







Relative viscosity at a polymer concentration of 0.5% by


weight (gradient of 100 s−1 at 90° C.).













Relative viscosity:



SPP level
Relative viscosity:
solutions aged



(mol %)
initial solution
at 160° C.














Example 2-6
2
51
1.0
Precipitate


Example 2-7
5
53
1.1
Precipitate


Example 2-4
10
60
9.7
Homogeneous






solution


Example 2-8
20
33
8.8
Homogeneous






solution


Example 2-9
30
13.5
11.2
Homogeneous






solution


Example 2-10
50
5.5
4.8
Homogeneous






solution









These results demonstrate that the high-temperature stability of the polymers according to the invention dissolved in brines is directly related to the level of SPP incorporated in the polymer. In this instance, a minimum level of 10 mol % is necessary to maintain the homogeneity of the solution if the latter is exposed for a long time to high temperatures.
Example 4
Optimization of Polymer-Surfactant Ratio
A surfactant, SOPROPHOR 4 D 384, made by Rhodia, was first dissolved into the polymer of Example 2-5 (polymer concentration of 30 wt. %), above, at varying concentrations—2% to 5% by total volume. Next, 40 gpt of each blend was tested in HyCal II (14.2 ppg CaBr2), NoCal II (11.0-12.5 ppg NaBr), and HyCal III (19.2 ppg ZnBr2). The polymer/surfactant blend was added to the different brines and allowed to hydrate for 15 minutes at a constant shear rate of approximately 700 RPM using a standard servodyne mixer. After that, the samples were tested at 200° F. using a Chandler 5550 viscometer. From the data obtained, it was determined that the 5% surfactant concentration was optimum. The optimum concentration was also confirmed to be 5% surfactant concentration after testing with 50 gpt of polymer loading with 4 and 5% surfactant concentraion. See FIGS. 1-3.
Example 5
The 5% polymer/surfactant blend of Example 4 was then tested at various temperatures (150° F.-350° F.) at loadings of 40 gpt to 50 gpt with all three brines (HyCal II (14.2 ppg CaBr2), NoCal II (11.0-12.5 ppg NaBr), and HyCal III (19.2 ppg ZnBr2)). The polymer blend was added to the various brines and allowed to hydrate for 15 minutes. The samples were then tested at the different temperatures using a Chandler 5550 Viscometer. The resulting data for HyCal II, NoCal II and HyCal III is respectively shown in FIGS. 4, 5 and 6. From the data it was determined that the brine viscosifier is stable up to about 350° F. for 1 hour. All other temperatures showed stability for 3 hours. The data shows that good viscosities were achieved at the various temperatures for all three brines.
Although various embodiments have been shown and described, the present disclosure is not so limited and will be understood to include all such modifications and variations as would be apparent to one skilled in the art.

## Claims

1. A method comprising:
introducing into a well bore a fluid comprising a zwitterionic polymer prepared by inverse emulsion polymerization of at least one monomer Ab comprising a betaine group and optionally one or more nonionic monomers Ba, the well bore being chosen from a natural gas well bore or an oil well bore, wherein the zwitterionic polymers exhibit an intrinsic viscosity of about 600 ml/g or greater in a 20% by weight aqueous NaCl solution.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the molar ratio of the monomers Ab to the monomers Ba ranges from about 4:96 to about 40:60.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one monomer Ab is chosen from sulphobetaines or phosphobetaines.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one monomer Ab is a substituted or unsubstituted compound chosen from alkylphosphonates of dialkylammonioalkyl acrylates, alkylphosphonates of dialkylammonioalkyl methacrylates, alkylphosphonates of dialkylammonioalkyl acrylamides, alkylphosphonates of dialkylammonioalkyl methacrylamides, alkylsulphonates of dialkylammonioalkyl acrylates, alkylsulphonates of dialkylammonioalkyl methacrylates, alkylsulphonates of dialkylammonioalkyl acrylamides, alkylsulphonates of dialkylammonioalkyl methacrylamides, alkylphosphonates of dialkylammonioalkoxyalkyl acrylates, alkylphosphonates of dialkylammonioalkoxyalkyl methacrylates, alkylphosphonates of dialkylammonioalkoxyalkyl acrylamides, alkylphosphonates of dialkylammonioalkoxyalkyl methacrylamides, alkylsulphonates of dialkylammonioalkoxyalkyl acrylates, alkylsulphonates of dialkylammonioalkoxyalkyl methacrylates, alkylsulphonates of dialkylammonioalkoxyalkyl acrylamides, alkylsulphonates of dialkylammonioalkoxyalkyl methacrylamides, heterocyclic betaine monomers, alkylphosphonates of dialkylammonioalkylallylics, alkylsulphonates of dialkylammonioalkylallylics, alkylphosphonates of dialkylammonioalkylstyrenes, alkylsulphonates of dialkylammonioalkylstyrenes, or betaines resulting from ethylenically unsaturated anhydrides and dienes.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein at least one monomer Ab is a heterocyclic betaine chosen from sulphobetaines derived from piperazine, sulphobetaines derived from vinyl substituted pyridines, or sulphobetaines derived from imidazoles.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one monomer Ab is chosen from compounds of formulae 10, 11, 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 or 23:

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one monomer Ab is chosen from substituted or unsubstituted compounds of formula 24 or 25:



in which:
R1 is hydrogen or methyl,
R2 and R3, which are identical or different, are hydrogen or alkyls having from 1 to 6 carbon atoms,
Y1 is —O— or NR2,
Z− is SO3−,
m is 2 or 3, and
n is 1-6.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one monomer Ab is chosen from: sulphopropyldimethylammonioethyl methacrylate, sulphoethyldimethylammonioethyl methacrylate, sulphobutyldimethylammonioethyl methacrylate, sulphohydroxypropyldimethylammonioethyl methacrylate, sulphopropyldimethylammoniopropylacrylamide, sulphopropyldimethylammoniopropylmethacrylamide, sulphohydroxypropyldimethylammoniopropylmethacrylamide, sulphopropyldiethylammonioethoxyethyl methacrylate, 2-vinyl-1-(3-sulphopropyl)pyridinium betaine, 4-vinyl-1-(3-sulphopropyl)pyridinium betaine, sulphopropyldimethylammonioethyl acrylate, 1-vinyl-3-(3-sulphopropyl)imidazolium betaine or sulphopropylmethyldiallylammonium betaine.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one monomer Ab is chosen from compounds of formula 1, 4, 6, 7 or 8:

10. The method of claim 1, wherein during the polymerization, the monomer Ba is a hydrophilic monomer.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the zwitterionic polymer is prepared by inverse emulsion polymerization of the at least one monomer Ab and the one or more nonionic monomers Ba, wherein the one or more nonionic monomer Ba is chosen from hydroxyethyl acrylate, hydroxyethyl methacrylate, hydroxypropyl acrylate, hydroxypropyl methacrylate, glycerol monomethacrylate, acrylamide, methacrylamide, N-methylolacrylamide, dimethylacrylamide, dimethylmethacrylamide, polyethylene oxide, polypropylene oxide, polyethylene/polypropylene oxide copolymers, α-methacrylates, vinyl alcohol or vinylpyrrolidone.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the polymer is in the form of an aqueous composition comprising the inverse emulsion with an aqueous phase comprising the polymer dispersed in the form of droplets in a hydrophobic external phase and other ingredients chosen from a surfactant, an organic salt, an inorganic salt, a detergent or a thickener.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the fluid is employed simultaneously with drilling of the well bore.

14. A method comprising:
introducing into a well bore a fluid comprising a zwitterionic polymer prepared by inverse emulsion polymerization of at least one monomer Ab comprising a betaine group and one or more nonionic monomers Ba, the well bore being chosen from a natural gas well bore an 4 or an oil well bore,
wherein the at least one monomer Ab is chosen from sulphopropyldimethylammonioethyl methacrylate or sulphopropyldimethylammoniopropylmethacrylamide and the at least one nonionic monomer Ba is acrylamide.

15. A method comprising:
introducing into a well bore a fluid comprising a zwitterionic polymer prepared by inverse emulsion polymerization of at least one monomer Ab comprising a betaine group and optionally one or more nonionic monomers Ba, the well bore being chosen from a natural gas well bore or an oil well bore, wherein the inverse emulsion polymerization comprises:
preparing an inverse emulsion comprising monomer Ab and monomer Ba in an aqueous phase dispersed in the form of droplets in a hydrophobic external phase of an inverse emulsion; and
after preparing the inverse emulsion, forming the zwitterionic polymer by polymerization of the at least one monomer Ab and the one or more nonionic monomers Ba.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein preparing the inverse emulsion comprises mixing at least one emulsifying agent, monomer Ab, monomer Ba, the aqueous phase and the hydrophobic external phase.

17. The method of claim 15, wherein the polymerization is carried out by bringing together monomers Ab and monomers Ba with an initiator compound that generates free radicals.

18. The method of claim 15, wherein the polymerization is carried out at a temperature ranging from about ambient temperature to about 75° C.

19. A method comprising:
introducing into a well bore a fluid comprising a zwitterionic polymer prepared by inverse emulsion polymerization of at least one monomer Ab comprising a betaine group and optionally one or more nonionic monomers Ba, the well bore being chosen from a natural gas well bore or an oil well bore, wherein the aqueous composition is a saline composition comprising at least 25 g/l of a salt.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein the saline composition is a brine.

21. The method of claim 20, wherein the brine comprises divalent salts in an amount greater than about 25% by weight of the total salts in the brine.

22. The method of claim 20, wherein the saline composition exhibits an ionic strength of at least about 0.7 mol/l.

23. A method comprising:
introducing into a well bore a fluid comprising a zwitterionic polymer prepared by inverse emulsion polymerization of at least one monomer Ab comprising a betaine group and optionally one or more nonionic monomers Ba, the well bore being chosen from a natural gas well bore or an oil well bore, wherein the fluid is employed to fracture the well bore.

24. A method comprising:
introducing into a well bore a fluid comprising a zwitterionic polymer prepared by inverse emulsion polymerization of at least one monomer Ab comprising a betaine group and optionally one or more nonionic monomers Ba, the well bore being chosen from a natural gas well bore or an oil well bore, wherein the fluid further comprises gravel, the fluid causing the gravel to be packed in the well bore.

25. A method comprising:
introducing into a well bore a fluid comprising a zwitterionic polymer prepared by inverse emulsion polymerization of at least one monomer Ab comprising a betaine group and optionally one or more nonionic monomers Ba, the well bore being chosen from a natural gas well bore or an oil well bore, wherein the zwitterionic polymers exhibit an intrinsic viscosity of about 320 ml/g or greater in a 20% by weight aqueous NaCl solution.