alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2

 

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of May 15, 2005, by and between BRAM GOLDSMITH (“Goldsmith”), on the one hand, and CITY NATIONAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (“CNC”) and CITY NATIONAL BANK, a national banking association (“CNB”), on the other hand.

 

WHEREAS, the parties have entered into that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of May 15, 2003 (the “Existing Agreement”);

 

WHEREAS, the initial term of the Existing Agreement commenced on May 15, 2003 and terminates two years thereafter;

 

WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Existing Agreement to extend the term for an additional two years until May 15, 2007 and the Board of Directors of CNB and CNC have approved the extension of the term of the Existing Agreement for an additional two years on the same terms and conditions as the Existing Agreement;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

 

1.             All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Existing Agreement.

 

2.             Section 3 of the Existing Agreement is hereby amended by substituting for the words “commence on May 15, 2003 and terminate two (2) years thereafter” the words “commence on May 15, 2003 and terminate four (4) years thereafter.”

 

3.             Section 5 of the Existing Agreement is hereby amended by substituting for the words “fiscal years 2003 and 2004,” in the first line, the words “fiscal years 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006,”.

 

3.             Except as amended hereby, the Existing Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

 

4.             This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of California.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the date first written above.

 

	
/s/ Bram Goldsmith
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Bram Goldsmith
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
CITY NATIONAL CORPORATION
    	
CITY NATIONAL BANK
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/ Christopher Carey
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
 /s/
    	
Christopher Carey
    	
 
    
	
Name: Christopher Carey
    	
Name:
    	
Christopher Carey
    
	
Title: EVP and CFO
    	
Title:
    	
EVP and CFO
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**Certification
      of Periodic Financial Report**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of AHPC Holdings,
      Inc. (the "Company") certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment
      No. 1) of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
      information contained in that Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.




Date: 
      August 18, 2006 /s/
      Alan E.
      Zeffer


Alan E. Zeffer,


Chief Executive Officer







Date: 
      August 18, 2006 /s/
      Deborah J.
      Bills


Deborah J. Bills,


Chief Financial Officer and Secretary





This
      certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
      to
      the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
      purpose.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5239 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the credit for 

certain alternative motor vehicles assembled in the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2006 

Mr. MCHUGH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the credit for certain alternative motor vehicles assembled in the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alternative Vehicle In5 centive Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASED CREDIT AMOUNT FOR ALTERNATIVE 

7 MOTOR VEHICLES ASSEMBLED IN THE 

8 UNITED STATES. 

9 (a) INCREASED CREDIT AMOUNT.— 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5239 IH 

1 (1) NEW QUALIFIED FUEL CELL MOTOR VEHI2 CLE CREDIT.—Subsection (b) of section 30B of the 

3 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to alter4 native motor vehicle credit) is amended by inserting 

5 at the end the following new paragraph: 

6 ‘‘(4) DOMESTIC ASSEMBLY INCREASE.—The 

7 amount determined under paragraph (1) with re8 spect to a new qualified fuel cell motor vehicle which 

9 is assembled in the United States shall be increased 

10 by $5,000.’’. 

11 (2) NEW ADVANCED LEAN BURN TECHNOLOGY

12 MOTOR VEHICLE CREDIT.—Subsection (c)(2) of such 

13 section of such Code is amended by inserting at the 

14 end the following new subparagraph: 

15 ‘‘(C) DOMESTIC ASSEMBLY INCREASE.— 

16 The amount determined under this paragraph 

17 with respect to a new advanced lean burn tech18 nology motor vehicle which is assembled in the 

19 United States shall be increased by $5,000.’’. 

20 (3) NEW QUALIFIED HYBRID MOTOR VEHICLE

21 CREDIT.—Subsection (d)(2) of such section of such 

22 credit is amended by inserting at the end the fol23 lowing new subparagraph: 

24 ‘‘(C) DOMESTIC ASSEMBLY INCREASE.— 

25 The amount determined under this paragraph 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5239 IH 

1 with respect to a new qualified hybrid motor ve2 hicle which is assembled in the United States 

3 shall be increased by $5,000.’’. 

4 (4) NEW QUALIFIED ALTERNATIVE FUEL

5 MOTOR VEHICLE CREDIT.—Subsection (e) of such 

6 section of such Code is amended by inserting at the 

7 end the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(6) DOMESTIC ASSEMBLY INCREASE.—The 

9 amount determined under paragraph (1) with re10 spect to a new advanced qualified alternative fuel 

11 motor vehicle which is assembled in the United 

12 States shall be increased by $5,000.’’. 

13 (b) NO LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF NEW QUALI14 FIED HYBRID AND ADVANCED LEAN-BURN TECHNOLOGY

15 VEHICLES ELIGIBLE FOR CREDIT.—Section 30B of such 

16 Code is amended by striking subsection (f). 

17 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall take effect as if included in section 1341 

19 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Robert Hughes SPRINGLE

No. 329P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 4, 2019

Amanda S. Zimmer, Assistant Appellate Defender, For Springle, Robert Hughes

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina

Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina

Scott E. Thomas, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

*ORDER*

Defendant's alternative petition for writ of certiorari to review order of the Court of Appeals is decided as follows: The Court allows defendant's petition for the limited purpose of remanding this case to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of this Court's decision in *State v. Grady* (No. 179A14-3) (16 August 2019).

By order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of September, 2019.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Sean M. Cary, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Willamette Valley
Vineyards, Incorporated;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small
business issuer and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: April 2, 2007
    /s/ Sean M. Cary
    Sean M. Cary
    Controller
EXHIBIT
        32.3
  Written
        Statement of Principal Financial Officer Furnished Pursuant to
 18
        U.S.C.
        Section 1350,
 as
        Adopted by
 Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of HouseRaising, Inc.
        (the
        "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A.
        von
        Gnechten, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350,
        as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
        of my
        knowledge, that:
  (1)
        the
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition as of September 30, 2005 and results of operations
        for
        the quarter ended September 30, 2005 of the Company and its
        subsidiaries.
   /s/
        Richard A. von Gnechten
 Richard
        A. von Gnechten
 Chief
        Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
 
 November
        15, 2005
 
 This
        certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
        Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
     NIGHTINGALE, INC'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY 
     BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
                        
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     225
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         225
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               201,328
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 201,328
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          303,528
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   201,328
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               9,661
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               17,861
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (8,200)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (8,200)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .001
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .001
        


</TABLE>
David R. BURKE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 80243

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: December 5, 2017 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied January 30, 2018

S. Kathleen (Kate) Webber, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Julia E. Neidhardt, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Division IV: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Chief Judge, and Gary D. Witt and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judges

**Order**

Per Curiam:

Mr. David R. Burke appeals from the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 amended motion for post-conviction relief, based on ineffective assistance of counsel, after an evidentiary hearing. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Irvin G. RILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 79904

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: January 30, 2018

S. Kathleen (Kate) Webber, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Division One: Thomas H. Newton, Presiding Judge, and Karen King Mitchell and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judges

**Order**

Per Curiam:

*375Irvin Gene Riley appeals, following an evidentiary hearing, the denial of his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, in which he argued that his trial counsel (Counsel) was ineffective for (1) presenting an alibi defense; (2) describing exculpatory evidence during his opening statement that he later failed to present; and (3) failing to inform Riley of an amended, more favorable, written plea offer. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
exv10w17






EXHIBIT 10.17




DEX ONE CORPORATION




NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM



(As Modified and in Effect as of June 24, 2010)



Board Member Compensation:





	 	•	 	$125,000 annually ($50,000 cash plus $75,000 stock) (payable
immediately following election of directors at annual stockholders
meeting)





Non-Executive Chairman and Committee Chair Compensation (all amounts payable in cash
quarterly):





	 	•	 	Lead Director: $75,000 annually
	 
	 	•	 	Chair of Audit and Finance Committee: $25,000 annually
	 
	 	•	 	Chair of Compensation and Benefits Committee: $15,000 annually
	 
	 	•	 	Chair of Corporate Governance Committee: $15,000 annually





Additional Compensation (all amounts payable in cash quarterly):





	 	•	 	Meeting Fees: $2,000 per board meeting attended and $2,000
per committee meeting attended (for committee members
attending their own committee meetings only)
	 
	 	•	 	Additionally, board members will be reimbursed for
reasonable costs and expenses associated with attendance at
Board and Board committee meetings and other Dex One
business
STATE of North Carolina v. Amanda Lilly SIMMONS, Defendant.

No. COA18-1106

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 6, 2019

NO ERROR IN PART. VACATED IN PART. REMANDED.
INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS, LLC d/b/a Signature Group v. K CONSTRUCTION & ROOFING, LLC, Evangel Worship Center, Inc., and Bank of the Ozarks as successor-in-interest to Bank of the Carolinas

No. 72P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Fred W. DeVore, III, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Evangel Worship Center, Inc.

Brian J. Schoolman, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for International Property Developments, LLC.

Bryan G. Scott, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for Bank of the Ozarks.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 1st of March 2019 by Defendant (Evangel Worship Center, Inc.) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G. S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."
EXHIBIT 32.2
 Noble Corporation  Noble Corporation
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of each of Noble-Swiss and Noble-Cayman.
 May 11, 2009
    /s/ THOMAS L. MITCHELLThomas L. MitchellSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Controller
of Noble Corporation, a Swiss corporation, and Noble Corporation,a Cayman Islands company
**EXHIBIT 24**

**POWER OF ATTORNEYTO SIGN ANNUAL REPORT**

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whosesignature appears below constitutes and appoints Joseph J. Troy and Lisa A.Honnold, as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with fullpower of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her in his or her name,place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the name of such person inthe capacity indicated below opposite the name of each person to the AnnualReport for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 of Walter Industries, Inc.on Form 10-K and any and all amendments thereto and to file the samewith all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, withthe Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-factand agent, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform eachand every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about thepremises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could doin person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact andagent, or his or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or causeto be done by virtue hereof.

ThisPower of Attorney has been signed this 27th day of February, 2007.
|        |   | /s/ Howard L. Clark, Jr. |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Director                      |   |
|   |   |                          |
|   |   | /s/ Jerry W. Kolb             |   |
|   |   | Director                      |   |
|   |   |                          |
|   |   | /s/ Patrick A. Kriegshauser   |   |
|   |   | Director                      |   |
|   |   |                          |
|   |   | /s/ Joseph B. Leonard         |   |
|   |   | Director                      |   |
|   |   |                          |
|   |   | /s/ Mark J. O’Brien      |   |
|   |   | Director                      |   |
|   |   |                          |
|   |   | /s/ Bernard G. Rethore        |   |
|   |   | Director                      |   |
|   |   |                          |
|   |   | /s/ George R. Richmond        |   |
|   |   | Director                      |   |
|   |   |                          |
|   |   | /s/ Michael T. Tokarz         |   |
|   |   | Chairman                      |   |
|        |        |                               |        |  |

 

----