alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5396 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to employ additional categories of mental health professionals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2006 

Mr. MORAN of Kansas (for himself and Mr. MICHAUD) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to employ additional categories of mental health professionals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Mental 

5 Health Care Access Improvement Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF7 FAIRS TO EMPLOY ADDITIONAL CATEGORIES 

8 OF MENTAL HEALTH PROVIDERS. 

9 Section 7402(b) of title 38, United States Code, is 

10 amended— 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5396 IH

1 (1) by redesignating paragraph (10) as para2 graph (12); and 

3 (2) by inserting after paragraph (9) the fol4 lowing new paragraphs: 

5 ‘‘(10) MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPIST.—To be 

6 eligible to be appointed to a licensed mental health coun7 selor position, a person must— 

8 ‘‘(A) hold a master’s degree in marriage and 

9 family therapy, or a comparable degree in mental 

10 health, from a college or university approved by the 

11 Secretary; and 

12 ‘‘(B) be licensed or certified to independently 

13 practice marriage and family therapy in a State, ex14 cept that the Secretary may waive the requirement 

15 of licensure or certification for an individual mar16 riage and family therapist for a reasonable period of 

17 time recommended by the Under Secretary for 

18 Health. 

19 ‘‘(11) LICENSED MENTAL HEALTH COUNSELOR.— 

20 To be eligible to be appointed to a position as a licensed 

21 mental health counselor, a person must— 

22 ‘‘(A) hold a master’s degree in mental health 

23 counseling, or a related field, from a college or uni24 versity approved by the Secretary; and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5396 IH

1 ‘‘(B) be licensed or certified to independently 

2 practice mental health counseling in a State, except 

3 that the Secretary may waive the requirement of li4 censure or certification for an individual licensed 

5 mental health counselor for a reasonable period of 

6 time recommended by the Under Secretary for 

7 Health.’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
TOUiti)M.o\UTHORITY 

May 20,2015 

To the U.S. Department of Transportation 

Regarding: DOS-2015-0082 

On behalf of the San Diego Tourism Authority, I write to you in support of the Open 

Skies agreements as they assist the efforts to increase the number of international 

travelers to the United States. We have worked hard to appeal to not only the domestic 

travelers, but also to those traveling from international destinations. This growth will 

continue to be possible if international travelers find it easy and affordable to come to 

the U.S. 

We support the Open Skies agreements and urge you to preserve all existing Open Skies 

agreements and vigorously work to expand this successful policy. These agreements 

have helped to increase the number of flights to the United States, leading to access to 

new and growing markets and lower fares. The competition is good for those traveling 

as well as the entire U.S. economy. 

Open Skies will continue to help our leisure travel and meetings and convention 

business grow. Too often, America loses out to other international destinations for 

global events. The Open Skies agreements will help us to grow the market for 

international travel of all types. 

We compete aggressively with other destinations across the country and around the 

world. We believe that more competition in regards to the travel industry is good for 

consumers and good for the growth of our industry. That same spirit applies to 

competition in international aviation as well. 

I thank you for your consideration and hope you too will help to keep the Open Skies 

agreements in place to help keep our international visitation strong throughout the 

United States. 

Best regards, 

~ Joe Terzi 

President & CEO 

750 8 Street 

Suite 1500 

San Diego/CA 92101 

TEL 619.232.3101 SANOIEGO. RG 

FAX 619.696.9371
No. 09-7892.

#### Sammie D. Kinnard, Petitioner v. Metropolitan Police Department, et al.

559 U.S. 1117, 130 S. Ct. 2430,

176 L. Ed. 2d 943,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3766.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 945, 130 S. Ct. 1514, 176 L. Ed. 2d 123, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 1268.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and the Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Operations, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          32,797
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,984
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,683
<INVENTORY>                                    108,132
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               239,933
<PP&E>                                         205,687
<DEPRECIATION>                                  94,647
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 681,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          116,454
<BONDS>                                        556,092
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,875
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   (130,281)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   681,885
<SALES>                                        601,567
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               601,567
<CGS>                                          375,745
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  588,175
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              63,340
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,410)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,415)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (51,825)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,806)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (55,690)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Ontrel Latre GILCHRIST

No. 266P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019.

Jarvis John Edgerton, IV, Attorney at Law, For Gilchrist, Ontrel Latre

Willliam P. Hart, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina

Mary Louise Lucasse, Special Deputy Attorney General

Ontrel Gilchrist, For Gilchrist, Ontrel Latre

Maureen Krueger, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th of July 2019 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
No. 09-10144.

#### Richard C. Anamanya, Petitioner v. United States.

560 U.S. 916, 130 S. Ct. 3303,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1204,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4028.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 988 A.2d 509.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5416 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5416

 To provide for grants to conduct research toward the development of a 
                     vaccine against Valley Fever.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 2006

  Mr. Thomas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for grants to conduct research toward the development of a 
                     vaccine against Valley Fever.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Valley Fever Vaccine Development 
Act''.

SEC. 2. GRANTS FOR RESEARCH ON VACCINE AGAINST VALLEY FEVER.

    (a) In General.--In supporting research on the development of 
vaccines against human diseases, the Secretary of Health and Human 
Services, acting through the Director of the Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention, shall make grants for the purpose of conducting 
research toward the development of a vaccine against coccidioidomycosis 
(commonly known as Valley Fever).
    (b) Sunset.--No grant may be made under subsection (a) on or after 
October 1, 2012. The preceding sentence does not have any legal effect 
on payments under grants for which amounts appropriated under 
subsection (c) were obligated prior to such date.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--For the purpose of making 
grants under subsection (a), there are authorized to be appropriated 
such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 2007 through 
2012.
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00066-CR

EX PARTE Patricia Foster SKELTON

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Real County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-2993-DC

Honorable Camile G. Dubose, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the appellant’s motion for rehearing is 

GRANTED and the habeas court’s order of December 11, 2011, denying habeas relief is 

REVERSED. We GRANT HABEAS RELIEF and VACATE the judgment in cause number 2004-

0934-DR from the 38th Judicial District Court of Real County, Texas.

SIGNED May 28, 2014.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Order entered March 9 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 01037

- CR

GARY ANTHONY SANDERS , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Co urt Cause No. F13

- 58529

- H



### O RDER

The Court REINSTATE S the appeal.

On January 20, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the

reporter’s record had not been filed. On March 6, 2015, we received the reporter’s record.

Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the January 20, 2015 order

requiring findings.

Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
STATE v. Frederick Lynn INGRAM

203P19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 4, 2019

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, James R. Woodall, Jr., District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Frederick L. Ingram, for Ingram, Frederick L.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd of June 2019 by Defendant for Petition for Appeal:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of June 2019."
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted August 23, 2012

Decided August 28, 2012

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

No. 12

‐ 2286

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellee

,

v.

CHARLES T. McINTOSH,

Defendant

‐ Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

No. 1:07

‐ cr

‐ 00073

‐ WCG

‐ 1

William C. Griesbach,

Judge.

O R D E R

We have considered the Anders brief submitted by the attorney for the defendant

‐ appellant, Charles T. McIntosh. The brief is sufficient on its face and we agree that there are

no non

‐ frivolous grounds for appeal. The motion to withdraw is granted and the appeal is

dismissed. NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
**Exhibit      15.1**

**RSM      Richter LLP**

|   | **RSM Richter LLP Comptables agréés**         |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | **Chartered Accountants**                                              |
|   | 2, Place Alexis Nihon                                        |
|   | Montréal (Québec) H3Z 3C2                          |
|   | Téléphone / Telephone : (514) 934-3400   |
|   | Télécopieur / Facsimile : (514) 934-3408 |
|   | www.rsmrichter.com                                                          |

**CONSENT      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

**Chartered      Accountants**

Montreal,      Canada

----
posam_amend1feb11exh4-3.htm


EXHIBIT 4.3


 


 


 


 


EXHIBIT A


 


STATE BANCORP, INC.


AMENDMENT NO. 2 (EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 17, 2011) TO THE


AMENDED AND RESTATED


DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT AND STOCK PURCHASE PLAN NO. 2







Whereas, State Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan on May 23, 2000, amended and restated such plan on July 29, 2008 (the “Amended and Restated Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan No. 2”) and amended the Amended and Restated Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan No. 2 on January 27, 2009 (collectively, the “Plan”); and







Whereas, Section 15 of the Plan provides that the Company shall have complete authority to, among other things, amend the Plan; and







Whereas, the Company wishes to amend the Plan to modify the determination of the minimum price at which the Company may sell shares of its Common Stock under the Plan.







Now, Therefore, Section 8.02(b) of the Plan shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows:







“The purchase price to each Participant of Common Stock purchased from the Company shall not be less than the greater of (i) eighty-five (85%) of the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the last business day of the calendar quarter or any subsequent month immediately preceding the Investment Date involved or (ii) the par value of the Common Stock.  The purchase price per share allocated to each Participant of Common Stock purchased on the open market shall normally be the weighted average purchase price of all Common Stock so purchased under the Plan each quarter.”







In Witness Whereof, this Amendment has been executed by the undersigned officer of State Bancorp, Inc. pursuant to authority given by the Board of Directors.












State Bancorp, Inc.

















By: /s/ Patricia M. Schaubeck


Name: Patricia M. Schaubeck


Title:   General Counsel
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5330 

To provide coverage under the Railway Labor Act to employees of certain 

air and surface transportation entities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2006 

Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To provide coverage under the Railway Labor Act to 

employees of certain air and surface transportation entities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Express Carrier Em5 ployee Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE RAILWAY LABOR ACT. 

7 Section 201 of the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 

8 181) is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘All’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) IN

10 GENERAL.—All’’; 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5330 IH

1 (2) by inserting ‘‘and every express carrier’’ 

2 after ‘‘common carrier by air’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(b) EXPRESS CARRIERS.—The employees of an ex5 press carrier shall be covered by this Act only if they are 

6 licensed airmen, licensed aircraft maintenance technicians, 

7 or licensed aircraft dispatchers, and only if they perform 

8 duties for the express carrier pursuant to the privileges 

9 of the appropriate license. All other employees of an ex10 press carrier shall be covered by the provisions of the Na11 tional Labor Relations Act. 

12 ‘‘(c) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘express 

13 carrier’ means any company (or companies affiliated 

14 through common control or ownership) that has an inte15 grated network of air and surface transportation for the 

16 purpose of the express shipment of packages.’’. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Standard Companies Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, G. Peter DAloia, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ G. Peter DAloia                             
|G. Peter DAloia                                 
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

February 26, 2007
STATE of North Carolina v. Keith Lavoris HALL

No. 14P09-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Locke Bell, District Attorney, For State of NC.

Dylan J.C. Buffum, Attorney at Law, For Hall, Keith Lavoris.

***ORDER***

*712Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 10th of July 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."
IN RE Bertram TURNER and Regulatory Licensing & Compliance, LLC, Relators

NO. 14-16-00967-CV

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.).

Opinion filed January 5, 2017

Vicki Gajtanovski, for Real party in interest Gajtanovski, Vicki.

John W. Belk, Houston, for Real party in interest Jay VMK, Corp, John L. Kelly, Vassie M. Kelly.

David L. Bergen Jr., Charles M.R. Vethan, Houston, Joseph L. Lanza, San Antonio, for Relator.

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Wise.

PER CURIAM

On December 2, 2016, relators Bertram Turner and Regulatory Licensing & Compliance, LLC filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. *See*Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004) ; *see also* Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this Court to compel the Honorable Alexandra Smoots-Hogan, presiding judge of the 164th District Court of Harris County, to set aside her November 16, 2016 order denying their motion to disqualify counsel for real parties in interest.

Relators have not shown that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators' petition for writ of mandamus.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5224 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5224

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 350 Uinta Drive in Green River, Wyoming, as the ``Curt Gowdy Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2006

  Mrs. Cubin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 350 Uinta Drive in Green River, Wyoming, as the ``Curt Gowdy Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CURT GOWDY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 350 Uinta Drive in Green River, Wyoming, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Curt Gowdy Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Curt Gowdy 
Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 09-737.

#### Michelle Ortiz, Petitioner v. Paula Jordan, et al.

559 U.S. 1092, 130 S. Ct. 2371,

176 L. Ed. 2d 767,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3524.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted.

Same case below, 316 Fed. Appx. 449.
No. 09-8198.

#### In re Alfredo Masis Sancho, Petitioner.

559 U.S. 1089, 130 S. Ct. 2145,

176 L. Ed. 2d 762,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3257.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 935, 130 S. Ct. 1535, 176 L. Ed. 2d 153, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 1090.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 21

- 3280

_____________________________ C HARLES U RIAH W ELLS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County

. Timothy Register , Judge

. September 6, 2022

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R AY , W INOKUR , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Charles Uriah Wells, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.