alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                          57,724
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,081,031
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,684,501
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,317,366
<PP&E>                                       1,575,199
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,538,543
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,827,574
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           356
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,538,543
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,355,868
<CGS>                                       11,564,466
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (87,458)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (340,864)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (323,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (115,842)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (207,158)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Sean M. Cary, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the annual
period ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc.

Date: April 14, 2005
By:    /s/
Name: Sean M. Cary
Title:   Controller
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 25, 2015 

# Order

Clerk March 25, 2015

148927

MATTHEW HELTON,

Plaintiff

- Appella nt,

SC: 148927

v COA: 314857

Oakland CC Family Division:

2012

- 798218

- DP

LISA MARIE BEAMAN and DOUGLAS

BEAMAN,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

By order of the Chief Justice, the defendants

- appellees, having failed to file a brief

on appeal in contravention of the order granting leave to appeal and MCR 7.309(B)(2) for

the stat ed reason that counsel, who appeared on their behalf in the Court of Appeals, was

not compensated to represent them in this Court , forfe it the right to oral argument when

the case is heard at the April 2015 session of the Court . MCR 7.309(B)(3). In light of

that forfeiture, the time allotted to plaintiff

- appellant for oral argument shall be limited to

fifteen minutes. MCR 7.315(B).
STATE of North Carolina v. Jesse James TUCKER

No. 330A19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 9, 2019

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, for Tucker, Jesse James.

Sonya M. Calloway-Durham, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Heidi E. Reiner, Assistant Appellate Defender.

Brandy Cook, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 22nd of August 2019 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of September 2019."
WebFilings | EDGAR view


 




EXHIBIT 10.21
 
SUMMARY OF KEY TERMS OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS
 WITH MIDAMERICAN ENERGY HOLDINGS COMPANY
 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
 
MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company's ("MEHC") continuing named executive officers each receive an annual salary and participate in health insurance and other benefit plans on the same basis as other employees, as well as certain other compensation and benefit plans described in MEHC's Annual Report on Form 10-K. 
 
The named executive officers are also eligible to receive a cash incentive award under MEHC's Performance Incentive Plan ("PIP"). The PIP provides for a discretionary annual cash award that is determined on a subjective basis and paid in December. In addition to the PIP, the named executive officers are eligible to receive discretionary cash performance awards periodically during the year to reward the accomplishment of significant non-recurring tasks or projects. Messrs. David L. Sokol and Gregory E. Abel have not been granted discretionary cash performance awards in the past five years. Messrs. Patrick J. Goodman and Douglas L. Anderson and Ms. Maureen E. Sammon are participants in MEHC's Long-Term Incentive Partnership Plan ("LTIP"). Messrs. Sokol and Abel do not participate in the LTIP. A copy of the LTIP is attached as Exhibit 10.11 to the MEHC Annual Report on Form 10-K. Messrs. Sokol and Abel are participants in MEHC's Incremental Profit Sharing Plan ("IPSP"). Messrs. Goodman and Anderson and Ms. Sammon do not participate in the IPSP. A copy of Mr. Sokol's IPSP and Mr. Abel's IPSP are attached as Exhibits 10.2 and 10.4, respectively, to the MEHC Annual Report on Form 10-K. 
 
Base salary for continuing named executive officers for MEHC's fiscal year ending December 31, 2011, is shown in the following table:
 
				
	Name and Title
	Base Salary

	David L. Sokol
Chairman of the Board
	$
	750,000
	 

	Gregory E. Abel
President and Chief Executive Officer
	$
	1,000,000
	 

	Patrick J. Goodman
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	$
	360,000
	 

	Douglas L. Anderson
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
	$
	310,000
	 

	Maureen E. Sammon
Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer
	$
	226,000
	 




 
Messrs. Sokol and Abel are directors of MEHC, but do not receive additional compensation for their service as directors other than what they receive as employees of MEHC. The other members of the MEHC board of directors do not receive compensation for their service as directors.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17

- 0047 V

Filed: April 12, 2018

UNPUBLISHED

ANGELA TURNER

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU) ; Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Causation

- In

- Fact; Influenza (Flu)
Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Joseph Alexander Vuckovich, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Washington, DC , for
petitioner. Jennifer Leigh Reynaud, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On January 12, 2017

, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left shoulder injury as a result of an influenza vaccination received on October 15, 2015 . Petit ion at 1

. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On April 12, 2018

, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, respondent “ has determined that petitioner ’ s alleged injury is consistent with a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ( “ SIRVA ” ) that was

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance wi th

the E

- Government Act of 2002

. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for

e ase of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).caused by the administration of petitioner ’s flu vaccination. ” Id. at 3 . Respondent further agrees that “ petitioner has sati sfied all legal prerequisites for compensation

under the Vaccine Act .” Id.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned find s that petitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
No. 09-957.

#### Charles Patton, Petitioner v. Illinois.

559 U.S. 1048, 130 S. Ct. 2350,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2997.

176 L. Ed. 2d 562,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 391 Ill. App. 3d 1121, 367 Ill. Dec. 839, 982 N.E.2d 989.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND , TEXAS JUDGMENT

In the interest of J.L.C.
, a child, * From the County Court at Law Brown County, Trial Court No. 00

- 01

- 005

.

No. 11

- 13

- 00252

- CV * August 29, 2014

* Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J

. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )
This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that t here is
no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion,
the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Jimmy Ray Coffee and Carla Jeane Coffee.
STATE of North Carolina, v. Ivan Jonathan PRUDENTE-ANORVE, Defendant.

No. COA18-827

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 6, 2019

NO ERROR IN PART. REMANDED IN PART.
No. 09-8426.

#### Keith Russell Judd, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1089, 130 S. Ct. 2146,

176 L. Ed. 2d 763,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3232.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 981, 130 S. Ct. 1708, 176 L. Ed. 2d 196, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 2131.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Optigenex Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
McSherry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Optigenex Inc. and will be retained by Optigenex Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                    /s/ JOSEPH MCSHERRY
                                    -----------------------
                                    Joseph McSherry
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    November 21, 2005
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4438

_____________________________ S EMINOLE C OUNTY , Appellant,

v.

F LORIDA P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION , U TILITIES , I NC

. OF F LORIDA , O FFICE OF P UBLIC C OUNSEL , and A NN M ARIE R YAN and S UMMERTREE W ATER A LLIANCE , Appellee s

.

_____________________________

On appeal from Public Service Commission

. March 13, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
M AKAR , O STERHAUS , and J AY , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

William S. Bilenky and Douglas P. Manson of Manson Bolves Donaldson Varn, P.A., Tampa
, for Appellant.

Kathryn G.W. Cowdery, Senior Attorney, Keith C. Hetrick, General Counsel, and Samantha M. Cibula, Attorney Supervisor, Florida Public Service Commission, Tallahassee
, for Appellee s

.
No. 09-8892.

#### In re Salvatore M. Bombardiere, Sr., Petitioner.

559 U.S. 1004, 130 S. Ct. 1908,

176 L. Ed. 2d 405,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2431.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
No. 09-861.

#### Citizens for Police Accountability Political Committee, Petitioner v. Kurt S. Browning, Florida Secretary of State, et al.

559 U.S. 1086, 130 S. Ct. 2141,

176 L. Ed. 2d 756,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3204.

April 19, 2010.

Motion of Marion B. Brechner First Amendment Project, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 572 F.3d 1213.
WINSTON AFFORDABLE HOUSING, L.L.C., d/b/a Winston Summit Apartments, Plaintiff, v. Deborah ROBERTS, Defendant.

No. COA18-553

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 18, 2019

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Kris
G. Radhakrishnan, Chief Financial Officer of ACC Group Holding Corp. and
American Achievement Corporation (the “Companies”), hereby certify
that:





(1) The
Quarterly Report of the Companies on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February
28, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.





Date:
April 14, 2009





/s/
      KRIS G. RADHAKRISHNANName:
            
            Kris
      G. RadhakrishnanTitle:
            
            Chief
      Financial Officer(principal
      financial officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [LLAZ9120000 L12200000 AL0000 6100.241A0] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Arizona Resource Advisory Council Meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Arizona Resource Advisory Council (RAC), will meet on March 26, 2009, at the BLM National Training Center located at 9828 North 31st Avenue in Phoenix from 8 a.m. until 4:30 p.m. Morning agenda items include: Review and approval of the September 18, 2008, meeting minutes for RAC and Recreation Resource Advisory Council (RRAC) business; BLM State Director's update on statewide issues; Update on Solar Energy Rights-of-Way Applications; Presentation on the Healthy Lands Initiative Projects and Wild Horse and Burro Program in Arizona; RAC questions on BLM Field Managers' Rangeland Resource Team proposals; and reports by RAC working groups. A public comment period will be provided at 11:30 a.m. on March 26, 2009, for any interested publics who wish to address the Council on BLM programs and business. 

Under the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act, the RAC has been designated as the RRAC, and has the authority to review all BLM and Forest Service (FS) recreation fee proposals in Arizona. The afternoon meeting agenda on March 26, will include a presentation on the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act requirements, a review and discussion of the Recreation Enhancement Act (REA) Working Group Report, future BLM/FS recreation fee proposals and REA Working Group meeting schedule. 

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         March 26, 2009.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Deborah Stevens, Bureau of Land Management, Arizona State Office, One North Central Avenue, Suite 800, Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4427, 602-417-9504. 

Helen Hankins, 

Acting Arizona State Director.

 [FR Doc. E9-4212 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-32-P
STATE v. Joseph Donald CARROLL

179P19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 19, 2019

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Garry W. Frank, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Joseph Donald Carroll, for Carroll, Joseph Donald.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th of May 2019 by Defendant for Appropriate Relief:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."
ODNIHeader2




Print
  The U.S. intelligence budget has two major components: the National Intelligence Program and the Military Intelligence Program. The National Intelligence Program includes all programs, projects and activities of the intelligence community as well as any other intelligence community programs designated jointly by the DNI and the head of department or agency, or the DNI and the President.   The MIP is devoted to intelligence activity conducted by the military departments and agencies in the Department of Defense that support tactical U.S. military operations. In addition, other departments and agencies may engage in certain activities related to intelligence for their own mission needs that are not captured here. U.S. INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY BUDGETFiscalYearNIP Budget RequestedNIP Budget AppropriatedMIP Budget RequestedMIP Budget AppropriatedTotal Appropriated2025
$73.4

$28.22024
$72.4

$29.32023
$67.1
$71.7
$26.6
$27.9
$99.62022
$62.3
$65.7
$23.3
$24.1
$89.82021
$61.9
$60.8
$23.1
$23.3
$84.12020
$62.8
$62.7
$23.0
$23.1
$85.82019
$59.9
$60.2
$21.2
$21.5
$81.72018
$57.7
$59.4
$20.7
$22.1
$81.52017
$54.9
$54.6
$18.5
$18.4
$73.02016
$53.9
$53.0
$17.9
$17.7
$70.72015
$50.4
$50.3
$16.6
$16.5
$66.82014
$52.2
$50.5
$14.6
$17.4
$67.92013
$52.6
$49.0
$19.2
$18.6
$67.62012
$55.0
$53.9
---
$21.5
$75.42011
---
$54.6
---
$24.0
$78.62010
---
$53.1
---
$27.0
$80.12009
---
$49.8
---
$26.4
$76.22008
---
$47.5
---
$22.9
$70.42007
---
$43.5
---
$20.0
$63.52006
---
$40.9
---
---
---All figures are in billions of US dollars **FOOTNOTES** 1. The aggregate amount appropriated to the NIP for Fiscal Year 2013 was $52.7 billion, which was reduced by sequestration to $49.0 billion.2. The aggregate amount appropriated to the MIP for Fiscal Year 2013 was $19.2 billion, which was reduced by sequestration to $18.6 billion.3. Prior to 2007 there was no statutory requirement to publish the NIP appropriated topline figure.  **Disclosure of Appropriated Funds** One of the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission was for the Intelligence Community to declassify its budget.  This recommendation was enacted in 2007 by section 601 of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act (Public Law 110-53).  This law established the requirement for the Director of National Intelligence to disclose the "aggregate amount of funds appropriated by Congress” for the NIP within 30 days of the end of the fiscal year. **Disclosure of Requested Funds** The National Intelligence Program budget request was first publicly disclosed in February 2011, pursuant to a requirement enacted by Congress in Section 364 of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010. The Military Intelligence Program budget request was first released in February 2012.
Exhibit
      32 .1





Certification
      Pursuant to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Imagenetix, Inc., a Nevada corporation
      (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:





To
      my
      knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
      March 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:
              June 28, 2007
            By:
            /s/
              WILLIAM
              P. SPENCERWilliam
              P. SpencerChief
                Executive Officer and President
David Ezell SIMPSON v. Sheriff MCFADDEN State of North Carolina

No. 194P19-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2019

David Ezell Simpson, for Simpson, David Ezell.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 10th of June 2019 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County:

"Dismissed without prejudice by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."