alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**SECTION 302CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Jeffrey A. Wahba, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewedthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of HireRight, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;

 

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant andwe have:

 

(a)           designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;

 

(b)           evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           disclosed in thisQuarterly Report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

(a)           all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)           anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date:  August 7, 2008 | By:      | /s/  Jeffrey A. Wahba     |
|----------------------------|----------|---------------------------|
|                       |     | Jeffrey  A. Wahba,        |
| * *                   | * * | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8, No. 333-46629) pertaining to the Employee Stock Plans,
collectively, of Granite Broadcasting Corporation, of our report dated
February 20, 2002 (except for Note 17, as to which the date is April 30,
2002), with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Granite Broadcasting Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A)
for the year ended December 31, 2001.

New York, New York
May 7, 2002
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Robinson Helicopter Company, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 4

- 00 407

- CV

Trial court case number: 2013

- 2 9873

Trial court: 1 29th District Court of Harris County

On May 19 , 201 4

, relator

, Robinson Helicopter Company, Inc. , filed a petition for a writ

of mandamus

. The Court requests a response to the petition for writ of mandamus from real part y in interest, Paula Yeager , Individually

, as Heir at Law and as Representative of the Estate of Christopher Yeager, Deceased. The response, if any, is due no later than Monday, July 14,

2014.

The trial court’s March 24, 2014 order in cause number 2013

- 2 9 87 3, requiring relator to “provide documents reflecting its current net worth in response to Plaintiff’s Request for

Production No. 22” is stayed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.10. The stay is effective until disposition of relator’s petition for writ of mandamus or further order of this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jim Sharp

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 3, 2014
STATE of North Carolina v. Orlando COOPER

No. 90P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 4, 2019

Nicholas C. Woomer-Deters, Assistant Appellate Defender, For Cooper, Orlando

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina

Sonya M. Galloway-Durham, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina

Seth H. Edwards, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

*ORDER*

The State's petition for discretionary review is decided as follows: The Court allows the State's petition for the limited purpose of remanding this case to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of this Court's decision in State v. Grady (No. 179A14-3) (16 August 2019), including determining what, if any, additional proceedings should be utilized in order to properly decide the questions that will be before it on remand.

By order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of September, 2019.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 42


### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 05/29 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 29 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
Rt>conl · 1 Discussion 

Docket No. FA/\-2013-0672 o :(ec! r.1tc Identifier: 20 I ~-NM-058-/\D 

With whom outside the FAA has this action ht·• , d-isnasst;d (i.c.~D~sign Approv~l Holder, ~ 

manufacture•·, ATA, NBAA, RAA -:__~_9PA._: i \:_s; ~M~, etc)'? _________ _j 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CON'l +------- "/\( n -.1! I - --------D-A-.1,..--, _E__ ___ lC5PiCSmscLI SSED ---~-~~--~~~~ 

---- .L_ _______________________________ _ 

.. - t-------------- --------- --- ------1 

------ - ---------1------- -----

--

--- -----------------------------------; 

1----------------r------ -------

---·· 

-------

Other/Additional Information: This .supplcment<1 NPRM is being revised due to public comments 

as dispositionecl within this SNPRM. no addi• i •.nl coordination has taken place since 

development of the original NPIUvl.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 135477(64) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 135477 COA: 271808 Genesee CC: 06-017719-FH ODRECUS RYZAN CLEMENTS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s March 24, 2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

d0519 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2008

Clerk
STATE v. Cedric Theodis HOBBS, Jr.

263PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

John Keating Wiles, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

Amy Kunstling Irene, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Sterling P. Rozear, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Hobbs, Cedric Theodis (Jr.)

Cedric Theodis Hobbs, Jr., for Hobbs, Cedric Theodis (Jr.)

Donald H. Beskind, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality.

David Weiss, Attorney at Law, for Coalition of State and National Criminal Justice and Civil Rights Advocates.

James E. Coleman, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Coalition of State and National Criminal Justice and Civil Rights Advocates.

Elizabeth Hambourger, Attorney at Law, Durham, for Coalition of State and National Criminal Justice and Civil Rights Advocates.

Robert S. Chang, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality.

Taki V. Flevaris, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality.

William R. West, District Attorney, for the State of North Carolina.

*822The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of June 2019 by Defendant to Supplement Record on Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
Print
  WELCOME TO GLOBAL TRENDS 2040 Welcome to the 7th edition of the National Intelligence Council’s Global Trends report. Published every four years since 1997, Global Trends assesses the key trends and uncertainties that will shape the strategic environment for the United States during the next two decades. Global Trends is designed to provide an analytic framework for policymakers early in each administration as they craft national security strategy and navigate an uncertain future. The goal is not to offer a specific prediction of the world in 2040; instead, our intent is to help policymakers and citizens see what may lie beyond the horizon and prepare for an array of possible futures. Read more...
  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This edition of Global Trends constructs its analysis of the future in several stages. First, we examine structural forces in demographics, environment, economics, and technology that shape the contours of our future world. Second, we analyze how these structural forces and other factors—combined with human responses—affect emerging dynamics in societies, states, and the international system. Third, we envision five plausible scenarios for the distant future in 2040. The key themes discussed above appear across these sections. Read more...
  THE COVID FACTOR: EXPANDING UNCERTAINTY
 The COVID-19 pandemic emerged globally in 2020, wreaking havoc across the world, killing more than 2.5 million people as of early 2021, devastating families and communities, and disrupting economies and political dynamics within and between countries. Previous Global Trends editions forecasted the potential for new diseases and even imagined scenarios with a pandemic, but we lacked a full picture of the breadth and depth of its disruptive potential. COVID-19 has shaken long-held assumptions about resilience and adaptation and created new uncertainties about the economy, governance, geopolitics, and technology. Read more...
 STRUCTURAL FORCES
   Demographics & Human Developmentlaunch this link
 Environmentlaunch this link
 Economicslaunch this link
 Technologylaunch this link
  EMERGING DYNAMICS
   Societal: Disillusioned, Informed, and Dividedlaunch this link
 State: Tensions, Turbulence, and Transformationlaunch this link
 International: More Contested, Uncertain, and Conflict Pronelaunch this link
  STRATEGIC FUTURES GROUP ON THE SCENARIOS FOR 2040  In the latest edition of the Global Trends report, the National Intelligence Council detailed five potential scenarios for how the world will look in 20 years. Learn more about the report from the Director of the NIC’s Strategic Futures Group, Maria Langan-Riekhof. Read more... | More videos from ODNI...
  SCENARIOS FOR 2040
 Renaissance of Democracies
 A World Adrift
 Competitive Coexistence
 Separate Silos
 Tragedy and Mobilization
  REGIONAL FORECASTS Latin America
 Europe
 Russia & Eurasia
 Middle East & North Africa
 Sub-Saharan Africa
 South Asia
 North East Asia
 South East Asia
 Oceania
Bryian FIPS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. ED 105215

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: February 6, 2018

Stephen P. Ranz, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Movant/Appellant.

Christine K. Lesicko, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent/Respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Bryian Fips appeals from the motion court's order denying his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.0351 after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2015.
No. 09-9810.

#### James Huber, aka James Hubert, aka James Jay Huber, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1100, 130 S. Ct. 2391,

176 L. Ed. 2d 781,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3665.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 322 Fed. Appx. 608.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**WrittenStatement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

 

The undersigned, theChief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Regal EntertainmentGroup, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), each hereby certifies that, tohis/her knowledge on the date hereof:

 

(a)                                  the Form 10-Q of the Company for thesecond quarter ended June 26, 2008, filed on the date hereof with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(b)                                 the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ MICHAEL L. CAMPBELL |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Michael L. Campbell     |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | August 5, 2008     |
|   |                    |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/ AMY E. MILES        |
|   | Amy E. Miles            |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | August 5, 2008     |

 

1

----
#### In the Matter of Carlton E. Rouse, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

[773 NYS2d 302]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Braun, J.), entered March 21, 2003, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondents’ determination denying petitioner’s request to retake a civil service examination, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

No issues of fact exist as to whether petitioner complained about the lighting in the examination room on the day he took the examination, and, even if he did, that the alleged excessive glare caused him a disadvantage *(see Matter of Lawson v Levitt,*211 AD2d 587 [1995]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of AGU Entertainment, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
C. Levy, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ David C. Levy
                                        -----------------
                                        David C. Levy
                                        Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 3, 2013

d0826 

# Order

Clerk September 3, 2013

147064

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147064

COA: 309460

Wayne CC: 11

- 000769

- FC

KEITH LAMAR HENDERSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 26, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it i s DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 31.1
 
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: August 14, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Nigel JamesNigel JamesPresident and Principal Executive Officer E-2
Abatement Order filed August 21, 2014

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00931-CV

____________

ALBERT MORRIS AND TILDA MORRIS, Appellants

V.

AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING AND WELLS FARGO 

TRUSTEE, Appellees

On Appeal from the 400th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-DCV-197669

ABATEMENT ORDER

Notice was filed on August 18, 2014 that appellant Albert Morris is in 

bankruptcy. Tex. R. App. P. 8.1. According to court records, on July 9, 2012, 

Albert Morris, petitioned for voluntary bankruptcy protection in the United States 

Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas under case number 12-35217. 

A bankruptcy suspends the appeal from the date when the bankruptcy petition is 
filed until the appellate court reinstates the appeal in accordance with federal law. 

Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal abated.

When a case has been suspended by a bankruptcy filing, a party may move 

the appellate court to reinstate the appeal if permitted by federal law or the 

bankruptcy court. Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. If the bankruptcy court has lifted or 

terminated the stay, a certified copy of the order must be attached to the motion. Id. 

A party filing a motion to reinstate shall specify what further action, if any, is 

required from this court when the appeal is reinstated. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(a).

For administrative purposes only, and without surrendering jurisdiction, the 

appeal is abated and treated as a closed case until further order of this court.

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: October 14, 2008
    /s/ Crit S. DeMentName:
    Crit S. DeMentTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF BEHRE DOLBEAR &COMPANY (USA)**

 

Asindependent geological consultants, we hereby consent to the use of our report(and to all references to our firm, including being named as experts) in theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Uranium Resources, Inc. for the yearended December 31, 2009 and to the incorporation by reference of suchreport in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-151134)and on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-156433 and 333-119661) ofUranium Resources, Inc.

 
| BEHRE  DOLBEAR & COMPANY (USA) |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                    |   |
| Denver, Colorado                        |   |
| March 16, 2010                     |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, James W. Bernau, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended December 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.














Date: April 1, 2013


By: /s/ James W. Bernau


Name: James W. Bernau


Title:   Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. and will be retained by Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. specifically incorporates it by reference.