alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BROWN v. WENDOVER PLAZA LLC, et al.

53P19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Terry L. Brown, for Brown, Terry L.

Julie L. Bell, Attorney at Law, Winston Salem, for Wendover Plaza LLC, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th of February 2019 by Defendant to Dismiss Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3013809-DEC-201009:18 AM
Exhibit
      32 .2








Certification
      Pursuant to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Imagenetix, Inc., a Nevada corporation
      (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:





To
      my
      knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
      March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      June 28, 2006 /s/LOWELL W. GIFFHORN


Lowell
      W. Giffhorn


Chief
      Financial Officer




EX-4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000837290
<NAME> SHERRI NITTA
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,087
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,206
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,516
<PP&E>                                         241,389
<DEPRECIATION>                                  85,990
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 176,857
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,478
<BONDS>                                         60,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,955
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,918
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   176,857
<SALES>                                         18,399
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,541
<CGS>                                           11,123
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,123
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   836
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,070
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,954
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2,23
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,691
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,691
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30


</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DANA JENNIFER PAPPAS, Petitioner,
vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE ROB BARE, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Real Party in Interest. No. 70533


# FILED
JUL 1 3 2016

TRACIE K. UNDEMAN CLER OF UPREME COURT BY Th•

DEPUTY CLE K



### ORDER DENYING PETITION This is a petition for a writ of certiorari contending that the district court lacked jurisdiction to reverse an order of the municipal court granting a motion to suppress evidence in a criminal proceeding. Petitioner did not submit an appendix with his petition, 

### see NRAP 21(a)(4); thus, he has not demonstrated circumstances warranting our review, 

### see Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioners carry the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Moreover, his claim that the district court lacks authority over an appeal from a municipal court's grant of a motion to suppress evidence is without merit. 

### See NRS 189.120 (expressly conferring upon the district court the power to review an order of the justice court granting a defendant's motion to suppress evidence); NRS 5.073(1) ("The practice and proceedings in the municipal court must conform, as nearly as practicable, to the practice and proceedings of justice

(0) 1947A 

### e' J. Donlas )

J. courts in similar cases."); Sandstrom v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 121 Nev. 657, 661-62, 119 P.3d 1250, 1253-54 (2005) (recognizing appeals from municipal courts are treated the same as appeals from justice courts). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Cherry

Gibbons

cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Mueller Hinds & Associates Attorney General/Carson City Las Vegas City Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF' NEVADA 2

(DI 1947A er ,
No. 09-9367.

#### Edward Lopez De La Cruz, Petitioner v. Barry Larson, Warden, et al.

559 U.S. 1109, 130 S. Ct. 2408,

176 L. Ed. 2d 928,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3727.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS Proposed Rulemakings and Public Hearings Regarding State Petitions for Exemption from Federal Standards for Clothes Dryers and Kitchen Ranges and Ovens (Docket Numbers: CE-CP-SPRM) NY001.**WI002~** CA003. MN004, OR005 t

### ------------------------------------------------------**---------------~----<':t,.,;.;c::..-.,.** SEPTH1BER 

# uri**~**

. SUNDAY MONDAY**TU~DAY** 11 12 18 25 MADISON, WISCONSIN SEPTEr4BER 13 1 :00
- 5: OOpm / MINNEAPOL)S, MINNESOTA**SEPTEt~** 15

< 9: 00/,- 5: OOpm . 0

SAN FRANC ISCO, CAL.iFbRN IA SEPTEMBER 20**~** 9:00
- 5:00pm PORTLAND, OREGON SEPTEMBER 23 9:00
- 5:00pm NEW YORK CITY SEPTEMBER 26 9:00
- 5:00pm WASHINGTON, DC SEPTEMBER 30 9:00
- 5:00pm**WED~E§DAY** THRUSDAY FRIDM SATURDAY**j~.** c 0 " q Minneapolis
/J 14 15 16 21 22 28 29 212 East Washington Avenue Room 215, Small Business Administration Madison, Wisconsin 53703 

## u. S. Courthouse**~-#** /Federal Building, Room 

# * . 110 South 4th Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Internal Revenue Service 333 Market Street Suite 700 San Francisco, California 94105 17 24

Edith Green-Wendell Wyatt Federal BuiJding Room 229 1220 Southwest Third Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204 Jacob K. Javits Federal Building 26 Federal Plaza, Room 305C New**York~** New York U.S. Department of Energy Forrestal Building, Room 1E-245 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585REQUEST TO SPE.AX (Location)....,;;;;; .... NAME:

COMPANY:

# ---------"" ADORESS: __________________________________________________ __

PRONE:

LETTER ______________ _ 15 COPIES OF TESTLMONY:



# ------------------ SUBJECT: TIME SCHEDULED TO SPEAK: -""'- CONFIF.. ..1ED :

# ----------------
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.’s,Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-69188) of our report onthe audit of the financial statements of Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.,as of December 31, 2007, and for the two years then ended. Our report isdated May 16, 2008, and appears in Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc.’sAnnual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 
| /s/ Moss Adams LLP     |
|------------------------|
|                   |
| Santa Rosa, California |
| May 16, 2008      |
|                   |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 33-46573) pertaining to the Capital Bank, N.A. Retirement Savings
Plan, of our report dated January 15, 1999, with respect to the consolidated 
financial statements of Capital Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference in 
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.

                                             /S/ ERNST & YOUNG, LLP
                                             ERNST & YOUNG, LLP



Detroit, Michigan
February 23, 1999
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Nikolas Antonopoulos, President and Chief Executive Officer of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp.,certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date:  October 28, 2005 By:  /s/   *Nikolas Antonopoulos*    Nikolas Antonopoulos    President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
3.4 
 Stateof
Delaware
 Secretary ofState
 Division
of Corporations
 Delivered
04:03 PM 22/28/2007
 FILED
03:26 PM 12/28/2007
 SRV
071372575 - 3251589 FILE
  CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT
 OF
 CERTIFICATE
OF INCORPORATION
 OF
 AMERICAN
ACHIEVEMENT CORPORATION
  Pursuant
to Section 242 ofthe Delaware
 General
Corporation Law
   American
Achievement Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), hereby
certifies as follows:
  FIRST:The
name of the Corporation is American Achievement Corporation.
  SECOND:
Article 4A of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby
deleted in its entirety and restated as follows:
  4A. The
Corporation shall have authority to issue One Hundred (100) shares of Common
Stock, par value $0.000001 per share.
  4B
DELETED.
  THIRD:This
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation shall be
effective as of December 20, 2007, for accounting purposes only.
  FOURTH:
This Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation was duly adopted
by the requisite vote of the Board of Directors and by the vote of the holders
of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Corporation entitled to vote
thereon in accordance with Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation
Law.
  IN
WITNESS WIIEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Amendment as
of this 20th day of December, 2007.
  By:  /s/ DONALD J.
PERCENTI
 Name:
Donald J.
Percenti
 Title:
President/CEO
---

Exhibit 13.2

# CERTIFICATION

# Under 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned officers of Mamma.com Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, to
such officers knowledge, that:

(1)    Amendment No. 1 to the
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2005 of the Company (Form 20-F) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2)    The information contained in the Form 20-F
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

|Date: May 12, 2006 | By: /s/ Guy Fauré                                                 
|------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   | Guy FauréPresident and Chief Executive Officer                    
|Date: May 12, 2006 | By: /s/ Daniel Bertrand                                           
|                   | Daniel BertrandExecutive Vice-President andChief Financial Officer

63
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7707

JOSHUA ANDERSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

MARK BOLSTER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-00075-LO-TCB)

Submitted: July 26, 2022 Decided: Octcober 4, 2022

Before QUATTLEBAUM and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joshua Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew James Mezger, Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 20-7707 Doc: 20 Filed: 10/04/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Joshua Gary Anderson appeals from the district court’s orders denying relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he challenged his convictions by a general 

court-martial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

although we grant Anderson’s motions to file supplemental informal briefs, we affirm the 

court’s orders. Anderson v. Bolster, No. 1:19-cv-00075-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 2020;

filed Aug. 27, 2020 & entered Aug. 28, 2020). We deny Anderson’s motion to substitute 

party, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 20-7707 Doc: 20 Filed: 10/04/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5398 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5398

To amend the Clean Air Act to exclude from the definition of renewable 
   fuel any fuel that is imported or derived from any matter that is 
                               imported.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2006

 Mr. Salazar (for himself, Mr. Gutknecht, and Mr. Osborne) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Clean Air Act to exclude from the definition of renewable 
   fuel any fuel that is imported or derived from any matter that is 
                               imported.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``USA Fuels Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF IMPORTED FUEL FROM DEFINITION OF RENEWABLE FUEL.

    Subparagraph (C) of section 211(o)(1) of the Clean Air Act (42 
U.S.C. 7545(o)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(iii) Exclusion.--The term `renewable 
                        fuel' excludes any fuel described in clause (i) 
                        or (ii) that is imported or derived from any 
                        matter that is imported.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND FINANCE DIRECTOR PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS


ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Tomkins plc (the Company) for the year ended April 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James Nicol, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kenneth Lever as Finance Director of the Company, each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge;





| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------










/s/ James Nicol


---

By: James Nicol


Chief Executive Officer








/s/ Kenneth Lever


---

By: Kenneth Lever


Finance Director





October 25, 2002

















This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except as to the
extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]



# United States Court of Appeals

**For the First Circuit**

No. 01-1431 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. SUSAN S. CRANE, Defendant, Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. Gene Carter, U.S. District Judge ] Before Torruella, Selya and Lynch,

Circuit Judges .

Susan S. Crane on brief pro se. Paula D. Silsby , United States Attorney, and Margaret D. McGaughey , Appellate Chief, on brief for appellee.-2- December 27, 2001 Pe r Curiam . Pro se defendant Susan Crane appeals
a district court judgment that revoked her supervised release and sentenced her to an additional term of imprisonment. Having thoroughly reviewed the record and the parties' briefs on appeal, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding that Crane violated the three conditions of her supervised release. Further, the court did not abuse its discretion by revoking Crane's supervise d release term and imposing another term of imprisonment. The arguments that Crane makes to the contrary are either waived because she did not raise them below or patently meritless. See , e.g. , United States v. Maxwell , 254 F.3d 21, 25-30 (1 st Cir. 2001). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed . See Local Rule 27(c).
STATE v. Timothy Ray CASEY

133A09-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 1, 2019

Anne M. Middleton, Special Deputy Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Lauren E. Miller, Attorney at Law, for Casey, Timothy Ray.

*430The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st of March 2019 by Defendant to Dismiss Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
               18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED AND PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the quarterly report of American Achievement Corporation
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending February 23, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
G. Fiore, Chief Executive Officer of American Achievement Corporation, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American
       Achievement Corporation;

    (2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
       statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
       to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
       such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
       covered by this quarterly report;

    (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
       information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
       material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
       flows of American Achievement Corporation as of, and for, the periods
       presented in this quarterly report.

<Table>
<S>                                                    <C>  <C>
Dated: September 10, 2002                                               /s/ DAVID G. FIORE
                                                            -----------------------------------------
                                                                          David G. Fiore
                                                                     CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
</Table>