alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Hewitt Associates, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 7, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ John J. Park
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                  |  | John J. Park           
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                  |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Hewitt Associates, Inc. and will be retained by Hewitt
Associates, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
Ashley D. CARNEY v. WAKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE

No. 55P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Ashley D. Carney, For Carney, Ashley D.

Paul G. Gessner, Attorney at Law, Hal F. Askins, Attorney at Law, For Wake County Sheriff's Office

Hal Askins, Special Deputy Attorney General

Judge Paul G. Gessner, Attorney at Law

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 11th of February 2019 in this matter for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 prior to a determination by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of February 2019 by Plaintiff for Timely Filing of Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
GILSON v. DESCHENES

182P19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 16, 2019

Kathleen Deschenes, for Deschenes, Kathleen.

Thomas Gilson, for Gilson, Thomas.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th of May 2019 by Defendant for Emergency Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of May 2019."
STATE of North Carolina v. Tony Johnell MILLS

No. 64P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2019

Craig M. Cooley, Cary, Attorney at Law, for Mills, Tony Johnell.

Christopher McLennan, Assistant Attorney General, Brandy Cook, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 19th of February 2019 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th of February 2019 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."
Form of Consent



			
	Aquilex Holdings LLC	 	Exhibit 10.2

  

Form of Consent 
 FORM
OF CONSENT 
 Dated as of February 28, 2011 

The undersigned, AQUILEX ACQUISITION SUB III, LLC, AQUILEX CORPORATION, AQUILEX HYDROCHEM, INC., AQUILEX HYDROCHEM INDUSTRIAL CLEANING,
INC., AQUILEX SMS, INC., AQUILEX WSI, INC., AQUILEX FINANCE CORP. and AQUILEX SPECIALTY REPAIR AND OVERHAUL, INC., as Guarantors under the Credit Agreement referred to in the foregoing Amendment, hereby consent to such Amendment and hereby confirm
and agree that (a) notwithstanding the effectiveness of such Amendment, the Credit Agreement and Guaranty are, and shall continue to be, in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects, except that, on and after
the effectiveness of such Amendment, each reference in the Credit Agreement and Guaranty to the “Credit Agreement”, “thereunder”, “thereof” or words of like import shall mean and be a reference to the Credit Agreement,
as amended by such Amendment, and (b) the Collateral Documents to which such Grantor is a party and all of the Collateral described therein do, and shall continue to, secure the payment of all of the Guaranteed Obligations (in each case, as
defined therein).
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report (as defined under the preceding Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, Gerhard Entzmann,
Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of Superfund Capital Management, Inc., the
general partner of Quadriga Superfund, L.P. (the "Fund"), certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Fund.

                                           By: /s/ Gerhard Entzmann
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Gerhard Entzmann
                                           Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
                                           May 16, 2005

                                       E-5
No. 09-7891.

#### Wanda Renae Scott, aka Wanda Renae Scott Thomas, Petitioner v. South Carolina.

559 U.S. 1102, 130 S. Ct. 2399,

176 L. Ed. 2d 787,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3487.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 911, 130 S. Ct. 1297, 175 L. Ed. 2d 1087, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 992.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0046

IN THE MATTER OF:

L.L.M.-W.,

Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 13, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 8 2021

11/08/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0046
exv4w5









	stock certificate cusip 529771 10 7





 









 








	lexmark international, inc. this corporation will furnish without charge to each stockholder who so
requests, a statement of the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating,
optional or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications,
limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights.




	TEN COM  —  as tenants in commn            UNIF GIFT MIN ACT —  Custodian
TEN ENT  —  as tenants by the entireties (Cust) (Minor)
as joint tenants with right
of survivorship and not as
JT TEN  —  tenants in common            under Uniform Transfers to Minors
Act
(State)
UNIF GIFT MIN ACT —  Custodian (until age
)
—
(Cust)
under Uniform Transfers
to Minors Act
(State)
additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.
for value received hereby sell, assign and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP
CODE OF ASSIGNEE) shares of capital stock represented by the within Certificate and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the
within-named corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. dated: 20 Signature:
Signature: Notice: the signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as written upon
the face of the certificate, in every particular, without alteration or enlargement, or any change
whatever. signature(s) guaranteed: medaliion guarantee stamp the signature(s) should be guaranteed
by an eligible guarantor istitution (banks, stockbrokers, savings and loan associations and credit
unions) with membership in an approved signature guarantee medallion program, pursuant to s.e.c.
rule 17Ad-15. SECURITY INSTRUCTIONS THIS IS WATERMARKED PAPER, DO NOT ACCEPT WITHOUT NOTING
WATERMARK. HOLD TO LIGHT TO VERIFY WATERMARK.
Date: 26 July 2017 ******************************

NSN: 8940-00-782-3161 or 8940-01-487-7780 (NDC) * MONOGRAPH: MCW/LRP 18

 ******************************

Item: Non-dairy Creamer, Dry

Document: CID A-A-20043 Creamer, Non-dairy, Dry

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 19-21 Component Classification: Ancillary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Dry state: White to light cream color, granular powder that is free flowing and

free of lumps (see Special Notes).

Odor: Should approximate that of commercial, spray dried, non-dairy creamer

Flavor: Should approximate that of commercial; spray dried, non-dairy creamer

Texture:

Dry state: Granular, free-flowing powder, free of lumps / caked masses (see

Special Notes). When used in coffee, it should disperse/dissolve rapidly without curdling

and with only a slight trace of melted fat on the surface.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance:

Rehydrated: Not readily dispersed or dissolved when placed in hot liquid.

Dehydrated: Darkened, lumpy or caked.

Odor: Rancid, stale.

Flavor: Rancid, stale, oxidized, bitter, soapy, tallowy.

Texture: Lumpy, clumped, caked (see Special Notes).

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Initially examine in dry state for appearance and texture; then examine in instant coffee. If product is

caked or lumped in dry state, examine the package closely for cuts; tears, holes or open seals. Inserting

a pocket flashlight inside the package while in a dark room often aids in identifying package integrity 

defects. Also shake package vigorously ten times and observe for minute quantities of product that may

sift out of package especially at the juncture of the seams and the folded edge of the package. The

defect is appropriately called a sifter. When testing in coffee, drop creamer into coffee and observe 

particle dispersion for 15 seconds; then stir coffee for 15 seconds and observe after one minute for the

defects described above.

Special Notes

Lumps that break apart under light pressure (e.g:, pressed between the fingers gently) are of no concern.
Rebecca B. EVERETT and Simon J. Everett, Co-Administrators of the Estate of Simon T. Everett v. DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC; and FDB, LLC

No. 433P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Donald R. Strickland, Attorney at Law, Karen M. Rabenau, Attorney at Law, Thomas J. Wilson, Attorney at Law, James E. R. Ratledge, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Everett, Rebecca B., et al.

Jonathan E. Hall, Attorney at Law, Michael Joseph Crook, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC

Ann-Patton Hornthal, Attorney at Law, Lachicotte Zemp, Jr., Attorney at Law, Asheville, For FDB, LLC

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 19th of December 2018 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
#### In the Matter of Joseph Alfred R. and Others, Infants. Alfred B.R., Appellant; Leake & Watts Services, Respondent.

[718 NYS2d 833]

Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered on or about January 21, 1999, which, to the extent appealed from, terminated respondent father’s parental rights to the subject children upon a finding of mental illness, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In view of the history of this case and the evidence of respondent father’s mental illness dating back to 1988, his poor compliance with treatment and his failure to recognize that he was ill and needed help, and the conclusion of the court-appointed psychiatrist, that, as a result of his illness, respondent would not be able to provide proper care for the children in the foreseeable future, there was clear and convincing proof warranting termination of respondent’s parental rights pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b (4) (c) (see, *Matter of Shannon Monique*W., 245 AD2d 86, *lv denied*91 NY2d 809). Concur — Tom, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

      I, John D. Ryan, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Boundless
Corporation;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have:

            a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
      ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

            b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
      controls and procedures, and presented in this report my conclusions about
      the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

      5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

            a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
      design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

            b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting.


Date: August 31, 2005                           /s/ John D. Ryan
                                                --------------------------------
                                                John D. Ryan
                                                Acting Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATE
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. 1350)





The
undersigned, Michael J. Cunningham has executed this certificate in connection
with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s
report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 1, 2008 (the
“Report”).





The
undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”);
and





2. The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 9th
day of December 2008.





/s/
      MICHAEL J. CUNNINGHAMMichael
      J. CunninghamExecutive
      Vice President — Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)





This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


31
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7689** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. JULIAN SOTO CHAVEZ , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Robert J. Conrad, Jr. , Chief District Judge. ( 3:08

- cv - 00164

- RJC; 3:05

- cr - 00002

- RJC

- DSC

- 4 )

Submitted : April 28, 2011 Decided: May 3, 2011

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un p ublished per curiam opinion
. Julian Soto Chavez, Appellant Pro Se. Adam Christopher Morris, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Ju lian Soto Chavez seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (20 0 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstr ating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have indepen dently reviewed the record and conclude that Chavez has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pres ented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
No. 09-9918.

#### Stephen Alan Alberts, II, Petitioner v. Wheeling Jesuit University, et al.

560 U.S. 913, 130 S. Ct. 3310,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1200,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4026,

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 363 Fed. Appx. 276.
J. FREEMAN PROPERTIES, LLP, Plaintiff, v. CROSS DEVELOPMENT CC CHARLOTTE SOUTH, LLC, Defendant.

No. COA18-1176

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 3, 2019

DISMISSED.
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Boston Financial Qualified Housing Tax
Credits L.P. III (the "Partnership") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.



                                       /s/Gary Mentesana
                                       Gary Mentesana
                                       Principal Executive Officer and
                                       Principal Financial Officer
                                       Arch Street III, Inc., as
                                       Managing General Partner of
                                       Boston Financial Qualified
                                       Housing Tax Credits L.P. III

                                       Date:  July 16, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.