alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
05/02/201 1 13:0 7 FAX 202493514 2 FAA •>• DMS iOOI/00 2 

^ 

"WRTMEMTOh 

^cRATiOKs 

, i !'.-^' 2 'CD U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

Hand Delivered 

April 27, 2011 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

Wa.shington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: AppyllaLe DockeL Clerk, AGC-430 

US 800 Independence Avenue. S.W, 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

REC.cr,/pn 

DOCKET >-A„ 

Re: In the Matter of Empire Airlines ^ Inc. , FAA Docket 

No. CP09NM0009 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Please bo advised that I am henceforth the attorney of 

record for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in the 

above-referenced case. Accordingly, copies of all documents 

to be served on the FAA should be sent to me at the 

following address; 

James A. Barry 

Senior Attorney 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Admiinistration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591. 

Thank yoa foj: your attention to thi.s matter. 

Sincerely, 

James A. Barry, AGC-300 

cc: Courtney E. Felts, Esq, 
05/02/2011 13:07 FAX 2024935142 FAA * DMS @l002/002 

Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that on this date I have placed in 

the United states mail, post:age prepaid, certified 

return-receipl. reque-^ted, and sent by facsimile 

transmission, a copy o£ Comp.l ai nant's Entry of Appearance 

Letter In th e Matte r of Empire AirlinBii, Inc. , FAA Docket 

No- CP09NM0009, addressed to: 

Courtney E. Felts, Esq. 

Senior Attorney 

Federal Express, Inc. 

3 620 Hacks Cross Road 

Building B, 3^'' Floor 

Memphis, Tennessee 3812.5-8800 

In addition, I hereby certify that on this date I have 

hand-delivered the original and one copy of the foregoing 

document Jn the United States mail, postage prepaid, 

certified return-receipt requested, addres.5ed to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Appellate Docket Clerk, AGC-4 30 

P^rtt ^ fi>r<vT| 

Dated: April 27, 2011
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Christopher WEAVER

No. 63P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Meghan Adelle Jones, Attorney at Law, for Weaver, Michael Christopher.

Anna M. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

David Learner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*843***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th of February 2019 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-64,972]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on January 22, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Risdon International, Laconia, New Hampshire.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.  Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of February 2009.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-5183 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000837893
<NAME> 88AP.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         430,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  150,093
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               580,593
<PP&E>                                       4,842,343
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,931,081
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,491,855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,491,855
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,491,855
<SALES>                                        938,418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               958,590
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  534,021
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                424,569
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            424,569
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   424,569
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    37.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Darryl COLEY, Plaintiff, v. Latisha COWAN & Darryl Cowan, Defendants.

No. COA18-1020

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 7, 2019

REVERSED IN PART. AFFIRMED IN PART. REMANDED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Johnathan Dale STEVENS

No. COA18-983

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 2, 2019

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32 .1





Certification Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Imagenetix, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:





To my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: July 11, 2011
/s/WILLIAM P. SPENCERWilliam P. SpencerChief Executive Officer and President
STATE of North Carolina v. Justin Delane KRAFT

No. 448P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2019

Andrew M. Newman, Attorney at Law, for Kraft, Justin Delane.

Rory Agan, Associate Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*29***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of December 2018 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 20th of December 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th of January 2019 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."
NOONSAB v. STATE OF NC

131P16-12

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 11, 2019

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Somchai Noonsab, for Noonsab, Somchai.

Somchoi Noorsob, for Noorsob, Somchoi.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*220The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th of June 2019 by Petitioner to Dismiss:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of July 2019."
Penny E. JOHNSTON, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Roy R. JOHNSTON, Jr., Respondent/Appellant.

No. ED 105188

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: October 17, 2017 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied December 19, 2017

Edward L. Campbell, 1902 S. Baltimore, Suite 400, Kirksville, MO 63501, For Petitioner/Respondent.

William P. Nacy, 522 E. Capitol Avenue, Jefferson City, MO 65101, For Respondent/Appellant.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Roy R. Johnston, Jr. (Father) appeals from the trial court's October 13, 2016 Judgment and Order of Modification and Judgment for Contempt awarding Penny Johnston (Mother) sole legal custody of their child, R., and adjudging Father in contempt for repeatedly failing to comply with the court's past orders to have Mother's name removed from a debt incurred on a trailer awarded to Father in the 2008 dissolution of marriage judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's judgment is well within its discretion and is supported by substantial evidence. *Morgan v. Morgan*, 497 S.W.3d 359, 372 (Mo. App. E.D. 2016) ; *Davidson v. Fisher*, 96 S.W.3d 160, 164 (Mo. App. W.D. 2003). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         219,041
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  483,495
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (54,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  6,142,697
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,971,133
<PP&E>                                       9,555,860
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,153,837)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,026,030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,048,071
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,815,972
<OTHER-SE>                                     161,987
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,026,030
<SALES>                                      5,914,208
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,914,208
<CGS>                                        2,737,773
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,737,773
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,901,594
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             483,723
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (115,112)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (22,880)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (92,232)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (92,232)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         216,961
<SECURITIES>                                12,807,576
<RECEIVABLES>                                  378,710
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,990
<PP&E>                                       4,141,951
<DEPRECIATION>                                 771,521
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,791,667
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          407,962
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,383,705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,791,667
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               850,058
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  464,834
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                385,224
<INCOME-TAX>                                   385,224
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            385,224
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   385,224
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002)





In
connection with the annual report of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony E.
Applebaum, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, certify to my knowledge
and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and,





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
    Report.




Date
      January 27, 2010
              By:
              /s/  ANTHONYE. APPLEBAUMAnthony
      E. ApplebaumPrincipal
      Financial and Accounting Officer


(ii) A
certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed “filed” for
purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject
to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically
incorporates it by reference.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>          0000838796
<NAME>                Magnitude Information Systems, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                         249,569
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  137,025
<ALLOWANCES>                                    78,301
<INVENTORY>                                      8,885
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               924,156
<PP&E>                                         245,459
<DEPRECIATION>                                 145,579
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,220,223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,465,413
<BONDS>                                         35,755
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         1,034
<OTHER-SE>                                  (2,281,979)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,220,223
<SALES>                                        263,553
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               263,553
<CGS>                                          170,821
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  170,821
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                79,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,109
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             293,553
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,882,322)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (490,374)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,391,948)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,391,948)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)



</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: ADINA ZAHARESCU,

 Debtor,

ADINA ZAHARESCU,

 Appellant,

 v.

AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE

COMPANY; AMERIQUEST

MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.,

 Appellees.

No. 13-56339

D.C. No. 2:12-cv-09773-CAS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2015** 

Before: GOODWIN, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

FILED

APR 30 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Adina Zaharescu appeals pro se from the district court’s decision affirming

the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of her adversary proceeding alleging violations of

state and federal law in connection with foreclosure proceedings. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review independently the bankruptcy

court’s decision without deference to the district court’s determinations. Leichty v.

Neary (In re Strand), 375 F.3d 854, 857 (9th Cir. 2004). We may affirm the

bankruptcy court’s decision on any ground supported by the record. Olsen v.

Zerbetz (In re Olsen), 36 F.3d 71, 73 (9th Cir. 1994). We affirm.

Zaharescu’s claims against appellees were properly dismissed because those

claims were raised and decided on the merits, or could have been raised, in her

prior district court action against the same defendants or their privies. See United

States v. Liquidators of European Fed. Credit Bank, 630 F.3d 1139, 1150 (9th Cir.

2011) (setting forth elements of res judicata requirements and factors for

establishing identity of claims); Tahoe–Sierra Pres. Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Reg’l

Planning Agency, 322 F.3d 1064, 1081 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[A] dismissal on statute

of limitations grounds is a judgment on the merits.”). 

We reject Zaharescu’s contentions concerning the impact of her objection to

proofs of claim filed in another bankruptcy proceeding.

AFFIRMED.

2 13-56339
##### 



Exhibit 10.27
 (EQUIPMENT)
 Grant of Security Interest
   Possession of Collateral
 Covenants




---



##### 



Additional Actions by Secured Party
 -2-




---



##### 



Defaults
 Remedies
 Foreclosure
 Application of Proceeds and Deficiency
 -3-




---



##### 



Secured Partys Care of Collateral
 Amendments; Waivers; Remedies Cumulative
 Durable Power of Attorney
 Notices
 Applicable Law and Severability
 -4-




---



##### 



Successors and Assigns; Other Obligations; Duration of Security Interest
 Guaranty to Prevail
 Miscellaneous
 Changes in Organization.
 Entire Agreement ORAL AGREEMENTS OR COMMITMENTS TO LOAN MONEY, EXTEND CREDIT
OR TO FORBEAR FROM ENFORCING REPAYMENT OF A DEBT INCLUDING PROMISES TO EXTEND OR RENEW SUCH DEBT
ARE NOT ENFORCEABLE. TO PROTECT THE DEBTOR AND THE SECURED PARTY FROM MISUNDERSTANDING OR
DISAPPOINTMENT, ANY AGREEMENTS THE DEBTOR AND THE SECURED PARTY REACH COVERING SUCH MATTERS ARE
CONTAINED IN THIS WRITING, WHICH IS THE COMPLETE AND EXCLUSIVE STATEMENT OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE SECURED PARTY AND THE DEBTOR, EXCEPT AS THE SECURED PARTY AND THE DEBTOR MAY LATER AGREE IN
WRITING TO MODIFY IT.
  -5-




---



##### 



SYNERGETICS, INC.
(Debtor)By: /s/ Kurt W. GamppTitle: EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENTAddress of Principal Place of Business of Debtor:88 Hubble Drive
OFallon, Missouri 63304
 -6-