alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350) I, Sherice P. Bench, certify that: 
 1. I have reviewed this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of American Achievement Corporation and AAC
Group Holding Corp.; 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrants and have; a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrants, including their consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants respective board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. 
 Date: August 5, 2005 
 By:
    
    /s/ SHERICE P. BENCHSherice P. BenchCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER(principal financial officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             224
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,796
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (175)
<INVENTORY>                                     10,124
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,330
<PP&E>                                          18,392
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,256)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,836
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            71
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,756
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,854
<SALES>                                         31,737
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,737
<CGS>                                           22,697
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,092
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   184
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (95)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 416
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,443
<INCOME-TAX>                                        23
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,420
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,420
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION





In connection with this Quarterly Report of Hewitt Associates, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.





HEWITT ASSOCIATES, INC.(Registrant)By:    /S/    DALE L.
GIFFORDDale L. GiffordChief Executive Officer





Date: February 4, 2003
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


         We consent to the incorporation of our report dated August 15, 2000,
except as to Note 10, as to which the date is September 26, 2000, on the
financial statements of Heartsoft, Inc. (the "Company") at June 30, 2000 and
March 31, 2000 and 1999, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
transition period ended June 30, 2000, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 33-23138D).

TULLIUS TAYLOR SARTAIN & SARTAIN LLP

Tulsa, Oklahoma
September 27, 2000
No. 09-9235.

#### Roy L. Woodson, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

559 U.S. 1096, 130 S. Ct. 2377,

176 L. Ed. 2d 774,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3551,

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Safety Software Central Registry

Path Forward

Garrett Smith

Director, Office of Nuclear Safety
Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security

Safety Software Central Registry 

Path Forward

• Background and Objectives

– Evaluate if the Central Registry is being used as intended.

– Evaluate the idea that outdated software reduces assurance that 

calculations provide reliable results.

– No evidence of significant safety concerns or calculations that are 

erroneous due to issues with the Central Registry codes.

– Software use should fall into existing QA Programs (i.e., item 

requirements).
Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security

Site Discussions

Site Discussions – 5 Sites / 11 contractors

• Safety Software Central Registry 

– Describe your perception of the Safety Software Central Registry (SSCR). How does your 

organization use the SSCR in terms of its value within your organization? Regardless of 

version, has your organization used any of the codes listed in the SSCR? 

• SSCR Website Usage 

– Discuss the frequency of visits or access to the SSCR website, the information you are 

accessing, and the influence the SSCR codes may have on your adoption decisions. How do 

specific code versions listed on the SSCR impact your organization’s utilization of updated 

versions? 

• Implementation of Software 

– Describe your organization’s approach to procuring, managing, and implementing software 

related activities? In cases where the software that is listed on the SSCR, are there any 

variations or exceptions within your organization’s established software processes? 
Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security

Site Discussion Results

1. No Safety Concerns Expressed

2. Safety Software Central Registry 

Usage

– Don’t use CR code at all (40%) 

– Use updated version of CR codes 

(17%) 

– Use CR version (43%)

3. Top Codes Used

– Hotspot/EPICode

– MACCS2

– ALOHA

4. Inconsistent Application

– Code use is mandatory 

– Heavily relied on “DOE did all SQA”

– Unaware of the documentation and 

expectations outlined in the SSCR for 

codes

5. Error Notifications

40%

43%

17%

SSCR Code Usage

Don't use Use SSCR version Use Newer Version

27%

45%

18%

55%

27%

73%

18%

73%

55% 18%

18%

45%

64%

9%

73%

18%

18%

36%

64%

0%

45%

18%

27%

9%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

160%

Aloha CFAST EPICODE GENII HOTSPOT IMBA MACCS2 MELCOR

SSCR Usage by Code

Do not use CR Version Newer Version
Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security

Path Forward

Short Term (within the next two years)

• Rebranding of SSCR to focus on appropriate use of all codes, not just safety 

basis codes

• Central Point for Error Notification

• User Community of Practice

• Assist Field Offices and their contractors with their existing SQA Programs to 

ensure the programs meet requirements

• Work with EFCOG to Share SQA Documentation

Medium Term (within the next 4 years)

• Code Guidance

• DOE 414.1E/SQA Guide

• Training on code use and the guidance

Long Term (4 years and beyond)

• Revisit need for a centralized system of codes used for safety basis
No. 09-7461.

#### Dedra Ghee, Petitioner v. Target National Bank.

559 U.S. 1003, 130 S. Ct. 1935,

176 L. Ed. 2d 360,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2615.

March 22, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 21, 2018.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-16-00735-CR

NO. 14-16-00736-CR

MIGUEL ANGEL HERNANDEZ, Appellant 

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1458828 & 1458829 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Appellant appeals his convictions for robbery and evading arrest or detention 

with a motor vehicle. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he 

concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the 

requirement of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting 

a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable 
2

grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–13 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1978). 

 A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised 

of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford 

v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). At appellant’s request, the 

record was provided to him. On August 17, 2017, appellant filed a pro se response 

to counsel’s brief. 

 We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and appellant’s 

response, and agree the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we 

find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to 

the jurisprudence of the state. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised 

in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no 

arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2005). 

 Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. 

 PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Busby. 

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4826 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4826

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To extend through December 31, 2006, the authority of the Secretary of 
 the Army to accept and expend funds contributed by non-Federal public 
            entities to expedite the processing of permits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FUNDING TO PROCESS PERMITS.

    Section 214(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (33 
U.S.C. 2201 note; 114 Stat. 2594; 117 Stat. 1836; 119 Stat. 2169) is 
amended by striking ``March 31, 2006'' and inserting ``December 31, 
2006''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 14, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4826

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To extend through December 31, 2006, the authority of the Secretary of 
 the Army to accept and expend funds contributed by non-Federal public 
            entities to expedite the processing of permits.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                            1,131,255
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       907,752
<ALLOWANCES>                         30,000
<INVENTORY>                         833,180
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  3,088,685
<PP&E>                            9,045,342
<DEPRECIATION>                    2,788,399
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   10,721,185
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             1,343,699
<BONDS>                           2,667,623
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                       2,500,000
<COMMON>                             70,371
<OTHER-SE>                        4,139,492
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     10,721,185
<SALES>                          14,963,157
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          0
<CGS>                            10,652,677
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  3,706,283
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  333,778
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     429,496
<INCOME-TAX>                       (265,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 694,496
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        694,496
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.08
        


</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Juan Carlos AGUILAR GUTIERREZ

No. COA18-733

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 2, 2019

NO ERROR.
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8
(No. 333-02095) of Walter Industries, Inc. of our report dated February 28, 2007 except as it relates to the discontinued operations of Crestline Homes Inc. and
Kodiak Mining Company, LLC as described in Note 3 as to which the date is March 7, 2008 and February 26, 2009, respectively, and as it relates to the change in segments as
described in Note 18, as to which the date is March 7, 2008 relating to the financial statements, which appear in this Form 10-K.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Tampa, Florida
February 26, 2009

---



QuickLinks
No. 09-8255.

#### Frank Drummond, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 951, 130 S. Ct. 1538,

176 L. Ed. 2d 134,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1181.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Teressa B. ROUSE v. FORSYTH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES

No. 1PA19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Gloria L. Woods, Assistant County Attorney, for Forsyth County Department of Social Services.

Benjamin P. Winikoff, Attorney at Law, for Rouse, Teressa B.

Gloria L. Woods, Assistant County Attorney

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 2nd of January 2019 by Petitioner in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this *701Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Nicole Leigh Van Coller, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report (the Report) on Form 10-QSB of the small business issuer;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;  4.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:2/14/08By:/s/ Nicole Leigh Van CollerNicole LeighVan CollerPresident
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5241 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 to allow the Secretary of the Army to extend the period during which the Secretary 

may provide beach nourishment for a water resources development 

project. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2006 

Mr. MCINTYRE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 

to allow the Secretary of the Army to extend the period 

during which the Secretary may provide beach nourishment for a water resources development project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BEACH NOURISHMENT. 

4 Section 156 of the Water Resources Development Act 

5 of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 1962d–5f) is amended— 

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’ before 

7 ‘‘The Secretary’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5241 IH

1 ‘‘(b) REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS.—At the request 

2 of a non-Federal interest, the Secretary, acting through 

3 the Chief of Engineers, may extend the period during 

4 which the Secretary provides beach nourishment for a 

5 project under subsection (a) for such additional period as 

6 the Secretary determines necessary, except that the addi7 tional period may not exceed 50 years.’’. 

Æ 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS