alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-7476.

#### Brandon Laureys, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1132, 132 S. Ct. 1053,

181 L. Ed. 2d 773,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 129.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 397 U.S. App. D.C. 339, 653 F.3d 27.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jan David BARNETT

No. COA18-1183

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 18, 2019

NO ERROR IN PART. NEW TRIAL IN PART. DISMISSED IN PART.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 23-5048 September Term, 2022

1:22-cv-03805-UNA

Filed On: August 14, 2023

Raj K. Patel, The Excellent the Excellent,

from all capacities,

Appellant

v.

United States, et al.,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Henderson and Walker, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit

Judge

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s February 10, 2023 order

dismissing appellant’s complaint and civil action with prejudice be affirmed. On appeal,

appellant primarily challenges a decision by the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, and the

district court’s conclusion that it could not exercise jurisdiction to review that decision. 

The district court correctly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to review a decision by

the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. See Smalls v. United States, 471 F.3d 186, 192

(D.C. Cir. 2006). In addition, the district court correctly concluded that appellant’s

claims against a federal judge were barred by judicial immunity. See Stump v.

Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 359 (1978). To the extent appellant raised independent

claims against the United States, President Joseph R. Biden, and Robert Kiepura, any

such claims also arose from the proceedings before the U.S. Court of Federal Claims

and have not been preserved for appeal. See Cement Kiln Recycling Coal. v. EPA, 255

F.3d 855, 869 (D.C. Cir. 2001) (“A litigant does not properly raise an issue by

addressing it in a cursory fashion with only bare-bones arguments.”) (quotation marks

omitted). Lastly, to the extent appellant requests a writ of mandamus, he has not

shown a “clear and indisputable right” to mandamus relief. See Gulfstream Aerospace

Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp., 485 U.S. 271, 289 (1988).
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 23-5048 September Term, 2022

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy 

Deputy Clerk

Page 2
Montana Twenty First Judicial District Court. County of Ravalli.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- DAVID GEORGE DAHL, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-15-193

DECISION

On January 20, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced as follows: Charge I - A commitment to the custody of the Montana Department of Corrections for a period of twenty (20) years, of which ten (10) years were suspended, for the offense of Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs, a Felony, in violation of §45-9-102(6), MCA; and Charge II: A commitment to the custody of the Montana Department of Corrections for a period of twenty (20) years, of which ten (10) years were suspended, for the offense of Criminal Distribution of Dangerous Drugs, a Felony, in violation of §45-10-101(1), MCA. The Court ordered the suspended portion of these sentences to be on the conditions set forth in the Judgment filed in Cause No. DC-13-143. Charges I and II were ordered to run concurrently with each other and with the 5-year prison commitment in Cause No. DC-13-143.

The Court granted credit for time served for 141 days served in Cause No. DC-15-193 and credit for 192 days served in Cause No. DC-13-143, to be viewed concurrently. The Court further designated the Defendant a persistent felony offender. The Court ordered the Defendant be subject to a restriction that he will not be eligible for parole for a term of 5 years pursuant to the parties’ recommendations.

On November 17, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Peter Ohman of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from *102a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Done in open Court this 17th day of November, 2016.

DATED this 8th day of December, 2016.

Defense Counsel submitted the sentencing hearing transcript and two letters dated May 2, 2016 and October 13, 2016 from Dr. Wayne Yakes of the Vascular Malformation Center.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive. Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Crum & Forster Holdings
Corp., (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2004 (the Report)
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Mary Jane Robertson, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. Dated: November 5, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/  Mary Jane Robertson
Mary Jane Robertson
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 48 (Friday, March 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5124]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5280-N-09]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

DATES: Effective Date: March 13, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street SW., Room 7262, Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: March 5, 2009.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
 [FR Doc. E9-5124 Filed 3-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
No. 09-1095.

#### John Daily, et ux., Petitioners v. Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Department of Human Services, et al.

560 U.S. 905, 130 S. Ct. 3278,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1185,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3926.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Third Division, denied.

Same case below, 228 P.3d 1199.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ANNUAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                          35,813
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   85,362
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    249,833
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               506,206
<PP&E>                                       1,858,780
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,410,016
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,145,027
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,051,261
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           396
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,879,449
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,145,027
<SALES>                                      1,134,545
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,134,545
<CGS>                                          711,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  711,195
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,164,419
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             535,387
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,276,456)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,276,456)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,276,456)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP08-436-000]

Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened in this proceeding commencing at 10 a.m. on Thursday, January 8, 2009, at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426 for the purpose of exploring the possible settlement of the above-referenced dockets.

Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).

                    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please send an e-mail to                     *accessibility@ferc.gov*                     or call toll free 1-866-208-3372 (voice) or (202) 208-8659 (TTY), or send a FAX to (202) 208-2106 with the required accommodations.                

                    For additional information, please contact Marc Gary Denkinger, (202) 502-8662,                     *marc.denkinger@ferc.gov*                     or Lorna Hadlock, (202) 502-8737                     *lorna.hadlock@ferc.gov*.                

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-49 Filed 1-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
July 22, 2015

Mr. Cory Shelton

Kestrel Flight Solutions, Inc.

90 Waverly Drive

E101

Frederick, MD 21702

Dear Mr. Shelton:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§§ 45.23(b), 61.113(a) and (b), 61.133(a), 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2) and (c), 91.103, 91.109(a), 

91.119, 91.151(a), 91.203(a) and (b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your exemption request on behalf of Kestrel Flight Solutions, Inc. into the public 

docket (No. FAA−2015−1751) on May 18, 2015, but we are unable to process your request 

any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 

(copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the 

following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions, you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3
No. 09-9835.

#### Kenneth Hairston, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.

560 U.S. 913, 130 S. Ct. 3295,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1198,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3956.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District, denied.

Same case below, 603 Pa. 660, 985 A.2d 804.
No. 09-969.

#### Bryan J. Brown, Petitioner v. Indiana Board of Law Examiners.

559 U.S. 1038, 130 S. Ct. 2072,

176 L. Ed. 2d 415,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2762.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Indiana denied.
Exhibit 10.19

 

PROMISSORY NOTE

 

	
U.S.   $225,000.00
    	
Ames, Iowa
    	
May 2, 2008
    


 

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Charles J. Link (LINK), whose address is 14137 South Shore Drive, Clive, IA 50325, promises to pay, without set off, deduction or counterclaim of any kind or nature to NewLink Genetics Corporation (NEWLINK), whose address is 2901 South Loop Drive, Suite 3900, Ames, IA 50010, as Payee, or Holder, at the address of Payee or Holder listed in this Note, the principal sum of two-hundred and twenty-five thousand Dollars ($225,000.00).

 

The unpaid principal of this promissory note shall bear simple interest at the rate of six percent (6.00%) per annum.  Interest shall be calculated based on the principal balance outstanding as may be adjusted from time to time.  Interest on the unpaid balance of this Note shall accrue monthly but shall not be due and payable until such time as when the principal balance of this Note becomes due and payable.  The principal balance of this Promissory Note shall be due and payable on May 1, 2009.  There shall be no penalty for early repayment of all or any part of the principal.

 

LINK and all endorsers now or in the future becoming parties to this promissory note jointly and severally waive presentment and demand for payment, notice of dishonor, protest, and notice of protest of this promissory note.

 

LINK agrees to pay all costs and expenses of collection incurred by Payee or Holder of this promissory note, in or out of Court, including without limitation, Court related costs and expenses and reasonable attorneys’ fees and disbursements (including such costs, fees, and disbursements incurred on appeal of any litigation).  No extension of time for payment of this note payable and no alteration, amendment, or waiver of any provision of this note payable shall release, discharge, modify, change, or affect the liability of LINK under this promissory note.

 

No delay by Payee or Holder in enforcing any covenant or right under this line of credit shall be deemed a waiver of any covenant or right, and no waiver by Payee or Holder of any particular provision of this promissory note shall be deemed a waiver of any other provision or a continuing waiver of any particular provision, and except as so expressly waived in writing, all provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

 

This PROMISSORY NOTE shall be construed and enforced according to the laws of the State of Iowa.

 

Whenever used in this PROMISSORY NOTE, the terms “Holder”, “LINK”, “NEWLINK”, and “Payee” shall be construed in the singular or plurals as the context may require.

 

	
Charles   J. Link
    	
 
    	
NewLink   Genetics Corporation
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/   Charles J. Link 
    	
 
    	
/s/   Carl Langren 
    
	
Charles   J. Link
    	
 
    	
Carl   Langren, Controller
tesco1025.htm


Exhibit 10.25












FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


WHEREAS, Fernando Assing (“Executive”) and Tesco Corporation entered into the Employment Agreement dated May 11, 2009 (the “Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, Section 7(i)(v) of the Agreement has an error with respect to the timing of payment and no amount is vested thereunder and the parties desire to amend Section 7(f) of the Agreement to add requirements under new guidance from the Internal Revenue Service;


 


NOW, THEREFORE in consideration of mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed that the Agreement shall be amended as follows:


 



	
1.  

	
Section 7(f) shall be amended to add the following at the end thereof:







 


“Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, to the extent any amounts payable under Sections 7(c), (d) or (e) are deferred compensation and not otherwise exempt from the requirements of Code Section 409A, no payment will be paid or commence to be paid hereunder until the date which is the 60th day after the Date of Termination.”


 



	
2.  

	
Section 7(i)(v) shall be amended so that the word “second” shall be replaced with the word “first” in each place in which it occurs.







 


This First Amendment may be executed by portable document format (pdf) or facsimile signature which signature shall be binding on the parties hereto.


 


WHEREAS, the parties have executed this First Amendment effective as of December 31, 2010.


 


EXECUTIVE                                                                                     TESCO CORPORATION







FERNANDO ASSING

















/s/ Fernando Assing                                                      By: /s/ Julio M. Quintana                                                      


Fernando Assing                                                                                     Julio M. Quintana


President and CEO






  





1
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Bullion River Gold Corp. (the
      "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
      Report"), we, Peter M. Kuhn, Chief Executive Officer and Daniel Graves, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Registrant.








Dated: 
May
              15, 2006
            
            /s/ Peter
              M.
              KuhnPeter
                M. Kuhn
              Chief Executive Officer and
                Director


|                                |                                                                                            |                              
|------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------
|                                |                                                                                           
|                                |                                                                                            |                              
|Dated:
            May 15, 2006 |                                                                                            | /s/ Daniel
            Graves
|                                |                                                                                           
|                                | Daniel
              Graves
            Chief Financial Officer and
              Director