alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w23






Exhibit
10.23




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO




THE AMENDED AND RESTATED




THE GEO GROUP, INC. 2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN




     WHEREAS, the Amended and Restated The GEO Group, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”)
is currently in effect; and



     WHEREAS, The GEO Group, Inc. (the “Company”) wishes to amend the Plan.



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective March 1, 2011 as follows:



     1. Section 5(c)(ii) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting all of its text, and replacing
it with the following text:




	 	 	“With respect to the shares of Common Stock reserved pursuant to this Section, (i) a
maximum of One Million Eighty Three Thousand (1,083,000) of such shares were
issuable prior to July 12, 2010, in connection with Awards, other than Stock Options
and Stock Appreciation Rights, that are settled in Common Stock, and (ii) a maximum
of One Million Eighty Three Thousand (1,083,000) of such shares may be issued after
July 12, 2010 in connection with Amounts, other than Stock Options, and Stock
Appreciation Rights, that are settled in Common Stock.”






	 	 	2. Except as modified by this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the Plan
shall remain valid and in full force and effect.





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Company, has executed
this instrument as of the 1st day of March 2011, on behalf of the Company.



	 	 	 	 	 

	THE GEO GROUP, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ John J. Bulfin	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Name:

	 	John J. Bulfin	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	Senior Vice President, General Counsel
STATE of North Carolina v. ONTREL LATRE GILCHRIST, Defendant.

No. COA18-479

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 18, 2019

NO PREJUDICIAL ERROR IN PART. NO ERROR IN PART.
ex10-52.htm







Exhibit 10.52







DIRECTOR / OFFICER INDEMNIFICATION












This Director/Officer Indemnification is granted to Mr. Daniel Penni (“D-O”), an individual residing in the State of Florida and currently serving as Acting President and Chief Executive Officer of Digital Angel Corporation, as well all as an officer or director of one or more of its affiliates or subsidiaries (“DIGA”).







DIGA shall indemnify and hold harmless D-O to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law against all costs (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs), judgments, penalties, fines, amounts paid in settlements, interest, and all other liabilities incurred or paid by D-O in connection with the investigation, defense, prosecution, settlement, or appeal of any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit, or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative and to which D-O was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party by reason of the fact that D-O is or was an officer, employee, director or agent of DIGA or its affiliates or subsidiaries, or by reason of anything done or not done by D-O in any such capacity or capacities, provided that the D-O acted in good faith and in a manner D-O reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the DIGA or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his/her conduct was unlawful.







DIGA also shall pay any and all expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees) incurred by D-O as a result of D-O being called as a witness in connection with any matter involving DIGA and/or any of its officers or directors.  Nothing herein shall limit or reduce any rights of indemnification to which D-O might be entitled under the organizational documents of DIGA, its affiliates or subsidiaries, or as allowed by applicable law.  This indemnification shall be governed by Delaware law.







Signed this 1st day of February, 2012.


 




	 	DIGITAL ANGEL CORPORATION	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Lorraine Breece	 
	 	 	Lorraine Breece	 
	 	 	Chief Financial Officer
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5085 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to promote and expedite wireless 

broadband deployment in rural and other areas, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 4, 2006 

Mr. INSLEE (for himself, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. GILLMOR, and 

Mr. BOUCHER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to promote and 

expedite wireless broadband deployment in rural and 

other areas, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Broadband 

5 for Communities Act’’. 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5085 IH 

1 SEC. 2. UNUSED TELEVISION SPECTRUM MADE AVAILABLE 

2 FOR WIRELESS USE. 

3 Part I of title III of the Communications Act of 1934 

4 (47 U.S.C. 301 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end 

5 the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 342. UNUSED BROADCAST TELEVISION SPECTRUM 

7 MADE AVAILABLE FOR WIRELESS USE. 

8 ‘‘Any unused broadcast television spectrum in the 

9 band between 54 and 698 megaHertz, inclusive, other 

10 than spectrum in the band between 608 and 614 mega11 Hertz, inclusive, may be used by unlicensed devices, in12 cluding wireless broadband devices.’’. 

13 SEC. 3. FCC TO FACILITATE USE. 

14 Within 180 days after the date of enactment of this 

15 Act, the Federal Communications Commission shall— 

16 (1) adopt minimal technical and device rules in 

17 ET Docket Nos. 02–380 and 04–186 to facilitate 

18 the robust and efficient use of the spectrum made 

19 available under section 342 of the Communications 

20 Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 342) by unlicensed devices, 

21 including wireless broadband devices; and 

22 (2) establish rules and procedures to— 

23 (A) protect incumbent licensed services, in24 cluding broadcast television and public safety 

25 equipment, operating pursuant to their licenses 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5085 IH 

1 from harmful interference from such unlicensed 

2 devices; 

3 (B) address complaints, no later than 30 

4 days after receipt, from licensed broadcast sta5 tions that an unlicensed device using such spec6 trum causes harmful interference that include 

7 verification, in the field, of actual harmful in8 terference; 

9 (C) require manufacturers of unlicensed 

10 devices designed to be operated in this spectrum 

11 to submit a plan to the Commission to remedy 

12 actual harmful interference to the extent that 

13 harmful interference is found by the Commis14 sion which may include disabling or modifying 

15 the unlicensed device remotely; and 

16 (D) require certification of unlicensed de17 vices designed to be operated in that spectrum 

18 to ensure that they meet the technical criteria 

19 established under paragraph (1) and can per20 form the functions described in subparagraph 

21 (C). 

Æ 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002**

| Date:                November 14, 2008 |                                                 |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   |                                                 |
|                                   | /s/                Jinyuan Li         |
|                                   |                                                 |
|                                   | Jinyuan                Li                            |
|                                   | Chief                Executive Officer and President |
|                                   | (Principal                Executive Officer)         |
|                                   |                                                 |
| Date:                November 14, 2008 |                                                 |
|                                   |                                                 |
|                                   | /s/                Zheng Wan          |
|                                   |                                                 |
|                                   | Zheng                Wan                             |
|                                   | Chief                Financial Officer               |
|                                   | (Principal                Accounting Officer)        |

----
Henry 5w<*flty fr-M-GOlHfr-GR

Dear £<r or /IIaJam ,

rtEC'D \H COURT OF APPEALS

12thCourt of Appeals District

TV^EYM EXi\SV \ i

i CATHY S. L.USK, CLtek !

Of APf>eaf*

Tyler x*

Ilia COfft<\i 5>W,Vn -,y~ /*, *« , J. I a * L- J J'vr<? //j^ fl0 a££e$£ J.a & coaifurer &r- c/?Py /hack,x>r„

X tmhky ak He c#u4- 4* ccfibider less £apt**,<inJ +h«J~ *

•rit>*> ,

Henry M^^.^ey
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of International Business Ventures Group, Inc. (“IBVG”) because of questions regarding the accuracy of assertions by IBVG, and by others, of publicly disseminated information concerning, among other things, IBVG's products and business prospects. 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above listed company. 

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities in the above listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST, March 6, 2009 through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on March 19, 2009. 

By the Commission. 

J. Lynn Taylor, 

Assistant Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E9-5169 Filed 3-6-09; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Generations Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned,  John  D. Carini, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David
K. George, President of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.

This  13th  day  of  August,  2002.
      ----


                                            /s/ John D. Carini
                                            --------------------------
                                            John D. Carini
                                            Chief Executive Officer



                                           /s/ David K. George
                                           --------------------------
                                           David K. George
                                           President and Principal
                                           Accounting Officer


                                       12
<PAGE>
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 21 , 2018.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 16 -00735- CR NO. 14- 16 -00736- CR

MIGUEL ANGEL HERNAND EZ , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 1458828 & 1458829

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant appeals his convictions for robbery and evading arrest or detention with a motor vehicle. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirement of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable2

grounds to be advance d. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 811– 13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford
v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). At appellant’s request, the record was provided to him. On August 17, 2017, appellant filed a pro se response
to counsel’s brief.
We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and appellant’s response, and agree the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised
in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Busby. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10339-10340]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5071]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6515]


Notice of Closed Meeting of the Cultural Property Advisory 
Committee

    In accordance with the provisions of the Convention on Cultural 
Property Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.) (the Act) there 
will be a meeting of the Cultural Property Advisory Committee on 
Tuesday, March 24, from approximately 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., and on 
Wednesday, March 25, from approximately 9 a.m. to 1 p.m., at the 
Department of State, Annex 44, Room 840, 301 4th St., SW., Washington, 
DC. At this meeting the Committee will carry out its interim review 
function with respect to the Memorandum of Understanding Between the 
Government of the United States of America and the Government of the 
Republic of Nicaragua Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions 
on Archaeological Material from the Pre-Hispanic Cultures of Nicaragua. 
The

[[Page 10340]]

Committee will conduct an interim review of the effectiveness of the 
MOU pursuant to the Act and will focus its attention on Article II. 
This is not a meeting to consider extension of the MOU. Such a meeting 
will be scheduled and announced in the future and will include a public 
session.
    The Committee will also undertake an internal security and ethics 
briefing, as required annually.
    The Committee's responsibilities are carried out in accordance with 
provisions of the Act. Related information may be found at http://exchanges.state.gov/culprop.
    The meeting on March 24-25 will be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(9)(B) and 19 U.S.C. 2605(h).

    Dated: March 2, 2009.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
 [FR Doc. E9-5071 Filed 3-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
No. 09-10103.

#### Michael Reilly, Petitioner v. United States.

560 U.S. 915, 130 S. Ct. 3301,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1203,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4039.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 359 Fed. Appx. 662.
STATE of North Carolina v. Melvin Lamar FIELDS

No. 170A19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Richard Croutharmel, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Fields, Melvin Lamar.

Lisa Bradley, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 6th of May 2019 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by State of NC on the 21st of May 2019 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Accordingly, the new brief of the State of NC shall be filed with this Court not more than 30 days from the date of certification of this order.
Montana Fourth Judicial District Court. County of Missoula.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- GREGORY ALAN THOMPSON, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-14-498

DECISION

On January 27, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to the Department of Corrections for a period of thirteen (13) months for placement in an appropriate correctional facility. If the Defendant successfully completed a residential alcohol treatment program approved by the Dept, of Corrections, the remainder of the 13 month sentence would be served on probation. This sentence would be followed by a three (3) year suspended commitment to the Dept, of Corrections. The sentence was ordered to run concurrent with DC-15-500. The Defendant was ordered to pay a $1,000 fine, $180 court fees, and his Public Defender fee of $800 was waived. The Defendant was credited with 159 days of time served. He was given 10 days credit at the rate of $100 per day toward his fine.

On August 4, 2016, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Defendant was present and was represented by Peter Ohman of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood *86this and stated that he wished to proceed. The Defendant was before the Sentence Review Division for two matters and his attorney, Mr. Ohman, advised the Sentence Review Division that the Defendant wanted to waive his right to sentence review on this first matter.

Done in open Court this 4th day of August, 2016.

DATED this 24th day of August, 2016.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the application for review of sentence is WAIVED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member and Hon. Brad Newman, Member.
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002)





In
connection with the annual report of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory F. Kowal,
Chief Executive Officer ,certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an
officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and,





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
    Report.




Date
      January 27, 2010
              By:
              /s/ ANTHONYE. APPLEBAUMAnthony
      E. ApplebaumPrincipal
      Financial and Accounting Officer


(ii) A
certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed “filed” for
purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject
to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically
incorporates it by reference.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5298 

To amend the Adams National Historical Park Act of 1998 to include 

the Quincy Homestead within the boundary of the Adams National 

Historical Park, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 4, 2006 

Mr. DELAHUNT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Adams National Historical Park Act of 1998 

to include the Quincy Homestead within the boundary 

of the Adams National Historical Park, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; FINDINGS. 

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 

5 ‘‘Adams National Historical Park Boundary Addition Act 

6 of 2006’’. 

7 (b) FINDING.—The Quincy Homestead has been des8 ignated a National Historic Landmark. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5298 IH

1 SEC. 2. ADDITION TO ADAMS NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK. 

2 Section 4(b) of the Adams National Historical Park 

3 Act of 1998 (16 U.S.C. 410eee–2(b)) is amended— 

4 (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as para5 graph (3); and 

6 (2) by adding after paragraph (1) the following 

7 new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(2) The property at 34 Butler Road in Quin9 cy, Massachusetts, known as the Quincy Homestead 

10 and carriage shed, consisting of approximately 1.8 

11 acres, as generally depicted on the map entitled 

12 ‘Boundary Addition Adams National Historical 

13 Park’, numbered N.E.R.R.D. 386/80,001, and dated 

14 August, 2003.’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS