alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65, 359]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 24, 2009, in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers at The Modesto Bee; Ad Production Group; Modesto, California.

The petitioning group of workers is covered by an active certification (TA-W-64, 860) which expires on February 11, 2011.

Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC this 25th day of February 2009.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E9-5036 Filed 3-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 99

                 STRATFORD AMERICAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Stratford American Corporation and
Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), we, Mel L. Shultz, President and Director of the Company, David H.
Eaton, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, and
Daniel E. Matthews, Controller, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Mel L. Shultz
---------------------------------------
Mel L. Shultz, President and Director
March 31, 2003


/s/ David H. Eaton
---------------------------------------
David H. Eaton, Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board
March 31, 2003


/s/ Daniel E. Matthews
---------------------------------------
Controller, Secretary and Treasurer
March 31, 2003
STATE of North Carolina v. Joshua Iran QUEEN

No. COA18-819

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 4, 2019

NO ERROR IN PART. REVERSED IN PART.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
     I, Mary Jane Robertson, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Crum &Forster Holdings Corp., certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  (c)  disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: April 29, 2005 By:  /s/ *Mary Jane Robertson*    Mary Jane Robertson    Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5224 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2006 

Received 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 350 Uinta Drive in Green River, Wyoming, 

as the ‘‘Curt Gowdy Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

HR 5224 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. CURT GOWDY POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 350 Uinta Drive in Green River, 

4 Wyoming, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Curt 

5 Gowdy Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Curt Gowdy Post Of10 fice Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 25, 

2006. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
No. 09-9499.

#### Jesus Berrios and Christopher W. Rivera, Petitioners v. New York, et al.

560 U.S. 908, 130 S. Ct. 3281,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1190,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3915.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Bryan Seth Williams , Appellant

No. 06

- 21

- 00024

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 188th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. 48328

- A ). Memorandum Op inion delivered by Justice Stevens

, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice van Cleef participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opi nion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, we mod i f y the bill of costs and judgment by deleting the time payment fee and to reflect that the amount of court costs owed is $22 4 .00

. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. We note that the appellant, Bryan Seth Williams , has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.
RENDERED JUNE 7, 2022 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
STATE of North Carolina v. Jasmine L. BURTON

No. 103P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2019

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Jasmine L. Burton, for Burton, Jasmine L.

Wallace W. Bradsher, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 25th of March 2019 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Person County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of March 2019 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of March 2019 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."
No. 85-5731.

#### Brown *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari is granted limited to the following question: “In cases pending on direct appeal, should the holding in *Batson*v. *Kentucky, ante,*p. 79, be given retroactive effect?” Case is set *1158for oral argument in tandem with No. 85-5221, *Griffith*v. *Kentucky,*immediately *supra.*
No. 09-7887.

#### Tavares Antonio McDuffie, Petitioner v. Florida.

559 U.S. 1102, 130 S. Ct. 2399,

176 L. Ed. 2d 787,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3600.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 944, 130 S. Ct. 1514, 176 L. Ed. 2d 123, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 1194.
Exhibit 10(h)

 

 

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE CBS EXCESS 401(K) PLAN FOR DESIGNATED SENIOR EXECUTIVES

PART B — AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT AS OF JANUARY 1, 2009 (THE “PLAN”)

 

Except as otherwise noted herein, the following amendments shall be effective as of January 1, 2009.

 

1.             Section 1.3 of the Plan is hereby amended to delete the last sentence and to insert in place thereof the following:

 

“Elections as to the time and form of payment made by a Reporting Employee (or an employee whose securities may be attributable to a Reporting Employee) under the CBS Excess 401(k) Plan prior to the date his account is transferred to this Plan shall remain in full force and effect following the transfer.”

 

2.             Section 2.4 of the Plan is hereby amended to insert the phrase “(or annual component of a cash bonus plan)” immediately following the phrase “annual cash bonus plan”.

 

3.             Section 2.9 of the Plan is hereby amended to delete the phrase “pre-tax” in the first sentence thereof.

 

4.             Section 6.1 of the Plan is hereby amended to delete the phrase “deferred by a Participant and vested for purposes of Code Section 409A” and to insert in place thereof the word “Deferred”.

 

5.             Section 6.2(a) of the Plan is hereby amended to delete such section in its entirety and to insert in place thereof the following:

 

“(a)      Amounts, if any, in a Participant’s Post-2004 Subaccount will be credited through December 31st of the calendar year in which the Participant experiences a Separation from Service with an amount equal to the amount which would have been earned had such amounts been invested in the same Investment Options and in the same proportion as the Participant may elect, from time to time, to have his contributions invested under the CBS 401(k) Plan (other than the Self-Directed Account).”

 

6.             Section 8 of the Plan is hereby amended to delete the phrase “, whether or not the Participant demonstrates that an Unforeseeable Emergency exists,” in the penultimate sentence thereof and to replace it with the phrase “, even if the Participant demonstrates that an Unforeseeable Emergency exists,”.
**Exhibit 32**

AMANASU TECHNO HOLDINGS CORPORATION**Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer			Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,			As Adopted Pursuant to			Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

		  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of          the registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the registrant's          Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the "Form          10Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form          10Q, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition          and results of operations of the registrant.		

 Dated: June 8, 2009
			 By: /s/ Yukinori Yoshino					Yukinori Yoshino					President
No. 09-9261.

#### Christopher Grisel, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1025, 130 S. Ct. 1931,

176 L. Ed. 2d 398,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2429.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 344 Fed. Appx. 218.
c • . • i f n* » It . 

# 4di C
February24 , 201 0 Th e Honorabl e Ra

yLaHoo d Secretary Unite d State s Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerseyAvenue , S E Washington , D.C . 

### 2059 0 Subject : Haned a Combinatio n Service s Allocatio n Proceedin g DOT-OST-2010-001 8 Dea rSecretaryLaHood : A s a dedicate d trave l partne ro fAmerica n Airlines , I a m writin g i n suppor to fAmerican' s applicatio n t o provid e ne wservic e fro m Ne wYork' s Joh n F. Kenned yInternationa l Airpor tan d Lo s Angele s Internationa l Airpor t t o Toky o Internationa l Airpor t a t Haneda . I recogniz e an d applau d yo u an d th e Obam a administratio n fo ryou rsucces s las tDecembe ri n reachin g a landmar k

Ope n Skie s agreemen t wit h Japan , whic h open s u p Haned a t o servic e b yU.S . airlines . I encourag e you rselectio n o fAmerica n Airline s t o provid e nonsto p servic e fro m Ne wYor k an d Lo s Angele s t o Haned a i n orde rt o provid e a n essentia l connectio n betwee n thre e o fth e world' s financia l an d commerc e centers . Recen t events , includin g th e successfu l preservatio n o fJapa n Airlines ' oneworl d Allianc e membership , hav e underscore d American' s stron g commitmen tt o th e trans-Pacifi cmarket . America n i s likewis e committe d t o Ne wYor k

an d Lo s Angle s - bot h vita l foca l point s o fbusiness , trade , entertainment , technolog yan d educatio n

- providin g unsurpasse d ai rservic e sinc e th e mid-1900 s Bot h th e Ne wYor k

an d Los Angele s metr o area s wil l gai n significan t economi cbenefit s fro m thes e propose d ne wflights , a

s wil l American' s customer s an d employees . However , w e nee d you rhel p t o mak e th e JFK/Haned a connectio n a reality . Therefore , I strongl yurg e yo u t o sa yye s t o America n Airline s an d it s reques tfo rslot s t o fl yfro m Kenned yt o Haneda ! Sincerely , ]C^O<.\\\]r

O C/)'/IA/T ^

H.I.S . Internationa l Tour s (NY) , Inc .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Clover
Appreciation Properties I, L.P. 1996 Year-End 10-K and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-K filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000837103
<NAME> CLOVER APPRECIATION PROPERTIES I L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                     4,662
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,532,836
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      7,325,375
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (778,860)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,532,836
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,653,175
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,554,085
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             685,495
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (900,910)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (248.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Investment property held for sale was $7,370,000 at December 31, 1996.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### Edith Gertrude Tydings, *Appellant,*v. Charley R. Tydings, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed March 8, 1928.

*W. E. Smith,*for Appellant;

*Anderson <& Anderson,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5132 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5132

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 
 study to determine the suitability and feasibility of including in the 
National Park System certain sites in Monroe County, Michigan, relating 
       to the Battles of the River Raisin during the War of 1812.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``River Raisin National Battlefield 
Study Act''.
SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY, MONROE COUNTY, MICHIGAN, SITES RELATING 
TO BATTLES OF THE RIVER RAISIN.
    (a) Study Required.--The Secretary of the Interior shall conduct a 
special resource study of sites in Monroe County, Michigan, relating to 
the Battles of the River Raisin on January 18 and 22, 1813, and their 
aftermath to determine--
        (1) the national significance of the sites; and
        (2) the suitability and feasibility of including the sites in 
    the National Park System.
    (b) Requirements.--The study conducted under subsection (a) shall 
include the analysis and recommendations of the Secretary on--
        (1) the effect on Monroe County, Michigan, of including the 
    sites in the National Park System; and
        (2) whether the sites could be included in an existing unit of 
    the National Park System.
    (c) Consultation.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), 
the Secretary shall consult with--
        (1) appropriate Federal agencies and State and local government 
    entities; and
        (2) interested groups and organizations.
    (d) Applicable Law.--The study required under subsection (a) shall 
be conducted in accordance with Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-1 et 
seq.).
    (e) Report.--Not later than three years after the date on which 
funds are first made available for the study, the Secretary shall 
submit to the Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives 
and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a 
report containing--
        (1) the findings of the study; and
        (2) any conclusions and recommendations of the Secretary.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```