alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016223EN.01000801.xml

| 21.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/8

---

Notice for the attention of the persons to whom restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2012/285/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 377/2012 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies threatening the peace, security or stability of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau apply

(2016/C 223/09)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in Annexes II and III to Council Decision 2012/285/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 377/2012 (2) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies threatening the peace, security or stability of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau.

1

2

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons designated in the abovementioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2012/285/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 377/2012 should continue to apply to those persons.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites listed in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 377/2012, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned lists should be reconsidered, by 30 April 2017, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, in accordance with Article 5(2) of Decision 2012/285/CFSP and Article 11(4) of Regulation (EU) No 377/2012.

---

(1)  OJ L 142, 1.6.2012, p. 36.

1

(2)  OJ L 119, 4.5.2012, p. 1.

2

---
STATE v. Christopher B. SMITH

119PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 20, 2019

Jason C. Yoder, Attorney at Law, for Smith, Christopher B.

Tiffany Y. Lucas, Assistant Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 20th of May 2019 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of May 2019."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 10th day of July 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
No. 09-686 (R46-011).

#### Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Petitioner v. Viva Leroy Nash.

559 U.S. 999, 130 S. Ct. 1757,

176 L. Ed. 2d 224,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2342.

March 15, 2010.

The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the above-entitled case was dismissed today pursuant to this Court’s Rule 46.

Same case below, 581 F.3d 1048.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4962 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

100 Pitcher Street in Utica, New York, as the ‘‘Captain George A. 

Wood Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 15, 2006 

Mr. BOEHLERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 100 Pitcher Street in Utica, New York, as 

the ‘‘Captain George A. Wood Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CAPTAIN GEORGE A. WOOD POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 100 Pitcher Street in Utica, New 

7 York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Captain 

8 George A. Wood Post Office Building’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4962 IH 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Captain George A. 

5 Wood Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review, Special Emphasis Panel Virology.                    

*Date:*                         March 12, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Marian Wachtel, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3208, MSC 7858, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-435-1148.                         *wachtelm@csr.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 3, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-4988 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICEROF PACIFIC ENERGY MANAGEMENT LLCPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350 and in connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 that is being filedconcurrently with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned officer of Pacific Energy Management LLC,general partner of Pacific Energy GP LP, which is the general partner ofPacific Energy Partners, L.P. and its subsidiaries (the “Partnership”) herebycertifies that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|        | /s/ IRVIN  TOOLE, JR.               |
|--------|------------------------------------------|
|   | Irvin Toole, Jr.August 7, 2006 |

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Pacific Energy Partners, L.P., and willbe retained by Pacific Energy Partners, L.P., and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Exhibit 10.19



 Exhibit 10.19 
 Description of Non-Employee Director Compensation 
 Each
non-employee director of Markel Corporation (“Company”) receives for services as director an annual fee of $40,000, plus reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection with attending meetings and training sessions attended at the
Company’s request. The Company also matches up to $5,000 per year in charitable contributions made by each non-employee director. 
 Non-employee directors also receive a grant of approximately $80,000 in restricted stock annually, calculated based on the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the grant date.
Non-employee directors are also eligible to participate, up to the total amount of fees received by the director, in the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase and Bonus Plan (“Stock Plan”). Under the Stock Plan, amounts specified by a
director are withheld from that director’s fees and forwarded to an independent administrator who purchases shares of the Company’s Common Stock on behalf of the director participant. In addition, the Company provides a “bonus”
of 10% of the net increase in shares owned under the Stock Plan in a calendar year.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 16-13528-J, 16-13804-J, & 16-13857-J

________________________ IN RE: LARRY LEONARD, Petitioner.

__________________________ Application for Leave to File a Second or Successive Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)

_________________________ Before: MARCUS, MARTIN, and JORDAN, Circuit Judges
B Y T H E P A N E L: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255(h) and 2244( b)(3)(A), Larry Leonard has filed an application seeking an order aut horizing the district court to consider a second or successive motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sent ence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Such authorization may be granted only if this Court certifies that the second or successive motion contains a claim involving: (1) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficien t to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder w ould have found the m ovant guilty of the offense; or (2) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, th at was previously unavailable. 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). “The court of appeals may authorize the filing of a second or successive application only if it determines that the appl ication makes a prima facie showing that the

Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 1 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 2 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 3 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 4 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 5 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 6 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 7 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 8 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 9 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 10 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 11 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 12 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 13 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 14 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 15 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 16 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 17 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 18 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 19 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 20 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 21 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 22 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 23 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 24 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 25 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 26 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 27 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 28 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 29 of 30Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 30 of 30
exv4w14






EXHIBIT 4.14




March 1, 2011




Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549




Re: Brookfield Homes Corporation




Ladies and Gentlemen:



In accordance with Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, Brookfield Homes Corporation (the
“Registrant”) has not filed herewith any instrument with respect to long-term debt not being
registered where the total number of securities authorized thereunder does not exceed ten percent
(10%) of the total assets of the Registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The
Registrant hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any such agreement to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request.



Sincerely,




	 	 	 	 	 
	BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION

 	 	 
	/s/ CRAIG J. LAURIE
 	 	 
	Craig J. Laurie 	 	 
	Chief Financial Officer
Development of Chemical Precipitation Purchased Equipment Costs:

Clarifiers

Purchased Equipment Costs are the sum of the following cost elements:

(1) Pump Costs

(2) Tank Costs

(3) Chemical Feed System Costs

(4) Mixer Costs

(5) Clarifier Costs

(6) Filter Press Costs

(7) Sand Filter Costs

Legend

Each cost component includes the cost of freight and associated ancillary equipment such as piping, valves, and 

controllers.

This Excel workbook supports EPA's derivation of cost element (5) using information provided by vendors.

The following worksheet presents the calculation of clarifier tank volume based on vendor provided information. Clarifier 

tank volume was used to develop purchase costs for the clarifier tank. Walker Process Equipment provided tank diameter 

and height for two FGD Wastewater Flows which were used to calculate tank volume and to develop a relationship 

between flow rate and tank volume. EPA then used the relationship to extrapolate tank volumes for the other clarifier flow 

rates, provided by Siemens.

Vendor provided information. Refer to DCN SE01825.A32 for the source for these data.

Vendor provided information. Refer to DCN SE01825.A30 for the source of these data.
 valves, and 

nformation. Clarifier 

rovided tank diameter 

 a relationship 

he other clarifier flow 

ce for these data.

ce of these data.
FGD Wastewater Flow, gpm Diameter, ft Height, ft Volume, cu ft Volume, gal

30 15 12.5 2208.932335 16523

75 20 13.5 4241.150082 31724

100 12 40168.8

140 14 53680.8

250 18 90838.8

350 22 124618.8

470 26 165154.8

550 28 192178.8

700 32 242848.8

y = 337.8x + 6388.8

R2 = 1

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

V

olume, gal

FGD Wastewater Flow, gpm

Clarifier Tank Volume vs. FGD Wastewater 

Flow
No. 09-9544.

#### James Clinton McCorvey, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1079, 130 S. Ct. 2118,

176 L. Ed. 2d 743,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3375.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 09-809.

#### Thomas Eames, et al., Petitioners v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company.

559 U.S. 1006, 130 S. Ct. 1884,

176 L. Ed. 2d 363,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2565.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 346 Fed. Appx. 859.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000837893
<NAME> 88APP
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         323,271
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   87,732
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               411,003
<PP&E>                                       4,854,930
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,652,305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,613,628
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,463
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,600,165
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,613,628
<SALES>                                        495,753
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               508,281
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  619,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (111,304)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (111,304)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (111,304)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (9.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 42 (Thursday, March 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4724]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2493-084-WA]


Puget Sound Energy, Inc.; Notice of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

February 27, 2009.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47879), the Office 
of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for an amendment of 
license for the Snoqualmie Falls Hydroelectric Project, located on the 
Snoqualmie River in the City of Snoqualmie, King County, Washington, 
and has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) on the proposed 
amendment.
    A copy of the EA is on file with the Commission and is available 
for public inspection. The EA may also be viewed on the Commission's 
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the 
docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number 
field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online 
Support at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c78182958488a9abaea9a294b2b7b7a8b5b387a1a2b5a4e9a0a8b1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0d4b485f4e4263616463685e787d7d627f794d6b687f6e236a627b">[email protected]</span></a> or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676, 
or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.
    Any comments should be filed within 30 days from the issuance date 
of this notice, and should be addressed to the Secretary, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Room 1-A, 
Washington, DC 20426. Please reference the project name and project 
number (Snoqualmie Falls Hydroelectric Project No. 2493-084) on all 
comments. Comments may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu 
of paper. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. See 18 
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web 
site under the ``eFiling'' link. For further information, contact Linda 
Stewart at (202) 502-6680.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-4724 Filed 3-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>




                  EXHIBIT 23.1 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Tricord Systems, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-65784, 33-76532 and 333-04701)
of our reports, which include an explanatory paragraph related to the Company's
change in business focus for 1997, dated February 18, 1997, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Tricord
Systems, Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for the years ended December
31, 1996, 1995, 1994, which reports are included or incorporated by reference in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                                  COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 28, 1997
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10612-10613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5150]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Final Environmental Impact Statement; Wetland and Creek 
Restoration at Big Lagoon Golden Gate National Recreation Area; Marin 
County, California; Notice of Approval of Record of Decision

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act 
of 1969 (Pub. L. 91-190, as amended) and the regulations promulgated by 
the Council on Environmental Quality (40 CFR1505.2), the Department of 
the Interior, National Park Service has prepared and approved a Record 
of Decision for the Final Environmental Impact Statement (Final EIS) 
for Wetland and Creek Restoration at Big Lagoon, Golden Gate National 
Recreation Area. The requisite no-action ``wait period'' was initiated 
December 21, 2007, with the Environmental Protection Agency's Federal 
Register notification of the filing of the Final EIS.
    Decision: As soon as practical Golden Gate National Recreation 
Area, in cooperation with the County of Marin, will begin to implement 
restoration strategies and park and area improvements identified and 
analyzed as the Preferred Alternative presented in the Final EIS (with 
minor modifications from the course of action as presented in the EIS, 
based upon final consultations with partner agencies). The full range 
of foreseeable environmental consequences was assessed, and appropriate 
mitigation measures identified. Both a No Action alternative and 
multiple ``action'' alternatives were identified and analyzed (three 
restoration alternatives, six public access alternatives, four bridge 
alternatives, and five fill disposal

[[Page 10613]]

alternatives). The selected alternative was deemed to be the 
``environmentally preferred'' course of action.
    Copies: Interested parties desiring to review the Record of 
Decision may obtain a copy by contacting the Superintendent, Golden 
Gate National Recreation Area, Building 201, Fort Mason, San Francisco, 
CA 94123 or via telephone request at (415) 561-2841.

    Dated: November 25, 2008.
Jonathan B. Jarvis,
Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
 [FR Doc. E9-5150 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P