alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
410 P.2d 682

#### GARBAGE SERVICE COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant, v. The ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, and A. P. (Jack) Buzard, John P. Clark and E. T. (Eddie) Williams, Jr., as members of and constituting said Commission, Appellees.

No. 1 CA-CIV 107.

Court of Appeals of Arizona.

Jan. 28, 1966.

Rehearing Denied Deb. 24, 1966.

Review Denied March 22, 1966.

Minne & Sorenson, by Richard Minne, Phoenix, for appellant.

Darrell F. Smith, Atty. Gen., Phoenix, by Sidney M. Rosen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees.

CAMERON, Judge.

This is a companion case to Cochise Sanitary Service v. Corporation Commission, 2 Ariz.App. 559, 410 P.2d *677*(1966), filed this day.

The appellant, Garbage Service Company, a corporation, raises the additional question that the trial court, in dismissing appellant’s complaint, deprived appellant of property without due process of law, and denied appellant the equal protection of the law.

The facts are similar to Cochise Sanitary Service v. Corporation Commission, supra, in that prior to 24 April, 1964, Garbage Service Company had a certificate of convenience and necessity to operate as a common carrier transporting, for compensation, *565garbage, trash, refuse, junk and waste material. On 21 February, 1964, the Commission issued its order to show cause, and after hearing, on 24 April, 1964, the Commission entered its written decision and order revoking appellant’s certificate of convenience and necessity. After timely application for an order to vacate and for rehearing, appellant, Garbage Service Company, pursuant to the provisions of A.R.S. Section 40-254, instituted this action in the Superior Court of Maricopa County, and sought to have the decision and order of the Arizona Corporation Commission vacated and set aside. Appellee, Corporation Commission, moved to dismiss the complaint which was granted, and Garbage Service Company brings this appeal.

We feel and therefore hold, that Visco v. State, 95 Ariz. 154, 388 P.2d 155 (1963), is controlling in the instant case. For a more complete statement of our reasoning, see Cochise Sanitary Service v. Corporation Commission, supra.

Appellant contends that there has not been a complete consideration of the questions purportedly ruled upon in Visco v. State, supra, questions which appellant submits were not properly before the court. Appellant would urge that the lower court should consider, not only the questions in its case, but also to completely re-examine the fact situation in Visco v. State, supra. Failing to do this, appellant contends that he has not been afforded the opportunity for a fair hearing or that he has been deprived of property without due process of law or equal protection of the law.

With this we cannot agree. While it is true that the appellant was not a party in the matter of Visco v. State, supra, the law is applicable to appellant, and we believe that his case cannot be distinguished upon the facts presented to this court, from the facts presented to the court in Visco v. State, supra. For that reason, the judgment is affirmed.

STEVENS, C. J., and DONOFRIO, J., concurring.
STATE of North Carolina v. Melvin Lee WHITE, Jr.

No. 505P96-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Kristin D. Parks, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Melvin L. White, For White, Melvin Lee, Jr.

L. Michael Dodd, Special Deputy Attorney General, Scott E. Thomas, District Attorney, For State of N.C.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 12th of September 2018 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Craven County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."
MARTIN v. CITY OF COLLEGE PARK.

A17A0032

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

March 28, 2019

Christopher Dean Balch, Atlanta, Matthew Carl Billips, Decatur, for Appellant.

Winston A. Denmark, Steven Martin Fincher, Emilia Cassandra Walker, Jonesboro, Michael Joseph Williams, for Appellee.

Doyle, Chief Judge.

In *Martin v. City of College Park* ,1 we affirmed in part and reversed in part the grant of summary judgment to defendant City of College Park. After granting certiorari review, the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed this Court's judgment and remanded the case for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion.2 Accordingly, we vacate our earlier opinion and adopt the judgment of the Supreme Court. The judgment of the trial court is vacated, and the case is remanded.

*Judgment vacated and case remanded with direction.*

Miller, P.J., and Reese, J., concur.

1

342 Ga. App. 289, 802 S.E.2d 292 (2017).

2

See *City of College Park v. Martin* , 304 Ga. 488, 491, 818 S.E.2d 620 (2018).
Rozina WADHWANIA, M.D. v. WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER

No. 449P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Kristine M. Sims, William J. McMahon, IV, Attorneys at Law, for Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center.

Rozina Wadwania, for Wadhwania, Rozina.

William J. McMahon, Attorney at Law, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 27th of December 2018 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly report of Zaldiva, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), We,
Robert B. Lees, President, and John A. Palmer, Jr., Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Dated: 5-10-04                       /s/Robert B. Lees
       -------                       -----------------
                                     Robert B. Lees
                                     President

Dated: 5/11/04                       /s/John A. Palmer, Jr.
       -------                       ----------------------
                                     John A. Palmer, Jr.
                                     Treasurer
                                     Director
#### H. E. Goolsby, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed March 26, 1928.

*B. E. Bradley*and *L. L. Campbell,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Fred II. Davis,*Attorney General, and *Boy Campbell,*Assistant, for the State.

*530Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties; and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
No. 09-1026.

#### Herbert S. Moncier, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1038, 130 S. Ct. 2078,

176 L. Ed. 2d 416,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2849.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 571 F.3d 593.
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tempco, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Kimberly Conley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  By:/s/ Kimberly ConleyKimberly Conley
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)  Dated:October 15, 2012
Toni DAY, Employee, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, Employer, and American Insurance Group Plan, Carrier, Defendants (Administered by Sedgwick, CMS).

No. COA18-1125

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 4, 2019

AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Matthew Garret MCMAHAN, Defendant.

No. COA18-672

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 4, 2019

VACATED.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. §1350



In connection with the quarterly report of Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Alan P. Niedzwiecki, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This Certification has not been, and shall not be
deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.



Date: September 9, 2005



/S/ ALAN P. NIEDZWIECKIAlan P. Niedzwiecki President and Chief Executive
Officer
5 December 2013 ***************************

NSN: 8940-01-545-4865 (NSF) * MONOGRAPH NO: FS3-09

 ***************************

Item: Nuts with raw sunflower kernels and infused fruit (Type III)

Document: PCR-N-003, Nut and Fruit Mix, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 310 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Free flowing mixture of nuts (coated peanuts, coated walnuts, almonds), raw sunflower 

kernels, and infused fruits. Free of clumped ingredients that cannot be broken with 

light finger pressure. Off-white to gray raw sunflower kernels, uniform dark blue to 

purple blueberries, uniform cranberry-red cranberries, uniform bright red cherries.

Odor: Unsalted, shelled, roasted peanuts, walnuts, raw sunflower seed kernels, almonds, and 

infused fruit (blueberries, cranberries, and cherries).

Flavor: Unsalted, shelled, roasted peanuts, walnuts, raw sunflower seed kernels, almonds, and 

infused fruit (sweet wild blueberry; tart, sweet cranberry; and sweet cherry).

Texture: Firm to crunchy nuts; firm, not brittle or soggy raw sunflower kernels; moist, chewy 

infused fruit.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: All components darkened or clumped together. Nuts and sunflower kernels crushed or 

broken.

Odor: Stale, rancid nuts or sunflower kernels.

Flavor: Stale, rancid nuts or sunflower kernels.

Texture: Soft nuts. Brittle or soggy sunflower kernels. Dry, hard infused fruit.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Product is considered serviceable if clumps of nuts, sunflower kernels and infused fruits can be broken 

with light finger pressure.

Special Notes

This product pouch shall be nitrogen flushed or contain an oxygen scavenger. If defect such as 

oxidized or rancid odors or flavors exist, they are likely due to package failure or the absence of an 

oxygen scavenger. There may be some loose and/or detached skins and peanut splits.
5 December 2013 ***************************

NSN: 8940-01-545-4865 (NSF) * MONOGRAPH NO: FS3-09

 ***************************
April 27 , 2015

Mr. Robert McArtor

RE/MAX Components

1301 Marquis Court

Fallston, MD 21047

Dear Mr. McArtor :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your January 29, 2015 exemption request on behalf of the RE/MAX Components

into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0212 ) , but we are unable to process your request any

further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and th e extent of

the relief you seek

.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; th at is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exempti on.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 4264

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Dan Ngo

Program Analyst

, Aircraft and

Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
No. D-2607.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Theodore Q. Thompson.

565 U.S. 1052, 132 S. Ct. 809,

181 L. Ed. 2d 520,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8367.

November 28, 2011.

Theodore Q. Thompson, of Blue Bell, Pennsylvania, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Alaska Administrative Code Title 

Environmental Conservation, Chapt

Fuel Requirements for Motor Vehi

 (18 AAC 53)
No. 09-9532.

#### Fred Erby, Petitioner v. C. Bennett, et al.

559 U.S. 1111, 130 S. Ct. 2412,

176 L. Ed. 2d 932,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3679.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Justin M. JONES, Plaintiff, v. Paula JONES, Defendant, v. Cora F. Edwards Mills, Intervenor.

No. COA18-991

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 16, 2019

AFFIRMED.
No. 09-9072.

#### John H. Dillard, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1021, 130 S. Ct. 1922,

176 L. Ed. 2d 391,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2450.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 354 Fed. Appx. 852.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  1)
    
    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months
ended September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2)
    
    the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the three months ended September 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Plumas
Bancorp.
 Date:  November 2, 2009
    /s/ Andrew RybackAndrew J. Ryback, Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-9196.

#### Rickey Sabedra, Petitioner v. United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

559 U.S. 1090, 130 S. Ct. 2398,

176 L. Ed. 2d 764,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3485.

April 26, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, *765and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Exhibit 32.1

     Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 1350


     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Dover
Petroleum Corp. (the "Company")for the quarter ending September 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.


Date: January 15, 2004             /s/ Robert Salna


                                   Robert Salna, Principal Financial
                                   Officer



     The foregoing certification accompanied the Quarterly Report on
Form 10QSB filing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is being
reproduced herein for information only.  It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company, whether made before or after hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.  A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with the quarterly report of West Bancorporation, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2020 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David D. Nelson, Chief Executive Officer and President of West Bancorporation, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of West Bancorporation, Inc.








July 23, 2020








/s/ David D. Nelson


David D. Nelson


Chief Executive Officer and President
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 42 (Thursday, March 5, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 9565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4653]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 42 / Thursday, March 5, 2009 / Rules 
and Regulations

[[Page 9565]]



FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

11 CFR Parts 100, 104, and 110

[Notice 2009-07]


Reporting Contributions Bundled by Lobbyists, Registrants and the 
PACs of Lobbyists and Registrants

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Election Commission is correcting a compliance 
date that appeared in the Federal Register of February 17, 2009 (74 FR 
7285). The document issued the final rules regarding the disclosure of 
information about bundled contributions provided by certain lobbyists, 
registrants and political committees established or controlled by 
lobbyists and registrants.

DATES: This correction is effective March 19, 2009. The final rule 
published on February 17, 2009 remains effective on March 19, 2009, and 
the compliance date for paragraphs (b) and (e) of 11 CFR 104.22 remains 
May 18, 2009. However, political committees that are ``lobbyist/
registrant PACs'' must amend their FEC Form 1 (Statement of 
Organization) by March 29, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy L. Rothstein, Assistant 
General Counsel, Ms. Cheryl A.F. Hemsley, or Ms. Esther Heiden, 
Attorneys, 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20463, (202) 694-1650 or 
(800) 424-9530.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission is publishing this document 
to correct an error that appeared in FR Doc. E9-2838, on page 7285 in 
the Federal Register of Tuesday, February 17, 2009 (74 FR 7285). The 
correction is as follows:

DATES: [Corrected]
    On page 7285, in the first column, in the DATES section, the 
deadline for lobbyist/registrant PACs to amend their FEC Form 1 
(Statement of Organization) is corrected to read as follows: 
``Political committees that are ``lobbyist/registrant PACs'' must amend 
their FEC Form 1 (Statement of Organization) by March 29, 2009.''

    On behalf of the Commission,

    Dated: February 27, 2009.
Steven T. Walther,
Chairman, Federal Election Commission.
 [FR Doc. E9-4653 Filed 3-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
Exhibit 10.45

 

AMENDMENT #7

 

To Letter of Intent for Proposed CRADA #2166

 

“Preclinical and Clinical Development of [*]”

 

The purpose of this Amendment is to change certain terms of the Letter of Intent (LOI) for the proposed Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) entitled “Preclinical and Clinical Development of [*].” These changes are reflected below, and except for these changes, all other provisions of the original CRADA LOI remain in full force and effect. Two originals of this Amendment are provided for execution; one is to remain with the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the other original is to remain with the Collaborator.

 

Upon final signature, the term of the CRADA Letter of Intent is extended for six months from November 23, 2010 to, May 23, 2011.

 

 

	
ACCEPTED   AND AGREED TO:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
For   the National Cancer Institute:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/   Douglas R. Lowy
    	
 
    	
11/26/10
    
	
Douglas   R. Lowy, M.D.
    	
 
    	
Date
    
	
Deputy   Director, NCI
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
For   NewLink Genetics Corporation:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/   Nicholas Vahanian
    	
 
    	
1/12/10
    
	
Nicholas   Vahanian, M.D.
    	
 
    	
Date
    
	
Chief   Operating Officer