alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AFS-14-410-E

 Exemption No. 12019

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0590

Mr. Chris Berg

School Director

Hillsboro Aviation, Inc. 

3565 NE Cornell Road

Hillsboro, OR 97124

Dear Mr. Berg:

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our 

decision and explains its basis.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated August 7, 2014, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Hillsboro Aviation, Inc. for an exemption from § 61.156 of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to enable Chinese national citizens enrolled in 

its approved part 141 pilot school program to apply for the FAA airline transport pilot (ATP) 

multiengine airplane knowledge test, without completing the academic and flight simulation 

training device (FSTD) requirements prescribed in § 61.156.

The FAA issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 11196 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that exempting pilots from the training requirements of § 61.156 would not provide an 

equivalent level of safety. The FAA noted that, as of August 1, 2014, completion of the ATP 

Certificate Training Program (CTP) is required to be eligible to take the ATP multiengine

airplane knowledge test. The FAA found that, although the petitioner’s part 141 approved 

training program contains many of the elements required by § 61.156, it is not an approved 

course of training for the ATP CTP. The FAA has determined that the additional training 

required for the multiengine airplane ATP certificate will better prepare a pilot for flying in 
2

the airline environment and will improve safety and that exempting pilots from training that 

improves safety is not in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that —

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed 

denial of exemption; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113, and 44701 which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, the petition of Hillsboro Aviation, Inc. for an exemption 

from 14 CFR § 61.156 is hereby denied.

Sincerely,

/s/

John Barbagallo

Deputy Director, Flight Standards Services
**Exhibit
      23.1**




CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
    We
        have
        issued our report dated October 13, 2005 on the consolidated balance sheets
        of
 American
        Health Products Corporation and Subsidiary as of June 30, 2005 and 2004,
        and
 the
        related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity,
        and cash
 flows
        of
        American Health Products Corporation and Subsidiary for the three years
        ended
 June
        30,
        2005, included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June
        30,
 2005,
        filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  We hereby consent
        to
        the
 incorporation
        by reference of our report in the company’s previously filed
        Registration
 Statement
        Nos. 333-28002 and 333-81411.
   /S/
        Grant
        Thornton LLP
      Chicago,
        Illinois
 October
        14, 2005
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  1)
    
    such Quarter Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months
ended September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    the information contained in such Quarter Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the three months ended September 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Plumas
Bancorp.
 Date:  November 9, 2005

/s/ D. N. BiddleDouglas N. Biddle, Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5132]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, March 
12, 2009 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(5), 
(7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at 
the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Paredes, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
March 12, 2009 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature;
an adjudicatory matter; and
other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: March 5, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-5132 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
NOONSAB v. STATE of NC

131P16-11

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2019

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Somchai Noonsab, Somchoi Noorsob, for Noonsab, Somchai.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th of May 2019 by Defendant to Dismiss of Judicial Notice:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."
No. 09-9175.

#### Mary P. Thomas, Petitioner v. Tom Marola, et al.

559 U.S. 1053, 130 S. Ct. 2353,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3067.

176 L. Ed. 2d 569,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5155]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PRESIDIO TRUST


Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: The Presidio Trust.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 103(c)(6) of the Presidio Trust Act, 16 
U.S.C. 460bb appendix, and in accordance with the Presidio Trust's 
bylaws, notice is hereby given that a public meeting of the Presidio 
Trust Board of Directors will be held commencing 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday, 
April 7, 2009, at the Herbst International Exhibition Hall, 385 Moraga 
Avenue, San Francisco, California. The Presidio Trust was created by 
Congress in 1996 to manage approximately eighty percent of the former 
U.S. Army base known as the Presidio, in San Francisco, California.
    The purposes of this meeting are to provide an Executive Director's 
report, to receive public comment on the revised Draft Presidio Trust 
Management Plan Main Post Update and Draft Supplement to the 
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, and to receive public 
comment on other matters in accordance with the Presidio Trust's Public 
Outreach Policy.
    Individuals requiring special accommodation at this meeting, such 
as needing a sign language interpreter, should contact Mollie Matull at 
415.561.5300 prior to March 27, 2009.

DATES: The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday, April 7, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Herbst International 
Exhibition Hall, 385 Moraga Avenue, San Francisco, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Cook, General Counsel, the 
Presidio Trust, 34 Graham Street, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, 
California 94129-0052, Telephone: 415.561.5300.

    Dated: March 5, 2009.
Karen A. Cook,
General Counsel.
 [FR Doc. E9-5155 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4R-P
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4786 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

535 Wood Street in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘H. Gordon Payrow 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2006 

Mr. DENT (for himself, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. 

ENGLISH of Pennsylvania, Ms. HART, Mr. PETERSON of Pennsylvania, 

Mr. GERLACH, Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania, Mr. FITZPATRICK of Pennsylvania, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. SHERWOOD, Mr. KANJORSKI, Mr. MURTHA, 

Ms. SCHWARTZ of Pennsylvania, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. PITTS, Mr. HOLDEN, 

Mr. MURPHY, and Mr. PLATTS) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 535 Wood Street in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 

as the ‘‘H. Gordon Payrow Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. H. GORDON PAYROW POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 535 Wood Street in Bethlehem, 

6 Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘H. 

7 Gordon Payrow Post Office Building’’. 


wwhite on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4786 IH 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘H. Gordon Payrow 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


wwhite on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
SHALLOTTE PARTNERS, LLC v. BERKADIA COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE, LLC and Samet Corporation

No. 14P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Fenton T. Erwin, Jr., Lex M. Erwin, Attorneys at Law, Charlotte, For Shallotte Partners, LLC

D. Kyle Deak, Raleigh, Sarah C. Boshears, Durham, Attorneys at Law, For Berkadia Commercial Mortgage, LLC

J. Michael Thomas, Donald G. Sparrow, Peyton D. Mansure, Greensboro, Attorneys at Law, For Samet Corporation

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th of January 2019 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
No. 09-9691.

#### Adam Michael Bauer, Petitioner v. Michigan.

559 U.S. 1099, 130 S. Ct. 2387,

176 L. Ed. 2d 779,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3507.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Circuit Court of Michigan, Kent County, denied.
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
      undersigned, Donald Neal, President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, and
      Treasurer of American Goldfields Inc. (the “Company”), certifies, under the
      standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
      knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
      ended October 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that
      Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and  results  of operations of the Company.








Date:
                December  14, 2007
              
              
              /s/
                Donald Neal
              ---------------------
              Donald
                Neal
              President,
                Chief Executive Officer,
              Secretary,
                and Treasurer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer,
              Principal
                Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting
                Officer)








This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
No. 08-1458.

#### Missouri Gas Energy, Petitioner v. Monica Schmidt, Woods County, Oklahoma, Assessor.

559 U.S. 1087, 130 S. Ct. 2141,

176 L. Ed. 2d 758,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3176.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 970, 130 S. Ct. 1685, 176 L. Ed. 2d 179, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 2087.
In the MATTER OF: E.D.

No. 125PA18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2019

Wyatt B. Orsbon, Assistant Appellant Defender, for E.D.

Robert T. Broughton, Assistant Attorney General, Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Respondent on the 7th of June 2019 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Wake County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of June 2019."

Davis, J. recused
#### Mary H. Hubbs and Lewis T. Hubbs, Her Husband, *Plaintiffs in Error,*v. The City of Winter Haven, a Municipal Corporation, Organized and Existing Under the Laws of the State of Florida, *Defendants in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February 1, 1928.

Petition for Rehearing Denied February 24, 1928.

*Huff alter & Edwards,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*Don Register,*for Defendant in Error.

*115Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in' the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeWorking With DLAApplicationsDetails

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# GEX - Global Exchange

For access to GEX fill out the System Access Request **For access to GEX fill out the System Access Request: https://home.daas.dla.mil/sar

## GEX Information

Global Exchange (GEX) provides access for Defense Automatic Addressing System (DAAS) customers to apply for automated machine-to-machine accounts. Roles and permissions are set within GEX by DAAS eBusiness administrators to limit access for each account to only data/transactions directly related to their DoD customers and prime vendors. To proceed, you must have an agreement or MOU with DAAS GEX, and have been directed to this page by a DAAS GEX administrator.*Note: GEX was formerly known as Defense eBusiness Exchange (DEBX).*

----

## Assistance and Contact Information

If you do not have an agreement/MOU please contact edi@dla.mil to initiate the agreement process for GEX access and/or further instructions.

### DAAS Help Desk (DAAS Customers)

Help desk is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week

Phone Number:** (614) 692-6672DSN Number:** (312) 850-6672EMAIL:** itoc@dla.mil

GEXGlobal ExchangeDAASInformation Operations
No. 09-7176.

#### Willie Frank King, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 964, 130 S. Ct. 1574,

176 L. Ed. 2d 156,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1039.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1058, 130 S. Ct. 762, 175 L. Ed. 2d 531, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 8661.
IN RE: N.S.J., N.S.J., S.S.J., E.O.J., III All Minor Juveniles.

No. COA18-1005

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 7, 2019

AFFIRMED.
Director Compensation Policy



 Exhibit 10.18 
 Director Compensation Policy 
 For 2011, the payment structure is as
follows for our independent directors: 
  

	 	•	 	 $20,000 one-time restricted stock grant to new non-employee Board members vesting in three equal annual installments (subject to continued service as a
director, other than due to death or disability); 


  

	 	•	 	 $10,000 cash to each non-employee Board member as one-third of the annual director fee; 



 

	 	•	 	 $20,000 annual restricted stock grant to each non-employee Board member as two-thirds of the annual director fee, granted at the annual meeting and
vesting on the day before the next annual meeting (subject to continued service as a director, other than due to death or disability); 


  

	 	•	 	 $10,000 cash to the Lead Director as an annual fee; 


  

	 	•	 	 $10,000 cash to the Audit Committee Chairman as an annual fee; 



 

	 	•	 	 $5,000 cash to the Compensation Committee Chairman as an annual fee; 



 

	 	•	 	 $5,000 cash to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairman as an annual fee; 



 

	 	•	 	 $2,500 cash to Audit Committee members as an annual fee; 



 

	 	•	 	 $7,000 cash to each non-employee director for each Board meeting attended in person if the Board meeting is held in the director’s home country or
$9,000 cash to each non-employee director for each Board meeting attended in person, if the meeting is not held in the director’s home country. The $7,000 and $9,000 fee is a flat fee that is payable only once per meeting, no matter how long
the meeting lasts; 


  

	 	•	 	 $1,250 cash for each Board meeting attended telephonically; 



 

	 	•	 	 $1,000 cash for all committee meetings attended in person by a non-employee Board member (if there is more than one meeting per day or per visit , the
$1,000 covers all meetings). Committee meetings held during in person Board meetings are not subject to payment; 


  

	 	•	 	 $1,000 cash per day for non-employee Directors when working or traveling on a specific assignment required by the Board, that is not part of a Board
meeting; 


  

	 	•	 	 $500 cash for all committee meetings attended telephonically per day by a non-employee Board member; and 



 

	 	•	 	 $0 for informational or update calls. 


 At this time, the Board has determined that all of our non-employee directors are also independent directors. In the event that new directors join our Board who are not employees but who do not qualify as
independent, the Board may revisit this compensation structure as it applies to non-employee directors who are not independent. 

Our non-employee directors are eligible to participate in our Deferred Compensation Plan pursuant to which they may elect to defer their
fees, which are invested in mutual funds. Through March 31, 2009, the Company matched 50% of the participant’s contribution up to an annual maximum of $12,500, which is invested in shares of Company common stock acquired in the open market
and those shares become subject to vesting provisions. The company match was suspended in March 2009.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra,
      Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, Clive Ng, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and will be retained by China
      Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





May
        25,
        2007






*/s/ Clive
                  Ng*Clive
                  Ng*(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and
                  Financial Officer)*




41
No. 09M94.

#### Justin Endicott, Petitioner v. Icicle Seafoods, Inc.

560 U.S. 902,130 S. Ct. 3311,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1180,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4010.

May 17, 2010.

Motion for leave to proceed as a seaman granted.