alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-70468 and 333-146223 on Forms S-8 and
Registration Statement No. 333-140018 on Form S-3 of our reports dated December 12, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Innovative
Solutions and Support, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company"), and the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended September 30, 2007.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
December 12, 2007

---



QuickLinks
STATE EX REL. UTILITIES COMMISSION v. ATTORNEY GENERAL

401A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 15, 2019

Jennifer T. Harrod, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, For Stein, Josh (Attorney General)

Matthew W. Sawchak, Raleigh, Solicitor General, For Stein, Josh (Attorney General)

Teresa L. Townsend, Assistant Attorney General, For Stein, Josh (Attorney General)

Margaret A. Force, Assistant Attorney General, For Stein, Josh (Attorney General)

James W. Doggett, Deputy Solicitor General, For Stein, Josh (Attorney General)

Kiran H. Mehta, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, For Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC

Christopher G. Browning, Jr., Raleigh, Attorney at Law, For Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC

Molly McIntosh Jagannathan, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, For Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC

Matthew D. Quinn, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, For Sierra Club

Peter H. Ledford, Attorney at Law, For N.C. Sustainable Energy Association

Benjamin Smith, Regulatory Counsel, For N.C. Sustainable Energy Association

Gudrun Thompson, Attorney at Law, For N.C. Justice Center, et al.

David L. Neal, Attorney at Law, For N.C. Justice Center, et al.

David T. Drooz, Staff Attorney, For N.C. Utilities Commission-Public Staff

Lucy E. Edmondson, Raleigh, Staff Attorney, For N.C. Utilities Commission-Public Staff

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th of April 2019 to admit Bridget M. Lee Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of April 2019."
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of AKI, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
period  ending  March  31,  2004 as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  we, William J. Fox and Kenneth A.
Budde, the Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer,  respectively,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of AKI, Inc.



/s/ William J. Fox
-----------------------
William J. Fox
Chief Executive Officer
May 7, 2004

/s/ Kenneth A. Budde
-----------------------
Kenneth A. Budde
Chief Financial Officer
May 7, 2004


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 09-8477.

#### Qian Chen, Petitioner v. Ricardo S. Martinez, Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Washington.

559 U.S. 1089, 130 S. Ct. 2146,

176 L. Ed. 2d 764,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3152.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 957, 130 S. Ct. 1570, 176 L. Ed. 2d 143, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 1253.
Order filed February 28, 2014

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00251

- CV

____________ ADVANCED PERSONAL CA RE, LLC , Appellant

V. JACQUELYN CHURCHILL, EVERETT CHURCHILL AN D JED, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 269th Dist rict Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 04324



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed June 3, 2013. Our review has determined that a
relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain any request for a reporter's record, including any statement of points or issues under Rule 34.6 (c).The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s

record on or before March 7, 2014, containing any request for a re porter's record, including any statement of points or issues under Rule 34.6 (c).
If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted
item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

133295 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver & (19) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 133295 COA: 274849 Genesee CC: 06-018000-FC DENNIS WAYNE VAN CLEVE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of July 30, 2007, the prosecut ing attorney was dir ected to answer the application for leave to appeal the January 18, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the answer having been received, the appli cation for leave to appeal is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302 (G)(1), in lieu of gran ting leave to appeal,
we REMAND this case to the Genesee Circu it Court for resentencing. Because the penetrations in this case did not “arise out of” the sentencing offense, OV 11 should not have been scored at 50 points. People v Johnson , 474 Mich 96 (2006).

l0917 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 24, 2007

Clerk
No. 09M72.

#### Larry Patterson, Petitioner v. Brion D. Travis, et al.

559 U.S. 989, 130 S. Ct. 1753,

176 L. Ed. 2d 209,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2339.

March 8, 2010.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-20704

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

REYNALDO CHAVEZ-VILLEGAS, also known as Reynaldo Villegas Chavez,

also known as Reynaldo Chavez Villegas,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CR-338-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Reynaldo ChavezVillegas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Chavez-Villegas has filed a response. We have reviewed

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well

as Chavez-Villegas’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-20704 Document: 00512347383 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
No. 12-20704

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 12-20704 Document: 00512347383 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
No. 09-8997.

#### Eric Thomas, Petitioner v. Derral G. Adams, Warden, et al.

559 U.S. 1073, 130 S. Ct. 2099,

176 L. Ed. 2d 731,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3386.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 09-9883.

#### DeCarlos Smith, Petitioner v. Helen J. Marberry, Warden.

559 U.S. 1112, 130 S. Ct. 2419,

176 L. Ed. 2d 934,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3773.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
          connection with the Transitional Report of Panda
          Ethanol ,
          Inc. a
          Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
          December
          31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
          hereof (the "Report"), Todd W. Carter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
          certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
          as
          adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
          The
          Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
          The
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  A
          signed
          original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
          to
          Panda Ethanol, Inc., and will be retained by Panda Ethanol, Inc. and furnished
          to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
   /s/ Todd
                    W.
                    CarterTodd
                        W. Carter
                      Chief
                        Executive Officer
                      November
                        15, 2006
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the annual report of Patriot Scientific Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended May 31, 2004, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification
      is
      an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of Patriot Scientific
      Corporation does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      October 16, 2006


/s/
                  Thomas J. Sweeney
                
                Thomas
                  J. Sweeney
                *Chief
                  Financial Officer*
Exhibit 18.1

March
20, 2002

Key
Production Company, Inc.
Denver, Colorado

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

We
have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Key Production Company, Inc. (the "Company") as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2001, and have reported thereon under date of March 6, 2002. The
aforementioned consolidated financial statements and our audit report thereon are included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
As stated in the accompanying summary of significant accounting policies included in those financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for amortization of capitalized costs from
the future gross revenue method to the units-of-production method, and states that the newly adopted accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances because the
units-of-production method results in a better matching of the costs of oil and gas production against the related revenue received in periods of volatile prices for production
as have been experienced in recent periods. Additionally, the units-of-production method is the predominant method used by full cost companies in the oil and gas industry,
accordingly, the change improves the comparability of the Company's financial statements with its peer group. In accordance with your request, we have reviewed and discussed with Company officials the
circumstances and business judgment and planning upon which the decision to make this change in the method of accounting was based.

With
regard to the aforementioned accounting change, authoritative criteria have not been established for evaluating the preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over another acceptable
method. However, for purposes of the Company's compliance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are furnishing this letter.

Based
on our review and discussion, with reliance on management's business judgment and planning, we concur that the newly adopted method of accounting is preferable in the Company's circumstances.

Very
truly yours,

KPMG
LLP

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1
================================================================================
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                             ----------------------

                                  FORM 10-K/A


                       AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION OR REPORT

               FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12, 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
                        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



                              ORYX ENERGY COMPANY

             (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)




                                AMENDMENT NO. 1


The undersigned Registrant hereby amends the following items of its Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, as set forth
in the pages attached hereto:

              Part IV.    Item 14.     Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules 
                                       and Reports on Form 8-K

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this amendment to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                          Oryx Energy Company

                                   By:    /s/  EDWARD W. MONEYPENNY
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                          Edward W. Moneypenny
                                          Executive Vice President, Finance, and
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          (Principal Financial Officer)



Date:   May 30, 1997



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
================================================================================

<PAGE>   2

                                    PART IV


ITEM 14.      EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

The Registrant hereby amends Item 14(a) by filing the following exhibit thereto:

    99.1      Form 11-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, of the Oryx
              Energy Company Capital Accumulation Plan
EPA Reg. No. 84229-3 

Vol. 1 – part 2
ODNIHeader2




Print
  ODNI FOIA PORTAL  The goal of the ODNI **Freedom of Information Act** / **Privacy Act** office is to keep the public better informed about the agency’s efforts and to ensure U.S. security through the release of as much information as possible, consistent with the need to protect classified or sensitive information under the exemption provisions of these laws. FOIA RESOURCES:**ODNI Electronic Reading Room**
**ODNI Open Government Plan**
**ODNI FOIA Handbook**
**FOIA Regulations**
**ODNI FOIA Reading Room Certification**
**Other IC FOIA Websites**
**DNI FCGR Memo**
No. 09-9624.

#### Gary L. Adams, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1082, 130 S. Ct. 2126,

176 L. Ed. 2d 748,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3184.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 928.
No. 09-8819.

#### Shannon Andre Peters, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 987, 130 S. Ct. 1727,

176 L. Ed. 2d 205,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1977.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 339 Fed. Appx. 278.
MEMORANDUM

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants, Doc ket Id: OAR–2013-0602 FROM: Sara Ohrel, EPA SUBJECT: May 14, 2015 Meeting on Biogenic Carbon Ac counting with Green Power Institute SUMMARY A meeting was held in person between EPA staff and Green Power Institute staff. The discussion included biogenic carbon accounting in the 2014 EPA Framework for Assessing Biogenic CO2 and related accounting in the Clean Power Plan context. ATTENDEES Green Power Institute Gregg Morris US EPA OAR, OAP, Climate Change Division: Sara Ohrel, Jeff Cole
``

# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of Delta Capital Technologies, Inc., (Registrant) for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (Report), I, Martin Tutschek, chief executive officer and
chief financial officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

|(1) | This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition of Registrant at the end of the period covered
          by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for the period covered by
          this Report.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Martin Tutschek

Martin Tutschek

Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this
Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for
the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This
certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written
statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained
by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
STATE v. Todd Joseph MARTIN

390P12-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Sherri Horner Lawrence, Assistant Attorney General, Scott E. Thomas, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Craig M. Cooley, Attorney at Law, Cary, Todd Joseph Martin, for Martin, Todd Joseph.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd of April 2019 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATE
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18
U.S.C. 1350)
 
 The
undersigned, Julian R. Geiger has executed this certificate in connection with
the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s report
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 3, 2008 (the
“Report”).
 
 The
undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge:
 
 1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”);
and
 
 2. The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 9th
day of June 2008.
 
 /s/
      JULIAN R. GEIGERJulian
      R. GeigerChairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
 
 This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  27
STATE v. Cory Dion BENNETT

406PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 23, 2019

Franklin E. Wells, Jr., Attorney at Law, Asheboro, for Bennett, Cory Dion.

Brent Kiziah, Assistant Attorney General, Ernie Lee, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 22nd of April 2019 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd of April 2019."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 29th day of May 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
No. 09-8586.

#### Richard Ernest Anaya, Petitioner v. California.

559 U.S. 1013, 130 S. Ct. 1894,

176 L. Ed. 2d 375,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2706.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

     Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of West Bancorporation, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas E. Stanberry,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of West Bancorporation, Inc.,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) The report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of West
Bancorporation, Inc.

May 6, 2005

/s/ Thomas E. Stanberry
-----------------------------------------------
Thomas E. Stanberry
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer