alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4504]



[[Page 9258]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1822-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]


Missouri; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Missouri (FEMA-1822-DR), dated February 17, 2009, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 24, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Missouri is hereby amended to include the following 
area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of February 17, 2009.

    Barry County for Public Assistance.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.).

Nancy Ward,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9-4504 Filed 3-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
J

~ '(ED STq T

~
S UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

z ~ Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460



## ~ a

0

PaDZE °S\



### SEP 2 8 2010 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION Donald C. Gadbury Manager, National TRU Program Carlsbad Field Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, NM 88221-3090

Dear Mr. Gadbury:

On June 29, 2010, the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) requested, as a Tier l(T1) change, that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approve 120 additional remote-handled (RH) transuranic (TRU) debris waste containers from Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) alpha gamma hot cells in Building 225 to a previously approved ANL debris waste stream (AERHDM). EPA's review identified that these additional 120 RH containers have the same pedigree as the previously approved RH debris containers belonging to the Waste Stream AERHDM. Therefore, EPA approves the addition of these containers and, as a result, ANL may dispose of this waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). This approval also allows future addition of newly-generated debris waste with a waste pedigree (radiological and physical contents) similar to the previously-approved debris waste stream (AERHDM) by following new Tier 2 change requirements (shown in bold) listed in Table 1 of the enclosed report. The enclosed report (EPA Docket No. A-98-49; II-A4-134) supports EPA's approval decision based on the information reviewed. Please note that in Table 1 of the report, when available, DOE needs to provide actual characterization information so that EPA can review batch data reports for a few EPA-selected RH debris containers from the population reviewed in this approval. If you have any questions regarding this approval, please contact Rajani Joglekar at (202) 343-9462 or Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343-9422.

Sincerely,

Tom Peake, Director Center for Waste Management and fZcLIulations

Enclosure

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov

Recycled/Recyclable . Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30 % Postconsumer)cc: Electronic Distribution

Christine Gelles, DOE EM Alton Harris, DOE EM David Moody, CBFO Ed Ziemianski, CBFO Bill Mackie, CBFO Ava Holland, CBFO QA J R Stroble, CBFO Courtland Fesmire, CBFO Martin Navarrete, CBFO QA Dennis Miehls, CBFO QA D K Ploetz, WTS-CCP Mike Sensibaugh, WTS-CCP Mark Pearcy, WTS-CCP Allison Pangle, CTAC Porf Martinez, CTAC Steve Zappe, NMED
Engagement letter with Davin A.Mackenzie dated December 29, 2009



 Exhibit 10.45 
 December 29, 2009 
 Mr. Davin A. Mackenzie 

[Address] 
  

	 	RE:	  Service on AsiaInfo-Linkage Integration Committee 

 Dear Davin, 
 As we’ve previously discussed, the board of directors (the
“Board”) of AsiaInfo Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) believes that it would be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders for a member of the Board to serve on an integration committee (the
“Integration Committee”) to be formed promptly following the closing of the planned acquisition of Linkage Technologies Investment Limited (“Linkage Technologies”). The Integration Committee will be tasked with
overseeing the integration of the Company and Linkage Technologies into a single functioning company. The Board, in fulfilling its duties to the Company, desires to have significant insight into, and receive regular updates regarding, this
integration process. Accordingly, the Board requests that you serve on the Integration Committee in your role as a member of the Board, which service will commence immediately following the formation of the Integration Committee. 

In recognition of the significant amount of time that you will need to expend in fulfilling your duties as a member of the Integration
Committee, you will receive US$800 in additional Board fees for each hour with the annual cap of US$120,000 that you serve on the Integration Committee. Such hourly fee will be pro-rated on an hourly basis for any partial time during which you serve
on the Integration Committee. You acknowledge that such fees are related solely to your service as a member of the Board, and not pursuant to any separate consulting or other relationship with the Company or the Integration Committee. For the
avoidance of doubt, such fees will be in addition to the annual retainer and Board and committee meeting attendance fees you currently receive with respect to your service as a member of the Board. You will also be reimbursed for your reasonable and
actual out-of-pocket travel expenses incurred when attending meetings of the Integration Committee. 
 It is the intent of the
parties to this letter agreement that you continue to qualify as an “independent director” of the Board in accordance NASDAQ Rule 5605(a) (2) and the provisions of the Board’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. 

This letter agreement will become effective upon the later of the following events: (i) the formation of the Integration Committee,
and (ii) the approval of the form and terms of this letter agreement by the Board, the Compensation Committee of the Board and the Audit Committee of the Board, in each case in accordance with the Board’s Corporate Governance Guidelines
then in effect. 







 
	
	 Sincerely,

	
	 /s/ James Ding

	James Ding
	Chairman of the Board of Directors


  

	
	AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
	
	 /s/ Davin A. Mackenzie

	Mr. Davin A. Mackenzie
	Dated: December 29, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 47 (Thursday, March 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10748-10749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4989]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences, Special Emphasis Panel Sites and Mechanisms of Inhaled 
Anesthetic Actions.
    Date: March 27, 2009.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.

[[Page 10749]]

    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Room 
3AN18, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Carole H. Latker, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General 
Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 
Room 3AN-18, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-2848, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#375b56435c52455477595e505a4419595e5f19505841"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6c000d1807091e0f2c02050b011f42020504420b031a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 9388, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 3, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
 [FR Doc. E9-4989 Filed 3-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Daniel J. Kash, Respondent, v McCann Real Equities Developments, L. L. C. et al., Appellants, and C. Raimondo & Sons Construction Co. Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Avon Contractors, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. (And Another Action.)

[720 NYS2d 70]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered May 8, 2000, which, in an action for personal injuries by a laborer against the owner, general contractor and construction manager of a building under construction, granted plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of defendants’ liability under Labor Law § 240 (1), denied the owner’s and general contractor’s motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs causes of action under Labor Law §§ 200 and 241 (6) and for common-law negligence, and denied the motion of third-party defendant, plaintiffs employer, for summary judgment dismissing the construction manager’s third-party complaint against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff was performing work that involved an elevation-related risk within the contemplation of Labor Law § 240 (1) when, in the course of installing fire walls in a building under construction, he fell approximately 14 feet to the ground when a mobile scissors lift on which he was working toppled over after being driven by his co-worker over a refrigeration hole that had been left uncovered in the concrete floor. Since the scissors lift did not prevent plaintiff from falling, defendants are liable under section 240 (1) *(see, Gordon v Eastern Ry. Supply,*82 NY2d 555, 561), unless the actions of plaintiff or his co-worker were the sole proximate cause of the accident *(see, Weininger v Hagedorn & Co.,*91 NY2d 958; *Angeles v Goldhirsch,*268 AD2d 217). No issues of fact are raised in the latter regard. Similar considerations warranted denial of defendants’ motions to dismiss plaintiffs claims under sections 200 and 241 (6), it being unclear who was responsible for making sure that the many holes in the floor did not present a hazard. Finally, at this juncture, the record does not permit a finding regarding the applicability of Workers’ Compensation Law § 11. Concur— Williams, J. P., Mazzarelli, Lerner, Rubin and Buckley, JJ.
null

2014-09-16

533.9478

eng - Argued: 2014-09-16. Docket number: 13-1988
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5231 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5231

 To limit Federal court jurisdiction over certain suits pertaining to 
  the application of a price threshold in determining the volume for 
 which suspension of royalties applies to certain offshore oil and gas 
                                leases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2006

   Mr. Issa (for himself, Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia, Mr. Hunter, Mr. 
    Souder, Mr. Calvert, Mrs. Bono, and Mr. Keller) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To limit Federal court jurisdiction over certain suits pertaining to 
  the application of a price threshold in determining the volume for 
 which suspension of royalties applies to certain offshore oil and gas 
                                leases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Deep Water Royalty Jurisdiction 
Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON FEDERAL COURT JURISDICTION OVER QUESTIONS 
              PERTAINING TO ROYALTIES UNDER CERTAIN OFFSHORE OIL AND 
              GAS LEASES.

    (a) Limitation on Certain Jurisdiction.--In any case brought by any 
person other than a department, agency, or instrumentality of the 
United States, no court created by Act of Congress shall have any 
jurisdiction, and the Supreme Court shall have no appellate 
jurisdiction, to hear or decide any question pertaining to--
            (1) the application of a price threshold in determining the 
        volume for which suspension of royalties applies under section 
        8(a)(1)(H) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 
        1337(a)(1)(H)) and section 304 of Public Law 104-58 (43 U.S.C. 
        1337 note) with respect to leases awarded in the 5-year period 
        beginning on November 28, 1995; or
            (2) the interpretation of, or the validity under the 
        Constitution of, this section.
    (b) Certain Defenses not Available.--In any case brought by a 
department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States against any 
person to recover royalties under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands 
Act, no legal or equitable defense shall be available to the defendant 
regarding the matters referred to in paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection 
(a).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 35.4

 

225 Franklin Street 18th Floor

Boston, MA 02110

T 877.526.3562

ngkf.com

Officer’s Certificate

Pursuant to the requirements of the applicable Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, for which Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, and Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark Knight Frank, as Primary Servicer, the undersigned, Ronald Steffenino, a Senior Managing Director of Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark Knight Frank, hereby certifies subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, solely in his capacity as an officer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:

|   | 1. | A review of the activities of the Primary Servicer during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and |   |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|   | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Primary Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. |   |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 31st day of January, 2020.

Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark Knight Frank

  /s/ Ronald Steffenino

Ronald Steffenino

Senior Managing Director,

Servicing and Asset Management

 

 

BPC d/b/a NKF Primary Servicer for Midland

 

----

 

Schedule I

Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates; Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark Knight Frank as Primary Servicer:

COMM 2014-CCRE 17COMM 2014-CCRE19

GSMS 2014-GC24COMM 2014-UBS4

COMM 2015-CCRE23COMM 2015 CCRE27

GSMS 2015-GC30COMM 2015-LC19

COMM 2015-LC21CFCMT 2016-C3

CGCMT 2016-C3CFCRE 2016-C7

CCRESG 2016 HEATCCUBS 2017-C1

CGCMT 2017-C4UBS 2017-C5

BMARK 2018 B3MSCI 2018 L1

UBS 2018 C12UBS 2018 C14

UBS 2018 C8UBS 2018 C9

MSCI 2018 H4MSCI 2019 L2

 

 

----

 

BPC d/b/a NKF Primary Servicer for Midland
From: Phil Hopkinson [mailto:phopkinson@hvolt.com]

Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 10:32 AM

To: Jerry.Corkran@CooperIndustries.com; Jerry Schoen (jerry.schoen@aksteel.com); Raymond Pcolinski

(Raymond.pcolinski@atimetals.com) ; Caskey, John; Rob Greeson (rgreeson@electro-mechanical.com)

Cc: sco_choinski@nema.org; Brian Coffey; Richard Parker

Subject: DOE Negotiations

Good morning Gents:

I want to bring you up to speed on the DOE Negotiations and my role or lack thereof.

1. Richard Parker is the negotiator and has named me to the negotiating team as a result of a

request by AK Steel.

2. Brian Coffey of Navigant Consulting is my dire ctor of consulting activity in support of the DOE.

3. This morning Brian called me to indicate that the DOE does not plan to pay for work by any of

the negotiators and that they will not support my work in the DOE task force. He is actually in

the same u nsupported state and will not be in the meetings either.

4. Brian Coffey pointed out that my contract with Navigant is non

‐ exclusive and as such is not

preventing me from representing others but I would not be representing the DOE or Navigant.

5. Future work by me for Na vigant is likely to be a continuation of general technical expert and

information gatherer as requested.

6. We addressed the aspect of potential conflicts of interest and I indicated that as in every

consulting arrangement, I do my best to find the truth (like cost versus efficiency) and report the

facts without bias. We both agreed that such activity would not be a confli ct of interest.

7. I see several possible paths forward at this point:

a. Disengage from the task force.

b. Remain on the task force as a representative of another organization and attend the

meetings.

c. Remain on th e task force as a representative of another organization but attend the

meetings by telephone only and not attend the meetings in person.

8. I will be glad to assist the negotiations in any useful way that you may see fit at this point and

am not trying to rattle a tin cu p as I have plenty of other consulting work but thought it

important to clarify my current status.

9. I have one conflict for the first meeting as I am giving a seminar on Voltage Transients to

Hammond on September 16 th in Toronto. My plan had been to fly to Washington, DC on the

14 th

, attend the morning and early afternoon sessions of the taskforce on the 15 th

, and then fly

to Toronto on the late afternoon flight on the 15 th to give my seminar. No tickets have been

purchased.

10. I don’t know if either of you have ideas but I would like to start working on any travel plans early

enough to avoid expensive last minute flights.

Thanks for your interest,

Phil

Philip J Hopkinson, PE

President & CEO HVOLT Inc.

3704 High Ridge Rd.

Charlotte, NC 28270phopkinson@hvolt.com

Ph 704-846-3290

Fx 704-845-2520

Cell 704-236-3320

www.hvolt.com
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1147 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 136)IV-E- 9 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:55PM

Sheet 136 of 242P. 2 

### Pt - 

### 87 - XX $ A\ UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y \J^f-j

AN N ARBOR . MICHIGA N 4810 5 .

. OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N 

### SE P 

### 2 5 198

7 MEMORANDU

M SUBJECT : GA

O Contac t Regarding Re d Borde r an d OM B Review s o f Regulator

yPackage s FROM : TO : THRU : Kathlee n A . Steilen , chemica l Enginee r "i• -

Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc h Charle s L . Gray , jr. , Directo r Emissio n Contro l Technolog yDivisio n Glen n W . Passavant , Senio r Projec t Manage r Standard s Developmen t an d Support/Branc h Cheste r J . France , Chief # Standard s Developmen t arT a S"u p 

## jfciLo ^ (Li6>*A

sranc h O n Septembe r 9 , 1987 , I participate d in a telephon e conversatio n wit h NancyBoardma n o f the Genera l Accounting Offic e (GAO) . Sh

e wa s working on a projec t fo r Congressma n Dingel l whic h concerne d OM B an d Re d Boarde r review s o f EP A rulemakings . Dingel l wante d t o knowho wofte n concurren t review s b

ybot h OM

B an d Red Borde r occurre d an d wh yther e wa s littl e writte n record b yOM B o n thei r revie wo f EPA rulemakings . A s part , o f thi s project , she neede d the date s o f Red Borde r an

d OM B review , bot h star t an d completio n dates , fo r the proposal s an

d fina l rule s o f ten rulemakings . In respons e t o thi s reques t I suggeste d tha t sh e contac t Richard Wilson' s offic e i n Washington . I explaine d tha t our office' s procedur e for such request s i s t o initiat e the ma t tha t leve l an

d t o allowhi mt o mak e determinatio n a s t o wh o shoul d b e responsible . I n addition , I mentione d tha t sinc e the rulemaking s bein

g investigate d wer e no t al l develope d withi n ECTD , a differen t sectio n withi n OM S ma ybe abl e t o mor e efficientl ytrac k the reviewdate s o f thes e rulemakings . cc : Docke t A-87-1 1
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5117 

To exempt persons with disabilities from the prohibition against providing 

section 8 rental assistance to college students. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2006 

Ms. PRYCE of Ohio (for herself, Mr. HOBSON, Mr. TIBERI, Mr. NEY, and Mr. 

LEACH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To exempt persons with disabilities from the prohibition 

against providing section 8 rental assistance to college 

students. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES 

4 FROM SECTION 8 RENTAL ASSISTANCE PRO5 HIBITION. 

6 Subsection (a) of section 327 of Public Law 109–115 

7 (119 Stat. 2466) is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

9 end; 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5117 IH 

1 (2) by redesignating paragraph (6) as para2 graph (7); and 

3 (3) by inserting after paragraph (5) the fol4 lowing new paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(6) is not a person with disabilities, as such 

6 term is defined in section 3(b)(3)(E) of the United 

7 States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 

8 1437a(b)(3)(E)); and’’. 

Æ 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS