alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.22

 

	
THE   IOWA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION 
   Official Form NO. 136
    	
G.R. Neumann
    	
FOR THE LEGAL EFFECT OF THE USE OF THIS FORM, 
   CONSULT YOUR LAWYER
    


 

	

    	
PROMISSORY NOTE
    


 

	
$ 500,000.00
    	
July                               , 2008
    


 

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, each as principal, jointly and severally, promise(s) to pay to the order of NewLink Genetics Corporation at 2901 South Loop Drive, Suite #3900, Ames , Iowa, the sum of Five Hundred Thousand and 0/100 DOLLARS with interest thereon from July     , 2008, payable as provided below at the rate of 2.42 (the current AFR)per cent per annum until payment hereof as follows:

 

All principal and accrued interest shall be due and payable upon the earlier of eighteen months from the date of this Promissory Note or upon the sale of the undersigned debtors’ Colorado home located at                                                                                    , Colorado.

 

This Promissory Note shall be secured by a first mortgage given upon the property described as Lot 29 in Otter Creek Golf Course Plat 1, an Official Plat, now included in and forming a part of the City of Ankeny, Polk County, Iowa.

 

Interest shall first be deducted from the payment and any balance shall be applied on principal.

 

Principal and interest not paid when due shall draw interest at the rate of 12 % per annum.  Upon default in payment of any interest, or any installment of principal, the whole amount then unpaid shall become immediately due and payable at the option of the holder without notice.  The undersigned, in case of suit on this note, agrees to pay attorney’s fees.

 

Makers, endorsers and sureties waive demand of payment, notice of non-payment, protest and notice.  Sureties, endorsers and guarantors agree to all of the provisions of this note, and consent that the time or times of payment of all or any part hereof may be extended after maturity, from time to time, without notice.

 

Important.  Read Before Signing:  The terms of this Agreement should be read carefully because only those terms in writing are enforceable.  No other terms or oral promises not contained in this written contract may be legally enforced.  You may change the terms of this Agreement only by another written agreement.  Borrower acknowledges the receipt of a copy of this document at the time it was signed.

 

	
Address:
    	
1407   NE 47th St.
    	
 
    	
/s/   Gordon Link
    
	
 
    	
ANKENY,   IA 50021
    	
 
    	
Gordon   H. Link, Jr.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Phone:
    	
303-513-3039
    	
 
    	
/s/   Dawn Link
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Dawn   J. Link
    


 

Caveat: This form not to be used for a Consumer Credit Transaction.

 

	
© The Iowa State Bar Association 2005 
   IOWADOCSÒ
    	
136 PROMISSORY NOTE  
   Revised January 2005
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
        OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report (as defined under the preceding Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, Peter Lamoureux,
President of Everest Asset Management, Inc. , the general partner of the Everest
Fund, L.P. (the "Fund"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Fund.


                                        By: /s/ Peter Lamoureux
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name: Peter Lamoureux
                                        Title: Director, President and Treasurer
                                        March 29, 2006
No. 09-10033.

#### Tanya Marie Smith, Petitioner v. United States.

560 U.S. 914, 130 S. Ct. 3298,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1201,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4034.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 359 Fed. Appx. 491.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,227]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 10, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed by UNITE HERE on behalf of workers of Tama Manufacturing Co., Inc., Allentown, Pennsylvania.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of March 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-5172 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6782

MELVIN CORNELIOUS WILSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

B. ZOLICOFFER, Lieutenant; E. MORRIS,

Sergeant; E. CLARK, Assistant Warden; W. H.

TUCKER, Captain; E. MOHEAD, Sergeant; J. V.

BEALE, Deputy Warden; RUFUS FLEMING, Regional

Director; J. M. JABE, Chief Warden; RONALD J.

ANGELONE, Director,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-96-549-2)

Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 23, 1997

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin Cornelious Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilson

v. Zolicoffer, No. CA-96-549-2 (E.D. Va. May 29, 1997). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the annual report of Patriot Scientific Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an
exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of Patriot Scientific
Corporation does hereby certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
August 14, 2008


/s/CLIFFORD
      L. FLOWERS
              Clifford
      L. Flowers
              Chief
      Financial Officer
# C_2017343EN.01000101.xml

| 13.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8561 — KKR / Q Park)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 343/01)

On 13 September 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8561. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8561. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  1)
    
    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months
ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2)
    
    the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the three months ended June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Plumas Bancorp.
 Date:  July 28, 2010
    
    /s/ Andrew J. RybackAndrew J. Ryback, Interim Chief Executive Officer
WebFilings | EDGAR view


 


EXHIBIT 10.27
 
 
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
LNG SERVICES AGREEMENT
 
This Amendment No 2. (this “Amendment”) dated December 16, 2010, amends that certain LNG Services Agreement dated March 26, 2010 and effective as of April 1, 2010, as amended by that certain Amendment No. 1 to LNG Services Agreement, dated June 24, 2010 and effective as of July 1, 2010 (as amended, the “Original Agreement”), by and between Cheniere Marketing, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“CMI”) and JPMorgan LNG Co., a Delaware company (“LNGCo”).  CMI and LNGCo are sometimes individually referred to as a “Party” and, collectively, referred to as the “Parties”.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Original Agreement.
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Original Agreement in accordance with the terms of this Amendment; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements, covenants and conditions contained in this Agreement, as well as for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1.    
Amendment to Section 9.2
Section 9.2 of the Original Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
“9.2    Termination Option.  Each of CMI and LNGCo shall have the option to terminate this Agreement at its sole discretion on the day following the first anniversary of the Effective Date by providing the other Party written notice of the exercise of its option to terminate no later than March 1, 2011, whereupon the first anniversary of the Effective Date shall become the “Early Termination Date.”
 
2.    No Other Changes; Reference.  Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  
3.    Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with the State of New York, without regard to principles of laws (whether of the State of New York or any other jurisdiction).
4.    Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in counterparts and if so executed by each Party hereto, all copies together shall constitute a single agreement.
*********
 
 
 

 


 


 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.
 
CHENIERE MARKETING, LLC
			
	By:
	 
	/s/  Davis Thames

	Name:
	 
	Davis Thames

	Title:
	 
	President




 
 
 
JPMORGAN LNG Co.
			
	By:
	 
	/s/  Patrick Strange

	Name:
	 
	Patrick Strange

	Title:
	 
	Vice President




 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Signature Page to Amendment No. 2 to LNG Services Agreement
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5117 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5117

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To exempt persons with disabilities from the prohibition against 
       providing section 8 rental assistance to college students.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES FROM SECTION 8 RENTAL 
              ASSISTANCE PROHIBITION.

    Subsection (a) of section 327 of Public Law 109-115 (119 Stat. 
2466) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (7); and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(6) is not a person with disabilities, as such term is 
        defined in section 3(b)(3)(E) of the United States Housing Act 
        of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437a(b)(3)(E)) and was not receiving 
        assistance under such section 8 as of November 30, 2005; and''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 13, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5117

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To exempt persons with disabilities from the prohibition against 
       providing section 8 rental assistance to college students.
```
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 10:16 AM

To: 'paul@SkyPhilly.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA); Schandler, Andrea (FAA) ; Cooper, Thuy (FAA); Pearson, Lakisha

(FAA) Subject: Request for Additional Information: SkyPhilly, Inc.



### February 2, 2015

Mr. Paul Caskey

CTO SkyPhilly, Inc. 4059 Steeplechase Dr. Collegeville, PA 19426

Dear Mr. Caskey:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-0908). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Your petition references the material listed belo w, however the material was not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

o S900 User Manual

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemption@faa.gov . If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the in formation described above by February 17, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 205912 PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
Cathy Anne Carswell REIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Barbara Anthony CARSWELL, et al., Defendants.

No. COA18-1039

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 6, 2019

DISMISSED.
No. 09-9019.

#### Demetrius Lydell Bryant, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1020, 130 S. Ct. 1918,

176 L. Ed. 2d 389,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2538.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 332 Fed. Appx. 14.
No. D-2462.

#### In the Matter of Disbarment of Stafford Sheehan.

559 U.S. 1035, 130 S. Ct. 2087,

176 L. Ed. 2d 433,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2914.

March 29, 2010.

Disbarment order entered.

Former order, 558 U.S. 1044, 130 S. Ct. 794, 175 L. Ed. 2d 552, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 8492.
No. 09-8327.

#### Paul Runge, Petitioner v. Illinois.

559 U.S. 1108, 130 S. Ct. 2402,

176 L. Ed. 2d 925,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3748.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.

*926Same case below, 234 Ill. 2d 68, 334 Ill. Dec. 865, 917 N.E.2d 940.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report of Infosmart Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the nine months period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Parker Seto, Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify
as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.




Date:
      November 16, 2009
              
              /s/
      Parker SetoParker
      SetoChief
      Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5169 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5169

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 13, 2006

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1310 Highway 64 NW. in Ramsey, Indiana, as the ``Wilfred Edward 
                `Cousin Willie' Sieg, Sr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WILFRED EDWARD ``COUSIN WILLIE'' SIEG, SR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1310 Highway 64 NW. in Ramsey, Indiana, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Wilfred Edward `Cousin Willie' Sieg, Sr. Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Wilfred 
Edward `Cousin Willie' Sieg, Sr. Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 12, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
NUMBER 1 3-09 -005 69-CV 

### C O U R T O F AP P E AL S T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS C O R P U S C H R I S T I - E D I N B U R G

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ RAPI D MORTG AGE CO ., I NC. , Appe llant , v
. DAVI D REYES, Appe llee.

_ _ _ _ _ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ On Appe al fro m t he 92nd Dis tri ct Cou rt of Hid algo Count y , Tex as
.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

### M E M O R AN D U M O P I N I O N Before Chi ef Justi ce Val dez, J usti ces Yañez a nd Vel a

M emor andum O pini on Per Cur ia m App ellant perf ecte d an app eal f rom a judgme nt ent ered by the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo Coun ty, T exa s , in cause num ber C-2899 -07-A. App ellant has f iled an
uno ppo sed mo tion to dism iss the app eal on gr oun ds tha t the app ellant no longer desires to prosecu te his causes of action. App ellant requests tha t this Court dismiss the app eal.T h e Co u rt , having consid ered the docu me nts on f ile and app ellant ’s uno ppo sed

mo tion to dism iss the app eal, is of the opin ion tha t the mo tion shou ld be gr ant ed. See T E X
. R. A P P
. P. 42. 1( a ). App ellant ’s mo tion to dism iss is gr ant ed, and the app eal is here by DISMISSE D. Costs w ill be taxed against app ellant

. See T E X
. R. A P P
. P. 42. 1(d) ("Ab sent agreem ent of the partie s, the court w ill tax costs against the app ellant ."). Havi ng dism issed the app eal a t a p p ellant 's request, no mo tion f or rehe aring w ill be ent ertain ed, and our
ma nda te will issue f orthwith.

PER CURIAM Deliv ered an d f iled the 18 th d ay of

Feb ruary, 2010

.

2
#### Stephen Gresalfi et al., Appellants, v Edwin Klein et al., Respondents.

[718 NYS2d 859]

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover a down payment given under a contract for the sale of *450real property, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), dated September 15, 1999, which denied their motion for summary judgment on the complaint and granted the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is modified by deleting therefrom the provision granting the cross motion and substituting therefor a provision denying the cross motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and Schmidt, JJ., concur.