alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE v. Cory Dion BENNETT

406PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 21, 2019

Franklin E. Wells, Jr., Attorney at Law, Asheboro, for Bennett, Cory Dion.

Brent Kiziah, Assistant Attorney General, Ernie Lee, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 20th of May 2019 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 21st of May 2019."

*112Defendant shall have up to and including the 28th day of June 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
No. 09-1041.

#### Arben Skendaj, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

559 U.S. 1093, 130 S. Ct. 2379,

176 L. Ed. 2d 768,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3486.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 343 Fed. Appx. 750.
Exhibit 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, James V. Mazzo and Richard A. Meier, the Chief Executive Officer
and the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certify to the best of their knowledge that:

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 29, 2007 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Dated: August 7, 2007



/s/ James V. MazzoJames V. Mazzo, Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer/s/ Richard A. MeierRichard A. Meier, Chief Operating Officer and Chief
Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Advanced
Medical Optics, Inc. and will be retained by Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 09-7977.

#### Paul Bradley Speer, Petitioner v. Arizona.

559 U.S. 947, 130 S. Ct. 1520,

176 L. Ed. 2d 126,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1479.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona denied.

Same case below, 221 Ariz. 449, 212 P.3d 787.
Luke M. CHARDE, Jr. and wife, Maureen Charde, Macdonald Snow Bowden, and wife, Anna C. Bowden, Clifton H. Hammond, Hilda P. Heath, Annie Mildred Lowery, Tony M. Parton, and wife, Carolyn B. Parton, Eric D. Schneider, and wife, Victoria Carpenter, Jeanne C. Sloan, individually and as Trustee of The Jeanne C. Sloan Trust dated 8/29/1994, and husband, Jerry L. Sloan, Evelyn T. Tharp, Thomas D. Workman, and wife, Ann Workman, Bruce Wright, and wife, Penelope Wright, Helmut G. Bracke Revocable Declaration of Truste dated 5/10/02, Daisy M. Raeford, Joseph C. Konen, and wife, Joan Konen, and Mark S. Harris, Plaintiffs, v. The TOWN OF DAVIDSON, a North Carolina body politic and corporate, Davidson Commons East Condominium Associates, LLC, a North Carolina Limited Liability Company, Beacon Img., Inc., a North Carolina corporation, and Nishith G. Patel, Defendants.

No. COA18-938

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 18, 2019

AFFIRMED.
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

Ms. Teri Chessall 

Director of Safety and Regulatory Compliance 

Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc. d/b/a Seaborne Airlines 

268 A venida Luis Munoz Rivera, 9111 Floor 

San Juan, PR 00918 

Dear Ms. Chessall: 

800 Independence Ave. 

Washington, DC 20591 

FEB 0 2 2015 

This is in response to your March 31 , 2014, letter (Docket No. F AA-20 14-0221 ), 

petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Seaborne Virgin Islands, 

Inc. d/b/a Seaborne Airlines (Seaborne) for an exemption from § 121.339 (a) (2), (3) and (4) of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow 

Seaborne to operate a Saab 340, a turbo-prop aircraft, beyond the 50 mile extended overwater 

limitation without certain emergency equipment. 

Upon review of Seaborne's request and supporting information, the FAA finds that 

§ l21.339(a) allows the FAA Administrator to grant deviation from certain requirements for 

particular extended overwater operations. This letter is to inform you that the FAA will 

proceed with your petition as a request for deviation and will take no further action on the 

petition for exemption. Accordingly, Docket No. F AA-20 14-0221 is being closed. 

If you have any questions, please contact Jackie Clow, Aviation Safety Inspector, part 121 Air 

Carrier Operations Branch, AFS-220 at (602) 379-4864 ext. 260. 

Sincerely, 

~r~~~~------

Leslie H. Smith 

Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service
No. 09-9768.

#### Justin Reata Stanton, Petitioner v. E. K. McDaniel, Warden, et al.

560 U.S. 912, 130 S. Ct. 3293,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1197,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3898.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 09-9662.

#### Wilmer Giovany Olmedo, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1112, 130 S. Ct. 2416,

176 L. Ed. 2d 933,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3706.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 959.
No. 09-1008.

#### Michael Scott, et ux., Petitioners v. Samuel I. White, P.C. et al.

559 U.S. 1106, 130 S. Ct. 2404,

176 L. Ed. 2d 923,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3863.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
Sadie J. CARTER and Helen C. Lytch v. ST. AUGUSTINE'S UNIVERSITY

No. 456P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Charles T. Francis, Ruth A. Sheehan, Attorneys at Law, for St. Augustine's University.

Nicholas J. Sanservino, Jr., Laura L. Noble, Attorneys at Law, for Carter, Sadie J., et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 27th of December 2018 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
Director Compensation Schedule for 2006 and 2007



 Exhibit 10.62 
 2006 and 2007 Board of Directors Compensation 
  

					
	 Compensation Component
	  	Amount	 
	 Board Retainer
	  	$	110,000	  
	 Audit Committee Chair Retainer
	  	$	65,000	  
	 Audit Committee Member Retainer
	  	$	45,000	  
	 Compensation Committee Chair Retainer
	  	$	45,000	  
	 Compensation Committee Member Retainer
	  	$	40,000	  
	 Investment Committee Chair Retainer
	  	$	45,000	  
	 Investment Committee Member Retainer
	  	$	40,000	  
	 Additional Committee Chair Retainer*
	  	$	15,000	  
	 Additional Committee Member Retainer*
	  	$	10,000	  
	 Chairman of the Board
	  	$	200,000	  

  

	*	Excludes Executive Committee.
2011 Notice of Grant



 EXHIBIT 10.23 

 

 

 Notice of Grant 
 Babcock & Wilcox Long-Term Incentives 
 [Date] 

TO: [Name] 
 The Company is pleased to advise
that you have been granted long-term incentives as follows: 
  

					
	 Date of Grant:
	  	  
	  	
	 Performance Shares Granted:
	  	  
	  	
	 Restricted Stock Units Granted:
	  	  
	  	
	 Non Qualified Stock Options Granted:
	  	  
	  	

 By your signature below, you agree that these incentives are granted under and governed by the terms and
conditions of the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan of The Babcock & Wilcox Company (as amended and restated to date, the “Plan”), and the 2011 B&W Restricted Stock Units, Stock Options and Performance Shares Agreements, which are
attached to and made a part of this document. A copy of the Plan and the Prospectus relating to the stock issued under the Plan can be found at http://equityawardcenter.schwab.com under the “At a Glance/My Company Info” tab in your
Schwab account. The Plan and Prospectus are incorporated by reference and made a part of this document. If you would like to receive a copy of either the Plan or Prospectus, please contact
                     at [telephone number] or [email]. 
 Please acknowledge (1) your receipt and acceptance of this Notice of Grant and accompanying long-term incentives and (2) your agreement with the terms contained in the Grant Agreement governing
such long-term incentives, by signing both this Notice and the enclosed copy hereof and returning one such signed copy to The Babcock & Wilcox Company at The Harris Building, 13024 Ballantyne Corporate Place, Charlotte, NC 28277, Attention:
                    , Director Corporate Compensation, and marked “Personal and Confidential.” Your long-term incentives will not be
effective until you return a signed copy of this Notice. Please do so no later than 30 days from the date of the Notice. 
  

			
	  
	  	Date:                    
	PARTICIPANT
CREWS v. CREWS

119A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 2, 2019

Carolyn J. Woodruff, Attorney at Law, Jessica Snowberger Bullock, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Crews, James Scott.

Jon W. Myers, Attorney at Law, Lexington, Michelle Duff King, Attorney at Law, for Crews, Lisa Dawn.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 1st of May 2019 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd of May 2019."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 7th day of June 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
#### Daniel T. Lowe, alias Red Lowe, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed January 26, 1928.

*82
      *J. C. Durrance*and *Percy L. Thomas,*for' Plaintiff in Error;

*Fred PL. Davis,*Attorney General, and *Boy Campbell,*Assistant Attorney General, for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

Daniel T. Lowe was indicted, tried and convicted of the crime of rape in Duval County, Florida. The trial took place October 4, 1926, the verdict was without recommendation, so the death penalty was imposed. Lowe took writ of error to this Court and seeks reversal on the ground, (1) that the trial court erred in denying his motion for continuance, (2) refusal of the trial court to give charges requested by defendant, (3) the admission in evidence of a certain newspaper found in defendant’s possession when he was arrested, (4) in sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, and (5) denial of defendant’s motion for new trial.

The motion for continuance was predicated on the showing that only four days elapsed from the date of the appointment of counsel to represent Lowe to the date of his trial, and that during said time he was so closely guarded that counsel could not see him privately and did not have sufficient opportunity to prepare his defense.

It is true that under our system of jurisprudence the constitutional guaranty of fair and'impartial trial contemplates the benefit of counsel and ample opportunity to pre*83pare for trial, which opportunity is governed by the facts of the individual case. Anderson v. State, 92 Fla. 477, 110 So. 250; Christie v. State, decided August 1, 1927. The motion for continuance is devoid of any showing of facts or circumstances such as was shown in the Anderson and Christie cases, that would indicate that four days was not ample time to prepare for the trial of this cause. It was the duty of the jailor or those having the defendant in custody to make provision for him to be seen and consulted by counsel, but no showing is made of a request or demand for such provision and a refusal thereof. No error was, therefore, committed in denying the motion for continuance.

We think the charges requested by defendant were properly denied because the general charge given by the court fully covered the law of the ease. The newspaper found in possession of defendant was properly introduced in evidence and the entire record amply supports the verdict below.

The judgment of the Circuit Court of Duval County, Florida, must be and is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Brown, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Strum, J., absent because of illness.
CABARRUS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE TREASURER, et al.

369PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 28, 2019

Blake W. Thomas, Deputy General Counsel, Matthew W. Sawchak, Solicitor General, Ryan Y. Park, Deputy Solicitor General, Joseph A. Newsome, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Department of State Treasurer, et al.

Michael Crowell, Attorney at Law, Deborah R. Stagner, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Lindsey V. Smith, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Cabarrus County Board of Education.

Elizabeth L. Troutman, Attorney at Law, Jill R. Wilson, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Allison B. Schafer, Legal Counsel/Director of Policy, for N.C. School Boards Association.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 28th of June 2019 by Petitioner:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of June 2019."

Petitioner shall have up to and including the 7th day of August 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5245 Reported in Senate (RS)]







                                                       Calendar No. 494
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5245


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 7, 2006

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             June 22, 2006

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1 Marble Street in Fair Haven, Vermont, as the ``Matthew Lyon Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MATTHEW LYON POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1 Marble Street in Fair Haven, Vermont, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Matthew Lyon Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Matthew 
Lyon Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 494

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5245

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1 Marble Street in Fair Haven, Vermont, as the ``Matthew Lyon Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 22, 2006

                       Reported without amendment`
#### Porter Carroll Hardware Company, a Corporation, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. W. M. Stone, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed May 4, 1928.

*Garter & Solomon,*for Plaintiff in Error;

No appearance for Defendant in Error.

*863Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and. inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Print	
    - 
    -    					Published: 18 December 2023				 

 

#### Federal Executive Branch Affirms Roles and Responsibilities in U.S. Elections

The Federal Executive Branch serves to protect U.S. elections and voters, systems, officials, and workers in various ways. Many of its responsibilities are longstanding, while some are more inspired by the recent threats of foreign election influence and interference.

 

We are collectively releasing this fact sheet to affirm the Federal Executive Branch’s roles and responsibilities in U.S. elections. While state and local officials are responsible for the administration of elections, Federal departments and agencies provide states with critical assistance in mitigating election security challenges, protect citizens’ rights to vote, and offers access to relevant information. This fact sheet is a formal reference document for state and local jurisdictions and provides links to additional resources for these officials.
# C_2016417EN.01000701.xml

| 11.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 417/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 417/7

---

EUROPEAN INSTITUTE OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2015

(2016/C 417/24)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://eit.europa.eu/interact/bookshelf/governing-board-decision-opinion-governing-board-final-accounts-2015

---
# C_2017058EN.01000601.xml

| 23.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/6

---

Special Report No 1/2017

‘More efforts needed to implement the Natura 2000 network to its full potential’

(2017/C 58/06)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 1/2017 ‘More efforts needed to implement the Natura 2000 network to its full potential’ has just been published.

‘More efforts needed to implement the Natura 2000 network to its full potential’

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu or on EU Bookshop: https://bookshop.europa.eu

---
STATE v. Ronald P. CAMERON

164P19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 19, 2019

Ronald P. Cameron, for Cameron, Ronald P.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st of May 2019 by Defendant to Dismiss Prosecution:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 44 (Monday, March 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4869]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11677 and <greek-i>11678]


Oregon Disaster <greek-i>OR-00029

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for public assistance only for the state of Oregon (FEMA-1824-
DR), dated 03/02/2009.
    Incident: Severe winter storm, record and near record snow, 
landslides, and mudslides.
    Incident Period: 12/20/2008 through 12/26/2008.
    Effective Date: 03/02/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/01/2009.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/02/2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 03/02/2009, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:
Primary Counties: Clackamas, Clatsop, Columbia, Marion, Multnomah, 
Polk, Yamhill.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit             4.500
 Available Elsewhere..........................................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere..........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11677B 
and for economic injury is 11678B.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-4869 Filed 3-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
----

Exhibit      32.1 

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE **

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002 **

**STUDIO      ONE MEDIA, INC. **

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                           |                                                    |                                      |
|------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                           | **STUDIO                ONE MEDIA, INC.**               |
|                                      |                                               |                                 |
| Date: *September                28, 2006* | By:                                           | /s/ *Preston                J. Shea* |
|                                           | *Preston                J. Shea*                        |
|                                           | *President                and Chief Accounting Officer* |