T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. R o d r ig u e z c o n s e n te dto p r o c e e db e f o r e am a g is tr a te ju d g e . See 28 * * U . S . C . § 6 36 (c ).

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** * w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J O SE H . CERV A N TES, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. D A R R E L G . A D A M S , W ar den, C S P ; et a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 12- 16196 D. C . No . 1 : 1 1 - c v - 0 0 3 8 7 - B AM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia B a rba r aM c A ul i f

f e , M a gi s tr a t e Judge , P r e s i di ng ** S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2012 *** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J os e H . C e rva nt e s , aC a l i f orni as t a t e pr i s one r , appe a l s pr o s e f r om the 

# FI LED JAN 02 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 16196 2 di stri ctcourt ’ s j ud gm entdi sm i ss i ng hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1 98 3 act i on al l egi ng that d e f e n d a n t s v i o l a t e dh i s c o n s t i tu t i o n a l r i g h t s . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o ad is m is s a l u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § § 1 9 1 5 A o r1 9 1 5 ( e ) ( 2 ) . R es ni ck v. H ayes , 2 1 3 F .3 d4 4 3 , 4 4 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) ; B arr e n v . H arr i ngton , 152 F. 3 d1 1 9 3 , 1 1 9 4 ( 9 th Ci r . 1 9 9 8 ) ( o r d e r ) . W e a f f i rm. Th e d i s tr i c tc o u rtp r o p e r l yd i s mi s s e dCe rv a n t e s ’ s d u e p r o c e s s c l a i ms re gardi ng hi s gang v al i dat i on and ass i gn m entt o the se curi ty hou si ng un i t(“ S H U ”) b e c au s e , e v e n a s s u m i n g h e h a dal i b e rtyi n t e r e s ti n a v o i d i n g i n d e t e rm i n a t e S HU co n fi n em en t , th e fact s al l eg edb y C erv an t es sh o w th ath e received al l th e p ro cess th a t h e w a s du e . Se e W ilkin s o n v . A u s tin , 545 U . S . 209, 228- 29 ( 2005) ( not i c e a nd o p p o rtu n ityto b e h e a r da r e a d e q u a te p r o c e du r a l s a f e g u a r d s f o rp la c e m e n t in m a x im u m c u s to d y ) ; B ru ce v. Y l st , 351 F . 3d 1283, 1287 ( 9th C i r . 2003) ( pr i s on of f i c i a l s m us tpr ovi de i nm a t e f a c i ng ga ng va l i da t i on w i th not i c e of the c ha r ge s a nd a n o p p o rtu n i tyt o p r e s e n th i s v i e w s , a n dd e c i s i o n s mu s tb e s up p o rt e db y“ s o me evi dence” w i th suffi ci enti nd i ci a of r el i abi l i ty) . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r lyd is m is s e dC e rv a n te s ’s c la im th a t c o n f in e m e n t in th e S H U c o n s titu te dc ru e l a n du n u s u a l p u n is h m e n t b e c au s e C e rv a n te s f a ile dto al l ege f ac t s s uffi ci entt o sho w thatdefe nd ant s knew of and d i sr egar ded an e x c e s s iv e r is ko f

h a rm to h is h e a lth o rs a f e ty . Se e Farm e rv . B r e nnan , 5 1 1 U . S.12- 16196 3 8 2 5 , 8 3 7 ( 1 9 9 4 ) ( “[ A ] p r is o n o f f ic ia l c a n n o t b e f

o u n dliab le u n d e rth e E ig h th A m e ndm e ntf

orde ny i ng a n i nm a t e hum a ne c ondi t i ons of c onf i ne m e ntunl e s s the offi ci al kn ow s of and di sr egar ds an exces si ve ri sk t o i nm at e hea l th o r s af ety . . . . ”) . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r lyd is m is s e dC e rv a n te s ’s F ir s t A m e n d m e n t c la im c ha l l e ngi ng the pr i s on’ s de t e rm i na t i on tha ts y m bol s f ound i n at a tt oo on hi s body a nd adr a w i ng i n hi s c e l l w e r e a s s oc i a t e d w i th the M e xi c a n M a f i apr i s on ga ng a nd c o u lds e rv e a s s o u r c e ite m s in h is g a n g v a lid a tio n . See Jo n es v. N . C . P riso n ers’ L ab or U ni on , Inc. , 4 3 3 U .S . 1 1 9 , 1 2 9 - 3 2 ( 1 9 7 7 ) ( p r is o n o f f ic ia ls m a yc u rta il pr i s one r ’ s F i r s tA m e ndm e ntr i ght s i f the yde t e rm i ne tha tpa rt i c ul a re xpr e s s i ve or a s s oc i a t i ona l c onduc tha s a“ l i ke l i hood of di s rupt i on t o pr i s on or de rors t abi l i ty , or o th e rw is e in te r f

e r e [ s ] w ith [ ] le g itim a te p e n o lo g ic a l o b je c tiv e s ” ) . T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on byde ny i ng C e rva nt e s ’ s m ot i on for app oi ntm entof coun se l because C ervant es fa i l ed t o d em on stra t e e xcept i on al c ir c u m s ta n c e s . See P alm erv. V aldez , 560 F . 3d 965, 970 ( 9th C i r . 2009) ( s e tt i ng f orth s t a nda r d of

r e vi e w a nd r e qui r e m e ntof “ e xc e pt i ona l c i r c um s t a nc e s ” f or ap p o in tm e n t o f

c o u n s e l) . C e rv a n te s ’s c o n te n tio n s c o n c e rn in g a lle g e dv io la tio n s o f C a lif o rn ia D e p a rtm e n t o f

C o rr e c tio n s an dR e h ab ilita tio n p o lic ie s a r e u n a v a ilin g . AF F I RME D.