alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ODNIHeader2




Print
  The Office of Civil Liberties, Privacy and Transparency (CLPT) leads the integration of civil liberties and privacy protections into the policies, procedures, programs and activities of the Intelligence Community (IC). Its overarching goal is to ensure that the IC operates within the full scope of its authorities in a manner that protects civil liberties and privacy, provides appropriate transparency, and earns and retains the trust of the American people.  CLPT is led by the Civil Liberties Protection Officer, a position established by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004. The Act provides that the Civil Liberties Protection Officer reports directly to the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), and sets forth his duties, which include ensuring that privacy and civil  liberties protections are appropriately addressed in the policies and procedures of intelligence agencies; overseeing compliance by the ODNI with privacy and civil liberties in programs and operations administered by the ODNI; and ensuring that the use of technology sustains, and does not erode, privacy. The Civil Liberties Protection Officer also serves as the ODNI’s Chief Transparency Officer. In that capacity, he is responsible for leading implementation of the Principles of Intelligence Transparency for the IC. The Principles guide how the IC should make information publicly available while protecting classified information, when disclosure would harm national security.
No. 09-9395.

#### Rafael Gonzalez, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1055, 130 S. Ct. 2358,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3046,

176 L. Ed. 2d 572,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 09-10002.

#### Jesse Boyd, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1115, 130 S. Ct. 2417,

176 L. Ed. 2d 940,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3777.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, John Jones, Chief Executive Officer of Joning Corp. certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Joning Corp.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report
(the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

     6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


October 11, 2004

/s/  John Jones
-----------------------------
     John Jones
     Chief Executive Officer
DNFSB results from the 2017 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS) indicate the agency

continues to make progress in areas of importance to employees. These areas include 

employment diversity, the skill level of work units, work-life balance, and opportunities to 

develop leadership skills. The DNFSB remains committed to using the FEVS results to improve 

the way it accomplishes its mission to ensure the adequate protection of the public and the 

workers at DOE’s defense nuclear facilities.

Highlights from DNFSB's 2017 FEVS results include: 

• This year the DNFSB achieved a response rate of 89% (more than 43% higher than 

the Governmentwide average). DNFSB's leadership expresses its appreciation to 

agency employees for their participation in the survey and remains committed to 

finding meaningful ways to address issues raised by the FEVS.

• The DNFSB received high marks in Employee Engagement–focused survey items 

related to the collaborative work relationship between employees and their immediate 

supervisors. It also demonstrated steady, continuing improvement in the area of 

performance, particularly with respect to the key drivers of performance feedback and 

performance ratings. 

• Challenges for the DNFSB include the need to address employees’ falling confidence 

in their senior leaders, which has a significant impact on employees’ overall job 

satisfaction and their perceptions about the agency’s ability to achieve its mission. 

The DNFSB must also determine the basis for the high percentage of survey 

responses that fall into the “Neither Agree nor Disagree” category. Understanding 

the reason for these neutral responses may improve future agency results across the 

survey. 

DNFSB will continue its ongoing improvement efforts by providing employees with access to 

the FEVS results and by using the results, along with other feedback data, to develop Action 

Plans to influence positive change.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Magnitude Information Systems,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the
"Form 10-KSB"), I, Steven D. Rudnik, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
I, Joerg H. Klaube, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, as of the
date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge, that
the Company's Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-KSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 30, 2005           MAGNITUDE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.

                                 By: /s/ Steven D. Rudnik
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                         Steven D. Rudnik
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer

                                 By: /s/ Joerg H. Klaube
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                         Joerg H. Klaube
                                         Chief  Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, David R. Butler, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of TCI Solutions, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the period presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 13, 2005

 

/s/ David R. Butler

David R. Butler 

President and 

Chief Executive Officer
No. 09-8460.

#### Andre Cooper, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 957, 130 S. Ct. 1554,

176 L. Ed. 2d 143,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1375.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 343 Fed. Appx. 830.
HAMLET H.M.A., LLC v. HERNANDEZ

425A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 17, 2019

Mark L. Hayes, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Hernandez, Pedro (M.D.).

William S. F. Freeman, Attorney at Law, Rebecca C. Huntington, Attorney at Law, for Hamlet H.M.A., LLC D/B/A Sandhills Regional Medical Center.

Linwood Jones, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for N.C. Healthcare Association.

Ryan Y. Park, Deputy Solicitor General, K. D. Sturgis, Special Deputy Attorney General, Daniel Paul Mosteller, Attorney at Law, Laura H. McHenry, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 15th of May 2019 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of May 2019."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 24th day of June 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.

Davis, J. recused
STATE of North Carolina v. Billy Ray WOODY

No. COA18-1001

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 16, 2019

NO ERROR.
srer_ex102.htm


EXHIBIT 10.2


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO 


SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE







This First Amendment to Secured Promissory Note (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 22nd day of February, 2011 by and between General Cannabis, Inc. (f/k/a LC Luxuries Limited), a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and Justin Hartfield, an individual (the “Holder”).







RECITALS







WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder are parties to that certain Secured Promissory Note dated as of November 19, 2010 in the original principal amount of $900,000.00 (the “Original Agreement”);







WHEREAS, the Maturity Date set forth in the Original Agreement was January 10, 2012;







WHEREAS, both the Company and the Holder desire to amend the terms of the Original Agreement to change the Maturity Date as set forth herein.







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein contained, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:







1.           The Maturity Date as set forth in the Original Agreement shall be changed to June 30, 2012.







2.           Other than as set forth herein, the terms and conditions of Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first written above.








	
“Company”

	 	
“Holder”


	  	 	  
	
General Cannabis, Inc.,

	 	  
	
a Nevada corporation

	 	  
	  	 	  
	
/s/  James Pakulis

	 	
/s/  Justin Hartfield


	
By:

	
James Pakulis

	 	
By:

	
Justin Hartfield


	
Its:

	
CEO
CHAVEZ, et al. v. CARMICHAEL

437PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 31, 2019

Sean F. Perrin, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Carmichael, Irwin (Sheriff).

Sejal Zota, Attorney at Law, for Chavez, Carlos, et al.

Erez Reuveni, Attorney at Law, for United States.

Joshua S. Press, Attorney at Law, for United States.

W. Rob Heroy, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Chavez, Carlos, et al.

Gill P. Beck, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for United States.

Deborah Weissman, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Law Scholars and National Immigrant Justice Center.

Raul A. Pinto, Attorney at Law, for North Carolina Justice Center.

Irena Como, Attorney at Law, for ACLU, et al.

Cody Wofsy, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for ACLU, et al.

Daniel Galindo, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for ACLU, et al.

Omar Jadwat, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for ACLU, et al.

Spencer Amdur, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for ACLU, et al.

Katrina Braun, Attorney at Law, for ACLU, et al.

R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th of July 2019 by United States of America for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 31st of July 2019."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 119 (Thursday, June 20, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 37222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-14751]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9826-7; CERCLA-04-2013-3761]

Columbia Organic Chemical Company Site, Columbia, Richland 
County, South Carolina; Notice of Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under 122(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency has entered into a settlement with 
Stephen Reichlyn concerning the Columbia Organic Chemical Company 
Superfund Site located in Columbia, Richland County, South Carolina. 
The settlement addresses cost incurred by the agency in conducting a 
fund lead Removal.

DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until 
July 22, 2013. The Agency will consider all comments received and may 
modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received 
disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from EPA's 
Environmental Protection Specialist, Ms. Paula V. Painter. Submit your 
comments by site name Columbia Organic Chemical Company by one of the 
following methods:
    www.epa.gov/region4/superfund/programs/enforcement/enforcement.html.
     Email. Painter.Paula@epa.gov.
     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Attn: Paula V. 
Painter, Superfund Division, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 
30303.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

    Dated: May 6, 2013.
Anita L. Davis,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Superfund 
Division.
[FR Doc. 2013-14751 Filed 6-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5226 

To repeal certain tax provisions of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2006 

Ms. DEGETTE (for herself and Mr. MARKEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To repeal certain tax provisions of the Energy Policy Act 

of 2005. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Fairness Act 

5 of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CERTAIN TAX PROVISIONS OF THE EN7 ERGY POLICY ACT OF 2005. 

8 (a) REPEAL.—The following provisions, and amend9 ments made by such provisions, of the Energy Policy Act 

10 of 2005 are hereby repealed: 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5226 IH 

1 (1) Section 1321 (relating to extension of credit 

2 for producing fuel from nonconventional source for 

3 facilities producing coke or coke gas). 

4 (2) Section 1323 (relating to temporary expens5 ing for equipment used in refining of liquid fuels). 

6 (3) Section 1324 (relating to pass through to 

7 owners of deduction for capital costs incurred by 

8 small refiner cooperatives in complying with Envi9 ronmental Protection Agency sulfur regulations). 

10 (4) Section 1325 (relating to natural gas dis11 tribution lines treated as 15-year property). 

12 (5) Section 1326 (relating to natural gas gath13 ering lines treated as 7-year property). 

14 (6) Section 1327 (relating to non-application of 

15 arbitrage rules to prepayments for natural gas). 

16 (7) Section 1328 (relating to determination of 

17 small refiner exception to oil depletion deduction). 

18 (8) Section 1329 (relating to amortization of 

19 geological and geophysical expenditures). 

20 (b) ADMINISTRATION OF INTERNAL REVENUE CODE

21 OF 1986.—The Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be 

22 applied and administered as if the provisions, and amend23 ments, specified in subsection (a) had never been enacted. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 20

- 00245

- CV

I N THE G UARDIANSHIP OF J AMES

A LTON T ITUS

, AN I NCAPACITATED

P ERSON §

§

§

§ On Appeal from Probate Court No. 1

of Ta rrant County ( 2018

- GD00180

- 1 )

September 30, 2021

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the ju dgment of t he trial

court is reversed and we render a judgment that the order granting the bill of review

and the corrected order ar e void due to lack of jurisdiction, that these orders are

vacated, and that the bill of review proceeding is dismissed.

It is further ord ered that appellee Simmons Bank shall pay all of the costs of

this appeal , for which let exe cution issue.SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By __ /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

________________ Chief Justice Bonnie SudderthOPINION INFORMATION TO PUBLISH ERS



## From the Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

CASE DOCKET NUMBER: 02

- 20

- 00245

- CV

NAME OF CASE: IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF

JAMES ALTON TITUS, AN

INCAPACITATED PERSON

DATE OPINION FILED: SEPTEMBER 30 , 2 0 21

DATE REHEARING FILED:

TRIAL COURT: PROBATE COURT NO. 1

TRIAL COURT JUDGE: HON. CHRIS PONDER

COUNTY: TARRANT

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: THOMAS F. HARKINS, JR.

WHITAKER, CHALK, SWINDLE &

SCHWARTZ PLLC

FO RT WORTH, T X

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: DAVID BAKUTIS

R . DY ANN MCCULLY

BETH HAMPTON

FORT WORTH, TX
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 th
 WITNESSETH
    ARTICLE I  EMPLOYMENT AND DUTIES
 SECTION 1.1. Position and Responsibilities
 SECTION 1.2. Acceptance
 SECTION 1.3. Exclusive Service
 ARTICLE II  TERM
 SECTION 2.1. Term




---



##### 



ARTICLE III  COMPENSATION
 SECTION 3.1. Basic Salary
 SECTION 3.2. Bonus; Equity Incentives
   SECTION 3.3. Pro-ration and Payment of Taxes
 SECTION 3.4. Benefits
 SECTION 3.5. Vacations
 SECTION 3.6. Expenses
 ARTICLE IV  TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT
 SECTION 4.1. General
 SECTION 4.2. Death or Disability
  2




---



##### 



SECTION 4.3. Cause
 SECTION 4.4. Other Than For Cause
  SECTION 4.5. Extension
 SECTION 4.6. Satisfaction of Liabilities
 SECTION 4.7. Assistance to Company
 SECTION 4.8. Change in Control
  3




---



##### 



ARTICLE V  COVENANTS AND REPRESENTATIONS
 SECTION 5.1. Proprietary Matters Agreement
 SECTION 5.2. Enforcement
 SECTION 5.3. Representation
 ARTICLE VI  MISCELLANEOUS
 SECTION 6.1. Voluntary Nature
 SECTION 6.2. Notice
 SECTION 6.3. Non-Assignability
 SECTION 6.4. Applicable Law
 SECTION 6.5. Effect of Prior Agreements
 SECTION 6.6. Severability
  4




---



##### 



SECTION 6.7. Absence of Waiver
 SECTION 6.8. Arbitration
 SECTION 6.9. I.R.C. §409A.
 SECTION 6.10. Counterparts
 [Remainder of Page Left Blank Intentionally]
  5




---



##### 



Company:
    LINDSAY CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Richard W. ParodName:
    Richard W. ParodTitle:
    President and CEOExecutive:
    /s/ Steve CotariuName:
    Steve Cotariu  6




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A TO LINDSAY CORPORATION
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT  I.R.C. § 409A
  Termination of Employment .
   Release and Timing of Termination Payments .
 Required Delay in Payment for Specified Employees" .
 Reimbursements .
 No Liability of Company .
  7
No. 09-8335.

#### Vance Jackson, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 963, 130 S. Ct. 1544,

176 L. Ed. 2d 152,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1055.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.