alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6553

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DION THOMAS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (CR-00-176-F; CA-04-864-F)

Submitted: September 28, 2005 Decided: December 8, 2005

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dion Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas B. Murphy, Assistant United

States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

Rehearing granted, March 8, 2006
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Dion Thomas seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Thomas has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
----

----

**Exhibit      10.44**

**EMPLOYMENT      AGREEMENT**

**1.              Employment**

**2.         Nature of      Employment**

**3.              Term**

----

**4.              Compensation**

**5.              Executive Benefits**

----

**6.              Termination Date; Consequences for Compensation and      Benefits**

----

**7.              Indemnification**

**8.              Agreement Not to Solicit **

**9.              Confidential Information, Non-Competition & Conflict of      Interest**

**10.            Rules and Regulations**

| (i)   | Confidentiality, Inventions, and                Non-Competition Agreement     |
|-------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (ii)  | Code of Business Conduct &                Ethics                                              |
| (iii) | Whistleblower Policy                                                                              |
| (iv)  | Paid Time Off                                                                                     |
| (v)   | Sexual Harassment & Discrimination                                                            |
| (vi)  | Insider Trading &                Confidentiality                                              |
| (vii) | Computer, Telephone, &                Email.                                                  |

**11.            Arbitration**

----

**12.            Miscellaneous**

| **ULURU                    DELAWARE INC.,** |                                   | **Executive** |   |
|---------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|---------------|--------|
|                                        |                                   |          |   |   |   |
| By:                                         | /s/                    Kerry P. Gray   |          | By:    | /s/                    Renaat Van den Hooff |   |
|                                        |                                   |          |   |   |   |
| Name:                                       | Kerry                    P. Gray       |          | Name:  | Renaat                    Van den Hooff |   |
|                                        |                                   |          |   |   |   |
| Title:                                      | President                    & CEO |          | Title: | EVP                    – Operations |   |
|                                        |                                   |          |   |   |   |
| Date:                                       | September                    25, 2007  |          | Date:  | September                    25, 2007 |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      13,958,201
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                159,209,293
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    380,160,315
<ALLOWANCE>                                  5,942,377
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             559,725,800
<DEPOSITS>                                 470,743,092
<SHORT-TERM>                                42,330,560
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          5,062,044
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       948,754
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,641,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             559,725,800
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             29,899,157
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            9,739,761
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            39,638,918
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          20,450,873
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          22,305,224
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       17,333,694
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  980,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            (55,434)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              8,821,109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,406,878
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   8,406,878
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,725,878
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.93
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.59
<LOANS-NON>                                    217,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   237,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             4,960,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            5,942,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         3,058,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      2,884,000
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10243-10244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5026]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Revised Record of Decision for Hawaii Range Complex

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy (Navy) announces its decision to 
revise the Record of Decision (ROD) issued on June 26, 2008, and 
published on July 7, 2008 (73 FR 38424) on the Final Environmental 
Impact Statement (EIS)/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (OEIS) 
for the Hawaii Range Complex (HRC). These revisions address the 
authorizations recently issued by the National Marine Fisheries Service 
(NMFS) in December 2008 and January 2009 under the Marine Mammal 
Protection Act (MMPA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for the 
incidental harassment of marine mammals resulting from Navy training 
and Department of Defense (DoD) research, development, testing, and 
evaluation (RDT&E) activities conducted within the HRC for the proposed 
action presented in Alternative 3.
    The Revised ROD is effective February 26, 2009. Except as discussed 
in the Revised ROD, all other provisions of the June 26, 2008 ROD 
remain in full force and effect. Implementation of the preferred 
alternative, initiated in June 2008 will continue. Because the Navy is 
required by section 5062 of Title 10 of the United States Code to 
organize, train, equip, and maintain combat-ready forces, ongoing 
training and RDT&E activities within the HRC will continue at current 
levels in the event that the proposed action is not implemented.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Revised ROD has been distributed to all 
those individuals who requested a copy of the Final EIS/OEIS and 
agencies and organizations that received a copy of the Final EIS/OEIS. 
The full text of the Revised ROD is available for public viewing at 
http://www.govsupport.us/navynepahawaii/downloads.aspx. Single copies 
of the Revised ROD will be made available upon request by contacting 
the Public Affairs Officer, Pacific Missile Range Facility, Attn: HRC 
EIS/OEIS REVISED ROD, P.O. Box 128, Kekaha, Hawaii 96752-0128; e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a3c5c6cad0fccbd1c0e3c4ccd5d0d6d3d3ccd1d78dd6d0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0264676b715d6a706142656d74717772726d70762c7771">[email protected]</span></a>; or calling the Public Affairs Officer at 
telephone: 866-767-3347.


[[Page 10244]]


    Dated: March 4, 2009.
A.M. Vallandingham,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate Generals Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal 
Register Liaison Officer.
 [FR Doc. E9-5026 Filed 3-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
STATE v. Brandon Leon WILSON

260P19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 17, 2019

Brandon Leon Wilson, For Wilson, Brandon Leon.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Mike Miller, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd of July 2019 by Defendant for Judicial Review:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of July 2019."
No. 09-9397.

#### Marquise Leon Flewellen, Petitioner v. Dolan Waller, Warden, et al.

559 U.S. 1097, 130 S. Ct. 2383,

176 L. Ed. 2d 776,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3499.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 09-9552.

#### Carlos Andres Monsalve, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1080, 130 S. Ct. 2119,

176 L. Ed. 2d 744,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3344.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 342 Fed. Appx. 451.
No. 09-9789.

#### Kevin Smith, Petitioner v. Department of Justice, et al.

559 U.S. 1099, 130 S. Ct. 2389,

176 L. Ed. 2d 780,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3632.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Elizabeth LUKE as Guardian ad Litem, For Jane Doe (a minor), Plaintiff, v. WOODLAWN SCHOOL, J. Robert Shirley individually and as Agent for Woodlawn School, and The Woodlawn School Board of Trustees, Defendants.

No. COA18-1109

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 4, 2019

AFFIRMED IN PART. DISMISSED IN PART.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 4, 2012

p0827

Order 

September 4, 2012

145053

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145053

COA: 300128

Shiawassee CC: 10-000071-FH

NATHAN ALBERT SAUNDERS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 19, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350

UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Eddie R. Brown, certify that:



1.
        I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of XRG, Inc.;




2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
        The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)
        Other than as disclosed in Item 3, designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;




5.
        The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a)
        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




(b)
        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.






Date: January 3, 2006
        
        
        /s/ Eddie R. BrownEddie R. BrownChief Executive Officer, Presidentand Director


---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration # 11683]

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) declaration for the State of New Hampshire dated: 03/05/2009.

*Incident:*                         Severe Ice Storm.                    

*Incident Period:*                         12/11/2008.                    

*Effective Date:*                         03/05/2009.                    

*Eidl Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         12/05/2009.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for economic injury disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations.

*The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster:*

*Primary Counties:*                    Grafton, Hillsborough, Merrimack, Rockingham, Strafford.                

*Contiguous Counties:*

New Hampshire: Belknap, Carroll, Cheshire Coos, Sullivan.

Massachusetts: Essex, Middlesex, Worcester.

Maine: York.

Vermont: Caledonia, Essex,  Orange,  Windsor.

*The Interest Rate is:*                     4.000.                

The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 116830.

The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are New Hampshire, Massachusets, Maine, Vermont.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59002)

Dated: March 5, 2009.

Darryl K. Hairston,

Acting Administrator.

[FR Doc. E9-5158 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5074 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 26, 2006 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

AN ACT 

To amend the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 to provide 

for continued payment of railroad retirement annuities 

by the Department of the Treasury, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

HR 5074 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Railroad Retirement 

3 Technical Improvement Act of 2006’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DISBURSEMENT AGENT. 

5 Section 7(b)(4) of the Railroad Retirement Act of 

6 1974 (45 U.S.C. 231f(b)(4)) is amended so that subpara7 graph (A) reads as follows: 

8 ‘‘(A) The Secretary of the Treasury shall 

9 serve as the disbursing agent for benefits pay10 able under this Act, under such rules and regu11 lations as the Secretary may in the Secretary’s 

12 discretion prescribe.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 2006. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
M A N D A T E

TO THE PROBATE COURT NO. 1 OF EL PASO COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Eighth District of Texas, on March 9, 2018, the cause upon

appeal to revise or reverse your judgment

IN THE MATTER OF THE TEMPORARY

GUARDIANSHIP OF THE PERSON AND

ESTATE OF EDUARDO FUENTES

VARELA, AN ADULT,

No. 08-17-00160-CV

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

The Court has considered this cause on the Appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal and

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed. We therefore

dismiss the appeal. We further order Appellant pay all costs of this appeal, and this decision be

certified below for observance.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of

Appeals for the Eighth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized,

obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Clerk of the Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of

El Paso, this May 24, 2018

.

Denise Pacheco, Clerk

Trial Court No. 2016-CGD00220
EVERETT'S LAKE CORPORATION v. Lewis Edward DYE, Jr.

No. 415P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Steven C. Lawrence, Attorney at Law, Fayetteville, for Everett's Lake Corporation.

Lewis Edward Dye, Jr., for Dye, Lewis Edward (Jr.).

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th of November 2018 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
May 3, 2012 

Captain Maurice J. Montgomery 

Manager, Flight Operations 

United Airlines, Inc. 

233 South Wacker Drive 

Chicago, IL 60606 

Dear Capt. Montgomery: 

This is in response to your January 5, 2012, letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA-2005-

22158) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of United Airlines, Inc. 

(United) for an exemption from § 121.619 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow United, its certified dispatchers, and its 

pilots in command (PIC) to dispatch flights to domestic airports at which for at least 1 hour 

before and 1 hour after the estimated time of arrival at the destination airport, the appropriate 

weather reports or forecasts, or any combination of them, indicate the ceiling may be reduced 

from at least 2000 feet to 1000 feet above the airport elevation and visibility may be reduced 

from at least 3 statute miles to 2 statute miles. 

On December 21, 2011, United Continental Holdings, Inc. in Exemption No. 8653E 

(United/Continental) was granted the relief you seek. That exemption included the 

conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 8657, as amended. In addition, Exemption 

No. 8653E combined Exemption Nos. 8653 and 9621, and included all of the provisions and 

limitations of Operations Specification C355 (exemption to § 121.619 for domestic 

destination alternate airport requirements). A copy of this exemption is enclosed for your 

information. 
2

Because the relief you seek is now covered under exemption No. 8653, as amended, we will 

take no further action on your petition. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles for, 

John M. Allen 

Director, Flight Standards Service 

Enclosure