alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Montrez Benjamin WILLIAMS

No. 233PA12-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2019

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

Kathryn L. VandenBerg, Assistant Appellant Defender, For Williams, Montrez Benjamin *22***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 3rd of October 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd of October 2018 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of October 2018 by State of NC to Dismiss Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
No. 09-9168.

#### Leslie Redmond, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1023, 130 S. Ct. 1926,

176 L. Ed. 2d 395,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2500.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
The STATE, Respondent, v. Jo PRADUBSRI, Petitioner.

Appellate Case No. 2017-002061 Opinion No. 27890

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Heard May 8, 2019 Filed May 22, 2019

Appellate Defender Joanna Katherine Delany, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, and Solicitor Samuel R. Hubbard III, of Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

**9We granted Jo Pradubsri's petition for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the court of appeals affirming his conviction.

**10*State v. Pradubsri* , 420 S.C. 629, 803 S.E.2d 724 (Ct. App. 2017). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

**DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.**

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW, JJ., and Acting Justice Roger L. Couch, concur.
EXHIBIT 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oxford Ventures, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel K. Leonard,
President,  CFO and CEO of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



Date : August 15, 2005

/s/ Daniel K. Leonard
---------------------
   Daniel K. Leonard
   President and CFO
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4971 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4971

  To amend title 5, United States Code, to exempt certain individuals 
 under the Civil Service Retirement System from the requirement to pay 
interest on the repayment of amounts received as refunds of retirement 
contributions as a condition of receiving credit under such System for 
                   the service covered by the refund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2006

Mr. Van Hollen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
  Committee on Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on 
House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 5, United States Code, to exempt certain individuals 
 under the Civil Service Retirement System from the requirement to pay 
interest on the repayment of amounts received as refunds of retirement 
contributions as a condition of receiving credit under such System for 
                   the service covered by the refund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``CSRS Retirement Repayment Technical 
Correction Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS FROM REQUIREMENT TO PAY 
              INTEREST ON REPAYMENT OF RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION REFUNDS 
              UNDER CSRS.

    (a) In General.--Section 8334(d)(1) of title 5, United States Code, 
is amended by striking ``with interest'' and inserting the following: 
``with interest, except that an employee or Member who received a 
refund during the period beginning on October 1, 1990, and ending on 
February 28, 1991, may deposit the amount received without interest''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of the Omnibus Budget 
Reconciliation Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-508).
                                 <all>
```
Debra JONES, Employee v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, Employer, and Old Republic Insurance Company, Carrier

No. 430P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Cedric R. Perry, Attorney at Law, Rocky Mount, For Jones, Debra.

H. George Kurani, Charlotte, Veronica Fleury, Asheville, Attorneys at Law, For Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 10th of December 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of January 2019 by Plaintiff to Consider Petition for Writ of Certiorari as a Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."
EPA Reg. No. 84229-3

Vol. 1 – part 2
No. 09-7870.

#### Ronnie Lee Gardner, Petitioner v. Hank Galetka, Warden.

559 U.S. 993, 130 S. Ct. 1737,

176 L. Ed. 2d 215,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2235.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 568 F.3d 862.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

EVAN M. STUMP,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D2024-0525

May 22, 2024

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for

Manatee County; Lon Arend, Judge.

Evan M. Stump, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
***********************

 * MONOGRAPH NO: 5A6

 ***********************

ITEM: Stuffing, Shelf Stable, Cooked (BRS)

NSN: 8940-01-470-9840 ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR-B-027 Can

 8940-01-471-6857 PCR-B-028 Poly

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Dense light to medium tan stuffing; pieces of celery and onion; black pepper 

specks

ODOR: Onion; mild poultry

FLAVOR: Mild sage, onion, mild poultry seasoning, celery; slightly salty, slightly bland; cooked 

bread; slightly bitter

TEXTURE: Dense, moist, pasty, cohesive; bread pudding-like

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36 months

 100 DEGREES F: 6 months

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

Appearance: Darkened

Odor: Thermally processed; oxidized; stale bread

Flavor: Loss of spice and seasoning; rancid

Texture: Pastier, rubbery, caramelized

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6740

JAMES L. JACK,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL L. CHAPMAN, Sheriff, LCSO; SEAN DIKEMAN, #2233, 

Deputy, LCSO; LIMA, Deputy, LCSO,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 15-7179

JAMES L. JACK,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL L. CHAPMAN, Sheriff, LCSO; SEAN DIKEMAN, #2233, 

Deputy, LCSO; LIMA, Deputy, LCSO,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior

District Judge. (3:14-cv-00390-JRS-RCY)

Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 22, 2015
2

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James L. Jack, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

James L. Jack appeals from the district court’s orders 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without 

prejudice for failure to particularize his complaint. Regarding 

No. 15-6740, after Jack filed his notice of appeal, the district 

court vacated the order to afford Jack extra time to respond. 

As the challenged order is no longer in force, we dismiss the 

appeal as moot. Turning to No. 15-7179, because Jack may refile 

his suit in district court with a particularized complaint, the 

dismissal order is interlocutory and not appealable. See Domino 

Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 

1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal as 

well. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      18,262,969
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            11,000,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                184,583,020
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    578,369,916
<ALLOWANCE>                                  8,145,982
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             801,627,976
<DEPOSITS>                                 663,066,447
<SHORT-TERM>                                72,016,334
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          8,122,982
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,008,204
<OTHER-SE>                                  57,414,009
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             801,627,976
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             43,725,781
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           11,841,681
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            55,567,462
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          29,022,126
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          31,750,923
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       23,816,539
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                1,230,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              63,555
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             12,534,250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,733,692
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  11,733,692
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,928,692
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.89
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.43
<LOANS-NON>                                    149,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   421,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             6,947,377
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   36,000
<RECOVERIES>                                     5,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            8,145,982
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         4,383,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      3,763,000
        

</TABLE>
No. 09-9053.

#### Brian Lee Deneui, Petitioner v. South Dakota.

559 U.S. 1041, 130 S. Ct. 2072,

176 L. Ed. 2d 422,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2797.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Dakota denied.

Same case below, 775 N.W.2d 221.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 49 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1300 North Frontage Road West in Vail, Colorado, as the ‘‘Gerald 

R. Ford, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. UDALL of Colorado introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1300 North Frontage Road West in Vail, 

Colorado, as the ‘‘Gerald R. Ford, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GERALD R. FORD, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 1300 North Frontage Road West 

6 in Vail, Colorado, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Gerald R. Ford, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 49 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Gerald R. Ford, Jr. 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zaldiva, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), we, Nicole Leigh Van Coller, President, and Robert B. Lees, CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:  (1)  The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date:August 14 , 2008By:/s/ Nicole Leigh Van CollerNicole Leigh Van CollerPresident and DirectorDate:August 14 , 2008By:/s/Robert B. LeesRobert B. LeesCFO and Director
STATE of North Carolina, v. Antonio Lyndell FORNEY, Defendant.

No. COA18-418

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 4, 2019

NO ERROR.
STATE v. Robert H. JOHNSON

174P18-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Robert S. Banks, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Robert H. Johnson, for Johnson, Robert Harold.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th of February 2019 by Defendant for a Rehearing:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
| 1.   | The      Quarterly Report of the Companies on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended      November 28, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission      (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Companies. |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                           |                                       |   |   |
|--------|--------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |                           |                                       |
|   | /s/      KRIS G. RADHAKRISHNAN |                                       |
|   | Name:                | Kris G. Radhakrishnan                      |   |
|   | Title:               | Chief Financial Officer and      Treasurer |   |
|   |                           |  (principal financial      officer)   |   |
|   |
STATE of North Carolina v. Raymond Warren FOSTER, Jr.

No. COA18-975

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 2, 2019

AFFIRMED IN PART. REVERSED IN PART. REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.
Exhibit 10.45



 Exhibit 10.45 
 Dominion Resources, Inc. 
 Non-Employee Directors’ Annual
Compensation 
 As of December 31, 2010 

 

			
	 Annual Retainer
	  	 Amount

	 Service as Director
	  	$150,000 ($60,000 cash; $90,000 stock)
	 Service as Audit Committee or Compensation, Governance

and Nominating Committee Chair
	  	$15,000
	 Service as Finance and Risk Oversight Committee Chair
	  	$ 7,500
		
	 Meeting Fees
	  	 
	 Board meetings
	  	$2,000 per meeting
	 Committee meetings
	  	$2,000 per meeting
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICEROF PACIFIC ENERGY MANAGEMENT LLCPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350 and in connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 that is being filedconcurrently with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned officer of Pacific Energy Management LLC,general partner of Pacific Energy GP, LP which is the general partner ofPacific Energy Partners, L.P. and its subsidiaries (the “Partnership”) herebycertifies that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|        | /s/ GERALD A.  TYWONIUK |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Gerald A. Tywoniuk      |
|   | November 14, 2005  |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Pacific Energy Partners, L.P., andwill be retained by Pacific Energy Partners, L.P., and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5169 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5169

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1310 Highway 64 NW. in Ramsey, Indiana, as the ``Wilfred Edward 
                `Cousin Willie' Sieg, Sr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WILFRED EDWARD ``COUSIN WILLIE'' SIEG, SR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1310 Highway 64 NW. in Ramsey, Indiana, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Wilfred Edward `Cousin Willie' Sieg, Sr. Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Wilfred 
Edward `Cousin Willie' Sieg, Sr. Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 12, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5169

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1310 Highway 64 NW. in Ramsey, Indiana, as the ``Wilfred Edward 
                `Cousin Willie' Sieg, Sr. Post Office''.
```
1 

### Cole, Jeffrey D.

From: Straight, Dan [DanS@RP-L.com]

Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 10:56 AM

To: Cole, Jeffrey D.

Subject: FW: Dates for control device installations Part I data

Attachments: WWValley.xls

-----Original Message-----

From: Straight, Dan

Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 12:49 PM

To: 'EUMACTICRSupport@rti.org'

Subject: FW: Dates for control device installations Part I data

-----Original Message-----

From: EUMACTICR Support [mailto:EUMACTICRSupport@rti.org]

Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 6:41 PM

To: Straight, Dan

Subject: Dates for control device installations Part I data

Dan,

Could you please look at the attached spreadsheet and enter the dates (Month/Year) in Column C telling EPA when

these controls (or control additives) in Column L (or M, if the description is listed there) can online. You can fill in the

spreadsheet and email it back. Please reference your Part I data entry. These date data weren't included in your Part I

submittal so please get me this information as soon as practicable. Thanks.

Jeff,

EU MACT ICR Support Team

RTI International

eumacticrsupport@rti.org

1

‐ 800

‐ 957

‐ 6436facility_id configuration_id Config_Date Config_prior_to_test legal_owner_name plant_name component_id order component_type port_near control_group control_type control_other control_online1040 001 no CityofRichmond WhitewaterValley PM‐ESP1 3 PMcontrol PMcontrol Electrostaticprecipitator,unspecified 1/11/19741040 001 no CityofRichmond WhitewaterValley NOx‐SNR1 2 NOxcontrol NOxcontrol SelectiveNoncatalyticReduction 3/1/20041040 001 no CityofRichmond WhitewaterValley PM‐BH 4 PMcontrol PMcontrol FabricFilter,unspecified 1/6/20091040 002 no CityofRichmond WhitewaterValley PM‐ESP2 3 PMcontrol PMcontrol Electrostaticprecipitator,unspecified 5/16/19731040 002 no CityofRichmond WhitewaterValley PM‐BH 4 PMcontrol PMcontrol FabricFilter,unspecified 1/6/20091040 002 no CityofRichmond WhitewaterValley NOx‐SNR2 2 NOxcontrol NOxcontrol SelectiveNoncatalyticReduction 9/1/2003