alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5179 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure adequate payment 

amounts for drugs and biologicals under part B of the Medicare Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2006 

Mr. HALL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways 

and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure 

adequate payment amounts for drugs and biologicals 

under part B of the Medicare Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REVISION OF PAYMENT METHODOLOGY FOR 

4 DRUGS AND BIOLOGICALS UNDER MEDICARE 

5 PART B. 

6 (a) FLOOR OF WIDELY AVAILABLE MARKET

7 PRICE.—Subsection (b) of section 1847A of the Social Se8 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–3a) is amended— 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5179 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘paragraph 

2 (6) and’’ after ‘‘Subject to’’; and 

3 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

4 paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(6) FLOOR OF WIDELY AVAILABLE MARKET

6 PRICE.—The Secretary shall increase the payment 

7 amount determined under this subsection for a drug 

8 or biological to the extent necessary to ensure that 

9 such payment amount is in no case less than the 

10 widely available market price for the drug or biologi11 cal (as determined under subsection (d) or by the 

12 Secretary).’’. 

13 (b) TREATMENT OF PROMPT PAY DISCOUNTS.—Sub14 section (c)(3) of such section is amended— 

15 (1) in the first sentence, by inserting ‘‘fur16 nished to physicians’’ after ‘‘prompt pay discounts’’; 

17 and 

18 (2) in the second sentence, by inserting ‘‘(other 

19 than prompt pay discounts)’’ after ‘‘other price con20 cessions’’. 

21 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

22 this section shall apply to drugs and biologicals that are 

23 furnished on or after January 1, 2007. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5169 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5169

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
1310 Highway 64 NW. in Ramsey, Indiana, as the ``Wilfred Edward `Cousin 
                    Willie' Sieg, Sr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. WILFRED EDWARD ``COUSIN WILLIE'' SIEG, SR. POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1310 Highway 64 NW. in Ramsey, Indiana, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Wilfred Edward `Cousin Willie' Sieg, Sr. Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Wilfred 
Edward `Cousin Willie' Sieg, Sr. Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00306-CV

Dr. Rolando Posada

v.

Dr. Juan M. Garcia

On Appeal from the

445th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2011-DCL-5265-I

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 30, 2014
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6835

ARTHUR MCDORN WILLIAMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Charles M.

Condon,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CA-95-3556-19BD)

Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 19, 1996

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur McDorn Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka,

Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.

104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. Appellant's case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Appellant

that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could

waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the

recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to

the magistrate judge's recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's

recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the

substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review

by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. We

accordingly deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD (DNFSB): Service Contract Inventory Rep

PSC

Product or

Service Code

(PSC) Description

Contracting

Agency

Contracting

Department

Funding Agency

Place of 

Performance City

State

Country

Date Signed

D301

IT AND TELECOM- FACILITY OPERATION AND MAINT. DNFSB NA DNFSB WASHINGTON DC US 7/26/2013

NOT AVAILABLCOMPETITION 

D304

IT AND TELECOM- TELE. & TRANSMISSION DNFSB NA DNFSB WASHINGTON DC US 10/5/2012

FULL AND OPECOMPETITION

D399

IT AND TELECOM - OTHER IT AND TELECOM DNFSB NA DNFSB WASHINGTON DC US 10/1/2012

FULL AND OPECOMPETITION

D399

IT AND TELECOM- OTHER IT AND TELECOMM. DNFSB NA DNFSB WASHINGTON DC US 10/4/2012

FULL AND OPECOMPETITION

R405

SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: OPERATIONS DNFSB NA DNFSB WASHINGTON DC US 11/1/2012 NOT COMPETE

R425

ENGINEERING & TECHNICAL SERVICES DNFSB NA DNFSB OAKTON VA US 12/10/2012 NOT COMPETE

R431

SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: HUMAN RESOURCES DNFSB NA DNFSB ROCKVILLE MD US 9/18/2013

FULL AND OPECOMPETITION

R699

OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SVCS DNFSB NA DNFSB WASHINGTON DC US 1/9/2013

FULL & OPEN CAFTER EXCL. O

R699

OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SVCS DNFSB NA DNFSB WASHINGTON DC US 5/1/2013

FULL AND OPECOMPETITION

R704 AUDITING SERVICES DNFSB NA DNFSB WASHINGTON DC US 3/19/2013

FULL AND OPECOMPETITION

S113

TELEPHONE AND-OR COMMMUNICATIONS DNFSB NA DNFSB WASHINGTON DC US 10/1/2012

FULL AND OPECOMPETITION

V213 RAIL PASSENGER SERVICES DNFSB NA DNFSB WASHINGTON DC US 10/1/2012 NOT COMPETEV213 RAIL PASSENGER SERVICES DNFSB NA DNFSB WASHINGTON DC US 4/14/2013 NOT COMPETE
tunity/

ed Sources

Type of Contract Description of Requirement Vendor Name Action Obligation PIID Referenced IDV PIID

TIME AND MATERIALS

IT & ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES VMD SYSTEMS INTEGRATORS $1,543,443.00 DNFSB13C102 1183

FIRM FIXED PRICE MTIP INTERNET CONNECTION

MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES INCORPORATED $90,000.00 OGM13029 GS00T07NSD0008 0207

FIRM FIXED PRICE WIRLELESS PHONE SERVICE

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP DBA VERIZON WIRELESS $88,464.76 OGM13020 GS35F0119P 9689

FIRM FIXED PRICE

FINANCIAL SYSTEM SOFTWARE LICENSE & SYSTEM HOSTING SYMPLICITY CORPORATION $26,440.58 OGM13024 GS35F0440M 0244

LABOR HOURS

ADVISORY AND ASSISTANCE SERVICES PUSATERI, KENNETH M $48,817.50 OGM13030 1877

LABOR HOURS STUDY REVIEW

BUTTONWOOD CONSULTING INC $40,000.00 OGM13032 1597

LABOR HOURS

UPDATE HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MRF CONSULTING LLC $48,350.00 OGM13050 GS15F0049L 9698

TIME AND MATERIALS IT SERVICES/SUPPORT

ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SERVICES, INCORPORATED $67,343.48 DNFSB08096 8775

LABOR HOURS TEMPORARY SECRETARIAL SUPPORT NRI, INC. $40,108.40 OGM13037 GS07F0514Y 0726FIRM FIXED PRICE

INDEPENDENT AUDIT OF FY 2013 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

LANI EKO AND COMPANY CPAS PLLC $84,199.00 OGM11041 GS23F0016T 1993

FIRM FIXED PRICE TELEPHONE SERVICES

LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC $50,000.00 OGM11046 GS11T08BJD6002 0730

FIRM FIXED PRICE TRANSIT SUBSIDY PROGRAM

WASHINGTON METRO. AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY $125,000.00 OGM13011 0488

FIRM FIXED PRICE TRANSIT SUBSIDY PROGRAM

WASHINGTON METRO. AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY $25,000.00 OGM13011 0488
PROPST BROS. DISTS., INC., Plaintiff v. SHREE KAMNATH CORP., Defendant and McDonalds Corp., Third-Party Intervenor

No. 69P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2019

R. Kenneth Helms, Jr., Stephen M. Bennett, Attorneys at Law, Monroe, For Shree Kamnath Corp.

Kip David Nelson, Greensboro, Matthew Nis Leerberg, Raleigh, Attorneys at Law, For Propst Bros. Dists., Inc.

Mark P. Henriques, Charlotte, Michael A. ingersoll, Attorneys at Law, For McDonalds Corp.

***AMENDED ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th of February 2019 by 3rd Party in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*156"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."
No. 09-9682.

#### Guy Salom, aka Roberto Falcon, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1083, 130 S. Ct. 2130,

176 L. Ed. 2d 751,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3197.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 349 Fed. Appx. 409.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zaldiva, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), we, Nicole Leigh Van Coller, President, and Christopher Ebersole, CFO and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:  (1)  The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date:May 14, 2008By:/s/ Nicole Leigh Van CollerNicole Leigh Van CollerPresident and DirectorDate:May 14, 2008By:/s/Christopher EbersoleChristopher EbersoleCFO, Treasurer and Director
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Nikolas Antonopoulos, President and Chief Executive Officer of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp.,certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date:  July 29, 2005 By:  /s/   *Nikolas Antonopoulos*        Nikolas Antonopoulos
# l£,324-0U> CAUSE NO. 0628183-D OILN RAY NOWLIN 

### APPLICANT/PRO SE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPLEAS

VS 

# OFtMPs1"10^0!^

THE STATE OF TEXAS RESPONDANT CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN TEXAT
MOTION FOR A REQUEST FOR' A1WRITEN .OPINION TO THE HONORABLE PRESIDING JUDGE KELLER 

# COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS FEB 172015 

# AbelAcosla,Cleric NOW COME SAID APPLICANT OLIN"'RAY NOWEIN/PRO SEE IN THE ABOVE STYLED NUMBERED 0628183-D AND SUBMITS HIS.MOTION FOR A REQUr EST FOR A WRITEN OPINION THE:'APPLICANT FILES WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY ON RECORD THE APPLICANT FILE AN MOTION'.FOR OBJECTIONS OF THE LOWER STATE 

### COUET NO. #2 REPLY THIS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS RETURN , ITS REPLY TO THE APPLICANT DENYING HIS MOTION AND SUCCESSIVE WRIT WITHOUT ANY CONCLUSION OF LAW FOR TOKDENIED THE APPLI CANT MOTION AND PETITION WITHOUT ANY WRITEN OPINION,RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED OLIN RAY NOWLIN TDCJ-ID NO. #824386 MARK STILES UNIT BEAUMONT, TEXAS 77705

OLIN RAY NOWLIN

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT A TRUE AND CERRECT COPY 

### OF THE FOREGOING WAS MAILED:TO THE COURT CLERK TO PASS COPIES 

### TO THOSE THAT ARE. CONCERN UNDER 121;(2) A INMATE MAKES ONLY ONE COPY TO THE COURT AND REQUEST THEM TO-MAKE:1 COPIES FOR HIM -BE CAUSE OF HIM BEING INDIGENT AND NOT ABIE TO MAKE COPIES 

# SENTONTHIS/%_DAYOFfi^jhrtjtfLxsy , 2015 SIGNON THIS/l.DAYOF /^V/y/Ht/j/ 2015 

# SIGNATURECU^mp( (2)
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Gregory F. Kowal, Chief Executive Officer of Mera Pharmaceuticals, certify that (1) Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 3 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.



Date:   February 14, 2008

|                        | 
|----------------------- | 
|                        | 
|/s/ Gregory F. Kowal    | 
|Gregory F. Kowal        | 
|Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1



Astrotech International Corporation and Subsidiaries                Exhibit 11

                    Computation of Earnings per Common Share
             For the Years Ended September 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994
                   (Dollars in Thousands, Except Share Data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    1996           1995            1994
                                                                 ----------     ----------      -------
<S>                                                            <C>             <C>            <C>
EARNINGS PER COMMON AND DILUTIVE COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE

1.   Income from continuing operations                             $4,010         $2,731       $     796

2.   Weighted average shares outstanding                       10,108,397      9,886,296       9,157,393

3.   Income from continuing operations per
       common share (1 divided by 2)                              $   .40       $    .28      $      .09

4.   Income before cumulative effect of change in
      accounting principle                                          4,010          2,731             950

5.   Income before cumulative effect of change in
      accounting principle per common share
      (4 divided by 2)                                                .40            .28             .10

6.   Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle               -            -              2,931

7.   Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
       per common share (6 divided by 2)                               -            -                .32

8.   Net income                                                     4,010          2,731           3,881

9.   Net income per common share (8 divided by 2)                 $   .40        $   .28      $      .42
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended October 31, 2007 (the Form 10-KSB/A) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                   |     |                        
|------------------ | --- | -----------------------
|                   |     |                        
|Date March 3, 2008 | By: | /s/ Gregory F. Kowal   
|                   |     | Gregory F. Kowal       
|                   |     | Chief Executive Officer
|                   |     |                        



|                   |     |                                           
|------------------ | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                   |     |                                           
|Date March 3, 2008 | By: | /s/ Anthony E. Applebaum                  
|                   |     | Anthony E. Applebaum                      
|                   |     | Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
|                   |     |                                           



(ii) A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**














**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer of ULURU Inc.**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant**


**to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ULURU Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the
“Report”), the undersigned officer of ULURU INC. does hereby certify, pursuant
      to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
      (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1.)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2.)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.








Date:
                May 15, 2007
            
            /s/
                Kerry P. GrayKerry
                P. GrayPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer)