alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10237-10238]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5120]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1608]


Grant of Authority for Subzone Status, Wolverine World Wide, Inc. 
(Footwear and Apparel), Rockford, Cedar Springs and Howard City, MI

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for ``...the 
establishment... of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the United 
States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for other 
purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 
qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of 
entry;
    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR Part 400) provide for the 
establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities 
cannot serve the specific use involved, and when the activity results 
in significant public benefit and is in the public interest;
    Whereas, the Kent-Ottawa-Muskegon Foreign Trade Zone Authority, 
grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 189, has made application to the Board 
for authority to establish a special-purpose subzone at the footwear 
and apparel distribution and processing facilities of Wolverine World 
Wide, Inc., located in Rockford, Cedar Springs and Howard City, 
Michigan (FTZ Docket 47-2008, filed 8/25/08);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (73 FR 51440, 9/03/08); and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the 
application would be in the public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby grants authority for subzone 
status for activity related to footwear and apparel distribution and 
processing at the facilities of Wolverine World Wide, Inc., located in 
Rockford, Cedar Springs and Howard City, Michigan (Subzone 189C), as 
described in the application and Federal Register notice, and subject 
to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.

[[Page 10238]]

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of February 2009.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-5120 Filed 3-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Tiens Biotech Group (USA), Inc. (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the
undersigned, Jinyuan Li, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Registrant,
and Manbo He, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of and
for the period covered by the Report.





Pursuant
to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this
certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.





Date:
      August 14, 2009/s/Jinyuan
      LiJinyuan
      LiChief
      Executive Officer and President(Principal
      Executive Officer)Date:
      August 14, 2009/s/Manbo
      HeManbo HeChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Accounting and Financial
Officer)
UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

The Office of the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community

Releases Its Statement of ODNI’s Management and Performance 

Challenges for Fiscal Year 2023

(January 2024) The Office of the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) has 

issued what it considers to be the most significant management and performance challenges facing 

the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). The Inspector General’s Statement of 

ODNI’s Management and Performance Challenges — Fiscal Year 2023 drew upon IC IG’s body 

of work, as well as issues conveyed by ODNI senior leaders, Congress, and other oversight entities,

to identify four management and challenge areas and four risk areas for ODNI. 

The IC IG considers ODNI’s management and performance challenges to consist of the following 

areas (not presented in order of importance):

The IC IG identified the following ODNI risk areas (not presented in order of importance):

The management and performance challenges were also included in ODNI’s Fiscal Year 2023 

Agency Financial Report published in November 2023.

For more information about the IC IG, please contact IC_IG_PAO@dni.gov or visit the IC IG’s website: 

https://www.dni.gov/icig 

For career opportunities with the IC IG, please visit: 

https://www.dni.gov/careers 

To report allegations of waste, fraud, or abuse, please contact the IC IG Hotline: 

IC IG Hotline 855-731-3260 

ICIGHOTLINE@odni.gov
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5013]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Meeting of the Board of Advisors (BOA) to The 
President, Naval Postgraduate School (NPS)

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of The Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), notice is hereby given that the 
following meeting of the Board of Advisors to the President, Naval 
Postgraduate School will be held. This meeting will be open to the 
public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, April 28, 2009, from 8 a.m. 
to 4 p.m. and on Wednesday, April 29, 2009, from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. 
Pacific Time Zone.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Naval Postgraduate School, 1 
University Circle, Monterey, CA 93943-5001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jaye Panza, Naval Postgraduate 
School, Monterey, CA, 93943-5001, telephone number: 831-656-2514.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting is to elicit the 
advice of the Board on the Naval Service's Postgraduate Education 
Program and the collaborative exchange and partnership between NPS and 
the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT). The board examines the 
effectiveness with which the NPS is accomplishing its mission. To this 
end, the board will inquire into the curricula; instruction; physical 
equipment; administration; state of morale of the student body, 
faculty, and staff; fiscal affairs; and any other matters relating to 
the operation of the NPS as the board considers pertinent.
    Individuals without a DoD government/CAC card require an escort at 
the meeting location. For access, information, or to send written 
comments regarding the NPS BOA contact Ms. Jaye Panza, Naval 
Postgraduate School, 1 University Circle, Monterey, CA 93943-5001 or by 
fax: 831-656-3145 by April 15, 2009.

    Dated: March 4, 2009.
A.M. Vallandingham,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate Generals Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal 
Register Liaison Officer.
 [FR Doc. E9-5013 Filed 3-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
No. 09-922.

#### Dave Jordan, Petitioner v. Apache Corp., et al.

559 U.S. 1048, 130 S. Ct. 2347,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3052.

176 L. Ed. 2d 561,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 332 Fed. Appx. 992.
Elizabeth BALL, Employee, Plaintiff v. BAYADA HOME HEALTH CARE, Employer, Arch Insurance Group, Inc., Carrier (Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., Third-Party Administrator), Defendants.

No. COA18-918

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 26, 2019

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 10.2

SCHEDULE OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS PARTY TO THE

2007 CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT FILED AS EXHIBIT 10.1

Each of the parties identified below is party to a change in control agreement (2007 CIC Agreement) with Advanced Medical Optics, Inc.
substantially in the form of Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. for the quarter ended June 29, 2007:



|                  |  |                                                         |  |                                                        
|----------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|Name of Executive |  | Benefit Level Under Section 6 of the 2007 CIC
Agreement |  | Benefit Level Under Section 8 of the 2007 CIC Agreement
|Angelo Rago       |  | Two Times                                               |  | Two Times
### EERE-2013-BT-NOC-0023

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING OF THE COMMERCIAL/ INDUSTRIAL PUMPS WORKING GROUP

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW.

Washington, DC 20585

Thursday, January 30, 2014

10 a.m. – 6 p.m. EST, Room GH-019

Agenda

10:00 – 10:05 am Welcome

10:05 – 10:15 am Opening Remarks, Introductions, and Agenda Review

10:15 – 11:15 am Definition of Covered Product

11:15 am – 12:30 pm Scope of the Negotiation

12:30 – 1:30 pm Break for Lunch (on your own)

1:30 – 3:30 pm Scope of the Negotiation, continued

3:30 – 6:00 pm Metric for Pump Efficiency

Friday, January 31, 2014

8 a.m. – 3 p.m. EST, Room 8E-089

Agenda

8:00 - 8:05 am Welcome

8:05 - 8:15 am Opening Remarks

8:15 - 10:15 am Testing Overview

10:15 - 10:30 am Break

10:30 – 11:30 am Test Procedure, continued

11:30 am – 12:30 pm Data Requests

12:30 - 1:30 pm Break for Lunch (on your own)

### EERE-2013-BT-NOC-0023

1:30 - 2:45 pm Agenda setting for next meeting

2:45 - 3:00 pm Conclusions and Closing Remarks

3:00 pm Adjourn
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of American Standard Companies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frederic M. Poses, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Frederic M. Poses  
|Frederic M. Poses      
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|February 24, 2006
No. 09-9403.

#### James Lynn Nichols, Petitioner v. Georgia.

559 U.S. 1110, 130 S. Ct. 2411,

176 L. Ed. 2d 930,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3702,

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.

Same case below, 285 Ga. 784, 683 S.E.2d 610.
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 (HR&A LOGO) 
 Hamilton, Rabinovitz & Alschuler, Inc. Policy, Financial & Management Consultants
 CONSENT OF HAMILTON, RABINOVITZ & ALSCHULER, INC. Hamilton, Rabinovitz & Alschuler (HR&A) consents to being named in American Standard
Companies Inc.s Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004 in the form
and context in which HR&A is named and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 pertaining to the 2002 Omnibus Incentive Plan and Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (Registration No. 333-96547), Form S-3 pertaining to the registration of $1.0
billion of debt securities (Registration No. 333-67943), Form S-8 pertaining to the Employee
Stock Purchase Plan (Registration No. 333-40575), Form S-8 pertaining to the Deferred
Compensation Plan (Registration No. 333-75492), Form S-8 pertaining to the Supplemental
Compensation Plan for Outside Directors (Registration No. 333-109562) and Form S-8 pertaining
to the Stock Incentive Plan (Registration Nos. 333-65252 and 033-63007). HR&A does not
authorize or cause the filing of such Annual Report and does not make or purport to make any
statement other than as reflected in the Annual Report. (-s- Francine F. Rabinovitz) /s/ Francine F. Rabinovitz   February 1, 2005
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA



### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

EVAN M. STUMP

,

Appellant

,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee.

No. 2D 20 2 4

- 0 525

May 22 , 2024

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.1 41(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for

Manatee County; Lon Arend , Judge

.

Evan M. Stump, pro se.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and LABRIT

, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
STATE of North Carolina v. Joseph GILL

No. 416P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Thomas F. Loflin, III, Attorney at Law, Durham, for Gill, Joseph.

Zachary Padget, Assistant Attorney General, Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of November 2018 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 21st of November 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 4th of December 2018 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*421"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2019."
AFS-12-007-E 

October 28, 2011 

 

 Exemption No. 10177B 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0970 

Mr. Omer ErSelcuk 

President/Chief Executive Officer 

Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines 

1210 Watergut 

Christianstead, VI 00820 

Dear Mr. ErSelcuk: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 10177, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated October 3, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines (Seaborne Airlines) for an 

extension of Exemption No. 10177, as amended, to June 30, 2012. That exemption from 

part 121, appendix K, paragraph 5a of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Seaborne 

Airlines to continue to operate DHC-6-300 float-equipped airplanes after the December 20, 

2010, effective date without meeting certain aircraft performance requirements. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Seaborne Airlines. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10177, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10177, as amended, to June 30, 

2012 unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

David C. Gilliom 

Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5183 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5183

  To amend title II of the Social Security Act to exclude benefits of 
   adopted disabled adult children from determinations of the family 
                                maximum.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2006

Mr. Kuhl of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title II of the Social Security Act to exclude benefits of 
   adopted disabled adult children from determinations of the family 
                                maximum.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security for Adopted Disabled 
Adult Children Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF BENEFITS OF ADOPTED DISABLED ADULT CHILDREN IN 
              DETERMINATIONS OF THE FAMILY MAXIMUM.

    (a) In General.--Section 203(a)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 403(a)(3)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
    ``(E) When any of such individuals who is an adopted child of the 
insured individual is entitled for any month to monthly benefits as a 
child described in section 202(d)(1)(G), the benefit to which such 
child is entitled on the basis of the wages and self-employment income 
of such insured individual for such month shall be determined without 
regard to this subsection, and the benefits of all other individuals 
who are entitled for such month to monthly benefits under section 202 
based on the wages and self-employment income of such insured 
individual shall be determined as if no such child were entitled to 
such benefits for such month.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to benefits for months ending after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 WRITTEN STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 The undersigned, James V. Mazzo and Richard A. Meier, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Advanced Medical
Optics, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certify to the best of their knowledge that: (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarterly period ended September 24, 2004 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. Dated: October 29, 2004 /s/ JAMES V. MAZZO
James V. Mazzo,
President and Chief Executive
Officer/s/ RICHARD A. MEIER
Richard A. Meier,
Executive Vice President of
Operations and Finance, and Chief
Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. and will be retained by Advanced
Medical Optics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23
- 10787 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Salvador Antonio Martinez,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:21
- CR
- 112 - 13

**__________ ____________________**  Before **Wiener, Haynes**  **,** and **Douglas,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Salvador Antonio Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 13, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-10787 Document: 73-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/13/2024No. 23
- 10787

2 concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further re sponsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 23-10787 Document: 73-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/13/2024
No. 09-10216.

#### Deepak Jahagirdar, Petitioner v. United States.

560 U.S. 902, 130 S. Ct. 3313,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1181,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3934.

May 17, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until June 7, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 21, 2024

No. 04

- 24

- 00017

- CR

Manuel ESPINOZA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2023CR5174

Honorable Andrew Carruthers , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, this appeal is

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on February 21, 2024

.

_____________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of February, 2024

.

_____________________________ Tommy Stolhandske , Clerk of Court