alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5182]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,871]


Mars Petcare US, Inc., Vernon, CA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on January 13, 2009 in response to a worker 
petition filed by a State Workforce office on behalf of workers of Mars 
Petcare US, Inc., Vernon, California.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of March 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-5182 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  1)
    
    such Quarter Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months
ended September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    the information contained in such Quarter Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the three months ended September 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Plumas
Bancorp.
 Date:  November 9, 2005
    /s/ Andrew RybackAndrew J. Ryback, Chief Financial Officer
IN RE: J.H, Z.R., A.R., and D.R.

172A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 8, 2019

Sydney J. Batch, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

Theresa Boucher, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem.

Brandon Duckworth, Attorney Advocate /GAL.

*483The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of July 2019 by Respondent-Mother to Amend the Record on Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of July 2019."
|   | 1. | The                amount of the loan: Six Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars                ($6,500,000); |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                term of the loan agreement: from January 21, 2008 to June 30,                2008; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | The                type of the loan: short-term loan; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4. | The                loan shall be without interest; |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------|

|   | 5. | The                Borrower guarantees to repay the principal of the loan by June 30,                2008,                and the terms of the loan agreement shall not be breached. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 6. | With                approval from the Lender the Borrower can pay off the loan before                June 30,                2007. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| The                Lender:                                      |                          | The                Borrower:                                  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| Tianshi                International Investment Group Co., Ltd. |                          | Tianjin                Tiens Life Resources Co., Ltd.Co., Ltd |
|                                                            |                          |                                                          |   |   |
| By                                                              | /s/                Jinyuan Li |                                                          | By | /s/                Yiqun Wu |
|                                                            |                          |                                                          |   |   |
| Title:                                                          | President                     |                                                          |   | Title:                    Legal Representative |
|                                                            |                          |                                                          |   |   |
| January                21, 2008                                 |                          |                                                          | January                21, 2008 |

----
No. 09-9826.

#### Shawntrail J. Lee, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1100, 130 S. Ct. 2392,

176 L. Ed. 2d 782,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3640.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 586 F.3d 859.
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Christopher R. Ebersole, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report (the Report) on Form 10-QSB of the small business issuer;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;  4.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:2/14/08By:/s/Christopher R. EbersoleChristopher R. EbersoleCFO
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r 

### 137008 Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137008 COA: 284883 Wayne CC: 02-013452 KAREM G. MESI, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 11, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d1117 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2008

Clerk
Desiree BLOCK v. Matthew BLOCK

No. 389P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Mark Spencer Williams, Attorney at Law, Christine M. Sprow, Attorney at Law, Wilmington, Richard Forrest Kern, Attorney at Law, for Block, Desiree.

R. Michael Schmidt, III, Attorney at Law, for Block, Matthew.

*418***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th of November 2018 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
EXHIBIT
10.2





Agreement
on Debt Transfer and Offset





Party A: Tianyuan Capital
Development Co., Ltd.




Party B: Tianshi International
Holdings Group Co., Ltd.




Party C: Tianjin Tianshi
Biological Engineering Co., Ltd.





Party A,
Party B and Party C enter into this Agreement on June 30, 2009, which shall be
observed by all parties of this Agreement.




Whereas,
Party A is a creditor of Party B and Party B is a creditor of Party C. After
consultation, Party A, Party B and Party C agree the provisions as
follows:




1. Party
C pays off the loan payable of USD 1,170,816.62 (principal of USD1, 065,000 and
USD105, 816.62 is the interest) to Party A in place of Party B;




2. Party
B writes off the debt of Party C with the same amount;




3. Party
A, Party B and Party C shall perform this Agreement, including writing proper
receipts on June 30, 2009.




4. This
Agreement is effective as of the date first written above and is signed by three
parties for confirmation.




Party A: Tianyuan Capital
Development Co., Ltd.




Legal
Representative: /s/ Jinyuan Li





Party B: Tianshi
International Holdings Group Co., Ltd.




Legal
Representative: /s/ Jinyuan Li





Party C: Tianjin Tianshi
Biological Engineering Co., Ltd.




Legal
Representative: /s/ Jinyuan Li
**Exhibit 32**

 

**Written Statement of Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

 

The undersigned,the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Regal EntertainmentGroup, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), each hereby certifies that, tohis/her knowledge on the date hereof:

 

(a)                                  the Form 10-Q of the Company for thesecond quarter ended July 2, 2009, filed on the date hereof with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)                                 the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ AMY E. MILES        |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Amy E. Miles            |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | August 11, 2009    |
|   |                    |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/ DAVID H. OWNBY      |
|   | David H. Ownby          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | August 11, 2009    |

 

----
TS-UVCA02

Attachment #7

Pt. 2, Sec. B, 1a

Processing Information on the New Chemical Substance at Industrial Sites Controlled by Others

The new chemical substance is an acrylate monomer identified under the trade name, Medol10. The compound is manufactured by Osak a Organic Chemical Industry, Ltd. (OOC) which is based in Japan. The substance w ill then be imported by Kowa American Corporation (Kowa). Kowa will then sell the subst ance to customers in the U.S. for use as a

reactive intermediate for use in ultraviolet (UV), electron beam (EB), and conventionally cured coating and ink formulations.

The diagram given on the following page provid es a general representation describing the manner in which the formulation and end use processing steps are expected to occur. The diagram identifies the major unit operation steps, chemical conversions, feedstocks, waste streams, storage containers, and cleaning ope rations. The diagram also identifies worker exposure activities ( letters ) and environmental release points [ numbers ] which correspond to those given in the table provided at LVE page 10a.Attachment #7

Processing Information on the New Chemical Substances at Industrial Sites Controlled by Others TS-UVCA02
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division 

                    Notice is hereby given that, on February 10, 2009, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”) Joint Venture to Perform Project Entitled Versatile Onboard Traffic Embedded Roaming Sensors (“VOTERS”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                 

                    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: Northeastern University, Boston, MA; University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA; University of Vermont and State Agricultural College, Burlington, VT; and Witten Technologies, Inc., Somerville, MA. The general area of VOTERS's planned activity is to develop new products from groundbreaking advanced technologies                           ( print page 10968)                        that inspect and monitor infrastructure using sensors.                 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

 [FR Doc. E9-5268 Filed 3-12-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
No. 11-7601.

#### Jose Sanchez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1136, 132 S. Ct. 1064,

181 L. Ed. 2d 780,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 451.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 830.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5095 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5095

 To prohibit deceptive altering or disguising of caller identification 
                      on outbound telephone calls.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2006

 Mr. Engel (for himself and Mrs. Wilson of New Mexico) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit deceptive altering or disguising of caller identification 
                      on outbound telephone calls.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TELEPHONE CALLER IDENTIFICATION FRAUD PROHIBITED.

    (a) Conduct Prohibited.--Not later than 270 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Federal Trade Commission shall 
promulgate a rule under section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade 
Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)(1)(B)) to prohibit, as an unfair or 
deceptive act or practice, making any outbound telephone call that 
alters, masks, or disguises, or employing any technology to alter, 
mask, or disguise, the automatic number identification of the caller, 
with the intent to deceive the person to whom the call is made.
    (b) Definitions.--For purposes of the rule required by this Act--
            (1) the term ``automatic number identification'' means the 
        10 digit telephone number used by a telecommunications carrier 
        to determine the telephone number of the calling party on any 
        outbound telephone call, such as is used to provide telephone 
        customers with caller identification services; and
            (2) the term ``telecommunications carrier'' has the meaning 
        given such term in section 3(44) of the Communications Act of 
        1934 (47 U.S.C. 153(44)).
                                 <all>
```
No. 09-8425.

#### Wayne Moore, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 956, 130 S. Ct. 1551,

176 L. Ed. 2d 141,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1211.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 569 F.3d 341.
EXHIBIT 32.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Peter M Kuhn, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Bullion River Gold Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Bullion River Gold Corp.



Date: April 14, 2005
                                     By:  /s/ Peter M. Kuhn
                                          -------------------------------------
                                     Name:    Peter M. Kuhn
                                     Title:   Chief Executive Officer

I, Daniel Graves, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Bullion River Gold Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Bullion River Gold Corp.



Date: April 14, 2005
                                     By:  /s/ Daniel Graves
                                          -------------------------------------
                                     Name:    Daniel Graves
                                     Title:   Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Bullion River Gold Corp. and will be retained by Bullion River Gold
Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
No. 09-8711.

#### Derek Anthony Damiano, Petitioner v. California.

559 U.S. 1015, 130 S. Ct. 1902,

176 L. Ed. 2d 379,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2748.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, denied.
**Exhibit32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of 1stColonial Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Gerard M. Banmiller, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           theReport fully complies with the requirements of section 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Gerard M. Banmiller | ** ** |
|-------------------------|------------|
| Gerard M. Banmiller     |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| November 15, 2004       |

 

----