alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.02

           ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

MBNA AMERICA BANK, N.A.


MBNA MASTER CREDIT CARD TRUST II


         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of MBNA
America Bank, N.A. (the "Bank"), as Servicer pursuant to the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement dated as of August 4, 1994 (the "Pooling and
Servicing Agreement") by and between the Bank and The Bank of New York,
as trustee, (the "Trustee") does hereby certify that:

         1.  The Bank is Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement.

         2.  The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to
the Pooling and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this
Certificate to the Trustee.

         3.  This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.05 of
the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

         4.  A review of the activities of the Servicer during the
twelve month period ended June 30, 1999 was conducted under my
supervision.

         5.  Based on such review, the Servicer has, to my knowledge,
fully performed all its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement throughout such twelve month period except as set forth in
paragraph 6 below.  No material default in the performance of such
obligations has occurred or is continuing.

         6.  On August 1, 1999, financing statement 9410483, relating to
the grant of security for interchange and proceeds for Series 1994-A and
the grant of a security interest to the Master Credit Card Trust II (the
"Master Trust") for the original accounts and receivables, lapsed
without being renewed.  On August 16, 1999, financing statement 9411277,
relating to the grant of security for interchange and proceeds for
Series 1994-B lapsed without being renewed.  This was discovered on
August 27, 1999, during the due diligence process to deliver the annual
Servicer's Certificate as required by the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement.  The lien and grant of security interest was reestablished on
August 30, 1999 with additional filings, securing the accounts and
receivables for the Master Trust.  The Master Trust currently has a
first priority perfected security interest in the accounts and
receivables in the Master Trust and for the interchange and proceeds, as
evidenced by the UCC records.  The Servicer and the Issuer have added
additional review procedures and will engage outside counsel to monitor
the UCC records relating to the Master Trust to prevent any future lapse
of a filing statement for an active series or for the Master Trust.





         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this
Certificate this 30th day of August, 1999.



 						/S/ Christopher A. Halmy
						Name:    Christopher A. Halmy
						Title:      Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 48 (Friday, March 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5270]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Information Card Foundation

    Notice is hereby given that, on February 11, 2009, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Information Card Foundation 
has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its 
membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Scott 
Loftesness (individual member), Palo Alto, CA; Mediportal, Overmere, 
BELGIUM; NorthID, Helsinki, FINLAND; Tascet Identity Network, Madison, 
WI; Acxiom, Broomfield, CO; Craig Burton (individual member), Salt Lake 
City, UT; Kaliya Hamlin (individual member), Berkeley, CA; Alexis Bor 
(individual member), Haymarket, VA; Jem Pagan (individual member), 
York, PA; Bob Lutz (individual member), Scotch Plains, NJ; J. Robert 
Namestka (individual member), Irwin, PA; Patrick Petit (individual 
member), San Martin d'Uriage, FRANCE; and Brian Roosevelt (individual 
member), Marshfield, MA have been added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Information Card Foundation intends 
to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On June 2, 2008, Information Card Foundation filed its original 
notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 
6(b) of the Act on July 16, 2008 (73 FR 40883).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 20, 
2008. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on November 21, 2008 (73 FR 70674).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
 [FR Doc. E9-5270 Filed 3-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
<PAGE>   1


[KPMG  HANADI SUDJENDRO & REKAN LETTERHEAD]
     

      Jakarta, 14 April 1997

      Ref: 101/AH/97

      Arthur Andersen LLP
      33 West Monroe Street
      Chicago, IL 60603
      United States of America



      Dear Sirs,

      As requested, we as independent Public Accountants hereby provide you with
      the consent to file to the Securities & Exchange Commission in United
      States, our report dated February 14, 1996 in connection with the audit
      of PT MBF Buana Multicorpora's financial statements for the year ended
      December 31, 1995.

      We understand that our report will be included in MBF USA Inc's Form 10K
      (Annual Report) for the year of 1995 and 1996.

      
      Yours truly,

        [Signature]
        [Seal]

      KPMG Hanadi Sudjendro & Rekan
      Drs. Achmand Hidayat
      Partner
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6744

ARMANDO DESPAIGNE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PHOEBE JOHNSON, Warden of Perry Correctional Institution; CHARLES CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-3410-13AK-6) Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 27, 1998 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Armando Despaigne, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) petition. Appellant’s case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that reliefbe denied and advised Appellant that failure to file timely objections to the report and recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). Appellant has waived appellate review by failing to file objections afterreceiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### Swanson , Bria n (OST) tXK'-O^ ' 2x>0 0 - ^^"^ 5 From : Kimberl yTic e [kimtice@gmail.com ]

. ri -CHI Tn ^ Sent : Thursday , Januar y19 , 201 2 1:4 9 P M ,. ! L-1'^J^^lL>\' , To : Devany , Denni s (OST) ; EA S (OST ) ; ! l::>:;'^Jj;l[5\ij^ : Subject : Answe rt o Pacifi cWings ' Petitio n fo rReconsideratio n L I LIL I i/\ l l U
T o Who mi t

May Concern , I amwritin g t o oppos e Pacifi c Wings ' petitio n t o reconside r Orde r 2011-11-27 , i n whic h Makan i Kai Ai r

Charter s wa s selecte dt o provid e subsidize dEssentia l Ai r Servic e at Kalaupapa , Hawaii

. I aman employe e residen t a t Kalaupapa , an dI believ e Makan i Kai wa s rightl y awarde dth e EA S subsidy , an dsinc e receivin g th e subsidy , hav e bee n of grea t servic e t o th e Kalaupap acommunity

. Th e reasonabl e fare s provide db y Makan i Kai mak e i t feasibl e t o fly t o Honolul u for doctor' s appointment s an dothe r necessar y chores , whic h wa s a n incredibl e financia l burde n whe n Pacifi c Wing s wa s th e onl y carrie r flyin g ou t

o f th e settlemen t

(an dchargin g roun dtri p fare s o f $500)

. Makan i Kai ha s als o bee n extremel y accomodatin g for th e Hansen' s diseas e patient s i n th e community , an dhav e worke dclosel y withth e communit y t o provid e th e service s w e require

. Thi s wa s not th e cas e whe n Pacifi c Wing s wa s th e onl y airlin e servicin g th e community , whe n man y resident s felt

trappe db y exorbitan t

airfare s an dunaccommodatin g custome r service

. Alon g withMakan i Kai , Pacifi c Wing s was als o abl e t o appl y fo r th e EA S subsidy

. However , throug hthat

exhaustiv e process , an dafter muc h researc h o n th e part o f th e DOT , Makan i Kai wa s chose n ove r al l th e othe r

airlines

. In th e tim e the y hav e bee n operating , the y hav e prove n themselve s mor e tha n worth y o f th e subsid y with thei r excellen t custome r service , resonabl e prices , an dattentio n t o th e need s o f th e community

. I believ e ther e i s n o reaso n t o reconside r th e decisio n t o awar dth e EA S subsid y t o Makan i Kai airlines

. Than k yo u for you r tim e an dconsideration

. Sincerely , Kimberl y A

. Tic e P O Bo x 12 8 Kalaupapa , H I 9674 2 

### :l '> b ^ I

- 2 8
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Todd P. Headley, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sourcefire, Inc. for the quarterended March 31, 2008;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 2, 2008 By:  /s/ Todd P. Headley    Name:  Todd P. Headley    Title:  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 137 (Thursday, July 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41719-41720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-16823]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8797]

Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC) Meeting Notice: Closed 
Meeting

    The Department of State announces a meeting of the U.S. State 
Department--

[[Page 41720]]

Overseas Security Advisory Council on August 19-20, 2014. Pursuant to 
Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. 
Appendix), 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(7)(E), it has been 
determined that the meeting will be closed to the public. The meeting 
will focus on an examination of corporate security policies and 
procedures and will involve extensive discussion of trade secrets and 
proprietary commercial information that is privileged and confidential, 
and will discuss law enforcement investigative techniques and 
procedures. The agenda will include updated committee reports, a 
strategic planning session, and other matters relating to private 
sector security policies and protective programs and the protection of 
U.S. business information overseas.
    For more information, contact Marsha Thurman, Overseas Security 
Advisory Council, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-2008, 
phone: 571-345-2214.

    Dated: July 1, 2014.
Bill A. Miller,
Director of the Diplomatic Security Service, U. S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-16823 Filed 7-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
for the three months ended September 30, 2004, I, Andrew J. Ryback, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

      1)    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three
            months ended September 30, 2004, fully complies with the
            requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934; and

      2)    the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
            the Company for the three months ended September 30, 2004, fairly
            presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
            results of operations of Plumas Bancorp.


Date:  November 10, 2004                 /s/ Andrew Ryback
       -----------------              -----------------------------------
                                      Andrew J. Ryback, Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 245 (Wednesday, December 21, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 79065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32746]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

29 CFR Part 1602

Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements Under Title VII, the ADA 
and GINA

CFR Correction

    In Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 900 to 1899, 
revised as of July 1, 2011, in Part 1602, remove the words ``section 
709(c) of title VII or section 107 of the ADA'' and add in their place 
the words ``section 709(c) of title VII, section 107 of the ADA, or 
section 207(a) of GINA'' wherever they appear in the following 
sections:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Section                              Page No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.   1602.11.............................................          175
Sec.   1602.12.............................................          175
Sec.   1602.19.............................................          177
Sec.   1602.26.............................................          179
Sec.   1602.37.............................................          181
Sec.   1602.45.............................................          184
Sec.   1602.54.............................................          186
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2011-32746 Filed 12-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
WebFilings | EDGAR view


 


EXHIBIT 10.20
 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED CAPACITY RIGHTS AGREEMENT
This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) dated December 16, 2010, amends that certain Amended and Restated Capacity Rights Agreement dated June 24, 2010 and effective as of July 1, 2010 (the “Original Agreement”), by and between JPMorgan LNG Co., a Delaware company (“LNGCo”), and Sabine Pass LNG, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Sabine”).  LNGCo and Sabine are sometimes individually referred to as a “Party” and, collectively, referred to as the “Parties”.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Original Agreement.
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Original Agreement in accordance with the terms of this Amendment; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements, covenants and conditions contained in this Agreement, as well as for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1.    Amendment to Section 1.1
(a)    Section 1.1 of the Original Agreement is hereby amended by deleting “an LNGCo TUA,” where it appears in the definition of “Applicable Law.”
(b)    Section 1.1 of the Original Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the definition of “LNGCo TUA” where it appears therein.
2.    Amendment to Section 3.3
(a)    Section 3.3 of the Original Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
“3.3    Intentionally Deleted” 
3.    Consent.  LNGCo hereby consents to Amendment No. 1 to the Surrender Agreement as attached hereto as Exhibit A.
4.    No Other Changes; Reference.  Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  
5.    Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with the State of New York, without regard to principles of laws (whether of the State of New York or any other jurisdiction).
6.    Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in counterparts and if so executed by each Party hereto, all copies together shall constitute a single agreement.
*********
 
 
 

 


 


 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.
 
SABINE PASS LNG, L.P.
By: Sabine Pass LNG-GP, LLC
       its general partner
 
			
	By:
	 
	/s/ R. Keith Teague

	Name:
	 
	R. Keith Teague

	Title:
	 
	President




  
 
 
 
 
 
JPMORGAN LNG Co.
			
	By:
	 
	/s/  Patrick Strange

	Name:
	 
	Patrick Strange

	Title:
	 
	Vice President




 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Signature Page to Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Capacity Rights Agreement
Exhibit 23


                                          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Sparta Foods, Inc.

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  registration
statement  (No.  333-02465) on Form S-8 and in the  registration  statement (no.
333-04559)  on Form S-3 of Sparta Foods,  Inc. of our report dated  November 22,
1996, relating to the financial  statements of Sparta Foods, Inc. and Subsidiary
as of September  30, 1996 and 1995,  which report  appears in the  September 30,
1996, annual report on Form 10-KSB of Sparta Foods, Inc.



                                           /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 23, 1996
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 12, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41223

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BENJAMIN RODRIGUEZ-JUAREZ, also known as 

Luis Hernandez-Rodriguez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:04-CR-315-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Benjamin Rodriguez-Juarez (Rodriguez) appeals his guiltyplea conviction for unlawful presence in the United States

following deportation. He argues that the “felony” and

“aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2)

are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S.

466 (2000). 
No. 05-41223

-2-

His constitutional challenge is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). 

Although Rodriguez contends that Almendarez-Torres was

incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court

would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi, we have

repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that

Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v.

Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126

S. Ct. 298 (2005). Rodriguez properly concedes that his argument

is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit

precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further

review.

AFFIRMED.