Electric Glass Melt Furnace 

Emissions Test Report 

Prepared for: 

Johns Manville International 

Richmond Plant 

814 Richmond Avenue 

Richmond, Indiana 47374 

Project No. 10-3990.07 

January 20, 2011 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 

2615 Wolcott Street 

Ferndale, Michigan 48220 

(248) 548-8070 
Johns Manville International. BTEC Project No. 10-3990.07 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 20, 2011 

i

Executive Summary

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) 

and its members to a voluntary collection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production1 as well as for 

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing2. To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates 

of the following pollutants from the one exhaust stack associated with the Electric Glass Melt 

Furnace located at the Johns Manville International (Johns Manville) site in Richmond, Indiana: 

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) 

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and 

selenium 

• Mercury 

• Hexavalent chromium 

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride 

Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and 

NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. Table I on the following page summarizes the 

overall results of the emissions test program. 

 

1

 Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD) 

2

 Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN 
Johns Manville International. BTEC Project No. 10-3990.07 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 20, 2011 

ii

Table I 

Electric Glass Melt Furnace Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Test Date(s) Pollutant Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hr) 

Emission Rate

(lbs/ton glass)

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM2.5 < 7.9 x 10-3 < 3.9 x 10-1

Organic Condensible PM2.5 1.9 x 10-2 9.4 x 10-1

Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 1.8 x 10-2 8.9 x 10-1

November 16 & 17, 

2010 

Total PM2.5 < 4.4 x 10-2 < 2.2 x 100

Filterable Particulate < 7.0 x 10-3 < 4.1 x 10-1

Antimony < 3.3 x 10-6 < 1.9 x 10-4

Arsenic < 3.3 x 10-6 < 1.9 x 10-4

Beryllium < 8.4 x 10-7 < 4.8 x 10-5

Cadmium < 9.6 x 10-7 < 5.5 x 10-5

Chromium 7.3 x 10-6 4.4 x 10-4

Cobalt < 4.3 x 10-6 < 2.4 x 10-4

Lead 2.3 x 10-5 1.3 x 10-3

Manganese 3.2 x 10-5 1.6 x 10-3

Nickel 1.8 x 10-5 9.9 x 10-4

November 17 & 18, 

2010 

Selenium 1.8 x 10-5 9.9 x 10-4

November 16, 2010 Mercury 5.3 x 10-5 2.5 x 10-3

November 17 & 18, 

2010 

Hexavalent Chromium < 2.2 x 10-6 < 1.2 x 10-4

Hydrogen Chloride < 2.5 x 10-3 < 1.4 x 10-1 November 16 & 17, 

2010 Hydrogen Fluoride < 2.5 x 10-3 < 1.4 x 10-1

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions. 
Johns Manville International. BTEC Project No. 10-3990.07 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 20, 2011 

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 2

2.1 PROCESS MONITORING ....................................................................................................... 2 

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES.............................................. 2

3.1 EXHAUST GAS VELOCITY, MOLECULAR WEIGHT, AND MOISTURE CONTENT .................... 2 

3.2 PM AND PM2.5 CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................................... 3 

3.3 TOTAL SELECTED METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................ 3 

3.4 HG CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES..................................................................... 4 

3.5 HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................. 4 

3.6 HF AND HCL CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES..................................................... 4 

4.0 TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................................. 5

TABLES

Table 1 – Test Personnel 

Table 2 – Electric Glass Melt Furnace Emissions Test Program Summary 

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram 

Figure 2 – Method 3A Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 3 – OTM 27/OTM 28 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 4 – Method 29 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 5 – Method 30B Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 6 – Method 0061 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 7 – Method 26A Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Detailed Test Run Results 

Appendix B – Process Data 

Appendix C – Field and Computer-Generated Data Sheets and Notes 

Appendix D – Equipment Calibration Documents 

Appendix E – Laboratory Analytical Reports 
Johns Manville International. BTEC Project No. 10-3990.07 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 20, 2011 

1

1.0 Introduction 

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) 

and its members to a voluntary collection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production3 as well as for 

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing4. To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates 

of the following pollutants from the one exhaust stack associated with the Electric Glass Melt 

Furnace located at the Johns Manville International (Johns Manville) site in Richmond, Indiana: 

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) 

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and 

selenium 

• Mercury 

• Hexavalent chromium 

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride 

Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and 

NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. The emissions test program was conducted on 

November 16, 17, and 18, 2010. The test program consisted of triplicate emission tests at each 

location for each parameter. The field sampling portion of the emissions test program included 

the personnel summarized by Table 1. 

Table 1 

Emissions Test Program Personnel

Personnel Affiliation 

Jim Sharp BTEC 

Paul Molenda BTEC 

Matthew Young BTEC 

Dan Stevens Johns Manville 

 

3

 Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD) 

4

 Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN 
Johns Manville International. BTEC Project No. 10-3990.07 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 20, 2011 

2

2.0 Process Description

Glass raw materials and cullet are fed to the electric melter. Molten glass then flows to the 

fiberizers where fiberglass is made. The material is collected, shredded, and packaged for sale. 

2.1 Process Monitoring 

During the emissions test program, the electric melt furnaces were operated under normal 

conditions. In addition to production rate during each test run, process operating data recorded 

during the emissions test program included (1) furnace temperature, (2) raw material feed rates, 

and (3) baghouse pressure drop. Process production data is available in Appendix B. Control 

equipment data will be available to U.S. EPA on request. 

3.0 Sampling and Analytical Methodologies 

Sampling and analytical methodologies for the emissions test program can be separated into six 

categories as follows: 

(1) Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weight, and moisture content; 

(2) Measurement of exhaust gas PM and PM2.5 concentrations and emission rates; 

(3) Measurement of exhaust gas total selected metals concentrations and emission rates; 

(4) Measurement of exhaust gas Hg concentrations and emission rates; 

(5) Measurement of exhaust gas hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates; 

and, 

(6) Measurement of exhaust gas HF and HCl concentrations and emission rates. 

Descriptions of sampling and analytical methodologies by category are summarized by Sections 

3.1 through 3.6, respectively. 

3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity, Molecular Weight, and Moisture Content 

Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weight, and moisture content was conducted 

using the following reference test methods codified at Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code 

of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 60, Appendix A): 

• Method 1 - “Location of the Sampling Site and Sampling Points” 

• Method 2 - “Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flowrate” 

• Method 3A - “Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in 

Emissions from Stationary Sources”(Instrumental Analyzer Procedure)

• Method 4 - “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases”

These test methods were used to evaluate exhaust gas flowrates either in conjunction with the 

isokinetic sampling methodologies used to evaluate some pollutant emission rates or as separate, 

discrete measurements conducted in support of the non-isokinetic sampling methodologies. 
Johns Manville International. BTEC Project No. 10-3990.07 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 20, 2011 

3

Stack gas velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in 

Method 1 and Method 2 (see Figure 1 for a traverse location drawing). An S-type pitot tube with 

a thermocouple assembly, calibrated in accordance with Method 2, Section 4.1.1, was used to 

measure exhaust gas velocity pressures (using a manometer) and temperatures at each location 

during testing. The S-type pitot tube dimensions were within specified limits, therefore, a 

baseline pitot tube coefficient of 0.84 (dimensionless) were assigned. 

Molecular weight was determined according to USEPA Method 3A. The O2 content of the 

exhaust gas was measured using a M&C Products PMA 100-L O2 gas analyzer (or equivalent) 

and the CO2 content of the exhaust gas was measured using a California Analytical Instruments 

(CAI0 600 Series CO2 gas analyzer (or equivalent). An integrated sample of the gas stream was 

drawn through an insulated stainless-steel probe with an in-line glass fiber filter to remove any 

particulate and into a tedlar sample bag utilizing an evacuated sample lung. At the completion of 

each test the gas sample was introduced to the analyzers. Data was recorded at 4-second 

intervals on a PC equipped with data acquisition software. A schematic drawing of the emission 

monitoring system is provided as Figure 2. 

Exhaust gas moisture content was evaluated using Method 4. Exhaust gas moisture content was 

be determined volumetrically (liquid impingers) and gravimetrically (silica gel impinger). 

3.2 PM and PM2.5 Concentrations and Emission Rates 

PM/PM2.5 concentrations and emission rates were measured using U.S. EPA Other Test 

Methods (OTM) 27 and OTM 28. PM, PM2.5, and CPM concentrations and emission rates were 

measured using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This 

system consisted of (1) a tapered nozzle, (2) a PM10 particle sizer cyclone followed by a PM2.5

particle sizer cyclone, (3) a glass or quartz fiber filter assembly and heated probe, (4) a glass 

recirculating ice water condenser system, (5) a set of four GS impingers, (6) a length of sample 

line, and (7) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated 

orifice. Prior to each test, the second and third impingers were filled with 100 ml of HPLC 

water, the first and fourth impingers were empty, and the fifth impinger contained 

approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the PM2.5/CPM sample 

train is provided as Figure 3. The total filterable PM fraction was collected on the front half of 

the M29 Metals sampling train as per the QAPP. 

3.3 Total Selected Metals Concentrations and Emission Rates

Total selected metals concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 

40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 29. Selected metals concentrations and emission rates were 

measured using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This 

system consisted of (1) a borosilicate glass or quartz nozzle, (2) a steel probe w/glass liner, (3) a 

heated quartz fiber filter assembly, (4) a set of six GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line, 

and (6) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. 

Prior to each test, the first two impingers were filled with 100 ml of a 5% nitric acid 

(HNO3)/10% hydrogen peroxide solution, the third impinger was empty, and the fourth 
Johns Manville International. BTEC Project No. 10-3990.07 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 20, 2011 

4

contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the metals 

sampling train is provided as Figure 4. 

3.4 Hg Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Hg concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, 

Appendix A, Method 30B and using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack 

sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a sorbent trap, (2) a steel probe, (3) Teflon 

tubing, (4) three GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line, and (6) a Nutech® control case 

equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. The first impinger was left empty 

as a water knockout, and the remaining two impingers contained approximately 300 g of silica 

gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Hg sampling train is provided as Figure 5. 

3.5 Hexavalent Chromium Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 

Method 0061 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM-98.01. Hexavalent chromium concentrations and 

emission rates were measured using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack 

sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a glass nozzle, (2) a heated steel probe with a 

glass probe liner, (4) a Teflon tee with a recirculating pump, (5) five GS impingers, (6) a length 

of sample line, and (7) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and a 

calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first impinger was filled with 150 mL of 0.1N KOH, the 

next two were filled with 75 mL of 0.1 N KOH, the fourth was empty, and the last impinger 

contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Method 0061 

sampling train is provided as Figure 6. 

3.6 HF and HCl Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Measurement of hydrogen halide concentrations and emission rates were conducted using the 

procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 26A. The Method 26A sampling train consisted 

of: (1) a heated borosilicate or quartz probe liner; (2) a heated borosilicate or quartz glass filter 

holder containing a pre-weighed 110-mm diameter washed quartz filter with Teflon filter 

support; (3) a set of three Greensburg-Smith (GS) impingers each containing 100 ml of 0.1 

Normal Sulfuric Acid (0.1 N H2SO4), (4) a modified GS impinger containing a known weight of 

silica gel desiccant; (5) a length of sample line, and (7) a Nutech control case equipped with a 

pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Figure 7 provides an illustration of the Method 26A 

sample train. 
Johns Manville International. BTEC Project No. 10-3990.07 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 20, 2011 

5

4.0 Test Results 

The overall results of the emissions test program are summarized by Table 2. 

Table 2 

Electric Glass Melt Furnace Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Test Date(s) Pollutant Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hr) 

Emission Rate

(lbs/ton glass)

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM2.5 < 7.9 x 10-3 < 3.9 x 10-1

Organic Condensible PM2.5 1.9 x 10-2 9.4 x 10-1

Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 1.8 x 10-2 8.9 x 10-1

November 16 & 17, 

2010 

Total PM2.5 < 4.4 x 10-2 < 2.2 x 100

Filterable Particulate < 7.0 x 10-3 < 4.1 x 10-1

Antimony < 3.3 x 10-6 < 1.9 x 10-4

Arsenic < 3.3 x 10-6 < 1.9 x 10-4

Beryllium < 8.4 x 10-7 < 4.8 x 10-5

Cadmium < 9.6 x 10-7 < 5.5 x 10-5

Chromium 7.3 x 10-6 4.4 x 10-4

Cobalt < 4.3 x 10-6 < 2.4 x 10-4

Lead 2.3 x 10-5 1.3 x 10-3

Manganese 3.2 x 10-5 1.6 x 10-3

Nickel 1.8 x 10-5 9.9 x 10-4

November 17 & 18, 

2010 

Selenium 1.8 x 10-5 9.9 x 10-4

November 16, 2010 Mercury 5.3 x 10-5 2.5 x 10-3

November 17 & 18, 

2010 

Hexavalent Chromium < 2.2 x 10-6 < 1.2 x 10-4

Hydrogen Chloride < 2.5 x 10-3 < 1.4 x 10-1 November 16 & 17, 

2010 Hydrogen Fluoride < 2.5 x 10-3 < 1.4 x 10-1

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions. 

Detailed results for individual emission test runs are summarized in Appendix A. Process data 

associated with the emissions test program is provided in Appendix B. Field and computergenerated data sheets are included in Appendix C. Appendix D includes calibration documents 

and Appendix E includes laboratory analytical reports. 
Johns Manville International. BTEC Project No. 10-3990.07 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 20, 2011 

6

Limitations

The information and opinions rendered in this report are exclusively for use by NAIMA and/or 

Johns Manville International. BTEC will not distribute or publish this report without NAIMA’s 

consent except as required by law or court order. BTEC accepts responsibility for the competent 

performance of its duties in executing the assignment and preparing reports in accordance with 

the normal standards of the profession, but disclaims any responsibility for consequential 

damages. 

This report was prepared by: 

Brandon V. Chase 

Staff Environmental Engineer 

This report was reviewed by: 

Randal J. Tysar 

Senior Environmental Engineer 
Figures 
diameter = 24"

Points Distance "

12 0.5

11 1.6

10 2.8

9 4.2

8 6.0

7 8.5

6 15.5

5 18.0

4 19.8

3 21.2

2 22.4

1 23.5

Figure 1

Site:

Johns Manville

Richmond, Indiana

Electric Melt Furnace

BT Environmental Consulting, 

Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Not to Scale

<0.5 diameters

 <2 diameters
Bags Samples

to analyzers

Figure 2

Site:

USEPA Method 3A

Johns Manville

Richmond, Indiana

Electric Melt Furnace

BT Environmental Consulting, 

Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Data Acquisition System

Calibration Gases 

(Fed to Probe Tip)

Environics Gas 

Dilution System

M&C Model 100-L

O2 Analyzer

CAI Series 600

CO2 Analyzer

pump

tedlar 

bag
Figure 3

Site:USEPA OTM27/28Johns ManvilleRichmond, IndianaElectric Melt Furnace

BT Environmental Consult

2615 Wolcott Michigan

Silica gel

Heated Filter Box

S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple

Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off

-

+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

45mm Filter Housing

Verticle Condenser Filter Holder W/ Tef

Pot Belly Impinger 100 mL DI H2O
Figure 4

Site:USEPA Method 29Johns ManvilleRichmond, IndianaElectric Melt Furnace

BT Environmental Consult

2615 Wolcott Michigan 48220

Silica gel

100 mL 5% HNO3 / 10% H2O2 solution 

Heated Filter Box

S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple

Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off

-

+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5
Figure 5

Site:USEPA Method 30B Sampling TrainJohns ManvilleRichmond, IndianaElectric Melt Furnace

BT Environmental Cons2615 Wolcott Ferndale, Michigan 482

Knock out

Temperature sensor

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off

-

+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

Sample Line

MercuryT rap

Probe
Figure 6

Site:USEPA Method 0061Johns ManvilleRichmond, IndianaElectric Melt Furnace

BT Environmental Cons2615 WolcottFerndale, Michigan

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off

-

+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

150 mL 0.1 N KOH Empty Silica Gel

Perastaltic pump

Teflon tee

75 mL 0.1 N KOH
Empty

Figure 7

Site:USEPA Method 26A Sampling TrainJohns ManvilleRichmond, IndianaElectric Melt Furnace

BT Environmental Cons2615 Wolcott Michigan

Heated Filter Box

S-type pitot w/ thermocouple

Heated probe with glass liner

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off

-

+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

Empty 100 mL 0.1N H2SO4 
APPENDIX A 

DETAILED TEST RUN RESULTS 
Plant Job #

Location OTM27/OTM 28 Testing

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 11/16/2010 11/16/2010 11/17/2010

Start Run Start Time 7:21:00 11:55:00 7:43:00

Run Finish Time 14:20:00 16:06:00 11:21:00

Net Traversing Points 12 12 12

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 240.96 237.81 212.84 231

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.003 1.003 1.003 1.003

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.80 29.80 29.90 29.83

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 0.44 0.43 0.40 0.43

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 89.980 87.820 73.270 83.690

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 66.96 73.25 67.00 69.07

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 90.163 86.960 73.653 83.592

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 92.0 144 168.0 134.7

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 4.33 6.78 7.91 6.34

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 4.6 7.2 9.7 7.2

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.954 0.928 0.903 0.928

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.6

%O2 Oxygen, % 19.9 20 20.3 20.1

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.3 79.4 79.3 79.3

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.92 28.90 28.88 28.90

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.42 28.11 27.82 28.12

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.3 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.78 29.78 29.88 29.81

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 199 189 185 191

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.395 0.385 0.308 0.363

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 39.8 39.2 35.1 38.0

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 5,549 5,708 4,881 5,380

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 7,385 7,498 6,615 7,166

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 94.5 94.9 102.2 97.2

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W Filterable PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 1.2 0.8 0.8 0.9

Cmg/dscm Filterable PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 4.6E-01 3.2E-01 3.8E-01 3.9E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Filterable PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Filterable PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 9.9E-03 6.8E-03 7.0E-03 7.9E-03

Elb/ton product Filterable PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Organic Condensible PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 1.8 1.9 2.8 2.2

Cmg/dscm Organic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 7.0E-01 7.7E-01 1.3E+00 9.4E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Organic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Organic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.5E-02 1.6E-02 2.5E-02 1.9E-02

Elb/ton product Organic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 1.9 2.4 2.0 2.1

Cmg/dscm Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 7.4E-01 9.7E-01 9.6E-01 8.9E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.6E-02 2.0E-02 1.8E-02 1.8E-02

Elb/ton product Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Total PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 4.9 5.1 5.6 5.2

Cmg/dscm Total PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 1.9E+00 2.1E+00 2.7E+00 2.2E+00

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Total PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Total PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.1E-02 4.3E-02 4.9E-02 4.4E-02

Elb/ton product Total PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Johns Manville 10-3990.07

Richmond, IN

Source EMF

Personnel MY
Plant Job #

Location Method 29 Metals

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 11/17/2010 11/18/2010 11/18/2010

Start Run Start Time 11:58:00 7:23:00 10:58:00

Run Finish Time 15:15:00 10:39:00 14:14:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 192 192 192 192

DN Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.310 0.310 0.310 0.310

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.003 1.003 1.003 1.003

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.02 30.20 30.20 30.14

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.55 2.54 1.75 1.95

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 133.430 170.170 142.520 148.707

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 81.43 74.04 83.30 79.59

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 131.444 171.380 140.821 147.882

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 225 225 215 221.7

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 10.59 10.59 10.12 10.43

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 7.5 5.8 6.7 6.7

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.925 0.942 0.933 0.933

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.4 0.8 0.1 0.4

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.3 19.9 20.5 20.2

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.3 79.3 79.4 79.3

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.88 28.92 28.84 28.88

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.07 28.29 28.11 28.15

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.3 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.00 30.18 30.18 30.12

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 185 183 185 184

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.212 0.357 0.240 0.270

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 28.8 37.2 30.6 32.2

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 5,465 4,122 4,444 4,677

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 7,007 5,424 5,765 6,065

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 99.7 98.1 99.0 98.9

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W Particulate Method 5 Catch Weight, mg 1.9 1.2 1.9 1.7

Cmg/dscm Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm 5.1E-01 2.5E-01 4.8E-01 4.1E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/hr 7.9E-03 5.1E-03 7.9E-03 7.0E-03

Elb/ton product Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Antimony Catch Weight, μg 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8

Cmg/dscm Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm 2.1E-04 1.6E-04 2.0E-04 1.9E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.3E-06 3.4E-06 3.3E-06 3.3E-06

Elb/ton product Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Arsenic Catch Weight, μg 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8

Cmg/dscm Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm 2.1E-04 1.6E-04 2.0E-04 1.9E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.3E-06 3.4E-06 3.3E-06 3.3E-06

Elb/ton product Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Beryllium Catch Weight, μg 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

Cmg/dscm Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm 5.4E-05 4.1E-05 5.0E-05 4.8E-05

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 8.3E-07 8.4E-07 8.3E-07 8.4E-07

Elb/ton product Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cadmium Catch Weight, μg 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2

Cmg/dscm Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm 5.4E-05 6.0E-05 5.0E-05 5.5E-05

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 8.3E-07 1.2E-06 8.3E-07 9.6E-07

Elb/ton product Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Chromium Catch Weight, μg 2.9 1.5 0.9 1.8

Cmg/dscm Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 7.7E-04 3.1E-04 2.2E-04 4.4E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.2E-05 6.4E-06 3.7E-06 7.3E-06

Elb/ton product Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cobalt Catch Weight, μg 1.1 1.8 0.2 1.0

Cmg/dscm Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm 2.8E-04 3.7E-04 5.0E-05 2.4E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.4E-06 7.6E-06 8.3E-07 4.3E-06

Elb/ton product Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Lead Catch Weight, μg 5.6 10.4 0.6 5.5

Cmg/dscm Lead Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E-03 2.1E-03 1.4E-04 1.3E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Lead Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Lead Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.3E-05 4.4E-05 2.3E-06 2.3E-05

Elb/ton product Lead Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Manganese Catch Weight, μg 3.1 17.9 1.5 7.5

Cmg/dscm Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm 8.3E-04 3.7E-03 3.8E-04 1.6E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.3E-05 7.5E-05 6.3E-06 3.2E-05

Elb/ton product Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Nickel Catch Weight, μg 4.1 6.2 2.3 4.2

Cmg/dscm Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm 1.1E-03 1.3E-03 5.8E-04 9.9E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.7E-05 2.6E-05 9.6E-06 1.8E-05

Elb/ton product Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Selenium Catch Weight, μg 2.2 5.4 5.0 4.2

Cmg/dscm Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm 5.9E-04 1.1E-03 1.3E-03 9.9E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 9.1E-06 2.3E-05 2.1E-05 1.8E-05

Elb/ton product Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

JM 10-3990.07

Richmond

Source EMF

Personnel PM
M30B Mercury Testing

Company Name Plant Location City Plant Location State Source Name Source IDJohns Maville Richmond Indiana Electric Glass Melt Furnace S166 Please note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "S"

Measured Value 

(mg/dscm)

Corrected 

Concentration 

(mg/dscm at 7% O2)

Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used (EPA Method 30B) Data 

B

1 11/16/2010 7:32 11/16/2010 9:32 2.47E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B ADL 2 11/16/2010 9:44 11/16/2010 11:44 2.55E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B ADL 3 11/16/2010 14:00 11/16/2010 16:00 2.51E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B ADL 

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date Test End Time

Total Vapor Phase Mercury 

Page 1 of 3 
M30B Mercury Testing

 QA/QC Documentation

Process 

Production Rate

(tons glass/hr)

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/ton)

Trap ID Section 1 Mass (ng) Section 2 Mass (ng) Total Mass (ng) Initial Spike (ng) Total Non- Spike (ng) Sample Volume (dscm) Volum

Differenc

4.6 0.8 19.9 7498 5708 199

Stack information is from OTM 27/28 Run 1 R1, A 379 0.59 379.59 0 379.59 0.15 

4.6 0.8 19.9 7498 5708 199

Stack information is from OTM 27/28 Run 1 R2, A 381 0 381 0 381 0.15 

7.2 0.6 20 7385 5549 189

Stack information is from OTM 27/28 Run 2 R3, A 372 0.82 372.82 0 372.82 0.15 

Flue Gas 

Temperature (F) Other Supporting Information

Flue Gas 

Moisture 

(%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Flue Gas Flow 

Rate (dscfm)

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(acfm)

Trap #1

Page 2 of 3 
M30B Mercury Testing

Concentration 

(μg/dscm) Trap ID Section 1 Mass Section 2 Mass Total Mass Initial Spike Total Non- Spike Sample Volume Volume Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough Limit Concentration (μg/dscm) Abs. diff. RD (%) Limit C

2.47

R1, B 403.0 0.83 403.83 20 383.83 0.15 0% 0.2

2.5

0.0 0 

2.55

R2, B 406.0 1.10 407.10 20 387.1 0.15 0% 0.3

2.6

0.0 1 

2.51

R3, B 399.0 0.65 399.65 20 379.65 0.15 0% 0.2

2.5

0.0 1 

Trap #2 Paired Trap Agreement (RD) 

≤20% of field 

recovery test

≤ 10% of Section 

1 Hg mass for Hg 

conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or ≤ 

20% of Section 1 

for Hg conc.≤1 

μg/dscm

≥10 % RD mass 

for Hg conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or 

≤20% RD or ≤0.2 

μg/dscm abs.diff. 

for Hg conc. ≤1 

μg/dscm

Page 3 of 3 
Plant Job #

Location Hex Chrome Testing

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 11/17/2010 11/18/2010 11/18/2010

Start Run Start Time 11:58:00 7:23:00 10:58:00

Run Finish Time 15:15:00 10:39:00 14:14:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 192 192 192 192

DN Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.310 0.310 0.310 0.310

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.994 0.994 0.994 0.994

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.02 30.20 30.20 30.14

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.73 2.43 1.89 2.02

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 146.080 173.140 153.550 157.590

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 74.56 70.19 79.23 74.66

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 144.508 174.020 151.543 156.691

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 260 226 237 241.0

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 12.24 10.64 11.16 11.34

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 7.8 5.8 6.9 6.8

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.922 0.942 0.931 0.932

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.4 0.8 0.1 0.4

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.3 19.9 20.5 20.2

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.3 79.3 79.4 79.3

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.88 28.92 28.84 28.88

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.03 28.29 28.09 28.14

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.3 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.00 30.18 30.18 30.12

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 185 184 184 184

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.256 0.368 0.277 0.300

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 31.8 37.8 32.8 34.1

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 5,550 4,528 4,763 4,947

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 7,122 5,985 6,185 6,431

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 99.7 98.0 99.4 99.1

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W Hexavalent Chromium Catch Weight, μg 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.5

Cmg/dscm Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 2.0E-04 8.1E-05 9.3E-05 1.2E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.3E-06 1.7E-06 1.7E-06 2.2E-06

Elb/ton product Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

JM 10-3990.07

Richmond

Source EMF

Personnel MY
Plant Job #

Location HCl and HF Testing

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 11/16/2010 11/17/2010 11/17/2010

Start Run Start Time 15:36:00 7:02:00 8:35:00

Run Finish Time 17:43:00 8:15:00 10:06:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 64 64 64 64

DN Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.310 0.310 0.310 0.310

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.994 0.994 0.994 0.994

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.80 29.90 29.90 29.87

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.65 1.96 1.95 1.85

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 46.570 51.120 51.500 49.730

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 58.81 56.31 68.38 61.17

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 47.112 52.180 51.365 50.219

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 85 82 75 80.7

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 4.00 3.86 3.53 3.80

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 7.8 6.9 6.4 7.0

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.922 0.931 0.936 0.930

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.5

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.0 20.3 20.3 20.2

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.4 79.3 79.3 79.3

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.90 28.88 28.88 28.88

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.04 28.13 28.18 28.12

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.27 -0.27 -0.27 -0.27

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.78 29.88 29.88 29.85

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 185 185 184 185

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.248 0.303 0.292 0.281

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 31.2 34.5 33.9 33.2

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 4,951 4,414 4,896 4,754

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 6,508 5,877 6,390 6,258

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.0 98.8 98.3 99.0

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W HCl Catch Weight, μg 200 200 200 200

Cmg/dscm HCl Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E-01 1.4E-01 1.4E-01 1.4E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 HCl Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr HCl Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.5E-03 2.5E-03 2.5E-03 2.5E-03

Elb/ton product HCl Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W HF Catch Weight, μg 200 200 200 200

Cmg/dscm HF Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E-01 1.4E-01 1.4E-01 1.4E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 HF Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr HF Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.5E-03 2.5E-03 2.5E-03 2.5E-03

Elb/ton product HF Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

JM 10-3990.07

Richmond

Source EMF

Personnel PM
APPENDIX B 

PROCESS DATA 
APPENDIX C 

FIELD AND COMPUTER-GENERATED DATA 

SHEETS 
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # 3ft ptc Pollutant HCL Points/Port 8 Start Finish Pre P

Company JM DGM # MB4 Method 26A Total Points 16 .001@15" .00

Location Richmond Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 4.0

Source EMF Delta ∆H@ 1.71 Date 16-Nov-10 Time/reading 4.0

Operator PM Bws (%) 7.83 # of Ports 2 Total Run 64.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume 73 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.78

Barometric 29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain 12 DGM Y 0.994 Pm (in Hg) 29.80 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.27 Actual Dn (in) 0.31 O2 (%) 20 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2) 0.00052 CO2 (%) 0.6 Md 28.90 Stack Area (sf) 3.14

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.04 Act. Flow (cfm) 5,877 Must delete extra z

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 48.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 4,789Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 4,414Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

8 0.0 4.0 15:36 52.82 0.36 182 59 59 2.38 2.47 2

7 4.0 8.0 15:40 56.38 0.36 182 58 60 2.38 2.47 2

6 8.0 12.0 15:48 60.16 0.34 181 61 60 2.25 2.34 2

5 12.0 16.0 16:43 63.46 0.21 187 58 57 1.39 1.39 24 16.0 20.0 16:47 66.29 0.20 186 56 56 1.32 1.32 23 20.0 24.0 16:51 69.08 0.25 186 57 56 1.65 1.65 22 24.0 28.0 16:55 71.95 0.25 186 58 56 1.65 1.65 2

1 28.0 32.0 17:06 74.75 0.28 186 59 56 1.85 1.84 28 32.0 36.0 17:11 77.84 0.27 186 58 56 1.79 1.78 27 36.0 40.0 17:15 80.93 0.25 186 62 56 1.65 1.64 26 40.0 44.0 17:19 83.82 0.24 187 63 57 1.59 1.58 25 44.0 48.0 17:23 86.65 0.20 188 63 57 1.32 1.32 24 48.0 52.0 17:27 89.29 0.20 188 63 57 1.32 1.32 23 52.0 56.0 17:31 91.91 0.19 188 64 57 1.26 1.25 22 56.0 60.0 17:35 94.38 0.19 180 64 57 1.26 1.25 21 60.0 64.0 17:39 96.95 0.17 180 64 58 1.12 1.12 2

64.0 17:43 99.39

Average: 46.57 0.25 184.9 60.4 57.2 1.64 1.65 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # 3FT PTC Pollutant HCL Points/Port 8 Start Finish Pre P

Company JM DGM # MB4 Method 26A Total Points 16

Location Richmond Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 4.0

Source EMF Delta ∆H@ 1.71 Date 17-Nov-10 Time/reading 4.0

Operator MY Bws (%) 6.9 # of Ports 2 Total Run 64.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume 69 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.88

Barometric 29.90 Silica Gel Weight Gain 13 DGM Y 0.994 Pm (in Hg) 29.90 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.27 Actual Dn (in) 0.31 O2 (%) 20.3 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2) 0.00052 CO2 (%) 0.4 Md 28.88 Stack Area (sf) 3.14

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.13 Act. Flow (cfm) 6,508 Must delete extra z

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 48.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 5,317Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 4,951Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

8 0.0 4.0 7:02 99.59 0.30 184 47 47 2.00 1.94 2

7 4.0 8.0 7:06 102.73 0.31 184 47 47 2.07 2.00 2

6 8.0 12.0 7:10 105.96 0.29 184 48 47 1.94 1.87 2

5 12.0 16.0 7:14 109.05 0.30 186 53 48 2.00 1.94 2

4 16.0 20.0 7:18 112.20 0.26 187 55 49 1.74 1.68 2

3 20.0 24.0 7:22 115.10 0.26 186 58 50 1.74 1.68 2

2 24.0 28.0 7:26 118.10 0.28 186 60 51 1.87 1.81 2

1 28.0 32.0 7:30 121.07 0.29 186 62 52 1.94 1.88 2

8 32.0 36.0 7:43 124.25 0.39 186 61 54 2.61 2.53 2

7 36.0 40.0 7:47 127.91 0.38 185 63 55 2.54 2.47 2

6 40.0 44.0 7:51 131.49 0.37 185 66 56 2.47 2.41 2

5 44.0 48.0 7:55 135.05 0.35 185 66 56 2.34 2.28 2

4 48.0 52.0 7:59 138.48 0.27 186 67 57 1.80 1.76 2

3 52.0 56.0 8:03 141.55 0.27 185 68 58 1.80 1.77 2

2 56.0 60.0 8:07 144.59 0.25 184 68 58 1.67 1.64 2

1 60.0 64.0 8:11 147.62 0.27 187 69 59 1.80 1.77 2

64.0 8:15 150.71

Average: 51.12 0.30 185.4 59.9 52.8 2.02 1.96 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # 3FT PTC Pollutant HCL Points/Port 8 Start Finish Pre P

Company JM DGM # MB4 Method 26A Total Points 16 .005@15" .00

Location Richmond Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 4.0

Source EMF Delta ∆H@ 1.71 Date 17-Nov-10 Time/reading 4.0

Operator MY Bws (%) 6.4 # of Ports 2 Total Run 64.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume 66 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.88

Barometric 29.90 Silica Gel Weight Gain 9 DGM Y 0.994 Pm (in Hg) 30.12 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.27 Actual Dn (in) 0.31 O2 (%) 20.3 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2) 0.00052 CO2 (%) 0.4 Md 28.88 Stack Area (sf) 3.14

Est.DH(in H2O) 3.00 Ms 28.18 Act. Flow (cfm) 6,390 Must delete extra z

Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.36 Total Vol.(cf) 48.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 5,232

Preliminary Ts (oF) 125 Est. Us (ft/s) 35.9 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 4,896Preliminary Tm (oF) 85 Theor Dn (in) 0.2705 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

8 0.0 4.0 8:35 152.08 0.34 187 63 60 2.35 2.25 2

7 4.0 8.0 8:39 155.52 0.36 184 66 61 2.49 2.39 2

6 8.0 12.0 8:43 159.08 0.32 185 67 61 2.21 2.12 2

5 12.0 16.0 8:47 162.45 0.30 185 69 62 2.07 1.99 2

4 16.0 20.0 8:51 165.68 0.27 185 71 62 1.87 1.8 2

3 20.0 24.0 8:55 168.77 0.27 184 72 63 1.87 1.8 2

2 24.0 28.0 8:59 171.84 0.27 182 72 63 1.87 1.8 2

1 28.0 32.0 9:07 174.93 0.28 182 73 64 1.93 1.87 2

8 32.0 36.0 9:34 178.04 0.29 183 67 67 2.00 1.94 2

7 36.0 40.0 9:38 181.21 0.28 184 71 67 1.93 1.87 2

6 40.0 44.0 9:42 184.39 0.27 184 73 67 1.87 1.81 2

5 44.0 48.0 9:46 187.51 0.27 184 76 68 1.87 1.81 2

4 48.0 52.0 9:50 190.63 0.29 184 77 68 2.00 1.94 2

3 52.0 56.0 9:54 193.86 0.30 185 72 69 2.07 2.01 2

2 56.0 60.0 9:58 197.14 0.28 183 79 69 1.93 1.88 2

1 60.0 64.0 10:02 200.36 0.28 182 79 70 1.93 1.88 2

64.0 10:06 203.58

Average: 51.50 0.29 183.9 71.7 65.1 2.02 1.95 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # 3 ft A Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre PCompany Johns Manville DGM # MB-3 Method OTM27/28 Total Points 12 0.002 0.002 @15" @

Location Richmond, IN Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 20.1Source EMF Delta ∆H@ 1.82 Date 16-Nov-10 Time/reading 20.1

Operator MY Bws (%) 4.58 # of Ports 2 Total Run 241.0

Filter Number 10081612 Condensate Volume 72 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.78

Barometric 29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain 20 DGM Y 1.003 Pm (in Hg) 29.80 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.27 Actual Dn (in) 0.2 O2 (%) 19.90 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2) 0.00022 CO2 (%) 0.8 Md 28.92 Stack Area (sf) 3.14

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.42 Act. Flow (cfm) 7,498 Must delete extra z

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 180.7 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 5,982

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 5,708

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments:

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

6 0.0 20.1 7:21 427.57 0.43 193 43 43 0.55 0.429 2

5 20.1 40.2 7:41 435.23 0.43 194 48 45 0.55 0.429 2

4 40.2 60.2 8:01 442.91 0.42 194 56 50 0.54 0.429 2

3 60.2 80.3 8:21 450.53 0.34 194 65 59 0.44 0.434 2

2 80.3 100.4 8:41 457.35 0.34 197 71 65 0.44 0.441 2

1 100.4 120.5 9:01 464.37 0.37 198 74 69 0.48 0.442 2

6 120.5 140.6 9:39 471.69 0.39 200 73 73 0.50 0.444 2

5 140.6 160.6 9:59 479.27 0.40 201 75 73 0.51 0.445 2

4 160.6 180.7 10:19 486.81 0.45 202 79 75 0.58 0.444 2

3 180.7 200.8 10:39 494.83 0.39 203 80 77 0.50 0.444 2

2 200.8 220.9 10:59 502.29 0.39 204 80 77 0.50 0.444 2

1 220.9 241.0 11:19 509.91 0.39 204 80 77 0.50 0.443 2

241.0 11:40 517.55

Average: 89.98 0.40 198.7 68.7 65.3 0.51 0.44 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # 3 ft A Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre PCompany Johns Manville DGM # MB-3 Method OTM27/28 Total Points 12 0.000 0.000 @15" @

Location Richmond, IN Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 19.8Source EMF Delta ∆H@ 1.82 Date 16-Nov-10 Time/reading 19.8

Operator MY Bws (%) 7.23 # of Ports 2 Total Run 237.8

Filter Number 10072309 Condensate Volume 112 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.78

Barometric 29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain 32 DGM Y 1.003 Pm (in Hg) 29.80 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.27 Actual Dn (in) 0.2 O2 (%) 20.00 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2) 0.00022 CO2 (%) 0.6 Md 28.90 Stack Area (sf) 3.14

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.11 Act. Flow (cfm) 7,385 Must delete extra z

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 178.4 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 5,982

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 5,549

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

6 0.0 19.8 11:55 517.77 0.40 182 79 78 0.51 0.475 2

5 19.8 39.6 12:14 525.50 0.39 186 78 76 0.49 0.475 2

4 39.6 59.5 12:33 533.06 0.39 189 77 75 0.49 0.467 2

3 59.5 79.3 12:52 540.63 0.35 201 75 74 0.44 0.427 2

2 79.3 99.1 13:11 547.42 0.42 197 73 72 0.53 0.411 2

1 99.1 118.9 13:30 555.05 0.45 195 71 70 0.57 0.414 2

6 118.9 138.7 14:05 562.92 0.32 193 70 69 0.40 0.415 2

5 138.7 158.5 14:24 569.51 0.34 189 72 70 0.43 0.417 2

4 158.5 178.4 14:43 576.09 0.35 188 71 70 0.44 0.423 2

3 178.4 198.2 15:02 583.17 0.40 187 72 70 0.51 0.424 2

2 198.2 218.0 15:21 590.20 0.43 180 75 71 0.54 0.426 2

1 218.0 237.8 15:40 598.02 0.38 179 77 73 0.48 0.436 2

237.8 16:06 605.59

Average: 87.82 0.39 188.8 74.2 72.3 0.49 0.43 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # 3 ft A Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre PCompany Johns Manville DGM # MB-3 Method OTM27/28 Total Points 12 0.001 0.000 @12" @

Location Richmond, IN Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 17.7Source EMF Delta ∆H@ 1.82 Date 17-Nov-10 Time/reading 17.7

Operator MY Bws (%) 9.72 # of Ports 2 Total Run 212.8

Filter Number 10090237 Condensate Volume 130 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.78

Barometric 29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain 38 DGM Y 1.003 Pm (in Hg) 29.80 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.27 Actual Dn (in) 0.2 O2 (%) 20.30 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2) 0.00022 CO2 (%) 0.4 Md 28.88 Stack Area (sf) 3.14

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 27.82 Act. Flow (cfm) 6,626 Must delete extra z

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 159.6 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 5,397

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 4,872

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

6 0.0 17.7 7:43 605.64 0.25 185 53 53 0.30 0.394 2

5 17.7 35.5 8:00 611.16 0.28 186 58 56 0.34 0.394 2

4 35.5 53.2 8:17 617.08 0.30 186 62 59 0.36 0.395 2

3 53.2 70.9 8:34 623.00 0.34 186 64 61 0.41 0.397 2

2 70.9 88.7 8:51 629.29 0.34 186 66 63 0.41 0.399 2

1 88.7 106.4 9:08 635.62 0.35 186 69 65 0.42 0.4 2

6 106.4 124.2 9:35 642.00 0.29 186 69 68 0.35 0.402 2

5 124.2 141.9 9:52 647.93 0.29 186 73 70 0.35 0.404 2

4 141.9 159.6 10:09 653.79 0.30 183 75 72 0.36 0.406 2

3 159.6 177.4 10:26 659.88 0.30 185 76 73 0.36 0.411 2

2 177.4 195.1 10:43 666.00 0.32 184 77 74 0.38 0.409 2

1 195.1 212.8 11:00 672.32 0.34 184 77 75 0.41 0.411 2

212.8 11:21 678.91

Average: 73.27 0.31 185.3 68.3 65.8 0.37 0.40 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # 3ft B Pollutant Metals Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre PostCompany JM DGM # MB3 Method 29 Total Points 24 .005@15" .00@10"Location Richmond Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 8.0

Source EMF Delta ∆H@ 1.82 Date 17-Nov-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator PM Bws (%) 7.46 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0

Filter Number 10092204 Condensate Volume 197 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 30.00

Barometric 30.02 Silica Gel Weight Gain 28 DGM Y 1.003 Pm (in Hg) 30.24 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.27 Actual Dn (in) 0.31 O2 (%) 20.3 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2) 0.00052 CO2 (%) 0.4 Md 28.88 Stack Area (sf) 3.14

Est.DH(in H2O) 3.00 Ms 28.07 Act. Flow (cfm) 5,424 Must delete extra zeros in t

Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.36 Total Vol.(cf) 144.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 4,454

Preliminary Ts (oF) 125 Est. Us (ft/s) 35.9 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 4,122

Preliminary Tm (oF) 85 Theor Dn (in) 0.2720 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

12 0.0 4.0 11:58 679.14 0.25 185 74 74 1.85 1.82 250 

12 4.0 8.0 12:02 682.06 0.25 184 75 73 1.85 1.82 250 

11 8.0 12.0 12:06 685.11 0.25 184 77 74 1.85 1.82 250 

11 12.0 16.0 12:10 688.13 0.25 184 79 74 1.85 1.82 250 

10 16.0 20.0 12:14 691.14 0.30 184 80 74 2.22 2.19 250 

10 20.0 24.0 12:18 694.39 0.30 184 81 74 2.22 2.19 250 

9 24.0 28.0 12:22 697.76 0.22 185 82 75 1.63 1.61 250 

9 28.0 32.0 12:26 700.59 0.22 185 82 76 1.63 1.61 250 

8 32.0 36.0 12:30 703.36 0.22 185 83 76 1.63 1.61 250 

8 36.0 40.0 12:34 706.21 0.22 185 83 76 1.63 1.61 250 

7 40.0 44.0 12:38 709.07 0.22 186 83 77 1.63 1.61 250 

7 44.0 48.0 12:42 711.91 0.22 186 84 77 1.63 1.61 250 

6 48.0 52.0 12:46 714.73 0.18 186 84 77 1.33 1.31 250 

6 52.0 56.0 12:50 717.33 0.18 185 84 78 1.33 1.31 250 

5 56.0 60.0 12:54 719.91 0.18 185 84 78 1.33 1.31 250 

5 60.0 64.0 12:58 722.47 0.18 183 85 79 1.33 1.31 250 

4 64.0 68.0 13:02 725.06 0.19 182 85 79 1.41 1.39 250 

4 68.0 72.0 13:06 727.80 0.19 181 84 79 1.41 1.39 250 

3 72.0 76.0 13:10 730.41 0.19 180 84 79 1.41 1.39 250 

3 76.0 80.0 13:14 733.05 0.15 181 85 80 1.11 1.1 250 

2 80.0 84.0 13:18 735.44 0.15 182 85 80 1.11 1.1 250 

2 84.0 88.0 13:22 737.82 0.15 183 85 80 1.11 1.1 250 

1 88.0 92.0 13:26 740.2 0.15 182 85 80 1.11 1.1 250 1 92.0 96.0 13:30 742.57 0.15 182 85 80 1.11 1.1 250 

12 96.0 100.0 13:39 744.95 0.18 179 82 78 1.33 1.32 250 

12 100.0 104.0 13:43 747.57 0.18 179 84 80 1.33 1.32 250 

11 104.0 108.0 13:47 750.16 0.18 181 85 80 1.33 1.32 250 

11 108.0 112.0 13:51 752.73 0.18 183 86 81 1.33 1.32 250 

10 112.0 116.0 13:55 755.31 0.16 184 85 80 1.18 1.17 250 

10 116.0 120.0 13:59 757.78 0.16 185 85 81 1.18 1.17 250 

9 120.0 124.0 14:03 760.22 0.18 186 85 81 1.33 1.32 250 

9 124.0 128.0 14:07 762.8 0.18 186 86 81 1.33 1.32 250 

8 128.0 132.0 14:11 765.39 0.19 186 85 81 1.41 1.39 250 

8 132.0 136.0 14:15 768.02 0.19 186 85 81 1.41 1.39 250 

7 136.0 140.0 14:19 770.68 0.20 186 86 81 1.48 1.46 250 

7 140.0 144.0 14:23 773.39 0.20 186 86 81 1.48 1.46 250 

6 144.0 148.0 14:27 776.11 0.22 188 86 81 1.63 1.61 250 

6 148.0 152.0 14:31 778.95 0.22 188 86 81 1.63 1.61 250 

5 152.0 156.0 14:35 781.79 0.23 188 86 81 1.70 1.68 250 

5 156.0 160.0 14:39 784.69 0.23 188 86 81 1.70 1.68 250 

4 160.0 164.0 14:43 787.65 0.26 188 86 81 1.92 1.91 250 

4 164.0 168.0 14:47 790.69 0.26 187 86 81 1.92 1.91 250 

3 168.0 172.0 14:51 793.78 0.26 187 86 81 1.92 1.91 250 

3 172.0 176.0 14:55 796.84 0.26 187 86 81 1.92 1.91 250 

2 176.0 180.0 14:59 799.97 0.27 187 86 81 2.00 1.98 250 

2 180.0 184.0 15:03 803.08 0.27 186 86 81 2.00 1.98 250 

1 184.0 188.0 15:07 806.27 0.27 186 86 81 2.00 1.98 250 

1 188.0 192.0 15:11 809.42 0.27 186 86 81 2.00 1.98 250 

192.0 15:15 812.57

Average: 133.43 0.21 184.6 84.0 78.9 1.57 1.55 250 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # 3ft B Pollutant Metals Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre PostCompany JM DGM # MB3 Method 29 Total Points 24Location Richmond Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 8.0

Source EMF Delta ∆H@ 1.82 Date 18-Nov-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator PM Bws (%) 5.8 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0

Filter Number 10092202 Condensate Volume 189 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 30.18

Barometric 30.20 Silica Gel Weight Gain 36 DGM Y 1.003 Pm (in Hg) 30.42 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.27 Actual Dn (in) 0.31 O2 (%) 19.9 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2) 0.00052 CO2 (%) 0.8 Md 28.92 Stack Area (sf) 3.14

Est.DH(in H2O) 3.00 Ms 28.29 Act. Flow (cfm) 7,007 Must delete extra zeros in t

Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.36 Total Vol.(cf) 144.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 5,803

Preliminary Ts (oF) 125 Est. Us (ft/s) 35.7 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 5,465

Preliminary Tm (oF) 85 Theor Dn (in) 0.2706 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

12 0.0 4.0 7:23 813.13 0.46 183 49 49 3.46 3.17 250 

12 4.0 8.0 7:27 816.9 0.46 183 52 50 3.46 3.17 250 

11 8.0 12.0 7:31 820.78 0.46 183 56 51 3.46 3.17 250 

11 12.0 16.0 7:35 824.6 0.46 183 59 52 3.46 3.18 250 

10 16.0 20.0 7:39 828.45 0.42 184 63 53 3.15 2.92 250 

10 20.0 24.0 7:43 832.34 0.42 183 65 54 3.15 2.92 250 

9 24.0 28.0 7:47 835.97 0.40 184 68 56 3.00 2.79 250 

9 28.0 32.0 7:51 839.66 0.40 183 70 58 3.00 2.79 250 

8 32.0 36.0 7:55 843.35 0.38 184 72 59 2.85 2.66 250 

8 36.0 40.0 7:59 846.94 0.38 184 73 61 2.85 2.66 250 

7 40.0 44.0 8:03 850.51 0.40 184 74 62 3.00 2.81 250 

7 44.0 48.0 8:07 854.19 0.40 184 75 63 3.00 2.81 250 

6 48.0 52.0 8:11 857.9 0.40 184 76 65 3.00 2.82 250 

6 52.0 56.0 8:15 861.64 0.40 184 78 66 3.00 2.82 250 

5 56.0 60.0 8:19 865.36 0.38 183 78 67 2.85 2.69 250 

5 60.0 64.0 8:23 869.02 0.38 183 79 68 2.85 2.69 250 

4 64.0 68.0 8:27 872.68 0.35 183 79 68 2.63 2.49 250 

4 68.0 72.0 8:31 876.22 0.35 182 80 70 2.63 2.49 250 

3 72.0 76.0 8:35 879.78 0.35 183 81 70 2.63 2.49 250 

3 76.0 80.0 8:39 883.31 0.35 183 81 71 2.63 2.49 250 

2 80.0 84.0 8:43 886.87 0.35 182 81 71 2.63 2.49 250 

2 84.0 88.0 8:47 890.45 0.35 182 82 72 2.63 2.49 250 

1 88.0 92.0 8:51 893.97 0.35 181 82 72 2.63 2.49 250 

1 92.0 96.0 8:55 897.58 0.35 181 82 72 2.63 2.5 250 

12 96.0 100.0 9:03 901.08 0.32 179 77 74 2.40 2.29 250 

12 100.0 104.0 9:07 904.48 0.32 179 81 74 2.40 2.29 250 

11 104.0 108.0 9:11 907.85 0.32 179 84 74 2.40 2.29 250 

11 108.0 112.0 9:15 911.25 0.32 179 84 75 2.40 2.29 250 

10 112.0 116.0 9:19 914.68 0.29 179 84 75 2.18 2.08 250 

10 116.0 120.0 9:23 917.92 0.29 180 84 74 2.18 2.08 250 

9 120.0 124.0 9:27 921.14 0.30 180 84 77 2.25 2.16 250 

9 124.0 128.0 9:31 924.43 0.30 182 85 77 2.25 2.16 250 

8 128.0 132.0 9:35 927.75 0.32 184 84 77 2.40 2.3 250 8 132.0 136.0 9:39 931.18 0.32 185 85 77 2.40 2.3 250 7 136.0 140.0 9:43 934.58 0.32 185 85 77 2.40 2.3 250 7 140.0 144.0 9:47 938 0.32 185 85 78 2.40 2.3 250 

6 144.0 148.0 9:51 941.42 0.34 186 85 78 2.55 2.45 250 6 148.0 152.0 9:55 944.94 0.34 185 85 78 2.55 2.45 250 5 152.0 156.0 9:59 948.46 0.35 186 85 78 2.63 2.53 250 5 156.0 160.0 10:03 952.02 0.35 185 85 78 2.63 2.52 250 4 160.0 164.0 10:07 955.62 0.35 185 85 78 2.63 2.52 250 4 164.0 168.0 10:11 959.21 0.35 185 85 78 2.63 2.52 250 3 168.0 172.0 10:15 962.76 0.32 185 85 78 2.40 2.31 250 3 172.0 176.0 10:19 966.18 0.32 185 85 78 2.40 2.31 250 2 176.0 180.0 10:23 969.58 0.32 185 86 79 2.40 2.31 250 2 180.0 184.0 10:27 972.99 0.32 185 86 78 2.40 2.31 250 1 184.0 188.0 10:31 976.42 0.32 185 86 78 2.40 2.31 250 1 188.0 192.0 10:35 979.85 0.32 185 86 79 2.40 2.31 250 

192.0 10:39 983.3

Average: 170.17 0.36 183.1 78.4 69.7 2.68 2.54 250.0 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # 3ft B Pollutant Metals Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre PostCompany JM DGM # MB3 Method 29 Total Points 24Location Richmond Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 8.0

Source EMF Delta ∆H@ 1.82 Date 18-Nov-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator PM Bws (%) 6.7 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0

Filter Number 10092203 Condensate Volume 186 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 30.18

Barometric 30.20 Silica Gel Weight Gain 29 DGM Y 1.003 Pm (in Hg) 30.42 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.27 Actual Dn (in) 0.31 O2 (%) 20.5 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2) 0.00052 CO2 (%) 0.1 Md 28.84 Stack Area (sf) 3.14

Est.DH(in H2O) 3.00 Ms 28.11 Act. Flow (cfm) 5,765 Must delete extra zeros in t

Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.36 Total Vol.(cf) 144.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 4,763

Preliminary Ts (oF) 125 Est. Us (ft/s) 35.8 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 4,444

Preliminary Tm (oF) 85 Theor Dn (in) 0.2715 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

12 0.0 4.0 10:58 983.50 0.30 185 77 78 2.26 2.18 250 

12 4.0 8.0 11:02 986.83 0.30 185 79 77 2.26 2.18 250 

11 8.0 12.0 11:06 990.12 0.30 184 82 77 2.26 2.18 250 

11 12.0 16.0 11:10 993.41 0.30 184 82 77 2.26 2.18 250 

10 16.0 20.0 11:14 996.7 0.30 184 83 78 2.26 2.18 250 

10 20.0 24.0 11:18 1000.02 0.30 185 84 78 2.26 2.18 250 

9 24.0 28.0 11:22 1003.33 0.29 185 85 78 2.18 2.12 250 

9 28.0 32.0 11:26 1006.59 0.29 185 85 78 2.18 2.12 250 

8 32.0 36.0 11:30 1009.85 0.28 185 85 78 2.11 2.05 250 

8 36.0 40.0 11:34 1013.05 0.28 185 85 78 2.11 2.05 250 

7 40.0 44.0 11:38 1016.23 0.27 186 85 78 2.03 1.97 250 

7 44.0 48.0 11:42 1019.37 0.27 186 86 79 2.03 1.97 250 

6 48.0 52.0 11:46 1022.53 0.27 186 86 79 2.03 1.97 250 

6 52.0 56.0 11:50 1025.66 0.27 186 86 79 2.03 1.97 250 

5 56.0 60.0 11:54 1028.79 0.21 186 86 79 1.58 1.53 250 

5 60.0 64.0 11:58 1031.60 0.21 185 86 80 1.58 1.53 250 

4 64.0 68.0 12:02 1034.38 0.21 185 86 80 1.58 1.53 250 

4 68.0 72.0 12:06 1037.15 0.21 184 86 80 1.58 1.53 250 

3 72.0 76.0 12:10 1039.92 0.21 184 86 80 1.58 1.53 250 

3 76.0 80.0 12:14 1042.69 0.21 185 86 80 1.58 1.53 250 

2 80.0 84.0 12:18 1045.49 0.21 184 87 81 1.58 1.53 250 

2 84.0 88.0 12:22 1048.28 0.21 184 87 81 1.58 1.53 250 

1 88.0 92.0 12:26 1051.06 0.21 184 87 81 1.58 1.53 250 

1 92.0 96.0 12:30 1053.84 0.21 184 87 81 1.58 1.53 250 

12 96.0 100.0 12:38 1056.64 0.21 183 82 81 1.58 1.54 250 

12 100.0 104.0 12:42 1059.41 0.21 182 86 81 1.58 1.54 250 

11 104.0 108.0 12:46 1062.2 0.21 182 86 81 1.58 1.54 250 

11 108.0 112.0 12:50 1064.98 0.21 183 87 82 1.58 1.54 250 

10 112.0 116.0 12:54 1067.80 0.21 183 87 82 1.58 1.54 250 

10 116.0 120.0 12:58 1070.58 0.21 183 87 82 1.58 1.54 250 

9 120.0 124.0 13:02 1073.37 0.23 183 87 82 1.73 1.69 250 

9 124.0 128.0 13:06 1076.31 0.23 183 87 82 1.73 1.69 250 

8 128.0 132.0 13:10 1079.23 0.20 183 87 82 1.50 1.47 250 

8 132.0 136.0 13:14 1081.99 0.20 183 87 82 1.50 1.41 250 

7 136.0 140.0 13:18 1084.74 0.18 183 87 82 1.35 1.32 250 

7 140.0 144.0 13:22 1087.35 0.18 183 87 82 1.35 1.32 250 

6 144.0 148.0 13:26 1089.94 0.21 185 87 82 1.58 1.54 250 6 148.0 152.0 13:30 1092.73 0.21 185 87 82 1.58 1.54 250 5 152.0 156.0 13:34 1095.54 0.25 185 87 82 1.88 1.84 250 5 156.0 160.0 13:38 1098.58 0.25 185 87 82 1.88 1.84 250 4 160.0 164.0 13:42 1101.62 0.25 185 88 83 1.88 1.84 250 4 164.0 168.0 13:46 1104.66 0.25 185 88 83 1.88 1.84 250 3 168.0 172.0 13:50 1107.68 0.25 185 88 83 1.88 1.84 250 3 172.0 176.0 13:54 1110.75 0.25 185 88 83 1.88 1.84 250 2 176.0 180.0 13:58 1113.78 0.25 188 89 83 1.88 1.84 250 2 180.0 184.0 14:02 1116.84 0.25 188 89 84 1.88 1.84 250 1 184.0 188.0 14:06 1119.92 0.25 188 89 84 1.88 1.84 250 1 188.0 192.0 14:10 1122.98 0.25 188 89 83 1.88 1.84 250 

192.0 14:14 1126.02

Average: 142.52 0.24 184.6 86.0 80.6 1.80 1.75 250.0 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # Hg probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Johns Manville DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points 1Location Richmond, IN Rate (L/m) 1.25 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 5.0Source Electric Furnace Delta ∆H@ Date 16-Nov-10 Time/reading 5.0

Operator PM Bws (%) # of Ports 1 Total Run 120.0

Filter Number NA Condensate Volume NA Cp Ps (in Hg) 29.78Barometric 29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain NA DGM Y 1 Pm (in Hg) 29.80 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.27 Actual Dn (in) NA O2 (%) Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2) CO2 (%) Md 28.00 Stack Area (sf) 3.14

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.00 Act. Flow (cfm) #DIV/0!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 150.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #DIV/0!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #DIV/0!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B AB A B 

7:32:00 AM 0.0 188.0 255 256 1.25 1.25 6 6 0.00 0 47 46 7:37:00 AM 5.0 190.0 254 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 6.70 6.64 49 497:42:00 AM 10.0 190.0 256 254 1.25 1.25 5 5 12.84 12.73 50 497:47:00 AM 15.0 190.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 18.36 18.4 51 517:52:00 AM 20.0 190.0 254 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 25.14 25.06 52 527:57:00 AM 25.0 190.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 32.03 31.48 53 538:02:00 AM 30.0 191.0 254 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 38.15 37.76 54 548:07:00 AM 35.0 191.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 44.12 43.78 55 558:12:00 AM 40.0 191.0 254 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 49.48 49.96 55 558:17:00 AM 45.0 191.0 254 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 55.91 55.87 56 568:22:00 AM 50.0 191.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 62.40 62.14 57 578:27:00 AM 55.0 192.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 69.03 69.02 57 578:32:00 AM 60.0 192.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 75.68 76.02 57 578:37:00 AM 65.0 193.0 254 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 82.15 82.34 58 588:42:00 AM 70.0 193.0 255 256 1.25 1.25 6 6 88.38 88.21 58 588:47:00 AM 75.0 194.0 254 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 94.43 93.75 59 558:52:00 AM 80.0 194.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 100.25 99.78 59 558:57:00 AM 85.0 194.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 5 5 106.15 106.25 60 609:02:00 AM 90.0 194.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 111.65 112.15 61 619:07:00 AM 95.0 194.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 118.42 118.57 62 629:12:00 AM 100.0 195.0 254 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 125.84 125.36 62 629:17:00 AM 105.0 195.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 132.78 132.12 63 639:22:00 AM 110.0 195.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 139.12 138.54 64 649:27:00 AM 115.0 195.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 145.45 144.96 64 649:32:00 AM 120.0 195.0 254 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 151.140 151.32 64 64 

Average 120.0 192.3 254.7 254.6 57.08 56.68

Volume 151.140 151.320 

dscm 0.15 0.15 

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Pre Test Post Test 

12.0/0.0000 10.0/0.000 

Trap/ Probe Temp
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # Hg probe Pollutant Hg Points/PortCompany Johns Manville DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points 0Location Richmond, IN Rate (L/m) 1.25 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) N/ASource Electric Furnace Delta ∆H@ Date 16-Nov-10 Time/reading

Operator PM Bws (%) # of Ports 1 Total Run 120.0

Filter Number NA Condensate Volume NA Cp Ps (in Hg) 29.78Barometric 29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain NA DGM Y 1 Pm (in Hg) 29.80 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.27 Actual Dn (in) NA O2 (%) Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2) CO2 (%) Md 28.00 Stack Area (sf) 3.14

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.00 Act. Flow (cfm) #DIV/0!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 150.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #DIV/0!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #DIV/0!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B AB A B 

9:44:00 AM 0.0 195.0 256 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 0.00 0 66 66 9:49:00 AM 5.0 197.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 6.17 6.11 66 669:54:00 AM 10.0 197.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 12.35 12.24 67 679:59:00 AM 15.0 198.0 254 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 18.63 18.8 67 67

10:04:00 AM 20.0 198.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 25.12 24.91 67 6710:09:00 AM 25.0 199.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 31.58 31.37 67 6710:14:00 AM 30.0 200.0 254 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 37.98 37.77 68 6810:19:00 AM 35.0 200.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 44.20 44.23 68 6810:24:00 AM 40.0 200.0 254 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 50.24 50.51 68 6810:29:00 AM 45.0 200.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 56.29 56.75 69 6910:34:00 AM 50.0 200.0 255 256 1.25 1.25 6 6 62.25 62.87 69 6910:39:00 AM 55.0 200.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 68.23 68.94 69 6910:44:00 AM 60.0 200.0 256 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 74.91 74.98 70 7010:49:00 AM 65.0 201.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 81.31 80.94 70 7010:54:00 AM 70.0 201.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 87.81 87.08 70 7010:59:00 AM 75.0 201.0 254 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 94.31 93.3 70 7011:04:00 AM 80.0 201.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 100.74 99.68 71 7111:09:00 AM 85.0 201.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 107.04 106.16 71 7111:14:00 AM 90.0 201.0 254 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 113.22 112.71 71 7111:19:00 AM 95.0 202.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 119.20 119.31 71 7111:24:00 AM 100.0 201.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 125.25 125.9 71 7111:29:00 AM 105.0 201.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 130.06 131.25 71 7111:34:00 AM 110.0 201.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 137.56 138.87 71 7111:39:00 AM 115.0 200.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 143.90 145.27 71 7111:44:00 AM 120.0 200.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 150.54 151.08 71 71 

Average 120.0 199.8 254.9 254.8 69.2 69.20

Volume 150.540 151.080 

dscm 0.15 0.15 

Trap/ Probe Temp

12.0/0.000 10.0/0.000 

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Pre Test Post Test 
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # Hg probe Pollutant Hg Points/PortCompany Johns Manville DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points 0Location Richmond, IN Rate (L/m) 1.25 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) N/ASource Electric Furnace Delta ∆H@ Date 16-Nov-10 Time/reading

Operator PM Bws (%) # of Ports 1 Total Run 120.0

Filter Number NA Condensate Volume NA Cp Ps (in Hg) 29.78Barometric 29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain NA DGM Y 1 Pm (in Hg) 29.80 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.27 Actual Dn (in) NA O2 (%) Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2) CO2 (%) Md 28.00 Stack Area (sf) 3.14

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.00 Act. Flow (cfm) #DIV/0!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 150.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #DIV/0!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #DIV/0!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B AB A B 

2:00:00 PM 0.0 200.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 0.00 0 72 72 2:05:00 PM 5.0 200.0 254 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 6.53 7.06 72 722:10:00 PM 10.0 200.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 12.75 13.2 72 722:15:00 PM 15.0 199.0 254 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 18.04 18.93 71 712:20:00 PM 20.0 198.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 24.93 24.44 71 712:25:00 PM 25.0 199.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 30.94 31.19 71 712:30:00 PM 30.0 199.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 37.75 37.89 71 712:35:00 PM 35.0 199.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 43.76 44.6 71 712:40:00 PM 40.0 199.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 50.17 51.05 71 712:45:00 PM 45.0 199.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 56.68 57.01 71 712:50:00 PM 50.0 198.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 63.13 63.34 71 712:55:00 PM 55.0 198.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 69.60 69.1 71 713:00:00 PM 60.0 197.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 76.05 74.46 71 713:05:00 PM 65.0 197.0 254 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 82.01 81.54 71 713:10:00 PM 70.0 197.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 87.95 87.46 71 713:15:00 PM 75.0 197.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 93.92 94.56 71 713:20:00 PM 80.0 195.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 99.78 101.05 72 723:25:00 PM 85.0 195.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 105.87 107.25 72 723:30:00 PM 90.0 195.0 256 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 112.01 113.09 72 723:35:00 PM 95.0 194.0 254 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 118.26 119.04 72 723:40:00 PM 100.0 194.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 124.56 125.61 72 723:45:00 PM 105.0 193.0 254 256 1.25 1.25 6 6 130.76 130.76 71 713:50:00 PM 110.0 193.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 136.92 136.31 71 713:55:00 PM 115.0 193.0 255 256 1.25 1.25 6 6 143.12 142.91 71 714:00:00 PM 120.0 193.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 150.23 150.65 71 71 

Average 120.0 196.8 254.8 255.0 71.32 71.32

Volume 150.230 150.650 

dscm 0.15 0.15 

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Pre Test Post Test 

12.0/0.000 12/0.001 

Trap/ Probe Temp
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # Air Cooled Pollutant Hex ChromePoints/Port 12 Start Finish Pre Post

Company JM DGM # MB4 Method 61 Total Points 24 .015@12" .01@8"Location Richmond Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 8.0

Source EMF Delta ∆H@ 1.71 Date 17-Nov-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator MY Bws (%) 7.81 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume 227 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 30.00

Barometric 30.02 Silica Gel Weight Gain 33 DGM Y 0.994 Pm (in Hg) 30.24 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.27 Actual Dn (in) 0.31 O2 (%) 20.3 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2) 0.00052 CO2 (%) 0.4 Md 28.88 Stack Area (sf) 3.14

Est.DH(in H2O) 3.00 Ms 28.03 Act. Flow (cfm) 5,985 Must delete extra zeros in t

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 144.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 4,911Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 4,528Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

12 0.0 4.0 11:58 204.31 0.29 184 67 67 1.98 1.94 

12 4.0 8.0 12:02 207.44 0.29 184 65 66 1.98 1.94 

11 8.0 12.0 12:06 210.63 0.29 184 68 67 1.98 1.94 

11 12.0 16.0 12:10 213.81 0.29 184 69 67 1.98 1.94 

10 16.0 20.0 12:14 216.96 0.28 184 70 67 1.91 1.88 

10 20.0 24.0 12:18 220.09 0.28 184 71 67 1.91 1.88 

9 24.0 28.0 12:22 223.24 0.29 186 73 67 1.98 1.95 

9 28.0 32.0 12:26 226.46 0.29 186 74 67 1.98 1.95 

8 32.0 36.0 12:30 229.69 0.27 185 75 68 1.84 1.81 

8 36.0 40.0 12:34 232.81 0.27 184 75 68 1.84 1.82 

7 40.0 44.0 12:38 235.9 0.27 184 76 68 1.84 1.82 

7 44.0 48.0 12:42 239.02 0.27 185 77 69 1.84 1.82 

6 48.0 52.0 12:46 242.13 0.29 187 78 70 1.98 1.95 

6 52.0 56.0 12:50 245.37 0.30 188 79 70 2.04 2.02 

5 56.0 60.0 12:54 248.66 0.30 188 79 70 2.04 2.02 

5 60.0 64.0 12:58 251.95 0.29 187 80 71 1.98 1.95 

4 64.0 68.0 13:02 255.21 0.30 186 80 71 2.04 2.02 

4 68.0 72.0 13:06 258.49 0.30 185 80 71 2.04 2.02 

3 72.0 76.0 13:10 261.78 0.28 183 80 71 1.91 1.89 

3 76.0 80.0 13:14 264.96 0.27 183 79 71 1.84 1.82 

2 80.0 84.0 13:18 268.1 0.27 186 80 71 1.84 1.82 

2 84.0 88.0 13:22 271.28 0.27 186 80 72 1.84 1.82 

1 88.0 92.0 13:26 274.45 0.25 182 80 72 1.70 1.69 

1 92.0 96.0 13:30 277.53 0.25 180 81 72 1.71 1.69 

12 96.0 100.0 13:39 280.61 0.24 183 74 73 1.63 1.62 

12 100.0 104.0 13:43 283.59 0.23 183 79 72 1.57 1.56 

11 104.0 108.0 13:47 286.47 0.24 184 79 72 1.63 1.62 

11 108.0 112.0 13:51 289.41 0.24 184 80 73 1.63 1.63 

10 112.0 116.0 13:55 292.27 0.24 186 80 73 1.63 1.63 

10 116.0 120.0 13:59 295.24 0.24 186 80 73 1.63 1.63 

9 120.0 124.0 14:03 298.22 0.25 187 80 73 1.70 1.69 9 124.0 128.0 14:07 301.23 0.25 187 80 73 1.70 1.69 8 128.0 132.0 14:11 304.25 0.22 187 81 73 1.50 1.49 8 132.0 136.0 14:15 307.11 0.22 187 80 73 1.50 1.49 7 136.0 140.0 14:19 309.97 0.21 187 81 73 1.43 1.42 7 140.0 144.0 14:23 312.75 0.21 187 81 73 1.43 1.42 6 144.0 148.0 14:27 315.55 0.23 186 81 73 1.57 1.56 6 148.0 152.0 14:31 318.38 0.22 187 80 73 1.50 1.49 5 152.0 156.0 14:35 321.22 0.24 187 81 73 1.63 1.63 5 156.0 160.0 14:39 324.19 0.24 186 81 73 1.63 1.63 4 160.0 164.0 14:43 327.13 0.25 187 81 73 1.70 1.7 

4 164.0 168.0 14:47 330.1 0.25 186 81 73 1.70 1.7 

3 168.0 172.0 14:51 333.19 0.23 186 81 74 1.57 1.56 3 172.0 176.0 14:55 336.12 0.23 187 81 74 1.57 1.56 2 176.0 180.0 14:59 339.06 0.22 184 81 74 1.50 1.49 2 180.0 184.0 15:03 341.95 0.22 184 81 74 1.50 1.49 1 184.0 188.0 15:07 344.81 0.20 184 81 74 1.36 1.36 1 188.0 192.0 15:11 347.57 0.20 182 81 74 1.36 1.36 

192.0 15:15 350.39

Average: 146.08 0.26 185.2 78.0 71.2 1.74 1.73 #DIV/0! 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # Aircooled Pollutant Hex ChromePoints/Port 12 Start Finish Pre Post

Company JM DGM # MB4 Method 61 Total Points 24 .001@12" .001@8"Location Richmond Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 8.0

Source EMF Delta ∆H@ 1.71 Date 18-Nov-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator MY Bws (%) 5.8 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume 181 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 30.18

Barometric 30.20 Silica Gel Weight Gain 45 DGM Y 0.994 Pm (in Hg) 30.42 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.27 Actual Dn (in) 0.31 O2 (%) 19.9 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2) 0.00052 CO2 (%) 0.8 Md 28.92 Stack Area (sf) 3.14

Est.DH(in H2O) 3.00 Ms 28.29 Act. Flow (cfm) 7,122 Must delete extra zeros in t

Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.36 Total Vol.(cf) 144.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 5,890

Preliminary Ts (oF) 125 Est. Us (ft/s) 35.7 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 5,550

Preliminary Tm (oF) 85 Theor Dn (in) 0.2705 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

12 0.0 4.0 7:23 351.60 0.45 185 48 48 3.15 2.9 

12 4.0 8.0 7:27 355.19 0.45 184 53 48 3.15 2.9 11 8.0 12.0 7:31 359.06 0.44 184 58 49 3.08 2.85 

11 12.0 16.0 7:35 362.87 0.44 184 59 50 3.08 2.26 

10 16.0 20.0 7:39 366.71 0.42 184 62 51 2.94 2.74 

10 20.0 24.0 7:43 370.2 0.42 184 64 52 2.94 2.74 

9 24.0 28.0 7:47 373.96 0.42 184 66 53 2.94 2.74 

9 28.0 32.0 7:51 377.75 0.42 184 67 55 2.94 2.74 

8 32.0 36.0 7:55 381.65 0.39 184 69 56 2.73 2.56 

8 36.0 40.0 7:59 385.25 0.39 185 69 57 2.73 2.56 

7 40.0 44.0 8:03 388.94 0.38 184 71 58 2.66 2.5 

7 44.0 48.0 8:07 392.59 0.38 184 71 59 2.66 2.5 

6 48.0 52.0 8:11 396.25 0.36 184 72 59 2.52 2.37 

6 52.0 56.0 8:15 399.93 0.37 184 73 61 2.59 2.44 

5 56.0 60.0 8:19 403.39 0.39 185 74 62 2.73 2.58 

5 60.0 64.0 8:23 407.13 0.39 184 75 63 2.73 2.58 

4 64.0 68.0 8:27 410.76 0.38 184 76 63 2.66 2.52 

4 68.0 72.0 8:31 414.45 0.37 184 76 65 2.59 2.45 

3 72.0 76.0 8:35 418.09 0.35 184 77 65 2.45 2.32 

3 76.0 80.0 8:39 421.54 0.35 184 77 66 2.45 2.32 

2 80.0 84.0 8:43 425.06 0.35 183 78 66 2.45 2.59 

2 84.0 88.0 8:47 428.59 0.33 184 78 67 2.31 2.2 

1 88.0 92.0 8:51 432.01 0.31 182 78 67 2.17 2.07 

1 92.0 96.0 8:55 435.34 0.32 180 78 68 2.24 2.14 

12 96.0 100.0 9:03 438.78 0.36 184 70 68 2.52 2.4 

12 100.0 104.0 9:07 442.33 0.35 184 77 69 2.45 2.34 

11 104.0 108.0 9:11 445.84 0.34 184 79 69 2.38 2.27 

11 108.0 112.0 9:15 449.35 0.34 184 80 71 2.38 2.27 

10 112.0 116.0 9:19 452.87 0.34 184 80 70 2.38 2.27 

10 116.0 120.0 9:23 456.41 0.37 185 80 70 2.59 2.48 

9 120.0 124.0 9:27 460.09 0.35 186 81 71 2.45 2.34 

9 124.0 128.0 9:31 463.63 0.36 187 81 71 2.52 2.41 

8 128.0 132.0 9:35 467.26 0.35 186 81 71 2.45 2.35 

8 132.0 136.0 9:39 470.87 0.35 186 81 72 2.45 2.35 

7 136.0 140.0 9:43 474.47 0.35 186 81 72 2.45 2.35 

7 140.0 144.0 9:47 478.09 0.34 185 82 72 2.38 2.28 

6 144.0 148.0 9:51 481.61 0.37 185 81 72 2.59 2.48 

6 148.0 152.0 9:55 485.31 0.36 185 82 73 2.52 2.42 

5 152.0 156.0 9:59 488.94 0.38 185 81 73 2.66 2.55 

5 156.0 160.0 10:03 492.66 0.36 184 82 73 2.52 2.42 

4 160.0 164.0 10:07 496.27 0.37 184 82 73 2.59 2.49 

4 164.0 168.0 10:11 499.96 0.37 184 82 74 2.59 2.49 

3 168.0 172.0 10:15 503.68 0.37 184 82 74 2.59 2.49 

3 172.0 176.0 10:19 507.36 0.34 184 82 73 2.38 2.29 

2 176.0 180.0 10:23 510.93 0.33 184 82 73 2.31 2.22 

2 180.0 184.0 10:27 514.45 0.33 184 82 74 2.31 2.22 

1 184.0 188.0 10:31 517.97 0.31 180 82 74 2.17 2.09 

1 188.0 192.0 10:35 521.38 0.30 180 82 74 2.10 2.02 

192.0 10:39 524.74

Average: 173.14 0.37 184.1 75.1 65.3 2.58 2.43 #DIV/0! 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # Aircooled Pollutant Hex ChromePoints/Port 12 Start Finish Pre Post

Company JM DGM # MB4 Method 61 Total Points 24 .005@12" .001@8"Location Richmond Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 8.0

Source EMF Delta ∆H@ 1.71 Date 18-Nov-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator MY Bws (%) 6.9 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume 204 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 30.18

Barometric 30.20 Silica Gel Weight Gain 33 DGM Y 0.994 Pm (in Hg) 30.20 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.27 Actual Dn (in) 0.31 O2 (%) 20.5 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2) 0.00052 CO2 (%) 0.1 Md 28.84 Stack Area (sf) 3.14

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.09 Act. Flow (cfm) 6,185 Must delete extra zeros in tPreliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 144.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 5,114Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 4,763Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

12 0.0 4.0 10:58 525.21 0.37 184 73 73 2.59 2.5 

12 4.0 8.0 11:02 528.9 0.37 184 78 73 2.59 2.5 

11 8.0 12.0 11:06 532.62 0.35 184 78 72 2.45 2.38 

11 12.0 16.0 11:10 536.27 0.35 184 80 73 2.45 2.38 

10 16.0 20.0 11:14 539.84 0.33 184 80 73 2.31 2.25 

10 20.0 24.0 11:18 543.33 0.33 184 81 73 2.31 2.25 

9 24.0 28.0 11:22 546.8 0.33 185 81 73 2.31 2.25 

9 28.0 32.0 11:26 550.27 0.33 185 81 73 2.31 2.25 

8 32.0 36.0 11:30 553.73 0.33 185 82 73 2.31 2.25 

8 36.0 40.0 11:34 557.20 0.33 185 82 73 2.31 2.25 

7 40.0 44.0 11:38 560.66 0.30 185 82 73 2.10 2.05 

7 44.0 48.0 11:42 564 0.29 184 82 74 2.03 1.98 

6 48.0 52.0 11:46 567.33 0.28 185 83 74 1.96 1.91 

6 52.0 56.0 11:50 570.57 0.28 185 83 74 1.96 1.91 

5 56.0 60.0 11:54 573.82 0.28 185 83 74 1.96 1.91 

5 60.0 64.0 11:58 577.04 0.28 184 83 74 1.96 1.91 

4 64.0 68.0 12:02 580.26 0.29 185 83 75 2.03 1.98 

4 68.0 72.0 12:06 583.55 0.29 185 83 75 2.03 1.98 

3 72.0 76.0 12:10 586.83 0.28 185 83 75 1.96 1.91 

3 76.0 80.0 12:14 590.07 0.27 184 84 76 1.89 1.84 

2 80.0 84.0 12:18 593.24 0.25 183 84 76 1.75 1.71 

2 84.0 88.0 12:22 596.33 0.25 183 84 76 1.75 1.71 

1 88.0 92.0 12:26 599.34 0.23 181 84 76 1.61 1.57 

1 92.0 96.0 12:30 602.25 0.22 180 84 76 1.54 1.51 

12 96.0 100.0 12:38 605.12 0.32 184 77 76 2.24 2.19 

12 100.0 104.0 12:42 608.52 0.32 185 83 76 2.24 2.19 

11 104.0 108.0 12:46 611.96 0.34 186 83 76 2.38 2.33 

11 108.0 112.0 12:50 615.49 0.30 184 83 76 2.10 2.05 

10 112.0 116.0 12:54 618.89 0.28 184 84 76 1.96 1.92 

10 116.0 120.0 12:58 622.04 0.28 184 84 76 1.96 1.92 

9 120.0 124.0 13:02 625.3 0.28 184 84 76 1.96 1.92 

9 124.0 128.0 13:06 628.54 0.28 185 84 77 1.96 1.92 

8 128.0 132.0 13:10 631.78 0.25 184 84 77 1.75 1.71 

8 132.0 136.0 13:14 634.84 0.25 185 84 77 1.75 1.71 

7 136.0 140.0 13:18 637.89 0.24 184 84 77 1.68 1.64 

7 140.0 144.0 13:22 640.87 0.23 184 84 77 1.61 1.58 

6 144.0 148.0 13:26 643.83 0.23 184 84 77 1.61 1.58 

6 148.0 152.0 13:30 646.76 0.23 184 85 77 1.61 1.58 

5 152.0 156.0 13:34 649.71 0.22 184 85 77 1.54 1.51 

5 156.0 160.0 13:38 652.58 0.22 184 85 77 1.54 1.51 

4 160.0 164.0 13:42 655.45 0.22 184 85 77 1.54 1.51 

4 164.0 168.0 13:46 658.31 0.22 184 85 77 1.54 1.51 

3 168.0 172.0 13:50 661.17 0.25 184 85 77 1.75 1.71 

3 172.0 176.0 13:54 664.21 0.24 185 86 78 1.68 1.65 

2 176.0 180.0 13:58 667.31 0.24 185 86 78 1.68 1.65 

2 180.0 184.0 14:02 670.31 0.21 185 86 78 1.47 1.44 

1 184.0 188.0 14:06 673.11 0.21 183 86 78 1.47 1.44 

1 188.0 192.0 14:10 675.92 0.21 182 86 78 1.47 1.44 

192.0 14:14 678.76

Average: 153.55 0.28 184.1 83.0 75.5 1.94 1.89 #DIV/0! 

Leak Check


































APPENDIX D 

EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION DOCUMENTS 
Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentration Results Summary

Johns Manville - Richmond, Indiana

BTEC Project No. 10-3990.07

Sampling Dates: November 16-18, 2010

Melt Furnace

Parameter Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 5 Run 6 Average

Test Run Date 11/16/2010 11/16/2010 11/17/2010 11/17/2010 11/18/2010 11/18/2010Oxygen concentration (%) 20.1 20.2 20.3 20.3 19.9 20.5 20.2Oxygen concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A) 19.9 20.0 20.3 20.3 19.9 20.5 20.1Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.1 0.5Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A) 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.1 0.6CO2 Correction O2 Correction

1 2 3 4 5 6 1

Co 0.00 0.00 -0.01 -0.01 -0.01 -0.01 Co 0.20 0.

Cma 10.10 10.10 10.10 10.10 10.10 10.10 Cma 10.00 10.

Cm 10.0 10.0 10.02 10.02 10.02 10.02 Cm 10.2 10

Co= Average of initial and final zero gasesCma=Actual concentration of the calibration gasCm= Average of initial and final calibration gases
APPENDIX E 

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS 
Corrected Corrected Correc

Volume 

(mL)

Acetone 

(mg)

Filter 

(mg)

Organic 

(mg)

Inorganic 

(mg)

Acetone 

(mg) Filter (mg)

Ace + Fi

(mg)

Baghouse Stack R1 41.00 1.80 ND 3.10 2.60 0.88 0.30 1.18 

Baghouse Stack R2 44.00 1.00 ND 3.20 3.10 0.50 0.30 0.80 Baghouse Stack R3 58.00 1.00 ND 4.10 2.70 0.50 0.30 0.80 

Blank 49.00 1.10 0.40 3.20 0.70

OTM 27/28 PM2.5 Lab Results

Johns Manville

BTEC Project No. 10-3990.07

Sampling Date: November 16-17, 2010

Richmond, Indiana
Corrected Corrected Cor

Volume 

(mL)

Acetone 

(mg)

Filter 

(mg)

Acetone 

(mg) Filter (mg)

Ace + 

(m

Baghouse Stack R3 92.00 1.60 ND 1.60 0.30 1

Baghouse Stack R4 61.00 0.90 ND 0.90 0.30 1Baghouse Stack R5 54.00 1.60 ND 1.60 0.30 1

Blank 83.00 ND ND ND

Sampling Date: November 17-18, 2010

Method 5 PM Lab Results

Johns Manville

Richmond, Indiana

BTEC Project No. 10-3990.07
Compound/Fraction

Blank 

Result

(μg)

Blank 

Detection 

Limit

(μg)

Run 1 

Result

(μg)

Run 2 

Result

(μg)

Run 3 

Result

(μg)

Test Run 

Detection 

Limit

(μg)

Run 1 

Result

(μg)

Run 2 

Result

(μg)

Run 3 

Result

(μg)

Blank 

Correction

Run 1

Blank-Corrected 

Result

(μg)

Antimony ND 0.40 ND ND ND 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.00 0.80 Arsenic 1.08 0.40 ND 0.91 1.08 0.80 0.80 0.91 1.08 1.08 0.80 Berylium ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.20 Cadmium 0.25 0.10 0.28 0.54 ND 0.20 0.28 0.54 0.20 0.25 0.20 Chromium 1.26 0.30 4.13 2.77 2.15 0.60 4.13 2.77 2.15 1.26 2.87 Cobalt ND 0.10 1.06 1.81 ND 0.20 1.06 1.81 0.20 0.00 1.06 Lead 1.01 0.20 6.58 11.40 1.57 0.40 6.58 11.40 1.57 1.01 5.57 Manganese 1.01 0.75 4.10 18.90 2.10 1.50 4.10 18.90 2.10 1.01 3.09 Nickle ND 0.50 4.10 6.20 2.30 1.00 4.10 6.20 2.30 0.00 4.10 Selenium ND 1.00 2.20 5.40 5.00 2.00 2.20 5.40 5.00 0.00 2.20 

Uncorrected value (accounting for ND)

Melt Furnace

Sampling Date: November 17-18, 2010

Method 29 Non-Hg HAP Metals Lab Results

Johns Manville

Richmond, Indiana

BTEC Project No. 10-3990.07
Corrected Corrected 

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 1 Run 2 

Baghouse Stack 1.00 0.40 0.60 0.80 0.20 

MDL 0.50 0.40 0.40 0.80 0.40 

Blank H2O ND

Blank KOH 0.20

All units ug.

Blank corrected values are below MDL. MDL used for calculations.

Method 0061 Lab Results

Richmond, Indiana

BTEC Project No. 10-3990.07

Sampling Date: November 17-18, 2010

Johns Manville
Your Project #: 10-3990.07 

 Site: JM RICHMOND

Your C.O.C. #: N/A

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/12/06

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0G8040

Received: 2010/11/22, 14:00

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 10

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 5 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061) 

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. (1 ) 5 2010/11/30 2010/11/30 BRL SOP-00108 EPA Method 26A 

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 5 N/A 2010/11/30 

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 5 N/A 2010/11/26 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8040 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/06 Project name: JM RICHMOND

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H X 9 3 9 8 H X 9 3 9 9 H X 9 4 0 0 H X 9 4 0 0

Sampling Date 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 2010/11/16 2010/11/16

COC Number N/A N/A N/A N/A

 U n i t s BLANK-H2O-M26A BLANK-H2SO4-M26A RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M26A-H2SO4 1-M26A-H2SO4

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 340 420 450 1 2345550

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND ND ND 200 2345563

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND ND ND 200 2345563

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H X 9 4 0 1 H X 9 4 0 2 H X 9 4 0 3 H X 9 4 0 4

Sampling Date 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 2010/11/18 2010/11/18

COC Number N/A N/A

 U n i t s RUN RUN QC Batch BLANK-H2O-M0061 BLANK-KOH-M0061 RDL QC Batch

2-M26A-H2SO4 3-M26A-H2SO4

Volume ml 430 440 2345550 490 300 1 2340672

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug ND 0.2 0.2 2340664

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND 2345563 200

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND 2345563 200

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H X 9 4 0 5 H X 9 4 0 5 H X 9 4 0 6 H X 9 4 0 7

Sampling Date 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 2010/11/18 2010/11/18

COC Number

 U n i t s RUN RUN RDL RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M0061 1-M0061 2-M0061 3-M0061

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 950 1 810 850 1 2340672

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.4 2340664

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8040 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/06 Project name: JM RICHMOND

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HX9398 Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2345563 2010/11/30 2010/11/30 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2345550 N/A 2010/11/30 A_S

Maxxam ID HX9399 Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID BLANK-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2345563 2010/11/30 2010/11/30 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2345550 N/A 2010/11/30 A_S

Maxxam ID HX9400 Collected 2010/11/16

Sample ID RUN 1-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2345563 2010/11/30 2010/11/30 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2345550 N/A 2010/11/30 A_S

Maxxam ID HX9400 D u p Collected 2010/11/16

Sample ID RUN 1-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2345563 2010/11/30 2010/11/30 A_S

Maxxam ID HX9401 Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID RUN 2-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2345563 2010/11/30 2010/11/30 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2345550 N/A 2010/11/30 A_S

Maxxam ID HX9402 Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID RUN 3-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2345563 2010/11/30 2010/11/30 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2345550 N/A 2010/11/30 A_S

Page 3 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8040 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/06 Project name: JM RICHMOND

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HX9403 Collected 2010/11/18

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2340664 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2340672 N/A 2010/11/26 FMO

Maxxam ID HX9404 Collected 2010/11/18

Sample ID BLANK-KOH-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2340664 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2340672 N/A 2010/11/26 FMO

Maxxam ID HX9405 Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2340664 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2340672 N/A 2010/11/26 FMO

Maxxam ID HX9405 D u p Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2340664 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 LLE

Maxxam ID HX9406 Collected 2010/11/18

Sample ID RUN 2-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2340664 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2340672 N/A 2010/11/26 FMO

Maxxam ID HX9407 Collected 2010/11/18

Sample ID RUN 3-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2340664 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2340672 N/A 2010/11/26 FMO

Page 4 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8040 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/06 Project name: JM RICHMOND

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.07

P.O. #:

Project name: JM RICHMOND

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0G8040

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2340664 LLE Matrix Spike

(HX9405) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/25 104 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/25 101 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/25 ND, RDL=0.2 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/25 NC % 20

2345563 A_S Matrix Spike

(HX9400) Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/30 95 % 80 - 120

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/30 98 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/30 96 % 90 - 110

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/30 101 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/30 ND, RDL=200 ug

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/30 ND, RDL=200 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/30 NC % 20

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/30 NC % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 6 of 6
Your Project #: 10-3990.07 

 Site: JM RICHMOND

Your C.O.C. #: 0698

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/12/01

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0G8002

Received: 2010/11/22, 14:00

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 8

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) (1 ) 4 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28 

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) (1 ) 4 2010/11/29 2010/11/29 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28 

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) (2 ) 4 N/A 2010/11/25 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM - 027 

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) (2 ) 4 2010/11/23 2010/11/30 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM - 027 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/11/24 

Weight of DCM Received 4 N/A 2010/11/24 

Weight of Water from Impingers 4 N/A 2010/11/24 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This is a non-accredited test.

(2) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8002 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/01 Project name: JM RICHMOND

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H X 9 1 5 3 H X 9 1 5 4 H X 9 1 5 5 H X 9 1 5 6 H X 9 1 5 9

Sampling Date 2010/11/17 2010/11/16 2010/11/16 2010/11/17 2010/11/17

COC Number 0698 0698 0698 0698

 U n i t s TRAIN R1-OTM28 R2-OTM28 R3-OTM28 TRAIN RDL QC Batch

BLANK-OTM28 BLANK-OTM27

< 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 1.1 0.5 2337916

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg 0.40 0.30 2339631

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5) ml 49 1 2338096

Weight g 270 260 270 280 0.1 2339505

DCM Weight g 140 130 180 160 0.1 2339503

Inorganic Condensible PM mg 0.70 2.6 3.1 2.7 0.50 2343448

Organic Condensible PM mg 3.2 3.1 3.2 4.1 1.0 2339500

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H X 9 1 6 0 H X 9 1 6 1 H X 9 1 6 2

Sampling Date 2010/11/16 2010/11/16 2010/11/17

COC Number

 U n i t s R1-OTM27 R2-OTM27 R3-OTM27 RDL QC Batch

< 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 1.8 1.0 1.0 0.5 2337916

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg ND ND ND 0.30 2339631

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5) ml 41 44 58 1 2338096

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8002 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/01 Project name: JM RICHMOND

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HX9153 Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2339500 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2343448 2010/11/29 2010/11/29 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2339503 N/A 2010/11/24

Weight of Water from Impingers 2339505 N/A 2010/11/24 FMO

Maxxam ID HX9154 Collected 2010/11/16

Sample ID R1-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2339500 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2343448 2010/11/29 2010/11/29 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2339503 N/A 2010/11/24

Weight of Water from Impingers 2339505 N/A 2010/11/24 FMO

Maxxam ID HX9155 Collected 2010/11/16

Sample ID R2-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2339500 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2343448 2010/11/29 2010/11/29 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2339503 N/A 2010/11/24

Weight of Water from Impingers 2339505 N/A 2010/11/24 FMO

Maxxam ID HX9156 Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID R3-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2339500 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2343448 2010/11/29 2010/11/29 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2339503 N/A 2010/11/24

Weight of Water from Impingers 2339505 N/A 2010/11/24 FMO

Maxxam ID HX9159 Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2339631 N/A 2010/11/25 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2337916 2010/11/23 2010/11/30 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2338096 N/A 2010/11/24 NUA

Page 3 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8002 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/01 Project name: JM RICHMOND

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HX9160 Collected 2010/11/16

Sample ID R1-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2339631 N/A 2010/11/25 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2337916 2010/11/23 2010/11/30 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2338096 N/A 2010/11/24 NUA

Maxxam ID HX9161 Collected 2010/11/16

Sample ID R2-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2339631 N/A 2010/11/25 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2337916 2010/11/23 2010/11/30 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2338096 N/A 2010/11/24 NUA

Maxxam ID HX9162 Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID R3-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2339631 N/A 2010/11/25 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2337916 2010/11/23 2010/11/30 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2338096 N/A 2010/11/24 NUA

Page 4 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8002 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/01 Project name: JM RICHMOND

GENERAL COMMENTS

Sample HX9153-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HX9154-01: Different sampling dates were found on DI water rinse (2010-11-16) and DCM/Acetone rinse (2010-11-17) of R-1.

ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Brownish oily material found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HX9155-01: Different sampling dates were found on DI water rinse (2010-11-16) and DCM/Acetone rinse (2010-11-17) of R-2.

ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Brownish oily material found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HX9156-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Brownish oily material found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027): Reagent blank HX9158-01R contained a film of residues after evaporation

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027): Negative weights observed, see comments below

Maxxam # Filter Condition

HX9157-01RNormal

HX9159-01RNormal

HX9160-01RFT

HX9161-01RNormal

HX9162-01RNormal

Normal Filters received in normal condition

FT Filter torn

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.07

P.O. #:

Project name: JM RICHMOND

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0G8002

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2337916 NUA Method Blank < 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse 2010/11/30 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2339500 MGE Spiked Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/25 95 % 70 - 130

Spiked Blank DUP Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/25 93 % 70 - 130

RPD Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/25 2.4 % 20

Method Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/25 ND, RDL=1.0 mg

2343448 MGE Method Blank Inorganic Condensible PM 2010/11/29 ND, RDL=0.50 mg

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Page 6 of 6
Your Project #: 10-3990.07 

 Site: JM RICHMOND

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/12/06

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0G8018

Received: 2010/11/22, 14:00

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 4

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Metals in Combined Train (6020) (1 ) 4 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 BRL SOP-00103/ BRL EPA 6020 / M29 

SOP-00102

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) (1 ) 4 2010/11/23 2010/11/26 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315 

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) (1 ) 4 N/A 2010/11/25 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315/NJATM1 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/11/25 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 1 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8018 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/06 Project name: JM RICHMOND

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H X 9 3 2 4 H X 9 3 2 5 H X 9 3 2 6 H X 9 3 2 7

Sampling Date 2010/11/18 2010/11/17 2010/11/18 2010/11/18

 U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 2-M5/29 3-M5/29

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 1.6 0.9 1.6 0.5 2338097

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg ND ND ND ND 0.30 2339642

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 83 92 61 54 1 2338099

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8018 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/06 Project name: JM RICHMOND

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H X 9 3 2 4 H X 9 3 2 5 H X 9 3 2 5 H X 9 3 2 6 H X 9 3 2 7

Sampling Date 2010/11/18 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 2010/11/18 2010/11/18

 U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RDL RUN RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 1-M5/29 2-M5/29 3-M5/29

Lab-Dup

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 0.40 ND ND ND ND 0.80 2347965

Total Arsenic (As) ug 1.08 0.40 ND ND 0.91 1.08 0.80 2347965

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND ND 0.20 2347965

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug 0.25 0.10 0.28 0.31 0.54 ND 0.20 2347965

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 1.26 0.30 4.13 4.42 2.77 2.15 0.60 2347965

Total Cobalt (Co) ug ND 0.10 1.06 1.10 1.81 ND 0.20 2347965

Total Lead (Pb) ug 1.01 0.20 6.58 6.91 11.4 1.57 0.40 2347965

Total Manganese (Mn) ug 1.01 0.75 4.1 4.2 18.9 2.1 1.5 2347965

Total Nickel (Ni) ug ND 0.50 4.1 4.3 6.2 2.3 1.0 2347965

Total Selenium (Se) ug ND 1.0 2.2 2.8 5.4 5.0 2.0 2347965

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8018 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/06 Project name: JM RICHMOND

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HX9324 Collected 2010/11/18

Sample ID BLANK-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2347965 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2338097 2010/11/23 2010/11/26 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2339642 N/A 2010/11/25 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2338099 N/A 2010/11/25 NUA

Maxxam ID HX9325 Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2347965 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2338097 2010/11/23 2010/11/26 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2339642 N/A 2010/11/25 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2338099 N/A 2010/11/25 NUA

Maxxam ID HX9325 D u p Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2347965 2010/12/03 2010/12/03 N_R

Maxxam ID HX9326 Collected 2010/11/18

Sample ID RUN 2-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2347965 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2338097 2010/11/23 2010/11/26 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2339642 N/A 2010/11/25 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2338099 N/A 2010/11/25 NUA

Maxxam ID HX9327 Collected 2010/11/18

Sample ID RUN 3-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2347965 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2338097 2010/11/23 2010/11/26 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2339642 N/A 2010/11/25 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2338099 N/A 2010/11/25 NUA

Page 4 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8018 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/06 Project name: JM RICHMOND

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201): Negative weights observed

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Metals in Combined Train (6020): Extra 2x dilution was required for all samples except HX9324, due to the matrix.

Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample HX9325.

Trace level As was observed in the Processed Blank.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.07

P.O. #:

Project name: JM RICHMOND

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0G8018

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2338097 NUA Method Blank Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone 2010/11/26 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2347965 N_R Matrix Spike

(HX9325) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/12/03 99 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HX9325) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/12/03 98 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/12/03 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HX9325) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/12/03 95 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HX9325) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/12/03 91 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/12/03 4.3 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HX9325) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/12/03 93 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HX9325) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/12/03 92 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/12/03 1.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HX9325) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/12/03 94 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HX9325) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/12/03 92 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/12/03 2.2 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HX9325) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/12/03 101 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HX9325) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/12/03 98 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/12/03 3.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HX9325) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/12/03 102 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HX9325) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/12/03 97 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/12/03 5.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HX9325) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/12/03 104 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HX9325) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/12/03 103 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/12/03 1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HX9325) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/12/03 103 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HX9325) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/12/03 102 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/12/03 1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HX9325) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/12/03 100 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HX9325) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/12/03 95 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/12/03 5.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HX9325) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/12/03 93 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HX9325) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/12/03 89 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/12/03 4.4 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/12/03 98 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/12/03 97 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/12/03 0.7 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/12/03 97 % 85 - 115

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 6 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.07

P.O. #:

Project name: JM RICHMOND

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0G8018

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2347965 N_R Spiked Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/12/03 97 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/12/03 0.7 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/12/03 98 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/12/03 98 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/12/03 0.7 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/12/03 96 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/12/03 95 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/12/03 1.2 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/12/03 96 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/12/03 100 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/12/03 3.9 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/12/03 101 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/12/03 101 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/12/03 0.6 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/12/03 102 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/12/03 100 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/12/03 1.8 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/12/03 99 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/12/03 100 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/12/03 0.9 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/12/03 99 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/12/03 99 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/12/03 0.7 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/12/03 97 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/12/03 98 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/12/03 1.5 % 20

Method Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/12/03 0.86, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/12/03 0.84, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/12/03 0.84, RDL=0.50 ug

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 7 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.07

P.O. #:

Project name: JM RICHMOND

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0G8018

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2347965 N_R RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Total Arsenic (As) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/12/03 6.7 % 20

Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/12/03 4.4 % 20

Total Lead (Pb) 2010/12/03 4.9 % 20

Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Total Selenium (Se) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 8 of 8
Ohio Lumex Co., Inc.

9263 Ravenna Rd., Unit A-3

Twinsburg, OH 44087

Phone: (330) 405-0837

Fax: (330) 405-0847

www.ohiolumex.com

Other

Client Name BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. Report Number BTEnvironmental120310 Report 1 of 2

Date 12/3/2010

Contact Name Phone (248)-548-8072 

Trap I.D. Test Location Date Analyzed Scientist

 Mass ng 

Sect.1

 Mass ng 

Sect.2

Spike 

Level 

Date(s) in 

Stack Comments

80276 Kansas City 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 43.9 0.16 11/8/2010 K2 Furnace, Run 1, Trap A

80462 Kansas City 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 64.2 0.02 20 11/8/2010 K2 Furnace, Run 1, Trap B

80493 Kansas City 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 43.9 0 11/8/2010 K2 Furnace, Run 2, Trap A

80474 Kansas City 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 61.8 0.18 20 11/8/2010 K2 Furnace, Run 2, Trap B

80490 Kansas City 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 47.9 0.64 11/8/2010 K2 Furnace, Run 3, Trap A

70639 Kansas City 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 58.8 0 20 11/8/2010 K2 Furnace, Run 3, Trap B

80275 Kansas City 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 0.47 0.31 K2 Furnace, Blank

80452 Kansas City 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 20.1 0.26 20 K2 Furnace, Blank

80340 Melt Furnace 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 379 0.59 11/16/2010 Run 1, Trap A

70859 Melt Furnace 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 403 0.83 20 11/16/2010 Run 1, Trap B

80322 Melt Furnace 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 381 0 11/16/2010 Run 2, Trap A

80270 Melt Furnace 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 406 1.10 20 11/16/2010 Run 2, Trap B

80266 Melt Furnace 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 372 0.82 11/16/2010 Run 3, Trap A

70864 Melt Furnace 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 399 0.65 20 11/16/2010 Run 3, Trap B

80298 Melt Furnace 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 0 0.04 Blank

80291 Melt Furnace 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 20.3 0.21 20 Blank

82389 Waterville, OH 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 0.70 0.64 11/16/2010 Units 29&30 Osprey, Run 1, Trap A

80399 Waterville, OH 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 20.0 0.79 20 11/16/2010 Units 29&30 Osprey, Run 1, Trap B

80333 Waterville, OH 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 1.02 0 11/16/2010 Units 29&30 Osprey, Run 2, Trap A

70845 Waterville, OH 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 21.3 0.26 20 11/16/2010 Units 29&30 Osprey, Run 2, Trap B

Variability +- 10%

Turn - Around Time

Standard

48 hour rush

Less than .257 ng is considered "< LDL." Which is less 

than the lowest detection limit.

Plant/Source

Sorbent Trap Analysis Report

Calibration Report Available

Barry Boulianne bboulianne@sbcglobal.net Matthew Smith 

msmith@btecinc.com

Certain Teed, JM Richmond, Johns Manville 

Ohio Lumex Co., Inc.

9263 Ravenna Rd., Unit A-3

Twinsburg, OH 44087

Phone: (330) 405-0837

Fax: (330) 405-0847

www.ohiolumex.com

Other

Client Name BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. Report Number BTEnvironmental120310 Report 2 of 2

Date 12/3/2010

Contact Name Phone (248)-548-8072 

Trap I.D. Test Location Date Analyzed Scientist

 Mass ng 

Sect.1

 Mass ng 

Sect.2

Spike 

Level 

Date(s) in 

Stack Comments

80302 Waterville, OH 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 0.51 0 11/17/2010 Units 29&30 Osprey, Run 3, Trap A

82423 Waterville, OH 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 20.5 0.06 20 11/17/2010 Units 29&30 Osprey, Run 3, Trap B

82355 Waterville, OH 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 0.44 0.82 11/17/2010 Units 29&30 Osprey, Blank, Trap A

82420 Waterville, OH 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 21.1 0 20 11/17/2010 Units 29&30 Osprey, Blank, Trap B

Variability +- 10%

Barry Boulianne bboulianne@sbcglobal.net Matthew Smith 

msmith@btecinc.com

Plant/Source Certain Teed, JM Richmond, Johns Manville 

Sorbent Trap Analysis Report

Calibration Report Available

Less than .257 ng is considered "< LDL." Which is less 

than the lowest detection limit.

Turn - Around Time

Standard

48 hour rush