alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEMORANDUM 

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants, Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602 

FROM: Sara Ohrel, EPA 

SUBJECT: May 14, 2015 Meeting on Biogenic Carbon Accounting with Green Power Institute 

SUMMARY 

A meeting was held in person between EPA staff and Green Power Institute staff. The discussion 

included biogenic carbon accounting in the 2014 EPA Framework for Assessing Biogenic CO2 and related 

accounting in the Clean Power Plan context. 

ATTENDEES 

Green Power Institute 

Gregg Morris 

US EPA

OAR, OAP, Climate Change Division: Sara Ohrel, Jeff Cole
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5117 Received in Senate (RDS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5117

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 14, 2006

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To exempt persons with disabilities from the prohibition against 
       providing section 8 rental assistance to college students.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES FROM SECTION 8 RENTAL 
              ASSISTANCE PROHIBITION.

    Subsection (a) of section 327 of Public Law 109-115 (119 Stat. 
2466) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (7); and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(6) is not a person with disabilities, as such term is 
        defined in section 3(b)(3)(E) of the United States Housing Act 
        of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437a(b)(3)(E)) and was not receiving 
        assistance under such section 8 as of November 30, 2005; and''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 13, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5255 

To prohibit a school from receiving Federal funds if the school prevents 

a student from displaying or wearing in a respectful manner a representation of the flag of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 2, 2006 

Mr. JONES of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To prohibit a school from receiving Federal funds if the 

school prevents a student from displaying or wearing 

in a respectful manner a representation of the flag of 

the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Flag Display 

5 Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5255 IH 

1 (1) The most important symbol of any Nation 

2 is the national flag.

3 (2) Since ancient times, flags or banners have 

4 served to identify and unify groups of people, espe5 cially in times of war.

6 (3) On June 14, 1777, the Continental Con7 gress passed the following resolution: ‘‘Resolved, 

8 that the flag of the thirteen United States be thir9 teen stripes alternate red and white; that the union 

10 be thirteen stars, white in a blue field, representing 

11 a new constellation.’’. 

12 (4) Today, the American flag has 13 horizontal 

13 stripes, 7 red and 6 white. These stripes represent 

14 the 13 original States. The flag still has its field of 

15 blue, which represents the Union and today contains 

16 50 stars, one for each State. 

17 (5) The United Sates Code specifies a Pledge of 

18 Allegiance to the Flag, and states that the flag 

19 should be displayed on all days. 

20 (6) President Theodore Roosevelt said, ‘‘There 

21 can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says 

22 he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an 

23 American at all. We have room for but one flag, the 

24 American flag.’’ 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5255 IH 

1 (7) Certain public school officials have at2 tempted to ban students’ display of the flag of the 

3 United States. 

4 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON RECEIPT OF FEDERAL FUNDS. 

5 No funds from any Federal source may be provided 

6 by contract or by grant to an elementary school, secondary 

7 school, or institution of higher education (including any 

8 subelement of such school or institution) if the school or 

9 institution (or subelement) has a policy or practice (re10 gardless of when implemented) that either prohibits, or 

11 in effect prevents, the right of a student to display or 

12 wear, in a respectful manner, a representation of the flag 

13 of the United States in a manner that is at least equal 

14 in quality and scope to the right of a student to display 

15 or wear, in a respectful manner, any other representation. 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Unassociated Document


 



Exhibit 10.66


 


SUMMARY OF THE 2011 BONUS PLAN


 


A bonus pool has been set for achievement of various levels of 2011 consolidated adjusted EBITDA set by the Compensation Committee.  The target payouts (as a percentage of 2011 base compensation) and performance targets under the 2011 Bonus Plan for the bonus pool in which the named executive officers (other than Mr. Jacquay) participate are as follows:








	  	
(dollars in millions)


	
Percentage of 2011 Base Compensation

	
26%

	  	
29%

	  	
32%

	  	
35%

	  	
38%

	  	
41%

	  	
44%

	  	
47%

	  	
50%


	
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA

	
$177.2

	  	
$184.2

	  	
$191.2

	  	
$198.2

	  	
$205.2

	  	
$212.2

	  	
$219.2

	  	
$226.2

	  	
$233.2












The target payouts (as a percentage of 2011 base compensation) and performance targets under the 2011 Bonus Plan for Mr. Jacquay are as follows:








	  	
(dollars in millions)


	
Target Payout

	
$0.186

	  	
$0.207

	  	
$0.229

	  	
$0.250

	  	
$0.271

	  	
$0.293

	  	
$0.314

	  	
$0.336

	  	
$0.357


	
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA

	
$177.2

	  	
$184.2

	  	
$191.2

	  	
$198.2

	  	
$205.2

	  	
$212.2

	  	
$219.2

	  	
$226.2

	  	
$233.2












The achievement of $198.2 million in adjusted EBITDA (the “2011 Bonus Target”) serves as the bonus target for the named executive officers under the 2008 Employment Agreements.  If the 2011 Bonus Target is not achieved, no bonus payments are required to be made to these executives.  When the 2011 Bonus Target is met or exceeded, the Compensation Committee retains the right to pay these officers additional discretionary amounts from a $1.0 million discretionary pool that is over and above the bonus pool established based upon the percentage of 2011 base compensation at the level of consolidated adjusted EBITDA achieved at the 2011 Bonus Target or higher levels.  The bonus pool
will be increased or decreased based upon the percentage of base compensation associated with the adjusted EBITDA achieved set forth in the 2011 Bonus Plan.  Bonus payments to employees from the bonus pool are discretionary except that in accordance with their employment agreements, each of the named executive officers is entitled to a bonus in the amount of 35% of his base salary (or for Mr. Jacquay, $250,000) upon the achievement of the 2011 Bonus Target.







Each named executive officer will be entitled to receive payment of his bonus, if any, for 2011 by March 15, 2012, if he is employed on December 31, 2011.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cirracor, Inc. a Nevada corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Reed Fisher, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by
         Section 906 has been provided to Cirracor, Inc., and will be retained
         by Cirracor, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
         Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/ Reed Fisher
--------------------------
Reed Fisher
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
February 21, 2005
**Exhibit 10(q)**EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT          This EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made as of the 1st day of May, 2006 by andbetween BARRIER SYSTEMS, INC., a California corporation, with its principal place of businesslocated at 180 River Road, Rio Vista, California 94571 (the “Company”) and Owen Denman, anindividual, residing at 9528 Crystal Bay Ln, Elk Grove, CA (the “Executive”), and, contingent uponthe closing of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (as defined below) and as ofthe Closing Date (as defined in the Merger Agreement), shall supersede all prior employment,consulting and compensation agreements or arrangements, if any, between the Executive and theCompany or any of its affiliates (including, without limitation, that certain Memorandum, datedFebruary 17, 2004, from Chris Sanders to John Duckett and Executive regarding incentivecompensation).WITNESSETH:WHEREAS, Lindsay Manufacturing Co., a Delaware corporation (“Lindsay”), is in the process ofacquiring the stock of the Company pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, of even dateherewith (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among the Company, Lindsay, Merger Sub (as defined in theMerger Agreement) and the Shareholder Representative (as defined in the Merger Agreement);WHEREAS, the Executive has been employed by the Company, and the Company and Lindsay wish forExecutive to serve as the President of the Company for the period provided in this Agreement; andWHEREAS, in order to induce Lindsay to enter into the Merger Agreement and in recognition of theconsideration to be received by the Executive in connection with the transactions contemplatedthereby, the Executive is willing to serve in such capacity in the employ of the Company for suchperiod upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and agreementshereinafter set forth, the Company and the Executive agree as follows:**ARTICLE I**
No. 09-9522.

#### William Wilson, Petitioner v. Mississippi.

560 U.S. 909, 130 S. Ct. 3282,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1191,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3966.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.

*1192Same case below, 21 So. 3d 572.
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of XRG,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, each of the
undersigned Kevin Brennan, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Stephen Couture, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigneds' knowledge and
belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  November 15, 2004                   /s/ Kevin Brennan
                                            -----------------------------
                                                Kevin Brennan
                                                Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  November 15, 2004                   /s/ Stephen Couture
                                            -----------------------------
                                                Stephen Couture
                                                Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1** **CERTIFICATION    PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF    2002**     In connection with the quarterly report on    Form 10-Q    of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp. (the    “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2008    (the “Report”) as filed with the Securities and    Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Douglas M.    Libby, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,    certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as    enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act    of 2002, that:      1.         This Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and      2.          The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company.        Dated: May 1, 2008     By: */s/ Douglas M. Libby*
Jennifer STULL, Plaintiff, v. Jared D. STULL, Defendant.

No. COA18-915

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 7, 2019

REMANDED.
No. 09-9022.

#### Chad Everett Johnston, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

559 U.S. 1073, 130 S. Ct. 2101,

176 L. Ed. 2d 732,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3321.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 99.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hopewell Acquisition Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gary Huang, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

   (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
        the Company.


/s/ Gary Huang
---------------
  Gary Huang

August 6, 2003
No. 09-849.

#### The Shipping Corporation of India, Ltd., Petitioner v. Jaldhi Overseas Pte Ltd.

559 U.S. 1030, 130 S. Ct. 1896,

176 L. Ed. 2d 402,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2362.

March 22, 2010.

Motion of Maritime Law Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of *403Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Same case below, 585 F.3d 58.
No. 09-8682.

#### John L. Lotter, Petitioner v. Nebraska.

559 U.S. 1014, 130 S. Ct. 1900,

176 L. Ed. 2d 378,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2732.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nebraska denied.

*379Same case below, 278 Neb. 466, 771 N.W.2d 551.
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION
ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Kris
G. Radhakrishnan, Chief Financial Officer of American Achievement Group Holding
Corp., ACC Group Holding Corp. and American Achievement Corporation (the
“Companies”), hereby certify that:





(1) The
Quarterly Report of the Companies on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31,
2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.





Date:
July 15, 2008





/s/
      KRIS G. RADHAKRISHNANName:
            
            Kris
      G. RadhakrishnanTitle:
            
            Chief
      Financial Officer(principal
      financial officer)
No. 09-8777.

#### Jimmy Lee Nelson, Petitioner v. Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General of Nevada.

559 U.S. 1039, 130 S. Ct. 2066,

176 L. Ed. 2d 419,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2779.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 350 Fed. Appx. 134.
# C_2016417EN.01000501.xml

| 11.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 417/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 417/5

---

EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF VOCATIONAL TRAINING

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2015

(2016/C 417/16)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/about-cedefop/finance-and-budget/annual-accounts

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Roderick Demetrius BLOUNT

No. 131P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 15, 2019

Roderick Demetrius Blount, for Blount, Roderick Demetrius

Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, for the State

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 12th of April 2019 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of April 2019."

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 12th of April 2019 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Wayne County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of April 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th of April 2019 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of April 2019."
September 12, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DANFORD MAINTENANCE SERVICE, INC., Appellant

NO. 14-12-00507-CV V.

THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION,

Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of APPELLEE, signed 

April 16, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the 

record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below 

AFFIRMED.

We order APPELLANT to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# C_2017222EN.01000201.xml

| 11.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8507 — GENUI/Summit/Sycamore/Market Logic Software)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 222/03)

On 3 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8507. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8507. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
No. 09-9423.

#### Patrick Duray Portley-El, Petitioner v. Robert Steinbeck, et al.

559 U.S. 1110, 130 S. Ct. 2414,

176 L. Ed. 2d 930,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3858.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 204.
China Green Energy Industries, Inc.: Exhibit 10.31 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.31

Loan Agreement between Changzhou City Wujin Best Electronic
Cables Co., Ltd., and Wujin ICBC, pursuant to which Wujin ICBC provided a loan
with a total amount of RMB17, 000,000. The loan term is from November 2, 2011 to
October 26, 2012. The annual interest rate carries the benchmark interest rate
published by the People’s Bank of China.
No. 09-8549.

#### John J. Miller, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 960, 130 S. Ct. 1561,

176 L. Ed. 2d 147,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1421.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 340 Fed. Appx. 335.