alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50034 Summary Calendar

VICTOR CARR, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-97-CV-498

-------------------- November 17, 1999 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Victor Carr, Texas prisoner Number 625996, seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal from the districtcourt’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as timebarred. We GRANT COA with regard to the issue whether Carr’s petition was time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Although Carr’s second state habeas application was dismissed by the Texas courts as an abuse of the writ, it was nevertheless properly filed and thus tolled the applicable limitation period.No. 98-50034 -2- Villegas v. Johnson , 184 F.3d 467, 469 (5th Cir. 1999). With the benefit of the resulting toll, Carr’s federal habeas petition was filed within the limitations period established by the AEDPA.
See id. Accordingly, COA is GRANTED, the judgment of the district court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5061 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5061

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey Paint Bank National 
  Fish Hatchery and Wytheville National Fish Hatchery to the State of 
                               Virginia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2006

Mr. Boucher (for himself and Mr. Goode) introduced the following bill; 
            which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey Paint Bank National 
  Fish Hatchery and Wytheville National Fish Hatchery to the State of 
                               Virginia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Paint Bank and Wytheville National 
Fish Hatcheries Conveyance Act''.

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF PAINT BANK AND WYTHEVILLE NATIONAL FISH 
              HATCHERIES TO THE STATE OF VIRGINIA.

    (a) In General.--Within 180 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall convey to the State of 
Virginia without reimbursement all right, title, and interest of the 
United States in and to the property described in subsection (b) for 
use by the Virginia Department of Fish and Game as part of the State of 
Virginia fish culture program.
    (b) Property Described.--The property referred to in subsection (a) 
consists of--
            (1) the real property comprising Paint Bank National Fish 
        Hatchery and Wytheville National Fish Hatchery, located at 
        Paint Bank and Wytheville, Virginia, respectively, as described 
        in the 1982 Cooperative Agreement between the United States 
        Fish and Wildlife Service and the State of Virginia;
            (2) all improvements and related personal property under 
        the control of the Secretary that is located on that real 
        property, including buildings, structures, and equipment; and
            (3) all easements, leases, and water rights relating to the 
        property described in paragraphs (1) and (2).
    (c) Reversionary Interest.--If any of the property conveyed to the 
State of Virginia under this section is used for any purpose other than 
the use authorized under subsection (a), all right, title, and interest 
in and to all property conveyed under this section shall revert to the 
United States. The State of Virginia shall ensure that all property 
reverting to the United States under this subsection is in 
substantially the same or better condition as at the time of transfer 
to the State.
                                 <all>
```
No. 09-9502.

#### Boaz Pleasant-Bey, Petitioner v. Tennessee.

560 U.S. 908, 130 S. Ct. 3281,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1191,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4023.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Tennessee, Western Division, denied.
No. 09-1109.

#### Deborah J. Thomas, Petitioner v. The Walt Disney Company, et al.

560 U.S. 905, 130 S. Ct. 3287,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1185,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4004.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

*1186Same case below, 337 Fed. Appx. 694.
No. 09-856.

#### Angela Montgomery, Petitioner v. Wyeth, fka American Home Products Corporation, et al.

559 U.S. 1031, 130 S. Ct. 1896,

176 L. Ed. 2d 403,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2415.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied. The

Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 580 F.3d 455.
No. 09-1034.

#### Charles M. Frye, Petitioner v. Excelsior College.

559 U.S. 1049, 130 S. Ct. 2354,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3093.

176 L. Ed. 2d 563,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 345 Fed. Appx. 241.
Amendment No. 2 to the
License Agreement for Commercial Use of MySQL® Software
   1. Licensor .
 
 2. Definitions .
 a. Product .
  b. Download Website .
  3. Downloads .
 4. Not GPL Software .
 5. Currency .
 6. Term of Agreement .
  7. Trademarks .




---



##### 



8. Support in Disclaimer .
 9. Remedies .
 10. Licensed Software .
  11. Sourcefire Software.
  Application Name
    
    Functional DescriptionSourcefire Intrusion Prevention
System (IPS)
    
    The combination of signature,
protocol, and anomaly-based
inspection methods to achieve
attack detection and prevention
capability.Sourcefire RNA (Real-time Network
Awareness)
    
    The use of passive network
discovery, behavioral profiling
and integrated vulnerability
management technologiesSourcefire Defense Center
    
    The integration and correlation of
threat information to prioritize
security threats
  12. License & Support Purchase .
 Fees
 (a) distribute up to *** units of the Licensed Software as
part of Products from July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2014;
    
    $
    ***(b) source code internal use license
    
    $
    ***




---



##### 



(c) receive Support (as defined below) from January 1, 2011
through June 30, 2014; and
    
    $
    ***(d) unlimited upgrades of the Products, including without
limitation previously deployed Products, to any subsequent
generally available Licensed Software versions released by
MySQL during the term of this Agreement, no matter the form of
the version number listed by Licensor (i.e., all maintenance
releases and major releases, including version number changes
to either side of the decimal point).
    
    ***
 13. Support Features . http://www.mysql.com/about/legal/lifecycle/
 14. Miscellaneous .
  MySQL Americas, Inc.
    
    
    
    Sourcefire, Inc.Check the applicable box:þ Licensee policy does not require a purchase
order for payment. By signing this Amendment,
Licensee agrees to pay Licensor without issuance
of a purchase order.o Licensee policy requires a purchase order for
payment. Licensee is submitting a purchase order
with this Amendment.By: /s/ Lesley Lloyd Young
    
    
    
    By: /s/ Todd P. HeadleyName: Lesley Lloyd Young
    
    
    
    Name: Todd P. HeadleyTitle: Director, Volume Sales, Sun Software
    
    
    
    Title: CFODate: 7-7-09
    
    
    
    Date: 30 June 2009
No. 09-9256.

#### Jose Israel Hernandez-Morales, aka David Hernandez-Morales, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1025, 130 S. Ct. 1931,

176 L. Ed. 2d 398,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2462.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 354 Fed. Appx. 123.
STATE of North Carolina v. William Burnett LINDSEY

No. 330P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Wyatt B. Orsbon, Assistant Appellant Defender, for Lindsey, William Burnett.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Tracy Nayer, Assistant Attorney General, Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, Scott E. Thomas, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 28th of September 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and *710is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 28th of September 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."
EXHIBIT 32.1














Certification of Chief Executive Officer of ULURU Inc.


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant


to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of ULURU Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of ULURU Inc. does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1.)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2.)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








Date: May 14, 2010

/s/ Renaat Van den HooffRenaat Van den HooffPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
No. 09-1106.

#### Bernard Dolenz, Petitioner v. Nancy Vail, Executrix of the Estate of Dmitri Vail, Deceased.

560 U.S. 905, 130 S. Ct. 3287,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1185,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3951.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, denied.

Same case below, 293 S.W.3d 842.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

HAROLD L. ZUBERS JR.,

Respondent

v.

PENN PHOTOMOUNTS, INC. AND C. 

DAVID MATTHIAS,

Petitioners

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 858 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

HAROLD L. ZUBERS JR.,

Respondent

v.

PENN PHOTOMOUNTS, INC. AND C. 

DAVID MATTHIAS AND ALISON S. 

MATTHIAS,

Petitioners

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 859 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned, Kenneth Hicks, of Argentex Mining Corporation,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Argentex Mining
Corporation for the interim period ended July 31, 2006 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Argentex Mining Corporation

Dated: April 8, 2008

|/s/
      Kenneth Hicks       | 
|----------------------------- | 
|Kenneth Hicks                 | 
|President and Director        | 
|(Principal Executive Officer) | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Argentex Mining
Corporation and will be retained by Argentex Mining Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Print	
    - 
    -    					Published: 20 February 2024				 

 

#### Federal Executive Branch Affirms Roles and Responsibilitiesin U.S. Elections

 

The Federal Executive Branch serves to protect U.S. elections and voters, systems, officials, and workers in various ways. Many of its responsibilities are longstanding, while some are more inspired by the recent threats of foreign election influence and interference. 

 

We are collectively releasing this fact sheet to affirm the Federal Executive Branch’s roles and responsibilities in U.S. elections. While state and local officials are responsible for the administration of elections, Federal departments and agencies provide states with critical assistance in mitigating election security challenges, protect citizens’ rights to vote, and offers access to relevant information. This fact sheet is a formal reference document for state and local jurisdictions and provides links to additional resources for these officials.

 

Download the fact sheet here
No. 09-9147.

#### Michael R. Casey, Petitioner v. Peter Harvey.

559 U.S. 1076, 130 S. Ct. 2109,

176 L. Ed. 2d 737,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3319.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of New Jersey denied.
# C_2017218EN.01001602.xml

| 7.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 218/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 218/16

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8467 — BNP Paribas/Commerz Finanz)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 218/06)

On 29 June 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8467. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8467. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# Reports & Publications 2024

Joomla! - the dynamic portal engine and content management system

- Iran's Hardline Regime in Transition Presents Diversified Challenges for the United States As part of our ongoing transparency efforts to enhance public understanding of the Intelligence Community’s (IC) work and to provide insights on national security issues, ODNI today is releasing this declassified IC assessment dated July 2022.
- 2024 Annual Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community This report reflects the collective insights of the Intelligence Community, which is committed every day to providing the nuanced, independent, and unvarnished intelligence that policymakers, warfighters, and domestic law enforcement personnel need to protect American lives and America's interests anywhere in the world.
- The IC OSINT Strategy 2024-2026 The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) released the Intelligence Community (IC) Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) Strategy for 2024-2026.
- Fact Sheet: Federal Executive Branch Agencies Roles and Responsibilities in United States Elections The Federal Executive Branch serves to protect U.S. elections and voters, systems, officials, and workers in various ways. Many of its responsibilities are longstanding, while some are more inspired by the recent threats of foreign election influence and interference.
No. 09-9405.

#### Derwin Dale Livingston, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, *1189Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

560 U.S. 907, 130 S. Ct. 3278,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1188,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4060.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION Ill 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 

Mr. David K. Paylor 

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality 

629 East Main Street 

Richmond, Virginia 23219 

Dear Director Paylor: 

DEC , ·0 2012 

On July 23, 2012, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the 

Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality 

(V ADEQ). The SIP revision addresses the applicable infrastructure elements specified in section 

110(a)(2)(A) through (M) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) which are necessary to implement, maintain, and 

enforce the 2008 ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) in the Commonwealth of 

Virginia. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is 

reviewing it to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR). 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Ruth Knapp, Office of 

Air Program Planning, at (215) 814-2191, or knapp.ruth@epa.gov. She is the principal contact for this 

rulemaking. 

cc: Michael Dowd, Air Division Director 

Diana Esher, 

A~r Director 

Air Protection Division 

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality 

#., '.J Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free. 

Customer Service Hotline; 1-800-438-2474
J~~jEV srqT

~

s 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

$ ~ e WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

0 

PROS~G~ ~ 

N ov - 1 2010 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Mr. William B. Mackie 

Acting Manager, National TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office 

U.S. Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221-3090 

Dear Mr. Mackie: 

On February 8, 2010, the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) requested, as a Tier 1(Tl) 

change, that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approve four (4) remote-handlcd 

(RH) transuranic (TRU) solid waste containers of Test Reactor Area (TRA) Sludge from Idaho 

National Laboratory (INL). EPA has reviewed the information provided and approves the 

addition of these containers from waste stream ID-RTC-S3000 and, as a result, INL may dispose 

of this waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). This approval also allows future addition 

of waste to this stream with a waste pedigree (radiological and physical contents) similar to the 

waste approved in this letter. Any other additional S3000 waste must be approved by EPA using 

the Tier 1 process. 

The enclosed report (EPA Docket No. A-98-49; II-A4-137) supports EPA's approval 

decision based on the information reviewed. 

If you have any questions regarding this approval, please contact Rajani Joglekar at (202) 

343-9462 or Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343-9422. 

Sincerely, 

C74,, P~ 

Tom Peake, Director 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Enclosure 

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable 9 Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: Electronic Distribution 

Christine Gelles, DOE EM 

Alton Harris, DOE EM 

Ed Ziemianski, CBFO 

Ava Holland, CBFO QA 

J R Stroble, CBFO 

Courtland Fesmire, CBFO 

Martin Navarrete, CBFO QA 

Dennis Miehls, CBFO QA 

D K Ploetz, WTS-CCP 

Mike Sensibaugh, WTS-CCP 

Mark Pearcy, WTS-CCP 

Allison Pangle, CTAC 

Porf Martinez, CTAC 

Steve Zappe, NMED
Exhibit 99-3
------------

         Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                               United States Code
         --------------------------------------------------------------

         The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Amended Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q/A of Exelon Corporation for the quarterly period ended March
31, 2002, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information
contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Exelon Corporation.



Date:  October 30, 2002                     /s/ Ruth Ann M. Gillis
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Ruth Ann M. Gillis
                                            Senior Vice President and Chief
                                             Financial Officer
                                            Exelon Corporation