Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d and is not precedent except under the limited circumstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNITED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 50101 C onfer enc e C al endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t if f

- A pp el l ee
v. M A R IO JO N G A L E , al so kn ow n as Jose M an u elR odri gu ez , D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant
A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or th e W est ernD i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 3 : 0 8
- CR- 1 8 9 6
- ALL
B ef ore K IN G , JO L LY , an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IAM: * M ari o Jon G al e ap pea l s t h e 70-m on t h t erm of i m pri sonm en ti m posedf or h i s gu i l t y pl e a c o nvic t i o n f o ra t t e m pt i ng t o e nt e ri nt o t he U ni t e d St at e s a f t er hav i ng pr e vi o us ly be e n r e m o ve d. H e ar gue s t hathi s se nt e nc e , w hi c h was a tt he bott om of

t h e adv i sory gui del i n es r an ge, is u n reasona bl e becau se itw as greater th a n n e ce ss a ryto a ch iev e th e se n te n cin gg o a ls se t for th in 1 8 U .S .C
. § 3 5 5 3 (a). G al e c o nt e nds t hatas ho r t e rs e nt e nc e w as a ppr o pr i at e in h i s cas e b e c aus e he w as rai sed i n t h e U n i t ed S t ates, he w as abu sed by hi s f ost er father i n t h e U n i t ed

United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I LE D December

15, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 09- 50101

2 St at es , and t he aggr avat ed as sa ul t t hat w ar r ant ed t he 16- l eve ladj ust m entw as com m i t t ed a g a in st h is f ost er father i n ret ribu t i on f or years of

abu se. H e al so argu es th at fas t-tra ck program s c reat e un w arran t ed sen t en ci n g di spari t i es be t w e e n de fe nda nt s w ho c an av ailt he m se lve s o f afas t
- t r ac k p r o gr am a nd d e fe n d a n ts , l ik e h im , w h o ca n n o t. A s h e co n c e d e s , h is fa s t-t r a c ka r g u m e n t is fo r e c lo s e db yth is co u r t’s p r e c e d e n t. S ee Un i t ed S t ate s v. G om ez- Herrera , 523 F .3 d5 5 4 , 5 6 3 (5 th C ir .), cer t . den i ed , 1 2 9 S
. C t. 6 2 4 (20 0 8 ). R el yi ng o n Ki m brough v. Un i t ed S t ate s , 5 5 2 U. S
. 8 5 , 1 0 9
- 1 0 ( 2 0 0 7 ) , a nd R i t a v. Un i t ed S t ate s , 5 51 U
. S. 3 38 , 3 47
- 48( 20 07 ) , G al e c o nt e nds t hatt he ap pe l l at e pr e s um pt i o n o f r e as o nab l e ne s s ac c o r de d s e nt e nc e s i m po s e d w i t hi n a defenda n t ’ s properly cal cul ated adv i sory s en t en ci n g gu i del i n es r an ge shou l d n ot ap pl y t o se n ten ces t h at w ere c al cul ated un der G u i del i n es not derivedf rom em pi ri caldata an d nati on al exp eri en ce. H ow ever, as G al e concedes, t h i s c ou rt h a s reje c te dth a t a r g u m e n t. Un itedS ta tes v. D u a rte , 56 9 F
. 3 d52 8 , 52 9 -31 ( 5 th C ir .), cer t . den i ed , 1 3 0 S
. C t. 3 7 8 ( 2 0 0 9 ); Uni t e d S t at e sv. Mondrago n- Sa nt i ago , 5 6 4 F .3 d3 5 7 , 3 6 6 -6 7 (5 th C ir .), cer t . den i ed , 1 3 0 S
. C t. 19 2 ( 2 0 0 9 ). T h e a p p ell a te p r e s u m p tio n o f r e a s o n a b le n e s s is a p p lic a b le inth is ca s e . SeeUni t e d S t at e sv. A lon zo , 4 3 5 F .3d5 5 1 , 5 5 4 (5t h C ir. 2 0 0 6 ). I n de t e r m i ni ng G al e ’ s s e nt e nc e , t he di s t r i ctc o ur tj udg e c o ns i de r e d the ad vi sory s en t en ci n g gu i del i n es r an ge, t h e i n f orm ati o n in G al e’ s presentence r e po r t , a nd the § 355 3( a) fac t o r s . The di s t r i c tc o ur tj udg e c o ns i de r e d the argu m en t s presented at sentenci n g an d det erm i n ed th at a w ith i n - gu i del i n es sentence w as app ropri ate. G al e’ s argum en t s do not es t abli sh that th e di st ri ct c o u r t p la in lye r r e do ra b u s e dits d is c r e tio n inim p o s in g h is s e n te n c e . S eeG a ll v. Un i t ed S t ate s , 552 U
. S
. 38, 51 ( 200 7)
. G al e ha s n ot rebu t t ed the presum pti on o f r e a s o n a b le n e s s th a t a tt a c h e s to h is w ith in -g u id e lin e s s e n te n c e . S ee A lon zo , 435 F. 3d at554. T h e j u d g me n to f

t h e d i s t r i c tc o u r ti s A F F I RMED.