alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



I, Anthony E. Applebaum, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;



2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.  The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.  The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and



6.  The Company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:   February 14, 2008

|                                           | 
|------------------------------------------ | 
|                                           | 
|/s/ Anthony E. Applebaum                   | 
|Anthony E. Applebaum                       | 
|Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
China Green Energy Industries, Inc.: Exhibit 10.27 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.27

Loan Agreement between Changzhou City Wujin Best Electronic
Cables Co., Ltd., and Wujin Agriculture Bank, pursuant to which Wujin
Agriculture Bank provided a loan with a total amount of RMB3, 000,000 . The loan
term is from August 26, 2011 to June 25, 2012. The annual interest rate carries
a floating interest rate which is 110% of the benchmark interest rate published
by the People's Bank of China.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Thrift Supervision

          - [AC-29: OTS No. 06571]

                    Notice is hereby given that on January 29, 2009, the Office of Thrift Supervision approved the application of Canisteo Savings and Loan Association, Canisteo, New York, to convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application are available for inspection by appointment (phone number: (202) 906-5922 or e-mail:                     *Public.Info@OTS.Treas.gov*) at the Public Reading Room, 1700 U Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, and the OTS Northeast Regional Office, Harborside Financial Center Plaza Five, Suite 1600, Jersey City, New Jersey 07311.                

Dated: March 4, 2009.

By the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Sandra E. Evans,

Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. E9-5106 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 1086** 

I n R e : BERNARD MCFADDEN, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

. ( 5:13

- cv - 02290

- JMC )

Submitted : April 23 , 2015 Decided: April 28, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Bernard McFadden , Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Bernard McFadden petitions for a writ o f mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to issue an order compelling discovery or an injunction. We conclude that McFadden is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary ci rcumstances. Kerr v. U
. S
. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976) ; United States v. Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003) . Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass ’ n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988)
. The relief sought by McFadden is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ad equately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. PETITION DENIED
No. 09-9246.

#### Kristofer Thomas Kastner, Petitioner v. Martin, Drought & Torres, et al.

559 U.S. 1053, 130 S. Ct. 2353,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3018.

176 L. Ed. 2d 570,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, denied.
No. 09-9331.

#### Carlvosier Smith, Petitioner v. Illinois.

559 U.S. 1097, 130 S. Ct. 2382,

176 L. Ed. 2d 776,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3618.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 234 Ill. 2d 546, 336 Ill. Dec. 489, 920 N.E.2d 1079.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
 (Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Patrick Freeman, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of CORDIACORPORATION;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
           necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with

respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
            material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
            this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
            defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have;

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
                 consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
                 annual report is being prepared;

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
                  filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c)  Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
                  our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
            audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
                 ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors, any material
                 weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
                  internal controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in
            internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
            evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 29, 2005

/s/ Patrick Freeman

-------------------------------------                 President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 09-9922.

#### Moshoodi Emiola Ajijola, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1113, 130 S. Ct. 2421,

176 L. Ed. 2d 935,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3768.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 584 F.3d 763.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in

5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50592 Summary Calendar

MARY E. VELA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

F. WHITTEN PETERS, Secretary of the Department of the Air Force, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

SA-99-CV-850

February 15, 2002 Before POLITZ, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Mary E. Vela appeals the dismissal, alternatively, adverse summary judgment,2

of her claims against the Secretary of the Department of the Air Force for alleged

discrimination on the basis of national origin, gender and age, and hostile environment

and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§

2000e et seq. Having reviewed the record, briefs of the parties and dispositive law, and

on the facts as found, authorities cited, and analysis made by the Magistrate Judge in

her careful and thorough Memorandum Decision and Order entered and filed on May

23, 2001, the judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      In connection with the accompanying Quarter Report on Form 10-Q of the
      Company for the three months ended June 30, 2005, I, Andrew J. Ryback,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

            1)    such Quarter Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three
                  months ended June 30, 2005, fully complies with the
                  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2)    the information contained in such Quarter Report on Form 10-Q
                  of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2005,
                  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
                  condition and results of operations of Plumas Bancorp.

Date: August 11, 2005                   /s/ Andrew Ryback
                                      ------------------------------------
                                      Andrew J. Ryback, Chief Financial Officer
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

37 38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/04 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 04 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
No. 09-728.

#### Jon A. Jensen, et ux., Petitioners v. Paul A. Stoot, Sr., et al.

559 U.S. 1057, 130 S. Ct. 2343,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3013.

176 L. Ed. 2d 577,

April 5, 2010.

Motion of National Association of Police Organizations, Inc. for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of City of Escondido for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 582 F.3d 910.
No. 09-9490.

#### Myracle Martynowicz, Petitioner v. Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services.

560 U.S. 908, 130 S. Ct. 3313,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1190,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3937.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kansas denied.

Same case below, 201 P.3d 1.
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the quarterly report of West Bancorporation, Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David R. Milligan,
Interim Chief Executive Officer of West Bancorporation, Inc., certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) The report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of West
Bancorporation, Inc.





October
29, 2009








/s/ David R.
Milligan


David R.
Milligan


Interim
Chief Executive Officer






50
No. 09M92.

#### Gerard D. Grandoit, Petitioner v. Michael J. Bane, et al.

559 U.S. 1104, 130 S. Ct. 2427,

176 L. Ed. 2d 921,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3716.

May 3, 2010.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
In the MATTER OF Christi Anne MISOCKY, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2019-000310

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

March 1, 2019

ORDER

Respondent was administratively suspended for failing to pay her license fees and failing to comply with her CLE requirements on February 26, 2018 and April 18, 2018, respectively. On February 15, 2019, respondent was arrested and charged with two counts of forgery, value $10,000 or more. Based on her arrest and her failure to cooperate with an Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) investigation, ODC asks this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rules 17(a) and (c), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent's license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of this Court.

*/s/ Donald W. Beatty, C.J.*

FOR THE COURT
Third Amendment to Executive Deferred Compenstion Plan



 Exhibit 10.35 
 THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION 
 EXECUTIVE DEFERRED
COMPENSATION PLAN 
 (2003 Amendment and Restatement) 

WHEREAS, The Progressive Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan is currently maintained pursuant to a 2003 Amendment and
Restatement and the First and Second Amendments thereto (“Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, it is deemed desirable to
amend the Plan further; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended in the respects hereinafter set forth: 

 

	1.	Effective March 17, 2005, Section 4.2 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to provide as follows: 


“4.2 Investment of Accounts. 
 All credits to a Deferral Account of a Participant shall be deemed to be invested in such Investment Fund or Funds as the Participant shall elect from time to time in accordance with Article 5. The number
of shares of Stock to be credited to a Participant’s Account by virtue of a Participant’s initial election to invest a portion of a Deferral in the Company Stock Fund shall be determined on the date of the Deferral in accordance with such
procedures as the Committee shall establish, based on the weighted average price paid for all shares of Stock purchased by the Trustee and deposited in the Trust on that date pursuant to Article 6. Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this
Section 4.2, (i) all credits to a Deferral Account of a Participant relating to a deferred Restricted Stock Award granted prior to March 17, 2005, shall be deemed to be invested in the Company Stock Fund until six (6) months and
one (1) day following the expiration of the restrictions applicable to such Award, unless otherwise determined by the Committee at or after the deferral of such Award, and, thereafter, the preceding provisions of this Section 4.2 shall
apply, and (ii) all credits to a Deferral Account of a Participant relating to a deferred Restricted Stock Award granted on or after March 17, 2005, shall be deemed to be invested in the Company Stock Fund until the balance of such
Deferral Account has been distributed or withdrawn in accordance with Article 3.” 
  

	2.	Effective March 17, 2005, the following is hereby added to the end of Section 5.4 of the Plan: 


“Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this Section 5.4, each Deferral of a Restricted Stock Award granted on or after
March 17, 2005 shall be deemed to be invested in the Company Stock Fund until the Deferral Account to which such Deferral has been credited has been distributed or withdrawn in accordance with Article 3 of this Plan.” 

 

	3.	Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, the terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain entirely unchanged and continue in full force and effect.


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly
authorized representative effective as of the date set forth above. 
  

			
	THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ Charles E. Jarrett
	Title:	 	Vice President & Secretary
STATE of North Carolina v. Aggrey Winston MANNING

No. 121P15-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2019

Aggrey W. Manning, for Manning, Aggrey W.

Amy Kunstling Irene, Special Deputy Attorney General, Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 7th of January 2019 in this *23matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."

Ervin, J. and Davis J. recused
Le RMAH, Plaintiff, v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and Maureen Mihans, Defendants.

No. COA18-623

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 26, 2019

AFFIRMED IN PART. REVERSED IN PART. REMANDED.
H. R. 5224

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and six 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 350 Uinta 

Drive in Green River, Wyoming, as the ‘‘Curt Gowdy Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CURT GOWDY POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 350 Uinta Drive in Green River, Wyoming, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Curt Gowdy Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Curt Gowdy Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IPC Acquisition Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Lance Boxer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | By: /s/ Lance Boxer    
| |  |                        
| |  | Lance Boxer            
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  | February 13, 2004
No. 09-1032.

#### TeleCheck Services, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Cheryl Beaudry.

559 U.S. 1092, 130 S. Ct. 2379,

176 L. Ed. 2d 768,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3561.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 579 F.3d 702.
In the MATTER OF: S.H.J.

No. COA18-655

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 16, 2019

AFFIRMED.