alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of XRG, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB (the "Report") for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Stephen Couture, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Stephen Couture
-------------------------
Stephen Couture
Chief Financial Officer
February 19, 2004
No. 09-9131.

#### John M. Wyatt, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1023, 130 S. Ct. 1925,

176 L. Ed. 2d 394,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2448,

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 574 F.3d 455.
STATE v. Jeffery Martaez SIMPKINS

188A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 2, 2019

Kimberly P. Hoppin, Attorney at Law, for Simpkins, Jeffery Martaez Leroy.

Daniel O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Alexandra M. Hightower, Assistant Attorney General, T. Lynn Clodfelter, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 2nd of July 2019 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd of July 2019."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 26th day of July 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

SEP 3 1999

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

TOMI EDWARD JENNINGS, JR.,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

STATE OF WYOMING; WYOMING

ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondents-Appellees.

No. 99-8024

(D.C. No. 97-CV-210)

(D. Wyo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before BRORBY , EBEL , and HENRY , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination

of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

This appeal arises from the district court’s dismissal of petitioner’s petition

for writ of habeas corpus as time-barred. The Antiterrorism and Effective Death

Penalty Act (AEDPA) amended the habeas corpus statute and established a

one-year limitation period to file habeas petitions. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). 

Because the judgment on petitioner’s conviction was final before the effective

date of AEDPA, he had until April 24, 1997 to file a petition for habeas relief. 

See Hoggro v. Boone , 150 F.3d 1223, 1225-26 (10th Cir. 1998). Petitioner’s first

habeas petition was filed before that date, but the district court dismissed it on

February 27, 1997, because petitioner had not exhausted his state remedies and he

failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

The district court was obligated to dismiss the first petition because

exhaustion of state remedies is a prerequisite to federal habeas relief. See 28

U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A). Had petitioner requested post-conviction relief in state

court pursuant to Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 7-14-101 through 108 (1999), the one-year

limitation period would have been tolled while he had a properly filed application

for state post-conviction relief pending in the state court. See Barnett v.

Lemaster , 167 F.3d 1321, 1322-23 (10th Cir. 1999). He did not, however, avail

himself of those remedies. Consequently, when petitioner filed his second request

for habeas relief on August 25, 1997, the one-year limitation period had long

since expired. We agree with the district court that the habeas petition is time-
-3-

barred, and we must DISMISS the appeal. The application for a certificate of

appealability is DENIED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Robert H. Henry

Circuit Judge
No. 09-8882.

#### Troy W. Dalton, Petitioner v. Gene M. Johnson, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

559 U.S. 1050, 130 S. Ct. 2344,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2931.

176 L. Ed. 2d 565,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 353 Fed. Appx. 860.
No. 09-9372.

#### J. Lamont Lindsey, Petitioner v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation.

559 U.S. 1054, 130 S. Ct. 2357,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2972,

176 L. Ed. 2d 571,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
No. 09-1046.

#### Corey Hoover, Petitioner v. Ohio.

559 U.S. 1093, 130 S. Ct. 2380,

176 L. Ed. 2d 768,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3542.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to Supreme Court of Ohio denied.

Same case below, 123 Ohio St. 3d 418, 916 N.E.2d 1056.
No. 09-9462.

#### Andre De Leon-Quinones, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1056, 130 S. Ct. 2361,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3091.

176 L. Ed. 2d 575,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 588 F.3d 748.
| (1)   | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Delta Oil & Gas, Inc. for the                quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the                quarter ended September 30, 2006, fairly presents in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Delta                Oil                & Gas, Inc.. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/                Douglas Bolen                                                             |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Douglas                Bolen                                                                       |
|  Title:    |  Principal                Executive Officer,Principal                Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  November                20, 2006                                                                   |
<PAGE>   1


                                                                EXHIBIT 10(d)(2)


                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
              SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN FOR EXECUTIVES
            OF KOGER EQUITY, INC. AND PARTICIPATING RELATED ENTITIES


     In accordance with Article 8 of the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
for Executives of Koger Equity, Inc. and Participating Related Entities (the
"SERP"), the following amendments are hereby adopted by the Board of Directors
of Koger Equity, Inc. and Participating Related Entities, effective June 21,
1996:

     a.   Section 2.15 of the SERP is hereby amended to read as follows:

               "`Social Security Benefit' means the annual amount of Old Age
          Insurance Benefit payable to the Participant commencing at retirement,
          as calculated at the time of his or her retirement under the
          provisions of the Social Security Act then in effect and determined
          without regard to any reduction of such Benefit on account of `excess
          earnings.'"

     b.   Schedule B of the SERP is hereby amended to add James C. Teagle to
          that Schedule.

     c.   Schedule C of the SERP is hereby amended to delete James C. Teagle
          from that Schedule.

     d.   Schedule C of the SERP is hereby amended to add Kenneth D. Lund to
          that Schedule.



                                             KOGER EQUITY, INC.



                                             By: [W. Lawrence Jenkins]
                                                 -------------------------
                                                 Corporate Secretary


June 21, 1996
## P\RTMEMTO F :'lS''ORTATiO H ^ •q-OPFRATlOw S

i j O 

# pciq «

A RI ZON A TH E CENTE R O F CANYO N COtftCTR Y Januar y 27-201 1 Denni s J . DeVany . Chie f Essentia l Ai r

Servic e Division . X-5 3 Roo mW86-30 8 Offic e o f Aviatio nAnalysi s Departmen t

o f Transportatio n ! 20 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue . S E Washington . D C 2059 0 Re : Communit y Recommendation s o n Proposal s l o Provid e HA S at Page . Arizon a (Orde r 2010-1 1 - 1 7/Docke t

OST-1997-2694 ) Attention : Michae l Marti n Dear Mr . DeVany : Th e Cit y o f

Pag e ha s receive dan dreviewe dyou r lette r o f Januar y 7 . 20 1 I . regardin g th e abov e Order/Docket . Afte r

du e consideraiio n b y ou r Cit y Counci l a

t it s Januar y 27 , 20 1 1 meeting , th e City Counci l unanimousl y recommend s tha t USDO T awar dth e EA S Contrac t t o Grea t Lake s Aviation . Ltd. . Optio n 1 . Grea l Lake s Aviatio nhas . ove r th e pas t fe w years , serve dtw o majo r hub s fro mPag e {Phoeni x an dDenver) , whereb y passenger s ma y connec t wit hcod e shar e partner s t o destination s serve d withi n thei r

rout e structures . Grea l Lake s als o maintain s interlin e ticke t an dbaggag e agreement s withth e majority o f

othe r carrier s servin g Phoeni x an dDenver , includin g Unite dAirlines . Frontie r Airlines , an dno w U.S . Airway s an dContinenta l Airlines . Thes e addition s hav e greatl y enhance dservice s for

passenger s no t

onl y a t Phoenix , bu t

als o at Denve r (whic hha s increase d ridershi p to/fro mDenver) . Accordingly , th e Denve r connectio n i s growing , an dwoul dcertainl y nee dt o b e maintained . However , ther e remain s an unserve dmarke t to/fro mth e La s Vega s hub . Withou t sacrificin g th e Phoeni x an dDenve r

connections , w e woul dslrongl ) recommen dtha t Grea l Lake s continu e t o pursu e an dimplemen t

aLa s Vega s servic e a s quickl y a s possible . O n anothe r

concern , ove r

th e pas t severa l months , ther e ha s bee n adeclin e in dependabl e servic e (lat e o r cancelle dflights), causin g passenge r leakag e fro mdri \in g t o ahub . an dinconvenience s wit hmisse ddestinatio nconnection s a t th e hub . Passenge r

suppor t ha s decline dan dcomplaint s

Cit yo f Pag e PO . Bo x118 0 • 69 7 Vist

a Avenu e Page , Arizon a 8604 0 (928 ) 645-886 1 • Fa

x(928 ) 645-424 4hav e increased . Whil e ther e wer e severa l reason s fo r thes e servic e issues , o f whic hmos t

ma y b e addresse dwiththi s proposal , w e strongl y sugges t that Grea t Lake s Aviatio n continu e t o addres s servic e issue s i

n orde r t o provid e mor e dependabl e custome r service , resultin g in increase d ridership . Than k yo u for thi s opportunit y t o revie w an dcommen t o n thi s proposal . W e loo k forwar dt o a seamles s servic e for

Page .

Lyl e Dimbatt . Mayo r Cit y o f Pag e cc : Michae l O . Matthew s Grea t Lake s Aviation . Ltd .
STATE v. Flint Fitzgerald JOHNSON, Jr.

382P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Flint Fitzgerald Johnson, Jr., for Johnson, Flint Fitzgerald (Jr.).

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 31st of October 2018 by Defendant for Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."

Ervin, J. recused
No. 09-9135.

#### Jose Mercede, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1032, 130 S. Ct. 1925,

176 L. Ed. 2d 404,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2494.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 354 Fed. Appx. 477.
No. 09-8213.

#### Stephen D. Thibeau, Petitioner v. Massachusetts.

559 U.S. 978, 130 S. Ct. 1700,

176 L. Ed. 2d 191,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2006,

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

WRITTEN STATEMENT 

PURSUANT TO 

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350 

 

The undersigned, James V.Mazzo, the Chief Executive Officer of Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certifies to the best of his knowledge that: 

 

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarterly period ended March 28, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and 

 

(ii) the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: May 1, 2003 

 

/s/    JAMES V. MAZZO                    

James V. Mazzo, 

President and Chief Executive Officer 

 

**A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. and will be retained by Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.**
No. 09-10001.

#### Derrick D. Blackmon, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1115, 130 S. Ct. 2417,

176 L. Ed. 2d 940,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3741.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 584 F.3d 1115.
STATE of North Carolina v. Eric Michael JORDAN

No. COA18-875

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 7, 2019

NO ERROR IN PART. NO PLAIN ERROR IN PART.
No. 09-9335.

#### Gene Polk, Petitioner v. Fred Menifee, Warden.

559 U.S. 1044, 130 S. Ct. 2082,

176 L. Ed. 2d 428,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2902.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cirracor, Inc. a Nevada corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Reed Fisher, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Cirracor, Inc., and will be retained by Cirracor, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/ Reed Fisher
--------------------------
Reed Fisher
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
August 20, 2004
No. 09-702.

#### Acushnet Company, Petitioner v. Callaway Golf Company.

559 U.S. 939, 130 S. Ct. 1525,

176 L. Ed. 2d 114,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1483.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 576 F.3d 1331.
STATE v. Michael Wayne SHERRILL

246A09-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 26, 2019

M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., Attorney at Law, John F. Carella, Staff Attorney, Amanda S. Zimmer, Assistant Appellate Defender, Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, for Sherrill, Michael Wayne.

Clayton Jones, Assistant District Attorney, Amy Kunstling Irene, Special Deputy Attorney General, Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Constance E. Widenhouse, Assistant Appellate Defender.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of April 2019 by State of NC for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion for Appropriate Relief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of April 2019."

State of NC shall have up to and including 31 May 2019 to Respond to Motion for Appropriate Relief.
No. 09-9916.

#### Jose Roberto Garcia-Limones, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1113, 130 S. Ct. 2421,

176 L. Ed. 2d 935,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3856.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
A People of Vision 

FLAT}IEAD 

SALISH 

THE CONFEDERATED SALISH AND KOOTENAI TRIBES 

OF THE FLATHEAD NATION 

NAI P.O. BOX 278 

Pablo, Montana 59855 ~ 

(406) 275-27dIECEIVEQ 

FAX (406) 275-2806 

www.cskt.orfB 212012 

A Confederation of the Salish, 

Upper Pend d'Oreilles 

and Kootenai Tribes 

Sadie Hoskie, Director 

EPA Region 8. Water Program 

1595 Wynkoop Street 

Denver. CO 80202-1129 

February 7, 2012 

TRIBAL COUNCIL MEMBERS: 

E.T. "Bud" Moran — Chaimian 

Joe Durglo — Vice Chair 

Steve Lozar — Secretary 

Jim Malatare — Treasurer 

Michel Kenmille 

Carole Lankford 

Reuben A. Mathias 

Charles L. Morigeau 

Terry L. Pitts 

James Steele Jr. 

RE: Request for Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification for Vessel General Permits 

(VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) 

Dear Ms. Hoskie, 

The Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes Natural Resource Department staff has 

received and reviewed the Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General Permit for 

Discharges Incidental to the Normal Operation of Commercial Vessels and Large 

Recreational Vessels (VGP), as well as Small Commercial Vessels. 

The Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes Natural Resource Department understands 

that the sVGP is only applicable to commercial vessels and that all recreational vessels 

are covered under the Clean Boating Act. In addition, the VGP generally covers 

commercial vessels and large recreational vessels, but some vessels such as tour boats 

may fall into a gray area between small commercial and small recreational vessels, in 

which, determination will need to be based on the use of the vessel, number of paying 

passengers and whether or not the coast guard inspects the vessel. 

Taking into consideration the guidance and regulations of the Vessel General Permit and 

Small Vessel General Permit, The Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes Natural 

Resource Department agrees to grant 401 Certification for Vessel General Permits (VGP) 

and Small Vessel General Permits (sVGP). 

Sincerel-Y, ~! J 

~--.' 

.~" 

:"- 

'ch 

Natural Resources Department Head
# C_2017220EN.01005301.xml

| 8.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/53

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8242 — Rolls-Royce/ITP)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 220/04)

On 19 April 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8242. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8242. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 500 

To preserve and protect the free choice of individual employees to form, 

join, or assist labor organizations, or to refrain from such activities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2005 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina (for himself, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, Mr. WICKER, 

Mr. PAUL, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. GOODE, Mr. 

BEAUPREZ, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. LINDER, Mr. DUNCAN, 

Mr. POE, Mr. WELDON of Florida, Mr. MCHENRY, Mr. GARRETT of New 

Jersey, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. TANCREDO, Mr. RYUN of Kansas, Mr. ISSA, 

and Mr. KOLBE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To preserve and protect the free choice of individual employees to form, join, or assist labor organizations, or to 

refrain from such activities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Right-to5 Work Act’’. 
2 

•HR 500 IH 

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE NATIONAL LABOR RELA2 TIONS ACT. 

3 (a) Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act 

4 (the ‘‘Act’’) (29 U.S.C. 157) is amended by striking ‘‘ex5 cept to’’ and all that follows through ‘‘authorized in sec6 tion 8(a)(3)’’. 

7 (b) Section 8(a) of the Act (29 U.S.C. 158(a)) is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘: Provided, That’’ and all that fol9 lows through ‘‘retaining membership’’ in paragraph (3). 

10 (c) Section 8(b) of the Act (29 U.S.C. 158(b)) is 

11 amended by striking ‘‘or to discriminate’’ and all that fol12 lows through ‘‘retaining membership’’ in paragraph (2) 

13 and by striking ‘‘covered by an agreement authorized 

14 under subsection (a)(3) of this section’’ in paragraph (5). 

15 (d) Section 8(f) of the Act (29 U.S.C. 158(f)) is 

16 amended by striking clause (2) and by redesignating 

17 clauses (3) and (4) as (2) and (3), respectively. 

18 SEC. 3. AMENDMENT TO THE RAILWAY LABOR ACT. 

19 Section 2 of the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 152) 

20 is amended by striking paragraph Eleventh. 

Æ