alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 09-954.

#### Isidoro Rodriguez, Petitioner v. Virginia Employment Commission.

559 U.S. 1008, 130 S. Ct. 1915,

176 L. Ed. 2d 368,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2608.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 25, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00176

- CR

Steve MENDIOLA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR0624

Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Appellant ’ s Motion for Ex tension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. The

appellant ’ s brief is deemed filed.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of October, 2018

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court
No. 09-1007.

#### Mountain America, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Donna Huffman, Assessor of Monroe County, West Virginia, et al.

559 U.S. 1102, 130 S. Ct. 2377,

176 L. Ed. 2d 785,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3565.

April 26, 2010.

Motion of West Virginia Manufacturers Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denied.

Same case below, 224 W. Va. 669, 687 S.E.2d 768.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on February 9, 2009, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers  (“IEEE”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, 34 new standards have been initiated and 9 existing standards are being revised. More detail regarding these changes can be found at                     *http://standards.ieee.org/​standardswire/​sba/​12-10-08.html*                     and                     *http://standards.ieee.org/​standardswire/​sba/​01-30-09.html*.                

                    On September 17, 2004, IEEE filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 64105).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 17, 2008. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on December 11, 2008 (73 FR 75469).                

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

 [FR Doc. E9-4853 Filed 3-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Biscuit Mix 

Yellow Cake Mix 

Chocolate Frosting Mix 

Peaches 

ACR-MC-01 

16 September 2014 

W/Change 01 19 Jun 17 ES17-043 (DSCP-SS-17-01001) 

SUPERSEDING 

ACR-B-0lB 

27 February 2012 

Can or box, 5 lb 1 

Can or box, 5 lb 1 

Can or box, 5 lb 1 

No. 10 can 2 

UGR- M LUNCH/DINNER MENU 14 

Component 

Chicken 

White Beans 

Onions, Dehydrated, Chopped 

J alapefio Peppers 

Salsa, Chunky 

Rice 

Southwest Seasoning 

Green Beans 

Butter Granules 

Cornbread Mix 

Brownie Mix 

Pears 

Vanilla Pudding 

Unit of Issue 

No. 3 cyl can 48 oz 

No. 10 can 

1.62 oz bottle 

4 oz can 

64 oz plastic bottle 

5 lb bag 

4.6 oz bag 

No. 10 can 

57 g package 

Can or box, 5 lb 

Can or box, 5 lb 

No. 10 can 

No. 10 can 

Quantity 

4 

4 

2 

2 

3 

1 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

22
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1483** 

KISHA MARIE DAVIS , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Physicians MUSC

- P , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston
. Mary Gordon Baker, Magistrate Judge. ( 2:14

- cv - 03152

- MGB )

Submitted : September 13, 2016 Decided: September 16, 2016

Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Kisha Marie Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Andreas Neal Satterfield, Jr., John Su lau, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kisha Marie Davis appeals the magistrate judge’s * order granting Medical University of South Carolina summary judgment on her claims, brought pursuant to the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601

- 2654 (2012) , the Ame ricans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101

- 12 21 3 (2012) , the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2016 ) , and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e

- 17 (2012) . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Davis’ application to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge
. See Davis v. Med. Univ. of S
. C
. , No. 2:14

- cv - 03152

- MGB (D. S. C. Mar. 30 , 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

* The parties consented to the magistrate judge ’s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) ( 2012 ).
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4997 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4997

    To permanently authorize amendments made by the Immigration and 
   Nationality Technical Corrections Act of 1994 for the purpose of 
 permitting waivers of the foreign country residence requirement with 
          respect to certain international medical graduates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2006

   Mr. Moran of Kansas (for himself and Mr. Pomeroy) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To permanently authorize amendments made by the Immigration and 
   Nationality Technical Corrections Act of 1994 for the purpose of 
 permitting waivers of the foreign country residence requirement with 
          respect to certain international medical graduates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Physicians for Underserved Areas 
Act''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF FOREIGN COUNTRY RESIDENCE REQUIREMENT WITH RESPECT TO 
              INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL GRADUATES.

    Section 220(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Technical 
Corrections Act of 1994 (8 U.S.C. 1182 note; Public Law 103-416) (as 
amended by section 1(a)(1) of Public Law 108-441) is amended by 
striking ``Act and before June 1, 2006.'' and inserting ``Act.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Eon Labs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William F. Holt, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 

|              |                     |
|-------------------|--------------------------|
|              | /s/                      | William  F. Holt |   |
|              | William  F. Holt         |
|              | Chief  Financial Officer |
| November 13, 2003 |                     |

 

 

 

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp., (the“Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mary Jane Robertson, Executive Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asenacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated:  May 3, 2007 By:  /s/  *Mary Jane Robertson*    Mary Jane Robertson    Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission, or its staff, upon request.
No. 09-8833.

#### William Eric Brown, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1108, 130 S. Ct. 2403,

176 L. Ed. 2d 926,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3765.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 586 F.3d 1342.
**Exhibit 31.2**     **CERTIFICATION**I, Todd P. Headley, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Sourcefire, Inc. for the period ended June 30,2007;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:      August 3, 2007 By:  /s/ Todd P. Headley       Name:  Todd P. Headley   Title:  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Order entered August 1, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 01511
- CR LUIS ARMANDO QUIROZ, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 10

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MA
- 1470927
- L



### O RDER Appellant’s brief was due March 8, 2017. By postcard dated March 9, 2017, we informed appellant his brief was past due and directed him to file his brief within ten day s along with a motion to extend time. When appellant did not respond, w e abated the appeal for a hearing. Appellant then filed a motion to extend time to file his brief and, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we vacated our prior order and extend e d the time for filing appellant’s
brief until May 18, 2017. When no brief was filed , we ordered retained counsel Samuel Beale to file app ellant’s brief by July 14, 2017, and cautioned counsel that the failure to file a brief by the deadline would result i n this Court abating the case for a hearing. To date, no brief has been filed and Mr. Beale has failed to communicate with the Court regarding this appeal.Therefore, the Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why

appellant’s brie f has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has aban doned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no p et.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proce edings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Roberto Canas Jr., Presiding Judge, County Criminal Court No. 10 ; to Samuel Beale; and to the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received , whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jean M. Belot, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 890]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated April 5, 1999 *(People v Belot,*260 AD2d 388), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered July 9, 1996.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Bracken, Acting P. J., Ritter, Krausman and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
               18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED AND PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the quarterly report of American Achievement Corporation
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending February 23, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sherice
P. Bench, Chief Financial Officer of American Achievement Corporation, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American
       Achievement Corporation;

    (2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
       statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
       to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
       such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
       covered by this quarterly report;

    (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
       information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
       material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
       flows of American Achievement Corporation as of, and for, the periods
       presented in this quarterly report.

<Table>
<S>                                                    <C>  <C>
Dated: September 10, 2002                                              /s/ SHERICE P. BENCH
                                                            -----------------------------------------
                                                                         Sherice P. Bench
                                                                     CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
</Table>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5191 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5191

 To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to direct the Secretary of 
 Homeland Security to require, as a condition of receiving a homeland 
     security grant, that a grant recipient submit reports on each 
                  expenditure made using grant funds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2006

  Mr. Weiner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to direct the Secretary of 
 Homeland Security to require, as a condition of receiving a homeland 
     security grant, that a grant recipient submit reports on each 
                  expenditure made using grant funds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homeland Security Transparency Act 
of 2006''.

SEC. 2. EXPENDITURE REPORTS AS A CONDITION OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRANTS.

    (a) In General.--Subtitle H of title VIII of the Homeland Security 
Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 451 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new section:

``SEC. 890A. EXPENDITURE REPORTS AS A CONDITION OF HOMELAND SECURITY 
              GRANTS.

    ``(a) Quarterly Reports Required as a Condition of Homeland 
Security Grants.--
            ``(1) Expenditure reports required.--As a condition of 
        receiving a grant administered by the Secretary, the Secretary 
        shall require the grant recipient to submit quarterly reports 
        to the Secretary that describe each expenditure made by the 
        recipient using grant funds.
            ``(2) Deadline for reports.--Each report required under 
        paragraph (1) shall be submitted not later than 30 days after 
        the last day of a fiscal quarter and shall describe 
        expenditures made during that fiscal quarter.
    ``(b) Publication of Expenditures.--Not later than one week after 
receiving a report under subsection (a), the Secretary shall publish 
and make publicly available on the Internet website of the Department a 
description of each expenditure described in the report.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents in section 1(b) of 
such Act is amended by adding at the end of the items relating to such 
subtitle the following:

``Sec. 890A. Expenditure reports as a condition of homeland security 
                            grants''.
                                 <all>
```
complaint. See NRCP 3 ("A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint 

with the court."). Thus, we conclude that the district court did not abuse 

its discretion. SeeS Moore, 90 Nev. at 393-94, 528 P.2d at 1020-21. 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.' 

cet...tx J. 

Hardesty 

Chsza 

Cherry 

J. 

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge 

Charles H. Hill 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Carson City Clerk 

'We have considered the proper person motions that appellant has 

filed, conclude that they do not warrant reversal, and deny them as moot. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

707 1947A de