alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Description of Annual Cash Bonus Plan



 Exhibit 10.11 
 Summary of Cash Bonus Plan 
 The Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors of First Defiance Financial Corp. (“First Defiance”) administers First Defiance’s annual cash bonus plan for officers of First Defiance and its subsidiary, First Federal Bank of the Midwest. The annual cash
bonus paid to officers is based on First Defiance’s annual performance as measured by six key performance measures: earnings per share, net charge off’s, non-performing asset levels, non-interest expense levels, return on average equity
and return on average assets. In determining the amount of cash bonus to be awarded, each of the target measures is assigned a weighting factor: 30% for earnings per share; 15% for each of net charge off level, non-performing asset level,
return on average equity, and return on average assets; and10% for non-interest expense levels. 
 Within each
of these six components, there are threshold, target and maximum goals. Performance below the threshold results in no payout for that component. Performance at the threshold level results in a 50% payout of that component. Performance at
the target level results in a 100% payout of that component. Performance at or above the maximum goal results in a 150% payout of that component. Exact payout percentages for payouts within the 50% to 150% range are calculated based on
actual results. The payout percentage achieved for each component is then multiplied by the weighting factor (30%, 15%, or 10%) and those six components are added together to determine the percentage of potential bonus that will be paid.

 This payout percentage is then applied to the bonus potential for each officer. The Chief Executive
Officer has a potential bonus equal to 45% of his base salary; the Chief Financial Officer, the President of First Federal Bank and the Market Area Presidents of First Federal Bank each have a potential bonus equal to between 20% and 35% of base
salary. Other officers with the rank of Executive Vice President have a potential bonus equal to 30% of base salary. Other officers with the rank of Senior Vice President have bonus potential ranging between 20% and 30% of base salary depending
upon the officer’s level of responsibility. As long as First Defiance is subject to the compensation restrictions established in conjunction with the Capital Purchase Program, any participant in the cash bonus plan who is prohibited from
receiving a cash bonus will be paid in restricted stock instead.
STATE of North Carolina v. John Henry WILLIAMS

No. 39P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

John Henry Williams, for Williams, John Henry.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, Vernon K. Stewart, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 23rd of January 2019 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Harnett County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
CHAMBERS v. The MOSES H. CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, et al.

147PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 12, 2019

John F. Bloss, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Chambers, Christopher.

Barry L. Kramer, Attorney at Law, for Chambers, Christopher.

Philip J. Mohr, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for The Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital, et al.

Brent Fancher Powell, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for The Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital, et al.

Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for N.C. Justice Center, et al.

Carol L. Brooke, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Justice Center, et al.

Jack Holtzman, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for N.C. Justice Center, et al.

Clermont F. Ripley, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Justice Center, et al.

William R. Corbett, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Justice Center, et al.

Deborah Goldstein, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for N.C. Justice Center, et al.

Narendra K. Ghosh, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for N.C. Justice Center, et al.

Ryan Y. Park, Deputy Solicitor General, for State of North Carolina.

Daniel Wilkes, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Matt Burke, Solicitor General Fellow, for State of North Carolina

Linwood Jones, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for North Carolina Healthcare Association.

*222The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of July 2019 by Defendant to File Amended Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th of July 2019."
No. 09-9745.

#### Edward Tucker, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1087, 130 S. Ct. 2135,

176 L. Ed. 2d 757,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3170.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 350 Fed. Appx. 512.
Second Amendment to PNC Financial's Supplemental Incentive Savings Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.15 
 SECOND AMENDMENT 
 THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. 

SUPPLEMENTAL INCENTIVE SAVINGS PLAN 
 (as amended and restated effective May 5, 2009) 
 WHEREAS, The PNC Financial Services Group,
Inc. (“PNC”) sponsors The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Supplemental Incentive Savings Plan (the “Plan”); 
 WHEREAS,
Section 10 of the Plan authorizes PNC to amend the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, PNC wishes to amend the Plan to revise the definition of
“Compensation Threshold”. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED that the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of
January 1, 2010: 
  

	1.	Section 1.9 (“Compensation Threshold”) is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 


““Compensation Threshold” for a year means the amount of compensation designated under Internal Revenue Code
Section 416(i)(1)(A)(i) for such year by the Internal Revenue Service.” 
 Executed and adopted by the Chief Human Resources Officer
of The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. this 23rd day of December, 2010 pursuant to the authority delegated by the Corporation’s Personnel and Compensation Committee. 

 

			
	
	/s/ Joan L. Gulley
	Joan L. Gulley
	Chief Human Resources Officer
# C_2016276EN.01002302.xml

| 29.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/23

---

Corrigendum to Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 171 of 12 May 2016
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 171 of 12 May 2016

(2016/C 276/05)

On page 5, section ‘Deadline for submission of tenders’:

for:

for:

‘27 June 2016, 10:00 CET’,

read:

read:

‘15 August 2016, 10:00 CET’.

---
No. 09-717.

#### Delma Banks, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

559 U.S. 1068, 130 S. Ct. 2092,

176 L. Ed. 2d 723,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3309.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 583 F.3d 295.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5226 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5226

   To repeal certain tax provisions of the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2006

Ms. DeGette (for herself and Mr. Markey) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To repeal certain tax provisions of the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Energy Fairness Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CERTAIN TAX PROVISIONS OF THE ENERGY POLICY ACT OF 
              2005.

    (a) Repeal.--The following provisions, and amendments made by such 
provisions, of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 are hereby repealed:
            (1) Section 1321 (relating to extension of credit for 
        producing fuel from nonconventional source for facilities 
        producing coke or coke gas).
            (2) Section 1323 (relating to temporary expensing for 
        equipment used in refining of liquid fuels).
            (3) Section 1324 (relating to pass through to owners of 
        deduction for capital costs incurred by small refiner 
        cooperatives in complying with Environmental Protection Agency 
        sulfur regulations).
            (4) Section 1325 (relating to natural gas distribution 
        lines treated as 15-year property).
            (5) Section 1326 (relating to natural gas gathering lines 
        treated as 7-year property).
            (6) Section 1327 (relating to non-application of arbitrage 
        rules to prepayments for natural gas).
            (7) Section 1328 (relating to determination of small 
        refiner exception to oil depletion deduction).
            (8) Section 1329 (relating to amortization of geological 
        and geophysical expenditures).
    (b) Administration of Internal Revenue Code of 1986.--The Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied and administered as if the 
provisions, and amendments, specified in subsection (a) had never been 
enacted.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-7241.

#### Javier Ochoa Canales, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 1155, 132 S. Ct. 1134,

181 L. Ed. 2d 975,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 748.

January 17, 2012.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until February 7, 2012, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
No. 09-9581.

#### Edres Montgomery, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1081, 130 S. Ct. 2122,

176 L. Ed. 2d 746,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3227.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 358 Fed. Appx. 622.
EXHIBIT 10.12

 

SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS

 

Independent non-employee directors of Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (the “Company”) will receive the following compensation in 2011:

 

·                  An annual retainer fee of $100,000;

 

·                  The committee chairpersons will receive additional annual fees as follows:

 

	
Lead Independent Director
    	
 $35,000
    
	
Audit Committee Chairperson
    	
 $30,000
    
	
Compensation Committee Chairperson
    	
 $20,000
    
	
Nominating & Governance Committee   Chairperson
    	
 $15,000
    


 

·                  The committee members, other than the chairpersons, will receive additional annual fees as follows:

 

	
Audit Committee 
    	
 $12,000
    
	
Compensation Committee 
    	
 $8,000
    
	
Nominating & Governance Committee 
    	
 $6,000
    
	
Pricing Committee 
    	
 $6,000
    


 

·                  Reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred to attend such meetings;

 

·                  A restricted stock grant of 1,365 shares of common stock on December 31, 2010 under the Company’s Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Award and Incentive Plan. Such shares vest as follows: 342 shares vest on March 31, 2011, 341 shares vest on March 31, 2012, 341 shares vest on March 31, 2013 and 341 shares vest on March 31, 2014.

 

The Company’s independent non-employee directors may elect to defer all or any portion of the fees above in accordance with the Company’s deferred compensation plan for its directors.

 

Directors who are also employees of the Company will not receive any compensation for their services as directors of the Company.
clpt Overview

The Office of Civil Liberties, Privacy and Transparency (CLPT) leads the integration of civil liberties 

and privacy protections into the policies, procedures, 

programs and activities of the Intelligence Community 

(IC). Its overarching goal is to ensure that the IC operates within the full scope of its authorities in a manner 

that protects civil liberties and privacy, provides appropriate transparency, and earns and retains the trust of 

the American people.

clpt purpos

Public trust is essential to the IC’s mission. It enables 

the IC to act within the full scope of its authorities, 

obtain new authorities as appropriate, and earn the 

cooperation of key partners. 

CLPT helps ensure that the IC conducts itself in a 

manner that gives the American people confidence 

that it is pursuing its vital security mission in a manner 

that exemplifies American values. The IC must protect 

civil liberties and privacy while providing appropriate 

transparency.

Clpt responsibiliti

CLPT is led by the Civil Liberties Protection Officer, 

a position established by the Intelligence Reform and 

Prevention Act of 2004. The Act provides that the Civil 

Liberties Protection Officer reports directly to the 

Director of National Intelligence (DNI), and sets forth 

his duties, which include ensuring that privacy and 

civil liberties protections are appropriately addressed 

in the policies and procedures of intelligence agencies; 

overseeing compliance by the ODNI with privacy and 

civil liberties in programs and operations administered 

by the ODNI; and ensuring that the use of technology 

sustains, and does not erode, privacy.

CLPT and transpar

The Civil Liberties Protection Officer also serves as the 

ODNI’s Chief Transparency Officer. In that capacity, 

he is responsible for leading implementation of the 

Principles of Intelligence Transparency for the IC. The 

Principles guide how the IC should make information 

publicly available while protecting classified information, when disclosure would harm national security.

In addition, CLPT champions the Principles of Professional Ethics for the IC: Mission, Truth, Lawfulness, 

Integrity, Stewardship, Excellence and Diversity. These 

are the fundamental ethical principles that unite professionals across agencies and functions. These principles also distinguish the intelligence profession from 

others. 

CLPT Fact sh

ODNI Office of civil liberties, privacy and t

clpt Highligh

• Helps the IC carry out its duties in a way that 

protects civil liberties and privacy

• Reviews complaints regarding possible abuses of 

civil liberties and privacy

• Leads the IC’s transparency efforts, promoting 

the community-wide adoption of the Principles 

of Intelligence Transparency for the Intelligence 

Community
EXHIBIT 32.1

Walter Industries, Inc.  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Walter Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report"),
I, Victor P. Patrick, Vice Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

Date:
February 27, 2009

/s/ VICTOR P. PATRICK Victor P. Patrick
Vice Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)


---



QuickLinks
Terry PIGFORD, Plaintiff, v. Christopher PACE, Jr. and Tineka A. Pace, Defendants.

No. COA18-1095

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 21, 2019

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report of West Bancorporation, Inc. on Form 10-Q
      for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas E. Stanberry, Chairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of West Bancorporation, Inc., certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) The report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of West
      Bancorporation, Inc.





August
      3,
      2007




/s/
              Thomas E.
              StanberryThomas
                E. Stanberry
              Chairman,
                President and Chief Executive Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. Charles Gene ROGERS

No. 444P09-6

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 16, 2019

Charles Gene Rogers, for Rogers, Charles Gene.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*259***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 15th of April 2019 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Wayne County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of April 2019."
STATE of North Carolina v. David Leroy CARVER

No. 196A19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 17, 2019

Leslie S. Robinson, Greenville, Attorney at Law, for Carver, David Leroy.

Douglas W. Corkhill, Assistant Attorney General, Mr. Seth H. Edwards, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

State of N. C. Judicial Dept., for NC Judicial Department.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 28th of May 2019 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of June 2019."
EXHIBIT 32.2











Certification
of Chief Financial Officer of ULURU Inc.


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant


to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002











In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ULURU Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the “Report”), the
undersigned officer of ULURU Inc. does hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18
U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1.)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2.)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.











Date: May 15, 2009
            
            /s/
      Terrance K. WallbergTerrance
      K. WallbergVice
      President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
No. 11-463.

#### Dolores F. Anderson, aka Dodie Anderson, et al., Petitioners v. National Heritage Foundation, Inc.

565 U.S. 1093, 132 S. Ct. 850,

181 L. Ed. 2d 550,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8930.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same cases below, 439 Fed. Appx. 238.
**Exhibit
      32**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 135


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Seasons Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, who
      are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, respectively,
      of the Company, hereby each certify as follows:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/
                William L. SuttonWilliam
                L. SuttonChief
                Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer)/s/
                Nita ElliottNita
                ElliottChief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)





August
      11, 2006





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                  5
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      6,741
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                               3,957
<ALLOWANCES>                                    8
<INVENTORY>                                   327
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           11,063
<PP&E>                                     66,923
<DEPRECIATION>                             26,743
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             51,426
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       9,873
<BONDS>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       70
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       1,317
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                 40,126
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               51,426
<SALES>                                     8,582
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            8,651
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               6,136
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            2,314
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            661
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,704)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,704)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,292)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.92)




</TABLE>