alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 152.25 Exemptions for pesticides of a character not requiring FIFRA 

regulation. 

(f) Minimum risk pesticides —(1) Exempted products. Products containing the following active ingredients are exempt 

from the requirements of FIFRA, alone or in combination with other substances listed in this paragraph, provided that 

all of the criteria of this section are met. 

Castor oil (U.S.P. or equivalent) 

Cedar oil 

Cinnamon and cinnamon oil 

Citric acid 

Citronella and citronella oil 

Cloves and clove oil 

Corn gluten meal 

Corn oil 

Cottonseed oil 

Dried blood 

Eugenol 

Garlic and garlic oil 

Geraniol 

Geranium oil 

Lauryl sulfate 

Lemongrass oil 

Linseed oil 

Malic acid 

Mint and mint oil 

Peppermint and peppermint oil 

2-Phenethyl propionate (2-phenylethyl propionate) 

Potassium sorbate 
Putrescent whole egg solids 

Rosemary and rosemary oil 

Sesame (includes ground sesame plant) and sesame oil 

Sodium chloride (common salt) 

Sodium lauryl sulfate 

Soybean oil 

Thyme and thyme oil 

White pepper 

Zinc metal strips (consisting solely of zinc metal and impurities) 

(2) Permitted inerts . A pesticide product exempt under paragraph (f)(1) of this section may only include inert 

ingredients listed in the most current List 4A. This list is updated periodically. The most current list may be obtained 

by contacting the Registration Division at the appropriate address as set forth in 40 CFR 150.17(a) or (b). 

(3) Other conditions of exemption. All of the following conditions must be met for products to be exempted under this 

section: 

(i) Each product containing the substance must bear a label identifying the name and percentage (by weight) of each 

active ingredient and the name of each inert ingredient. 

(ii) The product must not bear claims either to control or mitigate microorganisms that pose a threat to human health, 

including but not limited to disease transmitting bacteria or viruses, or claims to control insects or rodents carrying 

specific diseases, including, but not limited to ticks that carry Lyme disease. 

(iii) The product must not include any false and misleading labeling statements, including those listed in 40 CFR 

156.10(a)(5)(i) through (viii). 

[53 FR 15977, May 4, 1988, as amended at 59 FR 2751, Jan. 19, 1994; 61 FR 8878, Mar. 6, 1996; 66 FR 64764, 

Dec. 14, 2001; 71 FR 35545, June 21, 2006]
(January 16, 2001)

#### Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Respondent, v 2 Broadway L. L. C. et al., Appellants.

[720 NYS2d 12]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered May 26, 2000, which, in a commercial landlord-tenant dispute, granted plaintiffs motion for a *Yellowstone*injunction, and denied defendants’ motion to disqualify plaintiffs counsel without prejudice to renewal after discovery, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, to condition the *Yellowstone*injunction on plaintiffs payment, during the pendency of such injunction, of use and occupancy of the leased premises, from the date of this order forward, in the amount of $1,737,069 per month, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

In this dispute concerning whether plaintiff tenant was entitled to take certain offsets against its current rent, plaintiff was properly granted a *Yellowstone*injunction *(see, Graubard Mollen Horowitz Pomeranz & Shapiro v 600 Third Ave. Assocs.,*93 NY2d 508, 514), but should have been required to pay for use and occupancy. *(See, e.g., 401 Hotel v MTI / The Image Group,*271 AD2d 228, 230; *Phillips & Huyler Assocs. v Flynn,*225 AD2d 475; *MMB Assocs. v Dayan,*169 AD2d 422.) In fixing the amount, we have taken into consideration that that is the amount the Metropolitan Transportation Authority is required to pay pursuant to a Civil Court order staying the parallel summary nonpayment proceeding pending the adjudication of this action. The motion court erroneously considered and accepted the argument against requiring such payments, which plaintiff improperly raised for the first time in a letter of counsel presented after the motion had been orally argued and submitted *(see, Scherrer v Time Equities,*218 AD2d 116, 120), without giving defendants notice, prior to deciding the motion, that it intended to consider such argument. In any event, we find that argument unpersuasive. The motion court did not err, however, in not requiring plaintiff to file an undertaking. *(See,*Public Authorities Law § 1212-a; *Eastern Paralyzed Veterans Assn. v Metropolitan Transp. Auth.,*79 AD2d 516.)

The motion court properly denied without prejudice defen*316dants’ motion to disqualify the law firm representing plaintiff pursuant to Code of Professional Responsibility DR 5-102 (22 NYCRR 1200.21), since defendants failed to establish that the testimony of the attorney who purportedly ought to be called as a witness would be noncumulative of other witnesses’ testimony, and thus necessary, or that such testimony, if the attorney were called to testify by defendants, would be prejudicial to plaintiff. *(See, S & S Hotel Ventures Ltd. Partnership v*777 *S. H. Corp.,*69 NY2d 437, 445-446; *Broadwhite Assocs. v Truong,*237 AD2d 162, 162-163; *Matter of Cowen & Co. v Tecnoconsult Holdings,*234 AD2d 86.) Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rubin, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.
No. 09-9766.

#### Marshall Richmond, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1085, 130 S. Ct. 2136,

176 L. Ed. 2d 754,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3210.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 841.
Print
  
 For Immediate Release:                                                  Contact: (301) 243-0403 1 March 2024This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.  NCSC Executive Director Remarks at Intelligence Community Centers for Academic Excellence Summit  On February 24, 2024, NCSC Executive Director Mirriam-Grace MacIntyre discussed research security at the Intelligence Community Centers for Academic Excellence (IC CAE) Principal Investigators Development Summit in San Antonio, TX.  Remarks as Prepared for Delivery, Mirriam-Grace MacIntyre, Executive Director, National Counterintelligence and Security Center at the Intelligence Community Centers for Academic Excellence (IC CAE), Principal Investigators Development Summit, San Antonio, Texas, February 21, 2024  # # #
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Hewitt Associates, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                     |  |     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 4, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ John J. Park       
|                     |  |     |  | John J. Park           
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Hewitt Associates, Inc. and will be retained by Hewitt
Associates, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
No. 09-9951.

#### Moshe Dayan Aitch, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1114, 130 S. Ct. 2423,

176 L. Ed. 2d 937,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3794.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 352 Fed. Appx. 788.
No. 09-666.

#### Lithium Power Technologies, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. United States ex rel. Alfred J. Longhi, Jr., et al.

559 U.S. 1067, 130 S. Ct. 2092,

176 L. Ed. 2d 722,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3370.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 575 F.3d 458.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Michael J. Cunningham, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Aeropostale, Inc., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Aeropostale,
Inc.;  2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;  3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this quarterly report;  4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:  (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures based on our evaluation as of the end of the period
covered by this quarterly report; and  (c)
    
    disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation on internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and  (b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal controls. /s/ MICHAEL J. CUNNINGHAMMichael J. CunninghamExecutive Vice President - Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) Date: December 3, 2004 22
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23(a)

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement of Lindsay Manufacturing Co. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-00769) of our
report dated September 28, 2000 on our audit of the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule of Lindsay Manufacturing Co., as of
August 31, 2000 and for the year ended August 31, 2000, which report is in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2002.

                                         /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
                                         ------------------------------
                                         PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Omaha, Nebraska
November 25, 2002



                                       46
Print	

Intelligence Community (IC) Policy supports integration across the Community and aligns to executive direction, legislative requirements, DNI strategic initiatives, and IC priorities. Intelligence Community Directive 101, *IC Policy System* provides the framework for IC Policy, which includes IC Directives and subordinate IC Policy Guidance.

 

As circumstances require, the Policy Division works closely with ODNI Components and the IC elements to review, revise, and rescind policies to ensure that IC Policy is relevant and current.

Consistent with the Principles of Intelligence Transparency for the IC, this list of active, unclassified policies is intended to foster public understanding about the policies that govern the IC’s activities.

### IC Policy LIBRARY

      - Intelligence Community Directives  (ICDs)
      - Intelligence Community Policy Guidance  (ICPG)
      - Intelligence Community Policy Memorandums  (ICPMs)
      - IC Legal Reference Book

 

----

### OTHER

      - ICS 500-35 Implementing Frameworks Governing Appropriate Use of IC Online Collaboration Platforms
      - National Intelligence Strategy  (2023)
      - IC Demographic Statistics Report  (2019)
      - Transparency Implementation Plan  (2015)
      - FISA Amendments Act of 2008  (FAA)
      - Records Requested Under FOIA    I    ODNI FOIA Page
      - Records Control Schedules
      - Selected Intelligence Reports

### IC ON THE RECORD

IC on the Record is a Tumblr blog maintained by ODNI to highlight the lawful intelligence activities of the U.S. Intelligence Community. It features declassified information as well as speeches, statements, testimony and oversight activities.

### NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE COUNCIL PRODUCTS 

The NIC supports the DNI in his role as head of the IC by providing senior policymakers with the views of the entire IC and serving as a bridge between the intelligence and policy communities. Among the NIC’s primary products are the National Intelligence Estimates (NIEs) - the IC’s most authoritative written assessments on national security issues. The NIC also reaches out to nongovernmental experts in academia and the private sector to broaden the IC’s knowledge and perspectives, and serving as the IC “think tank.”

 

You can find all the public NIC products here.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET AT DECEMBER  31, 1998 AND THE RELATED  CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS  AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 OF
STRATFORD  AMERICAN  CORPORATION  AND ITS  SUBSIDIARIES  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY>   U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                           2,111,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      232,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2,000
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,133,000
<PP&E>                                             415,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                      72,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,915,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              245,000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               59,000
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,840,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,915,000
<SALES>                                              2,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   112,000
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       25,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   220,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  50,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (183,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (183,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   3,884,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,701,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.63
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Pamela  Starek,  certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  on  Form 10-QSB of Delta Oil & Gas, Inc. for the quarterly period ending
September  30,  2002  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects
the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations of Delta Oil & Gas, Inc.


                                    By:      /S/ Pamela  Starek
                                             --------------

                                    Name:     Pamela  Starek
                                    Title:    Chief  Executive  Officer,
                                              President,  Chief  Financial
                                              Officer

                                    Date:     December  12,  2002
In the MATTER OF: N.B., M.S., L.W.

No. COA18-1087

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 21, 2019

AFFIRMED IN PART. REVERSED IN PART. REMANDED.
DESMOND v. The NEWS & OBSERVER PUBLISHING COMPANY, et al.

132PA18-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 1, 2019

John A. Bussian, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Bradley R. Kutrow, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Julia C. Ambrose, Attorney at Law, Mark J. Prak, Attorney at Law, Timothy Nelson, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for The News And Observer Publishing Company, et al.

James T. Johnson, Attorney at Law, Chynna T. Smith, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Desmond, Beth.

William M. Wilson, III, Attorney at Law, for Professor William Van Alstyne

Jonathan E. Buchan, Attorney at Law, for The Reporters Committee for Freedom of Press, et al.

Wade M. Smith, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Locke, Mandy.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th of April 2019 by Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of May 2019."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the annual report of Patriot Scientific Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended May 31, 2005, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification
      is
      an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of Patriot Scientific
      Corporation does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      October 16, 2006


/s/
                Thomas J. Sweeney
              Thomas
                J. Sweeney
              *Chief
                Financial Officer*
# C_2017398EN.01000101.xml

| 24.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8656 — Mitsui/Sime Darby/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 398/01)

On 16 November 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8656. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8656. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---