alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 09-9977.

#### Carl A. Parker, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1115, 130 S. Ct. 2425,

176 L. Ed. 2d 938,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3710.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
exhibit10ll.htm


 


Exhibit 10(ll)


 


 


CenterPoint Energy, Inc.


Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation


 


The following is a summary of compensation paid to the non-employee directors of CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) effective April 22, 2010. For additional information regarding the compensation of the non-employee directors, please read the definitive proxy statement relating to the Company’s 2011 annual meeting of shareholders to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A.


 




	  	
•

	  	
Annual retainer fee of $50,000 for Board membership;


	  	  	  	  
	  	
•

	  	
Fee of $2,000 for each Board or Committee meeting attended;


	  	  	  	  
	  	
•

	  	
Supplemental annual retainer of $15,000 for serving as a chairman of the Audit Committee or Compensation Committee; and


	  	  	  	  
	  	
•

	  	
Supplemental annual retainer of $5,000 for serving as a chairman of any other Board committee.









 


The Chairman receives the compensation payable to other non-employee directors plus supplemental compensation authorized by the board of directors of the Company, as summarized in Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2010, which exhibit is incorporated by reference herein.


 


Stock Grants. Each non-employee director may also receive an annual grant of up to 5,000 shares of CenterPoint Energy common stock which vest on the first anniversary of the grant date. Upon the initial nomination to the Board, in addition to the annual grant, a non-employee director may be granted a one-time grant of up to 5,000 shares of CenterPoint Energy common stock.


 


Deferred Compensation Plan. Directors may elect each year to defer all or part of their annual retainer fees, including committee chairman fees, and meeting fees. Directors participating in these plans may elect to receive distributions of their deferred compensation and interest in three ways: (i) an early distribution of either 50% or 100% of their account balance in any year that is at least four years from the year of deferral up to the year in which they reach age 70, (ii) a lump sum distribution payable in the year after they reach age 70 or upon leaving the Board of Directors, whichever is later, or (iii) 15 annual installments beginning on the first of the month coincident with or next following age 70 or upon leaving the Board of Directors, whichever is later.


 


Executive Life Insurance Plan. Non-employee directors who were elected to the Board before 2001 participate in CenterPoint Energy’s executive life insurance plan. This plan provides endorsement split-dollar life insurance with a death benefit of $180,000 with coverage continuing after the director’s termination of service at age 65 or later. Directors elected to the Board after 2000 may not participate in this plan.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual
Report of China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc Urbach,
Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and will be retained by China
Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




February
      10, 2009
            By:
            /s/ Marc
      UrbachName: Marc UrbachTitle: 
      President (Principal Executive
Officer)
STATE of North Carolina v. Christopher B. SMITH

No. 119PA18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Jason C. Yoder, Attorney at Law, For Smith, Christopher B.

Tiffany Y. Lucas, Assistant Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 18th of April 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 3rd of May 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         2,435
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 28,949
<ALLOWANCES>                                     363
<INVENTORY>                                    5,302
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              40,901
<PP&E>                                       216,073
<DEPRECIATION>                               126,276
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               130,929
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         24,452
<BONDS>                                       34,125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       8,763
<OTHER-SE>                                    47,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 130,929
<SALES>                                      172,013
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             172,013
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                155,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,334
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,552
<INCOME-TAX>                                     768
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              784
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     784
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .09<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .09<F1>
        

<FN>
(1)  EPS-Primary and EPS-Diluted have been restated to reflect the application
     of Financial Accounting Standard No. 128, "Earnings Per Share."
</FN>


</TABLE>
No. 09-9300.

#### In re Gregory Taylor, Petitioner.

559 U.S. 1036, 130 S. Ct. 2080,

176 L. Ed. 2d 430,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2772.

March 29, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for *431leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Eon Labs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bernhard Hampl, Ph.D., ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

|              |                     |
|-------------------|--------------------------|
|              | /s/                      | Bernhard  Hampl, Ph.D. |   |
|              | Bernhard  Hampl, Ph.D.   |
|              | Chief  Executive Officer |
| November 13, 2003 |                     |

 

 

----
Barbara C. LYON, Individually and as Trustee of the Donald F. and Barbara C. Lyon Revocable Living Trust, Plaintiff, v. SERVICE TEAM OF PROFESSIONALS (EASTERN CAROLINA), LLC d/b/a 24/Restore and United Services Automobile Association, Defendants, v. Service Team of Professionals (Eastern Carolina), LLC d/b/a 24/Store, Third Party Plaintiff, v. Coastal Restoration Service, Inc. d/b/a Servpro of Pitt/greene & Craven/Pamlico Counties, Third-Party Defendant.

No. COA18-627

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 16, 2019

AFFIRM.
No. 09-7278.

#### Edward Z. Camillo, Petitioner v. Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

559 U.S. 1088, 130 S. Ct. 2143,

176 L. Ed. 2d 760,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3178.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1122, 130 S. Ct. 1073, 175 L. Ed. 2d 901, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 153.
# C_2017381EN.01000101.xml

| 11.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8514 — Evonik/DSM/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 381/01)

On 26 October 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8514. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8514. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| March 29, 2007

  | By:    | /s/                                  David A. Wheat |   |
|------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| (Date)

          |   | David A. Wheat

Director, Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

                                                                                                          |   |

 

 

 

 

----
No. 09-8840.

#### Angel Reyes, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 987, 130 S. Ct. 1728,

176 L. Ed. 2d 206,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1957.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Henry Burns, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 667]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Spinner, J.), imposed August 20, 1999, upon his conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree and rape in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being concurrent indeterminate terms of 3V2 to 7 years imprisonment and lVs to 4 years imprisonment, respectively.

Ordered that the sentencé is modified, on the law, by reduc*587ing the term of imprisonment imposed on the defendant’s conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree from 3V2 to 7 years imprisonment to 3 to 6 years imprisonment; as so modified, the sentence is affirmed.

The court was not authorized to unilaterally impose an enhanced sentence based upon its conclusion that in protesting his innocence during a pre-sentence interview, the defendant violated a condition of his plea of guilty that he would fully cooperate with the probation department *(see, People v Parker,*271 AD2d 63; *People v Gerena,*219 AD2d 734; *People v Stennett,*207 AD2d 847; *People v Raffaele,*199 AD2d 545; *People v Carr,*135 AD2d 722; *People v Daniels,*132 AD2d 667; *People v Brunson,*131 AD2d 689; *People v Nunez,*248 AD2d 561). Accordingly, the sentence is modified by reducing the term of imprisonment imposed on the conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree to the term originally promised in the plea agreement. Bracken, Acting P. J., S. Miller, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.8



 EXHIBIT 10.8 
 THIRD AMENDMENT TO 
 THE ALLERGAN, INC. 

2003 NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 

THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE ALLERGAN, INC. 2003 NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN (this “Third
Amendment”), dated as of November 29, 2010, is made and adopted by Allergan, Inc. (the “Company”). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Plan
(as defined below). 
 RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Allergan, Inc. 2003 Nonemployee Director Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Plan”); 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”)
may amend the Plan at any time and from time to time; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan as set
forth herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan be amended as follows: 

1.    Section 4.12 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

 “4.12    Transferability. No award or right under the Plan,
contingent or otherwise, shall be assignable or otherwise transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, or shall be subject to any encumbrance, pledge or charge of any nature. Any Award shall be accepted during a
Participant’s lifetime only by the Participant or the Participant’s guardian or other legal representative. 
 Notwithstanding anything else in this Section 4.12, the Board by express provision in the Award or an amendment thereto may permit an Award to be transferred to, exercised by and paid to certain
persons or entities related to the Participant, including but not limited to members of the Participant’s family, charitable institutions, or trusts or other entities whose beneficiaries or beneficial owners are members of the
Participant’s family and/or charitable institutions, or to such other persons or entities as may be expressly approved by the Board, pursuant to such conditions and procedures as the Board may establish. Any permitted transfer shall be subject
to the condition that the Board receive evidence satisfactory to it that the transfer is being made for estate and/or tax planning purposes (or to a “blind trust” in connection with the Participant’s termination of employment or
service with the Company to assume a position with a governmental, charitable, educational or similar non-profit institution) and on a basis consistent with the Company’s lawful issue of securities.” 

2.    This Third Amendment shall be effective as of the date hereof. 







 3.    This Third Amendment shall be and is hereby
incorporated in and forms a part of the Plan. 
 4.    Except as set forth herein, the Plan
shall remain in full force and effect. 
 I hereby certify that the foregoing Third Amendment was duly adopted
by the Board of Directors of Allergan, Inc. on November 29, 2010. 
 Executed on this 29th day of November,
2010. 
  

			
	By:	 	/s/ Matthew J. Maletta
	Name:	 	Matthew J. Maletta
	Title:	 	 Vice President, Associate General Counsel
 and Secretary
LANCE R. LEFLEUR oBERT R J. BERTM DIRECTOR 

# A©EM

GOVERNOR

Alabama Department of Environmental Management

adem.elaboma.gov 1400 Coliseum Blvd. 36110-2400 • Post Office Box 301463

Mont g omer y . Alabama 36130-1463 !334)271-7700■ FAX (334) 271-7950

James D. Giattina, Director Water Protection Division USEPA Re g ion 4 Atlanta Federal Center 61 Fors y th Street Atlania. Geor g ia 30303-8960

Re: State of Alabama: CWA Section 401 (a ) Water Qualit y Certification and Coastal Consistenc y

Determination - Vessel General Permit (VGP) re-issuance and Small Vessel General Permit (SVGP) ADEM Trackin g ID: 2012-261-EPA

Dear Mr. Giattina:

The Alabama Deparlment of Environmental Mana g ement ( ADEM ) has reviewed the draft permits. accompan y in g facts sheets, and EPA's determinations of coastal consistenc y for the above referenced proposed permits.

Because action pertinent to water q ualit y certification is re q uired b y Section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act ( CWA). 33 U S.C. Section 1251, et se q ., we hereb y issue certification, for a period not to exceed five (5) year from the date of issuance of the permits, that there is reasonable assurance that the dischar g es resultin g from the proposed activities will not violate applicable water qualit y standards established under Section 303 of the CWA and Title 22. Section 22-22-9( g ), Code of Alabama. 1975. We further certif y that there are no applicable effluent limitations under Section 301 and 302 nor applicable standards under Section 306 and 307 of the CWA in re g ard to the activities specified. In addition. the ADEM concurs with EPA s determinations that the proposed permits are consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the enforceable policies of the Alabama Coastal Area Mana g ement Pro g ram provided that dischar g es authorized under VGP and sVGP do not result in a violation of Water Qualit y Standards in State waters.

If y ou have an y q uestions re g ardin g this matter, please contact J. Scott Brown b y email at sb(o)adem.state.al.us or b y phone at ( 251 )

432-6533.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 50551 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

EDUARDO NAJERA

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:16

- CR

- 476

- 1

Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eduardo Najera has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Najera has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and

the relevan t portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Najera ’ s

response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 31, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-50551 Document: 00515294395 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/31/2020No. 19

- 50551

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel i s excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. * *

* * Judge Higginson would deny counsel’s dismissal. Case: 19-50551 Document: 00515294395 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/31/2020
No. 09-571.

#### Harry F. Connick, District Attorney, et al., Petitioners v. John Thompson.

559 U.S. 1004, 130 S. Ct. 1880,

176 L. Ed. 2d 399,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2612.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.

Same case below, 578 F.3d 293.
# C_2017444EN.01000201.xml

| 23.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 444/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 444/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8647 — Värde/Fraikin)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 444/02)

On 18 December 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8647. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8647. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp., (the“Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mary Jane Robertson, Executive Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asenacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated:  October 28, 2005 By:  /s/    *Mary Jane Robertson*    Mary Jane Robertson    Executive Vice President,