alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zaldiva, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), we, Nicole Leigh, President, and Robert B. Lees, CFO of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Date:August 13, 2010By:/s/Nicole LeighNicole Leigh, President and Director  Date:August 13, 2010By:/s/Robert B. LeesRobert B. Lees, CFO and Director
No. 09-10158.

#### Rafael Yeje-Cabrera, Petitioner v. United States.

560 U.S. 916, 130 S. Ct. 3304,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1205,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4157.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7170
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus HERBERT COUNCIL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:92-cr-00097-GCM) Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 24, 2008 Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Herbert Council, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Herbert Council appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for the Court to Enter an Order for Immediate Relief.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Council , No. 3:92-cr-00097-GCM (W.D.N.C. July 24, 2007). We deny Council’s motion for bail pending appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31



CERTIFICATION

We, John O. Jones, Jr. and Robert J. Wikins certify that:

1.   We have read this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Joning Corporation;

2.   To our knowledge the information in this report is true in all important
     respects as of May 31, 2003; and

3.   This report contains all information about the company of which we are
     aware that we believe important to a reasonable investor, in light of the
     subjects required to be addressed in this report as of May 31, 2003.

For purposes of this certification, information is "important to a reasonable
investor" if:

     (a)  There is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable investor would
          view the information as significantly altering the total mix of
          information in the report; and

      (b)  The report would be misleading to a reasonable investor if the
          information was omitted from the report.


Date: January 28, 2004

                                                   /s/ John O. Jones, Jr.
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                       John O. Jones, Jr.





                                                  /s/ Robert J. Wikins
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                      Robert J. Wikins
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Jun-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                Jul-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                  Jun-30-1996
<CASH>                        62
<SECURITIES>                  3,746
<RECEIVABLES>                 750
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              4,565
<PP&E>                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                4,565
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         419
<BONDS>                       0
<COMMON>                      23
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         2,895
<PREFERRED>                   0
<OTHER-SE>                    (1,228)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  4,565
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              0
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               0
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                (2,547)
<EXTRAORDINARY>               2,815
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  267
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .06
        



</TABLE>
STATE v. Maechel S. PATTERSON

597P01-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Maechel Shawn Patterson, For Patterson, Maechel Shawn

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, Seth H. Edwards, District Attorney, For State of N.C.

*427The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of February 2019 by Defendant for Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
No. 09-8975 (09A739).

#### Martin Edward Grossman, Petitioner v. Florida.

559 U.S. 932, 130 S. Ct. 1498,

176 L. Ed. 2d 105,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1029.

February 16, 2010.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Thomas, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 29 So. 3d 1034.
Joyce L. Connery, Chair

Thomas A. Summers, Vice Chair

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES

SAFETY BOARD

Washington, DC 20004-2901 

 March 29, 2024 

The Honorable Jennifer M. Granholm

Secretary of Energy

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20585-1000 

Dear Secretary Granholm: 

The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board has received your March 21, 2024, letter

requesting a 45-day extension to provide a response regarding Recommendation 2023-1, Onsite 

Transportation Safety. 

In accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 2286d(c)(1), the Board grants your request.

Sincerely, 

 Joyce L. Connery 

 Chair

c: Mr. Joe Olencz, Director, Office of the Departmental Representative to the Board
1. 

2. 

AFFIRMATION OF BOARD VOTING RECORD

SUBJECT: LANL.Recommendation 2023-1: Proposed Response to S-1 Request for 45-day Extension

Doc Control#: 2024-200-0003

The Board acted on the above document on 03/28/2024. The document was Approved.

The votes were recorded as:

APRVD DISAPRVD ABSTAIN NOT 

PARTICIPATING COMMENT DATE

Joyce L. Connery 03/28/2024

Thomas Summers 03/28/2024

This Record contains a summary of voting on this matter together with the individual vote sheets, views 

and comments of the Board Members.

Shelby Qualls

Executive Secretary to the Board

Attachments:

Voting Summary

Board Member Vote Sheets
DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

NOTATIONAL VOTE RESPONSE SHEET

FROM: Joyce L. Connery

SUBJECT: LANL.Recommendation 2023-1: Proposed Response to S-1 Request for 45-day Extension

Doc Control#: 2024-200-0003

DATE: 03/28/2024

VOTE: Approved

COMMENTS:

None

Joyce L. Connery
DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

NOTATIONAL VOTE RESPONSE SHEET

FROM: Thomas Summers

SUBJECT: LANL.Recommendation 2023-1: Proposed Response to S-1 Request for 45-day Extension

Doc Control#: 2024-200-0003

DATE: 03/28/2024

VOTE: Approved

COMMENTS:

None

Thomas Summers
EXHIBIT 32





Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350








Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pinnacle Airlines Corp. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Donald J. Breeding, the President and Chief Executive Officer, and Peter D. Hunt, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify that this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.








Signature
Title
Date/s/ Donald J. Breeding
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 5, 2011Donald J. Breeding/s/ Peter D. Hunt
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
May 5, 2011Peter D. Hunt
# C_2016339EN.01000601.xml

| 16.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/6

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2016/C 339/07)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 18.7.2016 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 18.7.2016 - 31.12.2016 |
| Member State | Sweden |
| Stock or Group of stocks | SAL/3B23.; SAL/3C22.; SAL/3D24.; SAL/3D25.; SAL/3D26.; SAL/3D27.; SAL/3D28.; SAL/3D29.; SAL/3D30.; SAL/3D31. |
| Species | Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) |
| Zone | Union waters of Subdivisions 22-31 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 20/TQ2072 |

Date and time of closure

18.7.2016

Duration

18.7.2016 - 31.12.2016

Member State

Sweden

Stock or Group of stocks

SAL/3B23.; SAL/3C22.; SAL/3D24.; SAL/3D25.; SAL/3D26.; SAL/3D27.; SAL/3D28.; SAL/3D29.; SAL/3D30.; SAL/3D31.

Species

Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)

Salmo salar

Zone

Union waters of Subdivisions 22-31

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

20/TQ2072

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50708 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GILBERTO DELGADO-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-112-1-WWJ

-------------------- Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Gilberto Delgado-Ramirez appeals his sentence following his guilty-plea conviction of illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). The district court sentenced him to 27 months of imprisonment, three years of supervised release, and a $100 special assessment. Delgado-Ramirez argues that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), because it does not require the fact of a priorNo. 04-50708 -2- aggravated-felony conviction to be charged in the indictment and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. As Delgado-Ramirez concedes, this argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United
States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), and Almendarez-Torres was not overruled by Apprendi

. See United States v. Sarmiento-Funes , 374 F.3d 336, 346 (5th Cir. 2004)

. For the first time on appeal, Delgado-Ramirez argues that, under United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), this court must vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing because the mandatory guideline regime was in place at the time of his sentencing. An unpreserved challenge to the computation of a defendant’s sentence under the formerly mandatory sentencing guidelines is reviewed for plain error. United States v. Mares , 402 F.3d 511, 520-21 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517). The district court’s application of the guidelines in their mandatory form constituted error that is “plain” for purposes of satisfying the first two prongs of the plain error analysis. See United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo , 407 F.3d 728, 733 (5th Cir. 2005). Delgado-Ramirez must nevertheless show that the court’s error affected his substantial rights. Id. To make such a showing, Delgado-Ramirez bears the burden of demonstrating “that the sentencing judge--sentencing under an advisory scheme rather than a mandatory one--would have reached a significantly different result.” See Mares , 402 F.3d at 521. Delgado-RamirezNo. 04-50708 -3- has failed to make such a showing. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
No. 09-627.

#### Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Petitioner v. Eric Lynn Moore.

559 U.S. 998, 130 S. Ct. 1736,

176 L. Ed. 2d 222,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2238.

March 8, 2010.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 342 Fed. Appx. 65.
No. 09-10073.

#### Joe S. Coffman, Petitioner v. United States.

560 U.S. 915, 130 S. Ct. 3301,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1203,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4038.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 364 Fed. Appx. 192.
STATE of North Carolina v. Anthony DOVE

No. 131P01-16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Anthony Dove, for Dove, Anthony.

Sherri Lawrence, Assistant Attorney General, Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, for State of NC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 28th of January 2019 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Lenoir County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of January 2019 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
No. 09-9850.

#### Allan Parmalee, Petitioner v. Jeffrey Uttecht, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary.

559 U.S. 1112, 130 S. Ct. 2417,

176 L. Ed. 2d 933,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3865.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

*934Same case below, 344 Fed. Appx. 395.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3427 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3427

 To repeal the renewable fuel program of the Environmental Protection 
                                Agency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 21, 2019

 Mr. Rooney of Florida (for himself, Mr. Stewart, Mr. McClintock, Mr. 
   Meadows, Mr. Gooden, Mr. Budd, Mr. Hice of Georgia, and Mr. Roy) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the renewable fuel program of the Environmental Protection 
                                Agency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Eliminating the RFS and Its 
Destructive Outcomes Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF RENEWABLE FUEL PROGRAM.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 211(o) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 
7545(o)) is repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Clean air act.--Section 211(d) of the Clean Air Act (42 
        U.S.C. 7545(d)) is amended--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)--
                            (i) by striking ``(n), or (o)'' each place 
                        it appears and inserting ``or (n)''; and
                            (ii) by striking ``(m), or (o)'' and 
                        inserting ``or (m)''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``(n), and (o)'' 
                each place it appears and inserting ``and (n)''.
            (2) Petroleum marketing practices act.--Section 
        107(a)(1)(B) of the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (15 
        U.S.C. 2807(a)(1)(B)) is amended by inserting ``, as in effect 
        on the day before the date of enactment of the Eliminating the 
        RFS and Its Destructive Outcomes Act'' after ``(40 CFR, part 
        80)''.
                                 <all>
```
SLOK, LLC, Plaintiff, v. COURTSIDE CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Defendant.

No. COA18-736

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 16, 2019

AFFIRMED IN PART. VACATED IN PART. REMANDED.
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, William F. Holt, Chief Financial Officer of Eon Labs, Inc. (the“registrant”), certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of the registrant;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)             designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)            evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)             disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)             all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)            any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: November 13, 2003 |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
|                    |
| /s/ William F. Holt     |   |
| William F. Holt         |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
No. 09-1096.

#### Fresenius USA, Inc. et al., Petitioners v. Baxter International, Inc., et al.

559 U.S. 1070, 130 S. Ct. 2120,

176 L. Ed. 2d 726,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3409.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

*727Same case below, 582 F.3d 1288.
No. 11-6953.

#### Segun Waldron, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1045, 132 S. Ct. 601,

181 L. Ed. 2d 440,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8159.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 449 Fed. Appx. 680.
No. 09-8905.

#### Michelle D. Smith, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1017, 130 S. Ct. 1908,

176 L. Ed. 2d 383,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2702.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 350 Fed. Appx. 54.
```
[Federal Register: March 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 54)]
[Notices]               
[Page 13523]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22mr10-36]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

 
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Overview 
Information; Migrant and Seasonal Farmworkers Program

Correction

    In notice document 2010-5976 beginning on page 13106 in the issue 
of Thursday, March 18, 2010 make the following correction:
    On page 13106, in the second column, under the Applications 
Available: heading, in the first line, ``April 2, 2010'' should read 
``March 18, 2010''.

[FR Doc. C1-2010-5976 Filed 3-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
tesco1026.htm


Exhibit 10.26












AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


WHEREAS, James A. Lank (“Executive”) and Tesco Corporation entered into the Employment Agreement dated December 31, 2007, as amended on March 15, 2009 and as thereafter supplemented by the letter dated July 19, 2010 between the parties (the “Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, Section 7(i)(v) of the Agreement has an error with respect to the timing of payment and no amount is vested thereunder and the parties desire to amend Section 7(f) of the Agreement to add requirements under new guidance from the Internal Revenue Service;


 


NOW, THEREFORE in consideration of mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed that the Agreement shall be amended as follows:


 



	
1.  

	
Section 7(f) shall be amended to add the following at the end thereof:







 


“Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, to the extent any amounts payable under Sections 7(c), (d) or (e) are deferred compensation and not otherwise exempt from the requirements of Code Section 409A, no payment will be paid or commence to be paid hereunder until the date which is the 60th day after the Date of Termination.”


 



	
2.  

	
Section 7(i)(v) shall be amended so that the word “second” shall be replaced with the word “first” in each place in which it occurs.







 


This Amendment may be executed by portable document format (pdf) or facsimile signature which signature shall be binding on the parties hereto.


 


WHEREAS, the parties have executed this Amendment effective as of December 31, 2010.


 


EXECUTIVE                                                                                     TESCO CORPORATION







JAMES A. LANK












/s/ James A. Lank                                                      By: /s/ Julio M. Quintana                                                      


James A. Lank                                                                                                Julio M. Quintana


President and CEO






  





1