alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                          EXHIBIT 10.(iv)(D)(10)


                      MONTGOMERY WARD & CO., INCORPORATED

                               Fourth Amendment
                                    to the
                      Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated
                           Retirement Security Plan

     WHEREAS, Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated, an Illinois corporation
("Ward"), maintains the Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated Retirement Security
Plan ("Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.1 Power to Amend, the Benefit Plans
                                       --------------                   
Committee of Ward ("Committee") has reserved the power to amend the Plan; and

     WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the Plan.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended effective January 29, 1999 in the
following manner:

     1.  Subsection 11.2 (f) Lump Sum Window Benefit, Section 11.9 Election to
                             -----------------------               -----------
Change Method of Payment and Section 12.4 Election to Change Method of Payment
------------------------                  ------------------------------------
are amended by deleting the reference to "January 31, 1999" wherever it appears
in said sections and by substituting therefor "February 20, 1999."

     2.  In  all other respects, the Plan, as amended, shall continue in full
force and effect.



                         MONTGOMERY WARD & CO., INCORPORATED


                         By: /s/ Philip Dobias
                             --------------------------------------
 
                         Its: VP Comp, Benefits and HR Strategy
                              -------------------------------------

ATTEST:

By: /s/ Jill M. Chapman
    --------------------------
 
Its: Benefits Director
     -------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Election Assistance Commission

# AGENCY:

U.S. Election Assistance Commission. 

# ACTION:

Notice of public hearing agenda. 

# Date and Time:

Tuesday, March 17, 2009, 1-3 p.m. 

# Place:

U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave, NW., Suite 150, Washington, DC 20005 (Metro Stop: Metro Center). 

      ( print page 9605)    

# Agenda:

The Commission will receive presentations on the following topic: Voter Registration Databases: Initial Discussion on Reviewing HAVA Mandated Guidance. 

This hearing will be open to the public. 

# Person to Contact for Information:

Bryan Whitener. Telephone: (202) 566-3100. 

Alice Miller, 

Chief Operating Officer, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-4760 Filed 3-3-09; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P
No. 09-831.

#### Joni Mihelich, Petitioner v. Active Plumbing Supply Co.

559 U.S. 973, 130 S. Ct. 1713,

176 L. Ed. 2d 184,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2174.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County, denied.
# C_2016089EN.01000601.xml

| 5.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/6

---

Adoption of Commission Decision on the notification by the Kingdom of Spain of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32(6) of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions

(2016/C 89/07)

On 3 March 2016, the Commission adopted Decision C(2016) 1241 on the notification by the Kingdom of Spain of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32(6) of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (1).

1

This document is available on the following internet site: https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/36205e98-8e7a-47d7-808d-931bc5baf6ee

---

(1)  OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17.

1

---
FIRST AMENDMENT TO


SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE







This First Amendment to Secured Promissory Note (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 22nd day of February, 2011 by and between General Cannabis, Inc. (f/k/a LC Luxuries Limited), a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and Justin Hartfield, an individual (the “Holder”).







RECITALS







WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder are parties to that certain Secured Promissory Note dated as of November 19, 2010 in the original principal amount of $900,000.00 (the “Original Agreement”);







WHEREAS, the Maturity Date set forth in the Original Agreement was January 10, 2012;







WHEREAS, both the Company and the Holder desire to amend the terms of the Original Agreement to change the Maturity Date as set forth herein.







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein contained, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:







1.           The Maturity Date as set forth in the Original Agreement shall be changed to June 30, 2012.







2.           Other than as set forth herein, the terms and conditions of Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first written above.








	
“Company”

	 	
“Holder”


	  	 	  
	
General Cannabis, Inc.,

	 	  
	
a Nevada corporation

	 	  
	  	 	  
	
/s/  James Pakulis

	 	
/s/  Justin Hartfield


	
By:

	
James Pakulis

	 	
By:

	
Justin Hartfield


	
Its:

	
CEO
No. 09-9504.

#### Marty Dale Williams, Petitioner v. Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General of Tennessee.

559 U.S. 1079, 130 S. Ct. 2116,

176 L. Ed. 2d 742,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3464.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Office *of the* Director *of*  National Intelligence
 
 
 HOME GLOBAL TRENDS REPORT FIVE-YEAR REGIONAL OUTLOOKS  | DEEPER LOOKS MEDIA & DOWNLOADS
 Print
			
		
	
	
		
								Menu Show/Hide
INTRODUCTION
Foreword
Key Themes
Executive Summary
The COVID Factor: Expanding Uncertainty
STRUCTURAL FORCES
Structural Forces: Setting the Parameters
Demographics and Human Development
Future Global Health Challenges
Environment
Economics
Technology
EMERGING DYNAMICS
Emerging Dynamics: Societal, State, and International
Societal: Disillusioned, Informed, and Divided
State: Tensions, Turbulence, and Transformation
International: More Contested, Uncertain, and Conflict Prone
The Future of Terrorism: Diverse Actors, Fraying International Efforts
SCENARIOS FOR 2040
Scenarios for 2040: Charting the Future Amid Uncertainty
Renaissance of Democracies
A World Adrift
Competitive Coexistence
Separate Silos
Tragedy and Mobilization
REGIONAL FORECASTS
20-year Projections
Latin America
Europe
Russia and Eurasia
Middle East & North Africa
Sub-Saharan Africa
South Asia
North East Asia
South East Asia
Oceania
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Acknowledgements
**REGIONAL FORECASTS**
LATIN AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN
*(LATIN AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN - Click image to enlarge)*
 Officeof the DirectorofNational Intelligence


Contact ODNI

          ODNI Centers
National Counterterrorism CenterNational Counterintelligence and Security CenterNational Counterproliferation and Biosecurity CenterCyber Threat Intelligence Integration CenterForeign Malign Influence Center

           Oversight
Equal Employment OpportunityIC Inspector GeneralIC Diversity Equity Inclusion and AccessibilityCivil Liberties, Privacy, and TransparencyOffice of General CounselMore Offices

          Information
IC IG HotlineNo FEAR ActPrivacy PolicyCustomer ServiceAccessibilityFOIASystem of Record Notices

          Useful Links
For KidsReady.govOpen.govFlu.govPlain Language ActODNI Operating StatusCoronavirus Disease GuidanceAdobe Acrobat Reader
exv10w20






Exhibit 10.20




2011 CEO Compensation Program



To create a compensation program that reflects a comprehensive view of company performance. The
Program reflects a combination of success factors, including: Primary Financial Goals and Other
Performance Measures. The Program should be adjusted on an annual basis and compensation should be
paid based on the achievement of certain factors.




The 2011 Success Factors:



Primary Financial Goals:





	     1.	 	Achieving pre-tax net income for 2011 for CapitalSource Bank of $150 million.






	     2.	 	Achieving new funded originations during 2011 of $1.8 billion. Achievement of this
target will be measured by reaching both the funded amount set forth in the targets (which
will include any loans that fund within 60 days of closings) and hitting the blended
spreads set forth in the targets as set forth in the CapitalSource Bank Forecast presented
at the CapitalSource Bank February 2011 Board Meeting. For the satisfaction of the blended
spread target, consideration will be given to any originations funded over and above the
targeted amounts at lower spreads.






	     3.	 	Experiencing during 2011 less than 0.5% of credit losses (charge offs or specific
reserves) for 2010 vintage originations and 0.25% for 2011 vintage originations. For
purposes of losses on portfolio acquisitions, only losses in excess of the purchase
discount will be counted as credit losses.




Other Performance Measures:





	     4.	 	Achieving the budgeted Parent Company operating expense levels per the 2011 Parent
Company budget to be formally approved by the Board of Directors at the April 2011 Board
Meeting.






	     5.	 	Converting CapitalSource Bank’s Charter from an Industrial Loan Corporation to a
Commercial Bank or continuing to make significant progress toward such a conversion as
determined by the Board of Directors.






	     6.	 	Continuing to reduce the level of Parent Company assets through a focus on reducing the
level of Classified Assets.






	     7.	 	Continuing to simplify the overall operating structure of the Parent Company through
continued movement of employees into CapitalSource Bank and simplifying the management
structure (to the extent permitted by regulators).














 











Bonus Targets



The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors may use its discretion to adjust — up or down
— the following bonus targets and to determine whether the success factors have been achieved to
the extent there are judgments to be employed or mitigating factors exist:



To achieve Bonus at or above 100% of Base Salary:





	     •	 	All of the 3 Primary Financial Goals and at least 3 of the 4 Other Performance Measures.




To achieve Bonus at or above 75% of Base Salary:





	     •	 	At least 2 of the 3 Primary Financial Goals and at least 2 of the 4 Other Performance
Measures.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-2222

MICHELLE L. REAGAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GORDON R. ENGLAND, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Navy, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA02-373-JFM) Submitted: March 28, 2003 Decided: March 24, 2004 Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David H. Shapiro, Richard L. Swick, SWICK & SHAPIRO, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Thomas M. DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Kristine L. Sendek-Smith, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Michelle L. Reagan appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of her former employer in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the district court’s order, and the joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Reagan v. England , No. CA-02-373-JFM (D. Md. filed Sept. 4, 2002, and entered Sept. 5, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE
PERIOD DECEMBER 31, 1995.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,109,678
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  589,878
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,699,556
<PP&E>                                      17,104,812
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,110,733
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,693,635
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,981
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,675,654
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,693,635
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,703,705
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,046,106
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,657,599
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 09-8375.

#### Peter J. Schultz, Petitioner v. Francis Halpin, et al.

559 U.S. 990, 130 S. Ct. 1754,

176 L. Ed. 2d 211,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2228.

March 8, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until March 29, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
CARDIORENTIS AG v. IQVIA LTD. and Iqvia RDS, Inc.

168A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2019

J. Dickson Phillips, III, Attorney at Law, Jonathan C. Krisko, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Cardiorentis AG

Charles F. Marshall, III, Attorney at Law, Shepard D. O'Connell, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Iqvia Ltd. and Iqvia RDS, Inc.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of May 2019 by Defendants to admit Michael Joseph Klisch Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."
No. 09-9589.

#### Paul Richard Butts, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1081, 130 S. Ct. 2123,

176 L. Ed. 2d 746,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3119.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 850.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Terra Nostra Technology Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Regis Bosse, President and acting CFO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: November 12, 2003 | By: /s/ Regis BosseName: Regis BosseTitle: President and Acting CFO
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the annual report of Novellus Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard S. Hill, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350
of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.



|                        |  |     |  |                                                               
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 24, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard S. Hill                                           
|                        |  |     |  | Richard S. Hill                                               
|                        |  |     |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
No. 09-862.

#### John Anthony Magyar, Petitioner v. Mississippi.

560 U.S. 903, 130 S. Ct. 3274,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1182,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3999,

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.

Same case below, 18 So. 3d 807.
EX-31.1 12 dex311.htm CERTIFICATION OF CEO
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

I, Louis Paulsen, Chief Executive Officer of Alpha Nutraceuticals, Inc.,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alpha Nutraceuticals,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financing reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date: March 29, 2004

/s/ LOUIS PAULSEN

Louis Paulsen,
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I,
Thomas G. Tachovsky, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of Entropin, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:



(a)    the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(b)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: March 30, 2004
|                      | 
|By:                   |  | /s/ THOMAS G. TACHOVSKY, PH.D.       
|                      |  |                                      
|                      |  | Thomas G. Tachovsky, Ph.D.           
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 09-9960.

#### Eusebio Escobar de Jesus, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1114, 130 S. Ct. 2424,

176 L. Ed. 2d 937,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3680,

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.