alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Senior Judge Butzner did not participate in consideration of

this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1438

DALLAS R. HORN,

Petitioner,

versus

ISLAND CREEK COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(No. 96-681-BLA)

Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 19, 1997

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,* Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Dallas R. Horn, Petitioner Pro Se. Douglas Allan Smoot, JACKSON &

KELLY, Charleston, West Virginia; Michelle Seyman Gerdano, Patricia

May Nece, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for

Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision

and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black

lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.

1996). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision

is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Horn v.

Island Creek Coal Co., No. 96-681-BLA (BRB Feb. 26, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 09-176.

#### Lea Lakeside-Scott, Petitioner v. Multnomah County, Oregon, et al.

559 U.S. 1067, 130 S. Ct. 2089,

176 L. Ed. 2d 721,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3348.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 556 F.3d 797.
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) 

Analysis of FY 2010 Service Contract Inventories 

Background: DNFSB is a small, independent agency (operating at 103 Full-time Equivalents 

(FTEs) in FY 2010) with responsibility for the oversight of the Department of Energy (DOE)’s 

defense nuclear facilities located throughout the United States. DNFSB’s mission as described 

by the Atomic Energy Act is to ensure that the public health and safety are adequately protected 

at the DOE defense nuclear facilities. Over 60% of DNFSB’s are engineers or scientists directly 

supporting its mission. DNFSB has a small administrative support staff responsible for the full 

range of administrative support functions, of whom approximately 1.5 FTEs perform 

procurement (e.g., 1102) duties. DNFSB’s total obligations for supplies and services in FY 2010 

were less than $4M. 

The analysis was performed by DNFSB’s senior Contracting Officer and has been concurred 

with by the Senior Procurement Executive and Chief Human Capital Officer. 

Special Interest Functions Studied: DNFSB studied special interest function Engineering and 

Technical Services (R425), under which $582,043 was obligated, which represented 18% of total 

obligations. The only other special interest function with FY 2010 obligations (Policy 

Review/Development Services) was not studied as it represented only 3% of total obligations. 

Methodology Used to Support the Analysis: As the special interest function only consisted of 

five (5) contracts, members of the acquisition workforce working on all contracts were 

interviewed. 

Agency Findings: 

1) DNFSB has no personal services contract obligations. 

2) A review of the special interest function contracts indicated none of the work performed 

was closely associated with inherently governmental functions, and thus no special 

management attention was necessary. 

3) A review of the special interest function contracts indicated that DNFSB was not using 

contractor employees to perform inherently governmental functions. 

4) DNFSB has specific safeguards in place to ensure that the work being performed by 

contractors under this special interest function has not changed or expanded during 

performance to become an inherently governmental function (e.g., the Contracting 

Officer reviews all deliverables). 

5) A review of the special interest function contracts indicated that DNFSB is not using 

contractor employees to perform critical functions in such a way that could affect the 

ability of the agency to maintain control of its mission and operations. 

6) There are sufficient internal agency resources to manage and oversee contracts 

effectively. 

Explanation of Action Taken or Planned to Resolve Identified Weaknesses: NA, no 

weaknesses identified.
No. 09-10213.

#### In re Charles D. Minor, Petitioner.

560 U.S. 902, 130 S. Ct. 3312,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1181,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3938.

May 17, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until June 7, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
STATE of North Carolina, v. Hector TREVINO, III.

No. COA18-741

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 21, 2019

NO PREJUDICIAL ERROR.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5183]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,972]


Risdon International, Laconia, NH; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on January 22, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Risdon 
International, Laconia, New Hampshire.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of February 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-5183 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

The undersigned officer of the registranthereby certifies, to hisknowledge, that theregistrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended September 30, 2010 fully complies, in all materialrespects, with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and all information contained in such report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the registrant’s financial condition and results ofoperations.

| Date:      November 15, 2010 |                                                                               |
|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |                                                                               |
|                              |   /s/ Jinyuan      Li                                                         |
|                              |                                                                               |
|                              | Jinyuan Li                                                                         |
|                              | Chief Executive Officer, President      and Acting ChiefFinancial      Officer     |
|                              | (Principal Executive Officer,      Principal Financial andAccounting      Officer) |

----
Elizabeth M. T. O'NAN, an Individual, Plaintiff, v. NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation; ServPro Industries, Inc., a Corporation; ServPro of Marion, a Corporation, aka ServPro of Asheville East, aka ServPro of Asheville West, aka ServPro of McDowell and Rutherford Counties, aka J. L. Kuder Enterprises, a Corporation, John Kuder, an Individual, Linda Kuder, an Individual, Spencer Gates, an Individual, Debra Whittemore, an Individual, Jennifer Robinson, an Individual and Lisa Tilley, an Individual, Defendants.

No. COA18-990

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 21, 2019

DISMISSED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5117 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5117

   To exempt persons with disabilities from the prohibition against 
       providing section 8 rental assistance to college students.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2006

 Ms. Pryce of Ohio (for herself, Mr. Hobson, Mr. Tiberi, Mr. Ney, and 
  Mr. Leach) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To exempt persons with disabilities from the prohibition against 
       providing section 8 rental assistance to college students.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES FROM SECTION 8 RENTAL 
              ASSISTANCE PROHIBITION.

    Subsection (a) of section 327 of Public Law 109-115 (119 Stat. 
2466) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (7); and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(6) is not a person with disabilities, as such term is 
        defined in section 3(b)(3)(E) of the United States Housing Act 
        of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437a(b)(3)(E)); and''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 09-8971.

#### Daniel Jon Peterka, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

559 U.S. 1052, 130 S. Ct. 2349,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2945.

176 L. Ed. 2d 568,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before April 8, 2009, to be assured of consideration. 

## Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) 

*OMB Number:*                     1505-XXXX.                 

*Type of Review:*                     New information collection activity.                 

*Title:*                     Generic Clearance for Customer Satisfaction Surveys.                 

*Description:*                     The TIGTA's Office of Audit's mission is to provide independent oversight of IRS activities. Through its audit programs TIGTA promotes efficiency and effectiveness in the administration of internal revenue laws, including the prevention and detection of fraud, waste, and abuse affecting tax administration. To accomplish this, TIGTA Office of Audit at times finds it necessary to contact a limited number of taxpayers (including businesses) for various reasons, including to survey or contact taxpayers on issues such as customer service, for example, to determine the quality of service at IRS walk-in sites called TACs, telephones, during examinations (IRS audits of taxpayer tax returns), to survey or contact taxpayers to determine why certain eligible taxpayers did or did not take certain actions, and to survey or contact taxpayers to determine the accuracy of the IRS records.                 

*Respondents:*                     Individuals or households.                 

*Estimated Total Reporting Burden:*                     2,500 hours.                 

*Clearance Officer:*                     Kimberly Hyatt, Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,  Washington, DC 20220, (202) 622-5913.                 

*OMB Reviewer:*                     OIRA Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503                     *oira_submission@omb.eop.gov.*

Robert Dahl, 

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer. 

 [FR Doc. E9-4833 Filed 3-6-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810-25-P
John F. STOWERS and Wife Susan Edward Stowers, Plaintiffs, v. Michael J. PARKER, Julie A. Parker and Parker and Parker, a General Partnership, Defendants.

No. COA18-737

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 16, 2019

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 33.18



LOGO

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONS REGULATION AB SERVICING
CRITERIA

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2018, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo
Bank N.A.(the Servicer).

National Tax Search, LLC (NTS) is responsible for assessing compliance as
of December 31, 2018 and for the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations
(the CFR). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122 (d)(2)(v),
1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of
the Servicer using NTSs TaxQ system (the Platform Transactions).

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2018 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
Transactions taken as a whole.

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2018 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer



LOGO

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO

January 25, 2019

130 S. Jefferson Street

Suite300

Chicago, IL 60661
No. 09-150.

#### Michigan, Petitioner v. Richard Perry Bryant.

559 U.S. 1065, 130 S. Ct. 2138,

176 L. Ed. 2d 719,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3456.

April 19, 2010.

Motion of respondent for appointment of counsel granted. Peter Jon Van Hoek, Esquire, of Detroit, Michigan, is appointed to serve as counsel for the respondent in this case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         965,240
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  627,255
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,177,847
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,093,698
<PP&E>                                         168,535
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,852,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          182,185
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,859,430
<OTHER-SE>                                   (210,197)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,852,079
<SALES>                                      4,397,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,397,939
<CGS>                                        2,443,406
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,065,350
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (72,574)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (18,262)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (54,312)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (54,312)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)




</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          41,589
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,598
<ALLOWANCES>                                   135,256
<INVENTORY>                                     20,351
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,137
<PP&E>                                         145,228
<DEPRECIATION>                                  92,290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 798,310
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          568,016
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,799
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,579
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,239,478
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   798,310
<SALES>                                        527,915
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               527,915
<CGS>                                          102,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  342,356
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               726,448
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               135,256
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             121,897
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (520,117)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (520,117)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (6,964)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (527,081)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)


</TABLE>
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Donna Haytko-Paoa <dhp@hawaii.edu> 

Tuesday, December 10, 2013 6:53 PM 

EAS (OST) 

Support for Mokulele Airlines -Kalaupapa Service Bid 

.·.:; 

' ~ 

... ':-.:.. 

Aloha. I am writing this email in support of Mokulele Airlines even though I realize that the deadline for 

comment has passed. I just wanted you to know the Mokulele Airlines has been a Godsend ever since Island 

Air cut way back on their service to Molokai. Island Air was the way in which our staff and instructors 

commuted back and forth to Kahului for meetings at the main campus of UH Maui College. Many of us also 

counted on Island Air for our personal and business trips to the island of Oahu. 

As Island Air chose to focus on providing service for the tourists to Lanai island, it was Mokulele Airlines that 

stepped in to meet the Molokai residents needs. Mokulele has provided consistent, reliable, and necessary 

service. I expect that they will do so for Kalaupapa as well if they should win the bid. 

I am submitting this as a personal view which does not represent the University of Hawaii or the State of 

Hawaii. However, I am signing with my title to verify that I work for UH and as such, have a good deal of 

experience in inter-island air travel. Mahalo and aloha. 

Donna Haytko-Paoa 

Professor/Coordinator 

UH Maui College, Molokai 

1
EXHIBIT 10.1





FIRST AMENDMENT TO


ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC.


2002 BONUS PLAN





The ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC. 2002 BONUS PLAN (the Plan) is hereby amended as
follows:





1. The first sentence of Section III of the Plan is amended and restated, effective June 29, 2002, to
read as follows:





All regular full-time and part-time employees of the Company and its subsidiaries scheduled to
work 20 or more hours per week in salary grades 7E and above are eligible to participate in the Plan.





2. The
first sentence of Section III of the Plan shall be amended and restated, effective January 1, 2003, to read as follows:





All regular full-time and part-time employees of the Company and its subsidiaries scheduled to work 20 or more hours per week in salary grades 6E and above (in the United States and Puerto Rico) and 7E and above (outside of the
United States and Puerto Rico) are eligible to participate in the Plan.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Advanced Medical
Optics, Inc. hereby executes this First Amendment on the 8th day of October, 2002.





ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC.





BY:   /s/ Aimee S. Weisner


-


Aimee S. Weisner


Corporate Vice President,


General Counsel and Secretary