alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C.
20549

FORM 10-QSB/A

[ X ] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended October 31, 2005

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE
ACT

For the transition period from __________to ____________

Commission file number 000-49995

Argentex Mining
Corporation(Exact name of small business issuer as specified
in its charter)

|Nevada                                                               | 71-0867623                          
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
      organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Suite 2300, 1066 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British
Columbia Canada V6E 3X2(Address of principal executive
offices)

604.601.8336(Issuers telephone
number)

Not Applicable(Former name, former address and
former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Check whether the issuer: (1)
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange
Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [   ]

Check whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [   ] No [X]

Explanatory Note: This amendment to our Form 10-QSB for the
  quarterly period ended October 31, 2005 has been filed in order to reflect that
  our company was not, during the period in question, a shell company (as defined
  in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Accordingly, we have removed the X
  from the box Yes in the item immediately above this Explanatory
  Note and we have inserted an X in the box marked No.

---

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the
  registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
  thereunto duly authorized.

|By:                                        | /s/
      Kenneth Hicks | 
|------------------------------------------ | ----------------------- | 
|Kenneth Hicks                              |                        
|President and Director                     |                        
|(Principal Executive Officer)              |                        
|Date: April 8, 2008                        |                        
|                                           |                         | 
|                                           |                         | 
|                                           |                         | 
|By:                                        | /s/
      Hamish Malkin | 
|Hamish Malkin                              |                        
|Chief Financial Officer                    |                        
|(Principal Financial Officer and Principal |                        
|Accounting Officer)                        |                        
|Date: April 8, 2008                        |                        

---
CERTIFICATIONS
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

      I, Fred B. Zaziski, certify that:

      1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form  10-QSB/A  of Falcon
Natural Gas Corp.

      2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not  contain any
untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary
to make the  statements  made,  in light of the  circumstances  under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

      3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

      4. The registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have;

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal  control
over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the  period  covered by this
quarterly  report  that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,  based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial  reporting,  to
the  registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee of  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weakness  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

      Date: January 23, 2006              /s/ Fred B. Zaziski
                                          ------------------------
                                          Fred B. Zaziski
                                          Principal Executive Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.2 FIRST AMENDMENT
TO
ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC.
2002 INTERNATIONAL STOCK PURCHASE PLAN The ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC. 2002 International Stock Purchase Plan
(the Plan) is hereby amended as follows: 1. Section 1.2(t) of the Plan is amended and restated as follows:  (t)   Offering Period shall have the following meaning:  (i)
    
    During the period commencing
on or after the date of adoption of the Plan and
ending on October 1, 2004, Offering Period
means each six-month period commencing on any
April 1 and October 1; provided, however, that,
on a one-time basis, the Offering Period
commencing October 1, 2004 shall end on April 30,
2005.(ii)
    
    After April 30, 2005,
Offering Period means each six-month period
commencing on any May 1 and November 1.  Options shall be granted on the Date of Grant and exercised
on the Date of Exercise, as provided in Section 3.1(a) and
3.2(a), respectively. 2. This First Amendment shall be effective as of August 15, 2004. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. hereby executes this
First Amendment to the Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase
Plan on this 12th day of October, 2004. ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC. BY:
    
    /s/ AIMEE S. WEISNER
Aimee S. Weisner
Corporate Vice President, General
  Counsel and Secretary
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the annual report of Patriot Scientific Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended May 31, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an
      exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of Patriot Scientific
      Corporation does hereby certify, pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
      and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
      18
      of the United States Code 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
              October 13,
              2006/s/ Thomas
              J.
              SweeneyThomas
              J. Sweeney*Chief
                Financial Officer*
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of XRG, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB (the "Report") for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Kevin Brennan, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Kevin Brennan
-------------------------
Kevin Brennan
Chief Executive Officer
February 19, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [WY-923-1310-FI; WYW173883] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas lease. 

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement from Kodiak Oil & Gas (USA) Inc., and O'Neal Resources Corporation for Competitive oil and gas lease WYW173883 for land in Sweetwater County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Julie L. Weaver, Acting Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessees have agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessees have paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessees have met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease WYW173883 effective August 1, 2008, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the lands.                 

Julie L. Weaver, 

Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication. 

 [FR Doc. E9-5035 Filed 3-9-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30437

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OSCAR WILLARD JOHNSON, III,

DefendantAppellant.

--------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 00-CV-3772-S

99-CR-374-ALL-S

---------------------------------------------------------

June 21, 2002

Before SMITH, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Oscar Willard Johnson argues that the district court erred in dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255

motion and in failing to grant him an out-of-time direct appeal. Johnson argues that his counsel failed

to file a direct appeal despite his request that counsel do so.

“[A] lawyer who disregards specific instructions from the defendant to file a notice of appeal

acts in a manner that is professionally unreasonable.” R oe v. Flores-Ortega , 528 U.S. 470, 477

(2000). If co unsel fails to file a requested appeal, a defendant is entitled to a new appeal without-2-

showing that his appeal would have merit because he reasonably relied on counsel to file the

necessary notice. Id

.

The district court rejected Johnson’s allegation that he had instructed his counsel to file an

appeal. However, the record does not contain an affidavit from counsel o r any other independent

evidence showing that Johnson did not make such a request or clarifying the nature of any discussions

Johnson had with his counsel. Thus, the record does not conclusively show that Johnson was not

entitled to an out-of-time appeal.

The district court abused its discretion in denying Johnson’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion without

obtaining evidence on whether Johnson was deprived of his right to a direct appeal as a result of the

ineffective assistance of counsel. S ee United States v. Bartholomew

, 974 F.2d 39, 41 (5th Cir. 1992).

The dismissal of the motion is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the district court to obtain

the evidence necessary to resolve this issue.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
No. 09-9241.

#### Devon Mitchell, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1043, 130 S. Ct. 2077,

176 L. Ed. 2d 425,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2800.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 346 Fed. Appx. 281.
****************************** 

 * MONOGRAPH: MCW/LRP 05 

 ****************************** 

ITEM: Spice Oriental Chicken with Rice, Cooked, Dehydrated (OCD) 

 (170 gm brick pack) 

NSN: 8940-01-467-2207 ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR-C-026 

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE: 603 Kilocalories (PRIMARY) 

 

DEHYDRATED CHARACTERISTICS: 

APPEARANCE: Powdered tan/brown colored sauce mixture, beige to tan diced chicken 

pieces (natural proportion color), short grain rice with smooth surface, diced/pieces 

 red pepper, peanut halves/whole, diced/pieces green beans, sliced water chestnuts 

 sliced/pieces mushrooms. 

ODOR: Oriental spices, chicken, rice, Oriental style sauce, vegetables 

FLAVOR: Chicken, rice, salty, Oriental spices, mild vegetables. 

TEXTURE: Powdery sauce mixture, dry brittle components*, very dry mouth-feel. 

 

REHYDRATED CHARACTERISTICS: 

APPEARANCE: Tan/brown Oriental sauce, beige to tan diced chicken pieces 

 (natural proportion color), cream colored short grain rice, dice/pieces red pepper 

and, peanut halves/whole, diced/pieces green beans, sliced water chestnuts sliced/pieces 

mushrooms. 

ODOR: Cooked chicken, rice, vegetables, Oriental style sauce, mild seasoning, 

 

FLAVOR: Spicy, moderate heat, Oriental spices, mild vegetable, cooked chicken and rice. 

TEXTURE: Moist tender chicken, soft – slightly firm rice, crunchy water chestnuts, 

slightly soft – firm vegetables, crunchy peanuts, and moderately thick sauce. 

DEFECTS LIKELY TO OCCUR: 

APPEARANCE: Dehydrated and rehydrated: Darkening or loss of color of sauce, rice, 

chicken and vegetables. 

 

ODOR: Dehydrated and Rehydrated: Cardboard, oxidized, stale, rancid, scorched, burnt, 

old fowl. 
 FLAVOR: Dehydrated and rehydrated: Cardboard, oxidized, rancid, scorched, burnt, loss 

of spice, old fowl, starchy. 

TEXTURE: Dehydrated: Very hard, tacky components. Rehydrated: Unrehydrated 

product, chewy, dry chicken, excess water. 

*SPECIAL NOTES: Some ingredients such as rice, pasta or bacon may not be freeze 

dehydrated and will not easily crush to powder.
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp., (the“Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”) as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mary Jane Robertson, Executive Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asenacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.       Dated: July 29, 2005 By:/s/   *Mary Jane Robertson*     Mary Jane Robertson
No. 09-9760.

#### Jerome John Loew, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1085, 130 S. Ct. 2136,

176 L. Ed. 2d 754,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3126.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 593 F.3d 1136 and 364 Fed. Appx. 333.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quinton Cardiology Systems
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ruediger
Naumann-Etienne, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                        By:   /s/    Ruediger Naumann-Etienne
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Ruediger Naumann-Etienne
                                            Chief Executive Officer

Date:  August 14, 2002
Amendment No. 3 to the
License Agreement for Commercial Use of MySQL® Software
   1.
 2.
 3
 (a) distribute Licensed Software as part of Products from
January 1, 2011 through June 30, 2014
    
    $
    ***
 4.
  5. Miscellaneous
  MySQL Americas, Inc.
    
    
    
    Sourcefire, Inc.By: /s/ Joe Pendleton
    
    
    
    By: /s/ Todd P. HeadleyName: Joe Pendleton
    
    
    
    Name: Todd P. HeadleyTitle: Director NA OEM Sales, MySQL
    
    
    
    Title: CFODate: September 1, 2009
    
    
    
    Date: August 31, 2009
ODNI Approved for Release
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 7, 2009

s0430 

# Order

May 7, 2009

137552 & (40)(41)

DEPARTMENT OF AG RICULTURE and MICHIGAN APPLE COMMITTEE, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 137552 COA: 277743 Kent CC: 05-011315-CZ APPLETREE MARKETING, L.L.C. and STEVEN KROPF, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motions for leave to file briefs amicus curiae are GRANTED. The application fo r leave to appeal the September 16, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it is GRANTED. The par ties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the plaintiffs may simultane ously pursue claims against Appletree Marketing, LLC for alleged violations of the Agricultural Commodities Marketing Act, MCL 290.651 et seq., and for common law fraud and statutory
conversion under MCL 600.2919 a; and (2) whether, under the circumstances of this case, the plaintiffs may pursue claims for co mmon law and statutor y conversion against Appletree’s principal, Steven Kropf.
#### William V. DeMorris III, Appellant, v Heide U. DeMorris, Respondent.

[719 NYS2d 593]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), dated January 20, 2000, which found him in contempt of court for willful failure to pay $34,000 pursuant to a prior order of the same court, dated January 30, 1998.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the contempt adjudication is vacated.

The contempt adjudication must be vacated because the appellant did not receive prior notice of the proceeding *(see,*Judiciary Law § 756; *Michael N.G. v Elsa R.,*233 AD2d 264). Further, there is no indication in the record that another means of enforcement less drastic than incarceration for contempt would be ineffectual *(see, Gadomski v Gadomski,*256 AD2d 675; *Snow v Snow,*209 AD2d 399).

We note that leave to appeal from a purported order of the same court, also dated January 20, 2000, was denied by decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 31, 2000. Therefore, that order is not properly before this Court.

The appellant’s remaining contention need not be addressed in light of our determination. Altman, J. P., Goldstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.