alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission 6730 Martin Way E., Olympia, Washington 98516-5540 Phone (360) 438-1180 www.nwifc.org FAX# 753-8659

Dennis Mclerran, Regional Administrator Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, WA 98101-3140



# DearAd~M£~ July 17, 2013

The Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission with it member tribes would like to offerourthanks for yourtimely letterofJune 21, 2013 to Ecology Director Maia Bellon regarding the adoption of revised human health criteria in state water quality standards. We particularly appreciate your documentation ofseveral important points-thatthere are scientifically sound regional and local data sufficient for Washington to move forward, thatthe current human health criteria are notsufficiently protective, and that EPA has the authorityto amend the human health criteria forWashington ifthe state's process is unnecessarily delayed. The recent efforts by industrial dischargers to delay the rule-making process via the Washington State Legislature have been astonishing. The request for another study offish consumption rates would have been an unnecessary use oftaxpayer money for several reasons. First ofall, Washington State already has scientifically defensible studies offish consumption among tribes and communities ofAsians and Pacific Islanders, as your letteraptly points out. Secondly, even ifsuch astudy were to be completed to document consumption by the so-called general population, Federal environmentaljustice guidelines require the use of human health criteria that accurately depict and protectfish consumption by tribes and other culturally or racially distinct communities. Finally, we note again thattribes are unique in their status as sovereign nations with treaty rights to the harvest and consumption of healthy fisheries resources, regardless ofstate-sponsored surveys. We greatly appreciate your effortsto getthe state moving on the adoption ofappropriate human health criteria in state water quality standards. Tribes have watched the continual delays and processes for several years, and it is time to hold the state to their own established timelines to get thejob done. We expectthe state to complete a draft rule by this winterwith accurate, protective human health criteria, and failing that, urge you to remain steadfast in your role as trustee oftribal treaty resources. Thank you.

cc: NWIFC Commissioners GovernorJay lnslee Sincerely,



# B~ Billy Frank,

# J r Chairman

Director Maia Bellon, Washington Department of Ecology
----

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                        |                   |                      |
|-----------------------------|------------------------|---------------------------|
|                        | STUDIO ONE MEDIA, INC. |
|                        |                   |                      |
| Date: October 15, 2013 | By:          | /s/  Preston J. Shea |
|                        | Preston J. Shea        |
|                        | President              |
Exhibit 32

Written Statement of Co-Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Co-Chief Executive Officers and the Chief Financial Officer of Regal Entertainment Group, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
each hereby certifies that, to his/her knowledge on the date hereof:



| |  | /s/MICHAEL L. CAMPBELLMichael L. Campbell
Co-Chief Executive Officer
August 10, 2004
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/KURT C. HALLKurt C. Hall
Co-Chief Executive Officer
August 10, 2004              
| |  | /s/AMY E. MILESAmy E. Miles
Chief Financial Officer
August 10, 2004                 

---



QuickLinks
11/09/2010 11:51 2022675075 OFFICE OF RULEMAKING 

t€RARTMENTOF 

HANSPORWION 

PAGE 03 

v..;^'^\ T OPERAFfONS Martin Galis 

130 Red Bluff Drive 

?ni0 NflV - 9 P j:| 3 Hickory Creek, TX 75065-3617 

November 2,2010 

Administrator J. Randolph Babbitt 

800 tDdependence Avenue, SW 

Room 1010 

Washington, DC 20591 

Re: Support flicse changes to the FAA's Fli^t Time/Duty Time NPRM 

Dear AdminJirtrator Babbin: 

As a US commercial pilot reviewing the FAA Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on Flight crew member 

Duty and Rest Requirernents I am pleased that the majority of the NPRM represents an improvement to current 

regulations and covers all commercial operations in the spirit of "One Level of Safety." However, there are some 

specific items that need to be changed in order to mitigate fadgue for the professional pilot 

1) The flight time limit should not be increased 25% from 8 hours to 10 hours. 

2) The augmented (3 person) flight time limit should not be increased 25% from 12 to 15 hours. 

3) Rest requirements should be 10 hour^ domestic and 14 hours intemational, 9 hours, reducible to S hours is<; not 

enough time to achieve restorative sleep, eat and attend to personal hygiene between duty periods. 

4) Domestic augmentation should not be allowed. 

As a professional commercial aviator working at high speed in congested airspace, and through arduous weather 

conditions, I can tell you that fatigue mitigation is paramount to improving the safety of the traveling public. The 

NTSB has held fatigue on its "Most Wanted List" for Ihirty years because it is a problem that flight crews deal with 

on a daily basis. This FAA NPRM will go a long way to reducing Mgue and increasing safety if these items are 

addressed. 

Sincerely, 

Martin O&lis 

130 Red Bluff Drive 

Hickory Creek, TX 75065 

940^97-»711
No. 09-7947.

#### Gerald C. Bakarich, Petitioner v. New Jersey.

559 U.S. 946, 130 S. Ct. 1518,

176 L. Ed. 2d 125,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1353,

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-25-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                      3,735,855
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,735,855
<CGS>                                        1,077,107
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,174,177
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,588,336
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             323,864
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             14,644,771
<INCOME-TAX>                                14,644,771
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,427,629
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             16,072,400
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                14,644,771
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.02
        

</TABLE>
First Amendment to the Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.46 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 THE PATRIOT COAL CORPORATION 

2007 LONG-TERM EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and stockholders of Patriot Coal Corporation (the “Company”) have adopted the Patriot Coal Corporation 2007 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”); 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Plan, a total of 5.2 million shares of the common stock,
par value $.01 per share, of the Company (the “Common Stock”) have been reserved for issuance under the Plan, as adjusted for the 2-for-1 stock split effected August 11, 2008 in the form of a 100% stock dividend; 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to increase the number of shares issuable under the Plan to 11.7 million shares, including shares
previously issued thereunder, and to extend the period during which awards may be granted under the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS,
Section 9.2 of the Plan permits the Company to amend the Plan from time to time, subject only to certain limitations specified therein; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the following amendments and modifications are hereby made a part of the Plan subject to, and effective as of the date of, the approval of shareholders of the Plan as amended at the
Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 13, 2010: 
 1.   Section 3.1 of the Plan shall be, and hereby is,
amended to increase the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock issuable thereunder to 11.7 million, after giving effect to the August 11, 2008 stock split, and the first sentence of such section is thereby to read as follows:

 “Subject to the provisions of Section 6.1 (relating to adjustment for changes in capital stock), an aggregate
number of eleven million seven hundred thousand (11,700,000) shares of Common Stock of the Company shall be available for issuance under the Plan”. 
 2.   Section 9.1 of the Plan shall be, and hereby is, amended to increase the period during which awards may be made under the Plan, and accordingly shall read as follows: 

“Unless the Plan is discontinued earlier by the Board as provided herein, no Award shall be granted hereunder on or after
May 13, 2020.” 
 3.   In all other respects, the Plan, as amended, is hereby ratified and confirmed and shall remain in
full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this First Amendment to the 2007 Long-Term Equity
Incentive Plan as of May 13, 2010. 
  

			
	PATRIOT COAL CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ Joseph W. Bean
	 Name:  

Its:
	 	 Joseph W. Bean

Senior Vice President – Law & Administration,
 General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Agreement to furnish instruments defining the rights of holders



 Exhibit 4(r) 
  

			
	



	  	 Kathryn A. Cassidy
 Senior Vice President
and GE Treasurer
  
 General Electric Company

3135 Easton Turnpike
 Fairfield, CT
06828


 Securities and Exchange Commission 
 100 F Street, NE 
 Washington, DC 20549 
 February 25, 2011 
 Subject: General Electric Company Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2010 – 
 File No. 001-00035 
 Dear Sirs: 
 Neither General Electric Company (the “Company”) nor any of its consolidated subsidiaries has
outstanding any instrument with respect to its long-term debt, other than those filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, under which the total amount of securities
authorized exceeds 10% of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. In accordance with paragraph (b)(4)(iii) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K (17 CFR Sec. 229.601), the Company hereby agrees to furnish to the
Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, a copy of each instrument that defines the rights of holders of such long term debt not filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. 
 Very truly yours, 
 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 
  

	
	 /s/ Kathryn A. Cassidy

	Kathryn A. Cassidy
	Senior Vice President and GE Treasurer
No. 09-8478.

#### Frederick L. Pitchford, Petitioner v. Southland Gaming and Racing, et al.

559 U.S. 982, 130 S. Ct. 1710,

176 L. Ed. 2d 197,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2113.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 333 Fed. Appx. 138.
STATE of North Carolina v. Daniel Jay SCOTT, Jr.

No. COA19-61

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 2, 2019

NO ERROR.
# C_2017337EN.01000101.xml

| 7.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8630 — Blackstone/MassMutual/Cambourne Life Investment/Rothesay)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 337/01)

On 2 October 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8630. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8630. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

132809 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

v SC: 132809 COA: 273282 Charlevoix CC: 05-001310-FH DARREN WILLIAM KASSUBA, 05-002610-FH Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 6, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

l0319 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 26, 2007

Clerk
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5061 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey Paint Bank National Fish 

Hatchery and Wytheville National Fish Hatchery to the State of Virginia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 30, 2006 

Mr. BOUCHER (for himself and Mr. GOODE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey Paint Bank 

National Fish Hatchery and Wytheville National Fish 

Hatchery to the State of Virginia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Paint Bank and 

5 Wytheville National Fish Hatcheries Conveyance Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF PAINT BANK AND WYTHEVILLE 

7 NATIONAL FISH HATCHERIES TO THE STATE 

8 OF VIRGINIA. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Within 180 days after the date 

10 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5061 IH 

1 shall convey to the State of Virginia without reimburse2 ment all right, title, and interest of the United States in 

3 and to the property described in subsection (b) for use 

4 by the Virginia Department of Fish and Game as part 

5 of the State of Virginia fish culture program. 

6 (b) PROPERTY DESCRIBED.—The property referred 

7 to in subsection (a) consists of— 

8 (1) the real property comprising Paint Bank 

9 National Fish Hatchery and Wytheville National 

10 Fish Hatchery, located at Paint Bank and 

11 Wytheville, Virginia, respectively, as described in the 

12 1982 Cooperative Agreement between the United 

13 States Fish and Wildlife Service and the State of 

14 Virginia; 

15 (2) all improvements and related personal prop16 erty under the control of the Secretary that is lo17 cated on that real property, including buildings, 

18 structures, and equipment; and 

19 (3) all easements, leases, and water rights relat20 ing to the property described in paragraphs (1) and 

21 (2). 

22 (c) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—If any of the prop23 erty conveyed to the State of Virginia under this section 

24 is used for any purpose other than the use authorized 

25 under subsection (a), all right, title, and interest in and 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5061 IH 

1 to all property conveyed under this section shall revert to 

2 the United States. The State of Virginia shall ensure that 

3 all property reverting to the United States under this sub4 section is in substantially the same or better condition as 

5 at the time of transfer to the State. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA DE LOS ANGELES ZENDEJAS,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-73400

Agency No. A095-447-695

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 19, 2010** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. 

Maria De Los Angeles Zendejas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from

an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for adjustment of

status. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo

FILED

NOV 01 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-73400

questions of law, and for substantial evidence the agency’s findings of fact. 

Blanco v. Mukasey, 518 F.3d 714, 718 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny in part and

dismiss in part the petition for review. 

Contrary to Zendejas’ assertion, the IJ did not violate due process by

admitting the documents presented by the Department of Homeland Security to

show Zendejas had made a false claim to United States citizenship on June 23,

1999, because the documents were probative and their admission was

fundamentally fair. See Espinoza v. INS, 45 F.3d 308, 310 (9th Cir. 1995). 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Zendejas is

inadmissible, and therefore ineligible for adjustment of status, where the record

indicates she made a false claim to United States citizenship to gain entry to the

United States in 1999. See Pichardo v. INS, 216 F.3d 1198, 1201 (9th Cir. 2000)

(false claim to United States citizenship is a “non-waivable ground of

inadmissibility” under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(ii)).

We lack jurisdiction to review Zendejas’ challenge to her 1999 expedited

removal order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(A); Avendano-Ramirez v. Ashcroft, 365

F.3d 813, 818-19 (9th Cir. 2004). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 22

- 00449

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 17th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 017

- 325129

- 21

Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J., and Walker, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### R

ABI 

### A DELEKE 

### , Appellant

V



### . G UNNS 

### R ESTORATION 

### , I NC



### . , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGME N T
On November 1 4 , 2022, and December 8, 2022, we notified appellant, in

accordance with Texas R ule of A ppellate P rocedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless appellant paid the $205 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 44.3. Appellant ha s n ot done so. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b). Because appellant ha s not complied with a procedural requirement and the Texas Supreme Cou rt’s order of August 28, 2015, 1 we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f). Appellant must pay al l cost s of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: January 19, 2023

1 See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi

- District Litigation, Misc. Do cket No . 15

- 9 158 (Aug. 28, 2015) (listing courts of appeals’ fees).
UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Evaluation of the Intelligence Community Elements’ Use of Space 

Certified as a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility in the 

Continental United States 

(March 2024) The Office of the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) 

completed an evaluation pursuant to section 6607 of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2023 (division F of Public Law 117–263) on the utilization of space owned or sponsored by 

an Intelligence Community (IC) element, located in the continental United States, that is certified 

as a sensitive compartmented information facility under IC or Department of Defense policy.

The IC IG provided a report summarizing the results of the evaluation to the appropriate 

congressional intelligence committees and the Director of National Intelligence. This evaluation 

made one recommendation. 

For more information about the IC IG, please contact ICIG_PAO@odni.gov or visit the IC IG’s website: 

https://www.dni.gov/icig 

For career opportunities with the IC IG, please visit: 

https://www.dni.gov/careers

To report allegations of waste, fraud, or abuse, please contact the IC IG Hotline: 

IC IG Hotline 855-731-3260 

ICIGHOTLINE@odni.gov