alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Kenneth Hicks, President and a director of Argentex Mining Corporation (Principal Executive Officer), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Argentex Mining Corporation for the interim period ended April 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Argentex Mining Corporation

Dated:  July 14, 2007

 

/s/ Kenneth Hicks                                            

Kenneth Hicks

President and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Argentex Mining Corporation and will be retained by Argentex Mining Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4853]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Institute of Electrical and Electronics 
Engineers

    Notice is hereby given that, on February 9, 2009, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Institute of Electrical and 
Electronics Engineers (``IEEE'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, 34 new 
standards have been initiated and 9 existing standards are being 
revised. More detail regarding these changes can be found at http://standards.ieee.org/standardswire/sba/12-10-08.html and http://standards.ieee.org/standardswire/sba/01-30-09.html.
    On September 17, 2004, IEEE filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 64105).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 17, 
2008. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on December 11, 2008 (73 FR 75469).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
 [FR Doc. E9-4853 Filed 3-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
No. 09-9309.

#### Jerome Julius Brown, Petitioner v. State Capitol Office of the Governor, et al.

559 U.S. 1097, 130 S. Ct. 2381,

176 L. Ed. 2d 776,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3497.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 358 Fed. Appx. 186.
EXHIBIT 11

                         EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATIONS
                      (In Thousands Except Per Share Data)

                                                  1995      1994      1993
EARNING PER COMMON AND DILUTIVE
  COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE:
  Net Income                                    $28,990   $ 4,215   $ 2,452
  Shares:
  Weighted average number of common
      shares outstanding                         17,751    17,599    13,352
  Weighted average number of additional
      shares issuable for common stock
      equivalents (a)                               260       120
         Adjusted common shares                  18,011    17,719    13,352

EARNINGS PER SHARE                              $  1.61   $   .24   $   .18

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE ASSUMING
  FULL DILUTION:
  Net Income                                    $28,990     4,215   $ 2,452
  Shares:
  Weighted average number of common
      shares outstanding                         17,751    17,599    13,352

  Additional shares issuable for all
      dilutive common stock equivalents (a)         340       120
         Shares as adjusted for all dilutants    18,091    17,719    13,352

EARNINGS PER SHARE                              $  1.60   $   .24   $   .18

(a) Shares  issuable  were derived  using the  "Treasury  Stock  Method" for all
dilutive common stock equivalents.

                                       62
---

UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C.
20549

FORM 10-QSB/A

[ X ] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended July 31, 2006

[   ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from __________to ____________

Commission file number 000-49995

Argentex Mining
Corporation(Exact name of small business issuer as specified
in its charter)

|Nevada                                                               | 71-0867623                          
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
      organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Suite 2300, 1066 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British
Columbia Canada V6E 3X2
  (Address of principal executive offices)

604.601.8336(Issuers telephone number)

Not Applicable(Former name, former address and
former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Check whether the issuer: (1)
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange
Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [   ]

Check whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [   ] No [X]

Explanatory Note: This amendment to our Form 10-QSB for the
  quarterly period ended July 31, 2006 has been filed in order to reflect that
  our company was not, during the period in question, a shell company (as defined
  in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Accordingly, we have removed the X
  from the box Yes in the item immediately above this Explanatory
  Note and we have inserted an X in the box marked No.

---

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the
  registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
  thereunto duly authorized.

|By:                                        | /s/
      Kenneth Hicks | 
|------------------------------------------ | ----------------------- | 
|Kenneth Hicks                              |                        
|President and Director                     |                        
|(Principal Executive Officer)              |                        
|Date: April 8, 2008                        |                        
|                                           |                         | 
|                                           |                         | 
|                                           |                         | 
|By:                                        | /s/
      Hamish Malkin | 
|Hamish Malkin                              |                        
|Chief Financial Officer                    |                        
|(Principal Financial Officer and Principal |                        
|Accounting Officer)                        |                        
|Date: April 8, 2008                        |                        

---
No. 09-9233.

#### Luis Gonzalez and Maria Gonzalez, Petitioners v. Lynne Riddle, et al.

559 U.S. 1096, 130 S. Ct. 2377,

176 L. Ed. 2d 774,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3571,

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Obligations

% Total 

Obligations

Fixed 

Price Cost T&M/LH Other Competed

Not 

Competed Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Small 

Business SDB

8(a) 

Program VOSB SDVOSB HUBZone WOSB

 Special Interest Functions

B505 COST BENEFIT ANALYSES $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

D302 ADP SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

D307 AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEM SVCS $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

D310 ADP BACKUP AND SECURITY SERVICES $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

D314 ADP ACQUISITION SUP SVCS $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

R406 POLICY REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

R407 PROGRAM EVALUATION SERVICES $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

R408 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

R409 PROGRAM REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

R413 SPECIFICATIONS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

R414 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

R423 INTELLIGENCE SERVICES $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

R425 ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES $200,000 6% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 75% 0% 25% 87% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

R497 PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

R707 MGT SVCS/CONTRACT & PROCUREMENT SUP $0 0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

D301 IT FACILITY OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE $2,016,293 65% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 4% 5% 91% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0%

V299 RAIL PASSENGER SERVICES $125,000 4% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

D399 OTHER IT AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS $115,438 4% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 24% 0% 0% 0% 0%

D304 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND TRANSMISSION $140,000 4% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

R418 SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: LEGAL $93,780 3% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 65% 0% 35% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0%

R431 HUMAN RESOURCES SUPPORT (PROFESSIONAL) $92,913 3% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

R699 OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES $55,000 2% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

V302

TRANSPORTATION/TRAVEL/RELOCATIONRELOCATION: TRAVEL AGENT $30,401 1% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

R425 ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES

(as % of PSC obligations)

see above

Biggest Percentage of Obligations

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB): Service Contract Inventory Summary Report

Contract Type Analysis Competition Analysis Time of Obligation Analysis

(as % of PSC obligations) as % of PSC obligations (as % of PSC obligations)

Small Business Analysis
No. 09-722.

#### Harold Green, Petitioner v. Cleary Water, Sewer and Fire District.

559 U.S. 1102, 130 S. Ct. 2399,

176 L. Ed. 2d 787,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3492.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 971, 130 S. Ct. 1691, 176 L. Ed. 2d 181, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 2154.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly report of Zaldiva, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), We,
Robert B. Lees, President, and John A. Palmer, Jr., Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Dated: 1/28/04                       /s/Robert B. Lees
      ---------                      -----------------
                                     Robert B. Lees
                                     President

Dated: 1/28/04                       /s/John A. Palmer, Jr.
      ---------                      ----------------------
                                     John A. Palmer, Jr.
                                     Treasurer
                                     Director
<PAGE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 22, 2016

s0615 

# Order

Clerk June 22, 2016

152745

SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA

INDIANS,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 152745

COA: 323136

Wayne CC: 12

- 016946

- CB

BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF

MICHIGAN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 20, 2015

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the

completion of the proceedings ordered by the Cour t of Appeals.

M ARKMAN , J., ( dissenting )

I would grant leave to appeal to consider whether the Court of Appeals erred by

concluding that material issues of fact remained in support of plaintiff’s claim of

fraudulent inducement and therefore reversing the trial court’s grant of summary

disposition in favor of defendant. Hamade v Sunoco, Inc (R&M) , 271 Mich App 145,

165

- 172 (2006); UAW

- GM Human Resource Ctr v KSL Recreation Corp , 228 Mich App

486, 502

- 507 (1998).
No. 09-9976.

#### Jason E. Branch, Sr., Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1115, 130 S. Ct. 2425,

176 L. Ed. 2d 938,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3737.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 591 F.3d 602.
No. 09-9088.

#### Otis Blaxton, Petitioner v. Florida.

559 U.S. 1075, 130 S. Ct. 2106,

176 L. Ed. 2d 735,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3350.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.

Same case below, 27 So. 3d 31.
No. 09-9318.

#### Troy Dewyon Drew, Petitioner v. Larry Mullins, et al.

559 U.S. 1108, 130 S. Ct. 2406,

176 L. Ed. 2d 926,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3830,

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
SAVINO v. The CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, et al.

18PA19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 30, 2019

Robert R. Marcus, Attorney at Law, Kimberly Sullivan, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Matthew Nis Leerberg, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, Brian M. Rowlson, Attorney at Law, Jonathan E. Schulz, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority d/b/a Carolinas Healthcare System and CMCNortheast.

R. Kent Brown, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Robert E. Zaytoun, Attorney at Law, Matthew D. Ballew, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Savino, Anthony Lawrence (The Estate of).

Jon Ryan Moore, Attorney at Law, Charlotte.

Paige L. Pahlke, Attorney at Law, Charlotte.

John R. Taylor, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

Matthew W. Krueger-Andes, Attorney at Law, Charlotte.

Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Trisha S. Pande, W. Ellis Boyle, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice

***Amended***

The following order has been entered on the Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant Briefs filed on the 29th of May 2019 by the Parties:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of May 2019."

Appellants shall have up to and including the 15th day of July 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.

Davis, J. recused
No. 09-9929.

#### McGhee Charles, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1113, 130 S. Ct. 2422,

176 L. Ed. 2d 936,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3797.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 09-768.

#### Robert D. Straley, Petitioner v. Utah Board of Pardons, et al.

559 U.S. 1102, 130 S. Ct. 2399,

176 L. Ed. 2d 787,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3653.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 991, 130 S. Ct. 1737, 176 L. Ed. 2d 213, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 2257.
No. 09-6682.

#### Richard Allen Hill, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1009, 130 S. Ct. 1878,

176 L. Ed. 2d 368,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2626.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 317 Fed. Appx. 910.
##### 



Exhibit 10.49
 AMENDED AND RESTATED
PLUMAS BANCORP 2001 STOCK OPTION PLAN
    1. DEFINITIONS.




---



##### 



2




---



##### 




  3




---



##### 



2. PLAN ADMINISTRATION.
 (a) Board of Directors/Committee
  (b) Committee Procedures
  4




---



##### 



(c) Board of Directors/Committee Responsibilities
             3. ELIGIBILITY FOR AN EQUITY AWARD.
 (a) General Rules
  5




---



##### 



(b) Ten-Percent Shareholders
  4. STOCK SUBJECT TO PLAN.
 (a) Basic Limitation
  (b) Additional Shares of Stock
  5. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF OPTIONS
 (a) Stock Option Agreement
  (b) Number of Shares of Stock
  6




---



##### 



(c) Exercise Price
  (d) Exercisability
    (e) Option Term
  (f) Transferability
  (g) No Rights as a Shareholder
  7




---



##### 



(h) Amendment, Modification, and Termination of Options
  (i) Substitute Options
  6. RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS
 (a) Grant of Restricted Stock Awards
  (b) Restricted Stock Award Agreement
  (c) Transferability
  8




---



##### 



(d) Other Restrictions
     (e) Voting Rights
  9




---



##### 



(f) Dividends and Other Distributions
  (g) Vesting Event
  (h) Payment of Taxes
   10




---



##### 



7. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT/DIRECTORSHIP
        11




---



##### 



8. PERFORMANCE MEASURES
  (a)
    
    Net income (before or after taxes);(b)
    
    Earnings per share;(c)
    
    Cash Flow;(d)
    
    Share price (including, but not limited to, growth measures and total
shareholder return);(e)
    
    Net interest income;(f)
    
    Net interest margin;(g)
    
    Non-interest income;(h)
    
    Efficiency ratio; and(i)
    
    Any of the above measures compared to peer or other companies.
   12




---



##### 



9. PAYMENT FOR SHARES OF STOCK.
 (a) General Rule
   10. TAX WITHHOLDING.
   13




---



##### 



11. ADJUSTMENTS TO EQUITY AWARDS.
 (a) Adjustments Upon Changes in Capitalization
  (b) Reservation of Rights
  12. TERMINATING EVENTS.
  14




---



##### 



13. SECURITIES LAWS.
    14. NO RIGHT TO CONTINUED EMPLOYMENT OR DIRECTORSHIP.
  15. DURATION AND AMENDMENTS.
 (a) Term of the Plan
  15




---



##### 



(b) Right to Amend or Terminate the Plan
  (c) Effect of Amendment or Termination
  16. GOVERNING LAW; INTEGRATION
  17. APPLICATION OF CODE SECTION 409A
     16
No. 09-658.

#### Brian Belleque, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Petitioner v. Randy Joseph Moore.

559 U.S. 1004, 130 S. Ct. 1882,

176 L. Ed. 2d 361,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2679.

March 22, 2010.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.

Same case below, 574 F.3d 1092.
20 October 2009 *************************** 

NSN: 8920 01 573 1772 (RVW) *MONOGRAPH NO: 3A21

 ************************** 

Item: Red Velvet Cake with White Icing 

Document: PCR-C-024, Cakes and Brownies, Packaged in a Polymeric Tray, Shelf Stable 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 175 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Cake: fully baked, uniform cell (crumb) structure, and no evidence of compression 

streaks; red brown surface and crumb. 

Icing: shiny, white.

Odor: Cake: sweet chocolate. 

Icing: sweet.

Flavor: Cake: sweet chocolate. 

Icing: sweet.

Texture: Cake: dense, tender, moist, fine grain.

Icing: smooth and easily spreadable.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Cake: darkened, tinged crumb; dry and crumbly or excessively dense and moist.

Icing: darkened; separated; oily.

Odor: Cake: sour, off, heat stressed, musty. 

Icing: rancid, off.

Flavor: Cake: sour, off, heat stressed, old chocolate. 

Icing: rancid; plastic.

Texture: Cake: dry; stale; crumbly; dense; excessively moist.

Icing: crystallized; weepy.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

NA
No. 09-9670.

#### Romaldo Acuna Gomez, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1083, 130 S. Ct. 2129,

176 L. Ed. 2d 750,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3171.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 583.
No. 09-9195.

#### Alex Rodriguez, Petitioner v. James Walker, Warden.

559 U.S. 1095, 130 S. Ct. 2375,

176 L. Ed. 2d 773,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3556.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jonathan Adrian FULLER

No. 418P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2019

Guy J. Loranger, Attorney at Law, for Fuller, Jonathan Adrian.

Kimberly Sharice Murrell, Attorney at Law, Garry W. Frank, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Jonathan Adrian Fuller, for Fuller, Jonathan Adrian.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of November 2018 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 26th of November 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."