alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                           Code of Ethics and Conduct

                       Magnitude Information Systems, Inc.



Directors:

We will strive for timely decision making, fair pricing, and good faith
negotiations, and maintain the highest levels of competence and professionalism
in the conduct of our activities,

We will disclose all actual and potential conflicts of interest, or even the
appearance of such conflicts, prior to entering into any business discussions,
negotiations, or dealings,

We will use our best efforts to preserve the confidentiality of any proprietary
or confidential information disclosed to us and use such information strictly
for the purposes for which it was disclosed, and

Employees and Directors:

We will be truthful in all endeavors with our clients, our shareholders, and one
another,

We will deliver what we promise and stand up for what is right,

We will treat one another with dignity and respect and acknowledge the
uniqueness of each individual, and

We will voice concerns in the workplace without fear of retribution, including
violations of law, regulations and company policies, and seek clarification and
guidance whenever needed.

Approved by the Magnitude Board of Directors
December 2002

<PAGE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
FOR THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [Reserved]c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ John M. Hughes
Name: John M. HughesTitle: Chief Financial Officer
### RE: Meeting tomorrow on NO2 monitoring Lydia Wegman to: King, Heidi R. 01/19/2010 10:13 AM Cc: Karen Martin, Nealson Watkins, Richard Wayland, Scott Jenkins, Tricia Crabtree Is there any chance that we could meet at 11? "King, Heidi R." 01/19/2010 10:09:47 AM I'm on another call, but available at 10:30. Woul...
From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi

_ R.

_ King@omb.eop.gov> To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Richard Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Nealson Watkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Scott Jenkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 01/19/2010 10:09 AM Subject: RE: Meeting tomorrow on NO2 monitoring

I'm on another call, but available at 10:30. Would that work? -----Original Message----- From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Monday, January 18, 2010 12:17 PM To: King, Heidi R. Cc: Wayland.Richard@epamail.epa.gov; Nealson Watkins; Scott Jenkins; Karen Martin; Tricia Crabtree Subject: Meeting tomorrow on NO2 monitoring
Heidi, I hope you're feeling better and are having a good weekend. Following the management discussion today, we'd like to meet with you tomorrow, rather than wait until Wednesday, to discuss the issue of how many near-road monitors we will require in the NO2 rule. Do you have time to talk tomorrow after 10 AM? Please let me know. Lydia
No. 09-9048.

#### Raul Medrano Betancourt, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1021, 130 S. Ct. 1920,

176 L. Ed. 2d 390,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2445.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 586 F.3d 303.
No. 09-9466.

#### Thomas Joseph Cutaia, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

560 U.S. 907, 130 S. Ct. 3279,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1189,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3887,

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. QF08-564-000] 

Take notice that on May 15, 2008, Georgia Pacific Toledo LLC (“GP”), 1400 SE. Butler Bridge Road, Toledo, Oregon 97391, filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission a notice of self-certification of a facility as a qualifying cogeneration facility pursuant to 18 CFR 292.207(a) of the Commission's regulations. 

GP states that the facility in question is a topping-cycle cogeneration facility with a primary energy source of natural gas. The cogeneration facility consists of two black liquor recovery boilers, three power boilers, and one hog fuel (bark) boiler to generate electricity and process heat to serve the resident paper mill. The facility is located in Toledo, Oregon. 

GP further states that the facility is interconnected to Central Lincoln PUD (“Lincoln”), and expects from time-to-time to sell energy to or purchase supplementary, standby, back-up, and maintenance power from Lincoln. 

A notice of self-certification does not institute a proceeding regarding qualifying facility status; a notice of self-certification provides notice that the entity making filing has determined the Facility meets the applicable criteria to be a qualifying facility. Any person seeking to challenge such qualifying facility status may do so by filing a motion pursuant to 18 CFR 292.207(d)(iii). 

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov,*                     using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*                     or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E9-5262 Filed 3-11-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
1DWXUDO *DV 0DUNHWHG 3URGXFWLRQ

KWWSZZZHLDJRYGQDYQJQJBSURGBVXPBDBHSJBYJPBPPFIBDKWP 

1$785$/ *$6

29(59,(: $1$/<6,6 	 352-(&7,216 */266$5< 3⁄4 )$46 3⁄4

1DWXUDO *DV *URVV :LWKGUDZDOV DQG 3URGXFWLRQ

9ROXPHV LQ 0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

'DWD 6HULHV 0DUNHWHG 3URGXFWLRQ 3HULRG8QLW $QQXDO0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

6KRZ 'DWD %\

'DWD

6HULHV $UHD

'$7$

*UDSK

&OHDU      

9LHZ

+LVWRU\

86       

$ODVND       

$ODVND 2QVKRUH       

$ODVND 6WDWH 2IIVKRUH       

$UNDQVDV       

&DOLIRUQLD       

&DOLIRUQLD 2QVKRUH       

&DOLIRUQLD 6WDWH

2IIVKRUH       

)HGHUDO 2IIVKRUH

&DOLIRUQLD       

&RORUDGR       

)HGHUDO 2IIVKRUH *XOI RI

0H[LFR       

)HGHUDO 2IIVKRUH $ODEDPD 

)HGHUDO 2IIVKRUH /RXLVLDQD 

)HGHUDO 2IIVKRUH 7H[DV 

.DQVDV       

/RXLVLDQD       

/RXLVLDQD 2QVKRUH       

/RXLVLDQD 6WDWH 2IIVKRUH       

0RQWDQD       

1HZ 0H[LFR       

1RUWK 'DNRWD       

2KLR       

2NODKRPD       

3HQQV\OYDQLD       

7H[DV       

7H[DV 2QVKRUH       

7H[DV 6WDWH 2IIVKRUH       

8WDK       

:HVW 9LUJLQLD       

:\RPLQJ       

2WKHU 6WDWHV

2WKHU 6WDWHV 7RWDO       

$ODEDPD       

$ODEDPD 2QVKRUH       

$ODEDPD 6WDWH 2IIVKRUH       

$UL]RQD       

)ORULGD       
 1DWXUDO *DV 0DUNHWHG 3URGXFWLRQ

KWWSZZZHLDJRYGQDYQJQJBSURGBVXPBDBHSJBYJPBPPFIBDKWP 

,OOLQRLV       

,QGLDQD       

.HQWXFN\       

0DU\ODQG       

0LFKLJDQ       

0LVVLVVLSSL       

0LVVRXUL 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$   

1HEUDVND       

1HYDGD       

1HZ <RUN       

2UHJRQ       

6RXWK 'DNRWD       

7HQQHVVHH       

9LUJLQLD       

&OLFN RQ WKH VRXUFH NH\ LFRQ WR OHDUQ KRZ WR GRZQORDG VHULHV LQWR ([FHO RU WR HPEHG D FKDUW RU PDS RQ \RXU ZHEVLWH

 1R 'DWD 5HSRUWHG  1RW $SSOLFDEOH 1$ 1RW $YDLODEOH : :LWKKHOG WR DYRLG GLVFORVXUH RI LQGLYLGXDO FRPSDQ\ GDWD

1RWHV %HJLQQLQJ ZLWK PRQWKO\ GDWD IRU -DQXDU\  2WKHU 6WDWHV YROXPHV LQFOXGH DOO RI WKH QDWXUDO JDV SURGXFLQJ VWDWHV H[FHSW $ODVND $UNDQVDV

&DOLIRUQLD &RORUDGR .DQVDV /RXLVLDQD 0RQWDQD 1HZ 0H[LFR 1RUWK 'DNRWD 2KLR 2NODKRPD 3HQQV\OYDQLD 7H[DV 8WDK :HVW 9LUJLQLD :\RPLQJ DQG WKH

*XOI RI 0H[LFR 'DWD IRU  DUH HVWLPDWHG 0RQWKO\ SUHOLPLQDU\ IURP -DQXDU\  WR SUHVHQW VWDWHOHYHO GDWD IRU WKH SURGXFWLRQ VHULHV H[FHSW PDUNHWHG

SURGXFWLRQ DUH QRW DYDLODEOH XQWLO DIWHU WKH ILQDO DQQXDO UHSRUWV IRU WKHVH VHULHV DUH FROOHFWHG DQG SURFHVVHG )LQDO DQQXDO GDWD DUH JHQHUDOO\ DYDLODEOH LQ WKH WKLUG

TXDUWHU RI WKH IROORZLQJ \HDU )RU \HDUV SULRU WR  FRDOEHG SURGXFWLRQ GDWD DUH LQFOXGHG LQ *DV :HOO WRWDOV )RU IRUZDUG JURVV SURGXFWLRQ IURP FRDOEHG

PHWKDQH DQG VKDOH GDWD DUH IURP 3RLQW/RJLF (QHUJ\ 6HH 'HILQLWLRQV 6RXUFHV DQG 1RWHV OLQN DERYH IRU PRUH LQIRUPDWLRQ RQ WKLV WDEOH

5HOHDVH 'DWH 

1H[W 5HOHDVH 'DWH
2008 VOC & NOx Target Levels

VOC Target Level for 2008 Milestone

Cecil County Nonattainment Area

Emissions in Tons per Day

Formula

A2002 Base Year Inventory 60.52

BBiogenic Emissions 42.94

C2002 Rate-of Progress Base Year Inventory A - B 17.58

DFMVCP/RVP Reductions Between 2002 and 2008 0.69

E2002 Adjusted Base Year Inventory Calculated Relative to 2008 C - D 16.89

F Ratio 0.0700

GEmissions Reductions Required Between 2002 and 2008 E * F 1.18

HTarget Level for 2008 [TL(2008)] H - G 15.71

I Contingency Percentage 3.00%

J Contingency Requirements E * J 0.51

KTarget Level for 2008 [TL(2008)] + Contingency H - K 15.20

Emission Level Obtained 14.65

NOx Target Level for 2008 Milestone

Cecil County Nonattainment Area

Emissions in Tons per Day

Formula

A2002 Base Year Inventory 17.40

BBiogenic Emissions 0.00

C2002 Rate-of Progress Base Year Inventory A - B 17.40

DFMVCP/RVP Reductions Between 2002 and 2008 2.19

E2002 Adjusted Base Year Inventory Calculated Relative to 2008 C - D 15.21

F Ratio 0.0800

GEmissions Reductions Required Between 2002 and 2008 E * F 1.22

HTarget Level for 2008 [TL(2008)] H - G 13.99

I Contingency Percentage 0.00

J Contingency Requirements E * J 0.00

KTarget Level for 2008 [TL(2008)] + Contingency H - K 13.99

Emission Level Obtained 11.05
#### In the Matter of Daniel Karlin, Respondent, v James McMahon, as Superintendent of the New York State Police, et al., Appellants.

[719 NYS2d 613]

Carpinello, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lamont, J.), entered July 1, 1999 in Albany County, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondents denying petitioner’s Freedom of Information Law request for State Police records and documents pertaining to his arrest and conviction of certain sex crimes.

On August 18, 1998, petitioner made a request under the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law art 6) for records pertaining to his arrest and conviction for certain sex offenses. The request was denied on the ground that the documents sought were exempt from disclosure pursuant to Civil Rights Law § 50-b. After this denial was administratively affirmed, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding. Supreme Court annulled respondents’ determination, granted the petition and directed respondents to provide petitioner with the requested records. Respondents appeal.

Respondents argue that petitioner is not entitled to any requested record which identifies the victim of a sex offense, said record being exempt from disclosure under Civil Rights Law § 50-b (1). They further assert that petitioner does not fall within the exception under Civil Rights Law § 50-b (2) (a)— permitting disclosure to a person “charged” with the commission of a sex offense — because he now stands *convicted*of certain sex offenses. In *Matter of Doyen v McMahon*(271 AD2d 852, *lv granted*App. Div., 3d Dept., July 5, 2000), this identical issue was decided by this Court in favor of an individual similarly situated to petitioner *(see also, Matter of Stapleton v Pakstis,*268 AD2d 294, *lv granted*95 NY2d 759; *Matter of Fappiano v New York City Police Dept.,*267 AD2d 156, *lv granted*271 AD2d 938). Finding no reason to disturb our prior decision, we affirm the judgment of Supreme Court.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5033 

To permit access to certain information in the Firearms Trace System 

database. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 28, 2006 

Mr. ROTHMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To permit access to certain information in the Firearms 

Trace System database. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FIREARMS TRACE SYSTEM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Science, State, Justice, Com5 merce, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2006 

6 (Public Law 109–108; 119 Stat. 2295) is amended in title 

7 I, under the heading ‘‘BUREAU OFALCOHOL, TOBACCO, 

8 FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES’’, by striking ‘‘: Provided fur9 ther, That no funds appropriated under this or any other 

10 Act with respect to any fiscal year may be used to disclose 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5033 IH 

1 part or all of the contents of the Firearms Trace System 

2 database’’ and all that follows through ‘‘section 

3 921(a)(10) of such title):’’. 

4 (b) ACCESS TO INFORMATION.—The Attorney Gen5 eral shall provide public access to the Crime Gun Trace 

6 Report (both nationally and for individual cities) from the 

7 Youth Crime Gun Interdiction Initiative, which is gen8 erated using information in the Firearms Trace System 

9 database maintained by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, 

10 Firearms and Explosives. 

Æ 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
No. 09-8059.

#### Timothy Rosencrantz, Petitioner v. Blaine Lafler, Warden.

559 U.S. 1107, 130 S. Ct. 2401,

176 L. Ed. 2d 925,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3700.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 568 F.3d 577.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5114 

To limit the development or implementation of a return-free tax system. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2006 

Ms. HART (for herself, Ms. ESHOO, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, Mr. 

TIAHRT, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mrs. NORTHUP, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. POMBO, 

Mr. CLEAVER, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. SIMMONS, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. GRAVES, 

Mr. PENCE, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. CAMPBELL of California, Mr. 

CONAWAY, Mr. MCCAUL of Texas, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. OTTER, Mr. 

PEARCE, Mr. GOODE, Miss MCMORRIS, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. ISSA, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mrs. MILLER

of Michigan, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. CANNON, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. HERGER, 

Ms. HARRIS, Mr. GERLACH, Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina, Mr. ENGLISH

of Pennsylvania, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. 

SIMPSON, Mr. KLINE, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. ROSS, Mr. 

LEWIS of Kentucky, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. MANZULLO, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. PORTER, Mr. CARTER, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, Ms. 

BEAN, Mr. REYNOLDS, Mr. CANTOR, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. MCHENRY, Mr. 

CARDOZA, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, 

Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. HONDA, Mr. 

HASTINGS of Washington, Mr. BEAUPREZ, Mr. JINDAL, Mr. SWEENEY, 

Mr. BOUSTANY, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. WAMP, Mr. FORBES, Mrs. CAPITO, 

Mr. POE, Mrs. KELLY, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. WALSH, 

Mr. MURPHY, Mr. AKIN, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, 

Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. BERRY, Mr. BOYD, Mr. MELANCON, Mr. CAPUANO, 

Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. RENZI, Mr. ROGERS of Michigan, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. HALL, Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. 

LOBIONDO, Mr. CHOCOLA, Mr. WELLER, and Mr. FOLEY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5114 IH 

A BILL 

To limit the development or implementation of a returnfree tax system. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tax Return Choice 

5 Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RETURN-FREE TAX SYSTEM. 

7 (a) LIMITATION.—The Internal Revenue Service shall 

8 not develop or provide taxpayers with free individual tax 

9 electronic preparation and filing services except through 

10 the Free File program and the Internal Revenue Service’s 

11 Taxpayer Assistance Centers, Tax Counseling for the El12 derly, and volunteer income tax assistance programs. 

13 (b) REPEAL OF GENERAL AUTHORITY.—Section 

14 2004 of the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and 

15 Reform Act of 1998 is hereby repealed. 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

17 this section shall take effect on the date of enactment of 

18 this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5152]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Board of Scientific Counselors, National Center for Health 
Statistics: Notice of Charter Renewal

    This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Board of Scientific Counselors, 
National Center for Health Statistics, Department of Health and Human 
Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period through January 19, 
2011.
    For information, contact Virginia Cain, Ph.D., Executive Secretary, 
Board of Scientific Counselors, National Center for Health Statistics, 
Department of Health and Human Services, 3311 Toledo Road, Room 7204, 
Mailstop P08, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, telephone 301/458-4395 or 
fax 301/458-4020.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: February 3, 2009.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9-5152 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
#### Thomas R. Reis et al., Respondents, v Mystic Transportation, Inc., Appellant, Coastal Oil New York, Inc., Defendant, and Bayside Fuel Oil Corporation, Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[719 NYS2d 601]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Mystic Transportation, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, *564J.), dated July 28, 1999, as denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the cross motion is granted, the complaint and all cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

The plaintiff Thomas R. Reis was injured while descending a metal rung ladder on an oil delivery truck owned by the defendant Mystic Transportation, Inc. (hereinafter Mystic). Shortly before the accident, Reis obtained an oil sample from the top of the truck during the course of his employment as an inspector for the New York City Housing Authority. At an examination before trial, Reis testified that he stepped in oil when he retrieved the sample and that the oil on his shoes caused him to slip on the ladder.

Mystic is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law, as it made a prima facie showing that the accident was not caused by any negligence on its part *(see, Segretti v Shorenstein Co., E.,*256 AD2d 234; *Agbi v York Intl. Corp.,*249 AD2d 430; *Mercer v City of New York,*223 AD2d 688, *affd,*88 NY2d 955). The plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact to defeat Mystic’s prima facie showing of its entitlement to summary judgment *(see,*CPLR 3212 [b]; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557). Krausman, J. P., Luciano, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dogs International (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Shaun Herness, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

-  The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 

                                                                                               /S/Shaun Herness           

                                                                                               Shaun Herness

                                                                                               Secretary and Treasurer

                                                                                               November 20, 2003