alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105·3901

OFfiCE OF THE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR September 21, 2010

The Honorable Wendsler Nosie San Carlos ApacheTribe P.O. Box 0 San Carlos, Arizona 85550 Dear Chairperson Nosie: Thepurpose ofthis letter is to notify you that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) intends to retain the designations for the 1987 24-hour coarse particle (PM\o) national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) that cunentlyapply to the San Carlos Apache lands. On December 30,2009, mypredecessor, LauraYoshii, sent you a letter informingyou that, based on continuing violations ofthe PMIQ NAAQS in Pinal County, EPA had determined that a revised designation for the 1987 24-hour PM10 NAAQS would benecessary. Wehave completed our evaluation and intend to redesignate a portion ofPinal County as "nonattainment," as described in the enclosed detailed analysis. Wehave, however, determined that emissions from activities occurring on yourreservation are not causing or contributing to the violations measured in western Pinal County. As a result, we are not proposing to include your tribal lands in the new PM10 nonattainment area. The "unclassifiable" designation that applies to most ofyour lands, and the "nonattainment" designation that applies to the small portion ofthe San Carlos Apache Reservation that is included in the Hayden PM\o nonattainment area, will stay the same. A notice invitingpublic comment on ourproposal will be published in the Federal Register in the near future. Ihave enclosed a pre-publication copy with this letter. Should you have additional information that you wish to be considered by EPA in this process, please provide it to us bythe end ofthe public commentperiod. We intend to make final designation decisions for the 1987 24-hour PM10NAAQS for areas addressed in the currentproposal before the end of201O.

Prin/td on**Rl!cycl~d** PaperWelook forward to continuing to work with you and your staffto ensure a healthy environment. Should you or your air quality staffhave any questions, please contact Colleen McKaughan, Associate AirDivision Director at 520-498-0118. Sincerely,

Jar 

## a lumenfeld Ronal Administrator
Enclosures
cc: Loretta Stone, Environmental Director (via email)

2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23-2


                       [RYDER SCOTT COMPANY LETTERHEAD]


                              February 27, 1998




MCN Energy Group Inc.
500 Griswold
Detroit, Michigan 48226


                              Re:   MCN Energy Group Inc.
                                    1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K


Ladies and Gentlemen:

        The firm of Ryder Scott Company Petroleum Engineers consents to the use
of its name and the information contained in its report dated January 22, 1998,
regarding MCN Energy Group Inc.'s oil and gas reserve information as of
December 31, 1997 in its 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

        In addition, Ryder Scott Company Petroleum Engineers consents to the
incorporation by reference of said material in Registration Statement Nos.
333-02105 and 333-02107 on Form S-8, 333-01523, 333-21175 and 333-45281 on Form
S-3 and Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No.
33-21930-99 on Form S-8 of MCN Energy Group Inc.

        Ryder Scott Company Petroleum Engineers has no interest in MCN Energy
Group Inc. or in any affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive
such interest as payment for such reports and has no director, officer, or
employee otherwise connected with MCN Energy Group Inc.  We are not employed by
MCN Energy Group Inc. on a contingent basis.


                                                Very truly yours,

                                                /s/ Ryder Scott Company
                                                    Petroleum Engineers

                                                RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                                PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


CPM/sw
BAKER v. The NC PSYCHOLOGY BOARD

412P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

C. Amanda Martin, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Michael J. Tadych, Attorney at Law, for Baker, Annette (Ph.D.)

Sondra C. Panico, Assistant Attorney General, for The North Carolina Psychology Board.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of January 2019 by Plaintiff for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Davis, J. recused
OFFICE STAN

COUNTY CLERK, COUNTY, TEXAS

COUNTYCIVILCOURTSDEPARTMENT

5, 2015

Court of Appeals

301 Fannin ·

Texas77002

SUBJ: Non—Paymentof Clerk’s Record

REF: #14-14-00941-CV /Trial Court#1053195

Court # Three (3)

SHELLI R WHEELER

VS.

EK & AC ENTERPRISES, INC.

This letter is to inform you appellant, EK & AC Inc., has not paid for the Original C1erk’s

Record in the above referenced case. The appellant’s attorney was by mailed of the cost for the Record

on December 2014. As of January 5, 2015, no fees have been posted for this Record. If I can be of any

further assistance contact me at 755-9425. The original letter will be electronically with the

Court of Appeals on January 2015.

Sincerely,Stan

Stanart

County Clerk:2:

/S/Joshua Alegria

JoshuaAlegria ·

Deputy Clerk

_

P.O. Box 1525 Houston, TX 77251-1525 (713) 755-6421

FormNo. 1-1-01-306(Rev.08/15/2011) Page 1ofl

1

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/5/2015 4:19:46 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
on 12/1/2014 3:04:48 PM

OFFICE OF STAN STANART

COUNTY CLERK, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

CIVIL COURTS DEPARTMENT

COST LETTER

December 1, 2014

Theadore R. Andrews

5177 Richmond Avenue, Suite 1275

Houston, Texas 77056

RE: DOCKET NO. 1053195, COUNTY COURT AT LAW Three (3)

SHELLIE WHEELER

vs.

EK & AC ENTERPRISES, INC.

Dear Theadore R. Andrews,

In accordance to TRAP 35.3(a), I

am notifying you that is for the ofthe

Clerk’s Record from the Notice of Appeal that was filed on November 21, 2014. Please remit payment in the form of

cash, cashier check, credit card, or money order checks will not be payable to STAN STANART,

County Clerk. If you have any questions about the Record contact me at (713) 755-9425.

Sincerely,

STAN STANART, County Clerk

Alegria

Deputy Clerk1>.o.

1525 I TX I (713)

(Rev. 04/29/2011) 1 of 1

2
yearID sourceTypeID sourceTypePopulation

2009 11 96

2009 21 2184

2009 31 1587

2009 32 529

2009 41 4

2009 42 2

2009 43 24

2009 51 3

2009 52 117

2009 53 14

2009 54 28

2009 61 53

2009 62 62
No. 09-9316.

#### James DiMaria, Petitioner v. Dale Artus, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility.

559 U.S. 1097, 130 S. Ct. 2382,

176 L. Ed. 2d 776,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3496.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



In connection with this Quarterly Report of Hewitt Associates, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                                         |  | 
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------- |  | 
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: January 30, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Dale L. Gifford                    
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                                         | 
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Dale L. Gifford Chief Executive Officer
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

No. 20-50932 Summary Calendar

United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee ,

versus Adrian Nicolas Mendoza-Valles, Defendant—Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:20-CR-139-1

Before Clement, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: * Adrian Nicolas Mendoza-Valles appeal s his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States after a prior removal, which followed the denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Mendoza-Valles contends, citing Pereira v. Sessions , 138 S. Ct. 2105 (2018),

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 6, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-50932 Document: 00515851801 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/06/2021No. 20-50932

2 that his prior removal does not satisfy the removal element of § 1326 because the notice to appear underlying that removal did not provide the date and time of the removal hearing.
In United States v. Pedroza-Rocha , 933 F.3d 490, 497–98 (5th Cir. 2019), cert. denied , 140 S. Ct. 2769 (2020), we relied on Pierre-Paul v. Barr , 930 F.3d 684, 688–89 (5th Cir. 2019), cert. denied , 140 S. Ct. 2718 (2020), to conclude that (1) a notice to appear that lacked the date and time of the removal hearing was not defective, (2) any defect was cured by the subsequent service of a notice of hear ing, and (3) the purported defect was not jurisdictional. Additionally, we held that the defendant could not collaterally attack the notice to appear without first exhausting administrative remedies. Pedroza-Rocha , 933 F.3d at 498. Conceding that Pedroza-Rocha and Pierre-Paul foreclose his claim, Mendoza-Valles raises it to preserve it for further review.
The Government has filed an un opposed motion for summary affirmance, which is proper if “the position of one of the parties is clearly right as a matter of law so that there can be no substantial qu estion as to the outcome of the case.” Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). Because Mendoza-Valle s correctly concedes that his claim is foreclosed by Pierre-Paul and Pedroza-Rocha , the motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED and the Government’s alte rnative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED AS MOOT. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED

. Case: 20-50932 Document: 00515851801 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/06/2021
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 137008 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137008 

 COA: 284883 

Wayne CC: 02-013452

KAREM G. MESI,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 11, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1117 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 25, 2008 

 Clerk
STATE v. Rama Dion Benjamin CRUMP

151PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 5, 2019

Ann B. Petersen, Attorney at Law, for Crump, Ramar Dion Benjamin

James R. Glover, Attorney at Law, Peter A. Regulski, Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney Generals, Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 5th of June 2019 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of June 2019."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 10th day of July 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
STATE of North Carolina v. Deontae Savon GREEN

No. COA18-691

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 16, 2019

DISMISSED IN PART. VACATED. REMANDED IN PART.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

SUSAN WINKLE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D13-2124 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ )

Opinion filed May 20, 2015.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Martha J. Cook, Judge.

Ita M. Neymotin, Regional Counsel, and Walter A. Otto, Jr., Assistant Regional
Counsel of Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Tampa, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to any right the appellant might h ave to file a

facially sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Proce dure 3.850.

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, an d SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Shane McMahon, the Chief Executive Officer of YOU ON DEMAND HOLDINGS, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.      The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 15th day of April, 2011.





/s/ Shane McMahonShane McMahonChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to YOU On Demand Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by YOU On Demand Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
LAND AND MARITIME
P.O. BOX 3990
COLUMBUS, OHIO 43218-3990

December 19, 2012

FITNESS PROGRAM AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
DLA LAND AND MARITIME
AND
IFPTE LOCAL 7

Provisions of Agreement. DLA Land and Maritime and IFPTE Local 7 agree to the
application of the DLA Directive-type Memorandum (DTM) 13-002-DLA Fitness Program
of December 13, 2012 to the union’s bargaining unit employees. Employees may participate
on days when they have been authorized to telework subject to supervisory approval.

Effective Date. This agreement is effective December 19, 2012.

J CALHOUN HARVEY HODAK
President Human Resources Specialist (LR/ER)
IFPTE Local 7 DHRS-C

re fis | eore (2/21/20) 2
"Date

"Date
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-21-00315-CR

Kip BRENCHLEY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 5, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 598744

Honorable John Longoria, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 6, 2021

DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed by Appellant and his 

attorney. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Appellant’s motion is granted; this appeal is dismissed. See 

id.; Hypolite v. State, 647 S.W.2d 294, 295 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983); Conners v. State, 966 S.W.2d 

108, 110 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. ref’d).

PER CURIAM

Do not publish
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-11007 Conference Calendar

__________________
STANLEY J. STEVENS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus R. TUCKER, LT., Employees, TDCJ Dalhart Unit; R.J. ALFORD, CAPT., Employees, TDCJ Dalhart Unit; A. BEAMER, Employees, TDCJ Dalhart Unit, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:95-CV-165

- - - - - - - - - - March 1, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Stevens appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Stevens argues that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs by disciplining him for refusing to work. We have reviewed the record, the district court's opinion, and appellant's brief and discern no reversible error. Further, we hold that Stevens' appeal is frivolous, and accordingly, weNo. 95-11007 -2- DISMISS it pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Stevens is hereby BARRED from filing any pro se , in forma pauperis , civil appeal in this court, or any pro se , in forma pauperis , initial civil pleading in any court which is subject to this court's jurisdiction, without the advance written permission of a judge of the forum court; the clerk of this court and the clerks of all federal district courts in this Circuit are directed to return to Stevens, unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this bar.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED.
# U.S. Department of the Interior - Stewarding Conservation and Powering Our Future

Stewarding Conservation and Powering Our Future
MARTIN v. STATE of NC, et al.

210P16-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Michael T. Wood, Special Deputy Attorney General, Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

Dale P. Martin, For Martin, Dale Patrick

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of January 2019 by Petitioner for Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
ODNIHeader2




Print
  Foreign influence and interference in U.S. elections pose significant threats to our democracy. The Intelligence Community (IC) is committed to protecting our democratic processes and institutions from foreign influence and interference. Election security is an enduring challenge and a top priority for the IC.The Election Threats Executive (ETE)coordinates and integrates all election security activities, initiatives, and programs across the IC and synchronizes intelligence efforts in support of the broader U.S. government. The ETE also chairs the IC’s Election Executive and Leadership Board. Members of this board are senior-executive leads from across the IC and all relevant U.S. government organizations. The board serves as the principal vehicle for IC-wide coordination and focus on election threats.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-02095) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan
and Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan of Walter Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries of our reports dated February 26, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Walter Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Walter Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/
Ernst & Young LLP
Tampa, Florida
February 26, 2009

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                       10.(x)(B)

February 18, 1997
 
Tom Grimes
c/o Tremmingham's 37 Front Street
Hamilton, Bermuda

Dear Tom:

Reference is made to your Compensation Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of 
February 3, 1997, with Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated (the "Company").

In order to induce you to accept the offer of employment contained in the 
Agreement, General Electric Capital Corporation ("GE Capital"), as a principal 
shareholder in the Company, hereby agrees with you that if, for any reason other
than termination of your employment, either voluntarily by you or for "cause" by
the Company, the Company shall fail to pay to you the base salary for the first 
three years of such Agreement and the first year guaranteed bonus of such 
Agreement, then GE Capital shall pay such amounts to you as provided in and 
subject to the conditions of the Agreement. This obligation on the part of GE 
Capital shall be triggered by your written notice to GE Capital that the Company
has ceased to make such payments as required by such Agreement.

Very truly yours,

General Electric Capital Corporation

By: /s/ Edward D. Stewart
    --------------------------------
    Executive Vice President
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JANICE DUNCAN

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee.

No. 4D2022

- 3087

[ January 11, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County; Barbara R. Duffy, Judge; L.T. Case No. 19013410CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Christine C. Geraghty,

Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER

, G ERBER and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
STATE of North Carolina v. Vincent Lamont HARRIS, Defendant.

No. COA18-952

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 2, 2019

REVERSED.