alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Optigenex Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Joseph
W. McSherry, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the
Chief Financial Officer of Optigenex Inc. with the requirements of Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used for any other purposes. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Optigenex Inc. and will be retained by Optigenex Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                             /s/ Joseph W. McSherry
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Joseph W. McSherry
                                             Chief Financial Officer

Dated: January 21, 2005
No. 09-7643.

#### Oscar Garcia-Quiroz, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1093, 130 S. Ct. 2370,

176 L. Ed. 2d 770,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3590.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 339 Fed. Appx. 501.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v. ANTWAIN OLIVER, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 509 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 16th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5103 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5103

 To provide for the conveyance of the former Konnarock Lutheran Girls 
   School in Smyth County, Virginia, which is currently owned by the 
United States and administered by the Forest Service, to facilitate the 
     restoration and reuse of the property, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2006

 Mr. Boucher introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the conveyance of the former Konnarock Lutheran Girls 
   School in Smyth County, Virginia, which is currently owned by the 
United States and administered by the Forest Service, to facilitate the 
     restoration and reuse of the property, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, FORMER KONNAROCK LUTHERAN GIRLS SCHOOL, 
              JEFFERSON NATIONAL FOREST, SMYTH COUNTY, VIRGINIA.

    (a) Conveyance Required.--The Secretary of Agriculture shall 
convey, without consideration, to the Evangelical Lutheran Coalition 
for Mission in Appalachia (in this section referred to as the 
``recipient'') all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
and to a parcel of real property in the Jefferson National Forest, 
Smyth County, Virginia, located at the junction of Virginia Routes 600 
and 603, consisting of approximately 10 acres, and containing the 
former Konnarock Lutheran Girls School and its outbuildings.
    (b) Condition of Conveyance.--The conveyance under subsection (a) 
shall be subject to the condition that the recipient accept the real 
property described in such subsection in its condition at the time of 
the conveyance, commonly known as conveyance ``as is''.
    (c) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal 
description of the real property to be conveyed under subsection (a) 
shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary. The cost 
of the survey shall be borne by the recipient.
    (d) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require 
such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance 
under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect 
the interests of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-40330

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

John Fontenot, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:17-CR-728-11

Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Defendant-Appellant John 

Fontenot moves for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 15, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-40330 Document: 00516240178 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/15/2022
No. 21-40330

2

portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

review.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, 

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

Case: 21-40330 Document: 00516240178 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/15/2022
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



In connection with this Quarterly Report of Hewitt Associates, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                    |  |     |  |                        
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: July 30, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Dale L. Gifford    
|                    |  |     |  | Dale L. Gifford        
|                    |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Hewitt Associates, Inc. and will be retained by Hewitt Associates, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as and exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part
of the Form 10-Q.
Beverly Eaves Perdue 

Governor 

Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming 

Regional Administrator 

USEP A, Region 4 

Sam Nunn Federal Center 

61 Forsyth Street, SW 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 

Dear Ms. Fleming: 

Director 

August 30, 2012 

Dee Freeman 

Secretary 

This letter is to request the conditional approval of the Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill area 

Reasonably Available Control Technology State Implementation Plan (Metrolina RACT SIP) 

submitted under Section 182(b )(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). North Carolina submitted the 

original RACT SIP to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in April2007, followed by a 

revision in January 2008. 

Based on monitoring data, North Carolina is attaining the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient 

Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) and received a clean data determination for the area on November 

15, 2011. However, EPA has identified the need for an adjustment of applicability of North 

Carolina's Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) RACT rules for all sources addressed by Control 

Technology Guidelines (CTGs) in areas classified as moderate and above for the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS. Specifically, the EPA is requiring North Carolina to address RACT for sources 

with VOC emissions less than 100 tons per year. North Carolina is in the process of revising its 

state rules to reflect applicability requirements for these sources. 

The schedule for the rule revision is as follows: 

Draft Rule to Air Quality Committee 

Request to Proceed to Hearing to EMC 

Start of Public Comment 

Close of Public Comment 

EMC Adoption 

Rules Review Commission Approval 

Effective Date (if 10 or more letters of 

Objection are not received) 

1641 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1641 

217 West Jones Street, Raleigh, NC 27603 

Phone: 919-707-8401 I FAX 919-715-0718 I Internet: www.ncair.org 

An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 

September 12, 2012 

November 8, 2012 

December 3, 2012 

February 1, 20 13 

March 14, 2013 

April 18, 2013 

May 1, 2013 

N~rth Carolina 

JVaturallu 
Ms. Fleming 

August 30, 2012 

Page 2 

North Carolina commits to submit revisions to VOC RACT rules within one year of EPA's 

conditional approval of the Metrolina RACT SIP regarding CAA Section 182(b)(2). Once these 

revisions are submitted, the requirements of Section 182(b )(2) will be satisfied. If you should have 

any questions regarding this activity, please contact Joelle Burleson of my staff at (919) 707-8720. 

SCH/ssm 

cc: Michael Abraczinskas 

Sushma Masemore 

Laura Boothe 

Joelle Burleson 

Scott Davis 

Lynorae Benjamin 

Sincerely, 

<t>~C~~ Sheila C. Holman
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

___________

No. 22-50998

___________ Erma Wilson,

Plaintiff—Appellant ,

versus
Midland County, Texas; Weldon (Ralph) Petty, Jr., sued in his individual capacity ; Albert Schorre, Jr., sued in his individual capacity , Defendants—Appellees

.

______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Di strict of Texas USDC No. 7:22-CV-85

______________________________

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion December 14, 2023, 5 Cir., 2023, 89 F.4th 446)

Before Richman, Chief Judge , and Jones, Smith, Stewart, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson, Douglas and Ramirez, Circuit Judges

. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 14, 2024
Lyle W. Cayce ClerkNo. 22-50998

2 Per Curiam:
A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified ha ving voted in favor,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date he reafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinion in this case dated December 14, 2023,
is VACATED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5108 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5108

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 1213 East Houston Street in Cleveland, Texas, as the ``Lance 
          Corporal Robert A. Martinez Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL ROBERT A. MARTINEZ POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1213 East Houston Street in Cleveland, Texas, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Lance Corporal Robert A. Martinez Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lance 
Corporal Robert A. Martinez Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5108

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 1213 East Houston Street in Cleveland, Texas, as the ``Lance 
          Corporal Robert A. Martinez Post Office Building''.
```
|                                       |                                                                             |                                             |
|--------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                                       |                                                                             |
|                                  |                                                                        |                                        |
| Dated:               October 25, 2006 |                                                                             | /s/ Peter              M.              Kuhn |
|                                       |                                                                                  |
|                                       | Peter                M. Kuhn Chief                Executive Officer and Director |

|                                 |                                                                                          |                              |
|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                                 |                                                                                          |
|                            |                                                                                     |                         |
| Dated:              October 25, 2006 |                                                                                          | /s/ Nancy              Huber |
|                                 |                                                                                               |
|                                 | Nancy                Huber Chief                Financial Officer and                Director |
Terrance L. JAMES v. STATE of North Carolina

No. 536P00-9

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Terrance James, For James, Terrance L.

Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, For State of N.C.

*428***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 4th of March 2019 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Cleveland County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."

Ervin, J. recused
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5063 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit tax return preparers 

from requesting taxpayer consent to disclose or use return information. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 30, 2006 

Mr. EDWARDS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit 

tax return preparers from requesting taxpayer consent 

to disclose or use return information. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taxpayer Privacy Pro5 tection Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REQUESTS BY TAX RETURN PRE7 PARERS FOR TAXPAYER CONSENT TO DIS8 CLOSE AND USE RETURN INFORMATION. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7216 of the Internal Rev10 enue Code of 1986 (relating to disclosure or use of inforVerDate Aug 31 2005 18:40 Apr 04, 2006 Jkt 049196 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5063.IH H5063

rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5063 IH 

1 mation by preparers of returns) is amended by adding at 

2 the end the following new subsection: 

3 ‘‘(c) PROHIBITION ON REQUESTS FOR TAXPAYER

4 CONSENT.—A tax return preparer shall not request that 

5 the taxpayer consent to the disclosure or use of informa6 tion described in subsection (a) (including by providing an 

7 unrequested form to the taxpayer which provides for such 

8 consent) and the regulations prescribed under subsection 

9 (b)(3) shall not permit the disclosure or use of such infor10 mation on the basis of a consent obtained in response to 

11 such a request.’’. 

12 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

13 (1) Section 7216 of such Code, as amended by 

14 subsection (a), is further amended by inserting after 

15 subsection (c) the following new subsection: 

16 ‘‘(d) TAX RETURN PREPARER.—For purposes of this 

17 section, the term ‘tax return preparer’ means any person 

18 who is engaged in the business of preparing, or providing 

19 services in connection with the preparation of, returns of 

20 the tax imposed by chapter 1, or any person who for com21 pensation prepares any such return for any other per22 son.’’. 

23 (2) Subsection (a) of section 7216 of such Code 

24 is amended by striking ‘‘person who is engaged in 

25 the business of preparing, or providing services in 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5063 IH 

1 connection with the preparation of, returns of the 

2 tax imposed by chapter 1, or any person who for 

3 compensation prepares any such return for any 

4 other person, and’’ and inserting ‘‘tax return pre5 parer’’. 

6 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 this section shall apply to disclosures and uses after the 

8 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
First Amendment to Amended and Restated General Partnership Agreement



 Exhibit 10.22 
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO 

AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 GENERAL PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT OF 
 DCP SOUTHEAST TEXAS HOLDINGS, GP

 This First Amendment to Amended and Restated General Partnership Agreement of DCP Southeast Texas Holdings, GP (this
“Amendment”) is entered into effective as of January 1, 2011, by and among DCP SOUTHEAST TEXAS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Midstream Partner”), GAS SUPPLY RESOURCES HOLDINGS, INC., a
Delaware corporation (“GSRH”), and DCP PARTNERS SE TEXAS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “MLP Partner”). The Midstream Partner, GSRH, and the MLP Partner may be referred to herein collectively as the
“Partners” and individually as a “Partner”. 
 RECITALS 

WHEREAS, the Partners entered into that certain Amended and Restated General Partnership of DCP Southeast Texas Holdings, GP dated and effective
January 1, 2011 (the “Agreement”) (capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning given thereto in the Agreement); and 
 WHEREAS, the Partners desire to amend the Agreement to correct a mutual mistake set forth in the Agreement relative the computation of the Net Monthly Storage Revenue distributable and allocable
among the Partners. 
 NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,
the Partners agree as follows: 
 1. Amendment. The Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the definition of “Net Monthly
Storage Revenue” in its entirety and replacing it with the following language: 
 “Net Monthly Storage
Revenue” shall mean the product of (i) 0.3333 and (ii) the Monthly Storage Revenue, as decreased by the sum of (a) the MLP Storage G&A Expenses and (b) the MLP Storage Opex. 

2. Scope. The Agreement is amended solely to the extent provided above. In all other respects the Agreement is confirmed and shall continue in
full force and effect without any other amendment or modification. 
 [REMAINDER OF
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.] 







 ON THE DATE FIRST SET FORTH ABOVE, each of the undersigned has caused this Amendment to be duly executed and
delivered. 
  

			
	 DCP SOUTHEAST TEXAS, LLC
 By DCP Midstream, LLC
 Its Sole Member

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Wouter T. van Kempen

	Name:	 	Wouter T. van Kempen
	Title:	 	President, Midcontinent Business Unit and Chief Development Officer
	
	GAS SUPPLY RESOURCES HOLDINGS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Wouter T. van Kempen

	Name:	 	Wouter T. van Kempen
	Title:	 	President, Midcontinent Business Unit and Chief Development Officer
	
	DCP PARTNERS SE TEXAS LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Donald A. Baldridge

	Name:	 	Donald A. Baldridge
	Title:	 	Vice President, Business Development
No. 09-8672.

#### Stephanie Acierno, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 962, 130 S. Ct. 1567,

176 L. Ed. 2d 151,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1070.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 579 F.3d 694.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of HireRight, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey A. Wahba,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

 

·                  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

·                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 7, 2008 | By:    | /s/ JEFFREY A. WAHBA       |
|------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
|                   |   | Jeffrey A. Wahba,          |
| * *               |   | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

 

*Asigned original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

----