alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 42 (Thursday, March 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9637-9638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4627]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Announcement Regarding States Triggering ``On'' to the Second-
Tier of Emergency Unemployment Compensation 2008 (EUC08)

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 9638]]

SUMMARY: Announcement regarding states triggering ``on'' to the Second-
Tier of Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC08).
    Public Law 110-449 created a Second-Tier of benefits for qualified 
unemployed workers claiming benefits in high unemployment states. The 
Department of Labor produces a trigger notice indicating which states 
qualify for the Second-Tier of EUC08 benefits and provides the 
beginning and ending dates of the Second-Tier period for each 
qualifying state. The trigger notice covering state eligibility for the 
Second-Tier of the EUC08 program can be found at: http://ows.doleta.gov/unemploy/claims_arch.asp. A new trigger notice is 
posted at this location each week that the program is in effect.
    Beginning February 15, 2009, the following states are in a high 
unemployment period, resulting in their triggering ``on'' to the 
Second-Tier of the EUC08 program: Montana and Vermont.

Information for Claimants

    The duration of benefits payable in the EUC program, and the terms 
and conditions under which they are payable, are governed by Public 
Laws 110-252 and 110-449, and the operating instructions issued to the 
states by the U.S. Department of Labor. The State Workforce Agency in 
states beginning a high unemployment period, will furnish a written 
notice of potential entitlement to each individual who is potentially 
eligible for Second-Tier EUC08 benefits.
    Persons who believe they may be entitled to additional benefits 
under the EUC08 program or who wish to inquire about their rights under 
the program should contact their State Workforce Agency.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Gibbons, U.S. Department of 
Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Office of Workforce 
Security, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Frances Perkins Bldg., Room S-
4231, Washington, DC 20210, telephone number (202) 693-3008 (this is 
not a toll-free number) or by e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b0d7d9d2d2dfdec39ec3d3dfc4c4f0d4dfdc9ed7dfc6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ec8b858e8e83829fc29f8f839898ac888380c28b839a">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 26th day of February 2009.
Douglas F. Small,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-4627 Filed 3-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FW-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1


                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oxford Ventures, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Daniel K. Leonard, as
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


By:  /s/ Daniel K. Leonard
--------------------------

Daniel K. Leonard
President and CEO
May 26, 2004
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, E. Wayne Jackson, III, certify that:     1.      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Sourcefire, Inc.;     2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4.      The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a.      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     b.      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     c.      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5.      The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a.      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b.      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 3, 2007 By:  /s/E. Wayne Jackson, III     Name:  E. Wayne Jackson, III    Title:  Chief Executive Officer
#### Israel Mandelovitz, Appellant, v Denise M. Rockofsky et al., Respondents.

[719 NYS2d 672]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jones, J.), entered September 20, 1999, which, upon a jury verdict, and upon the denial of his motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside the verdict and for judgment in his favor as a matter of law, is in favor of the defendants and against him, dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The trial court properly denied the plaintiffs motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside the verdict, as the jury finding in favor of the defendants could have been reached on a fair interpretation of the evidence *(see, Nicastro v Park,*113 AD2d 129, 134). The defendants presented evidence that the defendant driver Denise M. Rockofsky saw the plaintiff walking in the roadway in the middle of the block on the double yellow line from half a block away, that she sounded her horn and slowed her vehicle, and that the plaintiff then suddenly turned and ran in front of her vehicle. Upon being presented with this evidence, which conflicted sharply with the plaintiffs testimony and thereby created a factual dispute, the jury “resolved the controversy in favor of the defendant^] upon a fair interpretation of the evidence, [and] that finding should be sustained” *(Nicastro v Park, supra,*at 134; *see also, Justice v Mendon Leasing Corp.,*248 AD2d 443). The jury reasonably could have concluded that Rockofsky was not negligent *(see, Justice v Mendon Leasing Corp.,*supra;*Shachnow v Myers,*229 AD2d 432).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, Acting P. J., O’Brien, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
STATE v. Ben Lee CAPPS

206A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 5, 2019

Nicholas C. Woomer-Deters, Assistant Appellate Defender, Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, for Capps, Ben Lee.

Michelle F. Lynch, GAL Appellate Counsel, Vinston Walton, Associate Attorney General, Kristin Jo Uicker, Assistant Attorney General, Ted Bell, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of June 2019 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of June 2019."
No. 09-9294.

#### Kent Anthony Krueger, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

559 U.S. 1096, 130 S. Ct. 2381,

176 L. Ed. 2d 775,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3564.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### W. R. Watkins, *Appellant,*v. Irene Herring, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed April 3, 1928.

*691
      *L. D. McGregor,*for Appellant;

*Hampton, Bull*and *Pencke,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Mortgage foreclosure proceedings were brought by Irene Herring against Henry Donaldson, W. R. Watkins and W. R. Watkins, Trustee for L. R. Curry, and L. R. Curry and his wife, Rose Curry. The mortgage debt was represented by notes signed by Henry Donaldson, Trustee. The bill of complaint alleges that “one W. R. Watkins, Trustee for L. R. Curry, purchased the above described property, as per deed recorded in deed book No. 586, page No. 217, and in doing so assumed and agreed to pay the above described mortgage. ’ ’

W. R. Watkins demurred to the bill of complaint on the ground that there is a misjoinder of parties as to the defendant, W. R. Watkins. The demurrer was overruled and W. R. Watkins appealed.

The bill of complaint alleges that “W. R. Watkins, Trustee for L. R. Curry,” purchased the property, “and in doing so assumed and agreed to pay the above described mortgage.” This allegation is not negatived by any other part of the bill of complaint; and it is manifestly sufficient as against the demurrer to show that W. R. Watkins is a proper party in the suit.

If W. R. Watkins with the added personal description “Trustee for L. R. Curry,” did assume and agree to pay the mortgage as alleged, the undertaking as alleged in this record is apparently personal, and may not be dependent *692upon the nature of the title taken by W. B. Watkins when he “purchased” the property.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
No. 85-6498.

#### Cardinal *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
STATE of North Carolina v. Robert Paul DELAIR

No. 30P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2019

C. Melissa Owen, Attorney at Law, Cheyenne N. Chambers, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Delair, Robert Paul

Anne J. Brown, Special Deputy Attorney General, Roxann L. Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of January 2019 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

*27"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 22nd of January 2019 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd of January 2019 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."

Davis, J. recused
No. 09M86.

#### Oscar Roy Doster, Petitioner v. Texas.

559 U.S. 1091, 130 S. Ct. 2396,

176 L. Ed. 2d 766,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3666.

April 26, 2010.

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis without an affidavit of indigency executed by petitioner granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5245 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5245

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   1 Marble Street in Fair Haven, Vermont, as the ``Matthew Lyon Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MATTHEW LYON POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1 Marble Street in Fair Haven, Vermont, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Matthew Lyon Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Matthew 
Lyon Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
# C_2017409EN.01000101.xml

| 1.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8670 — CDPQ/GE/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 409/01)

On 17 November 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8670. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8670. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
CHAVEZ, et al. v. CARMICHAEL

437PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 31, 2019

Sean F. Perrin, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Carmichael, Irwin (Sheriff).

Sejal Zota, Attorney at Law, for Chavez, Carlos, et al.

Erez Reuveni, Attorney at Law, for United States.

Joshua S. Press, Attorney at Law, for United States.

W. Rob Heroy, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Chavez, Carlos, et al.

Gill P. Beck, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for United States.

Deborah Weissman, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Law Scholars and National Immigrant Justice Center.

Raul A. Pinto, Attorney at Law, for North Carolina Justice Center.

Irena Como, Attorney at Law, for ACLU, et al.

Cody Wofsy, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for ACLU, et al.

Daniel Galindo, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for ACLU, et al.

Omar Jadwat, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for ACLU, et al.

Spencer Amdur, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for ACLU, et al.

Katrina Braun, Attorney at Law, for ACLU, et al.

R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*907The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief Reply Brief filed on the 31st of July 2019 by Petitioners:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 31st of July 2019."

Petitioners shall have up to and including the 26th day of August 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
No. 09-9742.

#### Manuel Hernandez-Hernandez, aka Manuel Ernesto Hernandez-Hernandez, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1085, 130 S. Ct. 2135,

176 L. Ed. 2d 753,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3233.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 356 Fed. Appx. 717.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T M A RI A D E LO S A N G ELES ZEN D EJ A S, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 73400 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 447- 695 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r19, 2010 ** B e f o r e : O ’S C A N N L A I N , L E A V Y , an dT A L L M A N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . M ar i aD e L os A nge l e s Z e nde j a s , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ or de rdi s m i s s i ng he rappe a l f r om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng he rappl i c a t i on f ora dj us tm e ntof s t a tus . O urj ur i s di c t i on i s gove rne d by8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w de novo 

# FI LED NO V 01 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 73400 2 q u e s tio n s o f

law , an df

o rs ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e th e a g e n c y ’s f in d in g s o f

f a c t. B lan co v. Mukasey , 518 F . 3d 714, 718 ( 9th C i r . 2008) . W e de nyi n parta nd d is m is s in p art th e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . C ontr aryt o Z e nde

j a s ’ a s s e rt i on, the I Jdi d notvi ol a t e due pr oc e s s by a d m ittin g th e d o c u m e n ts p r e s e n te db yth e D e p artm e n t o f H o m e lan dS e c u r ityto s how Z e nde

j a s ha d m a de af

a l s e c l a i m t o U ni t e d S t a t e s c i t i z e ns hi p on June 23, 19 99 , because the do cum ent s w er e probat i ve and thei r a dm i ss i on w as f u n d a m e n ta llyf

a ir . Se e Es

p i n o z a v . I

NS , 4 5 F .3 d3 0 8 , 3 1 0 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 5 ) . S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e a g e n c y ’s d e te rm in a tio n th a t Z e n d e ja s is i nadm i ss i bl e, and there fore i nel i gi bl e f or adj ustm entof st atus, w here the re cord i ndi c a t e s s he m a de af

a l s e c l a i m t o U ni t e d S t a t e s c i t i z e ns hi p t o ga i n e ntryt o the U n ite dS ta te s in 1 9 9 9 . Se e Pi c h a rdo v . I NS , 216 F . 3d 1198, 1201 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( f a l s e c l a i m t o U ni t e d S t a t e s c i t i z e ns hi p i s a“ non- w a i vabl e gr ound of i nadm i ss i bi l i ty” un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 18 2(a) (6)( C )( i i )) . W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew Z endej as ’ chal l enge t o h er19 99 expedi t ed r e m o v a l o r d e r . See 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( A ) ; A v e n da n o - R a m ir ezv . A s h c r o ft , 365 F .3 d8 1 3 , 8 1 8 - 1 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Studio One Media, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB /A, First Amendment,  for the period ending June 30, 2007,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Kenneth R. Pinckard, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/   Kenneth
      R. Pinckard
              ------------------------------
              Kenneth
      R. Pinckard
              Principal
      Accounting Officer
              May
      27, 2008







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-KSB solely pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed
as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly  report of Basic Empire  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Chang
Yu,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been provided to Basic Empire  Corporation  and will be retained by Basic Empire
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

Date:  May __, 2005                     By: /s/ Chang Yu
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Chang Yu
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President