alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Unassociated Document







Exhibit 10.27







Escalade, Incorporated




Schedule of Executive Officer Compensation







Compensation for the executive officers of Escalade, Incorporated consists of a base salary, bonuses and long-term incentives in the form of stock option grants or restricted stock unit grants.







Base Salary




In general, base salaries are set at the beginning of each year based upon changes in the employee’s level of responsibility, individual performance reviews conducted by the Company’s Compensation Committee and changes in the cost of living.







Bonuses




The Company’s Compensation Committee has established a profit incentive plan that provides for the payment of cash bonuses if certain performance targets are achieved. Under the plan, the Compensation Committee establishes target performance levels early in each fiscal year, subject to potential changes that the Committee may determine appropriate. Virtually all employees are eligible to participate in the profit incentive plan. In conjunction with the completion of the Company’s annual audited financial statements, the bonus pool is finalized based on actual results achieved. Allocation of the bonus pool to individual executive officers is determined at the Compensation Committee’s discretion based upon a review of the overall Company’s performance relative to budget, the Company’s strategic position, and individual executive officer’s performance relative to budget. There are no pre-defined methods for allocating the bonus pool to any of the Company’s executive officers.







Long-Term Incentives




Under the terms of the Escalade, Incorporated 2007 Incentive Plan, executive officers of the Company are eligible to receive long term incentive compensation in various forms including stock options and restricted stock units. The Company’s Compensation Committee has full discretion over the form, amount and timing of these grants which historically have been annual grants. In its determination of annul grants, the Compensation Committee considers performance of both the individual and the Company.







Additional Benefits




Executive officers are eligible to participate in the Company’s 401(k) retirement plan and receive Company matching contributions in accordance with the plan terms. The Company also pays group term life insurance benefits on behalf of executive officers. The Company’s Chairman of the Board, Robert Griffin, participated in a salary deferral plan that earned interest on undistributed amounts at the rate of 9% per annum. The entire balance of this plan was distributed to Mr. Griffin in a taxable transaction in April 2010.
Exhibit 99.02
                                                   EXHIBIT D
                 FORM OF ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE
                   MBNA AMERICA BANK, N.A.
                   
                   
              MBNA MASTER CREDIT CARD TRUST II
                              
                              
         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative
of MBNA America Bank, N.A. (the "Bank"), as Servicer
pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of
August 4, 1994 (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") by
and between the Bank and The Bank of New York, as trustee,
(the "Trustee") does hereby certify that:
         1.  The Bank is Servicer under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement.
         2.  The undersigned is duly authorized pursuant to
the Pooling and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver
this Certificate to the Trustee.
        3.  This Certificate is delivered pursuant to
Section 3.05 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.
         4.  A review of the activities of the Servicer
during the twelve month period ended June 30, 1996 was
conducted under my supervision.
         5.  Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the
best of my knowledge, fully performed all its obligations
under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout such
twelve month period and no default in the performance of
such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set
forth in paragraph 6 below.
         6.  The following is a description of each default
in the performance of the Servicer's obligations under the
provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement known to
me to have been made during the twelve month period ended
June 30, 1996,  which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of
each such default, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if
any, to remedy each such default and (iii) the current
status of each such default:
                           "None"
        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly
executed this Certificate this 26th day of August, 1996.


                                       Marguerite M. Boylan
                              Name:    Marguerite M. Boylan
                              Title:      Vice President
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 31.2
                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. Section 1350
             UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jay Ostrow, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of XRG, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Other than as disclosed in Item 3, designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 30, 2005               /s/ Jay Ostrow
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Jay Ostrow
                                    Principal Accounting Officer and Controller
No. 09-7259.

#### Deborah Redman, Petitioner v. Potomac Place Associates, LLC.

559 U.S. 1088, 130 S. Ct. 2142,

176 L. Ed. 2d 759,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3182.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

*760Former decision, 558 U.S. 1121, 130 S. Ct. 1071, 175 L. Ed. 2d 900, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 237.
DICESARE, et al. v. The CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY

156A17-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2019

Russ Ferguson, III, Attorney at Law, James P. Cooney, III, Attorney at Law, Mark J. Horoschak, Attorney at Law, Brian Allen Hayles, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority.

Sarah Motley Stone, Attorney at Law, Debbie W. Harden, Attorney at Law, Michael P. Fischer, Attorney at Law, Matthew Tilley, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Hampton Y. Dellinger, Attorney at Law, for The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, d/b/a Carolinas Healthcare System.

Reynolds Michael Elliot, Attorney at Law, for DiCesare, Christopher, et al.

Linwood Jones, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for N.C. Hospital Association.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd of June 2019 by Plaintiffs to admit Adam Gitlin Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Ocean Research and Resources Advisory Panel (ORRAP) will hold a regularly scheduled meeting, which will be open to the public. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Monday, April 6, 2009, from 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. and Tuesday, April 7, 2009, from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. Members of the public should submit their comments one week in advance of the meeting to the meeting Point of Contact. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held in the offices of the Consortium of Ocean Leadership, 1201 New York Avenue NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Charles L. Vincent, Office of Naval Research, 875 North Randolph Street Suite 1425, Arlington, VA 22203-1995, telephone: 703-696-4118. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This notice of open meeting is provided in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2). The meeting will include discussions on coastal hazards, fishery management initiatives, ocean science policy, ocean observations, ocean mapping, education, and other current issues in the ocean science and resource management communities. 

Dated: March 6, 2009. 

T. M. Cruz, 

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Alternate Federal Register Officer.

 [FR Doc. E9-5345 Filed 3-11-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Dejuan Antonio YOURSE, Defendant.

No. COA18-776

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 6, 2019

NO ERROR.
STATE of North Carolina v. Carl Ray POORE, Jr.

No 227P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Daniel K. Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Poore, Carl Ray (Jr.)

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Tom Horner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd of July 2018 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 23rd of July 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd of July 2018 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
H. R. 5107

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and six 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1400 West 

Jordan Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ‘‘Earl D. Hutto Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1400 West Jordan Street in Pensacola, Florida, shall be known 

and designated as the ‘‘Earl D. Hutto Post Office Building’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Earl D. 

Hutto Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         203,073
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,608
<ALLOWANCES>                                   215,743
<INVENTORY>                                     89,458
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               357,586
<PP&E>                                       2,144,557
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,007,317
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,408,919
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          348,058
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  3,503,793
<COMMON>                                        26,712
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,794,644)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,408,919
<SALES>                                      1,083,897
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,083,897
<CGS>                                          841,805
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,183,042
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                94,697
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             111,446
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,035,647)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,035,647)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32**

AMANASU TECHNO HOLDINGS CORPORATION**Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer			Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,			As Adopted Pursuant to			Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

		  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of          the registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the registrant's          Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the "Form          10Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form          10Q, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition          and results of operations of the registrant.		

 Dated: November 18, 2008
			 By: /s/ Yukinori Yoshino					Yukinori Yoshino					President
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Optigenex Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Richard
S. Serbin, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the
Chief Executive Officer of Optigenex Inc. with the requirements of Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used for any other purposes. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Optigenex Inc. and will be retained by Optigenex Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                            /s/ Richard S. Serbin
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Richard S. Serbin
                                            Chief Executive Officer

Dated: January 21, 2005
No. 09-8581.

#### Joshua Joseph Tyler, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 996, 130 S. Ct. 1746,

176 L. Ed. 2d 219,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2263.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 349 Fed. Appx. 200.
No. 09-263.

#### Sandra Ferguson, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

559 U.S. 991, 130 S. Ct. 1735,

176 L. Ed. 2d 211,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2299.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 563 F.3d 1254.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth Hicks, of Argentex Mining Corporation,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Argentex Mining
Corporation for the interim period ended April 30, 2008 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Argentex Mining Corporation

Dated: June 16, 2008

/s/ Kenneth Hicks Kenneth Hicks President and
Director (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Argentex Mining
Corporation and will be retained by Argentex Mining Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
No. 09-8754.

#### David Earl Kates, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1094, 130 S. Ct. 2372,

176 L. Ed. 2d 771,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3544.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 350 Fed. Appx. 902.
# C_2017250EN.01002101.xml

| 1.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 250/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 250/21

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8498 — Toray/Mitsui/Soda)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 250/04)

On 24 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8498. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8498. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---