alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w2w82






Exhibit 10.2.82




GENON ENERGY, INC. 2002 STOCK PLAN

(As Established Effective March 1, 2002)




Termination Amendment



          GenOn Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation, formerly known as RRI Energy, Inc. (the
“Company”), having established the GenOn Energy, Inc. 2002 Stock Plan, as established effective
March 1, 2002, and as thereafter amended (the “Plan”), and having reserved the right under Section
12 thereof to amend and terminate the Plan, does hereby amend and terminate the Plan, effective as
of the dates set forth below:




          1. Effective as of December 3, 2010, the Plan is hereby amended (i) to change the name of the
Plan to the “GenOn Energy, Inc. 2002 Stock Plan,” (ii) to change all references in the Plan to RRI
Energy, Inc. with GenOn Energy, Inc., and (iii) as otherwise necessary to reflect the foregoing.




          2. Effective as of December 3, 2010, the Plan is hereby terminated by adding the following new
paragraph 20 to the Plan:





     “20. Termination. This Plan is terminated as December 3, 2010 (the
‘Termination Date’), and no further awards shall be granted on or after the
Termination Date; provided, however, that any Awards outstanding as of the
Termination Date shall remain outstanding and subject to the terms and conditions of
this Plan and the applicable Award Agreements.”



          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, GenOn Energy, Inc. has caused these presents to be executed by its duly
authorized officer in a number of copies, all of which shall constitute one and the same
instrument, which may be sufficiently evidenced by any executed copy thereof, this 8th day
of December, 2010, but effective as of the dates set forth above.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	GENON ENERGY, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Karen D. Taylor
 	 
	 	 	Karen D. Taylor 	 
	 	 	Senior Vice President-Human Resources

and Administration
No. 09-9905.

#### Gary Alexander Matthews, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1113, 130 S. Ct. 2420,

176 L. Ed. 2d 935,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3864.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 09-6811.

#### Linell Leonard Dumas, Jr., Petitioner v. R. K. Wong, Warden.

559 U.S. 988, 130 S. Ct. 1733,

176 L. Ed. 2d 208,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1943.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1079, 130 S. Ct. 799, 175 L. Ed. 2d 563, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 8891.
----

| Name of Company                                         | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
|---------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                                                    |                          |
| Synergetics, Inc.                                       | Missouri                      |
|                                                    |                          |
| Synergetics IP, Inc.                                    | Delaware                      |
|                                                    |                          |
| Synergetics Delaware, Inc.                              | Delaware                      |
|                                                    |                          |
| Synergetics Development Company, L.L.C.                 | Missouri                      |
| (Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Synergetics, Inc.)          |                          |
|                                                    |                          |
| Medimold, L.L.C.                                        | Missouri                      |
| (Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Synergetics, Inc.)          |                          |
|                                                    |                          |
| Synergetics Germany GmbH                                | Germany                       |
| (Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Synergetics Delaware, Inc.) |                          |
|                                                    |                          |
| Synergetics Italia, Srl                                 | Italy                         |
| (Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Synergetics Delaware, Inc.) |                          |
|                                                    |                          |
| Synergetics Surgical Australia PTY, Ltd.                | Australia                     |
| (Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Synergetics Delaware, Inc.) |                          |
|                                                    |                          |
| Synergetics France, SARL                                | France                        |
| (Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Synergetics Delaware, Inc.) |                          |

----
83/27/2012 15:03 9072712800 FAA 

FEDERAL AVIATION AOMINISTRA TION 

Alaskan Region 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

222 West Seventh Avenue, Box 14 

Anchorage, Alaska 99513 

PH: (907) 271-5269 FAX: (907) 271-2800 

FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET 

TO: llearing Docket Clerk 

FAX No: (202) 493-5020 

FROM: Glenn H. Brown, Esq. 

RE: Ice Cold, INc. 

FAA Docket No. 2011-AWA-CPP-02588 

FDMS No. FAA-2011-1288 

Number of pages (not includin~ this cover sheet): - 2 -

Complainant's Withdrawal Of Motions 

PAGE 01/03 
03/27/2012 15:03 9072712800 FAA 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER Of 

ICE COJ,D, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. 2011-AWA-CPP-02588 

(Civil P~nalty Proceeding) 

l'DMS NO, FAA-2011·1288 

COMPLAlNANT'S WITHDRAWAL OF MOTIONS 

PAGE 02/03 

By motions ~erved on March 20,2012, Complainant moved for orders deeming certain 

requests for admission admitted and compeU\ng Respondent to respond to certain other 

discovery requests. Complainant has now learned that the copy of the discovery request served 

on Respondent on January 27, 2012, did not include the first two pages. Complainant's motions 

are, therefore, premature, and Complainant hereby withdraws them. 1 

R~spcctfully submitted this 28111 day of March 2012. 

HOWARD L. MARTIN, JR. 

Regional Counsel 

By: .:JL.':-:!"-' (h--"'-- Gienn H. BroW11. 

Senior Attorney 

1 The two missing pages were haTided to Respondent's president on March 26.20 1.2. 
03/27/2012 15:03 9072712800 FAA 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

Re; Ice Cold. lnc. 

FAA Docket No. 2011-A W A-CPP-02588 

FDMS NO. FAA-2011-1288 

PAGE 03/03 

I hereby certify that on this date I have served a copy of the COMPLAINANT'S . 

WITHDM WAL OF·MOTJONS by postage-prepaid. certified mall, return receipt requested, 

to the following: 

Th~ Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

ot11ce ofHeadngs, M-20; 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Jim Wolgemuth, President 

Ice Cold. Inc., Respondent 

2020 Belmont Drive 

Anchorage. AK 99517 

1 further certify tllat on this date l ha.ve served the original and one copy of the 

COMPLAINANT'S WJTHDRA W AL OF MOTIONS by postage-prepaid, certi.fied mail, 

retum ,·eceipt requested and facsimile, addressed as follows: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington. DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 000 

DATED: -?'?-G· .,2 ':{ ..:20 / :.:2_ 

/).....L ' ' /7,/ . ) 

/(dLf-£./tc.cr d;.x L'J-1:~~-<?.I·- t·ederal Avta!ton Adm'tmstratton / · /, 

Office of Regional Counsel rl t 

222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14, AAL-7 

Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7587 

2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5104 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5104

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 20, 2006

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1750 16th Street South in St. Petersburg, Florida, as the ``Morris 
                        W. Milton Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MORRIS W. MILTON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1750 16th Street South in St. Petersburg, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Morris W. Milton Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Morris W. 
Milton Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 19, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. 09-10106.

#### Demarc Burton, Petitioner v. United States.

560 U.S. 915, 130 S. Ct. 3302,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1203,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4052.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 359 Fed. Appx. 430.
# C_2017377EN.01000502.xml

| 9.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 377/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 377/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7764 — EDF/Areva reactor business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 377/05)

On 29 May 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M7764. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M7764. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4986 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4986

  To amend title 46, United States Code, to require the Secretary of 
Homeland Security to prioritize maritime transportation security grants 
 based on the risks and vulnerabilities of ports and the proximity of 
     ports to critical infrastructure or urban or sensitive areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2006

Mr. Frelinghuysen introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 46, United States Code, to require the Secretary of 
Homeland Security to prioritize maritime transportation security grants 
 based on the risks and vulnerabilities of ports and the proximity of 
     ports to critical infrastructure or urban or sensitive areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRIORITY IN AWARDING MARITIME TRANSPORTATION SECURITY 
              GRANTS.

    Subsection (a) of section 70107 of title 46, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``(a) In General.--
            ``(1) Establishment of grant program.--The Secretary shall 
        establish a grant program for making a fair and equitable 
        allocation of funds to implement Area Maritime Transportation 
        Security Plans and facility security plans among port 
        authorities, facility operators, and State and local government 
        agencies required to provide port security services. Before 
        awarding a grant under the program, the Secretary shall provide 
        for review and comment by the appropriate Federal Maritime 
        Security Coordinators and the Maritime Administrator. In 
        administering the grant program, the Secretary shall take into 
        account national economic and strategic defense concerns.
            ``(2) Priority in awarding grants.--In awarding a grant 
        under the grant program established under subsection (a), the 
        Secretary shall prioritize port authorities, facility 
        operators, and State or local government agencies that provide 
        port security based on--
                    ``(A) the risks and vulnerabilities of the port for 
                which the port authority, facility operator, or State 
                or local government agency provides security; and
                    ``(B) the proximity of such port to critical 
                infrastructure or to an urban or sensitive area.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5107 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5107

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1400 West Jordan Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ``Earl D. 
                     Hutto Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2006

 Mr. Miller of Florida (for himself, Mr. Meek of Florida, Mr. Davis of 
   Florida, Mr. Foley, Mr. Boyd, Mr. Mack, Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of 
Florida, Ms. Harris, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Feeney, Mr. Lincoln Diaz-Balart 
of Florida, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Stearns, Mr. Putnam, Mr. Hastings of 
  Florida, Mr. Weldon of Florida, Mr. Mica, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Mario 
 Diaz-Balart of Florida, Mr. Wexler, Mr. Keller, Mr. Young of Florida, 
  Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Mr. Shaw, and Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1400 West Jordan Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ``Earl D. 
                     Hutto Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EARL D. HUTTO POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1400 West Jordan Street in Pensacola, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Earl D. Hutto Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Earl D. 
Hutto Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
```
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cirracor, Inc. a Nevada corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Reed Fisher, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Cirracor, Inc., and will be retained by Cirracor, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Reed Fisher
--------------------------
Reed Fisher
Chief Executive Officer
August 4, 2006
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from Everest
"Futures Fund, L.P. for the year ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by" reference to such 10-K.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                      0000837919
<NAME>                                     EVEREST FUTURES FUND L P

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                     22362749
<SECURITIES>                               18867562
<RECEIVABLES>                              618294
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           41848605
<PP&E>                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             41848605
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1867995
<BONDS>                                    0
<COMMON>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                 39980610
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               41848605
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           (7740535)
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              2077103
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           104654
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9712984)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9712984)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9712984)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (405.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (405.66)



</TABLE>
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |                                                   |   |
|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| May 12, 2011 |                                                   |   |
|         | /s/ Stephen T. Lundy                                   |   |
|         | Stephen T. Lundy,Chief Executive Officer and President |   |
|         |                                                   |   |

|         |                                         |   |
|--------------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
| May 12, 2011 |                                         |   |
|         | /s/ Jeffrey G. McGonegal                     |   |
|         | Jeffrey G. McGonegal,Chief Financial Officer |   |
|         |                                         |   |
# C_2017292EN.01000101.xml

| 2.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 24 August 2017

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of the Banco de Portugal

(ECB/2017/24)

(2017/C 292/01)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | The mandate of the Banco de Portugal’s current external auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers & Associados — Sociedade de Revisores Oficiais de Contas, Lda. ended after the audit for the financial year 2016. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2017. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of the Banco de Portugal’s current external auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers & Associados — Sociedade de Revisores Oficiais de Contas, Lda. ended after the audit for the financial year 2016. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2017.

| (3) | Banco de Portugal has selected Deloitte & Associados — Sociedade de Revisores Oficiais de Contas S.A. as its external auditors for the financial years 2017 to 2021, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Banco de Portugal has selected Deloitte & Associados — Sociedade de Revisores Oficiais de Contas S.A. as its external auditors for the financial years 2017 to 2021,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that Deloitte & Associados — Sociedade de Revisores Oficiais de Contas S.A. should be appointed as the external auditors of Banco de Portugal for the financial years 2017 to 2021.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 24 August 2017.

The President of the ECB

Mario DRAGHI

---
No. 09-9799.

#### Frederick Lee Irons, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1099, 130 S. Ct. 2390,

176 L. Ed. 2d 780,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3537.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Mr. William WOODY, Plaintiff, v. FLIGHTGEST, INC. and John Doe 1-10, Defendants.

FlightGest, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Muncie Aviation Company, Third-Party Defendant.

No. COA18-940

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 21, 2019

AFFIRMED.
No. 09-1136.

#### William Magdalin, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

559 U.S. 1093, 130 S. Ct. 2388,

176 L. Ed. 2d 769,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3580.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.