52174 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 167 / Friday, August 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

positive account balance will be 

considered enrolled prior to September 

5, 2015 for purposes of this paragraph; 

(5) All deposits made on behalf of a 

participant first enrolled on or after 

September 5, 2015 who does not have 

a contribution allocation in effect will 

be invested in the age-appropriate TSP 

Lifecycle Fund; and 

(6) Once a contribution allocation 

becomes effective, it remains in effect 

until it is superseded by a subsequent 

contribution allocation or the 

participant’s account balance is reduced 

to zero. If a rehired participant has a 

positive account balance and a 

contribution allocation in effect, then 

the participant’s contribution allocation 

will remain in effect until a new 

allocation is made. If, however, the 

participant has a zero account balance, 

then the participant’s contributions will 

be allocated to the age-appropriate TSP 

Lifecycle Fund until a new allocation is 

made. 

* * * * * 

§ 1601.22 [Amended] 

■ 5. Amend § 1601.22 by removing 

paragraph (a)(3). 

■ 6. Amend § 1601.33 by revising the 

first sentence of paragraph (a), to read as 

follows: 

§ 1601.33 Acknowledgement of risk. 

(a) A uniformed services participant 

or a participant enrolled prior to 

September 5, 2015 who wants to invest 

in a TSP Fund other than the G Fund 

must execute an acknowledgement of 

risk for that fund. * * * 

* * * * * 

PART 1651—DEATH BENEFITS 

■ 7. The authority citation for part 1651 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 8424(d), 8432d, 8432(j), 

8433(e), 8435(c)(2), 8474(b)(5) and 8474(c)(1). 

■ 8. Amend § 1651.2 by revising the last 

sentence of paragraph (d) to read as 

follows: 

§ 1651.2 Entitlement to funds in a 

deceased participant’s account. 

* * * * * 

(d) * * * The account will accrue 

earnings at the G Fund rate in 

accordance with 5 CFR part 1645 until 

it is paid out or a beneficiary participant 

account is established under this part. 

■ 3. Amend § 1651.19, by revising the 

first sentence of paragraph (a) to read as 

follows: 

§ 1651.19 Beneficiary participant 

accounts. 

* * * * * 

(a) * * * Regardless of the allocation 

of the deceased participant’s account 

balance at the time of his or her death, 

each beneficiary participant account, 

once established, will be allocated 100 

percent to the age-appropriate TSP 

Lifecycle Fund based on the beneficiary 

participant’s date of birth. * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2015–21302 Filed 8–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6760–01–P 

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES 

SAFETY BOARD 

10 CFR Part 1703 

FOIA Fee Schedule Update 

AGENCY: Defense Nuclear Facilities 

Safety Board. 

ACTION: Establishment of FOIA Fee 

Schedule. 

SUMMARY: The Defense Nuclear 

Facilities Safety Board is publishing its 

Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Fee 

Schedule Update pursuant to the 

Board’s regulations. 

DATES: Effective September 1, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mark T. Welch, General Manager, 

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 

625 Indiana Avenue NW., Suite 700, 

Washington, DC 20004–2901, (202) 694– 

7060. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FOIA 

requires each Federal agency covered by 

the Act to specify a schedule of fees 

applicable to processing of requests for 

agency records. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(i). 

On July 9, 2015 the Board published for 

comment in the Federal Register its 

Proposed FOIA Fee Schedule, 80 FR 

39389. No comments were received in 

response to that notice, and the Board 

is now establishing the Fee Schedule. 

Pursuant to 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(6) of 

the Board’s regulations, the Board’s 

General Manager will update the FOIA 

Fee Schedule once every 12 months. 

The previous Fee Schedule Update went 

into effect on June 1, 2014. 79 FR 31848. 

Board Action 

Accordingly, the Board issues the 

following schedule of updated fees for 

services performed in response to FOIA 

requests: 

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR FOIA SERVICES

[Implementing 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(6)] 

Search or Review Charge ........................................................................ $85.00 per hour. 

Copy Charge (paper) ................................................................................ $.05 per page, if done in-house, or generally available commercial rate 

approximately $.10 per page). 

Electronic Media ....................................................................................... $5.00 per electronic media. 

Copy Charge (audio and video cassette) ................................................ Actual commercial rates. 

Duplication of DVD ................................................................................... $25.00 for each individual DVD; $16.50 for each duplicate DVD. 

Copy Charge for large documents (e.g., maps, diagrams) ..................... Actual commercial rates. 

Dated: August 21, 2015. 

Mark T. Welch, 

General Manager. 

[FR Doc. 2015–21413 Filed 8–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3670–01–P 


Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 167 / Friday, August 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 52175 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2015–0822; Directorate 

Identifier 2014–NM–210–AD; Amendment 

39–18248; AD 2015–17–15] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, 

Inc. Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–2C10 

(Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702) 

airplanes, Model CL–600–2D15 

(Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes, 

Model CL–600–2D24 (Regional Jet 

Series 900) airplanes, and Model CL– 

600–2E25 (Regional Jet Series 1000) 

airplanes. This AD was prompted by 

results of a design review indicating that 

the burst pressure of the flexible hose, 

used to vent oxygen from the highpressure relief valve of the oxygen 

cylinder overboard, was lower than the 

opening pressure of the high-pressure 

relief valve, which could cause the 

flexible hose to burst before it can vent 

the excess oxygen overboard. This AD 

requires replacing the oxygen hose 

assembly with a new, improved 

assembly. We are issuing this AD to 

prevent the accumulation of oxygen in 

an enclosed space, which could result 

in an uncontrolled oxygen-fed fire if an 

ignition source is nearby. 

DATES: This AD becomes effective 

October 2, 2015. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of certain publications listed in this AD 

as of October 2, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD 

docket on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov/

#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2015-0822 or in 

person at the Docket Management 

Facility, U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC. 

For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 

Coˆte-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Que ́bec 

H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514–855– 

5000; fax 514–855–7401; email thd.crj@

aero.bombardier.com; Internet http://

www.bombardier.com. You may view 

this referenced service information at 

the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 

Renton, WA. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, 

call 425–227–1221. It is also available 

on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2015– 

0822. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer, 

Airframe and Mechanical Systems 

Branch, ANE–171, FAA, New York 

Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 

Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, 

NY 11590; telephone (516) 228–7318; 

fax (516) 794–5531. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 by adding an AD that would 

apply to certain Bombardier, Inc. Model 

CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 

701, & 702) airplanes, Model CL–600– 

2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes, 

Model CL–600–2D24 (Regional Jet 

Series 900) airplanes, and Model CL– 

600–2E25 (Regional Jet Series 1000) 

airplanes. The NPRM published in the 

Federal Register on April 13, 2015 

(80 FR 19574). 

Transport Canada Civil Aviation 

(TCCA), which is the airworthiness 

authority for Canada, has issued 

Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF– 

2014–37, dated October 17, 2014 

(referred to after this as the Mandatory 

Continuing Airworthiness Information, 

or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe 

condition for certain Bombardier, Inc. 

Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet 

Series 700, 701, & 702) airplanes, Model 

CL–600–2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) 

airplanes, Model CL–600–2D24 

(Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes, and 

Model CL–600–2E25 (Regional Jet Series 

1000) airplanes. The MCAI states: 

Design review found that the burst 

pressure of the flexible hose, used to vent 

oxygen from the high-pressure relief valve of 

the oxygen cylinder overboard, is lower than 

the opening pressure of the high-pressure 

relief valve. This could cause the flexible 

hose to burst before it is able to vent the 

excess oxygen overboard. If an ignition 

source is present, the accumulation of oxygen 

in an enclosed space may result in an 

uncontrolled oxygen-fed fire. 

This [Canadian] AD mandates the 

replacement of the oxygen hose assembly 

with a new design oxygen hose assembly. 

You may examine the MCAI in the 

AD docket on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov/

#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2015-0822- 

0004. 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

participate in developing this AD. The 

following presents the comments 

received on the NPRM (80 FR 19574, 

April 13, 2015) and the FAA’s response 

to each comment. 

Request To Change the Compliance 

Time 

Mesa Airlines and Envoy Air Inc. 

asked that the compliance time 

specified in paragraph (g) of the 

proposed AD (80 FR 19574, April 13, 

2015) be changed. 

Mesa Airlines stated that the current 

compliance time would immediately 

ground 78 airplanes on the effective 

date of the AD, and with increased 

demand for replacement parts it would 

be difficult to recover. Mesa Airlines 

asked that we change the compliance 

time to ‘‘Within 6,000 flight hours, or 

within 44 months after the effective date 

of this AD, whichever occurs first.’’ 

Mesa Airlines added that this would 

allow for scheduling with heavy 

maintenance inspection and parts 

procurement. 

Envoy Air Inc. stated that a large 

number of affected airplanes have flown 

more than 5,800 total flight hours. 

Envoy Air Inc. noted that the proposed 

compliance time ‘‘before the 

accumulation of 5,800 total flight 

hours’’ would mean that most of the 

affected airplanes would be required to 

comply with this AD prior to the 

effective date to remain in compliance. 

Envoy Air Inc. asked that we change the 

compliance time to ‘‘Within 5,800 flight 

hours or 44 months, whichever occurs 

first, from the effective date of the AD.’’ 

Envoy Air Inc. stated that this would 

more clearly communicate the desired 

compliance time for this AD. 

We partially agree with the requests. 

We have changed the compliance time 

in paragraph (g) of this AD to ‘‘Within 

5,800 flight hours or 44 months after the 

effective date of this AD, whichever 

occurs first.’’ This change matches the 

compliance time listed in the MCAI, 

and will allow operators to remain in 

compliance. 

We do not agree that the compliance 

time should be extended to ‘‘Within 

6,000 flight hours, or within 44 months 

after the effective date of this AD, 

whichever occurs first.’’ After 


Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES