alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017218EN.01001501.xml

| 7.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 218/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 218/15

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8504 — EDF Energy Services/ESSCI)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 218/03)

On 29 June 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8504. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8504. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
STATE v. Kenneth Vernon GOLDER

79PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 7, 2019

Anne Bleyman, Attorney at Law, for Golder, Kenneth Vernon.

Michael T. Henry, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

G. Glenn Gerding, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

John F. Carella, Staff Attorney, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Ivy Johnson, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 7th of August 2019 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of August 2019."
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Novellus Systems, Inc. of our report dated January 17, 2000, included in the
1999 Annual Report to Shareholders of Novellus Systems. Our audits also included
the financial statement schedule of Novellus Systems, Inc. listed in Item 14(a).
This schedule is the responsibility of management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement
schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-48037) and the related Prospectus and Registrations Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-11825, 33-88156, 33-51056, 33-36787, 33-25897, 33-62807,
333-35487, 333-65567, and 333-80453) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1992
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Amended and Restated 1984 Stock Option Plan,
the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the Amended and Restated 1992 Stock Option
Plan, and in the related prospectuses of our report dated January 17, 2000, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Novellus Systems, Inc.
incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1999.


                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Jose, California
March 24, 2000
EXHIBIT 32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dogs International (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Rosemary Williams, President and Principal Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

-  The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 

 

                                                                                               /S/RosemaryWilliams                       

                                                                                               Rosemary Williams

                                                                                               President and Principal Financial Officer

                                                                                               December 22, 2004
EXHIBIT 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Derek A. Bertocci, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of VISX, Incorporated;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/Derek A. Bertocci
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2



                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
for the three months ended September 30, 2004, I, Douglas N. Biddle, Chief
Administrative Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:

      1)    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three
            months ended September 30, 2004, fully complies with the
            requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934; and

      2)    the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
            the Company for the three months ended September 30, 2004, fairly
            presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
            results of operations of Plumas Bancorp.


Date:  November 10, 2004                 /s/ D. N. Biddle
       -----------------              -----------------------------------
                                      Douglas N. Biddle, Chief Administrative
                                                 Officer
#### State of Florida ex rel. W. A. Hicks, as Justice of the Peace of the Third Justice of the Peace District, in and for Broward County, State of Florida, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. H. G. Wheeler, J. D. Butler, John M. Walton, John M. Bryan and Frank C. Dickey, as and Constituting the Board of County Commissioners of Broward County, State of Florida, *Defendants in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed March 15, 1928.

*G. II. Martin*and *George W. Tedder,*for Plaintiff in *Error;*

*W. M. Pope,*for Defendants in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having been submitted to the Court upon a transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ■ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitpield, P. J., and Terrell and Bupord, J. J., concur.
Exhibit 23






                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



Boundless Corporation

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  registration
statements of Boundless  Corporation on Form S-8 (File Nos.  33-95846,  33-81106
and 33-86896) of our report dated  February 28, 1998 (except for Notes 1, 11 and
19 as to which the date is March  26,  1998) on our  audits of the  consolidated
financial statements and schedules of Boundless  Corporation and Subsidiaries as
of December 31, 1997 and for the year ended  December 31, 1997,  which report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





BDO Seidman, LLP



Dallas, Texas
March 27, 1998
No. 09-8638.

#### Page Penk, Petitioner v. Edward Tauer, Mayor of the City of Aurora, Colorado, et al.

559 U.S. 1000, 130 S. Ct. 1898,

176 L. Ed. 2d 357,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2359.

March 22, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Colorado dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
STATE of North Carolina v. Ricky Franklin CHARLES, Defendant.

No. COA18-945

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 16, 2019

DISMISSED.
EXHIBIT
      32.2




Written
      Statement of Principal Executive Officer Furnished Pursuant to


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


as
      Adopted by


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of HouseRaising, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert V. McLemore,
      President and Founder, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
      that:




(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition as of June 30, 2006 and results of operations for the
      quarter ended June 30, 2006 of the Company and its subsidiaries.






/s/
      Robert V. McLemore


------------------------


Robert
      V.
      McLemore


President
      and Founder (Principal Executive Officer)





August
      14, 2006





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5127 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5127

    To prohibit the Department of Energy from obligating funds for 
 appropriation earmarks in the Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 
                                program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2006

 Mr. Beauprez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the Department of Energy from obligating funds for 
 appropriation earmarks in the Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 
                                program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON OBLIGATION OF FUNDS FOR CERTAIN 
              APPROPRIATIONS EARMARKS.

    The Department of Energy may not obligate any funds made available 
in an appropriation Act to implement an earmark for any entity other 
than a Department of Energy laboratory with respect to the Energy 
Efficiency and Renewable Energy program.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall apply to appropriations Acts for fiscal year 2007 or 
any subsequent fiscal year.
                                 <all>
```
CHAVEZ, et al. v. CARMICHAEL

437PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 6, 2019

Sean F. Perrin, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Carmichael, Irwin (Sheriff).

Sejal Zota, Attorney at Law, W. Rob Heroy, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Chavez, Carlos, et al.

Erez Reuveni, Attorney at Law, Joshua S. Press, Attorney at Law, Gill P. Beck, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for United States.

Deborah Weissman, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Law Scholars and National Immigrant Justice Center.

Raul A. Pinto, Attorney at Law, for North Carolina Justice Center.

Irena Como, Attorney at Law, for ACLU, et al.

R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for The State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of June 2019 by ACLU of NC to admit Spencer Amdur Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of June 2019."
Clair Craver JOHNSON, Respondent, v. John ROBERTS, M.D., Petitioner. and Clair Craver Johnson, Respondent, v. Medical University of South Carolina, Petitioner.

Appellate Case No. 2018-000914 Opinion No. 27897

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Submitted June 17, 2019 Filed June 19, 2019 Rehearing Denied August 14, 2019

Donald J. Davis, Jr., Stephen L. Brown, James E. Scott, IV, and Russell G. Hines, all of Young Clement Rivers, LLP, Joseph C. Wilson, IV and William P. Early, both of Pierce, Sloan, Wilson, Kennedy & Early, L.L.C., all of Charleston, for Petitioner.

Jonathan B. Asbill, of Baker Ravenel & Bender, LLP of Columbia, for Respondent.

JUSTICE HEARN :

**258*911Petitioners Dr. John Roberts and the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) sought a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in *Johnson v. Roberts* , 422 S.C. 406, 812 S.E.2d 207 (Ct. App. 2018).1 Respondent Clair Johnson filed a medical malpractice action alleging Roberts and MUSC negligently treated Johnson with electroconvulsive therapy. Roberts and MUSC moved for summary judgment, contending the six-year statute of repose2 barred her claims, and the circuit court agreed, holding the repose period began on the first date of treatment. On appeal, the court of appeals **259reversed, relying on its decision in *Marshall v. Dodds*3 to hold that there was evidence to support Johnson's claim that Roberts and MUSC acted negligently within six years of filing her lawsuit. This Court recently affirmed as modified the court of appeals' *Marshall* decision, holding the statute of repose begins to run after each occurrence.

Roberts and MUSC now contend that the court of appeals erred in finding Johnson's claims preserved for review and in holding the statute of repose began after each occurrence. We disagree and affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: (1) As to issue preservation, see *Atl. Coast Builders & Contractors, LLC v. Lewis* , 398 S.C. 323, 330, 730 S.E.2d 282, 285 (2012) ("While it may be good practice for us to reach the merits of an issue when error preservation is doubtful, we should follow our longstanding precedent and resolve the issue on preservation grounds when it *clearly* is unpreserved.") (emphasis added), and (2) As to the merits, we find the allegations of medical malpractice indistinguishable from those in *Marshall* .

**AFFIRMED.**

BEATTY, C.J. and FEW, J., concur. JAMES, J., dissenting in a separate opinion in which KITTREDGE, J., concurs.

JUSTICE JAMES :

I dissent based on my dissenting opinion in *Marshall* .

KITTREDGE, J., concurs.

1

For a full recitation of the facts, see the court of appeals' opinion.

2

S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-545(A) (2005).

3

417 S.C. 196, 789 S.E.2d 88 (Ct. App. 2016), *aff'd as modified* , Op. No. 27873 (S.C. Sup. Ct. filed March 27, 2019) (Shearouse Ad. Sh. No. 13 at 37 ), *reh'g denied* (May 30, 2019).
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10619-10620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5184]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,152]


CCL Container, Hermitage, PA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 6, 2009, in response to a 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of CCL 
Container, Hermitage, Pennsylvania.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.


[[Page 10620]]


    Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of February 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-5184 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 
 
 **Certification
        of Chief Executive Officer of ULURU Inc.**
 **Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant**
 **to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of ULURU Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
        10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the
        “Report”), the undersigned officer of ULURU Inc. does hereby certify, pursuant
        to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
        (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:
 
 (1.)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2.)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
        Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
        upon request.
 
 
 Date:
                  July 13, 2006
              
              /s/
                  Kerry P. GrayKerry
                  P. GrayPresident
                  and Chief Executive Officer