1

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: E. Pierce Marshall, Individually, as will proponent, as co-trustee 

of the Marshall Grandchildren’s Trust for the Benefit of E. Pierce 

Marshall, Jr., as co-trustee of the Marshall Grandchildren’s Trust 

for the Benefit of Preston Marshall, as trustee of the Marshall 

Petroleum, Inc. Stockholding Trust, as trustee of the Marshall 

Museum and Library Trust, as trustee of the Bettye B. Marshall 

Living Trust, as trustee of the J. Howard Marshall, II, Marital 

Trust Number Two, and as trustee of the E. Pierce Marshall 

Family Trust created under the Bettye B. Marshall Living Trust 

Indenture dated October 30, 1990; Elaine Marshall, Individually, 

as co-trustee of the Marshall Grandchildren’s Trust for the 

benefit of E. Pierce Marshall, Jr., and as co-trustee of the 

Marshall Grandchildren’s Trust for the Benefit of Preston

Marshall; E. Pierce Marshall, Jr.; Preston Marshall; Marshall 

Petroleum, Inc.; Trof, Inc.; Finley Hilliard, individually, as 

trustee of the J. Howard Marshall, II, Living Trust, as trustee of 

the Marshall Petroleum, Inc. Stock Holding Trust, as trustee of 

the Grantor Retained Annuity Trust, as trustee of the J. Howard 

Marshall Charitable Lead Trust, as trustee of the J. Howard 

Marshall, II, Liquidating Trust Number Two, and as trustee of 

the J. Howard Marshall, II, Family Trust; Ken Farrar, as trustee 

of the J. Howard Marshall, II, Living Trust, as trustee of the J. 

Howard Marshall, II, Liquidating Trust Number One, and as 

trustee of the J. Howard Marshall, II, Family Trust; and Dr. 

Stephen Cook, as trustee of the Marshall Museum and Library 

Trust v. J. Howard Marshall, III; Vickie Lynn Marshall; Harvey 

Sorensen; and Foulston & Siefkin, L.L.P.

****
2

Foulston & Siefkin, L.L.P. and Harvey Sorensen v. J. Howard 

Marshall, III

 

J. Howard Marshall, III v. E. Pierce Marshall, Individually, as 

will proponent, as co-trustee of the Marshall Grandchildren’s 

Trust for the Benefit of E. Pierce Marshall, Jr., as co-trustee of 

the Marshall Grandchildren’s Trust for the Benefit of Preston 

Marshall, as trustee of the Marshall Petroleum, Inc. Stockholding 

Trust, as trustee of the Marshall Museum and Library Trust, as 

trustee of the Bettye B. Marshall Living Trust, as trustee of the J. 

Howard Marshall, II, Marital Trust Number Two, and as trustee 

of the E. Pierce Marshall Family Trust created under the Bettye 

B. Marshall Living Trust Indenture dated October 30, 1990; 

Elaine Marshall, Individually, as co-trustee of the Marshall 

Grandchildren’s Trust for the benefit of E. Pierce Marshall, Jr., 

and as co-trustee of the Marshall Grandchildren’s Trust for the 

Benefit of Preston Marshall; E. Pierce Marshall, Jr.; Preston 

Marshall; Marshall Petroleum, Inc.; Trof, Inc.; Finley Hilliard, 

individually, as trustee of the J. Howard Marshall, II, Living 

Trust, as trustee of the Marshall Petroleum, Inc. Stock Holding 

Trust, as trustee of the Grantor Retained Annuity Trust, as trustee 

of the J. Howard Marshall Charitable Lead Trust, as trustee of the 

J. Howard Marshall, II, Liquidating Trust Number Two, and as 

trustee of the J. Howard Marshall, II, Family Trust; Ken Farrar, 

as trustee of the J. Howard Marshall, II, Living Trust, as trustee 

of the J. Howard Marshall, II, Liquidating Trust Number One, 

and as trustee of the J. Howard Marshall, II, Family Trust; 

Harvey Sorensen; Foulston & Siefkin, L.L.P.; Dr. Stephen Cook, 

as trustee of the Marshall Museum and Library Trust; Charles 

Koch; Don Cordes; and Koch Industries, Inc.

** **

Vickie Lynn Marshall v. E. Pierce Marshall, as will proponent, 

Individually, as co-trustee of the Marshall Grandchildren’s Trust 

for the Benefit of E. Pierce Marshall, Jr., as co-trustee of the 

Marshall Grandchildren’s Trust for the Benefit of Preston 

Marshall, as trustee of the Marshall Petroleum, Inc. Stockholding 

Trust, as trustee of the Marshall Museum and Library Trust, as 

trustee of the Bettye B. Marshall Living Trust, as trustee of the J. 
3

Howard Marshall, II, Marital Trust Number Two, and as trustee 

of the E. Pierce Marshall Family Trust created under the Bettye 

B. Marshall Living Trust Indenture dated October 30, 1990; 

Elaine Marshall, Individually, as co-trustee of the Marshall 

Grandchildren’s Trust for the benefit of E. Pierce Marshall, Jr., 

and as co-trustee of the Marshall Grandchildren’s Trust for the 

Benefit of Preston Marshall; E. Pierce Marshall, Jr.; Preston 

Marshall; Marshall Petroleum, Inc.; Trof, Inc.; Finley Hilliard, 

individually, as trustee of the J. Howard Marshall, II, Living 

Trust, as trustee of the Marshall Petroleum, Inc. Stock Holding 

Trust, as trustee of the Grantor Retained Annuity Trust, as trustee 

of the J. Howard Marshall Charitable Lead Trust, as trustee of the 

J. Howard Marshall, II, Liquidating Trust Number Two, and as 

trustee of the J. Howard Marshall, II, Family Trust; Ken Farrar, 

as trustee of the J. Howard Marshall, II, Living Trust, as trustee 

of the J. Howard Marshall, II, Liquidating Trust Number One, 

and as trustee of the J. Howard Marshall, II, Family Trust; 

Harvey Sorensen; Foulston & Siefkin, L.L.P.; and Dr. Stephen 

Cook, as trustee of the Marshall Museum and Library Trust

Appellate case number: 01-02-00114-CV

Trial court number: 276,815-402

Trial court: Probate Court No. 2 of Harris County

On August 15, 2002, we abated this appeal pursuant to a notice of bankruptcy 

stating that J. Howard Marshall, III had filed for bankruptcy protection. See 11 U.S.C.S.

§ 362(a)(1) (LexisNexis 2009); TEX. R. APP. P. 8.1, 8.2. On January 31, 2014, J. Howard 

Marshall, III filed a “Motion to Lift Bankruptcy Stay and Motion for Scheduling 

Conference,” stating that the bankruptcy court had closed the bankruptcy case and 

requesting that we “issue an order lifting the stay in this case.” J. Howard Marshall, III 

attached an order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of 

California, dated January 6, 2014, to his motion, reflecting that J. Howard Marshall, III’s 

bankruptcy case “is hereby closed.”1 Accordingly, to the extent that J. Howard Marshall, 

 

1 The motion does not include a certified copy of the federal court’s order as 

required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 8.3(a). Nevertheless, we take 

judicial notice of the United States Bankruptcy Court’s order closing the 

bankruptcy case, which is capable of accurate and ready determination through the 

federal court’s PACER service. See TEX. R. EVID. 201; Office of Pub. Util. 

Counsel v. Pub. Util. Com’n of Tex., 878 S.W.2d 598, 600 (Tex. 1994).
4

III moves for an order lifting the bankruptcy stay in this case, we grant the motion and 

reinstate this case on the Court’s active docket. See 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(2)(A).

In the same motion, J. Howard Marshall, III further moves the Court to “set a date 

for a scheduling and status conference, at which the Court will determine the future 

deadlines in the case.” In support of this request, J. Howard Marshall, III argues that the 

bankruptcy proceedings discharged parts of the judgment on appeal, that “it is unclear . . . 

whether [Vickie Lynn Marshall’s] estate will continue to pursue her will contest,” that 

Vickie Lynn Marshall and E. Pierce Marshall have passed away and “several of the other 

entities will necessarily have new trustees or representatives,” thereby necessitating “time 

to ensure that all parties to the judgment have been apprised that the appeal is going 

forward,” that counsel of record may have changed, that there is a dispute regarding who 

bears the burden of paying for the reporter’s record, that “it is unclear to [J. Howard 

Marshall, III’s] counsel whether the clerk’s record is presently complete,” and that a 

scheduling conference would be an appropriate place to discuss whether mediation is 

appropriate for this case. 

To the extent the bankruptcy court proceedings discharged portions of the trial 

court’s judgment in this case, we will review the trial court’s judgment in light of the 

bankruptcy court’s judgment. Further, if the executor of Vickie Lynn Marshall’s estate 

determines that it would be in the estate’s best interest to discontinue pursuit of her 

appeal, the executor may notify this Court and the respective parties. Moreover, if her 

estate elects to pursue her appeal, it will be required to abide by the briefing schedule 

ordered by this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a), (d), 38.8(a), 42.3(c).

To the extent the parties or attorneys on appeal have changed, it is the parties’ and 

counsels’ responsibility to notify the Court of any such changes. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.1, 

6.2, 6.5, 7.1(a)(1), (b). Further, we order the parties to file motions for substitution of 

the parties as necessary and appropriate, which shall include motions to substitute the 

current trustees in lieu of E. Pierce Marshall for each entity on whose behalf E. Pierce 

Marshall filed a notice of appeal.2 See TEX. R. APP. P. 7.1(b).

The record in this appeal was originally due on April 8, 2002. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

35.1(a). The clerk’s record, consisting of 41 volumes, was filed on June 17, 2002. If any 

counsel believes that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk’s record, counsel 

may direct the trial court clerk to prepare, certify, and file a supplemental clerk’s record 

containing any such item or items, and the supplemental clerk’s record will be made part 

 

2 These entities include: the Marshall Grandchildren’s Trust for the Benefit of E. 

Pierce Marshall, Jr., the Marshall Grandchildren’s Trust for the Benefit of Preston 

Marshall, the Marshall Petroleum, Inc. Stockholding Trust, the Marshall Museum 

and Library Trust, the Bettye B. Marshall Living Trust, the J. Howard Marshall, II, 

Marital Trust Number Two, and the E. Pierce Marshall Family Trust created under 

the Bettye B. Marshall Living Trust Indenture dated October 30, 1990.
5

of the record in this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(b)(4), (c)(1), (3). Because the 

clerk’s record was originally filed more than 11 years ago, however, the filing of any 

supplemental clerk’s record will not be grounds for an extension of time to file any 

party’s brief in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(b)(1) (“At any time before the clerk’s 

record is prepared, any party may file” designation of items to be included in record); 

38.6(a) (setting deadline for filing appellant’s brief based on filing of clerk’s record). 

Further, on March 18, 2002, the court reporter informed the Court that, although 

several parties had expressed interest in the record and requested estimates, no party had 

actually requested or paid for the reporter’s record. The reporter also informed the Court 

that the record would contain “approximately 30,000 pages of trial testimony, bench and 

chambers conferences, and hearings, and thousands of pages of exhibits.” All appellants

are jointly and severally liable for the costs to prepare the reporter’s record. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 34.6(b)(1), (c)(1), (3), 35.3(b)(2), (3), 37.3(c)(2). The Court therefore orders the 

appellants to provide written evidence from the court reporter showing that one or more 

appellant has paid or made arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee for preparing the 

reporter’s record within 30 days of the date of this Order, or the Court will consider and 

decide this appeal on those points or issues that do not require a reporter’s record for a 

decision.3 See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c) (“The trial and 

appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely 

filed. ... The appellate court may enter any order necessary to ensure the timely filing of 

the appellate record.”).

The brief of appellants E. Pierce Marshall, Individually, as will proponent, as cotrustee of the Marshall Grandchildren’s Trust for the Benefit of E. Pierce Marshall, Jr., as 

co-trustee of the Marshall Grandchildren’s Trust for the Benefit of Preston Marshall, as 

trustee of the Marshall Petroleum, Inc. Stockholding Trust, as trustee of the Marshall 

Museum and Library Trust, as trustee of the Bettye B. Marshall Living Trust, as trustee 

of the J. Howard Marshall, II, Marital Trust Number Two, and as trustee of the E. Pierce 

Marshall Family Trust created under the Bettye B. Marshall Living Trust Indenture dated 

October 30, 1990; Elaine Marshall, Individually, as co-trustee of the Marshall 

Grandchildren’s Trust for the benefit of E. Pierce Marshall, Jr., and as co-trustee of the 

Marshall Grandchildren’s Trust for the Benefit of Preston Marshall; E. Pierce Marshall, 

Jr.; Preston Marshall; Marshall Petroleum, Inc.; Trof, Inc.; Finley Hilliard, individually, 

as trustee of the J. Howard Marshall, II, Living Trust, as trustee of the Marshall 

Petroleum, Inc. Stock Holding Trust, as trustee of the Grantor Retained Annuity Trust, as 

 

3 Because all of the appellants are jointly and severally liable for payment for the 

reporter’s record, we will not grant any extensions of time for providing evidence 

of the payment of the court reporter’s fee for preparing the record, nor will we 

consider motions for allocation of costs of the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. 

P. 34.6(b)(1), (c)(1), (3), 35.3(b)(2), (3), 37.3(c)(2).
6

trustee of the J. Howard Marshall Charitable Lead Trust, as trustee of the J. Howard 

Marshall, II, Liquidating Trust Number Two, and as trustee of the J. Howard Marshall, II,

Family Trust; Ken Farrar, as trustee of the J. Howard Marshall, II, Living Trust, as trustee 

of the J. Howard Marshall, II, Liquidating Trust Number One, and as trustee of the J. 

Howard Marshall, II, Family Trust; and Dr. Stephen Cook, as trustee of the Marshall 

Museum and Library Trust shall be filed within 30 days after the complete record is filed. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). 

The appellant’s brief of Foulston & Siefkin, L.L.P. and Harvey Sorensen will be 

due within 30 days of the filing of the appellants’ brief by E. Pierce Marshall et al. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). 

J. Howard Marshall, III’s appellant’s and response briefs

4

and Vickie Lynn 

Marshall’s appellant’s and response briefs

5 will be due within 30 days after the later of 

the date that E. Pierce Marshall et al.’s appellants’ brief is filed or the date that Foulston 

& Siefkin, L.L.P. and Harvey Sorensen’s appellants’ brief is filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

38.6(b). 

The appellees’ brief of E. Pierce Marshall et al., the appellees’ brief of Foulston & 

Siefkin, L.L.P. and Harvey Sorensen, and the appellees’ brief of Charles Koch, Don 

Cordes, and Koch Industries, Inc., if any, will be due within 30 days after the later of the 

date that J. Howard Marshall, III’s appellant’s brief is filed or the date that Vickie Lynn 

Marshall’s appellant’s brief is filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b). 

Finally, if the Court, on its own motion or on motion of any party, determines that 

this case is appropriate for referral to mediation, the Court will inform the parties of such 

determination. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 154.021, 154.022(a), 

154.023 (West 2011).

Accordingly, we deny J. Howard Marshall, III’s request to set a date for a 

scheduling conference.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: March 13, 2014

 

4 We order J. Howard Marshall, III to file two separate briefs, one appellant’s brief 

and one response brief, rather than a combined brief.

5 We order Vickie Lynn Marshall to file two separate briefs, one appellant’s brief 

and one response brief, rather than a combined brief.