+(,121/,1(

Citation: 45 Fed. Reg. 7544 1980 

Content downloaded/printed from 

HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org)

Tue Nov 12 18:43:16 2013

-- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance

 of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license

 agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License

-- The search text of this PDF is generated from 

 uncorrected OCR text.
7544 Federal Register / Vol. 45, No. 24 / Monday, February 4, 1980 / Rules and Regulations II

'Dated: January 22, 1980.

C. R. Thompson,

Captain, US. Coast Guard, Captain of the

Port, Hampton Roads.

(FR'Doc. 80-3M3 Filed 2-1-0; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-14-M

33 CFR Part 183

[CGD 76-082]

Ventilation Safety Standards for

Recreational Boats

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Correction of final rule.

SUMMARY: In FR Doc. 79-38640

appearing at page 73025 in the FederalRegister of December 17,-1979,

paragraph 183.630(a) is corrected by

deleting "a" after the word "having",

and paragraph 183.630(a)(1) is corrected

by adding "A" to precede the word "supply".

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:.

Mr. Lars E. Granholm, Office of Boating

Safety (G-BBT), U.S. Coast Guard,

Department of Transportation,

Washin, ton, D.C. 20593 (202/426-4027).

Dated: January 30, 1980.

B. E. Thompson,

RearAdmiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Chief, Office

of Boating Safety.

[FR Doec. 80-3641 Filed 2-1-80;. 45 am]

BILWNG Code 4910-14-M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81

[FRL 1384-3]

Nevada Plan Revision: Air Quality

Control Region Redesignation

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rulemaking.

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection

Agency takes final action to approve the

redesignation of the Nevada portion

(Clark County) of the Clark-Mohave

Interstate Air Quality Control Region

(AQCR) as an intrastate AQCR. On

March 23, 1979, under section 107(e) of

the Clean Air Act, as amended, the

redesignation was submitted for EPA

approval by the Governor of Nevada.

The intended effect of this redesignation

is to improve management of the air

resources in southern Nevada and to be

consistent with and in support of a

redesignation action by the Governor of

Arizona.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 4, 1980.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Louise P. Giersch, Director, Air and

Hazardous Materials*Division,

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region IX, 215 Fremont Street, San

Francisco, Calif. 94105, Attn: Douglas

Grano; (415) 556-2938.

bUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Under section 107 of the Clean Air

Act, as amended, the Clark-Mohave

Interstate AQCR was designated by the

Administrator. This AQCR is described

in 40 CFR 81.80 as including all of Clark

County, Nevada, and Mohave and Yuma

Counties, Arizona.

The Governor of Arizona, in a letter

dated January 26, 1979, requested that

the AQCR's in Arizona be redesignated

to conform to the boundaries of the

Arizona Planning Districts. This request

included the redesignation of the ClarkMohave Interstate AQCR to an

intrastate AQCR consisting of Mohave

and Yuma Counties. With the exception

of the Clark-Mohave Interstate AQCR,

the EPA will address the Arizona

redesignations in a separate Federal

Register notice.

Clark County Redesignation

In a letter dated March 23, 1979, the

Governor of Nevada requested the

EPA's approval of his redesignation of

'the Nevada portion (Clark County) of

the Clark-Mohave Interstate AQCR as

an intrastate AQCR.

.As stated by Governor List, the

redesignation will furtherimprove

management of the air resources in

southern Nevada. The Governor also

states that the provisions of section 126

of the Clean Air Act are adequate to

protect the citizens of each state from

air pollution from new sources located

in the other state. Thus the

redesignation of Clark County as an

intrastate AQCR is expected to have no

adverse ffect upon interstate air

pollution within the present ClarkMohave Interstate AQCR.

Effects of Redesignation

As a result of this redesignaton,

minor revisions are being made to the

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), In 40

CFR part 81, the name and description

of the AQCR in § 81.80 are being

revised, and a new AQCR is being

added. In 40 CFR § 52.121 and § 52.1471

(Classification of regions), and in 40 CFR

§ 52.130 (Source surveillance) the name

of the AQCR is being changed.

The EPA is approving this

redesignation because it meets the

requirements of section 107(e) of the

Clean Air Act, as amended, which

requires, in effect, that the redesignation

be for purposes of improved air quality

management. In addition, the Governor

of Arizona has consented to the

proposed redesignation, as required by

section 107(e).

On June 22,1979 (44 FR 30434) the

EPA published a Notice of Proposed

Rulemaking, proposing to redesignate

Clark County as an intrastate AQCR

and inviting public comments on that

proposal. No comments were received.

The EPA has determined that this

document is not a significant regulation

and does not require preparation of a

regulatory analysis under Executive.

Order 12044.

(Sections 107,110 and 301(a) of the Clat Air

Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7407, 7410, and

7601(a)))

Dated: January 29, 1980.

Douglas M. Costle,

Administrator.

Chapter 1, Title 40 of the Code of

Federal Regulations is amended as

follows:

PART 52-APPROVAL AND

PROMULGATION OF

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

Subpart D-Arizona

1. Section 52.121 is revised to read as

follows:

§ 52.121 Classification of regions.

The Arizona plan is evaluated on the

basis of the following classifications:

Pollutant

Air qualiy control region Particulate Sulfur Nitrogen Carbon Ozone

matter oxides dioxide monoxide

Arizona-New Mexico Southern Border Interstate. IA IA Itl III III

Mohave-Yuma Intrastate . I IA III I I Four Comers Interstate .... ... IA IA Ill III III

Phoenix-Tucson Intrastate .. ... I I III I I
Federal Register / Vol. 45, No. 24 / Monday, February 4, 1980 / Rules and Regulations

" 2. Paragraphs (a) and (c)(1) of § 52.130

are revised to read as follows:

§ 52.130 Source VurveiIlance.

(a) The requirements of § 51.19(a) of

this chapter are not met since the plan

does not contain legally enforceable

procedures for requiring sources in Gila,

Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties in the

Phoenix-Tucson Intrastate Region, in the

Mohave-Yuma Intrastate Region, and in

the Arizona portions of the ArizonaNew Mexico SouthernBorder and Four

Comers Interstate Regions to maintain

records of and periodically report on the

nature and amounts of emissions.

c) Regulation for source

recordkeeping andreporting. (1) The

owner or operator of any stationary

source in the counties of Gila, Pinal, or

Santa Cruz in the Phoenix-Tucson

Intrastate Region [§ 81.36 of this

chapter); the Mohave-Yuma Intrastate

Region [§ 81.268 of this chapter); or-the

Arizona portions of the Four Comers or

Arizona-New Mexico Southern Border

Interstate Regions [§ § 81.121 and 81.99

of this chapter) shall, upon notification

from the Administrator, maintain

records of the nature and amounts of

emissions from such source or any other

information as may be deemed

necessary by the Administrator to

determine whether such source is in

compliance with applicable emission

limitations or other control measures.

Subpart OD-Nevada

3. Section 52.1470, paragraph (c)(15) is

added as follows:

§ 52.1470 Identification of plan.

(c)~

(15) Redesignation of the ClarkMohave Interstate AQCR submitted on

March 23,1979, by the Governor.

4. Section 52.1471 is revised to read as

follows:

§ 52.1471 Classification of regions.

The Nevada plan is evaluated on the

basis of the following classifications:

PART 81-DESIGNATION OF AREAS

FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING

PURPOSES

Subpart B-Designaton of Air Quality

Control Regions

5. Section 81.80 is revised to read as

follows:

§ 81.80 Las Vegas Intrastate Air Quality

Control Region.

The Las Vegas Intrastate Air Quality

Control Region (Nevada) has been

revised to consist of the territorial area

encompassed by the boundaries of the

following jurisdiction or described area

(including the territorial area of all

municipalities (as defined in section

302(f) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.

7602(f)) geographically located within

the outermost boundaries of the area so

delimited):

In the State of Nevada: Clark County.

* 6. Section 81.268 is added as follows:

§ 81.268 Mohave-Yuma Intrastate Air

Quality Control Region.

The Mohave-Yuma Intrastate Air

Quality Control Region (Arizona) has

been revised to consist of the territorial

area encompassed by the boundaries of

the following jurisdictions or described

area (including the territorial area of all

municipalities (as defined in section

302(f) of the Clean Air Act 42 U.S.C.

7602 (f) geographically located within

the outermost boundaries of the area so

delimited):

In the State of Arizona: Mohave

County and Yuma County.

IFR Doc. W-0619 Filed Z-1-ft 1iS am]

BILLING COOE 656"1-M

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,

EDUCATION, AND WELFARE

Office of the Secretary

41 CFR Part 3-3

Noncompetitive Procurement

AGENCY- Department of Health,

Education. and Welfare.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary,

Department of Health, Education, and

Ai quady co:trol region

Partijate Su!fu t-rogen CArbon Ozone

matter oxides doale monoxide

LasVegas tntstat I IA I1 I I

Norditiest Nevada IntrastateI M III ll

Nevada Intrastate IA IA IN 13 W

Welfare is amending the departmental

procurement regulations. 41 CFR

Chapter 3, to add a new subpart

concerning noncompetitive procurement.

Coverage of noncompetitive

procurement is presently located at § 3-

3.802-50. and this section is being

cancelled as a result of the

establishment of the new Subpart 3-3.53,

Noncompetitive Procurement. The

regulation is being established as a

subpart to emphasize the importance of

the subject matter and to facilitate

reference.

. Changes to the existing regulation are

being made in three areas. The first

change concerns criteria, § 3-3.5303,

where revisions have been made to

clarify the term "sources sought

synopsis" and to explain its use. The

second change concerns review and

approval. J 3-3.5306, where revisions

have been made to accommodate a

recent Federal Procurement Regulations

amendment to § 1-3.101(d) which

requires that noncompetitive

procurements over $10,000 be reviewed

and approved by an official above the

contracting officer level prior to

negotiations. The third change concerns

whole project buys, § 3-3.5308, where a

definition and explanation of its use

have been added to clarify the concept.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 4,1980.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:.

I. S. Lanham, Office of Procurement

Policy, Office of Grants and

Procurement OASMB-OS, Department

of Health. Education, and Welfare,

Washington. D.C. 20201,202-24504,1.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Since the

noncompetitive Procurement regulation

was being restructured into the subpart

format, some portions have been edited

and rewritten for clarity and simplicity.

However, the meaning and intent have

not been altered from what is presently

stated in § 3-3.802-50, except as

indicated in the Summary.

It is the general policy of the

Department to allow time forinterested

parties to participate in the rule making

process. However, since the

amendments are administrative in

nature, the public rule making process is

deemed unnecessary in this instance.

The provisions of this amendment are

issued under 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C.

486(c).

Therefore. 41 CFR Chapter 3 is

amended as set forth below.

iN

7545