alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1924

DAVID J. WASHINGTON, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. DARYL L. BURNS, Marion County Magistrate; DIANE SCOTT; JUDGE BRISTOW; SHERIFF MARK RICHARDSON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:08-cv-00316-RBH)

Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 25, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David J. Washington, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: David J. Washington appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Washington that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Washington failed to file specific objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Washington has waived appellate review by failing to timely file specific objections after receiving proper notice. See United States v. Midgette , 478 F.3d 616, 622 (4th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We deny Washington’s motion for recusal, finding it meritless.

23 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending September 30,2009 of A123 Systems, Inc. (the “Company”), as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Rubino,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, tomy knowledge, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 10,  2009 |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   |
| /s/  Michael Rubino       |   |
| Michael Rubino                 |   |
| Chief Financial Officer        |   |

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON EMERGENCY MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF

Appellate case name: Winnie Stacey Alwazzan v. Isa Ali Alwazzan and 

International Agencies Co., LTD.

Appellate case number: 01-16-00589-CV

Trial court case number: 13FD0848

Trial court: 306th District Court of Galveston County

Appellant, Winnie Stacey Alwazzan (“Winnie”), filed a notice of appeal from the 

trial court’s “Order Vacating May 6, 2016 Order For Judgment in Rem,” signed on July 

21, 2016. On July 27, 2016, Winnie also filed this emergency motion for temporary 

relief requesting, among other things, that this Court stay all the underlying trial court 

proceedings, including the trial court’s July 21, 2016 order, pending this Court’s 

resolution of its appeal from that order.

On July 28, 2016, appellee, International Agencies Co., LTD. (“IACL”), filed a 

response in opposition to Winnie’s motion. IACL contends that Winnie’s motion should 

be denied because, among other things, she had failed to state why emergency relief was 

warranted, how the harm would be irreparable without a stay, and she did not cite any 

case law to support her motion. Also on July 28, 2016, the other appellee, Isa Ali 

Alwazzan, filed a notice of intent to file a response, also requesting denial of the motion.

Accordingly, after reviewing the motion and the responses, the Court denies

Winnie’s emergency motion. See, e.g., Lamar Builders, Inc. v. Guardian Sav. & Loan 

Ass’n, 786 S.W.2d 789, 791 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1990, no writ.) (providing 

movant for temporary order “must make a clear showing that it is entitled to relief.”).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

  Acting individually 

Date: August 2, 2016
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quinton Cardiology Systems
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael
K. Matysik, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
         section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result
         of operations of the Company.

                                         By: /s/ Michael K. Matysik
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Michael K. Matysik
                                             Chief Financial Officer

         Date: April 27, 2004

                                       31
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I,  Charlie  Lan,  Chairman,  President  and  Principal  Executive  Officer  and
Principal  Financial  Officer  of Amanasu Technologies Corporation certify that:

1.   I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Amanasu
     Technologies  Corporation;

2.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  annual  report does not contain any untrue
     statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make  the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this  quarterly  report;  and

3.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other financial
     information  included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects  the  financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the  registrant  as  of,  and  for, the periods presented in this quarterly
     report.


                                     AMANASU  TECHNOLOGIES  CORPORATION

                                     By:  /s/  Charlie  Lan
                                     Charlie  Lan,  Chairman,  President,
                                     Chief  Financial  Officer  and  Director


Date:  May  12,  2003
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Baine Clark Company ) ASBCA No. 63092

)

Under Contract No. W9124M-20-P-0027 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: William D. Kirkland, Esq.

 Kirkland, Cain & Horn, PLLC

 Frankfort, KY

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Scott N. Flesch, Esq.

 Army Chief Trial Attorney

MAJ Weston E. Borkenhagen, JA

CPT Timothy M. McLister, JA

 Trial Attorneys

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: May 2, 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63092, Appeal of Baine Clark Company, 

rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: May 2, 2022

BRIAN S. SMITH

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
EXHIBIT
      32




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
      the
      registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the registrant's
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the "Form
      10-QSB") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form
      10-QSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the registrant.





Date:
      August 21, 2007





Amanasu
      Technologies Corporation





/s/
      Hideyuki Shiraishi





Hideyuki
      Shiraishi


CEO,
      CFO,
      CAO
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Millennium Challenge Corporation

          - [MCC FR 09-08] 

# AGENCY:

Millennium Challenge Corporation. 

# Time and Date:

10 a.m. to 12 p.m., Wednesday, March 11, 2009. 

# Place:

Department of State, 2201 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20520. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Information on the meeting may be obtained from Romell Cummings via e-mail at                         *Board@mcc.gov*                         or by telephone at (202) 521-3600.                     

# Status:

Meeting will be closed to the public. 

# Matters To Be Considered:

                        The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Millennium Challenge Corporation (“MCC”) will hold a meeting to discuss issues related to suspension and/or termination of Compact programs with certain countries eligible for assistance under the Millennium Challenge Act of 2003 (MCA); discuss progress on proposed and existing Compacts with certain MCA-eligible countries; discuss MCC's budget outlook for FY 2009 and 2010; discuss MCC's Threshold Program; and consider certain administrative matters. The agenda items are expected to involve the consideration of classified information and the meeting will be closed to the public. These agenda items have been substituted for the items regarding                               ( print page 10098)                            country selection, and MCC's policy on suspension and termination which appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         notice published Friday, February 27, 2009.                     

Dated: March 4, 2009. 

Henry C. Pitney, 

(Acting) Vice President and General Counsel, Millennium Challenge Corporation.

[FR Doc. E9-4993 Filed 3-5-09; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 9211-03-P
No. 09-8810.

#### David White, Petitioner v. Florida.

559 U.S. 1016, 130 S. Ct. 1905,

176 L. Ed. 2d 381,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2624.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.

Same case below, 17 So. 3d 1234.
No. 09-7878.

#### Sheila Dennis, Petitioner v. Keller Meyer Building Services.

559 U.S. 1059, 130 S. Ct. 2368,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3063.

176 L. Ed. 2d 579,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 944, 130 S. Ct. 1513, 176 L. Ed. 2d 122, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 1320.
Exhibit
10.1





Agreement
on Debt Transfer and Offset







Party A: Xianggang Fuhong
Development Co., Ltd.




Party B: Tianshi International
Holdings Group Co., Ltd.




Party C: Tianshi International
Investment Group Co., Ltd.




Party A,
Party B and Party C enter into this Agreement on June 10, 2010, which shall be
observed by all parties of this Agreement.




Whereas,
Party A is a creditor of Party B and Party B is a creditor of Party
C.  After consultation, Party A, Party B and Party C agree the
provisions as follows:




1.           Party
C pays off the loan payable of USD3,000,000.00 to Party A in place of Party
B;




2.           Party
A writes off the debt of Party B with the same amount;




3.           Party
B writes off the debt of Party C with the same amount;




4.           Party
A, Party B and Party C shall perform this Agreement, including writing proper
receipts on June 11, 2010.




5.           This
Agreement is effective as of the date first written above and is signed by three
parties for confirmation.







Party A: Xianggang Fuhong
Development Co., Ltd.




Legal
Representative: Jinyuan Li




Signature:
/s/ Jinyuan Li







Party B: Tianshi International
Holdings Group Co., Ltd.




Legal
Representative: Jinyuan Li




Signature:
/s/ Jinyuan Li







Party C: Tianshi International
Investment Group Co., Ltd.




Legal
Representative: Jinyuan Li




Signature:
/s/ Jinyuan Li
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 47 (Thursday, March 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5397]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2882]


Petition for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding

March 6, 2009.

    A Petition for Reconsideration has been filed in the Commission's 
Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published 
pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of this document is 
available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, 
SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). 
Oppositions to this petition must be filed by March 27, 2009. See 
Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies 
to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing 
oppositions have expired.
    Subject: In the Matter of Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission's 
Rules to Provide for Flexible Use of the 896-901 MHz and 935-940 MHz 
Band Allotted to the Business and Industrial Land Transportation Pool 
(WT Docket No. 05-62),
    Improving Public Safety Communications in the 800 MHz Band on 
Certain Part 90 (WT Docket No. 02-55), Consolidating the 800 MHz and 
900 MHz Industrial/Land Transportation and Business Pool Channels.
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.

Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-5397 Filed 3-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    I, Harry Chew, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Bi-Optic Ventures, Inc. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended August 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date:  October 11, 2007  /s/  Harry Chew Harry Chew, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer     1
STATE of North Carolina v. Kenneth Vernon GOLDER

No. 79PA18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Anne Bleyman, Attorney at Law, For Golder, Kenneth Vernon.

Michael T. Henry, Assistant Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 13th of March 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
BISHOP v. GOINS et al.

Bishop et al. v. Powell et al.

A17A2058 A17A2059

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

July 30, 2019

William Hundley Turner Jr., Jackson, for Appellant.

Hays Baumhauer McQueen, for Appellee.

Hodges, Judge.

In *Bishop v. Goins* , 344 Ga. App. 174, 809 S.E.2d 280 (2017), we consolidated these cases and affirmed the judgments of the Superior Court of Jasper County awarding costs and attorney fees incurred during the appellate review of certain stalking protective orders. Our Supreme Court reversed our opinion in *Bishop v. Goins* , 305 Ga. 310, 824 S.E.2d 369 (2019), holding that such awards are not available. See OCGA § 16-5-94 (d). Therefore, we vacate our earlier opinion, adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court as our own, and reverse the judgments of the Superior Court of Jasper County.

*Judgments reversed.*

Rickman and Goss, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5038]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-61,780]


Harman/Becker Automotive Systems, Inc., Including On-Site Leased 
Workers From Elwood Staffing, Account Temps and PMI, Currently Known as 
Spartan Staffing, Martinsville, IN; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 
Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on July 20, 2007, applicable to workers of 
Harman/Becker Automotive Systems, Inc., Martinsville, Indiana. The 
notice was published in the Federal Register on August 2, 2007 (72 FR 
42436).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged 
in the production of automotive speakers.
    New information shows that workers leased from Elwood Staffing, 
Account Temps and PMI, currently known as Spartan Staffing were 
employed on-site at the Martinsville, Indiana location of Harman/Becker 
Automotive Systems, Inc. The Department has determined that these 
workers were sufficiently under the control of Harman/Becker Automotive 
Systems, Inc. to be considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Elwood Staffing, Account 
Temps and PMI, currently known as Spartan Staffing, working on-site at 
the Martinsville, Indiana location of the subject firm.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers employed at Harman/Becker Automotive Systems, Inc. who were 
adversely affected by a shift in production of automotive speakers to 
Mexico.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-61,780 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Harman/Becker Automotive Systems, Inc., including 
on-site leased workers from Elwood Staffing, Account Temps and PMI, 
currently known as Spartan Staffing, Martinsville, Indiana, who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
June 28, 2006 through July 20, 2009, are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, 
and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment 
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of February 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-5038 Filed 3-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5074 Engrossed in House (EH)]

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5074

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 to provide for continued 
   payment of railroad retirement annuities by the Department of the 
                   Treasury, and for other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5074

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 to provide for continued 
   payment of railroad retirement annuities by the Department of the 
                   Treasury, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Railroad Retirement Technical 
Improvement Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. DISBURSEMENT AGENT.

    Section 7(b)(4) of the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 (45 U.S.C. 
231f(b)(4)) is amended so that subparagraph (A) reads as follows:
                    ``(A) The Secretary of the Treasury shall serve as 
                the disbursing agent for benefits payable under this 
                Act, under such rules and regulations as the Secretary 
                may in the Secretary's discretion prescribe.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. 09-9402.

#### Terry Earl Neidlinger, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1055, 130 S. Ct. 2359,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2977.

176 L. Ed. 2d 572,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 354 Fed. Appx. 357.