alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



I, Gandolfo Verra, Chief Financial Officer of Cordia Corporation (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.







By: /s/ Gandolfo Verra



-----------------------------------



Gandolfo Verra



Chief Financial Officer



March 29, 2007



* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cordia Corporation and will be retained by Cordia Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Attachment 008 – TS1201UC – Environmental Fate of UltraC

1 of 2 pages 

# SanitizedAttachment 008 – TS1201UC – Environmental Fate ULTRAC

2 of 2 pages 

# sanitized
No. 09-724.

#### The Real Truth About Obama, Inc., Petitioner v. Federal Election Commission, et al.

559 U.S. 1089, 130 S. Ct. 2371,

176 L. Ed. 2d 764,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3521.

April 26, 2010.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of Citizens United v. Federal Election Comm’n, 558 U.S. 310, 130 S. Ct. 876, 175 L. Ed. 2d 753 (2010), and the Solicitor General’s suggestion of mootness.

Same case below, 575 F.3d 342.
Adam T. CHEATHAM, Sr. v. TOWN OF TAYLORTOWN

No. 388P18-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2019

Adam T. Cheatham, Sr., for Cheatham, Adam T. (Sr.).

William C. Morgan, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Town of Taylortown.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff on the 25th of March 2019 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th of March 2019 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."
CHAVEZ, et al. v. CARMICHAEL

437PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 2, 2019

Sean F. Perrin, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Carmichael, Irwin (Sheriff).

Sejal Zota, Attorney at Law, for Chavez, Carlos, et al.

Erez Reuveni, Attorney at Law, for United States.

Joshua S. Press, Attorney at Law, for United States.

W. Rob Heroy, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Chavez, Carlos, et al.

Gill P. Beck, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for United States.

Deborah Weissman, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Law Scholars and National Immigrant Justice Center.

Raul A. Pinto, Attorney at Law, for North Carolina Justice Center.

Irena Como, Attorney at Law, for ACLU, et al.

Cody Wofsy, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for ACLU, et al.

Daniel Galindo, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for ACLU, et al.

Omar Jadwat, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for ACLU, et al.

Spencer Amdur, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for ACLU, et al.

Katrina Braun, Attorney at Law, for ACLU, et al.

R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of July 2019 by *909United States of America to Amend Certificate of Service:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd of August 2019."
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





I, Joel Dupré, Chief Executive Officer of Cordia Corporation (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.







By: /s/ Joel Dupré



-------------------------------



Joel Dupré



Chief Executive Officer



March 31, 2006



* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cordia Corporation and will be retained by Cordia Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C. ss.1350
               UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kevin Brennan, President, certify that:

1. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have reviewed this quarterly
report on Form 10-QSB of XRG, Inc., the registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: February 19, 2004

/s/ Kevin Brennan
-----------------
Kevin Brennan,
President and Chief Executive Officer
STATE v. Gabriel A. FERRARI

277P18-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Gabriel Adrian Ferrari, For Gabriel A. Ferrari

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Todd Williams, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th of January 2019 by Defendant for Strike the Judges Order:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Kurt C. Hall, Co-Chief Executive Officer of Regal Entertainment Group, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Regal Entertainment Group;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



Date:
May 10, 2005

| |  | By: |  | /s/KURT C. HALLKurt C. Hall
Co-Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM RESORT
INCOME INVESTORS, INC.'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>           DEC-31-1996

<CASH>                            146,037 
<SECURITIES>                      327,026 
<RECEIVABLES>                  31,774,425 
<ALLOWANCES>                   27,068,900 
<INVENTORY>                          0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                5,178,588 
<PP&E>                               0    
<DEPRECIATION>                       0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  5,178,588 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             376,998 
<BONDS>                              0    
<COMMON>                        4,801,590 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0    
<PREFERRED>                          0    
<OTHER-SE>                           0    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    5,178,588 
<SALES>                              0    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   70,703 
<CGS>                                0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        0    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                2,124,897 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                6,201,900 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (8,256,094)
<INCOME-TAX>                         0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  0    
<DISCONTINUED>                       0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0    
<CHANGES>                            0    
<NET-INCOME>                   (8,256,094)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (1.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (1.99)

<FN>

NOTE: The above captions are specified in Exhibit 27, and contemplate that
the entity is a going concern.  As discussed in Note 1 to the Company's
financial statements, the Company is in the process of liquidation as of
December 31, 1996.  The amounts above are presented with the caption that,
in management's judgment, most closely correlates to respective financial
statement captions used in the Company's financial statements.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
No. 09-772.

#### Western Radio Services Company, et al., Petitioners v. United States Forest Service, et al.

559 U.S. 1106, 130 S. Ct. 2402,

176 L. Ed. 2d 923,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3705.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 578 F.3d 1116.
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                                                    ------------
EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, William W.R. Elder, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10K of Genus Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: March 12, 2003
/s/ William W. R. Elder
    William W.R. Elder
    Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
No. 09-9586.

#### Christopher L. Jeburk, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1081, 130 S. Ct. 2123,

176 L. Ed. 2d 746,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3262.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5133 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to accept the donation of certain 

sites in Monroe County, Michigan, relating to the Battles of the River 

Raisin during the War of 1812 for inclusion in the National Park 

System. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2006 

Mr. DINGELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to accept the donation 

of certain sites in Monroe County, Michigan, relating 

to the Battles of the River Raisin during the War of 

1812 for inclusion in the National Park System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘River Raisin Battle5 field Acquisition Act’’. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5133 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ACQUISITION OF MONROE COUNTY, MICHIGAN, 

2 SITES RELATING TO BATTLES OF THE RIVER 

3 RAISIN. 

4 (a) DUTY TO ACCEPT DONATION.—If offered by 

5 Monroe County, Michigan, or other willing landowners in 

6 the County, the Secretary of the Interior shall accept on 

7 behalf of the United States the donation of real property 

8 in the County relating to the Battles of the River Raisin 

9 on January 18 and 22, 1813, and their aftermath. 

10 (b) TREATMENT OF ACQUIRED SITES.—The Sec11 retary shall include real property acquired under sub12 section (a) in the National Park System. The real property 

13 may be designated as a new unit of the National Park 

14 System or included in an existing unit of the National 

15 Park System. 

16 (c) REPORT.—Not later than three years after the 

17 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall sub18 mit to the Committee on Resources of the House of Rep19 resentatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 

20 Resources of the Senate a report containing a description 

21 of all real property acquired under subsection (a) and the 

22 disposition of such real property. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
PHG ASHEVILLE, LLC v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE

434PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Catherine A. Hofmann, Assistant City Attorney, for City of Asheville.

Thomas E. Terrell, Jr., Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for PHG Asheville, LLC.

Kip David Nelson, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for PHG Asheville, LLC.

Robin Tatum Currin, City Attorney, for City of Asheville.

Andrew H. Erteschik, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for City of Asheville.

Chad W. Essick, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for City of Asheville.

Colin R. McGrath, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for City of Asheville.

N. Cosmo Zinkow, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for City of Asheville.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of June 2019 by Respondent to Supplement the Record on Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-1804

LT Case Nos. 2020-CA-000005

 2019-CP-000474

_____________________________

ROCCO SANTOMENNO, as Trustee 

and Beneficiary of the John 

Santomenno Revocable Trust, dated

September 26, 1996, as amended, 

and as Trustee and Beneficiary of the 

Edith Santomenno Revocable Trust, 

dated September 26, 1996, as amended,

Appellant,

v.

JOHN SANTOMENNO, JR., ROBERT 

SANTOMENNO, and EDITH

SANTOMENNO,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Flagler County. 

Christopher A. France, Judge. 

Robert A. Drean, of Icard, Merrill, Cullis, Timm, Furen & 

Ginsburg, P.A., Lakewood Ranch, for Appellant. 

Jerry B. Wells, of Jerry B. Wells, P.L., Daytona Beach, for 

Appellee, John Santomenno, Jr. 

David A. Burt, of Hawkins, Hawkins & Burt, LLP, of Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee, Edith Santomenno. 
2

No Appearance for Remaining Appellee,

Robert Santomenno. 

April 2, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, JAY, and KILBANE, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
No. 09-1060.

#### Chandrashekhar B. Thanedar, Petitioner v. Time Warner, Inc., et al.

559 U.S. 1093, 130 S. Ct. 2383,

176 L. Ed. 2d 768,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3644.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 352 Fed. Appx. 891.
No. 09-8816.

#### Jonathan Jimenez, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 987, 130 S. Ct. 1726,

176 L. Ed. 2d 205,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1990.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 329 Fed. Appx. 503.
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40286 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SAUL DIAZ-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-99-CR-353-1

-------------------- December 14, 2000 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Saul Diaz-Lopez appeals his sentence following his guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). Diaz-Lopez argues that his prior felony conviction was an element of the offense of the instant conviction. Diaz-Lopez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for possible Supreme Court review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 120 S. Ct. 2348No. 00-40286 -2- (2000). Diaz-Lopez's argument is foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres , 523 U.S. at 235.
AFFIRMED.
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 12 , 2016

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00470

- CR

MILTON TYRONE DEARBORN , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1430302

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Milton Dearborn appeals his conviction of assault of a family member, second offender

. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.01(a)(1), (b)(2)(A). Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See2

High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 811

– 13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised
of th e right to examine the record and to file a pro se response. See Stafford v.
State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more than 60 days have passed, and no pro se response has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief carefully and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in
the record. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for
review. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices McCally and Brown

. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).