alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
for the three months ended June 30, 2004, I, Douglas N. Biddle, Chief
Administrative Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:

      3)    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three
            months ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of
            section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      4)    the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
            the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2004, fairly
            presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
            results of operations of Plumas Bancorp.

Date: August 11, 2004                              /s/ D. N. Biddle
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Douglas N. Biddle, Chief Administrative
                                                        Officer
# C_2017297EN.01000101.xml

| 8.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8566 — Moog Singapore/SIAEC/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 297/01)

On 16 August 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8566. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8566. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
I, Lance Boxer, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IPC Acquisition Corp.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b)  [omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238];  c)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.     Date:May 13, 2005 /s/ LANCE BOXER       Lance Boxer   Chief Executive Officer
No. 09-10129.

#### John P. Frees, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

560 U.S. 916, 130 S. Ct. 3314,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1204,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3886.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
No. 09-559.

#### John Doe #1, et al., Petitioners v. Sam Reed, Washington Secretary of State, et al.

559 U.S. 1065, 130 S. Ct. 2138,

176 L. Ed. 2d 719,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3385.

April 19, 2010.

Motion of American Business Media, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae out of time granted.
c • .• if n * » I t. 

4diC 

February 24, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 

20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

As a dedicated travel partner of American Airlines, I am writing in support of American's application to provide 

new service from New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport and Los Angeles International Airport to 

Tokyo International Airport at Haneda. 

I recognize and applaud you and the Obama administration for your success last December in reaching a 

landmark Open Skies agreement with Japan, which opens up Haneda to service by U.S. airlines. 

I encourage your selection of American Airlines to provide nonstop service from New York and Los Angeles to 

Haneda in order to provide an essential connection between three of the world's financial and commerce 

centers. 

Recent events, including the successful preservation of Japan Airlines' oneworld Alliance membership, have 

underscored American's strong commitment to the trans-Pacific market. American is likewise committed to 

New York and Los Angles - both vital focal points of business, trade, entertainment, technology and education 

- providing unsurpassed air service since the mid-1900s 

Both the New York and Los Angeles metro areas will gain significant economic benefits from these proposed 

new flights, as will American's customers and employees. However, we need your help to make the 

JFK/Haneda connection a reality. 

Therefore, I strongly urge you to say yes to American Airlines and its request for slots to fly from Kennedy to 

Haneda! 

Sincerely, 

]C^O<.\\\]rO C/)'/IA/T ^ H.I.S. International Tours (NY), Inc.
No. 09-9458.

#### Sally Norton, Petitioner v. Fannie Mae.

560 U.S. 907, 130 S. Ct. 3279,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1189,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3992,

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Bi-Optic Ventures Inc. (the Company) for the Nine Months Ended November 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harry Chew, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  January 8, 2010



/s/ Harry Chew

Harry Chew

Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)





1
No. 09-9632.

#### Anarian Chad Jackson, Petitioner v. Ray Hobbs, Interim Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

559 U.S. 1111, 130 S. Ct. 2415,

176 L. Ed. 2d 932,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3869.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

*933Same case below, 573 F.3d 856.
No. 09-10038.

#### Joseph Alexander, Petitioner v. United States.

560 U.S. 914, 130 S. Ct. 3299,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1201,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4056.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Daniel P. Beharry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Mera Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the Company, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
          procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of
Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
          the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
          and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
          controls; and

6. The Company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: January 31, 2005


s\ Daniel P. Beharry
------------------------------------
Daniel P. Beharry
Chief Executive Officer and Director
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Kenneth Hicks, President and a director of Argentex Mining Corporation (Principal Executive Officer), certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Argentex Mining Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:  June 14, 2006

 

/s/ Kenneth Hicks                              

Kenneth Hicks

President and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amincor, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the  period  ended  March 31,  2013 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on May 15, 2013 (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,  in the
capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.


Date: May 15, 2013                           /s/ John R. Rice, III
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             John R. Rice, III, President
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00515-CV

Daniel Campos and Ivonne C. Munoz

v.

Jaime Garza Elizondo and Maria De Lourdes Montemayor Salinas

On Appeal from the

398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-2275-15-I

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellants, Daniel Campos and Ivonne C. Munoz. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 5, 2019
** **

** **

**Exhibit32.1**

 

**SECTION906 CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of HireRight, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric J. Boden, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

 

•                  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

•                  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| Date:  November 8, 2007 | By:      | /s/  Eric J. Boden  |
|------------------------------|----------|-------------------------------|
|                         |     | Eric J. Boden                 |
| * *                     | * * | *Chief  Executive Officer*    |

 

*Asigned original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

* *

* *

* *

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 14, 2016

No. 04-16-00446-CR

Nicole Diana JOHNSON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 479494

Honorable John D. Fleming, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The appellant’s motion for extension of time to file their brief is granted. The appellant’s 

brief is due on September 27, 2016. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of September, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
               18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED AND PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



    In connection with the quarterly report of American Achievement Corporation
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending May 25, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David G. Fiore,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



    (1) I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American
       Achievement Corporation;



    (2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
       statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
       to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
       such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
       covered by this quarterly report;



    (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
       information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
       material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
       flows of American Achievement Corporation as of, and for, the periods
       presented in this quarterly report.



<Table>
<S>                                                    <C>  <C>
Dated: September 9, 2002                                                /s/ DAVID G. FIORE
                                                            -----------------------------------------
                                                                          David G. Fiore
                                                                     CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
</Table>
QrnALD c. MANN

-.n ..I**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

lib.c, tin'.

Norrid CountyAttorney Silver-ton,

Texas Dear kr. Norrid:

Your letter of January 4, sddreshea to the Attorney General has been referred 'tot&ewriter for January 9, 1939

Opinion No. G-4!? Re: Sheriff's fees in %.QX suits
reply. You request to be dvksea~?nthe following question: Wan the 1 sherif iege&y 6hargemore than $2.00 in any tax sud,t regardless of~thenumber of citations served a@ work perfcrmecWW In repiy ti th&s quesk$on you are respectfully advised &hat the Legislature tis the sole power to provide %r coliqtion **of** delinquent taxes, and to fix the feesallowed each state officer in such SUi$B. Arti?cle9332 of the R. C. 2. of l'exar reads M paPt:

'The Sheriff or Constable of the County kiwhich /thesuit is pending shali receivea e of 'I% ($2.00)Dollars in each case wh'hch will cover the service of all process, and the selling of the property and executingdeeds fW same." In the above Article the Legislature specifically sets out the fee in esch tax case, even though other taxing units are impleaded or intervene,as provided for inArticle 7345b. It remains one and the same case, and the Legislaturemade no provisionunder Article 7345b to allow the sheriff any additional fee. In our opinion the Sheriff of the county in which the suit is pending can notlegally chargemore than $2.00 in any tax suit, regardless of the numberhr. C. W. Norrid, January 9, 1939,Page 2

of citations served andwork performed.
Yours very truly ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS By (Signed)Claud 0. Boothman -=sslstimt COB-KR APPROVXD (Signed)Gerald C. Eann ATTORKZY GEERAL OF TEXAS