alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1080

NATHAN J. POWER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

UNC-LEAR SERVICES, INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-98-2752-18-2)

Submitted: July 14, 2000 Decided: July 27, 2000

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

A. Christopher Potts, HITCHCOCK & POTTS, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Jonathan S. Harbuck, THE KULLMAN FIRM,

Birmingham, Alabama; H. Brewton Hagood, ROSEN, GOODSTEIN & HAGOOD,

P.A., Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Nathan J. Power appeals the district court’s grant of summary

judgment to his former employer in this wrongful termination

action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Power v. Lear Siegler Servs.

Inc., No. CA-98-2752-18-2 (D.S.C. Dec. 14, 1999). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 09-8429.

#### Gerald H. Miller, Petitioner v. Georgia.

560 U.S. 902, 130 S. Ct. 3311,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1180,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3953.

May 17, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

RULE 8051 - OPEN AREAS (Adopted November 15, 2001; Amended August 19, 2004) 1.0 Purpose The purpose of this rule is to limit fugitive dust emissions from open areas. 2.0 Applicability This rule applies to any open area having 0.5 acres or more within urban areas, or 3.0 acres or more within rural areas; and contains at least 1000 square feet of disturbed surface area. The provisions of this rule adopted on November 15, 2001 shall remain in effect until October 1, 2004 at which time the amendments adopted on August 19, 2004 shall take effect.

3.0 Definitions The definitions of terms in Rule 8011 (General Requirements) shall apply to this rule. 4.0 Exemptions The exemptions established in Rule 8011 are also established for this rule. 4.1. Any weed abatement activity utilizing mowing and/or cutting, and which leaves at least three inches of stubble immediately after such mowing/cutting has occurred. 5.0 Requirements Whenever open areas are disturbed or vehicles are used in open areas, an owner/operator shall implement one or a combination of control measures indicated in Table 8051-1 to comply with the conditions of a stabilized surface at all times and to limit VDE to 20% opacity. In addition to the requirements of this rule, a person shall comply with all other applicable requirements of Regulation VIIITABLE 8051-1 SOURCE TYPE AND CONTROL MEASURES FOR OPEN AREAS A. OPEN AREAS: Implement, apply, maintain, and reapply if necessary, at least one or a combination of the following control measures to comply at all times with the conditions for a stabilized surface and limit VDE to 20% opacity as defined in Rule 8011: A1 Apply and maintain water or dust suppressant(s) to all unvegetated areas; or A2 Establish vegetation on all previously disturbed areas; or A3 Pave, apply and maintain gravel, or apply and maintain chemical/organic stabilizers/suppressants. B. VEHICLE USE IN OPEN AREAS: Upon evidence of trespass, prevent unauthorized vehicle access by: Posting “No Trespassing” signs or installing physical barriers such as fences, gates, posts, and/or other appropriate barriers to effectively prevent access to the area. 6.0 Administrative Requirements

6.1 Test Methods The applicable test methods specified in Rule 8011 shall be used to determine compliance with this rule.

6.2 Recordkeeping An owner/operator shall comply with the recordkeeping requirements specified in Rule 8011.
No. 09-9373.

#### Albert F. Lankster, Petitioner v. City of Linden, Alabama.

559 U.S. 1109, 130 S. Ct. 2409,

176 L. Ed. 2d 928,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3778.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1988-A, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 1997 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         71,415
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  12,751
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               84,166
<PP&E>                                         4,165,820
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,769,416)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 480,570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,571
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     477,999
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   480,570
<SALES>                                        135,661
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               137,665
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  56,878
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                46,138
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            46,138
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   46,138
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Optigenex Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony
Bonelli, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Optigenex Inc. and will be retained by Optigenex Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                       /s/ ANTHONY BONELLI
                       -----------------------
                       Anthony Bonelli
                       Chief Executive Officer
                       February 2, 2006
No. 09-9464.

#### Julia L. Musall, Petitioner v. Stella Owens, et al.

559 U.S. 1105, 130 S. Ct. 2428,

176 L. Ed. 2d 922,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3829.

May 3, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until May 24, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET OF WINDSOR PARK PROPERTIES 6 AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE RELATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, PARTNER'S EQUITY AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR THEN
ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         530,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,939,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,270,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,843,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,340,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,402,400<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,843,300
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               883,600
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  276,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               295,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             124,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                187,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            187,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   187,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.63<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>LIMITED AND GENERAL PARTNERS EQUITY.
<F2>NET INCOME PER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT
</FN>


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7913
ANTHONY KOLAWOLE OJO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RAY GEORGE, Unit Manager; MICHAEL JONES, Case Counselor; Q. WOODWARD, JR., Case Counselor, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofSouth Carolina, at Beaufort. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-1611-9-6-JC) Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 2, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Kolawole Ojo, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Parkwood Griffith, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because thereport and recommendation is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument and deny Appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5153 

To revise the number of associate judges of the Superior Court of the 

District of Columbia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2006 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To revise the number of associate judges of the Superior 

Court of the District of Columbia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMPOSITION OF SUPERIOR COURT. 

4 Section 11—903, District of Columbia Official Code, 

5 is amended by striking ‘‘fifty-eight’’ and inserting ‘‘61’’. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
No. 11-618.

#### City of Newkirk, Oklahoma, et al., Petitioners v. Kay Electric Cooperative, et al.

565 U.S. 1158, 132 S. Ct. 1107,

181 L. Ed. 2d 980,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 849.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 647 F.3d 1039.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 12-4

MCN INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF INTEREST COVERAGE RATIO
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

The following table sets forth the interest coverage ratio for MCN Investment on
a historical basis for the periods indicated.  This ratio differs from the SEC
prescribed "Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges" in its treatment of certain
hybrid securities of MCN and MCN Investment.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           Twelve Months  Twelve Months  Twelve Months 
                                               Ended          Ended          Ended 
                                            December 31,   December 31,   December 31,
                                              1997            1996          1995 
                                            ------------------------------------------
<S>                                         <C>         <C>          <C>
EARNINGS AS ADJUSTED:
Pre-tax Income (1)                          $ 64,738    $  24,208      $ 12,454
Interest capitalized                         (15,002)      (9,398)       (6,249)
Preferred dividend adjustment (2)             39,956       17,989         9,375
Interest rate charges                         40,476       32,696        21,582
                                            --------    ---------      --------
                                             130,168       65,495        37,162
                                            ========    =========      ========

INTEREST RATE CHARGES:                               
Interest expensed                             64,434       40,523        24,151
Interest capitalized                          15,002        9,398         6,249 
Interest implicit in rentals                     996          764           557
Preferred dividends adjustment (2)           (39,956)     (17,989)       (9,375)
                                            --------       ------         -----
                                              40,476       32,696        21,582
                                            ========       ======        ======


Interest Coverage Ratio                         3.22         2.00          1.72
                                                ====         ====          ====

</TABLE>


(1) Income from continuing operations before income taxes 

(2) Preferred dividends expense of MCN allocated to MCN Investment which
includes (a) dividends on the $100,000,000 of 9 3/8%  redeemable preferred
securities of MCN Michigan Limited Partnership, (b) dividends on the
$132,250,000 of 8% FELINE PRIDES of MCN Financing III, (c) interest on the 
$130,000,000 of 6.82% Series Medium-Term Notes issued in conjunction with the
$135,000,000 of 8% Preferred Redeemable Increased Dividend Equity 
Securities of MCN, and (d) dividends on the $80,000,000 of 8 5/8% Trust
Originated Preferred Securities of MCN Financing I.
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.

153A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 18, 2019

Kay Miller Hobart, Attorney at Law, for Graybar Electric Company, Inc.

Ronald D. Williams, II, Assistant Attorney Geneal, for North Carolina Department of Revenue.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 18th of June 2019 by Respondent:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of June 2019."

Respondent shall have up to and including the 29th day of July 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



In connection with this Quarterly Report of Hewitt Associates, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|Date:  July 29, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|-------------------- |  |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  |
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5115]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (09-022)]


Government-Owned Inventions, Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of availability of inventions for licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Patent applications on the inventions listed below assigned to 
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in 
the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for 
licensing.

DATES: March 11, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kaprice L. Harris, Attorney Advisor, 
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field, Code 500-118, Cleveland, OH 
44135; telephone (216) 433-5754; fax (216) 433-6790.
    NASA Case No. LEW-18261-1: A Software Platform for Post-Processing 
Waveform-Based NDE;
    NASA Case No. LEW-18313-1: A Novel Nanoionics-Based Switch for 
Radiofrequency (RF) Applications;
    NASA Case No. LEW-18205-1: Branched Rod-Coil Polyimide-
Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) Copolymers that are Cured in the Solid State 
at Ambient Temperatures.

    Dated: March 4, 2009.
Richard W. Sherman,
Deputy General Counsel.
 [FR Doc. E9-5115 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
Exhibit 32.2

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report (the “Report”) of TCI Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Stephen P. DeSantis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 
| Date: May 13, 2005 | By:   /s/ Stephen P. DeSantis

Stephen P. DeSantis

Executive Vice President, 

Chief Financial Officer

  |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

*Correction:*                     This notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 10, 2009, Volume 74, Number 26, Page 6634. The place and time should read as follows:                

*Time and Date:*                     12 p.m.-3 p.m., March 20, 2009 (Closed).                

*Place:*                     Teleconference.                

*Status:*                     The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                

Dated: February 13, 2009.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E9-4210 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P