alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Chad Cameron COPLEY

No. 195A19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 13, 2019

Marilyn G. Ozer, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, For Copley, Chad Cameron

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 23rd of May 2019 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of June 2019."
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5104 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5104

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1750 16th Street South in St. Petersburg, Florida, as the ``Morris 
                        W. Milton Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2006

Mr. Davis of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1750 16th Street South in St. Petersburg, Florida, as the ``Morris 
                        W. Milton Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MORRIS W. MILTON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1750 16th Street South in St. Petersburg, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Morris W. Milton Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Morris W. 
Milton Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 09-8959.

#### Robert A. Crump, Petitioner v. John Evans, Warden.

559 U.S. 1018, 130 S. Ct. 1912,

176 L. Ed. 2d 386,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2423.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 11

- 00193

- CV

MITCHAEL LOUIS MCCRA Y APPELLANT

V.

AMBER SHEREE MCCRAY APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 231ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JU DGMENT

------------

On June 15, 2011, and July 12, 2011 , we notified appellant, in accordance

with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless

the $175 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). Appellant has not paid

the $175 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court ’s order of August 28, 2007, 2

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 4 2.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 31 , 2011

2 See Supreme Court o f Tex., Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil

Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial

Panel on Multidistrict Litigation , Misc. Docket No. 07

- 9138 (Aug. 28, 2007) (listing

fees in courts of appeals).
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00185

- CV

BEXAR COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT d.b.a. University Health System,

Appellant

v.

Theresa L. ESPINOZA

, Appellee

From the County Court a t Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 385685

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of

appeal are taxed against the party who incurred them.

SIGNED May 20, 2015.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam , Justice
109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4947

AN ACT

To expand the boundaries of the Cahaba River 

National Wildlife Refuge, and for other purposes. 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4947

AN ACT

To expand the boundaries of the Cahaba River National 

Wildlife Refuge, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2

•HR 4947 EH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cahaba River National 

3 Wildlife Refuge Expansion Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

5 In this Act: 

6 (1) REFUGE.—The term ‘‘Refuge’’ means the 

7 Cahaba River National Wildlife Refuge and the 

8 lands and waters in such refuge in Bibb County, 

9 Alabama, as established by the Cahaba River Na10 tional Wildlife Refuge Establishment Act (Public 

11 Law 106–331). 

12 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

13 the Secretary of the Interior. 

14 SEC. 3. EXPANSION OF BOUNDARIES. 

15 (a) EXPANSION.—The boundaries of the Refuge are 

16 expanded to include land and water in Bibb County, Ala17 bama, depicted as ‘‘Proposed National Wildlife Refuge Ex18 pansion Boundary’’ on the map entitled ‘‘Cahaba River 

19 NWR Expansion’’ and dated March 14, 2006. 

20 (b) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The Secretary shall 

21 make the map referred to in subsection (a) available for 

22 inspection in appropriate offices of the United States Fish 

23 and Wildlife Service. 
3

•HR 4947 EH 

1 SEC. 4. ACQUISITION OF LAND AND WATER IN EXPANDED 

2 BOUNDARIES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), the Sec4 retary may acquire by donation, purchase with donated 

5 or appropriated funds, or exchange the land and water, 

6 and interests in land and water (including conservation 

7 easements), within the boundaries of the Refuge as ex8 panded by this Act. 

9 (b) MANNER OF ACQUISITION.—All acquisitions of 

10 land or waters under this section shall be made in a vol11 untary manner and shall not be the result of forced 

12 takings. 

13 (c) INCLUSION IN REFUGE; ADMINISTRATION.—Any 

14 land, water, or interest acquired by the Secretary under 

15 this section—

16 (1) shall be part of the Refuge; and 

17 (2) shall be administered by the Secretary in 

18 accordance with—

19 (A) the National Wildlife Refuge System 

20 Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd 

21 et seq.); 

22 (B) the Cahaba River National Wildlife 

23 Refuge Establishment Act; and 
4

•HR 4947 EH 

1 (C) this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives July 24, 2006. 

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5109 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5109

 To amend the Public Health Service Act to require Senate confirmation 
 for each appointment to serve in the position of Assistant Secretary 
  for Public Health Emergency Preparedness, Department of Health and 
                            Human Services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2006

  Mr. Rogers of Michigan (for himself and Mr. Burgess) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Public Health Service Act to require Senate confirmation 
 for each appointment to serve in the position of Assistant Secretary 
  for Public Health Emergency Preparedness, Department of Health and 
                            Human Services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENATE CONFIRMATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO SERVE AS ASSISTANT 
              SECRETARY FOR PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS.

    (a) In General.--Section 2811(a)(1) of the Public Health Service 
Act (42 U.S.C. 300hh-11(a)(1)) is amended in the second sentence by 
inserting before the period the following: ``, by and with the advice 
and consent of the Senate''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to each individual appointed under section 2811(a)(1) of 
the Public Health Service Act after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
<SEQUENCE>3
<FILENAME>c03925exv32.txt
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
        OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report (as defined under the preceding Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, Peter Lamoureux,
President of Everest Asset Management, Inc. , the general partner of the Everest
Fund, L.P. (the "Fund"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Fund.



                                        By: /s/ Peter Lamoureux
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name: Peter Lamoureux
                                        Title: Director, President and Treasurer
                                        March 31, 2014
No. 09-579.

#### Sheldon Peters Wolfchild, et al., Petitioners v. United States, et al.

559 U.S. 1086, 130 S. Ct. 2090,

176 L. Ed. 2d 755,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3190.

April 19, 2010.

Motion of Historic Shingle Springs Miwok for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 559 F.3d 1228.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

Mr. David K. Paylor Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality 629 East Main Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Dear Director Paylor: 

### DEC , · 0

### 2012

On July 23, 2012, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality (VADEQ). The SIP revision addresses the applicable infrastructure elements specified in section 110(a)(2)(A) through (M) ofthe CleanAir Act (CAA) which are necessary to implement, maintain, and enforce the 2008 ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) in the Commonwealth of Virginia. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing itto prepare a Notice ofProposed Rulemaking (NPR). Ifmembers ofyour staffhave any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Ruth Knapp, Office of Air Program Planning, at (215) 814-2191, or knapp.ruth@epa.gov. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking.

cc: Michael Dowd, Air Division Director

# A~r Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division
Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality

#., '.J Printed on 100% recycled/recyclablepaper with 100%post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free. Customer ServiceHotline; 1-800-438-2474
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4966 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4966

 To require the President to include a line item regarding the Privacy 
and Civil Liberties Oversight Board in the budget submitted pursuant to 
         title 31, United States Code, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2006

   Mr. Hastings of Florida (for himself, Ms. Harman, Mr. Reyes, Mr. 
 Boswell, Mr. Cramer, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Holt, Mr. Ruppersberger, and Mr. 
   Tierney) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
     Committee on the Budget, and in addition to the Committees on 
    Government Reform, the Judiciary, Homeland Security, and Select 
   Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the President to include a line item regarding the Privacy 
and Civil Liberties Oversight Board in the budget submitted pursuant to 
         title 31, United States Code, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRIVACY AND CIVIL LIBERTIES BOARD BUDGET REQUEST 
              REQUIREMENT.

    Section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(35) a separate statement of the proposed budget 
        authority and budget outlays for the Privacy and Civil 
        Liberties Oversight Board.''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE PRIVACY AND CIVIL 
              LIBERTIES OVERSIGHT BOARD.

    Section 1061(l) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention 
Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-458; 118 Stat. 3688) is amended to read as 
follows:
    ``(l) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated $3,000,000 for fiscal year 2007 and each subsequent fiscal 
year to carry out this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
*

The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-1190

___________

Rayon Burns Simmons, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Missouri.

*

United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: May 5, 2005

Filed: May 9, 2005

___________

Before SMITH, FAGG, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Rayon Burns Simmons appeals the district court’s*

 denial of Simmons's motion

to expunge his criminal record. Simmons has provided no basis for the relief he

seeks. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

** This provision, when it became effective in November 1, 1995, was contained in § 2D1.1(b)(4).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20551 Summary Calendar

UNITES STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARK ANTHONY MARTIN, also known as Beau Charles Martin, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-94-CR-143-4

- - - - - - - - - - July 6, 1998 Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Mark Anthony Martin argues that the district court erred in enhancing his offense level based on his obstruction of justice. Martin also argues that he is entitled to be resentenced to determine whether he is entitled to have his offense level adjusted under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(6). **No. 97-20551 -2- We have reviewed the record, including the briefs of the parties, and affirm the sentence imposed by the district court. Martin, personally and through his counsel, misrepresented his identity and his prior arrest history to the magistrate judge. Therefore, the district court did not clearly err in enhancing Martin’s offense level for the obstruction of justice under § 3C1.1. See § 3C1.1, comment. (n.3(f)). Martin is not entitled to have the case remanded for a determination of the effect, if any, of § 2D1.1(b)(6) on his sentence. See United States v. Flores-Ochoa , No. 97-11393, 1998 WL 197668 (5th Cir. Apr. 24, 1998). AFFIRMED.
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

Monograph No. BO25 

09 September 2005 

NSN: 8950-01-393-8422

Item: Worcestershire Sauce 

Document: CID A-A-20099B, Worcestershire Sauce 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: NA Component Classification: Ancillary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 month at 80°F; 6 months at 100°F 

Item Characteristics

Appearance: A thin liquid with a brown to dark-brown color. The Worcestershire sauce may have 

visible sediment which is easily dispersed by agitation. 

Odor: The Worcestershire sauce shall have a tart, fruit-spice odor. 

Flavor: The Worcestershire sauce shall have a tart, fruit-spice flavor. The Worcestershire sauce 

shall be free from fermentation and other objectionable flavors. 

Texture: Fluid and practically free of sediment. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: May darken with visible sediment that is not easily dispersed by agitation. 

Odor: Musty and/or objectionable fermented odor. 

Flavor: Musty and/or objectionable fermented flavor. 

Texture: Increased sediments not easily disbursed by agitation. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Shake well.
STATE of North Carolina v. Nestor Daniel Avila MIRANDA

No. COA18-626

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 16, 2019

NO ERROR.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the quarterly report of Desert Hawk Gold Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned principal executive and financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  August 20, 2012   /s/ Robert E. Jorgensen Robert E. Jorgensen, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

Monograph No. BO4 

09 September 2005 

NSN: 8950-01-396-4011

Item: Creole Sauce 

Document: COTS 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: NA Component Classification: Secondary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 24 months 80°F 

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Dark red/orange tomato sauce uniform in composition with diced tomatoes, green bell 

peppers, celery and onion. 

Odor: Shall possess a prominent tomato and celery odor plus a slight salt onion odor. 

Flavor: Shall possess a prominent tomato and celery flavor plus a slight salt and onion flavor. 

Texture: Chunky tomato sauce consistency with soft vegetables. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Product may darken and/or separate. 

Odor: Musty, bitter, sour or other objectionable odors. 

Flavor: Musty, bitter, sour or other objectionable flavors. 

Texture: May become watery. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA
No. 09-10060.

#### John D. Horton, Petitioner v. Michael B. Donley, Secretary of the Air Force.

560 U.S. 915, 130 S. Ct. 3300,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1202,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3928.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 367 Fed. Appx. 400.
# C_2017282EN.01000101.xml

| 26.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8305 — Rockwell Collins/ B/E Aerospace)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 282/01)

On 11 April 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8305. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8305. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT (10k)

Adopted by the Board of Directors on July 11, 2005.

                                  AMENDMENT TO

                            LINDSAY MANUFACTURING CO.

                          2001 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

The Lindsay Manufacturing Co. 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as previously
amended, is hereby amended as follows:

1. Section 6.02 of the Plan is hereby amended to provide that no automatic
Nonqualified Stock Option grants will be made to Director Participants on
September 3, 2005.

2. Section 8.10 is hereby added to the Plan to read in its entirety as follows:

     "SECTION 8.10 RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS. The Committee may, in its discretion,
     grant to any Employee Participant restricted stock units (RSUs) which will
     be payable in shares of Common Stock and/or in cash on such terms as the
     Committee may determine in its sole discretion, but subject to the same
     restrictions contained in the Plan which apply to grants of Restricted
     Stock. Such Awards may be made as additional compensation for services or
     may be in lieu of other compensation which the Employee Participant is
     entitled to receive from the Corporation. All such RSUs shall constitute
     Awards for all purposes of the Plan, and shall be subject to the limits on
     Awards which are payable in Shares and in cash which are contained in the
     Plan. The Committee may also grant dividend equivalents in connection with
     any such Award which is made under the Plan, on such terms as the Committee
     may determine in its sole discretion pursuant to Section 11.03 of the
     Plan."

This Amendment is adopted, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, by
action of the Board of Directors pursuant to Article XIII of the Plan.


                                       51