alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, James V. Mazzo and Michael J. Lambert, the Chief Executive Officer
and the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certify to the best of their knowledge that:

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 27, 2008 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                     
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 4, 2008 |  |  |  |                                                     
|                      |  |  |  | /s/ JAMES V. MAZZO                                  
|                      |  |  |  | James V. Mazzo,                                     
|                      |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer   
|                      |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | /s/ MICHAEL J. LAMBERT                              
|                      |  |  |  | Michael J. Lambert,                                 
|                      |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Advanced Medical
Optics, Inc. and will be retained by Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp., (the“Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mary Jane Robertson, Executive Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asenacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 1.  this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: April 29, 2005 By:  /s/ *Mary Jane Robertson*    Mary Jane Robertson    Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer   
     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission, or its staff, upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5012 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5012

  For the relief of Rafael Camacho, Rosa B. Camacho, and Rosa Camacho.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2006

  Ms. Waters introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  For the relief of Rafael Camacho, Rosa B. Camacho, and Rosa Camacho.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR RAFAEL CAMACHO, ROSA B. 
              CAMACHO, AND ROSA CAMACHO.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Rafael Camacho, Rosa B. 
Camacho, and Rosa Camacho shall each be eligible for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully 
admitted for permanent residence upon filing an application for 
issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for 
adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Rafael Camacho, Rosa B. Camacho, or 
Rosa Camacho enters the United States before the filing deadline 
specified in subsection (c), he or she shall be considered to have 
entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be 
eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Rafael Camacho, Rosa B. 
Camacho, and Rosa Camacho, the Secretary of State shall instruct the 
proper officer to reduce by 3, during the current or next following 
fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the aliens' birth under section 
203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 
total number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of 
the country of the aliens' birth under section 202(e) of such Act.
                                 <all>
```
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">AR Medical Rehabilitation, P.C., as Assignee of Mitchell Lewen, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>MVAIC, Appellant. </font></b></div><br><br><p>Marshall &amp; Marshall, PLLC (Barbara Carabell of counsel), for appellant.Gary Tsirelman, P.C. (Stefan Belinfanti of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from a decision of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Steven Z. Mostofsky, J.), dated November 19, 2014, and from a judgment of that court entered October 8, 2015. The judgment, entered pursuant to the decision, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $8,557.97.</p><p>ORDERED that so much of the appeal as is from the decision is dismissed, as no appeal lies therefrom (<i>see</i> CCA 1702); and it is further,</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, with $30 costs, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial.</p><p>At a nonjury trial in this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, the sole issue was whether plaintiff's assignor was injured during the underlying motor vehicle accident. Following the trial, the Civil Court awarded judgment to plaintiff. Upon a review of the record, we find that the court erroneously excluded the police report regarding the accident at issue from evidence. As the report was material to the sole issue before the court, we find that a new trial is required.</p><p>Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: October 18, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
No. 09-10074.

#### James Francis, Petitioner v. Kentucky River Coal Corporation.

560 U.S. 915, 130 S. Ct. 3301,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1203,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4030,

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kentucky denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

June 8, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00141

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.L.W., A CHILD

From the 37th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- PA

- 01086 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor , Judge Pr esiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating appellant B.O. ’s parental rights. This appeal is required to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2.

The trial court signed a n order of termination on March 15, 2021. Appellant’s notice of appeal was due to be fi led on April 5, 2021. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 26.1(b). Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on April 13, 2021. A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on April 20 , 2021

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 26.3. Although appellant filed a notice of appeal within the fifteen

- day grace period allowed by Rule 26.3, she did not file a motion for extension of time.

A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time a llowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen

- day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26) ; see also In re K.A.F. , 160 S.W.3d 923 (Tex. 2005) ( noting Verburgt ’s application in parental termination cases) . However, the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. See id. ; T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C).

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant file, no later than June 15, 2 021 from the date of this order, a response presenting a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. If appellant fails to r espond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3(c).

_________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela , JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the s eal of the said

court on this 8th day of June, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Kenneth Hicks, President and a director of Argentex Mining Corporation (Principal Executive Officer), certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Argentex Mining Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:  December 14, 2006

 

/s/ Kenneth Hicks                                            

Kenneth Hicks

President and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)
No. 09-1070.

#### Gary Van Hardy, et ux., Petitioners v. Michigan Department of Treasury.

559 U.S. 1107, 130 S. Ct. 2411,

176 L. Ed. 2d 925,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3740.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004* In connection with the Annual Report of IEA Income Fund IX (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for
the fiscal period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report), the undersigned, Dennis J. Tietz, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Cronos Capital Corp., the General Partner of the Registrant, and John Kallas, the Chief Financial
Officer of Cronos Capital Corp., certify, based on their knowledge, that:  (i)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Registrant. March 24, 2005 By
    
    /s/ Dennis J. TietzDennis J. Tietz,
President and Chief Executive Officer of
Cronos Capital Corp.,
General Partner of the Registrant/s/ John KallasJohn Kallas,
Chief Financial Officer of
Cronos Capital Corp,.
General Partner of the Registrant
 A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE
COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.   *
    
    This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other than as
required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be filed with the Commission or subject to
the rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Kenneth J. Cichocki, as Chief Financial Officer of Home Interiors & Gifts, Inc., (the
Company) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: May 13, 2005/s/ KENNETH J. CICHOCKIKenneth J. CichockiChief Financial Officer
+4.6%

for lot 

number

+9.2%

for expiration 

date

+5.7%

for NDC

Vaccine 2D Barcode Scanning

for Routine Vaccinations

More than 100 million doses1,2 of vaccines are given annually in the

United States. Manual entry of these vaccines into the Electronic Health Record (EHR) can 

be inefficient and result in data entry errors. Today, most vaccines have two-dimensional (2D) 

barcodes, which can help healthcare providers track product identifiers and capture accurate 

and complete data upon vaccine administration.

2D barcode scanning can replace manual entry to improve data accuracy and 

completeness and ensure high quality of patient care.

National Center for Immunization & Respiratory Diseases

Since 2011, CDC and its partners have been exploring the potential of 2D barcoding to streamline 

immunization practices and improve data quality. Three pilot projects demonstrated that 2D barcoding 

can lead to improved vaccine record accuracy and time savings.

Improved Vaccine Record Accuracy3

Scanning can lead to a large increase in vaccine record 

accuracy as compared to manual data entry.

Time Saved3

An average of 21 seconds can be saved per vaccine 

by switching from manual to scanned data entry.

7 seconds for scanned entry

28 secondsfor manual entry

12+ vaccine appointments

added weekly with time

savings(at one pilot site)

1% change impacts +1.3M records 

Small accuracy improvements affect 

large numbers of vaccine records.

It saves time, ensures accurate and consistent

data entry, and provides an extra safety step prior 

to administration.

Survey Respondent

1 vs. in 9 1 in 5,000

records missing 

or inaccurate with 

manual entry

records missing or 

inaccurate when 

scanned

1

Estimated 130+ million vaccine administrations to ages <18 years, extrapolated from sample in Rodgers, et al 2018:

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29249524

2

Estimates of flu vaccines administrations 2022-23 for all ages from CDC, NCIRD:

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/fluvaxview/dashboard/vaccination-dashboard.html

3Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “Findings Report: 2D Barcoding Scalability Pilot.”

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/iis/2d-barcodes/downloads/2D-Findings-Report-508.pdf

For recent findings and publications: www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/iis/2d-vaccinebarcodes/providers.html
No. 09-9217.

#### Darnell Branch, Petitioner v. Franklin J. Tennis, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rockview, et al.

559 U.S. 1042, 130 S. Ct. 2075,

176 L. Ed. 2d 424,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2770.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
No. 09-8968.

#### William R. Harding, Petitioner v. Ohio.

559 U.S. 1052, 130 S. Ct. 2349,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2949.

176 L. Ed. 2d 567,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Montgomery County, denied.

*568Same case below, 180 Ohio App. 3d 497, 905 N.E.2d 1289.
No. 11-7481.

#### Charlotte Kempf, Petitioner v. Karla J. Hansen.

565 U.S. 1180, 132 S. Ct. 1147,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1021,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1010.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 433 Fed. Appx. 660.
tesco1024.htm


Exhibit 10.24












FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


WHEREAS, Dean Ferris (“Executive”) and Tesco Corporation entered into the Employment Agreement dated August 3, 2010 (the “Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, Section 7(i)(v) of the Agreement has an error with respect to the timing of payment and no amount is vested thereunder and the parties desire to amend Section 7(f) of the Agreement to add requirements under new guidance from the Internal Revenue Service;


 


NOW, THEREFORE in consideration of mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed that the Agreement shall be amended as follows:


 



	
1.  

	
Section 7(f) shall be amended to add the following at the end thereof:







 


“Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, to the extent any amounts payable under Sections 7(c), (d) or (e) are deferred compensation and not otherwise exempt from the requirements of Code Section 409A, no payment will be paid or commence to be paid hereunder until the date which is the 60th day after the Date of Termination.”


 



	
2.  

	
Section 7(i)(v) shall be amended so that the word “second” shall be replaced with the word “first” in each place in which it occurs.







 


This First Amendment may be executed by portable document format (pdf) or facsimile signature which signature shall be binding on the parties hereto.


 


WHEREAS, the parties have executed this First Amendment effective as of December 31, 2010.


 


EXECUTIVE                                                                                     TESCO CORPORATION







DEAN FERRIS












/s/ Dean Ferris                                                                By: /s/ Julio M. Quintana 


Dean Ferris                                                                                     Julio M. Quintana


President and CEO






  





1
STATE of North Carolina v. Derrick Lamonz DOWNEY

No. 176P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 10, 2019

Derrick L. Downey, For Downey, Derrick L.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Michael D. Waters, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 10th of May 2019 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Vance County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of May 2019."
Everett S. SCROGGS, Plaintiff, v. TRACTORS ON THE CREEK, LLC, Defendant.

No. COA18-1024

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: April 16, 2019

AFFIRMED IN PART. REVERSED IN PART.
No. 09-448.

#### Bridget Hardt, Petitioner v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company.

559 U.S. 1060, 130 S. Ct. 2088,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3117.

176 L. Ed. 2d 580,

April 16, 2010.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral *581argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.
STATE of North Carolina v. Terry GILMORE

No. 45P07-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Terry Gilmore, for Gilmore, Terry.

Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, Locke Bell, District Attorney, for State of NC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 13th of March 2019 in this *715matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 13th of March 2019 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Gaston County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th of March 2019 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."
No. 09-1050.

#### Marine Express, Inc., Petitioner v. Jerrod Karmin.

559 U.S. 1107, 130 S. Ct. 2405,

176 L. Ed. 2d 925,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3688.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, denied.