alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 09-8555.

#### Philip Bradford Thomas, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

559 U.S. 1011, 130 S. Ct. 1890,

176 L. Ed. 2d 373,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2643.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 09-973.

#### Kenzi Noris Elizabeth Snider, Petitioner v. Seung Lee, et al.

559 U.S. 1038, 130 S. Ct. 2073,

176 L. Ed. 2d 415,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2913.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-*416tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 584 F.3d 193.
Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
    2002
  Form 10-Q
  1.
    This Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and2.
    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.  Dated: October 30, 2008

By:   /s/ Mary Jane RobertsonMary
    Jane Robertson
    Executive Vice President,
    Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
    54
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**OFFICERCERTIFICATION**

 

I, Timothy J. Dodd, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dakota GrowersPasta Company, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

Date:June 16, 2008

 

 
|   | /s/  Timothy J. Dodd                  |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |                                  |
|   | Timothy J. Dodd                       |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Powers of Attorney, Mark W. Pfaff


 Exhibit (10)(k) 

NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY CORPORATION 
 POWERS OF ATTORNEY FOR A LIMITED PURPOSE 
 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of
the undersigned constitutes and appoints each of Matthew M. Grove, Thomas F. English, Paul W. Horrocks, Linda M. Reimer and George E. Silos, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, each with full power of substitution and resubstitution
for him in his name, place and stead, to sign any and all registration statements or other filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission or any state regulatory agency or authority applicable to New York Life Insurance and Annuity
Corporation Variable Annuity Separate Account – II (File Number 033-53344) and any amendments or supplements thereto, and withdrawals thereof, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission or any state regulatory agency or authority granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he might or could do in person in his capacity as a Director or officer of New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corporation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. 
 These Powers of Attorney may be signed in one or more counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same document. 
  

			
		
	  
 Christopher T. Ashe
	  	  

Steven D. Lash

		
	  
 Christopher O.
Blunt
	  	  
 Theodore A. Mathas

		
	  

Frank M. Boccio
	  	 /s/ Mark W. Pfaff
 Mark W. Pfaff

		
	  
 Stephen P. Fisher
	  	  
 Arthur H. Seter

		
	  
 John T. Fleurant
	  	  
 Michael E. Sproule

		
	  
 Robert M. Gardner
	  	  
 Joel M. Steinberg

		
	  
 Solomon Goldfinger
	  	  
 Susan A. Thrope


 Dated: April 5, 2012
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 494 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to expand the 

authority of non-Federal interests to levy harbor fees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2005 

Mr. ROHRABACHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 

to expand the authority of non-Federal interests to levy 

harbor fees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That section 208(a) of Water Resources Development Act 

4 of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2236(a)) is amended— 

5 (1) by inserting ‘‘or container fees’’ after ‘‘ton6 nage duties or fees’’; 

7 (2) in paragraph (1)(A)— 

8 (A) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause 

9 (i); 
2

•HR 494 IH 

1 (B) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of clause 

2 (ii) and inserting ‘‘or’’; and 

3 (C) by inserting after clause (ii) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(iii) to finance the cost of construction 

6 and operation and maintenance of any infra7 structure project for a harbor, including an in8 frastructure project outside the boundaries of 

9 the harbor if the project is for transportation 

10 to, from, or through the harbor; and’’; and 

11 (3) in paragraph (1)(B) by inserting ‘‘and secu12 rity’’ after ‘‘emergency response’’.

Æ
No. 09-9192.

#### Michael Lenoir Smith, Petitioner v. James Yates, Warden, et al.

559 U.S. 1095, 130 S. Ct. 2375,

176 L. Ed. 2d 772,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3655.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5031 

To extend Corridor O of the Appalachian Development Highway System 

from its current southern terminus at I–68 near Cumberland to Corridor 

H, which stretches from Weston, West Virginia, to Strasburg, Virginia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 28, 2006 

Mr. MOLLOHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To extend Corridor O of the Appalachian Development Highway System from its current southern terminus at I– 

68 near Cumberland to Corridor H, which stretches from 

Weston, West Virginia, to Strasburg, Virginia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. APPALACHIAN DEVELOPMENT HIGHWAY SYS4 TEM. 

5 Section 14501 of title 40, United States Code, is 

6 amended by striking subsection (a) and inserting the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(a) PURPOSE.— 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5031 IH 

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Transpor2 tation may assist in the construction of an Appa3 lachian development highway system and local access 

4 roads serving the Appalachian region to provide a 

5 highway system that, in conjunction with the Inter6 state System and other Federal-aid highways in the 

7 Appalachian region, will open an area with develop8 mental potential in which commerce and communica9 tion have been inhibited by lack of adequate access. 

10 ‘‘(2) LIMITATIONS.— 

11 ‘‘(A) CONSTRUCTION.—Construction on 

12 the development highway system described in 

13 paragraph (1) shall not be greater than 

3,1251 14 ⁄2 miles. 

15 ‘‘(B) LOCAL ACCESS ROADS.—There shall 

16 not be more than 1,400 miles of local access 

17 roads that— 

18 ‘‘(i) serve— 

19 ‘‘(I) specific recreational, residen20 tial, educational, commercial, indus21 trial; or 

22 ‘‘(II) similar facilities; or 

23 ‘‘(ii) facilitate a school consolidation 

24 program.’’. 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5031 IH 

1 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF ADDITION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—There is designated as an addi3 tion to Corridor O in Maryland and West Virginia on the 

4 Appalachian Development Highway System a segment 

5 from Interstate Route 68 to Corridor H. 

6 (b) EXTENSION AND DEVELOPMENT.—The addition 

7 to Corridor O shall— 

(1) extend approximately 351 8 ⁄2 miles; and 

9 (2) be developed as a multilane freeway, with 

10 interchanges at appropriate crossroad locations. 

Æ 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. John Thomas COLEY

No. 2A19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 28, 2019

Kimberly P. Hoppin, Attorney at Law, for Coley, John Thomas.

Michael T. Henry, Assistant Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 3rd of January 2019 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of March 2019."
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

| March 25, 2008

  | By:    | /s/                                Harry N. Stout |   |
|------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| (Date)

          |   | Harry N. Stout

President

                                                                                                                                                                                  |   |
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**











**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer of ULURU INC.**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant**


**to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ULURU INC. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the
“Report”), the undersigned officer of ULURU INC. does hereby certify, pursuant
      to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
      (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1.)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2.)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.








Date:
                November 20, 2006
            
            /s/
                Kerry P. GrayKerry
                P. GrayPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer
No. 09-8322.

#### Derrick Williams, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1089, 130 S. Ct. 2146,

176 L. Ed. 2d 763,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3212.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 953, 130 S. Ct. 1543, 176 L. Ed. 2d 136, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 1417.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cortelco Systems Puerto
Rico, Inc. ("Registrant") I, Robert Schnabl, Chief Executive Officer of
Registrant, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.

Date: June 14, 2004                                    /s/ Robert Schnabl
                                                      ------- ------------------
                                                    Robert Schnabl
                                                    Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cortelco Systems Puerto
Rico, Inc. ("Registrant") I, Francisco Sanchez, Chief Financial Officer of
Registrant, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.

Date: June 14, 2004                              /s/ Francisco Sanchez
                                                 --------------------------
                                               Francisco Sanchez
                                               Chief Financial Officer

                                       26
STATE v. Wali Farad Muhammad BILAL

292P03-5

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 15, 2019

Wali Farad M. Bilal, for Bilal, Wali Farad Muhammad

Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Ted Bell, District Attorney, for the State

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th of April 2019 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of April 2019."
25 September 2009 *****************************

NSN: 8940 01 545 1761 * MONOGRAPH NO: FS3-11

 (BMT) *****************************

Item: Beef, Moist Cured/Kippered, Chopped and formed, Strips, Teriyaki [Variety A, Type II, 

Style a, Class 1, Flavor (b)]

Document: CID A-A-20298 Beef and Turkey Snacks, Cured and PKG & QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 77 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80o

F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Dark reddish brown to dark brown surface color with a slightly paler interior. Slightly 

uneven, slightly glossy, fibrous and leathery exterior surface.

Odor: Dried beef, salty, cured, teriyaki, oriental seasoning and ginger.

Flavor: Dried beef, salty, cured, teriyaki, oriental seasoning and ginger.

Texture: Firm, tender to bite, chewy, fibrous and leathery.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Very dark brown, black surface and interior color, dry interior, increased exterior 

oiliness.

Odor: Burnt beef, scorched, artificial smoke, burnt sugar/molasses, low teriyaki odor.

Flavor: Burnt, sour, bitter, caramelized, rancid, metallic, soapy, low teriyaki flavor.

Texture: Mealy chew down, very soft, dry, crumbly, grainy, or very tough, firm and 

chewy/leathery.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Product shall be vacuum packed in foil.

Special Notes: 

First Strike Ration (FSR®) contains 2 servings, 1 barbeque and 1 teriyaki strip are packaged together.
No. 09-10057.

#### Luis Alberto Cardinas Garcia, Petitioner v. United States.

560 U.S. 914, 130 S. Ct. 3299,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1202,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4081.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 596 F.3d 788.
No. 09-8651.

#### Dwayne Underwood, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 983, 130 S. Ct. 1715,

176 L. Ed. 2d 199,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1964.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
TYWAN C

. BEDGOOD

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2463

_______ ______________________/

Opinion filed November 7, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jennie Kinsey , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee , for Appella nt.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS

, C.J., JAY and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
No. 09-8119.

#### Sherwood Brown, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1089, 130 S. Ct. 2145,

176 L. Ed. 2d 762,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3224.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 950, 130 S. Ct. 1533, 176 L. Ed. 2d 131, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 1112.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

** This provision, when it became effective in November 1,

1995, was contained in § 2D1.1(b)(4).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-20551

Summary Calendar

 

UNITES STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARK ANTHONY MARTIN,

also known as Beau Charles

Martin,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-94-CR-143-4

- - - - - - - - - -

July 6, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mark Anthony Martin argues that the district court erred in

enhancing his offense level based on his obstruction of justice. 

Martin also argues that he is entitled to be resentenced to

determine whether he is entitled to have his offense level

adjusted under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(6).**
No. 97-20551

-2-

We have reviewed the record, including the briefs of the

parties, and affirm the sentence imposed by the district court. 

Martin, personally and through his counsel, misrepresented his

identity and his prior arrest history to the magistrate judge. 

Therefore, the district court did not clearly err in enhancing

Martin’s offense level for the obstruction of justice under 

§ 3C1.1. See § 3C1.1, comment. (n.3(f)). Martin is not entitled

to have the case remanded for a determination of the effect, if

any, of § 2D1.1(b)(6) on his sentence. See United States v.

Flores-Ochoa, No. 97-11393, 1998 WL 197668 (5th Cir. Apr. 24,

1998). 

AFFIRMED.
APPALACHIAN MATERIALS, LLC, Petitioner v. WATAUGA COUNTY, A North Carolina County, Respondent and Terry Covell, Sharon Covell, and Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League, Inc., d/b/a High Country Watch, Intervenors

No. 435P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Tyler R. Moffatt, Attorney at Law, Boone, for Appalachian Materials, LLC.

Chelsea Bell Garrett, Attorney at Law, Boone, for Watauga County.

*420***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th of December 2018 by Respondent in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
No. 09-8719.

#### Annette Ross, Petitioner v. Mr. Young, et al.

559 U.S. 1038, 130 S. Ct. 2063,

176 L. Ed. 2d 417,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2753.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 332 Fed. Appx. 822.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-49138,033-22977, 33-22977, and 33-89930 on Form S-8 of our report dated June 13, 2005relating to the consolidated financial statements of MAIR Holdings, Inc.and subsidiaries and management’s report on the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof MAIR Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended March 31,2005.

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Minneapolis,MinnesotaJune 13, 2005

 

----
No. 09-8647.

#### William Washington, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 961, 130 S. Ct. 1565,

176 L. Ed. 2d 149,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1346.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 340 Fed. Appx. 306.