alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that th i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shedan d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e li m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNITED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 11094 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t if f
- A pp el l ee v. S ERGI O M ARQUEZ
- M ENDOZA, D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he N or t her n D i st r i c tof Texas U SDC N o . 4 : 0 8 - CR- 7 5 - ALL B ef ore H IG G IN B O T H AM , D AV IS, an d C L E M E N T , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IAM: * Se r gi o M ar que z - M e ndo z a (M ar que z ) a p p e a l sh i sgu iltyp l e ac o n vic ti o n a nd s e n t e n c e f

o r i l l e g a l r e e n t r y a f

t e r d e p o r t a t i o n i n v i o l a t i o n o f 8 U. S . C . § 1 3 2 6 . H e ar gue s t hathi s c as e s h ou l d be r e m and e d s o t hedi s t r i c tc o ur tc an c o ns i de rt he di s pa r i t y c r e at e d b y e ar ly di s po s i t i o n pr o gr am s . H e a l s o c o nt e nds t hatt he sel ect ive i m pl em en t ati on of “fast- t rack” program s vi ol ates t h e E qu alP rot ect i on C la u se. T h e G overnm en tha s m ovedt o di sm i ss t h e app eal , f or s u m m ary United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I LE D Aug ust18, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 11094

2 a ff i rm a n ce, or, i n the altern a tive , f or a n ex ten sionof ti m e to fil e a n ap p ell a te b r ie f. As M ar que z c o nc e de s , hi s a ppe l l at e a r gum e nt s a r e f o r e c l o s e d b y o ur p r e c e d e n t. S ee Un i t ed S t ate s v. G om ez- Herrera , 5 2 3 F .3d5 5 4 , 5 6 3 n .4 (5 th C ir.) , cer t . den i ed , 1 2 9 S . C t. 6 2 4 (2 0 0 8 ); Un i t ed S t ate s v. R od rigu ez , 523 F. 3d 519, 526 (5 th C ir .), cer t . den i ed , 1 2 9 S . C t. 6 2 4 (2 0 0 8 ). H e ra is e s th e s e a r g u m e n ts s o le ly t o p r e s e rv e t h e m f

o rf u r t h e rr e v i e w. A cco r di ngly, t he di s t r i c tc o ur t ’ s j udg m e nti s AFF I RM ED . The G o v e r n m e n t ’s m o t io n fo rs u m m a r ya ff ir m a n c e is G RA N T E D . T h eG o v e rn m e n t ’s mo t i o n t o d i s mi s s t h e a p p e a la n di t s a l t e r n a t iv e mo t i o n f o ra n e x t e n s i o n o f

t i me t o f i l e a n a p p e l l a t e b r i e f a r e DE NI ED .
No. 09-9153.

#### Harold Roberts, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1023, 130 S. Ct. 1925,

176 L. Ed. 2d 394,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2416.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 983 A.2d 1064.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

June 4, 2013 Session

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. FREDERICK HERRON

Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County

No. 11-04122 Carolyn Wade Blackett, Judge

No. W2012-01195-CCA-R3-CD - Filed January 17, 2014

JAMES CURWOOD WITT, JR., J., dissenting.

As the majority says, this appeal presents a close case. After much

consideration, I respectfully conclude that one error requires a reversal and a new trial.

The error is the Rule 609 issue. The majority concludes that the defendant

loses on this issue because he did not proffer his testimony. Actually, I thought the majority

presented a solid case for holding that a proffer was unnecessary. In a case presenting strong

overtones of a “he said, she said” controversy, the trial court’s improper influencing the

defendant to avoid testifying was especially egregious. As such, I conclude that the error

requires reversal and a new trial.

___________________________________ 

JAMES CURWOOD WITT, JR., JUDGE
1ST AMENDMENT TO THE MMC SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS & INVESTMENT PLAN



 Exhibit 10.30 
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 

MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES 
 SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS & INVESTMENT PLAN 
 WHEREAS, Marsh &
McLennan Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) amended and restated the Marsh & McLennan Companies Supplemental Savings & Investment Plan, effective January 1, 2009 (the “Plan”); 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Employee Benefit Plan Guidelines adopted by the Board of Directors on September 18, 2003 (the
“Guidelines”) and Section 8.1 of the Plan, the Company acting through its Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) or any officer appointed directly or indirectly by the CEO, has the authority to adopt or amend the Plan if the
amendment (a) is required pursuant to law or other requirement having the effect of law or (b) would reasonably be expected to have no more than a de minimis effect on the Company; 

WHEREAS, the Company (i) desires to clarify the payment rules that apply to post-2004 benefits, and (ii) to make certain other
changes to the Plan ; and 
 WHEREAS, it has been determined that the proposed changes to the Plan would be reasonably expected to
have no more than a de minimis effect on the Company. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plans are hereby amended, effective as of
January 1, 2009, as follows: 
 1. Section 5.3(i) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated to read as follows:

 “(i) Determination of Payment Date. Except as may otherwise be provided in Section 5.3(e) with
respect to subsequent distribution elections, no Participant or Beneficiary shall have the right to designate the date or taxable year of payment of any distributions to be made under Sections 5.3(c), (d), (g) or (h) of the Plan.”








 2. Section 9.9 of the Plan is hereby re-numbered as Section 9.10 and a new
Section 9.9 is hereby added after Section 9.8 to read as follows: 
 “Section 9.9.
Section 409A Compliance. Notwithstanding any other provision in the Plan, the terms of each Plan shall in all instances be interpreted in a manner so as to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and Treasury
Regulations issued thereunder.” 
 3. Effective Date. 

The provisions of the First Amendment to the Plan are hereby effective as of January 1, 2009. 

  
 2 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC. has caused this First Amendment
to the Marsh & McLennan Companies Supplemental Savings & Investment Plan to be executed this 26th day of October, 2010 by its authorized officer. 

 

			
	MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Leon J. Lichter
		 	Leon J. Lichter
		 	Vice President, Corporate Human Resources
		 	Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.



  
 3
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-90,902-01

EX P ARTE RAY EDWARD DIXON, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1383372-A IN THE 174 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . Ke asler and Yeary, JJ. c oncur. O P I N I O N Applicant pleade d g uilty an d wa s convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenc ed to three y ears ’ i m p ri s o nment. He did not appea l his conviction. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to thi s Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary beca use he was not made awa re o f a lab repor t showing that he possessed less than the require d four g rams of controlled substance to sustain the char g e. Ba sed on the rec ord, the trial court has deter mined that Applicant’s plea was involuntary

. Relief is g rante d. Ex parte Mable , 443 S.W .3d 129 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014), Brady v. United States , 397 U.S. 742 (1970). The judgme nt in cause number 1383372 in the 174 District Court of t h2

Har ris County is set aside, and Applicant is rema nded to the custody of the Sheriff of Har ris County to answe r the charg es as set out in the i ndictment. The trial court shall issue any nece ssary bench

war rant within ten day s from the da te of this Court’s mandate. Co p ie s o f th is opinion shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice–C o r r e c ti o n a l I nstitut ions Division and the Boa rd of Par dons and Paroles.

Deliver ed: Fe bruar

y 26, 2020 Do not publish
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeWorking With DLAApplicationsDetails

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DDN - DAAS DDN File Format

For access to DDN fill out the System Access Request **For access to DDN fill out the System Access Request: https://home.daas.dla.mil/sar

----

## DDN Information

The purpose of DDN is to provide a standard tool to help organizations develop file and segment headers in support of passing transactions. It provides a means to send transactions using the SFTP protocol. The user creates ASCII files and pushes them to DAAS via SFTP binary mode. DAAS will push response files via the same method. PKI (Public Key Infrastructure) authentication is also available.

----

## **Related Links**

                                  -  DDN Documentation (PDF) 

----

## Assistance and Contact Information

### DAAS Help Desk (DAAS Customers)

Help desk is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week

Phone Number:** (614) 692-6672DSN Number:** (312) 850-6672EMAIL:** itoc@dla.mil

DAASInformation Operatons
**EXHIBIT
            32.2**
  **CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO**
 **18
            U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
            ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
            906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
            connection with the Quarterly Report of United Companies Corporation
            (the
“ Company ”)
            on
            Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the United
            States
            Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
            the
            undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
            certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
            Section 906
            of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
  1.  The
            Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
            of the
            Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  2.  The
            information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
            respects,
            the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
  Date:
                      May 12, 2006
                  By:
                  */s/* 
                    Robert M. CarmichaelName:
                  Robert
                    M. CarmichaelTitle:
                  Chief
                      Financial Officer
  A
            signed
            original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
            document
            authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
            appears
            in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
            required
            by Section 906, has been provided to United Companies Corporation and
            will be
            retained by United Companies Corporation and furnished to the United
            States
            Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 09-9937.

#### Christopher J. Hilton, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1114, 130 S. Ct. 2423,

176 L. Ed. 2d 937,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3842.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 09-1087.

#### Willis W. David, Jr., Petitioner v. Jacqueline M. David.

559 U.S. 1093, 130 S. Ct. 2384,

176 L. Ed. 2d 768,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3656.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Montana denied.

*769Same case below, 354 Mont. 44, 221 P.3d 1209.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 23, 2014

NO. 03-14-00171-CV

A&T Consultants, Ltd., Appellant

v.

Roark Amusement & Vending, L.P., Appellee

APPEAL FROM 419TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on March 7, 2014. A&T 

Consultants, Ltd. filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the 

Court agrees that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and 

dismisses the appeal. A&T Consultants, Ltd. shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in 

this Court and the court below.
No. 09-7577.

#### Jesus Puga-Ochoa, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 975, 130 S. Ct. 1688,

176 L. Ed. 2d 186,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2002.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 323 Fed. Appx. 595.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oxford Ventures, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel
K. Leonard, President, CFO and CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date : November 16, 2005

/s/ Daniel K. Leonard
------------------------
    Daniel K. Leonard
    President and CFO
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Donald Neal, President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, and
Treasurer of American  Goldfields  Inc. (the  "Company"),  certifies,  under the
standards  set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that,  to his
knowledge,  the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
ended April 30, 2007 fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and information  contained in that
Form 10-QSB fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.


Date: June 13, 2007



/s/ Donald Neal
---------------------
Donald Neal
President, Chief Executive Officer,
Secretary, and Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer)


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Multi-Lingual Initiatives Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, April 9, 2009. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Multi-Lingual Initiatives Issue Committee will be held Thursday, April 9, 2009, at 2 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Marisa Knispel. For more information please contact Ms. Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                 

The agenda will include various IRS Issues.

Dated: February 26, 2009. 

Shawn F. Collins, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

 [FR Doc. E9-4669 Filed 3-4-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
No. 09-8802.

#### Daniel L. Spuck, Petitioner v. Catherine C. McVey, Chairwoman, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, et al.

559 U.S. 1034, 130 S. Ct. 2067,

176 L. Ed. 2d 412,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2790.

March 29, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
L1 ANSWER 1 OF 1 REGISTRY COPYRIGHT 2011 ACS on STN 

RN 116018-07-6 REGISTRY 

ED Entered STN: 27 Aug 1988 

CN Propane, 1,1,1,2,2,3,3-heptafluoro-3-[(1,2,2-trifluoroethenyl)oxy]-, 

 polymer with 1-chloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethene and 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethene 

 (CA INDEX NAME) 

OTHER CA INDEX NAMES: 

CN Ethene, chlorotrifluoro-, polymer with 

 1,1,1,2,2,3,3-heptafluoro-3-[(trifluoroethenyl)oxy]propane and 

 tetrafluoroethene (9CI) 

CN Ethene, tetrafluoro-, polymer with chlorotrifluoroethene and 

 1,1,1,2,2,3,3-heptafluoro-3-[(trifluoroethenyl)oxy]propane (9CI) 

CN Propane, 1,1,1,2,2,3,3-heptafluoro-3-[(trifluoroethenyl)oxy]-, polymer 

 with chlorotrifluoroethene and tetrafluoroethene (9CI) 

OTHER NAMES: 

CN Chlorotrifluoroethylene-perfluoro(propyl vinyl ether)-tetrafluoroethylene 

 copolymer 

CN Chlorotrifluoroethylene-tetrafluoroethylene-perfluoro(propyl vinyl ether) 

 copolymer 

MF (C5 F10 O . C2 Cl F3 . C2 F4)x 

CI PMS 

PCT Fluoropolymer, Polyvinyl 

SR CA 

LC STN Files: CA, CAPLUS, CHEMLIST, USPAT2, USPATFULL 

 

 CM 1 

 

 CRN 1623-05-8 

 CMF C5 F10 O 

 

F CF2 CF2 CF3

CF2

C O

 

 CM 2 

 

 CRN 116-14-3 

 CMF C2 F4 

 

F

F

F

F

C C

 

CBI 
 CM 3 

 

 CRN 79-38-9 

 CMF C2 Cl F3 

 

F

CF2

Cl C

 27 REFERENCES IN FILE CA (1907 TO DATE) 

 4 REFERENCES TO NON-SPECIFIC DERIVATIVES IN FILE CA 

 27 REFERENCES IN FILE CAPLUS (1907 TO DATE) 

=> log y 

COST IN JAPANESE YEN SINCE FILE TOTAL 

 ENTRY SESSION 

FULL ESTIMATED COST 328 357 

STN INTERNATIONAL LOGOFF AT 11:31:47 ON 19 JUL 2011
exhibit4-1.htm




EXHIBIT 4.1







PEOPLES BANCORP INC.


138 Putnam Street


Marietta, OH  45750


(740) 373-3155
































February 28,2011












Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, N.E.


Washington, D.C.  20549












RE:  Peoples Bancorp Inc. – Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010












Ladies and Gentlemen:







Peoples Bancorp Inc., an Ohio corporation, is today filing its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Form 10-K”), as executed on February 28, 2011.







Pursuant to the provisions of Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of SEC Regulation S-K, Peoples Bancorp Inc. hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon request, copies of instruments and agreements defining (i) the rights of holders of Peoples Bancorp Inc.’s long-term debt or (ii) the rights of holders of the long-term debt of one of its consolidated subsidiaries, not being filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Form 10-K.  Such long-term debt does not exceed 10% of the total assets of Peoples Bancorp Inc. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.







Very truly yours,







Peoples Bancorp Inc.







/s/ EDWARD G. SLOANE


Edward G. Sloane


Executive Vice President,


Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
No. 09-9484.

#### Jerome Julius Brown, Petitioner v. Brennan C. McCarthy.

559 U.S. 1098, 130 S. Ct. 2384,

176 L. Ed. 2d 777,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3595,

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 368 Fed. Appx. 145.