alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5134 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the participation 

of physical therapists in the National Health Service Corps Loan Repayment Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2006 

Mrs. EMERSON (for herself, Mr. BERRY, Mr. CHANDLER, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island, Ms. 

HERSETH, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. WALDEN of Oregon, Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. PITTS, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. BOREN, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. 

CARDOZA, Mr. SKELTON, Mr. CLEAVER, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. POMEROY, Mr. 

MURTHA, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. SCHWARZ of Michigan, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. 

OSBORNE, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. RENZI, Mr. WELLER, Mr. WAMP, Mr. 

LAHOOD, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr. WICKER, Mr. SWEENEY, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. 

HULSHOF, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. GILCHREST, and 

Mrs. CAPPS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for 

the participation of physical therapists in the National 

Health Service Corps Loan Repayment Program, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5134 IH 

1 SECTION 1. NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE CORPS; PARTICI2 PATION OF PHYSICAL THERAPISTS IN LOAN 

3 REPAYMENT PROGRAM. 

4 (a) MISSION OF CORPS; DEFINITION OF PRIMARY

5 HEALTH SERVICES.—Section 331(a)(3)(D) of the Public 

6 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254d(a)(3)(D)) is amended 

7 by striking ‘‘or mental health,’’ and inserting ‘‘mental 

8 health, or physical therapy,’’. 

9 (b) LOAN REPAYMENT PROGRAM.—Section 338B of 

10 the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254l–1) is 

11 amended— 

12 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘and physi13 cian assistants;’’ and inserting ‘‘physician assistants, 

14 and physical therapists;’’; and 

15 (2) in subsection (b)(1)— 

16 (A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting be17 fore the semicolon the following: ‘‘, or have a 

18 doctoral or master’s degree in physical ther19 apy’’; 

20 (B) in subparagraph (B), by inserting 

21 ‘‘physical therapy,’’ after ‘‘mental health,’’; and 

22 (C) in subparagraph (C)(ii), by inserting 

23 ‘‘physical therapy,’’ after ‘‘dentistry,’’. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
No. 09-8511.

#### Edward Gutierrez, Petitioner v. California.

559 U.S. 1072, 130 S. Ct. 2096,

176 L. Ed. 2d 730,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3354.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District, denied.
---

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kenneth Hicks, President and a director of Argentex Mining
Corporation (Principal Executive Officer), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Argentex Mining Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and
I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change
in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and
I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the
company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
company's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: December 14, 2007





/s/ Kenneth HicksKenneth
Hicks President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

---
No. 09-9308.

#### Ramendra Basu, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1044, 130 S. Ct. 2081,

176 L. Ed. 2d 428,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2872.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 358 Fed. Appx. 187.
No. 09-9728.

#### Gustavo Calderon-Garcia, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1084, 130 S. Ct. 2134,

176 L. Ed. 2d 753,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3228.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 356 Fed. Appx. 754.
No. 08-1315.

#### Pharmacia Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Alaska Electrical Pension Fund, et al.

559 U.S. 1116, 130 S. Ct. 2401,

176 L. Ed. 2d 941,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3687.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 554 F.3d 342.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4730 

To amend title 37, United States Code, to require the phased recovery 

of overpayments of pay and allowances made to members of the uniformed services, to delay the start of overpayment recovery from members 

who are wounded or injured, or who incur an illness, in a combat 

operation or combat zone, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2006 

Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 37, United States Code, to require the phased 

recovery of overpayments of pay and allowances made 

to members of the uniformed services, to delay the start 

of overpayment recovery from members who are wounded 

or injured, or who incur an illness, in a combat operation 

or combat zone, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4730 IH 

1 SECTION 1. PHASED RECOVERY OF OVERPAYMENTS OF 

2 PAY MADE TO MEMBERS OF THE UNIFORMED 

3 SERVICES. 

4 (a) PHASE RECOVERY REQUIRED; MAXIMUM

5 MONTHLY INSTALLMENT.—Subsection (c) of section 1007 

6 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by adding at 

7 the end the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(3) If the indebtedness of a member of the uni9 formed services to the United States is due to the overpay10 ment of pay or allowances to the member through no fault 

11 of the member, the amount of the overpayment shall be 

12 recovered in monthly installments. The amount deducted 

13 from the pay of the member for a month to recover the 

14 overpayment amount may not exceed 20 percent of the 

15 member’s pay for that month.’’. 

16 (b) RECOVERY DELAY FOR INJURED MEMBERS.— 

17 Such subsection is further amended by inserting after 

18 paragraph (3), as added by subsection (a), the following 

19 new paragraph: 

20 ‘‘(4) If a member of the uniformed services is injured 

21 or wounded under the circumstances described in section 

22 310(a)(2)(C) of this title or, while in the line of duty, in23 curs a wound, injury, or illness in a combat operation or 

24 combat zone designated by the Secretary of Defense, any 

25 overpayment of pay or allowances made to the member 

26 while the member recovers from the wound, injury, or ill-
3 

•HR 4730 IH 

1 ness may not be deducted from the member’s pay until 

2 after the end of the 90-day period beginning on the date 

3 on which the member is notified of the overpayment.’’. 

4 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Such subsection is 

5 further amended— 

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘Under regula7 tions’’; 

8 (2) by striking ‘‘his pay’’ both places it appears 

9 and inserting ‘‘the member’s pay’’; 

10 (3) by striking ‘‘However, after’’ and inserting 

11 the following: 

12 ‘‘(2) After’’; and 

13 (4) by inserting ‘‘by a member of the uniformed 

14 services’’ after ‘‘actually received’’. 

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ GEOFFREY S. M. HEDRICK             |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Geoffrey S. M. Hedrick                 |   |
| *Chief Executive Officer and Director* |   |
| January 29, 2018                  |   |
|                                   |   |
| /s/ RELLAND M. WINAND                  |   |
| Relland M. Winand                      |   |
| *Chief Financial Officer*              |   |
| January 29, 2018                  |   |

 

----
DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PILOT PROJECT June 9, 

2015

Fabric Nomenclature MAN’S RAINCOAT INTERIM SHADE, ARMY A-A-55229

Shade Number BLUE 358 Piece/Roll Number 3888

Equipment type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included -

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp 

OFF

ID Rectangular L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* DEcmc*

Standard 3888 -------------------- 15.33 0.87 -3.91

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY
No. 11-191.

#### Michigan, Petitioner v. Charles Fackelman.

565 U.S. 1059, 132 S. Ct. 759,

181 L. Ed. 2d 483,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8658.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Michigan denied.

Same case below, 489 Mich. 515, 802 N.W.2d 552.
No. 09-9655.

#### Marian Jass, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1087, 130 S. Ct. 2128,

176 L. Ed. 2d 757,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3207.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 569 F.3d 47.
Opinion issued May 16, 2013

 

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________

NO. 01-12-01088-CV

____________

ALLSTATE TEXAS LLOYDS, Appellant

V.

WALTER GAFFNEY JR. A/N/F WALTER GAFFNEY III, Appellee

On Appeal from the 190th District Court 

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-80273

MEMORANDUM OPINION
2

This is an appeal from a judgment signed August 30, 2012. On May 3, 2013, 

the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal because they have entered into a 

settlement agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1. They also request that this Court 

expedite issuance of the mandate.

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(2), 43.2(e). The Clerk is directed to issue mandate within 10 days of the 

date of this opinion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1. We dismiss any other pending 

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Bland.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50387

Summary Calendar

ROBROY INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOSEPH SCHWALBACH; CL SYSTEMS CORPORATION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas 

Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that appellant’s unopposed motion for limited remand

to USDC for the Western District of Texas, Midland-Odessa Division, for the

limited purposes to permit the district court to grant Appellant’s Rule 60(b)(1)

motion is GRANTED. 

We REMAND for the limited purpose of permitting the district court to

grant the Rule 60(b) relief, vacating the judgment and reopening the record.

Once that has been accomplished, the parties can appeal to this court from any

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 18, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-50387

2

final order. See Karaha Bodas Co., L.L.C. v. Perusahaan Perambangan Minyak

Dan Gas Bumi Negara, No. 02-20042, 2003 WL 21027134, at *5 (5th Cir. March

5, 2003). This remand is WITHOUT PREJUDICE to any issue or argument

raised in this appeal.

REMANDED.
# C_2017356EN.01000301.xml

| 21.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 356/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 356/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8646 — Platinum/Pattonair)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 356/05)

On 16 October 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8646. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8646. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. v. Gary W. SCHMITT and May L. Schmitt

No. 19P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Brian M. Rowlson, Attorney at Law, Michael C. Griffin, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Bank of America, N.A.

Stuart Sloan, Attorney at Law, for Schmitt, Gary W., et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendants on the 15th of January 2019 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of March 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 15th of January 2019 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
# Irish-American Heritage Month, 2009

Even before the birth of our Nation, the sons and daughters of Erin departed their homes in search of liberty and a more hopeful future.  As these early pioneers left familiar lands, they carried with them the rich traditions of home.  This March we honor their journey and their lasting contributions to the history and culture of the United States.

Following the colonial migrations, the United States enjoyed the greatest influx of Irish during the 1840s as Ireland suffered the Great Famine.  Hungry but hopeful, poor but perseverant, Irish-Americans seized the opportunity to work hard, enjoy success, and pursue the American Dream.

Many took on the difficult work of constructing America’s infrastructure.  Others assumed positions of leadership.  Among those leaders were signers of the Declaration of Independence and Presidents of the United States.  Still others enjoyed great success and influence in the arts and literature.  From social activists to business leaders, athletes to clergy, and first responders to soldiers, distinguished Irish-Americans have made indelible contributions to our national identity.

Today, tens of millions of Irish-Americans can look back with pride on the legacy of their forebears.  Irish-Americans are integral to the rich fabric of the United States, and we are grateful for their service and contributions.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim March 2009 as Irish-American Heritage Month.  I encourage all Americans to observe this month with appropriate ceremonies, programs, and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this second day of March, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third.

[FR Doc. E9-4855

Billing code 3195-W9-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4986]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[TeleSoft Partners II SBIC, L.P.; License No. 09/79-0432]

Notice Seeking Exemption Under Section 312 of the Small Business 
Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest

    Notice is hereby given that TeleSoft Partners II SBIC, L.P., 950 
Tower Lane, Suite 1600, Foster City, CA 94404, a Federal Licensee under 
the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (``the Act''), in 
connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an 
exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings 
which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business 
Administration (``SBA'') Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). 
TeleSoft Partners II SBIC, L.P. proposes to provide equity financing to 
Calient Networks, Inc., 2665 North First Street, Suite 204, San Jose, 
CA 95134. The financing is contemplated for working capital and general 
corporate purposes.
    The financing is brought within the purview of section107.730(a)(1) 
of the Regulations because TeleSoft Partners II, L.P., TeleSoft 
Partners II QP, L.P. and TeleSoft NP Employee Fund, L.L.C, all 
Associates of TeleSoft Partners II SBIC, L.P., in the aggregate own 
more than ten percent of Calient Networks, Inc.
    Therefore, this transaction is considered a financing of an 
Associate requiring an exemption. Notice is hereby given that any 
interested person may submit written comments on the transaction within 
fifteen days of the date of this publication to the Acting Associate 
Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 
Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.

    Dated: February 25, 2009.
Harry Haskins,
Acting Associate Administrator for Investment.
 [FR Doc. E9-4986 Filed 3-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```
No. 09-779.

#### Elmon Walters, et al., Petitioners v. American Coach Lines of Miami, Inc.

559 U.S. 1048, 130 S. Ct. 2343,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2974.

176 L. Ed. 2d 561,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 575 F.3d 1221.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00064-CV

QuikTrip Corporation

v.

Glenn Goodwin, Individually and on 

Behalf of the Estate of Melanie 

Therese Goodwin, and Peggy 

Goodwin, Individually and on Behalf 

of the Estate of Melanie Therese 

Goodwin

§

§

§

§

From the 393rd District Court

of Denton County (2009-60224-393)

November 13, 2014

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the 

trial court is reversed, and we render a take-nothing judgment for QuikTrip 

Corporation.

It is further ordered that appellees Glenn Goodwin and Peggy Goodwin

shall pay all of the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston