alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quinton Cardiology Systems
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R.
Hinson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
         section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result
         of operations of the Company.

                                         By: /s/ John R. Hinson
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             John R. Hinson
                                             Chief Executive Officer

         Date: April 27, 2004

                                       30
# C_2016359EN.01000501.xml

| 30.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/5

---

Notice for the attention of the data subject to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 753/2011, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1736 concerning restrictive measures directed against directed against certain individuals, groups, undertakings and entities in view of the situation in Afghanistan applies

(2016/C 359/04)

The attention of data subject is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Regulation (EU) No 753/2011 (2), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1736 (3).

2

3

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation EU) No 753/2011, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1736.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (4).

4

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 199, 2.8.2011, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 264, 30.9.2016, p. 8.

3

(4)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

4

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4911 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4911

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
  To temporarily extend the programs under the Higher Education Act of 
                      1965, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Higher Education Extension Act of 
2006''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAMS.

    Section 2(a) of the Higher Education Extension Act of 2005 (Public 
Law 109-81; 20 U.S.C. 1001 note) is amended by striking ``March 31, 
2006'' and inserting ``June 30, 2006''.

SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    Nothing in this Act, or in the Higher Education Extension Act of 
2005 as amended by this Act, shall be construed to limit or otherwise 
alter the authorizations of appropriations for, or the durations of, 
programs contained in the amendments made by the Higher Education 
Reconciliation Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-171) to the provisions of 
the Higher Education Act of 1965 and the Taxpayer-Teacher Protection 
Act of 2004.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Fred B. Zaziski, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Falcon Natural Gas Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Falcon Natural Gas Corp.

DATE: November 15, 2004                    By: /s/ Fred B. Zaziski
                                              --------------------
                                              Fred B. Zaziski
                                              Chief Executive Officer

<PAGE>
No. 09-1005.

#### Linda Puglisi, et al., Petitioners v. Robert L. Pavone, et al.

559 U.S. 1092, 130 S. Ct. 2377,

176 L. Ed. 2d 767,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3493.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

*768Same case below, 353 Fed. Appx. 622.
No. 09-10280 (09A979).

#### Darryl Durr, Petitioner v. Ted Strickland, Governor of Ohio, et al.

559 U.S. 1087, 130 S. Ct. 2147,

176 L. Ed. 2d 757,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3475.

April 19, 2010.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Stevens, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 602 F.3d 788.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
FOR THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [Reserved]c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Bahman AtefiName: Bahman AtefiTitle: Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
**PURSUANT TO**
**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alion Science and Technology Corporation (the“Corporation”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bahman Atefi, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.
Date: June 13, 2005    By: /s/ Bahman Atefi   Name: Bahman Atefi Title: Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 28, 2009 

p0921 

Order 

 

September 28, 2009 

138551 

MICHIGAN CITIZENS FOR WATER 

CONSERVATION, R. J. DOYLE, BARBARA 

DOYLE, JEFFREY R. SAPP and SHELLY M. 

SAPP, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 138551 

 COA: 288392 

Mecosta CC: 01-014563-CE 

NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA INC., 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

DONALD PATRICK BOLLMAN and NANCY 

GALE BOLLMAN, a/k/a PAT BOLLMAN 

ENTERPRISES, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 4, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No. 09-727.

#### Rodrique Bradley, Petitioner v. Louisiana.

559 U.S. 1068, 130 S. Ct. 2093,

176 L. Ed. 2d 723,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3426.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit, denied.

Same case below, 997 So. 2d 694.
No. 09-765.

#### Polar Equipment, Inc., dba Cook Inlet Processing, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Grant Baker, et al.

559 U.S. 972, 130 S. Ct. 1700,

176 L. Ed. 2d 183,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2102.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 338 Fed. Appx. 708.
No. 09-9052.

#### Bernard Blake Allen, et ux., Petitioners v. United States.

559 U.S. 1021, 130 S. Ct. 1920,

176 L. Ed. 2d 391,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2401.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 343 Fed. Appx. 983.
No. 09-817.

#### Dewayne Tarver, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Duly Commissioned Officer by the Village of Turkey Creek, Petitioner v. Michell B. Deville, et vir.

559 U.S. 1048, 130 S. Ct. 2343,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3101.

176 L. Ed. 2d 561,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 567 F.3d 156.
Exhibit 10.3

 

Summary Description of Severance Arrangement with Stephen DeSantis

 

Mr. DeSantis shall be entitled to a severance payment in the amount of twelve months’ salary and twelve months’ continued benefits, plus a pro-rated bonus beginning June 30, 2005, provided that Mr. DeSantis remains employed by TCI Solutions, Inc. (“TCI”) through June 30, 2005 or is terminated without cause (as defined in his employment agreement with TCI) prior to June 30, 2005 (in which case he will receive such amounts upon his termination).  If Mr. DeSantis is terminated for cause, as defined in his employment agreement, or if he resigns prior to June 30, 2005, he will not be entitled to the aforementioned severance and benefits.  Mr. DeSantis shall be entitled to a bonus of $39,000 if he remains employed through June 30, 2005 or is terminated by TCI without cause prior to June 30, 2005.  Mr. DeSantis shall also be entitled to a bonus of $19,500 for each quarter he remains employed withTCI after June 30, 2005, which bonus shall be pro-rated for partial periods, if any.  Payments under the above-described severance arrangement are intended to be in lieu of, and not in addition to, payments and benefits Mr. DeSantis would otherwise be entitled to under his employment agreement.
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter

Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

Nos. 04-1212

04-1605

BRIAN J. DASEY,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Rya W. Zobel, U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Boudin, Chief Judge,

Torruella and Lynch, Circuit Judges.

Brian J. Dasey on brief pro se.

Thomas Reilly, Attorney General, and Matthew Q. Berge,

Assistant Attorney General, on Memorandum in Support of Motion for

Summary Disposition for appellees.

October 28, 2004
-2-

Per Curiam. In No. 04-1212, appellant Brian Dasey

appeals from the district court's denial of his motions under

Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), for reconsideration, and for sanctions.

In No. 04-1605, he appeals from the denial of a second motion for

reconsideration and a motion for leave to supplement his filings.

After careful review of the record and the parties'

arguments, we affirm the judgments below, concluding that the

district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Dasey's

motions. We agree substantially with the reasoning in the

district court's Memorandum of Decision dated January 29, 2004,

and its March 2, 2004 endorsed order denying reconsideration. In

addition, as appellees contend, Dasey may not use a Rule 60(b)

motion to relitigate issues already decided by this court, Dasey

v. Anderson, 304 F.3d 148, 151 (1st Cir. 2002), or to raise

issues that might have been, but were not, asserted in prior

court proceedings. 12 Moore's Fed. Prac. § 60.48[3][c], at 60-

174.1 (3d ed. 2003) (confirming that a party's "[f]ailure to take

advantage of an opportunity to litigate an issue precludes use of

that issue to secure" Rule 60(b)(6) relief). Finally, Dasey's

motions failed to establish the alleged "fraud on the court."

The judgments in the above appeals are affirmed. 1st

Cir. Loc. R. 27(c).
No. 09-9227.

#### Socrates Ostoposides, Petitioner v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al.

559 U.S. 1095, 130 S. Ct. 2376,

176 L. Ed. 2d 773,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3668.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
# C_2017132EN.01000701.xml

| 26.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/7

---

Special Report No 6/2017

‘EU response to the refugee crisis: the “hotspot” approach’

(2017/C 132/03)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 6/2017 ‘EU response to the refugee crisis: the “hotspot” approach’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
No. 09-9546.

#### Anthony Moreland, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1079, 130 S. Ct. 2118,

176 L. Ed. 2d 743,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3462.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 355 Fed. Appx. 376.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5045 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5045

  To amend the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 to allow community 
  reinvestment credit for investments and other financial support to 
      enable veterans to purchase residential homes or to assist 
   organizations with the establishment of housing opportunities and 
                assisted living facilities for veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2006

  Mr. Lynch introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 to allow community 
  reinvestment credit for investments and other financial support to 
      enable veterans to purchase residential homes or to assist 
   organizations with the establishment of housing opportunities and 
                assisted living facilities for veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``A Home for the Brave Act''.

SEC. 2. COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT CREDITS FOR CERTAIN SUPPORT FOR 
              VETERANS.

    Section 804 of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (12 U.S.C. 
2903) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) Homes for Veterans.--In assessing and taking into account, 
under subsection (a), the record of a financial institution, the 
appropriate Federal financial supervisory agency shall consider, as a 
factor, capital investments, low interest loans, loan participation, 
technical assistance, and grants by the institution to support or 
enable--
            ``(1) any veteran (as such term is defined in section 101 
        of title 38, United States Code) to purchase a home for use as 
        the principal residence of the veteran; and
            ``(2) any entity that is establishing housing opportunities 
        or assisted living facilities for veterans to carry out such 
        activities.''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4805 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

105 North Quincy Street in Clinton, Illinois, as the ‘‘Gene Vance Post 

Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2006 

Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois (for himself, Mr. HASTERT, Mr. KIRK, Mr. EMANUEL, Mrs. BIGGERT, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. SHIMKUS, 

Mr. WELLER, Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. MANZULLO, Ms. 

BEAN, Mr. EVANS, Mr. LAHOOD, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. RUSH, Mr. 

JACKSON of Illinois, and Mr. HYDE) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 105 North Quincy Street in Clinton, Illinois, 

as the ‘‘Gene Vance Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GENE VANCE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 105 North Quincy Street in Clin6 ton, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Gene 

7 Vance Post Office Building’’. 
2 

•HR 4805 IH 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Gene Vance Post Of5 fice Building’’. 

Æ
EXHIBIT  99


                                 CERTIFICATE OF
                           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Koger
Equity, Inc. (the "Company") that he has reviewed this annual report and, to the
best of his knowledge and belief, the annual report of the Company on Form 10-K
for the annual period ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that the
annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary in order to make the report not misleading,
and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such
period and the results of operations and cash flows of the Company for such
period.


Dated:  March 28, 2003          /s/ Thomas J. Crocker
                                ---------------------------
                                 Thomas J. Crocker
                                Chief Executive Officer
                                (Principal Executive Officer)
                                 Koger Equity, Inc.

Dated:  March 28, 2003          /s/ Steven A. Abney
                                ---------------------------
                                Steven A. Abney
                                Vice President, Finance
                                (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
                                Koger Equity, Inc.