alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p130055c.eng.txt[3/4/2013 12:03:06 PM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0055 , 0056

Focus Ready Draft 12/13/2012

ENGINEER: Hall \ REC

MSDS: Yes Label: No

Gen Eqpt: Chemical resistant protective gloves; safety

glasses with side-shields or tightly fitting safety

goggles (chemical goggles); and body protection such as

head protection, apron, protective boots, and

chemical-protection suit.

Respirator: Wear a NIOSH-certified (or equivalent)

organic vapour/particulate respirator. For situations

where the airborne concentrations may exceed the level

for which an air purifying respirator is effective, or

where the levels are unknown or Immediately Dangerous to

Life or Health (IDLH), use NIOSH-certified full facepiece

pressure demand self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA)

or a full facepiece pressure demand supplied-air

respirator (SAR) with escape provisions.

Health Effects: May cause severe irritation to eyes.;

inhalation may cause respiratory irritation; and

ingestion may result in severe irritation or burns of the

mouth, esophagus and stomach.

TLV/PEL:

None Established
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p130055c.eng.txt[3/4/2013 12:03:06 PM]

SAT (concerns) (11/14/2012):

Migration to groundwater: Moderate to Rapid

PBT rating: P1B1T2 PBT Rating: P1B1T2 SAT concerns

ratings are identical for P13-0055 and P13-0056.

Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1.00 ppb)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p130055c.eng.txt[3/4/2013 12:03:06 PM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0055 , 0056
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p130055c.eng.txt[3/4/2013 12:03:06 PM]

 

 

 
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p130055c.eng.txt[3/4/2013 12:03:06 PM]

 b) Hazard Rating for health of 2 or greater? 2 Yes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p130055c.eng.txt[3/4/2013 12:03:06 PM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0055 , 0056
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p130055c.eng.txt[3/4/2013 12:03:06 PM]
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p130055c.eng.txt[3/4/2013 12:03:06 PM]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p130055c.eng.txt[3/4/2013 12:03:06 PM]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p130055c.eng.txt[3/4/2013 12:03:06 PM]
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p130055c.eng.txt[3/4/2013 12:03:06 PM]
d1277738_ex4-9.htm



Exhibit 4.9


 


AMENDMENT TO RESTATED MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment to the Restated Management Agreement (this "Amendment") is a written confirmation of the decision made by the Board of Directors of the Company on November 4, 2011, and is intended to be effective as of the 1st day of December, 2011 (the "Effective Date"), by and between Nordic American Tankers Limited, a Bermuda company (the "Company"), and Scandic American Shipping Ltd., a Bermuda company ("Scandic").


 


W I T N E S S E T H:


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Scandic are parties to a management agreement restated as of June 30, 2004, as further amended on October 12, 2004, April 29, 2005, November 19, 2005, May 3, 2008, May 31, 2009 and May 6, 2011 (the "Restated Management Agreement");


 


WHEREAS, Section 3(a) of the Restated Management Agreement currently provides, inter alia, that the Company shall pay Scandic an annual fee of $350,000;


 


WHEREAS, the board of directors of the Company increased the annual fee payable to Scandic by the Company from $350,000 to $500,000;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and Scandic hereby agree as follows:


 


1.            Effective as of the Effective Date, Section 3(a) of the Restated Management Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:


 


"In consideration for Scandic's providing the services to the Company specified in this Agreement, the Company shall pay Scandic a fee at the annual rate of USD 500,000 (the "Fee") and cover Scandic's reasonable costs incurred to perform the abovementioned services (the "Costs"). The Fee shall be paid quarterly in advance, on each January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1. The Costs shall be paid monthly in advance through a monthly cash call procedure to be agreed between the parties."


 


2.           The Restated Management Agreement shall otherwise remain in full force and effect.


 


3.           This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, and all counterparts so executed shall constitute one agreement, binding on all of the parties hereto, notwithstanding that all the parties are not signatory to the original or the same counterpart.


 


 


[SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]


 






  





  











  











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this written confirmation of the Amendment to the Restated Management Agreement, effective as of the Effective Date.


 



	  	
NORDIC AMERICAN TANKERS LIMITED


	  	  
	  	  
	  	  	  
	  	
By

	  
	  	  	
Name:


	  	  	
Title:


	  	  
	  	
SCANDIC AMERICAN SHIPPING LTD.


	  	  
	  	  	  
	  	
By

	
/s/ Herbjørn Hansson


	  	  	
Name: Herbjørn Hansson


	  	  	
Title:













	
/s/ Andreas Ove Ugland

	  	  
	
Andreas Ove Ugland

	  	  
	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	
 
/s/ Sir David Gibbons



	  	  
	
Sir David Gibbons

	  	  
	  	  	  
	
 
/s/ Paul J. Hopkins



	  	  
	
Paul J. Hopkins

	  	  
	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	
s/ Richard H. K. Vietor

	  	  
	
Richard H. K. Vietor

	  	  
	  	  	  
	
 
/s/ Jim Kelly



	  	  
	
Jim Kelly

	  	  
	  	  	  
	
/s/ Jan Erik Langangen

	  	  
	
Jan Erik Langangen
SERVED: AUGUST 28, 2014
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF JOHN WALSH DOCKETNO. FAA-2014-0550 (Civil Penalty Action)

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2014S0190010) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other

Attachment

- Service List

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. 

### MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COfY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY 

### Stuart A. Goldstein, Respondent's Counsel 

### Stuart A. Goldstein, P.A. 7300 North Kendall Drive, Suite 380 Miami, FL 33156 TEL: 305-670-1222 FAX: 305-400-0685 Christopher R. Stevenson, Complainant's Counsel 

### Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AS0-7 SouthernRegion 1701 Columbia Avenue College Park, GA 30337 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0550 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 IndependenceAvenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
----

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                   |                                                 |                          |
|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                   | STUDIO ONE MEDIA, INC.                               |
|                   |                                                 |                          |
| Date: November 4, 2011 | By:                                        | /s/  Kenneth R. Pinckard |
|                   | Kenneth R. Pinckard                                  |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer |

----
# C_2017284EN.01000301.xml

| 29.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8568 — Total/Atos/Intouch Corp/Intouch SAS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 284/05)

On 22 August 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8568. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8568. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1









COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC.

2011 BONUS PLAN



Formula for Participants




BONUS = Salary x BF1 x BF2 x BF3



Bonus Factor 1 (“BF1” or “Target Factor”) = the factor awarded to participants in the plan (as a
percent of base salary).



Bonus Factor 2 (“BF2” or “The Company Factor”) is based on EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure
calculated by adding interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization to net income, and adjusted by
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors to eliminate the effects of gains and losses
on forward exchange contracts and other gains and losses or extraordinary income or expense not
foreseen at the time the 2011 Bonus Plan was established. The Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors reserves the right to review, modify and approve the final adjusted EBITDA calculation
as it relates to the 2011 Bonus Plan for the sole purpose of ensuring that the bonus payments are
calculated with the same intentions for which the targets have been established for the current
year.



The target level payment is based on the Company’s business plan for the current year and would
result in a 100% payout. The minimum threshold level for a payout under the 2011 Bonus Plan is
based on the minimum acceptable performance of the Company resulting in a 50% payout. The maximum
potential payout under the 2011 Bonus Plan is set at 150% payout. Payments below the minimum
threshold or above the maximum potential payout are considered discretionary and are subject to
specific review and approval of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.



Bonus Factor 3 (“BF3” or “The Individual Factor”) consists of a mix of measures specific to each
participant’s responsibilities and to reflect the results necessary for continued growth and the
Company’s short and long term objectives. Objectives for each position are assigned annually and
tie to the individual performance of each participant with respect to their specific
responsibilities in support of the overall company goals, including but not limited to: (1) cash
flow, (2) operating and cost reduction initiatives, (3) strategic initiatives, (4) product
development and (5) revenue growth. Such measures are important to the company’s immediate and
long-term objectives, require a significant effort on the individual’s part and support the
operating and financial targets for the 2011 business plan within each participant’s functional
area. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors reserves the right to review, modify and
approve, at its sole discretion, all BF3 percentages for plan participants.



The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors further reserves the right, at its sole
discretion, to review and modify the formula and factors discussed above when determining specific
2011 bonus payments under the 2011 Bonus Plan to insure the awards are derived with the same
intention for which the targets and thresholds have been established for the current year.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ALAN TROY HOUSER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 180 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of November, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
# C_2017233EN.01000101.xml

| 19.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8495 — Cummins/Eaton Corporation/Eaton JV business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 233/01)

On 4 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8495. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8495. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2017364EN.01000101.xml

| 27.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8650 — LGP/CPA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 364/01)

On 20 October 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8650. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8650. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 42 (Thursday, March 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9604-9605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4760]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public hearing agenda.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date and Time: Tuesday, March 17, 2009, 1-3 p.m.

Place: U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave, NW., 
Suite 150, Washington, DC 20005 (Metro Stop: Metro Center).

[[Page 9605]]


Agenda: The Commission will receive presentations on the following 
topic: Voter Registration Databases: Initial Discussion on Reviewing 
HAVA Mandated Guidance.
    This hearing will be open to the public.

Person to Contact for Information: Bryan Whitener. Telephone: (202) 
566-3100.

Alice Miller,
Chief Operating Officer, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-4760 Filed 3-3-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P
No. 11-7780.

#### Reginald Steward, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1169, 132 S. Ct. 1122,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1001,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 647.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 16 A.3d 974.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

KENNETH GESSESSE HAWTHORNE, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

.

No. 4D2023

- 1208

[ May 2, 2024 ]

Appeal from the C ircuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit , Palm

Beach County ; Scott Suskauer , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2017

- CF

- 003118

- AXXX

- MB

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Sue

- Ellen Kenny, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pablo Tapia,

Assist ant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

M AY
, L EVINE and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Summary of Oral Agreement between the Company and Paramount Trading Ltd.


 


The Company has verbally agreed to repay to Paramount Trading Ltd. all amounts that have been or may in the future, from time to time, be advanced to it or any third parties on behalf of the Company on the earliest to occur of any one of the following events (a) a Business Combination, (b) the third anniversary of the date such advance was made and (c) the Company becoming insolvent.  “Business Combination” means an acquisition by or of the Company by merger, capital stock exchange, asset or stock acquisition, reorganization or otherwise, of or with an operating business.  The Company has verbally agreed that it would
repay such amounts at an interest rate equal to five (5) percent per annum.
No. 09-9379.

#### Jimmie Odell Bruner, Petitioner v. Oklahoma.

559 U.S. 1109, 130 S. Ct. 2409,

176 L. Ed. 2d 929,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3870,

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0302

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

BRANDON JAMES LEWIS TOLLIE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 12, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 5 2021

01/05/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0302
No. 09-8206.

#### Gregory Shawn Mercer, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Virginia.

559 U.S. 969, 130 S. Ct. 1731,

176 L. Ed. 2d 178,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2195.

March 1, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until March 22, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AFV Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Steele, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/Carlos Zalduondo |
|--------|---------------------|

|   | Carlos Zalduondo |
|--------|------------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|

|   | November 9, 2007 |
|--------|------------------|
No. 09-8965.

#### Joseph D. Thornblad, Petitioner v. Robin Christopher Vue-Benson, et al.

559 U.S. 1052, 130 S. Ct. 2349,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3085.

176 L. Ed. 2d 567,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.