alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Robert O. Wilkins, Chief Financial Officer of Joning Corp. certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Joning Corp.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report
(the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

     6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


October 11, 2004

/s/  Robert O. Wilkins
-----------------------------
     Robert O. Wilkins
     Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 5, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14273-14274]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05027]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID DoD-2013-OS-0019]

Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a System of Records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Logistics Agency is deleting a system of records 
notice in its existing inventory of record systems subject to the 
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective on April 5, 2013 unless 
comments are received which result in a contrary determination. 
Comments will be accepted on or before April 4, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
    * Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
    * Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 4800 Mark Center 
Drive, East Tower, 2nd Floor, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350-3100.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jody Sinkler, DLA FOIA/Privacy Act 
Office, Headquarters, Defense Logistics Agency, ATTN: DGA, 8725 John J. 
Kingman Road, Suite 1644, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6221, or by phone at 
(703) 767-5045.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Logistics Agency system of 
records notice subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 
amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are available 
from the address in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The proposed 
deletions are

[[Page 14274]]

not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or 
altered system report.

    Dated: February 28, 2013.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
S335.01

System name:
    Training and Employee Development Record System (August 11, 2010, 
75 FR 48655)

Reason:
    The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) systems of records notice, 
S335.01, Training and Employee Development Record System, duplicates 
existing DoD-wide and OPM/Government-wide Privacy Act systems of 
records which cover Training and Employee Development Records. DoD-wide 
and OPM/Government-wide notices can be found at http://dpclo.defense.gov/privacy/SORNs/SORNs.html.

[FR Doc. 2013-05027 Filed 3-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
See34 Tex. Admin. C ode § 3.308(b) (1) ( 2009) (de fining “computer prog ram” ). 1 SeeTex. Tax Code Ann. § 151.0031 (West 2008) (de fining “computer prog ram” ). 2 

### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-08-00151- CV Ve r iz on N or th , I nc . , A ppe lla nt

v. Sus an Com bs, Com ptroller of P ubl ic Acc ounts of the State of T exas; and Gr eg Abbott, Attor ney Ge neral of the State of Texas , Appellees F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- GN-06- 0012 95, H ONO RAB LE JO HN K . DIETZ , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

C O N C U R

R I N G O P I N I O N Be cause Ver izon contends only that the computer softwar e progr am that it purcha sed do e s n ot f a ll w ith in t

he Com ptr oll e r’ s r e g ulator

y de fi n i t i o n o f “ c omp ute r p ro g ra

m” and not that such 1 pr og ra m fa lls outsi de the statut or y de fi nit ion

of that te rm , Iwould aff

irm the judg ment of the district 2 court. Althoug h section 151.021 of the tax code allows the Comptroller to adopt rules that c larify and implement the leg islation, such rules must be consistent with the plain lang uag e of the statute. See ge nerally Edgewood Inde p. Sch. Dist. v. Me no , 893 S.W .2d 450, 474 n.24 (Tex . 1995) (p ro mul g a te d r

ule s mu st b e c on sis te nt w ithstate c on sti tut ion and statut e s) ; Gerst v. Oak

Clif f Sav. & Loan Ass’n , 432 S.W .2d 702, 706 (Tex. 1968) (whe n exercising authority deleg ated by

leg islature,2

a g e nc y mus t a do pt ru le s con sis te nt wit h state c on sti tut ion and statut e s) . Ac c or din g ly , I de c lin e to a d o p tt h e m a

j o r i t y’ s an a l ys i s , an d

I c o n c u r i nt h e j u d g m e n to n l y.

__________________________________________ J an P. Patterson, J ustice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pember ton and Waldrop Filed: May

22, 2009
No. 09-8446.

#### Terry L. Dawkins, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 957, 130 S. Ct. 1552,

176 L. Ed. 2d 142,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1401.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 347 Fed. Appx. 182.
.RadToolTip_Default.rtLoading{background:url('WebResource.axd?d=ll2Mw9hd_3R9LZv-Bbg63Fta1JlpJM4cpl5b-T7iScwlkY8D8d6bAlLaoqCce8Y-rWoOSiKqfYjuq37cmMaqD4pnZjbb-1Hs3omVw70fgNMIbnTMKy38vTrtDfo1&t=638258152183838304') no-repeat center}.RadToolTip_Default .rtWrapper .rtWrapperTopLeft,.RadToolTip_Default .rtWrapper .rtWrapperTopRight,.RadToolTip_Default .rtWrapper .rtWrapperBottomLeft,.RadToolTip_Default .rtWrapper .rtWrapperBottomRight,.RadToolTip_Default .rtWrapper .rtWrapperTopCenter,.RadToolTip_Default .rtWrapper .rtWrapperBottomCenter,.RadToolTip_Default table.rtShadow .rtWrapperTopLeft,.RadToolTip_Default table.rtShadow .rtWrapperTopRight,.RadToolTip_Default table.rtShadow .rtWrapperBottomLeft,.RadToolTip_Default table.rtShadow .rtWrapperBottomRight,.RadToolTip_Default table.rtShadow .rtWrapperTopCenter,.RadToolTip_Default table.rtShadow .rtWrapperBottomCenter,.RadToolTip_Default .rtCloseButton{background-image:url('WebResource.axd?d=FMcut1qn97sGkVbW6mduhM5nlYEYgIsdeSh2vMptJiGeIKbwJvnhk_Zo0JQgO2FDb5V9O4C3Y2ks9idrthtcILYg484xDxAgIrscXDkDESsJQdSRB-tNjPkn48ty8xGBKtN9Sg2&t=638258152183838304')}.RadToolTip_Default .rtWrapper .rtWrapperLeftMiddle,.RadToolTip_Default .rtWrapper .rtWrapperRightMiddle,.RadToolTip_Default table.rtShadow .rtWrapperLeftMiddle,.RadToolTip_Default table.rtShadow .rtWrapperRightMiddle{background-image:url('WebResource.axd?d=yTmZJFyrKBE-PqovU6gD28TIndmi65FeLB_ymjmoGtqzAuC8pUj9h0Z0YQHoqrUAzTy461dZfUGe6222uJk2En4etfBuRYTBou_rugnfetDNhm6KhDgINVmAQLCtqqg73UKNI6rxO3drBoPk0&t=638258152183838304')}.RadToolTip_Default .rtWrapper .rtWrapperContent{background-color:#fff;color:#333}.RadToolTip_Default .rtTitlebar{color:#333}.RadToolTip_Default .rtCallout{background-image:url('WebResource.axd?d=lokbm08SifPsaSPYgQBjYTwxCXuzoqOeTSKOjS3jCMk_KnX-CtY07O0QBCNOBBp_CGmAcSkM17MbKMk8QInCblPhUvw2JKRvRrCfI-OtgMLsZfsjFxmjduTucNuUxNJIL36Kyw2&t=638258152183838304')}
Subsidiaries of Lindsay Corporation
 OwnershipPercentageLindsay Manufacturing, LLC  Nebraska
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay Structures, LLC  Nebraska
    
    
    100
    %Digitec, Inc.  Nebraska
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay Sales Holding Company, LLC  Nebraska
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay Sales & Service, LLC  Nebraska
    
    
    100
    %Irrigation Specialists, Inc.  Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay International Sales & Service, LLC  Nebraska
    
    
    100
    %Barrier Systems Sales & Service, LLC  Nebraska
    
    
    100
    %Watertronics, LLC  Wisconsin
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay Real Estate Holdings, LLC  Delaware
    
    
    100
    %IRZ Consulting, LLC  Oregon
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay Transportation, Inc.  Nebraska
    
    
    100
    %Barrier Systems, Inc.  California
    
    
    100
    %Safe Technologies, Inc.  California
    
    
    100
    %Barrier Systems, LLC  Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay International Holdings, BV  Netherlands
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay International, BV  Netherlands
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay Europe SAS  France
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay Manufacturing Africa (PTY) Ltd.  South Africa
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay America do Sul Ltda.  Brazil
    
    
    100
    %Snoline S.P.A.  Italy
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay (Tianjin) Industry Co., Ltd.  China
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay International (ANZ) Pty Ltd.  Australia
    
    
    100
    %Lindsay International Sales Corporation  Delaware (Inactive)
    
    
    100
    %
EXHIBIT 32.2


                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                       ANTHONY & SYLVAN POOLS CORPORATION
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350


I, William J. Evanson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Anthony & Sylvan Pools Corporation, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (2) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code), that:


     (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
          September 30, 2003 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement
          accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))
          and

     (3)  information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Anthony & Sylvan Pools Corporation


This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906 and is
not being filed as part of the Periodic Report.



Date: October 28, 2003                 /s/ William J. Evanson
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       William J. Evanson
                                       Executive Vice President and Chief
                                       Financial Officer


                                       19
No. 11-631.

#### Vernice Wessman, et al., Petitioners v. City of Mankato, Minnesota.

565 U.S. 1158, 132 S. Ct. 1107,

181 L. Ed. 2d 980,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 713.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4757 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4757

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a 
 permanent hold harmless provision for sole community hospitals under 
    the Medicare prospective payment system for covered outpatient 
                          department services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2006

Mrs. Jo Ann Davis of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 
   the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a 
 permanent hold harmless provision for sole community hospitals under 
    the Medicare prospective payment system for covered outpatient 
                          department services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT HOLD HARMLESS FOR SOLE COMMUNITY HOSPITALS UNDER 
              THE MEDICARE PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR HOSPITAL 
              OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1833(t)(7)(D) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1395l(t)(7)(D)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new clause:
                            ``(iii) Permanent hold harmless for sole 
                        community hospitals.--In the case of a sole 
                        community hospital (as defined in section 
                        1886(d)(5)(D)(iii)), for covered OPD services 
                        furnished after December 31, 2005, for which 
                        the PPS amount is less than the pre-BBA amount, 
                        the amount of payment under this subsection 
                        shall be increased by the amount of such 
                        difference.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to payment for OPD services furnished on and after 
January 1, 2006.
                                 <all>
```
No. 09-903.

#### Michael Shreffler, Petitioner v. Darryl L. Lewis.

559 U.S. 1008, 130 S. Ct. 1936,

176 L. Ed. 2d 366,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2585.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-*367tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 581 F.3d 467.
exv10w28






Exhibit 10.28




Severance-related acceleration of vesting




As of
February 2, 2011, certain award agreements for restricted stock of Piper
Jaffray Companies (the “Company”) have been amended to provide for accelerated vesting upon a
severance event if certain conditions are met. Included among the award amended were the following forms of agreement filed as exhibits to this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (i) form of restricted stock agreement for employee grants 2009 related to 2008 performance (Exhibit 10.7); (ii) restricted stock agreement for employee grants in 2010 related to 2009 performance (Exhibit 10.8); and (iii) restricted stock agreement for employee grants in 2011 related to 2010 performance (Exhibit 10.9).
The following is the text of the amendment:





“If the recipient’s employment by the Company or an affiliate is involuntarily terminated
as a result of a Company-determined severance event (i.e., an event specifically designated
as a severance event by the Company in a written notice to the recipient that he or she is
eligible for severance benefits under the Company’s Severance Plan, as may be amended from
time to time), then the unvested Currently Outstanding Awards will, as set forth in writing
in a severance agreement, vest in full upon the expiration of a thirty-day period
commencing upon the recipient’s execution of a general release of all claims against the
Company, on a form provided by the Company for this purpose and within the timeframe
designated by the Company; provided that, no such vesting will occur unless (i) the
recipient has not revoked the general release and it remains effective and enforceable upon
expiration of the thirty-day period following its execution, and (ii) the recipient has
complied with the terms and conditions of the Severance Plan and the applicable severance
agreement.”
No. 09-8547.

#### David Bochicchio, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 960, 130 S. Ct. 1561,

176 L. Ed. 2d 147,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1140.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 09-8763.

#### Fabian Fuentes-Valdiva, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 985, 130 S. Ct. 1722,

176 L. Ed. 2d 202,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1919.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 333 Fed. Appx. 889.
**Exhibit 10.(u)**

 

**JOINDER NUMBER 2005-1**

**TO**

**TAX SHARING AGREEMENT**

 

This Joinder Number 2005-1 to Tax Sharing Agreement, dated January 20, 2006, is entered into by and between ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (“ING USA”) and ING America Insurance Holdings, Inc. (“ING”), on its own behalf and on behalf of each of its subsidiaries that are currently parties to that certain Tax Sharing Agreement hereinafter described (the “Subsidiaries”).   

 

WHEREAS, ING and the Subsidiaries are members of an affiliated group, as that term is defined in Section 1504 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which expects to file a consolidated federal income tax return for each taxable year during which the Subsidiaries are includible corporations qualified to so file; 

 

WHEREAS, ING and the Subsidiaries entered into that certain Tax Sharing Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Agreement”) to provide for the manner of computation of the amounts and timing of payments with regard to the consolidated federal income tax return of the affiliated group for each taxable year;

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5 of the Agreement, subsidiaries of ING that were not immediately eligible to join the affiliated group as of the effective date of the Tax Sharing Agreement are subsequently allowed to join when they become eligible to join the affiliated group; and  

 

WHEREAS, ING USA has become an eligible subsidiary effective January 1, 2005 and in accordance with Section 5 of the Agreement is now eligible to join the affiliated group and become a party to the Agreement;    

 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as follows:

 

| 1. | In accordance with Section 5 of the Agreement, effective January 1, 2005 (the “Effective Time”), ING USA has joined in and become a party to the Agreement. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Notwithstanding paragraph 12 of the Agreement, with respect to ING USA, the Agreement: (i) shall be effective from and after the Effective Time; and (ii) shall apply to taxable year 2005 and to all subsequent periods unless and until amended or terminated, as provided in Section 10 of the Agreement. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 3. | Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Joinder Number 2005-1, from and after the Effective Time, ING USA shall be subject to all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

----
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Studio One Media, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth R.
Pinckard, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/   Kenneth
      R. Pinckard
              ------------------------------
              Kenneth
      R. Pinckard
              Principal
      Accounting Officer
              September
      29, 2008







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-KSB solely pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed
as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.