alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 487 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 487

To impose limitations on the authority of the Secretary of the Interior 
 to claim title or other rights to water absent specific direction of 
law or to abrogate, injure, or otherwise impair any right to the use of 
                         any quantity of water.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2005

  Mr. Pearce introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To impose limitations on the authority of the Secretary of the Interior 
 to claim title or other rights to water absent specific direction of 
law or to abrogate, injure, or otherwise impair any right to the use of 
                         any quantity of water.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND WATER RIGHTS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of the 
Interior shall not--
            (1) claim title or other rights to water in a State, other 
        than for Indian reservation lands, absent specific direction of 
        law; or
            (2) exercise authority so as to abrogate, injure or 
        otherwise impair any right to the use of any quantity of 
        water--
                    (A) that has been allocated--
                            (i) in conformance with subsections (a) 
                        through (c) of section 208 of the Department of 
                        Justice Appropriations Act, 1953 (43 U.S.C. 
                        666);
                            (ii) by or pursuant to interstate compact; 
                        and
                            (iii) by a decision of the United States 
                        Supreme Court;
                    (B) by requiring a change in the nature of use or 
                the transfer of any right to use water or creating a 
                limitation on the exercise of any right to use water; 
                or
                    (C) by modifying the delivery, diversion, 
                nondiversion, allocation, or storage of any water to be 
                delivered by contract.
                                 <all>
```
No. 09-9843.

#### Lydia Tsosie, Petitioner v. Arizona, et al.

559 U.S. 1101, 130 S. Ct. 2393,

176 L. Ed. 2d 783,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3654,

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One, denied.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Estelar Latinoamerica, C.A.: Form OST-4523 (Warsaw Waiver)
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5074 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 Union Calendar No. 325
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5074

                          [Report No. 109-569]

 To amend the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 to provide for continued 
   payment of railroad retirement annuities by the Department of the 
                   Treasury, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2006

Mr. Young of Alaska (for himself, Mr. Oberstar, Mr. LaTourette, and Ms. 
  Corrine Brown of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                             July 17, 2006

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
 To amend the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 to provide for continued 
   payment of railroad retirement annuities by the Department of the 
                   Treasury, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Railroad Retirement Technical 
Improvement Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. DISBURSEMENT AGENT.

    Section 7(b)(4) of the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 (45 U.S.C. 
231f(b)(4)) is amended so that subparagraph (A) reads as follows:
                    ``(A) The Secretary of the Treasury shall serve as 
                the disbursing agent for benefits payable under this 
                Act, under such rules and regulations as the Secretary 
                may in the Secretary's discretion prescribe.''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 325

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5074

                          [Report No. 109-569]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 to provide for continued 
   payment of railroad retirement annuities by the Department of the 
                   Treasury, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 17, 2006

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed`
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Mercari Communications Group, Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2002 as filedwith the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report).
I, Robert W. Marsik, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ Robert W. Marsik
Robert W. Marsik, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August
29, 2002
Exhibit 4.24


 


Loan Agreement, dated September 27, 2011,
between Bank Benleumi, First

 International Bank of Israel Ltd., as lender, and the Registrant, as borrower.


(English Summary of
Documents in Hebrew)


 


Date: September 27, 2011


Parties: Bank Benleumi, First
International Bank of Israel Ltd. (Lender)


AudioCodes Ltd. (Borrower)


 


Loan No. 1: 


Principal Amount: $3,375,000


Currency: U.S. Dollar


Interest Rate: LIBOR + 2.1% per year.


Maturity: September 27, 2017.


Principal Repayment: 24 equal quarterly payments.


Interest Repayment: Quarterly with repayment
of principal.


 


Loan No. 2: 


Principal Amount: $3,375,000


Currency: U.S. Dollar


Interest Rate: LIBOR + 3.1% per year.


Maturity: September 27, 2017.


Principal Repayment: 24 equal quarterly payments.


Interest Repayment: Quarterly with repayment
of principal.


 


Pledge


First ranking charge on all the Borrower's
rights and future incomes arising from its financial deposits at the Lender's bank accounts.


 


Covenants


Current covenants in other loan provided by
Lender to Borrower shall continue to exist, except for the following amendments:


 


Shareholders' equity:


		-	Not less than $ 40,000,000 and ratio of Shareholders' equity to the total balance sheet no less than
25%.



 


Cash and investments:


		-	Investments defined as long-term deposits up to 2 years and trading bonds with A or greate rating
maturing in less than 3 years.



		-	Following repayment of 2% Senior Convertible Notes Due 2024, accounts receivable and cash and investments
not less than $50,000,000; cash and investments not less than $30,000,000 and cash balance not less than $15,000,000.



 


Borrower not permitted to declare dividends,
pay management fees, interest or other payments to shareholders, or repay loans to shareholders until Borrower's liabilities to
Lender pursuant to the loans are repaid in full.


		-	The limitation does not prohibit dividends or repurchase of shares of up to $25,000,000.
Amendment to Morgan Stanley Supplemental Executive Retirement and Excess Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.19 
 AMENDMENT TO SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT 
 AND EXCESS PLAN

 Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated (the “Corporation”) hereby amends the Morgan Stanley Supplemental
Executive Retirement and Excess Plan (the “SEREP”) as follows: 
 1. Effective January 1, 2011, Section IV(C)(i),
SERP Offsets, shall be amended by inserting the following at the end of subparagraph (f) thereof: 
 “The value of
benefits provided for a year on or after January 1, 2011 under the Morgan Stanley 401(k) Plan and the Morgan Stanley 401(k) Savings Plan as Matching Contributions, Fixed Contributions and MS Transition Contributions for a year shall be
considered to be an offset to benefits provided under this Plan for such year, as provided in this Section IV(C)(i) of the Plan, only to the extent such value exceeds the value of the maximum amount of Matching Contributions available under the
Morgan Stanley 401(k) Plan on December 31, 2010 based on eligible pay for the year of determination.” 
 2. Effective
January 1, 2011, Section V(A), Calculation of Excess Benefits, shall be amended by inserting the following at the end thereof: 
 “Effective January 1, 2011, the amount of the Excess Benefit payable to a Participant under this Section V(A) shall be determined using the above formula as if benefits continued to accrue under
the Pension Plan as provided in this Section V(A), less any Excess Benefits Offset determined under Section V(B) of the Plan.” 
 3. Effective January 1, 2011, Section V, Excess Benefits, shall be amended by inserting new Section V(B), Excess Benefits Offsets, as follows: 

“B. Excess Benefits Offsets 
 “The benefit to which a Participant is entitled under Paragraph V(A), shall be reduced by the following (an ‘Excess Benefits Offset’): 

“(a) The value of benefits provided for a year on or after January 1, 2011 under the Morgan Stanley 401(k) Plan and the Morgan
Stanley 401(k) Savings Plan as Matching Contributions, Fixed Contributions and MS Transition Contributions for a year shall be considered to be an offset to benefits provided under this Plan for such year, as provided in this Section V(B) of the
Plan, only to the extent such value exceeds the value of the maximum amount of Matching Contributions available under the Morgan Stanley 401(k) Plan on December 31, 2010 based on eligible pay for the year of determination.” 

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Amendment to be
executed on its behalf as of this 23rd day of December,
2010. 
  

			
	MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/    KAREN JAMESLEY

	Title:	 	Global Head of Human Resources



  
 2
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Panda Ethanol, Inc. a Nevada corporation
      (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), Michael Trentel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies
      to
      the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Panda Ethanol, Inc., and will be retained by Panda Ethanol, Inc. and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







/s/ Michael
              TrentelMichael
                Trentel
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              November
                17, 2006
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-08-00038-CR

______________________________

ROBERT DALE REPPOND, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the 8th Judicial District Court

Hopkins County, Texas

Trial Court No. 0719090

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Robert Dale Reppond, appellant, has filed with this Court a motion to dismiss his appeal.

The motion is signed by Reppond and by his counsel in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). As authorized by Rule 42.2, we grant

the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: July 28, 2008

Date Decided: July 29, 2008

Do Not Publish
No. 09-9285.

#### Anthony Dean Slama, Petitioner v. California.

559 U.S. 1096, 130 S. Ct. 2380,

176 L. Ed. 2d 774,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3506.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District, denied.
No. 09-9447.

#### Antonio Feliciano, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1058, 130 S. Ct. 2359,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3000.

176 L. Ed. 2d 578,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice So-tomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
# C_2017333EN.01000701.xml

| 5.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 333/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 333/7

---

Special Report No 13/2017

‘A single European rail traffic management system: will the political choice ever become reality?’

(2017/C 333/05)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 13/2017 ‘A single European rail traffic management system: will the political choice ever become reality?’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
No. 09-9361.

#### Ronald Wayne Edmond, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

559 U.S. 1109, 130 S. Ct. 2408,

176 L. Ed. 2d 928,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3827.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Todd P. Headley, certify that:     1.      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Sourcefire, Inc.;     2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4.      The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a.      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     b.      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     c.      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5.      The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a.      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b.      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 3, 2007 By:  /s/ Todd P. Headley    Name:  Todd P. Headley    Title:  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Montana Fourth Judicial District Court. County of Missoula.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- SCOTT CARL ANDERSON, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-15-543

DECISION

On March 29, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to the Department of Corrections for five (5) years with no time suspended. Defendant received credit for time served in the amount of one hundred sixty-five (165) days at the rate of $100 credit per day toward Defendant’s fine. The Defendant was ordered to pay fines and fees totaling $680; the Public Defender fee was waived. The Court strongly recommended that Defendant be screened for the NEXUS program followed by pre-release.

On August 5, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant appeared by Vision Net from Dawson County Correctional Facility and was represented by Brent Getty of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

*62Done in open Court this 5th day of August, 2016.

DATED this 24th day of August, 2016.

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member and Hon. Brad Newman, Member.
CERTIFICATION

I, Chen Weisheng, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of China  Autoparts,
Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c)  presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 20, 2004


/s/ Chen Weisheng
------------------------
Chen Weisheng
CFO
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.
 Date: October 15, 2007
    
    /s/ Pamela G. BoonePamela G. BooneExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
# APPENDIX “ B6 ”

User Manual: DJI Phantom 3