alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5111]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (09-025)]


Government-Owned Inventions, Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of availability of inventions for licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Patent applications on the inventions listed below assigned to 
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in 
the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for 
licensing.

DATES: March 11, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda B. Blackburn, Patent Counsel, 
Langley Research Center, Mail Code 141, Hampton, VA 23681-2199; 
telephone (757) 864-3221; fax (757) 864-9190.

NASA Case No. LAR-17528-1: Robotic-Movement Payload Lifter and 
Manipulator;
NASA Case No. LAR-17593-1: Wireless Damage Location Sensing System;
NASA Case No. LAR-17044-1: Method of Generating X-Ray Diffraction Data 
for Integral Detection of Twin Defects in Super-Hetero-Epitaxial 
Materials;
NASA Case No. LAR-17185-1: Epitaxial Growth of Cubic Crystalline 
Semiconductor Alloys on Basal Plane of Trigonal or Hexagonal Crystal;
NASA Case No. LAR-17381-1: Thermoelectric Materials and Devices;
NASA Case No. LAR-17405-1: Hybrid Bandgap Engineering for Super-Hetero-
Epitaxial Semiconductor Materials, and Products Thereof;
NASA Case No. LAR-17553-1: Rhombohedral Cubic Semiconductor Materials 
on Trigonal Substrate with Single Crystal Properties and Devices Based 
on Such Materials;
NASA Case No. LAR-17554-1: X-ray Diffraction Wafer Mapping Method for 
Rhombohedral Super-Hetero-Epitaxy;
NASA Case No. LAR-17576-1: Wave Energy Transmission Apparatus for High-
Temperature Environments;
NASA Case No. LAR-17224-1: Aqueous Solution Dispersement of Carbon 
Nanotubes;
NASA Case No. LAR-17238-1: Carbon Nanotube Electrodes and Method for 
Fabricating Same for use in Biofuel Cell and Fuel Cell Applications:
NASA Case No. LAR-17608-1: Methodology for Predicting and Optimizing 
System Parameters for Electrospinning System;
NASA Case No. LAR-17634-1: Dual-Use Transducer for Use with a Boundary-
Stiffened Panel and Method of Using the Same.

    Dated: March 4, 2009.
Richard W. Sherman,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9-5111 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Initial Review Group, Biomedical Research Review Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         June 8-9, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Washington Plaza Hotel, 10 Thomas Circle NW., Washington, DC 20005.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Philippe Marmillot, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm. 2019, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-443-2861.                         *marmillotp@mail.nih.gov.*

                        (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol Research                               ( print page 10602)                            Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)                    

Dated: March 4, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-4990 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           15910
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   360363
<ALLOWANCES>                                    215743
<INVENTORY>                                      69364
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                375033
<PP&E>                                          394561
<DEPRECIATION>                                  233509
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  920841
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           610953
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     683411
<COMMON>                                          3612
<OTHER-SE>                                    (479721)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    920841
<SALES>                                         609392
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1019392
<CGS>                                           473147
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   473147
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                871258
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               92117
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (421659)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (421659)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6168

JOHN JOSEPH ZINKAND,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

CARLOS HERNANDEZ, Supt. of Avery Mitchell Correctional Institution, et al.,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, 

at Asheville. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (1:17-cv-00279-FDW)

Submitted: August 23, 2018 Decided: August 28, 2018

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Joseph Zinkand, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

John Joseph Zinkand seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as 

untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) 

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the 

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court 

denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Zinkand has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny 

Zinkand’s motion for appointment of counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
No. 09-8587.

#### Barron Wimbley, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 996, 130 S. Ct. 1746,

176 L. Ed. 2d 219,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2315.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 349 Fed. Appx. 54.
# C_2017234EN.01000101.xml

| 20.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8550 — USSL/Goldman Sachs/Redexis Gas)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 234/01)

On 13 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8550. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8550. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
August 4, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

EX PARTE VASTIE SHAKIRA COLEMAN, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00916-CR

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 44 (Monday, March 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4947]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Notice of Availability of Draft Guidance Regarding Which 
Children's Products Are Subject to the Requirements of CPSIA Section 
108; Correction

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Consumer Product Safety Commission published a document in 
the Federal Register of February 23, 2009, concerning a request for 
comments on a Notice of Availability of Draft Guidance Regarding Which 
Children's Products are Subject to the Requirements of CPSIA Section 
108. The document omitted a Web site link.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Stevenson, 301-504-6836.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of February 23, 2009, in FR Doc. E9-3808, 
on page 8060, in the third column, at the end of the sentence at 
paragraph O., correct the Web site link to read: Web site (http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/phthalatesop.pdf)

    Dated: March 3, 2009.
Todd Stevenson,
Director, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-4947 Filed 3-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
STATE v. Brittany Sue Opal BRYANT

117P19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2019

Anton M. Lebedev, Attorney at Law, for Bryant, Brittany Sue Opal.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Adam Everett, Assistant District Attorney, Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Davis Cooper.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of April 2019 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of April 2019."
No. 09-9087.

#### Charles Jason Benedict, Petitioner v. Texas.

559 U.S. 1075, 130 S. Ct. 2106,

176 L. Ed. 2d 735,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3373.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER**

**OF PACIFICENERGY MANAGEMENT LLC**

**PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. § 1350**

 

                Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 andin connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarterlyperiod ended March 31, 2005 that is being filed concurrently with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned officer of Pacific Energy Management LLC, general partner ofPacific Energy GP, LP which is the general partner of Pacific Energy Partners,L.P. and Subsidiaries (the “Partnership”) hereby certifies that:

 
| 1.     |   | The Report fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a or 15(d of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934; and                                 | )      |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                       |   |
| 2.     |   | The information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |   |

 
|   | /s/ Gerald A. Tywoniuk |
|--------|------------------------|
|   | Gerald A. Tywoniuk     |
|   | May 3, 2005            |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Pacific Energy Partners, L.P., and will be retained by PacificEnergy Partners, L.P., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
No. 09-661.

#### John C. Kasharian, Petitioner v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.

559 U.S. 1088, 130 S. Ct. 2142,

176 L. Ed. 2d 759,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3252.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 938, 130 S. Ct. 1570, 176 L. Ed. 2d 112, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 1338.
No. 11-7747.

#### Jerome Harold Hall, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1168, 132 S. Ct. 1120,

181 L. Ed. 2d 999,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 701.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 449 Fed. Appx. 617.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a) OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Kiran Patel, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this amendment to annual report on Form 10-K/A of Solectron
Corporation;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition
instructions contained in SEC Release 34-47986;(c)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred
during the period covered by the annual report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: April 14, 2005 /s/ Kiran Patel
Kiran Patel
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
No. 09-1174.

#### Joseph Lake, Petitioner v. Langdon D. Neal, et al.

560 U.S. 906, 130 S. Ct. 3296,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1187,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3942.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 585 F.3d 1059.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Mary Jane Robertson, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Crum &Forster Holdings Corp., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date:  October 28, 2005 By:  /s/    *Mary Jane Robertson*    Mary Jane Robertson    Executive Vice President,