alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1066
SHAHID AFZAAL MALIK, Petitioner,
versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-1562
SHAHID AFZAAL MALIK, Petitioner,
versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petitions for Review of Orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A93-279-949) Submitted: November 30, 2006 Decided: January 3, 2007 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.- 2 - Petitions dismissed in part; denied in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Shanta Ramson, RAMSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC, Burtonsville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Office of Immigration Litigation, Francesca U. Tamami, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Shahid Afzaal Malik, a native and citizen of Pakistan, seeks to challenge two decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board). In No. 06-1066, Malik challenges the Board’s order finding that the immigration judge did not err in denying his applications for a waiver of inadmissibility under § 212(I) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(I) (2000), and for adjustment of status. We lack jurisdiction to review any claim that the Board abused its discretion in affirming the denial of a § 212(I) waiver, Okpa v. INS , 266 F.3d 313, 317 (4th Cir. 2001), and the subsequent denial of adjustment of status. 8 U.S.C.A. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(I) (West 2005). Under 8 U.S.C.A. § 1252(a)(2)(D) (West 2005), we do have “a narrowly circumscribed jurisdiction to resolve constitutional claims or questions of law raised by aliens seeking discretionary relief.” Higuit v. Gonzales , 433 F.3d 417, 419 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 2973 (2006). However, we find no merit in Malik’s alleged deprivations of his constitutional rights. In No. 06-1562, Malik petitions for review of a decision of the Board denying his motion to reopen and reconsider the Board’s initial or der. To the extent Malik seeks review of the Board’s reconsideration of its discretionary denial of relief under § 1252(a)(2)(B)(I), we have no jurisdiction to review that denial “dressed up as a motion to reconsider.” Jean v. Gonzales , 435 F.3d- 4 - 475, 481 (4th Cir. 2006). As to the Board’s application of its general precedent and regulations concerning motions to reopen and reconsider, we hold that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Malik’s motion to reopen and reconsider. SeeINS v. Doherty , 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2006). Accordingly, we dismiss the petitions for review in part for lack of jurisdiction, and deny them in part. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITIONS DISMISSED IN PART; DENIED IN PART
# C_2017401EN.01001602.xml

| 25.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 401/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 401/16

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8637 — APG/Hines/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 401/03)

On 17 November 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8637. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8637. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2017230EN.01002301.xml

| 15.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/23

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8526 — CPPIB/BTPS/Milton Park)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 230/02)

On 7 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8526. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8526. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 1997; AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED
MAY 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                         477,675
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  265,120
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,000
<INVENTORY>                                    529,533
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,355,681
<PP&E>                                       1,236,035
<DEPRECIATION>                                 855,723
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,936,454
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          508,940
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           331
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,768,487
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,936,454
<SALES>                                      1,847,421
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,847,421
<CGS>                                        1,003,445
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,003,445
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,704,021
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             422,506
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,243,249)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,243,249)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,779,457
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,463,792)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-5847.

#### Dennis Flo re r, Petitioner v. Congregation Pidyon Shevuym, et al.

565 U.S. 1116, 132 S. Ct. 1000,

181 L. Ed. 2d 743,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 143.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 639 F.3d 916.
Search Help More Search Options Printable Version 

## Refrigerated Beverage Vending Machines ANOPR Technical Support Document This Technical Support Document provides the technical analyses and results in support of the information presented in the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANOPR) for beverage vending machines. Some of the following documents are available as Adobe Acrobat PDFs. Download Adobe Reader

. Title Page ( PDF 65 KB ) Acronyms and Abbreviations ( PDF 65 KB ) 

### Chapters Chapter 1: In troduction ( PDF 166 KB ) Chapter 2: Analytical Framework ( PDF 192 KB ) Chapter 3: Market and Technology Assessment ( PDF 295 KB ) Chapter 4: Screening Analysis ( PDF 138 KB ) Chapter 5: Engineering Analysis ( PDF 310 KB ) Updated July 2, EERE Information Center 

### Pa g e 1 of 3 A pp liances and Commercial E q ui p ment Standards: Refri g erated Bevera g e Vendin g Mach...

10/28/2008 http ://www1.eere.ener gy . g ov/buildin g s/a pp liance

_ standards/commercial/bevera g e

_ machi...2008 Chapter 6: Markups for Equipment Price Determination ( PDF 230 KB ) Chapter 7: Energy Use Characterization ( PDF 732 KB ) Chapter 8: Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis ( PDF 316 KB ) Chapter 9: Shipments Analysis ( PDF 250 KB ) Chapter 10: National Impact Analysis ( PDF 549 KB ) Chapter 11: Life-Cycle Cost Subgroup Analysis ( PDF 73 KB ) Chapter 12: Preliminary Manufacturer Impact Analysis ( PDF 166 KB ) Chapter 13: Utility Impact Analysis ( PDF 119 KB ) Chapter 14: Employment Impact Analysis ( PDF 88 KB ) 

### Reports Environmental Assessment for Proposed Energy Conservation Standards for Refrigerated Beverage Vending Machines ( PDF 107 KB ) Regulatory Impact Analysis for Refrigerated Beverage Vending Machines ( PDF 87 KB ) 

### Appendices Appendix A: Instructions for Using the Engineering Analysis Spreadsheet ( PDF 384 KB ) Appendix B: Engineering Data ( PDF 271 KB ) Updated July 2, 2008 Appendix C: Detailed Data for 

### Pa g e 2 of 3 A pp liances and Commercial E q ui p ment Standards: Refri g erated Bevera g e Vendin g Mach...

10/28/2008 http ://www1.eere.ener gy . g ov/buildin g s/a pp liance

_ standards/commercial/bevera g e

_ machi...Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov Content Last Updated: 07/08/2008 Equipment Price Markups ( PDF 110 KB ) Appendix D: Typical Meteorological Year (TMY2) Assignments ( PDF 507 KB ) Appendix E: User Instruction for Life-Cycle Cost Spreadsheet ( PDF 130 KB ) Appendix F: Detailed Life-Cycle Cost Output ( PDF 2.5 MB ) Appendix G: User Instructions for NES and NPV Spreadsheets ( PDF 126 KB ) Appendix H: Detailed National Energy Savings and National Net Present Value Output ( PDF 717 KB )

Printable Version 

### Pa g e 3 of 3 A pp liances and Commercial E q ui p ment Standards: Refri g erated Bevera g e Vendin g Mach...

10/28/2008 http ://www1.eere.ener gy . g ov/buildin g s/a pp liance

_ standards/commercial/bevera g e

_ machi...
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 44 (Monday, March 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10071]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4832]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending 
Nominations and Related Actions

    Nominations for the following properties being considered for 
listing or related actions in the National Register were received by 
the National Park Service before February 21, 2009. Pursuant to section 
60.13 of 36 CFR Part 60 written comments concerning the significance of 
these properties under the National Register criteria for evaluation 
may be forwarded by United States Postal Service, to the National 
Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St., NW., 
2280, Washington, DC 20240; by all other carriers, National Register of 
Historic Places, National Park Service,1201 Eye St., NW., 8th floor, 
Washington, DC 20005; or by fax, 202-371-6447. Written or faxed 
comments should be submitted by March 24, 2009.

J. Paul Loether,
Chief, National Register of Historic Places/National Historic Landmarks 
Program.

FLORIDA

Sarasota County

Armistead, William Martin, House, 1510 Hyde Park St., Sarasota, 
09000165

ILLINOIS

Cook County

IBM Building, 330 N. Wabash, Chicago, 09000166
Ramsey, Charles N., and Herry E. Weese House, 141 Kenilworth Ave., 
Kenilworth, 09000167

OHIO

Belmont County

Friends Boarding School and Ohio Yearly Meetinghouse Historic 
District, 61830 Sandy Ridge Rd., Barnesville, 09000168
Rock Hill Presbyterian Church, 56244 High Ridge Rd., Bellaire, 
09000169

Hamilton County

Cheviot Fieldhouse, 3729 Robb Ave., Cheviot, 09000170

Knox County

Loveridge, Richard and Ann, House, 12526 Lower Green Valley Rd., 
Mount Vernon, 09000171

Stark County

Town Pump of East Sparta, The, Jct. of Walnut St. and Main Ave., 
East Sparta, 09000172

VIRGINIA

Pittsylvania County

Yeatts, John and Nancy, House, VA 795, Chatham, 09000173

    Request for REMOVAL has been made for the following resources:

NORTH DAKOTA

Sheridan County

Winter House, NE Sheridan County, Goodrich, 79001775

PENNSYLVANIA

Philadelphia County

Stokely, William J., School, 1844-1860 N. 32nd St., Philadelphia, 
86003336

[FR Doc. E9-4832 Filed 3-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Petitioner

 v.

JAMES ARTHUR BALL, III.,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 719 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of March, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) Given the extensive impact the Superior Court’s published opinion could

have on the lower courts and prosecution offices in situations where a

defendant initiates a statutory summary appeal from a Magisterial District

Judge’s sua sponte finding of guilt on an uncharged, lesser-included

offense, should this Honorable Court grant review because the purpose

for double jeopardy protections are not implicated, or implicated minimally,

when the defendant appeals his conviction for a trial de novo?

(2) Should this Honorable Court exercise its supervisory authority over the

Superior Court’s erroneous discharge of defendant and remand his case

for sentencing on the lesser-included offense he appeals and necessarily

was found guilty of committing?
No. 09-746.

#### Beverly Enterprises-Illinois, Inc., dba VIP Manor, Petitioner v. Virginia Mitchell, Executor of the Estate of Charles A. Mitchell, Deceased.

559 U.S. 972, 130 S. Ct. 1698,

176 L. Ed. 2d 182,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2108.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 385 Ill. App. 3d 1151, 361 Ill. Dec. 138, 970 N.E.2d 138.
No. 09-8472.

#### Lloyd T. Stephens, Petitioner v. Fourth Judicial District Court, et al.

559 U.S. 1050, 130 S. Ct. 2344,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3005.

176 L. Ed. 2d 564,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 351 Fed. Appx. 861.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC Form
10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          88,930
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  232,072<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F2>
<PP&E>                                      12,156,802
<DEPRECIATION>                                 815,229
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,396,641
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F2>
<BONDS>                                      8,262,734
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    865,587
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,787,768
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,396,641<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               445,352
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  246,904
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,830
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             138,570
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 68,550
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             68,550
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,774)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    46,160
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are stated net of allowances.
<F2>This Registrant does not report using a classified balance sheet.
<F3>Includes limited partners' interest in the SPG Operating Partnership of
$1,018,120.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2











Certification of Chief Financial Officer of ULURU Inc.


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant


to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of ULURU Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of ULURU Inc. does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1.)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2.)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.











Date: May 14, 2010

/s/ Terrance K. WallbergTerrance K. WallbergVice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
PROPPANT_TYPE PROPPANT

BUXT BAUXITE CER CERAMIC GRVL GRAVEL PERF PERFORATIONS IN OPENHOLE RCCR RC CERAMIC (RESIN COATED) RCSD RC SAND (RESIN COATED) SAND SAND U UNKNOWN WLNTWALNUT HULLS MRBL *

*not defined in the original source of data (IHS Energy, 2011, Petroleum Information Data Model (PIDM) 2.5 data management system: IHS, Inc. [Available from IHS, 15 Inverness Way East, Englewood, CO 80112.])*not defined in the original source of data (IHS Energy, 2011, Petroleum Information Data Model (PIDM) 2.5 data management system: IHS, Inc. [Available from IHS, 15 Inverness Way East, Englewood, CO 80112.])*not defined in the original source of data (IHS Energy, 2011, Petroleum Information Data Model (PIDM) 2.5 data management system: IHS, Inc. [Available from IHS, 15 Inverness Way East, Englewood, CO 80112.])
No. 09-9130.

#### Adam J. Torres-Ojeda, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1022, 130 S. Ct. 1925,

176 L. Ed. 2d 393,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2493.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-*394tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
No. 09-9666.

#### Emerson O. Davis, aka John Calvin, aka Stanford Robinson, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1083, 130 S. Ct. 2129,

176 L. Ed. 2d 750,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3142.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 587 F.3d 1300.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Mercari Communications Group, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Scott Mathis, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Scott MathisScott MathisChief Executive OfficerDate:  August 30, 2010








This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.