alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4984]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Consumer Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    The Consumer Advisory Council will meet on Thursday, March 26, 
2009. The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will take 
place at the Federal Reserve Board's offices in Washington, DC, in 
Dining Room E on the Terrace Level of the Martin Building. Anyone 
planning to attend the meeting should, for security purposes, register 
no later than Tuesday, March 24, by completing the form found online 
at: https://www.federalreserve.gov/secure/forms/cacregistration.cfm.
    Additionally, attendees must present photo identification to enter 
the building.
    The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and is expected to conclude at 1 
p.m. The Martin Building is located on C Street, NW., between 20th and 
21st Streets.
    The Council's function is to advise the Board on the exercise of 
the Board's responsibilities under various consumer financial services 
laws and on other matters on which the Board seeks its advice. Time 
permitting, the Council will discuss the following topics:
    <bullet> Foreclosures
    Members will discuss various issues related to foreclosures and 
efforts to prevent them, including the Making Home Affordable program.
    <bullet> Neighborhood and Community Stabilization
    Members will discuss strategies and challenges in the effort to 
stabilize communities affected by foreclosures, including the 
implementation of the Neighborhood Stabilization Program.
    <bullet> Access to Credit
    Members will discuss various issues related to the current 
availability of credit to consumers and small businesses.
    <bullet> Proposed Rules Regarding Overdraft Services
    Members will discuss the proposed amendments to Regulation E, which 
would provide consumers with certain choices relating to the use of 
overdraft services and the assessment of overdraft fees.
    Reports by committees and other matters initiated by Council 
members also may be discussed.
    Persons wishing to submit views to the Council on any of the above 
topics may do so by sending written statements to Jennifer Kerslake, 
Secretary of the Consumer Advisory Council, Division of Consumer and 
Community Affairs, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 
Washington, DC 20551. Information about this meeting may be obtained 
from Ms. Kerslake, 202-452-6470.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 5, 2009.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
 [FR Doc. E9-4984 Filed 3-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AFV Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Carlos Zalduondo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Carlos Zalduondo |
|--------|----------------------|

|   | Carlos Zalduondo |
|--------|------------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|

|   | February 12, 2008 |
|--------|-------------------|
No. 09-9649.

#### Michael McNeill, Petitioner v. Officer Ashley, et al.

560 U.S. 911, 130 S. Ct. 3289,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1195,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4067.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
STATE of North Carolina v. Craig Deonte HAIRSTON

No. 411P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Marilyn G. Ozer, Attorney at Law, for Hairston, Craig Deonte.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th of November 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6480] 

                    The MEK filed a petition for revocation of its designation as a foreign terrorist organization (the “Petition”). Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this matter, including the Petition and associated filings by the MEK, pursuant to Section 219(a)(4)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(B)) (“INA”), and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I conclude that the circumstances that were the basis for the 2003 re-designation of the aforementioned organization as a                           ( print page 1274)                        foreign terrorist organization have not changed in such a manner as to warrant revocation of the designation and that the national security of the United States does not warrant a revocation.                 

Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the aforementioned organization as a foreign terrorist organization, pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be maintained. 

                    This determination shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

Dated: January 7, 2009. 

Condoleezza Rice, 

Secretary of State,  Department of State.

 [FR Doc. E9-474 Filed 1-9-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
No. 09-8212.

#### Barry Reese, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 951, 130 S. Ct. 1537,

176 L. Ed. 2d 133,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1362,

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 329 Fed. Appx. 324.
No. 11-544.

#### Vern McKinley, Petitioner v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

565 U.S. 1113, 132 S. Ct. 1026,

181 L. Ed. 2d 738,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 147.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 396 U.S. App. D.C. 216, 647 F.3d 331.
Fourth Amendment to the Supplemental 401(k) Retirement Plan



 Exhibit 10.66 
 AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE 
 PATRIOT COAL CORPORATION 

SUPPLEMENTAL 401(k) RETIREMENT PLAN 
 WHEREAS, Patriot Coal Corporation (“Company”) previously adopted the Patriot Coal Corporation Supplemental 401(k) Retirement Plan (“Plan”); and 

WHEREAS, the Company reserved the right to amend the Plan, by a resolution adopted by action of the Board of Directors of the Company,
pursuant to Section 12.1 thereof; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company has determined that it is necessary and desirable to amend
the Plan to provide for matching credits thereunder; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, effective as the dates set forth herein, the Company
amends the Plan as follows: 
 1. Effective January 1, 2010, Section 4.2 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with
the following: 
 4.2 Employer Matching Credits. 

The Employer will credit to the Plan an amount equal to 100% of the first 3% of his or her Compensation that the
Participant elects to have deferred and credited to the Plan under Section 4.1. 
 2. Effective April 1, 2010 with
respect to deferrals under Section 4.1 attributable to Compensation (as defined in Section 2.6) payable on or after such date, Section 4.2 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

4.2 Employer Matching Credits. 
 The Employer will credit to the Plan an amount equal to 100% of the first 6% of his or her Compensation that the Participant elects to have deferred and credited to the Plan under Section 4.1.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment is hereby executed as of this 1st day of March, 2010. 

 

			
	PATRIOT COAL CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Joseph W. Bean

		 	Joseph W. Bean
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7307

FLETCHER J. MITCHELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE, for the City of

Virginia Beach; BEN PAVEK, III, Esquire,

Senior Assistant Public Defender,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-04-378-2)

Submitted: January 27, 2005 Decided: February 2, 2005

Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fletcher J. Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Fletcher J. Mitchell appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny Mitchell’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Mitchell v. Public

Defender’s Office, No. CA-04-378-2 (E.D. Va. June 29, 2004). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 02364

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

02364\02364 _Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 02364\02364_Checklist.xlsx EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

02364\02364_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 02364\02364_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02364\02364_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02364\02364_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02364\02364_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02364\02364_PartH.XLS Plant submitted survey file

02364\Certification statement_02364.pdf Plant certification statement

x 02364\Supporting Documentation\02364_MAP-1 James De Young ID# 02364.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02364\Supporting Documentation\02364_MAP-2 James De Young ID# 02364.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02364\Supporting Documentation\Water Balance Diagram WB-1 ID# 02364.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database .
No. 09-8139.

#### Bruce Monroe Greer, Petitioner v. Cynthia Nelson, Warden.

559 U.S. 1102, 130 S. Ct. 2399,

176 L. Ed. 2d 787,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3576.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 975, 130 S. Ct. 1693, 176 L. Ed. 2d 187, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 2076.
No. 09-594.

#### Jose Erasmo De la Rosa, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

560 U.S. 903, 130 S. Ct. 3272,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1182,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3893.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 579 F.3d 1327.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The Board of Directors
Solectron Corporation:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-69443, 333-46304, 333-46300, 333-40176, 333-34494, 333-92269,
333-75865, 333-85949, 333-89035, 333-75813, 333-24293, 333-02523, 333-17643,
333-56220, 333-56464, 333-60684, 333-64454, 333-69182, 333-73238, 333-74946,
333-84066, 333-96823, 033-58580, 333-46686, 033-57575, 033-75270, 033-33461,
033-58210, 333-83297, 333-02945, 333-15983, 333-49206, 333-84070, 333-102534,
333-102535, 333-107127 and 333-114447) on Forms S-3, S-4, and S-8 of Solectron
Corporation of our report dated October 18, 2004, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Solectron Corporation and subsidiaries as of
August 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended August 31, 2004, and the related financial
statement schedule, which report appears in the August 31, 2004 annual report on
Form 10-K of Solectron Corporation.

Our report, dated October 18, 2004, contains an explanatory paragraph stating
that effective as of September 1, 2001, the Company adopted the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets."


/s/ KPMG LLP

Mountain View, California
November 3, 2004
No. 09-10092.

#### Joseph Eugene Howard, Petitioner v. David Ballard, Warden.

560 U.S. 915, 130 S. Ct. 3301,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1203,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3923.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 361 Fed. Appx. 460.
No. 09-9024.

#### Arthur Longoria, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1020, 130 S. Ct. 1918,

176 L. Ed. 2d 389,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2377.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 352 Fed. Appx. 968.
No. 09-9715.

#### William Darby, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1087, 130 S. Ct. 2132,

176 L. Ed. 2d 757,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3223.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 09M96.

#### Bahig F. Bishay, Petitioner v. Mechanics Cooperative Bank.

560 U.S. 902, 130 S. Ct. 3311,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1180,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3902.

May 17, 2010.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
No. 09-9879.

#### Timothy Truong, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1101, 130 S. Ct. 2395,

176 L. Ed. 2d 784,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3490.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 587 F.3d 1049.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

252 . 
80 eonour ln 

to tlw pemonoa~ oohoo 

onr opinion that tha 06unt~ lo liable 

I turd for the lorr l ruklned on thee* 

boadoi ma Uaabk portloa OS ha-t. 0, 600. 6 0-C thr aonl tltutAo n 1 8 -!i e ea r M dítlno a b lguo uo T. o q.uote fr o m th lo l wtion the follmlng1 %aid lodo, and the rooeedo therwr, 

uhon #old, olmll bo h.Ld @f l aU ooontloo 8 f one l o a truot 

for t&o benef'it of publio oohoelo thorebt oald procwdo to 

ba lav*o;kd in bola of the unltrd Meter, tho state of TJuo 

or oountler ln oaf6 otate, OF in rush otboc ooovrltieo, and 

undel uoh r reotrletleno ao my be preootlbd by 1-j acrd the 

oomtieo owl be n~ponoiple for til lnroOtnsntr.a 

Artlola W, Revlrad Cipil Statuko of Texao, reodo 

a0 follouo: 

%o h wtmt 

gnntml to it T 

nr rl J *ll or dl6pore or 8x4 len&I 

or eduoation& 

yo~o;a~ bo prooldad b 

oi --tiJ# Md proorrda of any 
bona or lnwrparnted oltlu M4 LtAo, and 

euohoouatyalowuatrtu*fortho 

~POO l aheolo therein, only 

r r m\a r llp . 

to w we4 nn4 l p o n4 d 

. 

The 0 la en in the c ue or o o uua ocount he 

( r . 0ur k 8, et l ! ., IbS 8a T.. am; OLted by youa 

, l t nl., 

ok g 08 t& 

lar In the felloubg l.nngwgoa 

‘(6) deotioa 6, A& 7,’ & the oonotitt+ 

tion, 00 iu u rpprpoabk, ymvi6wt 'Axa 

lnnd.8 &rutotoro or herenfta gmnbd to the 

o evir oountiao nl o f th io l ta$o for l duo ntlo a - 

el purpooe0, are of r-S the pmport7 of raid 

wUdleOr rUp8tlW,Jo w Uhioh %hey mire 

-to& ~4 tltlo thooeto lo vooted ia oai4 

eount1ro 

tlo no h Jl 

uk nd o l 4 ler opooo e eo o or foun a itnever ba l vallbbk rg*lnot tb title 

aaid wuntko alalu u a truot r0r tu benefLt 

0rpubu0 00h0a0 t;brrdttj 0adp~0000bt0 b0 

lnvooted la bon40 ei* the vialted 8tak0, t2m 

Uta k o f To xu, er oountleo in o nld l tnto, or 

in r ueoh fbrr o wwltl.enno d o a b ol , wh rmstrletzzxKz 

@ er a 0kq 4 lnltn# a d tho l ounty 

b aa 

lahrrot 

ia @ nil inYootmMto; th o 

ta o no nd o th+rr eTo a oue x l$op wn t 

p r ~lml, o h ll k l vnllnb ll~ a d.9 

o f thio l ootLon o f ua o Conotltutlon a & b 

y g llg 

ernirO0t,, it m t0 W) th0t tb0 ror30mt20w 
oourt of tie oount7, in maIcing an Lnvo8tam-h 

of the proooedo %horoln opoolfled, uust sot 

ln a judiohl or Quo.01 Ju4udal oapoitf. The 

wunty for uh+h that 8ot l&do tho pro6wdo 

u ui TWO t&l&* mid tbo inrootabrrt thereof lntha l oourlt&o rmmIiIl tha GanAUtutlan 

or oUmrul80~ u Iry be pr&arlbed by law, IWOeoou 

dfaora 3 

lxvolno aa uweloo of +&pwat ala 

ona T&mooutatleo @loo, br the l 

temo o f the Oowtltutlon, uo bupowlb Tztr . 

all lnvortaonta.' Am rllogod, aad ao ohomn in 

the oourt~0 fladingr, t!aa &oolonero~ wurt 

SrantLu totlxm approprirtvdto fiba genonl 

~00.0r 000mdw CO-to l p00iti0d 0~ 0r th0 

II. hare boon unable to find 

Yn 

caSO8 holdlrq: to the 

oontr 

"i 

en4 theroforo~advloo you that our opinoon Reyua 

c o unty l li8bla to the pe zmmoat l ohool fund of the county for 

tbo loro l uoWn.6 by tint fund on the City of E8otland bonda. 

Amdrtant 

QPb0
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       5,269,173
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          47,286
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             9,550,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 25,053,659
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,660,034
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,689,811
<LOANS>                                     85,248,271
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,704,318
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             131,467,822
<DEPOSITS>                                 119,033,877
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,702,535
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,369,012
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              10,731,410
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              8,945,541
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,294,263
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               357,291
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            10,597,095
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,233,848
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,254,091
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,343,004
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  620,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              (8,316)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,809,015
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,463,787
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,567,580
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,567,580
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.08
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.66
<LOANS-NON>                                    509,038
<LOANS-PAST>                                    95,305
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,214,173
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  414,590
<RECOVERIES>                                   129,855
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,704,318
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,704,318
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
No. 11-5397.

#### John Renard Harris, Petitioner v. Stephen Upton, Warden.

565 U.S. 1102, 132 S. Ct. 870,

181 L. Ed. 2d 567,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 9005.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 905, 132 S. Ct. 305, 181 L. Ed. 2d 187, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5521.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**











**Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer of ULURU Inc.**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant**


**to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ULURU Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the
“Report”), the undersigned officer of ULURU INC. does hereby certify, pursuant
      to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
      (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1.)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2.)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.











Date:
                May 15, 2007
            
            /s/
                Terrance K. WallbergTerrance
                K. WallbergVice
                President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)