alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4857 

To better inform consumers regarding costs associated with compliance for 

protecting endangered and threatened species under the Endangered 

Species Act of 1973. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2006 

Miss MCMORRIS (for herself, Mr. DICKS, Mr. OTTER, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. 

HASTINGS of Washington, and Mr. WALDEN of Oregon) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To better inform consumers regarding costs associated with 

compliance for protecting endangered and threatened 

species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Endangered Species 

5 Compliance and Transparency Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT COMPLIANCE ESTI7 MATION AND REPORTING. 

8 (a) CUSTOMER INFORMATION.—To better inform 

9 consumers regarding costs associated with compliance for 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4857 IH 

1 protecting endangered and threatened species under the 

2 Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), 

3 the Administrators of the Bonneville Power Administra4 tion, the Western Area Power Administration, the South5 western Power Administration, and the Southeastern 

6 Power Administration shall each include in monthly bil7 lings sent to each firm’s power customer information esti8 mating and reporting the costs of each customer’s share 

9 of the direct and indirect costs incurred by each adminis10 tration related to compliance with the Endangered Species 

11 Act and activities related to such Act. 

12 (b) DIRECT COSTS.—Direct costs shall include Fed13 eral agency obligations related to study-related costs, cap14 ital, operation, maintenance, and replacement costs, and 

15 staffing costs. 

16 (c) INDIRECT COSTS.—Indirect costs shall include 

17 foregone generation and replacement power costs, includ18 ing the net costs of any transmission. 

19 (d) COORDINATION.—The Bureau of Reclamation 

20 and any other affected Federal agencies shall assist the 

21 Administrators with the identification of the costs. 

22 SEC. 3. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT COMPLIANCE REPORT. 

23 No later than January 30 of each year, each Admin24 istrator, in coordination with the Bureau of Reclamation 

25 and other affected Federal agencies, shall provide an anVerDate Aug 31 2005 06:47 Mar 06, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4857.IH H4857

ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4857 IH 

1 nual report to the Committee on Resources of the House 

2 of Representatives and the Committee on Environment 

3 and Public Works of the Senate estimating direct and in4 direct costs associated with compliance with the Endan5 gered Species Act of 1973 on a project-by-project basis 

6 for the Western Area Power Administration and on a sys7 tem-wide basis for each of the other power marketing ad8 ministrations. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2493-084-WA]

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47879), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for an amendment of license for the Snoqualmie Falls Hydroelectric Project, located on the Snoqualmie River in the City of Snoqualmie, King County, Washington, and has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) on the proposed amendment.

                    A copy of the EA is on file with the Commission and is available for public inspection. The EA may also be viewed on the Commission's Web site at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*                     using the “eLibrary” link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*                     or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.                

Any comments should be filed within 30 days from the issuance date of this notice, and should be addressed to the Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Room 1-A, Washington, DC 20426. Please reference the project name and project number (Snoqualmie Falls Hydroelectric Project No. 2493-084) on all comments. Comments may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site under the “eFiling” link. For further information, contact Linda Stewart at (202) 502-6680.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E9-4724 Filed 3-4-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document









































 
 

  Exhibit 10.29    
    


 Summary of Unwritten Compensation Arrangements

Applicable to Non-Employee Directors of Overstock.com, Inc.  


        The Company pays its non-employee directors $60,000 annually, at the rate of $15,000 per quarter. The Company also grants
restricted stock units to directors, generally at the first Board meeting after the director first joins the Board, and periodically thereafter. In 2010, the Company granted restricted stock units to
non-employee directors as follows: 

 






 



							
	Name



 
	 	Grant Date 	 	Number of

Restricted Stock Units

Granted(1) 	 
	 Allison H. Abraham
	 	 May 11, 2010	 	 	 10,000	 
	 Barclay F. Corbus
	 	 May 11, 2010	 	 	 10,000	 
	 Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr. 
	 	 May 11, 2010	 	 	 10,000	 
	 John J. Byrne
	 	 May 11, 2010	 	 	 10,000	 
	 Samuel A. Mitchell
	 	 October 26, 2010	 	 	 10,000	 




 


 




	(1)
	Each
restricted stock unit represents a contingent right to receive one share of Overstock.com, Inc. common stock. The restricted stock units vest as to 25%
at the close of business on the first anniversary of the date of grant, 25% at the second anniversary of the date of grant, and the remaining 50% at the third anniversary of the date of grant. Vested
shares are delivered promptly after the restricted stock units vest. 


 

         The
Company also reimburses directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending Board and committee meetings. Haverford Valley, L.C., an
affiliate of the Company, and certain affiliated entities which make travel arrangements for the Company's executives, also occasionally make travel arrangements for directors to attend Board
meetings, for which the Company reimburses Haverford Valley at rates not in excess of commercially available airline rates. 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.29
UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

The Intelligence Community commits to the design, development, and use of AI with the following principles:

Respect the Law and Act with Integrity. We will employ AI in a manner that respects human dignity, 

rights, and freedoms. Our use of AI will fully comply with applicable legal authorities and with policies 

and procedures that protect privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties.

Transparent and Accountable. We will provide appropriate transparency to the public and our customers 

regarding our AI methods, applications, and uses within the bounds of security, technology, and 

releasability by law and policy, and consistent with the Principles of Intelligence Transparency for the 

IC. We will develop and employ mechanisms to identify responsibilities and provide accountability for 

the use of AI and its outcomes.

Objective and Equitable. Consistent with our commitment to providing objective intelligence, we will 

take affirmative steps to identify and mitigate bias.

Human-Centered Development and Use. We will develop and use AI to augment our national security 

and enhance our trusted partnerships by tempering technological guidance with the application of 

human judgment, especially when an action has the potential to deprive individuals of constitutional 

rights or interfere with their free exercise of civil liberties.

Secure and Resilient. We will develop and employ best practices for maximizing reliability, security, 

and accuracy of AI design, development, and use. We will employ security best practices to build 

resilience and minimize potential for adversarial influence.

Informed by Science and Technology. We will apply rigor in our development and use of AI by 

actively engaging both across the IC and with the broader scientific and technology communities to 

utilize advances in research and best practices from the public and private sector.

Principles of 

Artificial Intelligence Ethics for the

Intelligence Community

The Principles of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Ethics for the Intelligence Community (IC) are intended to guide 

personnel on whether and how to develop and use AI, to include machine learning, in furtherance of the IC’s 

mission. These Principles supplement the Principles of Professional Ethics for the IC and do not modify or 

supersede applicable laws, executive orders, or policies. Instead, they articulate the general norms that IC 

elements should follow in applying those authorities and requirements. To assist with the implementation 

of these Principles, the IC has also created an AI Ethics Framework to guide personnel who are determining 

whether and how to procure, design, build, use, protect, consume, and manage AI and other advanced analytics.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Joning Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending November 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, John Jones, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


October 11, 2004


/s/  John Jones
-----------------------------
     John Jones,
     Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, January 15, 2009 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, January 15, 2009 will be:

formal orders of investigation; institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature; and

other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: January 8, 2009.

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-462 Filed 1-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

   Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of West Bancorporation, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas R. Gulling,
Chief Financial Officer of West Bancorporation, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that: (1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; (2) the information
contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
conditions and results of operations of West Bancorporation, Inc.

August 4, 2005

/s/ Douglas R. Gulling
------------------------
Douglas R. Gulling
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

                                       26
EXHIBIT 24(a)**POWER OF ATTORNEY**     The undersigned, being a director of Lindsay Manufacturing Co. (the “Company”), herebyappoints Richard W. Parod as his agent and attorney-in-fact for the purpose of executing and filingall reports on Form 10-K relating to the year ending August 31, 2006, and any amendments thereto,required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the Company.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney as of the dateindicated.     **Signature** **Capacity** **Date**     /s/ Michael N. Christodolou Chairman of the Board
No. 09-9457.

#### Maurice Jones, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1056, 130 S. Ct. 2360,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3015.

176 L. Ed. 2d 575,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
No. 09-1094.

#### Charles Melvin Campbell, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1070, 130 S. Ct. 2115,

176 L. Ed. 2d 726,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3338.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET AT DECEMBER  31, 1997 AND THE RELATED  CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS  AND OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
OF STRATFORD  AMERICAN  CORPORATION AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                             168,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      891,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       180,000
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,060,000
<PP&E>                                             683,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                     307,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,554,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,059,000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           881,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      (2,683,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,554,000
<SALES>                                             17,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,060,000
<CGS>                                                3,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,704,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   974,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 581,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,199,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,199,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,199,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.01)


</TABLE>
Provisional 11/16

NSN: 

*************************

*MONOGRAPH NO: 

M7JP

*************************

(TPNS)

Item:

Beverage bases (Powdered), Sweetened with nutritive sweetener, Tropical punch, 

Fortified with ascorbic acid and enhanced with maltodextrin, (Type II, Flavor 10, 

Formulation e)

Document: CID A-A-20098, Beverage Bases (Powdered) and PKG&QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 130 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Dehydrated product: Uniformly blended, free flowing, and a homogenous dry mixture 

free of hard lumps. Granulation may vary from a fine powder to small agglomerated 

crystals.

Rehydrated product: Light red, sediment free, clear to slightly cloudy.

Odor: Rehydrated product: Tropical fruit blend.

Flavor: Rehydrated product: Tropical fruit blend.

Texture: Dehydrated product: Free of hard lumps.

Rehydrated product: Fully dissolve within two minutes with constant stirring.

Possible Deteriorative Changes

Appearance: Rehydrated: Coagulated, jelled, surface frothing, or cloudiness, excessive sediment 

significantly affecting aesthetic appearance or flavor.

Odor: Burnt, scorched, moldy/mildew.

Flavor: Oxidized or any other flavor not typical of the type of beverage.

Texture: Lumpy or caked, not free flowing.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Prepare beverage IAW package instructions. Product should dissolve completely within about two 

minutes.

Special Notes
Provisional 11/16

NSN: 

*************************

*MONOGRAPH NO: 

M7JP

*************************

(TPNS)

If slight sedimentation and clouding are observed but the odor and flavor are normal, do not score the 

sedimentation as a defect during surveillance inspection; make note of it in the narrative for future use. 

Coagulation/gelation may occur if the original formulation was incorrect or if the product has been 

temperature abused for a long time. Coagulation / gelation results in clumps of granules that do not 

readily dissolve when product is reconstituted. Particles tend to float in suspension (look like gel pockets 

or tapioca granules that are clumped together).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-65,359] 

                    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 24, 2009, in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers at                     *The Modesto Bee,*                     Ad Production Group, Modesto, California.                 

The petitioning group of workers is covered by an active certification (TA-W-64,860) which expires on February 11, 2011. 

Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of February 2009. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-4541 Filed 3-3-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
No. 09-9527.

#### Buony Roum, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1079, 130 S. Ct. 2117,

176 L. Ed. 2d 743,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3357.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 985 A.2d 463.