alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017271EN.01000101.xml

| 17.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8551 — Advent International/Faerch Plast Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 271/01)

On 2 August 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8551. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8551. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2016213DE.01000601.xml

| 14.6.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 213/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 213/6

---

Berichtigung für Eine neue Regelung für das Vereinigte Königreich innerhalb der Europäischen Union

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 69 I vom 23. Februar 2016
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 69 I vom 23. Februar 2016

(2016/C 213/02)

Seite 8, Abschnitt D „Sozialleistungen und Freizügigkeit“, „Änderung des Sekundärrechts der EU“, Nummer 2, einleitende Worte:

Anstatt:

Anstatt:

| „2. | Nach Inkrafttreten dieses Beschlusses wird die Kommission Vorschläge zur Änderung des bestehenden Sekundärrechts der EU vorlegen, und zwar“ |
| --- | --- |

„2.

Nach Inkrafttreten dieses Beschlusses wird die Kommission Vorschläge zur Änderung des bestehenden Sekundärrechts der EU vorlegen, und zwar“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

| „2. | Nach Wirksamwerden dieses Beschlusses wird die Kommission Vorschläge zur Änderung des bestehenden Sekundärrechts der EU vorlegen, und zwar“. |
| --- | --- |

„2.

Nach Wirksamwerden dieses Beschlusses wird die Kommission Vorschläge zur Änderung des bestehenden Sekundärrechts der EU vorlegen, und zwar“.

Seite 16, Anlage VII „Erklärung der Europäischen Kommission zu Fragen im Zusammenhang mit dem Missbrauch der Freizügigkeit“, Absatz 2, letzter Satz:

Anstatt:

Anstatt:

„Der Vorschlag wird vorgelegt, sobald der vorstehend genannte Beschluss in Kraft getreten ist.“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

„Der Vorschlag wird vorgelegt, nachdem der vorstehend genannte Beschluss wirksam geworden ist.“

---
No. 09-8014.

#### In re Charles Willy Alpine, Petitioner.

559 U.S. 1065, 130 S. Ct. 2139,

176 L. Ed. 2d 720,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3332.

April 19, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth Hicks, of Argentex Mining Corporation,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Argentex Mining
Corporation for the interim period ended April 30, 2009 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Argentex Mining Corporation

Dated: June 15, 2009

*/s/ Kenneth Hicks* Kenneth Hicks
President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Argentex Mining
Corporation and will be retained by Argentex Mining Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 32.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Form 10-QSB of China Autoparts, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Li
Yungao, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

/s/    Li Yungao
-------------------------
Li Yungao
CEO
Date: November 12, 2004
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Brownie’s Marine Group, Inc. (the
“ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the United
      States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:November
                11, 2008
            By:
            */s/
                Robert
                M. Carmichael*Name:
            Robert
                M. CarmichaelTitle:
            Chief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Brownie’s Marine Group, Inc. and will be
      retained by Brownie’s Marine Group, Inc. and furnished to the United States
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request .




EXHIBIT
            32.2
Site Name State County Site Method PQAO Date ug/m3

Liberty 42 003 0064 88101 Allegheny County,PA Health Department 20100208 69.9

Liberty 42 003 0064 88101 Allegheny County,PA Health Department 20140211 63.8

Liberty 42 003 0064 88101 Allegheny County,PA Health Department 20100110 59.8

Liberty 42 003 0064 88101 Allegheny County,PA Health Department 20111107 59

Liberty 42 003 0064 88101 Allegheny County,PA Health Department 20101109 58.4

Freemansburg 42 095 0025 88101 Pennsylvania Department Of Environmental Protection 20110609 58.2

Freemansburg 42 095 0025 88101 Pennsylvania Department Of Environmental Protection 20110608 58

Liberty 42 003 0064 88101 Allegheny County,PA Health Department 20111213 57

Bristol 42 017 0012 88101 Pennsylvania Department Of Environmental Protection 20110101 55.6

Freemansburg 42 095 0025 88101 Pennsylvania Department Of Environmental Protection 20120106 54.9
No. D-2463.

#### In the Matter of Disbarment of Bruce N. Sachar.

559 U.S. 1035, 130 S. Ct. 2087,

176 L. Ed. 2d 433,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2881.

March 29, 2010.

Disbarment order entered.

*434Former order, 558 U.S. 1044, 130 S. Ct. 794, 175 L. Ed. 2d 552, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 8452.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A1270. JEFFERY J. SAMUELS v. THE STATE.

After entering guilty pleas in 2021 to possession of marijuana with intent to

distribute and other crimes, Jeffery J. Samuels filed a motion for leave to file an

out-of-time appeal in March 2022. The trial court dismissed the motion for lack of

jurisdiction, and Samuels filed this appeal.

InCook v. State, the Supreme Court determined that a trial court lacks authority

to grant an out-of-time appeal. Cook v. State, ___ Ga. ___, ___ (5) (Case No.

S21A1270, decided March 15, 2022). Samuels, therefore, “had no right to file a

motion for an out-of-time appeal in the trial court; his remedy, if any, lies in habeas

corpus.” Rutledge v. State, ___ Ga. ___, ___ (Case No. S21A1036, decided March

15, 2022).

Thus, the trial court correctly determined that it did not have jurisdiction to

consider Samuels’s motion for leave to file an out-of-time appeal, and the court’s

order dismissing the motion does not present a cognizable basis for an appeal. See

Henderson v. State, 303 Ga. 241, 244 (2) (811 SE2d 388) (2018); Brooks v. State, 301

May 11, 2022
Ga. 748, 752 (2) (804 SE2d 1) (2017). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby

DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

05/11/2022
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Novellus Systems, Inc. of our report dated January 24, 1996, included in the
1995 Annual Report to Shareholders of Novellus Systems, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Novellus Systems,
Inc. listed in Item 14(a).  This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.
In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-88156, 33-51056, 33-36787, 33-25897, 33-62807) pertaining
to the Amended and Restated 1992 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Amended and
Restated 1984 Stock Option Plan, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the
Amended and Restated 1992 Stock Option Plan, in the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (No. 33-25418) pertaining to 1,500,000 shares of common stock and in
the Registration Statement on Form S-8 and Form S-3 (No. 33-30093) pertaining to
the 1984 Stock Option Plan, and in the related prospectuses with respect to the
consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by reference, and our
report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial
statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Novellus
Systems, Inc.


March 13, 1996
San Jose, California                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Attachment D:

40 CFR part 30: Grant Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals and other 

non-profits, and 40 CFR part 31: Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and 

Cooperative agreements to States and Local Governments, available on line at: 

http://www.epa.gov/QUALITY/qa_cfrs.html
1

John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment. Tex. Gov’t Code

Ann. § 75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2002). 

NO. 07-02-0015-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

DECEMBER 2, 2002

______________________________

BETTY FROST MCALEER, APPELLANT

V.

EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY AND

EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY, APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE 359TH DISTRICT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY;

NO. 97-12-04730-CV; HONORABLE JIM KEESHAN, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ., and BOYD, SJ.1

Concurring Opinion

I concur in the result reached by the majority for the following reason. Via the

“Amendment to Right of Way Agreement” executed on April 20, 1988, Texas Eastman

Company was designated the “grantee” or recipient of the easements or rights of way

encompassed in both the original grant dated September 5, 1961, and the April 20, 1988
2

amendment. Furthermore, the record illustrates that either Texas Eastman Company has

become a part of Eastman Chemical Company or that its assets were obtained by

Eastman Chemical. So, to the extent that the easements or rights of way were granted to

Texas Eastman and the latter is now part of Eastman Chemical or its assets are owned by

Eastman Chemical, there was a merger as defined by the parties in the September 5,

1961 conveyance. 

Brian Quinn

 Justice

Do not publish.
No. 09-933.

#### Janeen Miller, et al., Petitioners v. Kristen Nichols, et al.

559 U.S. 1008, 130 S. Ct. 1911,

176 L. Ed. 2d 367,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2677.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 586 F.3d 53.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of AFV Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Suzanne Herring, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Suzanne Herring                     |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Suzanne Herring |
|--------|-----------------|

|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|

|   | July 16, 2007 |
|--------|---------------|
No. 09-8884.

#### Winfred Forkner, Petitioner v. Clifton Kaho, Warden.

559 U.S. 1050, 130 S. Ct. 2345,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2948.

176 L. Ed. 2d 565,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Falcon Natural Gas Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Fred B.
Zaziski, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that;

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Fred B. Zaziski
--------------------------------------------
Name:  Fred B. Zaziski
Title:    Principal Executive Officer
Date:    May 18, 2006
# C_2017255EN.01000101.xml

| 5.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8563 — Intervias/Esso Italiana Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 255/01)

On 28 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8563. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8563. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
No. 09-9226.

#### Thomas Powers, Petitioner v. Illinois.

559 U.S. 1095, 130 S. Ct. 2376,

176 L. Ed. 2d 773,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3597.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 392 Ill. App. 3d 1131, 984 N.E.2d 209.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2008-5032 

GRIFFIN BROADBAND COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 

 and TOTAL TV OF FORT IRWIN, LLC, 

 Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

UNITED STATES, 

 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

 

 Robert K. Steinberg, Law Offices of Robert K. Steinberg, of Los Angeles, 

California, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. 

Joan M. Stentiford, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, 

United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendantappellee. With her on the brief were Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney 

General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Mark A. Melnick, Assistant Director. 

Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims 

Judge Christine O.C. Miller 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2008-5032 

GRIFFIN BROADBAND COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 

and TOTAL TV OF FORT IRWIN, LLC, 

 Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

UNITED STATES, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

 Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States Court of Federal Claims 

in CASE NO(S). 06-CV-898 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, RADER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

DATED August 12, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.2











Certification
of Chief Financial Officer of ULURU Inc.


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant


to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002











In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ULURU Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the
“Report”), the undersigned officer of ULURU Inc. does hereby certify, pursuant
to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
(18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1.)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2.)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.











Date: November 16, 2009
            
            /s/
      Terrance K. WallbergTerrance
      K. WallbergVice
      President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
No. 09-9018.

#### Jose H. Velazquez, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1020, 130 S. Ct. 1917,

176 L. Ed. 2d 389,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2348.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 349 Fed. Appx. 339.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-2092

Lower Tribunal No. 17-CA-002698

_____________________________

KACEY CHIDDISTER,

Appellant, 

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County.

Joseph C. Fuller, Judge.

March 19, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

NARDELLA, MIZE and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.

Lelia M. M. Schleier, Stacie J. Schmerling, and Howard M. Talenfeld, of Justice for 

Kids, a division of Kelley Kronenberg, Fort Lauderdale, and Michael A. Bernstein, 

of Michael A. Bernstein, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Richard A. Filson, of Filson & 

Penge, P.A., Sarasota for Appellant.

William O. Kratochvil and Joseph D. Bootka, of Vernis & Bowling of Southwest 

Florida, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED