alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WebFilings | EDGAR view


 


Exhibit 10.07
2011 DISTRIBUTION ELECTION FORM
Valero Energy Corporation
Deferred Compensation Plan
 
		
	Payment Election
Upon Retirement
	DEFAULT PAYMENT IF NO ELECTION IS MADE:
Fifteen annual installments commencing at date of retirement

	I elect that, upon retirement, the value of my Plan account related to deferrals made for the 2011 Plan Year will be paid at the time and in the manner elected below:
 
Payment Commencement (choose one):
 
o As soon as administratively possible following retirement 
                (this the default if no election is made)
o January 1 after the year of retirement
 
AND
 
Form of Distribution (choose one):
 
o Lump sum payment
o Annual installments for _______ years (choose 2 - 15 years)




 
		
	Payment Election
Upon Other Separation
	DEFAULT PAYMENT IF NO ELECTION IS MADE:
Immediate lump sum payable upon separation

	I elect that, upon my separation from employment for a reason other than retirement, the value of my Plan account related to deferrals made for the 2011 Plan Year will be paid at the time and in the manner elected below:
 
Payment Commencement (choose one):
 
o As soon as administratively possible following separation 
           (this is the default if no election is made)
o January 1 after the year of separation
 
AND
 
Form of Distribution (choose one):
 
o Lump sum (this is the default payment if no election is made)
o Five annual installments




 
 
 
«First_name» «Last_name»
 
 

 


 


			
	Distribution on Specified Date

	In accordance with Section 6.4 of the Plan, I hereby elect to receive in one lump sum payment my Account derived from deferrals made during the 2011 Plan Year on the date or dates specified below, or the balance of the Account, if less.  Any amounts distributed pursuant to this election shall immediately reduce my Account accordingly.  (The earliest date that can be elected to receive 2011 deferrals is January 1, 2015.)
 

	Specified Date
	 
	Amount of Elective Deferral or 
Total Amount of the Account (Whichever is Less)

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 




 
NOTE:  In order to be effective, this form must be completed, signed, and returned to Financial Benefits (San Antonio/Mailstation E1L) on or before December 3, 2010.  If your form is not timely submitted, your Plan deferral will be subject to the default distributions noted above.
 
The Company has taken measures to design the Plan in a manner that conforms to current tax law.  However, it is possible that new legislation could affect your distribution elections, including delaying your distributions, in order to comply with legal requirements.  Distribution elections submitted pursuant to the Plan will be governed by the terms and conditions of the Plan and governing law, and your elections will be subject to modifications made to the Plan in order to conform to legal requirements.
 
 
ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:
 
			
	 
	 
	 

	Participant's Signature
	 
	Date

	 
	 
	 

	«First_name» «Last_name»
	 
	«Emplid»

	Participant's Name
	 
	Participant's Employee ID Number
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4919 

To extend the educational flexibility program under section 4 of the Education 

Flexibility Partnership Act of 1999. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2006 

Mr. CASTLE (for himself, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, and Mr. PLATTS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce 

A BILL 

To extend the educational flexibility program under section 

4 of the Education Flexibility Partnership Act of 1999. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EDUCATIONAL FLEXIBILITY PROGRAM EXTEN4 SION. 

5 (a) EXTENSION AUTHORITY.—Notwithstanding any 

6 other provision of law, the Secretary of Education is au7 thorized to carry out the educational flexibility program 

8 under section 4 of the Education Flexibility Partnership 

9 Act of 1999 (20 U.S.C. 5891b), until the date of enact10 ment of an Act that reauthorizes programs under part A 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4919 IH 

1 of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

2 of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311 et seq.), for any State that was 

3 an Ed-Flex Partnership State on September 30, 2004. 

4 (b) DESIGNATION.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Any designation of a State 

6 as an Ed-Flex Partnership State that was in effect 

7 on September 30, 2004, shall be extended until the 

8 date of enactment of an Act that reauthorizes pro9 grams under part A of title I of the Elementary and 

10 Secondary Education Act of 1965, if the Secretary 

11 of Education makes the determination described in 

12 paragraph (2). 

13 (2) DETERMINATION.—The determination re14 ferred to in paragraph (1) is a determination that 

15 the performance of the State educational agency, in 

16 carrying out the programs for which the State has 

17 received a waiver under the educational flexibility 

18 program, justifies the extension of the designation. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4552]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,326]


Horton Mfg. Co. LLC, Tallmadge, OH; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 23, 2009 in response to a 
worker petition filed on behalf of workers of Horton Mfg. Co. LLC, 
Tallmadge, Ohio.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of February 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-4552 Filed 3-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
No. 09-9639.

#### Edward Eugene Young, Petitioner v. Rhode Island, et al.

559 U.S. 1099, 130 S. Ct. 2387,

176 L. Ed. 2d 779,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3620,

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Exhibit 13.2





Certification by the Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Kaixin Auto Holdings (the “Company”) on Form 20-F, as amended by Amendment No.1 on Form 20-F/A for the year ended
December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Yi Yang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 27, 2022



|By:    | /s/ Yi Yang                 | 
|------ | --------------------------- | 
|Name:  | Yi Yang                     | 
|Title: | Principal Financial Officer | 
|       |                             |
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TCI Solutions, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Stephen
P. DeSantis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|3. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|4. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                      |  |     |  |                                            
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: August 19, 2002 |  | By: |  | /s/ Stephen P. DeSantis                    
|                      |  |     |  |                                            
|                      |  |     |  | Stephen P. DeSantis
Chief Financial Officer
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-5013

_____________________________

MATTHEW DUNCAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Marianne L. Aho, Judge.

October 17, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
APP B

 DSCPM 4155.2

************************

• MONOGRAPH NO.: 6A3

************************

ITEM: Grape Beverage Base (BBG)

NSN: 8960-01-227-1721 ITEM SPECIFICATION: MIL-B-35023

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 150

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

 APPEARANCE: Dehydrated: Purple brown, fine powder.

Rehydrated: Purple brown, clear liquid.

 ODOR: Sweet, artificial grape.

 FLAVOR: Sweet, artificial grape.

 TEXTURE: Free flowing, fine powder, without lumps that cannot

be broken apart by light finger pressure.

 ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT 70 DEGREES F: 36 months

 80 DEGREES F: 30 months

 90 DEGREES F: 24 months

 100 DEGREES F: 18 months

EXPECTED DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

 APPEARANCE: Rehydrated: Coagulated, gelation, surface

frothing or cloudiness, excessive sediment significantly

affecting aesthetic appearance or flavor.

 ODOR: Burnt, scorched, moldy/mildew.

 FLAVOR: Oxidized or any other flavor not typical of the type

of beverage.

 TEXTURE: Lumpy or caked, not free flowing.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: Prepare beverage IAW package

instructions. Product should dissolve completely within about two minutes.

SPECIAL NOTES: If slight sedimentation and clouding are observed

but the odor and flavor are normal, do not score the sedimentation as a defect

during surveillance inspection; make note of it in the narrative for future

use. Coagulation/gelation may occur if the original formulation was incorrect

or if the product has been temperature abused for a long time.

Coagulation/gelation presents as clumps of granules that do not readily

dissolve when product is reconstituted. Particles tend to float in suspension

(look like gel pockets or tapioca granules that are clumped together).
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 42 (Thursday, March 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4718]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-523-000]


Alliant Energy Industrial Services, Inc.; Notice of Filing

February 26, 2009.
    Take notice that on January 5, 2009, Alliant Energy Industrial 
Services, Inc., pursuant to sections 35.13 and 131.53 of Commission 
Regulations, 18 CFR 35.15 and 131.53, filed a Notice of Cancellation of 
their Rate Schedule FERC No. 1, a market-based rate wholesale power 
sales tariff.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#40060512030f2e2c292e25133530302f323400262532236e272f36"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="02444750414d6c6e6b6c67517772726d707642646770612c656d74">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 9, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-4718 Filed 3-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FORM NOVELLUS
SYSTEMS, INC 1995 10K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          60,114
<SECURITIES>                                    89,685
<RECEIVABLES>                                  114,284
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,196
<INVENTORY>                                     36,779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               318,163
<PP&E>                                          68,450
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,745
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 364,688
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,906
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       118,423
<OTHER-SE>                                     154,359
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   364,688
<SALES>                                        373,732
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               373,732
<CGS>                                          157,585
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  157,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               100,356
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   495
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 227
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                125,065
<INCOME-TAX>                                    42,522
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             82,543
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    82,543
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.82
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 404A18

Filed 29 March 2019

COUNTY OF DURHAM, by and through DURHAM DSS, ex rel. SHARON L. 

WILSON and TIFFANY A. KING

v.

ROBERT BURNETTE

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of 

the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 821 S.E.2d 840 (2018), vacating orders

entered on 23 November 2016 by Judge Fred Battaglia in District Court, Durham

County, and remanding for entry of new orders. Heard in the Supreme Court on 6 

March 2019.

Office of the County Attorney, by Geri Ruzage, Senior Assistant County 

Attorney, for plaintiff-appellant.

Mary McCullers Reece for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Justice DAVIS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
No. 09-9138.

#### Carson Darnell Combs, Petitioner v. Dennis Pedersen, Sheriff, Monroe County, Wisconsin.

559 U.S. 1076, 130 S. Ct. 2108,

176 L. Ed. 2d 737,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3446.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 351 Fed. Appx. 130.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TCW Direct Lending VII LLC (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James G. Krause, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ James G. Krause
|Name:               |  | James G. Krause        
|Title:              |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:               |  | March 19, 2019         

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed
as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 8, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41267

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TIRSO CASTILLO-ARREOLA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

No. 1:04-CR-348-5

--------------------

Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Tirso Castillo-Arreola pleaded guilty of conspiracy to transport and harbor aliens within the United States and transporting

aliens within the United States. The court sentenced him to the

top of the guideline range, 105 months’ imprisonment on each count

to run concurrently with each other but consecutively to his other

sentences. The court stated that it adopted the findings of the
No. 05-41267

-2-

presentence report and considered the evidence adduced at the trial

of Castillo-Arreola’s co-defendants.

Castillo-Arreola argues that the court imposed the sentence

without consideration of the sentencing factors in 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a). Because counsel raised no objection to the court’s

statement of its justification or lack thereof for the sentence, we

review only for plain error. See United States v. Akpan, 407 F.3d

360, 368 (5th Cir. 2005) (citations omitted).

The decision in United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511 (5th

Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 43 (2005), is dispositive. There

we stated unequivocally that “[i]f the sentencing judge exercises

her discretion to impose a sentence within a properly calculated

Guideline range, in our reasonableness review we will infer that

the judge has considered all the factors for a fair sentence set

forth in the Guidelines.” Id. at 519. Castillo-Arreola does not

argue that his sentence is unreasonable or that his guideline range

was improperly calculated. Because the sentence is within the

guideline range, we infer that the district court considered the §

3553 factors. See Mares, id.; United States v. Izaguirre-Losoya,

219 F.3d 437, 440 (5th Cir. 2000). Castillo-Arreola has failed to

show plain error in his sentencing.

AFFIRMED.
No. 09-8659.

#### Phillip York, Petitioner v. Alvil Chapman, Warden.

559 U.S. 983, 130 S. Ct. 1716,

176 L. Ed. 2d 199,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1909.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.