alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4995 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 3, 2006 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 7 Columbus Avenue in Tuckahoe, New York, 

as the ‘‘Ronald Bucca Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
2 

HR 4995 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. RONALD BUCCA POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 7 Columbus Avenue in Tuckahoe, 

4 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Ronald 

5 Bucca Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ronald Bucca Post 

10 Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 2, 2006. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
No. 09-10082.

#### Charles Grier, Petitioner v. United States.

560 U.S. 902, 130 S. Ct. 3312,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1181,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3892.

May 17, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until June 7, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court. Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 09-0522

IN RE  JOHN M. O'QUINN, P.C. D/B/A O'QUINN & LAMINACK; JOHN M. O'QUINN & ASSOCIATES, A TEXAS GENERAL PARTNERSHIP; JOHN M. O'QUINN & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P. D/B/A O'QUINN & LAMINACK; JOHN M. O'QUINN LAW FIRM, P.L.L.C.; O'QUINN & LAMINACK; AND JOHN M. O'QUINN

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

**ORDERED:**

1.Relators’ motion for emergency temporary relief, filed June 26, 2009, is granted.  The order dated June 10, 2009, in Cause No. 12-08-00011-CV, styled *John M. O'Quinn, PC, d/b/a O'Quinn & Laminack, John M. O'Quinn & Associates, a Texas General Partnership, John M. O'Quinn & Associates, LLP, d/b/a O'Quinn & Laminack, John M. O'Quinn Law Firm, PLLC, O'Quinn & Laminack and John M. O'Quinn v. Martha Wood and Patricia Haynes*in the Twelfth Court of Appeals, and the district court orders dated February 29, 2008 and June 22, 2009, in Cause No. 99-219, styled *Martha Wood, et al. v. John M. O'Quinn, P.C. d/b/a O'Quinn & Laminack, et al.*, in the 4th District Court of Rusk County, Texas, are stayed pending further order of this Court.

2.The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this Court.

Done at the City of Austin, this August 21, 2009.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
No. 09-1152.

#### William Brandt, as Chapter 7 Trustee of the Estates of Plassein International Corp., et al., Petitioners v. B.A. Capital Co. LP, et al.

559 U.S. 1093, 130 S. Ct. 2389,

176 L. Ed. 2d 769,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3559.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 590 F.3d 252.
Print	

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ODNI News Release No. 10-24 April 12, 2024

 

#### DNI Haines Welcomes Jon Rosenwasser as the IC Chief Financial Officer

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Director of National Intelligence Avril D. Haines today issued the following statement:

"I am delighted to welcome Jon Rosenwasser as the Intelligence Community Chief Financial Officer (IC CFO). Jon comes to ODNI from Capitol Hill, where he has been professional staff of the Senate Select Committee for Intelligence (SSCI) since 2013, most recently as Budget and Policy Director. In his new role as IC CFO, Jon will lead IC-wide efforts to fulfill the DNI's role to develop, determine, and present the National Intelligence Program (NIP) budget to the President for approval. Jon will work across the 18 IC elements and seven federal departments and agencies, with the Office of Management and Budget, and with Congress.

"Jon previously worked at the ODNI from 2006 to 2013, serving on the National Intelligence Council and in senior strategy roles. In addition to his deep congressional and intelligence experience, Jon's national security career includes a number of think tank fellowships and positions in academia to include his current work as an adjunct professor of the practice at Duke University's Terry Sanford School of Public Policy and regular guest lectures at several universities. Jon is an exceptional leader whose incredible knowledge and integrity will serve ODNI very well as he integrates all budget activities across the IC and manages the National Intelligence Program. It is a true pleasure to welcome Jon back to ODNI!"

###
No. 09-8296.

#### Ronald Christopher Bingham, Petitioner v. Texas.

559 U.S. 979, 130 S. Ct. 1704,

176 L. Ed. 2d 193,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2079.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
No. 09-9290.

#### Leroy Webber, Petitioner v. Florida.

559 U.S. 1096, 130 S. Ct. 2380,

176 L. Ed. 2d 775,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3570.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 29 So. 3d 292.
No. 09-7351.

#### Floyd Deberry, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1038, 130 S. Ct. 2060,

176 L. Ed. 2d 416,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2788.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 576 F.3d 708.
Attendee Report GoToWebinar

Webinar Name Webinar ID

ASRAC Commercial HVAC, CRE, and WH 

Working Group: Meeting and Webinar

123739945

Actual Start Date/Time Actual Duration (minutes) 

Jul 18, 2013 07:25 AM EDT 448

Total Attended

30

Session Details

First Name Last Name Email Country Address City State Organization Zip Code

ashley armstrong US 1000 Independence Avenue Washington DC DOE 20585

Rodney Beever US 491 E. princess St. York PA United CoolAir Corp. 17403

rick bostian US 5901 river oaks rd edmond OK WaterFurnace International 73013

Joshua Cocciardi US 950 L'enfant Plaza SW washington DC Dept. of Energy 20585

Stuart Dill US 801 Corporate Centre Dr. O'Fallon MO Schneider Electric 63368

Hank Edmunds US 5005 York Drive Norman OK Johnson Controls 73069

tim hammond US 9000 conservation way fort wayne IN WaterFurnace International 46809

Charles Hon US 2001 East Terra Lane O'Fallon MO True Manufacturing Co 63366-4434

Larry Howington US 1925 Ruffin Mill Road Colonial Heights VA AHRI 23834

Brian Jeanes US 908 HWY 15 North New Albany MS Master-Bilt Products 38652

Dominic Kolandayan US 1645 Wallace Dr Carrollton TX Daikin 75006

Jonathan Lemmond US 2111 Wilson Boulevard Arlington VA AHRI 22201

John McLaughlin US 4900 Tech Blvd Auburn NY Daikin McQuay 13021

Peter Molvie US 3232 W. Lancaster Ave. Milwaukee WI Cleaver-Brooks 53209

John Morris US 539 Dunksferry Bensalem PA Continental Refrigerator 19020

Frank Myers US 3209 Galvez Avenue Fort Worth TX PVI Industries, LLC 76111

Kathy Padfield US 800 A Beaty Street Davidson NC Ingersoll Rand - Trane 28036

wes roan US 1914 randolph dr. bryan OH Bard Manufacturing Co., Inc. 43506

Carl Roberts US 1401 Grandview Avenue Oconomowoc WI Zero zone, Inc 53066

Joe Sanders US 4401 Blue Mound Rd. Fort Worth TX Traulsen 76106

Ron Shebik US 12999 St. Charles Rock Road Bridgeton MO Hussmann 63044

Frank Stanonik US 2111 Wilson Blvd. Arlington VA AHRI 22201

General Information
Louis Starr US 421SW 6th Suite 600 Portland OR NEEA 97217

Mike Stem US 1809 10th St Plano TX Intertek 75074

Eric Truskoski US 200 Lafayette St. Middleville MI Bradford White Corporation 49333

Tom Walsh US 4900 Technology Park Blvd Auburn NY Daikin McQuay 13021

Yoolanda Williams US AP2-121 Louisville KY General Electric 40225

Michael Woodford US 2111 Wilson Blvd., Suite # 500 Arlington VA AHRI 22201

Wes Wostal US 7300 SW 44th St. Oklahoma City OK ClimateMaster 73179

Ed Wuesthoff US 10001 reunion place, ste. 500 san antonio TX Friedrich Air Conditioning 

Company

78249
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to theQuarterly Report of Eon Labs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, William F. Holt, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|               | /s/ William F. Holt     |   |
|--------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|               | William F. Holt         |
|               | Chief Financial Officer |
|               |                    |
|               |                    |
| November 13,  2003 |                    |

 

----
No. 09-8887.

#### Paul Will, Petitioner v. Burl Cain, Warden.

559 U.S. 1094, 130 S. Ct. 2372,

176 L. Ed. 2d 771,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3631.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 348 Fed. Appx. 35.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-777

_____________________________

ROSHAD SHONAD FOSTER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Bruce Anderson, Judge.

May 8, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

WOLF, MAKAR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Roshad Shonad Foster, pro se, Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Robert Quentin Humphrey,

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GEORGE VILLEGAS; BOB POELKER; 

MARCELO ORTA; DON DEROSIERS,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. 05-15725

v. D.C. No. 

GILROY GARLIC FESTIVAL CV-01-20720-JW

ASSOCIATION; D. BERGMAN, Officer; ORDER

CITY OF GILROY,

Defendants-Appellees. 

Filed September 14, 2007

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active

judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by

the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The threejudge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to

this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to

the extent adopted by the en banc court.

12521
PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted

© 2007 Thomson/West.
No. 09-8895.

#### Ealise Crumb, Petitioner v. Kmart Corporation, et al.

559 U.S. 1051, 130 S. Ct. 2345,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3022.

176 L. Ed. 2d 565,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Joning Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, John Jones, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



August 20, 2004


/s/  John Jones
-----------------------------
     John Jones,
     Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Li Yungao, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of China  Autoparts,
Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c)  presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 20, 2004


/s/ Li Yungao
---------------------
Li Yungao
CEO
Exhibit 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, John O. Jones, Jr. Chief Executive Officer of Joning Corp. certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Joning Corp.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report
(the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

     6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


October 21, 2004


/s/  John O. Jones, Jr.
-----------------------------
     John O. Jones, Jr.
     Chief Executive Officer
ex10_12.htm






Exhibit 10.12







Summary Description of


Named Executive Officer Compensation












On December 13, 2010, the Management and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of TETRA Technologies, Inc. (the Company) approved increases in annual base salary levels for certain of the Company’s current officers who were identified as named executive officers in the Company’s 2010 proxy statement, to be effective as of January 3, 2011:








	

Named Executive Officer



	

Title



	

Prior Base Salary



	

Base Salary as of 

January 3, 2011




	
Stuart M. Brightman

	
President and Chief Executive Officer

	
$500,000

	
$535,000


	
Joseph M. Abell

	
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

	
$285,000

	
$300,000


	
Philip N. Longorio

	
Senior Vice President

	
$325,000

	
$342,000


	
Edwin H. Goldman

	
Senior Vice President

	
$325,000

	
$342,000


	
Bass C. Wallace, Jr.

	
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

	
$260,000

	
$274,000












Each of the named executive officers has entered into an employment agreement in a form substantially identical to the form of agreement executed by all of TETRA’s employees. Each agreement evidences the at-will nature of employment and does not set forth or guarantee the term of employment, salary, or other incentives, all of which are entirely at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Each named executive officer is eligible to participate in TETRA’s incentive programs generally available to its salaried employees, including health, life, disability and other insurance and benefits, 401(k) Plan, Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, and vacation, paid sick leave, and other employee benefits.
<PAGE>


                REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
   of Montgomery Ward Holding Corp:


      Re: Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 28, 1996




This letter is written to meet the requirements of Regulation S-K calling for a
letter from a registrant's independent accountants whenever there has been a
change in accounting principle or practice. As of December 28, 1996, the Company
changed from the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method of accounting for
inventories to the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method. According to the
management of the Company, this change was made to better measure the current
value of such inventories and provides for a more appropriate matching of
current costs and current revenues consistent with the Company's merchandising
strategy.

A complete coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for determining
the preferability of accounting principles among acceptable alternative
principles has not been established by the accounting profession. Thus, we
cannot make an objective determination of whether the change in accounting
described in the preceding paragraph is to a preferable method. However, we have
reviewed the pertinent factors, including those related to financial reporting,
in this particular case on a subjective basis, and our opinion stated below is
based on our determination made in this manner.

We are of the opinion that the Company's change in method of accounting is to an
acceptable alternative method of accounting, which, based upon the reasons
stated for the change and our discussions with you, is also preferable under the
circumstances in this particular case. In arriving at this opinion, we have
relied on the business judgment and business planning of your management.




                                                      ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 27, 1997
No. 09-9259.

#### Sergio Garcia-Velazco, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1025, 130 S. Ct. 1931,

176 L. Ed. 2d 398,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2413.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 356 Fed. Appx. 571.
QrnALD c. MANN 

-.n ..IOFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

lib. c, tin'. Norrid 

County Attorney 

Silver-ton, Texas 

Dear kr. Norrid: 

Your letter of January 4, sddreshea to the 

Attorney General has been referred 'to t&e writer for 

January 9, 1939 

Opinion No. G-4!? 

Re: Sheriff's fees in %.QX 

suits 

reply. You request to be dvksea ~?n the following 

question: Wan the sherif 1 iege&y 6harge more than 

$2.00 in any tax sud,t regardless of~the number of 

citations served a@ work perfcrmecWW 

In repiy ti th&s quesk$on you are respectfully advised &hat the Legislature tis the sole 

power to provide %r coliqtion of delinquent taxes, 

and to fix the fees allowed each state officer in 

such SUi$B. Arti?cle 9332 of the R. C. 2. of l'exar 

reads M paPt: 

'The Sheriff or Constable of the County 

ki 

which /the suit is pending shali receive a 

e of 'I% ($2.00) Dollars in each case 

wh'hch will cover the service of all process, 

and the selling of the property and executing deeds fW same." 

In the above Article the Legislature specifically sets out the fee in esch tax case, even though 

other taxing units are impleaded or intervene, as provided for in Article 7345b. It remains one and the same 

case, and the Legislature made no provision under Article 7345b to allow the sheriff any additional fee. 

In our opinion the Sheriff of the county in 

which the suit is pending can notlegally charge more 

than $2.00 in any tax suit, regardless of the number 
hr. C. W. Norrid, January 9, 1939, Page 2 

of citations served and work performed. 

Yours very truly 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

By (Signed) Claud 0. Boothman 

-=sslstimt 

COB-KR 

APPROVXD 

(Signed) Gerald C. Eann 

ATTORKZY GEERAL OF TEXAS