alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 7 (Monday, January 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1273-1274]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-474]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6480]


In the Matter of the Review of the Designation of Mujahedin-e 
Khalq Organization (MEK), and All Designated Aliases, as a Foreign 
Terrorist Organization Upon Petition Filed Pursuant to Section 219 of 
the Immigration and Nationality Act, as Amended

    The MEK filed a petition for revocation of its designation as a 
foreign terrorist organization (the ``Petition''). Based upon a review 
of the Administrative Record assembled in this matter, including the 
Petition and associated filings by the MEK, pursuant to Section 
219(a)(4)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 
U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(B)) (``INA''), and in consultation with the Attorney 
General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I conclude that the 
circumstances that were the basis for the 2003 re-designation of the 
aforementioned organization as a

[[Page 1274]]

foreign terrorist organization have not changed in such a manner as to 
warrant revocation of the designation and that the national security of 
the United States does not warrant a revocation.
    Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the 
aforementioned organization as a foreign terrorist organization, 
pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be 
maintained.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: January 7, 2009.
Condoleezza Rice,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
 [FR Doc. E9-474 Filed 1-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
No. 09-9660.

#### Curtis Smiley, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1099, 130 S. Ct. 2387,

176 L. Ed. 2d 779,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3528.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 356 Fed. Appx. 302.
No. 09-9063.

#### James Edward Lang, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

559 U.S. 1074, 130 S. Ct. 2104,

176 L. Ed. 2d 734,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3301.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 23 So. 3d 712.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Nikolas Antonopoulos, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date:  August 2, 2007 By:  /s/   *Nikolas Antonopoulos*   Nikolas Antonopoulos   President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 09-10396 (09A1009).

#### Samuel Bustamante, Petitioner v. Texas.

559 U.S. 1103, 130 S. Ct. 2400,

176 L. Ed. 2d 788,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3673.

April 27, 2010.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

GAMESA ENERGY USA, LLC AND

GAMESA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION INC.,

Petitioners

v.

TEN PENN CENTER ASSOCIATES, L.P.

AND SAP V TEN PENN CENTER NF G.P. L.L.C.,

Respondent s :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 139 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

GAMESA ENERGY USA, LLC AND

GAMESA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION INC.,

Respondents

v.

TEN PENN CENTER ASSOCIATES, L.P.

AND SAP V TEN PENN CENTER NF G.P. L.L.C.,

Petitioners :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 152 EAL 2018

Cross Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior

Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20 th day of August , 2018 , the Petition for Allowance of Appeal at

139 EAL 2018 is GRANTED . The issue s , as stated by petitioner s , are :1. May a litigant simultaneously pursue inconsistent, alternative remedies in a civil action in Pennsylvania prior to the entry of final judgment?

2. When one party to a contract breaches, should the non

- breaching party be permitted to continue performance, if reasonable under the circumstances, and to maintain, in the alternative, causes of action for termination of the agreement if material, or if not material, for damages from the breach?

The Cross Petition for Allowance of Appeal at 152 EAL 2018 is DENIED

.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00102

- CV

LILY AVIATION, LLC A ND RAFAEL

C. PALMEIRO APPELLANTS

V.

WELLS FARGO EQUIPMEN T

FINANCE, INC. APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 141ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

-- ----------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered appellant s ’ “ Motion To Dismiss Appeal .” It is the

court = s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant s , for which let execution

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: July 12, 2012
No. 09-9427.

#### Lawrence L. Mayes, Petitioner v. Greg Province, Warden.

559 U.S. 1110, 130 S. Ct. 2414,

176 L. Ed. 2d 931,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3685.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 353 Fed. Appx. 100.
6 

# V ' -TT. 7-3^-62

-Fffi-ITW JZ7 A//EV£je f///£r/ s? 2A&CL 

# s£l /Lfew&e. 

# D/s<*Jj/hrs*c/ si/0 cS^as/^asc^ 0*s rJu*/&'- £7, &0/c2 

# a?*sc/ A*y C2.C./7 ,vs) /<s A/a/' 777&9-a/ rt// 

# ^A//^~/e/^'?//<3>A/ ~r //&ia& A^u&s/<±r-c/ u/As&& J-//9i/^r S^&i/ a*/ &&e)//p/ 63<2C/9-<Sag*a A/&s&tf\ 

# £&?/ s&H&UJ£X\. .^. 

# i>i//t^/ a<> s4tt=•*S7&7&t<; o/^ stf/f 7£r/A'osK/ /1*^i//£//iK? TZisa?/ Jte3j&/ '&&/£#*/ <?a/ 7)aV/?~ 

# ^ATSt/// //&#*/*/$j .-.. 777/?/ IsiSaZS ,ftTA// /d> A^^r 

# /JJW/a/^/^ur/kuf/ /SfefiSMk aVw 7Jwy.^~-

t&c/ /4af cSikyi**. ^/^ ^y //ay i*/x>// ^/r M?t?A^A%5 SZtApUS M&/--iawa*£ /s~^g//a/. h<#j?/ &£> ^. dsae/Z. $£/V/<z4&r/ fit,*//**? Aw^ /2^g6aS& /Ju /#& dh<y/^ &/^rte/'/tf/AS'?-/.. 

# /&S6E*/ A^t^e si*y C?£a?AfA*. f7Z 7J9-&3)



# *ftW'-.sk^A^&^k/g..y_.~-. <•*</*/*• A<y^y^ a£&^s £azXs/£tc/ ZZ- A^&C*/ •*4Sa4a?^S J&ZfXs'•aOM/a/s^/.. 

# £&4?A?/ AS ?22*Jtty&') *---y ",• t 

# '&$&<L *J, S^ri&ASHARON KELLER PRESIDING JUDGE

LAWRENCE E. MEYERS CHERYL JOHNSON MIKE KEASLER BARBARA P. HERVEY ELSA ALCALA BERT RICHARDSON KEVIN P. YEARY DAVID NEWELL

JUDGES 

### Court ofCriminal Appeals P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

CEDRIC DEMICHAEL BUTLER Dallas County Jail - TDC # 14038893 500 Commerce St. Dallas, TX 75202 Re: Butler, Cedric Demichael CCA No. WR-77,739-01 Trial Court Case No. W90-01404-T(A) February 02, 2015

Your letter has been received. Please be advised: ABEL ACOSTA CLERK (512)463-1551

SIAN SCHILHAB GENERAL COUNSEL

(512)463-1597

IMPORTANT: WRITING. PLEASE INFORM THIS COURT OF ALL ADDRESS CHANGES IN 

### • To obtain Copies ofitems requested, contact the State Law Library, Inmate Copy Service, at PO Box 12367, Austin Texas 78711-23267. Please be sure to include yourfull name and any 

### aliases, TDCJ number, date ofconviction, county ofconviction, appeal numberand complete mailing address. 

### • Your records will not be returned to you because once records are received in the Court they become the permanentrecords ofthis Court 

### S Your application for writ ofhabeas corpus has been received Tuesday, May 29, 2012. The status is: DISMISSED

- SENTENCE DISCHARGED on June 27, 2012.

• Neither the Judges nor the staffofthe Court can give legal advice. We recommend you ^-.
. , i contact Inmate Legal Services at the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional



## MS 15 W Division. Sincerely,

Supreme Court Building, 201 West 14th Street, Room 106, Austin, Texas 78701 Website www.txcourts.gov/cca.aspx
EXHIBIT 32.1


                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
                       ANTHONY & SYLVAN POOLS CORPORATION
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350


I, Stuart D. Neidus, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Anthony & Sylvan
Pools Corporation, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (2) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), that:


     (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
          September 30, 2003 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement
          accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))
          and

     (2)  information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Anthony & Sylvan Pools Corporation


This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906 and is
not being filed as part of the Periodic Report.



Date: October 28, 2003                 /s/ Stuart D. Neidus
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Stuart D. Neidus
                                       Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


                                       18
No. 09-7917.

#### C. G., Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.

559 U.S. 945, 130 S. Ct. 1516,

176 L. Ed. 2d 124,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1239.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office, denied.

Same case below, 974 A.2d 1180.
No. 09-9026.

#### David Miller, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

559 U.S. 1073, 130 S. Ct. 2101,

176 L. Ed. 2d 732,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3400,

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of West Bancorporation, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas R. Gulling,
Chief Financial Officer of West Bancorporation, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
conditions and results of operations of West Bancorporation, Inc.


May 5, 2004

/s/ Douglas R. Gulling
------------------------------
Douglas R. Gulling
Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. 1350) The undersigned, Julian R. Geiger, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of Aeropostale, Inc. (the Company) has executed this
certificated in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended October 30, 2004 (the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act); and 2. The information contained the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of
the 3rd day of December, 2004. /s/      JULIAN R. GEIGERJulian R. GeigerChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 23
No. 09-8386.

#### Paul Pennant, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 955, 130 S. Ct. 1548,

176 L. Ed. 2d 140,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1478.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with the quarterly report of West Bancorporation, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David D. Nelson, Chief Executive Officer and President of West Bancorporation, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of West Bancorporation, Inc.








October 29, 2010








/s/ David D. Nelson


David D. Nelson


Chief Executive Officer and President





50
No. 09-9657.

#### Dean Lawther, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1083, 130 S. Ct. 2128,

176 L. Ed. 2d 749,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3231.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 355 Fed. Appx. 357.
No. 09-8311.

#### David Tinkham, Petitioner v. Wendy Knight, Superintendent, Plainfield Correctional Facility.

559 U.S. 980, 130 S. Ct. 1706,

176 L. Ed. 2d 194,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2089.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MARIA KAZOURIS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-3327 ) THE CITY OF TARPON SPRINGS, ) ) Respondent. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed 

### February 8, 2019. Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Jack R. St. Arnold, Judge. Maria Kazouris, pro se Jay Daigneault of Trask · Daigneault, LLP, Clearwater, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Denied. NORTHCUTT, 

### M ORRIS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
<Page>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.28

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this "First Amendment") is made as
of this 7th day of November 2001, by and between APCOA/Standard Parking, Inc.
(formerly known as "APCOA, Inc."), a Delaware corporation (the "Company") and
Robert N. Sacks (the "Executive").

                                    RECITALS

A.   The Executive and the Company have previously executed a certain Employment
Agreement dated as of May 18, 1998 (the "Employment Agreement").

B.   The Company and Executive have agreed to certain additional terms relating
to Executive's employment as more fully set forth.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the Recitals, the mutual promises and
undertakings herein set forth, and the sum of Ten Dollars in hand paid, the
receipt and sufficiency of which consideration are hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereby agree that the Employment Agreement shall be deemed modified and
amended, effective immediately, as follows:

1.   Section 3 (a) is hereby amended by deleting the amount "$170,000" and
inserting in lieu thereof the amount "$240,000". The new Annual Base Salary
shall commence on November 12, 2001.

2.   Section 3 (b) is hereby amended by deleting the entire paragraph and
substituting the following paragraph in lieu thereof:

     "(b) BONUS. For each calendar year ending during the Employment Period, the
Executive shall be eligible to receive an annual bonus (the Annual Bonus"),
based upon the terms and conditions of an annual bonus program to be established
by the Company. Any such annual bonus program shall provide the Executive's
target bonus ("Target Bonus") will be 30% of the Annual Base Salary, with the
actual amount of the Annual Bonus determined in accordance with the terms of the
annual bonus program. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, for the 2001
fiscal year, the Executive's Annual Bonus shall not be less than $72,000.

3.   Except as previously modified above, all of the remaining terms and
provisions of the Employment Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed in all
respects, and shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with their
terms.

<Page>

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have executed this First
Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

COMPANY:

------------------------------
James Wilhelm
President, Chief Executive Officer

EXECUTIVE:

------------------------------
Robert N. Sacks
# C_2016466EN.01002001.xml

| 14.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 466/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 466/20

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2016/C 466/11)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lever arch mechanisms | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 796/2012 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of lever arch mechanisms originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 238, 4.9.2012, p. 5). | 5.9.2017 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Lever arch mechanisms

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 796/2012 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of lever arch mechanisms originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 238, 4.9.2012, p. 5).

5.9.2017

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

1

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---