alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017218EN.01001601.xml

| 7.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 218/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 218/16

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8429 — BNP Paribas/Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations/Société Générale/Euronext/Euroclear/S2IEM/CACEIS/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 218/05)

On 30 June 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8429. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8429. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 3.2.2




                                  Bylaws Section 2.2
                                  as amended in 1997


Section 2.2. Number. The number of directors of the corporation shall not be
less than four (4) no more than seven (7) until changed by amendment of the
Articles of Incorporation or by a Bylaw amending this Section 2.2 duly adopted
by the vote or written consent of holders of a majority of the outstanding
shares. The exact number of directors may be fixed from time to time, within the
limits specified in the Articles of Incorporation or in this Section 2.2, by (i)
a bylaw or amendment thereof duly adopted by the vote of a majority of the
shares entitled to vote represented at a duly held meeting at which a quorum is
present, or by the written consent of the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares entitled to vote, or by the Board of Directors, or (ii)
resolution of the Board of Directors.
No. 09-9304.

#### Israel Carmenate, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1044, 130 S. Ct. 2080,

176 L. Ed. 2d 427,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2869.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 344 Fed. Appx. 941.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**     I, Frank T. Sample, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Visicu, Inc. on Form10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained insuch Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Visicu, Inc.        Dated: November 13, 2007 By:  /s/ Frank T. Sample    Frank T. Sample    President, Chief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board of Directors
Exhbiit 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Victor Hamilton, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of TCI Solutions, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the period presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 18, 2005

 

/s/ Victor Hamilton

Victor Hamilton

Acting Chief Executive Office
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| April 5, 2010

  | By: /s/ | Ewout L. Steenbergen                                                                                                         |   |
|---------------------------------|--------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| (Date)

                   |         | Ewout L. Steenbergen

Executive Vice President and 

Chief Financial Officer

  |   |

----
IB 

Union Calendar No. 233 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4912 

[Report No. 109–424] 

To amend section 242 of the National Housing Act to extend the exemption 

for critical access hospitals under the FHA program for mortgage insurance for hospitals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2006 

Mr. NEY (for himself, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Ms. WATERS, Mr. DAVIS

of Alabama, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, and Mr. RENZI) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

APRIL 25, 2006 

Additional sponsor: Mr. HINOJOSA

APRIL 25, 2006 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To amend section 242 of the National Housing Act to extend 

the exemption for critical access hospitals under the 

FHA program for mortgage insurance for hospitals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4912 RH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Health Care 

3 Capital Access Act of 2006’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION. 

5 Paragraph (1) of section 242(i) of the National 

6 Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715z–7(i)(1)) is amended by 

7 striking ‘‘July 31, 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘July 31, 2011’’. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS

rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 233 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4912 

[Report No. 109

–424] 

A BILL 

To amend section 242 of the National Housing Act 

surance for hospitals. pitals under the FHA program for mortgage into extend the exemption for critical access hosAPRIL 25, 2006 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

June 2, 2022

Contact: Tara Tadlock

(202) 694-7176

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND 

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFTY BOARD 

FINALIZE DOCUMENT IMPLEMENTING MOU

Washington, DC—On June 1, 2022, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the 

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) completed a supplementary

document to the memorandum of understanding (MOU) that Deputy Secretary of 

Energy David Turk and Chair Joyce Connery signed on February 17, 2022. 

The objective of the signed MOU was to provide overall direction to improve 

cooperation between the agencies and provide a foundation for mutual 

communication, transparency, and information sharing between DOE and DNSFB. 

Building upon this, DOE and DNFSB career leaders finalized a supplementary 

document to implement the MOU between the agencies, which was signed this 

morning by DNFSB Technical Director Christopher Roscetti and Department of 

Energy Departmental Representative Joe Olencz. 

The DNFSB is an independent federal agency responsible for providing 

independent analysis, advice, and recommendations to the Secretary of Energy, 

related to adequate protection of public health and safety at DOE’s defense nuclear 

facilities, including with respect to the health and safety of employees and 

contractors at such facilities. 
DNFSB Technical Director Christopher Roscetti and Departmental

Representative Joe Olencz signed the supplementary document on June 1, 2022
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alion Science and Technology Corporation (the“Corporation”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John M. Hughes, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.Date: August 14, 2007       /s/ John M. HughesName: John M. Hughes    Title: Chief Financial Officer
# C_2017252EN.01000102.xml

| 3.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8509 — LVMH/Marcolin/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 252/02)

On 27 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8509. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8509. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      42,799,122
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,469,304
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (75,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,265,144
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            56,059,363
<PP&E>                                       5,807,139
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,683,973)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              60,746,527
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,114,764
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,594
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,809,902
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                60,746,527
<SALES>                                     33,273,890
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,273,890
<CGS>                                       14,819,043
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,819,043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,226,440
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,722
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,792,962
<INCOME-TAX>                               (4,043,405)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,749,557
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,749,557
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66


</TABLE>
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

OFFI@b\loBiJ33$ME@©L station

STATE OF TEXAS

PENALTY FOR

PRIVATE USE

CO

, o o,

5/6/2015 flJ-: , . <

Nguyen, Ky Cao Tr. Ct. Nor C-4-010402;0808407-C

The Court has dismissed without written order'this subsequent application for a writ

of habeas corpus. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC; Art 11.07, Sec. 4(a)-(c).

Abel Acosta, Clerk

KYCAO

2803 ATRI

GRAND P

UYEN

MDR

IRIE, TX 75052

WJ. k)STAGE»PITNEY BOWES

ZIP 78701

02 m

0001401623 MAY. 2015

WR-54,928-03

JEBM3B 75052

.|ll,i.HHI|,|n|lll..|ll|||l,,||l||l|.l.l,l...,.ll1|1|,||l,l||
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 15-0386 

Focus Ready Draft 4/23/2015

 

ENGINEER: Hall \ DDB 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 °C (OECDC 

 

 

SAT (concerns) (04/14/2015):
Analogs: 

Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: 

Migration to groundwater: Slow 

PBT rating: P1B1T2 

Health: 1-2 Dermal, Inhalation 

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 6 ppb) 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3C

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: 

Generated by the 09/30/2013 version of ChemSTEER. 

 
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 15-0386 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 15-0386
No. 09-8827.

#### Minh Phouc Chung, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

559 U.S. 1040, 130 S. Ct. 2084,

176 L. Ed. 2d 420,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2922.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
The Intelligence Community will:

1. Provide appropriate transparency to enhance public

understanding about:

a. the IC's mission and what the IC does to accomplish it
(including its structure and effectiveness);

b. the laws, directives, authorities, and policies that govern
the IC's activities; and

c. the compliance and oversight framework that ensures
intelligence activities are conducted in accordance with
applicable rules.

PRINCIPLES
OF 2. Be proactive and clear in making information publicly
INTELLIGENCE available through authorized channels, including taking
TRANSPARENCY affirmative steps to:
FOR THE a. provide timely transparency on matters of public interest;
b. prepare information with sufficient clarity and context, so
INTELLIGENCE that it is readily understandable:
COMMUNITY

c. make information accessible to the public through a range
of communications channels, such as those enabled by
new technology;

d. engage with stakeholders to better explain information
and to understand diverse perspectives; and

e. in appropriate circumstances, describe why information
cannot be made public.

The Principles of Intelligence
Transparency for the I[ntelli-
gence Community (IC) are in-
tended to facilitate IC decisions
on making information pub-
licly available in a manner that
enhances public understanding
of intelligence activities, while
continuing to protect informa-
tion when disclosure would

3. In protecting information about intelligence sources,
methods, and activities from unauthorized disclosure, ensure
that IC professionals consistently and diligently execute
their responsibilities to:

a. Classify only that information which, if disclosed without

harm national security. These
Principles do not modify or su-
persede applicable laws, execu-
tive orders, and directives, in-
cluding Executive Order 13526,
Classified National Security
Information. Instead, they ar-
ticulate the general norms that
elements of the IC should
follow in implementing those
authorities and requirements.

authorization, could be expected to cause identifiable or
describable damage to the national security;

. never classify information to conceal violations of law,
inefficiency, or administrative error, or to prevent
embarrassment;

. distinguish, through portion marking and similar means,
classified and unclassified information; and

. consider the public interest to the maximum extent
feasible when making classification determinations, while
continuing to protect information as necessary to
maintain intelligence effectiveness, protect the safety of
those who work for or with the IC, or otherwise protect
national security.

4. Align IC roles, resources, processes, and policies to support

robust implementation of these principles, consistent with
applicable laws, executive orders, and directives.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of Desert Hawk Gold Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned principal executive and financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:  August 11, 2011
 
 /s/ Robert E. JorgensenRobert E. Jorgensen, President(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT

HELENA,MONTANA 59620-3003 Supreme Court No. DA 20-0150 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JENNIFER GRUCE,

Respondent and Appellant. 

# FILED MAY 0 4 2020 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana GRANT OF EXTENSION

Pursuant to authority granted under M.R. App.P. 26(1), Appellant is given an extension of time until June 3, 2020, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant's brief. DATED this May 4, 2020

c: Carl B. Jensen, Timothy Charles Fox,Terryl T. Matt Bowen Greenwood Clerk ofthe Supreme Court

PO BOX 203003 •

HELENA MT •

59620-3003 •

TELEPHONE:(406)444-3858 •FAX:(406)444-5705 05/04/2020
Case Number: DA 20-0150
No. 09-8279.

#### Hernaldo Beltran, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 952, 130 S. Ct. 1539,

176 L. Ed. 2d 134,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1274.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-19-00094-CR

KORY ALLEN BATTIEST, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 6th District Court

Lamar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 28050

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Court reporter Terry Spangler recorded the trial court proceedings in appellate cause 

number 06-19-00094-CR, styled Kory Allen Battiest v. The State of Texas, trial court cause number 

28050 in the 6th Judicial District Court of Lamar County, Texas. The reporter’s record was 

originally due June 24, 2019. The record has not been filed, and Spangler has not requested an

extension of the filing deadline, even after receiving email correspondence from this Court 

inquiring about the status of the record. 

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure establish that “trial and appellate courts are jointly 

responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c). The 

Rules further instruct that an “appellate court may enter any order necessary to ensure the timely 

filing of the appellate record.” Id. In furtherance of our responsibilities established by the Rules, 

we find we must take steps to ensure that the record in this case is filed in a reasonable amount of 

time.

Therefore, we order Spangler to file the reporter’s record in cause number 06-19-00094-

CR, styled Kory Allen Battiest v. The State of Texas, trial court cause number 28050 in the 6th 

Judicial District Court of Lamar County, Texas, to be received no later than July 24, 2019.

If the reporter’s record is not received by July 24, we warn Spangler that we may begin 

contempt proceedings and order her to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of this 

Court for failing to obey its order.
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: July 3, 2019