alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017350EN.01000102.xml

| 18.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 350/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 350/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8287 — Nordic Capital/Intrum Justitia)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 350/02)

On 12 June 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8287. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8287. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Amendment No. 4 to Employment Agreement between Comcast Corp & Brian L. Roberts



 Exhibit 10.25 
 AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This
AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is entered into as of the 31st day of December, 2010, is between COMCAST CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation (together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”), and BRIAN L. ROBERTS (“Employee”). 

BACKGROUND 

WHEREAS, the parties entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2005, as amended (the “Agreement”), that
sets forth the terms and conditions of Employee’s employment with the Company, and 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to
further amend the Agreement on the terms and conditions contained herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, intending to be
legally bound hereby, agree as follows: 
 1. Subparagraph 5(b) of the Agreement is hereby amended to add the following year and
amount thereto: “Year – 2011; Amount - $3,150,000.” 
 2. Except as modified hereby, the Agreement shall continue
unmodified and in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Second
Amendment as of the date first-above written. 
  

			
	COMCAST CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	       /s/ Arthur R. Block

	
	EMPLOYEE:
	
	              /s/ Brian L.
Roberts

	Brian L. Roberts
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 44 (Monday, March 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10117-10118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4862]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11673 and <greek-i>11674]


 Oregon Disaster <greek-i>OR-00028

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Oregon.
    Incident: Severe Winter Storm, Flooding and Landslides.

[[Page 10118]]

    Incident Period: 01/01/2009 through 01/04/2009.
    Effective Date: 03/03/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/04/2009.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/03/2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: M. Mitravich, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:
Primary Counties: Clackamas.
Contiguous Counties:
    Oregon: Hood River, Marion, Multnomah, Wasco, Washington, Yamhill.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere....................     5.375
Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere.................     2.687
Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere....................     7.750
Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit        4.000
 Available Elsewhere..........................................
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit             4.500
 Available Elsewhere..........................................
Businesses And Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere..........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11673 B 
and for economic injury is 11674 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> are Oregon.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: March 3, 2009.
Darryl K. Hairston,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9-4862 Filed 3-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UN TIL TIME EXPIRES TO F IL E MOTION FOR REHEARIN G AND DISPOSITIO N THEREO F I F FILED C.B. , MOTHER OF S.B. AND S.B., CHILDREN,
A ppellant , v. Cas e No

. 5D 21- 3170 LT Ca se No. 2 0 20

- DP

- 15 DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed August 2 6, 2 022 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County , Stephen E. T oner, Jr. , J udge. Crystal B aez, B rooks ville, pro se. Rachel Batten, of Children’s Legal Services, B rooksville , fo r A ppellee

. Sara Elizabeth G oldfarb , Statewide Director of A ppeals , a nd A manda Vic toria G lass, Senior A ttorney, of Statewide G uardian ad Litem O ffic e, Tallahassee , for Guardian ad Litem

. PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, WALLIS and E ISNAUGLE , J J ., conc ur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amincor, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended  September 30, 2010 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on November 24, 2010 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.


Date: November 30, 2010                 /s/ Robert L. Olson
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert L. Olson, Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-9104.

#### Jimmie Vance Grubbs, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1022, 130 S. Ct. 1923,

176 L. Ed. 2d 392,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2476.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 585 F.3d 793.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000835541
<NAME> SOLECTRON CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-30-1997
<CASH>                                         225,073
<SECURITIES>                                   257,829
<RECEIVABLES>                                  422,731
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,049
<INVENTORY>                                    494,622
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,475,632
<PP&E>                                         648,777
<DEPRECIATION>                                 322,416
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,852,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          543,942
<BONDS>                                        385,850
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           115
<OTHER-SE>                                     918,954
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,852,419
<SALES>                                      3,694,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,694,385
<CGS>                                        3,266,106
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,266,106
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               189,538
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,319
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,551
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                238,407
<INCOME-TAX>                                    80,348
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            158,059
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   158,059
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.36
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oxford Ventures, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB/A for the Quarter  ending  September  30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Daniel
K.  Leonard,  President,  CFO and CEO of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



Date : November 12, 2004

/s/ Daniel K. Leonard
---------------------
   Daniel K. Leonard
   President and CFO
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-4616

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL HARRIOT, a/k/a Lanky, a/k/a Donovan Smith, a/k/a Richard Onyett, 

a/k/a Bernard Barber, a/k/a James D. Smith, a/k/a Michael Smith,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (3:99-cr-00341-MBS-3)

Submitted: December 20, 2022 Decided: January 13, 2023

Before WILKINSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: G. Wells Dickson, Jr., WELLS DICKSON, PA, Kingstree, South Carolina, 

for Appellant. Adair F. Boroughs, United States Attorney, Elliott B. Daniels, Assistant 

U.S. Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South 

Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-4616 Doc: 35 Filed: 01/13/2023 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Harriot appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for a reduced 

sentence under Section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 

5194. While Harriot primarily requested a sentence of time served, his counsel argued in 

the alternative for a downward variance based on the disparity between the powder and 

crack cocaine Sentencing Guidelines, and counsel proposed an advisory Guidelines range 

of 360 months to life imprisonment to account for the disparity. The district court declined 

to reduce Harriot’s sentence to time served, but granted him a variance, adopted counsel’s 

proposed Guidelines range, and reduced Harriot’s sentence to 360 months’ imprisonment. 

On appeal, Harriot contends that the district court erred in calculating his Guidelines range.

We review for abuse of discretion a district court’s decision of whether to grant a 

reduction under the First Step Act. United States v. Jackson, 952 F.3d 492, 497 (4th Cir. 

2020). However, “the invited error doctrine recognizes that a court cannot be asked by 

counsel to take a step in a case and later be convicted of error, because it has complied with 

such request.” United States v. Hasson, 26 F.4th 610, 621 n.4 (4th Cir.) (cleaned up), cert. 

denied, 143 S. Ct. 310 (2022). Because the district court adopted Harriot’s alternative 

argument and proposed Guidelines range, the invited error doctrine applies and he has thus 

waived the argument he seeks to advance on appeal. See United States v. Shea, 989 F.3d 

271, 282 (4th Cir. 2021).

USCA4 Appeal: 21-4616 Doc: 35 Filed: 01/13/2023 Pg: 2 of 3
3

Therefore, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-4616 Doc: 35 Filed: 01/13/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Joning Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending May 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, John O. Jones, Jr. Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


October 21, 2004


/s/  John O Jones, Jr.
-----------------------------
     John O. Jones, Jr.
     Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/RAYMOND J. WILSONRaymond J. Wilson Chief Executive
Officer and DirectorDecember 12, 2007 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/JAMES J. REILLYJames J. Reilly Chief Financial OfficerDecember 12, 2007                  |  | 

---



QuickLinks
1

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 10-499V

Filed: February 8, 2013

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

JOSE MONTOYA, *

*

Petitioner, *

v. * Stipulation; Influenza;

* Guillain-Barré Syndrome

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Isaiah R. Kalinowski, Esq., Maglio Christopher & Toale, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner.

Lynn E. Ricciardella, Esq., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

Vowell, Special Master:

Jose Montoya [“petitioner”] filed a petition for compensation under the National 

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program2on August 2, 2010. Petitioner alleges that he 

developed Guillain-Barré syndrome [“GBS”] as a result of an influenza [“flu”] vaccination 

he received on or about October 10, 2007. See Stipulation, filed Feb. 7, 2013, at ¶¶ 2, 

4. Respondent denies that petitioner suffered GBS or any other injury caused by his 

receipt of the flu vaccine, and denies that his disabilities are sequelae of his alleged

injury. Id. at ¶ 6.

 

1

Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend 

to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 

U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), a party has 14 days to identify and 

move to delete medical or other information, that satisfies the criteria in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B). 

Further, consistent with the rule requirement, a motion for redaction must include a proposed redacted 

decision. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within the requirements of that provision, I 

will delete such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2006).
2

Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. On February 7, 2013, 

the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the 

settlement terms. Respondent agrees to pay petitioner:

A lump sum of $35,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Jose 

Montoya. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be 

available under § 15(a). 

The special master adopts the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and awards 

compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. In the absence of a 

motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed 

to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Denise K. Vowell 

Denise K. Vowell

Special Master

 

2

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice 

renouncing the right to seek review.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Earnest Taylor and Lisa Taylor d/b/a T & S Enterprises

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00 252

- CV

Trial court case number: 8 19 16

- CV

Trial court: 2 3 rd District Court of Brazoria County

On July 9 , 201 9 , this Court d ismissed re lators Earnest Taylor and Lisa Taylor d/b/a T & S Enterprises ’s petition for a writ of mandamus

. See In re Taylor , No. 01

- 1 9

- 00 252

- CV, 201 9 WL 2 932855 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] July 9, 201 9

, orig. proceeding ) (mem. op.)

. After we granted their motion for an extension , relators’ motion for rehearing was due on August 9, 2019

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.1

, 49.8. Relators have filed a second motion for an extension of time . The motion is granted.
Appellant’s motion for rehearing is due to be filed by September 19 , 2019

. No further extensions will be granted.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/ Russell Lloyd

_____  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ August 15, 2019

__
##### 



CAPCO  Financial
 SIXTH AMENDMENT
TO
CONTRACT OF SALE  SECURITY AGREEMENT
  RECITALS




---



##### 



XRG, INC.
    
    
    
    XRG LOGISTICS, INC.By:
    
    
    
    
    
    By:Title:
    
    
    
    
    
    Title:EXPRESS FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC.
    
    
    
    R&R EXPRESS INTERMODAL, INC.By:
    
    
    
    
    
    By:Title:
    
    
    
    
    
    Title:CAPCO FINANCIAL COMPANY, adivision of Greater Bay Bank N.A.By:Title:




---



##### 



RIDER TO ASSIGNMENT OF DEPOSIT ACCOUNT




---



##### 



CAPCO FINANCIAL COMPANY, a
    
    BARRON PARTNERS, LPdivision of Greater Bay Bank, N.A.By:
    
    Barron Capital Advisors, LLC, itsgeneral partnerBy:
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    By:Name:
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Andrew Barron Worden,Title:
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Managing Member




---



##### 



Re: CAPCO Financial Company, a division of Greater Bay Bank N.A.
   1.
    
    All representations and warranties of the undersigned set forth in the Contract of Sale -
Security Agreement, as amended, are incorporated herein by this reference and confirmed to be
true and correct as of the date hereof.
 2.
    
    No Event of Default has occurred under the Contract of Sale  Security Agreement and no event
with notice and/or the passage of time has occurred that would constitute an Event of Default
as of the date hereof.
 3.
    
    The undersigned shall pay to Barron Partners, LP, concurrently herewith and on the first day
of each February, May, August and November hereafter that the Pledged CD shall be outstanding
an amount equal to 2.25% of the face amount of the Pledged CD ($4,500.00).
 4.
    
    The undersigned shall promptly deliver to Barron Partners, LP copies of any and all notices
received from CAPCO Financial Company under the Contract of Sale  Security Agreement.
 5.
    
    This Letter Agreement shall be interpreted in the occurrence with the laws with the State of
New York.




---



##### 



6.
    
    This Letter Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which will be
deemed .an original and together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
 Respectfully submitted,XRG, Inc.By:Its:XRG Logistics, Inc.By:Its:Express Freight Systems, Inc.By:Its:R&R Express Intermodal, Inc.By:Its:
No. 09-9695.

#### Lynn E. Scott, Petitioner v. Kevin Milyard, Warden.

560 U.S. 911, 130 S. Ct. 3291,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1196,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3949.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 350 Fed. Appx. 213.