alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5117 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5117

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
    To exempt persons with disabilities from the prohibition against 
       providing section 8 rental assistance to college students.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES FROM SECTION 8 RENTAL 
              ASSISTANCE PROHIBITION.

    Subsection (a) of section 327 of Public Law 109-115 (119 Stat. 
2466) is amended--
        (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ``and'' at the end;
        (2) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (7); and
        (3) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following new 
    paragraph:
        ``(6) is not a person with disabilities, as such term is 
    defined in section 3(b)(3)(E) of the United States Housing Act of 
    1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437a(b)(3)(E)) and was not receiving assistance 
    under such section 8 as of November 30, 2005; and''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Opinion issued August 21, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00292-CV

———————————

IN RE BRANDY BRENAY CHARLES AND PROPHET RONALD

DWAYNE WHITFIELD, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators, Brandy Brenay Charles and Prophet Ronald Dwayne Whitfield, filed 

a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus challenging the denial of their right to be 

heard to present their defense in the underlying termination proceeding, seeking to 

compel the respondent district judge to give them a trial by jury, and to be heard on 

all motions, including the withdrawal of their trial counsel and appointment of new 
2

counsel.

1

 Generally, to be entitled to mandamus relief, relators must establish that 

the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an adequate remedy by 

appeal. See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) 

(orig. proceeding). The relators bear the burden of proving both of these two 

requirements. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex. 1992).

On July 11, 2018, a clerk’s record was filed in this Court containing, among 

other documents, pro se original and amended and supplemental notices of appeal 

and relator Charles’s first amended notice of appeal, filed by counsel from the final 

decree for termination, signed by the respondent on May 3, 2018. This Court takes 

judicial notice that relators’ notices of appeal have been assigned by the Clerk of this 

Court to appellate cause number 01-18-00485-CV, for which relators have been 

appointed counsel. See In re Chaumette, 456 S.W.3d 299, 303 n.2 (Tex. App.—

Houston [1st Dist.] 2014, orig. proceeding) (noting appellate court may take judicial 

notice of its own records in related proceeding involving same parties).

Thus, because relators have filed a notice of appeal of the final decree for 

termination, which remains pending under appellate cause number 01-18-00485-

CV, they have an adequate appellate remedy to challenge the denial of their right to 

be heard to present their defense. See Walker, 827 S.W.2d at 840 (mandamus relief 

 

1 The underlying case is In the Interest of K.L.W., A Child, Cause No. 2017-02559J,

in the 314th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable John Phillips

presiding.
3

is not available when adequate appellate remedy exists); see also In re Esparza, No. 

14–16–00748–CV, 2016 WL 5947445, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 

13, 2016, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op.) (citations omitted) (“Except in 

unusual circumstances, not applicable here, mandamus relief is not available after a 

final judgment has been issued because relator then has an adequate remedy by direct 

appeal.”).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus because relators have 

an adequate appellate remedy. We dismiss all pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Massengale.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5083 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5083

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide equity between active 
and reserve component members of the Armed Forces in the computation of 
         disability retired pay for members wounded in action.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2006

   Mr. Davis of Kentucky (for himself, Mr. Boustany, and Mr. Israel) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide equity between active 
and reserve component members of the Armed Forces in the computation of 
         disability retired pay for members wounded in action.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Staff Sergeant Carlos Farler Citizen 
Soldier Equality Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. EQUITY IN COMPUTATION OF DISABILITY RETIRED PAY FOR RESERVE 
              COMPONENT MEMBERS WOUNDED IN ACTION.

    Section 1208(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new sentence: ``However, in the case of 
such a member who is retired under this chapter, or whose name is 
placed on the temporary disability retired list under this chapter, 
because of a disability incurred after the date of the enactment of 
this sentence for which the member is awarded the Purple Heart, the 
member shall be credited, for the purposes of this chapter, with the 
number of years of service that would be counted if computing the 
member's years of service under section 12732 of this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
H. R. 5108

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and six 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1213 East 

Houston Street in Cleveland, Texas, as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Robert A. Martinez 

Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL ROBERT A. MARTINEZ POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 1213 East Houston Street in Cleveland, Texas, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Robert 

A. Martinez Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Lance Corporal Robert A. Martinez Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
No. 09-8795.

#### Issac Jermaine Brown, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 986, 130 S. Ct. 1724,

176 L. Ed. 2d 203,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1918.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

*204Same case below, 333 Fed. Appx. 754.
No. 09-9621.

#### Anthony Lamonte Pace, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1082, 130 S. Ct. 2126,

176 L. Ed. 2d 748,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3137.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 356 Fed. Appx. 656.
No. 09-8402.

#### In re Charles Willy Alpine, Petitioner.

559 U.S. 990, 130 S. Ct. 1744,

176 L. Ed. 2d 223,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2272.

March 8, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Mandatory Reporting of

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Farm, Ranch, and Rural Communities 

Federal Advisory Committee

March 13, 2008
2

Outline

• Appropriations Language

• Purpose and Scope

• U.S. 2005 GHG Emissions

• Rulemaking Timeline 
3

Appropriations Language

FY2008 Consolidated Appropriations Amendment:

• “... not less than $3,500,000 shall be provided for activities to develop 

and publish a draft rule not later than 9 months after the date of 

enactment of this Act, and a final rule not later than 18 months after the 

date of enactment of this Act, to require mandatory reporting of 

greenhouse gas emissions above appropriate thresholds in all sectors of 

the economy...”

Accompanying Explanatory Statement:

• The Agency shall "use its existing authority under the Clean Air Act" to 

develop a mandatory GHG reporting rule. "The Agency is further 

directed to include in its rule reporting of emissions resulting from 

upstream production and downstream sources, to the extent that the 

Administrator deems it appropriate. The Administrator shall determine 

appropriate thresholds of emissions above which reporting is required, 

and how frequently reports shall be submitted to EPA. The Administrator 

shall have discretion to use existing reporting requirements for electric 

generating units under Section 821 of the Clean Air Act...."
4

Purpose and Scope

Objective(s) of the Program – to provide data that will inform and support 

development of national climate policy

Scope of Coverage provided by Congress

– Both upstream and downstream 

• Upstream: Fuel and Chemical producers/importers (e.g., oil refineries, 

natural gas processors, HFC producers)

• Downstream: GHG emitters (e.g., power plants, iron and steel plants, cement 

manufacturers

Methods

– Will build on methods from existing mandatory and voluntary reporting 

systems 

• Federal reporting programs- e.g., NEI, Acid Rain Program, Climate Leaders, 

1605(b), National Greenhouse Gas Inventory

• State Programs- e.g., California, The Climate Registry, RGGI, other state programs

• Corporate Programs- e.g., WRI/WBCSD

• Industry Protocols- e.g., API Compendium, CSI Protocol (cement), International 

Aluminum Institute
5

U.S. 2005 GHG Emissions
6

Timeline and Process

January 2008-

September 2008

Establish EPA workgroup, develop 

rule and supporting analyses, 

stakeholder outreach, inter- and intraAgency review

September 2008 Proposal 

October 2008 –

June 2009

Public comment period and 

hearings, review stakeholder 

comments, develop final rule and 

supporting analyses, inter- and 

intra- Agency review

June 2009 Final Rule
No. 09-8757.

#### David Edward Giles, Petitioner v. Ron Van Boening, Superintendent, McNeil Island Corrections Center.

559 U.S. 997, 130 S. Ct. 1749,

176 L. Ed. 2d 221,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2320.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Bernhard Hampl, Ph.D., certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Eon Labs, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)             designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)             disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

a)             all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)            any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: August 9, 2004

 
| /s/ Bernhard  Hampl, Ph.D. |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Bernhard  Hampl, Ph.D.     |
| Chief  Executive Officer   |

 

1

----
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Hamilton, Rabinovitz & Associates, Inc.

Hamilton, Rabinovitz &
Associates (HR&A) consents to being named in Trane Inc.s Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007 in the form and context in which HR&A is named and to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 pertaining to the 2002 Omnibus Incentive Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Registration No. 333-96547), Form S-3 pertaining to the registration of $1.0 billion of debt securities (Registration
No. 333-67943), Form S-8 pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Registration No. 333-40575), Form S-8 pertaining to the Deferred Compensation Plan (Registration No. 333-75492), Form S-8 pertaining to the Supplemental
Compensation Plan for Outside Directors (Registration No. 333-109562), Form S-8 pertaining to the Stock Incentive Plan (Registration Nos. 333-65252 and 033-63007 and Form S-4 of Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited pertaining to the registration of
shares of Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited to be issued in its acquisition of Trane Inc. and the related proxy statement/prospectus included therein.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ Francine F.
Rabinovitz             
|Hamilton, Rabinovitz & Associates, Inc.

February 18, 2008
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF LINDSAY MANUFACTURING CO.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          Ownership
                                                                          Percentage
                                                                          ----------
<S>                                                                       <C>
Lindsay International Sales Corporation - Delaware                           100%

Lindsay Transportation, Inc. - Nebraska                                      100%

Lindsay Foreign Sales Corporation - Virgin Islands (Inactive)                100%

Lindsay - Irrigation Pty., Ltd. - Australia (Inactive)                       100%

Lindsay Europe SA - France                                                   100%

Irrigation Specialists, Inc. - Delaware                                      100%

Lindsay America do Sul Ltda. - Brazil                                        100%

Lindsay Manufacturing Africa - South Africa                                  100%

LMC Professional Supply, Inc. - Delaware (Inactive)                          100%
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

     Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 1350

     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Dover
Petroleum Corp. (the "Company")for the quarter ending September 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Date: January 15, 2004             /s/ Robert Salna


                                   Robert Salna, Principal Executive
                                   Officer



     The foregoing certification accompanied the Quarterly Report on
Form 10QSB filing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is being
reproduced herein for information only.  It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company, whether made before or after hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.  A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained b y the
Company and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Todd P. Headley, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Sourcefire, Inc. for the period ended September30, 2007;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:               a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;               b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and               c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):               a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and               b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: November 6, 2007 By: /s/ Todd P. Headley            Name:
No. 09-8909.

#### Christopher L. Temple, Petitioner v. Wendy Warmer, Warden.

559 U.S. 1094, 130 S. Ct. 2373,

176 L. Ed. 2d 771,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3607.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 5, 2018

p1128

Order 

Clerk

December 5, 2018

157905

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 157905

COA: 336183

Grand Traverse CC: 

2016-012495-FH

MICHAEL GARY COHEN,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 17, 2018 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.