alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1





GOLUB CAPITAL BDC 3, INC.





PRIVACY POLICY





To Golub Capital BDC 3, Inc. Investors:





We take precautions to maintain the privacy of personal information concerning our investors. These precautions include the adoption of certain procedures designed to maintain and secure your nonpublic personal information from inappropriate disclosure to unaffiliated third parties. We are sending this notice in accordance with applicable federal regulations. This notice applies to investors in Golub Capital BDC 3, Inc. (the “Company”).





What kind of personal information do we have about you and where did we get it?





We collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources:





|  |                                                                                                        
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | Information we may receive from you in subscription agreements or other related documents or forms; and

|  |                                                                
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|• | Information about your transactions with our affiliates and us.




How do we protect your personal information?





We do not disclose any nonpublic personal information about our investors or former investors to anyone, except as permitted by law.





We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees and agents of GC Advisors LLC, its affiliates and unaffiliated third party service providers (which may include a custodian, transfer agent or financial printer) who need to know that information in order to provide services to you or to the Company. In that regard, we note that we maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to safeguard your nonpublic personal information and which we believe is adequate to prevent unauthorized disclosure of such information.





What do we do with personal information about our former investors?





If an investor decides to no longer do business with us, we will continue to follow this privacy policy with respect to the information we have in our possession about such investor and his/her account.





If you have any questions concerning our privacy policies, please contact our Chief Financial Officer, Ross Teune, at (312) 284-0111.
No. 09-9046.

#### Todd Darrell Ballard, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.

559 U.S. 1074, 130 S. Ct. 2102,

176 L. Ed. 2d 733,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3423.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Office, denied.

Same case below, 976 A.2d 1198.
No. 09-9160.

#### Miguel Angel Sanchez, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1023, 130 S. Ct. 1926,

176 L. Ed. 2d 394,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2430.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 586 F.3d 918.
# C_2017331EN.01000201.xml

| 3.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8576 — Balder/Varma/Serena)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 331/03)

On 19 September 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8576. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8576. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In
connection with the Annual Report of American Power Conversion Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald M. Muir, Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|March 15, 2004                                                                                                 | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/DONALD M. MUIRDonald M. Muir Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration, and Chief Financial
Officer | 

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate disclosure document.

79

---

QuickLinks
No. 09-8312.

#### Robert Lee Williams, Jr., Petitioner v. Arkansas.

559 U.S. 980, 130 S. Ct. 1706,

176 L. Ed. 2d 194,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2116.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas denied.

Same case below, 2009 Ark. 433, 373 S.W.3d 237.
EXHIBIT 12.3


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
        RULE 13A-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

     I, Moshe Reuveni, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Healthcare
Technologies Ltd.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
exchange act rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
     material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
     prepared;

          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
     and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
     the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting.

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

<PAGE>


     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

Date:  June 28, 2006

                                                     /s/ Moshe Reuveni
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Moshe Reuveni
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6871

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DANQUAN A. FANNING,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:16-cr-00257-CMC-1; 

3:20-cv-03523-CMC)

Submitted: September 9, 2021 Decided: September 14, 2021

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danquan A. Fanning, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Danquan A. Fanning seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See Whiteside v. United States, 775 F.3d 180, 182-83 (4th 

Cir. 2014) (en banc) (explaining that § 2255 motions are subject to one-year statute of 

limitations, running from latest of four commencement dates enumerated in 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2255(f)). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate 

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability will not issue 

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that 

the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. 

Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Fanning has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert D. McDougal, Chief Financial Officer of Ireland Inc.
(the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007, and to which this
      certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                              



| | By:    | /s/
      Robert D. McDougal
| | ------ | ----------------------------
| |        |                             
| | Name:  | ROBERT D. McDOUGAL          
| |        |                             
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer     
| |        |                             
| | Date:  | November 13, 2007           





A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
No. 09-7579.

#### Mario Lou Meza, Petitioner v. California.

559 U.S. 1071, 130 S. Ct. 2091,

176 L. Ed. 2d 728,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3427.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



Patriot Scientific Corporation
San Diego, California



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed
Registration Statements (No. 333-36418, No. 333-57602 and No. 333-81156) of
Patriot Scientific Corporation of our report dated July 19, 2002, except for
note 1 dated as of August 23, 2002 relating to the consolidated financial
statements of Patriot Scientific Corporation, appearing in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2002. Our report contained an
explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern.


/s/  Nation Smith Hermes Diamond


San Diego, California
August 23, 2002
No. 09-7670.

#### Russell Dale Mortland, Petitioner v. Texas.

559 U.S. 1088, 130 S. Ct. 2143,

176 L. Ed. 2d 760,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3134.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

*761Former decision, 559 U.S. 908, 130 S. Ct. 1289, 175 L. Ed. 2d 1081, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 971.
No. 09-9784.

#### Travis S. Hester, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1087, 130 S. Ct. 2137,

176 L. Ed. 2d 757,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3127.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 589 F.3d 86.
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of Lindsay Manufacturing Co.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-00769 and No. 333-87806) on Forms S-8 of Lindsay Manufacturing Co. of our
reports dated November 3, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets
of Lindsay Manufacturing Co. and subsidiaries as of August 31, 2005 and 2004,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended August 31, 2005, and related financial statement schedule,
management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of August 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of August 31, 2005, which reports appear in the August
31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Lindsay Manufacturing Co.


                                        /s/ KPMG LLP

Omaha, Nebraska
November 4, 2005


                                       60
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. §1350

In
connection with the quarterly report of Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, William B. Olson, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.

Date:
March 18, 2011



/S/ WILLIAM B. OLSONWilliam B. OlsonChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
FIRST AMENDMENT
TO OPERATING AGREEMENT


 


This
First Amendment
(this “Amendment”)
to the June
27, 2011 Operating
Agreement
(“Agreement”)
is entered into
effective as
of April 3,
2012 (“Effective
Date”), by
and between
INDEPENDENCE
DRILLING, LLC,
a Nevada
limited
liability
company
(“Independence”),
DESERT
DISCOVERIES,
LLC, a
Nevada limited
liability company
(“Desert Discoveries”), EDWARD
TRAUB, an
individual
(“Traub”),
and AMERICAN
LIBERTY PETROLEUM
CORP, a Nevada
corporation
formerly
known as Oreon
Rental Corporation
(“ALP”).
Independence,
Desert
Discoveries,
Traub and
ALP are at times
referred
to herein singly
as a “Party”
and collectively
as the
“Parties”.



 


		A.	The Parties
entered
into the Agreement
to jointly operate
certain
oil and gas Leases
and other described
rights
and interests.
		B.	The Parties
have agreed to amend
the Agreement
as provided
for in this Amendment.



		C.	Except
as otherwise
expressly
defined in this
Amendment,
capitalized terms used
herein shall
have the same
meaning as set
forth in the Agreement.



 


For
lawful consideration,
including
the mutual
covenants
and agreements
contained herein,
the receipt
and sufficiency
of which
are hereby
acknowledged
by the Parties,
the Parties
agree to
amend the Agreement
as follows:



 


1.   Exhibit
A.  The
Agreement's
Exhibit
A is hereby
amended
to include
an Item
1.f, which
hereby references
the 1760 acres
leased
under Bureau
of Land
Management
(“BLM”)
Lease NVN090504,
which covers
acreage
within Township
0130N, Range 0350E,
Meridian MDM, in
Nye County, Nevada, with working and net revenue interests
as set forth on the records with the BLM (namely: with regard to the working interests, ALP with
60%, Desert
Discoveries with
39%, and
Traub
with 1 %; and
with
regard to the net
revenue interests,
ALP with 50.7%,
Desert Discoveries
with 32.955,
and Traub with
.845). 


 


2.   Effect
of Amendment.  Except
as expressly
amended hereby,
all terms, covenants
and provisions
of the Agreement are
and shall
remain in full force
and effect,
and all, for
avoidance of
doubt, all references
therein to the
“Agreement”
shall henceforth refer
to the Agreement as
amended by this
Amendment.
This Amendment is
hereby deemed
incorporated into,
and made a part
of, the Agreement.



 


The
undersigned
have executed
this Amendment
as of the Effective
Date.



 


	INDEPENDENCE DRILLING, LLC	DESERT DISCOVERIES, LLC


 


	By:	/s/ Patrick Fagen	 	By:	/s/ Patrick Fagen	 
	Name:	Patrick Fagen	 	Name:	Patrick Fagen	 
	Title:	Manager	 	Title:	Manager, High Sierra Exploration,	 
	 	 	 	LLC, Manager of Desert Discovery, LLC	 


 


	EDWARD TRAUB	
        AMERICAN LIBERTY PETROLEUM

        CORP.



 


	/s/ Edward Traub	 	By:	/s/ Alvaro Vollmers	 
	 	 	Name:	Alvaro Vollmers	 
	 	 	Title:
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-12-0557

SAT Date: 12/21/2012

Print Date: 9/25/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: Analogs: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1-3 1-3 1

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: LUNG; NEURO; IRR; AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: 

FATE: Estimations for low weight 2-methylpentane MW 86 C6H14

log Kow = 3.21 (E) 

S = <0.001 to 1.8 mg/L at 25 C (E for component range), 14 mg/L at 25°C (M for low weight)

VP = <1.0E-6 to 168 torr at 25 C (NOMO5 for component range), 211 torr (M for low weight)

BP )

H = 1.71 (E)

log Koc = 2.04 (E)

log Fish BCF = 1.79 (E)

log Fish BAF = 2.03 (E) 
POTW removal (%) = 0-99 via sorption and stripping

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = da->mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = moderate - v.strong

Volatilization half-life from a standard river = 1 hrs

Volatilization half-life from a standard lake = 4 da

Atmospheric Oxidation Half-life = 24 hr via OH radical

PBT Potential: P1-3B1-3

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl - moderate

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption of the lower molecular weight components is 

expected to be good all routes. Concern for solvent neurotoxicity and irritation and for chemical 

pneumonia.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 65

daphnid 48-h LC50 37

green algal 96-h EC50 27

fish _ chronic value 6.4

daphnid _ chronic 

value

3.6

algal _ chronic 

value

7.2

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for neutral organic chemicals; 

SAR chemical class = hydrocarbon; MW 78 (representative structure); log Kow = 1.99 (EPI); 

liquid with mp unknown (P); S ≤ 1.8 g/L at 25 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 

100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; 

and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

360

SARs neutral organic chemicals

SAR Class hydrocarbon

Ecotox Category Neutral Organics

Ecotox Factors Comments: 
 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916