alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 504 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 504

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 4960 West Washington Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, as the 
                 ``Ray Charles Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2005

  Ms. Watson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 4960 West Washington Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, as the 
                 ``Ray Charles Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RAY CHARLES POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4960 West Washington Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Ray Charles Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ray 
Charles Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
406 P.2d 244

#### Arthur J. FRY, Appellant, v. Frank EYMAN, Warden Arizona State Prison, Appellee.

No. 2 CA-CIV 139.

Court of Appeals of Arizona.

Oct. 5, 1965.

Arthur J. Fry, in pro. per.

Darrell F. Smith, Atty. Gen., James S. Tegart, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for appellee.

KRUCKER, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Pinal County, denying a writ of habeas corpus.

We will refer to appellant, Arthur J. Fry, as defendant.

The defendant was duly tried in the Superior Court of Maricopa County on an information charging robbery and during the course of trial the information was amended charging first degree burglary, to which charge the defendant pleaded guilty. Appeal was duly taken to the Arizona Supreme Court (See State v. Fry, 95 Ariz. 68, 386 P.2d 794 (1963), and the Supreme Court of this State examined the entire record and affirmed the judgment of the Superior Court of Maricopa County. Defendant was at all times represented by counsel, both in the trial in the Superior Court of Maricopa County and in the appeal to the Supreme Court of Arizona.

We have examined the briefs and the record and find no new material therein, and it appears to this Court that this appeal is an effort to have this Court review the proceedings of the Superior Court of Maricopa County and review the opinion of the Supreme Court of Arizona. This we cannot do.

There being no merit whatsoever in this appeal and no new material brought before this Court, it is hereby ordered that the order of the Superior Court of Pinal County denying the writ of habeas corpus be affirmed and this appeal dismissed.

HATHAWAY and MOLLOY, JJ., concurring.
Montana Eleventh Judicial District Court. County of Flathead.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- SCOTT LEE DAVIS, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-98-068

DECISION

On May 26, 2016, the Defendant’s suspended sentence was revoked for violation of the conditions of his probation and he was sentenced to the Montana State Prison for a period of five (5) years, for the offense of Theft, a Felony, in violation of §45-6-301(7)(b), MCA (1998). This sentence was ordered to run concurrent to the sentence in DC-06-410 (2 years suspended), and consecutive to the sentences in DC-10-251(5yrs), DC-12-403 (15 years with 11 years suspended), and DC-13-282 (5 suspended). The Defendant was given credit for two hundred eighty (280) days served in custody pending final disposition in this matter.

On November 18, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant appeared by Vision Net from Crossroads Correctional Center and was represented by Brent Getty of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was represented by Flathead County Deputy Attorney Travis Ahner.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is *104clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

Done in open Court this 18th day of November, 2016.

DATED this 8th day of December, 2016.

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member.
ODNIHeader2




Print
  The Plain Writing Act of 2010 requires federal agencies to write “clear government communication that the public can understand and use.” President Obama also emphasized the importance of establishing “a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration” in his Jan. 21, 2009 Memorandum on Transparency and Open Government. The ODNI is committed to writing new documents in plain language using the Federal Plain Language Guidelines. This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.language efforts is Jeff A., chief of staff, Public Affairs. The ODNI is training our employees and have created an oversight process. We must use plain language in any document that Is necessary for obtaining any federal government benefit or service or filing taxes.
Provides information about any federal government benefit or service.
Explains to the public how to comply with a requirement that the federal government administers or enforces. Links Plain Language Website
Plain Language Law
-88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

32 34 36 38 40 42 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 06/08 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANDRE WARE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 231 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANDRE WARE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 232 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of February, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
No. 09-960.

#### William H. Hogan, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of Alaska Department of Health and Human Services, et al., Petitioners v. Kaltag Tribal Council, et al.

559 U.S. 1091, 130 S. Ct. 2397,

176 L. Ed. 2d 766,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3574.

April 26, 2010.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
No. 09-9437.

#### Samuel Quinn, Petitioner v. Illinois.

559 U.S. 1097, 130 S. Ct. 2385,

176 L. Ed. 2d 777,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3619.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 392 Ill. App. 3d 1131, 368 Ill. Dec. 484, 984 N.E.2d 209.
No. 09-1019.

#### Alan Mikell, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1038, 130 S. Ct. 2078,

176 L. Ed. 2d 416,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2791.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 344 Fed. Appx. 218.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alion Science and Technology Corporation (the“Corporation”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ending December 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John M. Hughes, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.Date: February 14, 2007       /s/John M. Hughes    Name: John M. Hughes    Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.1
  
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of The Bank of New York
Mellon Trust Company,  N.A., as Trustee on behalf of
Government  Trust 1-D (the  "Trust"), hereby certifies, to
his knowledge, that the Trust's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Trust.
  /s/ Lawrence M. Kusch
 -----------------------------
 Name:  
 Lawrence M. Kusch
 Title:    
 Vice President
 
 March 30, 2010
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATE
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18
U.S.C. 1350)
 
 The
undersigned, Michael J. Cunningham has executed this certificate in connection
with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s
report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 3, 2008 (the
“Report”).
 
 The
undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge:
 
 1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”);
and
 
 2. The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 9th
day of June 2008.
 
 /s/
      MICHAEL J. CUNNINGHAMMichael
      J. CunninghamExecutive
      Vice President — Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
 
 This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  28
No. 08-1458.

#### Missouri Gas Energy, Petitioner v. Monica Schmidt, Woods County, Oklahoma, Assessor.

559 U.S. 970, 130 S. Ct. 1685,

176 L. Ed. 2d 179,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2087,

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma denied.

Same case below, 234 P.3d 938.
No. 09-9131.

#### John M. Wyatt, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1117, 130 S. Ct. 2431,

176 L. Ed. 2d 945,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3745.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 1023, 130 S. Ct. 1925, 176 L. Ed. 2d 394, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 2448.
No. 09-9166.

#### Freddy Lee Slack, Petitioner v. Susan Jones, Warden, et al.

559 U.S. 1053, 130 S. Ct. 2352,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3044.

176 L. Ed. 2d 569,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 23.2

NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

On July 11, 2002, Mesaba Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") filed a Current Report on Form 8-K reporting that on July 11,
2002, the Company discontinued the engagement of Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") as its independent public accountant and engaged Deloitte & Touche LLP as new independent auditors for fiscal
2003. This Annual Report on Form 10-K, which includes the report of Andersen on the Company's consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2002, is incorporated by reference into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8, File Nos. 333-49138, 033-22977, 33-22977, and 33-89930, (collectively, the "Registration Statements").

After
reasonable efforts, the Company has been unable to obtain Andersen's consent to incorporate by reference into the Registration Statements its audit report with respect to the
financial statements of the Company as of March 31, 2002 and the three years then ended. Under these circumstances, Rule 437(a) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, permits the
Company to file this Form 10-K without such consent from Andersen. The absence of such consent may limit recovery by investors on certain claims, including the inability of
investors to assert claims against Andersen under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for any untrue statements of a material fact contained, or any omissions to state a
material fact required to be stated, in those audited financial statements. In addition, the ability of Andersen to satisfy any claims (including claims arising from Andersen's provision of auditing
and other services to the Company) may be limited as a practical matter due to Andersen ceasing operations.

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of Desert Hawk Gold Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned principal executive and financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:  May 23, 2011
 
 /s/ Robert E. JorgensenRobert E. Jorgensen, President(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.6

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the use of our report, dated January 14, 1998, except 
for Note 14 as to which the date is February 5, 1998, relating to the 
consolidated financial statements of Button Gwinnett Financial Corporation and 
subsidiary for the two years ended December 31, 1997, included in this Annual 
Report on Form 10-K and incorporated by reference in the previously filed 
Registration Statements of Premier Bancshares, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File Numbers 
333-29941, 333-60249 and 333-59475) and Form S-3D (File Number 333-60245).


                                    /s/ Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC
                                    -------------------------------

Atlanta, Georgia
March 23, 1999
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gordon F. Burley, Chief Financial Officer of Merritt Ventures
  Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
  the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
        and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                             



| | By:    | /s/ Gordon F. Burley   
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | GORDON F. BURLEY       
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | September 24, 2004     



This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which
  it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant
  under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether
  made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
  incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002****(18 U.S.C. 1350)**     The undersigned, Michael J. Cunningham, Executive Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer of Aeropostale, Inc. (the“Company”) has executed this certificated inconnection with the filing with the Securities and ExchangeCommission of the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 30,2005 (the “Report”).     The undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge:          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act    of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”); and           2. The information contained the Report fairly presents, in    all material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed thiscertification as of the 1st day of June 2005.     /s/ Michael J. Cunningham           Michael J. Cunningham *Executive Vice President-Chief* *Financial Officer*This certification accompanies the Report pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shallnot, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Exchange Act. A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION
906

OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Form 10-Q of Nextest Systems Corporation for the three month period ended September 23, 2006, we, Robin Adler, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and James P. Moniz, Chief
Financial Officer, respectively, of Nextest Systems Corporation, hereby certify to the best of our knowledge, that:

(1) such Form 10-Q for
the three month period ended September 23, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the three month period ended September 23, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nextest Systems
Corporation.



|                       |  |                                     
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: November 7, 2006 |  | /s/ Robin Adler                     
|                       |  | Robin Adler                         
|                       |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  | (Principal Executive Officer)       
|                       | 
|Date: November 7, 2006 |  | /s/ James P. Moniz                  
|                       |  | James P. Moniz                      
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer             
|                       |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
No. 09-8825.

#### Charles E. Daniels, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1040, 130 S. Ct. 2068,

176 L. Ed. 2d 420,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2832.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 345 Fed. Appx. 527.
No. 09-8514.

#### John Wesley Lee, Jr., Petitioner v. Douglas F. Gansler, Attorney General of Maryland, et al.

559 U.S. 982, 130 S. Ct. 1712,

176 L. Ed. 2d 197,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2025.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

*198Same case below, 328 Fed. Appx. 849.