alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.CERTIFICATIONIn connection with the annual report of Novellus Systems, Inc. (the “Company) on Form 10-K for theperiod ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report),I, Richard S. Hill, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 ofthe United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periodsindicated.This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.          Date: February 27, 2008 By:  /s/ Richard S. Hill    Richard S. Hill    Chairman of the Board of Directors andChief Executive Officer
Order entered October 13, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 17 - 00539 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF A .R.M., A CHILD On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dal las County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 13 - 09646



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s October 11, 2017 unopposed fifth motion to extend time for filing brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than October 16, 2017.

/s/ CRAI G STODDART JUSTICE
No. 09-7801.

#### Chris Rattis, Petitioner v. Herb Jackson, Superintendent, Brown Creek Correctional Institution.

559 U.S. 943, 130 S. Ct. 1509,

176 L. Ed. 2d 120,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1151.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 332 Fed. Appx. 872.
H. R. 4786

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and six 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 535 Wood 

Street in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘H. Gordon Payrow Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

535 Wood Street in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, shall be known and 

designated as the ‘‘H. Gordon Payrow Post Office Building’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘H. Gordon 

Payrow Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1080

NATHAN J. POWER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee, and UNC-LEAR SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-98-2752-18-2) Submitted: July 14, 2000 Decided: July 27, 2000 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.A. Christopher Potts, HITCHCOCK & POTTS, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Jonathan S. Harbuck, THE KULLMAN FIRM, Birmingham, Alabama; H. Brewton Hagood, ROSEN, GOODSTEIN & HAGOOD, P.A., Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Nathan J. Power appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to his former employer in this wrongful termination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orderand find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Power v. Lear Siegler Servs. Inc. , No. CA-98-2752-18-2 (D.S.C. Dec. 14, 1999). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NO. 07-11-0129-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

MAY 15, 2012

HIPOLITO ALVAREZ, 

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_____________________________

FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 58,169-B; HONORABLE RICHARD DAMBOLD, PRESIDING

Memorandum Opinion

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Appellant, Hipolito Alvarez, appeals his conviction for sexually abusing a child. 

His sole issue involves the trial court‟s decision to allow the child victim to testify via 

closed-circuit television. This allegedly was error because the Texas statute allowing 

that violates the Confrontation Clause appearing in the Sixth Amendment to the United 

States Constitution, as those requirements were purportedly interpreted in Craig v. 

Maryland, 497 U.S. 836, 110 S.Ct. 3157, 111 L.Ed.2d 666 (1990) and its progeny. That 

is, it is not enough to merely satisfy the dictate of art. 38.071, §1 of the Texas Code of 
2

Criminal Procedure, i.e. that the child be “unavailable to testify in the presence of the 

defendant.” TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 38.071, §1 (West Supp. 2011). Rather, 

the evidence must show that the child is unable to communicate or reasonably unable 

to testify in court while in the presence of the defendant.1 We overrule the issue and 

affirm the judgment.

Appellant‟s attack upon art. 38.071 et seq. on the basis of its purported failure to 

comport with the Confrontation Clause was not raised below. Nor did he contend that 

the evidence had to allow the trial court to conclude that the child was “unable to 

communicate” or “reasonably unable to testify” in the presence of the defendant, as 

opposed to merely being “unavailable” to testify, i.e. any distress or trauma would be 

more than de minimus or that significant emotional harm would result. Thus, the 

arguments were not preserved for review. See Karenev v. State, 281 S.W.3d 428, 434 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (stating that facial challenges to the constitutionality of a statute 

may be waived); see also Wilson v. State, 71 S.W.3d 346, 349 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002)

(holding that the grounds urged on appeal must comport with those mentioned at trial, 

otherwise they are waived).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. 

Brian Quinn 

Chief Justice

Do not publish.

 

1

Appellant expressed in his brief that he did not dispute nor concede that “any distress or trauma 

here was more than de minimus . . . or that „significant emotional harm‟ would result, if this complainant 

were made to testify . . . before this appellant.” And, those were the two findings entered by the trial court 

upon receiving evidence on the matter.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, April 21, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, April 21, 2009, at 10 a.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Audrey Y. Jenkins. For more information please contact Ms. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: February 26, 2009.

Shawn F. Collins,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

 [FR Doc. E9-4684 Filed 3-4-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Order entered March 7, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01127-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.M., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 417th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 417-02593-2018

ORDER

We GRANT appellee Texas Department of Family and Protective Services’ March 4, 

2019 motion for extension of time to file its brief, and extend the time for filing the brief to April 

3, 2019.

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4689 Introduced in House (IH)]
```
19 February 2010 ***************************

NSN: 8915 01 583 3201 (WPFA) * MONOGRAPH NO: FS4-01

 ***************************

Item: Applesauce, Carbohydrate Enhanced, Sweetened, Regular Style, Cinnamon (Type IX)

Document: PCR-F-002 Fruits, Wet Pack, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 130 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Medium brown color with ground cinnamon throughout. No undissolved complex 

carbohydrate, no excess weeping.

Odor: Cinnamon.

Flavor: Sweetened applesauce with cinnamon.

Texture: Smooth fine pulp with no undissolved particles.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Extreme darkening. More than slight weeping to extreme runniness or syneresis.

Odor: Fermented, sour, apple cider, musty.

Flavor: Musty, old, overly tart or sour, bitter, caramelized, fermented, apple cider.

Texture: Moderate to extreme weeping of fluids from pulp (See Unique Examination 

Procedures).

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

To examine for excessive weeping, pour product onto a flat unrestricted surface (e.g., bottom of paper 

plate or cookie sheet) and observe for approximately one minute before making your determination.

: 

Special Notes

Product is normally produced from canned applesauce by heating and filling at pasteurization 

temperatures. This alters the overall quality of the product compared to applesauce that has only been 

canned one time. The variety of apples used will also noticeably affect quality factors such as color, 

: 
19 February 2010 ***************************

NSN: 8915 01 583 3201 (WPFA) * MONOGRAPH NO: FS4-01

 ***************************

odor, taste and texture. Serviceability judgments must be made with these factors in mind. Applesauce 

color is expected to darken only slightly to a moderately medium brown color with ground cinnamon 

throughout within a few months after DoP. This color change is unavoidable. Once the product color 

has changed as described, it is not expected to worsen appreciably unless storage conditions are

unfavorable. Color should not be the deciding factor unless it is so aesthetically objectionable that the 

product is unlikely to be consumed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Richard Kehmeier, President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer of American Goldfields Inc. (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended April 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results  of operations of the Company.








Date: June 14, 2011





/s/ Richard Kehmeier

Richard Kehmeier

President, Chief Executive Officer,

Secretary, and Treasurer

(Principal Executive Officer,

Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer)








This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2017232EN.01000102.xml

| 18.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8532 — Blackstone Group/Sponda)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 232/02)

On 10 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8532. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8532. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cirracor, Inc. a Nevada corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Reed Fisher, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Cirracor, Inc., and will be retained by Cirracor, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Reed Fisher
--------------------------
Reed Fisher
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
May 19, 2005
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), I, Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of Denali TherapeuticsInc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that: 

 
1.The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “PeriodicReport”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and 
 
2.The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
Date: March 19, 2018 

 
 
By:
 /s/ Ryan J. Watts 
Name:
 
Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D.
 
Title:
 
President and Chief Executive Officer
**
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of IPC Acquisition Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Lance Boxer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. By:
    
    /s/ Lance BoxerLance BoxerChief Executive OfficerFebruary 11, 2005
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to IPC
Acquisition Corp. and will be retained by IPC Acquisition Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.1

 

	
 
    	
W.   R. Grace & Co.
    	
T   410.531.4574
    
	
 
    	
7500   Grace Drive
    	
F   410.531.4414
    
	
 
    	
Columbia,   MD 21044
    	
Fred.Festa@grace.com
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
www.grace.com
    


 



 

Fred Festa

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Personal and Confidential

 

Congratulations!  The Grace Board of Directors has approved the Annual Incentive Compensation Program (AICP) for the 20[    ] calendar year, and you will be eligible to participate at a target of       % of your annual base salary.

 

We have aligned the AICP performance metrics with our Annual Operating Plan (AOP) targets for Adjusted EBIT and Adjusted Operating Cash Flow. This means that the overall AICP incentive pool will be derived from our achievement regarding these targets: 50% of the AICP incentive pool will be established based on our performance with respect to our Adjusted EBIT target and 50% with respect to our Adjusted Operating Cash Flow target.  The table below describes the funding levels of the AICP incentive pool based on the achievement of those targets.

 

	
Actual Grace
   Performance as a
   Percentage of Relevant
   Target
   (%)
    	
 
    	
Percentage of 50% of
   Aggregate Target
   Award Amounts
   Funded in Partial
   Pool*
   (%)
    
	
less   than 80
    	
 
    	
-0-
    
	
80
    	
 
    	
25
    
	
100
    	
 
    	
100
    
	
135   or above
    	
 
    	
200
    


 




*  Actual amounts funded to the AICP incentive pool will be separately prorated on a straight line basis regarding performance between 80% and 100%, and between 100% and 135%, of the Relevant Target.

 

In addition to our performance in respect of the AOP targets described above, your individual payout will also be based on your individual performance and your operating segment’s  performance.  After considering these factors, your actual payout could range from 0 - 2 times your target.

 

Also note that the Compensation Committee of the Grace Board has the discretion to adjust the performance objectives or establish or increase the size of the AICP incentive pool even if performance objectives are not achieved.  Grace reserves the right to change, modify, or terminate this, and its other, compensation (and benefits) programs at any time.  In addition, you should remember that, in order to receive any AICP payment, you must be actively employed by Grace at the time that these amounts are actually paid.  Finally, please keep this matter confidential.

 

Your contribution, hard work and leadership in living the GRACE Vision and Values are vital to the overall success of the company.

 

Thank you for continuing to help build a better and safer Grace.

 

 

	

    	
 
    
	
Alfred   E. Festa
    	
 
    
	
Chairman,   President and CEO
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-55179 of Koger Equity, Inc. on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-54617
of Koger Equity, Inc. on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-20975 of Koger
Equity, Inc. on Form S-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-23429 of Koger
Equity, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated February 23, 1998, appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Koger Equity, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1997.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Jacksonville, Florida
March 18, 1998
No. 09-8912.

#### John Tibbs, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 997, 130 S. Ct. 1752,

176 L. Ed. 2d 222,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2223.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.