alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9327-9328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4345]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment on Surplus Property 
Release at Gulfport Biloxi International Airport, Gulfport, MS

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent to rule on land release request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. 47153(c), notice is 
being given that the FAA is considering a request from the Gulfport 
Biloxi Regional Airport Authority (GBRAA) to waive the requirement that 
a 0.84-acre parcel of surplus property, located at the Gulfport Biloxi 
International Airport, be used for aeronautical purposes.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 2, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this notice may be mailed or delivered in 
triplicate to the FAA at the following address: Jackson Airports 
District Office, 100 West Cross Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208-
2307.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to Mr. Bruce

[[Page 9328]]

Frallic, Airport Executive Director at the following address: Gulfport-
Biloxi Regional Airport Authority, 14035-L Airport Road, Gulfport, MS 
39503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Schuller, Program Manager, 
Jackson Airports District Office, 100 West Cross Street, Suite B, 
Jackson, MS 39208-2307, (601) 664-9883. The land release request may be 
reviewed in person at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA is reviewing a request by the 
Gulfport Biloxi Regional Airport Authority to release 0.84 acres of 
surplus property at the Gulfport-Biloxi International Airport. The 
property will be purchased by the City of Gulfport, which is a 
municipality. The property fronts Airport Boulevard and will be used 
for widening an intersection on Airport Boulevard. The net proceeds 
from the sale of this property will be used for airport purposes.
    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office 
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. In addition, any 
person may, upon request, inspect the request, notice and other 
documents germane to the request in person at the office of the 
Gulfport-Biloxi Regional Airport Authority.

    Issued in Jackson, Mississippi, on February 23, 2009.
Rans D. Black,
Manager, Jackson Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. E9-4345 Filed 3-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6652

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BRADLEY DEAN BIDGOOD, a/k/a Brad, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-32-5-02-BR) Submitted: September 25, 2001 Decided: October 23, 2001 Before WILKINS and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph H. Craven, James B. Craven, III, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant. John Stuart Bruce, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Bradley Dean Bidgood seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying the government’s motion to reduce his sentence under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b). We dismiss the appeal from the denial of the Rule 35(b) motion because the order is not reviewable. See United States v. Pridgen , 64 F.3d 147, 149-50 (4th Cir. 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 43 (Friday, March 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4727]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Ravalli County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Ravalli County Resource Advisory Committee will be having 
the routine monthly meeting with project presentations and hold a short 
public forum (question and answer session). The meeting is being held 
pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. 
L. 110-343) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-
Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 110-343). The meeting is open to the 
public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on March 24, 2009, 6:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Bitterroot National Forest 
Supervisor Office, 1801 N. First, Hamilton, Montana. Send written 
comments to Daniel Ritter, District Ranger, Stevensville Ranger 
District, 88 Main Street, Stevensville, MT 59870, by facsimile (406) 
777-7423, or electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7612041f0202130436100558101312580305"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a0c4d2c9d4d4c5d2e0c6d38ec6c5c48ed5d3">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Ritter, Stevensville District 
Ranger and Designated Federal Officer, Phone: (406) 777-5461.

    Dated: February 27, 2009.
Julie K. King,
Deputy Forest Supervisor.
 [FR Doc. E9-4727 Filed 3-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 09-9010.

#### Julio C. Valle, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1020, 130 S. Ct. 1917,

176 L. Ed. 2d 388,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2424.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 359 Fed. Appx. 77.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

          REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS, ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

To GaSonics International Corporation:

       We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of GaSonics
International Corporation (a Delaware Corporation) and subsidiaries as of
September 30, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended September 30, 2000. These financial statements and the schedule
referred to below are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

       We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

       In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of GaSonics
International Corporation and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2000 and 1999,
and the results of their operations and cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended September 30, 2000 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States.

       Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial
statements taken as a whole. The schedule listed in the index under item
14(a)(2) is the responsibility of the Company's management and is presented for
purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and is
not part of the basic financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to
the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements
and, in our opinion, fairly states in all material respects the financial data
required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements
taken as a whole.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

San Jose, California
October 30, 2000
No. 09M91.

#### In re Jane Doe, Petitioner.

559 U.S. 1105, 130 S. Ct. 2427,

176 L. Ed. 2d 921,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3704.

May 3, 2010.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus under seal with redacted copies for the public record denied.
## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

MANDATE

TO THE 298TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, on the 30th day of April

, 2015 , the

cause on appeal to revise or reverse the judgment between

CHELSEA DAVIS, Appellant

No. 05

- 14

- 01600

- CV V.

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C., Appellee On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District

Court, Dallas County, Texas.

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 13

- 14215

- M.

Opinion delivered by Justice Evans.

Justices Fillmore and Myers, participating.

was determined; and this Court made its order in these words:

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

It is ORDERED that appellee MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. recover its costs of this appeal

from appellant CHELSEA DAVIS.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of the Court of Appeals

for the Fifth District of Texas, in this behalf, and have it duly obeyed and executed.

WITNESS the HON. CAROLYN WRIGHT, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, with

the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Dallas, this 10th day of July, 2015.

LISA MATZ, Clerk
---

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Hamish Malkin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of
Argentex Mining Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and
I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change
in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and
I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the
company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
company's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 8, 2008

|/s/
      Hamish Malkin          | 
|-------------------------------- | 
|Hamish Malkin                    | 
|Chief Financial Officer          | 
|(Principal Financial Officer and | 
|Principal Accounting Officer)    | 

---
No. 09-8145.

#### Kenneth B. Malpass, Petitioner v. Judith C. Powelson.

559 U.S. 976, 130 S. Ct. 1693,

176 L. Ed. 2d 188,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2145.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lorrie Ann Archibald, Chief Executive Officer of Merritt
Ventures Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                             

| | By:    | /s/
      Lorrie Ann Archibald
| | ------ | ------------------------------
| |        |                               
| | Name:  | LORRIE ANN ARCHIBALD          
| |        |                               
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer       
| |        |                               
| | Date:  | October 18, 2005              

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
No. 09-9915.

#### Michael Baird Jordan, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1113, 130 S. Ct. 2420,

176 L. Ed. 2d 935,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3871.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Terra Nostra Resources Corp.  (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeff Reynolds, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  November 23, 2005

By: /s/ Jeff Reynolds

Name: Jeff Reynolds

Title:   Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
No. 09-725.

#### Thomas M. Beaver, et al., Petitioners v. Patricia Dannemann.

559 U.S. 1045, 130 S. Ct. 2061,

176 L. Ed. 2d 429,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2769.

March 29, 2010.

Motion of Florida Defense Lawyers Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.

Same case below, 14 So. 3d 246.
First Amendment to Silgan Containers Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan



 Exhibit 10.27 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
 SILGAN CONTAINERS CORPORATION 
 SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made on November 1, 2008, by SILGAN CONTAINERS CORPORATION, a corporation duly organized and
existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “Sponsoring Employer”). 
 W I T N
E S S E T H: 
 WHEREAS, the Sponsoring Employer maintains the Silgan Containers
Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “Plan”), as amended and restated effective January 1, 2007; 
 WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the amended and restated Plan, the Sponsoring Employer adopted the amended and restated Silgan Containers Corporation Pension Plan for Salaried Employees (the
“Salaried Pension Plan”) effective July 1, 2008; 
 WHEREAS, certain definitions in the Plan refer to definitions
in the Salaried Pension Plan; 
 WHEREAS, the Sponsoring Employer desires to amend the Plan to clarify the application of
certain terms in the Salaried Pension Plan to participants in the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, this amendment shall supersede the
provisions of the Plan to the extent those provisions are inconsistent with the provisions of this amendment. 
 NOW, THEREFORE,
the Sponsoring Employer does hereby amend the Plan, effective as of July 1, 2008, as follows: 
 1. By deleting the
existing Section 1.18 and substituting therefor the following: 
 “1.18 ‘Normal Retirement
Age’ means the earlier of: 
 (a) the attainment of at least age sixty (60) with the completion of
ten (10) or more years of Vesting Service; or 
 (b) the attainment of at least age sixty-five
(65) with the completion of five (5) or more years of Vesting Service.” 
 2. By deleting the existing
Section 1.21 and substituting therefor the following: 
 “1.21 ‘Period of Service’
means ‘Period of Service’ as defined in the Pension Plan prior to July 1, 2008.” 
 3. By adding the
following new Section 1.34: 
 “1.34 ‘Vesting Service’ means ‘Vesting
Service’ as defined in the Pension Plan. 







 4. By deleting the existing Section 6.6 and substituting therefor the following:

 “6.6 Vesting. A Participant shall always be fully vested in contributions made to his Deferral
Contribution Account. Contributions made to a Participant’s Matching Account, DISP Make-up Account, and Supplemental Pension Account shall vest according to the following schedule: 

 

					
	 Full Years of Vesting Service
	  	Vested Percentage	 
	 Less than 5
	  	 	0	% 
	 5 or more
	  	 	100	%” 

 Except as
specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as prior to this First Amendment. 
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the Sponsoring Employer has caused this First Amendment to be executed as of the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	SILGAN CONTAINERS CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ Anthony E. Cost
	Title:	 	Vice-President – Human Resources



  
 2
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

APRIL 14, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-10331

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 07-80084-CR-DTKH

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus

CRISTOBAL GONZALES, 

a.k.a. Carlos Puga, 

a.k.a. Cristobal Gonzales-Martinez, 

a.k.a. Christopher C. Gonzalez, 

a.k.a. Christopher C. Gonzales, 

a.k.a. Carlos Christibol Puga, 

a.k.a. Christopher Carolos Gonzalez, 

a.k.a. Cristobal Gonzalez, 

a.k.a. Cristobal Gonzalz, 

a.k.a. Cristoba Gonzalez, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________
(April 14, 2009)

Before BLACK, BARKETT and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Valentin Rodriguez, appointed counsel for Cristobal Gonzales in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a

brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18

L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms that

there are no issues of arguable merit on appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to

withdraw is GRANTED, and Gonzales’s convictions and sentences are

AFFIRMED.

2