alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017286EN.01000101.xml

| 30.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/1

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.8084 — Bayer/Monsanto)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 286/01)

On 22 August 2017, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the abovementioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

1

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8084 — Bayer/Monsanto, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
No. 09-9769.

#### ShanelAnn Stasz, Petitioner v. Michael Eisenberg, Trustee and Executor for the Trust and Estate of Hugo Quackenbush, Deceased.

560 U.S. 912, 130 S. Ct. 3293,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1197,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3895.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6095

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES ALLAN ABSTON, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 99-6420

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES ALLAN ABSTON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-97-339-A) Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: May 28, 19992 Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. No. 99-6095 dismissed and No. 99-6420 affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Allan Abston, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s orders are marked as “filed” on December 10, 1998, and December 29, 1998, the district court’s records show that they were entered on the docket sheet on January 27, 1999, and December 31, 1998, respectively. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the judgment or order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 3 PER CURIAM: James Allan Abston seeks to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to file an untimely 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) motion challenging his 1997 convictions on drug and firearms charges. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, in No. 99-6095, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Abston , No. CR-97-339-A (E.D. Va. Dec. 31, 1998 & Jan. 27, 1999). * In No. 99-6420, Abston appeals the district court’s denial of a motion to reconsider an order denying his motion for preparation of transcripts. As Abston did not make a satisfactory showing of particularized need for the transcripts, 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (1994),we affirm the district court’s ruling. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and oral argument would not aid the decisional process. No. 99-6095 - DISMISSED No. 99-6420 - AFFIRMED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,

 Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 

 

March 28, 2018 

a0321 

Order 

 

Clerk 

March 28, 2018 

156343 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 156343 

 COA: 336592 

Montcalm CC: 2016-021154-AR 

CHRISTOPHER LEE LANGE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 27, 2017 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>

                                   Exhibit 99



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  Peter  Schulhof,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  on  Form  10-QSB  of Delbrook Corporation for the quarterly period ended
October  31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Delbrook  Corporation.


                               By:    /s/ Peter Schulhof
                                     ---------------------------
                               Name:  Peter Schulhof

                               Title: Chief  Executive  Officer
                                      and  Chief  Financial  Officer

                               Date:  December  13,  2002
No. 09-872.

#### Michael Casey, et al., Petitioners v. North American Savings, F.S.B., et al.

559 U.S. 1037, 130 S. Ct. 2062,

176 L. Ed. 2d 414,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2858.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 583 F.3d 586.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of AFV Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Suzanne Herring,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Date:
      May 20, 2008





/s/ Suzanne HerringSuzanne HerringChief Financial
              Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# AGENCY:

Consumer Product Safety Commission. 

# ACTION:

Notice; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Consumer Product Safety Commission published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of February 23, 2009, concerning a request for comments on a Notice of Availability of Draft Guidance Regarding Which Children's Products are Subject to the Requirements of CPSIA Section 108. The document omitted a Web site link.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Todd Stevenson, 301-504-6836. 

## Correction 

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of February 23, 2009, in FR Doc. E9-3808, on page 8060, in the third column, at the end of the sentence at paragraph O., correct the Web site link to read: Web site (                        *http://www.cpsc.gov/​about/​cpsia/​phthalatesop.pdf*)                     

Dated: March 3, 2009. 

Todd Stevenson,

Director, Office of the Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9-4947 Filed 3-6-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Jeffrey Finkelstein, of Argentex Mining
Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Argentex Mining
Corporation for the interim period ended April 30, 2011 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Argentex Mining Corporation.

Dated: June 10, 2011



/s/ Jeffrey
FinkelsteinJeffrey
Finkelstein Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer
andPrincipal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Argentex Mining
Corporation and will be retained by Argentex Mining Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit
13.1








Certification by CEO and CFO


pursuant
to Section 1350, as adapted pursuant to


Section 906 of the
Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002





The
certification set forth below is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission, in connection with Central Puerto
S.A.’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2017 (the “Annual Report”) solely for the purpose
of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code as adapted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002.





Jorge
Rauber, the Chief Executive Officer and Fernando Roberto Bonnet,
the Chief Financial Officer of Central Puerto S.A. each certifies
that, to the best of their knowledge:





1.
 the Annual Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
 the information
contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Central Puerto S.A.








By:
/s/
Jorge RauberName:
Jorge
RauberTitle:
Chief
Executive Officer








By:
/s/
Fernando Roberto
BonnetName:
Fernando
Roberto BonnetTitle:
Chief
Financial Officer





Date:
April 27, 2018.
Exhibit 31.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Robert J. Wilkins, Chief Financial Officer of Joning Corp. certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Joning Corp.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report
(the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

     6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


October 21, 2004


/s/  Robert J. Wilkins
-----------------------------
     Robert J. Wilkins
     Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-8942.

#### Anthony Pompey, Petitioner v. New York.

559 U.S. 1051, 130 S. Ct. 2347,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3060.

176 L. Ed. 2d 566,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, denied.

*567Same case below, 63 App. Div. 3d 612, 882 N.Y.S.2d 66.
**
**Exhibit 31**

**Certifications**

I,Richard Simpson, certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Kand all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2017-B1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2.    Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of thedistribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of RegulationAB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and 

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above,I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; LNR Partners, LLC; Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC; Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas; CoreLogic CommercialReal Estate Services, Inc.; National Tax Search, LLC; AEGON USA Realty Advisors, LLC; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; and KeyBank National Association. 

Date:    March 29, 2019 

 

 

/s/ Richard Simpson

Richard Simpson

President, CitigroupCommercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

 

 
CGCMT 2017-B1Certifications (2018) 

**
No. 09-9093.

#### Gregory Lawrence Moore, Petitioner v. Rissie L. Owens, et al.

559 U.S. 1064, 130 S. Ct. 2107,

176 L. Ed. 2d 718,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3249.

April 19, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, *719and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

Same case below, 361 Fed. Appx. 587.
* The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-1190

___________ Rayon Burns Simmons, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: May 5, 2005 Filed: May 9, 2005

___________ Before SMITH, FAGG, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Rayon Burns Simmons appeals the district court’s * denial of Simmons's motion to expunge his criminal record. Simmons has provided no basis for the relief he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
From: Jordan, Ronald

To: YOUNAN, JEAN-CLAUDE

Cc: Thomas Finseth; Hall, Jessica; teffinger@scana.com; Flanders, Phillip

Subject: FW: Data request for Wateree Station

Date: Thursday, November 20, 2014 9:01:28 AM

Attachments: image003.png

Data request_SCANA_Oct 30 2014.pdf

SE05158A1_Analytical Data Table.xlsx

SE005158A2_Supplemental Data_SCANA_10082014.xlsx

Good morning Jean-Claude,

I am following up on our conversations from yesterday. Based on those discussions, EPA is revising

the deadline for submitting the information specified in the attached letter dated October 30, 2014.

The revised deadline for submitting data requested in Item 10 of the letter, in MS Excel format, is

December 1, 2014. The revised deadline for submitting all other information requested by the

letter is December 12, 2014. I understand information for certain technologies may be available in

advance of that date and, if so, we would appreciate receiving it sooner than December 12.

Thank you for your efforts in this matter.

Regards,

Ron

------------------------------------

Ron Jordan

USEPA Office of Water

Engineering & Analysis Division (4303T)

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW

Washington DC 20460

(202) 566-1003

From: Flanders, Phillip 

Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 11:24 AM

To: teffinger@scana.com

Cc: YOUNAN, JEAN-CLAUDE; Jordan, Ronald; Thomas Finseth

Subject: Data request for Wateree Station

Dear Mr. Effinger,

I am sending a letter requesting information about pilot testing at Wateree Station. The letter also

asks SCANA to identify pilot testing at other plants. Please be sure to let me know if you have any

questions about the information EPA is requesting. We can also send a hard copy of the letter to

you.
Thank you,

Phillip Flanders, Ph.D.

Environmental Engineer

Engineering and Analysis Division

Office of Science and Technology

Office of Water

Mail Code 4303T

(202) 566-8323
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

WILLIAM V. SCOTT, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3295

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed March 23, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pasco County; Mary M. Handsel, 

Judge. 

William V. Scott, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
No. 09-9109.

#### Benny Lee Hodge, Petitioner v. Philip Parker, Warden.

559 U.S. 1075, 130 S. Ct. 2107,

176 L. Ed. 2d 736,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3435,

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 579 F.3d 627.
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

HANDDOWN LIST OF JUNE 7, 2016

WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

------------------------------------------------------------------

WD78305 Robert E. Smith vs. State of Missouri

WD79086 Brenda King, et al vs. automobile Club Inter-Ins. Exchange

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

------------------------------------------------------------------

None