alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IB 

Union Calendar No. 360 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 479 

[Report No. 109–620] 

To replace a Coastal Barrier Resources System map relating to Coastal 

Barrier Resources System Grayton Beach Unit FL–95P in Walton County, Florida. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2005 

Mr. MILLER of Florida (for himself and Mr. BOYD) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2006 

Additional sponsor: Mr. CRENSHAW

SEPTEMBER 6, 2006 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on February 1, 2005] 

A BILL 

To replace a Coastal Barrier Resources System map relating 

to Coastal Barrier Resources System Grayton Beach 

Unit FL–95P in Walton County, Florida. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 479 RH

1 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF COASTAL BARRIER RE2 SOURCES SYSTEM MAP RELATING TO 

3 GRAYTON BEACH UNIT FL–95P IN WALTON 

4 COUNTY, FLORIDA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The map described in subsection 

6 (b) relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System unit 

7 Grayton Beach Unit FL–95P, located in Walton County, 

8 Florida, as included in the set of maps entitled ‘‘Coastal 

9 Barrier Resources System’’ referred to in section 4(a) of the 

10 Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)), is here11 by replaced by another map relating to that unit entitled 

12 ‘‘Grayton Beach Unit FL–95P and Draper Lake Unit FL– 

13 96’’ and dated ‘‘July 24, 2006’’. 

14 (b) REPLACED MAP DESCRIBED.—The map replaced 

15 under subsection (a) is subtitled ‘‘COASTAL BARRIER 

16 RESOURCES SYSTEM GRAYTON BEACH UNIT FL– 

17 95P DRAPER LAKE UNIT FL–96’’ and dated October 24, 

18 1990. 

19 (c) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall 

20 keep the maps referred to in subsections (a) on file and 

21 available for inspection in accordance with the provisions 

22 of section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 

23 U.S.C. 3503(b)). 


pwalker on PROD1PC65 with BILLS

pwalker on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 360 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 479 

[Report No. 109

–620] 

A BILL 

To replace a Coastal Barrier Resources System 

County, Florida. tem Grayton Beach Unit FL–95P in Walton map relating to Coastal Barrier Resources SysSEPTEMBER 6, 2006 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


pwalker on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                   EXHIBIT 21

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF LINDSAY MANUFACTURING CO.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Ownership
                                                                Percentage
                                                                ----------
<S>                                                             <C>
Lindsay International Sales Corporation - Delaware (Inactive)      100%

Lindsay Transportation, Inc. - Nebraska                            100%

Lindsay - Irrigation Pty., Ltd. - Australia (Inactive)             100%

Lindsay Europe SAS - France                                        100%

Irrigation Specialists, Inc. - Delaware                            100%

Lindsay America do Sul Ltda. - Brazil                              100%

Lindsay Manufacturing Africa (PTY) Ltd - South Africa              100%

LMC Professional Supply, Inc. - Delaware (Inactive)                100%
</TABLE>


                                       59
-1- 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

COURT OF APPEALS 

JAMES DECKER and KAY DECKER, 

 Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

FOR PUBLICATION 

October 28, 2014 

v No. 316479 

Oakland Circuit Court 

TRUX R US, INC., LC No. 2007-086261-NI 

 Defendant, 

and 

AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, 

 Garnishee Defendant-Appellee. 

Before: RIORDAN, P.J., and CAVANAGH and TALBOT, JJ. 

CAVANAGH, J. (dissenting). 

 I respectfully dissent. 

 The issue in this case is whether MCR 3.101(L)(1) or MCR 3.101(M)(2) prohibit a 

plaintiff from conducting discovery if not initiated within 14 days after service of the garnishee 

disclosure although MCR 3.101(T) allows for motions to extend the time for conducting 

discovery. 

 Here, the trial court denied plaintiffs’ motion to extend the time in which to submit 

written interrogatories to Auto Owners, noting that subrule (M)(2) mandates that the facts stated 

in the disclosure be accepted as true unless discovery was served “within the time allowed by 

subrule (L)(1),” i.e., within 14 days after service of the disclosure. However, subrule (T) grants 

the trial court discretion to extend the time for conducting discovery in garnishment actions, as in 

other civil actions. See MCR 3.101(T)(2) and (T)(3). But neither subrule (L)(1) nor (M)(2) 

reference or incorporate the circumstances that result by operation of subrule (T). 

 The trial court’s interpretation of subrules (L)(1) and (M)(2), affirmed by the majority, 

impermissibly renders nugatory subrule (T). See Wickens v Oakwood Healthcare Sys, 465 Mich 

53, 60; 631 NW2d 686 (2001). According to this interpretation, even if a motion to extend time 

to conduct discovery was granted under subrule (T), the information obtained would not become 

part of the garnishee disclosure and could not be used by plaintiff to contest the facts stated in the 
-2- 

disclosure. That is, the discovery requests would always be served after the time allowed by 

subrule (L)(1), in violation of MCR 3.101(M)(2), when a motion under subrule (T) is granted. 

 Accordingly, I would hold that the trial court’s denial of plaintiff’s motion to extend the 

time in which to conduct discovery was premised on an erroneous interpretation of law and, thus, 

constituted an abuse of discretion. See Kidder v Ptacin, 284 Mich App 166, 170; 771 NW2d 806 

(2009) (citation omitted). Further, I would reverse the trial court’s order granting Auto Owners’ 

motion for summary disposition that was based on the erroneous ruling, and I would remand for 

further proceedings, including plaintiff’s service of written interrogatories to Auto Owners. 

/s/ Mark J. Cavanagh
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Darol Lindloff, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A to the quarterly report on Form10-Q of Panda Ethanol, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.         November 2, 2007 /s/ Darol Lindloff   Darol Lindloff   Chief Executive Officer and President
EXHIBIT
      32.1





Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report of West Bancorporation, Inc. on Form 10-Q
      for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas E. Stanberry, Chairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of West Bancorporation, Inc., certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) The report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of West
      Bancorporation, Inc.





July
      31,
      2008


/s/
                  Thomas E. Stanberry


Thomas
      E.
      Stanberry


Chairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer




30
No. 11-7369.

#### Javier Sanchez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1129, 132 S. Ct. 1044,

181 L. Ed. 2d 767,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 168.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4805 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4805

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 105 North Quincy Street in Clinton, Illinois, as the ``Gene Vance Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 105 
North Quincy Street in Clinton, Illinois, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Gene Vance Post Office Building''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Gene Vance Post Office 
Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
# C_2016453EN.01001201.xml

| 3.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 453/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 453/12

---

Communication from the Minister for Economic Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

(2016/C 453/13)

The Minister for Economic Affairs hereby gives notice that an application has been received for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block P1 as indicated on the map appended as Annex 3 to the Mining Regulation (Mijnbouwregeling) (Government Gazette (Staatscourant) 2002, No 245).

Mijnbouwregeling

Government Gazette

Staatscourant

With reference to the Directive referred to in the introduction and Article 15 of the Mining Act (Mijnbouwwet) (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees (Staatsblad) 2002, No 542), the Minister for Economic Affairs hereby invites interested parties to submit a competing application for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block P1 of the Dutch continental shelf.

Mijnbouwwet

Bulletin of Acts and Decrees

Staatsblad

The Minister for Economic Affairs is the competent authority for the granting of authorisations. The criteria, conditions and requirements referred to in Articles 5(1), 5(2) and 6(2) of the abovementioned Directive are set out in the Mining Act (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees 2002, No 542).

Bulletin of Acts and Decrees

Applications may be submitted during the 13 weeks following the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union and should be sent to:

Official Journal of the European Union

| The Minister for Economic Affairs |
| --- |
| For the attention of Mr D. W. H. Joanknecht, Energy and Environment Directorate |
| Bezuidenhoutseweg 73 |
| Postbus 20401 |
| 2500 EK Den Haag |
| NEDERLAND |

The Minister for Economic Affairs

For the attention of Mr D. W. H. Joanknecht, Energy and Environment Directorate

Bezuidenhoutseweg 73

Postbus 20401

2500 EK Den Haag

NEDERLAND

Applications received after the expiry of this period will not be considered.

A decision on the applications will be taken not later than 12 months after this period has expired.

Further information can be obtained by calling Mr E. J. Hoppel on the following telephone number: +31 703797762.

---
Summary: emission testing results for Windhager BioWIN, BioWIN-XL and FireWIN
Boiler Size Boiler Size Efficiency Based PM 2.5 CO at 7% O2 Model BTU/hr kW on HHV (%) lb/MMBtu ppm 

### Link to company website >85 <0.08 <270
BioWIN 100 34,000 9.9 87 0.014 65 http://www.windhager.com/int_en/products/pellets/biowin-3/ BioWIN 150 51,000 15 87 0.014 15 http://www.windhager.com/int_en/products/pellets/biowin-3/ BioWIN210 71,650 21 >85 <0.08 <270 http://www.windhager.com/int_en/products/pellets/biowin-3/ BioWIN260 88,500 25.9 87 0.01 69 http://www.windhager.com/int_en/products/pellets/biowin-3/ BioWINXL350 119,400 35 86 0.019 44 http://www.windhager.com/int_en/products/pellets/biowin-xl-4/ BioWINXL450 153,000 45 >85 <0.08 <270 http://www.windhager.com/int_en/products/pellets/biowin-xl-4/ BioWINXL600 205,000 60 85 0.019 48 http://www.windhager.com/int_en/products/pellets/biowin-xl-4/ FireWIN90 30,700 9 88 0.023 90 http://www.windhager.com/int_en/products/pellets/firewin-1/ FireWIN120 41,000 12 88 0.03 94 http://www.windhager.com/int_en/products/pellets/firewin-1/
**Exhibit 31.2**

**OFFICERCERTIFICATION**

I, Edward O. Irion, certifythat:

1.   I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.   The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and have:

a)   Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)  Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c)   Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a)   All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)  Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 14, 2007
|        | /s/ Edward O. Irion      |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Edward O. Irion          |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

1

----
Wendell M. TURNER v. DELMONTE FOOD CO., INC.

No. 93P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Wendell Matthew Turner, for Turner, Wendell M.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 22nd of March 2019 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Forsyth County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 2nd of April 2019 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Forsyth County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

*718The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd of April 2019 by Plaintiff to Amend Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     The undersigned, Michael J. Cunningham, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Aeropostale, Inc. (the "Company") has executed this
certificated in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended May 1, 2004 (the "Report").

     The undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge:

          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
     Act"); and

          2. The information contained the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of
the 9th day of June, 2004.

                                               /s/ MICHAEL J. CUNNINGHAM
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                  Michael J. Cunningham
                                            Executive Vice President and Chief
                                                    Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.