alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w2w88







Exhibit 10.2.88




MIRANT SERVICES

SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT (SAVINGS) PLAN




(As Amended Effective December 31, 2010)



Termination Amendment




     Mirant Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), having established the Mirant
Services Supplemental Benefit (Savings) Plan, as amended and restated effective as of January 1,
2009 (the “Plan”) and having reserved the right under Section 6.2 thereof to amend and terminate
the Plan, does hereby terminate the Plan, effective as of December 31, 2010 (the “Termination
Date”), by adding the following new Article VII to the Plan:



ARTICLE VII

TERMINATION




     This Plan is terminated as of December 31, 2010 in accordance with Section 6.2 of the Plan and
the written consent of the Board, dated as of December 2, 2010, which approved and authorized the
termination of the Plan within twelve (12) months after the consummation date of the transaction
contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among RRI Energy, Inc., RRI Energy
Holdings, Inc. and the Company, dated as of April 11, 2010 in accordance with Section
1.409A-3(j)(4)(ix)(V) of the Federal Tax Regulations and each Participant shall be paid, in a lump
sum, an amount in cash equal to the full value of his or her Account as soon as practical following
the termination of the Plan, but in no event later than 12 months following the termination date.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the duly authorized officer of the Company whose name is first set forth
below has executed this Termination Amendment, effective as of the Termination Date.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	MIRANT CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Kevin P. Boudreaux
 	 
	 	 	Kevin P. Boudreaux 	 
	 	 	Vice President, Administration
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CURTIS ANTON FAULK, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D23-1389 

LT Case Nos. 1996-CF-005311-A 

 1996-CF-005310-A 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/

Decision filed June 28, 2023

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Duval County, 

Mark Borello, Judge.

Curtis A. Faulk, Lake Butler, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for 

Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, C.J., WALLIS and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VARDAN FELIKSOVICH GRIGORIAN,

AKA Vardan Grigorian,

Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 10-72757

Agency No. A070-176-182

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 27, 2016** 

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Vardan Feliksovich Grigorian, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions pro

se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his

motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to

FILED

OCT 04 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
reopen, Avagyan v. Holder, 646 F.3d 672, 678 (9th Cir. 2011), and we deny the

petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Grigorian’s motion to

reopen where he filed the motion five years after the BIA issued its final order of

removal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and failed to demonstrate that he exercised

the due diligence required to obtain equitable tolling of the filing deadline, see

Avagyan, 646 F.3d at 679.

We do not consider documentation attached to the opening brief that was not

part of the administrative record below. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(A).

In light of our disposition, we do not address Grigorian’s other contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 10-72757
STATE of North Carolina v. Karlos Antonio HOLMES

No. 28P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Amanda S. Zimmer, Assistant Appellate Defender, For Holmes, Karlos Antonio

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender

Isham F. Hicks, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 18th of January 2019 by Defendant in *416this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Eon Labs,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Bernhard Hampl, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
|              | /s/  Bernhard Hampl, Ph.D. |   |
|-------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|              | Bernhard  Hampl, Ph.D.     |
|              | Chief  Executive Officer   |
|              |                       |
|              |                       |
| November 13, 2003 |                       |

 

----
No. 09-638.

#### Leory Hill, Jr., Petitioner v. Emory University, et al.

559 U.S. 991, 130 S. Ct. 1737,

176 L. Ed. 2d 212,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2324.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 346 Fed. Appx. 390.
Attachment 003 – TS1201UC – Pre - Notice Communication

1 page 

# sanitized
No. 09-8316.

#### Kendrick Stafford, Petitioner v. Florida.

559 U.S. 980, 130 S. Ct. 1706,

176 L. Ed. 2d 195,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2062.

March 1,2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, denied.

Same case below, 13 So. 3d 1067.
No. 09-8464.

#### In re Mitchell Lee Walck, Petitioner.

559 U.S. 1103, 130 S. Ct. 2400,

176 L. Ed. 2d 788,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3626.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 934, 130 S. Ct. 1554, 176 L. Ed. 2d 153, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 1092.
No. 09-9512.

#### Larry Spykes, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1079, 130 S. Ct. 2117,

176 L. Ed. 2d 742,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3410.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 355 Fed. Appx. 864.
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 
 
 **Certification
        of Chief Executive Officer of ULURU Inc.**
 **Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant**
 **to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of ULURU Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
        10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the
        “Report”), the undersigned officer of ULURU Inc. does hereby certify, pursuant
        to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
        (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:
 
 (1.)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2.)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 Date:
                  May 22, 2006
              
              /s/
                  Kerry P. GrayKerry
                  P. GrayPresident
                  and Chief Executive Officer
No. 09-8179.

#### Jasper Harris, Jr., Petitioner v. Virginia Employment Commission.

559 U.S. 977, 130 S. Ct. 1696,

176 L. Ed. 2d 190,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2036.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
No. 09-8697.

#### Elena Chitoiu, Petitioner v. UNUM Provident Corp., et al.

559 U.S. 1031, 130 S. Ct. 1901,

176 L. Ed. 2d 404,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2350.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 345 Fed. Appx. 625.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Companies Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

Date: November 14, 2005                     By:      /s/ Robert M. Carmichael
                                                     ---------------------------
                                            Name:    Robert M. Carmichael
                                            Title:   President and
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to United Companies
Corporation and will be retained by United Companies Corporation and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                 EXHIBIT 32.1-1
No. 09-1112.

#### Betty Madrid, et al., Petitioners v. April Kaiser, et al.

560 U.S. 905, 130 S. Ct. 3287,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1186,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3888.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division Two, denied.
No. 09-10062.

#### J. C. Chatman, Petitioner v. United States.

560 U.S. 915, 130 S. Ct. 3300,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1202,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3884.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 359 Fed. Appx. 62.
**Exhibit
      32**





**Certification
      by the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
      18 U.
      S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





Pursuant
      to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, Barbara Duncan, hereby certify that, to the
      best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DOV
      Pharmaceutical, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in
      the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of DOV Pharmaceutical, Inc.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      DOV and will be retained by DOV and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
      Barbara Duncan




Barbara
      Duncan


Chief
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer


August
      13, 2008





This
      certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
      extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such
      certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
      under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act,
      except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
      reference.
Exhibit 31.2

NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.

CERTIFICATION

I, John D. Hertz, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Novellus Systems, Inc.; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                           
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: March 23, 2012 |  | By: |  | /s/ John D. Hertz                         
|                     |  |     |  | John D. Hertz                             
|                     |  |     |  | Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
No. 11-7189.

#### Edwin Walker, Petitioner v. Jerome W. Walsh, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Dallas, et al.

565 U.S. 1126, 132 S. Ct. 1033,

181 L. Ed. 2d 761,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 352.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00134

- CV
Grupo Mexico S.A.B. de C.V.

v. Mt. McKinley Insurance Company and Everest Reinsurance Company

On a ppeal from the 319th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial C ourt C ause No. 07

- 5899

- G

JUDGMENT
T his Co urt ’ s judgment issued on December 19, 2019, is hereby withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor.
THE THI RTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed

. The Cour t orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant , Grupo Me xi co S.A. B. de C.V. We further order this decision certified below for observance. January 30 , 20 20
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 38268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-15899]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME: Friday, July 6, 2012; 9:30 a.m. EDT.

PLACE: 624 Ninth Street NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

Meeting Agenda

    This meeting is open to the public.
I. Approval of Agenda
II. Program Planning Update and discussion of projects:
     Discussion and Vote on Strategic Plan
     Vote on 2012 Final Statutory Report
     Update on Immigration Briefing
     Scheduling of Future Briefings
III. Management and Operations
     Discussion on Agency Staffing
IV. Adjourn Meeting

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:  Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting 
Chief, Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact Pamela 
Dunston at (202) 376-8105 or at signlanguage@usccr.gov at least seven 
business days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

    Dated: June 25, 2012.
Kimberly Tolhurst,
Senior Attorney-Advisor.
[FR Doc. 2012-15899 Filed 6-25-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
# C_2016127EN.01001201.xml

| 9.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/12

---

Notice concerning a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU

Request made by a Contracting Entity

(2016/C 127/08)

On 2 February 2016 the Commission received a request in accordance with Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement procedures by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (1). The first working day following receipt of the request is 3 February 2016.

1

This request, made by the President of the Office of Electronic Communications on behalf of Poczta Polska S.A. and concerns currier services and other services than postal in Poland. Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU provides that the later Directive is not applicable when the relevant activity is directly exposed to competition in markets to which access is not restricted. These conditions are evaluated solely for the purposes of Directive 2014/25/EU and are without prejudice to the application of competition rules.

Pursuant to letter (a) of first paragraph, of point 1 of Annex IV to Directive 2014/25/EU, the Commission is allowed a period of 105 working days to take a decision on this request, commencing on the working day referred to above. The period therefore expires on 7 July 2016.

---

(1)  OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243.

1

---
No. 09-9368.

#### Anibal Ulloa, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1054, 130 S. Ct. 2357,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3053.

176 L. Ed. 2d 571,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 355 Fed. Appx. 286.
STATE v. Jeffery Daniel WAYCASTER

294A18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 3, 2019

Dylan J.C. Buffum, Attorney at Law, for Waycaster, Jeffery Daniel.

Alexander G. Walton, Assistant Attorney General, Ted Bell, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*431The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 1st of April 2019 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of April 2019."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 7th day of May 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of New England Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, David J.
O'Connor, President, Chief Executive Officer and chief financial officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


                                            /s/ David J. O'Connor
                                            ----------------------------
                                            David J. O'Connor
                                            Chief Executive Officer and Director
                                            November 14, 2005
# C_2017358EN.01000202.xml

| 24.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 358/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 358/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8659 — Equistone Partners Europe SAS/Groupe Bruneau)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 358/04)

On 19 October 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8659. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8659. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
No. 09-9353.

#### Anthony Threatt, Petitioner v. Thomas Birkett, Warden.

559 U.S. 1097, 130 S. Ct. 2382,

176 L. Ed. 2d 776,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3527.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.