alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Draft Proposal CB-45

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC). Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/ commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/



## Snow Melt Provisions (CB-45)

Objective: Ensure that all snow melting systems are covered by the code.

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise Section C403.2.4.5 as follows:

C403.2.4.5 Snow melt system controls. Snow – and ice-melting systems, supplied through energy

service to the building, shall include automatic controls capable of shutting off the system when the

pavement temperature is above 50 0 F and no precipitation is falling a nd an automatic or manual control

that will allow shutoff when the outdoor temperature is above 40 0 F so that the potential for snow or ice

accumulation is negligible

.

Reason: Because the energy for snow and ice

‐ melting systems could come from service other than the

building, the revision is needed to ensure all energy use for snow melting is covered. The language at

the end of the last sentence being removed is not needed; it is not necessary in this case to explain the

intent of the provisions in the code.

Cost Impact: There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change.
No. 09-9413.

#### Maurice Wellons, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1055, 130 S. Ct. 2364,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3038.

176 L. Ed. 2d 573,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 10.2

SCHEDULE OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS PARTY TO THE

2007 CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT

Each of the parties identified below is party to a change in control agreement (2007 CIC Agreement) with Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. substantially in the
form of Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. for the quarter ended June 29, 2007:



|                   |  |                                                         |  |                                                        
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|Name of Executive  |  | Benefit Level Under Section 6 of the 2007 CIC
Agreement |  | Benefit Level Under Section 8 of the 2007 CIC
Agreement
|Angelo Rago        |  | Two Times                                               |  | Two Times                                              
|Michael J. Lambert |  | Two Times                                               |  | Two Times
No. 09-9059.

#### Wendall Keith Robinson, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1021, 130 S. Ct. 1921,

176 L. Ed. 2d 391,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2472.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 612.
Print	

 

 

**National Strategy for Counterterrorism of the United States of America**

 

October 2018

 

Today's terrorist landscape is more fluid and complex than ever. For this reason, counterterrorism remains a top priority for this Administration. Our principal terrorist enemies are radical Islamist terrorist groups that seek to conduct attacks globally, violate our borders, and radicalize and recruit potential extremists within the United States and abroad. We continue to face threats from Iran, the most prominent state sponsor of terrorism, through its global network of operatives and its ongoing support to an array of terrorist groups. Terrorists motivated by other forms of extremism also use violence to threaten the homeland and challenge United States interests. These terrorist threats are different in many ways, but they all seek to use violence to undermine the United States and disrupt the American way of life.

 

Read the National Strategy for Counterterrorism

 

View the National Strategy for Counterterrorism Fact Sheet
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of American Standard Companies Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frederic M. Poses, the Chief Executive Officer of
the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report. /s/ Frederic M. PosesFrederic M. PosesChief Executive OfficerFebruary 24, 2005
No. 09-9206.

#### Troy Atera Brown, Petitioner v. Gene M. Johnson, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

559 U.S. 1095, 130 S. Ct. 2375,

176 L. Ed. 2d 773,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3658.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 363 Fed. Appx. 246.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0328

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DAVID RICHARD SENTI,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 18, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 11 2020

12/11/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0328
No. 09-9299.

#### Nathan Willingham, Petitioner v. District of Columbia Board on Professional Responsibility.

559 U.S. 1097, 130 S. Ct. 2381,

176 L. Ed. 2d 775,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3510.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
RUST 

Table IV, Defect No. 109, Major defect. Pitted rust developed in 

retort basket.
No. 09-7282.

#### Delores Karnofel, Petitioner v. Marshall D. Beck, et al.

559 U.S. 1003, 130 S. Ct. 1935,

176 L. Ed. 2d 360,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2567.

March 22, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of 1stColonial Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Robert C. Faix, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           theReport fully complies with the requirements of section 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   /s/ Robert C. Faix |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Robert C. Faix                 |
| Chief Financial Officer        |
| May 11, 2004                   |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

WRITTEN STATEMENT 

PURSUANT TO 

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350 

 

The undersigned, Richard A.Meier, the Chief Financial Officer of Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certifies to the best of his knowledge that: 

 

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarterly period ended March 28, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and 

 

(ii) the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: May 1, 2003 

 

/s/    RICHARD A. MEIER                

Richard A. Meier, 

Corporate Vice President and 

Chief Financial Officer

 

**A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. and will be retained by Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**
Employee Stock Plan, as amended and restated



 Exhibit 10(c), Form 10-K 

Kansas City Life Insurance Company 

FIFTEENTH AMENDMENT 
 Kansas City Life

 Employee Stock Plan 

THIS FIFTEENTH AMENDMENT to the Kansas City Life Employee Stock Plan, effective December 1, 2006, is entered into by and between
Kansas City Life Insurance Company, a corporation organized and existing under the Laws of the State of Missouri, and Charles R. Duffy, Jr., Tracy W. Knapp and Mark A. Milton, Successor Trustees. 

 

	 	1.	 For valuation purposes in the Kansas City Life Employee Stock Plan, the price of the Kansas City Life stock shall be determined using the volume
weighted average price for all business days in the last month of the calendar quarter. 


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
Kansas City Life Insurance Company has caused this Fifteenth Amendment to the Plan and Trust to be executed by its authorized Officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto affixed, and the Trustees have executed the Amendment on the date first
above written. 
  

			
	KANSAS CITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ J. Todd Salash

		
	 Its:
	 	 Vice President




ATTEST: 
  

			
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Cheryl Keefer

		
	 Its:
	 	 Assistant Secretary



 

	
	 /s/ Charles R. Duffy, Jr.

	
	 /s/ Mark A. Milton

	
	 /s/ Tracy W. Knapp.

	 TRUSTEES
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT (24)(ii)

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         The undersigned does hereby appoint G. Peter D'Aloia, J. Paul McGrath
and Mary Elizabeth Gustafsson as his true and lawful attorneys to sign American
Standard Companies Inc. (the "Company") Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001, and any amendments thereto, on behalf of the
undersigned as a director of the Company, and to file the same, with any
exhibits thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission; each of said
attorneys shall have the power to act hereunder with or without the others.


                      Signature                        Date


               /s/ Steven E. Anderson            February 7, 2002
           -------------------------------
                (Steven E. Anderson)

                 /s/ Jared L. Cohon              February 7, 2002
           -------------------------------
                  (Jared L. Cohon)

              /s/ Edward E. Hagenlocker          February 7, 2002
           -------------------------------
               (Edward E. Hagenlocker)

                /s/ James F. Hardymon            February 7, 2002
           -------------------------------
                 (James F. Hardymon)

                /s/ Roger W. Parsons             February 7, 2002
           -------------------------------
                 (Roger W. Parsons)

                /s/ J. Danford Quayle            February 7, 2002
           -------------------------------
                (J. Danforth Quayle)

                /s/ David M. Roderick            February 7, 2002
           -------------------------------
                 (David M. Roderick)
AMENDMENT TO WARRANT TO PURCHASE COMMON STOCK


        THIS AMENDMENT TO WARRANT TO PURCHASE COMMON STOCK (the “Amendment”) is made as of February __, 2011, by and between KeyOn Communications Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and ______________, (the “Holder”).


        RECITALS


        A,        The Company issued a Warrant to Purchase Common Stock to the Holder on or about February 19, 2010 (the “Warrant”).


        B.        The Company and Holder desire to amend the Agreement as set forth below.


        AGREEMENT


        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein, the sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


        1.         The “Warrant Price” is hereby amended to be reduced from $1.50 per share to $0.50 per share.


        2.         Section 1(a) “Exercise of Warrant” is hereby amended to be deleted in its entirety and to be replaced as follows:


        (a)       The Holder may exercise this Warrant according to its terms by surrendering this Warrant to the Company at the address set forth in Section 11, together with the form of exercise attached hereto duly executed by the Holder, accompanied by cash, certified check or bank draft in payment of the Warrant Price, in lawful money of the United States of
        America, for the number of shares of the Warrant Stock specified in such form of exercise, or as otherwise provided in this Warrant, prior to 5:30 p.m., Pacific Time, on February 19, 2015 (the “Expiration Date”).


         


        [Remainder of page was intentionally left blank.]

        


        

        

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Amendment and Waiver as of the date first written above.


        	 	KEYON COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
	 	 
	 	By:	 	 
	 	 	Name:
	 	 	Title:
	 	 
	 	HOLDER
	 	 
	 	By:	 	 
	 	 	Name:
	 	 	Title:
No. 09-1022.

#### Bayer Schering Pharma AG, et al., Petitioners v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.

559 U.S. 1106, 130 S. Ct. 2404,

176 L. Ed. 2d 923,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3803.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

*924Same case below, 575 F.3d 1341.
exv10w24






Exhibit 10.24




CRESTWOOD MIDSTREAM PARTNERS LP

PHANTOM UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT




	 	 	 	 	 

	Director:

	 	 

	 	 
	Number of Phantom Units:

	 	 

	 	 
	Date of Grant:

	 	 

	 	 






     1. Under the terms and conditions of the Crestwood Midstream Partners LP Third Amended and
Restated 2007 Equity Plan (the “Plan”), a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein
by reference, Crestwood Midstream Partners LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”),
grants to the individual whose name is set forth above (the “Director”) the number of Phantom Units
set forth above. Terms not defined in this Agreement have the meanings set forth in the Plan.



     2. One-third (1/3rd) of the Phantom Units will become vested on the fifteenth day
of January of the first calendar year beginning after the Date of Grant and on each of the
following two anniversaries of that date, provided that the Director has remained a member of the
Board through each such date (and further provided that in no event will the Director become
entitled to receive a fraction of a Unit). If the Director ceases to be a member of the Board, all
nonvested Phantom Units will be forfeited immediately. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event
of a Change in Control while the Director is a member of the Board, any nonvested Phantom Units
will automatically become 100% vested.



     3. Each Phantom Unit will entitle the Director to receive one Unit with respect to each such
Phantom Unit that becomes vested. Payment will be evidenced by book entry registration (or by a
certificate registered in the name of the Director) as of the date that the Phantom Units become
vested in accordance with Section 2.



     4. The Director will have none of the rights of a unitholder of the Partnership with respect
to any Units underlying the Phantom Units, including the right to vote such Units or receive any
distributions that may be paid thereon until such time, if any, that the Director has been
determined to be a unitholder of record by the Partnership’s transfer agent or one or more
certificates of Units are delivered to the Director in settlement thereof.



     5. The Director hereby accepts and agrees to be bound by all the terms and conditions of the
Plan and this Agreement. Any amendment to the Plan will be deemed to be an amendment to this
Agreement to the extent that the Plan amendment is applicable hereto; provided, however, that no
amendment will adversely affect the rights of the Director under this Agreement without the
Director’s consent.


ACCEPTED:




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	
 	 	 
	Signature of Director 	 	 
	 	 	 


2011 Director Units Non-elective
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; “Pathogenesis of Rett Syndrome”.                    

*Date:*                         April 3, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Norman Chang, Ph.D., Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, Md 20892. (301) 496-1485,                         *changn@mail.nih.gov*
      ( print page 10259)    
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 3, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

 [FR Doc. E9-4978 Filed 3-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
No. 09-8457.

#### Octavio Delvillar, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 957, 130 S. Ct. 1553,

176 L. Ed. 2d 143,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1457.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
No. 09-9873.

#### Phelix Henry Frazier, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1090, 130 S. Ct. 2395,

176 L. Ed. 2d 765,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3660.

April 26, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
No. 09-9137.

#### Keith Robert Caldwell, Sr., Petitioner v. United States Tax Court, et al.

559 U.S. 1108, 130 S. Ct. 2404,

176 L. Ed. 2d 926,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3775.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 360 Fed. Appx. 161.
No. 09-9360.

#### Sheldon Thomas Cain, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1054, 130 S. Ct. 2356,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3035.

176 L. Ed. 2d 571,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 349 Fed. Appx. 169.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Kenneth Hicks, President and a director of Argentex Mining Corporation (Principal Executive Officer), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Argentex Mining Corporation for the interim period ended October 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Argentex Mining Corporation

Dated:  December 14, 2006

 

/s/ Kenneth Hicks                                            

Kenneth Hicks

President and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Argentex Mining Corporation and will be retained by Argentex Mining Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 09-9356.

#### James Albert Bronnenberg, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1045, 130 S. Ct. 2083,

176 L. Ed. 2d 429,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2774.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 353 Fed. Appx. 939.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS E ASTLAND , T EXAS J UDGMENT

Unique Staff Leasing, Ltd., * From the 29th District Court Self

- Insured, of Palo Pinto County, Trial Court No. C44659

.
Vs. No. 11

- 14

- 00309

- CV * July 2 9 , 2016
Kenley Cates, as beneficiary of * Opinion by Wright, C.J. Kody Ryan Cates, deceased, (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)
This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion,

w e reverse the trial court’s judgment as it relates to the award of attorney’s fees,
and we render judgment that Appellee take nothing as to her claim for attorney’s fees. In all other respects, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed one

- half against Unique Staff Leasing, Ltd., Self

- Ins ured, and one

- half against Kenley Cates, as beneficiary of Kody Ryan Cates, deceased.