alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5107 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 3, 2006 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1400 West Jordan Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ‘‘Earl D. Hutto Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
2 

HR 5107 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 1400 West Jordan Street in Pensacola, Florida, 

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Earl D. Hutto Post 

5 Office Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Earl D. Hutto Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 2, 2006. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Joseph Donald KOPE, Jr.

No. COA18-752

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 19, 2019

Attorney General Joshua H. Stein, by Assistant Attorney General Joseph L. Hyde, for the State.

Appellate Defender Glenn Gerding, by Assistant Appellate Defender Nicholas C. Woomer-Deters, for defendant-appellant.

BRYANT, Judge.

Joseph Donald Kope, Jr. ("defendant") appeals from an order denying his motion for post-conviction DNA testing. After careful review, we affirm.

On 2 August 2004, defendant pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to first-degree murder, robbery with a dangerous weapon, assault on a law enforcement officer with a firearm, felony breaking and entering, and felony larceny. In exchange for his guilty plea, the State agreed not to seek the death penalty and dismissed several additional pending charges. The trial court sentenced defendant to life imprisonment and consecutive terms of 51 to 71 and 22 to 36 months of imprisonment. Defendant did not appeal.

On 22 April 2016, defendant filed *pro se* motions to locate and preserve evidence and for post-conviction DNA testing pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-269. On 13 September 2016, the trial court entered an order requiring the preservation of evidence. On 7 October 2016, the trial court appointed counsel for defendant. On 3 April 2017, defendant, through counsel, filed an amended motion for post-conviction DNA testing. On 22 December 2017, the trial court entered an order denying defendant's motion for post-conviction DNA testing. Defendant filed written notice of appeal on 10 January 2018.

On 24 August 2018, defendant filed a petition for writ of certiorari in recognition of the fact that his notice of appeal was untimely and did not indicate service upon the State. *See* N.C.R. App. P. 4 (2019). In our discretion, we grant defendant's petition for writ of certiorari.

Counsel appointed to represent defendant has been unable to identify any issue with sufficient merit to support a meaningful argument for relief on appeal and asks that this Court conduct its own review of the record for possible prejudicial error. Counsel has also shown to the satisfaction of this Court that he has complied with the requirements of *Anders v. California* , 386 U.S. 738, 18 L.Ed. 2d 493 (1967), and *State v. Kinch* , 314 N.C. 99, 331 S.E.2d 665 (1985), by advising defendant of his right to file written arguments with this Court and providing him with the documents necessary for him to do so. Defendant has failed to file any written arguments with this Court, and a sufficient amount of time for him to do so has passed.

In accordance with *Anders* and *Kinch* , we have fully examined the record to determine whether any issues of arguable merit appear therein. We have been unable to find any possible prejudicial error and conclude that defendant's appeal is wholly frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's order denying defendant's motion for post-conviction DNA testing.

AFFIRMED.

Report per Rule 30(e).

Judges TYSON and ARROWOOD concurs.
EXHIBIT 10.3

 

ENDORSEMENT TO 10% SENIOR SECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTE

 

Precision Optics Corporation, Inc.
 New York, New York
 February 25, 2011

 

The 10% Senior Secured Convertible Note dated June 25, 2008 and amended December 11, 2008, June 25, 2010, July 26, 2010, September 15, 2010, October 15, 2010, November 15, 2010, November 30, 2010, December 1, 2010, December 3, 2010, December 17, 2010, January 10, 2011, January 24, 2011, and February 7, 2011 (the “Note”) of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), payable to the order of Special Situations Fund III, QP, L.P. (the “Holder”) in an aggregate principal amount of $275,000 and to which the Endorsement is affixed is hereby amended in the following respects:

 

1.             The term “Stated Maturity Date” is hereby restated to be “March 11, 2011.”

 

2.                                       Except as expressly amended by this Endorsement, the Note remains in full force and effect and the Company hereby reconfirms its obligations thereunder.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Endorsement to be duly executed, and the Holder has caused this Endorsement to be duly accepted, by their respective duly authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.

 

 

	
 
    	
PRECISION   OPTICS CORPORATION, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By   
    	
/s/   Joseph N. Forkey
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name   Joseph N.. Forkey
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
    
	
Accepted:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
SPECIAL   SITUATIONS FUND III QP, L.P.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:   
    	
/s/   Adam Stettner
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:   Adam Stettner
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:   General Partner
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
**PURSUANT TO**
**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alion Science and TechnologyCorporation (the “Corporation”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Bahman Atefi, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCorporation.   Date: May 17, 2004      By: /s/ Bahman Atefi   Name: Bahman Atefi Title: Chief Executive Officer
Joyce L. Connery, Chair

Thomas A. Summers, Vice Chair

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES

SAFETY BOARD

Washington, DC 20004-2901

 February 20, 2024 

The Honorable Jennifer Granholm

Secretary of Energy

U.S. Department of Energy 

1000 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20585-1000 

Dear Secretary Granholm: 

On December 5, 2023, the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) sent a letter

to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) that noted safety concerns with two key proposed 

changes to DOE Order 425.1D, Verification of Readiness to Start Up or Restart Nuclear 

Facilities. The Board requested a report and briefing from DOE within 45 days regarding 

DOE’s path forward on the revision to the order. 

On January 31, 2024, DOE conveyed its need for an additional 90 days to evaluate and 

coordinate its response to the Board’s concerns. The Board has no objection to DOE’s request 

for a 90-day extension. The Board is pleased to hear that DOE intends to provide its response 

prior to issuing the revised order. 

 Sincerely, 

 

 Joyce L. Connery 

 Chair

c: Mr. Todd LaPointe, Director, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security 

 Mr. Joe Olencz, Director, Office of the Departmental Representative to the Board

.,,._,.ao,, 

~ , ~ 

ii, ~ 
1. 

2. 

AFFIRMATION OF BOARD VOTING RECORD

SUBJECT: RFBA by Chair Joyce L. Connery - Directive for DOE Order 425.1

Doc Control#: 2024-100-0012

The Board acted on the above document on 03/04/2024. The document was Approved.

The votes were recorded as:

APRVD DISAPRVD ABSTAIN NOT 

PARTICIPATING COMMENT DATE

Joyce L. Connery 02/20/2024

Thomas Summers 02/20/2024

This Record contains a summary of voting on this matter together with the individual vote sheets, views 

and comments of the Board Members.

Shelby Qualls

Executive Secretary to the Board

Attachments:

Voting Summary

Board Member Vote Sheets

.., 

.., 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 
DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

NOTATIONAL VOTE RESPONSE SHEET

FROM: Joyce L. Connery

SUBJECT: RFBA by Chair Joyce L. Connery - Directive for DOE Order 425.1

Doc Control#: 2024-100-0012

DATE: 02/20/2024

VOTE: Approved

COMMENTS:

None

Joyce L. Connery
DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

NOTATIONAL VOTE RESPONSE SHEET

FROM: Thomas Summers

SUBJECT: RFBA by Chair Joyce L. Connery - Directive for DOE Order 425.1

Doc Control#: 2024-100-0012

DATE: 02/20/2024

VOTE: Approved

COMMENTS:

None

Thomas Summers
No. 09-7945.

#### Marcia E. Wimberly, Petitioner v. Elbert Royal, et al.

559 U.S. 1088, 130 S. Ct. 2144,

176 L. Ed. 2d 761,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3226.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

*762Former decision, 559 U.S. 946, 130 S. Ct. 1518, 176 L. Ed. 2d 125, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 1343.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7829
PEDRO GARCIA QUINTERO, Plaintiff - Appellant, and JOSE ARELLANO; VICTOR HERNANDEZ; ANTONIO HERNANDEZ; LORENZO ROJAS; JUAN HERRERA; ARTURO NAVARRETE; FLORENTINO BOJORQUEZ, Plaintiffs, versus STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-98-703-5-H) Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 21, 1999 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Pedro Garcia Quintero, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Pedro Garcia Quintero appeals the district court’s order dismissing several of the 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) claims as frivolous, but allowing several other claims to proceed. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealableinterlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Congressional Testimonies 2024

Joomla! - the dynamic portal engine and content management system

- DNI Haines Opening Statement As Delivered on the 2024 Annual Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community On March 11, 2024, Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines delivered opening testimony at a Senate Select Committee on Intelligence hearing for the Annual Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community. The opening testimony and public hearing is available to view here, and remarks as delivered are below.
Exhibit 10.45

 

THERAVANCE, INC.

 

December     , 2010

 

[Name]

[Address]

[Address]

 

Dear             :

 

You hold the outstanding restricted stock unit award(s) listed on Exhibit A granted to you pursuant to the Theravance, Inc. (the “Company) non-employee director compensation program (each, an “RSU” and collectively, the “RSUs”).  To avoid potential adverse tax consequences imposed by Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), each RSU is hereby amended as follows:

 

Change in Control.  For purposes of your RSU, a “Change in Control” shall have the definition set forth in the Company’s 2004 Equity Incentive Plan provided that the transaction or occurrence also constitutes a “change in control event” under Treasury Regulation 1.409A-3(a)(5).

 

Separation from Service.  For purposes of settlement of your RSU, a termination or cessation of your service shall be construed as a “separation from service” within the meaning of Code Section 409A.  This interpretation is not intended to expand the definition of service to include as a settlement event any event that is not already a settlement event or to narrow the definition of service to eliminate as a settlement event any event that is not already a settlement event, except as necessary to satisfy the requirements of Treasury Regulation 1.409A-3(a)(1).

 

Interpretation.  Your RSU shall be interpreted to comply with the requirements of Code Section 409A so that your RSUs will not be subject to the additional tax and penalties imposed by Code Section 409A(a)(1).

 

Each agreement evidencing your outstanding RSUs is hereby amended to reflect the foregoing.

 











 

You may indicate your agreement with this amendment of your RSU award(s) by signing and dating the enclosed duplicate original and returning it to me.  This agreement may be executed in two counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but both of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

 

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
Very   truly yours,
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
THERAVANCE, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:
    	
 
    


 

 

I have read and accept this amendment:

 

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
[Name]
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Dated:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
				


 

2











 

Exhibit A
 Restricted Stock Unit Awards

 

	
Date of Grant
    	
 
    	
Number of Restricted Stock Units
No. D-2468.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Peter Paul Mitrano.

559 U.S. 1002, 130 S. Ct. 1948,

176 L. Ed. 2d 411,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2345.

March 22, 2010.

Peter Paul Mitrano, of Merrifield, Virginia, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
No. 01

- 14

- 00871

- CV

PLAYA VISTA LP, MORGAN

- §

MULTI FAMILY LLC, and SCOTT §

MORGAN §

Appellant §

§

v. §

§ COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS

LAKESIDE RE, LP, GSRE, INC., §

and, AVI RON § FIRST DISTRICT

Appellee §

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF

Appellants, Playa Vista LP, Morgan

- Multi Family LLC, and Scott Morgan

,

asks the Court to extend the time to file their Appellate Brief.

Introduction

1. This motion is filed before the Appellate Brief is due. There is no specific

deadline to file this motion to extend time. See Tex. R. App. Proc. 38.6(d).

2. The parties have agreed to this motion.

Argument & Authorities

3. The Court may grant an extension of time under Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 38.6(d) and 10.5(b).

4. The deadline to file the Appellate Brief is February 26 , 201 5 . Appellant s

request an additional thirty (30) days to file the Appellate Brief, extending the

deadline to Monday, March 30 , 2015. ACCEPTED

01-14-00871-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

2/23/2015 12:46:20 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK5. For purposes of previous and upcoming scheduling conflicts, counsel for

Appellants request an extension

.

6. An extension/stay was previously requested due to summary judgment hearings

in the 270 th Judicial District Court of Harris C o unty in this cause, causing the

case to be abated. The appeal was reinstated last month. Therein, this is

Ap pellants’ first request for an extension to file

.

Conclusion and Prayer

7. For the reasons stated above, Appellant s ask the Court to grant an extension of

time to file the Appellate Brief until March 30 , 2015.

Respectfully Submitted,

PARANJPE & MAHADASS LLP

/s/ Tej Paranjpe___________

Tej R. Paranjpe

State Bar Number: 24071829

3701 Kirby, Suite 530

Houston, Texas 77098

832.667.7700 Telephone

832.202.2018 Facsimile

tparanjpe@pandmllp.com

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT SCERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I ce rtify that I have conferred with opposing counsel, Jerry Hecht , by email,

and he has agreed and is unopposed to Appellant’s Motion to Extend Time to File

Appellate Brief.

/s/ Tej Paranjpe_________

TEJ R PARANJPE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, in accordance with Rule 9.5 of the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure, I have served the foregoing document upon the following

parties by facsimile or email correspondence:

Jerry Hecht

trialatt@aol.com

Dated: February 23, 2015

/s/ Tej Paranjpe_________

TEJ R PARANJPE
No. 09-9245.

#### Darryl McGore, Petitioner v. Officer Lutz, et al.

559 U.S. 1096, 130 S. Ct. 2378,

176 L. Ed. 2d 774,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3503.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2017348EN.01000101.xml

| 17.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 348/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 348/1

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case M.8638 — Shell Midstream Partners/Crestwood Permian Basin Holdings/Crestwood Permian Basin)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 348/01)

Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004

On 8 September 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration between Shell Midstream Partners LP and Crestwood Permian Basin Holdings LLC. On 8 October 2017, the notifying party/ies informed the Commission that it/they withdrew its/their notification.

---
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 504

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 21, 2005

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4960 West Washington Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, as the ‘‘Ray Charles Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 504 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 4960 West Washington Boulevard in Los Ange4 les, California, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Ray 

5 Charles Post Office Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Ray Charles Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives April 20, 2005. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4995 Engrossed in House (EH)]







109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4995

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 7 Columbus Avenue in Tuckahoe, New York, as the ``Ronald Bucca Post 
                               Office''.


_______________________________________________________________________


_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 7 Columbus Avenue in Tuckahoe, New York, as the ``Ronald Bucca Post 
                               Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RONALD BUCCA POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 7 Columbus Avenue in Tuckahoe, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Ronald Bucca Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ronald 
Bucca Post Office''.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session



_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 7 Columbus Avenue in Tuckahoe, New York, as the ``Ronald Bucca Post 
                               Office''.`
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10601-10602]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4990]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism, Initial Review Group, Biomedical Research Review 
Subcommittee.
    Date: June 8-9, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Washington Plaza Hotel, 10 Thomas Circle NW., Washington, 
DC 20005.
    Contact Person: Philippe Marmillot, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on 
Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm. 2019, Bethesda, 
MD 20892. 301-443-2861. [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research

[[Page 10602]]

Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, 
Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 
93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center 
Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 4, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-4990 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
No. 09-9933.

#### Mark David Dyer, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1114, 130 S. Ct. 2422,

176 L. Ed. 2d 936,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3848.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 589 F.3d 520.