alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit No. 32.1
----------------
Form 10-QSB
Basic Empire Corporation
File No. 0-49608

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of Basic  Empire  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy
P. Halter,  Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: July 26, 2004                               By:   /s/ Timothy P. Halter
      -------------                                  ---------------------------
                                                               Timothy P. Halter
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to Basic  Empire  Corporation  and will be  retained  by Basic  Empire
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
No. 09-1197.

#### Fred VanNatta, et al., Petitioners v. Oregon Government Ethics Commission, fka Oregon Government Standards and Practices Commission, et al.

560 U.S. 906, 130 S. Ct. 3313,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1187,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3919.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Oregon denied.

Same case below, 347 Or. 449, 222 P.3d 1077.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7157

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

YOUNG DOWELL, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior 

District Judge. (1:04-cr-00066-1)

Submitted: September 11, 2012 Decided: September 14, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Young Dowell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Miller A. Bushong, III, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Beckley, West Virginia; 

John J. Frail, Steven Loew, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Young Dowell, Jr., appeals a district court order 

denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c) (2006). The district court found Dowell was not 

eligible for a reduction under the recent amendments to the 

Sentencing Guidelines because his sentence was based not on a 

quantity of crack cocaine, but on his career offender status. 

We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion 

denying Dowell’s motion for a sentence reduction. United 

States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (stating 

standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Massimiliano Pozzoni, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Falcon Natural Gas Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Falcon Natural Gas Corp.

DATE: November 15, 2004                    By: /s/ Massimiliano Pozzoni
                                              -------------------------
                                              Massimiliano Pozzoni
                                              Principal Financial Officer

<PAGE>
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Auditors

The
Board of Directors
Key Production Company, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrations statements (Nos. 33-62355, 333-83955, 333-83953 and 333-53116) on Form S-8 and registration statement
(No. 333-83879) on Form S-3 of Key Production Company, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated March 6, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Key Production
Company, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the two years then ended, which report appears
in the December 31, 2001, Annual Report on Form 10-K of Key Production Company, Inc.

| |  | KPMG LLP
| |  | --------

Denver,
Colorado
March 20, 2002

---

QuickLinks
No. 09-6937.

#### Crystal Lamay, Petitioner v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security.

559 U.S. 962, 130 S. Ct. 1503,

176 L. Ed. 2d 152,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1080.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 562 F.3d 503.
#### Inter-County Telephone & Telegraph Company, a Corporation, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. R. O. Bozarth, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed May 15, 1928.

*Henderson, Franklin*and *Christie,*for Appellant;

*L. J. Bobbins,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

In an action of assumpsit on common counts for money payable for goods, wares and merchandise bargained and sold, for material furnished and for labor done and performed, there was a trial on a plea of never was indebted, and verdict and judgment were rendered for the full amount of the claim with interest. The defendant took writ of error. Even if the evidence be considered as *940legally sufficient to show liability of the defendant on the ground that it authorized or ratified an indebtedness to the plaintiff, there is not sufficient evidence of an agreed price or of the reasonable value of the items constituting the alleged indebtedness of the defendant to the plaintiff. See Chase & Co. v. Miller, 81 Fla. 472, 88 So. 313; C. H. & N. Ry. Co. v. Burwell, 56 Fla. 217, 48 So. 213.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J. and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
No. 09-8525.

#### Robert T. Pritchard, Sr., Petitioner v. Fayette County Election Bureau, et al.

559 U.S. 1011, 130 S. Ct. 1888,

176 L. Ed. 2d 372,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2646.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania denied.
No. 09-9851.

#### Keith Jennings, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1101, 130 S. Ct. 2394,

176 L. Ed. 2d 783,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3622.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 355 Fed. Appx. 440.
EXHIBIT 32.2





Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with the quarterly report of West Bancorporation, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2020 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas R. Gulling, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of West Bancorporation, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of West Bancorporation, Inc.








July 23, 2020








/s/ Douglas R. Gulling


Douglas R. Gulling


Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

- - - - - - - -
NO. 22-0278 FELIX SORKIN, INDIVIDUALLY, GENERAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., AND PRECISION-HAYES INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. P.T. ATLAS MANUFACTURING, L.L.C. § § § § § § Dallas County, 5th District.

December 16, 2022 Petitioners' petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

 I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under the date shown. It is further ordered that petitioners, FELIX SORKIN, INDIVIDUALLY, GENERAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., AND PRECISION-HAYES INTERNATIONAL, INC., pay all costs incurred on this petition. WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this the 19th day of January, 2023.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk
# C_2017292EN.01000301.xml

| 2.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8577 — Norsk Hydro/Sapa)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 292/04)

On 17 August 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8577. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8577. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
exv10w49






Exhibit 10.49




Amendment
to Stock Option and

Restricted/Performance Stock Terms






     
This Amendment (the “Amendment”) to Stock Option and Restricted/Performance Stock Agreements issued
under the SLM Corporation Employee Stock Option Plan, SLM Corporation Management Incentive
Plan, SLM Corporation Incentive Plan (as amended and restated October 2006), and SLM Corporation
2009-2012 Incentive Plan (collectively, the “Plans”) effective as of January 27, 2011
(the “Amendment Date”) by SLM Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under
the laws of the State of Delaware (the “Company”).



     
WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of
the Company has approved amendments to the terms of all restricted and performance
stock and stock units and all option awards issued under the Plans, vested and
unvested, and which are outstanding and not exercised on the Amendment Date
(the “Awards”), to allow the Awards to continue to vest according to their
original terms, notwithstanding (i) termination of employment by the Company
other than for cause or misconduct, as those terms are defined by the Company
in its discretion, or (ii) voluntary termination of employment and the employee
meets the Company's retirement eligibility criteria as determined by the
Company, and in the case of all Awards that are stock options, to permit
the grantee one year from any vesting event to exercise any option Awards; and




     
WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Awards in accordance with the
amendments approved by the Committee;



     
NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Awards as follows:





     1. 
Amendment of the Awards.
Effective January 27, 2011, all Awards shall continue to vest according to the original terms of such
awards, notwithstanding (i) termination of an employee’s employment by the Company or (ii) an
employee’s voluntary termination of employment and the employee meets the retirement eligibility
criteria under Company policy, as determined by the Company, and in such event, i.e., employment
termination by the Company or eligible retirement, each portion of the Options once vested, will
be exercisable for one year after such portion vests.





     2. 
Miscellaneous.  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the amendments herein are not
intended to affect  equity granted to non-management members of the Company’s Board of Directors
or equity granted under any other plans of the Company, including employee stock purchase plans
and 401(k) plans.








1
No. 09-8291.

#### David Kenneth Christian, Petitioner v. Lynn Dingle, Warden.

559 U.S. 979, 130 S. Ct. 1704,

176 L. Ed. 2d 193,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2156.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 577 F.3d 907.
ex10_59.htm









Exhibit 10.59


 


FOURTH AMENDMENT TO


THE ALLIANCE DATA SYSTEMS 401(k) AND RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN


(amended and restated as of January 1, 2008)







ADS Alliance Data Systems, Inc. hereby adopts this Amendment No. 4 to the Alliance Data Systems 401(k) and Retirement Savings Plan, amended and restated as of January 1, 2008 (the “Plan”), effective as provided below. This amendment is intended to comply with the Heroes Earnings Assistance and Relief Tax Act of 2008 (“HEART Act”).







1.           Section 1.15(B) of the Plan is amended by adding a new sentence, effective January 1, 2009, at the end of the first paragraph, to read as follows:







Thus, effective January 1, 2009, Compensation shall include “differential wage payments” within the meaning of section 3401(h)(2) of the Code to a Participant who is performing qualified military service described in section 414(u)(5) of the Code.







2.           Section 3.9 of the Plan is replaced in its entirety, effective January 1, 2007, to read as follows, with a corresponding change in the table of contents to reflect the new section title:







3.9           Qualified Military Service.







(a)           Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, contributions, benefits and service credit with respect to qualified military service will be provided in accordance with section 414(u) of the Code.







(b)           Effective January 1, 2007, the designated beneficiary of a Participant who dies while performing qualified military service (as defined under section 414(u) of the Code) shall be entitled to any additional benefits (other than benefit accruals relating to the period of qualified military service) that would be provided under the Plan had the Participant died as an Employee, in accordance with section 401(a)(37) of the Code.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been executed on this 14th day of December 2010, but effective as provided above.














	  	ADS ALLIANCE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.    
	 	 
	 	 
	  	
By:  

	
/s/ Calvin Hilton
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended June 30, 2004, (the "Report") by Dimensional Visions,  Inc., each
of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Report complies in all material  respects with the requirements of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
          amended, and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of  the
          operations of the Registrant.


Dated:  November 15, 2004

                                        /s/ Preston J. Shea
                                        -------------------
                                        Name:  Preston J. Shea
                                        Title:   President


                                        /s/ Preston J. Shea
                                        -------------------
                                        Name:  Preston J. Shea
                                        Title: Principal Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 
 
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of ULURU Inc.
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant
 to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of ULURU Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of ULURU Inc. does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:
 
 (1.)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2.)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 
 Date: November 15, 2010

/s/ Terrance K. WallbergTerrance K. WallbergVice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
No. 09-9193.

#### Sean Swain, Petitioner v. Robert Welch, Warden.

559 U.S. 1095, 130 S. Ct. 2375,

176 L. Ed. 2d 772,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3519.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.

Same case below, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1521, 918 N.E.2d 524.
No. 09-9407.

#### Bernard J. Mantzke, Petitioner v. Greg Province, Warden, et al.

559 U.S. 1110, 130 S. Ct. 2413,

176 L. Ed. 2d 930,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3781.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 351 Fed. Appx. 293.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# Date and Time:

Tuesday, March 10, 2009, and Wednesday March 11, 2009 at 10 a.m.

# Place:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# Status:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# Items To Be Discussed:

 

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

# Person to Contact for Information:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

 [FR Doc. E9-4821 Filed 3-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. 

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-40286

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SAUL DIAZ-LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-99-CR-353-1

--------------------

December 14, 2000

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Saul Diaz-Lopez appeals his sentence following his guilty

plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). Diaz-Lopez argues that

his prior felony conviction was an element of the offense of the

instant conviction. Diaz-Lopez acknowledges that his argument is

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224

(1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for possible Supreme

Court review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 120 S. Ct. 2348
No. 00-40286

-2-

(2000). Diaz-Lopez's argument is foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres, 523 U.S. at 235. 

 AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Stanley Demon DOWD

No. 454P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019.

Leslie C. Rawls, Attorney at Law, for Dowd, Stanley Demon.

Tamara S. Zmuda, Assistant Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**ORDER**

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 27th of December 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 27th of December 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
No. 09-7733.

#### Mark C. Jackson, Petitioner v. Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

559 U.S. 1088, 130 S. Ct. 2144,

176 L. Ed. 2d 761,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3274.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 909, 130 S. Ct. 1292, 175 L. Ed. 2d 1083, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 832.