alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 09-9430.

#### Tyrone Santos, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1055, 130 S. Ct. 2365,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3081.

176 L. Ed. 2d 573,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 589 F.3d 759.
EXHIBIT  99.0

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS




The  undersigned,  as Chief Executive Officer of Talram Corporation, does hereby
certify  that Talram's annual report for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 on Form
10-QSB  which  contains audited financial statements for the quarter ending June
30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that
information  contained  in  this  report  fairly  represents,  in  all  material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Talram
Corporation.



___________________
Joel  Schonfeld,  President
Talram  Corporation
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4972 

To permit certain school districts in Illinois to be reconstituted for purposes 

of determining assistance under the Impact Aid program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2006 

Mr. KIRK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To permit certain school districts in Illinois to be reconstituted for purposes of determining assistance under the 

Impact Aid program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR IMPACT AID PAYMENT. 

4 (a) LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES.—Notwith5 standing section 8013(9)(B) of the Elementary and Sec6 ondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)(B)), 

7 North Chicago Community Unit School District 187, 

8 North Shore District 112, and Township High School Dis9 trict 113 in Lake County, Illinois, and Glenview Public 

10 School District 34 and Glenbrook High School District 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4972 IH 

1 225 in Cook County, Illinois, shall be considered local edu2 cational agencies as such term is used in and for purposes 

3 of title VIII of such Act. 

4 (b) COMPUTATION.—Notwithstanding any other pro5 vision of law, federally connected children (as determined 

6 under section 8003(a) of the Elementary and Secondary 

7 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7703(a))) who are in 

8 attendance in the North Shore District 112, Township 

9 High School District 113, Glenview Public School District 

10 34, and Glenbrook High School District 225 described in 

11 subsection (a), shall be considered to be in attendance in 

12 the North Chicago Community Unit School District 187 

13 described in subsection (a), solely for purposes of com14 puting the amount that the North Chicago Community 

15 Unit School District 187 is eligible to receive under sub16 section (b) or (d) of such section, if— 

17 (1) such school districts have entered into an 

18 agreement for such students to be so considered and 

19 for the equittable apportionment among all such 

20 school districts of any amount received by the North 

21 Chicago Community Unit School District 187 under 

22 such section; and 

23 (2) any amount apportioned among all such 

24 school districts pursuant to paragraph (1) is used by 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4972 IH 

1 such school districts only for the direct provision of 

2 educational services. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
No. 09-9326.

#### Liysa Northon, Petitioner v. Ann Rule, et al.

559 U.S. 1097, 130 S. Ct. 2382,

176 L. Ed. 2d 776,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3585.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 905.
# C_2017134EN.01000301.xml

| 28.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/3

---

Special Report No 4/2017

‘Protecting the EU budget from irregular spending: The Commission made increasing use of preventive measures and financial corrections in Cohesion during the 2007-2013 period’

(2017/C 134/03)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 4/2017 ‘Protecting the EU budget from irregular spending: The Commission made increasing use of preventive measures and financial corrections in Cohesion during the 2007-2013 period’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Brownie’s Marine Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
 
 1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 
 Date:
      August 13,
      2009
              By:
              /s/ Robert
      M. CarmichaelName:
              Robert
      M. CarmichaelTitle:
              Chief
      Financial Officer
 
 
 A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been provided to Brownie’s Marine Group, Inc. and will be retained by
Brownie’s Marine Group, Inc. and furnished to the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### May 27, 2005 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
RODNEY HILL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v. No. 05-3043 E.J. GALLEGOS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. (D.C. No. 04-CV-3074-RDR) (D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before BRISCOE, LUCERO, and MURPHY , Circuit Judges. After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). T he case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Rodney Hill, a federal prisoner appearing pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition w ithout prejudice. We exercise2

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. In his petition, Hill asserted he was improperly re moved from his UNICOR prison work position and that officials failed to f ollow policies and procedures for terminating prisoners from UNICOR jobs. The distri ct court noted that Hill’s allegations did not impact the legality or duration of confinement and were not appropriate for habeas review, and determined it wo uld construe the matter as a Bivens complaint. Hill objected. As a result, the courtdismissed the habeas petition without prejudice, noting Hill could prope rly file a Bivens complaint. The district court properly dismissed Hill’s § 2241 habeas petition without prejudice. A habeas proceeding attacks the fact orduration of a prisoner’s confinement and seeks the remedy of immediate relea se or a shortened period of confinement. See McIntosh v. U.S. Parole Com’n , 115 F.3d 809, 811 (10th Cir. 1997). Where a § 2241 petition is brought “challen ging prison disciplinary proceedings, such as the deprivation of good-time c redits, [it] is not challenging prison conditions.” Id. at 812. Rather, “it is challenging an action affe cting the fact or duration of the petitioner’s custody.” Id. AFFIRMED. Entered for the Court Mary Beck Briscoe Circuit Judge
No. 11-6066.

#### James D. Coningford, Petitioner v. Rhode Island.

565 U.S. 954, 132 S. Ct. 426,

181 L. Ed. 2d 277,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7274.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 640 F.3d 478.
No. 09-8824.

#### In re Charles Sweeney, Petitioner.

559 U.S. 969, 130 S. Ct. 1727,

176 L. Ed. 2d 207,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1929.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of ha-beas corpus denied.
No. 09-8770.

#### Watson Dixon, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1015, 130 S. Ct. 1904,

176 L. Ed. 2d 380,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2736.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 353 Fed. Appx. 359.
No. 09-7547.

#### Fayad Yahya Ahmed, Petitioner v. Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense.

559 U.S. 942, 130 S. Ct. 1506,

176 L. Ed. 2d 119,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1168.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
No. 09-10039.

#### In re Jimmie Odell Bruner, Petitioner.

559 U.S. 1091, 130 S. Ct. 2396,

176 L. Ed. 2d 786,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3513.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of ha-beas corpus denied.
Order entered November 

## 8 , 2012

In The 

## Court of ZippeaW jriftb IlDisstritt of Texali at 31Ballass

No. 0542-00559-CR DONALD CAINE, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F11-31232-Y



### ORDER The Court GRANTS 

### court reporter Sharon Hazlewood's motion for extension of time to file the reporter's record. We ORDER

### Ms. Hazlewood to file the reporter's record within FIFTEEN DAYS 

### from the date of this order.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7464 BOBBY JENKINS, a/k/a Ali Muqtadir, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TRACY SMITH; J. REUBEN LONG DETENTION CENTER, Defendants - Appellees, and JAMES GALMOUR, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-00-22-3-23BC) Submitted: February 8, 2001 Decided: February 14, 2001 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bobby Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se. Alexia Pittas-Giroux, STUCKEY LAW OFFICES, P.A., Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Bobby Jenkins, a South Carolina inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000). Jenkins’ case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Jenkins that the failure to file timely objections to this recommendation couldwaive appellate review of a district court based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Jenkins failed to timely object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Jenkins waived appellate review by failing to timely file objections after receiving proper notice. We accordingly dismiss the appeal as frivolous. We deny the motion for preparation of transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alion Science and Technology Corporation (the“Corporation”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John M. Hughes, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.Date: May 15, 2007       /s/ John M. Hughes     Name: John M. Hughes    Title: Chief Financial Officer
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF RIGHTS



 Exhibit 10.47 
 ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF RIGHTS UNDER  
 SHOPPING CENTER
PURCHASE AGREEMENT 
 For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged,
PHILLIPS EDISON GROUP LLC, an Ohio limited liability company (“Assignor”), hereby assigns, transfers and sets over to WESTIN STATION LLC (“Assignee”), all of Assignor’s right, title, and interest as Purchaser in and to that
certain Shopping Center Purchase and Sale Agreement dated January 27, 2012 as same may have been or may be amended, including any addendum thereto (“Agreement”) with Westin Centre, LLC (“Seller”), as Seller, with respect to
the land and improvements thereon located in Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina, more particularly described in the Agreement, including, but not limited to, its right, title and interest in and to the Deposit (as defined in the
Agreement). 
  

					
	Dated: February 21, 2012	 	PHILLIPS EDISON GROUP, LLC,
		 	an Ohio limited liability company
			
		 	By:	 	PHILLIPS EDISON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
		 		 	a Delaware limited partnership, Managing Member
			
		 	By:	 	PHILLIPS EDISON & COMPANY, INC.,
		 		 	a Maryland corporation, General Partner
			
		 	By:	 	 /s/ Robert F. Myers

		 		 	Robert F. Myers, Chief Operating Officer and President

 The undersigned, Assignee, hereby accepts the foregoing assignment and hereby assumes and agrees to
perform all of Assignor’s obligations under the Agreement and hereby releases, indemnifies and holds Assignor harmless from any loss, cost, liability or expense which may be suffered by Assignor in connection with such Agreement, except for any
such loss, cost, liability or expense resulting from the acts of Assignor in connection with the Agreement taken prior to the date of this Assignment without the applicable authorization or consent of the undersigned. 

 

					
	Dated: February 21, 2012	 	 WESTIN STATION LLC,

A Delaware limited liability company

			
		 	By:	 	 /s/ R. Mark Addy

		 		 	R. Mark Addy, President
exh10_49.htm


 













 



Exhibit 10.49


Addendum to Employment Agreement


 


Date: August 29, 2011


 


Kevin Dennis


S75W25730 Prairieside Dr


Waukesha, WI 53189












Dear Kevin,







This letter will serve as an addendum to your original Employment Agreement dated February 3, 2010 and is hereby made part of the agreement.







Said agreement is amended as follows:








	
·  

	
Effective September 1, 2011, you will be entitled to an annual salary of $170,000, payable in accordance with ZBB’s normal salaried payroll practices.  The CEO will review, at least annually, your overall compensation with a view to increasing it if, in the sole judgment of the CEO, the performance of ZBB or your services merit such an increase.







 



	
·  

	
ZBB shall be entitled to withhold from amounts to be paid to you hereunder any federal, state, or local withholding or other taxes or charges which it is required to withhold under applicable law.







 







Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.


 







 







 



	 	 Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	 ZBB ENERGY CORPORATION
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 By:          /s/ Eric Apfelbach                                       
	 	                Eric Apfelbach (Chief Executive Officer)





 


 


 


 


 




	
 N93 W14475 Whittaker Way


Menomonee Falls WI  53051 



Tel:  (262) 253 9800 Fax:  (262) 253 9822 


Email:  hbrown@zbbenergy.com 


 


www.zbbenergy.com



	  

PO Box 2047


Kardinya WA 6163


240 Barrington Street


Bibra Lake WA 6163


 Tel:  (08) 9494 2055 Fax:  (08) 9494 2066


 Email:  info@zbbenergy.com
No. 09-788.

#### Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Petitioner v. Thomas David Jordan, et al.

559 U.S. 1068, 130 S. Ct. 2094,

176 L. Ed. 2d 723,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3472.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Division, denied.
Exhibit 99.1

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of 1st Colonial Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March
31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity
and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results
     of operation of the Company.


                              /s/ Gerard M. Banmiller
                              -------------------------------
                              Gerard M. Banmiller
                              President and
                              Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  May 12, 2003


SL1 351969v1/90470.001
```

[Federal Register: November 24, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 226)]
[Notices]               
[Page 71677]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr24no10-69]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting and Roundtable Discussion.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME:  Thursday, December 2, 2010. 10-11:30 a.m. (EST). 1:30-5 
p.m. (EST).

PLACE:  U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave., Suite 
150, Washington, DC 20005, 202-566-3100.

MEETING AGENDA:  The Commission will hold a public meeting to receive 
updates on the following topics: Commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) 
products; election official mentorship project. Commissioners will 
consider other administrative matters.

ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION: The Commission will host a roundtable discussion 
with participants from the election official community and voting 
manufacturer industries to review the 2010 election.
    Members of the public may observe but not participate in EAC 
meetings unless this notice provides otherwise. Members of the public 
may use small electronic audio recording devices to record the 
proceedings. The use of other recording equipment and cameras requires 
advance notice to and coordination with the Commission's Communications 
Office.*
    * View EAC Regulations Implementing Government in the Sunshine Act.
    This meeting and hearing will be open to the public.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:  Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 
566-3100.

Alice Miller,
Chief Operating Officer, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-29791 Filed 11-22-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P
```
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CARLOS McDONALD

Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County

No. 97-02521 Chris Craft, Judge 

No. W1999-01459-CCA-R3-CD - Decided July 24, 2000

JUDGMENT

Came the appellant, Carlos McDonald, by counsel, and also came the Attorney

General on behalf of the State, and this case was heard on the record on appeal from the Criminal

Court of Shelby County; and upon consideration thereof, this Court is of the opinion that there is no

reversible error on the record and that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. 

In accordance with the Opinion filed herein, it is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by

this Court that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed, and the case is remanded to the Criminal

Court of Shelby County for the execution of the judgment of that Court and for the collection of the

costs accrued below.

It appearing that the appellant, Carlos McDonald, is indigent, costs of the appeal will

be paid by the State of Tennessee.
No. 09-1025.

#### Herbert S. Moncier, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee.

559 U.S. 1106, 130 S. Ct. 2428,

176 L. Ed. 2d 924,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3708.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 329 Fed. Appx. 636.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Entech Environmental Technologies, Inc.,
a Florida corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Burr Northrop, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
   Date: February
      20, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Burr NorthropBurr
      NorthropPresident
      and Chief
                Executive
      Officer
No. 09-9763.

#### Lawrence Jackson, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1085, 130 S. Ct. 2136,

176 L. Ed. 2d 754,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3259.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.