alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

**Exhibit        32.2**

| (1) | The                  report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                        |                                                                         |                                      |
|---------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                   |                                                                    |                                 |
| Date: November                20, 2006 | By:                                                                | /s/ Thomas                Stankovich |
|                                        | Thomas                  StankovichChief                    Financial Officer |
No. 09-10088.

#### Kelo King, Petitioner v. United States.

560 U.S. 915, 130 S. Ct. 3301,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1203,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3964.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 352 Fed. Appx. 450.
No. 11-6438.

#### Joaquin Cardona Sandoval, Petitioner v. Roddie Rushing, Warden.

565 U.S. 1064, 132 S. Ct. 764,

181 L. Ed. 2d 492,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8600.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 21, 2024

No. 04-24-00017-CR

Manuel ESPINOZA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2023CR5174

Honorable Andrew Carruthers, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, this appeal is 

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on February 21, 2024.

_____________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of February, 2024.

_____________________________

Tommy Stolhandske, Clerk of Court
No. 09-9983.

#### Phillip Thomas Cason, Petitioner v. District of Columbia Department of Corrections, et al.

560 U.S. 914, 130 S. Ct. 3314,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1200,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3920.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
No. 11-7525.

#### Demarcus L. Lewis, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 1181, 132 S. Ct. 1149,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1023,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1060.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 09-9249.

#### Rick Roy Schlotzhauer, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1024, 130 S. Ct. 1930,

176 L. Ed. 2d 397,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2366.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 356 Fed. Appx. 56.
109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4979

AN ACT

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to clarify the preference for local 

firms in the award of certain contracts for disaster relief 

activities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2

•HR 4979 EH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Local Community Re3 covery Act of 2006’’. 

4 SEC. 2. USE OF LOCAL FIRMS AND INDIVIDUALS FOR DIS5 ASTER RELIEF ACTIVITIES. 

6 Section 307 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 

7 and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5150) is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘In carrying 

9 out this section, a contract or agreement may be set aside 

10 for award based on a specific geographic area.’’. 

11 SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

12 It is the sense of Congress that the Corps of Engi13 neers should promptly implement the decision of the Gov14 ernment Accountability Office in solicitation W912EE15 06–R-0005, dated March 20, 2006.

Passed the House of Representatives March 28, 

2006. 

Attest:

Clerk. 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4979

AN ACT

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 

contracts for disaster relief activities.preference for local firms in the award of certain and Emergency Assistance Act to clarify the
No. 09-8969.

#### Michael J. Piskanin, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1103, 130 S. Ct. 2400,

176 L. Ed. 2d 788,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3531.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 1019, 130 S. Ct. 1913, 176 L. Ed. 2d 386, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 2504.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5034 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5034

To redesignate the White Rocks National Recreation Area in the State of 
  Vermont as the ``Robert T. Stafford White Rocks National Recreation 
                                Area''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 2006

 Mr. Sanders introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To redesignate the White Rocks National Recreation Area in the State of 
  Vermont as the ``Robert T. Stafford White Rocks National Recreation 
                                Area''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROBERT T. STAFFORD WHITE ROCKS NATIONAL RECREATION AREA .

    (a) Redesignation.--The White Rocks National Recreation Area in the 
State of Vermont, as established by section 202 of the Vermont 
Wilderness Act of 1984 (16 U.S.C. 460nn-1), is redesignated as the 
``Robert T. Stafford White Rocks National Recreation Area''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the recreation area 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
Robert T. Stafford White Rocks National Recreation Area.
                                 <all>
```
UAS Pilot Log: Unmanned Aircraft Systems Logbook for Drone Pilots and Operators 

FLIGHT ID / NO.: 

FLIGHT LOCATION: 

UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM: 

MANUFACTURER: 

MODEL NUMBER: 

PREFLIGHT CHECKLIST: 

• Batteries Charged & Secure 

• Aircraft Hardware OK 

❑ Equipment 8 Gear OK 

❑ Transmitter Controls OK 

PREFLIGHT NOTES: 

Month _ 

Weather. 

CREW: 

PILOT: _ 

SPOTTER: 

❑ Props OK & Tight 

❑ Software / Frmware Update 

❑ Transmitter Contrd Power ON 

❑ Aircraft Power ON 

Day Year 

❑ Compass Calibr•atfon 

❑ Camera / FPV ON 

❑ Satellite Connection 

❑ Applications / Systems ON 

I SESSION FLIGHT 

: INTERVALS 

FLIGHT TIMES 

START STOP TOTAL 

i. 

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

TOTAL HOURS 

FOR SESSION 

TOTALFORWARD 

I

TOTAL TO DATE 

POSTFLIGHT NOTES / JOURNAL ENTRIES: 

FLIGHT MAP 

I CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING ENTRIES ARE TRUE AND CORRECT: 

PILOT: SPOTTER: 

107 droneprep.com
109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4995

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 7 Columbus Avenue in Tuckahoe, New York, 

as the ‘‘Ronald Bucca Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2

•HR 4995 EH 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 7 Columbus Avenue in Tuckahoe, New York, shall 

4 be known and designated as the ‘‘Ronald Bucca Post Of5 fice’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Ronald Bucca Post Office’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 2, 2006. 

Attest:

Clerk. 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4995

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice’’. Tuckahoe, New York, as the ‘‘Ronald Bucca Post al Service located at 7 Columbus Avenue in
No. 09-8718.

#### Alfred Swain, Petitioner v. Burl Cain, Warden.

559 U.S. 1038, 130 S. Ct. 2063,

176 L. Ed. 2d 417,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2813.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 09-7778.

#### Sheena Deloache Ray, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1107, 130 S. Ct. 2401,

176 L. Ed. 2d 925,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3837.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 578 F.3d 184.
No. 09-8918.

#### Anthony Benjamin, Petitioner v. Lorettan Wallace, et al.

559 U.S. 1051, 130 S. Ct. 2346,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2940,

176 L. Ed. 2d 566,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 352 Fed. Appx. 829.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I, EdwardO. Irion, certify that:

 

1.  Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dakota Growers PastaCompany, Inc.;

 

2.  Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.  Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.  Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

 

a)  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)  Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)  Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.  Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)  Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)  Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date:March 17, 2008

 

 
|   |                    | /s/  Edward O. Irion |
|--------|-------------------------|----------------------|
|   |                    |
|   | Edward O. Irion         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
Exhibit 10.13

                      DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT DATED 12/11/00
                               LETTER OF EXTENSION
                               -------------------


1.   The term of the Distribution Agreement dated December 11, 2000 by and
between Codman and Shurtleff, Inc. and Valley Forge Scientific Corp. is hereby
extended until March 31, 2004.

2.   The Minimum Dollar Purchase Obligations for the period from January 1, 2004
to March 31, 2004 shall be one million dollars ($1,000,000).

3.   Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to
them in the Distribution Agreement.

4.   All other terms of the Distribution Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect.


                                                Codman and Shurtleff, Inc.

Dated: November 21, 2003                    By: /s/ GLEN KASHUBA
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Glen Kashuba, President

                                                Valley Forge Scientific Corp.

Dated: November 21, 2003                    By: /s/ JERRY L. MALIS
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Jerry L. Malis, CEO
No. 11-492.

#### Law Offices of Mitchell N. Kay, PC, Petitioner v. Darwin Lesher.

565 U.S. 1185, 132 S. Ct. 1143,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 967.

181 L. Ed. 2d 1030,

January 23, 2012.

Motion of Commercial Law League of America for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of ACA International for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of National Association of Retail Collection Attorneys for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 650 F.3d 993.
No. 09-7479.

#### Melvin Ketchum, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

559 U.S. 1046, 130 S. Ct. 2085,

176 L. Ed. 2d 431,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2853.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1152, 130 S. Ct. 1147, 175 L. Ed. 2d 980, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 674.
No. 09-1044.

#### Ricardo Briones and Riley Briones, Jr., Petitioners v. United States.

559 U.S. 1038, 130 S. Ct. 2079,

176 L. Ed. 2d 416,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2915.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 09-7753.

#### Laurie Marie Laskey, Petitioner v. Corning Cable Systems.

559 U.S. 1033, 130 S. Ct. 1945,

176 L. Ed. 2d 409,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2411.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 910, 130 S. Ct. 1293, 175 L. Ed. 2d 1084, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 830.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7438
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RAYFORD KNIGHT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CR-93- 22-L, CA-97-1302-L) Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 11, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rayford Knight, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Knight , Nos. CR-93-22-L; CA-97-1302-L (D. Md. Sept. 9, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 09-9472.

#### Michael Hardy, Petitioner v. J. Walter Wood, Jr.

560 U.S. 908, 130 S. Ct. 3279,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1189,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3946.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 342 Fed. Appx. 441.
##### 



REVOLVING NOTE
(Regions Bank)
 $3,500,000
    
    St. Louis, Missouri
September 26, 2006




---



##### 



ORAL AGREEMENTS OR COMMITMENTS TO LOAN MONEY, EXTEND CREDIT OR TO FORBEAR FROM ENFORCING
REPAYMENT OF A DEBT INCLUDING PROMISES TO EXTEND OR RENEW SUCH DEBT ARE NOT ENFORCEABLE, REGARDLESS
OF THE LEGAL THEORY UPON WHICH IT IS BASED, THAT IS IN ANY WAY RELATED TO THE CREDIT AGREEMENT. TO
PROTECT YOU (BORROWERS) AND US (LENDER) FROM MISUNDERSTANDING OR DISAPPOINTMENT, ANY AGREEMENTS WE
REACH COVERING SUCH MATTERS ARE CONTAINED IN THE CREDIT AGREEMENT AND THE LOAN DOCUMENTS REFERRED
TO THEREIN, WHICH ARE THE COMPLETE AND EXCLUSIVE STATEMENTS OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN US, EXCEPT AS
WE MAY LATER AGREE IN WRITING TO MODIFY IT.
 BORROWERS:SYNERGETICS, INC.BY:
    
    /s/ Pamela G. BooneNAME: Pamela G. BooneTITLE: Chief Financial OfficerandSYNERGETICS USA, INC.BY:
    
    /s/ Pamela G. BooneNAME: Pamela G. BooneTITLE: Chief Financial Officer
 2
No. 09-763.

#### Darniece Turnipseed, et al., Petitioners v. Dorothy Brown, Clerk, Circuit Court of Illinois, Cook County, et al.

559 U.S. 1068, 130 S. Ct. 2094,

176 L. Ed. 2d 723,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3380.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 391 Ill. App. 3d 88, 330 Ill. Dec. 358, 908 N.E.2d 546.
<page>                  EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Millburn L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey A.
Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		May 17, 2004
No. 09-9610.

#### Corey Roane, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1082, 130 S. Ct. 2125,

176 L. Ed. 2d 747,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3194.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 356 Fed. Appx. 564.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 81005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33178]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

STATE DEPARTMENT

[Public Notice: 7718]

International Security Advisory Board (ISAB) Meeting Notice; 
Closed Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 10(a)(2), the Department of State 
announces a meeting of the International Security Advisory Board (ISAB) 
to take place on February 8, 2012, at Lawrence Livermore National 
Laboratory, Livermore, California.
    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 
U.S.C. App. 10(d), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), it has been determined that 
this Board meeting will be closed to the public in the interest of 
national defense and foreign policy because the Board will be reviewing 
and discussing matters properly classified in accordance with Executive 
Order 13526. The purpose of the ISAB is to provide the Department with 
a continuing source of independent advice on all aspects of arms 
control, disarmament, political-military affairs, international 
security and related aspects of public diplomacy. The agenda for this 
meeting will include classified discussions related to the Board's 
ongoing studies on current U.S. policy and issues regarding arms 
control, international security, nuclear proliferation, and diplomacy.
    For more information, contact Richard W. Hartman II, Executive 
Director of the International Security Advisory Board, Department of 
State, Washington, DC 20520, telephone: (202) 736-4290.

    Dated: December 14, 2011.
Richard W. Hartman II,
Executive Director, International Security Advisory Board, U.S. 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-33178 Filed 12-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
```
Exhibit 10.29

 

The undersigned executive and BioProtection Systems Corporation (the “Company”) hereby acknowledge and agree that the description below is true and correct in all respects.

 

In 2006, Dr. Nicholas Vahanian borrowed $20,000.00 from the Company, at an interest rate of 5.01% per annum. On March 3, 2010 and May 11, 2010, the Company forgave a total of $8,000.00 of the principal amount of the loan plus $3,604.00 of interest accrued on the loan and paid Dr. Vahanian a cash bonus of $15,000.00, a portion of which was used to cover the resulting tax liability.  On October 31, 2010, Dr. Vahanian repaid the remainder of the loan with a $12,303.07 payment, of which $12,000.00 was applied to the principal and $303.07 was applied to the interest.

 

 

	
EXECUTIVE
    	
 
    	
BIOPROTECTION   SYSTEMS CORPORATION
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/   Nicholas Vahanian
    	
 
    	
/s/   Gordon Link
    
	
Nicholas   Vahanian
    	
 
    	
Print   Name:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:
    	
 
    
	
Date:
    	
11/23/10
    	
 
    	
Date: