alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-07 -024 6-CR IN THE CO URT OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL B JU NE 27, 2007

_________

_________

_________

___ LESLI E J OSEP H W ILLIA MS , Appel lan t

v. THE S TATE OF TEXAS, Appel lee

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 23 7 DIS T RI CT COU RT OF L UB BO CKCOU NT Y; TH NO. 91-41 2,2 96; HON. SAM ABEL MEDINA, PRES IDING

_________

_________

_________

____ Ord er o f Di smissal

_________

_________

_________

_____ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Lesl ie Jos eph W il li ams ha s fil ed a pr o s e noti ce of appeal f ro m his 1991 conv icti on. He w as re q uired to f il e his noti ce of appeal w it h the cl er k o f the tr ial co urt no lat er than 30 day s a fter s entenc e w as impos ed i n open cour t. T EX . R. A PP . P. 26. 2(a)(1). W illiams’ noti ce of appeal w as not fil ed unt il Ju ne 22, 2007.2

A ti mely noti ce of appeal i s e ss enti al to i nv oke o u r appel lat e j ur is dicti on. In re A.L. B., 56 S.W .3d 651, 652 (Tex . Ap p.–W aco 2003, no pet .)
. If the no ti ce is unti mely , t hen the c our t of appeal s c an ta ke no acti on ot her than to dis mis s t he proceed ing
. Id. Al ter nati v ely , if

W ill iams ’ ple adi ng i s c onst ru ed as an a ppl ic ati on for a pos tconv icti on w ri t of habeas co rp us under ar t. 11.07 of t he Tex as Cod e of Cr imi nal Procedu re , w e l ik ew is e hav e no jur is dicti on. Run nel s v . St ate, 804 S. W .2d 2 78 ( Tex . Ap p.–Bea umont 199 1, no pet. ). Post-conviction w rits of hab eas co rpus are to be f iled in the t ri a l c ourt in w hic h the co nv icti on was obtai ned, made retur nabl e to the C our t of Cri minal Appeals . T EX . C OD E C R IM . P ROC . A NN . art. 11.07 §3 ( Ver non 200 5)
. W e di smi ss the appeal for want o f jur is dicti on.
Br ian Qui nn Chief Justice
Do not p ubl is h.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MADEL JULIEN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3720 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 9, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Frederick R. Hardt, Judge. Madel Julien, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
# C_2017438EN.01000402.xml

| 19.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 438/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 438/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8729 — EQT Fund Management/G+E Getec Holding)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 438/03)

On 13 December 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8729. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8729. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
No. 09-9364.

#### Cazzie L. Williams, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1054, 130 S. Ct. 2357,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2955.

176 L. Ed. 2d 571,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# 2008 VOC & NOx Target Levels VOC Target Level for 2008 Milestone Cecil County Nonattainment Area Emissions in Tons per Day Form ula A 2002 Base Year Inventory 60.52 B Biogenic Emissions 42.94 C 2002 Rate - of Progress Base Year Inventory A - B 17.58 D FMVCP/RVP Reductions Between 2002 and 2008 0.69 E 2002 Adjusted Base Year Inventory Calculated Relative to 2008 C - D 16.89 F Ratio 0.0700 G Em issions Reductions Required Between 2002 and 2008 E * F 1.18 H Target Level for 2008 [TL (200 8)] H - G 15.71 I Contingency Percentage 3.00% J Contingency Requirements E * J 0.51 K Target Level for 2008 [TL(2008)] + Contingenc y H - K 15.20 Em ission Level Obtained 14.65



## NOx Target Level for 2008 Milestone Cecil County No nattainment Area Emissions in Tons per Day Form ula A 2002 Base Year Inventory 17.40 B Biogenic Emissions 0.00 C 2002 Rate - of Progress Base Year Inventory A - B 17.40 D FMVCP/RVP Reductions Between 2002 and 2008 2.19 E 2002 Adjusted Base Year Inventory Calculated Relative to 2008 C - D 15.21 F Ratio 0.0800 G Em issions Reductions Required Between 2002 and 2008 E * F 1.22 H Target Level for 2008 [TL (2008)] H - G 13.99 I Contingency Percentage 0.00 J Contingency Requirements E * J 0 .00 K Target Level for 2008 [TL(2008)] + Contingenc y H - K 13.99 Em ission Level Obtained 11.05
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Standard Companies Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Frederic M. Poses, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/ Frederic M. PosesFrederic M. Poses
Chief Executive Officer

March 3, 2004

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is
accompanying the Form 10-K solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a
separate disclosure document.
Compensation Arrangements for Executive Officers



 Exhibit 10.17 

Compensation Arrangements for the Executive Officers 
 Set forth below is a summary of the compensation by SEACOR Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) to its executive officers in their positions as of the date of filing of the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Form 10-K”). All of the Company’s executive officers are at-will employees whose compensation and employment status may be changed at any time in the
discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors. 
 Base Salary. Effective January 1, 2011, the executive
officers are scheduled to receive the following annual base salaries in their current positions: 
  

					
	 Name and Current Position
	  	Base Salary	 
	 Charles Fabrikant, Executive Chairman of the Board
	  	$	700,000	  
	 Oivind Lorentzen, President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	700,000	  
	 Dick Fagerstal, Senior Vice President, Corporate Development and Finance
	  	$	335,000	  
	 Paul Robinson, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
	  	$	350,000	  
	 Richard Ryan, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	350,000	  
	 Matthew Cenac, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
	  	$	250,000	  

 Cash Bonus and
Share Incentive Plan. In their current positions, the executive officers are eligible to: 
  

	 	•	 	 Receive an annual cash incentive award subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. 



 

	 	•	 	 Participate in incentive programs, which currently involve awards of restricted stock and stock options pursuant to SEACOR Holdings Inc.’s 2007
Share Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.29 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007). 


 Benefit Plans and Other Arrangements. In their current positions, the executive officers are eligible to participate in the Company’s broad-based benefit programs generally available to its
salaried employees, including health, disability and life insurance programs, and a qualified 401(k) plan.
Exhibit 10.37



 Exhibit 10.37 
 MeadWestvaco Corporation 
 Compensation Program for Non-Employee Directors

 Effective April 28, 2011, the compensation program for non-employee directors of MeadWestvaco Corporation has been modified and the
form and amount of compensation consist of the following components: 
  

	 	(1)	Following the annual meeting of shareholders, all non-employee directors are awarded MeadWestvaco stock units valued at $100,000 which track the performance of
MeadWestvaco common stock. The stock units are distributed to directors on termination of Board membership in shares of MeadWestvaco common stock. 

  

	 	(2)	Following the annual meeting of shareholders, all non-employee directors receive an annual cash retainer of $75,000. In addition, non-employee directors also receive an
annual cash retainer based on their service as follows: 

  

	 	a.	Members of the Audit Committee (other than the Chair) receive an annual cash retainer of $10,000. 


 

	 	b.	The Chair of the Audit Committee receives an annual cash retainer of $20,000. 


 

	 	c.	The Chair of the Compensation and Organization Development Committee receives an annual cash retainer of $15,000. 


 

	 	d.	The Chair of each other standing Committee of the Board of Directors receives an annual cash retainer of $10,000. 


 

	 	e.	The lead director receives an annual cash retainer of $25,000. 

 Annual cash retainers are payable in a lump sum. Non-employee directors may elect to defer all or a portion of their annual cash retainer.
EXHIBIT 32-1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the amended Quarterly Report of Dogs International  (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2003,  as  filed
with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Rosemary Williams, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant  to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in  all
          material   respects,  the  financial  condition  and   results   of
          operations of the Company.




                              Rosemary Williams
                              President and Chief Executive Officer
                              August 26, 2003
No. 09-9491.

#### Larry Jamerson, Petitioner v. Greyhound.

560 U.S. 908, 130 S. Ct. 3280,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1190,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3954.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1
                         PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

                                   FORM 10-KSB

                                EXHIBIT NO. 23.1

                           CONSENT OF BDO SEIDMAN, LLP



                                     EX-52
<PAGE>   2

                                   CONSENT OF
                    INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Patriot Scientific Corporation
San Diego, California


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement of our report dated July 3, 1997, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Patriot Scientific Corporation, appearing in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 1997.

/s/  BDO SEIDMAN, LLP


Denver, Colorado
July 17, 1997



                                     EX-53
ITEM: Fruit Pastry (POP) MONOGRAPH NO.: KC2

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE: 208 to 424 Kilocalories.

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Flat, golden brown/tan pastry with crust vents; moderate to dark red or
golden yellow, semi-moist fruit filling. For the pastry with the golden
yellow filling, the top surface will be sprinkled with powdered cinnamon.

ODOR: Slightly sweet, fruity or sweet apple cinnamon; baked pastry.

FLAVOR: Low to moderately sweet fruit or sweet apple cinnamon; baked pastry.

TEXTURE: Slightly moist, chewy pastry with a semi-moist smooth filling.

DEFECTS LIKELY TO OCCUR:

APPEARANCE: Slight browning of pastry and filling; some seepage of filling through

crust vents.
ODOR: Low fruit or apple cinnamon with increased baked pastry.
FLAVOR: Decreased fruit flavor; increased staleness and/or rancidity of pastry.
TEXTURE Increased chewiness of pastry; increased gumminess of filling.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: This product is vacuum packed. Inspect for
‘inadequate vacuum! by firmly grasping the edges of the package and attempt to pull or stretch the
material away from the product for a short time. A pouch with adequate vacuum will return to its
original shape when pressure is released. Gently attempt to move product within the pouch by
pressing on the product's edge. Ifthe vacuum is inadequate to preserve and protect the product,
the product will move easily within the pouch. If mold is observed, check the package closely for
tears, cuts or holes. If any are noted, score the package defect and note the mold in the narrative.

SPECIAL NOTES: Serviceability is considered significantly affected when more than 25% of the
product is crushed or reduced to powder. If more than one fruit pastry per package, then slight
sticking together of pastries may occur. In some packages this item may have an inner wrap. The
inner wrap may have an opening, this is not considered a defect.

47
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000807

09-JAN-2017

09:22 AM
Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 14, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00139-CV

ILA MAE IRWIN, Appellant

V.

DOW CORNING CORPORATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 157th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1992-25394L

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from an order signed January 29, 2013. On March 5, 2013, 

appellant filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1. The motion is granted.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown, and Busby.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 38 (Friday, February 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 8900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4117]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Shasta County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Shasta County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet 
at the USDA Service Center in Redding, California, on March 12, 2009 
from 8:30 a.m. to 12 noon; April 9, 2009 from 8:30 a.m. to 12 noon; May 
27 and 28, 2009 from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The purpose of these 
meetings is to discuss proposed projects under Title II of the Secure 
Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2008.

DATES: Thursday, March 12, 2009; Thursday, April 9, 2009; Wednesday and 
Thursday, May 27 and 28, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the USDA Service Center, 3644 
Avtech Parkway, Redding, California 96002.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Resource Advisory Committee 
Coordinator John Heibel at (530) 226-2524 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#543e3c313d3631381432277a3231307a2127"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d8b2b0bdb1babdb498beabf6bebdbcf6adab">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Public 
input sessions will be provided and individuals will have the 
opportunity to address the Shasta County Resource Advisory Committee.

    Dated: February 17, 2009.
J. Sharon Heywood,
Forest Supervisor, Shasta-Trinity National Forest.
[FR Doc. E9-4117 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 09-9204.

#### Paul Makos, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1024, 130 S. Ct. 1929,

176 L. Ed. 2d 397,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2541.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 355 Fed. Appx. 256.
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No s . 06

- 13

- 00104

- CR & 06

- 13

- 00105

- CR

DONALD ROBERT HANEY, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 102nd District Court Red River County, Texas Trial Court No s . CR01693 & CR01730

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.2 

### O RDER
The clerk’s record in this matter was filed June 26, 201 3, and the reporter’s record was filed July 2, 2013, making the appellant’s brief due August 1, 2013. The briefing deadline was extended twice on appellant’s motion, and the brief is currently due September 24, 2013. On September 24, 2013, appellant’s co unsel filed a third motion to extend the deadline for filing appellant’s brief. We have reviewed counsel’s third motion to extend and the record on appeal, and we have been provided with no compelling information to convince us that counsel needs addition al time to prepare this brief. Consequently, the motion to extend time to file appellant’s brief is
overruled. By this order , we set the final deadline for filing appellant’s brief as October 24, 2013. Should appellant fail to file a brief within the time allotted, this appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to Rule 42.3 of the Texas Rule s of Appellate Procedure. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT
Date: October 2, 2013
# C_2017230EN.01002302.xml

| 15.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/23

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8535 — Itochu/Toppan printing/Thung Hua Sinn/TPN Food Packaging)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 230/03)

On 7 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8535. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8535. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 11, 2009 

Order 

 

September 11, 2009 

Rehearing No. 559 

1 May 2009 

136436 

SEYBURN, KAHN, GINN, BESS, 

DEITCH AND SERLIN, P.C., 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 SC: 136436 

v COA: 272903 

Oakland CC: 1999-018126-CK 

KIRIT BAKSHI, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

 In this cause a motion for rehearing is considered and it is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Trane Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frederic M. Poses, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/    FREDERIC M. POSES
|Frederic M. Poses       
|Chief Executive Officer 
|                        
|February 14, 2008
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DAVID E. JONES,

 

 Appellant,

v.

ERIC M. WILLIE AND WILLIAM D. 

POWERS,

 Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00111-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 1

of Travis County, Texas 

(TC# C-1-CV-17-003737)

O R D E R

By opinion and judgment issued this same date in cause number 08-19-00196-CV, the 

Court granted Appellant’s motion to consolidate cause number 08-19-00196-CV with cause 

number 08-19-00111-CV and dismissed cause number 08-19-00196-CV. The notice of appeal 

filed in cause number 08-19-00196-CV has been filed as an amended notice of appeal in this cause 

number. Further, Appellant’s motion filed on July 31, 2019 in cause number 08-19-00196-CV has 

been filed in this cause number. The clerk’s record filed in the instant appeal does not include the 

notice of appeal filed by Appellant with the trial court clerk on May 30, 2019. Therefore, a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing that notice of appeal is due to be filed in this Court on or 

before August 12, 2019. In the event it is necessary to supplement the clerk’s record with any 

other items, Appellant is directed to immediately take steps to ensure they are included in the 

supplemental clerk’s record. Appellant’s brief is due to be filed on August 9, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1

st day of August, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.