alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Montana First Judicial District Court. County of Lewis and Clark.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- BRYCE PATRICK COX, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-15-435

DECISION

On August 18,2016, the Court revoked the Defendant’s suspended sentence for violations of the conditions of his probation and sentenced the Defendant to a commitment to the Montana Department of Corrections for a term of five (5) years, with two (2) years suspended, for the offense of Count I: Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs (methamphetamine), a Felony, in violation of §45-9-102(1), MCA. The Court granted credit for time served prior to sentencing from July 19, 2016 - August 18, 2016 (31 days). The Department was authorized to place the Defendant into an appropriate community-based program, facility, or a State corrections institution, with the Court recommendation that the Defendant be placed at MASC, followed by appropriate treatment, including chemical dependency treatment. The Court recommended all previously imposed conditions of Defendant’s sentence remain in full force and effect should Defendant be granted an early release.

On November 17, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Brent Getty of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of *100Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

Done in open Court this 17th day of November, 2016.

DATED this 8th day of December, 2016.

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member.
Exhibit 24
POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned does hereby appoint G. Peter D’Aloia, Mary Elizabeth Gustafsson and Mark C.Cresitello as their true and lawful attorneys to sign American Standard Companies Inc. (the“Corporation”) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, and any amendmentsthereto, on behalf of the undersigned as a director of the Corporation, and to file the same, withany exhibits thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission; each of said attorneys shallhave the power to act hereunder with or without the others.        Signature   Date /s/ Steven E. AndersonSteven E. Anderson February 3, 2005   /s/ Jared L. CohonJared L. Cohon February 3, 2005   /s/ Paul J. CurlanderPaul J. Curlander February 3, 2005   /s/ Steven F. GoldstoneSteven F. Goldstone February 3, 2005   /s/ Edward E. HagenlockerEdward E. Hagenlocker February 3, 2005   /s/ James F. HardymonJames F. Hardymon February 3, 2005   /s/ Ruth Ann MarshallRuth Ann Marshall February 3, 2005
Exhibit 35.1

 

ANNUAL SERVICER’S COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

 

This Compliance Certificateis furnished pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of August 16,2017, by and among Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2017-B, Hyundai Capital America, as seller and servicer (the “Servicer”),Hyundai ABS Funding, LLC, as depositor, and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee and Item 1123 of Regulation AB. The undersignedhereby certifies that:

 

1)          Iam a duly authorized officer of the Servicer.

 

2)          Areview of the activities of the Servicer from August 16, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Relevant Period”) andof the Servicer’s performance under the Agreement during the Relevant Period has been made under my supervision.

 

3)          Basedon such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Relevant Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have duly executed thisCompliance Certificate this 15th day of March, 2018.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 27, 2018

a0920

Order 

Clerk

September 27, 2018

156088(23)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 156088

COA: 336811

Wayne CC: 14-004004-FC

RONALD LEE FOSTER,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 21, 

2018 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
China Green Energy Industries, Inc.: Exhibit 10.37 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.37

Loan (Credit) Contract of Maximum Amount of RMB 7,000,000, with
a term from May 3, 2010 to May 26, 2013, between Changzhou City Wujin Best
Appliances Co., Ltd. and Jiangsu Wujin Rural Commercial Bank, by mortgaging the
land.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

THEODORE D. PRZYBYSZEWSKI, JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 9 EM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of February

, 2017, the Petition for Leave to File Petition

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED

.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Donald J. Carter, Jr., as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Home Interiors & Gifts, Inc., (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:

         (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending June 30,
2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 12, 2003

                                            /s/ DONALD J. CARTER, JR.
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Donald J. Carter, Jr.
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
No. 09-8961.

#### Thomas James Roberts, Petitioner v. Billy Mitchem, Warden, et al.

559 U.S. 1052, 130 S. Ct. 2349,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2968.

176 L. Ed. 2d 567,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

   Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of West Bancorporation, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas E. Stanberry,
Chief Executive Officer of West Bancorporation, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
conditions and results of operations of West Bancorporation, Inc.

November 3, 2005


/s/ Thomas E. Stanberry
-----------------------------------------------
Thomas E. Stanberry
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-6619.

#### Steven Louis Canha, Petitioner v. Washington.

565 U.S. 1067, 132 S. Ct. 776,

181 L. Ed. 2d 498,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8472.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3 denied.

Same case below, 159 Wash. App. 1044.
No. 09-8849.

#### Frederick Lee Revels, Petitioner v. James Reynolds, et al.

559 U.S. 1089, 130 S. Ct. 2147,

176 L. Ed. 2d 764,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3208.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 987, 130 S. Ct. 1728, 176 L. Ed. 2d 206, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 1965.
Exhibit 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Victor Hamilton, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of TCI Solutions, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the period presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 17, 2005

 

/s/ Victor Hamilton

Victor Hamilton

Acting Chief Executive Office
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 355 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to extend the basis for the denial 

of retirement credit, for service as a Member of Congress, to include 

conviction of any felony under Federal or State law, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2019 

Mr. YOHO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight 

and Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to extend the basis 

for the denial of retirement credit, for service as a Member of Congress, to include conviction of any felony under 

Federal or State law, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Trust Returned to the 

5 United States Taxpayer Act’’ or the ‘‘TRUST Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 355 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

2 (a) RELATING TO CSRS.—Section 8332(o)(2) of title 

3 5, United States Code, is amended— 

4 (1) in subparagraph (A)— 

5 (A) by repealing clause (ii); and 

6 (B) in clause (iii)— 

7 (i) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of sub8 clause (I)(bb); 

9 (ii) by striking the period at the end 

10 of subclause (II)(bb) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; 

11 and 

12 (iii) by adding after subclause (II) the 

13 following: 

14 ‘‘(III) is committed after the date 

15 of enactment of the Trust Returned 

16 to the United States Taxpayer Act 

17 and is described under subparagraph 

18 (B)(xxxii).’’; and 

19 (2) in subparagraph (B), by adding at the end 

20 the following: 

21 ‘‘(xxxii)(I) An offense, not otherwise 

22 described under this subparagraph, which 

23 is a felony under the laws of a State or the 

24 United States. 

25 ‘‘(II) For purposes of this clause, the 

26 term ‘State’ includes the District of CoVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:18 Jan 19, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H355.IH H355

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 355 IH

1 lumbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, 

2 American Samoa, Guam, the Common3 wealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, 

4 and the Virgin Islands.’’. 

5 (b) RELATING TO FERS.—Section 8411(l)(2) of title 

6 5, United States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) by repealing subparagraph (B); and 

8 (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘sub9 section.’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection, or, in the case 

10 of an offense described in section 

11 8332(o)(2)(B)(xxxii), after the date of enactment of 

12 the Trust Returned to the United States Taxpayer 

13 Act.’’. 

14 (c) APPLICATION.—For purposes of applying section 

15 8332(o) of title 5, United States Code, the amendments 

16 made by this section shall apply to any act or omission 

17 occurring after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
No. 09-9928.

#### Antonio Maurice Craig, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1113, 130 S. Ct. 2421,

176 L. Ed. 2d 936,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3779.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 358 Fed. Appx. 446.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4895 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4895

 To amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to limit the provision of 
United States military assistance and the sale, transfer, or licensing 
     of United States military equipment or technology to Ethiopia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2006

 Mr. Rohrabacher introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to limit the provision of 
United States military assistance and the sale, transfer, or licensing 
     of United States military equipment or technology to Ethiopia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON UNITED STATES MILITARY ASSISTANCE TO ETHIOPIA.

    (a) Amendments.--Chapter 1 of part III of the Foreign Assistance 
Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2351 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating the second section 620G (as added by 
        section 149 of Public Law 104-164 (110 Stat. 1436)) as section 
        620J; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 620K. LIMITATION ON MILITARY ASSISTANCE TO ETHIOPIA.

    ``(a) Limitation.--Military assistance may be provided to the 
Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia and military equipment and 
technology may be sold, transferred, or licensed for sale to Ethiopia 
pursuant to the authorities contained in this Act or any other Act only 
if the President first transmits to Congress a certification described 
in subsection (b).
    ``(b) Certification.--A certification described in this subsection 
is a certification that contains a determination of the President that 
the Government of Ethiopia will not use the military assistance to be 
provided or the military equipment or technology to be sold, 
transferred, or licensed for sale against pro-democracy advocates or 
peaceful civilian protesters in Ethiopia.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The limitation on the provision of United 
States military assistance and the sale, transfer, or licensing of 
United States military equipment or technology to Ethiopia under 
section 620K of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (as added by 
subsection (a) of this section) applies with respect to the provision 
of such assistance and the sale, transfer, or licensing of such 
equipment or technology for fiscal year 2007 and subsequent fiscal 
years.
                                 <all>
```
No. 09-1093.

#### John A. Hickey, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1070, 130 S. Ct. 2115,

176 L. Ed. 2d 726,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3396.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 580 F.3d 922.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Lisa Zumpano, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Countryside Review Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 13th day of November, 2003.



| | /s/ Lisa Zumpano
Lisa Zumpano
Principal Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------



---
# C_2017284EN.01000201.xml

| 29.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8579 — HgCapital/Visma)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 284/03)

On 21 August 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8579. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8579. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---