alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### NUMBER 13

- 16

- 00 465

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

IN R E SHAHIN ZARAIEHN

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria Per Curiam Order

Relator

, Shahin Zaraiehn

, f iled a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause

on August 22, 2016

. Through this original pro ceeding, relator seeks to set aside an order

granting a new trial

. T he Court requests that the real part y in interest , Dale & Klein, L.L.P.

, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response
to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date

of this order. See T EX

. R

. A PP

. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM2

D elivered and filed the 2 2nd day of August , 201 6

.
Exhibit 32.1  Esio Water & Beverage Development Corp.  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Esio Water & Beverage Development Corp. (the “Company”) for the year ended June 30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Andrew Eccelstone, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  By:/s/ Andrew EcclestoneAndrew Ecclestone
President and Chief Executive Officer  Dated:March 18, 2015
No. 09-800.

#### North County Community Alliance, Inc., Petitioner v. Ken L. Salazar, Secretary of the Interior, et al.

559 U.S. 1068, 130 S. Ct. 2095,

176 L. Ed. 2d 723,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3293.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 573 F.3d 738.
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements Form S-8 pertaining to the 2002 Omnibus Incentive Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Registration No. 333-96547), Form S-3 pertaining to the registration of $1.0 billion of debt securities (Registration No. 333-67943), Form S-8
pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Registration No. 333-40575), Form S-8 pertaining to the Deferred Compensation Plan (Registration No. 333-75492), Form S-8 pertaining to the Supplemental Compensation Plan for Outside Directors
(Registration No. 333-109562) and Forms S-8 pertaining to the Stock Incentive Plan (Registration Nos. 333-65252 and 033-63007) of American Standard Companies Inc., of our reports dated February 21, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedules of American Standard Companies Inc., American Standard Companies Inc. managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of American Standard Companies Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


New York, New York

February 21, 2006
# C_2017388EN.01000101.xml

| 17.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 388/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 388/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8636 — Abellio/Mitsui/EJR/West Midlands Passenger Rail Franchise)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 388/01)

On 9 November 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8636. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8636. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
No. 09-9948.

#### Walter Henry, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1114, 130 S. Ct. 2423,

176 L. Ed. 2d 937,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3867.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 356 Fed. Appx. 423.
## MEMORANDUM

**DATE:** 11/2 4/14 **FROM:** Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR
– 2013
- 0602 **SUBJECT:** Discussion of the Clean Power Plan at a Symposium O rganized by the Duke Nicholas

Institute and the Georgia Institute of Technology
**SUMMARY :**  

### EPA Region 4 and OAP participate d in a symposium entitled “Shaping the Southeast’s Energy Future
– Regional Electricity Trends and the EPA’s Clean Power Plan” organized by the Duke Nicholas Institute and the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, GA, on September 26 , 2014 

### . The Clea n Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was p roposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES :**  **EPA** Ken Mitchell/EPA R4 Beverly Banister/EPA R4 Julia Miller/EPA OAP **External Stakeholders**  Marilyn Brown/Georgia Tech Tim Profeta/Duke Nicholas Institute Gary Brinkworth/TVA Jeremy Tarr/Duke Nicholas Institute Dan Matisoff/Georgia Tech Myra Reece/SC Department of Health and Environmental Control Paula Cobb/Florida Department of Envi ronmental Protection Luis Martinez/National Resources Defense Council Diane Denton/Duke Energy James McLawhorn/NC Utilities Commission Public Staff Chuck Eaton/GA PSC Mandy Mahoney/Southeast Energy Efficiency Alliance John Morrison/Strata Solar Jonas Monas t/Duke Nicholas Institute Brian Toth/Southern Company Franz Litz/Great Plains Institute Frank Rambo/Southern Environmental Law Center Approximately 50 additional attendees
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on
Form 10-Q of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp. (the
Company) for the period ended March 31, 2004
(the Report) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Nikolas Antonopoulos,
Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |    |                                                                                                                                                              
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | this Report fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|
| | 2. | the information contained in this Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  May 7, 2004

| |     |                         
| | --- | ------------------------
| | By: | /s/ Nikolas Antonopoulos

| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| |                                      
| | Nikolas Antonopoulos                 
| | Chief Executive Officer and President

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
No. 09-8305.

#### Anthony Wooten, Petitioner v. Michigan.

559 U.S. 1117, 130 S. Ct. 2430,

176 L. Ed. 2d 943,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3812.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 980, 130 S. Ct. 1705, 176 L. Ed. 2d 194, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 2167.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned, Kenneth Hicks, of Argentex Mining Corporation,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Argentex Mining
Corporation for the interim period ended October 31, 2005 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Argentex Mining Corporation

Dated: April 8, 2008

|/s/
      Kenneth Hicks       | 
|----------------------------- | 
|Kenneth Hicks                 | 
|President and Director        | 
|(Principal Executive Officer) | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Argentex Mining
Corporation and will be retained by Argentex Mining Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
exv10w3






Exhibit 10.3



FORM OF AMENDMENT TO

INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT



          This AMENDMENT to the Indemnification Agreement (the “Agreement”) entered into as of February
25, 2011, by and between [__________] (the “Executive”) and THE ST. JOE COMPANY, a Florida
corporation (the “Company”), shall be effective February 25, 2011.


          WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive previously entered into the Agreement in order for the
Company to provide for the indemnification and the advancing of expenses to the Executive as set
forth in the Agreement;


          WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have the power to further amend the Agreement and now
wish to do so;


          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein contained, and
for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby
acknowledged, the Executive and the Company, intending to be legally bound, hereby amend the
Agreement as follows:




	 	1.	 	Section 8 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:






“8. Liability Insurance.




     The Company shall, while the Indemnified Party is employed or
otherwise provides services to the Company as an officer or director
of the Company and for a period of at least six (6) years
thereafter, maintain an insurance policy or policies providing
directors’ and officers’ liability insurance meeting the
requirements established by the Board from time to time. Indemnified
Party shall be covered by such policy or policies, in accordance
with its or their terms, to the maximum extent of the coverage
available for any director or officer of the Company, whether or not
the Company would have the power to indemnify Indemnified Party
against such liability under the provisions of this Agreement or
applicable law. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, any such coverage provided hereunder to the Indemnified
Party following the date on which the Indemnified Party ceases to be
an officer or director of the Company shall be no less favorable to
the Indemnified Party in any respect than (x) the coverage then
provided to other officers and directors of the Company (as such
coverage may be amended from time to time for such officers and
directors) and (y) the coverage as in effect on March 1, 2011.”




	 	2.	 	The Agreement, as amended hereby, shall remain in full force and effect.





[Signature page follows]




 









 







          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Indemnified Party and the Company have executed and delivered this
Amendment on the date(s) set forth below, but effective as of the date set forth above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	 	 	THE ST. JOE COMPANY	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date: February 26, 2011

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

           Rusty Bozman
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	           Senior Vice President, Corporate
 Development
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	INDEMNIFIED PARTY	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date: February     , 2011
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	[Name]	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	[Title]
Order 2011

- 11

- 3

Served: November 2 , 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 2 nd day of November

, 2011

Application of

FRIENDSHIP AIRWAYS

, INC.

d/b/a YELLOW AIR TAXI

for aut hority to resume scheduled passenger

operations as a commuter air carrier under

49 U.S.C. § 41738 Docket DOT

- OST

- 20 05

- 21533

FINAL ORDER

By Order 2011

- 10

- 9 , issued on October 18 , 2011

, we directed all interested persons to show

cause why we s hould not make final our tentative findings and conclusions that the Department

should revoke the Commuter Air Carrier Authorization issued to Friendship Airwa ys, Inc. d/b/a

Yellow Air Taxi and deny its application to resume commuter operations

, pursuant t o

49 U.S.C. § 40109(f) and 14 CFR Part 298.

Interested persons were given 14 days to file objections to the order.

No objections to the show cause order were received.

ACCORDINGLY,

1

. We revoke the Commu ter Air Carrier Authorization issued to Fri endship Airways, Inc.

d/b/a Yellow Air Taxi ;

2

. We deny the application to resume commuter operations submitted in Docket DOT

- OST

2005

- 21533 by Friendship Airwa ys, Inc. d/b/a Yellow Air Taxi.2

3

. We will serve a copy of this order on the persons liste d in Attachment A.

By:

SUSAN L. KURLAND

Assistant Secretary for Aviation

and International Affairs

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at

http://www.regulations.govAttachment A

SERVICE LIST FOR

FRIENDSHIP A IRWAYS, INC

. d/b/a YELLOW AIR TAXI

MR CHRISTOPHER BEHNAM

FRIENDSHIP AIRWAYS INC

2680 NE 24 STREET

POMPANO BEACH FL 33064 MR WILLIAM J WEBER

CERTIFICATION SECTION

MANAGER

FAA AFS

- 900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166 REGIONAL COUNSEL

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

SOUTHERN REGION

POST OFFICE BOX 20636

ATLANTA GA 30320

MR JERRY PROENZA

POI FOR FRIENDSHIP AIRWAYS INC

2895 SW 145 TH AVENUE

SUITE 120

MIRAMAR FL 33027 M S ANNE SUISSA RTS

- 42

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E

- 36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

MR PETER LYNCH AGC

- 300

FAA ASST CHIEF COUNSEL

FOR ENFORCEMENT

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591 MR BERNARD STANKUS, RTS

- 42

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E

- 36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date: October 15, 2007
    
    /s/ Gregg D. SchellerGregg D. SchellerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-3067

LARRY M. DOW,

Petitioner,

v.

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in

SF3443020159-X-1.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Larry M. Dow moves without opposition for reconsideration of the court's January

15, 2009 order dismissing his petition for review for failure to submit a Fed. Cir. R. 15(c)

statement concerning discrimination.

Dow has now submitted the Rule 15(c) form.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted, the mandate is recalled, and the petition for review is

reinstated. Dow's brief is due within 30 days of the date of filing of this order.

FOR THE COURT

FEB 2 6 2009	is/ Jan Horbaly 

Date

cc:	Michael J. Kator, Esq.

Meredyth Cohen Havasy, Esq.

Jan Horbaly

Clerk FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

s17	

FEB 2 6 2009

JAN NNW

CLERK
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Amincor, Inc. (the "Company")
on  Form  10-Q/A  for the  period  ended  June  30,  2011  (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the capacity and on the date indicated below,  hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.


Date: October 24, 2011                  /s/ Robert L. Olson
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert L. Olson, Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 3, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 9171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4527]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families

45 CFR Parts 302, 303 and 307

RIN 0970-AC01


State Parent Locator Service; Safeguarding Child Support 
Information: Proposed Delay of Effective Date

AGENCY: Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE), Administration for 
Children and Families (ACF), Department of Heath and Human Services

ACTION: Proposed delay of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the memorandum of January 20, 2009, from 
the Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff, entitled 
``Regulatory Review,'' published in the Federal Register on January 26, 
2009, the Department is seeking public comment on a contemplated delay 
of 60 days in the effective date of the rule entitled ``State Parent 
Locator Service; Safeguarding Child Support Information,'' published in 
the Federal Register on September 26, 2008 [73 FR 56422]. That rule 
addresses requirements for State Parent Locator Service responses to 
authorized location requests, State IV-D program safeguarding of 
confidential information, authorized disclosures of this information, 
and restrictions on the use of confidential data and information for 
child support purposes with exceptions for certain disclosures 
permitted by statute. The Department is considering a temporary 60-day 
delay in effective date to allow Department officials the opportunity 
for further review and consideration of new regulations, consistent 
with the Chief of Staff's memorandum of January 20, 2009.
    The Department solicits comments specifically on the contemplated 
delay in effective date.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 12, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    <bullet> Mail: Interested persons are invited to submit written 
comments via regular postal mail to: Office of Child Support 
Enforcement, Administration for Children and Families, 370 L'Enfant 
Promenade, SW., 4th floor, Washington, DC 20447, Attention: Division of 
Policy; Mail Stop: ACF/OCSE/DP.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yvette Riddick, Office of Child 
Support Enforcement, Division of Policy, (202) 401-4885.

    Dated: February 26, 2009.
Charles E. Johnson,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-4527 Filed 2-27-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
In the MATTER OF the Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust Executed by David L. FRUCELLA and Marilyn L. Frucella Dated June 28, 1985 and Recorded in Book 5044 at Page 764 in the Mecklenburg County Public Registry, North Carolina

No. 344P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

James Patrick Galvin, Attorney at Law, For Frucella, David L., et al

Donald Richard Pocock, Attorney at Law, For Citi Mortgage

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th of October 2018 by Respondents in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eon Labs, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,William F. Holt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|             | /s/  William F. Holt     |   |
|------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|             | William  F. Holt         |
|             | Chief  Financial Officer |
|             |                     |
|             |                     |
| August 12,  2003 |                     |

 

1

----
#### Morsette v. State

2016 MT 294N

DA 15-0443

11/15/16

Affirmed

Dist. 17 (Blaine)
No. 09-7802.

#### Geir Hansen, Petitioner v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of Colorado, et al.

559 U.S. 1088, 130 S. Ct. 2144,

176 L. Ed. 2d 761,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3131.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 943, 130 S. Ct. 1509, 176 L. Ed. 2d 120, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 1103.
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
    2002
  Form 10-Q
  1.
    This Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and2.
    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.  Dated: April 30, 2009

By: /s/ Douglas M.  LibbyDouglas
    M. Libby
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    46