alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.12(b)

    


    Schedule
identifying

    Non-Employee
Directors of Park National Corporation

    covered
by

    Split-Dollar Agreements,
made and entered into effective as of December 28, 2007

    


    The following directors of Park
National Corporation (“Park”) are covered by Split-Dollar Agreements (the “New
Split-Dollar Agreements”) as identified below, which Split-Dollar Agreements are
identical to the form of Split-Dollar Agreement, made and entered into effective
as of December 28, 2007, filed as Exhibit 10.2(a) to Park’s Current Report
on Form 8-K dated January 2, 2008 (File No. 1-13006):

    


    
      
        
          
            
              
                
                  	
                           

                          Name of Director

                        	 
      	
                          Subsidiary of Park which is a Party to

                          New Split-Dollar Agreement

                        	 
      	
                          Date of New Split-

                          Dollar Agreement

                        
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                          Maureen
      H. Buchwald

                        	 
      	
                          The
      Park National Bank (as successor by merger to The First-Knox National Bank
      of Mount Vernon)

                        	 
      	
                          December
      28, 2007

                        
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                          James
      J. Cullers

                        	 
      	
                          The
      Park National Bank (as successor by merger to The First-Knox National Bank
      of Mount Vernon)

                        	 
      	
                          December
      28, 2007

                        
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                          F.
      William Englefield IV

                        	 
      	
                          The
      Park National Bank

                        	 
      	
                          December
      28, 2007

                        
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                          John
      J. O’Neill

                        	 
      	
                          The
      Park National Bank

                        	 
      	
                          December
      28, 2007

                        
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                          Rick
      R. Taylor

                        	 
      	
                          The
      Park National Bank (as successor by merger to The Richland Trust
      Company)

                        	 
      	
                          December
      28, 2007

                        
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                          Leon
      Zazworsky

                        	
                            

                        	
                          The
      Park National Bank

                        	
                            

                        	
                          December
      28,
2007
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4863]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 3, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Burl Thornton, Assistant Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Grand River Commerce, Inc., Grandville, Michigan, to become a 
bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Grand River Bank (in organization), Grandville, Michigan.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Todd Offenbacker, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. CB Bancshares, Inc., Topeka, Kansas, to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Citizens Bank 
of Weir, Weir, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 4, 2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-4863 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
No. 09-925.

#### Martha Dean, Petitioner v. Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General of Connecticut.

559 U.S. 1058, 130 S. Ct. 2347,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3095.

176 L. Ed. 2d 577,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice So-tomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 577 F.3d 60.
No. 09-9119.

#### John Witherow, Petitioner v. Jackie Crawford, et al.

559 U.S. 1075, 130 S. Ct. 2107,

176 L. Ed. 2d 736,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3310.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 339 Fed. Appx. 785.
Form of Award notice under the Restricted Stock Unit Plan dated January 20, 2011



 Exhibit 10.33 

 

 

 February 10, 2011 
 Chrysler Group LLC Restricted Stock Unit Plan 
 Award Notice 

[Name] 
 Dear [Name]: 

Chrysler Group LLC (the “Company”) is pleased to evidence and confirm its grant to you of
             Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) on January 20, 2011 (the “Grant Date”), pursuant to the Chrysler Group LLC Restricted Stock Unit Plan
(the “RSU Plan”). The terms defined in the RSU Plan have the same meanings in this Award Notice. This Award Notice and the RSUs evidenced by this Award Notice are subject to and subordinate to the terms and conditions set forth in the RSU
Plan which is enclosed. 
 This Award Notice is intended to comply and will be administered in a manner that complies with the
limitations and restrictions imposed by Section 111 of TARP. The Special Master has approved the grant of the RSUs to you. However, compensation that is not permitted to be paid or accrued under TARP shall not be paid or accrued under this
Award Notice, and you shall have no right or claim against the Company for any benefits or compensation that the Company, in its discretion, determines is not payable or cannot be accrued under this Award Notice as a result of compliance with TARP.

 The RSUs evidenced by this Award Notice will vest if you are continuously employed through January 20, 2014 (the
“Vesting Date”). However, in the event you die or become permanently disabled prior to the Vesting Date, all otherwise unvested RSUs are immediately vested. Further, consistent with an amendment to the RSU Plan approved by the Compensation
and Leadership Development Committee on May 6, 2010, and applicable to all grants before that date and this current grant, in the event you retire on or after the second anniversary of the Grant Date, you will continue to be considered an
employee for purposes of vesting of RSUs. In all other instances, if your employment terminates prior to the Vesting Date set forth above, the Unvested RSUs then held by you shall be forfeited without payment as of the date your employment
terminates. 







 Except as provided in Section 6(b) (overriding TARP rule) of the RSU Plan,
(i) an amount equal to the Fair Market Value of the Chrysler Units underlying the RSUs credited to your RSU Account will be paid to you on or as soon as practicable after the applicable Vesting Date, but in no event later than
March 15 of the calendar year next following the calendar year in which the Vesting Date occurs. 
  

			
	CHRYSLER GROUP LLC
		
	By:	 	
	
	  

	 Nancy A.
Rae                                 Date

Senior Vice President


	Human Resources


  

			
	PARTICIPANT	 	
	
	  

	[Name]	 	Date



  
 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6945

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DANIEL REKUS GIBERT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. 

(8:09-cr-00438-TMC-1; 8:14-cv-02641-TMC)

Submitted: November 17, 2015 Decided: November 19, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Rekus Gibert, Appellant Pro Se. Maxwell B. Cauthen, III, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Rekus Gibert seeks to appeal the district court’s 

orders dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion

and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. The orders are

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Gibert has not made the requisite showing. See Day v. 

McDonough, 547 U.S. 198, 209-10 (2006) (permitting sua sponte 

consideration of timeliness of postconviction motion provided 

“court . . . accord[s] the parties fair notice and an 
3

opportunity to present their positions”); see Hill v. Braxton, 

277 F.3d 701, 706 (4th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

| March 19, 2010

  | By: /s/ | Catherine H. Smith                      |   |
|----------------------------------|--------------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| (Date)

                    |         | Catherine H. Smith

President |   |

 

 

 

 

 

----
No. 09-9062.

#### Darryl Jennings, Petitioner v. New Jersey.

559 U.S. 1074, 130 S. Ct. 2104,

176 L. Ed. 2d 734,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3470.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, denied.
No. 11-6521.

#### Assem A. Abulkhair, Petitioner v. Menelaos Toskos, et al.

565 U.S. 1176, 132 S. Ct. 1161,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1015,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1035.

January 23, 2012.

Motion of petitioner *1016for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1














Certification of Chief Executive Officer of ULURU Inc.


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant


to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of ULURU Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of ULURU Inc. does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1.)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2.)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








Date: August 16, 2010

/s/ Kerry P. GrayKerry P. GrayPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
No. 09-8372.

#### Marjorie Ventruella and Victoria Biks, Petitioners v. United States.

559 U.S. 955, 130 S. Ct. 1547,

176 L. Ed. 2d 139,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1459.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 585 F.3d 1013.
# Fou rth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 29, 2021

No. 04

- 19

- 00704

- CR

Ex parte James Burke JARREAU

From the 216th Judicial District Court

, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5552

Honorable N. Keith Williams , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez , Chief Justice 1

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

B eth Watkins, Jus tice

Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice 

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice 



### ORDER

The C o urt has considered appellant ’ s motion for en banc reconsideration and appellee ’ s

response 2 to the motion. Appellant ’ s motion for en banc reconsideration is DENIED.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

1 Dissenting to denial without opinion.

2 A s mentioned in appe llee ’ s response, a prior opinion from this Court, Sanchez

- Vas quez v. State

, 6 10 S.W.3d 36

(Tex. A pp.

— San Anton io 2 020, no pet.)

, did not address Johnson v. United States , 576 U.S. 591 (2015 ) , an d its

effect on facial vagueness c hallenge s to criminal statute s

. We welcome further guidance on this issue from the Texas

Court of Crimi na l Ap pea ls

.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of April, 2021

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz

, Clerk of Court
109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5108

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1213 East Houston Street in Cleveland, 

Texas, as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Robert A. Martinez Post 

Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5108 EH

1 SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL ROBERT A. MARTINEZ POST 

2 OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1213 East Houston Street in 

5 Cleveland, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Lance Corporal Robert A. Martinez Post Office Build7 ing’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lance Corporal Rob12 ert A. Martinez Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 

2006. 

Attest:

Clerk. 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5108

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostRobert A. Martinez Post Office Building’’. in Cleveland, Texas, as the ‘‘Lance Corporal al Service located at 1213 East Houston Street
No. 09-9086.

#### April Rose Wilkens, Petitioner v. Oklahoma.

559 U.S. 1075, 130 S. Ct. 2106,

176 L. Ed. 2d 735,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3364.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma denied.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 42 (Thursday, March 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9638-9639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4624]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of a Change in Status of an Extended Benefit (EB) Period 
for Pennsylvania

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a change in benefit period eligibility 
under the EB program for Pennsylvania.
    The following change has occurred since the publication of the last 
notice regarding the State's EB status:
    <bullet> Pennsylvania's 13-week insured unemployment rate (IUR) for 
the week ending January 31, 2009, rose to 5.04 percent and exceeds 120 
percent of the corresponding average rate in the two prior years. 
Therefore, beginning the week of February 15, 2009, eligible unemployed 
workers will be able to collect up to an additional 13 weeks of UI 
benefits.

Information for Claimants

    The duration of benefits payable in the EB program, and the terms 
and conditions on which they are payable, are governed by the Federal-
State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970, as amended, and 
the operating instructions issued to the states by the U.S. Department 
of Labor. In the case of a state beginning an EB period, the State 
Workforce Agency will furnish a written notice of potential entitlement 
to each individual who has exhausted all rights to regular benefits and 
is potentially eligible for EB (20 CFR 615.13(c)(1)).
    Persons who believe they may be entitled to EB or who wish to 
inquire about their rights under the program should contact their State 
Workforce Agency.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Gibbons, U.S. Department of 
Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Office of Workforce 
Security, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Frances Perkins Bldg., Room S-
4231, Washington, DC 20210, telephone number (202) 693-3008 (this is 
not a toll-free number) or by e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#12757b70707d7c613c61717d666652767d7e3c757d64"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c6b656e6e63627f227f6f6378784c686360226b637a">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 9639]]


    Signed in Washington, DC, this 26th day of February 2009.
Douglas F. Small,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.
 [FR Doc. E9-4624 Filed 3-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FW-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
**PURSUANT TO**
**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alion Science and Technology Corporation (the“Corporation”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bahman Atefi, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.
Date: May 13, 2005    By: /s/ Bahman Atefi   Name: Bahman Atefi Title: Chief Executive Officer