alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Regis Bosse, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Terra Nostra Resources, Ltd.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. As the Registrant's sole certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant I have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors:

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: August 19, 2003		By: /s/ Regis Bosse				*Name:	Regis Bosse 

Title:	President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

		*
# C_2017441EN.01000101.xml

| 22.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 441/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 441/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8680 — Bain Capital/Toshiba Memory Corporation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 441/01)

On 14 December 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8680. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8680. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
China Green Energy Industries, Inc.: Exhibit 10.32 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.32

Loan Agreement between Changzhou City Wujin Best Electronic
Cables Co., Ltd., and Pudong Development Bank Changzhou Branch, pursuant to
which Pudong Development Bank Changzhou Branch provided a loan with a total
amount of RMB10,000,000. The loan term is from September 20, 2011 to March 19,
2012. The annual interest rate is 7.93%, which is 130% of the benchmark interest
rate published by the People's Bank of China.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T MOUS T AF A E L S AY E D H AR I DY , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 72497 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 618- 096 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r9, 2012 ** B efo re: R A W L IN S O N , M U R G U IA , an dW A T F O R D , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M o u s ta f aE l S ay e dH ar id y , an a tiv e o f S au d i A r ab iaa n dc itiz e n o f E g yp t, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rde ny i ng h is m o tio n to r e o p e n p r o c e e d in g s b a s e do n in e f f e c tiv e a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the 

# FI LED OC T 15 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 72497 2 d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , an dr e v ie w d e n o v o du e p r o c e s s c la im s . Moh am m ed v . G o n z a les , 400 F . 3d 785, 791- 92 ( 9th C i r . 2005) . W e de nythe pe t i t i on f or r e v ie w . T he B IA di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng H ar i dy’ s m ot i on t o reopen b e c au s e h e f

a ile dto s h o w th a t h e w a s p r e ju d ic e db yh is f

o rm e rc o u n s e l’s c o n du c t. Se e id. at7 9 3 -9 4 (p rej u d i ce resu l t s w h en “ th e p erfo rm an ce o f co u n sel w as so i nadequ at e thati tm ayhave aff ec t ed the ou t com e of the proceedi ng s” (i nt ernal q u o ta tio n m ark s o m itte d ) ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
Order entered October 13, 2017 

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00539-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.R.M., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-09646

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s October 11, 2017 unopposed fifth motion to extend time 

for filing brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than October 16, 

2017.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Kenneth Hicks, President and a director of Argentex Mining Corporation (Principal Executive Officer), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Argentex Mining Corporation for the interim period ended July 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Argentex Mining Corporation

Dated:  September 13, 2006

 

/s/ Kenneth Hicks                              

Kenneth Hicks

President and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Argentex Mining Corporation and will be retained by Argentex Mining Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Kentucky River Properties LLC (the "Company") Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carroll
R. Crouch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1). The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2). The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:    August 14, 2002                  By:       /s/ Carroll R. Crouch
                                              --------------------------------
                                                      Carroll R. Crouch
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-78,099-01

EX P ARTE GUADALUP E LOPEZ, A ppl icant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 10-10-06789-M CRAJA INTHE 365 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM MAVERICK

COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 4 1 8 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of marihuana

and sente nced to ten year s’ imprisonment. He did not appea l his conviction. Applicant contends th at his trial counsel rende red ineffe ctive assistance beca use counsel abandoned th e n egotiated cap on sentenc ing and argued for shock probation without deter mining whether Applicant wa s elig ible for r elea se to shock probation. The trial court has deter

mined that trial counsel, r etained f or sentenc ing, did not know that Applicant was ineligible for shock probation, and that he did not re v iew the Code of Criminal2

Procedur e’s r equire ments for shock probation befor e arguing for the same at sentenc ing. T he trial court also found that, had counsel not pursued shock probation in exchang e for an abandonme nt of the previously neg otiated cap, th e trial court would not have exceede d that cap in sentenc ing Applicant. We f

ind that c ounsel rende red ine ffe ctive assistanc e. Relief is grante d. The sentenc e in Cause No. 10-10-06789- MCRAJ A in the 365 District Court of Maverick County is set aside, and t h Ap p l i cant is rema

nded to the custody of the Sheriff of Maverick County for re- sentenc in g i n
acc ordanc e with the orig inal plea agree ment, which the trial court is order ed to re- instate. The trial court shall issue any nece ssary bench war rant within 10 day s afte r the mandate of this Court issues. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Dep a r tm ent of Criminal J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: Marc h 12, 2014 Do not publish
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

      I, Fred B. Zaziski, certify that:

      1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form  10-QSB/A  of Falcon
Natural Gas Corp.

      2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not  contain any
untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary
to make the  statements  made,  in light of the  circumstances  under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

      3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

      4. The registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have;

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal  control
over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the  period  covered by this
quarterly  report  that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,  based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial  reporting,  to
the  registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee of  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weakness  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

      Date: January 23, 2006            /s/ Fred B. Zaziski
                                        -------------------------------
                                            Fred B. Zaziski
                                            Principal Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 
 
 
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of ULURU Inc.
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant
 to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of ULURU Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of ULURU Inc. does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:
 
 (1.)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2.)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 Date: November 15, 2010

/s/ Kerry P. GrayKerry P. GrayPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
No. 09-9712.

#### Conrad Cooper, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1102, 130 S. Ct. 2388,

176 L. Ed. 2d 785,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3533.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Jus*786tice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 354 Fed. Appx. 439.
No. 09-9594.

#### Ismael Castro, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

559 U.S. 1098, 130 S. Ct. 2386,

176 L. Ed. 2d 778,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3578.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Miscellaneous Docket No. 903

ZOLTEK CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Respondent,

v.

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION,

Defendant-Petitioner.

On Petition for Permission to Appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)

from the United States Court of Federal Claims in case no. 96-CV-166,

Judge Edward J. Damich.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Zoltek Corporation's unopposed motion for an extension

of time, until June 15, 2009, to file its response to Lockheed Martin Corporation's

petition for permission to appeal,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

JUN - 8 2009

/s/ Jan Horbalv

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk	"V taIt ?MrPOR

JUN 0 8 2009

CLERK
cc:	Richard T. Ruzich, Esq.

Gary L. Hausken, Esq.

Dean A. Monco, Esq.

2009-M903	 2
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 08-0012

IN RE  TRACTOR SUPPLY CO. OF TEXAS LP D/B/A TRACTOR  SUPPLY COMPANY #1120 AND TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

**ORDERED:**

1.Relators’ motion for emergency relief, filed January 7, 2008, is granted.   The trial scheduled for January 14, 2008 in Cause No. 07-05-45861, styled *Chris Gomez and Sharon Gomez individually and as representatives of the Estate of Miguel Andres Gomez v. Tractor Supply Co. of Texas, L.P., d/b/a Tractor Supply Company #1120; Tractor Supply Company and Johnston Industries, Inc.*, in the 79th District Court of Jim Wells County, Texas, is stayed pending further order of this Court.

2.The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this Court.

Done at the City of Austin, this January 11, 2008.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
No. 09-9391.

#### David Lynn Hall, Jr., Petitioner v. Virginia.

559 U.S. 1078, 130 S. Ct. 2114,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3336,

176 L. Ed. 2d 741,

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
No. 09-9567.

#### Marcus Lynn Foster, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1080, 130 S. Ct. 2121,

176 L. Ed. 2d 745,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3211.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 358 Fed. Appx. 523.
---

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kenneth Hicks, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Argentex Mining Corporation;

2.      Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the
financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;

4.      The small business issuers
other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a)     
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)     
Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(c)     
Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.      The small business issuers
other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's
auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a)      All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

(b)      Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial
reporting.

Date: April 4, 2008

|/s/
      Kenneth Hicks       | 
|----------------------------- | 
|Kenneth Hicks                 | 
|President and Director        | 
|(Principal Executive Officer) | 

---
No. 11-445.

#### Farmers Insurance Company of Oregon, et al., Petitioners v. Mark Strawn.

565 U.S. 1177, 132 S. Ct. 1142,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1017,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 987.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Oregon denied.

Same case below, 350 Or. 336, 258 P.3d 1199.