alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
POWER OF ATTORNEY
   Signature
    
    Capacity
    
    Date/s/Michael N. Christodolou

Michael N. Christodolou
    
    Chairman of the Board of
Directors
    
    November 5, 2009/s/ HOWARD G. BUFFETT

Howard G. Buffett
    
    Director
    
    November 5, 2009/s/ W. THOMAS JAGODINSKI

W. Thomas Jagodinski
    
    Director
    
    November 5, 2009/s/ J. DAVID MCINTOSH

J. David McIntosh
    
    Director
    
    November 5, 2009/s/ MICHAEL C. NAHL

Michael C. Nahl
    
    Director
    
    November 5, 2009/s/ MICHAEL D. WALTER

Michael D Walter
    
    Director
    
    November 5, 2009/s/ WILLIAM F. WELSH II

William F. Welsh II
    
    Director
    
    November 5, 2009
 72
No. 09-7218.

#### Allan Austin, Petitioner v. Terry McCann, Warden.

559 U.S. 1032, 130 S. Ct. 1944,

176 L. Ed. 2d 408,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2492.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1121, 130 S. Ct. 1067, 175 L. Ed. 2d 899, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 258.
Defense
Nuclear
Facilities
Safety
Board

Washington, DC 20004

Policy
Statement

PS-8

Date: June 27, 2018

Subject

Policy Statement on Oversight of
Department of Energy Defense
Nuclear Facility Standards.

Summary

This policy statement establishes
the approach the Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board will take to
review and evaluate Department
of Energy defense nuclear facility
standards.

Bruce Hamilton
Acting Chairman



I, Background

The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board’s (Board) enabling statute requires the
Board to review and evaluate the content and implementation of the standards relating to the
design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of defense nuclear facilities of the
Department of Energy (DOE) (including all applicable DOE orders, regulations, and
requirements) at each DOE defense nuclear facility.

IL. Definition

Standards—The Board considers the word “standards,” as used in its enabling statute, to
include DOE regulations, policies, notices, orders, guides, technical standards, and any other
directive that DOE or the National Nuclear Security Administration uses to promulgate policy,
requirements, or guidance related to safety at defense nuclear facilities.

Ill. Policy

e  Itis the policy of the Board to review and evaluate the content and implementation of
DOE standards. The Board shall, in the conduct of its oversight role, identify
inconsistencies in implementation across the complex as well as best practices.

e The Board will determine which standards will be reviewed on an annual basis and will
communicate its determination to DOE, but will reserve the right to add reviews as it
deems necessary. The Board will consider standards that have complex-wide effect and
establish controls for high-hazard activities, in prioritizing the review of DOE standards.

e Following review of such standards, the Board will issue a formal Board
Recommendation to communicate specific measures that should be adopted to ensure that
public health and safety are adequately protected.

e The Board will communicate necessary changes in the content and implementation of
standards, as well as matters on which additional data or additional research is needed, as
part of formal Board Recommendations that should be adopted to ensure that public
health and safety are adequately protected.

e The Board will use other statutory tools to gather information from DOE necessary to
review and evaluate the content and implementation of DOE standards.

e The Board may formally communicate to DOE its independent analysis and advice
regarding DOE standards.

e Asummary of all standards reviewed by the Board, their status, and Board disposition
will be publicly available on the Board’s website.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 30633 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Miquon Rachal,**
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:20

- CR

- 261

- 1

Before **Higginbotham, Higginson,** and **Duncan,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  *
The attorney appointed to represent Miquon Rachal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rachal has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 2, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-30633 Document: 00516303630 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/02/2022No. 21

- 30633

2 relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 21-30633 Document: 00516303630 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/02/2022
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
FOR THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [Reserved]c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Michael J. AlberName: Michael J. Alber
Title: Principal Financial Officer
 50
No. 11-7242.

#### Michael W. Moton, Petitioner v. Ohio.

565 U.S. 1161, 132 S. Ct. 1099,

181 L. Ed. 2d 986,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 801.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Summit County, denied.
Powers of Attorney, Theodore A. Mathas


 Exhibit (10)(j) 

NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY CORPORATION 
 POWERS OF ATTORNEY FOR A LIMITED PURPOSE 
 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of
the undersigned constitutes and appoints each of Matthew M. Grove, Thomas F. English, Paul W. Horrocks, Linda M. Reimer and George E. Silos, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, each with full power of substitution and resubstitution
for him in his name, place and stead, to sign any and all registration statements or other filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission or any state regulatory agency or authority applicable to New York Life Insurance and Annuity
Corporation Variable Annuity Separate Account – II (File Number 033-53344) and any amendments or supplements thereto, and withdrawals thereof, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission or any state regulatory agency or authority granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he might or could do in person in his capacity as a Director or officer of New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corporation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. 
 These Powers of Attorney may be signed in one or more counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same document. 
  

			
		
	  
 Christopher T. Ashe
	  	  

Steven D. Lash

		
	  
 Christopher O. Blunt
	  	 /s/ Theodore A. Mathas
 Theodore A. Mathas

		
	  
 Frank M. Boccio
	  	  
 Mark W. Pfaff

		
	  
 Stephen P. Fisher
	  	  
 Arthur H. Seter

		
	  
 John T. Fleurant
	  	  
 Michael E. Sproule

		
	  
 Robert M. Gardner
	  	  
 Joel M. Steinberg

		
	  
 Solomon Goldfinger
	  	  
 Susan A. Thrope


 Dated: April 4, 2012
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

DONNA L. MEANOR, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT WAGNER, SR., DECEASED; FAIRMAN DRILLING COMPANY; ALAN R. FAIRMAN; SANDRA R. FAIRMAN; RONALD R. FAIRMAN; BEVERLY A. FAIRMAN; RICHARD M.
FAIRMAN; GARY D. FAIRMAN; FRANK G. FAIRMAN;TERRY L. FAIRMAN; WILLIAM WOOD AND BETTY WOOD, HIS WIFE; DOLORES M. WAGNER; DOLORES J. WAGNER; COUNTY

- WIDE REAL ESTATE COMPANY, INC.; B. LEONARD BRODY; PATRICK F. MCCARTHY; E. JAMES TRIMARCHI; DAVID R. TOMB; WAGNER AND

WAG NER; JAMES CARSON AND SUSAN CARSON, HIS WIFE,

Respondents

v.

PEOPLES NATURAL GAS COMPANY, LLC, AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO EQUITABLE GAS COMPANY, A

DIVISION OF THE FORMER EQUITABLE RESOURCES, INC.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 130 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

DONNA L. MEANOR, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT WAGNER, SR., DECEASED; FAIRMAN DRILLING COMPANY; ALAN R. FAIRMAN; SANDRA R. FAIRMAN; RONALD R. FAIRMAN; BEVERLY A. FAIRMAN; RICHARD M. FAIRMAN; GARY D. FAIRMAN; FRANK G. FAIRMAN;TERRY L. FAIRMAN;

WILLIAM WOOD AND BETTY WOOD, HIS WIFE; DOLORES M. WAGNER; :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 131 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court[ 130 WAL 2019 and 131 WAL 2019 ]

- 2

DOLORES J. WAGNER; COUNTY

- WIDE REAL ESTATE COMPANY, INC.; B. LEONARD BRODY; PATRICK F. MCCARTHY; E. JAMES TRIMARCHI; DAVID R. TOMB; WAGNER AND WAGNER; JAMES CARSON AND SUSAN CARSON, HIS WIFE,

Responden ts

v.

PEOPLES NATURAL GAS COMPANY, LLC, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO EQUITABLE GAS COMPANY, LLC F/K/A EQUITABLE GAS COMPANY, A

DIVISION OF THE FORMER EQUITABLE RESOURCES, INC.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of October, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
No. 09-9020.

#### Domingo Vega, Petitioner v. Catherine C. McVey, et al.

559 U.S. 1073, 130 S. Ct. 2100,

176 L. Ed. 2d 732,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3275.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RONALD MACNEAL SR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 41 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of August, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
No. 09-8352.

#### In re Randy Jackson, Petitioner.

559 U.S. 1059, 130 S. Ct. 2369,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2934.

176 L. Ed. 2d 580,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 903, 130 S. Ct. 1316, 175 L. Ed. 2d 1106, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 790.
No. D-2467.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Montgomery Blair Sibley.

559 U.S. 1002, 130 S. Ct. 1947,

176 L. Ed. 2d 411,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2535.

March 22, 2010.

Montgomery Blair Sib-ley, of Washington, District of Columbia, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeWorking With DLAApplicationsDetails

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# ESales -  DLA Disposition Services ESales

Access ESales **Access ESales: https://www.sales.dla.mil/dlab2b/init.do

----

## ESales Information

The DLA Disposition Services Sales office manages the sale of surplus Department of Defense (DOD) property deemed appropriate and safe for the general public.Your account will be disabled if you do not log in at least once every 30 days. If this occurs, contact the Customer Interaction Center (CIC) at 1-877-DLA-CALL, to request that your account be re-enabled.

----

## ESales Functionality

                                  -  Browse auctions by geographical region (availability is based on Eastern Standard Time) 
                                  -  Submit bids (bids must be submitted in USD currency) 
                                  -  Access Sales documents 
                                  - View auction results

----

## Related Links

                                  -  View Sales Documents 
                                  -  View Auction Results 

----

## Assistance and Contact Information

DLA Customer Interaction Center (DLA CIC) at ** 1-877-352-2255 or** dlacontactcenter@dla.mil.

disposition services
No. 09-9218.

#### Tony Lamar Burris, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1042, 130 S. Ct. 2075,

176 L. Ed. 2d 424,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2861.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 354 Fed. Appx. 308.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary 

# AGENCY:

DoD, Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee. 

# ACTION:

Notice of revised non-foreign overseas per diem rates. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee is publishing Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin Number 261. This bulletin lists revisions in the per diem rates prescribed for U.S. Government employees for official travel in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands and Possessions of the United States. AEA changes announced in Bulletin Number 194 remain in effect. Bulletin Number 261 is being published in the                         **Federal Register**                         to assure that travelers are paid per diem at the most current rates.                     

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         January 1, 2009.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This document gives notice of revisions in per diem rates prescribed by the Per Diem Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee for non-foreign areas outside the continental United States. It supersedes Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin Number 260. Distribution of Civilian   Personnel Per Diem Bulletins by mail was discontinued. Per Diem Bulletins published periodically in the                     **Federal Register**                     now constitute the only notification of revisions in per diem rates to agencies and establishments outside the Department of Defense. For more information or questions about per diem rates, please contact your local travel office. The text of the Bulletin follows:                 

Dated: December 30, 2008. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,  Department of Defense.

      ( print page 803)          ( print page 804)          ( print page 805)          ( print page 806)          ( print page 807)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P 

 [FR Doc. E9-46 Filed 1-7-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
H. R. 4912

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the seventh day of January, two thousand and six 

An Act 

To amend section 242 of the National Housing Act to extend the exemption for 

critical access hospitals under the FHA program for mortgage insurance for hospitals.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Health Care Capital 

Access Act of 2006’’. 

SEC. 2. EXTENSION. 

Paragraph (1) of section 242(i) of the National Housing Act 

(12 U.S.C. 1715z–7(i)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘July 31, 2006’’ 

and inserting ‘‘July 31, 2011’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**Exhibit31.2**

**OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

I, Edward O. Irion, certifythat:

1.               I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc.;

2.               Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and have:

a)              Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)             Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c)              Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a)              All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)             Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: December 15, 2006

 
|        | /s/ Edward O. Irion      |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Edward O. Irion          |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

 

1

----