alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4434]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLMT922200-09-L13100000-FI0000-P;NDM 90111]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 
NDM 90111

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Per 30 U.S.C. 188(d), Whiting Oil and Gas Corporation, True 
Oil LLC, and Williams Production Rocky Mountain Company timely filed a 
petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease NDM 90111, Billings 
County, North Dakota. The lessees paid the required rental accruing 
from the date of termination.
    No leases were issued that affect these lands. The lessees agree to 
new lease terms for rentals and royalties of $10 per acre and 16\2/3\ 
percent or 4 percentages above the existing competitive royalty rate. 
The lessees paid the $500 administration fee for the reinstatement of 
the lease and $163 cost for publishing this Notice.
    The lessees met the requirements for reinstatement of the lease per 
Sec. 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). 
We are proposing to reinstate the lease, effective the date of 
termination subject to:
    <bullet> The original terms and conditions of the lease;
    <bullet> The increased rental of $10 per acre;
    <bullet> The increased royalty of 16\2/3\ percent or 4 percentages 
above the existing competitive royalty rate; and
    <bullet> The $163 cost of publishing this Notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teri Bakken, Chief, Fluids 
Adjudication Section, BLM Montana State Office, 5001 Southgate Drive, 
Billings, Montana 59101-4669, 406-896-5091.

    Dated: February 25, 2009.
Teri Bakken,
Chief, Fluids Adjudication Section.
 [FR Doc. E9-4434 Filed 3-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
No. 09-1099.

#### Sholom Rubashkin, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1070, 130 S. Ct. 2120,

176 L. Ed. 2d 727,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3286.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Order 2011-11-3

Served: November 2, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 2

nd day of November, 2011

Application of

FRIENDSHIP AIRWAYS, INC.

 d/b/a YELLOW AIR TAXI

for authority to resume scheduled passenger 

operations as a commuter air carrier under 

49 U.S.C. § 41738

 Docket DOT-OST-2005-21533

FINAL ORDER

By Order 2011-10-9, issued on October 18, 2011, we directed all interested persons to show 

cause why we should not make final our tentative findings and conclusions that the Department 

should revoke the Commuter Air Carrier Authorization issued to Friendship Airways, Inc. d/b/a 

Yellow Air Taxi and deny its application to resume commuter operations, pursuant to 

49 U.S.C. § 40109(f) and 14 CFR Part 298. 

Interested persons were given 14 days to file objections to the order.

No objections to the show cause order were received.

ACCORDINGLY,

1. We revoke the Commuter Air Carrier Authorization issued to Friendship Airways, Inc. 

d/b/a Yellow Air Taxi;

2. We deny the application to resume commuter operations submitted in Docket DOT-OST2005-21533 by Friendship Airways, Inc. d/b/a Yellow Air Taxi.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
2

3. We will serve a copy of this order on the persons listed in Attachment A.

By:

SUSAN L. KURLAND

Assistant Secretary for Aviation

and International Affairs

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at

http://www.regulations.gov
Attachment A

SERVICE LIST FOR

FRIENDSHIP AIRWAYS, INC.

d/b/a YELLOW AIR TAXI

MR CHRISTOPHER BEHNAM

FRIENDSHIP AIRWAYS INC

2680 NE 24 STREET

POMPANO BEACH FL 33064

 

MR WILLIAM J WEBER

CERTIFICATION SECTION 

MANAGER

FAA AFS-900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166

 

 REGIONAL COUNSEL

 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

 SOUTHERN REGION

 POST OFFICE BOX 20636

 ATLANTA GA 30320

 

 

 MR JERRY PROENZA

 POI FOR FRIENDSHIP AIRWAYS INC

2895 SW 145TH AVENUE

SUITE 120

MIRAMAR FL 33027

MS ANNE SUISSA RTS-42

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E-36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

 

 

MR PETER LYNCH AGC-300

FAA ASST CHIEF COUNSEL

FOR ENFORCEMENT

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW 

WASHINGTON DC 20591

MR BERNARD STANKUS, RTS-42

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E-36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. §1350



In connection with the quarterly report of Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William B. Olson, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This Certification has not been, and shall not be
deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.



|Date: December 9, 2003 |  |                                                       
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|                       | 
|                       |  | /s/ WILLIAM B. OLSON                                  
|                       |  | William B. Olson Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Office *of the* Director *of*  National Intelligence
 
 
 HOME GLOBAL TRENDS REPORT FIVE-YEAR REGIONAL OUTLOOKS  | DEEPER LOOKS MEDIA & DOWNLOADS
 Print
			
		
	
	
		
								Menu Show/Hide
INTRODUCTION
Foreword
Key Themes
Executive Summary
The COVID Factor: Expanding Uncertainty
STRUCTURAL FORCES
Structural Forces: Setting the Parameters
Demographics and Human Development
Future Global Health Challenges
Environment
Economics
Technology
EMERGING DYNAMICS
Emerging Dynamics: Societal, State, and International
Societal: Disillusioned, Informed, and Divided
State: Tensions, Turbulence, and Transformation
International: More Contested, Uncertain, and Conflict Prone
The Future of Terrorism: Diverse Actors, Fraying International Efforts
SCENARIOS FOR 2040
Scenarios for 2040: Charting the Future Amid Uncertainty
Renaissance of Democracies
A World Adrift
Competitive Coexistence
Separate Silos
Tragedy and Mobilization
REGIONAL FORECASTS
20-year Projections
Latin America
Europe
Russia and Eurasia
Middle East & North Africa
Sub-Saharan Africa
South Asia
North East Asia
South East Asia
Oceania
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Acknowledgements
**REGIONAL FORECASTS**
EUROPE
*(EUROPE - Click image to enlarge)*
 Officeof the DirectorofNational Intelligence


Contact ODNI

          ODNI Centers
National Counterterrorism CenterNational Counterintelligence and Security CenterNational Counterproliferation and Biosecurity CenterCyber Threat Intelligence Integration CenterForeign Malign Influence Center

           Oversight
Equal Employment OpportunityIC Inspector GeneralIC Diversity Equity Inclusion and AccessibilityCivil Liberties, Privacy, and TransparencyOffice of General CounselMore Offices

          Information
IC IG HotlineNo FEAR ActPrivacy PolicyCustomer ServiceAccessibilityFOIASystem of Record Notices

          Useful Links
For KidsReady.govOpen.govFlu.govPlain Language ActODNI Operating StatusCoronavirus Disease GuidanceAdobe Acrobat Reader
No. 09-8591.

#### Alex Yalda, Petitioner v. California.

559 U.S. 1072, 130 S. Ct. 2096,

176 L. Ed. 2d 730,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3360.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, denied.
exhibit10-19.htm


EXHIBIT 10.19







PEOPLES BANCORP INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K


FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010







SUMMARY OF BASE SALARIES FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


OF PEOPLES BANCORP INC.







The base salaries of executive officers of Peoples Bancorp Inc. (“Peoples”) are determined by evaluating the most recent comparative peer data and the role and responsibilities of their positions.  Individual salary increases are reviewed annually and are based on Peoples’ overall performance and the executive’s attainment of specific individual business objectives during the preceding year.







The following table details the base salaries to paid by Peoples and its subsidiaries to David L. Mead, President and Chief Executive Officer of Peoples, and the four other most highly compensated executive officers of Peoples for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011:








	
Name

	
Position/Title

	
Base Salary


	
David L. Mead

	
President and Chief Executive Officer

	
$ 250,000


	  	  	  
	
Edward G. Sloane

	
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

	
201,000


	  	  	  
	
Daniel K. McGill

	
Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Lending Officer

	
212,000


	  	  	  
	
Richard W. Stafford

	
Executive Vice President, Retail Banking

	
195,000


	  	  	  
	
Joseph S. Yazombek

	
Executive Vice President, Chief Lending Officer

	
220,000
No. 09-513.

#### Jim Henry Perkins, et al., Petitioners v. Department of Veterans Affairs, et al.

559 U.S. 991, 130 S. Ct. 1755,

176 L. Ed. 2d 212,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2237.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 572 F.3d 868.
No. 09-8917.

#### Thomas L. Bates, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

559 U.S. 1066, 130 S. Ct. 2139,

176 L. Ed. 2d 720,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3279.

April 19, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7544
TIDES JERRY NEWTON, III; JAMES EDWARD MAY, II, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus RICHARD YOUNG, Reg. Administrator; SERGEANT PRUITT; MOSLEY, Correctional Officer; E. B. WALKER, Major; DOW, Correctional Officer; LIEUTENANT WHITE; R. M. LANDON; SERGEANT WHITEHEAD; O. B. WHITE, Lieutenant, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-829-2) Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 18, 1996 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tides Jerry Newton, III, James Edward May, II, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Newton v. Young , No. CA-95-829-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 18, 1995).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

DEVON DUCHAUNT JONES,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-30226

D.C. No. 3:04-cr-00517-RE

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

James A. Redden, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 18, 2013** 

Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Devon Duchaunt Jones appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying

his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

FILED

JUN 21 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Jones contends that he is eligible for a sentence reduction because his

Guideline range at sentencing was calculated under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1 and that

range was subsequently lowered by Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines. 

We review de novo whether a district court has authority to modify a sentence

under section 3582(c)(2). See United States v. Pleasant, 704 F.3d 808, 810 (9th

Cir. 2013). 

To determine whether a sentence reduction is warranted under section

3582(c)(2), the court must calculate the Guidelines range that would have been

applicable to the defendant if the amendment had been in effect at the time the

defendant was sentenced. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(b)(1). Jones is a career offender

and, had the amendment been in effect at his sentencing, the applicable Guidelines

range would have been the career offender range. See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1(b). That

range is identical to the range used at his original sentencing. Therefore,

Amendment 750 did not lower Jones’s applicable Guidelines range, and he is

ineligible for a sentence reduction. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2); U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10

cmt. n.1(A); United States v. Waters, 648 F.3d 1114, 1116-17 (9th Cir. 2011).

In light of this disposition, we decline to reach Jones’s remaining

contentions.

AFFIRMED.
No. 09-9134.

#### John B. Mardesich, Petitioner v. Washington.

559 U.S. 1076, 130 S. Ct. 2108,

176 L. Ed. 2d 737,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3374.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1, denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MATTHEW SCOTT BECKER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 462 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7th day of January, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

RICHARD D. MICKMAN,

Respondent

v.

ELAINE MICKMAN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 65 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of May, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
No. 09-9806.

#### Alvis Guzman, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1099, 130 S. Ct. 2390,

176 L. Ed. 2d 781,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3621.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned, Hamish Malkin, of Argentex Mining Corporation,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Argentex Mining
Corporation for the interim period ended October 31, 2007 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Argentex Mining Corporation

Dated: April 8, 2008

|/s/
      Hamish Malkin          | 
|-------------------------------- | 
|Hamish Malkin                    | 
|Chief Financial Officer          | 
|(Principal Financial Officer and | 
|Principal Accounting Officer)    | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Argentex Mining
Corporation and will be retained by Argentex Mining Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JANICE DUNCAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2022-3087

[January 11, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Barbara R. Duffy, Judge; L.T. Case No. 19013410CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Christine C. Geraghty, 

Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 09-9313.

#### Isaac Dewayne Russell, Petitioner v. Teri Kennedy, et al.

559 U.S. 1097, 130 S. Ct. 2382,

176 L. Ed. 2d 776,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3504.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
No. 09-1118.

#### Curious Theatre Company, et al., Petitioners v. Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, et al.

560 U.S. 906, 130 S. Ct. 3288,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1186,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3998.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Colorado denied.

Same case below, 220 P.3d 544.
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report of Studio One Media, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Preston
J. Shea, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/   Preston
      J. Shea
                -----------------------------
                Preston
      J. Shea
                President
                September
      29, 2008
 
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-KSB solely pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed
as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure
document.
No. 09A827 (09-1250).

#### Richard I. Fine, Applicant v. Leroy D. Baca, Sheriff, Los Angeles County, California, et al.

559 U.S. 1090, 130 S. Ct. 2396,

176 L. Ed. 2d 766,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3572.

April 26, 2010.

Application for stay, addressed to Justice Ginsburg and referred to the Court, denied.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Terra Nostra Resources Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeff Reynolds, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  April 19, 2006

By: /s/ Jeff Reynolds

Name: Jeff Reynolds

Title:   Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
No. 09-9519.

#### Brian Keith Watts, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1057, 130 S. Ct. 2363,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3059.

176 L. Ed. 2d 576,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 352 Fed. Appx. 784.
Rt>con l · 1 Discussion 

### Docket No . FA/\-2013-0672 o : (ec ! r.1tc 

### Identifier: 

### 20 I**~-NM-058-/\D**

With whom outside the FAA has this action ht· • , d - isnasst;d 

### (i.c.~D~sign **Approv~l** Holder,



### ~ manufacture•·, ATA, NBAA,



### RAA **-:__ ~_9PA.**  **_: i**  **\:_s; ~M~,**  etc)'? _________

## _j

ORGANIZATION PE RSON CON ' l +------- 

### " /\( n -. 1 ! I - ------- - D-A- .1,..--,

_ E_ _ ___ lC5PiCSmsc LI SSED

**---~-~~- -~**  **~~ ~**  ---- .L_ ___________________ _ ____________

.. 

### - t--- ----- ----- - ----- -- - - - - - ------1 ---- -- - 

### -- -- ----- 1- -- -- - - ----- --



### --- ----- - ------- --- -- - --- ---------- -- -; 

### 1--- ------ -- -- - --r----- - ------- ---··

-- -- -- - 

### Other/Additional Informati o n: 

### This .supplc me nt<1 N PRM is being revised due to public comments as dispositionecl within this SNPRM. no addi• i • . nl 

### coordination has taken place since development of the 

### original NPIUvl.
DISMISS ; and Opinion Filed October 23, 2018.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01188

- CV

KELVIN CALLOWAY , Appellant

V.
VONCIEL JOHNSON CALL OWAY , Appellee

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 18

- 11435



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Lang, Fillmore, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Schenck
Before the Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant no longer wishes

to pursue the appeal. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

181188F.P05 /David J. Schenck/
DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE– 2

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

KELVIN CALLOWAY, Appellant

No. 05

- 18

- 01188

- CV V.

VONCIEL JOHNSON CALLOWAY, Appellee On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 18

- 11435. Opinion deliver ed by Justice Schenck. Justices Lang and Fillmore participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

It is ORDERED that appellee VONCIEL JOHNSON CALLOWAY recover her costs of this appeal from appellant KELVIN CALLOWAY.

Judgment entered this 23rd day of October, 2018.
No. 09-8416.

#### Luis Daniel Baltazar, Petitioner v. California.

559 U.S. 1072, 130 S. Ct. 2096,

176 L. Ed. 2d 730,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3407.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, denied.