alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,151                   7,151
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,855                  17,855
<ALLOWANCES>                                       298                     298
<INVENTORY>                                      4,738                   4,738
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,418                  30,418
<PP&E>                                          23,014                  23,014
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,931                   3,931
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 215,476                 215,476
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,492                  16,492
<BONDS>                                        116,702                 116,702
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,040                  79,040
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   215,476                 215,476
<SALES>                                         20,437                  44,461
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,437                  44,461
<CGS>                                           13,660                  29,081
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,660                  29,081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    20                      20
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,244                   6,454
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (975)                      89
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (5)                     786
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (970)                   (697)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (970)                   (697)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
No. 09-8696.

#### Donald G. English, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 984, 130 S. Ct. 1718,

176 L. Ed. 2d 200,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1995.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 589 F.3d 1373.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         620,765
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  254,717
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,000
<INVENTORY>                                     91,204
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               979,868
<PP&E>                                         276,571
<DEPRECIATION>                                 107,792
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,409,452
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          432,706
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       152,541
<OTHER-SE>                                     529,164
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,148,647
<SALES>                                      1,261,866
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,261,866
<CGS>                                          485,971
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,894,247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (20,133)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,098,219)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,098,219)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,098,219)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
No. 09-9832.

#### Flynard Miller, Petitioner v. Illinois.

560 U.S. 913, 130 S. Ct. 3295,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1198,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4069.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 393 Ill. App. 3d 629, 332 Ill. Dec. 727, 913 N.E.2d 659.
**Exhibit23.1**

** **

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Wehave issued our reports dated May 30, 2008 with respect to theconsolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reportingincluded in the Annual Report of MAIR Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-Kfor the year ended March 31, 2008.  We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements ofMAIR Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-49138,effective November 2, 2000, File No. 33-22977, effective February 21,1997, and File No. 33-22977, effective February 21, 1997).

 

/s/GRANT THORNTON LLP

 

Minneapolis,Minnesota

 

May 30,2008

 

 

----
## Phantom II Specs

General Features

 Ready to Fly, Multifunctional Quad

- rotor System

 Customized H3

- 2D and H3

- 3D Gimbal Support

 Precision Flight and Stable Hovering

 25min Flight Time & Smart Battery

 Auto Return

- to

- Home & Landing

 Advanced Power Management

 Intelligent Orientation Control (IOC)

 Easy Battery Replacement

 Self

- tightening Propeller

 Video Downlink Support

 CAN

- Bus Expansion Module



## Aircraft

Weight (Battery & Propellers Included) 1000g

Hover Accuracy (Ready To Fly) Vertical: 0.8m;

Horizontal: 2.5m

Max Yaw Angular Velocity 200°/s

Max Tilt Angle 35°

Max Ascent / Descent Speed Ascent: 6m/s; Descent: 2m/s

Max Flight Speed 15m/s (Not Recommended)

Diagonal Length 350mm

Flight Time 25mins

Take

- Off Weight ≤1300g

Operating Temperature

- 10°C ~ 50°C

Supported Battery DJI Smart Battery

## DJI Smart Battery

Type 3S LiPo

Capacity 5200mAh, 11.1V

Charging Environment Range 0 °C to 40 °C

Discharging Environment Range

- 20 °C to 50 °C



## 2.4GHz Remote Control

Operating Frequency 2.4GHz ISM

Communication Distan ce (Open Area) 1000m

Receiver Sensitivity (1%PER)

- 97dBm

Working Current/Voltage 120 mA@3.7V

Built

- In LiPo Battery Working Current/Capacity 3.7V, 2000mAh
Kfcv^ fe. V\c^VWCWr£ -Qcxj^iP-icU Gscjtft-4- OC C»PftSrxl?> SCo_D.oleLaJc^x^.>3_caii£,^So2_ ^cx^sLjCXn:\ oH1o3"TJjcfQ^ 785LO7 

## iH-sao-c^ *. (\n
•*r: J=?»^ -nCO en

-cnO 2:0

Cr*?sP Ho. to^-v C^a^H6~ fe^ p, YUMs, cWv: : RECEIVED IN COURTORJRKflNArAPPEACSFEB-^2^015- , ^ , AMAcedia,Clerk 

### r^g bftUol-^ "TV^c^iniK- exocx Shncc&£&1q« 

### fcsSpedrCfJillo Sc*lkPrnU-grl , c.c» lo ravfoitsipA Couigi- c^ c^-PP^U c*£L3kxc*s^. fe^>f^fe CgrAN(A-cjt Ox^A^ic^- oAAcoftjxcao, » &£Jcr3& Cou^ei 

### ^^Wig^ cWfcs> c^Cicfe., kxcN.; V76-^ OteWicA Cocj<^V QlD^ OuvA Kr^ Ur^r W_Kf ^&3Rci exs c->C ueA-s jjEvtiasuax^a.-

### j[^(aoj&aL- „ -„ . ^^^Cou^kA-^ikxtv4 s. LJ^fVahA- P)V^r^^-o^ c=> —i—i.



### _ figyra^ C)C_SV^k^GMki^ss ... -;.-A^ ^0rH-
— -~?M—-%£- GO -^-Wi.^



### _

Ccsr^s^M^^ .O^fib^ck^s/L, CtsLd 

### b^A^ob ^3_J^kotvi io^^Bchta-ir &tak,-&ora_ c\ite^pk\csic._.io 

### l^A^rH^^CsU&^XU SuOpcfeL J^XlL-SttoLCL!.- - - _ -- - — - ^h^Jik^^ 

### og_ CeQ^h^oj^^ :kx._ctau.icA£^ 

## -Vq :.o^ci^-X^ J^._.^ Tola^V_ir^.._..9^
— 

## Qcjc^gda^^ I^eas&ck:^ _?bsk

_ G^tsU^lQfc^^ - — - -- 3*. 3k&*Qc^J^..^
— 

### cxtstd. a^Jl^dai!^^ K.^bc^.£^b^ 

## 0£££&k& Ao__J^&ab££j^^ jUfcCGiUUfcjgb^s ^o.„.__ 

## ^ac^£CL,ixL ...D^^^£^ ._—,
No. 09-9393.

#### Kevin Patrick Flood, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1055, 130 S. Ct. 2358,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2959.

176 L. Ed. 2d 572,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 339 Fed. Appx. 210.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alion Science and Technology Corporation (the“Corporation”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ending December 31, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bahman Atefi, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.Date: March 12, 2008       /s/ Bahman Atefi         Name: Bahman Atefi
No. 09-9561.

#### Tremayne Scoggins, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1080, 130 S. Ct. 2120,

176 L. Ed. 2d 744,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3443.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

              SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report (the "Report") of TCI Solutions,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Lance C. Jacobs, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of
my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to TCI Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by TCI Solutions, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: August 13, 2003                          By: /s/ Lance C. Jacobs
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                      Lance C. Jacobs
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
October 19, 2015

Mr. Thomas Chapman, Esquire

Blank Rome LLP

Counsel to Philadelphia Eagles National Football League Team

130 North 18th Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103

Dear Mr. Chapman :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your exemption request , posted to the public docket on July 23, 2015, on behalf of

the Philadelphia Eagles National Football League Team filed in D ocket

No

. FAA− 20 15

− 3110 , but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition

does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the

request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of

the relief you seek

.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments availab le to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your peti tion for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT**

**TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Ihab Abu-Hakima, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Meru Networks, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Dated: May 6, 2011
No. 09-8191.

#### Warren Hester, II, Petitioner v. West Virginia.

559 U.S. 951, 130 S. Ct. 1535,

176 L. Ed. 2d 132,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1394.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denied.
No. 09-9025.

#### Emanuel T. Newman, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1020, 130 S. Ct. 1918,

176 L. Ed. 2d 389,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2387.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3445 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3445

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the work 
           geographic index floor under the Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2019

 Ms. Finkenauer (for herself and Mr. Smith of Nebraska) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
  Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the work 
           geographic index floor under the Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE WORK GEOGRAPHIC INDEX FLOOR UNDER THE 
              MEDICARE PROGRAM.

    Section 1848(e)(1)(E) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-
4(e)(1)(E)) is amended by striking ``2020'' and inserting ``2023''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 09-8996.

#### Memphis Ford Ware, Petitioner v. Florida.

559 U.S. 1052, 130 S. Ct. 2350,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3089.

176 L. Ed. 2d 568,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.

Same case below, 23 So. 3d 724.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Cirracor, Inc. a Nevada corporation
      (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Reed
      Fisher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his
      knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Cirracor, Inc., and will be retained by Cirracor, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date:
                  August 4 , 2006
                By:
                /s/ Reed
                  FisherReed
                    Fisher
                  Chief
                    Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Bernhard Hampl, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of Eon Labs, Inc.(the “registrant”), certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the registrant;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)             designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)            evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)             disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)             all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)            any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

| Date: November 13, 2003 |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
| /s/                     | Bernhard Hampl, Ph.D. |   |
| Bernhard Hampl, Ph.D.   |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

----
No. 09-9306.

#### Willie Hugh Morris, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1044, 130 S. Ct. 2081,

176 L. Ed. 2d 427,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2840.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.