Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 10, 2009 / Notices 10301 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–63,939] 

Hewlett Packard, Inkjet and Web 

Solutions Division; Including On-Site 

Leased Workers From CDI, Manpower, 

Securitas Security Services USA, Volt 

Cable Consultants, D/B/A Black Box 

Network Services Managed Business 

Solutions and 888 Consulting Group, 

Inc., D/B/A TAC Worldside, Corvallis, 

OR; Amended Certification Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and 

Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 

U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the 

Department of Labor issued a 

Certification of Eligibility to Apply for 

Worker Adjustment Assistance and 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance on September 19, 2008, 

applicable to workers of Hewlett 

Packard, Inkjet and Web Solutions 

Division, including on-site leased 

workers from CDI, Manpower, Securitas 

Security Services USA and Volt, 

Corvallis, Oregon. The notice was 

published in the Federal Register on 

October 3, 2008 (73 FR 57682). The 

certification was amended on December 

4, 2008 to include on-site leased 

workers from Cable Consultants, d/b/a 

Black Box Network Services. The notice 

was published in the Federal Register 

on December 15, 2008 (73 FR 76058). 

At the request of petitioners, the 

Department reviewed the certification 

for workers of the subject firm. The 

workers are engaged in the production 

of inkjet supplies, particularly in jet 

printer cartridge heads. 

New information shows that workers 

leased from Managed Business 

Solutions and 888 Consulting Group, 

Inc., d/b/a TAC Worldwide were 

employed on-site at the Corvallis, 

Oregon location of Hewlett Packard, 

Inkjet and Web Solutions Division. The 

Department has determined that these 

workers were sufficiently under the 

control of the subject firm to be 

considered leased workers. 

Based on these findings, the 

Department is amending this 

certification to include leased workers 

from Managed Business Solutions and 

888 Consulting Group, Inc., d/b/a TAC 

Worldwide working on-site at the Inkjet 

and Web Solutions Division, Corvallis, 

Oregon location of the subject firm. 

The amended notice applicable to 

TA–W–63,939 is hereby issued as 

follows: 

All workers of Hewlett Packard, Inkjet and 

Web Solutions Division, including on-site 

leased workers from CDI, Manpower, 

Securitas Security Services USA, Volt, 

Managed Business Solutions and 888 

Consulting Group, Inc., d/b/a TAC 

Worldwide, Corvallis, Oregon, engaged in the 

production of inkjet supplies, who became 

totally or partially separated from 

employment on or after August 26, 2007, 

through September 19, 2010, are eligible to 

apply for adjustment assistance under 

Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are 

also eligible to apply for alternative trade 

adjustment assistance under Section 246 of 

the Trade Act of 1974. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of 

February 2009. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9–5041 Filed 3–9–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers (TA–W) number and alternative 

trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by 

(TA–W) number issued during the 

period of February 17 through February 

20, 2009. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Section (a)(2)(A)—all of the 

following must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. The sales or production, or both, of 

such firm or subdivision have decreased 

absolutely; and 

C. Increased imports of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles 

produced by such firm or subdivision 

have contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in sales or 

production of such firm or subdivision; 

or 

II. Section (a)(2)(B)—both of the 

following must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. There has been a shift in 

production by such workers’ firm or 

subdivision to a foreign country of 

articles like or directly competitive with 

articles which are produced by such 

firm or subdivision; and 

C. One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

1. The country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the 

articles is a party to a free trade 

agreement with the United States; 

2. The country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the 

articles to a beneficiary country under 

the Andean Trade Preference Act, 

African Growth and Opportunity Act, or 

the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery 

Act; or 

3. There has been or is likely to be an 

increase in imports of articles that are 

like or directly competitive with articles 

which are or were produced by such 

firm or subdivision. 

Also, in order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for 

secondarily affected workers of a firm 

and a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) Significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is a supplier or downstream producer to 

a firm (or subdivision) that employed a 

group of workers who received a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

trade adjustment assistance benefits and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article that was the basis for such 

certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied for 

the firm (or subdivision) described in 

paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 

percent of the production or sales of the 

workers’ firm; or 

(B) A loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm (or subdivision) 

10302 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 10, 2009 / Notices 

described in paragraph (2) contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance to issue a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, 

the group eligibility requirements of 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

must be met. 

1. Whether a significant number of 

workers in the workers’ firm are 50 

years of age or older. 

2. Whether the workers in the 

workers’ firm possess skills that are not 

easily transferable. 

3. The competitive conditions within 

the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions 

within the industry are adverse). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W–64,952; Heritage Footwear, Inc., 

Fort Payne, AL: January 14, 2008 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W–64,802; HR Solutions, LLC, 

Subsidiary of Affiliated Computer 

Services, Pittsburgh, PA: December 

22, 2007 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

None 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA based on increased 

imports from or a shift in production to 

Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

None 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

TA–W–64,528; Fujifilm Manufacturing 

U.S.A., Inc., Greenwood, SC: 

November 24, 2007 

TA–W–64,876; Bridgestone Americas 

Tire Operations, LLC, Bato Division, 

LaVergne, TN: January 12, 2008 

TA–W–64,905; Kelsey-Hayes Company, 

North American Braking and 

Suspension Division, Leased 

Workers from Sizemore, Warrenton, 

GA: January 14, 2008 

TA–W–65,147A; Bradington-Young, 

LLC, Hickory Plant, On-Site Leased 

Workers of Manpower, Hickory, NC: 

February 5, 2008 

TA–W–65,147B; Bradington-Young, 

LLC, Cover Plant, Cherryville, NC: 

February 5, 2008 

TA–W–65,147C; Bradington-Young, 

LLC, Frames Plant, Cherryville, NC: 

February 5, 2008 

TA–W–65,147; Bradington-Young, LLC, 

Cherryville Plant, On-Site Leased 

Workers of PSU Personal Services, 

Woodleaf, NC: February 5, 2008 

TA–W–65,175; Molded Dimensions, 

Inc., Port Washington, WI: February 

6, 2008 

TA–W–65,101; Kelsey Hayes Company, 

North American Braking and 

Suspension Division, Fowlerville, 

MI: September 12, 2008 

TA–W–64,408; Theis Precision Steel 

Corporation, A Subsidiary of 

Friedrich Gustav Their 

Kaltwalzwerke, Bristol, CT: 

November 10, 2007 

TA–W–64,737A; Stillwater Mining 

Company, Stillwater Mine, Nye, 

MT: December 4, 2007 

TA–W–64,737B; Stillwater Mining 

Company, Stillwater Metallurgical 

Complex, Columbus Administration 

and Warehouse, Columbus, MT: 

December 4, 2007 

TA–W–64,737C; Stillwater Mining 

Company, East Boulder Mine, 

McLeod, MT: December 4, 2007 

TA–W–64,737; Stillwater Mining 

Company, Corporation Office, 

Billings, MT: December 4, 2007 

TA–W–64,815; Pittsburgh Corning 

Corporation, Subsidiary of PPG, Inc. 

and Corning, Inc., Port Allegany, 

PA: January 5, 2008 

TA–W–64,875; Rosboro Lumber 

Company, Lumber Division, 

Springfield, OR: November 16, 2008 

TA–W–64,983; Plum Creek Northwest 

Lumber, Inc., Pablo Sawmill, 

Leased Workers of LC Staffing, 

Pablo, MT: January 22, 2008 

TA–W–65,086; Penn Racquet Sports, 

Inc., A Subsidiary of HTM USA 

Holdings, Phoenix, AZ: February 2, 

2008 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

TA–W–64,944; Invista S.A.R.L., Leased 

Worekrs of Mundy Maintenance, 

Service and Operations, 

Waynesboro, VA: January 20, 2008 

TA–W–64,967; ARRK Product 

Development Group, San Diego, CA: 

January 14, 2008 

TA–W–64,985; JCIM, US–LLC, Formerly 

known as Plastech Engineered 

Products, Wauseon, OH: January 

22, 2008 

TA–W–64,988; Source Northwest, Inc., 

dba Source Window Coverings, 

Woodinville, WA: January 22, 2008 

TA–W–65,039; Elcoteq, Inc., Richardson 

Division, Richardson, TX: January 

29, 2008 

TA–W–65,076; Pentair Water, Water 

Systems Division, A Subsidiary of 

Pentair, Delavan, WI: January 15, 

2008 

TA–W–65,163; International Textile 

Group, Burlington Worldwide, 

Cordova, NC: January 6, 2009 

TA–W–65,172; Summit Polymers, Inc., 

Valley Plant, Portage, MI: January 

23, 2008 

TA–W–64,424; Schawk, Inc., Stamford 

Division Stamford, CT: November 

12, 2007 

TA–W–64,956; Citigroup Global 

Markets, Presentation Technologies 

Group New York, NY: January 20, 

2008 

TA–W–65,041; Alcatel-Lucent, Inc., 

Multicore Product Division, SSG 

Group Plano, TX: January 26, 2008 

TA–W–65,051; Tyco Electronics, 

Carlisle, PA: January 29, 2008 

TA–W–65,143; Goulds Pumps/ITT 

Industries, Ashland, PA: January 

21, 2008 

TA–W–65,186; Elkay Manufacturing 

Company, Elkay Distribution 

Company, Bolingbrook, IL: February 

6, 2008 

TA–W–65,198; Touch Sensor 

Technologies, LLC, Subsidiary of 

Methode Electronics, Leased 

Workers From Kay and Associates, 

Wheaton, IL: February 6, 2008 

TA–W–65,200; DimcoGray Corporation, 

Molding Department Centerville, 

OH: February 6, 2008 

TA–W–65,220; Allied Motion Motor 

Equipment, Owosso, MI: February 9, 

2008 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 10, 2009 / Notices 10303 

and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade 

Act have been met. 

TA–W–64,974; Fredon Development 

Industries, LLC, Newton, NJ: 

January 23, 2008 

TA–W–64,421; Pacific Automotive 

Components and Systems 

International, ImLay City, MI: 

November 12, 2007 

TA–W–64,870; Molded Fiber Glass Co., 

Stevenson, WA: January 12, 2008 

TA–W–64,902; Shin Etsu Handoti 

America, Inc., Leased Workers of 

Volt and Kelly Temporary, 

Vancouver, WA: January 14, 2008 

TA–W–64,960; Pax Machine Works, Inc., 

Celina, OH: January 21, 2008 

TA–W–65,102; Kelsey Hayes Company, 

North American Braking and 

Suspension Division Fenton, MI: 

February 3, 2008 

TA–W–65,178; Louis Lavitt Company, 

Inc., Hickory, NC: February 6, 2008 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA based on increased 

imports from or a shift in production to 

Mexico or Canada) and Section 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have 

been met. 

None 

Negative Determinations for Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, it has been 

determined that the requirements of 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for 

the reasons specified. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been 

met. The firm does not have a 

significant number of workers 50 years 

of age or older. 

TA–W–64,952; Heritage Footwear, Inc., 

Fort Payne, AL 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been 

met. Workers at the firm possess skills 

that are easily transferable. 

TA–W–64,802; HR Solutions, LLC, 

Subsidiary of Affiliated Computer 

Services, Pittsburgh, PA 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been 

met. Competition conditions within the 

workers’ industry are not adverse. 

None 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

Because the workers of the firm are 

not eligible to apply for TAA, the 

workers cannot be certified eligible for 

ATAA. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) 

(employment decline) have not been 

met. 

TA–W–64,420; Nordyne, Inc., On-Site 

Leased Workers From Lifestyle 

Staffing Poplar Bluff, MO. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or 

production, or both, did not decline) 

and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production 

to a foreign country) have not been met. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 

imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in 

production to a foreign country) have 

not been met. 

TA–W–64,186; American Polymers, Inc., 

Oxford, MA. 

TA–W–64,793; Lukas Confections, Inc., 

dba The Classic Caramel Co., York, 

PA. 

TA–W–64,846; Tracker Marine Group, 

LLC, Bolivar, MO. 

TA–W–64,875A; Rosboro Lumber 

Company, Plywood Division 

Springfield, OR. 

TA–W–64,875B; Rosboro Lumber 

Company, Glulam Beams Division 

Springfield, OR. 

TA–W–65,252; Hutchinson Technology, 

Inc., Plymouth, MN. 

TA–W–65,160; Hutchinson Technology, 

Inc., Hutchinson, MN. 

The workers’ firm does not produce 

an article as required for certification 

under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 

1974. 

TA–W–64,912; Road and Rail Services, 

Venice, IL. 

TA–W–65,013; Axcelis Technologies, 

Global Customer Operations, 

Portland, OR. 

TA–W–65,021; EcoLab, Inc., Accounts 

Receivable Division, Research and 

Development Division, Eagan, MN. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been 

met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is not a supplier to or a downstream 

producer for a firm whose workers were 

certified eligible to apply for TAA. 

TA–W–64,570; ZF Lemforder, LLC, 

Chicago, IL. 

I hereby certify that the 

aforementioned determinations were 

issued during the period of February 17 

through February 20, 2009. Copies of 

these determinations are available for 

inspection in Room N–5428, U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 

during normal business hours or will be 

mailed to persons who write to the 

above address. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

Dated: March 3, 2009. 

[FR Doc. E9–5037 Filed 3–9–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–64,190] 

Hafner USA, Inc., New York, NY; Notice 

of Negative Determination on 

Reconsideration 

On January 13, 2009, the Department 

issued an Affirmative Determination 

Regarding Application for 

Reconsideration of the negative 

determination regarding workers’ 

eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade 

Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) 

applicable to workers and former 

workers of Hafner USA, Inc., New York, 

New York (subject firm). The 

Department’s Notice was published in 

the Federal Register on January 26, 

2009 (74 FR 4460). 

The initial determination was based 

on the Department’s findings that the 

subject worker group does not support 

a firm or appropriate subdivision that 

produces an article domestically. 

In order to apply for TAA based on 

increased imports, the subject worker 

group must meet the group eligibility 

requirements under Section 222(a) of 

the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. 

Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the 

following criteria must be met: 

A. A significant number or proportion of 

the workers in such workers’ firm, or an 

appropriate subdivision of the firm, have 

become totally or partially separated, or are 

threatened to become totally or partially 

separated; and 

B. The sales or production, or both, of such 

firm or subdivision have decreased 

absolutely; and 

C. Increased imports of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles produced 

by such firm or subdivision have contributed 

importantly to such workers’ separation or 

threat of separation and to the decline in 

sales or production of such firm or 

subdivision. 

29 CFR 90.2 states that a group means 

‘‘three or more workers in a firm or an 

appropriate subdivision thereof’’ and 

that a significant number or proportion 

of the workers means ‘‘at least three 

workers in a firm (or appropriate 

subdivision thereof) with a work force