alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.76

PROMISSORY NOTE


DATE: AUGUST 10, 2001

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the Heartsoft, Inc. promises to pay to the order of:

                        Mr. A.J. Nassif
                        7229 South 85th East Avenue
                        Suite 100
                        Tulsa, Oklahoma 74133

the sum of $3,000 (three thousand dollars), with interest from the date written
above until paid; at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum.

This Note, together with all interest due, is payable in sixty (60) days from
the date written above.

Heartsoft shall reserve the right to prepay the principle of this Note, together
with all such accrued interest at the time of prepayment in whole or in part
prior to its due date without premium or penalty.

Heartsoft, signers, and endorsers of this Note severally waive demand,
presentment, notice of dishonor, diligence in collection and notice of protest
and agree to all extensions and partial payments before or after maturity,
without prejudice to the holder. This written Note represents the final
agreement between the parties and may not be contradicted by evidence of prior,
contemporaneous, or subsequent oral agreements of the parties.

Heartsoft, Inc.



by:   /s/ Benjamin P. Shell
      ------------------------
      Chief Executive Officer
# C_2017257EN.01000101.xml

| 8.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8422 — ChemChina/AKC/JVs)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 257/01)

On 1 August 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8422. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8422. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
No. 09-9787.

#### Amr Mohsen, Petitioner v. Carol Wu, Chapter 7 Trustee, et al.

560 U.S. 912, 130 S. Ct. 3294,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1197,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4047.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 358 Fed. Appx. 951.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

 

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

| March 25, 2008

  | By: /s/ | Brian D. Comer                                      |   |
|------------------------|---------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| (Date)

          |    | Brian D. Comer

President

 

  |   |
# C_2017317EN.01000101.xml

| 23.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8297 — GE/Baker Hughes)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 317/01)

On 31 May 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8297. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8297. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2  Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)  I, Gandolfo Verra, Chief Financial Officer of Cordia Corporation (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.    Date: March 31, 2008/s/ Gandolfo VerraChief Financial Officer    * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cordia Corporation and will be retained by Cordia Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 09-9107.

#### Courtney D. Hurt, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1022, 130 S. Ct. 1923,

176 L. Ed. 2d 393,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2434.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 574 F.3d 439.
No. 09-943.

#### Steven Salsberg, et al., Petitioners v. Trico Marine Services, Inc., et al.

559 U.S. 1086, 130 S. Ct. 2098,

176 L. Ed. 2d 756,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3236.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 340 Fed. Appx. 55.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1022 CA 13-00432**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

KIMBERLY TRATT, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

COUNTY OF CAYUGA, CAYUGA COUNTY TREASURER’S OFFICE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANT.

THE LAW FIRM OF FRANK W. MILLER, EAST SYRACUSE (FRANK W. MILLER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS.

O’HARA, O’CONNELL & CIOTOLI, FAYETTEVILLE (STEPHEN CIOTOLI OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County (Thomas G. Leone, A.J.), entered August 13, 2012. The order, among other things, denied the motion of defendants County of Cayuga and Cayuga County Treasurer’s Office for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s 10th cause of action against them and denied that part of the cross motion of plaintiff for summary judgment dismissing certain affirmative defenses.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. We write only to note that plaintiff failed to meet her burden of establishing her entitlement to partial summary judgment on liability on the 10th cause of action, for quid pro quo sexual harassment ( see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp. , 68 NY2d 320, 324; Mauro v Orville , 259 AD2d 89, 91-93, lv denied 94 NY2d 759).

Entered: October 4, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IPC Acquisition Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Greg Kenepp, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



| | By: /s/ Greg Kenepp
Greg Kenepp
President
July 10, 2003
| | -------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledeging or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to IPC Acquisition
Corp. and will be retained by IPC Acquisition Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2017337EN.01000102.xml

| 7.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8468 — NorgesGruppen/Axfood/Eurocash)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 337/02)

On 16 August 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8468. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8468. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
No. 09-9442.

#### Christopher Ysais, Petitioner v. Matthew Reynolds, et al.

559 U.S. 1111, 130 S. Ct. 2414,

176 L. Ed. 2d 931,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3814,

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the Supreme Court of New Mexico denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7157** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
YOUNG DOWELL, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Bluefield

. David A. Faber , Senior District Judge. ( 1:04

- cr - 00066

- 1 )

Submitted : September 11 , 2012 Decided: September 14, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Young Dowell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Miller A. Bushong, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Beckley, West Virginia; John J. Frail, Steven Loew, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished op inions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Young Dowell, Jr., appeals a district court order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c) (2006). The district court found Dowell was not eligible for a reduc tion under the recent amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines because his sentence was based not on a quantity of crack cocaine, but on his career offender status.

We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion denying Dowell’s motion fo r a sentence reduction. United

States v. Goines , 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (stating
standard of review). Accordingl y, we affirm the district

court’ s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process .
AFFIRMED
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5132 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource study 

to determine the suitability and feasibility of including in the National 

Park System certain sites in Monroe County, Michigan, relating to the 

Battles of the River Raisin during the War of 1812. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2006 

Mr. DINGELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 

resource study to determine the suitability and feasibility 

of including in the National Park System certain sites 

in Monroe County, Michigan, relating to the Battles of 

the River Raisin during the War of 1812. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘River Raisin National 

5 Battlefield Study Act’’. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5132 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY, MONROE COUNTY, 

2 MICHIGAN, SITES RELATING TO BATTLES OF 

3 THE RIVER RAISIN. 

4 (a) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Inte5 rior shall conduct a special resource study of sites in Mon6 roe County, Michigan, relating to the Battles of the River 

7 Raisin on January 18 and 22, 1813, and their aftermath 

8 to determine— 

9 (1) the national significance of the sites; and 

10 (2) the suitability and feasibility of including 

11 the sites in the National Park System. 

12 (b) REQUIREMENTS.—The study conducted under 

13 subsection (a) shall include the analysis and recommenda14 tions of the Secretary on— 

15 (1) the effect on Monroe County, Michigan, of 

16 including the sites in the National Park System; and 

17 (2) whether the sites could be included in an 

18 existing unit of the National Park System. 

19 (c) CONSULTATION.—In conducting the study under 

20 subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with— 

21 (1) appropriate Federal agencies and State and 

22 local government entities; and 

23 (2) interested groups and organizations. 

24 (d) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required under 

25 subsection (a) shall be conducted in accordance with Pub26 lic Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–1 et seq.). 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5132 IH 

1 (e) REPORT.—Not later than three years after the 

2 date on which funds are first made available for the study, 

3 the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Resources 

4 of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

5 Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report con6 taining— 

7 (1) the findings of the study; and 

8 (2) any conclusions and recommendations of the 

9 Secretary. 

10 (f) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

11 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are nec12 essary to conduct the study. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.2** **CERTIFICATION    PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the quarterly report on    Form 10-Q    of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp., (the    “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2008    (the “Report”) as filed with the Securities and    Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mary Jane    Robertson, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and    Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.    Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of    the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:      1.          This Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and      2.          The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company.        Dated: May 1, 2008     By: */s/ Mary Jane Robertson*
Joyce L. Connery, Chair

Thomas A. Summers, Vice Chair

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES

SAFETY BOARD

Washington, DC 20004-2901

March 29, 2024

The Honorable Jennifer M. Granholm

Secretary of Energy

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20585-1000

Dear Secretary Granholm:

The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board has received your March 21, 2024, letter

requesting a 45-day extension to provide a response regarding Recommendation 2023-1, Onsite 

Transportation Safety.

In accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 2286d(c)(1), the Board grants your request.

Sincerely,

Joyce L. Connery

Chair

c: Mr. Joe Olencz, Director, Office of the Departmental Representative to the Board
Montana Thirteenth Judicial District Court. County of Yellowstone.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- MICHAEL WILLIAM LUBKE, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-12-214

DECISION

On March 10, 2016, the Defendant’s sentence was revoked for violation of the conditions of his probation and he was sentenced to the Department of Corrections for two (2) years three hundred fifty five (355) days, for the offense of Partner or Family Member Assault, a Felony, in violation of §45-5-206, MCA. The Court recommended that the Defendant be screened for placement at Connections Corrections and upon acceptance, follow all requirements and provisions. If not accepted, Defendant was ordered to be placed at a Department of Corrections facility at the discretion of the Department. The Court granted credit for time served from October 4, 2015 through March 10, 2016.

On August 4, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant appeared by Vision Net from Butte-Silver Bow County Courthouse escorted by staff from the Connections Corrections program. He was represented by Peter Ohman of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

*76Done in open Court this 4th day of August, 2016.

DATED this 24th day of August, 2016.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member and Hon. Brad Newman, Member.
IN RE: J.H, Z.R., A.R., and D.R.

172A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 16, 2019

Sydney J. Batch, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Hatton, Meredith.

Theresa Boucher, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for Forsyth County DSS.

Brandon Duckworth, Attorney Advocate /GAL, for J.H., et al.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 17th of May 2019 by Respondent-Mother:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of May 2019."

Respondent-Mother shall have up to and including the 3rd day of July 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Terra Nostra Technology Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Regis Bosse, President and acting CFO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

	(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2)	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: August 19, 2003	By: /s/ Regis Bosse				
Name: Regis Bosse

Title: President and Acting CFO
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-14-00329- CR

Brandon Robish eaux, Appellan t

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F CO MAL CO UNTY, 207 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. CR2012 -04 2, H ONO RAB LE R. B RUCE B OY ER, JUDGE P RESIDING

O R D E R P ER CURIAM

The State’s brief was orig inally due on J uly 23, 2015. On counsel ’s m o t ion, the deadline for filing was extended to October 1. State’s co unsel has now filed a third motion reque sting that the Court extend the time for filing the State’s brief an additional 32 day s. We g rant the motion for extension of time and order State’s counsel to file a brief no later than November 2, 2015. No further extension of time will be g rante d, and failure to comply with this order will result in the case being submitt ed to this Court on the appellant’s brie f alone
.

I t is ordere d on October

6, 2015.

Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Goodwin, and B ourland Do Not Publish