alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016453EN.01000301.xml

| 3.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 453/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 453/3

---

Communication from the Kingdom of Sweden in accordance with Article 8 of the First Protocol on the interpretation by the Court of Justice of the European Communities of the Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations, opened for signature in Rome on 19 June 1980

(2016/C 453/04)

In view of the amendments made to the legal order of the Kingdom of Sweden by:

| — | Act (2010:1408) on Amendments to The Instrument of Government, specifically regarding Chapter 11 Section 1 of The Instrument of Government, |
| --- | --- |

—

Act (2010:1408) on Amendments to The Instrument of Government, specifically regarding Chapter 11 Section 1 of The Instrument of Government,

| — | Act (2016:193) to repeal the (1970:417) Market Court Act, regarding the repeal of ‘Marknadsdomstolen’, |
| --- | --- |

—

Act (2016:193) to repeal the (1970:417) Market Court Act, regarding the repeal of ‘Marknadsdomstolen’,

IN ACCORDANCE with Article 8 of the FIRST PROTOCOL on the interpretation by the Court of Justice of the European Communities of the Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations, opened for signature in Rome on 19 June 1980 annexed to the Rome Convention,

THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS SHOULD BE MADE TO THE PROTOCOL OF 19 DECEMBER 1988 ANNEXED TO THE ROME CONVENTION:

| (a) | The 14th indent of Article 2(a) should read as follows:
  ‘in Sweden, “Högsta domstolen”, “Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen” and “Arbetsdomstolen”,’. |
| --- | --- |

(a)

The 14th indent of Article 2(a) should read as follows:

‘in Sweden, “Högsta domstolen”, “Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen” and “Arbetsdomstolen”,’.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5023 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5023

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to repeal the amendments 
   made by the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 requiring documentation 
  evidencing citizenship or nationality as a condition for receipt of 
             medical assistance under the Medicaid Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 2006

 Mrs. Christensen (for herself, Mr. Jefferson, Ms. Norton, Mr. Rangel, 
 Mr. Owens, Ms. Lee, Ms. Solis, Mr. Honda, Mr. Meeks of New York, and 
Mr. Lewis of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to repeal the amendments 
   made by the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 requiring documentation 
  evidencing citizenship or nationality as a condition for receipt of 
             medical assistance under the Medicaid Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR DOCUMENTATION EVIDENCING 
              CITIZENSHIP OR NATIONALITY AS A CONDITION FOR RECEIPT OF 
              MEDICAL ASSISTANCE UNDER THE MEDICAID PROGRAM.

    (a) Repeal.--Subsections (i)(22) and (x) of section 1903 of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b), as added by section 6036 of the 
Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, are each repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 1903 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
        1396b) is amended--
                    (A) in subsection (i)--
                            (i) in paragraph (20), by adding ``or'' 
                        after the semicolon at the end; and
                            (ii) in paragraph (21), by striking ``; 
                        or'' and inserting a period;
                    (B) by redesignating subsection (y), as added by 
                section 6043(b) of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, 
                as subsection (x); and
                    (C) by redesignating subsection (z), as added by 
                section 6081(a) of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, 
                as subsection (y).
            (2) Subsection (c) of section 6036 of the Deficit Reduction 
        Act of 2005 is repealed.
    (c) Effective Date.--The repeals and amendments made by this 
section shall take effect as if included in the enactment of the 
Deficit Reduction Act of 2005.
                                 <all>
```
No. 09-9924.

#### Kenneth Coleman, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1113, 130 S. Ct. 2421,

176 L. Ed. 2d 936,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3861.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
No. 09-8135.

#### Curtis Fuller, Petitioner v. Dave J. Burnett, et al.

559 U.S. 975, 130 S. Ct. 1692,

176 L. Ed. 2d 187,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2093,

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4825 

To amend the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to require a licensee to notify 

the State, county, and public in which a facility is located whenever 

there is an unplanned release of fission products in excess of allowable 

limits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2006 

Mr. WELLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to require a 

licensee to notify the State, county, and public in which 

a facility is located whenever there is an unplanned release of fission products in excess of allowable limits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nuclear Release Notice 

5 Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NUCLEAR RELEASE NOTICE REQUIREMENT. 

7 Section 103 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 

8 U.S.C. 2133) is amended— 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4825 IH 

1 (1) by redesignating subsection f. as subsection 

2 e.; and 

3 (2) in subsection e. (as so redesignated)— 

4 (A) by designating the first, second, and 

5 third sentences as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), 

6 respectively; 

7 (B) by striking the subsection designation 

8 and paragraph (1) (as so designated) and in9 serting the following: 

10 ‘‘f. NOTICE OF UNPLANNED RELEASE OF RADIO11 ACTIVE SUBSTANCES.— 

12 ‘‘(1) NOTICE REQUIRED.— 

13 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Each license issued 

14 for a utilization facility under this section or 

15 section 104 b. shall require as a condition of 

16 the license that in case of an unplanned release 

17 described in subparagraph (B), the licensee 

18 shall immediately notify the Commission, and 

19 the State and county in which the facility is lo20 cated, of the release. 

21 ‘‘(B) UNPLANNED RELEASES.—Subpara22 graph (A) applies to any unplanned release of 

23 quantities of fission products or other radio24 active substances— 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4825 IH 

1 ‘‘(i) in excess of allowable limits for 

2 normal operation established by the Com3 mission or other applicable Federal laws or 

4 standards; and 

5 ‘‘(ii) within allowable limits for nor6 mal operation established by the Commis7 sion or other applicable Federal laws or 

8 standards but that occurs more than twice 

9 within a 2-year period originating from the 

10 same source, process, or equipment at a 

11 facility.’’; and 

12 (C) in paragraph (3) (as so designated), by 

13 striking ‘‘date of enactment of this subsection’’ 

14 and inserting ‘‘date of enactment of the Nu15 clear Release Notice Act of 2006’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4286]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Eye Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; Research Grant Applications.
    Date: March 26, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Houmam H Araj, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Research, National Eye 
Institute, NIH, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, Bethesda, MD 20892-
9602, 301-451-2020, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7c141d494c1f3c121514521b130a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f39b92c6c390b39d9a9bdd949c85">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; NEI Mentored Career Development Grant Applications (K).
    Date: March 31, 2009.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Anne E Schaffner, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Research, National Eye Institute, 
5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, MSC 9300, Bethesda, MD 20892-9300, 
(301) 451-2020, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#79181c0a39171c1057171011571e160f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="80e1e5f3c0eee5e9aeeee9e8aee7eff6">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, 
Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 23, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-4286 Filed 3-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 09-7780.

#### Richard Daron Kennedy, Petitioner v. John R. Lockett, et al.

559 U.S. 1117, 130 S. Ct. 2430,

176 L. Ed. 2d 942,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3822.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

*943Former decision, 559 U.S. 942, 130 S. Ct. 1507, 176 L. Ed. 2d 119, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 1301.
GPC Broad Summary and Slice Report
No. 09-7885.

#### In Re Barry N. Waddell, Petitioner.

559 U.S. 935, 130 S. Ct. 1514,

176 L. Ed. 2d 153,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1079.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (adopted pursuantto §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief FinancialOfficer of Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarterly period ended October 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperation of the Company.

 

Date:  December 15,2009

 
|   | /s/  Edward O. Irion      |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   |                      |
|   | Edward  O. Irion          |
|   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

1

----
No. 09-8147.

#### Joseph T. Nurek, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1071, 130 S. Ct. 2093,

176 L. Ed. 2d 729,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3369.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 578 F.3d 618.
No. 09-9409.

#### Jose A. Robles-Rodriguez, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1055, 130 S. Ct. 2363,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3109.

176 L. Ed. 2d 572,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
ex10_23.htm









Exhibit 10.23







Description of Arrangement for Directors Fees







Except as set forth below, the following sets forth the amount of fees payable to outside directors of NBT Bancorp for their services as Directors in fiscal year 2011:








	
Event

	  	
Fee


	  	  	  
	
Annual retainer

	  	
Cash (Chairman) - $50,000


	  	  	
Cash (Member) - $20,000


	  	  	
Cash (Chair) Audit and Risk Management Committee - $10,000


	  	  	
Cash (Chairs) Other Committees - $7,500


	  	  	
Restricted Stock (Member) - $20,000


	  	  	
Restricted Stock (Chairman) - $50,000


	  	  	  
	
Board meeting attended

	  	
Cash (Member) - $1,000 per meeting


	  	  	
Cash (Chairman) - $1,000 per meeting


	  	  	  
	
Telephonic board meeting

	  	
Cash (Member) - $1,000 per meeting


	  	  	
Cash (Chairman) - $1,000 per meeting


	  	  	  
	
Committee meeting attended *

	  	
Cash (Member) - $600 per meeting


	  	  	
Cash (Chairman) - $600 per meeting


	  	  	  
	
Telephonic committee meeting *

	  	
Cash (Member) - $600 per meeting


	  	  	
Cash (Chairman) - $600 per meeting












* Audit and Risk Management Committee members and Chairman receive $750 per meeting attended.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AFV Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Steele, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Richard Steele                                     			

Richard Steele |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|

|   | February			20, 2007 |
|--------|---------------------|
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                             SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with  the Annual  Report of DIMENSIONAL VISIONS INCORPORATED  (the
"Company") on Form 10KSB for the period ended  June 30, 2003  as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Preston J. Shea, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Preston J. Shea
-------------------
Preston J. Shea
President and Chief Accounting Officer


October 14, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS<F1>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                          58,332
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  256,832
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     80,840
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               396,005
<PP&E>                                       5,101,012
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,266,021
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,785,639
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,348,071
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,980,107
<COMMON>                                         7,244
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,785,639
<SALES>                                      7,700,920
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,700,920
<CGS>                                        2,279,267
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,741,441
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,472,926
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             333,699
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,126,413)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,126,413)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,126,413)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.43)
<FN>
RESULTS COVER 26 WEEKS OF ACTIVITY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Form 10-QSB of China Autoparts, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chen Weisheng, CFO of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Chen Weisheng
--------------------------
Chen Weisheng
CFO
Date: August 13, 2004
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: The State of Texas v. Damonte McField

Appellate case number: 01-20-00739-CR

Trial court case number: 2301111

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 8 of Harris County

Date motion filed: June 3, 2022

Party filing motion: Appellee

A majority of the en banc court has voted to deny appellee’s motion for en banc 

reconsideration. It is ordered that the motion is denied.

Judge’s signature: _____/s/ Julie Countiss______

Acting for the En Banc Court*

*En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly, Goodman, Landau, Hightower, 

Countiss, Rivas-Molloy, Guerra, and Farris.

Landau, J., dissenting from the denial of en banc reconsideration.

Date: ___August 23, 2022____
No. 09-8628.

#### Trinidad Reynoso, Petitioner v. L. E. Scribner, Warden.

559 U.S. 1013, 130 S. Ct. 1897,

176 L. Ed. 2d 377,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2740.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Kiran Patel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the amendment to Annual Report of Solectron Corporation on Form 10-K/A for
the annual period ended August 27, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K/A
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Solectron Corporation. Date: April 14, 2005 /s/ Kiran PatelKiran PatelExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-9731.

#### Yvett Smith, Petitioner v. Atlanta Postal Credit Union.

560 U.S. 912, 130 S. Ct. 3292,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1196,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4053,

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 350 Fed. Appx. 347.
No. 09-9800.

#### Damon Hudson, Petitioner v. Doug Vasbinder, Warden.

560 U.S. 912, 130 S. Ct. 3294,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1198,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4020,

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 09-1001.

#### H. Richard Austin, Petitioner v. Douglas G. Peterson & Associates, et al.

559 U.S. 1049, 130 S. Ct. 2353,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3020.

176 L. Ed. 2d 562,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
In the MATTER OF the APPEAL OF: SNOW CAMP LLC,

No. 445P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Lloyd C. Smith, Jr., Attorney at Law, Jonathan E. Huddleston, Attorney at Law, Lloyd C. Smith, III, Attorney at Law, Windsor, for Alamance County.

Charles B. Neely, Jr., Attorney at Law, Nancy S. Rendleman, Attorney at Law, John Holton, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Snow Camp LLC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th of December 2018 by Alamance County in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
ITEM: Shortbread Cookie(s) (CKS) MONOGRAPH NO.: KC7

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE: 341 Kilocalories.

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Off-white to tan, thick, oblong shape, sprinkled sugar on surface

ODOR: Baked, mild and sweet almond.
FLAVOR: Mildly sweet, slightly almond under-baked.
TEXTURE: Dense, firm mouth feel.

DEFETS LIKELY TO OCCUR:

APPEARANCE: Burnt, Scorched

ODOR: Staleness

FLAVOR: Staleness/rancidity, lack of almond flavor
TEXTURE: Hard/Brittle

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: When the package is first opened the

product should be smelled for off-odors, Odors that dissipate rapidly (i.e., musty, yeasty, slightly
rancid) should be noted but not scored as a surveillance defect provided no other condition factor

such as off-taste is also noted.

SPECIAL NOTES: Serviceability of the cookie is considered significantly affected when more

than 25% of the product’s volume is crushed or reduced to crumbs.

52