alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at October 31, 2000 (Unaudited)
and the Consolidated Statement of Income for the nine months ended October 31,
2000 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,229
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,780
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    199,669
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               239,110
<PP&E>                                         125,145
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 447,142
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          775,033
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   447,142
<SALES>                                        124,026
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               124,026
<CGS>                                           99,503
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   99,503
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               206,908
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,727
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (220,112)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (220,112)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05


</TABLE>
No. 09-9601.

#### Christiane M. Schliefsteiner, Petitioner v. Melinda O’Brien.

559 U.S. 1081, 130 S. Ct. 2125,

176 L. Ed. 2d 747,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3128.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 982 A.2d 1149.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.48

                             NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.
                 ENGLISH SUMMARY OF EXHIBIT WRITTEN IN JAPANESE

                          Mizonokuchi (Kawasaki) Office


1.   Document type:  lease

2.   Name of tenant--
     Novellus Systems Japan

3.   Name of landlords --
     KSP Community, K.K., an agent for KSP K.K., Nihon Mutual Life
     Insurance Company, Meiji Mutual Life Insurance Company,
     Nihon Landic Co., Ltd.

4.   Location of property --
     C-10F R&D KSP-Bldg.
     3-2-1 Sakado, Takatsu-ku, Kawasaki-shi
     Kanagawa 213
     Japan

5.   Date lease was entered into -- March 22, 1996
     Contract period -- From May 1, 1996 to April 30, 2001

6.   Effective Period:  From May 1, 1996 to April 30, 2001

7.   Rental Fee:    JPY 5,493,715 per month
                    JPY 3,331,877 per month (Common Area)

8.   Security Deposit:  JPY 61,804,296

9.   Square Footage (Area):  20,533 square feet
                      = 1,907.54 square meters
No. 09-9370.

#### Tremaine D. Williams, Petitioner v. Oklahoma.

559 U.S. 1109, 130 S. Ct. 2409,

176 L. Ed. 2d 928,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3714.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma denied.
Exhibit 35.17  LOGO 2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123) Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the Pooling and Servicing Agreement) dated as of August 1, 2017 by and among Citigroup
Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association as Trustee, Citibank, N.A., as Certificate
Administrator, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer relating to the CD 2017-CD5 Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-CD5 (CD 2017-CD5) The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of
Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the Special Servicer) herein certifies to the following:  1.
All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.  2.
A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1,
2018 to December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.  3.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has
been specifically identified herein.  Certified by:

/s/ Adam Singer



Date: March 1, 2019Adam Singer, Managing Director
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4805 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4805

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 105 North Quincy Street in Clinton, Illinois, as the ``Gene Vance 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 105 
North Quincy Street in Clinton, Illinois, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Gene Vance Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Gene Vance Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 28, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4805

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 105 North Quincy Street in Clinton, Illinois, as the ``Gene Vance 
                        Post Office Building''.
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6010** 

EMMETT RAY NALL , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. WARDEN MCCALL; ALLEN WILSON , Respondents

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville
. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. , District Judge. ( 6:11

- cv - 02771

- JFA )

Submitted : May 31 , 2012 Decided: June 5, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Emmett Ray Nall, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Emmett Ray Nall seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommend ation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealabili ty will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists woul d find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural groun ds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Nall has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 09-9428.

#### Jose Ruvalcaba, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1055, 130 S. Ct. 2364,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2970.

176 L. Ed. 2d 573,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 3.3

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                                     BYLAWS

                                       OF

                            PREMIER BANCSHARES, INC.


          The undersigned, Barbara J. Burtt, Secretary of PREMIER BANCSHARES,
INC. (the "Corporation"), hereby certifies that she has been duly elected,
qualified and is acting in such capacity and that, as such, she is familiar with
the facts herein certified and is duly authorized to certify the same, and
hereby further certifies, that:

          FIRST:    The name of the Corporation is Premier Bancshares, Inc.

          SECOND:   The By-Laws of the Corporation are hereby amended by adding
the following paragraph to replace paragraph 3.2:

               3.2  NUMBER OF DIRECTORS.  The Board of Directors shall consist
                    -------------------                                       
          of not less than four (4) or more than nineteen (19) members.  The
          number of directors may be fixed or changed from time to time, within
          the minimum and maximum set forth above, by the shareholders or the
          Board of Directors.

          THIRD:    The Amendment to the By-Laws herein certified has been duly
adopted in accordance with the provision of Article Thirteen of the By-Laws of
the Corporation.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate this
10th day of March, 1998.

                                           /s/ Barbara J. Burtt
                                    -------------------------------------
                                    Barbara J. Burtt, Secretary

                                    [CORPORATE SEAL]
No. 09-9568.

#### Ben Hickman, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1080, 130 S. Ct. 2121,

176 L. Ed. 2d 745,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3121.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly  report (the “Report”) of TCI Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof~~.~~**,**I, Victor Hamilton, Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 
| Date: August 17, 2005 | By:/s/ Victor Hamilton

Victor Hamilton

Acting Chief Executive Officer |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ MONUMENT PEAK VENTURES, LLC, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

TOSHIBA AMERICA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC., TOSHIBA CORPORATION, Defendants

- Appellees

______________________

2021

- 1052

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 8:19

- cv

- 02181

- DOC

DFM, Judge David O. Carter.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J OHN J. E DMONDS , Edmonds & Schlather, PLLC, Houston, TX, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. Also represented by S TEPHEN F. S CHLATHER

.

D OUGLAS F RED S TEWART , Bracewell LLP, Seattle, WA, argued for defendants

- appellees. Also represented by P ATRICK J AMES C ONNOLLY , J ARED S CHUETTENHELM ; D AVID J OHN B ALL , New York, NY. Case: 21-1052 Document: 49 Page: 1 Filed: 12/13/2021______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L OURIE , C LEVENGER , and P ROST , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

December 1 3 , 2021 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court Case: 21-1052 Document: 49 Page: 2 Filed: 12/13/2021
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Eon Labs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10–Q for theperiod ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William F. Holt, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|               | /s/ William  F. Holt                      |   |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|               | William F.  Holt  Chief Financial Officer |
|               |                                      |
| November 14,  2002 |

 

----
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth Hicks, of Argentex Mining Corporation,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Argentex Mining
Corporation for the interim period ended July 31, 2009 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Argentex Mining Corporation

Dated: September 11, 2009



/s/ Kenneth
HicksKenneth Hicks President and Director (Principal Executive
Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Argentex Mining
Corporation and will be retained by Argentex Mining Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
No. 09-631.

#### Elisa Encarnacion, on Behalf of Arlene George, et al., Petitioners v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security.

559 U.S. 1057, 130 S. Ct. 2342,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3100.

176 L. Ed. 2d 576,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice So-tomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 568 F.3d 72.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3437 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to allow certain funds to be used 

for incremental costs of incorporating art into facilities, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2019 

Ms. ADAMS (for herself, Ms. PINGREE, Mr. KILMER, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. 

TITUS, and Mr. GRIJALVA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to allow certain 

funds to be used for incremental costs of incorporating 

art into facilities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Saving Transit Art 

5 Resources Act’’ or the ‘‘STAR Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ALLOWING ART. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5323(h) of title 49, 

8 United States Code, is amended— 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3437 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (1) by inserting ‘‘or’’ after the 

2 semicolon; 

3 (2) by striking paragraph (2); and 

4 (3) by redesignating paragraph (3) as para5 graph (2). 

6 (b) NO SPECIAL RULE.—Section 5309 of such title 

7 is amended by striking subsection (p). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
No. 09-9440.

#### Jeremy Mouzon, aka Ferris Earl Scott Green, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1056, 130 S. Ct. 2366,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3025.

176 L. Ed. 2d 574,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 354 Fed. Appx. 739.
No. 09-8114.

#### Frank Williams, Petitioner v. Illinois.

559 U.S. 950, 130 S. Ct. 1533,

176 L. Ed. 2d 131,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1203.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 388 Ill. App. 3d 1140, 367 Ill. Dec. 610, 982 N.E.2d 288.
No. 09-7990.

#### Anthony Forte, Petitioner v. David Rock, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility.

559 U.S. 963, 130 S. Ct. 1521,

176 L. Ed. 2d 152,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1038.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 354 Fed. Appx. 567.
No. 09-854.

#### Fortis Insurance Company, Petitioner v. Jerome Mitchell, Jr.

559 U.S. 1007, 130 S. Ct. 1896,

176 L. Ed. 2d 366,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2744.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina denied.

Same case below, 385 S.C. 570, 686 S.E.2d 176.
No. 09-639.

#### David Eilender, Petitioner v. Michigan Department of Human Services.

559 U.S. 937, 130 S. Ct. 1511,

176 L. Ed. 2d 111,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1128.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**     I, Vincent E. Estrada, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the registrant, Visicu, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;          (b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];          (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on suchevaluation; and          (d) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Dated: August 7, 2006 By: /s/ Vincent E. Estrada Vincent E. Estrada      Senior Vice President and      Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-9346.

#### Injah E. Tafari, Petitioner v. Sheldon Stein, et al.

559 U.S. 1109, 130 S. Ct. 2407,

176 L. Ed. 2d 927,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3855,

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.