alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (adopted pursuant to §906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officerof Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period endedApril 30, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and thatinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

Date:  June 14,2004

 
|   | /s/ Thomas P. Friezen      |   |
|--------|----------------------------|--------|
|   |                       |
|   | Thomas P. Friezen          |
|   | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

1

----
Exhibit 35.21  LOGO 2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123) Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the Pooling and Servicing Agreement) dated as of April 1, 2017 by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. as Depositor, Well Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer, Citibank, N.A. as Certificate Administrator and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee, relating to the Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2017-P7, Commercial Mortgage Pass-through Certificates, Series 2017-P7 (CGCMT
2017-P7) The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the
Special Servicer) herein certifies to the following:  1.
All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.  2.
A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2018
through December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period), under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.  3.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof
has been specifically identified herein.  Certified by: /s/ Adam
Singer





Date: March 1, 2019Adam Singer, Managing Director
Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

MANDATE

TO THE 298TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, on the 30th day of April, 2015, the 

cause on appeal to revise or reverse the judgment between

CHELSEA DAVIS, Appellant

No. 05-14-01600-CV V.

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C., Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas.

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-14215-M.

Opinion delivered by Justice Evans. 

Justices Fillmore and Myers, participating.

was determined; and this Court made its order in these words:

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. recover its costs of this appeal 

from appellant CHELSEA DAVIS.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of the Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth District of Texas, in this behalf, and have it duly obeyed and executed.

WITNESS the HON. CAROLYN WRIGHT, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, with 

the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Dallas, this 10th day of July, 2015.

LISA MATZ, Clerk
No. 09-843.

#### Thanh Vong Hoai, et al., Petitioners v. Superior Court of the District of Columbia, et al.

559 U.S. 1007, 130 S. Ct. 1892,

176 L. Ed. 2d 365,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2645,

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 344 Fed. Appx. 620.
No. 09-9880.

#### Enrico Thomas, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1102, 130 S. Ct. 2395,

176 L. Ed. 2d 786,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3589.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 354 Fed. Appx. 439.
No. 09-9481.

#### Curtis Simmons, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1079, 130 S. Ct. 2116,

176 L. Ed. 2d 741,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3355.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

*742Same case below, 587 F.3d 348.
##### 



FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE ALION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION 2002 STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS PLAN

WHEREAS,Alion Science and Technology Corporation (Alion) adopted the Alion
Science and Technology Corporation 2002 Stock Appreciation Rights Plan (the
Plan), effective December 21, 2002; and

WHEREAS,Alion desires to amend the Plan to clarify certain provisions to
conform the payment of benefits under the Plan with distributions made under
the Alion Science and Technology Corporation Employee Ownership, Savings and
Investment Plan (the KSOP Plan);

NOW, THEREFORE,pursuant to the powers reserved in Article VII of the Plan,
Alion does hereby amend the Plan, effective as of December 21, 2002, as
follows:

Section 5.3 of the Plan is hereby amended by striking paragraphs (c) and (d)
thereof, and inserting the following paragraphs (c) and (d):

"(c) Subject to section 5.3(d), payment by the Corporation of the amount
receivable upon any exercise of a SAR shall be made by the delivery of cash in
a lump sum following the next semi-annual valuation of Alion Stock for purposes
of the Alion Science and Technology Corporation Employee Ownership, Savings and
Investment Plan (Semi-annual ESOP Valuation) after the date of exercise.
Notwithstanding any other provision in this section 5.3(c) of the Plan, the
Corporation may make payments earlier in a nondiscriminatory manner.

(d) The Administrator has the discretion to delay payment of an Award for
a period not to exceed five (5) years. If the payment is delayed beyond ninety
(90) days following the Semi-annual ESOP Valuation, interest shall accrue from
the date of such valuation. The interest shall be calculated at the prime rate
as announced in the Wall Street Journal on the date of exercise. In making this
determination, the Administrator will examine the available cash and
anticipated cash needs of the Corporation.

Except as amended by this instrument, the Plan, as previously stated, shall
remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,Alion has caused this instrument to be executed as of this
13th day of May, 2003, but effective as of December 21, 2002.

ALION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

By:
    
    /s/ Bahman Atefi


Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(A) OFTHE SARBANES — OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Michael Cannon, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Solectron Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act of1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles; c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: November 9, 2005/s/ Michael Cannon Michael Cannon
AAM

- 13

- 178

- E February 22, 2013

Exemption No. 10275 A

Reg ulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2011

- 0537

Mr. Richard Jones

Chief Pilot

Paradigm Helicopters , LLC

11811 North Brantly, Suite 206 A

Houston, TX 77034

Dear Mr

. Jones :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No.

10275

. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions and

limitations

.

The Basis for Our Decision

By submission dated May 18 , 2011 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration

(FAA) on behalf of Paradigm Helicopters, LLC (Paradigm ) f or an ex tension of Exemption

No. 10275. That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regul ations (14 CFR)

allow s Paradigm to cover its safety

- sensitive employees under one testing program

.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for gr anting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any

delay in acting on this pe tit ion would be detrimental to Paradigm

.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10275

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 4 0113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations

.2

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Paradigm are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times

whi le conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implement ed under the auspices of

the Paradigm part 135 operation, not under part 91.

Thi s exemption terminates on June 30

, 201 5 unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

James R. Fraser, M.D

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
No. 11-7487.

#### Reginald Mimms, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1132, 132 S. Ct. 1054,

181 L. Ed. 2d 773,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 301.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 440 Fed. Appx. 192.
# C_2016384EN.01000201.xml

| 18.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 384/2

---

Notice for the attention of the persons to whom measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/638/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/1839, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 concerning restrictive measures against the Republic of Guinea apply

(2016/C 384/02)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2010/638/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/1839 (2), and in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 (3).

1

2

3

The Council of the European Union has determined that the persons that appear in the abovementioned Annexes continue to fulfil the criterion set out in Decision 2010/638/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 concerning restrictive measures against the Republic of Guinea and should therefore remain subject to the measures as renewed by Decision (CFSP) 2016/1839.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the web-sites in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 8 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation before 30 June 2017, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 280, 26.10.2010, p. 10.

1

(2)  OJ L 280, 18.10.2016, p. 32.

2

(3)  OJ L 346, 23.12.2009, p. 26.

3

---
No. 09-8492.

#### Maurice J. Fagan, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 958, 130 S. Ct. 1556,

176 L. Ed. 2d 144,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1175.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 577 F.3d 10.
No. 09-8865.

#### Eugene Horton, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1041, 130 S. Ct. 2070,

176 L. Ed. 2d 421,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2871.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 348 Fed. Appx. 889.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/02 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 02 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
I, Timothy Whelan, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IPC Acquisition Corp.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures , or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b)  [omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238];  c)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.     Date:May 13, 2005 /s/ TIMOTHY WHELAN       Timothy Whelan   Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-523.

#### Michael Malloy, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 991, 130 S. Ct. 1736,

176 L. Ed. 2d 212,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2231.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 568 F.3d 166.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Companies Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

Date:    November 12, 2004       UNITED COMPANIES CORPORATION

                                  By:  /S/ Robert M. Carmichael
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                           Robert M. Carmichael
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to United Companies
Corporation and will be retained United Companies Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
WebFilings | EDGAR view


 


Exhibit 10.05
 
2011 ELECTIVE DEFERRAL AGREEMENT
Valero Energy Corporation
Deferred Compensation Plan
 
Pursuant to the Valero Energy Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”):
 
o    I elect not to participate in the Plan during 2011.
 
o    I hereby elect to defer a portion of my compensation for the period commencing January 1, 2011 and ending December 31, 2011 (the “Plan Year”) as follows:
 
Salary (elect either 1 or 2)
 
1.    ________% (in even 1% increments not to exceed 30%) of the regular salary to which I may become entitled during the Plan Year;
 
2.    $_________ per pay period of the regular salary to which I may become entitled with respect to (check either (a) or (b) below):
 
(a)    ________ all pay periods during the Plan Year
(b)    ________ the following pay periods (specify):
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
 
Bonus (elect either 3 or 4 for bonus earned in 2011 and possibly payable in 2012)
 
3.    ________% (in even 1% increments not to exceed 50%) of any cash bonuses to which I may become entitled;
 
4.    $_________ of any cash bonuses to which I may become entitled.
 
NOTE:  In order to be effective, this form must be completed, signed, and returned to Financial Benefits (San Antonio/Mailstation E1L) on or before December 3, 2010.  If your form is not timely submitted, you will not be eligible to participate in the Plan for the 2011 Plan Year.
 
The Company has taken measures to design the Plan in a manner that conforms to current tax law.  However, it is possible that new legislation could affect your deferral elections.  Your 2011 Plan Year deferral elections are irrevocable and are governed by the terms and conditions of the Plan as well as any modifications made to the Plan in order to conform to legal requirements.
 
ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:
I hereby authorize the above amounts to be deducted and deferred through payroll deduction/reduction by the Company.
			
	 
	 
	 

	Participant's Signature
	 
	Date

	 
	 
	 

	«First_name» «Last_name»
	 
	«Emplid»

	Participant's Name
	 
	Participant's Employee ID Number
No. 11-6781.

#### Brett Arthur Anderson, Petitioner v. Mark Lund, Superintendent, Clarinda Correctional Facility.

565 U.S. 1096, 132 S. Ct. 849,

181 L. Ed. 2d 548,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8945.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
No. 09-9287.

#### Tyrone Lorenzo Robinson, Petitioner v. LeVern Cohen, Warden, et al.

559 U.S. 1096, 130 S. Ct. 2380,

176 L. Ed. 2d 775,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3541.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina denied.