alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit31.1**

 

I, Gerard M. Banmiller, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of 1st Colonial Bancorp, Inc.; 

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of 1st ColonialBancorp as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.               1st ColonialBancorp’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for 1st Colonial Bancorp and have:

 

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto 1st Colonial Bancorp, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis quarterly report is being prepared.

 

(b)         Evaluated theeffectiveness of 1st Colonial Bancorp’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of September 30, 2003, based onsuch evaluation; and

 

(c)          Disclosed in thisquarterly report any change in 1st Colonial Bancorp’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30,2003 that has

 

----

 

materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, 1st Colonial’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5.               1st ColonialBancorp’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to 1stColonial Bancorp’s auditors and the audit committee of 1st Colonial Bancorp’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)          All significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect 1st ColonialBancorp’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

(b)         Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in 1st Colonial Bancorp’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date  November 13, 2003

 

 
|   | /s/  Gerard M. Banmiller |   |
|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   | Gerard M. Banmiller           |
|   | President and                 |
|   | Chief Executive Officer       |

 

----
Amended & Restated Secured Promissory Note



 Exhibit 10.5 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE 

 

					
	 $70,000,000.00
	  	 
  
	Santa Ana, California

December 31, 2010
	  
   



This AMENDED AND RESTATED SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE amends and restates that certain SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE dated as of June 1, 2010
made by Payor (as defined below) in favor of Payee (as defined below). 
 FIRST AMERICAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “Payor”) hereby promises to pay to the order of First American Title Insurance Company, a California corporation (the “Payee”), in lawful money of the United
States of America, by bank check or wire transfer, at 1 First American Way, Santa Ana, CA 92707, the principal sum of SEVENTY MILLION DOLLARS ($70,000,000.00), together with interest thereon at a rate of three and twenty-nine hundredths percent
(3.29%) per annum, payable on December 31, 2011. 
 Upon the commencement of any bankruptcy, reorganization,
arrangement, adjustment of debt, relief of debtors, dissolution, insolvency or liquidation or similar proceeding or any jurisdiction relating to the Payor, the unpaid principal amount hereof, together with any unpaid interest, shall become
immediately due and payable without presentment, demand, protest or notice of any kind in connection with this Note. 
 This
Note may be voluntarily repaid by the Payor prior to maturity, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty. The Payor hereby waives presentment, demand, protest or notice of any kind in connection with this Note. 

This Note is delivered by Payor in satisfaction in the principal amount of this Note of intercompany balances (whether characterized on
the books and records of Payor and Payee as advances or otherwise) owed by Payor to Payee. This Note is secured by the security pledged by Payor to Payee under that certain Amended and Restated Pledge Agreement dated December 31, 2008 between
Payor and Payee, as such agreement may be amended from time to time. 
 THIS NOTE SHALL BE CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AND
GOVERNED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 
  

			
	FIRST AMERICAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ Max O. Valdes
		 	 Name: Max O. Valdes

		 	 Title: Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-8925.

#### Richard Paul Zuckerman, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1004, 130 S. Ct. 1936,

176 L. Ed. 2d 361,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2638.

March 22, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until April 12, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
No. 09-10719 (09A1089).

#### Michael Francis Beuke, Petitioner v. Ted Strickland, Governor of Ohio, et al.

559 U.S. 1118, 130 S. Ct. 3272,

176 L. Ed. 2d 945,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3875.

May 12, 2010.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented *946to Justice Stevens, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 604 F.3d 939.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. 1350) The undersigned, Michael J. Cunningham, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Aeropostale, Inc. (the Company) has executed this
certificated in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended October 30, 2004 (the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act); and 2. The information contained the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of
the 3rd day of December, 2004. /s/     MICHAEL J. CUNNINGHAMMichael J. CunninghamExecutive Vice President - Chief
Financial Officer This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 24
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, James V. Mazzo, the Chief Executive Officer of Advanced Medical Optics,Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereby certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterended June 25, 2004 of Advanced Medical Optics, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financialinformation included in this report fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s second fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 2, 2004    /s/ JAMES V. MAZZO  James V. Mazzo, President and Chief Executive Officer
**A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has beenprovided to Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. and will be retained by AdvancedMedical Optics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.**
IN RE: K.N.

110A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 28, 2019

Jeffrey William Gillette, Attorney at Law, Franklin, For Johnson, Michael

Erica M. Hicks, Attorney at Law, For Guilford County DHHS

Mercedes O. Chut, Attorney at Law

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of March 2019 by Respondent (Father) for Extension of Time to Serve Record on Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of March 2019."

Respondent (Father) shall have up to and including the 12th day of April 2019 to serve his/her proposed record.
Obligations

% Total 

Obligations Fixed Price Cost T&M/LH Other Competed

Not 

Competed Q1 Q2 

 Special Interest FunctionsR406 POLICY REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES $107,000 4% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 100% 

R425 ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES $130,000 4% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% R699 OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES $1,476,156 49% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% S113 TELEPHONE AND-OR COMMUNICATIONS SER $301,127 10% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 42% R418 LEGAL SERVICES $143,325 5% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% V213 RAIL PASSENGER SERVICES $140,000 5% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100% R425 ENGINEERNG & TECHNICAL SERVICESR406 POLICY REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICESR704 AUDITING SERVICES $83,098 3% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% V302 TRAVEL AGENT SERVICES $56,244 2% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% R701 ADVERTISING SERVICES $35,000 1% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% R499 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $30,000 1% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 

see abovesee above

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB): Service Contract Inventory Summary Report

Contract Type Analysis Competition Analysis Time of O

(as % of PSC obligations) (as % of PSC obligations (as % of 

Biggest Percentage of Obligations
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly report of Zaldiva, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB-A1 for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), We,
Robert B. Lees, President, and John A. Palmer, Jr., Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



 /s/ Robert B. Lees
-------------------
President
10/10/03

 /s/ John A. Palmer, Jr.
-----------------------
Treasurer
Director
10/10/03
No. 09-9963.

#### Lennell Dyches, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1114, 130 S. Ct. 2424,

176 L. Ed. 2d 938,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3721.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 333 Fed. Appx. 707.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 1701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-420]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial 
Research Special Emphasis Panel; Review of R03 and R21 applications.
    Date: February 11, 2009.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Jonathan Horsford, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Natl. Inst. of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National 
Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd, Room 664, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-594-4859. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f59d9a8786939a879fb598949c99db9b9c9ddb929a83"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="caa2a5b8b9aca5b8a08aa7aba3a6e4a4a3a2e4ada5bc">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 6, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-420 Filed 1-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

828 

KA 12-00501 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, FAHEY, AND PERADOTTO, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CHRISTOPHER J. FEIDNER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

KELIANN M. ARGY-ELNISKI, ORCHARD PARK, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (WILLIAM G. ZICKL OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C.

Noonan, J.), rendered December 22, 2011. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the

second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is 

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him

upon his plea of guilty of attempted burglary in the second degree

(Penal Law §§ 110.00, 140.25 [2]). Defendant’s contention that he was

denied effective assistance of counsel does not survive his guilty

plea because “[t]here is no showing that the plea bargaining process

was infected by [the] allegedly ineffective assistance or that

defendant entered the plea because of his attorney[’s] allegedly poor

performance” (People v Robinson, 39 AD3d 1266, 1267, lv denied 9 NY3d

869 [internal quotation marks omitted]). Even assuming, arguendo,

that defendant purported to preserve for appellate review his

challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence, we would not

entertain that challenge on this appeal from the judgment entered upon

his guilty plea; indeed, “it would be logically inconsistent to permit

a defendant to enter a plea of guilty based on particular admitted

facts, yet to allow that defendant contemporaneously to reserve the

right to challenge on appeal the sufficiency of those facts to support

a conviction, had there been a trial” (People v Plunkett, 19 NY3d 400,

405-406). Moreover, we agree with the People that defendant’s

challenge to the weight of the evidence is “inapplicable” inasmuch as

he was convicted upon his plea of guilty, rather than upon a verdict

following a trial (cf. People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349). Finally,

the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: September 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
### HUNTSMAN CORPORATION HUNGARY

ANALYTICAL LABORATORY

GC-MS REPORT

SANITIZED
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 44 (Monday, March 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4866]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11675 and <greek-i>11676]


 Oklahoma Disaster <greek-i>OK-00030

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Oklahoma (FEMA-
1820-DR), dated 02/25/2009.
    Incident: Severe storms and tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 02/10/2009 through 02/11/2009.
    Effective Date: 02/25/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/27/2009.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/25/2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 02/25/2009, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Carter, Coal, Love.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit             4.500
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11675B 
and for economic injury is 11676B.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-4866 Filed 3-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
No. 09-9862.

#### Montgomery Carl Akers, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the District of Colorado.

559 U.S. 1112, 130 S. Ct. 2429,

176 L. Ed. 2d 934,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3787.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.