alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 149 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46069-46070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18828]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION

Proposed Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, 
Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by the 
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection

AGENCY: Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.

ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces the availability of the Bureau of 
Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau or CFPB's) guidelines to ensure 
and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of 
information disseminated by the Bureau. These guidelines also detail 
the administrative mechanisms developed by the Bureau to allow affected 
persons to seek and obtain appropriate correction of information 
maintained and disseminated by the Bureau that does not comply with the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) or the Bureau guidelines. This 
notice also provides an opportunity for public comment on the Bureau's 
guidelines.

DATES: To be considered, comments must be received by September 4, 
2012.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by the title of this 
notice, by any of the following methods:
     Electronic: CFPB_IQ_Submissions@cfpb.gov.
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Monica Jackson, Consumer 
Financial Protection Bureau, 1700 G Street NW., Washington, DC 20552.
    Comments will be available for public inspection and copying at 
1700 G Street NW., Washington, DC 20552, on official business days 
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time. You can make an 
appointment to inspect the documents by telephoning (202) 435-7275. All 
comments, including attachments and other supporting materials, will 
become part of the public

[[Page 46070]]

record and subject to public disclosure. Sensitive personal 
information, such as account numbers or social security numbers, should 
not be included. Comments will not be edited to remove any identifying 
or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information 
should be directed to Christopher Willey, Chief Information Officer, 
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, (202) 435-7741.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice and the Bureau's guidelines are 
required by section 515 of the Treasury and General Government 
Appropriations Act for FY 2001 (Pub. L. 106-554) and the OMB Guidelines 
published on January 3, 2002, at 67 FR 369-378 (reprinted February 5, 
2002, at 67 FR 5365). The Bureau's draft report is available for public 
inspection at the Bureau's Web site, www.consumerfinance.gov.

    Dated: July 19, 2012.
Richard Cordray,
Director, Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.
[FR Doc. 2012-18828 Filed 8-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AM-P
```
No. 09-10007.

#### Nyron Joel Nichols, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1116, 130 S. Ct. 2418,

176 L. Ed. 2d 940,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3686.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 358 Fed. Appx. 410.
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
WASHINGTON, DC 20511

Mr. Steven Aftergood

Federation of American Scientists

1725 DeSales Street, NW, Suite 600

Washington, DC 20036 0cT 28 2010

Reference: DF-2009-00042
Dear Mr. Aftergood:

This responds to your 24 March 2009 letter addressed to the Office of the Director of
National Intelligence wherein you requested, under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), “a
copy of the documents that indicate the total budget appropriation for the National
Intelligence Program for Fiscal Year 2006.”

Your request was processed in accordance with the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, as amended.
Upon review, it was determined that your request may be granted in full. The aggregate amount
appropriated to the NIP for fiscal year 2006 was $40.9 Billion.

If you have any questions, please call the Requester Service Center at (703) 275-3642.

Sincerely,

Wk co

hn F. Hackett
irector, Information Management Office
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cortelco Systems Puerto Rico, Inc. ("Small business issuer") for the Three Months ended October 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Juan Carlos Ramos, Chief Executive Officer, and Francisco Sanchez, Chief Financial Officer of small business issuer, hereby certify, that:



1.

The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of small business issuer.











Date: December 15, 2008

/s/   Juan Carlos RamosJuan Carlos Ramos
Chief Executive Officer









/s/   Francisco SanchezFrancisco Sanchez
Chief Financial Officer





18



---
No. 09-9114.

#### Craig Allan Williams, Petitioner v. Ricardo Martinez, Warden, et al.

559 U.S. 1042, 130 S. Ct. 2073,

176 L. Ed. 2d 423,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2833.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 388 U.S. App. D.C. 316, 586 F.3d 995.
Exhibit 10.45



 Exhibit 10.45 
 2011 Director Fees 
 For 2011, our non-employee directors will
receive the following annual Board fees. These fees are paid on a calendar-year basis, quarterly in advance. No separate meeting attendance fees are paid for attending meetings of Board committees. 

 

					
	 Board Retainer
	  	$	150,000	(1) 
	 Committee Chair Retainer:
	  			
	 Audit Committee
	  	$	25,000	  
	 Compensation Committee
	  	$	15,000	  
	 Fee for Serving on Audit Committee (other than the Committee Chair)
	  	$	10,000	  
	 Lead Director Fee
	  	$	50,000	  
	 Non-Executive Chair of the Board Fee
	  	$	100,000	  

  

	(1)	For 2011, the annual Board retainer is being paid 50% in cash and 50% in the form of a grant of 11,980 restricted stock units to each of our non-employee directors. The
grant was made on January 4, 2011 under our 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended. The restricted stock units represent the right to receive an equivalent number of shares of our common stock and have a value of $75,000 based on the closing
price of our common stock on January 4, 2011 of $6.26 per share. The restricted stock units vest in four equal quarterly installments on January 4, 2011, April 1, 2011, July 1, 2011 and October 1, 2011, subject to
continued service as a director on the applicable vesting date. For Mses. Glyn F. Aeppel and Lynn Krominga, vested shares will be delivered within three days after December 31, 2011 or, if earlier, the date they cease to be directors. For
Messrs. Thomas J. Donohue, Stephen D. Harlan, Paul J. Klaassen and William G. Little, who each elected to defer delivery of their vested shares, vested shares will be delivered within three days after they cease to be directors, if later than
December 31, 2011. Vesting of the restricted stock units will accelerate upon consummation of a “Change of Control”, as defined in our 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended. 


In addition, all non-employee directors will be reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board or Board
committees. 
 Mark S. Ordan, our chief executive officer, does not receive fees for serving on our Board.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6962

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. STEVEN RAY JOHNSON, a/k/a Quick, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:96-cr-00157-H-8)

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 15, 2009

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Ray Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Steven Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Johnson , No. 5:96-cr-00157-H-8 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2017253EN.01000102.xml

| 4.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8538 — IFM/OHL/OHL Mexico)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 253/02)

On 11 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8538. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8538. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
No. 09-8780.

#### Oscar Castillo-Ramirez, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 986, 130 S. Ct. 1723,

176 L. Ed. 2d 203,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1998.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 334 Fed. Appx. 855.
SECOND
                         LETTER OF EXTENSION
                 DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT DATED 9/17/91
                   AS EXTENDED ON SEPTEMBER 2, 1998

1.   The term of the Distribution Agreement dated September 17,
     1991, by and between Codman and Shurtleff, Inc. and Valley
     Forge Scientific Corp. as set forth in Paragraph 16 of that
     Agreement and as extended in the "Letter of Extension"dated
     September 2, 1998 is hereby extended until December 31, 2000.

2.   Distributor's minimum purchases of Established Products for
     calendar year 1999 are reduced from five million ($5,000,000)
     to three and a half million ($3,500,000).  The minimum
     purchases of Established Products for calendar year 2000 will
     also be three and a half million ($3,500,000).

3.   Distributor shall make such purchases of New Products during
     the remaining term as mutually agreed upon by Valley Forge
     Scientific Corp. and Distributor.

4.   Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning
     ascribed to them in the Distribution Agreement.

5.   All other terms of the Distribution Agreement shall remain in
     full force and effect.

6.   This second Letter of Extension supercedes the Letter of
     Extension dated September 2, 1998.


Dated: 11/2/99                          Codman & Shurtleff, Inc.


                              By:   /s/ Codman & Shurtleff, Inc.

Dated: 11/2/99                          Valley Forge Scientific Corp.


                              By:  /s/ Valley Forge Scientific Corp.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Countryside Review Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Lisa Zumpano, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 13th day of November, 2003.



| | /s/ Lisa Zumpano
Lisa Zumpano
Chief Financial Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------









---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 506 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 506

                For the relief of Christine L. Barrott.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2005

Mr. Miller of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Christine L. Barrott.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The limitations set forth in sections 6511 and 
6514(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limitations 
on credit or refund and credits or refunds after period of limitation ) 
shall not apply to a claim filed by Christine L. Barrott of Milton, 
Florida, for credit or refund of overpayments of the individual Federal 
income tax Christine L. Barrott paid for the taxable years 1990 through 
1999.
    (b) Deadline.--Subsection (a) shall apply only if Christine L. 
Barrott submits a claim pursuant to such subsection within the 1-year 
period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zaldiva, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), we, Nicole Leigh van Coller, President, and Christopher R. Ebersole, CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Dated: 5/16/2007                       /s/Nicole Leigh van Coller ----------                       -------------------------- Nicole Leigh van Coller President  Dated: 5/16/2007                       /s/Christopher R. Ebersole ----------                       -------------------------- Christopher R. Ebersole CFO
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 23, 2015

Order 

September 23, 2015

151655(34)

REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellee,

v

ESTATE OF OSCAR L. BATCHELOR,

TERRENCE CRAWFORD, YVETTE 

CRAWFORD, and all other occupants,

Defendants-Appellants.

SC: 151655

COA: 322927

Wayne CC: 13-001662-AV

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Estate of Oscar L. Batchelor to 

substitute for defendant-appellant Oscar L. Batchelor, deceased, pursuant to MCR 

2.202(A)(1) is GRANTED.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Pu Yue, the Vice
Chairman of CHINA BROADBAND, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY
that:





1.      The
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.      Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this statement this 15 day of April, 2010.





/s/ Pu YuePu
      YueVice
      Chairman(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Broadband, Inc. and will be retained by China Broadband, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
#### Ebenezer Mar Thoma Church et al., Appellants, v Thomas C. Alexander et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

[719 NYS2d 297]

In an action, *inter alia,*to enjoin the individual defendants from performing certain church-related activities, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), dated June 4, 1999, which, after a nonjury trial, *inter alia,*enjoined the individual plaintiffs from using or operating under the names Ebenezer Mar Thoma Church and Ebenezer Mar Thoma Church, New York, and dismissed the complaint.

*549Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that a decision rendered by a court after a nonjury trial should not be disturbed on appeal unless it is clear that its conclusions could not have been reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence *(see, Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc, v Town of Bedford,*60 NY2d 492, 499; *Bucci v Bucci,*231 AD2d 665; *Richard’s Home Ctr. & Lbr. v Kraft,*199 AD2d 254; *Universal Leasing Servs. v Flushing Hae Kwan Rest.,*169 AD2d 829, 830).

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contentions, the record supports the Supreme Court’s finding that the Mar Thoma Church, which is the parent church of the Ebenezer Mar Thoma Church, New York, is hierarchical in nature. Accordingly, the issues of whether the individual plaintiffs are members in good standing within the church and who, among the parties, represents the true Ebenezer Mar Thoma Church, both of which have been decided in the respondents’ favor by the church’s highest authorities, are not reviewable by a secular court of law *(see, Serbian E. Orthodox Diocese v Milivojevich,*426 US 696, 724-725; *Watson v Jones,*80 US 679; *First Presbyt. Church v United Presbyt. Church,*62 NY2d 110,119, *cert denied*469 US 1037; *Matter of Kissel v Russian Orthodox Greek Catholic Holy Trinity Church,*103 AD2d 830).

Therefore, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint, enjoined the plaintiffs from using the names Ebenezer Mar Thoma Church and Ebenezer Mar Thoma Church, New York, and barred the plaintiffs from using the church’s tax identification number or property. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
10.1

    


    Summary
of Base Salaries

    for

    Executive Officers of Park
National Corporation

    


    On
February 8, 2011, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Park
National Corporation (“Park”) approved the base salaries for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2011, for each of the executive officers of
Park:  (a) C. Daniel DeLawder, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of Park and The Park National Bank, a subsidiary of Park;
(b) David L. Trautman, President and Secretary of Park and President of The
Park National Bank; and (c) John W. Kozak, Chief Financial Officer of Park
and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The Park National
Bank.  Those
base salaries are:

     

    * C. Daniel DeLawder
— $773,525

     

    * David L. Trautman —
$563,250

     

    * John W. Kozak —
$414,455
<PAGE>


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  Gordon  F.  Burley,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  on  Form 10-QSB of Merritt Ventures Corp. for the quarterly period ended
September  30,  2002  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects
the  financial  condition  and  results  of operations of Merritt Ventures Corp.


                             By:  /s/ Gordon  F.  Burley
                                      ---------------------
                             Name:    Gordon  F.  Burley

                             Title:   CHIEF  FINANCIAL  OFFICER

                             Date:     November  22,  2002




<PAGE>


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Lorrie Ann Archibald, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  on  Form 10-QSB of Merritt Ventures Corp. for the quarterly period ended
September  30,  2002  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects
the  financial  condition  and  results  of operations of Merritt Ventures Corp.


                             By:  /s/ Lorrie Ann Archibald
                                      ---------------------
                             Name:    Lorrie Ann Archibald

                             Title:   PRESIDENT AND CHIEF  EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                             Date:    November  22,  2002