alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10(t)(v)

 

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE WESTINGHOUSE EXECUTIVE PENSION PLAN

PART B – AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT AS OF JANUARY 1, 2009 (THE “PLAN”)

 

Except as otherwise noted herein, the following amendments shall be effective as of January 1, 2009.

 

	
1.
    	
Section 2(e) of the Plan is hereby amended   to delete such section in its entirety and to insert in place thereof the following:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
“(e)      ‘Benefit Commencement Date’ means the   first day of the month immediately following the later of (i) the Executive’s   Separation from Service, and (ii) the Executive’s attainment of age 55,   subject to any Transition Election or Subsequent Payment Election made by the   Executive.”
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
2.
    	
Section 2(oo) of the Plan is hereby   amended to capitalize the phrase “Executive Pension Supplement” at the end   thereof.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
3.
    	
Section 2(vv) of the Plan is hereby   amended to delete the phrase “Executive Pension Supplement” and to insert in   place thereof the phrase “Post-2004 Plan Benefit”.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
4.
    	
Sections 4(c)(ii) and 5(c)(ii) of the Plan   are hereby amended to add the word “Section” immediately before the phrase   “409A Grandfathered Benefit” in the last sentence thereof.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
5.
    	
Section 5(c) of the Plan is hereby amended   to delete the word “Executive” in the first sentence and to insert in place   thereof the phrase “Surviving Spouse”.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
6.
    	
Section 5(c)(i) of the Plan is hereby   amended to delete the phrase “Post-2004 Benefit” in the last sentence and to   insert in place thereof the phrase “Post-2004 Plan Benefit”.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
7.
    	
Section 7(a)(ii) of the Plan is hereby   amended to delete the phrase “payment of his Plan Benefit prior to January 1,   2009” in the first and second sentences and to insert in place thereof the   phrase “payment of his Executive Pension Supplement prior to January 1,   2009”.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
8.
    	
Section 7(c) of the Plan is hereby amended   to delete the phrase “Equivalent Actuarially value” in the first paragraph   and to insert in place thereof the phrase “Equivalent Actuarial Value”.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
9.
    	
Sections 7(d), 7(f) and 11(b) of the Plan   are hereby amended to delete the phrase “Equivalent Actuarial value” and to   insert in place thereof the phrase “Equivalent Actuarial Value”.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.9



                Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Patriot Scientific
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended May 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lowell
W. Giffhorn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

        3)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        4)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.



                                                  /S/ LOWELL W. GIFFHORN
                                                  ----------------------------
                                                  Name: Lowell W. Giffhorn
                                                  Title: Exec. V.P. and CFO
                                                  Date: August 26, 2002
**Exhibit
      23.2**








CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM










We
      have
      issued our report dated September 6, 2006 on the consolidated balance sheet
      of
      AHPC Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiary as of June 30, 2006 and the related
      consolidated statement of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash
      flows of AHPC Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiary for the year ended June 30, 2006,
      included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006,
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We hereby consent to the
      incorporation by reference of our report in the company’s previously filed
      Registration Statement Nos. 333-28003 and 333-81411.








/s/
      Plante & Moran, PLLC




Chicago,
      Illinois


September
      13, 2006
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5045 

To amend the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 to allow community 

reinvestment credit for investments and other financial support to enable 

veterans to purchase residential homes or to assist organizations with 

the establishment of housing opportunities and assisted living facilities 

for veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2006 

Mr. LYNCH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 to 

allow community reinvestment credit for investments and 

other financial support to enable veterans to purchase 

residential homes or to assist organizations with the establishment of housing opportunities and assisted living 

facilities for veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘A Home for the Brave 

5 Act’’. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5045 IH 

1 SEC. 2. COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT CREDITS FOR CER2 TAIN SUPPORT FOR VETERANS. 

3 Section 804 of the Community Reinvestment Act of 

4 1977 (12 U.S.C. 2903) is amended by adding at the end 

5 the following new subsection: 

6 ‘‘(d) HOMES FOR VETERANS.—In assessing and tak7 ing into account, under subsection (a), the record of a fi8 nancial institution, the appropriate Federal financial su9 pervisory agency shall consider, as a factor, capital invest10 ments, low interest loans, loan participation, technical as11 sistance, and grants by the institution to support or en12 able— 

13 ‘‘(1) any veteran (as such term is defined in 

14 section 101 of title 38, United States Code) to pur15 chase a home for use as the principal residence of 

16 the veteran; and 

17 ‘‘(2) any entity that is establishing housing op18 portunities or assisted living facilities for veterans to 

19 carry out such activities.’’. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Richard A. Meier, the Chief Financial Officer of Advanced Medical Optics,Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereby certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterended June 25, 2004 of Advanced Medical Optics, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financialinformation included in this report fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s second fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 2, 2004    /s/ RICHARD A. MEIER  Richard A. Meier, Executive Vice President of Operationsand Finance, and Chief Financial Officer
**A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has beenprovided to Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. and will be retained by AdvancedMedical Optics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.**
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Mary Jane Robertson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       Date: May 3, 2007 By: /s/ *Mary Jane Robertson*     Mary Jane Robertson
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Hamish Malkin, Chief Financial Officer of Argentex Mining Corporation (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Argentex Mining Corporation for the interim period ended April 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Argentex Mining Corporation

Dated:  June 14, 2007

 

/s/ Hamish Malkin                                                          

Hamish Malkin

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and 

Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Argentex Mining Corporation and will be retained by Argentex Mining Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 09-9137.

#### Keith Robert Caldwell, Sr., Petitioner v. United States Tax Court, et al.

559 U.S. 1091, 130 S. Ct. 2397,

176 L. Ed. 2d 766,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3639.

April 26, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
No. 09-8809.

#### Troy Warren, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 986, 130 S. Ct. 1726,

176 L. Ed. 2d 204,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1961.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

*205Same case below, 340 Fed. Appx. 948.
No. 09-9132.

#### Tarone D. Johnson, Petitioner v. South Carolina, et al.

559 U.S. 1076, 130 S. Ct. 2108,

176 L. Ed. 2d 736,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3461.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

*737Same case below, 332 Fed. Appx. 842.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that th i s

opinion s h ould not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit



## FILED

May 16, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-20504

Summary Calendar

TUNDE HARRY WILLIAMS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

ROBERT MASON, Officer in Charge, HIPOLITO ACOSTA,

District Director, Immigration Naturalization Service;

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL;

ANY OTHER PERSON HAVING PLAINTIFF IN CUSTODY,

Respondents-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:04-CV-1877

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Tunde Harry Williams appeals the district court’s

dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In his petition, Williams argued that the INS

deprived him of his right to Fifth Amendment due p rocess by not

reopening his removal proceeding so that he could pursue adjustment

of status under the Legal Immigration and Family Equity (LIFE) Act,2

8 U.S.C. § 1255(i). He challenged the decisions of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen his removal

proceeding and also denying his motion to reconsider the BIA’s

denial of his motion to reopen. Finding no error, we AFFIRM.

The district court correctly concluded that it lacked

jurisdiction for three reasons. First, Williams seeks review of

the Attorney General’s decision to execute a removal order, review

of which is precluded under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g). S ee Cardoso v.

Reno

, 216 F.3d 512, 516-17 (5th Cir. 1999). Second, because

Williams’s motion to reopen his case was filed untimely, he failed

to exhaust his administrative remedies, which p recluded the

district court from exercising jurisdiction over his claims. See

Enriquez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 246, 248 (5th Cir. 2004).

Finally, because no legal standar d exists against which to judge

the BIA’s decision not to exercise its sua sponte authority to

reopen Williams’s remova l proceeding and not to reconsider that

decision, the district court lacked juris diction to review the

BIA’s discretionary decisions. See id. at 250; see also Bravo v.

Ashcroft

, 341 F.3d 590, 592 (5th Cir. 2003) (“Although federal

courts retain habeas jurisdicti on to review statutory and

constitutional claims, there is no jurisdiction to review denials

of discretionary relief.”).

The district court also denied Williams’s alternative

request for a transfer of his case to this court for direct review

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. For the reasons set forth above,3

transfer of this action by the district court would not have been

proper because this case could not have been brought in this court

at the time that it was filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

Accordi ngly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED

.
# C_2017279EN.01000101.xml

| 23.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7873 — Worldline/Equens/Paysquare)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 279/01)

On 20 April 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7873. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7873. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Terra Nostra Resources Corp., (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sun Liu James Po, Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  January 22, 2008

By:  /s/ Sun Liu James Po

Name:  Sun Liu James Po

Title:    Principal Executive Officer
An equal opportunity employer

1220 L Street, Northwest Russell White

Washington, DC 20005-4070 Health Sciences Manager

Tel 202-682-8344

Fax 202-682-8270

whiter@api.org

June 21, 2013

Byron J. Bunker,

Division Director

Compliance Division

Office of Transportation and Air Quality 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

2000 Traverwood Drive 

Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105

RE: CAA Section 211(b) Fuels and Fuel Additives Health Effects Testing Regulation: 

Final Submission for 211(b) (Docket No. A-90-07)

Final Report Gasoline DIPE Vapor Condensate: A 13-Week Whole-Body Inhalation 

Toxicity Study in Rats with Neurotoxicity Assessments and 4-Week In Vivo 

Genotoxicity and Immunotoxicity Assessments (HLS Study No. 00-6130)

Dear Mr. Bunker:

The American Petroleum Institute (API), on behalf of the Section 211(b) Research Group (RG), 

is submitting the following information to EPA as partial fulfillment of the CAA Section 211(b) 

Alternative Tier 2 requirements of the testing regulation:

 Final Report Gasoline DIPE Vapor Condensate: A 13-Week Whole-Body 

Inhalation Toxicity Study in Rats with Neurotoxicity Assessments and 4-Week 

In Vivo Genotoxicity and Immunotoxicity Assessments (HLS Study No. 00-

6130)

This report has undergone review by two independent peer-reviewers, outside QA/QC, the 

211(b) Technical Workgroup, and EPA (Hauchman to Grundler Memorandum, November 15, 

2012). Therefore the final report is being submitted to you at the EPA Office of Transportation 

and Air Quality, Transportation and Regional Programs Division, as part of the requirements of 

Clean Air Act Section 211(b)(2) and 211(e) (Docket No. A-90-07). If you require further 

information or have any questions regarding this submission, please contact me.

Regards,

Russell D. White

Encl (1): Final Report Gasoline DIPE Vapor Condensate: A 13-Week Whole-Body Inhalation 

Toxicity Study in Rats with Neurotoxicity Assessments and 4-Week In Vivo Genotoxicity and 

Immunotoxicity Assessments (HLS Study No. 00-6130)

Cc: Joe Sopata, EPA (via email)
No. 09-8548.

#### Darryl L. Brown, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1031, 130 S. Ct. 1889,

176 L. Ed. 2d 404,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2363.

March 22, 2010.

Motion of petitioner to seal the petition for a writ of certiorari denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of XRG, Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending  June 30,  2002 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on August 13, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Stephen Couture, Chief
Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Stephen Couture
-------------------------
Stephen Couture
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2002