alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Pu Yue, Principal Accounting
Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934; and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Broadband, Inc.
(f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and will be retained by China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a
Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.




April
      15, 2009
            
            
            /s/ Pu
      YuePuYue (Principal Accounting and
      Financial Officer)
#### Gussie TURNER, Appellant, v. CROWLEY’S RIDGE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL, INCORPORATED, Appellee.

No. 90-1267.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 10, 1990.

Decided Nov. 14, 1990.

*80P.A. Hollingsworth of Little Rock, Ark., for appellant.

Todd Williams of Jonesboro, Ark., for appellee.

Before BOWMAN, Circuit Judge, FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit • Judge, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

Gussie Turner appeals from the dismissal of her complaint alleging racial discrimination in the terms of her employment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, *et seq.*We affirm.

Turner directed the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Program (ADAP), a program at Crowley’s Ridge Development Council, Inc. (CRDC) from 1977 until 1985. CRDC discharged Turner, a black female, for inadequate performance of her managerial duties. These deficiencies caused significant financial problems for ADAP, with losses estimated at $40,000.

The district court1 correctly applied the principles announced in *McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green,*411 U.S. 792, 802, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 1824, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973), to evaluate Turner’s asserted prima facie ease. The district court found that Turner had failed to establish that she was fully qualified for the position from which she was dismissed. The district court then went on to find that, assuming that Turner had established a prima facie case, her employer had legitimate, non-pretextual reasons for discharging her. Our review of the record satisfies us that the district court’s findings are not clearly erroneous and that it did not err in dismissing Turner’s complaint.

The district court’s judgment is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable Stephen M. Reasoner, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
83/27/2012 15:03 9072712800 FAA 

### FEDERAL AVIATION AOMINISTRA TION Alaskan Region Office ofthe Regional Counsel 222 West Seventh Avenue, Box 14 Anchorage, Alaska 99513 PH: (907) 271-5269 FAX: (907) 271-2800 

# FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET TO: llearing DocketClerk
FAX

### No: (202) 493-5020 

### FROM: Glenn H. Brown, Esq.
RE: Ice Cold, INc. FAA

### DocketNo. 2011-AWA-CPP-02588 

### FDMS No. FAA-2011-1288



### Number ofpages (not**includin~** 

### this cover sheet): - 2 - Complainant's Withdrawal OfMotions PAGE 01/0303/27/2012 15:03 9072712800 FAA

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.
IN THE MATTER Of ICE COJ,D, INC. FAA DOCKETNO. 2011-AWA-CPP-02588 (Civil**P~nalty** Proceeding) l'DMS NO, FAA-2011·1288

COMPLAlNANT'S WITHDRAWAL OF MOTIONS PAGE 02/03

By motions**~erved** on March 20,2012, Complainant moved for orders deeming certain requests for admission admitted and compeU\ng Respondent to respond to certain other discovery requests. Complainant has now learned thatthe copy ofthe discovery request served on Respondent on January 27, 2012, did not include the first two pages. Complainant's motions are, therefore, premature, and Complainant hereby withdraws them. 1**R~spcctfully** submitted this 28111 day ofMarch 2012. HOWARD L. MARTIN, JR. Regional Counsel By:

# .:JL.':-:!"-' 

# (h--"'-- Gienn 

### H. BroW11. Senior Attorney

1 The two missing pages were haTided to Respondent's president on March 26.201.2.03/27/2012 15:03 9072712800 FAA



### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Re; Ice Cold. lnc. FAA Docket No. 2011-AWA-CPP-02588 FDMS NO. FAA-2011-1288 PAGE 03/03

I hereby certify that on thisdate I have served a copy ofthe 

### COMPLAINANT'S . WITHDM WAL OF·MOTJONS by postage-prepaid. certified mall, return receipt requested, to the following:**Th~** Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

### ot11ce ofHeadngs, M-20; U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 

### Jim Wolgemuth, President Ice Cold. Inc., Respondent 2020 Belmont Drive Anchorage. 

### AK 99517 1further certify tllat on this date l ha.ve served the original and one copy ofthe 

### COMPLAINANT'S WJTHDRA

### WAL OF MOTIONS 

### by postage-prepaid, certi.fied mail, retum ,·eceipt requested and facsimile, addressed as follows: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington. DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 000 DATED: 

# -?'?-G· .,2':{ 

## ..:20 / :.:2_ /).....L ' ' /7,/ . ) 

# /(dLf-£./tc.cr 

# d;.x**L'J-1:~~-<?.I·-** t·ederal Avta!ton Adm'tmstratton / · /, Office ofRegional Counsel 

## rl t 222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14, AAL-7 Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7587

2
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mesaba Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended
March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 12(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                     |  |     |                                                                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: June 27, 2003 |  | By: | /s/ROBERT E. WEILRobert E. Weil Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                 CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  the undersigned  officer of ING USA Annuity and
Life Insurance  Company (the "Company")  hereby certifies that, to the officer's
knowledge,  the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2003 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13 or
15(d),  as  applicable,  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  and that the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


March 25, 2004                  By    /s/ David A. Wheat
---------------                       ------------------------------------------
    (Date)                                David A. Wheat
                                          Director, Senior Vice President and
                                          Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-8458.

#### Allan Elias, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1059, 130 S. Ct. 2369,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3057.

176 L. Ed. 2d 580,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 957, 130 S. Ct. 1553, 176 L. Ed. 2d 143, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 1223.
No. 09-9616.

#### Teresa Aguilar, Petitioner v. Selman Breitzman, LLP, et al.

559 U.S. 1098, 130 S. Ct. 2386,

176 L. Ed. 2d 779,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3603,

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4786

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 535 Wood Street in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 

as the ‘‘H. Gordon Payrow Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2

•HR 4786 EH 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 535 Wood Street in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘H. Gordon Payrow 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘H. Gordon Payrow Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 28, 

2006. 

Attest:

Clerk. 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4786

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. lehem, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘H. Gordon Payrow al Service located at 535 Wood Street in Beth-
No. 09-826.

#### David K. Stone, et al., Petitioners v. Devon Energy Production Company, L.P., et al.

559 U.S. 1068, 130 S. Ct. 2096,

176 L. Ed. 2d 724,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3367.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Wyoming denied.

Same case below, 216 P.3d 489.
No. 09-9459.

#### Carolyn E. O’Connor, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1047, 130 S. Ct. 2360,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3092.

176 L. Ed. 2d 560,

April 5, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
No. 09-8393.

#### Clarence Randle, Jr., Petitioner v. California.

559 U.S. 1089, 130 S. Ct. 2146,

176 L. Ed. 2d 763,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3168.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 995, 130 S. Ct. 1743, 176 L. Ed. 2d 217, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 2256.
Third Amendment to the Profit Participation Plan of Moody's Corporation.



 Exhibit 10.43 
 THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE PROFIT PARTICIPATION PLAN OF MOODY’S CORPORATION 
 Section 12.8 of the
Moody’s Corporation Profit Participation Plan (amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2007) is hereby amended to read as follows, effective as of January 1, 2007: 

Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan to the contrary, contributions, benefits and service credit with respect to military service will be
provided in accordance with Code Section 414(u). In addition: (a) effective January 1, 2007, the Plan shall apply the requirements of Code Section 401(a)(37) (relating to death benefits for Members who die while performing
qualified military service) and Code Section 414(u)(9) (relating to treatment in the event of death or disability resulting from active military service), and (b) effective January 1, 2009, differential wage payments shall be treated
as provided in Code Section 414(u)(12). 

  

			
	MOODY’S 2010 10-K	 	1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                         456,325
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  236,353
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,543
<INVENTORY>                                    176,477
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               899,857
<PP&E>                                         260,649
<DEPRECIATION>                                 103,422
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,106,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          193,819
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,933
<OTHER-SE>                                     900,157
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,106,938
<SALES>                                      1,337,265
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,337,265
<CGS>                                          722,735
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,058,040
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,292
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                292,517
<INCOME-TAX>                                    86,293
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            206,224
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   206,224
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05


</TABLE>
No. 09-8466.

#### Ralph Jaffe, Petitioner v. Baltimore County Library Board.

559 U.S. 981, 130 S. Ct. 1710,

176 L. Ed. 2d 196,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2085.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 332 Fed. Appx. 6.
*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth

in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 8, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________________

No. 03-40609

__________________________

In the Matter Of: JEROLDE CLARK PARKS

Debtor,

------------------------------------

ORIX CREDIT ALLIANCE INC “EX REL” For Ben B. Floyd Trustee

Appellant,

versus

R & R RENTALS INC; ROBERT N. HERRINGTON

Appellees.

___________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(No. M-02-CV-25)

___________________________________________________

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
2

Orix Credit Alliance appeals an adverse decision in the district court—which

adopted the holdings of the bankruptcy court—arguing that: (1) the bankruptcy court did

not have jurisdiction to rule on the contract dispute; and (2) if that court were vested with

jurisdiction, it erred in entering a take-nothing judgment. Both contentions are misplaced.

The bankruptcy court clearly had jurisdiction to adjudicate this contract dispute that

was “related to” the bankruptcy case. See 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b). We cannot say that the

bankruptcy court, after properly exercising jurisdiction, committed clear error in finding

that a contract had not been formed and in entering a take-nothing judgment. 

For these reasons, the decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Nextest Systems Corporation for the three month period ended
September 29, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Robin Adler, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and James P. Moniz, Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Nextest Systems Corporation, hereby
certify pursuant to Title18, Chapter 63, U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) such Form 10-Q for the three month period ended September 29, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the three month period ended September 29, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Nextest Systems Corporation.



|                       |  |  |  |                                     
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 8, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Robin Adler                     
|                       |  |  |  | Robin Adler                         
|                       |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)       



|                       |  |  |  |                              
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 8, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ James P. Moniz           
|                       |  |  |  | James P. Moniz               
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                       |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
**CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC REPORT**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Alpha Nutra,
      Inc.(the “Company”), certifies that:




1.  The
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31,
      2005
      (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







November
      13, 2006








By:
            /s/Mark
                L. Baum
              Mark
                L. Baum
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer





This
      certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
      to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
      purpose.
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of XRG,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2004, each of the
undersigned Kevin Brennan, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Stephen Couture, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigneds' knowledge and
belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  March 2, 2005                              /s/ Kevin Brennan
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Kevin Brennan
                                                   Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  March 2, 2005                              /s/ Stephen Couture
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Stephen Couture
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-9281.

#### Nina Shahin, Petitioner v. Delaware, et al.

559 U.S. 1091, 130 S. Ct. 2398,

176 L. Ed. 2d 766,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3515.

April 26, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until May 17, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATE
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. 1350)





The
undersigned, Julian R. Geiger has executed this certificate in connection with
the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s report
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2009 (the
“Report”).





The
undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”);
and





2. The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 4th
day of December 2009.





/s/
      JULIANR.
      GEIGERJulian
      R. GeigerChairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)





This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






29
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Amendment  No.1 to Form 10-QSB (the
"Report") of XRG, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004,
each of the undersigned  Richard  Francis,  the Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company, and Stephen Couture, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that,  to the  best of the  undersigneds'
knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  April 29, 2005                          /s/ Richard Francis
                                            -----------------------------
                                                Richard Francis
                                                Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  April 29, 2005                         /s/ Stephen Couture
                                            -----------------------------
                                                Stephen Couture
                                                Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-9244.

#### George Webber, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1043, 130 S. Ct. 2077,

176 L. Ed. 2d 426,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2843.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.