alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Docket 9-2007]

Notice is hereby given of termination of review of a subzone application submitted by the South Carolina State Ports Authority, grantee of FTZ 38, requesting special-purpose subzone status with manufacturing authority for certain ibuprofen products at the pharmaceutical manufacturing facility of Leiner Health Products, LLC, located in Fort Mill, South Carolina. The application was filed on March 2, 2007 (72 FR 10643, 3/9/07).

The termination is the result of changed circumstances, and the case has been closed without prejudice.

Dated: February 17, 2009.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-4039 Filed 2-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
CE-CP-SPRM-NY001-STD-0023 COMMENT 14

ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS 

Proposed Rulemakings and Public Hearings Regarding State Petitions for Exemption from Federal Standards for 

Clothes Dryers and Kitchen Ranges and Ovens 

(Docket Numbers: CE-CP-SPRM) NY001. WI002~ CA003. MN004, OR005 t 

------------------------------------------------------ ---------------~----<':t,.,;.;c::..-.,. SEPTH1BER uri ~ 

. SUNDAY MONDAY TU~DAY 

11 12 

18 

25 

MADISON, WISCONSIN 

SEPTEr4BER 13 

1 : 00 - 5: OOpm 

/ 

MINNEAPOL)S, MINNESOTA 

SEPTEt~ 15 < 

9: 00/,- 5: OOpm . 

0 

SAN FRANC I SCO, CAL.iFbRN IA 

SEPTEMBER 20 ~ 

9:00 - 5:00pm 

PORTLAND, OREGON 

SEPTEMBER 23 

9:00 - 5:00pm 

NEW YORK CITY 

SEPTEMBER 26 

9:00 - 5:00pm 

WASHINGTON, DC 

SEPTEMBER 30 

9:00 - 5:00pm 

WED~E§DAY THRUSDAY FRIDM SATURDAY j~. 

c 

0 " q 

Minneapolis /J 14 15 16 

21 22 

28 29 

212 East Washington Avenue 

Room 215, Small Business Administration 

Madison, Wisconsin 53703 

u. S. Courthouse ~-# 

/Federal Building, Room * . 

110 South 4th Street 

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 

Internal Revenue Service 

333 Market Street 

Suite 700 

San Francisco, California 94105 

17 

24 

Edith Green-Wendell Wyatt Federal BuiJding Room 229 

1220 Southwest Third Avenue 

Portland, Oregon 97204 

Jacob K. Javits Federal Building 26 Federal Plaza, Room 305C 

New York~ New York 

U.S. Department of Energy 

Forrestal Building, Room 1E-245 

1000 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20585 
CE-CP-SPRM-NY001-STD-0023 COMMENT 14
CE-CP-SPRM-NY001-STD-0023 COMMENT 14

REQUEST TO SPE.AX (Location)....,;;;;; .... 

NAME: 

COMPANY: ---------"" 

ADORESS: __________________________________________________ __ 

PRONE: 

LETTER ______________ _ 

15 COPIES OF TESTLMONY: 

------------------ SUBJECT: 

TIME SCHEDULED TO SPEAK: 

-""'-

CONFIF.. .. 1ED : 

----------------
#### State v. Kampf

2016 MT 314N

DA 15-0570

11/29/16

Affirmed

Dist. 11 (Flathead)
Montana Twentieth Judicial District Court. County of Lake.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- JUDE ELLSWORTH, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-08-025

DECISION

On March 16,2016, the Defendant’s March 10,2010 suspended sentence for Count I: Tampering with Witnesses and Informants, in violation of §45-6-206, MCA, was revoked. The Defendant was sentenced to the Montana State Prison for a term of five (5) years with none suspended. The sentence was ordered to run consecutive to the sentence in DC-07-215. He did not receive credit for any other elapsed probationary time due to his probation violations. All relevant previous conditions were re-imposed.

On August 4, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant appeared by Vision Net from Crossroads Correctional Center and was represented by Brent Getty of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

*72Done in open Court this 4th day of August, 2016.

DATED this 24th day of August, 2016.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member and Hon. Brad Newman, Member.
# C_2018356EN.01020101.xml

| 4.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 356/201 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 356/201

---

P8_TA(2017)0465

Accession of Panama, Uruguay, Colombia and El Salvador to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 30 November 2017 on the proposal for a Council decision authorising Austria and Romania to accept, in the interest of the European Union, the accession of Panama, Uruguay, Colombia and El Salvador to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (COM(2017)0369 — C8-0231/2017 — 2017/0153(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2018/C 356/46)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2017)0369), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2017)0369),

| — | having regard to Article 38, fourth paragraph, of the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 38, fourth paragraph, of the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction,

| — | having regard to Article 81(3) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0231/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 81(3) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0231/2017),

| — | having regard to the opinion of the Court of Justice (1) on the exclusive external competence of the European Union for a declaration of acceptance of an accession to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the opinion of the Court of Justice (1) on the exclusive external competence of the European Union for a declaration of acceptance of an accession to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction,

| — | having regard to Rules 78c and 108(8) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 78c and 108(8) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A8-0362/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A8-0362/2017),

| 1. | Approves the authorisation for Austria and Romania to accept, in the interest of the European Union, the accession of Panama, Uruguay, Colombia and El Salvador to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States, as well as to the Permanent Bureau of the Hague Conference on Private International Law. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---

(1)  Opinion of the Court of Justice of 14 October 2014, 1/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2303.

---
Opinion issued September 29, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-16-00640-CV

———————————

HEATHER ROYELLE DEHGAHN, Appellant

V.

MASOUD DEHGAHN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 280th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2016-48803

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed August 5, 2016. On September 1, 

2016, appellant, Heather Royelle Dehgahn, filed a motion for voluntary dismissal, 

asking to withdraw her notice of appeal and dismiss the appeal. This motion 

indicates appellant no longer wishes to pursue her appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.
2

42.1(a)(1). No opinion has issued. More than 10 days have passed and no party has 

responded to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a). 

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Huddle.
P.1 

OAR Box 1802 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

54) IV-E-49 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 11/4/200811:57:59 AM Sheet 54 of 117 
P.2 

A-10-3TA5L-E-41 

Date: February 24,2000 

Air and Radiation Docket # A-90-37 

iBriscolLlntegr itegrate E d Implementation Group, 

ITPID, MD-12 

Subject: Meeting with Complex Manufacturers Group 

On February 10,2000, the EPA met with representatives of a group of complex 

manufacturers (attendee list is attached). The first half of the discussion focused primarily on the 

clean unit test in EPA's July 1996 NSR Reform rulemaking proposal. Some of the topics 

covered included the time by which technology must be applied, the duration of the exclusion 

under the test, and defining BACT where there has been no recent BACT decision. During the 

second half of the meeting, industry representatives presented and defined what they perceived as 

problems under the current NSR program including issues associated with what changes 

constitute a project, changes that debottleneck a process, and units whose operations are linked. 

Attachment 

cc: Pam Smith, (MD-12) 

Jon Devine, OGC 

EPA AIR DOCKET 
P.3 

Mms _ 

g/<3L fjMi^err 

rtyuNk f^OA<W Ujavd 

."[©IM yVvScM I 

WVD'V\ 

foil 

.Chalet Geidb 

(U\,t,k TCKAI^^S 

tfi^lc/AR 

£PA/OA&K 

/^P6A 

HoQrSu.^/MBJ>A 

£{*,.*& r/fll(ic~~KSL 

(TOXO^K- Pacific/Afft 

^ o ^ De. /^B £>Pfrle>Grc 

%//o/oo 

Pf/au& 

3&3L S"W~ I fab*/ 

S\^1 641-5(35 

civ^ 54(- 55.75" 

W 541- o^ / 

4H LSI-1121 

2-
# C_2017441EN.01000201.xml

| 22.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 441/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 441/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8705 — BC Partners/Ceramtec)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 441/03)

On 15 December 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8705. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8705. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2017218EN.01001502.xml

| 7.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 218/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 218/15

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8485 — Hitachi Group/Honda/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 218/04)

On 30 June 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8485. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8485. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
No. 11-7404.

#### Loy C. Hudson, Petitioner v. Department of the Treasury Financial Management Service.

565 U.S. 1165, 132 S. Ct. 1110,

181 L. Ed. 2d 992,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 760,

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amincor, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the  period  ended  March 31,  2011 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on May 23, 2011 (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,  in the
capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.


Date: May 23, 2011                             /s/ John R. Rice, III
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               John R. Rice, III, President
No. 09-9421.

#### Richard A. Smith, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1055, 130 S. Ct. 2364,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2957.

176 L. Ed. 2d 573,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 339 Fed. Appx. 299.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned, Hamish Malkin, of Argentex Mining Corporation,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Argentex Mining
Corporation for the interim period ended July 31, 2006 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Argentex Mining Corporation

Dated: April 8, 2008

|/s/
      Hamish Malkin          | 
|-------------------------------- | 
|Hamish Malkin                    | 
|Chief Financial Officer          | 
|(Principal Financial Officer and | 
|Principal Accounting Officer)    | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Argentex Mining
Corporation and will be retained by Argentex Mining Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
No. 09-7566.

#### Heidi K. Erickson, Petitioner v. Massachusetts.

559 U.S. 1032, 130 S. Ct. 1944,

176 L. Ed. 2d 408,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2385.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1153, 130 S. Ct. 1151, 175 L. Ed. 2d 982, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 754.
Exhibit 32


                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oxford Ventures, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Daniel K. Leonard, as
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


By:  /s/ Daniel K. Leonard
--------------------------
Daniel K. Leonard
President and CFO
September 16, 2004
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Richard Kern, President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, and
Treasurer of American Goldfields Inc. (the “Company”), certifies, under the
standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended April 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.








Date: June
5, 2009











/s/
Richard Kern


---------------------


Richard
Kern


President,
Chief Executive Officer,


Secretary,
and Treasurer


(Principal
Executive Officer,


Principal
Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer)








This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
| (logo)  ncb  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011  Crystal  Drive  Suite, 8oo  Arlington, VA 22202 |
|------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**FORM OF ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

BANK 2017-BNK8, Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2017-BNK8 (the “Trust”)

 

I, Karyn Mann, on behalf ofNational Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB Special Servicer (the “CertifyingServicer”), certify to Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. and its officers,directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent that they will relyupon this certification, that:

 

1.       I (or Servicing Officers under mysupervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicer’s activities during thepreceding calendar year between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018 (the “ReportingPeriod”) and the Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Pooling andServicing Agreement; and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement inall material respects during the Reporting Period.

 

 

Date:February 6, 2019

 

 

NATIONALCOOPERATIVE BANK, N.A.,

asNCB Special Servicer

 

By:/s/ Karyn Mann

Name:Karyn Mann

Title:Senior Vice President
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersignedPresident and Chief Executive Officer of Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2006 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operation of the Company.

Date: June 14, 2006

 
| /s/ Timothy J. Dodd                     |
|-----------------------------------------|
| Timothy J. Dodd                         |
| *President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

 

----
No. 09-9591.

#### Marcelino Ramos-Lopez, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1081, 130 S. Ct. 2123,

176 L. Ed. 2d 746,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3261.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 349 Fed. Appx. 166.