alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DONNIE WINFREY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-4140

[August 23, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Robert E. Belanger, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 2011CF001470E.

Donnie Winfrey, Perry, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. 

Egber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Donnie Winfrey appeals the summary denial of his amended rule 

3.850 motion for postconviction relief. The trial court failed to rule on 

Winfrey’s claim within ground one that counsel failed to advise him, 

before he entered an open plea, that the court could impose consecutive 

sentences. We therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to 

consider that claim. See, e.g., Hebert v. State, 162 So. 3d 64 (Fla. 4th 

DCA 2014). We affirm the denial of Winfrey’s other claims.

Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
NO. 07-09-0147-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	JUNE 2, 2009

	______________________________

	ERIC LEE DIAZ, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

	NO. 16202-A; HONORABLE HAL MINER, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.  

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant Eric Lee Diaz appeals from the March 24, 2009 revocation of his probation.  Appellant filed his notice of appeal with the trial court on May 7 and, on May 11, filed with this Court his motion for extension of time to file his notice of appeal.1

	A late notice of appeal is considered timely and thus invokes the appellate court's jurisdiction in a criminal appeal if (1) it is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing, (2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal, and (3) the court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519 (Tex.Crim.App.1996).  When a notice of appeal is filed within the fifteen-day period but no timely motion for extension of time is filed, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction. Id. at 522, citing Charles v. State, 809 S.W.2d 574, 576 (Tex.App.–San Antonio 1991, no pet.). 

	The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals applies Rule 26.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure strictly, Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522-26; Tex. R. App. P. 26.3, and has expressly held that without a timely-filed notice of appeal or motion for extension of time, we cannot exercise jurisdiction over an appeal. See Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522; see also Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 209 n.3 (Tex.Crim.App.1998).

	The clerk’s record has been filed.  It contains no motion for new trial.  According to Rule 26.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and the case law, then, appellant had thirty days after the day sentence was imposed to file notice of appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 21.4, 26.2(a)(1).  Appellant’s probation was revoked on March 24, 2009, giving appellant until April 23 to file a notice of appeal.   Appellant filed his notice of appeal on May 7, fourteen days after the April 23 deadline.  However, appellant did not file a motion for extension of time to file his notice of appeal as required until May 11, eighteen days after the deadline on which to file his notice.  Hence, this appeal is untimely, and we are without jurisdiction to hear it. 

	Accordingly, we must, and do dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.2

							Per Curiam

Do not publish.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Yu Chang, the Chief Executive Officer of CHINA AGRITECH, INC.
      (the
“Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.  
      The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
      2007 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  
      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 14th
      day of November, 2007.





/s/
      Yu Chang





Yu
      Chang


Chief
      Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Agritech, Inc. and will be retained by China Agritech, Inc. and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





The
      forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      and
      is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
      made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
      language in such filing
IIB 

Calendar No. 492 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4786 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2006 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 22, 2006 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 535 Wood Street in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 

as the ‘‘H. Gordon Payrow Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 535 Wood Street in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘H. Gordon Payrow 

7 Post Office Building’’. 
2 

•HR 4786 RS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘H. Gordon Payrow Post Office Building’’. 

Calendar No. 492 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4786 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. lehem, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘H. Gordon Payrow al Service located at 535 Wood Street in BethJUNE 22, 2006 

Reported without amendment
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the periodic report of CelLynx Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Norman Collins, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





Date: May 16, 2011

/s/ Norman CollinsNorman Collins

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AFV Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Suzanne Herring, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/Suzanne Herring |
|--------|--------------------|

|   | Suzanne Herring |
|--------|-----------------|

|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|

|   | November 9, 2007 |
|--------|------------------|
----

Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned, Yu Chang, the Chief Executive Officer ofCHINA AGRITECH, INC. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that: 

1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report"), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operation of theCompany. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed thisstatement this 14th day of November 2006. 

|   | /s/ Yu Chang                  |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | Yu Chang                      |
|   | Chief Executive    Officer    |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer) |

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to China Agritech, Inc. and will beretained by China Agritech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request. 

The forgoing certification is being furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It isnot being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofthe Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing. 

----
No. 09-8977.

#### Tyrone Owens, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1041, 130 S. Ct. 2072,

176 L. Ed. 2d 422,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2836.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 09-985.

#### In re Stacy Ann Patterson, Petitioner.

559 U.S. 1066, 130 S. Ct. 2110,

176 L. Ed. 2d 758,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3140,

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
### OPAction Development Series Office of Regulatory Policy and January 2012 Management Latest revision 1 9 12 

# Rule Aid 

# EPA Policy 

# on Consultation 

# and Coordination with Indian Tribes

The 

## EPA Policy 

### on Consultation 

### and Coordination with Indian Tribes 

## EPA Consultation Policy effective 

## May 4 2011 responds to the Presidential 

## Memorandum on Tribal Consultation issued 

### November 5 2009 directing agencies to develop a plan to fully 1 implement Executive Order

### 13175 The 

## EPA Consultation Policy sets abroad standard for

### when 

## EPA should consider consulting with federally recognized tribal governments This standard for consultation applies to a

### wide range of

### Agency activities 

### and is based 

### on the directive for tribal consultation established under Executive Order 

### 13175 and the principles expressed inthe 

### 1984 

## EPA Policy forthe Administration of Environmental 

### Programson Indian Reservations Executive Order

### 13175 applies toa narrower setof activities primarily rulemakings than the

## EPA Consultation Policy but 

### when it does apply additional procedural requirements 

### beyond those set out in the

## EPA Consultation Policy 

### must be

### met

This is the first of

### two Rule Aids 

### on tribal consultation 

### Once a determination is

## made
that an action warrants consultation under the broader 

## EPA Consultation Policy 

### Rule Aid Executive 

### Order13175 Consultation 

### and Coordination with Indian Tribal 

### Governments mustbe referenced todetermine whether the additional procedural requirements apply under Executive Order

### 13175 

# The Standard for

# Consultation 

# under the

# EPA Consultation Policy

The standard under the 

## EPA Consultation Policy is to consult 

### on a

### government to government basis with federally recognized tribes

### when 

## EPA actions 

### and decisions 

### may affect tribal interests

## ORGANIZATION TCA ALTERNATE
Region I Mike Stover Region II Janice Whitney Region III Terry Gallagher Region IV CindyJ Nolan Region 

## V Kestutis Ambutas Region VI Jeannine Hale Randy Gee Region VII Wolfgang Brandner Region VIII Alfreda Mitre Region IX Nate Lau Gilbert Pasqua Region 

## X SallyThomas 

## OARM Raul Soto 

## OAR C Darrel Harmon 

## OCFO MaryJo Blumenfeld Marc Vincent 

### OCSPP Caren Robinson 

## OECA Jonathan Binder Fran Jonesi OEI Beth Jackson 

## OGC Jessica Scott 

### OITA David Guest 

### OP Ken Munis 

## ORD Monica Rodia 

## OSWER Andrew Baca 

# OW Felicia Wright
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 21 (Thursday, January 31, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 6807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02056]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Georgia Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) and the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act that the Georgia Advisory Committee 
(Committee) will hold a public consultation on Tuesday, February 19, 
2013, for the purpose to learn about effective implementation of 
immigration policy from federal and state officials, law enforcement 
officials, business leaders, and community leaders. The afternoon 
session will convene at 2:30 p.m. and adjourn at approximately 4:30 
p.m. The evening session will convene at 6:00 p.m. and adjourn at 
approximately 8:30 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Gwinnett 
Center, 6400 Sugarloaf Parkway, Duluth, GA 30097.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by March 19, 2013. 
Written comments may be mailed to the Southern Regional Office, U.S. 
Commission on Civil Rights, 61 Forsyth St. SW., Suite 16T126, Atlanta, 
GA 30303. They may also be faxed to the Commission at (404) 562-7005, 
or emailed to the Commission at pminarik@usccr.gov. Persons who desire 
additional information may contact the Southern Regional Office at 
(404) 562-7000.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Southern 
Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Southern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this Committee 
are directed to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or may 
contact the Southern Regional Office at the above email or street 
address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the rules and regulations 
of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, January 25, 2013.
David Mussatt,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2013-02056 Filed 1-30-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. §1350



In connection with the quarterly report of Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William B. Olson, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This Certification has not been, and shall not be
deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.



|                        |  |                                                       
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Date: December 12, 2005 |  |                                                       
|                        |  | /s/ WILLIAM B. OLSON                                  
|                        |  | William B. Olson Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
# C_2017393EN.01000101.xml

| 21.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 393/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 393/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8634 — ATP/OTPP/Copenhagen Airports)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 393/01)

On 7.11.2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8634. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8634. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
No. 09-7761.

#### Laurie Marie Laskey, Petitioner v. Vision Infosoft.

559 U.S. 998, 130 S. Ct. 1756,

176 L. Ed. 2d 224,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2313.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1155, 130 S. Ct. 1156, 175 L. Ed. 2d 985, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 680.
No. 09-9811.

#### Henry Hordge, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1100, 130 S. Ct. 2391,

176 L. Ed. 2d 781,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3646.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 350 Fed. Appx. 970.
# 04-74169  Salinas v Gonzales

Trott Wardlaw W Fletcher

148.35605
No. 09-8981.

#### Antony J. Dick, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.

559 U.S. 1072, 130 S. Ct. 2098,

176 L. Ed. 2d 731,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3451.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District, denied.

Same case below, 602 Pa. 180, 978 A.2d 956.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0616 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ANTHONY THOMAS DISHON,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 15, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening bri ef on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 9 2022

03/09/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0616