alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Joyce L. Connery, Chair

Thomas A. Summers, Vice Chair

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES

SAFETY BOARD

Washington, DC 20004-2901

January 19, 2024

To the Congress of the United States:

Pursuant to 42 United States Code § 2286c(b)(2)(B)(i), the Defense Nuclear Facilities 

Safety Board (Board) is required to identify each request for access to information which the 

Board submitted to the Secretary of Energy in written form during the six-month period ending 

December 31, 2023, and which the Secretary denied. The Board has no denials of access to 

information to report in the past six months. The Board worked with the U.S. Department of 

Energy to achieve an acceptable resolution for delayed responses reported in the previous report 

to Congress dated July 31, 2023.

If you have any questions, please contact our Associate Director for Board Operations, 

Tara Tadlock, at 202-694-7090 or TaraT@dnfsb.gov.

Sincerely,

Joyce L. Connery

Chair

c: Mr. Joe Olencz
1. 

2. 

AFFIRMATION OF BOARD VOTING RECORD

SUBJECT: RFBA by Chair Joyce Connery - Denials of Information - semiannual report to Congress

Doc Control#: 2024-100-0009

The Board acted on the above document on 01/25/2024. The document was Approved.

The votes were recorded as:

APRVD DISAPRVD ABSTAIN NOT 

PARTICIPATING COMMENT DATE

Joyce L. Connery 01/16/2024

Thomas Summers 01/18/2024

This Record contains a summary of voting on this matter together with the individual vote sheets, views 

and comments of the Board Members.

Nicole Thomas-Hawkins

Board Operations Specialist to the Board

Attachments:

Voting Summary

Board Member Vote Sheets
DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

NOTATIONAL VOTE RESPONSE SHEET

FROM: Joyce L. Connery

SUBJECT: RFBA by Chair Joyce Connery - Denials of Information - semiannual report to Congress

Doc Control#: 2024-100-0009

DATE: 01/16/2024

VOTE: Approved

COMMENTS:

None

Joyce L. Connery
DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

NOTATIONAL VOTE RESPONSE SHEET

FROM: Thomas Summers

SUBJECT: RFBA by Chair Joyce Connery - Denials of Information - semiannual report to Congress

Doc Control#: 2024-100-0009

DATE: 01/18/2024

VOTE: Approved

COMMENTS:

None

Thomas Summers
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
 
 
 
 **Certification
        of Chief Financial Officer of ULURU Inc.**
 **Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant**
 **to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of ULURU Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
        10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the
“Report”), the undersigned officer of ULURU INC. does hereby certify, pursuant
        to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
        (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:
 
 (1.)           The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2.)           The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
        Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
        upon request.
 
 
 
 Date:
                  November 13, 2007
              
              /s/
                  Terrance K. WallbergTerrance
                  K. WallbergVice
                  President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
                  Financial and Accounting Officer)
No. 11-7418.

#### Kenneth Taylor, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1131, 132 S. Ct. 1049,

181 L. Ed. 2d 770,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 164.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 644 F.3d 573.
Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10.56H 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 TO THE 

PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY 
 EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 
 (Amended and Restated
Effective January 1, 2009) 
 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 11.4 thereof, the Pioneer Natural Resources
Company Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009) is hereby amended to restate Section 2.1(o) in its entirety as follows: 
 “Eligible Employee” means any individual employed by a Company who is (i) an officer of the Company or (ii) a member of a select group of management or highly compensated
employees (A) designated by the Plan Administrator from time to time as being eligible to participate in the Plan and (B) whose annual rate of Basic Compensation is $185,000 or above and whose designated grade level is at least grade 23 in
the Company’s general salary grade structure or an equivalent grade in the specialized grade structure, as determined by the Plan Administrator; provided, however, that the Basic Compensation and grade level requirements provided in
clause (ii)(B) of this subsection shall not apply to Members in the Plan as of December 31, 2008. An Eligible Employee shall remain an Eligible Employee notwithstanding any reduction in his or her annual rate of Basic Compensation below the
applicable minimum under clause (ii)(B) of this subsection; provided, however, that the Plan Administrator in its discretion may withdraw an individual’s designation as an Eligible Employee under clause (ii) at any time and for any
reason effective with respect to any subsequent Plan Year. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed on this 13th
day of December, 2010, to be effective January 1, 2011. 
  

			
	PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY
		
	 By
	 	 /s/ Larry N. Paulsen

		 	 Larry N. Paulsen

		 	 Vice President, Administration and Risk Management
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Amincor, Inc. (the "Company")
on  Form  10-Q/A  for the  period  ended  June  30,  2011  (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the capacity and on the date indicated below,  hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.


Date: October 24, 2011                  /s/ John R. Rice, III
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        John R. Rice, III, President
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. §1350

In connection with the quarterly report of Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William B. Olson, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.

Date:
February 11, 2010



/S/ WILLIAM B. OLSONWilliam B. OlsonChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
No. 09-1104.

#### Marlene Whittier, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Anthony Diotaiuto deceased and individually, Andrew Diotaiuto, Petitioners v. Daniel Kobayashi, individually; Marlene Whittier, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Anthony Diotaiuto deceased and individually, Andrew Diotaiuto, Petitioners v. Eric Goldstein, individually, and Eirk Palacio, individually; and Marlene Whittier, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Anthony Diotaiuto deceased and individually, Andrew Diotaiuto, Petitioners v. Andre Bruna, individually and Sean Visners, individually.

560 U.S. 905, 130 S. Ct. 3286,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1185,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3990.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 581 F.3d 1304 (first judgment); 343 Fed. Appx. 517 (second judgment); 343 Fed. Appx. 505 (third judgment).
No. 11-7859.

#### Robert Mann, Petitioner v. Patricia R. Stansberry, Warden.

565 U.S. 1182, 132 S. Ct. 1154,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1026,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 960.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 441 Fed. Appx. 1000.
# C_2017348EN.01000201.xml

| 17.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 348/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 348/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8624 — Michael Kors/Jimmy Choo)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 348/03)

On 9 October 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8624. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8624. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
No. 09-10008.

#### Tommy Carver, Petitioner v. Boyd Bennett, et al.

560 U.S. 914, 130 S. Ct. 3297,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1200,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4076,

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 353 Fed. Appx. 859.
No. 09-9500.

#### Randy Brown, Petitioner v. Georgia.

560 U.S. 908, 130 S. Ct. 3281,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1190,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3921.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
# C_2016049EN.01000401.xml

| 9.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/4 |
| -------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------ |

---

2016 update of the allowances applicable to experts on secondment to the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union

(2016/C 49/06)

In accordance with Article 19(6) of Council Decision (EU) 2015/1027 of 23 June 2015 concerning the rules applicable to experts on secondment to the General Secretariat of the Council and repealing Decision 2007/829/EC( 1 ):

| 1. | from 1 January 2016, the daily allowance is set at EUR 131,76; |
| -- | -------------------------------------------------------------- |

| 2. | from 1 January 2016, the scale used to calculate reimbursements due on the basis of the distance between the place of origin and the place of secondment (in km) is as follows:
Distance between the place of origin and the place of secondment (in km)
Amount (in EUR) 0-150
0,00 > 150
84,68 > 300
150,56 > 500
244,68 > 800
395,24 > 1 300
621,11 > 2 000
743,46 | Distance between the place of origin and the place of secondment (in km) | Amount (in EUR) | 0-150 | 0,00 | > 150 | 84,68 | > 300 | 150,56 | > 500 | 244,68 | > 800 | 395,24 | > 1 300 | 621,11 | > 2 000 | 743,46 |
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------- | ----- | ---- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ------ | ----- | ------ | ----- | ------ | ------- | ------ | ------- | ------ |
| Distance between the place of origin and the place of secondment (in km) | Amount (in EUR) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 0-150 | 0,00 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| > 150 | 84,68 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| > 300 | 150,56 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| > 500 | 244,68 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| > 800 | 395,24 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| > 1 300 | 621,11 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| > 2 000 | 743,46 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

---

( 1 )  OJ L 163, 30.6.2015, p. 40.

---
No. 09-9387.

#### Kris Durschmidt, Petitioner v. City of Chandler, Arizona.

559 U.S. 1110, 130 S. Ct. 2410,

176 L. Ed. 2d 929,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3820.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One, denied.
No. 09-9818.

#### Armando Henao-Melo, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1100, 130 S. Ct. 2392,

176 L. Ed. 2d 782,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3538.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 591 F.3d 798.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5107 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5107

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1400 West Jordan Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ``Earl D. 
                     Hutto Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1400 
West Jordan Street in Pensacola, Florida, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Earl D. Hutto Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Earl D. Hutto Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 2, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5107

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1400 West Jordan Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ``Earl D. 
                     Hutto Post Office Building''.
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 66 (Thursday, April 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 20633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8127]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS12-05]

Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104(b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:
    Location: OCC--250 E Street SW., Room 8C, Washington, DC 20219.
    Date: April 11, 2012.
    Time: 10:30 a.m.
    Status: Open.

Matters To Be Considered

Summary Agenda

    March 14, 2012 minutes--Open Session
    (No substantive discussion of the above items is anticipated. These 
matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a member of the ASC 
requests that an item be moved to the discussion agenda.)

Discussion Agenda

    Appraisal Foundation December 2011 grant reimbursement request.
    Proposed revision of ASC Rules of Operation governing Vice 
Chairperson of the ASC.
    Kansas Compliance Review.

How To Attend and Observe an ASC Meeting

    Email your name, organization and contact information to 
meetings@asc.gov. You may also send a written request via U.S. Mail, 
fax or commercial carrier to the Executive Director of the ASC, 1401 H 
Street NW., Ste. 760, Washington, DC 20005. The fax number is 202-289-
4101. Your request must be received no later than 4:30 p.m., ET, on the 
Monday prior to the meeting. Attendees must have a valid government-
issued photo ID and must agree to submit to reasonable security 
measures. The meeting space is intended to accommodate public 
attendees. However, if the space will not accommodate all requests, the 
ASC may refuse attendance on that reasonable basis. The use of any 
video or audio tape recording device, photographing device, or any 
other electronic or mechanical device designed for similar purposes is 
prohibited at ASC meetings.

    Dated: March 30, 2012.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2012-8127 Filed 4-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Print	

The Intelligence Community is committed to growing the next generation of intelligence professionals by offering current students a variety of temporary employment and scholarship opportunities. Click here to download the "IC Opportunities for Students" brochure.  

### About The ODNI

The Director of National Intelligence serves as the head of the U.S. Intelligence Community, overseeing and directing the implementation of the National Intelligence Program and acting as the principal advisor to the President, the National Security Council, and the Homeland Security Council for intelligence matters related to national security. The Office of the DNI's goal is to effectively integrate foreign, military and domestic intelligence in defense of the homeland and of United States interests abroad.ODNI is comprised of a headquarters element, three national centers (NCTC, the National Counterterroism Center; NCPC, the National Counterproliferation Center; and NCSC, the National Counterintelligence and Security Center) as well as the National Intelligence Council and IARPA, the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity.You can learn which agencies offer what specific opportunities by consulting the Student/Special Programs web page of each particular agency. You may also visit https://www.intelligencecareers.gov/ for additional information on Intelligence Community opportunities available for students.

----
************************

• MONOGRAPH NO.: 6A6

************************

ITEM: Orange Juice, (BOJ)

 Instant

NSN: 8915-00-530-3414 ITEM SPECIFICATION: MIL-J-35049

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: None

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

 APPEARANCE: Dehydrated: Yellow/orange granular powder.

Rehydrated: Yellow/orange liquid; some fine pulp may be present.

 ODOR: Typical mild orange; very slight.

 FLAVOR: Characteristics orange; sweet and tart.

 TEXTURE: Dehydrated: Granular, free flowing; lumps should

break up with light pressure. Rehydrated: Typical juice or water

mouth feel; some particulate matter may be detectable.

 ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT 70 DEGREES F: 36 months

 80 DEGREES F: 30 months

 90 DEGREES F: 24 months

 100 DEGREES F: 18 months

EXPECTED DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

 APPEARANCE: Dehydrated: Browning/darkening of powder; lumping.

Rehydrated: Product may appear darker.

 ODOR: Little change; burned/scorched odor may be detectable.

 FLAVOR: Bitter or burned.

 TEXTURE: Dehydrated: Lumps will occur and be hard and

nonfriable; reconstitution may be difficult. Rehydrated: Little

change expected.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: Remove dessicant pouch (if

present) before reconstitution. Initial examination should be in

the granular (dehydrated) form. Final examination should be

performed after reconstitution IAW package instructions.

SPECIAL NOTES: Each can is designed to yield 18 portions of 12

ounces each when reconstituted.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Kenneth Hicks, President and a director of Argentex Mining Corporation (Principal Executive Officer), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Argentex Mining Corporation for the interim period ended April 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Argentex Mining Corporation

Dated:  June 14, 2006

 

/s/ Kenneth Hicks                              

Kenneth Hicks

President and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Argentex Mining Corporation and will be retained by Argentex Mining Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.