alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4997 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4997

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To extend for 2 years the authority to grant waivers of the foreign 
  country residence requirement with respect to certain international 
                           medical graduates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Physicians for Underserved Areas 
Act''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF FOREIGN COUNTRY RESIDENCE REQUIREMENT WITH RESPECT TO 
              INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL GRADUATES.

    Section 220(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Technical 
Corrections Act of 1994 (8 U.S.C. 1182 note; Public Law 103-416) (as 
amended by section 1(a)(1) of Public Law 108-441) is amended by 
striking ``June 1, 2006.'' and inserting ``June 1, 2008.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 2 shall take effect as if enacted on 
May 31, 2006.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 6, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4997

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To extend for 2 years the authority to grant waivers of the foreign 
  country residence requirement with respect to certain international 
                           medical graduates.
```
No. 09-7358.

#### James W. Van Divner, Jr., Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.

559 U.S. 1038, 130 S. Ct. 2060,

176 L. Ed. 2d 416,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2764.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District, denied.

Same case below, 599 Pa. 617, 962 A.2d 1170.
Order entered August 1, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01511-CR

LUIS ARMANDO QUIROZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 10

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MA-1470927-L

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was due March 8, 2017. By postcard dated March 9, 2017, we 

informed appellant his brief was past due and directed him to file his brief within ten days along 

with a motion to extend time. When appellant did not respond, we abated the appeal for a 

hearing. Appellant then filed a motion to extend time to file his brief and, in the interest of 

expediting the appeal, we vacated our prior order and extended the time for filing appellant’s 

brief until May 18, 2017. When no brief was filed, we ordered retained counsel Samuel Beale to 

file appellant’s brief by July 14, 2017, and cautioned counsel that the failure to file a brief by the 

deadline would result in this Court abating the case for a hearing. To date, no brief has been 

filed and Mr. Beale has failed to communicate with the Court regarding this appeal.
Therefore, the Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why 

appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings 

and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Roberto Canas Jr., 

Presiding Judge, County Criminal Court No. 10; to Samuel Beale; and to the Dallas County 

District Attorney’s Office.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
No. 11-7503.

#### Greg Lynn Beauchamp, Petitioner v. Texas.

565 U.S. 1180, 132 S. Ct. 1148,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1022,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 954.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-09-034-CV

IN RE WILLIAM EMMANUEL RELATOR

GLENN HARTFIELD

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is

of the opinion that relief should be denied. The Tarrant County District Clerk’s

office and Judge Mike Thomas of Criminal District Court Number Four have

both informed this court that they have not received relator’s “motion

requesting to check out the trial records on loan.” Accordingly, relator’s

petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED: February 12, 2009
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**











**Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer of ULURU Inc.**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant**


**to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ULURU Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the
“Report”), the undersigned officer of ULURU INC. does hereby certify, pursuant
      to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
      (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1.)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2.)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.











Date:
                August 10, 2007
            
            /s/
                Terrance K. WallbergTerrance
                K. WallbergVice
                President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)
AFS-12-008-E 

October 31, 2011 

 Exemption No. 10178B 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-1012 

Mr. Omer ErSelcuk 

President/Chief Executive Officer 

Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines 

1210 Watergut 

Christianstead, VI 00820 

Dear Mr. ErSelcuk: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 10178, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated October 3, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines (Seaborne Airlines) for an 

extension of Exemption No. 10178, as amended, to June 30, 2012. That exemption from 

§ 121.305(j) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Seaborne Airlines to continue to 

conduct domestic, flag, and supplemental operations in the islands of the Caribbean without 

installing a third gyroscopic bank and pitch indicator. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Seaborne Airlines. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10178, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10178, as amended, to June 30, 

2012 unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

David C. Gilliom 

Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 42 (Thursday, March 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9623-9624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4737]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[NM-920-1310-09; NMNM 101579, NMNM 101580]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Leases 
NMNM 101579 and NMNM 101580

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Class II provisions of Title IV, Public Law 97-451, 
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for 
reinstatement of oil and gas leases NMNM 101579 and NMNM 101580 from 
the lessee, Yates Petroleum Corp. et al. for lands in Chaves County, 
New Mexico. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all 
the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margie Dupre, BLM, New Mexico State 
Office, at (505) 438-7520.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: No valid lease has been issued that affects 
the lands. The lessee agrees to new lease terms for rentals and 
royalties of $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year,

[[Page 9624]]

and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessee paid the required $500.00 
administrative fee for the reinstatement of the lease and $166.00 cost 
for publishing this Notice in the Federal Register. The lessee met all 
the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Section 
31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). We 
are proposing to reinstate leases NMNM 101579 and NMNM 101580, 
effective the date of termination, December 1, 2008, under the original 
terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty 
rates cited above.
    Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

    Dated: February 27, 2009.
Margie Dupre,
Land Law Examiner, Fluids Adjudication Team.
 [FR Doc. E9-4737 Filed 3-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-P
# C_2016422EN.01000201.xml

| 17.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 422/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 422/2

---

WITHDRAWAL OF COMMISSION PROPOSALS

(2016/C 422/02)

List of withdrawn proposals

List of withdrawn proposals

| Document | Inter-institutional procedure | Title |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Foreign Affairs & Security Policy |
| COM/2013/097 | 2013/0059 (COD) | Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Registered Traveller Programme |

Document

Inter-institutional procedure

Title

Foreign Affairs & Security Policy

Foreign Affairs & Security Policy

COM/2013/097

2013/0059 (COD)

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Registered Traveller Programme

---
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 2303

In re: PHILIP JAY FETNER , Debtor

.

------------------------------------ PHILIP JAY FETNER , Debtor

- Appellant ,

v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY; HOTEL STREET CAPITAL; IRS; US TRUSTEE; STEPHEN S. ROSZEL, VII, et.al. , Creditors

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Rossie David Alston, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:19

- cv
- 00899

- RDA

- IDD )

Submitted : April 16, 2020 Decided: April 20, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Philip J. Fetner, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Ann Levene , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Hugh Michael Bernstein, OFFICE OF THE UNITED2 STATES TRUSTEE, Baltimore, Maryland; Andrew Justin Narod, BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP, Washington, D.C.; William Davis Ashwell, MARK B. WILLIAMS & AS SOCIATES, PLC, Warrenton, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Philip Jay Fetner appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his bankruptcy appeal as untimely and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fetner v. Wilmington Sav

. Fund , No. 1:19

- cv
- 008 99

- RDA

- IDD (E.D. Va. Sept. 9, 2019; Oct. 17, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
First Amendment dated June 29, 2010





			
	[PATHEON]	  	Exhibit 10.31

 7070
Mississauga Road, Suite 350 
 Mississauga, Ontario L5N 7J8 
 www.patheon.com 
  

			
	June 29, 2010	  	Patheon.com

 Ms. Doaa A. Fathallah

 Weidstrasse II 
 6300 Zug 

Switzerland 
 Re: First
Amendment to Employment Agreement 
 Dear Doaa: 
 I am writing to confirm our agreement to amend the language of your May 6, 2008 Employment Agreement with Patheon International AG, as successor entity to Patheon International GmbH (the
“Employment Agreement”) as follows: 
  

	8.	International Relocation Allowance 

 The Company shall continue to pay you the international relocation allowance amount set forth in your Employment Agreement for so long as you are working for Patheon in Switzerland. 

 

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	/s/ Wesley P. Wheeler
	Patheon International AG
	By:	 	Wesley P. Wheeler
	Title:	 	Authorized Signatory
Exhibit 32.1


              SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report (the "Report") of TCI
Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), David R. Butler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to TCI Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by TCI Solutions, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: August 13, 2004                      By:   /s/ David R. Butler
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 David R. Butler
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-7298.

#### Derrondas M. Reed, Petitioner v. David Rednour, Warden.

565 U.S. 1162, 132 S. Ct. 1103,

181 L. Ed. 2d 988,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 725.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eon Labs, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Bernhard Hampl, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|             | /s/  Bernhard Hampl, Ph.D. |   |
|------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|             | Bernhard  Hampl, Ph.D.     |
|             | Chief  Executive Officer   |
|             |                       |
|             |                       |
| August 12,  2003 |                       |

 

1

----
No. 09-9140.

#### Steven Crain, Petitioner v. Clark County Public Defender, et al.

559 U.S. 1076, 130 S. Ct. 2109,

176 L. Ed. 2d 737,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3324,

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 953.
Exhibit 24



POWER OF ATTORNEY



The undersigned does hereby appoint G. Peter DAloia, Mary Elizabeth Gustafsson and Mark C. Cresitello as their true and lawful attorneys to sign American Standard
Companies Inc. (the Corporation) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, and any amendments thereto, on behalf of the undersigned as a director of the Corporation, and to file the same, with any exhibits
thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission; each of said attorneys shall have the power to act hereunder with or without the others.



|                                               |  |                  
|---------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------
|Signature                                      |  | Date             
|/s/ Steven E. AndersonSteven E. Anderson       |  | February 21, 2006
|                                               | 
|/s/ Jared L. CohonJared L. Cohon               |  | February 21, 2006
|                                               | 
|/s/ Paul J. CurlanderPaul J. Curlander         |  | February 21, 2006
|                                               | 
|/s/ Steven F. GoldstoneSteven F. Goldstone     |  | February 15, 2006
|                                               | 
|/s/ Kirk S. HachigianKirk S. Hachigian         |  | February 21, 2006
|                                               | 
|/s/ Edward E. HagenlockerEdward E. Hagenlocker |  | February 21, 2006
|                                               | 
|/s/ James F. HardymonJames F. Hardymon         |  | February 17, 2006
|                                               | 
|/s/ Ruth Ann MarshallRuth Ann Marshall         |  | February 22, 2006
|                                               | 
|/s/ Dale F. MorrisonDale F. Morrison           |  | February 21, 2006
No. 09-7780.

#### Richard Daron Kennedy, Petitioner v. John R. Lockett, et al.

559 U.S. 942, 130 S. Ct. 1507,

176 L. Ed. 2d 119,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1301,

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             216
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,601
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,652)
<INVENTORY>                                     29,947
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,539
<PP&E>                                         157,504
<DEPRECIATION>                                (45,750)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 278,657
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,492
<BONDS>                                        227,456
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (111,716)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   278,657
<SALES>                                        263,962
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               263,962
<CGS>                                          230,512
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  256,275
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    79
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,710
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,102)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,667)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,435)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  5,143
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,292)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (12,292)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (12,292)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 99 (b)

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I hereby certify that this Form 10-Q, containing Bank One Corporation's
consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2003,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



May 8, 2003                                           /s/ Heidi Miller
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                        Heidi Miller
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Bank One Corporation and will be retained by Bank One
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

                                       68