alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-24-00244-CR

Manuel Becerril ESPINOZA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2023CR5174

Honorable Andrew Carruthers, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 8, 2024

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

On March 20, 2024, appellant filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record, which was filed 

on April 2, 2024, does not contain a judgment of conviction or other appealable order.

Additionally, the clerk’s record appears to show that appellant has not yet been tried or sentenced 

in this case because he has been found incompetent to stand trial.1

1 The most recent order in the clerk’s record is an August 10, 2023 Agreed Judgment of Incompetency. On February 

21, 2024, we dismissed appellant’s appeal from that order for want of jurisdiction. See Espinoza v. State, No. 04-24-

00017-CR, 2024 WL 697100, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Feb. 21, 2024, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not 

designated for publication).
04-24-00244-CR

- 2 -

Generally, a criminal defendant may only appeal from a final judgment of conviction. See 

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02; State v. Sellers, 790 S.W.2d 316, 321 n.4 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1990). Because no final judgment of conviction has been signed in this case, it appears the 

ruling, if any, appellant seeks to challenge is interlocutory. The courts of appeals lack jurisdiction 

to review interlocutory orders unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law. Ragston 

v. State, 424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). 

On April 4, 2024, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing by April 19, 2024 why 

this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant did not respond to our order. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See id. at 50–52.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
- - - - - - - -
NO. 21-0298 IN THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF K.G. § § § § § § Hunt County, 5th District.
May 14, 2021 Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

 I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under the date shown. WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this the 17th day of June, 2021.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Hamish Malkin, Chief Financial Officer of Argentex Mining Corporation (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer), certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Argentex Mining Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:  June 14, 2006

 

/s/ Hamish Malkin                            

Hamish Malkin

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)
----

----

**Exhibit        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO **

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                  report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                 |                                                                 |                                         |
|------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
| Date: December                    20, 2007 | By:                                                        | /s/ Chaslav                    Radovich |
|                                                 | Chaslav                    Radovich                                  |
|                                                 | Acting Chief                    Financial                    Officer |
No. 09-9460.

#### In re Dwight York, aka Malachi York, Petitioner.

559 U.S. 1036, 130 S. Ct. 2083,

176 L. Ed. 2d 430,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2906,

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending September 30,2010 of A123 Systems, Inc. (the “Company”), as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David P.Vieau, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 10,  2010 |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   |
| /s/ David P. Vieau             |   |
| David P. Vieau                 |   |
| Chief Executive Officer        |   |

 

----
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 22095 STANDARD 20.18 -0.45 -10.26

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Shade Number DARK BLUE 3394 Piece/Roll Number 22095

DLA/NAVY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT August 12, 2022

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, RIPSTOP, FLAME RESISTANT NU PD-21006

(CLASS 1)

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF
No. 09-8987.

#### Charles Lee Armstrong, Petitioner v. L. E. Scribner, Warden.

559 U.S. 1041, 130 S. Ct. 2072,

176 L. Ed. 2d 422,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2854.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 09-8705.

#### James L. Rudzavice, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 984, 130 S. Ct. 1718,

176 L. Ed. 2d 201,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1921.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 586 F.3d 310.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT
                  TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cortelco Systems Puerto
Rico, Inc. ("Registrant") I, Sergio Moren, Chief Executive Officer of
Registrant, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.

Date: December 11, 2003                     /s/    Sergio Moren
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Sergio Moren
                                            Chief Executive Officer





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cortelco Systems Puerto
Rico, Inc. ("Registrant") I, Francisco Sanchez, Chief Financial Officer of
Registrant , certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.

Date: December 11, 2003                     /s/    Francisco Sanchez
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Francisco Sanchez
                                            Chief Financial Officer






                                       30
No. 09-8440.

#### Michael Charles Jones, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 956, 130 S. Ct. 1552,

176 L. Ed. 2d 142,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1156.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 347 Fed. Appx. 895.
No. 09-583.

#### Henrietta Browning, Petitioner v. United States, et al.

559 U.S. 1067, 130 S. Ct. 2090,

176 L. Ed. 2d 722,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3448.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 567 F.3d 1038 and 340 Fed. Appx. 353.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 21, 2019

NO. 03-18-00658-CV

Retirement and Nursing Center - Austin Ltd., Appellant

v.

Israel Joseph, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of 

Adriana Lopez Joseph, Deceased, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the orders signed by the trial court on February 2, 2017 and September 19, 

2018. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the trial court’s orders. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s orders. 

Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, William F. Holt, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Eon Labs, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)             designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)             disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

a)             all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)                                     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

Date: August 9, 2004

 
| /s/ William  F. Holt     |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| William F.  Holt         |
| Chief  Financial Officer |

 

1

----
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

   Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of West Bancorporation, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas R. Gulling,
Chief Financial Officer of West Bancorporation, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
conditions and results of operations of West Bancorporation, Inc.


November 3, 2005


/s/ Douglas R. Gulling
----------------------------------------------------
Douglas R. Gulling
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Falcon Natural Gas Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Fred B. Zaziski, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Fred B. Zaziski
-----------------------------------------
Name: Fred B. Zaziski
Title: Principal Executive Officer
Date: November 17, 2006
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JUSTIN CHISM
, Appellant,

v.

MATTHEW LEE SEACRIST, Individually, TRANSDEV SERVICES, INC., a Foreign Profit Corporation, and VEOLIA TRANSPORTATION MAINTENANCE AND INFRASTRUCTURE, INC., a Foreign Profit Corporation

,

Appellee s

.

No. 4D 17

- 2773

[ November 1, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County ; Laurie E. Buchanan , Judge; L.T. Case No.

16000322CAAXMX

.

Maaz Quraishi and Ashley Eagle of the Law Office of Maaz Quraishi, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Mark Hicks of Hicks, Porter, Ebenfeld & Stein, P.A., and Johnny

White of Pozo

- Diaz & Pozo, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellees.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN
, K LINGENSMITH
, JJ., and K ANNER
, D ANIEL J. , Associate Judge,

concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 09-7795.

#### Terry Self, Petitioner v. Devon Energy Production Company, LP.

559 U.S. 942, 130 S. Ct. 1508,

176 L. Ed. 2d 119,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1382,

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, denied.
No. 09-9064.

#### Tony Dejuan Jackson, Petitioner v. Minnesota.

559 U.S. 1035, 130 S. Ct. 2085,

176 L. Ed. 2d 413,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2850.

March 29, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305, and cases cited therein.
5 June 2020 ************************

NSN: 8925-01-426-1373 (PCDO) MONOGRAPH NO. M8O4

 *************************

Item: Pan coated candy, Disks, Fruit flavored, Original (Type IV, Style A, Flavor 2, Flavor

Style a)

Document: CID A-A-20177F, Candy and Chocolate Confections and PKG & QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 250 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

The pan coated candy shall have a candy shell with a high gloss and the colors shall be 

vibrant (high chroma) and uniform (not mottled) in hue. Disks shall resemble a double 

convex lens in shape. The candy shall consist of five various fruit colors.

Odor: Sweet, fruity odor of the five following odors: lime, grape, lemon, orange, and 

strawberry.

Flavor: Sweet, fruity flavor of the five following flavors: lime, grape, lemon, orange, and 

strawberry.

Texture: Hard exterior candy shell with a firm chewy center.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Cracked candy shell, mottling and dulling of color, interior darkening.

Odor: Off odors, heat stressed.

Flavor: Burnt, caramelized sugars.

Texture: Moderate hardening of center, brittle center, hardening to the point of causing 

discomfort to the user.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

NA
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1394 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 16 ) ll-B-1 1 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/3/20087:22:10AM

Sheet 16 of 57P. 2

A-94-5 2 II-B-1 1 10/15/9 6 Docke t No . A-94-5 2 Categor y II- B Th e followin g informatio n i s locate di n th e confidential files ofth e Director , Emissio n Standard s Division , Offic e o f Ai r Quality Plannin g an dStandards , U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort hCarolin a27711 . Thi s informatio n i s confidentia l pendin g final determinatio n b y th e Administrato r an di s no t

availabl e for

publi c inspection . 10/15/9 6 K . Meardon , PES , t o M . Strum , EPA:OAQPS:CCPG , Site Visi t report for 7/9/9 6 visi t t o Ft . Worth , T X Endur o Plastics , Ft . Worth , TX 1 diskette, 1 Sit e Visi t Report ; 1 6 pp . CN-N404- 8



### •sf^^l