alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed, September 26, 2012

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 12

- 00860

- CV

____________
DONALD RAY MCCRAY , Appellant

V.

PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE , DOUGLAS D. MULDER, MICHELLE MULDER, ANNE ASHBY, KENNETH HOLT, DEANA R. DA VID AND DARRYL E. GLENN , Appellee

On Appeal from the 240th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 12

- DCV

- 196144



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due August 31, 2012

. See Tex. R. App. P.

35.1. The court has not rec eived a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed
timely, we issue the following order.

We order Elizabeth Wittu , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

.
PER CURIAM
No. 09-9369.

#### In re Hubert Warren, Petitioner.

559 U.S. 1105, 130 S. Ct. 2408,

176 L. Ed. 2d 942,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3806.

May 3, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bullion River Gold Corp. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
Report"), I, Tim Callaway, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.


                                     BULLION RIVER GOLD CORP.


Dated:   May 20, 2008                By:  /s/ Tim Callaway
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Tim Callaway
                                          Chief Executive Officer and Director


                                          --------------------------------------
No. 09-1062.

#### Sarah Greaves, Petitioner v. Lisa Massad.

560 U.S. 904, 130 S. Ct. 3276,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1183,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4048.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Appellate Court of Connecticut denied.

Same case below, 116 Conn. App. 672, 977 A.2d 662.
**Exhibit 99.1**

**Certification of PrincipalExecutive Officer and****Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. 1350**

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Anthony & Sylvan Pools Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Stuart D. Neidus, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|                                                               |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ STUART D. NEIDUS                                               |   |   |        |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |
| **Stuart D. Neidus****Chief Executive Officer**Dated: May 15, 2003 |   |   |   |

 

17
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6411

ALFRED GEE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DENNIS BIDWELL, Warden; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA97-232-PJM)

Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 17, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alfred Gee, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gee

v. Bidwell, No. CA-97-232-PJM (D. Md. Feb. 10, 1997). We dismiss as

moot Appellant's motion to expedite and dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5103 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 5103

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 27, 2006

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To provide for the conveyance of the former Konnarock Lutheran Girls 
   School in Smyth County, Virginia, which is currently owned by the 
United States and administered by the Forest Service, to facilitate the 
     restoration and reuse of the property, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, FORMER KONNAROCK LUTHERAN GIRLS SCHOOL, 
              JEFFERSON NATIONAL FOREST, SMYTH COUNTY, VIRGINIA.

    (a) Conveyance Required.--The Secretary of Agriculture shall 
convey, without consideration, to the Evangelical Lutheran Coalition 
for Mission in Appalachia (in this section referred to as the 
``recipient'') all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
and to a parcel of real property in the Mount Rogers National 
Recreation Area, Smyth County, Virginia, located in the vicinity of the 
junction of Virginia Routes 600 and 603, consisting of not more than 
six acres, and containing the former Konnarock Lutheran Girls School 
and its outbuildings, as depicted on the map entitled ``Proposed Area 
for New Legislation or Sale-Konnarock School-Being a Portion of USA 
Tract J-935''.
    (b) Condition of Conveyance.--The conveyance under subsection (a) 
shall be subject to the condition that the recipient accept the real 
property described in such subsection in its condition at the time of 
the conveyance, commonly known as conveyance ``as is''.
    (c) Description of Property.--Subject to the acreage limitation 
specified in subsection (a), the exact acreage and legal description of 
the real property to be conveyed under such subsection shall be 
determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary. The cost of the 
survey shall be borne by the recipient.
    (d) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require 
such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance 
under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect 
the interests of the United States.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 26, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. 09-9619.

#### Michael McNeill, Petitioner v. Lanesboro Correctional Administration Staff.

560 U.S. 910, 130 S. Ct. 3288,

176 L. Ed. 2d 1194,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 4071.

May 17, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
STATE v. Flint Fitzgerald JOHNSON, Jr.

382P18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2019

Flint Fitzgerald Johnson, Jr., for Johnson, Flint Fitzgerald (Jr.).

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina *252The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of November 2018 by Defendant for Appellant Brief:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."

Ervin, J. recused
Filed 2/11/15 P. v. Gray CA2/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

STANLEY GRAY,

Defendant and Appellant. B259582

(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NA094864)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mark C. Kim, Judge. Dismissed. Murray A. Rosenberg, under appointmen t by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.2 Defendant, Stanley Gray, purp orts to appeal from a drug conviction. On May 9, 2014, defendant pled guilty to a drug charge. Defendant’s probable cause certificate issuance request was denied. We have a duty to raise issues concerning our jurisdiction on our own motion. ( Jennings v. Marralle (1994) 8 Cal.4th 121, 126; Olson v. Cory (1983) 35 Cal.3d 390, 398.) Thus, we issued an order to show cause concerning possible dismissal of the appeal and placed the matte r on calendar. Defendant has failed to fully and timely comply with both Penal Code section 1237.5 and California Rules of Court, rule 8.304(b). ( In re Chavez (2003) 30 Cal.4th 643, 651; People v. Mendez (1999) 19 Cal.4th 1084, 1099; People v. Way (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 733, 736.) Without a probable cause certificate, defendant cannot appeal. ( People v. Kaanehe (1977) 19 Cal.3d 1, 8; People v. Ribero (1971) 4 Cal.3d 55, 61; People v. West (1970) 3 Cal.3d 595, 600-601; People v. Ward (1967) 66 Cal.2d 571, 574-576.) The appeal is dismissed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

TURNER, P. J.

We concur:

KRIEGLER, J.

GOODMAN, J. *

* Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.
No. 09-8976.

#### Elizabeth McCray, Petitioner v. Francis Howell School District, et al.

559 U.S. 1117, 130 S. Ct. 2431,

176 L. Ed. 2d 945,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3828.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 1019, 130 S. Ct. 1914, 176 L. Ed. 2d 387, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 2495.
No. 09-9023.

#### Darnell Lloyd, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.

559 U.S. 1073, 130 S. Ct. 2101,

176 L. Ed. 2d 732,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3320.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office, denied.

Same case below, 929 A.2d 242.
No. 09-8258.

#### Dorian W. Richardson, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 952, 130 S. Ct. 1538,

176 L. Ed. 2d 134,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1129.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 581 F.3d 824.
No. 09-9583.

#### Richard Allen Allen, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1081, 130 S. Ct. 2122,

176 L. Ed. 2d 746,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3234.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# C_2017262EN.01000101.xml

| 10.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8358 — Macquarie/National Grid/Gas Distribution Business of National Grid)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 262/01)

On 16 March 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8358. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8358. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 497 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 497

     To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
  Facilities Act to increase the ceiling on the Federal share of the 
   costs of phase I of the Orange County, California, Regional Water 
                          Reclamation Project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2005

Ms. Loretta Sanchez of California introduced the following bill; which 
               was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
  Facilities Act to increase the ceiling on the Federal share of the 
   costs of phase I of the Orange County, California, Regional Water 
                          Reclamation Project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN CEILING ON FEDERAL SHARE OF WATER RECLAMATION 
              PROJECT.

    Section 1631(d) of the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study 
and Facilities Act (43 U.S.C. 390h-13(d)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ``paragraph (2)'' and 
        inserting ``paragraphs (2) and (3)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) The Federal share of the costs of the project 
        authorized by section 1624 shall not exceed $80,000,000.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee on behalf of Government Trust 1-D (the Trust), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Trusts
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



/s/ Lawrence M. KuschName:

Lawrence M. KuschTitle:

Assistant Vice President


September 26, 2008
No. 09-9882.

#### Winston Douglas Syndab, aka Winston Nelson, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1112, 130 S. Ct. 2419,

176 L. Ed. 2d 934,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3755.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 348 Fed. Appx. 852.
No. 07-1489.

#### Trainer Wortham & Company, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Heide Betz.

559 U.S. 1103, 130 S. Ct. 2400,

176 L. Ed. 2d 920,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3749.

May 3, 2010.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petition for writ to certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Merck & Co. v. Reynolds, 559 U.S. 633, 130 S. Ct. 1784, 176 L. Ed. 2d 582 (2010).

Same case below, 519 F.3d 863.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

GORDON D. FISHER,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2760 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 

File No. C-4-19-503 

Attorney Registration No. 1207 

(Allegheny County) 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of December, 2020, upon consideration of the 

Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board Member dated December 2, 2020, 

Respondent’s Petition to Dissolve Order of Temporary Suspension is denied without 

prejudice.

Justice Wecht did not participate in this matter.
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 22
- 00113
- C R

__________________ IKEAL WADE GARDINER , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 1A District Court Jasper County, Texas Trial Cause No. 14049JD

__________________________________________________________________ ORDER The clerk’s record was filed on April 1 2 , 2022, and the reporter’s record was filed on November 1 4 , 2022. On August 10, 2022, William Stephen Shires substituted as retained counsel for appellant Ikeal Wade Gardiner. On Dec ember 1 4 , 2022, the Court granted an extension of time to file the brief

. O n January 17, 2023,

we notified the parties that neither the brief nor a motion for an extension of time had been filed, and we warned that unless we received the brief by January 27, 2023 ,2 we would order the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why no brief has been filed. As of this date the brief has not been filed. We abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court to con duct a hearing at which a representative of the State, counsel for the appellant, and the appellant shall be present. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3). We direct the trial court to determine whether or not a ppellant desires to pursue his appeal. If appellant desires to pursue his appeal, we direct the trial court to determine why the brief of the appellant has not been filed , why a ppellant’s counsel has not responded to the late notice from this
Court , and whether good cause exists to determi ne that r etained counsel, William Stephen Shires, has abandoned the appeal . If the trial court determines that counsel has abandoned the appeal , t he trial court shall determine whether the appellant is indigent and whether counsel should be appointed for the appeal

. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.04(j)(2). The record of the hearing, including any orders and findings of the trial court judge, shall be sent to the appellate court for filing. The transcription of the court reporter’s notes from the hearing and the recommendations of the trial court judge
are to be filed on or before March 10 , 2023.
ORDER ENTERED February 8 , 202 3

. PER CURIAM Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Wright, JJ.
No. 09-1002.

#### David Michael Davis, Petitioner v. Minnesota.

559 U.S. 1069, 130 S. Ct. 2111,

176 L. Ed. 2d 725,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3447.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Minnesota denied.

Same case below, 773 N.W.2d 66.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00064

- CV

QuikTrip Corporation

v.

Glenn Goodwin, Individually and on

Behalf of the Estate of Melanie
Therese Goodwin, and Peggy

Goodwin, Individually and on Behalf

of the Estate of Melani e Therese

Goodwin §

§

§

§ From the 393rd District Court

o f Denton County (2009

- 60224

- 393 )

November 13, 2014

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston



### JUDGMENT

This court h as considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the

trial court is reversed

, and we render a take

- nothing judgment for QuikTrip

Corporation.

It is further ord ered that appellees Glenn Goodwin and Peggy Goodwin

shall pay all of the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

C hief Justice Terrie Livingston
No. 09-9934.

#### Thomas Govan, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1114, 130 S. Ct. 2422,

176 L. Ed. 2d 936,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3713.

May 3, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 71.
No. 09-8266.

#### Ruben Ramirez Cardenas, Petitioner v. Texas.

559 U.S. 1072, 130 S. Ct. 2094,

176 L. Ed. 2d 729,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3303.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
No. 09-8275.

#### Daniel Anthony Lucas, Petitioner v. Stephen Upton, Warden.

559 U.S. 979, 130 S. Ct. 1703,

176 L. Ed. 2d 193,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2049.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of ING Life
Insurance and Annuity Company (the "Company") hereby certifies that, to the
officer's knowledge, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date   March 25, 2004                By  /s/ David A. Wheat
       --------------                    ------------------
                                         David A. Wheat
                                         Director, Senior Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer

                                       77