alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.36**

 

 

December 22, 2010

 

Directed Services LLC

1475 Dunwoody Drive

West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380

 

Dear Ms. Hughes:

 

**Re:   Termination of Service Agreement**

 

We refer to the service agreement effective January 1, 1994, as amended by a first amendment effective March 7, 1995 and a second amendment effective July 31, 2007 (collectively, the “Service Agreement”). The purpose of this letter is to confirm our mutual agreement to terminate the Service Agreement effective January 1, 2010.

 

Please confirm that Directed Services LLC has agreed to the foregoing termination of the Service Agreement.

Please evidence your agreement by signing a copy of this letter where indicated below and returning it to us

immediately.

 

Sincerely,

 

 
| **ING USA ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY** |
|------------------------------------------------|
| ** **                                     |   |
| ** **                                     |   |
| ** **                                     |   |
| By: /s/                                        | Thomas N. Hanson |   |
|                                           | Thomas N. Hanson |
|                                           | Vice President and   Actuary |         Agreed   to on December 22, 2010 |
|                                           |   |   |
|                                           |   |   |
| **DIRECTED SERVICES LLC**                      |
| ** **                                     |   |   |
| ** **                                     |   |   |
| ** **                                     |   |   |
| By: /s/                                        | Spencer T. Shell |   |
| ** **                                     | Spencer T. Shell |
| ** **                                     | Vice President and Assistant |
| ** **                                     | Treasurer |   |
|                                                |  |  |  |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4418]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM08-2-000]


Pipeline Posting Requirements Under Section 23 of the Natural Gas 
Act; Notice of Technical Conference

February 24, 2009.
    Take notice that on March 18, 2008, a technical conference will be 
convened to consider certain issues related to Order No. 720.\1\ The 
technical conference will be held in the Commission Meeting Room (Room 
2C) at the headquarters of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC, from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. (EDT).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Pipeline Posting Requirements under Section 23 of the 
Natural Gas Act, Order No. 720, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,281 (2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On November 20, 2008, the Commission issued Order No. 720, Pipeline 
Posting Requirements under Section 23 of the Natural Gas Act. The Final 
Rule, among other things, requires major non-interstate pipelines to 
post scheduled flow information and to post information for each 
receipt and delivery point with a design capacity greater than 15,000 
MMBtu per day. The topics for discussion are: (1) The definition of 
major non-interstate pipelines; (2) what constitutes ``scheduling'' for 
a receipt or delivery point; and (3) how the 15,000 MMBtu per day 
design capacity threshold should be applied. The technical conference 
will be organized around these three topics. An agenda for the 
conference will be issued in a later notice.
    This technical conference will be transcribed. Transcripts will be 
available immediately for a fee from Ace Reporting Company (202-347-
3700 or 1-800-336-6646). For additional information, please contact 
Saida Shaalan of FERC's Office of Enforcement at (202) 502-8278 or by 
e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4615272f222768152e27272a2728062023342568212930"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b6e5d7dfd2d798e5ded7d7dad7d8f6d0d3c4d598d1d9c0">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Commission conferences and meetings are accessible under section 
508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations 
please send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#204143434553534942494c49545960464552430e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cdacaeaea8bebea4afa4a1a4b9b48daba8bfaee3aaa2bb">[email protected]</span></a> or call toll free (866) 
208-3372 (voice) or 202-502-8659 (TTY), or send a fax to 202-208-2106 
with the required accommodations.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-4418 Filed 3-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
(1) Adjusting Price 18.66 CWT

(2) Base Price 13.52 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT 5.14

(4) Price change per gallon 0.44

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon 0.22

Price change per quart 0.11 

Price change per pint 0.06

Price change per 12-oz pg. 0.04

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) 0.03

Price change per half pint 0.03

(6) Price adjustment per gallon 0.44

Price adjustment per half gallon 0.22

Price adjustment per quart 0.11

Price adjustment per pint 0.06

Price change per 12-oz pg. 0.04

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) 0.03

Price adjustment per half pint 0.03

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Marketing Area Federal Milk Order #51

 Effective Date: July 5, 2020
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alion Science and Technology Corporation (the“Corporation”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John M. Hughes, Chief Financial Officerof the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.       Date: May 15, 2006               By:/s/ John M. Hughes    Name: John M. Hughes    Title: Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 23.3**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our report dated March 23, 2018, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of NorthStar Real Estate Income Trust, Inc.attached as an exhibit to the Annual Report of Colony NorthStar Credit Real Estate, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. We consent to the incorporation by reference of said report inthe Registration Statement of Colony NorthStar Credit Real Estate, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-222812).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

New York, New York 

March 23, 2018
H. R. 4674

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and six 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 110 North 

Chestnut Street in Olathe, Kansas, as the ‘‘Governor John Anderson, Jr. Post 

Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

110 North Chestnut Street in Olathe, Kansas, shall be known 

and designated as the ‘‘Governor John Anderson, Jr. Post Office 

Building’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Governor 

John Anderson, Jr. Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-5086

CHRISTOPHER J. GRUSH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in 07-CV-232,

Judge Edward J. Damich.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The United States moves without opposition to stay the briefing schedule in this

appeal pending disposition of Easter v. United States 2008-5187, and Forbes v. United

States 2009-5030.

The United States asserts that this appeal and Easter and Forbes all involve the

issue of whether the Court of Federal Claims correctly decided that the appellants were

not entitled to overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et

seq. for time spent driving a government vehicle between home and work. The United

States asserts that the court's decision in Easter and Forbes may resolve the overtime

pay issues in this case.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion is granted. The United States is directed to notify this court within 21

days of the date both mandates have issued in Easter and Forbes concerning how they

believe this appeal should proceed. The appellant may also respond within that time.

FOR THE COURT

JUL 24 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

Date

cc:	Jules Bernstein, Esq.

Shalom Brilliant, Esq.

s20 ILED U.S. COURT

F

OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

JUL 2 4 2009

JAW Hummel'

CLERK

2009-5086	 2
No. 11-519.

#### David E. Conwill, Petitioner v. Mississippi.

565 U.S. 1186, 132 S. Ct. 1163,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 952.

181 L. Ed. 2d 1032,

January 23, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 1080, 132 S. Ct. 826, 181 L. Ed. 2d 527, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8728.
No. 09-8649.

#### Barron Wimbley, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 961, 130 S. Ct. 1685,

176 L. Ed. 2d 150,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1269.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 349 Fed. Appx. 54.
No. 09-8736.

#### Clarence Scott, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1015, 130 S. Ct. 1903,

176 L. Ed. 2d 380,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2653.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Hg data

12/07/2011 03:48 PM

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Hi Bob,

Is there a field in the attached spreadsheet that indicates if a unit was part of the best performing 15% or one of the randomly selected units from the ICR? If not, do you have a list of those facilities (preferably including the Facility ID)?

Also, the sheet for the existing not-low BTU Hg coal floor indicates that 4 units were considered outliers for setting the floors. What were the 4 outliers? How were they selected? – it’s difficult to understand the Gross Outlier test in the floor spreadsheet (which it seems is based on the maximum value for the floors being 100 times great than the minimum

value, but I’m not sure).

Regards,

Cortney

Partii_iii_hg.xls
##### 



Exhibit 23 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements Form S-8 pertaining to the 2002
Omnibus Incentive Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Registration
No. 333-96547), Form S-3 pertaining to the registration
of $1.0 billion of debt securities
(Registration No. 333-67943),
Form S-8
pertaining to the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (Registration No. 333-40575),
Form S-8
pertaining to the Deferred Compensation Plan
(Registration No. 333-75492),
Form S-8 pertaining to the Supplemental
Compensation Plan for Outside Directors (Registration No.
333-109562) and Forms S-8 pertaining to the Stock
Incentive Plan (Registration Nos. 333-65252 and 033-63007)
of American Standard Companies Inc.,  of our reports dated February 23, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of American Standard Companies Inc., American Standard Companies Inc. management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of American Standard Companies Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004. New York, NY
February 23, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4930 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4930

To amend title 49, United States Code, to clarify that State and local 
    permitting requirements relating to the processing, sorting, or 
          transporting of solid waste apply to rail carriers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2006

  Mr. Saxton (for himself and Mr. LoBiondo) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 49, United States Code, to clarify that State and local 
    permitting requirements relating to the processing, sorting, or 
          transporting of solid waste apply to rail carriers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY OF PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS TO RAIL CARRIERS.

    Section 10501 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(d) Nothing in this part shall be construed to exempt a rail 
carrier from State or local permitting requirements relating to the 
processing, sorting, or transporting of solid waste.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2016417EN.01000901.xml

| 11.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 417/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 417/9

---

EUROPEAN RESEARCH COUNCIL EXECUTIVE AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2015

(2016/C 417/32)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://erc.europa.eu/document-library?category_radio=426

---
No. 09-8743.

#### Miguel Vega-Cosme, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 985, 130 S. Ct. 1721,

176 L. Ed. 2d 202,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1970.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
% Food exposure

% Once daily oral exposure, dose from cpfs SS F13_49 foodonly exp distribution.csv 70th percentile

% Female adult, Body weight set to 72.9 kg

% Cecilia Tan

% August 26, 2015

prepare @clear @all

% Setting model parameters

start @NoCallback

use human_parameters_MRP

use preg_female_parameters

BWSW=1;% Set to 1 if BWT is provided

BWST=72.9;% Initial BW in kg

PREG=0;% Not pregnant

TSTOP= 1008; % Exposure duration in hrs

%Single daily oral exposure

DT = xlsRead("Food.xls", "70p", "A1:A43"); % Dosing Times

DORAL=xlsRead("Food.xls", "70p", "B1:B43"); % Dose in ug/kg

prepare time rbcce cv urinetcpy

start@nocallback

mytable = [_time _rbcce _urinetcpy _cv*350.6];%unit of conc = ug/L

save mytable @file='food_70.txt' @format=ascii
No. 09-8667.

#### Dale D. Godown, Petitioner v. John C. Marshall, Warden.

559 U.S. 1014, 130 S. Ct. 1899,

176 L. Ed. 2d 377,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2704.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-*378tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 329 Fed. Appx. 140.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          I, Donald J. Carter, Jr., as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Home Interiors & Gifts, Inc., (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:

          (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending September
30, 2002 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  November 12, 2002

                                            /s/ DONALD J. CARTER, JR.
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Donald J. Carter, Jr.
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4744 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic in Tulsa, 

Oklahoma, as the Ernest Childers Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2006 

Mr. SULLIVAN (for himself, Mr. LUCAS, Mr. COLE of Oklahoma, Mr. BOREN, 

and Mr. ISTOOK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 

Clinic in Tulsa, Oklahoma, as the Ernest Childers Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ERNEST CHILDERS DEPART4 MENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT 

5 CLINIC. 

6 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Department of Veterans Af7 fairs Outpatient Clinic in Tulsa, Oklahoma, shall after the 

8 date of the enactment of this Act be known and designated 
2 

•HR 4744 IH 

1 as the ‘‘Ernest Childers Department of Veterans Affairs 

2 Outpatient Clinic’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula4 tion, map, document, record, or other paper of the United 

5 States to the outpatient clinic referred to in subsection 

6 (a) shall be considered to be a reference to the Ernest 

7 Childers Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clin8 ic. 

Æ
************************* 

 * MONOGRAPH NO: 3A14 

 ************************* 

ITEM: Lemon Crunch Cake, Shelf Stable (LCC) SECONDARY 

 

NSN: 8920 01 518 9519 ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR-C-024 Poly Tray (UGR) 

 

 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM 

Appearance: Bright yellow, moist dense cake with a uniform crumb and a bright yellow 

crumbly topping 

Odor: Sweet lemon 

Flavor: Predominantly slightly sweet and slightly tart; mild lemon flavor also present with a 

slight cooked white wheat flour note 

Texture: Moderately moist slightly dense cake with a soft crumb and a slightly crunchy 

crystalline topping 

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36m 

 100 DEGREES F: 6m 

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES 

Appearance: Darkened cake and topping; tan colored melted crumb topping and browned 

cake 

Odor: Loss of lemon odor or stale, rancid, burnt, caramelized, or acidic odors 

Flavor: Burnt or caramelized, stale, rancid, bitter, sour, or loss of lemon flavor 

Texture: Stale, dry, crumbly, gummy topping or crumb 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None
No. 09-9182.

#### Michael Sanders, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1023, 130 S. Ct. 1927,

176 L. Ed. 2d 395,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2473.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
No. 09-8596.

#### Charles Lee Webb, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 983, 130 S. Ct. 1713,

176 L. Ed. 2d 198,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2119.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 09-796.

#### Michael Neuman, Petitioner v. California.

559 U.S. 973, 130 S. Ct. 1707,

176 L. Ed. 2d 184,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2026.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, denied.

Same case below, 176 Cal. App. 4th 571, 97 Cal. Rptr. 3d 715.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40716 Conference Calendar

JEFFREY D. NOIEL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus HARRY W. MCKEE, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:96-CV-299

- - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jeffrey D. Noiel, Texas prisoner # 495518, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights complaint as frivolous. He has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. The motion for leave to appeal IFP is GRANTED. Noiel is not required to pay an initial partial filing fee; however, he shall make monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month’s income credited to his account. See 28 U.S.C.No. 96-40716 - 2 - § 1915(a). The agency having custody of Noiel is directed to forward payments from his prisoner account to the clerk of the district court each time the amount in his account exceeds $10 until the filing fee is paid. See id

. Noiel filed his complaint against Magistrate Judge Harry W. McKee. Judicial officers such as Magistrate Judge McKee are entitled to absolute immunity from damage claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 arising out of acts performed in the exercise of their judicial functions. Graves v. Hampton , 1 F.3d 315, 317 (5th Cir. 1993). Noiel’s appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous.
See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d. 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Noiel now “has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Accordingly, Noiel is barred from proceeding IFP in a civil action unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. Id.
APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTION IMPOSED.