alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC NOTICE Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Request for Public Comments On Exceptional Events in Yuma

In 2005, Congress identified a need to account for events that result in exceedances of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) that are exceptional in nature (e.g., not expected to reoccur or caused by acts of nature beyond man-made controls.) In response, EPA promulgated the Exceptional Events Rule (EER) to address exceptional
events in 40 CFR Parts 50 and 51 on March 22, 2007 (72 FR 13560). On May 2, 2011, EPA released draft guidance documents on the imp lementation of the EER to State, tribal and local air agencies for review. The EER a llows for states and tribes to “flag” air quality monitoring data as an exceptional ev ent, and therefore exclude these data from consideration in air quality planning, if EPA concurs with the demonstration submitted by the flagging agency that all procedural a nd technical requirements have been met. Pursuant to 40 CFR 50.14(c)(3)(i), the Ariz ona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) is soliciting comments on its final de monstration of an event that has caused
elevated concentrations of PM 10 in Yuma on July 3, 2011 a nd ADEQ’s decision to flag this episode based on this analysis. A copy of th e demonstration titled State of Arizona Exceptional Event Documentation for the Ev ent of July 3, 2011, for the Yuma County

PM 10 Nonattainment Area can be viewed online begi nning Monday, December 3, 2012 on the ADEQ website at http:// www.azdeq.gov/environ/air/plan/ index.html by selecting Air Quality – Public Notices, Meetings and Hearings. Interested parties can submit written comments throughout the comment period which will end at 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 1, 2013. Any comments receive d will be responded to and forwarded to
EPA with the final demonstration.

Written comments should be addressed, faxed, or e-mailed to: Andra Juniel, Air Assessment Section, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, 1110 W. Washington Street, 3415-A, P hoenix, AZ 85007, PHONE: (602) 771-4417; FAX: (602) 771-2366, E-mail: juniel.andra@azdeq.gov.

In addition to being available on-line, a copy of the analysis is available for review at the following locations:

ADEQ Records Management Center, 1110 W. Washington St., Phoenix, AZ, 85007, Attn: Records Center, (602) 771-4380, email: recordscenter@azdeq.gov

.

Yuma County Library, Reference Section, 2951 S. 21 st Dr., Yuma, Arizona 85364, Attn: Brian Franssen, (928) 782-1871, E-mail: bfranssen@yumalibrary.org

.

Persons with a disability may request r easonable accommodations by contacting Linda Morrison at (602) 771-4793 or 1-800-234- 5677 ext. 771-4793. This document is available in alternative formats by cont acting ADEQ TDD phone number at (602) 771-
4829.
NO. 07-05-0387-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

FEBRUARY 15, 2006

______________________________

DOUGLAS D. COX,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 140th DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2005-409,333; HON. JIM BOB DARNELL, PRESIDING

_______________________________

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Douglas D. Cox appeals his conviction for theft from a person 65 or over, enhanced.

The clerk’s record was filed on January 11, 2006. The reporter’s record was due on

January 26, 2006. On January 30, 2006, court reporter Charles Hanshew filed a request

for extension, which the trial court granted to February 15, 2006 for his portion of the

record. Hanshew also notified this Court that two other reporters, Teri Finney and Linda

Reeves, did the majority of the trial. On February 3, 2006, reporters Finney and Reeves
2

were notified by letter that their records were due and they were to complete and return the

status form no later than Monday, February 13, 2006. No form, extension motion, or

record has been received by either reporter.

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 140th District Court

of Lubbock County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall

immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to

determine the following:

1. why Finney and Reeves have not filed their portions of the reporter’s record;

and, 

2. when the reporter’s record can reasonably be filed in a manner that

does not have the practical effect of depriving the appellant of his right

to appeal or of delaying the resolution of this appeal. 

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too shall it 1) execute

findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be

developed a supplemental clerk’s record containing its findings of fact and conclusions of

law and all orders it may issue as a result of its hearing in this matter, and 3) cause to be

developed a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the

aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the district court shall then file the supplemental

record and reporter’s record transcribing the hearing with the clerk of this court on or before

March 17, 2006. Should further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks,

then same must be requested before March 17, 2006.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 10 (xiii)

                        AMERICAN STANDARD COMPANIES INC.

                              STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

                                    ADDENDUM

                                     FRANCE

Options may be granted under this Addendum to Participants based in France as
follows:

1)      Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, options granted to any
        Participant holding shares representing 10% or more of the Company's
        capital will not be deemed to have been granted pursuant to this
        Addendum.

2)      Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, any option whose
        exercise price at the time of the grant of the option is less than 80%
        of the arithmetical average of the market value of a share on the 20
        daily sessions next preceding the related date of grant, rounded up,
        shall not be deemed to have been granted under this Addendum.

3)      Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, the maximum delay to
        grant options relating to shares that will not be repurchased by the
        Company is 5 years after the date of the Company shareholders meeting
        which authorized the grant of options under the Plan.

4)      Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Plan, the exercise price of
        an option shall be adjusted only upon the occurrence of the events
        specified under the July 24, 1966 corporate law - section 208-5 in
        accordance with French law.

5)      Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, upon the death of a
        French Participant, to the extent an option was exercisable by such
        Participant at the date of death, all such options shall remain
        exercisable for a period of six months from the date of the French
        participant's death.



                                       1
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Form S-8 registration
statements of the Oryx Energy Company Long-Term Incentive Plan (File No.
33-25032), the Oryx Energy Company Capital Accumulation Plan (File No.
33-24918), the Oryx Energy Company 1992 Long-Term Incentive Plan (File No.
33-42695), the Oryx Energy Company Equity and Deferred Compensation Plan for
Non-Employee Directors (File No. 333-03075), the Oryx Energy Company Executive
Variable Incentive Plan (File No. 333-03089) and the Form S-3 registration
statements of Oryx Energy Company (File No.'s 33-33361, 33-36799 and 33-45611),
of our report dated February 19, 1997, on our audit of the consolidated
financial statements of Oryx Energy Company and its Subsidiaries as of December
31, 1996 and 1995 and for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 1996, which report is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K from page
41 of the Oryx Energy Company 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders.
 
                                              /s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
 
Dallas, Texas
March 20, 1997
******************************** 

 * MONOGRAPH NO.: MCW/LRP 24 

 ********************************* 

ITEM: Crackers, Soda, Salted, Approx 4 Inch Square, partially scored but nut separated, 2/bag, Flex and 

Vac Pkg., Type I 

NSN: 8920-00-149-0795 (CSS) ITEM SPECIFICATION: MIL-C-44112 

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE: 196-203 Kilocalories (PRIMARY) 

 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM: 

APPEARANCE: Square, evenly baked to light golden color except for edges that may be light to dark 

brown. Surface contains numerous perforations (called docker holes). Surface may or may not have salt 

evident (see Special Notes). 

ODOR: Very slightly toasted cracker. Yeast-like odor is often noticeable. 

FLAVOR: Ranges from a salty cracker to bland cracker. Yeast-like flavor is often noticeable. 

TEXTURE: Dry, flaky to crumbly. 

DEFECTS LIKELY TO OCCUR: 

APPEARANCE: Darkened (but not due to over baking at origin). 

ODOR: Stale, cardboard, rancid. 

FLAVOR: Stale, musty, bitter, rancid. 

TEXTURE: Excessively dry and crumbly. 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: When package is first opened the product should be 

srrielled for off-odors. Odors that dissipate rapidly (e.g., musty, yeasty, slightly rancid) should be noted but, 

not scored as a surveillance defect provided no other condition factor such as off-taste is also noted. 

SPECIAL NOTES: Crackers from 1984 rations will probably be in square solid sheets and consistently 

exhibit a darker than normal color; however, the overall organoleptic qualities should not be affected by this 

factor. In 1986 and later, topping salt was not used, and the salt was mixed into the cracker dough to 

preclude it from puncturing the pouch. 

In earlier years, topping salt of various sizes and shapes was used and it was suspected of causing punctures 

or wear holes in the package. Serviceability of the cracker is considered significantly affected when more 

than 25% of the product's volume is crushed or reduced to crumbs. This item is vacuum packaged but' does 

not contain an inner liner. The flavor, odor, and texture is similar to, but not exactly like a saltine soda 

cracker. The sealed bag shall continue to exhibit tight adherence to the large flat surfaces of the contents 

when a pulling force is applied at the center of each side seal. This force shall be applied by holding each side 

seal between thumb and forefinger of each hand, simultaneously exerting a slight pull with both hands.
24 May 2007 ***************************** 

NSN: 8925-01-523-4997

 8925-00-680-0708

(CGWC) * MONOGRAPH NO: M9M1

*****************************

 Item: Chewing Gum, Tablet, Regular, Without Caffeine, Xylitol Sweetened, Peppermint or 

Cinnamon (Type I, Size B, Style (1) Class 3, Flavor a or c) 

Document: CID A-A-20175 Chewing Gum and PKG & QAP 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 0 Component Classification: Ancillary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80o

F 

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Candy Coating: Free from pits, cracks, and the appearance of discoloration, and covers 

center completely. 

Odor: NA

Flavor: As Specified. 

Texture: Not sticky, grainy, flabby, or stringy. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Dry. 

Odor: Any objectionable non-typical odor. 

Flavor: Any objectionable non-typical flavor or lack of flavor. 

Texture: Sticky, grainy, stringy, and extremely hardened. Cannot be chewed without discomfort; 

will not form a typical gum texture when chewed. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

When examining for flavor, one tablet should provide an immediate release of flavor that should last 

for approximately 20 minutes. 

Special Notes

NA
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Vincent Nicastro, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>Charles Zerilli, Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Richmond County (Theresa M. Ciccotto, J.), entered July 17, 2014. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the action.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>In this small claims action, plaintiff seeks to recover damages in the sum of $4,900 claimed to have resulted from the imposition upon plaintiff of fines for certain violations of the Administrative Code of the City of New York due to defendant's dumping of automobiles, trailers and other debris upon plaintiff's property. At a nonjury trial, plaintiff testified that before plaintiff purchased the property located at 2 Gordon Street, Staten Island, New York, defendant had dumped a boat, two automobiles, two trailers, pipe (plumbing and scaffolding), old boilers, bricks, blocks and wooden pallets on the property. After plaintiff purchased the property, the City of New York charged him with code violations which, he claims, stemmed from the aforementioned debris left by defendant upon the property, resulting in the imposition of fines against him totaling $4,900, which sum he has paid. Following the trial, the Civil Court dismissed the action, finding that plaintiff had failed to present prima facie evidence of the violations, and that the proof plaintiff had presented at trial related to various code violations that were unrelated to his claim against defendant. </p><p>On appeal, this court's review is limited to a determination of whether "substantial justice has . . . been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law" (CCA 1807; <i>see</i> CCA 1804; <i>Ross v Friedman</i>, 269 AD2d 584 [2000]; <i>Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d 125 [2000]). Furthermore, the determination of a trier of fact as to issues of credibility is given substantial deference, as a trial court's opportunity to observe and evaluate the testimony and demeanor of the witnesses affords it a better perspective from which to assess their credibility (<i>see Vizzari v State of New York</i>, 184 AD2d 564 [1992]; <i>Kincade v Kincade</i>, 178 AD2d 510, 511 [1991]). This deference applies with greater force to judgments rendered in the Small Claims Part of the court (<i>see Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d at 126).</p><p>Upon a review of the record, we find that plaintiff did not meet his burden of showing that the alleged violations, for which he claims to have paid $4,900 in fines, related to the debris left by defendant on plaintiff's property. Thus, the judgment provided the parties with substantial justice according to the rules and principles of substantive law (<i>see</i> CCA 1804, 1807).</p><p>Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. </p><p>Aliotta, J.P., Pesce and Solomon, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: January 06, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
No. 09-8024.

#### Herby Caillot, Petitioner v. Massachusetts.

559 U.S. 948, 130 S. Ct. 1527,

176 L. Ed. 2d 128,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1396.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts denied.

Same case below, 454 Mass. 245, 909 N.E.2d 1.
109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4647

AN ACT

To amend the USA PATRIOT ACT to extend the sunset 

of certain provisions of such Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2

•HR 4647 EH 

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE 

2 USA PATRIOT ACT. 

3 Section 224(a) of the Uniting and Strengthening 

4 America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to 

5 Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) 

6 Act of 2001 (Public Law 107–56; 115 Stat. 295) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2005’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘February 3, 2006’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 22, 

2005. 

Attest:

Clerk. 
109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4647

AN ACT

To amend the USA PATRIOT ACT to extend the 

sunset of certain provisions of such Act.
No. 11-7663.

#### George William Blood, Petitioner v. B. A. Bledsoe, Warden.

565 U.S. 1137, 132 S. Ct. 1068,

181 L. Ed. 2d 782,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 419.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 648 F.3d 203.
EXHIBIT 32





Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350








Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pinnacle Airlines Corp. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Sean E. Menke, the Chief Executive Officer, and Edward M. Christie III, the Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify that this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.








Signature
Title
Date/s/ Sean E. Menke
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 4, 2011Sean E. Menke/s/ Edward M. Christie III
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
August 4, 2011Edward M. Christie III
No. 09-8574.

#### Girish Chandra Sahu, Petitioner v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security.

559 U.S. 1012, 130 S. Ct. 1893,

176 L. Ed. 2d 374,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2599.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

*375Same case below, 321 Fed. Appx. 529.
25 September 2009 *****************************

NSN: 8940 01 545 1765 * MONOGRAPH NO: FS3-12

 (BMB) *****************************

Item: Beef, Moist Cured/Kippered, Chopped and formed, Strips, Barbeque [Variety A, Type 

II, Style a, Class 1, Flavor (c)]

Document: CID A-A-20298 Beef and Turkey Snacks, Cured and PKG & QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 75 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80o

F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Dark reddish brown to dark brown surface color with a slightly paler interior. Slightly 

uneven, slightly glossy, fibrous and leathery exterior surface.

Odor: Dried beef, salty, cured, barbeque spice and smoky.

Flavor: Dried beef, salty, cured, barbeque spice and smoky.

Texture: Firm, tender to bite, chewy, fibrous and leathery.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Very dark brown, black surface and interior color, dry interior, increased exterior 

oiliness.

Odor: Burnt beef, scorched, artificial smoke, rancid, very low barbeque odor.

Flavor: Burnt, sour, bitter, rancid, metallic, low barbeque flavor.

Texture: Mealy chew down, very soft, dry, crumbly, grainy, or very tough, firm and 

chewy/leathery.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Product shall be vacuum packed in foil.

Special Notes: 

First Strike Ration (FSR®) contains 2 servings, 1 barbeque and 1 teriyaki strip are packaged together.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4928 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4928

 To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 
   for counting expenses for nonformulary drugs against the Medicare 
   annual out-of-pocket threshold for costs for covered part D drugs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2006

Mr. Ross (for himself, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Mr. Doyle, and Mr. Berry) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
   Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 
 Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 
   for counting expenses for nonformulary drugs against the Medicare 
   annual out-of-pocket threshold for costs for covered part D drugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Doughnut Hole Assistance 
Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. COUNTING EXPENSES FOR NONFORMULARY DRUGS AGAINST THE MEDICARE 
              ANNUAL OUT-OF-POCKET THRESHOLD FOR COSTS FOR COVERED PART 
              D DRUGS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1860D-2(b)(4)(C) (42 U.S.C. 1395w-102(b)) 
is amended by striking ``, but does not include any costs incurred for 
covered part D drugs which are not included (or treated as being 
included) in the plan's formulary'' and inserting ``, and includes 
costs incurred for covered part D drugs regardless of whether the drugs 
are included (or treated as being included) in the plan's formulary''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall be 
applied as if it were included in the enactment of the Medicare 
Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public 
Law 108-173).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TCW Direct Lending VII LLC (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James G. Krause, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ James G. Krause
|Name:               |  | James G. Krause        
|Title:              |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:               |  | March 22, 2018         

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed
as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4659 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2006 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend the USA PATRIOT ACT to extend the sunset 

of certain provisions of such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 4659 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE 

2 USA PATRIOT ACT. 

3 Section 224(a) of the Uniting and Strengthening 

4 America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to 

5 Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) 

6 Act of 2001 (Public Law 107–56; 115 Stat. 295) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘February 3, 2006’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘March 10, 2006’’. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk.