alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The Secretary of Energy

Washington, DC 20585

March 21, 2024 

The Honorable Joyce L. Connery 

Chair

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 

625 Indiana NW, Suite 700 

Washington, DC 20004 

Dear Chair Connery: 

The Department of Energy (DOE) received the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 

(DNFSB) Recommendation 2023-1, Onsite Transportation Safety, on January 26, 2024, 

and later received notice that it was published in the Federal Register on February 8, 

2024. DOE is currently coordinating its review of Recommendation 2023-1 among the 

relevant offices. In accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 2286d(c)(1), DOE requests a 45-day 

extension to provide a response to the DNFSB by May 8, 2024. 

DOE is committed to a robust nuclear safety regulatory framework that ensures 

reasonable assurance of adequate protection of public and worker health and safety. A 

45-day extension will afford DOE sufficient time to assess the Recommendation and its

findings, supporting data, and analyses.

If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Gregory P. Hatchett, National Nuclear 

Security Administration Deputy Associate Administrator for Enterprise Stewardship, at 

(202) 586-6443.

Sincerely,

Jennifer Granholm 

Received by the Board 03.21.24 Received by the Board 03.21.24
# C_2016401EN.01001001.xml

| 29.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 401/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 401/10

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Establishment of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 401/07)

| Member State | United Kingdom |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | City of Derry Airport to Heathrow Airport
  City of Derry Airport to Gatwick Airport
  City of Derry Airport to Stansted Airport
  City of Derry Airport to Luton Airport
  City of Derry Airport to London City Airport
  City of Derry Airport to Southend Airport |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 26 March 2017 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligations can be obtained | John Kelpie |
| Chief Executive |
| Derry City & Strabane |
| District Council |
| 98 Stand Road |
| Derry |
| BT48 7NN |

Member State

United Kingdom

Concerned routes

City of Derry Airport to Heathrow Airport

City of Derry Airport to Gatwick Airport

City of Derry Airport to Stansted Airport

City of Derry Airport to Luton Airport

City of Derry Airport to London City Airport

City of Derry Airport to Southend Airport

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

26 March 2017

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligations can be obtained

John Kelpie

Chief Executive

Derry City & Strabane

District Council

98 Stand Road

Derry

BT48 7NN

---
20 November 2014 *********************

NSN: 8920-00-149-0795 (CFP) * MONOGRAPH M4M

 *********************

Item: Crackers, Fortified, Plain

Document: PCR-C-037, Crackers, Fortified, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 180 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Light tan to medium tan surface color with docker holes; interior crumb a paler color 

than the surface. Flat, easily separable.

Odor: Slightly toasted wheat flour.

Flavor: Salty to bland cracker flavor.

Texture: Dry, crisp.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkened but not due to overbaking.

Odor: Off-odor, stale, rancid, musty.

Flavor: Off-flavor, bitter, rancid.

Texture: Excessively dry, crumbly or hard.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

Serviceability of the cracker is considered significantly affected when more than 25% of the cracker is 

crushed or in crumbs. This product is vacuum packaged. Inspect for “inadequate vacuum” by firmly 

grasping the edges of the package and attempting to pull or stretch the material away from the product 

for a short time. A pouch with adequate vacuum will return to its original shape when pressure is 

released. If vacuum is adequate the product will not move easily within the pouch.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; Biological Testing Facility (RFP-NIH-NICHD-CPR-09-05).                    

*Date:*                         February 9, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         10 a.m. to 1 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852  (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review,  National Institute of Child Health and Human Development,  6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5b01,  Bethesda, Md 20892-9304, (301) 435-6680,                         *skandasa@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 7, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

 [FR Doc. E9-482 Filed 1-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Federal Aviation Administration

FAA Streamlines UAS COAs for Section 333

Search: ?

News type:

News & Updates

Search

The Federal Aviation Administration has established an interim policy to speed up airspace authorizations for certain

commercial unmanned aircraft (UAS) operators who obtain Section 333 exemptions. The new policy helps bridge the gap

between the past process, which evaluated every UAS operation individually, and future operations after we publish a

final version of the proposed small UAS rule.

Under the new policy, the FAA will grant a Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA) for flights at or below 200 feet to

any UAS operator with a Section 333 exemption for aircraft that weigh less than 55 pounds, operate during daytime

Visual Flight Rules (VFR) conditions, operate within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the pilots, and stay certain distances

away from airports or heliports:

5 nautical miles (NM) from an airport having an operational control tower; or

3 NM from an airport with a published instrument flight procedure, but not an operational tower; or

2 NM from an airport without a published instrument flight procedure or an operational tower; or

2 NM from a heliport with a published instrument flight procedure

The “blanket” 200-foot COA allows flights anywhere in the country except restricted airspace and other areas, such as

major cities, where the FAA prohibits UAS operations. Previously, an operator had to apply for and receive a COA for a

particular block of airspace, a process that can take 60 days. The agency expects the new policy will allow companies

and individuals who want to use UAS within these limitations to start flying much more quickly than before.

Section 333 exemption holders will automatically receive a “blanket” 200 foot COA. For new exemption holders, the FAA

will issue a COA at the time the exemption is approved. Anyone who wants to fly outside the blanket parameters must

obtain a separate COA specific to the airspace required for that operation.

Get more information on the FAA and UAS (http://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/uas/) on our website.
Page last modified: March 24, 2015 12:46:43 PM EDT

This page was originally published at: https://www.faa.gov/news/updates/?newsId=82245
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STATE OF WASHINGTON and STATE

OF MINNESOTA,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

 v.

DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the

United States; et al.,

Defendants-Appellants.

No. 17-35105

D.C. No. 2:17-cv-00141

Western District of Washington, 

Seattle

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

The United States has represented to the Court that the President intends to

issue a new Executive Order and has urged the Court to “hold its consideration of

the case until the President issues the new Order.” The United States has further

represented that it will inform the Court of any new developments. 

En banc proceedings before this Court are stayed pending further Order of

this Court. 

FILED

FEB 16 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
EX - 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report (the "Report") of TCI Solutions,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Lance C. Jacobs, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to
the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: November 14, 2002          By: /s/ Lance C. Jacobs
                                     -------------------------------------
                                       Lance C. Jacobs
                                       Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4542]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-61,780]

Harman/Becker Automotive Systems, Inc., Including On-Site Leased 
Workers From Elwood Staffing, Account Temps and PMI, Currently Known as 
Spartan Staffing Martinsville, IN; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 
Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on July 20, 2007, applicable to workers of 
Harman/Becker Automotive Systems, Inc., Martinsville, Indiana. The 
notice was published in the Federal Register on August 2, 2007 (72 FR 
42436).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged 
in the production of automotive speakers.
    New information shows that workers leased from Elwood Staffing, 
Account Temps and PMI, currently known as Spartan Staffing were 
employed on-site at the Martinsville, Indiana location of Harman/Becker 
Automotive Systems, Inc. The Department has determined that these 
workers were sufficiently under the control of Harman/Becker Automotive 
Systems, Inc. to be considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Elwood Staffing, Account 
Temps and PMI, currently known as Spartan Staffing, working on-site at 
the Martinsville, Indiana location of the subject firm.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers employed at Harman/Becker Automotive Systems, Inc. who were 
adversely affected by a shift in production of automotive speakers to 
Mexico.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-61,780 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Harman/Becker Automotive Systems, Inc., including 
on-site leased workers from Elwood Staffing, Account Temps and PMI, 
currently known as Spartan Staffing, Martinsville, Indiana, who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
June 28, 2006 through July 20, 2009, are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, 
and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment 
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 25th day of February 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-4542 Filed 3-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```
No. 11-7537.

#### David Perez-Montero, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1134, 132 S. Ct. 1058,

181 L. Ed. 2d 776,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 153.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 437 Fed. Appx. 549.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                              8,601
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     289,387
<ALLOWANCES>                      (24,000)
<INVENTORY>                       461,515
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  735,503
<PP&E>                          1,958,742
<DEPRECIATION>                   (380,584)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2,363,112
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,379,042
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             102,560
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                       (313,865)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    2,363,112
<SALES>                         2,220,749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                2,220,749
<CGS>                           1,928,276
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,928,276
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,079,288
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                120,646
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (907,461)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (907,461)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                     (907,461)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0
        


</TABLE>
No. 09-8876.

#### Kali A. Hill, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 997, 130 S. Ct. 1751,

176 L. Ed. 2d 221,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2286.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 332 Fed. Appx. 832.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 pertaining to the 2002 Omnibus Incentive Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Registration No. 333-96547), Form S-3 pertaining to the registration of $1.0 billion of debt securities(Registration No. 333-67943), Form S-8 pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Registration No. 333-40575), Form S-8 pertaining to the Deferred Compensation Plan (Registration No. 333-75492), Form S-8 pertaining to theSupplemental Compensation Plan for Outside Directors (Registration No. 333-109562) and Forms S-8 pertaining to the Stock Incentive Plan (Registration Nos. 333-65252 and 033-63007) of Trane Inc., of our reports dated February 14, 2008, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Trane Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Trane Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

New York, NewYork 

February 14, 2008
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

GILLES L. DELISLE and HELGA

DELISLE,

 Appellants,

v.

GMF, Inc.,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-08-00327-CV

Appeal from the

120th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC#2007-3960)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants move to voluntarily dismiss their interlocutory appeal of a November 5, 2008,

order of the trial court denying their special appearance motions, pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P.

42.1(a)(1). The Appellants no longer wish to pursue this appeal. The Court concludes that the

motion should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal with costs taxed against the Appellants

since there is no agreement otherwise. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(d).

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

March 19, 2009

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
No. 09-8872.

#### Devon Groves, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 997, 130 S. Ct. 1750,

176 L. Ed. 2d 221,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2326.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 559 F.3d 637.
# C_2017368EN.01000101.xml

| 28.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8607 — Warburg Pincus/Tata Motors/Tata Technologies)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 368/01)

On 12 October 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8607. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8607. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
No. 09-860.

#### Mona Pradier, Petitioner v. United States Postal Service.

559 U.S. 973, 130 S. Ct. 1732,

176 L. Ed. 2d 184,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2179.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 334 Fed. Appx. 327.
Date : 2 February 2021 ************************

NSN: 8950-01-693-3659 (PHS) MONOGRAPH NO: M9E4

 ************************ 

 

Item: Powdered Hot Sauce Seasoning Spice Blend (Type II, Class O)

Document: CID A-A-20001B Spices and Spice Blends and PKG & QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 5 Component Classification: Ancillary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Dark reddish-orange granular blend with flakes of red and orange.

Odor: Moderate acidic, fermented red chili pepper, garlic, and spices with a pungent odor.

Flavor: Moderate acidic, fermented red chili pepper, garlic, and spices with a characteristic hot 

flavor.

Texture: Dry and free-flowing.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkened and clumped.

Odor: Oxidized; loss of fermented red chili pepper, garlic, spices and pungent aroma.

Flavor: Oxidized; loss of fermented red chili pepper, garlic, spices and characteristic hot flavor.

Texture: Clumped (not free-flowing).

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

NA
Date : 2 February 2021 ***********************

*

NSN: 8950-01-693-3659 (PHS) MONOGRAPH NO: M9E4

 ************************
No. 09-9150.

#### Gloria D. Smith, Petitioner v. Estes Express.

559 U.S. 1076, 130 S. Ct. 2109,

176 L. Ed. 2d 737,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3291,

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 330 Fed. Appx. 52.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6319

HERBERT CURTIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusDOCTOR FURNEL, Psychiatrist, Ridgeland Correctional Institution, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-99-218-18AK) Submitted: April 29, 1999 Decided: May 5, 1999 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Herbert Curtis, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Herbert Curtis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Curtis v. Furnel , No. CA-99-218-18AK (D.S.C. Mar. 2, 1999). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED