9106 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 39 / Monday, March 2, 2009 / Notices 

alleged violations of section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in 

the importation into the United States, 

the sale for importation, and the sale 

within the United States after 

importation of certain 3G wideband 

code division multiple access handsets 

and components thereof by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 6,674,791; 6,693,579; 

7,117,004; 7,190,966; and 7,286,847. 

The notice of investigation named 

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Seoul, 

Korea; Samsung Electronics America, 

Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey; and 

Samsung Telecommunications America 

LLC of Richardson, Texas (collectively, 

‘‘Samsung’’) as respondents. 

On February 3, 2009, InterDigital and 

Samsung filed a joint motion to 

terminate the investigation in its 

entirety based on a settlement 

agreement. On February 4, 2009, the 

Commission Investigative Attorney filed 

a response in support of the joint 

motion. 

On February 6, 2009, the ALJ granted 

the joint motion to terminate the 

investigation in its entirety. The ALJ 

found that the motion complied with 

the requirements of Commission Rule 

210.21 (19 CFR 210.21). The ALJ also 

concluded that, pursuant to 

Commission Rule 210.50(b)(2) (19 CFR 

210.50(b)(2)), there is no evidence that 

termination of this investigation will 

prejudice the public interest. No 

petitions for review of this ID were filed. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210.42 of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42). 

Issued: February 24, 2009. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9–4297 Filed 2–27–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–640] 

In the Matter of: Certain ShortWavelength Light Emitting Diodes, 

Laser Diodes and Products Containing 

Same; Notice of Commission 

Determination Not To Review an Initial 

Determination Granting Complainant’s 

Motion To Amend the Complaint and 

the Notice of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 53) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

granting complainant’s motion to amend 

the complaint and the notice of 

investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 

205–3152. Copies of the ID and all other 

nonconfidential documents filed in 

connection with this investigation are or 

will be available for inspection during 

official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 

p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone 202–205–2000. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that 

information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. General information 

concerning the Commission may also be 

obtained by accessing its Internet server 

(http://www.usitc.gov). The public 

record for this investigation may be 

viewed on the Commission’s electronic 

docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 

25, 2008, the Commission instituted an 

investigation under section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based 

on a complaint filed by Gertrude 

Neumark Rothschild of Hartsdale, New 

York, alleging a violation of section 337 

in the importation, sale for importation, 

and sale within the United States after 

importation of certain short-wavelength 

light emitting diodes, laser diodes and 

products containing same that infringe 

certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 

5,252,499. 73 FR 1575 (March 25, 2008). 

The complainant named numerous 

entities as respondents. 

On January 12, 2009, complainant 

Rothschild moved to amend the Second 

Amended Complaint and Notice of 

Investigation in order to seek to correct 

the names of respondents Matsushita 

Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. (to 

Panasonic Corporation) and Uni-light 

Touchtek Corporation (to UniLite 

Corporation), and to remove references 

to a number of respondents which have 

been terminated from the investigation. 

On January 30, 2009, the ALJ issued 

Order No. 53 granting complainant’s 

motion. No party petitioned for review 

of the subject ID. The Commission has 

determined not to review the ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210.42(h) of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42(h)). 

Issued: February 24, 2009. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9–4296 Filed 2–27–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

Notice is hereby given that on 

February 11, 2009, a Consent Decree in 

United States v. Northrop Grumman 

Space & Mission Systems Corp., et al., 

Civil Action No. 09–0866, was lodged 

with the United States District Court for 

the Central District of California. 

The Consent Decree resolves claims 

brought by the United States, on behalf 

of the United States Environmental 

Protection Agency (‘‘EPA’’), and the 

California Department of Toxic 

Substances Control (‘‘DTSC’’) under 

Section 107 of the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 

U.S.C. 9607, and Section 7003 of the 

Resource Conservation and Recovery 

Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6973, related 

to the releases and threatened releases 

of hazardous substances at the Puente 

Valley Operable Unit of the San Gabriel 

Valley Area 4 Superfund Site (‘‘Site’’) in 

Los Angeles County, California. 

The Consent Decree resolves the 

liability of Northrop Grumman Space & 

Mission Systems Corp. (‘‘Northrop’’ or 

‘‘Performing Settling Defendant’’) and 

43 cashout parties associated with 17 

source properties and their related 


erowe on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES