alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001067531
<NAME> AMU HOLDINGS
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             562
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   85,111
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,168)
<INVENTORY>                                     35,493
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               139,300
<PP&E>                                         158,172
<DEPRECIATION>                                (24,987)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 333,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,923
<BONDS>                                        270,266
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (64,258)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   333,049
<SALES>                                        207,341
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               207,341
<CGS>                                          181,454
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,473
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (438)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,171
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,319)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (131)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,188)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,188)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (9,188)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (9,188)


</TABLE>
No. 09-8735.

#### Brandon Darnell Reynolds, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 996, 130 S. Ct. 1749,

176 L. Ed. 2d 220,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2242.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 349 Fed. Appx. 915.
No. 09-6531.

#### Damon Lucky, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1031, 130 S. Ct. 1878,

176 L. Ed. 2d 403,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2481.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 569 F.3d 101.
[Cite as State ex rel. Brooks v. Baker Ross , 2023

- Ohio

- 1349.]

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

)ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COUNTY OF SUMMIT )

STATE EX REL. CARL C. BROOKS

Relator

v.

JUDGE SUSAN BAKER ROSS

Respondent C.A. No. 30519

ORIGINAL ACTION IN

PROCEDENDO

Dated: April 26, 2023

PER CURIAM.

{¶1} Relator, Carl C. Brooks , has petitioned this Court for a writ of procedendo to

compel Respondent , Judge Susan Baker Ross

, to rule on his “Motion for New Trial and Jury

Verdict Forms ” pending in Mr. Brooks ’ underlying case

. Judge Baker Ross has moved to dismiss

the complaint as moot because s he has ruled on the motion. Because Mr. Brooks’ did not comply

with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 2969.25, this Court must di smiss this action

.

{¶2} R.C. 2969.25 sets forth specific filing requirements for inmates who file a civil

action against a government employee or entity. Judge Baker Ross is a government employee and

Mr. Brooks, incarcerated in the Allen Correctional Instituti on, is an inmate. R.C. 2969.21(C) and

(D). A case must be dismissed if an inmate fails to comply with the mandatory requirements of

R.C. 2969.25 in the commencement of the action. State ex rel. Graham v. Findlay Mun. Court

,

106 Ohio St.3d 63, 2005

- Ohio

- 36 71, ¶ 6 (“The requirements of R.C. 2969.25 are mandatory, and

failure to comply with them subjects an inmate’s action to dismissal.”)

.C.A. No. 30519

Page 2 of 2

{¶3} Mr. Brooks did not pay the cost deposit required by this Court’s Local Rules. He

also failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25(C), which sets forth specific requirements for an inmate

who seeks to proceed without paying the cost deposit. Mr. Brooks filed a motion to proce ed

without paying the cost deposit , but his affidavit was not notarized. He also failed to file a

statement of his prisoner trust account that sets forth the balance in his inmate account for each of

the preceding six months, as certified by the instituti onal cashier

. R.C. 2969.25(C)

.

{¶4} Because Mr. Brooks did not comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C.

2969.25, the case is dismissed. Costs taxed to Mr. Brooks

.

{¶5} The clerk of courts is hereby directed to serve upon all parties not in default notice

of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. See Civ.R. 58(B).

JENNIFER L. HENSAL

FOR THE COURT

CARR , J.

STEVENSON , J.

CONCUR.

APPEARANCES:

CARL C. BROOKS, Pro Se

, Relator.

SHERRI BEVAN WALSH, Prosecuting Attorney, and MARRETT W. HANNA, Assistant

Prosecuting Attorney, for Respondent.
No. 09-7132.

#### Jane Doe, a Female Juvenile, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 974, 130 S. Ct. 1687,

176 L. Ed. 2d 186,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2149.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 572 F.3d 1162.
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of BMW Vehicle Lease Trust 2017-2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and
 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
     By:
/s/ Ritu ChandyName:
Ritu ChandyTitle:
Vice President – Finance & CFOBMW Financial Services NA, LLC
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4822 

To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to permit development 

of necessary technology to reduce energy demand through more efficient 

torchiere lighting. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2006 

Mr. SESSIONS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to permit 

development of necessary technology to reduce energy 

demand through more efficient torchiere lighting. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Torchiere Lighting Ef5 ficiency Standards and Technology Development Act of 

6 2006’’. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4822 IH 

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

2 Section 325(x) of the Energy Policy and Conserva3 tion Act (42 U.S.C. 6295(x)) is amended by striking 

4 ‘‘January 1, 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘October 1, 2006’’. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
# C_2017428EN.01000702.xml

| 13.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 428/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 428/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8478 — Zukunft Ventures/Gustav Magenwirth/Brake Force One/Unicorn Energy/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 428/05)

On 6 December 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8478. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8478. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
**Exhibit99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifythat the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended January 31, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and thatinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 
| Date:  March 17, 2003 |                                     |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                     |
|                       | /s/ Timothy J. Dodd                      |   |
|                       |                                     |
|                       | Timothy J. Dodd                          |
|                       | *President and  Chief Executive Officer* |

 

 

----
No. 09-808.

#### Fred Beck, et al., Petitioners v. Koppers Inc., fka Koppers Industries Inc., et al.

559 U.S. 1006, 130 S. Ct. 1884,

176 L. Ed. 2d 363,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2745.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS FOR FORM 10-Q**
I, Bruce R. Knooihuizen, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AmericanCellular Corporation (the “registrant”);
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:
     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;
     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
     (c) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an quarterly report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent function):
     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.      AMERICAN CELLULAR CORPORATION
No. 09-9015.

#### Mark Edward Brown, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1020, 130 S. Ct. 1917,

176 L. Ed. 2d 389,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2459.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 592 F.3d 1088.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 38 (Friday, February 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8906-8907]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4244]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

A-570-890


Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China: 
Extension of Time for the Preliminary Results of the New Shipper Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 27, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Stolz, AD/CVD Operations, Office 
8, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4474.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On September 9, 2008, the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') published in the Federal Register a notice of initiation 
of a new shipper review for shipments of wooden bedroom furniture from 
the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') produced and exported by 
Shanghai Fangjia Industry Co., Ltd. (``Shanghai Fangjia''). See Wooden 
Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: Initiation of 
New Shipper Review, 73 FR 52296 (September 9, 2008). The preliminary 
results of review are currently due no later than February 23, 2009.

Statutory Time Limits

    Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(``the Act''), provides that the Department will issue the preliminary 
results of a new shipper review of an antidumping duty order within 180 
days after the day on which the review was initiated. See also 19 CFR 
351.214(i)(1). The Act further provides that the Department may extend 
that 180-day period to 300 days if it determines that the case is 
extraordinarily complicated. See section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and 19 CFR 
351.214 (i)(2).

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results

    The Department determines that this new shipper review involves 
extraordinarily complicated methodological issues, pertaining to the 
calculation of factors of production and the evaluation of the bona 
fide nature of Shanghai Fangjia's sales. Therefore, in accordance with 
section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2), the 
Department is extending the time limit for these preliminary results by 
120 days, until no later than June 22, 2009. The final results continue 
to be due 90 days after the publication of the preliminary results.
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and 777(i) of the Act.


[[Page 8907]]


    Dated: February 20, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-4244 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 42 (Thursday, March 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9609-9610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4713]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-734-000]


Pittsfield Generating Company, LP; Notice of Filing

February 26, 2009.
    Take notice that on February 20, 2009, Pittsfield Generating 
Company, LP filed a request that the Commission waive application of 
the unreserved transmission use penalty provisions in Section 14.5 of 
the Northeast Utilities Companies Local Service Schedule under Section 
II of the ISO New England Inc.'s Transmission, Markets and Services 
Tariff, FERC Electric Tariff No. 3.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail

[[Page 9610]]

<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#65232037262a0b090c0b00361015150a171125030017064b020a13"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="74323126373b1a181d1a11270104041b060034121106175a131b02">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 13, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-4713 Filed 3-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 09-8625.

#### Gary T. Pierce, Petitioner v. Illinois Department of Human Services.

559 U.S. 1013, 130 S. Ct. 1897,

176 L. Ed. 2d 376,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2708.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 355 Fed. Appx. 28.
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Douglas D.G. Birnie, Chief Executive Officer of Ireland Inc.
(the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007, and to which this
      certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                              



| | By:    | /s/
      Douglas D.G. Birnie
| | ------ | -----------------------------
| |        |                              
| | Name:  | DOUGLAS D.G. BIRNIE          
| |        |                              
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer      
| |        |                              
| | Date:  | November 13, 2007            





A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---