alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*****************************

* MONOGRAPH NO: M4A1

*****************************

Provisional 11/16

ITEM: Toaster Pastry, Frosted, Brown Sugar Cinnamon, Without Sprinkles, Enriched 

Wheat Flour, Not Fortified, Rectangular, Single Serving (TypeI, Style B, Flavor 3, Frosting 

Option (B), Frain Composition (1), Fortification b, Shape I, Servings (a)

(TPC)

NSN: ITEM SPECIFICATION: CID-A-A-20211A

PKG&QAP A-A-20211A

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE: 210 Kcals (Primary) 

CHARACTERISTICS OFITEM:

APPEARANCE: Rectangular shape. Crust; uniform, slightly textured, lightly baked. 

Filling; golden tan of uniform thickness.

ODOR AND FLAVOR: Crust; lightly baked. Filling; cinnamon and brown sugar. 

TEXTURE: Crust slightly firm and tender. Filling; thick and sugary.

DEFECTS LIKELY TO OCCUR:

APPEARANCE: Crust; darkened or shiny. Edges broken or crushed. Some migration of 

filling through crust. Filling darkened.

ODOR AND FLAVOR: Crust oxidized, musty or stale. Filling bitter or scorched with loss 

of cinnamon.

TEXTURE: Crust hard, brittle, dry or soggy. Filling dry.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: This product is vacuum packaged. 

Inspect for “inadequate vacuum” by firmly grasping the edges of the package and 

attempting to pull or stretch the material away from the product for a short tome. A 

pouch with adequate vacuum will return to its original shape when pressure is released. If 

vacuum is adequate the product will not move easily within the pouch.

SPECIAL NOTES: Serviceability is significantly affected of more than 1⁄4 of the toaster 

pastry is crushed or if the toaster pastry is broken into more than three parts.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-50173

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MIGUEL ADRIAN GONZALEZ-VILLEGAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

No. 3:09-CR-2963-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Miguel Gonzalez-Villegas pleaded guilty of attempted illegal reentry into

the United States and making a false claim to United States citizenship. The

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 18, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-50173 Document: 00511265616 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/18/2010
No. 10-50173

district court imposed a within-guidelines sentence that included concurrent

terms of 80 months of imprisonment for illegal reentry and 36 months for making a false claim. Gonzalez-Villegas contends that the sentence is substantively

unreasonable, because it is greater than necessary to accomplish the sentencing

goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Gonzalez-Villegas concedes that the plain error standard of review is applicable under circuit precedent, because he did not object to his sentence in the

district court, see United States v. Peltier, 505 F.3d 389, 391-92 (5th Cir. 2007),

but he wishes to preserve for further review the issue “whether a failure to object

to the reasonableness of a sentence upon its imposition requires plain error review.” “[A] sentence within a properly calculated Guideline range is presumptively reasonable.” United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006).

Gonzalez-Villegas argues that his guideline range was too severe, because

the application of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 effectively resulted in the double-counting of

his criminal history; his prior conviction for illegal reentry weighed too heavily

in the calculation of his guideline range; the range overstated the seriousness of

his illegal reentry offense; and the range failed properly to account for his personal history and characteristics and benign motivation in attempting to reenter.

“[T]he sentencing judge is in a superior position to find facts and judge their import under § 3553(a) with respect to a particular defendant.” United States v.

Campos-Maldonado, 531 F.3d 337, 339 (5th Cir. 2008). Gonzalez-Villegas has

not established that his sentence is unreasonable. See United States v. Duarte,

569 F.3d 528, 529-31 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 378 (2009); United States

v. Gomez-Herrera, 523 F.3d 554, 565-66 (5th Cir. 2008).

AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 10-50173 Document: 00511265616 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2010
No. 11-5414.

#### Richard Bell, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 906, 132 S. Ct. 308,

181 L. Ed. 2d 188,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5831.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 420.
No. 11-266.

#### Donald R. Masias, Petitioner v. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services.

565 U.S. 1079, 132 S. Ct. 815,

181 L. Ed. 2d 525,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8826.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 634 F.3d 1283.
M14002

Part II, Section B – Industrial Sites Controlled by Others

1. Operation Description

2. Worker Exposure / Environmental Release Page 1 of 1



## CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED
# C_2018298EN.01031601.xml

| 23.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/316 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/316

---

P8_TA(2017)0120

Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Slovakia, Bulgaria, France, Czech Republic, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Hungary, Cyprus, Estonia, Malta, Romania and Finland *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 5 April 2017 on the draft Council implementing decision on the automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Slovakia, Bulgaria, France, Czech Republic, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Hungary, Cyprus, Estonia, Malta, Romania and Finland and replacing Decisions 2010/682/EU, 2010/758/EU, 2011/355/EU, 2011/434/EU, 2011/888/EU, 2012/46/EU, 2012/446/EU, 2012/672/EU, 2012/710/EU, 2013/153/EU, 2013/229/EU and 2013/792/EU (13526/2016 — C8-0520/2016 — 2016/0820(CNS))

(Consultation)

(2018/C 298/40)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the Council draft (13526/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Council draft (13526/2016),

| — | having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0520/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0520/2016),

| — | having regard to Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (1), and in particular Article 33 thereof, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (1), and in particular Article 33 thereof,

| — | having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0092/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0092/2017),

| 1. | Approves the Council draft; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

---

(1)  OJ L 210, 6.8.2008, p. 1.

---
No. 11-7640.

#### Francisco Barrios, aka Lucio Rincon-Hernandez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1136, 132 S. Ct. 1066,

181 L. Ed. 2d 781,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 510,

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 441 Fed. Appx. 874.
********************************* 

* MONOGRAPH NO.: MCW/LRP 66 

 ********************************* 

ITEM: Peanuts, Shelled, Roasted, Unblanched, 1 oz flex pkg. Type V, Style A 

(PSR) 

NSN: 8925 01 450 4234 ITEM SPECIFICATION: CID A-A-20164. 

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE: 170 (SECONDARY) 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM: 

APPEARANCE: Light to medium tan color with a light even coating of chalky, 

white pulverized salt or "flour salt". 

ODOR AND FLAVOR: Freshly roasted peanuts. Slightly salty. 

TEXTURE: Firm and crunchy 

DEFECTS LIKELY TO OCCUR: 

APPEARANCE: Color darkened 

ODOR AND FLAVOR: Rancid, stale, musty. 

TEXTURE: Soft, not firm and crunchy. 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: Requirements allow this 

product to be packaged either under a full vacuum or with a nitrogen flush. If the 

product is vacuum packaged. procedures for "inadequate vacuum"inspection 

should be followed. 

SPECIAL NOTES: Serviceability is considered significantly affected when more 

than 25.0 percent by weight of peanuts consists of splits or if more than 4.0 percent 

by weight appear broken into pieces '/4 or less of the kernel. 1/ 

1/ A split is defined as the separated half of the kernel
(logo)Rialto

CAPITAL

 

 

**2017 AnnualStatement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)**

 

Poolingand Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of September1, 2017 by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as General Master Servicer,Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as General Special Servicer, National CooperativeBank, N.A. as NCB Master Servicer and NCB Special Servicer, PentalphaSurveillance LLC as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator andWilmington Trust, National Association as Trustee relating to the BANK2017-BNK7, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-BNK7 **(BANK2017-BNK7)**

 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asspecial servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.       Allservicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under thePooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the SpecialServicer.

 

2.       Areview of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer forthe period of September 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”)in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted undermy supervision.

 

3.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and ServicingAgreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there hasbeen a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failureand the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certifiedby: /s/Adam Singer

AdamSinger, Managing Director

 

Date:March 1, 2018
No. 09A736.

#### John McComish, et al., Applicants v. Ken Bennett, Secretary of State of the State of Arizona, et al.

559 U.S. 931, 130 S. Ct. 1498,

176 L. Ed. 2d 105,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1030.

February 16, 2010.

Application to vacate the stay, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Denial is without prejudice to a renewed application on June 1, 2010, or when the Court of Appeals has issued its decision on the merits of the case, whichever date is earlier.
No. 11-727.

#### Louis F. Dietz, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1159, 132 S. Ct. 1119,

181 L. Ed. 2d 981,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 845.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces denied.

Same case below, 70 M.J. 347.
Exhibit 32





Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350








Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pinnacle Airlines Corp. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Philip H. Trenary, the President and Chief Executive Officer, and Peter D. Hunt, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify that this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.








Signature
Title
Date/s/ Philip H. Trenary
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 3, 2010Philip H. Trenary/s/ Peter D. Hunt
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
August 3, 2010Peter D. Hunt
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx








EXHIBIT 10.10

Extension of Note to Mr. Vittoria

Joseph V. Vittoria

1616 South Ocean Boulevard

Palm Beach, FL 33480

(T) 561 659 0860 (F) 561 659 1045




Puradyn Filter Technologies, Inc.

2017 High Ridge Road

Boynton Beach, FL 33426

Attention: Alan J. Sandler, VP, CAO

February 9, 2012

RE:

Standby Commitment Agreement Amendment #13

Dear Mr. Sandler:

Pursuant to the Standby Commitment Agreement letters dated March 28, 2002, and March 14, 2003 and all Amendments thereto, I, Joseph Vittoria (the “Lending Party”), agree to extend the payback dates from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2013.

All other terms defined in the original Standby Commitment Agreement letters and the Amendments thereto, not otherwise in conflict with this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed and delivered by the respective officers hereunto duly authorized on the date first written above.




		
	                                                                                                                   

	/s/ Joseph V. Vittoria


	 
	Joseph V. Vittoria


	 
	 






Accepted and Agreed:

Puradyn Filter Technologies, Inc.




			
	                                                                                                             

	By:

	/s/ Alan J. Sandler


	 
	 
	Alan J. Sandler, Vice President

Chief Administration Officer
No. 11-192.

#### United States, Petitioner v. James X. Bormes.

565 U.S. 1153, 132 S. Ct. 1088,

181 L. Ed. 2d 806,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 584.

January 13, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted.

Same case below, 626 F.3d 574.
----

----

** **
**Exhibit        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO **

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                  report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                          |                                                      |                                     |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
| Date: February                  16, 2007 | By:                                             | /s/ Gerald                  Yakatan |
|                                          | Gerald                  Yakatan                           |
|                                          | Chief                  Executive                  Officer |
No. 11-7272.

#### Carlos Diaz, aka Carlos Alberto Martine, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1099, 132 S. Ct. 861,

181 L. Ed. 2d 560,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8923.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 444 Fed. Appx. 551.
No. 09-7809.

#### Gregg Moore, Petitioner v. Currie Motors of Forest Park, et al.

559 U.S. 943, 130 S. Ct. 1509,

176 L. Ed. 2d 120,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1102.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 387 Ill. App. 3d 1175, 367 Ill. Dec. 210, 981 N.E.2d 535.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 13

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Anthony & Sylvan Pools Corporation and Subsidiary
Mayfield Village, Ohio


We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of
Anthony & Sylvan Pools Corporation and Subsidiary (the "Company") as of March
31, 2000, and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations and
cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2000 and 1999. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data and of making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the
financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to such condensed consolidated financial statements for them to be in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet of the
Company as of December 31, 1999, and the related statements of operations,
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented
herein) and in our report dated February 18, 2000, we expressed an unqualified
opinion on those financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth
in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1999
is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the balance sheet
from which it has been derived.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
April 21, 2000



                                         13
No. 10-10957.

#### Martez Lamont Sher-rod, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1101, 132 S. Ct. 868,

181 L. Ed. 2d 566,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8848.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 859, 132 S. Ct. 194, 181 L. Ed. 2d 101, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6181.
No. 08-1470.

#### Mary Berghuis, Warden, Petitioner v. Van Chester Thompkins.

559 U.S. 932, 130 S. Ct. 1499,

176 L. Ed. 2d 105,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1032.

February 19, 2010.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.
#### Commonwealth *v.*Cooper, Appellant.

Argued October 8, 1953.

Before Stern, C. J., Stearne, Jones, Bell, Chidsey, Musmanno and Ae-NOLD, JJ.

*Lee C. McCandless,*for appellant.

*296
      *Randolph C. Ryder,*Deputy Attorney General, with Mm *Robert B. Greer, Jr.,*for appellee.

November 9, 1953:

Opinion bt

Mr. Justice Jones,

As in tbe case of *Commonwealth v. Strobel,*p. 292 supra, decided this day, the present appellant, Howard J. Cooper, appeals from tbe order of tbe Court of Common Pleas of Butler County dismissing bis appeal to that court from tbe order of tbe Secretary of Revenue suspending bis operator’s license. The court below beard Cooper’s appeal tbe same day as it heard tbe appeal in tbe *Strobel*case and, at tbe conclusion of tbe testimony, summarily dismissed the appeal without maMng any findings of fact whatsoever whereon to base an appropriate conclusion of law. What we have said in *Commonwealth v. Strobel,*supra, with respect to tbe court’s duty to make independent findings of fact on tbe basis of the testimony adduced at the bearing before it is equally applicable here.

Order reversed and case remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
**
**Exhibit 31**

**Certifications**

I, Richard Simpson,certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2017-C4(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicingagreements in all material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, Ihave reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC.; U.S. Bank National Association; Berkeley Point CapitalLLC; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; KeyBank National Association; CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.; National Tax Search, LLC; and Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC. 

Date: November 4, 2019 
/s/ Richard Simpson
Richard Simpson 

President,Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. 

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) 

CGCMT 2017-C4 Certifications (2018) 
**