alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017439EN.01000401.xml

| 20.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 439/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 439/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8679 — Blackstone/Banco Popular Real Estate Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 439/02)

On 13 December 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8679. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8679. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Novellus Systems, Inc. of our report dated January 19, 1997, included in the
1996 Annual Report to Shareholders of Novellus Systems, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Novellus Systems,
Inc. listed in Item 14(a).  This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.
In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-11825, 33-88156, 33-51056, 33-36787, 33-25897, 33-62807)
pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1992 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the
Amended and Restated 1984 Stock Option Plan, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
and the Amended and Restated 1992 Stock Option Plan,  and in the related
prospectuses of our report dated January 19, 1997 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by reference, and of our
report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial
statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Novellus
Systems, Inc.




March 18, 1997
San Jose, California                                 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000835544
<NAME> TRUMP TAJ MAHAL FUNDING INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          88,941
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,257
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,042
<INVENTORY>                                      7,161
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               117,181
<PP&E>                                         908,950
<DEPRECIATION>                                 217,963
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 821,793
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,593
<BONDS>                                        649,139
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   821,793
<SALES>                                        553,748
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               617,746
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  323,628<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               140,230<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,508
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             120,435
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,623)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (26,623)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,623)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Includes gaming, lodging, food and beverage and other
<F2>Includes general & administrative and depreciation and amortization
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                   Exhibit 99



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  Alfredo De Lucrezia, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Baymont Corporation for the quarterly period ended
April 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Baymont  Corporation.


                                  By:       /s/ Alfredo  De  Lucrezia
                                            --------------------------
                                  Name:     Alfredo  De  Lucrezia

                                  Title:    Chief  Executive  Officer
                                            and  Chief  Financial  Officer

                                  Date:     June  16,  2003
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4743 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4743

 To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require 
 prescription drug plans to provide enrollee notice of less expensive 
   part D covered drugs that may be substituted for dispensed drugs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2006

   Mr. Ford introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require 
 prescription drug plans to provide enrollee notice of less expensive 
   part D covered drugs that may be substituted for dispensed drugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENROLLEE NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF LESS EXPENSIVE COVERED 
              PART D DRUG.

    (a) In General.--Section 1860D-4(a) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395w-104(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(5) Information on availability of less expensive covered 
        part d drugs.--If a PDP sponsor provides an explanation of 
        benefits to an enrollee under a prescription drug plan with 
        respect to a covered part D drug dispensed to the enrollee and 
        there is another covered part D drug that could have been 
        substituted for the drug dispensed and that has a lower level 
        of cost-sharing to the enrollee, the sponsor shall provide the 
        enrollee, as part of such explanation of benefits or otherwise, 
        with the information on--
                    ``(A) the name of such drug;
                    ``(B) the lower level of cost-sharing for such 
                drug; and
                    ``(C) the reduction in cost-sharing that would have 
                resulted from the substitution of such drug.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to information relating to drugs dispensed on or 
after the first day of the first month that begins more than 60 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
China Green Energy Industries, Inc.: Exhibit 10.46 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.46

Guaranty Obligations Pre-maturity Covenants between the Parties
Dispute Resolution Validity Acknowledgments by the Guarantors Summary of
Guaranty Contract of RMB 3,200,000, with a term from July 6, 2011 to July
5,2013, between Changzhou Kaikai Lighting Co., Ltd, and Jiangsu Wujin Rural
Commercial Bank, guaranteed by Changzhou City Wujin Best Electronic Cables Co.,
Ltd., Wang Kai and Yao Qin.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05759

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 05759\05759_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05759\05759_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

05759\05759_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05759\05759_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05759\05759_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05759\05759_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05759\05759_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05759\05759_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

05759\Certification Statement Plant ID 05759.pdf Plant certification statement

05759\Supplemental Documents\05759_MG_A5-2 Maps.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05759\Supplemental Documents\MG_A5-3_Water Balance_WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05759\05759_Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
# C_2017401EN.01001701.xml

| 25.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 401/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 401/17

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8683 — Apollo Capital Management/Intertoys Holding)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 401/04)

On 22 November 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8683. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8683. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 3, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 9185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4484]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 09-409; MB Docket No. 08-233; RM-11505]


Television Broadcasting Services; Waco, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Dismissal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of petitioner Comcorp of Texas 
License Corp. (``Comcorp''), the permittee of post-transition DTV 
channel 44, Waco, Texas, dismisses Comcorp's pending petition for 
rulemaking to substitute DTV channel 25 for post-transition DTV channel 
44 at Waco.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adrienne Y. Denysyk, Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Order, MB Docket No. 08-233, adopted February 19, 2009, and released 
February 20, 2009. The full text of this document is available for 
public inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC's 
Reference Information Center at Portals II, CY-A257, 445 12th Street, 
SW., Washington, DC, 20554. This document will also be available via 
ECFS (http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/ ). (Documents will be available 
electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/or Adobe Acrobat.) This document 
may be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best 
Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, 
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-478-3160 or via e-mail http://www.BCPIWEB.com. To request this document in accessible formats 
(computer diskettes, large print, audio recording, and Braille), send 
an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#492f2a2a7c797d092f2a2a672e263f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="55333636606561153336367b323a23">[email protected]</span></a> or call the Commission's Consumer and 
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 
(TTY). This document does not contain information collection 
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 
104-13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any information 
collection burden ``for small business concerns with fewer than 25 
employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 
2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). Provisions of the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to this proceeding.
    This document is not subject to the Congressional Review Act. (The 
Commission, is, therefore, not required to submit a copy of this Order 
to the Government Accountability Office, pursuant to the Congressional 
Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) since this proposed rule is 
dismissed, herein.)

Federal Communications Commission.
Clay C. Pendarvis
Associate Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau.
 [FR Doc. E9-4484 Filed 3-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 09-475.

#### Monsanto Company, et al., Petitioners v. Geertson Seed Farms, et al.

559 U.S. 1060, 130 S. Ct. 2088,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3116.

176 L. Ed. 2d 581,

April 16, 2010.

Motion of the Solicitor General for divided argument granted.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6581

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

CORNELL AUGUSTUS MCKENZIE, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., 

Senior District Judge. (1:91-cr-00429-1; 1:08-cv-01350) 

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009 

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Cornell Augustus McKenzie, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey L. Shih, 

Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Cornell Augustus McKenzie seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that McKenzie has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
No. 09-8251.

#### Jonas E. Gillespie, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 951, 130 S. Ct. 1538,

176 L. Ed. 2d 134,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1306.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 345 Fed. Appx. 757.
Exhibit 10(l)




                     GOLDEN AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
                                  SURPLUS NOTE

Golden  American  Life  Insurance  Company  agrees  to  pay  Equitable  of  Iowa
Companies,  an Iowa corporation,  the sum of $25 million  ($25,000,000.00)  plus
interest at the rate of 8.25% per annum from the date hereof,  December 17, 1996
until paid. In any event, this note will mature on December 17, 2026.

This Surplus Note and accrued  interest thereon shall be subordinate to payments
due to policyholders,  claimant and beneficiary claims, as well as debts owed to
all other classes of debtors of Golden  American Life  Insurance  Company in the
event  of (a) the  institution  of  bankruptcy,  reorganization,  insolvency  or
liquidation proceedings by or against Golden American Life Insurance Company, or
(b)  the  appointment  of  a  Trustee,  receiver  or  other  Conservator  for  a
substantial part of Golden American Life Insurance Company properties.

Any payments made shall first apply to accrued interest, and the balance of such
payment shall apply to reduce the principal of this Note.

Any  payment of  principal  and/or  interest  made shall be subject to the prior
approval of the Delaware  Insurance  Commissioner.  If the  Commissioner has not
approved payment of principal to retire the note prior to its maturity date, the
maturity date will be automatically extended until such time as the Commissioner
authorizes payment of the final balance of principal.

Golden American Life Insurance  Company hereby waives  presentment and notice of
dishonor.

In witness whereof,  Golden American Life Insurance Company has caused this Note
to be executed and delivered.

                           GOLDEN AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

                           BY:  /s/ Terry L. Kendall
                                -------------------------------------------
                                    Terry L. Kendall, President and CEO


Attest by:


/s/ Myles R. Tashman
------------------------------
Myles R. Tashman
Executive Vice President and
General Counsel


                                                                 51
exhibit_10-20.htm


 


 


EXHIBIT 10.20


























 


 









 


 


Solutia Inc.







Executive Tax and Financial Planning


Reimbursement Policy







 Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2010
























































  





  











  



















PURPOSE


 


The purpose of this program is to provide financial planning and tax service reimbursement to designated executives. The Company believes that good financial planning and tax preparation by a professional reduces the time and attention the executive would otherwise spend on his personal financial affairs and affords the executive more time to focus on his/her executive responsibilities.


 







ELIGIBILITY


 


Employees eligible for the program include:


 


 




	  	
1.

	
CEO, CFO, EVP and SVP (Level 1)


	  	
2.

	
Employees designated as participants in the program by the CEO (Level 2)









 



 


PROGRAM SUMMARY


 





A.  Eligible services for reimbursement




 


 




	  	
1.

	
Tax planning and preparation


	  	
2.

	
Estate planning, including wills and trusts


	  	
3.

	
Financial planning


	  	
4.

	
Retirement planning














 


B.  Administration


 


When the executive receives an invoice from a qualified professional of his/her choice, the invoice should be paid by the executive directly to the vendor.  Reimbursement for the paid invoice will be made to the executive through payroll after submission of the invoice to the Human Resources Department.  The Human Resources Department will submit the invoice for processing once approval is received from the most senior executive in Human Resources.







Reimbursement under this policy will be processed through the payroll system and will be subject to any required tax withholding the company may determine applies including, federal state, FICA and Medicare tax.  The reimbursement is not eligible for tax gross-up.  Therefore, the reimbursement will consist of the gross amount submitted for reimbursement, less required tax withholdings.







Invoices for any calendar year should be presented for reimbursement within 90 days following the end of the calendar year in which covered expenses were incurred.


 







C.  The maximum annual reimbursement per calendar year


 



	 	
Level 1- CEO, CFO, EVP and SVP

	 	$	7,000	 
	 	
Level 2- Other eligible executives

	 	$	5,000	 





 


Monies not used in one year can be carried over only to the following year.