alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                                  CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (AS CODIFIED AT 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350).

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 Title 18, United State Code), the undersigned
officer of Cortelco Systems Puerto Rico, Inc., a Puerto Rico corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2003 (the
"Form 10-q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13
(a) or 15(d) of the Security Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: June 13, 2003                          By /s/ Francisco Sanchez
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Vice President
                                              Chief Executive Officer, Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4887 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4887

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
                 amounts awarded to qui tam plaintiffs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2006

 Ms. Berkley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
                 amounts awarded to qui tam plaintiffs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF AMOUNTS AWARDED TO QUI TAM PLAINTIFFS.

    (a) In General.--Part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to items specifically excluded 
from gross income) is amended by inserting after section 139A the 
following new section:

``SEC. 139B. AWARD TO QUI TAM PLAINTIFF.

    ``In the case of an individual, gross income does not include 
amounts awarded to such individual as a result of a qui tam action.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for such part is 
amended by inserting after the item relating to section 139A the 
following new item:

``Sec. 139B. Award to qui tam plaintiff.''.
    (c) Extension of Period to File Amended Return.--Notwithstanding 
any other provision of law, an amended return made during the 3-year 
period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act that includes 
the exclusion from gross income under section 139B of such Code in 
accordance with the amendment made by subsection (a) shall be treated 
as timely made for purposes of such Code.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts awarded to qui tam plaintiffs on or after January 1, 
2002.
                                 <all>
```
No. 09-8049.

#### Robert J. Davis, Petitioner v. Florida.

559 U.S. 949, 130 S. Ct. 1529,

176 L. Ed. 2d 129,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1217.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.

Same case below, 993 So. 2d 1119.
No. 09-9178.

#### Darrell Williams, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1023, 130 S. Ct. 1927,

176 L. Ed. 2d 395,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2456.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2016288EN.01000201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 9.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/2 |

---

EU-28 ethyl alcohol balance sheet for 2015

(Established on 28 July 2016 in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003)

(2016/C 288/02)

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | EU-28 ethyl alcohol balance sheet for 2015 Established on 28 July 2016 in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003[(1)](#ntr1-C_2016288EN.01000201-E0001) | | | Hectolitres of pure alcohol (HLPA) |
| 1. | Initial stock | | | — |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Agricultural origin | | | | 16 926 851 |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Non-agricultural origin | | | | — |
| 2. | Production | | | — |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Agricultural origin | | | | 64 201 116 |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Non-agricultural origin | | | | — |
| 3. | Imports[(2)](#ntr2-C_2016288EN.01000201-E0002) [(3)](#ntr3-C_2016288EN.01000201-E0003) | | | 4 721 410 |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | 0 % Duty | | | | 2 448 098 |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Reduced duty | | | | — |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | 100 % duty | | | | 2 273 312 |
| 4. | Total resources | | | 85 849 377 |
| 5. | Exports | | | 1 626 361 |
| 6. | Internal consumption | | | 65 772 749 |
| | Agricultural | Non-agricultural | Total |
| Food | 9 294 927 | | |
| Industrial | 8 158 146 | | |
| Fuel[(3)](#ntr3-C_2016288EN.01000201-E0003) | 45 216 528 | | |
| Other | 3 103 148 | | |
| | Total | 65 772 749 | | |
| 7. | Final stock | | | — |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Agricultural origin | | | | 18 450 267 |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Non-agricultural origin | | | | — |
| | | | | |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2016288EN.01000201-E0001)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003 of 30 December 2003 introducing certain detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 670/2003 laying down specific measures concerning the market in ethyl alcohol of agricultural origin ([OJ L 346, 31.12.2003, p. 19](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2003_346_R_TOC)).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2016288EN.01000201-E0002)  Covers only products under codes CN 2207 10, CN 2207 20, CN 2208 90 91 and CN 2208 90 99.

[(3)](#ntc3-C_2016288EN.01000201-E0003)  Excludes 3,5 million HLPA under CN 3824 90 92, 3824 90 93 and 3824 90 96 and 0,9 million HLPA of ETBE under CN 2909 19 10 used to produce fuel.

Sources: Communications from the Member States/Eurostat Comext

---
Exhibit 13.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Estre Ambiental, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2018 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 15, 2019

By:

/s/ Sergio PedreiroName:

Sergio PedreiroTitle:

Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, and is not being filed either as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement, and is not to be incorporated by reference into the Report or any other filing of the Company, whether made before or after the
date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. The foregoing certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject
to the liabilities of Section 18 or Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
EXHIBIT 10.1(b)

                            MEDICAL INNOVATIONS, INC.
                        (formerly Bryce Financial, Inc.)
                             1988 STOCK OPTION PLAN
                               AMENDMENT NO. THREE

                  Effective as of the 9th day of February, 1996, the board of
directors approved the following amendment to the 1988 Stock Option Plan (the
"Plan").

                  "Section  8(i)(2) of the Plan is hereby  deleted in its
entirity and the following is substituted in its place:

                  '(2) In the event of a dissolution or liquidation of the
Corporation or a merger or consolidation in which the Corporation is not the
surviving corporation, any outstanding options hereunder may be terminated by
the Corporation as of the effective date of such dissolution, liquidation,
merger or consolidation by giving notice to each holder thereof of its intention
to do so not less than ten (10) days preceding such effective date and
permitting the exercise of all of outstanding options until such effective date,
or the termination of such options if earlier. Notwithstanding the preceding
sentence, if the Corporation is not the surviving corporation as a result of the
Corporation being reorganized or merged or consolidated with another corporation
while unexercised options are outstanding under this Plan, the surviving
corporation may assume the unexercised options outstanding under this Plan or
substitute new options in the surviving corporation for the outstanding options;
provided, however, that the excess of the aggregate fair market value of the
securities subject to the options immediately after the substitution or
assumption over the aggregate option price of such shares is not less than the
excess of the aggregate fair market value of the Common Stock subject to the
outstanding option immediately before such substitution or assumption over the
aggregate option price of such Common Stock.' "
No. 09-6043.

#### Kelvin Levoid Smith, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 988, 130 S. Ct. 1733,

176 L. Ed. 2d 207,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1932.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1116, 130 S. Ct. 1049, 175 L. Ed. 2d 891, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 252.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Office of the Secretary

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health

Washington, D.C. 20201

JUL 2 5 2011

The Honorable Michele M. Leonhart

Administrator

Drug Enforcement Administration

U.S. Department of Justice

8701 Morrissette Drive

Springfield, VA 22152

Dear Ms. Leonhart:

Thank you for your recent letter notifying me of your intention to publish an order in the Federal

Register temporarily placing 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV), 4-methyl-Nmethylcathinone (mephedrone), and 3,4-methylenedioxy-N-methylcathinone (methylone) into

Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).

I asked the FDA to review its files and they advise that there are currently no investigational new

drug applications (INDs) or approved new drug applications (NDAs) for these substances. The

Department of Health and Human Services has no objection regarding your plans to temporarily

place the above mentioned three synthetic cathinones into Schedule I of the CSA.

Sincerely yours,

Howard K. Koh, M.D., M.P.H.

Assistant Secretary for Health

U.S. Public Health Service
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0079

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

BETHANY LYNN LEX,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 8, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 2 2023

08/02/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0079
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-64,389] 

                    By application received on February 4, 2009, the petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on December 22, 2008. The Notice of Determination was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 14, 2009 (74 FR 2139).                 

The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the finding that imports of color concentrates did not contribute importantly to worker separations at the subject firm and no shift in production to a foreign source occurred. 

In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner provided additional information regarding a shift in production of color concentrates to Mexico. 

The Department has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974. 

## Conclusion 

After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of February 2009. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E9-4547 Filed 3-3-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
No. 11-5974.

#### Jerry Law, Petitioner v. J. Tim Ochoa, Warden.

565 U.S. 981, 132 S. Ct. 504,

181 L. Ed. 2d 355,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7786.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 09-9078.

#### Bill Marquardt, Petitioner v. Wisconsin.

559 U.S. 1041, 130 S. Ct. 2073,

176 L. Ed. 2d 422,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2824.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District III, denied.

Same case below, 322 Wis. 2d 574, 776 N.W.2d 288.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at July 31, 2000 (Unaudited) and
the Consolidated Statement of Income for the six months ended July 31, 2000
(Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,638
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,823
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    103,238
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               130,876
<PP&E>                                         125,145
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,438
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 338,037
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          597,212
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   338,037
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,188
<CGS>                                           14,618
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,618
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                64,928
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (69,728)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (69,728)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350 (ADOPTED PURSUANTTO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)**

In connection with the periodic report of Quantum Fuel SystemsTechnologies Worldwide, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Alan P. Niedzwiecki, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge: 

(1)          the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

(2)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the datesand for the periods indicated. 

| Date: March 17, 2003 |   | /s/ ALAN P. NIEDZWIECKI                          |
|---------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   |                                                  |
|                      |   | **Alan P. Niedzwiecki, Chief Executive Officer** |
CLD

- 293 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 1 6

- 1860

___________ IN RE: JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR., Petitioner

____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Related to D.N.J. Civ. No s
. 1:15

- cv
- 07887 & 1:16

- cv
- 00251 )

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

June 16, 2016 Before: FISHER, JORDAN, and VANASKIE , Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed : June 29, 2016 )

_________ OPINION *

_________ PER CURIAM James L. Roudabush, Jr., sought to file two lawsuits in forma pauperis in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The District Court denied
him leave to do so on the grounds that he has “three strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and did not show that he was in imminent danger of serious physical injury. Roudabush

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.2

h as appealed from the orders

. He also submits a petition for a writ of mandamus to challenge the District Court’s orders in those cases.
We must deny his petition because m andamus is not a substitute for appeal. See Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court , 542 U.S. 367 , 380

- 81 (2004); Madden v. Myers , 102 F.3d 74, 79 (3d Cir. 1996)

. Mandamus is an extra ordinary remedy. See Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). A petitioner must ordinarily have no other means to obtain the desired relief, and he must show a clear and indisputable right to issuance of the writ. In

re School Asbestos Litig. , 977 F.2d 764, 772 (3d Cir. 1992). Roudabush cannot claim that he has no other means to get relief where his appeals provide an adequate alternative
to mandamus. See In re Briscoe , 448 F. 3d 201, 212

- 13 (3d Cir. 2006).
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
**PURSUANT TO**
**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alion Science and TechnologyCorporation (the “Corporation”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, John M. Hughes, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCorporation.   Date: May 17, 2004      By: /s/ John M. Hughes   Name: John M. Hughes Title: Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-7741.

#### Jiri Pik, Petitioner v. The Institute of International Education, Inc., et al.

559 U.S. 1009, 130 S. Ct. 1937,

176 L. Ed. 2d 370,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2613.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 38 (Friday, February 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4188]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee <greek-i>13883; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee 
(<greek-i>13883).
    Date and Time: March 5, 2009, 2 p.m.-4 p.m. EDT.
    Place: Teleconference.
    National Science Foundation, Room 1060, Stafford I Building, 
4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA, 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Craig B. Foltz, Acting Division Director, 
Division of Astronomical Sciences, Suite 1045, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 703-
292-4908.
    Reason for Late Notice: Due to scheduling complications. At the 
last meeting, February 19, it was decided that another meeting via 
teleconference was required to review the draft annual report before 
the March 15 submission.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations to the 
National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and 
Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 
on issues within the field of astronomy and astrophysics that are of 
mutual interest and concern to the agencies.
    Agenda: To discuss the Committee's draft annual report due 15 
March 2009.

    Dated: February 24, 2009.
Susanne E. Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
 [FR Doc. E9-4188 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P