alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32





Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350








Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pinnacle Airlines Corp. for the quarterly period ended May 4, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Philip H. Trenary, the President and Chief Executive Officer, and Peter D. Hunt, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify that this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.








Signature
Title
Date/s/ Philip H. Trenary
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 4, 2010Philip H. Trenary/s/ Peter D. Hunt
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
May 4, 2010Peter D. Hunt
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

 

 ************************* 

 MONOGRAPH NO. BO23 

 ************************* 

ITEM: Syrup, Table, Regular, Imitation Maple, Type IV, Style 1, Flavor A 

SPECIFICATION: CID A-A 20124C NSN: 8920 01 366 1611 

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 84 

COMPONENT CLASSIFICATION: Secondary 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM: 

APPEARANCE: Thick, viscous liquid; medium to dark brown color. 

ODOR: Sweet, Maple. 

FLAVOR: Maple, imitation fenugreek (herb). 

TEXTURE: Smooth, thick, syrup. 

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 70 DEGREES F: 36 months 

80 DEGREES F: 27 months 

90 DEGREES F: 18 months 

100 DEGREES F: 9 months 

 

EXPECTED DETERIORATIVE CHANGES: 

APPEARANCE: Darker color, crystallized. 

ODOR: Sweet, maple. 

FLAVOR: Maple, bitterness possible. 

TEXTURE: Possibly thinner. 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None. 

SPECIAL NOTES: Product is packaged in a 12 ounce plastic bottle.
Exhibit 3.3.8








CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT


OF


CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF


PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION





Patriot Scientific Corporation, a corporation duly organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”), does hereby certify that:





I.                The amendment to the Corporation’s Certificate of Incorporation set forth below was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.





II.               The first paragraph of the FIFTH Article of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation be amended to read as follows:




FIFTH.  The aggregate number of shares of capital stock of all classes which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is SIX HUNDRED FIVE MILLION (605,000,000), having a par value of $.00001 per share, of which SIX HUNDRED MILLION (600,000,000) shall be designated Common Stock (the “Common Stock”
or “Common Shares”), and FIVE MILLION (5,000,000) shall be designated Preferred Stock, par value $.00001 per share (the “Preferred Stock”). The Preferred Stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series. All shares shall be issued for such consideration or considerations as the Board of Directors of the Corporation may from time to time determine.  All rights, preferences, voting powers, relative, participating, optional or other special rights and privileges, and
qualifications, limitations or restrictions of the Preferred Stock shall be fixed by the Board of Directors of the Corporation. The rights, preferences, voting powers, relative, participating, optional or other special rights and privileges, and qualifications, limitations or restrictions of the Common Stock shall be expressly made subject and subordinate to those that may be fixed with respect to any shares of the Preferred Stock and shall be as follows:





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Patriot Scientific Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be executed by Frederick C. Goerner, its authorized officer, on this 12th day of March, 2009.








/s/ FREDERICK C. GOERNERFrederick C. Goerner, President andChief Executive Officer
# C_2017287EN.01000101.xml

| 31.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8524 — Advent International Corporation/Industrial Parts Holding)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 287/01)

On 25 August 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8524. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8524. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Form of Award Notice under the Restricted Stock Unit Plan dated March 12, 2010



 Exhibit 10.32 

 

 

 March 12, 2010 
 Chrysler Group LLC Restricted Stock Unit Plan 
 Award Notice 

[Name] 
 Dear
                            : 

Chrysler Group LLC (the “Company”) is pleased to evidence and confirm its grant to you of
             Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) on March 12, 2010, pursuant to the Chrysler Group LLC Restricted Stock Unit Plan (the “RSU Plan”). The
terms defined in the RSU Plan have the same meanings in this Award Notice. This Award Notice and the RSUs evidenced by this Award Notice are subject to and subordinate to the terms and conditions set forth in the RSU Plan which is enclosed.

 This Award Notice is intended to comply and will be administered in a manner that complies with the limitations and
restrictions imposed by Section 111 of TARP. The Special Master has approved the grant of the RSUs to you. However, compensation that is not permitted to be paid or accrued under TARP shall not be paid or accrued under this Award Notice, and
you shall have no right or claim against the Company for any benefits or compensation that the Company, in its discretion, determines is not payable or cannot be accrued under this Award Notice as a result of compliance with TARP. 

             of the RSUs evidenced by this Award Notice are
Service RSUs and will vest if you are continuously employed through March 12, 2013, and the EBITDA target threshold for 2010 of $2.5 billion is achieved.              of
the RSUs evidenced by this Award Notice are IPO RSUs and will vest if you are continuously employed through the later of (x) March 12, 2013 and (y) the date on which a Chrysler IPO occurs. Except as provided in
Section 5(b) (death or Disability) or Section 5(c) (Retirement) of the RSU Plan, if your employment terminates prior to the Vesting Date set forth above, the Unvested RSUs then held by you shall be forfeited without payment as of the date
your employment terminates. 







 Except as provided in Section 6(b) (overriding TARP rule) of the RSU Plan, an amount
equal to the Fair Market Value of the Chrysler Units underlying the Vested RSUs credited to your RSU Account will be paid on or as soon as practicable after the applicable Vesting Date, but in no event later than March 15 of the calendar year
next following the calendar year in which the Vesting Date occurs. 
  

			
	CHRYSLER GROUP LLC
		
	By:	 	
	  

	Nancy A. Rae	 	Date            
	Senior Vice President	 	
	Human Resources	 	


  

			
	PARTICIPANT
	
	  

	[Name]	 	Date            



  
 2
No. 09-8955.

#### Dickie Crawley, Petitioner v. Ohio.

559 U.S. 1052, 130 S. Ct. 2348,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3048.

176 L. Ed. 2d 567,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Hamilton County, denied.
No. 09-8531.

#### Alphonso Marvin Tindal, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 959, 130 S. Ct. 1559,

176 L. Ed. 2d 146,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1429.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 436.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-0100

_____________________________

BILAL HASSON LEVERETT,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel—

Original Jurisdiction.

July 5, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate 

counsel is denied on the merits.

WOLF, LEWIS, and RAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Bilal Hasson Leverett, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Steven E. Woods, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement


 Exhibit 10.1 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is entered into by and between Gastar Exploration, Ltd., a Canadian corporation,
Gastar Exploration USA, Inc. (f/k/a First Sourcenergy Wyoming, Inc.), a Delaware corporation (together, the “Company”), and Michael A. Gerlich (“Gerlich”) as of April 10, 2012. 

WHEREAS, the Company and Gerlich have heretofore entered into that certain Employment Agreement effective as of April 26,
2005, and subsequently amended on July 25, 2008 (the “Employment Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company
and Gerlich desire to further amend the Employment Agreement; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises set
forth above and the mutual agreements set forth herein, the Company and Gerlich hereby agree, effective as of the date set forth above, that the Employment Agreement shall be amended as hereafter provided: 

1. Section 8(b) is amended to read as follows: 
 Amount of Severance Payment. Gerlich shall receive a lump sum severance payment equal to the product of (i) 2.5 and (ii) the sum of (A) his highest rate of annual base salary in
effect at any time during the one year period preceding Gerlich’s termination of employment and (B) a target bonus amount equal to 60% of such highest rate of annual base salary, and if Gerlich timely elects COBRA health plan continuation
coverage under the Company’s group health plan, the Company shall pay Gerlich, on the first of each month during his COBRA continuation period, an amount equal to his required COBRA premium. If Gerlich dies during the COBRA continuation period,
this health plan continuation coverage and the Company’s monthly payment of the COBRA premium amount will continue for the benefit of Gerlich’s eligible beneficiary(ies) for the remainder of the COBRA continuation period applicable to
them. 
 Except as expressly modified by this Second Amendment, the terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect and are hereby confirmed and ratified. The Gastar Exploration, Ltd. Employee Change of Control Severance Plan (“Severance Plan”) provides severance benefits thereunder are to be offset by the severance benefits provided under
this Employment Agreement to avoid any duplication of benefits. Nothing in the Severance Plan shall be construed or operate to eliminate the COBRA continuation coverage and Company monthly COBRA premium payments provided to surviving beneficiaries
of Gerlich under this Employment Agreement. 






 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment as of
April 10, 2012 but effective for all purposes as of January 1, 2012. 
  

									
	GASTAR EXPLORATION USA, INC.	 		 	GASTAR EXPLORATION, LTD.
					
	By:	 	 /s/ J. Russell Porter  
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ J. Russell Porter     

	Name: J. Russell Porter	 		 	Name: J. Russell Porter
	Title: President	 		 	Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
			
		 		 	GERLICH
				
		 		 		 	 /s/ Michael A. Gerlich   

		 		 	Michael A. Gerlich


  
 -2-
No. 09-7760.

#### Laurie Marie Laskey, Petitioner v. Sun Microsystems, Inc.

559 U.S. 1033, 130 S. Ct. 1946,

176 L. Ed. 2d 410,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2376.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 910, 130 S. Ct. 1294, 175 L. Ed. 2d 1084, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 947.
Exhibit 35.9



LOGO

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2017, by and among MORGAN STANLEY CAPITAL I INC.,
as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as General Special Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer and as NCB Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates Series 2017-BNK5 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the period from March 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period
has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018.



LOGO



Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank



LOGO
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
**PURSUANT TO**
**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alion Science and TechnologyCorporation (the “Corporation”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Bahman Atefi, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Corporation.   Date: August 13, 2004   By: /s/ Bahman Atefi Name: Bahman Atefi Title: Chief Executive Officer
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4916 

To authorize United States participation in, and appropriations for, the 

United States contribution to the first replenishment of the resources 

of the Enterprise for the Americas Multilateral Investment Fund. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2006 

Ms. PRYCE of Ohio (for herself, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mrs. 

MALONEY, and Mrs. BIGGERT) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To authorize United States participation in, and appropriations for, the United States contribution to the first 

replenishment of the resources of the Enterprise for the 

Americas Multilateral Investment Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FIRST REPLENISHMENT OF THE RESOURCES 

4 OF THE ENTERPRISE FOR THE AMERICAS 

5 MULTILATERAL INVESTMENT FUND. 

6 The Inter-American Development Bank Act (22 

7 U.S.C. 283 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the 

8 following: 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4916 IH 

1 ‘‘SEC. 39. FIRST REPLENISHMENT OF THE RESOURCES OF 

2 THE ENTERPRISE FOR THE AMERICAS MUL3 TILATERAL INVESTMENT FUND. 

4 ‘‘(a) CONTRIBUTION AUTHORITY.— 

5 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the 

6 Treasury may contribute on behalf of the United 

7 States $150,000,000 to the first replenishment of 

8 the resources of the Enterprise for the Americas 

9 Multilateral Investment Fund. 

10 ‘‘(2) SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATIONS.—The au11 thority provided by paragraph (1) may be exercised 

12 only to the extent and in the amounts provided for 

13 in advance in appropriations Acts. 

14 ‘‘(b) LIMITATIONS ON AUTHORIZATION OF APPRO15 PRIATIONS.—For the United States contribution author16 ized by subsection (a), there are authorized to be appro17 priated not more than $150,000,000, without fiscal year 

18 limitation, for payment by the Secretary of the Treas19 ury.’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136661 Michael F. Cavanagh 

& (12) Elizabeth A. Weaver

Marilyn Kelly (17) Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136661 

 COA: 284457 

Saginaw CC: 06-027898-FC 

JESSE RUCARDO WADE,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 30, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to remand is 

DENIED. The motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. 

l1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
No. 09-876.

#### Isidoro Rodriguez, Petitioner v. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

559 U.S. 1045, 130 S. Ct. 2084,

176 L. Ed. 2d 429,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2870.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6634

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff – Appellee, 

v. 

CARLOS WOODS, 

Defendant – Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District 

Judge. (1:07-cr-00127-WDQ-1; 1:10-cv-01321-WDQ) 

Submitted: July 21, 2011 Decided: July 26, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Carlos Woods, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr., 

Assistant United States Attorney, Jason M. Weinstein, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Carlos Woods seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Woods has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
3

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.CERTIFICATIONIn connection with the annual report of Novellus Systems, Inc. (the “Company) on Form 10-K for theperiod ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report),I, William H. Kurtz, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of theUnited States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periodsindicated.This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.               Date: February 27, 2008 By:  /s/ William H. Kurtz    William H. Kurtz    Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
No. 09-8911.

#### Cary A. Wilke, Petitioner v. Barbara Meyer, et al.

559 U.S. 1051, 130 S. Ct. 2346,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3058.

176 L. Ed. 2d 566,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 345 Fed. Appx. 944.
No. 09-8526.

#### Albert A. Young, Petitioner v. David DiGuglielmo, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford.

559 U.S. 1011, 130 S. Ct. 1889,

176 L. Ed. 2d 372,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2581.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.