alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6671** 

JAMIE GOSS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. JOSEPH MCFADDEN, Warde n , Lieber Correctional Institution , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Mary G. Lewis , District Judge. ( 4:14

- cv - 01299

- MGL )

Submitted : October 29, 2015 Decided: November 4, 2015

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Jamie Goss, Appellant Pro Se. Alphonso Simon, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are no t binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jamie Goss seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 4 ( 2012 ) petition . The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B ) ( 2012 ). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Goss that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The timely filing of spec ific objections to a magistrate judge ’ s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

- 46 (4th C ir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Goss has waived appellate review by fai ling to timely file objections

. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Provisional 11/16 

NSN:

* MONOGRAPH NO:M10TP

Item: Almonds (unblanched), Flavored (Smoked), (Type IX, Style C) (ASF)

Document: CID A-A-20164 Nuts, Shelled, Roasted and PKG & QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 137 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Whole almond. Cinnamon brown skin intact with evenly distributed coating of fine 

salt.

Odor: Fresh roasted, smoked almond.

Flavor: Fresh roasted, smoked almond.

Texture: Firm crisp bite. Not excessively hard or dry.

Possible Deteriorative Changes

Appearance: Some slight darkening.

Odor: Rancid, some loss of smoke.

Flavor: Rancid, some loss of smoke.

Texture: Soft, not crisp.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

This product is vacuum packaged. Inspect for “inadequate vacuum” by firmly grasping the edges of the 

package and attempting to pull or stretch the material away from the product for a short time. A pouch 

with adequate vacuum will return to its original shape when pressure is released. If vacuum is adequate 

the product will not move easily within the pouch.

Special Notes: NA
No. 09-8401.

#### Adonnis Atchison, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 956, 130 S. Ct. 1549,

176 L. Ed. 2d 140,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1486.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9257]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4518]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1818-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]


Kentucky; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-1818-DR), dated February 5, 
2009, and related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: February 13, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective February 13, 2009.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Nancy Ward,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
 [FR Doc. E9-4518 Filed 3-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Exhibit 31.2

CFO CERTIFICATION

I, James G.
Krause, certify that:



| | (1) | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of TCW Direct Lending VII LLC; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                              
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2018 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ James G. Krause          
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | James G. Krause              
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
No. 11-6442.

#### Shaeffer Coleman, Petitioner v. Alabama, et al.

565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 589,

181 L. Ed. 2d 432,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8207.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4646 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4646

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
7320 Reseda Boulevard in Reseda, California, as the ``Coach John Wooden 
                         Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 7320 
Reseda Boulevard in Reseda, California, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Coach John Wooden Post Office Building''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Coach John Wooden Post 
Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
No. 11-199.

#### Alexander Vasquez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1176, 132 S. Ct. 1161,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1015,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 928.

January 23, 2012.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis granted.

Same case below, 635 F.3d 889.
ex10_20.htm








Exhibit 10.20







 


PROJECT ASSIGNMENT







This Project Assignment is issued under the Independent Contractor Services Agreement (“Original Agreement”) dated August 14, 2007, between Scientific Learning Corporation of Oakland, California (“SLc”) and School Executive Consulting, Inc. of Dallas, Texas (“Contractor”).







Services to be performed:


Under the direction of the CEO or the person to whom he delegates this role, provide executive-level marketing and sales consulting services on a nationwide basis, including but not limited to (1) activities nationwide directed toward increasing the awareness about the Fast ForWord products and the research behind the products and (2) assisting in the organization of a team of prominent educational authorities in Texas to support SLC’s marketing and sales activities in Texas under the direction of the Regional Sales Director.







Time Period during which Services will be performed:


The term of this Project Assignment will begin January 1, 2012 and end December 31, 2012.







Fees for Services:


SLC will pay Contractor a consulting fee of $3,333 per month.







Expenses:


SLC will also reimburse Contractor for reasonable travel, lodging, phone, mileage and meal expenses incurred in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement provided that Contractor has obtained prior approval from Contractor’s principal SLC contact and submits verification of such expenses as SLC may require.







Payment Requirements:


SLC will pay Contractor the monthly consulting fee by the 15th of the applicable month, without the need for invoice.  For expenses, Contractor shall invoice SLC.  SLC will pay invoices within thirty (30) days of receipt.







Note:   This Project Assignment is governed by the terms of an Independent Contractor Services Agreement in effect between SLc and Contractor.  Any item in this Project Assignment which is inconsistent with that Agreement is invalid.








	
Signed:

	
/s/ Andy Myers

	  	
/s/ Mike Moses


	  	
For Client Hiring Manager

	  	
For Contractor


	  	  	  	  
	
Dated:

	
2/24/2012

	  	
2-2-12
No. 11-7872.

#### James R. Griffin, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1183, 132 S. Ct. 1154,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1026,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 951.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
#### Victory Land Company, a Corporation, *Appellant,*v. James W. Keggin, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed March 8, 1926.

*Lane & Bussey*and *Raney H. Martin,*for Appellant;

*Mabry, Reaves & Carlton,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
NO. 07-02-0176-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

MAY 14, 2002

______________________________

MICHAEL A. OTT

Appellant

v.

ARLENE J. OTT

Appellee

 

FROM THE 247TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY;

NO. 00-24499; HON. BONNIE G. HELLUMS, PRESIDING

______________________________

ORDER ON APPELLANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

 

Before BOYD, C.J., QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

Michael A. Ott, appellant, has moved to dismiss his appeal contending that he “no

longer wishes to continue with his appeal.“ Without passing on the merits of the case, we

grant the motion pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2) and dismiss the

appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s personal request, no motion for rehearing

will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

 

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
Order filed, September 02, 2016

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00528

- CR

____________ JOSE MARIA PELAYO , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Crim Ct at Law No 12

Harris County, Te xas Trial Court Cause No. 1932164



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due August 22, 2016

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the
record. The record has not been filed with the court. Be cause the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Laurie Buchanan , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
No. 09-9297.

#### William Tisdol, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1045, 130 S. Ct. 2080,

176 L. Ed. 2d 430,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2868.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 09-8788.

#### Everett Leon Black, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1039, 130 S. Ct. 2067,

176 L. Ed. 2d 419,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2802.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
China Green Energy Industries, Inc.: Exhibit 10.49 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.49

Guaranty Obligations Pre-maturity Covenants between the Parties
Dispute Resolution Validity Acknowledgments by the Guarantors Summary of
Guaranty Contract of RMB 16,500,000, with a term from May 17, 2011 to May 16,
2013, between Changzhou Chuanghua Plastics Co., Ltd, and Wujin Branch,
Agricultural Bank of China, guaranteed by Changzhou City Wujin Best Electronic
Cables Co., Ltd.
No. 09-8701.

#### In re Lindsey Kent Springer, Petitioner.

559 U.S. 990, 130 S. Ct. 1755,

176 L. Ed. 2d 211,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2285.

March 8, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until March 29, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
First Amendment to the Prudential Insurance Supplemental Executive Retirement



 Exhibit 10.35 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO  
 THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE

 SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN  

(As Amended and Restated January 1, 2009) 
 WHEREAS, The Prudential Insurance Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) was amended and restated, effective as of January 1, 2009, to comply with the requirements of
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”); 
 WHEREAS, in connection with such
restatement, the most senior Vice President responsible for Corporate Human Resources (“Authorized Officer”) was authorized to make such additional amendments to the Plan as she deemed necessary or appropriate to address the requirements
of Section 409A; 
 WHEREAS, the Authorized Officer delegated the Authority to Haroon Saeed, Vice President, Compensation;
and 
 WHEREAS, it has been determined that, to facilitate the administration of the Plan and to assure compliance with such
Section 409A of the Code, both as to the Plan benefits and other benefits that may be payable to the same person conditioned upon the execution of such a release, the time at which a release needs to be delivered to qualify to receive the
benefits payable under the Plan should be modified to allow coordination among the various applicable benefit plans. 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, effective as of January 1, 2010, Section 4.4 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
 Release. Except in the case of any Accrued Benefits that will commence to be paid on account of the death of the Participant, any Accrued Benefits accrued under this Plan shall be null and void and
not be payable if the Participant shall fail to execute a Release (or, having timely executed such Release, shall revoke any such Release during the period permitted at law for revocation of such Release) within such period that the Company or the
Committee shall specify from time to time, which period shall in all events begin following his Termination of Employment and end prior to the date payment of benefits are scheduled to commence hereunder. Subject to applicable law, any breach by a
Participant of a Release shall give the Company the right to forfeit any and all future payments to the Participant under the Plan and to recover any benefits previously paid, as well as the right to reimbursement by the Participant of any attorney
fees and costs expended by the Company in enforcing such right of return.
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The
Prudential Insurance Company of America, by action of the undersigned duly authorized officer, has caused this amendment to the Prudential Insurance Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan to be executed this 14th day of December 2010. 

 

	
	THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA.
	
	 /s/ Haroon Saeed

	 Haroon Saeed

Vice President, Compensation
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IPC Acquisition Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Timothy Whelan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | By: /s/ Timothy Whelan 
| |  |                        
| |  | Timothy Whelan         
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
| |  | February 13, 2004
No. 09-8439.

#### John Richard Proctor, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 956, 130 S. Ct. 1552,

176 L. Ed. 2d 142,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1395.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 329 Fed. Appx. 502.
**Exhibit 99.2**

**Certification of PrincipalExecutive Officer and****Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. 1350**

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Anthony & Sylvan Pools Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), William J. Evanson, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|                                                                 |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ WILLIAM J. EVANSON                                               |   |   |        |
|                                                                      |   |   |   |
| **William J. Evanson****Chief Financial Officer**Dated: May 15, 2003 |   |   |   |

 

18
EXHIBIT 12.1

CRT PROPERTIES, INC. Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (In Thousands
except Ratios)

|                                                |  |  |  | (For the Years Ended December 31,) |       
|----------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------- | ------
|
|EARNINGS:                                       |  |  |  |                                    |       
|Net
Income                                      |  |  |  | $                                  | 15,902
|                                                |  |  |  |                                    |       
|Adjustments:                                    |  |  |  |                                    |       
|Income tax
(benefit) provision                  |  |  |  |                                    |      
|Minority
Interest                               |  |  |  |                                    | 124   
|Equity in
earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary |  |  |  |                                    |      
|Interest
Expense                                |  |  |  |                                    | 30,573
|Amortization
of loan costs                      |  |  |  |                                    | 1,669 
|Distributed
income of equity investees          |  |  |  |                                    |      
|Interest
capitalized                            |  |  |  |                                    |      
|Gain on sale
of assets                          |  |  |  |                                    | (211  
|Earnings                                        |  |  |  | $                                  | 48,057
|                                                |  |  |  |                                    |       
|FIXED
CHARGES:                                  |  |  |  |                                    |       
|Dividends on
preferred stock                    |  |  |  | $                                  | 6,352 
|Interest
Expense                                |  |  |  |                                    | 30,573
|Interest
Capitalized                            |  |  |  |                                    |      
|Amortization
of loan costs                      |  |  |  |                                    | 1,669 
|Total Fixed
Charges                             |  |  |  | $                                  | 38,594
|                                                |  |  |  |                                    |       
|RATIO OF
EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES              |  |  |  |                                    | 1.25  

76

---
No. 11-6480.

#### Rolon Lamarr Morris, II, Petitioner v. Tom Carey, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 589,

181 L. Ed. 2d 433,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8093.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 634.
No. 09-705.

#### Francisco Molina, Jr., Petitioner v. Superior Court of California, Contra Costa County, et al.

559 U.S. 971, 130 S. Ct. 1690,

176 L. Ed. 2d 180,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2123.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, denied.
No. 09-696.

#### John J. Kane Regional Centers - Glen Hazel, Petitioner v. Sarah Grammer, as Administratrix of the Estate of Melvinteen Daniels, Deceased.

559 U.S. 939, 130 S. Ct. 1524,

176 L. Ed. 2d 113,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1292.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

*114Same case below, 570 F.3d 520.