alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 04, 2023. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, December 04, 2023 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24I0073. CHATHAM AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY v. KELVIN ALBRIGHT. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: STCV210599
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Civil Action No. 19-1718 (CKK)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On May 31, 2019, plaintiff filed the original complaint in the Superior Court of the 

District of Columbia, and on June 12, 2019, defendant removed the case. ECF No. 1. On June 

24, 2019, plaintiff moved to dismiss the case voluntarily. ECF No. 5. The Court will grant the

motion and dismiss this case without prejudice. Plaintiff’s pending motion for a temporary 

restraining order, ECF No. 4, will be denied without prejudice as moot. An Order is issued 

separately.

DATE: July 10, 2019 /s/

COLLEEN KOLLAR KOTELLY

United States District Court Judge 

MAURICE B. MOORE, :

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL :

MANAGEMENT, :

:

Defendant. :
# C_2017273EN.01000101.xml

| 18.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8530 — Brookfield/Engie/FHHGL)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 273/01)

On 14 August 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8530. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8530. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          14,814
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  566,833
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,084
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               594,581
<PP&E>                                          80,635
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,815
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 893,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          362,319
<BONDS>                                          6,727
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,168,391
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   524,845
<SALES>                                         99,404
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                99,404
<CGS>                                           17,597
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  391,138
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (332,981)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (332,981)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (332,981)        
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (332,981)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. E R WI N A L VA R AD O, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 11- 10622 D. C. No . 4 : 1 1 - c r - 0 2 0 0 2 - J GZB P V -1 ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona C i ndyK . J or ge ns on, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r10, 2012 ** B efo re: W A R D L A W , C L IF T O N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. E rw in A lv a r a d o ap p e a ls f r o m th e 2 4

– m o n th s e n te n c e im p o s e df o llo w in g h is g u i l ty - p l e ac o n v i c t i o n f o ri l l e g a l r e - e n trya f

t e rd e p o rt a t i o n , i n v i o l a t i o n o f 8 U . S. C. § 1 3 2 6 . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED

SEP 14 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSA l va r a do c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourte rr e d bynots uas pont e gr a nt i ng

hi m athi r d- l e ve l r e duc t i on f ora c c e pt a nc e of

r e s pons i bi l i ty . H e a r gue s tha tthe r e a s on c i t e d bythe gove rnm e ntf orr e f us i ng t o m a ke the m ot i on f orthe r e duc t i on, th a t h e r e s e rv e d h is r ig h t to ap p e a l, is a n im p e rm is s ib le r e a s o n u n d e rU .S .S .G . § 3 E 1 . 1 (b ). A s A l v arad o co n ced es, th i s arg u m en ti s fo recl o sed b y U ni ted States v. J ohns on , 58 1 F . 3d 99 4, 10 02 (9th C i r. 20 09 ), w here w e hel d thatthe expend i ture o f r e s o u r c e s in a n tic ip a tin g a n d p r e p a r in g f o ra n ap p e a l is a n ap p r o p r ia te consi dera t i on un der U . S . S . G . § 3 E 1. 1(b). AF F I RME D.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Agritech, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yu Chang, the Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1.  
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




August
      13, 2010
              /s/ Yu ChangYu ChangChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

 

SECTION 135OCERTIFICATION

 

In connection with this annual report of ML Futures Investments L.P.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(this “Report”), I, Michael L. Pungello, Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 

Date: March 31, 2006

 
| By | /s/ MICHAEL L. PUNGELLO |   |
|----|-------------------------|--------|

Michael L. Pungello

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

and Treasurer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
FOR THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
      e)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;f)
    
    [Reserved]g)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andh)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  c)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andd)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/
John
M. HughesName: John M. HughesTitle: Chief Financial Officer
June 19,---2014 

Memorandum 

Subject: Oil and Gas Advance Notice of Proposed Rule (ANPR) Making Conference Call 

From: Gregory Green, Director 

Outreach and Information Division 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) 

To: Docket- EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0151 

Participants: William Wehrum, Hunton and Williams 

Laura Bunte, EPA, OAQPS 

Gregory Green, EPA, OAQPS 

This memorandum to docket provides a brief summary of the discussion between William Wehrum 

representing parties in the oil and gas industry, Laura Bunte, and myself. Mr. Wehrum had three issues 

of concern: 

1. Mr. Wehrum expressed a concern that the 45 day comment period may not be sufficient time to 

develop and submit a comprehensive set of comments to the ANPR and questioned whether or 

not the Agency would be willing to consider extending the comment period by 15 days. He did 

say that if we objected, he would not pursue this but at some point may ask us to amend certain 

parts of the final rule where he felt the Agency may have erred. 

I responded that when you consider we have to evaluate the comments we received from the 

ANPR, develop a proposed action, and finalize that action between now and March 2, 2016, we 

will already have difficulty meeting the schedule required to get all of this done. I felt extending 

the comment period would make this task even harder. 

2. Mr. Wehrum then asked if we intended on addressing the prohibition in the Tribal New Source 

Review (NSR) rule of issuing general permits or permits by rule to synthetic minor sources as he 

had not seen any reference to this issue in the ANPR. 

I informed Mr. Wehrum that we had not addressed this issue in the ANPR since we were 

addressing it in the first bundle of general permits/permits by rule for minor sources on tribal 

lands that I expected to be promulgated in the next few weeks. 

3. Mr. Wehrum's final question concerned the possible development of a Federal Implementation 

Plan (FIP) for oil and gas sources on tribal lands. He informed us that some representatives of 

the industry were very concerned about a possible FIP and questioned the legality of this 

approach. Essentially he wondered if this alternative (the other two being general permits or 

permits by rule) was the leading contender of the three options we were considering. 

I explained to Mr. Wehrum that this option came out of a discussion with Region 8 on how to 

deal with areas of extensive oil and gas development on tribal lands that were close to 

nonattainment. We are concerned that if we don't address existing sources in some manner, 

that the rapid growth of new and modified sources in these areas may cause future violations of 
the standard. We feel th~t a FIP may be one way to address this issue, but at this time this 

option is only under consideration and carries no more weight than the other two options. Once 

we have an opportunity to evaluate the comments to the ANPR, we will make a decision on how 

to proceed.
EXHIBIT 12.2

            CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Healthcare Technologies Ltd. on Form
20-F for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eran Rotem, Chief
Financial Officer of Healthcare Technologies Ltd. certify (pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002) that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Healthcare
Technologies Ltd.

                                               HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.

                                               By: /s/ Eran Rotem
                                               ------------------
                                               Eran Rotem
                                               Chief Financial Officer

Date: July 7, 2004
#### Buckles v. 7th Judicial Court

OP 16-0517

10/18/16

Denied

Original Proceeding Supervisory Control
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
HEADQUARTERS
8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD
FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA 22060-6221

October 1, 2018
MEMORANDUM FOR ALL DLA EMPLOYEES

SUBJECT: Ethical Standards in All We Do

DLA’s mission to sustain the Warfighter can only be accomplished by maintaining the
highest level of ethical conduct. The ethical standards we abide by must be a part of everything
that we do. The Ethical Standards Memorandum for all DLA employees I signed in March
provides a valuable framework for your decision making. Employees with clear ethical
standards excel.

Remember, we serve the Warfighter, the U.S. taxpayer, and not our own personal
interests. When traveling on orders, engaging with contractors, or making official decisions that
can impact your investments, remain vigilant of actions that benefit you personally or even
appear to. As we continue the push to engage with industry to harness their capabilities to help
us solve the Warfighter challenges, we must remain scrupulous about following the ethics rules.

We owe our allegiance to the Constitution and the laws under it. So, remain fair,
impartial, and transparent with every decision. Make it systematic and clear for all to view. Do
not operate in the gray area, or as Secretary Mattis indicated in his September 13, 2018,
memorandum (attached), “we must all set the example.” Understand the rules and always do the
right thing.

D Ke WILLIAMS
Lieutenant General, USA
Director

Attachments:

Secretary Mattis’ Memo, Ethical Sentinels, September 13, 2018

Secretary Mattis’ Memo, Ethical Standards for All Hands, August 4, 2017
DLA Director’s Memo, Ethical Standards, March 26, 2018
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Lijun Peng, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of CHINA
      AGRITECH, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.  
      The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
      2007 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  
      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 14th
      day of November, 2007.




/s/
      Lijun Peng





Lijun
      Peng


Chief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Agritech, Inc. and will be retained by China Agritech, Inc. and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





The
      forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      and
      is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
      made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
      language in such filing.
Montana Fourth Judicial District Court. County of Missoula.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- RANDY STEINBACH, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-13-089

DECISION

On March 22, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to the Montana State Prison for five (5) years to run consecutive the sentence in Sanders County Cause No. DC-12-018. Defendant received credit for time served in the amount of seventy-nine (79) days. The terms and conditions of the suspended portion of the Judgement are the same as those contained in the Judgment filed with the Court on June 20, 2013.

On August 5, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Brent Getty of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of *84Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

Done in open Court this 5th day of August, 2016.

DATED this 24th day of August, 2016.

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member and Hon. Brad Newman, Member.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (adopted pursuantto §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned President andChief Executive Officer of Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company forthe quarterly period ended April 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation of the Company.

 

Date: June 16, 2008

 
|   | /s/ Timothy J. Dodd                       |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   |                                      |
|   | Timothy J. Dodd                           |
|   | *President and Chief   Executive Officer* |

 

----
# C_2017041EN.01002601.xml

| 8.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 41/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 41/26

---

Corrigendum to List of competent authorities referred to in Article 3(2) of Council Regulation (EU) No 389/2012 (administrative cooperation in the field of excise duties)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 484 of 24 December 2016
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 484 of 24 December 2016

(2017/C 41/11)

On page 34, 10th indent:

for:

for:

| ‘— | in Finland
  Tulli’, |
| --- | --- |

‘—

in Finland

Tulli’,

read:

read:

| ‘— | in Finland
  Verohallinto’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

in Finland

Verohallinto’.

---