alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1(c)


                         ADDENDUM TO INDENTURE OF LEASE

         THIS ADDENDUM TO INDENTURE OF LEASE is made as of the 1st day of May,
1999, between DANIEL FLOHR and TINA JACOBS (collectively "Landlord") and C-PHONE
CORPORATION (formerly Target Technologies, Inc.) ("Tenant").

                                    RECITALS

A.       Landlord and Tenant entered into an Indenture of Lease as of May 1,
         1993, pertaining to certain real estate and improvements thereon
         located at 6714 Netherlands Drive, Wilmington, North Carolina
         ("Lease").

B.       The Lease was extended for an additional three years ("First Renewal
         Term") in accordance with the terms of the Lease by written addendum
         executed by Landlord and Tenant and effective as of May 1, 1996.

B.       The First Renewal Term of the Lease was for three years ending April
         30, 1999 with the right of Tenant to renew for an additional three year
         period subject to certain provisions contained in the Lease.

C.       Tenant desires to exercise its Second Renewal Option as defined in the
         Lease and Landlord and Tenant have agreed to new terms for the net
         rent.

D.       Capitalized  terms used herein but not otherwise  defined  herein shall
         have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Lease.

                                   AGREEMENTS

1.       Landlord  hereby waives the written notice of exercise by Tenant of the
         Second Renewal Option as set forth in Section 23.02 of the Lease.

2.       Landlord and Tenant agree that the annual net rent for the Second
         Renewal Term shall be the same as for the First Renewal Term in the
         amount of $75,360.00 payable in monthly payments of $6,280.00;
         provided, however, Landlord shall have the option to adjust the Net
         Rent effective May 1, 2000, to the Fair Market Rent for the balance of
         the Second Renewal Term. For the purposes of determining the Fair
         Market Rent, the terms and provisions of Section 23.04(b) of the Lease
         shall apply with the exception that Landlord shall give Tenant a Rent
         Notice setting forth Landlord's Determination of the Fair Market Rent
         no later than January 31, 2000.

3.       All other terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain unmodified and
         in full force and effect.

<PAGE>


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have duly executed this
instrument as of the day and year first above written.


LANDLORD:                               TENANT:

/s/ DANIEL P. FLOHR                     C-Phone Corporation
-------------------
Daniel Flohr
                                        By: /s/ PAUL ALBRITTOM
                                            ------------------------------------
/s/ TINA JACOBS                                 Paul Albritton, Vice President &
-------------------                             Chief Financial Officer
Tina Jacobs
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-42,081-05

IN RE JOHN A. VALLAIR, III, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 07-00433 IN THE 252ND DISTRICT COURT

FROM JEFFERSON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus under this

Court’s original jurisdiction. He contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in

Jefferson County and his application has not been properly forwarded to this Court.

Respondent, the District Clerk of Jefferson County, shall forward Relator’s habeas

application to this Court, respond that Relator has not filed a habeas application in Jefferson County,

or forward a copy of an order designating issues together with correspondence documenting the date

the State received Relator’s habeas application. See TEX. CODECRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(c) and

(d); TEX.R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(5). This motion for leave to file will be held. Respondent shall comply

with this order within thirty days from the date of this order.
2

Filed: December 8, 2021

Do not publish
No. 09-8681.

#### Jeffrey Matthews, Petitioner v. Randall G. Workman, Warden.

559 U.S. 1014, 130 S. Ct. 1900,

176 L. Ed. 2d 378,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2715.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 577 F.3d 1175.
No. 09-8146.

#### George P. Minter, Petitioner v. Indiana.

559 U.S. 976, 130 S. Ct. 1693,

176 L. Ed. 2d 188,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2165.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District, denied.
No. 11-504.

#### Joel D. Joseph, Petitioner v. Cuneo Law Group, P.C., et al.

565 U.S. 1094, 132 S. Ct. 854,

181 L. Ed. 2d 551,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 9010.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 428 Fed. Appx. 6.
# C_2016470EN.01000201.xml

| 16.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 470/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 470/2

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections or the measure does not constitute aid

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 470/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 13.6.2016 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.41193 (15/N) |
| Member State | Germany |
| Region | KIEL, KRFR.ST.,
  DEUTSCHLAND | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | ‘Green-Port’ Kiel: Landstromanlage Norwegenkai — Seehafen Kiel
  GmbH & Co. KG |
| Legal basis | GRW-Koordinierungsrahmen
  Richtlinie der Landeshauptstadt Kiel über die finanzielle Förderung außerhalb der
  Stadtverwaltung stehender Stellen |
| Type of measure | Individual aid | Seehafen Kiel GmbH & Co. KG |
| Objective | Environmental protection |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: EUR 0,3427 million |
| Intensity | 60 % |
| Duration (period) | — |
| Economic sectors | Service activities incidental to water transportation |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Landeshauptstadt Kiel |
| Fleethörn 9 |
| 24103 Kiel |
| DEUTSCHLAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

13.6.2016

Aid number

SA.41193 (15/N)

Member State

Germany

Region

KIEL, KRFR.ST.,

DEUTSCHLAND

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

‘Green-Port’ Kiel: Landstromanlage Norwegenkai — Seehafen Kiel

GmbH & Co. KG

Legal basis

GRW-Koordinierungsrahmen

Richtlinie der Landeshauptstadt Kiel über die finanzielle Förderung außerhalb der

Stadtverwaltung stehender Stellen

Type of measure

Individual aid

Seehafen Kiel GmbH & Co. KG

Objective

Environmental protection

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 0,3427 million

Intensity

60 %

Duration (period)

—

Economic sectors

Service activities incidental to water transportation

Name and address of the granting authority

Landeshauptstadt Kiel

Fleethörn 9

24103 Kiel

DEUTSCHLAND

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
Montana Fifth Judicial District Court. County of Beaverhead.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- DANIEL BOYD BANKS, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-13-3557

Done in open Court this 5th day of August, 2016.

DATED this 24th day of August, 2016.

DECISION

On March 31, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to the Montana Department of Corrections for a period of five (5) years, for the offense of Amended Count I: Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs, a Felony, in violation of §45-9-102, MCA. The Court granted credit for time served in the amount of 345 days.

On August 5, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant appeared by Vision Net from Dawson County Correctional Facility and was represented by Brent Getty of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member and Hon. Brad Newman, Member.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                         141,016
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          15,103
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 247,369
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          440,541
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,784
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,453,692
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   247,369
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               790,458
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (790,458)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.25

                    [PETERSON SULLIVAN P.L.L.C. LETTERHEAD]

November 3, 2000



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth St NW
Washington DC 20549

RE:  AUDITOR REINSTATEMENT

Peterson Sullivan PLLC resigned as the auditors of Delta Capital Technologies,
Inc., effective October 20, 2000.

Subsequent to that date, Peterson Sullivan PLLC has reached agreement with
Delta Capital Technologies to be reinstated as the auditors of Delta Capital
Technologies, Inc. The reinstatement is effective as of November 3, 2000.

No Form 8-K was filed by Delta Capital Technologies, Inc. for either the
resignation or the reinstatement of Peterson Sullivan PLLC as the auditors for
Delta Capital Technologies, Inc.

If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Ray Holmdahl at (206) 382-7777.

Very truly yours,

/s/ PS by RH 11/3
--------------------------------

PETERSON SULLIVAN PLLC

cae

cc:  Ms. Judy Miller
     Delta Capital Technologies, Inc.
| 1. | I am a duly authorized officer of BMW Financial Services NA, LLC; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | I have reviewed the terms of that certain Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 30, 1995 (the “Basic Servicing Agreement”), between Financial Services Vehicle Trust (the                  “Trust”) and BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”), as supplemented by the 2017-2 Servicing Supplement, dated as of October 25, 2017 (together with the Basic Servicing Agreement, the “Servicing                  Agreement”), among the Trust, BMW Manufacturing L.P., as grantor and initial beneficiary of the Trust, and BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, as sponsor and as Servicer, and I have made, or have caused to be made under my supervision, a                  review of the activities of the Servicer and the performance of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement during the period from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | to the best of my knowledge, based on the review described in paragraph 2 above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all                  material respects during the period from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Timothy J. Dodd, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dakota Growers PastaCompany, Inc.;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and wehave:

 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisquarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)presented in this quarterly report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a)all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controlswhich could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’sauditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls; and

 

6.The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in thisquarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controlssubsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any correctiveactions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

Date:  December 15,2004

 
|   | /s/ Timothy J. Dodd                   |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                  |
|   | Timothy J. Dodd                       |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3884 STANDARD 40.06 5.50 19.54

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Shade Number COYOTE 498 Piece/Roll Number 3884

DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT April 25, 2021

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, FLAME RESISTANT, JP-8 FUEL 

PROTECTIVE GL/PD-10-09

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.43

Fiducia Ltd.
Fourth Floor
British America Building
P.O. Box HM3143
Hamilton, Bermuda HM NX

                                                                January 11, 2001

Ladies and Gentlemen,

          In connection with the proposed recapitalization of ourselves and our
subsidiary, APCOA/Standard Parking, Inc. ("APCOA"), Fiducia Ltd. ("you" or
"Fiducia") agreed to have its cash interest payments delayed until March 15,
2007 (the "Waiver") on approximately $29.9 million aggregate principal amount
($35.1 million face amount) of our 11 1/4% Senior Discount Notes due 2008 owned
by you (the "Notes").

          As consideration for the Waiver, we agree to pledge to you
approximately 20.4169 shares of Series C Preferred Stock issued by APCOA and
owned by us with a current aggregate liquidation preference of approximately
$30,779,166 million (the "Pledged Preferred Stock"), to secure our payment
obligations under the Notes. We will use our best efforts to enter into
customary agreements within 60 days of the date hereof, to facilitate our
granting you a security interest in the Pledged Preferred Stock. Our obligation
to grant you this security interest is wholly conditioned on the effectiveness
of the Waiver.

          The internal law of the state of New York shall govern and be used to
construe this Agreement.

                                              AP Holdings, Inc.

                                              By:
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 Name:
                                                 Title:

                            [acknowledgment follows]

<Page>

ACKNOWLEDGED

Fiducia Ltd.

By:
    ----------------------
     Name:
     Title:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
       ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quinton Cardiology Systems,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
John R. Hinson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                                      /s/ JOHN R. HINSON
                                                    ------------------------
                                                    John R. Hinson
                                                    Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 9, 2005
No. 11-7299.

#### Robert Ramsey, Petitioner v. Mary Berghuis, Warden.

565 U.S. 1127, 132 S. Ct. 1038,

181 L. Ed. 2d 764,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 283.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
#### Estate of A.H.E.

2016 MT 315N

DA 16-0304

11/29/16

Affirmed

Dist. 13 (Yellowstone)
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quinton Cardiology Systems (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R.
Hinson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.

                                           By: /s/ John R. Hinson
                                               -------------------------
                                               John R. Hinson
                                               Chief Executive Officer

      Date: November 9, 2004
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, theundersigned Chief Financial Officer of Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2003 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation of the Company.

 

Date:  June 16, 2003

 
|   |   | /s/  Thomas P. Friezen    |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   |   |                      |
|   |   | Thomas  P. Friezen        |
|   |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

1

----
No. 09-8434.

#### Detwonne Monshay Alexander, Petitioner v. Texas.

559 U.S. 1010, 130 S. Ct. 1886,

176 L. Ed. 2d 370,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2618.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Sixth District, denied.

*371Same case below, 282 S.W.3d 143.