alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4972 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4972

To permit certain school districts in Illinois to be reconstituted for 
    purposes of determining assistance under the Impact Aid program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2006

   Mr. Kirk introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permit certain school districts in Illinois to be reconstituted for 
    purposes of determining assistance under the Impact Aid program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR IMPACT AID PAYMENT.

    (a) Local Educational Agencies.--Notwithstanding section 8013(9)(B) 
of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
7713(9)(B)), North Chicago Community Unit School District 187, North 
Shore District 112, and Township High School District 113 in Lake 
County, Illinois, and Glenview Public School District 34 and Glenbrook 
High School District 225 in Cook County, Illinois, shall be considered 
local educational agencies as such term is used in and for purposes of 
title VIII of such Act.
    (b) Computation.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
federally connected children (as determined under section 8003(a) of 
the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7703(a))) 
who are in attendance in the North Shore District 112, Township High 
School District 113, Glenview Public School District 34, and Glenbrook 
High School District 225 described in subsection (a), shall be 
considered to be in attendance in the North Chicago Community Unit 
School District 187 described in subsection (a), solely for purposes of 
computing the amount that the North Chicago Community Unit School 
District 187 is eligible to receive under subsection (b) or (d) of such 
section, if--
            (1) such school districts have entered into an agreement 
        for such students to be so considered and for the equittable 
        apportionment among all such school districts of any amount 
        received by the North Chicago Community Unit School District 
        187 under such section; and
            (2) any amount apportioned among all such school districts 
        pursuant to paragraph (1) is used by such school districts only 
        for the direct provision of educational services.
                                 <all>
```
No. 09-8050.

#### Jerry Lewis Dedrick, Petitioner v. Texas.

559 U.S. 949, 130 S. Ct. 1529,

176 L. Ed. 2d 129,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1384.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District, denied.
1The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-2646

___________

In re: Stephen B. Young, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Petitioner. * District of Minnesota

* [UNPUBLISHED]

___________

Submitted: March 16, 2001

Filed: June 5, 2001

___________

Before MURPHY, LAY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Steven B. Young, on behalf of his clients Associated Contract Loggers, Inc., and

Olson Logging, Inc., filed a lawsuit in United States District Court for the District of

Minnesota against the United States Forest Service and two not-for-profit groups,

Forest Guardians and Superior Wilderness Action Network. See Associated Contract

Loggers, Inc., et al. v. United States Forest Service, et al., No 99-CV-1485. The suit

alleged a violation of the Establishment Clause. After dismissing the suit pursuant to

Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), the district court1 ordered Young to show cause as to why

sanctions should not be imposed against him for initiating a lawsuit without any

reasonable basis in law. After considering Young's brief in response to the Show
-2-

Cause order, the district court imposed sanctions of $5,000 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

11. Young appeals.

Finding that no error of law appears in the district court's opinion, and that

further opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm without discussion. See

8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
| **** |
|------|

**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| March 28, 2006

  | By:    | /s/    David A. Wheat                                                                                                                                                                                   |   |
|------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| (Date)

          |   |          David A. Wheat

        Director, Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

  |   |

 

 

 

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9449-9450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4564]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, March 
5, 2009 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(5), 
(7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at 
the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session and determined that no 
earlier notice thereof was possible.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
March 5, 2009 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature;
Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.


[[Page 9450]]


    Dated: February 26, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-4564 Filed 3-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                               SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                          REAL ESTATE PURCHASE CONTRACT


         THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO REAL ESTATE PURCHASE CONTRACT (this
"Amendment"), is made this 18th day of August, 1999 (the "Effective Date"), by
and between Home Interiors & Gifts, Inc. ("Seller") and Parker Equities, Inc.
("Purchaser").

                                    RECITALS:

         WHEREAS, on July 19, 1999, Purchaser and Seller entered into that
certain Real Estate Purchase Contract (the "Contract") relating to the purchase
and sale of seven office/warehouse buildings, as more particularly described
therein and amended by First Amendment to Real Estate Contract dated August 9,
1999; and

         WHEREAS, Purchaser and Seller now desire to enter into this Second
Amendment to amend the Contract.

         NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and
agreements herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Seller and Purchaser
hereby agree as follows:

         1. Title/Survey Objection Date. Notwithstanding the provisions of
Sections 3.2 and 3.3 of the Contract, Purchaser's right to object to title and
survey matters is hereby extended until August 24, 1999.

         2. Modifications. Except as expressly herein modified, the Contract
shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. Except as
otherwise expressly provided herein, all capitalized terms used but not defined
herein shall have the same meaning as that attributed to such terms in the
Contract.

         3. Effectiveness/Counterparts. This Amendment does not become effective
as an amendment to the Contract or otherwise until executed and delivered by
both Purchaser and Seller. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, and
facsimile signatures shall be deemed originals for all intents and purposes.

                                       PARKER EQUITIES, INC. ("PURCHASER")

                                       By: /s/ Jeff P. Howle
                                          ------------------------------------
                                            JEFF P. HOWLE, PRESIDENT

                                       HOME INTERIORS & GIFTS, INC. ("SELLER")

                                       By: /s/Bettina Simon
                                          ------------------------------------
                                       ITS: VP
                                           -----------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ GEOFFREY S. M. HEDRICK Geoffrey S. M. Hedrick Chief Executive Officer and DirectorDecember 14, 2010/s/ RONALD C. ALBRECHT Ronald C. Albrecht Chief Financial OfficerDecember 14, 2010


---



QuickLinks
No. 11-8860 (11A785).

#### Robert Brian Waterhouse, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 1187, 132 S. Ct. 1306,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1035,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1070.

February 15, 2012.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Thomas, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2017169EN.01002501.xml

| 30.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 169/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 169/25

---

Special Report No 8/2017

‘EU fisheries controls: more efforts needed’

(2017/C 169/16)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 8/2017 ‘EU fisheries controls: more efforts needed’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0182

IN THE MATTER OF:

A.D.Y.,

Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 14, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 8 2020

07/08/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0182
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

_______________________________

No. 95-30103 Summary Calendar

_______________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

JEREMIAH JOBE WHITE JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana (CR-94-50061-01)

_____________________________________________________

March 12, 1996

Before WISDOM, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jeremiah Jobe White Jr., appeals from his jury trial conviction and se ntence f or attem pt to

possess in excess of 500 grams of cocaine with the intent to distribute and conspiracy to commit the

same. He contends that the district court erred by denying him pretrial release, by preventing him

from filing pro se motions while represented by counsel, by refusing to order polygraph examinations

of sentencing witnesses, and by enhancing his sentence for obstruction of justice and for his role as

an organizer in the of

fense. In addition, White asserts that the Government improperly crossexamined him, that there is insufficient evidence to support his conviction, and that he received2

ineffective of counsel. Because the record is no t fully developed as to whether the alleged errors

c ommitted by White’s counsel constitute ineffective assistance, we dismiss this claim without

p rejudice. With respect to the other errors alleged by White, we have reviewed the reco rd and

perceive no reversible error.

The Government’s motion to strike evidence presented to this Court f o r the first time on

appeal is DENIED as unnecessary.

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
I, Timothy Whelan, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IPC Acquisition Corp.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures , or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b)  [omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238];  c)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.   Date:February 11, 2005 /s/ TIMOTHY WHELAN   Timothy Whelan Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly  Report of New England  Bancshares,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form  10-QSB/A for the period  ending  September 30, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, David J. O'Connor,  Chief  Executive  Officer and chief financial
officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


                             /s/ David J. O'Connor
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             David J. O'Connor
                             Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                             December 6, 2002
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alion
Science and Technology Corporation (the Corporation)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 14, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, John M. Hughes, Chief
Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                    
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and result of operations of the Corporation.

Date: April 28, 2003

| |     |                   
| | --- | ------------------
| | By: | /s/ John M. Hughes

| |                               
| | ------------------------------
| |                               
| | Name: John M. Hughes          
| | Title: Chief Financial Officer

32
***********************

* MONOGRAPH: 2B8

***********************

ITEM: Pineapple. Sweetened, Slices (Unitized B)

(PAS) Secondary

NSN: 8915-00-170-5168 ITEM 

SPECIFICATION:

US Stds for Grades

US Grade A or B

APPROXIMATE 

CALORIC VALUE:

112 Kilocalories

CHARACTERISTICS OF 

ITEM:

Appearance: Pineapple slices in syrup

Odor: Cooked fruit typical of canned pineapple

Flavor: Sweet, somewhat tart, cooked fruit typical of canned

DEFECTS LIKELY TO 

OCCUR:

Appearance: Darkened pineapple

Odor: Caramelized, oxidized or fermented odor

Flavor: Caramelized, oxidized, sour or fermented flavor

Texture: Woody or fibrous

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: Cans should be opened and the 

entire contents poured onto a flat white surface and examined under good lighting 

conditions.

SPECIAL NOTES: These defects may be present to a minor degree but they will 

increase in intensity with age of the product. The product should not be rejected until the 

defect renders the product unserviceable.
d1277738_ex4-5.htm







 


Exhibit 4.5


 







AMENDMENT TO RESTATED MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment to the Restated Management Agreement is made as of the 19th day of November, 2005, by and between Nordic American Tanker Shipping Limited, a Bermuda company (the "Company"), and Scandic American Shipping Ltd., a Bermuda company ("Scandic").


 


W I T N E S S E T H:


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Scandic are parties to a management agreement restated as of June 30, 2004, as further amended on October 12, 2004 and April 29, 2005 (the "Restated Management Agreement"); and


 


WHEREAS, the Company has agreed to provide employment to Scandic employees who are not directors or executive officers of Scandic upon the termination or expiration of the Restated Management Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and Scandic hereby agreed as follows:


 


1.           Section 4(e) of the Restated Management Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:


 


"The provisions of Section 3(b) and this Section 4 and the obligations of Company under Section 6(e) shall survive any termination of this Agreement."


 


2.           Section 6(e) is hereby added to Section 6 of the Restated Management Agreement and shall read in its entirety as follows:


 


"If this Agreement is terminated by the Company pursuant to this Section 6 or for any other reason, or is not extended for any reason upon the expiration of the term of this Agreement set forth in Section 2 above, the Company shall offer employment to each person who, as of the date of this Agreement is terminated or expires, is an employee of Scandic, provided that such person is not a director or executive officer of Scandic. Employment offered pursuant to this Section 6(e) to any employee of Scandic shall be upon terms that are substantially similar in all material respects to the terms of such employee's employment with Scandic which are in effect as of


 






  





  











  








the date this Agreement is terminated or expires, except to the extent such employee and the Company agree otherwise."


 


3.           The Restated Management Agreement shall otherwise remain in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment to the Restated Management Agreement as of the date first above written.


 



	/s/ illegible 	
NORDIC AMERICAN TANKER SHIPPING LIMITED


	/s/ Sir David Gibbons  	  
	/s/ Paul J. Hopkins  	  
	/s/ illegible  	
By:

	
/s/ George Lodge


	  	  	
Name: 


	  	  	
Title:


	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	  	
SCANDIC AMERICAN SHIPPING LTD.


	  	  
	  	  
	 	 	/s/ Herbjørn Hansson
	  	
By:

	
/s/ Andreas Ove Ugland


	  	  	
Name: 


	  	  	
Title:


	  	  	  
	  	  	  










 










2 of 2