alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018334EN.01023301.xml

| 19.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 334/233 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 334/233

---

P8_TA(2017)0294

Agreement to amend the Montreal Protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer, adopted in Kigali ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 5 July 2017 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer (07725/2017 — C8-0157/2017 — 2017/0016(NLE))

(Consent)

(2018/C 334/32)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (07725/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (07725/2017),

| — | having regard to the Kigali amendment to the Montreal Protocol, adopted at the twenty-eighth meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol, held in Kigali, Rwanda in October 2016, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Kigali amendment to the Montreal Protocol, adopted at the twenty-eighth meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol, held in Kigali, Rwanda in October 2016,

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 192(1) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0157/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 192(1) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0157/2017),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A8-0237/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A8-0237/2017),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the amendment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
EXHIBIT 10.29.3





PROMISSORY NOTE











$
39,287,885.27

July 8, 2010














Mission West Properties, L.P., Mission West Properties, L.P. I, Mission West Properties, L.P. II, and Mission West Properties, L.P. III (collectively referred to herein as “Mission”)





promises to pay to
The Berg Group





the principal sum of Thirty Nine Million Two Hundred Eighty Seven Thousand Eight Hundred Eighty Five Dollars and 27 Cents ($39,287,885.27),





plus interest at the rate of 30 day LIBOR plus 1.75 percent per annum (compounded on the basis of a 366-day year) beginning on the 8th day of July, 2010.





Should interest not so be paid, it shall thereafter bear like interest as the principal, but such unpaid interest so compounded shall not exceed an amount equal to simple interest on the unpaid principal at the maximum rate permitted by law. Should default be made in the payment of any installment of interest when due, the whole sum of principal and interest shall become immediately due and payable at the option of the holder of this note.  Should suit be commenced or an attorney employed to enforce the payment of this note, we agree to pay such additional sum as the court may adjudge as reasonable attorney’s fees in said suit. Principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States.





Principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States no later than September 30, 2010.  Notwithstanding the above, Mission shall use its best efforts to repay the loan as soon as possible using all available sources of cash, including but not limited to cash generated from operations and cash available from any other financing sources.








Signed By:
/s/ Raymond V. Marino

7/8/10Raymond V. Marino, Pres. & COO

DateMission West Properties, Inc.Its General Partner





Acknowledged:
/s/ Carl E. Berg

7/8/10Carl E. Berg

Date
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


 
EXHIBIT (10)(a) 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM 
 We hereby consent to the use in this Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4 (the
“Registration Statement”) of our report dated March 15, 2012, relating to the consolidated financial statements of New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corporation, and of our report dated February 17, 2012, relating to the
financial statements and financial highlights of New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corporation Variable Annuity Separate Account-III, which appear in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the references to us under the heading
“Financial Statements” in such Registration Statement. 
  

	
	
	/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
	PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
	New York, New York
	 April 4, 2012
No. 09-375.

#### Baldassare Amato, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 962, 130 S. Ct. 1502,

176 L. Ed. 2d 151,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1054.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 306 Fed. Appx. 630.
No. 09-8655.

#### Leonard V. Smith, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 961, 130 S. Ct. 1566,

176 L. Ed. 2d 150,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1193.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 340 Fed. Appx. 587.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,252
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                       918
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,619,783
<DEPRECIATION>                                 241,746
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,598,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,578,229
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,895,978
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,598,130
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               410,884
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  191,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              75,793
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                107,075
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            107,075
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   107,075
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.42


</TABLE>
# C_2016345EN.01000301.xml

| 21.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 345/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 345/3

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya apply

(2016/C 345/03)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 (2).

2

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DGC 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DGC 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/44.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the statement of reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

3

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 12, 19.1.2016, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

3

---
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00213-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE

OF VINCENT WILLIAMS AND DEBORAH L. WILLIAMS,

From the 52nd District Court

Coryell County, Texas

Trial Court No. CDN-14-42552

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Clerk of this Court notified Appellant by letter dated June 24, 2016 that 

Appellant must complete and file a docketing statement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1 

(“Promptly upon filing the notice of appeal in a civil case, the appellant must file in the 

appellate court a docketing statement ... “) (emphasis added).

When the docketing statement was not received, the Clerk then notified Appellant 

by letter dated July 22, 2016 that the Court had not received the docketing statement in 

this appeal and warned Appellant that if the docketing statement was not filed within 21 

days from the date of that letter, this appeal would be dismissed without further 

notification. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c); 44.3.
In the Matter of the Marriage of Williams Page 2

Because the docketing statement has not been filed, this appeal is dismissed. Id.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and 

Justice Scoggins

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed August 24, 2016

[CV06]
2006 Equity Incentive Plan Amendment



 Exhibit 10.13 
 HYPERION THERAPEUTICS, INC. 
 2006 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AMENDMENT

 April 15, 2011 
 The 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), adopted as of December 20, 2006, of Hyperion Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), is hereby
amended pursuant to Section 2(b)(vi) thereof to increase the number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued thereunder. 
  

	1.	DEFINITIONS 

 Capitalized
terms appearing herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Plan. 
  

	2.	AMENDMENTS 


Section 3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the text thereof in its entirety and replacing it with the following:

 “Subject to Section 9(a) relating to Capitalization Adjustments, the aggregate number of shares of
Common Stock of the Company that may be issued pursuant to Stock Awards after the Effective Date shall not exceed eight million eight hundred twenty three thousand one hundred eighty seven (8,823,187) shares. For clarity, the limitation in this
Section 3(a) is a limitation in the number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to the Plan. Accordingly, this Section 3(a) does not limit the granting of Stock Awards except as provided in Section 7(a). Furthermore,
if a Stock Award (i) expires or otherwise terminates without having been exercised in full or (ii) is settled in cash (i.e., the holder of the Stock Award receives cash rather than stock), such expiration, termination or settlement
shall not reduce (or otherwise offset) the number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to the Plan.” 

Section 3(c) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the text thereof in its entirety and replacing it with the following:

 “Incentive Stock Option Limit. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Section 3(c),
subject to the provisions of Section 9(a) relating to Capitalization Adjustments, the aggregate maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to the exercise of Incentive Stock Options shall be eight million eight hundred
twenty three thousand one hundred eighty seven (8,823,187) shares of Common Stock.” 








	3.	MISCELLANEOUS 

 Except as
modified by this amendment, which shall be effective as of the date first written above, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect, enforceable in accordance with its terms. 

[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] 

  
 2 








 To record the adoption of this Amendment to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan by the Board as
of the date first written above, the Company has caused its authorized officer to execute this amendment. 
  

			
	Hyperion Therapeutics, Inc.
		
	By:	 	    /s/  Donald J. Santel
	Name:	 	Donald J. Santel
	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer
No. 09-7250.

#### Antoine Tucker, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1009, 130 S. Ct. 1880,

176 L. Ed. 2d 369,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2733.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 339 Fed. Appx. 150.
No. 09-392.

#### Virgil Moran, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1005, 130 S. Ct. 1879,

176 L. Ed. 2d 362,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2640.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 573 F.3d 1132.
No. 11-7133.

#### Adan Molina, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1085, 132 S. Ct. 829,

181 L. Ed. 2d 537,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8742.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 744.
# C_2018346EN.01024001.xml

| 27.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/240 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/240

---

P8_TA(2017)0370

Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in the Czech Republic *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 4 October 2017 on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in the Czech Republic (09893/2017 — C8-0197/2017 — 2017/0806(CNS))

(Consultation)

(2018/C 346/34)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the Council draft (09893/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Council draft (09893/2017),

| — | having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0197/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0197/2017),

| — | having regard to Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (1), and in particular Article 33 thereof, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (1), and in particular Article 33 thereof,

| — | having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0288/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0288/2017),

| 1. | Approves the Council draft; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

---

(1)  OJ L 210, 6.8.2008, p. 1.

---
#### Guardianship of G.O.

2016 MT 298N

DA 16-0011

11/15/16

Affirmed

Dist. 8 (Cascade)
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 39 (Monday, March 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4310]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AMERICAN BATTLE MONUMENTS COMMISSION


SES Performance Review Board

AGENCY: American Battle Monuments Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members of the 
ABMC Performance Review Board.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Theodore Gloukhoff, Director of 
Personnel and Administration, American Battle Monuments Commission, 
Courthouse Plaza II, Suite 500, 2300 Clarendon Boulevard, Arlington, 
Virginia 22201-3367, Telephone Number: (703) 696-6908.
    American Battle Monuments Commission SES Performance Review Board.
    Mr. Wilbert Berrios, Director, Corporate Information, U.S. Army 
Corps of Engineers.
    Mr. Michael Ensch, Chief, Operations and Regulatory CoP, U.S. Army 
Corps of Engineers.
    Mr. Mohan Singh, Chief, Interagency & International Services 
Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Theodore Gloukhoff,
Director, Personnel and Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-4310 Filed 2-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6120-01-P
No. 09-8390.

#### Derick Lashawn Reed, Petitioner v. Florida.

559 U.S. 994, 130 S. Ct. 1743,

176 L. Ed. 2d 217,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2306.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, denied.

Same case below, 23 So. 3d 729.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6493

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DEANTE DRAKE, a/k/a Panama, a/k/a Shawn, a/k/a Papa Bear,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, 

District Judge. (1:07-cr-00053-IMK-JES-1; 1:13-cv-00253-IMKJES)

Submitted: August 20, 2015 Decided: August 24, 2015

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Deante Drake, Appellant Pro Se. Shawn Angus Morgan, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Deante Drake seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as successive, and the order 

denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend the 

judgment. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that

Drake has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 09-7890.

#### Bruno Rocha, Petitioner v. Florida.

559 U.S. 944, 130 S. Ct. 1514,

176 L. Ed. 2d 123,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1145.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District, denied.
No. 11-7283.

#### Christopher J. Scroggins, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1099, 132 S. Ct. 861,

181 L. Ed. 2d 561,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8840.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 648 F.3d 873.
No. 11-6428.

#### Brian T. St. Martin, Petitioner v. Wisconsin.

565 U.S. 1117, 132 S. Ct. 1003,

181 L. Ed. 2d 745,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 371.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin denied.

Same case below, 334 Wis. 2d 290, 800 N.W.2d 858.
No. 09-7018.

#### Pedro Godinez-Ortiz, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1009, 130 S. Ct. 1879,

176 L. Ed. 2d 369,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2729.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 763 F.3d 1022.
No. 11-7477.

#### Lyndon Marlon Baptist, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1132, 132 S. Ct. 1053,

181 L. Ed. 2d 773,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 17.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 646 F.3d 1225.