alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period through February 3, 2011.

For information, contact Roger Rosa, Ph.D., Executive Secretary, Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Department of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 715H, Mailstop P12, Washington, DC 20201, telephone 202/205-7856 or fax 202/260-4464.

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                

Dated: February 13, 2009.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E9-4322 Filed 2-27-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
#### Marriage of Jardine & Schwartz

2016 MT 321N

DA 16-0332

12/06/16

Affirmed

Dist. 13 (Yellowstone)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1531

WILLIAM F. ALLEN, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. CHAPMAN, Social Security Disability

Law Judge,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District

Judge. (CA-99-44-1)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 22, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William F. Allen, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

William Allen, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Allen v.

Chapman, No. CA-99-44-1 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 25, 1999). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 09-426.

#### Donald S. Eklund, Petitioner v. Wheatland County, Montana, et al.

559 U.S. 936, 130 S. Ct. 1503,

176 L. Ed. 2d 109,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1173.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Montana denied.

Same case below, 351 Mont. 370, 212 P.3d 297.
EPA Registration Jacket 3008-99
No. 09-687.

No. 09-845.

#### UNC Lear Services, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, et al. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, et al., Petitioners v. UNC Lear Services, Inc., et al.

559 U.S. 971, 130 S. Ct. 1689,

176 L. Ed. 2d 180,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2091.

March 1, 2010.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same cases below, 581 F.3d 210.
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-12-0557 SAT Date: 12/21/2012 Print Date: 9/25/2013

Related cases : Health related cases : Ecotox related cases: Analogs:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 2

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1-3 1-3 1

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: LUNG; N EURO; IRR; AQUATOX Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: FATE: Estimations for low weight 2-methylpentane MW 86 C6H14 log Kow = 3.21 (E) S = <0.001 to 1.8 mg/L at 25 C (E for component range), 14 mg/L at 25°C (M for low weight) VP = <1.0E-6 to 168 torr at 25 C ( N OMO5 for component range), 211 torr (M for low weight) BP ) H = 1.71 (E) log Koc = 2.04 (E) log Fish BCF = 1.79 (E) log Fish BAF = 2.03 (E)POTW removal (%) = 0-99 via sorption and stripping Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = da->mo Sorption to soils/sediments = moderate - v.strong Volatilization half-life from a standard river = 1 hrs Volatilization half-life from a standard lake = 4 da Atmospheric Oxidation Half-life = 24 hr via OH radical PBT Potential: P1-3B1-3 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl - moderate

Health : Health Summary: Absorption of the lower molecular weight components is expected to be good all routes. Concern for solvent neurotoxicity and irritation and for chemical p neumoni a

. Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 65 daphnid 48-h LC50 37 green algal 96-h EC50 27 fish

_ chronic value 6.4 daphnid

_ chronic value 3.6
algal

_ chronic value 7.2
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for neutral organic chemicals; SAR chemical class = hydrocarbon; MW 78 (representative structure); log Kow = 1.99 (EPI); liquid with mp unknown (P); S ≤ 1.8 g/L at 25 C (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;
Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 360

SARs neutral organic chemicals SAR Class hydrocarbon Ecotox Category N eutral Organics
Ecotox Factors Comments:SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DARRYL PRICE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 75 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Published Opinion and Order of 

the Superior Court at No. 599 EDA 

2016, at 203 A.3d 264 (Pa. Super. 

2019) entered on January 28, 2019, 

affirming the Judgment of Sentence 

of the Philadelphia County Court of 

Common Pleas at No. CP-51-CR0009035-2014 entered on December 

30, 2015

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of August, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED. The order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED

for further review consistent with Commonwealth v. Hicks, __ A.3d ___, 2019 WL 

2305953 (Pa. May 31, 2019).
No. 09-608.

#### Sincerely Yours, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Bertram Cooper, et al.

559 U.S. 971, 130 S. Ct. 1688,

176 L. Ed. 2d 180,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2164.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 577 F.3d 479.
C O U R T O F A P P E A LS EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEXAS ELPASO, TEXAS GI L L ES L . DEL I SL E and HEL GA DEL I SL E, Ap pe lla nts , v. GMF, I nc., Appellee
. § § § § § § No. 08-08-00327- CV

Appea l from the 12 0th Di stric t Co ur

t of El Paso County , Texas (TC#2007-3960)
M EM OR

AN DU MOP IN ION Appellants move to volu n tarily dismiss their interlocutor y appea l of a Nove mber 5, 2008, order of the trial c ourt denying the ir specia l appea ra n ce motions, pursuant to T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(a) (1). The Appellants no l o n g er w ish to pursue this appeal. The Court concludes that the mot ion sh ou ld b e g ra

nte d. Th e re fo re , w e dis mis s the a pp e a l w ithc os ts t axed

a g a ins t th e Ap pe lla

nts since ther e is no agree ment otherwise. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(d).

GUADA LUPE RIVERA, J ustice Marc h 19, 2009 B e f o r e C h e w , C
. J. , M c C l ur e , a n d R i v e r a , JJ.
MEMORANDUM

To : File
From : Tab Tesnau Subject : Conference call with the Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials (ASTSWMO)
Date : October 15, 2010

On October 15, 2010, EPA attended a conference call with a few representatives from the
Association of State and Territo rial Solid Waste Management Officials (ASTSWMO) to discuss their comments on state regulator y stringency issues and to discuss State Agency’s comments on the petition process.

EPA asked clarifying questions regarding the comme nts and on the structure of state beneficial

use programs.

Attendees: Charles Johnson, ASTSWMO, Municipal D Waste Task Force Chair Kerry Callahan, ASTSWMO, Solid Wast e and Sustainability Staff Associate George Faison, EPA, ORCR Truett Degeare, EPA, ORCR Tab Tesnau, EPA, ORCR
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

In re : BROADCOM CORPORATION,

Petitioner

______________________

2022

- 135

______________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States

District Court for the Western District of Texas in No. 6:21

-

cv

- 00542

- ADA, Judge Alan D. Albright.

______________________

ON PETITION

______________________

Upon consideration of the parties’ joint request to withdraw this petition “with each party to bear its own costs,

expenses, and attorneys’ fees, ” Mot. at 4,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

The petition is withdrawn.

May 10 , 2022

Date F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court Case: 22-135 Document: 14 Page: 1 Filed: 05/10/2022
Exhibit 35.13



|     |  |                                                                                                          
|---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing D1050-084, 8th
Fl 401 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2017, by and among WELLS FARGO
COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as General Special Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer and as NCB
Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2017-BNK7 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify
that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the period from September 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during
such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of
February 2018.





LOGO

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice
President

Wells Fargo Bank



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 129421 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129421 COA: 253125 Crawford CC: 02-002015-FC KEVIN JAMES ESTEP, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 2, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d1219 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2005

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          70,957
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  197,656
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          67,871
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 812,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        170,188
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           209
<OTHER-SE>                                     413,018
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   812,770
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               177,057
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  164,452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,115
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,828)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       484
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,312)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)




</TABLE>
No. 11-550.

#### Wendell F. Gilley, Petitioner v. Monsanto Company, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 1113, 132 S. Ct. 1026,

181 L. Ed. 2d 738,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 136.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

*739Same case below, 428 Fed. Appx. 883.
No. 09-8663.

#### Atsede Michael Oqubaegzi, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

559 U.S. 1014, 130 S. Ct. 1899,

176 L. Ed. 2d 377,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2633.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 352 Fed. Appx. 766.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MATTHEW DAVID LOPEZ, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4883 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed August 21, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Susan G. Barthle, Judge. Matthew David Lopez, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 2011); State v. Mancino, 705 So. 2d 1379 (Fla. 1998); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Vonador v. State, 915 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Pitts v. State, 832 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Labadie v. State, 840 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

MORRIS, SLEET, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

AH/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICARDO HENRY,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

C. M. HARRISON, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 07-55684

D.C. No. CV-05-03258-FMC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Florence-Marie Cooper, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 11, 2010** 

Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Ricardo Henry appeals from the district court’s

judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

FILED

JAN 26 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
AH/Research 07-55684

Henry contends that his due process right to a fair trial was violated because

there was insufficient evidence to support the convictions for first degree robbery,

first degree burglary, and attempted murder.

The district court properly determined that the California Court of Appeal

did not unreasonably apply Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979) in

determining that, taking the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution,

a rational factfinder could have found the essential elements of his convictions

beyond a reasonable doubt. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); see also Juan H. v. Allen,

408 F.3d 1262, 1275 (9th Cir. 2005). 

Henry’s motion to expand the certificate of appealability is denied. See 9th

Cir. R. 22-1(e); see also Hiivala v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th Cir. 1999)

(per curiam). 

AFFIRMED.
No. 09-675.

#### Butte County, California, et al., Petitioners v. Superior Court of California, Butte County, et al.

559 U.S. 938, 130 S. Ct. 1522,

176 L. Ed. 2d 112,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1182.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, denied.

Same case below, 175 Cal. App. 4th 729, 96 Cal. Rptr. 3d 421.
Exhibit 12.1





CERTIFICATE





I,
Jorge Rauber, certify that:





1. I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Central Puerto
S.A.;





2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;





4. The
company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
company and have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal
control over financial reporting; and





5. The
company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit
committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the company's internal
control over financial reporting.





Date:
April 27, 2018.





By:
/s/
Jorge RauberName:
Jorge
RauberTitle:
Chief
Executive Officer
No. 09-8366.

#### Wendy Wagener, Petitioner v. Ron Kenan, Warden.

559 U.S. 994, 130 S. Ct. 1742,

176 L. Ed. 2d 216,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2335.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 11M55.

#### Robert L. Jarrett, Jr., Petitioner v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, et al.

565 U.S. 1108, 132 S. Ct. 1072,

181 L. Ed. 2d 729,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 130.

January 9, 2012.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time under Rule 14.5 denied.

Same case below, 498 F.3d 963.
No. 09-8238.

#### Lawrence W. Price, Jr., Petitioner v. Ohio.

559 U.S. 978, 130 S. Ct. 1701,

176 L. Ed. 2d 191,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2184.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.

Same case below, 122 Ohio St. 3d 1506, 912 N.E.2d 109.