alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
steam_record - Re: 

 

Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent 

guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case 

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date

of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, 

-----"Mitchell, Gregory J" <GMitchell@rrienergy.com> wrote: ----- 

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Mitchell, Gregory J" <GMitchell@rrienergy.com> 

Date: 06/28/2010 10:25AM 

Subject: 

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Mitchell, Gregory J" <GMitchell@rrienergy.com>

Date: 6/28/2010 3:59 PM

Subject: Re: 

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C28C6F1DO... 3/17/2011
Ms. Alicea, 

Please find attached a request from RRI Energy, Inc. – Seward Power Plant, for 

consideration to extend the deadline for completion of the steam-electric generating facilities 

Effluent ICR requirements. 

If there are any questions on this request, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Thank you for your consideration in this matter and I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Sincerely,

Greg Mitchell

General Manager 

RRI Energy

Seward Power Plant

814-446-4650

[attachment "Seward Extension Request Letter 062410.pdf" removed by Jezebele 

Alicea/DC/USEPA/US] 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C28C6F1DO... 3/17/2011
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-51046

(Summary Calendar)

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FELIPE ZARAGOZA; RICARDO BRIBIESCA,

Defendants-Appellants.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(SA-95-CR-171-3-EP)

- - - - - - - - - -

November 1, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendants-Appellants Felipe Zaragoza and Ricardo Bribiesca

appeal from the sentences that they received on remand. Appellants

argue that the district court erred in applying the money

laundering guideline, U.S.S.G. § 2S1.1, rather than the fraud

guideline, U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1, in determining their sentences for

their money laundering convictions. This issue is barred by the

“law of the case” doctrine. United States v. Becerra, 155 F.3d

740, 752 (5th Cir. 1998). 
2

Bribiesca argues that the district court erred in finding that

he was not entitled to an adjustment for his minor role pursuant to

U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, erred in failing to make a sufficient factfinding on the matter, and erred in the manner in which it ordered

restitution in his case. These issues are beyond the scope of this

court’s remand order. United States v. Marmolejo, 139 F.3d 528,

530-31 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1056 (1998).

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
AFS-12-008-E October 31, 2011 Exemption No. 10178B Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-1012

Mr. Omer ErSelcuk

President/Chief Executive Officer Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines 1210 Watergut Christianstead, VI 00820

Dear Mr. ErSelcuk:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 10178, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated October 3, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines (Seaborne Airlines) for an extension of Exemption No. 10178, as amended, to June 30, 2012. That exemption from § 121.305(j) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Seaborne Airlines to continue to conduct domestic, flag, and supplemental operations in the islands of the Caribbean without installing a third gyroscopic bank and pitch indicator.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Seaborne Airlines.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10178, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 10178, as amended, to June 30, 2012 unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

David C. Gilliom Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards

Service
No. 11-6775.

#### Daniel David Dydzak, Petitioner v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

565 U.S. 1095, 132 S. Ct. 866,

181 L. Ed. 2d 554,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8958,

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Maximum Dynamics, Inc. a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Eric Majors, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the
best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Maximum Dynamics, Inc., and will be retained by Maximum Dynamics,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


/s/ Eric Majors
--------------------------
Eric Majors
Chief Executive Officer
August 18, 2003
September 2, 2016

Mr. Stephen Gowdy Gowdy Brothers Aerospace, LLC Consultant for Sterling Auc tion & Realty Services, LLC 8170 Old Carriage Court N. Suite #200 Shakopee, MN 55379

Re: FAA-2016-4526

Dear Mr. Gowdy:

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and
have determined that we will con tinue to process your petition.

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov , we are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 107 ( www.faa.gov/uas ) will satisfy your request. We have determined that your request requires further regulatory relief (T ier 3), and we will continue working on your petition for exemption.

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will publish a summary of your petition in the Federa l Register for public comments, if we have not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final deci sion on your petition as s oon as possible. If you have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,
/s/
Brenda Robeson Program Analyst
### Thomas A. Arcury, PhD

Professor and Vice Chair for Research, Department of Family & Community Medicine Director, Center for Worker Health Director, Program in Community Engagement Wake Forest School of Medicine

March 30, 2015

# Position • We do not have accurate knowledge of occupational injuries and illnesses experienced by hired agricultural workers, and therefore we should not abandon collecting surveillance data.
• NIOSH should institute an active surveillance system that collects data directly from hired agricultural workers so that accurate data on occupational injuries and illnesses can direct policy and programs.
2

## 1. Agricultural is a hazardous industry with 

## high rates of injury, illness and mortality • Research projects focused on adult agricultural workers routinely report high rates of injury and illness. • The limited research on youth agricultural workers reports high rates of injury and illness.

– Most studies of youth agricultural injuries are focused on children working on their own family farms. • In most states, agricultural injuries are not a reportable event. 3

## 2. Agriculture does not have the same 

## safety regulations as other industries. • Agriculture is exempt from many federal regulations, and many states have not implemented laws to address these gaps. • When safety regulations are present, research shows that these regulations are often not followed or enforced .
4

## 3. Passive surveillance based on reporting 

## of injuries and illnesses is insufficient. • Many workers do not seek health care or report injuries.
• Reporting systems often do not accurately capture occupational injuries of agricultural workers.
• Reporting systems greatly undercount injuries and illness of agricultural workers. 5

## 4. It is not appropriate to expect employers 

## to report the injuries and illnesses of workers. • They often do not know that a worker has been injured or is ill.
• It is often in their best interest not to report employee injuries or illnesses.

6

## 5. We need an active surveillance system 

## that asks workers directly about their work related injuries and illnesses. • Given the breath of the problem and the wide geographic distribution of workers, creative approaches to active surveillance need to be considered.
• A working group of occupational health experts and worker advocates should meet to develop creative approaches. 7
#### Norman D. Suttles, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Phoebe N. Burbridge, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February 11, 1926.

*Haley & Heintz*and *John W. Dodge,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Axtell & Rinehart,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record upon writ of error taken under the statute to the order of the Circuit Court granting a new trial herein, and the briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said order. It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said order be, and is hereby affirmed. The decision is controlled by Owens v. Wilson, 58 Fla. 335, 50 South. Rep. 674; Clary v. Isom, 55 Fla. 384, 45 South. Rep. 994; McLendon v. Lurton-Hardaker Co., 83 Fla. 263, 91 South. Rep. 113; Ruff v. Georgia, S. & F. R. Co., 67 Fla. 224, 64 South. Rep. 782; Carney v. Stringfellow, 73 Fla. 700, 74 South. Rep. 866; Farrell v. Salary, 43 Fla. 124, 31 So. 283; Herrin v. Avon, 87 Fla. 385, 100 So. Rep. 174; Gulf Refining Co. v. Howard, 82 Fla. 27, 89 South. Rep. 349; Cheyney v. Roberts, 77 Fla. 324, 81 South. Rep. 475; Beverly v. Hardaway, 66 Fla. 177, 63 South. Rep: 702; and notby Bishop v. Taylor, 41 Fla. 77, 25 South. Rep. 287; *274Philadelphia Underwriters’ Ins. Co., of North America v. Bigelow, 48 Fla. 105, 37 South. Rep. 210; Winn v. Coggins, 53 Fla. 327, 42 South. Rep. 897; Feinberg v. Stearns, 56 Fla. 279, 47 South. Rep. 797; Georgia Southern & F. R. Co. v. Hamilton Lumber Co., 63 Fla. 150, 58 South. Rep. 838; Nathan v. Thomas, 63 Fla. 235, 58 South. Rep. 247; Cotton States Belting *&*Supply Company v. Florida R. Co., 69 Fla. 52, 67 South. Rep. 568; Jackson Bros. Lumber Co. v. Yaeger & McCaskill, 80 Fla. 611, 86 South. Rep. 500; and Philips v. Lowenstein, filed January 23, 1926.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
No. 09-8039.

#### Kim June Galvan, Petitioner v. California.

559 U.S. 948, 130 S. Ct. 1528,

176 L. Ed. 2d 128,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1398.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District, denied.
# C_2016466EN.01001901.xml

| 14.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 466/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 466/19

---

Update with effect from 1 July 2016 of the rate of contribution to the pension scheme of officials and other servants of the European Union (1)

1

(2016/C 466/10)

The rate of the contribution referred to in Article 83(2) of the Staff Regulations shall be 9,8 %, with effect from 1 July 2016.

---

(1)  Eurostat Report on the 2016 actuarial assessment of the Pension Scheme for European Officials of 1 September 2016.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Mercari Communications Group, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), Tim F. Holderbaum, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Tim F. HolderbaumTim F. HolderbaumChief Financial OfficerDate:  August 30, 2010








This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $11.89 CWT 0.965 $11.4739

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.7955 LB 3.5 $6.2843

Class I Price $17.7581

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $12.07 CWT 0.965 $11.6476

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.7189 LB 3.5 $6.0162

Class I Price $17.6637

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.0944

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0081

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0041

Price change per quart $0.0020

Price change per pint $0.0010

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0008

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0006

Price change per half pint $0.0005

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.01

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.00

Price adjustment per quart $0.00

Price adjustment per pint $0.00

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: May 5, 2013
<PAGE>


Exhibit 99.2


                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cyber Public Relations, Inc. (the
    "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
    the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
    Maria Trinh, as President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
    certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
    Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of her knowledge,
    that:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


By:  /s/ Maria Trinh
--------------------

Maria Trinh
President and CFO
May 14, 2003
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, G-4 

500 ARMY PENTAGON

WASHINGTON, DC 20310

 

 

DALO-SPT 27 August 2018

SUBJECT: Rescind Memorandum, Over-Aged Operational Ration Extension Policy for 

Army Owned Rations

1. Reference Memorandum, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-4, subject: Over-Aged 

Operational Ration Extension Policy for Army Owned Rations, dated: 20 November 2012

2. Reference Memorandum is hereby rescinded.

3. My point of contact for this action is Mr. Dave Staples, Director of Operations, Joint 

Culinary Center of Excellence, Subsistence, 804-734-3345, 

David.p.staples2.civ@mail.mil. 

 John C. Skelly

DAC, GS-14

Branch Chief, Food Liquid 

Logistics and Field Services 

Division
# Box4_Table 4_Tetanus
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

Monograph No. BS5 

21 September 1992 

NSN: 8920-00-935-3262

Item: Bakery Mixes, Prepared, Chocolate Brownie Mix (Class 5) 

Document: MIL-B-44275A, Bakery Mixes, Prepared 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: NA Component Classification: Secondary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 24 months at 80°F 

Item Characteristics

Appearance: 

Dry bakery mix shall be a free flowing mix free from lumps that do not fall apart under 

light finger pressure. Uniform light brown color. 

Prepared brownies shall possess a brown crust. Slightly convex top surface free of 

cracks. Moist, dark brown, crumb. No large gas pockets or tunnels. 

Odor: Prepared brownies shall have a sweet baked chocolate odor. 

Flavor: Prepared brownies shall have a sweet baked chocolate flavor. Shall not be harsh or 

bitter chocolate. 

Texture: Dry mix shall be free flowing. 

Prepared brownies shall be moist, tender. The brownie shall be chewy but not gummy. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: 

Dry mix may darken in color and/or contain lumps that do not fall apart under light 

finger pressure. 

Prepared brownie may contain undissolved lumps and may not rise. 

Odor: Rancid, stale, oxidized, bitter, soapy, scorched, or other objectionable odors. 

Flavor: Rancid, stale, oxidized, bitter, soapy, scorched, or other objectionable flavors. 

Texture: 

Bakery mix may clump excessively, and not readily dissolve upon mixing or baking. 

Upon mixing the product may not readily attain a brownie batter consistency. 

Prepared brownie may contain undissolved lumps and/or may be gummy or dense. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Prepare as directed on label.
No. 09-8421.

#### Fariba Parniani, Petitioner v. Cardinal Health, Inc., et al.

559 U.S. 981, 130 S. Ct. 1708,

176 L. Ed. 2d 195,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2033.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

*196Same case below, 305 Fed. Appx. 301.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Clinical Trials.                    

*Date:*                         February 10, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         3 p.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Paul A. Amstad, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, DHHS/National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-402-7098,                         *pamstad@niaid.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 6, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-424 Filed 1-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
No. 09-7519.

#### Audel Acosta-Larios, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1009, 130 S. Ct. 1881,

176 L. Ed. 2d 369,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2747.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.