alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Power of Attorney, dated January 16, 2012, of Wenjun Wang



 Exhibit 4.70 
 [Translation of Chinese Original] 
 Power of Attorney 

Principal: Wenjun Wang 
 Address:
[                    ] 
 Attorney-in-Fact:
Beijing Super TV Co., Ltd. 
 Registered Address: 4-406 Jingmeng High-Tech Building B, No. 5-2 Shangdi East Road, 

Haidian District, Beijing 
 I,
Wenjun Wang, hereby irrevocably authorize Beijing Super TV Co., Ltd. (or its designated third party) to act as my Attorney-in-Fact and exercise the following rights during the term of this Power of Attorney: 

Beijing Super TV Co., Ltd. (or its designated third party) is authorized to exercise, as my plenipotentiary Attorney-in-Fact, all of the
rights to vote as a shareholder at the shareholders’ meetings of Beijing Novel-Super Digital TV Technology Co., Ltd. (“N-S Digital TV”), that I have under laws and the Article of Association of N-S Digital TV, including but not
limited to selling or transferring all or any part of my equity in N-S Digital TV and rights to vote, at the shareholders’ meetings of N-S Digital TV, on the nomination and appointment of directors of N-S Digital TV. 

I, the Principal, will assume all legal effects of all actions performed by the Attorney-in-Fact on my behalf under this Power of
Attorney. 
 The term of this Power of Attorney is 10 years, starting from the date of its execution, unless the Share Pledge
Agreement (Appendix 1) by and between Beijing Super TV Co., Ltd. and Wenjun Wang should terminate early for any reason. If the term of the Share Pledge Agreement (Appendix 1) is extended, that of this Power of Attorney shall be automatically
extended accordingly, always based on the last executed Share Pledge Agreement. All matters under this Power of Attorney shall be governed by laws of China. This Power of Attorney is written in Chinese. 

 

	
	Principal: Wenjun Wang
	
	 /s/ Wenjun Wang

	January 16, 2012









 Appendix 1 
 Share Pledge Agreement (Omitted)
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cobalis Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 (1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated:  August 19, 2005               By: /s/ Chaslav Radovich
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Chaslav Radovich
                                          Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Colony NorthStar Credit Real Estate, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sujan S. Patel, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 23, 2018 |  | /s/ Sujan S. Patel                                  
|                     |  | Sujan S. Patel
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C §1350 and shall not be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 09-8994.

#### Luis Rebolla-Sanchez, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1019, 130 S. Ct. 1916,

176 L. Ed. 2d 388,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2489.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 367 Fed. Appx. 738.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeWorking With DLAApplicationsDetails

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# IIG - Item Identification Guide

Access IIG **Access IIG: https://flisancillaryu.dla.mil/iig/

## Item Identification Guide (IIG) Information

**IIG Index** ** is a list of all IIGs currently available. For raw table data, please see our Catalog Tools Tables.

**DD Form 180/NATO Form AC135** ** (PDF download and open in Acrobat) is the automated Item Name Collaboration Action Request form. Upon completion, please email to the ** FIIGS@DLA.MIL mailbox.

----

## Assistance and Contact Information

Lines are open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, including government holidays

**DLA Customer Interaction Center (CIC)**

**Toll Free:**1-877-DLA-CALL

**Commercial:**269-704-7921

FICIIG
No. 09-8742.

#### Kimberly Albright-Lazzari, et vir, Petitioners v. Connecticut (two judgments).

559 U.S. 1034, 130 S. Ct. 2064,

176 L. Ed. 2d 412,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2898.

March 29, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Connecticut dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Amendment  to  Quarterly  report of Basic  Empire
Corporation  (the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB/A1 for the period ended March 31,
2005 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  I, Chang Yu, Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

          A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906
     has been provided to Basic Empire Corporation and will be retained by Basic
     Empire Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
     or its staff upon request.

Date:  June 8, 2005                     By: /s/ Chang Yu
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Chang Yu
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President
No. 11-7267.

#### Anthony William Den-ham, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1099, 132 S. Ct. 860,

181 L. Ed. 2d 560,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 9016.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 437 Fed. Appx. 772.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 318 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 318

       To reauthorize the National Geologic Mapping Act of 1992.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2019

  Mr. Lamborn (for himself and Mr. Brown of Maryland) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To reauthorize the National Geologic Mapping Act of 1992.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Geologic Mapping Act 
Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIONAL GEOLOGIC MAPPING ACT OF 1992.

    (a) Reauthorization.--
            (1) In general.--Section 9(a) of the National Geologic 
        Mapping Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 31h(a)) is amended by striking 
        ``2018'' and inserting ``2023''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 4(b)(1) of the National 
        Geologic Mapping Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 31c(b)(1)) is amended 
        by striking ``Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009'' each 
        place it appears in subparagraphs (A) and (B) and inserting 
        ``National Geologic Mapping Act Reauthorization Act''.
    (b) Geologic Mapping Advisory Committee.--Section 5(a)(3) of the 
National Geologic Mapping Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 31d(a)(3)) is amended 
by striking ``Associate Director for Geology'' and inserting 
``Associate Director for Core Science Systems''.
    (c) Clerical Amendments.--Section 3 of the National Geologic 
Mapping Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 31b) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (4), by striking ``section 6(d)(3)'' and 
        inserting ``section 4(d)(3)'';
            (2) in paragraph (5), by striking ``section 6(d)(1)'' and 
        inserting ``section 4(d)(1)''; and
            (3) in paragraph (9), by striking ``section 6(d)(2)'' and 
        inserting ``section 4(d)(2)''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 09-7791.

#### Kess Tani, Petitioner v. Brian Cedar, et al.

559 U.S. 942, 130 S. Ct. 1508,

176 L. Ed. 2d 119,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1222.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 344 Fed. Appx. 846.
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors
Solectron Corporation: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-69443,
333-46304, 333-46300, 333-40176, 333-34494, 333-92269, 333-75865, 333-85949, 333-89035, 333-75813,
333-24293, 333-02523, 333-17643, 333-56220, 333-56464, 333-60684, 333-64454, 333-69182, 333-73238,
333-74946, 333-84066, 333-96823, 033-58580, 333-46686, 033-57575, 033-75270, 033-33461, 033-58210,
333-83297, 333-02945, 333-15983, 333-49206, 333-84070, 333-102534, 333-102535, 333-107127, and
333-114447) on Forms S-3, S-4, and S-8 of Solectron Corporation of our report dated October 18,
2004, except as to note 2, which is as of April 11, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of Solectron Corporation and subsidiaries as of August 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity, comprehensive loss, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended August 31, 2004, and the related financial
statement schedule, which report appears in the August 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K/A of
Solectron Corporation. Our
report dated October 18, 2004, except as to note 2, which is as of April 11, 2005, contains an
explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has restated its consolidated financial
statements as of August 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended
August 31, 2004. Our
report, dated October 18, 2004, except as to note 2, which is as
of April 11, 2005, contains an
explanatory paragraph stating that effective September 1, 2001, the Company adopted the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. /s/  KPMG LLP Mountain View, California
April 11, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 48 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 48

To redesignate the White Rocks National Recreation Area in the State of 
  Vermont as the ``Robert T. Stafford White Rocks National Recreation 
                                Area''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

Mr. Welch of Vermont introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To redesignate the White Rocks National Recreation Area in the State of 
  Vermont as the ``Robert T. Stafford White Rocks National Recreation 
                                Area''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROBERT T. STAFFORD WHITE ROCKS NATIONAL RECREATION AREA.

    (a) Redesignation.--The White Rocks National Recreation Area in the 
State of Vermont, as established by section 202 of the Vermont 
Wilderness Act of 1984 (16 U.S.C. 460nn-1), is redesignated as the 
``Robert T. Stafford White Rocks National Recreation Area''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the recreation area 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
Robert T. Stafford White Rocks National Recreation Area.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10081 Summary Calendar

BERNARD J. DOLENZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JUDGE TED MARTIN AKIN, JOHN EARNEST BOUNDY, and MILDRED AVERY, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3-95-CV-1605

- - - - - - - - - - October 23, 1997 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Bernard Dolenz appeals the dismissal of his § 1983 complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 12(c). We have reviewed the record, and, for substantially the same reasons stated by the district court, we affirm the dismissal. See Dolenz v. Akin , No. 3:95-CV-1605-P (N.D. Tex. Mar. 6, 1996 and Jan. 14, 1997).No. 97-10081 -2- The district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow Dolenz to engage in further discovery pending its determination of the referenced motions to dismiss. Richardson v. Henry , 902 F.2d 414, 417 (5th Cir. 1990); Elliott v. Perez , 751 F.2d 1472, 1478 (5th Cir. 1985). As for Dolenz’s state-law claims, the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over those claims. See Cinel v. Connick , 15 F.3d 1338, 1344 (5th Cir. 1994). AFFIRMED.
************************ 

* MONOGRAPH NO.: 1C2 

**************** ******* 

ITEM: PORK RIBS, BONELESS, IMIATAION, (PRB) 

FORMED IN BARBEQUE SAUCE 

NSN: 8940-01-455-1882 ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR P 019 Poly Tray 

 8940-01-375-3234 PCR P 018 Tray Can 

 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM: 

APPEARANCE: MEAT: Approximate 2x4 x 1/4 inch thick boneless pork rib with three 

approximately 5/8 in. wide simulated ribs; uniform light brown surface color with very light 

pink interior; medium grind with no visible fat, gristle or objectionable material. 

SAUCE: thick dark reddish brown cohesive BBQ sauce. 

ODOR: Tomato based, slight hickory smoke. 

FLAVOR: MEAT: Cooked, low pork flavor. SAUCE: Spicy tomato base with moderate 

heat and hickory smoke. 

TEXTURE: MEAT: Moderately ground, moist and tender pork with a firm bite. SAUCE: 

Moderately thick smooth sauce. 

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT 80 DEGREES F: 36 months 

 100 DEGREES F: 6 months 

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES: 

APPEARANCE: Darkening of sauce and ribs; oil separation of the sauce. 

 ODOR: Rancid. 

FLAVOR: Rancid and/or metallic; loss of spice and pork profile. 

 

TEXTURE: Very dry meat and oil separation of the sauce. 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None
No. 09-9156.

#### Daniel E. Salley, Petitioner v. United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

559 U.S. 1023, 130 S. Ct. 1942,

176 L. Ed. 2d 394,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2454.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
No. 09-8435.

#### Rafael Venegas-Zamora, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 956, 130 S. Ct. 1551,

176 L. Ed. 2d 141,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1437.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 332 Fed. Appx. 395.
No. 11-6405.

#### Gregory T. Gary, Petitioner v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 587,

181 L. Ed. 2d 431,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8266.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

*432Same case below, 411 Fed. Appx. 605.
No. 09-504.

#### David Paul Hammer, Petitioner v. John D. Ashcroft, et al.

559 U.S. 991, 130 S. Ct. 1735,

176 L. Ed. 2d 212,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2290.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 570 F.3d 798.
No. D-2465.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Eddie Michael Pope.

559 U.S. 968, 130 S. Ct. 1734,

176 L. Ed. 2d 209,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1989.

March 1, 2010.

Eddie Michael Pope, of Austin, Texas, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.ss.1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Power
Technology, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended April 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned President, Treasurer and chief financial officer of the Company
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: June 19, 2003

                                      /s/ Lee A. Balak
                                      ---------------------------
                                      Lee A. Balak, President,
                                      chief financial officer and
                                      principal financial and accounting officer
No. 11-5024.

#### Tommy D. Alcorn, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1159, 132 S. Ct. 1090,

181 L. Ed. 2d 981,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 831.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

*982Same case below, 420 Fed. Appx. 393.
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $6.98 CWT 0.965 $6.7357

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.4875 LB 3.5 $8.7063

Class I Price $15.4420

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $8.30 CWT 0.965 $8.0095

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.5335 LB 3.5 $8.8673

Class I Price $16.8768

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT ($1.4348)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.1234)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.0617)

Price change per quart ($0.0308)

Price change per pint ($0.0154)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.0111)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.0093)

Price change per half pint ($0.0077)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.12)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.06)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.03)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.02)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.01)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.01)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.01)

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause).

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing 

Factors

Effective Date: Jan. 7, 2018