alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Glen W. Fausset, President and CFO of First National Bancshares, Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First National Bancshares, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(e) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;**(f) [This paragraph intentionally left blank.]**(g) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and(h) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 9, 2005         /s/ Glen W. Fausset         Glen W. Fausset, President & CFO
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Maximum Dynamics, Inc. a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Joshua Wolcott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of
          operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Maximum Dynamics, Inc., and will be retained by Maximum Dynamics,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

/s/ Joshua Wolcott
--------------------------
Joshua Wolcott
Chief Financial Officer
May 16, 2003
No. 09-769.

#### Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc., Petitioner v. Jimmy Lewis.

559 U.S. 972, 130 S. Ct. 1705,

176 L. Ed. 2d 183,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2146.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit, denied.

Same case below, 12 So. 3d 363.
Exhibit 31

Certifications

I, Paul
Vanderslice, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and
all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2017-C4 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2.    Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, all
of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation
AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related
attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in
such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above,
I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC.; U.S. Bank National Association; Berkeley Point
Capital LLC; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; KeyBank National Association; CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.; National Tax Search, LLC; and Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC.

Date:    March 29, 2018



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paul Vanderslice                                         
|Paul Vanderslice                                             
|President, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.     
|(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

CGCMT 2017-C4 Sarbanes-Oxley Certification (2017)
No. 09-8784.

#### David Lefevre, Petitioner v. Burl Cain, Warden.

559 U.S. 1016, 130 S. Ct. 1941,

176 L. Ed. 2d 381,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2553.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 586 F.3d 349.
No. 11-7309.

#### Margaret Zoellick, Petitioner v. Lee Zoellick.

565 U.S. 1162, 132 S. Ct. 1103,

181 L. Ed. 2d 988,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 717.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 19, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00891

- CV

WEBB COUNTY

, Appellant

v.

Juan C. Garcia LINO , Individually and as Representative of the Estates o f Suleika R. Fonseca

Saldivar, Deceased, and Alessandra Juliette Garcia, Deceased,

Appellees

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CVA000356D3

Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellees’ brief was due on March 17, 2020 and was timely filed that day. On

March 18, 2020, appellees filed an unopposed motion to extend their briefing deadline

u ntil March 23, 2020. Because appellees timely filed their brief, their motion to extend

the briefing deadline is DENIED AS MOOT

.

It is so ORDERED on March 19, 2020.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

_________________________ Michael A . Cruz

Clerk of Cour
No. 09-8451.

#### Calvin Wilson, Petitioner v. Florida.

559 U.S. 981, 130 S. Ct. 1710,

176 L. Ed. 2d 196,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2139,

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 18 So. 3d 530.
# C_2018346EN.01024601.xml

| 27.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/246 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/246

---

P8_TA(2017)0384

Enhanced cooperation: European Public Prosecutor's Office ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 5 October 2017 on the draft Council regulation implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (‘the EPPO’) (09941/2017 — C8-0229/2017 — 2013/0255(APP))

(Special legislative procedure — consent)

(2018/C 346/40)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council regulation (09941/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council regulation (09941/2017),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 86 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0229/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 86 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0229/2017),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0290/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0290/2017),

| 1. | Gives its consent to the draft Council regulation; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
Exhibit 32.1NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.CERTIFICATION     In connection with the annual report of Novellus Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”), I, Richard S. Hill, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the datesand for the periods indicated.     This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities andExchange Commission.            Date: March 15, 2006 By:  /s/ Richard S. Hill    Richard S. Hill    Chairman of the Board of Directors and
No. 09-8614.

#### Willie Andrew Hampton, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 960, 130 S. Ct. 1563,

176 L. Ed. 2d 148,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1464.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 351 Fed. Appx. 723.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER AMENDING RULES 102, 105, 

120, 121, 301, 313, 341, 502, 553, 701, 

702, 901, 1311, 1312, 1316, 1323, 1501, 

1502, 1503, 1504, 1511, 1512, 1513, 

1514, 1515, 1516, 1517, 1531, 1532, 

1541, 1542, 1543, 1551, 1561, 1571, 

1573, 1701, 1702, 1704, 1762, 1770, 

1781, 1911, 2702, 3307, 3331 AND 

ADOPTING RULES 1601, 1602, 1603, 

1604, 1605, 1606, 1610, 1611, 1612,

1613 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES 

OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 287

APPELLATE PROCEDURAL RULES

DOCKET 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7

th day of January, 2020, upon the recommendation of the 

Appellate Court Procedural Rules Committee; the proposal having been published for 

public comment at 46 Pa.B. 2518 (May 21, 2016):

It is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania 

that Rules 102, 105, 120, 121, 301, 313, 341, 502, 553, 701, 702, 901, 1311, 1312, 

1316, 1323, 1501, 1502, 1503, 1504, 1511, 1512, 1513, 1514, 1515, 1516, 1517, 1531, 

1532, 1541, 1542, 1543, 1551, 1561, 1571, 1573, 1701, 1702, 1704, 1762, 1770, 1781, 

1911, 2702, 3307, 3331 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure are 

amended and Rules 1601, 1602, 1603, 1604, 1605, 1606, 1610, 1611, 1612, and 1613 

of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure are adopted in the attached form.

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall 

be effective August 1, 2020.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.
J

~~ j EV sr qT ~

s UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY $ 

# ~ e WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

0

PROS

~ G

~ ~ 

### N ov - 1 2010

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION Mr. William B. Mackie Acting Manager, National TRU Program Carlsbad Field Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, NM 88221-3090

Dear Mr. Mackie:

On February 8, 2010, the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) requested, as a Tier 1(Tl) change, that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approve four (4) remote-handlcd (RH) transuranic (TRU) solid waste containers of Test Reactor Area (TRA) Sludge from Idaho National Laboratory (INL). EPA has reviewed the information provided and approves the addition of these containers from waste stream ID-RTC-S3000 and, as a result, INL may dispose of this waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). This approval also allows future addition of waste to this stream with a waste pedigree (radiological and physical contents) similar to the waste approved in this letter. Any other additional S3000 waste must be approved by EPA using the Tier 1 process. The enclosed report (EPA Docket No. A-98-49; II-A4-137) supports EPA's approval decision based on the information reviewed. If you have any questions regarding this approval, please contact Rajani Joglekar at (202) 343-9462 or Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343-9422.

Sincerely,


### C74,, P 

# ~ Tom Peake, Director Center for Waste Management and Regulations

Enclosure

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov

Recycled/Recyclable 9 Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Papercc: Electronic Distribution

Christine Gelles, DOE EM Alton Harris, DOE EM Ed Ziemianski, CBFO Ava Holland, CBFO QA J R Stroble, CBFO Courtland Fesmire, CBFO Martin Navarrete, CBFO QA Dennis Miehls, CBFO QA D K Ploetz, WTS-CCP Mike Sensibaugh, WTS-CCP Mark Pearcy, WTS-CCP Allison Pangle, CTAC Porf Martinez, CTAC Steve Zappe, NMED
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 42 (Thursday, March 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4705]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13347-000]

Wells Rural Electric Company; Notice of Application for 
Preliminary Permit Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions 
To Intervene, and Protests

February 25, 2009.
    On December 18, 2008, Wells Rural Electric Company filed an 
application, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 
to study the proposed Bishop Creek Dam Water Power Project. The 
proposed project would be located on Bishop Creek or Bishop Creek 
Reservoir in Elko, Nevada. The existing Bishop Dam is federally owned 
and/or operated by the Bureau of Land Management.
    The proposed project would consist of: (1) A new dam of 79-foot 
high and crest of 408.7-foot long; (2) a reservoir holding 17,167-acre-
foot of water at normal pool elevation at 5,923 feet; (3) a new 4 mile-
long, 25-kilovolt transmission line; (4) a powerhouse containing one 
generating unit with one megawatts (MW) capacity; and (5) appurtenant 
facilities. The proposed project would have the potential for annual 
generation of 8.766 gigawatt-hours (GWh).
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Dan Dyer or Andrew Hammond, Dyer Engineering 
Consultants Inc., 5442 Longley Lane, Suite A, Reno, NV 89511, (775) 
852-1440.
    FERC Contact: Jake Tung, (202) 502-8757.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or 
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-
13347) in the docket number field to access the document. For 
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-4705 Filed 3-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
No. 11-331.

#### Douglas Paul Marcello, Petitioner v. Internal Revenue Service.

565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1079,

181 L. Ed. 2d 797,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 529.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

*798Former decision, 565 U.S. 979, 132 S. Ct. 523, 181 L. Ed. 2d 351, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7805.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 05759**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 05759\05759_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 05759\05759_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 05759\05759_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 05759\05759_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05759\05759_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05759\05759_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05759\05759_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05759\05759_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 05759\Certification Statement Plant ID 05759.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 05759\Supplemental Documents\05759_MG_A5-2 Maps.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 05759\Supplemental Documents\MG_A5-3_Water Balance_WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 05759\05759_Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

************************ 

 MONOGRAPH NO. BF2 

 ************************ 

ITEM: Fruit Cocktail w/ Light Syrup, Canned, Grade A or B 

 

NSN: 8915-00-286-5482; ITEM SPECIFICATION: US STD for Grades 

COMPONENT CLASSIFICATION: Secondary 

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 93 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM: 

APPEARANCE: Fairly bright colors; peaches are bright orange-yellow; pears are 

typical fruit white; cherries are pinkish red. 

ODOR: Slightly sweet, fruity. 

FLAVOR: Slightly sweet, fruity, pear. 

TEXTURE: Firm to slightly firm. 

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT 70 DEGREES F: 36(24) months 

 80 DEGREES F: 30(20) months 

 90 DEGREES F: 24(16) months 

 100 DEGREES F: 18(12) months 

NOTE: Numbers in parentheses are data for #10 cans. 

EXPECTED DETERIORATIVE CHANGES: 

APPEARANCE: Darker to deep yellow peach; pears pinkish brown to brown; cherries 

washed out pink. 

ODOR: Slightly sour. 

FLAVOR: Slightly sour to sour. 

TEXTURE: Soft, mushy. 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None. 
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

SPECIAL NOTES: Product is packed in #2-1/2 cans. Can is designed 

to yield 6 portions of approximately 1/2 cup each (128 grams).
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 9:58 AM

To: 'derricknevot@yahoo.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Request for Additional Informatio n: Aerial Experts, LLC (FAA-2015-2318)



### October 2, 2015

Dear Mr. Nevot:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-2318). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make(s), m odel(s), and type(s)(i.e. - fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) sh ould include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by October 16, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division
No. 09-8053.

#### Mark Bowersock, Petitioner v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al.

559 U.S. 949, 130 S. Ct. 1530,

176 L. Ed. 2d 129,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1261.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.