alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 39 (Monday, March 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4342]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended 
Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Reviews

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

Background

    Every five years, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended (``the Act''), the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') and the International Trade Commission automatically 
initiate and conduct a review to determine whether revocation of a 
countervailing or antidumping duty order or termination of an 
investigation suspended under section 704 or 734 of the Act would be 
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or a 
countervailable subsidy (as the case may be) and of material injury.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dana Mermelstein, AD/CVD Operations, 
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Ave., NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-1391.

Upcoming Sunset Reviews for April 2009

    There are no Sunset Reviews scheduled for initiation in April 2009.
    For information on the Department's procedures for the conduct of 
sunset reviews, See 19 CFR 351.218. This notice is not required by 
statute but is published as a service to the international trading 
community. Guidance on methodological or analytical issues relevant to 
the Department's conduct of Sunset Reviews is set forth in the 
Department's Policy Bulletin 98.3, Policies Regarding the Conduct of 
Five-year (``Sunset'') Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Orders; Policy Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 (April 16, 1998). The Notice of 
Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Reviews provides further 
information regarding what is required of all parties to participate in 
Sunset Reviews.

    Dated: February 23, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. E9-4342 Filed 2-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4768 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2006 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 777 Corporation Street in Beaver, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Robert Linn Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

HR 4768 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. ROBERT LINN MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILD2 ING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 777 Corporation Street in Bea5 ver, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Robert Linn Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert Linn Memorial 

11 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 20, 

2006. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
# C_2016115EN.01002001.xml

| 1.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/20

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2016/C 115/07)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 26.2.2016 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 26.2.2016 – 31.12.2016 |
| Member State | France |
| Stock or Group of stocks | SBR/678- |
| Species | Red seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo) |
| Zone | Union and international waters of VI, VII and VIII |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 02/DSS |

Date and time of closure

26.2.2016

Duration

26.2.2016 – 31.12.2016

Member State

France

Stock or Group of stocks

SBR/678-

Species

Red seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo)

Pagellus bogaraveo

Zone

Union and international waters of VI, VII and VIII

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

02/DSS

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4407]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,164]


Bradington-Young, LLC, Cherryville, NC; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 9, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of 
Bradington-Young, LLC, Cherryville, North Carolina.
    The workers at the subject facility are covered by an earlier 
petition (TA-W-65,147) filed on February 5, 2009 that is the subject of 
an ongoing investigation for which a determination has not been issued. 
Further investigation in this case would duplicate efforts and serve no 
purpose; therefore the investigation under this petition has been 
terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of February 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-4407 Filed 3-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4671 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4671

 To amend the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 to require reporting of 
         the congressional offices to which gifts are provided.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2006

  Mr. Garrett of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 to require reporting of 
         the congressional offices to which gifts are provided.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clarity in Lobbying Act''.

SEC. 2. REPORTING BY LOBBYISTS OF GIFTS TO CONGRESSIONAL OFFICES.

    Section 5(b) of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 
1604(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ``and'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) in paragraph (4), by striking the period and inserting 
        ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) the recipient and amount of any gift given by a 
        registrant or employee listed as a lobbyist to a covered 
        legislative branch official.
For purposes of paragraph (5), the term `gift' means a gratuity, favor, 
discount, entertainment, hospitality, loan, forbearance, or other item 
having monetary value. The term includes gifts of services, training, 
transportation, lodging, and meals, whether provided in kind, by 
purchase of a ticket, payment in advance, or reimbursement after the 
expense has been incurred.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-6788.

#### In re Judith A. Decker-Wegener, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 1092, 132 S. Ct. 849,

181 L. Ed. 2d 564,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8992,

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
ex10-1.htm


Ex. 10.1







BioLargo, Inc.


Engagement Extension Agreement


April 9, 2012







This Engagement Extension Agreement (the “Extension”) references the Engagement Agreement and Scope Letter dated February 1, 2008 (“2008 Agreement”) by and between CFO 911 (the “Advisor”) and BioLargo, Inc. (the “Company”), and the written extensions to that agreement (the “Prior Extensions”), pursuant to which Charles K. Dargan II is serving as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. The parties desire to extend the terms of the prior agreements for a period of one year, pursuant to the terms of this Extension. The 2008 Agreement, the Prior Extensions, and this Extension are collectively referred to herein as the “Agreement”.







Except as expressly amended or modified herein, all terms and conditions set forth in the 2008 Agreement and Prior Extension are incorporated herein by this reference, and continue to be in full force and effect. Effective February 1, 2012, the Advisor and the Company hereby agree to extend the Term of the engagement as set forth in the 2008 Agreement for one year (the “Extended Term”), to expire January 31, 2013. Notwithstanding the foregoing, either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days’ written notice.







All terms regarding compensation to the Advisor are amended and replaced by the following. During the Extended Term, the Advisor shall receive the compensation as set forth in this Extension. The Company shall issue to Charles K. Dargan II an option (the “Option”) to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, pursuant to the Company’s 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. The Option shall vest over a period of 12 months, with 25,000 shares vesting upon execution of this Extension, and an additional 25,000 shares vesting each month thereafter, so long as this Agreement is in full force and effect, and with any such remaining unvested portion to vest on January 31, 2013. The Option shall be exercisable at $0.35 per share, and shall expire April 9, 2012.


 


 


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED THIS 9th DAY OF APRIL, 2012




	
CFO 911


8055 W. Manchester Ave., Suite 405


Playa del Rey, CA  90232

	 	 	
BioLargo, Inc.


16150 Heron Avenue


La Mirada, CA  90638

	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	
/S/ CHARLES K. DARGAN II 

	 	 	By: 	
/S/ DENNIS P. CALVERT

	 
	
Name: Mr. Charles K. Dargan II 

	 	 	
Name: Mr. Dennis P. Calvert

	 
	
Title:   Chief Executive Officer

	 	 	
Title:   President

	 
	Date Signed:  April 9, 2012	 	 	Date Signed:  April 9, 2012
No. 11-6399.

#### Ronald A. Glick, Petitioner v. Dave Edwards, et al.

565 U.S. 1017, 132 S. Ct. 556,

181 L. Ed. 2d 402,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7972.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7150** 

EUGENE JEROME CUNNINGHAM , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.
DARLENE DREW, Warden

– FCI Bennettsville , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Beaufort

. Cameron McGowan Currie , District Judge. ( 9:11

- cv
- 03179

- CMC )

Submitted : January 22, 2014 Decided: January 29, 2014

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Eugene Jerome Cunningham, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Eugene Jerome Cunningham appeals from the district
court’s order denying his motion to void its earlier judgment
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. See Wendt v. Leonard , 431 F.3d 410,

412

- 13 (4th Cir. 2005 ) (providing standard in Rule 60(b)(4)
action). Accordingly, we affirm the challenged order . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 11-6723.

#### Earl Bennett Sorrells, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 1083, 132 S. Ct. 823,

181 L. Ed. 2d 533,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8737.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 09-531.

#### Haskell County Board of Commissioners, et al., Petitioners v. James W. Green, et al.

559 U.S. 970, 130 S. Ct. 1687,

176 L. Ed. 2d 180,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2057.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 568 F.3d 784.
WebFilings | EDGAR view


 


Exhibit 10(c)
 
Magellan GP, LLC
Non-Management Director
Compensation Program
 
Effective January 27, 2011
 
 
 
 
			
	 
	Compensation
	Timing of Payment(1)

	Annual Board Retainer:(2)
    Cash
 
 
    Common Units
	 
$50,000
 
 
$70,000(3)
	 
Paid quarterly as of January 1st , April 1st , July 1st and October 1st 
 
As of January 1st 

	Annual Chairman Retainer:(2) 
    Audit Committee
    Compensation Committee
    Conflicts Committee
    Presiding Director
	 
$15,000
$10,000
$10,000
$5,000
	 
Paid quarterly as of January 1st , April 1st , July 1st and October 1st 

	Meeting Fees: 
    Board Meeting Fees
    Committee Meeting Fees
	 
$1,500 per meeting
$1,500 per meeting
	 
Paid quarterly as of January 1st, April 1st, July 1st and October 1st 




 
		
	(1)    
	For newly elected directors or a newly appointed committee chairman, the annual board retainer and annual chairman retainer, if applicable, are payable pro-rata for the year of election.  


 
		
	(2)    
	Directors who resign from the board or relinquish their role of committee chairman after a payment date has occurred, but prior to the payment having been received, will receive a pro-rata annual board retainer and annual chairman retainer for the period of time between the payment date and the resignation/relinquishment. 


 
		
	(3)    
	The number of common units to be issued for the annual board retainer will be determined based on the closing price on the first business day immediately following the January 1st payment date.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 7, 2013

NO. 03-10-00515-CR

Charles Brown, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 427TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, ROSE AND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being 

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s 

judgment: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court that the judgment 

of the trial court is in all things affirmed; and it appearing that the appellant is indigent and 

unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be certified 

below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         284,896
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,697,089
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,027,528
<PP&E>                                      16,214,652
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             121,059,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,177,000
<BONDS>                                    111,199,589
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 40,246,750
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                 (47,450,400)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               121,059,450
<SALES>                                      6,347,282
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,347,282
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,455,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (19,211,244)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (19,211,244)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (19,211,244)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (211,470)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (211,470)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sturgis Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric L.
Eishen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

Date November 12, 2003                   /s/ Eric L. Eishen
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Eric L. Eishen, Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS***
I, Kenneth J. Cichocki, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Home Interiors &Gifts, Inc. (the “Registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the Registrant andhave:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on suchevaluation; c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theRegistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to affect, the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: November 15, 2004     /s/ KENNETH J. CICHOCKI  Kenneth J. Cichocki Chief Financial Officer
#### HUDSON FOAM PLASTICS CORPORATION, Appellant, v. David L. LADD, Commissioner of Patents, Appellee.

No. 18074.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Jan. 13, 1964.

Decided Feb. 13, 1964.

*892Mr. Bertram Ottinger, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Morris Kirschstein, New York City, and Martin T. Fisher, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Arnold B. Christen, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for appellant.

Mr. J. E. Armore, Atty., United States Patent Office, with whom Mr. Clarence W. Moore, Solicitor, United States Patent Office, was on the brief, for appellee.

Before Wilbur K. Miller, Washington and Danaher, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This suit was brought under 35 U.S.C. § 145, seeking authorization of the issuance of a patent on Claim 28 of plaintiff-appellant’s application, Serial No. 441,-984, entitled “Foamed Polyester Resin Laminated Products.” Claim 28, as summarized in plaintiff-appellant’s brief, covers a process “whereby such articles as soft, resilient seat cushions, arm rests and the like, comprising a resilient foam body and a flexible outer skin cover to which the body is directly bonded without an intermediate adhesive, can be produced entirely within a mold.” After a trial de novo, the District Court decided in favor of the defendant-appellee Commissioner of Patents, relying chiefly on the disclosures contained in Patent No. 2,639,252, issued to Simon and others on May 19, 1953. The court concluded:

> “For the reason that the evidence shows that the process set out in claim 28 is old, and the only difference is that it recites analogous materials which are clearly shown to have been known to the art when the application was filed, it is clear that the use of such materials in the method of Simon et al. would be obvious to one skilled in the art.”

We find no error affecting substantial rights. Compare Zenith Radio Corp. v. Ladd, 114 U.S.App.D.C. 54, 310 F.2d 859 (1962). The judgment of the District. Court, dismissing the complaint, will accordingly be

Affirmed.