alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (1)   | the                  Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Delta Oil & Gas, Inc. for                  the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements                  of                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                  information contained in the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A                  for                  the quarter ended March 31, 2006, fairly presents in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  Delta Oil                  & Gas, Inc.. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: | /s/                  Douglas Bolen                                                                           |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Douglas                  Bolen                                                                         |
|  Title:    |  Principal                  Executive Officer,Principal                  Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  January                  8, 2007                                                                       |
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4862 

To amend the Internet Tax Freedom Act to make permanent the moratorium 

on certain taxes relating to the Internet and to electronic commerce. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2006 

Mr. CAMPBELL of California (for himself, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BOUSTANY, 

Mr. CALVERT, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. DREIER, 

Ms. ESHOO, Mr. FOSSELLA, Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey, Ms. HARRIS, 

Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. HERGER, Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota, Mr. KIRK, 

Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, Mr. MACK, Mr. MCCAUL of Texas, Mr. 

MCHENRY, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. MILLER of Florida, 

Mrs. MUSGRAVE, Mr. OTTER, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. SIMMONS, Mr. 

UPTON, Mr. WELDON of Florida, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. WILSON of 

South Carolina, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. AKIN, Mr. FEENEY, 

Mr. KLINE, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina, Mr. GRAVES, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. KUHL of New York, Mr. 

GINGREY, Mr. PITTS, Ms. FOXX, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. PENCE, Mr. 

FORTUN ̃O, and Mr. MCHUGH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Internet Tax Freedom Act to make permanent 

the moratorium on certain taxes relating to the Internet 

and to electronic commerce. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4862 IH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Internet Consumer 

3 Protection Act of 2005’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNET TAX FREEDOM 

5 ACT. 

6 The Internet Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note) 

7 is amended— 

8 (1) in section 1101(a) by striking ‘‘during the 

9 period beginning November 1, 2003, and ending No10 vember 1, 2007’’, and 

11 (2) by striking section 1104. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
No. 09-8357.

#### Steven Leath, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 980, 130 S. Ct. 1707,

176 L. Ed. 2d 195,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2040,

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
No. 09-8527.

#### Michael H. Miller, Petitioner v. Florida.

559 U.S. 1011, 130 S. Ct. 1889,

176 L. Ed. 2d 372,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2577.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District, denied.

Same case below, 19 So. 3d 328.
No. 08-10404.

#### James R. Fultz, Petitioner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

559 U.S. 964, 130 S. Ct. 1571,

176 L. Ed. 2d 154,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1085.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 838, 130 S. Ct. 89, 175 L. Ed. 2d 61, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 5220.
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4962 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 19, 2006 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 100 Pitcher Street in Utica, New York, as 

the ‘‘Captain George A. Wood Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

HR 4962 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. CAPTAIN GEORGE A. WOOD POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 100 Pitcher Street in Utica, New 

5 York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Captain 

6 George A. Wood Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Captain George A. 

11 Wood Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 18, 2006. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
No. 09-8765.

#### Richard Marsden, Petitioner v. James McGrady, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Retreat, et al.

559 U.S. 1015, 130 S. Ct. 1904,

176 L. Ed. 2d 380,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2728.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
DAGOB ER T O NUNEZ-FLOR ES, AKA Da gobe rto R

ube n Nune z -Flore s, Pe titioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 12-72889 Age n c y No. A095-140-396 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 17, 2015 * * B e fore : O’ SC ANNLAIN, LEAVY, a n d FER N ANDEZ, C irc uit Judge s. Da gobe rto Nune z -Flore s, a native and c itiz e n of El Sa l va dor, pe titions pro se for re vie w of the B o a

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de c ision de ny ing his a pplic at ion for a sy lum , withholding of rem o v a l, a nd re lie f unde r the C onve ntion Against Torture(“ C AT” ).



# FIL ED FEB 25 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).W e hav e jurisdic tion under 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for substa ntia l e vide nc e the a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings, Silay a v . Muk ase y , 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th C ir. 2008), a nd we de ny

the pe tition for re vie w. The re c ord doe s not c om

pe l the c onc lusion tha

t Nune z -Flore s file d his a sy lum a pplic ation within a

re a sona ble pe riod of tim e a fte r his la wful sta tus e xpire d. Se eHusy e v

v . Muk ase y , 528 F.3d 1172, 1181-82 (9th C ir. 2008). Thus, Nune z -Flore s’ s a sy l um

c la im fa ils. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the B IA’ s de te rm ination tha

t Nune z -Flore s fa ile d to e sta

blish pa st pe rse c ution or a fe ar of future pe rse c ution on a c c ount of a prote c te d ground. Se eParussimov a v . Muk a se y , 555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th C ir. 2009) (the REAL ID Ac t

“ re quire s tha

t a prote c te d ground repre s e nt ‘ o ne c e ntra l re a son’ for an a sy lum a p plic ant’ s pe rse c ution” ); se e also Ze tino v . Holde r , 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th C ir. 2010) (“ An a lie n ’ s de sire to be fre e from ha ra ssm e nt by

c rim ina ls
m otiva t e d by the ft or ra

ndom viole nc e by ga

ng m e m b e rs be ars no ne xus to a prote c te d ground.” ); Molina-Morale s v . IN S, 237 F.3d 1048, 1051-52 (9th C ir. 2001) (“ [P] ure ly

pe rsona l re tribution is, of c ourse , not pe rse c ution on a c c ount of a prote c te d ground.” ) (c ita

tion omitte d). Thus, Nune z -Flore s’ s withholding of re m ova l c la im

fa ils. Se eMolina-Morale s , 237 F.3d a

t 1052.

1 2
- 7 2 8 8 9 2Fina lly , substa ntia l e v ide nc e a lso supports the B IA’ s de nia l of Nune z Flore s ’ s C AT c la im

be c a use he ha s not shown it is m ore like ly tha n not hewill be torture d by

the gove rnm e nt of El Sa lva d or or with its c onse nt or a c quie sc e nc e . Se e Silay a , 524 F.3d a

t 1073. Thus, Nune z -Flore s’ s C A T c la im fa ils. PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 2
- 7 2 8 8 9 3
RW05-23RW18-36DISPLACERW5THRESHOLD600'.MAINTAINLIGHTSPACING.MAXIMIZERWLENGTH.IIIIPERMANENTLYCLOSERUNWAY.010U.J_Juo:51:1:If)IVCili!=TORA-TQ[)l>.-7791:/II000'IMOI./11LOA=6190'1'r_1______ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___,f"-11000'.ASDA=LDA=6791:/:TORA=TODA=7790'RUNWAY05-23DECLAREDDISTANCESNOTE:APPROACHRSALENGTHOF0'ATRW23ENDANDRSAWIDTHOF400'WILLBENON-STANDARD.STATEOFALASKADEPARTMENTOFTRANSPORTATIONANDPUBLICF'ACILITIESCENTRALREGIONADAKAIRPORT/AD!¥..JIUg(ARUifi/AYSAFETYAREAIt.PROVEMENTSPROJECTNo.54972FIGL.RE#1RSA,·-·-·-·ODt'Ct'PDt"f"'AI14
Montana Twenty First Judicial District Court. County of Ravalli.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- DAVID GEORGE DAHL, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. 13-143

DECISION

On January 20, 2016, the Defendant’s suspended sentence was revoked for violation of the conditions of his probation and he was sentenced to be committed to a prison operated by the Montana Department of Corrections, for a period of five (5) years, for the offense of Charge I - Partner or Family Member Assault, third or subsequent offense, a felony. Furthermore, the Court ordered that the Defendant not be eligible for parole for a term of five (5) years pursuant to the parties’ recommendations.

The Court granted credit for time served for 141 days served in Cause No. DC-15-193 and credit for 192 days served in Cause No. DC-13-143, to be viewed concurrently.

On November 17, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Peter Ohman of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Defense Counsel submitted the sentencing hearing transcript and two letters dated May 2, 2016 and October 13, 2016 from Dr. Wayne Yakes of the Vascular Malformation Center.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is *101presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

Done in open Court this 17th day of November, 2016.

DATED this 8th day of December, 2016.

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member.
SKINNY
NUTRITIONAL CORP.


Offer
Letter


 


Start Date: November 1, 2011


 


Title: Chief Sales Officer


 


Term: 3 year term with mutually agreed upon renewals


 


Initial Stock Deal: 7,500,000 shares vested over a three year
period


 


Salary: $150,000 per year


 


Annual Bonus: Three tier bonus based on performance.


Performance standards to be determined within 30 days of start
date. Bonus levels are 20%, 40, and 50%. Bonus’ to be set by CEO.


 


Vacation: 4 weeks per calendar year.


 


Health/Dental Insurance: Full family coverage.


 


Car Allowance: $1,000 per month


 


Expenses: All business related expenses


 


Severance Period: 6 months for non cause termination,
after 1 year of employment


 


	Skinny Nutritional Corp.,	 	Robert W. Miller
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

In connection withthe Annual Report of American Power Conversion Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard J. Thompson,Senior Vice President, Finance, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

| /s/ RICHARD  J. THOMPSON                                       |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard J. Thompson                                            |
| *Senior Vice President, Finance, and Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

March 15, 2006

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and isnot being filed as part of a separate disclosure document.

----
II 

Calendar No. 569 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4646 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 6, 2006 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AUGUST 1, 2006 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 7320 Reseda Boulevard in Reseda, California, 

as the ‘‘Coach John Wooden Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JOHN WOODEN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 7320 Reseda Boulevard in 

6 Reseda, California, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Coach John Wooden Post Office Building’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4646 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Coach John Wooden 

5 Post Office Building’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS

bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Calendar No. 569 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4646 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. Reseda, California, as the ‘‘Coach John Wooden al Service located at 7320 Reseda Boulevard in 

AUGUST 1, 2006 

Reported without amendment 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Volunteer Income Tax Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, April 14, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Volunteer Income Tax Issue Committee will be held Tuesday, April 14, 2009, at 2 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Marisa Knispel. For more information please contact Ms. Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS Issues.

Dated: February 26, 2009.

Shawn F. Collins, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

 [FR Doc. E9-4659 Filed 3-4-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
exhb10.htm









Exhibit 10.2




     


 


 


 


February 25, 2011


 


Via Hand Delivery


530 Regency Drive Associates, L.P.


c/o The Hankin Group


707 Eagleview Boulevard


Exton, PA  19341







Attention:  Robert S. Hankin, President


 



Re:           Notice of Exercise of Option to Purchase under Lease Agreement dated December 17, 2010 (the “Lease”) between 530 Regency Drive Associates, L.P. (“Landlord”) and West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (“Tenant”)




Dear Mr. Hankin:




 


Pursuant to Section 43(a) of the Lease, Tenant hereby exercises its Option to Purchase the Leased Property pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Lease.  This letter shall serve as Tenant’s Option Notice, as such term is defined under the Lease.


 


Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.


 


 


Very truly yours,   


 


 












Enclosure


 


cc:    Edward J. Hollin, Esquire


                 Bart I. Mellis, Esquire
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 22

- 00346

- CR
Quentin Dewayne DILWORTH
, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court
, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021CR5590 Honorable Ron Rangel , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM
Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 10, 2 022

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION
On February 22, 2021, Appellant Dilworth was charged with possession of a firearm while

on community supervision. In January 2022, Appellant pled guilty to the unlawful possession of

a firearm. The trial court ent ered judgment on January 11, 2022, and certified that Appellant had

no right of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). On June 3, 2022, Appellant filed a notice of

appeal. Contra T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.2(a)(1).04

- 22

- 00346

- CR

- 2

- On July 7 , 202 2 , we ordered A ppellant to s how cause in writing why this appeal should
not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. On July 8, 2022, Appellant conceded that this appeal

suffers from jurisdictional defects.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
---

|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER     
|---------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,          
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert D. McDougal, the Chief Financial Officer of Ireland
Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                       

| | By:    | /s/ Robert D. McDougal               
| | ------ | -------------------------------------
| |        |                                      
| | Name:  | ROBERT D. MCDOUGAL                   
| |        |                                      
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
| |        |                                      
| | Date:  | August 12, 2009                      
| |        |                                      

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
No. 11-308.

#### Richard E. Thomas, et al., Petitioners v. Edward Alcoser, et al.

565 U.S. 978, 132 S. Ct. 518,

181 L. Ed. 2d 350,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7890,

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, denied.