alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 77938]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31179]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Release Certain Properties From Federal 
Obligations

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA hereby provides notice of intent to release certain 
airport properties 2.71 acres at the Orlando Executive Airport, 
Orlando, FL from the conditions, reservations, and restrictions as 
contained in a Quitclaim Deed agreement between the FAA and the City of 
Orlando, dated September 30, 1955. The release of property will allow 
the Greater Orlando Aviation Authority to dispose of the property for 
other than aeronautical purposes. The property is located adjacent to 
Crystal Lake Drive in Orange County, Florida. The parcel is currently 
designated as non-aeronautical use. The property will be released of 
its federal obligations to swap the land for another City-owned parcel. 
The 1.71 acre parcels to be acquired is also located adjacent to 
Crystal Lake Drive in Orange County, Florida. This parcel is adjacent 
to airport property. The fair market value of the airport-obligated 
parcels has been determined by appraisal to be 1,843,400. The fair 
market value of the non-obligated parcels has been determined by 
appraisal to be 2,155,110.
    Documents reflecting the Sponsor's request are available, by 
appointment only, for inspection at the offices of the Greater Orlando 
Aviation Authority at Orlando International Airport, and the FAA 
Airports District Office.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 125 of The Wendell H. Ford Aviation 
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR-21) requires the 
FAA to provide an opportunity for public notice and comment prior to 
the ``waiver'' or ``modification'' of a sponsor's Federal obligation to 
use certain airport land for non-aeronautical purposes.

DATES: Comments are due on or before January 13, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for review at the the offices of the 
Greater Orlando Aviation Authority at Orlando International Airport, 
and the FAA Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National Drive, 
Suite 400, Orlando, FL 32822. Written comments on the Sponsor's request 
must be delivered or mailed to: Rebecca R. Henry, Program Manager, 
Orlando Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 
400, Orlando, FL 32822-5024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca R. Henry, Program Manager, 
Orlando Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 
400, Orlando, FL 32822-5024.

    Issued in Orlando, Florida on December 2, 2010.
W. Dean Stringer,
Manager, Orlando Airports District Office, Southern Region. Revision 
Date 11/22/00
[FR Doc. 2010-31179 Filed 12-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3546 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3546

To prevent Federal agencies from interfering with the marijuana policy 
                               of States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 27, 2019

Mr. Blumenauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prevent Federal agencies from interfering with the marijuana policy 
                               of States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State Cannabis Commerce Act''.

SEC. 2. STATES MARIJUANA POLICY.

    (a) Definitions.--In this Act:
            (1) Federal agency.--The term ``Federal agency'' has the 
        meaning given the term ``agency'' in section 551 of title 5, 
        United States Code.
            (2) Marijuana.--The term ``marijuana'' has the meaning 
        given the term ``marihuana'' in section 102 of the Controlled 
        Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802).
            (3) State.--The term ``State'' means any State, the 
        District of Columbia, any territory or possession of the United 
        States, or any Indian tribal government.
    (b) Prohibitions.--No funds authorized or appropriated by Federal 
law, and none of the funds in any trust fund to which funds are 
authorized or appropriated by Federal law, shall be expended to prevent 
any State from implementing any law of the State that--
            (1) authorizes the use, distribution, possession, or 
        cultivation of marijuana on non-Federal land in the State; or
            (2) authorizes the transportation of marijuana across the 
        border of the State if--
                    (A) the State from which the marijuana is 
                transported has a State law described in paragraph (1); 
                and
                    (B) the State and the State from which the 
                marijuana is transported have both authorized such 
                transportation of marijuana between the States.
                                 <all>
```
No. 09-869.

#### Don Benny Anderson, Petitioner v. Federal Bureau of Investigation.

559 U.S. 973, 130 S. Ct. 1716,

176 L. Ed. 2d 184,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2160.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________
NO

. 09

- 1 5

- 00 090

- C V



### ____________________

LARRY D. PREWITT AND DEBORAH D. PREWITT , Appellant s

V.

JACKIE NEIL NORSWORTHY , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 1A Di strict Court Jasper County, Texas Trial Cause No

. 33060

________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER

In their brief on appeal, a ppellants Larry D. Prewitt and Deborah D. Prewitt

urge that the trial court erred in failing to make findings of fact and conclusions of

law and they request an abatement of the appeal for entry of findings. See Tex. R.

App. P. 44.4(a). Appellee Jackie Neil Norsworthy sugges ts the error did not

prevent a ppellants from properly presenting their case to the Court of Appeals

because a ppellants challenge each of a ppellee’s multiple theories of recovery in

their brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.1(a)(2). After reviewing the parties ’ b riefs and2 the appellate record, we conclude that findings of fact and conclusions of law are

necessary for the proper presentation of the appeal and the trial court can correct its

failure to act by making written findings of fact and conclusions of law th at will

assist this Court’s decision in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.4(b).

We abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court for entry of

findings of fact and conclusions of law. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 297. The trial court

shall allow the parties ten days after the trial court signs its findings of fact and

conclusions of law to request additional findings and conclusions. See Tex. R. Civ.

P. 298. The appeal is abated and all appellate timetables are suspende d while the

case is before the trial court. A supplemental record, including any findings of fact

made by the trial court and the trial court’s conclusions of law, any additional

findings and conclusions requested by the parties, and any additional or amen ded

findings and conclusions made by the trial court, shall be filed with the Court of

Appeals by September 14 , 2015 . The appeal will be reinstated without further

order of this Court when the supplemental clerk’s record is filed. After

reinstatement of the a ppeal, the parties may file supplemental briefs addressing the

trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. The supplemental brief of the

appellant s shall be due thirty days after the supplemental clerk’s record is filed3 with the Court of Appeals

. The supplemental brief of the appellee shall be due

thirty days after the appellants file their supplemental brief.

ORDER ENTERED August 13 , 2015

.

PER CURIAM

Befor e McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson , JJ.
No. 09-8317.

#### Charles F. Tucker, Petitioner v. Georgia.

559 U.S. 980, 130 S. Ct. 1706,

176 L. Ed. 2d 195,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2137,

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
No. 09-824.

#### Craig Smallwood, Petitioner v. Haseko (Ewa), Inc., et al.

559 U.S. 992, 130 S. Ct. 1746,

176 L. Ed. 2d 214,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2336.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii denied.
No. 09-8356.

#### Dartagnan Little, Petitioner v. Unknown McDonald, et al.

559 U.S. 994, 130 S. Ct. 1741,

176 L. Ed. 2d 216,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2323.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
##### 



THIRD AMENDMENT TO
ALION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP, SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN

WHEREAS, Alion Science and Technology Corporation (the Company)
maintains an Employee Ownership, Savings and Investment Plan for the benefit of
its Employees and the Employees of any other Adopting Employer, which Plan was
last restated as of December 19, 2001 (the Plan); and

WHEREAS, under Section 15.1 of the Plan, the Company reserved the right to
amend the Plan at any time, in whole or in part, by action of its Board of
Directors; and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company, pursuant to Section 15.1
of the Plan, has delegated authority to amend the Plan to the undersigned
officer, provided he determines that the amendment would not materially
increase costs of the Plan to the Company or any Adopting Employer; and

WHEREAS, the Plan has been amended twice to date; and

WHEREAS, the undersigned officer has determined that this Third Amendment
would not materially increase costs of the Plan to the Company or any Adopting
Employer;

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the powers of amendment reserved under Section
15.1 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended by the Company, effective April 1,
2003, unless otherwise provided, as follows:

ARTICLE IV

Section 4.3  As amended, further amended, by adding at the end thereof the
following new paragraph:

Regardless of the first five sentences of the first
paragraph of this Section 4.3, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
of the Company or an officer of the Company designated by the CEO
may set up divisions, operations, subsidiaries or similar cohesive
groups which have their own contribution rate for Profit Sharing
Contributions during part or all of any Plan Year. The
contribution rate for any unit for Profit Sharing Contributions
may be zero. A Participants total Profit Sharing Contribution for
the Plan Year will be the sum of the products of his Compensation
attributable to each unit multiplied by the units contribution
rate. Any Participant who becomes part of such unit during a Plan
Year shall be eligible to receive the Profit Sharing
Contributions, if any, that he had been eligible to receive before
joining such unit until his date of transfer and begin receiving
the Profit Sharing Contributions, if any, that are applicable to
such unit as of his date of transfer.





---



##### 



In General

Any provision of the amended and restated Plan
inconsistent with the foregoing changes is hereby
amended to be consistent herewith.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Alion Science and Technology Corporation has caused
this First Amendment to the Plan to be executed on its behalf by its duly
authorized officer on this 19th day of May, 2003.

ALION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Stacy MendlerTitle:
    Sr. Vice President(Seal)
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
FOR THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [Reserved]c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/
Bahman AtefiName: Bahman AtefiTitle: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 35.9



|     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                                                        
|---- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  |  |  | Corporate Trust Services 
MAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045 
Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380



|Re: | Annual Statement of Compliance for BXP Trust 2017-GM, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-GM
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 9, 2017 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period):

(a)    A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has
been made under such officers supervision; and

(b)    To the best of such officers knowledge, based on
such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted in Schedule A.

February 16, 2018





|              
|--------------
|LOGO          
|BRIAN SMITH   
|Vice President



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO



---

|     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                                                        
|---- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  |  |  | Corporate Trust Services 
MAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045 
Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380



Schedule A

Material Instances of Non-Compliance

List of Exemptions for BXP Trust 2017-GM, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-GM

The July 13, 2017 distribution (the July Distribution), due to holders of certificates of the BXP Trust 2017-GM, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-GM, was made eight days late on July 21, 2017 by Wells Fargo. The inadvertent delay in the required
distribution, consisting of approximately $4.45 million, was because of a human error in the verification of payment data from internal systems. The error resulted in a delay in the release of the payment information to the payment processing
system. The impact of this error was limited to the July Distribution.



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
# Griffin 1 Williams
August 5, 2014 Via FederalExpress Federal Aviation Administration Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk 600 Independence Avenue SW Wilbur Wright Building Suite 2W1000 Washington, DC 20591 Re: Request for Hearing 

# R Attomeysanrl Counselors atLavv

Richard L. Williams Direct; (630) 457-1205 rwilliams@gwllplaw.com 

# D
HEA DOCKET FAA Case No. 201380700205

# ~OIL.\-**O~ylp** Dear Hearing Docket Clerk: Please be advised that our firm represents D G W., Inc., d/b/a Melrose T Top. Reference is made your correspondence dated July 29, 2014 entitled "Final Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty" addressed to "President, Melrose T-Top, 100 W. Ellwalk, Cortland, IL 60112." In accordance with Section 13.16 ofthe Federal Aviation Regulations (14 C.F.R. §13.16), D G W, Inc. hereby requests a formal hearing inthis matter.



## \

....**~·** Enc. \! cc: Via CertifiedMail, ReturnReceiptRequested Christopher R. Stevenson, Esq. Office ofthe Regional General Counsel Federal Aviation Administration Southern Region P.O. Box 20636 Atlanta, Georgia 30320 GIW • 501 W. State Street, Suite 203 • Geneva • lllinois • 60134 • ph: 630.457.1205 •fax: 630.262.0644 www.gwllplaw.com

## GIW

GRANT OF AUTHORITY I, the undersigned, certify that I am the President ofD G W, Inc., an Illinois corporation, and hereby authorize my attorney, Richard L. Williams of Griffin!Williams LLP, 501 W. State Street, Suite 203, Geneva, Illinois 60134, to file the above referenced Request for Hearing. I do here further authorize and direct all further communications regarding FAA Case No. 2013S0700205 to be served upon Richard L. Williams.

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 

# .5il,day ofAugust, 2014

# ~ell/. Notary Public

# ~ By David Wiehle, President
No. 09-8369.

#### Keith Russell Judd, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 954, 130 S. Ct. 1547,

176 L. Ed. 2d 138,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1447,

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. §1350

In connection with the quarterly
report of Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Alan P. Niedzwiecki,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.



|                         |  |                                                          
|------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 11, 2006 |  |                                                          
|                         | 
|                         |  | /s/ ALAN P. NIEDZWIECKI                                  
|                         |  | Alan P. Niedzwiecki President and Chief Executive
Officer
August 8, 2016

Mr. Michael Mendez

Flight Operations Director

Area-I Incorporated

1590 North Roberts Road

Suite 102

Kennesaw, GA 30144

Re: FAA–2015–3039

Dear Mr. Mendez:

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and 

have determined that we will continue to process your petition. 

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov, we 

are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 107 (www.faa.gov/uas) will satisfy your request. We have determined that 

your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your 

petition for exemption. 

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will 

publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments, if we have 

not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst
No. 09-7558.

#### Larry Robinson, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1050, 130 S. Ct. 2341,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3088.

176 L. Ed. 2d 563,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 341 Fed. Appx. 546.
No. 11-7371.

#### Mat A. Matney, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1129, 132 S. Ct. 1044,

181 L. Ed. 2d 767,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 84.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 424 Fed. Appx. 596.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4912 

To amend section 242 of the National Housing Act to extend the exemption 

for critical access hospitals under the FHA program for mortgage insurance for hospitals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2006 

Mr. NEY (for himself, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Ms. WATERS, Mr. DAVIS

of Alabama, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, and Mr. RENZI) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend section 242 of the National Housing Act to extend 

the exemption for critical access hospitals under the 

FHA program for mortgage insurance for hospitals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Health Care 

5 Capital Access Act of 2006’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4912 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION. 

2 Paragraph (1) of section 242(i) of the National 

3 Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715z–7(i)(1)) is amended by 

4 striking ‘‘July 31, 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘July 31, 2011’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS