alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4551]



[[Page 9435]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,299]


United States Steel Great Lakes Works, Ecorse, MI; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 19, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed by the United Steelworkers of America, Local 1299 on 
behalf of workers of United States Steel Great Lakes Works, Ecorse, 
Michigan.
    The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition 
(TA-W-64,773) filed on December 19, 2008 that is the subject of an 
ongoing investigation for which a determination has not yet been 
issued. Further investigation in this case would duplicate efforts and 
serve no purpose; therefore the investigation under this petition has 
been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 24th day of February 2009.
 Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-4551 Filed 3-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 18 - 0116 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. THOMAS DEUTSCH, SR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 19 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 11 2020

08/11/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0116
UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

Before 

SIMS, COOK, and GALLAGHER 

Appellate Military Judges 

UNITED STATES, Appellee 

v. 

Private E1 KEVIN M. PEARCE 

United States Army, Appellant 

ARMY 20110107 

Headquarters, United States Army Accessions Command and Fort Knox 

Timothy Grammel, Military Judge 

Colonel Robert J. Cotell, Staff Judge Advocate 

For Appellant: Lieutenant Colonel Imogene M. Jamison, JA; Major Richard E. 

Gorini, JA; Captain Meghan M. Poirier, JA (on brief). 

For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Amber J. Roach, JA; Major LaJohnne A. White, 

JA; Captain Daniel H. Karna, JA (on brief). 

16 May 2012 

-------------------------------- 

SUMMARY DISPOSITON 

--------------------------------

Per Curiam: 

 A military judge sitting as a special court-martial convicted appellant, 

pursuant to his pleas, of three specifications of absence without leave, in violation of 

Article 86 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 886 (2008) 

[hereinafter UCMJ]. Appellant was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, 

confinement for eleven months, and forfeiture of $978.00 pay per month for eleven 

months. The convening authority (CA) approved eight months of confinement, 

sixty-two days of confinement credit, and the remainder of the adjudged sentence.

 

This case is before us court for review pursuant to Article 66, UCMJ. 

 



 We note that the CA inexplicably waived “automatic forfeiture of two-thirds pay 

and allowances” for the benefit of appellant’s spouse, yet approved the adjudged 

forfeiture of $978.00 pay per month for 11 months, thereby preventing any funds 

 (continued . . .) 
PEARCE – ARMY 20110107 

2

Appellant alleges, and the government concedes, that there is no evidence that 

a letter from appellant’s previous company commander, enclosure 8 to appellant’s 

Rule for Courts-Martial [hereinafter R.C.M.] 1105 matters, was submitted to the CA 

prior to his taking initial action in appellant’s case as is required by R.C.M. 

1107(b)(3)(A)(iii) and United States v. Wheelus, 49 M.J. 283, 287 (C.A.A.F. 1998). 

We agree, and will return this case for a new recommendation and action. 

 

CONCLUSION 

The convening authority’s action, dated 16 June 2011, is set aside. The 

record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General for a new staff judge 

advocate recommendation and initial action by the same or a different convening 

authority in accordance with Article 60(c)-(e), UCMJ. 

 FOR THE COURT: 

 MALCOLM H. SQUIRES, JR. 

 Clerk of Court 

 

 

(. . . continued) 

from being paid to appellant’s spouse. In light of our disposition of this case, 

however, we need not address this ambiguity. 

MALCOLM H. SQUIRES, JR. 

Clerk of Court 

FOR THE COURT:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4878 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4878

                    For the relief of Karen Poppell.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 2006

Mr. LaTourette introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    For the relief of Karen Poppell.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMMEDIATE RELATIVE STATUS FOR KAREN POPPELL.

    (a) In General.--Karen Poppell shall be classified as an immediate 
relative within the meaning of section 201(b)(2)(A)(i) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act for purposes of approval of a relative 
visa petition filed under section 204 of such Act by Karen Poppell and 
the filing of an application for an immigrant visa or for adjustment of 
status.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Karen Poppell enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), she 
shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the petition and the application for 
issuance of an immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of 
status are filed with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Karen Poppell, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, for the 
following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas available 
under section 201(c)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Karen Poppell 
shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 
privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2017440EN.01000202.xml

| 21.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 440/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 440/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8360 — Imerys/Kerneos)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 440/04)

On 19 June 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8360. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8360. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0205 SAT Date: 1/18/2013 Print Date: 4/1/2013

Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 2 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 2 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: IRR/CORROSION, LUNG, UNCERT-SENS-DERMAL/RESPIRATORY, AQUATOX-A,C
Summary of Assessment :

Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0200-09 FATE: Estimations for MW 441 Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) log Kow = 5.01 (E) S = Disp. / 1.38 mg /L at 25 C (ICB / E) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) log Koc = 5.86 (E)log Fish BCF = 1.85 (E) log Fish BAF = 1.82 (E) POTW removal (%) = 75-90 via sorption and biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo Sorption to soils/sediments = strong PBT Potential: P2B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor through the skin, moderate through the GI tract, and good through the lungs based on analogs. There is concern for irritation and p ossible corrosion based on the and concern for lung effects if respirable particles are inhaled based on cationic binding to lung tissues and the surfactant properties of the PMN material. There is also uncertain concern for dermal and respiratory sensitization based on smaller . Moderate concern.

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 1.2 daphnid 48-h LC50 0.20 green algal 96-h EC50 0.083 fish

_ chronic value 0.024 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.023

algal

_ chronic value 0.035
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for with molecular weight adjustment; SAR chemical class = ; MW 520; liquid; log Kow = 4.94 (EPI); S = dispersible in water at 25 C (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 2

SARs iincludes molecular weight adjustment SAR Class aliph Ecotox CategoryEcotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: Becky Jones
APP B

DSCPM 4155.2

*************************

MONOGRAPH NO.: 4A4

*************************

ITEM: Maple Syrup (MSY)

NSN: 8925-01-368-1611 ITEM SPECIFICATION: JJJ-S-351

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 84

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Thick, viscous liquid; medium to dark brown color.

ODOR: Sweet, maple.

FLAVOR: Maple, imitation fenugreek (herb).

TEXTURE: Smooth, thick, syrup.

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT 70 DEGREES F: 36 months

 80 DEGREES F: 27 months

 90 DEGREES F: 18 months

 100 DEGREES F: 9 months

EXPECTED DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

APPEARANCE: Darker color, crystallized.

ODOR: Sweet, maple.

FLAVOR: Maple, bitterness possible.

TEXTURE: Possibly thinner. 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None.

SPECIAL NOTES: Product is packaged in a 12 ounce plastic bottle.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

     Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of West Bancorporation, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas R. Gulling,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of West Bancorporation,
Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) The report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of
operations of West Bancorporation, Inc.

May 6, 2005

/s/ Douglas R. Gulling
----------------------------------------------------
Douglas R. Gulling
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 10.78
  
 Re: Addendum to Offer Letter
   1. Benefits .
  
    
    Tax Preparation Subsidy
    
    Physical Fitness Membership Subsidy
    
    Annual Health Physical Subsidy
  2. Severance .




---



##### 



3. Change of Control Benefits .
 4. Eligibility for Change of Control Benefits .




---



##### 








---



##### 



5. Change in Control .
 6. Other Provisions .
    /s/ Stacy MendlerStacy MendlerExecutive Vice President
  /s/ Scott Fry
    
    
    
    6/6/06Signature
    
    
    
    Date
# C_2017377EN.01000501.xml

| 9.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 377/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 377/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8643 — Legend Holdings Corporation/Banque Internationale à Luxembourg)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 377/04)

On 31 October 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8643. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8643. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 35.4



LOGO

Officers Certificate

Pursuant to the requirements of the applicable Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, for which Midland Loan Services, a
Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, and Berkeley Point Capital LLC, as Servicer, the undersigned, Ronald Steffenino, a Senior Managing Director of Berkeley Point Capital LLC, hereby certifies subject to any limitations
listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, solely in his capacity as an officer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar year (the Reporting Period) and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 1st day of March, 2018.

Berkeley Point Capital LLC



|                              
|------------------------------
|LOGO                          
|Ronald Steffenino             
|Senior Managing Director,     
|Servicing and Asset Management



---

LOGO

Schedule I

Multifamily Pass-Through Certificates, Berkeley Point Capital LLC as Sub-Servicer:

Series 2009-K4

Series 2010-K5

Series 2011-K10

Series
2011-K12

Series 2012-K709

Series 2013-K24

Series 2013-KF02

Series 2014-K503

Series
2014-KF06

Series 2015-KF07

Series 2015-KF08

Series
2015-KF10

Series 2015-KF12

Series 2016-KF13

Series
2016-KF16

Series 2016-KSW1

Series 2016-KF18

Series
2016-KF26

Series 2017-K71

Series 2017-K724

Series
2017-K725

Series 2017-K726

Series 2017-K727

Series
2017-K728

Series 2017-KF29

Series 2017-KF33

Series
2017-KF35

Series 2017-KF38

Series 2017-KSW2

Series
2017-KSW3



---

LOGO

Schedule I continued

Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates; Berkeley Point Capital LLC as Primary Servicer:

COMM 2014-CCRE17 Mortgage Trust

COMM 2014-CCRE19 Mortgage Trust

Series 2014-GC24

COMM 2014-UBS4
Mortgage Trust

2015-CCRE23

COMM 2015 CCRE27 Mortgage Trust

Series 2015-GC30

2015-GS1

GSCCRE Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-HULA

COMM 2015-LC19 Mortgage Trust

Series 2015-LC21

CFCRE 2016-C3
Mortgage Trust

CGCMT 2016-C3

CFCRE 2016-C7

CCRESG Commercial
Mortgage Trust 2016-HEAT

CCUBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2017-C1

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2017-C4

UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2017-C5
No. 09-970.

#### Richard Boyle, Petitioner v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security.

559 U.S. 1069, 130 S. Ct. 2103,

176 L. Ed. 2d 724,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3415.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Q500	4k	Owner	Maintenance	Procedures

All	maintenance	will	be	performed	in	accordance	with	the	manufacturers	

requirements,	safe-operating	practices	and	per	the	operator’s	maintenance	

procedures	as	described	herein.		The	Aircraft	log	sheet	will	be	closed and	a	new	log	

sheet	created	after	7	days	ending	at	2400	hours	on	Sunday	on	a	weekly	basis.

Pre-flight	inspection	per	the	operator’s	checklist	required	before	each	flight.		The	

operator	requires	an	inspection	signoff;	once	daily	on	the	day	that	the	aircraft	is	

intended	to	be	flown	prior	to	flight.

Discrepancies	and	deficiencies	will	be	noted	in	the	aircraft	logbook	to	include	an	

Item	number,	Date	and	time,	Discrepancy,	Persons	name	and	Certificate	number.

The	aircraft	will	not	be	flown	until	the	Discrepancy	is	corrected	and	signed	off	by	

the	operator	or	authorized	repair	person,	listing	the	Item	number,	Date	and	Time,	

the	corrective	action	taken	and	the	person’s	signature	performing	the	corrective	

action.

All	airframe,	ground	station	and	component	items	are	per	the	manufacturer,	oncondition	and	time	limits	will	be	set	as	the	needed.			

As	preventative	maintenance	the	operator	elects	to	time	limit	propeller	O-rings	to	a	

maximum	of	4	calendar	weeks	of	installation.		O-rings	will	be	removed	and	replaced	

at that	time	interval	or	upon	condition	with	an	equivalent	or	higher	quality	O-ring	

than	that	supplied	by	the	manufacturer.		All	four	O-rings	will	be	replaced	anytime	a	

replacement	is	performed.		An	appropriate	entry	will	be	made	noting	the	flight	time	

since last	change	and	the	installation	date	and	time.

Weekly,	beginning	at	the	start	of	a	new	week	the	propeller	shaft	threads	will	have	a	

small	amount	of	anti-seize	applied	to	the	propeller	hub	threads	to	prevent	galling	

and	propeller	seizure.	

Propellers	will	be	installed	by	turning	the	propeller	in	the	proper	direction	until	

contact	is	made	with	the	O-ring,	then	one	full	and	a	half	turn	will	be	made	to	

properly	seat	the	propellers	on	the	shaft.		This	is	per	the	manufacturers	

recommendation.	

This	maintenance	procedure	list	will	be	updated	and	amended	as	necessary.
No. 09-984.

#### Timothy J. Owen, Petitioner v. Stephen P. Sands.

559 U.S. 1069, 130 S. Ct. 2110,

176 L. Ed. 2d 725,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3394.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, denied.

Same case below, 176 Cal. App. 4th 985, 98 Cal. Rptr. 3d 167.
Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned,  Yu Chang, the Chief Executive Officer and Lijun Peng,
the  Chief  Financial  Officer  and  Treasurer  of  CHINA  AGRITECH,  INC.  (the
"Company"), DO HEREBY CERTIFY that:

         1. The  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2006 (the  "Report"),  fully complies with the  requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement
this 14th day of August 2006.


                                            /s/ Yu Chang
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Yu Chang
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)

                                            /s/ Lijun Peng
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Lijun Peng
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                           (Principal Financial Officer)


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to China Agritech,  Inc. and will be retained by China  Agritech,  Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.

The forgoing  certification  is being  furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission  pursuant to ss. 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350.  It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and
is not to be incorporated  by reference into any filing of the Company,  whether
made before or after the date hereof,  regardless  of any general  incorporation
language in such filing.
DENT 

Table IV, Defect No. 110 – Major defect. A very deep, sharp, 

angular dent with crimping of the body wall.