alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.10



|     |  |                                                                                                           |  | 
|---- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing D1050-084, 8th Fl 401 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |  | 



ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2017, by and among WELLS FARGO
COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as General Special Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer and as NCB
Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2017-BNK7 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify
that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the period from September 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during
such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of
February 2018.



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|LOGO                                                  
|Daniel Bober Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank









|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
No. 09-7932.

#### Uykheng Ngy, Petitioner v. You Song Seck.

559 U.S. 1033, 130 S. Ct. 1946,

176 L. Ed. 2d 410,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2375.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 911, 130 S. Ct. 1298, 175 L. Ed. 2d 1087, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 1000.
No. 11-6654.

#### Oxana Ivantchouk, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

565 U.S. 1067, 132 S. Ct. 777,

181 L. Ed. 2d 498,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8627.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 918.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Corey
Henry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-3 (the
Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based
on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in
all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and
their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I
have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wilmington Trust, National Association.



By:

/s/ Corey HenryName:

Corey HenryTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerSantander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as
Depositor(senior officer in charge of securitization ofthe depositor)Date:

March 29, 2019
Presidential Documents

40167

Federal Register

Vol. 63, No. 144

Tuesday, July 28, 1998

Title 3—

The President

Executive Order 13092 of July 24, 1998

President’s Information Technology Advisory Committee,

Amendments to Executive Order 13035

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the

laws of the United States of America, including the High-Performance Computing Act of 1991 (Public Law 102–194), and in order to add five more

members to, and to change the name of the Advisory Committee on HighPerformance Computing and Communications, Information Technology, and

the Next Generation Internet, it is hereby ordered that Executive Order

13035 of February 11, 1997, is amended as follows:

1. In section 1, the words ‘‘Advisory Committee on High Performance Computing and Communications, Information Technology, and the Next Generation Internet’’ are deleted and the words ‘‘President’s Information Technology

Advisory Committee’’ are inserted in lieu thereof at the end of the first

sentence of section 1; and

2. In section 1, the words ‘‘25 nonfederal members’’ are deleted and the

[FR Doc. 98–20315

words ‘‘30 nonfederal members’’ are inserted in lieu thereof.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

July 24, 1998.

œ–

Filed 7–27–98; 8:45 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3605 

To expand the private right of action under the Telephone Consumer 

Protection Act for calls in violation of the Do Not Call rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2019 

Ms. SCHAKOWSKY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To expand the private right of action under the Telephone 

Consumer Protection Act for calls in violation of the 

Do Not Call rules. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting American 

5 Consumers from Robocalls Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION FOR CALLS IN VIOLA7 TION OF DO NOT CALL RULES. 

8 Section 227(c)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934 

9 (47 U.S.C. 227(c)(5)) is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3605 IH

1 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), 

2 by striking ‘‘more than one telephone call within any 

3 12-month period by or on behalf of the same entity’’ 

4 and inserting ‘‘a telephone call by or on behalf of an 

5 entity’’; and 

6 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘up to’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
No. 09-9262.

#### Sammy Edward French, Jr., aka Samuel Edward French, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1025, 130 S. Ct. 1932,

176 L. Ed. 2d 398,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2371.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 177.
# C_2018058EN.01024701.xml

| 15.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/247 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/247

---

P8_TA(2016)0116

Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors — Jan Gregor

European Parliament decision of 13 April 2016 on the nomination of Jan Gregor as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C8-0412/2015 — 2015/0815(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2018/C 058/36)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0412/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0412/2015),

| — | having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0057/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0057/2016),

| A. | whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

| B. | whereas at its meeting of 15 March 2016 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

B.

whereas at its meeting of 15 March 2016 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors;

| 1. | Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Jan Gregor as a Member of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Jan Gregor as a Member of the Court of Auditors;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.

---
No. 11-7684.

#### James J. Parisi, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1137, 132 S. Ct. 1069,

181 L. Ed. 2d 783,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 452.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 658 F.3d 1.
# C_2017268EN.01000101.xml

| 12.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 268/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 268/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8443 — TPG/Oaktree/Iona Energy)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 268/01)

On 17 May 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document 32017M8443. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document 32017M8443. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I hereby certify that the Quarterly Report of Dover Petroleum
Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of Dover Petroleum Corp.


Date: August 19, 2002              /s/Robert Salna
                                   ----------------------------
                                   Robert Salna
                                   Chief Executive Officer




Date: August 19, 2002              /s/Allan Ibbitson
                                   ----------------------------
                                   Allan Ibbitson
                                   Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4822 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4822

 To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to permit development 
of necessary technology to reduce energy demand through more efficient 
                          torchiere lighting.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 2006

 Mr. Sessions introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to permit development 
of necessary technology to reduce energy demand through more efficient 
                          torchiere lighting.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Torchiere Lighting Efficiency 
Standards and Technology Development Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 325(x) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 
6295(x)) is amended by striking ``January 1, 2006'' and inserting 
``October 1, 2006''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 09-6915.

#### Dupre Falls, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 941, 130 S. Ct. 1503,

176 L. Ed. 2d 118,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1218.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 323 Fed. Appx. 836.
ACR-U-20 

4 September 2020 

TABLE IL Contents 

ST AND ARD BREAKFAST ITEMS 

Component Unit oflssue, Servings Quantity- Menu 

Coffee, Filter Pack 1.25 oz. filter pack, 5 per 

bag 

1 

Cocoa Beverage Powder 16 packets per box 1: Menu 2 

1: Menu 5 

Drink Mix, Cappuccino 1 oz. packet, 25 per bag 1: Irish Cream, Menu 1 

1: Fr. Vanilla, Menu 3 

Creamer 3 g. packet, 25 per bag 1 

Hot Sauce, Extra Hot 4x 3 oz. bottle 1 

Trays, Mess 25 per bag 2 

Dining Packets 25 per bag 2 

Paper Cups 25 per bag 3 

Gloves 10 per package 1 

Trash Bags 4 per package 1 

6 







UGR-H&S LUNCWDINNER MENU 10 

Component Unit of Issue, Servings 

Cajun Style Chicken Breast Dices with 18 per tray 

Andouille Chicken Sausage in Sauce 

Rice, Brown 18 per tray 

Mixed Vegetables No. 10 can 

Cookies, White Chocolate Chip with 27 per tray 

Cranberries 

Candy, Pan Coated Disks, Peanut Butter, 36 per box 

Plain 

Fruit Cocktail No. IO can 

ACR-U-20 

4 September 2020 

Quantity 

3 

3 

2 

2 

2 

2 

14
Vista International Technologies, Inc. 10-K 


 


Exhibit 10.25

 


  


	5151 East 56th Ave	PH: 303-288-0751	FAX: 303-288-5003	Commerce City, CO 80022


 


February 13, 2013


 


Lease Agreement Terms Between Vista International
Technologies, Inc. and Electric Power Equipment


 


	Tenant:	 	Vista International Technologies, Inc. (Vista)
	 	 	 
	Landlord:	 	Electric Power Equipment Company (EPE)
	 	 	 
	Space:	 	The leased space consists of roughly 325 square feet of office space in the EPE facility as well as a roughly 550 sq. ft. storage area located on the second floor.
	 	 	 
	Use:	 	Tenant will use the office space for general office use, and the storage space for storage of non-hazardous materials
	 	 	 
	Lease Term:	 	Initial term shall be for twelve (12) months, commencing on March 1, 2012 with semi-annual renewals for subsequent periods.  Vista must give 30 days notice prior to end of a lease period, if Vista intends not to renew.
	 	 	 
	Lease Rate:	 	Lease rate shall be a flat $350 per month for the initial 12 months, with a 3% annual increase built in for subsequent periods.
	 	 	 
	Lease payment:	 	The lease payment will be due on the First (1st) of each month.
	 	 	 
	Utilities:	 	Utilities are included in the above price, as is one internet connection.
	 	 	 
	Security Deposit:	 	None required
	 	 	 
	Condition:	 	Tenant accepts space in AS IS condition
	 	 	 
	Other Terms:	 	The parties agree that this agreement sets the terms and agreement for the lease of the office and storage space described above. The parties will come to a separate agreement covering any shop fees, parts, labor, or any other exchange between the parties.  Those separate agreements will have no effect on the terms and conditions of this agreement.


  


	sales@epecoinc.com	ISO 9001 Registered	www.epecoinc.com


 






    	 



    	 



    
 


 


Accepted by:


  


	Tom Dill	 	Tim Ruddy
	Chief Operating Officer	 	Chief Executive Officer
	Electric Power Equipment Company	 	Vista International Technologies, Inc.
	5151 East 56Th Ave.	 	 
	Commerce City, CO 80022	 	 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


  


	 		     Electric
                                                    Power Equipment Company
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT B EI LIN, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , JR . , Attorne y Ge ne ra l , Re sponde nt. No. 08-71392 Age n c y No. A098-224-878 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2014 ** B e fore : LEAVY, FISHER , a nd N.R . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. B e i Lin, a native and c i tiz e n of C hina , pe titions pro se for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a l s’ (“ B IA” ) orde r de ny ing his motion to re m a n d a nd dism issing his a

ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) de c ision de ny ing his a pplic ation for a s y lum , withholding of rem ova l, a nd re lie f unde r the C onve ntion



# F IL ED NOV 24 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Aga inst Torture . W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e grant the

pe tition for re vie w, a

n d re m an d. In upholding the

IJ’ s de nia l of re lie f, the B IA found tha t, e ve n if c re dible , Lin fa ile d to submit re a sona

ble c orroborat ion suc h a s a le tte r or a ffida

vit from his fa the r or C h ine se pa stor, a nd re a sona

ble c orroboration of his c hurc h atte nda nc e in the U nite d State s. In re a c hing the se c onc l usions, the B IA did not ha

ve the be ne fit of the c ourt’ s inte rve ning de c ision in Re n v . Holde r , 648 F.3d 1079 (9th C ir. 2011). Thus, we grant the pe tition for re vie w, a nd re m and Lin’ s c l a im s to thea ge nc y for furthe r proc e e dings c onsiste nt with this disposition. Se e IN S v . Ve ntura , 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per c uriam ). In light of our c onc lusion wedo not re a c h Lin’ s re m a ining c onte n tions, inc l uding his c ha l le nge to the B IA’ s de nia l of his m o tion to re m and. PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WG RANT E D; RE M ANDE D .

0 8 - 7 1 3 9 2 2
Montana Eighth Judicial District Court. County of Cascade.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- MICHAEL J. DANIELS, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-00-094

DECISION

On September 7, 2001, the Defendant was sentenced to the Montana State Prison for the period of thirty-five (35) years with five (5) years suspended; plus ten (10) years for the use of a weapon with five (5) years suspended for a total of forty-five (45) years with ten (10) years suspended, for the offense of Robbery, a Felony. The sentenced was ordered to run consecutive with the sentence the Defendant received in Custer County. The Defendant was granted credit for time served in the amount of thirty (30) days.

On April 6, 2004, a sentence review hearing was held pursuant to the Criminally Convicted Youth Act, §41-5-2510, MCA. The Court believed that some reduction in the “hard time” portion of his sentence was in order so that he would have an earlier opportunity at parole. Accordingly, on April 6, 2004, the Court Ordered that the Defendant’s sentence remain at forty-five (45) *70years to the Montana State Prison, with the suspended portion increased from ten (10) years to twenty (20) years. Thus the total sentence imposed by the Court was forty-five (45) years commitment to the Montana State Prison, with twenty (20) years suspended, for the offense of Robbery, a Felony. All other provisions of the Sentencing Order of September 7, 2001 were ordered to remain in full force and effect.

Done in open Court this 4th day of August, 2016.

DATED this 24th day of August, 2016.

On August 4, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Brent Getty of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member and Hon. Brad Newman, Member.