alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 1749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-422]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 11612 and <greek-i> 11613]


Hawaii Disaster <greek-i>HI-00015

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for the State of Hawaii (FEMA-1814-DR), dated 01/05/2009.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 12/10/2008 through 12/16/2008.
    Effective Date: 01/05/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/06/2009.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/05/2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance,U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 01/05/2009, applications 
for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): City and 
County of Honolulu.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      5.375
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      2.687
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      7.750
  Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit           4.500
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit           4.000
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit      4.000
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11612B 
and for economic injury is 116130.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-422 Filed 1-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
No. 09-7991.

#### Hy Thi Nguyen, Petitioner v. Britta W. Christianson.

559 U.S. 947, 130 S. Ct. 1521,

176 L. Ed. 2d 127,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1289.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
No. 09-729.

#### Carl Melvin Townes, Petitioner v. Larry W. Jarvis, Warden, et al.

559 U.S. 1005, 130 S. Ct. 1883,

176 L. Ed. 2d 363,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2651.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 577 F.3d 543.
EXHIBIT 31.2


        CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                           OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Albert J. Detz, Chief Financial Officer of theglobe.com, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of theglobe.com, inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and to the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons fulfilling the
equivalent function):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: August 13, 2004


        /s/ Albert J. Detz
        -------------------------------
        Name: Albert J. Detz
        Title: Chief Financial Officer


                                       36
# C_2016417EN.01000502.xml

| 11.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 417/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 417/5

---

EUROPEAN CHEMICALS AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2015

(2016/C 417/17)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13611/echa_annual_accounts_2015_en.pdf

---
No. 09-8322.

#### Derrick Williams, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 953, 130 S. Ct. 1543,

176 L. Ed. 2d 136,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1417,

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
No. 09-867.

#### Donald L. Morrison, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 973, 130 S. Ct. 1715,

176 L. Ed. 2d 184,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2010.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 333 Fed. Appx. 741.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4863 

To establish a pilot program in the Department of State for improvement 

of government-to-government relations with the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2006 

Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To establish a pilot program in the Department of State 

for improvement of government-to-government relations 

with the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF PILOT PROGRAM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of State, acting on 

5 behalf of the Federal Government, shall establish in the 

6 Department of State a pilot program with the Miccosukee 

7 Indian tribe for the purpose of exploring the development 

8 of more appropriate and effective arrangements for manVerDate Aug 31 2005 22:15 Mar 06, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4863.IH H4863

sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4863 IH 

1 aging relations between the Federal Government and In2 dian tribes. 

3 (b) TRANSFER OF AUTHORITIES.—Notwithstanding 

4 any other provision of law, the authorities and responsibil5 ities vested in any official or agency of the Federal Gov6 ernment with respect to managing relations between the 

7 Federal Government and the Miccosukee Indian tribe are 

8 hereby vested in the Secretary of State. 

9 (c) CONSULTATION AND COOPERATION.—The Sec10 retary of State may consult with any official of the Federal 

11 Government, and such official shall cooperate with the 

12 Secretary, with respect to any aspect of the management 

13 of relations between the Federal Government and Indian 

14 tribes. 

15 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

16 (1) INDIAN.—The term ‘‘Indian’’ has the mean17 ing given such term in section 4(d) of the Indian 

18 Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act 

19 (25 U.S.C. 450b(d)). 

20 (2) INDIAN TRIBE.—The term ‘‘Indian tribe’’ 

21 has the meaning given such term in section 4(e) of 

22 the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assist23 ance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b(e)). 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4863 IH 

1 (3) MICCOSUKEE INDIAN TRIBE.—The term 

2 ‘‘Miccosukee Indian tribe’’ means the Miccosukee 

3 tribe of Indians in Florida. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
No. 09-8830.

#### Lee Michael Sterhan, Petitioner v. Michigan.

559 U.S. 1040, 130 S. Ct. 2068,

176 L. Ed. 2d 420,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2880.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
APP B

 DSCPM 4155.2

************************

• MONOGRAPH NO.: 3A8

************************

ITEM: Cake, Spice (SCA)

 Thermohydrostabilized

NSN: 8920-01-144-0565 ITEM SPECIFICATION: MIL-C-44235

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 207

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

 APPEARANCE: Dense, medium grained cake with some airholes.

Color profile: Brown crusted top, thicker brown bottom crust, tan

color with spice specks.

 ODOR: Slightly sweet with a mild spice aroma.

 FLAVOR: Sweet, mild spice, slight nutmeg, and a slightly eggy

flavor.

 TEXTURE: Dense, very slightly moist to dry.

 ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT 70 DEGREES F: 36 months

 80 DEGREES F: 24 months

 90 DEGREES F: 18 months

 100 DEGREES F: 12 months

EXPECTED DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

 APPEARANCE: Product will become slightly darker or golden tan.

 ODOR: Product may become stale or lose some spice aroma.

 FLAVOR: Slightly stale and may exhibit a loss of the spice

flavor.

 TEXTURE: Product may become slightly more dense or may become

more dry.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: Heating improves odor,

flavor and texture.

SPECIAL NOTES: Can is designed to yield 18 portions cut 3 rows x 6 rows each

(67 grams).
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 **ANNUALSTATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreementdated as of July 25, 2017, by and among MORGAN STANLEY CAPITAL I INC., asDepositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator and Custodian and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as OperatingAdvisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2017-237P (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.8 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton,Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.      A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicerhas fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
### Adams, Kevin (OST)



# .

# . -. ,...f.rom:
. Adams, Kevin (OST)



### ... Sent:· To: 

### Cc: Subject: Attachments:

Dear Mr. Hatter: Friday, June 22, 2012 1:33 PM Alaska DOT, Richard Sewell; Alaska DOT, Linda Bustamante ; Cronkhite, Rebecca J(DOT) (rebecca.cronkhite@alaska.gov); Alaska DOT, Steven D. Hatter Adventure@NorthernAiaska.com; 'Kieary@evertsair.com'; 'jw69p11@hotmail.com'; 'info@doyon.com'; JleBakerOS@Yahoo.com; 'kboyd@yksd:com' Request for comment, Docket 2004-17563 Warbelows Proposal at Minto and Manley.pdf; Tatonduk, Proposal at Minto and Manley.pdf

Attached above are copies of the proposals submitted byWarbelows, the incumbent, and Tatonduk, to provide EAS to Manley and Minto, Alaska. Theywere the onlytimely-filed proposals, and we have taken them to dockets. The comments of the communities arid state are a critically important element in our carrier-selection decision. We askthatyou, and the other parties, get backto us, preferably by email, no**lat~r** .than July 24, 2012. Iwill docketthis email, as weli as any replies. · · i> "" · • In brief, look at the proposals, and if you have questions, call either of the carriers or me,and get backto us bythe deadline.
Sest Kevin Adams Industry Economist 202-366-1047

1
No. 09-305.

#### Scott Kerns, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 970, 130 S. Ct. 1686,

176 L. Ed. 2d 179,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2090.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 479

AN ACT

To replace a Coastal Barrier Resources System map relating 

to Coastal Barrier Resources System Grayton Beach 

Unit FL–95P in Walton County, Florida.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 479 EH

1 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF COASTAL BARRIER RE2 SOURCES SYSTEM MAP RELATING TO 

3 GRAYTON BEACH UNIT FL–95P IN WALTON 

4 COUNTY, FLORIDA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The map described in subsection 

6 (b) relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System unit 

7 Grayton Beach Unit FL–95P, located in Walton County, 

8 Florida, as included in the set of maps entitled ‘‘Coastal 

9 Barrier Resources System’’ referred to in section 4(a) of 

10 the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)), 

11 is hereby replaced by another map relating to that unit 

12 entitled ‘‘Grayton Beach Unit FL–95P and Draper Lake 

13 Unit FL–96’’ and dated ‘‘July 24, 2006’’. 

14 (b) REPLACED MAP DESCRIBED.—The map replaced 

15 under subsection (a) is subtitled ‘‘COASTAL BARRIER 

16 RESOURCES SYSTEM GRAYTON BEACH UNIT 

17 FL–95P DRAPER LAKE UNIT FL–96’’ and dated Oc18 tober 24, 1990. 

19 (c) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

20 shall keep the maps referred to in subsections (a) on file 

21 and available for inspection in accordance with the provi-
3

•HR 479 EH

1 sions of section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act 

2 (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)). 

Passed the House of Representatives September 12, 

2006. 

Attest:

Clerk. 
109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 479

AN ACT

To replace a Coastal Barrier Resources System 

County, Florida.tem Grayton Beach Unit FL–95P in Walton map relating to Coastal Barrier Resources Sys-
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

JORGE OLMOS

,
Appellant,

v.

DIANE OLMOS

,
Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 2 4

- 00 15 3

- CV

Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 5

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2022DCM4800 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Because Appellant’s notice of appeal is untimely, we dismiss

the appeal.

A party perfects a civil appeal by timely filing a notice of appeal within 30 days after a

final judgment is signed. Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. A timely post

- trial motion, such as a motion for

new trial, extends the timeline for perfecting an appeal to 90 days after the judgment is signed. Id.

26.1(a)(1). A motion for new trial is timely filed within 30 days of the date the judgment is signed.

Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(a).

Here, Appellant filed a motion for new trial on February 22 , 2024, and a notice of appeal

on July 1, 2024, attempting to appeal the trial court’s final divorce decree signed on February 5,2

2024

. On July 1, 2024, the Clerk of this Court sent Appellant a letter indicating that the appeal was

not timely perfected. The letter gave notice of our intent to dismiss the appeal for want of

jurisdiction after 20 days unless grounds were shown for the Court to continue the appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). As of the date of this order, Appellant has not responded to this Court’s

notice

.
Accordingly, we find Appellant failed to perfect his appeal because he filed the notice of

appeal outside of the applicable time limits. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Id.

26.1 ; 42.3(a), (c) ; 43.2(f).

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

July 29, 2024

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, J J.
No. 09-7370.

#### Clemente Javier Aguire-Jarquin, Petitioner v. Florida.

559 U.S. 942, 130 S. Ct. 1505,

176 L. Ed. 2d 118,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1229.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 9 So. 3d 593.
No. 09-8427.

#### Keith Russell Judd, Petitioner v. New Mexico.

559 U.S. 1010, 130 S. Ct. 1885,

176 L. Ed. 2d 370,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2580,

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New Mexico denied.
# C_2017278EN.01000202.xml

| 22.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8359 — Amundi/Crédit Agricole/Pioneer Investments)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 278/04)

On 24 March 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8359. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8359. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

# AGENCY:

Employment and Training Administration, Labor. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces a change in benefit period eligibility under the EB program for Nevada and Wisconsin. 

The following change has occurred since the publication of the last notice regarding the State's EB status: 
      - The 13-week insured unemployment rate (IUR) for Nevada and Wisconsin for the week ending February 07, 2009, rose above 5.0 percent and exceeded 120 percent of the corresponding average rate in the two prior years. Therefore, beginning the week of February 22, 2009, eligible unemployed workers will be able to collect up to an additional 13 weeks of UI benefits.

## Information for Claimants 

The duration of benefits payable in the EB program, and the terms and conditions on which they are payable, are governed by the Federal-State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970, as amended, and the operating instructions issued to the states by the U.S. Department of Labor. In the case of a state beginning an EB period, the State Workforce Agency will furnish a written notice of potential entitlement to each individual who has exhausted all rights to regular benefits and is potentially eligible for EB (20 CFR 615.13(c)(1)). 

Persons who believe they may be entitled to EB or who wish to inquire about their rights under the program should contact their State Workforce Agency. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Scott Gibbons, U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Office of Workforce Security, 200 Constitution Avenue,  NW., Frances Perkins Bldg., Room S-4231, Washington, DC 20210, telephone number (202) 693-3008 (this is not a toll-free number) or by e-mail:                         *gibbons.scott@dol.gov.*

Signed in Washington, DC, this 26th day of February 2009. 

Douglas F. Small, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary,  Employment and Training Administration.

 [FR Doc. E9-4625 Filed 3-4-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FW-P