alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

     Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 1350


     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Dover
Petroleum Corp. (the "Company")for the quarter ending March 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.


Date: January 15, 2004            /s/ Robert Salna


                                   Robert Salna, Principal Financial
                                   Officer



     The foregoing certification accompanied the Quarterly Report on
Form 10QSB filing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is being
reproduced herein for information only.  It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company, whether made before or after hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.  A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
No. 09-8177.

#### Steven Crain, Petitioner v. Ronald N. Tutor, et al.

559 U.S. 977, 130 S. Ct. 1696,

176 L. Ed. 2d 189,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2068.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 09-8229.

#### Tony A. Wilson, Petitioner v. Sahbra S. Jacobs.

559 U.S. 978, 130 S. Ct. 1700,

176 L. Ed. 2d 191,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2012.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 350 Fed. Appx. 614.
No. 09-8631.

#### Veronica M. Allen, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 961, 130 S. Ct. 1564,

176 L. Ed. 2d 149,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1372.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 587 F.3d 246.
Amendment to Executive Officer Benefits Agreement



 Exhibit 10.57 
 AMENDMENT TO BENEFITS AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment to the Executive Officer
Benefits Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of October 29, 2010 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Power Integrations, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”) and Sandeep Nayyar (“Executive”). 
 RECITALS 

A. The Company has previously entered into an Executive Officer Benefits Agreement with Executive, dated July 22, 2010 (the
“Benefits Agreement”). 
 B. Pursuant to Section 1(f) of the Agreement, Executive is not eligible
to receive the benefits under the Agreement until the completion of one year of continuous service as an executive officer of the Company. 
 C. The Company and Executive wish to amend the Benefits Agreement to permit Executive to receive earlier the benefits conferrable upon a change of control of the Company pursuant to the Agreement during
the first year of continuous service to the Company as an executive officer. 
 AGREEMENT 

THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements, covenants and considerations contained herein, the undersigned hereby agree
and acknowledge as follows: 
 1. With reference to Section 1(f) of the Agreement, the Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors has determined that during the first year of continuous service as an executive officer of the Company, Executive shall be entitled to the benefits under this Agreement other than with respect to Sections 5, 6 and 7 of the Agreement.
Executive shall not be entitled to the benefits under Sections 5, 6 and 7 of the Agreement until the completion of one year of continuous service as an executive officer of the Company. 

2. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

[SIGNATURE PAGE TO IMMEDIATELY FOLLOW] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
Company and Executive have executed this Amendment on the dates set forth below, to be effective immediately as of the Effective Date. 
  

			
	POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.


			
		
	By:	 	   /S/ Balu
Balakrishnan



			
		
	Its:	 	   Chief Executive
Officer



			
		
	Date:	 	   October 29, 2010

	
	SANDEEP NAYYAR
	
	 /S/ Sandeep Nayyar

		
	Date:	 	   October 29, 2010



  
 - 2 -
No. 09-8503.

#### Marco Todd, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 958, 130 S. Ct. 1557,

176 L. Ed. 2d 145,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1174.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1




                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-55179 of Koger Equity, Inc. on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-54617
of Koger Equity, Inc. on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-20975 of Koger
Equity, Inc. on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-23429 of Koger Equity,
Inc. on Form S-8, and Registration Statement No. 333-37919 of Koger Equity, Inc.
on Form S-3 of our report dated February 18, 2000, appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Koger Equity, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1999.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Jacksonville, Florida
March 24, 2000
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $7.75 CWT 0.965 $7.4788

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.4483 LB 3.5 $8.5691

Class I Price $16.0478

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $8.65 CWT 0.965 $8.3473

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.4428 LB 3.5 $8.5498

Class I Price $16.8971

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT ($0.8492)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.0730)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.0365)

Price change per quart ($0.0183)

Price change per pint ($0.0091)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.0066)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.0055)

Price change per half pint ($0.0046)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.07)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.04)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.02)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.01)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.01)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.01)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.00)

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: April 2, 2017
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 37 (Thursday, February 26, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 8756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4123]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 55

[EPA-R04-OAR-2008-0605; FRL-8769-5]


Outer Continental Shelf Air Regulations Consistency Update for 
Florida

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 31, 2008, EPA published a document finalizing the 
update of the Florida Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Air Regulations. 
That document inadvertently listed the incorrect filing action date for 
petitions for judicial review. This document corrects that inadvertent 
error.

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on February 26, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Lakeman, Air Permit Section, Air 
Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., 
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is (404) 562-9043. 
Mr. Lakeman can also be reached via electronic mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#573b363c323a363979243236391732273679303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d6bab7bdb3bbb7b8f8a5b3b7b896b3a6b7f8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA is making a correction to the document 
published on December 31, 2008 (73 FR 78196), finalizing the update of 
the Florida OCS Air Regulations. EPA made an inadvertent error on page 
78197, column 2, last full paragraph. This paragraph begins with the 
phrase, ``Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial 
review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of 
Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 17, 2008''. This date 
does not correctly allow for the 60 day filing period. EPA is now 
correcting the date on page 78197, column 2, last full paragraph by 
replacing it with the following date: ``March 1, 2009''.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: January 20, 2009.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. E9-4123 Filed 2-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### ~ 

### Ministry of Transport**~** TE MANAT O WAKA

IRBUSA-A 22 January 2015 Director Office of International Aviation Department of Transportation 400 Seventh Street SW Room 6402 Washington D.C. 20590 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Dear Director This letter is to advise that, in addition to the charter rights exchanged between our two countries pursuant to the Multilateral Agreement on the Liberalization ofInternational Air Transportation, New Zealand will continue to grant approval for United States air carriers to operate seventh freedom passenger charter flights on the understanding that the United States would grant similar rights to air carriers of New Zealand. This confirmation is consistent · with our letter to your office of 24 October 2013, provided in similar circumstances. Yours sincerely

Glen-Marie Burns Manager Aviation and Security

""1 www.transport.govt.nz HEAD OFF ICE: PO Box 3175, Wellington 6140, New Zealand. TEL: 04 439 9000, FAX: 04 439 9001 AUCKLAND O FFICE: The New Zealand Government- Auckland Policy Office, PO Box 106 238, Auckland City 1143, New Zealand. TEL: •64 9 985 4827, F AX: •64 9 985 4849 CHR ISTCHURCH OFFICE: PO Box 3014, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand . TEL: •64 3 366 9304, FAX: •64 3 366 9317
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4700 

To provide for the conditional conveyance of any interest retained by the 

United States in St. Joseph Memorial Hall in St. Joseph, Michigan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2006 

Mr. UPTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To provide for the conditional conveyance of any interest 

retained by the United States in St. Joseph Memorial 

Hall in St. Joseph, Michigan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF RETAINED INTEREST IN ST. 

4 JOSEPH MEMORIAL HALL. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the terms and condi6 tions of subsection (c), the Administrator of General Serv7 ices shall convey to the city of St. Joseph, Michigan, by 

8 quitclaim deed, any interest retained by the United States 

9 in St. Joseph Memorial Hall. 
2 

•HR 4700 IH 

1 (b) ST. JOSEPH MEMORIAL HALL.—In this section, 

2 the term ‘‘St. Joseph Memorial Hall’’ means the property 

3 subject to a conveyance from the Secretary of Commerce 

4 to the city of St. Joseph, Michigan, by Quitclaim Deed 

5 dated May 9, 1936, recorded in Liber 310, at page 404, 

6 in the Register of Deeds for Berrien County, Michigan. 

7 (c) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The conveyance 

8 under subsection (a) is subject to the following terms and 

9 conditions: 

10 (1) CONSIDERATION.—As consideration for the 

11 conveyance under subsection (a), the City of St. Jo12 seph, Michigan, shall pay $10,000.00 to the United 

13 States. 

14 (2) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.— 

15 The Administrator of General Services may require 

16 such additional terms and conditions to the convey17 ance under subsection (a) as the Administrator con18 siders appropriate to protect the interest of the 

19 United States. 

Æ
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**     I, Frank T. Sample, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the registrant, Visicu, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;          (b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];          (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on suchevaluation; and          (d) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Dated: August 6, 2007 By:  /s/ Frank T. Sample    Frank T. Sample    President, Chief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board of Directors
# C_2017222EN.01000102.xml

| 11.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8273 — Standard/Braas Monier)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 222/02)

On 27 March 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8273. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8273. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
3 December 2018 **************************

NSN: 8915-01-525-9671 (AMP) * MONOGRAPH NO: M5M

 ************************** 

Item: Applesauce, with mango and peach puree, sweetened, regular style (Type VIII)

Document: PCR-F-002D

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 110 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Applesauce shall contain mango and peach purees and shall be a bright golden yelloworange color.

Odor: A moderate to strong sweetened mango and peach.

Flavor: A moderate to strong sweetened mango and peach; free from astringent flavor. 

Texture: A smooth, fine pulp.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Excessive darkening. Excessive syneresis to extreme runniness.

Odor: Lacks sweet mango peach odor. Fermented, sour, musty.

Flavor: Lacks sweetened mango and peach flavor. Musty, old, overly tart or sour, bitter, 

caramelized, fermented.

Texture: Moderate to extreme weeping of fluids from pulp (See Unique Examination 

Procedures).

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

To examine for excessive weeping, pour product onto a flat unrestricted surface (e.g., bottom of paper 

plate or cookie sheet) and observe for approximately one minute before making your determination.

Special Notes

Product is normally produced from canned applesauce by heating and filling at pasteurization 

temperatures. This alters the overall quality of the product compared to applesauce that has only been 

canned one time. The variety of apples used will also noticeably affect quality factors such as color, 

odor, taste and texture. Serviceability judgments must be made with these factors in mind. Applesauce 

color is expected to darken only slightly throughout within a few months after DoP. This color change 

is unavoidable. Once the product color has changed as described, it is not expected to worsen 

appreciably unless storage conditions are unfavorable. Color should not be the deciding factor unless it 

is so aesthetically objectionable that the product is unlikely to be consumed.
----

 Exhibit 32.1 

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent  required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive  Officer of VIPC Communications, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly  Report of the company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2002, fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the company’s financial condition and results  of operations. 

October 10, 2003

/s/ Zhang Lebing                                           Zhang Lebing, Chief Executive Officer 

----
Montana Eighth Judicial District Court. County of Cascade.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- KRISTIAN UNDERDAHL, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. CDJ-12-084

DECISION

On June 17, 2014, the Court ordered that the Consent Decree in this matter be Revoked and the Court transferred supervision to the District Court pursuant to §41-5-208(3), MCA. It was further ordered that the Youth be committed to the Montana Department of Corrections for placement in an adult correctional facility until the age 25, for the offense of Count I: Sexual Intercourse Without Consent, a Felony, in violation of §45-5-503(1) and (3)(a), MCA. It was further ordered that the Youth would remain subject to all of the previously imposed conditions set forth in the Consent Decree which is on file and was incorporated herein by reference.

On May 6, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Meghan Lulf Sutton of Sutton, Dubois & Mills, PLLC law firm. The State was represented by Cascade County Deputy Attorney Jennifer Quick. Appearing at the hearing was the mother of the victim, Christine Cooper, who testified. Also present was the victim’s grandfather, Patrick Cooper. The Defendant’s parents, Brent and Carrie Underdahl were present and the father testified.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also *60increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Done in open Court this 6th day of May, 2016.

DATED this 10th day of June, 2016.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member.