alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-7549.

#### Judith Diane Valot, Petitioner v. Mary Lattimore, Warden.

565 U.S. 1167, 132 S. Ct. 1115,

181 L. Ed. 2d 996,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 862.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 09-8241.

#### Henry F. Weber, Petitioner v. Burl Cain, Warden.

559 U.S. 978, 130 S. Ct. 1701,

176 L. Ed. 2d 192,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2188.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 09-8769.

#### John Tarkowski, Petitioner v. Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

559 U.S. 1015, 130 S. Ct. 1904,

176 L. Ed. 2d 380,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2555.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 352 Fed. Appx. 418.
No. 09-643.

#### Carl H. Brown, Petitioner v. Marriott International, Incorporated.

559 U.S. 937, 130 S. Ct. 1512,

176 L. Ed. 2d 111,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1359.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 330 Fed. Appx. 27.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0207

_________________

HELEN WEEMS AND JANE DOE,

 Plaintiffs and Appellees,,

 v.

STATE OF MONTANA, by and through AUSTIN 

KNUDSEN, in his official capacity as Attorney 

General; and TRAVIS R. AHNER, in his official 

capacity as County Attorney for Flathead County,

 Defendants and Appellants.

O R D E R

_________________

Upon consideration of Appellants’ motion for extension of time to file their reply 

brief and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellants have until October 14, 2022, to file 

their reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 26 2022

09/26/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0207
(a)  A review of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation’s activities and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 15, 2017 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC, as seller, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”) and sponsor, and Toyota Auto Receivables 2017-D Owner Trust, as issuer, during the period from November 15, 2017 to December 31, 2017 has been made under my supervision.
  (b)  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.
 
  
 /s/ Wei Shi
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-3 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer International Puerto Rico LLC (the Subservicer), does
hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Subservicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2017, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Drive
Auto Receivables Trust 2017-3 and Wilmington Trust, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the activities and performance of the Subservicer under the Servicing Agreement, dated July 15, 2016 (the Servicing Agreement), by and between Santander Consumer USA Inc. and Santander
Consumer International Puerto Rico LLC, and the related Second Amended and Restated Program Portfolio Schedule (Publicly Registered Transactions), dated as of June 28, 2017 (the Second Amended and Restated Program Portfolio Schedule, together
with the Servicing Agreement, the Subservicing Agreement), during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement and the Subservicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the
subject of the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER INTERNATIONAL PUERTO RICO LLCBy:

/s/ Jose RamirezName:

Jose RamirezTitle:

Vice President of Servicing for Santander Consumer International Puerto Rico, LLCDate:

March 30, 2018
l£,324-0U>

CAUSE NO. 0628183-D

OILN RAY NOWLIN

APPLICANT/PRO SE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPLEAS

VS OF tMPs1"10^0!^

THE STATE OF TEXAS

RESPONDANT CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN TEXAT

MOTION FOR A REQUEST

FOR' A1WRITEN .OPINION

TO THE HONORABLE PRESIDING JUDGE KELLER

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

FEB 17 2015

AbelAcosla,Cleric

NOW COME SAID APPLICANT OLIN"'RAY NOWEIN/PRO SEE IN THE ABOVE

STYLED NUMBERED 0628183-D AND SUBMITS HIS.MOTION FOR A REQUr

EST FOR A WRITEN OPINION THE:'APPLICANT FILES WITHOUT AN

ATTORNEY ON RECORD

THE APPLICANT FILE AN MOTION'.FOR OBJECTIONS OF THE LOWER STATE

COUET NO. #2 REPLY THIS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS RETURN ,

ITS REPLY TO THE APPLICANT DENYING HIS MOTION AND SUCCESSIVE

WRIT WITHOUT ANY CONCLUSION OF LAW FOR TOKDENIED THE APPLI

CANT MOTION AND PETITION WITHOUT ANY WRITEN OPINION,
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED

OLIN RAY NOWLIN

TDCJ-ID NO. #824386

MARK STILES UNIT

BEAUMONT, TEXAS 77705

OLIN RAY NOWLIN

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT A TRUE AND CERRECT COPY

OF THE FOREGOING WAS MAILED:TO THE COURT CLERK TO PASS COPIES

TO THOSE THAT ARE. CONCERN UNDER 121;(2) A INMATE MAKES ONLY ONE

COPY TO THE COURT AND REQUEST THEM TO-MAKE:1 COPIES FOR HIM -BE

CAUSE OF HIM BEING INDIGENT AND NOT ABIE TO MAKE COPIES

SEN TON THIS /%_DAY OF fi^jhrtjtfLxsy , 2015

SIGN ON THIS /l.DAY OF /^V/y/Ht/j/ 2015

SIGNATURE CU^mp(

(2)
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Brownie’s Marine Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
 
 1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 
 Date:  August 13,
      2009
              By:
              /s/ Robert
      M. CarmichaelName:
              Robert
      M. CarmichaelTitle:
              Chief
      Executive Officer
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Brownie’s Marine Group, Inc. and will be
retained by Brownie’s Marine Group, Inc. and furnished to the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7260

CHARLES LEON LEWIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BOBBY SOLES, Superintendent,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.

(CA-98-644-2)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 3, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Leon Lewis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Leon Lewis appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Lewis v. Soles, No. CA-98-644-2 (E.D. Va. July

31, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2

NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the annual report of Novellus Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jeffrey C. Benzing, Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of
the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.



|                        |  |     |  |                                                          
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 24, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Jeffrey C. Benzing                                   
|                        |  |     |  | Jeffrey C. Benzing                                       
|                        |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and
Chief Administrative Officer
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual report of Nexgen Biofuels, Ltd. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ram Ajjarapu,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

          /s/ Ram Ajjarapu
          ----------------------------------
          Ram Ajjarapu
          Title: Chief Executive Officer and Director
          Date: April 15, 2009
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MALISSA MARSHALL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-55

[July 14, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Rosemarie Scher, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2016-CF-003759-AXXX-MB.

Malissa Marshall, Brooksville, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 09-8677.

#### Gary Ervin, Petitioner v. Ohio.

559 U.S. 1014, 130 S. Ct. 1900,

176 L. Ed. 2d 378,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2657.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County, denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL03-37-011]

Take notice that on February 17, 2009, the New England Power Company submitted a compliance filing in accordance with the Commission's Order on Remand dated January 15, 2009.

Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov.*                     Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov,*                     using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*                     or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 10, 2009.                

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E9-4420 Filed 3-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
No. 09-798.

#### Niranjan Lal, Petitioner v. United States Life Insurance Company.

559 U.S. 992, 130 S. Ct. 1740,

176 L. Ed. 2d 214,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2322.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 345 Fed. Appx. 144.
No. 09-8442.

#### James Knowles, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

559 U.S. 981, 130 S. Ct. 1709,

176 L. Ed. 2d 196,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2171.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4911 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4911

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To temporarily extend the programs under the Higher Education Act of 
                     1965, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Higher Education Extension Act of 
2006''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAMS.

    Section 2(a) of the Higher Education Extension Act of 2005 (Public 
Law 109-81; 20 U.S.C. 1001 note) is amended by striking ``March 31, 
2006'' and inserting ``June 30, 2006''.

SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    Nothing in this Act, or in the Higher Education Extension Act of 
2005 as amended by this Act, shall be construed to limit or otherwise 
alter the authorizations of appropriations for, or the durations of, 
programs contained in the amendments made by the Higher Education 
Reconciliation Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-171) to the provisions of 
the Higher Education Act of 1965 and the Taxpayer-Teacher Protection 
Act of 2004.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 14, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4911

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To temporarily extend the programs under the Higher Education Act of 
                     1965, and for other purposes.
```
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF HAMILTON, RABINOVITZ & ALSCHULER, INC.



Hamilton, Rabinovitz & Alschuler (HR&A) consents to being named in American Standard Companies Inc.s Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005 in the form and context in which HR&A is named and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 pertaining to the 2002 Omnibus Incentive
Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Registration No. 333-96547), Form S-3 pertaining to the registration of $1.0 billion of debt securities (Registration No. 333-67943), Form S-8 pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(Registration No. 333-40575), Form S-8 pertaining to the Deferred Compensation Plan (Registration No. 333-75492), Form S-8 pertaining to the Supplemental Compensation Plan for Outside Directors (Registration No. 333-109562) and Form
S-8 pertaining to the Stock Incentive Plan (Registration Nos. 333-65252 and 033-63007). HR&A does not authorize or cause the filing of such Annual Report and does not make or purport to make any statement other than as reflected in the Annual
Report.



|                                
|--------------------------------
|/s/ Francine F. Rabinovitz      
|Hamilton, Rabinovitz & Alschuler
|                                
|February 8, 2006
Exhibit 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Maximum Dynamics, Inc. a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Joshua Wolcott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
         of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Maximum Dynamics, Inc., and will be retained by Maximum Dynamics,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


/s/ Joshua Wolcott
--------------------------
Joshua Wolcott
Chief Financial Officer
August 18, 2003
No. 09-7246.

#### Calvin Tucker, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 993, 130 S. Ct. 1736,

176 L. Ed. 2d 214,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2319.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 332 Fed. Appx. 563.
No. 09-7800.

#### Augustine Rizzo, Petitioner v. David Rock, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility.

559 U.S. 963, 130 S. Ct. 1508,

176 L. Ed. 2d 152,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1050.

February 22, 2010.

Motion of petitioner to defer consideration of the petition for writ of certiorari denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
No. 09-8098.

#### Margaret Thomas, Petitioner v. Office of Personnel Management.

559 U.S. 1046, 130 S. Ct. 2087,

176 L. Ed. 2d 433,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2875.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 914, 130 S. Ct. 1320, 175 L. Ed. 2d 1091, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 920.