alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4841 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4841

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
    To amend the Ojito Wilderness Act to make a technical correction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. OJITO WILDERNESS MAP.
    Section 2(1) of the Ojito Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1132 note; 
Public Law 109-94) is amended by striking ``October 1, 2004'' and 
inserting ``January 24, 2006''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.44

Fiducia Ltd.
Fourth Floor
British America Building
P.O. Box HM3143
Hamilton, Bermuda HM NX

                                                                    March , 2002

Ladies and Gentlemen,

          In connection with the recapitalization of ourselves and our
subsidiary, APCOA/Standard Parking, Inc. ("APCOA"), Fiducia Ltd. ("you" or
"Fiducia") agreed to have cash interest payments on approximately $29.9 million
aggregate principal amount ($35.1 million face amount) of our 11 1/4% Senior
Discount Notes due 2008 (the "Notes") delayed until March 15, 2007 (the
"Waiver").

          As consideration for the Waiver, in a letter dated January 11, 2002,
we agreed to pledge to you approximately 20.4169 shares of Series C Preferred
Stock issued by APCOA and owned by us with an aggregate liquidation preference
of approximately $30,779,166 as of the date of such letter (the "Pledged
Preferred Stock"), to secure our payment obligations under the Notes. We further
agreed to use our best efforts to enter into customary agreements within 60 days
of the date of such letter, to facilitate our granting you a security interest
in the Pledged Preferred Stock.

          In furtherance of our ongoing efforts to strengthen our financial
position for the benefit of the holders of our obligations, we hereby request an
extension of 90 days in addition to the original 60 days granted to enter into
such customary agreements. Your signature acknowledging this letter will be
deemed agreement to such extension.

          The internal law of the state of New York shall govern and be used to
construe this Agreement.

                                                  AP Holdings, Inc.

                                                  By:
                                                     --------------------------
                                                  Name:
                                                  Title:

                            [acknowledgment follows]

<Page>

ACKNOWLEDGED

Fiducia Ltd.

By:
   ----------------------------
    Name:
    Title:
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00013-CV

IN RE R. Wayne JOHNSON

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 8, 2012

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On January 9, 2012, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has 

considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled 

to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 12,810, styled R. Wayne Johnson v. Elroy Garcia and James Allison, in 

the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas, the Honorable N. Keith Williams presiding.
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4647 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 22, 2005 

Received 

JANUARY 27, 2006 

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend the USA PATRIOT ACT to extend the sunset 

of certain provisions of such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 4647 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE 

2 USA PATRIOT ACT. 

3 Section 224(a) of the Uniting and Strengthening 

4 America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to 

5 Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) 

6 Act of 2001 (Public Law 107–56; 115 Stat. 295) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2005’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘February 3, 2006’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 22, 

2005. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk.
No. 09-9033.

#### Michael Prescott, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1031, 130 S. Ct. 1919,

176 L. Ed. 2d 404,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2370.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 360 Fed. Appx. 209.
No. 11-6378.

#### Roberto Vera-Gonzalez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1116, 132 S. Ct. 1003,

181 L. Ed. 2d 744,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 387.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 429 Fed. Appx. 435.
No. 11-7440.

#### Arlene Katai, Petitioner v. New Jersey.

565 U.S. 1166, 132 S. Ct. 1112,

181 L. Ed. 2d 994,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 799.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, denied.
Montana Fifteenth Judicial District Court. County of Roosevelt.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- KELLY MARIE SEVERSON, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-14-037

DECISION

On January 26, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a commitment to the Montana Department of Corrections for a term of ten (10) years, with eight (8) years suspended, for the offense of Count I: Criminal Possession with Intent to Distribute, a felony, in violation of §45-6-103, MCA. The Defendant shall be given credit for forty-three (43) days of time served. Count II: Criminal Distribution of Dangerous Drugs, a felony, in violation of §45-9-101; and Count III: Criminal Possession of Drug Paraphernalia, a misdemeanor, in violation of §45-10-103 were dismissed. The Notice of Persistent Felony Offender was withdrawn.

On April 8, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant appeared by video conferencing from the Choteau County Jail and was represented by Peter Ohman of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is *33AFFIRMED.

Done in open Court this 8th day of April, 2016.

DATED this 3rd day of May, 2016.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member and Hon. Brad Newman, Member.
-78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0

38.5 39.0 39.5 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 08/30 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
No. 09-7970.

#### Bernard Murphy, Petitioner v. George T. Hagan, Warden.

559 U.S. 947, 130 S. Ct. 1520,

176 L. Ed. 2d 126,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1192.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 332 Fed. Appx. 854.
DENT

Table IV, Defect No. 208 – Lower limit of a minor defect. A 

slight indentation with moderately acute crimping of the body 

wall resulting in a related minor defect as the end seam is 

pulled out of position slightly. Must be studied carefully to 

detect the malposition (minor defect).
Vista International Technologies, Inc. 10-K


 


Exhibit 10.22


 


RELEASE OF CONTRACT


 


	DATE:	 	January 18, 2012	 	GF NO.  2111-00208
	SELLER:	 	Vista International Technologies, Inc.	 	 
	PURCHASER:	 	Brown-Lewisville Railroad Family First Limited Partnership	 	 


 


	RE:	 	PURCHASE AND SALE CONTRACT, by and between Vista International Technologies, Inc., (as Seller) and Brown-Lewisville Railroad Family First Limited Partnership(as Purchaser), dated effective February 17, 2011 (the Contract); Property: approximately 26.9 acres, located in Dallas County, Texas


 


The undersigned parties to the above described
Earnest Money Contract, do hereby release all parties thereto from said Contract, and do declare said Earnest Money Contract to
be null and void and of no further force and effect, and further declare said Earnest Money Contract to be in all things canceled.


 


The undersigned further agree and authorize
Chicago Title Insurance Company to release funds all ready deposited as itemized below:


 


	 	Earnest Money Deposit	 	$25,000.00
	 	 	 	 
	Release:	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	To Seller:	 	$100.00
	 	To Purchaser:	 	$24,900.00 plus accrued interest


 


IN SIGNING SAID RELEASE OF CONTRACT
PURCHASER WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE TO DEPOSIT ANY FURTHER MONEY TO CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY AND IS HEREBY RELEASED OF ANY
LIABILITY AND/OR RESPONSIBILITY THEREOF. 


 


	PURCHASER:	 
	 	 
	Brown-Lewisville Railroad Family First Limited Partnership	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:  BLRR Management, LLC	 
	 	Its:  General Partner	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Name:	 	 
	 	 	Title:	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 





	SELLER:	 
	 	 
	Vista International Technologies, Inc.	 
	 	 
	 	 	By:	 	 
	 	 	Name:	 	 
	 	 	Title:
No. 09-9039.

#### Cynthia V. Shank, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1021, 130 S. Ct. 1919,

176 L. Ed. 2d 390,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2399.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 591 F.3d 491.
Exhibit 32.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Form 10-QSB of China Autoparts, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Li Yungao, CEO of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Li Yungao
--------------------
Li Yungao
CEO
Date: August 13, 2004
No. 11-6616.

#### Paul Blackmer, Petitioner v. Social Security Administration.

565 U.S. 1155, 132 S. Ct. 1134,

181 L. Ed. 2d 974,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 800.

January 17, 2012.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                      CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sturgis Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian P. Hoggatt,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

         3.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         4.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ Brian P. Hoggatt
Date   August 13, 2002                _________________________________________
                                      Brian P. Hoggatt, Chief Financial Officer



                                      -66-
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


Novellus Systems, Ltd.
Unit 1EB, Bishops Weald House,
Albion Way,
Horsham, West Sussex
RH12 1AH, England
T 44.1403.265550
F 44.1403.266554


Novellus Systems, BV
Dillenburgstraat 5 B
5652 AM Eindhoven The
Netherlands
T 31.40.291.8010
F 31.40.257.3590


Novellus Systems GmbH
Manfred-von-Ardenni-Ring 20,
01099 Dresden,
Germany
T 49.351.89252.10
F 49.351.89252.20


Novellus Systems Ireland Ltd
IR4-1-10,
Collinstown Industrial Park,
Leixlip
Co. Kildare., Ireland
T 353.1.606.5247
F 353.1.606.5180


Novellus Systems Israel Ltd
Asia House, 4 Weizmann Street
64239 Tel-Aviv
Israel


Novellus Systems SARL
Parc de la Julienne, Bat. D, 1 er etage,
91830 Le Coudray - Montceaux
France
T 33.1.64.93.7070
F 33.1.64.93.8787


Novellus Systems Spain
Avenida Diagonal, 482
Barcelona 08006
Spain


Nippon Novellus Systems, KK
K5P Bldg., R&D C-10F,
3-2-1 Sakado, Takatsu-Ku, Kawasaki-shi
Kanagawa-ken 213, Japan
T 81.44.850.1777
F 81.44.850.1778


Novellus Systems Korea
2F DaeWoo Engineering Bldg., 9-3 SuNae-Dong,
BunDang-Ku, SungNam City, KyungKi-Do 463-020 Korea
T 82.342.738.1114
F 82.342.714.9921


Novellus Systems Taiwan
5F-1, No. 295, Sec. 2
Kwang Fu Road
Hsin-Chu City, Taiwan 30801 R.O.C.
T 886.35.730550
F 886.35.730553


Novellus Systems Semiconductor
Equipment Shanghai Co., Ltd
603-611 No. 300
Tian-Lin Bldg., Tain-Lin Road
Shanghai 200233, China
T 86.21.6485.3889
F 86.21.6485.1282


Novellus Singapore Pte Ltd.
101 Thomson Road
#21-01/02 United Square
Singapore 307591
T 65.353.9288
F 65.353.6833


Novellus Systems Beijing
B1010 Floor 10 Building B
Wan Tone New World Plaza
2 Fuchengmenwaidajie,
Beijing, China 100037
T 86.10.68578698
F 86.10.68578697
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 42 (Thursday, March 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4715]



[[Page 9609]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OA09-22-000]


Florida Power & Light Company; Notice of Filing

February 26, 2009.
    Take notice that on February 17, 2009, Florida Power & Light 
Company submitted their methodology for distribution of revenues for 
operational penalties for unreserved use and operational penalties for 
late studies in compliance with Order Nos. 890 and 890-A. Preventing 
Undue Discrimination and Preference in Transmission Service, 118 FERC 
61, 119 (Order No. 890), Order on Rehearing, 121 FERC 61, 297 (Order 
890-A) (2007).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#581e1d0a1b17363431363d0b2d2828372a2c183e3d2a3b763f372e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ce888b9c8d81a0a2a7a0ab9dbbbebea1bcba8ea8abbcade0a9a1b8">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 10, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-4715 Filed 3-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 09-8381.

#### Michael Lynn Bradden, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

559 U.S. 994, 130 S. Ct. 1743,

176 L. Ed. 2d 217,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2317,

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
£A££ NO, D3-/S"- ODlOS- t\J

July ±1; line

6eur+ flf fot&uli

ID, £h>x US^7

ArnnM/TT ivr xkimLnhit.R

TD THE Ufill^ D^Pli£'.

X Affflllkrt*. Da;;All X Uutur. u.m \niLt**** -m Itf tons an ufi&ul

(.Ll& +0 eMb/tlDAlhis Kvi'n* DPP H& hi^&M undtt -the tola/ dP oPfrce

tLdtflvUS UtfC'l/uiU DP Jii'A LB»i>tituWo* hiltl fa/ ftl/ni <L;uj}»n/iuL'

LotoitllLUHs ia Vithh'e* isp \U Lkdlb\t&t Znfll-laKsJ UuJ LoftUfJ

Ri'iiu, a hi/ iva violuKa* of U* tiuil L'sku Act of )U9.

D&fftlJ X Uhrf&t

ZnmuPi- Mb, }1&'77L9

b.L BLtli U»;+

nil FM HbD

Uu*is\iUI& Tms 17393

Received'

JW-2 9 20J5

JWRDCOt/RTOF/iPpaie

c*
3UL2015 27

DUhJa U'/d

7«7)j-±wr Tat* **">*.

•ll'l'>|ltM>>>lll>'l

7B711254747
# TransportAzumah

Proposal For Essential Air Service To Owensboro KY

The TransportAzumah proposal ensures reliable access to the National Air Transportation System, which

is the primary goal of the Essential Air Service. The current air service yields a cost per passenger of

$1,312. At this number, Owensboro will lose its Essential Air Servic e eligibility. This proposal will require

OWB to agree to a waiver with regards to the equipment used. The equipment proposed is a 47

passenger bus.

Option 1: 4 round trips OWB

– BNA

OWB > BNA BNA > OWB

Lv OWB Ar BNA Lv BNA Ar OWB

500a 735a 900a 1135a

900a 1135a 100p 335p

100p 335p 500p 735p

500p 735p 900p 1135p

Option 2: 6 round trips OWB

– BNA

OWB > BNA BNA > OWB

Lv OWB Ar BNA Lv BNA Ar OWB

500a 735a 900a 1135a

800a 1035a 1200n 235p

1100a 135p 300p 535p

100p 335p 500p 735p

430p 705p 800p 1035p

730p 1005p 1100p 135a

Financial Projections OWB

- BNA

4 RT OWB

- BNA

6 RT

Direct Operating Cost $411,720 $617,580

Overhead $61,758 $92,637

Profit $23,673 $35,510

Total Cost $497,151 $745,727

Passengers 3,000 5,000

Revenue $120,000 $200,000

Subsidy $377,151 $545,727

Cost/Passenger $125.71 $109.15

Important information about these flights:

- All current aviation taxes and fees will be added to the proposed fare ($40 per passenger)

- We will operate a check

- in counter at both OWB and BNA

- It i s our plan to put these flights in one or more global distribution systems

- We will seek approval to have bags loaded directly onto the buses at BNA if feasible

- The vehicles will be equipped with wireless internet access

- All buses will be equipped with luggage compartments and bathroomsA picture of the style of bus to be used on this service:

Our service proposal cuts the subsidy rate from $1,068,773 to $545,727 and provides a substantially

more attractive option than the existing service. At 42 tri ps per week, OWB can recover a larger portion

of the traffic that it is leaking to other airports. Users will avoid the l ong layovers at the hub airport and

make the EAS airport cheaper and more convenient than driving to the hub.

Contact:

Joel Azumah

34 7

- 927

- 0750

jazumah@transportazumah.com
No. 08-1191.

#### Robert Morrison, et al., Petitioners v. National Australia Bank Ltd., et al.

559 U.S. 999, 130 S. Ct. 2060,

176 L. Ed. 2d 224,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2344.

March 19, 2010.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted. Justice Soto-mayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
**EXHIBIT
          32.1**
  **CERTIFICATION
          PURSUANT TO**
 **18
          U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
          ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
          906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
          connection with the Quarterly Report of United Companies Corporation (the
          “ Company ”)
          on
          Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the United
          States
          Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
          the
          undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
          certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
          906
          of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
  1.  The
          Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  2.  The
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
  Date:
                    May 12, 2006
                By:
                */s/*Robert M. CarmichaelName:
                Robert
                  M. CarmichaelTitle:
                Chief
                  Executive Officer
  A
          signed
          original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
          authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
          appears
          in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
          by Section 906, has been provided to United Companies Corporation and will
          be
          retained by United Companies Corporation and furnished to the United States
          Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.