# Electric Glass Melt Furnace

Emissions Test Report

Prepared for:



# Johns Manville International

Richmond Plant

814 Richmond Avenue

Richmond, Indiana 47374

Project No. 10-3990.07

January 20, 2011

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan 48220

(248) 548-8070

### Johns Manville International. BTEC Pro ject No. 10-3990.07

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 20, 2011 

## i Executive Summary

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulat ion Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA)

and its members to a voluntary collection of residu al risk-related data for the National Emission

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production 1 

## as well as for

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 2 

## . To assist in collecting the agreed upon data,

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retain ed by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates

of the following pollutants from the one exhaust st ack associated with the Electric Glass Melt

Furnace located at the Johns Manville International (Johns Manville) site in Richmond, Indiana:

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM 2.5 

## )

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, co balt, lead, manganese, nickel, and

selenium

• Mercury

• Hexavalent chromium

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride

Reference test methods used and test program method ologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and

NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. Table I on the following page summarizes the

overall results of the emissions test program.

1 

### Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD )

2 

### Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

### Johns Manville International. BTEC Pro ject No. 10-3990.07

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 20, 2011 

## ii Table I

Electric Glass Melt Furnace Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Test Date(s) Pollutant Emission

Rate

(lbs/hr) Emission Rate

(lbs/ton glass) Emission

Rate

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM 2.5 

## < 7.9 x 10 -3 

## < 3.9 x 10 -1



## Organic Condensible PM 2.5 

## 1.9 x 10 -2 

## 9.4 x 10 -1



## Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 

## 1.8 x 10 -2 

## 8.9 x 10 -1 

## November 16 & 17,

2010

Total PM 2.5 

## < 4.4 x 10 -2 

## < 2.2 x 10 0



## Filterable Particulate < 7.0 x 10 -3 

## < 4.1 x 10 -1



## Antimony < 3.3 x 10 -6 

## < 1.9 x 10 -4



## Arsenic < 3.3 x 10 -6 

## < 1.9 x 10 -4



## Beryllium < 8.4 x 10 -7 

## < 4.8 x 10 -5



## Cadmium < 9.6 x 10 -7 

## < 5.5 x 10 -5



## Chromium 7.3 x 10 -6 

## 4.4 x 10 -4



## Cobalt < 4.3 x 10 -6 

## < 2.4 x 10 -4



## Lead 2.3 x 10 -5 

## 1.3 x 10 -3



## Manganese 3.2 x 10 -5 

## 1.6 x 10 -3



## Nickel 1.8 x 10 -5 

## 9.9 x 10 -4 

## November 17 & 18,

2010

Selenium 1.8 x 10 -5 

## 9.9 x 10 -4



## November 16, 2010 Mercury 5.3 x 10 -5 

## 2.5 x 10 -3



## November 17 & 18,

2010 Hexavalent Chromium < 2.2 x 10 -6 

## < 1.2 x 10 -4



## Hydrogen Chloride < 2.5 x 10 -3 

## < 1.4 x 10 -1 

## November 16 & 17,

2010 Hydrogen Fluoride < 2.5 x 10 -3 

## < 1.4 x 10 -1



### Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of m g/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

### because exhaust from the

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

### ).

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the tab le indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the

sample fractions.

### Johns Manville International. BTEC Pro ject No. 10-3990.07

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 20, 2011 

## i TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................

................................................... ..................... 1

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ................................

................................................... ............ 2

2.1 P ROCESS 

## M ONITORING



## ................................................... ................................................... . 2

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES.............. ................................ 2

3.1 E XHAUST 

## G AS 

## V ELOCITY



## , M OLECULAR 

## W EIGHT



## , AND 

## M OISTURE 

## C ONTENT 

## .................... 2

3.2 PM AND 

## PM 2.5 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES



## ................................................... 3

3.3 T OTAL 

## S ELECTED 

## M ETALS 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ................................ 3

3.4 H G 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES



## ................................................... .................. 4

3.5 H EXAVALENT 

## C HROMIUM 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ................................. 4

3.6 HF AND 

## HC L 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES



## ................................................... .. 4

4.0 TEST RESULTS .......................................

................................................... ....................... 5

TABLES

Table 1 – Test Personnel

Table 2 – Electric Glass Melt Furnace Emissions Tes t Program Summary

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram

Figure 2 – Method 3A Sampling Train Schematic Drawi ng

Figure 3 – OTM 27/OTM 28 Sampling Train Schematic D rawing

Figure 4 – Method 29 Sampling Train Schematic Drawi ng

Figure 5 – Method 30B Sampling Train Schematic Draw ing

Figure 6 – Method 0061 Sampling Train Schematic Dra wing

Figure 7 – Method 26A Sampling Train Schematic Draw ing

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Detailed Test Run Results

Appendix B – Process Data

Appendix C – Field and Computer-Generated Data Shee ts and Notes

Appendix D – Equipment Calibration Documents

Appendix E – Laboratory Analytical Reports

### Johns Manville International. BTEC Pro ject No. 10-3990.07

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 20, 2011 1 

## 1.0 Introduction

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulat ion Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA)

and its members to a voluntary collection of residu al risk-related data for the National Emission

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production 3 

## as well as for

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 4 

## . To assist in collecting the agreed upon data,

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retain ed by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates

of the following pollutants from the one exhaust st ack associated with the Electric Glass Melt

Furnace located at the Johns Manville International (Johns Manville) site in Richmond, Indiana:

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM 2.5 

## )

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, co balt, lead, manganese, nickel, and

selenium

• Mercury

• Hexavalent chromium

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride

Reference test methods used and test program method ologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and

NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. The emissions test program was conducted on

November 16, 17, and 18, 2010. The test program co nsisted of triplicate emission tests at each

location for each parameter. The field sampling po rtion of the emissions test program included

the personnel summarized by Table 1.

Table 1

Emissions Test Program Personnel

Personnel Affiliation

Jim Sharp BTEC

Paul Molenda BTEC

Matthew Young BTEC

Dan Stevens Johns Manville

3 

### Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD )

4 

### Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

### Johns Manville International. BTEC Pro ject No. 10-3990.07

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 20, 2011 2 

## 2.0 Process Description

Glass raw materials and cullet are fed to the elect ric melter. Molten glass then flows to the

fiberizers where fiberglass is made. The material is collected, shredded, and packaged for sale.

2.1 Process Monitoring

During the emissions test program, the electric mel t furnaces were operated under normal

conditions. In addition to production rate during each test run, process operating data recorded

during the emissions test program included (1) furn ace temperature, (2) raw material feed rates,

and (3) baghouse pressure drop. Process production data is available in Appendix B. Control

equipment data will be available to U.S. EPA on req uest.

3.0 Sampling and Analytical Methodologies

Sampling and analytical methodologies for the emiss ions test program can be separated into six

categories as follows:

(1) Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weig ht, and moisture content;

(2) Measurement of exhaust gas PM and PM 2.5 

## concentrations and emission rates;

(3) Measurement of exhaust gas total selected metals co ncentrations and emission rates;

(4) Measurement of exhaust gas Hg concentrations and em ission rates;

(5) Measurement of exhaust gas hexavalent chromium conc entrations and emission rates;

and,

(6) Measurement of exhaust gas HF and HCl concentration s and emission rates.

Descriptions of sampling and analytical methodologi es by category are summarized by Sections

3.1 through 3.6, respectively.

3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity, Molecular Weight, and Moistur e Content

Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weig ht, and moisture content was conducted

using the following reference test methods codified at Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code

of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 60, Appendix A):

• Method 1 - “Location of the Sampling Site and Sampling Points”

• Method 2 - “Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flowrate”

• Method 3A - “Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concent rations in

Emissions from Stationary Sources”(Instrumental Ana lyzer Procedure)

• Method 4 - “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases”

These test methods were used to evaluate exhaust ga s flowrates either in conjunction with the

isokinetic sampling methodologies used to evaluate some pollutant emission rates or as separate,

discrete measurements conducted in support of the n on-isokinetic sampling methodologies.

### Johns Manville International. BTEC Pro ject No. 10-3990.07

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 20, 2011 3 

## Stack gas velocity traverses were conducted in acco rdance with the procedures outlined in

Method 1 and Method 2 (see Figure 1 for a traverse location drawing). An S-type pitot tube with

a thermocouple assembly, calibrated in accordance w ith Method 2, Section 4.1.1, was used to

measure exhaust gas velocity pressures (using a man ometer) and temperatures at each location

during testing. The S-type pitot tube dimensions w ere within specified limits, therefore, a

baseline pitot tube coefficient of 0.84 (dimensionl ess) were assigned.

Molecular weight was determined according to USEPA Method 3A. The O 2 

## content of the

exhaust gas was measured using a M&C Products PMA 1 00-L O 2 

## gas analyzer (or equivalent)

and the CO 2 

## content of the exhaust gas was measured using a Ca lifornia Analytical Instruments

(CAI0 600 Series CO 2 

## gas analyzer (or equivalent). An integrated sampl e of the gas stream was

drawn through an insulated stainless-steel probe wi th an in-line glass fiber filter to remove any

particulate and into a tedlar sample bag utilizing an evacuated sample lung. At the completion of

each test the gas sample was introduced to the anal yzers. Data was recorded at 4-second

intervals on a PC equipped with data acquisition so ftware. A schematic drawing of the emission

monitoring system is provided as Figure 2.

Exhaust gas moisture content was evaluated using Me thod 4. Exhaust gas moisture content was

be determined volumetrically (liquid impingers) and gravimetrically (silica gel impinger).

3.2 PM and PM 2.5 

## Concentrations and Emission Rates

PM/PM 2.5 

## concentrations and emission rates were measured us ing U.S. EPA Other Test

Methods (OTM) 27 and OTM 28. PM, PM 2.5 

## , and CPM concentrations and emission rates were

measured using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling syste m. This

system consisted of (1) a tapered nozzle, (2) a PM 10 

## particle sizer cyclone followed by a PM 2.5 

## particle sizer cyclone, (3) a glass or quartz fiber filter assembly and heated probe, (4) a glass

recirculating ice water condenser system, (5) a set of four GS impingers, (6) a length of sample

line, and (7) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated

orifice. Prior to each test, the second and third impingers were filled with 100 ml of HPLC

water, the first and fourth impingers were empty, a nd the fifth impinger contained

approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A sch ematic drawing of the PM 2.5 

## /CPM sample

train is provided as Figure 3. The total filterabl e PM fraction was collected on the front half of

the M29 Metals sampling train as per the QAPP.

3.3 

## Total Selected Metals Concentrations and Emission R ates

Total selected metals concentrations and emission r ates were measured using the procedures of

40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 29. Selected metals concentrations and emission rates were

measured using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling syste m. This

system consisted of (1) a borosilicate glass or qua rtz nozzle, (2) a steel probe w/glass liner, (3) a

heated quartz fiber filter assembly, (4) a set of s ix GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line,

and (6) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice.

Prior to each test, the first two impingers were fi lled with 100 ml of a 5% nitric acid

(HNO 3 

## )/10% hydrogen peroxide solution, the third impinge r was empty, and the fourth

### Johns Manville International. BTEC Pro ject No. 10-3990.07

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 20, 2011 4 

## contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desicca nt. A schematic drawing of the metals

sampling train is provided as Figure 4.

3.4 Hg Concentrations and Emission Rates

Hg concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 40 CFR 60,

Appendix A, Method 30B and using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack

sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a so rbent trap, (2) a steel probe, (3) Teflon

tubing, (4) three GS impingers, (5) a length of sam ple line, and (6) a Nutech ® control case

equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. The first impinger was left empty

as a water knockout, and the remaining two impinger s contained approximately 300 g of silica

gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Hg sampl ing train is provided as Figure 5.

3.5 Hexavalent Chromium Concentrations and Emission Rat es

Hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rat es were measured using the procedures of

Method 0061 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM-98.01. He xavalent chromium concentrations and

emission rates were measured using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack

sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a gl ass nozzle, (2) a heated steel probe with a

glass probe liner, (4) a Teflon tee with a recircul ating pump, (5) five GS impingers, (6) a length

of sample line, and (7) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and a

calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first impinger was filled with 150 mL of 0.1N KOH, the

next two were filled with 75 mL of 0.1 N KOH, the f ourth was empty, and the last impinger

contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desicca nt. A schematic drawing of the Method 0061

sampling train is provided as Figure 6.

3.6 HF and HCl Concentrations and Emission Rates

Measurement of hydrogen halide concentrations and e mission rates were conducted using the

procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 26A. T he Method 26A sampling train consisted

of: (1) a heated borosilicate or quartz probe liner ; (2) a heated borosilicate or quartz glass filter

holder containing a pre-weighed 110-mm diameter was hed quartz filter with Teflon filter

support; (3) a set of three Greensburg-Smith (GS) i mpingers each containing 100 ml of 0.1

Normal Sulfuric Acid (0.1 N H 2 

## SO 4 

## ), (4) a modified GS impinger containing a known we ight of

silica gel desiccant; (5) a length of sample line, and (7) a Nutech control case equipped with a

pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Figur e 7 provides an illustration of the Method 26A

sample train.

### Johns Manville International. BTEC Pro ject No. 10-3990.07

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 20, 2011 5 

## 4.0 Test Results

The overall results of the emissions test program a re summarized by Table 2.

Table 2

Electric Glass Melt Furnace Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Test Date(s) Pollutant Emission

Rate

(lbs/hr) Emission Rate

(lbs/ton glass) Emission

Rate

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM 2.5 

## < 7.9 x 10 -3 

## < 3.9 x 10 -1



## Organic Condensible PM 2.5 

## 1.9 x 10 -2 

## 9.4 x 10 -1



## Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 

## 1.8 x 10 -2 

## 8.9 x 10 -1 

## November 16 & 17,

2010

Total PM 2.5 

## < 4.4 x 10 -2 

## < 2.2 x 10 0



## Filterable Particulate < 7.0 x 10 -3 

## < 4.1 x 10 -1



## Antimony < 3.3 x 10 -6 

## < 1.9 x 10 -4



## Arsenic < 3.3 x 10 -6 

## < 1.9 x 10 -4



## Beryllium < 8.4 x 10 -7 

## < 4.8 x 10 -5



## Cadmium < 9.6 x 10 -7 

## < 5.5 x 10 -5



## Chromium 7.3 x 10 -6 

## 4.4 x 10 -4



## Cobalt < 4.3 x 10 -6 

## < 2.4 x 10 -4



## Lead 2.3 x 10 -5 

## 1.3 x 10 -3



## Manganese 3.2 x 10 -5 

## 1.6 x 10 -3



## Nickel 1.8 x 10 -5 

## 9.9 x 10 -4 

## November 17 & 18,

2010

Selenium 1.8 x 10 -5 

## 9.9 x 10 -4



## November 16, 2010 Mercury 5.3 x 10 -5 

## 2.5 x 10 -3



## November 17 & 18

, 2010 Hexavalent Chromium < 2.2 x 10 -6 

## < 1.2 x 10 -4



## Hydrogen Chloride < 2.5 x 10 -3 

## < 1.4 x 10 -1 

## November 16 & 17,

2010 Hydrogen Fluoride < 2.5 x 10 -3 

## < 1.4 x 10 -1



### Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of m g/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

### because exhaust from the

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

### ).

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the tab le indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the

sample fractions.



## Detailed results for individual emission test runs are summarized in Appendix A. Process data

associated with the emissions test program is provi ded in Appendix B. Field and computergenerated data sheets are included in Appendix C. Appendix D includes calibration documents

and Appendix E includes laboratory analytical repor ts.

### Johns Manville International. BTEC Pro ject No. 10-3990.07

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 20, 2011 6 

## Limitations

The information and opinions rendered in this repor t are exclusively for use by NAIMA and/or

Johns Manville International. BTEC will not distri bute or publish this report without NAIMA’s

consent except as required by law or court order. BTEC accepts responsibility for the competent

performance of its duties in executing the assignme nt and preparing reports in accordance with

the normal standards of the profession, but disclai ms any responsibility for consequential

damages.

This report was prepared by:

Brandon V. Chase

Staff Environmental Engineer

This report was reviewed by:

Randal J. Tysar

Senior Environmental Engineer

# Figures

### diameter = 24"

Points Distance "

12 0.5

11 1.6

10 2.8

9 4.2

8 6.0

7 8.5

6 15.5

5 18.0

4 19.8

3 21.2

2 22.4

1 23.5



## Figure 1

Site:

Johns Manville

Richmond, Indiana

Electric Melt Furnace BT Environmental Consulting,

Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan N ot to Scale <0.5 diameters

<2 diameters

### Bags Samples

to analyzers



## Figure 2

Site:

USEPA Method 3 A

Johns Manville

Richmond, Indiana

Electric Melt Furnace BT Environmental Consulting,

Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan Data Acquisition System



### Calibration Gases

(Fed to Probe Tip) Environics Gas

Dilution System M&C Model 100-L

O 2 

### Analyzer CAI Series 600

CO 2 

### Analyzer pump tedlar

bagFigure 3Site:USEPA OTM27/28Johns ManvilleRichmond, IndianaElectric Melt FurnaceBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 Wolcott Ferndale,MichiganPumpSilica gelHeated Filter BoxS-Type Pitot w/ ThermocoupleHeated Probe w/ Glass Liner & NozzleMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 545mm Filter HousingFilter Holder W/ Teflon FilterVerticle CondenserPot Belly Impinger100 mL DI H2OFigure 4Site:USEPA Method 29Johns ManvilleRichmond, IndianaElectric Melt FurnaceBT Environmental Consulting Inc.2615 Wolcott FerndaleMichigan 48220PumpSilica gel100 mL 5% HNO3 / 10% H2O2 solutionHeated Filter BoxS-Type Pitot w/ ThermocoupleHeated Probe w/ Glass Liner & NozzleMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Figure 5Site:USEPA Method 30B Sampling TrainJohns ManvilleRichmond, IndianaElectric Melt FurnaceBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, Michigan 48220Knock outPumpTemperature sensorMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Sample LineDessicantMercuryTrapProbeFigure 6Site:USEPA Method 0061Johns ManvilleRichmond, IndianaElectric Melt FurnaceBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, MichiganPumpMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5150 mL 0.1 N KOHEmptySilica GelPerastaltic pumpTeflon tee75 mL 0.1 N KOHEmptyFigure 7Site:USEPA Method 26A Sampling TrainJohns ManvilleRichmond, IndianaElectric Melt FurnaceBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 Wolcott Ferndale,MichiganPumpHeated Filter BoxS-type pitot w/ thermocoupleHeated probe with glass linerMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Empty100 mL 0.1N H2SO4Silica Gel

# APPENDIX A

DETAILED TEST RUN RESULTS

### Plant Job #

Location OTM27/OTM 28 Testing

**Copyright by Walter Smith**

**Run Number** 1 2 3 Average

**Date Test Date** 11/16/2010 11/16/2010 11/17/2010

**Start Run Start Time** 7:21:00 11:55:00 7:43:00

**Run Finish Time** 14:20:00 16:06:00 11:21:00

**Net Traversing Points** 12 12 12



### Θ **Net Run Time, minutes** 240.96 237.81 212.84 231



### D N **Nozzle Diameter, inches** 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200



### C

p **Pitot Tube Coeficient** 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84



### Y **Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor** 1.003 1.003 1.003 1.003



### P Br **Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury** 29.80 29.80 29.90 29.83



### ∆ H **Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2**  **O** 0.44 0.43 0.40 0.43



### V

m **Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet** 89.980 87.820 73.270 83.690



### t

m **Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F** 66.96 73.25 67.00 69.07



### V mstd **Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf** 90.163 86.960 73.653 83.592



### V lc **Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml** 92.0 144 168.0 134.7



### V wstd **Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet** 4.33 6.78 7.91 6.34



### % H 2 

### O **Moisture Content of Stack Gas, %** 4.6 7.2 9.7 7.2



### M fd **Dry Mole Fraction** 0.954 0.928 0.903 0.928



### %CO 2 **Carbon Dioxide, %** 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.6



### %O 2 **Oxygen, %** 19.9 20 20.3 20.1



### % CO+ N 2 **Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, %** 79.3 79.4 79.3 79.3



### M d **Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole** 28.92 28.90 28.88 28.90



### M

s **Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole** 28.42 28.11 27.82 28.12



### P

g **Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2**  **O** -0.3 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3



### P

s **Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury** 29.78 29.78 29.88 29.81



### t

s **Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F** 199 189 185 191



### ∆ P

avg **Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2**  **O** 0.395 0.385 0.308 0.363



### v

s **Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second** 39.8 39.2 35.1 38.0



### A

s **Stack Crossectional Area, square feet** 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1



### Q sd **Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm** 5,708 5,549

4,881

5,380



### Q

aw **Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm** 7,498 7,385

6,615

7,166



### %I **Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, %** 94.5 94.9 102.2 97.2



### W

p **Production, tons glass per hour**



### W **Filterable PM 2.5**  **Catch Weight, mg** 1.2 0.8 0.8 0.9



### C mg/dscm **Filterable PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm** 4.6E-01 3.2E-01 3.8E-01 3.9E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 **Filterable PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2**  N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr **Filterable PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/hr** 9.9E-03 6.8E-03 7.0E-03 7.9E-03



### E lb/ton product **Filterable PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/ton product**



### W **Organic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Catch Weight, mg** 1.8 1.9 2.8 2.2



### C mg/dscm **Organic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm** 7.0E-01 7.7E-01 1.3E+00 9.4E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 **Organic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2**  N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr **Organic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/hr** 1.5E-02 1.6E-02 2.5E-02 1.9E-02



### E lb/ton product **Organic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/ton product**



### W **Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Catch Weight, mg** 1.9 2.4 2.0 2.1



### C mg/dscm **Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm** 7.4E-01 9.7E-01 9.6E-01 8.9E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 **Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2**  N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr **Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/hr** 1.6E-02 2.0E-02 1.8E-02 1.8E-02



### E lb/ton product **Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/ton product**



### W **Total PM 2.5**  **Catch Weight, mg** 4.9 5.1 5.6 5.2



### C mg/dscm **Total PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm** 1.9E+00 2.1E+00 2.7E+00 2.2E+00



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 **Total PM 2.5**  **Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2**  N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr **Total PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/hr** 4.1E-02 4.3E-02 4.9E-02 4.4E-02



### E lb/ton product **Total PM 2.5**  **Emission Rate, pounds/ton product** 

### 10-3990.07

Johns Manville

Richmond, IN EMF Source

MY PersonnelPlant Job #

Location Method 29 Metals

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 11/17/2010 11/18/2010 11/18/2010

Start Run Start Time 11:58:00 7:23:00 10:58:00

Run Finish Time 15:15:00 10:39:00 14:14:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 192 192 192 192

D N Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.310 0.310 0.310 0.310

C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.003 1.003 1.003 1.003

P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.02 30.20 30.20 30.14

∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.55 2.54 1.75 1.95

V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 133.430 170.170 142.520 148.707

t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 81.43 74.04 83.30 79.59

V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 131.444 171.380 140.821 147.882

V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 225 225 215 221.7

V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 10.59 10.59 10.12 10.43

% H 2 O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 7.5 5.8 6.7 6.7

M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.925 0.942 0.933 0.933

%CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.4 0.8 0.1 0.4

%O 2 Oxygen, % 20.3 19.9 20.5 20.2

% CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.3 79.3 79.4 79.3

M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.88 28.92 28.84 28.88

M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.07 28.29 28.11 28.15

P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.3 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3

P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.00 30.18 30.18 30.12

t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 185 183 185 184

∆ P

avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.212 0.357 0.240 0.270

v

s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 28.8 37.2 30.6 32.2

A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1

Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 4,122 5,465

4,444

4,677

Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 5,424 7,007

5,765

6,065

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 99.7 98.1 99.0 98.9

W

p Production, tons glass per hour

W Particulate Method 5 Catch Weight, mg 1.9 1.2 1.9 1.7

C mg/dscm Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm 5.1E-01 2.5E-01 4.8E-01 4.1E-01

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/hr 7.9E-03 5.1E-03 7.9E-03 7.0E-03

E lb/ton product Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Antimony Catch Weight, μg 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8

C mg/dscm Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm 2.1E-04 1.6E-04 2.0E-04 1.9E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.3E-06 3.4E-06 3.3E-06 3.3E-06

E lb/ton product Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Arsenic Catch Weight, μg 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8

C mg/dscm Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm 2.1E-04 1.6E-04 2.0E-04 1.9E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.3E-06 3.4E-06 3.3E-06 3.3E-06

E lb/ton product Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Beryllium Catch Weight, μg 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

C mg/dscm Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm 5.4E-05 4.1E-05 5.0E-05 4.8E-05

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 8.3E-07 8.4E-07 8.3E-07 8.4E-07

E lb/ton product Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cadmium Catch Weight, μg 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2

C mg/dscm Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm 5.4E-05 6.0E-05 5.0E-05 5.5E-05

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 8.3E-07 1.2E-06 8.3E-07 9.6E-07

E lb/ton product Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Chromium Catch Weight, μg 2.9 1.5 0.9 1.8

C mg/dscm Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 7.7E-04 3.1E-04 2.2E-04 4.4E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.2E-05 6.4E-06 3.7E-06 7.3E-06

E lb/ton product Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cobalt Catch Weight, μg 1.1 1.8 0.2 1.0

C mg/dscm Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm 2.8E-04 3.7E-04 5.0E-05 2.4E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.4E-06 7.6E-06 8.3E-07 4.3E-06

E lb/ton product Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Lead Catch Weight, μg 5.6 10.4 0.6 5.5

C mg/dscm Lead Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E-03 2.1E-03 1.4E-04 1.3E-03

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Lead Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Lead Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.3E-05 4.4E-05 2.3E-06 2.3E-05

E lb/ton product Lead Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Manganese Catch Weight, μg 3.1 17.9 1.5 7.5

C mg/dscm Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm 8.3E-04 3.7E-03 3.8E-04 1.6E-03

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.3E-05 7.5E-05 6.3E-06 3.2E-05

E lb/ton product Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Nickel Catch Weight, μg 4.1 6.2 2.3 4.2

C mg/dscm Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm 1.1E-03 1.3E-03 5.8E-04 9.9E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.7E-05 2.6E-05 9.6E-06 1.8E-05

E lb/ton product Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Selenium Catch Weight, μg 2.2 5.4 5.0 4.2

C mg/dscm Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm 5.9E-04 1.1E-03 1.3E-03 9.9E-04

C mg/dscm@7%O2 Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/hr Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 9.1E-06 2.3E-05 2.1E-05 1.8E-05

E lb/ton product Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 10-3990.07

JM

Richmond EMF Source

PM PersonnelM30B Mercury TestingCompany NamePlant Location CityPlant Location StateSource NameSource ID**Johns Maville Richmond Indiana Electric Glass Melt Furnace S166 Please note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "S"** Measured Value(mg/dscm)CorrectedConcentration(mg/dscm at 7% O2)Basis (Wet or Dry)Test Method Used(EPA Method 30B)Data Flag (ADL,BDL, DDL)Test MethodCommentsCalculatedEmission Rate(lb/hr)**1 11/16/2010 7:32 11/16/2010 9:32 2.47E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B ADL 5.28E-05** **2 11/16/2010 9:44 11/16/2010 11:44 2.55E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B ADL 5.45E-05** **3 11/16/2010 14:00 11/16/2010 16:00 2.51E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B ADL 5.21E-05** Test End TimeRun Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateTotal Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test Results**Page 1 of 3 1/19/2011** M30B Mercury TestingQA/QC DocumentationProcessProduction Rate(tons glass/hr)CalculatedEmission Rate(lb/ton)Trap IDSection 1Mass (ng)Section 2Mass (ng)TotalMass (ng)InitialSpike(ng)Total Non-Spike (ng)SampleVolume(dscm)VolumeDifference (%)Volume Diff.LimitBreaktrough(%)BreaktroughLimit**4.6 0.8 19.9 7498 5708 199 Stack information is from OTM** **27/28 Run 1 R1, A 379 0.59 379.59 0 379.59 0.15 0% 0** **4.6 0.8 19.9 7498 5708 199 Stack information is from OTM** **27/28 Run 1 R2, A 381 0 381 0 381 0.15 0% 0** **7.2 0.6 20 7385 5549 189 Stack information is from OTM** **27/28 Run 2 R3, A 372 0.82 372.82 0 372.82 0.15 0% 0** Flue GasTemperature (F)Other Supporting InformationFlue GasMoisture(%)Flue GasO2(%)Flue GasCO2(%)Flue Gas FlowRate (dscfm)Flue GasFlow Rate(acfm)Trap #1≤**20% of field recovery test** ≤**10% of Section 1 Hg mass for** **Hg conc. >1**μ**g/dscm: or**≤**20% of Section 1 for Hg conc.** **≤1 μg/dscm** **Page 2 of 3 1/19/2011** M30B Mercury TestingConcentration(μg/dscm)Trap IDSection 1MassSection 2MassTotalMassInitialSpikeTotal Non-SpikeSampleVolumeVolumeDifference (%)Volume Diff.LimitBreaktrough (%)BreaktroughLimitConcentration(μg/dscm)Abs. diff. RD (%) LimitCrecR (%) by RunRavg(%)Limit**2.47 R1, B 403.0 0.83 403.83 20 383.83 0.15 0% 0.2** **2.5 0.0 0** **0.1525 117 2.55** **R2, B 406.0 1.10 407.10 20 387.1 0.15 0% 0.3 2.6** **0.0 1 0.1647 124** **2.51 R3, B 399.0 0.65 399.65 20 379.65 0.15 0% 0.2** **2.5 0.0 1** **0.1729 129 123** **Average Recovery,** **between 85 and 115%** Trap #2Paired Trap Agreement (RD) Measured Spike Recovery ( R )≤**20% of field recovery test** ≤**10% of Section 1 Hg mass for Hg** **conc. >1**μ**g/dscm: or**≤**20% of Section 1 for Hg conc.≤1** **μg/dscm**≥**10 % RD mass for Hg conc. >1** **μg/dscm: or**≤**20% RD or**≤**0.2 μg/dscm abs.diff.** **for Hg conc.**≤1**μg/dscm Page 3 of 3** **1/19/2011**

## Plant Job #

Location Hex Chrome Testing

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 11/17/2010 11/18/2010 11/18/2010

Start Run Start Time 11:58:00 7:23:00 10:58:00

Run Finish Time 15:15:00 10:39:00 14:14:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 192 192 192 192



### D N Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.310 0.310 0.310 0.310



### C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.994 0.994 0.994 0.994



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.02 30.20 30.20 30.14



### ∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.73 2.43 1.89 2.02



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 146.080 173.140 153.550 157.590



### t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 74.56 70.19 79.23 74.66



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 144.508 174.020 151.543 156.691



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 260 226 237 241.0



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 12.24 10.64 11.16 11.34



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 7.8 5.8 6.9 6.8



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.922 0.942 0.931 0.932



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.4 0.8 0.1 0.4



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 20.3 19.9 20.5 20.2



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.3 79.3 79.4 79.3



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.88 28.92 28.84 28.88



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.03 28.29 28.09 28.14



### P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.3 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 30.00 30.18 30.18 30.12



### t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 185 184 184 184



### ∆ P

avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.256 0.368 0.277 0.300



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 31.8 37.8 32.8 34.1



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 4,528 5,550

4,763

4,947



### Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 5,985 7,122

6,185

6,431



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 99.7 98.0 99.4 99.1



### W

p Production, tons glass per hour



### W Hexavalent Chromium Catch Weight, μg 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.5



### C mg/dscm Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 2.0E-04 8.1E-05 9.3E-05 1.2E-04



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.3E-06 1.7E-06 1.7E-06 2.2E-06



### E lb/ton product Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.07

JM

Richmond EMF Source

MY Personnel

## Plant Job #

Location HCl and HF Testing

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 11/16/2010 11/17/2010 11/17/2010

Start Run Start Time 15:36:00 7:02:00 8:35:00

Run Finish Time 17:43:00 8:15:00 10:06:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 64 64 64 64



### D N Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.310 0.310 0.310 0.310



### C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.994 0.994 0.994 0.994



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.80 29.90 29.90 29.87



### ∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.65 1.96 1.95 1.85



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 46.570 51.120 51.500 49.730



### t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 58.81 56.31 68.38 61.17



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 47.112 52.180 51.365 50.219



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 85 82 75 80.7



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 4.00 3.86 3.53 3.80



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 7.8 6.9 6.4 7.0



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.922 0.931 0.936 0.930



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.5



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 20.0 20.3 20.3 20.2



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.4 79.3 79.3 79.3



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.90 28.88 28.88 28.88



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.04 28.13 28.18 28.12



### P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.27 -0.27 -0.27 -0.27



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.78 29.88 29.88 29.85



### t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 185 185 184 185



### ∆ P

avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.248 0.303 0.292 0.281



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 31.2 34.5 33.9 33.2



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 4,414 4,951

4,896

4,754



### Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 5,877 6,508

6,390

6,258



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.0 98.8 98.3 99.0



### W

p Production, tons glass per hour



### W HCl Catch Weight, μg 200 200 200 200



### C mg/dscm HCl Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E-01 1.4E-01 1.4E-01 1.4E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 HCl Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr HCl Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.5E-03 2.5E-03 2.5E-03 2.5E-03



### E lb/ton product HCl Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W HF Catch Weight, μg 200 200 200 200



### C mg/dscm HF Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E-01 1.4E-01 1.4E-01 1.4E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 HF Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr HF Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.5E-03 2.5E-03 2.5E-03 2.5E-03



### E lb/ton product HF Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.07

JM

Richmond EMF Source

PM Personnel

# APPENDIX B

PROCESS DATA

# APPENDIX C

FIELD AND COMPUTER-GENERATED DATA

SHEETSBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.07 Probe #3ft ptc PollutantHCL Points/Port8StartFinish Pre PostCompanyJM DGM #MB4 Method26A Total Points16.001@15".00@7"LocationRichmondRate (cfm)0.75 Run #1 Time/pt (min) 4.0SourceEMF Delta∆H@1.71 Date16-Nov-10 Time/reading 4.0OperatorPMBws (%)7.83 # of Ports2 Total Run64.0Filter NumberCondensate Volume 73Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.78Barometric29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain 12DGM Y0.994Pm (in Hg)29.80Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.27Actual Dn (in)0.31O2 (%)20 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2)0.00052CO2 (%)0.6Md28.90Stack Area (sf)3.14Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.04Act. Flow (cfm)5,877Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnPreliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)48.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)4,789Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)4,414Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.80.0 4.0 15:3652.82 0.36 182 59 592.382.47 260 260 59 374.0 8.0 15:4056.38 0.36 182 58 602.382.47 260 260 59 368.0 12.0 15:4860.16 0.34 181 61 602.252.34 260 260 59 3512.0 16.0 16:4363.46 0.21 187 58 571.391.39 260 260 59 3416.0 20.0 16:4766.29 0.20 186 56 561.321.32 260 260 57 3320.0 24.0 16:5169.08 0.25 186 57 561.651.65 260 260 55 3224.028.016:5571.950.25 18658561.651.65 260 260 56 3128.0 32.0 17:0674.75 0.28 186 59 561.851.84 260 260 55 3832.0 36.0 17:1177.84 0.27 186 58 561.791.78 260 260 55 3736.0 40.0 17:1580.93 0.25 186 62 561.651.64 260 260 59 3640.0 44.0 17:1983.82 0.24 187 63 571.591.58 260 260 59 3544.0 48.0 17:2386.65 0.20 188 63 571.321.32 260 260 61 3448.0 52.0 17:2789.29 0.20 188 63 571.321.32 260 260 61 3352.0 56.0 17:3191.91 0.19 188 64 571.261.25 260 260 61 3256.0 60.0 17:3594.38 0.19 180 64 571.261.25 260 260 63 3160.0 64.0 17:3996.95 0.17 180 64 581.121.12 260 260 65 364.0 17:4399.39Average:46.57 0.25 184.9 60.4 57.21.641.65 260 260 58.9375 3Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.07 Probe #3FT PTC PollutantHCL Points/Port8StartFinish Pre PostCompanyJM DGM #MB4 Method26A Total Points16LocationRichmondRate (cfm)0.75 Run #2 Time/pt (min) 4.0SourceEMF Delta∆H@1.71 Date17-Nov-10 Time/reading 4.0OperatorMYBws (%)6.9 # of Ports2 Total Run64.0Filter NumberCondensate Volume 69Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.88Barometric29.90 Silica Gel Weight Gain 13DGM Y0.994Pm (in Hg)29.90Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.27Actual Dn (in)0.31O2 (%)20.3Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2)0.00052CO2 (%)0.4Md28.88Stack Area (sf)3.14Est.DH(in H2O)Ms28.13Act. Flow (cfm)6,508Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnPreliminary dP (in H20)Total Vol.(cf)48.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)5,317Preliminary Ts (oF)Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)4,951Preliminary Tm (oF)Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.80.04.07:0299.590.30 18447472.001.94 26026043274.08.07:06102.730.31 18447472.072.00 26026042268.012.07:10105.960.29 18448471.941.87 260260412512.016.07:14109.050.30 18653482.001.94 260260402416.020.07:18112.200.26 18755491.741.68 260260412320.024.07:22115.100.26 18658501.741.68 260260412224.028.07:26118.100.28 18660511.871.81 260260422128.032.07:30121.070.29 18662521.941.88 260260422832.036.07:43124.250.39 18661542.612.53 260260433736.040.07:47127.910.38 18563552.542.47 260260423640.044.07:51131.490.37 18566562.472.41 260260413544.048.07:55135.050.35 18566562.342.28 260260413448.052.07:59138.480.27 18667571.801.76 260260423352.056.08:03141.550.27 18568581.801.77 260260433256.060.08:07144.590.25 18468581.671.64 260260433160.064.08:11147.620.27 18769591.801.77 26026043364.08:15150.71Average:51.120.30 185.4 59.952.82.021.96 260.0 260.0 41.93Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.07 Probe #3FT PTC PollutantHCL Points/Port8StartFinish Pre PostCompanyJM DGM #MB4 Method26A Total Points16.005@15" .001@7"LocationRichmondRate (cfm)0.75 Run #3 Time/pt (min) 4.0SourceEMF Delta∆H@1.71 Date17-Nov-10 Time/reading 4.0OperatorMYBws (%)6.4 # of Ports2 Total Run64.0Filter NumberCondensate Volume 66Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.88Barometric29.90 Silica Gel Weight Gain 9DGM Y0.994Pm (in Hg)30.12Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.27Actual Dn (in)0.31O2 (%)20.3Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2)0.00052CO2 (%)0.4Md28.88Stack Area (sf)3.14Est.DH(in H2O)3.00Ms28.18Act. Flow (cfm)6,390Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnPreliminary dP (in H20)0.36Total Vol.(cf)48.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)5,232Preliminary Ts (oF)125Est. Us (ft/s)35.9Dry Ref Flow (cfm)4,896Preliminary Tm (oF)85Theor Dn (in)0.2705 Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.80.0 4.0 8:35152.08 0.34 187 63 602.352.25 260 260 45 374.0 8.0 8:39155.52 0.36 184 66 612.492.39 260 260 42 368.0 12.0 8:43159.08 0.32 185 67 612.212.12 260 260 42 3512.0 16.0 8:47162.45 0.30 185 69 622.071.99 260 260 42 3416.0 20.0 8:51165.68 0.27 185 71 621.871.8 260 260 42 3320.0 24.0 8:55168.77 0.27 184 72 631.871.8 260 260 44 3224.0 28.0 8:59171.84 0.27 182 72 631.871.8 260 260 44 3128.0 32.0 9:07174.93 0.28 182 73 641.931.87 260 260 44 3832.0 36.0 9:34178.04 0.29 183 67 672.001.94 260 260 44 3736.0 40.0 9:38181.21 0.28 184 71 671.931.87 260 260 45 3640.0 44.0 9:42184.39 0.27 184 73 671.871.81 260 260 43 3544.0 48.0 9:46187.51 0.27 184 76 681.871.81 260 260 43 3448.0 52.0 9:50190.63 0.29 184 77 682.001.94 260 260 44 3352.056.09:54193.860.30 18572692.072.01 260260453256.060.09:58197.140.28 18379691.931.88 260260463160.064.010:02200.360.28 18279701.931.88 26026046364.010:06203.58Average:51.500.29 183.9 71.765.12.021.95 260.0 260.0 43.8125 3.0Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # 3 ft A Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port 6Start Finish Pre PostCompany Johns Manville DGM # MB-3 Method OTM27/28 Total Points120.002 0.002 @15" @12"Location Richmond, INRate (cfm)0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 20.1Source EMF Delta∆H@ 1.82 Date 16-Nov-10 Time/reading 20.1Operator MYBws (%)4.58 # of Ports 2 Total Run241.0Filter Number 10081612 Condensate Volume 72Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.78Barometric29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain 20DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)29.80Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.27Actual Dn (in)0.2O2 (%)19.90 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2)0.00022CO2 (%)0.8Md28.92Stack Area (sf)3.14Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.42Act. Flow (cfm)7,498Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnPreliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)180.7Wet Ref Flow (cfm)5,982Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)5,708Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.60.0 20.1 7:21427.57 0.43 193 43 430.550.429 242 250 57 4520.1 40.2 7:41435.23 0.43 194 48 450.550.429 250 250 67 4440.2 60.2 8:01442.91 0.42 194 56 500.540.429 252 251 60 4360.2 80.3 8:21450.53 0.34 194 65 590.440.434 249 251 56 4280.3 100.4 8:41457.35 0.34 197 71 650.440.441 251 252 55 41100.4 120.5 9:01464.37 0.37 198 74 690.480.442 250 253 53 46120.5 140.6 9:39471.69 0.39 200 73 730.500.444 253 253 51 45140.6 160.6 9:59479.27 0.40 201 75 730.510.445 252 253 67 44160.6 180.7 10:19486.81 0.45 202 79 750.580.444 250 250 63 43180.7 200.8 10:39494.83 0.39 203 80 770.500.444 253 253 65 42200.8 220.9 10:59502.29 0.39 204 80 770.500.444 250 251 67 41220.9 241.0 11:19509.91 0.39 204 80 770.500.443 254 66 64 246241.0 11:40517.55Average:89.98 0.40 198.7 68.7 65.30.510.44 251 236 60.4166667 24Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # 3 ft A Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port 6Start Finish Pre PostCompany Johns Manville DGM # MB-3 Method OTM27/28 Total Points120.000 0.000 @15" @10"Location Richmond, INRate (cfm)0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 19.8Source EMF Delta∆H@ 1.82 Date 16-Nov-10 Time/reading 19.8Operator MYBws (%)7.23 # of Ports 2 Total Run237.8Filter Number 10072309 Condensate Volume 112Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.78Barometric29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain 32DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)29.80Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.27Actual Dn (in)0.2O2 (%)20.00 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2)0.00022CO2 (%)0.6Md28.90Stack Area (sf)3.14Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.11Act. Flow (cfm)7,385Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnPreliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)178.4Wet Ref Flow (cfm)5,982Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)5,549Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.60.0 19.8 11:55517.77 0.40 182 79 780.510.475 250 250 67 4519.8 39.6 12:14525.50 0.39 186 78 760.490.475 250 251 67 4439.6 59.5 12:33533.06 0.39 189 77 750.490.467 250 252 67 4359.5 79.3 12:52540.63 0.35 201 75 740.440.427 252 250 67 4279.3 99.1 13:11547.42 0.42 197 73 720.530.411 249 251 67 4199.1 118.9 13:30555.05 0.45 195 71 700.570.414 250 252 67 46118.9 138.7 14:05562.92 0.32 193 70 690.400.415 250 247 53 45138.7 158.5 14:24569.51 0.34 189 72 700.430.417 247 250 53 44158.5 178.4 14:43576.09 0.35 188 71 700.440.423 251 251 53 43178.4 198.2 15:02583.17 0.40 187 72 700.510.424 251 252 54 42198.2 218.0 15:21590.20 0.43 180 75 710.540.426 250 250 50 41218.0 237.8 15:40598.02 0.38 179 77 730.480.436 250 250 46 4237.8 16:06605.59Average:87.82 0.39 188.8 74.2 72.30.490.43 250.0 250.5 59.3 4Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # 3 ft A Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port 6Start Finish Pre PostCompany Johns Manville DGM # MB-3 Method OTM27/28 Total Points120.001 0.000 @12" @12"Location Richmond, INRate (cfm)0.75 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 17.7Source EMF Delta∆H@ 1.82 Date 17-Nov-10 Time/reading 17.7Operator MYBws (%)9.72 # of Ports 2 Total Run212.8Filter Number 10090237 Condensate Volume 130Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.78Barometric29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain 38DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)29.80Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.27Actual Dn (in)0.2O2 (%)20.30 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2)0.00022CO2 (%)0.4Md28.88Stack Area (sf)3.14Est.DH(in H2O) Ms27.82Act. Flow (cfm)6,626Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnPreliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)159.6Wet Ref Flow (cfm)5,397Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)4,872Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.60.0 17.7 7:43605.64 0.25 185 53 530.300.394 250 250 62 4517.7 35.5 8:00611.16 0.28 186 58 560.340.394 250 250 47 4435.5 53.2 8:17617.08 0.30 186 62 590.360.395 250 252 49 4353.2 70.9 8:34623.00 0.34 186 64 610.410.397 250 250 46 4270.9 88.7 8:51629.29 0.34 186 66 630.410.399 250 250 49 3188.7 106.4 9:08635.62 0.35 186 69 650.420.4 250 250 48 36106.4 124.2 9:35642.00 0.29 186 69 680.350.402 250 250 47 35124.2 141.9 9:52647.93 0.29 186 73 700.350.404 250 250 42 34141.9 159.6 10:09653.79 0.30 183 75 720.360.406 250 250 43 33159.6 177.4 10:26659.88 0.30 185 76 730.360.411 250 250 43 32177.4 195.1 10:43666.00 0.32 184 77 740.380.409 250 250 43 31195.1 212.8 11:00672.32 0.34 184 77 750.410.411 250 250 45 3212.8 11:21678.91Average:73.27 0.31 185.3 68.3 65.80.370.40 250.0 250.2 47 3.3Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # 3ft B Pollutant Metals Points/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany JM DGM # MB3 Method 29 Total Points24.005@15" .00@10"Location RichmondRate (cfm)0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 8.0Source EMF Delta∆H@ 1.82 Date 17-Nov-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator PMBws (%)7.46 # of Ports 2 Total Run192.0Filter Number10092204Condensate Volume197Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)30.00Barometric30.02 Silica Gel Weight Gain 28DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)30.24Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.27Actual Dn (in)0.31O2 (%)20.3 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2)0.00052CO2 (%)0.4Md28.88Stack Area (sf)3.14Est.DH(in H2O)3.00Ms28.07Act. Flow (cfm)5,424Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnPreliminary dP (in H20)0.36Total Vol.(cf)144.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)4,454Preliminary Ts (oF)125Est. Us (ft/s)35.9Dry Ref Flow (cfm)4,122Preliminary Tm (oF)85Theor Dn (in)0.2720 Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 4.0 11:58679.14 0.25 185 74 741.851.82 250 250 47 3124.0 8.0 12:02682.06 0.25 184 75 731.851.82 250 250 48 3118.0 12.0 12:06685.11 0.25 184 77 741.851.82 250 250 49 31112.0 16.0 12:10688.13 0.25 184 79 741.851.82 250 250 47 31016.0 20.0 12:14691.14 0.30 184 80 742.222.19 250 250 48 31020.0 24.0 12:18694.39 0.30 184 81 742.222.19 250 250 46 3924.0 28.0 12:22697.76 0.22 185 82 751.631.61 250 250 48 3928.0 32.0 12:26700.59 0.22 185 82 761.631.61 250 250 48 3832.0 36.0 12:30703.36 0.22 185 83 761.631.61 250 250 47 3836.0 40.0 12:34706.21 0.22 185 83 761.631.61 250 250 49 3740.0 44.0 12:38709.07 0.22 186 83 771.631.61 250 250 49 3744.0 48.0 12:42711.91 0.22 186 84 771.631.61 250 250 49 3648.0 52.0 12:46714.73 0.18 186 84 771.331.31 250 250 49 3652.0 56.0 12:50717.33 0.18 185 84 781.331.31 250 250 48 3556.0 60.0 12:54719.91 0.18 185 84 781.331.31 250 250 48 3560.0 64.0 12:58722.47 0.18 183 85 791.331.31 250 250 48 3464.0 68.0 13:02725.06 0.19 182 85 791.411.39 250 250 46 3468.0 72.0 13:06727.80 0.19 181 84 791.411.39 250 250 47 3372.0 76.0 13:10730.41 0.19 180 84 791.411.39 250 250 48 3376.0 80.0 13:14733.05 0.15 181 85 801.111.1 250 250 48 3280.0 84.0 13:18735.44 0.15 182 85 801.111.1 250 250 48 3284.0 88.0 13:22737.82 0.15 183 85 801.111.1 250 250 49 3188.0 92.0 13:26740.2 0.15 182 85 801.111.1 250 250 50 3192.0 96.0 13:30742.57 0.15 182 85 801.111.1 250 250 53 31296.0 100.0 13:39744.95 0.18 179 82 781.331.32 250 250 48 312100.0 104.0 13:43747.57 0.18 179 84 801.331.32 250 250 49 311104.0 108.0 13:47750.16 0.18 181 85 801.331.32 250 250 48 311108.0 112.0 13:51752.73 0.18 183 86 811.331.32 250 250 51 310112.0 116.0 13:55755.31 0.16 184 85 801.181.17 250 250 49 310116.0 120.0 13:59757.78 0.16 185 85 811.181.17 250 250 49 39120.0 124.0 14:03760.22 0.18 186 85 811.331.32 250 250 50 39124.0 128.0 14:07762.8 0.18 186 86 811.331.32 250 250 52 38128.0 132.0 14:11765.39 0.19 186 85 811.411.39 250 250 52 38132.0 136.0 14:15768.02 0.19 186 85 811.411.39 250 250 52 37136.0 140.0 14:19770.68 0.20 186 86 811.481.46 250 250 53 37140.0 144.0 14:23773.39 0.20 186 86 811.481.46 250 250 53 36144.0 148.0 14:27776.11 0.22 188 86 811.631.61 250 250 54 36148.0 152.0 14:31778.95 0.22 188 86 811.631.61 250 250 52 35152.0 156.0 14:35781.79 0.23 188 86 811.701.68 250 250 56 35156.0 160.0 14:39784.69 0.23 188 86 811.701.68 250 250 56 34160.0 164.0 14:43787.65 0.26 188 86 811.921.91 250 250 63 34164.0 168.0 14:47790.69 0.26 187 86 811.921.91 250 250 57 33168.0 172.0 14:51793.78 0.26 187 86 811.921.91 250 250 55 33172.0 176.0 14:55796.84 0.26 187 86 811.921.91 250 250 55 32176.0 180.0 14:59799.97 0.27 187 86 812.001.98 250 250 56 32180.0 184.0 15:03803.08 0.27 186 86 812.001.98 250 250 57 31184.0 188.0 15:07806.27 0.27 186 86 812.001.98 250 250 56 31188.0 192.0 15:11809.42 0.27 186 86 812.001.98 250 250 52 4192.0 15:15812.57Average:133.43 0.21 184.6 84.0 78.91.571.55 250 250 50.6666667 3Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # 3ft B Pollutant Metals Points/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany JM DGM # MB3 Method 29 Total Points24Location RichmondRate (cfm)0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 8.0Source EMF Delta∆H@ 1.82 Date 18-Nov-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator PMBws (%)5.8 # of Ports 2 Total Run192.0Filter Number10092202Condensate Volume189Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)30.18Barometric30.20 Silica Gel Weight Gain 36DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)30.42Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.27Actual Dn (in)0.31O2 (%)19.9 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2)0.00052CO2 (%)0.8Md28.92Stack Area (sf)3.14Est.DH(in H2O)3.00Ms28.29Act. Flow (cfm)7,007Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnPreliminary dP (in H20)0.36Total Vol.(cf)144.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)5,803Preliminary Ts (oF)125Est. Us (ft/s)35.7Dry Ref Flow (cfm)5,465Preliminary Tm (oF)85Theor Dn (in)0.2706 Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 4.0 7:23813.13 0.46 183 49 493.463.17 250 250 64 5124.0 8.0 7:27816.9 0.46 183 52 503.463.17 250 250 55 5118.0 12.0 7:31820.78 0.46 183 56 513.463.17 250 250 53 51112.0 16.0 7:35824.6 0.46 183 59 523.463.18 250 250 48 51016.0 20.0 7:39828.45 0.42 184 63 533.152.92 250 250 47 51020.0 24.0 7:43832.34 0.42 183 65 543.152.92 250 250 46 5924.0 28.0 7:47835.97 0.40 184 68 563.002.79 250 250 48 5928.0 32.0 7:51839.66 0.40 183 70 583.002.79 250 250 46 5832.0 36.0 7:55843.35 0.38 184 72 592.852.66 250 250 44 5836.0 40.0 7:59846.94 0.38 184 73 612.852.66 250 250 45 5740.0 44.0 8:03850.51 0.40 184 74 623.002.81 250 250 45 5744.0 48.0 8:07854.19 0.40 184 75 633.002.81 250 250 44 5648.0 52.0 8:11857.9 0.40 184 76 653.002.82 250 250 46 5652.0 56.0 8:15861.64 0.40 184 78 663.002.82 250 250 46 5556.0 60.0 8:19865.36 0.38 183 78 672.852.69 250 250 45 5560.0 64.0 8:23869.02 0.38 183 79 682.852.69 250 250 45 5464.0 68.0 8:27872.68 0.35 183 79 682.632.49 250 250 45 5468.0 72.0 8:31876.22 0.35 182 80 702.632.49 250 250 46 5372.0 76.0 8:35879.78 0.35 183 81 702.632.49 250 250 46 5376.0 80.0 8:39883.31 0.35 183 81 712.632.49 250 250 46 5280.0 84.0 8:43886.87 0.35 182 81 712.632.49 250 250 44 5284.0 88.0 8:47890.45 0.35 182 82 722.632.49 250 250 45 5188.0 92.0 8:51893.97 0.35 181 82 722.632.49 250 250 45 5192.0 96.0 8:55897.58 0.35 181 82 722.632.5 250 250 45 51296.0 100.0 9:03901.08 0.32 179 77 742.402.29 250 250 44 412100.0 104.0 9:07904.48 0.32 179 81 742.402.29 250 250 46 411104.0 108.0 9:11907.85 0.32 179 84 742.402.29 250 250 45 411108.0 112.0 9:15911.25 0.32 179 84 752.402.29 250 250 47 410112.0 116.0 9:19914.68 0.29 179 84 752.182.08 250 250 48 410116.0 120.0 9:23917.92 0.29 180 84 742.182.08 250 250 48 49120.0 124.0 9:27921.14 0.30 180 84 772.252.16 250 250 50 49124.0 128.0 9:31924.43 0.30 182 85 772.252.16 250 250 49 48128.0 132.0 9:35927.75 0.32 184 84 772.402.3 250 250 52 48132.0 136.0 9:39931.18 0.32 185 85 772.402.3 250 250 51 47136.0 140.0 9:43934.58 0.32 185 85 772.402.3 250 250 53 47140.0 144.0 9:47938 0.32 185 85 782.402.3 250 250 53 46144.0 148.0 9:51941.42 0.34 186 85 782.552.45 250 250 58 46148.0 152.0 9:55944.94 0.34 185 85 782.552.45 250 250 61 45152.0 156.0 9:59948.46 0.35 186 85 782.632.53 250 250 61 45156.0 160.0 10:03952.02 0.35 185 85 782.632.52 250 250 64 44160.0 164.0 10:07955.62 0.35 185 85 782.632.52 250 250 63 44164.0 168.0 10:11959.21 0.35 185 85 782.632.52 250 250 64 43168.0 172.0 10:15962.76 0.32 185 85 782.402.31 250 250 63 43172.0 176.0 10:19966.18 0.32 185 85 782.402.31 250 250 56 42176.0 180.0 10:23969.58 0.32 185 86 792.402.31 250 250 55 42180.0 184.0 10:27972.99 0.32 185 86 782.402.31 250 250 55 41184.0 188.0 10:31976.42 0.32 185 86 782.402.31 250 250 53 41188.0 192.0 10:35979.85 0.32 185 86 792.402.31 250 250 53 4192.0 10:39983.3Average:170.17 0.36 183.1 78.4 69.72.682.54 250.0 250.0 50.4 4Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # 3ft B Pollutant Metals Points/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany JM DGM # MB3 Method 29 Total Points24Location RichmondRate (cfm)0.75 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 8.0Source EMF Delta∆H@ 1.82 Date 18-Nov-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator PMBws (%)6.7 # of Ports 2 Total Run192.0Filter Number10092203Condensate Volume186Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)30.18Barometric30.20 Silica Gel Weight Gain 29DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)30.42Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.27Actual Dn (in)0.31O2 (%)20.5 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2)0.00052CO2 (%)0.1Md28.84Stack Area (sf)3.14Est.DH(in H2O)3.00Ms28.11Act. Flow (cfm)5,765Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnPreliminary dP (in H20)0.36Total Vol.(cf)144.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)4,763Preliminary Ts (oF)125Est. Us (ft/s)35.8Dry Ref Flow (cfm)4,444Preliminary Tm (oF)85Theor Dn (in)0.2715 Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 4.0 10:58983.50 0.30 185 77 782.262.18 250 250 65 3124.0 8.0 11:02986.83 0.30 185 79 772.262.18 250 250 58 3118.0 12.0 11:06990.12 0.30 184 82 772.262.18 250 250 56 31112.0 16.0 11:10993.41 0.30 184 82 772.262.18 250 250 54 31016.0 20.0 11:14996.7 0.30 184 83 782.262.18 250 250 51 31020.0 24.0 11:181000.02 0.30 185 84 782.262.18 250 250 50 3924.0 28.0 11:221003.33 0.29 185 85 782.182.12 250 250 50 3928.0 32.0 11:261006.59 0.29 185 85 782.182.12 250 250 50 3832.0 36.0 11:301009.85 0.28 185 85 782.112.05 250 250 51 3836.0 40.0 11:341013.05 0.28 185 85 782.112.05 250 250 52 3740.0 44.0 11:381016.23 0.27 186 85 782.031.97 250 250 53 3744.0 48.0 11:421019.37 0.27 186 86 792.031.97 250 250 54 3648.0 52.0 11:461022.53 0.27 186 86 792.031.97 250 250 58 3652.0 56.0 11:501025.66 0.27 186 86 792.031.97 250 250 59 3556.0 60.0 11:541028.79 0.21 186 86 791.581.53 250 250 58 3560.0 64.0 11:581031.60 0.21 185 86 801.581.53 250 250 56 3464.0 68.0 12:021034.38 0.21 185 86 801.581.53 250 250 58 3468.0 72.0 12:061037.15 0.21 184 86 801.581.53 250 250 60 3372.0 76.0 12:101039.92 0.21 184 86 801.581.53 250 250 60 3376.0 80.0 12:141042.69 0.21 185 86 801.581.53 250 250 60 3280.0 84.0 12:181045.49 0.21 184 87 811.581.53 250 250 62 3284.0 88.0 12:221048.28 0.21 184 87 811.581.53 250 250 63 3188.0 92.0 12:261051.06 0.21 184 87 811.581.53 250 250 63 3192.0 96.0 12:301053.84 0.21 184 87 811.581.53 250 250 63 31296.0 100.0 12:381056.64 0.21 183 82 811.581.54 250 250 61 312100.0 104.0 12:421059.41 0.21 182 86 811.581.54 250 250 57 311104.0 108.0 12:461062.2 0.21 182 86 811.581.54 250 250 57 311108.0 112.0 12:501064.98 0.21 183 87 821.581.54 250 250 56 310112.0 116.0 12:541067.80 0.21 183 87 821.581.54 250 250 56 310116.0 120.0 12:581070.58 0.21 183 87 821.581.54 250 250 56 39120.0 124.0 13:021073.37 0.23 183 87 821.731.69 250 250 57 39124.0 128.0 13:061076.31 0.23 183 87 821.731.69 250 250 58 38128.0 132.0 13:101079.23 0.20 183 87 821.501.47 250 250 60 38132.0 136.0 13:141081.99 0.20 183 87 821.501.41 250 250 60 37136.0 140.0 13:181084.74 0.18 183 87 821.351.32 250 250 60 37140.0 144.0 13:221087.35 0.18 183 87 821.351.32 250 250 60 36144.0 148.0 13:261089.94 0.21 185 87 821.581.54 250 250 57 36148.0 152.0 13:301092.73 0.21 185 87 821.581.54 250 250 54 35152.0 156.0 13:341095.54 0.25 185 87 821.881.84 250 250 57 35156.0 160.0 13:381098.58 0.25 185 87 821.881.84 250 250 57 34160.0 164.0 13:421101.62 0.25 185 88 831.881.84 250 250 58 34164.0 168.0 13:461104.66 0.25 185 88 831.881.84 250 250 58 33168.0 172.0 13:501107.68 0.25 185 88 831.881.84 250 250 58 33172.0 176.0 13:541110.75 0.25 185 88 831.881.84 250 250 58 32176.0 180.0 13:581113.78 0.25 188 89 831.881.84 250 250 58 32180.0 184.0 14:021116.84 0.25 188 89 841.881.84 250 250 58 31184.0 188.0 14:061119.92 0.25 188 89 841.881.84 250 250 58 31188.0 192.0 14:101122.98 0.25 188 89 831.881.84 250 250 56 3192.0 14:141126.02Average:142.52 0.24 184.6 86.0 80.61.801.75 250.0 250.0 57.2708333 3.0Leak CheckBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # Hg probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Johns Manville DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points1Location Richmond, IN Rate (L/m) 1.25 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 5.0Source Electric Furnace Delta∆H@ Date 16-Nov-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator PM Bws (%) # of Ports 1 Total Run120.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume NACp Ps (in Hg)29.78Barometric29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain NADGM Y1Pm (in Hg)29.80Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.27Actual Dn (in)NAO2 (%)Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2) CO2 (%) Md28.00Stack Area (sf)3.14Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.00Act. Flow (cfm)#DIV/0!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)150.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#DIV/0!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#DIV/0!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempCondenser FilterTemp (*F)A B A B A B AB A B A B7:32:00 AM 0.0 188.0 255 256 1.25 1.25 6 6 0.00 0 47 46 5905.1 6115.97:37:00 AM 5.0 190.0 254 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 6.70 6.64 49 497:42:00 AM 10.0 190.0 256 254 1.25 1.25 5 5 12.84 12.73 50 497:47:00 AM 15.0 190.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 18.36 18.4 51 517:52:00 AM 20.0 190.0 254 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 25.14 25.06 52 527:57:00 AM 25.0 190.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 32.03 31.48 53 538:02:00 AM 30.0 191.0 254 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 38.15 37.76 54 548:07:00 AM 35.0 191.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 44.12 43.78 55 558:12:00 AM 40.0 191.0 254 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 49.48 49.96 55 558:17:00 AM 45.0 191.0 254 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 55.91 55.87 56 568:22:00 AM 50.0 191.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 62.40 62.14 57 578:27:00 AM 55.0 192.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 69.03 69.02 57 578:32:00 AM 60.0 192.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 75.68 76.02 57 578:37:00 AM 65.0 193.0 254 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 82.15 82.34 58 588:42:00 AM 70.0 193.0 255 256 1.25 1.25 6 6 88.38 88.21 58 588:47:00 AM 75.0 194.0 254 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 94.43 93.75 59 558:52:00 AM 80.0 194.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 100.25 99.78 59 558:57:00 AM 85.0 194.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 5 5 106.15 106.25 60 609:02:00 AM 90.0 194.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 111.65 112.15 61 619:07:00 AM 95.0 194.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 118.42 118.57 62 629:12:00 AM 100.0 195.0 254 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 125.84 125.36 62 629:17:00 AM 105.0 195.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 132.78 132.12 63 639:22:00 AM 110.0 195.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 139.12 138.54 64 649:27:00 AM 115.0 195.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 145.45 144.96 64 649:32:00 AM 120.0 195.0 254 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 151.140 151.32 64 64 6060.2 6273.8Average 120.0 192.3 254.7 254.657.08 56.68Volume151.140 151.320 155.1 157.9dscm0.15 0.15 157.74 160.71Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading m3Pre Test Post Test Pre Test Post Test12.0/0.0000 10.0/0.000 10.0/0.001 10.0/0.002Trap/ Probe TempBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # Hg probe Pollutant Hg Points/PortCompany Johns Manville DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points0Location Richmond, IN Rate (L/m) 1.25 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) N/ASource Electric Furnace Delta∆H@ Date 16-Nov-10 Time/readingOperator PM Bws (%) # of Ports 1 Total Run120.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume NACp Ps (in Hg)29.78Barometric29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain NADGM Y1Pm (in Hg)29.80Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.27Actual Dn (in)NAO2 (%)Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2) CO2 (%) Md28.00Stack Area (sf)3.14Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.00Act. Flow (cfm)#DIV/0!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)150.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#DIV/0!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#DIV/0!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempCondenser FilterTemp (*F)A B A B A B AB A B A B9:44:00 AM 0.0 195.0 256 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 0.00 0 66 66 6060.5 6274.69:49:00 AM 5.0 197.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 6.17 6.11 66 669:54:00 AM 10.0 197.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 12.35 12.24 67 679:59:00 AM 15.0 198.0 254 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 18.63 18.8 67 6710:04:00 AM 20.0 198.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 25.12 24.91 67 6710:09:00 AM 25.0 199.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 31.58 31.37 67 6710:14:00 AM 30.0 200.0 254 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 37.98 37.77 68 6810:19:00 AM 35.0 200.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 44.20 44.23 68 6810:24:00 AM 40.0 200.0 254 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 50.24 50.51 68 6810:29:00 AM 45.0 200.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 56.29 56.75 69 6910:34:00 AM 50.0 200.0 255 256 1.25 1.25 6 6 62.25 62.87 69 6910:39:00 AM 55.0 200.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 68.23 68.94 69 6910:44:00 AM 60.0 200.0 256 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 74.91 74.98 70 7010:49:00 AM 65.0 201.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 81.31 80.94 70 7010:54:00 AM 70.0 201.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 87.81 87.08 70 7010:59:00 AM 75.0 201.0 254 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 94.31 93.3 70 7011:04:00 AM 80.0 201.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 100.74 99.68 71 7111:09:00 AM 85.0 201.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 107.04 106.16 71 7111:14:00 AM 90.0 201.0 254 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 113.22 112.71 71 7111:19:00 AM 95.0 202.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 119.20 119.31 71 7111:24:00 AM 100.0 201.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 125.25 125.9 71 7111:29:00 AM 105.0 201.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 130.06 131.25 71 7111:34:00 AM 110.0 201.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 137.56 138.87 71 7111:39:00 AM 115.0 200.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 143.90 145.27 71 7111:44:00 AM 120.0 200.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 150.54 151.08 71 71 6215.1 6432.8Average 120.0 199.8 254.9 254.869.2 69.20Volume150.540 151.080 154.6 158.2dscm0.15 0.15 153.63 157.21Trap/ Probe TempPost Test12.0/0.000 10.0/0.000 10.0/0.001 10.0/0.002Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading m3Pre Test Post Test Pre TestBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # Hg probe Pollutant Hg Points/PortCompany Johns Manville DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points0Location Richmond, IN Rate (L/m) 1.25 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) N/ASource Electric Furnace Delta∆H@ Date 16-Nov-10 Time/readingOperator PM Bws (%) # of Ports 1 Total Run120.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume NACp Ps (in Hg)29.78Barometric29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain NADGM Y1Pm (in Hg)29.80Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.27Actual Dn (in)NAO2 (%)Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2) CO2 (%) Md28.00Stack Area (sf)3.14Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.00Act. Flow (cfm)#DIV/0!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)150.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#DIV/0!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#DIV/0!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempCondenser FilterTemp (*F)A B A B A B AB A B A B2:00:00 PM 0.0 200.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 0.00 0 72 72 6215.4 6433.22:05:00 PM 5.0 200.0 254 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 6.53 7.06 72 722:10:00 PM 10.0 200.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 12.75 13.2 72 722:15:00 PM 15.0 199.0 254 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 18.04 18.93 71 712:20:00 PM 20.0 198.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 24.93 24.44 71 712:25:00 PM 25.0 199.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 30.94 31.19 71 712:30:00 PM 30.0 199.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 37.75 37.89 71 712:35:00 PM 35.0 199.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 43.76 44.6 71 712:40:00 PM 40.0 199.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 50.17 51.05 71 712:45:00 PM 45.0 199.0 255 254 1.25 1.25 6 6 56.68 57.01 71 712:50:00 PM 50.0 198.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 63.13 63.34 71 712:55:00 PM 55.0 198.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 69.60 69.1 71 713:00:00 PM 60.0 197.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 76.05 74.46 71 713:05:00 PM 65.0 197.0 254 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 82.01 81.54 71 713:10:00 PM 70.0 197.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 87.95 87.46 71 713:15:00 PM 75.0 197.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 93.92 94.56 71 713:20:00 PM 80.0 195.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 99.78 101.05 72 723:25:00 PM 85.0 195.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 105.87 107.25 72 723:30:00 PM 90.0 195.0 256 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 112.01 113.09 72 723:35:00 PM 95.0 194.0 254 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 118.26 119.04 72 723:40:00 PM 100.0 194.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 124.56 125.61 72 723:45:00 PM 105.0 193.0 254 256 1.25 1.25 6 6 130.76 130.76 71 713:50:00 PM 110.0 193.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 136.92 136.31 71 713:55:00 PM 115.0 193.0 255 256 1.25 1.25 6 6 143.12 142.91 71 714:00:00 PM 120.0 193.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 6 150.23 150.65 71 71 6369.50 6589.00Average 120.0 196.8 254.8 255.071.32 71.32Volume150.230 150.650 154.1 155.8dscm0.15 0.15 152.52 154.21Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading m3Pre Test Post Test Pre Test Post Test12.0/0.000 12/0.001 12/0.001 12/0.002Trap/ Probe TempBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # Air Cooled Pollutant Hex ChromePoints/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany JM DGM # MB4 Method 61 Total Points24.015@12" .01@8"Location RichmondRate (cfm)0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 8.0Source EMF Delta∆H@ 1.71 Date 17-Nov-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator MYBws (%)7.81 # of Ports 2 Total Run192.0Filter NumberCondensate Volume227Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)30.00Barometric30.02 Silica Gel Weight Gain 33DGM Y0.994Pm (in Hg)30.24Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.27Actual Dn (in)0.31O2 (%)20.3 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2)0.00052CO2 (%)0.4Md28.88Stack Area (sf)3.14Est.DH(in H2O)3.00Ms28.03Act. Flow (cfm)5,985Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnPreliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)144.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)4,911Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)4,528Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 4.0 11:58204.31 0.29 184 67 671.981.94 48 3124.0 8.0 12:02207.44 0.29 184 65 661.981.94 49 3118.0 12.0 12:06210.63 0.29 184 68 671.981.94 49 31112.0 16.0 12:10213.81 0.29 184 69 671.981.94 49 31016.0 20.0 12:14216.96 0.28 184 70 671.911.88 49 31020.0 24.0 12:18220.09 0.28 184 71 671.911.88 48 3924.0 28.0 12:22223.24 0.29 186 73 671.981.95 49 3928.0 32.0 12:26226.46 0.29 186 74 671.981.95 49 3832.0 36.0 12:30229.69 0.27 185 75 681.841.81 49 3836.0 40.0 12:34232.81 0.27 184 75 681.841.82 52 3740.0 44.0 12:38235.9 0.27 184 76 681.841.82 53 3744.0 48.0 12:42239.02 0.27 185 77 691.841.82 53 3648.0 52.0 12:46242.13 0.29 187 78 701.981.95 53 3652.0 56.0 12:50245.37 0.30 188 79 702.042.02 51 4556.0 60.0 12:54248.66 0.30 188 79 702.042.02 52 4560.0 64.0 12:58251.95 0.29 187 80 711.981.95 51 4464.0 68.0 13:02255.21 0.30 186 80 712.042.02 50 4468.0 72.0 13:06258.49 0.30 185 80 712.042.02 50 4372.0 76.0 13:10261.78 0.28 183 80 711.911.89 53 4376.0 80.0 13:14264.96 0.27 183 79 711.841.82 53 4280.0 84.0 13:18268.1 0.27 186 80 711.841.82 52 4284.0 88.0 13:22271.28 0.27 186 80 721.841.82 54 4188.0 92.0 13:26274.45 0.25 182 80 721.701.69 56 4192.0 96.0 13:30277.53 0.25 180 81 721.711.69 56 41296.0 100.0 13:39280.61 0.24 183 74 731.631.62 55 412100.0 104.0 13:43283.59 0.23 183 79 721.571.56 55 411104.0 108.0 13:47286.47 0.24 184 79 721.631.62 54 411108.0 112.0 13:51289.41 0.24 184 80 731.631.63 55 410112.0 116.0 13:55292.27 0.24 186 80 731.631.63 54 410116.0 120.0 13:59295.24 0.24 186 80 731.631.63 53 49120.0 124.0 14:03298.22 0.25 187 80 731.701.69 55 49124.0 128.0 14:07301.23 0.25 187 80 731.701.69 55 48128.0 132.0 14:11304.25 0.22 187 81 731.501.49 58 48132.0 136.0 14:15307.11 0.22 187 80 731.501.49 58 47136.0 140.0 14:19309.97 0.21 187 81 731.431.42 59 47140.0 144.0 14:23312.75 0.21 187 81 731.431.42 59 46144.0 148.0 14:27315.55 0.23 186 81 731.571.56 59 46148.0 152.0 14:31318.38 0.22 187 80 731.501.49 59 45152.0 156.0 14:35321.22 0.24 187 81 731.631.63 60 45156.0 160.0 14:39324.19 0.24 186 81 731.631.63 60 44160.0 164.0 14:43327.13 0.25 187 81 731.701.7 62 44164.0 168.0 14:47330.1 0.25 186 81 731.701.7 61 43168.0 172.0 14:51333.19 0.23 186 81 741.571.56 58 43172.0 176.0 14:55336.12 0.23 187 81 741.571.56 58 42176.0 180.0 14:59339.06 0.22 184 81 741.501.49 58 42180.0 184.0 15:03341.95 0.22 184 81 741.501.49 59 41184.0 188.0 15:07344.81 0.20 184 81 741.361.36 59 41188.0 192.0 15:11347.57 0.20 182 81 741.361.36 59 4192.0 15:15350.39Average:146.08 0.26 185.2 78.0 71.21.741.73 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 54.375 4Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # Aircooled Pollutant Hex ChromePoints/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany JM DGM # MB4 Method 61 Total Points24.001@12" .001@8"Location RichmondRate (cfm)0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 8.0Source EMF Delta∆H@ 1.71 Date 18-Nov-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator MYBws (%)5.8 # of Ports 2 Total Run192.0Filter NumberCondensate Volume181Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)30.18Barometric30.20 Silica Gel Weight Gain 45DGM Y0.994Pm (in Hg)30.42Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.27Actual Dn (in)0.31O2 (%)19.9 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2)0.00052CO2 (%)0.8Md28.92Stack Area (sf)3.14Est.DH(in H2O)3.00Ms28.29Act. Flow (cfm)7,122Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnPreliminary dP (in H20)0.36Total Vol.(cf)144.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)5,890Preliminary Ts (oF)125Est. Us (ft/s)35.7Dry Ref Flow (cfm)5,550Preliminary Tm (oF)85Theor Dn (in)0.2705 Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 4.0 7:23351.60 0.45 185 48 483.152.9 56 4124.0 8.0 7:27355.19 0.45 184 53 483.152.9 56 4118.0 12.0 7:31359.06 0.44 184 58 493.082.85 57 41112.0 16.0 7:35362.87 0.44 184 59 503.082.26 58 51016.0 20.0 7:39366.71 0.42 184 62 512.942.74 59 51020.0 24.0 7:43370.2 0.42 184 64 522.942.74 61 5924.0 28.0 7:47373.96 0.42 184 66 532.942.74 64 5928.0 32.0 7:51377.75 0.42 184 67 552.942.74 64 5832.0 36.0 7:55381.65 0.39 184 69 562.732.56 65 5836.0 40.0 7:59385.25 0.39 185 69 572.732.56 66 5740.0 44.0 8:03388.94 0.38 184 71 582.662.5 66 5744.0 48.0 8:07392.59 0.38 184 71 592.662.5 61 5648.0 52.0 8:11396.25 0.36 184 72 592.522.37 58 5652.0 56.0 8:15399.93 0.37 184 73 612.592.44 54 5556.0 60.0 8:19403.39 0.39 185 74 622.732.58 53 5560.0 64.0 8:23407.13 0.39 184 75 632.732.58 51 5464.0 68.0 8:27410.76 0.38 184 76 632.662.52 50 5468.0 72.0 8:31414.45 0.37 184 76 652.592.45 51 5372.0 76.0 8:35418.09 0.35 184 77 652.452.32 51 5376.0 80.0 8:39421.54 0.35 184 77 662.452.32 50 5280.0 84.0 8:43425.06 0.35 183 78 662.452.59 50 5284.0 88.0 8:47428.59 0.33 184 78 672.312.2 50 5188.0 92.0 8:51432.01 0.31 182 78 672.172.07 51 4192.0 96.0 8:55435.34 0.32 180 78 682.242.14 51 41296.0 100.0 9:03438.78 0.36 184 70 682.522.4 52 412100.0 104.0 9:07442.33 0.35 184 77 692.452.34 48 411104.0 108.0 9:11445.84 0.34 184 79 692.382.27 49 411108.0 112.0 9:15449.35 0.34 184 80 712.382.27 49 410112.0 116.0 9:19452.87 0.34 184 80 702.382.27 49 410116.0 120.0 9:23456.41 0.37 185 80 702.592.48 49 49120.0 124.0 9:27460.09 0.35 186 81 712.452.34 51 49124.0 128.0 9:31463.63 0.36 187 81 712.522.41 51 48128.0 132.0 9:35467.26 0.35 186 81 712.452.35 51 48132.0 136.0 9:39470.87 0.35 186 81 722.452.35 53 47136.0 140.0 9:43474.47 0.35 186 81 722.452.35 54 47140.0 144.0 9:47478.09 0.34 185 82 722.382.28 54 46144.0 148.0 9:51481.61 0.37 185 81 722.592.48 57 46148.0 152.0 9:55485.31 0.36 185 82 732.522.42 56 45152.0 156.0 9:59488.94 0.38 185 81 732.662.55 55 45156.0 160.0 10:03492.66 0.36 184 82 732.522.42 55 44160.0 164.0 10:07496.27 0.37 184 82 732.592.49 55 44164.0 168.0 10:11499.96 0.37 184 82 742.592.49 57 43168.0 172.0 10:15503.68 0.37 184 82 742.592.49 58 43172.0 176.0 10:19507.36 0.34 184 82 732.382.29 55 42176.0 180.0 10:23510.93 0.33 184 82 732.312.22 55 42180.0 184.0 10:27514.45 0.33 184 82 742.312.22 57 41184.0 188.0 10:31517.97 0.31 180 82 742.172.09 58 41188.0 192.0 10:35521.38 0.30 180 82 742.102.02 58 4192.0 10:39524.74Average:173.14 0.37 184.1 75.1 65.32.582.43 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 55.0 4Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.07 Probe # Aircooled Pollutant Hex ChromePoints/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany JM DGM # MB4 Method 61 Total Points24.005@12" .001@8"Location RichmondRate (cfm)0.75 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 8.0Source EMF Delta∆H@ 1.71 Date 18-Nov-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator MYBws (%)6.9 # of Ports 2 Total Run192.0Filter NumberCondensate Volume204Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)30.18Barometric30.20 Silica Gel Weight Gain 33DGM Y0.994Pm (in Hg)30.20Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.27Actual Dn (in)0.31O2 (%)20.5 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 2.00 An (ft^2)0.00052CO2 (%)0.1Md28.84Stack Area (sf)3.14Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.09Act. Flow (cfm)6,185Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnPreliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)144.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)5,114Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)4,763Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 4.0 10:58525.21 0.37 184 73 732.592.5 65 4124.0 8.0 11:02528.9 0.37 184 78 732.592.5 61 4118.0 12.0 11:06532.62 0.35 184 78 722.452.38 57 41112.0 16.0 11:10536.27 0.35 184 80 732.452.38 56 41016.0 20.0 11:14539.84 0.33 184 80 732.312.25 55 41020.0 24.0 11:18543.33 0.33 184 81 732.312.25 55 4924.0 28.0 11:22546.8 0.33 185 81 732.312.25 57 4928.0 32.0 11:26550.27 0.33 185 81 732.312.25 57 4832.0 36.0 11:30553.73 0.33 185 82 732.312.25 60 4836.0 40.0 11:34557.20 0.33 185 82 732.312.25 60 4740.0 44.0 11:38560.66 0.30 185 82 732.102.05 63 4744.0 48.0 11:42564 0.29 184 82 742.031.98 64 4648.0 52.0 11:46567.33 0.28 185 83 741.961.91 62 4652.0 56.0 11:50570.57 0.28 185 83 741.961.91 60 4556.0 60.0 11:54573.82 0.28 185 83 741.961.91 55 4560.0 64.0 11:58577.04 0.28 184 83 741.961.91 54 4464.0 68.0 12:02580.26 0.29 185 83 752.031.98 53 4468.0 72.0 12:06583.55 0.29 185 83 752.031.98 52 4372.0 76.0 12:10586.83 0.28 185 83 751.961.91 52 4376.0 80.0 12:14590.07 0.27 184 84 761.891.84 53 4280.0 84.0 12:18593.24 0.25 183 84 761.751.71 53 4284.0 88.0 12:22596.33 0.25 183 84 761.751.71 53 4188.0 92.0 12:26599.34 0.23 181 84 761.611.57 53 4192.0 96.0 12:30602.25 0.22 180 84 761.541.51 55 41296.0 100.0 12:38605.12 0.32 184 77 762.242.19 53 412100.0 104.0 12:42608.52 0.32 185 83 762.242.19 53 411104.0 108.0 12:46611.96 0.34 186 83 762.382.33 53 411108.0 112.0 12:50615.49 0.30 184 83 762.102.05 54 410112.0 116.0 12:54618.89 0.28 184 84 761.961.92 55 410116.0 120.0 12:58622.04 0.28 184 84 761.961.92 56 49120.0 124.0 13:02625.3 0.28 184 84 761.961.92 57 49124.0 128.0 13:06628.54 0.28 185 84 771.961.92 59 48128.0 132.0 13:10631.78 0.25 184 84 771.751.71 59 48132.0 136.0 13:14634.84 0.25 185 84 771.751.71 59 47136.0 140.0 13:18637.89 0.24 184 84 771.681.64 57 47140.0 144.0 13:22640.87 0.23 184 84 771.611.58 55 46144.0 148.0 13:26643.83 0.23 184 84 771.611.58 53 46148.0 152.0 13:30646.76 0.23 184 85 771.611.58 54 45152.0 156.0 13:34649.71 0.22 184 85 771.541.51 53 45156.0 160.0 13:38652.58 0.22 184 85 771.541.51 53 44160.0 164.0 13:42655.45 0.22 184 85 771.541.51 54 44164.0 168.0 13:46658.31 0.22 184 85 771.541.51 54 43168.0 172.0 13:50661.17 0.25 184 85 771.751.71 54 43172.0 176.0 13:54664.21 0.24 185 86 781.681.65 54 42176.0 180.0 13:58667.31 0.24 185 86 781.681.65 54 42180.0 184.0 14:02670.31 0.21 185 86 781.471.44 54 41184.0 188.0 14:06673.11 0.21 183 86 781.471.44 55 41188.0 192.0 14:10675.92 0.21 182 86 781.471.44 57 4192.0 14:14678.76Average:153.55 0.28 184.1 83.0 75.51.941.89 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 55.9166667 4.0Leak Check

# APPENDIX D

EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION DOCUMENTSOxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentration Results SummaryJohns Manville - Richmond, IndianaBTEC Project No. 10-3990.07Sampling Dates: November 16-18, 2010Melt FurnaceParameterRun 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 5 Run 6 AverageTest Run Date11/16/2010 11/16/2010 11/17/2010 11/17/2010 11/18/2010 11/18/2010Oxygen concentration (%) 20.1 20.2 20.3 20.3 19.9 20.5 20.2Oxygen concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A) 19.9 20.0 20.3 20.3 19.9 20.5 20.1Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.1 0.5Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A) 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.1 0.6CO2CorrectionO2Correction1 2 3 4 5 6 123456Co0.00 0.00 -0.01 -0.01 -0.01 -0.01Co0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20Cma10.10 10.10 10.10 10.10 10.10 10.10Cma10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00Cm10.0 10.0 10.02 10.02 10.02 10.02Cm10.2 10.2 10.10 10.10 10.10 10.10Co= Average of initial and final zero gasesCma=Actual concentration of the calibration gasCm= Average of initial and final calibration gases

# APPENDIX E

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTSCorrected Corrected Corrected Corrected CorrectedVolume(mL)Acetone(mg)Filter(mg)Organic(mg)Inorganic(mg)Acetone(mg) Filter (mg)Ace + Filter(mg)Organic(mg)Inorganic(mg)Baghouse Stack R141.00 1.80 ND 3.10 2.60 0.880.301.18 1.80 1.90Baghouse Stack R244.00 1.00 ND 3.20 3.10 0.500.300.80 1.90 2.40Baghouse Stack R358.00 1.00 ND 4.10 2.70 0.500.300.80 2.80 2.00Blank49.00 1.10 0.40 3.20 0.70OTM 27/28 PM2.5Lab ResultsJohns ManvilleBTEC Project No. 10-3990.07Sampling Date: November 16-17, 2010Richmond, IndianaCorrected Corrected CorrectedVolume(mL)Acetone(mg)Filter(mg)Acetone(mg) Filter (mg)Ace + Filter(mg)Baghouse Stack R392.00 1.60 ND 1.600.301.90Baghouse Stack R461.00 0.90 ND 0.900.301.20Baghouse Stack R554.00 1.60 ND 1.600.301.90Blank83.00 ND NDNDSampling Date: November 17-18, 2010Method 5 PM Lab ResultsJohns ManvilleRichmond, IndianaBTEC Project No. 10-3990.07Compound/FractionBlankResult(μg)BlankDetectionLimit(μg)Run 1Result(μg)Run 2Result(μg)Run 3Result(μg)Test RunDetectionLimit(μg)Run 1Result(μg)Run 2Result(μg)Run 3Result(μg)BlankCorrectionRun 1Blank-CorrectedResult(μg)Run 2Blank-CorrectedResult(μg)Run 3Blank-CorrectedResult(μg)Antimony ND 0.40 ND ND ND 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.000.80 0.80 0.80Arsenic 1.08 0.40 ND 0.91 1.08 0.80 0.80 0.91 1.08 1.080.80 0.80 0.80Berylium ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.000.20 0.20 0.20Cadmium 0.25 0.10 0.28 0.54 ND 0.20 0.28 0.54 0.20 0.250.20 0.29 0.20Chromium 1.26 0.30 4.13 2.77 2.15 0.60 4.13 2.77 2.15 1.262.87 1.51 0.89Cobalt ND 0.10 1.06 1.81 ND 0.20 1.06 1.81 0.20 0.001.06 1.81 0.20Lead 1.01 0.20 6.58 11.40 1.57 0.40 6.58 11.40 1.57 1.015.57 10.39 0.56Manganese 1.01 0.75 4.10 18.90 2.10 1.50 4.10 18.90 2.10 1.013.09 17.89 1.50Nickle ND 0.50 4.10 6.20 2.30 1.00 4.10 6.20 2.30 0.004.10 6.20 2.30Selenium ND 1.00 2.20 5.40 5.00 2.00 2.20 5.40 5.00 0.002.20 5.40 5.00Uncorrected value (accounting for ND)Melt FurnaceSampling Date: November 17-18, 2010Method 29 Non-Hg HAP Metals Lab ResultsJohns ManvilleRichmond, IndianaBTEC Project No. 10-3990.07Corrected Corrected CorrectedRun 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 1 Run 2 Run 3Baghouse Stack1.00 0.40 0.600.80 0.20 0.40MDL0.50 0.40 0.400.80 0.40 0.40Blank H2ONDBlank KOH 0.20All units ug.Blank corrected values are below MDL. MDL used for calculations.Method 0061 Lab ResultsRichmond, IndianaBTEC Project No. 10-3990.07Sampling Date: November 17-18, 2010Johns Manville

### Your Project #: 10-3990.07

Site: JM RICHMOND

Your C.O.C. #: N/A

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/12/06



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0G8040

Received: 2010/11/22, 14:00

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 10

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 5 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061)

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. ( 1 ) 5 2010/11/30 2010/11/30 BRL SOP-00108 EPA Method 26A

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 5 N/A 2010/11/30

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 5 N/A 2010/11/26

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8040 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/06 Project name: JM RICHMOND



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H X 9 3 9 8 H

X 9 3 9 9 H

X 9 4 0 0 H

X 9 4 0 0

Sampling Date 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 2010/11/16 2010/11/16

COC Number N/A N/A N/A N/A

U n i t s BLANK-H2O-M26A BLANK-H2SO4-M26A RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M26A-H2SO4 1-M26A-H2SO4

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 340 420 450 1 2345550

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND ND ND 200 2345563

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND ND ND 200 2345563

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H X 9 4 0 1 H

X 9 4 0 2 H X 9 4 0 3 H

X 9 4 0 4

Sampling Date 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 2010/11/18 2010/11/18

COC Number N/A N/A

U n i t s RUN RUN QC Batch BLANK-H2O-M0061 BLANK-KOH-M0061 RDL QC Batch

2-M26A-H2SO4 3-M26A-H2SO4

Volume ml 430 440 2345550 490 300 1 2340672

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug ND 0.2 0.2 2340664

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND 2345563 200

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND 2345563 200

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H X 9 4 0 5 H

X 9 4 0 5 H

X 9 4 0 6 H

X 9 4 0 7

Sampling Date 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 2010/11/18 2010/11/18

COC Number

U n i t s RUN RUN RDL RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M0061 1-M0061 2-M0061 3-M0061

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 950 1 810 850 1 2340672

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.4 2340664

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8040 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/06 Project name: JM RICHMOND



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HX9398 Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2345563 2010/11/30 2010/11/30 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2345550 N/A 2010/11/30 A_S

Maxxam ID HX9399 Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID BLANK-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2345563 2010/11/30 2010/11/30 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2345550 N/A 2010/11/30 A_S

Maxxam ID HX9400 Collected 2010/11/16

Sample ID RUN 1-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2345563 2010/11/30 2010/11/30 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2345550 N/A 2010/11/30 A_S

Maxxam ID HX9400 D u p Collected 2010/11/16

Sample ID RUN 1-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2345563 2010/11/30 2010/11/30 A_S

Maxxam ID HX9401 Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID RUN 2-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2345563 2010/11/30 2010/11/30 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2345550 N/A 2010/11/30 A_S

Maxxam ID HX9402 Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID RUN 3-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2345563 2010/11/30 2010/11/30 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2345550 N/A 2010/11/30 A_S

Page 3 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8040 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/06 Project name: JM RICHMOND



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HX9403 Collected 2010/11/18

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2340664 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2340672 N/A 2010/11/26 FMO

Maxxam ID HX9404 Collected 2010/11/18

Sample ID BLANK-KOH-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2340664 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2340672 N/A 2010/11/26 FMO

Maxxam ID HX9405 Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2340664 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2340672 N/A 2010/11/26 FMO

Maxxam ID HX9405 D u p Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2340664 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 LLE

Maxxam ID HX9406 Collected 2010/11/18

Sample ID RUN 2-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2340664 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2340672 N/A 2010/11/26 FMO

Maxxam ID HX9407 Collected 2010/11/18

Sample ID RUN 3-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2340664 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2340672 N/A 2010/11/26 FMO

Page 4 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8040 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/06 Project name: JM RICHMOND

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.07

P.O. #:

Project name: JM RICHMOND



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0G8040

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2340664 LLE Matrix Spike

(HX9405) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/25 104 % 80

- 120

Spiked Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/25 101 % 90

- 110

Method Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/25 ND, RDL=0.2 ug

RPD

- Sample/Sample

Dup Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/25 NC % 20

2345563 A_S Matrix Spike

(HX9400) Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/30 95 % 80

- 120

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/30 98 % 80

- 120

Spiked Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/30 96 % 90

- 110

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/30 101 % 90

- 110

Method Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/30 ND, RDL=200 ug

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/30 ND, RDL=200 ug

RPD

- Sample/Sample

Dup Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/30 NC % 20

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/30 NC % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 6 of 6

### Your Project #: 10-3990.07

Site: JM RICHMOND

Your C.O.C. #: 0698

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/12/01



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0G8002

Received: 2010/11/22, 14:00

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 8

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) ( 1 ) 4 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) ( 1 ) 4 2010/11/29 2010/11/29 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) ( 2 ) 4 N/A 2010/11/25 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM

- 027

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) ( 2 ) 4 2010/11/23 2010/11/30 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM

- 027

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/11/24

Weight of DCM Received 4 N/A 2010/11/24

Weight of Water from Impingers 4 N/A 2010/11/24

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This is a non-accredited test.

(2) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8002 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/01 Project name: JM RICHMOND



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H X 9 1 5 3 H

X 9 1 5 4 H

X 9 1 5 5 H

X 9 1 5 6 H

X 9 1 5 9

Sampling Date 2010/11/17 2010/11/16 2010/11/16 2010/11/17 2010/11/17

COC Number 0698 0698 0698 0698

U n i t s TRAIN R1-OTM28 R2-OTM28 R3-OTM28 TRAIN RDL QC Batch

BLANK-OTM28 BLANK-OTM27

< 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 1.1 0.5 2337916

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg 0.40 0.30 2339631

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5) ml 49 1 2338096

Weight g 270 260 270 280 0.1 2339505

DCM Weight g 140 130 180 160 0.1 2339503

Inorganic Condensible PM mg 0.70 2.6 3.1 2.7 0.50 2343448

Organic Condensible PM mg 3.2 3.1 3.2 4.1 1.0 2339500

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H X 9 1 6 0 H

X 9 1 6 1 H

X 9 1 6 2

Sampling Date 2010/11/16 2010/11/16 2010/11/17

COC Number

U n i t s R1-OTM27 R2-OTM27 R3-OTM27 RDL QC Batch

< 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 1.8 1.0 1.0 0.5 2337916

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg ND ND ND 0.30 2339631

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5) ml 41 44 58 1 2338096

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8002 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/01 Project name: JM RICHMOND



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HX9153 Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2339500 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2343448 2010/11/29 2010/11/29 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2339503 N/A 2010/11/24

Weight of Water from Impingers 2339505 N/A 2010/11/24 FMO

Maxxam ID HX9154 Collected 2010/11/16

Sample ID R1-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2339500 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2343448 2010/11/29 2010/11/29 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2339503 N/A 2010/11/24

Weight of Water from Impingers 2339505 N/A 2010/11/24 FMO

Maxxam ID HX9155 Collected 2010/11/16

Sample ID R2-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2339500 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2343448 2010/11/29 2010/11/29 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2339503 N/A 2010/11/24

Weight of Water from Impingers 2339505 N/A 2010/11/24 FMO

Maxxam ID HX9156 Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID R3-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2339500 2010/11/25 2010/11/25 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2343448 2010/11/29 2010/11/29 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2339503 N/A 2010/11/24

Weight of Water from Impingers 2339505 N/A 2010/11/24 FMO

Maxxam ID HX9159 Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2339631 N/A 2010/11/25 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2337916 2010/11/23 2010/11/30 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2338096 N/A 2010/11/24 NUA

Page 3 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8002 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/01 Project name: JM RICHMOND



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HX9160 Collected 2010/11/16

Sample ID R1-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2339631 N/A 2010/11/25 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2337916 2010/11/23 2010/11/30 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2338096 N/A 2010/11/24 NUA

Maxxam ID HX9161 Collected 2010/11/16

Sample ID R2-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2339631 N/A 2010/11/25 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2337916 2010/11/23 2010/11/30 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2338096 N/A 2010/11/24 NUA

Maxxam ID HX9162 Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID R3-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2339631 N/A 2010/11/25 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2337916 2010/11/23 2010/11/30 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2338096 N/A 2010/11/24 NUA

Page 4 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8002 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/01 Project name: JM RICHMOND

GENERAL COMMENTS

Sample HX9153-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HX9154-01: Different sampling dates were found on DI water rinse (2010-11-16) and DCM/Acetone rinse (2010-11-17) of R-1.

ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Brownish oily material found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HX9155-01: Different sampling dates were found on DI water rinse (2010-11-16) and DCM/Acetone rinse (2010-11-17) of R-2.

ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Brownish oily material found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HX9156-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Brownish oily material found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027): Reagent blank HX9158-01R contained a film of residues after evaporation

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027): Negative weights observed, see comments below

Maxxam # Filter Condition

HX9157-01R Normal

HX9159-01R Normal

HX9160-01R FT

HX9161-01R Normal

HX9162-01R Normal

Normal Filters received in normal condition

FT Filter torn

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.07

P.O. #:

Project name: JM RICHMOND



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0G8002

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2337916 NUA Method Blank < 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse 2010/11/30 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2339500 MGE Spiked Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/25 95 % 70

- 130

Spiked Blank DUP Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/25 93 % 70

- 130

RPD Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/25 2.4 % 20

Method Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/25 ND, RDL=1.0 mg

2343448 MGE Method Blank Inorganic Condensible PM 2010/11/29 ND, RDL=0.50 mg

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Page 6 of 6

### Your Project #: 10-3990.07

Site: JM RICHMOND

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/12/06



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0G8018

Received: 2010/11/22, 14:00

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 4

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ( 1 ) 4 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 BRL SOP-00103/ BRL EPA 6020 / M29

SOP-00102

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) ( 1 ) 4 2010/11/23 2010/11/26 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) ( 1 ) 4 N/A 2010/11/25 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315/NJATM1

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/11/25

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 1 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8018 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/06 Project name: JM RICHMOND



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H X 9 3 2 4 H

X 9 3 2 5 H

X 9 3 2 6 H

X 9 3 2 7

Sampling Date 2010/11/18 2010/11/17 2010/11/18 2010/11/18

U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 2-M5/29 3-M5/29

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 1.6 0.9 1.6 0.5 2338097

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg ND ND ND ND 0.30 2339642

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 83 92 61 54 1 2338099

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8018 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/06 Project name: JM RICHMOND



### ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H X 9 3 2 4 H

X 9 3 2 5 H

X 9 3 2 5 H

X 9 3 2 6 H

X 9 3 2 7

Sampling Date 2010/11/18 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 2010/11/18 2010/11/18

U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RDL RUN RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 1-M5/29 2-M5/29 3-M5/29

Lab-Dup

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 0.40 ND ND ND ND 0.80 2347965

Total Arsenic (As) ug 1.08 0.40 ND ND 0.91 1.08 0.80 2347965

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND ND 0.20 2347965

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug 0.25 0.10 0.28 0.31 0.54 ND 0.20 2347965

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 1.26 0.30 4.13 4.42 2.77 2.15 0.60 2347965

Total Cobalt (Co) ug ND 0.10 1.06 1.10 1.81 ND 0.20 2347965

Total Lead (Pb) ug 1.01 0.20 6.58 6.91 11.4 1.57 0.40 2347965

Total Manganese (Mn) ug 1.01 0.75 4.1 4.2 18.9 2.1 1.5 2347965

Total Nickel (Ni) ug ND 0.50 4.1 4.3 6.2 2.3 1.0 2347965

Total Selenium (Se) ug ND 1.0 2.2 2.8 5.4 5.0 2.0 2347965

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8018 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/06 Project name: JM RICHMOND



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HX9324 Collected 2010/11/18

Sample ID BLANK-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2347965 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2338097 2010/11/23 2010/11/26 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2339642 N/A 2010/11/25 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2338099 N/A 2010/11/25 NUA

Maxxam ID HX9325 Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2347965 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2338097 2010/11/23 2010/11/26 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2339642 N/A 2010/11/25 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2338099 N/A 2010/11/25 NUA

Maxxam ID HX9325 D u p Collected 2010/11/17

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2347965 2010/12/03 2010/12/03 N_R

Maxxam ID HX9326 Collected 2010/11/18

Sample ID RUN 2-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2347965 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2338097 2010/11/23 2010/11/26 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2339642 N/A 2010/11/25 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2338099 N/A 2010/11/25 NUA

Maxxam ID HX9327 Collected 2010/11/18

Sample ID RUN 3-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/22

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2347965 2010/12/02 2010/12/03 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2338097 2010/11/23 2010/11/26 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2339642 N/A 2010/11/25 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2338099 N/A 2010/11/25 NUA

Page 4 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G8018 Client Project #: 10-3990.07

Report Date: 2010/12/06 Project name: JM RICHMOND

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201): Negative weights observed

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Metals in Combined Train (6020): Extra 2x dilution was required for all samples except HX9324, due to the matrix.

Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample HX9325.

Trace level As was observed in the Processed Blank.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.07

P.O. #:

Project name: JM RICHMOND



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0G8018

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2338097 NUA Method Blank Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone 2010/11/26 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2347965 N_R Matrix Spike

(HX9325) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/12/03 99 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HX9325) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/12/03 98 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/12/03 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HX9325) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/12/03 95 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HX9325) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/12/03 91 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/12/03 4.3 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HX9325) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/12/03 93 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HX9325) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/12/03 92 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/12/03 1.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HX9325) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/12/03 94 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HX9325) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/12/03 92 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/12/03 2.2 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HX9325) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/12/03 101 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HX9325) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/12/03 98 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/12/03 3.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HX9325) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/12/03 102 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HX9325) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/12/03 97 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/12/03 5.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HX9325) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/12/03 104 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HX9325) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/12/03 103 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/12/03 1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HX9325) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/12/03 103 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HX9325) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/12/03 102 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/12/03 1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HX9325) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/12/03 100 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HX9325) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/12/03 95 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/12/03 5.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HX9325) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/12/03 93 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HX9325) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/12/03 89 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/12/03 4.4 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/12/03 98 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/12/03 97 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/12/03 0.7 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/12/03 97 % 85

- 115

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 6 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.07

P.O. #:

Project name: JM RICHMOND



### Quality Assurance Report

(Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0G8018

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2347965 N_R Spiked Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/12/03 97 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/12/03 0.7 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/12/03 98 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/12/03 98 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/12/03 0.7 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/12/03 96 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/12/03 95 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/12/03 1.2 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/12/03 96 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/12/03 100 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/12/03 3.9 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/12/03 101 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/12/03 101 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/12/03 0.6 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/12/03 102 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/12/03 100 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/12/03 1.8 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/12/03 99 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/12/03 100 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/12/03 0.9 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/12/03 99 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/12/03 99 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/12/03 0.7 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/12/03 97 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/12/03 98 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/12/03 1.5 % 20

Method Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/12/03 0.86, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/12/03 0.84, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/12/03 0.84, RDL=0.50 ug

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/12/03 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 7 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.07

P.O. #:

Project name: JM RICHMOND



### Quality Assurance Report

(Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0G8018

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2347965 N_R RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

RPD

- Sample/Sample

Dup Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Total Arsenic (As) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/12/03 6.7 % 20

Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/12/03 4.4 % 20

Total Lead (Pb) 2010/12/03 4.9 % 20

Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Total Selenium (Se) 2010/12/03 NC % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 8 of 8

### Ohio Lumex Co., Inc.

9263 Ravenna Rd., Unit A-3

Twinsburg, OH 44087

Phone: (330) 405-0837

Fax: (330) 405-0847

www.ohiolumex.com

Other



## Client Name 

# BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. Report Number BTEnvironmental120310 Report 1 of 2



## Date 

# 12/3/2010

Contact Name Phone (248)-548-8072

**Trap I.D. Test Location**  **Date Analyzed Scientist**  **Mass ng**

**Sect.1 Mass ng** 

**Sect.2 Spike** 

**Level Date(s) in** 

**Stack Comments** 

80276 Kansas City 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 43.9 0.16 11/8/2010 K2 Furnace, Run 1, Trap A

80462 Kansas City 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 64.2 0.02 20 11/8/2010 K2 Furnace, Run 1, Trap B

80493 Kansas City 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 43.9 0 11/8/2010 K2 Furnace, Run 2, Trap A

80474 Kansas City 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 61.8 0.18 20 11/8/2010 K2 Furnace, Run 2, Trap B

80490 Kansas City 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 47.9 0.64 11/8/2010 K2 Furnace, Run 3, Trap A

70639 Kansas City 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 58.8 0 20 11/8/2010 K2 Furnace, Run 3, Trap B

80275 Kansas City 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 0.47 0.31 K2 Furnace, Blank

80452 Kansas City 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 20.1 0.26 20 K2 Furnace, Blank

80340 Melt Furnace 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 379 0.59 11/16/2010 Run 1, Trap A

70859 Melt Furnace 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 403 0.83 20 11/16/2010 Run 1, Trap B

80322 Melt Furnace 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 381 0 11/16/2010 Run 2, Trap A

80270 Melt Furnace 12/1/2010 Matt Carhart 406 1.10 20 11/16/2010 Run 2, Trap B

80266 Melt Furnace 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 372 0.82 11/16/2010 Run 3, Trap A

70864 Melt Furnace 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 399 0.65 20 11/16/2010 Run 3, Trap B

80298 Melt Furnace 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 0 0.04 Blank

80291 Melt Furnace 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 20.3 0.21 20 Blank

82389 Waterville, OH 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 0.70 0.64 11/16/2010 Units 29&30 Osprey, Run 1, Trap A

80399 Waterville, OH 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 20.0 0.79 20 11/16/2010 Units 29&30 Osprey, Run 1, Trap B

80333 Waterville, OH 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 1.02 0 11/16/2010 Units 29&30 Osprey, Run 2, Trap A

70845 Waterville, OH 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 21.3 0.26 20 11/16/2010 Units 29&30 Osprey, Run 2, Trap B

Variability +- 10% Turn - Around Time

Standard

48 hour rush

Less than .257 ng is considered "< LDL." Which is less

than the lowest detection limit. 

## Plant/Source 

# Sorbent Trap Analysis Report

Calibration Report Available Barry Boulianne bboulianne@sbcglobal.net Matthew Smith

msmith@btecinc.com 

# Certain Teed, JM Richmond, Johns Manville

### Ohio Lumex Co., Inc.

9263 Ravenna Rd., Unit A-3

Twinsburg, OH 44087

Phone: (330) 405-0837

Fax: (330) 405-0847

www.ohiolumex.com

Other



## Client Name 

# BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. Report Number BTEnvironmental120310 Report 2 of 2



## Date 

# 12/3/2010

Contact Name Phone (248)-548-8072

**Trap I.D. Test Location**  **Date Analyzed Scientist**  **Mass ng**

**Sect.1 Mass ng** 

**Sect.2 Spike** 

**Level Date(s) in** 

**Stack Comments** 

80302 Waterville, OH 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 0.51 0 11/17/2010 Units 29&30 Osprey, Run 3, Trap A

82423 Waterville, OH 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 20.5 0.06 20 11/17/2010 Units 29&30 Osprey, Run 3, Trap B

82355 Waterville, OH 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 0.44 0.82 11/17/2010 Units 29&30 Osprey, Blank, Trap A

82420 Waterville, OH 12/2/2010 Matt Carhart 21.1 0 20 11/17/2010 Units 29&30 Osprey, Blank, Trap B

Variability +- 10% Barry Boulianne bboulianne@sbcglobal.net Matthew Smith

msmith@btecinc.com 

# Certain Teed, JM Richmond, Johns Manville Plant/Source 

# Sorbent Trap Analysis Report

Calibration Report Available

Less than .257 ng is considered "< LDL." Which is less

than the lowest detection limit. Turn - Around Time

Standard

48 hour rush