alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4870 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4870

To establish certain rules for Surface Transportation Board approval of 
     waste management company applications to become rail carriers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 2006

  Mrs. Kelly introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To establish certain rules for Surface Transportation Board approval of 
     waste management company applications to become rail carriers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINAL DECISION.

    The decision of the Surface Transportation Board in its Docket 
Number 34734 shall be the final decision regarding the application of 
Northeast Interchange Railway with respect to the rail line in Croton-
on-Hudson, New York.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON CERTAIN WASTE TRANSPORTATION APPLICATIONS.

    The Surface Transportation Board shall not approve a lease and 
operation exemption application, by a company operating less than 1,700 
feet of track, for the purpose of hauling waste unless the Surface 
Transportation Board has conducted a public hearing in the jurisdiction 
normally exercising regulatory control over the transportation of 
waste.

SEC. 3. MAJORITY VOTE.

    The Surface Transportation Board shall not approve a lease and 
operation exemption application by a company for the purpose of hauling 
waste without a majority vote of the full Surface Transportation Board.

SEC. 4. COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL LAW.

    (a) In General.--The Surface Transportation Board shall require a 
company that becomes a rail carrier (within the meaning of section 
10102(5) of title 49, United States Code) for the purpose of hauling 
waste to comply with all applicable State and local zoning laws.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) shall take effect 30 days after 
the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-6447.

#### Scott L. Ellison, Petitioner v. Anthony Padula, Warden.

565 U.S. 1064, 132 S. Ct. 765,

181 L. Ed. 2d 492,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8495.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 182.
No. 09-7252.

#### Gregory May, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1009, 130 S. Ct. 1880,

176 L. Ed. 2d 369,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2602.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 339 Fed. Appx. 149.
No. 11-6915.

#### Clarence Allen Torres, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1044, 132 S. Ct. 599,

181 L. Ed. 2d 439,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8122.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 439 Fed. Appx. 241.
No. 09-6127.

#### Rickey Hawthorne, Petitioner v. Patricia L. Caruso, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections, et al.

559 U.S. 964, 130 S. Ct. 1572,

176 L. Ed. 2d 155,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1047.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 995, 130 S. Ct. 499, 175 L. Ed. 2d 354, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 7831.
No. 09-751.

#### Albert Snyder, Petitioner v. Fred W. Phelps, Sr., et al.

559 U.S. 990, 130 S. Ct. 1737,

176 L. Ed. 2d 211,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2280.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit granted.

Same case below, 580 F.3d 206.
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Maximum Dynamics, Inc. a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Joshua Wolcott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Maximum Dynamics, Inc., and will be retained by Maximum Dynamics,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


/s/ Joshua Wolcott
--------------------------
Joshua Wolcott
Chief Financial Officer
May 18, 2004
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA

No. 17

– 1351

Johnson County No. FECR115064

IMPROVIDENT GRANT ORDER

STATE OF IOWA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs.

STEPHON TRAVELL CURRY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

Upon further consideration of this case, the court, McDonald, J., taking no part,

concludes further review was improvidently granted and, therefore, rescinds the order of

March 28, 2019, granting further review.

Copies to:

Brenda Jean Gohr

Assistant Appellate Defender

Fourth Floor Lucas Building

Des Moines, IA 50319

Kevin Cmelik

Israel J. Kodiaga

Assistant Attorneys General

Criminal Appeals Division

Hoover State Office Building, 2nd Floor

Des Moines, IA 50319

– 0106
EXHIBIT 10.2


 


GUARANTORS’ RATIFICATION


 


The undersigned Guarantors hereby reaffirm
their continuing obligations under the terms of the certain Guaranty and Suretyship Agreement dated June 22, 2012 (as amended,
restated, replaced and/or modified from time to time, the “Guaranty”), and acknowledge that (i) they have read the
Third Amendment to Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Security Agreement, (ii) the Obligations under the Revolving Credit, Term Loan
and Security Agreement dated June 22, 2012, as has been and is being and may further be amended, restated, modified and/or extended
from time to time, are secured by their Guaranty, and (iii) they make such reaffirmation with full knowledge of the terms thereof.


 








	ATTEST:	 	HUDSON HOLDINGS, INC.
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Stephen P. Mandracchia	 	By:	/s/ Brian F. Coleman
	Name: 	STEPHEN P. MANDRACCHIA	 	 	Name:	BRIAN F. COLEMAN
	Title:	Secretary	 	 	Title:	President
	 	 	 	 
	ATTEST:	 	HUDSON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Stephen P. Mandracchia	 	By:	/s/ Brian F. Coleman
	Name:	STEPHEN P. MANDRACCHIA	 	 	Name:	BRIAN F. COLEMAN
	Title: 	Secretary	 	 	Title:	President


 


 


Dated: July 1, 2014
No. 09-8108.

#### James Parmer, Petitioner v. Idaho Correctional Corporation, et al.

559 U.S. 950, 130 S. Ct. 1532,

176 L. Ed. 2d 131,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1431.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Pickering

by the Supreme Court except on petition for review"). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED. rig Saitta 

# Pitt U '

AP J.

cc: Hon. Robert Lane, District Court Judge Hyrum Joseph West Attorney General/Carson City Nye County District Attorney Nye County Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A exo
BOARP: BOARD: Paul C. Aughrry, III 

# D H E C Henry C. Scott Chairman Edwin H. Cooper, III Vice Chairman

# ~-~ PROMOTE PROTECT PROSPER M. David Mitchell, MD
Glenn A. McCall Steven G. Kisner Secretary C. Earl Hunter, Commissionet Coleman F. Buckhouse, MD Promotingandprotecting the health of thepublicandthe t'nuironmem

November 29,2010

Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming Regional Administrator Director SuperfundDivision U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency Region 4 61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta, GA 30303-3104

Subject: U.S. Finishing/Cone Mills Site SCD003358744 Greenville County, South Carolina

Dear Ms. Fleming:

Pursuantto the November 2,2010 letter from Franklin E. Hill, Director, Superfund Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Region IV, to Daphne Neel, Bureau Chief, Bureau of Land and Waste Management, South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC), SCDHEC concurs with USEPA moving forward with listing ofthe U.S. Finishing/Cone Mills site in Greenville County on the National Priorities List (NPL) ofFederal Superfund Sites.
It is the SCDHEC's beliefthat the current condition ofthe U.S. Finishing/Cone Mills site poses considerable threat to public health and the environment for the State of South Carolina. Numerous areas ofcontamination still exist at the site including surface impoundments, soil and subsurface soil contamination, a significant groundwater contaminant plume and contaminated sediments in Langston Creek and the Reedy River. Due to the nature in which the operating company left the site, other potential threats to human health and the environment remain at the site. According to USEPA, the site qualifies for proposal to the NPL based uponthe score ofthe Hazard Ranking System (HRS) package completed for the site. Therefore, SCDHEC fully supports USEPA's efforts to proceed with the NPL listing process for this site. Further, SCDHEC encourages making appropriate areas ofthis site available for possible redevelopment
as expeditiously as possible.

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL 2600BullStreet·Columbia,SC29201 •Phone: (803) 898-3432 •www.scdhec.govPlease also allow this letter to serve as my designation of G. Kendall Taylor, Director, Site Assessment, Remediation and Revitalization Division, SCDHEC, as South Carolina's official contact for the USEPA concurrence on the listing ofthis NPL site in our state, as well as any future corr pondenceregarding e site.

Robert W. King, Jr. Deputy Commissioner Environmental Quality Control South CarolinaDepartment ofHealth and Environmental Control

CC: FranklinE. Hill, Superfund Division, USEPA, Region IV DaphneNeel, Bureau Chief, BLWM, SCDHEC G. Kendall Taylor, BLWM SusanTurner, Region 2 EQC Van Keisler, BLWM
COURT OF APPEALS

Thirteenth District

Corpus Christi

- Edinburg, Texas

Below is the JUDGMENT in the numbered cause set out herein to be Filed and Entered in the Minutes of the Court of Appeals, Thirteenth District of Texas, at Corpus

Christi

- Edinburg , as of the 3rd day of October, 2013

. If this Judgment does not conform to the opinion handed down by the Court in this cause, any party may file a Motion for Correction of Judgment with the Clerk of this Court.

CAUSE NO. 13

- 12

- 00604

- CR (Tr.Ct.No. CR

- 53 05

- 10

- E)

JAMES DARYLL LAWRENCE SCOTT, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal to this Court from Hidalgo County, Texas.

* * * * * * *



## JUDGMENT

On appeal from the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas , from a judgment signed Au gust 28, 2012 . Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Valdez. Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

THIS CAUSE was submitted to the Court on October 1, 2013, on t he record and appellant ’ s brief . These having been examined and fully considered, it is the opini on of

the Court that there was some error in the judgment of the court below, and said judgment is hereby AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

* * * * * * * DORIAN RAMIREZ, CLERK
1

AGENDA

February 10, 2015

12:30 – 2:00 PM (Eastern Time)

Call in number: 1-866-299-3188/Code 919-541-5676#

Pre-Meeting Conference Call for the March 3 & 4

EPA-FLM-RPO-States-Tribes Meeting on the Future of the Regional Haze 

Program

1. Roll call.

2. Purpose of this call.

3. Confirm the purpose of the March 3 & 4 meeting.

4. Confirm attendees and the mechanism for getting pre-meeting information to them. This will 

include revised agenda/questions and information on security procedures, for example.

5. Acknowledge any input already received on the draft pre-meeting materials.

6. Get reactions/modify the high-level, 2-page agenda.

7. Discuss how discussion should flow and be facilitated at the meeting.

8. EPA answers any clarifying questions about the detailed questions. This may lead to suggestions 

for re-phrasing or for removing questions.

9. Gauge interest in one or more additional pre-meeting calls, to provide more detailed description 

of the three analytical approaches referred to in Question 6 on page 3 of the “GUIDANCE 

TOPICS” handout.

10. Suggestions for additional topics or questions.

11. Plans to send out revised pre-meeting materials and possibly a short window for comment on 

those.

12. Other questions or requests.
# C_2017341EN.01000102.xml

| 12.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 341/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 341/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8585 — Axis/Novae)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 341/02)

On 5 October 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8585. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8585. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
**Exhibit23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration StatementNos. 333-49138, 033-22977, 33-22977, and 33-89930 on Form S-8 of our reportsdated June 22, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements of MAIRHoldings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) (which report expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to Mesaba Aviation, Inc.,a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, filing for reorganization underChapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on October 13, 2005 and to therestatement of the fiscal 2005 and 2004 consolidated statements of operations),and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for theyear ended March 31, 2006.

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota

June 22, 2006

 

 

 

 

----
# C_2017444EN.01000101.xml

| 23.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 444/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 444/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 15 December 2017

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of the European Central Bank

(ECB/2017/42)

(2017/C 444/01)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | The mandate of the ECB’s current external auditors, Ernst & Young GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, will end after the audit for the financial year 2017. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2018. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of the ECB’s current external auditors, Ernst & Young GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, will end after the audit for the financial year 2017. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2018.

| (3) | The ECB has selected Baker Tilly GmbH & Co. KG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft as its external auditors for the financial years 2018 to 2022, with an option to extend the mandate for up to two additional financial years (i.e. to 2023 or to 2024), |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The ECB has selected Baker Tilly GmbH & Co. KG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft as its external auditors for the financial years 2018 to 2022, with an option to extend the mandate for up to two additional financial years (i.e. to 2023 or to 2024),

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that Baker Tilly GmbH & Co. KG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft should be appointed as the external auditors of the ECB for the financial years 2018 to 2022, with an option to extend the mandate for up to two additional financial years (i.e. to 2023 or to 2024).

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 15 December 2017.

The President of the ECB

Mario DRAGHI

---
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no

precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of wellsettled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens

on the legal profession." Pursuant to that rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 93-2459

Summary Calendar

_______________

CLYDE URA CAIN, SR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

HEARST CORPORATION,

d/b/a The Houston Chronicle,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(CA-H-93-614)

_________________________

(August 31, 1994)

Before GARWOOD, SMITH, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We certified to the Supreme Court the question of whether

Texas recognizes the false light doctrine. That court answered in

the negative. See Cain v. Hearst Corp., No. D-4171, 1994 Tex.

LEXIS 122 (Tex. June 22, 1994).
2

The only cause of action the instant plaintiff advances is not

recognized in Texas. The judgment, accordingly, is AFFIRMED.
No. 09-883.

#### Valery V. Ceasar, Petitioner v. Nancy A. Nord, Commissioner, Consumer Product Safety Commission, et al.

559 U.S. 974, 130 S. Ct. 1719,

176 L. Ed. 2d 185,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2110.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 332 Fed. Appx. 98.
# C_2016417EN.01001104.xml

| 11.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 417/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 417/11

---

SESAR JOINT UNDERTAKING

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2015

(2016/C 417/43)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.sesarju.eu/newsroom/brochures-publications

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. §1350

In connection with the quarterly report of Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William B. Olson, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.

Date:
March 12, 2010



/S/ WILLIAM B. OLSONWilliam B. OlsonChief Financial Officer and Treasurer