alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

| March 19, 2010

  | By: /s/ | Michael S. Smith                    |   |
|----------------------------------|--------------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
| (Date)

                    |         | Michael S. Smith

President

  |   |

 

 

 

 

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 140 (Thursday, July 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 43659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18634]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 10-11 a.m.

PLACE: Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public

Matters To Be Considered:
    Decisional Matters: 1. Phthalates Enforcement Policy; 2. Phthalates 
Notice of Requirements.
    A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at http://www.cpsc.gov/webcast.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: July 19, 2011.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-18634 Filed 7-19-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
No. 09-8906.

#### Claudio Millan, Petitioner v. Southern California Edison Company.

559 U.S. 1017, 130 S. Ct. 1908,

176 L. Ed. 2d 383,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2551,

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4550]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,280]


Eaton Corporation, Mentor, OH; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 18, 2009 in response to a 
worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of 
Eaton Corporation, Mentor, Ohio.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of February 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-4550 Filed 3-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 13.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Estre Ambiental, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2018 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 15, 2019



By:

/s/ Felipe RodriguezName:

Felipe RodriguezTitle:

Interim Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, and is not being filed either as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement, and is not to be incorporated by reference into the Report or any other filing of the Company, whether made before or after the
date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. The foregoing certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject
to the liabilities of Section 18 or Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
  PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lorrie Ann Archibald, Chief Executive Officer of Merritt
  Ventures Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
  2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                  

| | By:    | /s/ Lorrie Ann Archibald
| | ------ | ------------------------
| |        |                         
| | Name:  | LORRIE ANN ARCHIBALD    
| |        |                         
| | Title: | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
| |        |                         
| | Date:  | November 13, 2003       

---
No. 11-7470.

#### Germaine A. Elcock, Petitioner v. Lance Whitecotton, et al.

565 U.S. 1167, 132 S. Ct. 1114,

181 L. Ed. 2d 996,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 811.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 434 Fed. Appx. 541.
Exhibit 32.2



                                  CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, the undersigned  officer of ING USA Annuity
and Life  Insurance  Company  (the  "Company")  hereby  certifies  that,  to the
officer's knowledge, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d), as applicable,  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



March 17, 2005                             By /s/  Harry N. Stout
--------------                                ----------------------------------
    (Date)                                         Harry N. Stout
                                                   President
EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT


We  consent  to  the   incorporation  by  reference  in  C-Phone   Corporation's
registration  statement on Form S-8 (registration  no.  33-95306),  registration
statement on Form S-3 (registration no. 333-25273) and registration statement on
Form S-3 (registration no. 333-46309) of our report dated May 8, 1998, except as
to the information  presented in Note 14, for which the date is May 15, 1998, on
our audits of the financial statements of C-Phone Corporation as of February 28,
1998 and 1997,  and for the three years in the period  ended  February 28, 1998,
which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.




Raleigh, North Carolina
May 28, 1998



                                       29
# C_2017255EN.01000301.xml

| 5.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8539 — KPS/Dexko)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 255/05)

On 10 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8539. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8539. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
No. 11-188.

#### Margaret A. Quinn, Petitioner v. Nafta Traders, Inc.

565 U.S. 963, 132 S. Ct. 455,

181 L. Ed. 2d 295,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7489.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Texas denied.

Same case below, 339 S.W.3d 84.
No. 11-7850.

#### Gustavo Moran-Martinez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1171, 132 S. Ct. 1127,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1005,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 685.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT DAVID J. DEJEU, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. W ASHINGTON STATE DEPARTM ENT OF LAB OR

AND INDUSTRIES, De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 13-36109 D.C . No. 3:13-c v-05401-R B L M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the W e ste rn Distric t of W a shington R o n a ld B . Le ighton, District Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2015 ** B e fore : TASHIM A , OW ENS, a nd FRIEDLAND, C irc uit Judge s. David J. De

je u a ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s orde r de ny ing his m otion to se t a s ide the judgm e nt dismissing his ac tion a lle ging c la im s re late d to W a shington sta

te ’ s re gistra

tion re quire m e nts for c ontra c tors. W e have jurisdic tion



# FIL ED DEC 02 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie wfor an a buse of disc re t ion the distric t c ourt’ s de nia l of a

Fe d. R . C iv. P. 60(b) m otion for re lie f from judgm e nt. Harman v . Harpe r , 7 F.3d 1455, 1458 (9th C ir. 1993). W e a ffirm . The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion by

de ny i ng De

je u’ s R u le 60(b) m otion be c a

use De je u fa ile d to de m onstra

te any ba sis for re lie f. Se e Sc h. Dist. N o. 1J , Multnomah C

ty ., Or. v . AC

andS, Inc
. , 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th C ir. 1993) (se tting forth grounds for re lie f from judgm e nt). To the e xte nt tha

t De j e u atte m pts to c ha lle nge the distric t c ourt’ s unde rly ing judgm e nt of dismissa l, we la c k jurisdic tion be c a use De je u did not time ly

file a notic e of a

ppe a l a s to theunde rly ing judgm e nt, or a post-judgme nt m otion tha t tolle d the tim e to file a

notic e of a

ppe a l a s to thejudgm e nt. S e e Fe d. R . App. P. 4(a )(1)(A) (notic e of a

ppe a l m u st be file d within 30 da

y s a fte r e ntry

of judgm e nt); Fe d. R . App. P. 4(a )(4)(A) (tim e for filing a notic e of a ppe a l m ay

be e x te nde d whe re pa rty tim e ly file s a n e num e rate d tolling m

otion); Bow le

s v . Russe ll , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007) (“ [T] he tim e l y filing of a notic e of a

ppe a l in a c ivil c a se is a jurisdic tiona l re quire m e nt .” ). AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 3 6 1 0 9 2
Montana Twenty Second Judicial District Court. County of Carbon.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- PERRY L. BURNETT, JR., Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-14-048

DECISION

On May 25, 2016, the Court sentenced the Defendant for violation of the conditions of probation, to a commitment of five (5) years in a prison designated by the Department of Corrections, with none of that time suspended for the offense of Count I: Failure to Register as a Sexual Offender, a Felony, in violation of §46-23-504, MCA. The Court granted credit for time served in the amount of eight (8) days. The Court did not grant credit for street time. Further, the Court ordered that the Defendant be restricted from parole for five (5) years. The Court found the imposition of a parole restriction appropriate for reasons subsequently enumerated in the sentence and judgment.

On November 17, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Adam Cook, a third year law student under the supervision of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

*99Done in open Court this 17th day of November, 2016.

DATED this 8th day of December, 2016.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sturgis Bancorp, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian
P. Hoggatt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|                     |  |                                          
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Date August 13, 2003 |  | /s/ Brian P. Hoggatt                     
|                     |  |                                          
|                     |  | Brian P. Hoggatt, Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-8624.

#### Laura A. Jennings, Petitioner v. Sallie Mae, Inc.

559 U.S. 983, 130 S. Ct. 1715,

176 L. Ed. 2d 199,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1944.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 358 Fed. Appx. 719.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-2257

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Tevonta Reair Tiller

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Western

 ____________

 Submitted: January 11, 2021

Filed: January 22, 2021

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Tevonta Tiller appeals after he pleaded guilty to bank robbery and a firearm

offense, and the district court1 sentenced him below the Guidelines range. His counsel

1The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa.
has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), arguing that Tiller’s conviction and sentence should be vacated due to

vindictive prosecution. 

Upon careful review, we conclude that Tiller did not demonstrate that the

government vindictively prosecuted him. See United States v. Williams, 793 F.3d

957, 963-64 (8th Cir. 2015) (defendant bears heavy burden to demonstrate vindictive

prosecution); United States v. Chappell, 779 F.3d 872, 880 (8th Cir. 2015)

(presumption of regularity supports prosecutorial decisions absent clear, contrary

evidence).

We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75 (1988), and we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we

affirm, and we grant counsel’s motions to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. §1350

In connection with the quarterly
report of Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Alan P.
Niedzwiecki, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.

Date: March 12, 2009



/S/ ALAN P. NIEDZWIECKIAlan P. NiedzwieckiPresident and Chief Executive Officer
No. 09-7897.

#### David G. Schoor, Petitioner v. Texas.

559 U.S. 945, 130 S. Ct. 1515,

176 L. Ed. 2d 123,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1283.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, denied.

Same case below, 279 S.W.3d 844.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7338** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. OMAR JERMEL DIXON, a/k/a O Dixon, a/k/a Omar Dixon

- El, a/k/a Omar Jermel Dixon

- El, a/k/a Omar Germal Dixon, a/k/ a Omar Jermal Dixon, a/k/a Omar Jermal Dixon El , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. ( 3:02

- cr - 00209

- JRS

- 1 )

Submitted : A pril 14, 2011 Decided: April 28, 2011

Before MOTZ and KEENAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Omar Jermel Dixon, Appellant Pro Se. Brian R. Hood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Omar Jermel Dixon appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction of sentence based on the crack co caine Guidelines Amendments . The district court found that Dixon had been held responsible for more than 4.5 kilograms of crack cocaine at his original sentencing and was therefore ineligible for a reduction. We hold that the district court’s ruling was not an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Woods , 581 F.3d 531, 539 (7th Cir. 2009) (holding that “ a finding that the defendants were responsible for at least 4.5 kilograms is not inconsistent with the conclusion of the original sentencing court tha t the defendants were responsible for amou nts in excess of 1.5 kilograms”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the cou rt and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED