alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Krystal Biotech, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: March 12, 2019 |   | By:    | /s/ Antony A. Riley                                              |
|----------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   |   | Antony A. Riley                                                       |
|                 |   |   | Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
No. 09-9216.

#### Vernon Cooks, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1024, 130 S. Ct. 1930,

176 L. Ed. 2d 397,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2520.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 589 F.3d 173.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 39 (Monday, March 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4436]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Sunshine Federal Register Notice

Agency Holding the Meetings:  Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

DATES: Week of March 2, 2009.

Place:  Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, Maryland.

Status:  Public and Closed.

Additional Items to be Considered: 

Week of March 2, 2009

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

    2:45 p.m. Discussion of Security Issues (Closed--Ex. 1).
* * * * *
    * The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on 
short notice. To verify the status of meetings, call (recording)--(301) 
415-1292. Contact person for more information: Rochelle Bavol, (301) 
415-1651.
* * * * *
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at: http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policy-making/schedule.html.
* * * * *
    The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with 
disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation 
to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or 
the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another 
format (e.g. braille, large print), please notify the NRC's Disability 
Program Coordinator, Rohn Brown, at 301-492-2279, TDD: 301-415-2100, or 
by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#42302d2a2c6c20302d352c022c30216c252d34"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1d6f727573337f6f726a735d736f7e337a726b">[email protected]</span></a>. Determinations on requests for 
reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis.
* * * * *
    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the 
distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, 
DC 20555 (301-415-1969). In addition, distribution of this meeting 
notice over the Internet system is available. If you are interested in 
receiving this Commission meeting schedule electronically, please send 
an electronic message to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2440455648414a410a53564d434c50644a56470a434b52"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e581849789808b80cb92978c828d91a58b9786cb828a93">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: February 25, 2009.
Rochelle C. Bavol,
Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-4436 Filed 2-26-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 11-7557.

#### Vanessa D. Willis, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1134, 132 S. Ct. 1060,

181 L. Ed. 2d 777,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 91.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 437 Fed. Appx. 269.
Exhibit 4.22
 ALION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
2004 STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS PLAN
(as amended and restated effective January 1, 2007)
 ARTICLE I
GENERAL
 Plan Name
 Purpose
 Effective Date; Term th
 Shares Subject to the Plan




---



##### 



ARTICLE II
DEFINITIONS
           2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



Person Group
        4




---



##### 



bona fide bona fide bona fide bona fide
  ARTICLE III
ADMINISTRATION
 General
  5




---



##### 



Procedure
 Duties
       Delegation of Authority
  6




---



##### 



Limited Liability
 Indemnification
 Effect of Administrative Committees Decision
 ARTICLE IV
ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATION
 Eligibility
 Participation
 ARTICLE V
STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS
 Award of SARs ab initio
  7




---



##### 



Amount of Payment Upon Maturation of SARs Change in Control
 Payment of SARs
 Election to Defer Benefits Deferred Compensation Plan
  8




---



##### 



Disqualified Persons
 Termination and Forfeiture of Awards
 Termination of Employment
 Death or Disability
 Change in Control
 Termination for Cause
 Nontransferability
 Acceleration of Payment Date
 Compliance with Domestic Relations Order
 Conflicts of Interest
 Payment of Employment Taxes
  9




---



##### 



Section 409(p)
 Tax Event
 Delay of Payments
 Payments Subject to the Deduction Limitation
 Violation of Law
 Other Permitted Event
 Compliance with Code Section 409A
 ARTICLE VI
TRANSACTIONS
 Adjustment of Number and Price of Shares
  10




---



##### 



Adjustments Due to Special Circumstances
 Compliance with Code Section 409A
 ARTICLE VII
AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION
 Amendment
 Termination
 ARTICLE VIII
MISCELLANEOUS
 Restrictive Legends
 Compliance with Governmental Regulations
  11




---



##### 



Company Charter and Bylaws
 No Trust or Fund Created
 No Guarantee of Employment
 No Limit on Other Compensation Arrangements
 Governing Law
 Severability
  12




---



##### 



Identity
 Incompetence
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 Alion Science and Technology CorporationBy:
    
    /s/ Bahman Atefi

Chief Executive Officer
  13
No. 11-7183.

#### Eric Flores, Petitioner v. Public Health Service, et al.

565 U.S. 1125, 132 S. Ct. 1032,

181 L. Ed. 2d 760,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 18.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 09M84.

#### Norman B. Calvert, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1047, 130 S. Ct. 2366,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2954.

176 L. Ed. 2d 560,

April 5, 2010.

Motion for leave to proceed as a veteran denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4717 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4717

   To designate the National Museum of Wildlife Art, located at 2820 
Rungius Road, Jackson, Wyoming, as the National Museum of Wildlife Art 
                         of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2006

  Mrs. Cubin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the National Museum of Wildlife Art, located at 2820 
Rungius Road, Jackson, Wyoming, as the National Museum of Wildlife Art 
                         of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE UNITED STATES.

    (a) Designation.--The National Museum of Wildlife Art, located at 
2820 Rungius Road, Jackson, Wyoming, shall be known and designated as 
the ``National Museum of Wildlife Art of the United States''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the museum referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the National 
Museum of Wildlife Art of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         156,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,969
<ALLOWANCES>                                    53,158
<INVENTORY>                                  1,074,112
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,423,150
<PP&E>                                          65,059
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,488,209
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,054,614
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,700
<OTHER-SE>                                     734,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,488,209
<SALES>                                      1,410,277
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,505,749
<CGS>                                        1,094,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  489,359
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (91,892)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (91,892)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (91,892)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Maximum Dynamics, Inc. a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Eric Majors, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the
best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Maximum Dynamics, Inc., and will be retained by Maximum Dynamics,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


/s/ Eric Majors
--------------------------
Eric Majors
Chief Executive Officer
May 16, 2003
Exhibit 4.29
 RESOLUTIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO
THE ALION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
(effective November 1, 2008)
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 1.
    
    Section 2.7(b) of the Plan is amended by adding the following clause at the end thereof:
  2.
    
    A new Section 4.9 is added to the Plan to provide as follows:
 Limitation on Payment Based on Company Liquidity




---



##### 



3.
    
    A new Section 4.10 is added to the Plan to provide as follows:
 Special Rule for Certain Non-Vested Awards .
 FURTHER RESOLVED
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF nd
 ALION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
 By:
    
    /s/ Bahman AtefiIts: Chief Executive Officer
 Attest:
    
    /s/ Joshua Izenberg
  2
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (adopted pursuantto §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief FinancialOfficer of Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarterly period ended October 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperation of the Company.

 
| Date:  December 15, 2008 |                            |
|-----------------------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                                    |                            |
|                                    | /s/ Edward O. Irion             |
|                                    |                            |
|                                    | Edward O. Irion                 |
|                                    | * Chief Financial Officer* |

 

1

----
No. 09-9028.

#### James Lee Crummel, Petitioner v. Matthew Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

559 U.S. 1073, 130 S. Ct. 2101,

176 L. Ed. 2d 732,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3445.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 348 Fed. Appx. 219.
# C_2017299EN.01000102.xml

| 9.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 299/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 299/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8592 — Centerbridge/EGPH/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 299/02)

On 4 September 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8592. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8592. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
China Green Energy Industries, Inc.: Exhibit 10.53 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.53

Guaranty Obligations Pre-maturity Covenants between the Parties
Dispute Resolution Validity Acknowledgments by the Guarantors Summary of
Guaranty Contract of RMB 2,000,000, with a term of 2 years from March 19,2012 to
March 18,2014, between Changzhou Lijia Industrial Co., Ltd, and Jiangsu Wujin
Rural Commercial Bank, guaranteed by Changzhou City Wujin Best Electronic Cables
Co., Ltd., and WangYong.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 43 (Friday, March 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4771]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Withdrawal for Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental 
Impact Statement for the Rio Grande National Forest; Colorado; Wolf 
Creek Access Project

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On September 23, 2008, a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an 
Environmental Impact Statement for the Wolf Creek Access Project was 
published in the 73 FR 54786. This NOI is hereby rescinded because the 
project has been cancelled.

    Dated: February 12, 2009.
Dan S. Dallas,
Forest Supervisor/Center Manager.
 [FR Doc. E9-4771 Filed 3-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2397

SANDRA WEINSTEIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BELL ATLANTIC-VIRGINIA, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-1240-A) Submitted: May 28, 1999 Decided: October 22, 1999 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Due H. Tran, THE LAW OFFICE OF FELDER & TRAN, L.L.C., Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Keith Fischler, BELL ATLANTIC NETWORK SERVICES, INC., Arlington, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Sandra Weinstein appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order granting in part the Defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order and the appeal is premature. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 09-8286.

#### Franklin Leon Blige, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 952, 130 S. Ct. 1540,

176 L. Ed. 2d 135,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1468.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 09-527.

#### Jeffrey A. Beard, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al., Petitioners v. Brian Thomas.

559 U.S. 1025, 130 S. Ct. 1942,

176 L. Ed. 2d 399,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2463.

March 22, 2010.

Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 570 F.3d 105.
No. 09-768.

#### Robert D. Straley, Petitioner v. Utah Board of Pardons, et al.

559 U.S. 991, 130 S. Ct. 1737,

176 L. Ed. 2d 213,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2257,

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 582 F.3d 1208.
<PAGE>   1

                                                     Exhibit (10) (xix)



                                      March 17, 2000


Mr. Frederic M. Poses
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
American Standard Companies Inc.
One Centennial Avenue
Piscataway, New Jersey 08855

Dear Fred:

     This letter will serve to amend the letter agreement dated October 13,
1999 (the "Letter Agreement") between you and American Standard Companies Inc.
(the "Company") setting forth the terms of your employment with the Company,
and to confirm our recent conversation that, in lieu of the provisions in the
Letter Agreement relating to your participation in the Company's Annual
Incentive Plan and amounts payable to you thereunder for the years 2000 and
2001, you will for such periods be eligible for an Annual Incentive with a
target award of 130% of your base salary, subject to an annual maximum
potential payment under that Plan of $2.0 million. In all other respects, the
terms of the Letter Agreement remain unchanged.

     If the foregoing accurately reflects your understanding and is acceptable
to you, please sign this letter below in the space provided and return the
signed original to me. I have included a duplicate of this letter signed on
behalf of the Management Development and Nominating Committee for your records.


                              Management Development and Nominating Committee

                              By: Roger W. Parsons
                                  ----------------
                                  Chairman of the committee


Accepted and Agreed to:

/s/ Frederic M. Poses
    -----------------
    Frederic M. Poses
No. 09-8491.

#### Roberto Flores-Meraz, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 958, 130 S. Ct. 1556,

176 L. Ed. 2d 144,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1356.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 345 Fed. Appx. 961.