alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE>                                  5
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
           <S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,450
<SECURITIES>                                     4,475
<RECEIVABLES>                                      720
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,789
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,898
<PP&E>                                           2,669
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,639
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,503
<BONDS>                                            533
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,361
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,973
<SALES>                                          1,996
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,996
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,666
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  24
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,694)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,694)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,694)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.82)
        


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register: August 19, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 160)]
[Notices]               
[Page 51327-51328]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19au10-96]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

 
Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending August 7, 
2010

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49

[[Page 51328]]

U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing proceedings to enforce 
these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing 
of the application.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2010-0198.
    Date Filed: August 3, 2010.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: Mail Vote 642--Resolutions: 024a--Establishing Passenger 
Fares and Related Charges; 024e--Rules for Payment of Local Currency 
Fares (Memo 1578). Intended effective date: 1 December 2010.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-20577 Filed 8-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
#### William Lyons, Appellant, v. Fannie Lyons, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed April 21, 1926.

*Fee & Liddon*and *Angus Sumner,*for Appellant;

*Alto Adams,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

— It appearing by the record that the appellee named herein had died before this appeal was taken, it is considered and ordered that the appeal be and is dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
No. 10-1489.

#### Mai-Trang Thi Nguyen, Petitioner v. Starbucks Coffee Corporation.

565 U.S. 1076, 132 S. Ct. 808,

181 L. Ed. 2d 519,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8356.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 930, 132 S. Ct. 368, 181 L. Ed. 2d 234, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6786.
<PAGE>




                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Kiran Patel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Solectron Corporation on Form 10-K for the annual period ended August 29, 2003
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Solectron Corporation.


Date:   November 14, 2003


                           /S/ Kiran Patel
                           --------------------
                           Kiran Patel
                           Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-8546.

#### Dayne Racquim Boothe, Petitioner v. Florida.

559 U.S. 1011, 130 S. Ct. 1889,

176 L. Ed. 2d 373,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2714.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District, denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4768 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4768

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 777 Corporation Street in Beaver, Pennsylvania, as the ``Robert Linn 
                    Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROBERT LINN MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 777 Corporation Street in Beaver, Pennsylvania, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Robert Linn Memorial Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert 
Linn Memorial Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 20, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4768

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 777 Corporation Street in Beaver, Pennsylvania, as the ``Robert Linn 
                    Memorial Post Office Building''.
```
### MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 11

- 002 16

- CR Anthony WOODARD , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 290th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 20 09

- CR

- 11453

- B Honorable Melisa Skinner , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca S immons , Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Delivered and Filed: June 8, 2011
DISMISSED On April 13, 2011, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record within thirty days. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; see also Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174, 175

- 76 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, order). Appellant did not file an amended certification. The clerk’s record does not contain a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal; to the contrary, the trial court04

- 11

- 00216

- CR

- 2

- certification in the record states “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that defendant has no right of appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(a)(2). Accordingly, we dis miss the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d).
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
ex1033.htm


Exhibit 10.33


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1


TO


CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE







This Amendment No. 1 to the Convertible Promissory Note (this "Amendment") is executed as of March 11, 2012, by Sanomedics International Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Maker”); and CLSS Holdings, LLC ("Holder") to amend the Convertible Promissory Note dated March 10, 2011 (as amended) of the Maker in favor of the Holder (the "Note") with such Amendment to take effect as of the date hereof.







The Maker and the Holder desire to amend the Note and further agree as follows:







1.           Capitalized Terms.                                Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, all capitalized terms used in this Amendment have meanings ascribed to them in the Note and those definitions are incorporated by reference into this Note.







2.           The initial sentence of the Note shall be deleted and the following shall be substituted therefor:







“FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Sanomedics International Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Maker"), hereby promises to pay to the order of CLSS HOLDINGS LLC, a Florida limited liability company, or its assigns ("Holder") the principal sum of Three Hundred Sixty Seven Thousand Dollars ($367,000.00) together with interest as set forth below, on or by the earlier of such date hereinafter referred to as the "Maturity Date"): (i) an Event of Default (as defined herein); and (ii) October 1, 2012.”







3.           Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original as against the party whose signature appears thereon, and all of which shall together constitute one and the same instrument.  This Amendment shall become binding when one or more counterparts hereof, individually or taken together, shall bear the signatures of all the parties reflected hereon as the signatories.







4.           Third Parties.                                Except as specifically set forth or referred to herein, nothing herein express of implied is intended or shall be construed to confer upon or give to any person other than the parties hereto and their permitted successors or assigns, any claims, rights, remedies under or by reason of this Amendment.







5.           Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida applicable to agreements made and to be performed entirely within such State and the federal laws of the United States of America, without regard to the conflict of laws rules thereof.












IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the date set forth above.












Sanomedics International Holdings, Inc.,









	 	 	 	 	 
	
By: /s/ Keith Houlihan

	 	 	
 

	 
	
Name: Keith Houlihan

	 	 	
 

	 
	
Title:  President and by resolution of the members of the Board of Directors

	 	 	
 

	 



     

CLSS Holdings, LLC






	 	 	 	 	 
	
By: /s/ Craig Sizer

	 	 	
 

	 
	


Name:  Craig Sizer



	 	 	
 

	 
	


Title:    President
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 38 (Friday, February 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8940-8941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4369]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION


Notice: Sunshine Meeting

Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 74 FR 7893, Friday, 
February 20, 2009.

Previously Announced Time and Date of Meeting: Wednesday, February 25, 
2009, 10 a.m. Eastern Time.

Change in the Meeting: A Closed Session has been added, directly 
following the open session.

Matters To Be Considered

Closed Session

    Litigation Recommendation: Amicus Curiae Recommendation.

Contact Person for More Information: Stephen Llewellyn, Executive 
Officer on (202) 663-4070.


[[Page 8941]]


    This notice issued February 25, 2009.
Stephen Llewellyn,
Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. E9-4369 Filed 2-25-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on

Briefs F ebruary

4, 2003 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JACKI E LEE GRAY Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Maury County No. 11992; 11993; 12096 Robert L. Jones, Judge

No. M2002-00802-CCA-R3-CD - F iled September 4, 2003

On January 28, 2002, the

appella nt, Jackie Lee Gray , pleade d guilty

to two cou

nts of misdemeanor assault, one count of vandalism under $500, one count of public intoxication, and one count of resisting arrest. The judgments in the technical rec ord reflect that the appellant was ordered to serve an effective sent ence of

si x months inca

rcera ted and si x months on pr

obation f or his con victions. On August 6, 2002, this court granted the appellant’s motion to late-file a transcript of the evidence. On September 26, 2002, the Circuit Court of Maury County had not yet rec eived the transcript and thereforesent the technical record to the court. The appe llant now brings this appeal claiming that the trial court improperly or dered him to serve a portion of his sentence in jail. Bec ause the transcript of the sentenc ing hearing is not before this Court we have no choice but to affirm the judgmen t of the tr ial cour t. Tenn. R. App.P. 3 Appe al as of Right ; Judgme nt of the Tri al Court is

Affirme d. J E RR Y L. S MITH , J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which D AVID H. W ELLES and N ORMA M C G EE O GLE , JJ., joined. Wi ll ia m C . B ar ne s, Jr ., Co lu mb ia , T en ne ss ee , for ap pe ll an t, Ja ck ie Lee Gr ay. Paul G. Summ

ers, Atto rney Genera l & Repor ter; Kim R. Helper, Assistant Attorney Genera l; and Mike Bottoms, District Attorney Ge neral, for appellee, State of Tennessee

. OPINION Analy sis In its brief the State notes t hat the appellant discusses the facts of the case a nd includes citations to the re cord. Ho wever, despite this Court’s order granting the appellant’s motion to latefile the tran script, it

is not inclu ded in this

record . There fore, because the record of

the dispositive issues is incomplete, we must presume that the trial court’s decision is proper.-2-

When an appellant cha

llenge s his sente

nce, this Court should conduct a de novo review with a presumpt ion of cor rectne ss. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-401(d). Because there is no transcript included in the record “the proper course of action is for the Court to sua sponte presume that the trial court’s decision is correct when the rec or d is insuff ic ient to determine otherwise.” State v. Kern , 996 S.W.2d 84 2 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999); State v. Richardson , 875 S.W.2d 671, 674 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1993); State v. Cooper , 736 S.W.2d 125, 131 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1987). Conclusion Based on the foregoing , the judgment of the trial court is AFFI RMED.

___________________________________ JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

RICHARD D. MICKMAN,

Respondent

v.

ELAINE MICKMAN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 65 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of May, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
No. 09-8139.

#### Bruce Monroe Greer, Petitioner v. Cynthia Nelson, Warden.

559 U.S. 975, 130 S. Ct. 1693,

176 L. Ed. 2d 187,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2076,

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-3 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and
represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2017, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Drive Auto
Receivables Trust 2017-3 and Wilmington Trust, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Sandra M. BroderickName:

Sandra M. BroderickTitle:

EVP Head of OperationsDate:

March 30, 2018By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

Executive Vice President Capital Markets and TreasurerDate:

March 30, 2018
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 19

- 00143

- CR

JERONIMO MIGUEL CABRERA, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 5th District Court Cass County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018F00342

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Stevens2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Jeronimo Miguel Cabrera appeals his conviction of indecency with a child by sexual contact for which he was sentenced to twenty years ’ incarceration. 1 This case was tried with two companion cases that are the subject of other appeals pending before this Court. 2 Cabrera filed a single brief cov er ing his three appeals i n which he challenges the trial court ’ s determination of the outcry witness. The argument raised in this appeal is based exclusively on the argument brought before this Court in the companion appeal styled Cabrera v. State , cause number 06

- 19

- 00142

- CR. In our opinion of this date disposing of that appeal, we found that the trial court acted within its discretion in determining the outcry witness. For the reasons stated in that appeal, we overrule

Cabrera ’ s sole issue in this appeal.

We affirm the tria l court ’ s judgment.

Scott E. Stevens Justice

Date Submitted: February 11, 2020 Date Decided: February 12 , 2020

Do Not Publish

1 See T EX

. P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 21.11.

2 Cabrera also appeals his conviction of a second count of indecency with a child by sexual contact and his conviction of aggravated sexual assault of a child. We address these appeals in opinions released the same date as this opinion in our cause numbers 06

- 19

- 00142

- CR and 06

- 19

- 00144

- CR.
23 September 2009 *****************************

NSN: 8960 01 585 8082 (BBCP) * MONOGRAPH NO: E 97

 *****************************

Item: Cranberry Pomegranate, fortified with not less than 90 mg ascorbic acid (Type III, 

Flavor 18, Formulation n)

Document: CID A-A-20098 Beverage Bases, Powdered and PKG&QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 0 Component Classification: Ancillary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Dehydrated product: Uniformly blended, free-flowing, homogenous dry mixture, free 

from hard lumps, red color, granulation can vary from fine powder to small 

agglomerated crystals.

Rehydrated product: Clear to slightly cloudy, sediment free, red color.

Odor: Cranberry and pomegranate blend, sweet and slightly tart.

Flavor: Cranberry and pomegranate blend, sweet and slightly tart.

Texture:

Dehydrated product: Uniformly blended, free-flowing, homogenous mixture, free from 

hard lumps.

Rehydrated product: Sediment free.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Dehydrated product not free-flowing, homogenous dry mixture. May contain hard 

lumps. Darkened in color

Odor: Loss of cranberry and pomegranate. 

Flavor: Loss of cranberry and pomegranate flavor. Loss of sweetness. May become bitter.

Texture: Dehydrated product may contain hard lumps that do not dissolve upon rehydration.

Product not easily hydrated.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

NA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MATTHEW SCOTT BECKER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 462 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of January, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.