alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# fiUil4)itie*^^^ 1 AVIATIO N WAY . DEKALB-PEACHTRE E AIRPORT . ATLANTA , GEORGIA , 3034 1 PHONE : 770.458.985 1 FAX : 770.458.188 3

o >

o > 7/7/201 0 U.S . Departmen

t o f Transportatio n Docke t Managemen

t Syste m 40 0 7t h Stree t SW , Roo mPL-40 0 Washington , D

C 20591-000 1 T o who mi t ma y concern : ^ ' " I a mwritin g t o submit

petitio n fo

r exemption renewa

l t o CF R14 , 135.143(c)(2)/Docke t No . 16097,4 3 F

R46783 , Oct . 10 , 1978 ; a s amendedb y Amdt . 135-22 , 5 2 F

R3392 , Feb . 3 , 1987 . Ou

r previou s exemption , numbe r 6037E , ha s expiredan

dwe faile dto receiv e a

n expiratio n notic e fro

mthe -FAA . OuFfti

r earner c^ificate-Bumbc r

i s CSMA688B : " Thi s par t read s a s follows : § 135.14 3 Genera l requirements . (c ) AT C transponde requipmen t installe d withi n tin e tim e period s indicate d belo w mus t mee t th e perfomianc e an d environmenta l requirement s o f th e followin g TSO's : (1 ) Throug h Januar y 1 , 1992 : (i ) An y clas s o f TSO-C74 b o ran y clas s o f TSO-C74 c a s appropriate , provide d tha t th e equipmen t wa s manufacture d befor e Januar y 1,1990 ; o r (ii ) Th e appropriat e clas s o f TS0-C11 2 (Mod e S) . (2 ) Afte rJanuar y 1 , 1992 : Th e appropriat e class o f TS0-C11 2 (Mod e S) . Fo rpurpose s o f paragrap h (c)(2 ) o f thi s section , "installation " doe s no t include — (i ) Temporary installatio n o f TSO-C74 b o rTSO-C74 c substitut e equipment , a s appropriate , durin g maintenanc e o f th e pennanen t equipment ; (ii ) Reinstallatio n o f equipmen t afte rtemporar y remova l fo rmaintenance ; o r (iii ) Fo rflee t operations , installatio n o f equipmen t i n a fleet aircraf t afte rremova l o f th e equipmen t fo rmaintenanc e fro m anothe raircraf t i n th e sam e operator' s fleet . Althoug h ou r curren t flee t i s equippedwit

h Mod e S transponder s we wouldlik e th e option of

putting aircraf t o n ou r certificat e withou t Mod e S transponders . W

e fee ! operation s ca

n b e conductedsafel

y withou t Mpde_ S a s ha s b-fifi

n prtwenJiv the_past . Jli e cos t burde ato4ipgFade-t

o Mode- S £o

r u s orfoture customers shoul

dnot b e arequirement . Pleas e contac t

m e i f yo u hav e an y questions . Sincerely , Greg g Johnso n Chie f Pilo t Epp s Ai r Service , Inc .
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 38 (Friday, February 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 8932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4166]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-688-000]


Florida MSW5 LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

February 20, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Florida MSW5 LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an 
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is March 12, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#672122352428090b0e090234121717081513270102150449000811"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b6f0f3e4f5f9d8dadfd8d3e5c3c6c6d9c4c2f6d0d3c4d598d1d9c0">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-4166 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 10.6
G. Peter D’Aloia serves as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the company. Mr.D’Aloia’s employment agreement dated December 3, 1999 provides that he will receive annually astock option grant covering at least 150,000 shares of the company’s stock. Due to an adjustment inthe company’s general option grant practice, Mr. D’Aloia received grants covering 129,000 shares inFebruary, 2003 and 108,000 shares in February, 2004. As previously disclosed, on July 7, 2004, thecompany approved a special stock option grant to Mr. D’Aloia covering 28,000 shares to make up forhis reduced grants in 2003 and 2004. This grant becomes exercisable in its entirety on July 7, 2005and has a term of eight years. In addition, Mr. D’Aloia will receive a cash payment ofapproximately $290,000 upon retirement, representing the difference in exercise price between theJuly 7, 2004 grant and the earlier grants.
Mr. D’Aloia received a second special stock option grant on February 2, 2005, covering 35,000shares to complete the offset to his reduced grants in 2003 and 2004, with 21,000 of the optionsvesting and exercisable on February 2, 2006 and 14,000 vesting and exercisable on February 2, 2007.This option has an eight year term. Mr. D’Aloia will receive an additional cash payment ofapproximately $377,000 upon retirement, representing the difference in exercise price between theFebruary 2, 2005 grant and the earlier grants.
|                                           |        |              |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|--------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| SUBSIDIARIES OF GOLUB CAPITAL BDC 3, INC. |
|                                      |   |         |
| Name                                      |   | Jurisdiction |
| GBDC 3 Holdings LLC                       |   | Delaware     |
| GBDC 3 Funding LLC                        |   | Delaware     |
| GBDC 3 Funding II LLC                     |        | Delaware     |
| GBDC 3 Quick Quack Coinvest LLC           |        | Delaware     |
| GBDC 3 Holdings ED Coinvest, Inc.         |        | Delaware     |
No. 09-891.

#### Nucor Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Quinton Brown, et al.

559 U.S. 974, 130 S. Ct. 1720,

176 L. Ed. 2d 185,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2155.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 576 F.3d 149.
# C_2016480EN.01000401.xml

| 22.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 480/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 480/4

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2016/C 480/05)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 30.11.2016 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 30.11.2016-31.12.2016 |
| Member State | Portugal |
| Stock or Group of stocks | GFB/89- and special condition GFB/*567- |
| Species | Greater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides) |
| Zone | Union and international waters of VIII and IX and Union and international waters of V, VI, VII |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 40/TQ1367 |

Date and time of closure

30.11.2016

Duration

30.11.2016-31.12.2016

Member State

Portugal

Stock or Group of stocks

GFB/89- and special condition GFB/*567-

Species

Greater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides)

Phycis blennoides

Zone

Union and international waters of VIII and IX and Union and international waters of V, VI, VII

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

40/TQ1367

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of American Standard Companies Inc. and in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3 pertaining to the registration of $1.0 billion of debt securities
(Registration No. 333-67943), Form S-8 pertaining to the Stock Incentive Plan
(Registration No. 33-63007) and Form S-8 pertaining to the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (Registration No. 333-40575) of our reports dated February 14,
2001 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of American Standard
Companies Inc. included in the 2000 Annual Report to Shareholders of American
Standard Companies Inc., and with respect to the financial statement schedules
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K).


                                               /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
March 30, 2001
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2013 - 0943 Directorate ID : 2013 - SW - 001 - AD Helicopter Model: AgustaWestland S.p.A. (Ty pe Certificate formerly

held by Agusta S.p.A.) Model A109C, A109E, A109K2, and A119 helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 132 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to detect an unairworthy bolt and prevent failure of a bolt, release of a tail rotor blade, and subsequent loss of control of the helic opter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 1,067 for a replacement bolt Labor per Helicopter ( 2 work- hour s x $ 8 5 /work hour for the initial inspection) (1 work- hour x $85/work hour for each recurring inspection) $ 170 $85 Other (Explain) Total Cos t per Helicopter $ 170 for the initial inspection $85 for each recurring inspection $1,067 for a replacement bolt Total US Fleet Cost $ 22,440 for the initial inspection $11,220 for each recurring inspection cycle Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be co nsidered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial num ber of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Robert Grant
**EXHIBIT 32.1.1**NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.CERTIFICATIONIn connection with the Annual Report of Novellus Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),I, Richard S. Hill, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 ofthe United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for theperiods indicated.        Dated as of: August 31, 2005 By:  /s/ Richard S. Hill    Richard S. Hill    Chairman of the Board of Directors and
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5
<CIK>        1067700
<NAME>       R.A.B. ENTERPRISES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                      APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                        JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                                    1,334
<SECURITIES>                                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            43,324
<ALLOWANCES>                                                             (3,682)
<INVENTORY>                                                              65,817
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                        115,810
<PP&E>                                                                   49,601
<DEPRECIATION>                                                          (12,224)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                          264,805
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                    64,015
<BONDS>                                                                 108,150
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                                               37,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                            264,805
<SALES>                                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                        125,774
<CGS>                                                                    97,878
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         27,803
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           125,681
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                        3,918
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                          (3,825)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             (1,416)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                      (2,409)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           3,022
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                                613
<EPS-BASIC>                                                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                 0



</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32**





**Certification
      by the President and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C.
      Section 1350, as Adopted**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





Pursuant
      to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, Barbara Duncan, hereby certify that, to the
      best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DOV
      Pharmaceutical, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in
      the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of DOV Pharmaceutical, Inc.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      DOV and will be retained by DOV and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/Barbara
      Duncan


Barbara
      Duncan


President
      and Chief Financial Officer


August
      9, 2006





These
      certifications accompany this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
      extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such
      certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
      under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act,
      except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
      reference.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4956 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4956

To provide for the mandatory revocation of passports of individuals who 
       are more than $5,000 in arrears in child support payments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2006

Mr. Moran of Kansas (for himself, Mr. Moore of Kansas, Mr. Bachus, Mr. 
Israel, Mr. Ramstad, Mr. Schiff, Mrs. Emerson, and Ms. Bean) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
Means, and in addition to the Committee on International Relations, for 
a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the mandatory revocation of passports of individuals who 
       are more than $5,000 in arrears in child support payments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MANDATORY REVOCATION OF PASSPORTS OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE 
              MORE THAN $5,000 IN ARREARS IN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENTS.

    Section 452(k) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 652(k)) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``, revocation, or 
        limitation'' and inserting ``or revocation''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``may revoke, restrict, 
        or limit'' and inserting ``shall revoke''.
                                 <all>
```
****Exhibit 35.1****

Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation 

**NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

The undersigned, Kevin J. Cullum, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows: 

(1) The undersigned has caused a reviewof the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the period October 10, 2017 through March 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Servicing Agreement, dated as ofMarch 1, 1999, as amended and as supplemented by the 2017-B SUBI Servicing Supplement, dated as of October 10, 2017 (as supplemented, the “Agreement”), by and among Nissan-Infiniti LT, astitling trust, NILT Trust, as UTI beneficiary, and the Company, as servicer, to be conducted under his supervision; and 

(2) To the bestof the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forpublicly-issued asset-backed securities. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 26th day of June, 2018.
No. 09-7384.

#### Raymond Clark, Petitioner v. California.

559 U.S. 969, 130 S. Ct. 1730,

176 L. Ed. 2d 178,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2056.

March 1, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
Montana Fourth Judicial District Court. County of Missoula.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- WILLIAM HARVEY SUTHERS, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-1997-12737

DECISION

On January 7, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to eight (8) years at the Montana State Prison for Count II: Sexual Assault, a Felony, in violation of §45-5-502, MCA and to twelve (12) years at MSP for Count III: Sexual Assault, a felony, in violation of §45-5-502, MCA. The Judgment provided that Count III should run consecutively to Count II and the Defendant was not eligible for parole. Defendant was designated as a Tier III sex offender.

On May 6, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Jennifer Streano of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented. Judge John Larson was present and testified.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the *59Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Done in open Court this 6th day of May, 2016.

DATED this 10th day of June, 2016.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member.
No. 11-6754.

#### Donna Haygood, Petitioner v. Paulding County, Georgia, et al.

565 U.S. 1095, 132 S. Ct. 848,

181 L. Ed. 2d 554,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8970.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.