alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4995 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4995

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 3, 2006

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 7 Columbus Avenue in Tuckahoe, New York, as the ``Ronald Bucca Post 
                               Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RONALD BUCCA POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 7 Columbus Avenue in Tuckahoe, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Ronald Bucca Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ronald 
Bucca Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 2, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. 09-7845.

#### Mikal David Adams, Petitioner v. California.

559 U.S. 1071, 130 S. Ct. 2091,

176 L. Ed. 2d 728,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3463.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
        Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of West Bancorporation, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas E. Stanberry,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of West Bancorporation, Inc.,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) The report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
(2) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of West
Bancorporation, Inc.

November 2, 2006


/s/ Thomas E. Stanberry
-------------------------------------
Thomas E. Stanberry
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer


                                       27
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Maximum Dynamics, Inc. a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Eric Majors, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies
to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Maximum Dynamics, Inc., and will be retained by Maximum Dynamics,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


/s/ Eric Majors
--------------------------
Eric Majors
Chief Executive Officer
November 20, 2003
# C_2016097EN.01001801.xml

| 12.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 97/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 97/18

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 224/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/354 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Central African Republic, apply

(2016/C 97/06)

The attention of the data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 224/2014 (2), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/354 (3).

2

3

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union, represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council, and the department entrusted with the processing operation is Unit 1C, which can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 224/2014, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/354.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the persons concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection, will be answered in accordance with Section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (4).

4

Personal data will be retained for five years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 70, 11.3.2014, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 67, 12.3.2016, p. 18.

3

(4)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

4

---
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**
**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
**FOR THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
     I, John M. Hughes, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alion Science and TechnologyCorporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b)  [Reserved]  c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 

 

     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: February 15, 2005      By: /s/ John M. Hughes     Name: John M. Hughes  Title: Chief Financial Officer
No. 11-7291.

#### Carlos Cegledi, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1099, 132 S. Ct. 862,

181 L. Ed. 2d 561,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8906,

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 441 Fed. Appx. 870.
<PAGE>
                                      As of 4/1/96


Montgomery Ward Credit Corporation
880 Grier Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89119

Gentlemen:

          Reference is made to the Account-Related Agreement by and between
Montgomery Ward Credit Corporation ("MWCC") and Montgomery Ward & Co.,
Incorporated ("MW"), dated as of April 1, 1996 (the "Account-Related
Agreement").

          Signature Financial/Marketing, Inc. ("Signature"), shall reimburse
MWCC for amounts of continued assessments on Accounts with respect to fees,
premiums and charges of Signature where (i) such accounts are past due for
thirty (30) days or more on five (5) minimum payments at the time of assessment
and (ii) where MWCC writes-off such Accounts.  Accounts are those defined in the
Account-Related Agreement.

          Signature shall make such reimbursement payment within ten days after
MWCC bills Signature for such amounts.

          With respect to such reimbursements payments for the period April 1,
1996 through December 31, 1996, MWCC shall bill Signature in January 1997 for
such period and Signature shall make such payment on or before January 31, 1997.

Dated:    December 20, 1996

                                   Very truly yours,

                                   SIGNATURE FINANCIAL/
                                   MARKETING, INC.

                                   By:________________________

Acknowledge and Agreed To:

MONTGOMERY WARD CREDIT CORPORATION

By:______________________________
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION OF OFFICER
                            OF DOVER PETROLEUM, INC.
                           PURSUANT TO 18 USC ss. 1350


Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) the undersigned
officer of Dover  petroleum,  Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify,  to such
officer's knowledge, that:

      (a)   The  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30,
            2004 of the Company fully complies with the  requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   Information  contained in the Form 10-QSB  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: 09/07/04

By:
   --------------------------------------------------
Robert Salna, principal executive and financial officer
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00216-CR

Anthony WOODARD,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009-CR-11453-B

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 8, 2011

DISMISSED

On April 13, 2011, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed 

pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the 

right of appeal was made part of the appellate record within thirty days. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(d), 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 175-76 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, 

order). Appellant did not file an amended certification. The clerk’s record does not contain a 

certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal; to the contrary, the trial court 
04-11-00216-CR

- 2 -

certification in the record states “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has 

NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment 

assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the 

defendant; therefore, the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that defendant has 

no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
**EXHIBIT 31.02**

 

RULE13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Michael L. Pungello, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Kof ML Futures Investments L.P.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and such presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)  Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: March 31, 2006

 
| By | /s/ MICHAEL L. PUNGELLO |   |
|----|-------------------------|--------|

Michael L. Pungello

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

and Treasurer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS, ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation in
this Form 10-K of our report dated October 30, 2000 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of GaSonics International Corporation included
in the Form 10-K filed on December 26, 2000, and to the incorporation by
reference into the previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File
Nos. 333-11825, 33-88156, 33-51056, 33-36787, 33-62807, 333-35487, 333-65567,
333-80453, 333-54056, 333-54058, 333-70146) of Novellus Systems, Inc.

                                                         /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

San Jose, California
March 21, 2002
Power of Attorney, dated July 11, 2011, of Lei Zhang



 Exhibit 4.58 
 [Translation of Chinese Original] 
 Power of Attorney 

Principal: Lei Zhang 
 Address:
[                    ] 
 Attorney-in-Fact:
Beijing Super TV Co., Ltd. 
 Registered Address: 4-406 Jingmeng High-Tech Building B, No. 5-2 Shangdi East Road, Haidian District, Beijing

 I, Lei Zhang, hereby irrevocably authorize Beijing Super TV Co., Ltd. (or its designated third party) to act as my
Attorney-in-Fact and exercise the following rights during the term of this Power of Attorney: 
 Beijing Super TV Co., Ltd. (or
its designated third party) is authorized to exercise, as my plenipotentiary Attorney-in-Fact, all of the rights to vote as a shareholder at the shareholders’ meetings of Beijing Novel-Super Digital TV Technology Co., Ltd. (“N-S Digital
TV”), that I have under laws and the Article of Association of N-S Digital TV, including but not limited to selling or transferring all or any part of my equity in N-S Digital TV and rights to vote, at the shareholders’ meetings of N-S
Digital TV, on the nomination and appointment of directors of N-S Digital TV. 
 I, the Principal, will assume all legal effects
of all actions performed by the Attorney-in-Fact on my behalf under this Power of Attorney. 
 The term of this Power of
Attorney is 10 years, starting from the date of its execution, unless the Loan Agreement (Appendix 1) by and between Beijing Super TV Co., Ltd. and Lei Zhang and the Loan Agreement (Appendix 2) terminate early for any reason. If the terms of the
Loan Agreement (Appendix 1) and the Loan Agreement (Appendix 2) are extended, that of this Power of Attorney shall be automatically extended accordingly, always based on the last executed Loan Agreement. All matters under this Power of Attorney
shall be governed by laws of China. This Power of Attorney is written in Chinese. 
  

	
	Principal: Lei Zhang
	
	 /s/ Lei Zhang

	 July 11, 2011










 Appendix 1 
 Loan Agreement (Omitted) 
 Appendix 2 
 Loan Agreement (Omitted)
No. 09-8858.

#### Lindsey Kent Springer, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

559 U.S. 1017, 130 S. Ct. 1907,

176 L. Ed. 2d 383,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2550.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 580 F.3d 1142.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Terra Nostra Resources Corp.  (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeff Reynolds, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  August 22, 2005

By: /s/ Jeff Reynolds

Name: Jeff Reynolds

Title:   Chief Financial Officer
# C_2016214EN.01002301.xml

| 15.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 214/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 214/23

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

(2016/C 214/07)

Pursuant to the second indent of Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

1

2

On page 45, in the Explanatory Notes to Chapter 7, the following paragraph is inserted between the subject header ‘General’ and its existing text (‘Sprouts ...’):

On page 45, in the Explanatory Notes to Chapter 7, the following paragraph is inserted between the subject header ‘General’

‘Blanching is not permitted within this Chapter, with the exception of:

| — | Frozen vegetables (uncooked or cooked by steaming or boiling in water) of heading 0710; |
| --- | --- |

—

Frozen vegetables (uncooked or cooked by steaming or boiling in water) of heading 0710;

| — | Dried leguminous vegetables, shelled, whether or not skinned or split, of heading 0713.’ |
| --- | --- |

—

Dried leguminous vegetables, shelled, whether or not skinned or split, of heading 0713.’

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 76, 4.3.2015, p. 1.

2

---