alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

*********************** 

MONOGRAPH NO. BE11 

 ***********************

ITEM: Pork Sausage Links in Brine, No. 10 Can 

 

ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR-P-035 NSN: 8905 00 753 6432 

COMPONENT CLASSIFICAION: Primary 

 

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 313 (PRIMARY) 

 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM: 

 

APPEARANCE: Approximately 3" x 1/2" cylindrical sausage links with an irregular oily surface. 

Casings are not apparent. Interior is that of a compact ground meat. Color profile: Exterior-pale, 

mottled grayish tan with a variable amount of golden' brown grill marks. Interior-mottled pinkish tan 

with pink color slowly dissipating. 

 

ODOR: Cooked pork with a slightly sweet and mildly spicy aroma: 

 

FLAVOR: : Typical of mildly seasoned cooked pork sausage. A moderate to high fatty; moderately 

salty, slightly sweet taste is noticeable. 

 

TEXTURE: Links are soft, tender; and slightly mushy with a moist interior. A fatty mouthfeel is 

noticeable. 

 

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36 months 

 100 DEGREES F: 6 months 

 

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES: 

 

APPEARANCE: Surface may become greasy and shiny: 

 

ODOR: Product may become slightly stale or rancid. 

 

FLAVOR: Slightly stale or rancid. Product may become bland. 

 

TEXTURE: Links may become softer with some sloughing of the casing 

 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None. 

 

SPECIAL NOTES: Can is designed to yield 18 portions of 5 links each (96 grams).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6652

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BRADLEY DEAN BIDGOOD, a/k/a Brad,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District

Judge. (CA-95-32-5-02-BR)

Submitted: September 25, 2001 Decided: October 23, 2001

Before WILKINS and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph H. Craven, James B. Craven, III, Durham, North Carolina, for

Appellant. John Stuart Bruce, United States Attorney, Anne M.

Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Christine Witcover Dean,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Bradley Dean Bidgood seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying the government’s motion to reduce his sentence under

Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b). We dismiss the appeal from the denial of

the Rule 35(b) motion because the order is not reviewable. See

United States v. Pridgen, 64 F.3d 147, 149-50 (4th Cir. 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2016205EN.01002201.xml

| 9.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/22

---

Notice concerning a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU

Request made by a Contracting Entity

(2016/C 205/10)

On 21 March 2016 the Commission received a request in accordance with Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement procedures by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (1). The first working day following receipt of the request is 22 March 2016.

1

This request, from the Federal Association of the Energy and Water Industry (BDEW Bundesverband der Energie- und Wasserwirtschaft e.V.) on behalf of the contracting entities in that sector, concerns certain activities in the market for retail of electricity and gas in Germany.

Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU provides that the later Directive is not applicable when the relevant activity is directly exposed to competition in markets to which access is not restricted. These conditions are evaluated solely for the purposes of Directive 2014/25/EU and are without prejudice to the application of competition rules or other fields of EU policies.

Pursuant to letter (a) of first paragraph, of point 1 of Annex IV to Directive 2014/25/EU, the Commission is allowed a period of 90 working days to take a decision on this request, commencing on the working day referred to above. The period therefore expires on 4 August 2016.

---

(1)  OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243.

1

---
No. 09-8095.

#### Montrell D. Ventry, Petitioner v. Arkansas.

559 U.S. 949, 130 S. Ct. 1531,

176 L. Ed. 2d 130,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1281.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas denied.

Same case below, 2009 Ark. 300, 318 S.W.3d 576.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4987 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4987

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an increased maximum 
   penalty for telemarketing fraud targeting seniors, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2006

  Mr. Hayes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on 
     Government Reform and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an increased maximum 
   penalty for telemarketing fraud targeting seniors, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Seniors Taking on Phony Marketers 
Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED MAXIMUM PENALTY FOR TELEMARKETING FRAUD TARGETING 
              SENIORS.

    Section 2326 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``10 years'' and inserting ``15 years''.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2007 for 
the purposes of enforcing chapter 113A of title 18, United States Code, 
and related matters--
            (1) $10,000,000 for the Postal Inspection Service to hire, 
        equip, and train no fewer than 50 postal inspectors and support 
        staff to investigate telemarketing fraud cases;
            (2) $3,500,000 to hire, equip, and train no fewer than 30 
        Department of Justice attorneys, assistant United States 
        Attorneys, and support staff to prosecute telemarketing fraud 
        cases;
            (3) $5,000,000 for the Postal Inspection Service to 
        conduct, in cooperation with State and local law enforcement 
        agencies and senior citizen advocacy organizations, public 
        awareness and prevention initiatives for senior citizens, such 
        as seminars and training; and
            (4) $2,500,000 for the Federal Trade Commission to conduct 
        public information awareness campaigns and prevention 
        initiatives for senior citizens and to publicize available 
        assistance such as 1877-FTC-HELP.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2017372EN.01000402.xml

| 1.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 372/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 372/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8651 — Bosch/HASCO/ASCN)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 372/03)

On 26 October 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8651. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8651. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
No. 11-509.

#### Robert L. Bushnell, Petitioner v. Bedford County, Tennessee.

565 U.S. 1112, 132 S. Ct. 1016,

181 L. Ed. 2d 737,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 333.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 472.
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**     I, Vincent E. Estrada, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Visicu, Inc. on Form10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained insuch Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Visicu, Inc.       Dated: November 3, 2006 By: /s/ Vincent E. Estrada Vincent E. Estrada      Senior Vice President and      Chief Financial Officer
No. 08-998.

#### Jan Hamilton, Chapter 13 Trustee, Petitioner v. Stephanie Kay Lanning.

559 U.S. 934, 130 S. Ct. 1568,

176 L. Ed. 2d 107,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1257.

February 22, 2010.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.
No. 09-7676.

#### Gerald H. Sternberg, Petitioner v. Michigan State University, et al.

559 U.S. 1059, 130 S. Ct. 2368,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3062.

176 L. Ed. 2d 579,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1128, 130 S. Ct. 1094, 175 L. Ed. 2d 913, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 381.
May 29, 2015 

Mr. Robert M. Dennison 

115 S. Houle Ave 

Sarasota, FL 34232 

Dear Mr. Dennison: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your April 29, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-1344), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lorrie Ann Archibald, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Ireland Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                         





| | By:    | /s/ Lorrie Ann Archibald   
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | LORRIE ANN ARCHIBALD       
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | August 14, 2006            



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
No. 09-7923.

#### Steven Allen Schwartz, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1094, 130 S. Ct. 2371,

176 L. Ed. 2d 770,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3567,

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 315 Fed. Appx. 412.
No. 09-8019.

#### In re Vincent M. Singleton, Petitioner.

559 U.S. 1033, 130 S. Ct. 1946,

176 L. Ed. 2d 410,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2403.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1109, 130 S. Ct. 1116, 175 L. Ed. 2d 930, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 82.
# C_2017301EN.01000102.xml

| 12.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8408 — Cinven/CPPIB/Travel Holdings Parent Corporation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 301/02)

On 22 May 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8408. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8408. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
2 1 2 2 2μ η = 200 N M P I L = 50%n 1 n 2n 1 n 2 P I B P I DCL CB CL CD R 2> 

## C
# C_2017214EN.01000102.xml

| 4.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 214/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 214/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8499 — Goldman Sachs/Caldic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 214/02)

On 23 June 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8499. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8499. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
No. 09-8295.

#### Coyt Bryant, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 953, 130 S. Ct. 1541,

176 L. Ed. 2d 135,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1264.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 329 Fed. Appx. 435.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Council on Disability

# Type: 

Quarterly meeting. 

# Dates and Times:

 

March 30, 2009, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. 

March 31, 2009, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. 

April 1, 2009, 8:30 a.m.-1 p.m. 

# Location:

Academy for Educational Development Conference Center, 1825 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. 

# Status:

 

March 30, 2009, 8:30 a.m.-9:30 a.m.—Closed Executive Session. 

March 30, 2009, 9:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.—Open. 

March 31, 2009, 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.—Open. 

April 1, 2009, 8:30 a.m.-1:00 p.m.—Open. 

# Agenda:

                        Public Comment Sessions; Emergency Preparedness; Employment; Healthcare; Reports from the Chairperson, Council Members, and the Executive Director; Release of                         *National Disability Policy: A Progress Report*                         and                         *Federal Employment of People with Disabilities;*                         Unfinished Business; New Business; Announcements; Adjournment.                     

# Sunshine Act Meeting Contact:

Mark S. Quigley, Director of External Affairs, NCD, 1331 F Street, NW., Suite 850, Washington, DC 20004; 202-272-2004 (voice), 202-272-2074 (TTY), 202-272-2022 (fax). 

# Agency Mission:

                        NCD is an independent Federal agency and is composed of 15 members appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. NCD provides advice to the President, Congress, and executive branch agencies promoting policies, programs, practices, and procedures that                               ( print page 9642)                            guarantee equal opportunity for all individuals with disabilities, regardless of the nature or severity of the disability; and to empower individuals with disabilities to achieve economic self-sufficiency, independent living, and inclusion and integration into all aspects of society.                     

# Accommodations:

Those needing reasonable accommodations should notify NCD immediately. 

Dated: February 26, 2009. 

Michael C. Collins, 

Executive Director.

 [FR Doc. E9-4772 Filed 3-3-09; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6820-MA-P