alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ITEM: Beverage Base, Powder, Iced Tea, ************************

Lemon flavored, ind serving, 18 per box * MONOGRAPH: 6B1

 (BBT) Primary ************************

NSN: 8955-01-473-9290 ITEM SPECIFICATION: COMMERCIAL

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Dehydrated; homogeneous mixture of cocoa brown, fine, free flowing 

powder. Rehydrated; cloudy, reddish-brown liquid.

ODOR: Sweet, mild tea aroma.

FLAVOR: Tea/lemon, sweet-tart.

TEXTURE: Free flowing, fine powder; lumps that occur can be broken apart by light, 

finger pressure.

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36 months

 100 DEGREES F: 6 months

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

APPREARANCE: Dehydrated; lumpy or caked, not free flowing. Rehydrated; 

coagulated, excessive sediment significantly affecting aesthetic appearance or flavor.

ODOR: Burnt or scorched.

FLAVOR: Oxidized or any other flavor not typical of the type of beverage.

TEXTURE:

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: Prepare beverage in accordance with 

package instructions. Product should dissolve completely within approximately two minutes.

SPECIAL NOTES: In rehydrated product, if slight sedimentation is observed but the odor and 

flavor are normal, do not score the sedimentation as a defect during surveillance inspection; 

make note of it in the narrative for future use. Coagulation may occur if the product has had 

temperature abuse. Coagulation results in clumps of granules that do not readily dissolve when 

product is reconstituted and tend to float in suspension.
No. 09-8014.

#### In Re Charles Willy Alpine, Petitioner.

559 U.S. 935, 130 S. Ct. 1526,

176 L. Ed. 2d 153,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1061.

February 22, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305, and cases cited therein.
*************************** 

 MONOGRAPH NO: lA1B 

 ************************** 

ITEM: Eggs with Beef and Potato 

NSN: 8940-01-485-4049 ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR-E-008 Can 

 8940-01-485-4050 PCR-E-009 Poly 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM: 

APPEARANCE: eggs slightly yellow/tannish with potato dices and beef pieces dispersed 

throughout 

ODOR: slight cooked egg; slight cooked beef; slight saltiness 

FLAVOR: typical egg and beef flavors; slightly salty; slightly cooked potato 

TEXTURE: eggs somewhat soft; beef moist and slightly chewy/tender; firm potatoes 

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36m 

 100 DEGREES F: 6m 

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES: 

APPEARANCE: darkening of eggs, beef, and potatoes 

ODOR: sulphur; cooked egg; rancid/old beef 

FLAVOR: sulphur; cooked egg; rancid/old beef 

TEXTURE: drying and/or toughening of beef; rubbery egg; softening of potatoes 

 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00291-CR

APRIL FELICIA OWENS 

A/K/A APRIL F. OWENS

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

On July 5, 2011, as part of a plea-bargain agreement, Appellant April 

Felicia Owens a/k/a April F. Owens pleaded guilty to theft, and the trial court 

sentenced her to seven months’ confinement in state jail. Also on July 5, 2011, 

the trial court certified that this is a plea-bargain case and that Appellant has no 

right to appeal. On July 14, 2011, Appellant filed a notice of appeal. On July 15, 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

2011, we notified Appellant that the trial court’s certification, which indicates that 

Appellant has no right to appeal, had been filed in this court and that this appeal 

could be dismissed unless Appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal 

filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal by August 1, 2011. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 44.3. To date, we have received no response 

showing grounds for continuing the appeal.

Rule 25.2(a)(2) limits the right of appeal in a plea-bargain case to matters 

that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or to cases in 

which the appellant obtained the trial court’s permission to appeal. Tex. R. App. 

P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification denied permission to appeal, but 

Appellant’s notice of appeal asserts that the matters to be addressed in her 

appeal were raised by written motion and ruled on before trial. However, the trial 

court specifically noted on the face of Appellant’s notice of appeal, “There were 

no PT motions with appeal issues heard.”

Further, the record shows that Appellant and her counsel signed a 

document entitled “Written Waiver of Defendant – Joined by Attorney,” which 

states, “I give up and waive any and all rights of appeal in this case.” The court 

of criminal appeals has held that a valid waiver of appeal will prevent a defendant 

from appealing without the consent of the trial court. Monreal v. State, 99 

S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Because Appellant has waived her 

right to appeal and no one has responded to our July 15, 2011 letter requesting 
3

grounds for continuing the appeal, we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

25.2(d), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: September 15, 2011
##### 



SECOND AMENDMENT TO
ALION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP, SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN

WHEREAS, Alion Science and Technology Corporation (the Company)
maintains an Employee Ownership, Savings and Investment Plan for the benefit of
its Employees and the Employees of any other Adopting Employer, which Plan was
last amended and restated as of December 19, 2001 (the Plan); and

WHEREAS, under Section 15.1 of the Plan, the Company reserved the right to
amend the Plan at any time, in whole or in part, by action of its Board of
Directors; and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company, pursuant to Section 15.1
of the Plan, has delegated authority to amend the Plan to the undersigned
officer, provided he determines that the amendment would not materially
increase costs of the Plan to the Company or any Adopting Employer; and

WHEREAS, the undersigned officer has determined that this Second Amendment
would not materially increase costs of the Plan to the Company or any Adopting
Employer;

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the powers of amendment reserved under Section 15.1
of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended by the Company, effective October 1,
2002, as follows:

ARTICLE II

Section 2.13 - Amended by striking provision (E) from subsection (a)(1) and
relettering provision (F) provision (E).

In General

Any provision of the amended and restated Plan inconsistent with
the foregoing changes is hereby amended to be
consistent
herewith.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Alion Science and Technology Corporation has caused
this Second Amendment to the Plan to be executed on its behalf by its duly
authorized officer on this 27 day of March, 2003.

ALION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Bahman AtefiTitle:
    Chairman & CEO(Seal)
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




The
      undersigned, Lijun Peng, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of CHINA
      AGRITECH, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:




1.  
      The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007
      (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  
      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 14th
      day of August, 2007.




/s/
      Lijun Peng




Lijun
      Peng


Chief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Agritech, Inc. and will be retained by China Agritech, Inc. and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




The
      forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      and
      is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
      made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
      language in such filing.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT EARL E. HENRY, P.E., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1866 ) FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ) ENGINEERS, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed April 3, 2019. Appeal from the Florida Board of Professional Engineers. Earl E. Henry, pro se. John J. Rimes of Florida Engineers Management Corporation, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
# C_2016204EN.01000701.xml

| 8.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/7

---

Notification by Italy of the application of Article 19(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 concerning traffic distribution rules for the airports Milan Malpensa, Milan Linate and Orio al Serio (Bergamo)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 204/03)

Pursuant to Article 19(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and the Council of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (1), on 23 April 2015 the Commission received notification from Italy of a draft Decree amending Decree No 15 of 3 March 2000 on the distribution of air traffic within the Milan airport system, as amended (2), and abolishing Ministerial Decree No 395 of 1 October 2014 (3).

1

2

3

On 17 December 2015 the Commission had adopted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 a negative decision on Ministerial Decree No 395 of 1 October 2014 (4) which modified the traffic distribution rules within the Milan airport system (the so-called ‘Lupi Decree’). The Commission found that, contrary to the provisions of this Regulation, Italy had failed to consult interested parties before modifying the traffic distribution rules.

4

Italy therefore prepared and notified a new draft Decree. The notified draft Decree, when adopted and entered into force, will modify the traffic distribution rules within the Milan airport system in the same way as the Lupi Decree did. It will remove any limitations at Linate airport on the number of daily return services to EU airports identified on the basis of passenger traffic volume. The limitations with respect to the use of narrow-body (single-aisle) aircraft and the operation of point-to-point scheduled connections at Linate airport will remain in place. At the same time the notified draft Decree will abolish the Lupi Decree.

The Commission invites interested parties to submit their comments within 15 days of publication of this communication, to:

| Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport (Unit E4 internal market and airports) |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Office: DM24 05/84 |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: Christophe.Dussart@ec.europa.eu |

Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport (Unit E4 internal market and airports)

European Commission

Office: DM24 05/84

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: Christophe.Dussart@ec.europa.eu

---

(1)  OJ L 293, 31.10.2008, p. 3.

1

(2)  Italian Official Gazette No 60 of 13 March 2000 and Italian Official Gazette No 14 of 18 January 2001.

2

Italian Official Gazette

Italian Official Gazette

(3)  Italian Official Gazette No 237 of 11 October 2014.

3

Italian Official Gazette

(4)  OJ L 333, 19.12.2015, p. 124.

4

---
# C_2016417EN.01001002.xml

| 11.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 417/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 417/10

---

EXECUTIVE AGENCY FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2015

(2016/C 417/37)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://ec.europa.eu/easme/en/about-easme

---
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 9, 2009

1215 

# Order

January 9, 2009

137499

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137499 COA: 286347 Saginaw CC: 07-028676-FC CHAD JOHN LEACHMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the August 25, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

H ATHAWAY 

### , J., not participating.
EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-49138, 033-22977, 33-22977 and
33-89930 on Form S-8 of Mesaba Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated May 7, 2003 (June 2, 2003 as to Note 15), which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the application of procedures relating to certain disclosures of financial statement amounts related to the the
fiscal 2002 and 2001 consolidated financial statements that were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations and for which we have expressed no opinion or other form of assurance other than
with respect to such disclosures, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mesaba Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended March 31, 2003.

DELOITTE &
TOUCHE LLP

Minneapolis,
Minnesota
June 27, 2003

---

QuickLinks
No. 09-7554.

#### Dwayne Brown, Petitioner v. David Rock, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, et al.

559 U.S. 1031, 130 S. Ct. 1881,

176 L. Ed. 2d 403,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2529.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

*404Same case below, 577 F.3d 107.
No. 11-7740.

#### Fawzi Mustapha Assi, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1168, 132 S. Ct. 1119,

181 L. Ed. 2d 999,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 596.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 428 Fed. Appx. 570.
No. 09-8403.

#### Jimmy Murrell Owen, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

559 U.S. 995, 130 S. Ct. 1744,

176 L. Ed. 2d 218,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2254.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Compensation Program for Certain Directors



 Exhibit 10.34 
 Compensation Program for Certain Directors, Effective July 1, 2010 
 Directors
who are not HBC employees or employees of the GS entities, the Onex entities, or their respective affiliates will receive: 
  

	•	 	 cash compensation of $17,500 per quarter; and 


  

	•	 	 an annual option to purchase the number of HBI common shares that will result in an aggregate exercise price of $100,000, based on the fair market
value per share of the underlying stock at the date of grant; 


  

	•	 	 an opportunity to make an irrevocable election annually on or before December 31 to take up to $12,500 of their quarterly cash compensation in
equivalent shares of HBI common stock; and 


  

	•	 	 an opportunity to make an irrevocable election annually to defer up to 50% of their cash compensation in a deferred compensation plan.



 In addition, each director who is not our employee or an employee of the GS entities, the Onex entities, or their
respective affiliates and who also serves as a Chairperson for the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of HBI will receive an additional $1,250 per quarter.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4909 

To repeal the transition and grandfather provisions relating to foreign sales 

corporations and extraterritorial income. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2006 

Mr. STARK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To repeal the transition and grandfather provisions relating 

to foreign sales corporations and extraterritorial income. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Trade Sanction Avoid5 ance Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF FSC–ETI TRANSITION AND GRAND7 FATHER PROVISIONS. 

8 (a) ETI PROVISIONS.—Section 101 of the American 

9 Jobs Creation Act of 2004 is amended by striking sub10 sections (d) and (f). 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 4909 IH 

1 (b) FSC PROVISIONS.—Section 5 of the FSC Repeal 

2 and Extraterritorial Income Exclusion Act of 2000 is 

3 amended by striking subsection (c). 

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

6 December 31, 2005. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
No. 09-7275.

#### Donald G. Jones, Petitioner v. The Shaw Group, et al.

559 U.S. 969, 130 S. Ct. 1730,

176 L. Ed. 2d 178,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2074.

March 1, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
Exhibit 32




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cobalis Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.



Dated:  December 9, 2004             By: /s/ Chaslav Radovich
                                         --------------------------------------
                                            Chaslav Radovich
                                            Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-8371.

#### Josephine Ledezma, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 955, 130 S. Ct. 1547,

176 L. Ed. 2d 139,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1295.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 09-9212.

#### Dheadry Loyd Powell, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1024, 130 S. Ct. 1930,

176 L. Ed. 2d 397,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2517.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 359 Fed. Appx. 942.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA Y 23, 2014

NO. 03

- 14

- 00171

- CV

A&T Consultants, Ltd., Appellant

v.

Roark Amusement & Vending, L.P., Appellee

APPEAL FROM 419TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AN D FIELD

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on March 7, 2014. A&T

Consultants, Ltd. filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the

Court agrees that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and

dismisses the appeal

. A&T Consultants, Ltd. shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in

this Court and the court below.
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cobalis Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarter  ending June 30,  2004 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      (1)   The report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated:  August 23, 2004                   By: /s/ Chaslav Radovich
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Chaslav Radovich
                                               Chief Executive Officer and
                                               Chief Financial Officer

                                       23