alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| March 29, 2007 | By:    | /s/                                  David A. Wheat |   |
|----------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| (Date)

  |   | David A. Wheat

Director, Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

                                                                                                          |   |

 

 

 

----
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Terra Nostra Resources Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald C. Nicholson, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  April 19, 2006

By:

/s/ Donald C. Nicholson



Name:  Donald C. Nicholson

Title:    Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
To:

Cc:

Bcc:

Subject: Data Request Follow-up Answer from Dr. H. Oliveira (re: Cell Biology and Toxicology 

[2009] 25:341-353)

From: "Helena Oliveira" <holiveira@ua.pt>

To: Erin Hines/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/21/2011 06:53 AM

Subject: RE: Blood Lead Levels

Thank you for your interest in my work.

Unfortunately at that time we were not able to measure lead levels in 

blood, however we assessed the levels on testis, at day 5, meaning 24 

h after last lead administration:

Control:0.012 μg/g fresh weight

74 mg: 0.099 μg/g fresh weight

100 mg:0.136 μg/g fresh weight

Regards,

Helena Oliveira

-----------------------------------------------------------

Helena Oliveira, PhD

Laboratory of Biotechnology and Citomics 

Department of Biology, CESAM

University of Aveiro 

Campus Universitário Santiago, 3810-193 AVEIRO

Phone: +351 234 370 350 / Ext.22750

Fax: +351 234 372 587

Email: holiveira@ua.pt
-----Mensagem original-----

De: Hines.Erin@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Hines.Erin@epamail.epa.gov]

Enviada: quinta-feira, 17 de Fevereiro de 2011 15:24

Para: holiveira@ua.pt

Assunto: Blood Lead Levels

Hello,

I am writing regarding your 2009 publication in Cell Biol Toxicol

entitled "Lead Chloride affects sperm motility and acrosome reaction 

in

mice." http://www.springerlink.com/content/jg41745543j36k77/

Did you collect blood lead levels or tissue lead levels for

these animals? If so, what are these values?

Thank you,

Erin

Erin Pias Hines, Ph.D.

Biologist

U.S. EPA; Office of Research and Development

National Center for Environmental Assessment

Environmental Media Assessment Group

Office B221K; Mailcode B243-01

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

(919) 541-4204 phone; (919) 541-2985 fax

hines.erin@epa.gov
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                             AMERICAN STANDARD INC.
             COMPUTATION OF THE RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (Dollars in Millions)


                                            For the Years ended December 31,
                                            --------------------------------

                                     1995     1996       1997     1998     1999
                                     ----     ----       ----     ----     ----

Income (loss) from continuing
 operations before taxes           $234.0    $71.1     $347.0   $189.8   $451.5


Equity in net (income) loss of
 associated companies net of
 dividends received                  11.0     11.8       (2.9)    (3.6)    (5.1)

Amortization of capitalized
  interest                            1.1      1.3        1.4      1.6      1.8

Interest expense                    213.3    198.2      192.2    188.4    192.1

Rental expense factor                23.0     27.3       25.0     26.5     33.9
                                    -----    -----      -----    -----    -----

Earnings available for
 fixed charges                     $482.4   $309.7     $562.7   $402.7   $674.2
                                   ======   ======     ======   ======   ======

Interest expense                   $213.3   $198.2     $192.2   $188.4   $192.1

Capitalized interest                  4.0      3.9        3.8      4.5      3.3

Rental expense factor                23.0     27.3       25.0     26.5     33.9
                                    -----    -----      -----    -----    -----

Fixed charges                      $240.3   $229.4     $221.0   $219.4   $229.3
                                   ======   ======     ======   ======   ======
Ratio of earnings to fixed
 charges (a)                          2.0       1.3       2.5      1.8      2.9


a)  For the purpose of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, fixed
   charges consist of interest on debt (including capitalized interest),
   amortization of debt discount and expense, and a portion of rentals
   determined to be representative of interest. Earnings consist of consolidated
   net income before income taxes, plus fixed charges other than capitalized
   interest but including the amortization thereof, adjusted by the excess or
   deficiency of dividends over income of entities accounted for by the equity
   method.
No. 09-838.

#### Lucy Fothergill, et al., Petitioners v. United States.

559 U.S. 1006, 130 S. Ct. 1892,

176 L. Ed. 2d 365,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2631.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 566 F.3d 248.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4961 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the deduction 

for the health insurance costs of self-employed individuals be allowed 

in determining self-employment tax. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 15, 2006 

Ms. HART (for herself and Mr. MANZULLO) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

that the deduction for the health insurance costs of selfemployed individuals be allowed in determining self-employment tax. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Self-Employed Health 

5 Care Affordability Act of 2006’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4961 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SECA TAX DEDUCTION FOR HEALTH INSURANCE 

2 COSTS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (l) of section 162 (re4 lating to special rules for health insurance costs of self5 employed individuals) is amended by striking paragraph 

6 (4) and by redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (4). 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

9 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

     I Robert Salna, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Dover Petroleum Corp.;

     2.   Based upon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.

     3.   Based upon my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this quarterly report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

     4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for
the registrant and have:

          a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;

          b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior
to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date");
and

          c)   Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

     5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          a)   All significant deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls.

     6.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: January 15, 2004             /s/ Robert Salna


                                   Robert Salna, Principal Financial
                                   Officer
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4882 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2006 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To ensure the proper remembrance of Vietnam veterans and 

the Vietnam War by designating a site for a visitor 

center for the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

HR 4882 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vietnam Veterans Me3 morial Visitor Center Enforcement Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SITE. 

5 Section 6 of Public Law 96–297 is amended by add6 ing at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(e) SITE.—The visitor center authorized by sub8 section (a) shall be located in the open land in the tri9 angular area between Henry Bacon Drive, NW, 23rd 

10 Street, NW, Constitution Avenue, NW, and the Lincoln 

11 Memorial.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 28, 

2006. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
No. 09-8198.

#### In Re Alfredo Masis Sancho, Petitioner.

559 U.S. 935, 130 S. Ct. 1535,

176 L. Ed. 2d 153,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1090,

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
No. 09-9343.

#### Ronald A. Thurmond, Petitioner v. Ken McKee, Warden.

559 U.S. 1078, 130 S. Ct. 2114,

176 L. Ed. 2d 740,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3305.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (adopted pursuantto §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned President andChief Executive Officer of Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company forthe quarterly period ended October 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation of the Company.

 
| Date: December 15, 2008 |                                     |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                         |                                     |
|                         | /s/ Timothy J. Dodd                      |
|                         |                                     |
|                         | Timothy J. Dodd                          |
|                         | *President and Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

1

----
No. 09-5887.

#### William G. Scott, Petitioner v. Mississippi.

559 U.S. 941, 130 S. Ct. 1500,

176 L. Ed. 2d 117,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1205.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.

Same case below, 8 So. 3d 855.
**Q500 4k**  **Owner	Maintenance	Procedures**

All	maintenance	will	be	performed	in	accordance	with	the	manufacturers requirements,	safe - operating	practices	and	per	the	operator’s	maintenance procedures	as	described	herein.		The	Aircraft	log	sheet	will	be	closed and	a	new	log sheet	created	after	7	days	ending	at	2400	hours	on	Sunday	on	a	weekly	basis. Pre - flight	inspection	per	the	operator’s	checklist	required	before	each	flight.		The operator	requires	an	inspection	signoff;	once	daily	on	the	day	that	the	aircraft	is intended	to	be	flown	prior	to	flight. Discrepancies	and	deficiencies	will	be	noted	in	the	aircraft	logbook	to	include	an Item	number,	Date	and	time,	Discrepancy,	Persons	name	and	Certificate	number. The	aircraft	will	not	be	flown	until	the	Discrepa ncy	is	corrected	and	signed	off	by the	operator	or	authorized	repair	person,	listing	the	Item	number,	Date	and	Time, the	corrective	action	taken	and	the	person’s	signature	performing	the	corrective action. All	airframe,	ground	station	and	component	items are	per	the	manufacturer,	on condition	and	time	limits	will	be	set	as	the	needed. As	preventative	maintenance	the	operator	elects	to	time	limit	propeller	O - rings	to	a maximum	of	4	calendar	weeks	of	installation.		O - rings	will	be	removed	and	replaced at that	time	interval	or	upon	condition	with	an	equivalent	or	higher	quality	O - ring than	that	supplied	by	the	manufacturer.		All	four	O - rings	will	be	replaced	anytime	a replacement	is	performed.		An	appropriate	entry	will	be	made	noting	the	flight	time since last	change	and	the	installation	date	and	time. Weekly,	beginning	at	the	start	of	a	new	week	the	propeller	shaft	threads	will	have	a small	amount	of	anti - seize	applied	to	the	propeller	hub	threads	to	prevent	galling and	propeller	seizure. Propellers	will	be	installed	by	turning	the	propeller	in	the	proper	direction	until contact	is	made	with	the	O - ring,	then	one	full	and	a	half	turn	will	be	made	to properly	seat	the	propellers	on	the	shaft.		This	is	per	the	manufacturers recommendation. This	maintenan ce	procedure	list	will	be	updated	and	amended	as	necessary.
No. 09-9597.

#### Debra Ceniceros, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1081, 130 S. Ct. 2124,

176 L. Ed. 2d 747,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3120.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 329 Fed. Appx. 498.
No. 09-8342.

#### Danny M. Kelly, Petitioner v. Richard J. Day, et al.

559 U.S. 969, 130 S. Ct. 1731,

176 L. Ed. 2d 178,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2191.

March 1, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until March 22, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
| (1)   | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Delta Oil & Gas, Inc. for the                quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the                quarter ended September 30, 2005, fairly presents in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Delta                Oil                & Gas, Inc.. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: | /s/                Douglas Bolen                                                                 |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Douglas                Bolen                                                               |
|  Title:    |  Chief                Executive Officer,Chief                Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  November                17, 2005                                                           |
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 6 (Thursday, January 9, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 1608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00046]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2010-0819; FRL-9905-15-Region 6]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Texas; Environmental Speed Limit Revision for the Dallas/Fort Worth 8-
Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve a revision to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the 
Dallas/Fort Worth ozone nonattainment area to recategorize a local 
environmental speed limit control measure to a transportation control 
measure. The EPA is proposing to approve this SIP revision because it 
satisfies the requirements of sections 110 and part D of the Clean Air 
Act (CAA), and EPA's policy and guidance.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before February 10, 
2014.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air 
Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Comments may also be 
submitted electronically or through hand delivery/courier by following 
the detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the direct final 
rule located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carrie Paige, Air Planning Section 
(6PD-L); telephone (214) 665-6521; email address paige.carrie@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of this Federal 
Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct rule 
without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a 
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A 
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final 
rule. If no relevant adverse comments are received in response to this 
action no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives relevant 
adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all 
public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule 
based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment 
period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do 
so at this time.
    For additional information, see the direct final rule which is 
located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: December 20, 2013.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2014-00046 Filed 1-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
No. 09-8012.

#### Allen Dewayne Bates, Petitioner v. Jeff Davis, et al.

559 U.S. 948, 130 S. Ct. 1525,

176 L. Ed. 2d 128,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1321.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 332 Fed. Appx. 983.
No. 09-7382.

#### Albert Randolph, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1071, 130 S. Ct. 2090,

176 L. Ed. 2d 728,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3468.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 326 Fed. Appx. 974.
No. 08-1264.

#### Tejbir S. Oberoi, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 999, 130 S. Ct. 1878,

176 L. Ed. 2d 356,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2561.

March 22, 2010.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Bloate v. United States, 559 U.S. 196, 130 S. Ct. 1345, 176 L. Ed. 2d 54 (2010).

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 547 F.3d 436.