alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission. 

# Cancellations:

 Executive Session scheduled for February 24, 2009. Open Meeting scheduled for February 26, 2009. Executive Session scheduled for March 3, 2009. Open Meeting scheduled for March 5, 2009. 

# Date and Time:

 Wednesday, March 4, 2009, at 10 a.m. and Thursday, March 5, 2009, at 2 p.m. 

# Place:

 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. 

# Status:

 These meetings will be closed to the public. 

# Items to be Discussed:

 Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g. Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C. Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration. Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee. 

# Person to Contact for Information:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220. 

Mary W. Dove, 

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-4662 Filed 3-4-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-50391

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CONRADO ARRELLANO-DEPAZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:10-CR-62-1

Before JOLLY, GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Conrado Arrellano-Depaz appeals the sentence imposed following his

guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry of a previously deported alien, arguing

that his sentence is unreasonable because it is greater than necessary to satisfy

the sentencing goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Specifically, he contends that

U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 is not empirically based and that his sentence is greater than

necessary because a prior conviction was used to both increase his offense level

and to calculate his criminal history score. He also argues that the sentence was

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 3, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-50391 Document: 00511337498 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/03/2011
No. 10-50391

unreasonable because his crime was not a crime of violence and because he

reentered this country to work to support his children.

Because Arrellano-Depaz did not raise his empirical data or doublecounting arguments in the district court, they are reviewed for plain error. See

United States v. Peltier, 505 F.3d 389, 391-92 (5th Cir. 2007). His empirical data

argument is foreclosed by this court’s precedent. See United States v. Duarte,

569 F.3d 528, 529-31 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 378 (2009); see also

United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 366-67 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 130 S. Ct. 192 (2009). We have also previously rejected the argument

that the double counting of a defendant’s criminal history necessarily renders a

sentence unreasonable. See Duarte, 569 F.3d at 529-31; see also U.S.S.G.

§ 2L1.2, comment. (n.6).

Arrellano-Depaz’s disagreement with the district court’s balancing of the

§ 3553(a) factors does not suffice to show error in connection with his sentence.

See United States v. Gomez-Herrera, 523 F.3d 554, 565-66 (5th Cir. 2008).

Arrellano-Depaz has not shown that his sentence is unreasonable, and he has

not shown that the presumption of reasonableness should not be applied to his

within-guidelines sentence. See United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th

Cir. 2006). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 10-50391 Document: 00511337498 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/03/2011
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4605]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11671 and <greek-i>11672]


Georgia Disaster <greek-i>GA-00020

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Georgia dated.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 02/20/2009.
    Effective Date: 02/26/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/27/2009.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/26/2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties:
    Thomas.
Contiguous Counties:
    Georgia: Brooks, Colquitt, Grady, Mitchell.
    Florida: Jefferson, Leon.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere...................      4.375
Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere................      2.187
Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere...................      6.000
Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit        4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit             4.500
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Businesses And Non-Profit Organizations without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11671 C 
and for economic injury is 11672 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> are 
Georgia, Florida.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: February 26, 2009.
Darryl K. Hairston,
Acting Administrator.
 [FR Doc. E9-4605 Filed 3-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# Fourth Court o f Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

August 12, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00458

- CV

Frederick Stanton DUNCAN,

Appellant

v.

Shanna Nicole DUNCAN, Appellee s

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016

- CI

- 18794 Honorable David A. Can ales, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant filed a notice of appeal on June 2 8, 2019, which states that “Appellant is presumed indigent and may proceed without paying costs under Rule 20.1

, ” s ee T EX

. R. A PP

. P.
20 .1 , but the notice of appeal did not include a copy of a statement of inability to afform payment of court costs, and the very limited record before us also contains no such statement

.
On August 8, 2019, the Bexar County District Clerk notified this court that Appellant ha s not paid the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and Appellant is not entitled to a free clerk’s

record.

We ORDER Appellant to provide written proof to this court within TEN DAYS of the date of this order that (1) the clerk’s fee has be en paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee, or (2) Appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. See id.

If Appellant fail s to respond as ordered , this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. R. 37.3(b).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand a nd affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of August, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Agritech, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yu Chang, the Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1.  
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




August
      14, 2009
              /s/ Yu ChangChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
No. 09-7995.

#### Steven Jackson, Petitioner v. Illinois.

559 U.S. 947, 130 S. Ct. 1523,

176 L. Ed. 2d 127,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1224.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 387 Ill. App. 3d 1178, 367 Ill. Dec. 212, 981 N.E.2d 537.
No. 09-8685.

#### John Barnes, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1014, 130 S. Ct. 1900,

176 L. Ed. 2d 379,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2597.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
No. 09-7260.

#### Ignacio Reynoso, Petitioner v. David Rock, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility.

559 U.S. 934, 130 S. Ct. 1569,

176 L. Ed. 2d 107,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1238.

February 22, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
No. 11-6390.

#### Rennie Hurtado, Petitioner v. Dave L. Runnels, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 586,

181 L. Ed. 2d 431,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8273.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 428 Fed. Appx. 704.
No. 09-828.

#### Ivan Kuhar, Petitioner v. Marc Glassman, Inc.

559 U.S. 1006, 130 S. Ct. 1890,

176 L. Ed. 2d 364,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2593.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County, denied.
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
  PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gordon F. Burley, Chief Financial Officer of Merritt Ventures
  Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                  

| | By:    | /s/ Gordon F. Burley   
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | GORDON F. BURLEY       
| |        |                        
| | Title: | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | November 13, 2003      

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-25-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-25-2000
<CASH>                                       1,475,564
<SECURITIES>                                   958,564
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,154,958
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,619
<INVENTORY>                                  3,787,287
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,628,208
<PP&E>                                       1,849,792
<DEPRECIATION>                                 769,402
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,375,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,216,803
<BONDS>                                      3,319,518
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           604
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,801,549
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,375,632
<SALES>                                     14,137,444
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,137,444
<CGS>                                       12,862,216
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,862,216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               566,112
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,066
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              71,612
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            500,728
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (3,480)
<NET-INCOME>                                   497,248
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.80


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,






AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO






SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LIN TV Corp. for the three
months ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Vincent L.
Sadusky, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Richard J.
Schmaeling, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:






(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.







Dated:
May 8,
2009                     /s/ Vincent L.
Sadusky


Vincent
L. Sadusky


President
and Chief Executive Officer








Dated:
May 8,
2009                      /s/ Richard J.
Schmaeling


Richard
J. Schmaeling


Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4764 

To amend section 1368 of title 18, United States Code, to include rescue 

dogs in its protection. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2006 

Mr. SIMMONS (for himself, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. WELDON of 

Pennsylvania, Mr. FARR, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. OLVER, 

Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, and Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 1368 of title 18, United States Code, 

to include rescue dogs in its protection. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Canine Volunteer Pro5 tection Act of 2006’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4764 IH 

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF ‘‘POLICE ANIMAL’’ FOR THE PUR2 POSES OF SECTION 1368 OF TITLE 18, UNITED 

3 STATES CODE. 

4 Section 1368(b) of title 18, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘or commissioned’’ after ‘‘em7 ployed’’; and 

8 (2) by inserting ‘‘or participating in search and 

9 rescue missions’’ after ‘‘criminal offenders’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Simon Property Group, Inc. and SPG Realty Consultants, Inc. (the "Companies"), on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen E. Sterrett, Chief Financial
Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/
Stephen E. Sterrett

---

Stephen E. Sterrett
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002

---

QuickLinks
----

Exhibit 31.1 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Yu Chang, certifythat: 

I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CHINA AGRITECH, INC.; 

Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 

Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 

The small businessissuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))******for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

I disclosed in thisreport any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and 

The small businessissuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the smallbusiness issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small businessissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 22, 2006  

/s/ Yu ChangYu Chang Chief Executive Officer and President 

----
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of United Companies Corporation (the
“ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the United
      States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date:November 14,
                  2006
              By:*/s/*Robert
                  M. CarmichaelName:
                  Robert M. CarmichaelTitle:  
                  Chief Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to United Companies Corporation and will
      be
      retained by United Companies Corporation and furnished to the United States
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


EXHIBIT
            32.1
No. 09-8974.

#### Darrell Wayne Maness, Petitioner v. North Carolina.

559 U.S. 1052, 130 S. Ct. 2349,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3027.

176 L. Ed. 2d 568,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina denied.

Same case below, 363 N.C. 261, 677 S.E.2d 796.
No. 09-9065.

#### Gabriel Schaffer, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1021, 130 S. Ct. 1921,

176 L. Ed. 2d 391,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2485.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 586 F.3d 414.