alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016130EN.01000501.xml

| 13.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/5

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran apply

(2016/C 130/03)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 (2).

2

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C — Horizontal Issues Unit |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C — Horizontal Issues Unit

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 359/2011.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

3

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

3

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (adopted pursuantto §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned President andChief Executive Officer of Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company forthe quarterly period ended January 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation of the Company.

 

Date: March 17, 2010

 
|   |                   |
|--------|------------------------|
|   | /s/  Timothy J. Dodd   |
|   |                   |
|   | Timothy  J. Dodd       |
|   | *President  and Chief* |
|   | *Executive Officer*    |

 

1

----
No. 08-1520.

#### City of Dallas, Texas, Petitioner v. Rowan W. Gould, Director, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, et al.

559 U.S. 935, 130 S. Ct. 1499,

176 L. Ed. 2d 108,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1291.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 562 F.3d 712.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4849 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide that individuals who 

are eligible to join the Armed Forces of the United States are also 

eligible to be security screening personnel. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2006 

Mr. OWENS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide that 

individuals who are eligible to join the Armed Forces 

of the United States are also eligible to be security 

screening personnel. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That section 44935(e)(2)(A)(ii) of title 49, United States 

4 Code, is amended to read as follows: 

5 ‘‘(ii) to be eligible to be a security 

6 screener if the individual is eligible to join 

7 the Armed Forces of the United States;’’. 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
# C_2016089EN.01000301.xml

| 5.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/3

---

Notice for the attention of certain persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Iran

(2016/C 89/04)

The following information is brought to the attention of Mr. AHMADI-MOQADDAM (No. 1), Mr. ALLAHKARAL Hossein (No. 2), Mr FAZLI Ali (No. 4), Mr. MOTLAGH Bharam-Hosseini (No. 8), Mr. RADAN Ahmad-Reza (No. 10), Mr. SHARIATI Seyeed Hassan (No. 14), Mr. HADDAD Hassan (No. 16), Mr. SOLTANI Hodjatoleslam Seyed Mohammed (No. 17), Mr. PIR-ABASSI Abbas (No. 23), Mr. MORTAZAVI Amir (No. 24), Mr. SHARIFI Malek Adjar (No. 26), Mr. AKBARSHAHI Ali-Reza (No. 34), Mr. HABIBI Mohammad Reza (No. 40), Mr. JAVANI Yadollah (No. 43), Mr. OMIDI Mehrdad (No. 50), Mr. BAKHTIARI Seyyed Morteza (No. 59), Mr. MOSLEHI Heydar (No. 61), Mr. KAZEMI Toraj (No. 64), Mr. MORTAZAVI Seyyed Solat (No.69), Mr. FAHRADI Ali (No. 73) persons appearing in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) 359/2011 (2) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Iran.

1

2

The Council intends to maintain the restrictive measures against the above-mentioned persons with new statements of reasons. Those persons are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statements of reasons for their designation, before 11 March 2016, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu. |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu.

Any observations received before 18 March 2016 will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review, in accordance with Article 3 of Decision 2011/235/CFSP and Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) No 359/2011.

---

(1)  OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 51.

1

(2)  OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 1.

2

---
No. 09-8476.

#### Daniel B. Karron, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 963, 130 S. Ct. 1555,

176 L. Ed. 2d 153,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1056.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 348 Fed. Appx. 632.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DEAN FRANCIS AUBOL

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 672

[ June 17, 2021 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Bernard I. Bober

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 062013CF010761A88810

.

Dean Francis Aubol, Bristol, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, C IK LIN and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
srer_ex1013.htm


EXHIBIT 10.13


 


ASSIGNMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT 






THIS ASSIGNMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT (the “Assignment”) is made this 3rd day of December, 2010, by and between Synergistic Resources, LLC, a California limited liability company (“Assignor”), and General Health Services, Inc., a California corporation (the “Assignee”).







RECITALS







A.           Assignor is a party to that certain Management Services Agreement dated as of March 1, 2008 by and between Assignor and Kien P. Tran, M.D., Inc. (the “Management Agreement”);







B.           Assignor and Assignee have entered into a Reorganization and Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Agreement”) of even date herewith, wherein Assignor has sold substantially all of its assets to Assignee;







C.           As a condition to the closing of the Asset Agreement, Assignor and Assignee are required to execute this Assignment, with an effective date of December 1, 2010 (the “Effective Date”);







D.           Assignor and Assignee desire to transfer the Management Agreement from Assignor to Assignee.







ASSIGNMENT







1.           Effective as of the Effective Date, Assignor hereby sells, grants, transfers, conveys, assigns, and delivers to Assignee all of Assignor’s right, title, and interest in and to the Management Agreement.







2.           Assignee hereby accepts the assignment of the Management Agreement.







[remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature page to follow]


 




  





1 of 2











  






 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have entered into this Assignment the day and year first above written.








	
“Assignor”

	 	
“Assignee”


	  	 	  
	
Synergistic Resources, LLC,

	 	
General Health Services, Inc.,


	
a California limited liability company

	 	
a California corporation


	  	 	  
	
/s/ Brent Inzer

	 	
/s/ James Pakulis


	
By:

	
Brent Inzer

	 	
By:

	
James Pakulis


	
Its:

	
Manager

	 	
Its:

	
President












The undersigned hereby consents to the assignment of the Management Agreement from Assignor to Assignee as set forth herein.








	
Kien P. Tran, M.D., Inc.

	  
	  	  
	
/s/ Kien P. Tran

	  
	
By:

	
Kien P. Tran

	  
	
Its:

	
President

	  





 




  





2 of 2
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4701 

To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) to extend 

the authorization of appropriations for the Office of Government Ethics 

through fiscal year 2011. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2006 

Mr. CHABOT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the 

Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. 

App.) to extend the authorization of appropriations for 

the Office of Government Ethics through fiscal year 

2011. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Office of Government 

5 Ethics Authorization Act of 2006’’. 
2 

•HR 4701 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIA2 TIONS. 

3 Section 405 of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 

4 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by striking ‘‘2002 through 

5 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘2007 through 2011’’. 

Æ
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and in connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Pinnacle Airlines Corp. for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Phillip H. Trenary, the President and
Chief Executive Officer, and Jesse B. Miller, Chief Financial Officer, hereby
certify that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the registrant.

Signature                     Title                            Date


/s/  Philip H. Trenary        President and Chief Executive    October 28, 2004
-----------------------       Officer (Principal Executive
Philip H. Trenary             Officer)



/s/Jesse B. Miller            Chief Financial Officer          October 28, 2004
-----------------------
Jesse B. Miller
Montana Seventh Judicial District Court. County of Dawson.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- PATRICK J. RONEY, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-15-003

DECISION

On March 15, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced as follows: Count I: A commitment to the Montana Department of Corrections for a period of 13 months for placement in the WATCh Program, for the offense of Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol, 4th or subsequent offense, a felony, in violation of §61-8-401, MCA. If the Defendant completed the program successfully, prior to the 13 months expiring, the balance of the 13 month sentence would be suspended.

Following the commitment to the Montana Department of Corrections for the initial 13 months, the Court ordered the Defendant be committed to the Montana Department of Corrections for four (4) years, all suspended. The four year commitment to the Montana Department of Corrections was ordered to run consecutive to the 13 month sentence. The Defendant was granted credit for time served in the amount of 16 days.

On August 4, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Peter Ohman of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly *80inadequate or clearly excessive.

Done in open Court this 4th day of August, 2016.

DATED this 24th day of August, 2016.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member and Hon. Brad Newman, Member.
No. 11-5575.

#### Daniel Valencia, Petitioner v. Matthew Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

565 U.S. 946, 132 S. Ct. 403,

181 L. Ed. 2d 264,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7310,

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2017444EN.01000202.xml

| 23.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 444/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 444/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8068 — Bunge/Walter Rau Neusser Öl und Fett)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 444/03)

On 20 September 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8068. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8068. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2016366EN.01000101.xml

| 5.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 23 September 2016

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of the Banca d’Italia

(ECB/2016/28)

(2016/C 366/01)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | The mandate of the Banca d’Italia’s current external auditors, PriceWaterhouseCoopers SpA, ended following the audit for the financial year 2015. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2016. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of the Banca d’Italia’s current external auditors, PriceWaterhouseCoopers SpA, ended following the audit for the financial year 2015. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2016.

| (3) | The Banca d’Italia has selected BDO Italia SpA as its external auditors for the financial years 2016 to 2022, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Banca d’Italia has selected BDO Italia SpA as its external auditors for the financial years 2016 to 2022,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that BDO Italia SpA should be appointed as the external auditors of the Banca d’Italia for the financial years 2016 to 2022.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 23 September 2016.

The President of the ECB

Mario DRAGHI

---
FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 10/16/2015 10:10:52 AM PAM ESTES Clerk
No. 09-8292.

#### Corey T. Credell, Petitioner v. South Carolina.

559 U.S. 952, 130 S. Ct. 1540,

176 L. Ed. 2d 135,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1494.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Common Pleas of South Carolina, Orangeburg County, denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7010

JEROME PARKS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RICK JACKSON, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-34-3-MU) Submitted: November 4, 1999 Decided: November 10, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerome Parks, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Jerome Parks seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.Our review reveals that counsel was not ineffective for failing to challenge Parks’ sentence or his indictment. Under North Carolina law, Parks’ sentence was properly enhanced because he had a prior conviction for a Class 1 misdemeanor that was not a traffic offense. See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.14 (1997). Parks’ indictment clearly reflects that he was charged with two separate counts in connection with his crime, and his written plea colloquyreflects that he pled guilty to each count. Thus, counsel’s representation was not deficient for failing to object. See Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 687-91 (1984).Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 09-8808.

#### Sammy Welch, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 986, 130 S. Ct. 1725,

176 L. Ed. 2d 204,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1954.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 333 Fed. Appx. 155.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**THOMAS F. BELLO :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **No. 2287 Disciplinary Docket No. 3**

**Board File No. C1-16-537 (Supreme Court of the State of New York,**  **Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department, No. 2011-05367)**  **Attorney Registration No. 73540 (Out of State)** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 15 th**  **day of September, 2016, having failed to reply to this**  **Court’s directive of August 3, 2016, to provide reasons against the imposition of**  **reciprocal discipline, Thomas F. Bello is disbarred from t he practice of law in this**  **Commonwealth. He is directed to comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.**
No. 11-7671.

#### Sagrario Valdez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1137, 132 S. Ct. 1068,

181 L. Ed. 2d 783,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 523.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.