alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: October 8, 2015 519294 

________________________________

In the Matter of ROBERT P. and 

 Others, Neglected Children.

OTSEGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF 

 SOCIAL SERVICES, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 

Respondent;

SHERRI P., 

Appellant, 

et al.,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: September 9, 2015

Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Garry and Rose, JJ.

__________

Jehed Diamond, Delhi, for appellant.

Steven Ratner, Otsego County Department of Social Services,

Cooperstown, for respondent.

Rosemarie Richards, Gilbertsville, attorney for the

children.

__________

Lahtinen, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Otsego County

(Burns, J.), entered May 7, 2014, which, in a proceeding pursuant

to Family Ct Act article 10, denied respondent Sherri P.'s motion

to dismiss the petition.

Petitioner commenced a Family Ct Act article 10 proceeding

alleging, as is relevant herein, that respondent Sherri P.
-2- 519294 

(hereinafter respondent) neglected her four children (born in

1996, 2000, 2007 and 2013) based upon her misuse of prescription

drugs. On December 9, 2013, respondent stipulated to a finding

of neglect and consented to a dispositional order requiring her

to, among other things, cooperate with and accept services

referred by petitioner, specifically participation in a substance

abuse disorder treatment, and to stay in contact with the

children. In March 2014, petitioner filed a violation petition

alleging that respondent willfully violated the December 9, 2013

order by failing to complete a substance abuse evaluation or

participate in visitation with the children. Respondent moved to

dismiss the petition, asserting that no violation could have

occurred because no written order had been entered with respect

to the December 9, 2013 neglect proceeding. Family Court denied

the motion and this appeal ensued.

We affirm. Although no written order memorializing the

conditions imposed on respondent was entered until after the

violation petition was filed, the transcript of the December 9,

2013 neglect proceeding reflects that respondent appeared with

counsel and stipulated to the imposition of those conditions in

open court. As such, those conditions are binding on respondent

regardless of whether they are reduced to a written order and

entered (see Matter of Dashaun G. [Diana B.], 117 AD3d 1526, 1527

[2014], lv dismissed 24 NY3d 951 [2014]; Matter of W. Children,

226 AD2d 385, 386-387 [1996], lv denied 88 NY2d 811 [1996];

Matter of Kim Shantae M., 221 AD2d 199, 199 [1995]). 

Accordingly, under the circumstances here, respondent's motion to

dismiss was properly denied. 

Peters, P.J., Garry and Rose, JJ., concur.
-3- 519294 

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
No. 11-6495.

#### Terence C. Ridley, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 970, 132 S. Ct. 472,

181 L. Ed. 2d 308,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7505.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 436 Fed. Appx. 238.
No. 09-8995.

#### Ignacio Solis-Garcia, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1020, 130 S. Ct. 1916,

176 L. Ed. 2d 388,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2516.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 351 Fed. Appx. 919.
Montana Eleventh Judicial District Court. County of Flathead.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- IAN FULLER BRANDON, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-14-230

DECISION

On October 2, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a period of ten (10) years, with five (5) years suspended, for the offense of Burglary, a Felony, in violation of §45-6-204(1)(a). This sentence shall run consecutive to the sentence in Cause No. DC-15-343(D).

On February 5, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Jennifer Streano of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is *5AFFIRMED.

Done in open Court this 5th day of February, 2016.

DATED this 29th day of February, 2016.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. John Warner, Member.
No. 09-1024.

#### William Dawson Nursing Center, Inc., Petitioner v. Eduard Adam Glavinskas.

559 U.S. 1049, 130 S. Ct. 2354,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3072.

176 L. Ed. 2d 563,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 392 Ill. App. 3d 347, 332 Ill. Dec. 188, 912 N.E.2d 675.
No. 09-9043.

#### Ronald Pena, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1021, 130 S. Ct. 1919,

176 L. Ed. 2d 390,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2395.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 586 F.3d 105.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> BD

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  239,240                 116,083
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0                       0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                         17,051,954              21,027,263
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,291,194              21,143,346
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0                       0
<PAYABLES>                                     239,240                 116,083
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0                       0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0                       0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,051,954              21,027,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,291,194              21,143,346
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                    0               (805,664)
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                                 0                 204,729
<COMMISSIONS>                                        0                 351,493
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0                       0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<COMPENSATION>                                       0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (235,974)               1,507,765
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   (235,974)               1,507,765
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (235,974)               1,507,765
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.94)                   15.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.94)                   15.32


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
REGISTRANT'S  BALANCE  SHEET  AS OF  FEBRUARY  28,  1998 AND THE  STATEMENTS  OF
OPERATION  AND  STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                                 0000835585
<NAME>                                       C-Phone Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                                   USD
       
<S>                                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                       MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                         FEB-28-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                1
<CASH>                                                 4,200,231
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            519,911
<ALLOWANCES>                                            (173,227)
<INVENTORY>                                            1,641,528
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       6,262,171
<PP&E>                                                 1,130,182
<DEPRECIATION>                                          (966,008)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         6,469,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  1,091,666
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  4,543,767
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                  53,482
<OTHER-SE>                                               780,116
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           6,469,031
<SALES>                                                1,818,663
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       1,890,666
<CGS>                                                  3,209,875
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          3,232,381
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         178,773
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           447
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (5,974,828)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (5,974,828)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (5,974,828)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              (1.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (1.49)
        

</TABLE>
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id: Series title:**  **Labor force status: Type of data:**  **Age: Years:**  **Year Qtr1**  **Qtr2 Qtr3**  **Qtr4 Annual**  **2011** 2380 Unemployed Number in thousands 20 to 24 years 2011 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value** LNU03000036Q **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Unemployment Level - 20-24 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:08:04 PM)
No. 09-7610.

#### Nicie Dillehay, Petitioner v. Department of Housing and Urban Development, et al.

559 U.S. 1033, 130 S. Ct. 1945,

176 L. Ed. 2d 409,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2518.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1154, 130 S. Ct. 1168, 175 L. Ed. 2d 984, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 618.
No. 09-8992.

#### Ellis Harley Barber, Petitioner v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, et al.

559 U.S. 1073, 130 S. Ct. 2099,

176 L. Ed. 2d 731,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3284,

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 334 Fed. Appx. 564.
APP H

 DLA Troop Support 4155.2

 Revised: 28 Nov 23 

CONTRACTOR ABBREVIATION

Ameriqual AQP

Diamond Crystal DIA

Food Life Balanced FLB

Mars Wrigley MAW

Sterling STE

Sopakco SOP

Thermopac TPI

Wornick WOR

The listed contractor abbreviations are provided for use when completing the inspection records.

CONTRACTOR ABBREVIATION (ABV)

TABLE L 1/

1/ If the contractor/processor is not listed in this Table L, please refer to other Table L’s in the remaining 

Oprats Appendices. When all else fails use the abbreviation OTH. If there are more than one 

contractor/processor that’s not listed use numbers after the abbreviation (i.e. OTH1, OTH2, OTH3, etc.)
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GLENDA ES M ER ALDA HERNAN DEZB UR UC A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 71162 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 210- 902 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A ugus t14, 2013 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , G R A B E R , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. G l enda E sm er al da H ernand ez -B uruca, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f E l S al vado r, pet i t i on s pro se for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order de ny i ng he rm ot i on t o r e c ons i de r . O urj ur i s di c t i on i s gove rne d by8 U . S . C . § 1252 a n dwe d i s m i s s He rn an d e z - B u ru c a ’ s p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. 

# FI LED AU G 16 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 71162 2 H e rnande z - B uruc a ’ s pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w i s unt i m e l ybe c aus e s he f i l e d i ton A p r il 2 5 , 2 0 1 1 , m o r e th an 3 0 d ay s a f te rth e B I A ’s d e c is io n o n M ar c h 2 3 , 2 0 1 1 . See 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2(b)(1); Sto n e v . I NS , 51 4 U . S . 38 6, 40 5 (19 95 ) ( the 30 -day f ilin g p e r io df

o rap e titio n f

o rr e v ie w is m an d a to rya n dju r is d ic tio n a l) ; M agtanong v. G on zales , 49 4 F . 3d 11 90 , 11 91 (9th C i r. 20 07 ) ( order) (percuri am ) ( i nt ernal c i t a t i on om i tt e d) ( “ A m anda t oryand j ur i s di c t i ona l rul e c annotbe f or f e i t e d or w a i ve d, and c ourt s l a c k the author i tyt o c r e a t e e qui t abl e e xc e pt i ons t o s uc h a ru le .” ) . W e r e

je c t H e rn an d e z - B u ru c a ’s c o n te n tio n s th a t th e p e titio n w a s tim e ly p u r s u a n t to th e “c o n s tru c tiv e r e c e ip t” ru le o rF e d e r a l Ru le o f A p p e lla te P r oc e dur e 26( a ) ( 3) ( A ) . T hus , w e di s m i s s the pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w f

orl a c k of j ur i s di c t i on. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DI S MI S S E D.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9437]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4566]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. NRC-2009-0040]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request; Correction

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a notice appearing in the Federal 
Register on February 9, 2009 (74 FR 6421) that informs the public of a 
notice of pending NRC action to submit an information collection 
request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and solicitation 
of public comment on the collection ``Billing Instructions for NRC Cost 
Type Contracts (3150-0109).''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Trussell, NRC Clearance 
Officer, Office of Information Services; telephone (301) 415-6445 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#066f68606965696a6a636572752874637569737465634668746528616970"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1a73747c75797576767f796e6934687f69756f68797f5a746879347d756c">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On page 6421, first column, the subject 
heading is corrected to read ``Docket No. NRC-2009-0040'' instead of 
``Docket No. NRC-2008-0040.'' The same change should be made in the 
second column, last paragraph, where the docket number appears twice.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day of February 2009.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Gregory Trussell,
NRC Clearance Officer.
 [FR Doc. E9-4566 Filed 3-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Unassociated Document


EXHIBIT 10.5


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO

SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE







This First Amendment to Secured Promissory Note (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 22nd day of February, 2011 by and between General Cannabis, Inc. (f/k/a LC Luxuries Limited), a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and Keith Hoerling, an individual (the “Holder”).







RECITALS







WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder are parties to that certain Secured Promissory Note dated as of November 19, 2010 in the original principal amount of $900,000.00 (the “Original Agreement”);







WHEREAS, the Maturity Date set forth in the Original Agreement was January 10, 2012;







WHEREAS, both the Company and the Holder desire to amend the terms of the Original Agreement to change the Maturity Date as set forth herein.







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein contained, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:







1.           The Maturity Date as set forth in the Original Agreement shall be changed to June 30, 2012.







2.           Other than as set forth herein, the terms and conditions of Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first written above.








	
“Company”

	  	
“Holder”


	  	  	  
	
General Cannabis, Inc.,

	  	  
	
a Nevada corporation

	  	  
	  	  	  
	
/s/ James Pakulis

	  	
/s/ Keith Hoerling


	
By:           James Pakulis

	  	
By:           Keith Hoerling


	
Its:           CEO
No. 09-8605.

#### Audrone Batavitchene, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

559 U.S. 1013, 130 S. Ct. 1895,

176 L. Ed. 2d 376,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2620.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quinton Cardiology Systems (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael
K. Matysik, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                    By:  /s/ Michael K. Matysik
                                       ---------------------------
                                       Michael K. Matysik
                                       Chief Financial Officer

         Date: November 14, 2003
No. 09-5027.

#### Michael McNeill, Petitioner v. Frank Stamper, et al.

559 U.S. 964, 130 S. Ct. 1571,

176 L. Ed. 2d 154,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1045.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1051, 130 S. Ct. 736, 175 L. Ed. 2d 519, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 8617.
# C_2017346EN.01000302.xml

| 14.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8631 — IFM/PSA/Mersin)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 346/06)

On 29 September 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8631. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8631. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
No. 11A674.

#### Natalie E. Tennant, Secretary of State of West Virginia, et al., Applicants v. Jefferson County Commission, et al.

565 U.S. 1175, 132 S. Ct. 1140,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1014,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 909.

January 20, 2012.

Application for stay, presented to The Chief Justice and by him referred to the Court, granted, and it is ordered that the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, case No. 2:11-cv-0989, entered January 3, 2012, and amended January 4, 2012, is stayed pending the timely filing and disposition of an appeal to this Court.
No. 11-6873.

#### Jason Ford, Petitioner v. Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.

565 U.S. 1084, 132 S. Ct. 825,

181 L. Ed. 2d 535,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8791.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 436 Fed. Appx. 63.