alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Montana Twentieth Judicial District Court. County of Lake.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- ROBERT JAMES MATHEWSON, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-15-053

DECISION

On October 14, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to the Montana State Prison for a term of ten (10) years, for the offense of Bail Jumping, a Felony, as specified in MCA 45-7-308. The Judgment provides that the sentence shall run consecutive to the sentence in DC-14-87. The Defendant received credit for 211 days time served on this offense. The Court further ordered that upon his release from the Montana State Prison, the Defendant shall be transported to the Lake County Jail to serve 5 days for contempt.

On February 4, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant appeared by video conferencing from Crossroads Correctional Center and was represented by Jennifer Streano of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

*16Done in open Court this 4th day of February, 2016.

DATED this 29th day of February, 2016.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

It is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence imposed is clearly excessive in that the Defendant’s failure to appear and failure to complete his Pre-Sentence Interview does not warrant the maximum allowable ten (10) years for bail jumping. It is the Division’s understanding that the Defendant did not leave the area and remained local, despite his failure to follow through. The Division’s decision is to DECREASE the sentence to a term of three (3) years to the Montana State Prison to run consecutively to the sentence in Cause No. DC-14-87. The remaining terms and conditions of the sentence imposed are not clearly inadequate or clearly excessive and are AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. John Warner, Member.
OFFICE OF THE AlT ’ ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN~OO~OY*S 8hr on **Insunnao** (Ilob) tbd,) voltma 1, 6, 8t4ltO6: *An Inouranoe

omtrxot haa been defllrsd ea m wgwmu~~t by tahioh

011% pltity Sor (L8~nside~6ti0ia yranal,sas

to pay nroaey

or its equivalent

or to do some set ai oal~ to kha amlrured upon the Qeutruala whioh the orbor perAPPROVEh 

# c-. OP,N,O.. CCWM, ‘~ er /,~ /II‘--
|             | (1)                                                                              | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                           |   |
|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|             | (2)                                                                              | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |   |
|             |                                                                             |                                                                                                                                                 |
| January 11, 2019 |                                                                             |                                                                                                                                                 |
|             | /s/ Christopher Ensey                                                            |                                                                                                                                                 |
|             | Christopher Ensey, Interim Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |                                                                                                                                                 |
| January 11, 2019 |                                                                             |                                                                                                                                                 |
|             | /s/ Robby Chang                                                                  |                                                                                                                                                 |
|             | Robby Chang, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |                                                                                                                                                 |
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 42 (Thursday, March 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9611-9612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4711]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL09-29-000; Docket No. EL09-30-000]


NorthWestern Corporation; Mountain States Transmission Intertie, 
LLC; NorthWestern Corporation; Notice of Technical Conference

February 25, 2009.
    Take notice that the Commission Staff will convene a technical 
conference in the above-referenced proceedings on Thursday, March 12, 
2009, at 1 p.m. (EDT), in a room to be designated at the offices of the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426.
    At the conference, Commission Staff and interested persons will 
have the

[[Page 9612]]

opportunity to discuss issues associated with the above-mentioned 
filings, including, but not be limited to: rates and service on the 
projects proposed by the filings; distinctions between the two 
projects; open seasons; queue procedures; system configuration and 
siting issues; and requested waivers. The Petitioners \1\ should be 
prepared to address all the concerns raised in the protests, and to 
provide, as necessary, additional support for the filings. A subsequent 
notice will be issued before the conference that will provide details 
of the issues that Staff wishes to discuss.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Petitioners include Northwestern Corporation and Mountain 
States Transmission Intertie, LLC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please 
send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9cfdfffff9efeff5fef5f0f5e8e5dcfaf9eeffb2fbf3ea"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="88e9ebebedfbfbe1eae1e4e1fcf1c8eeedfaeba6efe7fe">[email protected]</span></a> or call toll free (866) 208-
3372 (voice) or (202) 502-8659 (TTY), or send a fax to (202) 208-2106 
with the required accommodations.
    All interested persons are permitted to attend. For further 
information please contact either Timothy Duggan at (202) 502-8326 or 
e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a9fdc0c4c6ddc1d087eddccecec8c7e9cfccdbca87cec6df"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="02566b6f6d766a7b2c46776565636c42646770612c656d74">[email protected]</span></a>, or Katie Detweiler at (202) 502-6426 or 
e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#743f15001d115a30110003111d18110634121106175a131b02"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="92d9f3e6fbf7bcd6f7e6e5f7fbfef7e0d2f4f7e0f1bcf5fde4">[email protected]</span></a>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-4711 Filed 3-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 09-8398.

#### Reymundo Rivero Lazo, Petitioner v. Arizona.

559 U.S. 955, 130 S. Ct. 1549,

176 L. Ed. 2d 140,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1120.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One, denied.
Provisional 11/16

NSN: 

*************************

*MONOGRAPH NO: 

M7D2P

*************************

(LLNS)

Item:

Beverage bases (Powdered), Sweetened with nutritive sweetener, Grape, Fortified with 

ascorbic acid and enhanced with maltodextrin (Type II, Flavor 5, Formulation e)

Document: CID A-A-20098, Beverage Bases (Powdered) and PKG&QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 130 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Dehydrated product: Uniformly blended, free flowing, and a homogenous dry mixture 

free of hard lumps. Granulation can vary from fine powder to small agglomerated 

crystals.

Rehydrated product: Purple grey to blue, sediment free, clear to slightly cloudy.

Odor: Rehydrated product: Sweet grape.

Flavor: Rehydrated product: Sweet Grape.

Texture: Dehydrated product: Free of hard lumps.

Rehydrated product: Fully dissolve within two minutes with constant stirring.

Possible Deteriorative Changes

Appearance: Rehydrated: Coagulated, jelled, surface frothing, or cloudiness, excessive sediment 

significantly affecting aesthetic appearance or flavor.

Odor: Burnt, scorched, moldy/mildew.

Flavor: Oxidized or any other flavor not typical of the type of beverage.

Texture: Lumpy or caked, not free flowing.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Prepare beverage IAW package instructions. Product should dissolve completely within about two 

minutes.

Special Notes
Provisional 11/16

NSN: 

*************************

*MONOGRAPH NO: 

M7D2P

*************************

(LLNS)

If slight sedimentation and clouding are observed but the odor and flavor are normal, do not score the 

sedimentation as a defect during surveillance inspection; make note of it in the narrative for future use. 

Coagulation/gelation may occur if the original formulation was incorrect or if the product has been 

temperature abused for a long time. Coagulation / gelation results in clumps of granules that do not 

readily dissolve when product is reconstituted. Particles tend to float in suspension (look like gel pockets 

or tapioca granules that are clumped together).
No. 09-9057.

#### Norman Evans McElroy, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1021, 130 S. Ct. 1920,

176 L. Ed. 2d 391,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2426.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 353 Fed. Appx. 191.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. §1350

In
connection with the quarterly report of Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Alan P. Niedzwiecki, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.

Date:
March 18, 2011



/S/ ALAN P. NIEDZWIECKIAlan P. NiedzwieckiPresident and Chief Executive Officer
No. 09-921.

#### Elmo Greer & Sons Construction Company, Inc., Petitioner v. David Goff, et al.

559 U.S. 1008, 130 S. Ct. 1910,

176 L. Ed. 2d 367,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2621.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Tennessee, Eastern Division, denied.

Same case below, 297 S.W.3d 175.
Exhibit 32.2

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report (the “Report”) of TCI Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Stephen P. DeSantis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 
| Date: August 17, 2005 | By: /s/ Stephen P. DeSantis

Stephen P. DeSantis

Executive Vice President, 

Chief Financial Officer |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
slfcx_41.htm


Exhibit 4.1


 



Extension of Expiry Time (this “Extension”), dated as of April 5, 2012 (“Effective Date”) by Stellar Pharmaceuticals Inc., organized under the laws of Ontario (the “Company”).


__________







Whereas, the Company issued to the undersigned holder (“Holder”) warrants pursuant to the following warrant certificates (collectively, the “Warrants”):








	
●  

	
Series 1 Warrant Certificate Number ___, representing the right to purchase an aggregate of _____ common shares of the Company, dated October 8, 2010;








	
●  

	
Series 2 Warrant Certificate Number ___, representing the right to purchase an aggregate of _____ common shares of the Company, dated October 8, 2010; and








	
●  

	
Series 3 Warrant Certificate Number ___, representing the right to purchase an aggregate of _____ common shares of the Company, dated October 8, 2010;












Whereas, the Company has determined to extend the Expiry Time (as defined in the Warrants) to 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on April 8, 2013; and







Whereas, the Company is executing this Extension to reflect the extension of the Expiry Time, and delivering this Extension to the Holder for notification purposes and his, her or its acknowledgement thereof.












Section 1.       Extension of Expiry Time.  The Expiry Time of 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on April 8, 2012 shall be extended one year to 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on April 8, 2013.







Section 2.       Effect on the Warrants.  Except as specifically set forth in this Extension, all terms, provisions and conditions of the Warrants shall remain in full force and effect.







Section 3.       Holder Signature.  This Extension shall be deemed effective without regard of whether the Holder executes the acknowledgment hereunder. This Agreement may be executed and delivered by electronic transmission (by facsimile or e-mail as a .pdf attachment), and a faxed or e-mailed signature shall be binding with the same force and effect as original signatures.







[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank; Signature Page Follows]









  





  











  






In witness whereof, the Company has caused this Extension to be signed by its duly authorized officer as of the Effective Date.


 




	 	 	
Stellar Pharmaceuticals Inc.

	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
 

	 	
By: 

	 	 
	 	 	 	Name:	 
	 	 	 	Title:	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Acknowledged:	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
Warrant Holder:

	 	 	    	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
Signature of Holder
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 42 (Thursday, March 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4685]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Tennessee, and 
Wisconsin)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, April 21, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-
231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, April 21, 2009, at 1 p.m. Central Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Ellen Smiley. 
For more information please contact Ms. Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 
414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin 
Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site: 
http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: February 26, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
 [FR Doc. E9-4685 Filed 3-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
No. 09-625.

#### LFP Publishing Group, LLC, dba Hustler Magazine, Petitioner v. Maureen Toffoloni, Administrator and Personal Representative of the Estate of Nancy E. Benoit.

559 U.S. 988, 130 S. Ct. 1689,

176 L. Ed. 2d 206,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1920.

March 1, 2010.

Motion of The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of First Amend*207ment Lawyers Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 625 F.3d 1201.
EXHIBIT 10.28

 

AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

This Amendment to Employment Agreement is entered into this 31st day of December, 2010 between SM Energy Company (f/k/a St. Mary Land & Exploration Company), a Delaware corporation (“SM Energy”), and Anthony J. Best (“Best”).  It amends the Employment Agreement between SM Energy and Best dated May 1, 2006.

 

1.             Amendment to Agreement.  The last sentence of Section 10 is hereby deleted and replaced with the following two sentences:

 

In particular, with respect to the severance payments provided for under Section 9 of this Agreement, such severance payments that would otherwise be made during the Section 409A Six-Month Waiting Period shall be paid in one lump sum upon the expiration of the Section 409A Six-Month Waiting Period, together with simple interest on the amount of each deferred payment at the short term applicable federal rate as of the date of the separation of Best from employment.  For purposes of this Agreement, “termination of employment,” “separation from service” or similar language means separation from service by Best from SM Energy for any reason whatsoever within the meaning of Code Section 409A and Treasury Regulation § 1.409A-1(h).

 

2.             Incorporation of Amendment and Remainder of Agreement.  The terms and provisions of Section 1 of this Amendment are hereby incorporated into the Agreement and, except for the amendment provisions herein contained, all of the terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, unaltered and unchanged by this Amendment.  To the extent that the terms and provisions of this Amendment conflict with the terms and provisions of the Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Amendment shall control.

 

3.             Execution in Counterparts and Delivery of Signature Pages.  This Amendment may be executed in counterparts and signature pages may be delivered by email or facsimile transmission.

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment to the Employment Agreement is hereby duly executed by each party on this 31st day of December, 2010.

 

AGREED:

 

SM ENERGY COMPANY,

a Delaware corporation

 

 

	
By:
    	
/s/   JOHN R MONARK
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
John   R. Monark, Vice President-Human Resources
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   ANTHONY J. BEST
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Anthony   J. Best, CEO & President
No. 11-7679.

#### John Lawson, Petitioner v. Kenneth McKee, Warden.

565 U.S. 1182, 132 S. Ct. 1152,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1024,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 977.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 09-8896.

#### Carlos Contreras, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1017, 130 S. Ct. 1908,

176 L. Ed. 2d 383,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2695.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
No. 11-6897.

#### Sue Zortman, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.

565 U.S. 1108, 132 S. Ct. 1073,

181 L. Ed. 2d 730,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 316.

January 9, 2012.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis *731denied. Petitioner is allowed until January 30, 2012, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Same case below, 611 Pa. 22, 23 A.3d 519.
No. 11-567.

#### Marcy Noriega, Petitioner v. Maria Torres, et al.

565 U.S. 1114, 132 S. Ct. 1032,

181 L. Ed. 2d 739,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 215.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 648 F.3d 1119.