alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----- --------, ...**------.----------------~**

# ~,**l~** 

# ·)\HarriSOn County 

# .!JjIndiana

- USA

# l]~] 

# ..... March 18,2010

Secretary Ray LaHood United States Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 

### Harrison County Economic Development Corporation 310 North Elm Street· Corydon, IN 47112 812-738-2137 www.hcedcindiana.org

I am writing to express strong support for the application ofDelta Air Lines for new nonstop service between Detroit and Hanedain Tokyo. Approval ofDelta's new service would be a major benefit for ourregion, where many corporations have strong trade and market presence with Japan. There are almost 250 Japanese companies located in Indiana and hundreds more whose business activities rely on access to Japan and its market. The growth ofIndianabusiness ties with Japan has created demand for increased capacity to Tokyo. Many Indiana corporate representatives would realize a competitive advantage by flying into Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport. in'diapapolis40es not offer international service to Asia, and many ofour business travelers use Detroit as their hub when flying to Japan. Detroit is a proven and successful gateway to Asia and is an airport that can support trans-pacific routes. This summer Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the commitment Deltamade to DTWto make 

### itthe airline's gateway to Asia. The addition ofHaneda as a destination is a natural fit that would clearly benefit the many businesses in South Central Indianathat have regular business inJapan.
Thank you for consideration ofthisrequest.



### ,

# sincere~

# f.Ji­**~lvoelker** ',,'

Director

.
No. 09-8164.

#### William Justin Brewster, Petitioner v. David Mills, Warden.

559 U.S. 976, 130 S. Ct. 1694,

176 L. Ed. 2d 189,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2197.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors, NIAMS. 

The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of individual other conducted by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, including consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         Board of Scientific Counselors, NIAMS.                     

*Date:*                         March 16-17, 2009.                       

*Time:*                         5:30 p.m. to 6 p.m.                       

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate personal qualifications and performance, and competence of individual investigators.                       

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Building 31, 31 Center Drive, Room 4C32,   Bethesda, MD 20892.                       

*Contact Person:*                         John J. O'Shea, MD, PhD, Scientific Director, National Institute of Arthritis & Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases,   Building 10, Room 9N228, MSC 1820,   Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-2612,                         *osheaj@arb.niams.nih.gov*.                     

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 26, 2009. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

 [FR Doc. E9-4615 Filed 3-3-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
| **Exhibit 32.2** |
|------------------|

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

| March 29, 2007

  | By:    | /s/                                Harry N. Stout |   |
|------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| (Date)

          |   | Harry N. Stout

President

                                                                                                                                                                                  |   |

 

 

 

 

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4471]

[[Page 9245]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Federal Open Market Committee; Domestic Policy Directive of 
January 27 and 28, 2009

    In accordance with Sec.  271.25 of its rules regarding availability 
of information (12 CFR part 271), there is set forth below the domestic 
policy directive issued by the Federal Open Market Committee at its 
meeting held on January 27 and 28, 2009.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\[thinsp]Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open Market 
Committee at its meeting held on January 27 and 28, 2009, which 
includes the domestic policy directive issued at the meeting, are 
available upon request to the Board of Governors of the Federal 
Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 20551. The minutes are published in 
the Federal Reserve Bulletin and in the Board's annual report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial 
conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable 
growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee 
seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds 
trading in a range of 0 to \1/4\ percent. The Committee directs the 
Desk to purchase GSE debt and agency-guaranteed MBS during the 
intermeeting period with the aim of providing support to the mortgage 
and housing markets. The timing and pace of these purchases should 
depend on conditions in the markets for such securities and on a 
broader assessment of conditions in primary mortgage markets and the 
housing sector. By the end of the second quarter of this year, the Desk 
is expected to purchase up to $100 billion in housing-related GSE debt 
and up to $500 billion in agency-guaranteed MBS. The System Open Market 
Account Manager and the Secretary will keep the Committee informed of 
ongoing developments regarding the System's balance sheet that could 
affect the attainment over time of the Committee's objectives of 
maximum employment and price stability.
    By order of the Federal Open Market Committee, February 19, 2009.

Brian F. Madigan,
Secretary, Federal Open Market Committee.
[FR Doc. E9-4471 Field 3-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4978 

To require the Comptroller General to conduct a study on the extent to 

which security operations at United States seaports are managed by 

nationals of foreign countries and other related matters. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2006 

Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To require the Comptroller General to conduct a study on 

the extent to which security operations at United States 

seaports are managed by nationals of foreign countries 

and other related matters. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Secure America Port 

5 Accountability Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STUDY AND REPORT BY COMPTROLLER GENERAL. 

7 (a) STUDY.—The Comptroller General shall conduct 

8 a study on the following: 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4978 IH 

1 (1) The extent to which security operations at 

2 United States seaports are managed by nationals of 

3 foreign countries, including— 

4 (A) an identification of the foreign coun5 tries involved; 

6 (B) the general responsibilities and au7 thorities that the contracts accord to the for8 eign nationals; and 

9 (C) the extent to which the contracts make 

10 it possible for the foreign nationals to engage in 

11 activities that could impact on the security of 

12 the ports. 

13 (2) Any incident in which foreign nationals de14 scribed in paragraph (1) have been charged with, or 

15 convicted of, criminal conduct involving security op16 erations at United States seaports. 

17 (3) A review of United States contracts to man18 age or supply United States seaports, taking effect 

19 after December 31, 2001, with respect to the vulner20 ability of such seaports to threats to the national se21 curity of the United States, including an examina22 tion of— 

23 (A) the number of such contracts awarded, 

24 including the bid the number of international 

25 parties represented in the contracts; 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4978 IH 

1 (B) the extent of oversight before the con2 tract was awarded and during the length of the 

3 contract; and 

4 (C) the relationship, if any, between the se5 curity breaches at the United States seaports 

6 and the ownership or management of the sea7 ports. 

8 (4) A review of the vulnerability of the ten larg9 est United States seaports to threats to the home10 land security of the United States, including threats 

11 involving enemy infiltration, cargo shipping, and 

12 passenger safety, among others. 

13 (b) REPORT.—Not later than July 30, 2006, the 

14 Comptroller General shall submit to the Committee on 

15 Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and 

16 the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 

17 Affairs of the Senate a report on the results of the study 

18 required by subsection (a). 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
No. 09-7367.

#### Donald C. Richardson, Petitioner v. Michigan State Treasurer.

559 U.S. 1059, 130 S. Ct. 2368,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3043.

176 L. Ed. 2d 578,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1124, 130 S. Ct. 1080, 175 L. Ed. 2d 905, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 409.
No. 09-8675.

#### Samuel E. Baker, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 983, 130 S. Ct. 1717,

176 L. Ed. 2d 199,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1905.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 333 Fed. Appx. 894.
No. 09-9342.

#### Craig Caldwell, Petitioner v. Florida Parole Commission.

559 U.S. 1090, 130 S. Ct. 2382,

176 L. Ed. 2d 765,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3563.

April 26, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

Same case below, 25 So. 3d 1225.
**EXHIBIT 12.1**CONSOLIDATEDFIXED CHARGE COMPUTATION FOR SOLECTRON CORPORATION (in millions):                       **Year Ended August 31**   **2006**  **2005**  **2004**  **2003**  **2002** Earnings (losses):                    Net income (loss) $133.2  $3.4  $(177.4) $(3,452.6) $(3,109.7)Cumulativeeffect of change in accounting principle, net  0.8   —   —   —   — Discontinued operations (income) loss, net of tax  (15.6)  (13.9)  (85.0)  443.7   40.4 Income tax (benefit) expense  (1.3)  15.7   (3.3)  525.5   (450.0)                Income (loss) from continuing operations beforeincome tax (benefit) expense $117.1  $5.2  $(265.7) $(2,483.4) $(3,519.3)Add back: fixed charges  46.9   78.7   172.1   236.2   271.2                 Earnings(losses) before fixed charges  164.0   83.9   (93.6)  (2,247.2)  (3,248.1)                Earnings(losses) from continuing operations before fixed charges                    Fixed Charges:                    Interest portion of rent expenses $18.4  $22.2  $26.8  $29.1  $33.6 Interest expense  28.5   56.5   145.3   207.1   237.6                 Total Fixed Charges $46.9  $78.7  $172.1  $236.2  $271.2                                      Ratio ofearnings from continuing operations to fixed charges  3.5   1.1   —   —   —                                      Deficiency of earnings to fixed charges $—  $—  $(265.7) $(2,483.4) $(3,519.3)
No. 09-8726.

#### Michael Anthony Corbin, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 996, 130 S. Ct. 1748,

176 L. Ed. 2d 220,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2258.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 349 Fed. Appx. 935.
# C_2017398EN.01000102.xml

| 24.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8518 — MDP/HPS/Nevada/Towergate)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 398/02)

On 15 November 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8518. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8518. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION


I, William A. Sutherland, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Exhaust Technologies,
Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects,  the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

         a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that
material  information  related to the  registrant  is made known to us by others
within the entity, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and  procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the  filing  date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c)  presented  in this  quarterly  report  our  conclusions  about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equvalent function):

         a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and I have  indicated  in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date: November 18, 2003            /s/ William A. Sutherland
                                   -------------------------
                                   Chief Financial Officer
407 P.2d 951

#### STATE RACING COMMISSION, State of Arizona, ex rel. Darrell F. SMITH, Attorney General, State of Arizona, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF COCHISE, and the Honorable William C. Frey, Judge thereof, Respondent, Fred A. Hill, Real Party In Interest. ARIZONA RACING COMMISSION, Tom Finley, Lew Place, Buell E. Tade, Frank S. Waitman, and Donald Butler, Members, Appellants, v. Fred A. HILL, Appellee.

Nos. 2 CA-CIV 167, 2 CA-CIV 172.

Court of Appeals of Arizona.

Nov. 22, 1965.

Darrell F. Smith, Atty. Gen., Philip M. Haggerty, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for petitioner and appellants.

Royal & Carlson, by Peter Chase Neumann, Tucson, for real party in interest and appellee.

HATHAWAY, Judge.

Fred A. Plill made application to the Arizona Racing Commission for a racing permit pursuant to A.R.S. § 5-107. He sought a permit to conduct greyhound dog racing in Cochise County, Arizona, near Benson.

The Arizona Racing Commission denied Hill’s application and he appealed from that decision to the Superior Court pursuant to A.R.S. § 5-108, subsec. E as amended. The Superior Court found that Hill was entitled to have the racing permit issued and ordered the Arizona Racing Commission to issue a permit to conduct dog racing upon the posting of a cash deposit and bond *271to be fixed by the Arizona Racing Commission.

The Arizona Racing Commission appeals from the Superior Court judgment and its order denying their motion for a new trial.

The Attorney General of the State of Arizona, on behalf of the Arizona State Racing Commission, has also petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus directing the Superior Court to issue a stay of execution pending appeal.

It appears that a definite procedure for reviewing the decisions of the Arizona Racing Commission is provided by A.R.S. § 5-108, subsec. E as amended. There is no provision for an appeal from the decision of the Superior Court. Unless the right of appeal is given by statute, there is no such right. Ginn v. Superior Court, 1 Ariz.App. 455, 404 P.2d 721, 723 (1965). It further appears that the administrative review act expressly does not afford judicial review of a final decision of an administrative agency “ * * * where the act creating or conferring power on an agency or a separate act provides for judicial review of the agency decisions and prescribes a definite procedure for the review.” A.R.S. § 12-902, subsec. A; also see State ex rel. Morrison v. Thomas, 80 Ariz. 327, 334, 297 P.2d 624 (1956); Duncan v. Truman, 74 Ariz. 328, 331, 248 P.2d 879 (1952).

We therefore hold there is no provision for the appeal to this court and the appeal is dismissed. The petition for .writ of mandamus has consequently become moot and is likewise dismissed.

KRUCKER, C. J., and MÓLLOY, J., concur.
EXHIBIT 32


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-Q of  Mission  West
Properties,  Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly  period ended March 31, 2005
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  each of Carl E.  Berg,  Chairman  of the Board  and Chief  Executive
Officer  of the  Company,  and Wayne N. Pham,  Vice  President  of  Finance  and
Controller of the Company,  hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as
adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to the best of
his knowledge, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/ Carl E. Berg
--------------------------------------------
Carl E. Berg
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
November 4, 2005

/s/ Wayne N. Pham
--------------------------------------------
Wayne N. Pham
Vice President of Finance and Controller
November 4, 2005

This  certification   accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  or  otherwise  required,  be  deemed  filed by the
Company  for  purposes  of ss. 18 of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
amended.