alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
October 24, 2013

Kevin D. Schlemmer, Chief

Essential Air Service & Domestic Analysis Division

U.S. Department ofTransportation

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE

Washington, DC 20S90

RE: Order 2013-10-3

Servicing Kalaupapa, Hawaii

Dear Mr. Schlemmer;

On behalf of the Kalaupapa Lions Club and its members, I would like to express our 100% satisfaction

with the service we have been receiving from Makani Kai Air this past year. They are one of only a

handful of companies that I have dealt with that actually listen to our concerns and try their best to

accommodate. Many times they have gone above and beyond normal business protocol to address our

special circumstances here in Kalaupapa. They even purchased a lift for the Kalaupapa airport to assist

the patients/passengers with embarking and departing their planes.

They have met with this community several times to solicit our input on the scheduling of flights and

luggage restrictions. We, of course, are thrilled with the lower and fairer prices on the flights.

We also are pleased with the professional and courtesy staff at Makani Kai Air from the reservationist to

the pilots and everyone in between. We all have been embraced by them, employees and owners, and

fell like they in return are a part of our 'ohana.

We whole heartedly support reissuing of the Essential Air Service contract to Makani Kai Air for servicing

Kalauapapa.

Sincerely,

Clarence "Boogie" Kahilihiwa

President

Kalaupapa Lions Club
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly  Report of United  Companies  Corporation
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.


Date:    August 12, 2005                By:      /s/ Robert M. Carmichael
                                                 -------------------------------
                                        Name:    Robert M. Carmichael
                                        Title:   Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required  by  Section  906,  has been  provided  to United  Companies
Corporation and will be retained by United  Companies  Corporation and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 11-7473.

#### Alvin Eason, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1132, 132 S. Ct. 1053,

181 L. Ed. 2d 772,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 237.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

*773Same case below, 643 F.3d 622.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4396]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-63,971]


Trim Masters, Inc., Automotive Technology Systems Division, 
Including On-Site Leased Workers From Employment Plus and Modern 
Personnel, Lawrenceville, IL; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 
Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on September 22, 2008, applicable to workers of 
Trim Masters, Inc., Automotive Technology Systems Division 
Lawrenceville, Illinois. The notice was published in the Federal 
Register on October 8, 2008 (73 FR 58981).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of automotive interior door panels and seats.
    New information shows that workers leased from Employment Plus and 
Modern Personnel were employed on-site at the Lawrenceville, Illinois 
location of Trim Masters, Inc., Automotive Technology Systems Division. 
The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently 
under the control of Trim Masters, Inc., Automotive Technology Systems 
Division to be considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Employment Plus and Modern 
Personnel working on-site at the Lawrenceville, Illinois location of 
the subject firm.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers employed at Trim Masters, Inc., Automotive Technology Systems 
Division, Lawrenceville, Illinois who were secondarily affected by 
increased imports of automotive interior door panels and seats.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-63,971 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Trim Masters, Inc., Automotive Technology Systems 
Division, including on-site leased workers from Employment Plus and 
Modern Personnel, Lawrenceville, Illinois, who became totally or 
partially separated from employment on or after September 2, 2007 
through September 22, 2010, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also 
eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under 
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 18th day of February 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-4396 Filed 3-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
No. 09-8815.

#### Gregory Lawrence Moore, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, et al.

559 U.S. 1001, 130 S. Ct. 1906,

176 L. Ed. 2d 358,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2479.

March 22, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

Same case below, 351 Fed. Appx. 975.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. §1350**

In connection with the amendedquarterly report of Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,William B. Olson, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates andfor the periods indicated. 

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission forpurposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. 

Date: June 13, 2006
No. 09-8502.

#### P. S., et al., Petitioners v. Franklin County Children Services.

559 U.S. 1011, 130 S. Ct. 1887,

176 L. Ed. 2d 372,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2716.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Franklin County, denied.
No. 09-8903.

#### Edward MacKenzie, Petitioner v. New York.

559 U.S. 1017, 130 S. Ct. 1908,

176 L. Ed. 2d 383,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2658.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



                Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K of  Patriot  Scientific
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended May 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
E.  Wallin,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1)   the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2)   the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                  /s/ JEFFREY E. WALLIN
                                                  Name:  Jeffrey E. Wallin
                                                  Title:  President and CEO
                                                  Date: August 28, 2003
Exhibit 35.10



|     |  |                                                                                                          
|---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing D1050-084, 8th
Fl 401 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2017, by and among UBS COMMERCIAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIZATION CORP., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, AEGON USA REALTY ADVISORS, LLC, as Fairmont at Brewerytown Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO
BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates Series 2017-C4 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify
that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from October 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such
period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of
February 2018.



LOGO

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice
President

Wells Fargo Bank



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
No. 09M75.

#### Ernest Miller, Petitioner v. California.

559 U.S. 1002, 130 S. Ct. 1933,

176 L. Ed. 2d 358,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2623.

March 22, 2010.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
No. 09-9099.

#### Shawn Tull, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1022, 130 S. Ct. 1923,

176 L. Ed. 2d 392,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2357.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 352 Fed. Appx. 127.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-2629

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Arthur Robert Neal, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: November 15, 2010 Filed: February 9, 2011

___________ Before SMITH, BEAM, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In July 2009, a grand jury charged Arthur Neal in a two-count indictment with, generally stated, the production of ch ild pornography, and possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) and (e), and § 2252A(a)(5)(B) and (b)(2), respectively. Neal pleaded guilty to the production charge and the court 1 dismissed the possession charge on the government's motion.

1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Un ited States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.In support of Neal's guilty plea, he s tipulated that in approximately 2008 he induced a thirteen-year-old female to e ngage in sexually e xplicit conduct for the purpose of producing visual depictions of the same. Neal knew the thirteen-year-old victim because he occasionally supervised he r. The photographs at issue in the instant case were discovered by Neal's former roommate in April 2009 in the trailer that the two had shared. In December 2008, the victim disclosed to her school nurse that she had been sexually abused by Neal. Fo llowing this disclosure, the local Child Protection Center conducted a videotaped interview with the victim where she repeated the accusation.
At sentencing, Neal objected to the c ourt's admission and consideration of the videotaped recording of the victim's allegations of abuse, arguing that the video was not reliable evidence and that the minor victim should testify. The district court admitted the out-of-court statement after conducting a thorough review on the record regarding the reliability of the video in light of what the court vi ewed as corroborating evidence in the case. On app eal, Neal claims the district court abused its discretion in finding that the hearsay statement of th e minor victim was sufficiently reliable for consideration at sentencing. He claims th at the absence of a courtroom confrontation leaves ample room for mistaken decision-making on these facts.

We review the decision to admit the vi ctim's hearsay statement for sentencing purposes for abuse of discretion, recognizi ng that the right of confrontation does not apply in sentencing proceedings. United States v. Bastian , 603 F.3d 460, 466-67 (8th Cir. 2010); United States v. Brown , 430 F.3d 942, 944 (8th Cir. 2005); United States v. Wallace , 408 F.3d 1046, 1048 (8th Cir. 2005). H earsay is admissible in sentencing proceedings so long as it bears some indicia of reliability. United States v. Schlosser , 558 F.3d 736, 740 (8th Cir. 2009). Here, the district court was thorough and concise in its colloquy articulating the indicium of reliability as to the video interview. On this record we find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
-2-
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-05-00705- CV Te xa s D e par tm e ntof P ublicSafe ty , A ppe lla nt

v. Devin Matt hew Gonzalez, Appellee

F ROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF HAY S COUNTY NO. 9264- C, HO NORAB LE HO WARD S. WARNER II, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Appellant Te x as Department of Public Safe ty moves to dismis s this appeal. We gr a nt the mot ion

and dis mis s th is a

pp e a l. A ll o the r p e nd ingmot ion s a re dis mis se d a s mo ot.

G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore J ustices B . A. Smith, P uryear and Waldrop Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: Apr il 28, 2006
No. 09-1153.

#### Donn Carswell, et al., Petitioners v. Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources, et al.

559 U.S. 1071, 130 S. Ct. 2136,

176 L. Ed. 2d 728,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3323.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii denied.

Same case below, 120 Haw. 417, 209 P.3d 194.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3560 

To provide assistance for the operation of the Lewis and Clark National 

Historic Trail Visitor Center in Nebraska City, Nebraska, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 27, 2019 

Mr. FORTENBERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide assistance for the operation of the Lewis and 

Clark National Historic Trail Visitor Center in Nebraska 

City, Nebraska, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LEWIS AND CLARK NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL 

4 OPERATIONAL ASSISTANCE. 

5 Section 342(f) of Public Law 110–229 is amended— 

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘, visitor center,’’ after ‘‘his7 toric site’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3560 IH

1 (2) by striking ‘‘per year for a period not to ex2 ceed 10 years’’ and inserting ‘‘for each of fiscal 

3 years 2019 through 2028’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 3.1.11

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                     TO THE

                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                                  TEMPCO, INC.

         Pursuant to Section 78.385 and 78.390 of the Nevada Revised Statutes,
the undersigned corporation, Tempco, Inc., a Nevada corporation, submits the
following Certificate of Amendment for filing:

1. The name of the corporation is Tempco, Inc.

2. A new Article SIXTEENTH shall to be added to the Company's Articles of
Incorporation as follows:

         SIXTEENTH. A share dividend, division or combination of the
         corporation's capital stock may be effected by action of the Board of
         Directors alone, without the approval of the shareholders. In effecting
         a division or combination of the capital stock, the Board of Directors
         may amend these Articles to increase or decrease the par value of
         shares of capital stock, increase or decrease the number of authorized
         shares of capital stock, and make any other change necessary to assure
         that the rights or preferences of the holders of all outstanding shares
         of any class or series will not be adversely affected by the division
         or combination. For purposes of this Article SIXTEENTH, an increase or
         decrease in the relative voting rights of the shares of capital stock
         that are the subject of the division or combination that arises solely
         from the increase or decrease in the number of shares outstanding is
         not an adverse effect on the outstanding shares of any class or series,
         including any increase in the percentage of authorized shares remaining
         unissued arising solely from the elimination of fractional shares. The
         Board of Directors may adopt a procedure whereunder the fractional
         shares that result from action taken pursuant to this Article SIXTEENTH
         are eliminated and the holders thereof compensated in a manner that
         complies with applicable law and that the Board of Directors finds to
         be fair to such holders.

3. The vote by which the shareholders holding shares in the corporation
entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such
greater proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote
by classes or series, or as may be required by the provisions of the Articles of
Incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is: 51.5%

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Tempco, Inc., a Nevada corporation, has caused this
Certificate of Amendment to be signed in its name and on its behalf, on this
30th day of September, 2009.

                                        TEMPCO, INC., a Nevada corporation


                                        /s/ Stanley L. Schloz
                                        ---------------------
                                        Stanley L. Schloz, President
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2022

- 2 545

_____________________________
M ICHAEL W ILLIS M ITCHELL II
, Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jennie Kinsey , Judge

. August 23, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. O STERHAUS , C.J., and R OWE and L ONG , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Kathryn Lane, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Heather Ross, Assistant Attorney General
, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
No. 09-884.

#### J. B. L., Petitioner v. Texas.

559 U.S. 1037, 130 S. Ct. 2064,

176 L. Ed. 2d 414,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2794.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-*415tiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District, denied.
No. 09-9031.

#### Peter Anthony Cantu, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

559 U.S. 1073, 130 S. Ct. 2102,

176 L. Ed. 2d 733,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3326.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 341 Fed. Appx. 55.