alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-6617.

#### Larry Lee Butler, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 1051, 132 S. Ct. 776,

181 L. Ed. 2d 476,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8319.

November 28, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied, and petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
No. 09-8707.

#### Othniel McKinney, Sr., Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 984, 130 S. Ct. 1719,

176 L. Ed. 2d 201,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1969.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 350 Fed. Appx. 885.
No. 11-656.

#### Betty Barber, et al., Petitioners v. Paychex, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 1179, 132 S. Ct. 1146,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1020,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 926.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 439 Fed. Appx. 841.
3 March 2010 ******************************

NSN: 8905 01 582 6663 (CBBQ) * MONOGRAPH NO: FS1-08

 ******************************

Item: Chicken Breast Fillets, Seasoned, in Flexible Pouches, Barbecue sauce (Type II)

Document: CID A-A-20361 Chicken Breast Fillets, Seasoned, in Flexible Pouches and 

PKG&QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 140 calories Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Seasoned chicken breast fillets: fully cooked, boneless, skinless fillets with a natural 

chicken breast shape and intact; prominent grill marks on the surface; brown exterior 

and tan interior from the absorbed sauce.

Barbecue sauce: reddish brown in color with spice flecks; moderately thick and glossy.

Odor: Cooked chicken in a sweet tangy barbecue sauce.

Flavor: Cooked chicken in a sweet tangy barbecue sauce.

Texture: Moist and tender, and not dry, fibrous, or rubbery.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance:

Seasoned chicken breast fillets: Exterior and interior excessively darkened or off 

colored.

Barbecue sauce: Excessively darkened or off colored, syneresis.

Odor: Rancid, chemical flavor, scorched.

Flavor: Rancid, chemical flavor, scorched.

Texture: Dry, tough, fibrous, or rubbery.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

Thermoprocessed chicken is typically darker than unprocessed cooked chicken. Grill marks need to be 

on both sides of breast.
No. 09-8774.

#### Cuatemoc Peribian-Gonzalez, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 985, 130 S. Ct. 1723,

176 L. Ed. 2d 203,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1938.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 353 Fed. Appx. 853.
# C_2016417EN.01000601.xml

| 11.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 417/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 417/6

---

EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2015

(2016/C 417/20)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/corporate/pub/afr15

---
Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 6, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131984 & (54) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. STEVEN G. SICKLES, ANNAMARIE F. Stephen J. Markman, SICKLES, and SARAH L. SICKLES, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellants/

Cross-Appellees, 

and 

ANNETTE M. SICKLES,

 Plaintiff/Counter DefendantAppellant/Cross-Appellee, 

v SC: 131984 

 COA: 266722 

St. Clair CC: 04-002442-CZ 

HOMETOWN AMERICA, LLC, 

Defendant/Counter PlaintiffAppellee/Cross-Appellant, 

and 

STERN CONSTRUCTION & TRANSPORT, LLC, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 13, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE that part of the judgment of the Court of 

Appeals that found the defendants immune from suit under MCL 600.2918(3) because 

“plaintiffs’ allegations unquestionably directly arose as a result of the eviction performed 

by Hometown America and its agent.” Slip op, p 5. The plain language of MCL 

600.2918(3) provides immunity only for actions undertaken pursuant to an order of 

eviction. Accepting the plaintiffs’ well-pleaded factual allegations as true, and 

construing them in a light most favorable to the plaintiffs, certain of the defendants’ 

actions, including the conversion and destruction of plaintiffs’ property in a manner that 

was neither necessary to effect the eviction nor incidental to the process of eviction, 

cannot be said as a matter of law to be within the scope of the July 7, 2004 order of 

eviction, and hence, may not have been undertaken pursuant to that order. Thus, the 
 _________________________________________ 

 

2 

circuit court erred in granting summary disposition to the defendants under MCR 

2.116(C)(7). We REMAND this case to the St. Clair Circuit Court for further 

proceedings not inconsistent with this order. The application for leave to appeal as crossappellant is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should 

be reviewed by this Court. 

s0403 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 5, 2007 

 Clerk
No. 09-8602.

#### Michael Glasper, Petitioner v. Illinois.

559 U.S. 983, 130 S. Ct. 1714,

176 L. Ed. 2d 198,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2170.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.

Same case below, 234 Ill. 2d 173, 334 Ill. Dec. 575, 917 N.E.2d 401.
**
**EXHIBIT 31**

**Certifications**

I,Richard Simpson, certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this report onForm 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report onForm 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2017-P8 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of RegulationAB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and 

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reportshave been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; KeyBank National Association; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; CoreLogic Commercial Real EstateServices, Inc.; National Tax Search, LLC; Principal Real Estate Investors, LLC; LNR Partners, LLC; Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC; AEGON USA Realty Advisors, LLC; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas; and Park BridgeLender Services LLC. 

Date: November 27, 2019 

 

 

/s/ Richard Simpson

Richard Simpson

President, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

 
CGCMT 2017-P8 Certifications (2018) 

**
No. 11-5271.

#### Mark A. Gleason, Petitioner v. California.

565 U.S. 1076, 132 S. Ct. 806,

181 L. Ed. 2d 517,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8411.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 898, 132 S. Ct. 290, 181 L. Ed. 2d 175, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5524.
************************

• MONOGRAPH NO.: 1C8

************************

ITEM: SCRAMBLED EGGS, SHELF STABLE, COOKED (SEC)

NSN: 8940 01 453 1139 Tray Can ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR-E-002

8940 01 470 3097 Polymeric PCR-E-005

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Plain scrambled eggs. Golden yellow color, only slightly darker than

that of the typical cooked yellow egg. Practically free of starch lumps, air

pockets, or void areas.

ODOR: Slightly cooked egg odor. Odor typical of scrambled eggs. Free from

foreign odors.

FLAVOR: Typical of a cooked egg product. Slightly salty. Free from foreign

flavors.

TEXTURE: Moist tender egg mixture. Slightly spongy, but not rubbery.

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36 months

 100 DEGREES F: 12 months

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

Appearance: Color may become slightly darker, especially at the surface.

Odor: Cooked egg aroma will become more noticeable.

Flavor: Product flavor will become more noticeable.

Texture: Eggs might become firmer and slightly rubbery.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: none
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Section 302Certification**

I, Robert W.Marsik, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this annual report on form 10-KSB of Mercari Communications Group, Ltd.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small businessissuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the small business issuer, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.   Designed such disclosure control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting got be designed under our supervision,to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reportingand the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordancewith generally accepted accounting principles;

c.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d.   Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the this fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and theaudit committee of the small issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a.   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.

Date: October6, 2005

By: /s/  Robert W. Marsik
No. 09-8724.

#### LaAnthony Cletae Cain, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 984, 130 S. Ct. 1719,

176 L. Ed. 2d 201,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1963.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
No. 11-6218.

#### James D. Lawson, Petitioner v. Eddie Sword, et al.

565 U.S. 1175, 132 S. Ct. 1138,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1012,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 603.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 1016, 132 S. Ct. 554, 181 L. Ed. 2d 400, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7968.
No. 09-8720.

#### Brian Keith Smith, Petitioner v. Thomas Simpson, Warden.

559 U.S. 1015, 130 S. Ct. 1903,

176 L. Ed. 2d 379,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2649.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2016490EN.01001401.xml

| 30.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 490/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 490/14

---

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 March 2016 to 31 March 2016

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1))

1

(2016/C 490/04)

—   Modification of a marketing authorization (Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council): Accepted

Modification of a marketing authorization

Accepted

| Date of the decision | Name of the medicinal product | Holder of the marketing authorization | Number of the entry in the Community Register | Date of notification |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 15.3.2016 | Purevax RCP FeLV | Merial
  29 avenue Tony Garnier, F-69007 Lyon, France | EU/2/04/048 | 17.3.2016 |
| 22.3.2016 | Zuprevo | Intervet International B.V.
  Wim de Körverstraat 35, NL-5831 AN Boxmeer, Nederland | EU/2/11/124 | 25.3.2016 |

Date of the decision

Name of the medicinal product

Holder of the marketing authorization

Number of the entry in the Community Register

Date of notification

15.3.2016

Purevax RCP FeLV

Merial

29 avenue Tony Garnier, F-69007 Lyon, France

EU/2/04/048

17.3.2016

22.3.2016

Zuprevo

Intervet International B.V.

Wim de Körverstraat 35, NL-5831 AN Boxmeer, Nederland

EU/2/11/124

25.3.2016

Anyone wishing to consult the public assessment report on the medicinal products in question and the decisions relating thereto is invited to contact:

| European Medicines Agency |
| --- |
| 30 Churchill Place |
| Canary Wharf |
| London E14 5EU |
| United Kingdom |

European Medicines Agency

30 Churchill Place

Canary Wharf

London E14 5EU

United Kingdom

---

(1)  OJ L 136, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

---
No. D-2464.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Manny M. Aragon.

559 U.S. 968, 130 S. Ct. 1734,

176 L. Ed. 2d 208,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1968.

March 1, 2010.

Manny M. Aragon, of Albuquerque, New Mexico, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
11 December 2013 *************************

NSN: 8940-01-479-1850 (PCC) * MONOGRAPH NO: M10Q

 *************************** 

Item: Pretzels, Filled pretzels, Cheddar cheese (Type II, Style F, Flavor 1)

Document: A-A-20195, Snack Foods and PKG&QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 220 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Puffed or extruded cylindrical pretzel shell surrounding a cheese filling. 

Shell: Golden brown exterior color with a hard glossy surface.

Filling: Orange-brown.

Odor: Shell: Baked wheat flour.

Flavor: Shell: Baked wheat flour.

Filling: Slightly tangy cheddar cheese.

Texture: Shell: Crunchy.

Filling: Soft, slightly chalky.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Crushed, broken; darkening of exterior or filling.

Odor: Rancid, stale, scorched or other non-typical odor.

Flavor: Rancid, stale, scorched or other non-typical flavor.

Texture: Slightly soft to soft exterior, extremely hard, difficult to bite, crumbly filling.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

Serviceability is significantly affected if more than 30 percent of filled pretzels are broken per pouch.
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of AKI, Inc. and AKI Holding Corp.
(collectively,  the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending  December 31,
2002 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I,  William J. Fox,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.


/s/ William J. Fox
-----------------------
William J. Fox
Chief Executive Officer
February 12, 2003
No. 11-7793.

#### Andre Van, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1170, 132 S. Ct. 1123,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1002,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 698.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 423.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 30, 2012

jam 

# Order

July 30, 2012

145563 (22)

CARNELL MCCREARY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 145563
COA: 307837 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Ju stice, the motion to waive f ees is considered and it
is DENIED because MCL 600.2 963 requires that a prisone r pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $4.00, shall submit a copy of this order with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned
with this order. Failure to comply with this orde r shall result in the appeal not being
filed in this Court. If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to plain tiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of $371.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full.
The Clerk of the Court sh all furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANt )

PR 06-0544

IN RE PETITION OF KASSANDRA J. BUSS FOR

REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN THE

BAR OF MONTANA

An 1 0 r21

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Suprerra Court

State of Montana

ORDER

Kassandra J. Buss has petitioned the Court for reinstatement to active status in the

State Bar of Montana. Buss was placed on inactive status for failing to comply with the

Rules for Continuing Legal Education for the reporting year ending March 31, 2021. Buss

has provided a letter from the State Bar certifying that Buss has now completed all CLE

requirements for that reporting year, in accordance with Rule 13 of the CLE Rules. The

Petition states that Buss is not currently subject to disciplinary proceedings and has not

committed any acts or omissions sanctionable under the Rules of Professional Conduct

while on inactive status. Good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Kassandra J. Buss for reinstatement

to active status in the State Bar of Montana is GRANTED. Upon payment of any remaining

dues, fees, and the state license tax to the State Bar of Montana, Buss shall be reinstated.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the

State Bar of Montana.

DATED this 6 day of August, 2021.

Chiefju e -t5

08/10/2021

Case Number: PR 06-0544
Li.r.,,,..4-i 

eSU Al JVL

J ustices

2
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4717 

To designate the National Museum of Wildlife Art, located at 2820 Rungius 

Road, Jackson, Wyoming, as the National Museum of Wildlife Art of 

the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2006 

Mrs. CUBIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Resources 

A BILL 

To designate the National Museum of Wildlife Art, located 

at 2820 Rungius Road, Jackson, Wyoming, as the National Museum of Wildlife Art of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE 

4 UNITED STATES. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The National Museum of Wild6 life Art, located at 2820 Rungius Road, Jackson, Wyo7 ming, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘National Mu8 seum of Wildlife Art of the United States’’. 
2 

•HR 4717 IH 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the museum referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the National Museum of 

5 Wildlife Art of the United States. 

Æ
No. 11-6018.

#### Robert Boehm, et ux., Petitioners v. Andrea Evans, Chairperson, New York State Division of Parole.

565 U.S. 1159, 132 S. Ct. 1091,

181 L. Ed. 2d 983,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 775.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judicial Department, denied.

Same case below, 79 App. Div. 3d 1445, 914 N.Y.S.2d 318.