alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4630]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; Center for AIDS Intervention Research Core Support.
    Date: March 27, 2009.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Enid Light, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental 
Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 
6132, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20852-9608, 301-443-0322, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1471787d737c605479757d783a7a7d7c3a737b62"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a1c4cdc8c6c9d5e1ccc0c8cd8fcfc8c98fc6ced7">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 26, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
 [FR Doc. E9-4630 Filed 3-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of  Section  1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned  officer of Scotia Pacific Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

     (a) the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2006 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:   August 9, 2006

                                                 /S/     GEORGE A. O'BRIEN
                                                         George A. O'Brien
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code).
```
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Reward Enterprises,
  Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended Septermber
  30, 2003, as filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
  (the Quarterly Report), I, Joseph Vigliarolo, Chief Financial Officer
  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Quarterly Report fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934; and                              
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                              
|2. | in information contained in the Quarterly
        Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of the Company.

Date: December 18, 2003

/ s/ Joseph Vigliarolo

Joseph Vigliarolo

Chief Financial Officer

---
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4688 Reported in Senate (RS)]







                                                       Calendar No. 491
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4688


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 6, 2006

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             June 22, 2006

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 1 Boyden Street in Badin, North Carolina, as the ``Mayor John 
            Thompson `Tom' Garrison Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1 
Boyden Street in Badin, North Carolina, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Mayor John Thompson `Tom' Garrison Memorial Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mayor John Thompson `Tom' 
Garrison Memorial Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 491

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4688

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 1 Boyden Street in Badin, North Carolina, as the ``Mayor John 
            Thompson `Tom' Garrison Memorial Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 22, 2006

                       Reported without amendment`
No. 11-5620.

#### Joseph Taylor, Petitioner v. Joseph Visinsky, et al.

565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1082,

181 L. Ed. 2d 800,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 474.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 947, 132 S. Ct. 406, 181 L. Ed. 2d 266, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7341.
No. 09-7684.

#### Anthony L. Davis, Petitioner v. United States, et al.; and Anthony L. Davis, Petitioner v. Kansas State Board of Indigent Defense Services, et al.

559 U.S. 1033, 130 S. Ct. 1945,

176 L. Ed. 2d 409,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2442.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1129, 130 S. Ct. 1095, 175 L. Ed. 2d 913, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 388.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4687 

To ease the transition of National Guard and Reserve members adversely 

affected by the closure or realignment of reserve component facilities 

by authorizing their temporary detail to duty with other reserve component units. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2006 

Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To ease the transition of National Guard and Reserve members adversely affected by the closure or realignment 

of reserve component facilities by authorizing their temporary detail to duty with other reserve component units. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4687 IH 

1 SECTION 1. DETAIL OF RESERVE COMPONENT MEMBER TO 

2 DUTY WITH ANOTHER RESERVE COMPONENT 

3 UNIT FOLLOWING CLOSURE OR REALIGN4 MENT OF RESERVE COMPONENT FACILITY AT 

5 WHICH THE MEMBER SERVED. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1213 of title 10, United 

7 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing new section: 

9 ‘‘§ 12504. Reserve component members: temporary de10 tail to another reserve component unit 

11 following base closure or realignment 

12 ‘‘(a) DETAIL.—At the request of a member of a re13 serve component described in subsection (b), the Secretary 

14 concerned may detail the member to duty with another 

15 unit of the same reserve component or a unit of a different 

16 reserve component under the jurisdiction of that Sec17 retary. To the maximum extent practicable, the Secretary 

18 shall accommodate the requests of members for detail 

19 under this subsection. 

20 ‘‘(b) ELIGIBLE MEMBERS.—To be eligible for detail 

21 under subsection (a), a member of a reserve component 

22 must have been assigned, immediately before requesting 

23 the detail— 

24 ‘‘(1) to duty at a reserve component facility ap25 proved for closure or realignment pursuant to a base 

26 closure law; or 
3 

•HR 4687 IH 

1 ‘‘(2) to duty with a unit of the reserve compo2 nents relocated pursuant to a base closure law to a 

3 location more than 100 miles from the residence of 

4 the member. 

5 ‘‘(c) DURATION OF DETAIL.—The detail of a reserve 

6 component member under subsection (a) may not exceed 

7 two years. 

8 ‘‘(d) FUNDING.—If a reserve component member is 

9 detailed to another reserve component under subsection 

10 (a), the expenses of the member while so detailed shall 

11 be paid from appropriations for the reserve component 

12 from which the member was detailed. Payable expenses 

13 include allowances for subsistence and housing under sec14 tions 402 and 403 of title 37 and expenses for medicine 

15 and medical attendance.’’. 

16 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

17 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding 

18 at the end the following new item: 

‘‘12504. Reserve component members: temporary detail to another reserve component unit following base closure or realignment.’’. 

Æ
No. 09-9040.

#### James D. Lyons, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1073, 130 S. Ct. 2102,

176 L. Ed. 2d 733,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3378.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-3049

___________________________

Alberto Anguiano

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Dallas County Jail Under Sheriff; Jail Staff; Doug Lande; Sandy, Lt.;

Renshaw-Roll, Sgt.; Toller, Lt.

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines

____________

 Submitted: January 6, 2015

Filed: January 28, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
Inmate Alberto Anguiano appeals the district court’s preservice dismissal of 1

his civil action in which he requested that criminal charges be brought against the

named defendants for opening his legal mail. Following careful review of the record

and Anguiano’s brief, we conclude that the court did not err in dismissing the case, 

because Anguiano lacked standing to seek criminal charges against defendants. See

Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619 (1973); Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781,

783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (de novo review). Accordingly, we affirm, and we

also deny the pending motions. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern 1

District of Iowa.

-2-
No. 09-9436.

#### Lawrence Ringer, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1056, 130 S. Ct. 2365,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3026.

176 L. Ed. 2d 574,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 350 Fed. Appx. 210.
----

**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to**

**Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)**

**as Adopted Pursuant to****Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Yu Chang, the Chief Executive Officer of China Agritech, Inc., certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China Agritech, Inc.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: May 15, 2007

 

**/s/ Yu Chang**

Yu Chang

Chief Executive Officer

----
^ 

U.S. Depirtment of TranspwrtaHon 

OtfKB Qt ihe Socrtiary of Transponwiofi 

rhiel' Documeiitnry Services Div 

Depaamcnl oC rransponntion 

Wiishrngmn, U C 20590 

DESIGNATION O F AGEN T FOR 

SERVICE O F NOTICE, PROCESS , ORDERS 

DECISIONS AND REQUIREMENT S 

ATTENTION: DOCKE T SECTION. C-5S 

i-:GO 

AirTransat A.T. Inc. 

{Name orCompany; please priiil) 

, Imving its principal 

office al 5959 Cote Vertu Boulevard, Montreal, Quebec H45 2EG CANADA 

(Address) 

hereby designates, pursuant to section 46103 of Tiilc 49 of the U.S. Code (formerly section 1005(b} of the Federal Aviation Act of 

1958, as amended) the person named below as its Agent upon whom service of all r\otices and process and all orders, decisions, and 

requirements of the Deportment of Transportation may be made for and on behalf of said canier. hereby canceling all previous 

designations of agents made by it to the DOT. 

Name of Agent John E. Gillick, Esq. 

(Please Print) 

Address Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, LLP, 888 17*^ Street, NW, Suite 700, Washington DC 20006 

The Agent so designated has written his name snd also his initials in the folluwing space: 

Name ^ t . K ^ (Initials) ^ t A 

mWIfNESS WHEREOF, Air Transat A.T. Inc. has caused these 

(Name o f Company) 

presents to be signed in its name by Allen B. Graham , President 

(Please Print) 

of said company, and to be attested under its corporate seal by 

\ J . [ J (Secretary, or othir Title) ' ' > ) 

this V ^ day of A^T^t- ,ASi, j^OA-A 

ATTEST: 

OSTF 1010.5 (l-95> 

AirTransat A.T. Inc.
No. 09-8715.

#### In re Fontella Dorsey, Petitioner.

559 U.S. 1004, 130 S. Ct. 1902,

176 L. Ed. 2d 405,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2391.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
No. 09-890.

#### William Havens, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 992, 130 S. Ct. 1748,

176 L. Ed. 2d 214,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2300.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 330 Fed. Appx. 920.
No. 09-394.

#### Saudi American Bank, Petitioner v. SWE&C Liquidating Trust, Successor in Interest to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation.

559 U.S. 936, 130 S. Ct. 1569,

176 L. Ed. 2d 109,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1162.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 335 Fed. Appx. 202.
No. 11-6956.

#### Michael Maier, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1045, 132 S. Ct. 601,

181 L. Ed. 2d 440,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8194.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 646 F.3d 1148.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 11

                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


                                                  Year Ended December 31,
                                               1996          1995        1994
                                           ----------   ----------   ----------

Primary

Weighted average Premier common shares
  outstanding during the year               2,351,535    2,262,520    1,966,308

Common shares issuable in connection
  with assumed exercise of options under
  the treasury stock method                    33,862       28,402       11,234
                                           ----------   ----------   ----------
Total                                       2,385,397    2,290,922    1,977,542
                                           ==========   ==========   ==========

Net income                                 $2,539,716   $1,988,949   $  291,148
                                           ==========   ==========   ==========

Per share earnings                         $     1.06   $     0.87   $     0.15
                                           ==========   ==========   ==========
No. 09-8496.

#### Edward Jerome Hopkins, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 982, 130 S. Ct. 1711,

176 L. Ed. 2d 197,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2120.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
KOGER EQUITY, INC. DOES NOT FILE A CLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET, THEREFORE THESE NOT
PROVIDED. 5-02(9), 5-02(21)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,952
<ALLOWANCES>                                       440
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         994,919
<DEPRECIATION>                                 137,452
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 885,739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        351,528
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           288
<OTHER-SE>                                     467,538
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   885,739
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               160,093
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,665
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,090
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   349
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,893
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,947
<INCOME-TAX>                                       187
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,586
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,586
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.35


</TABLE>
No. 11-7989.

#### Juan Hernandez-Ortiz, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1184, 132 S. Ct. 1158,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1029,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1001.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 433 Fed. Appx. 592.
No. 09-9693.

#### Iran Dwayne Ketchup, Petitioner v. Joe D. Driver, Warden.

559 U.S. 1083, 130 S. Ct. 2131,

176 L. Ed. 2d 751,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3244.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 341 Fed. Appx. 869.