alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1637

ADEPEJU SHERIFA GIWA, Petitioner, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A75-367-398) Submitted: April 9, 2003 Decided: August 6, 2003 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Irena Izabella Karpinski, LAW OFFICES OF IRENA KARPINSKI, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Allen W. Hausman, Aviva L. Poczter, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Adepeju Sherifa Giwa, a native and citizen of Nigeria, seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her applications for asylum and withholding of deportation. We have reviewed the administrative record, the Board’s order and the IJ’s decision and find substantial evidence supports the Board’s affirmance of the IJ’s conclusion that Giwa failed to establish a well-founded fear of persecution necessary to qualify for asylum. See 8 C.F.R. § 208.13(b) (2002). The standard for receiving withholding of deportation is “more stringent than that for asylum eligibility.” Chen v. INS , 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999). An applicant for withholding mustdemonstrate a clear probability of persecution. INS v. CardozaFonseca , 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). As Giwa has failed to establish refugee status, she cannot satisfy the higher standard for withholding of deportation. We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-30633

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Miquon Rachal, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:20-CR-261-1

Before Higginbotham, Higginson, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Miquon Rachal has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Rachal has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 2, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-30633 Document: 00516303630 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/02/2022
No. 21-30633

2

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-30633 Document: 00516303630 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/02/2022
No. 09-8409.

#### William Reed Jenkins, III, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 956, 130 S. Ct. 1550,

176 L. Ed. 2d 141,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1419.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 578 F.3d 745.
No. 09-8522.

#### Billy Ray Tatum, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 982, 130 S. Ct. 1712,

176 L. Ed. 2d 198,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2138.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 348 Fed. Appx. 963.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 13 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk March 1 3 , 2019

158130(8 8 )

15 8132 ( 4 9 )

PEOPLE O F THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 15 8130

v COA: 3 37329

Monroe CC: 16

- 242675

- FH

JONTELE SWANSON

- DEVILL GOODWIN

, Defendant

- Appellant

.

__________ _______________________________

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 158132

v COA: 338266

Monroe CC: 16

- 243088

- FC

JONTELE SWANSON

- DEVILL GOODWIN

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the second motion s of defendant

- appellant to extend

the time for filing a n amended application for leave to appeal are GRANTED

. The

amended application submitted on March 11 , 2019

, is accepted for filing

.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-65,280] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 18, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Eaton Corporation, Mentor, Ohio. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of February 2009. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-4550 Filed 3-3-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, April 15, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Wednesday, April 15, 2009, at 2 p.m. Pacific Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Janice Spinks. For more information please contact Ms. Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                          ( print page 9695)    

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: February 26, 2009.

Shawn F. Collins,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

 [FR Doc. E9-4665 Filed 3-4-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Training, Knowledge and Opportunities (TKO) Seminar

Email this event to me @

Invalid Email Address!Invalid Email Address!

Start Date/Time:

Tuesday, November 5, 2024 8:00 AM

End Date/Time:

Wednesday, November 6, 2024 4:00 PM

Recurring Event:

One time event

Importance:

Normal Priority

Category:

Meetings/Training/Seminars

Location:

Virtual/Online

Description:

The TKO seminar is a course that teaches vendors how to start doing business with DLA. Vendors learn how to find open solicitations, how to submit a quote through the DLA Internet Bid Board System (DIBBS), the procedures for viewing/downloading drawings, and how to use Invoicing, Receipt, Acceptance and Property Transfer (iRAPT) to get paid. There are also many other relevant topics of discussion. All sessions are free and held virtually.

Training is provided by DLA Land and Maritime in Columbus, Ohio, but benefits all DLA suppliers.

Registration must be made in advance.

Make reservations at: https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJIscO-hrz4pGoYhHo4SavHYNqzKAMv1llQ

Enrolled Users:

Alandra Jones

                - Return
                - 
                - Export
REGISTRATION

 83222-1 

Vol.2 
1
2
3
4
5
6 *Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
Pages 7-11 - *Confidential Statements of Formula may be entitled to confidential treatment*
12
13
14
15
16
17 *Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
Pages 18-22 - *Confidential Statements of Formula may be entitled to confidential treatment*
23 *Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
24 *Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
25
26
27
Pages 28-32 - *Confidential Statements of Formula may be entitled to confidential treatment*
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68

*Confidential Statement of Formula may be entitled to confidential treatment*
69

*Confidential Statement of Formula may be entitled to confidential treatment*
70
71 *Confidential Statement of Formula may be entitled to confidential treatment*
72 *Confidential Statement of Formula may be entitled to confidential treatment*
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86 *Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
# C_2017120EN.01000101.xml

| 13.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 31 March 2017

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of the Nationale Bank van België/Banque Nationale de Belgique

(ECB/2017/8)

(2017/C 120/01)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | The mandate of the Nationale Bank van België/Banque Nationale de Belgique’s current external auditors, Ernst & Young Bedrijfsrevisoren/Réviseurs d’Entreprises, ended after the audit for the financial year 2016. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2017. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of the Nationale Bank van België/Banque Nationale de Belgique’s current external auditors, Ernst & Young Bedrijfsrevisoren/Réviseurs d’Entreprises, ended after the audit for the financial year 2016. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2017.

| (3) | The Nationale Bank van België/Banque Nationale de Belgique has selected Mazars Réviseurs d’entreprises/Mazars Bedrijfsrevisoren SCRL/CVBA as its external auditors for the financial years 2017 to 2022, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Nationale Bank van België/Banque Nationale de Belgique has selected Mazars Réviseurs d’entreprises/Mazars Bedrijfsrevisoren SCRL/CVBA as its external auditors for the financial years 2017 to 2022,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that Mazars Réviseurs d’entreprises/Mazars Bedrijfsrevisoren SCRL/CVBA should be appointed as the external auditors of the Nationale Bank van België/Banque Nationale de Belgique for the financial years 2017 to 2022.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 31 March 2017.

The President of the ECB

Mario DRAGHI

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4817 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4817

 To prohibit entities owned or controlled by foreign governments from 
       carrying out operations at seaports in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 2006

 Mr. Hayworth introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the 
 Committee on International Relations, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit entities owned or controlled by foreign governments from 
       carrying out operations at seaports in the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON OPERATION OF U.S. SEAPORTS BY CERTAIN FOREIGN 
              ENTITIES.

    (a) Requirement.--No entity that is owned or controlled by a 
foreign government may--
            (1) conduct operations at any seaport in the United States; 
        or
            (2) enter into any contract or other agreement to conduct 
        such operations.
    (b) Regulations.--The President shall promulgate such regulations 
as may be necessary to enforce the requirements of subsection (a), 
including requiring any person to furnish, in the form of reports or 
otherwise, such information as is necessary to enforce such 
requirements.
    (c) Penalties.--Any person who violates any requirement of 
subsection (a) or any regulation promulgated under subsection (b) shall 
be subject to the penalties under section 206 of the International 
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1705) to the same extent as 
such penalties apply to violations under that Act.
    (d) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Foreign government.--The term ``foreign government'' 
        includes any agency or instrumentality of a foreign government.
            (2) United states.--The term ``United States'' means the 
        several States, the District of Columbia, and any commonwealth, 
        territory, or possession of the United States.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall be effective as of February 28, 2006.
                                 <all>
```
No. D-2461.

#### In the Matter of Disbarment of Thomas E. Finnerty.

559 U.S. 1035, 130 S. Ct. 2087,

176 L. Ed. 2d 433,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2792.

March 29, 2010.

Disbarment order entered.

Former order, 558 U.S. 1044, 130 S. Ct. 793, 175 L. Ed. 2d 552, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 8476.
EXHIBIT 12.3

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Moshe Reuveni, certify that:

     1. I HAVE REVIEWED THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F OF HEALTHCARE
TECHNOLOGIES LTD.

     2. BASED ON MY KNOWLEDGE, THIS ANNUAL REPORT DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY UNTRUE
STATEMENT OF A MATERIAL FACT OR OMIT TO STATE A MATERIAL FACT NECESSARY TO MAKE
THE STATEMENTS MADE, IN LIGHT OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH SUCH STATEMENTS
WERE MADE, NOT MISLEADING WITH RESPECT TO THE PERIOD COVERED BY THIS ANNUAL
REPORT;

     3. BASED ON MY KNOWLEDGE, THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AND OTHER FINANCIAL
INFORMATION INCLUDED IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT, FAIRLY PRESENT IN ALL MATERIAL
RESPECTS THE FINANCIAL CONDITION, RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS OF THE
REGISTRANT AS OF, AND FOR, THE PERIODS PRESENTED IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT;

     4. THE REGISTRANT'S OTHER CERTIFYING OFFICERS AND I ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR
ESTABLISHING AND MAINTAINING DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES (AS DEFINED IN
EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14) FOR THE REGISTRANT AND HAVE:

     A) DESIGNED SUCH DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES TO ENSURE THAT MATERIAL
     INFORMATION RELATING TO THE REGISTRANT, INCLUDING ITS CONSOLIDATED
     SUBSIDIARIES, IS MADE KNOWN TO US BY OTHERS WITHIN THOSE ENTITIES,
     PARTICULARLY DURING THE PERIOD IN WHICH THIS ANNUAL REPORT IS BEING
     PREPARED;

     B) EVALUATED THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REGISTRANT'S DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND
     PROCEDURES AS OF A DATE WITHIN 90 DAYS PRIOR TO THE FILING DATE OF THIS
     ANNUAL REPORT (THE "EVALUATION DATE"); AND

     C) PRESENTED IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT OUR CONCLUSIONS ABOUT THE EFFECTIVENESS
     OF THE DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES BASED ON OUR EVALUATION AS OF THE
     EVALUATION DATE;

     5. THE REGISTRANT'S OTHER CERTIFYING OFFICERS AND I HAVE DISCLOSED, BASED
ON OUR MOST RECENT EVALUATION, TO THE REGISTRANT'S AUDITORS AND THE AUDIT
COMMITTEE OF REGISTRANT'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS (OR PERSONS PERFORMING THE
EQUIVALENT FUNCTION):

     A) ALL SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES IN THE DESIGN OR OPERATION OF INTERNAL
     CONTROLS WHICH COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE REGISTRANT'S ABILITY TO RECORD,
     PROCESS, SUMMARIZE AND REPORT FINANCIAL DATA AND HAVE IDENTIFIED FOR THE
     REGISTRANT'S AUDITORS ANY MATERIAL WEAKNESSES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS; AND

     B) ANY FRAUD, WHETHER OR NOT MATERIAL, THAT INVOLVES MANAGEMENT OR OTHER
     EMPLOYEES WHO HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN THE REGISTRANT'S INTERNAL
     CONTROLS; AND

     6 THE REGISTRANT'S OTHER CERTIFYING OFFICERS AND I HAVE INDICATED IN THIS
ANNUAL REPORT WHETHER OR NOT THERE WERE SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS
OR IN OTHER FACTORS THAT COULD SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECT INTERNAL CONTROLS SUBSEQUENT
TO THE DATE OF OUR MOST RECENT EVALUATION, INCLUDING ANY CORRECTIVE ACTIONS WITH
REGARD TO SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES AND MATERIAL WEAKNESSES.

Date:  August 5, 2003

                                    /S/ MOSHE REUVENI
                                    MOSHE REUVENI
                                    Chief Executive Officer
No. 09-7697.

#### Freddy Lee Foots, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1071, 130 S. Ct. 2091,

176 L. Ed. 2d 728,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3276.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 340 Fed. Appx. 969.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 4, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51074 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARIO OLALDE-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:06-CR-84-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Mario OlaldeGarcia raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.