alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6671

JAMIE GOSS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JOSEPH MCFADDEN, Warden, Lieber Correctional Institution,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. 

(4:14-cv-01299-MGL)

Submitted: October 29, 2015 Decided: November 4, 2015

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamie Goss, Appellant Pro Se. Alphonso Simon, Jr., Assistant 

Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney 

General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jamie Goss seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The 

district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge 

recommended that relief be denied and advised Goss that failure 

to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive 

appellate review of a district court order based upon the 

recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate 

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review 

of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have 

been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. 

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Goss has waived appellate 

review by failing to timely file objections. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
409 P.2d 739

#### The STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Darwin Nelson WHITE, Appellant.

No. 2 CA-CR 46.

Court of Appeals of Arizona.

Jan. 18, 1966.

Darrell F. Smith, Atty. Gen.,' Norman- E) Green, Pima County Atty., Tucson) -for appellee. ' ■ :

O. G. Marquez, Tucson, for appellant!

KRUCKER, Chief Judge.

Appellant, Darwin Nelson White, was complained against for assault with intent to commit an infamous crime against nature, in violation of A.R.S. § 13-252. At his arraignment before the Justice of the Peace he was advised of his rights to counsel and waived a preliminary hearing.

An information was filed in the Superior Court of Pima County on April 1; Í965', !and counsel was duly appointed. ' ' ‘

Defendant’s counsel moved for a hearing under the provisions of Rules of Criminal Procedure No. 250, Vol. 17 A.R.S. After due hearing the court found that deféáda'nt was able to assist in his defense and. understands the proceedings and the nature of the charge against him.

Defendant entered a plea of guilty to the crime charged and on May 26, 1965, was sentenced to the Arizona State Prison for a term of not less than seven nor more-than eight years. - - - - ,,,

Notice of appeal was duly filed and.the record on appeal forwarded to this Court.

On December 13, 1965, defendant’s counsel filed in this Court a memorandum stat*456iiig that no error could be found from a complete examination of the entire record and that defendant’s constitutional rights had been fully protected at all stages of the proceedings and that while the sentence was severe it was within the statutory limits and that there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court.

This Court has examined the record and we agree with defendant’s counsel that We, can find no error in the record. In view of the doctrine laid down in State v. Burrell, 96 Ariz. 233, 393 P.2d 921 (1964); Rugg v. Burr, 1 Ariz.App. 488, 404 P.2d 832 (1965); State v. Shumway, 2 Ariz.App. 39, 406 P.2d 241 (1965); and State v. Garrett, 2 Ariz.App. 227, 407 P.2d 416 (1965), we hold that this is a groundless appeal and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

HATHAWAY and MOLLOY, JJ., concur.
# C_2017284EN.01000102.xml

| 29.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8286 — RHI/Magnesita Refratários)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 284/02)

On 28 June 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8286. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8286. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT
31.2



EDISON
NATION, INC.

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OR 15d-14 OF

THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I,
Brett Vroman, certify that:



|1. | I
    have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Edison Nation, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December
    31, 2019; and                                                                                                                                                                
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|2. | Based
    on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
    to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
    to the period covered by this report;



|Date:
    June 4, 2020 | /s/
    Brett Vroman                            
|---------------------- | ------------------------------------------------
|                       | Brett
    Vroman                                
|                       | Chief
    Financial Officer                     
|                       | (Principal
    Financial and Accounting Officer)
# C_2016348EN.01000202.xml

| 23.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 348/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 348/2

---

Commission Communication

(2016/C 348/04)

The European Capital of Culture for 2020 will be Rijeka, Croatia.

---
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Maximum Dynamics, Inc. a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Joshua Wolcott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of
         the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Maximum Dynamics, Inc., and will be retained by Maximum Dynamics,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



/s/ Joshua Wolcott
--------------------------
Joshua Wolcott
Chief Financial Officer
August 16, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Colony NorthStar Credit Real Estate, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin P. Traenkle, Chief Executive Officer and President of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                        
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 23, 2018 |  | /s/ Kevin P. Traenkle                                  
|                     |  | Kevin P. Traenkle
Chief Executive Officer and President

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C §1350 and shall not be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of A

. L

. P.

, a Child

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 9

- 00 144

- CV

Trial court case number: 1 8

- DCV

- 25244 3

Trial court: 505 th District Court of Fort Bend County

A ppellant, C.J.M. , ha s filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s final decree of

termination signed on January 28, 201 9

. On April 2, 2019, a ppellant filed a motion requesting that we reconsider our March 21, 2019 order dismissing as moot his motion

for an extension of time to file the record and extend the deadline to file t he reporter’s

record

. The reporter’s record was filed in this appeal on April 8, 2019. A ccordingly, appellant’s motion, filed on April 2, 2019, is dismiss ed as moot

.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ April 16, 2019

____
# C_2017223EN.01000201.xml

| 12.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8059 — Investindustrial/Black Diamond/Polynt/Reichhold)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 223/03)

On 12 May 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8059. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8059. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDY JANG, on behalf of himself and

others similarly situated,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

ASSET CAMPUS HOUSING, INC.; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 17

- 55757

D.C. No.

2:15

- cv

- 01067

- JAK

- PLA

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

John A. Kronstadt, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 10, 2018 **

Pasadena, California

Before: HURWITZ and OWENS, Circuit Judges, and PRESNELL, *** District

Judge.

Andy Jang appeals from the district court’s summary judgment in his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Gregory A. Presnell, United States District Judge for

the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

OCT 12 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

putative class action alleging that a fee charged when he paid his rent using a credit

card violated California Civil C ode § 1748.1. As the parties are familiar with the

facts, we do not recount them here. We affirm.

Jang argues that the district court erred in determining that section 1 748.1, as

applied here, violated the First Amendment. However, this issue is controlled by

our intervening decision in Italian Colors Restaurant v. Becerra , 878 F.3d 1165,

1179 (9th Cir. 2018), which held that section 1748.1, as applied to those plaintiffs,

violated the First Amendment. Contrary to Jang’s contention, Italian Color s is not

distinguishable.

Because we affirm the district court’s summary judgment, we do not reach

Jang’s argument s concerning the denial of class certification. See Hodgers

- Durgin

v. de la Vina , 199 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 1999).

AFFIRMED

.
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 10

- 00297

- CR

Armando BUSTAMANTE

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas

, Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009

- CR

- 11762

Honorable Sharon MacRae , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 12, 2010

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss h is appeal. The motion is granted, and this appeal

is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
No. 09-8276.

#### Peter Roy Alfred, Jr., Petitioner v. Fortch-Wade Correctional Center, et al.

559 U.S. 979, 130 S. Ct. 1703,

176 L. Ed. 2d 193,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2005.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 354 Fed. Appx. 58.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated February 4, 1997, accompanying the consolidated 
financial statements of Citizens Gwinnett Bankshares, Inc. for the year ended 
December 31, 1996, included in on Form 10-K for Premier Bancshares, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 1998. We hereby consent to the incorporation by 
reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Premier Bancshares, 
Inc. on Form S-3D (File No. 333-60245), Forms S-8 (File No. 333-29941, File No.
333-59475 and File No. 333-60249), and the Registration Statement (Post 
effective amendment #1 on Form S-8 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4, 
File No. 333-65025) pertaining to the Fredrica Bank and Trust Directors Stock 
Option Plan.



                                                    /s/ PORTER KEADLE MOORE, LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 24, 1999
# EPA-SwRI Update • Testing Plan for Alternative Approach at SwRI – Cummins ISB 300hp rating (24 points) – Cummins ISB 200hp rating (24 points) – Navistar N13455hp rating (27 points) – N13 engine with 365hp rating (27 points) – Ford 6.8 liter gasoline engine (optional– depending on funding) 1 DRAFT & DELIBERATIVE

# ISB Engine Platform



# 24 points Mapping Points

DRAFT & DELIBERATIVE 2

# Six Additional Test Points DRAFT & DELIBERATIVE 3

# Mapping Points for ARB Cycle DRAFT & DELIBERATIVE 4

# Interpolation/Extrapolation (ARB) DRAFT & DELIBERATIVE 5

# Regression Approach • Model 1 – Global Regression as function of N/V and N/V*W 

## • Model 2 – Global Regression as function of N/V, N/V^2, and N/V*W DRAFT & DELIBERATIVE 6

# Regression Approach (ARB) DRAFT & DELIBERATIVE 7

# Mapping Points for 55mph Cycle DRAFT & DELIBERATIVE 8

# Interpolation/Extrapolation (55mph) DRAFT & DELIBERATIVE 9

# Regression Approach (55mph) DRAFT & DELIBERATIVE 10

# Mapping Points for 65mph Cycle DRAFT & DELIBERATIVE 11

# Interpolation/Extrapolation (65mph) DRAFT & DELIBERATIVE 12

# Regression Approach (65mph) DRAFT & DELIBERATIVE 13
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4980 

To allow employees of Federally-qualified health centers to obtain health 

coverage under chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2006 

Mr. BASS (for himself, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. WICKER, Mr. BOEHLERT, 

and Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To allow employees of Federally-qualified health centers to 

obtain health coverage under chapter 89 of title 5, 

United States Code. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR COVERAGE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, an employee of a qualified health center may 

6 enroll in an approved health benefits plan under chapter 

7 89 of title 5, United States Code— 

8 (1) either as an individual or for self and fam9 ily; and 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4980 IH 

1 (2) subject to exclusions similar to those re2 ferred to in section 8901(1)(iv) of such title. 

3 (b) QUALIFIED HEALTH CENTER DEFINED.—For 

4 purposes of this section, the term ‘‘qualified health center’’ 

5 means any entity that— 

6 (1) meets the definition of a Federally-qualified 

7 health center, as set forth in section 1905(l)(2)(B) 

8 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 1396d(l)(2)(B)); and 

10 (2) enters into an appropriate agreement with 

11 the Office of Personnel Management under this sec12 tion. 

13 (c) TRANSFERS TO THE EMPLOYEES HEALTH BENE14 FITS FUND.—A qualified health center shall transfer to 

15 the Employees Health Benefits Fund established under 

16 section 8909 of title 5, United States Code, amounts de17 termined by the Director of the Office of Personnel Man18 agement (after consultation with such center) to be equal 

19 to— 

20 (1) the Government contributions which would 

21 be payable by such center under section 8906 of 

22 such title if such center were an employing agency 

23 (as referred to in such section); and 

24 (2) the individual contributions— 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4980 IH 

1 (A) which would be payable under such 

2 section 8906— 

3 (i) by each employee in or under such 

4 center who is enrolled in an approved 

5 health benefits plan (as referred to in sub6 section (a)); and 

7 (ii) by reason of the enrollment (as re8 ferred to in clause (i)); and 

9 (B) which shall be deducted and withheld 

10 ratably from the pay of each such employee. 

11 (d) REGULATIONS.—The Office of Personnel Man12 agement may prescribe regulations to carry out this sec13 tion. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the periodic report of CelLynx Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Daniel R. Ash, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.




Date:
      May 20, 2009
            
            /s/
      Daniel R.
      AshDaniel
      R. Ash
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.