alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

CHARLES HERMAN, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

 )

)

 v. )

)

BRP, INC., BRP US, INC., TELEFLEX ) C.A. No.: N13C-11-105 CLS

CANADA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, )

TELEFLEX CANADA, INC., )

KONGSBERG, INC. (F/K/A TELEFLEX )

MEGATECH, INC.), and )

KONGSBERG AUTOMOTIVE )

HOLDING ASA, )

)

Defendants. ) 

ORDER

Kevin J. Connors, Esquire, 1007 North Orange Street, Suite 600, Wilmington, 

Delaware, 19899. Attorney for Defendants Kongsberg, Inc. 

Timothy E. Lengkeek, Esquire, 1000 North King Street, Wilmington, Delaware, 

19801. Attorney for Plaintiff.

Scott, J.
2

On this 24th day of March and upon Defendant Kongsberg, Inc.’s Motion to 

Dismiss, the Court finds:

Plaintiff Charles Herman (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint against six separate 

defendants alleging causes of action based upon products liability and negligence, 

and a claim for punitive damages based upon an allegation of gross negligence.

Defendant Kongsberg, Inc. (“Kongsberg”) has moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s First 

Amended Complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Del. Super. Ct. R. 

12(b)(2) and based on Delaware’s long-arm statute, 10 Del. C. § 3104. 

On October 13, 2014, the Court sent a letter notifying Plaintiff’s counsel that 

the Court was in receipt of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First 

Amended Complaint to Plaintiff’s counsel, and set the deadline for filing 

Plaintiff’s response by November 14, 2014. The letter also stated, “[f]ailure to file 

a response by this date will be deemed a lack of opposition to the motion.” To this 

date, Plaintiff has not filed a response to Defendant Kongsberg’s motion. 

Therefore, the Court treats Defendant Kongsberg’s motion as unopposed by 

Plaintiff and the Court will not address the merits of the motion. Accordingly, 

Defendant Kongsberg’s Motion to Dismiss is summarily GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/Calvin L. Scott 

Judge Calvin L. Scott, Jr.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 38 (Friday, February 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 8962]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4253]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; Final 
Effect of Designation of a Class of Employees for Addition to the 
Special Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice 
concerning the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a class of 
employees at the Metallurgical Laboratory in Chicago, Illinois, as an 
addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy 
Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On 
January 16, 2009, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384q(b), the 
Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an 
addition to the SEC:

    All AWE employees who worked at the Metallurgical Laboratory in 
Chicago, Illinois, from August 13, 1942 through June 30, 1946, for a 
number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring 
either solely under this employment or in combination with work days 
within the parameters established for one or more other classes of 
employees in the SEC.

    This designation became effective on February 15, 2009, as provided 
for under 42 U.S.C. 7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on February 15, 
2009, members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this 
notice, became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Elliott, Director, Office of 
Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, 
OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). 
Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#76191517053615121558111900"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="335c505240735057501d545c45">[email protected]</span></a>.

Christine M. Branche,
Acting Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. E9-4253 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 09-8829.

#### Gregory L. Donald, Petitioner v. Todd Schultz, et al.

559 U.S. 1040, 130 S. Ct. 2068,

176 L. Ed. 2d 420,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2809.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
No. 09-7729.

#### Laurie Marie Laskey, Petitioner v. AT&T.

559 U.S. 1033, 130 S. Ct. 1945,

176 L. Ed. 2d 409,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2496.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 559 U.S. 909, 130 S. Ct. 1292, 175 L. Ed. 2d 1083, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 867.
No. 09-8389.

#### Delfino Sabedra, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

559 U.S. 994, 130 S. Ct. 1743,

176 L. Ed. 2d 217,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2288,

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 09-7796.

#### Frederick W. Smith, Jr., Petitioner v. Delaware, et al.

559 U.S. 942, 130 S. Ct. 1508,

176 L. Ed. 2d 120,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1154.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Delaware denied.

Same case below, 981 A.2d 1173.
# C_2018298EN.01034501.xml

| 23.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/345 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/345

---

P8_TA(2017)0137

Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors

European Parliament decision of 27 April 2017 on the nomination of Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C8-0110/2017 — 2017/0802(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2018/C 298/49)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0110/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0110/2017),

| — | having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0166/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0166/2017),

| A. | whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

| B. | whereas at its meeting of 12 April 2017 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

B.

whereas at its meeting of 12 April 2017 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors;

| 1. | Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz as a Member of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
No. 09-8107.

#### Micah Austin Patterson, Petitioner v. California.

559 U.S. 950, 130 S. Ct. 1532,

176 L. Ed. 2d 131,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1165.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, denied.
#### Robert E. Lee GRESHAM, Sr., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 7562.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

April 6, 1964.

Merrick S. Wing, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Lawrence A. McSoud, Asst. U. S. Atty. (John M. Imel, U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BREITENSTEIN, HILL and SETH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was indicted, found guilty by a jury, and sentenced for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2115. In his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 he asserts deprivation of constitutional rights because of the insufficiency of the indictment. An examination of the indictment establishes that it satisfies the principles summarized in Clay v. United *780States, 10 Cir., 326 F.2d 196, 198. The motion raised only a question of law and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to appoint counsel or grant a hearing.

Affirmed.
No. 09-834.

#### Kevin Kasten, Petitioner v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation.

559 U.S. 1004, 130 S. Ct. 1890,

176 L. Ed. 2d 361,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2654.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit granted.

Same case below, 570 F.3d 834.
No. 11-713.

#### Rick Perry, Governor of Texas, et al., Appellants v. Shannon Perez, et al. Rick Perry, Governor of Texas, et al., Appellants v. Wendy Davis, et al. Rick Perry, Governor of Texas, et al., Appellants v. Shannon Perez, et al.

No. 11-714.

No. 11-715.

565 U.S. 1103, 132 S. Ct. 993,

181 L. Ed. 2d 570,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 9025.

December 30, 2011.

Motion of the Solicitor General for enlargement of time for oral argument, for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, and for divided argument granted. The time is to be divided as follows: 30 minutes for appellants, 30 minutes for appellees, and 10 minutes for the Solicitor General as am-icus curiae. Motion of appellees Wendy Davis, et al. for divided argument denied.
No. 09-7858.

#### Coleen L. Powers, Petitioner v. Mesaba Aviation, Inc., dba Mesaba Airlines, et al.

559 U.S. 944, 130 S. Ct. 1512,

176 L. Ed. 2d 122,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1481,

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 328 Fed. Appx. 344.
No. 09-8293.

#### Ramon Jay Rogers, Petitioner v. California.

559 U.S. 979, 130 S. Ct. 1704,

176 L. Ed. 2d 193,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2072.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.

Same case below, 46 Cal. 4th 1136, 95 Cal. Rptr. 3d 652, 209 P.3d 977.
No. 11-6351.

#### James Kane, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1160, 132 S. Ct. 1092,

181 L. Ed. 2d 983,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 823.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 434 Fed. Appx. 175.
No. 11-451.

#### Connecticut, Petitioner v. Patrick J. Lenarz.

565 U.S. 1156, 132 S. Ct. 1095,

181 L. Ed. 2d 977,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 723.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Connecticut denied.

*978Same case below, 301 Conn. 417, 22 A.3d 536.
No. 09-735.

#### Jon D. Alexander, Petitioner v. Charles E. Smith, Jr., et al.

559 U.S. 971, 130 S. Ct. 1691,

176 L. Ed. 2d 181,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2007,

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
No. 09-8823.

#### Michael McNeill, Petitioner v. Officer 1st Mr. Germany, et al.

559 U.S. 1040, 130 S. Ct. 2068,

176 L. Ed. 2d 419,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2804.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

*420Same case below, 334 Fed. Appx. 549.
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4912 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2006 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend section 242 of the National Housing Act to extend 

the exemption for critical access hospitals under the 

FHA program for mortgage insurance for hospitals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

HR 4912 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Health Care 

3 Capital Access Act of 2006’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION. 

5 Paragraph (1) of section 242(i) of the National 

6 Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715z–7(i)(1)) is amended by 

7 striking ‘‘July 31, 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘July 31, 2011’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 9, 2006. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4774 

To amend the Clean Air Act to require that, after the year 2012, all gasoline 

sold to consumers in the United States for motor vehicles contain not 

less than 10 percent renewable fuel and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2006 

Mr. UPTON (for himself, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. GILLMOR, Mr. 

SCHWARZ of Michigan, Mr. LEACH, Mr. BASS, Mr. EHLERS, Mr. COBLE, 

Mr. GILCHREST, and Mr. KILDEE) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Clean Air Act to require that, after the year 

2012, all gasoline sold to consumers in the United States 

for motor vehicles contain not less than 10 percent renewable fuel and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 10 PERCENT RENEWABLE FUEL REQUIREMENT. 

4 Section 211 (o) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 7545(o)) is amended by adding the following new para6 graph at the end thereof: 


wwhite on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4774 IH 

1 ‘‘(13) 10 PERCENT RETAIL RENEWABLE FUEL

2 REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 1 year after the en3 actment of this paragraph, the Administrator shall 

4 promulgate regulations under this section requiring 

5 that, after December 31, 2012, all gasoline motor 

6 vehicle fuel sold or dispensed to consumers in the 

7 contiguous United States, on an annual average 

8 basis, contain not less than 10 percent renewable 

9 fuel (as defined in paragraph (1) of this sub10 section).’’. 

Æ 


wwhite on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
No. 10-9599.

#### Martin Chavez-Jimenez, Petitioner v. Jeff Premo, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary.

565 U.S. 1177, 132 S. Ct. 1141,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1016,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1028.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 09-8136.

#### Thurman Lee Henderson, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

559 U.S. 975, 130 S. Ct. 1692,

176 L. Ed. 2d 187,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2003,

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

              COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                          (in millions, except ratios)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             Year Ended August 31,
                                                   -----------------------------------------
                                                      2002           2001            2000
                                                   ----------     ----------      ----------
<S>                                                <C>            <C>             <C>
Earnings:
  Income (loss) before income taxes                $ (3,577.5)    $   (157.7)     $    739.5
  Adjustment for minority interest                       (1.0)             -               -
  Plus fixed charges                                    272.4          202.5           100.2
  Plus amortization of capitalized interest               0.6            1.2             1.2
  Less capitalized interest                                 -              -             0.9
                                                   ----------     ----------      ----------
                                                   $ (3,305.5)    $     46.0      $    840.0
                                                   ==========     ==========      ==========
Fixed Charges:
  Interest portion of annual rent expenses         $     28.3     $     26.5      $     27.7
  Interest expense                                      244.1          176.0            71.6
  Capitalized interest                                      -              -             0.9
                                                   ----------     ----------      ----------
                                                   $    272.4     $    202.5      $    100.2
                                                   ==========     ==========      ==========
  Earnings to fixed charges ratio (excess of
  fixed charges over earnings)                       (3,577.9)          0.23 x          8.38 x

</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FLORIDALMA PEREZ-SAMAYOA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-73372

Agency No. A070-193-356

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 20, 2011** 

Before: RYMER, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. 

Floridalma Perez-Samayoa, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her motion to reopen removal

proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

FILED

MAY 04 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-73372

discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894

(9th Cir. 2003), and we deny the petition for review. 

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Perez-Samayoa’s motion

to reopen because the motion was filed more than fifteen years after the IJ’s

February 22, 1994, deportation order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(1), and PerezSamayoa failed to establish that she acted with the due diligence required for

equitable tolling, see Iturribarria, 321 F.3d at 897 (deadline can be equitably tolled

“when a petitioner is prevented from filing because of deception, fraud, or error, as

long as the petitioner acts with due diligence”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Land and Maritime
  About
  DLA Land and Maritime Image Galleries
 DLA Land and Maritime images
 Supply Chain Alliance and Exhibition
 DLA Land and Maritime News
 Hall of Fame Ceremonies
 DSCC Activities
 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame ceremonies
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
 2024 DLA Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition Image Gallery
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
 DLA Land and Maritime news
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  FIRST

        

        

        
        4
        
        5
        
        6
        
        7
        
        8 (current)
        

        


        


        LAST
 DSCC activities
 Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesOther
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
No. 11-396.

#### Lana S. Eddy Luby, Petitioner v. Thomas A. Bedell, Chief Judge, Circuit Court of West Virginia, Harrison County, et al.

565 U.S. 1061, 132 S. Ct. 776,

181 L. Ed. 2d 487,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8527.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denied.

Same case below, 228 W. Va. 252, 719 S.E.2d 722.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Mercari Communications Group, Ltd.. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Robert W. Marsik, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: June
17, 2004 |  | By:/s/  Robert W. Marsik
      Robert W. Marsik, Chief Executive Officer
      Chief Financial Officer
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating,  acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of  this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---