alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
 
 
 I, Ross A. Teune, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
 
 1) I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Golub Capital BDC 3, Inc.;
 
 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 
 Date: December 5, 2019
 
 
 /s/ Ross A. Teune
 Ross A. Teune
 Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3585 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3585

 To provide for a moratorium on oil and gas leasing and exploration on 
 the outer Continental Shelf off the coast of Florida until 2029, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 27, 2019

 Mr. Rutherford (for himself, Mr. Lawson of Florida, Mrs. Murphy, Mr. 
  Soto, Mr. Crist, Ms. Castor of Florida, Mr. Hastings, Ms. Mucarsel-
  Powell, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Yoho, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Mr. Posey, Mr. 
 Bilirakis, Mr. Spano, Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Mast, Mr. Rooney of Florida, 
and Mr. Waltz) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a moratorium on oil and gas leasing and exploration on 
 the outer Continental Shelf off the coast of Florida until 2029, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bolstering Economies, Anglers, 
Coastal Habitats, Ecosystems and Security in Florida Act'' or the 
``BEACHES in Florida Act''.

SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON OIL AND GAS LEASING AND EXPLORATION ON THE OUTER 
              CONTINENTAL SHELF OFF COAST OF FLORIDA.

    (a) Extension of Gulf Coast Moratorium.--Section 104(a) of the Gulf 
of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 (43 U.S.C. 1331 note) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``2022'' and inserting ``2029''; and
            (2) by inserting ``, and may not issue a permit for oil and 
        gas exploration (as such term is defined in section 2 of the 
        Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act) in'' after ``related 
        activity''.
    (b) Establishment of Atlantic Coast Moratorium.--Section 12 of the 
Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1431) is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(g) Moratorium on Oil and Gas Leasing Off Coast of Florida.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may not offer for oil and 
        gas leasing, preleasing, or any related activity, and may not 
        issue a permit for oil and gas exploration in--
                    ``(A) any area in the Straits of Florida Planning 
                Area; and
                    ``(B) any area in the South Atlantic Planning Area 
                that is south of the northernmost lateral seaward 
                administrative boundary of the State of Florida.
            ``(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply during the 
        period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and 
        ending on June 30, 2029.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 10-11097.

#### Randall Wayne Mays, Petitioner v. Texas.

565 U.S. 963, 132 S. Ct. 453,

181 L. Ed. 2d 294,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7483.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
No. 09-8123.

#### James Phillips, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 950, 130 S. Ct. 1533,

176 L. Ed. 2d 131,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1327.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
No. 09M78.

#### Winford Kent Bishop, Petitioner v. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department.

559 U.S. 1003, 130 S. Ct. 1933,

176 L. Ed. 2d 359,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2562.

March 22, 2010.

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with the declaration of indigency under seal denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IPC Acquisition Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Lance Boxer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | By:  /s/ Lance Boxer   
| |  | Lance Boxer            
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  | August 14, 2003
ERROR: undefined

OFFENDING COMMAND: eexec

STACK:

/quit

-dictionary- 

-mark-
June 12, 2015 

Mr. Michael Martino 

114 Fordham Road 

Valatie, NY 12184 

Dear Mr. Martino: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your June 1, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

2034), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
No. 09-7935.

#### Charlton Jennings, Petitioner v. Gerald I. Rozum, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Somerset, et al.

559 U.S. 946, 130 S. Ct. 1518,

176 L. Ed. 2d 125,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1342.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002

 

The certifications set forth below are herebysubmitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to, and solely forthe purpose of complying with, Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of theUnited States Code in connection with the filing on the date hereof with theSecurities and Exchange Commission of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MAIRHoldings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) for the fiscal year endedMarch 31, 2005 (the “Report”).

 

Each of the undersigned, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, hereby certifiesthat, as of the end of the period covered by the Report:

 

1.               Such Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ PAUL F. FOLEY                                      |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                   |
| Paul F. Foley                                          |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer                 |
| June 14, 2005                                          |
|                                                   |
|                                                   |
| /s/ ROBERT E. WEIL                                     |   |   |
|                                                   |
| Robert E. Weil                                         |
| Vice President, Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| June 14, 2005                                          |
|                                                   |

 

----
# C_2016127EN.01000401.xml

| 9.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/4

---

Communication from the Commission on State aid for films and other audiovisual works: Acceptance of the proposed appropriate measures pursuant to Article 108(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union by all Member States

(2016/C 127/03)

In paragraph 55 of the Communication from the Commission on State aid for films and other audiovisual works (1), the Commission proposed to Member States to accept as appropriate measures for the purposes of Article 108(1) TFEU that they bring their existing schemes regarding film funding in line with this Communication within 2 years of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. Member States were requested to confirm their acceptance of the proposed appropriate measures within 1 month of that publication.

1

Official Journal of the European Union

Pursuant to Article 23(1) of Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 TFEU (2), the Commission recorded the unconditional and explicit agreement to the appropriate measures by all Member States.

2

---

(1)  OJ C 332, 15.11.2013, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, p. 9.

2

---
No. 09-7950.

#### Jesse Leon Christian, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1071, 130 S. Ct. 2092,

176 L. Ed. 2d 728,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3352.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

*729Same case below, 344 Fed. Appx. 53.
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

 ************************* 

 MONOGRAPH No. BO26 

 ************************* 

ITEM: Catsup, Tomato, Grade A, 20 oz. Plastic Bottle 

NSN: 8950-01-396-3998, SPECIFICATION: U.S. STD for Grade 

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 28 

COMPONENT CLASSIFICATION: Ancillary 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM: 

APPEARANCE: Homogeneous, brick red color. 

ODOR: Tomato, mild spice, vinegar-like. 

FLAVOR: Tart, tomato, slight vinegar, mild spice. 

TEXTURE: Smooth, puree, slight viscous. 

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 70 DEGREES F: 12 months 

80 DEGREES F: 9 months 

90 DEGREES F: 6 months 

100 DEGREES F: 3 months 

EXPECTED DETERIORATIVE CHANGES: 

APPEARANCE: Darkening. 

ODOR: Sour. 

FLAVOR: Sour/to burnt/to bitter. 

TEXTURE: Excessively thick and pasty. 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: Product should be tasted by itself 

initially and in small quantities only. Subsequent evaluation should be done when used on 

the entrée that it was packed with. Due to the spicy nature of the product, it should be the 

last component organoleptically evaluated to prevent carryover to other samples and 

consequent masking of their odor and flavor. 

SPECIAL NOTES: Product is packaged in a 20 ounce plastic bottle.
#### J. M. Markley, Hugh Anderson, R. B. Leonard and J. V. Riley, Co-partners, Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Miami Block Company, *Plaintiffs in Error,*v. I. E. Schilling Company, a Corporation Organized and Existing Under the Laws of the State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

On Petition for Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

— The action against the defendants below was not as stockholders of a corporation who under the statute were liable as partners because a requirement of the law was not complied with, and the defendants did not by plea aver their status as being that of stockholders. There was consequently no occasion for the court to discuss whether there was a dissolution of a corporation. The evidence referred to the corporation and that was adverted to only so far as it showed the existence, continuance and termination of a relation in the nature of a partnership among the defendants who were sued as copartners and not as stockholders with a statutory partnership liability.

Rehearing denied.

Whitpield, P. J., and Terrell and Bupord, J. J. concur.

Brown, C. J., and Ellis, J., concur in the opinion.
No. 09-6673.

#### Ronnie Lee Bowling, Petitioner v. Kentucky.

559 U.S. 1032, 130 S. Ct. 1943,

176 L. Ed. 2d 406,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2420.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

*407Former decision, 558 U.S. 1117, 130 S. Ct. 1053, 175 L. Ed. 2d 893, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 205.
No. 09-9238.

#### Johnny William Lane, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1043, 130 S. Ct. 2077,

176 L. Ed. 2d 425,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2921.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 591 F.3d 921.
October 17, 2012

Mr. Dennis Darrah 1201 Columbia Road, Suite 101 Plainfield, IN 46168

Dear Mr. Darrah:

This letter is in response to your August 7, 2012, petition for rulemaking to amend § 65.93 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) that would combine eligibility requirements to be used for inspection authorization (IA) renewals.

In general, we use the following criteria to determine which petitions for rulemaking are of sufficient priority to initiate a rulemaking action:

1) the immediacy of the safety concerns the petition raises; 2) the priority of other Federal Aviation Administration rulemaking issues; and 3) the resources we have available to address these issues.

The FAA issued denials of petitions for exemption and rulemaking in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition for rulemaking.

The FAA has given careful consideration to your petition; however, we disagree with the proposed revision. Section 65.93, by rule, currently affords sufficient flexibility for IA renewals based on several different activity leve ls, training and or oral testing without the necessity of combining annuals, major repairs and or major alteration as proposed in your petition. Further and most importantly, there is no gained safety benefit in allowing combinations of the activities within § 65.93(a)(1), (2) or (3) as proposed to be considered for IA renewal purposes. The FAA’s limited resources can be better served when directed to specific areas of safety concerns and IA renewals do not rise to this level of safety concern.

Therefore we find that your petition does not addr ess an immediate safety concern to warrant

further resources at this time.2

In consideration of the foregoing and pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. §§ 40113 and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, your petition for rulemaking is hereby denied.

Accordingly, we will close Docket No. FAA-2012-0840.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Deputy Director, Flight Standards

Service
Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

GREAT FALLS PUBLIC LIBRARY,

Defendant and Appellee.

ORDER

On May 19, 2021, this Court granted self-represented Appellant Jada Ku's Motion

for Extension of Time and ordered that she prepare, file, and serve her opening brief on or

before June 14, 2021. In the prior Order, we also denied Ku's Motion for Appointrnent of

Counsel because she was not entitled to counsel in her civil case alleging discrimination.

This Court also noted opposing counsel's objection to any delay in this appeal as well as

that Ku has prosecuted cases in the District Court and had an appeal previously with this

Court. Ku's requests stem from this Court rejecting her original opening brief. On May

21, 2021, Ku filed another Motion for Extension of Tirne as well as a "Motion for

Interpreter/Advocator/Attorney."

It appears that Ku did not receive this Court's prior Order in the mail until after she

inade these second requests. We point out that Ku represented herself in her underlying

District Court cases as well as with the motions she has filed in this Court and has not

demonstrated any need for an interpreter. Ku communicates well in English. This Court

reiterates that it has no statutory authority to appoint counsel for Ku or to appoint an

advocate in her pending appeal. Having addressed her motions earlier, therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Ku's Motion for Extension of Time is DENIED, as moot; and

2. Ku's "Motion for Interpreter/Advocator/Attorney" is DENIED.
Chief Justice

2
# C_2016480EN.01000301.xml

| 22.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 480/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 480/3

---

Information from the Commission pursuant to Council Decision (EU) 2016/1795

(2016/C 480/04)

Pursuant to Article 3 of Council Decision (EU) 2016/1795 of 29 September 2016 establishing the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union with regard to the amendments to the Annexes to the European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR) and to the Annexed Regulations to the European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Inland Waterways (ADN) (1), the Commission informs that the accepted amendments are available at: http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/adr/adr2015_amend.html and https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/danger/publi/adr/depnoti/CN-744-2016e.pdf for ADR, as well as at http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/adn/adn2015_amend.html and https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2016/dgwp15ac2/Legal_office/CN.743.2016-Eng.pdf for ADN. They will enter into force on 1 January 2017.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 274, 11.10.2016, p. 52.

1

---
# C_2017383EN.01000201.xml

| 14.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/2

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.8444 — ArcelorMittal/Ilva)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 383/03)

On 8 November 2017, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the abovementioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

1

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference No M.8444 — ArcelorMittal/Ilva, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---