alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2



Certification
of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I,
Benjamin A. Contrucci, Chief Financial Officer of SSB Bancorp, Inc., (the “Company”), hereby certify in my capacity
as an officer of the Company that I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2018 (the “Amended
Report”) and that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The
    Amended Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The
    information contained in the Amended Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
    of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: May 21, 2019 | /s/
    Benjamin A. Contrucci
|------------------ | -----------------------------
|                   | Benjamin A. Contrucci        
|                   | Chief Financial Officer      





The
purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SSB Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained
by SSB Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 09-8507.

#### Byron Floyd, Petitioner v. Florida.

559 U.S. 1011, 130 S. Ct. 1888,

176 L. Ed. 2d 372,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2741,

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Corey
Henry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-3 (the
Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on
my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and
their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I
have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wilmington Trust, National Association.



By:

/s/ Corey HenryName:

Corey HenryTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerSantander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date:

March 30, 2018
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Falcon Natural Gas Corp. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Massimiliano  Pozzoni,  Principal  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respect,  the financial  condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                        /s/     Massimiliano Pozzoni
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Name:   Massimiliano Pozzoni
                                        Title:  Principal Financial Officer
                                        Date:   August 15, 2005



                                       1
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4888 

To amend the provision regarding the emergency watershed protection program in the Department of Defense, Emergency Supplemental Appropriations to Address Hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico, and Pandemic Influenza Act, 2006, to restore the discretion of the Secretary of Agriculture 

to waive or reduce the non-Federal cost share requirements of the program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2006 

Mr. BOUSTANY (for himself, Mr. BAKER, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. MELANCON, 

and Mr. JINDAL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the provision regarding the emergency watershed 

protection program in the Department of Defense, Emergency Supplemental Appropriations to Address Hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico, and Pandemic Influenza 

Act, 2006, to restore the discretion of the Secretary 

of Agriculture to waive or reduce the non-Federal cost 

share requirements of the program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4888 IH 

1 SECTION 1. CONSISTENT COST-SHARING REQUIREMENTS 

2 UNDER EMERGENCY WATERSHED PROTEC3 TION PROGRAM. 

4 Section 102 of title I of division B of Public Law 

5 109–148 (119 Stat. 2748) is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as 

7 subsections (d) and (e), respectively; and 

8 (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the fol9 lowing new subsection (c): 

10 ‘‘(c) WAIVER OR REDUCTION OF COST-SHARE RE11 QUIREMENT.—The Secretary of Agriculture may waive or 

12 reduce the non-Federal cost share requirement imposed by 

13 subsection (b) in cases in which the Secretary determines 

14 that immediate action is or was required for environmental 

15 or safety concerns and the local partner cannot or could 

16 not financially participate.’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Unaudited Balance Sheet and Statement of Income for the period ended June
30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      1,791,144
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   8,478
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1,822,307
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,822,307
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          75,217
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                  1,747,090
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,822,307
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               50,686
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 197,665
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (146,979)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (146,979)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                (146,979)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.016)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.016)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-70468 and 333-146223 on
Forms S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-140018 on Form S-3 of our reports dated December 9, 2008, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to
the Company's adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, effective
October 1, 2007), and the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A of Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended September 30, 2008.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
December 18, 2008

---



QuickLinks
No. 09-7576.

#### David W. Svete, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1009, 130 S. Ct. 1881,

176 L. Ed. 2d 369,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2660.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 565 F.3d 1363.
No. 09-9495.

#### Christine Owad, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1058, 130 S. Ct. 2362,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3009.

176 L. Ed. 2d 578,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice So-tomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 363 Fed. Appx. 789.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Falcon Natural Gas Corp. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Fred B.
Zaziski,  Principal  Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that;

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                        /s/     Fred B. Zaziski
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Name:   Fred B. Zaziski
                                        Title:  Principal Executive Officer
                                        Date:   August 15, 2005



                                       1
No. 09-8738.

#### Daniel Prewett, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 985, 130 S. Ct. 1720,

176 L. Ed. 2d 201,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1942.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

*202Same case below, 340 Fed. Appx. 639.
No. 09A389 (09-8568).

#### Pocahontas Cooley, Applicant v. Paul J. Kelly, et ux.

559 U.S. 968, 130 S. Ct. 1729,

176 L. Ed. 2d 177,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2030.

March 1, 2010.

Application for stay, addressed to Justice Thomas and referred to the Court, denied.
No. 11-7825.

#### Kevin Mack, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1171, 132 S. Ct. 1125,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1003,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 660.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 24 A.3d 664.
# C_2016463EN.01000201.xml

| 13.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 463/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 463/2

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/2231 and Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2016/2230 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo

(2016/C 463/03)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in Annex II to Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP (1) and in Annex Ia to Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 (2) concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

1

2

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the above-mentioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2010/788/CFSP and in Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The grounds for designations of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the web-sites in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 3 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council before 1 October 2017, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's next review, pursuant to Article 9 of Decision 2010/788/CFSP.

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 336, 21.12.2010, p. 30.

1

(2)  OJ L 193, 23.7.2005, p. 1.

2

---
##### 



EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 Novellus Systems, Dr. Thomas
Caulfbeld,
 I. POSITION AND RESPONSIBILITIES
 Position.
 Other Activities.
 No Conflict.
 II. COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS
 Base Salary.




---



##### 



Expenses.
 III. AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT; TERMINATION BY COMPANY
 At-Will Termination by Company.
 Severance.
 IV. OTHER TERMINATIONS BY COMPANY
 Termination for Cause.




---



##### 



By Death.
 By Disability.
 V. TERMINATION BY EXECUTIVE




---



##### 



VI. TERMINATION OBLIGATIONS
 Return of Property.
 Resignation, Cooperation and Indemnity.
 VII. INVENTIONS AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION; PROHIBITION ON THIRD PARTY INFORMATION
 Proprietary Information Agreement.
 Non-Solicitation.




---



##### 



Stock Options.
 Restricted Stock. provided, however,
 Bonus Plan. provided, however,
 Signing Bonus.
 Benefits.




---



##### 



Non-Disclosure of Third Party Information.
 VIII. ARBITRATION
  IX. AMENDMENTS; WAIVERS; REMEDIES
  X. ASSIGNMENT; BINDING EFFECT
 Assignment.




---



##### 



Binding Effect.
 XI. NOTICES
   
  
 XII. SEVERABILITY




---



##### 



XIII. TAXES
  XIV. GOVERNING LAW
  XV. INTERPRETATION
  XVI. OBLIGATIONS SURVIVE TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT
  XVII. COUNTERPARTS
  XVIII. AUTHORITY




---



##### 



XIX. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
  XX. EXECUTIVE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 EXECUTIVE ACKNOWLEDGES EXECUTIVE HAS HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO CONSULT LEGAL COUNSEL CONCERNING
THIS AGREEMENT, THAT EXECUTIVE HAS READ AND UNDERSTANDS THE AGREEMENT, THAT EXECUTIVE IS FULLY
AWARE OF ITS LEGAL EFFECT, AND THAT EXECUTIVE HAS ENTERED INTO IT FREELY BASED ON EXECUTIVES OWN
JUDGMENT AND NOT ON ANY REPRESENTATIONS OR PROMISES OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED IN THIS AGREEMENT.
 In Witness Whereof,
 Novellus Systems, Inc.:
    
    Executive:By:
    
    /s/ Richard S. Hill

Richard S. Hill
Chief Executive Officer
    
    /s/ Dr. Thomas Caulfield

Dr. Thomas Caulfield
No. 09-7863.

#### James Anthony Warren, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

559 U.S. 944, 130 S. Ct. 1513,

176 L. Ed. 2d 122,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1228.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 09-8660.

#### Quinton Wheeler, Petitioner v. Harley G. Lappin, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.

559 U.S. 983, 130 S. Ct. 1716,

176 L. Ed. 2d 199,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1996,

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 333 Fed. Appx. 746.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4599]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6512]


Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation; Notice 
of Charter Renewal

    The Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation is 
renewing its charter for a period of two years. This Advisory Committee 
will continue to make recommendations to the Historian and the 
Department of State on all aspects of the Department's program to 
publish the Foreign Relations of the United States series as well as on 
the Department's responsibility under statute (22 U.S.C. 4351, et seq.) 
to open its 30-year old and older records for public review at the 
National Archives and Records Administration. The Committee consists of 
nine members drawn from among historians, political scientists, 
archivists, international lawyers, and other social scientists who are 
distinguished in the field of U.S. foreign relations.
    Questions concerning the Committee and the renewal of its Charter 
should be directed to Marc J. Susser, Executive Secretary, Advisory 
Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation, Department of State, 
Office of the Historian, Washington, DC, 20520, telephone (202) 663-
1123 (e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f59d9c86819a878cb58681948190db929a83"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c4acadb7b0abb6bd84b7b0a5b0a1eaa3abb2">[email protected]</span></a>).

    Dated: February 6, 2009.
Marc Susser,
Executive Secretary, Department of State.
 [FR Doc. E9-4599 Filed 3-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE02089A4

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID J. DEJEU,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT

OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 13-36109

D.C. No. 3:13-cv-05401-RBL

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 18, 2015** 

Before: TASHIMA, OWENS, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges. 

David J. Dejeu appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his

motion to set aside the judgment dismissing his action alleging claims related to

Washington state’s registration requirements for contractors. We have jurisdiction

FILED

DEC 02 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the district court’s

denial of a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from judgment. Harman v.

Harper, 7 F.3d 1455, 1458 (9th Cir. 1993). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Dejeu’s Rule 60(b)

motion because Dejeu failed to demonstrate any basis for relief. See Sch. Dist. No.

1J, Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993)

(setting forth grounds for relief from judgment).

To the extent that Dejeu attempts to challenge the district court’s underlying

judgment of dismissal, we lack jurisdiction because Dejeu did not timely file a

notice of appeal as to the underlying judgment, or a post-judgment motion that

tolled the time to file a notice of appeal as to the judgment. See Fed. R. App. P.

4(a)(1)(A) (notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after entry of judgment);

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(A) (time for filing a notice of appeal may be extended

where party timely files an enumerated tolling motion); Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S.

205, 214 (2007) (“[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a

jurisdictional requirement.”).

AFFIRMED.

2 13-36109