alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|           |   |              |                                       |                    |   |
|----------------|--------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|           |   | LAXAI PHARMA LTD. |                                       |
|           |   |              |                                       |                    |
| April 15, 2010 |   | By:               | /s/    J. Ram Ajjarapu |                    |
|           |   |              |                                       | J. Ram Ajjarapu         |   |
|           |   |              |                                       | Chief Executive Officer |   |

----

----
No. 09-6998.

#### Jesus Machado, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

559 U.S. 964, 130 S. Ct. 1573,

176 L. Ed. 2d 156,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1041.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1096, 130 S. Ct. 1023, 175 L. Ed. 2d 626, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 9017.
No. 11-7846.

#### Toney Sabater, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1171, 132 S. Ct. 1127,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1005,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 613.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 441 Fed. Appx. 68.
No. 09-7426.

#### Bryan Davis, Sr., Petitioner v. California Western School of Law, et al.

559 U.S. 988, 130 S. Ct. 1733,

176 L. Ed. 2d 208,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1987.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1125, 130 S. Ct. 1084, 175 L. Ed. 2d 907, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 367.
No. 09-7938.

#### Corey L. Manning, Petitioner v. Carmen Palmer, Warden.

559 U.S. 946, 130 S. Ct. 1518,

176 L. Ed. 2d 125,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1098,

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 09-8454.

#### Edmond David Belcher, Petitioner v. Florida.

559 U.S. 1010, 130 S. Ct. 1886,

176 L. Ed. 2d 371,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2647.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.

Same case below, 9 So. 3d 665.
No. 09-8100.

#### Ra’Zulu Ukawabutu, Petitioner v. Michelle R. Ricci, Associate Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al.

559 U.S. 950, 130 S. Ct. 1532,

176 L. Ed. 2d 131,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1471.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
No. 11-7282.

#### Duvallon C. Parker, Petitioner v. Tim Lally Chevrolet.

565 U.S. 1162, 132 S. Ct. 1102,

181 L. Ed. 2d 987,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 900,

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
f?~ 

:'J 3"5728 

!'" 

;'...; 

ACETO 

Aceto Carporatton 

4 Tn Harbor Court 


Port Washington, NY 11050 


Tel: (516) 627 6000 


Fax: (516) 627 6093 


www.acc:to.com 


December 16, 2C)I 1 

Document Control Office (7407) 


Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 


U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Room G-099 


1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW 


Washington, DC 20460 


ATTN: TSCA Section 4 (Docket Identification Number OPPT-2009-0112) 

Re: Application for Exemption (on the basis of market exit), Section 4 Test Rule, Benzene 

Sulfonyl Chloride, CAS# 98-09-9, Testing of Certain Product Volume Chemicals, Third Group 

ofChemicals, Federal Register, Vol. 76, No. 65404, October 21,2011,40 CFR 799.5089 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Aceto Corporation submits this application for exemption from the requirements for testing BenzeDe 

SulloDyl Chloride, CAS# 98-09-9 under TSCA Section 4 Test Rule Testing ofCertain High Product 

Volume Chemicals. As noted above, Aceto will be exiting the market by no longer importing Benzene 

Sulfonyl Chloride, CAS#'! 98-09-9 into the United States. 

Aceto acknowledges that if we do re-enter to the market at a later date, we understand that we must 

comply with 40 CFR 790.99 and will be financially responsible to those who have committed to testing. 

As per 40 CFR 790.99, ACETO Corporation provides our Statement of financial responsibility per our 

application for exemption: 

I (ACETO Corporation) understand that ifthis application is granted before the reimbursement 

period described in section 4(c){3)(B) ofTSCA expires, ACETO Corporation must pay fair and 

equitable reimbursement to the person or persons who incurred or shared in the costs of 

complying with the reqUirement to submit data and upon whose data the granting ofmy 

application was based 

If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me. 

/'--, Sincerely, 

.....~~' , J--~ ( " 

/ \;1 :, ,}.£._. _____,-.l;,-..k,\­ 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 

40120000071 

I ~" (\ ~ '~ancis~ 

Regulatory Affairs Specialist - Environmental, Health, Safety and Regulatory Affairs 


ACETO Corporation 


CONTAINS NO CBI
No. 09-966.

#### Dom Wadhwa, Petitioner v. Department of Veterans Affairs (two judgments).

559 U.S. 1037, 130 S. Ct. 2084,

176 L. Ed. 2d 415,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2785.

March 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 353 Fed. Appx. 435 (first judgment) and 353 Fed. Appx. 434 (second judgment).
No. 09-9349.

#### Shane Watkins, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1054, 130 S. Ct. 2356,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3032.

176 L. Ed. 2d 571,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4855 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4855

    To amend the District of Columbia College Access Act of 1999 to 
   reauthorize for 5 additional years the public and private school 
         tuition assistance programs established under the Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 2006

 Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia (for himself and Ms. Norton) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the District of Columbia College Access Act of 1999 to 
   reauthorize for 5 additional years the public and private school 
         tuition assistance programs established under the Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 5-YEAR REAUTHORIZATION OF TUITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS.

    (a) Public School Program.--Section 3(i) of the District of 
Columbia College Access Act of 1999 (sec. 38-2702(i), D.C. Official 
Code) is amended by striking ``each of the 7 succeeding fiscal years'' 
and inserting ``each of the 12 succeeding fiscal years''.
    (b) Private School Program.--Section 5(f) of such Act (sec. 38-
2704(f), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking ``each of the 7 
succeeding fiscal years'' and inserting ``each of the 12 succeeding 
fiscal years''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2017356EN.01000201.xml

| 21.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 356/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 356/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8453 — Nestlé/BPW)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 356/03)

On 13 October 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8453. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8453. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1



                                  CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, the undersigned  officer of ING USA Annuity
and Life  Insurance  Company  (the  "Company")  hereby  certifies  that,  to the
officer's knowledge, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d), as applicable,  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



March 17, 2005                       By:    /s/  David A. Wheat
--------------                              ------------------------------------
     (Date)                                      David A. Wheat
                                                 Director, Senior Vice President
                                                    and Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-7439.

#### Donald Griggs, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1059, 130 S. Ct. 2368,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3023.

176 L. Ed. 2d 578,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1084, 130 S. Ct. 817, 175 L. Ed. 2d 573, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 8834.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Standard Companies Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frederic M. Poses, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Frederic M. Poses  
|Frederic M. Poses      
|Chief Executive Officer

February 26, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. §1350

In connection with the quarterly
report of Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William B. Olson,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.

Date: December 18, 2006



/s/ WILLIAM B. OLSONWilliam B. OlsonChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit
32.1



Certification
of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I,
J. Daniel Moon, IV, President and Chief Executive Officer of SSB Bancorp, Inc., (the “Company”), hereby certify in
my capacity as an officer of the Company that I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,
2018 (the “Amended Report”) and that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The
    Amended Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The
    information contained in the Amended Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
    of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|Date: May 21, 2019 | /s/
    J. Daniel Moon, IV           
|------------------ | -------------------------------------
|                   | J. Daniel Moon, IV                   
|                   | President and Chief Executive Officer





The
purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SSB Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained
by SSB Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 09-8650.

#### Ardra Young, Petitioner v. Paul Renico, Warden.

559 U.S. 1014, 130 S. Ct. 1898,

176 L. Ed. 2d 377,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2629.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 346 Fed. Appx. 53.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 10

- 00012

- CV

IN RE SEVEN

- O CORPORATION II

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition f or writ of mandamus is denied.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna , and

Justice D avis

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed January 27, 2010

[ OT06 ]
FOREWARD 

This publication contains illustrations of defects applicable to the 

examination of the exterior condition of filled metal food containers 

under the United States Standards for Condition of Containers. They are 

intended for use as references by inspectors, graders, and others in 

interpreting and applying the Standards. Since the examination of such 

containers under the Standards also includes an examination of the can 

labels, illustrations of labeling defects are included. The tables from 

the Standards which list metal container and labeling defects are shown 

on the next page. 

In a few instances, an illustration shows the upper or lower limit of a 

defect. Otherwise, each illustration is considered to be a “typical” 

representation of the indicated defect. The legend accompanying each 

illustration explains, in general terms, the reason(s) for the 

classification of the defect as critical, major, minor, or 

insignificant. It also identifies each illustration which shows the 

upper or lower limit of a defect.
No. 09-8637.

#### James T. O’Daniel, Petitioner v. Ohio.

559 U.S. 1013, 130 S. Ct. 1898,

176 L. Ed. 2d 377,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2596.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Highland County, denied.
VIA EMAIL 

Bryon Wolff 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C: 20460 

JUL 2 3 2014 

CTO, Polymer Specialties International Ltd. 

175 Deerfield Road, 

Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 2L8 

Dear Mr. Wolff: 

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY 

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION 

This letter serves as a response to your May 20, 2014 request to add the Gas Stop Black TIF 

Barrier Film, 1.1 mil thickness, to the EPA soil fumigant tarp credit website. 

The EPA has reviewed the laboratory tarp testing data for the Gas Stop Black TIF Barrier film 

(MRID 49390201) submitted by Ajwa Laboratory on behalf of EcoPoly Solutions LTD. Based 

on the calculated mass transfer coefficients (MTCs) and the corresponding cut points determined 

by EPA as a basis for assigning buffer zone credits (DP Barcode 385314. Dawson, Smith and 

She lat. "Second Update to Health Effects Division Recommendations for Good Agricultural 

Practices and Associated Buffer Credits. " January 11, 2011), the tarp qualifies for the following 

buffer zone reduction credits: 60% for methyl bromide, 40% for chloropicrin, 40% chloropicrin 

and 1 ,3-dichloropropene, and 20% for metam sodium or metam potassium. This tarp is also 

approved with use of dimethyl disulfide. 

The tarp will be listed on the following EPA websites, http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/tarpcredits/ 

and http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrdl/reregistration/soil fumigants/dmds-tarps/, as "Gas Stop Black 

TIF Barrier Film, 2:1.1 mil." 

Please see the enclosure for the EPA's review of the laboratory studies. Please contact me at 

(703) 308-2961 or at schroeder.carolyn@epa.gov if you have any questions. 

Carolyn Sc reeder 

Chemical Review Manager 

Risk Management & Implementation Branch IV 

Pesticide Re-evaluation Division 

Enclosures: DP Barcode 420375. Health Effects Division. "Classification ofTarp Permeability 

Data Based on ASTM Method E2945-14 for Gas Stop Black TIF Barrier Film By 

Ecopoly Solutions, Inc." July 23, 2014.
EXHIBIT 12.2

            CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Healthcare
Technologies Ltd. on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2005 (the
"Report"), I, Eran Rotem, Chief Financial Officer of Healthcare Technologies
Ltd. certify (pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Healthcare
Technologies Ltd.

                                                    HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.

                                                    By: /s/ Eran Rotem
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Eran Rotem
                                                    Chief Financial Officer

Date:  October 30, 2006
PUBLIC NOTICE 

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 

 Request for Public Comments 

On Exceptional Events in Yuma 

In 2005, Congress identified a need to account for events that result in exceedances of the 

National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) that are exceptional in nature (e.g., 

not expected to reoccur or caused by acts of nature beyond man-made controls.) In 

response, EPA promulgated the Exceptional Events Rule (EER) to address exceptional 

events in 40 CFR Parts 50 and 51 on March 22, 2007 (72 FR 13560). On May 2, 2011, 

EPA released draft guidance documents on the implementation of the EER to State, tribal 

and local air agencies for review. The EER allows for states and tribes to “flag” air 

quality monitoring data as an exceptional event, and therefore exclude these data from 

consideration in air quality planning, if EPA concurs with the demonstration submitted 

by the flagging agency that all procedural and technical requirements have been met. 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 50.14(c)(3)(i), the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 

(ADEQ) is soliciting comments on its final demonstration of an event that has caused 

elevated concentrations of PM10 in Yuma on July 3, 2011 and ADEQ’s decision to flag 

this episode based on this analysis. A copy of the demonstration titled State of Arizona 

Exceptional Event Documentation for the Event of July 3, 2011, for the Yuma County 

PM10 Nonattainment Area can be viewed online beginning Monday, December 3, 2012 

on the ADEQ website at http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/air/plan/index.html by selecting 

Air Quality – Public Notices, Meetings and Hearings. Interested parties can submit 

written comments throughout the comment period which will end at 5:00 p.m. on 

Tuesday, January 1, 2013. Any comments received will be responded to and forwarded to 

EPA with the final demonstration. 

Written comments should be addressed, faxed, or e-mailed to: 

Andra Juniel, Air Assessment Section, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, 

1110 W. Washington Street, 3415-A, Phoenix, AZ 85007, PHONE: (602) 771-4417; 

FAX: (602) 771-2366, E-mail: juniel.andra@azdeq.gov. 

In addition to being available on-line, a copy of the analysis is available for review at the 

following locations: 

 ADEQ Records Management Center, 1110 W. Washington St., Phoenix, AZ, 

 85007, Attn: Records Center, (602) 771-4380, email: recordscenter@azdeq.gov. 

 Yuma County Library, Reference Section, 2951 S. 21st Dr., Yuma, Arizona 

 85364, Attn: Brian Franssen, (928) 782-1871, E-mail: 

bfranssen@yumalibrary.org. 

Persons with a disability may request reasonable accommodations by contacting Linda 

Morrison at (602) 771-4793 or 1-800-234-5677 ext. 771-4793. This document is 

available in alternative formats by contacting ADEQ TDD phone number at (602) 771-

4829.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129421 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129421 

 COA: 253125 

Crawford CC: 02-002015-FC 

KEVIN JAMES ESTEP,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 2, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2005 

Clerk