alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018369EN.01017701.xml

| 11.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/177 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/177

---

P8_TA(2017)0482

EU-USA Air Transport Agreement ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 December 2017 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Air Transport Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United States of America, of the other part (13419/2016 — C8-0100/2017 — 2006/0058(NLE))

(Consent)

(2018/C 369/25)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (13419/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (13419/2016),

| — | having regard to the Air Transport Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United States of America, of the other part (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Air Transport Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United States of America, of the other part (1),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 100(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0100/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 100(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0100/2017),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A8-0376/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A8-0376/2017),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the United States of America. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---

(1)  OJ L 134, 25.5.2007, p. 4.

---
# C_2016058EN.01000301.xml

| 13.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/3

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt

(2016/C 58/04)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP (1), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 (2), concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt.

1

2

The Council is considering a renewal of the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/172/CFSP. The Council holds on its file new elements concerning all persons listed in the Annex to Decision 2011/172/CFSP and in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 270/2011. The persons concerned are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the information that relates to them, before 19 February 2016, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received before 29 February 2016 will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, in accordance with Article 2 of Decision 2011/172/CFSP and Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) No 270/2011.

---

(1)  OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 63.

1

(2)  OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 4.

2

---
**
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT UNDER SECTION 302 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Steve E.Krognes, certify that: 

 
1.I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Denali Therapeutics Inc.; 
 
2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
 
3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
 
4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 
 
(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 
 
(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 
 
(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 
 
5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 
 
(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 
 
(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 
Date: March 19, 2018 

 
  /s/ Steve E. Krognes 
 
  Steve E. Krognes   Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer **
# C_2016276EN.01002301.xml

| 29.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/23

---

Corrigendum to Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 171 of 12 May 2016
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 171 of 12 May 2016

(2016/C 276/04)

On page 4, section ‘Deadline for submission of tenders’:

for:

for:

‘27 June 2016, 10:00 CET’,

read:

read:

‘15 August 2016, 10:00 CET’.

---
No. 11-6121.

#### Rodney Edrice Gunn Ash, Petitioner v. Joseph Nish, et al.

565 U.S. 1102, 132 S. Ct. 872,

181 L. Ed. 2d 569,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8947.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 968, 132 S. Ct. 464, 181 L. Ed. 2d 303, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7553.
Sent : Friday, September 19, 2014 10:07 AM

To : Cymbalsky, John; Kido, Michael

Subject : HVAC Energy efficiency

Ref: docket number EE-2013–BT–STD–0007 RIN 1904-AC95

Gentlemen:

As a supporter and proponent of the D O E efforts to improve energy efficiency, I like to submit

www.thermorisecoil.com for your information.

The DEEP coil has been tested analytically and by empirical tests numerous times and by

independent parties and proven valid and true. Much information is available on the website.

This technology can be readily implemented with minimal costs and time. It will allow manufacturers to

comfortably comply and even exceed the proposed minimum standards.

If I can be of any help, please feel free to contact.

Very truly yours,

Hemant D Kale, PE

Thermorise Inc.
No. 11-5327.

#### Franklin C. Smith, Petitioner v. Brady McWhirter, et al.

565 U.S. 901, 132 S. Ct. 297,

181 L. Ed. 2d 180,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5655.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 415 Fed. Appx. 510.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

PAMELA RUSAS BARBEE

NO. 2022 KW 0035

MARCH 28, 2022

In Re: Pamela Rosas Barbee, applying for supervisory writs, 

22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, 

No. 3454- M- 2020. 

BEFORE: McDONALD, LANIER, AND WOLFE, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

JMM

WIL

EW

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

NAI

DEPUTYLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
No. 09-325.

#### Alexandre Aronov, Petitioner v. Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al.

559 U.S. 964, 130 S. Ct. 1571,

176 L. Ed. 2d 154,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1067.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1147, 130 S. Ct. 1137, 175 L. Ed. 2d 972, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 648.
# C_2018356EN.01014901.xml

| 4.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 356/149 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 356/149

---

P8_TA(2017)0432

Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors — Hannu Takkula

European Parliament decision of 15 November 2017 on the nomination of Hannu Takkula as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C8-0330/2017 — 2017/0814(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2018/C 356/27)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0330/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0330/2017),

| — | having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0338/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0338/2017),

| A. | whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

| B. | whereas at its meeting of 19 October 2017 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

B.

whereas at its meeting of 19 October 2017 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors;

| 1. | Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Hannu Takkula as a Member of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Annual Report of Corporación América Airports S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Martín Francisco Antranik Eurnekian, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(i)  the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|/s/ Martín Francisco Antranik Eurnekian   | 
|----------------------------------------- | 
|Name: Martín Francisco Antranik Eurnekian | 
|Title: Chief Executive Officer            | 
|Date: April 27, 2018                      |
No. 09-8498.

#### Jorge Reyes, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 958, 130 S. Ct. 1556,

176 L. Ed. 2d 144,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1198.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 27, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-2187

Lower Tribunal No. F96-12914

________________

Steven Gamble,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lody Jean, Judge.

Steven Gamble, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kayla Heather McNab, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, HENDON and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
No. 09-606.

#### Javitch, Block & Rathbone, LLP, et al., Petitioners v. Delores Hartman, et al.

559 U.S. 971, 130 S. Ct. 1688,

176 L. Ed. 2d 180,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2166.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 569 F.3d 606.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. §1350

In connection with the amended
quarterly report of Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Alan
P. Niedzwiecki, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and
for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.

Date: June 13, 2006



/s/ ALAN P. NIEDZWIECKIAlan P. Niedzwiecki President and Chief Executive
Officer
No. 09M76.

#### Ernest Miller, Petitioner v. California.

559 U.S. 1002, 130 S. Ct. 1933,

176 L. Ed. 2d 358,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2634.

March 22, 2010.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
No. 09-6864.

#### Kenneth M. Lewis, Petitioner v. Stan Burtt, Warden.

559 U.S. 964, 130 S. Ct. 1573,

176 L. Ed. 2d 156,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1078.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1079, 130 S. Ct. 803, 175 L. Ed. 2d 565, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 8764.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          40,148
<SECURITIES>                                   241,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               281,648
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 281,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3000
<OTHER-SE>                                     288,648
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   281,648
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Pickering 

by the Supreme Court except on petition for review"). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

rig 

Saitta 

Pitt UAP ' J. 

cc: Hon. Robert Lane, District Court Judge 

Hyrum Joseph West 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Nye County District Attorney 

Nye County Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A exo
The Honorable Joe W. Hayes 

County Attorney, Hemphill County 

P. 0. Box 613 

Canadian, Tcxaa 79014 

Dear Mr. Hayea: 

Opinion No. H-32 

Rc: Is the at-large method of 

electing County Comminaionera 

constitutional in light of 

Article 5, Section 18 of the 

Texar Conrtitution? 

You have askedour opinion concerning the election of County 

Commirrionera of Hemphill County. Your letter atater that one 

precinct in the county containr 85 to 90 per cent of the entire 

county population and that, to avoid having to redistrict the county, 

the four commiaaionere are elected “at-large” with each voter in 

the county having one vote for each commissioner to be elected. 

Article 5. $18 of the Constitution of the State of Texas provider, 

in part: 

“Each county ahall in like manner be divided into 

four commissionerr precincts in each of which there 

rhall be elected by the qualified voters thereof one 

County Commissioner, who shall hold his office for 

four year6 and until hia successor shall be alected 

and qualified. . . . ” (Emphasis added) 

This provision leaves no room for interpretation and it must be 

obeyed. There must be one commissioner from each of four precincts, 

elected by the voter8 of each precinct. 

Your question wa*: “II the at-large method of electing County 

Commisrioners constitutional in light of Article 5, Section 18 of the 

Texas Constitution? ” 

We answer that it is not. 

p. 135 
The Honorable Joe W. Hayes, page 2 (H-32) 

We would also call to your attention the decision in Avery v. Midland 

County, 390 U. S. 474, 20 L. Ed. 2d 45, 88 S. Ct. 1114 (1968), holding that 

the “one man - one vat :e” rule applied to the election of commissioners 

and that it was not permissible for members of the commissioners 

court to be apportioned among single-member districts of substantially 

unequal population. 

SUMMARY 

Article 5, 0 18 of the Constitution of the State 

of Texas specifically requires that there shall be 

four commissioner’s precincts in each county and that 

the county commissioners shall each be elected by 

the qualified voters of one of those precincts - not 

at-large. 

Very truly yours, 

v Attorney General of Texas 

DAVID M,. KENDALL, Chairman 

Opinion Committee 

p. 136
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of New Hampshire (FEMA-1812-DR), dated 01/02/2009. *Incident:*
                         Severe Winter Storm. *Incident Period:*
                         12/11/2008 and continuing.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         01/02/2009. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         03/03/2009. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/02/2009.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to:  U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road,  Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,  U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 01/02/2009, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. *The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster:* *Primary Counties:*
                     Belknap, Carroll, Cheshire, Coos, Grafton, Hillsborough, Merrimack, Rockingham, Strafford, Sullivan. *The Interest Rates are:* PercentOther (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
4.500Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11605B and for economic injury is 11606B
 (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Herbert L. Mitchell, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E9-419 Filed 1-12-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P