alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4659 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4659

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the USA PATRIOT ACT to extend the sunset of certain provisions 
                              of such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE USA PATRIOT ACT.

    Section 224(a) of the Uniting and Strengthening America by 
Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct 
Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001 (Public Law 107-56; 115 Stat. 
295) is amended by striking ``February 3, 2006'' and inserting ``March 
10, 2006''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 1, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4659

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the USA PATRIOT ACT to extend the sunset of certain provisions 
                              of such Act.
```
EXHIBIT 10(B)



 EXHIBIT (10)(b) 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of Additional
Information and to the use of our reports: (1) dated April 3, 2012, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio and (2) dated April 13, 2012, with respect to the financial
statements of the subaccounts of WRL Series Annuity Account, included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 26 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 33-49556) under the Securities Act of 1933 and related Prospectus of WRL Freedom Attainer Variable
Annuity. 
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
 Des Moines, Iowa 
 April 13, 2012
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00221-CR

Aspen Warren

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 396th District Court

of Tarrant County (1443873D)

August 9, 2018

Opinion by Justice Pittman

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Mark T. Pittman_________________

 Justice Mark T. Pittman
Comparison of a Time Temperature Indicator (TTI) in different environments (temperatures).
#### State v. Hofer

2016 MT 328N

DA 15-0560

12/13/16

Affirmed

Dist. 17 (Valley)
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 15, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 2993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2012-30953]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9764-2]

Public Water System Supervision Program Approval for the State of 
Ohio

Correction

    In notice document 2012-30953, appearing on pages 76034-76035 in 
the issue of Wednesday, December 26, 2012, make the following 
corrections:
    On page 76035, in the first column, in the first full paragraph:
    1. In lines three and four ``January 23, 2013'' should read 
``January 25, 2013''.
    2. In line ten ``January 23, 2013'' should read ``January 25, 
2013''.
    3. In line twenty ``January 23, 2013'' should read ``January 25, 
2013''.

[FR Doc. C1-2012-30953 Filed 1-14-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4659 Received in Senate (RDS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4659

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 2006

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the USA PATRIOT ACT to extend the sunset of certain provisions 
                              of such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE USA PATRIOT ACT.

    Section 224(a) of the Uniting and Strengthening America by 
Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct 
Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001 (Public Law 107-56; 115 Stat. 
295) is amended by striking ``February 3, 2006'' and inserting ``March 
10, 2006''.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Montana Twenty First Judicial District Court. County of Ravalli.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- DAVID GEORGE DAHL, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-13-143

ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCE REVIEW HEARING

On January 20, 2016, the Defendant’s suspended sentence was revoked for violation of the conditions of his probation and he was sentenced to be committed to a prison operated by the Montana Department of Corrections, for a period of five (5) years, for the offense of Charge I - Partner or Family Member Assault, third or subsequent offense, a felony. Furthermore the Court ordered that the Defendant not be eligible for parole for a term of five (5) years pursuant to the parties’ recommendations. The Court granted credit for time served for 141 days served in Cause No. DC-15-193 and credit for 192 days served in Cause No. DC-13-143, to be served concurrently.

On August 4, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Peter Ohman of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the *68Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Done in open Court this 4th day of August, 2016.

DATED this 24th day of August, 2016.

Mr. Dahl was in front of the Sentence Review Division on this day for two cases: DC-13-143 and DC-15-193. During the hearing for DC-15-193, Judge Newman questioned whether the sentence was in fact illegal as written. Mr. Ohman agreed that it appeared to be the case and requested that Mr. Dahl’s sentence review hearing be continued to the November 2016 hearings to have additional time to follow up. Likewise, Mr. Ohman requested to continue the sentence review hearing for DC-13-143. Mr. Ohman submitted Exhibit 1 of a doctor’s letter which was returned to him to use when the hearing is continued in November 2016.

It is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the application for review of sentence is CONTINUED to the next available hearings in November 2016. Notification will be sent to interested parties four weeks prior providing the actual time and date of the hearing.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member and Hon. Brad Newman, Member.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 11300 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
RUDY AYALA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13

- CR

- 83

- 1

Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Rudy Ayala appeals his guilty plea conviction of possession of counterfeit postal keys and the 120

- month , above

- guidelines sentence imposed by the district court. He argues that the district court improperly participated in the plea negotiations and that his sentence is procedurally and substantively
unreasonable.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 30, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-11300 Document: 00512786785 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/30/2014No. 13

- 11300

Ayala did not raise his claims below. Consequently, we review his claims for plain error. See Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). The district court did not engage in plea negotiations when it rejected Ayala’s initial ple a agreement; rather, it properly stated its reasons for rejecting the plea. See United States v. Hemphill , 748 F.3d 666, 672

- 73 (5th Cir. 2014). Because the district court did not interfere in plea negotiations or specify an acceptable plea agreement, it did not violate Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1). See United States v. Smith , 417 F.3d 483, 488 (5th Cir. 2005). The record reflects that the district court properly considered the sentencing factors set forth at 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) in imposi ng a sentence outside of the guidelines range. See United States v. Brantley , 537 F.3d 347,
349

- 50 (5th Cir. 2008). The district court explained that the sentence was necessary because Ayala was a danger to society due to his extensive criminal history, which was substantially underrepresented by the guidelines range. Thus, the district court’s reasons for the sentence were fact

- specific and consistent with the § 3553(a) factors. See United States v. Smith , 440 F.3d 704, 707 (5th Cir. 2006).
The extent of the departure, while substantial, does not constitute error. This court has upheld variances of similar magnitude. See United States v. Segura , 747 F.3d 323, 326

- 27 (5th Cir. 2014); Smith , 417 F.3d at 491

- 93. Ayala has shown no error, plain or other wise, by the district court. Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 13-11300 Document: 00512786785 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/30/2014
No. 09-7900.

#### Dock McNeely, Petitioner v. County of Sacramento, California, et al.

559 U.S. 945, 130 S. Ct. 1515,

176 L. Ed. 2d 123,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1299.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 344 Fed. Appx. 317.
#### Atlantic Coast Line Railway Company, a Corporation, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. A. Rosen; *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February 27, 1926.

*Alexander Akerman*and *W. B. Crawford,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Kribbs & Steed,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and argument of counsel *375for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4768 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4768

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 21, 2006

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 777 Corporation Street in Beaver, Pennsylvania, as the ``Robert Linn 
                    Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROBERT LINN MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 777 Corporation Street in Beaver, Pennsylvania, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Robert Linn Memorial Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert 
Linn Memorial Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 20, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. 11-6647.

#### Derrick Rayshawn Parks, aka Bam Parks, aka Rayshawn Parks, Petitioner v. United States. Tremayne Kendrick Blackwell, Petitioner v. United States.

No. 11-7068.

565 U.S. 1160, 132 S. Ct. 1093,

181 L. Ed. 2d 984,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 758.

January 17, 2012.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same cases below, 436 Fed. Appx. 192.
No. 11-5315.

#### Mark Hines, Petitioner v. Tennessee.

565 U.S. 1080, 132 S. Ct. 813,

181 L. Ed. 2d 528,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8679,

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Division, denied.
No. 83920 

FILE 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

MM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., 

A NEVADA CORPORATION, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; 

AND THE HONORABLE JESSICA K. 

PETERSON, DISTRICT JUDGE, 

Respondents, 

and 

TRYKE COMPANIES SO NV, LLC, A 

NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY 

COMPANY, 

Real Party in Interest. 

ORDER DENYING PETITION 

This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a 

district court order denying a motion for judgment on the pleadings. Having 

considered the petition and its supporting documentation, we are not 

persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is 

warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 

P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the 

burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. 

Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing 

that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole 

discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Specifically, 

we generally decline to exercise our discretion to grant writ petitions 

challenging orders denying motions for judgment on the pleadings, and we 

are not convinced any of the exceptions apply in this case. See Chur v. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

-0(42_18 
Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 136 Nev. 68, 70, 458 P.3d 336, 339 (2020) 

(discussing the exceptions to the general rule). We therefore 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

, J. 

Hardesty 

4,444.1,12 , 

Stiglich Herndon 

, J. 

cc: Hon. Jessica K. Peterson, District Judge 

Kemp Jones, LLP 

H1 Law Group 

Conant Law Firm 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

2
No. 10-844.

#### Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd., et al., Petitioners v. Novo Nordisk A/S, et al.

565 U.S. 1012, 132 S. Ct. 570,

181 L. Ed. 2d 394,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7928.

November 7, 2011.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.
****************************** 

 * MONOGRAPH: MCW/LRP 03 

 ****************************** 

ITEM: Beef Teriyaki with Rice, Cooked, Dehydrated (BTD) 

 (170 gm brick pack) 

 NSN: 8940-01-467-1899 ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR-B-017 

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE: 682 Kilocalories (PRIMARY) 

 

DEHYDRATED CHARACTERISTICS: 

APPEARANCE: Powdered brown colored sauce mixture, 1⁄4”- 1⁄2” medium brown diced 

beef pieces, medium-long- grain off-white rice with smooth surface, diced/pieces red 

pepper, peapods, sliced water chestnuts, mushroom pieces, peanut halves and pineapple 

pieces. 

ODOR: Beef, rice, vegetables, teriyaki, faint fishy. 

FLAVOR: Beef, rice, vegetables, teriyaki 

TEXTURE: Powdery sauce mixture, dry brittle components*, very dry mouth-feel. 

 

REHYDRATED CHARACTERISTICS: 

APPEARANCE: Dark brown teriyaki sauce, 1⁄4” - 1⁄2” medium brown diced beef pieces, 

medium- long-grain off-white rice, diced/pieces red pepper, peapods, sliced water 

 chestnuts, mushroom pieces, peanut halves and pineapple pieces. 

ODOR: Beef, rice, vegetables, teriyaki. 

FLAVOR: Beef, rice, vegetables, teriyaki. 

TEXTURE: Moist-tender beef, slightly soft-slightly firm rice and vegetables, crunchy 

peanuts and water chestnuts, soft pineapple and moderately thick sauce. 

DEFECTS LIKELY TO OCCUR: 

APPEARANCE: Dehydrated and rehydrated: Darkening or loss of color of sauce, rice, 

beef and vegetables. 

 

ODOR: Dehydrated and Rehydrated: Cardboard, oxidized, stale, rancid, grassy, loss of 

spice, scorched, burnt, and strong fishy. 
FLAVOR: Dehydrated and rehydrated: Cardboard, oxidized, rancid, scorched, burnt, loss 

of spices, grassy, rancid peanuts. 

TEXTURE: Dehydrated: Very hard, tacky components. Rehydrated: Unrehydrated 

product, slight crystalline chewy dry beef, hardening of rice, excess water. 

*SPECIAL NOTES: Some ingredients such as rice, pasta or bacon may not be freeze 

dehydrated and will not easily crush to powder.
HUNTSMAN CORPORATION HUNGARY 

ANALYTICAL LABORATORY 

GC-MS REPORT 

SANITIZED
THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 20590 

September 19, 2014 ,, ' ,_,. q .. ~ 

The Honorable Richard Shelby 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

Dear Senator Shelby: 

Thank you for your letter supporting the application submitted by the Montgomery Regional 

Airport Authority for a grant under the U.S. Department ofTransportation's Small Community 

Air Service Development Program. 

The Small Conmtunity Air Service Development Progran1 was established to help smaller 

communities address air service defi.ciencies, particularly issues related to high airfares and 

insufficient service. Under the statute, the Department may make a maximum of 40 grant 

awards each year, although no more than four may be to communities in the same State. To 

provide communities with latitude in developing solutions to their air service deficiencies, the 

statute provides flexibility in the types of air service development projects that can be funded. 

On June 30, the Department issued an order setting a deadline of July 31 for applications. As 

these grant requests are pending before the Depru1ment, I cannot comment on the merits of any 

particular proposal. I assure you, however, that the Department will give full and fair 

consideration to all proposals that have been properly filed. 

As is our standard practice, I am placing a copy of your letter and this response in Docket 

DOT~OST-2014-0113 as a contact outside the record of this matter. I appreciate your interest in 

this program. 
RICHARD SHELBY 

ALAS,\IvlA 

n 

The Honorable Anthony Foxx 

S~crctary ofT ransportation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue. SE 

Washington. D.C. 20590 

Re: DOT-OST-2014-0113 

Dear Mr. Foxx: 

WASHINGTOf,J, DC 20510-0103 

August I, 2014 

I write to express my support for the grant application submitted by the Montgomery 

Regional Airport (the Airp()rt) f()r the Small Community Air Service Development (SCASD) 

grant administered by the Department of Transportation. 

The Montgomery Regional Airport provides air carrier and general aviation services to 

the Central Alabama River Region. It also supports a F-16 Air Guard Unit and an Army Guard 

Aviation Support Facility. Additionally. the Airport serves as one of Alabama's major regional 

commercial airports. 

A recent study found that over seventy percent of airline passengers in the Montgomery 

area utilize alternati\'c airports. lt is my understanding that if awarded this grant. the Airport 

plans to launch marketing efforts to encourage air I inc passengers to choose the Montgomery 

Regional Airport l()r their travel. This would accompany the recent partnership between the 

Montgomery Area Chamber of Commerce and the Airport already focusing on improving the 

Airport's traffic. 

[ ask that, in accordance with all federal rules and procedures, full consideration be given 

ttl l'v1ontgomcry Regional :'\irpo;·t's grant applic~ltion. P!ea:~e C0!1t~1c~ mv oft?ce with anv further . - questions. 

Sincerely. 

Richard Shelby 

RCS~jmd 

51~140819..022
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 151 (Thursday, August 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 42059]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-21011]



[[Page 42059]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management


Order Extending Temporary Closure to Non-Authorized Use of 
Certain Public Lands in Ward Valley, San Bernardino County, California

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Needles Field Office.

ACTION: Order extending for one year the temporary order of closure to 
non-authorized uses of certain public lands in Ward Valley.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: BLM is extending for one year the initial temporary closure of 
approximately 2,000 acres within Ward Valley, California, as published 
in the Federal Register on January 29, 1998, 63 FR 4467. The initial 
closure order was effective February 13, 1998, and was effective for a 
period of six months from that date. The lands involved in this 
extension and the scope of the closure are not changed.

EFFECTIVE DATE: By this extension, the closure order will continue in 
effect and will remain effective until August 13, 1999.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This order extending the closure to non-
authorized uses of the Ward Valley lands is necessary to facilitate BLM 
management of authorized activities on the Ward Valley site, protect 
the desert tortoise and its critical habitat, and prevent unnecessary 
damage to sensitive natural resources. In light of questions raised 
regarding the authority of the California Department of Health Services 
to purchase the site, actions to proceed with on-site testing described 
in the initial order of closure will not go forward at present. 
However, lifting the closure would increase the likelihood of greater 
public use and the potential for adverse impacts from uncontrolled day 
and overnight activities. Such uncontrolled activities could generate 
additional traffic and litter; increase risk of fire, dust, and noise; 
adversely affect the desert tortoise and its critical habitat as well 
as other wildlife species and their habitats; damage vegetation; and 
pose additional environmental and safety problems. Therefore, continued 
closure of the affected lands would protect sensitive natural resources 
while allowing authorized users to continue to utilize the site under 
controlled conditions.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Molly Brady, Needles Field Office 
Manager, U.S.D.I., Bureau of Land Management, Needles Resource Area, 
101 West Spikes Road, Needles, California 92363, tel: (760) 326-7000.

    Approved.
Ed Hastey,
BLM State Director, California State Office.
[FR Doc. 98-21011 Filed 8-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P