Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 38 / Friday, February 27, 2009 / Notices 8939 

What Is the Next Step in the Process for 

this ICR? 

EPA will consider the comments 

received and amend the ICR as 

appropriate. The final ICR package will 

then be submitted to OMB for review 

and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 

1320.12. At that time, EPA will issue 

another Federal Register notice 

pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to 

announce the submission of the ICR to 

OMB and the opportunity to submit 

additional comments to OMB. If you 

have any questions about this ICR or the 

approval process, please contact the 

technical person listed under FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. 

Dated: February 23, 2009. 

Deborah Y. Dietrich, 

Director, Office of Emergency Management. 

[FR Doc. E9–4230 Filed 2–26–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–8590–9] 

Environmental Impact Statements and 

Regulations; Availability of EPA 

Comments 

Availability of EPA comments 

prepared pursuant to the Environmental 

Review Process (ERP), under section 

309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 

102(2) (c) of the National Environmental 

Policy Act as amended. Requests for 

copies of EPA comments can be directed 

to the Office of Federal Activities at 

202–564–7146. 

An explanation of the ratings assigned 

to draft environmental impact 

statements (EISs) was published in FR 

dated April 6, 2008 (73 FR 19833). 

Draft EISs 

EIS No. 20080375, ERP No. D–NOA– 

B91005–00, Amendment 3 to the 

Northeast Skate Complex Fishery 

Management Plan, Implementation of 

New Management Measures to 

Rebuild Overfished Skate Stocks, End 

Overfishing of Skate Fisheries, Gulf of 

Maine (GOM), Georges Bank (GB), 

South New England and Mid-Atlantic 

Regions. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

proposed project. Rating LO. 

EIS No. 20080414, ERP No. D–COE– 

D39038–00, PROGRAMMATIC— 

Oyster Restoration in Chesapeake Bay 

Including the Use of a Native and/or 

Nonnative Oyster, Implementation, 

Chesapeake Bay, MD and VA. 

Summary: EPA believes that the 

introduction of non-native oyster 

species to the Chesapeake Bay, could be 

environmentally unsatisfactory to 

public health and the Bay ecosystem. 

Rating EU2. 

EIS No. 20080508, ERP No. D–COE– 

F35047–OH, Lorain Harbor. Ohio 

Federal Navigation Project, Dredged 

Material Management Plan, 

Implementation, Lorain Harbor, 

Lorain County, Ohio. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

proposed action. Rating LO. 

EIS No. 20080519, ERP No. D–NPS– 

D61062–PA, White-tailed Deer 

Management Plan, Develop a Deer 

Management Strategy that Support 

Protection, Preservation and 

Restoration of Native Vegetation, 

Implementation, Valley Forge 

National Historical Park, King of 

Prussia, PA. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

proposed action. Rating LO. 

EIS No. 20080520, ERP No. D–CGD– 

A11082–00, USCG Pacific Operations: 

Districts 11 Area, California and 

Districts 13 Area, Oregon and 

Washington, Improve the Protection 

and Conservation of Marine Protected 

Species and Marine Protected Areas, 

CA, OR and WA. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

proposed project. Rating LO. 

EIS No. 20080527, ERP No. D–AFS– 

K65350–CA, Modoc National Forest 

Motorized Travel Management Plan, 

Implementation, National Forest 

Transportation System (NFTS), 

Modoc, Lassen and Siskiyou 

Counties, CA. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about impacts 

from continued use of roads and trails 

within or adjacent to fens, wet 

meadows, riparian habitat, and vernal 

pools. Rating EC2. 

EIS No. 20080539, ERP No. D–USA– 

A10078–00, Gulf of Mexico Range 

Complex (GOMEX), Proposed Action 

is to Support and Conduct Current 

and Emerging Training and RDT&E 

Operations, TX, MS, AL and FL. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

proposed project. Rating LO. 

EIS No. 20080143, ERP No. DA–COE– 

B32009–MA, Boston Harbor Federal 

Deep Draft Navigation Improvement 

Project, To Evaluate the Feasibility of 

Channel Deepening and Related Berth 

Improvements at the Port of Boston, 

Chelsea and Revere, Boston, MA. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental objections because of the 

lack of information relative to the extent 

and impacts of blasting and the proposal 

to create rock reefs. Rating EO2. 

Final EISs 

EIS No. 20080433, ERP No. F–COE– 

C35013–00, PROGRAMMATIC—Port 

of New York and New Jersey Dredged 

Material Management Plan, Updated 

Information on 1999 Final EIS, 

Implementation, NY and NJ. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns because some 

of the information in the Final EIS is 

outdated and is not consistent with the 

current Dredged Material Management 

Plan. 

EIS No. 20080491, ERP No. F–SFW– 

B64005–00, Lake Umbagog National 

Wildlife Refuge, Comprehensive 

Conservation Plan, 15 Year Guidance 

for Management of Refuge Operations, 

Habitat and Visitor Services, 

Implementation, Coos County, NH 

and Oxford County, ME. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

proposed project. 

EIS No. 20080536, ERP No. F–COE– 

K39099–CA, Berth 97–109 (China 

Shipping) Container Terminal Project, 

Construction and Operation, Issuance 

of Section 404 (CWA) and Section 10 

Rivers and Harbor Act Permits, Port of 

Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, CA. 

Summary: EPA continues to have 

environmental concerns about 

significant and unavoidable impacts to 

air quality and environmental justice 

communities, and impacts to aquatic 

resources. EPA recommended 

commitments to mitigate air emissions 

to meet health risk reduction targets, 

implementation of a health impact 

assessment to identify appropriate 

mitigations for disproportionately 

affected neighboring communities and 

avoidance of fill. 

Dated: February 24, 2009. 

Robert W. Hargrove, 

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office 

of Federal Activities. 

[FR Doc. E9–4226 Filed 2–26–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–8590–8] 

Environmental Impacts Statements; 

Notice of Availability 

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal 

Activities, General Information (202) 

564–1399 or http://www.epa.gov/ 

compliance/nepa/. 

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact 

Statements 

Filed 02/16/2009 through 02/20/2009 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2