alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-6143.

#### Byron Elroy Crutcher, Petitioner v. Nevada.

565 U.S. 973, 132 S. Ct. 514,

181 L. Ed. 2d 344,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7664.

October 31, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Same case below, 127 Nev. 1128, 373 P.3d 907.
No. 11-7710.

#### Michael Upton Kershaw, Petitioner v. Mike Evans, Warden.

565 U.S. 1182, 132 S. Ct. 1153,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1025,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 922.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 411 Fed. Appx. 996.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the Estate of Richard E. * From the 39th District Court

Mathis, Jr., deceased, of Haskell County,

 Trial Court No. 12,103

No. 11-16-00115-CV * March 15, 2018

 * Opinion by Bailey, J.

 (Panel consists of: Willson, J.,

 Bailey, J., and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

 by assignment)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is error in the judgment below. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is 

affirmed insofar as it dismissed Michael Mathis’s claims. The judgment of the 

trial court is reversed with respect to the trial court’s non-award of attorney’s 

fees, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a determination of 

Richard V. Mathis and Betty Mathis’s attorney’s fees consistent with this 

opinion. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Michael 

Mathis.
ENG-12.31.11 Exh 10.43






EXHIBIT 10.43


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE ENGLOBAL 401(K) PLAN


WHEREAS, ENGlobal Engineering, Inc. (the "Employer") adopted a restatement of the ENGlobal 401(k) Plan (the "Plan"), effective as of January 1, 2010; and


WHEREAS, the Employer has the ability to amend the Plan pursuant to Article 11.1; and


WHEREAS, the Employer now desires to amend the Plan to recognize prior service with Control Dynamics International, LP (CDI).  NOW, THEREFORE, 


RESOLVED, that the Company hereby amends the Plan in the following respects, effective as of April 1, 2010:


RESOLVED FURTHER, that Section 2.2 of the Adoption Agreement is amended as follows:


2.2    Predecessor Service. Service with the following entity or entities will be credited as: 


		
	•
	Triangle Engineers & Constructors, Inc.; 


		
	•
	RPM Engineering, Inc.; 


		
	•
	Petrocon of Louisiana, Inc.; 


		
	•
	Constant Power Manufacturing, Inc.; 


		
	•
	IDS Engineering, Inc.; 


		
	•
	Alliance Engineering Associates, Inc.; 


		
	•
	Advanced Control Engineering, Inc.; 


		
	•
	ESD&C; 


		
	•
	ATI; 


		
	•
	Control Dynamics International, LP (CDI)




(a)    Elective Deferrals, QMACs and QNECs. Service with an entity listed above will be given for eligibility purposes under Section 3.2(a) of the Adoption Agreement.


(d)    Non-Safe Harbor Matching Contributions. Service with an entity listed above will be credited for: 
Eligibility purposes under Section 3.2(d) of the Adoption Agreement
Vesting purposes under Section 10.4 of the Adoption Agreement


RESOLVED FURTHER, that in all other respects, the terms of the Plan are hereby ratified and confirmed.


RESOLVED FURTHER, that any action taken by any of the officers of the Company prior to the adoption of these resolutions that is within the authority conferred herein be, and it hereby is, ratified, confirmed and approved.



1
**Exhibit 34.2**

** **

** **

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

 

The Board of Directors

U.S. Bank National Association

 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform (the “Platform”), for which the Company provides trustee, securities administration, registrar and paying agent services, as of and for the year ended November 3, 2019, except for servicing criteria Items 1122 (d)(1)(i)-(v), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(vi)-(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), and 1122 (d)(4)(i)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended November 3, 2019, for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/Ernst & Young LLP

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota

December 20, 2019

 

----
### The Honorab le Harold D. Vietor, United States District Judge 1 

### for the Southern District of Iowa. ___________ No. 96-3302

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Rick Lloyd Carmer, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: January 7, 1997 Filed: January 10, 1997

___________ Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Rick Ll oyd Carmer pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession o f a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court 1 grante dthe government’s motion for a downward departure under U.S . SentencingGuidelines Manual § 5K1.1, p.s. (substantial assistance), and sentenced him to 20 months imprisonment. Carmer argues on appeal that the dis trict court improperly concluded it did not have authority to depart downward based on his dru g reha bilitative efforts and the deferral of parole on an Iowa term o f imprisonment. After carefully reviewing the record we conclude that the district court did not err in sentencing Carmer, and we accordingly affirm the judgment.

### -2- A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Zhejiang Yong Xing Digital Technology
Co. Ltd.


Share-holding Entrustment Agreement


 


Zhejiang Yong Xing Digital Technology Co.
Ltd. (“Zhejiang”) was organized on July 11, 2005. This entrustment agreement (hereinafter called as “this agreement”)
was signed by following parties (hereinafter called as “agreement parties”)


 


Party A: Capital Future Development
Limited (“Capital”) was lawfully established on July 22, 2004. Capital has the right to enjoy the actual shareholder’s
rights and has the right to obtain any benefits Party B received from Zhejiang.


 


Party B: Xiaochun Wang is a citizen
of PRC, his national ID number is ___________________________. Xiaochun Wang is the nominal holder of 15% equity of Zhejiang.


 


		I.	Being as the actual investor of share-holding on behalf of the holder, Party A has the right to enjoy
actual shareholder’s rights and has the right to obtain relevant investing income received by Party B.



		II.	Party A will take the full legal and economic responsibilities in association with the acquisition
of Zhejiang’s equity as well as executing the share-holding entrustment.



		III.	Party A is the actual owner of Zhejiang’s equity. Party B will hold the shares on behalf of
Party A. Party B will follow Party A’s command to perform all the relevant procedures to complete the share-holding entrustment.



		IV.	Any modification or cancellation for this agreement will go into effect only after both parties have
signed the written agreement. Any party can not modify or cancel this agreement without consent of the other party. When the agreement
parties have disputes with respect to interpretation and implementation of items of this agreement, all parties shall settle disputes
through friendly negotiation. Either party can seek arbitration to make a settlement per Hongkong rules and law if the disputes
can’t be settled through negotiation. The arbitration locale is Hongkong.



		V.	This agreement is in duplicate and each party holds one. This agreement will go into effect since
Party A’s authorized representative affixes the signature and the official seal and Party B Together affixes the signature.



 


Party A: Capital Future Development
Limited (stamp)


Authorized representative:/s/ Zhenggang Wang
(signature)


 


Party B: Xiaochun Wang: /s/ Xiaochun
Wang (signature)
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 7375

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. NORWOOD COOK , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Harrisonburg

. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. ( 5:02

- cr - 30087

- JPJ

- 1 )

Submitted : February 21, 2023 Decided: February 24, 2023

Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Norwood Cook , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7375 Doc: 6 Filed: 02/24/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Norwood Cook appeals the distri ct court’s order denying his motion for relief from its November 19, 2020, order denying his motion for reconsideration of its May 21, 2020, order forfeiting a substitute asset under 21 U.S.C. § 853(p) and Fed. R.
Crim. P. 32.2(e)(1)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. United States v. Cook , No. 5:02

- cr 30087

- JPJ

- 1 (W.D. Va. Oct. 28, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-7375 Doc: 6 Filed: 02/24/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 11


V-TWIN ACQUISITIONS, INC.
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND JULY 31, 1998

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Three Months
                                                               Ended Dec. 31,         July 31,
                                                                    1998               1998
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                             <C>                <C>      
     Shares Outstanding..............................             3,000,000          1,000,000
     Weighted average shares outstanding.............             3,000,000          1,000,000
     Net Income (Loss)...............................           $ ( 14,148)          $  - 0 -
     Total Net Income (Loss) Available for Common Stockholders' $ ( 14, 148)         $  - 0 -
                                                                ============         =========

     Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
     Earnings (Loss) Per Share                                     $0.00                $0.00
                                                                    ----                -----
</TABLE>





V-TWIN ACQUISITIONS, INC.
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND JULY 31, 1998



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Six Months
                                                               Ended Dec. 31,         July 31,
                                                                   1998                 1998
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                             <C>                 <C>      
     Shares Outstanding.............................              3,000,000           1,000,000
     Weighted average shares outstanding............              3,000,000           1,000,000
     Net Income (Loss)..............................             $( 24,148)           $  - 0 -
     Total Net Income (Loss) Available for Common Stockholders'  $( 24, 148)          $  - 0 -
                                                                ============          =========

     Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
     Earnings (Loss) Per Share                                    $(0.01)                $0.00
                                                                   ------                -----
</TABLE>
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 18254 STANDARD 45.05 4.30 15.20

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

DLA/NAVY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT October 29, 2018

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, 100% COTTON, JERSEY KNIT A-A-50013G

(NUGGET)

Shade Number BROWN 3759 Piece/Roll Number 18254
DLA TROOP SUPPORT M 4155.6 *

SUBSECTION 201.1

DLA TROOP SUPPORT-FTRE *

August 2011 *

DLA TROOP SUPPORT SUBSISTENCE INSPECTION MANUAL 4155.6 *

INSPECTION PLANNING

Plan for the Inspection Job

I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE. The purpose of this Subsection is to document policy and procedures for 

use of a formal Plan for the Inspection Job (PIJ) (DSCP Form 3587). It is applicable to acquisition 

quality assurance inspection (Class 4) when performed by Military Quality Assurance Representatives.

II. POLICY.

 A. PIJs shall be prepared for each contractor where both inspections by DLA Troop Support Manual 4155.5 

(Subsistence Contractor Inspection Procedures Manual) is a contractual requirement, and acquisition quality 

assurance inspection (Class 4) by Military Quality Assurance Representative during processing is required. 

 B. PIJs shall be prepared for each contractor in accordance with each Major Command Veterinarian 

instructions. The PIJs may remain in effect for an indefinite period; however, it must be reviewed 

annually and renegotiated whenever significant changes occur.

 

III. RESPONSIBILITIES.

 A. Chief, Food Safety Office, Directorate of Subsistence (DLA Troop Support-FTW) is responsible for *

developing policy 

guidance and evaluating the program.

 B. Each Major Command Veterinarian is responsible for development and publication of procedures 

for preparing PIJs.

 C. MEDDAC/MEDCEN Deputy Commanders for Veterinary Services, Major Command Staff 

Veterinarian or Officer-In-Charge, as appropriate, are responsible for assuring that complete PIJs are 

prepared and maintained for contractors producing under DLA Troop Support contracts as specified in 

paragraph II.A.

 

IV. DISTRIBUTION.

 A. Completed PIJs shall be distributed as follows: (may use electronic means) 

Commander

DLA Troop Support *

ATTN: DLA Troop Support-FTW * 

Bldg 6-C

700 Robbins Ave

Philadelphia, PA 19111-8419

 B. First carbon or electronic copy to contractor. 

 C. Other copies: As determined by Major Command Veterinarian. 
 

 D. A copy of the completed PIJ for operational ration assembly plants shall be provided to:

Commander

U.S. Army Health Services Command

2050 Worth Road

Suite E

Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234-6005

BY ORDER OF THE COMMANDER

KATHYN YONTZ 

Chief, Support Services Division

Directorate of Support

1 Encl

DISTRIBUTION

 Special

__________________________________________

This Subsection supercedes Subsection 201.1, dated April 2010

* Denotes Change
No. 11-669.

#### Mary Kate Breeden, Petitioner v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

565 U.S. 1158, 132 S. Ct. 1116,

181 L. Ed. 2d 981,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 853.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 396 U.S. App. D.C. 170, 646 F.3d 43.
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CARLOS McDONALD Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County

No. 97-02521 Chris Craft, Judge
No. W1999-01459-CCA-R3-CD - Decided July 24, 2000

JUDGMENT Came the appellant,

Carlos McDonald, by counsel, and also came the Attorney General on behalf of the State, and this case was heard on the record on appeal from the Criminal Court of Shelby County; and upon consideration thereof, this Court is of the opinion that there is no reversible error on the record and that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

In accordance w

ith the Opinion filed herein, it is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by this Court thatthe judgment of the trial court is affirmed, and the case is remanded to the Criminal Court of Shelby County for the execution of the judgment of that Court and for the collection of the costs accrued below.

It appearing that the appellan t, Carlos McDonald

, is indigent, costs

of the appeal will be paid by the State of Tennessee.
≥95% (1 awardees)

75% - 94% (4 awardees)

50% - 74% (18 awardees)

25% - 49% (20 awardee)

<25% (10 awardee)

No IIS (1 awardee)

No data (2 awardees)

Percentage of adults aged ≥19 years participating in an immunization 

information system -- United States, five cities§, and D.C., 2015

National Participation: 38% (excluding Territories)

Source: CY2015 IISAR

§ Chicago, IL; Houston, TX; New York City, NY; Philadelphia, PA; San Antonio, TX.

Last Date Updated: June 16, 2017
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of theglobe.com  (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending  September  30, 2003, as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Robin  Segaul
Lebowitz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2003


/s/ Robin Segaul Lebowitz
-------------------------
Robin Segaul Lebowitz
Chief Financial Officer




                                       39
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 147 (Friday, July 31, 1998)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 41175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20704]



[[Page 41173]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part VI





The President





_______________________________________________________________________



Notice of July 28, 1998--Continuation of Iraqi Emergency


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 147 / Friday, July 31, 1998 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 41175]]

                Notice of July 28, 1998

                
Continuation of Iraqi Emergency

                On August 2, 1990, by Executive Order 12722, President 
                Bush declared a national emergency to deal with the 
                unusual and extraordinary threat to the national 
                security and foreign policy of the United States 
                constituted by the actions and policies of the 
                Government of Iraq. By Executive Orders 12722 of August 
                2, 1990, and 12724 of August 9, 1990, the President 
                imposed trade sanctions on Iraq and blocked Iraqi 
                government assets. Because the Government of Iraq has 
                continued its activities hostile to United States 
                interests in the Middle East, the national emergency 
                declared on August 2, 1990, and the measures adopted on 
                August 2 and August 9, 1990, to deal with that 
                emergency must continue in effect beyond August 2, 
                1998. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of 
                the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am 
                continuing the national emergency with respect to Iraq.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    July 28, 1998.

[FR Doc. 98-20704
Filed 7-30-98; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JUAN C. ACOSTA

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 15

- 3514

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,

ETC., ET AL.

,

Appellee s

.

________________________________/

Opinion filed August 2, 2016

Non

- Final Appeal from the

Circuit C ourt for Marion

County

, Victor J. Musleh , Judge.

Juan C. Acosta, Dunnellon, pro se.

Jacqueline Costoya, and

Kelley Kronenberg, Fort Lauderdale,

for Appellee Bank of New York Mellon

.

No appearance for remaining Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Decker v. Kaplus , 763 So. 2d 1229 (Fla. 5 th DCA 2000).

EVANDER, BERGER and WALLIS , JJ., concur.