alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In-Person Attendees: The Commercial Prerinse Spray Valve Framework Meeting Meeting Date: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax Baldwin, Jeff Engineering Manager T & S Brass and Bronze Works, Inc. 2 Saddleback Cove, P.O. Box 1088 Travelers Rest SC 29690 864-834-4102 864-660-6349 Brookman, Douglas Facilitator Public Solutions, Inc. 108 Newburg Avenue Baltimore MD 21228410-719-0580 410-719-0581 Cannon, Holly Environmental Scientist ERG 14555 Avion Parkway, Suite 200 Chantilly VA 20151 703-786-8038 N/A Cymbalsky, John Supervisory Operations Research Analyst U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence Avenue, SW WashingtonDC 20585 202-287-1692 202-586-4617 Groen, Sarah L. UAE Desk Officer Office of Arabian Penninsula Affairs 2201 C Street, NW, Room 4224 WashingtonDC 20520202-647-6562 202- 736-4449 Hansen, Dain M. Director Government Relations International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO) 101 Constitution Avenue NW Suite L110 WashingtonDC 20001 202-414-6177 202-289-3792 Kumar, Mythri V. N/A Navigant Consulting, Inc. 1200 19th Street NW, Suite 700 WashingtonDC 20036202-973-3183 202-973-2401 Lewis, Jessica N/A Navigant Consulting, Inc. 1200 19th Street NW, Suite 700 WashingtonDC 20036202-973-6585 202-973-2401 Marantan, PhD, Aris Associate Director Navigant Consulting, Inc. 1200 19th Street, NW, Suite 500 WashingtonDC 20036202-973-4501 202-973-2401 Morris, Scott Statistician and Energy Analyst Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) 902 Battelle Boulevard P.O. Box 999, MSIN K6-05 Richland WA 99352 509-372-6454 N/A Osann, Edward R. N/A Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) 1314 Second Street Santa Monica CA 90401 310-434-2300 310-434-2399 Raba, James D. (Jim) Energy Technology Program Specialist U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence Avenue, SW WashingtonDC 20585 202-586-8654 202-586-4617 Salmon, Stephanie Vice President - Government Affairs Plumbing Manufacturers International (PMI) 25 Massachussetts Ave., NW, Suite 800 WashingtonDC 20001 202-452-7135 N/A Sher, Celia M General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of General Counsel 1000 Independence Avenue, SW WashingtonDC 20585 202-287-6122 N/A Tanner, Stephanie N/A U.S. EPA WaterSense 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. MC 4204 WashingtonDC 20460202-564-2660 N/A Williamson, Jennifer L. Energy Engineer Technology Planning & Deployment Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) 902 Battelle Boulevard, P.O. Box 999 MSIN K6-05 Richland WA 99352 509-372-4168 509-372-4370
Date: 28 November 2023 **********************

NSN: 8950-01-487-1582 (CRP) * MONOGRAPH M9J1

 **********************

Item: Pepper, red, crushed, conventional, spice

Document: Packaging Requirements and Quality Assurance Provisions for CID A-A-20001 

Spices and Spice Blends 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 10 Component Classification: Ancillary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Red to dark red colored flakes with off-white to light yellow colored seeds.

Odor: Pungent.

Flavor: Red chili pepper and elicits a sensation of moderate to strong heat.

Texture: Free-flowing.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkened or clumped.

Odor: Musty or other objectionable odors.

Flavor: Musty or other objectionable flavors. Loss of identifying flavor.

Texture: Clumped (not free-flowing).

Unique Examination/Test Procedures: “Not free-flowing” may be defined as containing lumps that 

cannot be broken apart with light pressure.

Special Notes: N/A
No. 11-6487.

#### David Maxwell, Petitioner v. Eleanor L. Scarpino, et al.

565 U.S. 1065, 132 S. Ct. 767,

181 L. Ed. 2d 494,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8613.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Delegation of Authority No. 245-1]

                    By virtue of the authority vested in me as Secretary of State by the laws of the United States, including 22 U.S.C. 2651a, I hereby delegate to the Deputy Secretary and the Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources, to the extent authorized by law, all authorities and functions vested in the Secretary of State or the head of agency by any act, order, determination, delegation of authority, regulation, or executive order, now or hereafter issued.                          ( print page 8836)    

This Delegation includes all authorities and functions that have been or may be delegated or redelegated to other Department officials but does not repeal delegations to such officials.

Notwithstanding this delegation of authority, the Secretary of State may exercise any function or authority delegated by this delegation.

The Deputy Secretary or Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources may, to the extent consistent with law, (1) redelegate such functions and authorities and authorize their successive redelegation, and (2) promulgate such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out such functions.

This Delegation of Authority supersedes Delegation of Authority 245, dated April 23, 2001.

                    This memorandum shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: February 13, 2009.

Hillary Rodham Clinton,

Secretary of State, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-4142 Filed 2-25-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
No. 11-7427.

#### Carlos Moore, Petitioner v. Florida.

565 U.S. 1131, 132 S. Ct. 1050,

181 L. Ed. 2d 771,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 74,

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 70 So. 3d 587.
No. 11-7653.

#### Alan Suschanke, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1137, 132 S. Ct. 1067,

181 L. Ed. 2d 782,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 522.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 641 F.3d 968.
No. 11-7509.

#### Robert Duane Franklin, Petitioner v. M. Knowles, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 1180, 132 S. Ct. 1148,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1022,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 931.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 428 Fed. Appx. 777.
#### Peter Vamvaks and Constantine Limniatis, *Appellants,*v. James Pelekis, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed January 16th, 1926.

*Bart A. Riley*and *M. H. Rosenhouse,*for Appellants;

*Stapp, Vining <& Ward*and *M. 8. Bobst,*for Appellee..

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and'the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE>                                  5
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
           <S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,314
<SECURITIES>                                     2,575
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,022
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,074
<PP&E>                                           3,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,908
<BONDS>                                            244
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,536
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,236
<SALES>                                          2,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,415
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,688
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  35
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (820)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (820)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (820)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.39)



</TABLE>
*

The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of

Minnesota. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-3061

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of Minnesota.

*

Jesus Ivan Romero, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: November 15, 2005

Filed: November 22, 2005

___________

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

The Government charged Jesus Ivan Romero with a drug conspiracy and a

firearm offense. In a tentative plea agreement, Romero agreed to plead guilty to the

firearm charge and testify truthfully against other suspects in exchange for dismissal

of the conspiracy charge. After Romero refused to testify, however, the Government

withdrew the offer to drop the conspiracy charge. Concluding Romero did not fulfill

the plea offer’s conditions, the district court*

 rejected Romero’s motion for specific

enforcement. Without reserving his right to appeal the district court’s denial of his
-2-

motion to compel specific performance, Romero pleaded guilty to a different charge:

aiding and abetting a drug transaction. The district court sentenced Romero to 151

months in prison. 

On appeal, Romero claims he is entitled to specific performance of the

withdrawn plea offer, despite his refusal to accept its terms. Romero waived this

claim by his unconditional guilty plea to a different charge. United States v.

Arrellano, 213 F.3d 427, 430 (8th Cir. 2000) (guilty plea waives all nonjurisdictional

defenses). Even if the issue were appealable, the district court correctly ruled Romero

was not entitled to specific performance because he refused to agree to the offer’s

condition that he testify against other suspects. See United States v. Ayd, 25 F.3d

624, 626 (8th Cir. 1994) (government may withdraw offer when defendant cannot

perform conditions).

Romero also asserts the district court committed error in refusing to grant him

a minor role reduction. This assertion fails because Romero did not carry his burden

to prove he was entitled to the reduction. United States v. Johnson, 358 F.3d 1016,

1018 (8th Cir. 2004). Romero offered no evidence in support of the reduction and the

undisputed facts did not support the reduction. 

We thus affirm the district court.

______________________________
DAVID F. SHAYNE 

FAA OFFICE OF REGIONAL COUNSEL 

1601 LIND AVE., SW 

RENTON, WASHINGTON98057 

TELEPHONE: (425) 227-2165 

FACSIMILE: (425) 227-1007 

RECEIVED 

DEC 2 2 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of: 

Joseph D. Barbera FAA Case No. 2013NM090056 

FDMSDNo. FAA2013-1083 

Complainant's Motion to Affirm Dismissal 

Complainant hereby responds to the "Order of Referral" the ALJ issued on November 25, 

2014, in the above-captioned matter and moves that the ALJ's "Order Entering Default 

Judgment," entered on October 15, 2014, be affirmed. 

A. THE ALJ'S. ORDER SHOULD BE_AFFIRl\!JED AND THIS CASE DISMISSED 

Respondent's "Response to Order Entering Default Judgment" is not a Notice of Appeal 

and does not comport with the requirements of 14 C.F.R. Section 13.233. There is no matter 

properly before this tribunal for consideration. 

Assuming arguendo only that this tribunal has jurisdiction to enter a decision, the ALJ' s 

default judgment should be affirmed for the reasons stated therein. Additionally, his decision 

should be affirmed on the grounds that Respondent failed to file a timely Answer or because no 

genuine issue of material fact exists,. as argued in "Complainant's Reply to Respondent's 

Submissions" at;tq allofComplainant's earlierpleadings (hereby incorporated by reference). 

FAA v. Joseph D. Barbera: 

Complainant's Motion to Affinn Judgment 

FAA Case No. 2013NM090056 

Page 1 of3 

DAVID F. SHAYKE, FAA ATTORNEY 

TEL: (425) 227-2165; FAX: (425) 227-1007 
B. IF THE ALJ'S ORDER IS TO BE REVIEWED. THE ADMINISTRATOR SHOULD 

REQUIRE BRIEFING FROM THE PARTIES AND SET A BRIEFING SCHEDULE. 

In the event that this matter is accepted for appellate review, Respondent should be 

required to set forth his arguments, Complainant should have an opportunity to respond, and a 

briefing schedule should be established. 

Respectfully submitted this 16th day ofDecember, 2014. 

j 

DAVID F. SHAYNE 

FAA Attorney 

FAA v. Joseph D. Barbera. 

Complainant's Motion to Affinn Judgment 

FAA Case No. 2013NM090056 

Page2 of3 

DAVID F. SHA\?ffi, FAAATTORl'\"'EY 

TEL: (425) 227-2165; FAX: (425) 227-1007 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certifY that the foregoing Complainant's Motion to Affirm Judgment has been served as 

designated by the recipient's name this date, to the following: 

Federal Aviation Administration-Facsimile and First Class Mail 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2Wl 000 

800 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Fax: (202) 493-5142 

Joseph D Barbera- First Class and Return Receipt Requested Mail 

14 706 NE Erickson Dr. 

La Center, WA 98629-4405 

Dated this 16th day of December 2014. 

cah/?c-e Tern Kirk 

FAA v. Joseph D. Barbera. 

Complainant's Motion toAffinn Judgment 

FAA Case No. 2013NM090056 

Page 3 of3 

Office ofRegional Counsel (ANM-7) 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Ave. SW 

Renton, WA 98057 

(425) 227-2007 

DAVID F. SHAYJ',E, FAA ATTOR!\"EY 

TEL: (425) 227-2165; FAX: (425) 227-1007
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4737 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4737

  To provide additional funding for State health insurance counseling 
                programs for Medicare part D enrollment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2006

  Mr. Thompson of California (for himself, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Stark, Mr. 
 Brown of Ohio, Mr. Waxman, Mr. Levin, Mr. Cardin, Mr. McDermott, Mr. 
     Lewis of Georgia, Mr. Neal of Massachusetts, Mr. McNulty, Mr. 
  Jefferson, Mr. Tanner, Mr. Becerra, Mr. Doggett, Mr. Pomeroy, Mrs. 
 Jones of Ohio, Mr. Larson of Connecticut, Mr. Emanuel, Mr. Taylor of 
   Mississippi, Mr. Case, Mr. Abercrombie, Mr. Moore of Kansas, Mr. 
  Cardoza, Mr. Boswell, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. McGovern, Mrs. Tauscher, Mr. 
Cooper, Mr. Melancon, Mr. Schiff, Ms. Herseth, Mr. Boyd, Mr. Bishop of 
    Georgia, Mr. Barrow, Mr. Berry, and Mr. Salazar) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations, 
  and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means and Energy and 
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide additional funding for State health insurance counseling 
                programs for Medicare part D enrollment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASED FUNDING FOR STATE HEALTH INSURANCE COUNSELING 
              PROGRAMS FOR MEDICARE PART D ENROLLMENT.

    (a) In General.--In addition to any amounts otherwise appropriated, 
there are appropriated out of any funds in the Treasury not otherwise 
appropriated $100,000,000 for fiscal year 2006 to the Secretary of 
Health and Human Services for grants to States under section 4360 of 
the Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1990 for the purpose of providing 
outreach and information counseling and assistance with respect to 
enrollment of part D eligible individuals (as defined in section 1860D-
1(a)(3) of the Social Security Act) under prescription drug plans and 
MA-PD plans under title XVIII of the Social Security Act. Funds 
appropriated under the preceding sentence shall remain available until 
expended.
    (b) Offset.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the amount 
of funds available for obligation under section 1858(e)(2)(A)(i) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-27a(e)(2)(A)(i)) are hereby 
reduced by the amount of funds appropriated under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION 

TITLE: PARTS MANAGEMENT PLAN 

Number: DI-SDMP-81748 Approval Date: 20071015 

AMSC Number: D7324 Limitation: 

DTIC Applicable: GIDEP Applicable: 

Preparing Activity: OSD-SO 

Applicable Forms: 

Use/Relationship: This Data Item Description contains the format and content preparation 

instructions for data resulting from the work task described in the solicitation. 

This Data Item Description supersedes DI-MISC-80526. 

Requirements: 

1. Reference Documents. The applicable issue of the documents cited herein, including their 

approval dates, and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions shall be as 

specified in the contract. 

2. Format. The plan shall be in contractor’s format. 

3. Content. The plan shall detail the contractor’s parts management program. It shall include 

provisions for optimizing part reliability and standardization through all phases of the system, 

subsystem or equipment life cycle. In addition, it shall include the areas or subjects as identified 

in MIL-STD-3018, Parts Management, Requirement 5.1 (parts management elements). 

4. Parts List. The parts list, if required by contract, shall contain the following information: 

a. Vendor part number with no wildcards. 

b. CAGE code of the manufacturer. 

END OF DI-SDMP-81748 

Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2017-03-27T17:56Z

Check the source to verify that this is the current version before use.
28 September 2007 *************************

NSN: 8955-01-556-0077 * MONOGRAPH NO: 6B2 

 ************************* 

Item: Drink Mixes, Coffee Flavored, instant, Cappuccino, Regular, Irish Cream (Type V, Style 

A, Flavor 4) (CIC) 

Document: CID A-A-20336, Drink Mixes, Coffee (Unflavored and Flavored) and PKG&QAP 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 120 Component Classification: Secondary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F 

Item Characteristics

Appearance: 

Dehydrated product: a pale tan or dark brown combination. 

Rehydrated product: a medium cream brown color with a layer of milky white froth on 

top. 

Odor: 

Dehydrated product: Characteristic of Irish Cream instant cappuccino. 

Rehydrated product: Strong, sweetened coffee with cream characteristic of Irish 

Cream. 

Flavor: Rehydrated product: A strong sweetened coffee with cream flavor characteristic of 

Irish Cream. 

Texture: 

Dehydrated product: Free flowing and fine grained. Lumps that occur can be broken 

apart with light finger pressure. 

Rehydrated product: smooth, free of discernible lumps, and sediment free. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: 

Dehydrated product: Lumpy or caked, not free flowing. Not uniformly blended. Not 

pale tan or not a dark brown combination. 

Rehydrated product: May not reconstitute instantly, sedimentation, undissolved 

particles. 

Odor: Off odors, such as, strong non-fat dry milk odor, rancid aroma. 

Flavor: Rehydrated product: Flavor not typical of Irish Cream coffee flavor. Off flavors, such 

as, strong non-fat dry milk flavor, rancid. 

Texture: 

Dehydrated product: Not free flowing. Lumps that occur can not be broken apart with 

light finger pressure. 

Rehydrated product: Not sediment free. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Initial examination should be done in the dry state; final examination and evaluation should be done 

after rehydrating IAW package instructions. After adding water gentle stirring is permitted. 

Special Notes Dry product may contain lumps, which are of no concern provided they break or fall 

apart under light finger pressure.