alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE ATJXBECNEY GENERAL 

OPTEXAS 

February 1, 1967 

Honorable John C. Mullen Opinion No. M-19 

County Attorney 

Jim Wells County Re: Whether a person who has been 

Alice, Texas convicted of a felony, wherein 

the sentence was suspended, and 

the judgment of conviction has 

not been set aside and the cause 

dismissed under the provisions 

of Article 780 of the old Code 

of Criminal Procedure, is barred from applying for and receiving probation under the 

Misdemeanor Probation Law. 

Dear Mr. Mullen: Article 42.13, V.C.C.P. 

You have requested this office for an opinion on the 

hereinabove set out question. 

Article 42.13, Vernon's Code of Criminal Procedure, 

known as the Misdemeanor Probation Law, provides, among 

other conditions, in Section 3(a)(2) thereof, that a defendant who has been found guilty of a misdemeanor wherein 

the maximum oermissible punishment is by confinement in jail 

or by a fine in excess of $200, may be 'granted probation if: 

"He has never before been convicted in this or another jurisdiction of a felony or of a misdemeanor for which the maximum permissible punishment is by confinement in jail or exceeds a $200 fine." 

It has been held that the expression "conviction of 

a felony", as used in the suspended sentence law, means that 

status resulting from a judgment based on a verdict finding 

the accused guilty, and hence includes a conviction where 

sentence has been suspended. Hill v. State, 243 S.W. 982 

fTex.Crim. 1922); Bradshaw v. State, 81 S g.2d 83 (Tex.Crim. 

State, llo s w 26 711 (Tex.Crim. 1938). 

eS.W.2d l&'(Te~,f.?;~m. 1933); Thompion 

-m'?A R¶Q /WC.., Ir,im 

i935); Edwards 

Whitlock v. Sta, 

V. State, 244 L?' .W.LU "J.7. (IT*."AYu. d.2>=,. 

Therefore, in view of the above authorities and under 

the facts stated, it is the opinion of this office that a 

person who has been convicted of a felony wherein the sentence was suspended is barred thereby from applying for and 

- 76 - 
Honorable John C. Mullen, Page 2 (M-19) 

receivin probation under the Misdemeanor Probation Law. 

Article $ 2.13, V.C.C.P. 

SUMMARY 

A person who has been convicted of a 

felony, wherein the sentence was suspended, and the judgment of conviction 

has not been set aside and the cause 

dismissed under the provisions of Article 780 of the old Code of Criminal 

Procedure, is barred from applying for 

and receiving probation under the Misdemeanor Probation Law. Article 42.13, 

V.C.C.P. 

Y*s very truly, 

WAt rney General of Texas 

RLL/dt 

Prepared by R. L. Lattimore 

Assistant Attorney General 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE: 

Hawthorne Phillips, Chairman 

W. V. Geppert, Co-chairman 

Sam Kelley 

John Banks 

Bill Craig 

David Longoria 

A. J. Carubbi, Jr. 

Staff Legal Assistant 

- 77 -
Montana Eleventh Judicial District Court. County of Flathead.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- ARISTA MARIE ANDERSON, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-12-195

Done in open Court this 8th day of April, 2016.

DATED this 3rd day of May, 2016.

DECISION

On November 19, 2015, the Defendant’s deferred sentence was revoked for violations of conditions and she was sentenced to the Department of Corrections for a commitment of two (2) years to run concurrent to DC-12-033 and consecutive to DC-12-203, with recommended placement on ISP. The Court ordered that the Defendant be required to comply with all requirements imposed by the Court’s Judgment of June 6, 2013, as conditions of probation. The Defendant was given credit for seventy-three (73) days served in custody pending final disposition in this matter. Defendant was not to receive credit for time otherwise served on probation.

On April 8, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Peter Ohman, of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member and Hon. Brad Newman, Member.
No. 11-7573.

#### Greta Crawford, Petitioner v. United States, et al.

565 U.S. 1135, 132 S. Ct. 1061,

181 L. Ed. 2d 778,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 88.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 433.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 8503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4029]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments

    Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and 
Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651, as amended 
by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments 
on the question of whether instruments of equivalent scientific value, 
for the purposes for which the instruments shown below are intended to 
be used, are being manufactured in the United States.
    Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the 
regulations and be postmarked on or before March 17, 2009. Address 
written comments to Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room 3720, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230. Applications may be 
examined between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. at the U.S. Department of 
Commerce in Room 3720.
    Docket Number: 09-001. Applicant: Childrens Hospital, 4650 Sunset 
Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90027. Instrument: Transmission Electron 
Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: 
The instrument will be used for the study of ultrastructural changes in 
human and animal tissue and tissue culture samples in various disease 
processes and experimental conditions. Justification for Duty-Free 
Entry: Instrument is not manufactured by any company in the United 
States. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: January 30, 
2009.
    Docket Number: 09-002. Applicant: U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, Acquisition Management Unit, TMS, R8, 1595 Winkoop Street, 
Denver, CO 80202. Instrument: Transmission Electron Microscope. 
Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: The instrument will be 
used for qualitative and quantitative analysis of asbestos in air, 
dust, soil, water and biological sample matrices. Justification for 
Duty-Free Entry: No instruments available domestically with the 
capabilities required for the intended use. Application accepted by 
Commissioner of Customs: February 5, 2009.
    Docket Number: 09-003. Applicant: U.S. Food and Drug 
Administration, Center for Food Safety & Applied Nutrition, 8301 
MuirKirk Road, Laurel, MD 20708. Instrument: Transmission Electron 
Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: The 
instrument will be used for evaluation of biological specimens for the 
expression of microbial structures important in the causation of 
disease. Justification for Duty-Free Entry: No domestic suppliers of 
transmission electron microscopes. Application accepted by Commissioner 
of Customs: February 5, 2009.

    Dated: February 20, 2009.
Chris Cassel,
Acting Director, IA Subsidies Enforcement Office.
 [FR Doc. E9-4029 Filed 2-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 4275]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1962]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases 
Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting.

    Name of SEP: SBIR Fast Track Initiative (teleconference).
    Date: February 3, 1998.
    Time: 9:00 a.m.-adjournment.
    Place: Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Room 5AS25U, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20892.
    Contact Person: Tommy L. Broadwater, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Rm 5AS25U, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892, Telephone: 301-594-4953.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate and review contract application.
    This meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. The 
discussion of this application could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
application, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This meeting is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. [93.846, 
Project Grants in Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Disease 
Research], National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 22, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-1962 Filed 1-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
No. 11-686.

#### Juan Delgado, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1115, 132 S. Ct. 1066,

181 L. Ed. 2d 741,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 384.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

*742Same case below, 653 F.3d 729.
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $8.39 CWT 0.965 $8.0964

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.5634 LB 3.5 $8.9719

Class I Price $17.0683

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $7.82 CWT 0.965 $7.5463

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.5355 LB 3.5 $8.8743

Class I Price $16.4206

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.6477

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0557

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0278

Price change per quart $0.0139

Price change per pint $0.0070

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0050

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0042

Price change per half pint $0.0035

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.06

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.03

Price adjustment per quart $0.01

Price adjustment per pint $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: June 2, 2019
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

WARREN TARVER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1872

[July 5, 2018]

CORRECTED OPINION

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Timothy L. Bailey, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 95-12342-CF-10A.

Warren Tarver, South Bay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the periodic report of CelLynx Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kevin Pickard, Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the
date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of
the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.





Date:
      February 19, 2010
            
            /s/
      Kevin PickardKevin
      Pickard, Consultant providing services
              commonly
      provided by a chief financial officer
              (Principal
      Financial Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 35.5



|     |  |                                                                                                           |  | 
|---- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1050-084, 8th Fl
401 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334 |  | 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2017, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, LLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2017-C39 (the
Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant
to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from August 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period
has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of
February 2018.



|                        
|------------------------
|LOGO                    
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        

|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
EXHIBIT 10.29.1





PROMISSORY NOTE











$
20,841,730.11

January 7, 2010














Mission West Properties, L.P., Mission West Properties, L.P. I, Mission West Properties, L.P. II, and Mission West Properties, L.P. III (collectively referred to herein as “Mission”)





promises to pay to
The Berg Group





the principal sum of Twenty Million Eight Hundred Forty One Thousand Seven Hundred Thirty Dollars and 11 Cents ($20,841,730.11),





plus interest at the rate of 30 day LIBOR plus 1.75 percent per annum (compounded on the basis of a 366-day year) beginning on the 7th day of January, 2010.





Should interest not so be paid, it shall thereafter bear like interest as the principal, but such unpaid interest so compounded shall not exceed an amount equal to simple interest on the unpaid principal at the maximum rate permitted by law. Should default be made in the payment of any installment of interest when due, the whole sum of principal and interest shall become immediately due and payable at the option of the holder of this note.  Should suit be commenced or an attorney employed to enforce the payment of this note, we agree to pay such additional sum as the court may adjudge as reasonable attorney’s fees in said suit. Principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States.





Principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States no later than March 31, 2010.  Notwithstanding the above, Mission shall use its best efforts to repay the loan as soon as possible using all available sources of cash, including but not limited to cash generated from operations and cash available from any other financing sources.








Signed By:
/s/ Raymond V. Marino

1/7/10Raymond V. Marino, Pres. & COO

DateMission West Properties, Inc.Its General Partner





Acknowledged:
/s/ Carl E. Berg

1/7/10Carl E. Berg

Date
Inspection Criteria for Government Owned MRE Cheese Spread

28 April 2008

IMAGE OF NEW CHEESE SPREAD

Three Flavors
        - Currently MRE cheese spread comes in three flavors Cheddar, Jalapeno, and Bacon).
        - In appearance, they will be the same except for discernible small pieces of Jalapeno or Bacon which should be present

Typical Defects, Curdling and Oiliness
        - Knead before opening
        - Curdled appearance and Oiliness are common defects.  They are made more severe by heat stress, but may be present in new product.
        - These defects will normally be assessed as minor defects

This product is oily, but has smooth texture and good color.  This would be a minor defect. 

The degree of darkening in the picture can be assessed as a MAJ B defect.  If the sample had better color it would be assessed as a minor defect for curdled appearance.

The picture represented by 120F for 3 months would be Minor Defect.  The color represented by 120F for 6 months (and darker) would be assessed as a Major Defect.  

Inspection Report
        - Defects of color normally take precedence over defects of curdling or oiliness with this product.
        - Since we only put one defect per component, note the color.  The inspector may make a note of curdling or oiliness in the “remarks section”, to show that both color and texture were less than satisfactory.
        - The three types of cheese spread are different items, but for the purpose of determining serviceability of the assembled ration, consider all flavors of cheese spread to be one component, if they exhibit a common finding such as darkening.
Navy Clothing & Textile Update

Deputy Commander, Navy Uniforms

Navy Exchange Service Command

CAPT John D. Cassani

6 Nov 2019

Unclassified
DLA

Govt Issue 

Uniforms

OPNAV N1/N13

Uniform Matters 

Office (UMO)

Sea Bag / Optional Uniforms

POLICY and 

REQUIREMENTS

Chief of Naval 

Operations

MATERIAL MGT, 

PROCUREMENT, 

& SUSTAINMENT

TECHNICAL, 

DESIGN, & 

DEVELOPMENT

NEX

Commercial

Uniforms

FLEET and 

Type 

Commanders

Organizational Clothing / Protective Gear

NAVSEA

Ship/Sub

NAVAIR

Aviation

NAVFAC

Expeditionary

NAVSUP/

NEXCOM

NCTRF

General

NAVSUP/

NEXCOM

NCTRF

DLA

Direct 

Procurement by 

Navy Units

Navy Clothing Organization
Projects in 

Development Projects in Execution

Navy Uniform Projects

Projects in Development

NCTRF / Vibram to 

develop sole 

Redesign Black 

Safety Boot (I-5)

Projects 

in 

Execution

Gov’t Issue PT Shoe

NEX Glakes Ditty Bag and

NEX Newport OCS issue. 

NSI Item 

NCTRF / UMO 

evaluating 

alternative fabrics 

White Hat

Cold Weather 

Parka (mods)

SWO G-1 Leather 

Jacket

Maritime 2-Piece

FR Variant

Seabag (TBD)

Improved PTU

Wear Test in Progress

Limited Wear Test In 

Progress 

NWU T-III FR

With modifications

Submarine Sweater

Lined Variant

Female Size 

Standardization
OPNAV

Mr. Rob Carroll, N13X Uniform Matters robert.b.carroll@navy.mil

NAVSUP/NEXCOM

CAPT John Cassani, Deputy Commander, Navy Uniform Programs John.Cassani@nexweb.org 

Ms. Laurra Winters, Director, Navy Clothing & Textiles Research Facility laurra.c.winters.civ@mail.mil

Mr. Mark Stephens, Director, Uniform Product Management Group Mark.Stephens@nexweb.org

Mr. Paul Shields, Director, Uniform Program Management Office Paul.Shields@nexweb.org

NAVSEA

Mr. Edward Gray, Technical Warrant Holder Body Armor edward.gray1@navy.mil

Mr. David Gwaltney, APM Assistant Program Manager david.gwaltney@navy.mil

NAVAIR

Ms. Tara Capecci, Lead Textile Engineer tara.capecci@navy.mil

NAVFAC/NEPO

Mr. Vince Oliveira, Expeditionary Programs Office (ExPO) vincent.g.oliveira.ctr@navy.mil

Navy Points of Contact