alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ICG 2012 Performance Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 

 
 ICG 2012 Performance Plan 

The Board of Directors of ICG Group, Inc. (together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, “ICG”) hereby establishes this 2012 Performance Plan
(this “Plan”). The purposes of this Plan are to (1) advance the interests of ICG’s stockholders by providing certain officers and other employees with bonus payments upon the achievement of specified corporate and individual
goals and (2) help ICG attract and retain key employees. 
 The Compensation Committee of ICG’s Board of Directors (the
“Committee”) will administer and interpret this Plan. All decisions and determinations of the Committee with respect to this Plan will be final and binding on all parties. 
 ICG’s 2012 goals include quantitative and qualitative goals. The relative weighting of each element of the ICG-specific goals is described below. 

Eighty percent (80%) of the bonus potential related to ICG’s goals is tied to the accomplishment of quantitative goals. The realization of
specified aggregate revenue goals for ICG’s existing consolidated core companies (GovDelivery, InvestorForce and Procurian) accounts for twenty percent (20%) of the potential bonus award, and the achievement of specified aggregate EBITDA
performance goals for these companies accounts for twenty percent (20%) of the potential bonus award. The realization of specified revenue and EBITDA performance goals for other ICG companies (Channel Intelligence, Freeborders, Seapass/Bolt and
WhiteFence) accounts for twenty percent (20%) of the potential bonus award. Twenty percent (20%) of the potential bonus award relates to the deployment by ICG and/or its consolidated core companies of an aggregate of seventy-five million
dollars ($75 million) in cash and/or securities towards (1) ICG’s acquisition of new and/or additional ownership interests in one or more consolidated core companies and/or (2) the acquisition of one or more new companies by one or
more consolidated core companies. 
 Twenty percent (20%) of the bonus is tied to execution against the following qualitative goals:
(1) execution of strategic initiatives, (2) improvement in communicating the value of ICG’s underlying assets, (3) enhancement of the ICG brand, (4) development of ICG’s acquisition pipeline, (5) performance and
competency of the executives of ICG’s companies and (6) reaction to unforeseen market/business conditions. 
 Following the end of the
2012 fiscal year, the Committee will evaluate ICG’s 2012 performance and determine the extent to which the corporate and individual goals were achieved. Based upon this assessment, the Committee will award bonuses in accordance with the terms
of this Plan.
No. 11-7396.

#### Shawn Green, Petitioner v. Brian Fischer, Commissioner, New York Department of Correctional Services.

565 U.S. 1130, 132 S. Ct. 1047,

181 L. Ed. 2d 769,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 94.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judicial Department, denied.

Same case below, 77 App. Div. 3d 1011, 908 N.Y.S.2d 757.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4745 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2006 

Received 

AN ACT 

Making supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 2006 for 

the Small Business Administration’s disaster loans program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the following sums are appropriated, out of any 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

HR 4745 RDS 

1 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for fis2 cal year 2006: 

3 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

4 DISASTER LOANS PROGRAMACCOUNT

5 (INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)

6 For an additional amount for ‘‘Disaster Loans Pro7 gram Account’’ for the cost of direct loans authorized by 

8 section 7(b) of the Small Business Act, $712,000,000, to 

9 remain available until expended: Provided, That such 

10 costs, including the cost of modifying such loans, shall be 

11 as defined in section 502 of the Congressional Budget Act 

12 of 1974: Provided further, That the amount provided 

13 under this heading is hereby derived by transfer from the 

14 amount provided for ‘‘Disaster Relief’’ in Public Law 109– 

15 62: Provided further, That the amount provided under this 

16 heading is designated as an emergency requirement pursu17 ant to section 402 of H. Con. Res. 95 (109th Congress), 

18 the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 

19 2006. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 15, 

2006. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
No. 09-8065.

#### Eddie Wayne Davis, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

559 U.S. 949, 130 S. Ct. 1530,

176 L. Ed. 2d 129,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1148.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7615

JEROME ALEXANDER RIDDICK,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN OF BRUNSWICK CORRECTIONAL CENTER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-325-AM)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 18, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Alexander Riddick, Appellant Pro Se. Marla Graff Decker,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

October 9, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on October 13, 1998. Pursuant to Rules

58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the

date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as

the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Alexander Riddick appeals the district court’s order

granting Respondent’s motion to dismiss and denying relief on his

petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny his motions for an

evidentiary hearing, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See Riddick v. Warden

of Brunswick Correctional Ctr., No. CA-98-325-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 13,

1998).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4742 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 Union Calendar No. 223
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4742

                          [Report No. 109-408]

  To amend title 35, United States Code, to allow the Director of the 
  Patent and Trademark Office to waive statutory provisions governing 
             patents and trademarks in certain emergencies.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2006

    Mr. Smith of Texas (for himself, Mr. Berman, and Mr. Goodlatte) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

                             April 5, 2006

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
  To amend title 35, United States Code, to allow the Director of the 
  Patent and Trademark Office to waive statutory provisions governing 
             patents and trademarks in certain emergencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF PATENT AND TRADEMARK REQUIREMENTS IN CERTAIN 
              EMERGENCIES.

    Section 2 of title 35, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Waiver of Requirements in Certain Emergencies.--The Director 
may waive statutory provisions governing the filing, processing, 
renewal, and maintenance of patents, trademark registrations, and 
applications therefor to the extent the Director deems necessary in 
order to protect the rights and privileges of applicants and other 
persons affected by an emergency or a major disaster, as those terms 
are defined in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 
and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122). A decision not to 
exercise, or a failure to exercise, the waiver authority provided by 
this subsection shall not be subject to judicial review.''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 223

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4742

                          [Report No. 109-408]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To amend title 35, United States Code, to allow the Director of the 
  Patent and Trademark Office to waive statutory provisions governing 
             patents and trademarks in certain emergencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 5, 2006

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed`
DLA TROOP SUPPORT SUBSISTENCE INSPECTION MANNUAL 4155.6 

 SUBSECTION 101.2 

 DLA TROOP SUPPORT-FTRE 

 SEPTEMBER 2011 

DLA TROOP SUPPORT 4155.6 

SUBSECTION 101.2 

KEY PERSONNEL ROSTER 

I. DLA Troop Support 

 700 Robbins Avenue 

 Philadelphia, PA 19111 

Telephone Numbers. The Defense Switched Network (DSN) number for DSCP is 

prefixed by "444" followed by the four digit extension. The commercial number is 

prefixed by "215-737" followed by the four digit extension. After duty hours, incoming 

calls are received by the Staff Duty Officer (SDO), DSN 444-2341, commercial number 

1-800-441-1837. 

 A. FOOD SAFETY OFFICE (DLA TROOP SUPPORT-FTW) EXTENSION 

 Chief: 8461 

 Deputy Chief: 4355 

 CONSUMER SAFETY OFFICER/U.S. ARMY VETERINARY 

 SANITARY APPROVAL 

 POC 2922 

B. BUSINESS SUPPORT OFFICE, STANDARDIZATION (DLA TROOP 

 SUPPORT-FTSA)

 Chief: 8341 

 POC (Food Technologist/Dietician) 4256 

 POC (Food Technologist) 7769 

 POC (Food Technologist) 2961 

 QUALITY AUDIT AND FOOD DEFENSE BRANCH (DLA TROOP 

 SUPPORT-FTSB)

 Chief: 8656 

 

 QUALITY SYSTEMS AUDIT

 POC 3876 

 POC 4209 

 POC 5353 
 

 PRODUCT QUALITY AUDIT

 POC 3299 

 POC 8523 

 POC 5353 

 POC 4259 

 OPERATIONAL RATIONS AND EQUIPMENT BRANCH (DLA 

 TROOP SUPPORT-FTRE)

 Chief: 3822 

 POC 4229 

 POC 0833 

 POC 8342 

 POC (Food Technologist) 7771 

 GROUP FIELD FEEDING

 POC 7802 

 

 INDIVIDUAL FIELD FEEDING

 POC 4477 

 POC 7773 

 POC 8030 

 POC (Food Technologist) 7771 

 EQUIPMENT 

 POC 2370 

 C. PRODUCE COMMODITY BUSINESS UNIT (DLA TROOP 

 SUPPORT-HP)

 Points of contact are DSO/PBO supported. 

 D. DLA TROOP SUPPORT - PACIFIC REGION

 440 Fuller Way COMM (808) 474-2903 

 Building 280 

 Pearl Harbor, HI 96860-4967 
E. DLA TROOP SUPPORT–EUROPE & AFRICA REGION 

 

Kleber Kaserne, Building 3229 

Mannheimerstrasse 218/219 DSN 483-5409 

67657 Kaiserslautern COMM 49-631-411-5409 

Germany 

Defense Logistics Agency, Troop Support Europe&Africa DSN 483-5410 

Unit 23152 COMM 49-631-411-5410 

APO AE 09227 

 

Quality Assurance Specialist DSN 483-5412 

 COMM 49-631-411-5412 

 

 Quality Assurance Specialist DSN 483-5414 

 COMM 49-631-411-5414
No. 10-10876.

#### Christopher B. Thompson, Petitioner v. Mike Dittman, Warden.

565 U.S. 1101, 132 S. Ct. 868,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8959.

181 L. Ed. 2d 565,

December 12, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 854, 132 S. Ct. 184, 181 L. Ed. 2d 93, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6426.
Exhibit 10.7



 EXHIBIT 10.7: Base Salaries of Named Executive Officers 

Effective March 1, 2012, the following are the base salaries (on an annual basis) of the named executive officers* (as defined in
Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K) of Alliance Bankshares Corporation. 
  

					
	 William E. Doyle, Jr.
	  	$	299,500	  
	 President & Chief Executive Officer
	  
		
	 Jean S. Houpert**
	  	$	185,000	  
	 Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
	  
		
	 George F. Cave
	  	$	220,000	  
	 Executive Vice President
	  
		
	 Craig W. Sacknoff
	  	$	181,600	  
	 Executive Vice President
	  

  
  

	*	Salary information is not presented for Paul M. Harbolick, Jr. because he is no longer an employee. 


	**	Jean S. Houpert is expected to become a named executive officer with the 2012 Proxy Statement. 


  
 128
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:           April 28, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Mitchell E. Hersh                                     |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                  |   | Mitchell E. Hersh                                         |
|                                                                                  |   | President and Chief Executive Officer                     |
|                                                                                  |   |   of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation,              |
|                                                                                  |   |   the general partner of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. |
|                                                                                  |   |                                                      |
|                                                                                  |   |                                                      |
| Date:           April 28, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Barry Lefkowitz                                       |   |
|                                                                                  |   | Barry Lefkowitz                                           |
|                                                                                  |   | Executive Vice President and                              |
|                                                                                  |   |   Chief Financial Officer                       |
|                                                                                  |   |   of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation,              |
|                                                                                  |   |   the general partner of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. |

----
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-3 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a
duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2017, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables
LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-3 and Wilmington Trust, National Association (the “Agreement”) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my
supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period
that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.
| | ---------------------------
| |                            
| | By:                        
| | Name:                      
| | Title:                     
| | Date:                      
| |                            
| | By:                        
| | Name:                      
| | Title:                     
| | Date:
No. 09-8493.

#### Michael Wayne Goldston, Jr., Petitioner v. North Carolina.

559 U.S. 982, 130 S. Ct. 1711,

176 L. Ed. 2d 197,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2041.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeals of North Carolina denied.

Same case below, 194 N.C. App. 373, 671 S.E.2d 595.
VIA EMAIL Bryon Wolff UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENC Y WASHINGTON , D

. C: 20460



## JUL 2 3 

## 2014
CTO, Polymer Specialties International Ltd. 175 Deerfield Road, Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 2L8 Dear Mr. Wolff: OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

Th is letter serves as a respon se to your May 20, 2014 request to add the Gas Stop Black TIF Barrier Film, 1.1 mi l thickness, to the EPA soil fumigant tarp credit website. The EPA has reviewed the laboratory tarp testing data for the Gas Stop Black TIF Barrier film (MRID 49390201) s ubmitted by Ajwa Laboratory on behalf of EcoPoly Solutions LTD. Based on the calculated mass transfer coefficients (MTCs) and the corresponding cut points determined by EPA as a basis for assigning buffer zone credits (DP Barcode 385314. Dawson, Smith and She lat
. "Second Update to Health Effects Division Recommendations for Good Agricultural Practices and Associated Buffer Credit s. " January 11 , 2011), the tarp qualifies for the following buffer zone reduction credits: 60% for methyl bromide , 40% for chloropicrin, 40% chloropicrin and 1 ,3 -dichloropropene, and 20% for metam sodium or metam potass ium. Thi s tarp is also approved with use of dimethyl disulfide. The tarp will be li sted on the following EPA websites, http: //www.epa.gov/ pesticides/tarpcredits/ and http: //www.epa.gov /oppsrrdl /reregistration/soi l fumigants/dmds-tarps/ , as "Gas Stop Black TIF Barrier Film, 2: 1.1 mil." Please see the enclosure for the EPA ' s review ofthe laboratory studies. Please contact me at (703) 308-2961 or at schroeder.carolyn @ epa.gov if you have any questions.

Carolyn Sc reeder Chemical Review Manager Risk Management & Implementation Branch IV Pesticide Re-evaluation Division

Enclosures: DP Barcode 420375. Health Effects Division. " Classification ofTarp Permeabilit y Data Based on ASTM M ethod E2945-14 for Gas Stop Black TIF Barrier Film By Ecopoly Solutions, Inc. " July 23, 2014.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED NICO LE ASHLEY MUINA , App ellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 21

- 2696 LT Case No. 2021

- MM

- 000133

- A STATE O F FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed May 10, 2022 Appeal from t he C ounty C ourt for Citrus County , Mark J. Yerman , J udge. Matthew J. Me tz , P ublic D efender, a nd Betty W yatt, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona B each, for

A ppellant. Ashley M oody, A ttorney G eneral, Tallahassee, an d Whitney B rown Hartless, Assistant A ttorney G eneral, Daytona B each, for

A ppellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, HARRIS and NARDELLA , JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4720 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 4720

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2006

                                Received

                           November 13, 2006

   Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 
                          Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 200 Gateway Drive in Lincoln, California, as the ``Beverly J. Wilson 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BEVERLY J. WILSON POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 200 Gateway Drive in Lincoln, California, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Beverly J. Wilson Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Beverly J. 
Wilson Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. 09-6742.

#### Brian Lee Gould, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 974, 130 S. Ct. 1686,

176 L. Ed. 2d 186,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2014.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 568 F.3d 459.
EXHIBIT 10(A)



 EXHIBIT 10(a) 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statements of Additional
Information and to the use of our reports: (1) dated April 13, 2012, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Life Insurance Company, and (2) dated April 16, 2012, with respect to the
financial statements of the subaccounts of Separate Account VA W, included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 16 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-116562) under the Securities Act of 1933 and related Prospectuses of Flexible
Premium Variable Annuity – G and Members Liberty Variable Annuity. 
  

	
	/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


 Des Moines, Iowa 
 April 16, 2012