alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Timothy J. Dodd, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dakota Growers PastaCompany, Inc.;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  June 14, 2005 |
|--------------------------------|
|                           | /s/ Timothy J. Dodd |   |
|                           |   |   |
|                           | Timothy J. Dodd |
|                           | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED J EFFREY CLAYTON BONNEY , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 21

- 2189 LT Case No. 2019

- CF

- 1146 STATE O F FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed October 11, 2022 Appeal from t he C ircuit C ourt for C itrus County , Richard A

. H oward, J udge. J. Michael Blackstone, o f J

. M ichael Blackstone, P .A. , C rystal River, f or Appellant. Ashley M oody, A ttorney G eneral, Tallahassee, Deborah A

. C hance and Pamela J. Koller, A ssistant Attorney G eneral s, Daytona B each, for A ppellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. EVANDER , WALLIS and HARRIS , JJ. , concur.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 15-14632

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 4:15-cr-00003-RH-CAS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

ROBERT W. MCCANDLESS, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

________________________

(March 25, 2016)

Before HULL, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 15-14632 Date Filed: 03/25/2016 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Darren Johnson, appointed counsel for Robert McCandless in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 

1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record 

reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. 

Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of 

merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and McCandless’s convictions 

and sentences are AFFIRMED. 

Case: 15-14632 Date Filed: 03/25/2016 Page: 2 of 2
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 13, 2021

NO. 03

- 20

- 00515

- CV

Eric Leonard Tucker , Appellant

v.

Natalia Citalli Covarrubias Campos , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JU STIC ES GOODWIN, TRIANA, AND KELLY

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l c ourt on September 28, 2020

. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s order

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s order

. The appellant shall

pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
No. 09-8801.

#### Alberto Quiroz-Mendez, aka Mario Garcia-Moreno, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 986, 130 S. Ct. 1724,

176 L. Ed. 2d 204,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1945.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 334 Fed. Appx. 853.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         551,369
<SECURITIES>                                   157,580
<RECEIVABLES>                                  460,847
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,289,422
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,562,613
<PP&E>                                         294,835
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,348
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,478,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,206,825
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,062
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,267,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,478,183
<SALES>                                      5,244,909
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,667,842
<CGS>                                        4,202,851
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,202,851
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,903,801
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              44,921
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (433,629)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (433,629)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (433,629)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED AUGUST 28, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000034408
<NAME> FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-28-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      95,301,411
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                568,780,481
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           719,954,884
<PP&E>                                     563,965,732
<DEPRECIATION>                             192,824,434
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,095,251,636
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      378,546,462
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    18,310,933
<OTHER-SE>                                 672,340,125
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,095,251,636
<SALES>                                  2,751,181,355
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         2,751,181,355
<CGS>                                    1,833,441,611
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            2,528,502,088
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            222,679,267
<INCOME-TAX>                                82,600,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        140,079,267
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               140,079,267
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .81


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4468]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments

Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and Cultural 
Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by Pub. 
L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the 
question of whether instruments of equivalent scientific value, for the 
purposes for which the instruments shown below are intended to be used, 
are being manufactured in the United States.
Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations 
and be postmarked on or before March 23, 2009. Address written comments 
to Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room 3720, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230. Applications may be examined between 
8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. at the U.S. Department of Commerce in Room 
3720.
Docket Number: 08-061. Applicant: California Association for Research 
in Astronomy dba W.M. Keck Observatory, 65-1120 Mamalahoa Highway, 
Kamuela, HI 96743. Instrument: Laser Launch Telescope Assembly (LTA). 
Manufacturer: Galileo Avionica, Italy. Intended Use: The LTA will be 
used as part of a Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics System, which will 
measure and correct for the turbulence in the earth's atmosphere that 
causes a blurring of images or the ``twinkling'' of stars as viewed at 
nighttime. The LTA will act as a projection system to launch a laser 
beam onto a layer of sodium atoms in the mesosphere, around 90 km above 
the earth's surface, to provide a high quality ``artificial star'' in 
the atmosphere that will be used as a reference in measuring and 
correcting for the blurring effect. Justification for Duty-Free Entry: 
No US-manufactured instruments in the same general category as the 
foreign instrument for the intended use. Application accepted by 
Commissioner of Customs: January 6, 2009.

    February 25, 2009.
Chris Cassel,
Acting Director, IA Subsidies Enforcement Office.
[FR Doc. E9-4468 Filed 3-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3816 STANDARD 29.53 -2.10 10.13

Tolerance

1 3816A VIOLET LIMIT 30.11 -2.34 8.97 0.58 -0.24 -1.16 1.12

2 3816B THIN BLUE 

LIMIT 31.65 -2.73 9.54 2.12 -0.63 -0.59 1.65

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

Shade Number GREEN 2248 Piece/Roll Number 3816

DLA/MARINE CORP SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT September 17, 2020

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, POLY/COTTON 65/35 

SHOULDER/ELBOW PATCH USMC A-A-55239A
No. 09-8666.

#### Richard Eric Hunn, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 962, 130 S. Ct. 1566,

176 L. Ed. 2d 150,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1081.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 344 Fed. Appx. 920.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6526

JOWARSKI RUSSELL NEDD , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Dept of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. John A. Gibney, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 3:23

- cv - 00279

- JAG

- MRC )

Submitted : August 29, 2023 Decided: September 1, 2023

Before KING, AGEE, and BENJAMIN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Jowarski Russell Nedd, Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6526 Doc: 9 Filed: 09/01/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Jowarski Russell Nedd seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his
28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as unauthorized and successive. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not i ssue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debat able and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing
Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). Limiting our review of the record to the issues raised in Nedd ’s informal brief , we conclude that Nedd has not made the requisite showing. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.
We dis pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6526 Doc: 9 Filed: 09/01/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
No. 11-7177.

#### Edward Nash, Petitioner v. New York.

565 U.S. 1125, 132 S. Ct. 1031,

181 L. Ed. 2d 760,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 67.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.

Same case below, 17 N.Y.3d 860, 932 N.Y.S.2d 26, 956 N.E.2d 807.
# C_2016257EN.01001201.xml

| 15.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/12

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2016/C 257/06)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 9.6.2016 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 9.6.2016 till 31.12.2016 |
| Member State | Latvia |
| Stock or Group of stocks | RED/N1G14P and RED/*5-14P |
| Species | Redfish (Sebastes spp.) |
| Zone | Greenland waters of NAFO 1F and Greenland waters of V and XIV + international waters of the Redfish Conservation Area |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 13/TQ72 |

Date and time of closure

9.6.2016

Duration

9.6.2016 till 31.12.2016

Member State

Latvia

Stock or Group of stocks

RED/N1G14P and RED/*5-14P

Species

Redfish (Sebastes spp.)

Sebastes

Zone

Greenland waters of NAFO 1F and Greenland waters of V and XIV + international waters of the Redfish Conservation Area

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

13/TQ72

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p 1.

1

---
No. 11-6257.

#### Gordon Andrew Douglas, Petitioner v. Francisco Jacquez, Warden.

565 U.S. 1116, 132 S. Ct. 1002,

181 L. Ed. 2d 744,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 236.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 626 F.3d 501.
Montana Twenty Second Judicial District Court. County of Big Horn.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- DUANE ALLEN SWANK, JR., Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-12-012

DECISION

On February 17,2016, the Defendant’s suspended sentence was revoked for violation of the conditions of his probation, and he was sentenced to a commitment to the Montana Department of Corrections for a period of eight (8) years, with four (4) years suspended, for the offense of Count I: Robbery, a Felony, in violation of §45-5-401, MCA. The Court granted credit for time served in the Big Horn County Jail in the amount of forty (40) days.

On November 17, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Brent Getty, of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of *116Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

Done in open Court this 17th day of November, 2016.

DATED this 8th day of December, 2016.

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member.
No. 09-8702.

#### Steven Landers, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 984, 130 S. Ct. 1718,

176 L. Ed. 2d 200,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1953.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 346 Fed. Appx. 184.
No. 11-6762.

#### Brandon James Burns, Petitioner v. Montana.

565 U.S. 1095, 132 S. Ct. 848,

181 L. Ed. 2d 554,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 9001.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Montana denied.

Same case below, 361 Mont. 191, 256 P.3d 944.
No. 11-5183.

#### Joseph Edward McConnel, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 894, 132 S. Ct. 279,

181 L. Ed. 2d 166,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5720.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 425 Fed. Appx. 691.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-51108

consolidated with

No. 21-51110

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Leopoldo Pacheco-Apodaca, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:21-CR-552-1

USDC No. 4:21-CR-736-1

Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 12, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-51108 Document: 00516317418 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/12/2022
No. 21-51108 c/w 21-51110

2

Leopoldo Pacheco-Apodaca appeals his conviction and sentence for 

illegal reentry after removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1), along with 

the revocation of the term of supervised release that he was serving at the 

time of the offense. He has not briefed, and has therefore abandoned, any 

challenge to the revocation of supervised release or his revocation sentence. 

See United States v. Reagan, 596 F.3d 251, 254-55 (5th Cir. 2010).

For the first time on appeal, Pacheco-Apodaca contends that 

§ 1326(b) is unconstitutional because it permits a defendant to be sentenced 

above the statutory maximum of § 1326(a) based on the fact of a prior 

conviction that was not alleged in the indictment or found by a jury beyond a 

reasonable doubt. Pacheco-Apodaca correctly concedes that the argument is 

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See, 

e.g., United States v. Pervis, 937 F.3d 546, 553-54 (5th Cir. 2019). However, 

he wishes to preserve the issue for further review and has filed an unopposed 

motion for summary disposition. Because summary disposition is 

appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 

1969), Pacheco-Apodaca’s motion is GRANTED, and the district court’s 

judgment is AFFIRMED.

Case: 21-51108 Document: 00516317418 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/12/2022
No. 09-8287.

#### Gilman Argueta-Fernandez, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 952, 130 S. Ct. 1540,

176 L. Ed. 2d 135,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1127.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 09-406.

#### United States ex rel. Bruce Darian, Petitioner v. David J. Pasternak, et al.

559 U.S. 964, 130 S. Ct. 1571,

176 L. Ed. 2d 154,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1069.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1077, 130 S. Ct. 801, 175 L. Ed. 2d 560, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 8788.
China Green Energy Industries, Inc.: Exhibit 10.45 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.45

Guaranty Obligations Pre-maturity Covenants between the Parties
Dispute Resolution Validity Acknowledgments by the Guarantors Summary of
Guaranty Contract of RMB 3,300,000, with a term of 2 years from November 14,
2011 to November 13, 2013, between Changzhou Kaikai Lighting Co., Ltd, and
Jiangsu Wujin Rural Commercial Bank, guaranteed by Changzhou City Wujin Best
Electronic Cables Co., Ltd. ,Wang Kai and Yao Qin.