alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Wesley Whiting, certify that:

1. I have reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Dynadapt  Systems,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of January 31, 2004; and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  December 9, 2004


/s/Wesley Whiting
- -----------------------
Wesley Whiting,
President
CABLE CUT 

Table IV, left pointer, Defect No. 114, Major defect – Exposed 

seam laminations. Right pointer, Insignificant Defect. Seam 

laminations not exposed by slight cable cut.
CL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0127

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. 

CHRISTOPHER ROBIN LEDEAU,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to

and including August 26, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve the State’s

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 15 2024

07/15/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0127
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 10:07 AM 

To: Cymbalsky, John; Kido, Michael 

Subject: HVAC Energy efficiency 

 

Ref: docket number EE-2013–BT–STD–0007 RIN 1904-AC95

Gentlemen:

As a supporter and proponent of the D O E efforts to improve energy efficiency, I like to submit

www.thermorisecoil.com for your information.

The DEEP coil has been tested analytically and by empirical tests numerous times and by

independent  parties and proven valid and true.  Much information is available on the website.

This technology can be readily implemented with minimal costs and time.  It will allow manufacturers to

comfortably comply and even exceed the proposed minimum standards.

If I can be of any help, please feel free to contact.

Very truly yours,

Hemant D Kale, PE

Thermorise Inc.
No. 09-8449.

#### Chester McCoy, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 957, 130 S. Ct. 1552,

176 L. Ed. 2d 142,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1400.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 333 Fed. Appx. 502.
No. 11-7515.

#### In re Reginald D. Blunt, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 1092, 132 S. Ct. 864,

181 L. Ed. 2d 564,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8957.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
No. 11-7028.

#### Charles Edward Lepp, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1071, 132 S. Ct. 790,

181 L. Ed. 2d 505,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8351.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 446 Fed. Appx. 44.
# C_2016119EN.01000501.xml

| 5.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/5

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Modification of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 119/06)

| Member State | Ireland |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Conamara (Na Mine) Airport – Árainn
  Conamara (Na Mine) Airport – Inis Meáin – Inis Óirr |
| Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 1 February 2002 |
| Date of entry into force of modifications | From 1 October 2016 |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained | Office of Government Procurement |
| Department of Public Expenditure and Reform |
| 3A Mayor Street Upper |
| Spencer Dock |
| Dublin 1 |
| IRELAND |
| http://www.etenders.gov.ie/ |
| Tel. +353 176 1008103 |
| Contact persons: |
| Donal D’Arcy |
| E-mail: Donal.D’arcy@ogp.gov.ie |
| Ciaran Bayly |
| E-mail: Ciaran.Bayly@ogp.gov.ie |

Member State

Ireland

Concerned routes

Conamara (Na Mine) Airport – Árainn

Conamara (Na Mine) Airport – Inis Meáin – Inis Óirr

Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations

1 February 2002

Date of entry into force of modifications

From 1 October 2016

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained

Office of Government Procurement

Department of Public Expenditure and Reform

3A Mayor Street Upper

Spencer Dock

Dublin 1

IRELAND

http://www.etenders.gov.ie/

Tel. +353 176 1008103

Contact persons:

Donal D’Arcy

E-mail: Donal.D’arcy@ogp.gov.ie

Ciaran Bayly

E-mail: Ciaran.Bayly@ogp.gov.ie

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 9, 2009 

1215 

Order 

 

January 9, 2009 

137499 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137499 

 COA: 286347 

Saginaw CC: 07-028676-FC 

CHAD JOHN LEACHMAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 25, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 HATHAWAY, J., not participating.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, F. I. duPont, III, Chairman and CEO of First National Bancshares, Inc.,certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First NationalBancshares, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
(b) **[This paragraph intentionally left blank.]**
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: August 9, 2004    /s/ F. I. duPont, IIIF. I. duPont, III, Chairman & CEO
No. 09-8646.

#### Edward Dane Jeffus, Petitioner v. D. B. Drew, Warden.

559 U.S. 933, 130 S. Ct. 1565,

176 L. Ed. 2d 106,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1076.

February 22, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 147 (Friday, July 31, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40897-40898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20469]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulation Commission
[Docket No. ER98-3794-000]


Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation; Notice of Filing

July 27, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 20, 1998, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 
(NMPC), tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission an executed Transmission Service Agreement between NMPC and 
Public Service Electric and Gas Company. This Transmission Service 
Agreement specifies that Public Service Electric and Gas Company has 
signed on to and has agreed to the terms and conditions of NMPC's Open 
Access Transmission Tariff as filed in Docket No. OA96-194-000. This 
Tariff, filed with FERC on July 9, 1996, will allow NMPC and Public 
Service Electric and Gas Company to enter into separately scheduled 
transactions under which NMPC will provide transmission service for 
Public Service Electric and Gas Company as the parties may mutually 
agree.
    NMPC requests an effective date of July 15, 1998. NMPC has 
requested waiver of the notice requirements for good cause shown.
    NMPC has served copies of the filing upon the New York State Public 
Service Commission and Public Service Electric and Gas Company.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

[[Page 40898]]

and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions and protests will be considered 
by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20469 Filed 7-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), I, Andrew Jackson, hereby certify that, to my knowledge:

|   | (i) | the Company’s Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 to which this Certification isattached as Exhibit 32 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act,and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Ra Medical Systems,Inc. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: November 27, 2019

 

| By:    | /s/ Andrew Jackson                                                                                                        |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Andrew Jackson                                                                                                            |
|   | Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (principal executive officer and principal financial officer) |

 

This certification accompanies the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Ra Medical Systems, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
No. 11-7280.

#### Phillip Angelo Todd, Petitioner v. Rick Hill, Acting Warden.

565 U.S. 1127, 132 S. Ct. 1038,

181 L. Ed. 2d 764,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 334.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. DUANE CHARLES ACKERMAN,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 18

- 16897

D.C. Nos. 3:18

- cv
- 00401

- VC

3:15

- cr
- 00540

- VC

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Vince Chhabria, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 15 , 2019 **

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges. Federal prisoner Duane Charles Ackerman appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Reviewing de novo, see United S tates v.
Reves, 774 F.3d 562, 564 (9th Cir. 2014), we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

OCT 18 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 18

- 16897

Ackerman contends that his initial, retained counsel provided ineffective
assistance leading up to Ackerman’s change of plea hearing

. T he district court did not err by denying Ackerman’s claim. Contrary to Ackerman’s contentions, Ackerman did not enter into his plea agreement while he was represented by his
retained counsel. Instead, Ackerman was appointed and consulted with new counsel before entering the plea agreement. Accordingly, Ackerman cannot
demonstrate he suffered any prejudice from his retained counsel’s alleged deficient performance. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984).
Ackerman next contends that his appointed counsel also rendered ineffective
assistance by failing to advise him about a possible defense strategy to the 18
U.S.C. § 2251 counts. Because t he defense strategy that Ackerman asser ts would
not have succeeded at trial , s ee United States v. Banks, 556 F.3d 967, 97 9

- 80 (9th Cir. 2009) , Ackerman cannot demonstrate that he suffered any prejudice , s ee Hill
v. Lockhart , 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). We decline to consider Ackerman’s remaining ineffective assistance of
counsel claims that were not raised before the district court or in his opening brief.
See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[A]n appellate court
will not consider i ssues not properly raised before the district court. Furthermore, on appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.”).
We treat Ackerman’s additional claims as a motion to expand the certificate3 18

- 16897

of appealability . So treat ed, the motion is den ied

. See 9th Cir. R. 22

- 1(e);
Hiivala v. Wood , 195 F.3d 1098, 1104

- 05 (9th Cir. 1999).
AFFIRMED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-22-00346-CR

Quentin Dewayne DILWORTH,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CR5590

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 10, 2022

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

On February 22, 2021, Appellant Dilworth was charged with possession of a firearm while 

on community supervision. In January 2022, Appellant pled guilty to the unlawful possession of 

a firearm. The trial court entered judgment on January 11, 2022, and certified that Appellant had 

no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). On June 3, 2022, Appellant filed a notice of 

appeal. Contra TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). 
04-22-00346-CR

- 2 -

On July 7, 2022, we ordered Appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should 

not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. On July 8, 2022, Appellant conceded that this appeal 

suffers from jurisdictional defects.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
China Green Energy Industries, Inc.: Exhibit 10.36 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.36

Loan Agreement between Changzhou City Wujin Best Appliances
Co., Ltd. and Wujin Rural Commercial Bank, pursuant to which Wujin Rural
Commercial Bank provided a loan with a total amount of RMB10, 000. The loan term
is from November 30, 2011 to February 28, 2012. The annual interest rate carries
the benchmark interest rate published by the People’s Bank of China.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 17, 2009

p0714 

# Order

July 17, 2009

139029

VALERIE COLBERT-OSAMEUDE, Plaintiff,

v SC: 139029 AGC: 09/000046-GA ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On the order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of President Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TCW Direct Lending VII LLC (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Richard T. Miller, as President of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                  
|--------------------- |  | -----------------
|/s/ Richard T. Miller
|Name:                 |  | Richard T. Miller
|Title:                |  | President        
|Date:                 |  | March 19, 2019   

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed
as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.