alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(1) Adjusting Price $19.94 CWT

(2) Base Price $19.95 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT ($0.01)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.0009)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.0004)

Price change per quart ($0.0002) 

Price change per pint ($0.0001)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.0001)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.0001)

Price change per half pint ($0.0001)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.00)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.00)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.00)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.00)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.00)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.00)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.00)

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Marketing Area Federal Milk Order #51

 Effective Date: Oct. 6, 2019
No. 09-8694.

#### Richard Joseph Finley, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 984, 130 S. Ct. 1718,

176 L. Ed. 2d 200,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1988.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 328 Fed. Appx. 480.
No. 09-8093.

#### William Albert Lee, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 949, 130 S. Ct. 1531,

176 L. Ed. 2d 130,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1117.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 09-8355.

#### In re Edward J. Mierzwa, Petitioner.

559 U.S. 990, 130 S. Ct. 1754,

176 L. Ed. 2d 210,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2269.

March 8, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until March 29, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
No. 09-8288.

#### Philip L. Dale, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 952, 130 S. Ct. 1540,

176 L. Ed. 2d 135,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1190.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restricti ons on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3 v. No. A-1-CA-36230 4 ANDREW J. OROSCO, 5 Defendant-Appellant. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY 7 Angie K. Schneider, District Judge 8 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 9 Santa Fe, NM 10 for Appellee 11 Todd A. Holmes 12 Alamogordo, NM 13 for Appellant 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION 15 GARCIA, Judge. 162 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 1 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 2 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 3 {2} AFFIRMED. 4 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 5

__________________________________ 6 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 7 WE CONCUR: 8

_______________________________ 9 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 10

_______________________________ 11 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 12
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TCW Direct Lending VII LLC (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James G. Krause, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ James G. Krause
|Name:               |  | James G. Krause        
|Title:              |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:               |  | March 16, 2020         

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed
as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4712 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4712

 To amend the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 to clarify 
that the Buy America provision applies to an entire bridge project, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2006

  Mr. Baird introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 to clarify 
that the Buy America provision applies to an entire bridge project, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION.

    Section 165 of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 
(23 U.S.C. 101 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by inserting ``for a project'' after ``shall 
                not obligate''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, before, on, or after the date 
                of obligation of such funds,'' after ``products used''; 
                and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) Applicability to Bridge Project.--If subsection (a) is 
applicable to a component of a bridge project, the Secretary shall 
ensure that subsection (a) applies to the entire bridge project.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

# Agency Holding the Meetings:

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

# DATES:

Week of March 2, 2009.

# Place:

 Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

# Status:

 Public and Closed.

# Additional Items to be Considered:

## Week of March 2, 2009

### Wednesday, March 4, 2009

2:45 p.m. Discussion of Security Issues (Closed—Ex. 1).

* * * * *

* The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on short notice. To verify the status of meetings, call (recording)—(301) 415-1292. Contact person for more information: Rochelle Bavol, (301) 415-1651.

* * * * *

                    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet at:                     *http://www.nrc.gov/​about-nrc/​policy-making/​schedule.html*.                

* * * * *

                    The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another format (e.g. braille, large print), please notify the NRC's Disability Program Coordinator, Rohn Brown, at 301-492-2279, TDD: 301-415-2100, or by e-mail at                     *rohn.brown@nrc.gov*. Determinations on requests for reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis.                

* * * * *

                    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, DC 20555 (301-415-1969). In addition, distribution of this meeting notice over the Internet system is available. If you are interested in receiving this Commission meeting schedule electronically, please send an electronic message to                     *darlene.wright@nrc.gov*.                

Dated: February 25, 2009.

Rochelle C. Bavol,

Office of the Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-4436 Filed 2-26-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-05-404-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.R.C.,

C.D.C., C.C., L.L.C., 

AND M.A.C., CHILDREN	

	------------

	FROM THE 323RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Michael H.-C. and Lucy H. appeal the trial court’s order terminating their parental rights to five of their children.  In two issues, appellants complain that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting certain testimony regarding Michael’s alleged sexual abuse of one of the children, C.D.C.  We affirm.

	In their first issue, appellants complain that the trial court erred by admitting the testimony of a court-appointed special advocate (CASA worker) regarding an outcry about the abuse that K.R.C. and C.D.C. made to the CASA worker at a park, because the children were not shown to be competent witnesses under evidentiary rule 601.2  In their second issue, appellants complain that the testimony of the children’s foster mother regarding a conversation she had with K.R.C. and C.D.C. concerning the abuse is inadmissible under family code section 104.006,3 because the statements K.R.C. made were not about sexual abuse of himself, but referred to alleged sexual abuse of C.D.C.  The Texas Department of Family and Protective Services argues that appellants have waived both complaints by failing to raise them in their statement of points on which they intended to appeal.4

	We do not reach the Department’s argument because, even assuming that appellants preserved their complaints and can show that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting the evidence, any error is harmless.  A judgment may not be reversed on appeal based on trial court error unless the error probably caused the rendition of an improper judgment or probably prevented the appellant from presenting his case to the court of appeals.5  Here, the record is replete with other, unobjected-to evidence that C.D.C. made outcries of sexual abuse against Michael.  For example, both Lucy (C.D.C.’s mother) and C.D.C.’s adult sister testified that C.D.C. had talked about being sexually abused by Michael.  In addition, Teresa Haney, a Child Protective Services investigator, testified that C.D.C.’s sister had reported seeing Michael molest C.D.C. and that C.D.C. had on more than one occasion reported being sexually abused by her brother,6 her uncle, and Michael.  Haney further testified that K.R.C. and C.C. both told her that Lucy had told K.R.C. that Michael had sexually abused C.D.C. 

	Accordingly, because evidence that is the same as or similar to that about which appellants complain was introduced elsewhere during trial without objection, we overrule appellants’ issues and affirm the trial court’s termination order.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL F:	CAYCE, C.J.; GARDNER and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  July 6, 2006
The Honorable Harold D. Vietor, United States District Judge 1

for the Southern District of Iowa.

___________

No. 96-3302

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa.

Rick Lloyd Carmer, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: January 7, 1997

 Filed: January 10, 1997

___________

Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Rick Lloyd Carmer pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of

a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court1

granted the government’s motion for a downward departure under U.S.

Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5K1.1, p.s. (substantial assistance), and

sentenced him to 20 months imprisonment.

Carmer argues on appeal that the district court improperly concluded

it did not have authority to depart downward based on his drug

rehabilitative efforts and the deferral of parole on an Iowa term of

imprisonment. After carefully reviewing the record we conclude that the

district court did not err in sentencing Carmer, and we accordingly affirm

the judgment.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Entech Environmental Technologies, Inc.,
a Florida corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Burr Northrop, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






Date: February
      14, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Burr NorthropBurr
      NorthropPresident
      and Chief
              Executive
      Officer
# C_2016127EN.01000801.xml

| 9.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/8

---

Notice to economic operators — New round of requests for the suspension of the autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties on certain industrial and agricultural products

(2016/C 127/06)

Economic operators are informed that the Commission has received requests in accordance with the administrative arrangements foreseen in the Commission Communication concerning autonomous tariff suspensions and quotas (2011/C-363/02) (1) for the January round of 2017.

1

The list of the products for which a duty suspension is requested is now available on the Commission’s thematic (Europa) website on the customs union (2).

2

Economic operators are also informed that the deadline for objections against new requests to reach the Commission, via the national administrations, is 17 June 2016 which is the date of the second scheduled meeting of the Economic Tariff Questions Group.

Interested operators are advised to consult the list regularly in order to be informed on the status as the requests.

More information on the autonomous tariff suspension procedure can be found on the Europa website:

http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/customs/customs_duties/tariff_aspects/suspensions/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ C 363, 13.12.2011, p. 6.

1

(2)  http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/dds2/susp/susp_home.jsp?Lang=en

2

---
EXHIBIT 10(A)



 EXHIBIT 10(a) 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of Additional
Information and to the use of our reports: (1) dated April 13, 2012, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Life Insurance Company, and (2) dated April 16, 2012, with respect to the financial
statements of the subaccounts of Separate Account VA B, included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 54 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 33-33085) under the Securities Act of 1933 and related Prospectuses of the Transamerica Landmark Variable
Annuity and Members Landmark Variable Annuity. 
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Des Moines, Iowa 
 April 16, 2012
No. 09-8315.

#### Robert George Shafer, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 953, 130 S. Ct. 1542,

176 L. Ed. 2d 136,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1480.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 573 F.3d 267.
# Contents

# IL-City of Chicago

# IL-Rest of State

# NY-City of New York

# NY-Rest of State

# PA-Philadelphia County

# PA-Rest of State

# TX-Bexar County

# TX-City of Houston

# TX-El Paso County

# TX-Rest of State

# Puerto Rico

# Data Notes
# C_2018334EN.01023601.xml

| 19.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 334/236 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 334/236

---

P8_TA(2017)0298

Memorandum of Understanding between the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice and Eurojust *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 5 July 2017 on the draft Council implementing decision approving the conclusion by Eurojust of the Memorandum of Understanding between the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice and Eurojust (07536/2017 — C8-0136/2017 — 2017/0804(CNS))

(Consultation)

(2018/C 334/35)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the Council draft (07536/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Council draft (07536/2017),

| — | having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0136/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0136/2017),

| — | having regard to Council Decision 2002/187/JHA of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime (1), and in particular Article 26(2) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Council Decision 2002/187/JHA of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime (1), and in particular Article 26(2) thereof,

| — | having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0215/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0215/2017),

| 1. | Approves the Council draft; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

---

(1)  OJ L 63, 6.3.2002, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,854
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,095
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     32,268
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          38,267
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            36,903
<LOANS>                                        135,656
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 187,044
<DEPOSITS>                                     159,054
<SHORT-TERM>                                     6,883
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,806
<LONG-TERM>                                      5,473
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,526
<OTHER-SE>                                        (697)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 187,044
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,505
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,927
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   205
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,647
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,840
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,325
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,913
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      119
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,271
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,715
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,715
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,158
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .65
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     6.2
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,102
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,254
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       16
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,357
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,357
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,357


</TABLE>