alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lora C. Barhite, *Appellant,*v. Willard H. Barhite, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed May 20, 1926.

*Landis, Fish & Hull, Leroy B. Giles*and *Erskine*W. *Landis,*for Appellant;

*A. R. Carver,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its .judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Montana Twentieth Judicial District Court. County of Lake.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- KELLY GORDON DUPUIS, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-15-084

DECISION

On February 18, 2016, the Defendant’s deferred sentence was revoked for violation of the conditions and he was sentenced to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of twenty (20) years, with fifteen (15) years suspended, for the offense of Count I: Burglary, a Felony, in violation of §45-6-204(1)(b), MCA. The Defendant was given credit for time served on this revocation of 19 days. The Defendant received credit for 97 days for time served on the original judgment. The Court strongly recommended that the Defendant be screened for NEXUS and Pre-Release if deemed appropriate by the Department of Corrections. The Court recommended that if deemed appropriate by the Department of Corrections, that the Defendant be considered for early release. The Court further ordered that the relevant conditions previously imposed are re-imposed.

On May 5, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant appeared by video conferencing from the Crossroads Correctional Center and was represented by Jennifer Streano of Montana Office of Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also *39increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Done in open Court this 5th day of May, 2016.

DATED this 10th day of June, 2016.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

It is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence imposed is clearly excessive. The Division’s decision is to amend the Judgment to DECREASE the sentence to ten (10) years to the Department of Corrections, with five (5) years suspended. The remaining provisions of the Judgment, including recommendations for treatment, restitution, surcharges and fees are affirmed.

The Division considered the nature of the probation violations which did not involve violence, considered the Co-Defendant’s sentence, and considered the recommendations of the State and Probation Officer in making this modification. The Division determined that to increase the Defendant’s sentence from an original sentence of six years deferred to the maximum commitment of twenty years was excessive.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member.
30 April 2014 ************************

NSN: 8920-01-518-9524 (CMCC) * MONOGRAPH NO: 3C2

 ************************ 

Item: Regular, Soft and chewy, Coconut macaroons, Chocolate chip

Document: A-A-20295, Cookies Packaged in Polymeric Tray, Shelf Stable and PKG&QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 200 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Evenly baked (no scorching or burning), intact and unbroken cookies. Light tan to light 

brown in color. Round with flakes of coconut and uniform distribution of chocolate 

chips.

Odor: NA

Flavor: Creamy, sweet, distinct coconut and chocolate.

Texture: Soft and moist with flakes of coconut.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkening of matrix, chocolate chips may bloom.

Odor: Diminishing of sweet chocolate, rancid, oxidized, scorched, stale, heat stressed.

Flavor: Diminishing of sweet chocolate, rancid, stale, heat stressed.

Texture: Hardening of matrix; excessively hard, dry and brittle.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

NA
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
         (As adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

     For the Quarterly Report of Power Technology, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended July 31, 2002 (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that based on his knowledge: (i) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the period covered in the Report.

Dated: September 16, 2002               By: /s/ LEE A. BALAK
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Lee A. Balak,
                                            Chief Executive Officer, President
                                            and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 10(B)



 EXHIBIT (10)(b) 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of Additional
Information and to the use of our reports: (1) dated April 3, 2012, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio, and (2) dated April 13, 2012, with respect to the financial
statements of the subaccounts of the WRL Series Annuity Account, included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-82705) under the Securities Act of 1933 and related Prospectus of WRL Freedom Premier
Variable Annuity. 
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
 Des Moines, Iowa 
 April 13, 2012
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4768 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4768

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  777 Corporation Street in Beaver, Pennsylvania, as the ``Robert Linn 
                    Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ROBERT LINN MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 777 Corporation Street in Beaver, Pennsylvania, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Robert Linn Memorial Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert 
Linn Memorial Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
************************* 

 * MONOGRAPH NO: 1A1K 

 ************************* 

ITEM: Pasta with Ground Hot Italian Sausage, Shelf Stable (PIS) PRIMARY 

NSN: 8940 01 517 9823 ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR-P-041 Poly Tray 

 (UGR) 

 8940 01 517 9789 PCR-P-042 Tray Can 

 (UGR) 

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 457 Kcals 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM: 

 APPEARANCE: browned ground sausage in a slightly shiny thick/hearty redorange colored tomato sauce with small pieces of chopped tomato and onion; light tan to 

orange colored 1” x 2” ribbon shaped pasta 

 ODOR: spicy cooked Italian tomato sauce with herbs 

 FLAVOR: cooked tomato sauce; well blended mild to moderate red spice, slight 

Italian sausage; slightly salty; Italian herbs 

 TEXTURE: slightly soft/tender to slightly firm pasta; moist 

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36m 

 100 DEGREES F: 6m 

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES: 

 Appearance: darkened; dry; dull 

 Odor: unbalanced spice; metallic; bitter, sour; burnt 

 Flavor: metallic notes, sour, acidic, bitter; loss of spice; burnt; low sausage flavor; 

flavor not well balanced 

 Texture: excessively mushy pasta; dry; rubbery sausage; excessive dryness of 

sausage; excessive graininess of sausage 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: none
No. 11-7151.

#### Robert Bonine Beale, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1124, 132 S. Ct. 1030,

181 L. Ed. 2d 758,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 379,

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
No. 11-7683.

#### Keonakamerah Postell, Petitioner v. McKither Bodison, Warden.

565 U.S. 1168, 132 S. Ct. 1117,

181 L. Ed. 2d 998,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 785.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 442 Fed. Appx. 833.
Order filed, October 24, 2018.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00915-CV

____________

RAY W. WARE, M.D., GUARDIAN FOR THE PERSON AND ESTATE OF 

ALAN KEITH WARE, Appellant

V.

MACARTHUR TOWNHOMES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION BOARD 

OF DIRECTORS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 225th District Court

Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017CI20339

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due October 22, 2018. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Luis Duran, Jr. and Maria E. Fattahi, the court reporters, to file 

the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - Order No. 1605

 Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

*Whereas*, the Lehigh Valley Economic Development Corporation, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 272, submitted an application to the Board for authority to expand its zone to include an additional site (Site 8 163 acres) at the ProLogis Park 33, which would include Temporary Site T-1 on a permanent basis, in Northampton County, Pennsylvania, adjacent to the Lehigh Valley Customs and Border Protection port of entry (FTZ Docket 42-2008, filed 8/1/08);                

*Whereas*, notice inviting public comment was given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (73 FR 46246, 8/8/08), and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,                

*Whereas*, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest;                

*Now, therefore*, the Board hereby orders:                

The application to expand FTZ 272 is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28, and subject to the Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the overall general-purpose zone project.

 Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of February 2009.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest:

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-4236 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 16, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40897 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SANDRA ARREOLA-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-36-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Sandra Arreola-Hernandez appeals her guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Arreola-Hernandez argues that the district court misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines by characterizing her state felony conviction for possession of a controlled substance as an “aggravated felony” under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C). Because Arreola-Hernandez has completed the confinement portion of her sentence, any argument that the term ofNo. 06-40897 -2- incarceration should be reduced is moot, and the only portion of the sentence remaining for consideration is her term of supervised release. However, Arreola-Hernandez has been removed from the United States. Because Arreola-Hernandez is barred from returning to the United States, and there is no indication thatshe has waived her right to be present for resentencing, ArreolaHernandez’s challenge to the validity of her sentence is moot.
See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis , 483 F.3d 381, 383 (5thCir. 2007). The appeal is therefore DISMISSED as to ArreolaHernandez’s sentence. For the first time on appeal, Arreola-Hernandez also challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). ArreolaHernandez’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Arreola-Hernandez contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi , we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Arreola-Hernandez properly concedes that her argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but she raises it here to preserve it for further review. Accordingly, Arreola-Hernandez’s conviction isNo. 06-40897 -3- AFFIRMED; MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF DENIED AS UNNECESSARY.
No. 10-1535.

#### John D. Villanueva, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 976, 132 S. Ct. 497,

181 L. Ed. 2d 345,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7865.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 410 Fed. Appx. 638.
No. 09-7896.

#### Michael Weatherspoon, Petitioner v. John Fayram, Warden.

559 U.S. 945, 130 S. Ct. 1515,

176 L. Ed. 2d 123,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1157.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
No. 11-6165.

#### Monte L. Haney, Petitioner v. Derral G. Adams, Warden.

565 U.S. 1022, 132 S. Ct. 551,

181 L. Ed. 2d 411,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7977,

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 641 F.3d 1168.
(logo)Rialto

CAPITAL

 

 

**2017 AnnualStatement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)**

 

Poolingand Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as ofSeptember 1, 2017 by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities,Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as General MasterServicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as General Special Servicer, NationalCooperative Bank, N.A. as NCB Master Servicer and NCB Special Servicer,Pentalpha Surveillance LLC as Operating Advisor and as Asset RepresentationsReviewer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administratorand Wilmington Trust, National Association as Trustee relating to the BANK2017-BNK7, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-BNK7 **(BANK2017-BNK7)**

 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asspecial servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.       Allservicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under thePooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the SpecialServicer.

 

2.       Areview of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer forthe period of September 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”)in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted undermy supervision.

 

3.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been afailure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failureand the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certifiedby: /s/Adam Singer

AdamSinger, Managing Director

 

Date:March 1, 2018
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4652 

To provide Medicare beneficiaries with access to prescription drugs at Federal 

Supply Schedule prices. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 22, 2005 

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide Medicare beneficiaries with access to prescription 

drugs at Federal Supply Schedule prices. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACCESS OF MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES TO PRE4 SCRIPTION DRUGS AT FEDERAL SUPPLY 

5 SCHEDULE PRICES. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any indi7 vidual who is entitled to benefits under part A, or enrolled 

8 under part B, of title XVIII of the Social Security Act 
2 

•HR 4652 IH 

1 shall be eligible to obtain prescription drugs at the prices 

2 specified in the Federal Supply Schedule. 

3 SEC. 2. NEGOTIATING FAIR PRICES FOR MEDICARE PRE4 SCRIPTION DRUGS ON BEHALF OF MEDICARE 

5 BENEFICIARIES. 

6 Section 1860D–11 of the Social Security Act (42 

7 U.S.C. 1395w–111) is amended by striking subsection (i) 

8 (relating to noninterference) and inserting the following: 

9 ‘‘(i) AUTHORITY TO NEGOTIATE PRICES WITH MAN10 UFACTURERS.—In order to ensure that beneficiaries en11 rolled under prescription drug plans and MA–PD plans 

12 pay the lowest possible price, the Secretary shall have au13 thority similar to that of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 

14 Secretary of Defense, and the heads of other Federal 

15 agencies and departments that purchase prescription 

16 drugs in bulk to negotiate contracts with manufacturers 

17 of covered part D drugs, consistent with the requirements 

18 and in furtherance of the goals of providing quality care 

19 and containing costs under this part.’’. 

Æ