alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-30601

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

David Cortez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 1:18-CR-296-1

Before King, Smith, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

David Cortez pled guilty to murder, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1111, 

and was sentenced to 350 months in prison followed by five years of 

supervised release. Cortez asserts that the district court abused its discretion 

when it imposed a special condition of his supervised release that makes him

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 28, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-30601 Document: 00515841073 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/28/2021
No. 20-30601

2

“subject to financial disclosure throughout the period of supervised release,”

specifically requiring that he “report all household income to U.S. Probation 

as requested” along with “all requested financial documentation.” He 

contends that this condition is not reasonably related to his offense because 

his offense did not involve money, and that the condition is unwarranted 

because he was not ordered to pay a fine or restitution, only a $100 special 

assessment. The Government asserts that Cortez’s argument is not ripe for 

review. 

The question of whether a claim is ripe has jurisdictional implications 

and receives de novo review. United States v. Magana, 837 F.3d 457, 459 (5th 

Cir. 2016). The record reflects that Cortez is not a citizen of the United 

States, and he agreed in his plea agreement to “immediate deportation and 

removal” after his term of imprisonment is complete. As a result, whether 

he will remain in the United States free of custody long enough to trigger the 

challenged special supervised release condition is, at best, a matter of 

conjecture. See id. at 459. His challenge to the condition is thus not ripe, and 

we therefore lack jurisdiction to consider Cortez’s appeal.

The appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Case: 20-30601 Document: 00515841073 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/28/2021
Date: 16 August 2023 * ******************

NSN: 8920-01-709-1660 (MLCH) MONOGRAPH 3D6

 ******************** 

Item: Chocolate, Type II, Flavor 1

Document: PCR-M-018, Mini Loaves and Muffins, Packaged in a Polymeric Tray, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 173 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Fully baked, intact, individual muffin, medium to dark brown exterior and interior 

crumb color. The interior crumb may have air pockets distributed throughout.

Odor: Sweet, chocolate.

Flavor: Sweet, chocolate. 

Texture: Tender and moist.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkening color of interior and exterior.

Odor: Oxidized, burnt, off notes, low or no chocolate flavor.

Flavor: Oxidized, low or no chocolate flavor.

Texture: Dry.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Special Notes
Order entered September 19, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01126-CV

BRIGETTA D’OLIVIO, Appellant

V.

ERHARD HERMUS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-14449

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s September 16, 2019 motion requesting that this Court not 

decide this case before she files her reply brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.3. We GRANT the 

motion. Appellant’s reply brief is due September 30, 2019. See id. 4.1(a); 38.6(c).

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6535] 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Francis Bacon: A Centenary Retrospective”, imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about May 20, 2009, until on or about August 16, 2009, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/453-8048). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

Dated: February 19, 2009. 

C. Miller Crouch, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

 [FR Doc. E9-4249 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
(J? „ sy ^^^ '/u^

^•°'¥ U&

c<Ar * ^

^ <3*r«k ^^

^<^^ Tr7^^^Pr

t^p^^X^

°y^%

uuu

TJ&? V
&z?

~ ^^^T, -^pthJ^ <~£j
{^z c<A^uird-l
<<> *<aj7

x.

^

b

^ <Js/'s)
Exhibit 32.2



SigmaRenoPro, Inc.

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

Section 906 Certifications



In connection with the Annual Report of
SigmaRenoPro, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2022 (the “Report”) I, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
  Act of 1934; and                             
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



This Certification is signed on November 30,
2023.



|SigmaRenoPro, Inc.                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                    
|By: /s/ Ronald Jones                                                                                                
|Ronald Jones,                                                                                                       
|Chief Financial Officer, (principal executive officer, principal accounting officer and principal financial officer)





A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to SIGMARENOPRO, INC. and will be retained by SIGMARENOPRO, INC. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The forgoing certification is being furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7001
BRYANT K. MCARTHUR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ALBERT EARL DAVIS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:05-cv-03266-AMD) Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 28, 2006 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bryant K. McArthur, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Bryant K. McArthur appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McArthur v. Davis , No. 1:05-cv-03266-AMD (D. Md. May 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 11-5667.

#### Kurt Abron, Petitioner v. Gary Swarthout, Warden.

565 U.S. 948, 132 S. Ct. 408,

181 L. Ed. 2d 267,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7272.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 11-7631.

#### Charles Soderman, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1136, 132 S. Ct. 1065,

181 L. Ed. 2d 781,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 463.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 429 Fed. Appx. 663.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

No. 1D18-1257 

_____________________________ 

DENNIS CHRISTENSEN, 

Appellant, 

v. 

JUDY KAY VINZ, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County. 

Don H. Lester, Judge. 

February 8, 2019 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., concur. 

_____________________________ 

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________ 
2 

Dennis Christensen, pro se, Appellant. 

Carol A. Caldwell, St. Augustine, and William S. Graessle and 

Jonathan W. Graessle of Williams S. Graessle, P.A., Jacksonville, 

for Appellee.
# C_2016004EN.01000201.xml

| 8.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 4/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 4/2

---

Notification of Romania pursuant to Article 10(2) of Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and the Council (‘Electricity Directive’) concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity regarding the designation of Compania Națională de Transport al Energiei Electrice ‘Transelectrica’ — S.A. as transmission system operator in Romania

(2016/C 4/02)

Following the Romanian regulatory authority’s final decision of 7 December 2015 regarding the certification of Compania Națională de Transport al Energiei Electrice ‘Transelectrica’ — S.A. as Ownership Unbundled Transmission System Operator (Article 9 of the ‘Electricity Directive’), Romania has notified to the Commission the official approval and designation of this company as a Transmission System Operator operating in Romania, in accordance with Article 10 of the Electricity Directive.

Any additional information can be obtained from:

| Romanian Energy Regulatory Authority (ANRE) |
| --- |
| Str. Constantin Nacu nr. 3, sector 2 |
| 020995 Bucureşti |
| ROMÂNIA |
| Tel. +40 213278100 |
| Fax +40 213124365 |
| Email: anre@anre.ro |
| http://www.anre.ro |

Romanian Energy Regulatory Authority (ANRE)

Str. Constantin Nacu nr. 3, sector 2

020995 Bucureşti

ROMÂNIA

Tel. +40 213278100

Fax +40 213124365

Email: anre@anre.ro

http://www.anre.ro

---
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Julie Stagner; Longmont Properties, LLC; RSJS 

Management, Inc.; RSJS Ventures, LP; and Breck Real 

Properties, LLC, Relators

Appellate case number: 01-18-00758-CV

Trial court case number: 2017-73196

Trial court: 151st District Court of Harris County

On August 22, 2018, relators, Julie Stagner; Longmont Properties, LLC; RSJS 

Management, Inc.; RSJS Ventures, LP; and Breck Real Properties, LLC, filed a petition 

for a writ of mandamus. Their petition seeks to compel the respondent district judge to 

vacate its August 16, 2018 order denying relators’ motion to quash and for protection and 

compelling relators to produce all discovery requested by Colliers and, instead, to compel 

respondent to enter an order granting relators’ motion. Relators have included an appendix 

and record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7.

With the petition, relators also filed an opposed “Motion for Emergency Temporary 

Relief” seeking a temporary stay of enforcement of the August 16, 2018 order, pending 

disposition of this petition, because the order requires relators to produce all discovery 

within ten days of that order and for relator Stagner’s deposition to take place within thirty 

days of that order. Relators’ motion contains the required certificate of compliance. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(a). Real party in interest Colliers International—Atlanta, LLC, filed 

an opposition to the motion.

Accordingly, the Court grants the relators’ motion and ORDERS that the 

enforcement of the August 16, 2018 order is stayed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). This

stay is effective until the mandamus petition is decided or this Court otherwise orders the 

stay lifted. See id. Any party may file a motion for reconsideration. See id. 52.10(c).

Finally, the Court requests a response to the mandamus petition by any real party in 

interest. See TEX.R. APP. P. 52.8(b)(1). The response, if any, shall be filed within 20 days 

from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 52.4.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 24, 2018
No. 11-448.

#### Alex Fayer, aka James McLynn, Petitioner v. Arthur Vaughn, et al.

565 U.S. 1093, 132 S. Ct. 850,

181 L. Ed. 2d 550,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8965.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 649 F.3d 1061.
midwest_ex108.htm


EXHIBIT 10.8


 





 




  





1











  






 





 




  





2











  






 






 




  





3











  






 






 




  





4











  






 






 




  





5











  






 






 




  





6











  






 






 




  





7











  






 






 




  





8











  






 






 




  





9











  






 







 





 


10
# C_2016050EN.01000701.xml

| 10.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 50/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 50/7

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 50/06)

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Reggio Calabria - Pisa and vice versa |
| Period of validity of the contract | From 30 October 2016 until 29 October 2018 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | Two months after the publication of this notice |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained | For further information, please contact:





  National Agency for Civil Aviation (ENAC) |
| Direzione sviluppo trasporto aereo |
| Viale del Castro Pretorio, 118 |
| 00185 Roma |
| ITALIA |
| Tel. +39 0644596564 |
| Tel. +39 0644596591 |
| Email | : | osp@enac.gov.it |
| Internet | : | http://www.mit.gov.it
  http://www.enac.gov.it |

Member State

Italy

Route concerned

Reggio Calabria - Pisa and vice versa

Period of validity of the contract

From 30 October 2016 until 29 October 2018

Deadline for submission of tenders

Two months after the publication of this notice

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained

For further information, please contact:

National Agency for Civil Aviation (ENAC)

Direzione sviluppo trasporto aereo

Viale del Castro Pretorio, 118

00185 Roma

ITALIA

Tel. +39 0644596564

Tel. +39 0644596591

Email

:

osp@enac.gov.it

Internet

:

http://www.mit.gov.it

http://www.enac.gov.it

---
16 July 2014 ***********************

NSN: 8940-01-621-5507 (TCKB) * MONOGRAPH M4M5 

 *********************** 

Item: Toasted corn kernels, Barbecue (Type VI, Flavor 2)

Document: A-A-20195, Snack Foods and PKG&QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 255 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Light to medium red color with fine grain salt on the surface.

Odor: Mild, spicy, barbecue.

Flavor: Mild, spicy, barbecue.

Texture: Crispy, lightly crunchy but not hard.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkened color.

Odor: Stale/ rancid, scorched or other non-typical odor.

Flavor: Stale/ rancid, scorched or other non-typical flavor.

Texture: Soft, not firm and crunchy, extremely hard.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

This product should contain an oxygen scavenger. If defects such as oxidized or rancid odors or flavors 

exist, they are likely due to package failure or the absence of an oxygen scavenger.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 1162

NISHITH PATEL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. HONORABLE ANNE ALBRIGHT; HONORABLE MARY ELLEN BARBERA; HONORABLE STUART BERGER , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. George Jarrod Hazel , District Judge. ( 8:21

- cv - 02409

- GJH )

Submitted : December 29, 2022 Decided: February 3, 2023

Before WILKINSON and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Nishith Patel, Appellant Pro Se. Kathryn Elizabeth Hummel, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions ar e not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1162 Doc: 19 Filed: 02/03/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Nishith Patel appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
action . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s order

. P atel v. Albright , No. 8:21

- cv - 02409

- GJH (D. Md. Oct. 26, 2021) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-1162 Doc: 19 Filed: 02/03/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
# C_2016061EN.01000301.xml

| 17.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/3

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Zimbabwe apply

(2016/C 61/04)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 (2), concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Zimbabwe.

2

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with Section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

3

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 55, 24.2.2004, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

3

---