alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Education

# AGENCY:

Department of Education.

# ACTION:

Correction notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        On February 25, 2009, the Department of Education published a comment period notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         (Page 8515, Column 2) for the information collection, “Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) Deferment Request Forms”. This notice amends the invitation for comment period for interested persons to March 27, 2009. The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, hereby issues a correction notice as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.                    

Dated: February 26, 2009.

Angela C. Arrington,

IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management.

[FR Doc. E9-4462 Filed 3-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
Montana Fourth Judicial District Court. County of Missoula.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- DUSTIN MARK HENRY, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-08-581

DECISION

On January 14, 2016, the Defendant’s suspended sentence was revoked for violation of conditions and he was sentenced to the Montana State Prison for a term of two (2) years, for the offense of Count I: Deceptive Practices, a Felony. This sentence was ordered to run consecutive to the sentence imposed in DC-11-438. The Court recommended the Treasure State Boot Camp. The terms and conditions of the suspended portion of this Judgment were the same as those contained in the Judgment filed with the Court on May 5, 2009. The Defendant received credit for time served in the amount of 84 days.

On May 6, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant appeared by video conferencing from the Crossroads Correctional Center and was represented by Peter Ohman of the Office of the *44State Public Defender. The State was not represented. Judge John Larson appeared and testified.

Done in open Court this 6th day of May, 2016.

DATED this 10th day of June, 2016.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member.
Power of Attorney, dated January 16, 2012, of Tianxing Wang



 Exhibit 4.69 
 [Translation of Chinese Original] 
 Power of Attorney 

Principal: Tianxing Wang 
 Address:
[                    ] 
 Attorney-in-Fact:
Beijing Super TV Co., Ltd. 
 Registered Address: 4-406 Jingmeng High-Tech Building B, No. 5-2 Shangdi East Road, 

Haidian District, Beijing 
 I,
Tianxing Wang, hereby irrevocably authorize Beijing Super TV Co., Ltd. (or its designated third party) to act as my Attorney-in-Fact and exercise the following rights during the term of this Power of Attorney: 

Beijing Super TV Co., Ltd. (or its designated third party) is authorized to exercise, as my plenipotentiary Attorney-in-Fact, all of the
rights to vote as a shareholder at the shareholders’ meetings of Beijing Novel-Super Digital TV Technology Co., Ltd. (“N-S Digital TV”), that I have under laws and the Article of Association of N-S Digital TV, including but not
limited to selling or transferring all or any part of my equity in N-S Digital TV and rights to vote, at the shareholders’ meetings of N-S Digital TV, on the nomination and appointment of directors of N-S Digital TV. 

I, the Principal, will assume all legal effects of all actions performed by the Attorney-in-Fact on my behalf under this Power of
Attorney. 
 The term of this Power of Attorney is 10 years, starting from the date of its execution, unless the Share Pledge
Agreement (Appendix 1) by and between Beijing Super TV Co., Ltd. and Tianxing Wang should terminate early for any reason. If the term of the Share Pledge Agreement (Appendix 1) is extended, that of this Power of Attorney shall be automatically
extended accordingly, always based on the last executed Share Pledge Agreement. All matters under this Power of Attorney shall be governed by laws of China. This Power of Attorney is written in Chinese. 

 

	
	Principal: Tianxing Wang
	
	/s/ Tianxing Wang
	
	January 16, 2012









 Appendix 1 
 Share Pledge Agreement (Omitted)
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

NICHOLAS BRICE, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-36 

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed December 19, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee 

County; Hunter W. Carroll, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and VILLANTI and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
No. 11-5616.

#### Larry Williams, Petitioner v. W. Thompson, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1082,

181 L. Ed. 2d 800,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 501.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 947, 132 S. Ct. 406, 181 L. Ed. 2d 265, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7356.
No. 11-6731.

#### Quentin Anderson, Petitioner v. Willie L. Eagleton, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 1083, 132 S. Ct. 823,

181 L. Ed. 2d 533,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8783.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 259.
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

Monograph No. BO6 

09 September 2005 

NSN: 8940-01-368-1615

Item: Gravy Mix, Chicken, Instant 

Document: COTS 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: NA Component Classification: Ancillary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 24 months 80°F 

Item Characteristics

Appearance: 

Gravy Mix shall be free flowing powder uniform in composition and appearance, free 

from lumps that do not fall apart under light finger pressure. 

Prepared: Chicken gravy shall be a light yellow to golden brown moderately thick 

gravy and may have a greenish tint. 

Odor: Chicken Gravy Mix shall possess a slight cooked chicken odor with various spices. 

Prepared: Cooked chicken odor with various spices. 

Flavor: Chicken Gravy Mix shall possess a cooked chicken flavor with mild spice notes. 

Prepared: Cooked chicken gravy flavor with spice notes. 

Texture: Gravy mix shall be free flowing. 

Prepared: Product shall readily attain a smooth gravy consistency. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: May darken and/or clump. 

Odor: May become musty, rancid, stale, bitter or other objectionable odors. 

Flavor: May become musty, rancid, stale, bitter or other objectionable flavors. 

Texture: May Clump. 

Prepared: Product shall readily attain a smooth gravy consistency. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Prepare as directed on label.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00822-CV

In re State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

The parties filed a joint motion to abate this original proceeding pending a 

decision by the Supreme Court in a case the parties say raises the same issue as in this case. This 

Court grants the motion and abates this appeal until further order of this Court. The parties shall 

file a status report no later than thirty days following the Supreme Court’s final decision.

Before Justices Baker, Triana, and Smith

Filed: February 15, 2024
exhibit10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT












This Amendment to the June 25, 1998 Employment Agreement (as amended from time to time, the “Employment Agreement”) between East West Bancorp, Inc. (“Company”) and Dominic Ng (“Employee”) is entered into as of this 9th day of April, 2012 by and between Company and Employee.







The following terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement are hereby modified:







1.           Section 3.1 (Term) of the Agreement is hereby modified in its entirety to read as follows:  This Agreement and employment under this Agreement shall terminate on April 8, 2015 unless extended by Company.







2.           Except as expressly agreed to herein, the Employment Agreement between the parties shall remain in force and effect.







EAST WEST BANCORP, INC.







By: _________________________












____________________________


Employee:  Dominic Ng
No. 11-7624.

#### Raul Ortiz-Miranda, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1136, 132 S. Ct. 1065,

181 L. Ed. 2d 781,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 448.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreementdated as of July 25, 2017, by and among MORGAN STANLEY CAPITAL I INC., asDepositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator and Custodian and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as OperatingAdvisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2017-237P (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. 

 

Pursuant to Section 10.8 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober,Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certifythat: 

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Servicer during the period from July 25, 2017 through December 31, 2017(the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during suchperiod has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period. 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificateas of the 28th day of February 2018. 

 

/s/ DanielBober

DanielBober 

Executive Vice President

WellsFargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4467]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-469-814]


Chlorinated Isocyanurates from Spain: Extension of Time Limit for 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 3, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Myrna Lobo, AD/CVD Operations, Office 
6, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2371.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 30, 2008, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published the notice of initiation of the administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on chlorinated isocyanurates from Spain for the 
period June 1, 2007 through May 31, 2008. See Initiation of Antidumping 
and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, Request for Revocation 
in Part, and Deferral of Administrative Review, 73 FR 44220 (July 30, 
2008). The preliminary results of this administrative review are 
currently due no later than March 2, 2009.

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1), the Department shall issue 
preliminary results in an administrative review of an antidumping duty 
order within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of 
the date of publication of the order. The Act further provides, 
however, that the Department may extend that 245-day period to 365 days 
if it is not practicable to complete the review within the foregoing 
time period. See id.; see also 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).
    The Department finds that it is not practicable to complete the 
preliminary results by the current deadline of March 2, 2009 because it 
needs additional time to fully analyze the sales and cost-of-production 
supplemental questionnaire responses that are due from respondent, and 
to conduct cost and sales verifications of the questionnaire responses. 
Therefore, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the 
Department has decided to extend the time limit for the preliminary 
results by 78 days to May 19, 2009. Unless extended, the final results 
continue to be due 120 days after the publication of the preliminary 
results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and section 
351.213(h) of the Department's regulations.
    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: February 25, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. E9-4467 Filed 3-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
No. 11-580.

#### Thomas F. Spellissy, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1114, 132 S. Ct. 1037,

181 L. Ed. 2d 739,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 149.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 780.
TEM: Raisins (RNS) MONOGRAPH NO.: KD1

VENDOR: Ameriqual

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE: 281 Kilocalories.

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Wrinkled, dark brown, uniform in size; slight clumping of raisins is

permissible.
ODOR: Sweet, fruity, slightly fermented.
FLAVOR: Sweet to slightly sweet, fruity, fermented raisin.
TEXTURE: Soft and chewy.
DEFECTS LIKELY TO OCCUR:

APPEARANCE: Increased darkening of color and clumping of raisins.

ODOR: Increased fermentation, staleness.
FLAVOR: Increased fermentation, loss of flavor or increased staleness.
TEXTURE: Increased chewiness due to dryness.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None

SPECIAL NOTES: Product may show evidence of a white powder/crystallization within the
"wrinkles", this is not considered a defect.

54
#### State v. Meacham

2016 MT 334N

DA 16-0174

12/20/16

Affirmed

Dist. 4 (Missoula)
No. 09-701.

#### Allrite Sheetmetal, Inc., Petitioner v. Bank of Commerce, et al.

559 U.S. 939, 130 S. Ct. 1525,

176 L. Ed. 2d 114,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1286.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 388 Ill. App. 3d 1130, 367 Ill. Dec. 605, 982 N.E.2d 283.
So
Rare”

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
TROOP SUPPORT
700 ROBBINS AVENUE
PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19111-5092

FTG December 18, 2019
To: All Subsistence Prime Vendors (SPVs)
Re: AbilityOne Program

Dear Vendors,

DLA Troop Support firmly supports the AbilityOne program. SPVs are reminded that use of the items
contained on the Mandatory Products List (MPL) is based in federal statute and a requirement of your
contract. | echo the sentiment expressed in General Lawrence’s letter dated October 31, 2019 (attached).
That is, not only is it law to follow the statute, it is the right thing to do. The AbilityOne program supports
the Warfighter with high quality products at fair market prices, as well as supporting the blind and/or
severely disabled members of our society, to include veterans returning from active duty.

Mandatory food items and non-food items are listed on DLA Troop Support’s website at
http://www.dla.mil/TroopSupport/Subsistence/FoodServices/AbilityOne.aspx

Please review the list to ensure you are in compliance with your contract and supplying mandatory items
to our customers. I challenge you to begin using AbilityOne products for your commercial customers as
well. These items have been tested to ensure quality and are often sourced from the same manufacturers
as their brand name equivalent.

A representative from my office may participate in pre award and post award conferences to reinforce this
message. During cataloging sessions, your Contracting Officer and/or Tailored Vendor Logistics
Specialist will ensure your firm does not catalog a competing item. If you are the incumbent, you are
required to procure the correct mandatory items for your customers' catalogs and eliminate competing
items immediately. DLA Troop Support will remain actively engaged to track compliance. You are
reminded that regulatory compliance is an element in the Contractor Performance Assessment Rating
System (CPARS) and your noncompliance with the MPL may be documented in your assessment.
Individual SPV issues should be communicated with the Contracting Officer for your contract.

If you have any further questions about the AbilityOne program, the points of contact are:
Timothy.Dlugokecki@dla.mil and Alyssa.Marley@dla.mil.

Thank you for your continued support of the AbilityOne program.

Sincerely,

fe Samoni

Chief, SMSG Division
Directorate of Subsistence
DLA Troop Support
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Golub Capital BDC 3, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Registrant”), for the annual period ended September 30, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, David B. Golub and Ross A. Teune, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:
 
 (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and
 
 (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date: December 5, 2019/s/  David B. GolubDavid B. GolubChief Executive Officer/s/  Ross A. TeuneRoss A. TeuneChief Financial Officer
CURO Group Holdings Corp.


December __, 2017


VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL


[NAME]


Re: Notice and Acknowledgement of Acceleration of Special Bonus Payments


Dear [NAME]:


The purpose of this letter is to inform you that in connection with the initial public offering of CURO Group Holdings Corp. (the “ Company ”), the board of directors (the “ Board ”) has approved the acceleration and payment in full of [[$[___],$[___],$[___] and $[___]], the remaining amounts payable to you under the special bonus notices from the Company delivered to you on each of [May 15, 2017, August 10, 2017, October 16, 2017 and November 2, 2017, respectively].  The Board has implemented such acceleration to reward and recognize as key contributors certain employees of the Company.  All amounts payable to you hereunder shall be subject to all applicable withholding.


Accordingly, you acknowledge, by signing below, that the payment to you of $[__] is in full and final satisfaction of all amounts due or otherwise payable to you under the special bonus notices, and you release any and all rights arising in connection therewith.  Please confirm your understanding and agreement with the terms and conditions summarized by this letter by signing below and returning a copy to [___] at your earliest convenience.


We thank you for your contributions to the success of the Company and look forward to your continued contribution to the future success of the Company.  If you have any questions, please contact [_____] at ([__]) [____] or [_______].


Sincerely,


CURO Group holdings corp


__________________________________


By:


Title:


ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:


____________________________


NAME


Date:
No. 09-8413.

#### Josue Rogel-Torres, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 956, 130 S. Ct. 1551,

176 L. Ed. 2d 141,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1433.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 333 Fed. Appx. 892.
No. 11-7076.

#### In re John T. Vance, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 1109, 132 S. Ct. 1025,

181 L. Ed. 2d 794,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 455.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.