alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016182EN.01000201.xml

| 20.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/2

---

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/183/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/785, concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

(2016/C 182/03)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entity that appear in Annex II to Council Decision 2013/183/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/785 (2), concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.

1

2

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons and entity that appear in the abovementioned Annex should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2013/183/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. The grounds for the listing of the persons and entity concerned appear in the relevant entries in that Annex.

The attention of the persons and entity concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Council Regulation (EC) No 329/2007 of 27 March 2007 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (3), in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 8 of the Regulation).

3

The persons and entity concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons and entity concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 111, 23.4.2013, p. 52.

1

(2)  OJ L 131, 20.5.2016, p. 73.

2

(3)  OJ L 88, 29.3.2007, p. 1.

3

---
No. 11-7611.

#### Terrance T. Burke, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1136, 132 S. Ct. 1064,

181 L. Ed. 2d 780,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 424.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RICHARD URBANOVSKY, Individually

and as Trustee of the

Urbanovsky Family Trusts

,

Appellant,

v.

FRANK URBANOVSKY, EDITH VICK,

MARY L. SMITH, and THEODORE

URBANOVSKY

,

Appellee s

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 21

- 00182

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law

of Hill County, Texas

(TC# CV727

- 19CCL )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on Appellees ’ M otion to D ismiss for Lack of

Jurisdiction and concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed for

want of jurisdiction. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction . We further order

Appellant pay all costs of this appeal, and this d ecision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 21 S T DAY OF OCTOBER , 20 22

.

JEFF ALLEY

, Justice

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-5086 CHRISTOPHER J. GRUSH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in 07-CV-232,

Judge Edward J. Damich. ON MOTION 

### ORDER The United States moves without opposition to stay the briefing schedule in this appeal pending disposition of 

### Easter v. United States 2008-5187, and 

### Forbes v. United States 2009-5030. The United States asserts that this appeal and 

### Easter and 

### Forbes all involve the issue of whether the Court of Federal Claims correctly decided that the appellants were not entitled to overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et 

### seq. for time spent driving a government vehicle between home and work. The United States asserts that the court's decision in 

### Easter and 

### Forbes may resolve the overtime pay issues in this case. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:The motion is granted. The United States is directed to notify this court within 21

days of the date both mandates have issued in Easter and Forbes concerning how they believe this appeal should proceed. The appellant may also respond within that time. FOR THE COURT 

### JUL 24 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk Date

cc: Jules Bernstein, Esq. Shalom Brilliant, Esq. s20 ILED U.S. COURT

F OF APPEALS FOR THE F EDERAL CIRCUIT

JUL 2 4 2009 JAW Hummel' CLERK

2009-5086 2
No. 09-734.

#### Geoffrey S. Ames, Petitioner v. Washington State Health Department Medical Quality Health Assurance Commission.

559 U.S. 939, 130 S. Ct. 1528,

176 L. Ed. 2d 115,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1225.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington denied.

Same case below, 166 Wash. 2d 255, 208 P.3d 549.
# C_2016417EN.01000504.xml

| 11.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 417/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 417/5

---

EUROPEAN FISHERIES CONTROL AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2015

(2016/C 417/19)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.efca.europa.eu/library?f[0]=field_library_type%3A67

---
No. 11-5852.

#### Faith Hope Hamilton, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1102, 132 S. Ct. 871,

181 L. Ed. 2d 568,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8927.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

*569Former decision, 565 U.S. 923, 132 S. Ct. 352, 181 L. Ed. 2d 222, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7089.
No. 09-8001.

#### Eric Taylor, et ux., Petitioners v. Samuel L. Jacobs, et al.

559 U.S. 947, 130 S. Ct. 1524,

176 L. Ed. 2d 127,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1280.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District, denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1999, and the Consolidated  Statement
of  Operations  for the three  months  ended  March  31,  1999 of  Mission  West
Properties,  Inc.,  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to  such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>                       
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         134
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         530,104
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8113)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 526,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       8
<OTHER-SE>                                     34,193
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   526,806
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               16,412
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,311
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,109
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,387
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                881
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            881
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   881
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .10
        



</TABLE>
No. 09-8484.

#### James Floyd Cleaver, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 958, 130 S. Ct. 1555,

176 L. Ed. 2d 144,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1488.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 319 Fed. Appx. 728.
# FY08

# FY09 YTD

# FY10

# FY11

# FY12
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7150

EUGENE JEROME CUNNINGHAM,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DARLENE DREW, Warden – FCI Bennettsville,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Beaufort. Cameron McGowan Currie, District 

Judge. (9:11-cv-03179-CMC)

Submitted: January 22, 2014 Decided: January 29, 2014

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene Jerome Cunningham, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier 

Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Eugene Jerome Cunningham appeals from the district 

court’s order denying his motion to void its earlier judgment 

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. See Wendt v. Leonard, 431 F.3d 410, 

412-13 (4th Cir. 2005) (providing standard in Rule 60(b)(4) 

action). Accordingly, we affirm the challenged order. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 20, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-31021 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RONALD R. HARVEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:05-CR-60-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

Ronald R. Harvey appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm. He argues that he was sentenced in violation of his plea agreement and that the district court erred in upwardly departing.

For the first time on appeal, Harvey argues that the terms of his plea agreement were violated by (1) the district court’s upward departure from the advisory guideline range; (2) the Government’s failure to move for a third acceptance-of-2

responsibility credit; and (3) the district court’s failure to offer him the opportunity to withdraw his plea. Affording his argument plain error review, United States v. Munoz , 408 F.3d 222, 226 (5th Cir. 2005), we hold that the conduct of the district court and the Government was entirely consistent with the parties’ reasonable understanding of the agreement. See United States v. Wilder , 15 F.3d 1292, 1295 (5th Cir. 1994). Consequently, his breach argument fails. Harvey additionally argues for the first time on appeal that the district court ’s upward departure was erroneous. Affording this argument plain error review, United States v. Jones , 444 F.3d 430, 436 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 2958 (2006), we hold that Harvey has shown no error, plain or otherwise. To the extent that Harvey seeks to challenge the district court’s refusal to award him a two-level § 3E1.1 adjustment, that issue is inadequately briefed and is therefore waived. United States v. Thames , 214 F.3d 608, 611 n.3 (5th Cir. 2000).

AFFIRMED.
# C_2016336EN.01000301.xml

| 13.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/3

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2016/C 336/03)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 2.7.2016 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 2.7.2016–31.12.2016 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or Group of stocks | HAD/7X7A34 |
| Species | Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) |
| Zone | VIIb-k, VIII, IX and X; Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 16/TQ72 |

Date and time of closure

2.7.2016

Duration

2.7.2016–31.12.2016

Member State

Belgium

Stock or Group of stocks

HAD/7X7A34

Species

Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus)

(Melanogrammus aeglefinus)

Zone

VIIb-k, VIII, IX and X; Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

16/TQ72

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-2303

In re: PHILIP JAY FETNER,

Debtor.

------------------------------------

PHILIP JAY FETNER,

Debtor - Appellant,

v.

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY; HOTEL STREET CAPITAL; IRS; 

US TRUSTEE; STEPHEN S. ROSZEL, VII, et.al.,

Creditors - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Rossie David Alston, Jr., District Judge. (1:19-cv-00899-RDA-IDD)

Submitted: April 16, 2020 Decided: April 20, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Philip J. Fetner, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Ann Levene, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT 

OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Hugh Michael Bernstein, OFFICE OF THE UNITED 
2

STATES TRUSTEE, Baltimore, Maryland; Andrew Justin Narod, BRADLEY ARANT 

BOULT CUMMINGS LLP, Washington, D.C.; William Davis Ashwell, MARK B. 

WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES, PLC, Warrenton, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Philip Jay Fetner appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his bankruptcy appeal 

as untimely and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Fetner v. Wilmington Sav. Fund, No. 1:19-cv-00899-RDA-IDD (E.D. Va. Sept. 9, 2019; 

Oct. 17, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
MODULAR OPERATIONAL RATION ENHANCEMENT 

(MORE)

TABLE M

COMPONENT AND CLASSIFICATION

The below listed abbreviations for each component are provided for use when completing 

inspection records.

COMPONENT CODE CLASS MONOGRAPH

Beef Snack Strips, Smoked BSSK Ancillary M10AP*

Beverage Bases, w/Nutritive Sweetener Orange 

Beverage Bases, w/Nutritive Sweetener Lemon-Lime 

Beverage Bases, w/Nutritive Sweetener Grape 

Beverage Bases, w/Nutritive Sweetener Tropical Punch

ONS 

LLNS 

GNS 

TPNS

Secondary 

Secondary 

Secondary 

Secondary

M7FP* 

M7EP* 

M7D2P* 

M7JP*

Beverage Powder, Carbohydrate Electrolyte, Fruit Punch 

Beverage Powder, Carbohydrate Electrolyte, Grape 

Beverage Powder, Carbohydrate Electrolyte, Lemon-Lime 

Beverage Powder, Carbohydrate Electrolyte, Orange

ONS 

LLNS 

GNS 

TPNS

Secondary 

Secondary 

Secondary 

Secondary

M7FP* 

M7EP* 

M7D2P* 

M7JP*

Caffeinated Chocolate Pudding DPC Primary M4A12P*

Chewing Gum Tablet or Disk w/Caffeine, Peppermint or 

Cinnamon

CGC Ancillary FS6-01P*

Crackers, Fortified, Plain CFP Primary M4MP*

Energy Gel, Mixed Berry 

Energy Gel, Lemon Lime 

Energy Gel, Orange

EGB 

EGL 

EGO

Secondary 

Secondary 

Secondary

FS3-13 

FS3-14P* 

FS3-15P*

First StrikeTM Bar, Chocolate 

First StrikeTM Bar, Mocha Mini

FSBC

FSBC

Primary

Secondary

FS3-02P* 

FS3-08

Cranberries, Sliced, Plain, CSN Secondary M5OP*

Applesauce, Carbohydrate Enhanced, Sweetened, Regular 

Applesauce, Carbohydrate Enhanced, Sweetened, Regular, 

Cinnamon

ACS 

WPFA

Secondary 

Secondary

M5L 

FS4-01

Almonds, Smoked ASF Secondary M10TP*

Nuts and Raisins with Pan Coated Chocolate Disks 

Nuts with Raw Sunflower Kernels and Infused Fruit

MMM 

NSF

Primary 

Primary

FS3-09A 

FS3-09

Filled Pretzels, Cheddar Cheese

Baked Snack Crackers, Hot and Spicy Cheese 

Toasted Corn Kernels, Plain, Salted

PCC 

CHS 

TCK

Primary 

Primary 

Primary

M10Q 

M6N 

M4M4

Spread Soup Mix, Cheddar Potato with Artificial Bacon Bits SSMC Primary FS5-01

Toaster Pastries, Frosted, Brown Sugar Cinnamon TPC Primary M4A1P*

* Denotes that the Monograph is provisional and will be replaced once updated.
URI-3.31.2012-Ex 10h






Exhibit 10(h)


THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), is made and entered into as of the 28 day of March 2012, by and between United Rentals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Jonathan M. Gottsegen, a resident of the State of New York (“Executive”).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive previously entered into an Employment Agreement, dated as of February 2, 2009, which was subsequently amended effective as of March 31, 2010 and February 2, 2009 (as so amended, the “Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, on March 8, 2012, the Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors determined to increase the amount of Severance Pay to which Executive shall be entitled in the event Executive's employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by Executive for Good Reason; and
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Agreement to reflect such increase.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
		
	1.
	Pursuant to and in accordance with Section 7(l) of the Agreement, the first sentence of Section 4(d)(iv) of the Agreement is hereby amended and replaced in full with the following language:


“(iv) an amount equal to 180% of Executive's Base Salary as of the date of Executive's termination, payable in substantially equal bi-weekly installments during the 12-month period following the date of Executive's termination in accordance with the Company's normal payroll practices (the “Severance Pay”).”
		
	2.
	Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.


		
	3.
	Capitalized terms used herein but not defined herein shall have the respective meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.


		
	4.
	This Amendment may be amended only by a writing which makes express reference to this Amendment as the subject of such amendment and which is signed by Executive and, on behalf of the Company, by its duly authorized officer.


		
	5.
	This Amendment shall be governed by and construed (both as to validity and performance) and enforced in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Connecticut applicable to agreements made and to be performed wholly within such jurisdiction, without regard to the principles of conflicts of law or where the parties are located at the time a dispute arises.


[Signature page follows.]









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.
	
		
	UNITED RENTALS, INC.




By:  /s/ Michael J. Kneeland
Name:Michael J.  Kneeland
Title:President and Chief Executive 
Officer
	EXECUTIVE




/s/ Jonathan M. Gottsegen
Jonathan M. Gottsegen
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON



### O RDER

Cause No 01

- 1 1

- 00326

- CV ; Steve Stephens v. Precision Drilling Servs. Corp.

Appeal from Cause No. 2009

- 30296

- A , in the 234th District Court of Harris County,

Texas.

On November 4

, 2011

, appellee

, Precision Drilling , filed a motion to strike pages of the

appellants’ reply brief

. We deny the motion

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge ’ s signature: /s/ Michael M a s sengale

Acting for the Court

P anel consists of Justices Jennings , Massengale, and Huddle

Date: M a y 7, 2013
Extension and Amendment to Quartz Sand Products Purchase Agreement



 Exhibit 10.33 
 SECOND EXTENSION AND AMENDMENT TO 
 QUARTZ SAND PRODUCTS PURCHASE
AGREEMENT 
 This Second Extension and Amendment to Quartz Sand Products Purchase Agreement, effective as of December 31,
2011 (the “Second Extension and Amendment”), by and between Unimin Corporation (“Seller”) and Momentive Performance Materials Quartz, Inc. (formerly known as GE Quartz, Inc.) (“Buyer”). Defined terms used herein and not
otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given such terms in the “Agreement” (as defined herein below). 

WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer are parties to a certain Quartz Sand Products Purchase Agreement, effective as of February 15, 2005, as
amended, including but not limited to that certain Extension and Amendment to Quartz Sand Products Purchase Agreement effective as of December 31, 2010 (together, the “Agreement”); and 

WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer wish to amend the Agreement to provide for an extension of the term thereof and certain other changes thereto
as provided herein; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration, the Seller
and Buyer do hereby agree that the Agreement is amended as follows: 
 1.     The Extension Term is extended through June
30, 2012. 
 2.     Notwithstanding anything in the Agreement to the contrary, during the period January 1, 2012 through
June 30, 2012 the prices for: (i) [***] shall be [***] per short ton, (ii) [***], shall be [***] per short ton, (iii) [***] shall be [***] per short ton, and (iv) [***] shall be [***] per short ton. 

3.     The Agreement, as amended hereby, remains in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and affirmed. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Second Extension and Amendment to be duly executed effective as of the date first
written above. 
  

											
	MOMENTIVE PERFORMANCE MATERIALS QUARTZ, INC.	  		  		  	UNIMIN CORPORATION
						
	By:	 	/s/ Authorized Person	  		  		  	By:	 	/s/ Authorized Person
						
	Date:	 	2/28/12	  		  		  		 	

 Legend 

*** - indicates Confidential Terms redacted pursuant to Rule 406. Such redacted material has been filed separately with the Securities Exchange
Commission.
Burns and McDonnell, Inc.

Response to EPA's Section 114 Request

September 7, 2010

(CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT)