alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-6675.

#### Kenneth Wayne Mikell, Sr., Petitioner v. Todd Thomas, Warden.

565 U.S. 1067, 132 S. Ct. 778,

181 L. Ed. 2d 498,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8512.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
ex-10_1.htm










Moody National REIT I, Inc.






 


EXHIBIT 10.1




 


ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF PURCHASE AGREEMENT


 


For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, MOODY NATIONAL COMPANIES, LP, a Texas limited partnership (“Assignor”), hereby assigns to Moody National Wood-Hou Holding, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignee”), all of Assignor's rights and obligations under and in regard to that certain Purchase Agreement dated and effective March 22, 2012, as amended to the date hereof (as amended, the “Purchase Agreement”), by and amongWoodlands Terrapin Investors I, LLC, Woodlands Terrapin Investors II, LLC, Woodlands Terrapin Investors III, LLC, 537 Houston, LLC, Marc Hotel Houston, LLC, Miriam Hotel Houston, LLC and Terrapin Operator Woodlands, LLC, as sellers,and Assignor for the purchase and sale of Homewood Suites Woodlands located 28913 Interstate 45, Spring, Texas (the “Property”).


 


Assignee hereby agrees to and shall assume, perform and be fully responsible for the performance of all of the obligations of Assignor under the Purchase Agreement.


 


All of the provisions, covenants and agreements contained in the Assignment shall extend to and be binding upon the respective legal representatives, successors and assigns of Assignor and Assignee. This Assignment represents the entire agreement between Assignor and Assignee with respect to the subject matter of the Assignment, and all prior or contemporaneous agreements regarding such matters are hereby rendered null and void and of no force and effect.


 


(SIGNATURES APPEARS ON FOLLOWING PAGE)






  





  











  













WITNESS THE EXECUTION HEREOF, as of this April 12, 2012.


 


 




	  	  	

ASSIGNOR:




	  	  	  
	 	 	 MOODY NATIONAL COMPANIES, LP, 

a Texas limited partnership


	  	  	
By:

	
/s/ Brett Moody


	  	  	
Name:

	Brett Moody 
	  	  	
Title:

	Managing Member







 



	 	 	


ASSIGNEE:






	 	 	 
	 	 	
MOODY NATIONAL WOOD-HOU HOLDING, LLC


an Delaware limited liability company


	 	 	
By:

	
/s/ Brett Moody 


	 	 	
Name:

	Brett Moody 
	 	 	
Title:

	President
#### Ova v. Oakland Homes

2016 MT 296N

DA 16-0189

11/15/16

Affirmed

Dist. 13 (Yellowstone)
EXHIBIT 10(A)



 Exhibit 10(a) 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of Additional
Information and to the use of our reports: (1) dated April 13, 2012, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Life Insurance Company, and (2) dated April 16, 2012, with respect to the financial
statements of the subaccounts of Separate Account VA X, included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 23 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-125817) under the Securities Act of 1933 and related Prospectus of Flexible Premium Variable Annuity
- I. 
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
 Des Moines, Iowa 
 April 16, 2012
(1) Adjusting Price $16.15 CWT

(2) Base Price $17.79 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT ($1.64)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.1410)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.0705)

Price change per quart ($0.0353)

Price change per pint ($0.0176)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.0132)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.0110)

Price change per half pint ($0.0088)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.14)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.07)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.04)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.02)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.01)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.01)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.01)

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Dept. of Food and Agriculture Announcement of Minimum Prices

 Effective Date: Nov. 6, 2016
**Exhibit 34.16**

**KATZ**

**SAPPER**

**& MILLER**

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

Managing Member 

Park Bridge Lender Services LLC 

New York, NY 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of 2017 Compliance by Park Bridge LenderServices LLC with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”), that Park Bridge Lender Services LLC (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities andExchange Commission’s Regulation AB as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, excluding those criteria determined by management and noted as not applicable (N/A) within Exhibit B to Management’s Report. The transactions coveredby this report are only those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trust advisor or operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions (the “Platform”) identified in Management’s Report. ReferenceExhibit A to Management’s Report for the transactions covered by this examination. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion onmanagement’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination. 

Our examination wasconducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Ourexamination included tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria during the specified period,and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samplesmay not have included servicing activities related to each asset backed transaction included in the Platform. An examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above orsubsequent to our tests that may have affected the Company’s servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination on the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Companycomplied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit B to Management’s Report with respect to the transactions identified in Exhibit A to Management’s Report as of and for the year ended December 31,2017, for the Platform, is fairly stated, in all material aspects. 

/s/ Katz, Sapper & Miller LLP 

New York, NY 

February 15, 2018
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-1601V

UNPUBLISHED

SILVIA STITT,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: January 5, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.

Darryl R. Wishard, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On October 15, 2019, Silvia Stitt filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that an influenza (“flu”) vaccination that she received in 

her left arm on October 3, 2017 caused a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA). Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing 

Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On January 5, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at

1. Specifically, it is Respondent’s position that Petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with 

SIRVA of the left arm and that it meets the requirements of a Table injury claim for SIRVA.

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).
2

Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that there are no other causes for Petitioner’s left arm 

injury and that she suffered the sequela of this injury for more than six months. Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1999, and the Consolidated  Statement
of  Operations  for the three  months  ended  March  31,  1999 of  Mission  West
Properties,  Inc.,  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to  such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         2,886
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         686,345
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (11,512)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 682,634
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       8
<OTHER-SE>                                     34,111
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   682,634
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               37,240
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,548
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,854
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,681
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,946
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,946
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,946
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .23




</TABLE>
No. 09-8456.

#### Issa Sanad Beiruti, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 957, 130 S. Ct. 1553,

176 L. Ed. 2d 142,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1290.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:30PM -----
To: "Higgins,Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 
From: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US 
Date: 02/09/2010 09:44PM 
cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Fred Talcott/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael 
Horowitz/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Larry Sorrels/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy 
Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 
Subject: revised RICE preamble/rule and RIA
Hi Cortney,
How is the weather?  Have you gotten a lot more snow?  Attached is the revised RICE 
preamble/rule (clean and redline) and RIA.  
 
 
Melanie King 
Energy Strategies Group 
Sector Policies and Programs Division 
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 
 
Mail Code D243-01 
RTP, NC  27711 
 
Phone:  (919) 541-2469 
Fax:       (919) 541-5450 
king.melanie@epa.gov
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with
the annual report of Senmiao Technology Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2018, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Xin Chen, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: June 29, 2018 |  |  | /s/ Xin Chen                  | 
|------------------- |  |  | ----------------------------- | 
|                    |  |  | Xin Chen                      | 
|                    |  |  | Chief Executive Officer       | 
|                    |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer) |
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF AKI, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         802
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  29,530
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,005
<INVENTORY>                                    9,555
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               39,867
<PP&E>                                         27,918
<DEPRECIATION>                                 11,126
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 229,591
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          16,699
<BONDS>                                        122,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     84,759
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   229,591
<SALES>                                        31,630
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               31,630
<CGS>                                          18,825
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  18,825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               45
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,442
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,364
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,780
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,584
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,584
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132276 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132276 COA: 271516 Genesee CC: 05-016202-FC AARON JERROD LLOYD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 23, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1218 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 29, 2006

Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

GEORGE E. MICHAEL

v.

JUDITH STOCK 

v.

COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE 

INSURANCE COMPANY AND EDWARD 

J. MORRIS, ESQUIRE 

v.

TOHICKON ABSTRACT COMPANY

PETITION OF: COMMONWEALTH LAND 

TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY AND 

EDWARD J. MORRIS, ESQUIRE

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 492 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

GEORGE E. MICHAEL

v.

JUDITH STOCK 

v.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 493 MAL 2017

Cross Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

JUDITH STOCK GEORGE E. MICHAEL JUDITH STOCK
[492 MAL 2017 and 493 MAL 2017] - 2 

COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE 

INSURANCE COMPANY AND EDWARD 

J. MORRIS, ESQUIRE 

v.

TOHICKON ABSTRACT COMPANY

CROSS PETITION OF: JUDITH STOCK

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 28th day of December, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED. 

GEORGE E. MICHAEL
GTP Contract Delivery Requirements

Fill Rate (FR)

CAT CONUS OCONUS FMS

SRT*

CONUS OCONUS

1 2 2 1 1 1

2 3 3 2 1 1

3 6 6 3 1 1

TDD

- Days in Table above reflect calendar days 

- SRT (Hours) are specific to Navy Orders for designated NSNs

CAT CONUS OCONUS FMS SRT* (Hours)

CONUS OCONUS

1 4 4 1 48 96

2 7 7 2 48 96

3 11 11 3 48 96
# C_2016034EN.01000301.xml

| 29.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/3

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/111, concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia apply

(2016/C 34/04)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 (2), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/111 (3).

2

3

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 101/2011, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/111.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (4).

4

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 31, 5.2.2011, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 23, 29.1.2016, p. 1.

3

(4)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

4

---
# Nomenclature

# B1

# B2

# B3

# B4

# B5

# B6

# B7

# D1

# D2

# D3

# D4

# D5

# D6

# D7

# D8

# D9

# D10

# D11

# D12

# D13

# D14

# D15

# D16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0107

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SHANE THOMPSON FREIBURG,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 21, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 14 2022

11/14/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0107