alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 38 (Friday, February 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 8930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4178]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ID-5975-000]


Currin, Earl C., Jr.; Notice of Filing

February 20, 2009.
    Take notice that on February 13, 2009, Earl C. Currin, Jr. 
submitted for filing, an application for authority to hold interlocking 
positions, pursuant to section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act, 16 
U.S.C. 825d(b) (2008), Part 45 of Title 18 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations, 18 CFR Part 45 (2008), and Commission Order No. 664 
(2005).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dc9a998e9f93b2b0b5b2b98fa9acacb3aea89cbab9aebff2bbb3aa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6d2b283f2e2203010403083e181d1d021f192d0b081f0e430a021b">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 6, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-4178 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 4265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-2073]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1198-DR]


Maine; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Maine, (FEMA-1198-DR), dated January 13, 1998, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 15, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Maine, is hereby amended to include the following area among those 
areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe 
declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of 
January 13, 1998:

    Aroostook County for Individual Assistance and Public 
Assistance.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
Dennis H. Kwiatkowski,
Deputy Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-2073 Filed 1-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4663 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4663

 To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to reimburse 
   States for expenditures associated with the implementation of the 
   Medicare prescription drug benefit for dual eligible individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2006

 Mr. Bradley of New Hampshire introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to reimburse 
   States for expenditures associated with the implementation of the 
   Medicare prescription drug benefit for dual eligible individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF STATE REIMBURSEMENT FOR EXPENDITURES 
              ASSOCIATED WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MEDICARE 
              PRESCRIPTION DRUG BENEFIT FOR DUAL ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUALS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 1935(d) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396u-5(d)) or any other provision of law, with 
respect to covered part D drugs (as defined in section 1860D-2(e) of 
such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-102(e)) for full-benefit dual eligible 
individuals (as defined in section 1935(c)(6) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
1396u-5(c)(6)) who are enrolled in a prescription drug plan under part 
D of title XVIII of such Act (or an MA-PD plan under part C of such 
title), the Secretary of Health and Human Services is authorized to 
fully reimburse a State (as defined for purposes of title XIX of such 
Act) for the costs described in subsection (b).
    (b) Costs Described.--For purposes of subsection (a), costs 
described in this subsection are costs incurred by the State as a 
result of the implementation of any program, with respect to access to 
covered part D drugs for individuals described in subsection (a), that 
is consistent with the guidance to States issued by the Centers of 
Medicare & Medicaid on January 14, 2006, titled ``Transitional State--
Part D Plan Coordination of Benefits'', without regard to the date of 
implementation of the program or the duration of the program. Such 
costs include copayments made on behalf of such individuals, 
administrative costs, and costs associated with disputed claim 
reconciliation.
                                 <all>
```
#### David N. Shank, *Appellant,*v. Will Stanley, et al, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed March 10, 1926.

*O. P. Dickinson,*for Appellant;

*E. W. & 11. C. Davis,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

AUG 13, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-12299

________________________

AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, 

f.k.a. Cingular Wireless LLC, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR 

STOCK CAR AUTO RACING, INC., 

Defendant-Appellant,

SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, 

Intervenor-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

O R D E R:

Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, CARNES and FAY, Circuit Judges.
2

The parties are hereby advised that the court is issuing its opinion in this

expedited case today. Any petitions for rehearing shall be filed in the clerk’s

office no later than five days from today. The parties are reminded that under the

provisions of Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-3 entitled “Extraordinary Nature of

Petitions for En Banc Consideration”:

Alleged errors in a panel’s determination of

state law . . . are matters for rehearing

before the panel but not for en banc

consideration.

Please govern yourselves accordingly. 

The court will continue to expedite its consideration of this case.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

In connection with the Form 10-Q (the "Report") of Anthony & Sylvan Pools
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003, I, Stuart D.
Neidus, certify that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  August 14, 2003




                                        ANTHONY & SYLVAN POOLS CORPORATION


                                        By: /s/ Stuart D. Neidus
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Stuart D. Neidus,
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

EVERETT PEARSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D23-2020

December 20, 2023

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Manatee County; Stephen Mathew Whyte, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SLEET, C.J., and SMITH and LABRIT, JJ., Concur. 

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Montana Seventh Judicial District Court. County of Dawson.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- DONALD OLMSTEAD, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-14-107

ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCE REVIEW HEARING

On February 9, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to the Montana State Prison for twenty-five (25) years, with no time suspended, for the offense of Sexual Intercourse Without Consent, a felony, in violation of §45-5-503, MCA. The sentence was ordered to run consecutively to the sentence imposed in Dawson County Cause No. DC-13-104. The Defendant was ordered to register as a Sexual Offender and was designated as a Tier III Sex Offender. Prior to parole, Defendant was ordered to complete Phases I and II of Sex Offender Treatment. The Defendant was not given credit for time served in jail prior to sentencing since he was already in jail for Cause No. DC-13-104. Defendant was ordered to pay $70 in court fees, $50 for prep of PSI, and $800 for cost of assigned counsel.

On May 5, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was scheduled to be heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Jennifer Streano of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the application, Jennifer Streano of the Public Defender’s *53Office requested that Mr. Olmstead’s sentence review hearing be continued to the August hearings to have additional time to prepare for the hearing.

Done in open Court this 5th day of May, 2016.

DATED this 10th day of June, 2016.

It is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the application for review of sentence is CONTINUED to the next available hearings in August 2016. Notification will be sent to interested parties four weeks prior providing the actual time and date of the hearing.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member.
FAA Case No. 2012NM710034
Federal AviationAdministration Office ofthe ChiefCounsel 800 Independence Avenue, SW. Washington, DC 20591 Respondent, Federal Aviation Administration Office ofthe Regional Counsel (ANM-7) Northwest Mountain Region Headquarters 1601 Lind Avenue, SW. Renton, WA 98057-3356
v. Appellant, Global Arms and Ammunition David Carl Williams, President

28- 37th StreetN.E., Suite A Auburn, Washington 98002

BRIEF OF APPELLANT 

# RECE\VED JUN 06 20\4 

## HEARING DOCKET

David Carl Williams (ProSe) 28- 37th StreetN.E., Suite A

Auburn, Washington 98002I. ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR A. The FAA failed to properly serve Global Arms and Ammunition pursuant to §13.211. B. The FAA erred in denying Global Arms and Ammunition's request for a hearing. Ul. FACTS AND ARGUMENT I. THE FAA FAILED TO PROPERLY SERVE GLOBAL ARMS AND AMMUNITION Under the Federal Aviation Regulations, section 13.211, each party must be served. Althoughthe Notice ofProposed Civil Penalty wasproperly addressed to Global Arm and Ammunition (herein "Global Arms"), itwas givento Mr. Allion Brewer who is not an employee ofGlobal Arms. Mr. Brewer shares office space with Global Arms but does not work for Global Arms and does not have authorityto represent Global Arms in any capacity. Global Arms was never notified ofthe Notice and on its own initiative discovered it. Therefore, because service was notmade to Global Arms or its employee, itwas improper. II. THE FAAERRED IN DENYING GLOBAL ARMS AND AMMUNITION'S REQUEST FORA HEARING. Global Arms attempted 

### to request a hearing promptly after itbecame aware ofthe pending civil penalty. However, the FAA deniedthe request, stating that the time allotted for requesting a hearing had expired. The Notice specifically gives Global Arms 15 days to request a hearing, but because proper service was notmade to Global Arms, itwas deprived ofthis right. Therefore, because Global could not obtain a hearing, it was deprived ofa fair opportunity to explain the circumstances that leadto the FAA's investigation and proposed civil penalty.IV. RELIEF REQUESTED For the above reasons, Global Arms and Ammunitionrequestthat the FAA grant its request for a hearing to explainthe mitigating circumstances that lead to the FAA investigation andthe Order Proposing Civil Penalty.
Respectfully submitted this 29th day ofMay 2014.

David Carl Williams (Pro Se) Global Arms and AmmunitionFAA Case No. 2012NM710034 Global Arms and Ammunition David Carl Williams, President 28 -37th Street N.E., Suite A Auburn, Washington 98002 NOTICE OF APPEAL

Appeal from Order Assessing Civil Penalty Notice is hereby giventhat Global Arms and Ammunition, appeals the OrderAssessing Civil Penalty of$50,000 in reference to the above case issued by the Federal Aviation Administration's Northwest Mountain Regional Office. Appellant**alleges\).rrorinthlO~ul~** ordermade without formal hearing. ( 

# it!JJJ1Jmfflitlfi11J! /
···**~:~~:;;;.;;?_::;;;c:cc~~o<~u_f'**

DATED: May 29, 2014**·~····~· ~~:'-=---::-::=c----=--:::-::­**  David Carl Williams (Pro Se) Global Arms and Ammunition
11 July 2014 ***********************

NSN: 8940-01-578-8895 (TCK) * MONOGRAPH M4M4

 *********************** 

Item: Toasted corn kernels, Plain, salted (Type VI, Flavor 1)

Document: A-A-20195, Snack Foods and PKG&QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 265 Component Classification: Primary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Bright to moderate golden yellow color with fine grain salt on the surface.

Odor: Toasted corn.

Flavor: Toasted corn, salty, slight oil.

Texture: Crispy, lightly crunchy but not hard.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkened color.

Odor: Stale/ rancid, scorched or other non-typical odor.

Flavor: Stale/ rancid, scorched or other non-typical flavor.

Texture: Soft, not firm and crunchy, extremely hard.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

This product should contain an oxygen scavenger. If defects such as oxidized or rancid odors or flavors 

exist, they are likely due to package failure or the absence of an oxygen scavenger.
Executive Order 13504

# Amending Executive Order 13390

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 5121-5206), and in order to extend the work of the Coordinator of Federal Support for the Recovery and Rebuilding of the Gulf Coast Region, Executive Order 13390 of November 1, 2005, as amended, is further amended by striking “February 28, 2009” and inserting in lieu thereof “September 30, 2009”.

[FR Doc. E9-4103

Billing code 3195-W9-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4805 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4805

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 2006

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 105 North Quincy Street in Clinton, Illinois, as the ``Gene Vance 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 105 
North Quincy Street in Clinton, Illinois, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Gene Vance Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Gene Vance Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 28, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 24, 2009)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 8431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4103]



[[Page 8429]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part III





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Executive Order 13504--Amending Executive Order 13390


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 24, 2009 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 8431]]

                Executive Order 13504 of February 20, 2009

                
Amending Executive Order 13390

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 
                Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended (42 
                U.S.C. 5121-5206), and in order to extend the work of 
                the Coordinator of Federal Support for the Recovery and 
                Rebuilding of the Gulf Coast Region, Executive Order 
                13390 of November 1, 2005, as amended, is further 
                amended by striking ``February 28, 2009'' and inserting 
                in lieu thereof ``September 30, 2009''.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    February 20, 2009.

[FR Doc. E9-4103
Filed 2-23-09; 11:15 am]
Billing code 3195-W9-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 11, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-30662

Summary Calendar

 

EMMA W. MCDONALD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-CV-1326

--------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Appellant Emma McDonald brought discrimination claims

against Appellee Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. McDonald

filed her lawsuit on the last day before the limitations period

for her claims expired. McDonald did not have service made on

Appellee. Under threat of dismissal for failure to prosecute she

ultimately had service made. McDonald did not appear for a

noticed deposition. There were no objections filed to the
notice. Counsel for Appellee traveled to the out of state

deposition only to be subjected to McDonald’s failure to appear. 

McDonald was then ordered to appear for deposition. She did not

appear although aware of the order to appear for deposition. 

McDonald now complains of the dismissal of her claim for failure

to comply with the court’s orders. We find no merit in her

claims that the district court abused its discretion in

dismissing her claims. The record reflects a willful and

intentional disregard of required appearances for depositions in

McDonald’s own lawsuit. No abuse has been shown. We find her

argument meritless and her authority inapposite. The judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED.
No. 11M61.

#### Amy Kathleen Smith, et vir, Petitioners v. ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 1176, 132 S. Ct. 1160,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1015,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 958.

January 23, 2012.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.

Same case below, 434 Fed. Appx. 454.