alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jim Russell, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division A.

Opinion Filed February 26, 1926.

*C. P. Diamond,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*J. B. Johnson,*Attorney General, and J. B. Gaines, Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

— Jim Russell, a negro, was indicted for the murder of. P. D. Williams in Taylor County on December 16, 1924, and was tried and convicted of murder in the first degree on June 26, 1925. He seeks a reversal of the judgment upon writ of error.

There are several assignments of error based upon objections made by the state attorney and sustained to questions propounded to witnesses by defendant’s counsel, but the principal point presented in this case is the assignment which challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.

The evidence in the case, which is presented by a bill of exceptions which sets it out both in narrative form and in the form of questions and answers, is clearly insufficient to sustain the charge of murder in the first degree.

*371Our consideration of the evidence leads us to the conclusion reached by the Attorney General expressed in the brief submitted by him in this case, viz: that “the conclusion is inescapable that the verdict returned was based upon or largely influenced by something outside the evidence/ ‘

It is unnecessary to repeat the evidence in substance further than to say that the bill of exceptions discloses that the defendant shot and killed the deceased under circumstances which not only did not show upon defendant’s part a premeditated design to kill the deceased, but which did not show the killing to have been unlawful.

The defendant arose about daylight on the morning of December 16, 1924, to go to his work. There was a heavy fog and in the early morning light objects were indistinct. As the defendant was leaving his door he saw an object which seemed to be crouching just outside the fence. The defendant re-entered the house, procured a pistol and left the house by another door, as if to evade what he had seen. As he left the house he was hailed by the deceased, who ordered the defendant to approach him. The deceased then told the defendant that he had come to collect eight dollars then or take the defendant’s life. After some parley over the alleged debt the deceased asked the defendant if he had said his prayers for he was. going to kill him and with that declaration drew a pistol and leveled it on the defendant, who shot and killed the aggressor.

The defendant then gave himself up to the authorities and voluntarily told them of the transaction.

There was no evidence in contradiction of the defendant’s account of the transaction, but upon the other hand several circumstances brought out by the state were corroborative of it. See Holton v. State, 87 Fla. 65, 99 South. Rep. 244; Smithie v. State, 84 Fla. 498, 94 South. Rep. 156.

The judgment is reversed.

*372Brown, C. J., and Ellis and Strum, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell, J., concur in the Opinion.

Buford, J., disqualified.
No. 11-8025.

#### Alfonso Allan Brooks, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1185, 132 S. Ct. 1160,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 982.

181 L. Ed. 2d 1030,

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
1 March 2011 ************************** 

NSN: 8920-01-583-4838 (OAC) * MONOGRAPH NO: 5A1 

 ************************** 

Item: Oatmeal, Apple Cinnamon 

Document: PCR-O-007, Oatmeal, Apple Cinnamon, Packaged in a Polymeric Tray, Shelf Stable 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 190 Component Classification: Primary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F 

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Oatmeal: cooked whole oats and groats, tan to light brown color. 

Apples: cooked, uniform slices, off white to tan color. 

Odor: Cooked oatmeal, apples, and cinnamon. 

Flavor: Cooked oatmeal, apples, and cinnamon. 

Texture: Oatmeal: slightly soft to slightly firm. 

Apples: soft to slightly firm. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Oats: darkened. 

Apple slices: slightly darkened tan color, mushy. 

Odor: Pungent to sour. 

Flavor: Pungent to sour. ` 

Texture: Oats: thick. 

Apples: overly soft to mushy. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA 

Special Notes

NA
# C_2016214EN.01002202.xml

| 15.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 214/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 214/22

---

Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

(2016/C 214/06)

Pursuant to the second indent of Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

1

2

On page 69, in the explanatory note to CN subheading ‘1211 90 86 Other’ the following text is inserted between point 5 and the last sentence:

On page 69, in the explanatory note to CN subheading ‘1211 90 86 Other

| ‘6. | Seed husks of Psyllium (Plantago ovata) in the form of heterogeneous fragments, obtained by threshing.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘6.

Seed husks of Psyllium (Plantago ovata) in the form of heterogeneous fragments, obtained by threshing.’

Plantago ovata

On page 71, the following text is inserted between the explanatory note to CN subheading ‘1302 20 10 and 1302 20 90 Pectic substances, pectinates and pectates’ and the explanatory note to CN subheading ‘1302 31 00 Agar-agar’:

On page 71, the following text is inserted between the explanatory note to CN subheading ‘1302 20 10 and 1302 20 90 Pectic substances, pectinates and pectates

1302 31 00 Agar-agar

| ‘1302 31 00


  to


  1302 39 00 | Mucilages and thickeners, whether or not modified, derived from vegetable products

  As long as a product either swells in cold water or dissolves in hot water, the mentioned criteria of the HS Explanatory Note to heading 1302 , (C), first paragraph, are fulfilled.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘1302 31 00

to

1302 39 00

Mucilages and thickeners, whether or not modified, derived from vegetable products

As long as a product either swells in cold water or dissolves in hot water, the mentioned criteria of the HS Explanatory Note to heading 1302 , (C), first paragraph, are fulfilled.’

On page 71, in the Explanatory Note to CN subheading ‘1302 39 00 Other’ the following text is inserted after point 4:

On page 71, in the Explanatory Note to CN subheading ‘1302 39 00 Other

| ‘5. | Hydrocolloids extracted from seed husks of Psyllium (Plantago ovata).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘5.

Hydrocolloids extracted from seed husks of Psyllium (Plantago ovata).’

Plantago ovata

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 76, 4.3.2015, p. 1.

2

---
Se nt By: ErA; 202 - 364-3771 ; Sep-18 - 06 12 4 0PM; 

... -.. --,. _ ... ,.-,.1 ....... I'J, .. VV\l 1'. 1' ~JYI r-.a9ral }WllltJon ~ClfT\I" ~16-80~~3 ' ~ 

MAY-19-2005 11:33 i7lS 5687 P. e4 

.; ~ , :.<.~' ,~ . 

The co~tion of tbill buildinJ will no( only dect'C3lc.air ari:ty au! , •• met LaGua- arrivals 

and depanutea, but Wo may IlIO I1d.vcr&llyimp~ the: New York City a;onomy aM ~ t air 

tramc nationwic18. For thale mUOl'lI, the FAA mult dccwi Lbl.a "uil<Un; J. huatd to 

naviption_ 

Wtl3l'e 3vsilable ro ~s those !ton\! in more detail should)'otl deem.ir necessary. 

SiccClfcly, 

Tom Book 

GmmJ Mataltr far Ampa.c;e Modcmiution, 

Technology &! Opetltional Buh.xl~mt 

u: Community Bom! #7 

Patty Omit, N8\Y YO(k City Economio !)evalopmant Corporation 

Pa ge 3 / 3 

p.03 

O!/19/2005 :20~M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 150 (Wednesday, August 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 41852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20843]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Security for the Protection of the Public Indemnification of 
Passengers for Nonperformance of Transportation; Notice of Issuance of 
Certificate (Performance)

    Notice is hereby given that the following have been issued a 
Certificate of Financial Responsibility for Indemnification of 
Passengers for Nonperformance of Transportation pursuant to the 
provisions of Section 3, Pub. L. 89-777 (46 U.S.C. 817(e)) and the 
Federal Maritime Commission's implementing regulations at 46 CFR Part 
540, as amended:

Corporacion Ferries del Caribe, Inc., d/b/a Ferries del Caribe), Calle 
Concorida, #249 Altos Mayaguez, Puerto Rico 00680
Vessel: Regal Voyager

Cunard Line Limited and Cunard White Star Ltd., 6100 Blue Lagoon Drive, 
#400, Miami, FL 33126
Vessels: Queen Elizabeth 2, Royal Viking Sun, Sea Goddess I, Sea 
Goddess II and Vistafjord

Disney Cruise Vacations, Inc. and Magical Cruise Company Limited, 210 
Celebration Place, Suite 400, Celebration, FL 34747-4600
Vessel: Disney Magic

Ivaran Lines Limited, Newport Financial Center, 111 Pavonia Avenue, 
Jersey City, NJ 07310-1755
Vessel: Americana

New Commodore Cruise Lines Limited, 4000 Hollywood Blvd., #385, South 
Hollywood, FL 33130-3097
Vessel: Enchanted Capri

Radisson Seven Seas Cruises, Inc., 600 Corporate Drive, Suite 410, Fort 
Lauderdale, FL 33334
Vessel: Blue Seas

Radisson Seven Seas Cruises, Inc. and Services et Transports Tahiti, 
600 Corporate Drive, Suite #410, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33334
Vessel: Paul Gauguin

Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., 1050 Caribbean Way, Miami, FL 33132-2096
Vessel: Project Eagle I

Society Expeditions, Inc., Society Expenditions GmbH and Discoverer 
Reederei Gmbh, 2001 Western Avenue, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98121
Vessel: World Discoverer

State of Alaska, c/o Alaska Marine Highway System, P.O. Box 25535, 
Juneau, AK 99802-5535
Vessel: Kennicott

    Dated: July 30, 1998.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20843 Filed 8-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
A-A-CID-55095

ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3329 STANDARD 20.46 -1.92 -10.57

Tolerance

1 1

FULL BLUEGREEN LIMIT 21.49 -2.56 -11.59 1.03 -0.64 -1.02 1.03

2 2

THIN BLUE 

LIMIT 21.43 -2.47 -11.30 0.97 -0.55 -0.73 0.85

3 3 BLUE LIMIT 21.03 -2.58 -11.16 0.57 -0.66 -0.59 0.87

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

DLA/NAVY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT June 22, 2020

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, TWILL, 65% POLYESTER/35% COTTON

Shade Number BLUE 3329 Piece/Roll Number 18320
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Morgan Stanley Charter Welton L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       5,376,618
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,740,480<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,149,128<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,149,128<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             (405,344)<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,511
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (448,855)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (448,855)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (448,855)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include subscriptions receivable of $2,753,022, interest 
receivable of $20,478 and net options premiums of $(33,020).
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $32,030.
<F3>Liabilities include accrued brokerage fees of $33,842 and accrued
management fee of $9,669.
<F4>Total revenue includes realized trading revenue of $(457,852), net
change in unrealized of $32,030 and interest income of $20,478.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
SEC Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>      0001063761
<NAME>     Simon Property Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              117,921
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       229,324<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          0<F2>
<PP&E>                                           12,860,331
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1,182,869
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   14,076,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     0<F2>
<BONDS>                                           8,845,110
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                         541,511
<COMMON>                                                 18
<OTHER-SE>                                        2,638,280
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     14,076,463<F3>
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    476,192
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       265,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      2,131
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  158,684
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      72,033
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  72,033
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       (440)
<CHANGES>                                          (12,342)
<NET-INCOME>                                         38,113
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.17
<FN>
<F1> Receivables are stated net of allowances.
<F2> The Registrant does not report using a classified balance sheet.
<F3> Includes limited partners' interest in the SPG Operating Partnership of
     $957,164; limited partners' preferred interest of $149,885; and preferred
     stock of subsidiary of $339,665.
</FN>


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40708 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DANNY RAY WHITE, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4-96-CR-4-ALL

- - - - - - - - - - February 19, 1997 Before SMITH, DUHE’ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Danny Ray White appeals from his convictions and sentence for attempting to manufacture and manufacturing methamphetamine, attempting to manufacture and manufacturing amphetamine, possession of a three-neck round-bottom flask, and possession of ethyl ether, a listed chemical. He argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions, that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress, that the district courtNo. 96-40708 - 2 - abused its discretion by denying his motion for a mistrial, and that the district court erred by imposing a fine. Based upon the testimony presented at trial, the jury could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that White committed the offenses with which he was charged. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government and drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of the verdict, the evidence is sufficient to support White’s convictions. See United States v. Martinez , 975 F.2d 159, 160-61 (5th Cir. 1992), cert. denied , 507 U.S. 943 (1993). Further, the affidavit upon which the search warrant was based was sufficient to establish probable cause. See United States v. McKeever , 906 F.2d 129, 132 (5th Cir. 1990), cert. denied , 498 U.S. 1070 (1991). Because White failed to show that a witness’s reference to a rubber stopper seized from White’s vehicle was so prejudicial that it had a substantial impact upon the jury’s verdict, the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying White’s motion for a mistrial. See United States v. Ramirez , 963 F.2d 693, 699 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 506 U.S. 944 (1992). Finally, because White failed to shoulder his burden of showing that he was unable to pay, the district court did not err by imposing a fine. See United States v. Altamirano , 11 F.3d 52, 53-54 (5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
No. 11-707.

#### William E. Ruhaak, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

565 U.S. 1158, 132 S. Ct. 1117,

181 L. Ed. 2d 981,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 884.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 530.
(1) Adjusting Price $19.34 CWT

(2) Base Price $19.85 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT ($0.51)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.0439)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.0219)

Price change per quart ($0.0110)

Price change per pint ($0.0055)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.0041)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.0034)

Price change per half pint ($0.0027)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.04)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.02)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.01)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.01)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.00)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.00)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.00)

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Dept. of Food and Agriculture Announcement of Minimum Prices

 Effective Date: March 3, 2013
Provisional 11/16

NSN: 

*************************

*MONOGRAPH NO: 

M7FP

*************************

(ONS)

Item:

Beverage bases (Powdered), Sweetened with nutritive sweetener, Orange, Fortified with 

ascorbic acid and enhanced with maltodextrin, (Type II, Flavor 1, Formulation e)

Document: CID A-A-20098, Beverage Bases (Powdered) and PKG&QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 130 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Dehydrated product: Uniformly blended, free flowing, and a homogenous dry mixture 

free of hard lumps. Granulation can vary from fine powder to small agglomerated 

crystals.

Rehydrated product: Bright orange, sediment free, clear to slightly cloudy.

Odor: Rehydrated product: Distinct orange, sweet and sour.

Flavor: Rehydrated product: Distinct orange, sweet and sour.

Texture: Dehydrated product: Free of hard lumps.

Rehydrated product: Fully dissolve within two minutes with constant stirring.

Possible Deteriorative Changes

Appearance: Rehydrated: Coagulated, jelled, surface frothing, or cloudiness, excessive sediment 

significantly affecting aesthetic appearance or flavor.

Odor: Burnt, scorched, moldy/mildew.

Flavor: Oxidized or any other flavor not typical of the type of beverage.

Texture: Lumpy or caked, not free flowing.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Prepare beverage IAW package instructions. Product should dissolve completely within about two 

minutes.

Special Notes
Provisional 11/16

NSN: 

*************************

*MONOGRAPH NO: 

M7FP

*************************

(ONS)

If slight sedimentation and clouding are observed but the odor and flavor are normal, do not score the 

sedimentation as a defect during surveillance inspection; make note of it in the narrative for future use. 

Coagulation/gelation may occur if the original formulation was incorrect or if the product has been 

temperature abused for a long time. Coagulation / gelation results in clumps of granules that do not 

readily dissolve when product is reconstituted. Particles tend to float in suspension (look like gel pockets 

or tapioca granules that are clumped together).
No. 11-7809.

#### Moises Garcia, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1170, 132 S. Ct. 1124,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1002,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 633.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 655 F.3d 426.
Doing Business with DLA Land and Maritime webinar

Email this event to me @

Invalid Email Address!Invalid Email Address!

Start Date/Time:

Wednesday, July 10, 2024 1:30 PM

End Date/Time:

Wednesday, July 10, 2024 2:30 PM

Recurring Event:

One time event

Importance:

Normal Priority

Category:

Presentation

Location:

Virtual/Online

Description:

DLA Land & Maritime (L&M) is the land and maritime supply chain manager for DLA and is headquartered in Columbus, Ohio. L&M provides land weapon systems and maritime weapon systems support to the defense community and other governmental customers.

DLA Land and Maritime procures:

### Land

                        - Wheeled Vehicle Components 
                        - Tracked Vehicle Components 
                        - Specialized Batteries 
                        - Nuts and Washers 
                        - Converters 

## Maritime

                        - Valves / Hardware 
                        - Fluid Handling 
                        - Electronics 
                        - Motors 
                        - Packing / Gaskets 

Registration in advance is required to participate at:

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJItd-GhpjMpHVQtRgTjWNbIBLrGc2OydSk

 

 

Enrolled Users:

Alandra Jones

                - Return
                - 
                - Export