alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-Q of  Mission  West
Properties,  Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly  period ended March 31, 2007
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  each of Carl E.  Berg,  Chairman  of the Board  and Chief  Executive
Officer of the Company, Raymond V. Marino, President and Chief Operating Officer
of the Company and Wayne N. Pham,  Vice  President of Finance and  Controller of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss.  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  to the best of his  knowledge,
that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/ Carl E. Berg
---------------------------------------
Carl E. Berg
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
May 8, 2007

/s/ Raymond V. Marino
---------------------------------------
Raymond V. Marino
President and Chief Operating Officer
May 8, 2007

/s/ Wayne N. Pham
---------------------------------------
Wayne N. Pham
Vice President of Finance and Controller
May 8, 2007

This  certification   accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  or  otherwise  required,  be  deemed  filed by the
Company  for  purposes  of ss. 18 of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
amended.
# C_2016386EN.01001801.xml

| 20.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 386/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 386/18

---

Notice concerning a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU

Request made by a Contracting Entity — extension of deadline

(2016/C 386/11)

On 2 February 2016 the Commission received a request in accordance with Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement procedures by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (1). The first working day following receipt of the request is 3 February 2016.

1

This request is made by Vapo Oy and concerns activities relating to the exploitation of a geographical area for the purposes of extracting fuel peat on the territory of Finland. The relevant notice was published on page 9 of OJ C 96 on 11 March 2016. A prolongation notice was published on page 25 of the OJ C 301 of 19 August 2016.

Pursuant to Annex IV, point 2 of Directive 2014/25/EU, the Commission may require the Member State or the applicant or the independent national authority competent or any other competent national authority to provide all necessary information or to supplement or clarify information given within the appropriate time limit. On 7 June 2016 the Commission asked the Finnish authorities to provide additional information by 28 June 2016.

Pursuant to Annex IV, point 2, second phrase of Directive 2014/25/EU in case of late or incomplete answers to the Commission’s request for clarification or for the additional information, the deadlines, shall be suspended for the period between the expiry of the time limit set in the request for information and the receipt of the complete and correct information. The reply of the Finnish authorities was received on 26 September 2016. The final deadline is therefore 23 January 2017.

---

(1)  OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243.

1

---
No. 11-7070.

#### Darrell Williams, Petitioner v. Anthony Padula, Warden.

565 U.S. 1122, 132 S. Ct. 1024,

181 L. Ed. 2d 755,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 329.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 439 Fed. Appx. 269.
No. 11-7521.

#### Cycle Lee Tyler, Petitioner v. Michael Arellano, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 1167, 132 S. Ct. 1115,

181 L. Ed. 2d 996,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 846.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 681.
First Amendment to the Hawker Beechcraft Savings and Investment Plan



 Exhibit 10.16.7 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
 HAWKER BEECHCRAFT SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN 
 This First Amendment to the Hawker
Beechcraft Savings and Investment Plan is made this 15th day of December, 2011. 
 WHEREAS, Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (the
“Company”) maintains the Hawker Beechcraft Savings and Investment Plan (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company has
reserved the right to amend the Plan. 
 NOW, THEREFORE in consideration of the foregoing premises, effective August 8, 2011,
Section 4.03 of the Plan is amended to read as follows: 
 Section 4.03. Employer Matching Contribution. Subject
to the terms and conditions hereinafter provided, the Employer will make a matching contribution for each eligible Participant (as defined in Article II) as follows: 
 For each eligible participant who is covered under the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement, the matching contribution will be as follows: (i) prior to August 8, 2011, an amount equal to
100% of the first 4% of Compensation contributed by such Participant as an elective before-tax or after-tax contribution pursuant to Section 4.04 and (ii) on or after August 8, 2011, an amount equal to 50% of the first 4% of the
compensation contributed by such Participant as an elective before-tax or after-tax contribution pursuant to Section 4.04. 

Effective October 4, 2010, the matching contribution for all other eligible participants will be equal to 50% of the first 4% of
Compensation contributed by such Participant as an elective before-tax or after-tax contribution pursuant to Section 4.04. 

Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no Participant will accrue or be entitled to any matching contribution hereunder unless
and until such contribution is contributed to the Trust. 
 The amount of the Employer Matching Contribution for each eligible
individual Participant will be determined based on the amount or percentage contributed as a salary reduction contribution for each pay period and not on the total percentage contributed throughout the year. 

The amount of the Employer’s matching contribution made for each Participant pursuant to Section 4.03 will be allocated to the
Participant’s Matching Account. 
 The Company reserves, by action of its governing body, the right to terminate, suspend,
or modify contributions at any time and from time to time. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the foregoing amendment is executed as of the day, month, and year first
appearing above. 
  

			
	HAWKER BEECHCRAFT CORPORATION
		
	By	 	 /s/ Rich Jiwanlal



  

	
	ATTEST:
	
	 /s/ Heather Allen
No. 09-8633.

#### Ellis Eric Evans, Petitioner v. Mildred L. Rivera, Warden.

559 U.S. 961, 130 S. Ct. 1564,

176 L. Ed. 2d 149,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1179.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 356 Fed. Appx. 635.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001067541
<NAME> HOME INTERIORS & GIFTS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          33,861
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,348
<ALLOWANCES>                                       624
<INVENTORY>                                     38,482
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,687
<PP&E>                                          60,120
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 135,409
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,616
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,523
<OTHER-SE>                                   (408,902)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   135,409
<SALES>                                        116,748
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               116,748
<CGS>                                           56,712
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   96,259
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (844)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,261
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,072
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,130
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,942
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,942
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Wiggins v. Residential Credit

2016 MT 312N

DA 16-0191

11/29/16

Affirmed

Dist. 20 (Lake)
APP B

 DSCPM 4155.2

************************

• MONOGRAPH NO.: 1C4

************************

ITEM: CHILI WITH BEANS (CWB)

NSN: 8940 01 470 3190 Polymeric Tray ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR C 034

 8940 01 470 3233 Tray Pack Can ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR C 035

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: medium to large reddish brown kidney beans; red-brown sauce;

specks of spices throughout; fine ground beef; onion pieces; sheen

ODOR: chili powder spice; thermally processed chili; cooked bean odor

FLAVOR: cooked kidney bean; slightly bitter; moderate red pepper burn;

mild to moderate heat sensation; low ground beef flavor

TEXTURE: soft/firm beans; finely ground beef; slightly oily

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36 months

 100 DEGREES F: 6 months

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

Appearance: loss of sheen; darkened chili sauce; oiling off; wrinkly

beans; thickening, thinning, or separating of sauce

Odor: loss or lack of odor; bitter tomato; thermally processed

Flavor: thermally processed; loss of spice

Texture: softening of beans; drying out of beans and meat; breaking down

of beans; grainy beef

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES:
Amendment No. 1 to Loan Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 

 
 



 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO LOAN AGREEMENT 

This Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) dated as of February 28, 2012, is between Bank of America, N.A. (the “Bank”)
and Schmitt Industries, Inc. (the “Borrower”). 
 RECITALS 

A. The Bank and the Borrower entered into a certain Loan Agreement dated as of February 13, 2009 (together with any previous amendments,
the “Agreement”). 
 B. The Bank and the Borrower desire to amend the Agreement. 

AGREEMENT 
 1. Definitions. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning given to them in the Agreement. 

2. Amendments. The Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 
 2.1 In Paragraph 1.1 (a), the amount “$1,000,000.00” is changed to “$2,000,000.00,” 
 2.2 In Paragraph 1.2, the date “March 1, 2012” is changed to “March 1, 2014”. 
 2.3 In Paragraph 4.1 (a), the ratio “.375” is changed to “.50”. 
 2.4 The following Paragraph 6.8 is hereby added: 
 “6.8 Environmental
Information. A completed Bank form Environmental Questionnaire”. 
 3. Representations and Warranties. When the Borrower
signs this Amendment, the Borrower represents and warrants to the Bank that: (a) there is no event which is, or with notice or lapse of time or both would be, a default under the Agreement except those events, if any, that have been disclosed in
writing to the Bank or waived in writing by the Bank (b) the representations and warranties in the Agreement are true as of the date of this Amendment as if made on the date of this Amendment, (c) this Amendment does not conflict with any law,
agreement, or obligation by which the Borrower is bound, and (d) if the Borrower is a business entity or a trust, this Amendment is within the Borrower’s powers, has been duly authorized, and does not conflict with any of the Borrower’s
organizational papers. 
 4. Effect of Amendment. Except as provided in this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the
Agreement, including but not limited to the Dispute Resolution Provision, shall remain in full force and effect. 
 5.
Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed an original, but all such counterparts together shall constitute but one and the same instrument. 

6. Statutory Notice. Under Oregon law, most agreements, promises and commitments made by the Bank concerning loans and
other credit extensions which are not for personal, family or household purposes or secured solely by the Borrower’s residence must be in writing, express consideration and be signed by us (Bank) to be enforceable. 

  

					
	TextBarCodeAmendment to Loan Agreemen	 	- 1 -	 	









 This Amendment is executed as of the date stated at the beginning of this Amendment. 

 

			
	Bank of America, N.A.
		
	 By:
	 	   /s/ Ross Beaton

		 	Ross Beaton, Senior Vice President
	
	BORROWER(S):
	
	Schmitt Industries, Inc.
		
	 By:
	 	   /s/ James A. Fitzhenry

		 	James A. Fitzhenry, President
		
	 By:
	 	   /s/ Jeffrey T Siegal

		 	Jeffrey T Siegal, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



  

					
	TextBarCodeAmendment to Loan Agreement	 	- 2 -
No. 09-8907.

#### Tommy Alexander, Sr., Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1017, 130 S. Ct. 1909,

176 L. Ed. 2d 384,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2554.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 353 Fed. Appx. 885.
No. 09-716.

#### Teruya Brothers, Ltd. & Subsidiaries, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

559 U.S. 939, 130 S. Ct. 1526,

176 L. Ed. 2d 114,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1247.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 580 F.3d 1038.
No. 09-683.

#### Annette Carmichael, Individually and as Guardian for Keith Carmichael, Petitioner v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Service, Inc., et al.

559 U.S. 990, 130 S. Ct. 1754,

176 L. Ed. 2d 210,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2294.

March 8, 2010.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
No. 09-8298.

#### Emmanuel Pope, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 953, 130 S. Ct. 1541,

176 L. Ed. 2d 135,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1391.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9333-9334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4485]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

[Docket ID PHMSA-97-2995]

Pipeline Safety: Random Drug Testing Rate

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), 
DOT.

ACTION: Notice of minimum annual percentage rate for random drug 
testing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: PHMSA has determined that the minimum random drug testing rate 
for covered employees will remain at 25 percent during calendar year 
2009.

[[Page 9334]]

DATES: Effective January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley Kastanas, Director, Office of 
Substance Abuse Policy, Investigations and Compliance, PHMSA, U.S. 
Department of Transportation, telephone 202-550-0629 or e-mail 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Operators of gas, hazardous liquid, and 
carbon dioxide pipelines and operators of liquefied natural gas 
facilities must select and test a percentage of covered employees for 
random drug testing. Pursuant to 49 CFR 199.105(c)(2), (3), and (4), 
the PHMSA Administrator's decision on whether to change the minimum 
annual random drug testing rate is based on the reported random drug 
test positive rate for the pipeline industry. The data considered by 
the Administrator comes from operators' annual submissions of 
Management Information System (MIS) reports required by 49 CFR 
199.119(a). If the reported random drug test positive rate is less than 
one percent, the Administrator may continue the minimum random drug 
testing rate at 25 percent. In 2007, the random drug test positive rate 
was less than one percent. Therefore, the minimum random drug testing 
rate will remain at 25 percent for calendar year 2009.
    In reference to the notice published in 70 FR 20800, PHMSA intends 
to publish an Advisory Bulletin specifying the methodology for 
reporting MIS contractor data to PHMSA. Therefore, operators must 
ensure records on contract employees continue to be maintained.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5103, 60102, 60104, 60108, 60117, and 
60118; 49 CFR 1.53.

    Issued in Washington, DC on February 23, 2009.
Alan Mayberry,
Director, Engineering and Emergency Support.
[FR Doc. E9-4485 Filed 3-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P
```
----

**EXHIBIT        32**

**Certification        of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section        1350**

| Signature                              | Title                                                       | Date                              |
|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                                   |                                                        |                              |
| /s/                  Philip H. Trenary | President                  and Chief Executive Officer      | November                  2, 2007 |
| Philip                  H. Trenary     |                                                        |                              |
|                                   |                                                        |                              |
| /s/                  Peter D. Hunt     | Vice                  President and Chief Financial Officer | November                  2, 2007 |
| Peter                  D. Hunt         |                                                        |                              |
|                                   |                                                        |                              |

----
No. 09-776.

#### Jim O’Neal Distributing, Inc., Petitioner v. One Industries, LLC.

559 U.S. 992, 130 S. Ct. 1739,

176 L. Ed. 2d 213,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2276.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 578 F.3d 1154.
No. 09-8341.

#### Larry Mack, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 954, 130 S. Ct. 1545,

176 L. Ed. 2d 137,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1178.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 344 Fed. Appx. 623.
No. 09-8477.

#### Qian Chen, Petitioner v. Ricardo S. Martinez, Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Washington.

559 U.S. 957, 130 S. Ct. 1570,

176 L. Ed. 2d 143,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1253,

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 328 Fed. Appx. 564.
No. 09-8337.

#### Rogelio Salazar-Basaldua, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 954, 130 S. Ct. 1544,

176 L. Ed. 2d 137,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1212.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 342 Fed. Appx. 985.
No. 09-804.

#### CIGNA Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Janice C. Amara, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated.

559 U.S. 990, 130 S. Ct. 1754,

176 L. Ed. 2d 210,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2318.

March 8, 2010.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 09-8228.

#### Chauncey Lamont Montague, Petitioner v. Virginia.

559 U.S. 951, 130 S. Ct. 1537,

176 L. Ed. 2d 133,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1456.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.

Same case below, 278 Va. 532, 684 S.E.2d 583.
APP B

 DSCPM 4155.2

************************

• MONOGRAPH NO.: 7B2

************************

ITEM: Soup, Instant, Chicken Noodle (SCN)

NSN: 8935-01-266-1724 ITEM SPECIFICATION: MIL-S-44283

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING:

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

 APPEARANCE: Yellow, tan powder with small thin noodles

 ODOR: Chicken, HVP, noodle.

 FLAVOR: Chicken broth/starchy/salty.

 TEXTURE: Broth, typical noodle.

 ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT 70 DEGREES F: 12 months

 80 DEGREES F: 9 months

 90 DEGREES F: 6 months

 100 DEGREES F: 4 months

EXPECTED DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

 APPEARANCE: Darkening.

 ODOR: Slightly oxidized chicken

 FLAVOR: Chicken flavor, stale.

 TEXTURE: Noodles could case harden, and possibly not reconstitute as

rapidly.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: Product should be examined in the

granulated state first, then evaluated as reconstituted product.

SPECIAL NOTES: 18 to 24 grams of product is individually packaged in a

flexible bag. Package is designed to yield an approximate serving size of 8

fluid ounces when reconstituted.