alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-7107.

#### Charles Connolly, Petitioner v. Illinois Prisoner Review Board, et al.

565 U.S. 1123, 132 S. Ct. 1027,

181 L. Ed. 2d 757,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 376.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District, denied.

Same case below, 404 Ill. App. 3d 1185, 374 Ill. Dec. 1084, 996 N.E.2d 779.
No. 11-5406.

#### Lisa Rene Kay, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 1115, 132 S. Ct. 998,

181 L. Ed. 2d 742,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 266,

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 11-6153.

#### Leon Swichkow, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1116, 132 S. Ct. 1002,

181 L. Ed. 2d 744,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 284.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 636 F.3d 1315.
No. 11-5113.

#### Marcus Deangelo Jones, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1022, 132 S. Ct. 549,

181 L. Ed. 2d 410,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8061.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
# Euroopan unionin C 402A/19.

| | ISSN 1977-1053 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 402A |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 65. vuosikerta19. lokakuuta 2022 |

ISSN 1977-1053

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 402A

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

65. vuosikerta19. lokakuuta 2022

---

| Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Ilmoitukset |
| | HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT |
| | Euroopan unionin henkilöstövalintatoimisto (EPSO) |
| 2022/C 402 A/01 | Ilmoitus, jolla muutetaan lisäystä ilmoitukseen avoimista kilpailuista – EPSO/AD/375/20 – Tanskankieliset (DA) juristi-lingvistit (AD 7), EPSO/AD/376/20 – Kreikankieliset (EL) juristi-lingvistit (AD 7), EPSO/AD/377/20 – Ranskankieliset (FR) juristi-lingvistit (AD 7), EPSO/AD/378/20 – Kroaatinkieliset (HR) juristi-lingvistit (AD 7), EPSO/AD/379/20 – Puolankieliset (PL) juristi-lingvistit (AD 7) ( EUVL C 444 A, 22.12.2020 ) | 1 |

Sisältö

Sivu

V   Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Euroopan unionin henkilöstövalintatoimisto (EPSO)

2022/C 402 A/01

Ilmoitus, jolla muutetaan lisäystä ilmoitukseen avoimista kilpailuista – EPSO/AD/375/20 – Tanskankieliset (DA) juristi-lingvistit (AD 7), EPSO/AD/376/20 – Kreikankieliset (EL) juristi-lingvistit (AD 7), EPSO/AD/377/20 – Ranskankieliset (FR) juristi-lingvistit (AD 7), EPSO/AD/378/20 – Kroaatinkieliset (HR) juristi-lingvistit (AD 7), EPSO/AD/379/20 – Puolankieliset (PL) juristi-lingvistit (AD 7) ( EUVL C 444 A, 22.12.2020 )

( EUVL C 444 A, 22.12.2020 )

1

---

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

V Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Euroopan unionin henkilöstövalintatoimisto (EPSO)

| 19.10.2022 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CA 402/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2022

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CA 402/1

---

Ilmoitus, jolla muutetaan lisäystä ilmoitukseen avoimista kilpailuista – EPSO/AD/375/20 – Tanskankieliset (DA) juristi-lingvistit (AD 7), EPSO/AD/376/20 – Kreikankieliset (EL) juristi-lingvistit (AD 7), EPSO/AD/377/20 – Ranskankieliset (FR) juristi-lingvistit (AD 7), EPSO/AD/378/20 – Kroaatinkieliset (HR) juristi-lingvistit (AD 7), EPSO/AD/379/20 – Puolankieliset (PL) juristi-lingvistit (AD 7) (1)

(
  Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti C 444 A, 22. joulukuuta 2020
  )

(2022/C 402 A/01)

Sivulla 7, lisätään kohdan 6 viimeisen alakohdan jälkeen kohta seuraavasti:

| ”7. | Poiketen siitä, mitä kohdassa 6 sanotaan, kilpailuissa EPSO/AD/376/20, EPSO/AD/377/20 ja EPSO/AD/379/20 tilanneosaamista kartoittava haastattelu järjestetään verkkokokouksena, johon osallistuu kaksi valintalautakunnan jäsentä. He haastattelevat kutakin hakijaa, tarkkailevat ja arvioivat hänen suoritustaan sekä pisteyttävät kokeen kattamat kompetenssit. Valintalautakunnan jäsenten lisäksi verkkokokouksessa ei ole läsnä haastattelijaa. Muilta osin kohtaa 6 sovelletaan sellaisenaan.” |
| --- | --- |

”7.

---

(1)  EUVL C 72 A, 5.3.2020.

1

---
No. 11-5139.

#### Darrell Nelson, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1080,

181 L. Ed. 2d 799,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 564.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 891, 132 S. Ct. 273, 181 L. Ed. 2d 162, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5703.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-30708

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANDREW CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 00-CR-10002-3

- - - - - - - - - -

April 11, 2002

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Andrew Christopher Johnson appeals his sentence for unlawful

use of a communication facility in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§ 843(b). He argues that his sentence should be vacated because

the $20,000 fine imposed by the district court is excessive. 

Johnson did not raise this issue before the district court. 

Therefore, we review for plain error. United States v.

Rodriguez, 15 F.3d 408, 414-15 (5th Cir. 1994). We do not find

that plain error has been established. See United States v.

Altamirano, 11 F.3d 52, 53 (5th Cir. 1993); United States v.

Matovsky, 935 F.2d 719, 722-23 (5th Cir. 1991).
No. 01-30708 

-2-

AFFIRMED.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 2057** 

UESTON LEWIS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. GORDON FERGUSON; TONY HAYWARD; BP , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Mark S. Davis , District Judge. ( 2:15

- cv - 00252

- DEM )

Submitted : January 2 7 , 2016 Decided: February 5, 2016

Before WYNN and THACKER , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON , Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Ueston Lewis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ueston Lewis seeks to a ppeal the district court’s order dismissing his complaint as time

- barred . We dismiss th e appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court ext ends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). Th e district court’s order was entered on the docket on August 7, 2015 . The notice of appeal was filed on Wednesday, September 9, 2015 . Because Lewis failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we d eny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Powers of Attorney, Michael E. Sproule


 Exhibit (10)(m) 

NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY CORPORATION 
 POWERS OF ATTORNEY FOR A LIMITED PURPOSE 
 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of
the undersigned constitutes and appoints each of Matthew M. Grove, Thomas F. English, Paul W. Horrocks, Linda M. Reimer and George E. Silos, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, each with full power of substitution and resubstitution
for him in his name, place and stead, to sign any and all registration statements or other filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission or any state regulatory agency or authority applicable to New York Life Insurance and Annuity
Corporation Variable Annuity Separate Account – II (File Number 033-53344) and any amendments or supplements thereto, and withdrawals thereof, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission or any state regulatory agency or authority granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he might or could do in person in his capacity as a Director or officer of New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corporation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. 
 These Powers of Attorney may be signed in one or more counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same document. 
  

			
		
	  
 Christopher T. Ashe
	  	  

Steven D. Lash

		
	  
 Christopher O. Blunt
	  	  

Theodore A. Mathas

		
	  
 Frank M. Boccio
	  	  
 Mark W. Pfaff

		
	  
 Stephen P.
Fisher
	  	  
 Arthur H. Seter

		
	  
 John T. Fleurant
	  	 /s/ Michael E. Sproule
 Michael E. Sproule

		
	  
 Robert M.
Gardner
	  	  
 Joel M. Steinberg

		
	  
 Solomon
Goldfinger
	  	  
 Susan A. Thrope


 Dated: April 3, 2012
# C_2016413EN.01000101.xml

| 10.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 28 October 2016

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of the Central Bank of Ireland

(ECB/2016/29)

(2016/C 413/01)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | The mandate of the Central Bank of Ireland’s current external auditors, Grant Thornton, ended following the audit for the financial year 2015. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2016. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of the Central Bank of Ireland’s current external auditors, Grant Thornton, ended following the audit for the financial year 2015. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2016.

| (3) | The Central Bank of Ireland has selected Mazars as its external auditors for the financial years 2016 to 2020, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Central Bank of Ireland has selected Mazars as its external auditors for the financial years 2016 to 2020,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that Mazars should be appointed as the external auditors of the Central Bank of Ireland for the financial years 2016 to 2020.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 28 October 2016.

The President of the ECB

Mario DRAGHI

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DANIEL DAVID FERRIS,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00222-CR

Appeal from the

243rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20170D00570)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State’s third motion for extension of time within which to file the

brief until August 18, 2019. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

THE STATE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime E. Esparza, the State’s attorney, prepare the 

State’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before August 18, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 3

rd day of July, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
No. 10-10997.

#### Timoteo Upia-Frias, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 861, 132 S. Ct. 200,

181 L. Ed. 2d 105,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5852.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

*106Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 78.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 38 (Friday, February 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8930-8931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4165]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-687-000]


Florida MSW LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

February 20, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Florida MSW LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an 
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC, 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to

[[Page 8931]]

intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is March 12, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC, 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a2e4e7f0e1edcccecbccc7f1d7d2d2cdd0d6e2c4c7d0c18cc5cdd4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="89cfccdbcac6e7e5e0e7ecdafcf9f9e6fbfdc9efecfbeaa7eee6ff">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-4165 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, F. I. duPont, III, Chairman and CEO of First National Bancshares, Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First National Bancshares, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)           **[This paragraph intentionally left blank.]**(c)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and(d)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 15, 2005/s/ F. I. duPont, IIIF. I. duPont, III, Chairman & CEO
No. 11-6282.

#### Okang Kareen Rochelle, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 958, 132 S. Ct. 438,

181 L. Ed. 2d 285,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7165.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 275.
Montana Eleventh Judicial District Court. County of Flathead.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- BRANDON LEE WEBB, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-16-114

DECISION

On August 4, 2016, the Court sentenced the Defendant to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a period of ten (10) years, with five (5) years suspended, with a recommended placement at Connections Corrections followed by ISP, for the offense of Burglary, a Felony, in violation of §45-6-204(1), MCA. The Court granted credit for twelve (12) days served in custody pending final disposition in this matter.

On November 18, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present having been transported from START and was represented by Peter Ohman of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

*119Done in open Court this 18th day of November, 2016.

DATED this 8th day of December, 2016.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member.
This document can be found on the CDC website at:

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/vfc/providers/resolutions.html

Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices 

Vaccines for Children Program 

Resolution No. 6/94-16 

Outbreak Control 

The ACIP has established a schedule for immunization of children 0-18 years eligible to 

be covered by the VFC program. This schedule applies to routine circumstances. 

However, during emergencies, such as outbreaks, other children who qualify for the VFC 

program will need vaccines. 

The ACIP recommends that state and local health authorities be given flexibility to 

provide vaccine purchased by the VFC program for additional VFC eligible children 

during outbreaks provided that those outbreak control measures are consistent with 

existing ACIP recommendations. 

Adopted: June 29, 1994 

Effective: October 1, 1994
# C_2016074EN.01000101.xml

| 26.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/1

---

Communication from the Commission regarding the start of the functioning of the Advisory Council for Aquaculture, of the Advisory Council for Markets and of the Advisory Council for the Black Sea

(2016/C 74/01)

Article 43(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the Common Fisheries Policy (1) establishes four new Advisory Councils, including one for aquaculture, one for markets and one for the Black Sea.

1

In line with Article 3 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/242 of 9 October 2014 laying down detailed rules on the functioning of the Advisory Councils under the Common Fisheries Policy (2), stakeholders interested in the setting up of three new Advisory Councils for aquaculture, markets and the Black Sea respectively, have submitted to the Commission joint applications concerning the start of the functioning of each of the three Advisory Councils referred to above.

2

The Commission has verified the compatibility of the joint applications with the relevant EU rules and subsequently transmitted them to the Member States concerned who needed to determine whether the applications were signed by representative sector organisations and other interest groups.

Member States concerned did not raise any objection within the deadline of one month set in Article 3(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/242.

In conclusion, the Advisory Councils for aquaculture, for markets and for the Black Sea can start functioning and become eligible for Union financial assistance in line with Annex III of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 in the form of an annual contribution covering a part of their operational costs from the day following the publication of this Communication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---

(1)  OJ L 354, 28.12.2013, p. 22.

1

(2)  OJ L 41, 17.2.2015, p. 1.

2

---