alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Type I - High Altitude/Cold Weather MORE

Pack 1

Caffeine Chocolate Pudding 

Nut and Fruit Mix, Type II

Toaster Pastry

Energy Gel, Mixed Berry 

Snack, Filled Pretzels, 

Cheddar

Pack 2

First Strike Bar, 

Chocolate

Nut and Fruit Mix, Type II 

Energy Gel, Lemon Lime 

Snack, Corn Kernels

Beef Snack, Teriyaki

Caffeinated Gum, Cinnamon 

Beverage, Carb Fortified 1/

Pack 3

Cracker

Spread Soup Mix 

Applesauce

Snack, Baked Cracker 

First Strike Bar,

Mini Mocha

Beverage, Carb Fortified 1/

Type II – Hot Weather MORE

Pack 1

Caffeine Chocolate Pudding 

Dried Cranberries

Energy Gel, Mixed Berry 

Snack, Filled Pretzels, 

Cheddar

Beverage, Carbo Electro (2) 2/

Pack 2

First Strike Bar, 

Chocolate

Nuts, Almonds, Smoked 

Energy Gel, Lemon Lime 

Applesauce

Caffeinated Gum, Peppermint 

Beverage, Carbo Electro (2) 2/

Pack 3

Energy Gel, Orange 

Snack, Corn Kernels 

Applesauce, Cinnamon

Nut and Fruit Mix, Type II

First Strike Bar,

Mini Mocha

Beverage, Carbo Electro (2) 2/

Beverage Carb Fortified Flavors:

Orange 

Lemon-Lime 

Grape

Tropical Punch

Beverage Carbohydrate Electrolyte Flavors:

Fruit Punch

Grape

Lemon-Lime

Orange
No. 09-762.

#### Vernon Claville, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 940, 130 S. Ct. 1536,

176 L. Ed. 2d 115,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1467.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 348 Fed. Appx. 910.
No. 11-5943.

#### Lakesha Norington, Petitioner v. Keith Butts, Superintendent, Pendleton Correctional Facility.

565 U.S. 1174, 132 S. Ct. 1138,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1011,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 589.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 981, 132 S. Ct. 501, 181 L. Ed. 2d 354, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7750.
No. 11-7419.

#### In re James Earl Butler, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 1155, 132 S. Ct. 1111,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1010,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 699.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Deny and Opinion Filed May 30, 2014 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-14-00619-CV IN RE JAMES MCCOY, Relator Original Proceeding from the 292nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F02-02115-V 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Lang-Miers, and Myers Opinion by Justice Bridges Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus requesting that the Court order the trial court to rule on his motion to co mpel the Dallas County District Attorney’s office to respond to questions that he wished answer ed in conjunction with his petiti on for writ of habeas corpus in federal court. This Court has not been given ge neral supervisory control over district and county

courts. Texas Emp. Ins. Ass'n v. Kirby , 150 S.W.2d 123, 126 (Tex. Civ. App.—Dallas 1941, no writ); see also Guillory v. Davis , 527 S.W.2d 465, 466 (Tex. Civ. App.—Beaumont 1975, no writ). In a criminal case, to be entitled to ma ndamus relief, the relator must show two things: (1) that he has no adequate remedy at la w, and (2) that what he seeks to compel is a ministerial act. In re Bonilla , 424 S.W.3d 528, 533 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Consideration of a motion properly filed and before the court is a ministerial act. State ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (citing State ex rel. Curry v. Gray , 726 S.W.2d 125, 128 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987) (opinion on reh'g)). He re, however, even if th e motion is on file in–2– the convicting court, it is not “properly filed” in the trial court. The mo tion relator has filed in the trial court is a motion to compel discovery ag ainst the District Attorney in relator’s federal case. The case in which relator has filed his motion is the state criminal case in which he was convicted. The state court that convicted relator does not have th e authority to compel discovery in his federal case and, thus, does not have a ministerial duty to rule on relator’s motion seeking such discovery. Accordingly, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus.

140619F.P05 /David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
MEAL, Ready-to-Eat (MRE)

Table L

Contractor Abbreviations

Contractor ABV

ABC Ventures ABC

Ameriqual Foods AMQ

Ameriqual Packaging AMP

Amspak AMK

Bridgford Food Corp BRI

Carton Services CAR

Compact Industries COM

Consolidated Packaging Group CON

DD Bean & Sons DDB

Diamond Crystal DIA

Dot Foods DOT

Ford Gum FDG

Gamay Foods GAM

Heartland Foods Corp HEA

Jianas Brothers Packaging JSP

Keltner KEL

Lighthouse Industries LIG

Luxfer Magtech LUX

M&M Mars MRS

Mars Wrigley MAW

Nex-xos Worldwide/ Jel-Sert NEX

Oregon Freeze Dry ORE

Pioneer Packaging PIO

SopakCo Packaging SOP

SopakCo Processing (Bennettsville) SOB

Sterling Foods STE

Sugar Foods Corporation SUG

The Hershey Company HER

Thermo-Pac TPI

Towelettes Etc. TOW

Trans-Packers Services TRA

Truetech TRU

World Flavors WOL

Wornick Foods WOR

Revised: January 2019
*

John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment.

NO. 07-02-0337-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

JANUARY 24, 2003

______________________________

ALAN ROYBAL SEPEDA, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 242ND DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY;

NO. B13712-0004; HONORABLE ED SELF, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ. and BOYD, S.J.

*

ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Pursuant to a guilty plea, appellant was convicted of driving while intoxicated and

punishment was assessed at five years confinement, suspended. After a hearing on the State’s

motion to revoke, appellant’s community supervision was revoked and punishment was assessed

at the original five-year sentence and a $1,000 fine. Appellant perfected this appeal and the

clerk’s record was filed on September 10, 2002. On November 1, 2002, David Fortenberry filed
2

a request for an extension of time in which to file the reporter’s record indicating that he was

unable to complete an approximate 50-page record due to his case load and was given until

December 2, 2002. The record has yet to be filed and no further request for an extension of time

was filed. Thus, we now abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further

proceedings. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(a)(2). 

Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and,

thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following:

1. whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, and if so,

2. why appellant has been deprived of a reporter’s record.

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. Should it be determined that appellant

does want to continue this appeal and is indigent, then the trial court shall also take such

measures as may be necessary to assure appellant a reporter’s record. The trial court shall

execute findings of fact, conclusions of law, and such orders as the court may enter regarding the

aforementioned issues, and cause its findings and conclusions to be included in a supplemental

clerk’s record. A supplemental record of the hearing shall also be included in the appellate

record. Finally, the trial court shall file the supplemental records with the Clerk of this Court by

Friday, February 21, 2003.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
(1) Adjusting Price $25.89 CWT

(2) Base Price $24.89 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $1.00

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0860

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0430

Price change per quart $0.0215

Price change per pint $0.0107

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0081

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0067

Price change per half pint $0.0054

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.09

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.04

Price adjustment per quart $0.02

Price adjustment per pint $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price adjustment per half pint $0.01

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Dept. of Food and Agriculture Announcement of Minimum Prices

 Effective Date: May 4, 2014
1 Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 4:18 PM

To: 'scottecarlson459@gmail.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Informat ion - Aerial Imaging Systems

Dear Mr. Carlson:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

‐ 2015

‐ 1337). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

* Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e.

‐ fixed

‐ wing,rotorcraft, lighter

‐ than

‐ air) for the

proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload). This

information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

.

Please submit the additional information (non

‐ proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e

‐ mail to

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information

described above by 7/1/2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying

you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

‐ 9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202

‐ 267

‐ 9521
***************************** 

 * MONOGRAPH NO.: 3A2 

 ***************************** 

ITEM: Apple Dessert (ADE) 

NSN: 8940-01-147-7855 ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR A 004 Tray Can 

 8940-01-455-1876 PCR A 003 Poly Tray 

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 205 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM: 

APPEARANCE: Relatively uniform sized apple slices in a smooth, thick sauce with dark spice 

specks. Color profile: Light yellow, straw-colored apples in a yellow-tan sauce. Spice specks are 

dark brown. 

ODOR: Slightly sweet with a slight to moderate spicy (nutmeg) cooked apple aroma. 

FLAVOR: Typical of cooked apples with a slightly sweet and spicy (nutmeg and cinnamon) 

flavor. 

TEXTURE: Slight to medium firm cooked apples in a smooth sauce. 

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT 70 DEGREES F: 36 months 

 80 DEGREES F: 24 months 

 90 DEGREES F: 18 months 

 100 DEGREES F: 12 months 

EXPECTED DETERIORATIVE CHANGES: 

APPEARANCE: Product may become a little darker. 

ODOR: Product may become slightly stale and exhibit a slight loss of apple and spice odor. 

FLAVOR: Product may exhibit some loss of spice flavor and may become a little bitter due to 

the spices. 

TEXTURE: Apples may become a little softer. 

 UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None. 

SPECIAL NOTES: Can is designed to yield 18 portions of approximately 3/4 cup each (159 

grams).
Date: 3 October 2022 *****************************

NSN: 8940-01-701-7687 (ARCM) * MONOGRAPH: MCW/LRP 01A

 *****************************

Item: Adobo Rice and Chicken, Mexican Style, Cooked, Dehydrated

Document: PCR-A-006, Adobo Rice and Chicken, Mexican Style, Cooked, Dehydrated, 

Packaged in a Stand Up Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 580 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Dehydrated product: Mixture of off-white colored long grain parboiled white rice, light 

to medium brown pinto beans, off-white to light tan whole muscle fibrous chicken

pieces, light to medium tan cauliflower florets and pieces, white to off-white onion

pieces and green zucchini slices covered in a free-flowing, light to medium orange 

brown colored sauce powder with tomato pieces and flecks of herbs and spices.

Rehydrated product: Mixture of off-white colored distinct long grain white rice grains,

light to medium brown pinto beans, off-white to light tan distinct whole muscle 

chicken pieces (may have color from sauce), light to medium tan cauliflower florets 

and pieces, translucent white to off-white onion pieces and green zucchini slices in an 

orange brown colored sauce with tomato pieces and flecks of herbs and spices.

Odor:

Dehydrated product: Mild to moderate tomato, cumin, and chili spice.

Rehydrated product: Cooked moderate Mexican style adobo chili spice, cumin, white 

rice, tomato, pinto bean, chicken, cauliflower, onion, and zucchini.

Flavor:

Rehydrated product: Cooked moderate Mexican style adobo chili spice, cumin, white 

rice, tomato, pinto bean, chicken, cauliflower, onion, zucchini and shall elicit a 

sensation of moderate heat.

Texture:

Dehydrated product: No wet or soft spots indicating incomplete dehydration.

Rehydrated product: Fully rehydrated within twelve minutes, moist and slightly soft to 

slightly firm white rice, slightly soft to slightly firm pinto beans (may be slightly dry 

inside), moist and tender chicken breast meat pieces with a cooked whole muscle 

chicken breast meat texture; soft and tender cauliflower florets and pieces, onion 

pieces; and zucchini slices.

Possible Deteriorative Changes

Appearance: Dehydrated and rehydrated product: Excessive darkening or loss of color of sauce, rice, 

chicken, or vegetables.

Odor: Dehydrated and rehydrated product: Cardboard, oxidized, stale, rancid, scorched, 

burnt, old fowl.

Flavor: Dehydrated and rehydrated product: Cardboard, oxidized, rancid, scorched, burnt, old 

fowl, bitter vegetables, loss of spice.

Texture:

Dehydrated product: Very hard, tacky components.

Rehydrated product: Unrehydrated product, chewy, dry, or mushy chicken, mushy or 

tough vegetables, excessive syneresis.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

N/A

Special Notes
Date: 3 October 2022 *****************************

NSN: 8940-01-701-7687 (ARCM) * MONOGRAPH: MCW/LRP 01A

 *****************************

N/A
<page>
Exhibit 10.05(b)
AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED CUSTOMER AGREEMENT
      WHEREAS, MORGAN STANLEY CHARTER MILLBURN L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership (the "Customer"), and MORGAN STANLEY
DW INC., a Delaware corporation
(?Morgan Stanley DW?), have agreed to amend the Amended and Restated Customer
Agreement, dated as of the 13th day of November
 2000, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the
Customer Agreement, dated July 31, 2003 (the "Customer
Agreement"), by and between the
Customer and Morgan Stanley DW, to reduce the monthly
brokerage fee payable to Morgan
Stanley DW and to amend the address of the Customer
 and the address of Morgan Stanley DW.
      WHEREAS, all provisions contained in the Customer
Agreement remain in full force and
effect and are modified only to the extent necessary
 to provide for the amendments set forth
below.
      NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby amend the Customer Agreement as
follows:
1.	The monthly brokerage fee percentage of 1/12 of 6.25% (a 6.25% annual rate)
referred to in the first paragraph of Section 5 of the Customer Agreement is
hereby reduced to 1/12 of 6.00% (a 6.00% annual rate).
2.	The address of the Customer referred to in Section 13 is hereby changed to:

Morgan Stanley Charter Millburn L.P.
c/o Demeter Management Corporation
330 Madison Avenue, 8th Floor
New York, New York 10017
Attn:	Jeffrey A. Rothman
	President
3.	The address of Morgan Stanley DW referred to in Section 13 is hereby changed
to:
Morgan Stanley DW Inc.
330 Madison Avenue, 8th Floor
New York, New York 10017
Attn:	Jeffrey A. Rothman
	Managing Director
4.	The foregoing amendments shall take effect as of the 1st day of July 2005.



      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment to the Customer Agreement has been
executed for and on behalf of the undersigned as of the 1st day of July 2005.

MORGAN STANLEY CHARTER MILLBURN L.P.

By:	  Demeter Management Corporation,
	  General Partner

By:	/s/  Jeffrey A. Rothman
	Name:	Jeffrey A. Rothman
	Title:	President

MORGAN STANLEY DW INC.

By:	/s/  Jeffrey A. Rothman
	Name:	Jeffrey A. Rothman
	Title:	Managing Director
57:
No. 11-7306.

#### In re Anthony C. Deloney, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 1078, 132 S. Ct. 835,

181 L. Ed. 2d 542,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8752.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Exhibit 32.3

Written Statement of the Chief Operating Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned President and Chief Operating Officer of Regency Centers, L. P. (the
Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: May 9, 2008      
|                       
|/s/ Mary Lou Fiala     
|Mary Lou Fiala         
|Chief Operating Officer
#### McCrorie v. Franz

2016 MT 313N

DA 16-0046

11/29/16

Affirmed

Dist. 11 (Flathead)
Date: 20 July 2017 ********************

NSN: 8905-01-455-3547 (PSL) * MONOGRAPH 1B4

 ********************

Item: Pork Sausage Links in Brine (Heat and Serve)

Document: PCR-P-015A

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 319 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life:

80 Degrees F: 36 m

100 Degrees F: 6 m

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Medium brown color with a grilled or browned exterior surface.

Odor: Cooked pork with a slight odor of sausage seasoning and black pepper.

Flavor: Cooked pork with moderate sausage seasoning and black pepper.

Texture: Medium grind pork, moist and moderately firm.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkening or discoloration, dried out appearance.

Odor: Rancid, loss of sausage seasoning odor.

Flavor: Rancid, some loss of sausage seasoning or old cooked pork flavor.

Texture: Links may become dry, rubbery, or mushy meat.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

None

Special Notes

Polymeric Tray is designed to yield 18 portions of 4 sausage links each.
No. 11-7897.

#### Haarun Abu Latif Munir, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1172, 132 S. Ct. 1129,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1006,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 594.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 451 Fed. Appx. 672.
25 March 2011 **************************

NSN: 8940-01-545-1806 (SHQC) * MONOGRAPH NO:FS1-12

 **************************

Item: Sandwich, Shelf Stable, Honey barbeque chicken (Type III)

Document: MIL-DTL-32141, Sandwich, Shelf Stable, for Operational Rations

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 290 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 2 years at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Sandwich: no evidence of compression streaks, filling is fully enrobed in bread. 

Crust: uniform and medium golden brown.

Crumb: white to off white color.

Chicken: less than 1/2 inch pieces.

Odor: Sandwich: slightly sweet barbecue, hickory, honey-like.

Bread: slight fermented and smoked.

Flavor: Filling: slightly sweet barbecue, hickory, honey-like.

Bread: slight fermented and smoked.

Texture:

Filling: moist, very slightly chewy; not pasty or excessively dry.

Bread: slightly dense, uniform cell structure; not excessively dry, crumbly, or 

excessively moist and gummy.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Filling: brown to black; dry, crumbly. 

Bread: darkened or browned crumb; cracked crust, dry, crumbly. 

Odor: Stale, oxidized, rancid, scorched.

Flavor: Sour, bitter, stale, oxidized, rancid, scorched.

Texture: Filling dry, crumbly, tough chewy meat. 

Bread: dry, crumbly, or gummy. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

This product should contain an oxygen scavenger packet. If defects such as oxidized or rancid odors 

exist, they are likely due to package failure or the absence of an oxygen scavenger.

Special Notes

Each pouch shall contain one intact sandwich and one intact oxygen scavenger.

Some bleeding of filling into the bread crumb is normal but may increase over time.
No. 11-7447.

#### Randall Joe Marshall, Petitioner v. Anita Trammell, Warden.

565 U.S. 1166, 132 S. Ct. 1112,

181 L. Ed. 2d 994,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 772.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
ITEM: Rice with Beans (RWB) MONOGRAPH NO.: KB13

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE: 590 Kilocalories.

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Thick congealed carmel color sauce small,
medium kidney beans, red bell peppers off-white
rice, very little free sauce

ODOR: Spicy tomato and cooked beans

FLAVOR: Spicy tomato with cooked beans

TEXTURE: Firm beans and rice thick, dry congealed sauce, oily

DEFECTS LIKELY TO OCCUR:

APPEARANCE: Darkening of sauce and beans, rice oily

ODOR: Strong tomato
FLAVOR: Increaded bitterness or spice flavor
TEXTURE: No free sauce, excessive thickening or thinning of sauce

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None

SPECIAL NOTES: None

44
Montana Fourth Judicial District Court. County of Missoula.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- WILLIAM JOHN STRUTHERS, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-11-527

DECISION

*57Done in open Court this 6th day of May, 2016.

DATED this 10th day of June, 2016.

On October 23, 2015, the Defendant’s suspended sentence was revoked and he was sentenced to a commitment of three (3) years to the Department of Corrections for the offense of Count I: Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs - Not otherwise Provided for, a Felony, in violation of §45-9-102(6), MCA. The Defendant was granted credit for time served in the amount of forty three (43) days, but was not granted any credit for street time. The Court recommended that the Defendant be evaluated for drug treatment and successfully complete Aftercare.

On May 6, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Jennifer Streano of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member.
No. 11-5891.

#### Sidney R. Miller, Petitioner v. In the Matter of the Application of the County Treasurer for Judgment and Order of Sale Against Lands and Lots Returned Delinquent for Non-Payment of General Taxes and/or Special Assessment.

565 U.S. 1152, 132 S. Ct. 1086,

181 L. Ed. 2d 804,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 458.

January 9, 2012.

Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 966, 132 S. Ct. 459, 181 L. Ed. 2d 299, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7458.