alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 2085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-402]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel, Beeson Review.
    Date: February 3-4, 2009.
    Time: 4 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, 
MD 20814.
    Contact Person: William Cruce, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
National Institute on Aging, Scientific Review Branch, Gateway 
Building 2C-212, 7201 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-402-
7704, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#10736265737567507e79713e7e79783e777f66"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="53302126303624133d3a327d3d3a3b7d343c25">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel Social Neuroscience RFA.
    Date: February 23-24, 2009.
    Time: 4 p.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Jeannette L Johnson, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institutes on Aging, National Institutes of 
Health, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-
402-7705, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bcf6f3f4f2eff3f2f685fcf2f5fd92f2f5f492fbf3ea"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="662c292e283529282c5f26282f2748282f2e48212930">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 6, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-402 Filed 1-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 11-7813.

#### Phillip Robert Hedrich, aka Phillip R. Hedrich, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1170, 132 S. Ct. 1124,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1003,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 689.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 09-8690.

#### Ronald Miles, Petitioner v. Gene M. Johnson, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

559 U.S. 1001, 130 S. Ct. 1901,

176 L. Ed. 2d 357,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2491.

March 22, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305, and cases cited therein.
No. 11-7496.

#### Edward Dickey, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1133, 132 S. Ct. 1055,

181 L. Ed. 2d 774,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 314.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 449 Fed. Appx. 290.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7615

JEROME ALEXANDER RIDDICK, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN OF BRUNSWICK CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-325-AM) Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 18, 1999 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerome Alexander Riddick, Appellant Pro Se. Marla Graff Decker, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on October 9, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on October 13, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Jerome Alexander Riddick appeals the district court’s order granting Respondent’s motion to dismiss and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny his motions for anevidentiary hearing, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See Riddick v. Warden of Brunswick Correctional Ctr. , No. CA-98-325-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 13, 1998). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Compensation Program for Certain Directors, effective April 28, 2011



 Exhibit 10.20.1 
 Compensation of Directors 
 Directors who are also our employees or employees of the GS entities,
the Onex entities, or their respective affiliates receive no additional compensation for serving as directors. Directors who are not our employees or employees of the GS entities, the Onex entities, or their respective affiliates receive,

  

	•	 	 cash compensation of $17,500 per quarter; 


  

	•	 	 11,429 Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”); 


  

	•	 	 an opportunity to make an irrevocable election annually on or before December 31 to take up to $12,500 of their quarterly cash compensation in
equivalent shares of HBI common stock; and 


  

	•	 	 an opportunity to make an irrevocable election annually to defer up to 50% of their cash compensation with a Company matching contribution of up to 50%
of the first 4% of the eligible compensation. 


 In addition, each director who is not our employee or an employee of the GS
entities, the Onex entities, or their respective affiliates and who also serves as a Chairperson for the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of HBI will receive an additional $1,250 per quarter.
Any additional information, views, or arguments available to 

support your request:

Specifications 

Aircraft 

Weight (Battery & Propellers Included) 1280 g 

Max. Ascent Speed 5 m/s 

Max. Descent Speed 3 m/s 

Max. Speed 16 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind) 

Max. Flight Altitude 6000 m 

Max. Flight Time Approximately 23 minutes 

Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C 

GPS Mode GPS/GLONASS 

Gimbal 

Controllable Range Pitch: - 90° to + 30° 

Vision Positioning 

Velocity Range < 8 m/s (2 m above ground) 

Altitude Range 30 cm-300 cm 

Operating Range 30 cm-300 cm 

Operating 

Environment Brightly lit (lux > 15) patterned surfaces 

Camera 

Sensor Sony EXMOR 1/2.3” Effective pixels:12.4 M (total pixels: 

12.76 M) 

Lens FOV 94° 20mm(35mm format equivalent ) f/2.8 

ISO Range 100-3200(video) 100-1600(photo) 

Electronic Shutter 

Speed 8s -1/8000s 

Image Max. Size 4000 x 3000 

Still Photography 

Modes 

Single shot

Burst shooting: 3/5/7 frames

Auto Exposure Bracketing (AEB): 3/5 Bracketed frames at 

0.7EV Bias Time-lapse 

Supported SD Card 

Types 

Micro SD

Max. capacity: 64 GB. Class 10 or UHS-1 rating required 

Video Recording 

Modes 

UHD : 4096x2160p 24/25, 3840x2160p24/25/30 

FHD:1920x1080p 24/25/30/48/50/60 HD:1280x720p 

24/25/30/48/50/60 

Max. Bitrate Of 

Video Storage 60 Mbps 

Supported File 

Formats 

FAT32/exFAT

Photo: JPEG, DNG
Video: MP4/MOV (MPEG-4 AVC/H.264) 

Operating 

Temperature Range 0°C to 40°C 

Remote Controller 

Operating 

Frequency 2.400 GHz-2.483 GHz 

Transmitting 

Distance 2000 m (Outdoor And Unobstructed) 

Video Output Port USB 

Operating 

Temperature Range 0°C- 40°C 

Battery 6000 mAh LiPo 2S 

Mobile Device 

Holder Tablets and smartphones 

Transmitter 

Power(EIRP) FCC: 20 dbm; CE:16 dbm 

Working Voltage 1.2 A @7.4 V 

Charger 

Voltage 17.4 V 

Rated Power 100 W 

Intelligent Flight Battery ( PH3-4480 mAh-15.2 V ) 

Capacity 4480 mAh 

Voltage 15.2 V 

Battery Type LiPo 4S 

Energy 68 Wh

Net Weight 365 g 

Operating 

Temperature -10°C- 40°C 

Max. Charging 

Power 100 W
2 July 2014 ********************

NSN: 8940-01-525-3619 (HBB) * MONOGRAPH 1D7

 ********************

Item: Hash brown potatoes with bacon, peppers and onions

Document: PCR-H-012, Hash Brown Potatoes with Bacon, Peppers and Onions, Packaged in a 

Flexible Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 240 Component Classification: Primary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Hash brown potatoes: Discernible, loosely formed potato shreds, off-white color.

Bacon: Reddish-brown pieces.

Green bell pepper: Green dices.

Onion: Off-white, minced.

Odor: Cooked hash brown potato, cooked smoked bacon and green pepper.

Flavor: Cooked hash brown potato with cooked smoked bacon and mild green bell pepper and 

onion.

Texture:

Hash brown potatoes: Moist and tender, not mushy.

Bacon: Firm and tender.

Green bell pepper: Soft and tender.

Onion: Soft and tender.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance:

Hash brown potatoes: Darkened, grayish potato with few discernible shreds. 

Bacon: Excessively dark brown. 

Green bell pepper: Grayish off- colored.

Onion: Darkened or discolored.

Odor: Rancid, musty, bitter, excessive smoke.

Flavor: Rancid, musty, bitter, excessive smoke.

Texture: Hash brown potatoes: Soft, mushy. 

Bacon: Excessively hard.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA
2 July 2014 ********************

NSN: 8940-01-525-3619 (HBB) * MONOGRAPH 1D7

 ********************

Special Notes

NA
No. 09-802.

#### Martin Nitschke, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

559 U.S. 940, 130 S. Ct. 1546,

176 L. Ed. 2d 116,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1376.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 332 Fed. Appx. 173.
No. 09-8380.

#### Mario Nathaniel Baker, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 955, 130 S. Ct. 1548,

176 L. Ed. 2d 139,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1207.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 340 Fed. Appx. 145.
NO. 07-02-0187-CR NO. 07-02-0188-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL A JULY 25, 2002

______________________________ DAVID RUSSELL HALE, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A PPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 47 TH DISTRIC T COURT O F POTT ER COUNTY; NOS. 44,828-A, 33,491-A; HON ORABLE DAVID L. GLEASON, JU DGE

_______________________________ Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS an d JOHNSON, JJ. Appellant

David R ussell Hal e attempted to f ile noticesof appeal pro se i n the referenced matters. Because there was conf usion surr oundin g w hich orders he was appealing and no clerk’s or reporter’s record s had been recei ved, we abated and remanded the app eals to the trial court for a determi nation as to w hether appellant had abandoned his appeals. We have now received a transcri pt of the hearing hel d by the tr ial2

court in whic h appellant stated on th e record that he no longer wished to pursue those appeals. We have also received findings of fact and conclusions of law si gned by

the trial court in w hich it has be en found that appellant has abandoned his appe als.
An appeal may be voluntarily dismissed in a criminal case if the party withdraws his notice of appeal by fili ng a writt en wit hdra wal pe rson ally si gned by him with th is cou rt. T ex. R. App. P. 42.2(a) . However, we have the authority , pursuant to R ul e 2 o f the Rules of Appellate Procedure, to suspend the operati on of Rule 42.2(a) for this appeal only , and find thatappellant has v

oluntarily dismissed hi s appeals by virtue of his testimon yduring the hearing, despite his l ack of compliance w ith that rule

. See Conners v. State , 966 S.W.2d 108, 110-11 (Tex. App.--Houston [1 stDist.] 1998, pet. ref’d). Theref ore, because the record shows appel lant no longer wishes to pursue his appeals, they are hereby

dismissed. Having dis miss ed th ese a ppea ls a s re que sted by appe lla nt, n o mot ions fo r rehearing will b e entertained and o ur mandates w ill issu e forthwith.

John T. Bo yd Chief Justice Do not publish

.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4653 

To repeal a prohibition on the use of certain funds for tunneling in certain 

areas with respect to the Los Angeles to San Fernando Valley Metro 

Rail project, California. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 22, 2005 

Mr. WAXMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To repeal a prohibition on the use of certain funds for 

tunneling in certain areas with respect to the Los Angeles to San Fernando Valley Metro Rail project, California. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROHIBITION. 

4 The second sentence of section 321 of the Depart5 ment of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropria6 tions Act, 1986 (99 Stat. 1287) is repealed. 

Æ
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 18-10760

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 0:17-cr-60165-JIC-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH E. WILLIAMS, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(March 13, 2019)

Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, MARCUS and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 18-10760 Date Filed: 03/13/2019 Page: 1 of 2 
2

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal 

waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, 

997 F.2d 1343, 1350–51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced 

if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Grinard-Henry, 399 

F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of 

the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error).

Case: 18-10760 Date Filed: 03/13/2019 Page: 2 of 2
No. 10-730.

#### Livingston Rondell Johnson, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

565 U.S. 1109, 132 S. Ct. 996,

181 L. Ed. 2d 731,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 407.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

*732Same case below, 385 Fed. Appx. 597.
No. 11-619.

#### Edward H. Flint, Petitioner v. New York Stock Exchange, et al.

565 U.S. 1178, 132 S. Ct. 1162,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1018,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 935.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 11-5025.

#### Joseph L. Arnold, III, Petitioner v. Sean P. Mallon, et al.

565 U.S. 1174, 132 S. Ct. 1137,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1011,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 666.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 886, 132 S. Ct. 259, 181 L. Ed. 2d 151, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5443.
No. 11A762.

#### American Tradition Partnership, Inc., fka Western Tradition Partnership, Inc., et al., Applicants v. Steve Bullock, Attorney General of Montana, et al.

565 U.S. 1187, 132 S. Ct. 1307,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1075.

181 L. Ed. 2d 1036,

February 17, 2012.

Application for stay, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, granted, and the Montana Supreme Court’s December 30, 2011, decision in case No. DA 11-0081, is stayed pending timely filing and disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari. Should the petition for writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon issuance of the mandate of this Court.

Same case below, 363 Mont. 220, 271 P.3d 1.

Statement of Justice Ginsburg, with whom Justice Breyer joins, respecting grant of the application for stay.

Montana’s experience, and experience elsewhere since this Court’s decision in *Citizens United*v. *Federal Election Comm’n,*558 U.S. 310, 130 S. Ct. 876, 175 L. Ed. 2d 753 (2010), make it exceedingly difficult to maintain that independent expenditures by corporations “do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption.” *Id.,*at 558 U.S. 310, 130 S. Ct. 876, 175 L. Ed. 2d 753. A petition for certiorari will give the Court an opportunity to consider whether, in light of the huge sums currently deployed to buy candidates’ allegiance, *Citizens United*should continue to hold sway. Because lower courts are bound to follow this Court’s decisions until they are withdrawn or modified, however, *Rodriguez de Quijas*v. *Shearson /American Express, Inc.,*490 U.S. 477, 484, 109 S. Ct. 1917, 104 L. Ed. 2d 526 (1989), I vote to grant the stay.
No. 09-8621.

#### Shawn J. Gieswein, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 961, 130 S. Ct. 1563,

176 L. Ed. 2d 149,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1462.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 346 Fed. Appx. 293.
No. 09-756.

#### Jeffrey C. Bourgeois, Individually and on Behalf of Dale Bourgeois, et al., Petitioners v. Boomtown, L.L.C. of Delaware, et al.

559 U.S. 972, 130 S. Ct. 1699,

176 L. Ed. 2d 182,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2136.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit, denied.

Same case below, 18 So. 3d 68.
No. 09-509.

#### Judy Jones, Petitioner v. Virginia Andrews Burdette.

559 U.S. 998, 130 S. Ct. 1756,

176 L. Ed. 2d 223,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2259.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1113, 130 S. Ct. 1070, 175 L. Ed. 2d 886, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 140.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER AMENDING RULES 102, 105, 120, 121, 301, 313, 341, 502, 553, 701, 702, 901, 1311, 1312, 1316, 1323, 1501, 1502, 1503, 1504, 1511, 1512, 1513, 1514, 1515, 1516, 1517, 1531, 1532, 1541, 1542, 1543, 1551, 1561, 1571, 1573, 1701, 1702, 1704, 1762, 1770, 1781, 1911, 2702, 3307, 3331 AND

ADOPTING RU LES 1601, 1602, 1603, 1604, 1 605, 1606, 1610, 1611, 1612,

1613 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES

OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: NO. 287

APPELLATE PROCEDURAL RULES

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7 th day of January , 2020 , upon the recommendation of the Appellate Court Procedural Rule s Committee ; the proposal having been published for public comment at 46 Pa.B. 251 8 (May 21, 2016) :

It is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania

that Rule s 102 , 105, 120, 121, 301, 313, 341, 502, 553, 701, 702, 901, 1311, 1312, 1316, 1323, 1501, 1502, 1503, 1504, 1511, 1512, 1513, 1514, 1515, 1516, 1517, 1531, 1532, 1541, 1542, 1543, 1551, 1561, 1571, 1573, 1701, 1702, 1704, 1762, 1770, 1781, 1911, 2702, 3307, 3331 of the Pennsy lvania Rules of Appellate Procedure are amended and Rules 1601, 1602, 1603, 1604, 1605, 1606, 1610, 1611, 1612, and 1613 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure are adopted in the attached form.

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall

be effective August 1, 2020

.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.
No. 09-7785.

#### Ikechi Kallys Albert, Petitioner v. Dakota Communities, Inc., et al.

559 U.S. 933, 130 S. Ct. 1507,

176 L. Ed. 2d 105,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1048.

February 22, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis *106denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

Same case below, 331 Fed. Appx. 431.
# C_2016417EN.01000603.xml

| 11.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 417/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 417/6

---

EUROPEAN GNSS AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2015

(2016/C 417/22)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.gsa.europa.eu/legal-and-financial-information

---
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (Form S-8No. 333-222812) pertaining to the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan of Colony NorthStar Credit Real Estate, Inc. of our report dated March 23, 2018 with respect to the combined financial statements of theCLNS Investment Entities included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Colony NorthStar Credit Real Estate, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2017. 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG, LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

March 23, 2018
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3450 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3450

To prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from transmitting certain 
   information to the Department of Justice for use by the national 
               instant criminal background check system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2019

Mr. Roy (for himself and Mr. Bost) introduced the following bill; which 
           was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from transmitting certain 
   information to the Department of Justice for use by the national 
               instant criminal background check system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TRANSMITTAL OF 
              CERTAIN INFORMATION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FOR USE 
              BY THE NATIONAL INSTANT CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECK SYSTEM.

    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may not transmit to any entity in 
the Department of Justice, for use by the national instant criminal 
background check system established under section 103 of the Brady 
Handgun Violence Prevention Act, personally identifying information on 
veterans and other beneficiaries, solely on the basis of a 
determination by the Secretary under chapter 11 of title 38, United 
States Code, that a person has a service-connected disability.
                                 <all>
```