alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-6483.

#### Stephen Windsor, Petitioner v. Howard Prince, Warden.

565 U.S. 1065, 132 S. Ct. 767,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8588.

181 L. Ed. 2d 493,

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2016101EN.01001301.xml

| 17.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/13

---

Notice on the implementation of the judgment in joined cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 C&J Clark International Limited and Puma SE concerning Council Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China and Vietnam

(2016/C 101/06)

In Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/223 (1) the Commission informs all interested parties that it will examine market economy treatment and individual treatment claims filed by non-sampled exporting producers of certain footwear with uppers of leather from the People’s Republic of China and Vietnam, where that is necessary in the light of pending national procedures. Interested parties are invited to make themselves known within 15 days of the publication of this Notice in the Official Journal of the European Union at the following email address: TRADE-AD499-Footwear-Court@ec.europa.eu

1

Official Journal of the European Union

---

(1)  See recitals 17-19 of the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/223 of 17 February 2016 establishing a procedure for assessing certain market economy treatment and individual treatment claims made by exporting producers from China and Vietnam, and implementing the judgment of the Court of Justice in joined cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 (OJ L 41, 18.2.2016, p. 3).

1

---
Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control

5600 Sand Lake Road Orlando, Florida 32819-8907

Exemption Letter for § 61.113(a): Private Pilot privileges and limitations: (PIC)

4/13/2015

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

FAA Rule Making Office (ARM), Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590

Mr. Ryan,

Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control (LMMFC) is re-applying for a special airworthiness 

certificate “Experimental Category” for its unmanned aircraft system (UAS). LMMFC proposes 

to operate the UAS at its corporate owned test facility (ETS Test Site) near Orlando, Florida. 

Presently, 14 CFR 61.113(a) states:

(a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) through (h) of this section, no person who holds a private pilot 

certificate may act as pilot in command of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for 

compensation or hire; nor may that person, for compensation or hire, act as pilot in command of an 

aircraft. 

The UAS pilot completed an FAA required training curriculum as specified at the time FAA 

8130.34 was written. LM pilot/observer training was completed along with applicable LMMFC 

procedures regarding safe operations within the defined test area (ETS). The UAS pilot remains

medically qualified and trained IAW FAA 8130.34 (LR). The UAS pilot has received ground and 

flight training in accordance with 14 CFR § 61, § 63 and § 65 and remains current to hold PIC 

privileges. Web-based UAS training is made available for recurrent training requirements and 

additional aircraft was purchased for PIC currency requirements in the Single Engine Land 

(SEL) category for which the pilot was originally certified. The UAS pilot holds 300+hrs of flight 

experience UAS aircraft for Lockheed Martin.

LMMFC is requesting exemption from rule 14 CFR 61.113(a); considering size and 

configuration of the UAS, and past practices previously accepted by the FAA. Current LM 

policies and procedures limit UAS flight privileges to the boundaries of the ETS range and LM 

owned property/equipment. This exemption poses no risk to general public safety.

Please contact me if you require additional information:

4/16/2015

X Jacob A. Senior

Orlando Aviation Consultants

P.O. Box 621295, Orlando FL 32862

Signed by: Jacob Senior (affiliate)
No. 11-7987.

#### Rashaan P. Hall, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1184, 132 S. Ct. 1158,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1029,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1038.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Montana Eleventh Judicial District Court. County of Flathead.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- ADAM REMUS RICHARDSON, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-15-545

DECISION

On June 30, 2016, the Court sentenced the Defendant to the Department of Corrections for a period of thirteen (13) months, with recommendations for the WATCh Program, followed by a five (5) year suspended period of commitment to the Department of Corrections, for the offense of Driving Under the Influence of Drugs or Alcohol, a Felony, in violation of §61-8-401(1), *113MCA. Upon successful completion of appropriate treatment, the balance of the 13-month DOC commitment shall be suspended. The Court granted the Defendant credit in the amount of seven (7) days for time served in custody pending final disposition in this matter.

Done in open Court this 18th day of November, 2016.

DATED this 8th day of December, 2016.

On November 18, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Peter Ohman of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member.
No. 11-6724.

#### Sol Rosen, Petitioner v. North Shore Towers Apartments, Inc.

565 U.S. 1083, 132 S. Ct. 823,

181 L. Ed. 2d 533,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8773,

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
No. D-2613.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Sara Davis Harman.

565 U.S. 1053, 132 S. Ct. 811,

181 L. Ed. 2d 521,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8335.

November 28, 2011.

Sara Davis Har-man, of Glen Allen, Virginia, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Amendment No. 1 to Letter Agreement



 Exhibit 4.26 
 EXA CORPORATION 
 55 Network Drive 

Burlington, MA 01803 
 April 5, 2012 
 FMR LLC 
 Fidelity Ventures Limited 
 InfoTech Fund I LLC 

82 Devonshire Street 
 Boston, MA 02109

 Boston Capital Ventures, III, Limited Partnership 
 Boston Capital Partners, IV, Limited Partnership 
 84 State Street 

Boston, MA 02109 
 Attention: Paul L. Mucci and
Jack Shields 
 Re: Amendment No. 1 to Agreement for Participation in Initial Public Offering 

Gentlemen: 
 Reference is made
to that certain Agreement for Participation in Initial Public Offering, dated as of August 3, 2011 (the “Agreement”) by and between Exa Corporation (“Exa”), FMR LLC, Fidelity Ventures Limited
(“FVL”), InfoTech Fund I LLC, as successor to Fidelity Investors Limited Partnership (“FILP” and collectively with FMR LLC and FVL, the “FMR Entities”) and Boston Capital
Ventures, III, Limited Partnership and Boston Capital Partners, IV, Limited Partnership (collectively the “BCV Entities”). 
 At the request of Exa and Stifel and to facilitate the IPO, the FMR Entities and the BCV Entities, along with certain other shareholders of Exa, have agreed to extend the termination date of the
Amendment, Consent and Waiver and the Lock-up Agreements described in the Agreement to June 30, 2012. 
 In consideration
of the foregoing, and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned agree as follows: 
 1. Section 8 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 
 This Agreement shall expire and become null and void in the event that an underwriting agreement with respect to Exa’s initial public offering shall not have been executed by June 30, 2012.








 2. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect without modification. Upon the effectiveness of this Amendment, each reference in the Agreement to “this Agreement,” “hereunder,” “herein,” or other words of like import
shall mean and be a reference to the Agreement as amended hereby. 
 To confirm that this letter sets forth our agreement,
kindly execute a copy of this letter where indicated below and return it to me. 
 *** Remainder of Page Intentionally Left
Blank *** 







 We appreciate the continued support of the FMR Entities and the BCV Entities for Exa and the
IPO process. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	EXA CORPORATION
	
	 /s/ Stephen A. Remondi
  

Stephen Remondi

	Chief Executive Officer


  

			
	cc:	 	John D. Patterson, Jr., Esq.
		 	Robert W. Sweet, Jr., Esq.
		 	David Goldman, Esq.
		 	Joel Rubinstein, Esq.
		 	Meir Lewittes, Esq.

  

			
	FMR LLC
		
	By	 	 /s/ Steven F. Schiffman

	
	FIDELITY VENTURES LIMITED
		
	By:	 	 Fidelity Capital Associates, Inc.
 Its Managing General Partner

		
	By	 	 /s/ Paul L. Mucci










			
	INFOTECH FUND I LLC
		
	By:	 	Northern Neck Investors LLC
		 	Its Manager
		
	By	 	 /s/ Paul L. Mucci

	
	BOSTON CAPITAL VENTURES III, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Johan von der Glotz

	
	BOSTON CAPITAL VENTURES IV, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
		
	By:	 	 /s/ John J. Shields, III
No. 11-6491.

#### Ahsan Mohiuddin, Petitioner v. Raytheon Company.

565 U.S. 1065, 132 S. Ct. 768,

181 L. Ed. 2d 494,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8560.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

************************ 

MONOGRAPH NO. BE9 

************************ 

ITEM: PORK SAUSAGE IN CREAM GRAVY, #10 Can 

REFERENCE: PCR-P-040 NSN: 8940 01 517 9950 

COMPONENT CLASSIFICATION: Primary 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM: 

APPEARANCE: moderately thick cream gravy; light tan/gray cream gravy; light brown/tan pork; 

moist pork; specks of spice; glossy surface 

ODOR: breakfast pork sausage spice 

FLAVOR: peppery aftertaste; breakfast sausage spice; moderately salty; cream gravy 

TEXTURE: moderately thick and smooth gravy; medium grind sausage; moist ground pork; grainy 

chew down of ground pork 

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36 months; 100 DEGREES F: 6 months 

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES: 

APPEARANCE: darkening/graying of gravy; oiling out; stringiness of gravy; thickening or thinning 

of gravy. 

ODOR: metallic; loss of odor; thermally processed odor; sour Flavor: metallic; loss of spice flavor; 

sourness; thermally processed flavor. 

TEXTURE: thinning or thickening of gravy; drier crumbly pork; lumpy or stringy gravy. 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None 

SPECIAL NOTES: None
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        I, Kenneth J. Cichocki, as Chief Financial Officer of Home Interiors &
Gifts, Inc., (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

        (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending March 31,
2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: May 12, 2003

                                                     /s/ Kenneth J. Cichocki
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Kenneth J. Cichocki
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
IGD 1001: ESOHMS POLICY

A. PURPOSE

This IGD ensures the continual development, review, and approval of the DLA-SM

Environmental, Safety, and Occupational Health Management System (ESOHMS) Policy 

Statement. This IGD applies to all DLA-SM personnel (HQ and Depots), those working 

on our behalf, and all applicable business units, and ensures that we adhere to the 

ESOHMS Policy Statement. The ESOHMS Policy Statement is reviewed at least 

annually by the Administrator and will be modified, as appropriate, to achieve the DLASM ESOHMS objectives. 

B. PROCESS

1. ESOHMS Policy Statement

The ESOHMS Policy Statement establishes the framework for DLA-SM 

environmental, safety, and occupational health functions and activities. The 

ESOHMS Policy Statement provides the foundation for controlling the 

environmental impacts; safety and occupational health risks of its activities;

commodities; and services; and establishes ESOHMS objectives. The key 

elements of the ESOHMS Policy Statement include:

a. Addressing the ESOHMS Policy’s support of mission objectives.

b. Complying with the requirements of all relevant ESOH laws, regulations,

and other requirements, and DLA-SM policies and procedures.

c. Fostering a dialogue with employees, those persons working on behalf of 

the government within DLA-SM, and the public, regarding the potential 

impact of our operations, including host and tenant agencies as 

appropriate.

d. Promoting a safe and healthy work environment by eliminating hazards 

and reducing ESOH risks and promoting pollution prevention through 

environmental stewardship.

e. Continually improving environmental, safety, and occupational health 

performance through training and integrating environmental, safety, and 

occupational health considerations for our business planning processes.

2. Communication of the ESOHMS Policy Statement

The ESOHMS Policy Statement will be communicated and made available, 

through various media, to all employees, those working on our behalf, 

contractors, tenants, hosts, and external constituencies, as applicable.

C. SUPPORTING ESOHMS DOCUMENTS

1. DLA-SM ESOHMS Policy Statement

2. DLA-SM ESOH Management Plan
“Any reproduction of this document may not reflect the current version. Please refer to 

the ‘I Am The Key’ website for the most current version.”
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

 Federal Maritime Commission.

# Time and Date:

 January 14, 2009-10 a.m.

# Place:

 800 North Capitol Street, NW., First Floor Hearing Room, Washington, DC.

# Status:

 A portion of the meeting will be in Open Session and the remainder of the meeting will be in Closed Session. 

# Matters To Be Considered:

## Open Session

(1) Budget Status Report.

(2) Docket No. 02-15 Passenger Vessel Financial Responsibility—Request of Commissioner Brennan.

##  Closed Session

(1) FMC Agreement No. 201199: Port Fee Services Agreement.

(2) FMC Agreement No. 011223-043: Transpacific Stabilization Agreement.

(3) Staff Briefing Regarding Global Economic Downturn and Potential Impact on Stakeholders.

(4) Internal Administrative Practices and Personnel Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information:

 Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, (202) 523-5725.

Karen V. Gregory,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-408 Filed 1-7-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4676 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4676

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study to determine 
  the feasibility and suitability of designating the 9-11 Memorial in 
West Orange, New Jersey, as a unit of the National Park System, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2006

 Mr. Pascrell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study to determine 
  the feasibility and suitability of designating the 9-11 Memorial in 
West Orange, New Jersey, as a unit of the National Park System, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE STUDY REGARDING THE 9-11 MEMORIAL IN 
              WEST ORANGE, NEW JERSEY.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the 
State of New Jersey, shall carry out a study regarding the suitability 
and feasibility of designating the the 9-11 Memorial in West Orange, 
New Jersey, as a unit of the National Park System.
    (b) Study Process and Completion.--Except as provided by subsection 
(e) of this section, section 8(c) of Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-
5(c)) shall apply to the conduct and completion of the study required 
by this section.
    (c) Submission of Study Results.--Not later than 3 years after the 
date that funds are made available for this section, the Secretary 
shall submit to the Committee on Resources of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of 
the Senate a report describing the results of the study.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EARTHWEB
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          29,370                  25,579
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,661                   1,144
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,513                  27,265
<PP&E>                                           4,865                   2,069
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  97,169                  30,477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,897                   3,559
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            98                      79
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,860                  26,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    97,169                  30,477
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,653                     944
<CGS>                                            3,078                     601
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,784                   2,741
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 258                      42
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,951)                 (2,356)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,951)                 (2,356)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,951)                 (2,356)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.93)                  (0.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.93)                  (0.70)


</TABLE>
≥95% (42 awardees)

75% - 94% (12 awardees)

50% - 74% (1 awardee)

25% - 49% (1 awardee)

<25% (0 awardees)

No IIS (0 awardees)

No data (0 awardees)

Percentage of children aged < 6 years participating in an immunization 

information system -- United States, five cities§, and D.C., 2021

National Participation: 98% (excluding Territories)

Source: CY2021 IISAR

§ Chicago, IL; Houston, TX; New York City, NY; Philadelphia, PA; San Antonio, TX.
No. 11-609.

#### Hamid Amini, Petitioner v. City of Minneapolis, Minnesota.

565 U.S. 1178, 132 S. Ct. 1144,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1018,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1018.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 643 F.3d 1068.