alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
24 January 2013 *********************************

NSN: 8960-01-613-1443 (BPTP) *MONOGRAPH NO: MCW/LRP 47

*********************************

Item: Beverage powder, Carbohydrate, Tropical punch, Fortified with ascorbic acid, vitamin D, 

and fiber, and enhanced with maltodextrin (Flavor 5, Formulation c)

Document: PCR-B-055, Beverage Powder, Carbohydrate, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf 

Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 180 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Powdered product: Uniformly blended, free flowing, homogenous, dry mixture.

Rehydrated product: Clear to slightly cloudy, sediment-free, light red color liquid.

Odor: Powdered product: Typical of flavor specified.

Rehydrated product: Tropical fruit blend.

Flavor: Powdered product: Typical of flavor specified.

Rehydrated product: Tropical fruit blend.

Texture: Powdered product: Free of hard lumps.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Powdered product: Lumpy or caked, not free flowing. 

Rehydrated product: Darkened color, settling or undissolved material.

Odor: Perfume, not tropical fruit, oxidized vitamins.

Flavor: Perfume, lack of tropical fruit flavor, lack of sweetness, extreme bitterness or sourness, 

oxidized and or excessively strong vitamin flavor.

Texture: Settling or undissolved material when rehydrated, produces an astringent mouth feel.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Initial exam shall be done in the dry state. For final exam, prepare beverage in accordance with package 

directions. Check package seal integrity for poor seals due to improper sealing or product in seal area.
24 January 2013 *********************************

NSN: 8960-01-613-1443 (BPTP) *MONOGRAPH NO: MCW/LRP 47

*********************************

Special Notes

Service is significantly affected if the powder is caked. Caking is an indication of high moisture levels, 

absence of anticaking ingredient and/or extremely high storage temperatures, i.e., over 125°F for more 

than one month.
#### Thomas Awning and Tent Company, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Nichols Ullendorff Realty Company, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February 24, 1926.

*Johnson & Mcllvaine,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Graniling & Clarkson,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Kenneth J. Cichocki, as Chief Financial Officer of Home Interiors &
Gifts, Inc., (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sections 1350, as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending September
30, 2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  November 6, 2003

                                              /s/ KENNETH J. CICHOCKI
                                              ----------------------------
                                              Kenneth J. Cichocki
                                              Chief Financial Officer
No. 11-363 (R46-005).

#### Amgen Inc., Petitioner v. New York, et al.

565 U.S. 1103, 132 S. Ct. 993,

181 L. Ed. 2d 570,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 9021.

December 27, 2011.

The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in the above-entitled case was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46 of the Rules of this Court.

Same case below, 652 F.3d 103.
# C_2016477EN.01000302.xml

| 21.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 477/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 477/3

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2016/C 477/05)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 14.11.2016 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 14.11.2016-31.12.2016 |
| Member State | France |
| Stock or Group of stocks | PLE/7HJK. |
| Species | Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) |
| Zone | VIIh, VIIj and VIIk |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 37/TQ72 |

Date and time of closure

14.11.2016

Duration

14.11.2016-31.12.2016

Member State

France

Stock or Group of stocks

PLE/7HJK.

Species

Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa)

Pleuronectes platessa

Zone

VIIh, VIIj and VIIk

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

37/TQ72

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2016236EN.01000501.xml

| 30.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/5

---

Special Report No 14/2016

‘EU policy initiatives and financial support for Roma integration: significant progress made over the last decade, but additional efforts needed on the ground’

(2016/C 236/07)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 14/2016 ‘EU policy initiatives and financial support for Roma integration: significant progress made over the last decade, but additional efforts needed on the ground’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu or on EU Bookshop: https://bookshop.europa.eu

---
JUAN S. BROWN and ALISHA N. BROWN

,
Appellant s ,

v.

SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., et al.,

Appellee s

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 1 6

- 28 14

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 3, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Nassau County

. Adrian G. Soud , Judge

.

Brian Korte and Scott J. Wortman of Korte & Wortman, P.A., West Palm Beach

, for Appellant s

.
Erin M. Berger of Kelley Kronenberg, Tampa , for Appellee Suntrust Mortgage,
Inc.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE

, KELSEY, and JAY, J J

., CONCUR.
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $7.28 CWT 0.965 $7.0252

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.6804 LB 3.5 $9.3814

Class I Price $16.4066

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $6.67 CWT 0.965 $6.4366

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.8580 LB 3.5 $10.0030

Class I Price $16.4396

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT ($0.0329)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.0028)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.0014)

Price change per quart ($0.0007)

Price change per pint ($0.0004)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.0003)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.0002)

Price change per half pint ($0.0002)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.00)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.00)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.00)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.00)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.00)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.00)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.00)

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: Nov. 5, 2017
| (logo) ncb  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011 Crystal  Drive  Suite, 8oo  Arlington, Virginia 22202 |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|

FORM OF ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

CERTIFICATION

 

 

BANK 2017-BNK7, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-BNK7 (the “Trust”) 

 

I, Karyn Mann, on behalfNational Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB Special Servicer (the “CertifyingServicer”), certify to Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. andits officers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent thatthey will rely upon this certification, that:

 

1.     I(or Servicing Officers under my supervision) have reviewed the CertifyingServicer’s activities during the preceding calendar year between January 1,2017 to December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”) and the CertifyingServicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

 

2.     Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement inall material respects during the Reporting Period.  

 

 

Date:  February 6,2018

 

 

NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK,N.A.,as NCB Special Servicer

 

 

By:/s/ Karyn Mann

Name: Karyn Mann

Title: Senior Vice President
#### Orcutt v. State

2016 MT 260N

DA 15-0648

10/11/16

Affirmed

Dist. 7 (Dawson)
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-2307

___________________________

United States of America,

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,

v.

Nicholas Anthony Garcia,

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Council Bluffs

____________

Submitted: January 15, 2019

Filed: January 28, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Nicholas Garcia directly appeals the sentence the district court imposed after 1

he pleaded guilty to drug and firearm offenses. His counsel has filed a brief under

The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the

1

Southern District of Iowa.
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sentence as substantively

unreasonable.

After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose an

unreasonable sentence. The district court properly considered the factors set forth in

18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and the sentence it imposed was below the advisory guideline

range. See United States v. Torres-Ojeda, 829 F.3d 1027, 1030 (8th Cir. 2016). 

Having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________

-2-
No. 11-7430.

#### Daniel Jimenez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1131, 132 S. Ct. 1050,

181 L. Ed. 2d 771,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 253.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 436 Fed. Appx. 378.
12 June 2020 *************************

NSN: 8925-01-512-7627 (PCOP) MONOGRAPH NO. M8O6

 *************************

Item: Pan coated candy, Oval/Round, Milk chocolate with peanuts (Type IV, Style B, Flavor 1)

Document: CID A-A-20177F, Candy and Chocolate Confections and PKG & QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 220 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

The pan coated candy shall have a candy shell with a high gloss and the colors shall be 

vibrant (high chroma) and uniform (not mottled) in hue. The chocolate oval/round 

candies shall have a roasted peanut center coated with milk chocolate and covered with a 

thin candy shell. The candies shall consist of at least five different colors.

Odor: Slightly sweet, milk chocolate, peanut.

Flavor: Slightly sweet, milk chocolate, peanut.

Texture:

Crunchy exterior coating with a firm, slow melting, smooth once melted center with a firm 

crunchy peanut. Not easily crushed or cracked.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance:

Hairline cracking of pan coating (see Special Notes), crushed, mottling and dulling of 

color.

Odor: Rancid, stale musty or other non-typical odor.

Flavor: Rancid, stale musty or other non-typical flavor.

Texture: Coating: moderately hardened to point of imparting discomfort to the user when chewing. 

Peanut: soft, not firm and crunchy.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

N/A
12 June 2020 *************************

NSN: 8925-01-512-7627 (PCOP) MONOGRAPH NO. M8O6

 *************************

Special Notes

Hairline cracking should not be scored as a defect unless it is associated with texture, odor, or flavor 

changes. Score any organoleptic changes as defects and note checking in remarks. The candy is not vitamin 

fortified and should not possess a medicinal odor or flavor.
### Federal Aviation Administration



# FAA Streamlines UAS COAs for Section 333

? Search:
News type:

News & Updates Search

The Federal Aviation Administration has established an interim policy to speed up airspace authorizations for certain commercial unmanned aircraft (UAS) operators who obtain Section 333 exemptions. The new policy helps bridge the gap between the past process, which evaluated every UAS operation individually, and future operations after we publish a final version of the proposed small UAS rule. Under the new policy, the FAA will grant a Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA) for flights at or below 200 feet to any UAS operator with a Section 333 exemption for aircraft that weigh less than 55 pounds, operate during daytime Visual Flight Rules (VFR) conditions, operate within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the pilots, and stay certain distances away from airports or heliports: 5 nautical miles (NM) from an airport having an operational control tower; or 3 NM from an airport with a published instrument flight procedure, but not an operational tower; or 2 NM from an airport without a published instrument flight procedure or an operational tower; or 2 NM from a heliport with a published instrument flight procedure The “blanket” 200-foot COA allows flights anywhere in the country except restricted airspace and other areas, such as major cities, where the FAA prohibits UAS operations. Previously, an operator had to apply for and receive a COA for a particular block of airspace, a process that can take 60 days. The agency expects the new policy will allow companies and individuals who want to use UAS within these limitations to start flying much more quickly than before. Section 333 exemption holders will automatically receive a “blanket” 200 foot COA. For new exemption holders, the FAA will issue a COA at the time the exemption is approved. Anyone who wants to fly outside the blanket parameters must obtain a separate COA specific to the airspace required for that operation. Get more information on the FAA and UAS (http://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/uas/) on our website.Page last modified: March 24, 2015 12:46:43 PM EDT 

### This page was originally published at: https://www.faa.gov/news/updates/?newsId=82245
Exhibit 35.7  LOGO ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE OF LNR PARTNERS, LLC The undersigned, Job Warshaw,
being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the Special Servicer), as special servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject to any
limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:  1.
A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1,
2018 and ending on December 31, 2018 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule I hereto) (the Reporting Period), and of the Special Servicers performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made
under my supervision; and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122
of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  LNR PARTNERS, LLC, a Florida
limited liability companyBy:

\s\ Job WarshawJob WarshawPresident
 Dated: February 19, 2019   1601 Washington Avenue  Suite 700  Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164 Telephone: (305) 695-5600  Fax: (305) 695-5601




---

Schedule I WFCM 2017-C39 Wells
Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2017-C39, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-C39 ( 225 & 233 Park Avenue South into CGCMT 2017-P8) Fitch Ratings Inc. 33 Whitehall Street Attention: Commercial Mortgaged Surveillance New York NY 10004 General Contact Kroll Bond Rating Agency, Inc., 845 Third Avnue, 4th Floor Attention: CMBS Surveillance New York NY 10022 General Contact Moodys Investors Service, Inc. 7 World Trade Center 250 Greenwich Street Attn: Commercial Mortgage Surveillance
Group New York NY 10007 General Contact Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. c/o Wells
Fargo Securities, LLC 375 Park Avenue, 2nd Floor J0127-023 New York NY 10152 A.J. Sfarra Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. Wells Fargo Law Department D1053-300 301 South
College St., Charlotte NC 28288 Jeff D. Blake Wilmington Trust, National Association 1100 North Market Street Wilmington DE 19890 Group Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. 388 Greenwich
Street, 11th Floor New York NY 10013
No. 11-456.

#### Rebekah Villafana, Petitioner v. Earl Smith.

565 U.S. 1111, 132 S. Ct. 1006,

181 L. Ed. 2d 735,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 119.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
No. 11-7540.

#### Terrance Barker, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.

565 U.S. 1181, 132 S. Ct. 1149,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1023,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 921.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office, denied.

Same case below, 998 A.2d 1028.
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

 

 ************************** 

 MONOGRAPH NO: BD3 

 ************************** 

ITEM: Walnut Tea Cake, Type 1, Flavor 7, Tray Pack 

SPECIFICATION: PCR C 024 POLY TRAY NSN: 8920 01 503 0696 

COMPONENT CLASSIFICATION: Primary 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM: 

APPEARANCE: Off white to ivory color interior with a golden top. Dark grayish 

brown walnut pieces. Dense uniform crumb. 

 ODOR: Sweet vanilla, slight walnut aroma. 

FLAVOR: Sweet vanilla and walnut. 

TEXTURE: Soft dense moist cake. Moist yet firm walnuts. 

 ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36 months 

 100 DEGREES F: 6 months 

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES: 

 AAPPEARANCE: Darkening of interior and exterior of cake and nuts. 

ODOR: Stale, oxidized, or rancid and bitter walnut. 

 FLAVOR: Off, oxidized, rancid, or stale and rancid walnut. 

 TEXTURE: Dry cake. Sticky surface. Nuts may become soft and chewy. 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None. 

SPECIAL NOTES: None
No. 11-5980.

#### Steve Starbala, et ux., Petitioners v. Homecomings Financial Network, Inc.

565 U.S. 1159, 132 S. Ct. 1091,

181 L. Ed. 2d 983,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 718.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Connecticut denied.

Same case below, 125 Conn. App. 901, 10 A.3d 1109.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3612 

To repeal a section of the FAST Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 2, 2019 

Mr. ALLRED introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To repeal a section of the FAST Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL. 

4 Section 1438 of the FAST Act (Public Law 114–94; 

5 129 Stat. 1432), and the item relating to that section in 

6 section 1(b) of that Act, are repealed. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
No. 10-1417.

#### Fein, Such, Kahn and Shepard, PC, Petitioner v. Dorothy Rhue Allen.

565 U.S. 1177, 132 S. Ct. 1141,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1016,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 918.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 629 F.3d 364.
### REGULATORY EVALUAnON

Directorateldentifier: 201O-NM-OI7-AD

Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? YES ( )explain NO (X) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Isthe AD significant? YES ( )explain NO (X) Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have asignificant economic impact on asu stantial number of small entities? YES () explain 

### NO (X) Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation 

### inAlaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated inAlaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES () explain 

### NO (X)