alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
!""#$%&'

()!*)+!( ,*-./012234516378

9!!)#:  !*; <!#:./0=>?7@>?1A/>7BC8 

D!! EF=GHI>@77>H5=JA>KHL>1>71AMN/OP=M78

 Q:

!*;

R

-)Q

  

#.LSS/TSUVW8

XXYZ
[\\

	




R ]^_`abc_defa_g_hibjklkm`mkbdki`f_dh_h`ii_mnbgm^kdom_fpqr]^_^beg`dhh`m_is_lknk_hnbgg_l_ksmbntnn_gi ki_um_dh_hv R wxy%z"{z"y|"|

%}E&~#x"}z"$"zz"}%}z"$"}w&wy&$|"x}""}"y&"z%z"x%$w&wzzw%yy|"y|"yzy"}x Q) :)Q#+*Q

! +*  !*++)!* :!)Q- :) w}z"%zwx"y|"yz%

|"xw}"z%&y"y%"}$}"|xwzz"|x&&y""|"z"$"}%}$"zz"}}%w|"|"&z"$"}%}$"zz"}'"x}""}"y&"z%z"x%$w&wzzw%y

y|zwx"y|"yzy|wx}"&"w"|}w%}z%z"%"ywy%}y||z"x"&ww"|

 &%w"x%z""y|"yzE~#&'y%$"|wy}"&"wz%zwx"y|"yz%y"&&%%z"%"}xwzz"|

"}xxz&'y%$"|"}"&"wz%zwx"y|"yz}w%}z%z"%}y||z"x"&ww"|wyz"x%$w&wzzw%y%}x"y|"|%y"%z"%$$%wy"z%|x

)***./0@7J4@7M8

+!+!!!)*)!).L27540K1J>?=@4>K8++!! ++



#+#)#!  Q+!+!EIJ5?1I5?1A7I4A21K4A=00457H122@=2@41>4=A

M1>7H7>5G~! +*)!)+)+:  ;;E~

+!!)**QQ!*)!))+: 

Y\%yz}&z%} wxy%z wx}"w}"|z%xwyzwx|%&"yzy|}"z}y &%w"xz%wxxwy%w&"

!*  E@1A47M6KPI75>4=A?71M4AIH4A53JM4AI=3454>1>4=A5=A>@15>IJ675>B1>>7@?7@7071I4637G8

ul_sm`isgbckh_h^_g_kdv`jjm_gfi`dhlbdhkmkbdibnm^_hblef_dmg_n_g_dl_hkdom_fbgpv`i^_g_mbnbg_l^`d _hvg_f`kdiedl^`d _h`dhkdnejjnbgl_`dh_nn_lmr

,Q !.TK27=@2@4A>8

!<,¡¡,¡D<

*}"w%x"|wzw%yyx$"


	¢£E¡D;~

*}"x&}w"|! ED ~,;;

,#  9#)!! 

.L4A1>J@7=027@I=A1J>?=@47M>=I4A8 .L4A1>J@7=0P=A>@15>4A00457@8

9Q  .TK27=@2@4A>8

E~#&%$"zwyz"xDy|,y|}"z}ywy

Q*!)**

 !)#!!

<##!)

*+QQ*+*¤¡,¤9

,! 9!

+.L27540K>K27=0B=M40451>4=A1AM1J>?=@4>K8

<;

; 

!""zz&"|%yzwyzw%y!""zEx~

ER~

+

¤ !Q

¤#ELSS/TSUVV~

X¢YZ
\\
[	

	



Y

	
Z

Y

¥X¦Y

\§X	¢
	
 





 !
" 	

	 "##!####$%##!&





'()*+,-./,-.0(+*1.-+00+2(,-.03



400+2(,-.05678/+0-/90+0-,-.01:;1<=>+.?@+?-



'(-@8/+0-/*0+0-,-.01:A1<=B+.?@+?-+00+2(,-.0<-C)*-*0(-21<<-*81./).?B+.?@+?-).0(-*1B)2)0+0)1.+./)*

).21<81<+0-/).010(-*1B)2)0+0)1.C)+0()*+,-./,-.0D



'(-2B1*).?/+0-(+*.10E--.-F0-./-/D



4BB10(-<0-<,*+./21./)0)1.*<-,+).@.2(+.?-/D
	
 

 
	

	



 !"#

$%#&' !"#

()*+,-.,/0 
,1(23( 
444-52.(54	.2

.(3(0.4/647/+84920:;2:

(

..2*<3(0.-52.(5

	.2.(3(0./67/+8

920:;2:(-56
No. 09-778.

#### Saint-Gobain Corporation, Petitioner v. Gemtron Corporation.

559 U.S. 992, 130 S. Ct. 1739,

176 L. Ed. 2d 213,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2207.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 572 F.3d 1371.
WebFilings | EDGAR view


 


Exhibit 10.06 
 
2011 INVESTMENT ELECTION FORM
Valero Energy Corporation
Deferred Compensation Plan
 
Direction of Investments
 
The undersigned Participant hereby directs that the measurement of the Participant's account be determined as if it were invested in the fund options as indicated below.
 
              DEFERRALS OF SALARY AND/OR BONUSES BEGINNING 1/1/2011
                 WILL BE TREATED AS IF INVESTED AS INDICATED BELOW.
 
                       Enter your investment elections: 5% minimum/increments of 5%.
                                           The total of the percentages must equal 100%.
                     You may invest in any one or more (including all) of the fund options.
 
_ _ _ _ _%     Dreyfus Appreciation (DGAGX)
 
_ _ _ _ _%     Fidelity Intermediate Government (FSTGX)
 
_ _ _ _ _%     Janus Worldwide (JAWWX)
 
_ _ _ _ _%     Milestone Funds Treasury Obligations Portfolio (MTIXX)
 
_ _ _ _ _%     Oakmark I (OAKMX)
 
_ _ _ _ _%     Price Mid-Cap Growth (RPMGX)
 
_ _ _ _ _%     Columbia Income Z (SRINX)
 
_ _ _ _ _%     Vanguard Asset Allocation (VAAPX)
 
_ _ _ _ _%     Vanguard Index Extended Market (VEXMX)
 
_ _ _ _ _%     Vanguard Index 500 (VFINX)
 
_ _ _ _ _%     Vanguard Growth and Income (VQNPX)
________
 100  %
 
 
I understand that the elections I have chosen on this form shall remain in effect until I make a directive to change.
			
	 
	 
	 

	Participant's Signature
	 
	Date

	 
	 
	 

	«First_name» «Last_name»
	 
	«Emplid»

	Participant's Name
	 
	Participant's Employee ID Number
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. §1350

In connection with the quarterly
report of Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William B. Olson,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.

Date: December 17, 2007



/s/ WILLIAM B. OLSONWilliam B. OlsonChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-7375

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

NORWOOD COOK, 

Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Harrisonburg. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (5:02-cr-30087-JPJ-1) 

Submitted: February 21, 2023 Decided: February 24, 2023

Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Norwood Cook, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7375 Doc: 6 Filed: 02/24/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM: 

Norwood Cook appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for relief from 

its November 19, 2020, order denying his motion for reconsideration of its May 21, 2020, 

order forfeiting a substitute asset under 21 U.S.C. § 853(p) and Fed. R. 

Crim. P. 32.2(e)(1)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Cook, No. 5:02-cr30087-JPJ-1 (W.D. Va. Oct. 28, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7375 Doc: 6 Filed: 02/24/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
No. 09-8471.

#### Artis Eugene Slade, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 957, 130 S. Ct. 1554,

176 L. Ed. 2d 143,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1199.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 346 Fed. Appx. 948.
No. 09-8553.

#### Robert Paladino, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 960, 130 S. Ct. 1561,

176 L. Ed. 2d 147,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1412.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 8514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4019]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

[Docket ID: USA-2008-0078]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by March 
27, 2009.
    Title, Form, and OMB Number: Transportation Discrepancy Report; DD 
Form 361; OMB Control Number 0702-0124.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 1,434.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 1,434.
    Average Burden per Response: 1 hour.
    Annual Burden Hours: 1,434.
    Needs and Uses: DD Form 361 is essential for documenting any loss, 
damage, or other discrepancy, which may result from the movement of 
Government freight by commercial transportation companies (carries). 
The form is ordinarily completed by the Federal agencies for which the 
transportation service is provided. However, in a small minority of 
cases (Approximately 9%), contractor personnel acting for the 
government may be required to complete this form.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Seehra at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503. You may also submit comments, 
identified by docket number and title, by the following method:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DoD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 
22209-2133.

    Dated: February 19, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
 [FR Doc. E9-4019 Filed 2-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4785 

To make available funds included in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 

for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981 program 

for fiscal year 2006, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2006 

Ms. DELAURO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To make available funds included in the Deficit Reduction 

Act of 2005 for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981 program for fiscal year 2006, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT 

4 OF 2005. 

5 Section 9001 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 

6 is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a)— 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4785 IH 

1 (A) by striking ‘‘for a 1-time only obliga2 tion and expenditure’’; 

3 (B) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘fiscal 

4 year 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2006’’; 

5 and 

6 (C) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘fiscal 

7 year 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2006’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘September 

10 30, 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2006’’. 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4659 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4659

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
To amend the USA PATRIOT ACT to extend the sunset of certain provisions 
                              of such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE USA PATRIOT ACT.

    Section 224(a) of the Uniting and Strengthening America by 
Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct 
Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001 (Public Law 107-56; 115 Stat. 
295) is amended by striking ``February 3, 2006'' and inserting ``March 
10, 2006''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
No. 11-6408.

#### Matthew Burl Martin, Petitioner v. Texas.

565 U.S. 1040, 132 S. Ct. 587,

181 L. Ed. 2d 432,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8191.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
No. 11-7672.

#### David Michael Wilkerson, Petitioner v. Florida.

565 U.S. 1168, 132 S. Ct. 1117,

181 L. Ed. 2d 998,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 873.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District, denied.

Same case below, 65 So. 3d 585.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 151 (Thursday, August 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 41997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20979]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 151 / Thursday, August 6, 1998 / 
Notices

[[Page 41997]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service


Notice of Intent to Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service intends to grant to Dalya 
dis Ticaret ve Pazarlama of Istanbul, Turkey, an exclusive license to 
U.S. Patent No. 5,766,662, issued June 16, 1998, and entitled, 
``Dietary Fiber Gels for Preparing Calorie Reduced Foods.'' Notice of 
Availability for this invention was published in the Federal Register 
on January 8, 1998.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 5, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of the Director, 
National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, Room 2042, 1815 
N. University Street, Peoria, Illinois 61604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Watkins of the National Center 
for Agricultural Utilization Research at the Peoria address given 
above; telephone: 309-681-6545.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights to 
these inventions are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license these inventions as Dalya dis Ticaret ve 
Pazarlama has submitted a complete and sufficient application for a 
license. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and 
will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 
404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within 
sixty (60) days from the date of this published Notice, the 
Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and argument 
which establishes that the grant of the license would not be consistent 
with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.
Richard M. Parry, Jr.,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 98-20979 Filed 8-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
No. 09-657.

#### Birmingham Board of Education, Petitioner v. Cathy McCord-Baugh.

559 U.S. 937, 130 S. Ct. 1514,

176 L. Ed. 2d 111,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1315.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama denied.

Same case below, 65 So. 3d 493.
No. 09-8259.

#### Mike Redford, Petitioner v. Gwinnett County Judicial Circuit, et al.

559 U.S. 968, 130 S. Ct. 1702,

176 L. Ed. 2d 177,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1915.

March 1, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305, and cases cited therein.

Same case below, 350 Fed. Appx. 341.
# C_2016345EN.01000201.xml

| 21.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 345/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 345/2

---

Notice for the attention of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 and in Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

(2016/C 345/02)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities designated in Annexes II and IV to Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 (1), as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2016/1694 (2), and in Annex III to Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1687 (4), concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya.

1

2

3

4

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons and entities designated in the abovementioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/137/CFSP (5) and in Council Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 (6) should continue to apply to those persons and entities.

5

6

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex IV to Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 8 of the Regulation).

The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council before 1 June 2017, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered. Any such request should be sent to the following address:

before 1 June 2017

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DGC 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DGC 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, in accordance with Article 17(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 and Article 21(6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/44, of the list of designated persons and entities.

---

(1)  OJ L 206, 1.8.2015, p. 34.

1

(2)  OJ L 255, 21.9.2016, p. 33.

2

(3)  OJ L 12, 19.1.2016, p. 1.

3

(4)  OJ L 255, 21.9.2016, p. 12.

4

(5)  OJ L 58, 3.3.2011, p. 53.

5

(6)  OJ L 58, 3.3.2011, p. 1.

6

---
# C_2016393EN.01000301.xml

| 25.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 393/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 393/3

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting of 7 July 2014 regarding a draft decision relating to Case AT.39612(2) — Perindopril (Servier)

Rapporteur: Austria

(2016/C 393/03)

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that fines should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that fines should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines for Servier. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines for Servier.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s approach to base the calculation of fines for the generic undertakings on the value transferred. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s approach to base the calculation of fines for the generic undertakings on the value transferred.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines for the generic undertakings. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines for the generic undertakings.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the Commission’s Decision in its entirety. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the Commission’s Decision in its entirety.

| 6. | The Advisory Committee recommend the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The Advisory Committee recommend the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal.

---
No. 11-7079.

#### Robert Anthony Winters, Petitioner v. Susan Hubbard, et al.

565 U.S. 1123, 132 S. Ct. 1025,

181 L. Ed. 2d 756,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 189.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 626.
No. 09-7924.

#### K. E. H., Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.

559 U.S. 945, 130 S. Ct. 1517,

176 L. Ed. 2d 124,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1363.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office, denied.

Same case below, 974 A.2d 1182.