alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Date: 28 November 2023 ********************

NSN: 8940-01-711-1383 (YCRC) *MONOGRAPH 1B11 

 ******************** 

Item: Yellow curry with rice, chicken, and vegetables, cooked, dehydrated

Document: PCR-Y-001, Yellow Curry with Rice, Chicken, and Vegetables, Cooked, Dehydrated, 

Packaged in a Boil-In-Bag (BIB)

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 200 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Dehydrated product: Cooked mixture of white rice, chicken, peas, red bell peppers, 

cauliflower, zucchini, and onions covered in a yellow curry sauce powder.

White rice: Cooked, long grain parboiled, off-white colored rice.

Chicken: Cooked, off-white to tan color, fibrous pieces.

Vegetables: Cooked, green peas; red bell pepper pieces; light to medium tan colored 

cauliflower florets and pieces; Cooked green colored zucchini slices; cooked white to 

off-white colored onion pieces. 

Yellow curry sauce: Medium golden-yellow color with flecks of herbs and spices, freeflowing powder. May contain some clumps.

Rehydrated product: Mixture of white rice, chicken, peas, red bell peppers, cauliflower, 

zucchini, and onions in a yellow curry sauce.

White rice: Off-white colored, distinct long grain rice grains.

Chicken: Off-white to tan color, distinct pieces.

Vegetables: Green peas; red bell pepper pieces; light to medium tan colored 

cauliflower florets and pieces; green colored zucchini slices; translucent white to offwhite colored onion pieces.

Yellow curry sauce: slightly smooth, slightly thick, semi-translucent yellow-tan color 

with flecks of herbs and spices.

Odor:

Dehydrated product: Moderate curry spice and slight cooked chicken.

Rehydrated product: Cooked mild to moderate yellow curry, white rice, chicken, pea, 

red bell pepper, cauliflower, zucchini, and onion and a slight coconut milk.

Flavor:

Rehydrated product: Cooked mild to moderate yellow curry, white rice, chicken, pea, 

red bell pepper, cauliflower, zucchini, and onion and a slight coconut milk; shall elicit 

sensation of moderate heat.

Texture:

Dehydrated product: No wet or soft spots indicating incomplete dehydration.

Rehydrated product: Rice and chicken pieces moist and tender; sauce smooth and 

slightly thick; vegetables soft and tender.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Dehydrated and rehydrated product: Excessive darkening or loss of color of sauce, rice, 

chicken, or vegetables.

Odor: Dehydrated and rehydrated product: Cardboard, oxidized, stale, rancid, scorched, 

burnt.

Flavor: Dehydrated and rehydrated product: Cardboard, oxidized, rancid, scorched, burnt, 

bitter vegetables, loss of yellow curry.

Texture:

Dehydrated product: Very hard components.

Rehydrated product: Product not rehydrated, excessive syneresis; Chicken: chewy, dry, 

or mushy; Vegetables: mushy or tough.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures: N/A
Date: 28 November 2023 ********************

NSN: 8940-01-711-1383 (YCRC) *MONOGRAPH 1B11 

 ******************** 

Special Notes: N/A
No. 11-7275.

#### Nicholas E. Purpura, et al., Petitioners v. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al.

565 U.S. 1127, 132 S. Ct. 1037,

181 L. Ed. 2d 764,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 180,

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 446 Fed. Appx. 496.
No. 11-7221.

#### Roselio Garcia-Aguilera, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1087, 132 S. Ct. 834,

181 L. Ed. 2d 540,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8764.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 441 Fed. Appx. 161.
Date: 28 November 2023 *********************

NSN: 8950014871626 (PHSS) * MONOGRAPH M9J2

 *********************

Item: Powdered hot sauce seasoning, conventional, spice blends

Document: Packaging Requirements and Quality Assurance Provisions for CID A-A-20001 

Spices and Spice Blends 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 5 Component Classification: Ancillary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Dark reddish-orange color, free-flowing, granular powder, with some dark specks.

Odor: Pungent vinegar and fermented cayenne pepper.

Flavor: Moderately salty, dry aged peppers, sour vinegar, and garlic.

Texture: Free-flowing powder.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkened or clumped.

Odor: Oxidized; loss of pungent vinegar or fermented cayenne pepper.

Flavor: Oxidized; loss of pungent vinegar or fermented cayenne pepper.

Texture: Clumped (not free-flowing).

Unique Examination/Test Procedures: “Not free-flowing” may be defined as containing lumps that 

cannot be broken apart with light pressure.

Special Notes: N/A
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 12
 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 12
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 12
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 12
 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 12
 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 12
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 12
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 12
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 12
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 12
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 12
 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 12
No. 11-6798.

#### Larry M. Schlee, Petitioner v. Jessie Williams, Warden.

565 U.S. 1117, 132 S. Ct. 1006,

181 L. Ed. 2d 745,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 315.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7464

BOBBY JENKINS, a/k/a Ali Muqtadir,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TRACY SMITH; J. REUBEN LONG DETENTION CENTER,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

JAMES GALMOUR,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge.

(CA-00-22-3-23BC)

Submitted: February 8, 2001 Decided: February 14, 2001

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bobby Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se. Alexia Pittas-Giroux, STUCKEY LAW

OFFICES, P.A., Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Bobby Jenkins, a South Carolina inmate, appeals the district

court’s order denying his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 2000). Jenkins’ case was referred to a magistrate

judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate

judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Jenkins that

the failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could

waive appellate review of a district court based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Jenkins failed to timely object to

the magistrate judge’s recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s

recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the

substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v.

Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Jenkins waived appellate review by failing to timely file objections after receiving proper notice. We

accordingly dismiss the appeal as frivolous. We deny the motion

for preparation of transcript at government expense. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
CYBER MERCHANTS EXCHANGE, INC.

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Frank S. Yuan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Cyber Merchants Exchange,  Inc.
(the "Registrant");

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e))  for the  registrant  and have: a)
designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such  disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which  this  report is being  prepared;  b)  evaluated  the
effectiveness  of  the  registrant's  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  and
presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions  about  the  effectiveness  of the
disclosure controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such  evaluation;  and c) disclosed in this report any change in
the registrant's  internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,  or is
reasonably  likely to affect,  the registrant's  internal control over financial
reporting; and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or  persons   performing  the  equivalent   functions):   a)  all   significant
deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the design or  operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the  registrant's  ability to record,  process,  summarize and report  financial
information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other  employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: November 15, 2004

/S/ FRANK S. YUAN
-----------------------------
FRANK S. YUAN
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
(PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
# C_2016246EN.01000401.xml

| 7.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/4

---

Special Report No 15/2016

‘Did the Commission effectively manage the Humanitarian aid provided to populations affected by conflicts in the African Great Lakes Region?’

(2016/C 246/05)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 15/2016 ‘Did the Commission effectively manage the Humanitarian aid provided to populations affected by conflicts in the African Great Lakes Region?’ has just been published.

‘Did the Commission effectively manage the Humanitarian aid provided to populations affected by conflicts in the African Great Lakes Region?’

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu or on EU Bookshop: https://bookshop.europa.eu

---
No. 11-7218.

#### Darryl Wayne Gardner, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1086, 132 S. Ct. 834,

181 L. Ed. 2d 540,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8786.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 444 Fed. Appx. 361.
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350 (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In connection with the periodic report of Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Alan P. Niedzwiecki, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Date: December 5, 2002





/s/    ALAN P. NIEDZWIECKIAlan P. Niedzwiecki Chief
Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. §1350



In connection with the quarterly report of Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William B. Olson, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This Certification has not been, and shall not be
deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.



|                    |  |                                                       
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 9, 2005 |  |                                                       
|                    |  | /s/ WILLIAM B. OLSON                                  
|                    |  | William B. Olson Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



29
combustionsurvey

- Fw: Comments by the Rubber Manufactuers Association on the liquid fuel

subcategory in Boiler MACT

-----Forwarded by Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/ 16/2011 03:39PM -----

To: Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Sarah Amick" <SAmick@rma.org> Date: 07/15/2011 03:54PM Subject: Comments by the Rubber Manufactuers Associ ation on the liquid fuel subcategory in Boiler MACT (See attached file: Comments by the Rubber Manufact urers Association on the liquid fuel subcategory in Boiler MACT.pdf)

The Rubber Manufacturers Association appreciates the opportunity toprovide a dditional information related to the Liquid Fuel subcategory in the NationalEmission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Major Sources: Industrial,Commercial, and Institutional Boiler s and Process Heaters (Boiler MACT).

If you have any questions regarding the attached analysis, please feelfr ee to contact me.

Thank you,

Sarah E. Amick

Environmental Counsel

Rubber Manufacturers Association

1400 K Street, NW

Suite 900

Washington, DC 20005 From: Brian Shrager <Shrager.Brian@epamail.epa.gov> To: <combustionsurvey@erg.com> Date: 7/16/2011 3:39 PM Subject: Fw: Comments by the Rubber Manufactuers Association on the liquid fuel s ubcategory

in Boiler MACT Attachments: Comments by the Rubber Manufacturers Association on the liquid fuel subca tegory in

Boiler MACT.pdf Page 1 of 2

8/2/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settings\GGibson\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpw ise\4E21B0B6DO

...tel (202) 682-4836

samick@rma.org

= Page 2 of 2

8/2/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settings\GGibson\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpw ise\4E21B0B6DO

...
Zhejiang Yong Xing Digital Technology
Co. Ltd.


Share-holding Entrustment Agreement


 


Zhejiang Yong Xing Digital Technology Co.
Ltd. (“Zhejiang”) was organized on July 11, 2005. This entrustment agreement (hereinafter called as “this agreement”)
was signed by following parties (hereinafter called as “agreement parties”)


 


Party A: Capital Future Development
Limited (“Capital”) was lawfully established on July 22, 2004. Capital has the right to enjoy the actual shareholder’s
rights and has the right to obtain any benefits Party B received from Zhejiang.


 


Party B: Zhengsheng Bao is a citizen
of PRC, his national ID number is ________________________________. Zhengsheng Bao is the nominal holder of 10% equity of Zhejiang.


 


		I.	Being as the actual investor of share-holding on behalf of the holder, Party A has the right to enjoy
actual shareholder’s rights and has the right to obtain relevant investing income received by Party B.



		II.	Party A will take the full legal and economic responsibilities in association with the acquisition
of Zhejiang’s equity as well as executing the share-holding entrustment.



		III.	Party A is the actual owner of Zhejiang’s equity. Party B will hold the shares on behalf of
Party A. Party B will follow Party A’s command to perform all the relevant procedures to complete the share-holding entrustment.



		IV.	Any modification or cancellation for this agreement will go into effect only after both parties have
signed the written agreement. Any party can not modify or cancel this agreement without consent of the other party. When the agreement
parties have disputes with respect to interpretation and implementation of items of this agreement, all parties shall settle disputes
through friendly negotiation. Either party can seek arbitration to make a settlement per Hongkong rules and law if the disputes
can’t be settled through negotiation. The arbitration locale is Hongkong.



		V.	This agreement is in duplicate and each party holds one. This agreement will go into effect since
Party A’s authorized representative affixes the signature and the official seal and Party B Together affixes the signature.



 


Party A: Capital Future Development
Limited (stamp)


Authorized representative:/s/ Zhenggang Wang
(signature)


 


Party B: Zhengsheng Bao: /s/ Zhengsheng Bao(signature)
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the periodic report of CelLynx Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kevin Pickard, Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the
date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of
the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.




Date:
      February 23, 2009
            
            /s/
      Kevin PickardKevin
      Pickard
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2017173EN.01008201.xml

| 31.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 173/82 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/82

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 87/217/EEC of the Council, Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directive 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Regulation (EU) No 1257/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directive 86/278/EEC and Directive 94/63/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards procedural rules in the field of environmental reporting and repealing Council Directive 91/692/EEC

(COM(2016) 789 final — 2016/0394 COD)

(2017/C 173/14)

| Consultation | European Parliament, 13 February 2017
  Council of the European Union, 20 February 2017 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Article 192(1) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Section for Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment |
| Adopted at plenary | 22 February 2017 |
| Plenary session No | 523 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 178/1/2 |

Consultation

European Parliament, 13 February 2017

Council of the European Union, 20 February 2017

Legal basis

Article 192(1) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Section for Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment

Adopted at plenary

22 February 2017

Plenary session No

523

Outcome of vote

(for/against/abstentions)

178/1/2

Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier Opinion 1491/90 adopted on 18 December 1990 (*1), it decided, at its 523rd plenary session of 22 and 23 February 2017 (meeting of 22 February 2017), by 178 votes to 1 with 2 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text and to refer to the position it had taken in the abovementioned document.

*1

Brussels, 22 February 2017.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Georges DASSIS

---

(*1)  EESC Opinion 1491/90 on the proposal for a Council Directive harmonizing and rationalizing reports on the implementation of certain Directives relating to the environment (OJ C 60, 8.3.1991, p. 15).

*1

---
No. 11-6664.

#### Mary L. Cook, Petitioner v. Chase Bank, et al.

565 U.S. 1081, 132 S. Ct. 819,

181 L. Ed. 2d 530,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8680.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 09-7862.

#### Martin Christian Sorlien, Petitioner v. Michigan.

559 U.S. 944, 130 S. Ct. 1513,

176 L. Ed. 2d 122,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1107.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.