alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016216EN.01000601.xml

| 16.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 216/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/6

---

Notification on behalf of the Irish Government pursuant to Article 10(2) of Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and the Council (‘Gas Directive’) concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas regarding the designation of Gas Networks Ireland as a Transmission System Operator — Gas TSO

(2016/C 216/03)

Following the certification of Gas Networks Ireland as Ownership Unbundled Transmission System Operator (Article 9 of the Gas Directive), the Commission for Energy Regulation (CER), as Ireland’s National Regulatory Authority, has notified to the Commission the official approval and designation of this company as a Transmission System Operator operating in accordance with Article 10 of the Gas Directive.

Any additional information can be obtained at the following address:

http://www.cer.ie/ (Ref: CER/16/113)

---
No. 09-8732.

#### Jose Juan Serrano-Meza, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 985, 130 S. Ct. 1720,

176 L. Ed. 2d 201,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1975.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 334 Fed. Appx. 717.
Specimen form of Certificate for CU Bancorp Common Stock



 Exhibit 4.1 
 



 
  
 Exhibit
4.1 
 November 16, 2011 
 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 
 No.                           Shares 

CU BANCORP 
 Authorized: 75,000,000 Shares Common Stock 
 THE
SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE BEEN ISSUED UNDER THE LIMITED OFFERING EXEMPTION PROVIDED BY SEC. 25102(f) OF THE CALIFORNIA CORPORATIONS CODE. 
 This Certifies that                          is the record holder of
                     Shares of Common Stock transferable only on the books of the corporation by the holder hereof in person or by attorney upon
surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. 
 A statement of the rights, preferences, privileges, and
restrictions granted to or imposed upon each class or series of stock of the Corporation and upon the holders thereof may be obtained by any stockholder, upon request and without charge, at the principal office of the Corporation. 

In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and its
Corporate Seal to be hereunto affixed this                  day                  of
             A.D.                  
 SECRETARY                      PRESIDENT 

COMMON 







 



 
  
 For value
received                  hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 
 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 
 (NAME AND ADDRESS OF TRANSFEREE SHOULD BE PRINTED OR TYPEWRITTEN) 
                              Shares evidenced by
the within Certificate and, if required, do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint                  Attorney to transfer the said Shares on the books of the
Corporation, with full power of substitution in the premises. 
 Dated
                 Transferor 
 In
presence of              
 NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE OF
THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE. IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
No. 09-791.

#### Mark Anthony Lewis, Petitioner v. Bell Atlantic/Verizon, et al.

559 U.S. 973, 130 S. Ct. 1707,

176 L. Ed. 2d 183,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2071.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 321 Fed. Appx. 217.
No. 11-7755.

#### Ronald W. Collins, Petitioner v. E. K. McDaniel, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 1182, 132 S. Ct. 1153,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1025,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 965.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
WebFilings | EDGAR view


 


 
 
Exhibit 10.1
 
Summary of 2011 Named Executive Officer Cash Compensation
 
The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors has approved 2011 base salaries for our named executive officers in amounts unchanged from 2010, as set forth below.
 
The Compensation Committee has also approved a process for the determination of 2011 cash bonuses for our named executive officers, pursuant to which bonuses, if any, will be determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee based on the achievement of certain corporate goals and individual performance in 2011.  The corporate goals include objectives relating to the development of existing drug candidates, the identification of additional drug candidates and the achievement of certain financial and business goals.  Achievement of these corporate goals will be evaluated by the Compensation Committee in making determinations regarding bonuses for 2011 performance.  However, the Compensation Committee retains broad discretion over the amount and payment of cash bonuses and is not bound by any pre-determined agreement, formula or other standard with respect to such decisions.
 
The Compensation Committee has established a bonus target, expressed as a percentage of base salary, for each of our named executive officers, assuming full achievement of corporate goals and a high level of individual performance.  The bonus target percentages for each of our named executive officers are unchanged from 2010, as set forth below.
 
								
	Name and Position
	 
	2011
Base Salary
	 
	2011
Bonus Target

	Arthur T. Sands, M.D., Ph.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer
	 
	$
	580,000
	 
	 
	50
	%

	Alan J. Main, Ph.D.
Executive Vice President of Pharmaceutical Research
	 
	$
	350,000
	 
	 
	35
	%

	Jeffrey L. Wade, J.D.
Executive Vice President, Corporate Development and Chief Financial Officer
	 
	$
	385,000
	 
	 
	40
	%

	Brian P. Zambrowicz, Ph.D.
Executive Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer
	 
	$
	400,000
	 
	 
	40
	%

	James F. Tessmer
Vice President, Finance and Accounting
	 
	$
	235,000
	 
	 
	25
	%
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2342

FATOU TOURE,

 Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: June 19, 2019 Decided: June 26, 2019

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville, Maryland, for 

Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Anthony C. Payne, Assistant 

Director, Kathleen Kelly Volkert, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Fatou Toure, a native and citizen of Senegal, petitions for review of an order of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen. We have reviewed 

the administrative record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discretion. See 8 

C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2019). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons 

stated by the Board. See In re Toure (B.I.A. Oct. 10, 2018). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Kenneth J. Cichocki, as Chief Financial Officer of Home Interiors &
Gifts, Inc., (the Company) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending June 30, 2004
as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: August 12, 2004 /s/ KENNETH J. CICHOCKIKenneth J. CichockiChief Financial Officer
# C_2016427EN.01000401.xml

| 19.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/4

---

Annual Report 2015

(2016/C 427/04)

On 3 May 2016, the European Ombudsman presented her Annual Report for the year 2015 to the President of the European Parliament.

The Annual Report is available on the European Ombudsman’s website in all 24 official languages at: http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/activities/annualreports.faces

---
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned ChiefFinancial Officer of Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterlyperiod ended January 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of theCompany.

Date: March 19, 2007
|          | /s/ Edward O. Irion       |   |
|----------|---------------------------|--------|
|     |                      |
|     | Edward O. Irion           |
| * * | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

1

----
WebFilings | EDGAR view


 


 
 
EXHIBIT 10.13
 
_________ __, 2011
 
[NAME]
[ADDRESS]
 
Re:     Letter Agreement Regarding Change of Control Vesting
 
Dear [NAME]:
 
This letter (“Letter Agreement”) confirms our mutual agreement regarding vesting acceleration of your equity awards with respect to Informatica Common Stock in the event of a change in control transaction.  
 
In connection with your services, you have been granted certain stock options and/or other equity awards under Informatica Corporation's stock plans (the “Awards”).  The Awards are subject to the terms of your individual Award agreements and the terms of our 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan, our 1999 Stock Incentive Plan and/or our 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plans”).
 
Notwithstanding the vesting provisions of your Award agreements, upon a change of control transaction (as such concept is defined in the relevant Plans governing your Awards), you will receive immediate vesting as to one hundred percent (100%) of the unvested shares of Informatica Common Stock subject to your Awards that are outstanding as of the change in control transaction.
 
This executed Letter Agreement constitutes an amendment to the terms of your outstanding Award agreements and will be appended to such agreements as maintained in the Company's files.  Please retain a copy for your own records.  This Letter Agreement, together with the Award agreements, to the extent not amended hereby, represents the entire agreement and understanding between the parties as to the subject matter herein and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous agreements whether written or oral.  No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this Letter Agreement will be binding unless in writing and signed by duly authorized representatives of the parties hereto.
 
This Letter Agreement and the rights and obligations of the parties hereunder will inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, their respective successors, assigns, and legal representatives.
 
This Letter Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which will be an original, with the same effect as if the signature thereto were upon the same Letter Agreement.  
 
This Letter Agreement will be interpreted and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California (with the exception of its conflict of laws provisions).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

1


 


 
 
Please sign below to indicate your agreement to the terms of this Letter Agreement. 
 
Sincerely, 
 
INFORMATICA CORPORATION
 
By ______________________________
 
Name: ___________________________
 
Its: ______________________________
 
 
AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:
 
 
_________________________________
[NAME]
 

2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4725 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4725

            To terminate the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2006

Mr. Goodlatte (for himself, Mr. Peterson of Minnesota, Mr. Neugebauer, 
 Mrs. Jo Ann Davis of Virginia, Mr. Tancredo, Mr. Hefley, Mr. Bartlett 
of Maryland, Mrs. Biggert, Mr. Goode, Mr. Mica, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. 
Tiahrt, Mr. Barrett of South Carolina, Mr. Chocola, Mr. Bonner, and Mr. 
 Hostettler) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To terminate the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tax Code Termination Act''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986.

    (a) In General.--No tax shall be imposed by the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986--
            (1) for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2009; 
        and
            (2) in the case of any tax not imposed on the basis of a 
        taxable year, on any taxable event or for any period after 
        December 31, 2009.
    (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to taxes imposed 
by--
            (1) chapter 2 of such Code (relating to tax on self-
        employment income);
            (2) chapter 21 of such Code (relating to Federal Insurance 
        Contributions Act); and
            (3) chapter 22 of such Code (relating to Railroad 
        Retirement Tax Act).

SEC. 3. NEW FEDERAL TAX SYSTEM.

    (a) Structure.--The Congress hereby declares that any new Federal 
tax system should be a simple and fair system that--
            (1) applies a low rate to all Americans;
            (2) provides tax relief for working Americans;
            (3) protects the rights of taxpayers and reduces tax 
        collection abuses;
            (4) eliminates the bias against savings and investment;
            (5) promotes economic growth and job creation; and
            (6) does not penalize marriage or families.
    (b) Timing of Implementation.--In order to ensure an easy 
transition and effective implementation, the Congress hereby declares 
that any new Federal tax system should be approved by Congress in its 
final form no later than July 4, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-5936.

#### David Derringer, Petitioner v. Arizona, et al.

565 U.S. 980, 132 S. Ct. 501,

181 L. Ed. 2d 354,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7754,

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 11-7303.

#### David Lynn Scott, Petitioner v. California.

565 U.S. 1162, 132 S. Ct. 1103,

181 L. Ed. 2d 988,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 793.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.

Same case below, 52 Cal. 4th 452, 129 Cal. Rptr. 3d 91, 257 P.3d 703.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Venture Lending & Leasing IX, Inc. (the "Fund") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin D. Eng, Chief Financial Officer of the Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Fund.





/S/ Martin D. Eng





Martin D. Eng


Chief Financial Officer


March 16, 2018
No. 09-8272.

#### Laureano Chirino Rivera, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 952, 130 S. Ct. 1539,

176 L. Ed. 2d 134,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1495,

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 348 Fed. Appx. 461.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 38 (Friday, February 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 8961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4205]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or To Acquire Companies That Are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. [thinsp]225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board 
has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and 
permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than March 16, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Steve Foley, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. Educational Services of America, Inc. and Educational Funding of 
the South, Inc., both of Knoxville, Tennessee, to engage in community 
development activities, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(12) of Regulation 
Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 24, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-4205 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 21

- 00106

- CR

IN RE Andre SCALES , Relator

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Irene Rios , Justice Beth Watkins , Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 14, 2021

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

Relator has filed a petitio n for writ of mandamus. We have the power to issue writs of

mandamus when “agreeable to the principles of law regulating those writs.” T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE

§ 22.221(b). For mandamus, a relator has the burden to file a petition and record show ing the trial

court abused its discretion and that no adequate legal remedy exists

. See State ex rel. Young v.

Sixth Judicial Dist. Ct. of Appeals a t Texarkana , 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007)

. Having reviewed the petition, we conclude relator has not satisfied th is burden. Accordingly, we

deny the petition. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBISH

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011CR8106 , styled State v. Scales , pending in the 227th Judicial District Court
, Bexar County, Texas , the Honorable Kevin M. O ’ Connell presiding.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANDRE WARE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 231 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANDRE WARE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 232 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of February, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
# C_2018346EN.01024801.xml

| 27.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/248 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/248

---

P8_TA(2017)0387

Authorising France to apply a reduced rate of certain indirect taxes on ‘traditional’ rum produced in Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique and Réunion *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 October 2017 on the proposal for a Council decision amending Council Decision No 189/2014/EU authorising France to apply a reduced rate of certain indirect taxes on ‘traditional’ rum produced in Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique and Réunion and repealing Decision No 2007/659/EC (COM(2017)0297 — C8-0212/2017 — 2017/0127(CNS))

(Special legislative procedure — consultation)

(2018/C 346/42)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2017)0297), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2017)0297),

| — | having regard to Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0212/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0212/2017),

| — | having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development (A8-0304/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development (A8-0304/2017),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

4.

---
No. 09-402.

#### Markice Lavert McCane, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 970, 130 S. Ct. 1686,

176 L. Ed. 2d 179,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2009,

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 573 F.3d 1037.
No. 11-7949.

#### Quinton L. Brown, Petitioner v. Scott Fisher, Warden.

565 U.S. 1185, 132 S. Ct. 1156,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 979.

181 L. Ed. 2d 1031,

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 11-6238.

#### Stephen Richards Barker, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1084,

181 L. Ed. 2d 802,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 472.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

*803Former decision, 565 U.S. 987, 132 S. Ct. 519, 181 L. Ed. 2d 365, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7763.