alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 17

- 1737

___________ ANTHONY PARKER,

Appellant v. LEHIGH COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS COURT

____________________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 5

- 17

- cv - 00564) District Judge: Honorable Mitchell S. Goldberg

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34. 1(a)

August 16, 2017 Before: SHWARTZ, COWEN and FUENTES, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: August 17, 2017 )

___________ OPINION *

___________ PER CURIAM In February 2017, Anthony Parker filed a civil rights complaint in the District Court against the Domestic Relations s ection of the Family Division of the Lehigh

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.2

County Court of Common Pleas (“Family Court”). Parker claimed that the Family Court had violated his constitutional rights by dismissing his petition to modify his support order and seizing money from his bank a ccount. Parker asked the District Court to order the Family Court to reopen the support proceedings so that he could lodge various objections. The District Court dismissed the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) because, among other reasons, Parke r’s claims were barred by the Rooker

Feldman doctrine. Parker appealed. 1 We will affirm the District Court’s judgment. The District Court lacked jurisdiction under the Rooker

- Feldman doctrine to review, either directly or indirectly, the Family Court ca se. See Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus. Corp. , 544 U.S. 280, 284 (2005) (explaining that the Rooker

- Feldman doctrine bars suits “brought by

state

- court losers complaining of injuries caused by state

- court judgments rendered before the district cou rt proceedings commenced and inviting district court review and rejection of those judgments”).

1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We exercise plenary review over the District Court’s sua sponte dismissal under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). See Allah v. Seiverling , 229 F.3d 220, 223 (3d Cir. 2000).
# C_2016417EN.01000703.xml

| 11.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 417/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 417/7

---

EUROPEAN MARITIME SAFETY AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2015

(2016/C 417/26)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.emsa.europa.eu/emsa-documents/financial-documents/26-financial-statements.html

---
# Figure 1

# Figure 1
EXHIBIT
      31.01





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Power Technololgy, Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ended April 30, 2005, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
      each
      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      June 20, 2005





/s/ Bernard J. WalterBernard J. Walter, President, Treasurer
              andChief
                Financial Officer
No. 09-8658.

#### Saladean Walker Salean, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 961, 130 S. Ct. 1566,

176 L. Ed. 2d 150,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1300.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 583 F.3d 1059.
No. 11-6062.

#### Patrick W. Carey, Petitioner v. Tom Roy, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 1186, 132 S. Ct. 1164,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1057.

181 L. Ed. 2d 1033,

January 23, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 983, 132 S. Ct. 508, 181 L. Ed. 2d 358, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7864.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                                             5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                      1,000

<S>                                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                              APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                              126
<SECURITIES>                                                      2,650
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       892
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  4,025
<PP&E>                                                            4,683
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   10,313
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             3,545
<BONDS>                                                             841
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                             21
<OTHER-SE>                                                       20,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     10,313
<SALES>                                                           4,836
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  4,836
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     7,536
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   68
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  (2,700)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              (2,700)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     (2,700)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       (1.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     (1.08)





</TABLE>
No. 11-5719.

#### Gerard D. Grandoit, Petitioner v. Bank of America.

565 U.S. 1078, 132 S. Ct. 836,

181 L. Ed. 2d 524,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8710.

December 5, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
Before the U.S. Department of Transportation 

Federal Aviation Administration 

In the matter of 

PINNACLE AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA Docket No. CP09SO0002 

Judge Isaac D. Benkin 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

RECEIVED 

DEC 1 6 2009 

HEARING DOCKET 

fM-ZOoq-oi8o 

Pursuant to § 13.233(a) of the FAA Rules of Practice, Pinnacle Airlines, Inc. hereby gives 

notice that it appeals the vwitten initial decision of the administrative law judge served on 

December 14, 2009, assessing a civil penalty of $200,000 in the above-captioned matter. 

Dated: December 15, 2009. 

Respectfully submitted, 

PINNACLE AIRLINES, INC 

-—J 

W. Chris Harrison (TN Bar #018689) 

PINNACLE AIRLINES, INC., 

IN-HOUSE COUNSEL 

1689 Nonconnah Blvd., Suite 111 

Memphis, TN 38132 

Tel. (901) 348-4100 

Fax (901)348-2493 

Email: charrison(a),flvpinnacle.com 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing will be sent via 

FedEx to the following: 

Hearing Docket Clerk 

Federal Aviation Administration 

AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

600 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

And by e-mail and regular U.S. Mail to the following: 

Isaac D. Benkin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings 

Department of Transportation (M-20) 

Room El2-320 

1200 Ne Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

David.Benkin@dot.gov 

Laura Ponto, Attorney 

Enforcement Division/AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Coimsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Laura.Ponto@faa. gov 

This the 15*'' day of December, 2009. 

W. Chris Hamson
# C_2016481EN.01000601.xml

| 23.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 481/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 481/6

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2373, apply

(2016/C 481/04)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 (2), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2373 (3).

2

3

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2373.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (4).

4

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 344, 28.12.2001, p. 70.

2

(3)  OJ L 352, 23.12.2016, p. 31.

3

(4)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

4

---
No. 11-8003.

#### In re Alexis Ayala, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 1155, 132 S. Ct. 1132,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1010,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 608.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
No. 11-532.

#### General Motors Corporation, Petitioner v. Michigan Department of Treasury.

565 U.S. 1178, 132 S. Ct. 1143,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1018,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1004.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.

Same case below, 290 Mich. App. 355, 803 N.W.2d 698.
BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N WASHINGTON , D . C . 

### MEN TO F .SPORTATtO N ' ^ OPERATiCN S \ Y- ~ Ai0:2 b

Motio no f AMERICA NEAGL E AIRLINES , INC . fo r confidentia l treatmen t unde r Rul e 1 2 (For m41 , Schedul e B-7 ) DOT-OST-1995-56 9

MOTIO NO F AMERICA

NEAGL E AIRLINES , INC . FO RCONFIDENTIA L TREATMEN T UNDE RRUL E 1 2 America nEagl e Airlines , Inc. , unde r 1 4 CF R302.12 , herebymove s tha t it s Form41 , Schedul e B- 7 fo r 1Q201 1 b e accorde d confidentia l treatmen t and b e withhel d frompubli c disclosure . Th e informatio nfo r whic hconfidentia l treatmen t i s requeste d pertain s t o America n Eagle' s airframe s and air

craf t engin e acquisition s and retirements .

I naccordanc e wit hth e Department' s Fina l Rul e onSub

mittin g Airlin e Dat a vi a th e Internet , 7 5 Fed . Reg . 41580 , 41582 , w e ar e uploadin g ou r confidentia l repor t electronicall y t o th e followin g website : http://esubmit.rita.dot.go v OnJun e 5 , 1995 , Jame s W . Mitchell , Director , Offic e o f Airlin e Statistics , th e Departmen t grante d confidentia l treat
men t fo r a 10-yea r perio d t o simila r dat a file d b yAmerica n Airlines . Fo r th e reason s state d i n Mr . Mitchell' s letter , th e Departmen t shoul d gran t th e same relie f here .BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMENT O F TRANSPORTATIO N WASHINGTON , D . C .

Motio no f AMERICA NEAGL E AIRLINES , INC . fo r confidentia l treatmen t unde r Rul e 1 2 (For m 41 , Schedul e B-7 ) DOT-OST-1995-56 9

MOTIO NO F AMERICA

NEAGL E AIRLINES , INC . FO RCONFIDENTIA L TREATMENT UNDE RRUL E 1 2 Communication s wit hrespec t t o thi s documen t shoul d b e sen t to ; DANIE L P . GARTONCAR L B . NELSO N Presiden t Associat e Genera l Counse l America nEagl e Airlines , Inc . America nAirlines , Inc . P.O . Bo x619616 , M D 549 4 110 1 17t hStreet , N.W . DF WAirport , Texa s 7526 1 Suit e 60 0 Washington , D.C . 2003 6 KATHLEE NSOLE D (202 ) 496-564 7 Vic e Presiden t & Genera l Counse l carl.nelson@aa.co m America nEagl e Airlines , Inc . P.O . Bo x619616 , M D 549 4 DF WAirport , Texa s 7526 1 (817 ) 967-157 4 kate.soled@aa.co m Ma y3 , 201 1- 2

WHEREFORE , America n Eagl e move s tha t it s B- 7 fo r 1Q201 1 b e withhel d frompubli c disclosur e unde r Rul e 1 2 fo r a perio d o f 1 0 years . Respectfull ysubmitted . 

# GM> M StL J

CAR L B . NELSO N Associat e Genera l America nAirlines , O nbehal f Counse l Inc . o f America nEagl e Airlines , Inc . Ma y3 , 201 1
No. 09-8265.

#### Glenn Dell Cook, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 952, 130 S. Ct. 1538,

176 L. Ed. 2d 134,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1439.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 344 Fed. Appx. 473.
* Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 13, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-31050

EUGENE RATLIFF, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus BREAUD CANTU, A JOINT VENTURE; HENRY ESTLE;

BREAUD SERVICES, INC., Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

(02-CV-913)
Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

AFFIRMED
. See 5 TH C IR . R. 47.6.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6879

(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN, FCI Beckley,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at 

Beckley. Frank W. Volk, District Judge. (5:22-cv-00138)

Submitted: September 5, 2023 Decided: September 11, 2023

Before KING, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6879 Doc: 12 Filed: 09/11/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey, a District of Columbia offender, seeks 

to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge 

and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition without prejudice. The order is not appealable 

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1); Madley v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 278 F.3d 1306, 1310 (D.C. Cir. 2002); cf.

Jones v. Hendrix, 143 S. Ct. 1857, 1864, 1868 (2023); In re Wright, 826 F.3d 774, 783 (4th 

Cir. 2016). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard 

by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment of the 

constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate 

both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 

140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Owlfeather-Gorbey 

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, 

deny the pending motion, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6879 Doc: 12 Filed: 09/11/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
### Faulk, Scott (OST)

From: Subject: EAS (OST) Makani Kai

From: IFCCadmin [mailto:admin@islandfamily
. org] Sent: Wednesday, October 30 , 2013 3:44 PM To: EAS COST) Cc: EAS COS T) Subject: Makani Kai

Aloha, Please keep Makani Kai ' s air service to Kalaupapa. They provided essential service to the Patients as well as the local communities, and have affordable fees. With all my 20 plus years of flying to Kalaupapa, I have thoroughly enjoyed flying with Makani Kai , a local company that has roots deep in Hawaii ' s economy . If there is anything we could do to help in renewing this contract we would definitely vouch for this company . Thank you , and aloha. Pamela M. Garza Pamela M. Garza Office Administrator Island Family Christian Church 3375 Salt Lake Blvd Honolulu, HI 96818 Ph: 808-422-7811 Fax: 808-422-8788

1
Sunvalley Solar Inc.


398 Lemon Creek Suite A, Walnut, CA 91789


Tel: (909)598-0618 Fax: (909)598-6633


 


Date: 12/21/2011


 


Private Loan Agreement


 


Due to the rapid business development,
the Company needs funds for operation and inventory purchase. The Board of Directors authorize James Zhang (CEO/Chairman) on behalf
of the Company, to sign a short term loan agreement with Hangbo Yu (Shareholder/General Manager). The loan amount is $50,000. The
start day will be the day that $50,000 is transferred to the Company's account. The annual interest for this short-term loan is
$6.50% and the term of this loan should be less than a year.


 


Borrower:


 


/s/ James Zhang


James Zhang


CEO


 


Sunvalley Solar Inc.


 


 


Lender:


 


/s/ Hangbo Yu


Hangbo Yu
# C_2017447EN.01011001.xml

| 29.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 447/110 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 447/110

---

Corrigendum to the Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 August 2016 to 31 August 2016 (Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 362 of 30 September 2016
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 362 of 30 September 2016

(2017/C 447/03)

On page 9:

| for: | ‘Withdrawal of a marketing authorization (Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)’, |
| --- | --- |

for:

for:

‘Withdrawal of a marketing authorization (Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)’,

Withdrawal of a marketing authorization

| read: | ‘Suspension of a marketing authorization (Article 45 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)’. |
| --- | --- |

read:

read:

‘Suspension of a marketing authorization (Article 45 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)’.

Suspension of a marketing authorization

---
Exhibit 35.27



|     |  |                                                                                                           |  | 
|---- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing D1050-084, 8th Fl 401 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |  | 



ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 30, 2017, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase
Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Servicer, Aegon USA Realty Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust,
National Association, as Trustee and Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC, as Operating Advisor , with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2017-245P (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise
defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 13.7 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive
Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from May 30, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period
has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of
February 2018.



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|LOGO                                                  
|Daniel Bober Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO