# •

WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF 

# ECOL 0 GY



# • Washington State 1989 Hazardous Waste Annual Report 

# Summary

September 1992 Publication 92-89 printed on recycledpaper

# •

•

• Washington State 1989 Hazardous Waste Annual Report 

# Summary

Prepared by the Washington State Department ofEcology Hazardous Waste Information and Planning Section

September 1992



### printedon recycledpaper

# •

• TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF TABLES ii LIST OF FIGURES iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY v CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Organization of the 1989 Annual Report Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. 1 1.2 Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. 1 1.3 Information Quality and Methodology ofData Review 3 1.4 Dangerous Waste Designation Process 4 CHAPTER 2. DANGEROUS WASTE GENERATION 2.1 Number of Reports by Generator Category, 1987-1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. 7 2.2 Number of Generating Sites by Industry Group, 1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. 10 2.3 Generators Filing Annual Reports by County, 1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. 12 2.4 Overall Trends in Waste Generation, 1987-89 14 2.5 Recurrent Waste Generation, 1987-89 16 2.6 RCRA vs. State-only Recurrent Waste, 1987-89 : . . . . .. 18 2.7 Recurrent Waste Generated by Industry Group, 1989 , 20 2.8 Top 25 Recurrent Waste Generators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. 22 2.9 Recurrent Waste Generation by County, 1989 24 2.10 Recurrent Waste Recycled On-site by County, 1989 26 2.11 Permit-by-rule Waste Generation by County, 1989 30 CHAPTER 3. DANGEROUS WASTE MANAGEMENT 3.1 1989 Washington Management Facility Demographics 34 3.2 Waste Management Methods at Washington Facilities, 1989 . . . . . . . . .

.. 36 3.3 On-site Management of Dangerous Waste, 1989 38 3.4 Washington Dangerous Waste Imports, 1989 40 3.5 Washington Dangerous Waste Exports, 1989 42 3.6 Net Flows of Dangerous Waste, 1989 44 APPENDIX A. DATA TABLES A-I Recurrent Waste Generated by County, 1988-1989 A-2 Net Flows of Dangerous Waste, 1989 (Tons) APPENDIX B. USEPA AND WASHINGTON STATE-QNLY WASTE CODES APPENDIX C. FORM EXAMPLES Form 4 Form 5

• GLOSSARY

i

## TABLE 

## LIST OF TABLES

TITLE PAGE 

# o

i

II 

# I i' 

# I ' I i 

### A B 

## c D E 

### F G H I


### A-I 

### A-2 Number of Generating Sites by Industry Group, 1989

. Overall Trends in Waste Generation, 1987-89 Tonnages

. Recurrent Waste Generated by Industry Group, 1989

. Top 25 Recurrent Waste Generators, 1989

. Recurrent Waste Recycled On-site by County in 1989

. Wastewater Generated under Permit-by-rule by Industry Group . Top 15 Permit-by-rule Waste Generators

. Washington Commercial Management Facilities, 1989

. Waste Management Methods at Washington Facilities, 1989 Tonnages
Recurrent Waste Generated by County, 1988-1989
Net Flows ofDangerous Waste, 1989 (Tons)



### ii 11
14
21 23 29 32 33 35 36 

# 0



# o

## LIST OF FIGURES
TITLE 

## PAGE



# • Waste Designation Flowchart

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 5 Annual Reporters by Generator Category, 1987-89 9 Generators Filing Annual Reports by County, 1989 " 13 Overall Trends in Waste Generation, 1987-89 : '.'

.. 15 Recurrent Waste Generation, 1987-89

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 17 RCRA vs. State-only Recurrent Waste, 1987-89· " 19 Recurrent Waste Generation by County, 1989 .

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 25 Recurrent Waste Recycled On-site by County, 1989 . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. 27 Permit-by-rule Waste Generation by County, 1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. 31 Waste Management Methods at Washington Facilities, 1989 . . . . . . .

.. 37 On-site Management of Dangerous Waste, 1989 39 Washington Dangerous Waste Imports,**1987~1989** 

### . " . . . . . . . . . .

.. 40 Washington Dangerous Waste Imports, 1989· '.'

. . . .. 41 Washington Dangerous Waste Exports, 1987-1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. 42 Washington Dangerous Waste Exports, 1989 43 Net Flows of Dangerous Waste, 1989 45



### iii

# • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The 1989 edition ofWashington's Annual Dangerous Waste Report Summary describes the continuing expansion of dangerous waste generation and management. Substantial growth in: 1) the number of generating sites; 2) the tonnage of dangerous waste generated; and 3) the amount ofwaste managed are found in the accompanying data analyses. Nearly 3,800 Washington sites filed Annual Reports in 1989. This presents an increase of more than 10 percent over comparable 1988 figures. Better than 20 percent, or 790, of those reporting were categorized as large quantity generators (LQG's). Greater than fifty percent ofthe LQG's were sites involved in lumber, wood products, and printing; primary and fabricated metals; equipment manufacturing; and transportation and utilities. The vast majority of these sites were located in urban areas such as King, Pierce, Spokane, and Snohomish Counties. In 1989, recurrent waste generated increased by thirty percent over 1988's level to 278.428 tons. This generation was nearly equally split between Federal and state-only regulated wastes. Eighty-five percent ofthe recurrent waste was reported by those industries closely associated with LQG's. The U.S. Department ofEnergy's Hanford Reservation was Washington's largest generator ofthis waste type with 31,995 tons. The largest share, thirtyfive percent, of all recurrent waste originated in King County. Recurrent waste recycled onsite was identified for the first time in 1989. However, only slightly more than 2,000 tons

-- less than one percent

-- were reported. Annual reports also contained data on radioactive mixed waste and permit-by-rule (PBR) wastewaters. The 32,998 tons ofradioactive mixed waste were exclusively reported by the Hanford facility - a decrease of 80 percent from 1988's figures. In contrast, PBR waste more than doubled to 4,536,866 tons between 1988 and 1989. This dramatic growth was largely due to the identification of 2,600,000 tons of wastewater generated by Shell Oil's Skagit County refinery. These same wastewaters contributed to a greater than 100 percent increase in dangerous waste managed in Washington during 1989. In excess of4,700,000 million tons were managed on-site with ninety-eight percent consisting ofPBR. Only 92,069 tons of "non-wastewaters" were treated, stored, or disposed on-site according to 1989 Form.5's. Waste imported to Washington management facilities escalated by forty percent over 1988's figures. More than sixty percent ofthe 18,783 tons imported originated in Oregon. At the same time, exports ofWashington generated waste declined fifteen percent in 1989. Once again, the vast majority

- seventy-three percent - was destined for management and eventual disposal in Oregon.



### v

# :.

I

# ,

I



# •**C~l. ~ODUCTION**  

### 1.1 OrganiZation of the 1989 Annual 

### Report StlIJlDla[y Chapter 1 of Ecology's 1989 Annual Report Summary begins with a brief overview of how waste generation and management data is collected, reviewed, and analyzed for the purposes of this 

### document. Chapter 2 entails an exhaustive review of Washington's dangerous waste generators and includes: 1) a census of the current population; 2) classification ofAnnual Reports by generator category; 3) distributions by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code and county location; and 4) comparison to prior years' data collected under a similar regulatory climate. This is followed by detailed reviews of waste categories

- recurrent, permit-by-rule, non-recurrent, and radioactive mixed. Historical trends, geographic distribution, and detailed analysis of "who generated how much of what" waste stream follow. Chapter 3 inspects the waste management side ofWashington's "cradle-to-grave" waste tracking algorithm. Distinctions are made between on-site, off-site (but still within Washington), and export as management options. Regulated waste imported to the state's management industry are also assessed at this point. ' The chapter then concludes with a look at the net flows of dangerous waste to and from Washington. This data substantiates the state's continued position among the largest exporters of its hazardous waste in the nation. In addition, a complete list ofFederal and State dangerous waste numbers used in 1989 is found following Chapter 3. Samples ofthe 1989 survey instruments have also been provided. Finally, an updated glossary of regulatory jargon and nomenclature concludes this document. Attempts to maximize the consistency of data comparisons between reporting years have limited this Summary's historical perspective to the period between 1987 and 1989. Although Ecology has collected waste generation and management information since 1982, changing regulations have established 1987 as the break point for comparable data. 

### 1.2 Objectives Throughout the eight year span of its publication, the Annual Report Summary has provided a state-wide analysis of dangerous waste generation and management data. Its purpose is to provide an overview to state and local governments, 

### the affected business community, and concerned citizens of Washington. While not intended to supply every detail on 

### each-waste stream generated or managed by all members of theregulated community, this Summary can answer the following questions. How much dangerous waste was generated in 1989 and how does this compare to recent years? Who generates the vast majority of Washington's recurrent waste streams? Where are these generators located? What types of waste are generated? How are the wastes managed?
1

# • 1.3 Infonnation Quality 

### and Methodology of Data Review The informational bases for this Summary are Ecology's Form 4, "Generator Annual Dangerous Waste Report", and Form 5, "TSD Annual Dangerous Waste Report". One, or both, of these reports are required by WAC 173-303-060 from every location having an active EPA/State site identification number (EPA ID#) during the calendar year. The Form 4 provides the following types of information: 1) a broad-based profile of the site including EPA ID#, name, location, SIC code, and regulatory status; and 2) manifest-specific waste identification data consisting of waste description, dangerous waste number(s), quantities, and identification ofthe transport and management contractors employed in handling the waste stream. Form 5 is completed by in-state treatment/storage/disposal facilities and immediate, or "24-hour", recyclers. Both forms provide for a check and balance between generator shipments and facility receipts. All completed forms are required to be postmarked by March 1 following the reporting year. When received by Ecology, the submitted report is subject to a rigorous series of hand and automated review procedures. Each and every 1989 report received thorough review for compliance with the state's Dangerous Waste Regulations as well as for technical accuracy. Ecology staff make extensive use of existing records -- crosschecking back through previous years' generation -- as well as comparing with receiving facility records. Thousands of telephone calls are made and hundreds of letters written in order to verify or complete questionable or missing data. When necessary, regional compliance inspectors are contacted for information only their experience can provide. Passage through this initial round of scrutiny moves the report toward automation. Double keypunching of all data minimizes the potential for error during this critical step. An audit trail or verification takes place so as to match up raw information with the now-automated data. At this point, the data are ready to undergo further analysis as each piece finds its place in the state-wide puzzle. Only when the picture has been pieced together does this Annual Report Summary make its appearance. By that time, the data have been subjected to 

### a minimum of five separate hand reviews, a battery of automated edits, and more than twenty computer analyses. Following review, annual report information serves as the basis for decision making throughout the Solid and Hazardous Waste (S&HW) Program. Planners find the data essential to projecting the State's future generation and need for management capacity as well as meeting Federal requirements such as Capacity Assurance Planning (CAP). Day to day S&HW Program operations such as regulatory development efforts and enforcement actions .are dependent upon these data. Other Ecology programs use this high quality information, e.g., Waste Reduction, Recycling" and Litter Control (WRRLC) 

### Program's assessment ofhazardous waste generator fees to fund technical assistance promoting waste minimization.

3**~)** 

### 1.4 Dangerous Waste Designation Process According to regulation, dangerous waste includes those solids, liquids, gases, or mixtures whose properties could put human health, property, or the environment at risk. The process of determining whether or not a material meets the definition ofdangerous waste and requires proper management is referred to as designation. Figure 1 portrays the basic steps ofthe designation process. (Details regarding designation are found in WAC 173-303-070 through -104 while an abridged discussion has been incorporated into Ecology's Guide for Hazardous Waste Generators.) The designation process can be boiled down to the following four steps: 1) lists; 2) characteristics; 3) mixtures; and 4) criteria. Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulations (40 CFR Part 261) define both lists and characteristics. Lists 

### include; 1) "Discarded Chemical Products"; 2) "Non-specific Sources"; and 3) "Specific Sources". Characteristics are wide-ranging traits of dangerous waste specifically defined in the regulations and include ignitibility, corrosivity, reactivity, and toxicity. In addition, Washington has broadened the range ofdangerous waste by regulating materials not captured by RCRA. These are referred to as mixtures and criteria

-- toxic, persistent, and carcinogenic - waste. State regulations require generators possessing "special knowledge" regarding 

# 0 the composition of their waste - or those specifically required by Ecology -- to complete designation through these steps.



# o
4Waste 01'" I::nown COf11=l0sltion

No
Listed DIscarded Chemical Product?

No
Listed Dangerous

Waste Source? es Also a Dangerous Woste "'" xture? lIE 0'" I ter ra? lIE Toxic? lIE Pers I stem? :lIE carCinogenIc?

No es or !'b

Waste Is I>bt Regulated by Ecology No Dangerous waste Mlxtlre? lIE Toxic? lIE Persistent? lIE care I nocen I c?

No
CharacteristIc DanQerous Waste? lIE Ignitable? lIE corrosIve? lIE React I ve? lIE EP ToxIcity es CharacterIstIc Dangerous Waste? 

# * Ignitable? 

# * Corrosive? lIE Reactive? 

# * EP ToxIcIty

;(es or !'b

waste Is RegUlated by Ecology



# • Figure 1. 

### Waste Designation Flowchart

# •

•

• CHAPTER 2. DANGEROUS WASTE GENERATION The "cradle-to-grave" waste tracking system implemented by Ecology matches' waste generated by thousands of sites across the state with the waste received by dozens of treatment/storage/disposal facilities and immediate recyclers. This portion of the 1989 Summary focuses its attention upon the generators' side of the equation. Initially, the demographics -- population, categorization by scale of generation, business type, and geographic distribution -- are evaluated. Some historical perspective is gained through the comparison and contrast of these indicators with like data from 1987 and 1988. This is followed by detailed analysis ofwaste categories: recurrent, permit-by-rule, non-recurrent, and radioactive mixed. 

### 2.1 Number of Reports by Generator Category, 1987-1989 Within a system as dynamic as that tracking Washington generators, several points of confusion exist regarding who's who and what's what. Subtle differences in language used while posing identical sounding questions may result in remarkably different answers. These can be found during the straightforward process of conducting a census of the regulated community. Populations of 

### handlers should correlate closely.with 

### notifierlists.· However, 

### notifiers and 

### annual reporters may have significant variation as not all nctifiers comply with regulations to submit annual reports. And, just how does the term 

### generator

-- much less 

### small, medium, or large quantity generator

-- fit in? Figure 2 begins to explain the differences between some of these labels. For the 1989 Annual Report cycle, Form 4's were received from 3,798 handlers or notifiers. This is an increase of nearly ten percent over comparable figures from 1988. While this overall growth might be termed fairly modest, changes within the specific groupings are significantly greater. Large quantity generators (LQG's) -- those sites exceeding 2,200 pounds of dangerous waste (or 2.2 pounds of acutely hazardous waste) generated or accumulated during a single calendar month

-- grew by more than twelve percent. The eighty-six' new members ofthis classification make up a significant additional workload for compliance inspectors. Percentage growth between 1988 and 1989 increases as the scale of waste generation decreases, i.e., more smaller generators have recently entered the regulated community -- to a point. More than two hundred new medium quantity generators (MQG's) -- generators or accumulators of greater than 220, but less than 2,200, pounds of dangerous waste -- reported in 1989. The number of small quantity generators (SQG's) -- those reporting generation or accumulation of less than 220 pounds of dangerous waste or 2.2 pounds of acutely hazardous waste -- has grown by more than seventy percent. However, a significant proportion of these "new" generators have likely moved out of the remaining category, that of non-generators. This group includes: 1) those sites completing their record keeping requirements for EPA ID#'s withdrawn or canceled during 1988 or 1989; 2) sites generating only exempt waste, e.g., used motor oil or polychlorinated biphenyl" (PCB) filled transformers or capacitors; 3) those handlers having an active EPA ID# solely for the purpose of transporting dangerous waste; and 4) those sites not generating or accumulating any dangerous waste during 1989. Much effort has also been expended to remove those sites having active EPA ID#'s without the documentation of any activity for several years.

7

### Conclusions to be drawn from Figure 2 include : . 1) the total number of annual reporters grew by nearly one thousand sites or 33% between 1987 and 1989; . 2) large quantity generators increased by 160 or 25% during this same time period; 3) Washington's medium quantity generator category rose by more than five hundred or 61% 

### since 1987; and 4) while small quantity generators reporting dropped by 47%, those sites reporting no generation increased by 55% through 1989.



### 8 

# c

o

o

# • • • Figure 2 

# Annual Reporters by Generator Category, 1987-89**4~OOO** 

# .... : -------------------------.



# 3,000


# rn 

# t 

# i 2,000 

# e,

1,000

Year 1987-- 1988- .- 

## 1989 _. 

## Non-gen :;:;::::::::::::: 

## 894 1,462 1,395 :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: 

## SQG**{~f:1l~l~~~~** 

## 465 143 247 

## MQG 

# .. 843 1,158 1,366 ,",.: ,.-' 

## LQG 

# - 628 704 790 Washington 2,830 3,467 3,798

### A second pattern displayed by the regulated community is that seen by using Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes. The Classification consists of a hierarchical structure beginning with 

### divisions, running through 

### majorgroups and 

### industry groups, and ending up with 

### industry codes. 

### 2.2 Number of Generating Sites by Industry Group, 1989 

# c

Double-digit SIC Codes define the major group to which a particular establishment belongs. Examples include primary metal industries (33) or electric, gas, and sanitary services (49). Addition ofthe third digit specifies an industry group such as the primary smelting and refining ofnonferrous metals (333). At its greatest level ofdetail, the fourdigit SIC Code represents a particular industry code such as primary production of aluminum (3334). Table A provides the classification of 1989 Annual Reporters by industry group (or

. three-digit SIC Code). Not surprisingly, the distribution is fairly representative of the more

prominent sectors ofthe Washington economy. Tertiary sector industry groups such as business services, wholesale and retail trade, and transportation and utilities are prominently represented. Roughly sixty percent of all reporters fall into these groups. Also quite visible are the manufacturing groups for which Washington is best known equipment manufacturing, lumber and wood products, and primary and fabricated metals. This is especially true in the evaluation oflarge quantity generators. Better than forty percent ofWashington's 790 LQG's during 1989 fell into these three industry groups.

10 

# o

o

### f,

I' f

# •

•

• TABLE A NUMBER OF GENERATING SITES BY INDUSTRY GROUP, 1989

INDUSTRY GROUP NON-GEN SQG MQG LQG TOTAL % Agriculture, forestry, fishing (01 1-(97) 31 2 12 6 51 1.3 Mining (101-149) 3 0 3 0 6 0.2 Construction (152-179) 60 3 53 33 149 3.9 Food and clothing (201-239) 12 0 27 7 46 1.2

# ~1~1~_~II.!_:III\\lIi_[I[\\1**~\!l:~[!:i[:l![!~1!l!:[[![I!::~1!~ll!'** 

# lill:i:!lli!ll:!::!,!il iiii:l!i:il!illl::ll**l!l~ilii:!i~!ili:i[ ~!~:i:ii!ii:i:!iiii::[:i_\ii** **l\i\:::j~i::::i:!\ii\** Chemicals and petroleum (281-299) 62 4 23 51 140 3.7 Rubber, plastic, leather, stone (301-329) 17 4 13 32 66 1.7

# :!ili_lltlil_i_;iilillljll~ljl:~lii**!l~~j:iiijl~illjlllii:ijlj:ililljljl ,l~::li\\l:jjjilillj!:** 

## \i\\\i\:\I\I\I~I::\lji:'

# ,1~llll~ll~!i\i:II::I\**:!l!i:l~\~::\:l~l:l!iijll~::\**

# 1\1~1~11;1\~~I\;lll :!*

__

# ::.\liiBi~it11\l!lir~~~i!!iii!:

# i!!:!~liiiiiijil:iiil!i!!!li!li!:

# 'i!!!j:::!!iiliiii**lj!ii:iiijl!iJ.lf~i: ':~iiijlj::i~jji.il:~:** **iljljl:ii~i[jj:ji!iilj::IBili:**

# ilim'ijl~:llll\:

Transportation and utilities (401-497) 294 18 48 78 438 11.5 Wholesale and retail trade (501-599) 268 18 265 67 618 16.3 Finance, insurance, real estate (601-679) 23 1 13 9 46 1.2 Business services (701-799) 212 96 456 64 828 21.8 Human services (801-899) 122 2S 89 40 276 7.3 Public administration (911-972) 147 47 97 68 359 9.5 TOTAL 1,395 247 1,366 790 3,798 00.0 PERCENTAGE 36.7 6.5 36.0 20.8 100.0

### Figure 3 presents the geographic distribution ofthe 1989 regulated community. As in past years, prominent spatial concentrations are found throughout the east side ofthe Puget Sound Basin. Centered on Seattle and King County, annual reporters are found in direct correlation with the state's population distribution. Decreasing urban densities

- associated with increased distance from the Seattle-Tacoma-Everett metropolitan area -- are seen to have fewer annual reporters. Similar peaks explained this same way are found in Spokane and Clark Counties. While Spokane literally stands isolated, Clark displays the affect of an interstate "spillover" connected to the growth ofPortland, Oregon. 

### 2.3 Generators Filing Annual 

### Reports by 

### County, 1989 

# c

Three additional counties

- Cowlitz, Whatcom, and Yakima -- exhibit secondary concentrations of annual reporters in 1989. Cowlitz can be explained as a meld of further removal from Portland's market dominance in combination with its own historical development as an industrial center in wood products and aluminum smelting. In contrast, Yakima contains the primary service center for central Washington with little, if any, competition until Spokane's influence is felt from the east. Lastly, Whateom's prominence may be primarily attributed to 

### its proximity to Vancouver - Canada's major West Coast metropolis. However, its very position astride the international boundary

. enhances Whateom's development as well. Differences in labor costs, access to raw materials, and brokering of imports and exports can all contribute to the explanation ofthis area's continued growth.

12 

# o

o

# • -**--~------------- --~-**  -- - - - --- 

## --

- 

### - 

# • • Figure 3 

# Generators Filing Annual Reports by County, 1989

I <10 

# Generators**lij:i:::i:!:::jI:i:i:j:i!iIl.~i::!i:!II** 

## 11-40 41-100 

# - >100

### 2.4 Overall Trends in Waste Generation, 1987-89 Figure 4 illustrates the trends in amounts of dangerous waste reported by generators between 1987 and 1989. While providing a three-year picture oftotal generation, the data is also disaggregated by 

### waste type. Four primary waste types have been defined and analyzed by Ecology: 1) recurrent waste derived from a generator's on-going production process; 2) permit-by-rule (PBR) wastewaters discharged under National·Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), state water quality, or local discharge permits that designate as dangerous waste prior to on-site treatment by the generator; 3) non-recurrent waste such as demolition or clean-up debris, contaminated soils, or spill materials that are accidentally or infrequently generated; and 4) radioactive mixed waste streams originate almost strictly from the United States Department of Energy's Hanford Nuclear Reservation and consist ofdesignated

. dangerous waste exhibiting low level radioactivity. (High-level nuclear waste is

regulated by Ecology's Nuclear and Mixed Waste Program and falls outside the scope of this Summary.) 

# c

Strong visual correlation is shown by the data for permit-by-rule and total waste generation. PBR's striking dominance of the waste generation picture receives further comment in Section 2.11. Recurrent waste displays constant growth during this period, while both non-recurrent and radioactive mixed waste amounts greatly from year to year. Further comments regarding these trends are found 

# .0 later in this chapter.

TABLED 

### OVERALL TRENDS IN ,WASTE 

### GENERATION, 1987-89 TONNAGES

WASTE TYPE 1987 1988 1989

.Recurrent 196,400 215,582 278,428 Radioactive mixed 47,417 179,459 32,998 Non-recurrent> 64,266 12,480 482 Permit-by-rule 1,977,205 2,166,440 4,536,866 

### TOTAL 2,285,287 2,573,961 4,848,772


# o 14

# • • • Figure 4 

# Overall Trends in Waste Generation, 1987-89 TONS

• Nonrecurrent

• Radioactive

.



# - Iliillll Recurrent

# ~~~j~j~!~~~j~: P-B-R 

# Total



# 1989 1988 

# YEAR**-------------------~- ~~~**  ...

/



# 1987 6,000,000 5,000,000 /

/ 

# 4,000,000 3,000,000 / 

# 2,000,000 1,000,000 

# 0

### Recurrent waste is the primary focus ofEcology's' Solid and Hazardous Waste Program. Federal funding, compliance inspections, and educational outreach all find their basis in the population of recurrent waste generators. While other factors**~-** 

### industry-specific campaigns, regulatory change, and public opinion -- all affect day-to-day and year-to-year operations, quantities of recurrent waste generation occupy the lion's share of Ecology's attention. Recent development of the Waste Reduction, Recycling, and Litter Control Program (WRRLC) 

### underscores the concern with this waste type. The support of technical assistance promoting waste minimization, the development ofpollution prevention planning, and the assessment of generator fees are just a few ways in which these data are used. 

### 2.5 Recurrent Waste Generation, 1987-89 

# c

Figure 5'shows:the growth in recurrent waste generation between 1987 and i989. While totaling just under 200,000 tons reported in 1987, this waste type .grew by nearly ten percent during 1988. Although a significant growth rate, this pales beside the change between 1988 and 1989. Comparison between the latter two years ofthe figure point out a nearly thirty percent increase in recurrent waste reported. While this simple fact is certainly significant, an explanation must rely upon more detailed analysis of where in Washington which industry groups generated how much recurrent waste. A caveat' regarding this rate of growth is certainly in order at this time. Annual reporting by its very nature conveniently packages an on-going process into uniform, containers of twelve months duration. Both waste manifested off site for management 

# m¥l that waste accumulated on-site at year 

# 0 end are required to be reported. However, the process of waste generation, transportation, and management may not fit neatly into these particular packages, 

### For example, generated wastes may be legally stored in some cases for years until 

### they are eventually manifested off site. Then all at once, an unusually high number ofmanifests will appear on 

### aparticular year.'s annual report. This concept of "accumulated transport" of potlining waste by aluminum smelters is partially responsible for the apparent growth between 1988 and·1989. However, the absence of complete records for earlier years prevents the accurate weighting of this particular factor.



# o
16

# • -**..--.~ ~--**  .... , ....... --...---c-' -....,..----,--, ---.--

__ •

_ ..----- -
- - -**~--** - - - . 

# •
Figure 

# 5 

# Recurrent Waste Generation, 1987-89 (in tons) 

# •

. 196,400

1987 215,582

1988 278,428

1989

### 2.6 RCRA vs. State-only 

### Recurrent Waste, 1987-89 As was discussed previously in Section 1.4, Dangerous 

### Waste Designation Process, Washington's Dangerous Waste Regulations significantly differ from RCRA in the range of materials regulated as dangerous waste. In addition to the Federal lists and characteristics, State rules include mixtures and criteria. Waste designation according to state regulation results in the addition of substantial quantities of state-only regulated waste. Figure 

### 6 illustrates the relationship between

. RCRA and state-only recurrent waste during the period 1987 through 1989. Growth in both waste categories is evident by comparing 1987's figures to those of 1989. A net gain of almost 48,000 tons of state-only waste is accompanied by an increase of more than 

### 35,000 tons ofRCRA regulated material. Less than ten percent of the RCRA growth occurred between 1987 and 1988. Nearly two-thirds ofthe state-only rise took place between 1988 and 1989. While the expansion of state-only waste closely follows the overall growth of the regulated community, RCRA waste follows closely behind. A vast majority of the regulated community holds its total generation fairly constant during this period. In 

### fact, a proportion of 

### the state's generators begin to report the significant benefits ofwaste reduction practices for the first time in 1989.Although heavily outweighing state-only waste when all waste types - recurrent, nonrecurrent, permit-by-rule, and radioactive mixed -- are included, RCRA waste comprises only slightly more than half of the recurrent waste 

### generated in this timeframe. Despite the increased number of sites reporting and Ecology's heightened emphasis upon education, recurrent waste remains almost equally split between RCRA and state-only.

.

18 

# o

o

o

# • •**~- ~_.--------------**  

# .....**_._~= -.._.....,,~~**  

# • Figure 6



# -RCRA vs. State-only Recurrent Waste, 1987-89

. Tons 200,000 ,..----------------"""'-----..

49% 51%

- - 

## - 

# - - - - 

# - - 

# - - 

### - - - - - 

### - 

# - - - 

### - 

# - - - 

## - 

# - - - - - 

### - - - - 

# - - 

### -**-~~.**



# 50,000

0

.....- 

# 150,000

-

100,000



# Year - 

# 1987

. 1988 1989 

# RCRA 102,151 105,161 137,230 

# State 94,249 110,421 141,196**§lUt-!:;ii:fe:f{~** 

# 196,_400 215,582

__ 278,426

### In beginning to answer the question of.who reports the generation of recurrent waste in Washington, attention is first directed to industry groups. This analysis aggregates three-digit SIC Codes and summarizes all business types into fifteen categories. Table C illustrates these categories, the amounts of waste reported in tons, and the percentage of total recurrent waste reported by industry group. 

### 2.7 Recurrent Waste Generated by 

### Industry Group, 

### 1989 

# o

For convenience, this classification can be further aggregated into groups of five each representing a third of the categories defined. Better than ninety percent of the recurrent waste generated in Washington during 1989 can be attributed to the first third of this classification. Primary and fabricated metal manufacturers, the chemical and petroleum industries, equipment manufacturers, transportation and utilities (which includes the dangerous waste management industry itself), and government installations reported the generation of more than 250,000 tons of recurrent waste.' The second third -- wholesale and retail trade, lumber and wood products, construction, business services, and rubber/plastics/leather/stone -- generates smaller quantities of recurrent waste. Over 23,000 tons are reported from these groups. However, this sum constitutes only eight percent of the state's recurrent waste total. Lastly, the third third has only minor shares of recurrent waste during 1989. Mining, agriculture, food and clothing, finance/insurance/real estate, and human services together contribute only 0.2 percent of this total. The clear dominance of the first third supports the commonly held picture of Washington's economic structure. Residents and non-residents alike would be fairly likely to include aluminum smelters, petroleum refineries, aircraft manufacturing, and specific Federal agencies such as Defense and Energy when solving their particular version of the state's economic puzzle. Site-specific analysis of recurrent waste generators continues in Section 2.8.

.

20

J 

# 0

..',



# o

# •• TABLE C RECURRENT WASTE GENERATED BY INDUSTRY GROUP, 1989'

INDUSTRY GROUP TONNAGE PERCENTAGE Agriculture.forestry.fishing (011-097) 16 <.0.01 Mining (101-149) 5 <.0.01 Construction (152-179) 4.020 1.44 Food and clothing (201-239) 54 0.02 Lumber. wood products.printing (241-279) 3.847 1.39

I
I

I f

# :.



# •**iiii~~~;i~j_i~~~~~!!tm~i·i:··ii::i:::!iiiii::j:i** Rubber.plastics.leather•stone (301-329)

............. - - '.......•...••.. ;. :
.

## :Rf.~.·~~·~r~.·m~m~ 

# ....**(~~:~t~i~>:::** 

# ..·:::·**~~miil~:liif*ii~g<i!2~I)iii::!:j.!·!i:i::!·!!!!!!**

# !:~_I,_~II!ill:III~~~~I!~I~!I~I·i:i:i!!!:::::::::::i!ji! Wholesale and retail trade (501-599) 

### Finance.insurance.real estate (601-679) Business services (701-799) Human services (801-899) Public administration (911-972) 

### TOTAL 2.147 

### 64 4.140



### 446 13,494 278.428 0.77 0.02 1.49 0.16 4.85 

## 100.00

### Having identified those industry groups playing major roles in Washington's recurrent waste generation picture, Table D provides a ranking of the top twenty-five recurrent waste generators. The top 25 LQG's reported more than 223,000 tons or eighty percent of all recurrent wastestreams. 'In contrast, the more than 2,300 remaining generators contributed just under twenty percent of all recurrent waste. 

### 2.8 Top 25 Recurrent Waste Generators 

# o

Familiar names dominate-this 

### exclusive group. Primary and fabricated metals are represented by Northwest Alloys, Reynolds, Kaiser, Alcoa, Seattle Steel, Columbia Aluminum, and Vanalco. Texaco, Shell, and Rhone Poulenc of the chemical and petroleum industry rank highly. The Boeing Company cracksthe top 25 with five sites in Seattle, Auburn, Everett and Tukwila

... Not surprisingly, the state's largest dangerous waste management facilities - Chemical Processors, Northwest Enviroservice, and Crosby & 

### Overton -- appears prominently. However, during 1989, the single largest recurrent waste generating site was the Department of Energy's Hanford Nuclear Reservation. Better than eleven percent ofthis waste type were reported by Hanford. These figures represent continued support for the transition of this facility from manufacturing to waste remediation laboratory. ' In addition, 32,990 tons of radioactive mixed waste were also reported by Hanford for 1989. These wastestreams included: 1) a corrosive slurry of water and trace heavy metals from double shell tanks (18,720 tons); 2) an ignitable, corrosive, toxic solution of acids, bases, and heavy metals from lab and plant operations (8,400 tons); 3) an ignitable, corrosive toxic solution of bases and heavy metals from plant operations (2,066 tons); and

. 4) a corrosive nitric acid solution neutralized with potassium hydroxide from concentrator operations (1,665 tons).

r



### 22 

# o

-0

# •

i. ! 

# I I I L 

# t**~.**



# • TABLED TOP 25 

### RECURRENT WASTE GENERATORS, 1989

GENERATOR TONS PERCENT 

### Department ofEnergy - Hanford 31,955 11.5 Northwest Alloys - Addy 25,947 9.3 Reynolds Metals - Longview 22,596 8.1 Kaiser Aluminum - Mead 14,156 5.1 Wenatchee Works ofAlcoa - Wenatchee 12,313 ,4.4 Chemical Processors - Seattle 11,274 4.0 Chemical Processors - Tacoma 10,428 3.7 Boeing Plant 2 - Seattle 9,057 3.3 . Lehigh Portland Cement - Metaline Falls 7,800 2.8 Boeing Thompson Site - Tukwila 7,309 2.6 Northwest Enviroservice

- Seattle 7,003 2.5 Seattle Steel - Seattle 6,490 2.3 Kaiser Aluminum - Tacoma 6,091 2.2 Rhone-Poulenc - Seattle 6,054 2.2 Texaco Refining - Anacortes 5,637 2.0 Boeing - Auburn 5,016 1.8 Columbia Aluminum - Dallesport 5,005 1.8 Vanalco - Vancouver 4,243 1.5 Boeing North Boeing Field - Seattle 4,201 1.5 Berkley Structures - Seattle 3,800 1.4 Puget Sound Naval Shipyard

- Bremerton 3,625 1.3 Shell Oil - Anacortes 3,612 1.3 Boeing - Everett 3,377 1.2 Crosby & 

### OvertonlChempro - Kent 3,320 1.2 Salmon Bay Steel - Seattle 3,174 1.1 

### TOP 25 TOTAL 223,483 80.1 ALL OTHER GENERATORS 

### 54,943 19.9

### 2.9 Recurrent Waste Generation by 

### County, 1989

. Figure 7 clearly displays the distribution of where recurrent waste was generated in 1989. The strength ofthe relationship between population and waste generation is substantiated by the significant figures found for King, Pierce, Spokane, Clark, Snohomish, and Kitsap Counties. However, the prominence ofmore rural areas such as Benton, Stevens, Cowlitz. Chelan, Skagit. and Pend Oreille indicates that other factors are also at play. Looking back to Table D. "Top 25 Recurrent Waste Generators", on page 21 will begin to explain this apparent discrepancy. Eight members of this select group are located,

### in the more rural areas ofthe state.' The presence of even one ofthese sites is sufficient to rapidly propel a county to . ."the top ofthe heap": 

# o

COUNTY Benton Stevens Cowlitz Chelan . Skagit Pend Oreille 

### SITE NAME Department ofEnergy Hanford Reservation Northwest Alloys Reynolds Metals Alcoa Texaco, Shell Lehigh Portland Cement This point is made particularly clear when viewed 

### in context ofthe recurrent generation for each county found in Appendix A-I. However, Washington's urban areas are the home to a number oflarge generators as well as large numbers of generators. At the top 

### in terms of population as well as Iarge generators. King County is represented by eleven sites among the top 25.

24 

# o

o I I,

# • • •

County Tonnage**l~lKW~:~M** 

# lIB 101-1,000 1,001-10,000 

# Figure 7 

# Recurrent Waste Generation by County, 1989·



# - >10,000
King Benton Stevens Pierce Cowlitz Spokane

Chelan Skagit Pend Oreille Clark Snohomish Kitsap Klickitat Whatcom Franklin All others I •••;;:;:-;:::-..;.-;.::;.;:;::........:.::;:;:;:;:-;.::;;;:;::'?-::-;.::;:.:::.::.:'?-:::::.::::.:::-;.::::-;.:::;.;:

....**:::::::::-;..::~:::::::x:::;·;:;:::::::;:»-.:;:*:;:-;.;:;.::;:;:;:-;.::::-;.;:;:;.::-;::;:-;.:·:::::::·-;.-;.-;.::-;.:::::::;x:-;.:::::·:;::::-;.::-;.·:::::->~::** ...:••;:;::-..;.-;.:'::.;::.::-;.

.. »:':...:.......;:-;.:::".$-;.;:•• ;::::....:;.;.;":!;:::;:;:;:;::.:.::-;.:.;.;:;::::

....-;.;:::.:::;:;:;:;:.;:-;.::;:..:.:;::':.:::.;..;.".;::.;.;::

.... :. :... :«:;

..«;::;:-;'-;'; 91,581 I

·**:::::::::::.::::~:~:~.~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::~::~::::~:::::~::::::;::::::**...::::::::::::::x:::; ...:::::::::::..**:::::~:::~~~::::::::~:~:<::::1I32,OM** I I I I

••••:-::;.;.:
...:•• ::.:
...**:::.:.:-;.::.::-;:~:::::::-;.:::.-;.:~:::-;..:: ;::::::-::** **:: :-:-** **:: ::** **::,: :::::** **:::** .. ·;»··: 25,9511 I I I I

•**.:::~::~-:~::::-:~:::::=>.::::::::::::.::::::::::.:.:::::::::.:;:;:'$::'::::::::::=::::':'::::::::X::;:::::-:::::** 24,404 I I I I 23,709 I I I I •• :::::::::';':::::::;''i-:::::::::::::::::::.::::;'::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;.:::::::::::

....:::'$.::::::::: I I I I ':.:::::::::::::::::::::::::;,::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::

.... :-;.: 1'{>'J5 I I I I

·..**';::::;;:,~:~~::::~:::~:::~:::~~~::~~::::~** 12,362 I I I I I ".:;::::::::::0$:"-::::::::::;:::::::::::::::::;:::::: 11,370 I I I I I 7,817 I I I I I

·

### . ,::;;::..**:~~:::::~:::~.~:** I I I I I :.....

«-:;:::y-,:...:::: 7,454 I I I I I

•;;'-:::::::::":=::::::;: 6,034 I 

# . I I I I .:::::-;.:::::::::::::::: 5,643 I I I I I

.- 5,030 I I I I I ::::::::::::"::::::: 

# ::1 2•

719 I I I I I I I I I I :'1,231 I I I I I :.3,378 I I I I I I ·0 20,000 40,000 60,000 

### Tons 80,000 100,000 120,000

### 2.10 Recurrent Waste Recycled On-site by County, 1989 In 

### order to support public and private efforts toward waste minimization and source reduction, Ecology began in 1989 to collect data measuring on-site recycling of dangerous waste. The mechanism is quite simple; generators were introduced to a value R in the Form 4's "Status" field (Column 15C). Those wastes meeting the regulatory definition of recycling (WAC 173-303-016,017) taking place at the site of generation could now be identified. Independent of government assistance,' individuals and organizations had assessed the costs and benefits ofon-site recycling. Financial advantages are obvious: 1) after the initial purchase ofequip-ment, .capital outlays for new inputs to the production process decrease; 2) significant savings result from lower expenditures' for transportation and waste management contractors; and 3) liabilities associated with cradle-to-grave waste management are greatly reduced. Of at least equal consideration, however, are the contributions to personal and societal quality of life. Personal responsibility rises as control of waste management shifts to the 'generating sites. The' number of waste shipments on the highways -- and the risk associated with such transportation -- declines. Quantities of waste requiring off-site management exhibit the potential for up 

## to ninety percent reduction by weight. As Figure 8 illustrates, the number of on-site recyclers comprise less than five percent of all sites reporting in 1989 (164 out of 3,798). The amount of waste recycled in this manner equals less than one percent ofWashington's 1989 recurrent waste total. However, it is the start of a trend that will be subject to private and public support and demand. Washington's first depiction of where on-site recycling takes place is also shown in Figure 8. Innovators choosing this option for waste management are again most strongly associated with the more densely settled portions of-the state. The sixty-seven sites reporting from King County total nearly 750 tons of recycled waste or 36.6 percent of the Statetotal. While significant, this figure is only 0.8 percent of the county's reported recurrent waste total. Other counties demonstrated higher levels of on-site recycling occurring in 1989 as is shown in Table E. Kitsap County had two sites recycling 272 tons or almost five percent of the County's recurrent waste. Grays Harbor County's generators recycled more than seven percent of their recurrent waste. Finally, Thurston County led the state by reporting 138 tons or thirty percent of recurrent waste as having been recycled on-site in 1989. Few conclusions regarding on-site recycling can be reached through the collection ofa single year's data. .Obviously, great opportunities for further diffusion ofthis innovation exist. The development of new market niches will attract entrepreneurs, technology, and productdevelopment, Government can and must provide incentives to encourage this option. Continuing educational efforts by regulators and business associations will hopefully result in tangible changes to be supported by

.future collection of this information.


### 26 

# c



# o

o

# • • •

County



# : 1•. 

## :<1 >0

### I~WNf¥J >50

I I 

# 11II >100 

# - >500



# : 

# Figure 8 

# Recurrent Waste Recycled On-site by County, 1989

749

I I 

## o 200 400 

# Tons 600 800 

### 1,000

# • TABLE E 

### RECURRENT WASTE RECYCLED ON-sITE BY COUNTY IN 1989

PERCENTAGE % 

### OF COUNTY SITES TONNAGE OF STATE RECURRENT COUNTY REPORTING REPORTED TONNAGE WASTE Benton 

### 7 28.98 1.4 <0.1 Chelan 

### 3 26.48 1.3 0.2 Clark 

### 6 101.06 4.9 1.3 Cowlitz 

### 2 71.73 3.5 0.3 Grays Harbor 

### 2 15.03 0.7 .7.2 King 

### 67 749.33

. 36.6 0.8 Kitsap 

### 2 272.28 13.3 4.8 Kittitas 

### 1 0.88 <0.1 22.0 Lewis 

### 1 72.95 3.6 15.1 Pacific 

### 1 0.25 <0.1 5.0 Pierce 

### 24 108.31 5.3 0.4 Skagit 

### 3 6552 3.2 0.6 Snohomish 

### 18 82.22 4.0 1.4 Spokane 

### 12 229.52 11.2 1.3 Thurston 

### 7 138.01 6.7 30.4 Walla Walla 

### 1 1.9 <0.1 0.5 Whateom 

### 4 64.14 3.1 2.3 Yakima 

### 3 20.10 1.0 3.8 WASHINGTON 

## 164 2,048.69 

### 100.0 : 

### 0.7**---~--.~--**



### ·2.UP'ennit-by-ruie Waste Generaticm by ,County, 1989
Since 1987, Washington dangerous waste generators have reported sizeable quantities of wastewater designating as dangerous waste underpermit-by-rule. (These data are shown in Section 

### 2.4 and Figure 

### 4, pages 

### 12-13..) As the 

### understandingofpermit-by-rule regulations increases, additional generators 

### can expect to 

### be identified. Ecology's 

### educationaloutreachand guidance, as well as increased emphasis'asa component ofcompliance inspections, willcontribute to the continued ' growth ofthis waste type. Initial efforts in this direction are largely responsible for the :growth exhibited in Figure 

### 4. Figure 9 displays 

### the state's distribution 

### ofpermit-by-rule wastes.' Skagit County alone reporred more than fifty-seven ,percent of

### these wastewaters. King 

### and Pierce account for another 

### lA million tons or nearly 

### thirty percent. The remaining twelve percent are 

### divided ,primarily between Clark, Spokane, Grant, Benton, Snohomish, Kitsap, 

### and Stevens Counties. Those 

### Industriesreperting permit-by-rule waste are shown in Table F.The ,chemical and petroleum industry generated more 'than seventypeFcentof all.

### reported wastewaterIn 1989. 

### Equipmentmanufacturingresulted in more than one million tons or twenty-three percent of

### the state's total. Six of

### the .remaining seven percent were contributed by the primary and fabricated metals industry. 'Less than one percent ·of all permit-by-rule waste was generated by all other industry groups. 

# o

The narrow 

### spectrumof industrial activity is mirrored by the extreme. concentration 

### ofpermit- 'by-role waste 

### to :v.ery few 

### sitesacross Washington. As can 

### be seen in Table 

### G,. the topfifieen 

# 0 generators are responsible for greater than ,ninety-eight percent of allPBR w.astes. Those counties figuring 'prominently in Figure9's mapping rise to the top ofTable 

### G as well: Skagit King PierCe Clark Spokane Benton Snohomish Kitsap .shell Oil Boeing-Auburn, Industrial Plating; Asko Processing, Hytek Finishes, Davis Walker, Protective Coatings Occidental Chemical SEH America, Union Carbide Keytronic USDOE-Hanford Boeing-Everett

. Puget Sound Naval Shipyard. 

## An other reporters contributed less than two percent of the state's permit-by-rule generation.



# o .30

# • • •**ItlrmJ~~1** >10,000 

# fJ!D >100,000 

# - >500,000 

# Figure 9 

# Permit-by-rule Waste Generation

by County, 1989**4t~i~lt:*****~:::~** 

### - 

# - - 

# - - - - - - 

### - - 

### - - - - - - 

### - - 

# - - 

# - - 

# - - - - 

### - - - 

### - 

# - - - - 

### - - 

# - - - 

# - - - - - 

# - - 

# - - - - 

# - - 

# - - 

# -**:;::~ ~illffi** 



# - - 

### - 

### - - 

### - - - 

# - - 

### - - - - - - 

### - - 

# - - - 

# - - - - - - - - 

### - - - 

### - - 

### - - - 

### - - - 

### - 

# - - - 

# - - '-



## - - - - 

### - 

# - - 

### - -



# - - 

# - - - - 

# - - - 

# - - - - 

# - - - - - 

# - - - 

# - 

# - - - - 

# - - - - 

# - 

# - - - - - - 

# - - 

# - - 

## - 

# - - - 

# - - - - - - 

# - - 

# - - -



# -

# II - - 

# - - - - 

# - - - 

# - - - 

# - - 

# - - - - - 

# - - - 

# - - - 

# - - - 

# - - 

# - - - 

# - - 

# - ,. 

# - 

# - - - 

# - - 

# - - - - 

# - - 

# -

- 

# i1

- - - 

# - - - - 

# - - 

# - - - - - - - - 

# - - - 

# - - - - - 

# - - 

# - - 

# - - 

# - - - 

# - - 

# - - - 

# - - 

# - - - -

# ,~;~::::::i;~~i~i:1J 

# .**E~;:~:~~;:;:;;:~:::~ :I:::~~::::::::::::l9'** **4t:::::::::~t?:p A::::::~~:~:~::r:::w** **A::N~t:::::~:::::r** 

### ./::::littJ7 A:i:::::::::::I:::Y

.. .'
. .. .. ... 

### Tons 3,000,000

2,500,000

2,000,000

1,500,000

1,000,000

500,000

o Skagit King Clark Spokane Grant 

### County Benton Snohomish K1tsap Stevens All otbers**,----~----**



### TABLE F 

### WASTEWATER GENERATED UNDER PERMIT-BY-RULE BY INDUSTRY GROUP, 1988-1989

585 0.03 506,195 23.71 157,070 7.35 1,373,821 64.36 793 0.03

0 0.00 96,101

. 4.50 2,134,566 100.00 TONS PERCENT CHANGE CHANGE 18 3.1 2,683,576 530.2

128,742. 82.0 -329,448 -24.0 666 84.0 INDUSTRY GROUP
Lumber, wood products, printing (241-279)

Wholesale and retail trade (501-599) Human services (801-899) Public administration (911-972) TOTAL



# o TONS '89

603

1,459 1 14,847 4,536,866 PERCENT '89

0.01

0.03 0.00 0.33 100.00



# o TONS '88 PERCENT '88

-81,254 2,402.,300 -84.6 112.5



# o

# • •

TABLEG TOP 15 PERMIT-BY-RULE WASTE GENERATORS, 1989 

# •

COMPANY WASTE STREAM TONNAGE PERCENTAGE 

### Shell Oil :.. Anacortes Kerosene, 1-1-1 

### trichloroethane 2,600,000 57.31 

### Boeing

- Auburn Cadmium, lead 615,450 13.57 

### Occidental Chemical

- Tacoma Sulfuric acid 504,102 11.11 

### SEHAmerica

- Vancouver Hydrofluoric acid 169,470 3.74 

### Keytronic

- Spokane Sulfuric acid, copper, nickel 143,792 3.17 

### Union Carbide

- Washougal Hydrofluoric acid 105,988 2.34 

### USDOE -.Hanford 

### , Sulfuric acid 71,810 1.58 

### Boeing

- Everett Cadmium, chromium, methylene chloride, 59,140 1.30 

### xylene, methyl ethylketone, acetone, toluene Industrial Plating - Seattle Cadmium, chromium, lead 50,500 1.11 

### AskoProcessing

- Seattle Cadmium, chromium, copper, lead 39,821 0.88 

### HytekFinishes - Kent Cadmium, chromium 37,980 0.84 

### DavisWalker .- Kent Chromium, sulfuric acid, hydrochloric .acid 20,415 0.45 

### Boeing - Auburn Oil, coolants 16,750 0.37 

### Protective Coatings

- Seattle Cadmium, chromium . 14,215 0.31 

### PugetSound Naval Shipyard

- Cadmium, chromium, lead, barium 12,425 0.27 

### Bremerton TOP 15 GENERATORS 4,461,858 98.35 ALL OTIIERS 75,008 1.65

### CHAPTER 3. DANGEROUS WASTE MANAGEMENT Having discussed the generation side of the cradle-to-grave equation in some detail, Chapter 3 of the Summary examines the "how" and "where" of Washington's dangerous waste management. Data drawn from Ecology's Form 5, "Waste Management Facility Annual Dangerous Waste Report", is used to assess management methods at in-state facilities. Information from "Generator Annual Dangerous Waste Reports" provides a basic picture of waste exports. Analyses of both data sets are combined to discuss net flows of dangerous waste in 1989. 

### 3.1 1989 Washington Management Facility Demographics Treatment/storage/disposal facilities (fSDF's) are required by Federal and State law to operate under a permit issued by an authorized agency. In Washington, facility permitting is conducted by both USEPA Region 10 and Ecology's Solid and Hazardous Waste Program. The permit·consists of an initial application; known

# as the Part A, and a much more extensive and detailed successor, the Part B. 

### A TSDF is consideredto be permitted once its Parts A and B have received approval from both issuing agencies. The lengthy preparation and review process for permit approval or denial requires a regulatory transition stage known as interim status. TSDF's in existence on November 19, 1980 may operate under interim status until a final permit decision is made. New' entrants into the industry must have both their Parts A and B approved prior to operation. Data used in Chapter 3 is derived primarily from Ecology's Form 5, "Waste Management Facility Annual Dangerous Waste Report". Form 5's are received from permitted or interim status TSDF's, immediate recyclers, and permit-by-rule facilities. (Information relating to permit-by-rule generation is.found in Section 2.11.) Permit-by-rule facilities submit Form 5 solely to report the management methods for their PBR waste. Therefore, the set ofwaste management facilities operating in Washington in 1989 divides into two distinguishable groups: 1) TSDF's; and 2) immediate, or 24-hour, recyclers. Further distinctions can be made between ·commercial TSDF's and captive facilities. A facility is determined to be captive if the waste managed is either generated on-site or received from a select group of generators usually having the same ownership

..Examples ofcaptive facilities identified in Washington include: the Boeing Company's Auburn, Everett, and Renton locations and the Federal Government's Defense Reutilization and Mobilization Organization's (DRMO) Fort Lewis site. In contrast, immediate recycler refers to those commercial firms accepting off-site waste and incorporating these wastes into the recycling process within 24 hours. As the local market for recycling has grown, so have the regulatory requirements for facilities meeting this definition. However, in 1989 only.the first steps in the transition of applicable requirements - from generator to TSDF -- were in motion.

. Table H provides a listing ofWashington's commercial TSDF's and primary immediate recycler. Clearly, the geographic distribution bears a strong correlation to that of the generator population. The absence of management options for generators in eastern Washington has been identified as an impediment to pricing and services provided. On the other hand, most firms west of the Cascade Mountains were able to choose from a range ofmanagement methods and service providers:

.34 

# o

o

o

# •

• TABLEH WASlDNGTON COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT FACILrrIEs, i989

COUNTY CITY FACILITY NAME METHOD Clark Washougal Chemical Processors T,S Franklin Pasco Safety-Kleen S King Auburn Safety-Kleen S Kent Chemical Processors T,S Seattle Chemical Processors

- Pier 91 S Seattle Chemical Processors

- Georgetown T,S Seattle Northwest Enviroservice T,S Pierce Tacoma Lilyblad Petroleum S Tacoma Northwest Processing S Tacoma Sol-Pro R Snohomish Lynnwood Safety-Kleen S Spokane Spokane Safety-Kleen S Spokane Washington Chemical T,S Yakima Yakima Cameron-Yakima T,S
Note: For the purposes ofTable H, "Methods" are symbolized by the following codes: S = storage; T=treatment, and R=immediate recycler

.

35

### 3.2 Waste Management Methods at Washington Facilities, 1989 

# o Figure 

### 10 provides a snapshot ofthe overall picture of waste management methods at Washington TSDF's during 

### 1989. At a glance, recurrent waste managed in-state appears to have been almost equally divided between storage, treatment, and disposal. The disposal figures are particularly notable. Ninetynine percent ofthe disposal activity was reported by captive facilities. This conforms with the prevailing status ofWashington having no commercial disposal facilities. These facilities disposed dangerous waste via land treatment or surface impoundments destined to be closed as landfills.
In contrast, radioactive mixed waste was primarily stored with very little actual disposal occurring. (All radioactive mixed waste reported in 

### 1989 was generated and managed by the Department ofEnergy at the Hanford Reservation.) Finally, in the case ofipermit-by-rule wastewater, nearly all waste was treated with little, if any, storage and/or disposal reported. Actual values ofthe data depicted in Figure 10 are found in Table 

### I. Further discussion of Washington waste management activities distinguish between on-site and off-site (but still in-state) facilities. This discussion is found in Section 

### 3.3.

TABLE I WASTE MANAGEMENT METIlODS AT WASlDNGTON**FAC~ITIES,** 

### 1989 TONNAGES

Recurrent Radioactive mixed Permit-by-rule Total Disposal 

### 46,050 0 71,631 117,681 Storage 

### 69,320 233,427 125 302,872 Treatment 

### 43,533 133,660 4,523,395 4,700,588 TOTAL 

### i58,903 367,087 4,595,151 5,121,151

36 

# '0



# o

# •

Tons ._-... "'--'-

... ---, --, - -,,--- - ....--- •**.---~ ..----...-.-----~** **............-~ ---...--~** **~-y ...--.---...-~----**  .. 

# • Figure 10 

# Waste Management Methods at Washington Facilities, 1989

_ 

# •

5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 , . 

### , 

### ,

,



### , 

# • Radioactive P-B-R**:~~r}** 

# Total .:.:-:.:-:.



# . Disposal Storage Treatment 

# Management Method

### 3.3 On-site Management of Dangerous Waste, 1989 Data gathered from 1989 Facility Annual Reports relating to on-site management of dangerous' waste is illustrated in Figure .11. Slightly more than ninety-eight percent, or 4,595,151 tons, ofall waste managed on-site consisted of permit-by-rule wastewaters. Only 92,069 tons of recurrent waste were managed on-site during 1989. 

# o

, The situation presented by those facilities storing waste on-site in 1989 is very similar. Three aluminum smelters -- Kaiser (Mead and Tacoma) and Alcoa (Wenatchee) -- reported more than ninety-nine percent of the waste stored on-site as landfilled potliner.

.The vast majority of this material was later exported to Oregon for disposal. Kaiser Aluminum in Mead was responsible for more than fifty-five percent of this total.

## :j!i;1.;:.~!:.~~.i;:.~·.;·,:.i.;ii.:~.~.!.;:.~i!·.~.~i**! ;** 

## .**······,··<\······Pi-!P§~~~~ep:.*#g··.g~ij**

;.:.DD·.:

.••

## ·.ss

••••.

e.:.·

•. 00

••.• ..•. ··:•.••.•. ·,

••.••..•.•:

..

## u T ...•. :•. ·.·:.·:· .•. • .•. 

### n. an .••:,:,·, .•.•. d,.: .•. ·: •... · •... ••.. ·· .•. 

## e d •...:,.· .•..•·.·•. r.f·· .• : ...• ,· •• .•..

# ·.~ ••••••..•. • .. ,·: ••.•.' .•.•• .••.•••..· .•. O ••.•,l .•.•.·.•.· .•.

# ~: •.•.•. ·.: .• ::.·•..•...•. ,· .•.•.. , •.••.·., ••. d.·.· .•: ..•.• ••.

# ~.,·.:

••.•. ·.• .•: •.••·.n:· .•... ·•. ··, •. •.•.· .. ::.J ..•..•

# ~.·

.•..•.••.• .•..• 

## ,c .•.•.·, •• •.•.•.t •.•.•.•. , •• , .•••.•1 .••.

# ·.·.;.lii

# l!lj1ll

"- ·· .•.

# ·,·.··.·~···an· .. ···d··:,
.. ··.:··,
.... t·.·.·r

....·e

.. ··.a

. ·t·m·'e'n
.. ·t····.'.····:·.··:··· .••.•.••..•..•• , •..• , •..' .••....••.•.•:

..: .••..•...•••. :::,,::••,:.::,
.. ,:::. ·····D82L .../: •••.•••••••••••••.

# ·;l'lif~llllllll_I_II;\;,;ir~ 

# illl

'.:::(\::)

## :?~**/~;~:::::** ,"'-.-:
....::-;.:": .;

## ;;i;;;.~**::~;;::; ./~~;**  ::(:.::....
. •.•.

## ~: .•.·.;.;

.••·::1.\:·

.••• .••.

## ::.·.::.~.\.·.•.•.• ::: .•.•.

## :~.:.:.;~.:.~.:..

## ~.~•••

## ::~,.:.~ .•.•..•...•..

## ;.~...

## ~.,·.::.~::.·.••. :.:l ..•..••..•..•:......... ••••.••

·••• .': '::::.,

## ~.'...

## ::.~ ::<:.:::.:"':'-".::.::: : ..:....**··::}::::::~«~~:;~~:>\;()(:~t~/\~~\:<r** 

### ;\:: 

### ·i)y

# .~~~~g;~.'j@;i~$~gq~~: 

# ):\

•.•..•. :·.·,·".· ••.·: •.• ·.,.•• : •. ·: •.

# ~S~~O.~.~2·.~U~.~ .•

# ll.ilii~~!llillr ..•. ): .•..•, .• .•:
.... :·: •.

# Ui'

. .

### ........• 

# :

# ~1It!!**lililitfi.i'!III(~(1~111** ::::-.:-; ::.::.;:::: "::;:-:;:::;::;::::;
. ..- , '.......•.. , :.: .;.:.:.;. ..:-
..:..

.**::':.~:** .•. : •.•.• :.:
...**~.,:.:~:** ..**~.:** •.':

.. :.:.: ..•.**,::,.:.~.,** .•• .•' .••::.:.; .•• ,: .• :.......... .:::.:>:,., :::-:: :\ •.**).~~.j;.;.{**..**~:**....**:\.~:.::.~.'.::.:**.... )

.. ::,}

..:.:.: •.
..**r::.j.~.~**..

:.·:.::,::.:·:·,'.:.·

.**~.~~**..**~,·**•. ::: •.**r.:~**..**~~:.::.:·.{.r()r(~{:~ <)t)i:~~{~**  r\\\( ::::;:::::::::;:::::::::;: '.'.",' .", .,:.•., •.:., •.••:: •••.. ::.:.,•• ::, •.**:~:** •.• : .. : ..•• , •• : ..••.. , . :: . :' :::'. ".cc- :.:**:{}}~:\~\.::.,; .~**  ..;::.:\\/ .", - - ' , ,-... ....• ..,:

.•. ::'.: ..• ; ::

..**:~** :, .•..... :.:
. :

### , '::: •... :' . 

### :

..•.....• ':., .• :.,:::::: ':.:;:::;".:;:::;:::'::::::::::;:;:::::;::::;;).:;::::::::;::;:{:}:;::f}:::::: ;.; . 

### ":::::/;";'-.::::: ::::.:::-,:,'.:::':**ji~)(j.m\}) <»<..............'!'E~~~#~.~~!** 
: : .••:
... ::., ....••... .•

## ~,.~.::.: .•'.: •.:.: •.•. .. ,:.:::
..

## :~.~ •.: .•.

## ~., . ;
...: .•.

## ~., •.

## ~.:.:.: ..' .•..•.. ' .• .

## ,~..

## '~ •.. •... ••.•. : ••.:.,
..

## '.~::•. : .•.....•: .•.... :
.

## ~.:..••.

## ~.:; ...•. ,...... ... ... ... .. ..,.... ... .... .

## :>}f}}~ {:?)}}}

[

..

### ~.:~.j~..

### ~.~;::..

### '.~::\..

### ~.:**:.~:,::.\.:::**..•.

### ~;.~.**:;}:~;;~:{;:\:::;~;:~::;:::~:::~:~::::':::'::::."'. ~:\\1~\)~;:.:~:.~1;;~~:.:\:.:;:.~;-.~\~.\;":jlr.~r.~.j.~.~.:;.~.~.::.~**  ..

### ~:.~~.~~..

### ~:.; 

## ::·.::<:?(Tnermal\··'··::···'·:·'>:>':":"·: ':(\ ...>... eli" ······1········; 

### ·.·.·i}···. 

# .••.: •.. .. ....••...••....•..., .•.•.•...: •.•........, ..........•...•.., .•..: •.. •.....•...•.: •..••.....•.. ,, •....: .....•.....•...•.......•..:

.••' .•.•.......•.....••..•..•.•.•..:

..•........•.....: ....••.•: .•..••............•••....:

..•...: .•... :: •.•.. •..... ::**···~h·)·tt:l~~g~::·t?;···················:·······** 

# ;:**!r.i~)~~1~¥srlt~\lIG2·.** 

# , ••.••.••.••: •.• :!.•.••..•

, • , • : •.: •• : ••.•.' .•.•. ' .• : ••.••.••.• :.

### ·)·X\.:·:$~P*(:)gi.¢t:lj.r<.']:·**~:::~::)~{{r~{}r\\~:::~\/~:~;~{:::::** 

### ..;::::;::::;:::::::::;: :;:::;:::::: ;::::;;}::::<.;::::.:

. Handling codes 

### In this analysis, a hierarchical system has been used within the following guidelines. Categories of management -- disposal, storage, and treatment -- have been identified using waste handling codes reported on the facilities' Form 5's. Any provision of a disposal code -- separately or in combination with other handling codes -- led to the conclusion that the waste had been disposed on-site. Likewise, the inclusion of any storage code -- in the absence of disposal codes -- assumed

. storage of the waste reported. Waste aggregated under the treatmentclassification had any and all handling codes provided indicating treatment methods. On-site disposal reported in 1989 was primarily limited to a small group of petroleum refmeries and primary metal producers. Texaco, Shell, British Petroleum (BP), and Arco were responsible for land farming 11,586 tons of DAF float and API separator sludges. ReynoldsMetals (Longview) disposed of 21,672 tons of black mud resulting from cryolite processing in a surface impoundment to be closed as a landfill. Northwest Alloys (Addy) landfilled 12,538 tons of baghouse dust and condenser residues.

38 

# o

o

# • -' 

### -**-.._-..~-----.....** .... 

### -**------~ -----~**  ------**~'" -~.**  -**.....---~ -.....---~**  ..------.-**".----.--.-:~~~~. ~-------..-----**  . -,,--- 

# • •

4,687,220 tons managed

, \ 

### ,

, 

### \ 92,069 tons , \ \ 2%

\

\ \ 

# Figure 11 

# On-site Management ofDangerous Waste, 1989

I 

### Treatment
I 

### 878 tons



# -
.. Storage 45,217 tons

Disposal 45,974 tons

### 3.4 Washington Dangerous Waste Imports, '1989 The distribution of states generating dangerous waste imported to Washington facilities for management is found in Figure 13. Eighteen states and Canada were identified as sources of the 18,783 tons of imported waste to Washington facilities. (Specific figures for waste received from out-of-state generators is found in Appendix A-2.) While most waste received had its origins west of the Mississippi River, several distinctions between sources may be noted. Oregon was the only state exceeding the 10,000 ton threshold for imported waste in 1989. In fact, more than fifty-five percent of all imports were received from Oregon generators. Proximity to Washington facilities and subsequent connection to the national waste management industry explains the strength of this relationship and the significant "trade" with: California. Idaho. and Montana. As the location of the primary ports of entry for goods from the North Pacific, Washington is the historic destination for waste generated in Alaska as well. Much of this material was also subject to Federal contracts requiring waste management solely by specific firms. Most of the remaining waste imports are also largely explained as an attempt to minimize transportation costs associated with waste management. 

# o

However, some connections to Washington's wastemanagement industry appear to defy geographic proximity. Nearly one thousand tons of dangerous waste were imported from Pennsylvania during 1989. In this particular case, a very specific waste stream -- radioactive lead -- was imported by only one receiving facility -- Energy's Hanford facility -- without concern for additional transportation costs. All in all, very few examples of cross-country attraction are found in explaining the sources of imported waste management during 1989. ' Over the period 1987 through 1989, Washington's dangerous ,waste imports have nearly doubled. 

# 0
Facilities reported receiving 9,705 tons of out-of-state waste for treatment and storage in 1987. By 1988, this figure had increased by 3,413 tons to 13,122 and by 1989 the addition of another 5,661 tons had raised the total received to 18,783 tons. Among the reasons for this rise are: 1) clarification of the permit status of Cameron-Yakima and its thermal treatment of activated carbon filters; and 2) the increased quantity of waste generated by out-of-state Federal facilities received for treatment and storage by Northwest Enviroservice.

Figure 12. Washington Dangerous Waste Imports, 1987-1989 r Import tons . . ............... .

. . . . . .. ... 

# >/1 o

40

# • - - -.,.--- . --..--- - 

# ----

. ...,.---. ,,----. ..

_ ..--- ....-- ..- ....--- .. - ....- . .. - . - - . 

# •

.Figure 13 

# Washington Dangerous Waste Imports, 1989

TONS 

# •

### Dangerous waste exported by Washington generators in 1989 is the subject of Figure 15. In this case, twenty-three states and Canada were recipients of Washington generated dangerous waste. While

.the pattern found on this map bears similarities to that distribution found in Figure 12, the amounts of waste exported exceeded imports by more than a factor of six -- 114,525 to 18,783 tons. While acknowledging this difference, it must be noted that Washington regulates materials not considered to be waste in many other states. For that reason, the comparison between imports and exports must be qualified. 

### 3.5 Washington Dangerous Waste Exports, 1989 

# o

Figure 14. Washington Dangerous Waste BxPorts. 1987-1989.·

1 35 325 1 9 B7- 1 34 054

# 8000timl 1 14 5 25



# -**:~:~;:::** 

# I

Expo, t 

# I
t ons

" 

### As was the case with imports, the largest proportions of exported waste went to nearby destinations or distant facilities providing' specific services. Once again, Oregon leads those states receiving waste in 1989. Nearly seventy percent of all waste exported from Washington was managed by 

### Oregon facilities. As shown by the data found in Appendix A-2, no other state received more than 7,000 tons of Washington waste. The vast majority ofthese wastes were disposed at Chern-Security 

### Systems' Arlington facility. Illinois, California, Idaho, Kansas, Pennsylvania, Nebraska, and Texas comprise the second tier of states receiving Washington waste. Illinois and California both have well developed management industries capable of servicing many needs of the regulated community. Idaho, Kansas, Pennsylvania, Nebraska, and Texas are the home of individual -- or 

### a limited set of -- facilities linked to Washington's generators in 1989. Idaho possesses Envirosafe Services' Grandview RCRA landfill. Kansas, Nebraska, and Missouri are the home of cement kilns burning alternative fuels containing spent solvents. Texas and Pennsylvania offered more specific options for particular waste streams - incineration and recycling, respectively. Several other states received lesser proportions of Washington's generators' business. Waste brokers balancing costs and services directed significant amounts of regulated material to Utah, 

### Arizona, Missouri, Arkansas, and Louisiana. In addition, opportunities afforded by nearby Canadian facilities have continued to make further inroads within Washington's waste management alternatives. Between 1987 and 1989, Washington's dangerous waste exports have gradually decreased. From a high of 135,325 tons in 1987, slight dropping to 134,054 in 1988, to 1989's. reporting of 114,525 tons. The early adoption of on-site recycling technologies as well as more competitive position of Washington management facilities may begin to explain this decline. This reduction in exports has been most strongly felt in neighboring states such as Oregon and Idaho.

42 

# o

o

# •

'

# •

Figure 15 

# Washington Dangerous Waste Exports, 1989, 

# •

{) TONS

### 3.6 Net Flows of Dangerous Waste, 1989 Figure 16, "Net Flow ofDangerous Waste, 1989", illustrates the exchange of dangerous waste for management between Washington and its fellow states. For the first time, differences between imports and exports have been analyzed and presented. .Two obvious groupings result from this comparison: 1) those states sending more waste to Washington than they are receiving as exports or net exporters; and 2) net importers receiving more Washington waste than that sentto Washington facilities for management. Those areas identified as net exporters include Alaska, Hawaii, Montana, North Dakota, and Canada. Most, if not all, ofthese origins have little, if any, waste management capacity developed. The exception to this generalization is Canada and more specifically the province ofBritish Columbia. Net movement of waste southward into Washington in this case results from strong economic links between Washington facilities and Canadian brokers and/or transporters. On the other hand, net importers ofWashington waste are spread across the United States. In order of amounts received, Oregon stood above all other destinations for Washington waste. Due to the availability of commercial landfill capacity, more than 72,000 tons of net waste flows entered Oregon in 1989. The next largest movement of waste was 6,500 tons received by Illinois. Clearly, Oregon has little competition in dominating the network of regulated waste flows with regard to 

### Washington's waste. 

# o

Most states having disposal or recycling facilities were shown to 

### be net importers of waste in 1989. Incinerators in Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Utah attracted Washington waste in their direction. Cement kilns in Missouri, Kansas,and Nebraska had similar effects. As long as the state is lacking in commercial waste management capacity, this picture of widely spread destinations for 

# 0 Washington waste should continue intact.



# o

44

# • • Figure 16 

# Net Flows ofDangerous Waste, 1989 

# •

UT

- - -1[)[

- - - - 

# PA

OR 

# 72,757



# II

IL 

# co 

# I!
:::: :::::::::

# :C:~ ::::::

# iii! Net importers to Washington**~.** 

## - - - .- -AK'

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ..., - - ---. 

# =-:- - -.: - - -

# m-----------.:--- ".

---- eN m ND 2,000


# o (2,000) (4,000)

(8,000) (6,000)

(10,000) (12,000) 

# Tons 4,000

# •

•

f f f 

# I

,



# • APPENDIX A Data Tables

### APPENDIX A-1 Recurrent Waste Generated by County, 1988-1989

CHANGE CHANGE COUNTY TONS (1989) TONS (1988) TONS PERCENT 1988-1989 1988-1989 Adams 

### 1 2 -1 -50.0 Asotin 

### 2 1 1 100.0 Benton 

### 32,094 480 .31,614 6,586.2 Chelan 

### 12,362 14,027 -1,665 -11.9 Clallam 

### 71 

### 36 35 97.2 Clark 

### 7,454 7,951 -497 -6.3 Columbia 

### 2 2 ·0 0.0 Cowlitz 

### 23,709 46,717 -23,008 -49.2 Douglas 

### 27 29 -2 -6.9 Ferry 

### 1 1 0 0.0 Franklin 

### 1,231 462 769 166.4 Garfield 

### 2 1 1 100.0 Grant 

### 251 266 -15 -5.7 Grays Harbor 

### 210 145 65 44.8 Island 

### 758 1,032 -274 -26.5 Jefferson 

### 82 68 14 20.6 King 

### 91,581 78,604 12,977 16.5 Kitsap 

### 5,643 4,565 1,078 23.6 Kittitas 

### 4 8 -4 -50.0 Klickitat 

### 5,030 3,676 1,354 36.8 Lewis 

### 482 

### 646 -164 -25.4 Lincoln 

### 8 1 7 700.0 Mason 

### 75 88 

### -13 -14.8 Okanogan 

### 1 9 -8 -88.9 Pacific 

### 5 17 -12 -70.6 Pend Oreille 

### 7,817 18,704 -10,887 -58.2 Pierce 

### 24,404 26,895 -2,491 -9.3 

# o



# o

o

# •

• COUNTY TONS (1989) TONS (1988) CHANGE CHANGE TONS PERCENT 1988-1989 1988-1989 

### San Juan 0 0 0 0.0 

### Skagit 11,370 1,974 9,396 475.9 

### Skamania 0 1 -1 -100.0 

### Snohomish 6,034 5,302 732 13.8 

### Spokane 17,695 14,045 3,650 25.9 

### Stevens 25,958 9,712 16,146 167.3 

### Thurston 454 567 -113 -20.0 

### Wahkiakum 0 1 -1 -100.0 

### Walla Walla 372 133 239 179.1 

### Whateom 2,779 5,652 -2,873 -50.8 

### Whitman 46 13 33 253.8 

### Yakima 525 

### , 337 188 55.8 WASlDNGTON 

### 278,426 215,582 62,844 29.2

### APPENDIX A-2 Net Flows of Dangerous Waste, 1989 (Tons)

STATE/COUNTRY IMPORTS TO EXPORTS FROM NET FLOW TO WASHINGTON WASHINGTON WASHINGTON Canada 160.3 79.8 +80.5 Alabama 0.0 15.2 -15.2 Alaska 1,232.7 0.0 +1,232.7 Arkansas 0.0 769.8 -769.8 Arizona 3.4 348.3 -344.9 California 4,254.2 5,739.5 -1,485.3 Colorado ") 3.0 19.8 -16.8 Hawaii 62.8 0.0 +62.8 Iowa 0.3 0.0 +0.3 Idaho 270.7 4,565.4 -4,294.7 Illinois 8.0 6,542.7 -6,534.7 Kansas 0.0 4,384.9 -4,384.9 Louisiana 0.0 226.1 -226.1 Michigan 0.0 0.7 -0.7 Missouri 0.0 405.7 -405.7 Montana 720.9 0.0 +720.9 Nebraska 0.0 1,719.5 -1,719.5 Nevada 10.7 9.2 +1.5 New Jersey- 1.3 0.0 +1.3 New York 0.0 0.5 -0.5 North Carolina 6.0 0.0 +6.0 North Dakota 45.2 0.0 +45.2 Ohio 0.0 5.1 -5.1 Oklahoma 0.0 0.8 -0.8 Oregon 11,013.2 83,771.0 -72,757.8 Pennsylvania 974.3 - 3,856.1 -2,881.8 South Carolina 0.0 0.1 -0.1 South Dakota 2.1 58.8 -56.7 Tennessee 0.0 0.1 -0.1 Texas 0.0 1,589.5 -1,589.5 Utah 5.2 416.8 -411.6 Wyoming 9.5- 0.0 +9.5 TOTALS 18,783.80 114,525.40 -95,741.60 

# o



# o

o

# •

•

f



# • APPENDIX B USEPA Waste Codes and Washington State-only Waste Codes

# I

I.

WASHINGTON STATE HAZARDOUS WASTE CODES AND DESCRIPTIONS Characteristics 0001 0002 0003 Ignitabile Corrosive Reactive EP Toxicity 0004 0005 0006 0007 0008 0009 0010 0011 0012 0013 0014 0015. 0016 0017 Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium Lead Mercury Selenium Silver Endrin Lindane Methoxychlor Toxaphene 2,4-0 2,4,s-TP Silvex Nonspecific Sources Generic:

electroplating degreasing: chloride, chlorinated solvents in FOOl

F002

F003

F004
FOOs
F006

F007 F008 F009 FOIO 

# • FOll F012 The following spent**halogenat~d** solvents used in Tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, methylene 1,1, I-trichloroethane, carbon tetrachloride, and fluorocarbons; and sludges from the recovery of these degreasing operations. (See footnote 1, below.) The following spent halogenated 'solvents: Tetrachloroethylene, methylene chloride, trichloroethylene, 1, 1, l-trichloroethane, chlorobenzene, 1,1,2-trichloro-l,2,2-trifluoroethane, ortho-dichlorobenzene, and trichlorofluoromethane; and the still bottoms ftom the recovery of these solvents. (See footnote 1, below. ) The following spent nonhalogenated solvents: Xylene, acetone, ethyl Acetate,ethyl benzene, ethyl ether, methyl isobutyl ketone, n-butyl alcohol,cyclohexanone, and methanol; and the still bottoms from the recovery of these solvents. The following spent nonhalogenated solvents: Cresols and cresylic acid, nitrobenzene; and the still bottoms from the recovery of these solvents. The following spent nonhalogenated solvents: Toluene, methyl ethyl ketone, carbon disulfide, isobutanol, pyridine; and the still bottoms from the recovery of these solvents. Wastewater treatment sludges from electroplating operations except from the following processes: (1) Sulfuric acid anodizing of aluminum; (2) tin plating on carbon steel; (3) zinc plating (segregated basis) on carbon steel; (4) aluminum or zinc-aluminum plating on carbon steel; (5) cleaning/stripping associated with tin, zinc, and aluminum plating on carbon steel; and (6) chemical etching and milling of aluminum. Spent cyanide plating bath solutions from operations. plating bath residues from the bottom of plating baths from electroplating operations where cyanides are used in the process. Spent stripping and cleaning bath solutions from electroplating operations where cyanides are used in the process. Quenching bath residues from oil baths from metal heat treating operations where cyanides are used in the process • spent cyanide solutions from salt bath pot cleaning from metal heat treating operations. Quenching wastewater treatment sludges from metal heat-treating operations where cyanides are used in the process.F019 F020

F02.1

F022

F023

F024

F026

F027

F028 Wastewater treatment sludges from the chemical conversion coating of aluminum •. Wastes (except wastewater and spent carbon from hydrogen chloride purification) from the production or manufacturing use (as a reactant, chemical intermediate, or component in a formulating process) of tri- or tetrachlorophenol, or of intermediates used to produce their pesticide derivatives. (This listing does not include wastes from the production of hexachlorophene from highly purified 2,4,S-trichlorophenol.) (See footnote 2, below.) Wastes (except wastewater and spent carbon from hydrogen chloride purification) from the production or manufacturing use (as a reactant, chemical intermediate, or component in a formulating**~rocess)** of pentachlorophenol, or of intermediates used to produce**~ts** derivatives. (See footnote 2, below.)

. Wastes (except wastewater and spent carbon from hydrogen chloride purification) from the manufacturing use (as a reactant, chemical intermediate, or component in a formulating process) of tetra-, penta-, or hexachlorobenzenes under alkaline**cond~tions.** (See footnote 2, below.) Wastes (except wastewater and spent carbon from hydrogen chloride purification) from the production of materials on equipment previously used for the production or manufacturing use (as a reactant, chemical intermediate, or component in a formulating process) of tri- and tetrachlorophenols. (See footnote 2, below.) (This listing does not include wastes from equipment used only for the production or use of hexachlorophene from highly puri.fLed 2,4,S-trichlorophenol.) Wastes, including but not limited to, distillation residues, heavy ends, tars, and reactor cleanout wastes from the production of chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons, having carbon content from one to five, utilizing free radical catalyzed processes. (See footnote 1, below.) (This listing does not include light ends, spent filters and filter aids, spent dessicants, wastewater, wastewater treatment sludges, spent catalysts,**~nd** wastes listed under specific sources, below. ) Wastes (except wastewater and spent carbon from hydrogen chloride purification) from the production of materials on equipment previously used for the manufacturing use (as a reactant, chemical intermediate, or component in a formulatinC:1 process) of tetra-, J penta-, or. hexachlorobenzene under**alkal~ne** conditions. (See footnote 2, below.) Discarded unused formulations containing tri-, tetra-, or pentachlorophenol or discarded unused formulations containing compounds derived from these chlorophenols. (See footnote 2, below.) (This listing does not include formulations containing hexachlorophene synthesized from prepurified 2,4,S-trichlorophenol as the sole component.) Residues resulting from the incineration or thermal treatment of soil contaminated with nonspecific sources wastes F020, F021, F022, F023, F026 and F027. 

# o

o



# o

# • Specific Sources Wood Preservation: K001 Bottom sediment sludge from the treatment of wastewaters from wood preserving processes that use creosote and/or pentachlorophenol. (See footnote 1, below.) Inorganic Pigments: K002 K003 K004 K005 K006
K007 K008 Wastewater treatment sludge from the production of chrome yellow and orange pigments.

. Wastewater treatment sludge from the production of molybdate orange pigments. Wastewater treatment sludge from the production of zinc yellow pigments. Wastewater treatment sludge from the production of chrome green pigments. Wastewater treatment sludge from the production of chrome oxide green pigments (anhydrous and**hydrated)~** Wastewater treatment sludge from the production of iron blue pigments. Oven residue from the production of chrome oxide green pigments. Organic Chemicals: 

# •

• K009 K010 KOll K013 KOl4 K015 K016 K017 K018 K019 K020 K021 K022 K023 K024 K025 K026 K027 K028 K029 K030 K083 K085 Distillation bottoms from the production of acetaldehyde from ethylene. Distillation side cuts from the production of acetaldehyde from ethylene. Bottom stream from the wastewater stripper in the production of acrylonitrile • Bottom stream from the acetonitrile column in the production of acrylonitrile. Bottoms from the acetonitrile purification column in the production of acrylonitrile. Still bottoms from the distillation of benzyl chloride. (See footnote 1, below.) Heavy ends or distillation residues from the production of carbon tetrachloride. (See footnote 1, below.) Heavy ends (still bottoms) from the purification column in the production of epichlorohydrin. (See footnote 1, below.) Heavy ends from the fractionation column in ethyl chloride production. (See footnote 1, below.) Heavy ends from**t~e** distillation of ethylene dichloride in ethylene dichloride production. (See footnote 1, below.) Heavy ends from the distillation of vinyl chloride in vinyl chloride monomer production. (See footnote 1, below.) Aqueous spent antimony catalyst waste from fluoromethanes production

.. (See footnote 1, below.)

. Distillation bottom tars from the production of phenol/acetone from cumene. Distillation light ends from the production of phthalic anhydride from naphthalene. Distillation bottoms from the production of phthalic anhydride from naphthalene. Distillation bottoms from the production of nitrobenzene by the nitration of benzene.**Strip~ing** still tails from the production of methyl ethyl**~yridines. Centr~fuge**  and distillation residues from toluene**di~socyanate** production. Spent catalyst from the hydrochlorinator reactor in the production of 1,1,1-trichloroethane. (See footnote 1, below.) Waste from the product steam stripper in the production of 1,1,1-trichloroethane. (See footnote 1, below.) Column bottoms or heavy ends from the combined production of trichloroethylene and perchloroethylene. (See footnote 1, below.) Distillation bottoms from aniline production. Distillation of fractionation column bottoms from the production of chlorobenzenes. (See footnote 1, below.)Kl03 K09S

KllS K116

,1 

# o

o Distillation light ends from the production of phthalic anhydride from ortho-xylene. Distillation bottoms from the production of phthalic anhydride from ortho-xylene. Distillation bottoms from the production of l,l,l-trichloroethane. (See footnote 1, below.) Heavy ends from the heavy ends column from the production of 1,1,1- trichloroethane (See footnote 1, below.) Process residues from aniline extraction from the production of aniline.

. Combined wastewater streams generated from nitrobenzene/aniline production.

. Separated aqueous stream from the reactor product washing step in the production of chlorobenzenes. (See footnote 1, below.) Product washwaters from the production of dinitrotoluene via nitration of toluene. Reaction by-product water from the dryin9 column in the production of toluenediamine via'hydrogenation of**d~nitrotoluene.** Condensed liquid light ends from the purification of toluenediamine in the production of toluenediamine via hydrogenation of dinitrotoluene. Vicinals from the purification of toluenediamine in the production of toluene diamine via**h~dro~enation** of dinitrotoluene. Heavy ends from the**purif~cat~on** of toluenediamine in the production of toluenediamine via hydrogenation of dinitrotoluene. Organic condensate from the solvent recovery column in the production of toluene diisocyanate via phosgenation of toluenediamine. (See footnote 1, below.) Explosives: Kll4 Kl13

K044 Wastewater treatment sludges from the manufacturing and processing of explosives. K04S Spent carbon from the treatment of wastewater containing explosives. K046 Wastewater treatment sludges from the manufacturing, formulation and loading of leadbased initiating compounds. K047 Pink/red water from TNT operations. Inorganic Chemicals: K07l Brine purification muds from the mercury cell process in chlorine production, where separately prepurified brine is not used. K073 Chlorinated hydrocarbon waste from the purification step of the diaphragm cell process using graphite anodes in chlorine production. (See footnote 1, below.) Kl06 Wastewater treatment sludge from the mercury cell process in chlorine production. Petroleum Refining: Kll2 KlOS KIll Kl04 K096 K094 K093

float from the petroleum refining K048 K049 KOSO KOSI ,KOS2 Dissolved air flotation (DAF) industry. Slop oil emulsion solids from the petroleum refining industry. Heat exchanger bundle cleaning sludge from the petroleum refining industry. API separator sludge from the petroleum refining industry'. Tank bottoms (leaded) from the petroleum refining industry. Iron and Steel: K06l Emission control dust/sludge from the primary production of steel in electric furnaces. K062 Spent pickle liquor' generated by steel finishing operations of facilities within the iron and steel industry (SIC Codes 331 and 332)

. 

# oK03l K032 K033 K034 K035 K036 K037 K038 K039 K040 K04l K042
K043 K097 K098 

# • K099
f K123 

### f f K124 K125 K126

Kl02 K084 KlOl 

# •

• Pesticides:**By~roduct** salts generated in the production of MSMA and cacodylic aC1.d. Wastewater treatment sludge from the production of chlordane. (See footnote 3, below.) Wastewater and scrub water from the chlorination of cyclopentadiene in the production of chlordane. (See footnote 3, below.) Filter solids from the filtration of hexachlorocyclopentadiene in the production of chlordane. (See footnote 3, below.) Wastewater treatment sludges generated in the production of creosote. Still bottoms from toluene reclamation distillation in the production of disulfoton. Wastewater treatment sludges from the production of disulfoton. Wastewater from the wash1.ng and stripping of phorate production •

.(See footnote 3, below.)

. Filter cake from the filtration of diethylphosphorodithioic acid in the production of phorate. (See footnote 3, below.) Wastewater treatment sludge from the production of phorate

. (See footnote 3, below.) Wastewater treatment sludge from the production of toxaphene. (See footnote 3, below.) Heavy ends or distillation residues from the distillation of tetrachlorobenzene in the production of 2,4,5-T. (See footnote 1, below. ) 2,6-0ichlorophenol waste from the production of 2,4-0. (See footnote 1, below.) Vacuum stripper discharge from the chlordane chlorinator in the production of chlordane. (See footnote 3, below.) Untreated process wastewater from·the production of toxaphene. (See footnote 3, below.) Untreated wastewater from the production of 2,4-0. (See footnote 1, below. ) Process wastewater (including supernates, filtrates, and wastewaters) from the production of ethylenebisdithiocarbamic acid and its salts. Reactor vent scrubber water from the production of ethylenebisdithiocarbamic acid and its salts. Filtration, evaporation, and centrifugation solids from the production of ethylenebisdithiocarbamic acid and its salts. Baghouse dust and floor sweepings in milling and packaging operations from the production or formulation of ethylenebisdithiocarbamic acid and its salts. Secondary Lead: K069 Emission control dust/sludge from secondary lead smelting. KIOO Waste leaching solution from acid leaching of emission control dust/sludge from secondary lead smelting. Veterinary Pharmaceuticals: Wastewater treatment sludges generated during the production of veterinarr pharmaceuticals from arsenic or organo-arsenic compounds. Oistillat1.on tar residues from the distillation of aniline-based compounds in the production of veterinary pharmaceuticals from arsenic or organo-arsenic compounds.

. Residue from the use of activated carbon for decolorization in the production of veterinary pharmaceuticals from arsenic or organo-arsenic compounds.

. Ink Formulation: K086 Solvent washes and sludges, caustic washes and sludges, or water washes and sludges from cleaning tubs and equipment used in the formulation of ink from pigments, driers, soaps, and stabilizers containing chromium and lead.WAC 173-303-9903 Discarded chemical products list. ACUTELY DANGEROUS CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 

# o
P023 U001 U034 P002 POS7 POS8 U144 P066 U003 POOl P002 U006 P003 U007 U008 U009 P070 P004 POOS P006 P007 P008 P009 P119 U012 POlO P012 POll POll P012 P038 U01S P054 U010
P013 U1S7 U017 U018 U018 U094 U012 P024 U049 U093 U158 

## pon P028 U019 U038
U030 U037 U190 U070

. U071

U072 U017 U223 U239 U201 U127 U056 U188 Acetaldehyde, chloroAcetaldehyde Acetaldehyde, trichloroAcetamide, N-(aminothioxomethyl)- Acetamide, 2-fluoroAcetic acid, fluoro-, sodium salt Acetic acid, lead salt Acetimidic acid, N-[(Methylcarbamoyl)oxy]thio-, methyl ester Acetonitrile 3-(alpha-Acetonyl-benzyl)-4-hydroxycoumarin and salts 1-Acetly-2-thiourea Acetyl chloride Acrolein Acrylamide Acrylic acid Acrylonitrile Ald carb Aldrin Allyl alcohol Aluminum phosphide (R,T) S-(Aminomethyl-3-isoxazolol 4-alpha-Aminopyridine Ammonium picrate Ammonium vanadate Aniline Arsenic acid Arsenic 

### (III) oxide Arsenic (V) oxide Arsenic pentoxide Arsenic trioxide Arsine, diethylAzaserine Aziridine Azirino(2',3':3,4)pyrrolo(1,2a)indole-4,7-dione, , -amino-8[«aminocarbonyl)oxy) methyl]-l,la,2,8,8a,8b- hexahydro-8a-methoxy-S-methyl- Barium cyanide Benz[j]aceanthrylene, 1,2-dihydro-3-methyl- Benzal choride Benz[a] anthracene 1,2-Benzanthracene 1,2-Benzanthracene, 7,l2-dimethyl- Benzenamine Benzenamine, 4-chloroBenzenamine, 4-chloro-2-methylBenzenamine,**~,N-dimethyl-4-(phenylazo)­** Benzenamine, 4-4-methylenebis(2-chloro- Benzenamine, 4-nitroBenzene, (chloromethy)- Benzene Benzeneacetic acid, 4-chloro-alpha-(4-chlorophenyl)-alpha-hydroxy, ethyl ester Benzene, 1-bromo-4-phenoxy Benzene, chloro1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid anhydride Benzene, 1,2-dichloroBenzene, 1,3-dichloroBenzene, l,4-dichloroBenzene, (dichloromethy)- Benzene, 1,3-diisocyanatomethylBenzene, dimethyl- 1,3-Benzenediol Benzene, hexachloroBenzene, hexahydroBenzene, hydroxy

# o

o

# •

• U220 UI05 UI06 U055 U169 U183 U185 U020 U020 U207 U023 P042 P014 U022 U021 U197 U023 U050 P028 POlS U085 U021 U073 U095 U024 U027 P016 U246 P017 U225 U030 P018 U128 U035 U160 U053 U074 U032 P021 P123 U178 U176 Ul77 U219 PI03 U097 P022 P022 U156 U033 U211 P095 U033 U035 U036 P033 U026 P023 P024 U037 U039 U041 U042 U044 U046 U047 U048 P026 P027 U049 U032**Benze~e,** methylBenzene, I-methyl-1-2, 4-dinitro Benzene, I-methyl-2, 6-dinitroBenzene, (l,methylethyl)- Benzene, nitroBenzene, pentachloro Benzene, pentachloronitroBenzenesulfonic acid chloride Benzensulfonyl chloride Benzene, 1,2,4,5-tetrachloroBenzene, (trichloromethyl) 1,2-Benzenediol, '4-[l-hydroxy-2-(methyl-amino)ethyl]- Benzenethiol 3,4-Benzopyrene Benzidine p-Benzoquinone Benzotrichloride 1,2-Benzphenanthrene Benzyl chloride Beryllium dust 2,2'-Bioxirane '1,1"-Biphenyl)-4,4'-diamine (1,1'-Biphenyl-4,4'-diamine, 3,3'-dichloro- (1, l'-Biphenyl)-4, 4'-diamine, 3, 3 '-dimethylBis(2-chloroethoxy) methane Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether Bix(chloromethyl) ether Bromine cyanide Bromoacetone Bromoform 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Brucine 1,3-Butadiene, l,1,2,3,4,4-hexachloroButanoic acid, 4 [bis(2 chloroethyl) amino] benzene 2-Butanone peroxide 2-Butenal 2-Butene, 1,4-dichloroCalcium chromate Calcium cyanide Camphene, octachloroCarbamic acid, methylnitroso-, ethyl ester Carbamide, N-ethyl-N-nitrosoCarbamide, N-methyl-N-nitroso- Carbamide, thioCarbamimidoselenoic acid Carbamoyl chloride, dimethylCarbon bisulfide Carbon disulfide Carbonochloridic acid, methyl ester Carbon oxyfluoride Carbon tetrachloride Carbonyl chloride Carbonyl fluoride Chlorambucil Chlordane, technical Chlorine cyanide Chlornaphazine Chloroacetaldehyde p-Chloroaniline Chlorobenzene 4-Chloro-m-cresol l-Chloro-2,3-epoxypropane 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether Chloroform Chloromethyl methyl ether beta-Chloronaphthalene o-Chlorophenol l-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea 3-Chloropropionitrile 4-Chlor-o-toluidine, hydrochloride Chromic acid, calcium saltU050 P029 U052 U052 U053 U055 P030 P031 U246 P033 U197 U056 U057 U130 U058 U240 U060 U061. U142 U062 U133 U063 U063 U064 U064 U066 U062 U070 U07l U072 U073 U074 U075 U060 U061 U078 U079 U025 U081 U082 U240 P036 U083 U084 P037 U085 P038 P039 U087 P041 P040 P043 P044 U092 U093 U094 U095 U096 U097 U099· P045 P07l P082 P046 U103 P047 P034 P048 U105 Chrysene Copper cyanides Cresols Cresylic acid Crotonaldehyde Cummene Cyanides (soluble cyanide salts), not elsewhere specified Cyanogen Cyanogen bromide Cyanogen chloride 1,4-Cyclohexadienedione Cyclohexane Cyclohexanone 1,3-Cyclopentadiene, 1,2,3,4,5,5-hexa-chloroCyclophosphamide 2,4-D, salts and esters DDD DDT**Decachlorooctahydro-1,3,4-metheno~2H** cyclobuta[c,d)-pentalen-2-one Diallate Diamine Dibenz[a,h)anthracene 1,2:5,6-Dibenzanthracene 1,2:7,8-Dibenzopyrene Dibenz[a,i)pyrene**1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropro~ane** . S-(2,3-Dichloroallyl)**d~isopropylthiocarbamate** o-Dichlorobenzene m-Dichlorobenzene p-Dichlorobenzene**3~3'-Dichlorobenzidine** 1,4-Dichloro-2-butene Dichlorodifluoromethane Dichloro diphenyl dichloroethane Dichloro diphenyl trichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethylene 1,2-Dichlorocthylene Dichloroethyl ether 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2,6-Dichlorophenol 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, salts and esters Dichlorophenylarsine 1,2-Dichlbropropane 1,3-Dichloropropene Dieldrin 1, 2:3, 4-Diepoxybutane Diethylarsine

. O,O-Diethyl S-[2-(ethylthio)ethyl) phosphorodithioate O,O-Diethyl-s-methyl-dithiophosphate Diethrl-p-nitrophenyl phosphate**O,O-D~ethyl** O-pyrazenyl phosphorothioate Diisopropyl fluorophosphate Dimethoate Dimethylamine Dimethylaminoazobenzene 7, 12-Dimethylbenz (aJ anthracene**3,3'-Dimethylbenz~d~ne alpha,alpha~Dimethylbenzylhydroperoxide**  Dimethylcarbamoyl chloride 1,2-Dimethylhydrazine

. 3,3-Dimethyl-1-(methylthio)-2-butanone, O-[(methylamino)carbonyl) oxime O,O-Dimethyl O-p-nitrophenyl phosphorothioate Dimethylnitrosamine alpha, alpha-Dimethylphenethylamine Dimethyl sulfate 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol and, salts 4,6-Dinitro-o-cyclohexylphenol 2,4-Dinitrophenol**2,4-Dinitroto~uene** 

# o

o

o

-I

# •

•

• Ul06 P020 Ul09 P03S UllO Ulll P039 P049 Pl09 POSO P088 POSI P042 UOOI U174 P046 U067 U076 U077 U1l4 U13l U024 U247 U003 U02S U184 U208 U209 U227 P084 U043 UO.42 U078 U079 U2l0 U006 PlOl U038 U1l4 U067 U077 UllS POS4 U076 P097 POS6 POS7 POS8 U122 P06S U12S U147 U12S U126 U163 POS9 U127 U128 U129 U130 POSI
P037
Ul3l P060 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Dinoseb 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine Diphosphoramide, octamethyl Dipropylamine Di-n-propylnitrosamine Disulfoton 2,4-Dithiobiuret Dithiopyrophosphoric acid, tetraethyl ester Endosulfan Endothall Endrin Epinephrine Ethanal Ethanamine, N-ethyl-N-nitrosoEthanamine, 1,1 -dimethyl-2-phenylEthane, 1,2-dibromoEthane, l,l-dichloroEthane, 1,2-dichloro1,2-Ethanediylbiscarbamodithioic acid Ethane, 1,1,1,2,2,2-hexachloroEthane,**l,l'~[methylenebis(oxy)]** bis[2-chloroEthane, 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(p-methoxy phenyl) Ethanenitrile Ethane, 1,l'-oxybis[2-chloro- Ethane, pentachloroEthane, 1,1,1,2-tetrachloroEthane, 1,1,2,2-TetrachloroEthane, 1,1,2-trichloroEthenamine, N-methyl-N-nitroso Ethene, chloroEthane, 2-chloroethoxyEthene, l,l-dichloroEthene, trans-l,2-dichloroEthene, 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroEthanoyl chloride Ethyl cyanide Ethyl 4,4'-dichlorobenzilate Ethylenebis(dithiocarbamic acid), salts and esters Ethylene dibromide Ethylene dichloride Ethylene oxide Ethylenimine Ethylidene dichloride Fa,mphur Fluorine Fluoroacetamide Fluoroacetic acid, sodium salt Formaldehyde Fulminic acid, mercury (II) salt 2-Furancarboxaldehyde 2,S-Furandione Furfural Glycidylaldehyde Guanidine, N-nitroso-N-methyl-N'nitroHeptachlor Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma isomer) Hexachlorocyclopentadiene1,2,3,4,lO,lO-Hexachloro-6,7-epoxy1,4,4a,S,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-endo, endo-l,4,S,8-dimethanophthalene li 2,3,4,lO,lO-Hexachloro-6,7-epoxy1,4,4a,S,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-endo, exo1,4,S,8-dimethanonaphthalene Hexachloroethane1,2,3,4,lO,lO-Hexachloro-l,4,4a,S,8,8ahexahydro-l,4:S,8-endo, endo-dimethanonaphthaleneP004
P060 'U132 U243 P062 U133 P116 U099 UI09 P068 P063 P063 P096 U135 U096 U245 P064 P007 U142 U143 U144 U129 U147 U149 U151 P092 P065 U152 U092 P016' P112 U029 U045 U046 U068 U080 U075 U138 U211 P118 U153 U225 U121 U044 P059 U036 P066 P067 P068 P064 P069 P071 U029 U045 U156

. U226

U157 U158 U132 U068 U080 U122 U160 U138 U163 UOI0 U165 1,2,3,4, 10, 10-Hexachloro-l,4,4a, 5,8,8ahexahydro-l,4,5,8-endo, exodimethanonaphthalene Hexachlorohexahydro-endo, endo-dimethanonaphthalene Hexachlorophene Hexachloropropene Hexaethyl tetraphosphate Hydrazine Hydrazinecarbothioamide Hydrazine, 1,2-dimethyl- Hydrazine, 1,2-diphenyl- Hydrazine, methylHydrocyanic acid Hydrogen cyanide

. Hydrogen**phos~hide**

. Hydrogen sulfl.de

Hydroperoxide, 1-methyl-1-phenylethyl- Indomethacin Isocyanic acid, methyl ester 3(2H)-Isoxazolone, 5-(aminomethy1)- Kepone Lasiocarpine Lead acetate Lindane Maleic anhrdride Malononitr le Mercury Mercury, (acetato-O)phenylMercury fulminate Methacrylonitrile Methanamine, N-methyl- Methane, oxybis(chloro)- Methane, tetranitroMethane, bromoMethane, chloroMethane, chloromethyoxy- Methane, dibromoMethane, dich1oroMethane, dichlorodifluoroMethane, iodo-

. Methane, tetrachloro-

. Methanethiol, trichloroMethanethiol Methane, tribromo Methane, trichlorofluoroMethane, trichloro-

. 4,7-Methano-1H-indene, 1,4,5,6,7,8,8heptachloro-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro4,7-Methanoindan, 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,8-octachloro-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro- Methomyl 2-Methylaziridine Methyl hydrazine Methyl isocyanate 2-Methyllactonitrite Methyl parathion Methyl bromide Methyl chloride Methyl, chlorocarbonate Methylchloroform 3-Methylcholanthrene 4,4'-Methylenebis(2-chloroaniline) 2,2'-Methylenebis(3,4,6-trichlorophenol) Methylene bromide Methylene chloride Methylene oxide Methyl ethrl ketone peroxide Methyl iodl.de N-Methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine Mitomycin C Naphthalene, 

# o

o

opentachloro2, 3, 4, 6-tetrachloro2, 4, S-trichloro2,4,6-trichloro-) Phenol, Phenol, Phenol, Phenol, F027 F027 F027 F027 Naphthalene, 2-chlorol,4-Naphthalenedione 2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 3,3'- [(3,3'-dimethyl-(l,l'-biphenyl)-4,4' diyl)]-bis (azo)bis(S-amino-4- hydroxy)-,tetrasodium salt l,4,Naphthoquinone l-Naphthylamine 2-Naphthylamine alpha-Naphthylamine beta-Naphthylamine 2-Naphthylamine, N,N'-bis(2-chloro-ethyl)- alpha-Naphthylthiourea Nickel carbonyl Nickel cyanide Nickel (II) cyanide Nickel tetracarbonyl Nicotine and salts Nitric oxide p-Nitroaniline Nitrobenzene Nitrogen ,dioxide Nitrogen '(II) oxide Nitrogen (IV) oxide Nitroglycerine p-Nitrophenol**2-Nitropro~ane N-Nitrosod~ethylamine**  N-Nitrosodimethylamine N-Nitroso-N-ethylurea N-Nitroso-N-methylurea N-Nitroso-N-methylurethane N-Nitrosomethylvinylamine N-Nitrosopiperidine

. N-Nitroso-N-propylamine S-Norbornene-2,3,-dimethanol,l,4,S,6,7,7-hexachloro, cyclic sulfite Octamethylpyrophosphoramide Osmium oxide Osmium tetroxide 7-0xabicyclo[2.2.I]heptane-2,3-dicarboxylic acid 2H-l, 3, 2-0xazaphosphorine,2- [bis (2-

. chloro- ethyl)amino]tetrahydro-,oxide 2- Oxirane Oxirane, 2-(chloromethyl)- Parathion Pentachlorobenzene Pentachloroethane Pentachloronitrobenzene (See F027 Pentachlorophenol) Phenol Phenol, Phenol, Phenol, Phenol, Phenol, Phenol, Phenol, Phenol, Phenol, Phenol, 2-cyclohexyl-4,6-dinitro2,4-dinitro2-methyl-4,6 dinitro-, and salts 2,4-dinitro-6-(l-methylpropyl)- 2,4,6-trinitro-, ammonium salt2-chloro4-chloro-3-methyl2,4-dichloro2,6-dichloro4-nitro- (See See See See Phenyl dichloroarsine Phenylmercuric acetate N-Phenylthoiurea Phorate Phosgene Phosphine Phosphoric acid, diethyl p-nitrophenyl ester U047 Ul66 U236

Ul66 Ul67 Ul68 Ul67 Ul68 U026 P072 P073 P074 P074 P073 P07S P076 

### »trn Ul69 P078 P076 P078 P08l Ul70 Ul71 Ul74 P082 Ul76 Ul77 Ul78 P084 Ul79 Ulll POSO P08S P087 P087 P088 UOS8 UllS U04l P089 Ul83 Ul84 Ul8S Ul88 P034 P048 P047 P020 P009 U048 U039 U08l U082 Ul70

P036 P092 P093 P094 P09S P096 P04l 

# • • •P044 P043 P094 P097 P089 P040 U189 U190 U191 PllO P098 P099 P070 U194 UllO U066 U149 P101 P027 P079 Ul71 U027 P081 U23S U126 P017 P102 P003 U007 U084 U243 U009 U1S2 U008. POOS U194 U083 P067 P102 P008 P07S U196 U179 U191 P1ll U201 P103 U01S P104 P10S P106 P107 P108 P018 P108 U13S U103 PllS U189 U208 U209 U210 U212 P109 PllO Pll1 P1l2 Phosphorodithioic acid, O,O-dimethyl S-[2-(methylamino)-2-oxoethyl] ester

. Phosphorofluoridic acid,**bis(l-methyl-ethyl~-ester** . Phosphorothiac acid, O,O-diethyl S-(ethylth1o)methyl ester Phosphorothioic acid, O,O-dimethyl O-[p-«dimethylamino)-sulfonyl) pheny]ester Phospborothioic acid, O,O-diethyl O-(p-ni-trophenyl)ester Phosphorothioic acid, O,O-diethy1 O-pyra-zinyl ester Phosphorus sulfide Phthalic anhydride 2-Pico1ine Plumbane, tetraethylPotassium cyanide Potassium s1lver cyanide Propanal, 2-methyl-2(methylthio)-O-[(methylamino)carbonyl]oxime 1-Propanamine 1-Propanamine, N-propylPropane, 1,2-dibromo-3-chloroPropanedinitrile Propanenitrile Propanenitrile, 3-chloro2-hydroxy-2-methylPropane, 2-nitroPropane, 2,2'oxybis[2-chloro- 1,2,3-Propanetriol, trinitrate1-Propanol, 2,3-dibromo-, phosphate (3:1) 1-Propanol, 2,3-epoxy2-Propanone, 1-bromoPropargyl alcohol 2-Propenal 2-Propenamide Propene, l,3-dichloro1-Propene, 1,1,2,3,3,3-hexachloro2-Propenenitrile 2-Propenenitrile, 2-methyl2-Propenoic acid 2-Propen-1-ol (See F027 Propionic acid, 2-(2,4,5- trichlorophenoxy)- n-Propylamine Propylene dichloride 1,2-Propylenimine 2-Propyn-1-ol 4-Pyridinamine I Pyr1dine, (S)-3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-, and salts Pyridine Pyridine, hexahydro-N-nitrosoPyridine,2-methylPyrophosphoric acid, tetraethyl ester Resorcinol Selenourea L-Serine, diazoacetate (ester) Silver cyanide (See F027 Silvex) Sodium azide

. Sodium cyanide Strontium sulfide Strychnidin-10-one, and salts Strychnidin-10-one, 2,3-dimethoxy- Strychnine and salts Sulfur hydride Sulfuric acid, dimethyl ester Sulfuric acid, thallium (I) salt Sulfur phosphide (See F027 2,4,S-T See F027 1, 2,4, S-Tetrachlorobenzene)**1,1,~,2-Tetrachloroethane** 1,1,2",2-Tetrachlroethane Tetrachloroethylene 2, 3, 4, 6-Tetrachlorophenol Tetraethyldithiopyrophosphate Tetraethyl lead Tetraethylpyrophosphate Tetranitromethane 

# o

o



# o

# •

"---



# • P062 P1l3 P1l3 P1l4 PllS P04S P049· U153 P014 P1l6 U219 P026

. P072· P093 U220, U223 P123 U226 U227 U228 U228 P1l8. U121 U232 U233

. U235 U236 U237 U237 P1l9 P120

. P120 ' U043 POOl U239 P121 P122**Tetra~hosphoric** acid, hexaethyl ester Thalll.c oxide Thallium (III) oxide Thallium (I) selenide Thallium 

### (I) sulfate Thiofanox. Thiomidodicarbonic diamide Thiomethanol Thiophenol

. Thiosemicarbazide Thiourea Thiourea, (2-chlorophenyl)- Thiourea, 1-naphthalenyl- Thiourea, phenylToluene Toluene diisocyanate Toxaphene 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Trichloroethylene Trichloromethanethiol Trichloromonofluoromethane (See F027 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol See F027 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol) 2,4,S-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid, salts and esters 2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxy-propionic acid, salts and esters Tris(2,3-disbromopropyl) phosphate Trypan blue Uracil, 5[bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]- Uracil mustard Vanadic acid, ammonium salt Vanadium pentoxide Vanadium**(V~** oxide Vinyl chlor1.de Warfarin 

# xrl e ne . Z nc cyanide

Zinc phosphideU187 U005 U112 U214 U002 U004 U005 U150 U328 U353 U011 U014 U016 U016 U014 U222 U181 U028 U069 U088 U102 U107 U203 U141 U090 U234. U202 U120 U091 U244 U028 Ul72 U031. U159 U031 U136 U238 U215 U051 U059 U221 U069 U192 U108 U086 U088 U089 U148 U090 U091 U098 UI01 U102 U107 U108 U117 U218 U173 U004 U112 U113 U238 U116 U117 U118 U119 U139 MODERATELY DANGEROUS CHEMICAL PRODUCTS

Acetamide, N-(4-ethoxyphenyl)- Acetamide, N-9a-fluoren-2-yl- Acetic acid, ethyl ester Acetic acid, thallium (I) salt Acetone Acetophenone 2-Acetylaminofluorene Alanine, 3-[p-bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]phenyl-, 

### L. 2-Amino-1-methylbenzene

. 4-Amino-1-methylbenzene Amitrole Auramine Benz[c]acridine 3,4-Benzacridine Benzenamine,**4,4-carboni~idoylbis(N,N-dimethyl** Benzenamine, 2-methyl, hydrochloride , Benzenamine, 2-methyl-S-nitro 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, ',[bis(2-ethyl-hexyl)] ester 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, dibutyl,ester 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, diethyl,ester 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, dimethYl ester 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, di-n-octyl ester ,Benzene, 1,2-methylenedioxy-4-allylBenzene, 1,2-methylenedioxy-4-propenylBenzene, 1,2-methylenedioxy-4-propylBenzene, 1,3,S-trinitro1,2-senzisothiazilin-3-one, 1, I-dioxide, and salts Benzo[j,k]lfluorene (1, 1 '-Biphenyl)-4-'-diamine,**3,3'~** dimeth-oxyBiS(dimethylthiocarbOmOrl) disulfide Bis(2-ethythoxyl)**phth~** ate 1-Butanamine, N-butyl-N-nitrosoI-Butanol 2-Butanone n-Butyl alcohol Cacodylic acid Carbamic acid, ethyl ester Carbonic acid, dithallium (I) salt Creosote Daunomycin Diaminotoluene Dibutrl phthalate**3,5-D~chloro-N-(1,1-dimethyl-2-propynyl)** benzamide 1,4-Diethylene dioxide N,N-Diethylhydrazine Diethyl phthalate Diethylstilbestrol 1,2-Dihydro-3-,6-pyridizinedione Dihydrosafrole 3,3'-Dimethoxybenzidine 1,1-Dimethylhydrazine 2,4-Dimethylphenol Dimethyl phthalate Di-n-octyl phthalate l,4-Dioxane Ethane, 1,l'-oxybisEthanethioamide Ethanol, 2,2-(nitrosoimino)bisEthanone, 1-phenylEthyl acetate Ethyl acrylate Ethyl carbamate (urethan) Ethylene thiourea Ethyl ether Ethyl methacrylate Ethyl methanesulfonate Ferric dextran 

# o

o

o

# •

•

• U120 U123 U124 U213 U124 U206 U086· U098 U134 U134 U136 U116 U137 U139 U140 U141 U145 U146 U148 U150 U119

. U123

U154 U155 U154 U186 U159 U161 U162 U161 U164 U059

Ul72 U173 U180 U181 U193 U182. U186 U187 U101 U137 U145 U087 U192 U193 U140 U002 U113 U118 U162 U155 U164' U180 U200 U202 U203 U204 U204 U205 U089 U206 U205 U213 U214 U215 U216 U217 F1uoranthene Formic Acid Furan Furan, tetrahydroFurfuran

. D-Glucopyranose,**2-deoxy-2(3-methyl-3-nitrosoureido)~** Hydraxine, 1,2-diethyl- Hydrazine, 1,1-dimethylHydrofluoric acid Hydrogen fluoride Hydroxydimethylarsine oxide 2-Imidazolidinethione Indeno[l,2,3-cd)pyrene Iron dextran Isobutyl alcohol Isosafrole Lead phosphate Lead subacetate Maleic hydrazide Melphalan Methanesulfonic acid, ethyl ester Methanoic acid Methanol Methapyrilene Methyl alcohol 1-Methylbutadiene Methyl ethyl ketone Methyl isobutyl ketone Methyl**methac~ylate** 4 Methyl 2 pentanone Methylthiouraci.l 5, 12-Naphthacenedione, (8S-cis)-8-acetyl-10-[(3-amino-2,3,6-trideoxyalpha-L-lyxo-hexopyranosyl)oxrl)-**7,8,9,10-tetrahydro-6,8,11-tr~hydroxy-I-methoxy** N-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine N-Nitrosodiethanolamine N-Nitrosopyrrolidine 5-Nitro-o-toluidine 1,2-0xathiolane, 2,2-dioxide Paraldehyde 1,3-Pentadiene Phenacetin Phenol, 2,4-dimethyl1,10-(1,2-phenylene)pyrene Phosphoric acid, Lead salt Phosphorodithioic acid, O,O-diethyl-,S-methyl ester Pronamide 1,3-Propane sultone I-Propanol, 2-methyl2-Propanone 2-Propenoic acid, ethyl ester 2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, ethyl ester 2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, methyl ester Pyridine, 2-[(2dimethylamino) ethyl)-2-phenylamino 4 (IH)-Pyrimidinone, 2,3-dihydro-6-methyl-2-thioxopyrrole, tetrahydro-N-nitrosoReserpine Saccharin and salts Safrole Selenious acid Selenium dioxide Selenium disulfide 4,4'-Stilbenediol, alpha,alpha'-diethylStreptozotocin Sulfur selenide Tetrahydrofuran Thallium (I) acetate Thallium (I) carbonate Thallium (I) chloride Thallium (I) nitrateU218 U244 U221 U328 U3S3 U222 U011 U234 U182 U200 Thioacetamide Thiran Toluenediamine o,..Toluidine p"'Toluidine O-Toluidine hydrochloride 1H-1,2,4-Triazol-3-amine sym-Trinitrobenzene**1~3,S-Trioxane,** 2,4,S-trimethyl- YohLmban-16-carboxylic acid, ll,17-di,..**methoxr-18-[(3,4,S-trimethO~y** benzoy )oxy]-,methyl ester



# .....................................................................- 

# . 

# 0'



# a

C)

# .'



# •

• COkingz K060 Ammonia still-lime sludge from coking operations. K087 Decanter tank tar sludge from coking operations. Footnotes 1 These wastes contain or may contain halogenated hydz.:ocarbons. Although WAC: 173-303-082 states that these wastes are DW, WAC 173-303-070 (5), special knowledge, requires generators who know that their waste .corrta Lne greater than one percent of these listed halogenated hydrocarbons to designate the1r waste EHW. 2 For wastes listed with the dangerous waste numbers F020, F021, F022, F023, F026, or F027 the quantity exclusion limit is 2.2 lbs. (1 kg) per month or per' batch. 3 These wastes contain or may contain X Category toxic constituents. Although WAC, 173-303-082 states that these wastes are DW, WAC 173-303-070(5),**s~ci:al** knowledge, requires generators who know that their waste conta1ns greater than 0.1 percent of these listed toxic constituents ,to designate their waste EHW•. state Sources WOOl The following wastes generated from the salvaging, rebuilding, or**discardin~** 'of transformers or capacitors which contain polychlor1nated biphenyls (PCB): Cooling and insulating fluids; cores, including core papers, from unrinsed transformers and capacitors;, transformers and capacitors which will no longer be used for their intended use, except for those transformers or capacitors which have been rinsed; and, rinsate from the rinsing of transformers and'capacitors. 'For the purposes of this listing, the rinsing of PCB containing items shall be conducted as follows: First, the item is drained of all free flowing liquid; second, the item is filled with solvent and allowed to stand for at least eighteen hours; last, the item is drained thoroughly and the solvent is collected. Solvents may include kerosene, xylene, toluene and other solvents in which PCB are readily soluble. (Note-Certain PCB wastes are excluded 'from this listing under WAC 173-303-071 (3)(k). The generator should check that section to determine if his PCB waste is excluded from'the requirements of chapter 173-303 WAC.)

### WASlDNGTON DANGEROUS WASTE NuMBERS TABLE

Dangerous Waste Criteria Designation Waste Number 

### Toxic dangerous waste EHW WTOI DW WT02

Pe.rsistent d!IDgerous waste Halogenated hydrocarbons EHW WPOI DW WP02 

### Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons EHW WP03


### Carcinogenic dangerous waste EHW WCOI DW WC02 

# o

Labpack waste EHW WLOI i DW WL02 

# C Polychlorinated biphenyls <pCB> DW WOOl



# o

# •

•

• APPENDIX C

i 

# FORM EXAMPLES Form 4 and· 

# Form 5

# Form 4 

# 1989 

# GENERATOR ANNUAL DANGEROUS WASTE REPORT
PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE - B

.... or Black Ink Only - (Form dlllllned lor

.... on Elltl112 pllc") !Jpewrller) U

.. aplclb., between ...,,, c""acllr 

# 1989 Form 4

1. EPA/STATE HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER

.....-.. "'-'-' -

.......---.......---..---....--------'-------------------------1

ext. 

# [[ill



# [0]-[0]- [0]

[]]]]I] 

# [0]

.[0]

-

# OJ]]**~.** SITE CONTACT PERSON, AND TITLE PHONE NUMBER 2. COMPANY NAME

........ -' .--_ .......

# __..**_._._-----------------------------~**

7. WASHINGTON DEPT. -OF REVENUE REGISTRATION (UBI) NUMBER 6. SITE LOCATION COUNTY

9: SITE EMPLOYMENT ON DECEMBER 31, 1989 8. STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION (SIC).CODES I--,----

....-----------------------------------------i Postmarked No laler Than MARCH 1, 1990 SEND TO: DEPT. OF ECOLOGY Hazardous Waete Seclion Attn: Annual RapOrt, RIS Bldg. 4 Mall Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504-8711 5. SITE LOCATION ADDRESS Aael,lance 1-800-874-2022 (2061 45lHl387 DUE DATE: PLACE THE LABEL HERE

DATE RECEIVED

Verilied

__ 08t8

__ BllchNo.

__ Init. . Date _ Inil.

_ ........ _._ .. 0818. •**~._** ..-.**r~~''-'** ...._--.- Revision 

### 0 Pages

__ 

### ,,,,1. Dat.

_ '0 ••COLOOY UI' ONLY

'OR .COLOOY UI.·ONLY You !!!!!m complete Sections 1 through 4 in addition to placing the label here. 00 not cross oul incorrecl information. 1- ----'-_--1 4

. COMPANY MAILING ADDRESS

10. REGULATORY STATUS CERTIFICATION-Rerer 10 the instructions and the "Guide For Hazardous Waste 

# CJ
Generators" (1988 or Firat Edition) to complete this aection. Mark only one entry by placing your initials in Ihe A 

### r-I B C 

### r-I 0 

### r--I E 

### r-1 Ib 

# I F 

### r--I apece provided. II none of these conditione apply to you. skip this s.ection and complete the continuation aheet(s).

. 

### L--.J.

.L--.J

.L--.J

. L--.J ! !! S. • L--...J 11. CERTIF'CATION-I cartlf't under "'"8I1y ot law lhall have perannalty examined and am 'am,lIar with Ihelnforrnatlon aubmitted in this and .'1 attached document., end that baaed on my inquIry 0' tt'O,. tndlvidua•• tmmedialely r.spons'bJe for obtaining the in'ormation' believe 'hat the submitted intormation is true. accurate. and complnte. lam aware that there are significant penallies 'or submitting 'al•• in'ormatton. including the poaaibUhy 0' fine and impriaonment.

.

PmNl nn Tyr, ".

...," 

## --_.

__

## ._-_._- 

# o o 

# o

# •**----~~-----~~-~** 

# • •

Form 4 

## 1989 

## GENERATOR ANNUAL DANGEROUS WASTE REPORT 1989 Form 4

'2. YOUR EPA/STATE 1.0. NUMBER '3. RECEIVING FACILITY (lSD) 

### .51.'. 

# CD ZIP: DJJJJ , •. TRANSPORTER NAME:

_ EPA/STATE 1.0. NUMBER ADDRESS: 

### -==,.---;====
=Ci'Y: 

### . 51.'.

# CD ZIP:DJJJJ City: NAME:_

.... .
_ ADDRESS: •

__

### -==:-----======_

I 

## ! , 

# I I I ! ' EPA/STATE 1.0. NUMBER 

## 1if1 AI 

# iii iii OJ] I ' i 

### ! :

A. Menlf

..t Document Number C. 15. WASTE IDENTIFICATION L 

# , N E B. Msnll

..t Shipment

Dlle (MIA DO YY)**PIly~ic.1** i E. Ststs IChemk:.1 Slllus S-Solld 

### I Hstu,e L=Uquld O-Orc_ G-Sludgell=lnorpnic M=Compr•••ed G

.. F. Waste Description (see Instructions) G. D

...gerous W

..te Number (_InstructionS snd WAC. 173-303) H. Waa.e 0

.. Ion... lion o-ow E-EHW I. Amount

of W••t. J. w K. ec ForTSO 10 FKIUty**~:** UMOnI, T

J J J J J



# +-++- .+.\. 

### 1- 

# +++ -++.+-

I J J J J J 

### "I-H" -f I \
.. I I
J J J**J_.+_~_** j-+

..\

.. 

### 1-·\ I· 

# I -·H-·\ 

### I 

### I: 

# I -.H-- t 

### ··+-1· f·



### H-II'II 

# -1-++-**~-+++-**
J


### '-1+1-··1·-1-1- 

# -++!+ \. \-

--H-+ -+1-+-



# . t-H--++-+-

.--1--.---------1-..-- ... _.

# ~-+- .. - >--
..

# t:::~J-:::t~:-.::===:::::.-- 

# ..----.----------+---+--+--+-------+--r-t---t-i

## ~_t_-+__+. 1. 

# -.1-+

_

..

# ~-r_._.-------**~.---.** ".... '" 

# ·1· 

# I

.. 

# I 

# ----r-t-··--·;---1··----·--·--- 1---------.-----.--

- I 

## 1·-

- -- ..- -·---·--------------------t----t----t-·--l---------f--I -H

.--+ ----..

# ----.-:::-~- 

# -!-.1-----·-·---- :--.------t-----t---t-

.. --+-----t---t-t---+-i



## _. ··-·1 

# I

.. 

# l

.. ----..--.----------+-
........

### -+---+--+------+--++-+-I

.-- f-.-----

.... ----+-
..-- - 

# Iii

_

# ~----_t_- .. - .•-

•..

# -.f- !

..--- i

..

# -.t:--~- 

# ._=

__**.~ ----t--~--_t-**  I ! ; 

# I 

# -I-----------+-------l·----T--··· 1-·---[""··---·····-..---------..--

16. COMMENTS (Enter information by section and/or line number-see instructions).

01

## 1989 

## TSD FACILITY ANNUAL DANGEROUS WASTE REPORT 1989· FormS ,,"usE PRINT OR TYPE lIorm c1eola_ 

### '0<

... on ED'. 112-Dlfchl**lYoo.~IorI.** BLUE OR BLACK INK ONLY

FACILITY NAME 2. EPA/STATE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE RECl!IYED 1. [W.A: ! 

# LU.: ! 

### !

# ill I ! ! 

### ! 

# I I I I 

## I I I I 

# ! i 

### ! I I I I I I I I

### I~ I I I I I**_.L~_..L ~~.**  

## ._--_
.._-----_._- --"._- ._--'.-- i 3. FACILITY LOCATION ADDRESS I 4. LOCATION COUNTY StrBBt or Description (see instructions) City State Zi 

# I, ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 

## ! I I I I I I I I I " I I I I " I 

### ! 

# n--,**.~.,.--,-,** I I 

## I· : 

# :-TTTn I !

. I ; I I I ; I i L_: : ,.; i I 5. MAILING ADDRESS FOR ANNUAL REPORT CORRESPONDENCE Street Of P.O.Box City Stste Z'
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I! I I I I I I I IJIII I I I II I I I I 

### I I I -r
.. 

# '----.,-1 Irnl:_ 0"0'

____. I I : : 

### i :- iii. 1nII:_ 0.10'

___ I 6. CONTACT I I I I I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I i I Title I I I I I I I I I I i 

## I**rTTl-fT~-1** 

# I i 

### I 

# I '011:_ 0.'0'

____ ; Phone Vo,a,ed:_ 0.'0'

__ 81lch NWnbe'

___ 7. STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION (SIC) CODES 8. CLOSURE COST ESTIMATE 9. POST-CLOSURE COST ESTIMATE Primerv Seconderv O'her 

# $DJIIJID $.DJIIJID

I I I I I I I " I I I I I I SEND TO: 10. REGULATORY STATUS-If your facility meets any of the conditions below, 11. TOTAL WASTE IN STORAGE ON DEC. 31, 1989 DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY you are exempt from completing page 2 of the report. WEIGHT HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION (Check

_ ."

..._Ia'e box.II none.pply, co",ple'e'''' re"'_

.. of,

... ,eport.) STORAGE METHOD AMOUNT WASTE COOE· ATTN. Annual Reports R/6 No.4
01. Mail Stop PV-11 No regulated wastes were treated. stored, or disposed of at this site. Olympia, WA 98504-8711 

## 0,2. All wa.te. m.naged were prOduced b)' ameli quantit)' generator•. (S01C) Container lb."e•.drum. elo.) PIlon.NUIII""

.. Io, Ahl.'

.....:

... t ·1100-111<4·2022 03. (SeaaoMl**ToIF',,~)** All waste managed at this site was delisted or a petition approved for exemption of the (S02n Tank, above ground or (206) 459·6367 l waste pursuant to WAC 173-303-91 0 before calendar )'ear 1989.



## . []4. _4

__ .-.. _·

_____0

- (S02U) -Tank,underQround The site has been closed (specif)' date: ) and no waste management activities occurred during 1989. (S03W) Waste Pile DUE DATE: 05. Our company no longer owns or operates a business at this site and NO waste manage- (504S) Surface Impoundment Postmarked No Later Than ment activities occurred under our ownership during 1989. MARCH 1, 1990 

## 06. Other (Include a cover letler detailing your basle for exemption from reporling.) (8050) Other

12. CERTIFICATION I cerllty under penelty

## 0' ,aw'hat I havepMaona'ly examined andamfamiliar withtha InformatiOn aubmilted in',hiaanda/l attached documenta. and'hat ba.ed on my inquiry ot 'hose indlviduela immediately responalb/e for ob'eininl1 'he information. Ibelle VB fllatthe aubmitted Informalion iatrue. ecclHate. andcomplete. lem eware 'hat there areaignil/can' penaltiea for aubmitting fa'aeinformation. including 'hepoaaibllityoffineandimpriaonment.

, 

# I Page I of 

# I

PRINT OR TYPE NAME SIGNATURE DATE _D

. -- 

## ...**~-** 

# . 

# o 0 

# o

# • - - --------- ---- 

# • •

1989 

## TSD FACILITY ANNUAL DANGEROUS WASTE REPORT 1989 Form 

## 5
13. YOUR EPA/STATE HAZARDOUS WASTE 14. GENERATOR'S EPA/STATE 1.0. NUMBER NAME: IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1.0. HUMBER ADDRESS: 

# MJJIIIIlJJ] 

# = CITY: STATE: 

# OJ ZIP:

# CIIII:'IDIIJ
15. WASTE IDENTIFICA liON c. D. E. K. S Phy'" Chemical G. H. I.Wnt.

### ~c L SIal. HandUng

..._ Dangerous J. A. B. I Nata

.. Deolg

.... A_

....I I S=Solld F. _Contalnm.nt W

.... 10 N Menlt ••t D.I. a L=L1q"ld 0=01&_ Waste Description (see Instructiona) y...., Numba' tIon ot ,d Docum.nl Shlpm.nt I I-Inorpnit O-DW E Q-Sludg• i

...-In.lnlc:tIon.) (

... In.lructlon., W,.t. 

## •• Numba, Aac.lyad 

## .. E-EHW 

### • 

## • M·Compr

....d Gal !--I--j 

# . ..j-.++- rl- II

- .. 1..

# ++-

--- 

### ----------- I I I I I

,-- I



### -- I I I I I I I I 

### 1-

# f--++-+- I , 

# -+-+ : I I I 

# 1--++-- -+H- I I.' 

### ,--_._---_. 

# -+++- +++--+--1-+'" -+4--+-

- I I I I I I 

# 1++_ +-1+ I I
I I I I I I I 

### 1-1-

## --1++ I I I

--- -- ._-_. --- ... _ ...... . . 

# _

..-. -_._ ...**~.** 

## +--t

# + -l--j-f- 

## --1-+-1· --I-t·j-

._

.._-- --- .

### _ ......
__ .. .- 

### -.-.... ",-_ .. ..... -.... .. -- ..

## _ ....... - ••• w

__ • 

# -/

..++ --+-+---1- +++ I I I f-- ..- -------- _..

## __._--f------------ ------.-. -- 

## +++- 

# 1-+-+-+--+-1---+' '-H-I- 

### --._---- 

### _._-- -_._._-- ._-_._--- - -_.- ._......_--. . ---- ._.- -

# _ ... _-.-._-'- 

### ._--- 

## t I I I I I



### -- e----- ------**-~** _.,---_. r---
... ---- ...- . --_..

## _ ..

## _- -----_._-- .----

# -_

.._--
.., f 

### l- I \ 

### 1--\ --I 

### ,.\ -j-l-I--

I I I I I I I I I I I

-- -_._-- ----._--+._-_
..__ .__ ....._--- --- 

# I I 

### II 

# ++\-- 

# -+ I I 

## +-1 -j ._--- 

## +--H--- 

## -+-H-

# H-'I--+-' -! 

# ++ 16. COMMENTS (Enter information by section and/or line number-see instructions).



### I PAllA nl

'"'' 

## ... ," n., '"'''' I" ,.,., - 

### -_._--**------~** . -- .---- ._...... .--- .. ".'

## GLOSSARY Acutely hazardous waste: A small subset of dangerous waste originated by USEPA under RCRA. A waste is determined to be "acutely hazardous waste" if it is defined as such under WAC 

### 173-3034W. Acutely hazardous wastes are: discarded chemical products (WAC 173-303-9903) that are identified with a dangerous waste number beginning with a "P" or that show an "X"or "A" in the reason for designation column, or waste numbers F020, F021, F022; F023, F026, or F027. Dangerous waste: Materials that first meet the definition of a solid waste under WAC 173-303-016that are designated as.dangerous waste using the procedures described under WAC 173-303-070. Dangerous waste regulations: Chapter 173-303 of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC). EPA/State site identification number (ID#): 

### Site-specific identifier:assigned by Ecology and USEPA to each dangerous waste generator, transporter, and treatment/storage/disposal (fSD) facility. Extremely hazardous waste (EIIW): 

### A subset of dangerous waste originally created by Ecology to define wastes that are extremely hazardous because of "persistence, bioconcentration or genetic effects, extreme toxicity, or because such quantities present an extreme hazard to man or wildlife". A waste is designated as EHW under each section of the designation procedures ,WAC 173-303-080 through -103. Generator: Any person, by site, whose act or process produces dangerous waste or whose act first causes a dangerous waste to be subject to regulation. 

# G'

"



# C Household hazardous waste: Any substance, regardless of quantity, which is used or generated by the household that exhibits characteristics of ignitibility, corrosivity, reactivity, or toxicity, as defined in the Dangerous Waste Regulations. Large quantity generator (LQG)::GeneratOr or accumulator ofmore than 2,200 pounds of dangerous waste or 2.2 pounds of acutely hazardous waste. Medium quantity generator (MQG): Generator or accumulator ofmore than 220, but less than 2,200 pounds of dangerous waste. This corresponds to the Federal definition of small quantity generators.

,On-site management facility: A facility that manages its own dangerous waste under interim status or a RCRA treatment/storage/disposal permit. Permit-by-rule: A provision of the Dangerous Waste Regulations which states that a facility .or activity is deemed to have the equivalent of a management permit if it meets the requirements of the provisions of WAC 173-303-802. ' Quantity exclusion limit (QEL): A specific quantity ofwaste generated per month or batch for each dangerous waste which determines if a generator is subject only to the small quantity generator (SQG) provisions or fully subject to the Dangerous Waste Regulations Radioactive mixed waste: Designated dangerous waste which'also contains levels of radioactivity. RCRA: The Federal law governing hazardous waste -- Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 

# 0 1976.



### 42

# •

•

• RCRA waste: Wastes regulated in 

### Washington that are hazardous under 40 CFR Part 261.
Recurrent waste: The generation ofdangerous waste from continuous or frequently occurring processes or events, such as industrial production processes. Treatment/storage/disposal facility (TSD): Treatment, storage, and/or storage facility having either interim status or permitted status under 40 CFR Part 261. Wastewater: Dangerous waste, usually mixed with large volumes of water, that is treated and rendered non-dangerous prior to discharge .