alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4647 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4647

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 22, 2005

                                Received

                            January 27, 2006

       Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the USA PATRIOT ACT to extend the sunset of certain provisions 
                              of such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE USA PATRIOT ACT.

    Section 224(a) of the Uniting and Strengthening America by 
Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct 
Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001 (Public Law 107-56; 115 Stat. 
295) is amended by striking ``December 31, 2005'' and inserting 
``February 3, 2006''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 22, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Johnson v. State

2016 MT 293N

DA 15-0610

11/15/16

Affirmed

Dist. 4 (Missoula)
No. 11-5408.

#### Joseph L. Overton, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1063, 132 S. Ct. 757,

181 L. Ed. 2d 489,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8580.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

*490Same case below, 419 Fed. Appx. 173.
No. 10-11038.

#### Kevin E. Burns, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Revenue of Minnesota.

565 U.S. 1177, 132 S. Ct. 1141,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1017,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1049.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Minnesota denied.

Same case below, 787 N.W.2d 164.
No. 11-764.

#### Thomas D. King, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1159, 132 S. Ct. 1128,

181 L. Ed. 2d 981,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 872.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 364 Fed. Appx. 568.
No. 11-5241.

#### Samuel Lowery, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1159, 132 S. Ct. 1090,

181 L. Ed. 2d 982,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 708.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 3 A.3d 1169.
#### Mrs. M. C. Smith, *Appellant,*v. R. L. Waldron, *Appellee.*

En Banc.

Decision Filed Jan. 14, 1926.

*Seymour (& Collins,*for Appellant.

*Farrington & Lockharte,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

— As the bill herein praying for specific performance of an alleged contract to sell “5 acres of land at ..................Pompano less one lot” shows that the alleged written contract describes no land, was not signed by the owner of the land, or by anyone for her, and that the complainant was not put into possession, the demurrer to the bill of complaint should have been sustained.

*39Reversed.

Brown, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
No. 11-7596.

#### Mark McCreary, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1149, 132 S. Ct. 1063,

181 L. Ed. 2d 793,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 432.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 425 Fed. Appx. 77.
No. 11-641.

#### Salvador Rosales, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1115, 132 S. Ct. 1046,

181 L. Ed. 2d 741,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 272.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 647 F.3d 634.
Dolan Chemical Laboratory

4001 Bixby Road

Groveport, OH 43125

T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221

F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168

http://aepenv/labs

Water Analysis

Form REP-703

Rev. 1, 11/2013

Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 3/31/2014

Sample Number: 140928-001 Date Collected: 03/18/2014 08:30 Date Received: 3/18/2014

Clearwater Pond at Weir 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 46.5 ng/L 2 0.8 TLT 03/26/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 140928-002 Date Collected: 03/18/2014 08:35 Date Received: 3/18/2014

Recirculation Pond Outlet at Weir 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 1 ng/L J 2 0.8 TLT 03/26/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 140928-003 Date Collected: 03/18/2014 08:35 Date Received: 3/18/2014

FGD Landfill Discharge to Pond 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 389 ng/L 50 20 TLT 03/26/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 140928-004 Date Collected: 03/18/2014 08:59 Date Received: 3/18/2014

WWTP Outlet 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 543 ng/L 50 20 TLT 03/26/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 140928-005 Date Collected: 03/18/2014 08:54 Date Received: 3/18/2014

Secondary Clarifier Outlet B 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 505 ng/L 20 8 TLT 03/26/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 140928-006 Date Collected: 03/18/2014 08:53 Date Received: 3/18/2014

Secondary Clarifier Outlet A 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 538 ng/L 20 8 TLT 03/26/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 140928-007 Date Collected: 03/18/2014 09:01 Date Received: 3/18/2014

Primary Clarifier Outlet B 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 3240 ng/L 50 20 TLT 03/26/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Amos Plant, 140928 Page 1 of 2
Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 3/31/2014

Sample Number: 140928-008 Date Collected: 03/18/2014 09:04 Date Received: 3/18/2014

WWTP Inlet 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 303000 ng/L 10000 4000 TLT 03/26/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN 

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, 

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit

J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II

Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224

Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Amos Plant, 140928 Page 2 of 2
No. 09-8727.

#### Rex A. Deitz, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 984, 130 S. Ct. 1720,

176 L. Ed. 2d 201,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1948.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 577 F.3d 672.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9436-9437]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4410]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION


Fee Rate

AGENCY: National Indian Gaming Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to 25 CFR 514.1(a)(3), that 
the National Indian Gaming Commission has adopted preliminary annual 
fee rates of 0.00% for tier 1 and 0.058% (.00058) for tier 2 for 
calendar year 2009. These rates shall apply to all assessable gross 
revenues from each gaming operation under the jurisdiction of the 
Commission. If a tribe has a certificate of self regulation under 25 
CFR part 518, the preliminary fee rate on class II revenues for 
calendar year 2009 shall be one-half of the annual fee rate, which is 
0.0290% (.000290).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kwame Mainoo, National Indian Gaming 
Commission, 1441 L Street, NW., Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005; 
telephone (202) 632-7003; fax (202) 632-7066 (these are not toll-free 
numbers).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) 
established the National Indian Gaming Commission which is charged 
with, among other things, regulating gaming on Indian lands.
    The regulations of the Commission (25 CFR part 514), as amended, 
provide for a system of fee assessment and payment that is self-
administered by gaming operations. Pursuant to those regulations, the 
Commission is required to adopt and communicate assessment rates; the 
gaming operations are required to apply those rates to their revenues, 
compute the fees to be paid,

[[Page 9437]]

report the revenues, and remit the fees to the Commission on a 
quarterly basis.
    The regulations of the Commission and the preliminary rate being 
adopted today are effective for calendar year 2009. Therefore, all 
gaming operations within the jurisdiction of the Commission are 

required to self administer the provisions of these regulations, and 
report and pay any fees that are due to the Commission by March 31, 
2009.

    Dated: February 24, 2009.
Philip N. Hogen,
Chairman, National Indian Gaming Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-4410 Filed 3-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7565-01-M
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4702 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the time limitation 

for corrections to wage and self-employment income records. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2006 

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate 

the time limitation for corrections to wage and selfemployment income records. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF TIME LIMITATION FOR COR4 RECTIONS TO WAGE AND SELF-EMPLOYMENT 

5 INCOME RECORDS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 205(c)(4) of the Social 

7 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 405(c)(4)) is amended to read 

8 as follows: 

9 ‘‘(4) If it is brought to the Commissioner’s attention 

10 that any entry of wages or self-employment income in the 
2 

•HR 4702 IH 

1 Commissioner’s records is erroneous or that any item of 

2 wages or self-employment income has been omitted from 

3 such records, the Commissioner may correct such entry 

4 or include such omitted item in such records, as the case 

5 may be.’’. 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 205(c) of 

7 such Act (42 U.S.C. 405(c)) is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking subparagraph 

9 (B) and redesignating subparagraphs (C) and (D) 

10 as subparagraphs (B) and (C), respectively; and 

11 (2) by striking paragraphs (5) and (6) and re12 designating paragraphs (7), (8), and (9) as para13 graphs (5), (6), and (7), respectively. 

14 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

15 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with 

16 respect to errors or omissions occurring before, on, or 

17 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
No. 09-8244.

#### Shaun Kareem Burney, Petitioner v. California.

559 U.S. 978, 130 S. Ct. 1702,

176 L. Ed. 2d 192,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2112.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.

Same case below, 47 Cal. 4th 203, 97 Cal. Rptr. 3d 348, 212 P.3d 639.
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
      OFFICER
|PURSUANT TO                                              
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                  
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                   
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002            

I, John P. Thornton, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of NorPac Technologies, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007, and to which this
      certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                              

| | By:    | /s/ John P. Thornton       
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | JOHN P. THORNTON           
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer    
| |        | and Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | November 14, 2007          

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Montana Twenty-Second Judicial District Court. County of Stillwater.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- SCHAWN MICHAEL SCHMITZ, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-14-009

DECISION

On October 1, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a period of ten (10) years, with five (5) years suspended, for the offense of Count I: Criminal Endangerment, a Felony, in violation of §45-5-207, MCA. The Defendant was ordered to pay a fine of $1,500.00 and pay a surcharge in the amount of $85 to the Clerk of District court in Columbus, Stillwater County, Montana. The Defendant received credit for time served in the amount of two (2) days.

On February 5, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant appeared by video conferencing from Connections Corrections in Butte, Montana along with his attorney, Brandon Hartford of the Hartford Law Office, Billings, Montana. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is *19clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

Done in open Court this 5th day of February, 2016.

DATED this 29th day of February, 2016.

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. John Warner, Member.
No. 09-844.

#### Brent E. Wood, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 941, 130 S. Ct. 1562,

176 L. Ed. 2d 116,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1125.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 340 Fed. Appx. 910.
No. 09-8490.

#### Rex T. Harrison, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 958, 130 S. Ct. 1556,

176 L. Ed. 2d 144,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1270.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 585 F.3d 1155.
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/23

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 23 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
No. 09-7175.

#### Kathalina Monacelli, Petitioner v. Edison State College, et al.

559 U.S. 964, 130 S. Ct. 1573,

176 L. Ed. 2d 156,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1075.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 558 U.S. 1120, 130 S. Ct. 1065, 175 L. Ed. 2d 898, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 284.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service 

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Siskiyou Resource Advisory Committee will meet on Thursday, March 5, 2009 to recommend Title II projects for fiscal year 2009 under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self Determination Act of 2000. The meeting will be held at the Grants Pass Interagency Office, 2164 NE. Spalding Avenue, Grants Pass, Oregon, It begins at 9:30 a.m., ends at 4:30 p.m.; the open public comments begin at 11 a.m. and ends at 11:30 a.m. Written comments may be submitted prior to the meeting and delivered to Designated Federal Official, Scott Conroy at the Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest, 3040 Biddle Road, Medford, Oregon 97504. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest Public Affairs Officer Patty Burel at telephone: (541) 618-2113, or cell phone (541) 941-4268, e-mail:                         *pburel@fs.fed.us,*                         or USDA Forest Service, 3040 Biddle Road, Medford, OR, 97504.                     

Dated: February 19, 2009. 

Scott Conroy, 

Forest Supervisor, Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest.

[FR Doc. E9-4013 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Exhibit 4.56


 


AMENDMENT TO EXCLUSIVE TECHNICAL AND CONSULTING
AGREEMENT


 


This amendment agreement (this Amendment)
is entered into by and among the following parties (the Parties) on April 12, 2012 in Beijing.


 


 


Party A: Simlife (Beijing) Science
Co., Ltd.


 


Party B: Xiamen Xinreli Scientific and
Technology Co,Ltd.


 


This Amendment is the supplement to
the exclusive technical and consulting agreement (the Agreement) entered into by Party A and Party B on June 29, 2009. This
Amendment shall be part of the Agreement. If any provision of this Amendment conflicts with any provision of the Agreement,
such provision of this Amendment shall prevail. All provisions of the Agreement not otherwise amended by this Amendment shall
continue to be effective.


 


		1.	The Parties hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:



			(1) Article 6.2 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: “The
term of this Agreement will last until Party A is dissolved according to the PRC laws.”



 


			(2) Article 7.2 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:
                                                                                  “During the term of this Agreement, Party B cannot terminate this Agreement before the schedule time. Notwithstanding
                                                                                  the above mentioned, Party A may terminate this Agreement at any time with a written notice to Party B 30 days before such
                                                                                  termination. If Party A terminate the Agreement in advance duo to Party B's reason, Party B shall take the liability to
                                                                                  compensate all the losses caused thereby to Party A and shall pay the relevant fees for the services provided.”



 


			(3) Article 7.3 of the Agreement shall be deemed to have been deleted from the
                                                                                  Agreement.



 


		2.	This Amendment shall become effective as the date hereof.



		3.	This Amendment shall be kept in 2 copies. Each party shall keep 1 copy and each copy shall have the
same legal effect.



 


Party A: Simlife
(Beijing) Science Co., Ltd.


 


Party
B: Xiamen Xinreli Scientific and Technology Co,Ltd.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4841 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4841

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Ojito Wilderness Act to make a technical correction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OJITO WILDERNESS MAP.

    Section 2(1) of the Ojito Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1132 note; 
Public Law 109-94) is amended by striking ``October 1, 2004'' and 
inserting ``January 24, 2006''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 14, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4841

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend the Ojito Wilderness Act to make a technical correction.
```