alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DENT 

Table IV, Defect No. 208 – Upper limit of a minor defect. A 

moderately deep indentation with moderately acute crimping of the 

end seam.
#### State of Florida *Ex Rel*S. M. Jones, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Henry R. Chase, Sheriff, Dade County, Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

En Banc.

Decision Filed January 23, 1926.

*R. B. 8 clialler m,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*197
      *Rivers Buford,*Attorney General, and J. B. Gaines, Assistant, for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

— This cause- having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the final order herein, remanding the petitioner to custody, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in said final order. It is therefore considered, ordered, and adjudged by the court that the said final order of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Brown, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and'Strum, J. J., concur;

Buford, J., disqualified.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4745 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4745

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 Making supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 2006 for the Small 
    Business Administration's disaster loans program, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the following sums 
are appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise 
appropriated, for fiscal year 2006:

                     Small Business Administration

                     disaster loans program account

                     (including transfer of funds)

    For an additional amount for ``Disaster Loans Program Account'' for 
the cost of direct loans authorized by section 7(b) of the Small 
Business Act, $712,000,000, to remain available until expended: 
Provided, That such costs, including the cost of modifying such loans, 
shall be as defined in section 502 of the Congressional Budget Act of 
1974: Provided further, That the amount provided under this heading is 
hereby derived by transfer from the amount provided for ``Disaster 
Relief'' in Public Law 109-62: Provided further, That the amount 
provided under this heading is designated as an emergency requirement 
pursuant to section 402 of H. Con. Res. 95 (109th Congress), the 
concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2006.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 15, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4745

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 Making supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 2006 for the Small 
    Business Administration's disaster loans program, and for other 
                               purposes.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA

No. 17–1351

Johnson County No. FECR115064

IMPROVIDENT GRANT ORDER

STATE OF IOWA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

vs. 

STEPHON TRAVELL CURRY, 

Defendant-Appellant.

Upon further consideration of this case, the court, McDonald, J., taking no part, 

concludes further review was improvidently granted and, therefore, rescinds the order of 

March 28, 2019, granting further review. 

Copies to:

Brenda Jean Gohr

Assistant Appellate Defender

Fourth Floor Lucas Building

Des Moines, IA 50319

Kevin Cmelik

Israel J. Kodiaga

Assistant Attorneys General

Criminal Appeals Division 

Hoover State Office Building, 2nd Floor

Des Moines, IA 50319–0106
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 18065 STANDARD 17.05 -0.11 -1.40

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

DLA/NAVY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT July 2, 2018

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, VELOUR FLEECE, FR 

POLYESTER/ARAMID PD 01-17

Shade Number BLACK 3238 Piece/Roll Number 18065
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      11,770,176
<SECURITIES>                                 3,118,104
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,694,684
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,252,587
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            30,701,170
<PP&E>                                      55,887,825
<DEPRECIATION>                              34,878,486
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             119,952,567
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,128,606
<BONDS>                                    100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 23,975,000
<COMMON>                                        53,133
<OTHER-SE>                                (28,278,014)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               119,952,567
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            62,340,491
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               60,034,732
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               725,128
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,411,558
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,935,528)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (6,983,885)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,643,060)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,643,060)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 11-35.

#### U.S. Vision, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Debra Johnson.

565 U.S. 1110, 132 S. Ct. 997,

181 L. Ed. 2d 733,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 303.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 415 Fed. Appx. 841.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 9, 2009 

1215 

Order 

 

January 9, 2009 

137338 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137338 

 COA: 285845 

Kalamazoo CC: 94-000719-FC 

GARY THOMAS FRANKLIN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 21, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s 

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). To the extent that the 

defendant’s motion involves a request for DNA testing under MCL 770.16, the defendant 

fails to establish an entitlement to DNA testing because he fails to satisfy the four 

conditions set forth in MCL 770.16(3). 

 HATHAWAY, J., not participating.
No. 11-6714.

#### Robert Anthony Escareno, aka Robert A. Escareno, Petitioner v. Mike Evans, Warden.

565 U.S. 1175, 132 S. Ct. 1139,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1013,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 667.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 1068, 132 S. Ct. 779, 181 L. Ed. 2d 499, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8589.
No. 11-7331.

#### Hilton Silver, Petitioner v. Maryland.

565 U.S. 1128, 132 S. Ct. 1039,

181 L. Ed. 2d 765,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 135.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied.

Same case below, 420 Md. 415, 23 A.3d 867.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          27,324
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,466
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,593
<INVENTORY>                                     41,772
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,333
<PP&E>                                          82,243
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,762
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 152,859
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,623
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,524
<OTHER-SE>                                   (369,585)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   152,859
<SALES>                                        121,121
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               121,121
<CGS>                                           60,644
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    28
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,131
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,847
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,842
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,005
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,005
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 147 (Friday, July 31, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40878]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20501]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List Additions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Additions to the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action adds to the Procurement List services to be 
furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have 
other severe disabilities.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 31, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Crystal Gateway 3, Suite 310, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-4302.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Milkman (703) 603-7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 19, 1998, the Committee for Purchase 
From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published notices (63 FR 
33631) of proposed additions to the Procurement List. After 
consideration of the material presented to it concerning capability of 
qualified nonprofit agencies to provide the services and impact of the 
additions on the current or most recent contractors, the Committee has 
determined that the services listed below are suitable for procurement 
by the Federal Government under 41 U.S.C. 46-48c and 41 CFR 51-2.4.
    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organizations that will furnish the services to the 
Government.
    2. The action will not have a severe economic impact on current 
contractors for the services.
    3. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the services to the Government.
    4. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
48c) in connection with the services proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List.
    Accordingly, the following services are hereby added to the 
Procurement List:

Administrative Services, General Services Administration, Federal 
Protective Service Division, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, 
California
Facilities Services Support, White Sands Missile Range, White Sands, 
New Mexico

    This action does not affect current contracts awarded prior to the 
effective date of this addition or options that may be exercised under 
those contracts.
Beverly L. Milkman,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 98-20501 Filed 7-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
# C_2016034EN.01000201.xml

| 29.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/2

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/119, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/111, concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia

(2016/C 34/03)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/119 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/111 (4) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia.

1

2

3

4

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the abovementioned Annexes should continue to be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia.

---

(1)  OJ L 28, 2.2.2011, p. 62.

1

(2)  OJ L 23, 29.1.2016, p. 65.

2

(3)  OJ L 31, 5.2.2011, p. 1.

3

(4)  OJ L 23, 29.1.2016, p. 1.

4

---
#### State v. Nauman

2016 MT 275N

DA 14-0812

10/25/16

Affirmed

Dist. 11 (Flathead)
No. 09-801.

#### David L. Wescott, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 940, 130 S. Ct. 1546,

176 L. Ed. 2d 116,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1307.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 576 F.3d 347.
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 11


V-TWIN ACQUISITIONS, INC.
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND JULY 31, 1998

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
     --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Three Months
                                                               Ended Sept. 30,        July 31,
                                                                    1998                1998
     -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

<S>                                                             <C>                 <C>      
     Shares Outstanding............................              3,000,000           1,000,000
     Weighted average shares outstanding...........              3,000,000           1,000,000
     Net Income (Loss).............................             $ (10,000)           $  - 0 -
     Total Net Income (Loss) Available for Common Stockholders' $ (10,000)           $  - 0 -
                                                                ==========           =========

     Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
     Earnings (Loss) Per Share                                     $0.00             $0.00
                                                                   -----             -----
</TABLE>
DISMISS and Opinion Filed June 28, 2024 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-24-00244-CV 

PRIMO BAGGIOLINI, Appellant 

V. 

BARBARA ANNE BAGGIOLINI, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court 

Grayson County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. FA-21-1220 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Smith, Miskel, and Breedlove 

Opinion by Justice Miskel 

We questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal because appellant again 

challenges the trial court’s November 21, 2022 divorce decree, the appeal of which 

has been resolved. See Baggiolini v. Baggiolini, No. 05-22-01251-CV, 2023 WL 

2259174, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Feb. 28, 2023, pet. denied) (mem. op.). A party 

cannot appeal the same judgment twice. See Neuse v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, 

No. 13-19-00234-CV, 2019 WL 3331643, at *2 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–

Edinburg July 25, 2019, pet. denied) (mem. op.). Although appellant filed a letter 

brief at our request, nothing therein demonstrates our jurisdiction over this appeal. 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.3(a). 

240244F.P05 

 

/Emily Miskel/

EMILY MISKEL 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

PRIMO BAGGIOLINI, Appellant 

No. 05-24-00244-CV V. 

BARBARA ANNE BAGGIOLINI, 

Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 59th Judicial 

District Court, Grayson County, 

Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. FA-21-1220. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Miskel. 

Justices Smith and Breedlove 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee BARBARA ANNE BAGGIOLINI recover her 

costs of this appeal from appellant PRIMO BAGGIOLINI. 

Judgment entered June 28, 2024
Montana Twentieth Judicial District Court. County of Lake.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- JONATHAN GREEN, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-08-191

DECISION

On January 6, 2016, the Defendant’s suspended sentence was revoked and was sentenced to a three (3) year commitment to the Department of Corrections for the offense of Burglary, a Felony, in violation of §45-6-204, MCA. The Defendant was granted credit for time served of 26 days. The Court recommended that the Defendant be screened for appropriate chemical dependency programs, including NEXUS, if deemed appropriate by the Department of Corrections. The Court further recommended that the relevant *43original conditions previously imposed be re-imposed.

Done in open Court this 5th day of May, 2016.

DATED this 10th day of June, 2016.

On May 5, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Jennifer Streano of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4708 

To increase the refundable amount of the child credit in the case of taxpayers 

who had a primary residence in the Hurricane Katrina disaster area 

on August 28, 2005. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2006 

Mr. RANGEL (for himself, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. EMANUEL, 

and Mr. MELANCON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To increase the refundable amount of the child credit in 

the case of taxpayers who had a primary residence in 

the Hurricane Katrina disaster area on August 28, 2005. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Relief for Working 

5 Family Victims of Hurricane Katrina Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WORKING FAMILY TAX RELIEF FOR HURRICANE 

7 KATRINA DISASTER AREA RESIDENTS. 

8 For purposes of section 24(d) of the Internal Revenue 

9 Code of 1986 (relating to portion of child tax credit made 
2 

•HR 4708 IH 

1 refundable), in the case of any taxable year beginning dur2 ing 2006 or 2007, with respect to any taxpayer who had 

3 a primary residence in the Hurricane Katrina disaster 

4 area (as defined in section 1400M(2) of such Code) on 

5 August 28, 2005, clause (i) of section 24(d)(1)(B) of such 

6 Code shall be applied by substituting 10 percent of the 

7 taxpayer’s earned income for such taxable year for the 

8 amount which would otherwise be determined under such 

9 clause for such taxable year. A taxpayer may elect not to 

10 have this section apply for any taxable year. 

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 37 (Thursday, February 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 8783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4096]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Meeting of the Board of Visitors of Marine Corps 
University

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board of Visitors of the Marine Corps University (BOV MCU) 
will meet the Marine Corps University Foundation members to create a 
working relationship in order to further the growth of the Marine Corps 
University. All sessions of the meeting will be open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Friday, March 20, 2009, from 9 a.m. 
to 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Sheraton Premier Hotel. The 
address is: 8661 Leesburg Pike at Tyson's Corner, Vienna, VA 22182.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Davi Michelle Richardson, Faculty 
Development Coordinator, Marine Corps University Board of Visitors, 
2076 South Street, Quantico, Virginia 22134, telephone number: 703-784-
2884.

    Dated: February 18, 2009.
A.M. Vallandingham,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-4096 Filed 2-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P