•

WASHINGTON STATE

DEPARTMENT OF

E COL 0 GY

•

Washington State

1989 Hazardous Waste

Annual Report Summary

September 1992

Publication 92-89

printed on recycled paper
•

•

•

Washington State

1989 Hazardous Waste

Annual Report Summary

Prepared by the Washington State Department of Ecology

Hazardous Waste Information and Planning Section

September 1992

printedon recycled paper
•

•

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF TABLES ii

LIST OF FIGURES iii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY v

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Organization of the 1989 Annual Report Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1

1.2 Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1

1.3 Information Quality and Methodology of Data Review 3

1.4 Dangerous Waste Designation Process 4

CHAPTER 2. DANGEROUS WASTE GENERATION

2.1 Number of Reports by Generator Category, 1987-1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 7

2.2 Number of Generating Sites by Industry Group, 1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 10

2.3 Generators Filing Annual Reports by County, 1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 12

2.4 Overall Trends in Waste Generation, 1987-89 14

2.5 Recurrent Waste Generation, 1987-89 16

2.6 RCRA vs. State-only Recurrent Waste, 1987-89 : . . . . .. 18

2.7 Recurrent Waste Generated by Industry Group, 1989 , 20

2.8 Top 25 Recurrent Waste Generators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 22

2.9 Recurrent Waste Generation by County, 1989 24

2.10 Recurrent Waste Recycled On-site by County, 1989 26

2.11 Permit-by-rule Waste Generation by County, 1989 30

CHAPTER 3. DANGEROUS WASTE MANAGEMENT

3.1 1989 Washington Management Facility Demographics 34

3.2 Waste Management Methods at Washington Facilities, 1989 . . . . . . . . . .. 36

3.3 On-site Management of Dangerous Waste, 1989 38

3.4 Washington Dangerous Waste Imports, 1989 40

3.5 Washington Dangerous Waste Exports, 1989 42

3.6 Net Flows of Dangerous Waste, 1989 44

APPENDIX A. DATA TABLES

A-I Recurrent Waste Generated by County, 1988-1989

A-2 Net Flows of Dangerous Waste, 1989 (Tons)

APPENDIX B. USEPA AND WASHINGTON STATE-QNLY WASTE CODES

APPENDIX C. FORM EXAMPLES

Form 4

Form 5

• GLOSSARY

i
TABLE

LIST OF TABLES

TITLE PAGE

o

i

II

I

i'

I '

I

i

A

B

c

D

E

F

G

H

I

A-I

A-2

Number of Generating Sites by Industry Group, 1989 .

Overall Trends in Waste Generation, 1987-89 Tonnages .

Recurrent Waste Generated by Industry Group, 1989 .

Top 25 Recurrent Waste Generators, 1989 .

Recurrent Waste Recycled On-site by County in 1989 .

Wastewater Generated under Permit-by-rule by Industry Group .

Top 15 Permit-by-rule Waste Generators .

Washington Commercial Management Facilities, 1989 .

Waste Management Methods at Washington Facilities, 1989 Tonnages

Recurrent Waste Generated by County, 1988-1989

Net Flows of Dangerous Waste, 1989 (Tons)

ii

11

14

21

23

29

32

33

35

36

0

o
LIST OF FIGURES

TITLE PAGE

•

Waste Designation Flowchart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 5

Annual Reporters by Generator Category, 1987-89 9

Generators Filing Annual Reports by County, 1989 " 13

Overall Trends in Waste Generation, 1987-89 : '.' .. 15

Recurrent Waste Generation, 1987-89 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 17

RCRA vs. State-only Recurrent Waste, 1987-89· " 19

Recurrent Waste Generation by County, 1989 . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 25

Recurrent Waste Recycled On-site by County, 1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 27

Permit-by-rule Waste Generation by County, 1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 31

Waste Management Methods at Washington Facilities, 1989 . . . . . . . .. 37

On-site Management of Dangerous Waste, 1989 39

Washington Dangerous Waste Imports, 1987~1989 . " . . . . . . . . . . .. 40

Washington Dangerous Waste Imports, 1989· '.' . . . .. 41

Washington Dangerous Waste Exports, 1987-1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 42

Washington Dangerous Waste Exports, 1989 43

Net Flows of Dangerous Waste, 1989 45

iii
•

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The 1989 edition of Washington's Annual Dangerous Waste Report Summary

describes the continuing expansion of dangerous waste generation and management.

Substantial growth in: 1) the number of generating sites; 2) the tonnage of dangerous waste

generated; and 3) the amount of waste managed are found in the accompanying data analyses.

Nearly 3,800 Washington sites filed Annual Reports in 1989. This presents an

increase of more than 10 percent over comparable 1988 figures. Better than 20 percent, or

790, of those reporting were categorized as large quantity generators (LQG's). Greater than

fifty percent of the LQG's were sites involved in lumber, wood products, and printing;

primary and fabricated metals; equipment manufacturing; and transportation and utilities. The

vast majority of these sites were located in urban areas such as King, Pierce, Spokane, and

Snohomish Counties.

In 1989, recurrent waste generated increased by thirty percent over 1988's level to

278.428 tons. This generation was nearly equally split between Federal and state-only

regulated wastes. Eighty-five percent ofthe recurrent waste was reported by those industries

closely associated with LQG's. The U.S. Department of Energy's Hanford Reservation was

Washington's largest generator of this waste type with 31,995 tons. The largest share, thirtyfive percent, of all recurrent waste originated in King County. Recurrent waste recycled onsite was identified for the first time in 1989. However, only slightly more than 2,000 tons --

less than one percent -- were reported.

Annual reports also contained data on radioactive mixed waste and permit-by-rule

(PBR) wastewaters. The 32,998 tons of radioactive mixed waste were exclusively reported by

the Hanford facility - a decrease of 80 percent from 1988's figures. In contrast, PBR waste

more than doubled to 4,536,866 tons between 1988 and 1989. This dramatic growth was

largely due to the identification of 2,600,000 tons of wastewater generated by Shell Oil's

Skagit County refinery.

These same wastewaters contributed to a greater than 100 percent increase in

dangerous waste managed in Washington during 1989. In excess of 4,700,000 million tons

were managed on-site with ninety-eight percent consisting of PBR. Only 92,069 tons of

"non-wastewaters" were treated, stored, or disposed on-site according to 1989 Form.5's.

Waste imported to Washington management facilities escalated by forty percent over

1988's figures. More than sixty percent of the 18,783 tons imported originated in Oregon.

At the same time, exports of Washington generated waste declined fifteen percent in 1989.

Once again, the vast majority - seventy-three percent - was destined for management and

eventual disposal in Oregon.

v
:.

I

,

I

•

C~l. ~ODUCTION

1.1 OrganiZation of the 1989 Annual Report StlIJlDla[y

Chapter 1 of Ecology's 1989 Annual Report Summary begins with a brief overview of how

waste generation and management data is collected, reviewed, and analyzed for the purposes of this

document.

Chapter 2 entails an exhaustive review of Washington's dangerous waste generators and

includes: 1) a census of the current population; 2) classification of Annual Reports by generator

category; 3) distributions by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code and county location; and 4)

comparison to prior years' data collected under a similar regulatory climate. This is followed by

detailed reviews of waste categories - recurrent, permit-by-rule, non-recurrent, and radioactive

mixed. Historical trends, geographic distribution, and detailed analysis of "who generated how much

of what" waste stream follow.

Chapter 3 inspects the waste management side of Washington's "cradle-to-grave" waste

tracking algorithm. Distinctions are made between on-site, off-site (but still within Washington), and

export as management options. Regulated waste imported to the state's management industry are also

assessed at this point. ' The chapter then concludes with a look at the net flows of dangerous waste to

and from Washington. This data substantiates the state's continued position among the largest

exporters of its hazardous waste in the nation.

In addition, a complete list of Federal and State dangerous waste numbers used in 1989 is

found following Chapter 3. Samples of the 1989 survey instruments have also been provided.

Finally, an updated glossary of regulatory jargon and nomenclature concludes this document.

Attempts to maximize the consistency of data comparisons between reporting years have

limited this Summary's historical perspective to the period between 1987 and 1989. Although

Ecology has collected waste generation and management information since 1982, changing regulations

have established 1987 as the break point for comparable data.

1.2 Objectives

Throughout the eight year span of its publication, the Annual Report Summary has provided a

state-wide analysis of dangerous waste generation and management data. Its purpose is to provide an

overview to state and local governments, the affected business community, and concerned citizens of

Washington. While not intended to supply every detail on each-waste stream generated or managed

by all members of the regulated community, this Summary can answer the following questions.

How much dangerous waste was generated in 1989 and how does this

compare to recent years?

Who generates the vast majority of Washington's recurrent waste streams?

Where are these generators located?

What types of waste are generated?

How are the wastes managed?

1
•

1.3 Infonnation Quality and Methodology of Data Review

The informational bases for this Summary are Ecology's Form 4, "Generator Annual

Dangerous Waste Report", and Form 5, "TSD Annual Dangerous Waste Report". One, or both, of

these reports are required by WAC 173-303-060 from every location having an active EPA/State site

identification number (EPA ID#) during the calendar year. The Form 4 provides the following types

of information: 1) a broad-based profile of the site including EPA ID#, name, location, SIC code,

and regulatory status; and 2) manifest-specific waste identification data consisting of waste

description, dangerous waste number(s), quantities, and identification of the transport and

management contractors employed in handling the waste stream. Form 5 is completed by in-state

treatment/storage/disposal facilities and immediate, or "24-hour", recyclers. Both forms provide for a

check and balance between generator shipments and facility receipts. All completed forms are

required to be postmarked by March 1 following the reporting year.

When received by Ecology, the submitted report is subject to a rigorous series of hand and

automated review procedures. Each and every 1989 report received thorough review for compliance

with the state's Dangerous Waste Regulations as well as for technical accuracy. Ecology staff make

extensive use of existing records -- crosschecking back through previous years' generation -- as well

as comparing with receiving facility records. Thousands of telephone calls are made and hundreds of

letters written in order to verify or complete questionable or missing data. When necessary, regional

compliance inspectors are contacted for information only their experience can provide.

Passage through this initial round of scrutiny moves the report toward automation. Double

keypunching of all data minimizes the potential for error during this critical step. An audit trail or

verification takes place so as to match up raw information with the now-automated data. At this

point, the data are ready to undergo further analysis as each piece finds its place in the state-wide

puzzle. Only when the picture has been pieced together does this Annual Report Summary make its

appearance. By that time, the data have been subjected to a minimum of five separate hand reviews,

a battery of automated edits, and more than twenty computer analyses.

Following review, annual report information serves as the basis for decision making

throughout the Solid and Hazardous Waste (S&HW) Program. Planners find the data essential to

projecting the State's future generation and need for management capacity as well as meeting Federal

requirements such as Capacity Assurance Planning (CAP). Day to day S&HW Program operations

such as regulatory development efforts and enforcement actions .are dependent upon these data. Other

Ecology programs use this high quality information, e.g., Waste Reduction, Recycling" and Litter

Control (WRRLC) Program's assessment of hazardous waste generator fees to fund technical

assistance promoting waste minimization.

3
~)

1.4 Dangerous Waste Designation Process

According to regulation, dangerous waste includes those solids, liquids, gases, or mixtures

whose properties could put human health, property, or the environment at risk. The process of

determining whether or not a material meets the definition of dangerous waste and requires proper

management is referred to as designation.

Figure 1 portrays the basic steps of the designation process. (Details regarding designation

are found in WAC 173-303-070 through -104 while an abridged discussion has been incorporated into

Ecology's Guide for Hazardous Waste Generators.) The designation process can be boiled down to

the following four steps:

1) lists;

2) characteristics;

3) mixtures; and

4) criteria.

Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulations (40 CFR Part 261) define both

lists and characteristics. Lists include; 1) "Discarded Chemical Products"; 2) "Non-specific Sources";

and 3) "Specific Sources". Characteristics are wide-ranging traits of dangerous waste specifically

defined in the regulations and include ignitibility, corrosivity, reactivity, and toxicity.

In addition, Washington has broadened the range of dangerous waste by regulating materials

not captured by RCRA. These are referred to as mixtures and criteria -- toxic, persistent, and

carcinogenic - waste. State regulations require generators possessing "special knowledge" regarding 0

the composition of their waste - or those specifically required by Ecology -- to complete designation

through these steps.

o

4
Waste 01'" I::nown

COf11=l0sltion

No

Listed DIscarded

Chemical Product?

No

Listed Dangerous

Waste Source?

es

Also a Dangerous

Woste "'" xture?

lIE 0'" I ter ra?

lIE Toxic?

lIE Pers Istem?

:lIE carCinogenIc?

No es or !'b

Waste Is I>bt

Regulated by

Ecology

No

Dangerous waste

Mlxtlre?

lIE Toxic?

lIE Persistent?

lIE care I nocen I c?

No

CharacteristIc

DanQerous Waste?

lIE Ignitable?

lIE corrosIve?

lIE React I ve?

lIE EP ToxIcity

es

CharacterIstIc

Dangerous Waste? *

Ignitable? *

Corrosive?

lIE Reactive? *

EP ToxIcIty

;(es or !'b

waste Is

RegUlated by

Ecology

•

Figure 1. Waste Designation Flowchart
•

•

•

CHAPTER 2. DANGEROUS WASTE GENERATION

The "cradle-to-grave" waste tracking system implemented by Ecology matches' waste

generated by thousands of sites across the state with the waste received by dozens of

treatment/storage/disposal facilities and immediate recyclers. This portion of the 1989 Summary

focuses its attention upon the generators' side of the equation. Initially, the demographics --

population, categorization by scale of generation, business type, and geographic distribution -- are

evaluated. Some historical perspective is gained through the comparison and contrast of these

indicators with like data from 1987 and 1988. This is followed by detailed analysis of waste

categories: recurrent, permit-by-rule, non-recurrent, and radioactive mixed.

2.1 Number of Reports by Generator Category, 1987-1989

Within a system as dynamic as that tracking Washington generators, several points of

confusion exist regarding who's who and what's what. Subtle differences in language used while

posing identical sounding questions may result in remarkably different answers. These can be found

during the straightforward process of conducting a census of the regulated community. Populations of

handlers should correlate closely.with notifierlists.· However, notifiers and annual reporters may

have significant variation as not all nctifiers comply with regulations to submit annual reports. And,

just how does the term generator -- much less small, medium, or large quantity generator -- fit in?

Figure 2 begins to explain the differences between some of these labels. For the 1989 Annual

Report cycle, Form 4's were received from 3,798 handlers or notifiers. This is an increase of nearly

ten percent over comparable figures from 1988. While this overall growth might be termed fairly

modest, changes within the specific groupings are significantly greater. Large quantity generators

(LQG's) -- those sites exceeding 2,200 pounds of dangerous waste (or 2.2 pounds of acutely

hazardous waste) generated or accumulated during a single calendar month -- grew by more than

twelve percent. The eighty-six' new members of this classification make up a significant additional

workload for compliance inspectors.

Percentage growth between 1988 and 1989 increases as the scale of waste generation

decreases, i.e., more smaller generators have recently entered the regulated community -- to a point.

More than two hundred new medium quantity generators (MQG's) -- generators or accumulators of

greater than 220, but less than 2,200, pounds of dangerous waste -- reported in 1989.

The number of small quantity generators (SQG's) -- those reporting generation or

accumulation of less than 220 pounds of dangerous waste or 2.2 pounds of acutely hazardous waste --

has grown by more than seventy percent. However, a significant proportion of these "new"

generators have likely moved out of the remaining category, that of non-generators. This group

includes: 1) those sites completing their record keeping requirements for EPA ID#'s withdrawn or

canceled during 1988 or 1989; 2) sites generating only exempt waste, e.g., used motor oil or

polychlorinated biphenyl" (PCB) filled transformers or capacitors; 3) those handlers having an active

EPA ID# solely for the purpose of transporting dangerous waste; and 4) those sites not generating or

accumulating any dangerous waste during 1989. Much effort has also been expended to remove those

sites having active EPA ID#'s without the documentation of any activity for several years.

7
Conclusions to be drawn from Figure 2 include : .

1) the total number of annual reporters grew by nearly one thousand sites or 33%

between 1987 and 1989; .

2) large quantity generators increased by 160 or 25% during this same time period;

3) Washington's medium quantity generator category rose by more than five hundred

or 61% since 1987; and

4) while small quantity generators reporting dropped by 47%, those sites reporting no

generation increased by 55% through 1989.

8

c

o

o
• • •

Figure 2

Annual Reporters by Generator Category, 1987-89 4~OOO .... : -------------------------.

3,000

rn

t

i 2,000

e,

1,000

Year 1987-- 1988- .- 1989 _.

Non-gen :;:;:::::::::::::

:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: 894 1,462 1,395

SQG {~f:1l~l~~~~ 465 143 247

MQG ..,",.: ,.-' 843 1,158 1,366

LQG

- 628 704 790

Washington 2,830 3,467 3,798
A second pattern displayed by the regulated community is that seen by using Standard

Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes. The Classification consists of a hierarchical structure beginning

with divisions, running through majorgroups and industry groups, and ending up with industry codes.

2.2 Number of Generating Sites by Industry Group, 1989 c

Double-digit SIC Codes define the

major group to which a particular establishment

belongs. Examples include primary metal

industries (33) or electric, gas, and sanitary

services (49). Addition of the third digit

specifies an industry group such as the primary

smelting and refining of nonferrous metals

(333). At its greatest level of detail, the fourdigit SIC Code represents a particular industry

code such as primary production of aluminum

(3334).

Table A provides the classification of

1989 Annual Reporters by industry group (or

. three-digit SIC Code). Not surprisingly, the distribution is fairly representative of the more

prominent sectors of the Washington economy. Tertiary sector industry groups such as business

services, wholesale and retail trade, and transportation and utilities are prominently represented.

Roughly sixty percent of all reporters fall into these groups. Also quite visible are the manufacturing

groups for which Washington is best known equipment manufacturing, lumber and wood products,

and primary and fabricated metals. This is especially true in the evaluation of large quantity

generators. Better than forty percent of Washington's 790 LQG's during 1989 fell into these three

industry groups.

10

o

o
f,

I'

f

•

•

•

TABLE A

NUMBER OF GENERATING SITES BY INDUSTRY GROUP, 1989

INDUSTRY GROUP NON-GEN SQG MQG LQG TOTAL %

Agriculture, forestry, fishing (011-(97) 31 2 12 6 51 1.3

Mining (101-149) 3 0 3 0 6 0.2

Construction (152-179) 60 3 53 33 149 3.9

Food and clothing (201-239) 12 0 27 7 46 1.2

~1~1~_~II.!_:III\\lIi_[I[\\1 ~\!l:~[!:i[:l![!~1!l!:[[![I!::~1!~ll!' lill:i:!lli!ll:!::!,!il iiii:l!i:il!illl::ll l!l~ilii:!i~!ili:i[ ~!~:i:ii!ii:i:!iiii::[:i_\ii l\i\:::j~i::::i:!\ii\

Chemicals and petroleum (281-299) 62 4 23 51 140 3.7

Rubber, plastic, leather, stone (301-329) 17 4 13 32 66 1.7

:!ili_lltlil_i_;iilillljll~ljl:~lii !l~~j:iiijl~illjlllii:ijlj:ililljljl ,l~::li\\l:jjjilillj!: \i\\\i\:\I\I\I~I::\lji:' ,1~llll~ll~!i\i:II::I\ :!l!i:l~\~::\:l~l:l!iijll~::\ 1\1~1~11;1\~~I\;lll

:!*__::.\liiBi~it11\l!lir~~~i!!iii!:i!!:!~liiiiiijil:iiil!i!!!li!li!:'i!!!j:::!!iiliiii lj!ii:iiijl!iJ.lf~i: ':~iiijlj::i~jji.il:~: iljljl:ii~i[jj:ji!iilj::IBili: ilim'ijl~:llll\:

Transportation and utilities (401-497) 294 18 48 78 438 11.5

Wholesale and retail trade (501-599) 268 18 265 67 618 16.3

Finance, insurance, real estate (601-679) 23 1 13 9 46 1.2

Business services (701-799) 212 96 456 64 828 21.8

Human services (801-899) 122 2S 89 40 276 7.3

Public administration (911-972) 147 47 97 68 359 9.5

TOTAL 1,395 247 1,366 790 3,798 00.0

PERCENTAGE 36.7 6.5 36.0 20.8 100.0
Figure 3 presents the geographic distribution of the 1989 regulated community. As in past

years, prominent spatial concentrations are found throughout the east side of the Puget Sound Basin.

Centered on Seattle and King County, annual reporters are found in direct correlation with the state's

population distribution. Decreasing urban densities - associated with increased distance from the

Seattle-Tacoma-Everett metropolitan area -- are seen to have fewer annual reporters. Similar peaks

explained this same way are found in Spokane and Clark Counties. While Spokane literally stands

isolated, Clark displays the affect of an interstate "spillover" connected to the growth of Portland,

Oregon.

2.3 Generators Filing Annual Reports by County, 1989 c

Three additional counties - Cowlitz, Whatcom, and Yakima -- exhibit secondary

concentrations of annual reporters in 1989. Cowlitz can be explained as a meld of further removal

from Portland's market dominance in combination with its own historical development as an industrial

center in wood products and aluminum smelting. In contrast, Yakima contains the primary service

center for central Washington with little, if any, competition until Spokane's influence is felt from the

east. Lastly, Whateom's prominence may be primarily attributed to its proximity to Vancouver -

Canada's major West Coast metropolis. However, its very position astride the international boundary .

enhances Whateom's development as well. Differences in labor costs, access to raw materials, and

brokering of imports and exports can all contribute to the explanation of this area's continued growth.

12

o

o
• - --~------------- --~- -- - - - --- -- - -

• •

Figure 3

Generators Filing Annual Reports by County, 1989

I

<10

Generators

lij:i:::i:!:::jI:i:i:j:i!iIl.~i::!i:!II

11-40 41-100

->100
2.4 Overall Trends in Waste Generation, 1987-89

Figure 4 illustrates the trends in amounts of dangerous waste reported by generators between

1987 and 1989. While providing a three-year picture of total generation, the data is also

disaggregated by waste type. Four primary waste types have been defined and analyzed by Ecology:

1) recurrent waste derived from a generator's on-going production process;

2) permit-by-rule (PBR) wastewaters discharged under National·Pollution Discharge

Elimination System (NPDES), state water quality, or local discharge permits that

designate as dangerous waste prior to on-site treatment by the generator;

3) non-recurrent waste such as demolition or clean-up debris, contaminated soils, or

spill materials that are accidentally or infrequently generated; and

4) radioactive mixed waste streams originate almost strictly from the United States

Department of Energy's Hanford Nuclear Reservation and consist of designated

. dangerous waste exhibiting low level radioactivity. (High-level nuclear waste is

regulated by Ecology's Nuclear and Mixed Waste Program and falls outside the scope

of this Summary.)

c

Strong visual correlation is shown by the data for permit-by-rule and total waste generation. PBR's

striking dominance of the waste generation picture receives further comment in Section 2.11.

Recurrent waste displays constant growth during this period, while both non-recurrent and radioactive

mixed waste amounts greatly from year to year. Further comments regarding these trends are found .0

later in this chapter.

TABLED

OVERALL TRENDS IN ,WASTE GENERATION, 1987-89 TONNAGES

WASTE TYPE 1987 1988 1989

.Recurrent 196,400 215,582 278,428

Radioactive mixed 47,417 179,459 32,998

Non-recurrent> 64,266 12,480 482

Permit-by-rule 1,977,205 2,166,440 4,536,866

TOTAL 2,285,287 2,573,961 4,848,772

14

o
• • •

Figure 4

Overall Trends in Waste Generation, 1987-89

TONS

• Nonrecurrent

• Radioactive .

- Iliillll Recurrent

~~~j~j~!~~~j~: P-B-R

Total

1988 1989

YEAR

-------------------~- ~~~...

/

1987

6,000,000

5,000,000 /

/

4,000,000

3,000,000 /

2,000,000

1,000,000

0
Recurrent waste is the primary focus of Ecology's' Solid and Hazardous Waste Program.

Federal funding, compliance inspections, and educational outreach all find their basis in the

population of recurrent waste generators. While other factors ~- industry-specific campaigns,

regulatory change, and public opinion -- all affect day-to-day and year-to-year operations, quantities

of recurrent waste generation occupy the lion's share of Ecology's attention. Recent development of

the Waste Reduction, Recycling, and Litter Control Program (WRRLC) underscores the concern with

this waste type. The support of technical assistance promoting waste minimization, the development

of pollution prevention planning, and the assessment of generator fees are just a few ways in which

these data are used.

2.5 Recurrent Waste Generation, 1987-89 c

Figure 5'shows:the growth in recurrent waste generation between 1987 and i989. While

totaling just under 200,000 tons reported in 1987, this waste type .grew by nearly ten percent during

1988. Although a significant growth rate, this pales beside the change between 1988 and 1989.

Comparison between the latter two years of the figure point out a nearly thirty percent

increase in recurrent waste reported. While this simple fact is certainly significant, an explanation

must rely upon more detailed analysis of where in Washington which industry groups generated how

much recurrent waste.

A caveat' regarding this rate of growth is certainly in order at this time. Annual reporting by

its very nature conveniently packages an on-going process into uniform, containers of twelve months

duration. Both waste manifested off site for management m¥l that waste accumulated on-site at year 0

end are required to be reported. However, the process of waste generation, transportation, and

management may not fit neatly into these particular packages,

For example, generated wastes may be legally stored in some cases for years until they are

eventually manifested off site. Then all at once, an unusually high number of manifests will appear

on aparticular year.'s annual report. This concept of "accumulated transport" of potlining waste by

aluminum smelters is partially responsible for the apparent growth between 1988 and·1989.

However, the absence of complete records for earlier years prevents the accurate weighting of this

particular factor.

o

16
• - ..--.~ ~-- .... , ....... --...---c-' -....,..----,--, ---.-- __ • _ ..----- - - - - ~-- - - - .

•

Figure 5

Recurrent Waste Generation, 1987-89

(in tons)

•

. 196,400

1987

215,582

1988

278,428

1989
2.6 RCRA vs. State-only Recurrent Waste, 1987-89

As was discussed previously in Section 1.4, Dangerous Waste Designation Process,

Washington's Dangerous Waste Regulations significantly differ from RCRA in the range of materials

regulated as dangerous waste. In addition to the Federal lists and characteristics, State rules include

mixtures and criteria. Waste designation according to state regulation results in the addition of

substantial quantities of state-only regulated waste. Figure 6 illustrates the relationship between .

RCRA and state-only recurrent waste during the period 1987 through 1989.

Growth in both waste categories is evident by comparing 1987's figures to those of 1989. A

net gain of almost 48,000 tons of state-only waste is accompanied by an increase of more than 35,000

tons of RCRA regulated material. Less than ten percent of the RCRA growth occurred between 1987

and 1988. Nearly two-thirds of the state-only rise took place between 1988 and 1989.

While the expansion of state-only waste closely follows the overall growth of the regulated

community, RCRA waste follows closely behind. A vast majority of the regulated community holds

its total generation fairly constant during this period. In fact, a proportion of the state's generators

begin to report the significant benefits of waste reduction practices for the first time in 1989.

Although heavily outweighing state-only waste when all waste types - recurrent, nonrecurrent, permit-by-rule, and radioactive mixed -- are included, RCRA waste comprises only slightly

more than half of the recurrent waste generated in this timeframe. Despite the increased number of

sites reporting and Ecology's heightened emphasis upon education, recurrent waste remains almost

equally split between RCRA and state-only. .

18

o

o

o
• •

~- ~_.--------------....._._~=-.._.....,,~~

•

Figure 6

-RCRA vs. State-only Recurrent Waste, 1987-89 . Tons

200,000 ,..----------------"""'-----..

49% 51%

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -~~.

50,000

0 .....-

150,000 -

100,000

Year -

1987 . 1988 1989

RCRA 102,151 105,161 137,230

State §lUt-!:;ii:fe:f{~ 94,249 110,421 141,196

196,_400 215,582 __ 278,426
In beginning to answer the question of.who reports the generation of recurrent waste in

Washington, attention is first directed to industry groups. This analysis aggregates three-digit SIC

Codes and summarizes all business types into fifteen categories. Table C illustrates these categories,

the amounts of waste reported in tons, and the percentage of total recurrent waste reported by

industry group.

2.7 Recurrent Waste Generated by Industry Group, 1989 o

For convenience, this classification can be further aggregated into groups of five each

representing a third of the categories defined. Better than ninety percent of the recurrent waste

generated in Washington during 1989 can be attributed to the first third of this classification. Primary

and fabricated metal manufacturers, the chemical and petroleum industries, equipment manufacturers,

transportation and utilities (which includes the dangerous waste management industry itself), and

government installations reported the generation of more than 250,000 tons of recurrent waste.'

The second third -- wholesale and retail trade, lumber and wood products, construction,

business services, and rubber/plastics/leather/stone -- generates smaller quantities of recurrent waste.

Over 23,000 tons are reported from these groups. However, this sum constitutes only eight percent

of the state's recurrent waste total. Lastly, the third third has only minor shares of recurrent waste

during 1989. Mining, agriculture, food and clothing, finance/insurance/real estate, and human

services together contribute only 0.2 percent of this total.

The clear dominance of the first third supports the commonly held picture of Washington's

economic structure. Residents and non-residents alike would be fairly likely to include aluminum

smelters, petroleum refineries, aircraft manufacturing, and specific Federal agencies such as Defense

and Energy when solving their particular version of the state's economic puzzle. Site-specific analysis

of recurrent waste generators continues in Section 2.8. .

20

J

0 ..',

o
•• TABLE C

RECURRENT WASTE GENERATED BY INDUSTRY GROUP, 1989'

INDUSTRY GROUP TONNAGE PERCENTAGE

Agriculture.forestry.fishing (011-097) 16 <.0.01

Mining (101-149) 5 <.0.01

Construction (152-179) 4.020 1.44

Food and clothing (201-239) 54 0.02

Lumber. wood products.printing (241-279) 3.847 1.39

I

I

I

f

:.

•

iiii~~~;i~j_i~~~~~!!tm~i·i:··ii::i:::!iiiii::j:i

Rubber.plastics.leather•stone (301-329) ............. - - '.......•...••..;. : .

:Rf.~.·~~·~r~.·m~m~....(~~:~t~i~>::: .. ·:::· ~~miil~:liif*ii~g<i!2~I)iii::!:j.!·!i:i::!·!!!!!!

!:~_I,_~II!ill:III~~~~I!~I~!I~I·i:i:i!!!:::::::::::i!ji!

Wholesale and retail trade (501-599)

Finance.insurance.real estate (601-679)

Business services (701-799)

Human services (801-899)

Public administration (911-972)

TOTAL

2.147

64

4.140

446

13,494

278.428

0.77

0.02

1.49

0.16

4.85

100.00
Having identified those industry groups playing major roles in Washington's recurrent waste

generation picture, Table D provides a ranking of the top twenty-five recurrent waste generators. The

top 25 LQG's reported more than 223,000 tons or eighty percent of all recurrent wastestreams. 'In

contrast, the more than 2,300 remaining generators contributed just under twenty percent of all

recurrent waste.

2.8 Top 25 Recurrent Waste Generators o

Familiar names dominate-this exclusive group. Primary and fabricated metals are represented

by Northwest Alloys, Reynolds, Kaiser, Alcoa, Seattle Steel, Columbia Aluminum, and Vanalco.

Texaco, Shell, and Rhone Poulenc of the chemical and petroleum industry rank highly. The Boeing

Company cracksthe top 25 with five sites in Seattle, Auburn, Everett and Tukwila... Not surprisingly,

the state's largest dangerous waste management facilities - Chemical Processors, Northwest

Enviroservice, and Crosby & Overton -- appears prominently.

However, during 1989, the single largest recurrent waste generating site was the Department

of Energy's Hanford Nuclear Reservation. Better than eleven percent of this waste type were

reported by Hanford. These figures represent continued support for the transition of this facility from

manufacturing to waste remediation laboratory. '

In addition, 32,990 tons of radioactive mixed waste were also reported by Hanford for 1989.

These wastestreams included:

1) a corrosive slurry of water and trace heavy metals from double shell tanks (18,720

tons);

2) an ignitable, corrosive, toxic solution of acids, bases, and heavy metals from lab

and plant operations (8,400 tons);

3) an ignitable, corrosive toxic solution of bases and heavy metals from plant

operations (2,066 tons); and .

4) a corrosive nitric acid solution neutralized with potassium hydroxide from

concentrator operations (1,665 tons).

r

22

o

-0
•

i.

!

I

I

I

L

t

~.

•

TABLED

TOP 25 RECURRENT WASTE GENERATORS, 1989

GENERATOR TONS PERCENT

Department of Energy - Hanford 31,955 11.5

Northwest Alloys - Addy 25,947 9.3

Reynolds Metals - Longview 22,596 8.1

Kaiser Aluminum - Mead 14,156 5.1

Wenatchee Works of Alcoa - Wenatchee 12,313 ,4.4

Chemical Processors - Seattle 11,274 4.0

Chemical Processors - Tacoma 10,428 3.7

Boeing Plant 2 - Seattle 9,057 3.3

. Lehigh Portland Cement - Metaline Falls 7,800 2.8

Boeing Thompson Site - Tukwila 7,309 2.6

Northwest Enviroservice - Seattle 7,003 2.5

Seattle Steel - Seattle 6,490 2.3

Kaiser Aluminum - Tacoma 6,091 2.2

Rhone-Poulenc - Seattle 6,054 2.2

Texaco Refining - Anacortes 5,637 2.0

Boeing - Auburn 5,016 1.8

Columbia Aluminum - Dallesport 5,005 1.8

Vanalco - Vancouver 4,243 1.5

Boeing North Boeing Field - Seattle 4,201 1.5

Berkley Structures - Seattle 3,800 1.4

Puget Sound Naval Shipyard - Bremerton 3,625 1.3

Shell Oil - Anacortes 3,612 1.3

Boeing - Everett 3,377 1.2

Crosby & OvertonlChempro - Kent 3,320 1.2

Salmon Bay Steel - Seattle 3,174 1.1

TOP 25 TOTAL 223,483 80.1

ALL OTHER GENERATORS 54,943 19.9
2.9 Recurrent Waste Generation by County, 1989

. Figure 7 clearly displays the distribution of where recurrent waste was generated in 1989.

The strength of the relationship between population and waste generation is substantiated by the

significant figures found for King, Pierce, Spokane, Clark, Snohomish, and Kitsap Counties.

However, the prominence of more rural areas such as Benton, Stevens, Cowlitz. Chelan, Skagit. and

Pend Oreille indicates that other factors are also at play.

Looking back to Table D. "Top 25 Recurrent Waste Generators", on page 21 will begin to

explain this apparent discrepancy. Eight members of this select group are located,in the more rural

areas of the state.' The presence of even one of these sites is sufficient to rapidly propel a county to .

."the top of the heap":

o

COUNTY

Benton

Stevens

Cowlitz

Chelan .

Skagit

Pend Oreille

SITE NAME

Department of Energy Hanford Reservation

Northwest Alloys

Reynolds Metals

Alcoa

Texaco, Shell

Lehigh Portland Cement

This point is made particularly clear when viewed in context of the recurrent generation for each

county found in Appendix A-I.

However, Washington's urban areas are the home to a number oflarge generators as well as

large numbers of generators. At the top in terms of population as well asIarge generators. King

County is represented by eleven sites among the top 25.

24

o

o

I

I,
• • •

County

Tonnage

l~lKW~:~M lIB

101-1,000 1,001-10,000

Figure 7

Recurrent Waste Generation

by County, 1989·

>10,000

-

King

Benton

Stevens

Pierce

Cowlitz

Spokane

Chelan

Skagit

Pend Oreille

Clark

Snohomish

Kitsap

Klickitat

Whatcom

Franklin

All others

I •••;;:;:-;:::-..;.-;.::;.;:;::........:.::;:;:;:;:-;.::;;;:;::'?-::-;.::;:.:::.::.:'?-:::::.::::.:::-;.::::-;.:::;.;:....:::::::::-;..::~:::::::x:::;·;:;:::::::;:»-.:;:*:;:-;.;:;.::;:;:;:-;.::::-;.;:;:;.::-;::;:-;.:·:::::::·-;.-;.-;.::-;.:::::::;x:-;.:::::·:;::::-;.::-;.·:::::->~:: ...:••;:;::-..;.-;.:'::.;::.::-;...»:':...:.......;:-;.:::".$-;.;:••;::::....:;.;.;":!;:::;:;:;:;::.:.::-;.:.;.;:;::::....-;.;:::.:::;:;:;:;:.;:-;.::;:..:.:;::':.:::.;..;.".;::.;.;::.... :. :...:«:;..«;::;:-;'-;'; 91,581

I

·:::::::::::.::::~:~:~.~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::~::~::::~:::::~::::::;::::::...::::::::::::::x:::;...:::::::::::..:::::~:::~~~::::::::~:~:<::::1I32,OM I I I I

••••:-::;.;.:...:••::.:...:::.:.:-;.::.::-;:~:::::::-;.:::.-;.:~:::-;..:: ;::::::-:::::-:- :: :: ::,:::::: ::: ..·;»··: 25,9511 I I I I

•.:::~::~-:~::::-:~:::::=>.::::::::::::.::::::::::.:.:::::::::.:;:;:'$::'::::::::::=::::':'::::::::X::;:::::-::::: 24,404 I I I I

23,709 I I I I ••:::::::::';':::::::;''i-:::::::::::::::::::.::::;'::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;.:::::::::::....:::'$.:::::::::

I I I I

':.:::::::::::::::::::::::::;,::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::....:-;.: 1'{>'J5 I I I I

·..';::::;;:,~:~~::::~:::~:::~:::~~~::~~::::~ 12,362 I I I I I

".:;::::::::::0$:"-::::::::::;:::::::::::::::::;:::::: 11,370 I I I I I

7,817 I I I I I ·.,::;;::..:~~:::::~:::~.~:

I I I I I

:.....«-:;:::y-,:...:::: 7,454 I I I I I

•;;'-:::::::::":=::::::;: 6,034 I . I I I I

.:::::-;.:::::::::::::::: 5,643 I I I I I .-

5,030 I I I I I ::::::::::::":::::::

::12•

719 I I I I I

I I I I I

:'1,231 I I I I I

:.3,378 I I I I I

I

·0 20,000 40,000 60,000

Tons

80,000 100,000 120,000
2.10 Recurrent Waste Recycled On-site by County, 1989

In order to support public and private efforts toward waste minimization and source reduction,

Ecology began in 1989 to collect data measuring on-site recycling of dangerous waste. The

mechanism is quite simple; generators were introduced to a value R in the Form 4's "Status" field

(Column 15C). Those wastes meeting the regulatory definition of recycling (WAC 173-303-016,017)

taking place at the site of generation could now be identified.

Independent of government assistance,' individuals and organizations had assessed the costs

and benefits of on-site recycling. Financial advantages are obvious:

1) after the initial purchase of equip-ment, .capital outlays for new inputs to the

production process decrease;

2) significant savings result from lower expenditures' for transportation and waste

management contractors; and

3) liabilities associated with cradle-to-grave waste management are greatly reduced.

Of at least equal consideration, however, are the contributions to personal and societal quality

of life. Personal responsibility rises as control of waste management shifts to the 'generating sites.

The' number of waste shipments on the highways -- and the risk associated with such transportation --

declines. Quantities of waste requiring off-site management exhibit the potential for up to ninety

percent reduction by weight.

As Figure 8 illustrates, the number of on-site recyclers comprise less than five percent of all

sites reporting in 1989 (164 out of 3,798). The amount of waste recycled in this manner equals less

than one percent of Washington's 1989 recurrent waste total. However, it is the start of a trend that

will be subject to private and public support and demand.

Washington's first depiction of where on-site recycling takes place is also shown in Figure 8.

Innovators choosing this option for waste management are again most strongly associated with the

more densely settled portions of-the state. The sixty-seven sites reporting from King County total

nearly 750 tons of recycled waste or 36.6 percent of the State total. While significant, this figure is

only 0.8 percent of the county's reported recurrent waste total.

Other counties demonstrated higher levels of on-site recycling occurring in 1989 as is shown

in Table E. Kitsap County had two sites recycling 272 tons or almost five percent of the County's

recurrent waste. Grays Harbor County's generators recycled more than seven percent of their

recurrent waste. Finally, Thurston County led the state by reporting 138 tons or thirty percent of

recurrent waste as having been recycled on-site in 1989.

Few conclusions regarding on-site recycling can be reached through the collection of a single

year's data. .Obviously, great opportunities for further diffusion of this innovation exist. The

development of new market niches will attract entrepreneurs, technology, and product development,

Government can and must provide incentives to encourage this option. Continuing educational efforts

by regulators and business associations will hopefully result in tangible changes to be supported by

.future collection of this information.

26

c

o

o
• • •

County

:

1•. :<1

>0

I~WNf¥J >50

I

I

11II

>100

-

>500

:

Figure 8

Recurrent Waste

Recycled On-site

by County, 1989

749

I

I

o 200 400

Tons

600 800 1,000
•

TABLE E

RECURRENT WASTE RECYCLED ON-sITE BY COUNTY IN 1989

PERCENTAGE % OF COUNTY

SITES TONNAGE OF STATE RECURRENT

COUNTY REPORTING REPORTED TONNAGE WASTE

Benton 7 28.98 1.4 <0.1

Chelan 3 26.48 1.3 0.2

Clark 6 101.06 4.9 1.3

Cowlitz 2 71.73 3.5 0.3

Grays Harbor 2 15.03 0.7 .7.2

King 67 749.33 . 36.6 0.8

Kitsap 2 272.28 13.3 4.8

Kittitas 1 0.88 <0.1 22.0

Lewis 1 72.95 3.6 15.1

Pacific 1 0.25 <0.1 5.0

Pierce 24 108.31 5.3 0.4

Skagit 3 6552 3.2 0.6

Snohomish 18 82.22 4.0 1.4

Spokane 12 229.52 11.2 1.3

Thurston 7 138.01 6.7 30.4

Walla Walla 1 1.9 <0.1 0.5

Whateom 4 64.14 3.1 2.3

Yakima 3 20.10 1.0 3.8

WASHINGTON 164 2,048.69 100.0 : 0.7
---~--.~--

·2.UP'ennit-by-ruie Waste Generaticm by ,County, 1989

Since 1987, Washington dangerous waste generators have reported sizeable quantities of

wastewater designating as dangerous waste underpermit-by-rule. (These data are shown in Section

2.4 and Figure 4, pages 12-13..) As the understandingofpermit-by-rule regulations increases,

additional generators can expect to be identified. Ecology's educationaloutreachand guidance, as

well as increased emphasis'asa component of compliance inspections, willcontribute to the continued '

growth of this waste type. Initial efforts in this direction are largely responsible for the :growth

exhibited in Figure 4.

Figure 9 displays the state's distribution ofpermit-by-rule wastes.' Skagit County alone

reporred more than fifty-seven ,percent ofthese wastewaters. King and Pierce account for another lA

million tons or nearly thirty percent. The remaining twelve percent are divided ,primarily between

Clark, Spokane, Grant, Benton, Snohomish, Kitsap, and Stevens Counties.

Those Industriesreperting permit-by-rule waste are shown in Table F.The ,chemical and

petroleum industry generated more 'than seventypeFcentof all.reported wastewaterIn 1989.

Equipmentmanufacturingresulted in more than one million tons or twenty-three percent ofthe state's

total. Six ofthe .remaining seven percent were contributed by the primary and fabricated metals

industry. 'Less than one percent ·of all permit-by-rule waste was generated by all other industry

groups.

o

The narrow spectrumof industrial activity is mirrored by the extreme. concentration ofpermit-

'by-role waste to:v.ery few sitesacross Washington. As can be seen in Table G,. the topfifieen 0

generators are responsible for greater than ,ninety-eight percent of allPBR w.astes. Those counties

figuring 'prominently in Figure9's mapping rise to the top of Table G as well:

Skagit

King

PierCe

Clark

Spokane

Benton

Snohomish

Kitsap

.shell Oil

Boeing-Auburn, Industrial Plating; Asko Processing, Hytek Finishes,

Davis Walker, Protective Coatings

Occidental Chemical

SEH America, Union Carbide

Keytronic

USDOE-Hanford

Boeing-Everett .

Puget Sound Naval Shipyard.

An other reporters contributed less than two percent of the state's permit-by-rule generation.

o

.30
• • •

ItlrmJ~~1

>10,000

fJ!D

>100,000 >500,000

-

Figure 9

Permit-by-rule

Waste Generation

by County, 1989

4t~i~lt:*~:::~

:;::~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~illffi

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - '- - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

-

II

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,. - - - - - - - - - - - - -

-

i1- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

,~;~::::::i;~~i~i:1J .E~;:~:~~;:;:;;:~:::~ :I:::~~::::::::::::l9' 4t:::::::::~t?:p A::::::~~:~:~::r:::w .. .'. .. .. ... A::N~t:::::~:::::r ./::::littJ7 A:i:::::::::::I:::Y

Tons

3,000,000

2,500,000

2,000,000

1,500,000

1,000,000

500,000

o

Skagit King Clark Spokane Grant

County

Benton Snohomish K1tsap Stevens All otbers
,----~----

TABLE F

WASTEWATER GENERATED UNDER PERMIT-BY-RULE BY INDUSTRY GROUP, 1988-1989

585 0.03

506,195 23.71

157,070 7.35

1,373,821 64.36

793 0.03

0 0.00

96,101 . 4.50

2,134,566 100.00

TONS PERCENT

CHANGE CHANGE

18 3.1

2,683,576 530.2

128,742. 82.0

-329,448 -24.0

666 84.0

INDUSTRY GROUP

Lumber, wood products, printing (241-279)

Wholesale and retail trade (501-599)

Human services (801-899)

Public administration (911-972)

TOTAL

o

TONS '89

603

1,459

1

14,847

4,536,866

PERCENT '89

0.01

0.03

0.00

0.33

100.00

o

TONS '88 PERCENT '88

-81,254

2,402.,300

-84.6

112.5

o
• •

TABLEG

TOP 15 PERMIT-BY-RULE WASTE GENERATORS, 1989

•

COMPANY WASTE STREAM TONNAGE PERCENTAGE

Shell Oil :.. Anacortes Kerosene, 1-1-1 trichloroethane 2,600,000 57.31

Boeing - Auburn Cadmium, lead 615,450 13.57

Occidental Chemical - Tacoma Sulfuric acid 504,102 11.11

SEH America - Vancouver Hydrofluoric acid 169,470 3.74

Keytronic - Spokane Sulfuric acid, copper, nickel 143,792 3.17

Union Carbide - Washougal Hydrofluoric acid 105,988 2.34

USDOE -.Hanford , Sulfuric acid 71,810 1.58

Boeing - Everett Cadmium, chromium, methylene chloride, 59,140 1.30

xylene, methyl ethyl ketone, acetone, toluene

Industrial Plating - Seattle Cadmium, chromium, lead 50,500 1.11

AskoProcessing - Seattle Cadmium, chromium, copper, lead 39,821 0.88

HytekFinishes - Kent Cadmium, chromium 37,980 0.84

DavisWalker .- Kent Chromium, sulfuric acid, hydrochloric .acid 20,415 0.45

Boeing - Auburn Oil, coolants 16,750 0.37

Protective Coatings - Seattle Cadmium, chromium . 14,215 0.31

Puget Sound Naval Shipyard - Cadmium, chromium, lead, barium 12,425 0.27

Bremerton

TOP 15 GENERATORS 4,461,858 98.35

ALL OTIIERS 75,008 1.65
CHAPTER 3. DANGEROUS WASTE MANAGEMENT

Having discussed the generation side of the cradle-to-grave equation in some detail, Chapter 3

of the Summary examines the "how" and "where" of Washington's dangerous waste management.

Data drawn from Ecology's Form 5, "Waste Management Facility Annual Dangerous Waste Report",

is used to assess management methods at in-state facilities. Information from "Generator Annual

Dangerous Waste Reports" provides a basic picture of waste exports. Analyses of both data sets are

combined to discuss net flows of dangerous waste in 1989.

3.1 1989 Washington Management Facility Demographics

Treatment/storage/disposal facilities (fSDF's) are required by Federal and State law to

operate under a permit issued by an authorized agency. In Washington, facility permitting is

conducted by both USEPA Region 10 and Ecology's Solid and Hazardous Waste Program. The

permit·consists of an initial application; known as the Part A, and a much more extensive and detailed

successor, the Part B. A TSDF is considered to be permitted once its Parts A and B have received

approval from both issuing agencies. The lengthy preparation and review process for permit approval

or denial requires a regulatory transition stage known as interim status. TSDF's in existence on

November 19, 1980 may operate under interim status until a final permit decision is made. New'

entrants into the industry must have both their Parts A and B approved prior to operation.

Data used in Chapter 3 is derived primarily from Ecology's Form 5, "Waste Management

Facility Annual Dangerous Waste Report". Form 5's are received from permitted or interim status

TSDF's, immediate recyclers, and permit-by-rule facilities. (Information relating to permit-by-rule

generation is.found in Section 2.11.) Permit-by-rule facilities submit Form 5 solely to report the

management methods for their PBR waste. Therefore, the set of waste management facilities

operating in Washington in 1989 divides into two distinguishable groups: 1) TSDF's; and 2)

immediate, or 24-hour, recyclers.

Further distinctions can be made between ·commercial TSDF's and captive facilities. A

facility is determined to be captive if the waste managed is either generated on-site or received from a

select group of generators usually having the same ownership..Examples ofcaptive facilities

identified in Washington include: the Boeing Company's Auburn, Everett, and Renton locations and

the Federal Government's Defense Reutilization and Mobilization Organization's (DRMO) Fort Lewis

site.

In contrast, immediate recycler refers to those commercial firms accepting off-site waste and

incorporating these wastes into the recycling process within 24 hours. As the local market for

recycling has grown, so have the regulatory requirements for facilities meeting this definition.

However, in 1989 only.the first steps in the transition of applicable requirements - from generator to

TSDF -- were in motion. .

Table H provides a listing of Washington's commercial TSDF's and primary immediate

recycler. Clearly, the geographic distribution bears a strong correlation to that of the generator

population. The absence of management options for generators in eastern Washington has been

identified as an impediment to pricing and services provided. On the other hand, most firms west of

the Cascade Mountains were able to choose from a range of management methods and service

providers: .

34

o

o

o
•

•

TABLEH

WASlDNGTON COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT FACILrrIEs, i989

COUNTY CITY FACILITY NAME METHOD

Clark Washougal Chemical Processors T,S

Franklin Pasco Safety-Kleen S

King Auburn Safety-Kleen S

Kent Chemical Processors T,S

Seattle Chemical Processors - Pier 91 S

Seattle Chemical Processors - Georgetown T,S

Seattle Northwest Enviroservice T,S

Pierce Tacoma Lilyblad Petroleum S

Tacoma Northwest Processing S

Tacoma Sol-Pro R

Snohomish Lynnwood Safety-Kleen S

Spokane Spokane Safety-Kleen S

Spokane Washington Chemical T,S

Yakima Yakima Cameron-Yakima T,S

Note: For the purposes of Table H, "Methods" are

symbolized by the following codes: S = storage;

T=treatment, and R=immediate recycler.

35
3.2 Waste Management Methods at Washington Facilities, 1989 o

Figure 10 provides a snapshot of the overall picture of waste management methods at Washington

TSDF's during 1989. At a glance, recurrent waste managed in-state appears to have been almost equally

divided between storage, treatment, and disposal. The disposal figures are particularly notable. Ninetynine percent of the disposal activity was reported by captive facilities. This conforms with the prevailing

status of Washington having no commercial disposal facilities. These facilities disposed dangerous waste

via land treatment or surface impoundments destined to be closed as landfills.

In contrast, radioactive mixed waste was primarily stored with very little actual disposal

occurring. (All radioactive mixed waste reported in 1989 was generated and managed by the Department

of Energy at the Hanford Reservation.) Finally, in the case ofipermit-by-rule wastewater, nearly all

waste was treated with little, if any, storage and/or disposal reported.

Actual values of the data depicted in Figure 10 are found in Table I. Further discussion of

Washington waste management activities distinguish between on-site and off-site (but still in-state)

facilities. This discussion is found in Section 3.3.

TABLE I

WASTE MANAGEMENT METIlODS AT WASlDNGTON FAC~ITIES, 1989 TONNAGES

Recurrent Radioactive mixed Permit-by-rule Total

Disposal 46,050 0 71,631 117,681

Storage 69,320 233,427 125 302,872

Treatment 43,533 133,660 4,523,395 4,700,588

TOTAL i58,903 367,087 4,595,151 5,121,151

36

'0

o
•

Tons

._-... "'--'- ...---, --, - -,,--- - ....--- • .---~ ..----...-.-----~ ............-~ ---...--~ ~-y ...--.---...-~---- ..

•

Figure 10

Waste Management Methods

at Washington Facilities, 1989 _

•

5,000,000

4,000,000

3,000,000

2,000,000

1,000,000 , .

,

,

,

,

• Radioactive

P-B-R

:~~r} Total .:.:-:.:-:.

. Disposal Storage Treatment

Management Method
3.3 On-site Management of Dangerous Waste, 1989

Data gathered from 1989 Facility Annual Reports relating to on-site management of dangerous'

waste is illustrated in Figure .11. Slightly more than ninety-eight percent, or 4,595,151 tons, ofall waste

managed on-site consisted of permit-by-rule wastewaters. Only 92,069 tons of recurrent waste were

managed on-site during 1989.

o

, The situation presented by those facilities

storing waste on-site in 1989 is very similar. Three

aluminum smelters -- Kaiser (Mead and Tacoma) and

Alcoa (Wenatchee) -- reported more than ninety-nine

percent of the waste stored on-site as landfilled potliner.

.The vast majority of this material was later exported to

Oregon for disposal. Kaiser Aluminum in Mead was

responsible for more than fifty-five percent of this total.

:j!i;1.;:.~!:.~~.i;:.~·.;·,:.i.;ii.:~.~.!.;:.~i!·.~.~i ! ; .······,··<\······Pi-!P§~~~~ep:.*#g··.g~ij

;.:.DD·.: .••·.ss•• ••.e.:.· •. 00••.•..•.··:•.••.•. ·,••.••..•.•:..uT...•.:•.·.·:.·:·•.•. .•.n. an.••:,:,·,.•.•.d,.: .•.·:•... · •... ••.. ··.•.e

d

•...:,.·.•. .•·.·•.r.f·· .•:...•,·••.•..·.~ ••••••..•.•..,·: ••.•.'.•.• •.••.•••.. ·.•.O••.•,l.•.•.·.•.· .•.~:•.•.•.·.:.•::.·•..•...•.,·.•.•.. ,•.••.••. ·.,d.·.· .•:..•.•••. ~.,·.: ••.•. ·.•.•:•.•• ·.n:· .•... ·•.··,•.•.•. ·..::.J..•..•~.·.•..•.••.•.•..•,c.•.•.·,•••.•.•.t•.•.•.•. ,••,.•••.•1.••.·.·.;.lii l!lj1ll "- ··.•.·,·.··.·~···an· .. ···d··:,..··.:··,.... t·.·.·r....·e.. ··.a.·t·m·'e'n.. ·t····.'.····:·.··:··· .••.•.••..•..••,•..•,•..'.••....••.•.•:..:.••..•...•••. :::,,::••,:.::,..,:::. ·····D82L .../: •••.•••••••••••••.

·;l'lif~llllllll_I_II;\;,;ir~ illl

'.:::(\::):?~ /~;~::::: ,"' -.-:.... ::-;. :" :.;;;i;;;.~ ::~;;::; ./~~;::(:.::.... .•.•.~:.•.·.;.;.••·::1.\:·.••• .••.::.·.::.~.\.·.•.•.•:::.•.•.:~.:.:.;~.:.~.: ..~.~•••::~,.:.~.•.•..•...•..;.~...~.,·.::.~::.·.••.:.:l ..•..••..•..•:.........••••.••·••• .':'::::.,~.'...::.~ ::<:.:: :.:"':'-". ::.::: :..:.... ··::}::::::~«~~:;~~:>\;()(:~t~/\~~\:<r ;\::

·i)y .~~~~g;~.'j@;i~$~gq~~:):\

•.•. .•.:·.·,·".·••.·:•.•·.,.••:•.·:•.~S~~O.~.~2·.~U~.~ .• ll.ilii~~!llillr . ..•.):.•..•,.•:.•..:·: ..•. .........• Ui':

::::-.:-;

~1It!! ::.::.;:::: "::;:-:;:::;::;::::;lililitfi.i'!III(~(1~111 . ..- , '.......•.., :.: .;.:.:.;...:-..:..

.::':.~:.•.:•.•.•:.:...~.,:.:~:..~.: •. ..'::.:.:..•.,::,.:.~.,.••.•'.•• ::.:.;.••,:.•:.......... .:::.:>:,., :::-:: :\•.).~~.j;.;.{..~:....:\.~:.::.~.'.::.:....)..::,}.. :.:.:•...r::.j.~.~..:.·:.::,::.:·:·,'.:.·.~.~~..~,·•.:::•.r.:~..~~:.::.:·.{.r()r(~{:~ <)t)i:~~{~ r\\\( ::::;:::::::::;:::::::::;: '.'.",' .", .,: .•. ,•. :.,•.••::•••..::.:.,••::,•.:~:•.•:..:..••,••:..••.. ,.::.:':::'. ".cc- :.: :{}}~:\~\.::.,; .~..;::.: \\/ .", ':.:;:::;".:;:::;:::'::::::::::;:;:::::;::::;;).:;::::::::;::;:{:}:;::f}:::::: - - ' , ,-... ....• .•. ..,:::'.:..•;::..:~ :,.•..... :.::.,':::•... :'.:..•.....• ':., .•:.,:::::: ;.; . ":::::/;";' -.::::: ::::.: ::-,:,'.:: :': ji~)(j.m\})

<»<..............'!'E~~~#~.~~!

:

:.••:::., ... ....••....•~,.~.::.:.•'.:•.:.:•.•...,:.:::..:~.~•.:.•.~.,.;...:.•.~., •.~.:.:.: ..'.•..•.. '.•.,~..'~•..•...•• .•.:••.:.,..'.~::•.:.•.....•:.•.... :.~.:..••.~.: ;...•.,...... ... ... ... .. ..,.... ... .... . :>}f}}~{:?)}}} [..~.:~.j~..~.~;::..'.~::\ ..~.::.~:,::.\.::: ..•.~;.~. :;}:~;;~:{;:\:::;~;:~::;:::~:::~:~::::':::'::::."'. ~:\\1~\)~;:.:~:.~1;;~~:.:\:.:;:.~;-.~\~.\;":jlr.~r.~.j.~.~.:;.~.~.::.~ ..~:.~~.~~..~:.; ::·.::<:?(Tnermal\··'··::···'·:·'>:>':":"·: ':(\ ...>... eli" ······1········; ·.·.·i}···.

.••.:•........••...••....•... ,.•.•.•...:•.•........ ,..........•...•.. ,.•..:•..•.....•...•.:•..••.....•.. ,,•....:.....•.....•...•.......•..:.•• '.•.•.......•.....••..•..•.•.•..:..•........•.....:....••.•:.•..••............•••....:..•...:.•...::•.•..•.....:: ···~h·)·tt:l~~g~::·t?;···················:······· ;: !r.i~)~~1~¥srlt~\lIG2·. ,••.••.••.•• :•.•:!.•.••..•,•,•:•.:••:••.•.'.•.•.'.•:••.••.••.•:.

·)·X\.:·:$~P*(:)gi.¢t:lj.r<.']:· ~:::~::)~{{r~{}r\\~:::~\/~:~;~{::::: ..;::::;::::;:::::::::;: :;:::;:::::: ;::::;;}::::<.;::::.: .

Handling codes

In this analysis, a hierarchical system has been

used within the following guidelines. Categories of

management -- disposal, storage, and treatment -- have

been identified using waste handling codes reported on

the facilities' Form 5's. Any provision of a disposal

code -- separately or in combination with other handling

codes -- led to the conclusion that the waste had been

disposed on-site. Likewise, the inclusion of any storage

code -- in the absence of disposal codes -- assumed .

storage of the waste reported. Waste aggregated under

the treatment classification had any and all handling

codes provided indicating treatment methods.

On-site disposal reported in 1989 was primarily

limited to a small group of petroleum refmeries and

primary metal producers. Texaco, Shell, British

Petroleum (BP), and Arco were responsible for land

farming 11,586 tons of DAF float and API separator

sludges. ReynoldsMetals (Longview) disposed of

21,672 tons of black mud resulting from cryolite

processing in a surface impoundment to be closed as a

landfill. Northwest Alloys (Addy) landfilled 12,538

tons of baghouse dust and condenser residues.

38

o

o
• -'- -.._-..~-----..... .... - ------~ -----~ ------ ~'" -~.- .....---~ -.....---~ ..------.- ".----.--.-:~~~~. ~-------..----- . -,,---

• •

4,687,220 tons managed

,

\

,

,

\ 92,069 tons ,

\ \ 2% \

\

\

Figure 11

On-site Management

of Dangerous Waste, 1989

I Treatment I

878 tons

-..

Storage

45,217 tons

Disposal

45,974 tons
3.4 Washington Dangerous Waste Imports, '1989

The distribution of states generating dangerous waste imported to Washington facilities for

management is found in Figure 13. Eighteen states and Canada were identified as sources of the 18,783

tons of imported waste to Washington facilities. (Specific figures for waste received from out-of-state

generators is found in Appendix A-2.) While most waste received had its origins west of the Mississippi

River, several distinctions between sources may be noted.

Oregon was the only state exceeding the 10,000 ton threshold for imported waste in 1989. In

fact, more than fifty-five percent of all imports were received from Oregon generators. Proximity to

Washington facilities and subsequent connection to the national waste management industry explains the

strength of this relationship and the significant "trade" with: California. Idaho. and Montana. As the

location of the primary ports of entry for goods from the North Pacific, Washington is the historic

destination for waste generated in Alaska as well. Much of this material was also subject to Federal

contracts requiring waste management solely by specific firms. Most of the remaining waste imports are

also largely explained as an attempt to minimize transportation costs associated with waste management.

o

However, some connections to Washington's wastemanagement industry appear to defy

geographic proximity. Nearly one thousand tons of dangerous waste were imported from Pennsylvania

during 1989. In this particular case, a very specific waste stream -- radioactive lead -- was imported by

only one receiving facility -- Energy's Hanford facility -- without concern for additional transportation

costs. All in all, very few examples of cross-country attraction are found in explaining the sources of

imported waste management during 1989. '

Over the period 1987 through 1989, Washington's dangerous,waste imports have nearly doubled. 0

Facilities reported receiving 9,705 tons of out-of-state waste for treatment and storage in 1987. By 1988,

this figure had increased by 3,413 tons to 13,122 and by 1989 the addition of another 5,661 tons had

raised the total received to 18,783 tons. Among the reasons for this rise are: 1) clarification of the permit

status of Cameron-Yakima and its thermal treatment of activated carbon filters; and 2) the increased

quantity of waste generated by out-of-state Federal facilities received for treatment and storage by

Northwest Enviroservice.

Figure 12. Washington Dangerous Waste

Imports, 1987-1989 r

Import

tons

. . ............... .

. . . . . .. ... >/1

o

40
• - - -.,.--- . --..--- - ----. ...,.---. ,,----. .. _ ..--- ....-- ..- ....---.. - ....- . .. - . - - .

• .Figure 13

Washington Dangerous Waste Imports, 1989

TONS

•
Dangerous waste exported by Washington generators in 1989 is the subject of Figure 15. In this

case, twenty-three states and Canada were recipients of Washington generated dangerous waste. While

.the pattern found on this map bears similarities to that distribution found in Figure 12, the amounts of

waste exported exceeded imports by more than a factor of six -- 114,525 to 18,783 tons. While

acknowledging this difference, it must be noted that Washington regulates materials not considered to be

waste in many other states. For that reason, the comparison between imports and exports must be

qualified.

3.5 Washington Dangerous Waste Exports, 1989 o

Figure 14. Washington Dangerous Waste

BxPorts. 1987-1989.·

1 35 325 1 9 B7-

1 34 054 8000timl 1 14 5 25

-

:~:~;:::

I

Expo, t

I t ons

"

As was the case with imports, the largest proportions of exported waste went to nearby

destinations or distant facilities providing' specific services. Once again, Oregon leads those states

receiving waste in 1989. Nearly seventy percent of all waste exported from Washington was managed by

Oregon facilities. As shown by the data found in Appendix A-2, no other state received more than 7,000

tons of Washington waste. The vast majority of these wastes were disposed at Chern-Security Systems'

Arlington facility. Illinois, California, Idaho, Kansas, Pennsylvania, Nebraska, and Texas comprise the

second tier of states receiving Washington waste.

Illinois and California both have well developed management industries capable of servicing many

needs of the regulated community. Idaho, Kansas, Pennsylvania, Nebraska, and Texas are the home of

individual -- or a limited set of -- facilities linked to Washington's generators in 1989. Idaho possesses

Envirosafe Services' Grandview RCRA landfill. Kansas, Nebraska, and Missouri are the home of cement

kilns burning alternative fuels containing spent solvents. Texas and Pennsylvania offered more specific

options for particular waste streams - incineration and recycling, respectively.

Several other states received lesser proportions of Washington's generators' business. Waste

brokers balancing costs and services directed significant amounts of regulated material to Utah, Arizona,

Missouri, Arkansas, and Louisiana. In addition, opportunities afforded by nearby Canadian facilities have

continued to make further inroads within Washington's waste management alternatives.

Between 1987 and 1989, Washington's dangerous waste exports have gradually decreased. From

a high of 135,325 tons in 1987, slight dropping to 134,054 in 1988, to 1989's. reporting of 114,525 tons.

The early adoption of on-site recycling technologies as well as more competitive position of Washington

management facilities may begin to explain this decline. This reduction in exports has been most strongly

felt in neighboring

states such as Oregon

and Idaho.

42

o

o
• '•

Figure 15

Washington Dangerous Waste Exports, 1989,

•

{)

TONS
3.6 Net Flows of Dangerous Waste, 1989

Figure 16, "Net Flow of Dangerous Waste, 1989", illustrates the exchange of dangerous waste

for management between Washington and its fellow states. For the first time, differences between

imports and exports have been analyzed and presented. .Two obvious groupings result from this

comparison: 1) those states sending more waste to Washington than they are receiving as exports or net

exporters; and 2) net importers receiving more Washington waste than that sentto Washington facilities

for management.

Those areas identified as net exporters include Alaska, Hawaii, Montana, North Dakota, and

Canada. Most, if not all, of these origins have little, if any, waste management capacity developed. The

exception to this generalization is Canada and more specifically the province of British Columbia. Net

movement of waste southward into Washington in this case results from strong economic links between

Washington facilities and Canadian brokers and/or transporters.

On the other hand, net importers of Washington waste are spread across the United States. In

order of amounts received, Oregon stood above all other destinations for Washington waste. Due to the

availability of commercial landfill capacity, more than 72,000 tons of net waste flows entered Oregon in

1989. The next largest movement of waste was 6,500 tons received by Illinois. Clearly, Oregon has

little competition in dominating the network of regulated waste flows with regard to Washington's waste.

o

Most states having disposal or recycling facilities were shown to be net importers of waste in

1989. Incinerators in Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Utah attracted Washington waste in their

direction. Cement kilns in Missouri, Kansas,and Nebraska had similar effects. As long as the state is

lacking in commercial waste management capacity, this picture of widely spread destinations for 0

Washington waste should continue intact.

o

44
•

Figure

•

16

Net Flows of Dangerous Waste, 1989

•

UT

- - -1[)[ - - - -

PA

OR

72,757

II

IL

co I!

:::: ::::::::::C:~ ::::::iii!

Net importers to Washington

~. - - - .- -AK' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ..., - - ---. =-:- - -.: - - -m- ----------.: ---". ---- eN m ND

2,000

o

(2,000)

(4,000)

(8,000)

(6,000)

(10,000)

(12,000)

Tons

4,000
•

f

•

f

f

I,

•

APPENDIX A

Data Tables
APPENDIX A-1

Recurrent Waste Generated by County, 1988-1989

CHANGE CHANGE

COUNTY TONS (1989) TONS (1988) TONS PERCENT

1988-1989 1988-1989

Adams 1 2 -1 -50.0

Asotin 2 1 1 100.0

Benton 32,094 480 .31,614 6,586.2

Chelan 12,362 14,027 -1,665 -11.9

Clallam 71 36 35 97.2

Clark 7,454 7,951 -497 -6.3

Columbia 2 2 ·0 0.0

Cowlitz 23,709 46,717 -23,008 -49.2

Douglas 27 29 -2 -6.9

Ferry 1 1 0 0.0

Franklin 1,231 462 769 166.4

Garfield 2 1 1 100.0

Grant 251 266 -15 -5.7

Grays Harbor 210 145 65 44.8

Island 758 1,032 -274 -26.5

Jefferson 82 68 14 20.6

King 91,581 78,604 12,977 16.5

Kitsap 5,643 4,565 1,078 23.6

Kittitas 4 8 -4 -50.0

Klickitat 5,030 3,676 1,354 36.8

Lewis 482 646 -164 -25.4

Lincoln 8 1 7 700.0

Mason 75 88 -13 -14.8

Okanogan 1 9 -8 -88.9

Pacific 5 17 -12 -70.6

Pend Oreille 7,817 18,704 -10,887 -58.2

Pierce 24,404 26,895 -2,491 -9.3

o

o

o
•

•

COUNTY TONS (1989) TONS (1988) CHANGE CHANGE

TONS PERCENT

1988-1989 1988-1989

San Juan 0 0 0 0.0

Skagit 11,370 1,974 9,396 475.9

Skamania 0 1 -1 -100.0

Snohomish 6,034 5,302 732 13.8

Spokane 17,695 14,045 3,650 25.9

Stevens 25,958 9,712 16,146 167.3

Thurston 454 567 -113 -20.0

Wahkiakum 0 1 -1 -100.0

Walla Walla 372 133 239 179.1

Whateom 2,779 5,652 -2,873 -50.8

Whitman 46 13 33 253.8

Yakima 525 , 337 188 55.8

WASlDNGTON 278,426 215,582 62,844 29.2
APPENDIX A-2

Net Flows of Dangerous Waste, 1989 (Tons)

STATE/COUNTRY IMPORTS TO EXPORTS FROM NET FLOW TO

WASHINGTON WASHINGTON WASHINGTON

Canada 160.3 79.8 +80.5

Alabama 0.0 15.2 -15.2

Alaska 1,232.7 0.0 +1,232.7

Arkansas 0.0 769.8 -769.8

Arizona 3.4 348.3 -344.9

California 4,254.2 5,739.5 -1,485.3

Colorado ") 3.0 19.8 -16.8

Hawaii 62.8 0.0 +62.8

Iowa 0.3 0.0 +0.3

Idaho 270.7 4,565.4 -4,294.7

Illinois 8.0 6,542.7 -6,534.7

Kansas 0.0 4,384.9 -4,384.9

Louisiana 0.0 226.1 -226.1

Michigan 0.0 0.7 -0.7

Missouri 0.0 405.7 -405.7

Montana 720.9 0.0 +720.9

Nebraska 0.0 1,719.5 -1,719.5

Nevada 10.7 9.2 +1.5

New Jersey- 1.3 0.0 +1.3

New York 0.0 0.5 -0.5

North Carolina 6.0 0.0 +6.0

North Dakota 45.2 0.0 +45.2

Ohio 0.0 5.1 -5.1

Oklahoma 0.0 0.8 -0.8

Oregon 11,013.2 83,771.0 -72,757.8

Pennsylvania 974.3 - 3,856.1 -2,881.8

South Carolina 0.0 0.1 -0.1

South Dakota 2.1 58.8 -56.7

Tennessee 0.0 0.1 -0.1

Texas 0.0 1,589.5 -1,589.5

Utah 5.2 416.8 -411.6

Wyoming 9.5- 0.0 +9.5

TOTALS 18,783.80 114,525.40 -95,741.60

o

o

o
•

f

•

•

APPENDIX B

USEPA Waste Codes

and

Washington State-only Waste Codes
II. WASHINGTON STATE HAZARDOUS WASTE CODES AND DESCRIPTIONS

Characteristics

0001

0002

0003

Ignitabile

Corrosive

Reactive

EP Toxicity

0004

0005

0006

0007

0008

0009

0010

0011

0012

0013

0014

0015.

0016

0017

Arsenic

Barium

Cadmium

Chromium

Lead

Mercury

Selenium

Silver

Endrin

Lindane

Methoxychlor

Toxaphene

2,4-0

2,4,s-TP Silvex

Nonspecific Sources

Generic:

electroplating

degreasing:

chloride,

chlorinated

solvents in

FOOl

F002

F003

F004

FOOs

F006

F007

F008

F009

FOIO

• FOll

F012

The following spent halogenat~d solvents used in

Tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, methylene

1,1, I-trichloroethane, carbon tetrachloride, and

fluorocarbons; and sludges from the recovery of these

degreasing operations. (See footnote 1, below.)

The following spent halogenated 'solvents: Tetrachloroethylene,

methylene chloride, trichloroethylene, 1, 1, l-trichloroethane,

chlorobenzene, 1,1,2-trichloro-l,2,2-trifluoroethane,

ortho-dichlorobenzene, and trichlorofluoromethane; and the still

bottoms ftom the recovery of these solvents. (See footnote 1,

below. )

The following spent nonhalogenated solvents: Xylene, acetone, ethyl

Acetate,ethyl benzene, ethyl ether, methyl isobutyl ketone, n-butyl alcohol,cyclohexanone, and methanol; and the still bottoms from the

recovery of these solvents.

The following spent nonhalogenated solvents: Cresols and cresylic

acid, nitrobenzene; and the still bottoms from the recovery of these

solvents.

The following spent nonhalogenated solvents: Toluene, methyl ethyl ketone, carbon disulfide, isobutanol, pyridine; and the still

bottoms from the recovery of these solvents.

Wastewater treatment sludges from electroplating operations except

from the following processes: (1) Sulfuric acid anodizing of

aluminum; (2) tin plating on carbon steel; (3) zinc plating

(segregated basis) on carbon steel; (4) aluminum or zinc-aluminum

plating on carbon steel; (5) cleaning/stripping associated with tin,

zinc, and aluminum plating on carbon steel; and (6) chemical etching and milling of aluminum.

Spent cyanide plating bath solutions from

operations.

plating bath residues from the bottom of plating baths from

electroplating operations where cyanides are used in the process.

Spent stripping and cleaning bath solutions from electroplating operations where cyanides are used in the process.

Quenching bath residues from oil baths from metal heat treating operations where cyanides are used in the process• spent cyanide solutions from salt bath pot cleaning from metal heat

treating operations.

Quenching wastewater treatment sludges from metal heat-treating

operations where cyanides are used in the process.
F019

F020

F02.1

F022

F023

F024

F026

F027

F028

Wastewater treatment sludges from the chemical conversion coating of

aluminum•.

Wastes (except wastewater and spent carbon from hydrogen chloride

purification) from the production or manufacturing use (as a

reactant, chemical intermediate, or component in a formulating process) of tri- or tetrachlorophenol, or of intermediates used to

produce their pesticide derivatives. (This listing does not include

wastes from the production of hexachlorophene from highly purified 2,4,S-trichlorophenol.) (See footnote 2, below.)

Wastes (except wastewater and spent carbon from hydrogen chloride

purification) from the production or manufacturing use (as a

reactant, chemical intermediate, or component in a formulating ~rocess) of pentachlorophenol, or of intermediates used to produce ~ts derivatives. (See footnote 2, below.) . Wastes (except wastewater and spent carbon from hydrogen chloride

purification) from the manufacturing use (as a reactant, chemical

intermediate, or component in a formulating process) of tetra-,

penta-, or hexachlorobenzenes under alkaline cond~tions. (See

footnote 2, below.)

Wastes (except wastewater and spent carbon from hydrogen chloride

purification) from the production of materials on equipment previously used for the production or manufacturing use (as a

reactant, chemical intermediate, or component in a formulating

process) of tri- and tetrachlorophenols. (See footnote 2, below.)

(This listing does not include wastes from equipment used only for

the production or use of hexachlorophene from highly puri.fLed

2,4,S-trichlorophenol.)

Wastes, including but not limited to, distillation residues, heavy ends, tars, and reactor cleanout wastes from the production of

chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons, having carbon content from one

to five, utilizing free radical catalyzed processes. (See footnote

1, below.) (This listing does not include light ends, spent filters

and filter aids, spent dessicants, wastewater, wastewater treatment

sludges, spent catalysts, ~nd wastes listed under specific sources,

below. )

Wastes (except wastewater and spent carbon from hydrogen chloride

purification) from the production of materials on equipment previously used for the manufacturing use (as a reactant, chemical

intermediate, or component in a formulatinC:1 process) of tetra-, J

penta-, or. hexachlorobenzene under alkal~ne conditions. (See

footnote 2, below.)

Discarded unused formulations containing tri-, tetra-, or

pentachlorophenol or discarded unused formulations containing compounds derived from these chlorophenols. (See footnote 2, below.)

(This listing does not include formulations containing hexachlorophene synthesized from prepurified 2,4,S-trichlorophenol

as the sole component.) Residues resulting from the incineration or thermal treatment of

soil contaminated with nonspecific sources wastes F020, F021, F022,

F023, F026 and F027.

o

o

o
• Specific Sources

Wood Preservation:

K001 Bottom sediment sludge from the treatment of wastewaters from wood

preserving processes that use creosote and/or pentachlorophenol.

(See footnote 1, below.)

Inorganic Pigments:

K002

K003

K004

K005

K006

K007

K008

Wastewater treatment sludge from the production of chrome yellow and

orange pigments. . Wastewater treatment sludge from the production of molybdate orange

pigments.

Wastewater treatment sludge from the production of zinc yellow

pigments.

Wastewater treatment sludge from the production of chrome green

pigments.

Wastewater treatment sludge from the production of chrome oxide

green pigments (anhydrous and hydrated)~

Wastewater treatment sludge from the production of iron blue

pigments.

Oven residue from the production of chrome oxide green pigments.

Organic Chemicals:

•

•

K009

K010

KOll

K013

KOl4

K015

K016

K017

K018

K019

K020

K021

K022

K023

K024

K025

K026

K027

K028

K029

K030

K083

K085

Distillation bottoms from the production of acetaldehyde from

ethylene.

Distillation side cuts from the production of acetaldehyde from

ethylene.

Bottom stream from the wastewater stripper in the production of

acrylonitrile • Bottom stream from the acetonitrile column in the production of

acrylonitrile.

Bottoms from the acetonitrile purification column in the production of acrylonitrile.

Still bottoms from the distillation of benzyl chloride. (See

footnote 1, below.)

Heavy ends or distillation residues from the production of carbon

tetrachloride. (See footnote 1, below.)

Heavy ends (still bottoms) from the purification column in the

production of epichlorohydrin. (See footnote 1, below.)

Heavy ends from the fractionation column in ethyl chloride

production. (See footnote 1, below.)

Heavy ends from t~e distillation of ethylene dichloride in ethylene

dichloride production. (See footnote 1, below.)

Heavy ends from the distillation of vinyl chloride in vinyl chloride

monomer production. (See footnote 1, below.)

Aqueous spent antimony catalyst waste from fluoromethanes

production.. (See footnote 1, below.) . Distillation bottom tars from the production of phenol/acetone from

cumene.

Distillation light ends from the production of phthalic anhydride

from naphthalene.

Distillation bottoms from the production of phthalic anhydride from

naphthalene.

Distillation bottoms from the production of nitrobenzene by the

nitration of benzene. Strip~ing still tails from the production of methyl ethyl ~yridines.

Centr~fuge and distillation residues from toluene di~socyanate

production.

Spent catalyst from the hydrochlorinator reactor in the production

of 1,1,1-trichloroethane. (See footnote 1, below.)

Waste from the product steam stripper in the production of

1,1,1-trichloroethane. (See footnote 1, below.)

Column bottoms or heavy ends from the combined production of

trichloroethylene and perchloroethylene. (See footnote 1, below.)

Distillation bottoms from aniline production.

Distillation of fractionation column bottoms from the production of

chlorobenzenes. (See footnote 1, below.)
Kl03

K09S

KllS

K116

,1

o

o

Distillation light ends from the production of phthalic anhydride from ortho-xylene. Distillation bottoms from the production of phthalic anhydride from

ortho-xylene.

Distillation bottoms from the production of l,l,l-trichloroethane.

(See footnote 1, below.)

Heavy ends from the heavy ends column from the production of 1,1,1-

trichloroethane (See footnote 1, below.)

Process residues from aniline extraction from the production of

aniline. . Combined wastewater streams generated from nitrobenzene/aniline

production. . Separated aqueous stream from the reactor product washing step in

the production of chlorobenzenes. (See footnote 1, below.)

Product washwaters from the production of dinitrotoluene via

nitration of toluene.

Reaction by-product water from the dryin9 column in the production of toluenediamine via'hydrogenation of d~nitrotoluene.

Condensed liquid light ends from the purification of toluenediamine

in the production of toluenediamine via hydrogenation of

dinitrotoluene.

Vicinals from the purification of toluenediamine in the production

of toluene diamine via h~dro~enation of dinitrotoluene.

Heavy ends from the purif~cat~on of toluenediamine in the production

of toluenediamine via hydrogenation of dinitrotoluene.

Organic condensate from the solvent recovery column in the

production of toluene diisocyanate via phosgenation of

toluenediamine. (See footnote 1, below.)

Explosives:

Kll4

Kl13

K044 Wastewater treatment sludges from the manufacturing and processing

of explosives. K04S Spent carbon from the treatment of wastewater containing explosives.

K046 Wastewater treatment sludges from the manufacturing, formulation and

loading of leadbased initiating compounds.

K047 Pink/red water from TNT operations.

Inorganic Chemicals:

K07l Brine purification muds from the mercury cell process in chlorine

production, where separately prepurified brine is not used.

K073 Chlorinated hydrocarbon waste from the purification step of the

diaphragm cell process using graphite anodes in chlorine production.

(See footnote 1, below.)

Kl06 Wastewater treatment sludge from the mercury cell process in

chlorine production.

Petroleum Refining:

Kll2

KlOS

KIll

Kl04

K096

K094

K093

K048 float from the petroleum refining

K049

KOSO

KOSI

,KOS2

Dissolved air flotation (DAF) industry.

Slop oil emulsion solids from the petroleum refining industry.

Heat exchanger bundle cleaning sludge from the petroleum refining

industry.

API separator sludge from the petroleum refining industry'.

Tank bottoms (leaded) from the petroleum refining industry.

Iron and Steel:

K06l Emission control dust/sludge from the primary production of steel in

electric furnaces.

K062 Spent pickle liquor' generated by steel finishing operations of

facilities within the iron and steel industry (SIC Codes 331 and

332) .

o
K03l

K032

K033

K034

K035

K036

K037

K038

K039

K040

K04l

K042

K043

K097

K098

• K099

f K123

f

f

K124

K125

K126

Kl02

K084

KlOl

•

•

Pesticides:

By~roduct salts generated in the production of MSMA and cacodylic aC1.d.

Wastewater treatment sludge from the production of chlordane. (See

footnote 3, below.)

Wastewater and scrub water from the chlorination of cyclopentadiene in the production of chlordane. (See footnote 3, below.)

Filter solids from the filtration of hexachlorocyclopentadiene in

the production of chlordane. (See footnote 3, below.)

Wastewater treatment sludges generated in the production of

creosote.

Still bottoms from toluene reclamation distillation in the

production of disulfoton.

Wastewater treatment sludges from the production of disulfoton.

Wastewater from the wash1.ng and stripping of phorate production • .(See footnote 3, below.) . Filter cake from the filtration of diethylphosphorodithioic acid in

the production of phorate. (See footnote 3, below.)

Wastewater treatment sludge from the production of phorate . (See

footnote 3, below.)

Wastewater treatment sludge from the production of toxaphene. (See

footnote 3, below.)

Heavy ends or distillation residues from the distillation of

tetrachlorobenzene in the production of 2,4,5-T. (See footnote 1,

below. )

2,6-0ichlorophenol waste from the production of 2,4-0. (See footnote

1, below.)

Vacuum stripper discharge from the chlordane chlorinator in the

production of chlordane. (See footnote 3, below.)

Untreated process wastewater from·the production of toxaphene. (See

footnote 3, below.)

Untreated wastewater from the production of 2,4-0. (See footnote 1,

below. )

Process wastewater (including supernates, filtrates, and

wastewaters) from the production of ethylenebisdithiocarbamic acid

and its salts.

Reactor vent scrubber water from the production of

ethylenebisdithiocarbamic acid and its salts.

Filtration, evaporation, and centrifugation solids from the

production of ethylenebisdithiocarbamic acid and its salts.

Baghouse dust and floor sweepings in milling and packaging operations from the production or formulation of

ethylenebisdithiocarbamic acid and its salts.

Secondary Lead:

K069 Emission control dust/sludge from secondary lead smelting.

KIOO Waste leaching solution from acid leaching of emission control

dust/sludge from secondary lead smelting.

Veterinary Pharmaceuticals:

Wastewater treatment sludges generated during the production of

veterinarr pharmaceuticals from arsenic or organo-arsenic compounds. Oistillat1.on tar residues from the distillation of aniline-based

compounds in the production of veterinary pharmaceuticals from

arsenic or organo-arsenic compounds. . Residue from the use of activated carbon for decolorization in the

production of veterinary pharmaceuticals from arsenic or

organo-arsenic compounds. .

Ink Formulation:

K086 Solvent washes and sludges, caustic washes and sludges, or water

washes and sludges from cleaning tubs and equipment used in the

formulation of ink from pigments, driers, soaps, and stabilizers

containing chromium and lead.
WAC 173-303-9903 Discarded chemical products list.

ACUTELY DANGEROUS CHEMICAL PRODUCTS o

P023

U001

U034

P002

POS7

POS8

U144

P066

U003

POOl

P002

U006

P003

U007

U008

U009

P070

P004

POOS

P006

P007

P008

P009

P119

U012

POlO

P012

POll

POll

P012

P038

U01S

P054

U010

P013

U1S7

U017

U018

U018

U094

U012

P024

U049

U093

U158

pon

P028

U019

U038

U030

U037

U190

U070

. U071

U072

U017

U223

U239

U201

U127

U056

U188

Acetaldehyde, chloroAcetaldehyde

Acetaldehyde, trichloroAcetamide, N-(aminothioxomethyl)- Acetamide, 2-fluoroAcetic acid, fluoro-, sodium salt

Acetic acid, lead salt

Acetimidic acid, N-[(Methylcarbamoyl)oxy]thio-, methyl ester

Acetonitrile

3-(alpha-Acetonyl-benzyl)-4-hydroxycoumarin and salts

1-Acetly-2-thiourea

Acetyl chloride

Acrolein

Acrylamide

Acrylic acid

Acrylonitrile

Ald carb

Aldrin

Allyl alcohol

Aluminum phosphide (R,T)

S-(Aminomethyl-3-isoxazolol

4-alpha-Aminopyridine

Ammonium picrate

Ammonium vanadate

Aniline

Arsenic acid

Arsenic (III) oxide

Arsenic (V) oxide

Arsenic pentoxide

Arsenic trioxide

Arsine, diethylAzaserine

Aziridine

Azirino(2',3':3,4)pyrrolo(1,2a)indole-4,7-dione, , -amino-8[«aminocarbonyl)oxy) methyl]-l,la,2,8,8a,8b- hexahydro-8a-methoxy-S-methyl- Barium cyanide

Benz[j]aceanthrylene, 1,2-dihydro-3-methyl- Benzal choride

Benz[a] anthracene

1,2-Benzanthracene

1,2-Benzanthracene, 7,l2-dimethyl- Benzenamine

Benzenamine, 4-chloroBenzenamine, 4-chloro-2-methylBenzenamine, ~,N-dimethyl-4-(phenylazo)­

Benzenamine, 4-4-methylenebis(2-chloro- Benzenamine, 4-nitroBenzene, (chloromethy)-

Benzene

Benzeneacetic acid,

4-chloro-alpha-(4-chlorophenyl)-alpha-hydroxy, ethyl

ester

Benzene, 1-bromo-4-phenoxy

Benzene, chloro1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid anhydride Benzene, 1,2-dichloroBenzene, 1,3-dichloroBenzene, l,4-dichloroBenzene, (dichloromethy)-

Benzene, 1,3-diisocyanatomethylBenzene, dimethyl- 1,3-Benzenediol

Benzene, hexachloroBenzene, hexahydroBenzene, hydroxyo

o
••

U220

UI05

UI06

U055

U169

U183

U185

U020

U020

U207

U023

P042

P014

U022

U021

U197

U023

U050

P028

POlS

U085

U021

U073

U095

U024

U027

P016

U246

P017

U225

U030

P018

U128

U035

U160

U053

U074

U032

P021

P123

U178

U176

Ul77

U219

PI03

U097

P022

P022

U156

U033

U211

P095

U033

U035

U036

P033

U026

P023

P024

U037

U039

U041

U042

U044

U046

U047

U048

P026

P027

U049

U032

Benze~e, methylBenzene, I-methyl-1-2, 4-dinitro

Benzene, I-methyl-2, 6-dinitroBenzene, (l,methylethyl)-

Benzene, nitroBenzene, pentachloro

Benzene, pentachloronitroBenzenesulfonic acid chloride

Benzensulfonyl chloride

Benzene, 1,2,4,5-tetrachloroBenzene, (trichloromethyl)

1,2-Benzenediol, '4-[l-hydroxy-2-(methyl-amino)ethyl]- Benzenethiol

3,4-Benzopyrene

Benzidine

p-Benzoquinone

Benzotrichloride

1,2-Benzphenanthrene

Benzyl chloride

Beryllium dust

2,2'-Bioxirane

'1,1"-Biphenyl)-4,4'-diamine

(1,1'-Biphenyl-4,4'-diamine, 3,3'-dichloro-

(1, l'-Biphenyl)-4, 4'-diamine, 3,3 '-dimethylBis(2-chloroethoxy) methane

Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether

Bix(chloromethyl) ether

Bromine cyanide

Bromoacetone

Bromoform

4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether

Brucine

1,3-Butadiene, l,1,2,3,4,4-hexachloroButanoic acid, 4 [bis(2 chloroethyl) amino] benzene

2-Butanone peroxide 2-Butenal

2-Butene, 1,4-dichloroCalcium chromate

Calcium cyanide

Camphene, octachloroCarbamic acid, methylnitroso-, ethyl ester

Carbamide, N-ethyl-N-nitrosoCarbamide, N-methyl-N-nitroso- Carbamide, thioCarbamimidoselenoic acid

Carbamoyl chloride, dimethylCarbon bisulfide

Carbon disulfide

Carbonochloridic acid, methyl ester

Carbon oxyfluoride

Carbon tetrachloride

Carbonyl chloride

Carbonyl fluoride

Chlorambucil

Chlordane, technical

Chlorine cyanide

Chlornaphazine

Chloroacetaldehyde

p-Chloroaniline

Chlorobenzene

4-Chloro-m-cresol

l-Chloro-2,3-epoxypropane

2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether

Chloroform

Chloromethyl methyl ether

beta-Chloronaphthalene

o-Chlorophenol

l-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea

3-Chloropropionitrile

4-Chlor-o-toluidine, hydrochloride

Chromic acid, calcium salt
U050

P029

U052

U052

U053

U055

P030

P031

U246

P033

U197

U056

U057

U130

U058

U240

U060

U061.

U142

U062

U133

U063

U063

U064

U064

U066

U062

U070

U07l

U072

U073

U074

U075

U060

U061

U078

U079

U025

U081

U082

U240

P036

U083

U084

P037

U085

P038

P039

U087

P041

P040

P043

P044

U092

U093

U094

U095

U096

U097

U099·

P045

P07l

P082

P046

U103

P047

P034

P048

U105

Chrysene

Copper cyanides Cresols

Cresylic acid

Crotonaldehyde

Cummene

Cyanides (soluble cyanide salts), not elsewhere specified Cyanogen

Cyanogen bromide

Cyanogen chloride

1,4-Cyclohexadienedione

Cyclohexane

Cyclohexanone

1,3-Cyclopentadiene, 1,2,3,4,5,5-hexa-chloroCyclophosphamide

2,4-D, salts and esters

DDD

DDT

Decachlorooctahydro-1,3,4-metheno~2Hcyclobuta[c,d)-pentalen-2-one Diallate

Diamine

Dibenz[a,h)anthracene

1,2:5,6-Dibenzanthracene

1,2:7,8-Dibenzopyrene

Dibenz[a,i)pyrene

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropro~ane. S-(2,3-Dichloroallyl) d~isopropylthiocarbamate

o-Dichlorobenzene

m-Dichlorobenzene

p-Dichlorobenzene

3~3'-Dichlorobenzidine

1,4-Dichloro-2-butene

Dichlorodifluoromethane

Dichloro diphenyl dichloroethane

Dichloro diphenyl trichloroethane

1,1-Dichloroethylene

1,2-Dichlorocthylene

Dichloroethyl ether

2,4-Dichlorophenol

2,6-Dichlorophenol

2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, salts and esters

Dichlorophenylarsine

1,2-Dichlbropropane

1,3-Dichloropropene

Dieldrin

1, 2:3, 4-Diepoxybutane Diethylarsine

. O,O-Diethyl S-[2-(ethylthio)ethyl) phosphorodithioate O,O-Diethyl-s-methyl-dithiophosphate

Diethrl-p-nitrophenyl phosphate O,O-D~ethyl O-pyrazenyl phosphorothioate Diisopropyl fluorophosphate Dimethoate

Dimethylamine

Dimethylaminoazobenzene

7, 12-Dimethylbenz (aJ anthracene 3,3'-Dimethylbenz~d~ne

alpha,alpha~Dimethylbenzylhydroperoxide

Dimethylcarbamoyl chloride

1,2-Dimethylhydrazine. 3,3-Dimethyl-1-(methylthio)-2-butanone,

O-[(methylamino)carbonyl) oxime

O,O-Dimethyl O-p-nitrophenyl phosphorothioate Dimethylnitrosamine

alpha, alpha-Dimethylphenethylamine Dimethyl sulfate

4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol and, salts

4,6-Dinitro-o-cyclohexylphenol

2,4-Dinitrophenol

2,4-Dinitroto~uene

ooo

-I
•••

Ul06

P020

Ul09

P03S

UllO

Ulll

P039

P049

Pl09

POSO

P088

POSI

P042

UOOI

U174

P046

U067

U076

U077

U1l4

U13l

U024

U247

U003

U02S

U184

U208

U209

U227

P084

U043

UO.42

U078

U079

U2l0

U006

PlOl

U038

U1l4

U067

U077

UllS

POS4

U076

P097

POS6

POS7

POS8

U122

P06S

U12S

U147

U12S

U126

U163

POS9

U127

U128

U129

U130

POSI

P037

Ul3l

P060

2,6-Dinitrotoluene

Dinoseb

1,2-Diphenylhydrazine

Diphosphoramide, octamethyl

Dipropylamine

Di-n-propylnitrosamine

Disulfoton

2,4-Dithiobiuret

Dithiopyrophosphoric acid, tetraethyl ester

Endosulfan

Endothall

Endrin

Epinephrine

Ethanal

Ethanamine, N-ethyl-N-nitrosoEthanamine, 1,1 -dimethyl-2-phenylEthane, 1,2-dibromoEthane, l,l-dichloroEthane, 1,2-dichloro1,2-Ethanediylbiscarbamodithioic acid

Ethane, 1,1,1,2,2,2-hexachloroEthane, l,l'~[methylenebis(oxy)] bis[2-chloroEthane, 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(p-methoxy phenyl) Ethanenitrile

Ethane, 1,l'-oxybis[2-chloro- Ethane, pentachloroEthane, 1,1,1,2-tetrachloroEthane, 1,1,2,2-TetrachloroEthane, 1,1,2-trichloroEthenamine, N-methyl-N-nitroso

Ethene, chloroEthane, 2-chloroethoxyEthene, l,l-dichloroEthene, trans-l,2-dichloroEthene, 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroEthanoyl chloride

Ethyl cyanide

Ethyl 4,4'-dichlorobenzilate

Ethylenebis(dithiocarbamic acid), salts and esters

Ethylene dibromide

Ethylene dichloride

Ethylene oxide

Ethylenimine

Ethylidene dichloride

Fa,mphur

Fluorine

Fluoroacetamide

Fluoroacetic acid, sodium salt

Formaldehyde

Fulminic acid, mercury (II) salt

2-Furancarboxaldehyde

2,S-Furandione

Furfural

Glycidylaldehyde

Guanidine, N-nitroso-N-methyl-N'nitroHeptachlor

Hexachlorobenzene

Hexachlorobutadiene

Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma isomer)

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene

1,2,3,4,lO,lO-Hexachloro-6,7-epoxy1,4,4a,S,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-endo,

endo-l,4,S,8-dimethanophthalene li 2,3,4,lO,lO-Hexachloro-6,7-epoxy1,4,4a,S,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-endo, exo1,4,S,8-dimethanonaphthalene

Hexachloroethane

1,2,3,4,lO,lO-Hexachloro-l,4,4a,S,8,8ahexahydro-l,4:S,8-endo,

endo-dimethanonaphthalene
P004

P060

'U132

U243

P062

U133

P116

U099

UI09

P068

P063

P063

P096

U135

U096

U245

P064

P007

U142

U143

U144

U129

U147

U149

U151

P092

P065

U152

U092

P016'

P112

U029

U045

U046

U068

U080

U075

U138

U211

P118

U153

U225

U121

U044

P059

U036

P066

P067

P068

P064

P069

P071

U029

U045

U156

. U226

U157

U158

U132

U068

U080

U122

U160

U138

U163

UOI0

U165

1,2,3,4, 10, 10-Hexachloro-l,4,4a, 5,8,8ahexahydro-l,4,5,8-endo,

exodimethanonaphthalene

Hexachlorohexahydro-endo, endo-dimethanonaphthalene Hexachlorophene

Hexachloropropene

Hexaethyl tetraphosphate Hydrazine

Hydrazinecarbothioamide

Hydrazine, 1,2-dimethyl- Hydrazine, 1,2-diphenyl- Hydrazine, methylHydrocyanic acid

Hydrogen cyanide

. Hydrogen phos~hide . Hydrogen sulfl.de

Hydroperoxide, 1-methyl-1-phenylethyl- Indomethacin

Isocyanic acid, methyl ester

3(2H)-Isoxazolone, 5-(aminomethy1)- Kepone

Lasiocarpine

Lead acetate

Lindane

Maleic anhrdride

Malononitr le

Mercury

Mercury, (acetato-O)phenylMercury fulminate

Methacrylonitrile

Methanamine, N-methyl- Methane, oxybis(chloro)-

Methane, tetranitroMethane, bromoMethane, chloroMethane, chloromethyoxy- Methane, dibromoMethane, dich1oroMethane, dichlorodifluoroMethane, iodo- . Methane, tetrachloro- . Methanethiol, trichloroMethanethiol

Methane, tribromo

Methane, trichlorofluoroMethane, trichloro- . 4,7-Methano-1H-indene, 1,4,5,6,7,8,8

heptachloro-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro4,7-Methanoindan, 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,8-octachloro-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro- Methomyl

2-Methylaziridine

Methyl hydrazine Methyl isocyanate

2-Methyllactonitrite

Methyl parathion

Methyl bromide

Methyl chloride

Methyl, chlorocarbonate

Methylchloroform

3-Methylcholanthrene

4,4'-Methylenebis(2-chloroaniline)

2,2'-Methylenebis(3,4,6-trichlorophenol)

Methylene bromide

Methylene chloride

Methylene oxide

Methyl ethrl ketone peroxide Methyl iodl.de

N-Methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine

MitomycinC

Naphthalene,

ooo
pentachloro2, 3, 4, 6-tetrachloro2, 4, S-trichloro2,4,6-trichloro-)

Phenol,

Phenol,

Phenol,

Phenol,

F027

F027

F027

F027

Naphthalene, 2-chlorol,4-Naphthalenedione

2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 3,3'-

[(3,3'-dimethyl-(l,l'-biphenyl)-4,4'

diyl)]-bis (azo)bis(S-amino-4-

hydroxy)-,tetrasodium salt

l,4,Naphthoquinone

l-Naphthylamine

2-Naphthylamine

alpha-Naphthylamine

beta-Naphthylamine

2-Naphthylamine, N,N'-bis(2-chloro-ethyl)-

alpha-Naphthylthiourea

Nickel carbonyl

Nickel cyanide

Nickel (II) cyanide Nickel tetracarbonyl

Nicotine and salts

Nitric oxide

p-Nitroaniline

Nitrobenzene

Nitrogen ,dioxide

Nitrogen '(II) oxide

Nitrogen (IV) oxide

Nitroglycerine

p-Nitrophenol

2-Nitropro~ane

N-Nitrosod~ethylamine

N-Nitrosodimethylamine

N-Nitroso-N-ethylurea

N-Nitroso-N-methylurea

N-Nitroso-N-methylurethane

N-Nitrosomethylvinylamine

N-Nitrosopiperidine . N-Nitroso-N-propylamine

S-Norbornene-2,3,-dimethanol,l,4,S,6,7,7-hexachloro, cyclic sulfite

Octamethylpyrophosphoramide

Osmium oxide

Osmium tetroxide

7-0xabicyclo[2.2.I]heptane-2,3-dicarboxylic acid

2H-l, 3, 2-0xazaphosphorine,2-[bis(2- . chloro- ethyl)amino]tetrahydro-,oxide 2-

Oxirane

Oxirane, 2-(chloromethyl)- Parathion

Pentachlorobenzene

Pentachloroethane

Pentachloronitrobenzene (See F027 Pentachlorophenol) Phenol

Phenol,

Phenol,

Phenol,

Phenol,

Phenol,

Phenol,

Phenol,

Phenol,

Phenol,

Phenol,

2-cyclohexyl-4,6-dinitro2,4-dinitro2-methyl-4,6 dinitro-, and salts

2,4-dinitro-6-(l-methylpropyl)-

2,4,6-trinitro-, ammonium salt

2-chloro4-chloro-3-methyl2,4-dichloro2,6-dichloro4-nitro- (See

See

See

See

Phenyl dichloroarsine

Phenylmercuric acetate

N-Phenylthoiurea

Phorate

Phosgene

Phosphine

Phosphoric acid, diethyl p-nitrophenyl ester

U047

Ul66

U236

Ul66

Ul67

Ul68

Ul67

Ul68

U026

P072

P073

P074

P074

P073

P07S

P076

»trn

Ul69

P078

P076

P078

P08l

Ul70

Ul71

Ul74

P082

Ul76

Ul77

Ul78

P084

Ul79

Ulll

POSO

P08S

P087

P087

P088

UOS8

UllS

U04l

P089

Ul83

Ul84

Ul8S

Ul88

P034

P048

P047

P020

P009

U048

U039

U08l

U082

Ul70

P036

P092

P093

P094

P09S

P096 •

P04l

•

•
P044

P043

P094

P097

P089

P040

U189

U190

U191

PllO

P098

P099

P070

U194

UllO

U066

U149

P101

P027

P079

Ul71

U027

P081

U23S

U126

P017

P102

P003

U007

U084

U243

U009

U1S2

U008.

POOS

U194

U083

P067

P102

P008

P07S

U196

U179

U191

P1ll

U201

P103

U01S

P104

P10S

P106

P107

P108

P018

P108

U13S

U103

PllS

U189

U208

U209

U210

U212

P109

PllO

Pll1

P1l2

Phosphorodithioic acid, O,O-dimethyl S-[2-(methylamino)-2-oxoethyl] ester . Phosphorofluoridic acid, bis(l-methyl-ethyl~-ester . Phosphorothiac acid, O,O-diethyl S-(ethylth1o)methyl ester

Phosphorothioic acid, O,O-dimethyl O-[p-«dimethylamino)-sulfonyl) pheny]ester Phospborothioic acid, O,O-diethyl O-(p-ni-trophenyl)ester Phosphorothioic acid, O,O-diethy1 O-pyra-zinyl ester

Phosphorus sulfide

Phthalic anhydride

2-Pico1ine

Plumbane, tetraethylPotassium cyanide Potassium s1lver cyanide

Propanal, 2-methyl-2(methylthio)-O-[(methylamino)carbonyl]oxime

1-Propanamine

1-Propanamine, N-propylPropane, 1,2-dibromo-3-chloroPropanedinitrile

Propanenitrile

Propanenitrile, 3-chloro2-hydroxy-2-methylPropane, 2-nitroPropane, 2,2'oxybis[2-chloro- 1,2,3-Propanetriol, trinitrate1-Propanol, 2,3-dibromo-, phosphate (3:1)

1-Propanol, 2,3-epoxy2-Propanone, 1-bromoPropargyl alcohol

2-Propenal

2-Propenamide

Propene, l,3-dichloro1-Propene, 1,1,2,3,3,3-hexachloro2-Propenenitrile

2-Propenenitrile, 2-methyl2-Propenoic acid

2-Propen-1-ol (See F027 Propionic acid, 2-(2,4,5-

trichlorophenoxy)-

n-Propylamine

Propylene dichloride

1,2-Propylenimine

2-Propyn-1-ol

4-Pyridinamine I

Pyr1dine, (S)-3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-, and salts

Pyridine

Pyridine, hexahydro-N-nitrosoPyridine,2-methylPyrophosphoric acid, tetraethyl ester

Resorcinol

Selenourea

L-Serine, diazoacetate (ester)

Silver cyanide (See F027 Silvex)

Sodium azide . Sodium cyanide

Strontium sulfide

Strychnidin-10-one, and salts

Strychnidin-10-one, 2,3-dimethoxy- Strychnine and salts

Sulfur hydride

Sulfuric acid, dimethyl ester

Sulfuric acid, thallium (I) salt

Sulfur phosphide (See F027 2,4,S-T

See F027 1, 2,4, S-Tetrachlorobenzene) 1,1,~,2-Tetrachloroethane

1,1,2",2-Tetrachlroethane

Tetrachloroethylene

2, 3, 4, 6-Tetrachlorophenol Tetraethyldithiopyrophosphate

Tetraethyl lead

Tetraethylpyrophosphate

Tetranitromethane

o

o

o
•

"---

•

P062

P1l3

P1l3

P1l4

PllS

P04S

P049·

U153

P014

P1l6

U219

P026 .

P072·

P093

U220,

U223

P123

U226

U227

U228

U228

P1l8.

U121

U232

U233 .

U235

U236

U237

U237

P1l9

P120 . P120 ' U043

POOl

U239

P121

P122

Tetra~hosphoric acid, hexaethyl ester

Thalll.c oxide

Thallium (III) oxide

Thallium (I) selenide

Thallium (I) sulfate

Thiofanox.

Thiomidodicarbonic diamide

Thiomethanol

Thiophenol . Thiosemicarbazide

Thiourea

Thiourea, (2-chlorophenyl)-

Thiourea, 1-naphthalenyl- Thiourea, phenylToluene

Toluene diisocyanate

Toxaphene

1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane

1,1,2-Trichloroethane

Trichloroethene

Trichloroethylene

Trichloromethanethiol

Trichloromonofluoromethane (See F027 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol

See F027 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol)

2,4,S-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid, salts and esters

2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxy-propionic acid, salts and esters

Tris(2,3-disbromopropyl) phosphate

Trypan blue

Uracil, 5[bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]-

Uracil mustard

Vanadic acid, ammonium salt

Vanadium pentoxide

Vanadium (V~ oxide

Vinyl chlor1.de

Warfarin

xrl e ne

. Z nc cyanide

Zinc phosphide
U187

U005

U112

U214

U002

U004

U005

U150

U328

U353

U011

U014

U016

U016

U014

U222

U181

U028

U069

U088

U102

U107

U203

U141

U090

U234.

U202

U120

U091

U244

U028

Ul72

U031.

U159

U031

U136

U238

U215

U051

U059

U221

U069

U192

U108

U086

U088

U089

U148

U090

U091

U098

UI01

U102

U107

U108

U117

U218

U173

U004

U112

U113

U238

U116

U117

U118

U119

U139

MODERATELY DANGEROUS CHEMICAL PRODUCTS

Acetamide, N-(4-ethoxyphenyl)-

Acetamide, N-9a-fluoren-2-yl- Acetic acid, ethyl ester

Acetic acid, thallium (I) salt

Acetone

Acetophenone

2-Acetylaminofluorene

Alanine, 3-[p-bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]phenyl-, L.

2-Amino-1-methylbenzene. 4-Amino-1-methylbenzene

Amitrole

Auramine

Benz[c]acridine

3,4-Benzacridine

Benzenamine, 4,4-carboni~idoylbis(N,N-dimethyl

Benzenamine, 2-methyl, hydrochloride, Benzenamine, 2-methyl-S-nitro

1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, ',[bis(2-ethyl-hexyl)] ester

1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, dibutyl,ester

1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, diethyl,ester

1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, dimethYl ester

1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, di-n-octyl ester

,Benzene, 1,2-methylenedioxy-4-allylBenzene, 1,2-methylenedioxy-4-propenylBenzene, 1,2-methylenedioxy-4-propylBenzene, 1,3,S-trinitro1,2-senzisothiazilin-3-one, 1, I-dioxide, and salts

Benzo[j,k]lfluorene

(1,1 '-Biphenyl)-4-'-diamine, 3,3'~ dimeth-oxyBiS(dimethylthiocarbOmOrl) disulfide

Bis(2-ethythoxyl) phth~ ate

1-Butanamine, N-butyl-N-nitrosoI-Butanol

2-Butanone

n-Butyl alcohol

Cacodylic acid

Carbamic acid, ethyl ester

Carbonic acid, dithallium (I) salt

Creosote

Daunomycin

Diaminotoluene

Dibutrl phthalate 3,5-D~chloro-N-(1,1-dimethyl-2-propynyl)benzamide

1,4-Diethylene dioxide

N,N-Diethylhydrazine

Diethyl phthalate

Diethylstilbestrol

1,2-Dihydro-3-,6-pyridizinedione

Dihydrosafrole

3,3'-Dimethoxybenzidine

1,1-Dimethylhydrazine

2,4-Dimethylphenol

Dimethyl phthalate

Di-n-octyl phthalate

l,4-Dioxane

Ethane, 1,l'-oxybisEthanethioamide

Ethanol, 2,2-(nitrosoimino)bisEthanone, 1-phenylEthyl acetate

Ethyl acrylate

Ethyl carbamate (urethan)

Ethylene thiourea

Ethyl ether

Ethyl methacrylate

Ethyl methanesulfonate

Ferric dextran

ooo
•••

U120

U123

U124

U213

U124

U206

U086·

U098

U134

U134

U136

U116

U137

U139

U140

U141

U145

U146

U148

U150

U119

. U123

U154

U155

U154

U186

U159

U161

U162

U161

U164

U059

Ul72

U173

U180

U181

U193

U182.

U186

U187

U101

U137

U145

U087

U192

U193

U140

U002

U113

U118

U162

U155

U164'

U180

U200

U202

U203

U204

U204

U205

U089

U206

U205

U213

U214

U215

U216

U217

F1uoranthene

Formic Acid

Furan

Furan, tetrahydroFurfuran . D-Glucopyranose, 2-deoxy-2(3-methyl-3-nitrosoureido)~

Hydraxine, 1,2-diethyl- Hydrazine, 1,1-dimethylHydrofluoric acid

Hydrogen fluoride

Hydroxydimethylarsine oxide

2-Imidazolidinethione

Indeno[l,2,3-cd)pyrene

Iron dextran

Isobutyl alcohol

Isosafrole

Lead phosphate

Lead subacetate

Maleic hydrazide Melphalan

Methanesulfonic acid, ethyl ester

Methanoic acid

Methanol

Methapyrilene

Methyl alcohol

1-Methylbutadiene

Methyl ethyl ketone

Methyl isobutyl ketone

Methyl methac~ylate 4 Methyl 2 pentanone

Methylthiouraci.l

5, 12-Naphthacenedione, (8S-cis)-8-

acetyl-10-[(3-amino-2,3,6-trideoxyalpha-L-lyxo-hexopyranosyl)oxrl)- 7,8,9,10-tetrahydro-6,8,11-tr~hydroxy-I-methoxy

N-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine

N-Nitrosodiethanolamine

N-Nitrosopyrrolidine

5-Nitro-o-toluidine

1,2-0xathiolane, 2,2-dioxide

Paraldehyde

1,3-Pentadiene

Phenacetin

Phenol, 2,4-dimethyl1,10-(1,2-phenylene)pyrene

Phosphoric acid, Lead salt

Phosphorodithioic acid, O,O-diethyl-,S-methyl ester

Pronamide

1,3-Propane sultone

I-Propanol, 2-methyl2-Propanone

2-Propenoic acid, ethyl ester

2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, ethyl ester

2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, methyl ester

Pyridine, 2-[(2dimethylamino) ethyl)-2-phenylamino 4 (IH)-Pyrimidinone, 2,3-dihydro-6-methyl-2-thioxopyrrole, tetrahydro-N-nitrosoReserpine

Saccharin and salts

Safrole

Selenious acid

Selenium dioxide

Selenium disulfide

4,4'-Stilbenediol, alpha,alpha'-diethylStreptozotocin

Sulfur selenide

Tetrahydrofuran

Thallium (I) acetate

Thallium (I) carbonate

Thallium (I) chloride

Thallium (I) nitrate
U218

U244

U221

U328

U3S3

U222

U011

U234

U182

U200

Thioacetamide

Thiran

Toluenediamine

o,..Toluidine

p"'Toluidine

O-Toluidine hydrochloride

1H-1,2,4-Triazol-3-amine

sym-Trinitrobenzene

1~3,S-Trioxane, 2,4,S-trimethyl- YohLmban-16-carboxylic acid, ll,17-di,.. methoxr-18-[(3,4,S-trimethO~y

benzoy )oxy]-,methyl ester .....................................................................- .

0'

a

C)
.'

•

•

COkingz

K060 Ammonia still-lime sludge from coking operations. K087 Decanter tank tar sludge from coking operations.

Footnotes

1 These wastes contain or may contain halogenated hydz.:ocarbons.

Although WAC: 173-303-082 states that these wastes are DW, WAC

173-303-070 (5), special knowledge, requires generators who know that

their waste .corrta Lne greater than one percent of these listed

halogenated hydrocarbons to designate the1r waste EHW.

2 For wastes listed with the dangerous waste numbers F020, F021, F022,

F023, F026, or F027 the quantity exclusion limit is 2.2 lbs. (1 kg)

per month or per' batch.

3 These wastes contain or may contain X Category toxic constituents.

Although WAC, 173-303-082 states that these wastes are DW, WAC

173-303-070(5), s~ci:al knowledge, requires generators who know that

their waste conta1ns greater than 0.1 percent of these listed toxic

constituents ,to designate their waste EHW •.

state Sources

WOOl The following wastes generated from the salvaging, rebuilding, or discardin~ 'of transformers or capacitors which contain

polychlor1nated biphenyls (PCB): Cooling and insulating fluids;

cores, including core papers, from unrinsed transformers and

capacitors;, transformers and capacitors which will no longer be used

for their intended use, except for those transformers or capacitors

which have been rinsed; and, rinsate from the rinsing of

transformers and'capacitors. 'For the purposes of this listing, the

rinsing of PCB containing items shall be conducted as follows:

First, the item is drained of all free flowing liquid; second, the

item is filled with solvent and allowed to stand for at least

eighteen hours; last, the item is drained thoroughly and the solvent

is collected. Solvents may include kerosene, xylene, toluene and

other solvents in which PCB are readily soluble. (Note-Certain PCB

wastes are excluded 'from this listing under WAC 173-303-071 (3)(k).

The generator should check that section to determine if his PCB

waste is excluded from'the requirements of chapter 173-303 WAC.)
WASlDNGTON DANGEROUS WASTE NuMBERS TABLE

Dangerous Waste Criteria Designation Waste Number

Toxic dangerous waste EHW WTOI

DW WT02

Pe.rsistent d!IDgerous waste

Halogenated hydrocarbons EHW WPOI

DW WP02

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons EHW WP03

Carcinogenic dangerous waste EHW WCOI

DW WC02

o

Labpack waste EHW WLOI

i DW WL02 C

Polychlorinated biphenyls <pCB> DW WOOl

o
•

•

•

APPENDIX C

i FORM EXAMPLES

Form 4

and·

Form 5
Form 4 1989 GENERATOR ANNUAL DANGEROUS WASTE REPORT PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE - B.... or Black Ink Only - (Form dlllllned lor .... on Elltl112 pllc") !Jpewrller) U.. aplclb., between ...,,, c""acllr 1989 Form 4

1. EPA/STATE HAZARDOUS WASTE

SITE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER .....-.."'-'-' - .......---.......---..---....--------'-------------------------1

ext. [[ill

[0]-[0]-[0]

[]]]]I]

[0].[0]-OJ]]

~. SITE CONTACT PERSON,

AND TITLE

PHONE NUMBER

2. COMPANY NAME

........ -' .--_ .......__.._._._-----------------------------~

7. WASHINGTON DEPT. -OF REVENUE

REGISTRATION (UBI) NUMBER

6. SITE LOCATION COUNTY

9: SITE EMPLOYMENT ON

DECEMBER 31, 1989

8. STANDARD INDUSTRIAL

CLASSIFICATION (SIC).CODES

I--,----....-----------------------------------------i

Postmarked

No laler Than

MARCH 1, 1990

SEND TO:

DEPT. OF ECOLOGY

Hazardous Waete Seclion

Attn: Annual RapOrt,

RIS Bldg. 4

Mall Stop PV-11

Olympia, WA 98504-8711 5. SITE LOCATION ADDRESS

Aael,lance 1-800-874-2022

(2061 45lHl387

DUE DATE:

PLACE THE LABEL HERE

DATE RECEIVED

Verilied__ 08t8__

BllchNo. __

Init. . Date _

Inil. _ ........ _._.. 0818. •

~._..-. r~~''-' ...._--.- Revision 0 Pages__ ,,,,1. Dat. _

'0••COLOOY UI' ONLY

'OR .COLOOY UI.·ONLY

You !!!!!m complete Sections 1 through 4

in addition to placing the label here.

1-00 not cross oul incorrecl information. ----'-_--1 4 . COMPANY MAILING ADDRESS

10. REGULATORY STATUS CERTIFICATION-Rerer 10 the instructions and the "Guide For Hazardous Waste CJ Generators" (1988 or Firat Edition) to complete this aection. Mark only one entry by placing your initials in Ihe A r-I B C r-I 0 r--I E r-1 Ib I F r--I apece provided. II none of these conditione apply to you. skip this s.ection and complete the continuation aheet(s). . L--.J. .L--.J .L--.J .L--.J ! !! S. • L--...J

11. CERTIF'CATION-I cartlf't under "'"8I1y ot law lhall have perannalty examined and am 'am,lIar with Ihelnforrnatlon aubmitted in this and .'1 attached document., end that baaed on my inquIry 0' tt'O,. tndlvidua•• tmmedialely r.spons'bJe for obtaining the in'ormation'

believe 'hat the submitted intormation is true. accurate. and complnte. lam aware that there are significant penallies 'or submitting 'al••in'ormatton. including the poaaibUhy 0' fine and impriaonment. .

--_. PmNl nn Tyr, ". ...," __._-_._-

o o o
• ----~~-----~~-~

• •

Form 4 1989 GENERATOR ANNUAL DANGEROUS WASTE REPORT 1989 Form 4

'2. YOUR EPA/STATE 1.0. NUMBER '3. RECEIVING FACILITY (lSD)

.51.'. CD ZIP: DJJJJ

,•. TRANSPORTER NAME: _

EPA/STATE1.0. NUMBER ADDRESS: -==,.---;====

City: . 51.'. CD ZIP:DJJJJ =Ci'Y:

NAME:_.... . _

ADDRESS: •__-==:-----======_

I ! , I I I ! '

EPA/STATE 1.0. NUMBER

1if1 AI iii iii OJ] I ' i ! :

A.

Menlf..t

Document

Number

15. WASTE IDENTIFICATION C.

L

,

N

E

B. Msnll..t

Shipment

Dlle

(MIA DO YY)

PIly~ic.1 i E. Ststs IChemk:.1

Slllus S-Solld I Hstu,e

L=Uquld O-Orc_

G-Sludgell=lnorpnic

M=Compr•••ed G..

F.

Waste Description (see Instructions)

G. D...gerous W..te

Number

(_InstructionS

snd WAC.173-303)

H.

Waa.e

0 ..

Ion...

lion

o-ow

E-EHW

I.

Amount

of

W••t.

J.

w K. ec ForTSO 10 FKIUty

~: UMOnI, T

J J J J J

+-++- .+.\. 1-

+++ -++.+-

I J J J J J

"I-H" -f I \ .. I

I

J J J J_.+_~_

j-+.. \ .. 1-·\ I· I

-·H-·\ I I: I

-.H-- t ··+-1· f·

H-II'II

-1-++- ~-+++-

J

'-1+1-··1·-1-1-

-++!+ \. \-

--H-+ -+1-+-

.t-H--++-+-

.--1--.---------1-..--..._.

~-+-.. ->--..t:::~J-:::t~:-.::===:::::.-- ..----.----------+---+--+--+-------+--r-t---t-i

~_t_-+__+.1. -.1-+ _ ..~-r_._.------- ~.---. ".... '" ·1· I .. I

----r-t-··--·;---1··----·--·---

1---------.-----.-- - I 1·- - -- ..--·---·--------------------t----t----t-·--l---------f--I -H

.--+ ----..----.-:::-~- -!-.1-----·-·---- :--.------t-----t---t-..--+-----t---t-t---+-i

_. ··-·1 I .. l .. ----..--.----------+-........-+---+--+------+--++-+-I

.-- f-.----- .... ----+-..-- - Iii _

~----_t_-.. -.•-•..-.f- !.. --- i..-.t:--~- ._=__.~ ----t--~--_t- I ! ; I -I-----------+-------l·----T--··· 1-·---[""··---·····-..---------..--

16. COMMENTS (Enter information by section and/or line number-see instructions).

01
1989 TSD FACILITY ANNUAL DANGEROUS WASTE REPORT 1989· FormS

,,"usE PRINT OR TYPE lIorm c1eola_ '0< ... on ED'. 112-Dlfchl lYoo.~IorI. BLUE OR BLACK INK ONLY

FACILITY NAME 2. EPA/STATE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE RECl!IYED1.

[W.A: ! LU.: ! !ill

I ! ! ! I I I I I I I I ! i ! I I I I I I I I I~ I I I I I

_.L~_..L ~~.

._--_.._-----_._---"._- ._--'.--i

3. FACILITY LOCATION ADDRESS I 4. LOCATION COUNTY

StrBBt or Description (see instructions) City State Zi

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I, ! I " I I I I " I

! n--, .~.,.--,-, I I

I· : I ; !

I i L_:

. I ; I

: ,.;I Ii I :-TTTn

5. MAILING ADDRESS FOR ANNUAL REPORT CORRESPONDENCE

Street Of P.O.Box City Stste Z'

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I! I I I I I I I IJIII I I I II I I I I I I I

-r.. '----.,-1 Irnl:_ 0"0' ____.

I I : : i :-iii. 1nII:_ 0.10'___ I

6. CONTACT I I I I I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I i I Title I I I I I I I I I I i I rTTl-fT~-1 I i I I '011:_ 0.'0' ____ ; Phone Vo,a,ed:_ 0.'0'__

81lch NWnbe'___

7. STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION (SIC) CODES 8. CLOSURE COST ESTIMATE 9. POST-CLOSURE COST ESTIMATE

I I I I I

Primerv Seconderv O'her $DJIIJID $.DJIIJID I I " I I I I I I SEND TO:

10. REGULATORY STATUS-If your facility meets any of the conditions below, 11. TOTAL WASTE IN STORAGE ON DEC. 31, 1989 DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY

you are exempt from completing page 2 of the report. WEIGHT HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION

(Check _ ."..._Ia'e box.II none.pply, co",ple'e''''re"'_.. of,... ,eport.) STORAGE METHOD AMOUNT WASTE COOE· ATTN. Annual Reports R/6 No.4

01.

Mail Stop PV-11

No regulated wastes were treated. stored, or disposed of at this site. Olympia, WA 98504-8711

0,2. All wa.te. m.naged were prOduced b)' ameli quantit)' generator•. (S01C) Container lb."e•.drum. elo.) PIlon.NUIII""..Io, Ahl.'.....:

... t ·1100-111<4·2022

03.

(SeaaoMl ToIF',,~)

All waste managed at this site was delisted or a petition approved for exemption of the (S02n Tank, above ground or (206) 459·6367 l

waste pursuant to WAC 173-303-910 before calendar )'ear 1989.

.[]4. _4 __

.-.. _· _____0

- (S02U) -Tank,underQround

The site has been closed (specif)' date: ) and

no waste management activities occurred during 1989. (S03W) Waste Pile DUE DATE:

05. Our company no longer owns or operates a business at this site and NO waste manage- (504S) Surface Impoundment Postmarked No Later Than

ment activities occurred under our ownership during 1989. MARCH 1, 1990 06. Other (Include a cover letler detailing your basle for exemption from reporling.) (8050) Other

12. CERTIFICATION I cerllty under penelty0' ,aw'hat I havepMaona'ly examined andamfamiliar withtha InformatiOn aubmilted in',hiaanda/l attached documenta. and'hat ba.ed onmy inquiry ot 'hoseindlviduela immediately responalb/e for ob'eininl1 'he information. I belleVB fllatthe aubmitted Informalion ia true. ecclHate. andcomplete. lem eware 'hat there areaignil/can'penaltiea for aubmitting fa'aeinformation. including 'hepoaaibllity of fineandimpriaonment.

, I Page I of I PRINT OR TYPE NAME SIGNATURE DATE _D . -- ... ~- .

o 0 o
•

- - --------- ----

• •

1989 TSD FACILITY ANNUAL DANGEROUS WASTE REPORT 1989 Form 5

13. YOUR EPA/STATE HAZARDOUS WASTE 14. GENERATOR'S EPA/STATE 1.0. NUMBER NAME:

IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1.0. HUMBER ADDRESS: MJJIIIIlJJ] = CITY: STATE: OJ ZIP:CIIII:'IDIIJ

15. WASTE IDENTIFICAliON c. D. E. K.

S Phy'" Chemical G. H. L

I A. B. I SIal. Nata.. HandUng ..._ Dangerous Deolg

I.Wnt. .... A_

J.

....I ~c S=Solld F. _Contalnm.nt W.... 10

N Menlt••t D.I. a L=L1q"ld 0=01&_ Waste Description (see Instructiona) y...., Numba' tIon ot ,d Docum.nl Shlpm.nt I E I-Inorpnit O-DW Q-Sludg• i...-In.lnlc:tIon.) (... In.lructlon., W,.t. Numba, Aac.lyad .. E-EHW •• • M·Compr....d Gal •

!--I--j ... j-.++-rl- II - .. 1..++- -------------- I I I I I

,-- I

-- I I I I I I I I I , 1- f--++-+-

-+-+ : I I I

I I.' 1--++-- -+H-

,--_._---_.

-+++- +++--+--1-+'" -+4--+- - I I I I I I

I I 1++_ +-1+ I I I I I I I

I I I 1-1---1++ --- -- ._-_. --- ... _...... . ._..-. -_._ ...~.

+--t + -l--j-f- --1-+-1· --I-t·j- ._.._-- --- . _......__.. .- -.-.... ",-_ .. ..... - .... .. -- .._.......- ••• w __•

-/..++ --+-+---1- +++ I I I

f-- ..- -------- _..__._--f------------ ------.-.--

+++- 1-+-+-+--+-1---+' '-H-I-

--._---- _._-- -_._._-- ._-_._--- - -_.- ._......_--. . ----._.- -_... _-.-._-'- ._---

t II I I I

-- e----- ------ -~ _.,---_.r---...----...- . --_.._.._- -----_._-- .---- -_.._--

.., f l- I \ 1--\ --I ,.\ -j-l-I--

I I I

I I I I I I I I

---_._-- ----._--+._-_..__.__....._--- ---

I

I II ++\-- -+ I I +-1 -j ._---

+--H--- -+-H-H-'I--+-' -! ++

16. COMMENTS (Enter information by section and/or line number-see instructions).

IPAllA nl

'"'' ... ," n., '"'''' I" ,.,., - -_._-- ------~ . -- .---- ._...... .--- .. ".'
GLOSSARY

Acutely hazardous waste: A small subset of dangerous waste originated by USEPA under RCRA. A

waste is determined to be "acutely hazardous waste" if it is defined as such under WAC 173-3034W.

Acutely hazardous wastes are: discarded chemical products (WAC 173-303-9903) that are identified with

a dangerous waste number beginning with a "P" or that show an "X"or "A" in the reason for designation

column, or waste numbers F020, F021, F022; F023, F026, or F027.

Dangerous waste: Materials that first meet the definition of a solid waste under WAC 173-303-016that

are designated as.dangerous waste using the procedures described under WAC 173-303-070.

Dangerous waste regulations: Chapter 173-303 of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC).

EPA/State site identification number (ID#): Site-specific identifier:assigned by Ecology and USEPA to

each dangerous waste generator, transporter, and treatment/storage/disposal (fSD) facility.

Extremely hazardous waste (EIIW): A subset of dangerous waste originally created by Ecology to

define wastes that are extremely hazardous because of "persistence, bioconcentration or genetic effects,

extreme toxicity, or because such quantities present an extreme hazard to man or wildlife". A waste is

designated as EHW under each section of the designation procedures ,WAC 173-303-080 through -103.

Generator: Any person, by site, whose act or process produces dangerous waste or whose act first

causes a dangerous waste to be subject to regulation.

"

G

'

Household

household that exhibits characteristics of ignitibility,

hazardous waste: Any substance, regardless

corrosivity,

of quantity, which is used or generated by the

reactivity, or toxicity, as defined in the C

Dangerous Waste Regulations.

Large quantity generator (LQG)::GeneratOr or accumulator of more than 2,200 pounds of dangerous

waste or 2.2 pounds of acutely hazardous waste.

Medium quantity generator (MQG): Generator or accumulator ofmore than 220, but less than 2,200

pounds of dangerous waste. This corresponds to the Federal definition of small quantity generators.

,On-site management facility: A facility that manages its own dangerous waste under interim status or a

RCRA treatment/storage/disposal permit.

Permit-by-rule: A provision of the Dangerous Waste Regulations which states that a facility .or activity

is deemed to have the equivalent of a management permit if it meets the requirements of the provisions of

WAC 173-303-802. '

Quantity exclusion limit (QEL): A specific quantity of waste generated per month or batch for each

dangerous waste which determines if a generator is subject only to the small quantity generator (SQG)

provisions or fully subject to the Dangerous Waste Regulations

Radioactive mixed waste: Designated dangerous waste which'also contains levels of radioactivity.

RCRA: The Federal law governing hazardous waste -- Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 0

1976.

42
•

•

•

RCRA waste: Wastes regulated in Washington that are hazardous under 40 CFR Part 261.

Recurrent waste: The generation of dangerous waste from continuous or frequently occurring processes

or events, such as industrial production processes.

Treatment/storage/disposal facility (TSD): Treatment, storage, and/or storage facility having either

interim status or permitted status under 40 CFR Part 261.

Wastewater: Dangerous waste, usually mixed with large volumes of water, that is treated and rendered

non-dangerous prior to discharge .