alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Montana Twentieth Judicial District Court. County of Lake.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- KEITH CHARLES BAYLOR, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-04-102

DECISION

*65Done in open Court this 4th day of August, 2016.

DATED this 24th day of August, 2016.

On March 16, 2016, the Defendant’s suspended sentence was revoked for violation of the conditions of his probation and he was sentenced to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of two and a half (2 1⁄2) years, with no time suspended, for the offense of Burglary, a Felony, as specified in §45-6-204(1), MCA. The Sentence was ordered to run consecutive to the sentence in DC-03-141. The Court recommended that the Defendant be screened for START, Connection Corrections, or any treatment programs deemed appropriate by the Department of Corrections.

On August 4, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant appeared by Vision Net from the Missoula Probation and Parole office and was represented by Joshua Hotchkiss, a legal intern with the Office of the State Public Defender, under the supervision of Brent Getty. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member and Hon. Brad Newman, Member.
# C_2016089EN.01000603.xml

| 5.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/6

---

Adoption of Commission Decision on the notification by Romania of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32(6) of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions

(2016/C 89/09)

On 3 March 2016, the Commission adopted Decision C(2016) 1249 on the notification by Romania of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32(6) of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (1).

1

This document is available on the following internet site: https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/36205e98-8e7a-47d7-808d-931bc5baf6ee

---

(1)  OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1750-1751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-412]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 11602 and <greek-i> 11603]


Missouri Disaster <greek-i> MO-00034

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Missouri (FEMA-
1809-DR), dated 11/13/2008.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, and a Tornado.
    Incident Period: 09/11/2008 through 09/24/2008.
    Effective Date: 11/13/2008.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/12/2009.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 08/13/2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road,Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 11/13/2008, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.

[[Page 1751]]

    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Adair, Audrain, Barry, Bollinger, Butler, Callaway, 
Cape Girardeau, Carter, Chariton, Christian, Clark, Crawford,Douglas, 
Dunklin, Howard, Howell,Knox, Lewis, Lincoln, Linn,Madison, Maries, 
Marion, Miller,Mississippi, New Madrid, Oregon, Ozark,Perry, Ralls, 
Randolph, Ray,Reynolds, Ripley, Sainte Genevieve, Schuyler,Scotland, 
Scott, Shannon, Shelby,Stoddard, Stone, Sullivan, Taney,Texas, Wayne, 
Webster, Wright.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit             5.250
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11602B 
and for economic injury is 11603B.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-412 Filed 1-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-2035

SALLY HEYNS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.; JP MORGAN CHASE BANK; DOES 

1 TO 50, Inclusive,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, Senior District Judge. (1:18-cv-01429-TSE-MSN)

Submitted: December 17, 2019 Decided: December 19, 2019

Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sally Heyns, Appellant Pro Se. John Alexander Nader, MCGLINCHEY STAFFORD, 

PLLC, Washington, D.C.; Donald Richard Pocock, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & 

SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Sally Heyns seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing her amended civil 

complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2012).

*

 The court’s order 

allowed Heyns leave to amend the complaint and explained that it would be her last

opportunity to do so.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), 

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). Because the 

district court’s order explicitly allowed Heyns to amend her complaint to potentially cure 

the defects identified, the order she seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable 

interlocutory or collateral order. See Goode, 807 F.3d at 623-25, 628-30. Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to the district court to allow 

Heyns to file a second amended complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED AND REMANDED

 * The district court previously dismissed Heyns’ original complaint without 

prejudice, pursuant to § 1915(e), and we dismissed Heyns’ appeal of that order for lack of 

jurisdiction. Heyns v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., 764 F. App’x 341, 342 (4th Cir.

2019) (No. 19-1075) (citing Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, 807 F.3d 619, 623-25, 

628-30 (4th Cir. 2015)).
No. 11-6231.

#### Joseph M. Williams, Petitioner v. City of Natchitoches, Louisiana, et al.

565 U.S. 1037, 132 S. Ct. 579,

181 L. Ed. 2d 426,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8228,

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 09-8015.

#### Leopoldo Aguado-Guel, Petitioner v. Deputy Larkin, et al.

559 U.S. 948, 130 S. Ct. 1526,

176 L. Ed. 2d 128,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1240.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
12 October 2012 *************************

NSN: 8940-01-375-4375 (CAM) *MONOGRAPH NO: M2K*

*************************

Item: Chili and Macaroni

Document: PCR-C-027, Chili and Macaroni, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 220 Component Classification: PRIMARY

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Uniform mixture of cooked ground beef and elbow macaroni in a tomato-based sauce 

seasoned with a chili spice blend.

Ground Beef: Brown cooked beef color.

Macaroni: Off-white to light tan color.

Sauce: Reddish-brown color. 

Odor: Cooked chili and macaroni in a chili spice blend tomato-based sauce. 

Flavor: Cooked chili and macaroni in a chili spice blend tomato-based sauce. . 

Texture:

Ground beef: Moist and tender.

Macaroni: Slightly soft to slightly firm and not pasty.

Sauce: Moderately thick. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Sauce: Moderately darkened, excessively oiling off of fat, excessively thin or thick.

Macaroni: Extremely soft or mushy.

Odor: Rancid, sour.

Flavor: Bitter, rancid, sour, lack of spice and tomato flavor. 

Texture: Sauce: Excessively thick or thin.

Macaroni: Excessively soft or mushy. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

 

Special Notes
12 October 2012 *************************

NSN: 8940-01-375-4375 (CAM) *MONOGRAPH NO: M2K*

*************************

Pasta that has a soft texture is characteristic of this item just as it is with commercially produced canned 

pasta products.
No. 09-7874.

#### Joseph Bishop Goff, Petitioner v. Mississippi.

559 U.S. 944, 130 S. Ct. 1513,

176 L. Ed. 2d 122,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1251.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.

Same case below, 14 So. 3d 625.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Home Interiors & Gifts, Inc. (the
Registrant);
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report;
 4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and
15d-15e) for the Registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls or
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report based on such evaluation;c)
    
    Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ MICHAEL D. LOHNERMichael D. LohnerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 16

- 3826

_____________________________ C HRISTA G. H ARTLEY , Appellant,

v.

B ANK O F A MERICA , N. A
., a s successor by m erger t o BAC Home Loans Servicing, L. P

. , Appellee.

___ __________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County

. John F. Simon
, Jr., Judge

.

June 5, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J., and B ILBREY and J AY , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until d isposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Sharon Delene Regan, Pensacola; and Gregory B. Wilhelm of Baybridge Law Firm, P.L.L.C., Gulf Breeze
, for Appellant.

Jason F. Joseph of Gla dstone Law Group, P.A., Boca Raton
, for Appellee.
ITEM: Snack Bread, Fortified (SNB) MONOGRAPH NO.: KC8

VENDOR: Sterling Bakery

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE: 180 Kilocalories

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: The fortified snack bread shall be flat and shall be intact. The surface shall

ODOR:

FLAVOR:

TEXTURE:

have docker holes and may be slightly uneven. The color shall be
off-white. The interior crumb shall be a paler color than the exterior
surface. A slight green hue (caused by fortification) is acceptable.

The odor shall be charateristic of bread.

The fortified snack bread shall have a slightly sweet, mild wheat flavor,
and may have a slight leavening and/or mineral aftertaste.

The fortified snack bread shall be moderately moist, and have a biscuit-like
crumb.

DEFECTS LIKELY TO OCCUR:

APPERANCE: Excessively dark

ODOR.

FLAVOR:

TEXTURE:

Burnt odor, rancidity, and overpowering mineral odor.
Rancid flavor, burnt or scorched flavor, overpowering mineral flavor

Excessively dry, or soggy

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: When the package is first opened the

product should be smelled for off-odors, Odors that dissipate rapidly (i.e., musty, yeasty, slightly
rancid) should be noted but not scored as a surveillance defect provided no other condition factor
such as off-taste is also noted.

SPECIAL NOTES: Serviceability of the cookie is considered significantly affected when more
than 25% of the product’s volume is crushed or reduced to crumbs.
**DLA TROOP SUPPORT (SUBSISTENCE) PROGRAMS CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY**

**This short survey is a tool to help measure the overall success of DLA Troop Support’s Subsistence Programs.  It is not to replace your normal communications with your DLA Troop Support contact point or your Prime Vendor representatives.  Please take the time to respond to the following questions so we can ensure that our Subsistence support stays on track and meets the needs of you, our valued customer.  Please respond by _____________to_____________________**

**FACILITY NAME: ________________________________________DODAAC:___________________POC:_____________________________________**

**Email ________________________________     TIME IN CURRENT JOB______________   NUMBER FED PER MEAL: _____________   DATE COMPLETED_______________**

**RESPONDENT’S TITLE:  (Circle One)          Dining Facility Manager     Food Service Manager     Ordering Manager     Installation Food Advisor     Chief Nutritionist    Other**

****

**Please enter the number for each question using the most appropriate scale description:**

**Excellent                             Very Good                                         Acceptable                                                  Poor                                      Unacceptable                             Not-Applicable**

**No Problems              Problems occur rarely                 Problems occur occasionally                    Problems occur frequently           Problems occur daily                      ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________**

**5                                          4                                                           3                                                                    2                                                1                                                N/A**

****
# C_2016058EN.01000801.xml

| 13.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/8

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2016/C 58/07)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Certain fatty alcohols and their blends | India
  Indonesia
  Malaysia | Anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1138/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain fatty alcohols and their blends originating in India, Indonesia and Malaysia (OJ L 293, 11.11.2011, p. 1). | 12.11.2016 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Certain fatty alcohols and their blends

India

Indonesia

Malaysia

Anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1138/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain fatty alcohols and their blends originating in India, Indonesia and Malaysia (OJ L 293, 11.11.2011, p. 1).

12.11.2016

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $9.29 CWT 0.965 $8.9649

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.5370 LB 3.5 $8.8795

Class I Price $17.8444

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $8.87 CWT 0.965 $8.5596

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.6555 LB 3.5 $9.2943

Class I Price $17.8538

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT ($0.0095)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.0008)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.0004)

Price change per quart ($0.0002)

Price change per pint ($0.0001)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.0001)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.0001)

Price change per half pint ($0.0001)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.00)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.00)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.00)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.00)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.00)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.00)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.00)

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: Oct 6, 2019
11 December 2013 **************************

NSN: 8940-01-525-3549 (SFC) * MONOGRAPH NO: M6M

 ************************* 

Item: Baked snack crackers, Cheddar cheese (Type V, Flavor 1)

Document: A-A-20195, Snack Foods and PKG&QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 235 Component Classification: Primary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Light to medium orange with perforated edges around the wafer, raised “air baked”, 

symmetrical 3/4 to 1-1/4 inch (1.9 - 3.2 cm).

Odor: Baked wheat cracker; fresh, tangy, dehydrated cheddar cheese.

Flavor: Baked wheat cracker; fresh, tangy, dehydrated cheddar cheese.

Texture: Firm, crispy.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Crushed, broken; darkening of exterior.

Odor: Rancid, oxidized, stale, scorched.

Flavor: Rancid, oxidized, stale, scorched.

Texture: Slightly soft to soft or extremely hard.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

Serviceability is significantly affected if more than 30 percent of crackers are broken per pouch. This 

product should contain an oxygen scavenger. If defects such as oxidized or rancid odors or flavors 

exist, they are likely due to package failure or the absence of an oxygen scavenger.
No. 09-6598.

#### Alex Joe Hernandez, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 941, 130 S. Ct. 1501,

176 L. Ed. 2d 117,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1367.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 568 F.3d 827.
No. 11-184.

#### Carolyn M. Kloeckner, Petitioner v. Hilda L. Solis, Secretary of Labor.

565 U.S. 1152, 132 S. Ct. 1088,

181 L. Ed. 2d 805,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 583.

January 13, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted.

*806Same case below, 639 F.3d 834.