alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") by R.A.B. Holdings, Inc., a
Delaware corporation ("Holdings"), and R.A.B. Enterprises, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("Enterprises" and, together with Holdings, the "Registrant"), each
of the undersigned hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition, results of
                  operations and cash flows of the Registrant for the quarter
                  ended September 30, 2003.



                                                        R.A.B. HOLDINGS, INC.



November 13, 2003                                       /s/ Steven M. Grossman
                                                        ----------------------
                                                        Steven M. Grossman
                                                        Chief Financial Officer




                                                        R.A.B. ENTERPRISES, INC.



November 13, 2003                                       /s/ Steven M. Grossman
                                                        ----------------------
                                                        Steven M. Grossman
                                                        Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant, and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 11-7620.

#### William C. Thornton, Petitioner v. California.

565 U.S. 1181, 132 S. Ct. 1151,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1024,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 956.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
29 February 2016 *********************

NSN: 8940-00-149-1059 (CSP) * MONOGRAPH M6L

 ********************* 

Item: Cheese Spread, Cheddar, Fortified, Plain

Document: PCR-C-039, Cheese Spread, Cheddar, Fortified, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf 

Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 114 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

No evidence of excessive heating (materially darkened or scorched), mottling curdling, 

or oiling off. Smooth, homogenous, slightly plastic, light yellow-orange color 

(between No. 6 and No. 10 of National Cheese Institute Color Standard), and a uniform 

surface sheen. Free from foreign materials. No evidence of emulsion separation.

Odor: Slight bitterness from the medium cured cheese. Free from foreign odors. Medium 

cured cheddar and cooked milk.

Flavor: Slight bitterness from the medium cured cheese. Free from foreign flavors. Medium

cheddar, salty, slightly buttery.

Texture: Smooth, homogenous, and easily spreadable. Not grainy.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Excessive darkening, scorched, mottled, curdled, or excessive oiliness. 

Odor: Old cheddar, scorched milk, sour.

Flavor: Bitter, overcooked/scorched milk, slight metallic, acidic/sour.

Texture: Curdled, grainy, rubbery, excessively thick or excessively oily (oiled off).

Unique Examination/Test Procedures:

Package must be kneaded prior to opening for examination of this product. If mold growth is observed, 

examine the package closely for holes, cuts and tears, especially at the juncture of the product edge of 

the seals and the body of the pouch. If pouch integrity is compromised, score the pouch defect and note 

findings in the narrative (evidence of mold, desiccation, dark color, etc.).

Special Notes:
No. 09-682.

#### Leonard Bosack, et al., Petitioners v. David C. Soward, et al.

559 U.S. 938, 130 S. Ct. 1522,

176 L. Ed. 2d 113,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1298.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 586 F.3d 1096.
No. 11-439.

#### Donald McKinley, et al., Petitioners v. Greg Abbott, Attorney General of Texas.

565 U.S. 1079, 132 S. Ct. 825,

181 L. Ed. 2d 527,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8719.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 643 F.3d 403.
No. 11-7450.

#### Jerome Clarke, Petitioner v. Sharon Lewis, et al.

565 U.S. 1166, 132 S. Ct. 1113,

181 L. Ed. 2d 995,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 765.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 11-7843.

#### Kenneth Lee Green, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1171, 132 S. Ct. 1127,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1004,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 626.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 446 Fed. Appx. 199.
Montana Thirteenth Judicial District Court. County of Yellowstone.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- AARON WADE MONTOYA, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-13-341

DECISION

On April 12, 2016, the Defendant’s suspended sentence was revoked for violation of the conditions of his probation and he was sentenced to the Montana State Prison for five (5) years for the offense of Count I: Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs, a Felony, in violation of §45-9-102, MCA. In all other respects, the previous Orders, conditions, and reasons of the Court entered on July 7, 2014, were ordered to remain unchanged and were recommended. The Defendant was granted credit for pre-trial incarceration time served from February 26, 2015 through March 1, 2015, April 1, 2015 through April 29, 2015, May 9, 2016 through May 14, 2015, June 25, 2015 through July 6, 2015 and September 5, 2015 through September 12, 2015 On August 4, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Abigail Coburn, a legal intern with the Office of the State Public Defender, under the supervision of Brent Getty. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of *78Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

Done in open Court this 4th day of August, 2016.

DATED this 24th day of August, 2016.

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member and Hon. Brad Newman, Member.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 1601 V

UNPUBLISHED

SILVIA STITT

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: January 5, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration (SIRVA)

Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA , for petitioner.

Darryl R. Wishard , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On October 15, 2019

, Silvia Stitt filed a petition for compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. 2 (the

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that an influenza ( “ fl u ” ) vaccination that she received in

her left arm on O ctober 3, 2017 caused a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration (SIRVA) . Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing

Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On January 5, 2021

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at

1. Specifically, it is R espondent ’ s position that Pet itioner ’ s alleged injury is consistent with

S IRVA of the left arm and that it meets the requirements of a Table injury claim for SIRVA.

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

(2012 ).2 Id. at 4 . Respondent further agrees that there are no other causes for Pet itioner ’ s left arm

injury and that she suffered the sequela of this injury for more than six months

. Id.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
Montana First Judicial District Court. County of Lewis and Clark.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- JUSTIN GALE WALKER, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-14-273

DECISION

On October 29, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a commitment to the Montana State Prison for a period of ten (10) years for the offense of Count I: Criminal Endangerment, a Felony, in violation of §45-5-207, MCA. The defendant shall not be parole eligible for ten (10) years. The defendant is granted credit for time served prior to sentencing for the time period of June 22, 2014 - October 29, 2015. The foregoing sentence shall run consecutively to the sentence imposed upon the defendant in Cause No. DC-14-4, Montana Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County.

On February 4, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Jennifer Streano of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

*20Done in open Court this 4th day of February, 2016.

DATED this 29th day of February, 2016.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. John Warner, Member.
Sunvalley Solar Inc.


Tel: 909.598.0618• Fax:909.598.6633 •
www.sunvalleysolarinc.com • 398 Lemon Creek Drive, Ste A. Walnut, CA 91789


 


Date: 2/24/2012


 


Private Loan Agreement


 


Due to the rapid business development,
the Company needs funds for operation and inventory purchase. The Board of Directors authorize James Zhang (CEO/Chairman) on behalf
of the Company, to sign a short term loan agreement with Hangbo Yu (Shareholder/General Manager). The loan amount is $21,307.90.
The start day will be the day that $21,307.90 is transferred to the Company's account. The annual interest for this short-term
loan is $6.50% and the ten of this loan should be less than a year.


 


Borrower:


 


/s/ James Zhang


James Zhang


CEO


 


Sunvalley Solar Inc.


 


 


Lender:


 


/s/ Hang Bo Yu


Hang Bo Yu
#### Matter of N.W., YINC

2016 MT 320N

DA 16-0049

12/06/16

Affirmed

Dist. 3 (Deer Lodge)
exh10-37.htm










EXHIBIT 10.37







People’s Republic of China


Mining permits


(copy)


Permit#: 3707821111001


Ownership of mining right: Zhucheng City Ziyang Ceramic Co., Ltd.


Address: Zhucheng city, Huang Hua Town Zhu Pan San Village


Mine Name: Zhu Pan San Village Clay Quarry


Economic Type: private enterprises


Minerals to be mined:


Mining method:  Open-pit mining


Production scale:


Mining area: 133200 square meters


Term: 8 years from 2011/11/01 to 2019/10/31







Stamped by Zhucheng City Office of Mineral Resources Management


Mining Registration Seal


2011/11/02


 


Printed by the Ministry of Land Resources of the People’s Republic of China







Mining area inflection point coordinates:


X                                Y


A: 3973541                                20734358


B: 3973544                                20734205


C: 3973738                                20734209


D: 3973735                                20734355












Mining depth: 19 Meters
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4774 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4774

 To amend the Clean Air Act to require that, after the year 2012, all 
  gasoline sold to consumers in the United States for motor vehicles 
contain not less than 10 percent renewable fuel and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2006

Mr. Upton (for himself, Mr. Doyle, Mr. Holden, Mr. Gillmor, Mr. Schwarz 
of Michigan, Mr. Leach, Mr. Bass, Mr. Ehlers, Mr. Coble, Mr. Gilchrest, 
 and Mr. Kildee) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Clean Air Act to require that, after the year 2012, all 
  gasoline sold to consumers in the United States for motor vehicles 
contain not less than 10 percent renewable fuel and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 10 PERCENT RENEWABLE FUEL REQUIREMENT.

    Section 211 (o) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(o)) is amended 
by adding the following new paragraph at the end thereof:
            ``(13) 10 percent retail renewable fuel requirement.--Not 
        later than 1 year after the enactment of this paragraph, the 
        Administrator shall promulgate regulations under this section 
        requiring that, after December 31, 2012, all gasoline motor 
        vehicle fuel sold or dispensed to consumers in the contiguous 
        United States, on an annual average basis, contain not less 
        than 10 percent renewable fuel (as defined in paragraph (1) of 
        this subsection).''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 09-8307.

#### Learonardo Truss, Petitioner v. Willie Thomas, Warden, et al.

559 U.S. 980, 130 S. Ct. 1705,

176 L. Ed. 2d 194,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2172,

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           7,230
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,211
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,021
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,370
<PP&E>                                          12,327
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,006)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,540
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,187
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,890
<SALES>                                         97,590
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,590
<CGS>                                           70,657
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 217
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,173
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,079
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,094
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,094
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32


</TABLE>
No. 11-403.

#### Joel W. Green, Petitioner v. United States, et al.

565 U.S. 1079, 132 S. Ct. 817,

181 L. Ed. 2d 526,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8750.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 862.
No. 09-8540.

#### Alejandro Diaz-Gutierrez, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 959, 130 S. Ct. 1560,

176 L. Ed. 2d 147,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1461.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 354 Fed. Appx. 774.
No. 11-7445.

#### Robert Schmidt, et ux., Petitioners v. New Century Mortgage Corporation, et al.

565 U.S. 1155, 132 S. Ct. 1134,

181 L. Ed. 2d 975,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 736.

January 17, 2012.

Motion of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioners allowed until February 7, 2012, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4408]

[[Page 9292]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,187]

Hallmark Cards, Inc., Kansas City, MO; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 10, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed on behalf of the workers at Hallmark Cards, Inc., Kansas 
City, Missouri.
    The petition regarding the investigation has been deemed invalid 
because the petitioners were not employed by the firm indicated on the 
petition. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of February 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-4408 Filed 3-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```
Montana Twelfth Judicial District Court. County of Hill.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- SUSAN MARIE MAGERA, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-09-091

DECISION

On November 30, 2015, the Defendant’s suspended sentence was revoked and she was sentenced to the Department of Corrections for a period of two (2) years, for the offense of Criminal Distribution of Dangerous Drugs, a Felony. The Court recommended the Department of Corrections screen Defendant for *27placement in an appropriate treatment facility to address Defendant’s serious mental health issues as well as her chemical dependency issues. Defendant was ordered to pay all fines, costs, fees, and any other financial obligations ordered by the sentencing court in the original Judgment entered July 15, 2010. Defendant received credit for thirty-two (32) days previously served. Defendant did not receive any credit for street time. The sentence in DC-09-091 was ordered to run concurrently with the sentences in DC-09-092, DC-09-093, and DC-09-108.

Done in open Court this 8th day of April, 2016.

DATED this 3rd day of May, 2016.

On April 8, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Peter Ohman, of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member and Hon. Brad Newman, Member.
No. 09-7837.

#### Dave Beck, Petitioner v. Victor Walker, Warden.

559 U.S. 943, 130 S. Ct. 1510,

176 L. Ed. 2d 121,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1305.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 11-8018.

#### Robert Joos, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1184, 132 S. Ct. 1159,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 978.

181 L. Ed. 2d 1030,

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 638 F.3d 581.