alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 09-8468.

#### Guillermo Orduno, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 957, 130 S. Ct. 1554,

176 L. Ed. 2d 143,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1234.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 343 Fed. Appx. 144.
No. 09-7307.

#### Robert J. Zani, Petitioner v. Social Security Administration.

559 U.S. 969, 130 S. Ct. 1730,

176 L. Ed. 2d 178,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2048.

March 1, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of AKI, Inc. and AKI Holding Corp.
(collectively,  the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending  September 30,
2002 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I,  Kenneth  Budde,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.


/s/ Kenneth A. Budde
-----------------------
Kenneth A. Budde
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2002
No. 11-7648.

#### James Stevenson, Petitioner v. New York Department of Correctional Services.

565 U.S. 1168, 132 S. Ct. 1137,

181 L. Ed. 2d 998,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 829.

January 17, 2012.

Ppetition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 43 (Friday, March 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4530]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5280-N-08]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.
    Effective Date: March 6, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street SW., Room 7262, Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: February 26, 2009.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
 [FR Doc. E9-4530 Filed 3-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S (1) CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND (II)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTAINED IN THE FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       10,021,000
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                20,450,000<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                   5,230,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             38,676,000
<PP&E>                                      181,746,000<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              243,388,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        15,617,000
<BONDS>                                      99,300,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        14,761,000
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         45,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   48,667,000<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                243,388,000
<SALES>                                      84,534,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             84,534,000
<CGS>                                        73,636,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                73,636,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              2,535,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            4,612,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               4,438,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    903,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           3,535,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                  3,535,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0<F4>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0<F4>
<FN>
<F1>Amount represents net accounts receivable.
<F2>Amount represents net property, plant, and equipment.
<F3>Amount represents additional paid in capital and retained earnings.
<F4>Only required for public equity offerings.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.37

 

Titan Machinery Inc. Fiscal 2013 Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan

 

Each non-employee director of Titan Machinery Inc. shall receive:

 

·                  an annual cash retainer of $50,000;

·                  an annual grant of $50,000 worth of restricted stock on the first trading day of the second month of the second quarter (1) (per the terms of the Company’s equity awards grant policy) which provides for the lapse of restrictions on the first anniversary of the date of grant;

·                  an additional retainer of $15,000 for the Audit Committee Chair;

·                  an additional retainer of $5,000 to each of the Chairs of the Governance and Compensation Committees and the lead independent director; and

·                  reimbursement of reasonable expenses incurred in connection with their services as directors.

 




(1)  The fair market value of the Company’s common stock shall be equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq stock market on the date of determination, or if such date is not a trading date on the Nasdaq Global Select market, the nearest preceding trading date.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R ECONSIDERATION E N B ANC

Appellate case name: Thomas Wayne Florence v

. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 11

- 00822

- CR

Trial court case numb er: 10CR1217

Trial court: 56th District Court of Galveston County

Date motion filed: August 16, 2013

Party filing motion: appellant, Thomas Wayne Florence

It is ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is DENIED

.

Judg e’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

Acting for the Court

The en banc court consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland,

Sharp, Massengale, and Brown.

Date: November 26 , 2013
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4653 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2006 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To repeal a prohibition on the use of certain funds for 

tunneling in certain areas with respect to the Los Angeles to San Fernando Valley Metro Rail project, California. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

HR 4653 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROHIBITION. 

2 The second sentence of section 321 of the Depart3 ment of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropria4 tions Act, 1986 (99 Stat. 1287) is repealed. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 20, 

2006. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
No. 11-7943.

#### Robert Lindsey, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1183, 132 S. Ct. 1156,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1027,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 991.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice concerning the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a class of employees at the Mallinckrodt Chemical Co., Destrehan Street Plant in St. Louis, Missouri, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On January 16, 2009, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

All employees of DOE, its predecessor agencies, and their contractors and subcontractors who worked in the Uranium Division at the Mallinckrodt Chemical Co., Destrehan Street Plant in St. Louis, Missouri, from January 1, 1958 to December 31, 1958, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees included in the SEC.

This designation became effective on February 15, 2009, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on February 15, 2009, members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this notice, became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Larry Elliott, Director, Office of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *OCAS@CDC.GOV*.                    

Christine M. Branche,

Acting Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. E9-4254 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
No. 11-6864.

#### Miguel Ruiz, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1043, 132 S. Ct. 595,

181 L. Ed. 2d 437,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8105.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 429 Fed. Appx. 374.
No. 11-7166.

#### Louis Warren, Petitioner v. Kevin Milyard, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 1125, 132 S. Ct. 1031,

181 L. Ed. 2d 759,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 321.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 670.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. §1350



In connection with the quarterly report of Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Alan P. Niedzwiecki, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This Certification has not been, and shall not be
deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.



|                    |  |                                                          
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 9, 2005 |  |                                                          
|                    |  | /s/ ALAN P. NIEDZWIECKI                                  
|                    |  | Alan P. Niedzwiecki President and Chief Executive
Officer



28
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 38 (Friday, February 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8933-8934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4169]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-692-000]


Marshall County/Holly Springs MSW LLC; Supplemental Notice That 
Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 
204 Authorization

February 20, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Marshall County/Holly Springs MSW LLC's application for market-based 
rate authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is March 12, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a

[[Page 8934]]

document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c1878493828eafada8afa492b4b1b1aeb3b581a7a4b3a2efa6aeb7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bff9faedfcf0d1d3d6d1daeccacfcfd0cdcbffd9dacddc91d8d0c9">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-4169 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 11-636.

#### Tess Wiltz, et al., Petitioners v. Bayer CropScience, LP, et al.

565 U.S. 1179, 132 S. Ct. 1145,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1019,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 971.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 645 F.3d 690.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 1, 2022

No. 04

- 21

- 00327

- CV

NETFLIX, INC. ; Netflix Worldwide Entertainment, LLC; Kyoko Miyake; Sarit G. Work; Samantha Knowles; Kate Gill; Jigsaw Productions, LLC; Muddy Waters Productio ns LLC; Alex Gibney; Philip Ross; Jo Ann Rivera; Laura A. Martinez; Brittany A. Martinez; Michelle C. Martinez; and Jose H. Martinez,

Appellants

v.

Tonya BARINA

, Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021C I04501 Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The most recent oral argument submission date was scheduled on June 28, 2022

.

That date was continued for a future submission date. On further consideration, w e set

this case for submission on briefs

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 39.1(d). All requests for oral argument

are denied

.

The cause is set for submission on briefs on July 2 2 , 2022 , before the following panel: Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Irene Rios, and Justice Beth Watkins

.

It is so ORDERED on July 1, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

______________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, CLERK OF COURT
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

 AIR AND RADIATION

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Runspecs, Model Inputs, MOVES Code and Database for HD GHG Phase 2 NPRM 

Emissions Modeling

FROM: David Choi

Assessment and Standards Division

Office of Transportation and Air Quality

TO: Docket: EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0827

DATE: May 27, 2015

The purpose of this memorandum is to transmit to the docket a DVD containing the runspecs, model 

inputs, MOVES code and database, and related files for HD GHG Phase 2 NPRM emissions modeling. 

The disk contains six folders. Table 1 lists the contents of each folder.

Table 1. Contents of Folders included in the DVD

File or Folder Description

MOVES20140731 MOVES code

MOVESDB20140731_HDGHG2 MOVES default database

Runspecs MOVES runspec files for each vehicle classes and 

alternatives

ModelInputFiles Details of the analyses used to generate MOVES 

input files for vocational and tractor/trailers

InputDB The user-input databases specified in the runspecs, 

based on the model input files

Scripts The python scripts used to convert the model input 

files to the MOVES-compatible input databases
Date: 9 August 2017 ********************

NSN: 8940-01-487-7780 (NDC) * MONOGRAPH M9C

 ********************* 

Item: Non-dairy Creamer, Dry

Document: CID A-A-20043 Creamer, Non-dairy, Dry

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 19-21 Component Classification: Ancillary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Dry state: White to light cream color, granular powder that is free flowing and

free of lumps (see Special Notes).

Odor: Should approximate that of commercial, spray dried, non-dairy creamer

Flavor: Should approximate that of commercial; spray dried, non-dairy creamer

Texture:

Dry state: Granular, free-flowing powder, free of lumps / caked masses (see

Special Notes). When used in coffee, it should disperse/dissolve rapidly without curdling

and with only a slight trace of melted fat on the surface.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance:

Rehydrated: Not readily dispersed or dissolved when placed in hot liquid.

Dehydrated: Darkened, lumpy or caked.

Odor: Rancid, stale.

Flavor: Rancid, stale, oxidized, bitter, soapy, tallowy.

Texture: Lumpy, clumped, caked (see Special Notes).

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Initially examine in dry state for appearance and texture; then examine in instant coffee. If product is

caked or lumped in dry state, examine the package closely for cuts; tears, holes or open seals. Inserting

a pocket flashlight inside the package while in a dark room often aids in identifying package integrity 

defects. Also shake package vigorously ten times and observe for minute quantities of product that may

sift out of package especially at the juncture of the seams and the folded edge of the package. The

defect is appropriately called a sifter. When testing in coffee, drop creamer into coffee and observe 

particle dispersion for 15 seconds; then stir coffee for 15 seconds and observe after one minute for the

defects described above.

Special Notes

Lumps that break apart under light pressure (e.g:, pressed between the fingers gently) are of no concern.