alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,270
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,421
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,173
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,106
<PP&E>                                          11,045
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,562)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,284
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,118
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,242
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,605
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,284
<SALES>                                         58,483
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,483
<CGS>                                           42,634
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,134
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  62
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,287
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,315
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,972
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,972
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .52


</TABLE>
No. 11-8013.

#### Kenneth Clark, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1184, 132 S. Ct. 1159,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 992.

181 L. Ed. 2d 1030,

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 657 F.3d 578.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 42 (Thursday, March 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4669]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Multi-Lingual 
Initiatives Issue Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Multi-Lingual 
Initiatives Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, April 9, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-3557.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Multi-Lingual Initiatives 
Issue Committee will be held Thursday, April 9, 2009, at 2 p.m. Eastern 
Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral 
comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited 
conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made 
with Marisa Knispel. For more information please contact Ms. Knispel at 
1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech 
Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web 
site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS Issues.

    Dated: February 26, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
 [FR Doc. E9-4669 Filed 3-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00705-CV

Texas Department of Public Safety, Appellant

v.

Devin Matthew Gonzalez, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF HAYS COUNTY

NO. 9264-C, HONORABLE HOWARD S. WARNER II, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Texas Department of Public Safety moves to dismiss this appeal. We grant

the motion and dismiss this appeal. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.

 

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Justices B. A. Smith, Puryear and Waldrop

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: April 28, 2006
No. 11-573.

#### K2 America Corporation, Petitioner v. Roland Oil & Gas, LLC.

565 U.S. 1157, 132 S. Ct. 1098,

181 L. Ed. 2d 978,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 756.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 653 F.3d 1024.
No. 11-519.

#### David E. Conwill, Petitioner v. Mississippi.

565 U.S. 1080, 132 S. Ct. 826,

181 L. Ed. 2d 527,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8728,

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Mississippi, Madison County, denied.
No. 11-7215.

#### Kevin Cleveland, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1098, 132 S. Ct. 857,

181 L. Ed. 2d 558,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8922.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 413 Fed. Appx. 445.
Zhejiang Yong Xing Digital Technology
Co. Ltd.


Share-holding Entrustment Agreement


 


Zhejiang Yong Xing Digital Technology Co.
Ltd. (“Zhejiang”) was organized on July 11, 2005. This entrustment agreement (hereinafter called as “this agreement”)
was signed by following parties (hereinafter called as “agreement parties”)


 


Party A: Capital Future Development
Limited (“Capital”) was lawfully established on July 22, 2004. Capital has the right to enjoy the actual shareholder’s
rights and has the right to obtain any benefits Party B received from Zhejiang.


 


Party B: Huiyi Lv is a citizen of PRC,
his national ID number is ____________________. Weiyi Lv is the nominal holder of 20% equity of Zhejiang.


 


		I.	Being as the actual investor of share-holding on behalf of the holder, Party A has the right to enjoy
actual shareholder’s rights and has the right to obtain relevant investing income received by Party B.



		II.	Party A will take the full legal and economic responsibilities in association with the acquisition
of Zhejiang’s equity as well as executing the share-holding entrustment.



		III.	Party A is the actual owner of Zhejiang’s equity. Party B will hold the shares on behalf of
Party A. Party B will follow Party A’s command to perform all the relevant procedures to complete the share-holding entrustment.



		IV.	Any modification or cancellation for this agreement will go into effect only after both parties have
signed the written agreement. Any party can not modify or cancel this agreement without consent of the other party. When the agreement
parties have disputes with respect to interpretation and implementation of items of this agreement, all parties shall settle disputes
through friendly negotiation. Either party can seek arbitration to make a settlement per Hongkong rules and law if the disputes
can’t be settled through negotiation. The arbitration locale is Hongkong.



		V.	This agreement is in duplicate and each party holds one. This agreement will go into effect since
Party A’s authorized representative affixes the signature and the official seal and Party B Together affixes the signature.



 


Party A: Capital Future Development
Limited (stamp)


Authorized representative:/s/ Zhenggang Wang
(signature)


 


Party B: Huiyi Lv: /s/ Huiyi Lv (signature)
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Home Interiors & Gifts, Inc. (the
Registrant);
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report;
 4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and
15d-15e) for the Registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls or
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report based on such evaluation;c)
    
    Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ KEITH S. KRZEMINSKIKeith S. KrzeminskiSenior Vice President of Finance and Chief
Financial Officer
No. 11-374.

#### Marvin Smith, et ux., Petitioners v. Atlantic Southern Bank, et al. (three judgments).

565 U.S. 1186, 132 S. Ct. 1163,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 968.

181 L. Ed. 2d 1032,

January 23, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 1060, 132 S. Ct. 769, 181 L. Ed. 2d 486, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8626.
No. 11-6732.

#### Mansoor Alam, Petitioner v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.

565 U.S. 1095, 132 S. Ct. 847,

181 L. Ed. 2d 553,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8886.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 15

- 0386

Focus Ready Draft 4/23/2015

ENGINEER: Hall \ DDB

° C (OECDC

SAT (concerns ) (04/14/2015):Analogs:

Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Migration to groundwater: Slow

PBT rating: P1B1T2

Health: 1

- 2 Dermal, Inhalation

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 6 ppb)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2

- 3C

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 09/30/2013 version of ChemSTEER.INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 15

- 0386INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 15

- 0386
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,****ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350 (adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I,the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Dakota Growers PastaCompany, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2004 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

Date:  June 14, 2004

 
|   | /s/ Timothy J. Dodd                      |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                     |
|   | Timothy J. Dodd                          |
|   | *President and Chief Executive  Officer* |

 

1

----
No. 09-8778.

#### Kevin Wayne McDaniels, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 986, 130 S. Ct. 1723,

176 L. Ed. 2d 203,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1952.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 340 Fed. Appx. 886.
No. 09-8541.

#### James Chavis-Tucker, Petitioner v. Stuart Hudson, Warden.

559 U.S. 982, 130 S. Ct. 1712,

176 L. Ed. 2d 198,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2061.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 348 Fed. Appx. 125.
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lorrie Ann Archibald, Chief Executive Officer of Ireland Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

|(i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                              

|By:    | /s/ Lorrie Ann
      Archibald
|------ | ------------------------------
|Name:  | LORRIE ANN ARCHIBALD          
|Title: | Chief Executive Officer       
|Date:  | May 15, 2007                  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
No. 09-7560.

#### Mustafa Redzic, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1003, 130 S. Ct. 1935,

176 L. Ed. 2d 360,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2637.

March 22, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until April 12, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3608 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the ability of veterans 

to receive in-state tuition using educational assistance administered by 

the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 2, 2019 

Mr. DAVID P. ROE of Tennessee (for himself and Mrs. LURIA) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the 

ability of veterans to receive in-state tuition using educational assistance administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENTS FOR IN-STATE TUITION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3679(c) of title 38, 

5 United States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking ‘‘less than 

7 three years before the date of enrollment in the 

8 course concerned’’; and 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3608 IH

1 (2) in paragraph (4)— 

2 (A) by striking ‘‘It shall’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘(A) It shall’’; and 

4 (B) by adding at the end the following new 

5 subparagraph: 

6 ‘‘(B) To the extent feasible, the Secretary shall make 

7 publicly available on the internet website of the Depart8 ment a database explaining any requirements described in 

9 subparagraph (A) that are established by a public institu10 tion of higher learning for an individual to be charged tui11 tion and fees at a rate that is equal to or less than the 

12 rate the institution charges for tuition and fees for resi13 dents of the State in which the institution is located. The 

14 Secretary shall disapprove a course of education provided 

15 by such an institution that does not provide the Sec16 retary— 

17 ‘‘(i) an initial explanation of such requirements; 

18 and 

19 ‘‘(ii) not later than 90 days after the date on 

20 which any such requirements change, the updated 

21 requirements.’’. 

22 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendments made by this 

23 section shall apply with respect to a quarter, semester, or 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3608 IH

1 term, as applicable, commencing on or after August 1, 

2 2020. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
No. 09-8962.

#### Ronell Smith, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1018, 130 S. Ct. 1912,

176 L. Ed. 2d 386,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2482.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 351 Fed. Appx. 635.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9432-9433]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4548]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,505]


SB Acquisition, LLC, DBA Saunders Brothers Including On-Site 
Leased Workers From Manpower, Fryeburg, ME; Notice of Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated January 29, 2009, the petitioner requested 
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding 
workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) applicable to workers 
and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on 
January 2, 2009. The Notice of Determination was published in the 
Federal Register on January 26, 2009 (74 FR 4464).
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the finding that sales and production at the subject firm 
increased during the period of January through November 2008, when 
compared to the same period in 2007.

[[Page 9433]]

    In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner provided 
additional information indicating that sales and production at the 
subject facility declined during the relevant period and that the 
subject firm imported products like or directly competitive with the 
products manufactured at the subject firm.
    The Department has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the 
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of February 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-4548 Filed 3-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
No. 09-726.

#### Ames Department Stores, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. ASM Capital, L.P.

559 U.S. 962, 130 S. Ct. 1527,

176 L. Ed. 2d 151,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1093.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 582 F.3d 422.