alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4808 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4808

To prohibit the importation of motor vehicles of the People's Republic 
of China until the tariff rates that China imposes on motor vehicles of 
 the United States are equal to the rates of duty applicable to motor 
vehicles of the People's Republic of China under the Harmonized Tariff 
                     Schedule of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 2006

Mr. Jones of North Carolina (for himself and Mr. Kildee) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the importation of motor vehicles of the People's Republic 
of China until the tariff rates that China imposes on motor vehicles of 
 the United States are equal to the rates of duty applicable to motor 
vehicles of the People's Republic of China under the Harmonized Tariff 
                     Schedule of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Unfair Chinese Automotive Tariff 
Equalization Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IMPORTS OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF THE PEOPLE'S 
              REPUBLIC OF CHINA UNTIL TARIFF RATES ARE EQUAL.

    (a) Prohibition.--No motor vehicle that is the product of the 
People's Republic of China may be imported into the United States.
    (b) Duration.--The prohibition contained in subsection (a) is 
effective until the date on which the President certifies in writing to 
the Congress that the tariff rates imposed by the People's Republic of 
China on motor vehicles that are products of the United States are 
equal to the rates of duty applicable to motor vehicles of the same 8-
digit subheading of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
that are products of the People's Republic of China.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Motor vehicle.--The term ``motor vehicle'' means any 
        article described in heading 8703 of the Harmonized Tariff 
        Schedule of the United States, except that the term does not 
        include any article described in subheading 8703.10.
            (2) United states.--The term ``United States'', when used 
        in the geographic sense, includes any commonwealth, territory, 
        or possession of the United States.
    (d) Effective Date.--This section takes effect on the 15th day 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

**OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

I, Edward O. Irion, certifythat:

1.         I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc.;

2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.         The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

a)        Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)       Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)        Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.         The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)        All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)       Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 19, 2007
|        | /s/ Edward O. Irion      |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Edward O. Irion          |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

1

----
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001067462
<NAME>                        Insignia/ESG Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     0
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-98
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-98
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-98
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                0
<CASH>                                         21,470
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  112,331
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         16,364
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 485,936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        32,427
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     329,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   485,936
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               227,799
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  200,310
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               14,451
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             706
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,620
<INCOME-TAX>                                   5,229
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,391
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Montana Eleventh Judicial District Court. County of Flathead.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- KENNETH MARTIN CHANDLER, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-10-134

DECISION

*6Done in open Court this 5th day of February, 2016.

DATED this 29th day of February, 2016.

On October 29, 2015, in Cause No. DC-03-392, the Defendant was sentenced to the Montana State Prison for five (5) years; in Cause No. DC-10-134, the Defendant was sentenced to the Montana State Prison for a consecutive term of three (3) years. Both of these sentences are to run concurrent to his Federal Sentence of 70 months in a U.S. Bureau of Prisons filed on Sept. 3, 2015. Defendant was given credit for three hundred ninety-four (394) days time served.

On February 5, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Jennifer Streano of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. John Warner, Member.
Montana Twentieth Judicial District Court. County of Lake.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- CHASE SHEEHAN, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-05-022

DECISION

On January 28, 2016, the Defendant’s suspended sentence was revoked for violation of the conditions of his probation, and he was sentenced to the Montana State Prison for a term of forty-one (41) years, with thirty-one (31) years suspended, for the offense of Sexual Intercourse Without Consent, a Felony, as specified in §45-5-502(1), MCA. The Court granted credit for time served in the amount of 37 days, with credit for a previous revocation of 62 days for a total of 99 days credit for time served. The Defendant completed Phases I and II of the Sexual Offender Treatment Program as part of his original sentence. The Defendant was designated a Level III sex offender in his original sentence. Consistent with the recommendations of Dr. Chris Quigley, Defendant shall receive credit for Phases I and II and is not required to complete Phases I and II as part of this sentence and Judgment. The Court Ordered that the relevant conditions previously imposed were re-imposed as conditions of the Defendant’s sentence.

On August 4, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant appeared by Vision Net from the Great Falls Regional Prison and was represented by Brent Getty of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are *81insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Done in open Court this 4th day of August, 2016.

DATED this 24th day of August, 2016.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member and Hon. Brad Newman, Member.
II 

Calendar No. 570 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4811 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 3, 2006 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AUGUST 1, 2006 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 215 West Industrial Park Road in Harrison, 

Arkansas, as the ‘‘John Paul Hammerschmidt Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 215 West Industrial Park Road in Harrison, Ar6 kansas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘John Paul 

7 Hammerschmidt Post Office Building’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4811 RS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘John Paul Hammerschmidt Post Office Building’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS

bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Calendar No. 570 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4811 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostHammerschmidt Post Office Building’’. Road in Harrison, Arkansas, as the ‘‘John Paul al Service located at 215 West Industrial Park 

AUGUST 1, 2006 

Reported without amendment 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 38 (Friday, February 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 8976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4266]



[[Page 8976]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group, 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Program Project Review Committee.
    Date: March 19-20, 2009.
    Time: March 19, 2009, 6 p.m. to 8 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.

    Time: March 20, 2009, 8:30 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Jeffrey H Hurst, PHD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 7208, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-435-0303, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c7afb2b5b4b3ad87a9afaba5aee9a9aeafe9a0a8b1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9bf3eee9e8eff1dbf5f3f7f9f2b5f5f2f3b5fcf4ed">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 23, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-4266 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Sites with 99th percentile 2010-2012 daily 1-h max SO2 concentration > 600 ppb

AQS Site ID Latitude Longitude City Name CBSA Name

150010007 19.41 -155.28 Hawaii Volcanoes National Park Hilo, HI

150010005 19.43 -155.26 Hawaii Volcanoes National Park Hilo, HI

150012016 19.2 -155.48 Pahala Hilo, HI

150012020 19.11 -155.77 Hawaiian Ocean View Hilo, HI

Sites with 99th percentile 2010-2012 daily 1-h max SO2 concentration 401-600 ppb

<None>

Sites with 99th percentile 2010-2012 daily 1-h max SO2 concentration 201-400 ppb

AQS Site ID Latitude Longitude City Name CBSA Name

150011006 19.71 -155.11 Hilo Hilo, HI

040071001 33 -110.78 Hayden Payson, AZ

220870007 29.94 -89.97 Chalmette New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA

171790004 40.55 -89.65 Pekin Peoria, IL

471630007 36.53 -82.51 Kingsport Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA

330131006 43.13 -71.45 Suncook Concord, NH

Sites with 99th percentile 2010-2012 daily 1-h max SO2 concentration 75-200 ppb

AQS Site ID Latitude Longitude City Name CBSA Name

181250005 38.51 -87.24 Not in a city Jasper, IN

550850996 45.64 -89.41 Rhinelander (Wisconsin)

290950034 39.1 -94.57 Kansas City Kansas City, MO-KS

391150004 39.63 -81.67 Not in a city (Morgan County, OH)

390850007 41.72 -81.24 Painesville Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH

420070005 40.68 -80.35 Not in a city Pittsburgh, PA

181671014 39.51 -87.4 Terre Haute Terre Haute, IN

420030064 40.32 -79.86 Liberty Pittsburgh, PA

211110051 38.06 -85.89 Louisville Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN

390810017 40.36 -80.61 Steubenville Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

470090101 35.63 -83.94 Not in a city Knoxville, TN

120890005 30.65 -81.46 Fernandina Beach Jacksonville, FL

540090005 40.34 -80.59 Follansbee Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

421230004 41.84 -79.16 Not in a city Warren, PA

381050105 48.39 -102.91 Not in a city Williston, ND

120570109 27.85 -82.38 Tampa Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL

180270002 38.57 -87.21 Not in a city Washington, IN

181091001 39.51 -86.39 Martinsville Indianapolis-Carmel, IN

261630015 42.3 -83.1 Detroit Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI
210373002 39.02 -84.47 Highland Heights Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN

170311601 41.66 -87.99 Lemont Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI

180970057 39.74 -86.18 Indianapolis (Remainder) Indianapolis-Carmel, IN

150011012 19.5 -155.91 Kealakekua Hilo, HI

181670018 39.48 -87.4 Terre Haute Terre Haute, IN

420630004 40.56 -78.91 Not in a city Indiana, PA

371290006 34.26 -77.95 Not in a city Wilmington, NC

181770006 39.81 -84.88 Richmond Richmond, IN

180431004 38.3 -85.83 New Albany Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN

390350038 41.47 -81.68 Cleveland Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH

540511002 39.91 -80.73 Moundsville Wheeling, WV-OH

540090007 40.38 -80.58 Not in a city Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH

130510021 32.06 -81.04 Savannah Savannah, GA

221210001 30.5 -91.21 Not in a city Baton Rouge, LA

250051004 41.68 -71.16 Fall River Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA

131150003 34.26 -85.32 Not in a city Rome, GA
# C_2016417EN.01001004.xml

| 11.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 417/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 417/10

---

FUSION FOR ENERGY JOINT UNDERTAKING

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2015

(2016/C 417/39)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.fusionforenergy.europa.eu/aboutfusion/keydocs.aspx

---
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Agritech, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yau-Sing Tang, the
Chief Financial Officer and Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1.  
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




August
      13, 2010
              /s/ Yau-Sing TangYau-Sing
      TangChief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
No. 09-7968.

#### William King, Petitioner v. Stephen Mayberg, et al.

559 U.S. 947, 130 S. Ct. 1520,

176 L. Ed. 2d 126,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1277.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 334 Fed. Appx. 802.
No. 09-6839.

#### Levi W. Smith, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

559 U.S. 974, 130 S. Ct. 1686,

176 L. Ed. 2d 186,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2073.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
### In The C ou rt o f A p p ea ls Si x t h Appe l l at e Di st r i c t o f Te x as a t Te x ar ka na

______________________________ No . 0 6- 08 -0 00 38 -C R

______________________________ ROBERT DA L E REPP OND, Appe llant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appea l from the 8th J udicial District Court

Hopkins County , Texas Trial Court No. 0719090

B e f o r e M o r r i s s , C
. J. , C a

rt e r an d M o s e l e y , JJ. Memorandum Opinion by J ustice Moseley2 MEMORANDUM OPI

NI ON Rob e rtD a l e R e p p o n d , a

p p e l l an t , h a s f

i l e d w i t h t h i s C o u rta

m o t i o nt o d i s m i s s h i s a

pp e a l. The motion is signed by Reppond and by his c ounsel in c ompliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the Te x as Rules of Appellate Procedur e. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.2(a) . As authorized by Rule 42.2, we g rant the motion. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.2. Ac c or din g ly , w e dis mis s th e a pp e a l.

Ba iley

C. Moseley J ustice Date Submitted: J uly 28, 2008 Date D ecide d: J uly 29, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh