alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CY NEMS_gas_sales_2b NEMS_diesel_sales_2b NEMS_gas_sales_3 NEMS_diesel_sales_3

2011 179,196 213,800 42,339 105,470

2012 214,020 215,085 33,629 85,010

2013 232,346 218,410 35,231 90,111

2014 258,324 222,458 36,120 93,522

2015 281,977 228,679 37,187 97,442

2016 291,450 236,361 37,786 100,236

2017 297,939 241,624 37,342 100,086

2018 298,415 242,010 36,595 98,998

2019 299,180 242,631 35,670 97,285

2020 301,791 244,748 35,197 96,752

2021 302,538 245,354 34,854 96,252

2022 304,125 246,641 34,744 96,476

2023 303,636 246,244 34,469 96,295

2024 310,901 252,136 35,222 98,951

2025 316,652 256,800 35,875 101,313

2026 323,114 262,040 36,494 103,561

2027 327,403 265,519 36,955 105,249

2028 331,893 269,160 37,297 106,662

2029 336,853 273,182 37,411 107,158

2030 336,973 273,280 37,582 108,032

2031 337,716 273,882 37,746 108,824

2032 338,355 274,400 37,913 109,634

2033 338,324 274,376 38,013 110,225

2034 339,414 275,260 38,247 111,188

2035 341,028 276,568 38,551 112,344

2036 342,717 277,938 38,756 112,557

2037 345,042 279,824 39,152 113,943

2038 347,398 281,735 39,556 115,339

2039 349,161 283,164 39,897 116,537

2040 350,346 284,125 40,177 117,546
Diesel Gas Gas share

 319,270 221,535 0.409639

 300,095 247,649 0.452125

 308,521 267,577 0.464464

 315,980 294,444 0.48236

 326,121 319,164 0.494609

 336,597 329,236 0.494472

 341,710 335,281 0.495252

 341,008 335,010 0.495564

 339,916 334,850 0.496246

 341,500 336,988 0.496675

 341,606 337,392 0.496897

 343,117 338,869 0.496886

 342,539 338,105 0.496743

 351,087 346,123 0.49644

 358,113 352,527 0.49607

 365,601 359,608 0.495868

 370,768 364,358 0.49564

 375,822 369,190 0.495549

 380,340 374,264 0.495974

 381,312 374,555 0.49553

 382,706 375,462 0.495223

 384,034 376,268 0.494893

 384,601 376,337 0.49457

 386,448 377,661 0.49425

 388,912 379,579 0.493928

 390,495 381,473 0.494156

 393,767 384,194 0.493847

 397,074 386,954 0.493546

 399,701 389,058 0.493253

 401,671 390,523 0.492964
# C_2016091EN.01000101.xml

| 8.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 91/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 91/1

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP, as implemented by Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/318, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/311, concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine

(2016/C 91/01)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons who appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP (1), as implemented by Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/318 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/311 (4), concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine.

1

2

3

4

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the abovementioned Annexes should continue to be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/119/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine. The grounds for designations of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 208/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered, before 15 December 2016 to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 66, 6.3.2014, p. 26.

1

(2)  OJ L 60, 5.3.2016, p. 76.

2

(3)  OJ L 66, 6.3.2014, p. 1.

3

(4)  OJ L 60, 5.3.2016, p. 1.

4

---
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3962 STANDARD 22.37 -1.82 7.82

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

DLA/MARINE CORP SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT September 17, 2020

Fabric Nomenclature SWEATER, SERVICE, WOOL A-A-55239

Shade Number OLIVE GREEN 2247 Piece/Roll Number 3962
No. 11-408.

#### David H. Tullis and Michael S. Mack, Petitioners v. UMB Bank, N.A., et al.

565 U.S. 1148, 132 S. Ct. 1005,

181 L. Ed. 2d 791,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 499.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 423 Fed. Appx. 567.
***********************

 * MONOGRAPH NO: 1B2

***********************

ITEM: Omelet w/Smoked Sausage and Potatoes (OSP)

NSN: 8940-01-237-9828 ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR-O-0003 Can

 MIL-O-44238

 8940-01-472-3788 PCR-O-006 Poly

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 319 (Primary)

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Yellow-tan egg (w/slight gray-green tone) mixture with gravy, 

white potato dices; and pinkish-tan sausage bits. New version: Golden yellow, 

moderately firm egg mixture with pinkish brown fluid near sausage pieces; off white 

potato dices, l-1/2 inch medium brown red sausage links; varied size scrambled egg 

pieces.

ODOR: Smoked, cooked spicy sausage and a slight cooked egg aroma.

FLAVOR: Typical of. a cooked egg product containing spicy pork sausage with a 

slight pepper taste.

TEXTURE: Soft to slightly firm egg mixture with slightly dry to slightly oily, chewy 

sausage bits

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36 months

 100 DEGREES F: 6 months

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

Appearance: Product may become slightly darker, especially the surface.

 Odor: Egg aroma may be more noticeable; slight loss of sausage spice odor.

Flavor: Product may become slightly salty and other spices may lose their flavor.

Texture: Potatoes may become hard or fibrous: Omelet texture will become firmer 

or may become rubbery.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None.

SPECIAL NOTES: Can is designed to yield 18 portions of approximately 2/3 cup 

each (161 grams).
No. 11-7194.

#### Isan Contant, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

565 U.S. 1126, 132 S. Ct. 1034,

181 L. Ed. 2d 761,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 363.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 441 Fed. Appx. 105.
No. 09-7993.

#### Gregory Paul Lance, Petitioner v. Jim Morrow, Warden.

559 U.S. 947, 130 S. Ct. 1523,

176 L. Ed. 2d 127,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1123.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 11-623.

#### Steven Fishman, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1115, 132 S. Ct. 1046,

181 L. Ed. 2d 740,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 372.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 645 F.3d 1175.
EX-10.3(a)



 Exhibit 10.3(a) 
 June 1, 2011 
 Winton Capital Management 

1a. St. Mary Abbot’s Place 
 Kensington,
London W86LS, 
 U.K. 
 Attention:
Mr. Martin Hunt 
 Re: Management Agreement Renewals 
 Dear Mr. Hunt: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2012 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

  

	 	•	 	 Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Orion Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 CMF Winton Feeder I LP 


  

	 	•	 	 CMF Winton Master Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Institutional Futures Portfolio LP 


  

	 	•	 	 Abingdon Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Global Futures Fund Ltd. 


  

	 	•	 	 Orion Futures Fund (Cayman) Ltd. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1302. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Jennifer Magro
		 	 Jennifer Magro
 Chief
Financial Officer & Director


  

			
	WINTON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
		
	By:	 	/s/ Andrew Bastow
	 Print Name:
 JM/sr
	 	Andrew Bastow
(1) Adjusting Price $16.10 CWT

(2) Base Price $15.99 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.11

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0095

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0047

Price change per quart $0.0024

Price change per pint $0.0012

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0009

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0007

Price change per half pint $0.0006

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.01

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.00

Price adjustment per quart $0.00

Price adjustment per pint $0.00

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Dept. of Food and Agriculture Announcement of Minimum Prices

 Effective Date: May 6, 2018
REGULATORY EVALUAnON

Directorateldentifier: 201O-NM-OI7-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a su stantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of

transportation?

YES () explain NO (X)
No. 11-676.

#### Nancy Euw-Jiong Sitanggang, Petitioner v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 1179, 132 S. Ct. 1152,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1020,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 919,

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 419 Fed. Appx. 756.
No. 11-7734.

#### Louis Trimble, Petitioner v. California.

565 U.S. 1182, 132 S. Ct. 1153,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1025,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1036.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District, denied.
No. 11-7460.

#### Ray Richard Renfro, Petitioner v. William Knipp, Warden.

565 U.S. 1166, 132 S. Ct. 1114,

181 L. Ed. 2d 995,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 856.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 11-315.

#### Mahmood Yoonessi, Petitioner v. Randy Ratajczak, et al.

565 U.S. 1174, 132 S. Ct. 1137,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1011,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 642.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 1035, 132 S. Ct. 581, 181 L. Ed. 2d 423, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8188.
No. 11A691.

#### John Kasich, Governor of Ohio, et al., Applicants v. Charles Lorraine.

565 U.S. 1186, 132 S. Ct. 1306,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1065.

181 L. Ed. 2d 1034,

February 8, 2012.

Application to vacate the stay of execution of sentence of death entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio on January 11, 2012, presented to Justice Kagan, and by her referred to the Court, denied.

Same case below, 840 F. Supp. 2d 1044.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 99 (b)

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I hereby certify that this Form 10-Q, containing BANK ONE CORPORATION's
consolidated financial statements for the three months and nine months ended
September 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Corporation.

November 13, 2002

                                                          /s/  Heidi Miller
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                             Heidi Miller
                                                     Principal Financial Officer

                                       69
No. 09-748.

#### James Radmore, Petitioner v. Aegis Communications Group, Inc.

559 U.S. 940, 130 S. Ct. 1536,

176 L. Ed. 2d 115,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1294.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 346 Fed. Appx. 835.
No. 11-6750.

#### Anthony Robert Stokes, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1019, 132 S. Ct. 564,

181 L. Ed. 2d 406,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7949.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 437 Fed. Appx. 225.
No. 11-6926.

#### Kevin McDonald, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1152132 S. Ct. 1085,

181 L. Ed. 2d 804,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 423.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 1045, 132 S. Ct. 600, 181 L. Ed. 2d 440, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8212.
#### Boyce and Sayer v. Carpet Plus

2016 MT 258N

DA 16-0034

10/11/16

Affirmed

Dist. 4 (Missoula)
No. 11-7081.

#### Raynee Denise Cook, Petitioner v. Kenneth Hubin, et al.

565 U.S. 1109, 132 S. Ct. 1074,

181 L. Ed. 2d 731,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 357.

January 9, 2012.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until January 30, 2012, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Same case below, 16 A.3d 973.
APP A

DSCPH 4155.2

 ************************

NSN: 7340-01-508-2742 (SPN) *MONOGRAPH NO: M1G

 ************************

Item: MRE, High Impact 7 Inch (Brown) Type IV, Item 13

Document: A-A-3019, Fork, Knife, and Spoon (Plastic)

Approximate Caloric Value: Not Applicable 

Characteristic of Item: 

Length: 7 inches 

Color: brown 

Defects likely to Occur:

MRE Spoon missing from the menu bag

Broken, Jagged edge, Misshaped, Warped or Cracked

Unique Examination/Test Procedures: None

Special Notes: None
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **1 -**  **7028**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , P laintiff

– Appell ee ,
v. ALAN B. FABIAN, Defen d a nt

– Appell ant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Distric t of Maryland , at Baltimore
. Catherine C. Blake , District Judge. ( 1 : 0 7

- c r - 0 0 355

- CCB

- 1 ; 1:09

- cv - 02810

- CCB )

Submitted : December 6, 2011 Decided: January 12, 2012

Before KING, SHEDD, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by unpublished per curiam o pinion
.
Alan B. Fabian , Appellant Pro Se
. Jo nathan Biran, Tonya Kelly Kowitz, Assistant United States Attorney s , Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Alan B. Fabian seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2011 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable j urists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on proce dural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the rec ord and conclude that Fabian has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Fabian’s motions for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presen ted in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Michelle H.Y. Voon  | Attn: Robert Castle / Kristine Gullo |
| 100 Plaza One 6th Floor         | 301 Bellevue Parkway, 3rd Floor |
| Jersey City, NY 07311                | Wilmington, DE 19809 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Alvin Courts                   | Ally Bank |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 700               | Attn:  Martha Tate |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | 200 West Civic Center Drive |
|                                            | Sandy, UT 84070 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2017-4 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of August 23, 2017 through December 31, 2017, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   |   |
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 149 (Tuesday, August 4, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41591-41592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20683]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decrees Under the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that on July 23, 1998 seven proposed consent 
decrees in United States, et al. v. Colorado Organic Chemical Company, 
Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 98-D-1600, were lodged with the United 
States District Court for the District of Colorado.
    In this action, the United States and the State of Colorado sought 
recovery of approximately $21 million in response costs incurred in 
relation to the Sand Creek Industrial Site located in Commerce City, 
Colorado under Section 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. The seven proposed consent 
decrees provide for an immediate recovery of $1,796,425.00 for the EPA 
Hazardous Substance Superfund and $80,500.00 for the State of Colorado. 
Two proposed consent decrees provide for further reimbursement 
resulting from the sale of real property and potential insurance 
coverage. The settling defendants include: Colorado Organic Chemical 
Company, Inc.; Phillip C. Mozer; Chem-Real Investment Co.; Ronald L. 
Seigneur, as current trustee for the Phillip C. Mozer Trust; Gasamat 
Oil Corporation of Colorado; Asamera Oil (U.S.), Inc.; Burlington 
Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company f/k/a Burlington Northern 
Railroad Company; BFI Waste Systems of North America, Inc. f/k/a 
Browning Ferris Industries of Colorado, Inc.; Robert S. Calvert; Shell 
Oil Company f/k/a Shell Chemical Corporation; and L-C Corporation.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to United 
States, et al. v. Colorado

[[Page 41592]]

Organic Chemical Company, Inc. et al., D.J. Ref. 90-11-3-1697.
    The proposed consent decrees may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney, 1961 Stout Street, 11th Floor, Drawer 3608, 
Denver, CO 80294; at U.S. EPA Region VIII, 999 18th Street, Denver, 
Colorado 80202; and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 
4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed 
consent decrees may be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent 
Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005. In 
requesting a copy, please enclose a check in the amount of $57.25 (25 
cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the Consent Decree 
Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 98-20683 Filed 8-3-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
No. 11-5762.

#### Lorenzo L. Winfield, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1037, 132 S. Ct. 576,

181 L. Ed. 2d 425,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8199.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 243.