alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 09-906.

#### Montgomery Blair Sibley, Petitioner v. Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, Supreme Court of the United States, et al.

559 U.S. 965, 130 S. Ct. 1729,

176 L. Ed. 2d 176,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2121.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Because the Court lacks a quorum, 28 U.S.C. § 1, and since the only qualified Justice is of the opinion that the case cannot be heard and determined at the next Term of Court, the judgment is affirmed under 28 U.S.C. § 2109, which provides that under these circumstances “the court shall enter its order affirming the judgment of the court from which the case was brought for review with the same effect as upon affirmance by an equally divided court.”

The Chief Justice, Justice Stevens, Justice Scalia, Justice Kennedy, Justice Thomas, Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer, and Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
#### Garza v. State

OP 16-0722

12/13/16

Denied

Original Proceeding Habeas Corpus
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 151 (Thursday, August 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 42062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-21010]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[NV-930-4210-05; N-60836, N-60970]


Termination of Land Exchange Segregation; Clark County, NV

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action terminates the land exchange segregation dated 
July 23, 1997 for N-61855. The lands are being made available for 
Recreation and Public Purpose (R&PP) Leases to Clark County for park 
sites under N-60836 and N-60970 published in the Federal Register on 
July 8, 1998.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 6, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheryl Frassa-McDonough (702) 647-
5088.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Upon notation to the public land office 
records, on July 23, 1997, the lands were segregated for exchange 
purposes. The lands became segregated from all other forms of 
appropriation under the public land laws including location and entry 
under the mining laws. The lands are needed for R&PP Leases. The 
segregation is hereby terminated on the following described lands:

N-60836

Mount Diablo Meridian

T. 22 S., R. 61 E.,
    Sec. 28, Lots 1-4, 14-16, 18-21, 31-34.

    Approximately 37.5 acres

N-60970

Mount Diablo Meridian

T. 22 S., R. 60 E.,
    Sec. 5, NE\1/4\SW\1/4\.

    Approximately 40.0 acres
    The areas described aggregate 77.5 acres.

    The land is hereby made available for Recreation & Public Purposes. 
The land will remain closed to surface entry and mining due to an 
overlapping segregation.

    Dated: July 30, 1998.
Rex Wells,
Assistant Field Office Manager, Las Vegas, NV.
[FR Doc. 98-21010 Filed 8-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P
No. 09-8338.

#### Stanley E. Jalowiec, Petitioner v. Margaret Bradshaw, Warden.

559 U.S. 980, 130 S. Ct. 1707,

176 L. Ed. 2d 195,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2050.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA

#### Klepper, et al. v. MDOT

2016 MT 248N

DA 15-0697

10/04/16

Affirmed

Dist. 4 (Missoula)
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADDED BY**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Regalwood Global Energy Ltd. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Brooke B. Coburn, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as added by §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

 
 1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 
 2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report. 
 
Date: March 29, 2018  By: 
/s/ Brooke B. Coburn
    
Brooke B. Coburn

President

*(Principal Executive Officer)*

 
**
**EXHIBIT 3.2**

**STATE OF DELAWARE**

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT**

**OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION**

The corporationorganized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware does hereby certify: 

**FIRST:** That by unanimouswritten consent of the Board of Directors of Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc., resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said amendment to beadvisable and calling a meeting of the stockholders of said corporation for consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows: 

**RESOLVED**, that the Certificate of Incorporation of this corporation be amended by changing Article IV thereof so that, as amended, the first paragraph of said Article IV shall be and read as follows:

The total number of shares of all classes of capital stock which the Corporation shall have the authority to issue is two hundred seventymillion (270,000,000) shares, consisting of two hundred fifty million (250,000,000) shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) and twenty million (20,000,000) shares of preferred stockwith a par value of $0.001 per share (the “Preferred Stock”). 

**SECOND:** That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors,a special meeting of the stockholders of said corporation was duly called and held upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares as required bystatute were voted in favor of the amendment. 

**THIRD:** That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 ofthe General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,** said corporationhas caused this certificate to be signed this 28th day of September, 2007.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
Just i ces

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 28, 2011

y0620 

# Order

June 28, 2011

142793

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142793 COA: 294920 Calhoun CC: 2 009-001532-FC RONALD ALAN BISH, a/k/a RONALD ALLEN BISH, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 3, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
No. 09-8154.

#### In re James Dean Taylor, Petitioner.

559 U.S. 969, 130 S. Ct. 1694,

176 L. Ed. 2d 207,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1981.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4653 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4653

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To repeal a prohibition on the use of certain funds for tunneling in 
 certain areas with respect to the Los Angeles to San Fernando Valley 
                    Metro Rail project, California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROHIBITION.

    The second sentence of section 321 of the Department of 
Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1986 (99 Stat. 
1287) is repealed.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 20, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4653

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To repeal a prohibition on the use of certain funds for tunneling in 
 certain areas with respect to the Los Angeles to San Fernando Valley 
                    Metro Rail project, California.
```
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $14.26 CWT 0.965 $13.7609

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.5420 LB 3.5 $5.3970

Class I Price $19.1579

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $13.77 CWT 0.965 $13.2881

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.5969 LB 3.5 $5.5892

Class I Price $18.8772

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.2807

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0241

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0121

Price change per quart $0.0060

Price change per pint $0.0030

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0022

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0018

Price change per half pint $0.0015

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.02

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.01

Price adjustment per quart $0.01

Price adjustment per pint $0.00

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

**No price adjustment is required this month since the price change per gallon in either direction 

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause.)

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: September 1, 2013
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1749-1750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-427]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 11604]


Maine Disaster <greek-i> ME-00016 Declaration of Economic Injury

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) 
declaration for the State of Maine, dated 01/06/2009.
    Incident: Fire.
    Incident Period: 09/14/2008.

DATES: Effective Date: 01/06/2009.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/06/2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and

[[Page 1750]]

Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for economic injury 
disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Piscataquis.
Contiguous Counties: Maine: Aroostook, Penobscot, Somerset.
The Interest Rate is: 4.000.
    The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 116040.
    The State which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> is MAINE.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59002)

    Dated: January 6, 2009.
Sandy K. Baruah,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9-427 Filed 1-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Bailey v. Barkell

OP 16-0728

12/20/16

Denied

Original Proceeding Habeas Corpus
No. 11-316.

#### United States Steel Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Brian K. Milward, et ux.

565 U.S. 1111, 132 S. Ct. 1002,

181 L. Ed. 2d 734,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 229.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 639 F.3d 11.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (adopted pursuantto §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief FinancialOfficer of Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarterly period ended January 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperation of the Company.

 

Date:  March 17,2010

 
|   |                      |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | /s/  Edward O. Irion      |
|   |                      |
|   | Edward  O. Irion          |
|   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          12,564
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,534
<ALLOWANCES>                                       679
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,692,714
<DEPRECIATION>                                 277,065
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,650,756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,528,503
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,900,556
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,650,756
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               142,979
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,007
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,426
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 45,433
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,343
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    45,591
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62


</TABLE>
# C_2016312EN.01002201.xml

| 26.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/22

---

Corrigendum to Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 March 2016 to 31 March 2016

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 154 of 29 April 2016
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 154 of 29 April 2016

(2016/C 312/03)

On page 6:

for:

for:

| ‘— | Suspension of a marketing authorisation (Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) |
| --- | --- |

‘—

Suspension of a marketing authorisation (Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

Suspension of a marketing authorisation

| Date of the decision | Name of the medicinal product | Holder of the marketing authorisation | Number of the entry in the Community Register | Date of notification |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 23.3.2016 | Zydelig | Gilead Sciences International Limited
  Cambridge CB21 6GT, United Kingdom | EU/1/14/938 | 30.3.2016’ |

Date of the decision

Name of the medicinal product

Holder of the marketing authorisation

Number of the entry in the Community Register

Date of notification

23.3.2016

Zydelig

Gilead Sciences International Limited

Cambridge CB21 6GT, United Kingdom

EU/1/14/938

30.3.2016’

read:

read:

| ‘— | Modification of a marketing authorisation (Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) |
| --- | --- |

‘—

Modification of a marketing authorisation (Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

Modification of a marketing authorisation

| Date of the decision | Name of the medicinal product | Holder of the marketing authorisation | Number of the entry in the Community Register | Date of notification |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 23.3.2016 | Zydelig | Gilead Sciences International Limited
  Cambridge CB21 6GT, United Kingdom | EU/1/14/938 | 30.3.2016’ |

Date of the decision

Name of the medicinal product

Holder of the marketing authorisation

Number of the entry in the Community Register

Date of notification

23.3.2016

Zydelig

Gilead Sciences International Limited

Cambridge CB21 6GT, United Kingdom

EU/1/14/938

30.3.2016’

---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 15, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 15, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21I0053. LU ANNE ESPOSITO v. KATHY SCOTT. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 17102611
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 39667

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

JOSHUA ALAN DAVIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2012 Unpublished Opinion No. 715

Filed: November 13, 2012

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Canyon County. Hon. Bradly S. Ford, District Judge. 

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Jason C. Pintler, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Joshua Alan Davis pled guilty to burglary. I.C. § 18-1401. The district court sentenced 

Davis to a unified term of seven years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years. 

The district court suspended the sentence and placed Davis on probation. Davis served 

numerous periods of discretionary jail time while on probation, participated in the retained 

jurisdiction program, and ultimately admitted to violating the terms of his probation. The district 

court revoked Davis’s probation and ordered execution of his suspended sentence. Davis filed 

an I.C.R 35 motion, which the district court denied. Davis appeals.

A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency, 

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton, 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d 

23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee, 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In 
2

presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of 

new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the 

motion. State v. Huffman, 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the 

record, including the new information submitted with Davis’s Rule 35 motion, we conclude no 

abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court’s order denying Davis’s 

Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32 (b)

I
hereby certify that this Form 10-Q, containing Bank One Corporations consolidated
financial statements as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and the information contained in this Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

August 7, 2003

| |  | /s/ Heidi Miller
Heidi MillerChief Financial Officer
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------

78

---
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 148 (Monday, August 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 41226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20580]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    DOC has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for 
clearance the following proposal for collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of the Census.
    Title: Current Industrial Reports (Wave II Mandatory).
    Form Number(s): M20J, M20L, M20N, M22P, MQ23A, MQ23X, MQ35W, MA22F, 
MA22K, MA22Q, MA24T, MA28A, MA28B, MA28C, MA28G, MA31A, MA33L, MA35L, 
MA35P, MA36E, MA36M, MA36Q, MA38R.
    Agency Approval Number: 0607-0395.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Burden: 27,636.
    Number of Respondents: 17,273.
    Avg Hours Per Response: About 45 minutes.
    Needs and Uses: The Current Industrial Reports (CIR) program is a 
series of monthly, quarterly, and annual surveys which provide key 
measures of production, shipments, and/or inventories on a national 
basis for selected manufactured products. Government agencies, business 
firms, trade associations, and private research and consulting 
organizations use these data to make trade policy, production, and 
investment decisions.
    For clearance purposes, the approximately 72 CIR surveys are 
divided into `waves.' Each wave has an associated voluntary and 
mandatory clearance package, making 6 separate clearances. Each year, 
one wave (2 clearance packages) is submitted for review. This year we 
are submitting the voluntary and mandatory clearance packages for wave 
II. There are no planned changes to the mandatory forms, only a request 
for a three-year extension of OMB approval.
    Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit organizations.
    Frequency: Monthly, Quarterly, and Annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C. , Sections 61, 81, 131, 182, 224, 
and 225.
    OMB Desk Officer: Nancy Kirkendall, (202) 395-7313.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, 
(202) 482-3272, Department of Commerce, room 5327, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to Nancy Kirkendall, OMB Desk Officer, room 10201, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: July 28, 1998.
Linda Engelmeier,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information 
Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-20580 Filed 7-31-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P
```