alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Montana Eleventh Judicial District Court. County of Flathead.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- DOM L. TUMLIN, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-13-323

DECISION

On December 11, 2014, the Court sentenced the Defendant to the Montana State Prison for a term of twenty (20) years, to run consecutive to his sentence from Lewis and Clark County, for the offense of Burglary, a Felony, in violation of §45-6-204(1), MCA. The Defendant was given credit for two hundred thirty one (231) days served in custody pending final disposition in this matter (April 17, 2014 to December 11, 2014). In addition to court ordered costs and fees, the Defendant was ordered to pay a fine of $1,000 and restitution in the amount of $32, 240.21 to Liberty Mutual Insurance and $4, 443.51 to victim Matt Kinsella.

On November 18, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Peter Ohman of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was represented by Flathead County Deputy Attorney Travis Ahner.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

It is the unanimous decision of the Division that the Defendant’s sentence *117be MODIFIED. The District Court departed from the plea agreement without written reasons in the Judgment and imposed the maximum sentence with no time suspended. The recommendation of the parties and the Pre-Sentence Investigation author was that Mr. Tumlin receive 20 years to the Montana State Prison with twelve (12) years suspended. Without a record as to why the suspended time was eliminated, the Division finds the sentence clearly excessive. The Division’s decision is that the Defendant’s new sentence be twenty (20) years to the Montana State Prison with twelve (12) years suspended to run consecutively to his sentence from Lewis and Clark County.

Done in open Court this 18th day of November, 2016.

DATED this 8th day of December, 2016.

The remaining terms and conditions of the sentence imposed are not clearly inadequate or clearly excessive and are AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4806 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4806

To prohibit defense contractors from requiring licenses or fees for use 
                of military likenesses and designations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 2006

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit defense contractors from requiring licenses or fees for use 
                of military likenesses and designations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Toy Replica Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DEFENSE CONTRACTORS REQUIRING LICENSES OR FEES 
              FOR USE OF MILITARY LIKENESSES AND DESIGNATIONS.

    The Secretary of Defense shall require that any contract entered 
into or renewed by the Department of Defense include a provision 
prohibiting the contractor from requiring toy and hobby manufacturers, 
distributors, or merchants to obtain licenses from or pay fees to the 
contractor for the use of military likenesses or designations on items 
provided under the contract.
                                 <all>
```
ACCEPTED

01-14-00774-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/10/2015 11:59:49 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/10/2015 11:59:49 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
ITEM: Crackers (CKR) MONOGRAPH NO.: KC1

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE: 199 Kilocalories.

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Square, evenly baked to light golden color except for edges that may be
light to dark brown. Surface contains numerous perforations.

ODOR: Very slightly toasted cracker. Yeast-like odor is often noticeable.

FLAVOR: Ranges from a salty cracker to bland cracker. Yeast-like flavor is often
noticeable.

TEXTURE Dry, flaky to crumbly.

DEFECTS LIKELY TO OCCUR:

APPEARANCE: Darkened (but not due to over baking at origin).

ODOR: Stale, cardboard, rancid.
FLAVOR: Stale, musty, bitter, rancid.
TEXTURE: Excessively dry and crumbly.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: When the package is first opened the
product should be smelled for off-odors. Odors that dissipate rapidly (i.e., musty, yeasty, slightly
rancid) should be noted but not scored as a surveillance defect provided no other condition factor
such as off-taste is also noted.

SPECIAL NOTES: Serviceability of the cracker is considered significantly affected when more
than 25% of the product's volume is crushed or reduced to crumbs. This item is vacuum packed,
but does not contain an inner liner. The flavor, odor, and texture is similar to, but not exactly like
a saltine soda cracker. The sealed bag shall continue to exhibit tight adherence to the large flat
surfaces of the contents when pulling force is applied at the center of each side seal. This force
shall be applied by holding each side seal between thumb and forefinger of each hand.

46
Montana Fourth Judicial District Court. County of Missoula.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- DANIEL JAMES FOX, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-14-430

DECISION

On April 9, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to twenty (20) years to the Montana State Prison, for the offense of Count III: Criminal Distribution of Dangerous Drugs - Narcotic or Opiate, a Felony, in violation of §45-9-101(2), MCA. The Court recommended the Defendant be screened for Nexus as early as possible. Upon the successful completion of the treatment, the Court advised the Defendant may petition the Court to suspend the remaining portion of his sentence. Defendant was granted credit for time served in the amount of 248 days at the rate of $100.00 per day toward Defendant’s fine. However, the amount of credit given could not exceed the total amount of fine due.

On May 6, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant appeared by video conferencing from Crossroads Correctional Center and was represented by Peter Ohman of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented. Judge John Larson appeared and testified.

*41Done in open Court this 6th day of May, 2016.

DATED this 10th day of June, 2016.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive. Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Moreover, as to issues raised during the course of this hearing regarding objections to referring to charges that were dismissed and presumably outside the record, it is the opinion of this Court, that crimes that were charged and later dismissed, are appropriate to be considered by the Sentence Review Division. Legal authority supports such consideration.

Defendant’s counsel objected to the sentencing judge appearing at the hearing and making a statement. The Division finds it appropriate to consider the statements of Judge Larson, made in person, in light of Rule 6 of the Sentence Review Division Rules of the Montana Supreme Court. Moreover, past practice has allowed any sentencing judge to appear. In this case, Judge Larson confined his remarks to the matters he considered at the time of sentencing.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member.
No. 11-6576.

#### Ronaldo Ligons, Petitioner v. John King, Warden.

565 U.S. 1175, 132 S. Ct. 1140,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1013,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 655.

January 17, 2012.

Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied.

*1014Former decision, 565 U.S. 992, 132 S. Ct. 534, 181 L. Ed. 2d 374, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7704.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4679 

To amend the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, to 

require the Attorney General to make available on the Internet website 

of the Department of Justice all registration statements and other documents filed with the Attorney General under such Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2006 

Mrs. SCHMIDT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, 

as amended, to require the Attorney General to make 

available on the Internet website of the Department of 

Justice all registration statements and other documents 

filed with the Attorney General under such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FARA Sunshine Act 

5 of 2006’’. 
2 

•HR 4679 IH 

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO MAKE AVAILABLE ON THE 

2 INTERNET WEBSITE OF THE DEPARTMENT 

3 OF JUSTICE ALL REGISTRATION STATE4 MENTS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS FILED 

5 UNDER THE FOREIGN AGENTS REGISTRA6 TION ACT OF 1938, AS AMENDED. 

7 Section 6 of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 

8 1938, as amended (22 U.S.C. 616), is amended by adding 

9 at the end the following new subsection: 

10 ‘‘(d) The Attorney General shall make available on 

11 the Internet website of the Department of Justice all reg12 istration statements and supplements thereto filed under 

13 section 2 of this Act, all informational materials filed 

14 under section 4 of this Act, and any other documents filed 

15 with the Attorney General under this Act.’’. 

Æ
<PAGE>


Exhibit 99.1




                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


         Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Insignia Financial Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's
knowledge, information and belief, that

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003
(the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  May 14, 2003
                                                   /s/Andrew L. Farkas
                                                   -----------------------
                                                   Andrew L. Farkas
                                                   Chief Executive Officer


Dated: May 14, 2003
                                                   /s/James A. Aston
                                                   -----------------------
                                                   James A. Aston
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                 |                          |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                 | /s/                Po Nei Sze |
|   | Po                Nei Sze Chief                Financial OfficerDate:                August 17, 2007 |

----
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 99 (a)

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I hereby certify that this Form 10-Q, containing Bank One Corporation's
consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2003,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



May 8, 2003                                             /s/ James Dimon
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                           James Dimon
                                                    Chief Executive Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Bank One Corporation and will be retained by Bank One
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

                                       67
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-4059

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CRAIG LAMONT MYERS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CR03-484-PJM) Submitted: October 21, 2005 Decided: November 14, 2005 Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard A. Finci, HOULON, BERMAN, BERGMAN, FINCI & LEVENSTEIN, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Mythili Raman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Craig Lamont Myers pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000), and the district court sentenced him to 210 months’ imprisonment. Myers appeals, contending that his sentence, which was imposed under the then-mandatory federal sentencing guidelines, violates United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). The Government asserts that Myers validly waived the right to appeal his sentence in the plea agreement. We agree with the Government and dismiss the appeal. A defendant may waive the right to appeal if that waiver is knowing and intelligent. United States v. Brown , 232 F.3d 399, 402-03 (4th Cir. 2000). To determine whether a waiver is knowing and intelligent, we examine “the totality of the circumstances, including the experience and conduct of the accused, as well as the accused’s educational background and familiarity with the terms of the plea agreement.” United States v. General , 278 F.3d 389, 400 (4th Cir. 2002) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). We review de novo the question of whether a defendant validly waived his right to appeal. United States v. Blick , 408 F.3d 162, 168 (4th Cir. 2005). Our review of the plea agreement and the hearing conducted pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 leads us to conclude that Myers knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal.- 3 - See General , 278 F.3d at 400-01; see alsoBlick , 408 F.3d at 169-73 (holding that a plea agreement containing a waiver of the right to appeal, which was accepted by district court prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in Booker , was not invalidated by change in law effected by that decision). Moreover, Myers’ claim under Booker falls within the scope of the waiver. See Blick , 408 F.3d at 170 (holding Bookerclaim is covered by appellate waiver). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 11-7263.

#### Phillip Wood, Petitioner v. John Main.

565 U.S. 1161, 132 S. Ct. 1100,

181 L. Ed. 2d 987,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 881,

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
No. 09-8197.

#### Sherrod Tillis, Petitioner v. Illinois.

559 U.S. 951, 130 S. Ct. 1535,

176 L. Ed. 2d 133,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1159.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 387 Ill. App. 3d 1182, 367 Ill. Dec. 213, 981 N.E.2d 538.
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

Monograph No. BE4 

23 September 2004 

NSN: 8940-01-395-4611 

Item: Chili Con Carne with Beans, Cooked, Dehydrated 

Document: PCR-C-059, Chili Con Carne with Beans, Cooked, Dehydrated, Packaged in a No. 

10 Metal Can, Shelf Stable 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: NA Component Classification: Primary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80oF; 6 months at 100oF 

Item Characteristics

Appearance: 

Dry product shall be a distinct reddish brown color with distinct kidney beans and 

coarse ground beef pieces. 

Prepared product shall show water penetration through all particles and shall be a 

mixture of coarsely ground beef, light red kidney beans in a tomato-based sauce, with 

onions and spices. 

Odor: 

Dry product shall be cooked bean, beef and tomato with chili spices. 

Prepared product shall be cooked beef and kidney beans in a tomato based sauce, with 

onions and chili spices. 

Flavor: Prepared product shall be cooked beef and kidney beans in a tomato based sauce, with 

onions and chili spices. Shall have medium to high heat flavor. 

Texture: Prepared product shall have moist and tender ground beef. Kidney beans shall be 

slightly soft to slightly firm. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Dehydrated pieces may be very hard or tacky. 

Prepared product may darken or loose color of sauce, meat and beans. 

Odor: Cardboard, oxidized, rancid, scorched, burnt, sour. 

Flavor: Cardboard, oxidized, rancid, scorched, burnt, sour, loss of spice. 

Texture: 

Dry product may become very hard, tacky, crystalline beef. 

Prepared product may not rehydrate completely, and may have chewy, dry or mushy 

beef and beans. 

Monograph No. BE4, Page 1 of 2 Pages 
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

Monograph No. BE4 

23 September 2004 

NSN: 8940-01-395-4611 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Prepare as directed on label. 

Monograph No. BE4, Page 2 of 2 Pages
Letter extending Management Agreement with Willowbridge Associates Inc.



 Exhibit 10.4(b) 
 June 1, 2011 
 Willowbridge Associates Inc. 

101 Morgan Lane — Suite 180 

Plainsboro, N.J. 08536 
 Attention: Mr Steve R.
Crane 
 Re:  Management Agreement Renewals 
 Dear Mr. Crane: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2012 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

  

	 	•	 	 Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II 



 

	 	•	 	 Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Institutional Futures Portfolio LP 


  

	 	•	 	 CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Orion Futures Fund (Cayman) Ltd. 


  

	 	•	 	 CTA Capital LLC 


 Please
acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-296-1302.

  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jennifer Magro

		 	Jennifer Magro
		 	Chief Financial Officer & Director
	
	WILLOWBRIDGE ASSOCIATES INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Stephen R. Crane

	Print Name: Stephen R. Crane
	JM/sr