alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016077EN.01000201.xml

| 27.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/2

---

Notice for the attention of persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus

(2016/C 77/03)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities designated in the Annex to Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/280 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/276 (4) concerning restrictive measures against Belarus.

1

2

3

4

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons and entities designated in the aboveentioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2012/642/CFSP and Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 should continue to apply to those persons. The grounds for designations of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 3 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council before 31 December 2016, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu. |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu.

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review, pursuant to Article 8(2) of Decision 2012/642/CFSP and Article 8a(4) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, of the list of designated persons and entities.

---

(1)  OJ L 285, 17.10.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 52, 27.2.2016, p. 30.

2

(3)  OJ L 134, 20.5.2006, p. 1.

3

(4)  OJ L 52, 27.2.2016, p. 19.

4

---
No. 11-629.

#### Herman S. Ransom, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1115, 132 S. Ct. 1046,

181 L. Ed. 2d 740,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 221.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

*741Same case below, 642 F.3d 1285.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra,

 Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2011 

y0620 

Order 

 

June 28, 2011 

142793 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142793 

 COA: 294920 

Calhoun CC: 2009-001532-FC 

RONALD ALAN BISH, a/k/a RONALD ALLEN 

BISH, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 3, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
7 November 2019 ********************

NSN: 8960-01-582-6624 (CPDP) * MONOGRAPH M71

 ******************** 

1

Item: Chocolate Protein Drink Powder (Flavor I)

Document: PCR-C-082B, Chocolate Protein Drink Powder, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf 

Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 240 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Powdered product: Uniform blend of dry homogenous ingredients with a medium to 

dark brown color with no discernable lumps (see Special Notes).

Hydrated product: Uniform medium to dark brown color with no discernable lumps.

Odor: Powdered product: Dark chocolate and sweet dairy.

Hydrated product: Sweet cocoa.

Flavor: Hydrated product: Semi-sweet chocolate and sweet dairy.

Texture:

Powdered product: Free flowing with no discernable lumps (see Special Notes).

Hydrated product: Smooth, creamy with a moderately thick consistency with no 

discernable lumps or chalkiness.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance:

Powdered product: Caking, lumpiness, dark specks, darkened areas (see Special 

Notes).

Hydrated product: Darkening, browning.

Odor: 

Powdered product: Moderate loss of dark chocolate and sweet dairy odor, scorched, 

oxidized, rancid, non-typical odor.

Hydrated product: Moderate loss of sweet cocoa odor, scorched, oxidized, rancid, nontypical odor.

Flavor: Hydrated product: Moderate loss of semi-sweet chocolate and sweet dairy flavor, 

scorched, oxidized, rancid, non-typical flavor.

Texture:

Powdered product: Caked, lumpy (see Special Notes).

Hydrated product: Not smooth, not creamy, not moderately thick or has discernable 

lumps, chalkiness or sedimentation.
7 November 2019 ********************

NSN: 8960-01-582-6624 (CPDP) * MONOGRAPH M71

 ******************** 

2

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Initial examination should be done in the dry state; final examination and evaluation should be done 

after hydration following package instructions. Even if product is caked, it should be reconstituted to 

determine the report for future reference.

Special Notes

Product may contain small lumps that are of no concern provided they break or fall apart under light 

finger pressure.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. §1350



In connection with the quarterly report of Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Alan P. Niedzwiecki, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This Certification has not been, and shall not be
deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.



Date: March 10, 2004



/s/    ALAN P. NIEDZWIECKIAlan P. Niedzwiecki President and Chief Executive Officer
Order entered May 6, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00264-CR

EX PARTE ORLANDO GUTIERREZ

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. WX13-90023-W

ORDER

By order entered March 6, 2014, the Court set this accelerated appeal for submission on 

June 2, 2014 and ordered appellant to file his brief by April 18, 2014. By order entered April 23, 

2014, the Court granted appellant’s motion for extension and reset the due dates for appellant’s 

and the State’s briefs. The time to file appellant’s brief was extended to May 2, 2014. Both 

orders stated that if a party did not submit its brief by the date specified, the appeal would be 

submitted without that party’s brief. Appellant did not file his brief by the extended due date. 

Instead, appellant has filed a May 2, 2014 second motion for extension of time to file appellant’s 

brief. Appellant’s second motion for extension is DENIED. 

We ORDER this appeal submitted without appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 31.1. 

/s/ JIM MOSELEY 

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4588]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 30, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Steve Foley, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. RMB Holdings, LLC, and ATB Management, LLC, both of Birmingham, 
Alabama, to become bank holding companies by acquiring up to 30 percent 
of the voting shares of Americus Financial Services, Inc., and its 
subsidiary, Red Mountain Bank, N.A., both of Birmingham, Alabama.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 27, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-4588 Filed 3-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
No. 09-7920.

#### Frank Bowman, Petitioner v. Matthew Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

559 U.S. 945, 130 S. Ct. 1516,

176 L. Ed. 2d 124,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1097.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 339 Fed. Appx. 707.
Order filed April 2, 2020 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00118-CV

____________

ERMA L. WILKINS AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS OF 16914 SQUARE 

RIGGER LN., FRIENDSWOOD, TX. 77546, Appellants

V.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE IN 

TRUST FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF MORGAN 

STANLEY ABS CAPITAL 1 INC. TRUST 2004-HE2 MORTGAGE 

PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2004-HE2 ITS 

SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS, Appellees

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1145541

O R D E R

Appellants’ brief was due March 4, 2020. No brief or motion for extension 

of time has been filed. 

Unless appellants file a brief with this court on or before May 4, 2020, the 

court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Spain.
# C_2016107EN.01001101.xml

| 22.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/11

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 107/06)

| Member State | Spain |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Gran Canaria — Tenerife Sur
  Gran Canaria — El Hierro
  Tenerife Norte — La Gomera
  Gran Canaria — La Gomera |
| Period of validity of the contract | 2 years following the start of the operations |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 2 months following the date of publication of this notice |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | Ministerio de Fomento |
| Dirección General de Aviación Civil |
| Subdirección General de Transporte Aéreo |
| Paseo de la Castellana 67 |
| 28071 Madrid |
| España |
| Tel. +34 915977505 |
| Fax +34 915978643 |
| Email: osp.dgac@fomento.es |

Member State

Spain

Concerned routes

Gran Canaria — Tenerife Sur

Gran Canaria — El Hierro

Tenerife Norte — La Gomera

Gran Canaria — La Gomera

Period of validity of the contract

2 years following the start of the operations

Deadline for submission of tenders

2 months following the date of publication of this notice

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

Ministerio de Fomento

Dirección General de Aviación Civil

Subdirección General de Transporte Aéreo

Paseo de la Castellana 67

28071 Madrid

España

Tel. +34 915977505

Fax +34 915978643

Email: osp.dgac@fomento.es

---
No. 11-7489.

#### Atropin Palmer, Petitioner v. Rob Jeffreys, Warden.

565 U.S. 1180, 132 S. Ct. 1147,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1021,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 975.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Ross County, denied.
No. 11-6451.

#### Eliberto Vega Noriega, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 1064, 132 S. Ct. 765,

181 L. Ed. 2d 493,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8502.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Letter Agreement



 Exhibit 10.58 

January 19, 2012 
 Mr. H. Scott Kirkpatrick, Jr. 
 13 Donizetti Street 

Wellesley, MA 02482 
  

	 	Re:	Good Reason Process Extension 

 Dear
Scott: 
 As you are aware, on March 10, 2011, you and The Princeton Review, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a
letter agreement (the “March 10 Letter Agreement”) to extend the period for a “Good Reason” termination, as the term “Good Reason” is defined in the Executive Employment Agreement between you and the Company dated
effective November 30, 2009. The purpose of this letter agreement is to further amend your Executive Employment Agreement with the Company and to amend the March 10 Letter Agreement to extend further the “Good Reason” termination
period, as set forth below. 
 Accordingly, the Company and you hereby agree that Section 2 of the March 10 Letter
Agreement is revised and restated in its entirety as follows: 
 2. Extension of Period for Good Reason Termination.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 7(a)(iii)(E), you shall have one year from the date of commencement of a permanent CEO of the Company as contemplated above to terminate your employment for Good Reason as a result of
Mr. Perik’s resignation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event a permanent CEO has not commenced employment on or before June 30, 2012, or in the event Mr. Connolly is named as the Company’s permanent CEO prior to
June 30, 2012, then you shall have until August 1, 2012 to terminate your employment for Good Reason as a result of Mr. Perik’s resignation. You agree to provide the Company with at least 30 days written notice prior to any such
termination. 
 Except as otherwise amended above, the March 10 Letter Agreement shall remain unchanged and is hereby confirmed as being in
full force and effect. Please acknowledge your agreement to the foregoing by executing this letter agreement where indicated below and returning it to the Company. 







 H. Scott Kirkpatrick, Jr. 
 January 19, 2012 
  Page
 2
 
  
  

 

			
	Sincerely,
	
	THE PRINCETON REVIEW, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ John M. Connolly

		 	John M. Connolly
		 	Chief Executive Officer


 CONFIRMED AND AGREED 
  

	
	 /s/ H. Scott Kirkpatrick, Jr.

	H. Scott Kirkpatrick, Jr.
	
	January 19, 2012
17 April 2014 ******************************

NSN: 8940-01-419-1562 (WIT) * MONOGRAPH NO: FPS/GP 05A

 ****************************** 

Item: Wintergreen Tablets

Document: PCR-W-002, Wintergreen Tablets, Packaged in a Flexible Package, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 100 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 60 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Individually wrapped, intact tablets. Round, white tablets with a dull surface.

Odor: Sweet wintergreen.

Flavor: Sweet wintergreen.

Texture: Firm, not hard or brittle.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Worn edges, excessive crumble, darkening or graying.

Odor: Diminished wintergreen/mint, low sweet, sour, chemical note, alcohol.

Flavor: Decreased wintergreen/mint, perfume, chemical, alcohol.

Texture: Excessively firm, hard to bite, increased chalkiness, powdery, increased grittiness.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Check odor on just opened package for best evaluation of quality.

Special Notes

NA
No. 11-6548.

#### Randall S. Jones, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 1041, 132 S. Ct. 590,

181 L. Ed. 2d 433,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8124.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 644 F.3d 1206.
No. 11-7429.

#### Michael Lindner, Petitioner v. Arizona.

565 U.S. 1165, 132 S. Ct. 1111,

181 L. Ed. 2d 993,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 824.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One, denied.

Same case below, 227 Ariz. 69, 252 P.3d 1033.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3362 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 17, 2019 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend title 49, United State Code, to require small 

hub airports to construct areas for nursing mothers, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3362 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Airport Mothers’ 

3 Rooms Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. MOTHERS’ ROOMS. 

5 Section 47107(w) of title 49, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘In fiscal year 

8 2021’’ and all that follows through ‘‘the Secretary of 

9 Transportation’’ and inserting ‘‘The Secretary of 

10 Transportation’’; 

11 (2) in paragraph (1)(B) by striking ‘‘one men’s 

12 and one women’s’’ and inserting ‘‘at least one men’s 

13 and at least one women’s’’; 

14 (3) by striking paragraph (2)(A) and inserting 

15 the following: 

16 ‘‘(A) AIRPORT SIZE.—The requirements in 

17 paragraph (1) shall only apply to applications 

18 submitted by the airport sponsor of— 

19 ‘‘(i) a medium or large hub airport in 

20 fiscal year 2021 and each fiscal year there21 after; and 

22 ‘‘(ii) a small hub airport in fiscal year 

23 2023 and each fiscal year thereafter, but 

24 only if such airport has been categorized as 

25 a small or medium hub airport for the 3 

26 consecutive fiscal years prior to the fiscal 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3362 RDS

1 year in which the application is sub2 mitted.’’; 

3 (4) in paragraph (2)(B) by striking ‘‘the date 

4 of enactment of this Act complies with the require5 ment in paragraph (1)’’ and inserting ‘‘October 5, 

6 2018, complies with the requirement in paragraph 

7 (1)(A)’’; and 

8 (5) in paragraph (2)(C) by striking ‘‘paragraph 

9 (1)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (1)(A)’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 16, 

2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
No. 11-7197.

#### Johnetta Sullivan, Petitioner v. Clarice Stovall, Warden.

565 U.S. 1126, 132 S. Ct. 1034,

181 L. Ed. 2d 761,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 341.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
ITEM: Soy Sauce, fermented, ************************

10 oz. Bottle, Type 1 * MONOGRAPH: 7B6

************************

(SOY) Ancillary

NSN: 8950-01-393-8422 ITEM SPECIFICATION: CID A-A 20087

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Clear dark-brown and practically free of sediment. 

ODOR: Typical oriental soy sauce.

FLAVOR: Well-blended, palatable, tart, and salty flavor. 

TEXTURE: Fluid and practically free of sediment.

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36 months

 100 DEGREES F: 6 months

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

APPEARANCE: May darken.

ODOR: Musty.

FLAVOR: Musty.

TEXTURE: Increased sediments.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None.