alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
SEC FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>      0001063761
<NAME>     SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          7,222
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   3,120<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               10,342
<PP&E>                                          7,573
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,317
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 51,953
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           8,517
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,236
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   51,953<F2>
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                7,323
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  12,076
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                290
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (3,862)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (3,862)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2,796)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (1.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.61)
<FN>
<F1> Receivables are stated net of allowances.
<F2> Includes limited partners' interest in the SRC Operating Partnership of
     $5,051.
</FN>




</TABLE>
No. 11-7104.

#### Berry Carr, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1084, 132 S. Ct. 827,

181 L. Ed. 2d 536,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8672.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 652 F.3d 811.
No. 11-572.

#### Countrywide Financial Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. David H. Luther, et al.

565 U.S. 1080, 132 S. Ct. 832,

181 L. Ed. 2d 527,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8743.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.

Same case below, 195 Cal. App. 4th 789, 125 Cal. Rptr. 3d 716.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           7,853
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,855
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,849
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,288
<PP&E>                                          12,841
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,466)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,388
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,432
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,653
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,770
<SALES>                                         63,188
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,188
<CGS>                                           44,985
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (72)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,774
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,660
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,114
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,114
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.89


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S (I) CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND (II)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED
IN THE FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      18,339,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,077,000<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  6,932,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            46,450,000
<PP&E>                                     176,194,000<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             246,398,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,860,000
<BONDS>                                     99,282,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       14,438,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,926,000<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               246,398,000
<SALES>                                     39,426,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            39,426,000
<CGS>                                       34,446,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,446,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,231,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,403,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,867,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   397,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,470,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,470,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F4>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F4>
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNT REPRESENTS NET ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE.
<F2>AMOUNT REPRESENTS NET PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT.
<F3>AMOUNT REPRESENTS ADDITIONAL PAID IN CAPITAL AND RETAINED EARNINGS.
<F4>ONLY REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC EQUITY OFFERINGS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
LESTER HACKLEY,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-5767

Opinion filed August 12, 2014.

Amended Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

Michael Ufferman, Tallahassee, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The amended petition seeking belated appeal is denied on the merits. 

VAN NORTWICK, RAY, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 4220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-2062]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Worcester Polytechnic Institute, et al.; Notice of Consolidated 
Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments

    This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 
(Pub. L. 89-651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be 
viewed between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instruments described below, 
for such purposes as each is intended to be used, is being manufactured 
in the United States.
    Docket Number: 97-089. Applicant: Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 
Worcester, MA 01609. Instrument: Fire Modeling Research Apparatus. 
Manufacturer: Fire Testing Technology Ltd., United Kingdom. Intended 
Use: See notice at 62 FR 61092, November 14, 1997. Reasons: The foreign 
instrument provides: (1) anti-vibration mountings on top of the frame 
and in the test area, (2) a pressure transducer to compensate for 
atmospheric pressure fluctuations, (3) an enclosed-case housing for the 
load cell and (4) compatibility with an existing cone calorimeter. 
Advice received from: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 
December 24, 1997.
    Docket Number: 97-092. Applicant: University of Wisconsin, Madison, 
WI 53706. Instrument: Flame Ionization Detector System, Model HFR400. 
Manufacturer: Cambustion Ltd., United Kingdom. Intended Use: See notice 
at 62 FR 62287, November 21, 1997. Reasons: The foreign instrument 
provides a time constant of less than 4.0 ms for measuring hydrocarbon 
emissions during transients of a gasoline engine. Advice received from: 
National Institute of Standards and Technology, December 23, 1997.
    The National Institute of Standards and Technology advises that (1) 
the capabilities of each of the foreign instruments described above are 
pertinent to each applicant's intended purpose and (2) it knows of no 
domestic instrument or apparatus of equivalent scientific value for the 
intended use of each instrument.
    We know of no other instrument or apparatus being manufactured in 
the United States which is of equivalent scientific value to either of 
the foreign instruments.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 98-2062 Filed 1-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4657 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4657

   To amend title 18, United States Code, to prevent the selling of 
          telephone customer proprietary network information.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2006

Mr. Lipinski (for himself and Mr. Case) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 18, United States Code, to prevent the selling of 
          telephone customer proprietary network information.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Secure Telephone Operations Act of 
2006''.

SEC. 2. SALE OF TELEPHONE CUSTOMER PROPRIETARY NETWORK INFORMATION.

    (a) Prohibition.--Chapter 88 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1802. Sale of telephone customer proprietary network information
    ``(a) Whoever knowingly sells telephone customer proprietary 
network information shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not 
more than 10 years, or both.
    ``(b) In this section, the term `telephone customer proprietary 
network information' means customer proprietary network information as 
that term is defined in section 222 of the Communications Act of 
1934.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment to Table of Sections.--The table of sections 
at the beginning of chapter 88 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new item:

``1802. Sale of telephone customer proprietary network information''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2016336EN.01000302.xml

| 13.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/3

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2016/C 336/04)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 1.7.2016 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 1.7.2016–31.12.2016 |
| Member State | Portugal |
| Stock or Group of stocks | MAC/8C3411 |
| Species | Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) |
| Zone | VIIIc, IX and X; Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 17/TQ72 |

Date and time of closure

1.7.2016

Duration

1.7.2016–31.12.2016

Member State

Portugal

Stock or Group of stocks

MAC/8C3411

Species

Mackerel (Scomber scombrus)

(Scomber scombrus)

Zone

VIIIc, IX and X; Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

17/TQ72

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6363 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LEONARD SHELTON MCCULLOUGH, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Frank W. Bullock,

Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:96-cr-00195-FWB; 1:05-cv-00785-FWB)

Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: July 3, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leonard Shelton McCullough, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett

Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Leonard Shelton McCullough, Jr., seeks to appeal the

district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000) motion. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that McCullough has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
HEADQUARTERS, UNITED STATES ARMY VETERINARY COMMAND
2050 WORTH ROAD, SUITE 5
FORT SAM HOUSTON, TEXAS 78234-6005

REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF

MCVS-FA 29 January 2003

MEMORANDUM FOR Commanders, Regional Veterinary Commands

SUBJECT: Listing of Pasteurized Fruit Juice Facilities in the United States

1, The 2002 Food Risk Evaluation Committee recommended and the Chief, U.S. Army
Veterinary Corps approved the recommendation NOT to require listing for pasteurized fruit juice
producing/processing facilities within the United States.

2. Effective immediately all juice facilities that fall into this category may be delisted at the
District Veterinary Command Commander's discretion. District Veterinary Command
Commanders will request delisting on an individual basis.

3. Commanders are reminded that non-pasteurized fruit juices will continue to be banned from
Department of Defense (DOD) procurement.

4. Our point of contact is Mr. Robert Kilburn, DOD Approved Sources Division, DSN 471-6547
or Commercial (210) 221-6547.

CHARLES EY, JR.
Colonel, V
Commanging

CF:

HQDA DODVSA-ZA, 5109 Leesburg Pike, Suite 621, Falls Church, VA 22041-3258

Director (MCCS-HV), U.S. Army Medical Department Center and School, 2250 Stanley Road,
Suite 270, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234-6145

Staff Veterinarian (MR-Q), Army and Air Force Exchange Service, PO Box 660202, Dallas, TX
75266-0202

Staff Veterinarian, HQ Defense Commissary Agency, 11200 38th Street and E Avenue,
Fort Lee, VA 23801-6300

Chief, Directorate of Subsistence (DSCP-HS), Defense Supply Center Philadelphia, 700 Robbins
Avenue, Building 6, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5092

Commander (VS-HQ), 100th Medical Detachment, CMR 442, APO AE 09042-1100

Commander, 106th Medical Detachment VS, Unit 15252, APO AP 96205-0025

Theater Veterinarian, Veterinary Svcs Det Bahrain, PSC 451 Box Vet Svcs, FPO AE
09834-2800

Commanders, District Veterinary Commands
No. 11-6455.

#### Demarcus McClarin, Petitioner v. Georgia.

565 U.S. 1117, 132 S. Ct. 1004,

181 L. Ed. 2d 745,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 200.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.

Same case below, 289 Ga. 180, 710 S.E.2d 120.
No. 11-7071.

#### Allen E. Vaughn, Petitioner v. Bobbie James, et al.

565 U.S. 1122, 132 S. Ct. 1024,

181 L. Ed. 2d 755,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 29.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Power
Technology, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended October 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: December 19, 2002

                                           Unsigned
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Wolf Meyerfeld, President



                                            /s/ Lee A. Balak
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Lee A. Balak, Treasurer and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT NICHOLAS BRICE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-36 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed December 19, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Hunter W. Carroll, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and VILLANTI and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
# C_2016418EN.01002301.xml

| 12.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/23

---

Corrigendum to Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1983 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria applies

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 398 of 28 October 2016
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 398 of 28 October 2016

(2016/C 418/06)

On the cover, in the table of contents, and on page 5:

for:

for:

‘Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1983’,

read:

read:

‘Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1893’.

---
No. 11-7910.

#### Albert Leo Berrettini, Jr., aka Lee Berrettini, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1176, 132 S. Ct. 1162,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1016,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 953.

January 23, 2012.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until February 13, 2012, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Same case below, 431 Fed. Appx. 114.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132276 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132276 

 COA: 271516 

Genesee CC: 05-016202-FC 

AARON JERROD LLOYD,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 23, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1218 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 29, 2006 

 Clerk