alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3046 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of a 

military department to retain a reserve chaplain or reserve officer in 

a medical specialty beyond the date that such individual turns 68 years 

old. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 30, 2019 

Mr. MAST introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of a military department to retain a reserve 

chaplain or reserve officer in a medical specialty beyond 

the date that such individual turns 68 years old. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3046 IH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO DEFER MANDATORY SEPARA2 TION AT AGE 68 OF CHAPLAINS AND OFFI3 CERS IN MEDICAL SPECIALTIES IN THE RE4 SERVE COMPONENTS OF THE ARMED 

5 FORCES. 

6 Section 14703(b) of title 10, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘An’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) Subject 

9 to paragraph (2), an’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

11 paragraph (2): 

12 ‘‘(2) The Secretary concerned may, with the consent 

13 of the officer, retain in an active status an officer de14 scribed in subsection (a) beyond the date described in 

15 paragraph (1) of this subsection if the Secretary con16 cerned determines that such retention is necessary to the 

17 military department concerned. Each such retention shall 

18 be made on a case-by-case basis and for such period as 

19 the Secretary concerned determines appropriate.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
!"#$%&!  '# ($! )*+,--./0,1.23

456 $ 5 #7 8&59!56)*+:;<2=;<,>*;2?@3 $ 5 #7

A!&9&!5&55 B$ !&$ CD:EFG;=22;F0:H>;IFJ;,;2,>KL*MN:K23

&O! %&9$&P!$

5&%Q !$R$ 9#&!6

8SS$R5

$!$!!& %'TTUTASA

&

$ 5 V64T B&$W6$ 5

S&9 5B$& ! B$ !&$" 5!  #7UTTU5UX8

TST! YST

S5&5)JZZ*[Z\]^3

__`a
bcc

	




defghijfklmhfnfopiqrsrtgtrikrpgmfkofogppftuinterkvtfmwxydefeilngkoogtfpzfsrurfouinnfsfrztiu{uufnp rpf|tfkofo} ~

C~~~~~B&W B6 &$R! QW59! $Y5&%

#W&$5!&5B %$# B BB#  %% &!55&#$B59&6W!($ ! B6  BB~~

~~PP~~~~~

P~~~~~~

~C~~~~

 ~~~~~~~~~P~

T&$$ !!&!5&## #& !5&&)*+=2H/=2K3

&%$%&! 55#&! )J-20/+I,H;<:=/;I3%$%&!B %!9&9&5!%$ !&$ 5! 

!9S&

O

%& Y!95$ !&$" 59 5B5 BW$%&59!&Y$%&!CH0<,G0<,>2G/>-,I/>:++/02F,--=:-=/,;/:>  K,;2F2;0EB %!9P#&! %&% 6 BB&7S7C



$%##W9!&W&9!!5! #&! &% 6 B



`c$ O ~P ~~~~ ~~~~`

5$# ! B&9!59!"9 5B$& !C=,>/2K1ING20;/:><2,K/>GF/>0.HK/>G:./0/;,;/:>0:>;=,0;GH120;?,;;2=<2=2+2,G/1.2E3

~~P~~~V&S&PP~~

'&!&9&!5W B!)[I-2:=-=/>;3

!!8'SUSU'TUAS8S

#~~~


	 CYSUA7

#~&B&CA$B'7T7

'$ !&$ " BB  4!5& B&9$&

)J/>,;H=2:+-2=G:>,H;<:=/2K;:G/>3 )J/>,;H=2:+N:>;=,0;/>++/02=3

4&!&9&!5W B$ !&$! BB$C[I-2:=-=/>;

¡g¢£¤simzqftrk¥vtfmp¦gkow§}gkonftlnkrk¥

5W& ### 

!$##W6$%&!

8SS !&Y!

#%W&5W#%&#&VU'SV4

&

~~9~ ~

59 SST8T'8788T8~9~ ~ ̈~

5W& ### 

!$##W6$%&!

8SS !&Y!

#%W&5W#%&#&VU'SV4

&

'$5&!5

9

TST7! YST

4$5&!5

O



B&'TT7U



5 %)J-20/+I;I-2:+?:K/+/0,;/:>,>K,H;<:=/;I3

4$

7BB$Y5&

$~~

(

$ !&$5$ 5

#SSSTS

T&9!59!"9 5B$& !! 

CO

$%$R !

V&&9!59! B W$& !! 

V5&5CJZZ*[Z\]]

_`a
cc
b	

	



©

	
a

`

a_«`

c¬_	­

® ̄°°±223 ́μ ̄±2
	
 

 
	

		

 !"#$%%$&'()*++%'",-$.$(-/*.-012304566575849:;



< !",+".'#'.*-'$(%',-"=>"%$&!*,>""(?+=*-"=*(='(.$/+$/*-"='(-$-!',.$(-/*.-<.$+@$#-!',=$.?A"(-',

*B*'%*>%"$(-!"0?>,',-"(."C/$D"(0'-";!--+;EE&&&=%*A'%E /$$+0?++$/-E0?>,',-"(."EF+"/*-'$(*%5/*-'$(,E#/$D"(E



41GH5 5I49J /*'%K'LJH".$B"/@J1*.M*)"='(*C%"L'>%"1$?.!J0!"%#0-*>%"



<%%-"/A,*(=.$(='-'$(,$#-!",?>N".-.$(-/*.-/"A*'(-!",*A"
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-22-00449-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 17th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 017-325129-21

Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J., and Walker, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

RABI ADELEKE, Appellant

V.

GUNNS RESTORATION, INC., Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On November 14, 2022, and December 8, 2022, we notified appellant, in 

accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss 

this appeal unless appellant paid the $205 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 44.3. 

Appellant has not done so. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

Because appellant has not complied with a procedural requirement and the 

Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2015,1 we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: January 19, 2023

1

See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases 

in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, 

Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Aug. 28, 2015) (listing courts of appeals’ fees).
# C_2016214EN.01002201.xml

| 15.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 214/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 214/22

---

Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

(2016/C 214/05)

Pursuant to the second indent of Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

1

2

On page 94, the following text is inserted after the heading text of heading 2103‘Sauces and preparations therefor; mixed condiments and mixed seasonings; mustard flour and meal and prepared mustard’:

On page 94, the following text is inserted after the heading text of heading 2103‘Sauces and preparations therefor; mixed condiments and mixed seasonings; mustard flour and meal and prepared mustard’

‘This heading also includes products presented as sweet sauces of various tastes (e.g. caramel), if not included under a more specific heading (e.g. sauces containing cocoa of heading 1806, or flavoured or coloured sugar syrups of heading 2106). They can be used inter alia as dessert sauces or toppings (e.g. for ice creams or puddings).’

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 76, 4.3.2015, p. 1.

2

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0182

IN THE MATTER OF:

A.D.Y.,

Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 13, 2020, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 7 2020

10/07/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0182
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 149 (Tuesday, August 4, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 41560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20671]



[[Page 41560]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-687-000]


Mid Louisiana Gas Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

July 29, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 23, 1998, Mid Louisiana Gas Company (Mid 
Louisiana), 1100 Louisiana Street, Suite 2950, Houston, Texas 77002, 
filed in Docket No. CP98-687-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 
and 157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act 
(18 CFR 157.205, 157.212) for authorization to operate an existing tap 
located in West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana, as a delivery point, the 
accommodate natural gas transportation deliveries for Midcost 
Marketing, Inc. (Midcoast), an existing customer, under Mid Louisiana's 
blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-539-000 pursuant to 
Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the 
request that is on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    Mid Louisiana seeks authorization to operate an existing tap and 
install the necessary measurement and regulator facilities to 
accommodate the delivery of transportation volumes for gas lift 
operations under Mid Louisiana's currently effective interruptible 
transportation agreement with Midcost dated September 1, 1998. Mid 
Louisiana states that Midcoast has requested the installation of the 
proposed facilities in order to effectuate a sales transaction to 
riverside Pipeline.
    Mid Louisiana states that the estimated average daily deliveries 
from the proposed facilities will be approximately to 50 MMBtu, with a 
peak design capacity of 400 MMBtu. Mid Louisiana estimates the average 
annual quantity to be 15,000 MMBtu.
    Mid Louisiana states that the estimated cost to install the 
facilities will be $1,800, which will include the necessary metering 
and regulation equipment all of which will be reimbursed by Midcoast.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205) of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20671 Filed 8-3-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 148 (Monday, August 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 41234]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20570]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board Meeting

    The Science & Technology (S&T) Meeting Plan and Integrating Thrust 
Review in support of the HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board will meet at 
Woodshole, MA on September 14-16, 1998 from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    The purpose of the meeting is to gather information and receive 
briefings.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with Section 
552b of Title 5, United States Code, specifically subparagraphs (1) and 
(4) thereof.

    For further information, contact the HQ USAF Scientific Advisory 
Board Secretariat at (703) 697-8404.
Barbara A. Carmichael,
Alternate Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-20570 Filed 7-31-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910-01-P
≥95% (42 awardees)

75% - 94% (12 awardees)

50% - 74% (2 awardee)

25% - 49% (0 awardee)

<25% (0 awardees)

No IIS (0 awardees)

No data (0 awardees)

Percentage of children aged < 6 years participating in an immunization 

information system -- United States, five cities§, and D.C., 2022

National Participation: 98% (excluding Territories)

Source: CY2022 IISAR

§ Chicago, IL; Houston, TX; New York City, NY; Philadelphia, PA; San Antonio, TX.
EXHIBIT (10)(A)



 EXHIBIT (10)(a) 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of Additional
Information and to the use of our reports: (1) dated April 11, 2012, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company, and (2) dated April 13, 2012, with respect to the financial
statements of the subaccounts of Separate Account VA YNY, included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 10 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-147041) under the Securities Act of 1933 and related Prospectus of Flexible Premium Variable
Annuity - N. 
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
 Des Moines, Iowa 
 April 13, 2012
# C_2017033EN.01000301.xml

| 2.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 33/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 33/3

---

Special Report No 36/2016

‘An assessment of the arrangements for closure of the 2007-2013 cohesion and rural development programmes’

(2017/C 33/03)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 36/2016 ‘An assessment of the arrangements for closure of the 2007-2013 cohesion and rural development programmes’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu or on EU Bookshop: https://bookshop.europa.eu

---
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3876 STANDARD 15.27 0.03 -1.57

Tolerance

1 3876A VIOLET LIMIT 15.41 0.33 -1.87 0.14 0.30 -0.30 0.60

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

Shade Number BLUE 2312 Piece/Roll Number 3876

DLA/MARINE CORP SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT May 14, 2018

Fabric Nomenclature USMC CLOTH, GABARDINE, 

POLYESTER/WOOL, 10.6 OZ

MIL-C-10176K

(TYPE II Class 12)
No. 11-7538.

#### Larone Mills, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1134, 132 S. Ct. 1058,

181 L. Ed. 2d 776,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 93.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 435 Fed. Appx. 489.
No. 11-7999.

#### In re Cynthia Driver, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 1155, 132 S. Ct. 1135,

181 L. Ed. 2d 975,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 741.

January 17, 2012.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until February 7, 2012, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S (I) CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND
(II) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTAINED IN THE FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          85,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,530,000<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,847,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,277,000
<PP&E>                                     233,191,000<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             280,786,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       24,073,000
<BONDS>                                     99,399,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       13,837,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,062,000<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               280,786,000
<SALES>                                    113,198,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           113,198,000
<CGS>                                      103,659,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              103,659,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,455,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,858,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,028,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (459,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (569,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (18,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                    1,026,000
<NET-INCOME>                                   439,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F4>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F4>
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNT REPRESENTS NET ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE.
<F2>AMOUNT REPRESENTS NET PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT.
<F3>AMOUNT REPRESENTS ADDITIONAL PAID IN CAPITAL AND RETAINED EARNINGS.
<F4>ONLY REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC EQUITY OFFERINGS.
</FN>


</TABLE>
* John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment. NO. 07- 02-03 37-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRI CT OF TEX AS AT AMARILLO PANEL E JANUARY 24, 2003

____________

____________

______ ALAN ROYBALSEPEDA, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

____________

____________

_________ FRO M THE 242N D DIS TRIC T CO URT OF HA LE C OUN TY; NO. B137 12-00 04; HONOR ABLE ED SELF, JUDGE

____________

____________

_______ Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ. and BOYD, S.J
. * ABA TEMENT A ND REMAND Pursuant

to a gui lty plea, app ellant was convict ed of driv ing while in toxicate d and punishment

was assessed at five years confinement, suspended. After a hearing on the State’s motion to revoke, appell ant’s community supervisi on was rev oked and pu nishment was assessed atthe ori ginal fiv e-yea r sentenc e and a $1, 000 fine. Appellant perfected thi s app eal and t he clerk’s record was filed on September 10 , 2002. On November 1, 2002, David Fortenb erry filed

### 2

a request for an extension of time in which to file the reporter’ s record indicati ng that he was unable to co mplet e an approximate 50-page record due to his case load and was given until December

2, 2002. The recor

d has yet to befiled and no furth er reque st for an extension of ti me was filed. Thus, we n ow abate the appeal and remand t he cause to the trial court for further proceedings. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(a)(2). Upon remand, th e trial court sh all immediatel y causenotice o f a hearin g to be given and , thereaft er, condu ct a hear ing to de termine th e followi ng: 1. whether appellant desires to prosec ute thi s appeal, and if so, 2. why ap pellant has been dep rived of areporter’s re cord. The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. Should it be d etermined t hat appel lant does want tocontinuethis app ea l and is ind igent, then thetrial court sh all alsotake such measures as may be necessary to assur

e appella nt a rep orter’s record . The trial court shall execute findings of fact, conclusio ns of law, an d such ord ers as th e court may enter r egarding the aforementione d issues, a nd cause its find ings and co nclusions to be inc luded in a supplemental clerk’s record. A supplementa l recor d of the he aring sha ll also be included i n the appellate record. Finally, the trial court shall file the supplemental records with the Cler k of this Cour

t by Friday , Februa ry 21 , 2003. It is soordered
. Per Curiam Do not publ ish.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00378-CV

Pamela M. Rogers, Appellant

v. Horis Stedman, M.D., Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 277TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 20606, HONORABLE KEN ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

After filing a notice of appeal, appellant Pamela M. Rogers has failed to file a clerk’s

reco rd or a reporter’s record. Appellant failed to file the requisite filling fee. Her counsel filed a
motion to withdraw, a nd the Court allowed him to withdraw. On July 25, 2003, the Clerk of this
Court sent written notice to appellant that if she did not designate, pay for and file a clerk’s record,

or otherwise res pond to the Court, by August 5, the cause would be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant has failed to respond.

Consequently, this appeal is hereby dismissed for want o f prosecution pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b) and (c).

Jan P. Patterson, Justice Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Kidd and Patterson
Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: August 14, 2003
EXHIBIT 99.1


             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Exhaust  Technologies,  Inc.
on Form  10-QSB  for the  quarter  ended  October  31,  2002,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on December 14, 2002, I, Robert E. Sterling,
Chief Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.       the Periodic  Report fully complies with the  requirements  of
                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         2.       the  information  contained  in  the  Periodic  Report  fairly
                  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: December 14, 2002                                 /s/  Robert E. Sterling
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                                   and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register: November 30, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 229)]
[Notices]               
[Page 74127]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr30no10-147]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7250]

 
In the Matter of the Review of the Designation of Islamic 
Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU and Other Aliases) as a Foreign Terrorist 
Organization Pursuant to Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act, as Amended

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this 
matter pursuant to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (``INA''), and in 
consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the 
Treasury, I conclude that the circumstances that were the basis for the 
2004 re-designation of the aforementioned organization as a foreign 
terrorist organization have not changed in such a manner as to warrant 
revocation of the designation and that the national security of the 
United States does not warrant a revocation of the designation.
    Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the 
aforementioned organization as a foreign terrorist organization, 
pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be 
maintained.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: November 15, 2010.
James B. Steinberg,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-30123 Filed 11-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```