alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USTED HARÍA 

CUALQUIER 

COSA PARA 

PROTEGER A SU 

HIJO O HIJA DEL 

CÁNCER. ¿Pero 

ha hecho todo?

ENERO 2017

La vacuna contra el VPH previene el cáncer para niños y niñas. Sólo dos 

inyecciones a los 11–12 años de edad ofrecen una protección segura y duradera 

contra las infecciones que causan el cáncer de VPH. Pídale al medico o enfermera 

de su hijo o hija que le pongan la vacuna contra el VPH. 

 

www.cdc.gov/HPV 

is CANCER PREVENTION

vaccine
ITEM: Applesauce, No. 10 size can ************************

(APP) Secondary * MONOGRAPH: 2A9

************************

NSN: 8915-00-127-8272 ITEM SPECIFICATION:US Stds for Grades

 US Grade A

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Light yellow color, bright.

ODOR: Applesauce.

FLAVOR: Sweet; apple.

TEXTURE: Smooth with some pulp.

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36 months

 100 DEGREES F: 6 months

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

APPEARANCE: Dull, slightly brown color.

ODOR: Slightly sour.

FLAVOR: Slightly sour applesauce.

TEXTURE: Watery with fine pulp. 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None.
No. 10-10684.

#### Daniel Torres, Petitioner v. James Hartley, Warden.

565 U.S. 1075, 132 S. Ct. 802,

181 L. Ed. 2d 514,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8345.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 844, 132 S. Ct. 159, 181 L. Ed. 2d 73, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5884.
Major General Henry T. Glisson

USA 

Is inducted into the Defense Personnel Support Center Hall of Fame this third day of June 1997 for 

his extraordinary leadership and support as DPSC’s 24th Commander from 1993 to 1994. General 

Glisson spent his tour, and his career, improving service to his customers – the U.S. Armed Forces. 

He also made heroic efforts to assist displaced workers following closure of DPSC’s Clothing 

Factory, and DPSC’s anticipated relocation to Northeast Philadelphia. At the same time, he 

implemented DPSC’s reengineering efforts for creating partnerships between government and 

industry. His efforts were responsible for DPSC winning numerous awards for excellence in 

subsequent years. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/glisson.htm 1/21/2016
Exhibit 10.4

TERM NOTE



|            |  |                 
|----------- |  | ----------------
|$10,000,000 |  | January 31, 2007

On or before the Maturity Date, FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), promises to pay to the order of WB QT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (Lender) at Minneapolis, Minnesota, care of the Agent in lawful money of the United
States of America so much of the sum of Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000), as then be outstanding hereunder pursuant to the Credit Agreement dated as of January 31, 2007 made by and among the Company and certain lenders signatory thereto,
including the Lender, and WB QT, LLC as Agent for such lenders, as the same may be amended or otherwise modified from time to time (Credit Agreement), together with interest thereon as hereinafter set forth.

The Term Advance made hereunder shall bear interest at the interest rate from time to time applicable thereto under the Credit Agreement or as otherwise
determined thereunder, and interest shall be computed, assessed and payable as set forth in the Credit Agreement.

This Note is a Term Note
under Credit Agreement. This Note evidences borrowings under, is subject to, is secured in accordance with, and may be accelerated or prepaid under, the terms of the Credit Agreement to which reference is hereby made. Capitalized terms used herein,
except as defined to the contrary, shall have the meanings given them in the Credit Agreement.

This Note shall be interpreted and the
rights of the parties hereunder shall be determined under the laws of, and enforceable in, the State of Minnesota.

Company hereby waives
presentment for payment, demand, protest and notice of dishonor and nonpayment of this Note and agrees that no obligation hereunder shall be discharged by reason of any extension, indulgence, release, or forbearance granted by any holder of this
Note to any party now or hereafter liable hereon or any present or subsequent owner of any property, real or personal, which is now or hereafter security for this Note.

Nothing herein shall limit any right granted Lender by any other instrument or by law.

[Signature Follows
On Succeeding Page]



---

QUANTUM FUEL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES WORLDWIDE, INC.



|      |  |                        
|----- |  | -----------------------
|By:   |  | /s/ Kenneth R. Lombardo
|Name: |  | Kenneth R. Lombardo    
|Its:  |  | General Counsel        

[Signature page to Term Note]



2
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 21, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00424

- CR

Steven ROBLES

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR7479

Honorable Catherine Torres

- Stahl , Judge Presiding

ORDER

This appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on August 21, 2019

.

_____________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st da y of August, 2019

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4402]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,801; TA-W-64,801A]


Cequent Electrical Products, Inc., Formerly Known as Tekonsha 
Towing, Angolia, IN; Cequent Electrical Products, Inc., Formerly Known 
as Tekonsha Towing, McAllen, TX; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 
Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on January 15, 2009, applicable to workers of 
Cequent Electrical Products, Inc., Angolia, Indiana and Cequent 
Electrical Products, Inc., McAllen, Texas. The notice was published in 
the Federal Register on February 2, 2009 (74 FR 5870).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in activities related to warehousing and distribution supporting 
Cequent Electrical Products, Inc., Tekonsha, Michigan, a currently TAA-
certified worker group.
    Information also shows that some workers separated from employment 
at the subject firm had their wages reported under a separate 
unemployment insurance (UI) tax account for Tekonsha Towing.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to 
properly reflect this matter.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by increased 
imports of brake controls, breakaway kits and lights produced at the 
Tekonsha, Michigan location of the subject firm.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-64,801 and TA-W-64,801A are 
hereby issued as follows:

    All workers of Cequent Electrical Products, Inc., formerly known 
as Tekonsha Towing, Angola, Indiana (TA-W-64,801) and Cequent 
Electrical Products, Inc., formerly known as Tekonsha Towing, 
McAllen, Texas (TA-W-64,801A), who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after December 30, 2007 through 
January 15, 2011, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance 
under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 and are also eligible to 
apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 
of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 18th day of February 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-4402 Filed 3-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Montana Twelfth Judicial District Court. County of Hill.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- JOHN MICHAEL MERRILL, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-05-031

DECISION

On August 3, 2015, the Defendant’s sentence was revoked for violation of the conditions of a suspended sentence, and he was sentenced to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a period of five (5) years, for the offense of Count I: Criminal Endangerment, a Felony, in violation of §45-5-207, MCA. Defendant shall receive credit for 82 days previously served. Defendant shall receive no credit for elapsed time due to violations occurring in less than two weeks of his release into the community. Defendant shall pay all fines, costs, fees, and any other financial obligations ordered by the sentencing court in the original Judgment entered November 14, 2008.

On February 4, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant appeared by video conferencing from the Cascade County Jail and was represented by Jennifer Streano of the Office of the State Public *17Defender. The State was not represented.

Done in open Court this 4th day of February, 2016.

DATED this 29th day of February, 2016.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. John Warner, Member.
No. 09-8150.

#### Bobby Joe Davis, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

559 U.S. 976, 130 S. Ct. 1694,

176 L. Ed. 2d 188,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2153.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and in connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Pinnacle Airlines Corp. for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned Phillip H. Trenary, the President and Chief
Executive Officer, and Curtis E. Sawyer, the Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, hereby certify that the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
       Signature                        Title                          Date
       ---------                        -----                          ----
<S>                         <C>                                    <C>
/s/ Philip H. Trenary       President and Chief Executive          July 29, 2004
------------------------    Officer (Principal Executive
Philip H. Trenary           Officer)

/s/ Curtis E. Sawyer        Vice President and Chief               July 29, 2004
------------------------    Financial Officer (Principal
Curtis E. Sawyer            Financial Officer)
</TABLE>

                                       28
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40708

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DANNY RAY WHITE,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4-96-CR-4-ALL

- - - - - - - - - -

February 19, 1997

Before SMITH, DUHE’ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Danny Ray White appeals from his convictions and sentence

for attempting to manufacture and manufacturing methamphetamine,

attempting to manufacture and manufacturing amphetamine,

possession of a three-neck round-bottom flask, and possession of

ethyl ether, a listed chemical. He argues that the evidence was

insufficient to support his convictions, that the district court

erred by denying his motion to suppress, that the district court
No. 96-40708

- 2 -

abused its discretion by denying his motion for a mistrial, and

that the district court erred by imposing a fine. Based upon the

testimony presented at trial, the jury could have found beyond a

reasonable doubt that White committed the offenses with which he

was charged. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to

the Government and drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of

the verdict, the evidence is sufficient to support White’s

convictions. See United States v. Martinez, 975 F.2d 159, 160-61

(5th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 943 (1993). Further, the

affidavit upon which the search warrant was based was sufficient

to establish probable cause. See United States v. McKeever, 906

F.2d 129, 132 (5th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1070

(1991). Because White failed to show that a witness’s reference

to a rubber stopper seized from White’s vehicle was so

prejudicial that it had a substantial impact upon the jury’s

verdict, the district court did not abuse its discretion by

denying White’s motion for a mistrial. See United States v.

Ramirez, 963 F.2d 693, 699 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 944

(1992). Finally, because White failed to shoulder his burden of

showing that he was unable to pay, the district court did not err

by imposing a fine. See United States v. Altamirano, 11 F.3d 52,

53-54 (5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
Opinion issued September 29 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 16
- 00640
- CV

——————————— HEATHER ROYELLE DEHG AHN , Appella nt

V. MASOUD DEHGA H N , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 280th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2016
- 48803

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a judgment signed August 5, 2016. On September 1 , 2016, appellant, Heather Royelle Dehgahn , filed a motion for voluntary dismissal, asking to withdraw her notice of appeal and dismiss the appeal

. This motion indicates appellant no longer wishes to pursue her appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P.2

42.1(a)(1). No opinion has issued. More than 10 days have passed and no party has responded to the motion. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 1 0.1(a)(5), 10.3(a). Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Huddle.
No. 85-6787.

#### Russo *v.*Hartigan, Attorney General of Illinois.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON c-,

GILDARDO CRISOSTOMO VARGAS, ) c= cza --4 an incapacitated person, by and ) DIVISION ONE aa through WILLIAM DUSSAULT,his ) rncl, g -rt '12 •I Litigation Guardian ad Litem; LUCINA ) No. 76717-8-1 TE-or FLORES,an individual; and LUCINA ) —3 CP ••c FLORES as Guardian ad Litem for ) PATRICIA CRISOSTOMO FLORES, ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION And ROSARIO CRISOSTOMO ) FLORES,minor children, ) ) Petitioners, )

) v. ) ) INLAND WASHINGTON,LLC,a ) Washington limited liability company, ) ) Respondent, )

) INLAND GROUP P.S., LLC,a ) Washington limited liability company; ) RALPH'S CONCRETE PUMPING, ) INC., a Washington corporation; and ) MILES SAND & GRAVEL COMPANY ) d/b/a CONCRETE NOR'WEST,a ) Washington corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) FILED: September 17,2018

) DWYER,J.— In light of the Supreme Court's decision in Afoa v. Port of Seattle, 191 Wn.2d 110,421 P.3d 903 (2018),which reversed this court's decision in Afoa v. Port of Seattle, 198 Wn.App. 206, 393 P.3d 802 (2017), the standards for discretionary

### No. 76717-8-1/2

review set forth in RAP 2.3(b)(4)are not met. Accordingly, we deem review improvidently granted. This matter is remanded to the superior court for further proceedings, as if review
had never been granted by this court in the first instance. Dismissed.

2
No. 11-6429.

#### Edward T. Collier, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 989, 132 S. Ct. 525,

181 L. Ed. 2d 369,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7860.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

OMAR GALLARDO TORRES, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 19-30021

D.C. No. 18-17-SEH-01

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Sam E. Haddon, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 12, 2019

Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges, and PRATT,** District 

Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Omar Gallardo Torres, a citizen of Mexico, appeals the 

district court’s imposition of a five-year term of supervised release that the court 

labeled “inactive” while Gallardo Torres is outside the United States under a 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as 

provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern 

District of Iowa, sitting by designation.

FILED

JAN 23 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
lawful deportation order. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We 

review for an abuse of discretion, United States v. Collins, 684 F.3d 873, 888 (9th 

Cir. 2012), and affirm. 

A term of supervised release cannot be tolled, stayed, or suspended while a 

person is outside the United States pursuant to a lawful deportation order.1 See

United States v. Ignacio Juarez, 601 F.3d 885, 890 (9th Cir. 2010) (per curiam); 

United States v. Murguia-Oliveros, 421 F.3d 951, 952, 954 (9th Cir. 2005). 

However, the district court here did not impose a tolled, stayed, or suspended term 

of supervision. Rather, the court acknowledged that while Gallardo Torres was not 

residing in the country, he could not be directly and actively supervised by the 

Probation Office and would therefore be under inactive supervision. If Gallardo 

Torres thereafter returned to the United States, he would then be subject to active 

supervision. 

AFFIRMED. 

1 Gallardo Torres’s claim is ripe for review on direct appeal because his 

supervised release term forms “a part of the district court’s sentence, which is a 

final judgment subject to immediate appeal.” United States v. RodriguezRodriguez, 441 F.3d 767, 771–72 (9th Cir. 2006) (citing 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)).
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Jreymarcius Jreymaine Reason, Appellant

No. 06

- 18

- 00175

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 188th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 47192

- A ). Opinion deli vered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the tri al court

. We note that the appellant, Jreymarcius Jreymaine Reason, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MAY 31, 2019 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
exh10_27.htm


 










Exhibit 10.27


 



PROMISSORY NOTE (No. 007)


(December 28, 2009)


 


WHEREAS, GlynnTech, Inc. of 24 Mine Street, Flemington, New Jersey has sold patent rights and technology relating to cancer drug delivery systems to SpeechSwitch, Inc. of 6 Minneakoning Rd., Flemington, New Jersey 08822, under an Agreement of June 18, 2009, and a portion of the purchase price in the amount of $ 125,000.00 was contingent upon a pending patent application successfully issuing into a United States issued patent; and,


 


WHEREAS, said pending patent application did issue on December 28, 2009 into United States Patent Number US 7,637,889 B2 entitled “ Drug Delivery Device With Sliding Valve And Methodology” , causing the incurrence of the remaining obligation of $ 125,000.00 to become due one year from the issue date of said patent, to be secured by Note(s) in that amount upon issuance of said patent with a one year due date, by mutual agreement to be in the form of two notes for $ 50,000.00 each (designated as Notes 006 and 007), and one note for $ 25,000.00 (designated as Note 008), this being Note 007 for $ 50,000.00, and SpeechSwitch, Inc. has agreed to make payment on said Notes one year henceforth, now, therefore,


 


SpeechSwitch, Inc. agrees to pay GlynnTech, Inc. a sum of $ 50,000.00 on or before December 29, 2010, at no interest. This Note shall be in default if not paid in full within 5 days from the due date. No interest shall accrue during the term hereof. However, GlynnTech, Inc, reserves the right to statutory interest after default, at its option.



  




 



	 	 /s/ Kenneth P Glynn                                                  
	 	 Kenneth P. Glynn, President, SpeechSwitch, Inc.
	 	 
	 	 /s/ Alex P Glynn                                                         
	 	 Alex P. Glynn, Vice President, GlynnTech, Inc.