alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 149 (Tuesday, August 4, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41589-41590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20803]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Availability of Amendment to the Environmental Assessment for the 
Southside Barrier Replacement Project

AGENCY: National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior.

SUMMARY: The National Park Service, at the request of the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, has prepared an Amendment to the 
Environmental Assessment for the Southside Barrier Replacement Project. 
The Amendment includes the construction of four (4) gatehouses and the 
realignment of the small curved roadway connecting E Street with west 
South Executive Avenue. The document is available for review and public 
comment through September 15, 1998.
    Copies may be requested by calling the National Park Service, White 
House Liaison, at (202) 619-6344 weekdays from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. 
Written requests may be sent to 1100 Ohio

[[Page 41590]]

Drive, SW., Room 344, Washington, DC 20242.

    Dated: July 28, 1998.
James I. McDaniel,
Director, White House Liaison.
[FR Doc. 98-20803 Filed 8-3-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
MIL-C-40004C

A-A-59495 

(NUGGET)

ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 17052 STANDARD 99.48 2.28 -12.99

Tolerance

1 1 RED-VIOLET 

LIMIT 99.32 2.70 -13.24 -0.15 0.42 -0.25 0.53

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

DLA/NAVY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT August 22, 2017

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, KNITTED, COTTON, SIMPLEX

Shade Number WHITE 3028 Piece/Roll Number 17052

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF
No. 11-122.

#### Innovair Aviation Limited, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1147, 132 S. Ct. 999,

181 L. Ed. 2d 790,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 567.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

The Chief Justice and Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 632 F.3d 1336.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4691 Introduced in House (IH)]
```
************************

• MONOGRAPH NO.: 5A2

************************

ITEM: Oatmeal, Instant,

 Maple/Brown Sugar (OMS)

NSN: 8920-01-265-0043 ITEM SPECIFICATION: MIL-O-44278

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 490/125 Grams

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

 APPEARANCE: Light, tan, thick cereal.

 ODOR: Slightly sweet oatmeal, maple and brown sugar.

 FLAVOR: Slightly brown sugar, cooked oatmeal.

 TEXTURE: Thick, moist, slightly creamy.

 ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT 70 DEGREES F: 36 months.

 80 DEGREES F: 24 months

 90 DEGREES F: 12 months

 100 DEGREES F: 6 months

EXPECTED DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

 APPEARANCE: Darker brown, thicker when rehydrated.

 ODOR: Caramelized, slightly burnt sugar, molasses.

 FLAVOR: Molasses, burnt sugar, loss of sweetness.

 TEXTURE: Very thick, tacky.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: Initial examination should be

in the dehydrated state. Final examination and evaluation should

be performed after reconstitution in a minimum of eight ounces of hot water.

Product should be completely rehydrated.

SPECIAL NOTES: Product is packed in a flexible package. Package

is designed to yield approximately 3/4 cup of product (340 grams)

when rehydrated. A one to two year shelf life is anticipated at 100 degree F

storage.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sturgis Bancorp, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Brian P. Hoggatt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|                       |  |                                                              
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Date November 13, 2002 |  | /s/ Brian P. HoggattBrian P. Hoggatt, Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-794.

#### Arnold Dewalt Beverly, Petitioner v. Federal Election Commission.

559 U.S. 973, 130 S. Ct. 1732,

176 L. Ed. 2d 183,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2064.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-50941

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM PERRY LORD,

a/k/a Bill Lord,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-93-CR-99

- - - - - - - - - -

August 30, 1996

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

William Perry Lord appeals his sentence and conviction for

multiple counts relating to failure to keep and maintain records,

falsifying records, and conspiring to fail to maintain records in

connection with the sale of firearms. Having examined the

record, we determine that the trial court did not err in giving

an instruction regarding “deliberate ignorance.” The district

court correctly determined that the circumstances surrounding the
No. 95-50941

- 2 -

sale of the firearms were so overwhelmingly suspicious that

Lord’s failure to question the purchase allows the instruction to

be given. United States v. Lara-Velasquez, 919 F.2d, 946, 953

(5th Cir. 1990).

Lord also objects to the sentencing court’s adjustment of

his sentence by two levels for obstructing justice. The court

made specific findings that Lord committed perjury by adopting

the findings of the Presentence Report. 

Once a sentencing court finds that a defendant has committed

perjury at trial, an upward adjustment is required under U.S.S.G.

§ 3C1.1. United States v. Storm, 36 F.2d 1289, 1295 (5th Cir.

1994), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1798 (1995). Ample evidence in

the record supports the sentencing court’s finding that Lord

committed perjury when he testified that he did not know that

firearms he sold to a woman using the identification of Sandra

Degadillo were actually being purchased by Jorge Valdez. 

Therefore, any error with regard to a finding concerning Mendez’

true identity was harmless. See Williams v United States, 503

U.S. 193, 202 (1992).

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,164]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 9, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Bradington-Young, LLC, Cherryville, North Carolina.

The workers at the subject facility are covered by an earlier petition (TA-W-65,147) filed on February 5, 2009 that is the subject of an ongoing investigation for which a determination has not been issued. Further investigation in this case would duplicate efforts and serve no purpose; therefore the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of February 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E9-4407 Filed 3-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4821 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4821

  To amend section 10501 of title 49, United States Code, to exclude 
       solid waste disposal from the jurisdiction of the Surface 
                         Transportation Board.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 2006

 Mr. Pallone (for himself, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. Saxton, Mr. Andrews, Mr. 
   Payne, and Mr. Hinchey) introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend section 10501 of title 49, United States Code, to exclude 
       solid waste disposal from the jurisdiction of the Surface 
                         Transportation Board.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Solid Waste Environmental Regulation 
Clarification Affecting Railroads Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO EXCLUDE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FROM THE 
              JURISDICTION OF THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD.

    Section 10501 of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(2), by inserting ``except for solid 
        waste management facilities (as defined in section 1004 of the 
        Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6903)),'' after 
        ``facilities,''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)(2)--
                    (A) by striking ``over mass'' and inserting the 
                following: ``over--
                    ``(A) mass''; and
                    (B) by striking the period at the end and inserting 
                the following: ``; or
                    ``(B) the processing or sorting of solid waste.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




The
      undersigned, Yu Chang, the Chief Executive Officer of CHINA AGRITECH, INC.
      (the
“Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:




1.  
      The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008
      (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  
      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 14th
      day of May, 2008.




/s/
                Yu ChangYu
                ChangChief
                Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Agritech, Inc. and will be retained by China Agritech, Inc. and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




The
      forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      and
      is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
      made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
      language in such filing.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (adopted pursuantto §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned President andChief Executive Officer of Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterlyperiod ended January 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of theCompany.

 

Date: March 17, 2006

 
|   | /s/ Timothy J. Dodd                      |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                     |
|   | Timothy J. Dodd                          |
|   | *President and Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6333

MICHAEL F. DEHONEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHARLIE J. CEPAK, Warden, individually and/or

in his official capacity,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 97-6541

MICHAEL F. DEHONEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHARLIE J. CEPAK, Warden, individually and/or

in his official capacity,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-96-1358-21BE)

Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 30, 1997
2

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael F. Dehoney, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Crouch Coleman,

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying his

motion to amend his complaint after Appellee moved for summary

judgment (No. 97-6333), and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint (No. 97-6541). We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinions accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. Dehoney v. Cepak, No. CA-96-

1358-21BE (D.S.C. Feb. 12, 1997, and Mar. 14, 1997). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Joseph Saunders, Will Saunders, George Saunders, Charles A. Saunders, Edward Chandler Saunders, Florence Saunders Roberts, by her Husband and Next Friend, Jerry Roberts, Isabelle S. Bryan, by her Husband and Next Friend, Frank Bryan, Lionel Hinson, Eliza Foster, by her Husband and Next Friend, Frank Foster, *Appellants,*v. E. L. Eaton, and the Bank of Waldo, a Corporation, *Appellees.*

Division A.

Decision Filed January 23, 1926.

*Frank Clark, Jr.,*for Appellants;

*A. B. é C. C■ Small,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record, of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Brown, C. J., and Ellis and Strum, J. J., concur.
No. 11-6289.

#### Allan Mugan, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1175, 132 S. Ct. 1139,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1012,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 669.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 958, 132 S. Ct. 439, 181 L. Ed. 2d 285, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7205.
#### J. C. Devine, *Appellant,*v. Bernice Watrous, a *feme-sole,*Gilbert M. L. Johnson and Winifred M. Johnson, his Wife, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision Filed May 24, 1926.

*Burdine & Barco,*for Appellant;

*Semple & Taylor*and *G. A. Worley*c@ *Son,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and- argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
# C_2016306EN.01000601.xml

| 23.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 306/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 306/6

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(2016/C 306/06)

| Member State | United Kingdom |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Orkney Mainland (Kirkwall) and the islands of Papa Westray, North Ronaldsay, Westray, Sanday, Stronsay and Eday |
| Period of validity of the contract | 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2021 |
| Deadline for submission of applications and tenders | 9 November 2016 |
| Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | Orkney Islands Council |
| Council Offices |
| School Place |
| Kirkwall |
| KW15 1NY |
| UNITED KINGDOM |
| For the attention of: Ms Rosemary Colsell |
| Procurement Manager |
| Email: procurement@orkney.gov.uk |
| Tel. +44 1856873535 |

Member State

United Kingdom

Route concerned

Orkney Mainland (Kirkwall) and the islands of Papa Westray, North Ronaldsay, Westray, Sanday, Stronsay and Eday

Period of validity of the contract

1 April 2017 to 31 March 2021

Deadline for submission of applications and tenders

9 November 2016

Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

Orkney Islands Council

Council Offices

School Place

Kirkwall

KW15 1NY

UNITED KINGDOM

For the attention of: Ms Rosemary Colsell

Procurement Manager

Email: procurement@orkney.gov.uk

Tel. +44 1856873535

---
Montana First Judicial District Court. County of Lewis and Clark.

#### *24STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- MICHELLE COLLER GABLE Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-11-289

Done in open Court this 8th day of April, 2016.

DATED this 3rd day of May, 2016.

APPLICATION DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

On March 1, 2013, for the felony offense of Count I: Deliberate Homicide (of Sunday Cooley Bennett), the Defendant was sentenced to the Montana Women’s Prison for one hundred (100) years. For the felony offense of Count II: Deliberate Homicide (of Joseph Andrew Gable), the Defendant was sentenced to the Montana Women’s Prison for one hundred (100) years. The sentence imposed for Count II was ordered to run consecutively to the sentence imposed for Count I.

On April 8, 2016, Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was scheduled to be heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”) at the Montana Women’s Prison in Billings, Montana.

Defendant was present and was represented by Peter Ohman of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, Defense Counsel informed the Division that the Defendant was planning to file for post-conviction relief. The Division advised the Defendant and her Counsel that it does not have the authority to review a sentence until it is final—after all appeals and post-conviction relief have been completed. Defendant was further advised that she may re-apply for sentence review sixty (60) days after her post-conviction relief was completed, including if her petition for PCR is denied. Peter Ohman stated that he would not be the attorney filing for post-conviction relief and that the Defendant was proceeding pro-se.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that Defendant’s Application in this matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendant may re-file her Application with the Lewis and Clark County Clerk of District Court within 60 days of the date of completion of all Montana State post-conviction proceedings, in accordance with Rule 2, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. Russell Fagg, Alternate Member.
Exhibit
        32
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **(18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of BDC Capital, Inc. (the *“Company”* ),
        on
        Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission (the *“Report”* ),
        I,
        Richard A. Pomije, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
        the
        Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
        (18
        U.S.C. Section 135)), that to my knowledge:
  (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 
 Date: 01-13-2006
 
 /s/ Richard A.
        Pomije
 Richard
        A. Pomije
 Chief
        Executive Officer and
 Chief
        Financial Officer