alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on January 5, 2009, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Alliance for Flexible Polyurethane Foam, Inc. (“AFPF”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Alliance for Flexible Polyurethane Foam, Inc. (“AFPF”), Loudon, TN. The nature and scope of AFPF's standards development activities are: To develop standards related to flexible polyurethane foam, and to certify flexible polyurethane foam meeting those standards.

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. E9-4020 Filed 2-25-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION



### November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 3

- 0 1054

- CR

Style: Jimmy R. Williams

v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed * : March 25 , 2014

Type of motion: Extension of time to file Anders response

Party filing motion: Pro se

Document to be filed: Anders response

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: March 28 , 2014

Number of previous extensions granted: 0 Current Due date: March 28, 2014

Date Requested: N/A

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If docume nt is to be f

iled, document due:

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, t he Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot )

 Other: _____________________________________

Appellant previously filed a motion for extension of time to file his Anders response on March 21, 2014.

The Court granted appellant’s motion and ordered appellant’s Anders response to be filed by April 28,

2014. Appellant has filed a second motion for extension requesting the same relief. Appellant’s motion for

extension filed March 25, 2014 is dismissed as moot. Appellant’s Anders response is due April 28, 2014.

Judge's signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley



Panel consists of

____________________________________________

Date: April 1, 2014
# C_2016125EN.01000201.xml

| 8.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 125/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 125/2

---

Communication on the publication of the amounts of raw milk production as referred to in Article 149(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1)

1

(2016/C 125/02)

| (Annual data (1000 t)) |
| --- |
| Amounts of raw milk production (**) as referred to in Article 149(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 |
| | Cow | Ewe | Goat | Buffalo |
| BE | 3 710,0 | 0,0 | 0,0 | 0,0 |
| BG | 1 103,0 | 75,0 | 44,0 | 9,0 |
| CZ | 2 933,5 | 0,0 | 0,2 | 0,0 |
| DK | 5 162,0 | 0,0 | 0,0 | 0,0 |
| DE | 32 381,1 | 2,1  (***) | 13,9 | 4,6  (***) |
| EE | 804,8 | 0,0 | 0,4 | 0,0 |
| IE | 5 821,3 | 0,0 | 0,0 | 0,0 |
| EL | 769,0 | 772,0 | 351,0 | 0,0 |
| ES | 6 779,8 | 596,5 | 477,5 | 0,5 |
| FR | 25 779,6 | 266,3 | 603,8 | 0,0 |
| HR | 712,0 | 6,0 | 10,0 | 0,0 |
| IT | 11 500,0 | 441,2 | 55,5 | 220,7 |
| CY | 164,6 | 19,2 | 29,1 | 0,0 |
| LV | 968,9 | 0,0 | 2,9 | 0,0 |
| LT | 1 791,1 | 0,0 | 3,9 | 0,0 |
| LU | 317,1 | 0,0 | 2,7 | 0,0 |
| HU | 1 875,7 | 1,7 | 3,5 | 0,0 |
| MT | 42,8 | 1,6 | 0,9 | 0,0 |
| NL | 12 660,4 | 3,0  (***) | 244,2 | 1,5  (***) |
| AT | 3 493,9 | 11,2 | 19,8 | 0,0 |
| PL | 12 986,0 | 0,0 | 16,0 | 0,0 |
| PT | 2 000,3 | 71,2 | 29,6 | 0,0 |
| RO | 4 101,0 | 429,0 | 245,0 | 29,0 |
| SI | 616,6 | 0,5 | 1,4 | 0,0 |
| SK | 930,7 | 11,6 | 0,2 | 0,0 |
| FI | 2 400,0 | 0,0 | 0,0 | 0,0 |
| SE | 2 931,7 | 0,0 | 0,0 | 0,0 |
| UK | 15 088,0 | 0,0 | 0,0 | 0,0 |
| EU-28 | 159 824,9 | 2 708,1 | 2 155,5 | 265,3 |

(Annual data (1000 t))

Amounts of raw milk production (**) as referred to in Article 149(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013

**

Cow

Ewe

Goat

Buffalo

BE

3 710,0

0,0

0,0

0,0

BG

1 103,0

75,0

44,0

9,0

CZ

2 933,5

0,0

0,2

0,0

DK

5 162,0

0,0

0,0

0,0

DE

32 381,1

2,1  (***)

***

13,9

4,6  (***)

***

EE

804,8

0,0

0,4

0,0

IE

5 821,3

0,0

0,0

0,0

EL

769,0

772,0

351,0

0,0

ES

6 779,8

596,5

477,5

0,5

FR

25 779,6

266,3

603,8

0,0

HR

712,0

6,0

10,0

0,0

IT

11 500,0

441,2

55,5

220,7

CY

164,6

19,2

29,1

0,0

LV

968,9

0,0

2,9

0,0

LT

1 791,1

0,0

3,9

0,0

LU

317,1

0,0

2,7

0,0

HU

1 875,7

1,7

3,5

0,0

MT

42,8

1,6

0,9

0,0

NL

12 660,4

3,0  (***)

***

244,2

1,5  (***)

***

AT

3 493,9

11,2

19,8

0,0

PL

12 986,0

0,0

16,0

0,0

PT

2 000,3

71,2

29,6

0,0

RO

4 101,0

429,0

245,0

29,0

SI

616,6

0,5

1,4

0,0

SK

930,7

11,6

0,2

0,0

FI

2 400,0

0,0

0,0

0,0

SE

2 931,7

0,0

0,0

0,0

UK

15 088,0

0,0

0,0

0,0

EU-28

159 824,9

2 708,1

2 155,5

265,3

---

(1)  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(*)  0,0: zero or less than half the unit.

*

(**)  2014 Milk Production on the farm Eurostat — NewCronos Products Obtained.

**

(***)  Communicated by the Member State and/or estimated/calculated production.

***

---
Powers of Attorney, Steven D. Lash


 Exhibit (10)(i) 

NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY CORPORATION 
 POWERS OF ATTORNEY FOR A LIMITED PURPOSE 
 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of
the undersigned constitutes and appoints each of Matthew M. Grove, Thomas F. English, Paul W. Horrocks, Linda M. Reimer and George E. Silos, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, each with full power of substitution and resubstitution
for him in his name, place and stead, to sign any and all registration statements or other filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission or any state regulatory agency or authority applicable to New York Life Insurance and Annuity
Corporation Variable Annuity Separate Account – II (File Number 033-53344) and any amendments or supplements thereto, and withdrawals thereof, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission or any state regulatory agency or authority granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he might or could do in person in his capacity as a Director or officer of New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corporation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. 
 These Powers of Attorney may be signed in one or more counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same document. 
  

			
		
	  
 Christopher T. Ashe
	  	 /s/ Steven D. Lash
 Steven D. Lash

		
	  
 Christopher O.
Blunt
	  	  
 Theodore A. Mathas

		
	  
 Frank M. Boccio
	  	  
 Mark W. Pfaff

		
	  
 Stephen P. Fisher
	  	  
 Arthur H. Seter

		
	  
 John T. Fleurant
	  	  
 Michael E. Sproule

		
	  
 Robert M. Gardner
	  	  
 Joel M. Steinberg

		
	  
 Solomon Goldfinger
	  	  
 Susan A. Thrope


 Dated: April 3, 2012
Montana Fourth Judicial District Court. County of Missoula.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- DANIEL TODD COLLINS, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-13-102

DECISION

On September 16, 2015, the Defendant’s suspended sentence was revoked and was sentenced to the Department of Corrections for a term of five (5) years, with no time suspended, for the offense of Count II: Failure to Register as a Sexual or Violent Offender, a felony, in violation of §46-23-504, MCA. The terms and conditions of the suspended portion of this Judgment are the same as those contained in the judgment filed with the Court on March 9, 2015. The Court respectfully requested that Defendant be screened for all available *36mental health and chemical dependency programs. The Defendant was granted credit for a total of five hundred fifty (550) days for time served. The Defendant was designated a Level 1 Sex Offender.

Done in open Court this 6th day of May, 2016.

DATED this 10th day of June, 2016.

On May 6, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Jennifer Streano of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member.
No. D-2604.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of James George Charles.

565 U.S. 1052, 132 S. Ct. 809,

181 L. Ed. 2d 520,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8462.

November 28, 2011.

James George Charles, of Rockville, Maryland, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
**Exhibit
      3.3**








**Text
      of Amendment to Bylaws of Cyber Merchants Exchange, Inc.**








ARTICLE
      II.





DIRECTORS








2.02   Number
      of Directors .
      The
      number of directors of this corporation shall be seven (7), unless and until
      otherwise determined by vote of a majority of the entire Board of Directors.
      The
      number of Directors shall not be less than three, unless all of the outstanding
      shares are owned beneficially and of record by less than three shareholders,
      in
      which event the number of Directors shall not be less than the number of
      shareholders permitted by statute.
≥95% (35 awardees)

75% - 94% (19 awardees)

50% - 74% (0 awardee)

25% - 49% (0 awardees)

<25% (0 awardees)

No IIS (1 awardee)

No data (1 awardee)

Percentage of children aged < 6 years participating in an immunization 

information system -- United States, five cities§, and D.C., 2018

National Participation: 95% (excluding Territories)

Source: CY2018 IISAR

§ Chicago, IL; Houston, TX; New York City, NY; Philadelphia, PA; San Antonio, TX.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ANDREUS SANTOLOCI
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 2796

[ June 23, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Scott Kerner , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2021

- MH

- 002795

- XXXX

- SB

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine Austin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jacqueline I. Kurland, Senior A ssistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale , for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH
, C.J., C IKLIN and C ONNER
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 11-444.

#### Frank Blankenship, Petitioner v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.

565 U.S. 1093, 132 S. Ct. 849,

181 L. Ed. 2d 549,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8929.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

*550Same case below, 644 F.3d 1350.
No. 09-8339.

#### Donnell Mann, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 954, 130 S. Ct. 1544,

176 L. Ed. 2d 137,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1407.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 341 Fed. Appx. 877.
Date: 1 September 2022 ***************************

NSN: 8940-01-613-1418 (BSD) *MONOGRAPH: MCW/LRP 17

 ***************************

Item: Breakfast Skillet, Cooked, Dehydrated

Document:

PCR-B-053, Breakfast Skillet (Shredded Potatoes and Scrambled Eggs Mixed with 

Meat or Poultry Sausage, Bell Peppers and Onions), Cooked, Dehydrated, 

Packaged in a Boil-In-Bag (BIB) or Stand Up Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 450 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Dehydrated product: A mixture of off-white to light cream interior and exterior color 

shredded potatoes, yellow colored scrambled egg pieces, green colored bell pepper

pieces and red to reddish-orange colored red bell pieces, off-white colored onion

pieces. Flavor 1 Brown colored pork sausage pieces; Flavor 2 Off-white to light tan 

colored turkey sausage pieces.

Rehydrated product: Off-white to light cream interior and exterior color shredded 

potatoes, yellow colored scrambled egg pieces, green colored bell pepper pieces and 

red to reddish-orange colored red bell pieces, translucent white to off-white color 

onion pieces. Flavor 1 Light to medium brown color 1/4 to 3/4 inch in length pork 

sausage pieces. Flavor 2 Light tan color 1/8 to 1/4 inch in length turkey sausage pieces.

Odor:

Dehydrated product: Flavor 1 Smoked egg and pork sausage. Flavor 2 Smoked egg 

and turkey sausage.

Rehydrated product: Flavor 1 Smoked egg, shredded potatoes, bell peppers and onions 

and cooked pork sausage. Flavor 2 Smoked egg, shredded potatoes, bell peppers and 

onions and cooked turkey sausage.

Flavor:

Rehydrated product: Flavor 1 Smoked egg, shredded potatoes, bell peppers and onions

and cooked pork sausage. Flavor 2 Smoked egg, shredded potatoes, bell peppers and 

onions and cooked turkey sausage.

Texture:

Dehydrated product: No wet or soft spots indicating incomplete dehydration.

Rehydrated product: Fully rehydrated within twelve minutes, moist and tender 

shredded potatoes, moist and tender and may be slightly spongy scrambled egg pieces,

soft and tender bell pepper and onion pieces. Flavor 1 Moist and tender pork sausage 

pieces. Flavor 2 Moist and tender turkey sausage pieces.

Possible Deteriorative Changes

Appearance:

Dehydrated and Rehydrated: Darkening or loss of color of egg, shredded potato, 

sausage, and vegetables. Flavor I Darkening or loss of color of pork sausage pieces. 

Flavor II Darkening or loss of color of turkey sausage pieces.

Odor: Dehydrated and Rehydrated: Sulfur, loss of smoked egg, rancid, cardboard.

Flavor: Dehydrated and Rehydrated: Sulfur, bland, bitter, grassy, rancid, oxidized. 

Texture:

Dehydrated: Very hard, tacky components.

Rehydrated: Unrehydrated product, hardening of egg and sausage, potatoes, and 

vegetables, excessive syneresis.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

N/A
Date: 1 September 2022 ***************************

NSN: 8940-01-613-1418 (BSD) *MONOGRAPH: MCW/LRP 17

 ***************************

Special Notes N/A
# C_2016401EN.01000301.xml

| 29.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 401/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 401/3

---

Special Report No 26/2016

‘Making cross-compliance more effective and achieving simplification remains challenging’

(2016/C 401/03)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 26/2016 ‘Making cross-compliance more effective and achieving simplification remains challenging’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu or on EU Bookshop: https://bookshop.europa.eu

---
USTED HARÍA CUALQUIER COSA 

PARA PROTEGER A SU HIJO O HIJA DEL 

CÁNCER. ¿Pero ha hecho todo?

La vacuna contra el VPH previene el cáncer para niños y niñas. Sólo dos 

inyecciones a los 11–12 años de edad ofrecen una protección segura y duradera 

contra las infecciones que causan el cáncer de VPH. Pídale al medico o enfermera 

de su hijo o hija que le pongan la vacuna contra el VPH. 

 

ENERO 2017

www.cdc.gov/HPV 

is CANCER PREVENTION

vaccine
ENG-12.31.11 Exh 10.44






EXHIBIT 10.44


SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE ENGLOBAL 401(k) PLAN
WHEREAS, ENGlobal Engineering, Inc. (hereinafter, the "Employer") maintains the ENGlobal 401(k) Plan;
WHEREAS, the Employer has the right to amend the Plan pursuant to Section 11.1 of the Basic Plan Document; and
WHEREAS, the Employer now desires to amend the Plan, in connection with the merger of the Control Dynamics International, LP 401(k) Plan and the ENGlobal 401(k) Plan, to preserve protected benefits.
NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of August 2, 2010, the Employer hereby amends the ENGlobal 401(k) Plan in the following respects:
1.    The following Item 3 is added to the Protected Benefits Addendum to the Adoption Agreement:
3.    Employer contribution accounts transferred from the Control Dynamics International, LP 401(k) Plan shall be subject to a 2-year cliff vesting schedule. However, the employer contribution accounts of Participants who terminated employment prior to the merger of the Control Dynamics International, LP 401(k) Plan and the ENGlobal 401(k) Plan are subject to the following vesting schedule: 1 year of service-0%, 2 years-20%, 3 years-40%, 4 years-60%, 5 years-80%, 6 years-100%.
Also, a Participant may take an in-service withdrawal from any employer contribution account transferred from the Control Dynamics International, LP 401(k) Plan upon the attainment of age 40 and the completion of 5 years of participation.
2.    In all other respects, the terms of this Plan are hereby ratified and confirmed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has caused this Second Amendment to be executed in duplicate counterparts, each of which shall be considered as an original, as of the date set forth below.




	
		
	 
	ENGLOBAL ENGINEERING, INC.

	             /s/ Jean Whitaker
	By:      /s/ Natalie S. Hairston                                          

	Witness
	 

	 
	Title:         Secretary                                        

	 
	

Date:         August 4, 2010                                             









1
TOTM FAQS (Frequently Asked Questions)

Q: Is the TOTM a MRE? Can it be used in lieu of a MRE?

A: The TOTM is not a MRE. While the TOTM does employ MRE components, there are several 

important distinctions between the two. The TOTM does not meet all of the military specifications of the 

MRE (such as extended shelf-life). The TOTM is not to be used in lieu of a MRE unless ARNG policy 

states that the usage of the MRE is optional and not mandatory (example: during IDT). The TOTM is 

intended for usage during IDT and travel days to and from AT (Annual Training) as an alternative to 

commercial meal products. Usage of the MRE is mandatory during AT for the ARNG.

Q: What is the best source for TOTM information?

A: The best source for TOTM information is our website. The direct link to the TOTM webpage is 

http://www.dscp.dla.mil/subs/rations/meals/totm.htm. The webpage information is the most “up-to-date” 

source and supercedes all hardcopy print information.

Q: Do the prices on the website reflect the final cost of the product to the ARNG?

A: Yes. The prices on the website include the surcharge and are the final cost to the ordering activity.

Q: Can individual ARNG units order the TOTM from DSCP directly?

A: No. All individual units must filter their requests through their state level United States Property and 

Fiscal Officer (USPFO) Activity. This is similar to how the MRE is ordered by the ARNG.

Q: Can individual ARNG units or the USPFO order TOTM directly from the manufacturer?

A: No. The TOTM is a government product (not to be confused with commercial products of a similar 

nature) and ARNG orders for it must be placed to DSCP by the State USPFO Activity.

Q: Can the ordering Activity choose which vendor and corresponding set of menus they desire?

A: Yes. Each of the three vendors has their own LSN ordering number and set of menus. It is the option of 

the customer to choose which set of menus that they want.

Q: What information is required from the ordering State USPFO when ordering the TOTM?

A: The required information is as follows: LSN, quantity, requisition number (to include USPFO 

DODAAC), signal code, fund code, and required delivery date.

Q: If the TOTM exceeds its shelf life, can it be inspected to determine if it is still acceptable for 

consumption (similar to Army Veterinary Inspections done with the MRE)?

A: No. The TOTM is a Direct Vendor Delivery (DVD) item that is not intended for long term storage like 

the MRE, and should be disposed of when the shelf life expires.
No. 11-6833.

#### Javier Diaz-Bey, Petitioner v. W. Hill, et al.

565 U.S. 1118, 132 S. Ct. 1008,

181 L. Ed. 2d 746,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 401.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 435 Fed. Appx. 228.