alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-7150.

#### Enrique Iglesias, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1087, 132 S. Ct. 830,

181 L. Ed. 2d 541,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8684.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Montana Fourth Judicial District Court. County of Missoula.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- LAURRIE ANNE JEAKINS, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-09-625

DECISION

*26Done in open Court this 8th day of April, 2016.

DATED this 3rd day of May, 2016.

On October 2, 2015, the Defendant’s suspended sentence was revoked for violation of conditions and was sentenced to a commitment of eight (8) years to the Montana Women’s Prison, with four (4) years suspended. The terms and conditions of the suspended portion of the Judgment remained the same as those contained in the Judgment filed with the Court on June 10, 2010. The Defendant received credit for time served in the amount of two hundred and six (206) days.

On April 8, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Peter Ohman, of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member and Hon. Brad Newman, Member.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Unsolicited Multi-Project (P01) Grant Applications.                    

*Date:*                         March 20, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         11 a.m. to 2 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6700-B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Roberta Binder, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Rm 2155, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-7966,                         *rb169n@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 20, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-4191 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0079 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BETHANY LYNN LEX,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 8, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 2 2023

08/02/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0079
No. 10-11019.

#### Eric Jones, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1078,

181 L. Ed. 2d 795,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 416.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

*796Former decision, 565 U.S. 862, 132 S. Ct. 203, 181 L. Ed. 2d 108, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6068.
No. 11M51.

#### San Carlos Apache Tribe, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1091, 132 S. Ct. 865,

181 L. Ed. 2d 546,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 9002.

December 12, 2011.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.

Same case below, 639 F.3d 1346.
No. 11-7570.

#### Jerome Wayne Johnson, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1135, 132 S. Ct. 1061,

181 L. Ed. 2d 778,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 327.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 20 8 DB 2019 (No. 9 RST 2020)

:

JEANMARIE BROWNE : Attorney Registration No. 75745

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM RETIRED STATUS : ( Lehigh County )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30 th day of January

, 2020 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinary Board Member dated January 23 , 2020

, is approved and it is ORDERED that

Jeanmarie Browne

, who has been on Retired Status

, has never been suspended or

disbarred, and has demonstrated that s he has the moral qualifications, competency and

learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is,

hereby reinstated to active status as a member of th e Bar of this Commonwealth. The

expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall

be paid by the Petitioner.
************************

• MONOGRAPH NO.: 7A2

************************

ITEM: Hot Pepper Sauce (HSA)

NSN: 8950-01-101-9897 ITEM SPECIFICATION: A-A-20097

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 20

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

 APPEARANCE: Red to reddish brown liquid.

 ODOR: Pungent, vinegary, peppery.

 FLAVOR: Slightly to moderately sweet, moderate pepper oil,

slight vinegar, slight woody, well blended, slight afterburn.

 TEXTURE: Smooth (thin) suspension of red pepper without

stratification or separation

 ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT 70 DEGREES F: 36 months

 80 DEGREES F: 24 months

 90 DEGREES F: 18 months

 100 DEGREES F: 12 months

EXPECTED DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

 APPEARANCE: Red color fades to yellowish brown.

 ODOR: No changes noted at time of publication. Remarks will

be provided when available from the field or the accelerated

storage study being conducted by Natick.

 FLAVOR: No changes noted at time of publication. Remarks will be provided

when available from the field or the accelerated

storage study being conducted by Natick.

 TEXTURE: Moderate sedimentation as opposed to slight

sedimentation that is characteristically normal.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: Product should be tasted by

itself initially and in small quantities only. Subsequent

evaluation should be done when used on the entree that it was

packed with. Due to the spicy nature of the product, it should be the last

component organoleptically evaluated to prevent carryover to other samples and

consequent masking of their odor and flavor.

SPECIAL NOTES: Screw caps shall be secured to bottles with a

band of plastic shrink film or sealing tape. If shrink film or

sealing tape is loose or deteriorating, annotate the inspection

worksheet accordingly but do not score as a defect unless the

contents are leaking out.
Page 1 of 1 **UNITED STA TES ENVIRONMENTA**  **L PROTECTION A GENCY** 

**WA SHINGTON, D.C. 20460**  **OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND**  **POLLUTION PREVENTION MEMORANDUM**  **Date:** 14 - AUG - 2013 **SUBJECT:** Prometry

n in/ on Snap Beans and Dill. Addition of a Tolerance for Residues of Prometry n in/ on Dill, Oil
. **PC Code:** 080805 **DP Barcode:** D4 14069 **Decision No.:** 467531 **Registration No. :**  100 - 620 **Petition No.:** 2E8052 **Regulatory Action:** Amended Section 3 **Risk Assessment Type:** NA **Case No.:** 0467 **T XR No.:**  NA **CAS No.:** 7287 - 19 - 6 **MRID Nos.:** NA **40 CFR:** §180.222 **FROM:** Sarah J. L ev y, Chemist

Risk Assessment Branch 1 (RAB1) Health Effects Division (HED) (7509P) **THROUGH:** George F. Kramer, Ph.D., Branch Senior Chemist

Dana M. Vogel, Branch Chief RAB1/HED (7509P) **TO:** Barbara Madden, RM 05

Registration Division (RD; 7505P) This memorandum pertains ONLY to the commodity dill, oil associated with Petition No. 2E8052 and serves to update the following three HED document s: HED risk assessment ( D403975 ), residue chemistry chapter ( D408525 ), and dietary exposure assessment ( D408528 ). All conclusions in these three documents remain adequate, and unchanged, for this petition, with the exception of adding a tolerance for res idues of p rometry n in/ on dill, oil. In conjunction with petition 2E8052 , t he Interregional Research Project No. 4 (I R - 4) propose d the establishment of permanent tolerances for residues of prometry n per se in/on dill, oil at 1 .3 ppm. HED originally

stated that a tolerance was not necessary for this commodity . However, upon further consideration by HED Management and Barbara Madden of RD, HED is now recommend ing for the tolerance proposed b y IR - 4 :

Dill, oil
................................ ................................ ................. 1.3 ppm
cc: S. Levy RDI: G. Kramer ( 14 - AUG - 20 13 ); D. Vogel ( 14 - AUG - 20 13 ) S. Levy : S - 109 5 3: Potomac Yard 1 (PY1): (703) 305
- 0783 : 7509P: RAB1
Exhibit 31

Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2017-B1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; LNR Partners, LLC; Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC; Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas; CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.; National Tax Search, LLC; AEGON USA Realty Advisors, LLC; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; and KeyBank National Association. 

Date:March 27, 2020

|  | /s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

CGCMT 2017-B1 Certifications
<PAGE>   1




                                   EXHIBIT 11



V-TWIN ACQUISITIONS, INC.
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND 1998



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Three Months
                                                                               Ended Sept. 30,               Sept. 30,
                                                                                   1999                         1998
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                                            <C>                           <C>
Shares Outstanding                                                               3,700,000                     3,000,000
Weighted average shares outstanding                                              3,650,000                     3,000,000
Net Income (Loss)                                                              $   (91,892)                  $   (10,000)
Total Net Income (Loss) Available for Common Stockholders'                     $   (91,892)                  $        --
                                                                               ===========                   ===========

Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
Earnings (Loss) Per Share                                                      $     (0.02)                  $      0.00
                                                                               -----------                   -----------
</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

NICOLE ASHLEY MUINA, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D21-2696

LT Case No. 2021-MM-000133-A

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed May 10, 2022

Appeal from the County Court 

for Citrus County, 

Mark J. Yerman, Judge. 

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and 

Betty Wyatt, Assistant Public Defender, 

Daytona Beach, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown 

Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, 

Daytona Beach, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

EVANDER, HARRIS and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.
Dismiss and Opinion Filed June 10, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-00078-CV

ARLENE MCQUARY AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, Appellant

V.

CORTONA GARDENS MULTIFAMILY DALLAS LP, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 007-03940-2021

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Carlyle, and Goldstein

Opinion by Justice Goldstein

After appellant failed to timely file her brief, we directed appellant by postcard 

dated May 2, 2022 to file her brief within ten days and cautioned her that failure to 

do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellant has not filed her brief or otherwise 

corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 
–2–

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 

42.3(b),(c).

/Bonnie Lee Goldstein//

BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

ARLENE MCQUARY AND ALL 

OTHER OCCUPANTS, Appellant

No. 05-22-00078-CV V.

CORTONA GARDENS 

MULTIFAMILY DALLAS LP, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at 

Law No. 7, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 007-03940-

2021.

Opinion delivered by Justice 

Goldstein. Justices Myers and 

Carlyle participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED.

Judgment entered this 10th day of June, 2022.
NUMBER 13-19-00281-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF A.G.W., A CHILD

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 438th District Court 

of Bexar County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

Appellant Jennifer Wallace perfected an appeal from an order in a suit modifying 

the parent-child relationship.1 On June 18, 2019, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant 

that the clerk’s record in the above cause was originally due on June 10, 2019, and that 

the Deputy District Clerk, Krystal Gonzalez, had notified this Court that appellant failed to 

make arrangements for payment of the clerk’s record. The Clerk of this Court notified 

 

1 The appeal was transferred to this Court from the Fourth Court of Appeals by order of the Texas 

Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.220(a) (delineating the jurisdiction of appellate courts); 

id. § 73.001 (granting the supreme court the authority to transfer cases from one court of appeals to another 

at any time that there is “good cause” for the transfer). 
2

appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be 

done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised that, if the defect 

was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would 

be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. 

Appellant has failed to respond to this Court’s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is 

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c). 

GINA M. BENAVIDES,

Justice

Delivered and filed the

25th day of July, 2019.
No. 11-6924.

#### Willie Mitchell, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1044, 132 S. Ct. 600,

181 L. Ed. 2d 440,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8160.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 435 Fed. Appx. 174.
No. 11-7535.

#### Paul Pennant, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1149, 132 S. Ct. 1058,

181 L. Ed. 2d 793,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 545.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4674 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4674

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 110 North Chestnut Street in Olathe, Kansas, as the ``Governor John 
                 Anderson, Jr. Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2006

 Mr. Moore of Kansas (for himself, Mr. Tiahrt, Mr. Ryun of Kansas, and 
Mr. Moran of Kansas) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 110 North Chestnut Street in Olathe, Kansas, as the ``Governor John 
                 Anderson, Jr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GOVERNOR JOHN ANDERSON, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 110 North Chestnut Street in Olathe, Kansas, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Governor John Anderson, Jr. Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Governor 
John Anderson, Jr. Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

IANDY JIMENEZ, DOC #T78277, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4210 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed August 14, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Neil A. Roddenbery, Judge. Rachael E. Reese of O'Brien Hatfield, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
KELLY, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.