alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016225EN.01000301.xml

| 22.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/3

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

1

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 225/04)

Decisions granting an authorisation

Decisions granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2016) 3549 | 16 June 2016 | Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP)
  EC No 204-211-0
  CAS No 117-81-7 | VinyLoop Ferrara S.p.A. |
| Via Marconi, 73 |
| 44100 Ferrara |
| Italy |

Reference of the decision (2)

2

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2016) 3549

16 June 2016

Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP)

EC No 204-211-0

CAS No 117-81-7

VinyLoop Ferrara S.p.A.

Via Marconi, 73

44100 Ferrara

Italy

REACH/16/2/0

REACH/16/2/3

Formulation of recycled soft poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) containing DEHP in compounds and dry-blends.

Industrial use of recycled soft PVC containing DEHP in polymer processing by calendering, extrusion, compression and injection moulding to produce PVC articles except: toys and childcare articles; erasers; adult toys (sex toys and other articles for adults with intensive contact with mucous membranes); household articles smaller than 10 cm that children can suck or chew on; consumer textiles/clothing intended to be worn against the bare skin; cosmetics and food contact materials regulated under sector-specific Union legislation.

21 February 2019

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socioeconomic benefits outweigh the risk to human health arising from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies in terms of their technical and economic feasibility for the applicants and some of their downstream users.

| Stena Recycling AB |
| --- |
| Fiskhamnsgatan 8 |
| 400 40 Göteborg |
| Sweden |

Stena Recycling AB

Fiskhamnsgatan 8

400 40 Göteborg

Sweden

REACH/16/2/1

REACH/16/2/4

| Plastic Planet srl |
| --- |
| Via N. Copernico 16 |
| 35013 Cittadella |
| Italy |

Plastic Planet srl

Via N. Copernico 16

35013 Cittadella

Italy

REACH/16/2/2

REACH/16/2/5

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/chemicals/reach/about/index_en.htm

2

---
************************

• MONOGRAPH NO.: 1D1

************************

ITEM: Waffles, Blueberry, Shelf Stable (WBB)

NSN: 8920 01 430 7027 ITEM SPECIFICATION: CID A A 20234

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: medium-dark brown exterior, interior is grayish blue with specks of

blueberry; uniform waffle marks with flecks of blueberry showing

ODOR: sugary; artificial blueberry; caramelized

FLAVOR: sugary; slight artificial blueberry; caramelized

TEXTURE: slightly spongy interior; chewy crust; soft

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36 months

 100 DEGREES F: 6 months

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

Appearance: darkened; further immigration of blueberry dye into crumb and crust

Odor: rancid; change or loss of berry odor; staling

Flavor: rancid; change or loss of berry flavor; staling

Texture: dry; chewy; hardened

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: none
EXHIBIT 3.3

AMENDMENT NO. 1  TO THE  MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION  AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS

This
Amendment No. 1 to the Mack-Cali Realty Corporation Amended and Restated Bylaws (the "By-laws"), duly adopted on June 10, 1999, shall be
effective as of March 4, 2003. All terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the By-laws.

Section 2
of Article III of the Corporation's By-laws shall be amended and restated as follows:



---



The undersigned, being the duly empowered Secretary of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, a Maryland corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that
this Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company was adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company on March 4, 2003.

| | /s/ROGER W. THOMASRoger W. Thomas
Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
Order entered January 1 8 , 2023

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 21 - 00974 - CR No. 05 - 21 - 00975 - CR No. 05 - 21 - 00976 - CR DERICK TOBAR - GONZALEZ , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 219 - 80103 - 2020, 219 - 80104 - 2020, 219 - 80105 - 2020 O RDER We ORDER Tonya Lebo, Official Court Reporter in and for the 219th District Court of Collin County, to file , by JANUARY 27, 2023, a supplemental record of the pre - trial hearing and any other proceedings that took place in these cases on October 11, 2021

. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this order to counsel for all parties. /s/ ROBBIE PARTIDA

- KIPNESS PRESIDING JUSTICE
ERSKIN L. WHITE

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2675

________ _____________________/

Opinion filed October 7, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

.

Erskin L. White, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, KELSEY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
APP B

 DSCPM 4155.2

************************

• MONOGRAPH NO.: 6A1

************************

ITEM: Cherry Beverage Base (BBC)

NSN: 8960-01-295-1149 ITEM SPECIFICATION: MIL-B-35023

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 150

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

 APPEARANCE: Dehydrated: Red, Fine powder, Dehydrated: Reddish, clear

liquid.

 ODOR: Sweet, artificial cherry.

 FLAVOR: Sweet, artificial cherry.

 TEXTURE: Free flowing, fine powder, without lumps that cannot

be broken apart by light finger pressure.

 ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT 70 DEGREES F: 36 months

 80 DEGREES F: 30 months

 90 DEGREES F: 24 months

 100 DEGREES F: 18 months

EXPECTED DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

 APPEARANCE: Rehydrated: Coagulated, gelation, surface

frothing or cloudiness, excessive sediment significantly

affecting aesthetic appearance or flavor.

 ODOR: Burnt, scorched, moldy/mildew.

 FLAVOR: Oxidized or any other flavor not typical of the type

of beverage.

 TEXTURE: Lumpy or caked, not free flowing.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: Prepare beverage IAW package

instructions. Product should dissolve completely within about two minutes.

SPECIAL NOTES: If slight sedimentation and clouding are observed

but the odor and flavor are normal, do not score the sedimentation as a defect

during surveillance inspection; make note of it in the narrative for future

use. Coagulation/gelation may occur if the original formulation was incorrect

or if the product has been temperature abused for a long time.

Coagulation/gelation presents as clumps of granules that do not readily

dissolve when product is reconstituted. Particles tend to float in suspension

(look like gel pockets or tapioca granules that are clumped together). Product

is packed in a flexible package and designed to yield approximately 12 ounces

per serving.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4653 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4653

 To repeal a prohibition on the use of certain funds for tunneling in 
 certain areas with respect to the Los Angeles to San Fernando Valley 
                    Metro Rail project, California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 22, 2005

  Mr. Waxman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal a prohibition on the use of certain funds for tunneling in 
 certain areas with respect to the Los Angeles to San Fernando Valley 
                    Metro Rail project, California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROHIBITION.

    The second sentence of section 321 of the Department of 
Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1986 (99 Stat. 
1287) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIGUEL ANGEL QUEZADA, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-72674 

Agency No. A078-008-133 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 22, 2018**

Before: SILVERMAN, GRABER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Miguel Angel Quezada, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision finding him ineligible for asylum and withholding of 

removal, and denying relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 29 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-72674 

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the 

agency’s particularly serious crime determination. Avendano-Hernandez v. Lynch, 

800 F.3d 1072, 1077 (9th Cir. 2015). We review for substantial evidence the 

agency’s factual findings. Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008).

We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in determining that Quezada’s

conviction for possession of cocaine for sale under California Health and Safety 

Code § 11351 was a particularly serious crime, where drug trafficking crimes are 

presumed to be particularly serious, and the BIA considered the correct factors in 

concluding Quezada failed to rebut that presumption. See Miguel-Miguel v. 

Gonzales, 500 F.3d 941, 949 (9th Cir. 2007) (recognizing the “strong presumption”

that drug trafficking offenses are particularly serious); Avendano-Hernandez, 800 

F.3d at 1077 (“Our review is limited to ensuring that the agency relied on the 

appropriate factors and proper evidence to reach this conclusion.” (internal 

quotations omitted)).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief, where 

Quezada failed to show that it is more likely than not he would be tortured by or 

with the acquiescence of a government official in Mexico. See 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1208.18(a)(1); Silaya, 524 F.3d at 1073. The record does not support Quezada’s 

contention that the agency failed to consider his claim in the totality. See 
3 16-72674 

Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 2010) (the agency must consider 

the issues raised and express its decision “in terms sufficient to enable a reviewing 

court to perceive that it has heard and thought and not merely reacted” (citation 

and quotation marks omitted)).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Michael D. Lohner, as President and Chief Executive Officer of Home
Interiors & Gifts, Inc., (the Company) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge: (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending June 30, 2004
as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: August 12, 2004 /s/ MICHAEL D. LOHNERMichael D. LohnerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
No. 09-8080.

#### Bruce McDowell, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 949, 130 S. Ct. 1531,

176 L. Ed. 2d 130,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1236.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# C_2018204EN.01021101.xml

| 13.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/211 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/211

---

P8_TA(2016)0362

Adoption of amendments to a Commission proposal (interpretation of Rule 61(2) of the Rules of Procedure)

European Parliament decision of 15 September 2016 concerning the adoption of amendments to a Commission proposal (interpretation of Rule 61(2) of the Rules of Procedure) (2016/2218(REG))

(2018/C 204/26)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the letter of 13 September 2016 from the Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the letter of 13 September 2016 from the Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs,

| — | having regard to Rule 226 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 226 of its Rules of Procedure,

| 1. | Decides to append the following interpretation to Rule 61(2) of the Rules of Procedure:
  ‘Nothing prevents Parliament from deciding to hold, if appropriate, a concluding debate following the report by the Committee responsible to which the matter has been referred back.’ |
| --- | --- |

1.

Decides to append the following interpretation to Rule 61(2) of the Rules of Procedure:

‘Nothing prevents Parliament from deciding to hold, if appropriate, a concluding debate following the report by the Committee responsible to which the matter has been referred back.’

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information.

---
No. 10-11263.

#### Douglas Allen Hazelwood, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 875, 132 S. Ct. 236,

181 L. Ed. 2d 133,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6988.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 412 Fed. Appx. 617.
No. 11-6912.

#### William C. Breland, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1153, 132 S. Ct. 1096,

181 L. Ed. 2d 973,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 766.

January 17, 2012.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of the position asserted by the Solicitor General in his brief for the United States filed on December 19, 2011.

Same case below, 647 F.3d 284.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 148 (Monday, August 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 41264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20595]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


District Consumer Forum; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's), Office of Consumer 
Affairs (OCA) the Office of Regulatory Affairs (ORA) offices in 
Illinois, Michigan, and Indiana in cooperation with the U.S. Dept. of 
Health and Human Services Office of Minority Health, Office of Public 
Health Sciences, Region V, Illinois Department of Public Health, Center 
for Minority Health Services and Asian Health Coalition of Illinois, 
Chicago Department of Health, Chicago Hispanic Health Coalition, U. S. 
Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service, Regional Office, 
Midwest Field Office, Health Resources and Services Administration, and 
the University of Illinois Extension Chicago Cooperative Extension 
Center is announcing a district consumer forum. The forum will provide 
an opportunity for consumers, community-based organizations, patient 
advocates, health professionals, and industry to participate in open 
discussions on health issues and agency regulatory actions with FDA 
officials.
    Date and Time: The forum will be held on Tuesday, August 18, 1998, 
from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m.

    Location: The forum will be held at the Sears Tower, 233 South 
Wacker Dr., Lincoln Ballroom, 33d Fl., Chicago, IL 60606.
    Contact: Kimberly Phillips, Chicago District Office, Office of 
Regulatory Affairs, 300 South Riverside Plaza, suite 550-South, 
Chicago, IL 60606, 312-353-7126, FAX 312-886-3280.
    Registration: Send registration information (including name, title, 
firm name, address, telephone, and fax number) to the contact person by 
August 10, 1998. Every effort will be made to accommodate all 
registrants. However because space is limited, admittance is on a 
``first come, first serve basis.''
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact Kimberly Phillips (address above) by August 10, 1998.
    Transcripts: Transcripts of the forum may be requested in writing 
from the Freedom of Information Office (HFI-35), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, rm. 12A-16, Rockville, MD 20857, 
approximately 15 working days after the forum, at a cost of 10 cents 
per page.

    Dated: July 28, 1998.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 98-20595 Filed 7-31-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
(1) Adjusting Price $16.89 CWT

(2) Base Price $16.15 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.74

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0636

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0318

Price change per quart $0.0159

Price change per pint $0.0080

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0060

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0050

Price change per half pint $0.0040

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.06

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.03

Price adjustment per quart $0.02

Price adjustment per pint $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Dept. of Food and Agriculture Announcement of Minimum Prices

 Effective Date: Sept. 2, 2018
ITEM: Salsa/Picante Sauce, Mild, 20 oz squeezable bottle ************************

(SAL) Ancillary * MONOGRAPH: 7B5

************************

NSN: 8950-01-487-7784 ITEM SPECIFICATION: COMMERCIAL

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Color shall be typical of salsa, red to medium brown. Sauce shall be of 

a diced vegetable size up to 1⁄2 inch (1.27 cm) in diameter. There shall be no excess 

liquid media or severe weeping of product. 

ODOR: Sauce shall have a pungent odor that is well balanced and peppery and shall be 

free from off-odors. 

FLAVOR: Sauce shall have a good flavor that is well balanced and peppery and shall be 

free of off-flavors, with no bitter, burnt, or sour taste.

TEXTURE: Sauce shall be moderately thick with pieces or chunks of vegetables.

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 18 months

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

APPEARANCE: May darken and/or show signs of syneresis.

ODOR: May become sour and/or emit off odors.

FLAVOR: May become sour and/or bitter.

TEXTURE: Syneresis may occur.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None.
No. 09-7853.

#### Dennis H. Wendell, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the Northern District of New York.

559 U.S. 963, 130 S. Ct. 1570,

176 L. Ed. 2d 152,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1053,

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 11-7048.

#### Lincoln Keith, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 1122, 132 S. Ct. 1022,

181 L. Ed. 2d 754,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 188.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Montana Eighteenth Judicial District Court. County of Gallatin.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- ANTHONY JOSEPH WELLBROOK, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-15-099

DECISION

On March 9, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced as follows: Count I: Ten (10) years to the Montana State Prison, for the offense of Criminal Endangerment, a Felony, in violation of §45-5-207, MCA; and Count V: Ten (10) years to the Montana State Prison for the offense of Aggravated Assault, a Felony, in violation of §45-5-202, MCA. The sentences under Counts I and V were ordered to be served concurrently. The Court ordered that the Defendant have no contact with Ashlee Wellbrook, Elizabeth Cozart, Spencer Bullock, Jordan Jonson, or Eric Adams unless any of them makes written requests for contact. The Defendant was ordered to register as a violent offender pursuant to §46-23-504, MCA. The Court granted credit for time served in the amount of 349 days.

On August 4, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant appeared by Vision Net from Crossroads Correctional Center and was represented by Brent Getty of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is *88presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

Done in open Court this 4th day of August, 2016.

DATED this 24th day of August, 2016.

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member and Hon. Brad Newman, Member.
No. 09-8325.

#### Michael Dewayne Bell, Petitioner v. Douglas Samuels, et al.

559 U.S. 953, 130 S. Ct. 1543,

176 L. Ed. 2d 137,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1477.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.