alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 09-8563.

#### Craig Bundrant, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

559 U.S. 1000, 130 S. Ct. 1891,

176 L. Ed. 2d 356,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2525.

March 22, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
No. 11-7796.

#### Preston Levonne Buie, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1170, 132 S. Ct. 1123,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1002,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 600.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 441 Fed. Appx. 173.
No. 09-665.

#### Saul Gregorio Martinez, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

559 U.S. 1005, 130 S. Ct. 1883,

176 L. Ed. 2d 362,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2670.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 557 F.3d 1059.
**
**Exhibit 34.16**

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Managing Member 

Park Bridge Lender Services LLC 

New York, NY 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in theaccompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of 2018 Compliance by Park Bridge Lender Services LLC with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”), that Park Bridge Lender Services LLC (the “Company”)complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB (item 1122(d)) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, excluding those criteria determined by managementand noted as not applicable (N/A) within Exhibit B to Management’s Report. The transactions covered by this report are only those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trust advisor or operating advisor for the asset backedsecurities transactions (the “Platform”) identified in Management’s Report. Reference Exhibit A to Management’s Report for the transactions covered by this examination. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliancewith the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination. 

We conducted our examination in accordance with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).Those standards require that we plan and perform theexamination to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Company complied with the applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d). Our examination included tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform,determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Ourprocedures were limited to the selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset backed transactionincluded in the Platform. Further an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the Company’s servicingactivities during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

In our opinion, management’sassertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit B to Management’s Report with respect to the transactions identified in Exhibit A to Management’s Report as of and for the yearended December 31, 2018, for the Platform, is fairly stated, in all material aspects. 

 

/s/ Katz, Sapper & Miller, LLP

New York, New York

February 20, 2019

 
1 

**
No. 09-8853.

#### Richard Darnell Johnson, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 988, 130 S. Ct. 1729,

176 L. Ed. 2d 206,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1960.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 575 F.3d 900.
No. 09-8501.

#### Sergio Garcia-Aparicio, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 958, 130 S. Ct. 1557,

176 L. Ed. 2d 145,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1428.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 333 Fed. Appx. 282.
No. 09-6832.

#### Larry Jongewaard, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 941, 130 S. Ct. 1502,

176 L. Ed. 2d 118,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1330.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 567 F.3d 336.
No. 11-7890.

#### In re Kris E. Helton, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 1155, 132 S. Ct. 1129,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1010,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 697.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
No. 11-7455.

#### Kurt Jones, Petitioner v. Franklin J. Tennis, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rockview, et al.

565 U.S. 1166, 132 S. Ct. 1113,

181 L. Ed. 2d 995,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 842.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
21 September 2009 *******************************

NSN: 8920 01 579 7973 (BIA) * MONOGRAPH NO: M4A16

 ******************************

Item: Filled Bakery Item, Apple Turnover (Type III)

Document: MIL-DTL-32221, Filled Bakery Item, Shelf Stable, for Operational Rations 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 275 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Bread: No compression streaks.

Crust: Uniform medium golden brown color, no excessive flour dusting, visible dark 

brown cinnamon flakes.

Filling: Visible fruit pieces throughout the tan to pale yellow colored gel matrix. No 

leakage through the bread portion.

Odor: Sweet cooked apple pie.

Flavor: Sweet cooked apple pie.

Texture:

Bread: Slightly dense and uniform cell structure. Not excessively dry and crumbly or 

excessively moist and gummy.

Filling: Not excessively thin or runny.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkened or browned crumb. Cracked crust, dry, crumbly bread. Dry filling.

Odor: Stale, oxidized, rancid, scorched.

Flavor: Stale, oxidized, rancid, scorched, fermented, bitter.

Texture: Dry, crumbly, or excessively moist bread.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures:

This product should contain an oxygen scavenger packet. If defects such as oxidized or rancid odors 

exist, they are likely due to package failure or the absence of an oxygen scavenger.

Special Notes:

Each pouch shall contain one intact turnover and one intact oxygen scavenger. Some bleeding of filling 

into the bread crumb is normal but may increase over time. Product shall be in a half circle shape.
No. 09-8333.

#### Evelyn Bowman-Goone, Petitioner v. Joseph Gordon, Justice, Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, et al.

559 U.S. 993, 130 S. Ct. 1738,

176 L. Ed. 2d 215,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2260,

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kiran Patel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Solectron Corporation on Form 10-K for the annual period ended August 27, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Solectron Corporation.

Date:   November 5, 2004

                                        /s/ Kiran Patel
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Kiran Patel
                                        Executive Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-8351.

#### Lawrence M. Jiron, Petitioner v. Pattie P. Swift, District Court of Colorado, Alamosa County, et al.

559 U.S. 993, 130 S. Ct. 1741,

176 L. Ed. 2d 216,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2277.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 330 Fed. Appx. 768.
No. D-2719.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Gregory Bartko.

565 U.S. 1054, 132 S. Ct. 812,

181 L. Ed. 2d 522,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8399.

November 28, 2011.

Gregory Bartko, of Atlanta, Georgia, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
3 d,- 2 

B 

A 

0.RAW'ING PAGE 1 IS A NON-OIT Al.£0 SKIT CH OR 

PHOTOTIIAT lSUS£0AlONGWJTH PAG£S2AA03 

PRODUCT OATASIICCTS,APPOIDIXA.RMSJON OTO 

BC usm TOCOMPAA.£SI-ID.T£fl. SYSTD.CSAAO 

SUPPORT COMPONGITS f.'OR PROCURD.IOIT BY US 

MJUTARYUS£RS. THEOOCUMENTSWILLBEPOST£0 

f."OR R£Vl�V ON Ttl E 01.AM IL W£BSJTE. 

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT: 

DISTRIBUTION FOR THIS DOCUMENT, 

SPECIFICATION AND GRAPHIC ARE 

AUTHORIZED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. 

4 I

3 � ITAR CATAGORY N/A 2 NON-SENSITIVE 

I 

MANUFACTURER 

TITLE 

PART NUMBER 

APPROVED BY 

SIZE NIA SCALE NIA 

1 

B 

CAGE CODE 

A 

DATE 

WEIGHT NIA PAGE 1 OF 2

Heater, Tent
APPENDIX A 

Revision D

Company / Cage Code

Manfacturing Source Company

Part Number / NSN 

HEATER, TENT PRODUCT DATA SHEET 

Specifications as applicable

Type

Nominal Output in BTU’s

Fuel Type

Fuel Supply Connection

Electric requirement

Liquid Fuel Capacity

Run Time at maximum Output

Duct Size

Weight (Unpackaged) (lb)

Stovepipe Opening Size

Special/Additional Features:
No. 09-7553.

#### Robert Zane Curl, Petitioner v. California.

559 U.S. 1009, 130 S. Ct. 1881,

176 L. Ed. 2d 369,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2705.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.

Same case below, 46 Cal. 4th 339, 207 P.3d 2.
No. 09-792.

#### Thomas Rempfer, Petitioner v. Margaret Hamburg, Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration, et al.

559 U.S. 973, 130 S. Ct. 1707,

176 L. Ed. 2d 183,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2192.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 388 U.S. App. D.C. 226, 583 F.3d 860.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 145 (Wednesday, July 29, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40386-40387]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20283]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 62

[CO-001-0026b; FRL-6131-8]


Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated 
Facilities and Pollutants; Colorado; Control of Landfill Gas Emissions 
From Existing Municipal Solid Waste Landfills

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to approve the Colorado plan and 
associated regulations for implementing the Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) 
Landfill Emission Guidelines at 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cc, which were 
required pursuant to section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act (Act). The 
State's plan, which was submitted to EPA on April 13, 1998, establishes 
performance standards for existing MSW landfills and provides for the 
implementation and enforcement of those standards.
    In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register, the EPA is 
approving the State's submittal in a direct final rule without prior 
proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial action and 
anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval 
is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are 
received in response to the direct final rule, no further activity is 
contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule 
will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in 
a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not 
institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting 
should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments must be received in writing on or before August 28, 
1998.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on this action may be mailed to Vicki 
Stamper, 8P2-A, at the EPA Regional VIII Office listed. Copies of the 
documents relevant to this proposed rule are available for public 
inspection during normal business hours at the Air Program, 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII, 999 18th Street, Suite 
500, Denver, Colorado 80202-2466. Copies of the State documents 
relevant to this proposed rule are available for public inspection at 
the Air Pollution Control Division, Colorado Department of Public 
Health and Environment, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, Colorado 
80222-1530.


[[Page 40387]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vicki Stamper, EPA Region VIII, (303) 
312-6445.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the information provided in the Direct 
Final action of the same title which is located in the Rules and 
Regulations section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: July 20, 1998.
William P. Yellowtail,
Regional Administrator, Region VIII.
[FR Doc. 98-20283 Filed 7-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
HOSPITAL HOSPITAL

Parents

Parents

Ch

i

ldcare providers

Ch

i

ldcare providers

Brothers & sister

s

Brothers & sister

s

Grandparents

Grandparents

2

months

4

months

6

months

15thru 18

months

4 thru 6

years

Create a circle of protection around your baby 

This vaccine 

helps protect 

you from 

whooping 

cough and 

passes some 

protection to 

your baby.

I got my 

whooping cough 

vaccine and will 

encourage 

everyone caring 

for my baby to 

get a shot, too!

www.cdc.gov/whoopingcough

About half of 

infants who 

get whooping 

cough are 

hospitalized!

Whooping cough 

(pertussis) is a 

respiratory infection 

that can cause 

severe coughing or 

trouble breathing. 1out of 2

1out of 2

 Whooping cough cases 

 across the U.S. have been 

on the rise since the 1980s.

Protect Babies from 

Whooping Cough Whooping cough is deadly for babies

*When source 

 was identified

4out of

babies who get 

5

whooping cough

catch it from 

someone at home*

Like it?

Tell a friend!

It’s important!

Make sure your baby gets all doses 5

of whooping cough vaccine on time

Your baby needs whooping cough vaccine at:

If you’re

pregnant

get a Tdap shot!

Everyone needs whooping cough vaccine:

You can get whooping cough vaccines at a doctor’s 

office, local health department, or pharmacy

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention NCIRD ig301.pv4 | 3.11.13
# FILED December 6, 1995 Cecil Crowson, Jr. App ellate C ou rt Clerk I N THECOUR

TOFAP PEALS OFTENNES S EE EA S TER N S EC TI O N

DEBR A W HI TE ) KNOX C OUNTY ) 03A 01- 9505- C

V - 00165 P l a i n tif f - A

p p e lla n t )

) ) v. ) HON. W HEELER R OS ENBALM

, ) J UDGE ) RO BI N M ERRI TT, J U

D Y M ERRI TT, ) a nd BI LLS H

A R P ) ) D e f e n d a n t s - A

p p e l l ees ) AFF I R M ED AND R

EM ANDED

DENNI S B . FR

ANC I S OFKNOXVI LLEF OR AP PELLANT TER R Y L. ADKI NS OFKNOXVI LLEF OR AP PELLEEBI LLS HAR P

O PI N I O N
G odda r d, P . J .
Pur s ua nt t o R

ul e 54 of t he Te nne s s e e R ul e s of A

ppe l l a t e Pr o ced u r e , t h e P l a i n t i f f , D e b r a W h i t e , ap p eal s an o r d e r o f s um m a r y j udgm

e nt e nt e r e d i n f a vor of t he D e f e nda nt , Bi l l S ha r p. M s . W hi t e s ought da m

a ge s s he s uf f e r e d a s a r e s ul t of a dog bi t e . The s ui t w

a s br ought a ga i ns t M r . S ha r p, t he ow

ne r of t he pr e m

i s e s w he r e t he dog w

a s ke pt , a nd hi s t e na nt s , R obi n M e r r i t t a nd J udy1 Ru l e 10 . (a ) A f f i r m a n c e W i t hout O

p i n i o n . T h e Co u r t, with th e c onc u r r e n c e of al l j udge s par t i c i p a t i ng i n t h e ca s e , m a y af f i r m

t h e ac t i on of t h e t r i a l cour t by or d e r w i t hout r e nde r i ng a f o r m a l opi n i on w

h e n an opi n i o n woul d have no pr e c e d e n t i a l val u e and one or m o r e of t h e f o l l o w i n g c i r c u m

s t a n ces exi s t an d ar e d i spo s i t i v e o f t h e ap p eal : ( 1 ) t h e Co u r t co n c u r s i n t h e f act s as f o u n d o r as f o u n d b y n ecess a r y i m p l i c a t i on by t h e t r i a l cour t . ( 2 ) t h e r e i s m

a t e r i a l evi d e n c e t o s uppor t t h e ver d i c t of t h e j u r y . ( 3 ) n o r e v e r s i b l e er r o r o f l a w ap p ear s . S u c h cases m

a y b e af f i r m

e d as f o l l o ws : "Af f i r m e d i n acco r d a n ce w i t h Co u r t o f A

p p eal s Ru l e 1 0 ( a ) . " 2 M e r r i t t , t he ow

ne r s of t he dog. A vol unt a r y non- s ui t w a s t a ke n a s t o M

r . M e r r i t t an d a d e f a u l t j u d g m e n t w a s en t e r e d ag a i n s t M r s . M e r r itt. M

r . S ha r p m

a de a m

ot i on f or s um

m a r y j udgm

e nt w hi c h w a s gr a nt e d. O

ur r e vi e w

of t he r e c or d pe r s ua de s us t hi s i s a n a ppr opr i a t e c a s e f or a f f i r m a nc e unde r R

ul e 10( a ) of t hi s C our t . 1
The Tr i a l C

our t i s a c c or di ngl y a f f i r m e d a nd t he c a us e r e m a nde d f or c ol l e c t i on of c os t s be l ow . C os t s of a ppe a l a r e a dj udge d a ga i ns t t he P l a i nt i f f a nd he r s ur e t y.

_______________________________ H ous t on M

. G odda r d, P . J . CONC UR:

________________________________ H e r s c h e l P . Fr a n k s , J .

________________________________ C l i ffo r d E . S a n d e r s , S r . J .3
|        |     |                                                                                                                           |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|        |     |                                                                                                                                                      |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                             |                                                                                                                                                     |  |  |  |  |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| Date: December 14, 2020 | /s/  David B. Golub                                                   |
|                        | David B. GolubChief Executive Officer                                                                                                               |
|                        |                                                                                                                                                |
|                        | /s/  Ross A. Teune                      |
|                        | Ross A. TeuneChief Financial Officer                                                                                                                |
September 2, 2016 

Mr. Stephen Gowdy 

Gowdy Brothers Aerospace, LLC 

Consultant for Sterling Auction & Realty Services, LLC 

8170 Old Carriage Court N. Suite #200 

Shakopee, MN 55379 

Re: FAA-2016-4526 

Dear Mr. Gowdy: 

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and 

have determined that we will continue to process your petition. 

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov, we 

are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 107 (www.faa.gov/uas) will satisfy your request. We have determined that 

your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your 

petition for exemption. 

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will 

publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments, if we have 

not done so already. 

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst
No. 09-8557.

#### Mark Kirk, Petitioner v. Perry Phelps, Warden.

559 U.S. 983, 130 S. Ct. 1713,

176 L. Ed. 2d 198,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2097.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
ITEM: Stove Top Stuffing Mix/Chicken Flavor ************************ 

(STS) Secondary * MONOGRAPH: 5A9

 ************************ 

NSN: 8920-01-368-7356 ITEM SPECIFICATION: COMMERCIAL ITEM

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: slight gold appearance with a mix of white and brown bread cubes 

interspersed with green herb flakes

ODOR: chicken and herbs

FLAVOR: savory/salty profile with an herb background

TEXTURE: prepared product texture should consist of hydrated soft bread crumb that 

fluffs but still has resistance to the tooth

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 18 months

 100 DEGREES F: 3 months

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

Appearance: golden color may fade and product may darken

Odor: chicken and herb odor may diminish; may detect rancidity

Flavor: chicken flavor diminish; salty flavor may decrease; rancidity may occur

Texture: unprepared product may become hard; prepared product may become gummy 

and less fluffy

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: none