alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016334EN.01000301.xml

| 10.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 334/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 334/3

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

(2016/C 334/03)

Pursuant to Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

1

2

On page 16, in the Explanatory Notes to Chapter 2, under the heading ‘General’, the following point 6 is added:

On page 16, in the Explanatory Notes to Chapter 2, under the heading ‘General

| ‘6. | Meat and meat offal containing preservatives, stabilisers or antioxidants added for stopping the degradation of those products, remain classified in this chapter.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘6.

Meat and meat offal containing preservatives, stabilisers or antioxidants added for stopping the degradation of those products, remain classified in this chapter.’

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 76, 4.3.2015, p. 1.

2

---
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4646 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

7320 Reseda Boulevard in Reseda, California, as the ‘‘Coach John Wooden Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2005 

Mr. SHERMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 7320 Reseda Boulevard in Reseda, California, 

as the ‘‘Coach John Wooden Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JOHN WOODEN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 7320 Reseda Boulevard in 

6 Reseda, California, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Coach John Wooden Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
2 

•HR 4646 IH 

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Coach John Wooden 

3 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ
# C_2016417EN.01000402.xml

| 11.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 417/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 417/4

---

EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2015

(2016/C 417/13)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.easa.europa.eu/the-agency/management-board/decisions/easa-mb-decision-10-2016-opinion-management-board-2015-annual

---
No. 09-8222.

#### Pierre Genevier, Petitioner v. Brian DeMore.

559 U.S. 951, 130 S. Ct. 1537,

176 L. Ed. 2d 133,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1404,

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 329 Fed. Appx. 152.
Nov. 25 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management Sy stem 1200 New Jersey

Ave., SE 

### FAA Docket 2014 **- 0886**  Washington, DC 20590 Re: Petition for Amendment of Section 333 Exemption Based upon Exemption 11204 Issued to Build Imagery , LLC Dear Sir or Madam, Build Imagery LLC ( Build Imagery) herewith applies to amend to our existing Exemption 11204 issued to Build Imagery on March 11,2015 in FAA Docket 2014
- 0886
. The requested amendment would allow Build I magery to operate the DJ I Phant om 3 PRO manufactured b y DJ I
. The Phantom 3 Pro offers unique Vision Positioning technology that is necessary

for some of the specific applications we encounter
. The visual and ultrasonic sensors scan the ground beneath the flight area aide in its position ing accuracy for safer flights. The name and contact information for the applicant are: Daniel Ursitti Build Imagery

L LC 11870 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 106
- 433 West L os Angeles, CA 310
- 467
- 6006 Dursitti@Buildimagery .com Build Imagery intends to operate the Phantom 3 Pro and will operate it in strict compliance with the conditions set forth in Exemption 11204. We understand that such conditions may

be amended or modifie d by the FAA from time to time and we will look to the FAA for guid ance, recommendations and modification to alway s adhere to best our flight operations and procedures. Build Imagery will maintain all of its original "Aerial Sy stems Operations Manuel" and "Flight Checklist" as display ed in 11204. We will additionally

sub mit 1) DJ I Phantom 3 Professional User Manuel These manuals are very

similar to the manuals submitted by Build Imagery in support of the issuance of Exemption 11204 , the manuals will be updated b y Build Imager y and or DJI as needed to reflect any change s to Exemption 11204 , based on amendments thereto. To the extent necessary , Build Imagery refers the FAA to the original exemption submitted by Build Imagery in Docket FAA
- 2014
- 0886 for demonstration of the publicinterest and an equivalent level of safet y. Build Imagery will operate the aircraft in strict

compliance with the conditions in existing the exemption previously granted by

the FAA
. If you have an y questions, please contact the undersigned. Very trul y yours, Daniel Ursitti Build Imagery Dursitti@BuildImagery .com
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4503]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1819-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]


Arkansas; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Arkansas (FEMA-1819-DR), dated February 6, 2009, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: February 24, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Arkansas is hereby amended to include the following 
area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of February 6, 2009.

    Pope County for Public Assistance.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Nancy Ward,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9-4503 Filed 3-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Date: 1 September 2022 ****************************

NSN: 8940-01-564-6101 (CMB) * MONOGRAPH MCW/LRP 13

 ****************************

Item: Chili and Macaroni with Beef, Cooked, Dehydrated

Document: PCR-C-073, Chili and Macaroni with Beef, Cooked, Dehydrated, Packaged in a 

Stand Up Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 570 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Dehydrated product: Mixture of off-white to light tan elbow shaped macaroni, medium 

brown ground beef pieces; dark brown to black kidney beans, covered in a reddishbrown tomato-based free-flowing chili sauce powder. Rehydrated product: Mixture of 

off-white to light tan discernible elbow shaped macaroni, medium brown distinct 

ground beef pieces, dark red kidney beans in a glossy reddish-brown tomato-based 

chili sauce with flecks of chili spices. The finished product may have a reddish-brown 

color from the sauce.

Odor:

Dehydrated product: Chili spice.

Rehydrated product: Cooked macaroni, ground beef, kidney bean, tomato, and chili 

spice.

Flavor: Rehydrated product: Cooked macaroni, ground beef, kidney bean, tomato, and chili 

spice and shall elicit a sensation of mild to moderate heat.

Texture:

Dehydrated product: No wet or soft spots indicating incomplete dehydration.

Rehydrated product: Fully rehydrated within twelve minutes, slightly soft to slightly 

firm macaroni, moist and tender ground beef pieces, slightly soft to slightly firm 

kidney beans (may have slightly dry interior) with a moderately thick sauce.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Dehydrated and Rehydrated: Broken elbow pasta, darkened meat, orange-grey color to 

sauce, thickening of whole product, pasty.

Odor: Dehydrated and Rehydrated: Low odor, loss of chili odor, musty, cardboard, fishy.

Flavor: Dehydrated and Rehydrated: Low spice identity, cardboard flavor, bitter or sour notes, 

oxidized or rancid, grassy, or barnyard tomato, scorched or burnt flavors. 

Texture:

Dehydrated: Hard, tacky, crystalline meat or tomato sauce.

Rehydrated: Un-rehydrated product, dry or tough meat, tough pasta, hard core in beans, 

mushy, poor rehydration, excess water.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

N/A

Special Notes
Date

: 1 September 2022 ****************************

NSN: 8940-01-564-6101 (CMB) * MONOGRAPH MCW/LRP 13

 ****************************

N/A
EXHIBIT
32





Certification of Periodic
Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350








Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Pinnacle Airlines Corp. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned Philip H. Trenary, the President and Chief Executive
Officer, and Peter D. Hunt, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
hereby certify that this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the registrant.








Signature
            Title
            Date/s/
      Philip H. Trenary
            President
      and Chief Executive Officer
            May
      8, 2008Philip
      H. Trenary/s/
      Peter D. Hunt
            Vice
      President and Chief Financial Officer
            May
      8, 2008Peter
      D. Hunt
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6887

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MELVIN MOORING,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:13-cr-00092-LO-1; 1:16-cv-00437-LO)

Submitted: November 16, 2017 Decided: November 21, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin Mooring, Appellant Pro Se. Caitlin Roberts Cottingham, Assistant United States

Attorney, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Melvin Mooring seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the 

notice of appeal was not timely filed.

When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal 

must be filed no more than 60 days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or 

order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). 

“[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” 

Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court's order was entered on the 

docket on August 11, 2016. The notice of appeal was filed, at the earliest, on June 20, 

2017.* Because Mooring failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension 

or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We deny Mooring’s motion for 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis and we dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions areadequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 * For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of 

appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for 

mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1998
<CASH>                                             371
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,305
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,612
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,739
<PP&E>                                          58,751
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,178
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,297
<BONDS>                                         75,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,471)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,178
<SALES>                                         22,047
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,269
<CGS>                                           14,283
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,557)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (266)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (82)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (184)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-7386.

#### Felix Garcia-Tobias, aka Alejandro Garcia-Torres, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1130, 132 S. Ct. 1047,

181 L. Ed. 2d 768,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 55.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 278.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2307

BRUCE KING,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-98-

4107-L)

Submitted: April 20, 2000 Decided: May 1, 2000

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James C. Strouse, Columbia, Maryland, for Appellant. Lynne A.

Battaglia, United States Attorney, Larry D. Adams, Assistant United

States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

August 13, 1999, the district court’s record shows that it was

entered on the docket sheet on August 17, 1999. Pursuant to Rules

58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the

date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as

the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Bruce King appeals the district court’s order granting summary

judgment to Defendants in this action arising from his termination

from employment. We have reviewed the briefs, the district court’s

opinion, and the other materials before the court. Finding no reversible error, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

See King v. United States Postal Serv., No. CA-98-4107-L (D. Md.

Aug. 17, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 09-6664.

#### Liliam Amparo Restrepo-Mejia, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

559 U.S. 941, 130 S. Ct. 1502, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 1324.

176 L. Ed. 2d 117,

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 323 Fed. Appx. 338.
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Graham L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Perry, Chief Financial
Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner of
the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		August 16, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 8555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4050]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Clinical Center; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the NIH Advisory Board for Clinical Research.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.The meeting will be closed to 
the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 
552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended to discuss personnel matters, 
the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion 
of privacy.

    Name of Committee: NIH Advisory Board for Clinical Research.
    Date: March 30, 2009.
    Open: 10 a.m. to 1:15 p.m.
    Agenda: To review the Clinical Center Budget for fiscal year 
2010.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 10, 10 Center 
Drive, CRC Medical Board Room 4-2551, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Closed: 1:15 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To discuss personnel matters.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 10, 10 Center 
Drive, CRC Medical Board Room 4-2551, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Maureen E Gormley, Executive Secretary, Mark O. 
Hatfield Clinical Research Center, National Institutes of Health, 
Building 10, Room 6-2551, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/496-2897.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    In the interest of security, NIH has instituted stringent 
procedures for entrance onto the NIH campus. All visitor vehicles, 
including taxicabs, hotel, and airport shuttles will be inspected 
before being allowed on campus. Visitors will be asked to show one 
form of identification (for example, a government-issued photo ID, 
driver's license, or passport) and to state the purpose of their 
visit.

    Dated: February 19, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
 [FR Doc. E9-4050 Filed 2-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
No. 09-8873.

#### Chimdi Ibiam, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 998, 130 S. Ct. 1750,

176 L. Ed. 2d 223,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2289.

March 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 330 Fed. Appx. 295.
No. 09-8629.

#### Hui Chen, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 961, 130 S. Ct. 1564,

176 L. Ed. 2d 149,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1153.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 350 Fed. Appx. 520.