alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10.14

 

 Exhibit 10.14
 

 

 LINE OF CREDIT PROMISSORY NOTE
 

 $200,000 Date: December 1, 2010
 

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Entest Biomedical Inc. , ("Borrower") promises to pay to the order of Bio-Technology Partners Business Trust ("Lender"), a Nevada Business Trust, the principal sum of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000), or so much thereof as may be disbursed to, or for the benefit of the Borrower by Lender in Lender's sole and absolute discretion. It is the intent of the Borrower and Lender hereunder to create a line of credit agreement between Borrower and Lender whereby Borrower may borrow up to $ 200,000 from Lender. This agreement shall also be the terms and conditions of any and all borrowed amounts outstanding as of this date.
 

 INTEREST & PRINCIPAL: The unpaid principal of this line of credit shall bear simple interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum. Interest shall be calculated based on the principal balance as may be adjusted from time to time to reflect additional advances or payments made hereunder. Principal balance and accrued interest shall become due and payable in whole or in part at the demand of the Lender. 
 

 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF BORROWER
 

 Borrower  (a) is a corporation duly formed, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of Nevada  and (b) has all requisite power and authority, and has all governmental licenses, authorizations, consents and approvals necessary to execute and deliver this Agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
 

 None of the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by Borrower, or the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby (a) constitute or will constitute a violation of the organizational documents of Borrower, (b) constitutes or will constitute a breach or violation of, or a default (or an event which, with notice or lapse of time or both, would constitute such a default) under, any indenture, mortgage, deed of Borrower, loan agreement, lease or other agreement or instrument to which Borrower is a party or by which Borrower or any of its properties may be bound
 

 BORROWER: 
 

 By: /s/ David Koos
 

 Its: CEO
No. 11-7836.

#### Oscar Negrete-Enriquez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1171, 132 S. Ct. 1126,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1004,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 599.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 09-630.

#### Royal Benson, et al., Petitioners v. St. Joseph Regional Health Center, et al.

559 U.S. 937, 130 S. Ct. 1507,

176 L. Ed. 2d 111,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1344.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 575 F.3d 542.
Invento~ExperlServke A division of the American Chemical Society Phone: 800-631-1884, 614-447-3870 

Fax: 614-447-3747 

E-mail: answers@cas.org 

Web: www.cas.orgiproductslother-cas-productslcIJent-servicesl 

INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT 

IES Order Number: 

Registry Number: 

CA Index Name: 

CAS 

D 

Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN. 

If this box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order. 

Please make the same corrections to your PMN before submitting it to the EPA. 

2540 Olentangy Rivar Road P.O. Box 3343 Columbus,OH 43210-0334 USA
No. 11-6990.

#### Dwaune J. Gravley, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1070, 132 S. Ct. 788,

181 L. Ed. 2d 503,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8388.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
No. 11-568.

#### Samuel Pierce, Petitioner v. Rona Woldenberg.

565 U.S. 1148, 132 S. Ct. 1032,

181 L. Ed. 2d 791,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 477.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001067457
<NAME> ROMACORP, INC. 10-Q FOR PERIOD ENDED 9/26/1999
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-26-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,201
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,686
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,430
<PP&E>                                          58,948
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,304
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,973)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,265
<SALES>                                         53,167
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,500
<CGS>                                           17,043
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,308
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4,912)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    345
<INCOME-TAX>                                       121
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (289)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting: 

*Name:*                         Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee (#13883).                     

*Date and Time:*                         March 5, 2009, 2 p.m.-4 p.m. EDT.                     

*Place:*                         Teleconference.                     

National Science Foundation, Room 1060, Stafford I Building, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA, 22230. 

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Craig B. Foltz, Acting Division Director, Division of Astronomical Sciences, Suite 1045, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 703-292-4908.                     

*Reason for Late Notice:*                         Due to scheduling complications. At the last meeting, February 19, it was decided that another meeting via teleconference was required to review the draft annual report before the March 15 submission.                     

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations to the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) on issues within the field of astronomy and astrophysics that are of mutual interest and concern to the agencies.                     

*Agenda:*                         To discuss the Committee's draft annual report due 15 March 2009.                     

Dated: February 24, 2009. 

Susanne E. Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer.

 [FR Doc. E9-4188 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Date: 21 September 2017 **********************

NSN: 8940-01-551-6066 Regular (FSCR) *MONOGRAPH FS 3-06

 8940-01-551-6005 Mini ***********************

Item: First Strike Bars, Cran-Raspberry, Regular or Mini (Flavor III, Style A or Style B)

Document: PCR-F-001 First Strike Bars, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: Reg: 275

Mini: 150

Component 

Classification:

Reg: Primary

Mini: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Medium pink to red color with a smooth to slightly rough glossy exterior and a dense 

or slightly porous interior structure that contains small intact pieces of light tan colored 

crisped cereal grains distributed throughout.

Odor: Sweet, cranberry and raspberry.

Flavor: Sweet, cranberry and raspberry with a mild grain aftertaste.

Texture: Chewy and slightly soft with crispy pieces of cereal grain.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Excessively darkened; dry dull surface.

Odor: Stale, oxidized, soapy or rancid.

Flavor: Stale, oxidized, bitter, soapy or rancid.

Texture: Excessively hard and chewy, gritty or chalky.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

NA
No. 11-7529.

#### Radcliffe Meeks, Petitioner v. Dale Artus, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility.

565 U.S. 1181, 132 S. Ct. 1149,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1023,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1031.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001065803
<NAME>                        ORANGE PRODUCTIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Feb-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Mar-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Nov-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         12,368
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               12,368
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 12,368
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       206
<OTHER-SE>                                     8,368
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   12,368
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,377)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,377)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,377)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
No. 11-632.

#### D. Charles Dickow, Executor of the Estate of Margaret W. Dickow, Petitioner v. United States, et al.

565 U.S. 1115, 132 S. Ct. 1046,

181 L. Ed. 2d 741,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 286.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 654 F.3d 144.
No. 09-8344.

#### Maurice Oparaji, Petitioner v. The New York Mortgage Company, LLC.

559 U.S. 954, 130 S. Ct. 1545,

176 L. Ed. 2d 138,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1319.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, denied.

Same case below, 55 App. Div. 3d 429, 866 N.Y.S.2d 69.
No. 11-7347.

#### Devaughn Jherelle Hall, Petitioner v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 1163, 132 S. Ct. 1105,

181 L. Ed. 2d 989,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 802.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 429 Fed. Appx. 354.
exhibit10-9_1.htm


Exhibit 10.9.1


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT












This Amendment to the July 26, 2011 Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) between East West Bank (“Company”) and James T. Schuler (“Employee”) is entered into as of this 9th day of April, 2012 by and between Company and Employee.







The following terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement are hereby modified:







1.           Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby modified by adding at the end a paragraph (c) to read as follows:  The term of this Agreement and employment under this Agreement shall terminate (without cause) on April 8, 2015 unless this Agreement is extended by Company.







2.           Except as expressly agreed to herein, the Employment Agreement between the parties shall remain in force and effect.







EAST WEST BANK







By: _________________________












____________________________


Employee:  James T. Schuler
No. 11-7355.

#### Terry Darryl Kitchen, Jr., Petitioner v. Tom Felker, Warden.

565 U.S. 1129, 132 S. Ct. 1042,

181 L. Ed. 2d 766,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 144.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 442 Fed. Appx. 318.
#### Houde and Solinger v. Missoula Co. Justice Court

OP 16-0644

10/31/16

Granted

Original Proceeding Supervisory Control
No. 11-6729.

#### Erwin B. Patterson, Jr., Petitioner v. Towne Bank, et al.

565 U.S. 1083, 132 S. Ct. 823,

181 L. Ed. 2d 533,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8788.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 437 Fed. Appx. 258.
| (logo) WELLS

            FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

** **

Reference is herebymade to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 9, 2017, byand among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Servicer, Aegon USA Realty Advisors, LLC, as SpecialServicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee and Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator and Custodian withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2017-GM (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section10.8 of the Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.           Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.           To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/ Leslie Hayton

Leslie Hayton 

Managing Director

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
No. 11-48.

#### John E. Wetzel, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al., Petitioners v. Joseph J. Kindler.

565 U.S. 1173, 132 S. Ct. 1089,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1008,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 696.

January 17, 2012.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the

Third Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Same case below, 642 F.3d 398.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-31137

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILSON SAM,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana 

USDC No. 96-CR-60002-1

- - - - - - - - - -

August 28, 1998

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Wilson Sam appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence

for food stamp fraud, money laundering, and criminal forfeiture. 

He argues that the district court erred in refusing to grant a

downward departure due to his advanced age and poor health. 

Because the district court’s refusal to grant a downward

departure was not the result of a violation of law or a

misapplication of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, this court

lacks jurisdiction to review the district court’s refusal to 
No. 97-31137 

-2-

grant a downward departure. United States v. Guajardo, 950 F.2d

203, 207-08 (5th Cir. 1991).

Sam also argues that the district court erred in imposing

the maximum sentence within the applicable Guideline range

without considering his advanced age or poor health and without

stating reasons as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c). The district

court considered Sam’s arguments concerning his age and health

and determined that the maximum sentence within the applicable

Guideline range was appropriate. See Guajardo, 950 F.2d at 207-

08. Because the applicable guideline range spanned exactly 24

months and did not exceed 24 months, the district court was not

required to state reasons for imposing the particular sentence

under § 3553(c). See § 3553(c)(1); United States v. Richardson,

925 F.2d 112, 117 (5th Cir. 1991). However, even if the district

court was required to state reasons for imposing the particular

sentence, the district court articulated sufficient reasons in

stating that Sam’s conduct was “reprehensible and immoral in the

manner in which [he] used others in order to cover [his] tracks.” 

The district court further stated that Sam should not be allowed

to “manipulate the system” in the future.

AFFIRMED.
# C_2016344EN.01000302.xml

| 20.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/3

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2016/C 344/04)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 20.8.2016 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 20.8.2016 – 31.12.2016 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or Group of stocks | HKE/8ABDE. |
| Species | Hake (Merluccius merluccius) |
| Zone | VIIIa, VIIIb, VIIId and VIIIe |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 26/TQ72 |

Date and time of closure

20.8.2016

Duration

20.8.2016 – 31.12.2016

Member State

Belgium

Stock or Group of stocks

HKE/8ABDE.

Species

Hake (Merluccius merluccius)

Merluccius merluccius

Zone

VIIIa, VIIIb, VIIId and VIIIe

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

26/TQ72

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 10(A)



 EXHIBIT 10(a) 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of Additional
Information and to the use of our reports: (1) dated April 11, 2012, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company, and (2) dated April 13, 2012, with respect to the financial
statements of the subaccounts of Separate Account VA BNY, included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 36 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 33-83560) under the Securities Act of 1933 and related Prospectus of Transamerica Landmark NY Variable
Annuity. 
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
 Des Moines, Iowa 
 April 13, 2012
GERALD MIGNANO 

Is posthumously inducted into the Defense Industrial Supply Center Hall of Fame this twelfth day 

of December 1997 for his extraordinary leadership and support as Supervisory Cost/Price Analyst 

in the Directorate of Contracting and Production and for his continuous outstanding mission 

support throughout his tenure at DISC from 1971 to 1989. Mr. Mignano formed the DISC Cost and 

Pricing Office. This was done to establish an accounting office devoted to the review of all high 

dollar contractor proposals. Due to his accounting and cost estimating efforts, contracting officers 

were able to save millions of dollars during contract negotiations. He was also an integral part of 

the formation of the Competition Advocate Office, and introduced sound accounting and cost 

principles to buyers and contracting officers working at the Center. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/mignano.htm 1/27/2016