alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT UNDER SECTION 302 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Ryan J.Watts, Ph.D., certify that: 

 
1.I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Denali Therapeutics Inc.; 
 
2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
 
3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
 
4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 
 
(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 
 
(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 
 
(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 
 
5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 
 
(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 
 
(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 
Date: March 19, 2018 

 
  /s/ Ryan J. Watts 
 
  Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D.   President and Chief Executive Officer **
No. 11-7532.

#### In re Steven Floyd Bourn, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 1177, 132 S. Ct. 1149,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1026.

181 L. Ed. 2d 1032,

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          24,037
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,037
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,637
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,936
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       279,769
<OTHER-SE>                                    (263,068)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,637
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,218
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (28,218)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (28,218)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (28,218)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)



</TABLE>
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: 14-AD-39-AD 

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DJSCUSSED 

Airlines for America Ireland 9/ 16/2015 e-mail advising him that 

FAA is planning to issue 

AD 

Other/ Additional Information:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Thomas P. Friezen, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dakota Growers PastaCompany, Inc.;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  June 14, 2005 |                    |   |
|---------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                      | /s/ Thomas P. Friezen   |   |
|                      |                    |
|                      | Thomas P. Friezen       |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer |
|                           |                         |        |  |

 

1

----
REPORT OF INSPECTION ON _____________ OPERATIONAL RATIONS (CONT) 

 (USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECCESSARY) PAGE ___ OF ___

PART VII – NONCONFORMANCE SUMMARY d

DEFECT TALLY*

Primary Secondary Ancillary N

/

A

ASSEMBLER 

LOT NO.

MENU 

NO.

COMPONENT

& 

CODE

COMPONENT 

PROCESSOR

DEFECT

TABLE

DEFECT

NO.

DEFECT 

CODE

DESCRIPTION

OF DEFECTS/REMARKS

A B M A B M A B M

* A = MAJ A, B = MAJ B, M = MINOR, N/A = Items with no Component Classification (Primary, Secondary, Ancillary)

DEFECT TOTALS

PART VIII - NARRATIVE COMMENTS

PART IX – SIGNATURE BLOCK

NAME / SIGNATURE OF INSPECTOR DATE NAME / SIGNATURE OF SUPERVISOR TELEPHONE NO. DATE

DSCP FORM 5117 (BACK), JULY 2001 (FOR USE OF THIS FORM, SEE DSCPH 4155.2, APPROPRIATE APPENDIX)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         1067700
<NAME>                        R.A.B. ENTERPRISES, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              1,662
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      47,318
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (4,489)
<INVENTORY>                                        74,682
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  127,190
<PP&E>                                             54,862
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (17,826)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    295,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              80,976
<BONDS>                                            80,340
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                         39,691
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      295,001
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  311,980
<CGS>                                             236,835
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      75,128
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  311,963
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  8,133
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (8,116)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (2,922)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (5,194)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     3,194
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (2,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0



</TABLE>
28 September 2007 ************************* 

NSN: 8955-01-484-9676 * MONOGRAPH NO: 6B 4 

 ************************* 

Item: Drink Mixes, Coffee Flavored, instant, Cappuccino, Regular, French Vanilla (Type V, 

Style A, Flavor 1) (CFV) 

Document: CID A-A-20336, Drink Mixes, Coffee (Unflavored and Flavored) and PKG&QAP 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 120 Component Classification: Secondary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F 

Item Characteristics

Appearance: 

Dehydrated product: Off-white or dark brown combination. 

Rehydrated product: a medium golden brown color with a layer of milky white froth on 

top. 

Odor: 

Dehydrated product: Characteristic of French Vanilla instant cappuccino. 

Rehydrated product: Strong, sweetened coffee with cream characteristic of French 

Vanilla. 

Flavor: Rehydrated product: A strong sweetened coffee with cream flavor characteristic of 

French Vanilla. 

Texture: 

Dehydrated product: Free flowing and fine grained. Lumps that occur can be broken 

apart with light finger pressure. 

Rehydrated product: smooth, free of discernible lumps, and sediment free. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: 

Dehydrated product: Lumpy or caked, not free flowing. Not uniformly blended. Not off 

white or not a dark brown combination. 

Rehydrated product: May not reconstitute instantly, sedimentation, undissolved 

particles. 

Odor: Off odors, such as, strong non-fat dry milk odor, rancid aroma. 

Flavor: Rehydrated product: Flavor not typical of French Vanilla coffee flavor. Off flavors, 

such as, strong non-fat dry milk flavor, rancid. 

Texture: 

Dehydrated product: Not free flowing. Lumps that occur can not be broken apart with 

light finger pressure. 

Rehydrated product: Not sediment free. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Initial examination should be done in the dry state; final examination and evaluation should be done 

after rehydrating IAW package instructions. After adding water gentle stirring is permitted. 

Special Notes Dry product may contain lumps, which are of no concern provided they break or fall 

apart under light finger pressure.
No. 11-5628.

#### Rosendo Rodriguez, Petitioner v. Texas.

565 U.S. 1080, 132 S. Ct. 814,

181 L. Ed. 2d 528,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8827.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 150 (Wednesday, August 5, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 41765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20818]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 98-135, RM-9300]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Lufkin, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition filed by Russell 
L. Lindley, proposing the allotment of Channel 261A to Lufkin, Texas. 
The channel can be allotted to Lufkin at coordinates 31-16-13 and 94-
43-50. There is a site restriction 8.5 kilometers (5.3 miles) south of 
the community.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before September 21, 1998, and 
reply comments on or before October 6, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC. 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner's counsel, as follows: Howard J. Barr, Patricia M. 
Chuh, Lee G. Petro, Pepper & Corazzini, L.L.P., 1176 K Street, N.W., 
Suite 200, Washington, DC 20006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice 
of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 98-135, adopted July 22, 1998, 
and released July 31, 1998. The full text of this Commission decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-3805.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contact.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 98-20818 Filed 8-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
No. 11-6479.

#### Nyron Joel Nichols, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1174, 132 S. Ct. 1093,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1009,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 615.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 429 Fed. Appx. 355.
Exhibit 10.14


 


Summary of Unwritten Employment Arrangements
with Executive Officers


 


Each executive officer of Sigma Labs, Inc.,
a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), has entered into an "at will" unwritten employment arrangement with the
Company.


 


Under the respective employment arrangement
of Richard Mah and James Stout, the Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer of the Company, respectively, from October 11, 2010 until
December 31, 2011, each were entitled to receive a monthly salary of $2,461. As a cost saving measure, on December 15, 2011, Messrs.
Mah and Stout agreed with the Company to reduce their respective salary to $0, effective January 1, 2012. Actual amounts paid to
Messrs. Mah and Stout are as set forth in the "Summary Compensation Table" under Item 11 of the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the "Table").


 


Under the respective employment arrangement
of Mark J. Cola and Vivek R. Dave, President and Chief Operating Officer, and Executive Vice President of the Company, respectively,
Mr. Cola was entitled to receive a monthly salary of $11,856 in 2010, commencing on April 17, 2010, and in 2011, and Dr. Dave was
entitled to receive a monthly salary of $12,029 in 2010, commencing on April 17, 2010, and in 2011. As a cost saving measure, (i)
on December 15, 2011, Messrs. Cola and Dave agreed with the Company to reduce their salary to $9,484.80 and $9,623.20, respectively,
per month, effective January 1, 2012, and (ii) on March 1, 2012, Messrs. Cola and Dave agreed with the Company to further reduce
their respective salary to $6,000 per month each, effective retroactively to February 16, 2012. Actual amounts paid to Messrs.
Cola and Dave are as set forth in the Table.


 


Under their respective employment arrangements,
all executive officers are eligible to receive medical and dental benefits, life insurance, and long term and short term disability
coverage. Further, Messrs. Mah, Stout, Cola and Dave are eligible to participate in the Company's 2011 Equity Incentive Plan as
employees and directors of the Company. The Company has not agreed to pay bonuses to any executive officer.
No. 09-8132.

#### Gerald Wayne Graves, Petitioner v. Texas.

559 U.S. 975, 130 S. Ct. 1692,

176 L. Ed. 2d 187,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2066.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, denied.
Amendment #1 to Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Michael



 Exhibit 10.4 
 AMENDMENT #1 
 TO 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 BY AND BETWEEN 
 MICHAEL D. HEIL 

AND 

IGO, INC. 
 This Amendment
#1 to Employment Agreement (“Amendment #1”) is made effective as of April 10, 2012, by and between Michael D. Heil (“Employee”) and iGo, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Employer”). 

RECITALS 
  

	A.	On May 1, 2007, Employee and Employer entered into that certain Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”); and 


 

	B.	Employee and Employer wish to amend the Agreement in accordance with this Amendment #1. 

 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the terms and conditions of this Amendment #1, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, Employee and Employer, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Amendment to Agreement. Notwithstanding anything in the Agreement to the contrary, effective as of April 10, 2012, Employee’s base annual salary
shall be equal to $333,000 per year. 

  

	 	2.	Ratification. All terms and conditions of the Agreement are reaffirmed, except where such terms and conditions would conflict with the provisions of this
Amendment #1. In such instances, the provisions of this Amendment #1 supersede and replace the conflicting terms and conditions of the Agreement. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment #1, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect
in accordance with its provisions. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Representative and iGo have executed this Amendment #1 to be effective
as of the date first set forth above. 
  

											
	iGo, Inc.	 		 		 	
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Brian M. Roberts
	 		 	By:	 	     /s/ Michael D. Heil

	Name:	 	Brian M. Roberts	 		 	Michael D. Heil
	Title:	 	Vice President
H. R. 4841

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and six 

An Act 

To amend the Ojito Wilderness Act to make a technical correction.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. OJITO WILDERNESS MAP. 

Section 2(1) of the Ojito Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1132 note; 

Public Law 109–94) is amended by striking ‘‘October 1, 2004’’ and 

inserting ‘‘January 24, 2006’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
No. 11-6931.

#### Douglas E. Kampfer, Petitioner v. John H. Buchanan, et al.

565 U.S. 1069, 132 S. Ct. 784,

181 L. Ed. 2d 502,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8571.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# C_2016417EN.01000403.xml

| 11.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 417/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 417/4

---

EUROPEAN BANKING AUTHORITY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2015

(2016/C 417/14)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.eba.europa.eu/about-us/budget-and-accounts

---
No. 09-720.

#### Ora Myrtle Ransford, et al., Petitioners v. Griffin Wheel Company, Inc.

559 U.S. 971, 130 S. Ct. 1691,

176 L. Ed. 2d 181,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2095.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, denied.