alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
18 September 2009 *************************** 

NSN: 8925 01 578 90949094 * MONOGRAPH NO: M10V1*

 ***************************

Item: Granola, with Milk and Bananas (Type II)

Document: PCR-G-003, Granola, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 260 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Dry product: Mixture of rolled oats, nonfat dry milk and freeze-dried banana pieces.

Rehydrated product: Mixture of distinct oat flakes, off white to pale yellow banana

pieces, and milky liquid.

Odor: Dry product: Coconut, toasted grain, sweet, dairy.

Rehydrated product: Coconut, toasted grain, sweet, dairy, mild banana.

Flavor: Dry product: Coconut, toasted grain, sweet, dairy, and mild banana.

Rehydrated product: Coconut, toasted grain, sweet, dairy, mild banana.

Texture:

Dry product: Free flowing mixture of powder, oat flakes, and distinct banana pieces.

Rehydrated product: Chewy and firm with fibrous coconut and soft, moist banana

pieces in a liquid with a creamy milk mouthfeel.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Dry product: Not free flowing, caked or lumped, darkened banana pieces.

Rehydrated product: Darkened color of milky liquid.

Odor: Dry product: Rancid, soapy, scorched, burnt, sour dairy.

Rehydrated product: Rancid, soapy, scorched, burnt, sour dairy.

Flavor: Dry product: Rancid, soapy, scorched, burnt, sour dairy.

Rehydrated product: Rancid, soapy, scorched, burnt, sour dairy.

Texture: Dry product: Not free flowing, caked or lumped.

Rehydrated product: Gummy cereal, stringy liquid, hard banana pieces.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Initially examine in dry state for appearance and texture; then examine IAW rehydration directions on 

package.

Special Notes

When rehydrated per instructions the product shall have some free liquid and an even distribution of 

moisture throughout the grain and bananas. Lumps that break apart under light pressure are no concern. 
18 September 2009 *************************** 

NSN: 8925 01 578 90949094 * MONOGRAPH NO: M10V1*

 ***************************

This product should contain an oxygen scavenger packet. If defects such as oxidized or rancid odors or 

flavors exist, they are likely due to package failure or the absence of an oxygen scavenger.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4740 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4740

 To extend the termination date for the exemption of returning workers 
         from the numerical limitations for temporary workers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2006

  Mr. Bass (for himself, Mr. Gilchrest, Mr. Delahunt, Mr. Ortiz, Mr. 
 Cardin, Mr. Flake, Ms. Herseth, Mr. Moran of Kansas, Mr. Stupak, Mr. 
  Wynn, Ms. Bordallo, Mr. Simmons, Mr. Olver, Mr. Ryun of Kansas, Mr. 
 Pomeroy, Mr. Bradley of New Hampshire, Mr. Boustany, Mr. Van Hollen, 
 Mr. Melancon, Mr. Jones of North Carolina, Mr. Kind, Mr. Cannon, Mr. 
 Ryan of Wisconsin, Mr. Larson of Connecticut, Mr. Capuano, Mr. Baker, 
 Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Kennedy of Minnesota, Mr. Allen, Mr. Ruppersberger, 
  Mr. Moore of Kansas, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. Sweeney, Mr. 
  Bishop of New York, and Mr. Michaud) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the termination date for the exemption of returning workers 
         from the numerical limitations for temporary workers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Save Our Small and Seasonal 
Businesses Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF RETURNING WORKER EXEMPTION.

    Section 402(b)(1) of the Save Our Small and Seasonal Businesses Act 
of 2005 (8 U.S.C. 1184 note; Public Law 109-13) is amended by striking 
``2006'' and inserting ``2009''.
                                 <all>
```
Montana Thirteenth Judicial District Court. County of Yellowstone.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- LANEA LYNN SELAGE, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-15-633

DECISION

On November 13, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced the Department of Corrections for a commitment of three (3) years, for the offense of Count I: Escape, a Felony. This sentence was ordered to run consecutive to DC-11-0734.

On April 8, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Peter Ohman, of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

*32Done in open Court this 8th day of April, 2016.

DATED this 3rd day of May, 2016.

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member and Hon. Brad Newman, Member.
No. 09-8300.

#### Richard Orlando McCray, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 953, 130 S. Ct. 1541,

176 L. Ed. 2d 136,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1122.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 345 Fed. Appx. 498.
No. 11-150.

#### Marteen Moore, Petitioner v. USC University Hospital, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1079,

181 L. Ed. 2d 796,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 555.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

*797Former decision, 565 U.S. 884, 132 S. Ct. 254, 181 L. Ed. 2d 147, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5257.
IF ALREADY A PIEE USER
IF A NEW PIEE USER

This is a full drop down menu of 

all 30 PIEE applications; the 

applicant will select “FEDMALL”
Exhibit 31.2





Certification of Chief Financial Officer


of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)





I, Ross A. Teune, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:





1) I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Golub Capital BDC 3, Inc.;





2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:





a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.











Date: December 7, 2018








/s/ Ross A. Teune


Ross A. Teune


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") by R.A.B. Holdings, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("Holdings"), and R.A.B. Enterprises, Inc., a Delaware corporation
("Enterprises" and, together with Holdings, the "Registrant"), each of the
undersigned hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and
         cash flows of the Registrant for the quarter ended June 30, 2003.



                                                       R.A.B. HOLDINGS, INC.



August 14, 2003                                        /s/ Richard A. Bernstein
                                                       ------------------------
                                                       Richard A. Bernstein
                                                       Chairman




                                                       R.A.B. ENTERPRISES, INC.



August 14, 2003                                        /s/ Richard A. Bernstein
                                                       ------------------------
                                                       Richard A. Bernstein
                                                       Chairman




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant, and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**UNITED STA TES ENVIRONMENTA**  **L PROTECTION A GENCY**  NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 - 2498
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Runspecs, Model Inputs, MOVES Code and Database for HD GHG Phase 2 NPRM

Emissions Modeling FROM: David Choi

Assessment and Standards Division Office of Transportation and Air Qualit y TO: Docket : EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 201 4
- 0827 DATE: May

27, 2015 The purpose of this memorandum is to transmit to the docket a DVD containing the runspecs, model inputs, MOVES code and database, and related files for HD GHG Phase 2 NPRM e missions m odeling
. The disk contains six folders. Table 1 lists the contents of each folder. **Table 1. Contents of Folders included in the DVD**  **File or Folder**  **Description** MOVES20140731 MOVES code MOVESDB20140731_HDGHG2 MOVES default database Runspecs MOVES runspec files for each vehicle classes and alternatives ModelI nputFiles Details of the analy ses used to generate MOVES input files for vocational and tractor/trailers InputDB The user
- input databases specified in the runspecs, based on the model input files Scripts The py thon scripts used to convert the model input files to the MOVES
- compatible input databases
No. 11-7292.

#### Yonel Jean Baptiste, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1099, 132 S. Ct. 862,

181 L. Ed. 2d 561,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8978.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

*562Same case below, 436 Fed. Appx. 964.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First National Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, F. I.
duPont, III, Chairman & CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 11, 2003

/s/ F. I. duPont, III
---------------------------------------
F. I. duPont, III, Chairman & CEO
**Exhibit
      32**





**Certification
      by the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
      18 U.
      S. C. Section 1350, as**


**Adopted
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**





Pursuant
      to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, Barbara Duncan, hereby certify that, to the
      best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DOV
      Pharmaceutical, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in
      the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of DOV Pharmaceutical, Inc.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      DOV and will be retained by DOV and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/ Barbara
              DuncanBarbara Duncan
              Chief
                  Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
                May
                  15, 2007




This
      certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
      extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such
      certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
      under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act,
      except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
      reference.
No. 11-6995.

#### Curtis M. John-Charles, Petitioner v. California.

565 U.S. 1097, 132 S. Ct. 855,

181 L. Ed. 2d 557,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8845.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 646 F.3d 1243.
5 April 2012 *************************

NSN: 8955-01-304-3619 *MONOGRAPH NO: M9B *

*************************

Item: Coffee, Instant, Freeze dried, Regular, (Type III, Style A) (FDI)

Document: CID A-A-20184 Coffee, Instant and PKG & QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 5 Component Classification: ANCILLARY

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Dry Product: freeze dried coffee with granular appearance.

Hydrated Product: typical brownish black coffee color; smooth, free from discernible 

lumps and sediment free, and fully dissolves in hot or cold water with constant stirring

and showing no evidence of undissolved floating particles.

Odor:

Dry Product: NA

Hydrated Product: characteristic coffee.

Flavor:

Dry Product: NA

Hydrated Product: characteristic coffee.

Texture:

Dry Product: fine grained, free flowing, and free from lumps that do not compress with 

light pressure.

Hydrated Product: NA

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance:

Dry Product: clumped, caked, hardened, very dark brown to black, white specs or fiber 

like particles (leached caffeine).

Hydrated Product: undissolved particles, heavy sediment, heavy oily film; very dark 

brown to black liquid.

Odor: Dry or Hydrated Product: burnt, strong nut, stale coffee.

Flavor: Dry or Hydrated Product: burnt, nutty, stale coffee that is excessively bitter; rancid 

oil.

Texture: Dry Product: clumpy, caked, and hardened.

Hydrated Product: astringent, particles may not dissolve.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Initially product should be observed in the dry state. Follow with hydrated product examination. Hydrate 

per label instructions. Recommend glass or ceramic cups. Do not use plastic, Styrofoam or similar cups.

Special Notes

NA
Provisional 11/16

NSN:

************************

* MONOGRAPH NO: 

M5OP

************************

Item: Cranberries, Sliced, Plain, Not fortified, No Sulfur Dioxide (Type VII, Style B, Flavor

1, Fortification a, Class(1)) (CSN)

Document: A-A-20299 Fruits, Infused and Dried and PKG & QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 150 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F 

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Red to dark red small slices of dried cranberries.

Odor: Mild fruit, slightly caramelized characteristic of cranberries.

Flavor: Mild, slightly tart characteristic of cranberries.

Texture: Soft and chewy.

Possible Deteriorative Changes

Appearance: Darkened or discolored, excessively clumped.

Odor: Loss of fruity character, musty fermented, caramelized. 

Flavor: Loss of fruity character, musty fermented, caramelized.

Texture: Extreme chewiness or stickiness.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes
Provisional 11/16

NSN:

************************

* MONOGRAPH NO: 

M5OP

************************

The dried cranberries are normally sprayed lightly with vegetable oil to prevent clumping. Some slight 

oiliness or greasiness may be evident on the surface.
No. 11-6911.

#### Darryl Buck, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1044, 132 S. Ct. 599,

181 L. Ed. 2d 439,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8270,

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 437 Fed. Appx. 202.
No. 09-8068.

#### Tony L. Gary, Petitioner v. Florida.

559 U.S. 949, 130 S. Ct. 1530,

176 L. Ed. 2d 129,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1250.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.

Same case below, 5 So. 3d 713.
ITEM: Coffee, Roasted, Ground, ************************

drip or univ. grind, 13 oz container * MONOGRAPH: 7B4

(CRG) Ancillary ************************

NSN: 8955-01-394-8339 ITEM SPECIFICATION: COMMERCIAL

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Typical of good commercial coffee, very dark brown.

ODOR: Roasted coffee beans.

FLAVOR: Typical of good commercial coffee; slightly to moderately bitter.

TEXTURE: Smooth fluid, little to no sediment.

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36 months 

 100 DEGREES F: 6 months

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

APPEARANCE: None.

ODOR: Excessively strong coffee, stale coffee.

FLAVOR: Excessively bitter, stale, rancid oil, excessively strong coffee flavor.

TEXTURE: None.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None.
No. 09-780.

#### Kenneth M. Pedeleose, Petitioner v. Department of Defense.

559 U.S. 940, 130 S. Ct. 1544,

176 L. Ed. 2d 116,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1142.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 343 Fed. Appx. 605.
No. 11-7318.

#### George M. Lecco, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1100, 132 S. Ct. 863,

181 L. Ed. 2d 562,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 9011.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 187.
# C_2016064EN.01000101.xml

| 19.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/1

---

Communication from the Commission establishing formal recognition that a certain number of acts of Union law in the field of agriculture have become obsolete

(2016/C 64/01)

List of acts to be removed from the active acquis

List of acts to be removed from the active acquis

Dried fodder

Dried fodder

Commission Regulation (EC) No 382/2005

(OJ L 61, 8.3.2005, p. 4).

Hemp and seed

Hemp and seed

Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2514/78

(OJ L 301, 28.10.1978, p. 10).

Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3164/89

(OJ L 307, 24.10.1989, p. 22).

Hops

Hops

Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3889/87

(OJ L 365, 24.12.1987, p. 41).

Olive oil

Olive oil

Commission Regulation (EC) No 528/1999

(OJ L 62, 11.3.1999, p. 8).

Silkworm

Silkworm

Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1496/77

(OJ L 167, 5.7.1977, p. 8).

Sugar

Sugar

Regulation (EEC) No 100/72 of the Commission

(OJ L 12, 15.1.1972, p. 15).

Commission Regulation (EEC) No 189/77

(OJ L 25, 29.1.1977, p. 27).

---
No. 11-5915.

#### Willie Rabb, Petitioner v. Georgia Pacific, LLC, et al.

565 U.S. 1174, 132 S. Ct. 1138,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1011,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 639.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 966, 132 S. Ct. 461, 181 L. Ed. 2d 300, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7462.