alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4328]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Docket No. AB-6 (Sub-No. 466X)]


BNSF Railway Company--Discontinuance of Trackage Rights 
Exemption--in Kootenai County, ID

    On February 12, 2009, BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) filed with the 
Surface Transportation Board (Board) a petition under U.S.C. 10502 for 
exemption from the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 10903 to discontinue 
trackage rights over approximately 1.39 miles of rail line owned by 
Union Pacific Railroad Company, between milepost 7.40 at Gibb and 
milepost 8.79 at Coeur d'Alene, in Kootenai County, ID. The line 
traverses U.S. Postal Service Zip Code 83814.
    The interest of railroad employees will be protected by the 
conditions set forth in Oregon Short Line R. Co.--Abandonment--Goshen, 
360 I.C.C. 91 (1979).
    By issuance of this notice, the Board is instituting an exemption 
proceeding pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10502(b). A final decision will be 
issued by June 2, 2009.
    Because this is a discontinuance proceeding and not an abandonment, 
trail use/rail banking and public use conditions are not appropriate. 
Similarly, no environmental or historic documentation is required under 
49 CFR 1105.6(c)(2) and 1105.8(b).
    Any offer of financial assistance (OFA) for subsidy under 49 CFR 
1152.27(b)(2) will be due no later than 10 days after service of a 
decision granting the petition for exemption. Each OFA must be 
accompanied by the filing fee, which is currently set at $1,500. See 49 
CFR 1002.2(f)(25).
    All filings in response to this notice must refer to STB Docket No. 
AB-6 (Sub-No. 466X) and must be sent to: (1) Surface Transportation 
Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001; and (2) Karl 
Morell, 1455 F Street, NW., Suite 225, Washington, DC 20005. Replies to 
the petition are due on or before March 24, 2009.
    Persons seeking further information concerning discontinuance 
procedures may contact the Board's Office of Congressional and Public 
Services at (202) 245-0238 or refer to the full abandonment and 
discontinuance regulations at 49 CFR part 1152. Questions concerning 
environmental issues may be directed to the Board's Section of 
Environmental Analysis (SEA) at (202) 245-0305. [Assistance for the 
hearing impaired is available through the Federal Information Relay 
Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339.]
    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at http://www.stb.dot.gov.

    Decided: February 24, 2009.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Kulunie L. Cannon,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9-4328 Filed 3-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
10 October 2008 ************************** 

NSN: 8920-01-556-9408 * MOMOGRAPH NO. M4Z5 

 **************************

Item: Cookies, Regular, Sugar, Patriotic (Type I, Class 1, Style D, Bake Type a, Shape b) 

Document: CID A-A-20295, Cookies and PKG&QAP (PAT) 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 240 Component Classification: Primary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80F 

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Intact cookie has a uniform pale gold to tan color. 

Odor: Sweet buttery with a mild vanilla odor. 

Flavor: Sweet buttery with a mild vanilla flavor. 

Texture: Crisp and tender. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkening of crumb; crushed, broken. 

Odor: Rancid, oxidized, off odor. 

Flavor: Rancid, oxidized, soapy, off flavor. 

Texture: Increased crispness, dry, hard. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Special Notes: Serviceability of the product is considered significantly affected when more than 50 

percent of the product is crushed or broken.
exhibit10-5.htm


Exhibit 10.5


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT












This Amendment to the September 17, 1999 Employment Agreement (as amended from time to time, the “Employment Agreement”) between East West Bancorp, Inc. (“Company”) and Douglas Krause (“Employee”) is entered into as of this 9th day of April, 2012 by and between Company and Employee.







The following terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement are hereby modified:







1.           Section 3.1 (Term) of the Agreement is hereby modified in its entirety to read as follows:  This Agreement and employment under this Agreement shall terminate on April 8, 2015 unless extended by Company.







2.           Except as expressly agreed to herein, the Employment Agreement between the parties shall remain in force and effect.







EAST WEST BANCORP, INC.







By: _________________________












____________________________


Employee:  Doug Krause
Doing Business with DLA Distribution and DLA Disposition Services

Email this event to me @

Invalid Email Address!Invalid Email Address!

Start Date/Time:

Wednesday, May 8, 2024 1:30 PM

End Date/Time:

Wednesday, May 8, 2024 2:30 PM

Recurring Event:

One time event

Importance:

Normal Priority

Category:

Presentation

Location:

Virtual/Online

Description:

DLA Distribution is the leading provider of global distribution support to America’s military and other federal agencies, and it comprises of more than 10,000 military and civilian employees. Located in eight countries and 20 states and territories, it delivers best-value supply chain solutions including receiving, storing and issuing supplies to increase warfighter readiness.

DLA Distribution Procures:

### Services

                        - Storage, Distribution, Warehousing, MHE Maintenance, and Janitorial 
                        - Maintenance, Repair or Alteration of Real Property (Facility Repair & Minor Construction)
                        - Automated Data Processing & Telecommunications IT 
                        - Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Maintenance Equipment 
                        - Professional, Administrative, and Management Support 

### Supplies

                        - Materials Handling Equipment (MHE) 
                        - Containers, Packaging, and Packing Supplies (Boxes) 
                        - Furniture 
                        - Office Supplies & Devices 
                        - Electric Wire, and Electrical Power & Distribution Equipment 

DLA Disposition Services disposes of excess property received from the military services. The inventory changes daily and includes thousands of items: from air conditioners to vehicles, clothing to computers, and much more. That property is first offered for reutilization within the Department of Defense (DoD), transfer to other federal agencies, or donation to state and local governments and other qualified organizations.

DLA Disposition Services procures:

### Services

                        - Hazardous Waste Treatment/Storage & Disposal 
                        - Technical Representative Services 
                        - Maintenance, Repair & Rebuilding of Materials Handling Equipment 
                        - Warehousing/Storage – Excess Property Management 
                        - Housekeeping – Landscaping/Grounds, Custodial, Trash & Other 

### Supplies

                        - Materials Handling Equipment (MHE) 
                        - Warehouse Trucks & Tractors 
                        - Special Industry Machinery - Miscellaneous 
                        - Precious Metals Primary Forms 
                        - Office Furniture 

Registration is required in advance to attend:

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJIsd-GpqTosHnAsBVbXdeqAggQFAJzAFpo

Enrolled Users:

Alandra Jones

                - Return
                - 
                - Export
No. 11-601.

#### Isaac Woods and Regina Woods, Petitioners v. United States.

565 U.S. 1114, 132 S. Ct. 1044,

181 L. Ed. 2d 740,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 246.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 413 Fed. Appx. 664.
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50429

Summary Calendar

 

GLEN C. JAMES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-96-CV-325

 

September 12, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Glen C. James, Texas inmate #660410, appeals the dismissal as

frivolous of his civil rights complaint. James does not challenge

the denial of his request for a preliminary injunction or the

imposition of court costs. Therefore, these issues are abandoned

on appeal. See Eason v. Thaler, 14 F.3d 8, 9 n.1 (5th Cir. 1994).

James argues that the district court abused its discretion by

dismissing the complaint because he has the constitutional right to

receive information and ideas through the medium of free
2

television. Our review of the record and James’ argument detects

no abuse of discretion by the district court. See Denton v.

Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 31 (1992). James’ sparse allegations do

not implicate the denial of a constitutional right. See Mann v.

Smith, 796 F.2d 79, 82-83 (5th Cir. 1986); Montana v. Commissioners

Court, 659 F.2d 19, 23 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981), cert. denied, 455

U.S. 1026 (1982).

James’ remaining argument, that the magistrate judge and

district court were biased against him through their rulings, is

without merit. See Liteky v. United States, 114 S. Ct. 1147, 1155

(1994).

This appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. See

5th Cir. R. 42.2. The appeal is DISMISSED. This opinion does not

lessen the sanction imposed upon James in James v. Scott, No. 96-

50406 (5th Cir. 1996).

DISMISSED.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?

COM\_2016\_0606\_FIN.ENG.xhtml.1\_EN\_ACT\_part1\_v4.docx


![european flag](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/image/eclogo.jpg)EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Brussels, 14.9.2016

COM(2016) 606 final

Proposal for a

amendment of the Interinstitutional Agreement

of 2 December 2013 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Whereas:

(1)A new special instrument establishing a European Union Crisis Reserve financed from decommitted appropriations is provided for in Article 13a of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the the mutliannual financial framework for years 2014 -2020
[1](#footnote1)
 in order to allow the Union to react rapidly to crises, as well as to events with serious humanitarian or security implications.

(2)The procedure for mobilising the European Union Crisis Reserve needs to be provided for in the Interinstitutional agreement on budgetary discipline, cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management,

HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

A new point 14a is introduced in part I, section B:

" European Union Crisis Reserve

14a
   When the Commission considers that the Reserve needs to be called on, it shall present to the two arms of the budgetary authority a proposal for a transfer from the Reserve to the corresponding budgetary lines.

Any Commission proposal for a transfer to draw on the Reserve, however, shall be preceded by an examination of the scope for reallocating appropriations.

In the event of disagreement a trilogue procedure shall be initiated.

The transfers from the Reserve shall be made in accordance with the Financial Regulation."

Done at Brussels,

For the European Parliament
   For the Council
   For the Commission

The President
   The President
   The President

: [(1)](#footnoteref1)
   OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 884.
No. 11-7092.

#### Sean Patrick O’Geary, Petitioner v. John Fayram, Warden.

565 U.S. 1123, 132 S. Ct. 1026,

181 L. Ed. 2d 756,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 251.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4286-4287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-2092]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


President's Advisory Board on Race; Meetings

ACTION: President's Advisory Board on Race and related meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The President's Advisory Board on Race will meet on February 
10 and 11, 1998 in the San Francisco Bay area. On February 10, Advisory 
Board members will visit sites in the area where organizations are 
having success at addressing issues relating to poverty and race. At 
approximately 6:00 p.m., there will be a community forum in San Jose at 
a site to be determined. The purpose of the forum is to provide an 
opportunity for residents from the community to raise issues of general 
concern in the areas of race and racial reconciliation.
    On February 11, the Advisory Board will meet in San Jose at a site 
to be determined to discuss issues relating to race and poverty. The 
meeting will include panel discussions with national experts, as well 
as individuals with local and regional expertise. The meeting will 
include time for questions from the public.
    The public is welcome to attend the community forum and the 
Advisory Board meeting on a first-come, first-seated basis. Members of 
the public may also submit to the contact person, any time before or 
after the meeting, written statements to the Board. Written comments 
may be submitted by mail, telegram, facsimile, or electronic mail, and 
should contain the writer's name, address and commercial, government, 
or organizational affiliation, if any. The address of the President's 
Initiative on Race is 750 17th Street, NW., Washington, D.C. 20503. The 
electronic mail address is http://www.whitehouse/gov/Initiatives/
OneAmerica.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Contact our main office number, (202) 395-
1010, for the exact time and location of the meetings. Other comments 
or questions regarding this meeting may be directed to Randy D. Ayers, 
(202) 395-1010, or via facsimile, (202) 395-1020.


[[Page 4287]]


    Dated: January 23, 1998.
Randy Ayers,
Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-2092 Filed 1-23-98; 3:22 pm]
BILLING CODE 4410-AR-M
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DAVID A. CANADY, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1088 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed September 26, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Barbara Twine Thomas, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Carbajal v. State, 75 So. 3d 258 (Fla. 2011); State v. King, 426 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 1982); McDonald v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); McKenzie v. State, 31 So. 3d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Desmond v. State, 576 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Budd v. State, 477 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); McMillan v. State, 832 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Hart v. State, 761 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

SILBERMAN, BADALAMENTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
22 April 2014 ************************

NSN: 8915-01-010-1471 (GJI) * MONOGRAPH NO: BJ2

 ************************

Item: Grape juice, Instant

Document: PCR-J-002, Juice, Fruit, Instant

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 60 Component Classification: Ancillary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Powder: Uniform, free flowing, dry mixture, purple color.

Rehydrated: Purple color.

Odor: Powder: Typical of grape powder.

Rehydrated: Sweetened grape.

Flavor: Powder: Typical of grape powder.

Rehydrated: Sweetened grape.

Texture: Powder: Free of hard lumps.

Rehydrated: No discernible lumps and sediment free.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Powder: Not free flowing dry mixture, diminished purple color.

Rehydrated: Loss of Purple color.

Odor: Powder: Diminished grape, burnt or scorched.

Rehydrated: Diminished grape.

Flavor:

Powder: Diminished grape flavor, burnt or scorched.

Rehydrated: Diminished grape flavor, bitterness may develop. Burnt or scorched 

flavor.

Texture: Powder: Not free of hard lumps.

Rehydrated: Lumps and sediment.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Initial examination should be in granular, dehydrated form. Final examination should be performed 

after reconstitution per package instructions.

Special Notes

NA
# C_2016484EN.01002201.xml

| 24.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 484/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 484/22

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position given at its meeting of 15 October 2015 regarding a draft decision relating to Case AT.39639(2) — Optical Disk Drives

Rapporteur: Austria

(2016/C 484/08)

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amounts of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amounts of the fines.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the determination of the duration for the purpose of calculating the fines. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the determination of the duration for the purpose of calculating the fines.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the specific increases of the basic amounts of the fines so as to ensure a sufficiently deterrent effect. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the specific increases of the basic amounts of the fines so as to ensure a sufficiently deterrent effect.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that there are no aggravating circumstances in this case. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that there are no aggravating circumstances in this case.

| 6. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the application of mitigating circumstances in this case.
  A minority disagree. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the application of mitigating circumstances in this case.

A minority disagree.

| 7. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the amounts of reductions of the fines based on the 2006 Leniency Notice. |
| --- | --- |

7.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the amounts of reductions of the fines based on the 2006 Leniency Notice.

| 8. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

8.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines.

| 9. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal. |
| --- | --- |

9.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal.

---
# C_2016453EN.01000302.xml

| 3.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 453/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 453/3

---

Communication from Ireland in accordance with Article VI of the Protocol annexed to the 1968 Brussels Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters

(2016/C 453/05)

In view of the amendments made to the legal order of Ireland by Section 8 of the Court of Appeal Act 2014 regarding the general jurisdiction of Court of Appeal,

IN ACCORDANCE with Article VI of the Protocol annexed to the Brussels Convention of 27 September 1968 and for the purposes of Article 64(e) of the Brussels Convention,

THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS SHOULD BE MADE TO THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION:

| (a) | the fifth indent of Article 37(2) should read as follows:
  ‘in Ireland, by an appeal on a point of law to the Court of Appeal,’ |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the fifth indent of Article 37(2) should read as follows:

‘in Ireland, by an appeal on a point of law to the Court of Appeal,’

| (b) | the fourth indent of Article 41 should read as follows:
  ‘in Ireland, by an appeal on a point of law to the Court of Appeal,’. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the fourth indent of Article 41 should read as follows:

‘in Ireland, by an appeal on a point of law to the Court of Appeal,’.

---
No. 09-7867.

#### Anthony M. Garraway, Petitioner v. Brian Fischer, Commissioner, New York Department of Correctional Services, et al.

559 U.S. 944, 130 S. Ct. 1513,

176 L. Ed. 2d 122,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1360.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 324 Fed. Appx. 98.
Headquarters, U.S. Space Force

“Semper Supra”

CLASSIFICATION

Col. James Jenkins

Space Force / Director of Staff

15 Nov 23

The overall classification of this briefing is: [Unclassified]

OPR: [Org Symbol]

U.S. Space Force Uniform 

Design and Development
“Semper Supra”

CLASSIFICATION

WHAT A DIFFERENCE 

A YEAR MAKES
“Semper Supra”

CLASSIFICATION

Hiring

 Signed MOU with AF Life Cycle Management 

Agile Combat Support 

 The MOU allowed for four (4) positions to be 

hired

1. USSF Program Manager (Wright-Patterson, 

AFB) – Responsible for overseeing the 

development of uniform designs

2. USSF Designer (Wright-Patterson, AFB) -

Responsible for development of uniform designs

3. Two (2) Logistics Management Specialists

(Defense Logistics Agency) – Responsible for 

overseeing procurement and production of 

USSF uniforms and medals from industry 

partners
“Semper Supra”

CLASSIFICATION

Physical Training Gear Status

 In production

− Will utilize a lightweight performance fabric

 Scheduled for delivery in first half of 

2024
“Semper Supra”

CLASSIFICATION

Service Dress

 Fit Testing Conducted in Feb/Mar 2023

 Conducting Wear Testing

 Production scheduled to begin next year

 Planned delivery to Guardians starting 

Dec 2025
“Semper Supra”

CLASSIFICATION

Still To Come

 Uniform items currently in Prototype 

Stage:

− Maternity

− Sweater

− All-Weather Coat (projected delivery 

late 2026)

 Uniform items currently in Design Stage

− Mess Dress Uniform (projected 

delivery 2027)
“Semper Supra”

CLASSIFICATION

Points of Contact

POC Title Email

Col. James Jenkins Director, Change Management Team James.Jenkins.40@us.af.mil

Cathy Lovelady Uniform Program Analyst Catherine.Lovelady@spaceforce.mil

Dave Cardinale Booz Allen Hamilton, Contract Support David.Cardinale.ctr@spaceforce.mil

Jessica Hair Human Capital (S1) Policy Jessica.Hair@spaceforce.mil

Headquarters U.S. Space Force

U.S. Air Force Uniform Office 

POC Title Email

Tracy Roan Chief, AF Uniform Office Tracy.Roan.1@us.af.mil

Aaron Needles Designer John.Needles.1@us.af.mil

Denise Chiobi Program Director for USSF Uniforms Denise.Chiobi@rus.af.mil