alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
China Green Energy Industries, Inc.: Exhibit 10.35 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.35

Loan Agreement between Changzhou City Wujin Best Appliances
Co., Ltd. and Wujin Rural Commercial Bank, pursuant to which Wujin Rural
Commercial Bank provided a loan with a total amount of RMB 5, 000,000. The loan
term is from May 23, 2011 to April 25, 2012. The annual interest rate is 8.75% .
# C_2016398EN.01000401.xml

| 28.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/4

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria

(2016/C 398/06)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons designated in Annex I to Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP (1), as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2016/1897 (2), and in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1893 (4), concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria.

1

2

3

4

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the above mentioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons and entities in Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP and Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012. The grounds for designation of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex IIa to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 16 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council before 1 March 2017, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s next review, pursuant to Article 34 of Decision 2013/255/CFSP and Article 32(4) of Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, of the list of designated persons and entities.

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 147, 1.6.2013, p. 14.

1

(2)  OJ L 293, 28.10.2016, p. 36.

2

(3)  OJ L 16, 19.1.2012, p. 1.

3

(4)  OJ L 293, 28.10.2016, p. 25.

4

---
# C_2016127EN.01000601.xml

| 9.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/6

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

1

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 127/05)

Decisions granting an authorisation

Decisions granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2016) 2003 | 8 April 2016 | Dibutyl phthalate (DBP)
  EC No 201-557-4
  CAS No 84-74-2 | Deza a.s., Masarykova 753, 75728 Valašské Meziříčí, Czech Republic | REACH/16/1/0 | The use of DBP as an absorption solvent in a closed system in the manufacture of maleic anhydride | 21 February 2027 | — | Risk is adequately controlled in accordance with Article 60(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. |

Reference of the decision (2)

2

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2016) 2003

8 April 2016

Dibutyl phthalate (DBP)

EC No 201-557-4

CAS No 84-74-2

Deza a.s., Masarykova 753, 75728 Valašské Meziříčí, Czech Republic

REACH/16/1/0

The use of DBP as an absorption solvent in a closed system in the manufacture of maleic anhydride

21 February 2027

—

Risk is adequately controlled in accordance with Article 60(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.

| — | There are no suitable alternatives at present. |
| --- | --- |

—

There are no suitable alternatives at present.

REACH/16/1/1

The use of DBP in propellants:

Formulation: industrial use of DBP as a burning rate surface moderant, plasticiser and/or coolant in the formulation of nitrocellulose-based propellant grains;

Use at industrial site: Industrial use of DBP-containing propellant grains in manufacture of ammunition for military and civilian uses, and pyrocartridges for aircraft ejection seat safety systems (includes propellants for police-force ammunition and excludes propellants intended for manual, private reloading of ammunition cartridges by civilian users, i.e., licensed individual sports shooters and hunters. No consumer use of DBP or its mixtures is covered by this use)

21 February 2027

REACH/16/1/2

The industrial use of DBP in ceramic sheets and printing pastes for production of capacitors and lambda sensor elements

21 February 2019

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/chemicals/reach/about/index_en.htm

2

---
No. 11-7968.

#### Charles Jordan, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1183, 132 S. Ct. 1157,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1028,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 946.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
### SERVE D JUL Y 1,201 0 .OrPTOFMHSPORW l U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N,, ,

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C . ' F0 ES f TH EMATTE RO F COMLU X AVIATIO NSERVICE S LLC ,

Respondent . FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10GL000 3 (Civi l Penalt y Proceeding ) DMSNO.FAA-2010-031 7 ADMINISTRATIV ELA WJUDGE' S ORDE R

CANCELLIN GHEARIN G Th e representativ e o f

th e Responden t

ha s aske dfo r

apostponemen t

o f th e hearing , no w se t

t o begi no nJul y 22 , 2010 . Hi s lette r requestin g th e postponemen t

represent s tha t

counse l fo r

th e Complainant , whe ncontacted , di dno t objec t t o apostponement . H e ask s fo r apostponemen t

o f a t leas t 6 0 days . Th e reques t

fo r postponemen t

i s granted . Th e Jul y 22 , 201 0 hearin g i s cancelled . Sinc e I wil l no t

b e availabl e fo r

thi s cas e afte r

Augus t 31 , 2010 , th e ne w hearin g dat e wil l b e se t b y th e administrativ e la w judg e t o who mthi s cas e i s reassigned . I T I S S O ORDERED .

Isaae^ . Bcnki n Administrativ e La w Judg eFAA DOCKE T NO . CP10GL000 3 (Civi l Penalty Action )

SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Mar k A . Nelson , Vic e Presiden t Comlu x Aviatio nServices , LLC , Responden t Formerly , Comlu x Completio nUS A 264 0 S . Carg o Driv e Indianapolis , IN4624 1 TEL : 317-472-737 0 FAX : 317-472-738 9 Chri s G . Zurales , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regional Counse l Great Lake s Regio n Federal Aviatio nAdministratio n 230 0 Eas t Devo nAvenu e De s Plaines , IL60018-469 6 TEL : 847-294-771 3 FAX : 847-294-749 8 Th e Honorabl e Isaa c D . Benkin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r

202-366-213 9 Legal Assistan t

202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso no r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio nAdministration

, 60 0 Independenc

e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000, Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         125,634
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,642,907
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             146,429,165
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,362,614
<BONDS>                                    128,276,747
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                (45,770,372)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               146,429,165
<SALES>                                     22,641,072
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,641,072
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               36,085,007
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (24,570,553)
<INCOME-TAX>                              (24,570,553)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (24,570,553)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (245,706)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (245,706)


</TABLE>
No. 11-7446.

#### Kevin Ricardo Morley, Petitioner v. Florida, et al.

565 U.S. 1166, 132 S. Ct. 1136,

181 L. Ed. 2d 994,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 896,

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 10(A)



 Exhibit 10(a) 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 







 Exhibit 10(a) 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 
 We consent to the reference to
our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of Additional Information and to the use of our reports: (1) dated April 3, 2012, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and
schedules of Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio, and (2) dated April 13, 2012, with respect to the financial statements of the subaccounts of the WRL Series Annuity Account, included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 16 to the Registration
Statement (Form N-4, No. 333-24959) under the Securities Act of 1933 and related Prospectus of WRL Freedom Wealth Creator Variable Annuity. 
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
 Des Moines, Iowa 

April 13, 2012
No. 11-6974.

#### Eleutorio Cortijo, Petitioner v. Steven Racette, Superintendent, Elmira Correctional Facility, et al.

565 U.S. 1073, 132 S. Ct. 786,

181 L. Ed. 2d 509,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8389.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 12.
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A194
To : Cc: Bcc: Subject: Data Request Follow-up Answer from Dr. H. Oliveira (re: Cell Biology and Toxicology

[2009] 25:341-353)

From: "Helena Oliveira" <holiveira@ua.pt> To: Erin Hines/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/21/2011 06:53 AM Subject: RE: Blood Lead Levels Thank you for your interest in my work. Unfortunately at that time we were not able to measure lead levels in blood, however we assessed the levels on testis, at day 5, meaning 24 h after last lead administration: Control:0.012 μg/g fresh weight 74 mg: 0.099 μg/g fresh weight 100 mg:0.136 μg/g fresh weight Regards, Helena Oliveira

----------------------------------------------------------- Helena Oliveira, PhD Laboratory of Biotechnology and Citomics Department of Biology, CESAM University of Aveiro Campus Universitário Santiago, 3810-193 AVEIRO Phone: +351 234 370 350 / Ext.22750
Fax: +351 234 372 587 Email: holiveira@ua.pt-----Mensagem original-----

De: Hines.Erin@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto : Hines . Erin @ epamail . epa . gov ] Enviada: quinta-feira, 17 de Fevereiro de 2011 15:24 Para: holiveira@ua.pt Assunto: Blood Lead Levels Hello, I am writing regarding your 2009 publication in Cell Biol Toxicol entitled "Lead Chloride affects sperm motility and acrosome reaction in mice." http://www.springerlink.com/content/jg41745543j36k77/ Did you collect blood lead levels or tissue lead levels for these animals? If so, what are these values? Thank you, Erin

Erin Pias Hines, Ph.D. Biologist U.S. EPA; Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Assessment Environmental Media Assessment Group Office B221K; Mailcode B243-01 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 (919) 541-4204 phone; (919) 541-2985 fax hines.erin@epa.gov
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS FOR FORM 10-Q**I, Steven P. Dussek, Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AmericanCellular Corporation (the “registrant”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements,and other financial information included in this quarterlyreport, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonable likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information;and (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     AMERICAN CELLULAR CORPORATION   November 9, 2005 /S/ STEVEN P. DUSSEK     Steven P. Dussek
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. § 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**§ 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mission West Properties,
      Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31,
      2008 as
      filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      each of Carl E. Berg, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
      the
      Company, Raymond V. Marino, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company
      and Wayne N. Pham, Vice President of Finance and Controller of the Company,
      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,
      that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Carl E. BergCarl
                E. Berg
              Chairman
                of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
              May
                7, 2008




/s/
                Raymond V. MarinoRaymond
                V. Marino
              President
                and Chief Operating Officer
              May
                7, 2008





/s/
                Wayne N. PhamWayne
                N. Pham
              Vice
                President of Finance and Controller
              May
                7, 2008




This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or otherwise required, be deemed filed by the
      Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
No. 11-7053.

#### Shaneka Pittman, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1071, 132 S. Ct. 792,

181 L. Ed. 2d 506,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8452.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 476.
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 2006-CR-3125, 2006-CR-3128B, 2006-CR-6116, and 2006-CR6117A, styled State of Texas v. Jesse Mendez , pending in the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl presiding. iii i i i



### MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-08-00481-CR IN RE Jesse MENDEZ Original Mandamus Proceedings 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Delivered and Filed: July 23, 2008 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On July 8, 2008, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, asking this court to order the trial court to set aside, with prejudice, all pending criminal felony indictments due to excessive delay and denial of his right to speedy trial. Mr. Sco tt McCrum has been appointed to represent relator in the trial court. We conclude that appointed couns el for relator is also his counsel for an original proceeding on the issues presented. A trial court cannot be found to have abused its discretion until the complainant establishes that the court (1) had a legal duty to perform a non-discretionary act, (2) was asked to perform the act, and (3) failed or refused to do so. O’Connor v. First Court of Appeals , 837 S.W.2d 94, 97 (Tex. 1992); Barnes v. State , 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding). When a motion is properly filed and pe nding before a trial court, the act of considering04-08-00481-CR

-2- and ruling upon that motion is a ministerial act. In re Chavez , 62 S.W.3d 225, 228 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding). Relator, in this case, has failed to provide evidence that he filed a motion with the court or that the trial court failed or refused to rule on such motion. Moreover, Respondent has no duty to rule on relator’s pro se requests because relator is represented by appointed counsel, and relator is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Patrick v. State , 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). Consequen tly, the respondent did not violate relator’s rights. Therefore, this court has determined that relator is not entitled to the relief sought, and the petition is DENIED. T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(a). Relator is encouraged to refrain from filing further pro se petitions regarding his pending criminal proceedings.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
No. 11-6188.

#### David L. Joe, Petitioner v. Walgreens Co./ILL, et al.

565 U.S. 986, 132 S. Ct. 517,

181 L. Ed. 2d 364,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7711.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 413 Fed. Appx. 928.