alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016409DE.01000702.xml

| 5.11.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 409/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 409/7

---

Berichtigung der Bekanntmachung der Einleitung eines Antidumpingverfahrens betreffend die Einfuhren bestimmter warmgewalzter Flacherzeugnisse aus Eisen, nicht legiertem Stahl oder legiertem Stahl mit Ursprung in Brasilien, Iran, Russland, Serbien und der Ukraine

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 246 vom 7. Juli 2016
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 246 vom 7. Juli 2016

(2016/C 409/09)

Auf Seite 7, Nummer 2:

Anstatt:

Anstatt:

„Bei der von der Untersuchung betroffenen Ware handelt es sich um warmgewalzte Flacherzeugnisse aus Eisen, nicht legiertem Stahl oder legiertem Stahl (ausgenommen rostfreier Stahl), auch in Rollen (Coils) (auch zugeschnittene Waren und Kaltband (‚narrow strip‘), nur warmgewalzt (warmgewalzte Flacherzeugnisse), weder plattiert noch überzogen, ausgenommen kornorientierter Siliciumelektrostahl (im Folgenden ‚zu untersuchende Ware)‘.“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

„Bei der von der Untersuchung betroffenen Ware handelt es sich um warmgewalzte Flacherzeugnisse aus Eisen, nicht legiertem Stahl oder legiertem Stahl (ausgenommen rostfreier Stahl), auch in Rollen (Coils) (auch zugeschnittene Waren und Schmalband (‚narrow strip‘), nur warmgewalzt (warmgewalzte Flacherzeugnisse), weder plattiert noch überzogen, ausgenommen kornorientierter Siliciumelektrostahl (im Folgenden ‚zu untersuchende Ware‘).“

---
**‘ oiwc~~**  **OF ’** **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS**

**B ”O”rn”**  **ILLLL ”** 
**. AUSTIN**  **Arr0111. ”** 

**0.rw ”**  **lL** 

### ttllr 1,,1*ss

. . e 0, ma iraIDtb offonr;* you hare tr or riosnlty or xouml l r oum8t on oe s

O?t he nt the tolloriry~~uor~

Wo hno boon unmblo 8o tind •~ 

### l thorlty with rrform00 

### to state pzoporty a8 would l nrtituta an 

### l

xoeption 

### to the role th6t 0 p8r8on rhall k proreeuted in the 

### oounty rhero thr offoncle

w.8 

### ooadttod. thr lolloming l rtiolor 

## 0r the Cob. of Grl~4nrl Rrooodure rpperr to oontrol the tonne ei the otiuua a8 

### stated above without dlstiaetion udo ktrrrn rtak pntpertp mid that $olon&g to 8ny I.ndirldorll

"Art. 190. on the boandar~ of two l ount%o~.a:. _~

~83 0 rm8e

l 0dttea 0 11

t he b 0w r ry

orbrp ,

t r0 oountles, or within Sour hundred yordo thereof,ray **be** promouted and punlrhul in l 

### lther oounty.* ***Art. LOO.**  R*oolVlng on6 eonollolin~ l toloa 

### propsrtx. ReOolrhIg 8nd OOAOOO~ing 

### otolen groprty arsy be proseouted in 

### the bounty when 

### the thofi XGOoonlttod, 

### or in any other county through or into rhlob the property MJ hare **beo;;;;m:yby** the perron 

### l

too)lng the ooao, or: wharo the mame uy have km. reoa’ wed or oonoralo4 by the oifwlore* f” . 

### In +l on of t he obore 

### l u t bor ltl o o,

**7mi** ore reopoottu11y w.lvl8*4 that it ir 

### thr opinion 0r thio 

### dbpwtmant thet l oompldnt 

### oher&iag one rltb reoelrlaa 8tolm property belong

### lq to the #tote, would hare to br film4 in the 

### l ounty oooordlq to the proviolono or Art1010 BOO, 0040 of Or*01 -Frooeauro, 1985. Trrrrlo 

### dounty would hero no Jur$rdlotla, of l uoh on 0trw00

u lll orr

t he l teto ’o Q ropwty

w a u l tolon in, or wno oarried through or rooelvd or oonoerled by the offender in oald oounty.

TrustioE the l

**bwo 8navm-a**  **your** guestion, we roPaln

YOurB tsq truly

APfROVSD JULY 10, **1939 o/**  **w. Y.**  **xooro** -3 ASSIsTAMT

ATN@iEX O$l@H&
No. 11-6964.

#### Katherine Schumann, Petitioner v. Debra Patrick, Warden.

565 U.S. 1120, 132 S. Ct. 1015,

181 L. Ed. 2d 751,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 392.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6333
MICHAEL F. DEHONEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHARLIE J. CEPAK, Warden, individually and/or in his official capacity, Defendant - Appellee.
No. 97-6541
MICHAEL F. DEHONEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHARLIE J. CEPAK, Warden, individually and/or in his official capacity, Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-1358-21BE) Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 30, 19972 Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael F. Dehoney, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Crouch Coleman, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying his motion to amend his complaint after Appellee moved for summary judgment (No. 97-6333), and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint (No. 97-6541). We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court's opinions accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dehoney v. Cepak , No. CA-96- 1358-21BE (D.S.C. Feb. 12, 1997, and Mar. 14, 1997). We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 11-569.

#### Indian River School District, et al., Petitioners v. Jane Doe and John Doe, Individually and as Parents and Next Friends of Jordon Doe and Jamie Doe.

565 U.S. 1157, 132 S. Ct. 1097,

181 L. Ed. 2d 978,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 768.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 653 F.3d 256.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of theglobe.com  (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael S. Egan, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 14, 2004

/s/ Michael S. Egan
-----------------------
Michael S. Egan
Chief Executive Officer



                                       37
No. 11-7786.

#### Barron Walker, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1170, 132 S. Ct. 1122,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1001,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 654.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 657 F.3d 160.
Order entered August 25, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00356-CR

JASON DANIEL SEWELL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219-82792-2013

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s August 24, 2015 amended motion to extend time to file 

his brief. We ORDER appellant to file his brief within TWENTY-ONE DAYS of the date of 

this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
exh10_53.htm


 













 


 








Addendum to Employment Agreement


Exhibit 10.53


 


Date: October 11, 2010


 


Scott Scampini


W285N3168 Lakeside Road


Pewaukee, WI 53072












Dear Scott,







This letter will serve as an addendum to your original Employment Agreement dated July 23, 2010 and is hereby made part of the agreement.







Said agreement is amended as follows:







Under Section 4 – Incentive Options, the following phrase to be deleted;







“Vesting will also be subject to achievement of KPI goals jointly agreed with CEO”







 


Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.


 







 







 



	 	 Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	 ZBB ENERGY CORPORATION
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 By:  ___________________________________
	 	        Eric Apfelbach (Chief Executive Officer)
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 By:  ___________________________________
	 	        Scott Scampini (Executive VP & CFO)





 


 




 


 


 


 



 




	
 N93 W14475 Whittaker Way


Menomonee Falls WI  53051 



Tel:  (262) 253 9800 Fax:  (262) 253 9822 


Email:  hbrown@zbbenergy.com 


 


www.zbbenergy.com



	  

PO Box 2047


Kardinya WA 6163


240 Barrington Street


Bibra Lake WA 6163


 Tel:  (08) 9494 2055 Fax:  (08) 9494 2066


 Email:  info@zbbenergy.com
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank

          - [Public Notice 108]

# AGENCY:

Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

# ACTION:

Notice and request for comments.

# SUMMARY:

The Export-Import Bank, as a part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The form will be used by Banks to apply for comprehensive or political insurance coverage on foreign banks for letter of credit transactions.

Our customers will be able to submit this form on paper or electronically.

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before April 28, 2009 to be assured of consideration.

# ADDRESSES:

Direct all comments and requests for additional information to Walter Kosciow, Export-Import Bank of the U.S., 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3649.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*Title and Form Number:*

Export-Import Bank of the United States Application for Issuing Bank Credit Limit (IBCL) Under Bank Letter of Credit Policy, EIB 92-36.

*OMB Number:*                     3048-0016.                

*Type of Review:*                     Regular.                

*Need and Use:*                     The information requested enables the applicant to provide Ex-Im Bank with the information necessary to process credit risk applications involving foreign letter of credit issuing banks.                

*Affected Public:*                     The form affects entities involved in the export of U.S. goods and services.                

*Estimated Annual Respondents:*                     371.                

*Estimated Time per Respondent:*                     20 minutes.                

*Estimated Annual Burden:*                     124 hours.                

*Frequency of Reporting or Use:*                     1 to 12 times per year depending on the particular respondent's need/risk portfolio.                

Solomon Bush,

Agency Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-4220 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 40725 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JOSE LUIS RODRIGUEZ

- SALAS, also known as Jose Bejarano , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:14

- CR

- 1788

- 1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis Rodriguez

- Salas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rod riguez

- Salas h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 17, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-40725 Document: 00513385158 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016No. 15

- 40725

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, co unsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-40725 Document: 00513385158 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 151 (Thursday, August 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 42065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20974]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated May 7, 1998, and published in the Federal Register 
on May 19, 1998 (63 FR 27590), Roche Diagnostic Systems, Inc., 1080 
U.S. Highway 202, Somerville, New Jersey 08876-3771), made application 
by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be 
registered as an importer of tetrahydrocannabinols (7370), a basic 
class of controlled substance listed in Schedule I.
    The tetrahydrocannabinols will be utilized exclusively for non-
human consumption in drug of abuse detection kits.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in Title 21, United States Code, Section 823(a) and 
determined that the registration of Roche Diagnostic Systems to import 
tetrahydrocannabinols is consistent with the public interest and with 
United Sates obligations under international treaties, conventions, or 
protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. Therefore, pursuant 
to Section 1008(a) of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act 
and in accordance with Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 
1301.34, the above firm is granted registration as an importer of the 
basic class of controlled substance listed above.

    Dated: July 17, 1998.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-20974 Filed 8-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
Date: 31 October 2023 *******************

NSN: 8920-01-713-8120 (IHCS) *MONOGRAPH: M41

 *******************

Item: Italian style herb and cheese swirl roll

Document: PCR-S-026, Swirl Roll, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 200 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Intact, round, light to medium tan color swirl roll with a reddish-orange color near the 

swirl edges; off-white to light tan color interior crumb; flecks of herbs throughout; 

slightly dense, uniform crumb structure, no evidence of excessive flour dusting; no 

evidence of excessive baking (materially darkened or scorched); no evidence of 

compression streaks when broken by hand. 

Odor: Moderate Italian seasoning, tomato, and slight cheese.

Flavor: Moderate Italian seasoning, tomato, and slight cheese, and a slight to moderate wheat 

flavor and may have a slight leavening aftertaste.

Texture: Tender, slightly chewy, slightly dense; not excessively dry or crumbly or excessively 

moist and gummy.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkened surface and interior crumb.

Odor: Extreme bitterness, sour, oxidized, rancidity, staleness, scorched. Loss of Italian 

seasoning. 

Flavor: Extreme bitterness, sour, oxidized, rancidity, staleness, scorched. Loss of Italian 

seasoning.

Texture: Excessively dry and crumbly or excessively moist and gummy.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures:

N/A

Special Notes:

This product should contain an oxygen scavenger packet. If defects such as oxidized or rancid odors or 

flavors exist, they are likely due to package failure or the absence of an oxygen scavenger. Some 

bleeding of the reddish orange sauce to the swirl roll is normal but may increase over time.
PCR-F-001A

APPENDIX A

8 August 2017

SUPERSEDING

15 January 2009

31

PCR-F-001A FIRST STRIKE BAR LABELS

A.1 SCOPE

A.1.1 Scope. This appendix provides additional guidance to help the specification 

developer define section D-2 requirements. This appendix is a mandatory part of this 

specification. The information contained herein is intended for compliance.
PCR-F-001A

APPENDIX A

8 August 2017

SUPERSEDING

15 January 2009

32

FIGURE 1, FLAVOR I

FIGURE A-1
PCR-F-001A

APPENDIX A

8 August 2017

SUPERSEDING

15 January 2009

33

FIGURE 1, FLAVOR II

FIGURE A-2
PCR-F-001A

APPENDIX A

8 August 2017

SUPERSEDING

15 January 2009

34

FIGURE 1, FLAVOR III

FIGURE A-3
PCR-F-001A

APPENDIX A

8 August 2017

SUPERSEDING

15 January 2009

35

FIGURE 1, FLAVOR V

FIGURE A-4
PCR-F-001A

APPENDIX A

8 August 2017

SUPERSEDING

15 January 2009

36

FIGURE 2, FLAVOR I

FIGURE A-5
PCR-F-001A

APPENDIX A

8 August 2017

SUPERSEDING

15 January 2009

37

FIGURE 2, FLAVOR II

FIGURE A-6
PCR-F-001A

APPENDIX A

8 August 2017

SUPERSEDING

15 January 2009

38

FIGURE 2, FLAVOR III

FIGURE A-7
PCR-F-001A

APPENDIX A

8 August 2017

SUPERSEDING

15 January 2009

39

FIGURE 2, FLAVOR V

FIGURE A-8
PCR-F-001A

APPENDIX A

8 August 2017

SUPERSEDING

15 January 2009

40

FIGURE 3, FLAVOR I

FIGURE A-9
PCR-F-001A

APPENDIX A

8 August 2017

SUPERSEDING

15 January 2009

41

FIGURE 3, FLAVOR II

FIGURE A-10
PCR-F-001A

APPENDIX A

8 August 2017

SUPERSEDING

15 January 2009

42

FIGURE 3, FLAVOR III

FIGURE A-11
PCR-F-001A

APPENDIX A

8 August 2017

SUPERSEDING

15 January 2009

43

FIGURE 3, FLAVOR V

FIGURE A-12
PCR-F-001A

APPENDIX A

8 August 2017

SUPERSEDING

15 January 2009

44

FIGURE 4, FLAVOR I

FIGURE A-13
PCR-F-001A

APPENDIX A

8 August 2017

SUPERSEDING

15 January 2009

45

FIGURE 4, FLAVOR II

FIGURE A-14
PCR-F-001A

APPENDIX A

8 August 2017

SUPERSEDING

15 January 2009

46

FIGURE 4, FLAVOR III

FIGURE A-15
PCR-F-001A

APPENDIX A

8 August 2017

SUPERSEDING

15 January 2009

47

FIGURE 4, FLAVOR V

FIGURE A-16
PCR-F-001A

APPENDIX A

8 August 2017

SUPERSEDING

15 January 2009

48

FIGURE 5, FLAVOR V

 FIGURE A-17
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6427

TAMARA STANFIELD , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. RICHARD GRAHAM, Warden; BRADLEY BUTLER, Security Chief; DAYENA CORCORAN, Commissioner of Correction; STEVEN BEEMAN, Sergeant; JEFFREY SHIMKO, Lieutenant , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. George L. Russell, III , District Judge. ( 8:16

- cv
- 04149

- GLR )

Submitted : July 26, 2018 Decided: July 31, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD , Circuit Judge , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Tamara Stanfield, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Tamara Stanfield appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reason s stated by the district court. Stanfield v. Graham , No. 8:16

- cv
- 04149

- GLR (D. Md. filed Mar. 27, 2018 & entered Mar. 28, 2018) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          52,054                  52,054
<SECURITIES>                                     6,327                   6,327
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,270                   7,270
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,933                  68,933
<PP&E>                                          14,350                  14,350
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 162,628                 162,628
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,276                  31,276
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           103                     103
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,166                  47,166
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   162,628                 162,628
<SALES>                                         16,502                  30,160
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,502                  30,160
<CGS>                                            4,582                   9,026
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,645                  44,093
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,614                   2,878
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,355)                (23,986)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,355)                (23,986)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,355)                (23,986)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.20)                  (2.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.20)                  (2.38)


</TABLE>
No. 11-620.

#### Forsyth Memorial Hospital, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services.

565 U.S. 1158, 132 S. Ct. 1107,

181 L. Ed. 2d 980,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 899.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 395 U.S. App. D.C. 41, 639 F.3d 534.