alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016250EN.01000701.xml

| 9.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 250/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 250/7

---

Corrigendum to Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 195 of 2 June 2016
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 195 of 2 June 2016

(2016/C 250/05)

On page 12, point 4, third bullet point:

for:

for:

‘Charente, limited to the cantons of: Argentat, Ayen, Beaulieu-sur-Dordogne, Beynat, Brive-la-Gaillarde-Centre, Brive-la-Gaillarde-Nord-Est, Brive-la-Gaillarde-Nord-Est, Brive-la-Gaillarde-Sud-Est, Brive-la-Gaillarde-Sud-Ouest, Corrèze, Donzenac, Égletons, Juillac, Larche, Lubersac, Malemort-sur-Corrèze, Meyssac, Seilhac, Treignac, Tulle-Campagne-Nord, Tulle-Campagne-Sud, Tulle-Urbain-Nord, Tulle-Urbain-Sud, Uzerche and Vigeois;’,

read:

read:

‘Corrèze, limited to the cantons of: Argentat, Ayen, Beaulieu-sur-Dordogne, Beynat, Brive-la-Gaillarde-Centre, Brive-la-Gaillarde-Nord-Est, Brive-la-Gaillarde-Nord-Ouest, Brive-la-Gaillarde-Sud-Est, Brive-la-Gaillarde-Sud-Ouest, Corrèze, Donzenac, Égletons, Juillac, Larche, Lubersac, Malemort-sur-Corrèze, Meyssac, Seilhac, Treignac, Tulle-Campagne-Nord, Tulle-Campagne-Sud, Tulle-Urbain-Nord, Tulle-Urbain-Sud, Uzerche and Vigeois;’.

---
No. 11-6630.

#### Monterial Wesley, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 993, 132 S. Ct. 537,

181 L. Ed. 2d 376,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7693.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 423 Fed. Appx. 838.
##### 



CERTIFICATE OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF
AMERICAN CELLULAR CORPORATION
  a.
    
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and thatb.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of
the Company at March 31, 2007, and the results of the Companys operations for the three months ended March 31,
2007.
 May 10, 2007
    
    /s/ BRUCE R. KNOOIHUIZEN

Bruce R. KnooihuizenExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0347.txt

-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:49PM -----

To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Rentz, Rebecca" <Rebecca.Rentz@bgllp.com> 

Date: 01/28/2010 05:13PM 

cc: "Holmstead, Jeff" <Jeff.Holmstead@bgllp.com>, "Wasson, Mike" 

<Mike.Wasson@Exterran.com>, <JDutton@jwoperating.com>, <David.O'Leary@warrenequipment.com> 

Subject: Rulemaking EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708

Melanie,

Please find attached SI Management Practice recommendations for your consideration. These 

recommendations are being submitted on behalf of Exterran, JW Power Company and CSI (EJC) but 

have also received input and support from others who operate SI RICE potentially impacted by the 

proposed rule.

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or need additional information. 

Thank you,

Rebecca 

Rebecca J Rentz | Counsel | Bracewell & Giuliani LLP 

711 Louisiana Street, Suite 2300 | Houston, Texas | 77002-2770 

T: 713.221.1176 | F: 713.221.2134 

rebecca.rentz@bgllp.com | www.bgllp.com/rentz | www.bgllp.com

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0347.txt2/19/2010 12:50:39 PM
Exhibit 35.17  LOGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1050-084, 8th Fl
401 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334  ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2017, by and among GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES
CORPORATION II, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator and Cayman Agent, WILMINGTON TRUST,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2017-GS7 (the Agreement). Capitalized
terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement,
I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:  1.
A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2019.  LOGOLeslie Hayton Managing Director
Wells Fargo Bank    Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

LOGO
25 March 2011 ****************************

NSN: 8940-01-545-1795 (SNFB) * MONOGRAPH NO: FS1-11

 *****************************

Item: Sandwich, Shelf Stable, Nacho flavored beef (Type I)

Document: MIL-DTL-32141, Sandwich, Shelf Stable, for Operational Rations

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 250 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 2 years at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Sandwich: no evidence of compression streaks, filling is fully enrobed in bread. 

Crust: uniform and medium golden brown.

Crumb: white to off white color.

Meat stick filling: reddish brown cured meat color and not appear dry or crumbly.

Odor: Sandwich: slightly spicy, fermented beef nacho cheese.

Bread: slight nacho cheese.

Flavor:

Meat stick filling: slightly spicy, fermented beef nacho cheese.

Sandwich: slightly smoked, fermented.

Bread: slight nacho cheese.

Texture:

Meat stick filling: moist, slightly chewy; not grainy or excessively dry.

Bread: slightly dense, uniform cell structure; not excessively dry, crumbly, or 

excessively moist and gummy.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance:

Meat stick filling: brown to black; dry, crumbly.

Bread: darkened or browned crumb; cracked crust, dry, crumbly. 

Odor: Stale, oxidized, rancid, scorched.

Flavor: Sour, bitter, stale, oxidized, rancid, scorched.

Texture: Meat stick filling: dry, crumbly, tough chewy meat.

Bread: dry, crumbly, or gummy. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

This product should contain an oxygen scavenger packet. If defects such as oxidized or rancid odors 

exist, they are likely due to package failure or the absence of an oxygen scavenger.

Special Notes

Each pouch shall contain one intact sandwich and one intact oxygen scavenger.

Some bleeding of filling into the bread crumb is normal but may increase over time.
No. 11-7240.

#### Daniel Cavazos-Reyes, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1098, 132 S. Ct. 858,

181 L. Ed. 2d 559,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8934.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 435 Fed. Appx. 402.
ENCLOSURE 2 

SUBSECTION 203.2 

DPSCM 4155.6

1/ The larger number of defects found was less than the appropriate value in 

column B of Table I; the results are comparable and the original inspection 

results shall be used to determine control compliance. The lot is considered 

nonconforming because the original results were used to determine contract 

compliance and those results were nonconforming. 

2/ The applicable results are the original results because the inspection and 

reinspection results were considered comparable. 

3/ The larger number of defects noted exceeded the appropriate value in 

column B of Table I; the reinspection results were noncomparable therefore the 

reinspection results were used to determine contract compliance for this AQL. 

The lot is considered conforming for this AQL. 

4/ The reinspection results equal the original results; they are automatically 

considered comparable. The appropriate value from column B is shown for 

illustration only; it was not necessary to note it because the number of defects 

found on the two inspections were equal. The original results are applicable and 

the lot is nonconforming for that AQL. 

5/ The larger number of defects noted equal the appropriate value in column B; 

the results were noncomparable and the reinspection results shall be used to 

determine contract compliance for this AQL. The let is considered 

nonconforming for this AQL. 

 
ENCLOSURE 2 

SUBSECTION 203.2 

DPSCM 4155.6 

 

 

 

EXAMPLES ILLUSTRATING COMPARABILITY DETERMINATIONS. 

1. Situation #1 – Only one AQL is involved in the reinspection and the results are comparable. 

 COL A # COL B # 

# DEFECTS FOUND (SMALLER TO USE 

AQL ACC/REJ ORG REINSP # OF DEFECTS) # ADJACENT TO COL A #

2.5 1 2 2 6 2 7 

 

RESULTS COMPARABLE REASON APPLICABLE CONFORMING FOR AQL

 YES/NO 1/ RESULTS

 YES ORIG 2/ NO 

2. Situation #2 – More than one AQL was involved in the reinspection; all reinspection results were found 

comparable. 

 COL B# 

 COL A# TO USE 

# DEFECTS FOUND (SMALLER # ADJACENT TO 

AQL ACC/REJ ORG REINSP # OF DEFECTS) COL A# 

2.5 2 3 5 8 5 12 

4.0 3 4 4 8 4 11 

10.0 7 8 8 6 6 14 

RESULTS COMPARABLE REASON APPLICABLE CONFORMING 

YES/NO RESULTS FOR AQL

 YES 1/ ORIG 2/ NO 

 YES 1/ ORIG 2/ NO 

 YES 1/ ORIG2/ NO 

3. Situation #3 – More than one AQL is involved in the reinspection; the reinspection results for two AQLs were 

determined noncomparable and the results for one AQL were determined comparable. 

 COL #A COL # B TO USE 

# DEFECTS FOUND (SMALLER # ADJACENT TO 

AQL ACC/REJ ORIG REINSP # OF DEFECTS COLUMN A#

2.5 2 3 4 0 0 3 

4.0 3 4 10 10 10 19 

10.0 7 8 8 17 8 17 

RESULTS COMPARABLE REASON APPLICABLE CONFORMING 

 YES/NO REASONS FOR AQL

 NO 3/ REINSP YES 

 YES 4/ ORIG NO 

 NO 5/ REINSP NO
No. 11-607.

#### Solange Chadda, et al., Petitioners v. Jeff Mullins.

565 U.S. 1178, 132 S. Ct. 1144,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1018,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1022.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 192.
No. 11-454.

#### Michael S. Polsky, as Receiver for Communications Products Corporation, Petitioner v. Daniel E. Virnich, et al.

565 U.S. 1111, 132 S. Ct. 1006,

181 L. Ed. 2d 735,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 231.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin denied.

Same case below, 332 Wis. 2d 1, 800 N.W.2d 742.
No. 11-6711.

#### Angeliki Papadimitriou, Petitioner v. John Papadimitriou.

565 U.S. 1056, 132 S. Ct. 797,

181 L. Ed. 2d 479,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8646.

November 28, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 19, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Same case below, 417 Md. 502, 10 A.3d 1181.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 140 (Wednesday, July 22, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39239-39240]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19462]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Office of Procurement and Property Management

48 CFR Parts 401, 402, 403, 407, 408, 409, 411, 416, 419, 422, 424, 
425, 432, 434, 436, and 452

[AGAR Case 96-03]
RIN 0599-AA00


Agriculture Acquisition Regulation; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Office of Procurement and Property Management, USDA

ACTION: Direct final rule; Confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the direct final 
rule that makes miscellaneous clerical or procedural amendments to the 
Agriculture Acquisition Regulation (AGAR).

EFFECTIVE DATE: The direct final rule published on May 15, 1998 (63 FR 
26993-26996) is effective July 14, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph J. Daragan, USDA Office of 
Procurement and Property Management, Procurement Policy Division, STOP 
9303, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9303, (202) 
720-5729.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a direct final rule published on May 15, 
1998 (63 FR 26993-26996), we notified the public of our intent to make 
a number of clerical or procedural amendments to the AGAR. We intended 
to amend the AGAR to reflect changes in the Federal Acquisition 
Regulation through Federal Acquisition Circular 97-01 and to correct 
minor errors and omissions in the reissuance of the AGAR published on 
October 15, 1996 (61 FR 53645-53677).
    We solicited comments concerning the direct final rule for a 30 day 
comment period ending June 15, 1998. We stated that the effective date 
of the proposed amendment would be July 14, 1998, unless we received 
adverse comments or notice of intent to submit adverse comments by the 
close of the comment period.
    We received neither adverse comments nor notice of intent to submit 
adverse comments by June 15, 1998. Therefore, the direct final rule is 
effective on July 14, 1998, as scheduled.


[[Page 39240]]


    Done at Washington, D.C., this 15th day of July, 1998.
W. R. Ashworth,
Director, Office of Procurement and Property Management.
[FR Doc. 98-19462 Filed 7-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-XE-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 58 (Wednesday, March 26, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 16854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06693]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Research, Engineering And Development Advisory Committee; Notice 
of Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to section 10(A)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is hereby given of a 
meeting of the FAA Research, Engineering and Development (R,E&D) 
Advisory Committee.
    Name: Research, Engineering & Development Advisory Committee.
    Time and Date: April 17--8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Place: Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue 
SW.--Round Room (10th Floor), Washington, DC 20591.
    Purpose: The meeting agenda will include receiving from the 
Committee guidance for FAA's research and development investments in 
the areas of air traffic services, airports, aircraft safety, human 
factors and environment and energy. Attendance is open to the 
interested public but seating is limited. Persons wishing to attend the 
meeting or obtain information should contact Gloria Dunderman at (202) 
267-8937 or gloria.dunderman@faa.gov. Members of the public may present 
a written statement to the Committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC on: March 19, 2014.
Gloria Dunderman,
Management & Program Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2014-06693 Filed 3-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
30 September 2009 *****************************

NSN: 8940 01 580 4428 (SRB) * MONOGRAPH NO: M3B1

 *****************************

Item: Santa Fe Style Rice and Beans

Document: PCR-S-019, Santa Fe Style Rice and Beans, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf 

Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 210 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Rice: Enriched, parboiled, long grain, milled rice, off white color, distinct grains, rice 

may have color from absorbed sauce.

Beans: Cooked bean color, practically free of broken beans, mashed beans, or loose

skins.

Corn: Whole kernel, cooked yellow corn color.

Green chili: Dices, cooked green chili color.

Black olive: Slices, black color.

Red bell pepper: Dices, cooked red pepper color.

Sauce: Glossy, opaque, medium yellow orange color.

Odor: Cooked rice with beans, cheese, and mild to moderate green chili seasoning and spices.

Flavor: Cooked rice with beans, cheese, and mild to moderate green chili seasoning and spices.

Texture:

Rice: Moist, slightly soft to slightly firm.

Beans and corn: Slightly soft to slightly firm.

Green chilies, black olives, and red bell peppers: Tender. 

Sauce: Moderately thick.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Sauce thick, grainy and/or separated (oiling off). Sauce moderately darkened or browned.

Odor: Scorched milk, sour milk, rancid, bitter. Low spice and/or pungency.

Flavor: Scorched milk, sour milk, rancid, bitter. Low spice and/or pungency.

Texture: Excessively soft rice, beans, and vegetables. Sauce grainy and excessively thick.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

If upon opening, the above characteristics are not apparent when product is cold, heat the product in 

boiling water or in a saucepan for several minutes before inspection. The product must be serviceable 

in the cold and heated state.

Over time the sauce will be absorbed by the rice causing the product to become pastier and the rice to 
30 September 2009 *****************************

NSN: 8940 01 580 4428 (SRB) * MONOGRAPH NO: M3B1

 *****************************

become softer.
No. 11-7721.

#### Willie Bud Reed, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1149, 132 S. Ct. 1071,

181 L. Ed. 2d 793,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 536.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
     SEC Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
     financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001063761
<NAME>                        CORPORATE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                        75,866
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 85,193
<ALLOWANCES>                                  18,408
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0<F1>
<PP&E>                                     3,213,984
<DEPRECIATION>                               658,332
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2,834,521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      856,219
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                  209,249
<COMMON>                                         264
<OTHER-SE>                                 1,610,397
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2,834,521
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             254,646
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                143,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1,445
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            32,799
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              121,604
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          121,604
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 121,604
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   4.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   4.49
<FN>
<F1>CPI does not report using a clasified balance sheet.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
No. 11-6355.

#### In re Dwight Martin, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 940, 132 S. Ct. 443,

181 L. Ed. 2d 290,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7242.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0347.txt

-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:49PM ----- To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Rentz, Rebecca" <Rebecca.Rentz@bgllp.com>
Date: 01/28/2010 05:13PM cc: "Holmstead, Jeff" <Jeff.Holmstead@bgllp.com>, "Wasson, Mike"<Mike.Wasson@Exterran.com>, <JDutton@jwoperating.com>, <David.O'Leary@warrenequipment.com> Subject: Rulemaking EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708 Melanie,

Please find attached SI Management Practice recommendations for your consideration. These recommendations are being submitted on behalf of Exterran, JW Power Company and CSI (EJC) but have also received input and support from others who operate SI RICE potentially impacted by the proposed rule.

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or need additional information.

Thank you,

Rebecca

Rebecca J Rentz | Counsel | Bracewell & Giuliani LLP 711 Louisiana Street, Suite 2300 | Houston, Texas | 77002-2770 T: 713.221.1176 | F: 713.221.2134 rebecca.rentz@bgllp.com | www.bgllp.com/rentz | www.bgllp.com

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0347.txt2/19/2010 12:50:39 PM