alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLMT922200-09-L13100000-FI0000-P;NDM 90111]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Per 30 U.S.C. 188(d), Whiting Oil and Gas Corporation, True Oil LLC, and Williams Production Rocky Mountain Company timely filed a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease NDM 90111, Billings County, North Dakota. The lessees paid the required rental accruing from the date of termination.

                        No leases were issued that affect these lands. The lessees agree to new lease terms for rentals and royalties of $10 per acre and 16                        2/3                         percent or 4 percentages above the existing competitive royalty rate. The lessees paid the $500 administration fee for the reinstatement of the lease and $163 cost for publishing this Notice.                    

The lessees met the requirements for reinstatement of the lease per Sec. 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). We are proposing to reinstate the lease, effective the date of termination subject to:
      - The original terms and conditions of the lease;
      - The increased rental of $10 per acre;
      - The increased royalty of 162/3                         percent or 4 percentages above the existing competitive royalty rate; and                    
      - The $163 cost of publishing this Notice.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Teri Bakken, Chief, Fluids Adjudication Section, BLM Montana State Office, 5001 Southgate Drive, Billings, Montana 59101-4669, 406-896-5091.

Dated: February 25, 2009.

Teri Bakken,

Chief, Fluids Adjudication Section.

 [FR Doc. E9-4434 Filed 3-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of BMW Vehicle Lease Trust 2017-2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
          under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation
          AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and
 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
          included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
          described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
    
 BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES NA, LLCBy:
          /s/ Stefan KramerName:
          Stefan KramerTitle:
          Vice President – Finance & CFO
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

721 

CA 12-02345 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

VINCENT GRASSO AND MICHELLE GRASSO, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF KATLYN 

GRASSO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DAVID FINN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

WAYNE C. FELLE, P.C., WILLIAMSVILLE (WAYNE C. FELLE OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL R. ARCHILLA, BUFFALO (LAUREN M. YANNUZZI OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y.

Devlin, J.), entered April 24, 2012. The order, inter alia, granted

the motion of defendant for summary judgment and dismissed the

complaint. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages

for injuries allegedly sustained by plaintiff Vincent Grasso (Vincent)

and plaintiffs’ infant daughter in a motor vehicle accident.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order that, inter alia, granted defendant’s

motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground

that neither Vincent nor plaintiffs’ daughter sustained a serious

injury within the meaning of the four categories of Insurance Law §

5102 (d) set forth in plaintiffs’ bill of particulars. We affirm. 

Specifically, with respect to the permanent loss of use category of

serious injury, defendant established that neither Vincent nor

plaintiffs’ daughter sustained a “total loss of use” of a body organ,

member, function or system (Oberly v Bangs Ambulance, 96 NY2d 295,

297). With respect to the permanent consequential limitation of use

and significant limitation of use categories of serious injury,

defendant established that some of the injuries sustained by Vincent

and plaintiffs’ daughter had resolved (see generally Gaddy v Eyler, 79

NY2d 955, 957-958), and that the remainder were merely mild, minor or

slight (see generally Dufel v Green, 84 NY2d 795, 798). Finally, with

respect to the 90/180-day category, defendant established that neither

Vincent nor plaintiffs’ daughter was prevented “from performing

substantially all of the material acts which constitute [his or her]

usual and customary daily activities” for at least 90 out of the 180
-2- 721 

CA 12-02345 

days immediately following the accident (§ 5102 [d]; see generally

Perl v Maher, 18 NY3d 208, 220). In response, plaintiffs failed to

raise a triable issue of fact with respect to any of those categories

of serious injury (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d

557, 562). 

In light of our determination, we do not address plaintiffs’

remaining contentions.

Entered: July 5, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
No. 11-576.

#### Pedro Jose Tartak Del Palacio, Petitioner v. Catalina Tartak Michael, et al.

565 U.S. 1157, 132 S. Ct. 1098,

181 L. Ed. 2d 979,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 716.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico denied.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




The
      undersigned, Lijun Peng, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of CHINA
      AGRITECH, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:




1.  
      The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008
      (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  
      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 14th
      day of May, 2008.




/s/
                Lijun PengLijun
                PengChief
                Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal
                Financial Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Agritech, Inc. and will be retained by China Agritech, Inc. and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




The
      forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      and
      is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
      made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
      language in such filing.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") by R.A.B. Holdings, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("Holdings"), and R.A.B. Enterprises, Inc., a Delaware corporation
("Enterprises" and, together with Holdings, the "Registrant"), each of the
undersigned hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and
         cash flows of the Registrant for the quarter ended June 30, 2003.



                                                        R.A.B. HOLDINGS, INC.



August 14, 2003                                         /s/ Steven M. Grossman
                                                        ----------------------
                                                        Steven M. Grossman
                                                        Chief Financial Officer



                                                        R.A.B. ENTERPRISES, INC.



August 14, 2003                                         /s/ Steven M. Grossman
                                                        ----------------------
                                                        Steven M. Grossman
                                                        Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant, and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4841 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2006 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To amend the Ojito Wilderness Act to make a technical 

correction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

HR 4841 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. OJITO WILDERNESS MAP. 

2 Section 2(1) of the Ojito Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 

3 1132 note; Public Law 109–94) is amended by striking 

4 ‘‘October 1, 2004’’ and inserting ‘‘January 24, 2006’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 14, 

2006. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 151 (Thursday, August 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 42014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20989]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-305-001]


Canyon Creek Compression Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

July 31, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 29, 1998, Canyon Creek Compression Company 
(Canyon) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third 
Revised Volume No. 1, Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 193 and Second 
Revised Sheet No. 194 to be effective August 1, 1998.
    Canyon states that these tariff sheets were filed in compliance 
with the Commission's letter order issued July 17, 1998 in Docket No. 
RP98-305-000 (Letter Order). Canyon believes that the tariff revisions 
made in the instant filing will bring Canyon's Tariff into full 
compliance with the Commission's Order No. 587-G.
    Canyon requested waiver of the Commission's Regulations to the 
extent necessary to permit the tendered tariff sheets to become 
effective August 1, 1998, pursuant to Order No. 587-G and the Letter 
Order.
    Canyon states that copies of the filing are being mailed to 
Canyon's customers, interested state regulatory agencies and all 
parties set out on the official service list in Docket No. RP98-305.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
Will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20989 Filed 8-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

GABRYL MARK SULLIVAN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-5065

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed August 1, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Thomas P. Barber, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Stephen M. Grogoza, Special 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for 

Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Susan M. Shanahan, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Gabryl Sullivan challenges his judgment and sentence for aggravated 

battery causing great bodily harm with a deadly weapon. See §§ 775.087(1), 
- 2 -

784.045(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016). Sullivan was convicted following a jury trial and 

sentenced to seven years in prison. On appeal, Sullivan argues in part that the 2017 

amendment to section 776.032, Florida Statutes, creating subsection (4), should apply 

retroactively to his case and that his motion to dismiss based on immunity from 

prosecution should be reconsidered under the statute as amended. This court's recent 

opinion concluding that the 2017 amendment to section 776.032, Florida's Stand Your 

Ground law, is procedural in nature and thus should be applied retroactively to pending 

cases necessarily controls our decision here. See Martin v. State, No. 2D16-4468, 

2018 WL 2074171, *4 (Fla. 2d DCA May 4, 2018), review pending, No. SC18-789.

Accordingly, as we did in Martin, we reverse Sullivan's judgment and 

sentence and remand for a new immunity hearing under the 2017 statute with 

instructions that if the trial court determines that Sullivan is not entitled to immunity, the 

court shall deny his motion and reinstate Sullivan's conviction and sentence. We 

recognize that the Third District Court of Appeal has recently held that the 2017 

amendment to section 776.032 imposes a new legal burden on the State such that it 

should be treated as a substantive change in the law which does not apply retroactively; 

we therefore certify conflict with Love v. State, No. 3D17-2112, 2018 WL 2169980, *3-*4 

(Fla. 3d DCA May 11, 2018), review pending, No. SC18-747. 

Reversed and remanded with instructions; conflict certified.

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
# C_2016484EN.01001701.xml

| 24.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 484/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 484/17

---

Communication in accordance with Article 34(7)(a)(iii) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, on decisions relating to binding information issued by the customs authorities of the Member States concerning the classification of goods in the customs nomenclature

(2016/C 484/04)

The customs authorities shall revoke decisions relating to binding information from 1 January 2017 if they become incompatible with the interpretation of the customs nomenclature as a result of the following international tariff measures:

Classification Opinions or amendments to the Explanatory Notes of the Nomenclature of the Harmonised Commodity Description and Coding System, adopted by the Customs Cooperation Council (CCC document No NC2237 — report of the 57th session of the HS Committee):

AMENDMENT TO THE EXPLANATORY NOTES AND CLASSIFICATION OPINIONS CONSEQUENTIAL TO THE ARTICLE 16 RECOMMENDATIONS OF 27 JUNE 2014 AND 11 JUNE 2015

(57th HSC SESSION IN MARCH 2016)

DOC. NC2237

Amendments to the Explanatory Notes of the Nomenclature and the Compendium of Classification Opinions annexed to the HS Convention pursuant to the Recommendation of 27 June 2014 and 11 June 2015 and elaborated by the HSC at its 57th meeting. Doc. NC2237.

| Explanatory Notes | U/1 |
| --- | --- |
| Classification Opinions | T/1 |

Explanatory Notes

U/1

Classification Opinions

T/1

AMENDMENTS TO THE EXPLANATORY NOTES AND CLASSIFICATION OPINIONS CONSEQUENTIAL TO THE ARTICLE 16 RECOMMENDATION OF 27 JUNE 2014

(58th HSC SESSION IN SEPTEMBER 2016)

DOC. NC2304

Amendments to the Explanatory Notes of the Nomenclature and the Compendium of Classification Opinions annexed to the HS Convention pursuant to the Recommendation of 27 June 2014 and elaborated by the HSC at its 58th meeting. Doc. NC2304.

| Explanatory Notes | N/3 |
| --- | --- |
| Explanatory Notes | N/5 |
| Classification Opinions | N/1 |

Explanatory Notes

N/3

Explanatory Notes

N/5

Classification Opinions

N/1

Information regarding the contents of these measures can be obtained from the Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union of the European Commission (rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 200, 1049 Brussels, Belgium) or can be downloaded from the internet site of this Directorate-General:

http://ec.europa.eu/comm/taxation_customs/customs/customs_duties/tariff_aspects/harmonised_system/index_en.htm

---
No. 09-8278.

#### Mervyn Lopez Albada, Petitioner v. Texas.

559 U.S. 979, 130 S. Ct. 1704,

176 L. Ed. 2d 193,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2177.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, denied.
No. 11-522.

#### Lamiaa Gouda, et vir, Petitioners v. HSBC Bank USA, NA.

565 U.S. 1113, 132 S. Ct. 1019,

181 L. Ed. 2d 738,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 243.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, denied.
# C_2016214EN.01002401.xml

| 15.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 214/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 214/24

---

Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

(2016/C 214/08)

Pursuant to the second indent of Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

1

2

On page 345:

On page 345:

8536 69 30

8536 69 30

For printed circuits

For printed circuits

The existing text and figures are replaced by the following:

‘This subheading covers plugs and sockets that are intended to be directly attached to a printed circuit board (PCB) or flexible printed circuit on at least one side of the plug or socket (see the examples below).

On page 346:

On page 346:

The explanatory note to CN code 8536 69 90 is deleted.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 76, 4.3.2015, p. 1.

2

---
MEMORANDUM 

To: File 

From: Tab Tesnau 

Subject: Conference call with the Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste 

 Management Officials (ASTSWMO) 

Date: October 15, 2010 

On October 15, 2010, EPA attended a conference call with a few representatives from the 

Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials (ASTSWMO) to discuss 

their comments on state regulatory stringency issues and to discuss State Agency’s comments on 

the petition process. 

EPA asked clarifying questions regarding the comments and on the structure of state beneficial 

use programs. 

Attendees: 

Charles Johnson, ASTSWMO, Municipal D Waste Task Force Chair 

Kerry Callahan, ASTSWMO, Solid Waste and Sustainability Staff Associate 

George Faison, EPA, ORCR 

Truett Degeare, EPA, ORCR 

Tab Tesnau, EPA, ORCR
# C_2016174EN.01002802.xml

| 14.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/28

---

Corrigendum to Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 171 of 12 May 2016
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 171 of 12 May 2016

(2016/C 174/12)

On page 5, section ‘Deadline for submission of tenders’:

for:

for:

‘27 June 2016, 10:00 CET’,

read:

read:

‘15 July 2016, 10:00 CET’.

---
No. 11-7023.

#### Moshe Cinque Canty, Petitioner v. James Esgrow, et al.

565 U.S. 1121, 132 S. Ct. 1020,

181 L. Ed. 2d 753,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 216.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judicial Department, denied.

Same case below, 83 App. Div. 3d 1322, 921 N.Y.S.2d 410.