alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016176EN.01000401.xml

| 18.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 176/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 176/4

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2016/C 176/04)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 23.2.2016 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 23.2.2016 till 30.6.2016 |
| Member State | European Union (All Member States) |
| Stock or Group of stocks | RED/N3M |
| Species | Redfish (Sebastes spp.) |
| Zone | NAFO 3M |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 01/TQ72 |

Date and time of closure

23.2.2016

Duration

23.2.2016 till 30.6.2016

Member State

European Union (All Member States)

Stock or Group of stocks

RED/N3M

Species

Redfish (Sebastes spp.)

Sebastes

Zone

NAFO 3M

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

01/TQ72

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4674 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4674

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 110 North Chestnut Street in Olathe, Kansas, as the ``Governor John 
                 Anderson, Jr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 110 
North Chestnut Street in Olathe, Kansas, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Governor John Anderson, Jr. Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Governor John Anderson, Jr. 
Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 2, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4674

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 110 North Chestnut Street in Olathe, Kansas, as the ``Governor John 
                 Anderson, Jr. Post Office Building''.
```
No. 11-7998.

#### Charles Williams, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1184, 132 S. Ct. 1159,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1029,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1055.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration 

# AGENCY:

Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. 

## Background 

Every five years, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (“the Act”), the Department of Commerce (“the Department”) and the International Trade Commission automatically initiate and conduct a review to determine whether revocation of a countervailing or antidumping duty order or termination of an investigation suspended under section 704 or 734 of the Act would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or a countervailable subsidy (as the case may be) and of material injury. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dana Mermelstein, AD/CVD Operations, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-1391. 

## Upcoming Sunset Reviews for April 2009 

There are no Sunset Reviews scheduled for initiation in April 2009. 

                        For information on the Department's procedures for the conduct of sunset reviews,                         *See*19 CFR 351.218. This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community. Guidance on methodological or analytical issues relevant to the Department's conduct of Sunset Reviews is set forth in the Department's Policy Bulletin 98.3, Policies Regarding the Conduct of Five-year (“Sunset”) Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders; Policy Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 (April 16, 1998). The Notice of Initiation of Five-Year (“Sunset”) Reviews provides further information regarding what is required of all parties to participate in Sunset Reviews.                     

Dated: February 23, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9-4342 Filed 2-27-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
No. 09-7966.

#### Henry James, Petitioner v. Sergeant Richardson, et al.

559 U.S. 946, 130 S. Ct. 1519,

176 L. Ed. 2d 126,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1243.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 344 Fed. Appx. 982.
No. 09-446.

#### Anthony Calabrese, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1005, 130 S. Ct. 1879,

176 L. Ed. 2d 362,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2731.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 572 F.3d 362.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

721 CA 12-02345 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

VINCENT GRASSO AND MICHELLE GRASSO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF KATLYN GRASSO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DAVID FINN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

WAYNE C. FELLE, P.C., WILLIAMSVILLE (WAYNE C. FELLE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL R. ARCHILLA, BUFFALO (LAUREN M. YANNUZZI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered April 24, 2012. The order, inter alia, granted the motion of defendant for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained by plaintiff Vincent Grasso (Vincent) and plaintiffs’ infant daughter in a motor vehicle accident. Plaintiffs appeal from an order that, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that neither Vincent nor plaintiffs’ daughter sustained a serious injury within the meaning of the four categories of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) set forth in plaintiffs’ bill of particulars. We affirm. Specifically, with respect to the permanent loss of use category of serious injury, defendant established that neither Vincent nor plaintiffs’ daughter sustained a “total loss of use” of a body organ, member, function or system ( Oberly v Bangs Ambulance , 96 NY2d 295, 297). With respect to the permanent consequential limitation of use and significant limitation of use categories of serious injury, defendant established that some of the injuries sustained by Vincent and plaintiffs’ daughter had resolved ( see generally Gaddy v Eyler , 79 NY2d 955, 957-958), and that the remainder were merely mild, minor or slight ( see generally Dufel v Green , 84 NY2d 795, 798). Finally, with respect to the 90/180-day category, defendant established that neither Vincent nor plaintiffs’ daughter was prevented “from performing substantially all of the material acts which constitute [his or her] usual and customary daily activities” for at least 90 out of the 180-2- 721 CA 12-02345
days immediately following the accident (§ 5102 [d]; see generally Perl v Maher , 18 NY3d 208, 220). In response, plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to any of those categories of serious injury ( see generally Zuckerman v City of New York , 49 NY2d 557, 562).
In light of our determination, we do not address plaintiffs’ remaining contentions.

Entered: July 5, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
----

Exhibit 31.2 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to**Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)****as Adopted Pursuant to****Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Lijun Peng, the Chief Financial Officer of China Agritech, Inc., certifythat: 

1.    I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China Agritech, Inc.; 

2.    Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report; 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

4.    Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a)    Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.    Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

(a) All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 14, 2006 

/s/ Lijun Peng              Lijun PengChief Financial Officer and Treasurer 

35 

----
No. 09-8304.

#### Judith Tompson, Petitioner v. Town of Salem, New Hampshire.

559 U.S. 980, 130 S. Ct. 1705,

176 L. Ed. 2d 194,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2038,

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of New Hampshire denied.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-11-00496- CV
Caroline Miller, C atherine Austin, Dewey T. Bell, Kim berly Bell, Mike Bellow s, Rhond a Bellow s, Curtis Dwayn e Bre aux, Li sa Gayle Breaux, Thomas J. Canton, Ver a Canton, Warre n J. Cark, P atric ia K. Clar k, Barbara Gar ry, Donna A. Gr een, et al., Appellan ts

v. Jose P astrana, Don Rao, Ron Walker, Jeff B ranick, P atric k Sw ain, an d Carl Gr if fi th, Appellees

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 53RD J UDICIAL DI STRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 1-0 0103 2, H ONO RAB LE TIM SULAK , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellants filed a notice of appea l on J une 3, 2011, and a corr ecte d notice of appea l

on J une 7, 2011. They have attempted t o ap p ea l from a final summary judgme nt signe d on April 6, 2011. Appellee s have filed a motion to dismiss this appea l for want of ju ri s d i ct i on, contending that appellants failed to comply with the filing deadlines provided in rule 26.1. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1 (notice of appea l must be filed within 30 day s afte r judgme nt signe d unless exception applies). They cer tify that appellants do not oppose the motion to dismiss

. Acc ording ly , we g rant appellee s’ motion and dismiss the appea l for wan t o f jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Jus tice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Rose and Goodwin Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: September

8, 2011

2
# C_2016409DE.01000701.xml

| 5.11.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 409/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 409/7

---

Berichtigung der Bekanntmachung der Einleitung eines Antisubventionsverfahrens betreffend die Einfuhren bestimmter warmgewalzter Flacherzeugnisse aus Eisen, nicht legiertem Stahl oder legiertem Stahl mit Ursprung in der Volksrepublik China

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 172 vom 13. Mai 2016
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 172 vom 13. Mai 2016

(2016/C 409/08)

Auf Seite 29, Nummer 2:

Anstatt:

Anstatt:

„Bei der von der Untersuchung betroffenen Ware handelt es sich um warmgewalzte Flacherzeugnisse aus Eisen, nicht legiertem Stahl oder legiertem Stahl (ausgenommen rostfreier Stahl), auch in Rollen (Coils) (auch zugeschnittene Waren und Kaltband (‚narrow strip‘), nur warmgewalzt (warmgewalzte Flacherzeugnisse), weder plattiert noch überzogen, ausgenommen kornorientierter Siliciumelektrostahl (im Folgenden ‚zu untersuchende Ware)‘.“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

„Bei der von der Untersuchung betroffenen Ware handelt es sich um warmgewalzte Flacherzeugnisse aus Eisen, nicht legiertem Stahl oder legiertem Stahl (ausgenommen rostfreier Stahl), auch in Rollen (Coils) (auch zugeschnittene Waren und Schmalband (‚narrow strip‘), nur warmgewalzt (warmgewalzte Flacherzeugnisse), weder plattiert noch überzogen, ausgenommen kornorientierter Siliciumelektrostahl (im Folgenden ‚zu untersuchende Ware‘).“

---
No. 09-491.

#### City of Long Beach, California, Petitioner v. Long Beach Area Peace Network, et al.

559 U.S. 936, 130 S. Ct. 1569,

176 L. Ed. 2d 110,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1166.

February 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 574 F.3d 1011.
No. 09-8728.

#### Martin Orosco-Ibarra, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 985, 130 S. Ct. 1720,

176 L. Ed. 2d 201,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 1956.

March 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 328 Fed. Appx. 533.
No. 11-7828.

#### Jason E. Frazier, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1171, 132 S. Ct. 1125,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1003,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 609.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

*1004Same case below, 429 Fed. Appx. 730.
# C_2016412EN.01000301.xml

| 9.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 412/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 412/3

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1961 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine applies

(2016/C 412/03)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (2), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1961 (3).

2

3

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1961.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with Section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (4).

4

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

2

(3)  OJ L 301, 9.11.2016, p. 1.

3

(4)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

4

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Entech  Environmental
Technologies,  Inc.,  a  Florida corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for
the  period  ended  June  30,  2004,  as  filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission  on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Burr Northrop, Chief Executive
Officer  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: October 13, 2004.

                                   By  /s/  Burr Northrop
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Burr Northrop,
                                     Chief Executive Officer of
                                     Entech Environmental Technologies, Inc.


<PAGE>
No. 11-7333.

#### Angela Denise Nails, Petitioner v. Ultimate Business Solutions.

565 U.S. 1163, 132 S. Ct. 1104,

181 L. Ed. 2d 989,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 805,

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. §1350



In connection with the quarterly report of Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William B. Olson, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This Certification has not been, and shall not be
deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.



Date: September 9, 2005

/S/ WILLIAM B. OLSONWilliam B. Olson Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
No. 11-6851.

#### Larry Wayne Anderson, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 1118, 132 S. Ct. 1009,

181 L. Ed. 2d 747,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 232.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.