**SUPPORTING STATEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY**  **NESHAP for Site Remediation (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGGGG) (Renewal) 1. Identification of the Information Collection**  **1(a) Title of the Information Collection** NESHAP for Site Remediation (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGGGG) (Renewal), EPA ICR Number 2062.0 5 , OMB Control Number 2060

- 0534 **1(b) Short Characterization/Abstract** The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Site Remediation were proposed on July 30, 2001 , and promulgated on October 8, 2003

. The most recent amendments to these regulations were proposed on May 1, 2006, and promulgated on November 29, 2006. These regulations apply to site remediation activities that use certain ty pes of equipment to clean up materials containing organics that potentially could be released to the atmosphere as a hazardous air pollutant (HAP). These site remediation activities can potentially be conducted at any facility where materials containing organic HAP currently are or have been stored, processed, treated, or otherwise managed at the facility . The ty pes of businesses most likely to be subject to the rule include, but are not limited to, organic liquid storage terminals, petroleum refineries, chemical manufact uring facilities, and manufacturing facilities using organic materials. This information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR part 63, subpart GGGGG

. In general, all NESHAP standards require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by

the owners/operators of the affected facilities. They are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring s ys tem is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, and are required of all affected facilities subject to NESHAP

. Any owner/operator subject to the provisions of this part shall maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least five years following the date of such measurements, maintenance reports, and records. All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority

. In the event that there is no such delegated authority , the reports are sent directl y to the U

. S

. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regional office. Based on our consultations with industry representatives, there is an average of one affected facility at each site and that each site has only one respondent (i.e., the owner/operator of the plant site). Over the next three ye ars, an average of 286 respondents per ye ar will be subject to the standard , and no additional respondents per year will become su bject to the standard. Of the 286 respondents, we estimate 243 respondents from the private sector (85 percent), 14 respondents2

from the state, local, or tribal governments (5 percent), and 29 respondents from the Federal government (10 percent). The O ffice of Management and Budget ( OMB ) approved the currentl y active ICR without any

“Terms of Clearance.” The “Affected Public” is owners and operators of facilities that conduct site remediation activities, and includes respondents from the private sector, state, local and tribal government, as well as the Federal Government. The burden to the “Affected Public” may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Site Remediation (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGGGG) (Renewal). The burden to the “Federal Government” is attributed entirel y to work performed b y either F ederal employees or government contractors and may be found below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Site Remediation (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGGGG) (Renewal). **2. Need for and Use of the Collection 2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection**  The EPA is charged under Section 1 12 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, to establish standards of performance for each category or subcategory

of major sources and area sources of hazardous air pollutants. These standards are applicable to new or existing sources of hazardous air pollutant s and shall require the maximum degree of emission reduction. In addition, section 114(a) states that the Administrator may require any

owner/operator subject to any requirement of this Act to: (A) Establish and maintain such records; (B) make such reports;

(C) install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, during such periods, and in such m anner as the Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; (F) submit compliance certifications in accordance with Section 1 14(a)(3); and (G) provide such other information as the Administrator may reasonabl y require. In the Administrator's judgment, HAP emissions from site remediation activities cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably

be anticipated to endang er public health or welfare. Therefore, the NESHAP were promulgated for this source category at 40 CFR part 63, subpart GGGGG

.3

**2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data** The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the standard(s) ensure compliance with the applicable regulations which where promulgated in accordance with the Clean Air Act. The collected information is also used for targeting inspections and as evidence in legal proceedings. Performance tests are required in order to determine an affected facility ’ s initial capability to comply

with the emission standard . Continuous emission monitors are used to ensure compliance with the standard at all times. During the performance test a record of the operating parameters under which compliance w as achieved may be recorded and used to determine compliance in place of a continuous emission monitor. The notifications required in the standard are used to inform the Agency or delegated authority when a source becomes subject to the requirements of the regulations. The reviewing authority may then inspect the source to check if the pollution control devices are properl y installed and operated, leaks are being detected and repaired , and the standard are being met. The performance test may also be observed. The required semiannual reports are used to determine periods of excess emissions, identify problems at the facility , verify operation/maintenance procedures and for compliance determinations. To minimize the burden, much of the information the EPA needs to determine compliance is recorded and retained on

- site at the facility . Such information will be reviewed b y the enforcement personnel during an inspection and will not need to be reported routinel y to the EPA. The Agency

requires respondents to report a minimal amount of information to demonstrate compliance. However , when a deviation occurs , additional information must be reported that describes the cause of the deviation, steps taken to c orrect the problem , and time re quired to return to compliance. **3. Non -**  **duplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria** The requested recordkeeping and reporting are required under 40 CFR part 63, subpart GGGGG

. **3(a) Non -**  **duplication** If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is sent directl y to the appropriate EPA regional office. Otherwise, the information is sent directl y to the delegated state or local agency . If a state or local agency has adopted its own similar standards to implement the Federal standards, a cop y of the report submitted to the state or local agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required by the Federal standards. Therefore, duplication does not exist.4

**3(b) Public Noti ce Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB**  An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this I CR was published in the Federal Register ( 77 FR 63813 ) on October 17, 2012

. No comments were received on the burden published in the Federal Register

. **3(c) Consultations** The Agency ’s industry

experts have been consulted, and the Agency ’s internal data sources and projections of industry growth over the next three years have been considered. The primary source of information as reported b y industry , in compliance with the recordkeeping and reporting provisions in the standard, is the Online Tracking Information System (OTI S) which is operated and maintained by EPA's Office of Compliance. OTIS is EPA’s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of all complianc e data. The growth rate for the industry is based on our consultations with the Agency ’s internal industry experts. Industry trade associations and other interested parties were provided an opportunity to comment on the burden associated with the standard as it was being developed and the standard has been previously

reviewed to determine the minimum information needed for compliance purposes. In developing this ICR, we contacted : 1) the American Chemistry Council (ACC) , at (202) 249

- 7000 ; and 2) Re genesis , at ( 949 ) 366

- 8000

. It is our policy

to respond after a thorough review of comments received since the last ICR renewal as well as those submitted in response to the first Federal Register notice. In this case, no comments were received. **3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection**  Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the standards. Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are applied and emission limitations are met. If the information required by these standards was collected less frequently , the proper operation and maintenance of control equipment and the possibility

of detecting violations would be less likely

. **3(e) General Guidelines** These reporting or recordkeeping requirements do not violate any of the regulations promulgated by OMB under 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5. These standards require the respondents to maintain all records, including reports and notifications for at least five years. This is consistent with the General Provisions as applied to the standards. EPA believes that the five

- ye ar records retention requirement is consistent with the Part 70 permit program and the five

- ye ar statute of limitations on which the permit program is based. The retention of records for five years allows EPA to establish the compliance history5

of a source, any pattern of non

- compliance and to determine the appropriate level of enforcement action. EPA has found that the most flagrant violators have violations extending beyond five ye ars. In addition, EPA would be prevented from pursuing the violators due to the destruction or nonexistence of essential records. **3(f) Confidentiality** Any information su

bmitted to the Agency

for which a claim of confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B

- Confidentiality of Business Information (CBI) (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979). **3(g) Sensitive Questions** The reporting or recordkeeping requirements in the standard do not include sensitive questions. **4. The Respondents and the Information Requested**  **4(a) Respondents/SIC Codes** Unlike a specific industry sector or type of business, the respondents potentially affected by this ICR cannot be easily or definitively

identified. Potentially , the site rem e diation NESHAP may be applicable to any ty

pe of business or facility

at which a site remediation is conducted to clean up media contaminated with organic HAP, and the remediation activities performed and the magnitude of the cleanup meets the applicability criteria specified in the rule. A site remediation that is subject to this rule potentially may be conducted at any

ty pe of privatel y owned or government

- owned facility at which contamination has occurred due to past events or current activities at the f

acility

. Site remediation performed at sites where the facility has permanentl y closed, the owner has gone out of business, or the facility has been abandoned and there is no owner (in this latter case, a government agency takes responsibility

for the cle anup) are not subject to this NESHAP in most cases. The regulated sources under this NESHAP (i.e., the site remediation activities) are not the predominant activity , process, operation, or service conducted at the facility . A comprehensive list of Standard Industrial Classification (SI C) codes and North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes cannot be compiled for the respondents who will potentially be regulated by this action due to the nature of activities regulated by the source category. The NAICS code indicates a primary

product produced or service provided at the facility rather than the presence of a site remediation performed to support the predominant function of the facility . Some representative NAICS codes for facilities where site remediation activitie s have been , or are currentl y being , conducted at some (but not all) facilities under a given code include : 325211, 325192, 325188, 32411, 49311, 49319, 48611, 42269, and 42271. However, these codes are not necessarily

comprehens ive as to the ty pes of facilities at which site remediation subject to the6

rule may be required in the future. **4(b) Information Requested (i) Data Items**  In this ICR , all the data that is recorded or reported is required by the NESHAP for Site Remediation (40 CFR P art 63, S ubpart GGGGG)

. A source must make the following reports:
**Notification s** **/Reports** Initial notification 63.7950(a), (c) Notification of performance tests 63.7950(a), (d) Notification of compliance status 63.7950(a), (e) Performance test results 63.7950(a), (e) Notification of alternative standard selection (if applicable) 63.7950(f) Semiannual compliance reports 63.7951(a), (b) Startup, shutdown, malfunction reports 63.7951(a), (b), (c) Part 70 monitoring report 63.7951(d) A source must keep the following records: **Recordkeeping** Copies of each notification and report submitted to comply with subpart as listed above 63.7952(a)(1) Records related to startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions 63.7952(a)( 2 ) Records of performance tests 63.7952(a)(3) Records of initial and subsequent determinations for affected sources exempted from control requirements 63.7952(a)(4) Records of control device operating parameter continuous monitoring system (CMS) deviations, calibrations, and maintenance 63.7952(b) Records to show continuous compliance with each emissions limitation, work practice standard, and operation and maintenance requirement 63.7952(c) , (d)7

Electronic Reporting Some of the respondents are using monitoring equipment that automatically records parameter data. Although personnel at the affected facility must still evaluate the data, internal automation has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordke eping at a plant site. Also, regulatory

agencies in cooperation with the respondents continue to create reporting systems to transmit data electronically . However, electronic reporting s ys tems are still not widely used. At this time, it is estimated th at approximately 10 percent of the respondents use electronic reporting.

**(ii) Respondent Activities**

**Respondent Activities** Read instructions. Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate CMS for opacity , or for pressure drop and liquid supply pressure for VOHAP

. Perform initial performance test, and repeat performance tests if necessary

. Write the notifications and reports listed above. Enter information required to be recorded above. Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and systems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of processing and maintaining information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of disclosing and providing information. Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information. Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information. Currently sources are using monitoring and reporting equipment that provide parameter data in an automated way ( e.g., continuous parameter monitoring s ys tem) . Although personnel at the source still need to evaluate the data, this ty pe of monitoring equipm ent has significantl y reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping.8

**5. The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management**  **5(a) Agency Activities** EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the acquisition, analysis, storage, and distribution of the required information. **Agency Activities** Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports, and excess emissions reports, required to be submitted by industry

. Conduct initial compliance determination. Audit facility

records. Input, anal yz e, and maintain data in the Online Tracking Information System (OTI S). **5(b) Collection Methodology and Management** Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority could inspect the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are properl y installed and operated. Performance test reports are used b y the Agency to discern a source ’ s initial capab ility to compl y with the emission standard. Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement programs. The semiannual reports are used for problem identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance determinations. In formation contained in the reports is entered into OTI S which is operated and maintained by

EPA's Office of Compliance. OT IS is EPA ’ s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data for approximately 125,000 industrial and government
- owned facilities. EPA uses the OTI S for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement b y local and state regulatory agenci es, EPA regional offices and EPA headquarters. EPA and its delegated Authorities can edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data. The records required b y this regulation must be retained by the owner/operator for five ye ars. **5(c) Small Entity Flexibility**  The rule place s no requirement on any facility to initiate site remediation activities. The EPA anticipates that parties that undertake site remediation generall y do so voluntarily and that the impact of this rule on those parties will not be significant. Further, because state s and other parties decide whether to undertake site remediation activities, predicting how many, or what9

ty pes of small entities will undertake such activities, is extremely difficult, if not impossible. Nonetheless, the rule is structured to avoid impacts on small businesses. The rule specificall y exclude s from its scope remediation conducted at gasoline stations, farm sites , and residential sites. Moreover, the rule appl ies only to remediation sites located at a facility that is a major source under the CAA and at which is collocated one or more non

remediation activities listed as a Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT ) major source category , pursuant to CAA section 112(c)

. Such sources tend to be large businesses. The rule also contains applicability emission thresholds that are likel y to exclude site remediation conducted at many small businesses. For example, the rule exempt s sources where the total annual quantity

of HAP contained in all extracted remediation material at the facility is less than 1 megagram per year. For these reasons, the rule does not impose a significant burden on a substantial number of small entities. **5(d) Collection Schedule** The specific frequency

for each information colle ction activity within this request is shown in below Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Site Remediation (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGGGG) (Renewal)

. **6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection** Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for the subpart included in this ICR. The individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Wherever appropriate, specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified. Responses to this information collection are mandatory

. The Agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, any collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. **6(a) Estimating Respondent Burden** The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from these recordkeeping and reporting requirement s is estimated to be 1 40 , 338 hours ( Total Labor Hours from Table 1 below). These hours are based on Agency studies and background documents from the development of the regulation, Agency knowledge and experience with the NESHAP program, the previously

approved ICR, and any comments received. **6(b) Estimating Respondent Costs (i) Estimating Labor Costs**  This ICR uses the following labor rates:10 Managerial $ 121.44 ($ 57.83 + 110%) Technical $ 100.23 ($ 47.73 + 110%) Clerical $ 50.51 ($ 24.05 + 110%) These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 2012 , “ Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group. ” The rates are from column 1, “ Total compensation. ” The rates have been increased b y 110 p ercent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry

. **(ii) Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs** The ty pe of industry

costs associated with the information collection activities in the subject standard are both labor costs which are addressed elsewhere in this ICR and the costs associated with continuous monitoring. The capital/startup costs are one

- time costs when a facility becomes subject to the regulation. The annual operation and maintenance costs are the ongoing costs to maintain the monitor s and other costs such as photocop yi ng and postage.

**(iii) Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs**  (A) Continuous Monitoring Device (B)

Capital/Startup Cost for One Respondent (C)

Number of New Respondents (D)

Total Capital/Startup Cost, (B X C) (E)

Annual O&M Costs for One Respondent (F)

Number of Respondents with O&M (G)

Total O&M, (E X F) Parametric system $10,000 0 $ 0 $2,000 286 $572,000 Leak detection $1,500 0 $ 0 $1,000 10 $10,000 Total $ 0 $582,000 There are no capital/startup costs for this ICR

. This is the total o f column D in the above table. The total operation and maintenance (O&M) costs for this I CR are $582,000

. This is the total of column G , which is the total cost for all 286 respondents

. The cost estimate includes $494,496 from the private sector (243 respondents), $28,490 from the state, local, or tribal governments, (14 respondents), and $59,014 from the Federal government (29 respondents). The average annual cost for capital/startup and operation and maintenance costs to industry

over the next three years of the IC R is estimated to be $582,000. These are recordkeeping costs.11

**6(c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost** The costs to the Agency

are those costs associated with analysis of the reported information. EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program includes activities such as the examination of records maintained by the respondents , periodic inspection of sources of emissions, and the publication and distribution of collected information. Note the burden (both labor costs and O&M) to the Federal government respondents have been previously summarized in section 6(b). The average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is estimated to be $ 365 , 375

. This cost is based on the average hourl y labor rate as follows: Managerial $ 6 2.27 (GS

- 13, Step 5, $ 3 8. 92 + 60% ) Technical $ 4 6

. 21 (GS

- 12, Step 1, $ 28. 88 + 60% ) Clerical $2 5.01 (GS

- 6, Step 3, $ 15. 63 + 60% ) These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) , 2012 General Schedule , which excludes locality , rates of pay

. The rates have been increased b y 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees . Details upon which this estimate is based appear below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Site Remediation (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGGGG) (Renewal)

. **6(d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs** Based on our research for this I CR, on average over the next three ye ars, approximately 286 existing respondents will be subject to the standard. It is estimated that no additional respondents per ye ar will become subject ; therefore, the overall average number of respondents, as shown in the table below , is 286 per year. The number of respondents is calculated using the following table that addresses the three ye ars covered b y this ICR. **Number of Respondents**

Year (A) Number of Ne w Respondents 1 (B)

Number of Existing Respondents (C)

Number of Existing Respondents that keep records but do not submit reports (D) Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents (E)

Number of Respondents (E=A+B+C

- D)

1 0 286 0 0 286 2 0 286 0 0 28612 **Number of Respondents** 3 0 286 0 0 286 Average 286 286 1 New respondent include sources with constructed, reconstructed and modified affected facilities.

. C olumn D is subtracted to avoid double

- counting respondents

. As shown above, the average Number of Respondents over the three ye ar period of this ICR is 286 (243 respondents from the private sector , 14 respondents from the state, local, or tribal governments , and 29 respondents from the Federal government)

. The total number of annual responses per ye ar is calculated using the following table: **Total Annual Responses** (A) Information Collection Activity (B) Number of Respondents (C)

Number of Responses (D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports (E) Total Annual Responses E=(BxC)+D

Semiannual reports 286 2 0 572 Total 572 The number of Total Annual Responses is 572

. The total annual labor costs are $1 3 ,7 20 , 48 8

. Details regarding these estimates may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Site Remediation (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGGGG) (Renewal)

. **6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables** The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the respondents and the Agency are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectivel y, and summarized below. **(i) Respondent Tally** The total annual labor hours are 140,338 hours at a cost of $13,720, 488

. Details regarding these estimates may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Site Remediation (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGGGG) (Renewal)

. Furthermore, the annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this colle ction of information is estimated to average 2 45 hours per response

.13

The total annual capital/startup and O&M costs to the regulated entity are $582,000

. The cost calculations are detailed in Section 6(b)(iii), Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs. **(ii) The Agency Tally** The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three years is estimated to be 7,322 labor hours at a cost of $ 365 , 375 . See below Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Site Remediation (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGGGG) (Renewal)

. **6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden** There is an adjustment increase in labor hours and costs from the most recent ICR. This is not due to any

program changes. The increase in labor hours is due to a change in the burd en calculation methodology

. The previous ICR did not account for managerial and clerical hours for some burden activities. This ICR assumes that managerial and clerical hours are 5 percent and 10 percent of technical hours for each burden activity , respe ctivel y. The increase in costs is due to an increase in labor rates, as well as the methodology change described above. **6(g) Burden Statement** The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 2 45 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended b y persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and s ys tems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to compl y with any previously

applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Numbers for EPA regulations are listed at 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15. To c omment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this IC R under Docket ID Number EPA

–HQ

–OECA

–2012

–0695

. An electronic version of the public docket is available at http://www.regulations.gov , which may be used to obtain a copy

of the draft collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically

. When in the system , select “search,” then key in the docket ID number identified in this document. The documents are also available for public viewing at the Enforcement and14

Compliance Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334 , 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m . to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday , excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566

- 1744, and the telephone number for the docket center i s (202) 566

- 1752

. Also, you can send comments to the Office of In formation and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA

–HQ

–OECA

–2012

–0695 and OMB Control Number 2060

- 0 53 4 in any correspondence.

**Part B of the Supporting Statement**  This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in collecting this information.15

**Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost** 

**– NESHAP for Site Remediation (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGGGG) (Renewal)** 

Burden Item (A) Person hours per occurrence (B)

Number of occurrences per year (C)

Person hrs per respondent per year (C=AxB) (D)

Respondents per year a (E)

Technical person hrs per year (E=CxD) (F)

Manage ment person hrs per year (F=Ex0.05) (G)

Clerical person hrs per year (G=Ex0.1) (H)

Total Cost per year ($) b

**Private Sector 1. Applications**  NA **2. Surveys and Studies** NA **3. Parametric** 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 0 Monitoring System **4. Reporting requirements**

- Read instructions 16 1 16 0 0 0 0 0

- Conduct performance test 120 1 120 0 0 0 0 0

- Initial notification 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

- Performance test notification 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

- Initial compliance determination 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 0

- Performance test report 80 1 80 0 0 0 0 0

- Semiannual report d 40 2 80 243 19,440 972 1,944 $2,164,702.32

- SSM report 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 **Subtotal Reporting for Private Sector**  **22,356 $2,164,702.32**  **5. Recordkeeping requirements**

- Read instructions 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 0

- Plan activities 100 1 100 0 0 0 0 0

- Prepare SSM plan 80 1 80 0 0 0 0 0

- Prepare documentation for exempted sources 80 1 80 22.1 1,768 88.4 176.8 $196,872.10

- In

- situ process vents parametric monitoring c 0.5 365 182.5 22.1 4,033.25 201.66 403.33 $449,114.49

- Ex

- situ process vents parametric monitoring e 0.5 365 182.5 220.9 40,314.25 2,015.71 4,031.43 $4,489,112.6816

Burden Item (A) Person hours per occurrence (B)

Number of occurrences per year (C)

Person hrs per respondent per year (C=AxB) (D)

Respondents per year a (E)

Technical person hrs per year (E=CxD) (F)

Manage ment person hrs per year (F=Ex0.05) (G)

Clerical person hrs per year (G=Ex0.1) (H)

Total Cost per year ($) b

- Inspect tank covers 2 12 24 216.7 5,200.8 260.04 520.08 $579,124.68

- Inspect container covers 0.5 12 6 220.9 1,325.4 66.27 132.54 $147,587.27

- Inspect surface impoundment covers f 2 12 24 4.2 100.8 5.04 10.08 $11,224.38

- Inspect separator covers h 2 12 24 4.2 100.8 5.04 10.08 $11,224.38

- Inspect transfer system covers 0.5 12 6 220.9 1,325.4 66.27 132.54 $147,587.27

- Leak detection and repair program g 100 1 100 8.5 850 42.5 85 $94,650.05

- Develop record system 100 1 100 0 0 0 0 0

- Enter information i 2 52 104 243 25,272 1,263.6 2,527.2 $2,814,113.02

- Personnel training 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 **Subtotal Recordkeeping for Private Sector**  **92,334 .3**  **$8,940,610.32 Total for**  **the Private Sector**  **114,690 .3**  **$11,105,312.64 State, Local or**  **Tribal Government 1. Applications**  NA **2. Surveys and Studies** NA **3. Parametric** 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 0 Monitoring System **4. Reporting requirements**

- Read instructions 16 1 16 0 0 0 0 0

- Conduct performance test 120 1 120 0 0 0 0 0

- Initial notification 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

- Performance test notification 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

- Initial compliance determination 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 0

- Performance test report 80 1 80 0 0 0 0 017

Burden Item (A) Person hours per occurrence (B)

Number of occurrences per year (C)

Person hrs per respondent per year (C=AxB) (D)

Respondents per year a (E)

Technical person hrs per year (E=CxD) (F)

Manage ment person hrs per year (F=Ex0.05) (G)

Clerical person hrs per year (G=Ex0.1) (H)

Total Cost per year ($) b

- Semiannual report d 40 2 80 14 1 , 120 56 112 $124,715.36

- SSM report 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 **Subtotal Reporting for State/Local/Tribal**  **Government 1,288**  **$124,715.36 5. Recordkeeping requirements** 

- Read instructions 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 0

- Plan activities 100 1 100 0 0 0 0 0

- Prepare SSM plan 80 1 80 0 0 0 0 0

- Prepare documentation for exempted sources 80 1 80 1.3 104 5.2 10.4 $11,580.71

- In

- situ process vents parametric monitoring c 0.5 365 182.5 1.3 237.25 11.86 23.73 $26,418.50

- Ex

- situ process vents parametric monitoring e 0.5 365 182.5 12.7 2,317.75 115.89 231.78 $258,088.42

- Inspect tank covers 2 12 24 12.5 300 15 30 $33,405.90

- Inspect container covers 0.5 12 6 12.7 76.2 3.81 7.62 $8,485.10

- Inspect surface impoundment covers f 2 12 24 0.2 4.8 0.24 0.48 $534.49

- Inspect separator covers h 2 12 24 0.2 4.8 0.24 0.48 $534.49

- Inspect transfer system covers 0.5 12 6 12.7 76.2 3.81 7.62 $8,485.10

- Leak detection and repair program g 100 1 100 0.5 50 2.5 5 $5,567.65

- Develop record system 100 1 100 0 0 0 0 0

- Enter information i 2 52 104 14 1,456 72.8 145.6 $162,129.97

- Personnel training 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 **Subtotal Recordkeeping for State/Local/Tribal**  **Government 5,321**  **.1 $515,230.33**  **Total for the**  **State, Local or Tribal Government 6,609**  **.1 $639,945.69**  **Federal Government 1. Applications**  NA18

Burden Item (A) Person hours per occurrence (B)

Number of occurrences per year (C)

Person hrs per respondent per year (C=AxB) (D)

Respondents per year a (E)

Technical person hrs per year (E=CxD) (F)

Manage ment person hrs per year (F=Ex0.05) (G)

Clerical person hrs per year (G=Ex0.1) (H)

Total Cost per year ($) b
**2. Surveys and Studies** NA **3. Parametric** Monitoring System 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 0 **4. Reporting requirements**

- Read instructions 16 1 16 0 0 0 0 0

- Conduct performance test 120 1 120 0 0 0 0 0

- Initial notification 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

- Performance test notification 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

- Initial compliance determination 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 0

- Performance test report 80 1 80 0 0 0 0 0

- Semiannual report d 40 2 80 29 2,320 1,160 232 $385,122.32

- SSM report 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 **Subtotal Reporting for Federal Government 3,712**  **$385,122.32 5. Recordkeeping requirements** 

- Read instructions 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 0

- Plan activities 100 1 100 0 0 0 0 0

- Prepare SSM plan 80 1 80 0 0 0 0 0

- Prepare documentation for exempted sources 80 1 80 2.6 208 104 20.8 $34,528.21

- In

- situ process vents parametric monitoring c 0.5 365 182.5 2.6 474.5 237.25 47.45 $78,767.47

- Ex

- situ process vents parametric monitoring e 0.5 365 182.5 26.4 4,818 2,409 481.8 $799,792.82

- Inspect tank covers 2 12 24 25.9 621.6 310.8 62.16 $103,186.22

- Inspect container covers 0.5 12 6 26.4 158.4 79.2 15.84 $26,294.56

- Inspect surface impoundment covers f 2 12 24 0.5 12 6 1.2 $1,992.01

- Inspect separator covers h 2 12 24 0.5 12 6 1.2 $1,992.01

- Inspect transfer system covers 0.5 12 6 26.4 158.4 79.2 15.84 $26,294.56

- Leak detection and repair program g 100 1 100 1 100 50 10 $16,600.10

- Develop record system 100 1 100 0 0 0 0 019

Burden Item (A) Person hours per occurrence (B)

Number of occurrences per year (C)

Person hrs per respondent per year (C=AxB) (D)

Respondents per year a (E)

Technical person hrs per year (E=CxD) (F)

Manage ment person hrs per year (F=Ex0.05) (G)

Clerical person hrs per year (G=Ex0.1) (H)

Total Cost per year ($) b

- Enter information i 2 52 104 29 3,016 1,508 301.6 $500,659.02

- Personnel training 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 **Subtotal Recordkeeping for Federal Government 15,326.2**  **$1,590,106.98 Total for**  **the Federal Government**  **19,038.2 $1,975,229.30**  **Total Labor Burden and Cost (rounded) 140**  **, 33**  **8 $1**  **3 ,7**  **20 ,**  **48 8**  **Assumptions :**  a We have assumed that there are approximately 286 respondents, with no additional new sources becoming subject to the rule over the next three years. The breakdown if as follows: 243 respondents for from the private sector, 29 from the Federal government, and 14 from state, local or tribal governments. b

. This ICR uses the following labor rates: $100.23 for technical, $121.44 for managerial, and $50.51 for clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 2012, “Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group.” The rates are from column 1, “T otal compensation.” The rates have been increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those em ployed by private industry. c We have assumed that 26 out of 286 respondents (9 percent) are estimated to use an in

- situ treatment process. At each of these sites, it is assumed that a control device is required on the process vent. d We have assumed that each respondents will take 40 hours twice per year to complete semiannual report. e We have assumed that respondents will each take 0.5 hours 365 time per year to monitor ex - situ process vents parametric

. It is also assumed that out of 286 respondents, 90 percent or (260 respondents)will use an on

- site ex - situ treatment process. f We have assumed that respondents will beach take 2hours once per month to inspect surface impoundment. It is assumed that 5 out of 260 sites use a surface impoundment in place of tanks. g We have assumed that 10 facilities will be impl ementing a LDAR program. h We have assumed that each respondent will take 2 hours once per month to inspect separator covers. It is also assumed that f ive of the sites will use oil

- water separators. i We have assumed that each respondent will take 2 hours 52 times per year to enter information.20

**Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost**

**– NESHAP for Site Remediation (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGGGG)**  **(Renewal)**

Burden Item (A) Person hours per occurrence (B)

Number of occurrences per ye ar (C)

Person hrs per respondent per year (C=AxB) (D)

Respondents per year a (E)

Technical person hrs per year (E=CxD) (F)

Manage ment person hrs per year (F=Ex0.05) (G)

Clerical person hrs per year (G=Ex0.1) (H)

Cost per year ($)
Report Review
a. Initial notification 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b. Performance test notification 2 0 0 286 0 0 0 0 c. Initial compliance determination 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d. Performance test reports 24 0 0 286 0 0 0 0 e. Semiannual report c 8 2 16 286 4,576 2,288 457.6 $365,375.30 **Total Annual Burden and Cost (rounded) 7,322**  **$365,375 Assumptions**  **:**

a We have assumed that there are approximately 286 respondents, with no additional new sources becoming subject to the rule over the next three years. The breakdown if as follows: 243 respondents for from the private sector, 29 from the Federal government, and 14 from state, local or tribal governments. b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $46.21 for technical, $62.27 for managerial, and $25.01 for clerical labor. These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2011 General Schedule, which excludes locality rates of pay. The rates h ave been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government em ployees

. c We have assumed that it will take eight hours twice per year for each respondent to review semiannual report.