alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.19

 

English Summary of the Equity Transfer Agreement between Beijing Syswin Xing Ye Real Estate Brokerage Company Limited and Ms. Ying Lu dated February 23, 2012

 

On February 23, 2012, Beijing Syswin Xing Ye Real Estate Brokerage Company Limited (the “Syswin Xing Ye”) enters into an equity transfer agreement (the “Agreement”) with Ms. Ying Lu (“Ying Lu”) to acquire 8% equity interest of Shenzhen Syswin Xing Ye Real Estate Brokerage Company Limited (“Shenzhen Syswin” or the “Target”), a limited liability company incorporated in Shenzhen which provides real estate agency services.

 

As of the date of the Agreement, Syswin Xing Ye and Ying Lu respectively holds 92% and 8% equity interest in the Target, which has certain wholly-owned subsidiaries and branches (collectively, the “Target’s Subsidiaries”).

 

Equity Transfer

 

Ying Lu shall transfer 8% equity interest in the Target to Syswin Xing Ye (the “Equity Transfer”). Upon completion of the Equity Transfer, 100% equity interest in the Target would be owned by Syswin Xing Ye.

 

Purchase Price

 

The purchase price for 8% equity interest in the Target shall be RMB0.8 million (the “Purchase Price”).

 

In consideration of the Purchase Price, Ying Lu shall transfer to Syswin Xing Ye: (i) 8% equity interest in the Target; (ii) the managing rights and all future income and benefits in the Target and Target’s Subsidiaries; and (iii) the benefits and interest in the Target and the Target’s Subsidiaries held by Ying Lu as of February 29, 2012, unless otherwise agreed upon.

 

Payment Schedule

 

Syswin Xing Ye shall pay RMB0.4 million to Ying Lu on February 29, 2012.

 

On the date immediately after the completion of the registration of the Equity Transfer with the Administration for Industry and Commerce of the PRC, Syswin Xing Ye shall pay RMB0.4 million to Ying Lu.

 

Corporate Governance

 

Shenzhen Syswin’s board shall consist of three members, two of which shall be appointed by Syswin Xing Ye and one of which shall be Ying Lu. Shenzhen Syswin shall pay Ying Lu a monthly director’s remuneration of RMB20,000 over one-year period commencing on February 29, 2012.

 

Representations and Warranties by Ying Lu

 

Ying Lu provides representations and warranties with respect to her ownership of 8% equity interest in the Target and such 8% equity interest being free of any encumbrances.

 

Dividend Distribution

 

Upon the effectiveness of the Agreement, Ying Lu is not entitled to any distribution to be made by the Target or the Target’s Subsidiaries. However, Ying Lu is entitled to 8% of the amount of account receivables to be collected pursuant to the equity transfer agreement between Syswin Xing Ye, Ying Lu, and Fantasia Holdings Group Co., Limited dated January 11, 2011, if such account receivables have been collected.
No. 11-6054.

#### Barbara Springs, Petitioner v. New York City Board of Education, et al.

565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1083,

181 L. Ed. 2d 802,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 456.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 983, 132 S. Ct. 507, 181 L. Ed. 2d 357, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7901.
No. 11-6949.

#### Antoine C. Buchanan, Petitioner v. Mark Nooth, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution.

565 U.S. 1097, 132 S. Ct. 854,

181 L. Ed. 2d 557,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8891.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 11-585.

#### Brand Technologies, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Mavrix Photo, Inc.

565 U.S. 1157, 132 S. Ct. 1101,

181 L. Ed. 2d 979,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 746.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 647 F.3d 1218.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00011

- CV

JOHN CORES
v. CARROLL F. LABORDE, BARBARA LABORDE AND LABORDE PROPERTIES, LP, A TEXAS LIMITED PART NERSHIP

On Appeal from the 2nd 25th District Court of Gonzales County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 25,760

JUD GMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on
appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court
orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged
against appella nt.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
June 21, 2018
************************

• MONOGRAPH NO.: 6A8

************************

ITEM: Lemon-Lime Beverage (BLL)

 Base

NSN: 8960-01-227-1720 ITEM SPECIFICATION: MIL-B-35023

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 150

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

 APPEARANCE: Dehydrated: Pale green, fine powder. Rehydrated: Bright pale

green, slightly cloudy, pulpy specks of lime throughout.

 ODOR: Sweet, lemon-lime.

 FLAVOR: Sweet, lemon-lime, slightly artificial.

 TEXTURE: Free flowing, fine powder, without lumps that cannot

be broken apart by light finger pressure.

 ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT 70 DEGREES F: 36 months

 80 DEGREES F: 30 months

 90 DEGREES F: 24 months

 100 DEGREES F: 18 months

EXPECTED DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

 APPEARANCE: Rehydrated: Coagulated, gelation, surface

frothing or cloudiness; excessive sediment significantly

affecting aesthetic appearance or flavor.

 ODOR: Burnt, scorched, moldy/mildew.

 FLAVOR: Oxidized or any other flavor not typical of the type

of beverage.

 TEXTURE: Lumpy or caked, not free flowing.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: Prepare beverage IAW package

instructions. Product should dissolve completely within about two minutes.

SPECIAL NOTES: If slight sedimentation and clouding are observed

but the odor and flavor are normal, do not score the sedimentation as a defect

during surveillance inspection; make note of it in the narrative for future

use. Coagulation/gelation may occur if the original formulation was incorrect

or if the product has been temperature abused for a long time.

Coagulation/gelation presents as clumps of granules that do not readily

dissolve when product is reconstituted. Particles tend to float in suspension

(look like gel pockets or tapioca granules that are clumped together).
No. 11-564.

#### Florida, Petitioner v. Joelis Jardines.

565 U.S. 1104, 132 S. Ct. 995,

181 L. Ed. 2d 726,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 7.

January 6, 2012.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida granted limited to Question I presented by the petition.

Same case below, 73 So. 3d 34.
Exhibit 13.1



Certification by the Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Kaixin Auto Holdings (the “Company”) on Form 20-F, as amended by Amendment No.1 on Form 20-F/A for the year ended
December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Mingjun Lin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 27, 2022



|By:    | /s/ Mingjun Lin             | 
|------ | --------------------------- | 
|Name:  | Mingjun Lin                 | 
|Title: | Principal Executive Officer |
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

Monograph No.BS2 

21 September 1992 

NSN: 8920-00-782-6353

Item: Bakery Mix, Prepared, Quick bread mixes, Pancake and Waffle, Regular (Class 2, Style 

C) 

Document: MIL-B-44275A, Bakery Mixes, Prepared 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: NA Component Classification: Secondary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 24 months at 80oF 

Item Characteristics

Appearance: 

Dry bakery mix shall be a free flowing mix free from lumps that do not fall apart under 

light finger pressure. Uniform light tan/off-white color. 

Prepared pancakes/waffles shall possess a golden tan exterior and light tan interior 

crumb. 

Odor: Prepared pancakes or waffles shall have a slightly sweet cooked pancake/waffles 

odor. 

Flavor: Prepared pancakes or waffles shall have a sweet cooked pancake/waffle flavor. May 

have a baking powder flavor. 

Texture: Dry mix shall be free flowing. 

Prepared pancakes or waffles shall be moist, tender, and show no evidence of lumps. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: 

Dry mix may darken in color and/or contain lumps that do not fall apart under light 

finger pressure. 

Prepared pancakes or waffles may be excessively flat or dense, or may be brittle and 

crack easily. 

Odor: Rancid, stale, oxidized, bitter, soapy, scorched, or other objectionable odors. 

Flavor: Rancid, stale, oxidized, bitter, soapy, scorched, or other objectionable flavors. 

Texture: 

Bakery mix may clump excessively, and not readily dissolve upon mixing or baking. 

Upon Mixing the product may not readily attain a moderately thick pancake or waffle 

batter consistency. 

Prepared pancakes or waffles may be excessively dense or gummy due to not rising. 

Monograph No. BS2, Page 1of 2 Pages 
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

Monograph No.BS2 

21 September 1992 

NSN: 8920-00-782-6353

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Prepare as directed on label. 

Monograph No. BS2, Page 2of 2 Pages
No. 11-624.

#### Attila Hegyi, Petitioner v. Washington State Department of Transportation.

565 U.S. 1158, 132 S. Ct. 1107,

181 L. Ed. 2d 980,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 728.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington denied.
[Cite as Patel v. Crawford, 133 Ohio St.3d 138, 2012-Ohio-4229.]

P ATEL ET AL ., A PPELLANTS , v. C RAWFORD , J UDGE , A PPELLEE . [Cite as Patel v. Crawford, 133 Ohio St.3d 138, 2012-Ohio-4229.] Mandamus—Petition sought to compel a judge to hear motion for sanctions— Court of appeals’ dismissal of petition for writ affirmed. (No. 2012-0728—Submitted September 12, 2012—Decided September 19, 2012.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Belmont County, Nos. 11 BE 23 and 11 BE 24, 2012-Ohio-1688.

_____________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellants, Arvind and Bharati Patel, for a writ of mandamus. The Patels sought the writ to compel appell ee, Judge Dale A. Crawford, sitting by assignment in Longwell v. Patel , Belmont C.P. No. 03-CV-036, to hear appellant Arvind Patel’s motion for sanctions “prior to presiding over the trial” in the case. 1 Appellants could not establish either a clear legal right to the requested extraordinary relief or a corresponding clear legal duty on the part of Judge Crawford to provide it because the case was dismissed before any trial could

occur. Judgment affirmed.
O’C ONNOR , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , C UPP , and M C G EE B ROWN , JJ., concur.

__________________

1. The court of appeals also dismissed appellants’ claims for a continuance, to give them time to retain counsel and to appoint a translator to aid appellant Bharati Patel at trial, but appellants do not claim any error in the court’s holding on these claims in this appeal.S UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 Arvind and Bhara ti Patel, pro se. Chris Berhalter, Belmont County Prosecuting Attorney, and David K. Liberati, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

______________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at September 30, 1999 (Unaudited)
and the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three months ended September
30, 1999 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          65,552
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,552
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 139,217
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,150
<OTHER-SE>                                     154,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   139,217
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,723
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (25,723)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,723)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 11-7433.

#### Jermaine Mathis, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1131, 132 S. Ct. 1050,

181 L. Ed. 2d 771,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 24.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
26 September 2008 ********************************* 

NSN: 8940-01-569-8614 (TCK) * MONOGRAPH NO: MCW/LRP 68 

 ********************************* 

Item: Snack Foods, Toasted Corn Kernels (Type VI) 

Document: CID A-A-20195, Snack Foods and PKQ & QAP 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 260 Component Classification: Secondary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80 F 

Item Characteristics

Appearance: 

Toasted corn kernels are prepared from whole hybrid corn kernels that have been steam 

baked/toasted and salted. Kernels are medium size (approximately 75 kernels per 

ounce) and a bright to moderate golden yellow color with salt or salt dust on the 

surface. 

Odor: Toasted corn. 

Flavor: Salty, toasted corn, slight oil. 

Texture: Crispy and lightly crunchy, but not hard. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkened yellow/brown color, wrinkled, shrunken appearance. 

Odor: Rancid, musty, painty/linseed, oxidized, low corn odor. 

Flavor: Rancid, musty, painty/linseed, oxidized, off oil, soapy, low corn flavor, plastic. 

Texture: Hard or loss of crispiness or crunchiness, very dense, oily. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

N/A 

Special Notes

This product should contain an oxygen scavenger. If defects such as oxidized or rancid odors or 

flavors exist, they are likely due to package failure or the absence of an oxygen scavenger.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6978

VICTOR MANUEL PINILLA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusTIMOTHY MALFITANO; CHIEF OF POLICE, Jacksonville, North Carolina; JOHN DOE, unknown Jacksonville Police Department personnel; HERRERA SERGIO; SELOBY STEVEN; ROBERT ALBERT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-1064-5-BR) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 17, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Victor Manuel Pinilla, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Fulton Dotson,Jr., WARLICK, MILSTED, DOTSON & CARTER, Jacksonville, North Carolina; Clay Allen Collier, CROSSLEY, MCINTOSH, PRIOR & COLLIER, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pinilla v. Malfitano , No. CA-95-1064-5-BR (E.D.N.C. May 21, 1997, June 12, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 11-7453.

#### James Nathaniel Evans, Petitioner v. Jamie Baker, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 1166, 132 S. Ct. 1113,

181 L. Ed. 2d 995,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 767.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 442 Fed. Appx. 108.
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

Monograph No. BS10 

25 September 1997 

NSN: 8920-01-079-1583

Item: Cereal, Wheat, Quick Cooking and Instant, Enriched Farina, Instant, Unflavored (Type 

I, Style B, Flavor 1) 

Document: CID A-A- 20108A, Cereals, Wheat, Quick-Cooking and Instant 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: NA Component Classification: Secondary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 24 months at 80°F 

Item Characteristics

Appearance: 

Characteristic wheat color typical of farina. Free flowing cereal shall be uniform in 

composition and appearance, free from lumps that do not fall apart under light finger 

pressure. 

Prepared cereal shall be uniform in composition and appearance and free of lumps 

that do not fall apart under light pressure. 

Odor: Dry or Prepared: Characteristic cooked wheat cereal odor. 

Flavor: Prepared: Characteristic cooked wheat cereal flavor. 

Texture: Dry product shall be free flowing. 

Prepared: Moist, granular, slightly thick cooked wheat cereal. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: 

Dry farina may darken in color and/or contain lumps that do not fall apart under light 

finger pressure. 

Prepared cereal may contain undissolved lumps. 

Odor: Rancid, stale, oxidized, bitter, soapy, scorched, or other objectionable odors. 

Flavor: Rancid, stale, oxidized, bitter, soapy, scorched, or other objectionable flavors. 

Texture: 

May clump excessively and not readily dissolve upon mixing or baking. 

Prepared cereal may not readily attain a thick creamy cooked wheat consistency and 

may contain undissolved lumps. 

Monograph No. BS10, Page 1of 2 Pages 
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

Monograph No. BS10 

25 September 1997 

NSN: 8920-01-079-1583

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Prepare as directed on label. 

Monograph No. BS10, Page 2of 2 Pages
#### The State of Florida ex rel Robert H. Anderson, etc., *Petitioner,*v. E. C. Love, as Circuit Judge, *Respondent.*

Decision Filed June 2, 1926.

*Robert H. Anderson*and *Francis P. Fleming,*for Petitioner ;

*W. J. Oven,*for Respondent E. C. Love, Judge.

*A. 11. Williams,*for Respondent TI. M. Shaw.

*1025Per Curiam.

— Rule nisi was granted in the above entitled cause upon the petition of Robert H. Anderson as acting chairman of the State Board of Law Examiners, et als., for writ of prohibition, which petition, inter alia, alleged that H. M. Shaw had applied for and sued out alternative writ of mandamus before the Circuit Judge of the Second Circiut, commanding said Board to permit him to stand the examination to be held in Tallahassee on February 15,1926, and had said writ served when said Board was in session holding an examination of applicants for admission to the Bar. Rule nisi was granted by this court addressed to the Circuit Judge issuing the alternative writ of mandamus and to the petitioner, H. M. Shaw, in whose behalf the same had been issued. Subsequently, suggestion of the death of the respondent, H. M. Shaw, has been filed in this court, which makes it necessary that the rule nisi be discharged and the proceedings dismissed.

Rule nisi discharged and proceedings dismissed:

Brown, C. J., -and .Whitfield, ■ Ellis, Terrell- and Buford, J. J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 8541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-3966]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Docket No. 08-0]


Petition of Olympus Growth Fund III, L.P. and Olympus Executive 
Fund, L.P. for Declaratory Order, Rulemaking or Other Relief; Erratum

    In the Notice of Filing of Petition for Docket 08-07, served 
December 23, 2008 and appearing in the Federal Register on January 5, 
2009 (74 FR 288), the citation in paragraph 3 is corrected to read 
``See 46 CFR 502.68(f)(2).''

Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-3966 Filed 2-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
No. 11-6861.

#### Ricardo Lamont Rusan, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1043, 132 S. Ct. 595,

181 L. Ed. 2d 437,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8172.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.