alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 1701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-401]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Initial Review 
Group Biological Aging Review Committee.
    Date: February 6, 2009.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Rm. 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20814. (Telephone 
Conference Call)
    Contact Person: Bita Nakhai, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Office, National Institute on 
Aging, Gateway Bldg., 2C-212, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20814, 301-402-7701, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4729262c2f262e2507292e2669292e2f69202831"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cba5aaa0a3aaa2a98ba5a2aae5a5a2a3e5aca4bd">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Initial Review 
Group, Neuroscience of Aging Review Committee.
    Date: March 5-6, 2009.
    Time: 4 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites Chevy Chase, 4300 Military Road, NW., 
Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: William Cruce, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute on Aging, Scientific Review 
Office, Gateway Building 2C-212, 7201 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 
20814, 301-402-7704, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91f2e3e4f2f4e6d1fff8f0bffff8f9bff6fee7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bcdfcec9dfd9cbfcd2d5dd92d2d5d492dbd3ca">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 6, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-401 Filed 1-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3232 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3232

     To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to include certain 
    individuals who work on farms or ranches as individuals who are 
 employed in public service jobs for purposes of eligibility for loan 
           forgiveness under the Federal Direct Loan program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2019

Mr. Courtney (for himself, Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania, Mr. Harder of 
California, Mr. Zeldin, Mr. Welch, Ms. Kelly of Illinois, Ms. Pingree, 
 and Mr. Delgado) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to include certain 
    individuals who work on farms or ranches as individuals who are 
 employed in public service jobs for purposes of eligibility for loan 
           forgiveness under the Federal Direct Loan program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Young Farmer Success Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN FARM AND RANCH WORKERS FOR STUDENT LOAN 
              FORGIVENESS.

    (a) Eligibility.--Section 455(m)(3)(B) of the Higher Education Act 
of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(m)(3)(B)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of clause (i);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of clause (ii) and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new clause:
                            ``(iii) a full-time job as an employee or 
                        manager of a qualified farm or ranch.''.
    (b) Definition.--Section 455(m)(3) of such Act (20 U.S.C. 
1087e(m)(3)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Qualified farm or ranch.--The term `qualified 
                farm or ranch' means, with respect to a year, a farm or 
                ranch whose earnings of gross revenue during the year 
                from the sale of agricultural products are equal to or 
                greater than--
                            ``(i) in the case of 2019, $35,000; or
                            ``(ii) in the case of any succeeding year, 
                        the amount applicable under this subparagraph 
                        for the previous year increased by the 
                        estimated percentage change in the Consumer 
                        Price Index (as determined by the Secretary, 
                        using the definition in section 478(f)) for the 
                        most recent year preceding such year.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 151 (Thursday, August 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 42014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20980]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-683-000]


Blazer Energy Corporation; Notice of Petition for Declaratory 
Order

July 31, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 22, 1998, Blazer Energy Corporation 
(Blazer), a wholly owned subsidiary of Statoil Energy, Inc., 2899 
Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314, filed a petition pursuant to 
section 385.207(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure for a declaratory order in Docket No. CP98-683-000 requesting 
that the Commission declare that certain facilities Blazer proposes to 
acquire from Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (Columbia) are 
gathering facilities exempt from Commission jurisdiction under Section 
1(b) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), all as more fully set forth in the 
petition which is on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    Concurrently with this application, Columbia filed an application, 
in Docket No. CP98-684-000 (i) to abandon, by sale to Blazer, certain 
certificated facilities designated as Lines KA-7, KA-12, KA-13, and the 
Carbon Compressor Station, located in West Virginia; (ii) to abandon 
the services provided through the facilities to be sold; and (iii) to 
abandon a point of exchange with CNG Transmission Corporation and 
permission to amend Columbia's Exchange Agreement X-35 to remove that 
point.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said petition should on or before August 21, 1998, file 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in 
accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214) and the regulations 
under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the 
Commission will be considered by it in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party in any proceeding 
herein must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
Commission's rules.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20980 Filed 8-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
20 November 2014 **********************

NSN: 8955-01-538-0705 (CIM) * MONOGRAPH M7S1

 ********************** 

Item: Flavored instant cappuccino, Regular, Mocha

Document: A-A-20336, Drink Mixes, Coffee (Unflavored and Flavored) and PKG&QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 120 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Dehydrated product: Fine grained, well-blended homogenous mixture. Pale tan and 

dark brown color combination.

Hydrated product: Smooth and free of discernible lumps and sedimentation. Medium 

cream brown color with a layer of milky white froth on top.

Odor:

Dehydrated product: Characteristic of mocha instant cappuccino.

Hydrated product: Strong sweetened coffee with cream.

Flavor: Characteristic of mocha instant cappuccino.

Texture:

Dehydrated product: Free flowing and free of lumps.

Hydrated product: Completely disperse in hot or cold water with constant stirring or 

shaking, and free of undissolved floating particles.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance:

Dehydrated product: Caked or lumpy, darkened areas. Off colors. 

Hydrated product: Darkened color, settling or undissolved particles.

Odor: Decreased mocha cappuccino odor. Rancid. Cooked or scorched milk.

Flavor: Decreased mocha cappuccino odor. Rancid. Cooked or scorched milk. 

Texture:

Dehydrated product: Caked or lumpy (see Special Notes). 

Hydrated product: Particles fail to disperse in hot or cold water.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Initial examination should be done in the dry state. Final examination should be done after 

reconstituting. Even if caked in the dry state it should be reconstituted for future reference.

Special Notes

Dehydrated product may contain lumps which are of no concern provided they break or fall apart under 

light finger pressure. Dark brown specs may become larger as more moisture is absorbed into the 

product.
No. 11-7225.

#### Ronald J. Gardner, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1127, 132 S. Ct. 1036,

181 L. Ed. 2d 763,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 26.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 429 Fed. Appx. 188.
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John P. Thornton, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of NorPac Technologies, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006, and to which this
      certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                              

| | By:    | /s/ John P. Thornton             
| | ------ | ---------------------------------
| |        |                                  
| | Name:  | JOHN P. THORNTON                 
| |        |                                  
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief
| |        | Financial Officer                
| |        |                                  
| | Date:  | November 20, 2006                

A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
No. 11-7335.

#### Jamal Stephens, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1128, 132 S. Ct. 1040,

181 L. Ed. 2d 765,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 322.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 437 Fed. Appx. 308.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3519 

To direct the Secretary of Education to develop a common manual for 

loan servicers to ensure quality of practice and increase borrower satisfaction. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2019 

Ms. SCHRIER (for herself, Mr. ALLRED, Mr. CASTEN of Illinois, and Ms. 

KENDRA S. HORN of Oklahoma) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Education to develop a common 

manual for loan servicers to ensure quality of practice 

and increase borrower satisfaction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Better Service to Bor5 rowers Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIRING A COMMON MANUAL FOR SERVICERS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part G of title IV of the Higher 

8 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1088 et seq.) is amend9 ed by adding at the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3519 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 493E. REQUIRING A COMMON MANUAL FOR LOAN 

2 SERVICERS. 

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the 

4 date of enactment of the Better Service to Borrowers of 

5 2019, the Secretary shall develop a manual of common 

6 procedures and policies for entities with which the Sec7 retary enters into contracts for the origination, servicing, 

8 and collection of covered loans to standardize procedures 

9 to ensure consistency of quality and practice across loan 

10 servicers, and a minimum standard of quality and practice 

11 to ensure that borrowers are well-served. 

12 ‘‘(b) UPDATES.—The Secretary shall update the 

13 manual under subsection (a) as frequently as may be nec14 essary, but not less frequently than every 5 years. 

15 ‘‘(c) COVERED LOANS DEFINED.—The term ‘covered 

16 loans’ means— 

17 ‘‘(1) loans sold or assigned to the Secretary 

18 under part B; 

19 ‘‘(2) loans made or purchased under part D; 

20 and 

21 ‘‘(3) loans referred, transferred, or assigned to 

22 the Secretary under part E.’’. 

23 (b) PART D LOANS.—Section 456(a)(2) of the High24 er Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087f(a)(2)) is 

25 amended in the first sentence by inserting before the pe26 riod at the end the following: ‘‘, including the applicable 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3519 IH

1 procedures and policies described in the manual developed 

2 under section 493E’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
1

MODULAR OPERATIONAL RATIONS ENHANCEMENT (MORE) Menus

MORE–HIGH ALTITUDE/COLDWEATHER

Weight Per Pack: 0.75 lbs/.34 kg 

Procurement Data: 24/case NSN:

8970-01-581-2505

PACK 1

Caffeinated chocolate pudding, Nut and fruit mix

(Type II), Toaster pastry, Energy gel (Mixed berry), Cheese

filled pretzels

Nutrition: 1160 cal, 162 g carb, 20 g pro, 48 g fat

PACK 2

First StrikeTM bar (chocolate), Nut and fruit mix (Type II),

Toasted corn kernels, Energy gel (lemon lime),

Carbohydrate fortified beverage, Smoked Beef Snack ,

Caffeinated gum (cinnamon).

Nutrition: 1340 cal, 194 g carb, 30 g pro, 49 g fat

PACK 3

Cracker, Cheddar potato bacon soup spread,

Zapplesauce®, Baked snack cracker, Mini First StrikeTM bar

(mocha), Carbohydrate fortified beverage

Nutrition: 1130 cal, 164 g carb, 14 g pro, 46 g fat

MORE – HOT WEATHER

Weight Per Pack: 0.75 lbs/.34 kg 

Procurement Data: 24/case NSN:

8970-01-599-4327

PACK 1

Caffeinated chocolate pudding, Dried cranberries,

Energy gel (mixed berry), Cheddar cheese filled pretzels,

Carbohydrate electrolyte beverage (×2)

Nutrition: 1000 cal, 200 g carb, 7.5 g pro, 19 g fat

PACK 2

First StrikeTM bar (chocolate), Zapplesauce®, Energy gel

(lemon lime), Smoked almonds, Caffeinated gum

(peppermint), Carbohydrate electrolyte beverage (×2)

Nutrition: 910 cal, 168 g carb, 7 g pro, 23 g fat

PACK 3

Mini First StrikeTM bar (mocha w/caffeine), Cinnamon

Zapplesauce®, Energy gel (orange), Nut and fruit mix

(Type II), Toasted corn kernels, Carbohydrate electrolyte

beverage (×2)

Nutrition: 1030 cal, 185 g carb, 10 g pro, 27 g fat
No. 11-5112.

#### Joseph Emanuel, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 890, 132 S. Ct. 270,

181 L. Ed. 2d 159,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5371.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 760.
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3860 STANDARD 28.79 -0.45 13.16

Tolerance

1 3860A BLUE-GREEN 

LIMIT 28.82 -0.92 11.63 0.03 -0.47 -1.53 1.30

2 3860B THIN GREEN 

LIMIT 29.29 -1.11 12.82 0.50 -0.66 -0.34 0.90

3 3860C GREEN LIMIT 29.08 -0.76 12.95 0.29 -0.31 -0.21 0.45

4 3860D THIN YELLOW 

LIMIT 31.04 -0.79 14.93 2.25 -0.34 1.77 1.98

5 3860E YELLOW LIMIT 29.96 -0.44 14.01 1.17 0.01 0.85 0.98

6

7

8

9

DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT January 1, 2018

Fabric Nomenclature

Shade Number OLIVE GREEN 118 Piece/Roll Number 3860

BLANKET, BED, WOOL A-A-55188A

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF
No. 11-6147.

#### John Ernest Dade, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the District of Idaho.

565 U.S. 938, 132 S. Ct. 447,

181 L. Ed. 2d 252,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7253.

October 11, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
No. 11-5664.

#### Michael R. Ochoa, Petitioner v. Erin Rubin.

565 U.S. 1037, 132 S. Ct. 575,

181 L. Ed. 2d 425,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8249,

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Office, denied.

Same case below, 15 A.3d 540.
***************************** 

 * MONOGRAPH: FPS/LR 03 

 ***************************** 

ITEM: Candy, Hard, Fruit Tablets, 1 oz/tablet (Type IV, Style A) 

ITEM SPECIFICATION: CID A-A-20177 

NSN: 8925-00-823-7101 

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE: 211 kilocalories 

CHARACTERISTICS:

APPEARANCE: 

Small Square pieces of hard candy, of various translucent colors, wrapped in cellophane. 

ODOR: 

Slight sweet,; fruit (lime, orange, cherry, grape and lemon), slight cellophane from 

packaging. 

FLAVOR: 

Sweet, fruity (lime, orange, cherry, grape and lemon), slight sour. 

 

TEXTURE: 

Hard candy, smooth surface, sugar crystal, brittle. 

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

APPEARANCE: 

Darkening of colors, sticks to cellophane. 

ODOR: 

No fruit odor or non-food fruit odor (perfume). 

 

FLAVOR: 

Lack of fruit flavor or flavor not matching the color, low sweet. 

TEXTURE: 

Gummy exterior, crumbly. 

 

*SPECIAL NOTES: 

 Pieces tend to stick to wrapper after long periods of storage. Do not score as a texture 

defect unless it affects the product’s use (unable to remove cellophane).
### SERVED JULY22, 2010 

# or U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

. WASHINGTON, D.C.

INTHE MATTEROF ROSLYNE MARIE ELDER, 

### Respondent. FAADOCKETNO. CPIOSW0004 DMS NO. FAA-2010-031S

HEARING NOTICE PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the hearing in this case will be held on

### August12,2010, beginning at 10:00 a.m., local time at the following location: Alan Bible Federal Building 600 Las Vegas Building, South Room 690 Las Vegas NV 89101 Allow time to pass through security.

Administrative LawJudge Attachment-Service ListFAA DOCKET NO. CP10SW0004 (Civil Penalty Action)

SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COpy Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building-Suite2W1000 1 

### ONE COpy Edward A. Lopez, 

### Respondent 's Former Counsel Venture Corporate Center 3440 Hollywood Blvd. Suite415 Hollywood, FL 33021 TEL: 954-241-4205 FAX: 954-241-4206 Roslyne Marie Elder, 

### Respondent 835 Sierra Vista Drive,Apt. 326 Las Vegas, NY 89169 TEL: 702-412-5640 Yolandia Ayala Bernal, 

### Complainant's Counsel Safety Enforcement Branch Office ofthe Regional Counsel SouthwestRegion, ASW-7E3, YAB Federal Aviation Administration 2601 MeachamBlvd., Room 663 Fort Worth, TX 76137-0007 TEL: 817-222-5070 FAX: 817-222-5945/5092



### .--

________**--1...ne...l:1.OJo.orame..lsaa&11.l?~Jlkin,Administrative** 

### Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20
. U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue,S.E. East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 Washington, DC 20590 TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 Legal Assistant 202-366-2132 FAX: 202-366-7536

I Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person 01' by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WlOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.