alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Date: 16 August 2023 *******************

NSN: 8920-01-709-1640 (MLC) MONOGRAPH 3D5

 ******************* 

Item: Mini Loaves and Muffins, Cornbread, Type I, Flavor 3

Document: PCR-M-018, Mini Loaves and Muffins, Packaged in a Polymeric Tray, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 256 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Fully baked, intact, individual, rectangular loaf, golden yellow to tan exterior color. 

Light to medium yellow interior crumb color with irregular crumb appearance. 

Dimensions not less than 3 inches long by 1-2/5 inches wide. The interior crumb may 

have air pockets distributed throughout. Height measured at highest point shall be not 

less than 1-1/4 inch. 

Odor: Slightly sweet, mild corn.

Flavor: Slightly sweet, mild corn. 

Texture: Dense, tender, and moist with a coarse grain crumb.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkening color of interior and exterior.

Odor: Oxidized, musty.

Flavor: Oxidized, musty.

Texture: Dry.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Special Notes
16 July 2014 ************************

NSN: 8940-01-620-9418 (BSBS) * MONOGRAPH M2B30 

 ************************ 

Item: Beef, Shredded, in barbecue sauce

Document: PCR-B-057, Beef, Shredded, in Barbecue Sauce, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf 

Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 300 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Uniform mixture of cooked shredded beef in a barbecue sauce.

Beef: Whole muscle beef with visible natural striated muscle fiber structure.

Sauce: Reddish-brown color, opaque, smooth, and glossy.

Odor: Beef: Cooked beef seasoned with barbecue sauce.

Sauce: Smoky, sweet and sour barbecue.

Flavor: Beef: Cooked beef seasoned with barbecue sauce.

Sauce: Smoky, sweet and sour barbecue.

Texture:

Beef: Firm, tender, not excessively dry. Natural striated muscle fiber structure breaks 

apart with ease.

Sauce: Smooth and moderately thick.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Sauce: Excessively darkened sauce, oil separation, excessively thick or thin sauce.

Odor: Loss of smoky, sweet and sour barbecue. 

Flavor: Scorched, bitter, excessive loss of smoky, sweet and sour barbecue.

Texture: Beef: Rubbery or dry. 

Sauce: Excessively thick, dry and/or pasty. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

NA
No. 11-6208.

#### Patrick McPherron, Petitioner v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission.

565 U.S. 1016, 132 S. Ct. 553,

181 L. Ed. 2d 400,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7986.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.

Same case below, 77 So. 3d 1260.
No. 11-7575.

#### Neal John Tibbs, Petitioner v. D. Adams, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 1135, 132 S. Ct. 1061,

181 L. Ed. 2d 778,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 348.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 441 Fed. Appx. 443.
Exhibit 32.1



SigmaRenoPro, Inc.

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

Section 906 Certifications



In connection with the Annual Report of SigmaRenoPro,
Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2022 (the “Report”) I, Ronald Jones, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge and belief:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
  Act of 1934; and                             
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



This Certification is signed on November 30,
2023.



|SigmaRenoPro, Inc.                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                    
|By: /s/ Ronald Jones                                                                                                
|Ronald Jones,                                                                                                       
|Chief Executive Officer, (principal executive officer, principal accounting officer and principal financial officer)



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



The forgoing certification is being furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
DENT 

Table IV, Defect No. 110 – Lower limit of a major defect. End 

seam pulled out of position to such an extent that the 

malposition is readily noticeable at first glance. There is some 

suspicion that the end seam had been placed under tension 

sufficient to jeopardize the hermetic seal (major defect). 

Moderately deep, sharp, angular indentation with moderately acute 

crimping of the body wall (minor defect).
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30708 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANDREW CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 00-CR-10002-3

- - - - - - - - - - April 11, 2002 Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Andrew Christopher Johnson appeals his sentence for unlawful use of a communication facility in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b). He argues that his sentence should be vacated because the $20,000 fine imposed by the district court is excessive. Johnson did not raise this issue before the district court. Therefore, we review for plain error. United States v. Rodriguez , 15 F.3d 408, 414-15 (5th Cir. 1994). We do not find that plain error has been established. See United States v. Altamirano , 11 F.3d 52, 53 (5th Cir. 1993); United States v. Matovsky , 935 F.2d 719, 722-23 (5th Cir. 1991).No. 01-30708 -2-
AFFIRMED.
SUBSTITUTION REQUEST TEMPLATE

USE COMPANY LETTERHEAD FOR REQUEST DATE: ______________

Subject: Substitution request for [COMPONENT NAME]

01 New Substitution Request: ☐ Extension Of Previous Request: ☐ (Provide a copy of original 

approval letter) 

02 Ration Type (MRE, FSR, MCW, etc.): ________________________________________________

03 Component for Which Substitution Is Required: _________________________________________

04 Provide Detailed Information to Justify the Request (Sufficient to support an Engineering Support 

Case): __________________________________________________________________________

05 Substitution Quantity Required: _____________________________________________________

06 Time Period for Substitution: ________________________________________________________

07 Which Menu Number(s) Will the Substitution Be Used In? ________________________________

08 Number of Affected Menus: ________________________________________________________

09 Number of Affected Cases: _________________________________________________________

10 Proposed Substitution(s): ___________________________________________________________

Note 1: Provide nutritional information (preferably a copy of the Nutrition Facts label from the package) for the 

component that the substitution is required for as well as any proposed substitution. At a minimum, calories, 

fat, protein, carbohydrates, and sodium information is required) 

Thank you,

Point of Contact Info with phone number and email address
No. 11-7075.

#### Percy Allen Williams, Petitioner v. Graham C. Mullen, et al.

565 U.S. 1123, 132 S. Ct. 1025,

181 L. Ed. 2d 755,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 132.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 434 Fed. Appx. 172.
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to AnnualReport on Form 10-K/A of Andover National Corporation. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Milun K. Patel,Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

 

Date: April 30, 2020

 

Milun K. Patel	

Chief Financial Officer	

Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
16 January 2013 ***********************************

NSN: 8960-01-527-8228 (CBPH) *MONOGRAPH NO: MCW/LRP 42 A *

***********************************

Item: Cocoa beverage powder, Sugar sweetened, Without marshmallows, Chocolate hazelnut, 

Flat interlocking closure pouch (Type I, Style B, Flavor F, Design B)

Document: CID A-A-20189, Cocoa Beverage Powder and PKG&QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 150 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Powdered product: Well-blended homogenous mixture, free of lumps, light to medium 

brown.

Hydrated product: Well-blended, uniform consistency without floating, agglomerated 

cocoa particles; light to medium brown; disperse readily in hot or cold water.

Odor: Powdered product: Cocoa and sweet milk solids.

Hydrated product: Sweet milk chocolate, hazelnut cream-like.

Flavor: Powdered product: Cocoa and sweet milk solids.

Hydrated product: Sweet milk chocolate, hazelnut cream-like.

Texture: Powdered product: Free flowing and fine.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Powdered product: Caking, lumpiness, darkened areas. Off colors.

Hydrated product: Darkened color, settling or undissolved material.

Odor: Decreased cocoa and hazelnut odor. Rancid. Cooked or scorched milk. Bitter chocolate.

Flavor: Decreased cocoa and hazelnut flavor. Rancid. Cooked or scorched milk. Bitter 

chocolate.

Texture: Powdered product: Caked or lumpy (see Special Notes). 

Hydrated product: Particles fail to disperse in hot or cold water.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Initial examination should be done in the dry state. Final examination should be done after 

reconstituting. Even if caked in the dry state it should be reconstituted for future reference.

Special Notes

Product may contain lumps which are of no concern provided they break or fall apart under light finger 

pressure. Dark brown specs may become larger as more moisture is absorbed into the product.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 149 (Tuesday, August 4, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 41589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20752]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Concession Contract Negotiations; Delaware Water Gap National 
Recreation Area, Bushkill, PA; Campground

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Public notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Public notice is hereby given that the National Park Service 
proposes to award a concession contract authorizing the operation of a 
125-site campground for the public within Delaware Water Gap National 
Recreation Area, Bushkill, PA for a period of ten (10) years from date 
of contract execution.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 12, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties should contact National Park Service, 
Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area, Bushkill, PA 18324, or 
phone (717) 588-2440, to obtain a copy of the prospectus describing the 
requirements of the proposed contract.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This contract has been determined to be 
categorically excluded from the procedural provisions of the National 
Environmental Policy Act and no environmental document will be 
prepared.
    The existing concessioner has performed its obligations to the 
satisfaction of the Secretary under an existing concession permit which 
expired on December 31, 1991, and therefore pursuant to the provisions 
of Section 5 of the Act of October 9, 1965 (79 Stat. 969; 16 U.S.C. 
Sec. 20), is entitled to be given preference in the renewal of the 
contract and in the negotiation of a new contract, providing that the 
existing concessioner submits a responsive offer (a timely offer which 
meets the terms and conditions of the Prospectus). This means that the 
contract will be awarded to the party submitting the best offer, 
provided that if the best offer was not submitted by the existing 
concessioner, then the existing concessioner will be afforded the 
opportunity to match the best offer. If the existing concessioner 
agrees to match the best offer, then the contact will be awarded to the 
existing concessioner.
    If the existing concessioner does not submit a responsive offer, 
the right of preference in renewal shall be considered to have been 
waived, and the contract will then be awarded to the party that has 
submitted the best responsive offer.
    The Secretary will consider and evaluate all proposals received as 
a result of this notice. Any proposal, including that of the existing 
concessioner, must be received by the Superintendent, Delaware National 
Recreation Area, not later than the one hundred (100) days following 
publication of this notice to be considered and evaluated.

    Dated: July 28, 1998.
William G. Laitner,
Superintendent, Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area.
[FR Doc. 98-20752 Filed 8-3-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First National Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2003 (the "Report"), I,
Glen W. Fausset, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Glen W. Fausset

Glen W. Fausset
President and Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2003
NSN: 8940 01 557 4038 

Item: Hoppin’ John (Seasoned Black Eye Peas) (HOP) MONOGRAPH NO: 1B10 

Document: PCR- H014 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 163.5 kcals Component Classification: Primary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80 degrees F, 6 months at 100 degrees F 

Item Characteristics

Appearance: 

Shall be cooked black eye peas in a sauce consisting of chopped cooked bacon, diced 

green bell peppers, diced celery, diced onion, and seasonings. The sauce shall be 

smooth, glossy, golden brown/green (from the veggies) and moderately thick. 

Odor: Shall have an odor of cooked black eye peas, slightly smoky bacon, and green bell 

pepper with savory seasoning notes. 

Flavor: Shall have a flavor of cooked black eye peas, slightly smoky bacon, green bell pepper, 

and onion in a mildly spiced savory seasoned sauce. 

Texture: 

Beans shall have a slightly firm, tender, mealy bean texture. Bacon shall have a slight 

tender chew/bite. The vegetables shall be tender and moist. The sauce shall be smooth 

and moderately thick. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Mushy, darkened/scorched, thickened sauce or thinned out sauce with evidence of 

syneresis, development of pasty appearance 

Odor: Sour, bitter, intensified green bell pepper odor, excessive smokiness, scorched 

Flavor: Sour, bitter (intensified green bell pepper), low flavor, metallic, increased red spice 

note or loss of spice heat, scorched 

Texture: Mushy, softened black eye peas, dried out/pasty or thinned sauce with evidence of 

syneresis, mushy vegetables 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         IN CONNECTION WITH THE QUARTERLY REPORT OF CONOCO INC. (THE "COMPANY")
ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 2002 AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON THE DATE HEREOF (THE "REPORT"), I, ARCHIE W. DUNHAM,
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE COMPANY, CERTIFY, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,
THAT:

(1)      THE REPORT FULLY COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13(a) OR
         15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934; AND

(2)      THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE REPORT FAIRLY PRESENTS, IN ALL
         MATERIAL RESPECTS, THE FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF
         THE COMPANY.


      /s/ ARCHIE W. DUNHAM
----------------------------------
NAME:  ARCHIE W. DUNHAM
TITLE: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
No. 11-259.

#### Edward H. Flint, Petitioner v. Churchill Downs Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 978, 132 S. Ct. 509,

181 L. Ed. 2d 348,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7762.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 11-7368.

#### Brian Lakeith Rowe, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1129, 132 S. Ct. 1043,

181 L. Ed. 2d 767,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 107.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 437 Fed. Appx. 800.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 147 (Friday, July 31, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40910-40911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20488]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1220-DR]


North Dakota; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of North Dakota (FEMA-1220-DR), dated June 15, 1998, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 20, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that in a letter 
dated July 20, 1998, the President amended the incident type for this 
disaster to include severe storms.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public

[[Page 40911]]

Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard 
Mitigation Grant Program)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-20488 Filed 7-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
No. 10-760.

#### Madeline Weishuhn, Petitioner v. Catholic Diocese of Lansing, et al.

565 U.S. 1155, 132 S. Ct. 1088,

181 L. Ed. 2d 976,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 865.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.

Same case below, 287 Mich. App. 211, 787 N.W.2d 513.
ITEM: Sugar (SUG) MONOGRAPH NO.:

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE: 24 Kilocalories.

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: White, free flowing, fine or extra fine granules.

ODOR: Typical of commercial product.
FLAVOR: Typical of commercial product.
TEXTURE: Free-flowing granules.

DEFECTS LIKELY TO OCCUR:

APPEARANCE: Not white or free-flowing.

ODOR: Any objectionable/nontypical odor (e.g. musty).
FLAVOR: Any objectionable flavor (e.g. musty).
TEXTURE: Caked or lumped (see Special Notes).

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: Initially examine in dry state for appearance
and texture. If product is caked or lumed in dry state, examine the package closely for cuts, tears,
holes, or open seals. Shake package vigorously ten times and observe for minute quantities of

product that may sift out of package especially at the juncture of seams and the folded edge of the

package. The defect is appropriately called a sifter.

SPECIAL NOTES: Lumps that break apart under light pressure, (i.e. pressed between the fingers

gently) are of no concern.

60

KF4
No. 10-10416.

#### Ali Partovi, Petitioner v. Joseph P. Galoski, et al.

565 U.S. 1074, 132 S. Ct. 802,

181 L. Ed. 2d 513,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8437.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 836, 132 S. Ct. 141, 181 L. Ed. 2d 60, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5239.
MIL-C-40004C

ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 18080 STANDARD 55.90 -0.99 -1.23

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

DLA/NAVY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT April 19, 2018

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, KNITTED, SIMPLEX, COTTON

Shade Number GREY 3129 Piece/Roll Number 18080