alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit10-3_2.htm


Exhibit 10.3.2


AGREEMENT REGARDING GRANTS OF INCENTIVE SHARES AND CLAWBACKS












This Agreement between East West Bancorp, Inc. (“Company”) and the employee referenced below (“Employee”) is entered into as of this 9th day of April, 2012 by and between Company and Employee.







Employee has outstanding stock options, restricted stock and / or restricted stock units of the Company that may vest upon a change in control of the Company.   Employee agrees that no such shares shall vest by reason of a change in control of the Company unless the Employee is terminated or unless Employee’s job is materially changed.  Employee’s job shall be considered materially changed if compensation is reduced, if duties are materially reduced, or if Employee’s principal place of employment is moved more than 25 miles from Pasadena, California.







In addition, Employee agrees that for any existing restricted stock and restricted stock units that Employee currently holds where the vesting is subject to performance metrics, the shares will be subject to “claw back” in event of a restatement of the financial statement on which the shares vesting is based. Employee shall be required to repay the Company the amount of the shares value in excess of what would have been paid based on the restated numbers. The claw back shall be required without regard to the reason for the restatement.







Except as expressly agreed to herein, the Employment Agreement between the parties shall remain in force and effect.







EAST WEST BANCORP, INC.







By: _________________________












____________________________


Employee: Douglas Krause
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 142 (Friday, July 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19769]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-355-000]


Chandeleur Pipe Line Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

July 20, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 16, 1998, Chandeleur Pipe Line Company 
(Chandeleur), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with an 
effective date of August 1, 1988:

Second Revised Sheet No. 43
Original Sheet No. 43A
Third Revised Sheet No. 69
First Revised Sheet No. 69A

    Chandeleur states that revised tariff sheets are being filed in 
compliance with the Commission's Order No. 597-G, issued April 16, 1998 
in the above-referenced docket. Chandeleur states that the tariff 
sheets are being made effective August 1, 1998, in order to implement 
the GISB Standards adopted under Order No. 587-G.
    Chandeleur states that it is serving copies of the filing to its 
customers, State Commissions and interested parties.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19769 Filed 7-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

flyou make changes to !he \'Glues in the table below. you must ensure tlze totals update accordingly. (/' 

!hey do not, click (or Tab) into a11d then ouL (?[!he changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

replacement) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost 

Do not include on- (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet 

condition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Inspection I '.: 

20.5 $0 ·: .•. ..., 42. ~{) 165 ' . I i 

) 

... 0.\l(l ' ' O.fHI ' ! I 

O.iJ{) ( o on 'I 

li ')[) ~ t) (Ill I 'II 

() .t=•l ' 0 .(11) !I,,, 

' . l ')(} \ ·'·' () tt() ! '· 

" ll fJu lj flj J ' tl ' 

1).00 0 ljl l -:) \1 

il .()ll \ (J 110 '' un \ q (Jji ~ lJ.OU '· II Pi.\ 

0.1\i) ' O.OlJ ' 'I II() 

', n t.lO " 0.00 I '\ f l I ~I \ 

" ll.(JO s 0. ()() \, 1.1 (10 

O.t)O ., 0 (H) j ' i) . l(t 

\ 1).()(1 \ () 1)(\ ~; 11 ''ri) 

' II 011 .; rl HI \ {) Ill 

1).{)(1 (' ·,q ' I I (II' 

~ I) (!{! ( IJ.I,l( l II , ;fj 

(, ,·,, , I J.JII f• rro 

I) ,(I( 1 ' () (II) ' I . (I(J 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $287,513 

Costs covered under wan-an tv (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: ~ 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

testing, and close- replacement) up) 

\ ! ()() \ 0 (llj 

·:- o.co ', .. l,(iO 

:-., (J.OO ~. l !Ill 

s fJ Uil ' \ ) q; 

Special considerations fot· Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 
Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?~ 

YES* D NO j:gl 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? • 

YES* D NO j:gl 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. 0 

YES D NO j:gl 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specitic requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? ~ 

YES* D NO j:gl 

*Explanation:
# C_2018086EN.01015401.xml

| 6.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/154 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/154

---

P8_TA(2016)0245

Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors — Rimantas Šadžius

European Parliament decision of 7 June 2016 on the nomination of Rimantas Šadžius as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C8-0126/2016 — 2016/0805(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2018/C 086/28)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0126/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0126/2016),

| — | having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0183/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0183/2016),

| A. | whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

| B. | whereas at its meeting of 23 May 2016 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

B.

whereas at its meeting of 23 May 2016 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors;

| 1. | Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Rimantas Šadžius as a Member of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Rimantas Šadžius as a Member of the Court of Auditors;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 19, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-31132 Conference Calendar

VINCENT MARK CASTILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus MELISSA HEBERT, Parole Officer; MICHAEL MCNULTY, Judge; JOE ROBERTS, Assistant District Attorney; HARRY LEE; UNIDENTIFIED PARTIES, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-CV-792

-------------------- Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Vincent Mark Castillo, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis , appeals the dismissal with prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Castillo does not challenge the district court’s reasons for dismissing his claims against the various defendants related to the probation revocation proceedings. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). He merely reiterates his assertion that he was never actually onNo. 02-31132 -2-

** Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477 (1994). probation and that the revocation proceeding was thus unlawful. Thus, Castillo has abandoned any challenge to the district court’s reasons for dismissing his claims concerning the probation revocation proceeding. See id. Liberally construed, Castillo’s brief contains an assertion that the district court erred in dismissing his claims with prejudice after he sought leave to withdraw them until such time

as the Heck ** conditions were met. Castillo has not shown that the district court erred in dismissing his claims with prejudice. Boyd v. Biggers , 31 F.3d 279, 282-84 (5th Cir. 1994). To the extent that Castillo seeks habeas corpus relief with respect to his probation revocation proceeding, this appeal from the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint is not the proper forum within which to seek such relief. Castillo’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Castillo is cautioned that future frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. He is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1092

MARIE THERESE ASSA’AD-FALTAS, MD, MPH, for herself and classes she 

represents,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, South Carolina’s Governor; and any and all of 

their necessary agents; each solely in his official capacity and solely for prospective 

relief; ALAN M. WILSON, SC Attorney General; and any and all of their necessary 

agents; each solely in his official capacity and solely for prospective relief; JAY 

LUCAS, or his successor, SC House Speaker; and any and all of their necessary 

agents; each solely in his official capacity and solely for prospective relief; 

DONALD W. BEATTY, SC Chief Justice; and any and all of their necessary agents; 

each solely in his official capacity and solely for prospective relief,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (3:20-cv-01809-TLW)

Submitted: July 20, 2021 Decided: July 22, 2021

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas appeals the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice, after a review 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, Assa’ad-Faltas’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action.*

 We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Assa’ad-Faltas v. McMaster, No. 3:20-cv-01809-TLW (D.S.C. 

Dec. 18, 2020). We deny Assa’ad-Faltas’ motion to place this appeal in abeyance. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court dismissed Assa’ad-Faltas’ action without prejudice, we 

have jurisdiction over this appeal. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC, 959 F.3d 605, 612 (4th Cir. 

2020), cert. denied, 141 S. Ct. 1376 (2021).
BRIGADIER GENERAL ATTILO PEDROLI

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE (RET) 

Is inducted into the Defense Industrial Supply Center Hall of Fame this twentieth day of January 

1999 for his extraordinary leadership and support as DISC’s 12th Commander from July 1979 to 

June 1981. General Pedroli’s extraordinary leadership, exceptional insight, management skills and 

logistics expertise enhanced both customer support and the readiness posture of our armed forces 

worldwide. He implemented many initiatives to improve the quality and timeliness of DISC’s 

support to its customers. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/pedroli.htm 1/21/2016
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 1750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-410]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11525 and <greek-i>11526]


Missouri Disaster Number MO-00033

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Missouri (FEMA-1809-DR), dated 11/13/
2008.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, and a Tornado.
    Incident Period: 09/11/2008 through 09/24/2008.
    Effective Date: 12/19/2008.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/12/2009.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 08/13/2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration for the State of Missouri, dated 11/13/2008 is hereby 
amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the 
disaster:

Primary County: (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):Montgomery.
    All other counties contiguous to the above named primary county 
have previously been declared.

Contiguous Counties: (Economic Injury Loans Only): All other 
information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-410 Filed 1-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

STATE OF CONNECTICUT and THE TOWN OF WALLINGFORD DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDERNO. 8141 MODIFICATION

TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDER MODIFICATION In the manee ofa Trading Agreement and Order between the Commissioner ofEnvironmental**Prot~ction** 

### ("Commissioner") and the TOwn vfWallingford Depart
....nent ofPublic Utilities ("Wallingford DPU"). WHEREAS, the Commissioner and Wallingford DPU, having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading Agreement and Order No. 8141 issued on December 31, 1996, do now, by mutual agreement, modifY paragraphs B.I., B.l.d.,B.l.e., B.l.g., B.2. and B.8. as follows: 1. Change the date specified in paragraph B.1. from May I, 1999 to May 1,2003. 

### 2. Change the dates specified in paragraph B.I.d. from "October 3D, 1997. 

### and 1998," to "October 30,1999,2000,2001 and 

### 2002,". 3. Change the dates specified in paragraph B.l.e. from "January 3I, 1997, 1998, 1999, and 

### 2000" to "January 31,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003, and 

### 2004,". 4. Replace paragraph B.l.g. as follows: No later than March I, 1999,2000,2001, 2002,2003, and 2004, include with its annal emissions report to the Commissioner, ERCs used (calculated as described above by ozone and non-ozone seasons), for the previous calendar year; 5. Change the date specified in paragraph 8.2. from May I, 1999 to May 1,2003. 6. Change the date specified in paragraph 8.8. from May I, 1999 to May I, 

### 2003. All other tenns and conditions ofTrading Agreement and OrderNo. 8141 issued by the Commissioner acting under Sections 22a·6, 22a-171, 22a·174, 22a-176, 22a·177 and 22a-178 of the Connecticut General Statutes shall remain iii effect.

/? .- Initials: r) -(.'-c- (Priolcd DO Rccyclcd Paper) 79 Elm SUCCI • HUlford, CT 06106

- SI27 hi:p:lldep.Slalc.cun .","" Equal Oppoflu"iry E",ployu Date: .:)" 

# /n

### THETOWN OF WALLINGFORD DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES 2 

### TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDERNO. 8141 MODIFICATION

The Town ofWallingford 

### Deparunent ofPublic 

### Utilities hereby consents to the entry ofthis 

### modification to the Trading Agreementand Order without furthernotice. 

### The Town ofWallingford Departmentof Public Utilities 

### S·

# .~

19narure:**....J...'----'I"''9'~'-'''-_'"..L:''''-** __.Lj''-- 

### Type Name: Type Title: Date: Director - Public Utilities March 15. 1999 

### Entered as amodification ofan Order ofthe CommissionerofEnvironmental Protection numbered 

### 8141 this 

# 21 dayof

# ¥ 1999.

rthur 1. Rocque, 

### Jr. Commissioner 

### TOWN OF WALLINGFORD LAND RECORDS MAILED CERTIFIED MAlL,

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Certified DocumentNo.
03 October 2006 ************************

NSN: 8920-01-545-1813 (BPSS) * MONOGRAPH FS5 – 02

 ************************

Item: Bagel, Shelf Stable, Plain (Type I)

Document: MIL-DTL-32219, Bagel, Shelf Stable, For Operational Rations

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 160 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 2 years @ 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Round. Has an open center. Crust: uniform brown baked bread color without being 

excessively light or dark. Crumb: white to off white color.

Odor: Boiled/steamed and baked dough fermented by yeast.

Flavor: Dough fermented by yeast and slightly sweet.

Texture: Not excessively dry, crumbly, or excessively moist and gummy.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkened crumb, darkened surface.

Odor: Rancid, oxidized, excessively sour, and stale.

Flavor: Rancid, oxidized, excessively sour, and stale.

Texture: Firm bite, dry and crumbly.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

This product should contain an oxygen scavenger packet. If defects such as oxidized or rancid odors 

exist, they are likely due to package failure or the absence of an oxygen scavenger.

Special Notes

Each pouch shall contain one intact bagel and one intact oxygen scavenger.
No. 11-7116.

#### Roosevelt Broome, Jr., Petitioner v. Michael S. Hunter, et al.

565 U.S. 1124, 132 S. Ct. 1028,

181 L. Ed. 2d 758,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 34.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 409 Fed. Appx. 666.
ex10-1.htm






Exhibit 10.1


 


Amendment Number One


 


To The


 


West Marine, Inc.


 


Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan


 


Pursuant to the power reserved to the Board of Directors of West Marine, Inc. (the “Board”) under Section 15 of the West Marine, Inc. Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective as of May 19, 2011 (the “Plan”), at a meeting of the Board on March 30, 2012, the Board approved the following amendment to the Plan:


1.


Section 11 of the Plan, entitled "Non-Employee Director Awards” shall be amended by deleting the same in its entirety and by substituting in its place “Reserved”.


2.


This Amendment Number One to the Plan shall be effective as of March 30, 2012.






 



	 WEST MARINE, INC.
	 
	 
	 /s/ Pamela Fields
	Pamela Fields, Secretary
No. 11-512.

#### Robert Teaver, Petitioner v. Seatrax of Louisiana, Incorporated, et al.

565 U.S. 1113, 132 S. Ct. 1017,

181 L. Ed. 2d 737,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 293.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 434 Fed. Appx. 307.
(1) Adjusting Price $18.63 CWT

(2) Base Price $18.15 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.48

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0413

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0206

Price change per quart $0.0103

Price change per pint $0.0052

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0039

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0032

Price change per half pint $0.0026

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.04

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.02

Price adjustment per quart $0.01

Price adjustment per pint $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Dept. of Food and Agriculture Announcement of Minimum Prices

 Effective Date: March 5, 2017
If there were a vaccine against cancer, wouldn’t you get it for your kids?

HPV vaccine is cancer prevention. Talk to the doctor about

 vaccinating your 11–12 year old sons and daughters against HPV.

www.cdc.gov/vaccines/teens HPV vaccine is 

cancer prevention. 

Talk to the doctor 

about vaccinating 

your 11–12 year old

sons and daughters 

against HPV.

CS250577-I

If there were a 

vaccine against

cancer, wouldn’t

you get it for

your kids?

www.cdc.gov/vaccines/teens

June 2015
Vendor Shipping Webinar

Email this event to me @

Invalid Email Address!Invalid Email Address!

Start Date/Time:

Tuesday, June 18, 2024 2:00 PM

End Date/Time:

Tuesday, June 18, 2024 3:00 PM

Recurring Event:

One time event

Importance:

Normal Priority

Location:

Virtual/Online

Description:

An opportunity to learn about the web-based system that supports cargo movement for DLA.

Registration must be made in advance at: https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJIsdOippzkiHqAUYSW7qI7wJeeXinOFnUc

Enrolled Users:

Alandra Jones

                - Return
                - 
                - Export
No. 11-6095.

#### Israel Gonzales, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1159, 132 S. Ct. 1091,

181 L. Ed. 2d 983,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 848.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 642 F.3d 504.