alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
April 11, 2013

United States ofAmerica Department ofTransportation Office ofthe Secretary Washington, D.C. 20590 

## Samuel V. Weidner, Sr. 1585 Hanover Road Lewistown, Montana 59457 sweidner@mt.net

Re: Orderto Show Cause ProposingTermination ofEssential Air Service Eligibility at Lewistown Montana

To Whom It May Concern,

Iam a retired businessman, who presently serves on twoofthe most important boards in Lewistown, Montana -the Lewistown Municipal Airport Board and the Fergus County Port Authority Board. Both of these Boards deal with two issues critical to Lewistown's future. The first being economic development/business preservation. The second issue is to maintain public transportation critical to our Community's needs in rural Montana.

Itwas previously understoodthat EAS required the same carrierfor all Montana EAS cities. Our Community is now being told thatthere may be an option for Lewistown to have service to adifferent destination than other Montana EAS cities. Based upon the history ofLewistown airtravel, this should make it possible for Lewistown to maintain its EAS eligibility ifLewistown can change its destination city to Denver.
Specifically, when our EAS air providerflew to Denver in 2009 and 2010, the passenger numbers were approximately double the numbers, compared with years (such as presently), when Denver is not a destination from Lewistown. Our Community needs service to amajor hub, such as Denver, which is clearly shown in the numbers provided above.

We are hopeful thatthe DOTwill consider allowing Montana EA$ cities to have separate bid proposals, and permit Lewistown to go through atrial period to reestablish its EAS eligibility. 

# :?ti7JU**~**

samuel

## v. Weidner,

# s~
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIGUEL ANGEL QUEZADA,

Petitioner,

v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,
Respondent. No. 16

- 72674
Agency No. A078

- 008

- 133

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 22, 2018 **

Before: SILVERMAN , GRABER , and GOULD , Circuit Judges.
Miguel Angel Quezada , a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for revie w of the Board of Immigration Appeals ’ ( “BIA ”) order dismissing his a ppeal from an
immigration judge’s decision finding him ineligible for asylum and withholding of
removal, and denying relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”)

. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

OCT 29 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 72674

have jurisdict ion under 8 U.S.C. § 1252

. We review for abuse of discretion the
agency’s particularly serious crime determination. Avendano

- Hernandez v. Lynch , 800 F.3d 1072, 1077 (9th Cir. 2015)

. We review for substantial evidence the
agency’s factual findings. Silaya v. Mukasey , 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008)

.
We d eny the pet ition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in determining that Quezada’s
conviction for possession of coc aine for sale under California Health and Safety
Code § 113 5 1 was a particularly serious crime, where drug trafficking crimes are
presumed to be particularly serious, and the BIA consider ed the correct factors in
concluding Quezada failed to rebut that presumption

. See Miguel

- Miguel v.

Gonzales , 500 F.3d 941, 949 (9th Cir. 2007) ( recognizing the “strong presumption ”
that drug trafficking offenses are particularly serious) ; Avendano

- Hernandez , 800

F.3d at 1077 (“ Our review is limited to ensuring that the agency relied on the
appropriate f

actors and proper evidence to reach this conclusion. ” (internal
quotations omitted ) )

.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief, where
Quezada failed to show that it is more likely than not he would be tortured by or
with the acquiescence of a government official in Mexico

. See 8 C.F.R.
§ 1208.1 8(a)( 1); Silaya , 524 F.3d at 1073. The record does not support Quezada’s
contention that the agency failed to consider his claim in the totality. See3 16

- 72674

Najmabadi v. Holder , 597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 2010) (the agency must consider
the issues raised and express its decision “in terms sufficient to enable a reviewing
court to perceive that it has heard and thought and not merel y reacted” (citation
and quotation marks omitted)).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
No. 11-7174.

#### Juliane M. Iverson, Petitioner v. VenuWorks/Compass Facilities Management, Inc.

565 U.S. 1125, 132 S. Ct. 1031,

181 L. Ed. 2d 760,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 203.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 141 (Thursday, July 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19659]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Health

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
discuss confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 31, 1998.
    Time: 8:30 am to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Georgetown Holiday Inn, 2101 Wisconsin Ave., N.W., 
Washington, DC 20007.
    Contact Person: Aida K. Vasquez, Grant Technical Assistant, 
Extramural Review Branch, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism, Suite 409, 6000 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
301-443-9788.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.272, Alcohol 
National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol 
Research Center Grants, National Institute of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 17, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-19659 Filed 7-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

Monograph No. BO17 

09 September 2005 

NSN: 8950-01-368-7389

Item: Sauce Mix, Cheese, Instant 

Document: COTS 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: NA Component Classification: Secondary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80oF; 6 months at 100oF 

Item Characteristics

Appearance: 

Free flowing instant cheese powder with color appropriate to cheese type, i.e. 

American could be either white or orange in color. Mix shall be uniform in 

composition and appearance, free from black specs or lumps that do not fall apart 

under light finger pressure. 

Prepared: Product shall possess a thick creamy cheese sauce consistency. 

Odor: Odor shall be typical of specified processed cheese type. 

Flavor: Flavor shall be typical of specified processed cheese type. 

Texture: Free flowing powder free from lumps that do not fall apart under light finger pressure. 

Prepared: Product shall readily attain a thick creamy sauce consistency. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: 

Product may clump or darken with age. 

Prepared: Product may have clumps that do not break upon heating/stirring and may 

not readily attain a thick creamy cheese sauce appearance. 

Odor: Rancid, stale, oxidized, tallowy, bitter, fishy, soapy, scorched, or other objectionable 

odors. 

Flavor: Rancid, stale, oxidized, tallowy, bitter, fishy, soapy, scorched, or other objectionable 

flavors. 

Texture: 

Powder may clump. 

Prepared: Product may contain lumps and may not readily attain a thick creamy 

cheese sauce consistency. 

Monograph No. BO17, Page 1of 2 Pages 
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

Monograph No. BO17 

09 September 2005 

NSN: 8950-01-368-7389

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Prepare as directed on label. 

Monograph No. BO17, Page 2of 2 Pages
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Bruce Leitch, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer of Cool Can Technologies, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                              

| | By:    | /s/ Bruce Leitch       
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Bruce Leitch           
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| |        | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | January 5, 2004        

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         3,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  887,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,558,000
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               985,000
<PP&E>                                         11,550,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 6,843,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,931,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,451,000
<BONDS>                                        3,517,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       22,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     20,818,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,931,000
<SALES>                                        2,810,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,810,000
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,411,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             350,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,951,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,951,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,951,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (2.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (2.27)



</TABLE>
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, John P. Thornton, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of NorPac Technologies, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                        



| | By:    | /s/
      John P. Thornton 
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | JOHN P. THORNTON           
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer    
| |        | and Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | May 15, 2008               



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
EX-10.10



 Exhibit 10.10 
 FIFTH LEASE MODIFICATION AGREEMENT 
 AGREEMENT made as of April 1,
1982 between 60 EAST 42ND ST. ASSOCIATES, a co-partnership having its office at 60 East 42nd Street, New York, New York (hereinafter called “Landlord”) and LINCOLN BUILDING ASSOCIATES, a co-partnership, having its office at 60 East 42nd
Street, New York, New York (hereinafter called “Tenant”). 
 W I T N E S S E T H: 

WHEREAS, the parties entered into an agreement of lease dated October 1, 1958, whereby Landlord leased to Tenant, and Tenant hired
that certain parcel of real property, with the buildings and improvements thereon, known as and by the street numbers 60 East 42nd Street and 301 Madison Avenue, New York, New York, together with the fixtures, chattels and articles of personal
property used in connection with said premises; and 
 WHEREAS, the lease was modified by agreements dated January 1, 1964,
as of January 1, 1977, as of April 1, 1979, and as of April 1, 1981 (which lease, as so modified, is hereinafter called the “Lease”); and 
 WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant wish to further modify the Lease. 
 NOW, THEREFORE,
in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein contained, the parties agree that the Lease shall be and is hereby modified in the manner hereinafter set forth: 
 1. Paragraph 2A(ii) of the Lease shall be deemed deleted in its entirety and the following substituted in its place and stead: 

“(ii) Commencing April 1, 1982, Tenant covenants to pay, in equal monthly installments of $163,594.27 each, in
advance, on the first day of each month during the term of this Lease, and any renewal term of this Lease, a basic rent (hereinafter called “Basic Rent”) at an annual rate of ONE MILLION NINE HUNDRED SIXTY-THREE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED
THIRTY-ONE DOLLARS AND 24/100 ($1,963,131.24), said amount being equal to the sum of the current mortgage charges plus $24,000.” 
 2. Except as herein modified, the Lease shall remain in full force and effect, and the parties hereby ratify and confirm all of the other terms, covenants and conditions thereof. 

3. This Fifth Lease Modification Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective
legal representatives, successors and assigns. 

  
 33933.1 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement as of the day and
year first above written. 
  

			
	60 EAST 42ND ST. ASSOCIATES
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Lawrence A. Wien

		 	    Partner
	
	LINCOLN BUILDING ASSOCIATES
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Peter L. Malkin

		 	    Partner



  
 33933.1
Montana Twenty-First Judicial District Court. County of Ravalli.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- PATRICK TERRY FLOWERS, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-14-114

DECISION

On August 25, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a commitment to the Montana Department of Corrections for placement in a prison designated by the Montana Department of Corrections for a period of five (5) years, for the offense of Charge 1: Partner or Family Member Assault (3rd or Subsequent Offense), a Felony, in violation of §45-5-206, MCA. The Defendant was ordered to pay restitution to the Montana Crime Victim Compensation Program for what they have spent on behalf of the victim in the sum of $6,571.45, plus a restitution supervision fee of $657.14. Due to the amount of restitution, the Court did not levy a fine for this charge. This sentence shall run consecutively to the sentence in DC-15-001. The Defendant was designated a persistent felony offender.

*13Done in open Court this 4th day of February, 2016.

DATED this 29th day of February, 2016.

On February 4, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Jennifer Streano of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was represented by Ravalli County Attorney, Bill Fulbright, who appeared by video conferencing.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. John Warner, Member.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 1688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-418]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION


Revised Jurisdictional Thresholds for Section 8 of the Clayton 
Act

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Trade Commission announces the revised thresholds 
for interlocking directorates required by the 1990 amendment of Section 
8 of the Clayton Act. Section 8 prohibits, with certain exceptions, one 
person from serving as a director or officer of two competing 
corporations if two thresholds are met. Competitor corporations are 
covered by Section 8 if each one has capital, surplus, and undivided 
profits aggregating more than $10,000,000, with the exception that no 
corporation is covered if the competitive sales of either corporation 
are less than $1,000,000. Section 8(a)(5) requires the Federal Trade 
Commission to revise those thresholds annually, based on the change in 
gross national product. The new thresholds, which take effect 
immediately, are $26,161,000 for Section 8(a)(1), and $2,616,100 for 
Section 8(a)(2)(A).

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 13, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James F. Mongoven, Bureau of 
Competition, Office of Policy and Coordination, (202) 326-2879.

    Authority:  15 U.S.C. Sec.  19(a)(5).
    By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-418 Filed 1-12-09; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6750-01-S
16 December 2009 ******************************

NSN: 8905 01 572 7537 * MONOGRAPH NO: 1A12

 *****************************

Item: Seasoned Au Jus Flavored Sauce with Beef Steaks (AJB)

Document: PCR-S-020, Seasoned Au Jus Flavored Sauce with Beef Steaks, Packaged in a 

Polymeric Tray, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 180 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Beef steaks: Oblong shape, uniform in size and shape with medium brown color.

Sauce: Glossy, translucent and moderately thin with a medium to dark brown color. 

Odor: Beef steaks: Cooked beef.

Sauce: Savory beef broth.

Flavor: Beef steaks: Cooked beef.

Sauce: Savory beef broth.

Texture: Beef steaks: Cohesive, tender, slightly moist and slightly juicy.

Sauce: Smooth and moderately thin.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance:

Beef steaks: May become darkened.

Sauce: Separation (oiling off).

Odor: Loss of odor, rancid, oxidized beef.

Flavor: Rancid, oxidized or excessive metallic flavor.

Texture: Beef steaks: May become excessively soft or mushy.

Sauce: May separate due to oiling off.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

NA
No. 11-6935.

#### Buster J. Matthews, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 1119, 132 S. Ct. 1013,

181 L. Ed. 2d 750,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 385.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.