alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 30, 2012 

jam 

Order 

 

July 30, 2012 

145563 (22) 

CARNELL MCCREARY, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 145563 

 COA: 307837 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

 Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $4.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court. 

 If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$371.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. 

 Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this 

Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

 The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CARL DEAN EDWARDS, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA; AND THE STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondents. No. 70531 

# FILED JUL 2 8 2016

TRACE K. LINDEMAN CLERK F SUPREME COURT BY '

OEPUTY CLERK 

### ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This appeal was docketed in this court on June 9, 2016, without payment of the requisite filing fee. On that same day a notice was issued directing appellant to pay the filing fee within ten days, The notice further advised that failure to pay the filing fee within ten days would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise, responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed.

It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT TRACE K. LINDEMAN BY:



### cc: Hon. Kimberly A. Wanker, District Judge Carl Dean Edwards Attorney General/Carson City Nye County District Attorney Nye County Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER (0)-1947 4.0eix,
**
**EXHIBIT 31**

**Certifications**

I,Richard Simpson, certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this report onForm 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report onForm 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2017-B1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of RegulationAB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and 

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reportshave been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; LNR Partners, LLC; Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC; Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas; CoreLogic Commercial RealEstate Services, Inc.; National Tax Search, LLC; AEGON USA Realty Advisors, LLC; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; and KeyBank National Association. 

Date:    November 27, 2019 

 

/s/ Richard Simpson

Richard Simpson

President, CitigroupCommercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

 
CGCMT 2017-B1 Certifications (2018) 

**
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATE OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF
AMERICAN CELLULAR CORPORATION I, Everett R. Dobson, Chairman of the Board and principal executive officer of American Cellular
Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the quarterly report
of the Company on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2005, (the Report):  a.
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and thatb.
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company at March 31, 2005, and the results of
the Companys operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005. May 10, 2005
    
    /S/ EVERETT R. DOBSONEverett R. DobsonChairman of the Board and principal executive officer 21
PO Box 4055, Greenville, SC 29608 - 864.492.1648 - 

wwwm3partnersllccom

March 17, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

Subject: M3 PARTNERS, LLC (DBA WHITE TOP UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS WT-UAS 

PETITION 

 FOR EXEMPTION

To Whom It May Concern:

Please accept this petition for exemption on behalf of M3 Partners, LLC.

Our petition is submitted with the desire to operate UAS’s in conjunction with M3 Partners business 

supporting helicopter/helipad & real estate services. 

M3 Partners owners have extensive knowledge and experience in both the civilian and military aviation 

fields and would like to bring this knowledge to the safe operational control of UAS’s to support and 

enhance its business. 

The knowledge and tools that M3 Partners has created to assist in making helicopter and helipad 

operations safer are prime examples of our continual focus on safety and the belief that safety can 

always be improved upon. It is this same determination that we can bring to our UAS operations if we 

are granted an exemption and serve as an example of how a deep understanding of best practices from 

the civilian and military aviation sectors can be applied to UAS operations. An exemption would also 

allow our business to grow and operate more efficiently allowing M3 Partners to expand and provide 

increased employment opportunities to our local community. 

We look forward to working with the Department of Transportation and the Federal Aviation 

Administration at the inception of commercial UAS operations. We respectfully request that our petition 

be granted and allow M3 Partners to serve as a role model for UAS operations now and in the future. 

Respectfully, 

Michael W. Middleton Martin J. Fisher

President Member
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

# RECEIVED

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, 

## MAR 

## t2

## 2012 Complainant, FAADocket noHEARING DOCKET

v. ELITE AIR, Respondent,

RESPONDENT'S INITIAL DISCLOSURES I. INIDIVIDUALS LIKELY TO HAVE DISCOVERABLE INFORMATION THAT MAY BE USED TO SUPPORT THE ACTING ADMINISTRATOR'S COMPLAINT. l. David Keys (Captain) c/o Elite Air 100 Second Avenue South, Suite 1202 St. Petersburg FL 33701 Informationincludes: Knowledge ofmaintenance and status ofaircraft during relevant times and also pre-flight inspection during relevant times. 2. Joel Kennerknect (First Officer) c/o Elite Air 100 Second Avenue South, Suite 1202 St. Petersburg FL 33701 Information includes: Knowledge ofmaintenance and status ofaircraft during relevant times and also pre-flightinspection during relevant times. 3. Jim Magill (Director ofMaitenance) c/o EliteAir 100 SecondAvenue South, Suite 1202 St. Petersburg FL 33701 Informationincludes: Maintenance status ofaircraft during all relevant times.4. Paul Bechtold (Maintenance) c/o Elite Air 100 Second Avenue South, Suite 1202 St. Petersburg FL 33701 Information includes: Maintenance status ofaircraft during all relevant times. II. CATEGORIES AND LOCATION OF DOCUMENTS 1. EliteAir General Operations Manual Located at Elite Air 100 Second Avenue South, Suite 1202 St. Petersburg FL 33701 2. Relevant portions ofFAA Order 8900.1, Chapter 14 Located online at www.faa.gov III. COMPUTATION OF CIVIL PENALTY SANTCION: 1. There are no damages in this case. 2. To the extent the civil penaltyis construed as a damage for this case, the assessed civil penalty was computed pursuant to guidance in FAA Order 2150.3B Respectfully submitted this 5th day ofMarch, 2012.

# ~~

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing hasbeen furnished by CertifiedMail/Return Receipt Requested to the following: Hearing Docket Clerk FAA, AGC-430 Suite 2Wl000 Wilbur Wright Building 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington DC 20591 Ryan Landers USDepartment ofTransportation Office ofRegional Counsel Post Office Box 20636 Atlanta GA 30320

B. Gray Gibb Esq. Attorney for Elite Air, Inc.
26 September 2012 *************************

NSN: 8940- 01-397-6661 (CHT) *MONOGRAPH NO: M2E*

*************************

Item: Cheese Tortellini in Tomato Sauce 

Document: PCR-C-020, Cheese Tortellini in Tomato Sauce, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf 

Stable 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 260 Component Classification: PRIMARY

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Pasta: Off white color. Intact ring-like shape with cheese filling.

Sauce: Red to reddish brown color with visible flecks of herbs and spices. 

Odor: Cooked tortellini with a mild cheese filling in tomato sauce flavored with Italian 

seasonings. 

Flavor: Cooked tortellini with a mild cheese filling in tomato sauce flavored with Italian 

seasonings. 

Texture:

Pasta: Slightly soft to slightly firm. Soft and smooth cheese filling.

Sauce: Moderately thick. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Pasta: Broken or mushy; darkened or discolored.

Sauce: Darkened.

Odor: Strong rancid cheese odor, oxidized tomato.

Flavor: Increased bitterness, acidic, oxidized tomato; strong rancid cheese. 

Texture: Pasta: Soft, mushy, broken.

Sauce: Dry, pasty.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

 

Special Notes

NA
TABLE X - CONTRACTOR ABBREVIATIONS (UPDATED OCT 04) 

 CONTRACTOR ITEM DIST/SUB ABBREV 

ARC DIVERSIFIED VARIOUS ARC 

BEST HARVEST BAKERIES BUNS SUBCONTRACTOR BHB 

CHARMS COMPANY CANDY CHM 

D.D. BEANS & SONS DDB 

DEWAFELBAKKERS INC WAFFELS DEW 

ENTERPRISE UNLIMITED VARIOUS DISTRIBUTOR ENT 

ENVISION (NIB/NISH) TRASH BAGS ENV 

FORD GUM & MACHINE CO FDG 

GOSSNER FOODS UHT MILK SUBCONTRACTOR GOS 

HANOVER FOODS CORP VARIOUS HAN 

IMPERIAL SALES VARIOUS DISTRIBUTOR IMP 

LABATT FOOD SERVICE VARIOUS LAB 

LC INDUSTRIES DINING 

PACKETS 

 LCI 

M&M MARS CANDY MRS 

MAPLE ISLAND CHEESES MAP 

MASTERTASTE PURCHASING DEHY JUICES CHM 

NATIONAL INDUSTRIES PRODUCTS CORP DINING 

PACKETS 

 NIP 

OREGON FREEZE DRY VARIOUS 

DEHY ITEMS 

 ORE 

ROSE RESNICK LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND RRB 

STEGNER FOOD PRODUCTS COMPANY POLYMERIC 

TRAY ITEMS 

 SFP 

STERLING FOODS TRAY PACK 

CAKE/UGR-A 

 STR 

SWANS FOODS INC SFI 

TATE & LYLE NORTH AMERICAN SUGARS T&L 

THE WORNICK COMPANY CINCINNATI, OH POLYMERIC 

TRAY ITEMS 

 WCN 

THE WORNICK COMPANY McAllen, TX WMC 

TONY DOWNS FOODS POULTRY TNY 

US CONTRACTS GROUP USG 

VANEE FOODS CORP METAL TRAY 

PACK ITEMS 

 VEE 

VENTURA FOODS LLC/BOCA GRANDE PB & J PRIME/SUB 

CONTRACTOR 

VEN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF FABRI-CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AS OF FEBRUARY 1,
1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE FIFTY-THREE WEEKS THEN
ENDED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           FEB-1-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                FEB-1-1997
<CASH>                                          12,631
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    296,104
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               318,267
<PP&E>                                         176,416
<DEPRECIATION>                                  81,798
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 429,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          141,220
<BONDS>                                         72,083
<COMMON>                                         1,010
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     198,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   429,180
<SALES>                                        928,951
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               928,951
<CGS>                                          516,857
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  878,918
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,668
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,365
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,762
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,603
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,913
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.26
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-2222

MICHELLE L. REAGAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GORDON R. ENGLAND, in his official capacity as

Secretary of the Navy,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA02-373-JFM)

Submitted: March 28, 2003 Decided: March 24, 2004

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David H. Shapiro, Richard L. Swick, SWICK & SHAPIRO, P.C.,

Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Thomas M. DiBiagio, United States

Attorney, Kristine L. Sendek-Smith, Assistant United States

Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michelle L. Reagan appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of her former employer in this

employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the parties’

briefs, the district court’s order, and the joint appendix and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Reagan v. England, No. CA-02-373-JFM

(D. Md. filed Sept. 4, 2002, and entered Sept. 5, 2002). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

honorable Forreeter Hancock 

QrWLml Distrlat Attorney 

ikxahachle, Term 

Dear Sir: Attentlom Mr. 

‘. 

,P as follmts¶ 

date an opinitm 

ters herein net 

whom prealnat a 

la situated needs 

e a mad Wuak. The 

aounty at thts particular 

y, but will have it later 

e truck purahaaed vill be 

not the road 

oad diutriat 

has Is Monet derived from the sale of road 

bonds heretofore voted and sold. 

nF 

Qan the Coxmitlssionere~ t?ou& 

legally orrow money tram! a bonded read distriat, tlmt la, bond money, and purebase a 

truok with ealcl momy for the oouixty, and 
Xonorable Borrester Randock, Page 2 

later pay the money back to this road district out of the general Pund of the county? 

n+ l I). We have advised that this 

borrowing would be a transfer of the fund, 

and Is prohibited by Article 8, Sectlon 9, 

Constitution of Texan. 

?!he Commissioners' Court is dissatlafled 

with this opinion and Is appealing to you for 

your opinion." 

You state ln your letter as quoted above that the 

money that the road district has is money derLved from the sale 

of road bonds heretofore voted and sold. It is 8 well knm 

prinalple of lav that funds or moneys obtained by the sales of 

bonds must be used and expended only for the purpose for vhlah 

the bonds vere voted and issued, and a diversion of the use of 

suah funds or moneys for a different purpose vould be unetithorlzed. Texas, Jurisprudence, Vol. 21, fage 686; (Also see the 

oases of Aransas County v. Coleman-Fulton Pasture Cod, 191 8.Y. 

553; Reathman v. Slngleta~, 12 S.X. (2d) 150; Ruggina v. *den, 

259 3-W. 204; and Orayson County v. Rarrell, 202 3.X. 160). 

In passing upon a s$milar quest%on,,this department 

held in Opinion lo. O-1397 "the aommleaionersl oourt la not authorized to allow Road and Bridge Precincts in need OS funds to 

opemte pending the oollectlon bf current revenues to borrow 

funds from the Road Bond Aeaount, to supplement their Road and 

Bridge Fund Accouut, although suoh transfer Is made with the 

understanding that such borroved funds be paid bask to the Road 

Bond Fund out of colleofions of the borrovlng Road and Bridge 

Precinct during the ensuing year." We ape enclosing e aopy of 

this opinion for your lnformatlon. 

You are respectfully advised th+t it is the opinion 

of this department that 'be commissioners~ court could not legally use the bond money for the purpose above mentioned. 

This opinion ia not to be construed as holding that 

the Gomalasioners8 court has legal authority to purchase a truck 

to be used In connection vlth the maintemme end construation 

of public roads of the oounty and pay for the same out of the 

general fund of the GOuty, provided said fundr fare available. 
%onorable Forrester %nGOGk, Page 3 

Trustfng that the foregoing fully answers your inquiry, 

ve are 

Yours very truly 

ATTOFQIEY OEltEW OF TEXAS 

(&4htzu& 

BY 

Ardell Williams 

Assistant
No. 11-7458.

#### Julian Salazar, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1132, 132 S. Ct. 1051,

181 L. Ed. 2d 772,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 120.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 654 F.3d 753 and 436 Fed. Appx. 639.
-78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0

 38.5

 39.0

 39.5

★▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

08/30

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6251

ROBERT LANE WISE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THEODIS BECK,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District

Judge. (CA-03-91-1)

Submitted: June 14, 2004 Decided: July 1, 2004

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Lane Wise, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wallace-Smith,

Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Robert Lane Wise, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final

order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims

addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find both that his constitutional claims are

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by

the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 337-81 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wise

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny the

motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate

of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-Q of  Mission  West
Properties,  Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly  period ended March 31, 2006
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  each of Carl E.  Berg,  Chairman  of the Board  and Chief  Executive
Officer of the Company, Raymond V. Marino, President and Chief Operating Officer
of the Company and Wayne N. Pham,  Vice  President of Finance and  Controller of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss.  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  to the best of his  knowledge,
that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/ Carl E. Berg
----------------------------------
Carl E. Berg
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
May 9, 2006

/s/ Raymond V. Marino
----------------------------------
Raymond V. Marino
President and Chief Operating Officer
May 9, 2006

/s/ Wayne N. Pham
----------------------------------
Wayne N. Pham
Vice President of Finance and Controller
May 9, 2006

This  certification   accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  or  otherwise  required,  be  deemed  filed by the
Company  for  purposes  of ss. 18 of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
amended.