alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6463
WILLIE J. ODOM, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PARKER EVATT, South Car olina Department of Corrections; TRAVIS MEDLOCK, Attorney General of State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. C. W eston Houck, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-1787-2-2AJ) Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 17, 1997 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie J. Odom, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Odom v. Evatt , No. CA-94-1787-2-2AJ (D.S.C. Mar. 4, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

DISMISSED
No. 11-5783.

#### Kenneth Leslie Caldwell, Petitioner v. Idaho, et al.

565 U.S. 1088, 132 S. Ct. 839,

181 L. Ed. 2d 544,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8675.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 951, 132 S. Ct. 417, 181 L. Ed. 2d 273, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7323.
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

TROOP SUPPORT

700 ROBBINS AVENUE

PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19111-5092

Dear Valued Contractor,

The Berry Amendment is a critical statute that requires the purchase of domestically 

manufactured Clothing and Textiles end items and is implemented via DFARS 252.225-7012 – Preference 

for Certain Domestic Commodities. As a reminder, unless an exception in DFARS 225-7002-2 applies, for 

clothing items both the end item and the components of the end item are required to be manufactured 

domestically. A component as defined in DFARS 252.225-7012 (a) Definitions, “means any item supplied 

to the Government as part of an end product or of another component.” This language requires the 

components of components, also at times referred so as subcomponents, to be manufactured 

domestically. Non-textile components (and components of components) of clothing, such as those 

comprised of metal or plastic, are required to be manufactured domestically as well.

Recently it has come to the attention of DLA Troop Support contracting personnel of instances 

where some components of components for clothing were not manufactured domestically. This is a 

significant finding. Both DLA Troop Support and our Industry Partners have a role to play in ensuring 

compliance with the Berry Amendment. DLA Troop Support is in the process of increasing Berry 

Amendment Compliance outreach efforts, including increased communications focused on the topic plus 

additional site visits to supplier locations. What I am requesting of you, DLA’s industry partners, is 

increased vigilance with suppliers by being actively engaged throughout your supply chain with the origin 

of components. When possible perform site visits, request additional documentation and ask tough 

questions to gain a better insight into where your supplies (including all components of components) are 

originating

Non-compliance harms the industrial base and weakens both the Congressional and public trust 

in our shared responsibility to comply with this requirement and fully support American manufacturing. 

Non-compliance is a significant issue, which results in the rejection/return of product. Request that you 

share this letter with all of your suppliers and request that they in turn share it further down the supply 

chain.

If there are any questions related to Berry Amendment compliance or about an interpretation of 

this regulation, you are strongly recommended to reach out to your contracting officer for further 

guidance.

 Respectfully,

 STEVE MERCH

 Director of Supplier Operations 

DLA Troop Support, Clothing and Textiles
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00183-CR

Kristen Marie Jackson

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 1

of Tarrant County (1272956D)

June 20, 2013

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _________________________________

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
************************

• MONOGRAPH NO.: 2A3

************************

ITEM: Peaches, Quarters or (PCS)

 Slices, w/Syrup

NSN: 8915-01-278-1559 ITEM SPECIFICATION: US STD for Grades

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 95

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

 APPEARANCE: Typical peach bright orange-yellow.

 ODOR: Slightly sweet peach.

 FLAVOR: Sweet peach.

 TEXTURE: Firm to slightly firm.

 ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT 70 DEGREES F: 36(24) months

 80 DEGREES F: 30(20) months

 90 DEGREES F: 24(16) months

 100 DEGREES F: 18(12) months

 NOTE: Numbers in parentheses are data for #10 cans.

EXPECTED DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

 APPEARANCE: Darker to deep yellow, slightly soft.

 ODOR: Weak, slightly sour peach.

 FLAVOR: Slightly tart or sour, bland, slightly metallic.

 TEXTURE: Soft, mushy.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None.

SPECIAL NOTES: Product is packed in #2-1/2 can. Can is designed

to yield 6 portions of approximately 1/2 cup each (128 grams).
**
Exhibit 35.1 

Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation 

**NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

The undersigned, Kevin J. Cullum, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows: 

(1) The undersigned has caused a reviewof the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2020 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and ServicingAgreement, dated as of August 23, 2017 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables2017-B Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and 

(2) To the best of theundersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forpublicly-issued asset-backed securities. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 26th day of June, 2020. 

 

/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer**
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 38 (Friday, February 27, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 8867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4231]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[EPA-RO7-RCRA-2008-0830; FRL-8778-1]


Nebraska: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management 
Program Revisions; Withdrawal of Immediate Final Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of immediate final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Because EPA received adverse comment, we are withdrawing the 
immediate final rule for Nebraska: Final Authorization of State 
Hazardous Waste Management Program Revisions, published on December 30, 
2008.

DATES: Effective February 27, 2009, EPA withdraws the immediate final 
rule published at 73 FR 79661 on December 30, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Haugen, Immediate Office, Air and 
Waste Management Division, EPA Region 7, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas 
City, Kansas 66101, telephone (913) 551-7877, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1078716577757e3e7c796371507560713e777f66"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6b030a1e0c0e05450702180a2b0e1b0a450c041d">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Because EPA received adverse comment, we are 
withdrawing the immediate final rule for Nebraska: Final Authorization 
of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revisions published on 
December 30, 2008 (73 FR 79661). We stated in that immediate final rule 
that if we received adverse comment by January 29, 2009, the immediate 
final rule would not take effect and we would publish a timely 
withdrawal in the Federal Register. We will address the comment in a 
subsequent final action. As stated in the immediate final rule and the 
parallel proposed rule, we will not institute a second comment period 
in this action.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Confidential business information, Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste 
transportation, Incorporation by reference, Indian lands, 
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

    Authority: This action is issued under the authority of section 
2002(a), 3006 and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as 
amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926 and 6974(b).

    Dated: February 23, 2009.
William Rice,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. E9-4231 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3308 

To amend the American Innovation and Competitiveness Act and the National 

Science Foundation Act of 2002 to incorporate art and design into 

certain STEM education programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2019 

Ms. BONAMICI (for herself, Mr. LANGEVIN, and Ms. STEFANIK) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, 

and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Education and 

Labor, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the American Innovation and Competitiveness Act 

and the National Science Foundation Act of 2002 to 

incorporate art and design into certain STEM education 

programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Building STEAM Edu5 cation Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3308 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCORPORATION OF ART AND DESIGN INTO CER2 TAIN STEM EDUCATION PROGRAMS. 

3 (a) STEM EDUCATION ADVISORY PANEL CONSIDER4 ATIONS.—Section 303(c)(2) of the American Innovation 

5 and Competitiveness Act (42 U.S.C. 6621 note) is amend6 ed— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (H), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

8 the end; 

9 (2) in subparagraph (I), by striking the period 

10 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

11 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(J) ways to integrate art and design in 

13 STEM education programs to promote innova14 tion.’’. 

15 (b) NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION MATHEMATICS

16 AND SCIENCE EDUCATION PROGRAM.—Section 9(a) of the 

17 National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 2002 

18 (42 U.S.C. 1862n(a)) is amended— 

19 (1) in paragraph (3)— 

20 (A) in subparagraph (M), by striking 

21 ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

22 (B) by redesignating subparagraph (N) as 

23 subparagraph (O); and 

24 (C) after subparagraph (M), by inserting 

25 the following new subparagraph: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3308 IH

1 ‘‘(N) developing science, technology, engi2 neering, and mathematics educational cur3 riculum that incorporates art and design to pro4 mote creativity and innovation; and’’; and 

5 (2) in paragraph (10)(A)— 

6 (A) in clause (xi), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

7 end; 

8 (B) in clause (xii), by striking the period 

9 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

10 (C) after clause (xii), by inserting the fol11 lowing new clause: 

12 ‘‘(xiii) have a component that includes 

13 the integration of art and design principles 

14 and processes.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
No. 11-6269.

#### Randy Wilkins, Petitioner v. Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

565 U.S. 987, 132 S. Ct. 520,

181 L. Ed. 2d 366,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7850.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas denied.

Same case below, 2011 Ark. 169.
No. 11-7856.

#### Antonio Bradshaw, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1171, 132 S. Ct. 1127,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1005,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 587.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 445 Fed. Appx. 176.
No. 11-5014.

#### In re George M. Papa, et ux., Petitioners.

565 U.S. 813, 132 S. Ct. 394,

181 L. Ed. 2d 248,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6366,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
No. 11-6063.

#### Michael Lee Davis, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1084,

181 L. Ed. 2d 802,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 476.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 983, 132 S. Ct. 508, 181 L. Ed. 2d 358, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7856.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 11607 and # 11608]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (FEMA—1813—DR), dated 01/05/2009. *Incident:*
                         Severe Winter Storm and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         12/11/2008 and continuing.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         01/05/2009. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         03/06/2009. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/05/2009.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 01/05/2009, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Berkshire, Franklin, Hampden, Hampshire, Worcester. *The Interest Rates are:* PercentOther (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit Available Elsewhere
4.500Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11607B and for economic injury is 11608B. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Herbert L. Mitchell, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E9-423 Filed 1-12-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
No. 11-67.

#### Ralph Inzunza, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1110, 132 S. Ct. 997,

181 L. Ed. 2d 733,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 373.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 638 F.3d 1006.
Exhibit 35.27  LOGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1050-084, 8th Fl
401 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334  ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Reference is hereby made to that certain Trust and Serving Agreement dated as of May 30, 2017, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial
Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Servicer, Aegon USA Realty Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, National
Association, as Trustee and Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC, as Operating Advisor , with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2017- 245P (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined
shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 13.7 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of
Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:  1.
A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.  LOGOLeslie Hayton Managing Director
Wells Fargo Bank    Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

LOGO
No. 11-7787.

#### Victor Vevea, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1155, 132 S. Ct. 1135,

181 L. Ed. 2d 975,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 855.

January 17, 2012.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until February 7, 2012, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Same case below, 446 Fed. Appx. 63.
No. 11-171.

#### Jacqueline Osmolski and Steven Osmolski, Jr., Petitioners v. New Jersey.

565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1079,

181 L. Ed. 2d 797,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 415.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 944, 132 S. Ct. 413, 181 L. Ed. 2d 259, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7264.
#### Tampa Electric Company, a Corporation, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. T. A. Knowles, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed June 3, 1926.

*Knight, Thompson <& Turner,*for Plaintiff in Error;

No appearance for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

— An action was brought under the statute, Section 4962, Revised General Statutes of 1920, by the father to recover damages for mental pain and suffering by the father and mother because of the wrongful death of their fifteen months’ old minor child caused by impact with defendant’s street car, the child being unattended and walked too near the street ear track in front of plaintiff’s home just as a car was passing. Verdict and judgment for $5,000.00 were rendered for the plaintiff and defendant took writ of error.

This is not an action by an infant for personal injuries where contributory negligence of the parents will not be *1033imputed to the child. Jacksonville Electric Co. v. Adams, 50 Fla. 429, 39 South. Rep. 183.

It is not clear that, notwithstanding the verdict and judgment, liability of the defendant is not shown, but it is clear that contributory negligence of the parents appears as averred, and the amount of the damages awarded indicates that the damages were not diminished in proportion to the default attributable to the parents as is required by the statute, Section 4962, 4964, 4965, Eevised General Statutes of 1920.

If the plaintiff remits $2,500.00, the judgment will stand for the remainder, $2,500.00; otherwise, the judgment will stand reversed for a new trial.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Brown, C. J., and Ellis, J., concur in the opinion.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Reward  Enterprises,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date: November 15, 2004                        By:  /s/ Earl Ingarfield
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Name:  Earl Ingarfield
                                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 15, 2004                        By:  /s/ Earl Ingarfield
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Name:  Earl Ingarfield
                                                 Title: Chief Financial Officer


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authentications,   acknowledging,  or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  required  by  Section  906,  has  been  provided  to  Reward
Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Reward Enterprises, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.