alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 16, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40897

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SANDRA ARREOLA-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:06-CR-36-ALL

--------------------

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sandra Arreola-Hernandez appeals her guilty-plea conviction

and sentence for illegal reentry following deportation in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Arreola-Hernandez argues that the

district court misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines by

characterizing her state felony conviction for possession of a

controlled substance as an “aggravated felony” under U.S.S.G.

§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(C).

Because Arreola-Hernandez has completed the confinement

portion of her sentence, any argument that the term of
No. 06-40897

-2-

incarceration should be reduced is moot, and the only portion of

the sentence remaining for consideration is her term of

supervised release. However, Arreola-Hernandez has been removed

from the United States. Because Arreola-Hernandez is barred from

returning to the United States, and there is no indication that

she has waived her right to be present for resentencing, ArreolaHernandez’s challenge to the validity of her sentence is moot. 

See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 383 (5th

Cir. 2007). The appeal is therefore DISMISSED as to ArreolaHernandez’s sentence.

For the first time on appeal, Arreola-Hernandez also

challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) in light

of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). ArreolaHernandez’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). 

Although Arreola-Hernandez contends that Almendarez-Torres was

incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court

would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi, we have

repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that

Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v.

Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,

126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Arreola-Hernandez properly concedes that

her argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and

circuit precedent, but she raises it here to preserve it for

further review. Accordingly, Arreola-Hernandez’s conviction is
No. 06-40897

-3-

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF DENIED AS

UNNECESSARY.
No. 11-398.

#### Department of Health and Human Services, et al., Petitioners v. Florida, et al.

565 U.S. 1108, 132 S. Ct. 1073,

181 L. Ed. 2d 730,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 196.

January 9, 2012.

Motion of Association of American Physicians & Surgeons, Inc., et al. for leave to intervene denied.
J. 

Because we discern no abuse of the district court's broad discretion in this 

instance, Houk v. State, 103 Nev. 659, 664, 747 P.2d 1376, 1379 (1987), we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

Gibbons 

Douglas Saitta 

cc: Hon. Michael Montero, District Judge 

Humboldt County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Humboldt County District Attorney 

Humboldt County Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 

IMINEWANMEMENSEMIErwail .177.
Michigan Supreme

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 16, 2015 

# Order

June 16 , 2015

151051 ( 60 )( 62 )

CITY OF COLDWATER

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

,

v

CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY

, Defendant

- Appell ant

. SC: 151051

COA: 320181

Branch CC: 13

- 040185

- CZ

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the separate motions of the Association of

Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity (ABATE) and the Michigan Municipal Electric

Association (MMEA) to participate as amici curiae are GRANTED. The amicus brief

submitt ed by ABATE on June 8, 2015, and the amicus brief submitt ed by MMEA on

June 10, 2015, are accepted for filing.
Date: 30 July 2021 **********************

NSN: 8915-01-691-5202 (FPS) * MONOGRAPH M5P

 **********************

Item: Apple, strawberry, carrot fruit squeeze (Flavor I)

Document: PCR-F-004, Fruit Puree Squeeze, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 100 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 3 years at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Uniform fine pulp, glossy sheen and minimal free liquid. The puree shall be a golden 

orange-tan color with a slight pink hue.

Odor: Moderate apple and strawberry with slight carrot.

Flavor: Moderate apple and strawberry with slight carrot and shall be free from astringent 

flavor.

Texture: Uniform fine pulp, moderately to very thick with no undissolved particles.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Excessive darkening, excessive syneresis and extreme runniness

Odor:

Lack of moderate apple and strawberry odor, fermented flavor, moderate to strong sour, 

musty.

Flavor: Lack of moderate apple and strawberry flavor. Musty, old, overly sour, fermented, 

caramelized.

Texture: Moderate to extreme syneresis.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

To examine for excessive weeping, pour product onto a flat unrestricted surface (e.g., bottom of paper

plate or cookie sheet) and observe for approximately one minute before making your determination.

Special Notes

N/A
# C_2016273EN.01000902.xml

| 27.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/9

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

(2016/C 273/06)

Pursuant to the second indent of Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

1

2

On page 367

On page 367

The following text is inserted:

The following text is inserted:

| ‘8714 99 90 | Other; parts

  This subheading includes child seats intended for the transport of children on “adult bicycles”. They can be either mounted on the luggage carrier, the frame or can be fitted on or to the handlebars. These seats are suitable for use principally with bicycles and are therefore considered as an accessory for a bicycle.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘8714 99 90

Other; parts

This subheading includes child seats intended for the transport of children on “adult bicycles”. They can be either mounted on the luggage carrier, the frame or can be fitted on or to the handlebars. These seats are suitable for use principally with bicycles and are therefore considered as an accessory for a bicycle.’

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 76, 4.3.2015, p. 1.

2

---
## NO. 12-09-00171-CR IN THE COUR T OF APP EALS TWELFTH COURT OF APP EALS D ISTR ICT

TYLER, TEXA S
MARC KEVI N W IL LI AMS, § APP EAL FRO

M T HE APPELLANT V. § COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TH E ST ATEOFTEX

AS, APP ELL EE § SMI TH CO UNTY

, T EXAS MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION PER CU RIAM Appellant has f

iled a motion to dismiss this appeal. T he motion is signed by Appellant and his counsel. No dec ision having been delivere d by this court, the motion is grante d, and the appeal is dismi ssed in acc ordanc e with Texa s Rule of AppellateProcedure 42.2. Opinion delivere d September 23, 2009. P an el consi s t ed of

W ort hen, C. J. , G r i

f f i t h, J. , and H oyl e, J.

(DO N OT PUBLISH)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50373 Conference Calendar

CHARLIE RAY RUMPH, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus UNK DOUGLAS; MARLIN POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-97-CV-254

- - - - - - - - - - October 20, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Charlie Ray Rumph appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for failure to pay the filing fee after having been denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). This is essentially a challenge to the district court’s finding that Rumph did not submit financial information sufficient to establish that he was financially qualified for IFP status. See Adkins v. E.I. du Pont De Nemours
& Co. , 335 U.S. 331, 339-40 (1948) (central inquiry is whetherNo. 98-50373 -2- the movant can afford the costs of the appeal without or deprivation of the necessities of life). Rumph provided the district court with an affidavit of poverty in support of his motion wherein he stated that he receives a monthly pension, but he did not give the amount of that pension. The district court did not abuse its wide discretion in denying Rumph’s IFP motion.
See Flowers v. Turbine Support Division , 507 F.2d 1242, 1244 (5th Cir. 1975).
AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 4251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-2089]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5955-5]


Clean Air Advisory Committee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established the 
Clean Air Act Advisory Committee (CAAAC) on November 19, 1990 to 
provide independent advice and counsel to EPA on policy issues 
associated with implementation of the Clean Air Act of 1990. The 
Committee advises on economic, environmental, technical, scientific, 
and enforcement policy issues.

OPEN MEETING POLICY: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. App. 2 section 10(a)(2), 
notice is hereby given that the Clean Air Act Advisory Committee will 
hold its next open meeting on Wednesday, February 18, 1998, from 8:30 
a.m., to 3:00 p.m. at Omni Shoreham Hotel, 2500 Calvert Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. Seating will be available on a first come, first 
served basis. Four Subcommittees will conduct meeting on Tuesday, 
February 17, 1998, at the same hotel at approximately the following 
time periods: (1) The Energy, Clean Air and Climate Change Subcommittee 
from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.; (2) the Linking Transportation, Land Use 
and Air Quality Concerns Subcommittee from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.; (3) 
the Permits/NSR/Toxics Subcommittee from 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.; and 
(4) the Economic Incentives and Regulatory Innovations Subcommittee 
from 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.

INSPECTION OF COMMITTEE DOCUMENTS: The Committee agenda and any 
documents prepared for the meeting will be publicly available at the 
meeting. Therefore, these documents, together with CAAAC meeting 
minutes, will be available by contacting Committee DFO Paul Rasmussen 
at (202) 260-6877.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Concerning this meeting of the CAAAC, please 
contact Paul Rasmussen, Office of Air and Radiation, US EPA (202) 260-
6877, Fax (202) 260-4185 or by mail at US EPA, Office of Air and 
Radiation (Mail Code 6102), Washington, D.C. 20460. If you would like 
to receive an agenda for the CAAAC meeting, please leave your fax 
number on Mr. Rasmussen's voice mail and it will be forwarded to you.

    Dated: January 22, 1998.
Robert D. Brenner,
Acting Assistant Administrator For Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 98-2089 Filed 1-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Ju ly 16 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk Ju ly 16 , 2019

15 9 865

- 7 ( 200 )

SEBASTIAN KUHLGER T, Conservator of

ELISABETH OSTENDORF,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 159865, 159866

v COA: 332442, 338363

Ct of Claims: 15

- 000047

- MZ

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY, and

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MICHIGAN

STATE UNIVERSITY,

Defendants,

and

UNITED EDUCATORS,

Intervening Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________________________

ELISABETH OSTENDORF,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

and

UNITED EDUCATORS,

Intervening Plaintiff

- Appellant,

and

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Intervening Plaintiff,

SC: 159867

v COA: 344533

MCAC: 17

- 000013

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY,

Defendant

- Appellee

.

________________________________________ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Inland Press Company to file a brief

amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on July 15 , 2019, is accepted for

filing.
Date: 16 April 2020

NSN: 8915-01-631-1846

12 June 2020 ************************

NSN: 8925-01-631-1846 (MCR) MONOGRAPH NO. M8T

 ************************ 

Item: Mint candy, Rings, Peppermint (Type VI, Style B, Flavor 2)

Document: CID A-A-20177F, Candy and Chocolate Confections and PKG&QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 120 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Intact candy rings shall have a hole in the center and shall be white in color.

Odor: Sweet peppermint.

Flavor: Sweet peppermint.

Texture: Firm, but not hard or brittle and dissolve slowly in the mouth.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Not round and/or intact. Worn edges, excessive crumble.

Odor: Diminished peppermint/mint, low sweet. Sour, chemical, alcohol.

Flavor: Diminished peppermint/mint, low sweet. Sour, chemical, alcohol.

Texture: Excessively hard to bite or powdery and brittle. Increased chalkiness or grittiness. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

NA
31 January 2008 ************************ 

NSN: 8920-01-537-8487 * MONOGRAPH NO: 3A16 

 ************************

Item: Dulce de Leche cake with white icing ( DDL) 

Document: PCR-C-024, Cakes, Brownies, and Mini Loaves, Packaged in a Polymeric Tray, 

Shelf Stable 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 200 Component Classification: Secondary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: 

Cake: fully baked, uniform cell (crumb) structure, and no evidence of compression 

streaks; medium golden brown surface and a pale, off-white crumb with small caramel 

drops distributed throughout. 

Icing: shiny, white. 

Odor: Cake: sweet, mild caramel. 

Icing: sweet. 

Flavor: Cake: sweet, mild caramel. 

Icing: sweet. 

Texture: Cake: dense, tender, moist, fine grain. 

Icing: smooth and easily spreadable. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Cake: darkened, orange tinged; dry and crumbly or excessively dense and moist. 

Icing: darkened; separated; oily. 

Odor: Cake: sour; off; heat stressed. 

Icing: rancid; off. 

Flavor: Cake: sour; off; heat stressed; lack of caramel. 

Icing: rancid; plastic. 

Texture: Cake: dry; stale; crumbly; dense, excessively moist. 

Icing: crystallized; weepy. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA 

Special Notes

NA
No. 11-6947.

#### David J. Balliette, Petitioner v. Wisconsin.

565 U.S. 1084, 132 S. Ct. 825,

181 L. Ed. 2d 535,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8809.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin denied.

Same case below, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 805 N.W.2d 334.
No. 11-7432.

#### Jousiawu J. Jones, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1131, 132 S. Ct. 1050,

181 L. Ed. 2d 771,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 242.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 263.
No. 11-7170.

#### Wanda Tirado, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1086, 132 S. Ct. 832,

181 L. Ed. 2d 539,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8797.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 11-7179.

#### Paul Mancuso, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1125, 132 S. Ct. 1031,

181 L. Ed. 2d 760,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 110.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 428 Fed. Appx. 73.
No. 11-7175.

#### Maxwell Garnett, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1078, 132 S. Ct. 837,

181 L. Ed. 2d 524,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8758.

December 5, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 27, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Same case below, 651 F.3d 578.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3275 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

340 Wetmore Avenue in Grand River, Ohio, as the ‘‘Lance Corporal 

Andy ‘Ace’ Nowacki Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 13, 2019 

Mr. JOYCE of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 340 Wetmore Avenue in Grand River, Ohio, 

as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Andy ‘Ace’ Nowacki Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL ANDY ‘‘ACE’’ NOWACKI POST 

4 OFFICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 340 Wetmore Avenue in Grand 

7 River, Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Lance 

8 Corporal Andy ‘Ace’ Nowacki Post Office’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3275 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lance Corporal Andy 

5 ‘Ace’ Nowacki Post Office’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3431 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3431

    To provide for the extension of the enforcement instruction on 
    supervision requirements for outpatient therapeutic services in 
        critical access and small rural hospitals through 2021.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2019

   Mrs. Axne (for herself and Mr. Smith of Nebraska) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
  Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide for the extension of the enforcement instruction on 
    supervision requirements for outpatient therapeutic services in 
        critical access and small rural hospitals through 2021.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ENFORCEMENT INSTRUCTION ON SUPERVISION 
              REQUIREMENTS FOR OUTPATIENT THERAPEUTIC SERVICES IN 
              CRITICAL ACCESS AND SMALL RURAL HOSPITALS THROUGH 2021.

    Section 1 of Public Law 113-198, as amended by section 1 of Public 
Law 114-112, section 16004 of Public Law 114-255, and section 51007 of 
Public Law 115-123, is amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by striking ``2017'' and 
        inserting ``2021''; and
            (2) by striking ``and 2017'' and inserting ``, 2017, 2020, 
        and 2021''.
                                 <all>
```
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

MEMORANDUM

DATE: October 7, 2015

TO: EPA Region 9 Rulemaking File for the BAAQMD NSR SIP Submittal

FROM: Ann Lyons, EPA Region 9, Air Division, Office of Regional Counsel

SUBJECT: October 7, 2015 Conference Phone Call regarding the EPA Proposed Limited 

Approval and Limited Disapproval of Regulation 2, Rules 1 & 2

ATTENDEES

• Ann Lyons, EPA Region 9, Office of Regional Counsel

• David Coursen, EPA Headquarters, Office of General Counsel 

• Sandy Crockett, BAAQMD Counsel’s Office

SUMMARY

Dave Coursen is an expert on minor NSR source programs and implementation of federal air 

regulations in Class I areas.

1. 40 CFR 51.160(a) and (b) – The BAAQMD rule needs language to prevent construction that 

would interfere with attainment or maintenance of NAAQS. District’s program does not 

include provisions that will show that a project will not interfere with attainment or 

maintenance of the NAAQS. EPA needs to clarify in the final FRN that we do not intend to 

use “will cause or contribute to” but intended to state “will not interfere with attainment or 

maintenance of the” NAAQS. 

HQ stated you can have categorical exemptions, but this does not appear to be the case in the 

District’s rule. Focus on other sources that are more important; in the end, the universe of 

exempted source will not interfere with attainment or maintenance of the NAAQS.

2. 40 CFR 51.307 – There is no bright line – this is case specific. FLMs have to protect air 

quality related values including visibility; the FLM’s FLAG guidance drives this. However,

BAAQMD is seeking a bright line rule for visibility, but cannot do this for the PSD 

increment:
Page 2 of 2

o Screening criteria based on BART guidelines and distance, and

o AQRVs are qualitative.

ATTACHMENTS

• None
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1265 

KA 10-01411 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, GREEN, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

JAMIE L. CRAWFORD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

CARR SAGLIMBEN LLP, OLEAN (JAY D. CARR OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

LORI PETTIT RIEMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LITTLE VALLEY (KELLY M. BALCOM

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Cattaraugus County Court (Larry M.

Himelein, J.), rendered April 12, 2010. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree and

assault in the first degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737).

Entered: December 23, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court