alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECOND AMENDMENT TO STEVIA FIRST CORP
2012 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


 


THIS SECOND AMENDMENT (“First Amendment”), effective
as of June 9, 2014, hereby amends the STEVIA FIRST CORP. 2012 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (the “Plan”) approved by the directors
and stockholders of Stevia First Corp. on the 3rd day of February 2012.


 


WHEREAS, this Second
Amendment was approved by a majority of the stockholders who submitted votes at the Stevia First Corp. annual stockholders meeting
held on June 9, 2014, and approved by the board of directors of Stevia First Corp. on March 26, 2014.


 


NOW THEREFORE, the
Plan is amended as follows:


 


		1.	Section 3(a) of the Plan
is hereby replaced in its entirety by the following:


 


(a) Subject to the provisions of Section 10,
below, the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued pursuant to all Awards (including Incentive Stock Options) is
eighteen million (18,000,000) Shares. The Shares to be issued pursuant to Awards may be authorized, but unissued, or reacquired
Common Stock.


 


		2.	All capitalized terms not
defined herein have the same meaning as in the Plan.


 


		3.	Any and all provisions
of the Plan not expressly modified herby shall remain in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS OF THE FOREGOING, the undersigned
hereby certifies this Second Amendment effective as of the date first written above.


 


	 	By:	/s/ Richard McKilligan
	 	Name:	Richard McKilligan
	 	Title:	Secretary
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6310

DWIGHT CHARLES WISHARD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

ALL UNITED STATES JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF TRUST

OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS; ALL UNITED STATES FEDERAL 

BUREAU OF PRISON OFFICE OF TRUST OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES OR 

AGENTS,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:16-ct-03173-F)

Submitted: May 25, 2017 Decided: May 31, 2017

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Dwight Charles Wishard, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Dwight Charles Wishard seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing in part Wishard’s civil action and 

denying Wishard’s motion for injunctive relief. We dismiss in part and affirm in part.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 

(2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The 

portion of the order that dismissed in part Wishard’s action is neither a final order nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss this part of the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

However, we have jurisdiction over that portion of the order that denied Wishard’s 

motion for preliminary injunctive relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) (2012). On appeal, 

we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). 

Because Wishard’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s 

disposition of this motion, Wishard has forfeited appellate review of that portion of the 

order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of injunctive relief.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART;

AFFIRMED IN PART
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3365 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to prohibit the Commission of Fine 

Arts from exercising authority over non-Federal property in the District 

of Columbia, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 19, 2019 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to prohibit the Commission of Fine Arts from exercising authority over nonFederal property in the District of Columbia, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Commission of Fine 

5 Arts District of Columbia Home Rule Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3365 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS FROM 

2 EXERCISING AUTHORITY OVER NON-FED3 ERAL PROPERTY IN THE DISTRICT OF CO4 LUMBIA. 

5 (a) LIMITING AUTHORITY OVER LOCATION OF STAT6 UES, FOUNTAINS, AND MONUMENTS.—Section 9102(a)(1) 

7 of title 40, United States Code, is amended by striking 

8 ‘‘District of Columbia’’ and inserting ‘‘District of Colum9 bia which are owned by the Federal Government’’. 

10 (b) CLARIFICATION OF LIMITATIONS ON AUTHOR11 ITY.—Section 9102(c) of such title is amended to read as 

12 follows: 

13 ‘‘(c) NONAPPLICATION.—The authority of the Com14 mission under this section does not apply to any of the 

15 following: 

16 ‘‘(1) The United States Capitol. 

17 ‘‘(2) Any building of the Library of Congress. 

18 ‘‘(3) Any building, property, or project which is 

19 owned by the District of Columbia. 

20 ‘‘(4) Any private building, property, or 

21 project.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS FOR FORM 10-Q**     I, Bruce R. Knooihuizen, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and principal financialofficer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Cellular Corporation,referred to as the registrant;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     AMERICAN CELLULAR CORPORATION   November 9, 2007 /s/ BRUCE R. KNOOIHUIZEN     Bruce R. Knooihuizen  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  (principal financial officer)
31
No. 11-6537.

#### Kofi Easterling, Petitioner v. Spencer Siarnicki, et al.

565 U.S. 1066, 132 S. Ct. 772,

181 L. Ed. 2d 495,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8610.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 435 Fed. Appx. 524.
No. 11-6560.

#### Marcus Weatherspoon, Petitioner v. E.K. McDaniel, Warden.

565 U.S. 1018, 132 S. Ct. 558,

181 L. Ed. 2d 403,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8062.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 439 Fed. Appx. 660.
No. 11-5335.

#### Kushal K. Shah, aka Gerron Lindsey, Petitioner v. Delaware.

565 U.S. 902, 132 S. Ct. 298,

181 L. Ed. 2d 181,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5522.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Delaware denied.

Same case below, 16 A.3d 938.
No. 11-5771.

#### Rico R. McCoy, Petitioner v. Kim T. Thomas, Interim Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 1102, 132 S. Ct. 871,

181 L. Ed. 2d 568,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8910.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 951, 132 S. Ct. 416, 181 L. Ed. 2d 272, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7428.
DIRTY, STAINED OR SMEARED 

Table IV, Insignificant Defect, “chalky” side seam – not scored. 

(Disregard number on can.)
15 January 2010 ****************************

NSN: 8940 01 572 7465 (BPC) * MONOGRAPH NO: 1A13

 ****************************

Item: Beef and Potatoes in Cream Gravy

Document: PCR-B-052, Beef and Potatoes in Cream Gravy, Packaged in a Polymeric Tray, 

Shelf Stable 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 210 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Product: Mixture of beef crumbles and potatoes in medium thick cream gravy.

Beef: Coarse, medium brown cooked beef color.

Potatoes: Cooked off-white to tan cooked color, dices.

Gravy: Cream to tan color, smooth, opaque.

Odor: Cooked beef and potatoes in a cream gravy, cooked milk.

Flavor: Cooked beef and potatoes in a slightly salty, mildly seasoned cream gravy.

Texture:

Beef: Slightly chewy, moist and tender, not grainy.

Potatoes: Slightly soft to slightly firm.

Gravy: Smooth and moderately thick.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Product may darken in color and may oil-off.

Odor: Stale, scorched.

Flavor: Product may become sour; loss of seasoning.

Texture: Beef may toughen, sauce may become thicker or thinner (due to oiling off); potatoes 

may become mushy.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

NA
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function

of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)

CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin
J. Cullum, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2017-B Owner Trust (the Exchange Act periodic
reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am
responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association

Date: June 26, 2018



By:

/s/ Kevin J. CullumKevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer ofNissan Motor Acceptance Corporation(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)




1
≥95% (3 awardees)

75% - 94% (10 awardees)

50% - 74% (23 awardees)

25% - 49% (11 awardees)

<25% (6 awardees)

No IIS (1 awardee)

No data (2 awardees)

Percentage of adults aged ≥19 years participating in an immunization 

information system -- United States, five cities§, and D.C., 2017

National Participation: 51% (excluding Territories)

Source: CY2017 IISAR

§ Chicago, IL; Houston, TX; New York City, NY; Philadelphia, PA; San Antonio, TX.
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3916 STANDARD 15.25 0.28 -0.97

Tolerance

1 3916A THIN BLUE 

LIMIT 16.70 0.27 -1.26 1.45 -0.01 -0.29 1.47

2 3916B GREEN LIMIT 15.47 -0.14 -0.62 0.22 -0.42 0.35 0.79

3 3916C ORANGE LIMIT 15.42 0.45 -0.74 0.17 0.17 0.23 0.44

4 3916D FULL ORANGE 

LIMIT 15.19 0.31 -0.45 -0.06 0.03 0.52 0.74

5

6

7

8

9

Shade Number BLACK 557 Piece/Roll Number 3916

DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT June 11, 2018

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, SUPPLEX, NYLON FOR JACKET 

AND PANTS, APFU

GL/PD 13-09

GL/PD 13-04

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 140 (Thursday, July 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43742-43743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18449]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 338]

Delegation of the Functions and Authorities of the Under 
Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs to the Assistant 
Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of State by the 
laws of the United States, including the Mutual Educational and 
Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, as amended (Fulbright-Hays Act), the 
United States Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948, as 
amended, and the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956, as 
amended, and delegated to me by Delegation of Authority 245-1, dated

[[Page 43743]]

February 13, 2009, I hereby delegate to the Assistant Secretary of 
State for Educational and Cultural Affairs, to the extent authorized by 
law, all authorities vested in the Under Secretary of State for Public 
Diplomacy and Public Affairs, including all authorities vested in the 
Secretary of State that have been or may be delegated or re-delegated 
to that Under Secretary.
    Any authorities covered by this delegation may also be exercised by 
the Secretary of State, the Deputy Secretary, and the Deputy Secretary 
for Management and Resources. Nothing in this delegation of authority 
shall be deemed to supersede or revoke any existing delegation of 
authority, which shall remain in full force and effect during and after 
this delegation.
    Any act or other authority related to this delegation of authority 
shall be deemed to be such act or other authority as amended from time 
to time.
    This delegation of authority shall expire upon the appointment and 
entry upon duty of a subsequently-appointed individual to serve as 
Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs.
    This delegation of authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

    Dated July 7, 2011.
Thomas R. Nides,
Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources.
[FR Doc. 2011-18449 Filed 7-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
No. 11-6116.

#### Michael A. Singleton, Petitioner v. Ten Unidentified United States Marshals.

565 U.S. 1102, 132 S. Ct. 871,

181 L. Ed. 2d 569,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 9013.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 985, 132 S. Ct. 513, 181 L. Ed. 2d 361, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7885.
No. 11-164.

#### Wanda J. Harley, Petitioner v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General.

565 U.S. 1092, 132 S. Ct. 844,

181 L. Ed. 2d 548,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8863.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

*549Same case below, 416 Fed. Appx. 748.
No. D-2602.

#### In the Matter of Disbarment of Paul C. Droz.

565 U.S. 975, 132 S. Ct. 546,

181 L. Ed. 2d 392,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7604.

October 31, 2011.

Disbarment entered.

Former order, 564 U.S. 1034, 131 S. Ct. 3087, 180 L. Ed. 2d 908, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 4978.
No. 10-10786.

#### Richard Earl Shere, Jr., Petitioner v. Florida.

565 U.S. 849, 132 S. Ct. 171,

181 L. Ed. 2d 83,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6254.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 57 So. 3d 847.
Chromium Metal Offering

Item # Location Drums Origin

Unit of Measure................... Pounds Cutoff Time for Receipt.........

May 3, 2023

May 4, 2023

12:00pm

FISCAL YEAR 2023

Basic Ordering Agreement... Chromium Metal Date of Posting...................

Commodity.................................Chromium Metal Date for Receipt of Quotes....

Type Lot #

Totals

Net Weight ST

NOTE: Minimum bid is one entire line item.

*

All quotes must be submitted through the DLA-Strategic Materials Sales Portal

and quoters must be pre-approved in the site to participate

DLA - Strategic Materials Sales Portal

118.07 ST 236,144 Lbs

Quantity Offered/Minimum Bid

0246a Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 008 45 GERMANY 10.178 ST 20356 Lbs

0246b Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 008 45 GERMANY 10.178 ST 20356 Lbs

0246c Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 008 35 GERMANY 7.916 ST 15832 Lbs

0267b Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 012B 35 GERMANY 7.91 ST 15814 Lbs

0274d Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 018 20 UNITED KINGDOM 6.75 ST 13496 Lbs

0274e Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 018 20 UNITED KINGDOM 6.73 ST 13469 Lbs

0275a Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 021 28 UNITED KINGDOM 9.45 ST 18899 Lbs

0275b Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 021 28 UNITED KINGDOM 9.46 ST 18913 Lbs

0275c Aluminothermic HAMMOND, IN 021 28 UNITED KINGDOM 9.46 ST 18929 Lbs

0335a Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 7 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs

0335b Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 7 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs

0335c Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 7 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs

0335d Electrolytic HAMMOND, IN 7 28 DOMESTIC 10.01 ST 20020 Lbs
NUMBER 13-07-00355-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

BRYAN BREWER, Appellant,

v.

CAROL L. BREWER, Appellee.

_____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 135th District Court of Victoria County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants’ brief in the above cause was due on September 12, 2007. On

September 25, 2007, and again on January 3, 2008, the Court notified appellant that the

appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant

reasonably explained his failure to file the brief and the appellee was not significantly
2

injured by the failure to timely file the brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b),(c). Appellant

failed to respond to either notice. 

Accordingly, we DISMISS the appeal for want of prosecution and failure to comply

with notices from this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b),(c).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 

filed this the 20th day of March, 2008.
No. 11-6854.

#### Tony L. Vann, Petitioner v. Dennis L. Wieneke, et al.

565 U.S. 1118, 132 S. Ct. 1009,

181 L. Ed. 2d 747,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 273,

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 433 Fed. Appx. 679.
DENT 

Table IV, Defect No. 110. Major defect. Severe end seam dent 

likely to affect the usability of the container.
# C_2016235EN.01000601.xml

| 29.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/6

---

Special Report No 11/2016

‘Strengthening administrative capacity in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: limited progress in a difficult context’

(2016/C 235/06)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 11/2016 ‘Strengthening administrative capacity in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: limited progress in a difficult context’ has just been published.

‘Strengthening administrative capacity in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: limited progress in a difficult context’

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu or on EU Bookshop: https://bookshop.europa.eu

---
No. 11-5814.

#### Robert Mark Purchase, Petitioner v. Florida.

565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1082,

181 L. Ed. 2d 800,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 467.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

*801Former decision, 565 U.S. 952, 132 S. Ct. 419, 181 L. Ed. 2d 273, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7442.
No. 11-7845.

#### Eddie Hill, Petitioner v. James Cross, Jr., Warden.

565 U.S. 1174, 132 S. Ct. 1127,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1010,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 671.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.