alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
APP B

 DSCPM 4155.2

************************

• MONOGRAPH NO.: 4A1

************************

ITEM: Jelly, Apple (JLA)

NSN: 8930-01-225-9799 ITEM SPECIFICATION: MIL-C-44068

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 75

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

 APPEARANCE: Amber color, exhibiting slight weeping of fluid

from the gel phase (slight synereis).

 ODOR: Sweet, apple, slightly fermented.

 FLAVOR: Moderately sweet, pronounced apple, slightly

fermented.

 TEXTURE: Smooth, firm gel except slight weeping is

permissible.

 ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT 70 DEGREES F: 66 months

 80 DEGREES F: 54 months

 90 DEGREES F: 42 months

 100 DEGREES F: 30 months

EXPECTED DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

 APPEARANCE: Dark amber to decidedly brown; moderate

syneresis.

 ODOR: Moderately fermented, cider-like.

 FLAVOR: Extreme loss of apple flavor; scorched, carmelized,

fermented.

 TEXTURE: Moderate to extreme loss of gel structure, moderate

to extreme syneresis, liquified (total loss of gel structure).

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: Do not knead package prior

to opening as this will damage the gel structure. Open package

by cutting off three seals and laying it open so as to expose the

product. If mold is noted or suspected examine the pouch very

closely for tears, cuts, or holes. If package integrity has been

compromised, score a defect against the package and note the

finding of the mold in the remarks. To check product for weeping, place it on

a flat smooth surface such as a paper plate or egg breakout dish.

SPECIAL NOTES: The degree of loss of apple flavor can be

expected to vary with the vendor and DOP. Slight loss of flavor

should be expected even under ideal storage conditions and should

not be scored. Flexible package is designed to yield

approximately 1.0 ounce of product (28 grams)
No. 11-7411.

#### Herbert Sperling, Petitioner v. David Ebbert, Warden.

565 U.S. 1130, 132 S. Ct. 1048,

181 L. Ed. 2d 769,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 350.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 68.
Vaccines for Preteens 

and Teens: What 

Parents Should Know

All boys and girls need three vaccines at ages 11-12

to protect against serious diseases. Preteens and teens 

should also get a yearly flu vaccine, as well as any 

vaccines they missed when they were younger.

What vaccines does 

my child need?

MenACWY

Dose 1: Ages 11-12

Dose 2: Age 16

Meningococcal vaccines protect against a type of bacteria that can cause serious 

illnesses. The two most common types of illnesses include infections of the lining 

of the brain and spinal cord (meningitis) and bloodstream. All preteens should 

get the meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACWY). Teens may also receive a 

serogroup B meningococcal vaccine (MenB), preferably at 16 through 18 years old.

HPV

Dose 1: Ages 11-12

Dose 2: 6 -12 months later

HPV vaccine protects both girls and boys from future infections that can lead 

to certain types of cancer. Children who get their first dose on or after their 15th 

birthday will need three doses.

Tdap

Dose 1: Ages 11-12

Tdap vaccine protects against three serious diseases: tetanus, diphtheria, and 

pertussis (whooping cough).

Flu

Yearly Dose:

Ages 6 months and older

Flu vaccine helps protect against seasonal flu. Even healthy preteens and 

teens can get very sick from flu and spread it to others. The best time to get an 

annual flu vaccine is before flu begins causing illness in your community, ideally 

before the end of October. Flu vaccination is beneficial as long as flu viruses are 

circulating, even in January or later.

When should my child 

be vaccinated?

A good time to get these vaccines is during a yearly wellness check. Your child can also get these vaccines 

at a physical exam required for school, sports, or camp. If your child missed any doses of recommended 

vaccines, ask your doctor or nurse about getting them now.

Are these vaccines safe? These vaccines have been studied very carefully and are very safe. They can cause mild side effects, like 

soreness or redness in the part of the arm where the shot is given. Some preteens or teens might faint after 

getting a shot. Sitting or lying down when getting a shot, and then for about 15 minutes after the shot, can 

help prevent fainting. Serious side effects are rare. It is very important to tell the doctor or nurse if your child 

has any serious allergies, including allergies to yeast, latex, or chicken eggs, before they receive any vaccines.

Can I get help paying for 

these vaccines?

Most health insurance plans cover routine vaccinations. The Vaccines for Children (VFC) program also 

provides vaccines for children 18 years and younger who are uninsured, underinsured, Medicaid-eligible, 

American Indian, or Alaska Native. Learn more at www.cdc.gov/Features/VFCprogram.

Talk to your child’s doctor or nurse about the vaccines

your child needs or visit www.cdc.gov/vaccines/parents

Last updated JULY 2019
No. 11-6621.

#### DeAndre Cooper, Petitioner v. David Wise, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 1067, 132 S. Ct. 777,

181 L. Ed. 2d 498,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8558.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 426 Fed. Appx. 689.
**
Exhibit 35.1 

Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation 

**NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

The undersigned, Kevin J. Cullum, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows: 

(1) The undersigned has caused a reviewof the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and ServicingAgreement, dated as of August 23, 2017 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables2017-B Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and 

(2) To the best of theundersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forpublicly-issued asset-backed securities. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 27th day of June, 2019. 

 

/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer**
No. 11-6012.

#### Henry Callaway, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 927, 132 S. Ct. 361,

181 L. Ed. 2d 229,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7043.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 11-6441.

#### Lee Scott Clemons, Petitioner v. Carol E. Monroe, Assistant Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 1064, 132 S. Ct. 764,

181 L. Ed. 2d 492,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8498,

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 423 Fed. Appx. 362.
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3875 STANDARD 54.63 4.29 17.51

Tolerance

1 3875A VIOLET LIMIT 55.11 4.57 17.47 0.48 0.28 -0.04 0.41

2 3875B BLUE/GREEN 

LIMIT 54.53 4.00 17.4 -0.10 -0.29 -0.11 0.24

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

Shade Number M-1 KHAKI Piece/Roll Number 3875

DLA/MARINE CORP SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT July 20, 2017

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, TROPICAL, 

POLYESTER/WOOL, 75/25 MIL-C-29404B
No. 11-5430.

#### Ronald David Sutherland, Petitioner v. Texas.

565 U.S. 907, 132 S. Ct. 310,

181 L. Ed. 2d 190,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6115.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, denied.
No. 11-202.

#### Mitchell Sigg, et al., Petitioners v. Linda L. Sigg, et al.

565 U.S. 1059, 132 S. Ct. 759,

181 L. Ed. 2d 483,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8470.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kansas denied.

Same cases below, 238 P.3d 331.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 146 (Thursday, July 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20328]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3105]


State of New York; Amendment #1

    The above numbered declaration is hereby amended to reflect the 
correct declaration numbers for this disaster. The number assigned to 
this disaster for physical damage is 310506, and for economic injury 
the numbers are 993200 for New York and 993300 for Pennsylvania. All 
other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for filing 
applications for physical damage is September 5, 1998 and for economic 
injury the termination date is April 7, 1999.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)

    Dated: July 17, 1998.
Bernard Kulik,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-20328 Filed 7-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3915 STANDARD 37.63 -3.44 12.32

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

DLA/MARINE CORP SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT July 21, 2017

Fabric Nomenclature SLEEPING BAG, TYPE I, SIZE 2, USMC GL-PD-14-01

Shade Number OD GREEN 522 Piece/Roll Number 3915
No. 11-7019.

#### Thomas Von Ryburn, Petitioner v. Anthony Ramos, Warden.

565 U.S. 1097, 132 S. Ct. 855,

181 L. Ed. 2d 557,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8900.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 1, 2009 

s0325 

Order 

 

April 1, 2009 

137563 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137563 

 COA: 287028 

Saginaw CC: 07-028993-FJ 

BRIAN SCOTT HERNANDEZ, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 19, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the sentence of the Saginaw Circuit Court, and we 

REMAND this case to the trial court for resentencing. Under MCL 769.1(3), the trial 

court must conduct a hearing at a juvenile’s sentencing to determine whether to impose a 

sentence that commits the juvenile to an institution or agency described in the youth 

rehabilitation services act, 1974 PA 150, or to impose an adult sentence. If the prosecutor 

and the defendant agree, the sentencing court may waive the hearing requirements of 

MCL 769.1(3). If the hearing is waived, the court may place the juvenile on probation 

and commit the juvenile to an institution or agency described in the youth rehabilitation 

services act, but the court is barred from imposing any other sentence provided by law for 

an adult offender. MCL 769.1(4). Here, the hearing required by MCL 769.1(3) was 

waived, but an adult sentence was imposed, contrary to the provisions of MCL 769.1(4). 

We do not retain jurisdiction.
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of theglobe.com, inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward A.
Cespedes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated:
      November 9, 2009
                  By:
                  /s/ 
      Edward A.
      CespedesEdward
      A. Cespedes
                    Chief
      Financial Officer
4oz 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

#‘ebrtmrr Z, 1946, 

8 lVqUr8t t0 

nlon T8r,U88C o? 

Uiba h88 h8d 

8108 in 8 OJlbe rm to pa88 

oo~.lsslon or board, of 

the bad of ruoh StrUS klongin& to the Strtm of mm8-” 

The ~O:i8tltUtlOn Of the St8tO Or ‘ItX88 tn AltiOh Xvf, 

So o tio n 60a , deo la ror that ìThO oocurrrblon l d dermlopaent of 

all of the neturel reaouroa8 of thla Ztato, inoluding . . . . 

‘wters CC ltfl rivers an6 atree-ia, fcr lrrlpatio3, rarer a3j a.11 

other wefti ;ur:osee, . . . . era eeck sn: all hereby dsclsrsd 

~ubllc ri@.ts end duties erd the :efls:8turt) at1811 gas8 all euch 

laws 88 my bo appropriate thsrato.* 
403 

QOJSS. Fish and Oyster ComxIssIon - Pags 2 

Unless the i+sc;lslaturs, pursuant to its oonstltutional authority ovsr public watsre and water OOUTSOB has 

apowered a stats dspartmsnt, oopMIssion, or board to do an 

sot, to-wit, grant a per&t to a landowner to blast a natural 

obstruotion in a pub110 stream ror the purpose or allowing 

rlsh to pass rrssly beyond the point or obetruotion, no stats 

aganoy aan lawfully grant suoh a permit. 38 Tax. Jur. 836 

in agrooment statssr *;owsr In reapec t to Stats property 

rI&ht8 I8 vsstsd In ths Lsgialaturs, and ths Lsgislaturs 

alone nay l x oro leths s power neosssary to the snjoymsnt and 

protection 0r thoss ri*te by the enaotixsnt of 8tatutse ror 

that purpol3s*~ 

The Awtln Court of Clvll Ap sals reomtly stated 

the law in CorzSllU8 vs. RaIlmid C0pm ! 881011, st 61, 188 

s. ii. (2d) 412, to be thab 'Ths gonsral ruls Is ~011 srttlsd 

that board8 or oomIL.aions which am orsatUrs8 of t&s statute8 

oan srsro188 only such authority aa is oOnisrr8d uNn them by 

law in olsar an4 express Bsrquags, and that authority will not 

be oonstrusd as tiling oonrerrsd by implloatlon.~ 

X thOrOU@: SXt%RiLE%tiOn Of Titls 67, RSViSSd Civil 

statutes or Texas, relating in part to the powers 0r the Cafe, 

Fish and Oyster Comi3slon, of Chagter 1, Tit18 128, B8vIs8d 

Civil Statutes or Texas, setting rorth ths powsrs or the Board 

0r iiatsr Englnsers, and or 611 other laws relating to ths State's 

rights In pub110 waters and rivsr beds, discloses that tis LagIslsturs has not authorAsd any oom-Assion, board or department 

to Issus a permit to a landowner to rsLov8 a natural obstruotlon 

fn a public strew. 

. 10rrS Very trUiy
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Financial Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I C. Peter Bardin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/ C. Peter Bardin

C. Peter Bardin
Chief Financial Officer
August 8, 2002
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSEPH SILKY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1638

[November 1, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael Rothschild, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 07-1182 CF10A.

Joseph Silky, Crawfordville, pro se.

No brief filed for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
ITEM: Peanut Butter (PBT) MONOGRAPH NO.: KE1
VENDOR: Thermo-Pak

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE: 250 to 258 Kilocalories.

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Tan to reddish brown, smooth, glossy, thick consistency.

ODOR: Fresh roasted peanuts.
FLAVOR: Fresh roasted peanuts; balanced sweet/salty peanut flavor, no bitterness.
TEXTURE: Very slightly grainy to smooth; sticky mouth feel.

DEFECTS LIKELY TO OCCUR:

APPEARANCE: Darkening of color, moderately oily/oiled off.

ODOR: Musty, rancid, stale..
FLAVOR: Moderately bitter, rancid, stale.
TEXTURE: Moderate oiling off (separation of the emulsion); hard and dry core, or

product surrounded by extreme oiling off (product cannot be kneaded
back into emulsion).

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: For open package inspection, evaluate half
of the samples from the same producer without kneading and the other half after kneading the
contents IAW package instructions. This will assist the inspector in assessing the effect oil
separation has on the product before and after kneading.

SPECIAL NOTES: Peanut butter packages have a history of being abused during the filling
process. Packages should be kneaded and observed for leakage/bursting. Leaks, if they occur,
should be identified as to location (i.e., body of pouch, side seal, end seal at interface between
product edge of the seal of the body of the pouch). Due to the nature of the product and
processing methodology used, the product may exhibit a light burnt/overcooked, or slightly oily
odor or flavor. This product often has oily films on the surface of the package. If oily, observe
package closely for tears, cuts or holes. If package integrity has not been compromised, note the
oily package in the remarks, but do not score it as a defect unless it significantly affects the
package or packaging of other components.

55
No. 11-5245.

#### Luis Alberto Gonzalez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 897, 132 S. Ct. 286,

181 L. Ed. 2d 172,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5426.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
No. 11M56.

#### Sealed Petitioner, Petitioner v. Sealed Respondent, et al.

565 U.S. 1108, 132 S. Ct. 1072,

181 L. Ed. 2d 729,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 241.

January 9, 2012.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 28, 2009 

p0921 

Order 

 

September 28, 2009 

138383 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138383 

 COA: 288431 

Kent CC: 05-011508-FC 

RAFAEL JOSEPH, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 23, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
This scan shows the darkening of the center Time Temperature Indicator (TTI) ring due to cycle

temperature with a daily fluctuation between 130F and 85F, which was logged in MIL-VANS in Isummer of 2006. Duartion of test was 6 weeks.
No. 11-5032.

#### Joseph Pope, Petitioner v. Mark Bernard, et al.

565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1080,

181 L. Ed. 2d 798,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 445.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 886, 132 S. Ct. 261, 181 L. Ed. 2d 152, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5323.
No. 11-6106.

#### Curtis W. King, Petitioner v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 954, 132 S. Ct. 428,

181 L. Ed. 2d 278,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7337.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 433 Fed. Appx. 146.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 20322 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
LESLIE NICOLE BREAUX, also known as Leslie Nicole Adams, also known as Leslie Nicole Adams

- Breaux , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16

- CR

- 277

- 1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Leslie Nicole Breaux has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Breaux has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Breaux’s claims of ineffective assistance of

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 9, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-20322 Document: 00514950370 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/09/2019No. 18

- 20322

2 counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to
collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014 )

. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Breaux ’ s response . We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the a ppeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-20322 Document: 00514950370 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/09/2019