alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
24 April 2009 ***************************

NSN: 8940-01-562-9557 (CSF) * MONOGRAPH NO: 1A1P

 ***************************

Item: Chicken Stir Fry

Document: PCR-C-076 Chicken Stir Fry (White Chicken, Vegetables, and Sauce), Packaged in a 

Polymeric Tray, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 181 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

General: Mixture of whole muscle chicken breast meat strips, green beans, water 

chestnuts and baby corn in sauce.

Chicken: Random length chicken breast meat strips, cooked chicken color and may 

have a golden brown color from absorbed sauce.

Sauce: Slightly thick and golden brown in color with sesame seeds and visible flecks of 

spices.

Green beans: Cut style green beans with cooked green bean color.

Water chestnuts: Disk shaped and off white in color and may have a golden brown 

color from absorbed sauce.

Baby corn: Whole or cut baby corn cobs of random length; yellow in color and may 

have a golden brown color from absorbed sauce.

Odor: Cooked chicken breast meat and vegetables in a mildly spicy Asian style sauce.

Flavor: Cooked chicken breast meat and vegetables in a mildly spicy Asian style sauce.

Texture:

Chicken: Moist and tender, a cooked whole muscle chicken breast meat texture.

Sauce: Slightly thick and smooth with sesame seeds.

Green beans: Slightly soft to slightly firm.

Water chestnuts: Crunchy.

Baby corn: Slightly soft to slightly firm.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance:

General: Darkened sauce and vegetables, dry darkened chicken.

Sauce: Separated sauce.

Odor: Scorched, off, rancid.

Flavor: Scorched, off, rancid.
24 April 2009 ***************************

NSN: 8940-01-562-9557 (CSF) * MONOGRAPH NO: 1A1P

 ***************************

Texture: Dry chicken, overly soft vegetables.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures: 

NA

Special Notes: 

NA
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 150 (Wednesday, August 5, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 41766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20814]



[[Page 41766]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 98-140, RM-9294]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Pauls Valley, OK

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by Wright 
& Wright, Inc., seeking the allotment of Channel 283A to Pauls Valley, 
OK, as the community's first or second local FM service. Channel 283A 
can be allotted to Pauls Valley in compliance with the Commission's 
minimum distance separation requirements with a site restriction of 2.9 
kilometers (1.8 miles) southwest, at coordinates 34-43-06 North 
Latitude; 97-14-15 West Longitude, to avoid a short-spacing to Station 
KMGL, Channel 281C, Oklahoma City, OK.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before September 21, 1998, and 
reply comments on or before October 6, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: Roy 
Floyd, Vice-President, Wright & Wright, Inc., P.O. Box 248, Bonham, TX 
75418 (Petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie K. Shapiro, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 98-140, adopted July 22, 
1998, and released July 31, 1998. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, 
Washington, DC 20036.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 98-20814 Filed 8-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
No. 11-397.

#### Rickie Dawson York, Petitioner v. Texas.

565 U.S. 1156, 132 S. Ct. 1093,

181 L. Ed. 2d 977,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 759.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.

Same case below, 342 S.W.3d 528.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      15,866,544
<SECURITIES>                                 3,243,668
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,214,074
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,164,212
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,915,082
<PP&E>                                      52,853,175
<DEPRECIATION>                              26,972,335
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             100,917,398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,776,458
<BONDS>                                    100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,871
<OTHER-SE>                                (15,001,323)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               100,917,398
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,505,337
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,219,333
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,179
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,156,650
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,593,165)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (3,612,629)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,662,982)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,662,982)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.60)
        

</TABLE>
1

The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-1466

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Southern District of Iowa.

*

Alberto Zaragoza Becerra, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: October 21, 2010

Filed: November 17, 2010

___________

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Alberto Becerra challenges the within-Guidelinesrange sentence the district court1

 imposed following his guilty plea to conspiring to

distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and

846. Counsel has submitted a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

in which he argues that the district court abused its discretion in sentencing Becerra

and should have sentenced him to a below-Guidelines-range prison term.
-2-

We hold that the district court, in sentencing Becerra, did not commit any

procedural error, because the court correctly calculated the advisory Guidelines range,

properly considered only relevant section 3553(a) factors, and explained its reasons

for the within-Guidelines-range sentence, and that the court did not abuse its

discretion by imposing an unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster, 572

F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (in reviewing sentence for reasonableness, this

court first ensures district court committed no significant procedural error, such as

improperly calculating Guidelines range, treating Guidelines as mandatory, failing to

consider § 3553(a) factors, sentencing based on clearly erroneous facts, or failing to

adequately explain chosen sentence, then considers substantive reasonableness of

sentence under abuse-of-discretion standard; appellate presumption of reasonableness

may be applied to within-Guidelines-range sentence); see also United States v. Haack,

403 F.3d 997, 1003-04 (8th Cir. 2005) (defining ways in which abuse of discretion

may occur).

After reviewing the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
No. 11-6725.

#### Raymond Serrano, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1030, 132 S. Ct. 562,

181 L. Ed. 2d 416,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7956.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of *417certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 411 Fed. Appx. 253.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 150 (Wednesday, August 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41889-41890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20807]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart Q During 
the Week Ending July 24, 1998

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
Q of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 
CFR 302.1701 et seq.). The due date for Answers, Conforming 
Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each 
application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: OST-98-4127.
    Date Filed: July 20, 1998.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify 
Scope: August 17, 1998.
    Description: Application of Sabena S.A., Sabena Belgian World 
Airlines pursuant to 49 U.S.C. Section 41302 and Subpart Q, applies for 
a foreign air carrier permit to authorize it to provide scheduled 
foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail from points 
behind Belgium via Belgium and intermediate points to a point or points 
in the United States and beyond.

    Docket Number: OST-98-4148.
    Date Filed: July 22, 1998.

[[Page 41890]]

    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify 
Scope: August 19, 1998.
    Description: Application of Voyageur Airways Limited pursuant to 49 
U.S.C. Section 41302 and Subpart Q, applies for a foreign air carrier 
permit to provide scheduled air transportation of persons, property and 
mail between any point or points in Canada, and any point or points in 
the United States.

    Docket Number: OST-98-4162.
    Date Filed: July 23, 1998.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify 
Scope: August 20, 1998.
    Description: Application of Air Luxor, S.A. pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 
Section 41301 and Subpart Q of the Regulations, applies for a foreign 
air carrier permit to engage in charter foreign air transportation of 
persons, property and mail between points in Portugal and points in the 
United States, together with authority to operate fifth freedom charter 
transportation between points in the United States and points in third 
countries in accordance with Part 207 of the Regulations.
Dorothy W. Walker,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 98-20807 Filed 8-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
Exhibit 10.12


 


Purchase Agreement


 


Party A: Bin County Weicheng Rural Credit
Cooperative Agency


Party B: Heilongjiang Weikang Bio-Technology
Co., Ltd.


 


I. Party A shall transfer to Party B the
ownership of the office building located at No.365 Chengde Street Daowai District, Harbin, with net area 4012.66 square meters
(based on physical measurement), and construction coefficient 1.51. The total transfer price is RMB 96,000,000.00.


 


II. After the agreement is executed, Party
A shall cooperate Party B to go through relevant procedures such as ownership transfer. Party A shall provide relevant real property
procedures to cooperate with Party B and Party B shall be responsible for the transaction fees. Party A shall be responsible for
all the fees before the agreement is executed.


 


III. Party A shall cooperate with Party
B to handle relevant procedures of property maintenance fee payment. Party B shall be responsible for the property maintenance
fee after this agreement becomes effective.


 


VI. Party A shall provide Party B with
a complete building construction blueprint, including construction, water heating, fire escape, electric lighter.


 


V. Party B shall remit the payment to the
account appointed by Party A within 15 days after the agreement is executed. This agreement will expire after 15 days upon execution.
Breach of this provision would incur a penalty of RMB 500,000.


 


VI. Party A shall provide Party B with
documentation necessary for the ownership transfer within 10 days after the payment by Party A is received by Party B. Breach of
this provision would incur a penalty of RMB 500,000.


 


VII. Party A shall confirm that this building
is not a collateral to any debt.


 


VIII. Party A does not have the Real Estate
Ownership Certificate to this building, and the ownership is based upon the purchase and sales agreement between Party and Harbin
Juxing City Development Co., Ltd. Party A shall cooperate with Party B in the ownership transfer and accommodate Party B reasonable
time in preparing the documentation.


 


IX. For issues not stipulated in this agreement,
both parties shall resolve through negotiation. If negotiation fails, either party has the right to bring a lawsuit to the local
court.


 


X. This agreement shall be held in four
copies. Each party shall preserve two copies with equal legal effect.


 


Party A: Bin County Weicheng Rural Credit
Cooperative


 


Legal Representative: /s/


Party B: Heilongjiang Weikang Bio-Technology
Co., Ltd


 


Legal Representative: /s/


 


 


Date: September 20th 2011
No. 11-6335.

#### Daniel B., Petitioner v. Sunapee School District.

565 U.S. 1116, 132 S. Ct. 1002,

181 L. Ed. 2d 744,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 358.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Hampshire denied.

Same case below, 162 N.H. 38, 27 A.3d 689.
<pre>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB/A  of  Vote
Power Corporation  (the  "Company")  for  the  quarter  ended  September 30,
2005 (the "Report"),  the  undersigned  hereby  certify  in  their  capacities
as Chief Executive Officer  and Chief  Financial Officer  of the  Company,
respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,  as adopted pursuant to
Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: January 14, 2008            By:  /S/ Inti Shaikh
                                   -------------------------
                                   Inti Shaikh
                                   CEO and
                                   Secretary/Treasurer and
                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                   (principal financial officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures
that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 19

- 00472

- CV

Willie A. Trent, Appellant

v.

Alex Brown, Appellee

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF BELL COUNTY NO. 85237, THE HONOR ABLE JEANNE PARKER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Will ie A . Trent has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appea l, explaining

that the parties have settled their dispute

. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex.

R. App. P. 42.1(a) (1).

_______________________________ ___________ Thomas J. Baker , Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly

Dismissed o n App ellant ’ s Motion

Filed: December 1 8 , 2019
No. 10-10941.

#### Thelma Williams, Petitioner v. Correctional Officer Moore.

565 U.S. 1055, 132 S. Ct. 795,

181 L. Ed. 2d 477,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8509.

November 28, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
No. 11-7599.

#### Eduardo A. Trevino, Petitioner v. Ernest Gutierrez, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 1167, 132 S. Ct. 1116,

181 L. Ed. 2d 997,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 840,

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 426 Fed. Appx. 327.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 147 (Friday, July 31, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20476]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 2413-034]


Georgia Power Company; Notice of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

July 27, 1998.
    An environmental assessment (EA), is available for public review. 
The EA was prepared for an application filed by the Georgia Power 
Company, on September 25, 1997, requesting the Commission's 
authorization to permit a water withdrawal facility to be installed 
within the project boundary to withdraw up to 4 million gallons of 
water per day from the project reservoir. The water will be withdrawn 
by the City of Madison, Georgia to be treated and used for human 
consumption.
    The EA finds that approval of the application would not constitute 
a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human 
environment. The Wallace Dam Project is located on the Oconee River, in 
Putnam, Morgan, Oconee, Oglethorpe, Greene, and Hancock Counties, 
Georgia.
    The EA was written by staff in the Office of Hydropower Licensing, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Copies of the EA can be viewed at 
the Commission's Reference and Information Center, 888 First Street, 
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426. Copies can also be obtained by calling 
the project manager, Pete Yarrington, at (202) 219-2939.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20476 Filed 7-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 11-7803.

#### Alexander Antonio Simmons, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1170, 132 S. Ct. 1124,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1002,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 691.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 445 Fed. Appx. 653.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 1491

_____________________________
J OSHUA D AVID C AREY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 1492

_____________________ ________
J OSHUA D AVID C AREY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Mark Borello , Judge

. May 3, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.2 M AKAR , W INOKUR , and W INSOR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Terry P. Roberts of the Law Office of Terry P. Roberts, Special Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley M oody , Attorney General, and Barbara Debelius, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

 ************************ 

 MONOGRAPH No. BS12

 ************************ 

ITEM: Hominy Grits, White, Quick Cooking, Enriched, Type 1, Style B, Flavor 1, 24 oz. 

Container 

SPECIFICATION: CID A-A 20035B NSN: 8920 01 079 1585 

COMPONENT CLASSIFICATION: Primary 

 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM: 

APPEARANCE: Typical of cooked grits. 

ODOR: Characteristic corn odor. No foreign odors such as rancid, bitter, raw, starchy, 

sour, etc. 

FLAVOR: Characteristic corn flavor. No foreign flavors such as, rancid, bitter, raw, 

starchy, sour, etc. 

TEXTURE: Typical of cooked grits. No clumps. 

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 18 months. 

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES: 

APPEARANCE: May darken. 

ODOR: May detect foreign odors such as rancid, bitter, raw, starchy, sour, etc. 

FLAVOR: May detect foreign flavors such as rancid, bitter, raw, starchy, sour, etc. 

TEXTURE: May clump. 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None. 

SPECIAL NOTES: None
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**JOSE LOPEZ,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 570 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 3rd day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.**
Ferrari Meeting With 

EPA

May 3, 2012

Ann Arbor, MI
Background of SVM Regulatory Issue

 Ferrari has historically been considered a “Small 

Volume Manufacturer” (SVM) by EPA and CARB for 

tailpipe, evaporative, and OBD standards and by NHTSA 

for safety standards

 Ferrari’s comments on the MYs 2012-2016 proposal 

requested continuation of this status

 In January 2010, EPA told Ferrari that it could not 

address this request in the MYs 2012-2016 rules, but 

would do so in the MYs 2017-2025 proposal

In subsequent meetings with EPA and CARB, Ferrari has 

identified continuation of SVM status as essential to 

its on-going operations
Key Points For SVM Regulatory Provision

 No adverse comments on the “operational 

independence” concept

 VW noted criteria may be too stringent

 No comments from NGOs

 Ferrari Ferrari has noted issues regarding regarding 

“conventional” emissions from the very early 

meetings with EPA late 2009 and early 2010

 Ferrari’s proposed regulatory revision to 40 CFR 

§ 86.1838(b) would be generally applicable to 

the SVM “aggregation” provisions

 See Attachment 1 to Ferrari comments to EPA