alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 142 (Friday, July 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19766]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-303-001]


Caprock Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

July 20, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 14, 1998, Caprock Pipeline Company 
(Caprock Pipeline), tendered for filing to be part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, Substitute Fourth Revised Sheet No. 
29A, to be effective August 1, 1998.
    Caprock Pipeline states that the purpose of the filing is to 
correct inadvertent errors made in the July 1, 1998, filing in this 
proceeding.
    Caprock Pipeline states that copies of the filing are being mailed 
to its transportation customers and interested state regulatory 
agencies.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19766 Filed 7-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 151 (Thursday, August 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 42017]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20994]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-117-002]


KN Interstate Gas Transmission Co.; Notice of Proposed changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

July 31, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 28, 1998, KN Interstate Gas Transmission 
Co. (KNI) moved into effect certain rates and revised tariff sheets to 
its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume Nos. 1-A and 1-B and Second 
Revised Volume Nos. 1-C and 1-D, the following tariff sheets to become 
effective August 1, 1998.

Third Revised Volume No. 1-A
Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 4-A
Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 4-B
Substitute Fifth Revised Sheet No. 4-D
Third Revised Volume No. 1-B
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 24
First Revised Volume No. 1-C
Substitute Tenth Revised Sheet No. 4
First Revised Volume No. 1-D
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 21

    KNI states that such revised tariff sheets reflect changes in rates 
and tariff provisions pursuant to Section 4(e) of the Natural Gas Act 
(NGA), 15 U.S.C. Section 717c(e), and 18 CFR Section 154.206(b) of the 
Commission's regulations thereunder, and the Commission's order issued 
on February 26, 1998 in this proceeding, 82 FERC para. 61,186 (1998).
    KNI has served copies of this filing upon all jurisdictional 
customers, interested State Commissions, and other interested parties.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings.
    Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are 
available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20994 Filed 8-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
OFFICE OFIHE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFTEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Honorable Winston Bmamett 

a0my iittortt6y 

Makeian County 

Dlokazus, %xas 
Eon. alnston Bruinmcstt, page 2 

of li uor, is stit out in the ssoond paragraph of 

Art. 8 66-31, and Is d,aflned a8 any beverage oontainlng mom than one-half of one peroent of aloohol by rolumo whioh is oapable of use GOT beverace purpose8, eithas alone or when diluted. 

*Of oourse thla *Wine Tonlo* ia supposed to 

be #old as a med~olac and/or something to *t&mutit6 an& inorease the appetite and oontaining 

rltanln Bl whatever that. is, the, iact that it 

aonta~lns vfta%in Bl is stamped on the lribel bttaahed to each bottle. Howover, I hare Sound 

nothlng under the Uquor atatutes authorlz~ 

the, sala .bf'in alomhb~ia ,btiveragse for beverage 

,puxposes in a dry oouiity. Nor have I found anything under ~aoy Drug +ot, a&horizing snah ~(11~. 

immulas j *iah w6r6 mawand lawful. ptm 

not aa~ beYe%agea.* The guilty intent of the se r=** sr, under eata

the rspe&.ed Act, wae question of faot to be decided against 

him beforr\ a oonriotionnould stand. Lf the prod showed 

theit..#e liquid w08 sola~fo~ m&iaSnql purposes =a not eia 

a bevera& there eould~ be no oonvlotlon. HolXman v. State, 

299 & W.~ 249. 
-T.- 

- - 

- r 

Honorable Winston Brammtt, page 3 

Under tiha Texas Liquor Control Aat howovar thma 

la ao saoh axoeption, If one in a "dry amaR sallrr *any 

bereraga oontalnlng mre than one-hali of one 

aloohol by o&me whioh la oapabls of use for % 

eroant of 

average purpoaaa aithar alone or whan dilutad,m he haas oomcaitted an 

0% &6oler@d by the law to be unlawful. 

.Ths question ubather a givenalc~ohollo liquid 

is ca 

p" 

bls of belag wed aa a beverage manlfcatly 1s the 

quest on-for dstermlnatioa and is a question of foot. Th$re 

$8 no.marked dividing line. botwoenthoae liquids whfahare 

ganer&llyknowto bs for beverage purposes anathosewhloh 

are atrlctly medloinal or imn-beverage. It should be notload
************************* 

 * MONOGRAPH NO: 3A11 

 ************************* 

ITEM: Raspberry Swirls with Icing, Shelf Stable (RSL) SECONDARY 

 Style II 

NSN: 8920 01 510 7767 ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR-S-007 Poly Tray 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM: 

APPEARANCE: spiral baked golden brown pastry bun, topped with white icing 

glaze, wound around light maroon colored seeded red raspberry filling; off white 

to light yellow crumb (raspberry filling may have bled a little into the layers of 

dough) 

ODOR: moderate raspberry, baked pastry odor 

FLAVOR: sweet, moderate raspberry, slightly sweet pastry flavor dough 

TEXTURE: moist, tender, chewy pastry, slightly dry outer surface 

 ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 18-36 months 

 100 DEGREES F: 3-6 months 

 

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES: 

Appearance: darkening of roll; darkening of icing; browning of raspberry filling, 

loss of raspberry filling into matrix; compression streaks 

Odor: loss of raspberry odor, stale, rancid/oxidized, musty 

Flavor: loss of raspberry flavor, stale, rancid/oxidized, heat storage flavor, 

pronounced bitterness 

Texture: staling, dry, crumbly 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None
No. 11-7576.

#### Wayne Carr, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1135, 132 S. Ct. 1061,

181 L. Ed. 2d 779,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 46.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
************************* 

 * MONOGRAPH NO: 1A1H 

 ************************* 

ITEM: Buffalo Chicken in Spicy Sauce (BUF) PRIMARY 

NSN: 8940 01 517 9869 ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR-B-039 Poly Tray 

 8940 01 517 5749 PCR-B-040 Tray Can 

 (UGR) 

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 250 Kcals 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM: 

APPEARANCE: bright red/orange sauce with small bits of breading dispersed 

throughout, slightly oily sauce (oil from breading on chicken); breaded chicken 

tenders with golden orange breading (from absorption of sauce); tan interior to 

tenders, with slight pinkish tinge to chicken meat (from bled in sauce) 

 

ODOR: strong vinegar and capsaicin, hot red spice 

 

FLAVOR: very hot spicy, vinegar, cayenne pepper; cooked chicken 

 

TEXTURE: moderately thick fluid sauce; slightly to moderately moist tender 

chicken with moist breading 

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36m 

 100 DEGREES F: 6m 

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES/DEFECTS: 

APPEARANCE: separation of oil in sauce (oil from breading on chicken) 

 

ODOR: loss of odor or more pungent vinegar and capsaicin 

 

FLAVOR: loss or strengthening of heat intensity 

 

TEXTURE: dry chicken, mushy breading, oily sauce
|                                           |
|-------------------------------------------|
|                                           |  |  |
| Subsidiaries of CURO Group Holdings Corp. |
| as of December 31, 2017                   |
|                                      |   |   |
| Entity Name                               |   | Jurisdiction of Incorporation/Organization |
| CURO Financial Technology Corp.           |   | Delaware |
| CURO Intermediate Holdings Corp.          |   | Delaware |
| A Speedy Cash Car Title Loans, LLC        |   | Nevada |
| Advance Group, Inc.                       |   | Nevada |
| Attain Finance, LLC                       |   | Nevada |
| Attain Finance Canada, Inc.               |   | Canada |
| Avio Credit, Inc.                         |   | Delaware |
| Cash Colorado, LLC.                       |   | Nevada |
| Cash Money Cheque Cashing, Inc.           |   | Canada |
| Concord Finance, Inc.                     |   | Nevada |
| CFTC Finance, Inc.                        |   | Delaware |
| Evergreen Financial Investments, Inc.     |   | Nevada |
| FMMR Investments, Inc.                    |   | Nevada |
| Galt Ventures, LLC                        |   | Kansas |
| LendDirect Corp.                          |   | Canada |
| Principal Investments, Inc.               |   | Nevada |
| SCIL Texas, LLC                           |   | Nevada |
| SC Aurum, LLC                             |   | Nevada |
| SCIL, Inc.                                |   | Nevada |
| Speedy Cash                               |   | Nevada |
| Speedy Cash Illinois, Inc.                |   | Nevada |
| SRC Transatlantic Limited                 |   | United Kingdom |
| SC Texas MB, Inc.                         |   | Nevada |
| The Money Store, L.P.                     |   | Texas |
| CURO Management LLC                       |   | Nevada |
| Todd Car Title, Inc.                      |   | Nevada |
| Todd Financial, Inc.                      |   | Nevada |
| CURO Transatlantic Limited                |   | United Kingdom |
| Ennoble Finance, Inc.                     |   | Delaware |
| CURO Receivables Holdings I, LLC          |   | Delaware |
| CURO Receivables Finance I, LLC           |   | Delaware |
No. 11-7027.

#### Patricia Martinez, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the District of New Mexico (two judgments).

565 U.S. 1121, 132 S. Ct. 1076,

181 L. Ed. 2d 753,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 233,

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
VEHICLE TECHNICAL INSPECTION

ITEM

SUBTOTALS

DATE OF DELIVERY

MANUFACTURER MODEL SERIAL NO. AGE MILEAGE/HOURS CUM.

DIAGNOSIS

SATISFACTORYREPAIRREPLACE

MANHOURS

LABOR

COST

OF

PARTS

ITEM DIAGNOSIS

SATISFACTORYREPAIRREPLACE

MANHOURS

LABOR

COST

OF

PARTS

FRAME AND

BRACKETS

BUMPERS

TOWING

CONNECTIONS

FIFTH WHEEL

BRUSH GUARD

AND GRILLE

HOOD AND

FENDERS

BODY

CANVAS

PAINT

CAB AND DOORS

WINDSHIELD

AND WINDOWS

WIPER MOTOR

AND BLADES

HORN AND

MIRROR

HEATER

SPEEDOMETER &

TACHOMETER

AMMETER OR

VOLTMETER

GAUGES AND

SENDING UNITS

SEATS AND

UPHOLSTERY

FLOOR

INTERIOR TRIM

ENGINE OR

DRIVE MOTOR

CYL HEAD AND

BLOCK

VALVES AND

PISTON RINGS

INT AND EXH

MANIFOLDS

OIL PAN

OIL PUMP AND

LINES

OIL FILTER AND

ELEMENT

RADIATOR

THERMOSTAT

AND HOSES

WATER PUMP

AND FAN

DRIVE BELTS

AIR

COMPRESSOR

AIR GOVERNOR

AIR TANKS

AND LINES

GENERATOR OR

ALTERNATOR

REGULATOR

RECTIFIER

BATTERY

STARTER AND

SOLENOID

DISTRIBUTOR

AND POINTS

IGNITION COIL

SPARK PLUGS

AND CABLES

HEADLIGHTS

TAILLIGHTS

CLEARANCE AND

MARKER LIGHTS

SWITCHES

WIRING AND

CONNECTORS

CARBURETOR

AND GOVERNOR

AIR CLEANER

FUEL PUMP AND

FILTER

FUEL TANK AND

LINES

MUFFLER

EXHAUST AND

TAILPIPES

CLUTCH

SUBTOTALS

DLA FORM 1730, NOV 2004 (EG) EDITION OF MAY 83 MAY BE USED UNTIL EXHAUSTED
CYLINDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

ITEM DIAGNOSIS

SATISFACTORYREPAIRREPLACE

MANHOURS

LABOR

COST

OF

PARTS

ITEM DIAGNOSIS

SATISFACTORYREPAIRREPLACE

MANHOURS

LABOR

COST

OF

PARTS

TRANSMISSION

TRANSFER

POWER TAKEOFF

DRIVE SHAFTS

AND U-JOINTS

DIFFERENTIAL

FRONT AXLE

INTERMEDIATE

AXLE

REAR AXLE

WINCH AND

CABLE

HOIST OR CRANE

SVC BRAKE

SYSTEM

MASTER

CYLINDER

AIR-HYDRAULIC

CYLINER

WHEEL

CYLINDERS

HAND BRAKE

SYSTEM

STEERING GEAR

AND CONTROLS

SPRINGS AND

SHACKLES

SHOCK

ABSORBERS

WHEELS

TIRES AND

TUBES

DATE OF INSPECTION INSTALLATION SIGNATURE OF INSPECTOR 

REMARKS 

SUBTOTALS

ORIGINAL ACQUISITION COST $

SUBTOTALS

RESULTS OF COMPRESSION TEST

DRY

WET

TOTAL REPAIR COSTS COSTS DUE TO ACCIDENT

TOTAL MAN-HOURS

LABOR

LABOR RATE PER

MAN-HOUR

TOTAL COST OF LABOR

TOTAL COST OF PARTS

TOTAL COST OF

REPAIRS

ONE-TIME REPAIR

EXPENDITURE LIMIT

TOTAL COST OF

PREVIOUS REPAIRS

CUMULATIVE REPAIR

EXPENDITURE LIMIT

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

COSTS OF LABOR AND

OVERHEAD

COST OF PARTS

TOTAL COST

$

$

$

OTHER COSTS (List)

$

ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT COST $

DLA FORM 1730, NOV 2004 (EG)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JULY 1, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 1, 2000
(UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFITED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE FORM 10-K FOR YEAR ENDED JAN 1, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,785
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,421
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,643
<INVENTORY>                                     38,070
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,801
<PP&E>                                          40,397
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,947
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 115,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,648
<BONDS>                                         67,751
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           33,819
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                    (54,824)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   115,823
<SALES>                                         88,235
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                88,235
<CGS>                                           49,111
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (145)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                22,219
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (5,448)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,313)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        43
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,356)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  4,429
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,073
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.44


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 37 (Thursday, February 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 8813]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4026]



[[Page 8813]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on Diesel 
Aftertreatment Accelerated Aging Cycles--Heavy-Duty

    Notice is hereby given that, on February 2, 2009, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Southwest Research 
Institute Cooperative Research Group on Diesel Aftertreatment 
Accelerated Aging Cycles--Heavy-Duty (``DAAAC-HD'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the 
venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties 
to the venture are: Doosan Infracore, Incheon, Republic of Korea; Isuzu 
Motors Limited, Kanagawa-ken, Japan; Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, 
OH; MTtJ, Friedrichshafen, Germany; Navistar Inc., Melrose Park, IL; 
Scania, Sodertalje, Sweden; and Umicore, Catoosa, OK. The purpose and 
the nature of DAAAC-HD is to develop a methodology and procedures for 
accelerating heavy duty diesel aftertreatment systems aging for heavy-
duty diesel engine applications, such as emission components and 
systems. The procedures to be developed will aim to dramatically 
shorten durability testing times. In addition, these procedures can be 
used by the industry to determine the most effective emissions systems 
for their heavy-duty diesel engine applications. It is anticipated that 
the central component of the accelerated aging procedure will be a 
cycle that would expose diesel aftertreatment systems to exhaust at an 
elevated temperature. In addition, such exhaust will have a chemical 
composition that would accelerate the aftertreatment system aging.
    Membership in this research group remains open, and DAAAC-HD 
intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes 
in membership or planned activities.

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. E9-4026 Filed 2-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUDMILA BOIKO, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 18-16777 

D.C. No. 5:18-cv-03324-LHK 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Lucy H. Koh, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 3, 2020**

Before: MURGUIA, CHRISTEN, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Ludmila Boiko appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing her

action alleging federal claims arising from the mistreatment of her adult daughter. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of 

discretion a dismissal for failure to prosecute. Ash v. Cvetkov, 739 F.2d 493, 495

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 6 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-16777 

(9th Cir. 1984). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Boiko’s action

because Boiko failed to file an amended complaint even after receiving an 

extension of time. See Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642-43 (9th Cir. 

2002) (discussing the five factors to consider in determining whether to dismiss 

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)); see also Dreith v. Nu Image, Inc., 648 F.3d 779, 788 

(9th Cir. 2011) (this court reviews the record independently if the district court 

does not make explicit findings regarding each of the factors). 

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009). 

AFFIRMED.
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $17.45 CWT 0.965 $16.8393

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.1790 LB 3.5 $7.6265

Class I Price $24.4658

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $17.22 CWT 0.965 $16.6173

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.0094 LB 3.5 $7.0329

Class I Price $23.6502

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.8156

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0701

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0351

Price change per quart $0.0175

Price change per pint $0.0088

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0063

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0053

Price change per half pint $0.0044

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.07

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.04

Price adjustment per quart $0.02

Price adjustment per pint $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: May 4, 2014
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4700 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2006 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT 

To provide for the conditional conveyance of any interest 

retained by the United States in St. Joseph Memorial 

Hall in St. Joseph, Michigan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

HR 4700 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF RETAINED INTEREST IN ST. 

2 JOSEPH MEMORIAL HALL. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the terms and condi4 tions of subsection (c), the Administrator of General Serv5 ices shall convey to the city of St. Joseph, Michigan, by 

6 quitclaim deed, any interest retained by the United States 

7 in St. Joseph Memorial Hall. 

8 (b) ST. JOSEPH MEMORIAL HALL.—In this section, 

9 the term ‘‘St. Joseph Memorial Hall’’ means the property 

10 subject to a conveyance from the Secretary of Commerce 

11 to the city of St. Joseph, Michigan, by Quitclaim Deed 

12 dated May 9, 1936, recorded in Liber 310, at page 404, 

13 in the Register of Deeds for Berrien County, Michigan. 

14 (c) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The conveyance 

15 under subsection (a) is subject to the following terms and 

16 conditions: 

17 (1) CONSIDERATION.—As consideration for the 

18 conveyance under subsection (a), the City of St. Jo19 seph, Michigan, shall pay $10,000.00 to the United 

20 States. 

21 (2) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.— 

22 The Administrator of General Services may require 

23 such additional terms and conditions to the convey24 ance under subsection (a) as the Administrator conVerDate Aug 31 2005 06:47 May 06, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4700.RFS H4700

ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

HR 4700 RFS 

1 siders appropriate to protect the interest of the 

2 United States. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 3, 2006. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
No. 10-10949.

#### C. F., Petitioner v. Superior Court of California, Riverside County, et al.

565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1078,

181 L. Ed. 2d 795,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 551.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 858, 132 S. Ct. 193, 181 L. Ed. 2d 101, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6196.