alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-Q of  Mission  West
Properties,  Inc. (the  "Company") for the quarterly  period ended September 30,
2005 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  each of Carl E. Berg, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer  of the  Company,  and Wayne N. Pham,  Vice  President  of  Finance  and
Controller of the Company,  hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as
adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to the best of
his knowledge, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/ Carl E. Berg
--------------------------------------
Carl E. Berg
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
November 9, 2005

/s/ Wayne N. Pham
--------------------------------------
Wayne N. Pham
Vice President of Finance and Controller
November 9, 2005

This  certification   accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  or  otherwise  required,  be  deemed  filed by the
Company  for  purposes  of ss. 18 of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
amended.
Unassociated Document


EXHIBIT 10.19







Third Amendment to Employment Agreement


 


This Third Amendment (“Third Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") dated February 27, 2007 between Payment Data Systems, Inc. ("PDS") and Michael R. Long (“Executive") is entered into this 14th day of January, 2011 and is made part of the Agreement which is hereby amended as follows:







1. Definitions. All capitalized terms used herein and not expressly defined herein shall have the respective meanings given to such terms in the Agreement.







2. Entire Agreement. Except as expressly modified by this Third Amendment, the Agreement shall be and remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms and shall constitute the legal, valid, binding and enforceable obligations of PDS and Executive.







3. Successors and Assigns. This Third Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and permitted assigns of the parties hereto.







4. Section References. Section titles and references used in this Third Amendment shall be without substantive meaning or content of any kind whatsoever and are not a part of the agreements among the parties hereto evidenced hereby.







5. Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy, receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged:







The Base Salary as set forth in Schedule 4(a)(i) of Schedule 1 to the Agreement is hereby amended to be $24,000 per annum in year 2011.







This Third Amendment amends the Agreement as set forth herein. All previously existing obligations under the Agreement are hereby reaffirmed in all respects.







In witness thereof, the parties hereto have caused this Third Amendment to the Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above written.


 


 




	Payment Data Systems, Inc.	 	 	Executive	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
/s/ Louis A. Hoch

	 	 	
/s/ Michael R. Long

	 
	
Name: Louis A. Hoch

	 	 	
Name: Michael R. Long

	 
	
Title: President & COO

	 	 	
Title
Tom Spera 

is being inducted into the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Hall of Fame this fifth day of 

November for his outstanding mission support from 1968 through 2010. Mr. Spera retired as the 

site director, DLA Information Operations at Philadelphia, but served in many leadership capacities 

at the Defense Supply Center Philadelphia, later DLA Troop Support, and at DLA Information 

Operations at Philadelphia. During his 42 and a half years of service, his career was marked by 

creating and managing change while demonstrating unrelenting commitment to protecting the 

integrity of the agency’s information technology systems. Mr. Spera was the visionary leader in the 

transition from the mainframe and batch environment to an environment of networking, 

desktop/laptop workstations and remote access, supporting a workforce in the age of telework. 

Mr. Spera applied his broad technical skills to manage the Y2K initiative and fine-tuned planning 

capabilities related to this program. Consequently, DSCP made a seamless transition into the new 

millennium, with no mission degradation. Base Realignment and Closure decisions required Mr. 

Spera to effect the relocation of 3,500 users, combine two organizations, and support the 

reconstruction of the IT infrastructure for five buildings with more than 500,000 sq. ft. of space, 

consolidate two computer rooms with volumes of data, hundreds of servers and a complex 

telecommunication network. The end result was a seamless transition. Mr. Spera dedicated his 

entire professional career to the warfighter and distinguished himself in doing so. He transitioned 

through many years of innovation in the IT environment, while he adapted and changed as needed 

to be an exceptional manager throughout his years of devoted service to DLA. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/tspera.htm 1/20/2016
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

May 21, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00111

- CV

Lisa FLORES

, Appellant

v.

Mario DE LA OSSA and Navy Federal Credit Union,

Appellees

From the 150th Judicial Distri ct Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- CI

- 24502 Honorable David A. Canales , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record was due to be filed with this court on May 18 , 202 1

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.1. After the due date , the Bexar County District Clerk notified this court that Appellant has

not paid the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and Appellant is not entitled to a free clerk’s
record.

We ORDER Appellant to provide written proof to this court within TEN DAYS of the date of this order that (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee, or (2) Appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. See id. R.
20.1.

If Appellant fails to respond as ordered, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. R. 37.3(b).

________________________________ _ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of May, 2021

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court
No. 11-7251.

#### Dawn Kelley, Petitioner v. Joseph J. Bruzzese, et al.

565 U.S. 1161, 132 S. Ct. 1100,

181 L. Ed. 2d 986,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 781,

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
#### Holger Miller, *Appellant v.*Mae Miller, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed January 21, 1926.

*Whitaker Bros.,*for Appellant;

*B. E. L. Chancey,*for Appellee.

Buford, J.

— This cause is before the court on appeal from the Judge of the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County, adjudging the appellant to be in contempt, of court.

The order from which appeal is taken is as follows, to-wit: “This cause coming on this day to be heard upon the petition of the complainant for a ruling nisi, and the parties being properly before the Court, and the Court having jurisdiction of the subject matter, it is thereupon:

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Holger Miller, the respondent in the above styled cause, be, and he is hereby adjudged in contempt of this Court for his *83failure to pay the sum of $205.00, the amount shown to be delinquent at the date of the filing of the complainant’s petition, to-wit: August 7th, 1924, for the support of Mary Augusta Miller, the minor child of the parties hereto, as required of him by the final decree hereinbefore entered, and until the payment of such sum it is further ordered that the respondent, Holger Miller, remain in contempt of this Court and be confined in'the County Jail of Hillsborough County, Florida, until the same is paid or until further order of the Court. ’ ’ <

The record shows that the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County had jurisdiction of the cause in which the order complained of was made and also had, at the time, jurisdiction of the parties.

The same laws and rules of practice and procedure will apply to this case which apply to contempts for violating an order of injunction.

In such cases appeal does not lie from a commitment or fine for violating, or for refusal to comply with, an order of the Court made in due course and within the jurisdiction of the Court, McCall vs. Lee, 66 Florida 14, 62 So. 902 and ¿uthorities there cited.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed at the cost of the Appellant.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell, J., concur.

Brown, C. J., and Ellis and Strum, J. J., concur in the Opinion.
No. 11-6925.

#### Joyce R. Phillips, Petitioner v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security.

565 U.S. 1096, 132 S. Ct. 853,

181 L. Ed. 2d 556,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8914.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 528.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 151 (Thursday, August 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42015-42016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20982]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-694-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

July 31, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 24, 1998, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia), 12801 Fair Lakes Parkway, Fairfax, Virginia 
22030-0146, filed in Docket No. CP98-694-000 a request pursuant to 
Sections 157.205, and 157.212, of the Commission's Regulations under 
the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 157.212) for authorization to 
modify an existing point of delivery to Washington Gas Light Company 
(WGL) by constructing certain facilities in Prince William County, 
Virginia, under Columbia's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. 
CP83-76-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more 
fully set forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and 
open to public inspection.
    Columbia requests authorization to modify its Robert Trent Jones 
point of delivery and provide service under existing rate schedules and 
within certificated entitlements. Columbia estimates that the proposed 
volumes will be approximately 20,600 Dth/day. The modification has been 
requested by WGL to provide additional firm transportation service for 
residential and commercial customers. WGL has not requested an increase 
in its total firm entitlements. Therefore, there is no impact on 
Columbia's existing peak day obligations to its other customers.

[[Page 42016]]

    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20982 Filed 8-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 11-7929.

#### Hassan Alwali, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1183, 132 S. Ct. 1155,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1027,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 949.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 434 Fed. Appx. 886.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT ALEX LANGE, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. TIM NIC K ER SON; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-56593 D.C . No. 3:12-c v-01294-GPC W M C M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Southe rn Distric t of C a lifornia Gonz a lo P. C urie l, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

M ay 13, 2015 ** B e fore : LEAVY, C ALLAHAN, a nd M . SM ITH, C i rc uit Judge s. Ale x La n g e a ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt dismissing his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging sta te and fe de ra l c la i m s a

rising out of his a

rre st. W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo a dism i ssa l on the b a sis of re s judic ata . Mpoy o v . Litton Ele c t ro-Optic al Sy

s. , 430 F.3d 985, 987 

# F IL ED MAY19 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).(9th C ir. 2005). W e a ffirm .

The distric t c ourt prope rly dism isse d La

n ge ’ s a c tion a s ba

rre d by the doc trine of re s judic ata

be c a use La nge c ould ha

ve ra ise d his § 1983 c la i m s in his prior C a lifornia

sta te c o urt a c tion, whic h involve d the sa m e prim ary

rights, the sam e pa rtie s a nd the ir privie s, a

nd re sulte d in a

fina l judgm e nt on them e rits. Se e Migra v . W

arre n C ity Sc h . Dist. Bd. of Educ
. , 465 U.S. 75, 81 (1984) (in § 1983 a c tions, a fe de ra l c ourt m

ust a pply the re s judic ata

la w of the sta

t e in whic h the judgm e nt wa s e nte re d); F e d’n of Hillside & C

any on Ass’ns v . C

ity of Los Ange le

s , 24 C a l. R ptr. 3d 543, 557-58 (C t. App. 2004) (C a l ifornia ’ s doc t rine of “ [r] e s judic ata ba rs the litiga

tion not only

of issue s tha

t we re a c tua lly

litiga te d but a lso issue s tha t c ould ha ve be e n litiga

te d” whe n , am ong othe r things, both ac tions involvethe sa

m e “ prim ary

right” ); se e also Dy

son v . C al. State Pe rs. Bd. , 262 C a l. R ptr. 112, 118-20 (C t. App. 1989) (discu ssing privity re quire m e nt a

nd e xpla ining that “ a ge nts of thesa

m e gove rnm e nt a

re in privity

with e a c h othe r, sinc e the y re pre se nt not the ir own rights but the right of the gove rnm e nt” (c i tation a n d inte rna l quota

tion m arks om itte d)). W e re je c t La n ge ’ s c onte ntions tha

t the dism issa l of his a c tion wa s pre m ature and viola te d his c onstitutiona

l rights. AFFIRM E D.
1 3 - 5 6 5 9 3 2
# AMERICAN AIRLINES

April 23, 2010

Dorothy Beard Docket Branch Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: 2010 U.S.-Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding, DOT-OST-2010-0018

Dear Ms. Beard:

American Airlines, Inc. hereby submits a letter from the Governor of New York in support of its application for U.S.- Tokyo (Haneda) authority. American is seeking 14 weekly frequencies to operate daily nonstop service to Haneda from New York (JFK) and Los Angeles.

Respectfully submitted,

Carl B. Nelson, Jr. Associate General Counsel American Airlines, Inc.
1101 17 th 

### Street, N.W., Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 496-5647 carl.nelson@aa.com

cc: Service list**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE**

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document by email on the following persons:

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com jhill@dlalaw.com
scott.mcclain@delta.com bill@mietuslaw.com sametta.c.barnett@delta.com mgoldman@sgbdc.com kquinn@pillsburywinthrop.com rsilverberg@sgbdc.com bkeiner@crowell.com dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com
mrosia@crowell.com mcmillin@woa.com bruce.rabinovitz@wilmerhale.com eskraft@jamhoff.com jeffrey.manley@united.com dpdean@jamhoff.com bob.kneisley@wnco.com dkirstein@yklaw.com robert.land@jetblue.com jyoung@yklaw.com msinick@ssd.com donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov cdonley@ssd.com dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil gbleopard@fedex.com jim.ballough@faa.gov dvaughan@kelleydrye.com byerlyjr@state.gov kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com recohn@hhlaw.com jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com cjsimpson@zsrlaw.com lhalloway@crowell.com pmurphy@lopmurphy.com efaberman@wileyrein.com lachter@starpower.net
mroller@rollerbauer.com anita.mosner@hklaw.com howard.kass@usairways.com rpommer@atlasair.com benjamin.slocum@usairways.com gmurphy@crowell.com sophy.chen@hklaw.com russell.bailey@alpa.org
david.heffernan@wilmerhale.com

_______________________________ CARL B. NELSON, JR.

April 23, 2010
# C_2016257EN.01000701.xml

| 15.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/7

---

Special Report No 17/2016

‘The EU Institutions can do more to facilitate access to their public procurement’

(2016/C 257/04)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 17/2016 ‘The EU Institutions can do more to facilitate access to their public procurement’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu or on EU Bookshop: https://bookshop.europa.eu

---
APP A

 DPSCH 4155.2

179

***************************

* MONOGRAPH NO.: M9F

***************************

ITEM: Salt, Table

NSN: 8950-00-641-8980 ITEM SPECIFICATION: Fed Spec SS-S-31

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE: None. (ANCILLARY)

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: White, free-flowing, finely granulated.

ODOR: Typical of commercial product.

FLAVOR: Salty.

TEXTURE: Free-flowing, without caking or lumps (see Special Notes).

DEFECTS LIKELY TO OCCUR:

APPEARANCE: Not white or free-flowing.

ODOR: Any objectionable or non-typical odor (e.g., musty).

FLAVOR: Any objectionable or non-typical flavor (e.g., musty).

TEXTURE: Caked or not free-flowing (see Special Notes).

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: If product is caked or lumped in dry state,

examine the package closely for cuts, tears, holes or open seals. Inserting a pocket flashlight inside the

package while in a dark room often aids in identifying package integrity

defects. Also shake package vigorously ten times and observe for minute quantities of product that may

sift out of package especially at the juncture of the seams and the folded edge of the

package. The defect is appropriately called a sifter.

SPECIAL NOTES: Lumps that break apart under light pressure, (e.g., pressed between the fingers

gently) are of no concern. Trace amounts of dark specks are permissible IAW the item specification

and should not be misconstrued as foreign material. If deemed necessary, coordinate with supporting

laboratory for evaluation.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LEILA SURPRISE, HERBY SURPRISE and DENISE SURPRISE,

Appellants,

v.

CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORP.,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-506

[May 14, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Sandra Perlman, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE14-015184.

Melissa A. Giasi of Giasi Law, P.A., Tampa, for appellants.

Jessica C. Conner of Dean, Ringer, Morgan & Lawton, P.A., Orlando, 

for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Filed 10/9/13 Terrill v. Patzer CA4/3 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

DIVISION THREE 

MICHELLE ELIZABETH TERRILL, 

 Plaintiff and Respondent, 

 v. 

JULIE PATZER, 

 Defendant and Appellant. 

 G048256 

 (Super. Ct. No. 30-2013-00623295) 

 O P I N I O N 

 Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Michael 

Brenner, Judge. (Retired judge of the Orange Super. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice 

pursuant to art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) Affirmed. 

 Julie Patzer, in pro. per., and for Defendant and Appellant. 

 No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. 

* * * 
2

 Defendant Julie Patzer appeals from a civil harassment restraining order 

issued upon the petition of Michelle Elizabeth Terrill. Patzer’s brief is devoid of any 

record references, legal analysis, or citations to authority. The most we can derive from 

the brief is that she attacks the credibility of Terrill and Jennifer Wilson, a witness who 

testified in support of Terrill’s petition. But it is for the trial court to determine 

credibility. Our task is merely to determine whether the judgment is supported by 

substantial evidence. 

 The transcript of the hearing discloses that, for over a year, Patzer resided 

in a “back house” on Terrill’s property. Their difficulties started when Patzer quit her 

job; apparently because she caused some disturbance at work. The police called Terrill 

telling her that Patzer was acting erratically. After Terrill arrived at home, she had a 

conversation with Patzer which resulted in a confrontation where Patzer grabbed Terrill’s 

arm and called her “unpleasant, four-letter names.” Thereafter there were further 

incidents, including Patzer creating a bizarre display in Terrill’s back yard. 

 We are satisfied there was substantial evidence supporting the issuance of 

the restraining order. “Under the substantial evidence standard of review, ‘we must 

consider all of the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, giving it 

the benefit of every reasonable inference, and resolving conflicts in support of the 

[findings]. [Citations.] [¶] It is not our task to weigh conflicts and disputes in the 

evidence; that is the province of the trier of fact. Our authority begins and ends with a 

determination as to whether, on the entire record, there is any substantial evidence, 

contradicted or uncontradicted, in support of the judgment.’” (ASP Properties Group, 

L.P. v. Fard, Inc. (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 1257, 1266.) 
3

DISPOSITION 

 The order is affirmed. Appellant shall bear her own costs on appeal. 

 

 RYLAARSDAM, ACTING P. J. 

WE CONCUR: 

MOORE, J. 

FYBEL, J.
ITEM: Herb Rice (HAR) MONOGRAPH NO.: KB8

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE: 400 Kilocalories.

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Thick congealed sauce starch with rice, carrots and spices

ODOR: Strong herbal spice, rosemary
FLAVOR: Spicy rosemary with rice
TEXTURE: Firm, dry, grainy, and crumbly

DEFECTS LIKELY TO OCCUR:

APPEARANCE: _ Darkening

ODOR: Excessively strong, spicy odor
FLAVOR: Yeasty, rancid
TEXTURE: Hardening

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES:

SPECIAL NOTES: None