alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-7387.

#### Osbaldo Oswaldo Sara-bia, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1130, 132 S. Ct. 1047,

181 L. Ed. 2d 769,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 152.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 446 Fed. Appx. 48.
(1) Adjusting Price 15.05 CWT

(2) Base Price 18.74 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT (3.69)

(4) Price change per gallon (0.32)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon (0.16)

Price change per quart (0.08) 

Price change per pint (0.04)

Price change per 12-oz pg. (0.03)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) (0.02)

Price change per half pint (0.02)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon (0.32)

Price adjustment per half gallon (0.16)

Price adjustment per quart (0.08)

Price adjustment per pint (0.04)

Price change per 12-oz pg. (0.03)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) (0.02)

Price adjustment per half pint (0.02)

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Marketing Area Federal Milk Order #51

 Effective Date: May 3, 2020
No. 11-6005.

#### Steven L. Greenleaf, Petitioner v. Florida.

565 U.S. 967, 132 S. Ct. 463,

181 L. Ed. 2d 302,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7547.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.

Same case below, 63 So. 3d 763.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First National Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2002 (the Report), I,
Francis I. duPont, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

-s- Francis I. duPont, III

Francis I. duPont, III
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002
**CERTIFICATIONS***
Exhibit 31.1                    
I, Francis I. duPont, III, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First NationalBancshares, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and wehave:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterlyreport is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to thefiling date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data andhave identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknessesin internal controls; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls; and
6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in thisquarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internalcontrols subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, includingany corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.   Date: May 10, 2004 /s/ *Francis I. duPont, III* Title: Principal Executive Officer
No. 11-6803.

#### Abraham P. Holbrook, Petitioner v. Maryland.

565 U.S. 1083, 132 S. Ct. 825,

181 L. Ed. 2d 534,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8763.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.

Same case below, 196 Md. App. 717.
Date: 30 August 2022 ****************************

NSN: 8940-01-467-1894 (STD) *MONOGRAPH: MCW/LRP 02

 ****************************

Item: Beef Stroganoff with Noodles, Cooked, Dehydrated

Document: PCR-B-016, Beef Stroganoff, Cooked, Dehydrated, Packaged in a Stand Up Pouch, 

Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 600 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Dehydrated product: Mixture of off-white to pale yellow fine egg noodles, medium 

brown ground beef pieces, grayish-brown mushroom pieces, off-white onion pieces

covered in a light to medium tan free-flowing sauce powder.

Rehydrated product: Mixture of off-white to pale yellow distinct egg noodle strips that 

readily separate, medium brown distinct ground beef pieces, grayish-brown mushroom 

pieces, translucent white to off-white onion pieces in a semi-translucent, glossy, and

light tan sauce.

Odor:

Dehydrated product: Sour cream and cooked beef.

Rehydrated product: Cooked egg noodle, ground beef, mushroom and onion in a sour 

cream based sauce.

Flavor: Rehydrated product: Cooked egg noodle, ground beef, mushroom and onion in a sour 

cream based sauce.

Texture:

Dehydrated product: No wet or soft spots indicating incomplete dehydration.

Rehydrated product: Fully rehydrated within twelve minutes, slightly soft to slightly 

firm egg noodles, moist and tender ground beef pieces, slightly soft and tender 

vegetable pieces, smooth and moderately thick sauce.

Possible Deteriorative Changes

Appearance: Dehydrated and Rehydrated: Darkening or loss of color of noodles, sauce, meat. 

Odor: Dehydrated: Cardboard, oxidized, rancid, scorched, burnt, sour, fishy.

Rehydrated: Cardboard, oxidized, rancid, scorched, burnt, sour.

Flavor: Dehydrated and Rehydrated: Cardboard, oxidized, rancid, scorched, burnt, loss of 

spice.

Texture:

Dehydrate: Very hard, tacky, crystalline beef, case hardened noodles. 

Rehydrated: Unrehydrated product, chewy, dry beef and mushrooms, mushy noodles, 

excess water. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

N/A

Special Notes

N/A
No. 11-5818.

#### LaVon S. Pressley, Petitioner v. CaroMont Health Incorporated, et al.

565 U.S. 952, 132 S. Ct. 419,

181 L. Ed. 2d 274,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7395,

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 414 Fed. Appx. 566.
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

 

 ************************ 

 MONOGRAPH NO. BF4 

 ************************ 

ITEM: Pears, Bartlett, Halves w/Light or Heavy Syrup; Grade A or B; Canned 

 

NSN: 8915-00-616-0223 ITEM SPECIFICATION: US STD for Grades 

COMPONENT CLASSIFICATION: Secondary 

 

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 94 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM: 

APPEARANCE: Typical pear fruit white. 

ODOR: Sweet pear. 

FLAVOR: Sweet pear. 

TEXTURE: Hard, firm. 

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 70 DEGREES F: 36(24) months 

 80 DEGREES F: 30(20) months 

 90 DEGREES F: 24(16) months 

 100 DEGREES F: 18(12) months 

 NOTE: Numbers in parentheses are data for #10 cans. 

EXPECTED DETERIORATIVE CHANGES: 

APPEARANCE: Darker, pinkish brown to brown. 

ODOR: Low pear, very slightly sour. 

FLAVOR: Low pear, less sweet to very slightly sour, flat, slight metallic. 

TEXTURE: Soft, mushy. 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None. 

SPECIAL NOTES: Product is packed in a #2-1/2 can. Can is designed to yield 6 servings of 

approximately 1/2 cup each (128 grams).
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 146 (Thursday, July 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20324]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-12-29-001]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Tariff 
Filing

July 24, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 17, 1998, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC 
Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, Substitute Fifteenth Revised 
Tariff Sheet No. 50. The proposed effective date of the revised tariff 
sheet is July 1, 1998.
    Transco states that the purpose of the instant filing is to 
supplement Transco's FT-NT Tracker filing of July 2, 1998 in Docket No. 
TM98-12-29-000 (July 2 Filing), which filing inadvertently neglected to 
revise the July 1, 1998 Texas Gas Transmission Corporation (Texas Gas) 
commodity rates. In order to reflect the correct FT-NT commodity rates, 
Transco is submitting Substitute Fifteenth Revised Sheet No. 50 to 
replace the tariff sheet effective July 1, 1998 in the July 2 filing.
    Transco states that copies of the instant filing are being mailed 
to affected customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20324 Filed 7-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# Ferrari Meeting With

EPA May 3, 2012 Ann Arbor, MI

### Background of SVM Regulatory Issue

 Ferrari has historically been considered a “Small Volume Manufacturer” (SVM) by EPA and CARB for tailpipe, evaporative, and OBD standards and by NHTSA for safety standards

 Ferrari’s comments on the MYs 2012-2016 proposal requested continuation of this status

 In January 2010, EPA told Ferrari that it could not address this request in the MYs 2012-2016 rules, but would do so in the MYs 2017-2025 proposal In subsequent meetings with EPA and CARB, Ferrari has identified continuation of SVM status as essential to its on-going operations

### Key Points For SVM Regulatory Provision

 No adverse comments on the “operational independence” concept  VW noted criteria may be too stringent No comments from NGOs  Ferrari has noted issues regarding Ferrari regarding “conventional” emissions from the very early meetings with EPA late 2009 and early 2010  Ferrari’s proposed regulatory revision to 40 CFR § 86.1838(b) would be generally applicable to the SVM “aggregation” provisions See Attachment 1 to Ferrari comments to EPA
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-2 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and
represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of
July 31, 2017, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-2 and Wilmington Trust, National Association (the Agreement) during
the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Sandra M. BroderickName:

Sandra M. BroderickTitle:

EVP Head of OperationsDate:

March 29, 2019By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

TreasurerDate:

March 29, 2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      49,128,000
<SECURITIES>                                27,729,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               40,429,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,062,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,117,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           122,469,000
<PP&E>                                     217,688,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (39,985,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,503,928,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       70,933,000
<BONDS>                                  1,193,134,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                376,862,000
<COMMON>                                         3,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (137,004,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,503,928,000
<SALES>                                    212,069,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           212,069,000
<CGS>                                       31,282,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              158,426,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                82,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          80,620,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (23,441,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    67,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (23,508,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (23,508,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 11-7109.

#### Gil Jones, Petitioner v. Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services.

565 U.S. 1124, 132 S. Ct. 1076,

181 L. Ed. 2d 757,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 156.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 441 Fed. Appx. 149.
No. 11-5766.

#### Robert William Dutcher, Petitioner v. Arizona.

565 U.S. 921, 132 S. Ct. 346,

181 L. Ed. 2d 217,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6922.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division Two, denied.
DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PILOT PROJECT June 9, 

2015

Fabric Nomenclature WEBBING – 2 INCH, TEXTILE, WOVEN NYLON MIL-W-17337

Shade Number COYOTE 498 Piece/Roll Number 3892

Equipment type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included -

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp 

OFF

ID Rectangular L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* DEcmc*

Standard 3892 -------------------- 42.80 5.19 18.12

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY
Q411 Exhibit 10.47






Exhibit 10.47


STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010




Cash Compensation


Each non-employee director receives an annual fee consisting of (1) $25,000 for serving on the board, (2) $1,000 for serving on each committee (including chairmen of the committee), (3) $7,000 for serving as chairman of the audit committee, and (4) $5,000 for serving as chairman of the corporate personnel committee.  In addition, each director and committee member receives $1,500 for attendance at each board and committee meeting, as well as reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending such meetings, or $1,000 for participation in each board and committee meeting by telephone conference.


Equity-Based Compensation


Each non-employee director also receives equity-based compensation under the company's stock incentive plans, which were approved by the company's stockholders.  Under the company's current program, on September 1st of each year, each non-employee director is granted options to acquire 2,500 shares of our common stock.  The options are granted at fair market value on the grant date, vest ratably over the first four anniversaries of the grant date and expire on the tenth anniversary of the grant date.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 150 (Wednesday, August 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 41884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20861]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice of reporting requirements submitted for OMB review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), agencies are required to submit proposed reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and approval, and to 
publish a notice in the Federal Register notifying the public that the 
agency has made such a submission.

DATES: Submit comments on or before September 4, 1998. If you intend to 
comment but cannot prepare comments promptly, please advise the OMB 
Reviewer and the Agency Clearance Officer before the deadline.

COPIES: Request for clearance (OMB 83-1), supporting statement, and 
other documents submitted to OMB for review may be obtained from the 
Agency Clearance Officer.

ADDRESSES: Address all comments concerning this notice to: Agency 
Clearance Officer, Jacqueline White, Small Business Administration, 409 
3rd Street, S.W., 5th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20416; and OMB Reviewer, 
Victoria Wassmer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office 
of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, 
D.C. 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline White, Agency Clearance 
Officer, (202) 205-6629.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Disclosure Statement.
    Form No.: 856.
    Frequency: Biannually.
    Description of Respondents: Small Business Investment Companies.
    Annual Responses: 200.
    Annual Burden: 200.

    Title: Application for Pool of Guaranteed Interest Certificates.
    Form No: 1454.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    Description of Respondents: SBA Loan Pool Assemblers.
    Annual Responses: 450.
    Annual Burden: 1350.

    Dated: July 29, 1998.
Jacqueline White,
Chief, Administrative Information Branch.
[FR Doc. 98-20861 Filed 8-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Millburn L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Perry,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		August 16, 2004
No. 11-7034.

#### James Niblock, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, et al.

565 U.S. 1073, 132 S. Ct. 799,

181 L. Ed. 2d 509,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8340,

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 453 Fed. Appx. 393.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of First National Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, F. I.
duPont, III, Chairman & CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ F. I. duPont, III
No. 11-7425.

#### Kelvin Owens, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1131, 132 S. Ct. 1049,

181 L. Ed. 2d 770,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 66.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 436 Fed. Appx. 745.