alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-6140.

#### Tami Carnley, Petitioner v. David Morgan, Sheriff, Escambia County, Florida.

565 U.S. 985, 132 S. Ct. 513,

181 L. Ed. 2d 362,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7858.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 60 So. 3d 1054.
No. 11-375.

#### Kenneth Zahl, Petitioner v. New Jersey Department of Law & Public Safety, et al.

565 U.S. 1060, 132 S. Ct. 769,

181 L. Ed. 2d 486,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8559.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 428 Fed. Appx. 205.
No. 11-6173.

#### Robert R. Heffernan, Petitioner v. Grant Harris, Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, et al.

565 U.S. 968, 132 S. Ct. 465,

181 L. Ed. 2d 303,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7485.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 419 Fed. Appx. 706.
No. 11-6475.

#### Horace McKinney, Petitioner v. Florida.

565 U.S. 989, 132 S. Ct. 527,

181 L. Ed. 2d 369,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7612.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 66 So. 3d 852.
No. 11-5718.

#### Marion Hirsch, Petitioner v. Enoch Pratt Free Library, et al.

565 U.S. 1063, 132 S. Ct. 785,

181 L. Ed. 2d 490,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8552,

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 4227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-2027]



[[Page 4227]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Acceptance of Group Application Under Public Law 95-202 and 
Department of Defense Directive (DoDD) 1000.20 ``Chamorros, Including 
the Chamorro Marine Scouts, Who Assisted the U.S. Marines in the 
Offensive Operations Against the Japanese on the Saipan, Pagan, and 
Maug Islands, of the Northern Mariana Islands, From June 19, 1944, 
Through September 2, 1945

    Under the provisions of section 401, Public Law 95-202 and DoD 
Directive 1000.20, the Department of Defense Civilian/Military Service 
Review Board has accepted an application on behalf of the group know 
as: ``Chamorros, including the Chamorro Marine Scouts, who assisted the 
U.S. Marines in the offensive operations against the Japanese on the 
Saipan, Pagan, and Maug Islands, of the Northern Mariana Islands, from 
June 19, 1944, through September 2, 1945.'' Persons with information or 
documentation pertinent to the determination of whether the service of 
this group should be considered active military service to the Armed 
Forces of the United States are encouraged to submit such information 
or documentation within 60 days to the DoD Civilian/Military Service 
Review Board, 1535 Command Drive, EE-Wing, 3rd Floor, Andrews Air Force 
Base, MD 20762-7002. Copies of documents or other materials submitted 
cannot be returned.
Barbara A. Carmichael,
Alternate Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-2027 Filed 1-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910-01-P
No. D-2605.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Ralph Thomas Mabry, Jr.

565 U.S. 1052, 132 S. Ct. 809,

181 L. Ed. 2d 520,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8427.

November 28, 2011.

Ralph Thomas Mabry, Jr., of Silver Spring, Maryland, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
19 April 2013 *************************

NSN: 8960-01-523-6344 (ONS) *MONOGRAPH NO: M7F

*************************

Item: 

Beverage bases (Powdered), Sweetened with nutritive sweetener, Orange, Fortified with 

ascorbic acid and enhanced with maltodextrin, Small flat pouch (Type II, Flavor 1, 

Formulation d, Design E)

Document: CID A-A-20098, Beverage Bases (Powdered) and PKG&QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 130 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Dehydrated product: Uniformly blended, free flowing, and a homogenous dry mixture 

free of hard lumps. Granulation can vary from fine powder to small agglomerated 

crystals.

Rehydrated product: Bright orange, sediment free, clear to slightly cloudy.

Odor: Rehydrated product: Distinct orange, sweet and sour.

Flavor: Rehydrated product: Distinct orange, sweet and sour.

Texture: Dehydrated product: Free of hard lumps.

Rehydrated product: Fully dissolve within two minutes with constant stirring.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Rehydrated: Coagulated, jelled, surface frothing, or cloudiness, excessive sediment 

significantly affecting aesthetic appearance or flavor.

Odor: Burnt, scorched, moldy/mildew.

Flavor: Oxidized or any other flavor not typical of the type of beverage.

Texture: Lumpy or caked, not free flowing.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Prepare beverage IAW package instructions. Product should dissolve completely within about two 

minutes.

Special Notes
19 April 2013 *************************

NSN: 8960-01-523-6344 (ONS) *MONOGRAPH NO: M7F

*************************

If slight sedimentation and clouding are observed but the odor and flavor are normal, do not score the 

sedimentation as a defect during surveillance inspection; make note of it in the narrative for future use. 

Coagulation/gelation may occur if the original formulation was incorrect or if the product has been 

temperature abused for a long time. Coagulation / gelation results in clumps of granules that do not 

readily dissolve when product is reconstituted. Particles tend to float in suspension (look like gel pockets 

or tapioca granules that are clumped together).
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 23-1487

ARES TRADING S.A., Appellant

v.

DYAX CORP.

(D. Del. No. 1-19-cv-02300)

Present: KRAUSE, PORTER, and CHUNG, Circuit Judges

_________________________________ORDER________________________________

Construing the parties’ submissions of August 26, 2024 as a motion for partial sealing, the motion is GRANTED. The publicly filed version of the Court’s opinion shall be redacted accordingly and such redacted information shall be maintained under seal for a period of seven years after the conclusion of the case.

By the Court,

s/ Cheryl Ann Krause Circuit Judge

Dated: September 3, 2024

kr/cc: All Counsel of Record
20th Biannual CDC/ATSDR 

Tribal Advisory Committee Meeting 

Federal Moderator: José Montero, MD, MHCDS, Director, Center for State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial Support (CSTLTS) 

Tribal Moderator: Robert TwoBears, Legislative Representative, Ho-Chunk Nation of Wisconsin 

OCTOBER - 2020 

15THURSDAY 

1:00 PM Opening Blessing, Welcome, 

Introductions 

1:20 PM TAC Business 

2:50 PM Break 

3:00 PM CDC Budget Update 

3:30 PM Listening Session on COVID-19 Funding 

4:00 PM Break 

4:10 PM Violence Prevention Convening Session 

5:10 PM Break 

5:20 PM Tribal Practices for Wellness in Indian 

Country Discussion 

5:50 PM Day 1 Meeting Summary 

6:00 PM Adjournment of CDC/ATSDR Meeting 

16FRIDAY 

1:00 PM Welcome & Housekeeping 

1:30 PM COVID-19 Vaccination Discussion 

2:30 PM Star Collections Books Review 

3:00 PM CDC Director/ATSDR Administrator 

Updates 

3:40 PM CDC Senior Leadership Roundtable 

Discussion 

4:50 PM Tribal Testimony 

5:50 PM Day 2 Meeting Summary 

6:00 PM Adjournment of CDC/ATSDR Meeting 

Agenda subject to change
#### Shender, Appellant, *v.*Philadelphia.

Argued November 11, 1953.

Before Stern, C. J., Stearne, Jones, Bell and Chidsey, JJ.

*599
      *Edward*Unterberger, for appellant.

*James L. Stern,*Assistant City Solicitor, with Mm *Matthew W. Bulloch, Jr.,*Assistant City Solicitor, and *Abraham L. Freedman,*City Solicitor, for appellee.

January 4, 1954:

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Tbe order of the court below dismissing plaintiff’s complaint is affirmed, at the cost of appellant, on the opinion of Judge Crumlish.
No. 11-514.

#### Leigh Jesse Quinto, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1062, 132 S. Ct. 787,

181 L. Ed. 2d 489,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8636.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 151 (Thursday, August 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 42018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20992]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Nora Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

July 31, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 27, 1998, Nora Transmission Company (Nora) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First, Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets to become effective 
August 1, 1998:

Substitute Second Revised Sheets No. 173

    Nora states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the 
Commission's Letter Order issued on July 20, 1998 in the captioned 
docket. In the July 20 Order, the Commission required Nora to include 
by reference or verbatim the CISB standards 4.3.5 and 4.3.16. Nora has 
incorporated by reference GISB standards 4.3.5 and 4.3.16 in its 
General Terms and Conditions, Section 39 of its FERC Gas Tariff.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20992 Filed 8-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
No. 11-5020.

#### Felix Cruz Martinez, Petitioner v. L. E. Scribner, Warden.

565 U.S. 885, 132 S. Ct. 259,

181 L. Ed. 2d 151,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5514,

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 399 Fed. Appx. 263.
No. 11-6525.

#### Jerry Johnson, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 990, 132 S. Ct. 530,

181 L. Ed. 2d 371,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7667.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 276.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

RICARDO CAZARES-OZUNA, a.k.a.

Richard Martinez,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-10373

D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00085-LKK

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence K. Karlton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 18, 2013** 

Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. 

Ricardo Cazares-Ozuna appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for

being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

FILED

JUN 21 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-10373

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Cazares-Ozuna contends that the district court procedurally erred by

“mechanically” imposing a Guidelines sentence and by failing to provide reasons

as to why he was a danger to the community. We review for plain error, see

United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and find

none. The record shows the district court understood that the Guidelines are

advisory and adequately explained the sentence.

Cazares-Ozuna also contends that the district court abused its discretion by

failing to depart or vary downward on the basis of his cultural assimilation. Our

review of a district court’s exercise of discretion to depart or vary on the basis of

cultural assimilation is limited to determining whether the court imposed a

substantively reasonable sentence. See United States v. Ellis, 641 F.3d 411, 421-22

(9th Cir. 2011). The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing CazaresOzuna’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The sentence

at the bottom of the advisory Guidelines range is substantively reasonable in light

of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances,

including Cazares-Ozuna’s dangerousness to the community. See U.S.S.G.

§ 2L1.2 cmt. n. 8; Gall, 552 U.S. at 51.

AFFIRMED.
For Survivors

CS295757-B French

Prendre soin d’une personne avec suspicion d’infection au virus Ebola : 

RESTEZ EN SÉCURITÉ PENDANT QUE VOUS ATTENDEZ
CS295757-B French

1 Prendre soin d’une personne avec suspicion d’infection au virus Ebola : 

Restez en sécurité pendant que vous attendez

Restez à une distance 

d’au moins 3 pieds 

(1 mètre) du patient.
CS295757-B French

You’ve survived Ebola! What’s next? 1

Si une personne proche est malade et que vous 

soupçonnez qu’il s’agit d’une infection au virus Ebola, 

demandez du secours. Ne le touchez pas et ne touchez 

pas son sang ou ses fluides corporels (vomissures, selles, 

urine, sueur). Dites-lui de boire beaucoup de Solution 

de réhydratation orale (SRO) ou d’eau. Les patients qui 

boivent beaucoup de SRO dès les premiers symptômes 

ont de bien meilleures chances de survivre.

Prendre soin d’une personne avec suspicion d’infection au virus Ebola : 

Restez en sécurité pendant que vous attendez 1

Restez à une distance 

d’au moins 3 pieds 

(1 mètre) du patient.
CS295757-B French

2 Prendre soin d’une personne avec suspicion d’infection au virus Ebola : 

Restez en sécurité pendant que vous attendez

Restez à une distance 

d’au moins 3 pieds 

(1 mètre) du patient.
CS295757-B French

2 Prendre soin d’une personne avec suspicion d’infection au virus Ebola : 

Restez en sécurité pendant que vous attendez

Une seule personne doit prendre soin du 

patient pendant que vous attendez que l’aide 

arrive. Ne laissez pas d’autres membres de la 

famille s’approcher ou prodiguer des soins. 

Restez à une distance d’au moins 3 pieds 

(1 mètre) du patient. Ne touchez pas la tasse 

dans laquelle boit le patient. Remplissez 

de nouveau la bouteille sans la toucher. 

Ne touchez pas la literie, les draps ou autres 

articles que le patient a touchés pendant 

qu’il/elle était malade.

Restez à une distance 

d’au moins 3 pieds 

(1 mètre) du patient.
CS295757-B French

3 Prendre soin d’une personne avec suspicion d’infection au virus Ebola : 

Restez en sécurité pendant que vous attendez
CS295757-B French

3 Prendre soin d’une personne avec suspicion d’infection au virus Ebola : 

Restez en sécurité pendant que vous attendez

Lorsque vous prenez soin d’un proche, ne le 

touchez pas, et lavez-vous souvent les mains 

à l’eau et au savon ou avec une solution chlorée, 

même si vous ne l’avez pas touché. Portez un 

équipement de protection tel que des gants et 

couvrez toute la peau découverte. Lavez-vous 

les mains chaque fois que vous administrez 

des soins.
CS295757-B French

4 Prendre soin d’une personne avec suspicion d’infection au virus Ebola : 

Restez en sécurité pendant que vous attendez
CS295757-B French

4 Prendre soin d’une personne avec suspicion d’infection au virus Ebola : 

Restez en sécurité pendant que vous attendez

Les patients avec suspicion d’infection au 

virus Ebola doivent recevoir des soins dans un 

établissement de soins. Si l’un de vos proches 

est malade, il ou elle aura de meilleures chances 

de survivre si on lui prodigue des soins dans 

un établissement de soins. Cela contribue 

également à protéger votre famille.
No. 10-10704.

#### Tyrone Davis, Petitioner v. Troy Steele, Warden.

565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1077,

181 L. Ed. 2d 795,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 442.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 845, 132 S. Ct. 161, 181 L. Ed. 2d 75, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6602.
EXHIBIT 4.1


 


[FRONT]


 


Share Certificate


 


INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE
OF WYOMING


 


[LOGO]


 


CUSIP NO. 082395 104


 


BENSATA CORP.


 


AUTHORIZED COMMON STOCK: 190,000,000 SHARES
 PAR VALUE: $0.0001 PER SHARE


 


THIS
CERTIFIES THAT ̈ ̈_________
[Name]


 


IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF _________ [number
of shares]


 


Shares of Bensata Corp. Common Stock transferable
on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.
This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.


 


Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile
signatures of its duly authorized officers.


 


	Date:	 	 
	 	 	 
	Secretary 	 	President 


 



    	 



    	 



    

 


[Bensata Corporate Seal]


 


[BACK]


 


Signature must be guaranteed by a firm which is a member of
a registered national stock exchange, or by a bank (other than a savings bank), or a trust company. The following abbreviations,
when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according
to applicable laws or regulations.


 


Additional abbreviations may also be used though not on the
above list.


 


For Value Received, _______hereby sell, assign and transfer
unto


 


	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER 
	IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 
	 
	 
	 
	(Please print or typewrite name and address,
    including zip code or assignee) 





	 
	 	 	Shares 


 





of the capital stock represented by the within certificate,
and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint


	 	 	 
	 	 	 Attorney 


 





to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named
Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.


 






    	 



    	 



    
  


	Dated: 	 


  


NOTICE: The signature to this assignment must correspond with
the name as written upon the face of the certificate in every particular without alteration or enlargement.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 12, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, March 12, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19I0182. VESTER L. ADAMSON II v. BROOKE RICHARDS ADAMSON.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 18CV0673
Corrected Opinion issued April 18 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 18
- 00498
- CR

——————————— LOSTON MOORE, JR. , Appella nt

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 185 th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1572146

CORRECTED MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellan t Loston Moore , Jr. filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2 (a). See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.2(a). The State has not opposed this motion. We have not issued a decision in the appeal

.2

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot

. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Lloyd, Kelly, and Hightower

. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2(b).
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 09

- 00417

- CV

PHILLIP THOMPSON APPELLANT

V.

JUDITH RODRIGUEZ APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Before the court is the parties ’ “ Joint Motion t o Remand Due to

Settlement.” The motion is granted. Accordingly, we withdraw our opinion and

judgment of September 30 , 2010 ; vacate the trial court’s October 27, 2009

judgment without regard for the merits ; and re mand this case to the trial court for

rendition of judgment i n accordance with the parties’ r ule 11 agreement. See

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B) ; Tex. R. Civ. P. 11

. Costs of this appeal shall be

paid according to the parties’ agreement

. See generally T ex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

ANNE GARDNER

JUSTICE

PANEL: GARDNER and MCCOY, JJ.; and DIXON W. HOLMAN (Senior Justice,

Retired, Sitting by Assig n ment)

DELIVERED: January 13, 2011
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the periodic report of CelLynx Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kevin Pickard, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, hereby certify
as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





Date: August 14, 2009

/s/ Kevin PickardKevin Pickard
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
14 October 2009 *******************************

NSN: 8905 01 579 8004 (TLP) * MONOGRAPH NO: M2B20

 ******************************* 

Item: Tuna, Lemon Pepper (Type B, Form I, Color a, Packing media 1, Flavor 1, Salt/Sodium 

level (a))

Document: CID A-A-20155 Tuna and PKG & QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 140 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Chunk light tuna with black pepper pieces throughout.

Odor: Chunk light tuna, lemon pepper.

Flavor: Chunk light tuna, lemon pepper.

Texture: Moist and tender, not dry, not stringy.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: More than slight color variation within one pouch. Exposed surfaces darkened or 

discolored.

Odor: Ammonia/fishy, rancid, sour.

Flavor: Extremely fishy, rancid, oxidized, bitter.

Texture: Dry, stringy, mushy or soft.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

NA
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3941 STANDARD 44.57 0.34 11.47

Tolerance

1 3941A THIN VIOLET 

LIMIT 45.17 0.49 11.19 0.60 0.15 -0.28 0.68

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Shade Number TAN 499 Piece/Roll Number 3941

DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT January 5, 2018

Fabric Nomenclature

CLOTH, KNIT, FLAME RESISTANT BLEND, 

MOISTURE WICKING, MIDWEIGHT MESH, 

FREE

GL/PD 15-01B

TYPE II CLASS 1

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF