alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 11-6198.

#### Hiawatha Tibbs, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 956, 132 S. Ct. 433,

181 L. Ed. 2d 281,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7172.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 25, 2016

a0518

Order 

Clerk

May 25, 2016

152484

DRAGEN PERKOVIC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 152484

COA: 321531

Wayne CC: 09-019740-NF

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 10, 2015 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). 

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order 

addressing whether the plaintiff, or someone in his behalf, satisfied the notice 

requirements of MCL 500.3145(1). The parties should not submit mere restatements of 

their application papers.
No. 11-5550.

#### Willie Hugh Morris, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 935, 132 S. Ct. 386,

181 L. Ed. 2d 243,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6473.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 148 (Monday, August 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 41271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20592]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Notice of Meetings

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
following meetings of the SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel I in August 
1998.
    A summary of the meetings and rosters of the members may be 
obtained from: Ms. Dee Herman, Committee Management Liaison, SAMHSA, 
Office of Policy and Program Coordination, Division of Extramural 
Activities, Policy, and Review, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 17-89, 
Rockville, Maryland 20857. Telephone: 301-443-7390.
    Substantive program information may be obtained from the 
individuals named as Contact for the meetings listed below.
    The meetings will include the review, discussion and evaluation of 
individual grant applications. These discussions could reveal personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications. 
Accordingly, these meetings are concerned with matters exempt from 
mandatory disclosure in Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) and 5 U.S.C. App. 2, 
Sec. 10(d).

    Committee Name: SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel I (SEP I).
    Meeting Dates: August 17-21, 1998.
    Place: Hyatt Regency--Crystal City, 2799 Jefferson Davis 
Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22202.
    Closed: August 17-20, 1998, 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., August 21, 
1998, 9:00 a.m.-adjournment.
    Panels: Center for Substance Abuse Prevention Cooperative 
Agreements for Establishing a Mentoring/Advocacy Program for High 
Risk Youth and their Families SP 98-005 (Two panels will meet).
    Contacts: Michael Koscinski, M.S.W., Telephone: 301-443-6094 and 
Marco Montoya, Ph.D., Telephone 301-443-7249, Room 17-89, Parklawn 
Building, FAX: 301-443-3437.

    Dated: July 28, 1998.
Jeri Lipov,
Committee Management Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental, Health 
Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-20592 Filed 7-31-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
No. 11-355.

#### Daniel Bernard Manchas, III, Petitioner v. Tabb Bickell, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, et al.

565 U.S. 1060, 132 S. Ct. 766,

181 L. Ed. 2d 485,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8654.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 428 Fed. Appx. 184.
No. 11-7533.

#### Desmond J. Murray, Petitioner v. Florida.

565 U.S. 1134, 132 S. Ct. 1057,

181 L. Ed. 2d 776,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 85.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4715 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4715

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the 2006 
annual coordinated election period for Medicare prescription drug plans 
                        through August 15, 2006.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2006

 Mr. Bradley of New Hampshire (for himself, Mr. Jefferson, Mr. Goode, 
  and Mr. Scott of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 
   the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the 2006 
annual coordinated election period for Medicare prescription drug plans 
                        through August 15, 2006.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. THREE-MONTH EXTENSION OF THE 2006 OPEN ENROLLMENT PERIOD FOR 
              MEDICARE PRESCRIPTION DRUG PLANS.

    Section 1860D-1(b)(1)(B)(iii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395w-101(b)(1)(B)(iii)) is amended by inserting ``, except that in 
applying paragraph (1) of such section, with respect to the annual 
coordinated election period for 2006, such period shall continue 
through August 15, 2006'' before the period.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-7394.

#### Robert Hoyer, Petitioner v. Tom Horne, Attorney General of Arizona, et al.

565 U.S. 1164, 132 S. Ct. 1109,

181 L. Ed. 2d 991,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 887.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Provisional 11/16

*****************************

* MONOGRAPH NO: M4A1P

*****************************

ITEM: Toaster Pastry, Frosted, Brown Sugar Cinnamon, Without Sprinkles, Enriched 

Wheat Flour, Not Fortified, Rectangular, Single Serving (TypeI, Style B, Flavor 3, Frosting 

Option (B), Frain Composition (1), Fortification b, Shape I, Servings (a)

(TPC)

NSN: ITEM SPECIFICATION: CID-A-A-20211A 

PKG&QAP A-A-20211A

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE: 210 Kcals (Primary) 

CHARACTERISTICS OFITEM:

APPEARANCE: Rectangular shape. Crust; uniform, slightly textured, lightly baked. 

Filling; golden tan of uniform thickness.

ODOR AND FLAVOR: Crust; lightly baked. Filling; cinnamon and brown sugar. 

TEXTURE: Crust slightly firm and tender. Filling; thick and sugary.

DEFECTS LIKELY TO OCCUR:

APPEARANCE: Crust; darkened or shiny. Edges broken or crushed. Some migration of 

filling through crust. Filling darkened.

ODOR AND FLAVOR: Crust oxidized, musty or stale. Filling bitter or scorched with loss 

of cinnamon.

TEXTURE: Crust hard, brittle, dry or soggy. Filling dry.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: This product is vacuum packaged. 

Inspect for “inadequate vacuum” by firmly grasping the edges of the package and 

attempting to pull or stretch the material away from the product for a short tome. A 

pouch with adequate vacuum will return to its original shape when pressure is released. If 

vacuum is adequate the product will not move easily within the pouch.

SPECIAL NOTES: Serviceability is significantly affected of more than 1⁄4 of the toaster 

pastry is crushed or if the toaster pastry is broken into more than three parts.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 151 (Thursday, August 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42018-42019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20983]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-695-000]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

Issued July 31, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 27, 1998, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company 
(Tennessee), Post Office Box 2511, Houston, Texas 77252-2511, filed a 
request with the Commission in Docket No. CP98-695-000, pursuant to 
157.205 and 157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural 
Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to operate as jurisdictional certain 
existing delivery point facilities that were initially constructed 
under Section 311(a) of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (NGPA) 
authorized in blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-413-000, 
all as more fully set forth in the request on file with the Commission 
and open to public inspection.
    Tennessee proposes to operate certain existing delivery point 
facilities under Section 7(c) of the NGA and Tennessee's Part 157, 
Subpart F blanket certificate. Tennessee reports that the delivery 
point facilities are located in Franklin County, Alabama, Barren 
County, Kentucky, Scholharie County, New York, and Allen County, 
Kentucky, and that the delivery point facilities were constructed to 
implement transportation agreements under Section 311 of the NGPA. 
Tennessee states that granting the request would enable Tennessee to 
fully utilize these facilities for all transportation services, 
pursuant to Section 311 for the NGPA and Section 7 of the NGA and would 
increase the transportation options of customers on Tennessee's system.
    Tennessee further states that delivery volumes through the existing 
delivery points would not impact Tennessee's peak day and annual 
deliveries. Tennessee reports that the proposed activity is not 
prohibited by its existing tariff and that Tennessee has sufficient 
capacity to accommodate the changes proposed without detriment or 
disadvantage to Tennessee's other customers.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after the 
Commission has issued this notice, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or 
notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the

[[Page 42019]]

request. If no protest is filed within the allowed time, the proposed 
activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day after the 
time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and not 
withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, 
the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the NGA.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20983 Filed 8-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
EXHIBIT 27
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          17,679
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,044
<ALLOWANCES>                                       346
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,546,855
<DEPRECIATION>                                 220,152
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,538,595
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,494,985
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,917,197
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,538,595
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               271,864
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  126,049
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,319
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 66,134
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             66,134
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    50,750
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.87


</TABLE>
No. 10-1144.

#### The Republica Bolivariana de Venezuela, et al., Petitioners v. DRFP L.L.C., dba Skye Ventures.

565 U.S. 1177, 132 S. Ct. 1140,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1016,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1047.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 622 F.3d 513.
No. 11-7764.

#### Brian Hernandez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1169, 132 S. Ct. 1121,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1000,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 585.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

*1001Same case below, 655 F.3d 608.
No. 10-1399.

#### Dana Roberts, Petitioner v. Sea-Land Services, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 1050, 132 S. Ct. 610,

181 L. Ed. 2d 448,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8301.

November 22, 2011.

Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
No. 11-6997.

#### Leon Johnson, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1070, 132 S. Ct. 788,

181 L. Ed. 2d 504,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8306.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 20

- 30601 Summary Calendar

United States of America,

Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus

David Cortez,

Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 1:18

- CR

- 296

- 1

Before King, Smith, and Wilson, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : *
David Cortez ple d guilty to murder, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1111,
and was sentenced to 350 months in prison followed by five years of supervised release. Cortez a ssert s that the district court abused its discretion when it imposed a special condition of his supervised release that mak es him

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 28, 2021
Lyle W. Cayc e Clerk Case: 20-30601 Document: 00515841073 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/28/2021No. 20

- 30601

2 “subject to financial disclosure throughout the period of supervised release,” specifically requiring that he “report all household income to U.S. Probation as requested” along with “all requested financial documentation.” He
contends that this condition is not reasonably related to his offense because his offense did not involve money , and that the condition is unwarranted because he was not ordered to pay a fine or restitution, only a $100 special
assessment. The Govern ment asserts that Cortez’s argument is not ripe for
review.
The question of whether a claim is ripe has jurisdictional implications
and receives de novo review

. U nited States v. Magana , 837 F.3d 457, 459 (5th Cir. 2016). The record reflects that Corte z is not a citizen of the United

States , and he agreed in his plea agreement to “immediate deportation and removal” after his term of imprisonment is complete. As a result, whether he will remain in the United States free of custody long enough to trigger the challenged special supervised release condition is, at best, a matter of conjecture. See id. at 459

. His challenge to the condition is thus not ripe, and

w e therefore lack jurisdiction to consider Cortez’s appeal.
The appeal is DISM I SSED for lack of jurisdiction. Case: 20-30601 Document: 00515841073 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/28/2021
No. 11-7482.

#### Mary Elizabeth Schipke, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1132, 132 S. Ct. 1054,

181 L. Ed. 2d 773,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 281.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 446 Fed. Appx. 51.
No. D-2619.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of David E. Fox.

565 U.S. 1107, 132 S. Ct. 1086,

181 L. Ed. 2d 804,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 433.

January 9, 2012.

David E. Fox, of Washington, District of Columbia, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
No. 11-7246.

#### John Guzman, Petitioner v. Greg McQuiggin, Warden.

565 U.S. 1161, 132 S. Ct. 1099,

181 L. Ed. 2d 986,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 814,

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of--

Laguna Construction Company, Inc. 

Under Contract No. FA8903-06-D-8515 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ASBCA No. 59108 

Carolyn Callaway, Esq. 

Carolyn Callaway, P.C. 

Albuquerque, NM 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Col Matthew J. Mulbarger, USAF 

Air Force Chief Trial Attorney 

Capt Christopher M. Kovach, USAF 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

This appeal has been settled, and payment has been made to the contractor. By 

"Notice of Receipt of Payment" dated 16 February 2016, appellant requests that this 

appeal be dismissed with prejudice. 

WHEREFORE, ASBCA No. 59108 is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 17 February 2016 

r~A ~N Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

~ .. ______ _ 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59108, Appeal of Laguna 

Construction Company, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
************************

• MONOGRAPH NO.: 7A8

************************

ITEM: Coffee, Instant (COF)

NSN: 8955-01-226-1710 ITEM SPECIFICATION: HHH-C-575

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 9

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

 APPEARANCE: Moderate to dark brown, fine powdery or course

particles (spray dried not freeze dried). Reconstituted: Very

dark brown liquid with slightly oily film on the surface.

 ODOR: Low coffee, roasted coffee beans.

 FLAVOR: Low coffee, slight to moderately bitter.

 TEXTURE: Dry: Fine powdery or course particles (spray dried

not freeze dried). Reconstituted: Smooth fluid, all particles

solubilized, little to no sediment.

 ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT 70 DEGREES F: 36 months

 80 DEGREES F: 24 months

 90 DEGREES F: 18 months

 100 DEGREES F: 12 months

EXPECTED DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

 APPEARANCE: Clumpy, caked, hardened in dry state.

 ODOR: Excessively strong coffee, stale coffee.

 FLAVOR: Excessively bitter, stale, rancid oil, excessively

strong coffee flavor.

 TEXTURE: Clumpy, caked, hardened (see Special Notes).

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: Product should be observed

in the dry state initially; follow up with exam in reconstituted

state following package preparation instructions; finally exam

using cream substitute. Do not use plastic, styrofoam or similar

cups. Glass or ceramic ones are recommended.

SPECIAL NOTES: With cream substitute in coffee it should appear

as a tan colored liquid, have a low coffee, non-dairy creamer

odor and flavor, and be a smooth homogeneous fluid. Product is

packed in a package which is designed to yield approximately 8

ounces when rehydrated.
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, John P. Mitola, certify that:
   1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Electric City Corp.;    2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;    3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;    4.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
    a.  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;     b.  evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and     c.  disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
   5.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’sauditors and the Audit Committee of the Registrant’s Board of Directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):
    a.  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and     b.  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.         /s/ John P. Mitola   John P. Mitola   Chief Executive OfficerMay 16, 2004