alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.45


 





AMENDMENT TO AMENDED
AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT ("Amendment") is made and entered into as of June 10, 2014 by and between Daniel F. Carlson ("Executive")
and American Sands Energy Corp., a Delaware corporation, for the purpose of amending the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement,
dated as of May 1 5, 2013 (the "Original Agreement").


 


Whereas, the parties entered into the Original
Agreement to secure the services of Executive;


 


Whereas, the Company and the Executive desire
to amend the terms of the Original Agreement as provided herein;


 


Now, therefore, it is hereby agreed as follows:


 


1. Paragraph 3 shall be amended to read as follows:


 


TERM. The employment of the Executi ve by the Company pursuant
to the provisions of this Agreement shall commence on the effective date hereof and will end on June 30, 2015, unless sooner terminated
as provided herein; provided, however, that if the board determines in good faith that it i s in the best interests of the Company
to hire a Chief Financial Officer with experience in the mining or oil and gas industries, the Company may terminate the Original
Agreement and this Amendment on sixty (60) days written notice.


 


2. Paragraph 4 shall be amended to read as follows:


 


POSITIONS AND DUTiES. The Executive shall serve
as Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of the Company. In connection with the foregoing positions, the Executive shall
have such duties, responsibilities and authority as may from time to time be assigned by the Chief Executive Officer and the
Board. The Executive shall devote his full time and attention to the business and affairs of the Company.


 


3. Except as set forth herein, all other terms of the Original
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment
as of the date first above written.


 





	American Sands Energy Corp.	 	Executive	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	By: /s/ William Gibbs                                	 	BY: /s/ Daniel F.Carlson                        	 
	NAME: William Gibbs	 	Daniel F. Carlson	 
	TITLE: Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-7352.

#### Armando Gomez-Ortiz, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1128, 132 S. Ct. 1042,

181 L. Ed. 2d 766,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 125.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 640 F.3d 412.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 146 (Thursday, July 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40712]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20381]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than August 14, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Karen L. Grandstrand, Vice 
President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, P.O. Box 291, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Adeline M. Morgan, Montgomery, Minnesota; to acquire voting 
shares of F and O, Inc., Montgomery, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly 
acquire voting shares of First National Bank of Montgomery, Montgomery, 
Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 27, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-20381 Filed 7-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
***************************** 

 * MONOGRAPH: FPS/LR 01 

 ***************************** 

ITEM: Food Packet, Survival, Aircraft Life Raft 

ITEM SPECIFICATION: A-A-20331 (Aircraft Life Raft) Type II, 

Style A, Class 1 or 2 

NSN: 8970-01-028-7813 Aircraft Life Raft, Class 1 

NSN: 8970-01-028-7814 Aircraft Life Raft, Class 2 (Kosher, Halal) 

 

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE: 

Aircraft Life Raft – 400 kilocalories per bar 

CHARACTERISTICS:

APPEARANCE: 

Light to dark, golden brown, dense, compressed bar, approximately 4”x 2”x 0.5” 

rectangle, oily, slightly glossy, flat surface. 

ODOR: 

Moderate coconut, sweet, buttery/oily, toasted grain, slight dairy, low to mild vitamin. 

FLAVOR: 

Coconut, buttery, sweet, honey, toasted grain, oil, low to mild vitamin. 

TEXTURE: 

Very firm and dense, slightly crunchy, shortbread texture, oily mouth feel, crumbles in 

mouth. 

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

APPEARANCE: 

Dark brown, or pale uncooked cookie color, excessive crumbs or powder, oiling off, 

irregular shape. 

ODOR: 

Raw or uncooked dough, low sweet, low toasted, low coconut, rancid, cardboard, stale, 

soapy, scorched, strong vitamin. 

 

FLAVOR: 

Rancid oil, low coconut, low/no sweet, sour, citrus, rancid, bitter, soapy, stale, strong 

vitamin, musty. 

TEXTURE: 

Grainy, crystallization, hard, dry, oily, increased crumbliness or brittleness. 

*SPECIAL NOTES: 

Check odor on just opened package for best evaluation of quality. Check for vacuum 

packaging. Product typically not crumbly even when excess handling occurs.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 07, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 07, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16D0417. DATHAN MARQUELL TAYLOR v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

14SR01434
No. 11-6279.

#### Linart Randolph, Petitioner v. McKither Bodison, Warden.

565 U.S. 1152, 132 S. Ct. 1084,

181 L. Ed. 2d 803,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 478.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 987, 132 S. Ct. 520, 181 L. Ed. 2d 366, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7881.
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATIONS

(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

I, Thomas M. Crowder, certify that, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by ECB Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the period presented therein.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                     
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 16, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas M. Crowder                               
|                   |  |  |  | Thomas M. Crowder                                   
|                   |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



51
No. 11-7000.

#### William M. Windsor, Petitioner v. United States, et al.

565 U.S. 1056, 132 S. Ct. 798,

181 L. Ed. 2d 479,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8579.

November 28, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 19, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
ALFRED E. CARDONE 

Is inducted into the Defense Personnel Support Center Hall of Fame this sixteenth day of June 1995 

for his extraordinary leadership and support as Assistant Chief of Contracting in the Subsistence 

Directorate - and for his continuous outstanding mission support throughout his tenure at DPSC – 

from 1958 to 1990. Mr. Cardone managed the acquisition process and resources of one of the 

largest and most diversified procurement missions within the Defense Logistics Agency. His expert 

management and insight were responsible for implementing a number of programs which benefited 

DPSC’s customers, including United States Beef for Europe which contracted for large quantities of 

beef, and the Commercial Products program which improved how food is purchased. He also helped 

shorten the order-ship time to Europe by 15 days resulting in fresher products for European 

commissary customers. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/cardone.htm 1/27/2016
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 1092

MARIE THERESE ASSA’AD

- FALTAS, MD, MPH, for herself and classes she represents , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, South Carolina ’ s Governor; and any and all of their necessary agents; each solely in his official capacity and solely for prospective relief; ALAN M. WILSON, SC Attorney General; and any and all of their necessary agents; each solely in his official capacity and solely for prospective relief; JAY LUCAS, or his successor, SC House Speaker; and any and all of their necessary agents; each solely in his official capacity and solely for prospective relief; DONALD W. BEATTY, SC Chief Justice; and any and all of their necessary ag ents; each solely in his official capacity and solely for prospective relief , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Terry L. Wooten , Senior District Judge. ( 3:20

- cv - 0 1809

- TLW )

Submitted : July 20, 2021 Decided: July 22, 2021

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Marie Therese Assa’ad

- Faltas, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Marie Therese Assa’ad

- Faltas appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice, after a review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, Assa’ad

- Falt as’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Assa’ad

- Faltas v. McMaster , No. 3:20

- cv - 01809

- TLW (D.S.C. Dec. 18, 2020). We deny Assa’ad

- Falt as’ motion to place this appeal in abeyance. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. AFFIRMED

* Although the district court dismissed Assa’ad

- Faltas’ action without prejudice, we have jurisdiction over this appeal. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC , 959 F.3d 605, 612 (4th Cir. 2020), cert. denied , 141 S. Ct. 1376 (2021).
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. No. A-1-CA-36230

5 ANDREW J. OROSCO,

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY

8 Angie K. Schneider, District Judge

9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General

10 Santa Fe, NM

11 for Appellee

12 Todd A. Holmes

13 Alamogordo, NM

14 for Appellant

15 MEMORANDUM OPINION

16 GARCIA, Judge.
2

1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has

3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

4 {2} AFFIRMED.

5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 

6 __________________________________

7 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 _______________________________

10 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

11 _______________________________

12 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          40,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,000
<PP&E>                                       1,529,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                 218,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,421,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,300
<BONDS>                                        759,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     610,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,421,200
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               154,400
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 44,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             44,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    44,700
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 11-490.

#### Joseph Dixon, Petitioner v. Hennepin County Human Services Department, et al.

565 U.S. 1094, 132 S. Ct. 854,

181 L. Ed. 2d 551,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 9000,

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3515 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to prohibit States and 

municipalities from adopting certain laws and ordinances, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2019 

Mr. PETERS (for himself, Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois, and Mr. JOHNSON

of South Dakota) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to prohibit 

States and municipalities from adopting certain laws and 

ordinances, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wage Increase Fair5 ness Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3515 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT 

2 1938. 

3 Section 6 of the Fair Labor Standards Act (29 

4 U.S.C. 206) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(h) Nothing in this subsection shall limit the amount 

7 of a minimum wage set pursuant to this section, or of a 

8 minimum wage set by a State or municipality pursuant 

9 to section 18 of this Act, provided that: notwithstanding 

10 section 18 or any other provision of law, no State or mu11 nicipality shall adopt any law or ordinance which has the 

12 purpose or effect of establishing a minimum wage which 

13 distinguishes, classifies, or establishes any requirement on 

14 an employer based on its status as excluded from the defi15 nition of ‘‘enterprise’’ pursuant to the second sentence of 

16 section 3(r)(1).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
May 31,

DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PILOT PROJECT 2013

Fabric Nomenclature | BERET, WOOL

Shade Number | MAROON 453 Piece/Roll Number

Equipment type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included -
Reflectance
UV Filter -OUT UV Lamp
OFF

|} | WD | Descriptor | Ls | ax | bs | ic | h_| dt | dax | db* | dEcme* |

tandard 15.87 19.59 2.49

NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SAMPLES READ 2 TIMES AND
AVERAGED
No. 11-6805.

#### Maher Suarez, Petitioner v. California.

565 U.S. 1117, 132 S. Ct. 1007,

181 L. Ed. 2d 745,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 171.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, denied.
25 September 2013 *********************

NSN: 8920-01-480-4436 (SPC) MONOGRAPH NO: M4A7

 ************************

Item: Pound cakes, Spice, Trans fat free (Type I, Flavor 7, Style 2)

Document: PCR-C-007, Cakes, Brownies, Muffin Tops and Filled Cakes, Packaged in a Flexible 

Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 280 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Intact, uniform cell (crumb) structure without evidence of excessive heating (materially 

darkened or scorched), and without evidence of compression streaks. May have slightly 

browned edges. Medium beige surface and light beige crumb and may have flecks of 

spices.

Odor: Sweet spice.

Flavor: Sweet spice.

Texture: Dense, firm, tender, moist, and fine grain crumb.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Excessively moist, sticky surface or excessively dry surface and/or excessively dark 

surface and/or crumb. 

Odor: Rancid, scorched, soapy, musty.

Flavor: Rancid, scorched, soapy, musty.

Texture: Excessively moist or excessively dry and crumbly.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

This product should contain an oxygen scavenger packet. If defects such as oxidized or rancid odors or 

flavors exist, they are likely due to package failure or the absence of an oxygen scavenger.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 142 (Friday, July 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19881]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than August 10, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2034:
    1. Arvest Bank Group, Inc., Bentonville, Arkansas, and its wholly 
owned subsidiary, First Bancshares, Inc., Bartlesville, Oklahoma; to 
acquire Ameritrust Corporation, Tulsa, Oklahoma, and thereby engage in 
performing functions or activities that may be performed by a trust 
company, pursuant to Sec.  225.28(b)(5) of Regulation Y; and thereby 
indirectly acquire Americorp Investment Advisors, Inc., Tulsa, 
Oklahoma, and Investment Management, Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma, and thereby 
engage in providing financial and investment advisory services, 
pursuant to Sec.  225.28(b)(6) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 21, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-19881 Filed 7-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
May 29, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Delivery of Aerodrone, LLC Motion Picture and UAS Operations Manual [Docket 

No. FAA-2015-1083]

To Whom it May Concern:

As you are aware, this office represents Aerodrone, LLC regarding the above referenced Petition 

for Exemption, in which Aerodrone seeks regulatory relief to allow commercial operation of small 

unmanned aerial vehicles. Please accept this letter as confirmation that the Petitioner submitted the

Aerodrone, LLC Motion Picture and UAS Operations Manual as a proprietary and confidential document 

to 333exemptions@faa.gov on May 29, 2015.

If you have any other questions, or need any additional information to process this exemption 

request, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Very truly yours, 

Matthew J. Clark

Mark E. McKinnon

 

 

Albany

Atlanta

Brussels

Denver

Los Angeles

Miami

New York

1676 International Drive • Penthouse

McLean, VA 22102

Tel: 703.336.8800

mckennalong.com

Northern Virginia

Orange County

Rancho Santa Fe

San Diego

San Francisco

Seoul

Washington, DC

Mark E. McKinnon

703.336.8714

Matthew J. Clark

703.336.871

Email Address

mmckinnon@mckennalong.com

mclark@mckennalong.com
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4653 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4653

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 21, 2006

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To repeal a prohibition on the use of certain funds for tunneling in 
 certain areas with respect to the Los Angeles to San Fernando Valley 
                    Metro Rail project, California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROHIBITION.

    The second sentence of section 321 of the Department of 
Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1986 (99 Stat. 
1287) is repealed.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 20, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. 11-6835.

#### Bradly Cunningham, Petitioner v. Oregon.

565 U.S. 1096, 132 S. Ct. 851,

181 L. Ed. 2d 555,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8877.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.