alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
02/18/2014 07:41 F~~ 3107256816 AWP-7 

U.S. Department 

oi' Transportation 

western-Pacific Region 

Office of Regional Counsel 

F oderal Aviation 

Administration 

Fi:3 i 3 2014 

via Facsimile to 202-493-5142 

Federal Aviation AdminisiTation 

I-learing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2Wl 000 

81)0 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

(310) 725-7105 

(310) 725-6816 facsimile 

Re: In the Matter of Dennis McGlynn, FDMS No. FAA-2013-0615 

141002 

The Agency anticipates calling Mark Procos, General Manager, with Uninsured United 

Parachute Technologies, LLC (UPT) as a non-party witness at hearing. UPT manufactured the 

tandem harness used in the skydive here. The anomey representing Mr. Procos and UPT 

confirmed that Mr. Procos is available to attend tile hearing in this matter as scheduled on May 

14 and 15, 2014. 

Therefore, it is respectfully requested that you please issue subpoenas to compel the appearance 

of the following person at the hearing in the above-referenced matter: 

Mark Procos, General Manager, Uninsured United Parachute Technologies, LLC, 

c/o 

Robert L. Feldman, Attorney at Law 

Law Offices of Robert L. Feldman 

8900 SW 107 Avenue 

Suite 203 

Miami, Florida 33176 

The witness should be compelled to attend the hearing in this matter. Please provide the 

subpoenas to m.e and I will serve them on the witnesses. 

Sincerely, 

By: ~--------

Christopher Merrill 

Attorney 

cc: Robert Feldman, Esq_
### April Mr, Dennis DeVany Chief, 

### eAS & Domestic Analysis Division Office ofAviation**Depa~ntofTransportatiOn** 1200 New Jersey Avenue,**~~th!ln.rdftn** DC 20590 'Y··Ll 

### !1:38

RE: Tupelo Regional Airport (TUP)**~-\-** l)DT
- 

### o<.,. 

### T**~** 

### 2..DOC'.\

... 030·

### S Dear Mr. DeVany, 

## tam writing in support of 

### Sitver Airways' proposal 

### to provide eommetdaS al:r to**T~** ReglonaiAlfport from the depend on the Tupelo Regional Airpott 

### their air 

### It is very important

### to our local economy air servioe in and 

### out we believe snverAirways' interline ticketing and baggage agreements with .Delta Airlines make this option very attractive to our citizens, In addition, the 30 to 50 seat aircraft are much more desirabre than the 8 seat aircraft offered by Air Choice One

..We are excited 

### about this chance to return to profitability, Thank you for 

### conside.ring our citizens in yourdeliberations.

Mayor Tom 

### Todd Town ·of Ecru, Misstssippi
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 148 (Monday, August 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 41226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20539]



[[Page 41226]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Hawaii Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Hawaii Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 9:00 
a.m and adjourn at 6:00 p.m. on August 22, 1998, at the Hawaii Imin 
International Conference Center, East-West Center, Jefferson Hall, Room 
225, 1777 East-West Road, Honolulu, Hawaii 96848. The Committee will 
hold a community forum on the status of Native Hawaiian civil rights 
five years after the passage of the Apology Bill.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Philip Montez, Director of the Western 
Regional Office, 213-894-3437 (TDD 213-894-3435). Hearing-impaired 
persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign 
language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten 
(10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, July 28, 1998.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 98-20539 Filed 7-31-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
112

Section C: Recommended Funding Levels, by State

North Dakota

Program Intervention Budgets: 2014

Recommended Annual Investment $9.8 million

Deaths in State Caused by Smoking

Annual average smoking-attributable deaths 1,000

Youth aged 0-17 projected to die from smoking 13,900

Annual Costs Incurred in State from Smoking

Total medical $326 million

State Revenue from Tobacco Sales and Settlement

FY 2012 tobacco tax revenue $28.2 million

FY 2012 tobacco settlement payment $31.5 million

Total state revenue from tobacco sales and settlement $59.7 million

Percent Tobacco Revenue to Fund at Recommended Level 16%

Annual Total (Millions) Annual Per Capita

Minimum Recommended Minimum Recommended

I. State and Community Interventions 

Multiple social resources working together will 

have the greatest long-term population impact.

$2.9 $3.7 $4.15 $5.29

II. Mass-Reach Health Communication Interventions 

Media interventions work to prevent smoking initiation, 

promote cessation, and shape social norms.

$0.9 $1.3 $1.29 $1.86

III. Cessation Interventions 

Tobacco use treatment is effective and highly cost-effective. $2.3 $3.5 $3.29 $5.00

IV. Surveillance and Evaluation 

Publicly funded programs should be accountable and 

demonstrate effectiveness.

$0.6 $0.9 $0.87 $1.22

V. Infrastructure, Administration, and Management 

Complex, integrated programs require experienced 

staff to provide fiscal management, accountability, 

and coordination.

$0.3 $0.4 $0.44 $0.61

TOTAL $7.0 $9.8 $10.04 $13.98

Note: A justification for each program element and the rationale for the budget estimates are provided in Section A. The funding estimates presented are based on adjustments for changes in population and cost-of-living increases since Best Practices—2007 was published. The actual 

funding required for implementing programs will vary depending on state characteristics, such as prevalence of tobacco use, sociodemographic 

factors, and other factors. See Appendix E for data sources on deaths, costs, revenue, and state-specific factors. 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • Office on Smoking and Health

www.cdc.gov/tobacco • tobaccoinfo@cdc.gov • 1 (800) CDC-INFO or 1 (800) 232-4636 

2014
# Typical Electrical Transmission Line Problems
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 141 (Thursday, July 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19575]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Michigan Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Michigan Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 1:00 
p.m. and adjourn at 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, August 13, 1998, at the 
Harley Hotel, 4041 Cascade Road SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49546. The purpose 
of the meeting is to hold a press conference to release the Committee's 
report, Community Forum on Race Relations in Grand Rapids, discuss 
civil rights issues, and plan future activities.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Roland Hwang, 
517-373-1476, or Constance M. Davis, Director of the Midwestern 
Regional Office, 312-353-8311 (TDD 312-353-8362). Hearing-impaired 
persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign 
language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten 
(10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, July 14, 1998.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 98-19575 Filed 7-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
#### George M. Myers, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. C. G. Wilson and Arthur T. Vanderbilt, Receivers of Virginia-Carolina Chemical Company, a Corporation, *Defendants in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed March 11, 1926.

*James N. Daniel,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Carter & Solomon,*for Defendants in Error.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore ‘been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS FOR FORM 10-Q**
I, Everett R. Dobson, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AmericanCellular Corporation (the “registrant”);
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and wehave:
     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report isbeing prepared;
     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an quarterly report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
August 13, 2004      AMERICAN CELLULAR CORPORATION
PROPPANT_TYPE PROPPANT

BUXT BAUXITE

CER CERAMIC

GRVL GRAVEL

PERF PERFORATIONS IN OPENHOLE

RCCR RC CERAMIC (RESIN COATED)

RCSD RC SAND (RESIN COATED)

SAND SAND

U UNKNOWN

WLNT WALNUT HULLS

MRBL *

*not defined in the original source of data (IHS Energy, 2011, Petroleu
S Energy, 2011, Petroleum Information Data Model (PIDM) 2.5 data management system: IHS, Inc. [Available from IHS, 15 Inverness Way 
ilable from IHS, 15 Inverness Way East, Englewood, CO 80112.])
18 December 2019 ********************** 

NSN: 8940-01-684-7937 (PPB) * MONOGRAPH M4M6

 **********************

Item: Protein puffs, ring shaped, Barbecue (Type IX, Flavor 1)

Document: A-A-20195, Snack Foods and PKG & QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 130 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Ring shaped puffs that are 1/2 – 3/4-inch in diameter. Reddish-orange exterior color 

that may contain flecks of seasoning. Off-white interior color.

Odor: Moderate smoky barbecue, paprika odor.

Flavor: Moderate smoky barbecue, paprika flavor. Slight to moderate heat and may have a 

slight soy flavor.

Texture: Crispy and crunchy, with a dry center.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Crushed, broken.

Odor: Rancid, stale, burnt, scorched.

Flavor: Rancid, stale, scorched.

Texture: Hard or slightly soft exterior.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

N/A

Special Notes: Serviceability is significantly affected if more than 30 percent of ring shaped protein 

puffs are broken. This product should contain an oxygen scavenger. If defects such as oxidized or 

rancid odors or flavors exist, they are likely due to package failure or the absence of an oxygen 

scavenger.
No. 11-5073.

#### Edward F. Kinane, et al., Petitioners v. United States.

565 U.S. 811, 132 S. Ct. 88,

181 L. Ed. 2d 18,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6862.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until October 24, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
No. 11-7073.

#### Hans Thomas, Petitioner v. Nick J. Ludwick, Warden.

565 U.S. 1097, 132 S. Ct. 856,

181 L. Ed. 2d 557,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8984.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,524
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             301
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     37,474
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          40,474
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            38,849
<LOANS>                                        135,486
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,355
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 186,020
<DEPOSITS>                                     161,287
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,351
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,756
<LONG-TERM>                                      5,469
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,277
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,119)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 186,020
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,610
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,139
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    99
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,748
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,102
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,419
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,330
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      105
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,832
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,190
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,190
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       801
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     6.4
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,128
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,254
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        4
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,355
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,355
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,355


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3603 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3603

 To amend chapter 7 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that in 
  the case of an agency that appeals the ruling of a court under that 
  chapter, and does not prevail on appeal, the court shall award the 
 prevailing party reasonable attorney's fees and costs, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 28, 2019

  Mr. Posey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend chapter 7 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that in 
  the case of an agency that appeals the ruling of a court under that 
  chapter, and does not prevail on appeal, the court shall award the 
 prevailing party reasonable attorney's fees and costs, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AGENCY REQUIRED TO PAY ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS IN 
              UNSUCCESSFUL APPEALS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 7 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 707. Attorney's fees and costs in appeals
    ``In the case that an agency appeals a ruling of a court under this 
chapter, and does not prevail in the appeal, the court shall award 
reasonable attorney's fees and costs to the prevailing party. Such 
award shall be paid out of the administrative budget of the office in 
the agency that filed the appeal.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 7 of 
title 5 is amended by inserting after the item related to section 706 
the following:

``707. Attorney's fees and costs in appeals''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-6476.

#### Patricia J. Curto, Petitioner v. Donald W. Smith, et al.

565 U.S. 1051, 132 S. Ct. 767,

181 L. Ed. 2d 475,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8338.

November 28, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied, and petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
EXHIBIT 32.02

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Concur Technologies, Inc. (Concur) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
John F. Adair, as Chief Financial Officer of Concur, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b), that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Concur.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 11, 2008



By

/s/ John F. AdairJohn F. AdairChief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and shall not be deemed to be filed by Concur for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This certification is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Concur under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
No. 11-7339.

#### Anthony Page, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1128, 132 S. Ct. 1041,

181 L. Ed. 2d 765,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 187.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 657 F.3d 126.
No. 11-6373.

#### Damon Hudson, Petitioner v. Blaine Lafler, Warden.

565 U.S. 988, 132 S. Ct. 524,

181 L. Ed. 2d 368,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7822,

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 421 Fed. Appx. 619.
No. 11-5735.

#### Jose Humberto Ramirez-Arreola, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1095, 132 S. Ct. 844,

181 L. Ed. 2d 553,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8899.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 602.