alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 139 (Tuesday, July 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 39116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19382]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Agency Forms Submitted for OMB Review

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) has submitted 
the following proposal(s) for the collection of information to the 
Office of Management and Budget for review and approval.

SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL(S): 
    (1) Collection title: Report of Medicaid State Office Buy-In 
Status.
    (2) Form(s) submitted: RL-380-F.
    (3) OMB Number: 3220-0185.
    (4) Expiration date of current OMB clearance: 9/30/1998.
    (5) Type of request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    (6) Respondents: State Government.
    (7) Estimated annual number of respondents: 600.
    (8) Total annual responses: 600.
    (9) Total annual reporting hours: 100.
    (10) Collection description: Under the Railroad Retirement Act, the 
Railroad Retirement Board administers the Medicare program for persons 
covered by the railroad retirement system. The collection obtains the 
information needed to determine if certain railroad beneficiaries are 
entitled to receive Supplemental Medical Insurance program coverage 
under a state buy-in agreement in states in which they reside.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR COMMENTS: Copies of the form and supporting 
documents can be obtained from Chuck Mierzwa, the agency clearance 
officer (312-751-3363). Comments regarding the information collection 
should be addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 
North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092 and the OMB reviewer, 
Laura Oliven (202-395-7316), Office of Management and Budget, Room 
10230, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-19382 Filed 7-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
PANELED SIDE 

Table IV, Insignificant Defect – not scored. The number and 

extent of paneled sides does not materially affect the appearance 

or the usability to the container for its intended purpose. Roll 

the can on a flat surface—if it rolls on the end seams without 

bumping the condition is not scoreable as a defect.
Date: 16 April 2020

NSN: 8925-01-008-0960

4 June 2020 ************************

NSN: 8925-01-008-0960 (CCT) MONOGRAPH NO. M8D

 ************************

 

Item: Pan coated candy, Disks, Milk chocolate, plain (Type IV, Style A, Flavor 1)

Document: CID A-A-20177F, Candy and Chocolate Confections and PKG & QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 211 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

The pan coated candy shall have a candy shell with a high gloss and the colors shall be 

vibrant (high chroma) and uniform (not mottled) in hue. Disks shall resemble a double 

convex lens in shape. The chocolate disks shall have a milk chocolate center covered 

with a thin candy shell. The disks shall consist of at least five different colors.

Odor: Sweet, milk chocolate.

Flavor: Sweet exterior coating with a milk chocolate center.

Texture: Crunchy exterior with a firm, smooth center.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance:

Hairline cracking of pan coating (see Special Notes), crushed, mottling and dulling of 

color.

Odor: Oxidative rancidity, low chocolate.

Flavor: Rancid chocolate, low chocolate flavor.

Texture: Moderate hardening of coating and toughening of interior to the point of imparting 

discomfort to the user when chewing.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA
Date: 16 April 2020

NSN: 8925-01-008-0960

Special Notes

Hairline cracking should not be scored as a defect unless it is associated with texture, odor, or flavor 

changes. Score any organoleptic changes as defects and note checking in remarks. The candy is not vitamin 

fortified and should not possess a medicinal odor or flavor.
**CL** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 3 - 0 127 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. CHRISTOPHER ROBIN LEDEAU ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including August 2 6 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the State’s response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 15 2024

07/15/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0127
### Subject:
Dear .Kris, 1111 Ref. Ares(2012)1495908- 14/12/2012 

### EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR MOBILITYANDTRANSPORT Directorate E•Aviation and international transport affairs The Director Brussels, MOVE!fJJR/nd D (2012) MrKrishna Urs Deputy Assistant Secretary for Transportation Affairs U.S. Department ofState



### Differentiated take-offand landing charges for intra-EU and extraEU flights 

### atItalian airports

I would like to inform you about a follow-up to our discussions in the EU-US Joint Committee on the topic of take-off/landing fee charges at Italian airports under the Article 12, paragraph 2 of the EU-US Air Transport Agreement as amended by the Protocol. We have now officially asked the Italian authorities to justify in legal terms their differentiated take-off and landing charges for intra-EU and extra-EU flights. Having investigated this, the differentiation by destination seems not to be linked to the cost of providing a service related to the operation ofaircraft or the processing ofpassengers and cargo coveredbythe airport charges. The enquiry is being launched through a procedure 

### used as a last step before possibly initiating infringement proceduresunderthe EUTreaties. The Member State authorities have lO weekstoprovide a reply. I will keep you in touchwith this as it develops.

# ~~I Yours sincerely,

Matthew Baldwin

European Commission, BE-1049 Bluxelles I Europese Commissie, BE-1049 Brussel· Belgium.
Select PR from drop down

menu Enter material #, plant, SLOC, QTY, and Req Urgency

Once complete hit ‘enter’ and remaining data will auto 

populate
Data above populates after you hit the enter key
Ensure your Functional Area is correct – If not correct check you Fund Code

in the Customer Data tab
Ensure your Fund code is correct
Use this drop down to enter the RDD as needed
Enter Advice Code if required

Once complete click the ‘Park’ button
Make a note of the PR ’10’ series number created
If you have this error check the 

Drop down menu next to the 

Shopping cart to ensure PR is 

Selected
If you have this error ensure you enter your

Cost Center below
If you have this error click the “Assign Source of 

Supply” button below
MATHER HYATT 

Is inducted into the Defense Supply Center Philadelphia Hall of Fame this second day of June 1998 

for his extraordinary leadership and support as the Subsistence Support Officer of DSCP’s European 

Region and for his continuous outstanding mission support throughout his tenure at DSCP from 

1979 to 1993. 

Mr. Hyatt was a pioneer of the European subsistence support system. His vast knowledge during 

Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm proved invaluable, and his efforts served as a prototype 

for developing the current support program for Operations Joint Endeavor and Joint Guard. He also 

developed a program where manufacturers’ representatives of perishable merchandise provided 

guaranteed buybacks for chilled items that had expired. This program alone saved more than $1 

million a year. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/hyatt.htm 1/21/2016
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2017 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2017-B, does hereby certify that:

 

1.                                      NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.                                      The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

 

3.                                      This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.                                      A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2019 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.                                      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2019.

 

6.                                      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 23rd day of March, 2020.

 
| March 23, 2020 |   |                    |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                |   |                    |
|                | By:    | /s/ Carlo Alberto Sisto |
|                | Name:  | Carlo Alberto Sisto     |
|                | Title: | President               |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18359]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-309-000]


Algonquin Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

July 6, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 1, 1998, Algonquin Gas Transmission 
Company (Algonquin) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, to become 
effective August 1, 1998:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 714
First Revised Sheet No. 715

    Algonquin asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the Commission's Order No. 587-G, Standards for Business Practices of 
Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines issued on April 16, 1998 in Docket No. 
RM96-1-007, 83 FERC para.61,029 (1998). Algonquin asserts that the 
revised tariff sheet included herewith reflects Version 1.2 standards 
promulgated by the Gas Industry Standards Board which were adopted by 
the Commission and incorporated by reference in the Commission's 
Regulations.
    Algonquin states that copies of the filing were served on all 
affected customers, interested state commissions and all parties to the 
proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-18359 Filed 7-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In   connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Entech   Environmental
Technologies,  Inc., a Florida  corporation (the "Company"),  on Form 10-QSB for
the period ended  December 31, 2005, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Burr Northrop,  President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

Dated: February 17, 2006.

                                              /s/ Burr Northrop
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Burr Northrop, President and Chief
                                              Executive Officer of Entech
                                              Environmental Technologies, Inc.
ITEM: Pudding, Canned, Vanilla (PCV) ************************

No 10 size can * MONOGRAPH: 3C1

 Primary ************************

NSN: 8940-01-393-8364 ITEM SPECIFICATION: CID A-A 20051

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Smooth, no free liquid and not watery; no weeping upon standing. 

Off-white to yellowish French-vanilla color.

ODOR: Typical of vanilla canned pudding; no off odors.

FLAVOR: Typical of vanilla canned pudding; no off odors.

TEXTURE: Product shall be smooth, contain no free water nor weep upon standing.

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36 months

 100 DEGREES F: 6 months

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

Appearance: May darken, clump, and contain free liquid; may be watery or weep upon 

standing.

Odor: May detect off odors.

Flavor: May detect some rancidity and loss of vanilla flavor.

Texture: May clump and contain free liquid; may be watery or weep upon standing.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 99.1


                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cyber Public Relations, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Maria
Trinh, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of her knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


By:  /s/ Maria Trinh
--------------------------
Maria Trinh
President and CEO
August 14, 2003
18 December 2019 ********************* 

NSN: 8940-01-683-8313 (CRTB) * MONOGRAPH M6P1

 *********************

Item: Trail mix, recovery with beef jerky (Type II)

Document: PCR-T-014, Trail Mix, Recovery, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 275 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

General: Free-flowing mixture of beef jerky, almonds and cranberries.

Beef jerky: Rectangular pieces approximately 1/2 inch in length by 1/4 inch in width 

by 1/8 inch thick. Dark reddish-brown to dark brown surface color with a reddishbrown interior color. Dried and slightly wrinkled exterior surface.

Almonds: Raw, shelled.

Cranberries: Red to dark red cranberry color.

Odor: Smoked, dried, cured, teriyaki beef.

Flavor: Smoked, dried, cured, teriyaki, salty beef, raw almond, sour and sweet cranberry.

Texture:

Beef jerky: Firm and chewy and shall be fibrous and cohesive.

Almonds: Firm to crunchy.

Cranberries: Moist and chewy.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Beef jerky, almonds, and cranberries darkened, clumped together and/or crushed or 

broken.

Odor: Stale, rancid. Absence of smoked, dried, cured, teriyaki beef.

Flavor:

Stale, rancid, absence of smoked, dried, cured, teriyaki, salty beef, raw almond, sour 

and sweet cranberry.

Cranberries: Loss of fruity character, musty fermented, caramelized.

Texture:

Beef jerky: Increased chewiness, hard, difficult to chew.

Almonds: Soft or chewy.

Cranberries: Extreme chewiness or stickiness.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures:

Product is considered serviceable if clumps of ingredients can be broken with light pressure.

Special Notes: This pouched product shall be nitrogen flushed or contain an oxygen scavenger. If 

defects such as oxidized or rancid odors exist, they are likely due to package failure or the absence of 

an oxygen scavenger.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 146 (Thursday, July 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40786-40787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20404]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Customs Service
[T.D. 98-63]


Revocation of Customs Broker License

AGENCY: Customs Service, Department of the Treasury .

ACTION: Broker license revocation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice is hereby given that the Commissioner of Customs, pursuant 
to section 641, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1641), and 
Secs. 111.52 and 111.74 of the Customs regulations, as amended (19 CFR 
111.52 and 111.74), is canceling the following Customs broker licenses 
without prejudice.

[[Page 40787]]



------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Port                       Individual          License # 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
New York.........................  Michael Maraventano.....        03186
New York.........................  Fast Cargo, Inc.........        10026
New York.........................  Alex Zadroga............        06263
New York.........................  Judith M. Barzilay......        16619
Los Angeles......................  Ronald G. Sleeis........        05092
Laredo...........................  Sandra L. Herrera.......        11622
Washington, DC...................  Christopher M. Schmitt..        11577
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: July 24, 1998.
Philip Metzger,
Director, Trade Compliance.
[FR Doc. 98-20404 Filed 7-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
No. 10-6888.

#### Surf Moore, Petitioner v. New Jersey.

562 U.S. 1112, 131 S. Ct. 826,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9661.

178 L. Ed. 2d 563,

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 385 Fed. Appx. 65.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 10, 2016

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

JAMES M. ROBINSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

VALERIE ESTRADA,

Respondent - Appellee.

No. 15-1370

(D.C. No. 1:12-CV-02659-LTB)

(D. Colo.)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY*

Before GORSUCH, BALDOCK, and McHUGH, Circuit Judges.

After a Colorado jury convicted him of public indecency, Mr. Robinson

filed a habeas petition challenging his conviction under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. But

when Mr. Robinson repeatedly disregarded court deadlines without a colorable

excuse, the court dismissed the petition for lack of prosecution under Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Mr. Robinson asks us to grant him a certificate of

appealability and hold that the district court abused its discretion in reaching this

decision, but we don’t see how we might.

*

 This order is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of

the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its

persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
In an ideal world all cases would be resolved on their merits rather than on

the basis of process fouls, but we do not live in an ideal world. Sometimes people

miss court deadlines by accident or for a good reason, and often their mistakes are

excused. But no litigant can without good reason repeatedly disregard court

orders and fail to expect that dismissal will follow. See, e.g., Lee v. Max Int’l,

LLC, 638 F.3d 1318, 1323-24 (10th Cir. 2011).

That’s what happened here. After Mr. Robinson filed his federal habeas

petition, the district court realized he hadn’t exhausted his state remedies. Rather

than dismiss the case outright, though, the court offered to stay the federal

proceedings until Mr. Robinson could exhaust the state remedies still available to

him. The court clearly and pointedly advised Mr. Robinson that he would have

thirty days to reopen his habeas petition once the state proceedings finished. But

rather than following those directions, Mr. Robinson waited nearly a year after

exhausting his state remedies before moving to reopen his federal habeas action

and he offered no colorable excuse or justification for his delay. Because of this,

the district court issued an order asking Mr. Robinson to show cause within thirty

days why his action should not be dismissed. But Mr. Robinson disregarded this

deadline too, and did so again without offering any colorable excuse or

justification. Only then did the district court finally dismiss his case. Under

these circumstances it cannot reasonably be disputed that the district court acted

within the discretion afforded it by law. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Lee, 638

- 2 -
F.3d at 1321-24. Mr. Robinson’s request for a certificate of appealability is

denied and this appeal is dismissed. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Neil M. Gorsuch

Circuit Judge

- 3 -