alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DOE Issues Notice of Reopening of Public Comment Period for 

Proposed Determination of Commercial and Industrial Compressors as 

Covered Equipment

The Department of Energy has issued a pre-publication Federal Register notice of reopening of public comment 

period for proposed determination of commercial and industrial compressors as covered equipment.

• Find more information on the rulemaking, including milestones, statutory authority, rulemaking documents, 

and any other related rulemakings. 

• All notices, public comments, public meeting transcripts, and supporting documents associated with this 

rulemaking are included in Docket No. EERE–2012–BT–DET–0033.

• Find information about how to comment on the rulemaking. The public comment period closes February 28, 

2013. When submitting comments, please only reference the Federal Register version of the notice.

• Find product information about current standards and test procedures; recent product updates; waivers, 

exceptions, and exemptions; the statutory authority; historical information; and contact information. 

This email is part of a new effort by the Department of Energy to notify all interested persons of recently issued 

Federal Register notices and other significant program developments under the Appliance and Equipment Standards 

Program. By following the link provided below, you may change your Subscriber Preferences to remove your email 

address from the product-specific lists being used by DOE under this program.
Assignment Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.14.1 
 ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT 
 FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL PROPERTY

 THIS ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL PROPERTY (the
“Assignment”) is made and entered into as of the 22nd day of February, 2012 by and between WOODFIELD ACQUISITIONS, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company (“Assignor”) and GGT WHITEHALL VENTURE NC, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (“Assignee”). 
 WHEREAS, Whitehall Corporate Center
Development Limited Partnership, a North Carolina limited partnership (“Seller”), as seller, and Assignor, as purchaser, are parties to that certain Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property dated June 30, 2011, as
amended by that certain First Amendment to Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property dated January 10, 2012 and by that certain Second Amendment to Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property dated February 14, 2012 (as
amended, the “Purchase Agreement”), with respect to certain real property located in the City of Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, as more particularly described in said Purchase Agreement; and 

WHEREAS, Assignor has agreed to assign all of its obligations, rights, title and interests in, to and under said Purchase
Agreement to Assignee, and Assignee has agreed to assume all of Assignor’s obligations, rights, title and interests in, to and under the Purchase Agreement from Assignor. 

NOW, THEREFORE, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, Assignor hereby
assigns to Assignee all of its obligations, rights, title and interest in, to and under the Purchase Agreement, and Assignee hereby assumes all of Assignor’s obligations, rights, title and interest in, to and under the Purchase Agreement.

 [SIGNATURES INCLUDED ON FOLLOWING PAGES] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Assignment to be
executed by the persons duly empowered to bind the parties to perform their respective obligations hereunder as of the day and year first above written. 
  

					
	 ASSIGNOR:

	
	 WOODFIELD ACQUISITIONS, LLC,
 a North Carolina limited liability company

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Chad M. Hagler

	Name:	 	Chad M. Hagler
	Title:	 	Authorized Representative
	
	 ASSIGNEE:

	
	 GGT WHITEHALL VENTURE NC, LLC
 a Delaware limited liability company

		
	By:	 	WF Arrowood, LLC, its Operating Member
			
		 	By:	 	 /s/ Chad M. Hagler

		 	Name:	 	Chad M. Hagler
		 	Title:	 	Manager
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST DISTRICT

2000 Drayton Drive

Tallahassee, Florida 32399

- 0950

Telephone No. (850)488

- 6151

May 25, 2017

CASE NO. : 1D14

- 1382

L.T. No.: 01

- 2012

- CF

- 003050

- A

MATTHEW JOSEPH DETTLE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Appellant / Petitioner(s),

BY ORDER OF THE COURT : Appellee / Respondent(s)

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

A judge of this court requested that this cause be considered en banc in accordance with

Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.331(c). All judges in regular active service have voted on the

request. Less than a majority of those judges voted in favor of rehearing en banc. Accordingly, the

request for rehearing en banc is denied.

ROBERTS, C.J., and WOLF, LEWIS, B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, ROWE, RAY,

OSTERHAUS, KELSEY, WINOKUR, JAY, WINSOR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

MAKAR and BILBREY, JJ., would grant the motion for rehearing en banc

.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is (a true copy of) the original court order.

Served:

Hon. Pamela Jo Bondi, A. G.

Thomas H. Duffy, A.A.G.

Justin D. Chapman, A. A. G.

Hon. Robert Groeb, Judge Hon. Andy Thomas, P.D.

Glen P. Gifford, A. P. D.

Jessica Judith Dasilva Gilbert A. Schaffnit

Courtenay H. Miller, A. P. D.

Hon. J. K. "Jess" Irby, Clerk

am
Date of Posting...................

Date for Receipt of Quotes....

Cutoff Time for Receipt.........

Item #

(K0000) Location Lot # Type Origin

# of 

Units Bulk Wt (lbs) WO3 (%)

NOTE: Minimum bid is one entire line item.

* All quotes must be submitted through the DLA-Strategic Materials Sales Portal

and quoters must be pre-approved in the site to participate

DLA - Strategic Materials Sales Portal

Tungsten Ores and Concentrates Offering

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Basic Ordering Agreement... DLA-Stockpile Materials-001-(BOA) - Tungsten Ores & Concentrates

October 12, 2021

October 13, 2021

12:00pm

WO3 

(lbsWO3) W (lbsW ) WO3 (STU) 

0598 Scotia, NY P-2810-BR Scheelite Unknown 251 100931 72.9 73578.699 58347.908 3678.914

0664 Scotia, NY P-2839-D Synthetic Scheelite Australia 285 89972 71.18 64042.070 50785.361 3202.078

0732 Scotia, NY P-2998-C Synthetic Scheelite Unknown 75 80101 71.39 57184.104 45346.994 2859.218

0556 Scotia, NY P-2999-E Synthetic Scheelite Argentina 205 61676 72.31 44597.916 35366.147 2229.871

Totals: 332680 239403 189846 11970
No. 11-6112.

#### Fernando Cuellar-Montejo and Enrique Cuellar-Montejo, Petitioners v. United States.

565 U.S. 954, 132 S. Ct. 428,

181 L. Ed. 2d 278,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7286.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 16-1029V Filed: April 25, 2017

UNPUBLISHED

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * DANIEL MCNEAL, *

* Petitioner, * Damages Decision Based on Proffer; v. * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Shoulder * Injury Related to Vaccine Administration SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SIRVA ”); Special Processing Unit AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“SPU”)

* Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Leah V. Durant, Law Offices, Wa shington, DC, for petitioner. Robert P. Coleman, III, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

Dorsey , Chief Special Master:

On August 19, 2016, Daniel McNeal (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Inju ry Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner al leges that he suffered from a left shoulder injury as a result of receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on November 3, 2015. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On April 25, 2017, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On April 25, 2017 , respondent filed a Rule 4(c) report and proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer ”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $154,338.14. Rule 4/Proffer at 4. In the Rule 4/Proffer, respondent represented that

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Cour t of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other inform ation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, t he undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Ac t will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2 petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Rule 4/Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Rule 4/Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner a lump sum payment of $154,338.14, in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Daniel McNeal. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be ava ilable under § 300aa-15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this

decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment c an be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

December 2, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00420

- CR

Aaron POUCH
, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court
, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B19843

- 1 Honorable M. Rex Emerson , Ju dge Presiding



### O R D E R

On November 22
, 202 2 , Appellant’s court

- appointed appellate counsel filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw

. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967) ; High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978) . In counsel’s certification to this court, Appellant’s counsel explained that he took the following steps:

• notified Appellant that counsel filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw, and provide d Appellant with a copy of the documents;

• advised Appellant of his right to review the appellate record and file a pro se brief; and

• provided Appellant with a letter to request a copy of the appellate record

. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 318

– 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Ex parte Owens , 206 S.W.3d 670 , 674 n. 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Meza v. State , 206 S.W.3d 684 , 688

– 89 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). The State filed a letter conditionally waiving its right to file a brief. If Appellant desires to file a pro se brief, we order Appellant to do so within thirty days of the date of this order

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). If Appellant files a pro se br ief, the State may file a responsive brief not later than thirty days after the date Appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. See id. R. 38.6(b).If this court determines Appellant’s appeal is frivolous, Appellant may file a petition for

discretio nary review with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 68.4. Appellant must file the petition with the Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after this court issues its judgment. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 68.2(a). The petition should be addressed to Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals, P.O. Box 12308, Austin, Texas 78711.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is held in abeyance pend ing further order of this court.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affix ed the seal of the said court on this 2nd day of December, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ
, Clerk of Court
No. 11-213.

#### Sunny O. Ekokotu, Petitioner v. Federal Express Corporation.

565 U.S. 944, 132 S. Ct. 420,

181 L. Ed. 2d 260,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7433.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

*261Same case below, 408 Fed. Appx. 331.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**





In
      connection with the periodic report of Infosmart Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Parker Seto, Chief Executive Officer
      (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
      hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
      States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.





Date:
                May 20, 2008
            /s/
                Parker SetoParker
                SetoChief
                Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer)
(1) Adjusting Price 21.88 CWT

(2) Base Price 18.66 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT 3.22

(4) Price change per gallon 0.28

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon 0.14

Price change per quart 0.07 

Price change per pint 0.03

Price change per 12-oz pg. 0.03

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) 0.02

Price change per half pint 0.02

(6) Price adjustment per gallon 0.28

Price adjustment per half gallon 0.14

Price adjustment per quart 0.07

Price adjustment per pint 0.03

Price change per 12-oz pg. 0.03

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) 0.02

Price adjustment per half pint 0.02

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Marketing Area Federal Milk Order #51

 Effective Date: August 2, 2020
Exhibit 31

Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CD 2017-CD5 Mortgage Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.; National Tax Search, LLC; Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC; AEGON USA Realty Advisors, LLC; KeyBank National Association; Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC; and Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC.

 

Date:March 26, 2020

|  | /s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

CD 2017-CD5 Mortgage Trust Certifications
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $9.52 CWT 0.965 $9.1868

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.8972 LB 3.5 $6.6402

Class I Price $15.8270

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $9.37 CWT 0.965 $9.0421

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.8442 LB 3.5 $6.4547

Class I Price $15.4968

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.3303

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0284

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0142

Price change per quart $0.0071

Price change per pint $0.0035

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0026

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0021

Price change per half pint $0.0018

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.03

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.01

Price adjustment per quart $0.01

Price adjustment per pint $0.00

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: May 3, 2015
No. 11-7223.

#### Glenn Harper, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1087, 132 S. Ct. 834,

181 L. Ed. 2d 540,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8751.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 421 Fed. Appx. 108.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

STATE FARM COUNTY MUTUAL

INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS,

Appellant,

v.

ADEL MONTES AND JESUS

MONTES,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 15

- 00166

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2013

- DCV2524 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the agreed motion to dismiss the appeal and

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed. We therefore

dismiss the appeal. We further order costs of the appeal are taxed against the party incurring

them, and this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS S O ORDERED THIS 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015.

STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3314 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 17, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1750 McCulloch Boulevard North in Lake 

Havasu City, Arizona, as the ‘‘Lake Havasu City Combat 

Veterans Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3314 RFS

1 SECTION 1. LAKE HAVASU CITY COMBAT VETERANS MEMO2 RIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1750 McCulloch Boulevard 

5 North in Lake Havasu City, Arizona, shall be known and 

6 designated as the ‘‘Lake Havasu City Combat Veterans 

7 Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lake Havasu City 

12 Combat Veterans Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 16, 

2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Date: September 17, 2010 *******************

NSN: 8915-01-588-9887 (PAG) MONOGRAPH: M3A

 ******************* 

Item: Potatoes, Au Gratin, Flexible Pouch

Document: PCR-P-048, Potatoes, Au Gratin, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 170 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Cooked sliced potatoes uniformly distributed throughout a cheese sauce.

Potatoes: random size, slices not less than 3/16 inch in thickness, an off-white color, a 

minimum of 5 intact potato slices with minimum dimensions of 1.5 inches in length by 

1 inch in width throughout the slice.

Cheese sauce: creamy, smooth, homogenous, moderately thick, a light yellow-orange 

color.

Odor: Cooked potatoes in a cheese sauce.

Flavor: Cooked potatoes in a cheese sauce.

Texture:

Potatoes: slightly firm and tender.

Cheese sauce: creamy, smooth, homogenous, moderately thick.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Thickened or curdled cheese sauce, browning of sauce and/or potato slices, separation 

of sauce, excessively thick or thin sauce.

Odor: Scorched milk odor, rancid.

Flavor: Retorted cheese flavor, musty potato slices, rancid, scorched milk.

Texture: Potatoes: excessively firm or mushy.

Sauce: excessively thick or gummy, separated and/or pasty.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

NA