UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 10-Q


(Mark One)





xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDEDJUNE 30, 2010





oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.





Commission File No. 000-27147





CelLynx Group, Inc.





(Exact name of registrant as specified in it charter)





Nevada

95-4705831(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or

(IRS Employer Identificationorganization)

No.)





25910 Acero, Suite 370


Mission Viejo, California 92691




(Address of principal executive offices)





(949) 305-5290





(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YesxNoo





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).


Yes  o No o





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):




Large Accelerated filer  o
Non-Accelerated FileroAccelerated Filer  o
Smaller Reporting Company x


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YesoNox





APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:





Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 171,752,572 issued and outstanding as of August 18, 2010.













TABLE OF CONTENTS





PagePART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
3Item 1.
Financial Statements
3Item 2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
25Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
32Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
32PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
32Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
32Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
33Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
33Item 4.
(Removed and Reserved)
33Item 5.
Other Information
33Item 6.
Exhibits
33











2


Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION





Item 1.  Financial Statements





CELLYNX GROUP, INC.


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS







June 30,


September 30,2010


2009(unaudited)ASSETSCURRENT ASSETS:Cash

$
3,364


$
6,776Accounts receivable


14,233



-Inventory


88,642



16,316Prepaids and other current assets


259,932



15,750TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS


366,171



38,842EQUIPMENT, net


7,415



11,359INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net


118,498



97,180OTHER ASSETS


16,190



16,190TOTAL ASSETS

$
508,274


$
163,571LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICITCURRENT LIABILITIES:Accounts payable and accrued expenses

$
1,342,624


$
832,634Accrued interest


31,425



28,334Convertible stockholder notes, net of debt discount of $1,092as of September 30, 2009, respectively


-



101,908Convertible promissory notes, net of debt discount of $41,326 and $0as of June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively


221,030



100,000TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES


1,595,079



1,062,876LONG TERM LIABILITIES:Convertible promissory note, net of debt discount of  $126,795as of September 30, 2009


-



135,561TOTAL LIABILITIES


1,595,079



1,198,437COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIESSTOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:Series A preferred stock, $0.001 par value;100,000,000 shares authorized;nil shares issued and outstanding


-



-Common stock, $0.001 par value, 400,000,000 shares authorized; 171,752,572 and137,379,397 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2010 andSeptember 30, 2009, respectively


171,752



137,379Additional paid-in capital


13,998,536



10,501,965Accumulated deficit


(15,257,093
)


(11,674,210
)Total stockholders' deficit


(1,086,805
)


(1,034,866
)TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

$
508,274


$
163,571The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


3







CELLYNX GROUP, INC.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSFOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009Three Months Ended June 30,


Nine Months Ended June 30,2010


2009


2010


2009(unaudited)


(unaudited)


(unaudited)


(unaudited)Net Revenue

$
28,356


$
-


$
76,179


$
-Cost of Revenue


16,717



-



50,557



-Gross profit


11,639



-



25,622



-Operating expensesResearch and development


20,143



78,393



67,514



290,492General and administrative


840,413



1,302,290



3,428,121



2,653,517Total operating expenses


860,556



1,380,683



3,495,635



2,944,009Loss from operations

$
(848,917
)

$
(1,380,683
)

$
(3,470,013
)

$
(2,944,009
)Non-operating income (expense):Interest and financing costs


(30,972
)


(36,841
)


(112,870
)


(141,007
)Change in fair value of accrued beneficial conversion liability


-



-



-



251,410Change in fair value of accrued warrant liability


-



-



-



(419,571
)Total non-operating expense


(30,972
)


(36,841
)


(112,870
)


(309,168
)Loss before provision for income taxes


(879,889
)


(1,417,524
)


(3,582,883
)


(3,253,177
)Provision for income taxes


-



-



-



-Net loss

$
(879,889
)

$
(1,417,524
)

$
(3,582,883
)

$
(3,253,177
)Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic and Diluted:


171,697,572



130,965,347



157,458,484



121,491,043Loss per share - Basic and Diluted:

$
(0.01
)

$
(0.01
)

$
(0.02
)

$
(0.03
)The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.











4


CELLYNX GROUP, INC.


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS








Nine Months Ended June 30,2010


2009(unaudited)


(unaudited)CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:Net loss

$
(3,582,883
)

$
(3,253,177
)Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cashused in operating activities:Depreciation and amortization


5,491



4,968Warrants issued for services


327,087



111,155Stock issued for services


441,185



721,500Stock issued for interest payment


20,323



-Stock compensation expense for options issued to employees and consultants


851,217



604,089Change in fair value of accrued beneficial conversion liability


-



(251,410
)Change in fair value of accrued warrant liability


-



419,571Amortization of debt discount


86,561



130,579Changes in operating assets and liabilities:Change in accounts receivable


(14,233
)


-Change in inventory


(72,326
)


-Change in other assets


15,750



2,198Change in accounts payable, accrued expenses and accrued interest


513,081



439,794Net cash used in operating activities


(1,408,747
)


(1,070,733
)CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:Purchase of equipment


-



(6,663
)Purchase of intangible assets


(22,865
)


(16,392
)Net cash used in investing activities


(22,865
)


(23,055
)CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:Proceeds from notes payable


-



75,000Proceeds from related parties


-



68,000Payment of convertible stockholder notes


(45,000
)


-Payment of convertible promissory notes


(37,500
)


-Advances from related parties


-



-Proceeds from issuance of common stock


1,544,450



378,500Payment of offering costs associated with the sale of common stock


(33,750
)


-Net cash provided by financing activities


1,428,200



521,500NET DECREASE IN CASH


(3,412
)


(572,288
)CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD


6,776



599,024CASH, END OF PERIOD

$
3,364


$
26,736SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:Cash paid for interest

$
-


$
11,389Cash paid for income taxes

$
-


$
-SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING:Issuance of stock for licensing agreement

$
-


$
7,429Reclassification of share-based compensation liability to additional paid-in capital

$
-


$
2,701,572Reclassification of accrued beneficial conversion liability to additional paid-in capital

$
-


$
2,120,181Reclassification of accrued warrant liability to additional paid-in capital

$
-


$
1,023,564Conversion of convertible note payable to common stock

$
140,823


$
-Issuance of common stock for prepaid services

$
353,426


$
-The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.  5
 CELLYNX GROUP, INC.
 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
 (unaudited)





Note 1 - Organization





The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared by CelLynx Group, Inc., formerly known as NorPac Technologies, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “CelLynx” or the “Company”), pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information furnished herein reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly present the operating results for the respective periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally present in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending September 30, 2010.





Organization and Line of Business





The Company was originally incorporated under the laws of the State of Minnesota on April 1, 1998.





On July 23, 2008, prior to the closing of a Share Exchange Agreement (described below), the Company entered into a Regulation S Subscription Agreement pursuant to which the Company issued 10,500,000 shares of its common stock and warrants to purchase 10,500,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.20 per share to non-U.S. persons for an aggregate purchase price of $1,575,000.





On July 24, 2008, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement, as amended, with CelLynx, Inc., a California corporation ("CelLynx-California"), and twenty-three CelLynx-California shareholders who, immediately prior to the closing of the transaction, collectively held 100% of CelLynx-California’s issued and outstanding shares of capital stock.  As a result, the CelLynx-California shareholders were to receive 77,970,956 shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for 100%, or 61,983,580 shares, of CelLynx-California’s common stock.  However, the Company had only 41,402,110 authorized, unissued and unreserved shares of common stock available, after taking into account the shares of common stock issued in the July 23, 2008, financing described above.  Pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement, in the event that there was an insufficient number of authorized but unissued and unreserved common stock to complete the transaction, the Company was to issue all of the available authorized but unissued and unreserved common stock to the CelLynx-California shareholders in a pro rata manner and then establish a class of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) and issue that number of shares of Series A Preferred Stock such that the common stock underlying the Series A Preferred Stock plus the common stock actually issued to the CelLynx-California shareholders would equal the total number of shares of common stock due to the CelLynx-California shareholders under the Share Exchange Agreement.  As a result, the Company issued to the CelLynx-California shareholders an aggregate of 32,454,922 shares of common stock and 45,516,034 shares of Series A Preferred Stock.  The Series A Preferred Stock automatically would convert into common stock on a one-to-one ratio upon the authorized capital stock of the Company being increased to include not less than 150,000,000 shares of common stock.





On November 7, 2008, the Company amended the Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares to 400,000,000 and converted the 45,516,034 shares of Series A Preferred Stock into 45,516,034 shares of the Company’s common stock.





The exchange of shares with CelLynx-California was accounted for as a reverse acquisition under the purchase method of accounting because the shareholders of CelLynx-California obtained control of the Company. On August 5, 2008, NorPac Technologies, Inc., changed its name to CelLynx Group, Inc.  Accordingly, the merger of CelLynx-California into the Company was recorded as a recapitalization of CelLynx-California, with CelLynx-California being treated as the continuing entity. The historical financial statements presented are the financial statements of CelLynx-California. The Share Exchange Agreement has been treated as a recapitalization and not as a business combination; therefore, no pro forma information is disclosed. At the date of the reverse merger transaction, the net assets of the legal acquirer CelLynx Group, Inc., were $1,248,748.





6
 CELLYNX GROUP, INC.
 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
 (unaudited)


As a result of the reverse merger transactions described above, the historical financial statements presented are those of CelLynx-California, the operating entity.  Each CelLynx-California shareholder received 1.2579292 shares of stock in the Company for each share of CelLynx-California capital stock.  All shares and per-share information have been retroactively restated for all periods presented to reflect the reverse merger transaction.





On October 27, 2008, the Board of Directors approved a change of the Company’s fiscal year end from June 30 to September 30 to correspond to the fiscal year of CelLynx-California.  The fiscal year end change was effective for the year ended September 30, 2008.





The Company develops and manufactures cellular network extenders which enable users to obtain stronger signals and better reception.





Going Concern and Exiting Development Stage





These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company is unlikely to pay dividends or generate significant earnings in the immediate or foreseeable future. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its stockholders, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary equity and debt financing to continue operations and to generate sustainable revenue. There is no guarantee that the Company will be able to raise adequate equity or debt financing or generate profitable operations. For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company incurred a net loss of $879,889 and $3,582,883, respectively.  For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009, the Company incurred a net loss of $1,417,524 and $3,253,177, respectively.  As of June 30, 2010, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $15,257,093.  Further, as of June 30, 2010, and September 30, 2009, the Company had negative working capital of $1,228,908 and $1,024,034, respectively.  Moreover, the Company had negative cash flows from operations of $1,408,747 and $1,070,733 for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.  During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company raised $1,544,450 through the issuance of common stock, and management intends to raise additional funds through equity or debt financing and to generate cash from the sale of the Company’s products and from license fees as further described below.





The Company was in the development stage through June 30, 2009.  In July 2009, the Company received the first 220 units of the Company’s cellular network extender, The Road Warrior, from its manufacturer.  As of July 2009, the Company was fully operational and as such was no longer considered a development stage company.  During the period that the Company was considered a development stage company, the Company incurred accumulated losses of approximately $10,948,625.





Master Global Marketing and Distribution Agreement





On July 22, 2008, CelLynx entered into a Master Global Marketing and Distribution Agreement (the “Distribution Agreement”) with Dollardex Group Corp., a company organized under the laws of Panama (“Dollardex”), whereby Dollardex agreed to act as CelLynx’s exclusive distributor of CelLynx’s products and related accessories in the following regions: Canada, South America, Europe, Middle East, China, India, Australia, Africa and South East Asia.





7
 CELLYNX GROUP, INC.
 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
 (unaudited)


Subsequently, on April 29, 2010, we entered into a new master global marketing and distribution agreement (the “2010 Agreement”) that amended the prior agreement dated July 22, 2008 with Dollardex.  Under the 2010 Agreement, Dollardex proposed to establish a distribution network of our line of products in the territories, as defined, as well as to assist the international dealers in the promotion and marketing of our products.  As consideration for exclusive licenses, the Company would receive an aggregate of $11 million, payable to the Company from May 2010 to April 2011.  The funding is subject to terms and condition, as set forth in the 2010 Agreement.  Both parties can terminate the agreement in the event of breach or default and subject to certain conditions allowing for a cure of default.





On June 14, 2010, the Company and Dollardex entered into Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the 2010 Agreement.  Pursuant to Amendment No. 1, the Company and Dollardex agreed to grant an additional termination right to the Company.  In addition to those rights listed in the original 2010 Agreement, the Company and Dolladex agreed that in the event that Dollardex failed to provide by July 10, 2010, the payments required to be provided by May 31, 2010 (the “May Payment”), and July 1, 2010 (the “July Payment”), as originally provided in the 2010 Agreement, the Company would have the right to immediately terminate the 2010 Agreement.  The Company and Dollardex also agreed that if Dollardex made the May and July Payments due by the revised payment date of July 10, 2010, all other payment dates listed in the 2010 Agreement would be extended automatically by 30 days.





Additionally, in Amendment No. 1, the Company and Dollardex agreed that nothing contained in the Amendment would be deemed to affect or be construed to affect any of the terms or provisions of the 2010 Agreement nor impair the validity or enforceability thereof or any rights or powers which the Company now or hereafter may have under or by virtue of the 2010 Agreement in case of any default or non-fulfillment of the terms of the 2010 Agreement by Dollardex, or otherwise.





On July 15, 2010, the Company and Dollardex agreed to a further amendment of the 2010 Agreement (“Amendment No. 2”).  Pursuant to Amendment No. 2, Dollardex and the Company agreed that its Board of Directors would conduct a “Technology and Business” review of the Company and its products to provide Dollardex with specific information relating to product milestones, budgets and use of funds as well as other business and technical information.  Also pursuant to Amendment No. 2, and in further consideration for the funding to be provided by Dollardex,  the Company agreed to appoint Dollardex as the Company’s independent and exclusive distributor of the Company’s products throughout the world including the United States. The funding specified in the 2010 Agreement will be provided and/or modified in accordance with the Board approved budget referred to in the Amendment No. 2.  The budget was presented to Dollardex on August 23, 2010, as agreed to between the Company and Dollardex.





There is no assurance that the Company will receive the entire amount of funding provided in the 2010 Agreement. To date, the Company had not received any of the licensing fees under this agreement.








Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies





Basis of Presentation





The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CelLynx Group, Inc., and its 100% wholly-owned subsidiary, CelLynx, Inc.  All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.





Cash





Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand and cash in time deposits, certificates of deposit and all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less.





8
 CELLYNX GROUP, INC.
 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
 (unaudited)


Inventory





Inventory consists of finished goods ready for sale and is valued at the lower of cost (determined on a first-in, first-out basis) or market.  The Company reviews its reserves for slow moving and obsolete inventories. As of June 30, 2010, and September 30, 2009, the Company believes that no reserve was necessary.





Accounts Receivable





The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses for accounts receivable. Management reviews the composition of accounts receivable and analyzes historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment patterns to evaluate the adequacy of these reserves.  Reserves are recorded based on the Company’s historical collection history.  Receivables are written off when they are determined to be uncollectible.  As of June 30, 2010, the Company determined that allowance for bad debt was not necessary.





Use of Estimates





The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.





Concentration of Credit Risk





Cash includes deposits in accounts maintained at financial institutions.  Certain financial instruments, which subject the Company to concentration of credit risk, consist of cash. The Company maintains balances at financial institutions which, from time to time, may exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limits for the banks located in the United States. As of June 30, 2010, and September 30, 2009, the Company did not have any deposits in excess of federally-insured limits.  To date, the Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.  For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, one supplier accounted for 100% of the Company’s inventory purchases.





Equipment





Equipment is recorded at historical cost and is depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives.  The useful life and depreciation method are reviewed periodically to ensure that the depreciation method and period are consistent with the anticipated pattern of future economic benefits. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred while renewals and betterments are capitalized. Gains and losses on disposals are included in the results of operations. The useful life of the equipment is being depreciated over three years.





Intangible Assets





Acquired patents, licensing rights and trademarks are capitalized at their acquisition cost or fair value. The legal costs, patent registration fees, and models and drawings required for filing patent applications are capitalized if they relate to commercially viable technologies. Commercially viable technologies are those technologies that are projected to generate future positive cash flows in the near term. Legal costs associated with applications that are not determined to be commercially viable are expensed as incurred. All research and development costs incurred in developing the patentable idea are expensed as incurred. Legal fees from the costs incurred in successful defense to the extent of an evident increase in the value of the patents are capitalized.





9
 CELLYNX GROUP, INC.
 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
 (unaudited)


Capitalized costs for patents are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining twenty-year legal life of each patent after the costs have been incurred. Once each patent or trademark is issued, capitalized costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over a period not to exceed 20 years and 10 years, respectively. The licensing right is amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of 10 years.





Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets





The Company applies the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 360, “Property, Plant, and Equipment,” which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. ASC 360 requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amounts. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the long-lived assets. Loss on long-lived assets to be disposed of is determined in a similar manner, except that fair values are reduced for the cost of disposal. Based on its review, the Company believes that as of June 30, 2010, and September 30, 2009, there was no significant impairment of its long-lived assets.





Revenue Recognition





The Company's revenue recognition policies are in compliance with ASC Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition.”  Revenue is recognized at the date of shipment to customers, and when the price is fixed or determinable, the delivery is completed, no other significant obligations of the Company exist and collectability is reasonably assured.





Fair Value of Financial Instruments





ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments held by the Company.  ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments,” defines fair value, and establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement that enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures.  The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and other current liabilities each qualify as financial instruments and are a reasonable estimate of their fair values because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization and their current market rate of interest.  The carrying amounts of long-term liabilities approximates fair values based on current rates of interest for instruments with similar characteristics.  The three levels of the valuation hierarchy are defined as follows:





·
Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.





·
Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.





·
Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.





10
 CELLYNX GROUP, INC.
 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
 (unaudited)


As of June 30, 2010, and September 30, 2009, the Company did not identify any other assets and liabilities that are required to be presented on the balance sheet at fair value.





Income Taxes





The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes.” ASC 740 requires a company to use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes, whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all of, the deferred tax assets will not be realized.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.





Under ASC 740, a tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded. The adoption had no effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.  Penalties and interest incurred related to underpayment of income tax are classified as income tax expense in the period incurred.  No significant penalties or interest relating to income taxes have been incurred during the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.





Net Loss Per Share





The Company reports loss per share in accordance with the ASC Topic 260, “Earnings Per Share.”  Basic earnings per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.  Diluted earnings per share is based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock warrants were converted or exercised.  Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus the potential dilutive effect of common shares issuable upon exercise or conversion of outstanding stock options and warrants during the period.  Due to the net loss for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, none of the potential dilutive securities have been included in the calculation of dilutive earning per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive.





Stock-Based Compensation





The Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation.”  ASC 718 requires companies to measure compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation at fair value at the grant date and recognize the expense over the employee’s requisite service period. Under ASC 718, the Company’s volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock or the expected volatility of similar companies. The expected life assumption is primarily based on historical exercise patterns and employee post-vesting termination behavior. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.





The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model which was developed for use in estimating the fair value of options. Option-pricing models require the input of highly complex and subjective variables including the expected life of options granted and the Company’s expected stock price volatility over a period equal to or greater than the expected life of the options. Because changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimated value of the Company’s employee stock options, it is management’s opinion that the Black-Scholes option-pricing model may not provide an accurate measure of the fair value of the Company’s employee stock options. Although the fair value of employee stock options is determined in accordance with ASC 718 using an option-pricing model, that value may not be indicative of the fair value observed in a willing buyer/seller market transaction.





11
 CELLYNX GROUP, INC.
 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
 (unaudited)


The Company recognizes in the statement of operations the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees and non-employees.





Recent Accounting Pronouncements





In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) regarding accounting for own-share lending arrangements in contemplation of convertible debt issuance or other financing.  This ASU requires that at the date of issuance of the shares in a share-lending arrangement entered into in contemplation of a convertible debt offering or other financing, the shares issued shall be measured at fair value and be recognized as an issuance cost, with an offset to additional paid-in capital. Further, loaned shares are excluded from basic and diluted earnings per share unless default of the share-lending arrangement occurs, at which time the loaned shares would be included in the basic and diluted earnings-per-share calculation.  This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2009, and interim periods within those fiscal years for arrangements outstanding as of the beginning of those fiscal years. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.





In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic 820 “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.”  This ASU requires certain new disclosures and clarifies existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurement as set forth in Codification Subtopic 820-10. The FASB’s objective is to improve these disclosures and, thus, increase the transparency in financial reporting.  This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2009, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


On February 25, 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09 Subsequent Events Topic 855 “Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements,” effective immediately. The amendments in the ASU remove the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements. Revised financial statements include financial statements revised as a result of either correction of an error or retrospective application of U.S. GAAP. The FASB believes these amendments remove potential conflicts with the SEC’s literature. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.





On March 5, 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-11 Derivatives and Hedging Topic 815 “Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives.” This ASU clarifies the guidance within the derivative literature that exempts certain credit related features from analysis as potential embedded derivatives requiring separate accounting. The ASU specifies that an embedded credit derivative feature related to the transfer of credit risk that is only in the form of subordination of one financial instrument to another is not subject to bifurcation from a host contract under ASC 815-15-25, “Derivatives and Hedging — Embedded Derivatives — Recognition.” All other embedded credit derivative features should be analyzed to determine whether their economic characteristics and risks are “clearly and closely related” to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract and whether bifurcation is required. The ASU will be effective for the Company on July 1, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this ASU will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.





In April 2010, the FASB codified the consensus reached in Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 08-09, “Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition.” FASB ASU No. 2010-17 “Revenue Recognition – Milestone Method (Topic 605)” provides guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research and development transactions. FASB ASU No. 2010 – 17 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, and is effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved after the adoption date. The Company does not expect this ASU will have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations when it adopts this update on October 1, 2010.





12
 CELLYNX GROUP, INC.
 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
 (unaudited)


In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-13, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades,” or ASU 2010-13. This ASU provides amendments to Topic 718 to clarify that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity’s equity securities trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-17 to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.





Note 3 - Equipment





Equipment consisted of the following at June 30, 2010, and September 30, 2009:





June 30,


September 30,2010


2009(unaudited)Office furniture and equipment

$
9,879


$
9,879Computer equipment


8,930



8,93018,809



18,809Accumulated depreciation


(11,394
)


(7,450
)Equipment, net

$
7,415


$
11,359





The Company recorded depreciation expense of $1,316 and $3,945 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010.  The Company recorded depreciation expense of $1,314 and $3,633 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009.





13
 CELLYNX GROUP, INC.
 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
 (unaudited)


Note 4 – Intangible Assets





The Company incurred legal costs in acquiring patent and trademark rights. These costs are projected to generate future positive cash flows in the near term and have been capitalized to intangible assets in the period incurred.





Intangible assets consist of the following:





June 30,


September 30,2010


2009(unaudited)Patents

$
101,589


$
78,724Trademarks


12,487



12,487Licensing right


8,429



8,429122,505



99,640Accumulated Amortization


(4,007
)


(2,460
)Intangibles, net

$
118,498


$
97,180





The Company recorded amortization expense related to the trademarks of $304 and $914, for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.  The Company recorded amortization expense related to the trademarks of $515, and $1,335, for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.





No amortization has been recorded for the patents as of June 30, 2010, as the patents have not been issued to the Company.





The following table summarizes the amortization for the above intangible assets over the next 5 years and thereafter:





Years ended June 30,

Amount2011

$
1,2492012


1,2492013


1,2492014


1,2492015


1,249Thereafter


3,500$
9,745





Note 5 – Convertible Promissory Note





Convertible Promissory Note Issued August 15, 2006





On August 15, 2006, the Company issued a secured promissory note (the “August 2006 Note”) for $250,000 to an unrelated entity (the “Holder”).  On November 10, 2007, the August 2006 Note was amended (the “Amended Note”).  At the date of the amendment, the Company was obligated to pay to the Holder $262,356 which represented the principal and accrued interest, and the Holder was entitled to purchase shares of the Company’s securities pursuant to a Warrant to Purchase Common Stock dated August 15, 2006 (“August 2006 Warrant”).  In contemplation of the completion of the reverse merger, the Company and the Holder reached an agreement whereby this Amended Note superseded the August 2006 Note and canceled the August 2006 Warrant.  The principal amount of the Amended Note is $262,356, is unsecured and is convertible into 6,340,029 shares of common stock of the Company and bears interest at 4% per annum, computed on the basis of the actual number of days elapsed and a year of 365 days.  All unpaid principal, together with the accrued but unpaid interest, shall be due and payable upon the earlier of (i) November 9, 2010, at the written request of the Holder to the Company, or (ii) the occurrence of an event of default.  At the date of conversion, the Company determined that the Amended Note had a beneficial conversion feature with a fair value of $767,047. The Company recorded a debt discount of $262,356 and expensed as financing costs the $504,691 of the beneficial conversion feature that exceeded the principal balance.





14
 CELLYNX GROUP, INC.
 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
 (unaudited)


Convertible Promissory Note Issued February 19, 2009





On February 19, 2009, the Company issued to an unrelated third party, (1) an unsecured convertible promissory note (the “February 2009 Note”) for an aggregate principal balance of $75,000 with a conversion price of $0.20 per share, and (2) 37,500 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock.  The interest rate on the February 2009 Note is 4.0% per annum.  The interest was adjusted to 15% retroactive to the issuance date as the February 2009 Note was in default as of May 31, 2009.  On January 12, 2010, the Company settled the principal balance and accrued interest for a cash payment of $25,000 and 765,625 shares of the Company’s common stock.





Convertible Promissory Note Issued March 3, 2009





On March 3, 2009, the Company issued a non-interest bearing unsecured convertible promissory note to an unrelated third party for an aggregate principal balance of $25,000 with a conversion price of $0.20.  On January 12, 2010, the Company settled the principal balance for a cash payment of $12,500 and 156,250 shares of the Company’s common stock.





The Company recorded interest expense relating to the convertible promissory notes of $2,616 and $25,214 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.  The Company recorded interest expense relating to the convertible promissory notes of $3,706 and $9,255 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.





The Company amortized $28,490 and $85,469 of the debt discount for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.  The Company amortized $28,489 and $89,715 of the debt discount for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.





15
 CELLYNX GROUP, INC.
 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
 (unaudited)


The following table summarizes the convertible promissory notes at June 30, 2010, and September 30, 2009:





June 30,


September 30,2010

(unaudited)


2009Issued August 2006,  amended November 2007

$
262,356


$
262,356Less: Debt discount


(41,326
)


(126,795
)221,030



135,561Issued February 19, 2009


-



75,000Issued March 3, 2009


-



25,000$
221,030


$
235,561





Note 6 – Convertible Promissory Note - Stockholders





Stockholder Notes Issued March 27, 2007





On March 27, 2007, the Company issued convertible promissory notes to two stockholders of the Company.  The principal amount of each convertible promissory note was $20,000 for a combined total of $40,000.  The convertible promissory notes bore interest at 4% per annum.  On December 3, 2009, the Company settled the notes and issued a total of 5,063,292 shares of the Company’s stock at $0.0079 per share in accordance with the conversion option.





Stockholder Notes Issued October 25, 2007





On October 25, 2007, the Company issued convertible promissory notes in the amount of $10,000 with a conversion price of $0.0795 to two stockholders.  The combined total for the two convertible promissory notes was $20,000.  The promissory notes bore interest at 4% per annum, computed on the basis of the actual number of days elapsed and a year of 365 days, and was scheduled to mature on October 25, 2009.  On December 3, 2009, the note holders agreed to extend the maturity date until such time as the Company had sufficient cash to repay these notes.   These notes were fully repaid in April 2010.





The Company recorded interest expense related to the notes of $0 and $605 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.  The Company recorded interest expense related to the notes of $597 and $1,796 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.





16
 CELLYNX GROUP, INC.
 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
 (unaudited)


The following table summarizes the stockholder convertible promissory notes at June 30, 2010, and September 30, 2009:





June 30,


September 30,2010

(unaudited)


2009Issued March 27, 2007

$
-


$
20,000Less: Debt discount


-



(546
)-



19,454Issued March 27, 2007


-



20,000Less: Debt discount


-



(546
)-



19,454Issued October 25, 2007


-



10,000Issued October 25, 2007


-



10,000Issued February 4, 2009


-



43,000$
-


$
101,908





Note 7 - License Agreement





On January 12, 2009, the Company entered into a Licensing Agreement with an unrelated party.  The Licensing Agreement gives the Company the right to manufacture, have manufactured, use, import, and offer to sell, lease, distribute or otherwise exploit certain technology rights and intellectual rights.  The License Agreement has a term of ten years.  As consideration for the License Agreement, the Company issued 57,143 shares of its common stock and paid $1,000 in cash.  The Company determined the fair value of the License Agreement to be $7,429 based on the market value of its common stock on the date of the agreement plus the $1,000, for a total acquisition cost of $8,429, which is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.





The Company recorded amortization expense related to the licensing agreement of $211 and $633 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.  The Company recorded amortization expense related to the licensing agreement of $211 and $422 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.





Note 8 - Consulting Agreement





On March 31, 2009, the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement with an outside third party.  In connection with this Consulting Agreement, the Company issued warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of its Common Stock.  The exercise prices for the warrants are as follows:





Number ofwarrants issued

Exercise Price300,000

$0.10 per share500,000

$0.15 per share600,000

$0.20 per share600,000

$0.25 per share2,000,000


17
 CELLYNX GROUP, INC.
 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
 (unaudited)








The vesting schedule is as follows:





Number of Warrants Issued

Exercise Price

Vesting Dates300,000

$0.10 per share

Immediately500,000

$0.15 per share

Immediately50,000

$0.20 per share

Immediately550,000

$0.20 per share

At time of extension600,000

$0.25 per share

March 31, 20102,000,000





On March 31, 2009, the date of issuance, the fair value of the 850,000 vested warrants was $88,037.  The fair value was computed using the Black-Scholes option pricing model under the following assumptions: (1) expected life of 3 years; (2) volatility of 110%; (3) risk free interest of 2.22% and (4) dividend rate of 0%.  The Company recorded $88,037 as consulting expense on the consolidated financial statements.





At March 31, 2010, the Company determined the fair value of the 600,000 warrants vesting on that date to be $60,318.  The fair value was computed using the Black-Scholes option pricing model under the following assumptions: (1) expected life of 2.00 years; (2) volatility of 145%; (3) risk free interest of 1.40% and (4) dividend rate of 0%.  The shares vest 12 months after the execution of the consulting agreement; therefore, the Company amortized the total fair market value of $60,318 over the vesting period of one year.  As of June 30, 2010, the fair value of the warrants was fully expensed.





The remaining 550,000 warrants will vest at the time of extension of the Consulting Agreement.  The Company will compute the fair value of these warrants at that time.





On January 15, 2010, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Seahawk Capital Partners, Inc.  The Company issued 1,000,000 shares of Company restricted stock and 2,000,000 warrants upon signing of agreement.  In addition, the Company agreed to issue an additional 50,000 shares of restricted Company stock.





The exercise prices of the warrants are as follows:





Number of

Warrants Issued

Exercise Price285,714

$0.40 per share285,714

$0.75 per share285,714

$1.50 per share285,714

$2.00 per share285,714

$3.00 per share285,714

$3.50 per share285,716

$4.00 per share2,000,000


18
 CELLYNX GROUP, INC.
 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
 (unaudited)


The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, resulting in a fair market value of $297,114 and vested immediately.  The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model at the dates the funds were received are as follows: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 145%, (3) risk-free interest rate of 2.44%, and (4) expected life of 5 years.  The Company had expensed $297,114 related to these warrants in January 2010, as the warrants were exercisable upon signing of the agreement.





Note 9 – Stockholders’ Equity





On November 9, 2009, the Company issued 108,000 warrants valued at $13,770 for consulting services.





On January 15, 2010, the Company issued 2 million warrants valued at $297,114.





On February 10, 2010, the Company issued 190,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to unrelated parties in connection with an agreement entered into on June 30, 2009, to provide the Company capital introduction services.  The Company agreed to pay 3.33 shares of common stock for every dollar raised.





On March 10, 2010, the Company issued 2.5 million shares of common stock for a one year consulting agreement with an unrelated party.  As additional compensation, the Company issued 2.5 million warrants with an exercise price of $0.001 which may only be exercised after June 9, 2010, and subject to the terms and conditions of the warrant agreement.  To date, the warrants have not been exercised.





On March 31, 2010, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with an unrelated party and issued 980,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for $0.10 per share with 980,000 detachable warrants.  The warrants have an exercise price of $0.25 and expire on March 18, 2013.





During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 1,945,486 shares of common stock for consulting services.





During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company had issued 6,290,792 shares of common stock as part of the conversion of convertible notes settled during the period.





During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for $0.10 per share with 2,000,000 detachable warrants in connection with subscription agreements.  The warrants have an exercise price of $0.10 and expire on April 1, 2012.





During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 11,516,757 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for $0.06 per share with 11,516,757 detachable warrants in connection with subscription agreements.  The warrants have an exercise price of $0.20 and expire on December 1, 2012.





During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company entered into subscription agreements and issued 8,500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for $0.06 per share with 8,500,000 detachable warrants in connection with subscription agreements.  The warrants have an exercise price of $0.20 and expire on December 31, 2012.





On April 12, 2010, the Company entered into subscription agreements and issued 450,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for $0.10 per share with 450,000 detachable warrants in connection with subscription agreements.  The warrants have an exercise price of $0.25 and expire on April 12, 2013.





19
 CELLYNX GROUP, INC.
 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
 (unaudited)


Stock Options





On December 3, 2007, the Board of Directors adopted the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) of CelLynx, Inc.  All of the Company’s employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors are eligible to be granted options, restricted stock awards, or other stock-based awards under the Plan.  The Plan is administered by the Board.  The Board has authority to grant awards and to adopt, amend and repeal such administrative rules, guidelines and practices relating to the Plan as it shall deem advisable.  Subject to certain adjustments, awards may be made under the Plan for up to 25,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company.  The Board shall establish the exercise price at the time each option is granted.  In July 2008, the Company amended the Plan to increase the number of awards available under the Plan from 25,000,000 to 75,000,000.





The following table summarizes information with respect to options outstanding under the Plan and outside the Plan.





Number of


Weighted Average

Weighted Average


AggregateShares


Exercise Price

Contractual Life


Intrinsic ValueOutstanding at September 30, 2008


53,901,863


$
0.072Granted


9,546,081


$
0.158Canceled


(35,734,111
)

$
0.074Exercised


-Outstanding at September 30, 2009


27,713,833


$
0.102Granted


7,874,217


$
0.128Canceled


(2,400,000
)

$
0.170Exercised


-Outstanding at June 30, 2010 (unaudited)


33,188,050


$
0.103

3.54

$
35,851Exercisable at June 30, 2010 (unaudited)


17,931,335


$
0.087

3.16

$
35,851





Warrants





On November 9, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with Seahawk Capital Partners, Inc. (“Seahawk”), for Seahawk to provide the Company capital introduction services, as well as strategic alliance services.  The Company agreed to pay 8% in cash fees for capital introduced by Seahawk and a number of warrants based on the cash fee amount at $0.10.  As of June 30, 2010, the Company paid a cash fee of $10,800 and issued 108,000 warrants.





The Company determined the fair value of the 108,000 warrants to be $13,770.  The fair value was computed using the Black-Scholes option pricing model under the following assumptions: (1) expected life of 3 years; (2) volatility of 110%; (3) risk free interest of 1.40% and (4) dividend rate of 0%.  The shares vest immediately and have an exercise price of $0.10.





On January 15, 2010, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Seahawk.  The Company issued 1,000,000 shares of Company restricted stock and 2,000,000 warrants upon signing of agreement.  In addition, the Company agreed to issue an additional 50,000 shares of restricted Company stock. (See note 8.)


20
 CELLYNX GROUP, INC.
 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
 (unaudited)





On March 10, 2010, in connection with a one year consulting agreement with an unrelated party, the Company issued 2,500,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.001 which may only be exercised after June 9, 2010 and subject to the terms and conditions of the warrant agreement.   To date, the warrants have not been exercised





On March 31, 2010, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with an unrelated party and issued 980,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for $0.10 per share with 980,000 detachable warrants.  The warrants have an exercise price of $0.25 and expire on March 18, 2013.





On April 12, 2010, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with an unrelated party and issued 450,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for $0.10 per share with 450,000 detachable warrants.  The warrants have an exercise price of $0.25 and expire on April 12, 2013.





During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for $0.10 per share with 2,000,000 detachable warrants.  The warrants have an exercise price of $0.10 and expire on April 1, 2012.





During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 11,516,757 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for $0.06 per share with 11,516,757 detachable warrants.  The warrants have an exercise price of $0.20 and expire on December 1, 2012.





During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company entered into subscription agreements and issued 8,950,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for $0.06 per share with 8,950,000 detachable warrants.  The warrants have an exercise price of $0.20 and expire on December 31, 2012.





The following table summarizes the warrant activity:





Weighted


Average


AggregateAverage


Remaining


IntrinsicNumber of


Exercise


Contractual


ValueWarrants


Price


Life (in years)


(000)Outstanding, September 30, 2009


8,060,000


$
0.12



1.76



-Granted


28,054,757



0.32



2.62



97,500Exercised


-



-Expired


-



-Outstanding, June 30, 2010 (unaudited)


36,114,757


$
0.27



2.43


$
97,500Exercisable, June 30, 2010 (unaudited)


36,114,757


$
0.27



2.43


$
97,500





Note 10 - Commitments and Contingencies





Operating Leases





On March 5, 2010, the Company entered into an amended agreement to a lease dated February 21, 2008.  The lease was renewed for two years and requires monthly payments of $1,962 commencing April 1, 2010 with a 4% increase of the base rent beginning on month thirteen, terminating on March 31, 2012, for office space for its El Dorado Hills, California, office.





21
 CELLYNX GROUP, INC.
 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
 (unaudited)


On December 31, 2009, the Company entered into an amended agreement to a lease dated August 26, 2008.  The lease was renewed for 25 months and requires monthly payments of $3,710 commencing on May 1, 2010 with a $106 increase of the base rent beginning on the fourteenth month, terminating on April 30, 2012, for office space for its Mission Viejo, California, office.





The Company recorded rent expense of $15,055 and $56,187 for three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.  The Company recorded rent expense of $13,724 and $57,325 for three and nine months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.





Litigation





The Company is subject to various legal matters in the ordinary course of business.  After taking into consideration the Company’s legal counsels’ evaluation of these matters, the Company has determined that the resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.





Note 11 – Subsequent Events





Changes in Board and Management





As previously disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 21, 2010, on July 15, 2010, at a meeting of the Company’s Board of Directors, Donald A. Wright resigned as Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors.  At the time of his resignation, Mr. Wright was also serving as Chairman of the Company’s Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee.





Additionally, Tareq Risheq resigned as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors.  At the time of his resignation, Mr. Risheq was serving as members of the following committees of the Company’s Board: Audit Committee and Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee.





In connection with Mr. Wright’s resignation from the Board, the Board appointed Malcolm P. Burke to the Board of Directors.  The Board will determine to which committees, if any, Mr. Burke will be appointed.





Mr. Burke brings a wealth of both business and financial experience to the Company.  Prior to founding Primary Capital Group in 1986, Mr. Burke was a senior advisor and shareholder in Royal LePage Realty, Canada’s largest real estate brokerage firm where he managed the firm’s investment division.  Upon founding the Primary Capital Group, he continued to provide private equity and strategic financial advice to promising early stage and high growth ventures in the natural resource, oil and gas and technology fields.  In the process, he has been responsible for raising capital for private and public companies including many early stage and start up companies. He has been the President and Director of Primary Capital Group since 1988 and has also served as a director of a number of public companies listed on the TSX, NASDAQ and American Stock Exchange and the AIM Market in the UK.  Mr. Burke is a resident of West Vancouver, BC, and is 66 years of age.





Following Mr. Burke’s appointment to the Board, the Board appointed Norman W. Collins as the Chairman of the Board.  Mr. Collins has served as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors since July 2008.





Additionally at the meeting, Daniel Ash relinquished the position of CEO of the Company.  Following his removal as CEO, Mr. Ash resigned as a director of the Company.  Mr. Ash has served as the Company’s CEO and as a director of the Company since July 2008.   It is the Company’s understanding that Mr. Ash resigned from the Board because he felt (i) that it was inappropriate for a majority of directors to seek to appoint a new director without delaying the vote in order to allow him time to investigate the background and qualifications of the proposed new director, (ii) that Messrs. Collins, Yaretz and Burke we representing the interests of Dollardex, Inc. rather than the interests of all shareholders, which those directors expressly deny, and (iii) that he was removed  as CEO of the Company contrary to a December 2009 resolution of the Board, which the Company expressly denies.  A copy of a letter from Mr. Ash setting forth his views was filed as an exhibit to the Current Report.





22
 CELLYNX GROUP, INC.
 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
 (unaudited)


The Board also appointed Mr. Collins to be the interim CEO of the Company.  The Company will disclose the terms of Mr. Collins’s compensation arrangements as CEO once they have been finalized.





The Board also appointed a committee to begin a search for a new CEO.  The members of the Committee are Dwayne Yaretz and Norman Collins.








Asher Enterprises Transaction





As previously reported in a Current Report filed with the Commission on August 5, 2010, on July 22, 2010, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) with Asher Enterprises, Inc. a Delaware corporation (“Asher”), in connection with the purchase by Asher of a Convertible Promissory Note (the “Note”).  The Company received the proceeds of the sale on July 30, 2010.





Pursuant to the Note, Asher loaned to the Company the principal amount of $50,000.  The Note bears interest at a rate of 8%, and is due on April 21, 2011 (the “Due Date”).   Asher may convert principal and unpaid interest on the note into shares of the Company’s common stock, with the number of shares issuable determined by dividing the amount to be converted by the conversion price (the “Conversion Price”) which is equal to 63% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the Company’s common stock over the ten trading days prior to the date of the conversion.  Asher is prohibited under the Note from converting amounts if principal and interest that would result in Asher receiving shares, which when combined with shares of the Company’s common stock held by Asher, would result in Asher holding more than 4.99% of the Company’s then-outstanding common stock.  No registration rights were granted in connection with the purchase of the Note, and the shares of common stock, if any, issued upon conversion, will be restricted securities as defined pursuant to the terms of Rule 144.





Pursuant to the terms of the Note, while there remains any unpaid amounts owing on the Note, the Company may not incur additional debt without Asher’s approval except for (i) debt that was owed or committed as of the date of the SPA and of which the Company had informed Asher; (ii) indebtedness to trade creditors or financial institutions in the ordinary course of business; (c) debt which in the aggregate does not exceed $250,000; or (d) debt the proceeds of which are used to repay the Note.





The Company has the right to pre-pay the Note during the first 120 days following the date of the Note by paying to Asher 150% of the then-outstanding principal amount and any accrued and unpaid interest, penalties, or other amounts owing.





Pursuant to the SPA, the Company agreed to grant to Asher a right of first refusal for any subsequent transactions occurring during the twelve month period following the Closing Date, which was July 21, 2010.  The right of first refusal does not apply to any transactions in excess of $250,000, or to any future transactions between the Company and Dollardex Corp.





In the above transaction, the Note was issued to an accredited investor pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the  Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and rules promulgated pursuant thereto.  Additionally, the underlying shares of common stock, if any, issued upon conversion of the Note will be issued pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the  Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and rules promulgated pursuant thereto.  All certificates for such shares will contain the appropriate legends restricting their transferability absent registration or applicable exemption.  The accredited investor received information concerning the Company and had the ability to ask questions about the Company.





23
 CELLYNX GROUP, INC.
 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
 (unaudited)


These descriptions of the SPA and the Note are not complete, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the SPA and the Note themselves, which were included as exhibits to the Current Report filed with the Commission.





Dollardex Agreement





On July 15, 2010 the Company and Dollardex agreed to a further amendment of the 2010 Agreement (“Amendment No. 2”).  Pursuant to Amendment No. 2, Dollardex and the Company agreed that its Board of Directors would conduct a “Technology and Business” review of the Company and its products to provide Dollardex with specific information relating to product milestones, budgets and use of funds as well as other business and technical information.  Also pursuant to Amendment No. 2, and in further consideration for the funding to be provided by Dollardex,  the Company agreed to appoint Dollardex as the Company’s independent and exclusive distributor of the Company’s products throughout the world including the United States. The funding specified in the 2010 Agreement will be provided and/or modified in accordance with the Board approved budget referred to in the Amendment No. 2.  The budget was presented to Dollardex on August 23, 2010, as agreed to between the Company and Dollardex.  To date, the Company had not received any of the licensing fees under this agreement.





Litigation





Dolphinshire L.P., v. CelLynx Group, Inc., and Does 1-10, Superior Court of California, Orange County, Case No. 00388787.  On July 12, 2010, plaintiff brought suit against the Company for unlawful detainer pursuant to a lease agreement, seeking an unspecified amount of damages not to exceed $25,000.  The Company has not made rent payments in accordance with the lease agreement.  The Company has engaged in settlement negotiations with the plaintiff.




The Company is aware of formal as well as informal claims for back wages made by several former employees and expects to satisfy those claims in the normal course of business.


24





ITEM 2.      MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.





Forward Looking Statements





Certain statements in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”), other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements.  We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.





As used in this Form 10-Q, unless the context requires otherwise, “we” or “us” or the “Company” or “CelLynx” means CelLynx Group, Inc., and our subsidiary.





Plan of Operations





Overview





We are a producer of the next generation of cellular network extenders (also known as repeaters or amplifiers) for the small office, home office (SOHO) and vehicle markets.  This next generation product line, CelLynx 5BARzTM , uses our patent-pending technology to create a single-piece, plug ‘n play unit that strengthens weak cellular signals to deliver higher quality signals for voice, data and video reception on cell phones and other cellular devices being used indoors or in vehicles.





Our first product, The Road Warrior, has passed FCC Certification, and in July 2009, we ordered 220 units from our manufacturer in the Philippines.  We used some of the units as demo units and started selling the remainder.  Due to cash flow issues, we only recently placed an order for an additional 1,000 units and have received all units as of June 30, 2010.





We have recently completed a prototype SOHO Unit which delivers 70 decibel (dB) of gain in a Single Band PCS environment providing up to 2,500 square feet of indoor coverage.  We plan to commercialize this technology, with production and distribution scheduled to begin, in the first calendar quarter of 2011. This unit measures 6.5 X 7.5 X 2.5 inches, weighs approximately one pound and does not require the installation of antennas or cables in order to function.  Most SOHO cellular network extenders currently on the market require a receiving tower or antenna, usually placed in an attic or on a rooftop, and a transmitting tower or antenna to be placed at least 35 feet from the other antenna with each connected to the amplifier by cable.  Our patent pending technology is designed to eliminate the need to distance the receiving and transmitting towers, allowing the two towers to be placed directly inside the amplifier, resulting in a more affordable, one-piece unit sometimes referred to as ‘plug ‘n play’, i.e., requiring no installation other than plugging the unit into a power source. In order to optimize marketability, we are developing an improved model which is expected to operate in a dual band, PCS and Cellular, environment delivering 65 dB of gain, thereby allowing for coverage of 2,500 to 3,000 square feet.  This dual-band unit would work with all current wireless carriers except Nextel which operates on its own frequency. The PCS network is generally used by the older carriers such as AT&T at 850MHz, while the newer carriers such as T-Mobile operate on the cellular network at 1900 MHz.  Management believes that all of the critical functions required for this dual-band unit have been identified and that we have the capability to complete development leading to commercialization.





25


Our product line is being manufactured by contract manufacturers located in the Philippines, with whom CelLynx has established manufacturing and supply chain relationships.   These manufacturers allow us to capitalize on the full advantages of multiple manufacturing locations with a trained and experienced technical work force, state-of-the-art facilities and knowledge of all aspects of supply chain management, operational execution, global logistics and reverse logistics. The marketing and sales functions will be handled in-house, incorporating a multi-channel strategy that includes distribution partners, wireless service providers, retail outlets and international joint ventures.





On October 9, 2009, we signed an agreement with Ingram Micro Inc. to distribute the line of cellular network extenders.  This agreement accelerates CelLynx Group’s go-to-market channel strategy and expands the reach of its product distribution to include all 50 states, D.C., U.S. Territories & Possessions, as well as Military Bases and U.S. embassies abroad.  Ingram Micro Inc. is the world’s largest technology distributor and a leading technology sales, marketing and logistics company.  It offers a broad array of solutions and services to more than 170,000 resellers by distributing and marketing hundreds of thousands of IT products worldwide from more than 1,500 vendors.  We expect to distribute our product through online distributors and traditional retailers.




Dollardex Corp. Agreements





On July 22, 2008, CelLynx entered into a Master Global Marketing and Distribution Agreement (the “Distribution Agreement”) with Dollardex Group Corp., a company organized under the laws of Panama (“Dollardex”), whereby Dollardex agreed to act as CelLynx’s exclusive distributor of CelLynx’s products and related accessories in the following regions: Canada, South America, Europe, Middle East, China, India, Australia, Africa and South East Asia.





Subsequently, on April 29, 2010, we entered into a new master global marketing and distribution agreement (the “2010 Agreement”) that amended the prior agreement dated July 22, 2008 with Dollardex.  Under the 2010 Agreement, Dollardex proposed to establish a distribution network of our line of products in the territories, as defined, as well as to assist the international dealers in the promotion and marketing of our products.  As consideration for exclusive licenses, the Company would receive an aggregate of $11 million, payable to the Company from May 2010 to April 2011.  The funding is subject to terms and condition, as set forth in the 2010 Agreement.  Both parties can terminate the agreement in the event of breach or default and subject to certain conditions allowing for a cure of default.





On June 14, 2010, the Company and Dollardex entered into Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the 2010 Agreement.  Pursuant to Amendment No. 1, the Company and Dollardex agreed to grant an additional termination right to the Company.  In addition to those rights listed in the original 2010 Agreement, the Company and Dolladex agreed that in the event that Dollardex failed to provide by July 10, 2010, the payments required to be provided by May 31, 2010 (the “May Payment”), and July 1, 2010 (the “July Payment”), as originally provided in the 2010 Agreement, the Company would have the right to immediately terminate the 2010 Agreement.  The Company and Dollardex also agreed that if Dollardex made the May and July Payments due by the revised payment date of July 10, 2010, all other payment dates listed in the 2010 Agreement would be extended automatically by 30 days.





Additionally, in Amendment No. 1, the Company and Dollardex agreed that nothing contained in the Amendment would be deemed to affect or be construed to affect any of the terms or provisions of the 2010 Agreement nor impair the validity or enforceability thereof or any rights or powers which the Company now or hereafter may have under or by virtue of the 2010 Agreement in case of any default or non-fulfillment of the terms of the 2010 Agreement by Dollardex, or otherwise.





On July 15, 2010 the Company and Dollardex agreed to a further amendment of the 2010 Agreement (“Amendment No. 2”).  Pursuant to Amendment No. 2, Dollardex and the Company agreed that its Board of Directors would conduct a “Technology and Business” review of the Company and its products to provide Dollardex with specific information relating to product milestones, budgets and use of funds as well as other business and technical information.  Also pursuant to Amendment No. 2, and in further consideration for the funding to be provided by Dollardex,  the Company agreed to appoint Dollardex as the Company’s independent and exclusive distributor of the Company’s products throughout the world including the United States. The funding specified in the 2010 Agreement will be provided and/or modified in accordance with the Board approved budget referred to in the Amendment No. 2.  The budget was presented to Dollardex on August 23, 2010.





There is no assurance that the Company will receive the entire amount of funding provided in the 2010 Agreement. To date, the Company had not received any of the licensing fees under this agreement.






26





Changes in Board and Management





As previously disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 21, 2010, on July 15, 2010, at a meeting of the Company’s Board of Directors, Donald A. Wright resigned as Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors.  At the time of his resignation, Mr. Wright was also serving as Chairman of the Company’s Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee.





Additionally, Tareq Risheq resigned as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors.  At the time of his resignation, Mr. Risheq was serving as members of the following committees of the Company’s Board: Audit Committee and Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee.





In connection with Mr. Wright’s resignation from the Board, the Board appointed Malcolm P. Burke to the Board of Directors.  The Board will determine to which committees, if any, Mr. Burke will be appointed.





Mr. Burke brings a wealth of both business and financial experience to the Company.  Prior to founding Primary Capital Group in 1986, Mr. Burke was a senior advisor and shareholder in Royal LePage Realty, Canada’s largest real estate brokerage firm where he managed the firm’s investment division.  Upon founding the Primary Capital Group, he continued to provide private equity and strategic financial advice to promising early stage and high growth ventures in the natural resource, oil and gas and technology fields.  In the process, he has been responsible for raising capital for private and public companies including many early stage and start up companies. He has been the President and Director of Primary Capital Group since 1988 and has also served as a director of a number of public companies listed on the TSX, NASDAQ and American Stock Exchange and the AIM Market in the UK.  Mr. Burke is a resident of West Vancouver, BC, and is 66 years of age.





Following Mr. Burke’s appointment to the Board, the Board appointed Norman W. Collins as the Chairman of the Board.  Mr. Collins has served as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors since July 2008.





Additionally at the meeting, Daniel Ash relinquished the position of CEO of the Company.  Following his removal as CEO, Mr. Ash resigned as a director of the Company.  Mr. Ash has served as the Company’s CEO and as a director of the Company since July 2008.   It is the Company’s understanding that Mr. Ash resigned from the Board because he felt (i) that it was inappropriate for a majority of directors to seek to appoint a new director without delaying the vote in order to allow him time to investigate the background and qualifications of the proposed new director, (ii) that Messrs. Collins, Yaretz and Burke we representing the interests of Dollardex, Inc. rather than the interests of all shareholders, which those directors expressly deny, and (iii) that he was removed  as CEO of the Company contrary to a December 2009 resolution of the Board, which the Company expressly denies.  A copy of a letter from Mr. Ash setting forth his views was filed as an exhibit to the Current Report.





The Board also appointed Mr. Collins to be the interim CEO of the Company.  The Company will disclose the terms of Mr. Collins’s compensation arrangements as CEO once they have been finalized.





The Board also appointed a committee to begin a search for a new CEO.  The members of the Committee are Dwayne Yaretz and Norman Collins.




In July 2010, in connection with the changes in the Company's Board and management, the Board undertook a review of the Company's structure and strategic focus, and determined it to be in the best interest of the Company to take certain actions, including suspension of the Company's research and development (R&D) and engineering functions until the completion of the Technology and Business review.  The Company anticipates that the R&D and engineering functions will resume in September 2010, although there can be no guarantee as to the timing of the resumption of such functions. Finally, as noted, Mr. Ash resigned in July 2010 and as noted above, the Board appointed Norman Collins as the Company's Chairman and  Interim Chief Executive Officer.


27


Results of Operations





Comparison of the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009





Three months ended June 30,2010


2009


$ Change


% ChangeREVENUE

$
28,356


$
-


$
28,356



100.0
%COST OF REVENUE


16,717



-



16,717



100.0
%GROSS PROFIT


11,639



-



11,639



100.0
%OPERATING EXPENSES


860,556



1,380,683



(520,127
)


-37.7
%NON OPERATING EXPENSES


30,972



36,841



(5,869
)


-15.9
%NET LOSS

$
(879,889
)

$
(1,417,524
)

$
537,635



-37.9
%





Revenue and Cost of Revenue





During the three months ended June 30, 2010, we generated net $28,356 in revenue that arose from the initial sale of our 5Barz units which became sellable in July 2009.  Cost of revenues was $16,717 resulting in a gross profit of $11,639.  During the same period of 2009, we were in development stage and did not recognize any revenues, cost of revenues, or gross profit.





Operating Expenses





Total operating expenses incurred for the three months ended June 30, 2010, was $860,556 compared to $1,380,683 for the three months ended June 30, 2009, which decreased by $520,127.  The decrease was due to a decrease in share based compensation as consulting costs had decreased offset by an increase in marketing and outside service costs.





Non-Operating Income and Expenses





Total non-operating expenses incurred for the three months ended June 30, 2010, was $30,972 compared to $36,841 for the three months ended June 30, 2009, for a decrease of $5,869.  The decrease was due to the decrease in the interest expense and amortization of debt discounts associated with convertible notes issued.





28


Comparison of the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009





Nine months ended June 30,2010


2009


$ Change


% ChangeREVENUE

$
76,179


$
-


$
76,179



100.0
%COST OF REVENUE


50,557



-



50,557



100.0
%GROSS PROFIT


25,622



-



25,622



100.0
%OPERATING EXPENSES


3,495,635



2,944,009



551,626



18.7
%NON OPERATING EXPENSES


112,870



309,168



(196,298
)


-63.5
%NET LOSS

$
(3,582,883
)

$
(3,253,177
)

$
(329,706
)


10.1
%





Revenue and Cost of Revenue





During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, we generated net $76,179 in revenue that arose from the initial sale of our 5Barz units which became sellable in July 2009.  Cost of revenues was $50,557 resulting in a gross profit of $25,622.  During the same period of 2009, we were in development stage and did not recognize any revenues, cost of revenues, or gross profit.





Operating Expenses





Total operating expenses incurred for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, was $3,495,635 compared to $2,944,009 for the nine months ended June 30, 2009, which increased by $551,626.  The increase was due to a net increase in professional fees and marketing fees of $283,797 to promote our 5Barz product and gain market share.  In addition, there was a beneficial conversion liability that had an increase in value for the nine months ended June 30, 2009, in the amount of $251,410.





Non-Operating Income and Expenses





Total non-operating expenses incurred for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, was $112,870 compared to $309,168 for the nine months ended June 30, 2009, for a decrease of $196,298.  The decrease was due to the change in fair value of the accrued beneficial conversion liability in the amount of $251,410 offset by by the change in fair value of accrued warrant liability in the amount of $419,571.





Liquidity and Capital Resources





Financial Condition





As of June 30, 2010, we had cash of $3,364, and we had a working capital deficit of $1,228,908 compared to cash of $6,776 and a working capital deficit of $1,024,034 as of September 30, 2009.  The increase in working capital deficit is due the increase in current liabilities which is primarily comprised of accounts payable and convertible notes.





During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, cash used in operating activities was $1,408,747.  Cash used in operating activities consisted of a net loss of $3,582,883 offset by non-cash expenses of $441,185 for stock issued for services, $327,087 for warrants issued for services, $851,217 for stock-based compensation, $86,561 for the amortization of debt discount, and an increase of $513,081 for change in accounts payable and accrued expenses.





29


We used $22,865 for the purchase of intangible assets for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $23,055 for the purchase of equipment and intangible assets for the nine months ended June 30, 2009.





Cash provided by financing activities was $1,428,200 for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $521,500 for the nine months ended June 30, 2009.  We received $1,544,450, less offering costs of $33,750 associated with the common stock, for the nine months ended June 30, 2010.  We have financed our operations primarily through proceeds from the issuance and sale of common stock.





We anticipate raising an additional $3 million during the next three months through private equity offerings.  There is no assurance that the Company will be able to raise the entire amount. We believe that our current cash, anticipated cash flows from operations, and net proceeds from the private placement financing will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs, including our cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures.





Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements





Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements





We have not entered into any other financial guarantees or other commitments to guarantee the payment obligations of any third parties. We have not entered into any derivative contracts that are indexed to our shares and classified as stockholder’s equity or that are not reflected in our financial statements.  Furthermore, we do not have any retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity. We do not have any variable interest in any unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit support to us or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us.





Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates





Our management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported net sales and expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.





While our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, we believe that the following accounting policies are the most critical to aid you in fully understanding and evaluating this management discussion and analysis.





Intangible Assets





Acquired patents, licensing rights and trademarks are capitalized at their acquisition cost or fair value. The legal costs, patent registration fees, and models and drawings required for filing patent applications are capitalized if they relate to commercially viable technologies. Commercially viable technologies are those technologies that are projected to generate future positive cash flows in the near term. Legal costs associated with applications that are not determined to be commercially viable are expensed as incurred. All research and development costs incurred in developing the patentable idea are expensed as incurred. Legal fees from the costs incurred in successful defense to the extent of an evident increase in the value of the patents are capitalized.





30


Capitalized costs for patents are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining twenty-year legal life of each patent after the costs have been incurred. Once each patent or trademark is issued, capitalized costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over a period not to exceed 20 years and 10 years, respectively.  The licensing right is amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of 10 years.





Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets





The Company applies the provisions of ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant, and Equipment,” which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. ASC 360 requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amounts. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the long-lived assets. Loss on long-lived assets to be disposed of is determined in a similar manner, except that fair values are reduced for the cost of disposal. Based on its review, the Company believes that as of June 30, 2010, and September 30, 2009, there was no significant impairment of its long-lived assets.





Revenue Recognition





The Company's revenue recognition policies are in compliance with ASC Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition.”  Revenue is recognized at the date of shipment to customers, and when the price is fixed or determinable, the delivery is completed, no other significant obligations of the Company exist and collectability is reasonably assured.





Income Taxes





The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes.” ASC 740 requires a company to use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes, whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all of, the deferred tax assets will not be realized.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.





Under ASC 740, a tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded.  Penalties and interest incurred relate to underpayment of income tax are classified as income tax expense in the period incurred.  No significant penalties or interest relating to income taxes have been incurred during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.





Stock Based Compensation





The Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation.”  ASC 718 requires companies to measure compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation at fair value at the grant date and recognize the expense over the employee’s requisite service period. Under ASC 718, the Company’s volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock or the expected volatility of similar companies. The expected life assumption is primarily based on historical exercise patterns and employee post-vesting termination behavior. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.





31


ITEM 3.     QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK





Not Applicable.





ITEM 4.     CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.





Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures





Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") require public companies to maintain "disclosure controls and procedures," which are defined to mean a company's controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms. Our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and a consultant providing services commonly provided by a Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on those evaluations, as of the Evaluation Date, our CEO and CFO believe that:





(i) our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure; and





(ii) our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective.





Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting





There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.





PART II - OTHER INFORMATION





ITEM 1.      LEGAL PROCEEDINGS





Except for the matter listed below, we know of no material, existing or pending legal proceedings against us, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation. There are no proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial stockholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our company.





Dolphinshire L.P., v. CelLynx Group, Inc., and Does 1-10, Superior Court of California, Orange County, Case No. 00388787.  On July 12, 2010, plaintiff brought suit against the Company for unlawful detainer pursuant to a lease agreement, seeking an unspecified amount of damages not to exceed $25,000.  The Company has engaged in settlement negotiations with the plaintiff.




The Company is aware of formal as well as informal claims for back wages made by several former employees and expects to satisfy those claims in the normal course of business.


32


ITEM 2.UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS





On April 12, 2010, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with an unrelated party and issued 450,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for $0.10 per share with 450,000 detachable warrants.  The warrants have an exercise price of $0.25 and expire on April 12, 2013.





In each issuance discussed above, the shares of common stock were issued without registration under the 1933 Act in reliance on Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.





ITEM 3.DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES





None.





ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)





ITEM 5.OTHER INFORMATION





(a)
None.





(b)
There were no changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our board of directors.





ITEM 6.EXHIBITS


EXHIBIT INDEX





ExhibitNumber

Description10.1

Amendment No. 1 to Master Global Marketing and Distribution Agreement (previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report filed with the Commission on June 15, 2010)10.2

Securities Purchase Agreement (previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report filed with the Commission on August 5, 2010)10.3

Convertible Promissory Note (previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report filed with the Commission on August 5, 2010)10.4

Amendment No. 2 to Dollardex Agreement*31.1

Section 302 Certification by the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer *31.2

Section 302 Certification by the Corporation’s Chief Financial Officer *32.1

Section 906 Certification by the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer *32.2

Section 906 Certification by the Corporation’s Chief Financial Officer *


__________________


* Filed Herewith.





33





SIGNATURES
 
 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 CELLYNX GROUP, INC.(Registrant)Date: August 23, 2010
By:
/s/ Norman CollinsNorman CollinsChief Executive Officer