alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### $1, 500

$2, 000 $2, 500 $3, 000 $3, 500**M a** **n u** **f a** **c t** **u r** **e r** **S e** **l l** **i n** **g P** **r i** **c e** **( $** **)**

M6_AlAl_bl_co
M5_AlAl_bl_co
M4_AlAl_bl_co
M3_AlAl_bl_co
M3_AlAl_slm_co
M3_AlAl_dg w_co M3_CuAl_bl_co 

### dEL **0 dEL**  **1 dEL**  **2 dEL**  **3 NE**  **MA Pr** 

**. dEL**  **4 dE**  **L 5**  **dEL 6**  **dEL 7** 

$

- $500 $1, 000

97. 80% 98. 00% 98. 20% 98. 40% 98. 60% 98. 80% 99. 00% 99. 20% 99. 40% 99. 60% 99. 80% 100. 00%**M a** **n u** **f a** **c t** **u r** **e r** **S e** **l l** **i n** **g P** **r i** **c e** **( $** **)**



### Desi **gn Li**  **ne 6**  **Ef fi**  **ci ency**  **at 35%**  **lo ad,**  **T em**  **perature Co**  **rrected** M3_CuAl_bl_co
M3_CuAl_bl_sh
H0_A lA l_bl_c o H0_A lA l_slm _co

ZD MH_AlAl_dg w_c o H0_CuCu_bl_co

SA1 _A lA l_dg w_c o

SA1 _CuCu_dg w_co

CSLs

### $4, 500

$5, 500 $6, 500 $7, 500 $8, 500 $9, 500**M a** **n u** **f a** **c t** **u r** **e r** **S e** **l l** **i n** **g P** **r i** **c e** **( $** **)** M1 2_A lAl_bl_3leg

M1 2_CuA l_bl_3leg
M6 _A lA l_bl_3leg
M6 _A lA l_f m_3leg
M4 _CuA l_f m_3leg
M3 _A lA l_f m_3leg
M3 _A lA l_slm_3leg
M3 _A lA l_dg w_3leg H0_AlAl_f m_3leg H0_AlAl_s lm_3leg
ZD MH _AlAl_dg w_3leg H0_CuCu_f m_ 3leg SA1_AlAl_dg w_5leg SA1_CuCu_dg w_5leg
CSLs 

### dEL **0 dEL**  **1 dEL**  **2 dEL**  **3 dEL**  **4 dEL**  **5 dE**  **L 6**  **dEL 7** 

$500 $1, 500 $2, 500 $3, 500

97. 80% 98. 00% 98. 20% 98. 40% 98. 60% 98. 80% 99. 00% 99. 20% 99. 40% 99. 60% **Desi gn**  **Li ne**  **7 Ef**  **fi ci**  **ency at**  **35% Loa**  **d, Te mp**  **er atu**  **re Co**  **rrected**

### $8, 000

$10, 000 $12, 000 $14, 000 $16, 000 $18, 000**M a** **n u** **f a** **c t** **u r** **e r** **S e** **l l** **i n** **g P** **r i** **c e** **( $** **)** M6 _A lA l_bl_3leg

M6 _A lA l_f m_3leg

M6 _CuCu_f m_ 3leg

M5 _A lA l_bl_3leg

M5 _A lA l_f m_3leg

M4 _CuA l_f m_3leg

M3 _A lA l_f m_3leg

M3 _A lA l_slm_3leg 

### dEL **0 dEL**  **1 dE**  **L 2**  **dEL 3**  **dEL 4**  **dEL 5**  **dEL 6**  **dE L**  **7**

$2, 000 $4, 000 $6, 000

98. 40% 98. 60% 98. 80% 99. 00% 99. 20% 99. 40% 99. 60% 99. 80% 100. 00%**M a** **n u** **f a** **c t** **u r** **e r** **S e** **l l** **i n** **g P** **r i** **c e** **( $** **)**



### Desi **gn Li**  **ne 8**  **Ef fi**  **ci en**  **cy at**  **35%**

**L oad,**  **T em**  **perature Co**  **rrected** M3 _A lA l_slm_3leg

M3 _A lA l_dg w_3leg

M3 _CuA l_f m_3leg
H0_AlAl_f m_3leg
H0_AlAl_s lm_5leg

ZD MH _AlAl_dg w_5leg
H0_CuCu_f m_ 3leg
SA1_AlAl_dg w_5leg

CSLs
SA1_CuCu_dg w_5leg
18 April 2013 *************************

NSN: 8960-01-523-6348 (TPNS) *MONOGRAPH NO: M7J

*************************

Item: 

Beverage bases (Powdered), Sweetened with nutritive sweetener, Tropical punch, 

Fortified with ascorbic acid and enhanced with maltodextrin, Small flat pouch (Type II, 

Flavor 10, Formulation d, Design E)

Document: CID A-A-20098, Beverage Bases (Powdered) and PKG&QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 130 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Dehydrated product: Uniformly blended, free flowing, and a homogenous dry mixture 

free of hard lumps. Granulation may vary from a fine powder to small agglomerated 

crystals.

Rehydrated product: Light red, sediment free, clear to slightly cloudy.

Odor: Rehydrated product: Tropical fruit blend.

Flavor: Rehydrated product: Tropical fruit blend.

Texture: Dehydrated product: Free of hard lumps.

Rehydrated product: Fully dissolve within two minutes with constant stirring.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Rehydrated: Coagulated, jelled, surface frothing, or cloudiness, excessive sediment 

significantly affecting aesthetic appearance or flavor.

Odor: Burnt, scorched, moldy/mildew.

Flavor: Oxidized or any other flavor not typical of the type of beverage.

Texture: Lumpy or caked, not free flowing.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Prepare beverage IAW package instructions. Product should dissolve completely within about two 

minutes.

Special Notes
18 April 2013 *************************

NSN: 8960-01-523-6348 (TPNS) *MONOGRAPH NO: M7J

*************************

If slight sedimentation and clouding are observed but the odor and flavor are normal, do not score the 

sedimentation as a defect during surveillance inspection; make note of it in the narrative for future use. 

Coagulation/gelation may occur if the original formulation was incorrect or if the product has been 

temperature abused for a long time. Coagulation / gelation results in clumps of granules that do not 

readily dissolve when product is reconstituted. Particles tend to float in suspension (look like gel pockets 

or tapioca granules that are clumped together).
No. 10-1399.

#### Dana Roberts, Petitioner v. Sea-Land Services, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 1103, 132 S. Ct. 993,

181 L. Ed. 2d 570,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 9022.

December 30, 2011.

Motion of the Solicitor General for divided argument granted.
MEMORANDUM

DATE: July 28, 2015

TO: C lean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

– 2013

- 0602

FROM: John Bradfield , EPA

SUBJECT: 5/27/15

, AWWA Meeting Regarding Proposed C lea n Power Plan for Existing

Power Plants

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between EPA and the Amer i can Water Works Association on

5/27 / 15 to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

. The Carbon

Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2

, 2014

.

Please see attached list of participants.
No. 11-5929.

#### Bryan G. Leonard, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 925, 132 S. Ct. 357,

181 L. Ed. 2d 225,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6779.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 11/24/14

FROM: Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: Discussion of the Clean Power Plan at a Symposium Organized by the Duke Nicholas 

Institute and the Georgia Institute of Technology

SUMMARY: 

EPA Region 4 and OAP participated in a symposium entitled “Shaping the Southeast’s Energy Future–

Regional Electricity Trends and the EPA’s Clean Power Plan” organized by the Duke Nicholas Institute

and the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, GA, on September 26, 2014. The Clean Power Plan 

for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014. 

ATTENDEES:

EPA

Ken Mitchell/EPA R4

Beverly Banister/EPA R4

Julia Miller/EPA OAP

External Stakeholders

Marilyn Brown/Georgia Tech

Tim Profeta/Duke Nicholas Institute

Gary Brinkworth/TVA

Jeremy Tarr/Duke Nicholas Institute

Dan Matisoff/Georgia Tech

Myra Reece/SC Department of Health and Environmental Control

Paula Cobb/Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Luis Martinez/National Resources Defense Council

Diane Denton/Duke Energy

James McLawhorn/NC Utilities Commission Public Staff

Chuck Eaton/GA PSC

Mandy Mahoney/Southeast Energy Efficiency Alliance

John Morrison/Strata Solar

Jonas Monast/Duke Nicholas Institute

Brian Toth/Southern Company

Franz Litz/Great Plains Institute

Frank Rambo/Southern Environmental Law Center

Approximately 50 additional attendees
No. 11-125.

#### Cynthia Holmes, Petitioner v. East Cooper Community Hospital, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1078,

181 L. Ed. 2d 796,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 496.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 943, 132 S. Ct. 402, 181 L. Ed. 2d 258, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7427.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          17,037
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,302
<ALLOWANCES>                                       532
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,673,913
<DEPRECIATION>                                 288,976
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,646,162
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,534,327
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,951,007
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,646,162
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               143,382
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,511
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,862
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,637
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,637
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,673
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3220 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3220

  To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to allow 
 certain institutions to use geographic preference for procurement of 
                 certain foods, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2019

     Ms. Pingree (for herself, Mr. Fortenberry, and Mr. Harder of 
 California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to allow 
 certain institutions to use geographic preference for procurement of 
                 certain foods, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Kids Eat Local Act''.

SEC. 2. GEOGRAPHIC PREFERENCE AND IDENTIFICATION FOR SCHOOL FOOD.

    Paragraph (3) of section 9(j) of the Richard B. Russell National 
School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(j)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(3) allow institutions receiving funds under this Act and 
        the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1771 et seq.), 
        including the Department of Defense Fresh Fruit and Vegetable 
        Program--
                    ``(A) to use a geographic preference for the 
                procurement of unprocessed agricultural products, both 
                locally grown and locally raised; or
                    ``(B) to use locally grown, locally raised, or 
                locally caught as a product specification.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-5043.

#### Frederick Padgett, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 887, 132 S. Ct. 262,

181 L. Ed. 2d 153,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5470.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 287.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We have issued our report dated March 18, 2019 (except for the effects of discontinued operations, as discussed in Note 22, as to which the date is June 28, 2019), with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of CURO Group Holdings Corp. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019. We consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of CURO Group Holdings Corp. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-230905) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-221945).
 
 /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
 
 Dallas, Texas
 March 9, 2020
* After examining appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would notmaterially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted w ithout oral argument. This Order and Judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. T he court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R . 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### OCT 24 2001 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

EDWARD DWAYNE ASHFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOHN E. HAHN, Warden; R. E. HOLTON, Associate Warden; E. HANSEN, Captain; ROBERT WALKER, S.I.A.; and R. J. ZAMPERELLI, Unit Manager, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-1264 (D.C. No. 01-Z-375) (D. Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before EBEL , KELLY and LUCERO , Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff-appellant Edward D. Ashford challenges th e district court’s dismissal of his complaint based on an alleged viol ation of his right of access to the courts. The complaint alleged that, while Mr. Ashford was incarcerated at a- 2 -

federal prison, his legal papers were seized and he was placed in administrative detention during a prison investigation. The depri vation of his legal papers allegedly caused Mr. Ashford to miss a deadline for filing a second supplemental petition for certiorari with the Maryland Court of Appeals. The district court dismissed the complaint as legally frivolous. Before the district court, Mr. Ashford filed a “Mot ion to Entertain Complaint,” explaining why his exhaustion of the Bu reau of Prisons’ administrative grievance procedure had been rendere d impossible. The district court, relying on Garrett v. Hawk , 127 F.3d 1263, 1267 (10th Cir. 1997), ruled that the motion was unnecessary because the complai nt sought only money damages, which are unavailable through the prison g rievance procedures. Garrett has since been disapproved by the Supreme Court, wh ich held that exhaustion is required, regardless of the relief offered by the a dministrative procedures. Booth v. Churner , 121 S. Ct. 1819, 1825 (2001). Before reaching th e merits, it must be determined whether Mr. Ashford has satisfied the ex haustion requirements. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is VACAT ED and this case is REMANDED for further proceedings not inconsistent w ith this order. Mr. Ashford’s motion to appeal in forma pauperis is GRANTED.
ENTERED FOR THE COURT David M. Ebel Circuit Judge
27 September 2012 *************************

NSN: 8940-01-426-0553 (BRM) *MONOGRAPH NO: M2B*

*************************

Item: Beef Ravioli in Meat Sauce 

Document: PCR-B-021, Beef Ravioli in Meat Sauce, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf Stable 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 300 Component Classification: PRIMARY

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Ravioli: Uniform in size and shape that are intact.

Sauce: Reddish brown and contains identifiable pieces of meat.

Odor: Cooked beef ravioli in a meat sauce flavored with Italian seasonings.

Flavor: Cooked beef ravioli in a meat sauce flavored with Italian seasonings, 

Texture:

Ravioli: Moist and tender.

Sauce: Smooth and moderately thick. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance:

Ravioli: Broken or mushy, darkened, soft or bloated.

Sauce: Pasty or mostly absorbed, darkened; meat in sauce of filling very dark; oil 

separation. 

Odor: Rancid beef, off tomato; low odor of Italian herbs and spices. 

Flavor: Rancid beef, low flavor of Italian herbs and spices, bitter grassy tomato. 

Texture: Ravioli: Extremely soft, tough broken pieces.

Sauce: Pasty, oil separation. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

 

Special Notes

NA
No. 11-6895.

#### Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela, Petitioner v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Department, et al.

565 U.S. 1119, 132 S. Ct. 1011,

181 L. Ed. 2d 748,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 382.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# Box4_Table 2 Avg change RE diff
No. 11-5856.

#### Joseph Lee Holmes, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 936, 132 S. Ct. 389,

181 L. Ed. 2d 244,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6262.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 11-7288.

#### Steven D’Agostino, Petitioner v. Communications-Electronics Command, Research, Development, and Engineering Center, Department of the Army, Fort Monmouth.

565 U.S. 1099, 132 S. Ct. 861,

181 L. Ed. 2d 561,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8925.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 436 Fed. Appx. 70.
No. 11-277.

#### Ohio, Petitioner v. D.B.

565 U.S. 1100, 132 S. Ct. 846,

181 L. Ed. 2d 563,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8866.

December 12, 2011.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris granted. Petition for writ of certio-rari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.

Same case below, 129 Ohio St. 3d 104, 950 N.E.2d 528.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of theglobe.com, inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael S. Egan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 6, 2011
By:
/s/Michael S. EganMichael S. EganChief Executive Officer
### Beverly Eaves Perdue Governor

Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming Regional Administrator USEPA, Region 4 Sam Nunn Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960
Dear Ms. Fleming: Director

August 30, 2012 Dee Freeman Secretary

This letter is to request the conditional approval ofthe Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill area Reasonably Available Control Technology State Implementation Plan (Metrolina RACT SIP) submitted under Section 182(b)(2) ofthe Clean Air Act (CAA). North Carolina submitted the original RACT SIP to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in April2007, followed by a revision in January 2008.
Based on monitoring data, North Carolina is attaining the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) and received a clean data determination for the area on November 15, 2011. However, EPA has identified the need for an adjustment of applicability ofNorth Carolina's Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) RACT rules for all sources addressed by Control Technology Guidelines (CTGs) in areas classified as moderate and above for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Specifically, the EPA is requiring North Carolina to address RACT for sources with VOC emissions less than 100 tons per year. North Carolina is in the process ofrevising its state rules to reflect applicability requirements for these sources. The schedule for the rule revision is as follows:
Draft Rule to Air Quality Committee Request to Proceed to Hearing to EMC Start ofPublic Comment Close ofPublic Comment EMC Adoption Rules Review Commission Approval Effective Date (if 10 or more letters of Objection are not received)

1641 Mall Service Center, Raleigh , North Carolina 27699-1641 217 West Jones Street, Raleigh , NC 27603 Phone: 919-707-8401 I FAX 919-715-0718 I Internet: www
.ncair

.org An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer September 12, 2012 November 8, 2012 December 3, 2012 February 1, 20 13 March 14, 2013 April 18, 2013 May 1, 2013

# N~rthCarolina 

# JVaturalluMs

. Fleming August 30, 2012 Page 2
North Carolina commits to submit revisions to VOC RACT rules within one year ofEPA's conditional approval ofthe Metrolina RACT SIP regarding CAA Section 182(b)(2). Once these revisions are submitted, the requirements of Section 182(b)(2) will be satisfied. If you should have any questions regarding this activity, please contact Joelle Burleson ofmy staffat (919) 707-8720.

SCH/ssm

cc: Michael Abraczinskas Sushma Masemore Laura Boothe Joelle Burleson Scott Davis Lynorae Benjamin Sincerely,

# <t>~C~~ Sheila C. Holman
Exhibit 35.7



|     |  |                                                                                                                        
|---- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Corporate Trust Services 
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road Columbia, MD 21045 
Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380



|Re: | Annual Statement of Compliance for BXP Trust 2017-GM, Commercial Mortgage Pass- Through Certificates, Series 2017-GM
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 9, 2017 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period):

(a) A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such
officers supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted in Schedule A.

February 16, 2018



|               
|---------------
|/s/ BRIAN SMITH
|BRIAN SMITH    
|Vice President 



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO



---

|     |  |                                                                                                                        
|---- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Corporate Trust Services 
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road Columbia, MD 21045 
Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380

Schedule A

Material Instances of Non-Compliance

List of Exemptions for BXP Trust 2017-GM, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017- GM

The July 13, 2017 distribution (the July Distribution), due to holders of certificates of the BXP Trust
2017-GM, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-GM, was made eight days late on July 21, 2017 by Wells Fargo. The inadvertent delay in the
required distribution, consisting of approximately $4.45 million, was because of a human error in the verification of payment data from internal systems. The error resulted in a delay in the release of the payment information to the payment
processing system. The impact of this error was limited to the July Distribution.



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO