alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- Laguna Construction Company, Inc. Under Contract No. FA8903-06-D-8515 APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) ) ASBCA No. 59108

Carolyn Callaway, Esq.

Carolyn Callaway, P.C. Albuquerque, NM APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Col Matthew J. Mulbarger, USAF Air Force ChiefTrial Attorney Capt Christopher M. Kovach, USAF

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL This appeal has been settled, and payment has been made to the contractor. By "Notice ofReceipt ofPayment" dated 16 February 2016, appellant requests that this appeal be dismissed with prejudice. WHEREFORE, ASBCA No. 59108 is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 17 February 2016

# r~A**~N** Administrative Judge Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals**~**

# ..

# _______

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59108, Appeal ofLaguna Construction Company, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals
No. 11-713 (11A520).

#### Rick Perry, Governor of Texas, et al., Appellants v. Shannon Perez, et al. Rick Perry, Governor of Texas, et al., Appellants v. Wendy Davis, et al. Rick Perry, Governor of Texas, et al., Appellants v. Shannon Perez, et al.

No. 11-714 (11A521).

No. 11-715 (11A536).

565 U.S. 1090, 132 S. Ct. 842,

181 L. Ed. 2d 545,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8833.

December 9, 2011.

The applications for stay, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, are granted, and it is ordered that the orders issued by the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas on November 23, 2011, in case Nos. 5:11-CV-360, and 5:11-CV-788, and the order of November 26, 2011, in case No. 5:11-CV-360, are hereby stayed pending further order of the Court. In addition, the applications for stay are treated as jurisdictional statements, and in each case probable jurisdiction is noted. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. The briefs of appellants and appellees, not to exceed 15,000 words, are to be filed simultaneously with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 2 p.m., Wednesday, December 21, 2011. Reply briefs, not to exceed 15,000 words, are to be filed simultaneously with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 2 p.m., Tuesday, January 3, 2012. The cases are set for oral argument on Monday, January 9, 2012, at 1 p.m.

Same cases below, 835 F. Supp. 2d 209 (No. 11-713 (11A520)).
EX 4.75



 Exhibit 4.75 
 Contract No.: L12006028 
  
 Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this exhibit. The copy filed herewith omits the information subject to the confidentiality request. Omissions are designated as ***. A complete
version of this exhibit has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 
 Appendix 1: 

SHANGHAI STOCK EXCHANGE SECURITIES INFORMATION OPERATION LICENSE 

Contract No.: L12006028 
 Entity: Fortune Software (Beijing) Co., Ltd. 
 Address: Floor 9, Tower C, Corporate Square,
No. 35 Financial Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100033, China 
 Legal Representative: Zhiwei Zhao 

Information Licensed to Operate: 
  

	1.	Shanghai Stock Exchange Level-1 Quotes 


Purpose: Transmit to terminal users via internet (www.jrj.com) 
 Territory: Mainland China (excluding Hong Kong, Macau & Taiwan) 
 Valid Term:
January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 
 Date of Issuance: January 2011 

 

			
	
		
	By:	 	Shanghai Stock Exchange
		 	Information Network Co., Ltd.


 *** - indicates material omitted pursuant to a Confidential Treatment Request and filed separately with the
Securities and Exchange Commission 







 Contract No.: L12006028 

 
  
 Appendix 2: 
 PAYMENT OF FEES 

 

	1.	Fees payable by Party B are as follows: 

  

	1.1	Royalty: *** 

  

	1.2	Usage fee: *** 

 Total: *** 

 

	2.	Method of Payment: 

 2.1 Within ten business
days from the date hereof, Party B shall remit the above fees to the bank and account designated by Party A. 
  

	2.2	Designated bank and account by Party A: 

 Bank: China Merchants Bank, Shanghai Branch, Jinqiao Sub-branch 
 Name: Shanghai
Stock Exchange Information Network Co., Ltd. 
 Account No.: 

 

			
	 Party A: Shanghai Stock Exchange Information
                Network Co., Ltd.
	  	Party B: Fortune Software (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
		
	(Signature or Seal) /s/	  	(Signature or Seal) /s/
		
	[COMPANY SEAL]	  	[COMPANY SEAL]
		
	Date of Execution:	  	Date of Execution:

  
 *** - indicates material omitted pursuant to
a Confidential Treatment Request and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission 







 Contract No.: L12006028 

 
  
 Appendix 3: 
 Shanghai Stock Exchange Information Network Co., Ltd. Information
Service Order 
  

									
	 Product/

Service Type
	  	 Product/Service

Name
	 	Description	  	Quantity	  	Select
	 Satellite

System
	  	 Shanghai
 Broadband

Satellite VSAT
	 	 Subscribe by Party B from Shanghai
 Stock Communication Co., Ltd.
	  	One Set	  	Yes
	 Ground

System
	  	INTERNET Transmission	 	Provided by Party A, ***	  	One Set	  	Yes
	  	Dedicated Line Transmission	 	Provided by Party A, ***	  	One Set	  	No
	 Notes:
	  	None

  

			
	Party A: Shanghai Stock Exchange Information	  	Party B: Fortune Software (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
	      Network Co., Ltd.
	  	
		
	(Signature or Seal) /s/	  	(Signature or Seal) /s/
		
	[COMPANY SEAL]	  	[COMPANY SEAL]
		
	Date of Execution:	  	Date of Execution:

  
 *** - indicates material omitted pursuant to
a Confidential Treatment Request and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission
No. 11-7290.

#### Larry Darnell Eason, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1099, 132 S. Ct. 862,

181 L. Ed. 2d 561,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8872.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 446 Fed. Appx. 948.
EXHIBIT 15



Bank One Corporation

1 Bank One Plaza

Chicago, Illinois 60670



|Re: | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as filed on Form 10-Q on May 7, 2004
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



With respect to the subject quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 of the
Securities Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as filed on Form 10-Q on May 7, 2004, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated May 7, 2004, related to our review of interim financial
information.



Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of
1933 (the Act), such report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant, or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



Chicago, Illinois

May 7, 2004



/s/    KPMG LLPKPMG LLP




72
No. 11-6706.

#### Gregory Downs, Petitioner v. Domingo Uribe, Jr., Warden.

565 U.S. 1077, 132 S. Ct. 821,

181 L. Ed. 2d 523,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8689.

December 5, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Assignment of Sales Contract



 EXHIBIT 10.17.1 
 ASSIGNMENT OF SALES CONTRACT 
 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned,
CRESCENT RESOURCES, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (the “Assignor”), hereby transfers and assigns unto GGT CRESCENT CROSSTOWN FL VENTURE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, all of the undersigned’s right,
title and interest in and to that certain Sales Contract between Assignor, as Buyer and Crosstown Owner LLC, a Florida limited liability company, as Seller, having an Effective Date of March 24, 2011, as same may have been amended through the
date hereof (the “Contract”) which Contract was entered into with respect to the sale and purchase of approximately 25.344 acres of land located in Hillsborough County, Florida. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Assignment of Sales Contract to be duly executed, sealed and
delivered this 27th day of March, 2012. 

 

					
	CRESCENT RESOURCES, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company
			
		 	 By:
	 	 /s/ Brian J. Natwick

		 		 	 Brian J. Natwick,

		 		 	 President, Multifamily Division
Datte: 12 December 2023 **********************

NSN: 8960-01-505-4236 (GCE) * MONOGRAPH M7T2 

 **********************

Item: Grape carbohydrate electrolyte beverage powder

Document: PCR-B-013, Beverage Powder, Carbohydrate Electrolyte, Packaged in a Flexible 

Pouch

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 100 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Powdered product: Uniformly blended, free-flowing, homogenous dry mixture.

Hydrated product: Blue color.

Odor: Powdered product: Odor typical of flavor specified.

Hydrated product: Moderate to strong sweet grape.

Flavor: Hydrated product: Moderate to strong sweet grape; may have a slightly salty flavor.

Texture:

Powdered product: Free from hard lumps.

Hydrated product: No discernable lumps; sediment free.

Possible Deteriorative Changes

Appearance: Powdered product: Caking, lumpiness, darkened areas and off-colors.

Hydrated product: Darkened color, cloudiness, settling or undissolved material.

Odor: Powdered product: Scorched.

Hydrated product: Decreased moderate to strong sweet grape; scorched.

Flavor: Hydrated product: Decreased moderate to strong sweet grape; scorched.

Texture: Powdered product: Caked or lumpy, not free-flowing.

Hydrated product: Particles fail to disperse when hydrated.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Initial exam shall be done in the dry state. For final exam, prepare beverage in accordance with package 

directions. Product should dissolve completely within two minutes. Check package seal integrity for 

poor seals due to improper sealing or product in seal area.

Special Notes

Service is significantly affected if the powder is caked. Caking is an indication of high moisture levels, 

absence of anticaking ingredient and/or extremely high storage temperatures, i.e., over 125°F for more 

than one month.
No. 11-501.

#### Farmers Insurance Exchange, Petitioner v. Ed Aguilar, et al.

565 U.S. 1112, 132 S. Ct. 1014,

181 L. Ed. 2d 736,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 296.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
No. 11-518.

#### Sarah Worrell, Petitioner v. Houston Can! Academy.

565 U.S. 1113, 132 S. Ct. 1017,

181 L. Ed. 2d 737,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 349.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 424 Fed. Appx. 330.
No. 11-425.

#### Applebee’s International, Inc., Petitioner v. Gerald A. Fast, et al.

565 U.S. 1156, 132 S. Ct. 1094,

181 L. Ed. 2d 977,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 709.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 638 F.3d 872.
22 December 2014 **********************

NSN: 8920-01-525-3546 (CCB) * MONOGRAPH M4A3 

 **********************

Item: Cobbler, Cherry blueberry

Document: PCR-C-058, Cobbler, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 250 Component Classification: Primary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Cooked cherry blueberry cobbler with a baked cookie/crust containing chopped pecans.

Cooked cherries and blueberries: Dark reddish purple color, distinct pieces.

Sauce: Dark reddish purple color, slightly to moderately thick, glossy.

Cookie/crust: Intact, tinted dark reddish purple color from contact with the sauce.

Odor: Cooked cherry blueberry.

Cookie/crust: Sweet, slightly nutty.

Flavor:

Cooked cherry blueberry.

Sweet, slightly tart.

Cookie/crust: Sweet, slightly nutty.

Texture:

Cherries and blueberries: Slightly firm to slightly soft.

Sauce: Smooth, slightly to moderately thick.

Cookie/crust: Moist. Firm, slightly crunchy pecans.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Browning of fruit and sauce. Syneresis. 

Odor: Stale, fermented, caramelized.

Flavor: Fermented, caramelized, sour fruit and sauce. Nuts rancid.

Texture: Sauce may become thinner; cookie/crust gelatinous or pudding-like. Fruit may become

excessively soft.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

There may be some fruit skins and small seeds present in the sauce.
*************************** 

 * MONOGRAPH: FPS/GP 05 

 *************************** 

ITEM: Wintergreen Bar, White, Compressed, Natural, Artificial 

Flavor (40 gm) 

 

ITEM SPECIFICATION: MIL-W-44464 

NSN: 8940-01-369-1434 (WIM) (Primary) 

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE: 157 kilocalories 

CHARACTERISTICS:

APPEARANCE: 

3” x 1” compact bar, bright white, dense, dull surface, chalk-like. 

ODOR: 

Dominant wintergreen, fresh, sweet, mint. 

 

FLAVOR: 

Dominant wintergreen, sweet, strong mint, fresh. 

TEXTURE: 

High initial firmness, crumbles in mouth, brittle, chalky, gritty, fine crystals. 

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES: 

APPEARANCE: 

Worn edges, excessive crumble, darkening or graying. 

ODOR: 

Diminished wintergreen/mint, low sweet, sour, chemical note, alcohol. 

 

FLAVOR: 

Decreased wintergreen/mint, perfume, chemical, alcohol. 

TEXTURE: 

Excessively firm, hard to bite, increased chalkiness, powdery, increased grittiness. 

 

*SPECIAL NOTES: 

 Check odor on just opened package for best evaluation of quality. Check for vacuum 

packaging. Product typically not crumbly even when excess handling occurs.
#### C. B. Witt Company, a Corporation, Appellant, v. S. H. Bullock, as Receiver of the State Bank of Kissimmee, Kissimmee, Florida, an Insolvent Florida Banking Corporation, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February 11, 1926.

*Allen & Morrow,*for Appellant;

*Johnston & Garrett,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the *275respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
No. 10-1495.

#### Darlene Sammarco, Petitioner v. Cal Ludeman, et al.

565 U.S. 1101, 132 S. Ct. 867,

181 L. Ed. 2d 564,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8908.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 824, 132 S. Ct. 114, 181 L. Ed. 2d 39, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5625.
Exhibit 35.9  LOGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1050-084, 8th Fl
401 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2017, by and among MORGAN STANLEY CAPITAL I
INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as General Special Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer and as NCB Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO
BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates Series 2017-BNK5 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:  1.
A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.  LOGOLeslie Hayton Managing Director
Wells Fargo Bank   Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.



LOGO
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $13.33 CWT 0.965 $12.8635

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.7452 LB 3.5 $6.1082

Class I Price $18.9717

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $14.63 CWT 0.965 $14.1180

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.0763 LB 3.5 $7.2671

Class I Price $21.3850

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT ($2.4134)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.2075)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.1038)

Price change per quart ($0.0519)

Price change per pint ($0.0259)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.0195)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.0162)

Price change per half pint ($0.0130)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon ($0.21)

Price adjustment per half gallon ($0.10)

Price adjustment per quart ($0.05)

Price adjustment per pint ($0.03)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.02)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.02)

Price adjustment per half pint ($0.01)

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: January 6, 2013
No. 11-6504.

#### Thomas L. Mercer, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 990, 132 S. Ct. 528,

181 L. Ed. 2d 370,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7697.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
17 October 2012 NSN: ************************* 

8920-01-458-7325 (WWSB) *MONOGRAPH NO: M4Y3

*************************

Item: White wheat snack bread, Single pack (Type VI, Style A)

Document: PCR-S-009, Snack Bread, Fortified, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf Stable 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 185 Component Classification: PRIMARY

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F 

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Flat and intact with docker holes. Light golden tan color surface with interior crumb a 

paler color than surface or an off-white color. No evidence of excessive heating 

(materially darkened or scorched).

Odor: Slightly sweet. 

Flavor: Bland, slightly sweet. 

Texture: Moist, short and biscuit-like. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkened surface and interior crumb. 

Odor: Extreme bitterness, rancidity, staleness.

Flavor: Extreme bitterness, rancidity, staleness.

Texture: Dry and brittle. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

N/A
Corrected Opinion issued April 18, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00498-CR

———————————

LOSTON MOORE, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1572146

CORRECTED MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Loston Moore, Jr. filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in 

compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.2(a). The State has not opposed this motion. We have not issued a decision in the 

appeal.
2

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss 

any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Lloyd, Kelly, and Hightower.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
No. 11-6615.

#### Gregory Byers, on Behalf of Nicole Byers, Petitioner v. Marlboro County School District.

565 U.S. 1018, 132 S. Ct. 560,

181 L. Ed. 2d 404,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8018.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 443 Fed. Appx. 859.
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
  PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Bruce T. Leitch, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
  Financial Officer of NorPac Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify
  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2003, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
        and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                 

| | By:    | /s/ Bruce T. Leitch                                
| | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------
| |        |                                                    
| | Name:  | BRUCE T. LEITCH                                    
| |        |                                                    
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                                                    
| | Date:  | August 10, 2004                                    

A signed original of this written statement required by
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
  and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which
  it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
  the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
  before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation
  language contained in such filing.

---