alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 151 (Thursday, August 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42017-42018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20988]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-304-001]

Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

July 31, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 29, 1998, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of 
America (Natural) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, Substitute Fourth Revised Sheet No. 409 and 
Second Revised Sheet No. 410 to be effective August 1, 1998.
    Natural states that these tariff sheets were filed in compliance 
with the Commission's letter order issued July 17, 1998 in Docket No. 
RP98-304-000 (Letter Order). Natural believes that the tariff revisions 
made in the instant filing will bring Natural's Tariff into full 
compliance with the Commission's Order No. 587-G.
    Natural requested waiver of the Commission's Regulations to the 
extent necessary to permit the tendered tariff sheets to become 
effective August 1, 1998, pursuant to Order No. 587-G and the Letter 
Order.
    Natural states that copies of the filing are being mailed to 
Natural's customers, interested state regulatory agencies and all 
parties set out on the official service list in Docket No. RP98-304.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the

[[Page 42018]]

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in Section 
154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies 
of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20988 Filed 8-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
APPX A 

DPSCH 4155.2 

****************************** 

*M ONOG R A PH NO.: M 6D 

 ***************************

ITEM: Jelly, Grape 

NSN: 8940-00-149-1058 IT E M SPE CIFICAT ION: MIL-C-44068

APPR OXIMATE CALOR IC VALUE: 75 Kilocalories (Ancillary)

CHAR ACT E R IST ICS OF IT EM:

APPEARANCE: Burgundy colored. Slight weeping of liquid from gel (slight

syneresis).

ODOR: Sweet grape, slightly fermented.

FLAVOR: Sweet, low grape.

TEXTURE: Smooth, soft gel.

DE FE C T S L IK E L Y T O OC CUR :

APPEARANCE: Amber to brown color. Moderate to extreme syneresis or

liquefaction.

ODOR: Slightly scorched, fermented.

FLAVOR: Fermented, caramelized, burnt or scorched, extreme loss of grape

flavor. 

TEXTURE: Moderate to extreme loss of gel structure; moderate to extreme

syneresis, liquefied (total loss of gel structure). 

UNI QUE E X AM I NAT I ON/T E ST PR OC E DUR E S: Do not knead package prior to opening as 

this will damage the gel structure. Open package by cutting off three seals and laying it open like a 

book so as to expose the product. If mold is noted or suspected, examine the pouch very closely for 

tears, cuts or holes. If package integrity has been compromised, score a defect against the package 

and note the finding of the mold in the remarks. To check product for weeping, place it on a flat 

smooth surface such as a paper plate or egg breakout dish. 

SPE CIAL NOT E S: The degree of loss of grape flavor can be expected to vary with the vendor and 

DoP. Slight loss of flavor should be expected even under ideal storage conditions and should not be 

scored. 

.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 37565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18739]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the special meeting of the Farm 
Credit Administration Board (Board).

DATE AND TIME: The special meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on July 
14, from 9:00 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Floyd Fithian, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4025, TDD (703) 883-4444.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting of the Board will be 
open to the public (limited space available), and parts will be closed 
to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board 
meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in 
advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes
B. New Business
    --Regulation
    --Capital (Phase III) [12 CFR Part 615] (Final)

Closed Session*
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    *Session closed-exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (8), (9), 
and (10).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Report
    1. OSMO Report
    2. OGC Litigation Update

    Dated: July 8, 1998.
Floyd Fithian,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 98-18739 Filed 7-9-98; 3:14 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-M
DENT 

Table IV, Defect No. 208 – Lower limit of a minor defect. 

Moderately deep angular indentation with moderately acute 

crimping of the body wall.
No. 10-11078.

#### Serafin Reyes, Jr., Petitioner v. Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 1110, 132 S. Ct. 996,

181 L. Ed. 2d 732,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 264,

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 424 Fed. Appx. 659.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38834]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19289]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY


Senior Executive Service; Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Federal Labor Relations Authority.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the names on the Performance Review 
Board.

DATES: July 20, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michele Pilipovich, Human Resources 
Director, Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA), 607 Fourteenth 
Street, NW, Washington, DC 20424-0001, (202) 482-6660.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 4314(c)(1) through (5) of Title 5, 
U.S.C. requires that each agency establish, in accordance with 
regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or 
more performance review boards. The boards shall review and evaluate 
the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the 
supervisor, and make recommendations to the appointing authority 
relative to the performance of the senior executive.
    The following persons will serve on the FLRA's Performance Review 
Board:

Solly Thomas, Office of the Executive Director, FLRA
William E. Washington, Office of the General Counsel, FLRA
Deidre Flippen, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Gloria Joseph, National Labor Relations Board
Darrell L. Netherton, Merit Systems Protection Board
Solly Thomas,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 98-19289 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6727-01-P
July 9 , 2015

Mr. R oland Beason

Si Global, Inc

1791 OG Skinner Drive, Suite C

West Point, GA 31833

Dear Mr. Beason :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your July 1 st 2015 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

-

26 32 ), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief , the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safet y or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to p rocess your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption

.

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Ana lyst

, Airmen and

Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
No. 11-5928.

#### William M. Baker, Jr., Petitioner v. Gerdenich Realty Company.

565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1083,

181 L. Ed. 2d 801,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 534.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 952, 132 S. Ct. 422, 181 L. Ed. 2d 275, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7375.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-10927 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN JOSÉ PAREDES-ESCOBEDO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CR-33-Y

-------------------- April 12, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Juan José Paredes-Escobedo appeals his conviction and sentence for one count of illegal reentry of a previously deported alien pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a), (b)(2). Paredes argues that his plea was rendered involuntary by the district court’s failure to admonish him that the “aggravated felony” provision of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) stated an element of the charge against him that had to be proved to a jury. Pursuant to Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 243 (1998), this element did not have to be proved to a jury. Accordingly,No. 00-10927 -2- this argument lacks merit. Paredes acknowledges that AlmendarezTorres controls, but he raises this issue to preserve it for review by the Supreme Court. Because Paredes has not shown error on the part of the district court, the judgment of that court is AFFIRMED.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 351 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4653 

[Report No. 109–610] 

To repeal a prohibition on the use of certain funds for tunneling in certain 

areas with respect to the Los Angeles to San Fernando Valley Metro 

Rail project, California. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 22, 2005 

Mr. WAXMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

JULY 28, 2006 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To repeal a prohibition on the use of certain funds for 

tunneling in certain areas with respect to the Los Angeles to San Fernando Valley Metro Rail project, California. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4653 RH

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROHIBITION. 

2 The second sentence of section 321 of the Depart3 ment of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropria4 tions Act, 1986 (99 Stat. 1287) is repealed. 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS

wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 351 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4653 

[Report No. 109

–610] 

A BILL 

To repeal a prohibition on the use of certain funds 

project, California. Los Angeles to San Fernando Valley Metro Rail for tunneling in certain areas with respect to the 

JULY 28, 2006 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
No. 11-287.

#### Skechers U.S.A., Inc., Petitioner v. Patty Tomlinson.

565 U.S. 1021, 132 S. Ct. 551,

181 L. Ed. 2d 410,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8029.

November 7, 2011.

Motion of Center for Class Action Fairness for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
25 September 2008 ***************************** 

NSN: 8905-01-567-8777 * MONOGRAPH NO: M2Z2 

 ****************************

Item: Pork Sausage Patty, Maple Flavored (PPM) 

Document: PCR-P-045, Pork Sausage Patty, Maple Flavored, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, 

Shelf Stable 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 230 Component Classification: Primary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80F 

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Pork sausage patty rectangular in shape, roughly textured surface, and a golden brown 

color. Purge: brown to golden brown. 

Odor: Pork sausage patty: cooked pork and slight maple. 

Flavor: Pork sausage patty: cooked pork and slight maple. 

Texture: Pork sausage patty medium grind, cohesive, and moist and tender. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkened meat and purge, dry, oil separation. 

 

Odor: Rancid, strong canned old pork odor. 

Flavor: Rancid, bitter, loss of maple flavor, strong canned old pork flavor. 

Texture: Rubbery, dry meat, mushy, oily purge. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures 

NA 

Special Notes 

NA
25 September 2008 ***************************** 

NSN: 8905-01-567-8777 * MONOGRAPH NO: M2Z2 

 ****************************
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SCOTT A. SEARS, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) 

v. ) Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-02901 (UNA) 

) 

DR. WARREN, ) 

) 

Defendant. ) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff’s pro se complaint and 

application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). The Court will grant the IFP 

application and dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 

12(h)(3). 

Plaintiff brings undefined causes of action against “Dr. Warren,” the head psychologist at

Lompoc Residential Drug Abuse Camp. See generally Compl., Dkt. 1. Plaintiff does not provide 

an address or any other identifying information for defendant or the Camp. See id. Plaintiff is 

apparently dissatisfied with his treatment by Dr. Warren, whom he broadly alleges engaged in 

“wrongdoing,” and argues that Dr. Warren engaged in favoritism and nepotism while treating 

patients at the Camp. See id. 

The subject matter jurisdiction of the federal district courts is limited and is set forth 

generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdiction is available 

only when a “federal question” is presented or the parties are of diverse citizenship and the amount 

in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking relief in the district court must at least plead facts 

that bring the suit within the court's jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Failure to plead such 

facts warrants dismissal of the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). 

10/13/2020 
Plaintiff does not raise any federal question, and has not alleged sufficient facts to satisfy 

his burden to establish diversity jurisdiction. Accordingly, this case will be dismissed. A separate 

order accompanies this memorandum opinion. 

Date: October 13, 2020

DABNEY L. FRIEDRICH 

United States District Judge
No. 11M42.

#### In re Saeed Bakhouche, aka Abdul Razak Ali, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 1011, 132 S. Ct. 569,

181 L. Ed. 2d 394,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8041.

November 7, 2011.

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis without an affidavit of indigency executed by petitioner granted.
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS FOR FORM 10-Q**I, Steven P. Dussek, Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Cellular Corporation (the “registrant”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report isbeing prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.        August 9, 2006 /s/ STEVEN P. DUSSEK   Steven P. Dussek   *Chief Executive Officer*
No. 11-5707.

#### Jeffrey Sanders, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.

565 U.S. 1055, 132 S. Ct. 796,

181 L. Ed. 2d 478,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8650.

November 28, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
No. 11-5829.

#### Steven M. Jacob, Petitioner v. Robert P. Houston, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services.

565 U.S. 961, 132 S. Ct. 457,

181 L. Ed. 2d 291,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7525.

October 17, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Letter from the General Partner extending Mgmt Agreement with Eckhardt Trading



 Exhibit 10.7(a) 
 June 1, 2011 
 Eckhardt Trading Company 

1314 North Dearborn Parkway 
 The Carriage House

 Chicago, Illinois 60610 
 Attention:
Ms. Audrey L. Gale 
 Re: Management Agreement Renewal 
 Dear Ms. Gale: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreement concerning the
commodity pool to which reference is made below (the “Management Agreement”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreement through June 30, 2012 and all other provisions of the Management Agreement will remain unchanged.

  

	 	•	 	 CMF Eckhardt Master Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1302. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

					
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC	 	
			
	By:	 	 /s/ Jennifer Magro
	 	
		 	Jennifer Magro	 	
		 	Chief Financial Officer and Director	 	
		
	ECKHARDT TRADING COMPANY	 	
			
	By:	 	 /s/ John D. Fornengo
	 	
		 	Print Name: John D. Fornengo	 	

 JM/sr
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          43,381
<SECURITIES>                                     9,290
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,889
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (279)
<INVENTORY>                                        282
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,040
<PP&E>                                           4,095
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (846)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  64,790
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,865
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,801
<OTHER-SE>                                    (17,677)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    64,790
<SALES>                                          4,422
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,422
<CGS>                                            2,041
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        1
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,298
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   112
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  30
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,308)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,308)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,308)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.24)
        

</TABLE>