alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                  0001066849
<NAME>                        Site2Shop.Com, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1
<CURRENCY>                            U.S. Dollar

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,312,351
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,227,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     97,591
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,031,064
<PP&E>                                         729,044
<DEPRECIATION>                               (343,997)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,556,312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,493,522
<BONDS>                                         10,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,480
<OTHER-SE>                                   (960,490)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,556,312
<SALES>                                      4,840,928
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,840,928
<CGS>                                        1,064,682
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,064,682
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,940,018
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,779
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                833,449
<INCOME-TAX>                                   332,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            501,449
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   501,449
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      32,367,000
<SECURITIES>                                27,365,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               33,964,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,269,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,704,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            96,772,000
<PP&E>                                     208,082,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (30,938,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,493,989,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       62,882,000
<BONDS>                                  1,194,080,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                365,588,000
<COMMON>                                         3,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (128,564,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,493,989,000
<SALES>                                    127,364,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           127,364,000
<CGS>                                       19,116,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              102,545,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                59,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          53,499,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (26,288,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    56,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (26,344,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (26,344,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 11-6583.

#### Job Duran-Garcia, aka Joe Jimenez, aka Job Garson-Duran, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 992, 132 S. Ct. 534,

181 L. Ed. 2d 375,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7695.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 850.
No. 11-6605.

#### Jeffrey Andre Hill, Petitioner v. Kathleen Allison, Acting Warden.

565 U.S. 1067, 132 S. Ct. 775,

181 L. Ed. 2d 497,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8642.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 11-7474.

#### Jorge Muentes, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1132, 132 S. Ct. 1053,

181 L. Ed. 2d 773,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 254.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 11-260.

#### Esther Hall, Petitioner v. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services.

565 U.S. 1079, 132 S. Ct. 815,

181 L. Ed. 2d 525,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8711.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 640 F.3d 1351.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3026 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3026

To require that a College Scorecard be maintained for each institution 
of higher education that participates in programs under title IV of the 
         Higher Education Act of 1965, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2019

 Mrs. Trahan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require that a College Scorecard be maintained for each institution 
of higher education that participates in programs under title IV of the 
         Higher Education Act of 1965, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``The College Data Access Act''.

SEC. 2. COLLEGE SCORECARD REQUIRED.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Education shall maintain and 
annually update the College Scorecard described in subsection (b).
    (b) College Scorecard Described.--The College Scorecard described 
in this subsection is the online tool maintained by the Department of 
Education as of the date of the enactment of this Act that allows 
users--
            (1) to view certain data relating to each institution of 
        higher education eligible to participate in programs under 
        title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070 et 
        seq.), including institution and program-level data on the net 
        costs of attendance, transfer and enrollment rates, graduation 
        rates, average student loan debt, threshold earnings, and 
        average earnings after graduation; and
            (2) to compare such institutions and programs based on such 
        data.

SEC. 3. DISPLAY OF COLLEGE SCORECARD BY INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER 
              EDUCATION.

    Section 487(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1094(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(30)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the 
        institution will prominently display, on the home page of the 
        institution's website, a link to the most recent version of the 
        institution's College Scorecard as maintained by the Department 
        of Education pursuant to section 2 of the College Data Access 
        Act, or any successor to such online tool.
            ``(B) Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to an institution 
        that is a junior or community college.''.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    Sections 1 and 2 shall take effect on the date that is 90 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

             Certification of Chief Financial Officer
        Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of  Section  1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned  officer of Scotia Pacific Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

     (a) the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September  30,  2005 of the  Company  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and

     (b)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:    November 9, 2005
                                                   /S/  GARY L. CLARK
                                                  ---------------------------
                                                        Gary L. Clark
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code).
```
No. 11-6507.

#### Juan Alfredo Reyna, Jr., Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 1065, 132 S. Ct. 770,

181 L. Ed. 2d 494,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8609.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                               Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
                                5555 Darrow Road
                               Hudson, Ohio 44236

May 2, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The purpose of this letter is to address the requirements of the Securities and
Exchange Commission ("SEC") with respect to issuers that include accountants'
reports from Arthur Andersen LLP issued after March 14, 2002 in filings with the
SEC.

We have received, on the date hereof, representation from Arthur Andersen LLP
that their audit of the financial statements contained in Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.'s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 2, 2002, of which this
Exhibit 99.1 is a part, was subject to their quality control system for the U.S.
accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the
engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, and that
there was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel working on the
audit and availability of national office consultation to conduct the relevant
portions of the audit.

Sincerely,

/s/  Brian P. Carney
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
11 December 2019 ***********************

NSN: 8940-01-682-8141 (CPWP) * MONOGRAPH M4A19

 ***********************

Item: Chocolate pudding with protein (Type II)

Document: PCR-C-081A, Chocolate Pudding, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 270 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Smooth, glossy and moderately thick with no discernable lumps. A uniform medium 

brown color with no free liquid.

Odor: Sweet milk chocolate.

Flavor: Sweet milk chocolate.

Texture: Smooth, creamy and a slight to moderately thick consistency with no discernable 

lumps or excessive chalkiness.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkened, separated, curdled, syneresis.

Odor: Scorched milk odor.

Flavor: Increased bitterness. Scorched sour milk.

Texture: Product separates and solids become firm and liquid becomes runny.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

NA
Order entered February 6, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00542-CV

CAROLYN WAID, Appellant

V.

TARGET CORPORATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-00729-E

ORDER

Appellant Carolyn Waid’s February 3, 2023 Motion for Extension of Time 

to File Motion for Rehearing and En Banc Consideration is GRANTED.

Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing and En Banc Consideration, if any, is 

ORDERED filed on or before February 23, 2023. 

/Bill Pedersen, III/

BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE
### SALARY TABLE 2014-GS
INCORPORATING THE 1% GENERAL SCHEDULE INCREASE
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 2014

Hourly Basic (B) Rates by Grade and Step Hourly Overtime (O) Rates by Grade and Step

Grade B/O Step 1Step 2Step 3Step 4Step 5Step 6Step 7Step 8Step 9Step 10 1 B $ 8.62$ 8.90$ 9.19$ 9.48$ 9.76$ 9.93$ 10.21$ 10.50$ 10.51$ 10.78 O 12.93 13.35 13.79 14.22 14.64 14.90 15.32 15.75 15.77 16.17 2 B 9.69 9.92 10.24 10.51 10.63 10.94 11.25 11.56 11.88 12.19 O 14.54 14.88 15.36 15.77 15.95 16.41 16.88 17.34 17.82 18.29 3 B 10.57 10.92 11.27 11.63 11.98 12.33 12.68 13.03 13.39 13.74 O 15.86 16.38 16.91 17.45 17.97 18.50 19.02 19.5520.09 20.61 4 B 11.87 12.26 12.66 13.05 13.45 13.84 14.24 14.63 15.03 15.42 O 17.81 18.39 18.99 19.58 20.18 20.7621.3621.9522.5523.13 5 B 13.28 13.72 14.16 14.60 15.05 15.49 15.93 16.37 16.82 17.26 O 19.92 20.58 21.24 21.90 22.58 23.24 23.90 24.5625.23 25.89 6 B 14.80 15.29 15.78 16.28 16.77 17.26 17.76 18.25 18.74 19.24 O 22.20 22.94 23.6724.42 25.1625.89 26.64 27.38 28.11 28.86 7 B 16.44 16.99 17.54 18.09 18.64 19.18 19.73 20.28 20.83 21.38 O 24.6625.49 26.31 27.14 27.9628.7729.60 30.42 31.25 32.07 8 B 18.21 18.82 19.43 20.03 20.64 21.25 21.85 22.46 23.07 23.68 O 27.32 28.23 29.15 30.05 30.96 31.88 32.78 33.23 33.23 33.23 9 B 20.11 20.78 21.46 22.13 22.80 23.47 24.14 24.81 25.48 26.15 O 30.1731.1732.19 33.20 33.23 33.23 33.23 33.23 33.23 33.23 10 B 22.15 22.89 23.63 24.37 25.10 25.84 26.58 27.32 28.06 28.80 O 33.23 33.23 33.23 33.23 33.23 33.23 33.23 33.23 33.23 33.23 11 B 24.34 25.15 25.96 26.77 27.58 28.39 29.20 30.01 30.83 31.64 O 33.23 33.23 33.23 33.23 33.23 33.23 33.23 33.23 33.23 33.23 12 B 29.17 30.14 31.11 32.09 33.06 34.03 35.00 35.98 36.95 37.92 O 33.23 33.23 33.23 33.23 33.23 34.03 35.00 35.98 36.95 37.92 13 B 34.69 35.84 37.00 38.16 39.31 40.47 41.62 42.78 43.94 45.09 O 34.69 35.84 37.00 38.16 39.31 40.4741.62 42.78 43.94 45.09 14 B 40.99 42.36 43.72 45.09 46.45 47.82 49.19 50.55 51.92 53.28 O 40.99 42.36 43.72 45.09 46.45 47.82 49.19 50.55 51.92 53.28 15 B 48.21 49.82 51.43 53.04 54.64 56.25 57.86 59.46 61.07 62.68 O 48.21 49.82 51.43 53.04 54.64 56.25 57.86 59.46 61.07 62.68
SOUTH PHILLY REVIEW 


METRO PHILADELPHIA 


THE PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER 
Affidavit of Publication 

On Behalf of: 

ARCADIS U S, INC

824 N MARKET ST #820

WILMINGTON, DE 19801

STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA:

Before the undersigned authority personally appeared the undersigned who, on oath represented a

and say: that I am an employee of The Philadelphia Inquirer, LLC, and am authorized to make this

affidavit of publication, and being duly sworn, I depose and say:

1. The Philadelphia Inquirer, LLC is the publisher of the Philadelphia Inquirer, with its headquarters at

801 Market Street, Suite 300, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107.

2. The Philadelphia Inquirer is a newspaper that which was established in in the year 1829, since

which date said daily newspaper has been continuously published and distributed daily in the City of

Philadelphia, count and state aforesaid.

3. The printed notice or publication attached hereto set forth on attached

hereto was published in all regular print editions of 

The Philadelphia Inquirer on

Legal Notices

as published in Inquirer Legals in the issue(s) of: 

10/31/2021

4. Under oath, I state that the following is true and correct, and that neither I nor The Philadelphia

Inquirer, LLC have any is interest in the subject matter of the aforesaid notice or advertisement.

 

Ad No: 83563 

Customer No: 112401

COPY OF ADVERTISEMENT

Page 1 of 1
No. 11-6519.

#### Lavelle W. Searcy, Petitioner v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 1065, 132 S. Ct. 771,

181 L. Ed. 2d 495,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8510.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 11-6968.

#### Martin M. Gevers, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1045, 132 S. Ct. 602,

181 L. Ed. 2d 441,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8162.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
1995 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

5-15-1995

Whittle v Local 641

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 94-5334

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1995 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Whittle v Local 641" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 101.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/101
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

 

No. 94-5334 

 

MICHAEL J. WHITTLE; JAMES CALANDRILLO, 

 Appellants 

V. 

LOCAL 641, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, 

CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, 

AFL-CIO; YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC. 

 

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING 

 

Present: COWEN, NYGAARD and ALITO, Circuit Judges

 

 The petition for panel rehearing filed by appellee 

Yellow Freight System, Inc. in the above-entitled case, having 

been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of 

this court, is granted. 

 The opinion of this court entered April 17, 1995 and 

the judgment entered thereon are vacated and the petition for in 

banc consideration suspended. 

 By the Court, 

 

 \s\ Richard L. Nygaard 

 

 Circuit Judge 

Dated: May 15, 1995
No. 11-589.

#### James R. Fisher, et al., Petitioners v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

565 U.S. 1114, 132 S. Ct. 1075,

181 L. Ed. 2d 740,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 346.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 640 F.3d 645.
No. 10-10941.

#### Thelma Williams, Petitioner v. Correctional Officer Moore.

565 U.S. 804, 132 S. Ct. 376,

181 L. Ed. 2d 5,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6467.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 137 (Friday, July 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38657-38658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19031]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Nonprescription Drugs Advisory Committee: Amendment of Notice

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an 
amendment to the notice of meeting of the Nonprescription Drugs 
Advisory Committee. This meeting was announced in the Federal Register 
of June 26, 1998 (63 FR 34902). The amendment is being made to cancel 
the entire session on July 28, 1998. There are no other changes.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rhonda W. Stover or Angie Whitacre, 
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (HFD-21), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-7001, 
or FDA Advisory Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-
0572 in the Washington, DC area), code 12541.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of June 26, 1998 (63 
FR 34902), FDA announced that a meeting of the Nonprescription Drugs 
Advisory Committee would be held on July 28 and 29, 1998.
    1. On page 34902, in the third column, the ``Date and Time'' 
portion is amended to read as follows:
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on July 29, 1998, 8:30 a.m. 
to 5 p.m.
    2. On page 34902, beginning in the third column, the ``Agenda'' 
portion is amended by removing the first paragraph.

[[Page 38658]]

    3. On page 34903, in the first column, under the ``Procedure'' 
portion, in the ninth line, ``July 28 and 29'' is corrected to read 
``July 29''.
    Dated: July 10, 1998.
Michael A. Friedman,
Deputy Commissioner for Operations.
[FR Doc. 98-19031 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128445(50) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

DANIEL BARRY COUCH, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices 

v SC: 128445 

 COA: 256899 

Oakland CC: 2003-047997-NM 

RAYMOND A. CORRELL, and RAYMOND 

A. CORRELL, P.C., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order of 

September 28, 2005 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the 

order was entered erroneously. 

p0123 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 30, 2006 

Clerk