alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. ER05-1410-012; EL05-148-012; Docket No. ER09-412-001]

                    In                     *PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.*, 124 FERC ¶ 61,272, at P 53 (2008), the Commission indicated that it expected to hold a technical conference in this proceeding in February 2009. The date of that conference is hereby deferred pending further notice.                

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-3969 Filed 2-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 151 (Thursday, August 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 42018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20990]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-307-001]


Stingray Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

July 31, 1998
    Take notice that on July 29, 1998, Stingray Pipeline Company 
(Stingray) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third 
Revised Volume No. 1, Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 199 and Second 
Revised Sheet No. 200 to be effective August 1, 1998.
    Stingray states that these tariff sheets were filed in compliance 
with the Commission's letter order issued July 17, 1998 in Docket No. 
RP98-307-000 (Letter Order). Stingray believes that the tariff 
revisions made in the instant filing will bring Stingray's Tariff into 
full compliance with the Commission's Order No. 587-G.
    Stingray requested waiver of the Commission's Regulations to the 
extent necessary to permit the tendered tariff sheets to become 
effective August 1, 1998, pursuant to Order No. 587-G and the Letter 
Order.
    Stingray states that copies of the filing are being mailed to 
Stingray's customers, interested state regulatory agencies and all 
parties set out on the official service list in Docket No. RP98-307.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20990 Filed 8-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41192

Summary Calendar

YANKEE ENTERPRISES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

GREG M DYKEMAN

Appellee

VERSUS

DUNKIN’DONUTS INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Texas

(1:95-CV-136)

May 21, 1998

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM*:

Dunkin’ Donuts, Inc. appeals the district court’s decision

denying its motion for sanctions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927.
Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm.

Yankee Enterprises, Inc. is a franchisee that operates a

Dunkin’ Donuts store in Beaumont, Texas. In 1994, Yankee brought

suit against Dunkin’ Donuts alleging that Dunkin Donuts had

breached the franchise agreement and violated the DTPA. A jury

awarded Yankee $747.723.00. The Fifth Circuit reversed and

rendered, holding that there was insufficient evidence of

causation. Yankee Enterprises, Inc. v. Dunkin’ Donuts, Inc., No.

96-40735, slip op. (5th Cir. July 8, 1997). After the case was

remanded to the district court, Dunkin’ Donuts moved for sanctions

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927, alleging various unreasonable and

vexatious conduct by counsel for Yankee Enterprises. The district

court denied the sanctions motion. Dunkin’ Donuts timely appeals.

We review a denial of sanctions under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 for

abuse of discretion. Matta v. May, 118 F.3d 410, 413 (5th Cir.

1997). Section 1927 applies to an attorney “who so multiplies the

proceedings in any case unreasonably and vexatiously.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 1927. In this case, most of the conduct alleged to be vexatious

was allowed by the district court during trial. Typically,

protection under § 1927 should come from the district court. This

appeal presents a close case, but upon review of the record as a

whole, we cannot say that the district court abused its broad

discretion by denying the sanctions motion. See Pease v. Pakhoed

Corp., 980 F.2d 995 (5th Cir. 1993)(district court has broad

discretion in denying sanctions under § 1927).
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
NO. 07-03-0213-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL A JANUARY

8, 2004

______________________________ CHAD STUART JONES, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A PPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE CO UNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF MONT GOMERY COUNT Y;

NO. 02-177738; H ONORABLE JER RY WINFREE, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ. MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION Followi ng his conv iction for driving while intoxicated, appellant C had Stuart Jones perfected this appeal. Pending befo re this C ourt is appel lant’s motion to dismiss the appeal. As r

equ ire d by

Rul e 42. 2(a)

of th e Texas R ules

of A ppellate Procedure, the requestto withdraw the notice of appeal is signed by appellant. No decision of this Court2

having been delive red to date, we grant the moti on and dismiss the appeal. No motion for rehearing will b e entertained and o ur mandate wi ll issue fort hwith. Accordingl y, the appeal is dismiss ed. Don H. Reavis Justice Do not publish .
No. 11-7652.

#### Perry Reese, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1137, 132 S. Ct. 1067,

181 L. Ed. 2d 782,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 541.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 442 Fed. Appx. 8.
No. 11-7384.

#### Jose Boanerge Zavala, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, et al.

565 U.S. 1164, 132 S. Ct. 1107,

181 L. Ed. 2d 991,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 755.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 436 Fed. Appx. 276.
No. 11-678 (R46-006).

#### Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund, Petitioner v. Bio-Medical Application of Tennessee, Inc.

565 U.S. 1152, 132 S. Ct. 1087,

181 L. Ed. 2d 805,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 580.

January 11, 2012.

The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in the above-entitled case was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Same case below, 656 F.3d 277.
No. 11-7154.

#### Tolliver R. Quaco, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1086, 132 S. Ct. 831,

181 L. Ed. 2d 538,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8703.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 443 Fed. Appx. 821.
No. 11-6499.

#### Cameron Shawn Jackson, Petitioner v. David A. Varano, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Coal Township, et al.

565 U.S. 1065, 132 S. Ct. 768,

181 L. Ed. 2d 494,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8539.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DANIEL DAVID FER R IS

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 00 222

- C R

Appeal from the

243 rd D istrict C ourt

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 20170D0 0570 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State ’ s third m otion for extension of time within which to file the

brief until August 18 , 201 9

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO F ILE

THE STATE ’S BR IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. J aime E. Esparza

, the State ’s attorney, prepare the

State ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before August 18 , 2019

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 3 rd day of Ju ly , 20 1 9

.

PER CURIAM

Before McCl ure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox , JJ.
4 March 2010 ***************************

NSN: 8940-01-586-7165 (WMB) * MONOGRAPH NO: FS1-10

 ***************************

Item: Filled Wrap, Shelf Stable, Mexican style beef (Type II)

Document: MIL-DTL-32347, Filled Wrap, Shelf Stable, for Operational Rations

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 360 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 2 years at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Filling: Mexican style beef, filling is enrobed by tortilla and not leaking out of tortilla.

Tortilla: uniform medium tan color.

Odor: Filling: tomato, chili powder, and cooked beef.

Tortilla: slight white grain.

Flavor:

Filling: tomato, chili powder, and cooked beef.

Tortilla: slight white grain.

Texture: Filling: slightly dry to moist.

Tortilla: soft, not be excessively dry or crumbly.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Filling: brown to black color or dry, crumbly.

Tortilla: overly dry or brown or burnt at edges. 

Odor: Stale, oxidized, rancid, scorched.

Flavor: Sour, bitter, stale, oxidized, rancid, scorched.

Texture: Filling: dry, crumbly, tough chewy meat.

Tortilla: dry, crumbly. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

This product should contain an oxygen scavenger packet. If defects such as oxidized or rancid odors 

exist, they are likely due to package failure or the absence of an oxygen scavenger.

Special Notes

Each pouch shall contain two intact filled wraps and one intact oxygen scavenger.

Some bleeding of filling into the wrap is normal but may increase over time.
m=1 m=1 m=1 m=1 m=1 Oxy Pasadena, TX Shintech Freeport, TX Formosa LA Oxy Deer Park, TX Shintech Plaquemine, LA Formosa DE Formosa SPVC TX Methanol 99% UPL 99.9% UPL99% UPL Non VC Non M TOHAP

12000 VC Top 5 Resins Non VC TOHAP 99% UPL 99.9% UPL

PVC Copolymer 8400 30000 48000 76 PVC Non-Copolymer 770 970 47 47 1100m=1 m=1 m=1 m=1 m=1

Methanol 99% UPL99.9% UPL

110 3100 Non VC Non VA TOHAP Vinyl Acetate

99% UPL99.9% UPL 99% UPL 99.9% UPL

290000 340 830 38000
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3207 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 114 Mill Street in Hookstown, Pennsylvania, 

as the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Dylan Elchin Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3207 EH

1 SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT DYLAN ELCHIN POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 114 Mill Street in Hookstown, 

5 Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Staff 

6 Sergeant Dylan Elchin Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Dylan 

11 Elchin Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 16, 

2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3207 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostDylan Elchin Post Office Building’’. Hookstown, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Staff Sergeant al Service located at 114 Mill Street in
RUST 

Table IV, Defect No. 109, Major defect. Pitted rust in deep 

scratches along side seam. The rust undoubtedly developed in the 

scratches—a related minor defect.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR


RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Spine Pain Management, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William F. Donovan, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 16, 2011
By:
/s/ William F. Donovan, M.D.William F. Donovan, M.D.Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 151 (Thursday, August 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 41998]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20963]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Yakima Provincial Interagency Executive Committee (PIEC), 
Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Yakima PIEC Advisory Committee will meet on August 27, 
1998, at the Cle Elum Ranger District office, 803 W. 2nd. Street, Cle 
Elum, Washington. The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. and continue 
until 4:00 p.m. This meeting will focus on rechartering, Adaptive 
Management Area Subcommittee progress, 1999 watershed restoration 
project proposals, Northwest Forest Plan monitoring report, and 
information sharing. All Yakima Province Advisory Committee meetings 
are open to the public. Interested citizens are welcome to attend.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct questions regarding this meeting to Paul Hart, Designated 
Federal Official, USDA, Wenatchee National Forest, 215 Melody Lane, 
Wenatchee, Washington 98801, 509-662-4335.

    Dated: July 23, 1998.
Mark Morris,
Administrative Officer, Wenatchee National Forest.
[FR Doc. 98-20963 Filed 8-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
EXHIBIT 23
                             BARRY L. FRIEDMAN, P.C.
                           CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

1582 TULITA DRIVE                                        OFFICE  (702) 361-8414
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA  89123                                  FAX NO.(702) 896-0278




To Whom It May Concern:                                         October 17, 2000

         The firm of Barry L. Friedman, P.C., Certified Public Accountant
consents to the inclusion of their report of October 17, 2000, on the Financial
Statements of COLLEGE SOFTWARE, INC., as of September 30, 2000, in any filings
that are necessary now or in the near future with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission.


Very truly yours,


/s/ Barry L. Friedman
--------------------------------------
Barry L. Friedman
Certified Public Accountant
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 146 (Thursday, July 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20408]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Holly Hill Watershed, Orangeburg County, SC

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service.

ACTION: Notice of a finding of no significant impact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)<Copyright> of the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the Council on Environmental Quality 
Regulations (40 CFR Part 1500); and the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service Regulations (7 CFR Part 650); the Natural Resources 
Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, gives notice that 
an environment impact statement is not being prepared for the Holly 
Hill Watershed, Orangeburg County, South Carolina.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark W. Berkland, state conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation 
Service, 1835 Assembly Street, room 950, Columbia, South Carolina 
29201, (803) 765-5681.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The environmental assessment of this 
federally assisted action indicated that the project will not cause 
significant local, regional, or national impacts on the environment. As 
a result of these findings Mark W. Berkland, state conservationist, has 
determined that the preparation and review of an environmental impact 
are not needed for this project.
    The project purposes are to reduce flooding and improve flow 
conditions on 9.0 miles of previously modified and/or new channels to 
facilitate the removal of stormwater in the Holly Hill area.
    The Notice of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) has been 
forwarded to the Environmental Protection Agency and to various 
Federal, State, and local agencies and interested parties. A limited 
number of copies of the FONSI are available to fill single copy 
requests at the above address. Basic data developed during the 
environmental assessment are on file and may be reviewed by contacting 
Luke Nance.
    No administrative action on implementation of the proposal will be 
taken until 30 days after the date of this publication in the Federal 
Register.

(This activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic 
Assistance under No. 10.904, Watershed Protection and Flood 
Prevention, and is subject to the provisions of Executive Order 
12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and 
local officials)
Mark W. Berkland,
State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. 98-20408 Filed 7-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-M
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Millburn L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Perry,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		November 15, 2004
No. 11-7752.

#### Roshay Lavoy Hocker, aka Roshay L. Hocker, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1169, 132 S. Ct. 1120,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1000,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 631.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 435 Fed. Appx. 398.
No. 11-7561.

#### Carlos Martinez-Vasquez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1135, 132 S. Ct. 1060,

181 L. Ed. 2d 778,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 115.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 795.
Date: 31 October 2023 ********************

NSN: 8940-01-713-8738 *MONOGRAPH: M2F

 ********************

Item: Chicken Stir Fry

Document: PCR-C-093, Chicken Stir Fry, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 260 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Mixture of cooked whole muscle chicken breast meat, brown rice, and vegetables in a 

sauce.

Chicken: Cooked whole muscle off-white to light tan color chicken breast meat pieces. 

At least 80 percent by weight of the chicken pieces shall be not less than 3/4 inches in 

any one dimension.

Rice: Cooked long grain parboiled distinct grains of light to medium tan color brown 

rice. May have a golden tan color from the sauce.

Carrots: Cooked orange colored discernible carrot dices.

Bell peppers: Cooked green and red bell pepper pieces.

Bamboo shoots: Cooked off-white colored bamboo shoot pieces.

Sauce: Glossy, semi-translucent, slightly to moderately thick, and a golden tan color.

Odor: Cooked chicken, brown rice, carrot, bell pepper, and bamboo shoot with a mild to 

moderate ginger and a mild sesame oil and soy sauce.

Flavor: Cooked chicken, brown rice, carrot, bell pepper, and bamboo shoot with a mild to 

moderate ginger and a mild sesame oil and soy sauce.

Texture:

Chicken: Moist and tender.

Rice: Moist and slightly soft to slightly firm.

Vegetables: Soft and tender.

Sauce: Smooth and slightly to moderately thick.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Excessive darkening of chicken, rice, and vegetables.

Odor: Scorched, sour, bitter, rancid, metallic. Loss of spice.

Flavor: Scorched, sour, bitter, rancid, metallic. Loss of spice.

Texture:

Chicken: Dry, rubbery, stringy, or chewy. 

Rice: Dry, excessively firm, or mushy.

Vegetables: Excessively mushy.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures: N/A

Special Notes: N/A
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $10.66 CWT 0.965 $10.29

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.9421 LB 3.5 $6.80

Class I Price $17.08

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $10.46 CWT 0.965 $10.09

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.8553 LB 3.5 $6.49

Class I Price $16.59

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.50

(4) Price change per gallon $0.04

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.02

Price change per quart $0.01

Price change per pint $0.01

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.00

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price change per half pint $0.00

(6) Price adjustment per gallon (128-oz) $0.04

Price adjustment per half gallon (64-oz) $0.02

Price adjustment per quart (32-oz) $0.01

Price adjustment per pint (16oz) $0.01

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.00

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint (8-oz) $0.00

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: Oct. 3rd, 2021