Analysis of Standards 90.1 

Meeting Evaluation 

February 17,2000 

1. What is your overall evaluation of this public meeting? 

Excellent Very Good Good d satisfactory Useless 

2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? 

Yes, More than I wanted -- No, Not nearly enough 

dyes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 

3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? 

Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 

&yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 

4. Based on this meeting, w-hat additional sieps are needed? 

5. How could we have improved this effort? 

6. Additional comments/suggestions 

w 

Thank you for filling out this evaluation 

Name (optional) 

6450-01-P COMMENT 21
Analysis of Standards 90.1 

Meeting Evaluation 

February 17,2000 

1. What is your overall evaluation of this public meeting? 

Excellent very ~ood x Good Satisfactory Useless 

2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? 

Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 

% Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 

3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? 

Yes, More than I wanted 

x~es, As much as I wanted 

No, Not nearly enough 

No, Not at all 

4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? 

iqr i'ci I P/*L( 1 

5. How could we have improved this effort? 

6. Additional commentslsuggestions 

Thank you for filling out this evaluation. 

Name (optional) 

6450-01-P COMMENT 21
Analysis of Standards 90.1 

Meeting Evaluation 

February 17,2000 

1. What is your overall evaluation of this public meeting? 

Excellent Very Good ' Good satisfactory Useless 

2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? 

Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 

Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 

3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? 

Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 

Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 

4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? 

POG. 

5. How could we have improved this effort? 

6. Additional comments/suggestions 

Thank you for$lling out this evaluation, < i JVSor Gl~iu J 

Name (optional) 

6450-01-P COMMENT 21
Analysis of Standards 90.1 

Meeting Evaluation 

February 17,2000 

1. What is your overall evaluation of this public meeting? 

Excellent Very Good J ~ood Satisfactory Useless 

2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? 

-f Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 

- Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 

3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? 

Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 

*Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 

4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? 

5. How could we have improved this effort? 

- 

6. Additional cornments/suggestions 

Thank you for filling out this evaluation. 

6450-01-P COMMENT 21
Analysis of Standards 90.1 

Meeting Evaluation 

February 17,2000 

1. What is your overall evaluation of this public meeting? 

Excellent Very Good ~ood l;i satisfactory Useless 

2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? 

Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 

Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 

3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? 

Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 

Des, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 

4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? 

C" 

yr r )$ 4b 

5. How could we have improved this effort? 

6. Additional comments/suggestions 

Thank you for filling out this evaluation. 

C 

Name (optibnal) 

6450-01-P COMMENT 21
Analysis of Standards 90.1 

Meeting Evaluation 

February 17,2000 

1. What is your overall evaluation of this public meeting? 

Excellent Very ~ood / ~ood Satisfactory Useless2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? 

Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 

Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 

3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? 

i 

LYes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 

Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 

4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? 

&h,&& - +>vLw.* *i"--p PI-^ U 

5. How could we have improved this effort? 

- 

- ;44Livn-i 1~ 42-L 

6. Additional cornments/suggestions 

-- 

Thank you for flling out this evaluation. 

Name (optional) 

6450-01-P COMMENT 21
Analysis of Standards 90.1 

Meeting Evaluation 

February 17,2000 

1. What is your overall evaluation of this public meeting? 

Excellent J ~ery~ood Good Satisfactory Useless 

2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? 

Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 

w Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 

3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? 

4es, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 

Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 

4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? 

5. How could we have improved this effort? 

R,in,s es+ I dwyoa~4(-if$fi'~ ~*~~'s' 

L' 

6. Additional cornments1suggestions 

117rank you for filling out this evaluation. /J lJc flf PJ 

Name (optional) 

6450-01-P COMMENT 21
Analysis of Standards 90.1 

Meeting Evaluation 

February 17,2000 

1. What is your overall evaluation of this public meeting? 

Excellent )( Very Good Good Satisfactory Useless 

2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? 

Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 

a Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 

3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? 

Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 

Fs, Asmuch as I wanted No, Not at all 

4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? 

5. How could we have improved this effort? 

6. Additional comments/suggestions 

Thank you for filling out this evaluation. 

6450-01-P COMMENT 21
Analysis of Standards 90.1 

Meeting Evaluation 

February 17,2000 

rall evaluation of this public meeting? 

Very Good Good Satisfactory Useless 

2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? 

ws, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 

dyes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 

3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? 

es, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 

As much as I wanted No, Not at all 

4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? 

5. How could we have improved this effort? 

6. Additional cornments/suggestions 

- ------I^- I. 

Thank you for filling out this evaluation 

6450-01-P COMMENT 21
Analysis of Standards 90.1 

Meeting Evaluation 

February 17,2000 

1. What is your overall evaluation of this public meeting? 

Excellent Very Good J Good Satisfactory Useless 

2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? 

Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 

Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 

3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? 

Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 

T~es, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 

4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? 

5. How could we have improved this effort? 

6. Additional comrnents/suggestions 

Thank you for filling out this evaluation 

Name (optional) 

6450-01-P COMMENT 21