Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 147 / Friday, July 31, 1998 / Notices 40933

(2) For the purpose of the

investigation so instituted, the following

are hereby named as parties upon which

this notice of investigation shall be

served:

(a) The complainant is—Cirrus Logic,

Inc., 3100 West Warren Avenue,

Fremont, CA 94538.

(b) The respondent is the following

company alleged to be in violation of

section 337, and is the party upon

which the complaint is to be served:

ATI Technologies, Inc., 33 Commerce

Valley Drive East, Thornhill, Ontario,

Canada L3T 7N6.

(c) Thomas S. Fusco, Esq., Office of

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.

International Trade Commission, 500 E

Street, S.W., Room 401, Washington,

D.C. 20436, who shall be the

Commission investigative attorney,

party to this investigation; and

(3) For the investigation so instituted,

the Honorable Debra Morriss is

designated as the presiding

Administrative Law Judge.

A response to the complaint and the

notice of investigation must be

submitted by the named respondent in

accordance with section 210.13 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure, 19 CFR § 210.13. Pursuant to

19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a) of the

Commission’s Rules, such a response

will be considered by the Commission

if received not later than 20 days after

the date of service by the Commission

of the complaint and the notice of

investigation. Extensions of time for

submitting a response to the complaint

will not be granted unless good cause

therefor is shown.

Failure of a respondent to file a timely

response to each allegation in the

complaint and in this notice may be

deemed to constitute a waiver of the

right to appear and contest the

allegations of the complaint and this

notice, and to authorize the

administrative law judge and the

Commission, without further notice to

the respondent, to find the facts to be as

alleged in the complaint and this notice

and to enter both an initial

determination and a final determination

containing such findings, and may

result in the issuance of a limited

exclusion order or a cease and desist

order or both directed against the

respondent.

Issued: July 28, 1998.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 98–20512 Filed 7–30–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary

Submission for OMB Review;

Comment Request

July 27, 1998.

The Department of Labor (DOL) has

submitted the following public

information collection requests (ICRs) to

the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) for review and approval in

accordance with the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13,

44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). A copy of each

individual ICR, with applicable

supporting documentation, may be

obtained by calling the Department of

Labor, Departmental Clearance Officer,

Todd R. Owen ((202) 219–5096 ext. 143)

or by E-Mail to Owen-Todd@dol.gov.

Comments should be sent to Office of

Information and Regulatory Affairs,

Attn: OMB Desk Officer for BLS, DM,

ESA, ETA, MSHA, OSHA, PWBA, or

VETS, Office of Management and

Budget, Room 10235, Washington, DC

20503 ((202) 395–7316), within 30 days

from the date of this publication in the

Federal Register.

The OMB is particularly interested in

comments which:

• evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the agency, including

whether the information will have

practical utility;

• evaluate the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;

• enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

• minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

are to respond, including through the

use of appropriate automated,

electronic, mechanical, or other

technological collection techniques or

other forms of information technology,

e.g., permitting electronic submission of

responses.

Agency: Employment and Training

Administration.

Title: Work Opportunity Tax Credit

(WOTC).

OMB Number: 1205–0371 (extension).

Form Number: ETA 9057–59, 9061–63

and 9065.

Affected Public: State, Local or Tribal

Governments.

Form No. Frequency Respondents

Average time

per respondent

ETA 9057 ......................................................................... Quarterly ......................................................................... 52 8 hours.

ETA 9058 ......................................................................... Quarterly ......................................................................... 52 8 hours.

ETA 9059 ......................................................................... Quarterly ......................................................................... 52 8 hours.

ETA 9061–9063 and 9065 ............................................... As needed ....................................................................... 10,400 20 minutes.

Recordkeeping ................................................................. Annually .......................................................................... 52 997 hours.

Total Burden Hours: 60,303.

Total annualized capital/startup

costs: 0.

Total annual costs (operating/

maintaining systems or purchasing

services): 0.

Description: Tax Credits’ program

Implementation & Administration

contains specific program guidance to

the Designated Local Agencies/State

Employment Security Agencies for

implementing and administering a

target group eligibility determination

and processing system to issue

Certifications to all timely submitted

and qualifying employers’ requests.

Instructions for developing and

conducting verification activities to

ensure the validity and reliability of the

certification system for collecting and

reporting data on all program activities

on a quarterly basis to the Regional and

National offices. Data and information

provided by the States on the reporting

forms are used for program planning

and evaluation and for oversight or

verification activities as mandated by

the Revenue Act of 1978, Tax Equity

and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982,

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of

1992, Sections 51., and 51A Internal

Revenue System Code 1986, as

amended, Small Business Job Protection

Act of 1996 and the Taxpayer Relief Act

of 1997.
40934 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 147 / Friday, July 31, 1998 / Notices

Agency: Employment and Training

Administration.

Title: Indian and Native American

Welfare-to-Work Program—Report

Forms and Instructions.

OMB Number: 1205–0386 (extension).

Affected Public: State, Local or Tribal

Government.

Form No.

Respondents

Frequency

Average

time per

response

(hours)

ETA 9069 .... 85 4 9

ETA 9069–1 85 4 9

Total Burden Hours: 4,968.

Total annualized capital/startup

costs: 0.

Total annual costs (operating/

maintaining systems or purchasing

services): 0.

Description: Extension of the approval

of the report forms and instructions

used by Indian and native American

Welfare-to-work (INA WtW) grantees is

being requested. These instructions and

forms provide eligible tribal entities

with requirements for preparing and

submitting financial expenditure and

activity reports to the Department so

that they may be in compliance with the

statutory reporting requirements of the

INA WtW program.

Agency: Employment and Training

Administration.

Title: Attestation by Employers Using

Alien Crewmembers for Longshoring

Activities in U.S. Ports.

OMB Number: 1205–0309 (extension).

Form Number: ETA 9033.

Frequency: As needed.

Affected Public: Business or other forprofit.

Number of Respondents: 1.

Total Burden Hours: 4.

Total annualized capital/startup

costs: 0.

Total annual costs (operating/

maintaining systems or purchasing

services): 0.

Description: The information

provided on this form by employers

seeking to use alien crewmembers to

perform longshore work at U.S. ports

will permit the Department to meet

Federal responsibilities for program

administration, management and

oversight.

Agency: Mine Safety and Health

Administration.

Title: Application for use of

Nonpermissible Explosives and

Nonpermissible Shot-Firing Units (30

CFR 75.1321, 75.1327, and 77.1909–1).

OMB Number: 1219–0025 (extension).

Frequency: On occasion.

Affected Public: Business or other forprofit.

Number of Respondents: 190.

Total Burden Hours: 110 hours.

Total annualized capital/startup

costs: 0.

Total annual costs (operating/

maintaining systems or purchasing

services): $755.

Description: The Application for Use

of Nonpermissible Explosives and

Nonpermissible Shot-Firing Units

contains provisions by which a coal

mine operator may apply for and be

granted a permit to use Nonpermissible

explosives and nonpermissible shotfiring units.

Todd R. Owen,

Departmental Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 98–20506 Filed 7–30–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding

Eligibility To Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA

Transitional Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the

Department of Labor herein presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for trade adjustment

assistance for workers (TA–W) issued

during the period of July, 1998.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

worker adjustment assistance to be

issued, each of the group eligibility

requirements of Section 222 of the Act

must be met.

(1) That a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, have become totally

or partially separated,

(2) That sales or production, or both,

of the firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely, and

(3) That increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have

contributed importantly to the

separations, or threat thereof, and to the

absolute decline in sales or production.

Negative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criterion (3)

has not been met. A survey of customers

indicated that increased imports did not

contribute importantly to worker

separations at the firm.

TA–W–34,371; KCS Industries, A Div. Of

Banta Corp., Milwaukee, WI

TA–W–34,628; Gilroy Canning Co.,

Gilroy, CA

TA–W–34,525; Crown Clothing Co.,

Vineland, NJ

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

TA–W–34,578; Lanier Litigation service

D.B.A. Quorum/Lanier,

Bloomington, MN

TA–W–34,593; Fruit of the Loom Inc.,

Transportation Department,

Bowling Green, KY

TA–W–34,621; Strategic Finishing, Inc.,

Tualatin, OR

The workers firm does not produce an

article as required for certification under

Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA–W–34,515 & A; Justin Boot Co.,

Carthage, MO & Sarcoxie, MO

TA–W–34,620; Weck Closure Systems,

Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC

TA–W–34,586; Star Food Processing,

Inc., Star Ranch, San Antonio, TX

TA–W–34,573; Code Alarm, Inc., Tessco

Group-Code South, Georgetown, TX

TA–W–34,644; Forest Furniture, Lapine,

OR

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

TA–W–34,673; Intercraft Co., Div., of

Newell, Statesville, NC

The investigation revealed that

criteria (2) and criteria (3) have not been

met. Sales or production did not decline

during the relevant period as required

for certification. Increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have not

contributed importantly to the

separations or threat thereof, and the

absolute decline in sales or production.

Affirmative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been

issued; the date following the company

name and location of each

determination references the impact

date for all workers of such

determination.

TA–W–34,640; Heiser Egan, Inc., New

York, NY: May 24, 1997

TA–W–34,599; JK Oprating Corp.,

Mahanoy City; PA: May 18, 1997

TA–W–34,636; McCreary Manufacturing

Co., Stearns, KY: May 28, 1997

TA–W–34,430; Alcoa Fujikura Ltd.,

Automotive Div., Del Rio, TX:

March 27, 1997

TA–W–34,577; Wausau-Mosinee Paper

Corp., Rhinelander Mill,

Rhinelander, WI: May 13, 1997