alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATIONS***
Exhibit 31.1
I, Francis I. duPont, III, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First NationalBancshares, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and wehave:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date ofthis quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and  c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):
 a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial data and have identifiedfor the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols; and
6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in thisquarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internalcontrols subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, includingany corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.   Date: November 12, 2004 /s/ *Francis I. duPont, III* Title: Principal Executive Officer
No. 11-7130.

#### In re William B. Kissane, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 1056, 132 S. Ct. 794,

181 L. Ed. 2d 509,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8374.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Date: 29 August 2022 *****************************

NSN: 8940-01-467-2222 (SMD) * MONOGRAPH: MCW/LRP 09

 *****************************

Item: Spaghetti with Meat Sauce, Cooked, Dehydrated

Document: PCR-S-008, Spaghetti with Meat Sauce, Cooked, Dehydrated, Packaged in a Stand 

Up Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 520 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Dehydrated product: Mixture of off-white to light tan thin spaghetti and medium brown 

beef pieces covered in a reddish color Italian style tomato free-flowing sauce powder 

with tomato dices and flecks of herbs and spices.

Rehydrated product: Mixture of off-white to light tan distinct strands of thin spaghetti

(may have a reddish color from the sauce), medium brown distinct beef pieces in a

glossy, semi translucent reddish color Italian style tomato sauce with tomato dices and 

flecks of herbs and spices.

Odor: Dehydrated product: Italian style tomato sauce.

Rehydrated product: Cooked spaghetti, ground beef and Italian style tomato sauce.

Flavor: Rehydrated product: Cooked spaghetti, ground beef and Italian style tomato sauce.

Texture:

Dehydrated product: No wet or soft spots indicating incomplete dehydration.

Rehydrated product: Fully rehydrated within twelve minutes, slightly soft to slightly 

firm spaghetti, moist and tender ground beef pieces, slightly thick sauce with slightly 

soft to slightly firm tomato dices.

Possible Deteriorative Changes

Appearance: Dehydrated and Rehydrated: Darkening or loss of color of spaghetti, beef, and sauce.

Odor: Dehydrated: Cardboard, oxidized, rancid, scorched, burnt, sour, fishy.

Rehydrated: Cardboard, oxidized, rancid, scorched, burnt, sour. 

Flavor: Dehydrated and Rehydrated: Cardboard, oxidized, rancid, scorched, burnt, loss of 

spice. 

Texture: Dehydrated: Very hard, tacky, crystalline beef, case hardened noodles.

Rehydrated: Unrehydrated product, chewy, dry beef, mushy spaghetti, excess water. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

N/A

Special Notes

N/A
2010 Addendum to Employment Agreement


 


THIS ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this "Addendum")
is made this 30th day of June, 2010 between Shengtai Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (the “Company”) and Qingtai
Liu (“Employee”)


 


WHEREAS, the Employee and the Company entered
into an Employment Agreement on July 8, 2009 (“Employment Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, the Company was in need of cash
flow for its operations and development and the Employee agreed to reduce his salary under Section 4 of the Employment Agreement
from $120,000 to $107,676;


 


WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to set
out the understanding reached between them in a written agreement;


 


NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES that
in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties hereto covenant and agree
as follows:


 


		1.	The annual salary of the Employee in fiscal year 2010 shall be $107,676.
	 	 	 



		2.	Except as otherwise specifically stated herein, the terms of the Employment Agreement (including
the exhibits thereto) shall remain in full force and effect.



 


-- Signature page follows
--


 






    	 



    	 	



    
 





IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.


 


 


	
        EMPLOYEE:

         

         

         

        /s/ Qingtai Liu________________________

        Qingtai Liu

         
	 	
        SHENGTAI PHARMACEUITICAL, INC.

         

         

        By:

        /s/ Qingtai Liu_______________________

        Qingtai Liu

        Chief Executive Officer
No. 10-10889.

#### Eun S. Kim, Petitioner v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, et al.

565 U.S. 1101, 132 S. Ct. 868,

181 L. Ed. 2d 566,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8884.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 855, 132 S. Ct. 186, 181 L. Ed. 2d 95, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5846.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-84,247-02

EX PARTE ADRIAN TERRELL WILSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1089706-A IN THE 262ND DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of a murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Fourteenth

Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Wilson v. State, No. 14-07-00451-CR (Tex.

App.—Houston [14th Dist], July 10, 2008) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed this

application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded

it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. 

Applicant contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and

challenge dog scent lineup testimony and evidence presented by the State. The trial court has

determined that trial counsel’s performance was deficient and that the outcome of Applicant’s jury

trial would have been different but for counsel’s performance. 
2

However, based on our independent review of the entire record, this Court finds that

Applicant has failed to meet his burden to show counsel’s performance was deficient or that his

defense was harmed by the alleged deficient conduct. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668

(1984). We deny relief.

Filed: March 31, 2021

Do not publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,391
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             225
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     40,373
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           6,739
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             6,535
<LOANS>                                        106,494
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,098
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 163,611
<DEPOSITS>                                     138,902
<SHORT-TERM>                                     3,048
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,373
<LONG-TERM>                                      5,524
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,827
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,187
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 163,611
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,196
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,300
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   198
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,694
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,552
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,778
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,916
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       65
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  34
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,592
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    947
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         629
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       629
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.34
<LOANS-NON>                                        134
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,070
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       40
<RECOVERIES>                                         3
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,098
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,098
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,071


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 347 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 347

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2019

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To extend the authorization of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation 
   Control Act of 1978 relating to the disposal site in Mesa County, 
                               Colorado.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Responsible Disposal Reauthorization 
Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION.

    Section 112(a)(1)(B) of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control 
Act of 1978 (42 U.S.C. 7922(a)(1)(B)) is amended by striking 
``September 30, 2023'' and inserting ``September 30, 2031''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3564 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3564

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate the Optional 
          Practical Training Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 27, 2019

  Mr. Gosar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate the Optional 
          Practical Training Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fairness for High-Skilled Americans 
Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATING THE OPTIONAL PRACTICAL TRAINING PROGRAM.

    Section 274A(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1324a) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) Employment authorization for aliens no longer engaged 
        in full-time study in the united states.--Notwithstanding any 
        other provision of law, no alien present in the United States 
        as a nonimmigrant under section 101(a)(15)(F)(i) may be 
        provided employment authorization in the United States pursuant 
        to the Optional Practical Training Program, or any such 
        successor program, without an express Act of Congress 
        authorizing such a program.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-6960.

#### Ishmael Salahuddin, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 1120, 132 S. Ct. 1015,

181 L. Ed. 2d 750,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 369.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 10-10709.

#### Edward Washington, Petitioner v. Burl Cain, Warden.

565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1077,

181 L. Ed. 2d 795,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 543.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 845, 132 S. Ct. 162, 181 L. Ed. 2d 76, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6425.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 31, 2023

NO. 03-21-00392-CR

D’Nerior Drew, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA AND JONES

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.
No. 11-7196.

#### William A. Seawright, Petitioner v. Michael McCall, Warden.

565 U.S. 1126, 132 S. Ct. 1034,

181 L. Ed. 2d 761,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 79.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 441 Fed. Appx. 970.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 12, 2016

No. 04-16-00113-CV

Richard RAMOS, Individually and D/B/A Green Energy of SA and Green Energy of San 

Antonio,

Appellants

v.

Carol BURROWS,

Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-04008

Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On March 3, 2016, appellant filed his notice of appeal. On April 7, 2016, the court 

reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this appeal filed a notification of late 

record, stating that the appellant has failed to pay the balance due for the preparation of the 

reporter’s record.

We, therefore, ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court within fourteen

days of the date of this order that the balance due on the reporter’s fee has been paid. If appellant 

fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due within thirty days from the 

date of this order, and the court will only consider those issues or points raised in appellant’s 

brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of April, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Corey
Henry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-3
(the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on
my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and
their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I
have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.



By:

/s/ Corey HenryName:

Corey HenryTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerSantander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date:

March 30, 2018
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

UNDER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (the Company) does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2017 of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 6, 2018



/s/ Eduardo AlcaroEduardo Alcaro Chief Financial and Investor
Relations Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
No. 11-5925.

#### Juan Ramon Aguilar, Petitioner v. M. S. Adams, Warden.

565 U.S. 980, 132 S. Ct. 500,

181 L. Ed. 2d 353,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7906.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3339 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3339

  To provide for the use of peer support, peer mentoring, and career 
     coaching in demonstration projects conducted under the health 
 profession opportunity grant program under section 2008 of the Social 
                             Security Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 2019

  Mr. Evans introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the use of peer support, peer mentoring, and career 
     coaching in demonstration projects conducted under the health 
 profession opportunity grant program under section 2008 of the Social 
                             Security Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mentoring and Supporting Families 
Act''.

SEC. 2. USE OF PEER SUPPORT, PEER MENTORING, AND CAREER COACHING.

    Section 2008 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1397g) is 
amended by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections (d) and 
(e), respectively, and by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
    ``(c) Use of Peer Support, Peer Mentoring, and Career Coaching.--
            ``(1) Preference in considering applications.--In 
        considering applications for a grant under this section, the 
        Secretary shall give preference to--
                    ``(A) applications that include opportunities for 
                peer support or peer mentoring, and make career 
                coaching available, as part of the case management 
                plan; and
                    ``(B) applications that include a commitment to 
                providing project participants with a monthly cash 
                stipend equivalent to 50 percent of the Federal poverty 
                level.
            ``(2) Inclusion among support services.--A project for 
        which a grant is made under this section shall include case 
        management plans that include career coaching (with the option 
        to offer appropriate peer support and mentoring opportunities 
        to help develop soft skills and social capital), which may be 
        offered on an ongoing basis before, during, and after initial 
        training as part of a career pathway model.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by this Act shall take effect on October 1, 
2019.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-37.

#### Alfredo De Pina Silas Monteiro, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

565 U.S. 1014, 132 S. Ct. 549,

181 L. Ed. 2d 396,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8071.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.