alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4658 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit former Members of 

Congress from engaging in certain lobbying activities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2006 

Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit former 

Members of Congress from engaging in certain lobbying 

activities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON LOBBYING BY FORMER MEM4 BERS OF CONGRESS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 207(e) of title 18, United 

6 States Code, is amended by striking paragraph (1) and 

7 inserting the following: 

8 ‘‘(1) MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND ELECTED

9 OFFICERS.— 
2 

•HR 4658 IH 

1 ‘‘(A) MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.—(i) Any 

2 person who is a Member of Congress and who, 

3 after that person leaves office, knowingly 

4 makes, with the intent to influence, any com5 munication to or appearance before any of the 

6 persons described in clause (ii), on behalf of 

7 any other person (except the United States) in 

8 connection with any matter on which such 

9 former Member of Congress seeks action by a 

10 Member, officer, or employee of either House of 

11 Congress, in his or her official capacity, shall be 

12 punished as provided in section 216 of this title. 

13 ‘‘(ii) The persons referred to in clause (i) 

14 with respect to appearances or communications 

15 by a former Member of Congress are any Mem16 ber, officer, or employee of either House of 

17 Congress, and any employee of any other legis18 lative office of the Congress. 

19 ‘‘(B) ELECTED OFFICERS.—(i) Any person 

20 who is an elected officer of either House of 

21 Congress and who, within 1 year after that per22 son leaves office, knowingly makes, with the in23 tent to influence, any communication to or ap24 pearance before any of the persons described in 

25 clause (ii), on behalf of any other person (ex-
3 

•HR 4658 IH 

1 cept the United States) in connection with any 

2 matter on which such former Member of Con3 gress or elected officer seeks action by a Mem4 ber, officer, or employee of either House of 

5 Congress, in his or her official capacity, shall be 

6 punished as provided in section 216 of this title. 

7 ‘‘(ii) The persons referred to in clause (i) 

8 with respect to appearances or communications 

9 by a former elected officer are any Member, of10 ficer, or employee of the House of Congress in 

11 which the elected officer served.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

13 subsection (a)— 

14 (1) shall apply only to persons whose service as 

15 a Member of Congress terminates on or after the 

16 date of the enactment of this Act; and 

17 (2) shall apply to elected officers of either 

18 House of Congress as if such amendment were in ef19 fect on the day before such date of enactment. 

Æ
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Dice Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael P. Durney, Senior Vice
President, Finance, CFO and Treasurer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, certify that:





| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|
|

| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Dated: October 24, 2002





/s/    MICHAEL P. DURNEYMichael P. Durney Senior Vice
President, Finance, CFO & Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
No. 11-5571.

#### Teresa Polite, Petitioner v. Arkansas Department of Correction.

565 U.S. 1076, 132 S. Ct. 807,

181 L. Ed. 2d 518,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8448.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 914, 132 S. Ct. 329, 181 L. Ed. 2d 205, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6216.
1 February 2013 *********************************

NSN: 8935-01-613-1358 (CRS) *MONOGRAPH NO: MCW/LRP 31

*********************************

Item: Soup, Noodle, Ramen, Instant, Fried noodle, Cup/bowl, Chicken flavor, Reduced sodium, 

Flat interlocking closure pouch (Type I, Style A, Flavor 2, Class b, Design B)

Document: CID A-A-20297, Soup, Noodle, Ramen, Instant and PKG&QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 275 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Dehydrated: Free flowing soup base with color typical of the flavor specified. Dry 

noodles, by weight, compose less than 86 percent of the contents of the pouch.

Reconstituted: Lightly colored and slightly curly noodles, clear to semi-opaque broth 

free of lumps or undissolved particles (other than spices). Bright in color vegetables. If 

present, textured soy protein or textured soy flour resemble meat-like pieces with an 

appearance appropriate to the flavor specified.

Odor: Typical of flavor specified.

Flavor: Typical of flavor specified.

Texture:

Reconstituted: Soft, elastic, and not mushy ramen noodles. Fully rehydrated, slightly 

soft, and tender vegetables. If present, textured soy protein or textured soy flour pieces 

are tender and meat-like.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkened, clumped soup base.

Odor: Oxidized, rancid.

Flavor: Oxidized, rancid, stale.

Texture: Noodles may be hard and not readily rehydrate.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Product should be exampled in its dehydrated state first then evaluated as a reconstituted product. 

This product should contain an oxygen scavenger packet.
1 February 201

3 *********************************

NSN: 8935-01-613-1358 (CRS)*MONOGRAPH NO: MCW/LRP 31

*********************************

Special Notes

NA
5 December 2013 **********************************

NSN: 8940-01-523-0786 (MMM) * MONOGRAPH NO: MCW/LRP 62A

 ***********************************

Item: Nuts and raisins with pan coated chocolate disks (Type II)

Document: PCR-N-003, Nut and Fruit Mix, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 370 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Free flowing mixture of nuts (coated peanuts, coated walnuts, almonds, filberts), 

coated raisins, and pan coated chocolate disks. Free of clumped ingredients that cannot 

be broken with light finger pressure. Pan coated chocolate disks have a high gloss 

candy shell and a double-convex lens shape.

Odor: Unsalted, shelled, roasted peanuts, walnuts, almonds, filberts, raisins and sweet milk 

chocolate.

Flavor: Unsalted, shelled, roasted peanuts, walnuts, almonds, filberts, raisins and sweet milk 

chocolate.

Texture: Firm to crunchy nuts; moist, chewy raisins; pan coated chocolate disks of such 

hardness that they cannot be easily crushed or cracked.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: All components darkened or clumped together. Nuts and pan coated disks crushed or 

broken.

Odor: Stale, rancid nuts or pan coated disks.

Flavor: Stale, rancid nuts or pan coated disks.

Texture: Soft nuts; dry, hard raisins; hard, cracked/broken pan coated disks.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Product is considered serviceable if clumps of nuts, raisins, and pan coated chocolate disks can be 

broken with light finger pressure.

Special Notes

This product pouch shall be nitrogen flushed or contain an oxygen scavenger. If defect such as 

oxidized or rancid odors or flavors exist, they are likely due to package failure or the absence of an 

oxygen scavenger. There may be some loose and/or detached skins and peanut splits.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS***
I, Kenneth J. Cichocki, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Home Interiors &Gifts, Inc. (the “Registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the Registrant andhave:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls or procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on suchevaluation; c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theRegistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to affect, the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, tothe Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: August 12, 2004    /s/ KENNETH J. CICHOCKI  Kenneth J. Cichocki Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS

(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

I, A. Dwight Utz, certify that, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by ECB Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the period presented therein.



|                      |  |  |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ A. Dwight Utz                    
|                      |  |  |  | A. Dwight Utz                        
|                      |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



43
No. 11-7899.

#### Regnaldo Vargas-Mendoza, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1172, 132 S. Ct. 1130,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1006,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 614.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 450 Fed. Appx. 588.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 148 (Monday, August 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41302-41303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20599]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, Subcommittee Meeting on 
Reliability and Probabilistic Risk Assessment; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Reliability and Probabilistic Risk 
Assessment will hold a meeting on August 26, 1998, Room T-2B3, 11545 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:
    Wednesday, August 26, 1998--10:00 a.m. until the conclusion of 
business
    The Subcommittee will discuss issues in the Staff Requirements 
Memorandum dated April 20, 1998, regarding situation-specific cases 
where probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) results and insights have 
improved the existing regulatory system and specific areas in which 
PRA, when applied properly, can have a positive impact on the 
regulatory system. The purpose of this meeting is to gather 
information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and to formulate 
proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the 
full Committee.
    Oral statements may be presented by members of the public with the 
concurrence of the Subcommittee Chairman; written statements will be 
accepted and made available to the Committee. Electronic recordings 
will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are 
open to the public, and questions may be asked only by members of the 
Subcommittee, its consultants, and staff. Persons desiring to make oral 
statements should notify the cognizant ACRS staff engineer named below 
five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate 
arrangements can be made.
    During the initial portion of the meeting, the Subcommittee, along 
with any of its consultants who may be present, may exchange 
preliminary views regarding matters to be considered during the balance 
of the meeting.
    The Subcommittee will then hear presentations by and hold 
discussions with representatives of the NRC staff, its consultants, and 
other interested persons regarding this review.
    Further information regarding topics to be discussed, whether the 
meeting has been canceled or rescheduled, and the Chairman's ruling on 
requests for the opportunity to present oral statements and the time 
allotted therefor can be obtained by contacting the cognizant ACRS 
staff engineer, Mr. Michael T. Markley (telephone 301/415-6885) between 
7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (EDT). Persons planning to attend this meeting 
are urged to contact the above named individual one or two working days 
prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the 
agenda, etc., that may have occurred.


[[Page 41303]]


    Dated: July 28, 1998.
Sam Duraiswamy,
Chief, Nuclear Reactors Branch.
[FR Doc. 98-20599 Filed 7-31-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3561 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3561

 To amend the Financial Stability Act of 2010 to require the Financial 
 Stability Oversight Council to consider alternative approaches before 
 determining that a U.S. nonbank financial company shall be supervised 
by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 27, 2019

      Mr. Foster (for himself, Mr. Huizenga, Mr. McAdams, and Mr. 
Hollingsworth) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Financial Stability Act of 2010 to require the Financial 
 Stability Oversight Council to consider alternative approaches before 
 determining that a U.S. nonbank financial company shall be supervised 
by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Financial Stability Oversight 
Council Improvement Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. FINANCIAL STABILITY OVERSIGHT COUNCIL.

    Section 113 of the Financial Stability Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5323) 
is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``The Council'' 
                and inserting ``Subject to paragraph (3), the 
                Council''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Initial determination.--The Council may not vote on a 
        proposed determination with respect to a U.S. nonbank financial 
        company under paragraph (1) unless the Council first 
        determines, in consultation with the company and the primary 
        financial regulatory agency with respect to the company, that a 
        different action by the Council or the agency (including the 
        application of new or heightened standards and safeguards under 
        section 120), or by the company under a written plan that is 
        submitted promptly to the Council, is impracticable or 
        insufficient to mitigate the threat that the company could pose 
        to the financial stability of the United States.''; and
            (2) in subsection (f)(1), by striking ``subsection (e)'' 
        and inserting ``subsections (a)(3) and (e)''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-7158.

#### William Gray, Petitioner v. Phillip Valdez, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 1124, 132 S. Ct. 1030,

181 L. Ed. 2d 759,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 134,

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 11-7131.

#### John Jacques, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1085, 132 S. Ct. 828,

181 L. Ed. 2d 537,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8736.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 423 Fed. Appx. 641.
No. 11-5699.

#### Stevie Wayne Johnson, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1082,

181 L. Ed. 2d 800,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 526.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 919, 132 S. Ct. 341, 181 L. Ed. 2d 214, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6975.
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

Monograph No. BS15 

20 December 2002 

NSN: 8915-01-516-9343

Item: Potatoes, White, Dehydrated, Mashed (precooked, rapid rehydrating), Agglomerates, 

Without lumps (Type II, Style D, Option a) 

Document: CID A-A-20032F, Potatoes, White, Dehydrated 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 100 Kcal Component Classification: Primary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 24 months at 80°F 

Item Characteristics

Appearance: 

Porous random shaped agglomerated potato pieces. Shall be free of clumps and white 

to pale yellow in color. Shall be bright and free from gray to brown colors. 

Prepared: Mashed potatoes shall be uniform white to pale yellow color. Shall be 

bright in color and be free from gray and brown colors. Shall be free of clumps that do 

not fall apart under light finger pressure. 

Odor: Typical of dehydrated instant mashed potatoes. May be starchy. 

Prepared: Cooked potato odor. Free from sour, musty, rancid odors. 

Flavor: Prepared: Cooked potato flavor. Free from sour, musty, rancid odors

Texture: 

Porous, granular texture. Product shall be free flowing. Lumps should be easily broken 

up. 

Prepared: Consistency of mashed potatoes. Lumps should be easily broken. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: May darken. May contain lumps that do not fall apart under light finger pressure. 

Odor: Rancid, stale, oxidized, bitter, soapy, scorched, sour, musty or other objectionable 

odors. 

Flavor: Rancid, stale, oxidized, bitter, soapy, scorched, sour, musty or other objectionable 

flavors. 

Texture: May clump and/or may not readily attain a thick creamy mashed potato texture upon 

mixing. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Prepare as directed on label. 
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

Monograph No. BS15 

20 December 2002 

NSN: 8915-01-516-9343
No. 11-7492.

#### Michael Kokoski, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1133, 132 S. Ct. 1054,

181 L. Ed. 2d 774,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 22.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 435 Fed. Appx. 472.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 96-60226

Summary Calendar

____________________

RONALD EMERY JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KIRK FORDICE; MICHAEL MOORE;

EDDIE LUCAS, Commissioner,

 Mississippi Department of Corrections;

 EDWARD HARGETT, Superintendent,

 Mississippi State Penitentiary;

 LAWRENCE HENDERSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

__________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

( 4:94-CV-235-B-B )

__________________________________________

August 14, 1996

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ronald Emery Jones, No. 80661, a Mississippi state prisoner,

appeals the dismissal with prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

as frivolous. Jones maintains that his incarceration prior to the

determination of his direct appeal was unconstitutional. This
claim necessarily raises the invalidity of his conviction, which

Jones cannot establish and is, therefore, not cognizable under §

1983. Heck v. Humphrey, __ U.S.__, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 2372 (1994).

Jones’ contention that the district court was required to

conduct an evidentiary hearing before modifying the magistrate

judge’s report in order to add additional findings is without

merit. The district court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole

or in part, the findings made by the magistrate judge. See Archie

v. Christian, 808 F.2d 1132, 1135 (5th Cir. 1987) (en banc).

Jones asserts also that the delay of over two years in

adjudicating his direct appeal is in itself violative of due

process, and he seeks damages. His inability to demonstrate any

prejudice resulting from the delay undermines any such claim. See,

e.g. United States v. Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1569 (5th Cir. 1994),

cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 115 S. Ct. 1113 (1995).

Jones’ motion to supplement his appellate brief is DENIED, and

the judgment is 

AFFIRMED.