alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION**





In
      connection with the periodic report of Infosmart Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Po Nei Sze, Chief Financial Officer
      (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, hereby certify
      as
      of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350
      of
      the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.





Date:
                May 20, 2008
            /s/
                Po Nei SzePo
                Nei SzeChief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)
FLED IN 

### BHCOURT OF APPEALS 

## ?gi5 m u pm 15 53



## USA MAT XERK

No; 05-14-01371-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF TEXAS KEITH WAGNOR APPELLANT VS DALLAS TEXAS ETAL APPELLEES ON AN APPEAL FRON THE 298th DISTRICT COURT COURT OF

DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLANTS 2nd MOTION FOR TIME TO FILE HIS BRIEF

APPELLANT SHOWS THE FOLLOWING: APPELLANT SHOWS HE CONTINUES TO SUFFER THE AFTER AFFECTS OF HIS RECENT HEART ATTACKAND HAS BEEN WITHOUT RESOURCES TO FILE HIS BRIEF, HOWEVER THE APPELLANT HAS NOW BEEN ABLE TO GO TO THE LAW LIBRARYAND SHEPPARDISE THE NEW ISSUES RAISED IN THE APPELLES BRIEF WHICH WAS FILED PRIOR TO THE FILING OF THE APPELLANT'S BRIEF.

### APPELLANTWILL SHOW THAT MOST OF THE APPELLANTS INCLUDING THE 

### APPELLANT'S MOTHER GERTRUDE WAGONER ARE DECEASED AND CAN NOT RESPOND TO THEALLEGATIONS BROUGHT BY THE THEAPPELLEES IN THEIR ORGINAL PETITIONAND THEEFORE AS THE ONLY LIVING TRUE HEIR TO THE ESTATE THE APPELLANT MUST PROCEED PRO SE. APPELLANT FEELS IF GIVEN 20 

### ADDITIONAL DAYS TO PREPARE HISBRIEF HIS CASE WILL PREVAILBEFORE THIS COURT IN A TIMELY MANNER IN THE FUTURE. 

### APPELLANT'S APPEAL IS NECESSARY TO SAVE HISMOTHER'S HOME WHICH WAS LEFT TO THE APPELLANT. PRAYER 

### APPELLANT PRAYS THIS COURTWILL GRANT HIM 20 DAYS TO FINISH PREPARING HIS BRIEFAND FILING ITWITH THE COURT. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED KEITH WAGONER PRO SE .LANT 

# JS W AQ^^^E^TIFICATEOFSERVICE CERTIFY THATA TRUEAND CORRECT COPY OF THE FOREGOING INSTRUEMENT WAS SERVED ON THE APPELLES BY U.S. MAIL AND FAX ON THIS 27TM DAY OF AUGUST 2015. WAGONER PRO SE 

# <r 

# fe^*
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE


INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT


 


This amendment (“Amendment”) is effective as of the date signed by Steel Excel Inc. (formerly ADPT Corporation) and amends that certain Independent Contractor Agreement, dated February 2, 2010, as amended (the “Agreement”), between Steel Excel Inc. and John J. Quicke (“Contractor”).  Unless expressly stated to the contrary herein, all capitalized terms in this Amendment shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.


 



	
I.

	
The name of the contracting party ADPT Corporation is changed to Steel Excel Inc.







 



	
II.

	
The term of the Agreement is hereby extended for another one (1) year term covering the period of January 3, 2012 to January 3, 2013.







 



	
III.

	
Exhibit A is amended by removing the Anticipated Ending Date of December 31, 2011 in line (b), and replacing it with December 31, 2012.







 


Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.  This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one instrument.


 


IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representative as of the date set forth below.


 



	
STEEL EXCEL INC.

	  	
JOHN J. QUICKE


	  	  	  
	
/s/ Mark Zorko

	  	
/s/ John J. Quicke


	
Authorized Signature

	  	
Authorized Signature


	  	  	  
	
Mark Zorko

	  	
John J. Quicke


	
Printed Name

	  	
Printed Name


	  	  	  
	
Chief Financial Officer

	  	  
	
Title

	  	
Title


	  	  	  
	
April 3, 2012

	  	April 1, 2012
	
Date

	  	
Date
OUTSIDE TINPLATE OR COATING (WHEN REQUIRED) 

Table IV, Defect No. 203, Minor defect. Enamel missing – flaked.
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

### Water Analysis Form REP-703 Rev. 1, 11/2013



### Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 3/31/2014 Sample Number: 140928-001 Date Collected:03/18/2014 08:30 Date Received:3/18/2014 

### Clearwater Pond at Weir Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 46.5 2 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 0.8 03/26/2014 

### Sample Number: 140928-002 Date Collected: 03/18/2014 08:35 Date Received:3/18/2014 

### Recirculation Pond Outlet at Weir Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 1 2 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 0.8 03/26/2014 J 

### Sample Number: 140928-003 Date Collected:03/18/2014 08:35 Date Received:3/18/2014 

### FGD Landfill Discharge to Pond Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 389 50 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 20 03/26/2014 

### Sample Number: 140928-004 Date Collected: 03/18/2014 08:59 Date Received:3/18/2014 

### WWTP Outlet Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 543 50 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 20 03/26/2014 

### Sample Number: 140928-005 Date Collected:03/18/2014 08:54 Date Received:3/18/2014 

## Secondary Clarifier Outlet B Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 505 20 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 8 03/26/2014 

### Sample Number: 140928-006 Date Collected: 03/18/2014 08:53 Date Received:3/18/2014 

### Secondary Clarifier Outlet A Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 538 20 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 8 03/26/2014 

### Sample Number: 140928-007 Date Collected:03/18/2014 09:01 Date Received:3/18/2014 

## Primary Clarifier Outlet B Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 3240 50 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 20 03/26/2014 Amos Plant, 140928 Page 1 of 2

### Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 3/31/2014 Sample Number: 140928-008 Date Collected:03/18/2014 09:04 Date Received:3/18/2014 

### WWTP Inlet Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 303000 10000 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 4000 03/26/2014

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit. Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Amos Plant, 140928 Page 2 of 2
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4647 

To amend the USA PATRIOT ACT to extend the sunset of certain provisions 

of such Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 22, 2005 

Mr. SENSENBRENNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Select Committee on 

Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

DECEMBER 22, 2005 

The Committees on the Judiciary and the Permanent Select Committee on 

Intelligence discharged; considered and passed 

A BILL 

To amend the USA PATRIOT ACT to extend the sunset 

of certain provisions of such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE 

4 USA PATRIOT ACT. 

5 Section 224(a) of the Uniting and Strengthening 

6 America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to 

7 Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) 
2 

•HR 4647 CPH 

1 Act of 2001 (Public Law 107–56; 115 Stat. 295) is 

2 amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2005’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘February 3, 2006’’. 

Æ
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 

LEVY CCIUNTY, FLORIDA 

GOVERNMENT 

SERVING 

CITIZENS 

John Meeks Rock Meeks Mike Joyner Lilly Rooks Danny Stevens 

District I District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 

.._ 

July 14, 2015 

US Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC, 20590 

To Whom It May Concern, 

I support the Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act 2012 submitted 

by local business DeBerry Marketing Services, LLC. 

Specifically, given my position as Chairman of the Board for the Levy County Board of 

County Commissioners, and close workings with local public safety departments and 

agencies, I can see the benefits of utilizing a UAS in lieu of a manned aircraft as it 

relates to public safety. It is feasible that this exemption could allow local 

businesses like DeBerry Marketing Services, LLC, working with related county 

departments, to more quickly, safely, and cost effectively assist with intelligence 

and inspection aspects of fire department, forestry, and sheriff office operations; 

among others. 

Additionally, as we are in beautiful rural north Florida, natural springs, landscapes, 

and waterways are a large potential attraction for tourism for our area which is an 

important component to our local economy. Having this exemption could allow 

local businesses like DeBerry Marketing Services, LLC to assist in tourism-related 

promotional efforts while also greatly reducing the potential for environmental 

impact as compared to similar operations conducted with manned aircraft of greater 

proportions, carrying a crew and flammable fuel. 

I offer my support and are hopeftil of your granting exemption to this local petitioner. 

.~~ • `~ 

Chairman, John Meeks. 

P.O. Box 310 Bronson Florida 32621 

Telephone (352) 486-5218 Fax (352) 486-5167 

e-mail: levybocc@ ev c~ ~.~org Website: Levycounty.org
No. 11-7588.

#### Juan Antonio Vazquez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1149, 132 S. Ct. 1062,

181 L. Ed. 2d 793,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 521.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 741.
No. 11-5384.

#### Eric C. Jacobson and Eric Johnson, Petitioners v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al.

565 U.S. 1080, 132 S. Ct. 814,

181 L. Ed. 2d 528,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8735,

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-41491

Summary Calendar

 

RUBEN PASTRANA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-97-CV-216

--------------------

November 20, 2001

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ruben Pastrana appeals the dismissal of his complaint for

damages filed pursuant to the Federal Torts Claims Act. Pastrana

contends that the magistrate judge clearly erred in finding that

the arrest occurred on June 29, 1995. He asserts that this

finding affected the magistrate judge’s conclusion that Pastrana

was not entitled to relief on his claim that he was not given

meals for two days while in custody. Pastrana contends also that
No. 99-41491

-2-

the magistrate judge abused his discretion by denying counsel’s

motions to withdraw and for a continuance.

The record demonstrates that the error in the recitation of

the date of Pastrana’s arrest was merely a mistake that caused

the record to fail to reflect what was intended at the time of

trial and did not affect Pastrana’s substantial rights. We will

not re-evaluate the magistrate judge’s credibility determination. 

Glass v. Petro-Tex Chemical Corp., 757 F.2d 1554, 1559 (5th Cir.

1985). 

Pastrana has not shown that the magistrate judge’s decision

on the motions to withdraw and for a continuance was an abuse of

discretion. See United States v. Wild, 92 F.3d 304, 306 (5th

Cir. 1996); United States v. Davis, 61 F.3d 291, 298 (5th Cir.

1995). 

Pastrana has abandoned his claims that he was treated

roughly during his arrest and that he was denied requested

medical treatment by failing to assert them in this court. See

Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744,

748 (5th Cir. 1987) (issues not asserted on appeal are

abandoned).

Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED.
No. 11-5877.

#### Tony Hawk, Petitioner v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security.

565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1082,

181 L. Ed. 2d 801,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 481.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 924, 132 S. Ct. 354, 181 L. Ed. 2d 223, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7100.
Packaging Webinar

Email this event to me @

Invalid Email Address!Invalid Email Address!

Start Date/Time:

Tuesday, August 13, 2024 2:00 PM

End Date/Time:

Tuesday, August 13, 2024 3:00 PM

Recurring Event:

One time event

Importance:

Normal Priority

Location:

Virtual/Online

Description:

A DLA packaging overview webinar includes packaging requirements, military markings, and more.

Registration must be made in advance at: https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJIscumtrzMoHlRrolYADaOzYHpSDC2gi5U

Enrolled Users:

Alandra Jones

                - Return
                - 
                - Export
No. 11-7219.

#### Jeffrey Daniel Greer, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1086, 132 S. Ct. 834,

181 L. Ed. 2d 540,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8704.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 640 F.3d 1011.
No. 11-6679.

#### Beverly Ann Cash, Petitioner v. Louisiana.

565 U.S. 1082, 132 S. Ct. 820,

181 L. Ed. 2d 531,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8683,

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 439 Fed. Appx. 390.
No. 11-7736.

#### John Western Thomas, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1168, 132 S. Ct. 1118,

181 L. Ed. 2d 999,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 624.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 10-1016.

#### Daniel Coleman, Petitioner v. Court of Appeals of Maryland, et al.

565 U.S. 1091, 132 S. Ct. 865,

181 L. Ed. 2d 546,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8897.

December 12, 2011.

Motion of Senator Tom Harkin, et al. for leave to participate *547in oral argument as amici curiae and for divided argument denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>



<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          68,425
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  298,761
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          79,605
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 927,958
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        190,680
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           214
<OTHER-SE>                                     440,333
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   927,958
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               642,514
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  584,676
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,525
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,417
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,896
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,413
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,483
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05







</TABLE>
No. 11-6887.

#### Timothy Charley, aka Timothy L. Charley, Petitioner v. Orangeburg County Sheriff's Department, et al.

565 U.S. 1118, 132 S. Ct. 1011,

181 L. Ed. 2d 748,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 338,

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 445 Fed. Appx. 631.
No. 11-7707.

#### Christopher Rondell Rogers, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1138, 132 S. Ct. 1070,

181 L. Ed. 2d 784,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 435.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 445 Fed. Appx. 644.
No. 11-628.

#### Rosemary Susko, dba Rosemont Manor, Petitioner v. City of Weirton, West Virginia, et al.

565 U.S. 1179, 132 S. Ct. 1145,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1019,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1006.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 443 Fed. Appx. 805.
First Amendment to Change in Control Agreement



 Exhibit 10.39 
 EXECUTION COPY 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO CHANGE
IN CONTROL AGREEMENT 
 This First Amendment to the Change in Control Agreement, dated February 6,
2012, is entered into by and between MAP Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Company”), and Thomas A. Armer, Ph.D (“Executive”). 

WHEREAS, Executive and the Company entered into that certain Change in Control Agreement effective September 12,
2007 (the “Change in Control Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, Executive and the Company have mutually
agreed that it is in their best interest to amend the Change in Control Agreement pursuant to the terms set forth herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto do hereby agree that,
effective as of the date hereof, the Change in Control Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 

1.      Effective as of the date hereof, Subsection (iv) of the definition of “Good Reason”
contained in Section 1(d) of the Change in Control Agreement shall be replaced and amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
 (iv) the assignment to Executive of any duties or responsibilities that results in any diminution or adverse change of Executive’s position, status, circumstances of employment or scope of
responsibilities; 
 2.      Except as hereby specifically amended or modified, the terms of the Change
in Control Agreement, as amended by this First Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect. This First Amendment may be executed by the parties hereto in two counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall
constitute one and the same agreement. This First Amendment shall be governed in all respects by the laws of the State of California, without regard to the principles conflicts of laws. 

[signature page follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this
First Amendment to the Change in Control Agreement as of the day and year first above written. 
  

	
	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	 /s/ Thomas A. Armer

	Thomas A. Armer, Ph.D


  

					
	MAP PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
		
	BY:	 	/s/ Timothy S. Nelson
		 	NAME:	 	Timothy S. Nelson
		 	TITLE:	 	President and CEO


  
 2
No. 11-306.

#### Alex Zakharia, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 945, 132 S. Ct. 435,

181 L. Ed. 2d 262,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7451.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 414.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 4

1

DIC FF1/FF2/GF1/GF2 FORMAT

BILLING FOR DOD DEPENDENT SCHOOL SUPPLIES

Field Legend Position(s) Entry and Instructions

DI Code 1-3 Enter 

FF1 or GF1 (charge)

FF2 or GF2 (credit).

RI Code 4-6 Enter the RI code of the billing office.

Sales Price Condition 

Code

7 Enter applicable code or leave blank.

Contract Number 8-18 Enter in positions:

08-14 The last 7 positions of the PIIN

15-18 The Supplemental PIIN

Blank 19 Leave blank.

Port of Embarkation 

Code

20-22 Enter applicable POE code or leave 

blank.

U/I Code 23-24 Enter U/I.

Quantity 25-29 Enter the quantity billed or credited.

Document Number 30-43 Perpetuate from the MILSTRIP 

requisition.

Suffix 44 Perpetuate from the MILSTRIP shipment 

status or equivalent document.

Supplementary Address 45-50 Perpetuate from the MILSTRIP 

requisition.

Signal Code 51 Perpetuate from the MILSTRIP 

requisition.

Fund Code 52-53 Perpetuate from the MILSTRIP 

requisition.

Bill Number 54-58 Enter bill number from SBR.

Blank 59 Leave blank.

Type of Bill Code 60-61 Enter a type of bill code or leave blank.

Day of Year 62-64 Enter the day item dropped from 

inventory.
DLM 4000.25, Volume 4

2

Field Legend Position(s) Entry and Instructions

Amount 65-73 Enter the extended amount e.g., unit price 

times quantity.

65-71 Dollars

72-73 Cents

Unit Price 74-80 Enter the contract unit price plus 

applicable surcharges.

74-78 Dollars

79-80 Cents
No. 11-7913.

#### Kelvin Darnell Wade, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1173, 132 S. Ct. 1131,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1007,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 646.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 11-6091.

#### Manuel Perez, Petitioner v. William Lee, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility.

565 U.S. 984, 132 S. Ct. 511,

181 L. Ed. 2d 360,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7838.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
No. 11-6867.

#### Donald W. Crawford, Petitioner v. Jesse L. Davis, et al.

565 U.S. 1118, 132 S. Ct. 1010,

181 L. Ed. 2d 747,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 165.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, denied.