alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

SigmaRenoPro, Inc.

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

Section 906 Certifications



In connection with the Annual Report of SigmaRenoPro,Inc.,
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2023 (the “Report”) I, the Chief Financial Officer of
the Company certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:



(1)The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



This Certification is signed on November 30,
2023.



|SigmaRenoPro, Inc.                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                    
|By: /s/ Ronald Jones                                                                                                
|Ronald Jones,                                                                                                       
|Chief Financial Officer, (principal executive officer, principal accounting officer and principal financial officer)





A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to SIGMARENOPRO, INC. and will be retained by SIGMARENOPRO, INC. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The forgoing certification is being furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604 Before MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

No. 10-3028 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff-Appellee , Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. v. No. 03 CR 621-5 ERICK MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant
. Amy J. St. Eve, Judge
. ORDER The slip opinion of June 16, 2011, is amended as follows: Page 8, first full paragraph, line 1, “him” is deleted.
18 June 2015 ********************

NSN: 8940-01-645-0297 (EMT) * MONOGRAPH M20

 ******************** 

Item: Elbow Macaroni in Tomato Sauce

Document: PCR-E-019, Elbow Macaroni in Tomato Sauce, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf 

Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 240 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Uniform mixture of elbow macaroni in tomato sauce.

Elbow macaroni: Whole grain pasta product, elbow shaped macaroni not less than 3⁄4 

inch and not greater than 1-1/2 inches in length, intact, medium tan color.

Sauce: Medium reddish-orange color, with visible flecks of herbs and spices and may 

contain pieces of diced tomato.

Odor: Cooked whole grain pasta in a mild garlic and onion seasoned tomato sauce.

Flavor: Cooked whole grain pasta in a mild garlic and onion seasoned tomato sauce.

Texture: Elbow macaroni: Slightly soft to slightly firm, not pasty.

Sauce: Slightly thin to moderately thick, free flowing.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance:

Pasta: Broken or mushy, darkened or discolored. 

Sauce: Darkened, excessively thin or thick.

Odor: Scorched, bitter, acidic, sour, oxidized tomato.

Flavor: Scorched, bitter, acidic, sour, oxidized tomato. Excessive loss of spice or tomato 

flavor.

Texture: Pasta: Excessively soft, mushy or pasty. 

Sauce: Excessively thin or thick.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

NA
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force

          - [Docket ID USAF-2008-0063]

# AGENCY:

Department of the Air Force, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice to Delete a System of Records.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Air Force proposes to delete a system of records notice in its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

# DATES:

The changes will be effective on March 9, 2009 unless comments are received that would result in a contrary determination.

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to the Air Force Privacy Act Officer, Office of Warfighting Integration and Chief Information Officer, SAF/XCISI, 1800 Air Force Pentagon, Suite 220, Washington, DC 20330-1800.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Kenneth Brodie at (703) 696-7557.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Department of the Air Force systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and are available from the address above.                

The Department of the Air Force proposes to delete a system of records notice in its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or altered system report.

Dated: December 30, 2008.

Patricia L. Toppings,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

## F036 AFPC O

### SYSTEM NAME:

Aviation Service Historical Data File (June 11, 1997, 62 FR 31793).

### REASON:

This is a duplicate system that was integrated with F011 AF XO A, Aviation Resource Management System (ARMS) (December 26, 2002, 67 FR 78777). There should be only one system for historical Aviation Service Records.

 [FR Doc. E9-40 Filed 1-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report of Infosmart Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the three months period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Parker Seto, Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify
as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.




Date:
      May 18, 2009
              
              /s/ Parker SetoParker
      SetoChief
      Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 24

- 00244

- CR Manuel Becerril ESPINOZA , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 399th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2023CR5174 Honorable Andrew Carruthers , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Beth Watkins , Justice Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice Delivered and Filed: May 8, 2024
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION On March 20, 2024, appellant filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record, which was filed on April 2, 2024, does not conta in a judgment of conviction or other appealable order. Additionally, the clerk’s record appears to show that appellant has not yet been tried or sentenced in this case because he has been found incompetent to stand trial. 1

1 The most recent order in the clerk’s record is an August 10, 2023 Agreed Judgment of Incompetency. On February 21, 2024, we dismissed appellant’s appeal from that order for want of jurisdiction. See Espinoza v. State , No. 04

- 24

- 00017

- CR, 2024 WL 697100, at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Feb. 21, 2024, no pet.) (per curiam) ( mem. op., not designated for publication).04

- 24

- 00244

- CR

- 2

- Generally, a criminal defendant may only appeal from a final judgment of conviction. See
T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC

. A NN . art. 44.02; State v. Sellers , 790 S.W.2d 316, 321 n.4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990). Because no final judgment of conviction has been signed in this case, it appears the ruling, if any, appellant seeks to challenge is interlocutory. The courts of appeals lack jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law. Ragston
v. State , 424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). On April 4, 2024, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing by April 19, 2024 why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant did not respond to our order. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See id

. at 50

– 52.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
No. 11-5295.

#### Ethan Book, Jr., Petitioner v. Richard Tobin, et al.

565 U.S. 1076, 132 S. Ct. 806,

181 L. Ed. 2d 517,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8323.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 900, 132 S. Ct. 293, 181 L. Ed. 2d 177, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5576.
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 17-02 STANDARD 15.23 17.09 3.76

Tolerance

1 1

FULL ORANGE 

LIMIT 16.09 18.16 5.16 0.86 1.07 1.40 1.66

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

Shade Number MAROON 1560 Piece/Roll Number 17-02

DLA/AIR FORCE SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT April 19, 2018

Fabric Nomenclature BERET, WOOL, 100% FELT, KNITTED A-A-55184

CR/PD 01-09
No. 11-5066.

#### Juan Carlos Olvera-Rivera, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 888, 132 S. Ct. 265,

181 L. Ed. 2d 155,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5555.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 413 Fed. Appx. 71.
No. 11-6469.

#### Timothy Wayne Thompson, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 970, 132 S. Ct. 471,

181 L. Ed. 2d 307,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7564.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 426 Fed. Appx. 148.
No. 11-5515.

#### Roger Palmer, Petitioner v. Rita Buge, et al.

565 U.S. 1151, 132 S. Ct. 1081,

181 L. Ed. 2d 800,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 412.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 912, 132 S. Ct. 322, 181 L. Ed. 2d 200, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5946.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00329-CR

FRANK LARA JR.

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On appeal from the

130th District Court of Matagorda County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 13-095

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified by 

this Court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 23, 2015.
Exhibit 10.14


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT
TO AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of September 9, 2011, between VYSTAR CORPORATION, a Georgia corporation (“Vystar”),
CMA Investments, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (“CMA”) and ITALIA-EIRE LP, a Georgia limited partnership
(“I-E”).


 


WITNESSETH


 


WHEREAS, the parties
previously entered into that certain Agreement dated April 29, 2011, whereby Vystar issued a Promissory Grid Note to CMA in the
principal amount of up to $800,000 (the “Vystar Note”); and


 


WHEREAS, CMA is a party
to a Change in Terms Agreement dated the date hereof which amends that certain Business Loan Agreement among CMA, Joseph C. Allegra,
MD (“Allegra”), John D. Craft and Mitsy Y. Mangum (collectively, the “Guarantors”) and Atlantic
Capital Bank (“ACB”) (the “Loan Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the parties
hereto desire to increase the maximum principal amount of the Promissory Grid Note to $1,000,000.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for
good and valuable consideration, Vystar, CMA and I-E agree as follows:


 


1.


 


The parties hereto
agree to increase the maximum of the Promissory Grid Note to $1,000,000, effective the date hereof.


2.


 


This First Amendment
to Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Georgia.


 





IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment to Agreement as of the date first above written.


 


[Signatures on the following page]


 



    	 



    	 



    

 


	 	Vystar Corporation
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	 	William R. Doyle
	 	 	Chairman, CEO and President
	 	 	 
	 	Italia-Eire LP
	 	 	 
	 	By:	Lincoln Lee Investments, LLC
	 	 	General Partner
	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	 
	 	 	 	Joseph C. Allegra, Manager
	 	 	 
	 	CMA Investments, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	 	Joseph C. Allegra, Manager
Opinion issued March 6 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 7
- 00 8 7 8
- C R

——————————— IN RE JULIO D AVID MORALES , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION
R elator, Julio D avid Morales , p roceeding pro se and incarcerated , has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial court to rule on relator’s request for a copy of the trial court record “ up on a loaner basis” for use in preparing a post

- conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus

. 1

1 The underlying cause is The State of Texas v. Julio D avid Morales , cause number 1 0 6 4 70 6 , in the 338 th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Ramona Franklin presiding.2

W e d eny the petition.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings , Keyes , and Higley

. Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2( b).
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Christopher P. Westad, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Able Energy, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
         is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
         this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


November 14, 2003


/s/ Christopher P. Westad
---------------------------
Christopher P. Westad
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 4217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-2001]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Willamette Provincial Interagency Executive Committee (PIEC), 
Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Willamette PAC Committee will meet on Thursday, February 
19, 1998, at the Courtyard By Marriott, 3443 Hutton Street, 
Springfield, Oregon 97477; phone (541) 726-2121. The PAC Committee 
meeting is scheduled for 9:00 a.m. to approximately 3:00 p.m. The 
tentative agenda includes: (1) Riparian Reserves, (2) Update on 
Province Late-Successional Reserve Assessment, (3) Update from 
Interagency Advisory Committee Staff, (4) Decision on response to 1997 
Monitoring results, and (5) Public Forum.
    The public forum is tentatively scheduled to begin at 10:00 a.m. 
Time allotted for individual presentations will be limited to 3 
minutes. Written comments are encouraged. Written comments may be 
submitted prior to the meeting by sending them to Designated Federal 
Official Neal Forrester at the address given below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For more information regarding this 
meeting, contact Designated Federal Official Neal Forrester, Willamette 
National Forest, 211 East Seventh Avenue, Eugene, Oregon 97401; (541) 
465-6924.

    Dated: January 22, 1998.
Herbert L. Wick,
Natural Resources Staff Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-2001 Filed 1-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Docket No. FAA-2012-1070

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 5/25/2012

Regional Airline Association 5/25/2012

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 5/25/2012

ATA M Lopez 5/25/2012
Tolerance ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

TAN 525 STANDARD 58.45 5.79 15.86

1 3948A VIOLET LIMIT -2.23 -0.37 -1.23 1.28

OLIVE 527 STANDARD 51.12 -0.62 20.62

2 3948B BLUE LIMIT -1.24 0.07 -2.32 1.49

3 3948C RED LIMIT -0.44 0.77 0.03 0.79

4 3948H FULL YELLOW 

LIMIT -0.76 -0.45 2.22 1.43

DARK GREEN

528 STANDARD 39.51 -4.38 14.95

BROWN 529 STANDARD 37.63 6.33 14.97

3948D

(removed 8/8/19)

FULL ORANGE 

LIMIT -2.00 0.54 0.17 1.28

5 3948D FULL RED 

LIMIT -0.81 0.80 -0.28 1.33

6 3948F YELLOW LIMIT -0.12 0.67 1.18 0.95

Shade Number OCP Piece/Roll Number 3948

DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT April 25, 2021

Fabric Nomenclature PLAIN WEAVE, STRETCH, NYLON AND 

SPANDEX

GL/PD 06-05B

GL/PD 06-16B

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF
DARK CREAM

559 STANDARD 62.76 1.50 11.75

7 3948G FULL VIOLET 

LIMIT -2.91 0.29 -0.45 1.32

LIGHT SAGE

560 STANDARD 54.02 0.63 15.85

8 3948E FULL BLUE 

LIMIT -0.73 -0.27 -0.93 0.78

BARK BROWN

561 STANDARD 27.41 4.48 3.59

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY
No. 11-5128.

#### David Carl Wormington, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

565 U.S. 1115, 132 S. Ct. 998,

181 L. Ed. 2d 742,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 252.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
6 December 2012 *************************

NSN: 8950-00-616-5474 (MUS) *MONOGRAPH NO: M9V *

*************************

Item: Mustard, Prepared, Yellow (salad style) (Type I)

Document: A-A-20036, Mustard, Prepared and PKG&QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 5 Component Classification: ANCILLARY

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Yellow color and glossy.

Odor: Slight pungent.

Flavor: Mild mustard with slight acid taste; slight pungent.

Texture: Smooth consistency, free from coarse particles, and moderately thick.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkened, dry, syneresis.

Odor: Sour, burnt notes.

Flavor: Sour, burnt notes.

Texture: Syneresis, excessively thick and pasty.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

 

Special Notes

NA