alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7114

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WAYNE MARK BROWN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (0:98-cr-01126-JFA-8; 0:06-cv-00187-JFA) Submitted: January 25, 2007 Decided: January 29, 2007 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wayne Mark Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Wayne Mark Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny his motion to hold his appeal in abeyance and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 10-1508.

#### Azam Ansari, Petitioner v. NCS Pearson, Inc., dba Pearson VUE, et al.

565 U.S. 1031, 132 S. Ct. 572,

181 L. Ed. 2d 417,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8048.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 825, 132 S. Ct. 116, 181 L. Ed. 2d 40, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5298.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4646 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4646

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 6, 2006

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 7320 Reseda Boulevard in Reseda, California, as the ``Coach John 
                     Wooden Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 7320 
Reseda Boulevard in Reseda, California, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Coach John Wooden Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Coach John Wooden Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 5, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. 11-172.

#### Carlos E. Jean-Gilles, Petitioner v. Jacques A. Gilles.

565 U.S. 944, 132 S. Ct. 413,

181 L. Ed. 2d 259,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7373.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Eastern District, denied.

Same case below, 330 S.W.3d 538.
109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4653

AN ACT

To repeal a prohibition on the use of certain funds for 

tunneling in certain areas with respect to the Los Angeles to San Fernando Valley Metro Rail project, California.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4653 EH

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROHIBITION. 

2 The second sentence of section 321 of the Depart3 ment of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropria4 tions Act, 1986 (99 Stat. 1287) is repealed. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 20, 

2006. 

Attest:

Clerk. 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4653

AN ACT

To repeal a prohibition on the use of certain funds 

project, California.Los Angeles to San Fernando Valley Metro Rail for tunneling in certain areas with respect to the
16 October 2012 *************************

NSN: 8920-01-490-3557 (OMC) *MONOGRAPH NO: M4V*

*************************

Item: Regular Oatmeal cookies, Plain, Crisp (Type I, Style I, Flavor 1, Bake type a)

Document: CID A-A-20295, Cookies and PKG & QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 280 Component Classification: PRIMARY

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Intact and unbroken cookie. Light tan to medium brown exterior and interior crumb. 

Odor: Distinct sweet baked oatmeal. 

Flavor: Distinct sweet baked oatmeal. 

Texture: Crispy, crunchy, slightly crumbly, and with a firm bite.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkened surface and crumb. 

Odor: Stale, oxidized, rancid. 

Flavor: Stale, oxidized, rancid 

Texture: Excessively hardened (very firm, hard to bite into); crumbly. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

 

Special Notes
16 October 2012 *************************

NSN: 8920-01-490-3557 (OMC) *MONOGRAPH NO: M4V*

*************************

Serviceability is considered significantly affected if there are more than ten grams of crumbs, not discernible 

pieces, or more than three broken pieces per pouch. Serviceability is also significantly affected when a pouch 

contains three or more cookies and more than half the cookies are broken into three pieces. This product 

should contain an oxygen scavenger packet. If defects such as oxidized or rancid odors or flavors exist, they 

are likely due to package failure or the absence of an oxygen scavenger.
Date: 4 August 2017 **********************

NSN: 8940-00-782-3161 (NDC) * MONOGRAPH M9C1

 ********************** 

Item: Non-dairy Creamer, Dry

Document: CID A-A-20043 Creamer, Non-dairy, Dry

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 19-21 Component Classification: Ancillary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Dry state: White to light cream color, granular powder that is free flowing and

free of lumps (see Special Notes).

Odor: Should approximate that of commercial, spray dried, non-dairy creamer

Flavor: Should approximate that of commercial; spray dried, non-dairy creamer

Texture:

Dry state: Granular, free-flowing powder, free of lumps / caked masses (see

Special Notes). When used in coffee, it should disperse/dissolve rapidly without curdling

and with only a slight trace of melted fat on the surface.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance:

Rehydrated: Not readily dispersed or dissolved when placed in hot liquid.

Dehydrated: Darkened, lumpy or caked.

Odor: Rancid, stale.

Flavor: Rancid, stale, oxidized, bitter, soapy, tallowy.

Texture: Lumpy, clumped, caked (see Special Notes).

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Initially examine in dry state for appearance and texture; then examine in instant coffee. If product is

caked or lumped in dry state, examine the package closely for cuts; tears, holes or open seals. Inserting

a pocket flashlight inside the package while in a dark room often aids in identifying package integrity 

defects. Also shake package vigorously ten times and observe for minute quantities of product that may

sift out of package especially at the juncture of the seams and the folded edge of the package. The

defect is appropriately called a sifter. When testing in coffee, drop creamer into coffee and observe 

particle dispersion for 15 seconds; then stir coffee for 15 seconds and observe after one minute for the

defects described above.

Special Notes

Lumps that break apart under light pressure (e.g:, pressed between the fingers gently) are of no concern.
No. 10-1350.

#### In re John Hobart Zentmyer, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 813, 132 S. Ct. 394,

181 L. Ed. 2d 248,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6491.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
APP B

 DSCPM 4155.2

************************

• MONOGRAPH NO.: 3B7

************************

ITEM: YELLOW CAKE WITH CHOCOLATE CRUMB TOPING- TYPE 1 THERMOHYDROSTABLIZED,

TRAY PACK (YCC) 

NSN: 8920 01 389 2165 ITEM SPECIFICATION: MIL C 44235

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Fine grain, yellow cake with distinct chocolate crumb

topping. Color profile: Light yellow cake with chocolate brown topping. Light

to moderate brown bottom and side surfaces.

ODOR: Sweet vanilla cake with sweet chocolate topping.

FLAVOR: Sweet vanilla cake with sweet chocolate topping.

TEXTURE: Dense, moist to slightly dry cake. Crumbly topping.

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT 80 DEGREES F: 36 months

 100 DEGREES F: 6 months

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

Appearance: Product may darken (both cake and topping).

Odor: Slightly stale or slightly rancid. Slight loss of sweet vanilla

cake and/or chocolate topping.

Flavor: Slightly stale or slightly rancid. Cake may have slight vanilla

flavor loss. Chocolate flavor may become slightly bitter.

Texture: May become moderately dry.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: Can is designed to yield 18 portions cut 3

rows by 6 rows each.
No. 11-5307.

#### Elena Sturdza, Petitioner v. United Arab Emirates, et al.

565 U.S. 1076, 132 S. Ct. 806,

181 L. Ed. 2d 517,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8362.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

*518Former decision, 565 U.S. 900, 132 S. Ct. 295, 181 L. Ed. 2d 179, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5635.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SUKHDEV SINGH PANDHER,

Petitioner,

v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 16

- 72800 Agency No. A079

- 806

- 294

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted August 15, 2018 **

Before: FARRIS, BYBEE, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Sukhdev Singh Pandher, a native and ci tizen of India , petitions for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his reopened application for asylum,
withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention A gainst Torture (“CAT”).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 22 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 72800

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence
the agency’s factual findings, including its credibility findings, Chebchoub v. INS , 257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir. 2001) , and we review de novo claims of due process violations, Jiang v. Holder , 754 F.3d 733, 738 (9th Cir. 2014)

. We deny the
petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s pre - REAL ID Act adverse
credibility determination based on inconsistencies between Pandher’s testimony

and his wife’s affidavits as to his son’s whereabouts, se e Li v. Ashcroft , 378 F.3d
959, 964 (9th Cir. 2004) (“ [s]o long as one of the identified grounds is supported
by substantial evidence and goes to the hear t of [ an applicant’s ] claim of
persecution, we are bound to accept the IJ's adv erse credibility finding” (citation
omitted)), and implausibilities in Pandher’s testimony as to when and how he

learned of his son’ s detention and beating, see Don v. Gonzales , 476 F.3d 738, 743
(9th Cir. 2007) ( adverse credibility determination, based in part on implausibility
finding, supported by substantial evidence)

. In the absence of credible testimony,
in this case, Pandher’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah
v. Ashcroft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Pandher’s CAT claim also fails because it is based on the same evidence the3 16

- 72800

agency found not credible, and the record does not otherwise compel a fin ding that
it is more likely than not Pandher would be tortured if returned to India

. See
Almaghzar v. Gonzales , 457 F.3d 915, 922

- 23 (9th Cir. 2006).
Finally, w e reject Pandher ’s contention s that the IJ violated his due process
rights by failing to consider affidavits

. See Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th
Cir. 2000) (requiring error and prejudice to prevail on a due process claim). We

also reject Pandher’s contention that the IJ failed to consider other record evidence.

See Lar ita

- Martinez v. INS , 220 F.3 d 1092, 1095

- 96 (9th Cir. 2000).

PETI TION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 10.1

   
 Exhibit 10.1
 PROMISSORY NOTE
 

 

 $10,000.00
 Date:  April 3, 2012 
 

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, hereinafter referred to as "Payor", unconditionally promises to pay to the order of Jerod Edington, hereinafter referred to as "Payee or Holder", at his office located at 2009 E. 30th Ave. Spokane, WA 99203, or at such other places as the Holder hereof may designate in writing, the principal sum of $10,000.00 with no interest thereon from April 3, 2012, to maturity in 180 days on September 30, 2012.  Payment of principal and any other sum due hereunder shall be made in lawful money of the United States of America.
 Upon default by Payor in the payment of the principal amount of or any other sum due in accordance with the terms of this note, the Payee, at its option, may proceed against the Payor.  In the event of such default, the Payor agrees to pay all cost and expenses of collection, including reasonable attorney's fees and interest from the date of such default, on the principal amount unpaid, at the maximum rate permitted by law.
 Presentment and demand for payment, notice or dishonor, protest and notice of protest, are hereby waived by the Payor.  This note (i) may not be changed, waived, discharged or terminated except by an instrument in writing signed by the party against which enforcement of such change, waiver, dischargement or termination is sought and (ii) shall be binding upon Payor, its successors, assigns and transferees and shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by Payee, its successors and assigns.
 This note shall be construed and governed in all respects by the laws of the state of Nevada applicable to contracts made and to be performed therein.
 If any provisions of this note are declared invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the balance of this note shall remain in full force and effect.
 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Payor has executed this note on the day and year first written above.
 

 

 /s/ Derek Grant____________
 Name
 

 Hydrodynex, Inc.
 Company
 

 Secretary
 Title
 

 Paid in full on ________________________ 
 

 

 ___________________________________
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                Po Nei Sze          |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Po                Nei Sze              |
|   | Chief                Financial Officer |
|   | Date:                November 14, 2007 |

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6260
FELIX ORIAKHI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-97- 4200-L) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 2, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Felix Oriakhi, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order denying Appellant's motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record andthe district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Oriakhi v. United States , No. CA-97-4200-L (D. Md. Feb. 11, 1998). We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
DLA TROOP SUPPORT MANNUAL 4155.6

 DLA TROOP SUPPORT-FTRE

 Aug 2011

DLA TROOP SUPPORT MANNUAL 4155.6

TABLE OF CONTENTS (NUMERICAL)

Listed herein are the current DLA Troop Support Manual 4155.6 Subsections and 

publication dates. All future additions/deletions/changes to this Manual should be 

recorded in this Table of Contents as they are made available, so as to reflect the 

correct contents of this Manual at all times.

SECTION SUBSECTION SUBJECT DATE

101 .1 DLA TROOP SUPPORT SUBSISTENCE Jun2010

 

.2 KEY PERSONNEL ROSTER April 2010

102 .1 VALUE ENGINEERING Feb 2005

201 .1 INSPECTION PLANNING April 2010

 PLAN FOR THE

 INSPECTION JOB

202 .1 FORMATION OF LOTS April 2010

 SAMPLING PLANS April 2010

203 .1 APPLICATION OF

 SAMPLING PLANS BASED

 ON AN AVERAGE 

 REQUIREMENT

.2 COMPARABILITY April 2010

 PROCEDURES 

 FOR ATTRIBUTES

 REINSPECTION OF 

 UNREWORKED LOTS

206 .1 PRODUCTION TESTING April 2010

 PRODUCTION TESTING

 CONTRACTS

207 .1 TESTING June 2010

 GENERAL INFORMATION
.3 CONTRACTOR TESTING June 2010

.4 CERTIFICATE OF April 2010

 CONFORMANCE (COC)

.8 PACKAGING, PACKING, June 2010

 LABELING, UNITIZATION

 AND MARKING 

 (PPLU&M)

.10 SELECTING, RECEIPT AND Jun 2010

 TESTING OF SAMPLES FOR

 EVIDENCE

 209 .1 NONCONFORMANCES June 2010

 REPORTING

.

215 .5 SUSPECTED FRAUD AND June 2010

 CRIMINAL CONDUCT

.6 SUSPECTED VIOLATIONS OF June 2010

 FDA, USDA & USDC 

 REGULATIONS AND REPORTING

 REJECTIONS TO FDA, USDA & USDC

213 .1 DD FORM 1714, PRODUCT May 2010

 VERIFICATION RECORD

.2 DD FORMS 1237, REPORT OF May 2010

INSPECTION OF SHELL EGGS

.5 DD FORMS 250 and 250c, July 2010

 MATERIAL INSPECTION AND

 RECEIVING REPORTS (MIRR)

 DD FORM 250 MAIN MENU July 2010

216 .2 QUALITY HISTORY RECORDS Oct 2005

 DLA TROOP SUPPORT FORM 4275, 

 REPORT OF SAMPLING INSPECTION 

 (ATTRIBUTES)
218 .1 DESTINATION INSPECTION 29 Jul 84

 GENERAL INFORMATION

.2 ENTOMOLOGICAL LABORATORIES July 2005

IDENTIFICATION SERVICES

.7 DESTINATION VERIFICATION 23 Feb 87

 INSPECTION OF STANDARD/

 VARIABLE NET WEIGHT ITEMS

.8 DESTINATION INSPECTION OF July 2010

 SHELL EGGS

225 .1 CONTRACTOR INSPECTION July 2010

 GENERAL INFORMATION

.2 CONTRACTOR’S INSPECTION June 2001

 SYSTEM EVALUATION 

.3 INSPECTION PROCEDURES June 1988

 FOR RATION ASSEMBLY

 OPERATIONS

.6 EVALUATION OF CONTRACTOR’S 30 Jun 86

 CALIBRATION SYSTEM

227 .1 CERTIFICATION FOR EXPORT 28 Feb 86

 SHIPMENT MEAT AND MEAT 

 PRODUCTS/POULTRY AND 

 POULTRY PRODUCTS SHIPPED

 TO U.S. FORCES OVERSEAS

231 .1 INSPECTION COSTS REPORTING 29 Jan 87

 ADDITIONAL INSPECTION COSTS

232 .1 DLA QUALITY AUDIT PROGRAM 16 Jul 90

235 .1 INSPECTION OF CARRIER’S 30 Jul 90

 EQUIPMENT AT SUPPLY POINTS

 AND RECEIVING INSTALLATIONS

____________________________

This Table of Contents (Numerical) supersedes Table of Contents (Numerical), Aug 2005

Updated Aug 2011
No. 11-5300.

#### Miladin Dobric, Petitioner v. David J. Baron.

565 U.S. 1102, 132 S. Ct. 869,

181 L. Ed. 2d 567,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 9007.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 900, 132 S. Ct. 294, 181 L. Ed. 2d 178, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5649.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00183

- CR

Kristen Marie Jackson

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 1

o f Tarrant County (1272956D )

June 20, 2013

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

______________________________ ___ C hief Justice Terrie Livingston
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4674 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4674

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 3, 2006

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 110 North Chestnut Street in Olathe, Kansas, as the ``Governor John 
                 Anderson, Jr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 110 
North Chestnut Street in Olathe, Kansas, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Governor John Anderson, Jr. Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Governor John Anderson, Jr. 
Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 2, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
(1) Adjusting Price $18.09 CWT

(2) Base Price $17.67 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.42

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0361

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0181

Price change per quart $0.0090

Price change per pint $0.0045

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0034

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0028

Price change per half pint $0.0023

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.04

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.02

Price adjustment per quart $0.01

Price adjustment per pint $0.00

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Dept. of Food and Agriculture Announcement of Minimum Prices

 Effective Date: Sept. 6, 2015