alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10x1.htm


Exhibit 10.1






VENAXIS, INC.


AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED 2002 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN,


AS AMENDED


EFFECTIVE JUNE 25, 2014


 




This Amendment No. 8, dated and effective June 25, 2014 (the “Amendment”) is an amendment to the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on June 1, 2007, as amended (the “Plan”), of Venaxis, Inc., formerly known as AspenBio Pharma, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the “Company”). All capitalized terms used in this Amendment without definition have the meanings set forth in the Plan.


 




WHEREAS, Section 20(a) of the Plan authorizes the Board of Directors of the Company to make amendments to the Plan, subject to shareholder approval as required by law or agreement.




 


WHEREAS, on April 16, 2014, the Board approved an amendment to the Plan to increase the number of shares available for awards under the Plan from by 1,800,000 shares from 1,912,205 to 3,712,205 shares, and submitted the amendment to the Company’s shareholders for approval at the annual meeting of shareholders held on June 25, 2014.




WHEREAS, on June 25, 2014, the shareholders approved the foregoing amendment to the Plan.




 


NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound, and in accordance with the approvals set forth in the WHEREAS clauses, which are incorporated by reference into this Amendment, the Company amends the Plan as follows:




 


1. Section 4 of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and is replaced by the following:




 


“4. The Common Stock. The Board is authorized to appropriate, issue and sell for the purposes of the Plan, and the Option Committee is authorized to grant Options and Rights to Purchase with respect to, a total number, not in excess of 3,712,205 shares of Common Stock, either treasury or authorized but unissued or the number and kind of shares of stock or other securities which in accordance with Section 16 of this Plan shall be substituted for the 3,712,205 shares or into which such 3,712,205 shares shall be adjusted. All or any unsold shares subject to an Option or Right to Purchase that for any reason expires or otherwise terminates may again be made subject to Options or Rights to Purchase under the Plan. No person may be granted Options or Rights to Purchase under this Plan covering in excess of an aggregate of 500,000 Option Shares and shares of Restricted Stock in any calendar year, subject to adjustments in connection with Section 16 of this Plan.”




 


2. Except as amended by this Amendment, the Plan continues in full force and effect.




 


3. In the event of a conflict between this Amendment and the Plan, this Amendment shall govern.
#### Charles A. Powers, *Plaintiff in*Error, v. Southern Investment Corporation, a Corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February 2, 1926.

*Burwell <& Shipp,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Stapp <& Timing*and *M. S. Bobst,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been sub-. mitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Wi-iitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J,, concur.
No. 10-10833.

#### Anthony Dwayne Es-sett, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1058, 132 S. Ct. 755,

181 L. Ed. 2d 481,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8547,

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

I, Ashutosh Roy, the chiefexecutive officer of eGain Communications Corporation (the “Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge, 

(i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2008 (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to eGainCommunications Corporation and will be retained by eGain Communications Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 11-464.

#### Donald Rudolph Stock, Petitioner v. Montana.

565 U.S. 1093, 132 S. Ct. 850,

181 L. Ed. 2d 550,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8942.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Montana denied.

Same case below, 361 Mont. 1, 256 P.3d 899.
No. 11-7344.

#### Matthew L. Faison, Jr., Petitioner v. Thurman Weaver, et al.

565 U.S. 1153, 132 S. Ct. 1105,

181 L. Ed. 2d 973,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 700.

January 17, 2012.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
No. 11-5058.

#### Leroy P. Mitchell, Petitioner v. The Dallas Housing Authority.

565 U.S. 1062, 132 S. Ct. 757,

181 L. Ed. 2d 489,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8648,

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 409 Fed. Appx. 744.
If there were a 

vaccine against 

cancer, wouldn’t 

you get it for 

your kids?

Distributed by:

HPV vaccine is

cancer prevention. 

Talk to the doctor 

about vaccinating

your 11–12 year old

sons and daughters 

against HPV.

www.cdc.gov/vaccines/teens
# C_2016091EN.01000801.xml

| 8.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 91/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 91/8

---

Notice concerning the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China and concerning the definitive countervailing duty imposed on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China: change of name of one company subject to an individual anti-dumping duty rate and individual countervailing duty rate

(2016/C 91/06)

Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China are subject to a definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 (1) and a definitive countervailing duty imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 (2).

1

2

Years Solar Co. Ltd, TARIC (the integrated Tariff of the European Union) additional code B898, a company subject to an individual anti-dumping duty rate of 41,3 %, following Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 and to an individual countervailing duty rate of 6,4 % following Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013, informed the Commission that it had changed its name into LERRI Solar Technology (Zhejiang) Co. Ltd.

The company asked the Commission to confirm that the change of name does not affect the right of the company to benefit from the individual duty rates applied to the company under its previous name of Years Solar Co. Ltd.

The Commission has examined the information supplied and concluded that the change of name in no way affects the findings of Implementing Regulations (EU) No 1238/2013 and (EU) No 1239/2013.

Therefore, the reference in Annex I to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 and the reference in Annex 1 to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 to:

| Years Solar Co. Ltd | B898 |
| --- | --- |

Years Solar Co. Ltd

B898

should be read as:

| LERRI Solar Technology (Zhejiang) Co. Ltd | B898 |
| --- | --- |

LERRI Solar Technology (Zhejiang) Co. Ltd

B898

The TARIC additional code B898, previously attributed to Years Solar Co. Ltd shall apply to LERRI Solar Technology (Zhejiang) Co. Ltd.

---

(1)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 of 2 December 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 325, 5.12.2013, p. 1).

1

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 of 2 December 2013 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 325, 5.12.2013, p. 66).

2

---
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $7.25 CWT 0.965 $6.9963

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.5670 LB 3.5 $8.9845

Class I Price $15.9808

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $6.80 CWT 0.965 $6.5620

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.4962 LB 3.5 $8.7367

Class I Price $15.2987

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.6821

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0586

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0293

Price change per quart $0.0147

Price change per pint $0.0073

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0053

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0044

Price change per half pint $0.0037

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.06

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.03

Price adjustment per quart $0.01

Price adjustment per pint $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: Mar. 3, 2019
No. 11-6674.

#### James Lynn Styers, Petitioner v. Arizona.

565 U.S. 994, 132 S. Ct. 540,

181 L. Ed. 2d 378,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7653.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona denied.

Same case below, 227 Ariz. 186, 254 P.3d 1132.
********************************* 

* MONOGRAPH NO.: MCW/LRP 61

**************************************** 

ITEM: Candy; Pan-Coated, Chocolate Disks, Assorted Colors, Loose Packed, 1-1/2 

oz. bag, Type VI, Flavor 1 

NSN: 8925-01-008-0960 (CCD) ITEM SPECIFICATION: A-A 20177 

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE: 211 Kilocalories (PRIMARY) 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM: 

APPEARANCE: Small, sugar coated, chocolate pieces of various colors. 

ODOR: Coating: Sweet, sugary. Chocolate: Sweet, milk chocolate. 

FLAVOR: Slight sweet; vanillin, milk chocolate: 

TEXTURE: Coating: Crunchy. Chocolate: Finn, slow melting, smooth once melted. 

DEFECTS LIKELY TO OCCUR: 

APPEARANCE: Coating: Hairline cracking (like checks in fresh eggs, (see Special 

Notes). Some of the coconut oil may migrate to the surface (appears as white spots 

on surface of the coating): Chocolate:None reported to date. 

ODOR: None reported to date. 

FLAVOR: May exhibit soapy/rancid flavor but this is unlikely because of the type 

of chocolate required. 

TEXTURE: Moderately hardened to point of imparting discomfort to the user when 

chewing. 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None. 

SPECIAL NOTES: Cheelking should not be scored as a defect unless it is associated 

with texture, odor or flavor changes. Score any organoleptic changes as defects and 

note the checking in remarks: This candy is not vitamin fortified and should not 

possess a medicinal odor or flavor.
No. 11-7372.

#### Juan P. Lua-Guizar, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1129, 132 S. Ct. 1044,

181 L. Ed. 2d 768,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 109.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 656 F.3d 563.
#### Mary E. Dugan, *Appellant,*v. J. E. Powell and Carrie C. Powell, his Wife, *Appellees.*

Division B.

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

— In this case the married woman signed a contract dated August 21, 1925, without a seal opposite *1043her signature, but the contract contained a clause “In witness whereof, we have hereunto set our hands and seals.” One thousand dollars was accepted on the purchase price and time was not made of the essence of the contract. The contract may fairly have been interpreted as a practical matter to' mean that the purchaser would have thirty days from the date of the contract or fifteen days after delivery of abstract for purchaser’s attorney to examine and approve the abstract of title, before the second payment was required to be made, even if time be essential.

It is alleged that the abstract was delivered September 8, 1925, and the second payment was offered within two or three days after thirty days from the date of the contract, and two or three days after fifteen days from the delivery of the abstract.

Under these circumstances, even if Sections 3801-3 and 3953, R. G. S. require a married woman’s contract to sell land to have a seal opposite her signature to the contract and the recitation in the contract that it is under seal is not a sufficient compliance with the statute, the married woman will not be permitted to retain the substantial partial payment made and refuse to comply with her contract, therefore the bill alleges an equity for appropriate relief.

Rehearing denied.

All concur.
|                                               |        |              |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|--------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| SUBSIDIARIES OF GOLUB CAPITAL BDC 3, INC.     |
|                                          |   |         |
| Name                                          |   | Jurisdiction |
| Golub Capital 3 Holdings LLC                  |   | Delaware     |
| GBDC 3 Funding LLC                            |   | Delaware     |
| GBDC 3 Funding II LLC                         |        | Delaware     |
| GBDC 3 Quick Quack Coinvest LLC               |        | Delaware     |
| GBDC 3 Holdings ED Coinvest, Inc.             |        | Delaware     |
| GBDC 3 Holdings Coinvest, Inc.                |        | Delaware     |
| Golub Capital BDC 3 CLO 1 Depositor LLC       |        | Delaware     |
| Golub Capital BDC 3 CLO 1 LLC                 |        | Delaware     |
| GCBH 3 North Haven Stack Buyer Coinvest, Inc. |        | Delaware     |
| GBDC3F Loan Subsidiary A LLC                  |        | Delaware     |
| Golub Capital BDC 3 ABS 2022-1 LLC            |        | Delaware     |
| Golub Capital BDC 3 ABS 2022-1 Depositor LLC  |        | Delaware     |
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 149 (Tuesday, August 4, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41558-41559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20668]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-679-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

July 29, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 21, 1998, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia), 12801 Fair Lakes Parkway, Fairfax, Virginia 
22030-0146, filed in Docket No. CP98-679-000, a request pursuant to 
Section 157.205 and 157.211 of the Commission's Regulations under the 
Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 157.211) for authorization to 
construct a new delivery point to Columbia Gas of Virginia, Inc. (CGV), 
in Prince George County, Virginia, under Columbia's blanket certificate 
issued in Docket No. CP83-76-000, pursuant to 18 CFR Part 157, Subpart 
F of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request 
which is on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Columbia requests authorization to construct and operate a new 
point of delivery for firm transportation service and will provide the 
service pursuant to Columbia's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. 
CP86-240-000 under existing rate schedules and within certificated 
entitlements.
    Columbia states that the estimated quantities of natural gas to be 
delivered at the new delivery point would be 6,000 Dth per day and 
2,190,000 Dth annually. Columbia indicates that CGV requested the new 
delivery point to serve Chaparral Steel, an industrial customer.
    It is stated that the estimated cost to construct the new delivery 
point is $45,800, and that CGV would reimburse Columbia 100% of the 
total actual cost of the proposed construction.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is

[[Page 41559]]

filed within the time allowed therefor, the proposed activity shall be 
deemed to be authorized effective the day after the time allowed for 
filing a protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 
days after the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant request 
shall be treated as an application for authorization pursuant to 
Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20668 Filed 8-3-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $6.25 CWT 0.965 $6.0313

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.6641 LB 3.5 $9.3244

Class I Price $15.3556

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $6.35 CWT 0.965 $6.1278

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.6074 LB 3.5 $9.1259

Class I Price $15.2537

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.1019

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0088

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0044

Price change per quart $0.0022

Price change per pint $0.0011

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0008

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0007

Price change per half pint $0.0005

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.01

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.00

Price adjustment per quart $0.00

Price adjustment per pint $0.00

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.00

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.00

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: July 1, 2018
No. 11-7685.

#### Terrence Willis, Petitioner v. Marcus Hardy, Warden.

565 U.S. 1182, 132 S. Ct. 1152,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1025,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 974.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
************************

• MONOGRAPH NO.: 3B8

************************

ITEM: Bun, Hamburger, Shelf Stable (BUN)

NSN: 8920-01-295-9275 ITEM SPECIFICATION: MIL-B-44359

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 255

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

 APPEARANCE: Rounded, typically hamburger bun shaped roll with brown crust and

off-white crumb.

 ODOR: Typical of yeast-raised white bread.

 FLAVOR: Slightly sweet; typical of yeast-raised white bread.

 TEXTURE: Soft, slightly gummy.

 ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT 70 DEGREES F: 36 months

 80 DEGREES F: 24 months

 90 DEGREES F: 18 months

 100 DEGREES F: 12 months

EXPECTED DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

 APPEARANCE: Slight to moderate darkening of crust; slight to pronounced brown

of crumb.

 ODOR: Malty aroma develops as storage temperature increases yeast aroma

increases.

 FLAVOR: Slight chemical, slight bitter flavor after prolonged storage at

elevated temperatures.

 TEXTURE: Increased firmness and chewiness.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: Product should be examined for mold growth

as a result of loss of package integrity or excessive moisture. Lab testing

for water activity or residual oxygen content may help develop disposition.

SPECIAL NOTES: Product is baked in ovenable paper trays, portioned into 6 or 12

buns per tray. Trays are packed in a multilayer laminated pouch. Individual

serving size is one bun of 2.5 ounces each (70.9 grams).
No. 11-6027.

#### Mark Manzella, Petitioner v. Dave Dormire, Superintendent, Jefferson City Correctional Center.

565 U.S. 982, 132 S. Ct. 506,

181 L. Ed. 2d 357,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7809,

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00473-CV

In the Interest of D.M., M.M., and 

M.M., Children

§

§

§

§

From the 323rd District Court

of Tarrant County (323-101474-15)

March 30, 2017

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the trial court’s 

order is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
H. R. 4646

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and six 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 7320 Reseda 

Boulevard in Reseda, California, as the ‘‘Coach John Wooden Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

7320 Reseda Boulevard in Reseda, California, shall be known and 

designated as the ‘‘Coach John Wooden Post Office Building’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Coach 

John Wooden Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.