alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
************************

MONOGRAPH NO.: 4A5

************************

ITEM: Peanut Butter (PBT)

NSN: 8930-01-225-9801 ITEM SPECIFICATION: MIL-C-44068

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 265 (PRIMARY)

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Tan to reddish brown, smooth, glossy, thin consistency.

ODOR: Fresh roasted peanuts.

FLAVOR: Fresh roasted peanuts, balanced sweet/salty peanut flavor, no 

bitterness.

TEXTURE: Very slightly grainy to smooth, sticky mouthfeel.

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT 70 DEGREES F: 66 months

 80 DEGREES F: 54 months

 90 DEGREES F: 42 months

 100 DEGREES F: 30 months

EXPECTED DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

 APPEARANCE: Darkening of color, moderately oily/oiled off.

ODOR: Musty, rancid, stale.

FLAVOR: Moderately bitter, rancid, stale.

TEXTURE: Moderate to oiling off (separation of the emulsion); hard and dry 

core or mass surrounded by extreme oiling off (due to oiling off; product cannot be 

kneaded back into emulsion).

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: For open package inspection, 

evaluate

half of the samples from the same producer without kneading and the other half after 

kneading the contents IAW package instructions. This will assist the inspector in 

assessing the affect oil separation has on the product after it is kneaded. 

SPECIAL NOTES: Packages should be kneaded and observed for leakage/bursting. 

Leaks, if they occur, should be identified as to location (e.g., body of pouch, side seal, 

end seal at interface between product edge of the seal and the body of the pouch). Due to 

the nature of the product and processing methodology used, the product may exhibit a 

slight burnt/over cooked, or slightly oily odor or flavor. These should not be 

misconstrued as defects during surveillance inspections. This product often has oily 

films on the surface of the package. If oily, observe package closely for tears, cuts or 

holes. If package integrity has not been compromised, note the oily package

in the remarks but do not score it as a defect. Flexible package is designed to yield 

approximately 1.5 ounces (42.5 grams).
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 147 (Friday, July 31, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20474]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EG98-92-000]


Medical Area Total Energy Plant, Inc.; Notice of Application for 
Commission Determination of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status

July 27, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 2, 1998, Medical Area Total Energy Plant, 
Inc. (MATEP), filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
(Commission) an application for determination of exempt wholesale 
generator status pursuant to Part 365 of the Commission's Regulations.
    MATEP states that it is a Massachusetts corporation organized 
exclusively for the purpose of owning and operating an electric 
generating facility in the Longwood Section of Boston, Massachusetts. 
MATEP further states that the name and address of one of its attorneys 
is:

Patricia M. French, LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae L.L.P., 260 
Franklin Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110-3143

MATEP further states that MATEP's facility is combined 62 MW net 
capacity diesel generation. MATEP states that no rate or charge in 
connection with this facility was in effect under the laws of any state 
as of October 24, 1992 or any time thereafter. MATEP further states 
that copies of the application were served upon the Securities and 
Exchange Commission and the Massachusetts Department of 
Telecommunications and Energy.
    Any person desiring to be heard concerning the application for 
exempt wholesale generator status should file a motion to intervene or 
comments with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 
and 385.214). The Commission will limit its consideration of comments 
to those that concern the adequacy or accuracy of the application. All 
such motions and comments should be filed on or before August 14, 1998, 
and must be served on the applicant. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20474 Filed 7-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
100

Section C: Recommended Funding Levels, by State

Michigan

Program Intervention Budgets: 2014

Recommended Annual Investment $110.6 million

Deaths in State Caused by Smoking

Annual average smoking-attributable deaths 16,200

Youth aged 0-17 projected to die from smoking 213,300

Annual Costs Incurred in State from Smoking

Total medical $4,590 million

State Revenue from Tobacco Sales and Settlement

FY 2012 tobacco tax revenue $972.3 million

FY 2012 tobacco settlement payment $256.2 million

Total state revenue from tobacco sales and settlement $1,228.5 million

Percent Tobacco Revenue to Fund at Recommended Level 9%

Annual Total (Millions) Annual Per Capita

Minimum Recommended Minimum Recommended

I. State and Community Interventions 

Multiple social resources working together will 

have the greatest long-term population impact.

$28.3 $35.4 $2.86 $3.58

II. Mass-Reach Health Communication Interventions 

Media interventions work to prevent smoking initiation, 

promote cessation, and shape social norms.

$7.9 $11.4 $0.80 $1.15

III. Cessation Interventions 

Tobacco use treatment is effective and highly cost-effective. $30.7 $49.4 $3.11 $5.00

IV. Surveillance and Evaluation 

Publicly funded programs should be accountable and 

demonstrate effectiveness.

$6.7 $9.6 $0.68 $0.97

V. Infrastructure, Administration, and Management 

Complex, integrated programs require experienced 

staff to provide fiscal management, accountability, 

and coordination.

$3.3 $4.8 $0.34 $0.49

TOTAL $76.9 $110.6 $7.79 $11.19

Note: A justification for each program element and the rationale for the budget estimates are provided in Section A. The funding estimates presented are based on adjustments for changes in population and cost-of-living increases since Best Practices—2007 was published. The actual 

funding required for implementing programs will vary depending on state characteristics, such as prevalence of tobacco use, sociodemographic 

factors, and other factors. See Appendix E for data sources on deaths, costs, revenue, and state-specific factors. 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • Office on Smoking and Health

www.cdc.gov/tobacco • tobaccoinfo@cdc.gov • 1 (800) CDC-INFO or 1 (800) 232-4636 

2014
************************* 

 * MONOGRAPH NO: 3A12 

 ************************* 

ITEM: Chocolate Brownie with M&Ms, Shelf Stable 

 (BMM) SECONDARY 

NSN: 8920 01 503 0700 ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR-C-024 Poly Tray 

 CHRACTERISTICS OF ITEM: 

 APPEARANCE: medium brown top with small M&M candies dispersed across; 

M&Ms may be cracked from baking, darker fudgy brown interior 

 ODOR: moderate chocolate; sweet 

 FLAVOR: moderate to rich chocolate; sweet; fudge brownie 

 TEXTURE: moist, dense; gummy chew; slightly crunchy M&Ms 

 ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36m 

 100 DEGREES F: 6m 

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES: 

 Appearance: darkened; dry; melted M&Ms; pale or darkened M&Ms; wet look 

 Odor: stale; old; low chocolate; rancid; bitter; scorched 

 Flavor: stale; old; low chocolate; bitter; scorched 

 Texture: drier; crumbly; cracked surface; gummy or hardened underside; M&Ms 

may bloom (white spots) 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None
***********************

 * MONOGRAPH NO: 1A6

***********************

ITEM: Corned Beef Hash (CBH)

NSN: 8940-01-237-9835 ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR-H-004 Can

 MIL-C-44253

 8940-01-455-3548 PCR-H-005 Poly

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 331 (PRIMARY) 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

Appearance: Finely ground reddish-mahogany corned beef, distinct potato dices, 

and minced green pepper pieces. Color profile: Reddish with translucent white 

cubes.

Odor: Typical of a slightly heat processed corned beef item with a slight green

pepper and cooked potato aroma.

Flavor: Moderate cooked potato, slightly sweet, heat processed corned beef, and a 

slight salt and green pepper flavor.

Texture: Chewy finely ground corned beef with firm potato dices.

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT 80 DEGREES F: 36 months

 100 DEGREES F: 6 months

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

Appearance: Product may become darker and may exhibit a slight oiling off.

Odor: Product may become slightly stale, starchy and have a stronger corned beef 

aroma.

Flavor: Slightly stale or slightly rancid. Product may exhibit a slight flavor loss and 

green peppers may be slightly bitter.

Texture: Product may become slightly drier and tough 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION / TEST PROCEDURES: None
SPECIAL NOTES: Can is designed to yield 18 portions of approximately 2/3 cup 

each (253 grams).
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of Biostar Angel Stem Cell Corporation
 (formerly Lily Grove Acquisition Corporation) (the "Company"),
hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2017 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ Keewon Ra
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Date: April 9, 2018
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth S. Ord, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |  |  |  |  |                                                     
|---------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|February 3, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    KENNETH S.
ORD                               
|                 |  |  |  |  |  | Kenneth S. Ord                                      
|                 |  |  |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                 |  |  |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7114

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WAYNE MARK BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (0:98-cr-01126-JFA-8; 0:06-cv-00187-JFA)

Submitted: January 25, 2007 Decided: January 29, 2007

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Mark Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Wayne Mark Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion.

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny his motion to hold

his appeal in abeyance and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3832 TAN 499 49.71 0.96 13.76

Standard 3832 OLIVE 527 45.70 1.04 17.62

Standard 3832 DARK GREEN

528 38.51 -4.13 13.27

Standard 3832 BROWN 529 39.81 3.60 12.19

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Shade Number OCP Piece/Roll Number 3832

DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT April 27, 2018

Fabric Nomenclature WEBBING, TEXTILE, TEXTURED OR 

MULTIFILAMENT NYLON A-A-55301

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $10.60 CWT 0.965 $10.23

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.9050 LB 3.5 $6.67

Class I Price $16.90

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $10.95 CWT 0.965 $10.57

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $1.9590 LB 3.5 $6.86

Class I Price $17.42

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT (0.53)

(4) Price change per gallon ($0.05)

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon ($0.02)

Price change per quart ($0.01)

Price change per pint ($0.01)

Price change per 14-oz pg. ($0.00)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.00)

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.00)

Price change per half pint ($0.00)

(6) Price adjustment per gallon (128-oz) ($0.05)

Price adjustment per half gallon (64-oz) ($0.02)

Price adjustment per quart (32-oz) ($0.01)

Price adjustment per pint (16oz) ($0.01)

Price change per 14-oz pg. ($0.00)

Price change per 12-oz pg. ($0.00)

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) ($0.00)

Price adjustment per half pint (8-oz) ($0.00)

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

is not equal to or greater than +/-$0.0100 (See paragraph (f)(1) of the clause). 

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: Sept. 5th, 2021
No. 10-11033.

#### Barry Mitchell, Petitioner v. John Lempke, Superintendent, Five Points Correctional Facility.

565 U.S. 1075, 132 S. Ct. 804,

181 L. Ed. 2d 515,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8444.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 863, 132 S. Ct. 205, 181 L. Ed. 2d 110, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6038.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of A ppeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 20, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 04-51127

_____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee

v. SERGIO MORALES-SANDOVAL Defendant - Appellant

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas, El Paso

--------------------- Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

IT IS ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate sentence is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to remand case to district court for resentencing is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s alternative motion to

extend time to file Appellee’s brief 14 days from the court’s denial of Appellee’s motion to vacate and remand is moot.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of
Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                   |  |  |  |  |  |                                                   
|------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------
|                   |  |  | 
|Dated: May 3, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Scott J. Krenz                                
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | Scott J. Krenz                                    
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
(1) Adjusting Price $15.99 CWT

(2) Base Price $15.21 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $0.78

(4) Price change per gallon $0.0671

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.0335

Price change per quart $0.0168

Price change per pint $0.0084

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.0063

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.0052

Price change per half pint $0.0042

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.07

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.03

Price adjustment per quart $0.02

Price adjustment per pint $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price adjustment per half pint $0.00

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Dept. of Food and Agriculture Announcement of Minimum Prices

 Effective Date: April 1, 2018
No. 11-7231.

#### Charles L. Goodell, Petitioner v. Jesse Williams, Warden.

565 U.S. 1127, 132 S. Ct. 1036,

181 L. Ed. 2d 763,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 128.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 643 F.3d 490.
No. 10-11242.

#### Marie W. Daniel, Petitioner v. Long Island Housing Partnership, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 1075, 132 S. Ct. 805,

181 L. Ed. 2d 516,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8372.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 874, 132 S. Ct. 232, 181 L. Ed. 2d 130, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6569.
SARA M. BIRD

was inducted into the Defense Supply Center Philadelphia Hall of Fame this sixteenth day of 

October 2002 for her continuous outstanding mission support from 1967 through 2000. Ms. Bird 

distinguished herself through her years of dedicated and brilliant service and her critical role in 

transforming Department of Defense logistics practices by spearheading the adoption of Prime 

Vendor and Just-in-Time inventory practices that radically altered established logistics concepts 

and doctrine. She is recognized for her exemplary leadership of DSCP’s Medical Directorate in 

peacetime and war. She ensured rapid and effective logistics support to every overseas deployment 

during her tenure. She was a role model for every woman in the government who followed her 

after she smashed through the “glass ceiling.” Her exceptional dedication and the professional 

manner in which she performed throughout her career at DSCP will always be remembered. 

Hall of Fame Inductees Page 1 of 1

https://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/about_us/bird.htm 1/21/2016
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6251

ROBERT LANE WISE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THEODIS BECK, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CA-03-91-1) Submitted: June 14, 2004 Decided: July 1, 2004 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lane Wise, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wallace-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Robert Lane Wise, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that his constitutional claims are debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 337-81 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wise has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED