alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018058EN.01024801.xml

| 15.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/248 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/248

---

P8_TA(2016)0117

Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors — Ladislav Balko

European Parliament decision of 13 April 2016 on the nomination of Ladislav Balko as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C8-0413/2015 — 2015/0816(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2018/C 058/37)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0413/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0413/2015),

| — | having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0055/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0055/2016),

| A. | whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

| B. | whereas at its meeting of 15 March 2016 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

B.

whereas at its meeting of 15 March 2016 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors;

| 1. | Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Ladislav Balko as a Member of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Ladislav Balko as a Member of the Court of Auditors;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.

---
No. 11-160.

#### Donald C. Marro, Petitioner v. Fauquier Hospital, Inc.

565 U.S. 944, 132 S. Ct. 411,

181 L. Ed. 2d 259,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7258.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
No. 11-159.

#### Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, Petitioner v. Karen K. Capato, on Behalf of B. N. C., et al.

565 U.S. 1104, 132 S. Ct. 995,

181 L. Ed. 2d 725,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 8.

January 6, 2012.

Motion of Solicitor General to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOSEPH SILKY

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1638

[ November 1, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael Rothschild

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 07

- 1182 CF10A

.

Joseph Silky, Crawfordville, pro se.

No brief filed for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., D AMOORGIAN and L EVINE

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 11-592.

#### The Peterson Law Firm, et al., Petitioners v. City of Los Angeles, California.

565 U.S. 1157, 132 S. Ct. 1101,

181 L. Ed. 2d 979,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 869.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
No. 11-6259.

#### Ronald Christmas, Petitioner v. Illinois.

565 U.S. 1175, 132 S. Ct. 1138,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1012,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 664.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 987, 132 S. Ct. 520, 181 L. Ed. 2d 365, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7895.
No. 11-7397.

#### Eric A. Graham, Petitioner v. A. J. Padula, Warden.

565 U.S. 1164, 132 S. Ct. 1109,

181 L. Ed. 2d 992,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 770.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 415 Fed. Appx. 477.
#### J. C. Steel, *Appellant,*v. P. M. Steel and B. M. Bonifay, as Trustees in Bankruptcy of D. R. Moore, Bankrupt, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision filed January 13, 1926.

*S. K. Gillis,*for Appellant;

*Leroy V. Holst erry*and *T. R. James,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspeted, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said order; it is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
No. 10-10696.

#### Tommy Span, Petitioner v. Gary S. Barders, et al.

565 U.S. 1101, 132 S. Ct. 868,

181 L. Ed. 2d 565,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 9012.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 844, 132 S. Ct. 160, 181 L. Ed. 2d 75, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6030.
No. 10-10267.

#### Donald G. Jones, Petitioner v. Joseph Canizaro, et al.

565 U.S. 1149, 132 S. Ct. 1077,

181 L. Ed. 2d 795,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 546.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 832, 132 S. Ct. 132, 181 L. Ed. 2d 53, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5757.
No. 11-5720.

#### Justin Smith, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 920, 132 S. Ct. 343,

181 L. Ed. 2d 215,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6815.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 424 Fed. Appx. 686.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth S. Ord, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|            |  |                                                     
|----------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|May 4, 2010 |  | /S/    KENNETH S.
ORD                               
|            |  | Kenneth S. Ord                                      
|            |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|            |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
PO Box 4055 , Greenvill e, SC 29608 

## - 864.492.1648 

## - www.m3partnersllc.com March 17, 2015 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S W Wa shington, DC 20591 Subject: M3 PARTNERS, LLC (DBA W HITE TOP UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS W T

- UAS PETITION FOR EXEMPTION To W hom It May Concern: Please accept this petition for exemption on behalf of M3 Partners, LLC. Our petition is submitted with the desire to operate UAS’s in conjunction with M3 Partners business supporting helicopter/helipad & real estate services. M3 Partners owners have extensive knowledge and experience in both the civilian and military aviation fields and would like to bring this knowledge to the safe operational control of UAS’s to support and enhance its business. The knowledge and tools tha t M 3 Partners has created to assist in making helicopter and helipad operations safer are prime examples of our continual focus on safety and the belief that safety can always be improved upon. It is this same determination that we can bring to our UAS op erations if we are granted an exemption and serve as an example of how a deep understanding of best practices from the civilian and military aviation sectors can be applied to UAS operations. An exemption would also allow our business to grow and operate more efficiently allowing M3 Partners to expand and provide increased employment opportunities to our local community. We look forward to working with the Department of Transportation and the Federal Aviation Administration at the inception of commercia l UAS operations. W e respectfully request that our petition be granted and allow M3 Partners to serve as a role model for UAS operations now and in the future.
Respectfully,

Michael W . Middleton Martin J. Fisher President Member
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT UNDER SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steve
E. Krognes, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Denali Therapeutics Inc.; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: July 13, 2018



/s/ Steve E. KrognesSteve E. KrognesChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
### RECORD IMPOUNDED

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO . A

- 0787

- 20 D.K.

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

,

v.

J.E.Y.

,

Defendant

- Respondent

.

__________________________

Submitted December 8, 2021

– Decided December 15, 2021

Before Judges Gooden Brown and Gummer.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Monmouth County, Docket No. FV

- 13

- 15 72

- 20.

Pashman Stein Walder Hayden, attorneys for appellant (Dillon J. McGuire, of counsel and on the briefs).

Ste ph en A. Gravatt, attorney for respondent

.

PER CURIAM NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court

. " A lthough it is posted on the internet

, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited

. R

. 1:36

- 3.2 A

- 0787

- 20

We have been advi sed that this matter has been amicably resolved and the

parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal

is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dismissed.
May 12, 2022 DLA-SM-22-3213

DLA - Strategic Materials Announces

Chromium Metal Awards 

 

 

FORT BELVOIR, Va. – The Defense Logistics Agency - Strategic Materials 

announced today that 50.20 ST of chromium metal has been awarded under 

DLA-Stockpile Materials-001 (Negotiated) Amendment No. 001 (FY 22

NEG CHROMIUM METAL). The awards have a total value of 

approximately $723K.

The material was awarded to the following companies:

- Exotech, Inc.

- Voss Metals

For additional information please visit our website

www.dla.mil/hq/acquisition/strategicmaterials or contact DLA Strategic 

Materials Directorate of Strategic Planning and Market Research at 

DLAStrategicMaterials@dla.mil.
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS FOR FORM 10-Q**I, Steven P. Dussek, Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Cellular Corporation (the “registrant”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report isbeing prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.        May 10, 2006 /s/ STEVEN P. DUSSEK   Steven P. Dussek   *Chief Executive Officerand principal executive officer*
No. 11-5902.

#### John Mingo, Petitioner v. William Lee, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility.

565 U.S. 966, 132 S. Ct. 460,

181 L. Ed. 2d 300,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7467.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
No. D-2603.

#### In the Matter of Disbarment of Michael R. Luongo.

565 U.S. 975, 132 S. Ct. 546,

181 L. Ed. 2d 392,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7705.

October 31, 2011.

Disbarment entered.

*393Former order, 564 U.S. 1034, 131 S. Ct. 3087, 180 L. Ed. 2d 909, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 4847.
Date: 19 December 2017 ********************

NSN: 8940-01-455-1872 (BDE) * MONOGRAPH 3A3

 ******************** 

Item: Blueberry Dessert

Document: PCR-B-036A, Blueberry Dessert, Packaged in a Polymeric Tray, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 111 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

General: Blueberry dessert (cooked blueberries in sauce).

Blueberries: Distinct, dark purple cooked blueberries.

Sauce: Glossy dark purple color and there shall be no evidence of syneresis.

Odor: Moderately sweet and slightly acidic.

Flavor: Moderately sweet and slightly acidic cooked blueberries in a sweetened sauce.

Texture:

Blueberries: Slightly soft and tender.

Sauce: Smooth and moderately thick; shall not contain excessive seeds and skin 

particulates; shall not be gelatinous.

Possible Deteriorative Changes

Appearance:

Blueberries: Broken blueberries.

Sauce: Evidence of syneresis.

Odor: Fermented, caramelized.

Flavor: Fermented, caramelized, sour.

Texture: Blueberries: Excessively soft, mushy.

Sauce: Thin to watery.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

N/A

Special Notes

N/A
No. 11-644.

#### Keith Litman, et al., Petitioners v. Célico Partnership, dba Verizon Wireless.

565 U.S. 1115, 132 S. Ct. 1046,

181 L. Ed. 2d 741,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 174.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 655 F.3d 225.
No. 11-388.

#### Pedro Galindo-Romero, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

565 U.S. 1061, 132 S. Ct. 774,

181 L. Ed. 2d 486,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8619.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

*487Same case below, 640 F.3d 873.
No. 11-5305.

#### Roy Ellison Thomas, Petitioner v. United States; and Herbert Cisco Hay, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1115, 132 S. Ct. 998,

181 L. Ed. 2d 742,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 260.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 361 (first judgment); and 422 Fed. Appx. 362 (second judgment).
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Entech Environmental Technologies, Inc.,
a Florida corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Burr Northrop, as Principal Accounting Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date: February
      20 , 2008
            By:
            /s/ Burr NorthropBurr
      NorthropPrincipal
      Accounting Officer
No. 11-6994.

#### In re Hector Barajas, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 1109, 132 S. Ct. 1017,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 459.

181 L. Ed. 2d 794,

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
Amendment 2 to Employment Agreement - Steven J. Demetriou



 Exhibit 10.4.2 
 Amendment 2 of Employment Agreement 
 Mr. Steven Demetriou (the
“Executive”) and Aleris International, Inc. (the “Company”) and for certain purposes Aleris Corporation (the “Parent”) formerly Aleris Holding Company entered into an agreement dated June 1, 2010 as amended by a
letter dated April 5, 2011 (the “Agreement”). 
 The Executive, Company and Parent desire to amend the Agreement
effective immediately prior to the effectiveness of an initial public offering of Parent pursuant to the Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 26, 2011, as amended, as follows: 

1. Clause (ii) of the first sentence of Section 3 is amended by replacing the words “twelve (12) months” with
“thirty (30) days.” 
 2. Section 5(a)(i)(C)(2) is amended by replacing the words after “(B)” with
“two (2).” 
 3. The last paragraph of Section 5(a)(i) is amended to read as follows: “For purposes of this
Agreement, the Severance Period shall mean two (2) years.” 
 4. The last sentences of Sections 5(a)(ii) and
(d) shall be amended to add at the end thereof the following: 
 “; provided, further, however, notwithstanding the
foregoing, if termination of employment is in anticipation of or within twelve (12) months following a Change of Control (as defined in the Aleris Corporation 2012 Equity Incentive Plan), the Severance Payment will be paid in a cash lump sum
within thirty (30) days following the Date of Termination, to the extent permissible under the rules regarding a “short term deferral” within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.409A-1(b)(4) of the Code and
“separation pay plans” within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.409A-1(b)(9) of the Code or otherwise not subject Executive to taxes under Section 409A of the Code. For purposes of the foregoing, a termination of
employment will be deemed to be “in anticipation of” a Change of Control if such termination is for the principal purpose of avoiding or evading the Company’s or Parent’s compensation obligations that would arise upon a
termination following a Change of Control.” 
 5. Section 5(d) is amended by replacing the words “twelve
(12)” with “twenty (24)” in the two places it appears and to add after “(ii)” the following “the product of (x) two times (y)”. 
 6. Except as expressly amended by this letter agreement, the Agreement shall otherwise continue in full force and effect. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written
above. 
  

	
	Executive
	
	  
	Steven J. Demetriou


  

			
	Aleris International, Inc.
	
	 
	By:	 	Christopher R. Clegg
	Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary


  

	
	Aleris Corporation
	
	  
	Christopher R. Clegg
	Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary



  
 2