alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.1 Home Interiors & Gifts, Inc.1649 Frankford Road West
Carrollton, Texas 75006 August 9, 2004 Ms. Christi Carter Urschel
4923 Brookview Drive
Dallas, Texas 75220 Re:
    
    Master Book Agreement, among Meredith Corporation (Meredith), Home Interiors
& Gifts, Inc. (HIG) and Christi Carter Urschel, dated as of August 9, 2004 (the Book
Agreement)
 Dear Christi: The purpose of this letter agreement is to confirm certain agreements between HIG and you
relating to the undertakings set forth in the Book Agreement. Capitalized terms used in this
letter agreement, unless otherwise defined in this letter agreement, shall have the meanings set
forth in the Book Agreement. 1. HIG has agreed under Article 7 of the Agreement to purchase approximately 40,000 copies of
the Book (the Purchased Books), less the number sold by Meredith pursuant to Article 10 of the
Agreement, for a purchase price of $12.17 per copy of the Book (which shall include cost of dust
jackets, shrink wrap, and a pre-printed barcode with information supplied by Home Interiors). HIG
shall pay you the difference between (i) all Net Receipts generated from the sale of the Purchased
Books, and (ii) the cost of purchasing the Purchased Books and all direct, out-of-pocket costs
associated with marketing, distributing, warehousing, and selling the Purchased Books. You agree
that you will not earn a royalty on any sales of the Purchased Books. HIG agrees that six months
after it makes its initial purchase of Books from Meredith and every three months thereafter, it
will provide you will an accounting that will include the number of Books purchased, the number of
Books sold, the revenue from Books sold, and the direct, out-of-pocket costs associated with
marketing, distributing, warehousing, and selling the Books. 2. HIG shall consult with you prior to setting the price at which the Books are to be offered
for sale, which price may be different than the MSRP. The price at which the Books are offered for
sale from time to time shall be a matter within the sole discretion of HIG. 3. You agree that you will give HIG advance notice and approval rights of any written public
communications that refer to HIG in connection with Article 4 of the Book Agreement.




---



##### 



Ms. Christi Carter Urschel
August 9, 2004
Page 2 4. You agree that during the term of the Book Agreement you will work with HIGs marketing and
communications teams to develop concepts for selling the Book through commercial retailers. Please indicate your agreement with these terms by executing this letter agreement in the
space below and returning a signed original to me at your earliest convenience. Sincerely,/s/MICHAEL D. LOHNERMichael D. LohnerPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMDL/cllExhibit 10 1.DOCAGREED:/s/CHRISTI CARTER URSCHEL
    
    Date: January 20, 2005Christi Carter Urschel
*The Honorable Pasco M. Bowman stepped down as Chief Judge of the United

States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit at the end of the day on April 23, 1999.

He has been succeeded by the Honorable Roger L. Wollman.

**The Honorable Andrew W. Bogue, United States District Judge for the District

of South Dakota, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3792

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Missouri.

*

Guy Spencer Long, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: April 20, 1999

Filed: April 28, 1999

___________

Before BOWMAN,* Chief Judge, FAGG, Circuit Judge, and BOGUE,** District Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Guy Spencer Long appeals his conviction for bank robbery. Long contends the

district court improperly admitted evidence offered by the government under Federal

Rule of Evidence 404(b). We have carefully considered Long's contention and find it
-2-

to be without merit. We also conclude that a discussion of the issue presented by this

appeal will serve no useful purpose. We thus affirm Long's conviction. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[J-6-2024] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 85 MAP 2023 Appellee

V.
MICHAEL THOMPSON, Appellant Appeal from the Order ofthe Superior Court at No. 2632 EDA 2021 dated February 7, 2023 Affirming the Judgment ofSentence ofthe Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, Criminal Division, at No. CP-23-CR-0002233-2020 dated December 13, 2021. :ARGUED: March 5, 2024
ORDER
PER CURIAM DECIDED: May 31, 2024 AND NOW, this 31St day of May, 2024, the appeal is DISMISSED as having been improvidently granted. Justice Wechtfiles adissenting statement.
# Official Journal C 422/4 No

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 422 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 654 November 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 422

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 654 November 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 422/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2022/C 422/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 6 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 422/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2022/C 422/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4674 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

110 North Chestnut Street in Olathe, Kansas, as the ‘‘Governor John 

Anderson, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2006 

Mr. MOORE of Kansas (for himself, Mr. TIAHRT, Mr. RYUN of Kansas, and 

Mr. MORAN of Kansas) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 110 North Chestnut Street in Olathe, Kansas, 

as the ‘‘Governor John Anderson, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GOVERNOR JOHN ANDERSON, JR. POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 110 North Chestnut Street in 

7 Olathe, Kansas, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Governor John Anderson, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 
2 

•HR 4674 IH 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Governor John Ander5 son, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Æ
No. 11-7351.

#### Robert L. Hillman, Petitioner v. Robin Knab, Warden

565 U.S. 1163, 132 S. Ct. 1105,

181 L. Ed. 2d 990,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 851.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 11-6075.

#### In re Carl J. Bowens, Jr., Petitioner.

565 U.S. 976, 132 S. Ct. 509,

181 L. Ed. 2d 390,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7652.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4659

AN ACT

To amend the USA PATRIOT ACT to extend the sunset 

of certain provisions of such Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2

•HR 4659 EH 

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE 

2 USA PATRIOT ACT. 

3 Section 224(a) of the Uniting and Strengthening 

4 America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to 

5 Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) 

6 Act of 2001 (Public Law 107–56; 115 Stat. 295) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘February 3, 2006’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘March 10, 2006’’.

Passed the House of Representatives February 1, 

2006. 

Attest:

Clerk. 
109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4659

AN ACT

To amend the USA PATRIOT ACT to extend the 

sunset of certain provisions of such Act.
18 May 2007 

NSN: 8940-01-545-1789 (DBCB) MONOGRAPH NO: FS3-03 

Item: Dessert Bar, Shelf Stable, Chocolate Banana Nut (Flavor III) 

Document: PCR-D-004, Dessert Bar, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf Stable 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 220 Component Classification: Primary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80oF 

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Intact and free of cracks, smooth surface, dense structure, medium brown color, small 

walnut pieces visible throughout, may have visible cark chocolate chips. 

Odor: Moderate banana and a mild cocoa odor, mild sweet cream and a mild walnut flavor, 

free of coconut odor. 

Flavor: Moderate banana and a mild cocoa flavor, mild sweet cream and a mild walnut flavor, 

free of coconut flavor. 

Texture: Dense matrix with smooth, creamy mouth feel, firm nut pieces throughout. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkened, crumbly, dense fudgy paste. Dessert bar sticking to package. 

Odor: Rancid, stale, oxidized, old cooking oil. Loss of banana odor. Old/rotten banana. 

Flavor: Rancid, oxidized, stale. Loss of and/or old/rotten banana. 

Texture: Excessively firm, crumbly. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

This product is vacuum packaged. Inspect for “inadequate vacuum” by firmly grasping the edges of 

the package and attempting to pull or stretch the material away from the product for a short time. A 

pouch with adequate vacuum will return to its original shape when pressure is released. If vacuum is 

adequate the product will not move easily within the pouch. 

Special Notes

NA
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00472-CV

Willie A. Trent, Appellant

v.

Alex Brown, Appellee

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF BELL COUNTY

NO. 85237, THE HONORABLE JEANNE PARKER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Willie A. Trent has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal, explaining 

that the parties have settled their dispute. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

__________________________________________

Thomas J. Baker, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: December 18, 2019
No. 11-6848.

#### Derrick L. Braddock, Petitioner v. Lloyd Rapelje, Warden.

565 U.S. 1096, 132 S. Ct. 851,

181 L. Ed. 2d 555,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 9006,

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-13-01054-CR

Style: Jimmy R. Williams

v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: March 25, 2014

Type of motion: Extension of time to file Anders response

Party filing motion: Pro se

Document to be filed: Anders response

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: March 28, 2014

Number of previous extensions granted: 0 Current Due date: March 28, 2014

Date Requested: N/A

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Appellant previously filed a motion for extension of time to file his Anders response on March 21, 2014.

The Court granted appellant’s motion and ordered appellant’s Anders response to be filed by April 28,

2014. Appellant has filed a second motion for extension requesting the same relief. Appellant’s motion for

extension filed March 25, 2014 is dismissed as moot. Appellant’s Anders response is due April 28, 2014.

Judge's signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley



Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: April 1, 2014
No. 10-10952.

#### Henry Howard, Petitioner v. Primrose Transportation Management, et al.

565 U.S. 859, 132 S. Ct. 194,

181 L. Ed. 2d 101,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6045.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District, denied.
No. 11-7277.

#### Michael Perkins, Petitioner v. David Rock, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility, et al.

565 U.S. 1162, 132 S. Ct. 1102,

181 L. Ed. 2d 987,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 763.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
#### Ament v. Kirkegard

OP 16-0560

10/04/16

Dismissed without prejudice

Original Proceeding Habeas Corpus
# C_2016344EN.01000701.xml

| 20.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/7

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 344/10)

| Member State | United Kingdom |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Stornoway to Benbecula, Western Isles, Scotland |
| Period of validity of the contract | 1 April 2017 until 31 March 2021 |
| Deadline for submission of applications and tenders | Two months after the publication of this notice. |
| Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | For further information please contact:





  Comhairle nan Eilean Siar (Western Isles Council) |
| Council Offices, Sandwick Road, Stornoway, Isle of Lewis |
| HS1 2BW |
| Scotland |
| UNITED KINGDOM |
| Tel. +44 1851822640 |
| Fax +44 1851705349 |
| Contact: Kathleen MacLeod, Procurement Manager, Department of Finance and Corporate Resources |
| Email: kathleen.macleod@cne-siar.gov.uk |
| Internet: www.cne-siar.gov.uk |

Member State

United Kingdom

Route concerned

Stornoway to Benbecula, Western Isles, Scotland

Period of validity of the contract

1 April 2017 until 31 March 2021

Deadline for submission of applications and tenders

Two months after the publication of this notice.

Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

For further information please contact:

Comhairle nan Eilean Siar (Western Isles Council)

Council Offices, Sandwick Road, Stornoway, Isle of Lewis

HS1 2BW

Scotland

UNITED KINGDOM

Tel. +44 1851822640

Fax +44 1851705349

Contact: Kathleen MacLeod, Procurement Manager, Department of Finance and Corporate Resources

Email: kathleen.macleod@cne-siar.gov.uk

Internet: www.cne-siar.gov.uk

---
# C_2015236EN.01001401.xml

| 20.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/14

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 June 2015 — European Commission v MOL Magyar Olaj- és Gázipari Nyrt.

(Case C-15/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeals - State aid - Agreement between Hungary and the oil and gas company MOL relating to mining fees in connection with the extraction of hydrocarbons - Subsequent amendment to the statutory rules increasing the rate of the fees - Increase in fees not applied to MOL - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market - Selective nature))

(2015/C 236/18)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and K. Talabér-Ritz, Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: MOL Magyar Olaj- és Gázipari Nyrt. (represented by: N. Niejahr, Rechtsanwältin, and F. Carlin, Barrister)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 61, 1.3.2014.

1

---
No. 11-552.

#### Kansas City Premier Apartments, Inc., Petitioner v. Missouri Real Estate Commission.

565 U.S. 1114, 132 S. Ct. 1075,

181 L. Ed. 2d 739,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 299.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.

Same case below, 344 S.W.3d 160.
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

 

2... See In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]

2001, orig. proceeding) (providing that applicant may seek 11.07 mandamus

relief only from Court of Criminal Appeals).

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-488-CV

IN RE RONALD MICHAEL HILL RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is

of the opinion that it has no jurisdiction over the relief requested. Tex. Code

Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 5 (Vernon Supp. 2008) ; Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. 2

§ 22.221 (Vernon 2004). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus

is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED: January 28, 2009
No. 11-5357.

#### Darious M. Bowens, Petitioner v. Illinois.

565 U.S. 1159, 132 S. Ct. 1090,

181 L. Ed. 2d 982,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 854.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District, denied.

Same case below, 407 Ill. App. 3d 1094, 348 Ill. Dec. 339, 943 N.E.2d 1249.