alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-2257

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Tevonta Reair Tiller lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Western

____________ Submitted: January 11, 2021 Filed: January 22, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Tevonta Tiller appeals after he pleaded guilty to bank robbery and a firearm offense, and the district court 1 sentenced him below the Guidelines range. His counsel

1 The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), arguing that Tiller’s conviction and sentence should be vacated due to vindictive prosecution. Upon careful review, we conclude that Tiller did not demonstrate that the government vindictively prosecuted him. See United States v. Williams, 793 F.3d 957, 963-64 (8th Cir. 2015) (defendant bears heavy burden to demonstrate vindictive prosecution); United States v. Chappell, 779 F.3d 872, 880 (8th Cir. 2015) (presumption of regularity supports prosecutorial decisions absent clear, contrary evidence). We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motions to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
No. 11-6905.

#### Anthony Evans, Petitioner v. Robert Kirkpatrick, Superintendent, Wende Correctional Facility.

565 U.S. 1119, 132 S. Ct. 1012,

181 L. Ed. 2d 749,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 225.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
No. 11-5701.

#### Jeremy Allen Crozier, Petitioner v. United States, et al.

565 U.S. 919, 132 S. Ct. 342,

181 L. Ed. 2d 214,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7068.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 11-7602.

#### Keith Brandon Smith, Petitioner v. Linda Metrish, Warden.

565 U.S. 1181, 132 S. Ct. 1151,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1024,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1052.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 436 Fed. Appx. 554.
# C_2016121EN.01000301.xml

| 6.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/3

---

Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

(2016/C 121/03)

Pursuant to the second indent of Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

1

2

On page 167, the following text is inserted after the existing text of the explanatory note to CN subheading ‘3403 19 90 Other’:

On page 167, the following text is inserted after the existing text of the explanatory note to CN subheading ‘3403 19 90 Other

‘This subheading includes, inter alia, preparations based on synthetic lubricants. In particular, this refers to preparations based on one or more of the following constituents:

| — | poly(alphaolefins) or poly(isobutylenes) of which less than 60 % by volume distils at 300 °C, after conversion to 1 013 mbar when a reduced-pressure distillation method is used, |
| --- | --- |

—

poly(alphaolefins) or poly(isobutylenes) of which less than 60 % by volume distils at 300 °C, after conversion to 1 013 mbar when a reduced-pressure distillation method is used,

| — | long chain alkylaromatics, |
| --- | --- |

—

long chain alkylaromatics,

| — | esters, |
| --- | --- |

—

esters,

| — | polyglycols, |
| --- | --- |

—

polyglycols,

| — | silicones.’ |
| --- | --- |

—

silicones.’

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 76, 4.3.2015, p. 1.

2

---
APP J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

 ****************************** 

 MONOGRAPH NO. BO8 

 ******************************

ITEM: Hot Sauce, Extra Hot – 4x, Type II, 3 fl. oz. 

SPECIFICATION: CIC A-A-20097D NSN: 8950 01 433 2207 

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 20 

COMPONENT CLASSIFICATION: Ancillary 

 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM: 

APPEARANCE: Red to reddish brown liquid. 

ODOR: Pungent, vinegary, peppery. 

FLAVOR: Slightly to moderately sweet, moderate pepper oil, slight 

Vinegar, slight woody, well blended, slight afterburn. 

TEXTURE: Smooth (thin) suspension of red pepper without 

stratification or separation 

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 70 DEGREES F: 36 months 

80 DEGREES F: 24 months 

90 DEGREES F: 18 months 

100 DEGREES F: 12 months 

EXPECTED DETERIORATIVE CHANGES: 

APPEARANCE: Red color fades to yellowish brown. White Specks may 

be evidence of yeast and mold growth. 

ODOR: No changes due to chemical breakdown have been noted. 

Yeasty or Fermented odor would be caused by microbial 

growth. 

FLAVOR: No changes noted at time of publication. 

TEXTURE: Moderate sedimentation as opposed to slight 

sedimentation that is characteristically normal. 

 

Monograph BO8, PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES 
APP J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: Product should be tasted by itself initially 

and in small quantities only. Subsequent evaluation should be done when used on the entree that 

it was packed with. Due to the spicy nature of the product, it should be the last component given 

sensory evaluation to prevent carryover to other samples and consequent masking of their odor 

and flavor. 

SPECIAL NOTES: Screw caps shall be secured to bottles with a band of plastic shrink film or 

sealing tape. If shrink film or sealing tape is loose or deteriorating, annotate the inspection 

worksheet accordingly but do not score as a defect unless the contents are leaking out. 

Monograph BO8, PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES
# C_2016096EN.01000901.xml

| 11.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/9

---

Notice concerning a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU

Request made by a Contracting Entity

(2016/C 96/07)

On 2 February 2016 the Commission received a request in accordance with Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement procedures by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (1). The first working day following receipt of the request is 3 February 2016.

1

This request is made by Vapo Oy and concerns activities relating to the exploitation of a geographical area for the purposes of exploring or extracting fuel peat on the territory of Finland. Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU provides that the latter Directive is not applicable when the relevant activity is directly exposed to competition in markets to which access is not restricted. These conditions are evaluated solely for the purposes of Directive 2014/25/EU and are without prejudice to the application of competition rules or other fields of EU policies.

Pursuant to letter (b) of first paragraph, of point 1 of Annex IV to Directive 2014/25/EU, the Commission is allowed a period of 130 working days to take a decision on this request, commencing on the working day referred to above. The period therefore expires on 12 August 2016.

---

(1)  OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243.

1

---
No. 11-7337.

#### Dean Sacco, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1148, 132 S. Ct. 1040,

181 L. Ed. 2d 791,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 440.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

*792Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 650 F.3d 839.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Charter Graham L.P. and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      21,318,778
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  506,328<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,625,610<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,625,610<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             (856,407)<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,525,719
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,382,126)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,382,126)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,382,126)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include subscriptions receivable of $397,301 and
interest receivable of $109,027.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized loss on open contracts of $199,496.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $258,909, accrued brokerage
fees of $124,928 and accrued management fees of $35,693.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $(459,075), net
change in unrealized of $(1,270,027) and interest income of $872,695.
</FN>



</TABLE>
No. 11-6298.

#### Carlos Marquez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 958, 132 S. Ct. 439,

181 L. Ed. 2d 285,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7233.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 428 Fed. Appx. 317.
No. 11-5548.

#### Stanimir G. Pavlov, aka Atanas Velichkov Yordanvo, Petitioner v. Dick Smelser, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 914, 132 S. Ct. 327,

181 L. Ed. 2d 203,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 5945.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 636.
#### J. M. Markley, Hugh Anderson, R. B. Leonard, and J. V. Riley, Co-partners Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Miami Block Company, *Plaintiffs in*Error, v. I. E. Schilling Company, a Corporation Organized and Existing Under the Laws of the State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed June 3, 1926.

Petition for rehearing denied July 3, 1926.

*Burdine & Barco*and *Edward E. Fleming,*for Plaintiffs in Error.

*Stapp, Tining & Ward, M. 8. Bolet, Hudson & Carson,*and *Myers*& *Myers,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

— Assumpsit on an account running between May 6, 1921 and June 24, 1921, was brought against J. M. Markley, Hugh Anderson, R. B. Leonard and J. Y. Riley, co-partners doing business under the firm name and style of Miami Block Company. Markley, Anderson and Leonard *1030pleaded: never were indebted as alleged and also “that at the time of the alleged right of action the plaintiff accrued and at the time of the institution Of this suit, the said defendants nor either of them were partners of or interested in any way with the said co-partnership doing busiñéss under the name of MIAMI BLOCK COMPANY.”

Riley pleaded: never was indebted as alleged. Yerdict and judgment were rendered against all of the defendants as co-partners for the full amount of the running account. Writ of error was taken by the defendants.

Articles of incorporation to the Miami Block Company were issued in January 1921, upon the' application of the defendants and one other person who were incorporators and subscribers to the capital stock. Nothing further appears to have been done under or pursuant to the charter. Under the statute, Section 4054, Revised General Statutes of 1920, the stockholders are liable as members of a general partnership, the requirements of the statute not having been complied with; but it appears that notice was brought-home to the plaintiff on May 21, 1921, that the defendants Markley, Anderson and Leonard were out of the Miami Block Company, therefore, Markley, Anderson and Leonard were not liable for items of indebtedness incurred after May 21, 1921. The joint judgment against all the defendants for the entire account is erroneous. See Winfield v. Truitt, 71 Fla. 38, 70 South. Rep. 775; Graham v. Sewell, 80 Fla. 720, 86 South. Rep. 639; Mechanics & Metals Nat. Bank of City of New York v. Angel, 79 Fla. 761, 85 South. Rep. 675; Charles v. Young, 74 Fla. 298, South Rep. 869.

Reversed.

Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur;

Brown, C. J., and Ellis, J., Concur in the opinion.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LEILA SURPRISE, HERBY SURPRISE and DENISE SURPRISE
, Appellant s ,

v.

CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORP.
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 506

[ May 14, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Sandra Perlman , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE14

- 015184

.

Melissa A. Giasi of Giasi Law, P.A., Tampa, for appellants.

Jessica C. Conner of Dean, Ringer, Morgan & Lawton, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE
, C.J., C IKLIN and C ONNER
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2016064EN.01000901.xml

| 19.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/9

---

Commission communication concerning the application to register the name ‘Knack d’Alsace’ as a protected geographical indication pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

(2016/C 64/07)

France’s application to register the name ‘Knack d’Alsace’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ C 222, 7.7.2015, p. 5).

Official Journal of the European Union

The Order of 16 December 2015, published in the Official Journal of the French Republic of 19 December 2015, repeals the Order of 15 May 2014 concerning the approval of the specification for the name ‘Knack d’Alsace’. Accordingly, on 23 December 2015, the French authorities notified the European Commission of their decision to withdraw the application to register the name ‘Knack d’Alsace’ as a protected geographical indication.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 13
                                                                   -------------
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Anthony & Sylvan Pools Corporation
Chardon, Ohio


We have reviewed the accompanying condensed balance sheet of Anthony & Sylvan
Pools Corporation (the "Company") as of June 30, 1999, and the related
condensed statements of operations for the three-month and six-month periods
ended June 30, 1999 and 1998, and its cash flows for the six-month periods
ended June 30, 1999 and 1998. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures
to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial
and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit
conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to such condensed consolidated financial statements for them
to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31,
1998, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders'
equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in
our report dated February 19, 1999, we expressed an unqualified opinion on
those financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the
accompanying condensed balance sheet as of December 31, 1998 is fairly
stated, in all material respects, in relation to the balance sheet from which
it has been derived.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
August 11, 1999
No. 10-10536.

#### Annie P. Walker, Petitioner v. Todd Honyaouma.

565 U.S. 1185, 132 S. Ct. 1162,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1017.

181 L. Ed. 2d 1032,

January 23, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 1057, 132 S. Ct. 754, 181 L. Ed. 2d 481, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8471.
Cite as 2017 Ark. 274

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

IN RE CLIENT SECURITY FUND

COMMITTEE

Opinion Delivered: October 5, 2017

PER CURIAM

The court appoints Angela Galvis Schnuerle, Esq., of North Little Rock, to the 

Client Security Fund Committee for a five-year term expiring on July 31, 2022. The court 

appreciates Ms. Schnuerle’s willingness to serve on this important committee.

Kandice A. Bell, Esq., of White Hall, is reappointed to the Client Security Fund 

Committee for a five-year term expiring on July 31, 2022. The court thanks Ms. Bell for 

her continued service on this committee.

The court expresses its gratitude to JoAnn Maxey of Little Rock, whose term has 

expired, for her many years of service on the Client Security Fund Committee.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4679 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4679

 To amend the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, to 
require the Attorney General to make available on the Internet website 
  of the Department of Justice all registration statements and other 
       documents filed with the Attorney General under such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2006

 Mrs. Schmidt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, to 
require the Attorney General to make available on the Internet website 
  of the Department of Justice all registration statements and other 
       documents filed with the Attorney General under such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FARA Sunshine Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO MAKE AVAILABLE ON THE INTERNET WEBSITE OF THE 
              DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ALL REGISTRATION STATEMENTS AND 
              OTHER DOCUMENTS FILED UNDER THE FOREIGN AGENTS 
              REGISTRATION ACT OF 1938, AS AMENDED.

    Section 6 of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as 
amended (22 U.S.C. 616), is amended by adding at the end the following 
new subsection:
    ``(d) The Attorney General shall make available on the Internet 
website of the Department of Justice all registration statements and 
supplements thereto filed under section 2 of this Act, all 
informational materials filed under section 4 of this Act, and any 
other documents filed with the Attorney General under this Act.''.
                                 <all>
```
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 18053 STANDARD 23.35 -0.24 -1.68

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

DLA/NAVY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT July 2, 2018

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, PLAIN WEAVE, ARAMID, 

REINFORCEMENT PD 01-17

Shade Number BLACK 3238 Piece/Roll Number 18053
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the periodic report of CelLynx Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kevin Pickard, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





Date: May 17, 2010
/s/ Kevin PickardKevin Pickard, Consultant providing services commonly provided by a

chief financial officer

(Principal Financial Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.