alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8540-8541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4059]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License; Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for license as a 
Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean 
Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act 
of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409 and 46 CFR part 515).

[[Page 8541]]

    Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicants should 
not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, 
DC 20573.

Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier Ocean Transportation Intermediary 
Applicants

Ocean Blue Express, Inc., 1225 W. 190th Street, Gardena, CA 90248, 
Officers: Sung Ho Sun, President, (Qualifying Individual).
WP Logistics Inc. dba F.C.C. Logistics Inc., 13025 Cerise Ave., 
Hawthorne, CA 90250, Officer: Cindy Yamamoto, Secretary, (Qualifying 
Individual).
LCL Shipping USA, Inc. dba Cargo Planet Logistics, 15117 S. Broadway 
Street, Gardena, CA 90248, Officer: Tim Mao, CEO, (Qualifying 
Individual).

Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder 
Transportation Intermediary Applicants

Bacarella Transportation Services, Inc., dba BTX Sea Freight, 731 Main 
Street, Monroe, CT 06468, Officer: Rosario Bacarella, President, 
(Qualifying Individual).
UT Freight Forwarders Ltd., 161-15 Rockaway Blvd., Jamaica, NY 11434, 
Officer: Franky Ying K. Fong, Vice President, (Qualifying Individual).
The Scoular Company dba TSC Container Freight, 250 Marquette Ave., 
Minneapolis, MN 55401, Officer: John A. Messerich, Vice President, 
(Qualifying Individual).
Global Galan Logistics, Inc., 3132 SW 173rd Terrace, Miramar, FL 33029, 
Officer: George A. Galan, President, (Qualifying Individual).
MJS Trading, Inc., 13350 NW 42nd Ave., Suite 13, Opa Locka, FL 33054, 
Officer: Emilia V. Vilianueva, President, (Qualifying Individual).
Astral Freight Services, Inc., 1418 NW 82nd Ave., Doral, FL 33126, 
Officer: Nay Lessa, Vice President, (Qualifying Individual).
Freightplus (USA), Inc., 4466 Karls Gate Drive, Marietta, GA 30068, 
Officer: Christopher J. Katcher, Secretary, (Qualifying Individual).
Forman Shipping U.S.A. Inc. dba SDS Trans, 145-38 157th Street, 1st 
Floor, Jamaica, NY 11434, Officer: Si Yualan, President, (Qualifying 
Individual).
Doma Consolidating Inc. dba Doma Shipping, 2520 S. State Street, 
Chicago, IL 60616, Officer: Mina A. Georgalas, President, (Qualifying 
Individual).
Maritime and Intermodal Logistics Systems, Inc., dba MLS Fesco 
Logistics, 1000 Second Ave., Seattle, WA 98104, Officer: Junko Altman, 
Secretary, (Qualifying Individual).

    Dated: February 20, 2009.
Tanga S. FitzGibbon,
Assistant Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-4059 Filed 2-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
16 January 2013 *************************

NSN: 8960-01-527-8228 (CBP) *MONOGRAPH NO: M7P *

*************************

Item: Cocoa beverage powder, Sugar sweetened, Without marshmallows, Chocolate hazelnut, 

Flat interlocking closure pouch (Type I, Style B, Flavor F, Design B)

Document: CID A-A-20189, Cocoa Beverage Powder and PKG&QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 150 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Powdered product: Well-blended homogenous mixture, free of lumps, light to medium 

brown.

Hydrated product: Well-blended, uniform consistency without floating, agglomerated 

cocoa particles; light to medium brown; disperse readily in hot or cold water.

Odor: Powdered product: Cocoa and sweet milk solids.

Hydrated product: Sweet milk chocolate, hazelnut cream-like.

Flavor: Powdered product: Cocoa and sweet milk solids.

Hydrated product: Sweet milk chocolate, hazelnut cream-like.

Texture: Powdered product: Free flowing and fine.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Powdered product: Caking, lumpiness, darkened areas. Off colors.

Hydrated product: Darkened color, settling or undissolved material.

Odor: Decreased cocoa and hazelnut odor. Rancid. Cooked or scorched milk. Bitter chocolate.

Flavor: Decreased cocoa and hazelnut flavor. Rancid. Cooked or scorched milk. Bitter 

chocolate.

Texture: Powdered product: Caked or lumpy (see Special Notes). 

Hydrated product: Particles fail to disperse in hot or cold water.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Initial examination should be done in the dry state. Final examination should be done after 

reconstituting. Even if caked in the dry state it should be reconstituted for future reference.

Special Notes

Product may contain lumps which are of no concern provided they break or fall apart under light finger 

pressure. Dark brown specs may become larger as more moisture is absorbed into the product.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I, Joseph Furnari, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A of HyreCar Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2018 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HyreCar Inc.



|Dated: April 30, 2019 | By: | /s/ Joseph Furnari                                           
|--------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |     | Joseph Furnari                                               
|                      |     | Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer)
LEAKER 

Table IV, Defect No. 2. Leaker, Critical defect. 

This container is scored once—as a “Leaker” (critical defect) and 

not as a dent (a major defect). The major dent undoubtedly cause 

the leakage, therefore, as a related defect, it is scored 

according to whichever condition is most serious.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         202,900
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  626,882
<ALLOWANCES>                                   71,609
<INVENTORY>                                    229,457
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,035,769
<PP&E>                                         195,388
<DEPRECIATION>                                 29,898
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,208,379
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,122,404
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4,580
<OTHER-SE>                                     55,558
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,208,379
<SALES>                                        602,512
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               602,512
<CGS>                                          475,474
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  361,912
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             11,510
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (89,415)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (335,799
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.08)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Corey Henry, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be
filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.            Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report
under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and
15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wilmington Trust, National
Association.



| | By:    | /s/ Corey Henry                                                                          | 
| | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Name:  | Corey Henry                                                                             
| | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor
| |        | (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)                           
| | Date:  | March 30, 2020
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3485 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide that overthe-road bus drivers are covered under the maximum hours requirements. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2019 

Ms. SPEIER (for herself, Ms. BROWNLEY of California, and Ms. SCHAKOWSKY) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide 

that over-the-road bus drivers are covered under the 

maximum hours requirements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Driver Fatigue Preven5 tion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT 

7 OF 1938. 

8 Section 13(b)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 

9 1938 (29 U.S.C. 213(b)(1)) is amended by inserting beVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:22 Jul 03, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3485.IH H3485

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3485 IH

1 fore the semicolon the following: ‘‘, except an employee 

2 employed as a driver of an over-the-road bus, which is a 

3 bus characterized by an elevated passenger deck located 

4 over a baggage compartment.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
**Roxanne J. BanksDLA Acquisition, J7Defense Logistics AgencyFort Belvoir, Virginia**

Ms. Roxanne J. Banks currently serves as Deputy Director of Acquisition (J7) Defense Logistics Agency, Fort Belvoir, VA.  She is responsible for the development, application, and oversight of DLA acquisition policy, plans, programs, functional systems and operations for the annual Agency acquisition program exceeding $35 billion.  In addition, she serves as Head of Contracting Activity for DLA’s Distribution, Disposition, Strategic Materials, Joint Contingency Acquisition Support Office and DLA’s Contracting Support Office.  As Senior Services Manager, she oversees a portfolio exceeding $2 billion and is responsible for establishing appropriate management structures and processes to ensure effective validation and execution of the acquisition of services for DLA.

Ms. Banks has been a member of the Senior Executive Service since 2013 when she joined the Small Business Administration as their Director of the Denver Finance Center (DFC).  While at DFC, Ms. Banks provided oversight of SBA’s financial management operations and served as Senior Procurement Executive for contract execution of internal requirements.

Ms. Banks attended the College of Santa Fe, Santa Fe, New Mexico, from which she received a Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration.  She completed her postgraduate education at St. Mary’s University in San Antonio, Texas, where she received a Master’s in Business Administration.  She also holds a Master of Science in National Resource Strategy from the Industrial College of the Armed Forces, Ft. McNair, Washington, DC.

Ms. Banks started her acquisition career in 1989 as an Air Force Copper Cap Intern at the Aeronautical Systems Center, Wright-Patterson AFB, Dayton, Ohio.  She went on to serve in numerous Air Force acquisition assignments with increasing levels of responsibility at the Human Systems Center, Brooks AFB, Texas; the Space and Missile Systems Center, Detachment 12, and the Air Force Inspection Agency, both at Kirtland AFB, New Mexico; and at the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Contracting), Pentagon, Washington, DC.  In 2006, Ms. Banks served as the Director of Contracting, Missile Defense Integration & Operations Center, Missile Defense Agency, Colorado Springs, Colorado.  

Ms. Banks is a certified Professional Contracts Manager, a member of the Defense Acquisition Corps and is Level III certified in Contracting, and Level I certified in Program Management.  She is a graduate of the Defense Systems Management College’s Advanced Program Management Course, the Defense Acquisition University’s Senior Acquisition Course and the Federal Executive Institute, Leadership for a Democratic Society.

# image1.jpeg
No. 11-480.

#### Frederick Raymond Droney, Petitioner v. Tim Fitch, et al.

565 U.S. 1112, 132 S. Ct. 1011,

181 L. Ed. 2d 736,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 269.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 423 Fed. Appx. 669.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Wellshire Financial Services, LLC d/b/a Loanstar Title

Loans d/b/a Moneymax Title Loans and d/b/a Loanmax;

Meadowwood Financial Services, LLC d/b/a Loanstar Title

Loans and d/b/a Moneymax Title Loans; and Integrity Texas

F unding, LP

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 7

- 000 87

- CV

Trial court case number: 2013

- 33584

Trial court: 152nd District Court of Harris County

The court has received records marked “in camera

, ” but t here is no

indication that the records are protected from public disclosure by a Rule

76a sealing order. Appellate opinions are prohibited from being sealed. T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 76a(1); see T EX . R. A PP

. P. 47.3. Information contained in the in

camera filed documents may be necessary to determine the issue s in this

mandamus proceeding. Therefore, the parties are hereby notified that we may

discuss any and all of the materials marked as in camera in any appellate

opinion in this case unless a party demonstrates that a Rule 76a sealing order

applies

.

If either party wishes to continue to assert that documents should not be

discussed in any appellate opinion in this case, that party must notify this Court

by Friday, February 10, 2017 either t hat there is a Rule 76a sealing order in

place or that the party will pursue a Rule 76a sealing order from the trial court.

In reviewing any Rule 76a motion, the trial court should consider an

appellate court’s obligati on to publish an opinion tha t “addresses every issue

raised and necessary to final disposition of the appeal” and to advise the

parties of “the basic reasons” for the court’s decision. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.1,

47.4.It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

Acting individually

Date: February 8

, 2017
Opinion issued November 21, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas

NO. 01-13-00726-CR

____________

JUSTIN NAQUIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1389803

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement with the State, Justin Naquin pleaded 
2

guilty to the offense of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.

1

 The trial court 

accepted the plea agreement and sentenced Naquin to 15 years in prison and 

certified that this is a plea-bargain case and there is no right to appeal. Less than 30 

days later, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. 

In a plea bargain case—that is, a case in which a defendant’s plea was guilty 

or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment 

recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant—a defendant may 

appeal only those matters that were raised by written motion and ruled on before 

trial, or after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal. TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(a)(2). 

The record reflects that Naquin pleaded guilty to the charged offense and the 

trial court assessed the punishment recommended by the State and to which 

appellant had agreed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant does not complain 

about the trial court’s ruling on a pretrial motion, nor does he have the trial court’s 

permission to appeal. See id. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. All pending 

motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Sharp and Brown.

 

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.02(a)(2)(West Supp. 2013).
3

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
#### Atlantic Richfield v. 2nd Jud. Dist. Ct.

OP 16-0555

10/05/16

Granted in part

Original Proceeding Supervisory Control
No. 11-7791.

#### Juan Landa-Ordaz, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1170, 132 S. Ct. 1123,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1001,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 610.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

*1002Same case below, 440 Fed. Appx. 430.
No. 10-10525.

#### Joel Castillo-Perales, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, et al.

565 U.S. 1092, 132 S. Ct. 843,

181 L. Ed. 2d 548,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8975.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 411 Fed. Appx. 695.
***********************

 * MONOGRAPH NO: 1D5

***********************

ITEM: Potatoes with Bacon (PBP) PRIMARY

NSN: 8940-01-237-9827 ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR-P-020 Can

 MIL-P-44239

 8940-01-455-1871 PCR-P-021 Poly 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Potato dices, bacon pieces, and small pieces of minced onion in a 

smooth sauce. Color profile: Potato dices are glossy dark tan; bacon pieces are 

reddish-brown, and sauce is tan.

ODOR: Moderate cooked bacon, slight to moderate cooked onion, moderate 

pepper, with a slightly salty flavor.

FLAVOR: Cooked potato, slight bacon, moderate onion, moderate pepper, with a 

slightly salty flavor.

TEXTURE: Tender firm potato dices and tender chewy bacon pieces in a smooth 

sauce.

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36 months

 100 DEGREES F: 6 months

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

Appearance: Potatoes may darken.

Odor: Slightly stale.

Flavor: Slightly stale. Product may take on a smoky bacon flavor.

Texture: Product may become slightly dry, especially the potatoes.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None.
Montana Twenty-First Judicial District Court. County of Ravalli.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, -vs- KRISTIAN KAVEKA ZSUPNIK, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-14-298

DECISION

On October 27, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a commitment to the Montana Department of Corrections, for placement in a prison for a period of ten (10) years, for the offense of Charge I - Criminal Endangerment, a Felony, in violation of §45-5-207, MCA. The Court ordered the sentence to run consecutively to the sentence imposed in DC-14-180.

The total commitment period in Cause Nos. DC-14-180, DC-14-295, DC-14-298 and DC-14-299 is a 20-year commitment to a prison designated by the Montana Department of Corrections, to run consecutively to the Department 2 sentences in Cause Nos. DC-04-13 and DC-09-101. The Defendant was ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $3,886.82.

On May 5, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Jennifer Streano of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of *61Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

Done in open Court this 5th day of May, 2016.

DATED this 10th day of June, 2016.

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Brad Newman, Member and Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 150 (Wednesday, August 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 41889]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20806]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed During the Week Ending 
July 24, 1998

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. Sections 412 and 414. 
Answers may be filed within 21 days of date of filing.
    Docket Number: OST-98-4168.
    Date Filed: July 23, 1998.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: PTC12 USA-EUR 0054 dated June 29, 1998 r1-25, Mail Vote 
947 (USA-Austria/Belgium/Germany), Intended effective date: November 1, 
1998.
Dorothy W. Walker,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 98-20806 Filed 8-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P