alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-3 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer International Puerto Rico LLC (the Subservicer), does
hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Subservicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2017, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc.,
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-3 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the activities and performance of the Subservicer under the Servicing Agreement, dated July 15, 2016 (the Servicing Agreement), by and between Santander Consumer USA Inc. and Santander
Consumer International Puerto Rico LLC, and the related Second Amended and Restated Program Portfolio Schedule (Publicly Registered Transactions), dated as of June 28, 2017 (the Second Amended and Restated Program Portfolio Schedule, together
with the Servicing Agreement, the Subservicing Agreement), during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement and the Subservicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the
subject of the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER INTERNATIONAL PUERTO RICO LLCBy:

/s/ Jose RamirezName:

Jose RamirezTitle:

Vice President of Servicing for Santander Consumer International Puerto Rico, LLCDate:

March 30, 2018
No. 11-6612.

#### Benjamin Sifrit, Petitioner v. John A. Rowley, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 1018, 132 S. Ct. 559,

181 L. Ed. 2d 403,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7954.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 173.
No. D-2614.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Richard Mark Creel.

565 U.S. 1053, 132 S. Ct. 811,

181 L. Ed. 2d 521,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8436.

November 28, 2011.

Richard Mark Creel, of Naples, Florida, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 *522days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Same case below, 53 So. 3d 230.
No. 11-7697.

#### Robert C. Daniels, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1138, 132 S. Ct. 1069,

181 L. Ed. 2d 784,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 462.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 653 F.3d 399.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3546 

To prevent Federal agencies from interfering with the marijuana policy of 

States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 27, 2019 

Mr. BLUMENAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee 

on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prevent Federal agencies from interfering with the 

marijuana policy of States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Cannabis Com5 merce Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STATES MARIJUANA POLICY. 

7 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3546 IH

1 (1) FEDERAL AGENCY.—The term ‘‘Federal 

2 agency’’ has the meaning given the term ‘‘agency’’ 

3 in section 551 of title 5, United States Code. 

4 (2) MARIJUANA.—The term ‘‘marijuana’’ has 

5 the meaning given the term ‘‘marihuana’’ in section 

6 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 

7 802). 

8 (3) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means any 

9 State, the District of Columbia, any territory or pos10 session of the United States, or any Indian tribal 

11 government. 

12 (b) PROHIBITIONS.—No funds authorized or appro13 priated by Federal law, and none of the funds in any trust 

14 fund to which funds are authorized or appropriated by 

15 Federal law, shall be expended to prevent any State from 

16 implementing any law of the State that— 

17 (1) authorizes the use, distribution, possession, 

18 or cultivation of marijuana on non-Federal land in 

19 the State; or 

20 (2) authorizes the transportation of marijuana 

21 across the border of the State if— 

22 (A) the State from which the marijuana is 

23 transported has a State law described in para24 graph (1); and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3546 IH

1 (B) the State and the State from which 

2 the marijuana is transported have both author3 ized such transportation of marijuana between 

4 the States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
No. 11-7423.

#### Enyil Raul Moradel-Ruiz, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1131, 132 S. Ct. 1049,

181 L. Ed. 2d 770,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 53.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 256.
No. 11-133 (R46-001).

#### Ralph Rausch, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 971, 132 S. Ct. 474,

181 L. Ed. 2d 309,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7594.

October 19, 2011.

The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in the above-entitled case was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46 of the Rules of this Court.

Same case below, 638 F.3d 1296.
Opinion issued March 6, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-17-00878-CR

———————————

IN RE JULIO DAVID MORALES, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Julio David Morales, proceeding pro se and incarcerated, has filed a 

petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial court to rule on relator’s 

request for a copy of the trial court record “upon a loaner basis” for use in preparing 

a post-conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus.

1

 

1 The underlying cause is The State of Texas v. Julio David Morales, cause number 

1064706, in the 338th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable 

Ramona Franklin presiding.
2

We deny the petition.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Higley.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
≥95% (15 awardees)

75% - 94% (33 awardees)

50% - 74% (7 awardees)

25% - 49% (1 awardee)

<25% (0 awardees)

No IIS (0 awardees)

No data (0 awardees)

Percentage of adolescents aged 11 – 17 years participating in an immunization 

information system -- United States, five cities§, and D.C., 2021

National Participation: 86% (excluding Territories)

Source: CY2021 IISAR

§ Chicago, IL; Houston, TX; New York City, NY; Philadelphia, PA; San Antonio, TX.
Order filed, October 24, 2018

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 18

- 00915

- CV

____________ RAY W. WARE, M.D., G UARDIAN FOR THE PERS ON AND ESTATE OF

ALAN KEITH WARE , Appellant

V.

MACARTHUR TOWNHOMES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATI ON BOARD OF DIRECTORS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 225th District Court

Bexar County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017CI20339



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due October 22, 2018

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a r equest to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record
has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Luis Duran, Jr. and Maria E. Fattahi , the court reporter s , to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

.
PER CURIAM
Exhibit 35.9



|     |  |                                                                                                          
|---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing D1050-084, 8th Fl 401 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 30, 2017, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase
Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Servicer, Aegon USA Realty Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust,
National Association, as Trustee and Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC, as Operating Advisor , with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2017-245P (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise
defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 13.7 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing
Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.



LOGO



Leslie
Hayton

Managing Director

Wells Fargo Bank



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
No. 11-7919.

#### David W. Webb, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1173, 132 S. Ct. 1131,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1007,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 677.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 655 F.3d 1238.
No. 10-11175.

#### Wilner Altidor, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 871, 132 S. Ct. 224,

181 L. Ed. 2d 124,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7132.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 11-635.

#### Francesk Ujka, et al., Petitioners v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

565 U.S. 1158, 132 S. Ct. 1108,

181 L. Ed. 2d 980,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 904.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

*981Same case below, 423 Fed. Appx. 960.
Chief. Documentary Services Div. Depar:ment of Tra.nsportmion Washington. D.C. 20590 DES!GNA TlON 

### OF AGENT 

### FOR SERVICE OF NOTICE. PROCESS. ORDERS DECISIONS AND 

### REQUIREMENTS



### ATTENTION; DOCKET SECTiON. C-55 

## Oceanair Linhas Aereas S/A d a 

## Avianca Brazil**---~-----** (Name of Company,**ple:~se** 

### prinn 

### Av. Hashington Luis, 7059, Campo Belo, SP 04627-006, 

## .Brazil (Address) hereby desigrw!e>. pursuam to section 46 HH ofTitk -19 of the U.S. Code**lfoml~rly** >ettion HXl:'i!t'>l of !he 

### F"'ckra! .'\1 b!ion Att of !95i:L**~~** amend.:dl the person named**~km** as iJ;..AgerH upon whom serrke**of~li** notice' w1<J proce.''·**and~~~** onkh. d..:cbiorh. ;Jnd 

### r.equir.enwnb of !he Depanmcnt of"'Transponation may 

### lx made for and on beh;:M of ;aid c..m"icr. herd') canceling**~ll** pre\ inu, desigrwiions of agent" made 

### by it ro the DOT.
{Please Printl 

## Zuckert, Scoutt 

## & Rasenberger, LLl? 888 17th 

### st., Ntv, 

### vvashingf::on DC 20006 Address ---------·------·--------

### ·-~----------~·-··-·-···- The Agent so designated has wrincn his name and also his initials in the following space:
Name 

# Oa,\J\cl

# Y\.(~A.t\~t'Sbee.....**(Initials)~---**
lN WJTNESS WHEREOF.

presents to be signed in its name 

### by iPlease Print) 

### of 

### said c-ompany. 

### and 

## w be anested under its 

### corporate 

### seal by

{Secretary. or other Title)



### Oceanai r Linhas 

## Aereas ;;,wp;;··- ,

# ;:.:,\_

# XL..J;/~-~~--**,~~:"""~:::::--~** 

# !_

·,"'o (?resident}**~**

' ..........**,~** 

## OCEANAIR UNHAS AEREAS S/A. ' By:


## ) / 

### '·
. ,;;+/other officer)
DOW CONFIDENTIAL - Do not share without permission

Gel Time determination in CASE materials

DOW Europe

Birch Vale

HYP 012A

Gel / Demould Time (Elevated 

Temperature)

Author: G Mason

Date: 30/04/09

Apparatus Reagents

1 L. tin

Palette Knife

120 x 220 x 2 mm Sheet Mould

80 mm diameter x 30 mm Block Mould Hot 

Plate

Vacuum Chamber

Digital Thermometer with flat probe

Top pan balance

0 – 100 Thermometer

Air circulating oven

Timer

Specified co – reactant

Macsil

PPE Protective clothing, safety glasses, disposable gloves.

Step Action

1. Check the temperature of the hotplate with the digital thermometer (should be 

75-85 C)
DOW CONFIDENTIAL - Do not share without permission

2. Spray the hotplate with Macsil.

3. Make sure you have a count up timer available.

4. Ensure the prepolymer is clear, if cloudy discard and get fresh.

5. Make sure the sample is thoroughly mixed

6. Ensure the sample and the relevant prepolymer are at the temperature 

specified by the test sheet. (+/- 1 degree)

7. (Half an hour in the 40C oven is usually sufficient but check with a 

thermometer – other ways of heating will be required if the temp is higher 

than this).

8. Check balance is level and the pan is clean.

9. Weigh the two components into a one-litre tin in the specified ratio.

You will need a combined weight of 250 – 300g to cast two sheets and a block.

10. Start the timer and begin mixing thoroughly

11. Scraping down the sides and along the bottom of the tin once

12. Mix for one minute.

13. Then put the tin in the vacuum chamber and degas for 1’ 45’’ (shaking the 

chamber if necessary to stop it overflowing). (See STP 117)

14. Remove from the chamber and transfer immediately to the mould (sheets first) 

noting whereabouts the first part was poured on. 

15. You should create two sheets if physical tests are required and at least a 1cm 

thick block for a hardness test.

16. The surface of the sheets can be flamed to remove any surface bubbles.

17. Take care not to burn the surface.

18. To test for gel time, touch the surface of the sheet at the point where it was 

first poured on with a spatula and gently pull it away.

19. The gel time is when a string is created between the sheet and the spatula.

20. Record the time to the nearest 5 seconds but leave the timer counting if there 

is a demould specification. 

21. The demould time is when the block can be easily removed from the mould 
DOW CONFIDENTIAL - Do not share without permission

without deformation.

22. If physical tests or hardness is specified see STP 115.

23. Dispose of sample as polyol waste.

Revision History Date: By:

Document Revised into DOW format 14/10/2009 G Mason
No. 11-6626.

#### Mario Arthur Garcia, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1160, 132 S. Ct. 1093,

181 L. Ed. 2d 983,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 810.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 432 Fed. Appx. 248.
No. 11-381.

#### Standard Investment Chartered, Inc., on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, Petitioner v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 1173, 132 S. Ct. 1093,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1008,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 605.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

*1009Jusice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 637 F.3d 112.
No. 11-7294.

#### Francisco Diaz Arteaga, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1148, 132 S. Ct. 1038,

181 L. Ed. 2d 791,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 535.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 436 Fed. Appx. 343.
No. 11-7021.

#### Jeffrey Cromer, Petitioner v. McKither Bodison, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 1121, 132 S. Ct. 1020,

181 L. Ed. 2d 752,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 210,

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

*753Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 172.
No. 10-11064.

#### Bruce Alan Wilson, Petitioner v. Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 1013, 132 S. Ct. 549,

181 L. Ed. 2d 396,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8031.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Letter Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 [MRMI LETTERHEAD] 
 March 30, 2012 

Gregory K. Silvers 
 EPT Concord II, LLC

 c/o Entertainment Properties Trust 

909 Walnut Street, Suite 200 
 Kansas City,
Missouri 64106 
 Dear Mr. Silvers: 
 Reference is made to that certain Option Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2011, between EPT Concord II, LLC (“EPT”), as owner of the Property described therein, and Monticello Raceway
Management, Inc. (“MRMI”; together with EPT, collectively, the “Parties”), as tenant, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Option Agreement”), with respect to MRMI’s option to lease the Property in
accordance with the terms set forth in the form of lease attached thereto as Exhibit B. The Parties hereby agree to amend the Option Agreement to extend the MDA Outside Date (as defined therein) by thirty (30) days, such that the MDA Outside
Date (as defined therein) shall mean April 30, 2012. Neither EPT nor MRMI (nor any of their respective permitted successors or assigns) shall have the right to terminate the Option Agreement prior to the MDA Outside Date as extended by this
letter agreement. Furthermore, the Parties agree to amend the Option Agreement to extend the term of the Option Exercise Period (as defined therein) by thirty (30) days, such that the Option Exercise Period End Date (as defined therein) shall
mean July 21, 2012 (as the same may be extended pursuant to Section 1(b) of the Option Agreement). Except for the extension of the MDA Outside Date and the Option Exercise Period End Date, the Option Agreement is unamended and remains in
full force and effect. 
 [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] 







 If the foregoing accurately sets forth your understanding of our agreement, please indicate
your concurrence by signing in the space provided below and returning one copy of this letter to the undersigned. We look forward to continuing to work with you to complete the master development plan expeditiously. 

 

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	Monticello Raceway Management, Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Laurette J. Pitts

		 	Name: Laurette J. Pitts
		 	Title: Chief Financial Officer


 Accepted and agreed to as of 
 the 30th day
of March, 2012: 
  

			
	EPT Concord II, LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Gregory K. Silvers

		 	Name: Gregory K. Silvers
		 	Title: Vice President

 With notice to: 

EPT Concord II, LLC 
 c/o Entertainment
Properties Trust 
 909 Walnut Street, Suite 200 
 Kansas City, Missouri 64106 
 Attention: Asset Manager 

And copies to: 
 Entertainment Properties Trust

 909 Walnut Street, Suite 200 
 Kansas
City, Missouri 64106 
 Attention: General Counsel 
 and 
 Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP 

One New York Plaza 
 New York, New York 10004

 Attention: Harry R. Silvera, Esq.
No. 11-6565.

#### Marvin M. Parker, Petitioner v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 1066, 132 S. Ct. 773,

181 L. Ed. 2d 496,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8537.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 435 Fed. Appx. 292.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3595 

To amend section 1342 of title 31, United States Code (the Antideficiency 

Act), to define the term voluntary services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2019 

Mr. ROY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend section 1342 of title 31, United States Code 

(the Antideficiency Act), to define the term voluntary 

services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Charitable Donations 

5 Freedom Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. VOLUNTARY SERVICES. 

7 Section 1342 of title 31, United States Code (the 

8 Antideficiency Act), is amended by adding at the end the 

9 following new sentence: ‘‘As used in this section, the term 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3595 IH

1 ‘voluntary services’ does not include the donation of 

2 goods.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
No. 11M58.

#### Lawrence Goldblatt, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

565 U.S. 1108, 132 S. Ct. 1072,

181 L. Ed. 2d 729,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 400.

January 9, 2012.

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with the declaration of indigency under seal denied.