alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATIONS***
Exhibit 31.1
I, Francis I. duPont, III, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First National Bancshares, Inc.;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report;
4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis quarterly report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report(the “Evaluation Date”); and  c)  Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5.      The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)  All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controlswhich could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any materialweaknesses in internal controls; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
6.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly reportwhether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors thatcould significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recentevaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.        Date: May 10, 2005 /s/    *Francis I. duPont, III*   Title: Principal Executive Officer
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. 

### FA A- Directorate Identifier: 

### -AD

flyou make changes to !he \'Glues in the table below. you must e ns ur e tlze totals update accordingly. (/' !hey do not , click (or 

### Tab) into 

### a11d then ouL 

### (?[!he changed cell. Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e.g. , aircraft, eng ine, (e.g., In spection, prop e ll er, appliance)

rep lacement) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Tota l Cost Do not include on- (include cost ( labor+ 

## u. s. for U.S

. Fleet condition costs here access, testing, (@$85 /h parts) Registered and close-up) o ur) Products Inspection I '.: 20

. 5 $0 ·: . •...., 42.**~{)** 

### 165 ' 

# . I i )



### ... 0.\l(l 

## ' ' O

. fH I 

### ' ! I O.iJ{) ( 

### o on 'I li ' )[)**~** t) (Ill I 'II () .t=•l 

### ' 0

. (11) !I,,, ' . l ')(} \ · ' · ' () tt() ! '· 

# " ll fJu lj flj J 

### ' tl ' 1).00 0 ljl l - : ) \1 il

. ()ll \ (J 

### 110 

### '' un \ q (Jji**~** lJ.OU '· II Pi.\ 0.1\i) ' O.Ol J 

## ' 'I II() ', 

### n t.l O 

# " 0

.0 0 I '\ f l I**~I** \ 

# " ll.(JO 

# s 0

. ()() \, 1.1 (10 O.t)O . , 0 ( H) j 

## ' i)

. l(t \ 1 ).()(1 \ () 1)(\**~;** 11 ''ri) 

# ' II 011 .; rl HI \ {) Ill 1).{)(1 (' ·,q ' I I (II'**~** I) (!{! ( IJ.I,l( l II , ;fj (, 

# ,·,, , I J.JII f• rro I) ,(I( 1 ' () (II) ' I

. (I(J The known number of p r oducts in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $287 , 513 Costs covered under wan-an

## tv (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

# ~ Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Produc t (e

. g. , Insp ection, (include access, (@$85 / hour) testing, and close

- rep lacement) up) \ ! ()() \ 0 (llj ·:- 

## o.co ',

. . l,(iO :-., (J .OO**~.** l !Ill 

# s fJ Uil 

### ' \ ) q; 

### Special co nsiderations fot· Ec onom ic Analysis (Use this fie ld to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assum e d or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):

### Executive Order 12866: 

### Could the AD be con sidered a "significant regulatory



# action"?~ YES* 

# D NO 

### j:gl *Exp lanation: DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

### I s the AD significant? • YES* 

# D NO 

### j:gl *Explanation: Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

### Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of s mall entiti es? Explain for either a Ye s or No answer. 

# 0 YES 

# D NO 

### j:gl Explanation: Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

### Thi s AD could affect intras tate aviat ion in Alaska. I s it appropr i ate to include specitic requirements for a ircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?



# ~ YES* 

# D NO 

### j:gl *Exp lanation:
## Department of Environmental

Conservation

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER

Post Office Box 111800 410 Willoughby Avenue, Suite 303

Juneau, Alaska 99811-1800

Main: 907.465.5066

Fax: 907.465.5070 14.023

February 11, 2014

Dennis McLerran Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 10

1200 Sixth Avenue

Seattle WA 98101

Definition of Regulated NSR Pollutants

Dear Mr. McLerran:

The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservati on (ADEC) submits this letter in response to the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10’s (EPA’s) concerns about the definition of “regulated NSR pollutant” that currently appears in ADEC’s Air Quali ty Regulations, 18 AAC 50. These regulations have been submitted to EPA for State Implementation Plan a pproval, most recently on January 24, 2013.

ADEC has adopted by reference in 18 AAC 50.040(h) th e “regulated NSR pollutant” definition found in 40 CFR 52.21(b)(50). 1 EPA recently pointed out to ADEC that this reference does not address precursor emissions in nonattainment areas. That aspect is instead addressed in the “regulated NSR pollutant” definition in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxxvii), which ADEC has not adopted. 2

ADEC intends to propose revisions to the appropriate sections of 18 AAC 50 to update the “regulated NSR pollutant” definition to incorporate the additional aspects provided under 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)((xxxvii) and to begin the public notice and comment process at the firs t opportunity. In the meantime, if ADEC receives an application for a major new source review stationary source in the Fairbanks PM-2.5 nonattainment area, staff will inform the applicant that EPA considers nitrogen oxide (NO

x ) emissions as a precursor to PM-2.5 and that the application would need to address NO

x as a PM-2.5 precursor in order for ADEC to issue a permit that would meet federal requirements.

ADEC hopes this information will allow EPA to approv e our currently submitted SIPs while we move forward with the rulemaking process to revise 18 AAC 50.

1 18 AAC 50.990(92) reads as follows : “‘regulated NSR pollutant’ has the meaning give n in 40 C.F.R. 52.21( b)(50), adopted by ref erence in 18 AAC 50.040(h); . . . .”

2 18 AAC 50.040(i)(1)(B) reads as follows: “t he following provisions are not adopted, an d the terms defined in those provisions have the meaning given in 18 AAC 50.990:

(i) 40 C.F.R. 51.165(a)(1)(xxxvii) (“ regulated NSR pollutant”); . . . .”Dennis McLerran 2 February 11, 2014

If you have any questions or require additional informat ion, please contact Alice Edwards at (907) 465-5105.

Sincerely,

Larry Hartig

Commissioner

cc: Debra Suzuki, EPA Region 10 Kristin Hall, EPA Region 10 Donna Deneen, EPA Region 10 Alice Edwards, Division of Air Quality, ADEC John Kuterbach, Air Permits Program, Division of Air Quality, ADEC
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           17,611
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,815
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 23,426
<PP&E>                                           140,044
<DEPRECIATION>                                   85,046
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   82,987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            51,426
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         31,561
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     82,987
<SALES>                                          41,146
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 41,146
<CGS>                                            85,210
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    85,210
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 362,990
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (389,468)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (389,468)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.00



</TABLE>
exh10-7.htm


 










Exhibit 10.7


Amended Option Agreement







This Amended Option Agreement (this(“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of March 29, 2012 (the “effective date”) between Mr. Tang Weijiao and Ms. Cao Xiaoya, both residents of West Wenshan Road, Suite 117, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, people’s Republic of China (the “Purchaser(s)”) and Crown Union Resources Limited a British Virgin Islands company (“Seller”). Purchaser and Seller are also referred to herein together as the “parties” and individually as a “Party.”







NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the execution and delivery of the Agreement and other good an valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:







The original Option Agreement dated December 30, 2011shall become effective on the date when Peng Tuo Education and Technology Co., Ltd. (“PTIT”) provides China Education International, Inc. (“CEII”) PTIT’s audited financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 and unaudited financial statements for any completed three month period as of the date such financials are provided to CEII, all of which shall be prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied (“US GAAP”). The parties further agree that the PTIT financial statements will be provided to CEII no later than June 15, 2012 and that such financial statements shall be reasonably acceptable to CEII.







This Amendment shall be deemed part of, but shall take precedence over and supersede any provisions to the contrary contained in the original Option Agreement.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the dated first written above.







Purchaser:







Sign: /s/Tang Weijiao


       Tang Weijiao







Purchaser:







Sign: /s/Cao Xiaoya


       Cao Xiaoya







Seller:







Sign: /s/Joshua Kallan


         Joshua Kallan







Collateral Agent:


China Education International, Inc. as Collateral Agent







By: /s/Joel Mason


Joel Mason, Chief Executive Officer
ITEM: Bean Salad (BSA) MONOGRAPH NO.: KB12
VENDOR: Ameriqual

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE: 580

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Moderately congealed beans, carrots, red and green pepper

ODOR: Mild bean and vinegar seasoning
FLAVOR: Sweet, moderately spiced and cooked beans
TEXTURE: Firm bean, slightly oily

DEFECTS LIKELY TO OCCUR:

APPEARANCE: Dark color change

ODOR: Strong vinegar

FLAVOR: Bland or strong vinegar
TEXTURE: Softening, increased oiliness

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None

SPECIAL NOTES: None

43
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR


RULE
      15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Power Technology, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bernard
      J. Walter, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
              July 2,
              2007
            By:
            /s/ Bernard
              J.
              WalterBernard J. WalterChief
              Executive Officer andPrincipal Financial
              Officer
Opinion issued December 1 0 , 2012

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 2
- 00977
- CV

——————————— IN RE SHATISH PATEL, M. D., HEMALATHA VIJAYA N, M.D., SUBODH SONWALKAR, M. D., AND WOLLEY OLADUT, M.D., Relator s

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION On October 24, 2012, r elator s filed a petition for writ of mandamus , requesting that this court order the trial court to rule on a motion to compel responses to 67 discrete discovery requests

. *

* The underlying case is Patel et al. v. St. Luke’s Sugar Land Partnership, L.L.P. et al. , No. 201 1

- 24016, in the 152nd District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Robert Schaffer presiding.2

The mandamus record reflects multiple hearings and partial rulings on relators’ motion, as well as ongoing proceedings in the trial court relating to the motion. We conclude that, under the circumstances, the relators have not
demonstrated a refusal by the trial court to rule

. See, e.g. , Barnes v. State , 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.

— Hous ton [1st Dist.] 1992, no writ) . Accordingly, w e deny the petition for writ of mandamus without prejudice to re

- filing at a later
date

. We dismiss all pending motions.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes , Massengale , and Brown

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001067173
<NAME> SPG REALTY CONSULTANTS INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          23,546
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      499<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F2>
<PP&E>                                          33,397
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F2>
<BONDS>                                            991
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,744
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,754<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,150
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,283
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,013
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (742)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (193)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (549)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (549)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.99)
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are stated net of allowances.
<F2>The Company does not report using a classified balance sheet.
<F3>Includes limited partner's interest in the SRC Operating Partnership of $7,053.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
11 December 2020

NSN: 8940016928185

Item: Buffalo Style Macaroni and Cheese with Chicken Breast Meat, Dehydrated, Cooked

Document: PCR-B-063, Buffalo Style Macaroni and Cheese with Chicken Breast Meat, 

Dehydrated, Cooked, Packaged in a No. 10 Metal Can, Shelf Stable 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 310 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Dehydrated: Whole wheat elbow macaroni, chicken, carrots and celery covered in a 

buffalo style cheese sauce powder. Off-white to light tan elbow macaroni. Whole 

muscle fibrous shredded chicken breast meat off-white to light tan color. Orange carrot

and green celery pieces. Orange, free-flowing Buffalo style cheese sauce powder.

Rehydrated: Elbow macaroni, chicken, carrots and celery in a buffalo style cheese 

sauce. Discernible off-white to light tan macaroni, may have orange color from the 

sauce. Off-white to light tan shredded chicken. Orange carrot pieces and green celery 

pieces. Slightly glossy, semi-translucent and moderately thick sauce.

Odor:

Dehydrated: Slight to moderate spicy and vinegar odor. 

Rehydrated: Moderate spicy, vinegar sour odor, may have a slight chicken and 

macaroni odor.

Flavor:

Rehydrated: Cooked macaroni, cooked chicken, cooked carrot and celery in a seasoned 

buffalo cheese sauce flavor. The product shall elicit a sensation of mild to moderate 

heat.

Texture:

Dehydrated: No wet or soft spots indicating faulty dehydration.

Rehydrated: Rehydrated fully within ten minutes. Whole wheat elbow macaroni slightly 

firm to firm. Cooked whole muscle shredded chicken breast meat. Carrot and celery 

pieces soft to slightly firm. Smooth and moderately thick Buffalo style cheese sauce.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Dehydrated and rehydrated: Darkening, loss of color to sauce, pasta, carrots or celery. 

Odor: Dehydrated and rehydrated: Cardboard, oxidized, rancid, scorched, burnt, sour.

Flavor: Dehydrated and rehydrated: Cardboard, oxidized, rancid, scorched, burnt, sour.

Texture:

Dehydrated: Very hard, tacky, crystalline chicken. 

Rehydrated: Incomplete rehydration; chewy, dry chicken, carrots or celery; mushy 

pasta, excess water.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures 

N/A

Special Notes

 N/A
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

Monograph No.BS4 

21 September 1992 

NSN: 8920-00-435-4918

Item: Bakery Mixes, Prepared, Quick bread mixes, Yellow Cornbread (Class 2, Style A) 

Document: MIL-B-44275A, Bakery Mixes, Prepared 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: NA Component Classification: Secondary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 24 months at 80°F 

Item Characteristics

Appearance: 

Dry bakery mix shall be a free flowing mix free from lumps that do not fall apart under 

light finger pressure. Uniform light yellow color. 

Prepared cake shall possess a golden brown crust. The prepared cake shall be even 

grained cornbread. Slightly convex top surface free of cracks. Moist, yellow, slightly 

open textured crumb. No large gas pockets or tunnels. 

Odor: Prepared cornbread shall have a sweet baked cornbread odor. 

Flavor: Prepared cornbread shall have a sweet baked cornbread flavor. 

Texture: 

Dry mix shall be free flowing. 

Prepared cornbread shall be moist, tender, and slightly granular and show no evidence 

of lumps. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: 

Dry mix may darken in color and/or contain lumps that do not fall apart under light 

finger pressure 

Prepared cornbread may contain undissolved lumps and may not rise. 

Odor: Rancid, stale, oxidized, bitter, soapy, scorched, or other objectionable odors. 

Flavor: Rancid, stale, oxidized, bitter, soapy, scorched, or other objectionable flavors. 

Texture: 

Bakery mix may clump excessively, and not readily dissolve upon mixing or baking. 

Upon mixing the product may not readily attain a thick cornbread batter consistency. 

Prepared cakes may contain undissolved lumps and/or be dense due to not rising. 

Monograph No. BS4, Page 1 of 2 Pages 
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

Monograph No.BS4 

21 September 1992 

NSN: 8920-00-435-4918

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Prepare as directed on label. 

Monograph No. BS4, Page 1 of 2 Pages
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential.



# United States Court of Appeals

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC,

Appellant

v.

ARIGNA TECHNOLOGY LTD.,

Appellee

______________________

2023

- 1931

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021

- 01531, IPR2022

- 00737

.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App.

P. 42 (b). Case: 23-1931 Document: 42 Page: 1 Filed: 09/18/2024BMW OF N ORTH A MERICA

, LLC V

. A RIGNA T ECHNOLOGY L TD

. 2

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

September 18, 2024

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: September 18, 2024 Case: 23-1931 Document: 42 Page: 2 Filed: 09/18/2024
#### Florence E. URCIOLO et al., Appellants, v. William BATTLE, Appellee.

No. 18057.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Jan. 21, 1964.

Decided Feb. 6, 1964.

Mr. Herman Miller, Washington, D. C., for appellants.

Mr. Laurence Levitan with whom Mr. Paul H. Weinstein was on the brief, for appellee.

Before Fahy, Washington and Dan-aher, Circuit Judges.

*259PER CURIAM.

The appellee was injured as he negotiated his passage in a darkened hallway leading from a bathroom to a bedroom on the second floor of a 2-tenement house owned by appellants. The appellants had argued in the District Court that the appellee was a trespasser to whom they owed no duty and that, in any event, the appellee had been guilty of contributory negligence. The trial judge instructed the jury on various possible phases of the status of the appellee, whether as trespasser, licensee or invitee, as well as on the other issues raised. No exceptions were taken to the charge as given. Conflicts in the testimony and in the respective claims of the parties were resolved by the jury. We find no error.

Affirmed.