alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
5 December 2013 **********************************

NSN: 8940-01-266-1722 (NRM) * MONOGRAPH NO: MCW/LRP 62*

 ********************************** 

Item: Nuts and raisins (Type I)

Document: PCR-N-003, Nut and Fruit Mix, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 310 Component Classification: Primary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: Free flowing mixture of nuts (coated peanuts, coated walnuts, almonds, filberts, coated 

raisins). Free of clumped ingredients that cannot be broken with light finger pressure. 

Odor: Unsalted, shelled, roasted peanuts, walnuts, almonds, filberts, and raisins.

Flavor: Unsalted, shelled, roasted peanuts, walnuts, almonds, filberts, and raisins.

Texture: Firm to crunchy nuts and moist, chewy raisins. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Nuts, skins, and raisins darkened or clumped together. Nuts crushed or broken.

Odor: Stale, rancid nuts.

Flavor: Stale, rancid nuts.

Texture: Hard raisins. Nuts not crunchy.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Product is considered serviceable if clumps of raisins and nuts can be broken with light finger pressure.

Special Notes

This product pouch shall be nitrogen flushed or contain an oxygen scavenger. If defect such as 

oxidized or rancid odors or flavors exist, they are likely due to package failure or the absence of an 

oxygen scavenger. There may be some loose and/or detached skins and peanut splits.
No. 11-7373.

#### Matthew D. Reason, Petitioner v. Rick Coursey, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution.

565 U.S. 1164, 132 S. Ct. 1106,

181 L. Ed. 2d 990,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 902.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 4.1

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

$___, 000
Miami-Dade County, Florida                                     October ___, 1999

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, WORLD DIAGNOSTICS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the
"Maker"), promises to pay to the order of __________________________ (the
"Payee") on March 31, 2000, the principal sum of _______ Thousand ($__,000)
Dollars in lawful money of the United States, in hand or at the principal office
of the Payee as may from time to time be designated by the Payee. This Note
shall bear interest on the unpaid principal balance at the rate of Six Percent
(6%) per annum, payable at the time of the payment of the principal sum of this
Note.

         In the event of a default in the payment of this Note, then at the
option of the Payee, this Note shall bear interest computed from the date of
such default at one percent (1%) per month, but in any event not in excess of
the legally prescribed rate for instruments of this kind. The term "event of
default" as used herein, shall mean the failure of Maker to pay the principal or
interest due under the Note, which failure shall continue for five (5) business
days after notice of default, such notice to be delivered to Maker by
registered, certified or overnight mail duly recorded at the principal office of
the Maker.

         A provision hereof which may prove unenforceable under any law shall
not affect the validity of any other provisions hereof.

                                       22
<PAGE>

         Maker hereby waives presentment for payment, protest and notice of
protest and all other notices or demands in connection with the delivery,
acceptance, performance, default or endorsement of this Note.

         This Note shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida.

                                                     WORLD DIAGNOSTICS, INC.

                                                     By: ______________________
                                                         Ken Peters, President

                                       23
EXHIBIT 21


The following is a list of the significant subsidiaries of the registrant as of
March 10, 1999. Each such subsidiary does business under its corporate name.




                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

                                                    Jurisdiction of
Subsidiary                                          Incorporation

EID Corporation                                     Liberia
Ethyl Asia Pacific Company                          Virginia
Ethyl Brasil Aditivos S.A.                          Brazil
Ethyl Canada Inc.                                   Province of Ontario, Canada
Ethyl Europe S.A.                                   Belgium
Ethyl Foreign Sales Corporation                     U.S. Virgin Islands
Ethyl Interamerica Corporation                      Delaware
Ethyl Japan Corporation                             Japan
Ethyl Korea Limited                                 Korea
Ethyl Mineraloel-Additive GmbH                      Germany
Ethyl Petroleum Additives, Inc.                     Delaware
Ethyl Petroleum Additives Limited                   United Kingdom
Ethyl Services Limited                              United Kingdom
Ethyl Shipping Company Limited                      United Kingdom

















                                       55
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-1827

___________ Fred Jones, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Becker Group O & Fallon Division, a * Division of Becker Group, Inc.; * International Union, United * Automobile, Aerospace & * Appeal from the United States Agricultural Implement Workers of * District Court for the America, Local 282, * Eastern District of Missouri. * Appellees, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Missouri Department of Labor and * Industrial Relations, * * Movant. *

___________ Submitted: November 15, 1999 Filed: November 17, 1999

___________ Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________1 The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri. -2- PER CURIAM. FredJones appeals following the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment in his hybrid breach of duty of fair representation/breach of collective bargaining agreement

action under section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 185. He also moves for appointment of counsel. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we decline to appoint counsel, and we affirm on the basis that Becker Group O & FallonDivision had the right to discharge Mr. Jones under the collective bargaining agreement, and therefore that Local 282, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America did not breach any duty it may have had to represent Mr. Jones by failing to fully prosecute the grievance. See Blount v. Local Union 25 , 984 F.2d 244, 248 (8thCir. 1993) (union does not breach duty by failing to prosecute if plaintiff had no bona fide grievance against employer); Leeuwenv. U.S. Postal Service , 628 F.2d 1093, 1096-97 (8th Cir. 1980) (probationary employee had no right to continuing employment, so discharge could not be breach of collective bargaining agreement). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51279 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. CUAUHTEMOC AGUILAR-RAMIREZ, also known as Francisco Olvera-Ramirez Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:07-CR-1091-ALL
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Cuauhtemoc AguilarRamirez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. U nited States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008). United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April 2, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-51279

2 The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Sun River  Energy,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  January 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Wesley Whiting,  President of the company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Wesley Whiting
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Wesley Whiting, President
Date: March 17, 2008
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

QUINN WILSON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CHARLES L. RYAN; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 14-15960

D.C. No. 4:12-cv-00851-CKJ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 13, 2015** 

Before: LEAVY, CALLAHAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Quinn Wilson, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violation of his

right to freely exercise his religious beliefs under the First Amendment. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s

FILED

MAY 29 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
summary judgment and finding of qualified immunity, Tarabochia v. Adkins, 766

F.3d 1115, 1120 (9th Cir. 2014), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on the basis of

qualified immunity because defendants’ conduct did not violate clearly established

law. See Estate of Ford v. Ramierz-Palmer, 301 F.3d 1043, 1049-50 (9th Cir.

2002) (a prison official may be entitled to qualified immunity where he has a

reasonable, but mistaken, belief about the facts or about what the law requires in a

given situation). Contrary to Wilson’s contentions, the law was not sufficiently

clear that a reasonable official would understand he was required to provide a predawn meal, rather than a pre-sunrise meal, during Ramadan. See Anderson v.

Creighton, 483 U.S. 635, 640 (1987) (to be clearly established, “[t]he contours of

the right must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that

what he is doing violates that right”).

Wilson’s requests for counsel, set forth in his briefs, are denied.

AFFIRMED.

2 14-15960
ITEM: Lentil Stew (LSS) MONOGRAPH NO.: KB3

VENDOR: Wornick/SOPAKCO

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE: 295 to 531 Kilocalories.

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Thick, congealed, oily tan/brown sauce with small, dark brown lentils and
medium brown navy beans.

ODOR: Mild bean and spice.
FLAVOR: Slightly sweet, bland to mild bean with slight spice.
TEXTURE: Firm, slightly chewy bean; thick, congealed oily sauce.

DEFECTS LIKELY TO OCCUR:

APPEARANCE: Darkening of sauce and beans; excessively thick or thin sauce.

ODOR: Rancidity; increased bean, caramelized (cooked sugar).
FLAVOR: Rancidity; increased bean.
TEXTURE: Increased oiliness; excessive thickening or thinning of sauce.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: Heating of the entree will aid in
determination of the true consistency of the sauce, its oiliness, and rancidity.

SPECIAL NOTES: The skin of the bean may be separate from the bean, but should not be
considered a defect.

34
ITEM: Corn, Whole Kernel No. 10 size can (CWK) ************************

* MONOGRAPH: 2B2

(CWK) Secondary ************************

NSN: 8915-00-257-3947 ITEM SPECIFICATION: US Stds for Grades 

 US A or B

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Whole corn kernels. Color profile: Yellow; will lose some brightness 

after opening. 

ODOR: Typical of thermally processed corn with a slight sweet aroma.

FLAVOR: Typical of canned corn with a slight sweet flavor.

TEXTURE: Crisp corn kernels, chewy skins.

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36 months

 100 DEGREES F: 6 months

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

Appearance: Product may become slightly darker yellow-tan.

Odor: Slightly stale or bland.

Flavor: Slightly stale or bland.

Texture: Kernels may become softer or more fibrous. 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1162

NISHITH PATEL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HONORABLE ANNE ALBRIGHT; HONORABLE MARY ELLEN BARBERA; 

HONORABLE STUART BERGER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:21-cv-02409-GJH)

Submitted: December 29, 2022 Decided: February 3, 2023

Before WILKINSON and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nishith Patel, Appellant Pro Se. Kathryn Elizabeth Hummel, OFFICE OF THE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1162 Doc: 19 Filed: 02/03/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Nishith Patel appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

the district court’s order. Patel v. Albright, No. 8:21-cv-02409-GJH (D. Md. Oct. 26, 

2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1162 Doc: 19 Filed: 02/03/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
22 April 2014 ************************* 

NSN: 8915-00-530-3414 (OJI) * MONOGRAPH NO: BJ3

 *************************

Item: Orange juice, Instant

Document: PCR-J-002, Juice, Fruit, Instant

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 107 Component Classification: Ancillary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Powder: Uniform, free flowing, dry mixture, yellow-orange color.

Rehydrated: Orange color.

Odor: Powder: Typical of orange powder.

Rehydrated: Unsweetened orange.

Flavor: Powder: Typical of orange powder.

Rehydrated: Unsweetened orange.

Texture: Powder: Free of hard lumps.

Rehydrated: No discernible lumps and sediment free.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Powder: Not free flowing, dry mixture, browning or darkening of yellow-orange color.

Rehydrated: Darkening of orange color.

Odor: Powder: Burnt or scorched. Diminished orange.

Rehydrated: Burnt or scorched. Diminished orange.

Flavor: Powder: Burnt or scorched. Diminished orange.

Rehydrated: Burnt or scorched. Diminished orange. Bitter.

Texture: Powder: Not free of hard lumps.

Rehydrated: Lumps and sediment.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Initial examination should be in granular, dehydrated form. Final examination should be performed 

after reconstitution per package instructions.

Special Notes

NA
No. 11-5508.

#### Lonnie Oliver, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1063, 132 S. Ct. 758,

181 L. Ed. 2d 490,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8503.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 630 F.3d 397.
No. 11-7839.

#### Jose A. Garcia-Ortiz, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1171, 132 S. Ct. 1126,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1004,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 679.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 657 F.3d 25.
No. 10-11214.

#### Brian Edward Griffin, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.

565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1078,

181 L. Ed. 2d 796,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 560.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 873, 132 S. Ct. 229, 181 L. Ed. 2d 128, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7073.
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
      OFFICER
|PURSUANT TO                                              
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                  
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                   
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002            

I, John P. Thornton, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of NorPac Technologies, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2007, and to which this
      certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                             

| | By:    | /s/ John P. Thornton       
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | JOHN P. THORNTON           
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer    
| |        | and Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | February 19, 2008          

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Training, Knowledge and Opportunities (TKO) Seminar APEX ONLY

Email this event to me @

Invalid Email Address!Invalid Email Address!

Start Date/Time:

Tuesday, June 11, 2024 8:00 AM

End Date/Time:

Wednesday, June 12, 2024 4:00 PM

Recurring Event:

One time event

Importance:

Normal Priority

Category:

Meetings/Training/Seminars

Location:

Virtual/Online

Description:

The TKO seminar is a course that teaches vendors how to start doing business with DLA. Vendors learn how to find open solicitations, how to submit a quote through the DLA Internet Bid Board System (DIBBS), the procedures for viewing/downloading drawings, and how to use Invoicing, Receipt, Acceptance and Property Transfer (iRAPT) to get paid. There are also many other relevant topics of discussion. All sessions are free and held virtually.

Training is provided by DLA Land and Maritime in Columbus, Ohio, but benefits all DLA suppliers.

Registration must be made in advance.

Make reservations at: https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJIsdO2hqT8tHxIRW9aqKOtR6X5v7rAnvOY 

Enrolled Users:

Alandra Jones

                - Return
                - 
                - Export
ex1035.htm


Exhibit 10.35


 


 


Amendment to Employment Agreement







Reference is made to the Employment Agreement entered into between New Energy Systems Group and Junfeng Chen on November 1, 2009 (“Employment Agreement”). Pursuant to negotiation, the parties agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:








	
1.  

	
Jufeng Chen Shall keep serving as the CFO;








	
2.  

	
Jufeng Chen’s salary shall be changed from RMB10,000 per month to RMB80,000 per month;








	
3.  

	
The rest of the benefits shall remain the same.







 


 





	 	New Energy System Group	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Weihe Yu	 
	 	 	September 1, 2011