i

 APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

FOREWORD

DLA Troop Support -FTS

26 January 2017

(Supplementation is permitted.)

Appendix N is an aid for the inspection of Food Packet, Modular Operational Ration 

Enhancement (MORE). It provides guidelines for sampling, inspecting, classifying

defects, and determining lot serviceability.

Users of this publication are encouraged to submit comments and recommended changes to 

improve this publication, through channels, to DLA Troop Support, ATTN: DLA Troop 

Support-FTS Changes will be coordinated with the Military Services and implemented as 

appropriate.

BY ORDER OF THE COMMANDER

Signature Block

 

JOHN L. WOLOSZYN

Chief, Supplier Support Division

DLA Troop Support

DISTRIBUTION

Special

DLA Troop Support- FTR, FTRB, FTSC, FTSA, FTSB, FTW, USAPHC 
 APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PARAGRAPH PAGE

I. GENERAL. 1

A. Purpose and Scope 1

B. Explanation of Inspection Concept 1

C. Receipt Inspection Guidance

D. Cursory Inspections 1

E. Inspection Test Date (ITD) Extensions 1

F. Disposition Recommendations 1

G. Inspection Equipment 2

H. Definitions 3

II. ROUTINE INSPECTION GUIDANCE. 6

A. STEP 1. Cursory or Full Inspection 6

B. STEP 2. Evaluation of Storage Conditions 6

C. STEP 3. Determine If Grand Lotting Is Appropriate 7

D. STEP 4. Determine Lot Size 7

E. STEP 5. Inspect Shipping Containers and Select Food Packet Samples 8

F. STEP 6. Perform Closed Package Inspection of Food Packet 8

G. STEP 7. Perform Closed Package Inspection of Food Packet 9

Contents 

H. STEP 8. Perform Destructive Open Package Inspection (DOPI) 9

I. STEP 9. Recording Results 11

J. STEP 10. Determine if Special Inspection is Required 11

K. STEP 11. Determine Disposition 11

L. STEP 12. Provide Results and Recommendations to 12

Accountable Officer/Agency

M. STEP 13. Schedule Surveillance Inspection 12

III. SPECIAL INSPECTION GUIDANCE. 12

A. STEP 1: Determine Lot Size 12

B. STEP 2: Determine Sample Size for Each Component 13

C. STEP 3: Perform Inspection of Selected Components 13

D. STEP 4: Determine Disposition of the Lot 13

E. STEP 5: Provide Results and Recommendations to Accountable 13

Officer

ii
iii

 APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

IV. SAMPLING AND EXAMINATION TABLES. 14

Table A, Sampling Criteria for Inspection of Shipping Containers (Normal Inspection) 14

Table B, Sampling Criteria for Inspection of Shipping Containers (Special Inspection) 14

Table C, Inspection of Shipping Containers 15

Table D, Sampling Criteria for Inspection of Food Packet and Contents 16

(Normal Inspection)

Table E, Sampling Criteria for Inspection of Food Packets and Contents 16

(Special Inspection)

Table F, Inspection of Unopened Food Packets 17

Table G, Closed Package Inspection of Food Components 18

Table H, Sampling Criteria for Destructive Open Package Inspection (DOPI) 20

(Normal Inspection)

Table I, Sampling Criteria for Destructive Open Package Inspection (DOPI) 20

(Special Inspection)

Table J, Destructive Open Package Inspection (DOPI) 21

Table K, Specific Defect Codes 22

Table N, Condition Code Criteria Table 24

V. INSPECTION RECORDS. 25

A. Inspection Form 25

B. Database 25

C. Distribution 25
 APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

1

I. GENERAL.

A. Purpose and Scope. This Appendix provides a reference and guide for the surveillance 

inspection of Food Packet, Modular Operational Ration Enhancement (MORE) and was written 

and coordinated to facilitate use MOREs controlled by both DLA Troop Support and the 

individual Military Services.

B. Explanation of Inspection Concept. This Appendix incorporates the concept of 

condition coding a lot based on the serviceability of the various components contained within the 

different food packets and their estimated remaining shelf life. Basically, it involves a two-step

process: (1) Determine if any components exceed an action number and if so, (2) classify food 

packets containing the defective components using the criteria contained in Table N.

C. Receipt Inspection Guidance. For receipt inspections, use the same sampling criteria 

and defect tables as for surveillance. In some cases, a cursory inspection may be performed in 

lieu of a receipt inspection (see guidance on cursory inspections below). In addition, inspectors 

shall advise DLA Troop Support (AFESC / DEHF for Air Force inspection activities) when 

containers/products fail to comply with essential receipt criteria identified in the appropriate 

monographs. Notification should be by the most expeditious means when there is a possibility 

that warranty action can be initiated. Inspectors will be provided additional guidance concerning 

warranty inspection/actions if required.

D. Cursory Inspections. Cursory inspections are simply the visual inspection of palletized 

load and conveyance to determine if there is any obvious damage or contamination that occurred 

during transport. Cursory examination is only authorized for MOREs received directly from an 

assembly plant or for loads that received a full (not cursory) inspection at the installation from 

which the MOREs were received within the last 30 days.

E. Inspection Test Date (ITD) Extensions. Inspectors may extend an ITD based on their 

estimate of the lot's remaining shelf-life. Table N is provided to aid the inspectors in arriving at 

the best estimate possible without the benefit of laboratory testing. Remarking of the unitized 

loads/cases with a revised ITD will be accomplished in accordance with DLAM 4155.2, 

Appendix S, and/or the appropriate service regulation. Posting of extensions can be 

accomplished by posting stickers containing updated ITD information to each pallet or case.

F. Disposition Recommendations.

1. The accountable officer/agency will be informed of inspection results by the 

Veterinary/Medical Food Inspector. Inspectors will include (as a minimum): the condition code 

as determined with this Appendix, estimated remaining shelf-life, TTI stage, and a summary of 

general lot characteristics. Inspectors are also encouraged to provide additional comments and 

pictures that will assist the accountable officer/agency in determining a final disposition.

2. Final disposition instructions for lots placed on medical hold require review and 

approval by the local medical authority.
 APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

2

3. The points listed below should be considered when developing a disposition 

recommendation. This list is not all inclusive and each point will not always apply.

a. Can the defective food packet(s)/component(s) be removed or replaced just 

prior to consumption?

b. How rapidly is the most defective component expected to deteriorate to the point 

that it is likely to become unserviceable?

c. Can the lot be issued and supplemented/substituted with similar commercial items, 

Supply catalog items, or operational ration component(s)? Component replacement of MOREs 

can be completed successfully. If the actual troops consuming the rations never received the

recommended supplements/substitutes the inspectors, if possible, should:

1) Communicate with accountable officer to see if such a substitution is possible. 

(Note: If it can be determined that the substandard components deteriorated through some action 

or inaction that occurred prior to the military service taking possession from DLA Troop

Support, then normally DLA Troop Support will provide replacement rations or ration 

components. If the deterioration took place because of poor storage and transportation after the 

military service took possession of it, then supplements or substitution would be paid for by the 

accountable officer.

properly.

2) Follow-up on the supplement or substitution action to see if it was done

G. Inspection Equipment. The items listed below are recommended as the minimum 

necessary to perform the inspections of MOREs. However, this list is not intended to be

all encompassing.

1. Adequate lighting.

2. Magnification lens (3 to 5 power recommended) is optional.

3. Metal ruler (32nd inch graduation).

4. Paper plates.

5. Paper cups.

6. Paper towels.

7. Scissors, general use (must be strong enough to easily cut food packets and 

retort pouches.

8. Tape (for re-taping food packets and cases).

9. Permanent marker.

10. Number 2 stylus.

11. Sharp knife, box cutter, or scalpel that can be sanitized.

12. Alcohol swabs.
 APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

3

H. Definitions.

1. Monograph. An information and instruction sheet that provides the inspection 

activity with a description of a MORE component, including normal characteristics and signs 

of deterioration, as well as special instructions on how to examine the item. Special notes 

concerning inspection techniques are also included in some Monographs. Monographs can be 

accessed at http://www.dla.mil/TroopSupport/Subsistence/Operationalrations/qapubs.aspx

under Appendix N. 

2. Component Classification. The Monograph index (Table M) indicates the 

classification for each component. Component classification is determined by coordination of 

the Surgeon General and the Food Service Headquarters of the Military Services. Table M can 

be accessed at http://www.dla.mil/TroopSupport/Subsistence/Operationalrations/qapubs.aspx

under Appendix N. 

a. Primary. Any individual component in the MORE which, if unserviceable, 

will make the meal nutritionally inadequate for any method of intended use.

b. Secondary. Any individual component in the MORE which, if unserviceable, 

will reduce the nutritional value of the meal but will not render the meal unfit for its intended 

purpose.

3. Major A Defect. This classification should be used for defects that are likely to cause 

hazardous or unsafe conditions for individuals using, maintaining, or dependent upon the

product. The words “are likely to” are important. They do not mean “could possibly” since it is 

always possible to develop grand scenarios that transform trivial happenings into major 

catastrophes. Therefore, the use of this classification requires experience, prudence and sound 

judgment.

4. Major B Defect. These are defects that are not hazardous or unsafe. However, they 

may restrict the use of the product or make its consumption unlikely under the conditions for 

which the rations were originally designed. Examples: Extreme color (darkening), odor 

(rancidity), or flavor (bitterness) changes in primary components of a ration that make them 

unlikely to be consumed under normal field conditions where resupply or alternative feeding 

strategies are available. However, under more restrictive conditions the components could be 

consumed without concern that illness could be produced.

5. Minor Defect. These are defects that make the product less useful than it should be, 

but not seriously so. Minor defects usually do not affect serviceability. However, their 

identification is important since they often reveal early signs of deterioration and can be detected 

before the item reaches a condition that makes its consumption unlikely under conditions of 

normal use. Their early detection may lead to a predictive intervention by the accountable officer 

to ensure consumption before the component or food packet loses its serviceability.
 APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

4

6. Product Codes.

a. Assembly code information/Assembler’s lot number: Contract and component 

identification markings found on the shipping container or food packets that reflects ration 

assembly information only (e.g., assembly contractor, date of pack, assembly lot numbers, 

Inspection Test Date (ITD), etc.).

b. Component code information/component lot number: Item identification 

markings found on the primary package and, when applicable, the secondary package (e.g., 

thermostabilized pouch cartons) that reflects the producer's name, the USDA Establishment 

Number, the production lot number of the component, the nomenclature, etc.

7. Action Number (AN). A number which, when reached or exceeded, indicates 

additional inspection is necessary or indicates a component has deteriorated beyond acceptable 

limits.

8. Condition Coding. Traditionally, condition codes have been based primarily on 

estimates of remaining shelf-life. MORE serviceability will be determined based on the usability 

status of all food packets. However, to aid accountable officers in choosing the best disposition 

option, inspectors will provide them the best possible estimate of remaining shelf-life. A list of 

applicable condition codes and their descriptions are as follows:

a. Condition Code A (issuable without qualification): Refer to Table N.

b. Condition Code B (issuable with qualification): Refer to Table N. Accountable 

Officers are required to determine what qualifications will be specified in order to issue 

Condition Code B stock (e.g., issue with instructions to consume as soon as possible; or to 

replace specific components with supplements, provided that the inspector has determined that 

supplementary components are available).

c. Condition Code H (unserviceable - destroy in accordance with local policy): Refer 

to Table N. This classification will be used only when the entire lot has been deemed 

unserviceable.

d. Condition Code J (laboratory testing, medical hold rework, or reclassification

hold): Any item on hold pending laboratory analysis, rework, or awaiting authority for disposal.

e. Condition Code L (warranty action hold): Any item placed on hold pending 

warranty action.

9. Thermostabilized Component. Any component subjected to a thermal process in a 

closed retort approved by a process authority.
 APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

5

10. MORE Lot Serviceability. Two factors are considered when determining the

overall serviceability of a MORE lot. First the lot is condition coded using Table N and then the

integrity of the packaging and packing is considered. It is recognized that the status of a MORE

lot initially declared unserviceable may change as the result of a rework effort or special 

instructions provided by the accountable officer at/prior to issue.

11. Time-Temperature Indicator. A small label attached to the outer case used to 

monitor storage conditions. The TTI should be used as a tool only, and shall not be the sole 

factor for determining disposition of rations in storage.

12. Abrasion. A break or crack in the outer lamination of the retort pouch.

13. Fold-over wrinkle. Pouch material is overlapped on itself in the seal area

that reduces the closure seal to less than 1/16 inch.

14. Entrapped Matter. Foreign material may be trapped in the seal area, when the 

pouch is sealed or bonded. Entrapped matter weakens the seal, but as long as there is 1/16 inch 

of continuous seal all the way across the seal area (i.e. from one side of the pouch seal to the 

other), then the seal is considered acceptable.

15. Delamination. Delamination is the separation of laminated films in a flexible 

laminated pouch.

16. Stress Crack. It is possible that the foil barrier layer in the MORE pouch material 

may break, but the outer layer (lamination) of polyester is still intact. This would be called a

stress crack and it is not scored as a defect.

17. Barrier Layer. For a MORE retort pouch this is the lamination (foil) that 

prevents transmission of light, water vapor, or oxygen into out of the retort pouch.

18. Product Contact Layer. For a MORE retort pouch, this would be the

inner lamination (polyolefin) which is in contact with the food.

19. Adhesive. Bonding material that binds the laminations (thin sheets of

polyolefin, biaxially oriented polyamide, aluminum foil, or polyester) that make up the retort 

pouch material.

20. Inspection Module. In Operational Rations, the word module typically means a set 

of boxes whose combined content yields the components necessary to feed one meal to a given 

number of troops. For the purposes of MORE inspection, we will refer to a full/complete single 

case as an inspection module. This is meant to minimize confusion. The unit of issue is a single 

case (or box). In order to make sure that inspection covers all the food packets/components 

during inspections, inspectors will use the term “inspection modules”. An inspection module is a 

full/complete case.
 APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

6

21. Commercially Sterile. Food that is free of all pathogens and those spoilage 

organisms capable of growth during normal storage and transportation conditions. Normal 

transportation and storage temperature is defined as 80°F or less.

II. ROUTINE INSPECTION GUIDANCE.

A. STEP 1: Cursory or Full Inspection. A complete receipt inspection is required unless:

1. The MOREs are delivered to the installation directly from the MORE assembly plant; 

a full receipt inspection is not required. Inspect these deliveries only for transportation 

damage/obvious defects.

2. Normally, rations received will receive a full destination inspection. If the

depot that the rations were received from performed a cursory inspection, then a full receipt 

inspection shall be performed at destination. The MOREs are delivered from a depot or other 

installation and a current (within the last 30 days) inspection report, completed at the point of 

origin (for example, a depot, not another installation that received the same lot) accompanies the 

shipment. The accompanying inspection report should match the lot number and 

manufacturer/assembler information on the shipping container, plus the delivery origin.

B. STEP 2: Evaluation of Storage Conditions (Surveillance).

1. Storage conditions vary significantly. As a minimum MORE storage areas should be 

clean and dry. MOREs should not be stored directly on the floor. The area should be free of

pests in accordance with:

a. MIL-STD 904 (current version) Detection, Identification, and

Prevention of Pest Infestation of Subsistence.

 b. TM-38, Protecting Meals, Ready-To-Eat Rations (MREs) during storage. Although 

this is written for MREs it is still applicable to MOREs.

2. When multiple pallets of MOREs are warehoused, the storage facility should meet 

the additional standards of MIL-STD-3006 (current version), Sanitation Requirements for 

Food Establishments, Appendix A. MOREs cannot be stacked more than 4 pallets high 

without the use of storage aids, pallet racks/pallet sets, etc. These pallet racks/pallet sets 

should support the full weight of any additional pallets. The pallet (s) above shall not be in 

contact with or supported by the pallets beneath. Temperature history of storage locations 

must also be considered when recommending/determining when the next inspection is due.

3. All cases opened for inspection, or damaged, shall be recouped or repaired in a manner 

sufficient to ensure protection of the product during subsequent storage and handling.

Cases should be back filled so that no more than one case will have less than 24 food packets. 
 APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

7

C. STEP 3: Determine If Grand Lotting Is Appropriate.

1. Lotting procedures will be as follows:

a. Contractor's lots are composed of rations from the same assembly contractor, 

having the same contract number and lot number, and stored under substantially similar storage 

conditions.

b. Grand lots for the purpose of MORE inspections will be composed of rations

from the same assembly contractor that have the same contract number. Grand lots will contain 

rations from two or more contractor's lots as long as the contractor (assembler) and production 

year are the same. Additionally, the rations must have been stored under substantially similar 

storage conditions (Check the TTI values on cases from each contractor’s lot, they should be 

nearly the same). Samples from grand lots must represent all individual lots proportionally, even 

if the next highest sample size must be used. Identity of samples from each sub-lot must be 

maintained throughout the inspection. This will be done by marking the food packets with the lot 

code from the case that the packs are drawn from.

2. When the action number is reached or exceeded during normal inspection of a grand 

lot, complete the normal inspection of the grand lot and then perform a special inspection of the 

affected component(s) of the nonconforming lot(s).

3. Defective contractor's lots will be segregated from grand lots and inspected 

individually when one or more of the following occurs:

a. A Major A defect is found in the contractor’s lot.

b. The Major B or Minor defects found seem to be concentrated in one or more of the 

contractor's lots comprising the grand lot.

c. The inspector determines for any reason, based on initial inspection results, that 

inspection of each contractor's lot is necessary.

4. Grand lotting is encouraged (to conserve inspection resources) whenever it is 

considered appropriate by the inspection activity. Grand lotting will not be used when 

performing warranty inspections or on inspections of lots reported as possibly having 

wholesomeness deficiencies.

D. STEP 4: Determine Lot Size.

1. Lot size is expressed as the total number of inspection modules, food 

packets, or components as appropriate:

a. For inspection of shipping containers, verify total number of modules/cases.
 APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

8

b. For inspection of Food Packet, the sample unit is the pack, and the lot size would 

be the total number of food packets in the lot. To determine this, multiply the total number of

inspection modules by 24.

E. STEP 5: Inspect Shipping Containers and Selection of Food Packet Samples.

1. IAW Table A, select the appropriate sample size for shipping container examinations. 

Obviously damaged shipping cases should not be selected unless they are truly representative of 

the lot. Damaged cases should be set aside, inspected, and salvaged separately.

2. Using the defects listed in Table C, the inspectors should check each sample case

for loose straps, different type straps on one or more cases than those on the majority of the lot, 

or previously opened boxes. While these indicators may be the result of tampering, each may 

also be due to other reasons (e.g., a wholesale rework of a lot). Inspectors should contact their 

supervisors for guidance if pilferage or tampering is suspected.

3. Open the sample cases to determine how many different food packets they contain. 

The MORE was designed to have 3 menus, 8 packs each menu, 24 packs/box for Type I, 

High Altitude /Cold Weather and Type II, Hot Weather. Inspectors who encounter any other 

packing configuration should report it on the inspection report. 

4. Using defects listed in Table C, observe each case for signs of rodent damage or insect 

infestation (see DLA Troop Support Handbook 4155.2, paragraph XI.) Record infestation 

findings on the inspection report, to include:

a. Whether or not the pests were alive or dead.

b. Identification of the pests (preferably based on entomological or laboratory 

identification).

c. Probable origin of pests. 

d. Probable movement of pests. For example, from outside the shipping 

container into the food packets or vice-versa.

5. Classify each defective case by the most serious defect it possesses.

F. STEP 6: Perform Closed Package Inspection of Food Packets.

1. IAW Table D, select the appropriate number of food packets being sure the

samples are proportionally representative of the food packet in the lot.

2. If the inspection lot has been grand lotted, always mark each food packet with the
 APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

9

assemblers lot code from the case from which the pack was taken. Use a permanent marker, a

self-adhesive label, or some other method that will not easily rub off. The assembler lot code is 

a four-digit number (Julian Date) taken from the side panel of the case. In this way, if the

action number is exceeded, then the inspector can determine whether all the contractor’s lots 

require a Special Inspection. It is also recorded on the inspection report for each defect even if

the action number is not exceeded.

3. Inspect for defects listed in Table F.

G. STEP 7: Perform Closed Package Inspection of Food Packet Contents 

1. Open the food packet.

2. Food Packet components will be inspected for defects in accordance with Table G. 

When inspecting retort/thermostabilized pouches, use the following Non-Destructive Open 

Package Inspection (NDOPI) method:

a. Remove pouch from protective carton (if there is one). 

b. Lay pouch on flat surface; check for swelling.

c. Visually scan both sides of the surface of the pouch. Use the light source by 

changing the position of the pouch in relation to the light source to better spot anomalies, such as 

delamination. Run fingers along both sides of the pouch surface, particularly along the ridges

of wrinkled areas, feeling for breaks in the outer layer of the laminate. These will feel like small 

snags. Using a nylon is a good way to find abrasions or draw a stylus gently across the possible 

abrasion. It may also be helpful to examine possible abrasions with a magnification lens.

d. Press down firmly on the pouch, pushing the food towards the outer edge.

e. Look at the edge of the pouch, looking for indication that product has leaked 

through the pouch seal.

f. Examine the seal area around the pouch. Look for abnormalities.

3. Thoroughly examine all pouches within the food packet under a good light source and, 

if available, use a magnification lens. When a component exhibits more than one defect, it will 

be classified by the most serious defect it possesses. However, for the purpose of gathering

additional information, the lesser defects will also be noted.

H. STEP 8: Perform Destructive Open Package Inspection (DOPI).

1. Open package inspection will be performed in accordance with Table H and those 

defects listed in Table J. Select food packets that did not already have defects noted during the 

closed package inspection. Use the following procedures for inspecting each retort pouch and 
 APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

10

thermostabilized pouch in the DOPI sample:

a. Lay pouch on flat surface; check for swelling.

b. Visually scan both sides of the surface of the pouch. Use the light source by 

changing the position of the pouch in relation to the light source to better spot anomalies, such as 

delamination. Run fingers along both sides of the pouch surface, particularly along the ridges

of wrinkled areas, feeling for breaks in the outer layer of the laminate (abrasions). These will 

feel like small snags. Using a nylon is a good way to find abrasions or draw a stylus gently 

across the possible abrasion. It may also be helpful to examine possible abrasions with a 

magnification lens.

c. Press down firmly on the pouch, pushing the food towards the outer edge.

d. Look at the edge of the pouch, looking for indication that product has leaked 

through the pouch seal.

e. Examine the seal area around the pouch. Look for abnormalities such as foldover wrinkles or entrapped matter.

f. Using a sharp scalpel-type knife that is sanitary, make an “X” incision across 

the body cavity. Peel back the flaps.

g. Look at the food, smell it, and transfer to a plate for sensory exam.

h. Clean pouch and determine if the seam areas are intact by running a Number

2 stylus down the now exposed inner surface of the pouch seal area, and using a magnification 

lens if necessary. The purpose of this is to determine if there are weak seal areas or channels 

that were plugged by the food inside the pouch.

2. Inspectors should refer to the component monographs for information relative to the 

product's normal characteristics, the most likely deteriorative conditions to be observed and any 

unique inspection information and special notes concerning the item. Monographs for the 

MORE can be accessed at:

http://www.dla.mil/TroopSupport/Subsistence/Operationalrations/qapubs.aspx under Appendix 

N. 

3. Each component of the sample DOPI food packets will be opened and inspected. If

no Major A or Major B defects are noted and the action number for minor defects is not 

exceeded during normal open package inspection, this phase of the inspection should be

considered complete.

4. Classify each defective component by the most serious defect it possesses.
 APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

11

I. STEP 9: Recording Results.

1. Record the following information for all defective components:

a. Pack number.

 b. Assembler's lot number.

c. Component nomenclature and code.

d. Processor's and/or plant name (if available). 

e. Defect number.

f. Specific defect code (if applicable).

g. Narrative description of defect (if necessary). Note: Anytime an inspector uses 

the defect description for “other”, they will need to enter a description to complete the report.

h. Tally defects (Major A, Major B, Minor) according to type of components.

2. All components observed during the inspection with Major A or Major B defects

will be discarded (whether they are part of the sample or not). Components not exhibiting defects 

or those exhibiting only minor defects may be reassembled into the lot.

3. Component packages with a Major A or Major B packaging defect (other than 

swelling) should be opened to evaluate the effect the defect has on the product. Any findings 

should be recorded as a note on the inspection record. Do not taste product from defective 

pouches. NOTE: This inspection is an exception to normal destructive open package inspection 

(DOPI), during which product is given a sensory examination and compared to criteria found in 

the applicable monograph.

J. STEP 10: Determine if Special Inspection is Required. Special Inspection is 

normally required when any action number is reached/exceeded. However, there are rare

occasions when an action number may be exceeded and it may be appropriate to waive the

Special Inspection. This would normally be a situation in which it can be determined that there

is degradation throughout the grand lot. For example, a situation in which the entire lot is heat 

stressed or

infested. If the TTI value is 4 or 5 and the Normal Inspection shows that multiple components are 

heat stressed in numbers in excess of the action numbers. If a Special inspection is deemed 

necessary, go to Section III for procedures.

K. STEP 11: Determine Disposition. Disposition based on routine inspection results will 

be determined when no Major A or Major B defects were noted or the action number for minor 

defects combined has not been reached.
 APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

12

1. The Condition Code of a lot may only be downgraded based on Special

Inspection results or if a factor such as heat stress or infestation causes uniform degradation 

throughout the lot. (not sure if it is necessary to capitalize type of inspection, but it should 

be consistent.

2. If deemed necessary, samples may be submitted to the appropriate supporting 

laboratory. The lot will then be placed in Condition Code J pending results of the tests.

L. STEP 12: Provide Results and Recommendations to Accountable Officer/Agency.

2. Inspection results are reported in the US Army Public Health Center (USAPHC) database or

as required by local SOP. A fillable version of the DSCP Form 5117 at the following website:

http://www.dla.mil/TroopSupport/Subsistence/Operationalrations/qapubs.aspx under Appendix 

N. 

M. STEP 13: Scheduling the Next Surveillance Inspection.

1. Condition Code A – Reinspect in 6 months if this lot is in stock. If average storage 

temperatures are between 80-100°F, inspect within 3 months. If average storage temperatures 

are in excess of 100°F, inspect within 1 month.

2. Condition Code B – Reinspect within 3 months if this lot is still in stock. If average 

storage temperatures are between 80-100°F. If average storage temperatures are in excess of

100°F, inspect within 1 month.

III. SPECIAL INSPECTION GUIDANCE. During a Special Inspection, the inspector pulls

an additional quantity of only those components that met or exceeded the action numbers during 

the Normal Inspection. All defective samples will be classified by the most serious defect they 

possess. If you are performing a grand lot inspection and defects are present for a particular lot 

or lots, complete the Normal Inspection and then perform a Special Inspection on the lot(s) that 

require further examination. There may be situations in which it is not necessary to perform a 

Special Inspection. Normally this would be due to a deteriorative condition throughout the lot 

that is readily apparent during the Normal Inspection. Possible examples would be heat stress or 

infestation throughout the lot. When action numbers are exceeded, but the inspector believes that 

a Special Inspection is not necessary, then the inspector must discuss this with his chain-ofcommand and request approval to forego the Special Inspection. The approving officer and the 

reason for not performing the inspection will be documented on the inspection report.

A. STEP 1: Determine Lot Size. Initially determine lot size of the individual suspected 

defective components as determined during routine inspection (reached/exceeded 

action number). Each defective component will be inspected as a separate lot. To 

determine component lot size, you must determine which food packets contain the

defective component(s) utilizing Table S and the previous inspection results. These

food packets will be the only food packets selected for the special inspection.
 APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

13

B. STEP 2: Determine Sample Size for Each Component and Select Samples.

1. Sample size will be determined in accordance with Table B, E or I. Special

Inspections are performed only on contractor’s lots.

2. Inspect IAW applicable defect table (Table F, G or J).

a. The sample size for each component involved will dictate the minimum number

of cases that must be selected for special inspections.

b. Table S on the DLA Troop Support website can be used to determine the food 

packet arrangement for the ration lot in question. This appendix can be used by the inspector

to determine which lots to pull. The website address is: 

http://www.dla.mil/TroopSupport/Subsistence/Operationalrations/qapubs.aspx. 

C. STEP 3: Perform Inspection of Selected Components. This will be done in the same 

manner as performed on individual components during Normal Inspection, to include pouch 

examination, DOPI, and comparison with characteristics in the monographs.

D. STEP 4: Determine Disposition of the Lot.

1. If none of the ANs are reached or exceeded, each food packet is considered to 

be fully useable and the Condition Code of the lot may remain unchanged.

2. Compare defects noted with the ANs for each type of component (primary, secondary)

and use the criteria in Table N to determine the condition code of the lot.

E. STEP 5: Provide Results and Recommendations to Accountable Officer/Agency.

officer.

1. Complete DSCP Form 5117, and provide copy of report to accountable

2. Inspection results are reported in the US Army Public Health Center (USAPHC) 

database or as required by local SOP. A fillable version of the DSCP Form 5117 at the

following website: 

http://www.dla.mil/TroopSupport/Subsistence/Operationalrations/qapubs.aspx under Appendix 

N. 

3. For DLA owned stocks, inspections resulting in less than Condition Code A status 

must be telephonically reported to DLA Troop Support-FTSC (215) 737-4847/7771/7773/

(DSN 444).
 APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

14

IV. SAMPLING AND EXAMINATION TABLES.

TABLE A 1/ 2/

SAMPLING CRITERIA FOR INSPECTION OF 

SHIPPING CONTAINERS (NORMAL INSPECTION)

LOT SIZE

(CASES)

SAMPLE SIZE

(CASES)

DEFECT CLASS ACTION NUMBER

1-250 6 Major B 

Minor

1

3

251-17,500 20 Major B 

Minor

2

8

17,501-250,000 32 Major B 

Minor

3

11

> 250,000 50 Major B 

Minor

4

15

1/ For use with Table C.

2/ American National Standard ANSI/ASQC Z1.4-2003 was the basis for the sampling tables 

within this appendix.

TABLE B 1/

SAMPLING CRITERIA FOR INSPECTION OF SHIPPING CONTAINERS 

(SPECIAL INSPECTION)

LOT SIZE

(CASES)

SAMPLE SIZE

(CASES)

DEFECT CLASS ACTION NUMBER

1-75 3 Major B 

Minor

1

3

76-250 10 Major B 

Minor

2

8

251-600 16 Major B 

Minor

3

11

601-1,600 25 Major B 

Minor

4

15

1,601-5,000 40 Major B 

Minor

6

22

5,001-17,500 63 Major B 

Minor

8

31

> 17,500 100 Major B 

Minor

11

45

1/ For use with Table C.
 APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

15

TABLE C 1/ 2/

INSPECTION OF SHIPPING CONTAINERS

CATEGORY DEFECT

MAJ B MINOR

501

502

601

616

618

619

620

Evidence of rodent or insect infestation on or in 

the shipping container. 2/

Container damaged, contents exposed or 

affected.

Container damaged, contents not exposed or 

affected.

Missing TTI.

Shrink/Stretch Wrap is torn or does not cover

all four sides.

TTI is attached to case strap.

Exterior of case shows mold growth.

1/ For use with Table A and B.

2/ Requires immediate corrective action according to local Pest Management Program.
 APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

16

TABLE D 1/ 2/ 3/

SAMPLING CRITERIA FOR INSPECTION OF FOOD 

PACKETS CONTENTS (NORMAL INSPECTION)

LOT SIZE

(Packet)

SAMPLE SIZE 

(Packet)

DEFECT CLASS

AND ACTION NUMBERS

MAJ A MAJ B MIN

24 - 6, 000 9 1 1 11

> 6, 001 18 1 1 22

1/ For use with Table F and G.

2/ Sample packets will be selected from the shipping containers selected for the Table A

examination.

3/ All defects noted on food packets and contents will be combined and compared to the

normal inspection action numbers.

TABLE E 1/ 2/

SAMPLING CRITERIA FOR INSPECTION OF FOOD 

PACKETS AND CONTENTS (SPECIAL INSPECTION)

LOT SIZE

(Components)

SAMPLE SIZE

(Components)

DEFECT CLASS

AND ACTION NUMBERS

MAJOR A MAJOR B MINOR

24 – 36 ,000 9 1 2 9

> 36, 001 18 1 3 11

1/ For use with Table F and G.

2/ On special inspections, compare separate component inspection results to the action numbers.
 APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

17

TABLE F 1/ 2/

INSPECTION OF UNOPENED FOOD 

PACKETS

CATEGORY DEFECT

MAJOR MAJOR MINOR 

A B

503

514

602

Rodent damage/insect infestation of packet.2/ 

Less than 24 packets in a case.

Visible tear/cut/hole/open seam in packet.

1/ For use with Tables D and E.

2/ Requires immediate corrective action according to local Pest Management Programs.
 APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

18

TABLE G 1/ 2/ 3/ 4/ 5/ 6/ 7/

CLOSED PACKAGE INSPECTION OF FOOD COMPONENTS

CATEGORY DEFECT

MAJOR MAJOR MINOR 

A B

401

402

 

406

505

506

507

508

509

513

Swollen pouch. 3/

Tear/cut/hole/open seal in primary package

thermostabilized component.

Food Packet is missing an entrée.

Complete loss of food packet 4/

Tear/cut/hole/open seal in primary package

(other than those covered by defect 402).

Inadequate vacuum with moderate to extreme 

effect on product. 6/

Foldover wrinkle extending into the seal such 

that the closure seal is reduced to less than 1/16 

inch (retorted and thermostabilized pouches 

only).

Presence of entrapped matter (for example, 

product, moisture, grease, etc.) that reduces the 

closure seal to less than 1/16 inch, or seal area 

width not a continuous 1/16 inch around the

pouch.

Missing Secondary Component from food 

packet, or primary component other than 

the entrée is missing.
APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

19

605

606

607

609

610

621

Presence of delamination when multi-layered 

laminate is used. (not applicable to dehydrated 

components).

Inadequate vacuum, product not affected or 

only slightly affected. 6/

Unserviceable carton (e.g., carton missing, 

severely torn, flaps not glued).

Presence of delamination when multi-layered 

laminate is used. (dehydrated components).

Abrasion in the exterior surface of retorted or 

thermostabilized pouches.

Missing tear notch on food component 

1/ For use with Table D and E.

4/ Score when one or more defective components cause the entire packet to be unserviceable. For 

example, one or more leaking, ruptured, or contaminated packages may affect the other 

components.

5/ This defect does not apply to inner wrapper of freeze dried components.

6/ See component Monograph (defects 507 and 606 apply to vacuum packaged items only).

7/ See component Monograph.
APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

20

TABLE H 1/ 2/ 3/

SAMPLING CRITERIA FOR DESTRUCTIVE OPEN 

PACKAGE INSPECTION (DOPI) (NORMAL INSPECTION)

LOT SIZE

(Packet)

SAMPLE SIZE 

(Packet)

DEFECT CLASS 

AND ACTION NUMBERS

MAJ A MAJ B MINOR

24 - 6, 000 9 1 1 11

6, 000 or more 18 1 1 22

1/ For use with Table J.

2/ Sample packets will be selected from those shipping containers selected for the Table A

examination.

3/ All defects noted will be combined and compared to the normal inspection action 

numbers.

TABLE I 1/

SAMPLING CRITERIA FOR DESTRUCTIVE OPEN 

PACKAGE INSPECTION (DOPI) (SPECIAL INSPECTION)

LOT SIZE

(Components)

SAMPLE SIZE

(Components)

DEFECT CLASS

AND ACTION NUMBERS

MAJOR A MAJOR B MINOR

1 – 3 ,000 9 1 1 8

3, 001 - 6, 000 18 1 2 9

6, 001 - 36, 000 27 1 3 10

36, 001 or more 36 1 3 11

1/ For use with Table J.
APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

21

TABLE J 1/ 2/ 3/

DESTRUCTIVE OPEN PACKAGE INSPECTION (DOPI)

CATEGORY DEFECT

MAJOR MAJOR MINOR 

A B

403

404

405

510

511

512

611

612

613

614

Evidence of rodent damage/insect infestation in product.

/2

Product off conditions as evidenced by abnormal odor, 

color, flavor or texture suggesting contamination and/or 

spoilage for no apparent reason (e.g., package failure not 

evident).

Foreign material present, effecting wholesomeness (e.g., 

glass, metal, wire).

Primary component fails to rehydrate (moderate to 

extreme) or dissolve (extreme).

Moderate to extreme texture, odor, color or flavor 

change in a primary component not effecting 

wholesomeness (product unlikely to be consumed under 

conditions of intended use).

Mechanical damage to primary component significantly 

effecting serviceability.

Slight texture, odor, color or flavor change in a primary 

component not effecting wholesomeness.

Primary component fails to rehydrate (slight) or dissolve

(slight to moderate).

Moderate to extreme texture, odor, color or flavor 

change in a secondary component not affecting

wholesomeness.

Secondary component fails to rehydrate or dissolve

(moderate to extreme).
APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

22

615 Evidence of mechanical damage to secondary

component significantly affecting serviceability

(e.g., crushed gum).

1/ For use with Table H and I.

2/ Requires immediate corrective action according to local Pest Management Programs.

3/ Specify defect(s) observed. Enter all specific defect codes that apply and a narrative 

description when appropriate.

TABLE K SPECIFIC 

DEFECT CODES

A. INSECT / RODENT

A1. Rodent.

A2. Insect.

A3. Other (describe).

B. PACKAGING, PACKING, MARKING, LABELING AND UNITIZATION

B1. Essential case markings missing.

B2. Essential case markings illegible. 

B3. Essential case markings incorrect. 

B4. Essential Labeling missing.

B5. Essential Labeling illegible. 

B6. Essential labeling incorrect. 

B7. Improperly unitized load. 

B8. Unit load failure.

B9. Missing tear notch.

B10. Tear notches ripped or torn. 

B11. Sifter (see Monographs). 

B12. Inadequate vacuum.

B13 Delamination (separation of layers in laminate material). 

B14. Foldover wrinkle.

B15. Entrapped matter or seal area width not a continuous 1/16 inch around the pouch. 

B16. Abrasion.

B17. Sweller. 

B18. Leaker.

B19. Other (describe).

C. TEXTURE CHANGES

C1. Too thick or pasty.

C2. Chewy / gummy. 

C3. Mealy.

C4. Tough / stringy.

C5. Caked or hardened. 

C6. Brittle.

C7. Crumbly, cracking. 

C8. Excessively dry. 

C9. Loss of crispness. 

C10. Soft / mushy.

C11. Curdled.

C12. Gritty / grainy. 

C13. Spongy / rubbery.

C14. Syneresis (The contraction of a gel, or a homogeneous colloid system, when left 

standing separates into two phases: a coherent gel and a liquid. A good example
APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

23

is the separation or weeping of liquid of liquid from a gelatin mold when left 

sitting in a refrigerator too long).

C15. Liquefaction (passing from dry, solid, or semi-solid) to a liquid state (e.g., 

complete loss of gel structure in jelly component).

C16. Caramelized.

C17. Watery gravy or excessive product juices (probably due to product formulation 

and/or time-temperature abuse).

C18. Honeycombing.

C19. Coagulation/gelation (beverage base). 

C20. Other (describe).

D. ODOR CHANGES

D1. Medicinal, vitamin-like.

D2. Chemical odor, solvent-like/turpentine/paint-like. 

D3. Plastic-like.

D4. Hay-like (oxidized). 

D5. Fermented.

D6. Scorched/burnt. 

D7. Sulfur-like.

D8. Musty, moldy, mildew. 

D9. Overripe.

D10. Not ripe. 

D11. Stale.

D12. Cardboard. 

D13. Soured. 

D14. Putrid.

D15. Acidic/vinegary. 

D16. Other (describe).

E. FLAVOR CHANGES

E1. Loss of flavor, flat, bland.

E2. Chemical flavor, solvent-like, turpentine/paint-like. 

E3. Medicinal, vitamin-like.

E4. Plastic-like.

E5. Hay-like (oxidized). 

E6. Bitter.

E7. Burnt. 

E8. Soapy.

E9. Musty, moldy, mildew.

E10. Rancid (this may also be an odor change). 

E11. Stale.

E12. Fermented. 

E13. Earthy.

E14. Tart, acidic. 

E15. Overripe.

E16. Green, not ripe. 

E17. Tobacco.

E18. Sweet, perfume like, flowery. 

E19. Metallic.

E20. Excessively over-processed / scorched. 

E21. Canned.

E22. Putrid (this may also be an odor change). 

E23. Sour.

E24. Excessively salty. 

E25. Other (describe).
APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

24

F. APPEARANCE CHANGES

F1. Darkened.

F2. Bloomed, blotchy (e.g., chocolate).

F3. Oily, oiled-off (partial disintegration of an oil in water emulsion whereby a film, 

pockets, or droplets of oil form on the surface of the product or within the product).

F4. Off-color (e.g., pink, off-white, reddish, green). 

F5. Cloudiness (beverage bases except orange).

F6. Webbing (caffeine leeching). 

F7. Other (describe).

G. FOREIGN MATERIAL

G1. Potentially hazardous (e.g., glass, splinters, metal).

G2. Not potentially hazardous. 

G3. Other (describe).

H. COMPLETE LOSS OF PACKET (Does Not Consider Caloric Count)

NOTE: The purpose of this defect category is to enable inspectors and evaluators of the inspection data to properly 

identify packets that contained one (or more) leaking component that adversely affected the entire meal. For example, 

if an applesauce pouch leaks, the entire packet may be unfit for use because of the mold growth that would likely 

occur inside the food packet.

H1. Due to one leaking or ruptured component.

H2. Due to more than one leaking or ruptured component.

H3. Due to one or more components contaminated by insecticide/pesticide.

H4. Due to one or more components contaminated by an unidentified substance. 

H5. Other (describe).

J. MISSING COMPONENTS/PACKETS

J1. Required component(s) missing from packet.

J2. Required packets missing.

TABLE N 1/ 2/ 3/ 4/ 5/

CONDITION CODE CRITERIA

DEFECTS FROM SPECIAL INSPECTION RESULTS 

(COMPONENTS THAT EQUALS OR EXCEEDS AN 

ACTION NUMBER)

CATEGORY

CONDITION CODE A MAJOR A MAJOR B MINOR

Primary 

Secondary 

0

0

0

1

1

2

CONDITION CODE B

Primary 

Secondary 

0

0

1

2

2

3

CONDITION CODE H or J 

(see note 5)

Primary 

Secondary 

1

1

2

3

NA 

NA 

1/ Lots determined to be unwholesome will be classified Condition Code J until final disposition 

is made by the responsible veterinarian.
APP N

DLA Troop Support H 4155.2

25

2/ Each column lists the maximum number of components allowed to equal or exceed an action 

number for that category (Note this is the number of defective components with the same defect, 

not the total number of defects for the same component. For example, components that are

identical except for the flavoring are also grouped together. If both the Energy Gel, Orange and 

the Energy Gel, Lemon Lime show significant darkening, that would be one secondary

component with a Major B defect).

3/ Each row lists the maximum number of components allowed to equal or exceed an action 

number by component classification.

4/ Compare the number of components from the inspection that equals or exceeds the special 

inspection action numbers for each category. If the number in any row/column intersection is 

exceeded, the lot must be downgraded to the next lower Condition Code.

5/ For lots that fail inspection and do not meet a serviceable condition code, a condition code of J

or H is assessed. If it is necessary to send samples to the lab for food safety or production- related 

defects, or to investigate the lot further; then assess a condition code of J. If condition J is 

assessed, this will need to be revised once the lab evaluation or investigation is complete. 

Changing the condition code after the report is submitted is the responsibility of the report 

approver. If the defects have a readily explainable cause, such as heat stress, physical damage, or

infestation, then Condition Code H (condemnation) is appropriate. Condition Code L means that 

warranty action is pending. Warranty inspections will be directed by the contracting officer

and/or the chain-of- command. Inspectors who are asked to perform a warranty inspection will be

supplied with specific sampling and inspection instructions.

V. INSPECTION RECORDS.

A. Inspection Form. All inspections will be recorded on DSCP Form 5117. Local 

reproduction of DSCP Form 5117 is authorized.

B. Database. USAPHC operational rations database will be used to report MORE inspection 

results when available. 

C. Distribution. For DLA owned/controlled stocks, one copy of DSCP Form

5117 will be provided to the accountable officer. Copies of all reports will also be maintained in 

the local quality history files. For DLA owned stocks, inspections resulting in less than Condition 

Code A status must be telephonically reported to DLA Troop Support-FTSC (215) 737-

4847/7771/7773/ (DSN 444). Other distribution will be according to the directives of the

responsible inspection agency and/or Military Service.