alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Nov. 25 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE FAA Docket 2014- 0886

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Petition for Amendment of Section 333 Exemption Based upon Exemption 11204 

Issued to Build Imagery, LLC 

Dear Sir or Madam,

Build Imagery LLC (Build Imagery) herewith applies to amend to our existing 

Exemption 11204 issued to Build Imagery on March 11,2015 in FAA Docket 2014-0886. 

The requested amendment would allow Build Imagery to operate the DJI Phantom 3 PRO

manufactured by DJI. The Phantom 3 Pro offers unique Vision Positioning technology

that is necessary for some of the specific applications we encounter. The visual and 

ultrasonic sensors scan the ground beneath the flight area aide in its positioning accuracy

for safer flights.

The name and contact information for the applicant are:

Daniel Ursitti

Build Imagery LLC

11870 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 106-433

West Los Angeles, CA

310-467-6006

Dursitti@Buildimagery.com

Build Imagery intends to operate the Phantom 3 Pro and will operate it in strict 

compliance with the conditions set forth in Exemption 11204. We understand that such 

conditions may be amended or modified by the FAA from time to time and we will look 

to the FAA for guidance, recommendations and modification to always adhere to best our 

flight operations and procedures. Build Imagery will maintain all of its original "Aerial 

Systems Operations Manuel" and "Flight Checklist" as displayed in 11204. We will 

additionally submit

1) DJI Phantom 3 Professional User Manuel

These manuals are very similar to the manuals submitted by Build Imagery in support of

the issuance of Exemption 11204, the manuals will be updated by Build Imagery and or 

DJI as needed to reflect any changes to Exemption 11204, based on amendments thereto.

To the extent necessary, Build Imagery refers the FAA to the original exemption 

submitted by Build Imagery in Docket FAA-2014-0886 for demonstration of the public 
interest and an equivalent level of safety. Build Imagery will operate the aircraft in strict 

compliance with the conditions in existing the exemption previously granted by the FAA.

If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned.

Very truly yours,

Daniel Ursitti

Build Imagery

Dursitti@BuildImagery.com
No. 11-510.

#### Deloitte & Touche LLP, et al., Petitioners v. RGH Liquidating Trust, et al.

565 U.S. 1113, 132 S. Ct. 1016,

181 L. Ed. 2d 737,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 302.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.

Same case below, 17 N.Y.3d 397, 931 N.Y.S.2d 22, 955 N.E.2d 329.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     9
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
       

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,758
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                12,023
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     10,940
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         33,389
<ALLOWANCE>                                        444
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  64,960
<DEPOSITS>                                      44,994
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,607
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,710
<OTHER-SE>                                          14
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  64,960
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,908
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  664
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    95
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,667
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 751
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 762
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,905
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      120
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (39)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,379
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    103
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        19
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                        642
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   378
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       70
<RECOVERIES>                                        16
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  444
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               444
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0

        

</TABLE>
TORN OR MUTILATED, OR TORN OR SCRATCHED, 

OBLITERATING ANY MARKINGS ON THE LABEL 

(MILITARY PURCHASES) 

Table VIII, Defect No. 202 – Minor defect (nonmilitary 

purchases). Defect No. 103 – Major defect (Military purchases).
FILED

December 21, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

JORGE ARIEL SANJINES ) Appeal 

) No. 03-S-01-9712-CV-00139

Plaintiff-Appellee )

)

v. ) Hamilton County

) No. 96-CV-0347

ORTWEIN AND ASSOCIATES, P.C., )

WILLIAM H. ORTWEIN, and )

J. CRIS HELTON ) Judgment of the Court of

) Appeals is REVERSED

Defendants-Appellants )

 

JUDGMENT ORDER

 

This cause came to be heard upon the briefs, argument of

counsel, and the record on appeal from the Court of Appeals. 

The Court is of the opinion that under the facts of this

case, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to

grant the appellee a stay of the legal malpractice case during the

pendency of the post-conviction matter alleging ineffective

assistance of counsel. In accordance with the opinion filed

herewith, it is therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by this Court that

the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

Costs of the appeal are taxed against the appellee, for

which execution may issue if necessary.

12/21/98
No. 11-8705 (11A758).

#### Edwin Hart Turner, Petitioner v. Christopher B. Epps, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 1187, 132 S. Ct. 1306,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1035,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1067.

February 8, 2012.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 460 Fed. Appx. 322.
# C_2018238EN.01040901.xml

| 6.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/409 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/409

---

P8_TA(2016)0500

Nomination of a Member of the Court of Auditors — Juhan Parts

European Parliament decision of 14 December 2016 on the nomination of Juhan Parts as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C8-0445/2016 — 2016/0817(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2018/C 238/30)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0445/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0445/2016),

| — | having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0375/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0375/2016),

| A. | whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

| B. | whereas at its meeting of 5 December 2016 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

B.

whereas at its meeting of 5 December 2016 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors;

| 1. | Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Juhan Parts as a Member of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Juhan Parts as a Member of the Court of Auditors;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.

---
No. 11-336.

#### John M. Corboy, et al., Petitioners v. David M. Louie, Attorney General of Hawaii, et al.

565 U.S. 1091, 132 S. Ct. 865,

181 L. Ed. 2d 547,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8979.

December 12, 2011.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.

Same case below, 128 Hawaii 89, 283 P.3d 695.
No. 11-625.

#### Hogenson R&R Investors, Petitioner v. A.F.T.E.R., Incorporated, et al.

565 U.S. 1178, 132 S. Ct. 1144,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1019,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1041.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 434 Fed. Appx. 907.
Exhibit 35.1  LOGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1050-084, 8th Fl
401 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Service Agreement dated as of August 1, 2017, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer, TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer, CITIBANK, N.A., as
Certificate Administrator and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, as Trustee with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-B1 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have
the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial
Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:  1.
A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.  LOGOLeslie Hayton Managing Director
Wells Fargo Bank   Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.



LOGO
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Charles Deng Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Gomez, Sarae, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>ELRAC, Inc., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Joseph D. DePalma, Esq.), for appellant.Carman, Callahan &amp; Ingham, LLP (Jeffrey P. Saxon, Esq.), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (William A. Viscovich, J.), entered July 1, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the branches of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover for services billed under CPT codes 97810 and 97811.</p><p>ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court as granted the branches of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover for services billed under CPT codes 97810 and 97811.</p><p>Plaintiff argues that defendant failed to establish that defendant's fee reductions, which had been done in accordance with the workers' compensation fee schedule for acupuncture services performed by chiropractors, were proper. However, this court has held, "as a matter of law, that an insurer may use the workers' compensation fee schedule for acupuncture services performed by chiropractors to determine the amount which a licensed acupuncturist is entitled to <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>receive for such acupuncture services" (<a href="../2009/2009_29467.htm" target="_blank"><i>Great Wall Acupuncture, P.C. v Geico Ins. Co.</i>, 26 Misc 3d 23</a>, 24 [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2009]).</p><p>Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed. </p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.</p><br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: September 08, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
No. 11-7563.

#### Frank Pierre, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1135, 132 S. Ct. 1060,

181 L. Ed. 2d 778,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 36.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 435 Fed. Appx. 905.
No. 11-7622.

#### Constance V. Melkonian, Petitioner v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, et al.

565 U.S. 1182, 132 S. Ct. 1151,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1024,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1019.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 610.
REPORT OF INSPECTION ON _____________ OPERATIONAL RATIONS 

 (ENTER TYPE OF RATION) PAGE 1 OF ___

PART I - INSPECTION ACTIVITY INFORMATION

INSPECTOR: P DATE OF INSPECTION: P

SECTION: P BRANCH: P

DISTRICT: P REGION: P

PART II – INSPECTED UNIT INFORMATION

INSTALLATION: P UNIT NAME: P

STORAGE LOCATION OF RATIONS: P RATIONS RECEIVED FROM: P

PART III – RATION ASSEMBLER INFORMATION

CONTRACT NUMBER: P ___ NA ASSEMBLER: P

PART IV – INSPECTION INFORMATION

CLASS OF INSPECTION: P TYPE OF INSPECTION: ___ ROUTINE ___ SPECIAL P

TYPE OF INSPECTION LOT:

 ___ GRAND ___ CONTRACTORS/ASSEMBLERS

LOT SIZE: LOT INFORMATION:

PART V – INSPECTION RESULTS

CONDITION CODE: ___ A ___ B ___ C ___ H ___ J ___ L P NEXT INSPECTION DUE: P

SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIRED: ___ NO ___ YES P TTI STATUS: ___ 0 ___ 1 ___ 2 ___ 3 ___ 4 ___ 5 P ___ NA ___ MISSING

STORAGE CONDITION: ___ REFRIGERATED ___ NON-REFRIGERATED P STORAGE TEMPERATURE: ___ <80*F ___ >80*F P ___ UNKNOWN

PART VI - SAMPLING PLANS

RATION COMPONENT

(SPECIAL ONLY)

DEFECT

TABLE 

 SAMPLING

TABLE

SAMPLE 

SIZE

DEFECT

CLASS

ACTION 

NUMBER

TOTAL 

DEFECTS

DEFECTS BY COMPONENT 

CLASSIFICATION

PRIMARY - 

SECONDARY - NA

ANCILLARY -

PRIMARY - 

SECONDARY - NA

ANCILLARY -

PRIMARY - 

SECONDARY - NA

ANCILLARY -

PRIMARY - 

SECONDARY - NA

ANCILLARY -

PRIMARY - 

SECONDARY - NA

ANCILLARY -

PRIMARY - 

SECONDARY - NA

ANCILLARY -

PRIMARY - 

SECONDARY - NA

ANCILLARY -

PRIMARY - 

SECONDARY - NA

ANCILLARY -

PRIMARY - 

SECONDARY - NA

ANCILLARY -

DSCP FORM 5117 (FRONT), JULY 2001 (FOR USE OF THIS FORM, SEE DSCPH 4155.2, APPROPRIATE APPENDIX)
REPORT OF INSPECTION ON _____________ OPERATIONAL RATIONS (CONT) 

 (USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECCESSARY) PAGE ___ OF ___

PART VII – NONCONFORMANCE SUMMARY d

DEFECT TALLY*

Primary Secondary Ancillary N

/

A

ASSEMBLER 

LOT NO.

MENU 

NO.

COMPONENT

& 

CODE

COMPONENT 

PROCESSOR

DEFECT

TABLE

DEFECT

NO.

DEFECT 

CODE

DESCRIPTION

OF DEFECTS/REMARKS

A B M A B M A B M

* A = MAJ A, B = MAJ B, M = MINOR, N/A = Items with no Component Classification (Primary, Secondary, Ancillary)

DEFECT TOTALS

PART VIII - NARRATIVE COMMENTS

PART IX – SIGNATURE BLOCK

NAME / SIGNATURE OF INSPECTOR DATE NAME / SIGNATURE OF SUPERVISOR TELEPHONE NO. DATE

DSCP FORM 5117 (BACK), JULY 2001 (FOR USE OF THIS FORM, SEE DSCPH 4155.2, APPROPRIATE APPENDIX)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Shasta County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet at the USDA Service Center in Redding, California, on March 12, 2009 from 8:30 a.m. to 12 noon; April 9, 2009 from 8:30 a.m. to 12 noon; May 27 and 28, 2009 from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The purpose of these meetings is to discuss proposed projects under Title II of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2008.

# DATES:

Thursday, March 12, 2009; Thursday, April 9, 2009; Wednesday and Thursday, May 27 and 28, 2009.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the USDA Service Center, 3644 Avtech Parkway, Redding, California 96002.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Resource Advisory Committee Coordinator John Heibel at (530) 226-2524 or                         *jheibel@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Public input sessions will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the Shasta County Resource Advisory Committee.

Dated: February 17, 2009.

J. Sharon Heywood,

Forest Supervisor, Shasta-Trinity National Forest.

[FR Doc. E9-4117 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-10-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                          46,482
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   97,498
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,306
<INVENTORY>                                    121,651
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               279,380
<PP&E>                                          53,084
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 445,855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          103,301
<BONDS>                                        168,234
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,407
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   445,855
<SALES>                                          2,274
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,274
<CGS>                                            2,174
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,554
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 982
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,113)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,497)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,616)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,616)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.18

 

Compensatory Arrangements with Executive Officers

 

Base Salary

 

The current annual base salaries of each of the executive officers of PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”) are as follows:

 

	
Mark R. Tauscher, President and Chief Executive   Officer
    	
 
    	
$
    	
310,247
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Gregory W. Mann, Chief Financial Officer
    	
 
    	
$
    	
120,000
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Kenneth J. Luppi, Vice President of Operations
    	
 
    	
$
    	
164,625
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Vincent C. Puglisi, Managing   Director, International
    	
 
    	
$
    	
161,537
    	
 
    


 

Other Compensation

 

Mr. Tauscher currently receives an annual car allowance of $12,000.  Mr. Luppi and Mr. Puglisi each currently receive an annual car allowance of $6,000.

 

The Compensation Committee may also, from time to time, award each of the executive officers compensation in the form of stock options granted under the Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended.
DENT 

Table IV, Defect No. 208 – Lower limit of a minor defect. A 

moderately deep, sharp, angular indentation with little crimping 

of the body wall.