alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016119EN.01000601.xml

| 5.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/6

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 119/07)

| Member State | Ireland |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Conamara (Na Mine) Airport – Árainn
  Conamara (Na Mine) Airport – Inis Meáin – Inis Óirr |
| Period of validity of the contract | 1 October 2016 – 30 September 2020 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 60 days after the date of publication of tender invitation. Tender Documents will be available from 1 April 2016. |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the modified public service obligations can be obtained | For further information please contact:





  Office of Government Procurement |
| Department of Public Expenditure and Reform |
| 3A Mayor Street Upper |
| Spencer Dock |
| Dublin 1 |
| IRELAND |
| http://www.etenders.gov.ie/ |
| Tel. +353 176 1008103 |
| Contact persons: |
| Donal D’Arcy |
| E-mail: Donal.D’arcy@ogp.gov.ie |
| Ciaran Bayly |
| E-mail: Ciaran.Bayly@ogp.gov.ie |

Member State

Ireland

Concerned routes

Conamara (Na Mine) Airport – Árainn

Conamara (Na Mine) Airport – Inis Meáin – Inis Óirr

Period of validity of the contract

1 October 2016 – 30 September 2020

Deadline for submission of tenders

60 days after the date of publication of tender invitation. Tender Documents will be available from 1 April 2016.

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the modified public service obligations can be obtained

For further information please contact:

Office of Government Procurement

Department of Public Expenditure and Reform

3A Mayor Street Upper

Spencer Dock

Dublin 1

IRELAND

http://www.etenders.gov.ie/

Tel. +353 176 1008103

Contact persons:

Donal D’Arcy

E-mail: Donal.D’arcy@ogp.gov.ie

Ciaran Bayly

E-mail: Ciaran.Bayly@ogp.gov.ie

---
*********************** 

MONOGRAPH NO: 1C7 

 **************************** 

ITEM: Pork and Beans (P&B) (PRIMARY) 

NSN: 8940-01-147-7853 ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR-P-029 Can 

 MIL-P-44242 

 8940-01-455-1879 PCR-P-030 Poly 

 8915-01-184-5601 #10 Can CID A -A-20134 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM: 

APPEARANCE: Small beans, small bacon pieces: Medium-thick sauce. 

COLOR: medium brown beans, dark brown bacon pieces, red-brown sauce 

ODOR: Typical of sweet molasses-type baked beans with a slight smoked bacon 

aroma 

FLAVOR: Sweet, starchy baked beans with a very slight tomato and bacon 

flavor. 

TEXTURE: Soft, tender starchy beans; slightly chewy bacon. 

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36 months 

 100 DEGREES F: 6 months 

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES: 

APPEARANCE: Beans and sauce may become darker in color. Odor: Product 

may become less sweet and smoky in aroma. 

FLAVOR: Product may exhibit some overall flavor loss (mainly spice and 

smoke) 

TEXTURE: Beans may become a little bit drier; mushy, or tough. 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None: 

 Updated 05/24/06
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Janus Capital Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory A. Frost,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)        The report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        The information contained in the reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|  /s/ Gregory A.  Frost   |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| Gregory A. Frost              |
| Executive Vice  President and |
| Chief Financial Officer       |

 

Date: April 24, 2008

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to JanusCapital Group Inc. and will be retained by Janus Capital Group Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
No. 11-7467.

#### Jerome Clarke, Petitioner v. Shirley Evans, et al.

565 U.S. 1167, 132 S. Ct. 1114,

181 L. Ed. 2d 996,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 740.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Georgia, Fulton County, denied.
No. 11-7436.

#### Kenneth Thornton, Petitioner v. Cheryl Price, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 1165, 132 S. Ct. 1111,

181 L. Ed. 2d 994,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 843.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
#### J. E. McCullough and John D. Hobbs, *Appellants,*v. Ward-Hamilton, a Corporation, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed April 29, 1926.

*Leitner & Leitner,*for Appellants;

*Treadwell & Treadwell,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the orders herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said orders; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said orders of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
No. 11-6636.

#### In re Victor Del Rio, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 1078, 132 S. Ct. 818,

181 L. Ed. 2d 542,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8697.

December 5, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis *543denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS FOR FORM 10-Q**
I, Bruce R. Knooihuizen, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AmericanCellular Corporation (the “registrant”);
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and wehave:
     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report isbeing prepared;
     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an quarterly report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
August 13, 2004      AMERICAN CELLULAR CORPORATION
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RODERICK L. MITCHELL,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

ROXAN SANDERS; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-16929

D.C. No. 2:08-cv-02284-FCDCMK

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Frank C. Damrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 27, 2011** 

Before: SILVERMAN, W. FLETCHER, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Roderick L. Mitchell, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

FILED

OCT 11 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-16929

§ 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 12(b)(6), Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir. 2010), and for an

abuse of discretion a dismissal without leave to amend, Halet v. Wend Inv. Co.,

672 F.2d 1305, 1310 (9th Cir. 1982). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the action because Mitchell failed to

state sufficient facts to show that defendants acted with deliberate indifference to

his carpal tunnel condition. See Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1058 (9th Cir.

2004) (a prison official acts with deliberate indifference only if he or she knows of

and disregards an excessive risk to the prisoner’s health and safety, and a

difference in medical opinion is insufficient to establish deliberate indifference). 

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Mitchell’s

complaint without leave to amend because amendment would have been futile. See

Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1130 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (a district court need

not grant leave to amend if the defects of the complaint cannot be cured).

Mitchell’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
**
Exhibit 34.2 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP) 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

U.S. Bank National Association 

We have examined management’s****assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment ofCompliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the U.S.Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities****Platform (the “Platform”), for which the Company provides trustee, securities administration, registrar and paying agent services, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2020, exceptfor****servicing criteria Items 1122 (d)(1)(i)-(v), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(v)-(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), and 1122 (d)(4)(i)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respectto the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’scompliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established bythe American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise thePlatform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred eitherprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that the evidencewe obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedservicing criteria as of and for the year ended March 31, 2020, for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Minneapolis,Minnesota 

May 28, 2020 

 
**
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-20712

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HUMBERTO YECID CASTRO GOMEZ, also known as Humberto Yacid 

Castro, also known as Humberto Castro Gomez, also known as Humberto 

Yacid Castro Gomez, also known as Robert Gomez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:14-CR-201-1

Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Humberto Yecid Castro 

Gomez raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Teran-Salas, 

767 F.3d 453, 458-62 (5th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 1892 (2015). In 

Teran-Salas, we determined that the appellant was not entitled to relief based 

merely on the existence of a theoretical possibility that the defendant could be 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 18, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-20712 Document: 00513157852 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2015
No. 14-20712

2

convicted under Texas Health & Safety Code § 481.112(a) for conduct that 

would not qualify as a federal drug trafficking offense. See Teran-Salas, 767 

F.3d at 458. Castro Gomez has not demonstrated “a realistic probability that 

Texas would prosecute under an ‘administering’ theory in a way that does not 

also constitute either ‘dispensing’ or ‘distributing’ under the federal sentencing 

guidelines.” Id. at 461-62.

Castro Gomez also raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States 

v. Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d 198, 204-05 (5th Cir. 2015), petition for cert. filed

(June 19, 2015) (No. 14-10355). In Martinez-Lugo,782 F.3d at 204-05, we held 

that an enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) for a prior conviction 

of a drug trafficking offense is warranted regardless whether a conviction for 

the prior offense required proof of remuneration or commercial activity.

The motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative 

motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of 

the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 14-20712 Document: 00513157852 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2015
2011 Addendum to Employment Agreement


 


THIS ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this "Addendum")
is made this 30th day of June, 2011 between Shengtai Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (the “Company”) and Qingtai Liu (“Employee”)


 


WHEREAS, the Employee and the Company entered
into an Employment Agreement on July 8, 2009 (“Employment Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, the Company was in need of cash
flow for its operations and development and the Employee agreed to reduce his salary under Section 4 of the Employment Agreement
from $120,000 to $18,564;


 


WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to set
out the understanding reached between them in a written agreement;


 


NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES that
in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties hereto covenant and agree
as follows:


 


	1.	The annual salary of the Employee in fiscal year 2011 shall be $18,564.
	 	 



	2.	Except as otherwise specifically stated herein, the terms of the Employment Agreement (including
the exhibits thereto) shall remain in full force and effect.



 


 


-- Signature page follows
--


 






    	 



    	 	



    
 





IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.


 


 


	
        EMPLOYEE:

         

         

         

        /s/ Qingtai Liu               

        Qingtai Liu

         
	 	
        SHENGTAI PHARMACEUITICAL, INC.

         

         

        By: /s/ Qingtai Liu                   




        Qingtai Liu

        Chief Executive Officer
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22 - 0605

_________________ SH ANNON FALKENHAGEN,

Petitioner and Appellant, v. ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee. O R D E R

_________________ Pur suant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable David J. Grubich , D istrict Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 10 2023

05/10/2023
Case Number: DA 22-0605
***********************

 * MONOGRAPH NO: 1A9

***********************

ITEM: Omelet w/Bacon and Cheese (OBC)

NSN: 8940-01-237-9832 ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR-O-0001 Can

 8940-01-470-3145 MIL-O-44248 Poly

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 356 (PRIMARY)

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Light yellow-tan (w/slight gray-green tone) egg mixture with small 

reddish-brown bacon pieces

ODOR: Cooked egg, smoked meat, with a slight cheese aroma

FLAVOR: Typical of a cooked egg product containing a smoked meat item or 

smoke flavoring with a slight salt, smoke, and cooked cheese flavor.

TEXTURE: A slightly moist, soft tender egg mixture with tender chewy bacon 

bits.

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36 months

 100 DEGREES F: 6 months

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

Appearance: Product may darken; surface will exhibit change before interior.

Odor: Product will exhibit a slightly stronger bacon and/or cheese odor; cooked egg 

aroma will be more noticeable.

Flavor: Cheese and bacon flavors may become stronger.

Texture: Egg mixture will become firmer and product may become rubbery.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None.

SPECIAL NOTES: Can is designed to yield 18 portions of approximately 2/3 cup 

each (161 grams).
Exhibit 35.24  LOGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1050-084, 8th Fl
401 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334  ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2017, by and among CCRE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE
SECURITIES, L.P., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate
Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer and with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-C8 (the Agreement).
Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this
Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:  1.
A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.  LOGOLeslie Hayton Managing Director
Wells Fargo Bank    Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

LOGO
No. 11-5953.

#### Joseph Murray, Petitioner v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services, et al.

565 U.S. 981, 132 S. Ct. 503,

181 L. Ed. 2d 354,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7800.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 12 A.3d 1173.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4720 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

200 Gateway Drive in Lincoln, California, as the ‘‘Beverly J. Wilson 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2006 

Mr. DOOLITTLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 200 Gateway Drive in Lincoln, California, 

as the ‘‘Beverly J. Wilson Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BEVERLY J. WILSON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 200 Gateway Drive in Lincoln, 

6 California, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Beverly 

7 J. Wilson Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
2 

•HR 4720 IH 

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Beverly J. Wilson 

3 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ