alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 145 (Wednesday, July 29, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 40363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20116]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 98-ACE-6]


Amendment to Class D and Class E Airspace; St. Joseph, MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action withdraws the Direct final rule, request for 
comments mending the Class D and Class E airspace designations at St. 
Joseph, MO. The Direct final rule, request for comments is being 
withdrawn due to an error in the original Docket 98-ACE-6 (63 FR 
20528), published April 27, 1998 and a delay in publication of the 
correction. Therefore, a determination has been made to withdraw the 
Direct final rule, request for comments and resubmit it at a later 
date.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This withdrawal is effective July 29, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520C, Federal Aviation Administration, 601 East 
12th Street, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 426-3408.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Direct Final Rule

    On April 27, 1998, a Direct final rule, request for comments was 
published in the Federal Register to amend the Class D and Class E 
airspace designations at St. Joseph, MO. The Class E airspace, 700 feet 
and above was enlarged to comply with the criteria specified in FAA 
Order 7400.2D. The Class D and Class E surface area designations were 
revised to reflect a change to the Airport Reference Point. The FAA has 
encountered a delay in publication of an extension of comment period 
and a correction to Docket 98-ACE-6; therefore, it is necessary to 
withdraw the Direct final rule, request for comments.

Conclusion

    In consideration of the aforementioned publication delay, action is 
being taken to withdraw the Direct final rule, request for comments 
until an appropriate comment period is provided.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

    Withdrawal of the Direct final rule, request for comments
    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Airspace 
Docket No. 98-ACE-6, as published in the Federal Register on April 27, 
1998 (63 FR 20528), is hereby withdrawn.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40103, 40113, 40120; E. O. 10854, 24 FR 
9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO, on July 10, 1998.
Christopher R. Blum,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 98-20116 Filed 7-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 148 (Monday, August 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 41238]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20586]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EL98-2-003]


Wisconsin Public Service Corporation; Notice of Filing

July 27, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 20, 1998, Wisconsin Public Service 
Corporation tendered for filing its compliance filing in the above-
referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedures (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before August 7, 1998. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20586 Filed 7-31-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 11-6717.

#### Mark Marvin, Petitioner v. Orange County Department of Social Services.

565 U.S. 1082, 132 S. Ct. 837,

181 L. Ed. 2d 532,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8810.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.

Same case below, 16 N.Y.3d 849, 947 N.E.2d 156.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Entech Environmental Technologies, Inc.,
a Florida corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Burr Northrop, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






Date: February
      20 , 2008
            By:
            /s/ Burr NorthropBurr
      NorthropPresident
      and Chief
              Executive
      Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

BANK ONE CORPORATION
1 Bank One Plaza
Chicago, Illinois 60670

Re:  Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Act of 1934 for
     the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 as filed on Form 10-Q on
     November 13, 2002

     With respect to the subject quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 of the
Securities Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 as
filed on Form 10-Q on November 13, 2002, we acknowledge our awareness of the use
therein of our report dated November 13, 2002, related to our review of interim
financial information.

     Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act"), such
report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified
by an accountant, or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

     Chicago, Illinois
     November 13, 2002

                                                               /s/ KPMG LLP
                                                           ---------------------
                                                                 KPMG LLP

                                       67
•Use the vendor portal to 

review an RFQ, decide 

whether to bid or not, 

and provide a quote.

•RFQ must be in Open 

Solicitation stage

• Go to the vendor portal

• Locate RFQ list on homepage or on 

RFQs page

• Click RFQ number

• Either:

• Click Submit with no bid if you 

don’t want to bid, or

• Click Respond to RFQ

Respond to 

RFQ/Quote

•Once a quote has 

been awarded, use the 

vendor portal to Accept 

or Reject the award.

Vendor Accepts 

/ Rejects Award • Go to the vendor portal

• Click the Open Awards tab

• Click the AWD number

• Open and review each line item to verify 

that you are still capable of providing 

what you submitted.

• To add more 

than one quote 

response, click 

Add

• On the Add Row 

form, click the 

check box 

• Complete the 

form

QUICK REFERENCE CARD: VENDOR

• Either:

• Click Accept Award, or 

• Click Reject Award

•Use the vendor portal to 

register for an account.

Vendor Registration 

• Go to 

https://dla.servicenow

services.mil/vendor

• Click Register

• Complete Vendor 

Registration form

• Click Sign Up

• Click pencil to edit

• Complete form for 

each line item

• Click Submit to create 

quote
No. 11-5983.

#### James Belcher, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 981, 132 S. Ct. 543,

181 L. Ed. 2d 355,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7888.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 427 Fed. Appx. 692.
# Contents

# IL-City of Chicago

# IL-Rest of State

# NY-City of New York

# NY-Rest of State

# PA-Philadelphia County

# PA-Rest of State

# TX-Bexar County

# TX-City of Houston

# TX-El Paso County

# TX-Hidalgo County

# TX-Rest of State

# Guam

# Puerto Rico

# U.S. Virgin Islands

# Data Notes
No. 11-7422.

#### Sidney McCray, Petitioner v. David Rednour, Warden.

565 U.S. 1131, 132 S. Ct. 1049,

181 L. Ed. 2d 770,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 72.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 441 Fed. Appx. 376.
No. 11-7380.

#### X. D., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1129, 132 S. Ct. 1045,

181 L. Ed. 2d 768,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 100.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 442 Fed. Appx. 832.
SCWC-17-0000807 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI  I
HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF NOMURA HOME EQUITY LOAN, IN ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-FM-2,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. MARK MARCANTONIO, and GWEN MARCANTONIO, Petitioners/Defendants/Cross-Claim Defendants-Appellants, and ALINA NAULT, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant,

and MC&A, INC., Respondent/Defendant/Cross-Claim Plaintiff-Appellee, and STATE OF HAWAI  I, HAWAI  I HEALTH SYSTEMS CORPORATION, dba MAUI MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, and DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, STATE OF HAWAI  I, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-17-0000807; CIV. NO. 13-1-0718(3)) Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-17-0000807 09-JUL-2019 08:52 AMORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon further consideration of the records and files in this case, it appearing that the application for writ of certiorari herein was improvidently granted,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this certiorari proceeding is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, July 9, 2019. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on January 21, 2009, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”) Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, GCSD Division of Harris Corporation, Melbourne, FL; and California Instruments, San Diego, CA have withdrawn as parties to this venture.                

                    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, Inc. intends to file                           ( print page 8812)                        additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.                

                    On May 29, 2001, Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 30, 2001 (66 FR 39336).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 3, 2008. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on December 12, 2008 (73 FR 75771).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. E9-4030 Filed 2-25-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
## THE ATJXBECNEY GENERAL OPTEXAS

February 1, 1967

Honorable John C. Mullen OpinionNo. M-19 County Attorney Jim Wells County Re: Whether a personwho has been Alice, Texas convicted of a felony,wherein the sentencewas suspended, and the judgment of convictionhas not been set aside and the cause dismissedunder the provisions of Article 780 of the old Code of Criminal Procedure, is barred from applying for and receivingprobationunder the Misdemeanor Probation Law. Dear Mr. Mullen: Article 42.13,V.C.C.P.

You have requested this office for an opinion on the hereinabove set out question.

Article 42.13,Vernon's Code of Criminal Procedure, known as the Misdemeanor Probation Law, provides, among other conditions, in Section 3(a)(2) thereof, that a defendantwho has been found guilty of a misdemeanor wherein themaximum oermissiblepunishment isby confinement in jail or by a fine in excess of $200,may be 'granted probation if: "He has never before been convicted in this or another jurisdiction of a felony or of a misdemeanor for which the maximum permissiblepunishment is by confinement in jail or exceeds a $200 fine."

It has been held that the expression "convictionof a felony", as used in the suspended sentence law,means that status resulting from a judgmentbased on a verdict finding the accused guilty, and hence includes a convictionwhere sentencehas been suspended. Hill v. State, 243 S.W. 982 fTex.Crim.1922); Bradshaw v. State, 81 S g.2d 83 (Tex.Crim. State, llo s w 26 711 (Tex.Crim. 1938). eS.W.2d l&'(Te~,f.?;~m. 1933); Thompion -m'?A R¶Q /WC..,

Ir,im i935); Edwards Whitlock v. Sta, **V.** State, 244 L?'

.W.LU "J.7.

(IT*."AYu.d.2>=,. Therefore, in view of the above authoritiesand under the facts stated, it is the opinion of this office that a person who has been convicted of a felonywherein the sentence was suspended is barred thereby from applying for and

-76-Honorable John C. Mullen, Page 2 (M-19)

receivin probation under the Misdemeanor Probation Law. Article $2.13,V.C.C.P. SUMMARY

A person who has been convicted of a felony,wherein the sentencewas suspended, and the judgment of conviction has not been set aside and the cause dismissedunder the provisions of Article 780 of the old Code of Criminal Procedure, is barred from applying for and receivingprobation under the Misdemeanor Probation Law. Article 42.13, V.C.C.P. Y*s very truly,

WAt rney General of Texas RLL/dt Preparedby R. L. Lattimore Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE: Hawthorne Phillips, Chairman W. V. Geppert, Co-chairman Sam Kelley John Banks Bill Craig David Longoria A. J. Carubbi, Jr. Staff LegalAssistant

-77-
No. 85-1617.

#### Emerson Electric Co. *v.*Swenson et al.

Sup. Ct. Minn. Motion of Chamber of Commerce of the United States et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae*granted. Motion of petitioner to defer consideration of the petition for writ of certiorari denied. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-5942.

#### Akeem Muhammad, Petitioner v. George Sapp, et al.

565 U.S. 1108, 132 S. Ct. 1073,

181 L. Ed. 2d 730,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 155.

January 9, 2012.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Roger Dean, Chief Financial Officer of CURO Group Holdings Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to Section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) the annual report on Form 10-K/A of the Company to which this Exhibit is attached (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








_ /s/ Roger Dean ______________


Roger Dean


Chief Financial Officer


March 26, 2018
(1) Adjusting Price $27.55 CWT

(2) Base Price $26.48 CWT

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $1.07

(4) Price change per gallon $0.09

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.05

Price change per quart $0.02 

Price change per pint $0.01

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price change per half pint $0.01

(6) Price adjustment per gallon $0.09

Price adjustment per half gallon $0.05

Price adjustment per quart $0.02

Price adjustment per pint $0.01

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price adjustment per half pint $0.01

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positive or increases.

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032 Alt. I)

Based on California Marketing Area Federal Milk Order #51

 Effective Date: May 1st, 2022
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

** **

Reference is herebymade to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 9, 2017,by and among MORGAN STANLEY CAPITAL I INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer, AEGON USA REALTY ADVISORS, LLC,as SpecialServicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator and Custodian, withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2017-CC (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section10.8 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.      Areview of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance perthe Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2.      To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all ofits obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

Leslie Hayton 

Managing Director

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
No. 11M44.

#### Travis Loren Dally, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1032, 132 S. Ct. 603,

181 L. Ed. 2d 419,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8174.

November 14, 2011.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION Ill 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 

The Honorable Randy C. Huffman, Secretary 

Executive Office 

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection 

601 57th Street, SE 

Charleston, West Virginia 25304 

Dear Secretary Huffman: 

JUL 1 9 2012 

On June 12, 2012, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision 

to the West Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the West Virginia Department of 

Environmental Protection (WVDEP). The SIP revision pertains to amendments to West 

Virginia's Legislative Rule 45CSR8 -Ambient Air Quality Standards. Revisions to the rule 

provide for a change in the effective date for the incorporation by reference of the National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards for sulfur oxides, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, ozone, 

nitrogen dioxide, and lead as promulgated by EPA. EPA has determined that the submittal is 

administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a notice of proposed 

rulemaking. 

If members of your staffhave any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Asrah Khadr, 

at (215) 814-2071. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking. 

cc: John A. Benedict, Director 

Division of Air Quality, WVDEP 

Sincerely, 

~~&/ Air Protection Division 

'..~'rinted ~· on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free. 

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474