alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
************************

• MONOGRAPH NO.: 3B2

************************

ITEM: CAKE, CHOCOLATE WITH VANILLA CRUMB TOPPING- TYPE 2 THERMOHYDROSTABLIZED,

TRAY PACK (CCV)

NSN: 8920 01 389 2270 ITEM SPECIFICATION: MIL C 44326

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Dense chocolate cake with distinct vanilla crumb topping.

Color profile: Medium to moderate chocolate brown cake with tan color topping.

Light to moderate brown bottom and side surfaces.

ODOR: Sweet chocolate cake with sweet vanilla topping.

FLAVOR: Sweet chocolate cake with sweet vanilla topping.

TEXTURE: Dense, moist to slightly dry cake. Crumbly topping.

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT 80 DEGREES F: 36 months

 100 DEGREES F: 6 months

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

Appearance: Product may darken (both cake and topping).

Odor: Slightly stale or slightly rancid. Slight loss of sweet chocolate

cake and/or vanilla topping.

Flavor: Slightly stale or slightly rancid. Slight loss of sweet

chocolate cake and/or vanilla topping.

Texture: May become moderately dry.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: Can is designed to yield 18 portions cut 3

rows by 6 rows each.
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3896 STANDARD 27.61 -1.21 7.53

Tolerance

1 3896A VIOLET LIMIT 27.45 -1.04 7.39 -0.16 0.17 -0.14 0.26

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

Shade Number GREEN 2243 Piece/Roll Number 3896

DLA/MARINE CORP SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT July 20, 2017

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, SERGE, POLYESTER/WOOL, 

USMC MATERNITY TUNIC MIL-C-29374
No. 11-7779.

#### Eric Scott, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1169, 132 S. Ct. 1122,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1001,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 657.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 440 Fed. Appx. 772.
Letter extending Management Agreement with SandRidge Capital LP



 Exhibit 10.7(b) 
 June 1, 2011 
 SandRidge Capital, L.P. 

1300 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 325 
 Houston,
Texas 77056 
 Attention: Mr. Andrew M. Rowe 
 Re: Management Agreement Renewals 
 Dear Mr. Rowe: 

We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management
Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2012 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 Bristol Energy Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 CMF SandRidge Master Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Tactical Diversified Futures fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1290. 
 Very truly yours, 
 CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Jennifer Magro

		 	Jennifer Magro
		 	Chief Financial Officer and Director

  

			
	SANDRIDGE CAPITAL, L.P.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Andrew M. Rowe

	Print Name:	 	Andrew M. Rowe
	JM/sr
| (logo) **ncb**  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011 Crystal  Drive  Suite, 8oo  Arlington, VA 22202 |
|---------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**FORM OF ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

 

CERTIFICATION

 

BANK 2017-BNK7, Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2017-BNK7 (the “Trust”)

 

I,Karyn Mann, on behalf of National Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB MasterServicer (the “Certifying Servicer”), certify toWells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc. and its officers, directors and affiliates, and withthe knowledge and intent that they will rely upon this certification, that:

 

1.      I (orServicing Officers under my supervision) have reviewed the CertifyingServicer’s activities during the preceding calendar year between January 1,2018 and December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”)and the CertifyingServicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

 

2.      To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement inall material respects during the Reporting Period.  

 

 

Date:February 6, 2019

 

 

NATIONALCOOPERATIVE BANK, N.A.,

asNCB Master Servicer

By:/s/ Karyn Mann

Name:Karyn Mann

Title:Senior Vice President
Annual Compliance Statement

Reference is made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2017, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, KeyBank National Association, as Master Servicer, Green Loan Services LLC (“Special Servicer”) as successor to KeyBank National Association, as Special Servicer, Computershare Trust Company, NA as agent for Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Trustee, Paying Agent and Custodian as the same may have heretofore been and/or may hereafter be assigned, modified, amended and/or restated (the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.07 of the Agreement, Andrew Falk, Senior Vice President of Green Loan does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of Special Servicer during the period from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 (the “ Reporting Period ”) and of its performance under the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision; and




2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 1st day of March 2023.

/s/ Andrew Falk

Andrew Falk

Senior Vice President

---
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Jose Juan Juarez , Appellant

No. 06

- 21

- 00081

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 402nd District Court of

Wood County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. 240,070

- 2019 ). Memorandum O pinion delivered by Justice Burgess

, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Stevens participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Jose Juan Juarez , has adequately indicated his inability to pay

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED S EPTEMBER 16, 2021

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

W. Harris Government Services Contractor, Inc. )

) ASBCA No. 63095

Under Contract No. HDEC08

- 12

- C

- 0014 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Thomas R. Krider, Esq.

Jedidiah K. Blake, Esq.

Oles Morrison Rinker & Baker LLP

Seattle, WA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Brian M. Lucero, Esq.

Deputy General Counsel

Michael R. Sandberg, Esq.

Betsy E. Dulin, Esq.

Trial Attorneys

Defense Commissary Agency

Fort Lee, VA

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: January 19 , 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63095

, Appeal of W. Harris

Government Services Contractor, Inc. , rendered in conformance with the Board’s

Charter.

Dated: January 19, 2022 JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeal s

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
exh10-6.htm










Exhibit 10.6


Amended Exclusive Cooperation Agreement







This Amended Exclusive Cooperation Agreement (this  “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of March 28, 2012 (the “effective date”) between Mr. Tang Weijiao and Ms. Cao Xiaoya, both residents of West Wenshan Road, Suite 117, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China ( “Party C”) an Hangzhou Kunjiang Education Technology Co., Ltd., a wholly foreign owned company (“Party A”) and  Peng Tuo Information Technology Co., Ltd., a private   education company duly established and existing under the law of China (“Party B or “PTIT”), Party A, B and C also referred to herein together as the “parties” and individually as a “Party.”







NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the execution and delivery of the Agreement and other good an valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:







The original Exclusive Cooperation Agreement dated December 30, 2011shall become effective on the date when Peng Tuo Education and Technology Co., Ltd. (“PTIT”) provides China Education International, Inc. (“CEII”) PTIT’s audited financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 and unaudited financial statements for any completed three month period as of the date such financials are provided to CEII, all of which shall be prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied (“USGAAP”). The parties further agree that the PTIT financial statements will be provided to CEII no later than June 15, 2012 and that such financial statements shall be reasonably acceptable to CEII.







This Amendment shall be deemed part of, but shall take precedence over and supersede any provisions to the contrary contained in the original Exclusive Cooperation Agreement.







.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the dated first written above.







PARTY A:


Hangzhou Kunjiang Education Technology Co., Ltd.







/s/Gary Gan


by: Gary Gan, Chief Executive Officer


 

 


Party B


Peng Tuo Information Technology Co., Ltd.







/s/Tang Weijiao


by: Tang Weijiao, its CEO




Party C







/s/Tang Weijiao


Name: Tang Weijiao







/s/Cao Xiaoya


Name: Cao Xiaoya
#### Samuel CONCA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NACIREMA OPERATING COMPANY, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 14641.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued March 5, 1964.

Decided March 18, 1964.

Jacob Rassner, New York City (Samuel M. Cole, Jersey City, N. J., on the brief), for appellant.

William L. Dill, Jr., Newark, N. J. (Stryker, Tams & Dill, Newark, N. J., *318James T. Clare, Newark, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.

Before McLAUGHLIN and FORMAN, Circuit Judges, and LEAHY, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

 In this common law negligence personal injury case, the trial court sustained the defense motion to dismiss the action on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to present any evidence from which negligence of the defendant might be reasonably inferred to have been a proximate cause of plaintiff’s injuries. As the district judge found, plaintiff’s attorney conceded that no affirmative evidence had been presented to support such an inference. Appellant relies solely on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. He refers to a number of decisions in this circuit which, inter alia, categorically hold as a sine qua non that the instrumentality must be exclusively controlled by the defendant. That is also the law of New Jersey where the accident happened. Grugan v. Shore Hotels, etc. Corp., 126 N.J.L. 257, 18 A.2d 29 (E & A 1941); Oelschlaeger v. Hahne & Co., 2 N.J. 490, 66 A.2d 861 (1949); Bornstein v. Metropolitan Bottling Co., 26 N.J. 263, 139 A.2d 404 (1958). The district court justifiably found under the evidence that:

> “At the time of the accident there were not any Nacirema employees working in the area. The skid had been in the position from which it fell for at least a day or two before the accident. Its fall must have been caused by someone moving it or striking it or moving something against which it rested and that could not have been a Nacirema employee. The occurrence, therefore, does not bespeak negligence of Naci-rema as its most likely cause. Further, the evidence was that although the skid, owned by American President Lines, was provided for the use of the defendant, Nacirema, during certain ship loading and unloading operations, it was sometimes moved from one location to another on the pier by persons other than Nacirema employees. There was a constant movement of vehicles, trucks, cranes, and high-lows on the pier operated by persons other than Nacirema employees. The skid, or at least the location of it on the American President Lines Pier, was not within such exclusive control of the defendant that it can be said that the fall of the skid and the injury caused thereby brings into operation the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.”

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
3 d,- 2 

B 

A 

0.RAW'ING PAGE 1 IS A NON-OIT Al.£0 SKIT CH OR 

PHOTOTIIAT lSUS£0AlONGWJTH PAG£S2AA03 

PRODUCT OATASIICCTS,APPOIDIXA.RMSJON OTO 

BC usm TOCOMPAA.£SI-ID.T£fl. SYSTD.CSAAO 

SUPPORT COMPONGITS f.'OR PROCURD.IOIT BY US 

MJUTARYUS£RS. THEOOCUMENTSWILLBEPOST£0 

f."OR R£Vl�V ON Ttl E 01.AM IL W£BSJTE. 

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT: 

DISTRIBUTION FOR THIS DOCUMENT, 

SPECIFICATION AND GRAPHIC ARE 

AUTHORIZED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. 

4 I

3 � ITAR CATAGORY N/A 2 NON-SENSITIVE 

I 

MANUFACTURER 

TITLE

PART NUMBER 

APPROVED BY 

SIZE NIA SCALE NIA 

1 

B 

CAGE CODE 

A 

DATE 

WEIGHT NIA PAGE 1 O 2

Accessory, Tent,
APPENDIX A 

Revision D

Company . Cage Code

Manfacturing Source Company

Part Number / NSN 

ACCESSORY, TENT PRODUCT DATA SHEET 

Specifications as applicable

Insulated Liner

Insulated Flooring

Solar Shade/ Camouflage Netting

Weight (Unpackaged) (lb.)

Color in accordance with FED-STD595

Special/Additional Features:
No. 11-6488.

#### Christopher Jones, Petitioner v. Boyd Bennett, et al.

565 U.S. 1065, 132 S. Ct. 768,

181 L. Ed. 2d 494,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8606.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 435 Fed. Appx. 236.
amend5secured.htm




EXHIBIT 4.2


AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO


GREEN BALLAST, INC.


8% SENIOR SECURED NOTE


 

 


THIS AMENDMENT NO. 5, dated as of March 31, 2012 (the “Amendment”), to the 8% Senior Secured Note, dated as of April 15, 2011, as amended from time to time (the “GBL Note”), by Green Ballast, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company issued the GBL Note to Green Ballast LLC, a Tennessee limited liability company (the “Holder”) on April 15, 2011; and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder desire to enter into this Amendment.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged and agreed, the Company and the Holder agree as follows:


 


1.  Section 6(a)(vi) of the GBL Note is hereby amended by deleting Section 6(a)(vi) in its entirety and replacing it with the following:


 


vi.           if at any time after May 1, 2012, the Common Stock shall not be eligible for listing or quotation for trading on a Trading Market and shall not be eligible to resume listing or quotation for trading thereon within five (5) Trading Days, or the Company fails to use its best efforts to cause the Common Stock to be listed or quoted on a Trading Market after May 1, 2012; provided however, that in the event the Company (i) files an S-1 to register for resale the Holder’s Common Stock (including the Conversion Shares issuable upon conversion thereof) and (ii) reasonably diligently responds to comments from the Commission or otherwise uses its best efforts to seek effectiveness of the S-1, the Company shall not be deemed to be in default or breach of this Note if the Commission fails to declare the S-1 effective by February 1, 2012, thereby causing to delay or prevent the Common Stock from becoming eligible for listing or quotation for trading on a Trading Market;


 


2. Except to the extent amended hereby, the GBL Note shall remain in full force and effect.


 


3. All capitalized terms used herein, and not otherwise defined herein, have the respective meanings given to such terms in the GBL Note.


 


4. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original document.  Electronic signatures, whether by fax, e-mail, or other electronic means, shall be treated as original signatures.


 







 


[Signature page to follow.]


 






 


  





  











  








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed the day and year first set forth above.


 


 


 



 



	 	COMPANY:
	 	 
	 	GREEN BALLAST, INC.





 


 



	 	By:  	/s/ Kevin Adams  






	 	Name:	Kevin Adams
	 	Title: 	Chief Executive Officer







 


 


 



 



	 	COMPANY:
	 	 
	 	GREEN BALLAST, LLC





 


 



	 	By:  	/s/ Kevin Adams  






	 	Name:	Kevin Adams
	 	Title: 	Chief Executive Officer
Converted by EDGARwiz








FIRST AMENDMENT TO OPTION AND MINING LEASE




On March 15, 2011, THE COWLES TRUST (as to an undivided 5/8ths interest), VIRGINIA VIERRA (as to an undivided 1/8th interest), DOROTHY FARNANDEZ (as to an undivided 1/8th interest), and EDWARD COMER (as to an undivided 1/8th interest) (collectively referred to as “Owners”) entered into an “Option and Mining Lease” (the “Agreement”) with MAGELLAN GOLD CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation (“Magellan”).




The parties wish to amend the Agreement as follows:




1.

Extension of Option.  A new Paragraph 1(c) shall be added to the Agreement, as follows:




1(c).  Upon payment of an additional TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000.00) by Magellan to Owners, the option period of Paragraph 1 shall be extended from March 15 to 11:59 p.m. on June 15, 2012.  On or before June 15, 2012 Magellan shall give notice to Owner that it will (1) exercise the option to enter into the Mining Lease or (2) terminate the Agreement without further obligation to Owner.




2.

Lease Payments.  Paragraph 2(a) of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:




2(a).  Upon Magellan’s exercise of its option to enter into the Mining Lease, which shall occur not later than June 15, 2012, Magellan shall pay the sum of TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($25,000.00) to Owners.




3.

Work Obligation.  Paragraph 5 of the Agreement is amended to allow Magellan an extension of time until June 15, 2012 to complete its second-phase work commitment of $25,000.00.  (That is, the $25,000.00 expenditure to be completed by March 15, 2012 may now be completed by June 15, 2012.)




4.

Continuing Effect.  All other provisions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect, except as modified by this First Amendment.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this FIRST AMENDMENT TO OPTION AND MINING LEASE the day and year first above written.















1















THE COWLES TRUST







          By: _/s/ Robert Cowles___

      ROBERT COWLES, Trustee

                                                                  




__/s/ Virginia Vierra

___

VIRGINIA VIERRA







_/s/ Dorothy Farnandez

DOROTHY FARNANDEZ







__/S/EDWARD COMER____

EDWARD COMER







MAGELLAN GOLD CORPORATION, a

    Nevada corporation




By: ___/S/ JOHN POWER______

      JOHN POWER, President













Magellan Gold Corporation (7957)

First Amendment to Option and Mining Lease






2
No. 11-7480.

#### Richard DeBlois, Petitioner v. Gregg L. Hershberger, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 1180, 132 S. Ct. 1146,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1021,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 986.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 434 Fed. Appx. 186.
No. 11-630.

#### T. A., Petitioner v. Forest Grove School District.

565 U.S. 1185, 132 S. Ct. 1145,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1033.

181 L. Ed. 2d 1031,

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 638 F.3d 1234.
Exhibit 31.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer


of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)





I, David B. Golub, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:





1) I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Golub Capital BDC 3, Inc.;





2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:





a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.











Date: December 7, 2018








/s/ David B. Golub


David B. Golub


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)