29108 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 98 / Wednesday, May 21, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

as described under Title II of the 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 

(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). 

This action does not involve any 

technical standards that would require 

Agency consideration of voluntary 

consensus standards pursuant to section 

12(d) of the National Technology 

Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 

(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). 

VII. Congressional Review Act 

Pursuant to the Congressional Review 

Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will 

submit a report containing this rule and 

other required information to the U.S. 

Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. This action is not a ‘‘major 

rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides 

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: May 9, 2014. 

Jack Housenger, 

Director, Office of Pesticide Programs. 

Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is 

amended as follows: 

PART 180—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 180 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 

■ 2. Section 180.677 is added to subpart 

C to read as follows: 

§ 180.677 Cyflumetofen; tolerances for 

residues. 

(a) General. Tolerances are 

established for residues of the 

insecticide cyflumetofen, including its 

metabolites and degradates, in or on the 

commodities in the table below. 

Compliance with the tolerance levels for 

cyflumetofen is to be determined by 

measuring only cyflumetofen, 2- 

methoxyethyl a-cyano-a-[4-(1,1- 

dimethylethyl)phenyl]-b-oxo-2- 

(trifluoromethyl)benzenepropanoate, in 

or on the commodity. 

Commodity Parts per 

million 

Almond, hulls ............................ 4.0 

Citrus, oil ................................... 16 

Fruit, citrus, group 10–10 ......... 0.30 

Fruit, pome, group 11–10 ......... 0.30 

Grape ........................................ 0.60 

Nut, tree, group 14–12 ............. 0.01 

Strawberry ................................ 0.60 

Commodity Parts per 

million 

Tomato ...................................... 0.40 

(b) Section 18 emergency exemptions. 

[Reserved] 

(c) Tolerances with regional 

registrations. [Reserved] 

(d) Indirect or inadvertent residues. 

[Reserved] 

[FR Doc. 2014–11496 Filed 5–20–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 300 

[EPA–HQ–SFUND–1989–0008; FRL–9911– 

19–Region 1] 

National Oil and Hazardous 

Substances Pollution Contingency 

Plan; National Priorities List: Deletion 

of the Town Garage/Radio Beacon 

Superfund Site 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) Region 1 is publishing a 

direct final Notice of Deletion of the 

Town Garage/Radio Beacon, Superfund 

(Site), located in Londonderry, New 

Hampshire from the National Priorities 

List (NPL). The NPL, promulgated 

pursuant to section 105 of the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is 

an appendix of the National Oil and 

Hazardous Substances Pollution 

Contingency Plan (NCP). This direct 

final deletion is being published by EPA 

with the concurrence of the State of 

New Hampshire, through the New 

Hampshire Department of 

Environmental Services (NHDES), 

because EPA has determined that all 

appropriate response actions under 

CERCLA, have been completed. 

However, this deletion does not 

preclude future actions under 

Superfund. 

DATES: This direct final deletion is 

effective July 21, 2014 unless EPA 

receives adverse comments by June 20, 

2014. If adverse comments are received, 

EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of 

the direct final deletion in the Federal 

Register informing the public that the 

deletion will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID no. EPA–HQ– 

SFUND–1989–0008, by one of the 

following methods: 

• http://www.regulations.gov. Follow 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: lovely.william@epa.gov or 

elliott.rodney@epa.gov. 

• Fax: 617–918–0240 or 617–918– 

0372. 

• Mail: William Lovely, EPA Region 

1—New England, 5 Post Office Square, 

Suite 100, Mail Code OSRR07–4, 

Boston, MA 02109–3912 or Rodney 

Elliott, EPA Region 1—New England, 5 

Post Office Square, Suite 100, Mail Code 

ORA01–1, Boston, MA 02109–3912. 

• Hand delivery: William Lovely, 

EPA Region 1—New England, 5 Post 

Office Square, Suite 100, Mail Code 

OSRR07–4, Boston, MA 02109–3912 or 

Rodney Elliott, EPA Region 1—New 

England, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 

100, Mail Code ORA01–1, Boston, MA 

02109–3912. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Docket’s normal 

hours of operation (9:00 a.m. to 5:00 

p.m.), and special arrangements should 

be made for deliveries of boxed 

information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1989– 

0008. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http://

www.regulations.gov or email. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an email comment directly 

to EPA without going through http://

www.regulations.gov, your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 98 / Wednesday, May 21, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 29109 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the http://

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

will be publicly available only in the 

hard copy. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in http://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at: 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Records Center, 5 Post Office Square, 

Suite 100, Boston, MA 02109, 617–918– 

1440, Monday–Friday: 9:00 a.m.–5:00 

p.m., Saturday and Sunday–Closed, and 

Leach Library, 276 Mammoth Road, 

Londonderry, NH 03055, 603–432–1132, 

Monday–Thursday: 9:00 a.m.–8:00 p.m., 

Thursday: 10:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m., Friday: 

10:00 a.m.–2:00 p.m., Saturday: 9:00 

a.m.–5:00 p.m., Sunday: Closed. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

William Lovely, Remedial Project 

Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 1 New England, 5 Post 

Office Square, Mail code OSRR07–4, 

Boston, MA 02109–3912, (617) 918– 

1240, email: lovely.william@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. NPL Deletion Criteria 

III. Deletion Procedures 

IV. Basis for Site Deletion 

V. Deletion Action 

I. Introduction 

EPA Region 1 is publishing this direct 

final Notice of Deletion of the Town 

Garage/Radio Beacon Superfund (Site), 

from the National Priorities List (NPL). 

The NPL constitutes Appendix B of 40 

CFR part 300, which is the National Oil 

and Hazardous Substances Pollution 

Contingency Plan (NCP), which EPA 

promulgated pursuant to section 105 of 

the Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation and Liability 

Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended. 

EPA maintains the NPL as the list of 

sites that appear to present a significant 

risk to public health, welfare, or the 

environment. Sites on the NPL may be 

the subject of remedial actions financed 

by the Hazardous Substance Superfund 

(Fund). As described in 300.425(e)(3) of 

the NCP, sites deleted from the NPL 

remain eligible for Fund-financed 

remedial actions if future conditions 

warrant such actions. 

Because EPA considers this action to 

be noncontroversial and routine, this 

action will be effective July 21, 2014 

unless EPA receives adverse comments 

by June 20, 2014. Along with this direct 

final Notice of Deletion, EPA is copublishing a Notice of Intent to Delete 

in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of the 

Federal Register. If adverse comments 

are received within the 30-day public 

comment period on this deletion action, 

EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of 

this direct final Notice of Deletion 

before the effective date of the deletion, 

and the deletion will not take effect. 

EPA will, as appropriate, prepare a 

response to comments and continue 

with the deletion process on the basis of 

the Notice of Intent to Delete and the 

comments already received. There will 

be no additional opportunity to 

comment. 

Section II of this document explains 

the criteria for deleting sites from the 

NPL. Section III discusses procedures 

that EPA is using for this action. Section 

IV discusses the Town Garage/Radio 

Beacon Superfund Site and 

demonstrates how it meets the deletion 

criteria. Section V discusses EPA’s 

action to delete the Site from the NPL 

unless adverse comments are received 

during the public comment period. 

II. NPL Deletion Criteria 

The NCP establishes the criteria that 

EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. 

In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e), 

sites may be deleted from the NPL 

where no further response is 

appropriate. In making such a 

determination pursuant to 40 CFR 

300.425(e), EPA will consider, in 

consultation with the state, whether any 

of the following criteria have been met: 

i. Responsible parties or other persons 

have implemented all appropriate 

response actions required; 

ii. all appropriate Fund-financed 

response under CERCLA has been 

implemented, and no further response 

action by responsible parties is 

appropriate; or 

iii. the remedial investigation has 

shown that the release poses no 

significant threat to public health or the 

environment and, therefore, the taking 

of remedial measures is not appropriate. 

Pursuant to CERCLA section 121(c) 

and the NCP, EPA conducts five-year 

reviews to ensure the continued 

protectiveness of remedial actions 

where hazardous substances, pollutants, 

or contaminants remain at a site above 

levels that allow for unlimited use and 

unrestricted exposure. EPA conducts 

such five-year reviews even if a site is 

deleted from the NPL. EPA may initiate 

further action to ensure continued 

protectiveness at a deleted site if new 

information becomes available that 

indicates it is appropriate. Whenever 

there is a significant release from a site 

deleted from the NPL, the deleted site 

may be restored to the NPL without 

application of the hazard ranking 

system. 

III. Deletion Procedures 

The following procedures apply to 

deletion of the Site: 

(1) EPA consulted with the state of 

New Hampshire prior to developing this 

direct final Notice of Deletion and the 

Notice of Intent to Delete co-published 

today in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section 

of the Federal Register. 

(2) EPA has provided the state 30 

working days for review of this notice 

and the parallel Notice of Intent to 

Delete prior to their publication today, 

and the state, through the New 

Hampshire Department of 

Environmental Services (NHDES), has 

concurred on the deletion of the Site 

from the NPL. 

(3) Concurrently with the publication 

of this direct final Notice of Deletion, a 

notice of the availability of the parallel 

Notice of Intent to Delete is being 

published in a major local newspaper, 

the Union Leader. The newspaper 

notice announces the 30-day public 

comment period concerning the Notice 

of Intent to Delete the Site from the 

NPL. 

(4) The EPA placed copies of 

documents supporting the proposed 

deletion in the deletion docket and 

made these items available for public 

inspection and copying at the Site 

information repositories identified 

above. 

(5) If adverse comments are received 

within the 30-day public comment 

period on this deletion action, EPA will 

publish a timely notice of withdrawal of 

this direct final Notice of Deletion 

before its effective date and will prepare 

a response to comments and continue 

with the deletion process on the basis of 

the Notice of Intent to Delete and the 

comments already received. 

Deletion of a site from the NPL does 

not itself create, alter, or revoke any 

individual’s rights or obligations. 

Deletion of a site from the NPL does not 

in any way alter EPA’s right to take 

enforcement actions, as appropriate. 

The NPL is designed primarily for 

informational purposes and to assist 

EPA management. Section 300.425(e)(3) 

of the NCP states that the deletion of a 

site from the NPL does not preclude 

eligibility for future response actions, 

should future conditions warrant such 

actions. 

IV. Basis for Site Deletion 

The following information provides 

EPA’s rationale for deleting the Site 

from the NPL: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
29110 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 98 / Wednesday, May 21, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

Site Background and History 

The Town Garage/Radio Beacon 

Superfund Site, CERCLIS ID No. 

NHD981063860, is located north of 

Pillsbury Road near the intersection of 

Pillsbury and High Range Roads in 

Londonderry, New Hampshire. The Site 

encompasses three residential 

developments, a wetland area, and the 

Londonderry Town Garage area located 

on High Range Road. The Site was 

discovered in 1984 following a request 

to the State by residents of the Holton 

Circle subdivision to sample their 

bedrock wells. Sampling results from 

NHDES revealed the presence of volatile 

organic compounds (VOCs) in several of 

the residential drinking water wells and 

the nearby Town Garage well at 

concentrations in excess of state and 

federal drinking water standards. In 

June 1988, the Site was proposed for 

inclusion on the NPL, (49 FR 40320) 

and the Site was made final to the NPL 

on March 31, 1989 (54 FR 13296). 

Remedial Investigation 

The RI/FS was completed in 1992. As 

part of the investigation, surface soil, 

subsurface soil, surface water, 

groundwater, and air were all evaluated 

and compared to appropriate 

benchmarks. Contaminants detected, 

and attributable to the Site, included: 

VOCs, semi-volatile organic compounds 

(SVOCs), and metals. The findings of 

the RI/FS determined that contaminant 

concentrations in groundwater posed an 

unacceptable risk to human health due 

to its current use as a drinking water 

source at that time. However, the risk 

was limited to future exposures because 

the extension of a public water supply 

in 1992/93 to nearby residents 

prevented current exposures to 

groundwater from private wells that 

were found to be impacted with Siterelated contaminants. With respect to 

soil, surface water and sediments, the 

RI/FS determined that contaminant 

concentrations in these media were at 

levels that did not pose an unacceptable 

risk to human health or ecological 

receptors. Further details about the RI/ 

FS are documented in the RI/FS reports, 

which are included as part of the 

administrative index and docket for the 

Site. 

The Selected Remedy 

To address the risks presented by 

future exposure to contaminated 

groundwater, EPA issued a Record of 

Decision (ROD) for the cleanup of the 

Site on September, 30 1992 that 

included the following the following 

remedial action objectives (RAOs): 

• Prevent ingestion of water which 

contains compounds in concentrations 

that exceed federal and state enforceable 

drinking water standards; and 

• Prevent ingestion of water 

containing compounds which have no 

enforceable federal or state drinking 

water standards, but which pose an 

unacceptable health risk. 

In response to the RAO’s, the 1992 

ROD prescribed a remedy that included 

four major components: (1) Restoration 

of contaminated groundwater in the 

overburden and bedrock aquifers by 

natural attenuation, (2) institutional 

controls, (3) groundwater monitoring, 

and (4) an alternative water supply 

contingency. The goal of the remedy 

was to prevent future exposures to Siterelated groundwater contaminants while 

natural attenuation processes gradually 

reduced contaminant concentrations to 

levels below state and federal standards. 

Response Actions 

Consistent with the 1992 ROD, 

groundwater monitoring was performed 

to track the progress of the aquifer 

restoration via natural attenuation and 

help prevent future exposures to Siterelated groundwater contaminants. 

Institutional controls, in the form of a 

Groundwater Management Permit 

(GMP) that was issued by NHDES 

notified property owners of the 

groundwater contamination thereby 

helping to prevent future exposures to 

Site-related contaminants within the 

plume area. With respect to the 

contingency for an alternative water 

supply, this remedial component was 

not implemented because concurrently 

with the issuance of the ROD, the Town 

extended its municipal water supply to 

accommodate a new residential 

development near the Site on 

Saddleback Road. At that time, existing 

homes that were also located near the 

Site were connected to the municipal 

water supply as a precautionary 

measure to limit the likelihood of future 

exposures to contaminated 

groundwater. 

From 1994 through 2012 groundwater 

samples were collected every Fall with 

the results showing that contaminant 

concentrations were gradually declining 

over time. After reviewing the 2012 

Annual Summary Report, Groundwater 

Monitoring Program, which showed 

concentrations for all contaminants of 

concern identified in the 1992 ROD 

were below their respective cleanup 

levels, and at or near their lowest 

concentrations since the monitoring 

program began, EPA concluded that 

restoration of the overburden and 

bedrock aquifers by natural attenuation 

was complete and prepared a Final 

Close Out Report (FCOR) dated 

February 2014 to document that all 

Remedial Activities required by the 

1992 ROD have been completed. The 

FCOR is included in the administrative 

record and deletion docket for the Site 

and a copy was also sent to the Leach 

public library. 

Cleanup Levels 

The interim groundwater cleanup 

levels selected by EPA in the 1992 ROD 

were selected based on the more 

stringent of a federal or state Applicable 

or Relevant and Appropriate (ARAR) 

standard, or in the absence of such 

standard, a risk based standard. 

The cleanup levels were set to be 

within EPA’s acceptable risk range of 1 

× 10¥4 to 1 × 10¥6. Once groundwater 

monitoring results constituted the third 

consecutive annual sampling event 

where Site-related contaminant 

concentrations were either at or below 

the interim cleanup levels specified in 

the 1992 ROD, EPA performed a risk 

evaluation of residual groundwater 

contamination, a copy of which is 

included in the Deletion Docket. Based 

on the risk evaluation, as well as the 

technical information reflected in the 

Deletion Docket and Administrative 

Record, EPA has determined that the 

actions taken to address groundwater at 

the Site are protective of human health 

for the purposes of the CERCLA 

remediation. Further, based on this 

finding, the interim groundwater 

cleanup levels established in the ROD 

are protective and should be deemed the 

final performance standards for the 

groundwater cleanup. 

Operation and Maintenance 

Operation and maintenance activities 

as part of the remedial action consisted 

of groundwater monitoring in support of 

the natural attenuation remedy and 

administering the GMP, which served as 

the institutional control for the Site. 

However, with the achievement of the 

interim groundwater cleanup levels 

specified in the 1992 ROD, the 

groundwater monitoring program will 

be terminated and the GMP will not be 

renewed as there is no longer a need to 

maintain an institutional control on the 

Site. 

Five-Year Reviews 

Five Year Reviews have been 

competed for the Site in 1999, 2004, and 

2009. Each of these reviews concluded 

that the remedy was protective of 

human health and the environment, but 

also recommended that: The existing 

monitoring program be expanded once 

the cleanup levels have been achieved 

to address additional data needs related 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 98 / Wednesday, May 21, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 29111 

to groundwater discharges to surface 

water; comparisons of groundwater data 

to newer standards, including for 

additional Site-related contaminants of 

concern that were not in effect when the 

1992 ROD was issued; and an 

evaluation for the presence of 1,4- 

dioxane. In August 2010, EPA received 

the 2010 Annual Summary Report, 

Groundwater Monitoring Program, 

which showed that concentrations of all 

Site-related contaminants, were below 

their respective ROD cleanup levels, 

that arsenic and 1,4-dioxane in 

groundwater were below the laboratory 

reporting limits and respective 

maximum contaminant levels and that 

groundwater discharges to surface water 

were not an issue. 

The Fourth Five-Year Review was due 

in March 2014. However, after 

reviewing the monitoring results for 

2011, and 2012, which consistent with 

the 2010 results, were all below their 

respective ROD cleanup levels, EPA 

determined that no further Five-Year 

Reviews are required, because the Site 

has achieved the RAOs specified in the 

1992 ROD. EPA’s decision is 

documented in a memorandum dated 

February 19, 2014, which is included as 

part of the Docket for this notice. 

Community Involvement 

Consistent with the requirements of 

CERCLA and the NCP, EPA released a 

community relations plan in 1990 

which kept the local citizens group and 

other interested parties informed 

through activities such as informational 

meetings, community updates, press 

releases, holding public hearings, and 

addressing public comments associated 

with the 1992 ROD. In addition, EPA 

periodically met with nearby residents 

and Town officials during routine site 

inspections and as part of the Five-Year 

Review process, which occurred in 

1999, 2004, and 2009. EPA maintains a 

site file for the local community at the 

Leach public library located on 276 

Mammoth Road, Londonderry, NH 

03055 and at EPA’s Boston offices. 

Determination That the Site Meets the 

Criteria for Deletion in the NCP 

The implemented remedy achieves 

the degree of cleanup specified in the 

ROD for all pathways of exposure. All 

selected remedial action objectives and 

clean-up levels are consistent with 

agency policy and guidance. No further 

Superfund responses are needed to 

protect human health and the 

environment at the Site. 

The National Contingency Plan (NCP) 

specifies that EPA may delete a site 

from the NPL if ‘‘all appropriate 

responsible parties or other persons 

have implemented all appropriate 

response actions required’’ or ‘‘all 

appropriate fund financed response 

under CERCLA has been implemented 

and no further response action by 

responsible parties is appropriate’’. 

EPA, with the concurrence of the State 

of New Hampshire through NHDES by 

a letter dated February 24, 2014, 

believes these criteria for deletion have 

been satisfied. Therefore, EPA is 

proposing the deletion of the Site from 

the NPL. All of the completion 

requirements for the Site have been met 

as described in the Town Garage/Radio 

Beacon Final Closeout Report (FCOR), 

dated February 2014. 

V. Deletion Action 

The EPA, with concurrence of the 

State of New Hampshire through the 

NHDES, has determined that all 

appropriate response actions under 

CERCLA, have been completed. 

Therefore, EPA is deleting the Site from 

the NPL. 

Because EPA considers this action to 

be noncontroversial and routine, EPA is 

taking it without prior publication. This 

action will be effective July 21, 2014 

unless EPA receives adverse comments 

by June 20, 2014. If adverse comments 

are received within the 30-day public 

comment period, EPA will publish a 

timely withdrawal of this direct final 

notice of deletion before the effective 

date of the deletion, and it will not take 

effect. EPA will prepare a response to 

comments and continue with the 

deletion process on the basis of the 

notice of intent to delete and the 

comments already received. There will 

be no additional opportunity to 

comment. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous 

waste, Hazardous substances, 

Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Superfund, Water 

pollution control, Water supply. 

Dated: April 24, 2014. 

H. Curtis Spalding, 

Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1. 

Therefore, 40 CFR part 300 is 

amended as follows: 

PART 300—NATIONAL OIL AND 

HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES 

POLLUTION CONTINGENCY PLAN 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 300 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 

9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 

1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923; 

3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193. 

Appendix B to Part 300—[Amended] 

■ 2. Table 1 of Appendix B to part 300 

is amended by removing the entry for 

‘‘NH’’, ‘‘Town Garage/Radio Beacon’’, 

‘‘Londonderry’’. 

[FR Doc. 2014–11796 Filed 5–20–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 54 

[WC Docket Nos. 10–90, 05–337; DA 14– 

534] 

Connect America Fund, High-Cost 

Universal Service Support 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the 

Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) 

finalizes decisions regarding the 

engineering assumptions contained in 

the Connect America Cost Model (CAM) 

and adopt inputs necessary for the 

model to calculate the cost of serving 

census blocks in price cap carrier areas. 

The Commission also estimates the final 

budget for the Phase II offer to modelbased support to price cap carriers in 

light of the conclusion of the second 

round of Phase I funding. 

DATES: Effective June 20, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Katie King, Wireline Competition 

Bureau, (202) 418–7491 or TTY: (202) 

418–0484. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of the Bureau’s Report and 

Order in WC Docket No. 10–90, 05–337; 

DA 14–534, adopted on April 22, 2014, 

and released on April 22, 2014. The full 

text of this document is available for 

public inspection during regular 

business hours in the FCC Reference 

Center, Room CY–A257, 445 12th Street 

SW., Washington, DC 20554, or at the 

following Internet address: http://

hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/

attachmatch/DA-14-534A1.pdf 

I. Introduction 

1. The Report and Order takes 

important steps to further implement 

the landmark reforms unanimously 

adopted by the Federal Communications 

Commission (Commission) in 2011 to 

modernize universal service to maintain 

voice service and expand broadband 

availability in areas served by price cap 

carriers, known as Phase II of the 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES