alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2nd Annual

Teal Ribbon

Relay

Call 1-800-841-0937

to reach a DLA

credentialed SARC

for 24/7 confidential

SAPR support

WALK. RUN. ROLL. BIKE. Join the DLA SAPR team in our virtual Sexual Assault Awareness &

Prevention Month (SAAPM) relay to raise awareness, show support, and ensure victims are connected to resources enterprise-wide by

connecting our DLA sites with the goal of reaching 16,203 miles.

Email your miles to your HQ or MSC

Sexual Assault Response Coordinator

(SARC) every Friday throughout the

month of April.

Note: Civilian and Military participation

during duty hours must be pre-approved

by respective supervisors

CENTCOM

EUCOM

INDO-PACIFIC

FT BELVOIR

RICHMOND

PHILADELPHIA

NEW CUMBERLAND COLUMBUS

BATTLE CREEK
Form of Amd. 1 to the Aleris Corp. 2010 Equity Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.14.1 

ALERIS CORPORATION 
 2010 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 Form of 

AMENDMENT 1 TO 
 RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT 
 On June 11, 2011 you were granted restricted stock
units of Aleris Corporation (the “Company”) pursuant to an Award Agreement issued under the Company’s 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). 
 In light of the Company becoming a public company, we have amended, restated and renamed the Plan as the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan and we have mutually agreed to amend the terms of your Award Agreement,
effective immediately prior to the effectiveness of an initial public offering of the Company pursuant to the Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 26, 2011, as amended, (the “IPO”), as follows:

  

	1.	Section 1. Grant of Restricted Stock Units. The last two sentences of Section 1 are deleted. 


 

	2.	Section 9(b). Governmental Regulations and Stop-Transfer Orders. Section 9(b) is amended to delete subsections 9(b)(v), 9(c) and 9(d).


  

	3.	Section 10(b). Tax Reporting. Section 10(b) is amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows: 


(b) For purposes of this Agreement, “Fair Market Value” is defined in the Plan. 

 

	4.	Section 13. Stockholders Agreement. Section 13 is deleted. 


 

	5.	Section 15. Restricted Stock Units Subject to the Plan. Section 15 is amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:


 Restricted Stock Units Subject to the Plan. By entering into this Agreement, the Participant agrees and
acknowledges that (i) the Participant has received and read a copy of the Plan as in effect on the date hereof, and (ii) the Restricted Stock Units are subject to the Plan. In the event of a conflict between any term or provision contained
in this Agreement and any term or provision of the Plan, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall prevail. No amendment to the Plan or this Agreement that is inconsistent with the express terms of this Agreement and that adversely affects
any of the Participant’s rights under this Agreement shall be effective as to this Agreement without the Participant’s prior written consent; provided, however, the Committee may amend the Plan and this Agreement to the extent necessary to
comply with the applicable law. 
  

	6.	Effective date of this Amendment. This Amendment is effective immediately prior to the effectiveness of the IPO. 


 

	7.	Continued Terms of Restricted Stock Units. Except as otherwise amended in this Agreement, your restricted stock units remain subject in all respects to the terms
and conditions of the Award Agreement and the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan and you acknowledge that a copy of the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan has been provided to you. 








 Please indicate your acceptance of this Amendment to the Award Agreement with respect to your restricted
stock units by signing and returning a copy of this Amendment to the address set forth below as soon as practicable. 
  

	
	ALERIS CORPORATION
	
	  
	Christopher R. Clegg
	 Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary

	     

	
	 
	Participant:
	Date:



  
 2
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification

 

I, Rajesh Kalathur, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                      I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                      All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association (as indenture trustee).

 

 
| Date: January 24,   2020 | By:    | */s/ Rajesh Kalathur*                         |
|-------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                          |   | Rajesh Kalathur                               |
|                          |   | President of John Deere   Capital Corporation |
|                          |   | (as Servicer)                                 |

 

----
No. 11-6275.

#### Michael Allen, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

565 U.S. 987, 132 S. Ct. 544,

181 L. Ed. 2d 366,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7861.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Unassociated Document


 



Agreement


 


(English Translation)


 


Party A: Zhuolu Hydraulic and Hydro-Power Engineering Company Limited


 


Party B: Zhuolu Jinxin Mining Company Limited


 


Whereas:


 


As of March 20, 2010, Party B owed Party A equipments and construction fee in a total of RMB 16,000,000(the “Fee”).


 


NOW, THEREFORE, with the consensus reached through negotiation, the parties have entered into this Agreement and agree to abide by it pursuant to the applicable laws, regulations and rules of the PRC (“laws of the PRC”):


 


Item I


 


Party B will pay the total amount of RMB 16,000,000 to Party A in three payments as follows:


 


1. RMB 6,000,000 on or before December 31, 2010.


 


2. RMB 5,000,000 on or before December 31, 2011.


 


3. RMB 5,000,000 on or before December 31, 2012.


 


Item II


 


The Fee bears no interests until any amount of the Fee is overdue according to the payment terms stated in Item I.  Interest will be charged on any overdue amount at the benchmark rate issued by Commercial Bank during the same period when the amount is overdue.


 


Item III


 


Any disputes arising from or in relation to this Agreement shall first be settled by the negotiation of both parties. If the dispute could not be solved by negotiation, each party can file the dispute to any court of competent jurisdiction.


 


Item IV


 


This Agreement shall be executed in two copies, each party holds one.  Each of the copies shall be deemed as the original one and has the same effect upon the signing on the Agreement.


 


Party A: Zhuolu Hydraulic and Hydro-Power Engineering Company Limited


 


Representative:


 


Date:  03/20/2010


 


Party B: Zhuolu Jinxin Mining Co., Ltd.


 


Representative:


 


Date: 3/20/2010
24 September 2013 ***********************

NSN: 8920-01-458-0130 (CLPS) * MONOGRAPH NO: M4E1*

 *************************

Item: Pound cakes, Lemon poppy seed, Trans fat free (Type I, Flavor 6, Style 2)

Document: PCR-C-007, Cakes, Brownies, Muffin Tops and Filled Cakes, Packaged in a Flexible 

Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 310 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Intact, uniform cell (crumb) structure without evidence of excessive heating (materially 

darkened or scorched), and without evidence of compression streaks. May have slightly 

browned edges. Light golden surface and yellow crumb with poppy seeds distributed 

throughout.

Odor: Sweet, mild lemon and poppy seed. 

Flavor: Sweet, mild lemon and poppy seed.

Texture: Dense, firm, tender, moist, fine grain crumb with slightly crunchy poppy seeds.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Excessively moist, sticky surface or excessively dry surface and/or excessively dark 

surface and/or crumb. 

Odor: Rancid, scorched, soapy, musty.

Flavor: Rancid, scorched, soapy, musty.

Texture: Excessively moist or excessively dry and crumbly.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

This product should contain an oxygen scavenger packet. If defects such as oxidized or rancid odors or 

flavors exist, they are likely due to package failure or the absence of an oxygen scavenger.
No. 11-5082.

#### Derek N. Jarvis, Petitioner v. Grady Management, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 1075, 132 S. Ct. 806,

181 L. Ed. 2d 517,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8314.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 889, 132 S. Ct. 266, 181 L. Ed. 2d 156, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5260.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Keith Elliot Wood, * From the 104th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 20161B.

Vs. No. 11-16-00305-CR * December 15, 2016

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., 

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance 

with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATIONS

(Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350)



The undersigned hereby certifies
that, to his knowledge (i) the Form 10-QSB filed by ECB Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the period presented therein.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Arthur H. Keeney III             
|                        |  | Arthur H. Keeney III                 
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                        | 
|Date: November 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Gary M. Adams                    
|                        |  | Gary M. Adams                        
|                        |  | Senior Vice President                
|                        |  | and Chief Financial Officer
# 2012 Codebook

# IISAR 2012
************************

• MONOGRAPH NO.: 1C3

************************

ITEM: CHICKEN BREAST WITH VEGETABLES IN TERIYAKI SAUCE (CVT)

NSN: 8940 01 470 3189 Polymeric Tray ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR C 033

 8940 01 470 3221 Tray Pack Can ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR C 028

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM:

APPEARANCE: Glossy, dark brown moderately thick translucent sauce.

Random sized chunks of chicken. Mushrooms, water chestnuts (tan), meat fines

in sauce with oil specs on surface.

ODOR: Mild teriyaki, soy, sweet, ginger, and cooked chicken.

FLAVOR: Vinegar bite, slight acidic, slight sweet, soy, tangy, moderately

salty and ginger. Mild cooked chicken.

TEXTURE: Dry tender/slightly chewy chunks of chicken, crisp water

chestnuts, soft carrots and mushrooms, mushrooms slightly rubbery, and

moderately thick smooth sauce.

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36 months

 100 DEGREES F: 6 months

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES:

Appearance: Oiling off (separation of sauce) darkening of chicken and

sauce, more fines in sauce

Odor: Loss of teriyaki, sweetness and spice; metallic odor

Flavor: Loss of teriyaki, sweetness, and spice; metallic flavor, rancid.

Texture: Thickening of sauce (or thinning), further breakdown of chicken

chunks toughening and drying of chicken (mealy and stringy) carrots become

mushy.

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES:
# C_2018204EN.01021401.xml

| 13.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/214 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/214

---

P8_TA(2016)0328

Nomination of a Member of the Court of Auditors — Lazaros Stavrou Lazarou

European Parliament decision of 13 September 2016 on the nomination of Lazaros Stavrou Lazarou as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C8-0190/2016 — 2016/0807(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2018/C 204/29)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0190/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0190/2016),

| — | having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0258/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0258/2016),

| A. | whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

| B. | whereas at its meeting of 5 September 2016 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

B.

whereas at its meeting of 5 September 2016 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors;

| 1. | Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Lazaros Stavrou Lazarou as a Member of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Lazaros Stavrou Lazarou as a Member of the Court of Auditors;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.

---
28 September 2007 ************************* 

NSN: 8955-01-484-9676 * MONOGRAPH NO: BB10 

 ************************* 

Item: Drink Mixes, Coffee Flavored, instant, Cappuccino, Regular, French Vanilla (Type V, 

Style A, Flavor 1) 

Document: CID A-A-20336, Drink Mixes, Coffee (Unflavored and Flavored) and PKG&QAP 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 120 Component Classification: Secondary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F 

Item Characteristics

Appearance: 

Dehydrated product: Off-white or dark brown combination. 

Rehydrated product: a medium golden brown color with a layer of milky white froth on 

top. 

Odor: 

Dehydrated product: Characteristic of French Vanilla instant cappuccino. 

Rehydrated product: Strong, sweetened coffee with cream characteristic of French 

Vanilla. 

Flavor: Rehydrated product: A strong sweetened coffee with cream flavor characteristic of 

French Vanilla. 

Texture: 

Dehydrated product: Free flowing and fine grained. Lumps that occur can be broken 

apart with light finger pressure. 

Rehydrated product: smooth, free of discernible lumps, and sediment free. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: 

Dehydrated product: Lumpy or caked, not free flowing. Not uniformly blended. Not off 

white or not a dark brown combination. 

Rehydrated product: May not reconstitute instantly, sedimentation, undissolved 

particles. 

Odor: Off odors, such as, strong non-fat dry milk odor, rancid aroma. 

Flavor: Rehydrated product: Flavor not typical of French Vanilla coffee flavor. Off flavors, 

such as, strong non-fat dry milk flavor, rancid. 

Texture: 

Dehydrated product: Not free flowing. Lumps that occur can not be broken apart with 

light finger pressure. 

Rehydrated product: Not sediment free. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Initial examination should be done in the dry state; final examination and evaluation should be done 

after rehydrating IAW package instructions. After adding water gentle stirring is permitted. 

Special Notes Dry product may contain lumps, which are of no concern provided they break or fall 

apart under light finger pressure.
#### Oscar R. Medlin, *Appellant,*v. W. M. Pepper and E. D. Turner, as Receivers Florida Bank and Trust Company, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision Filed January 13, 1926.

*Fred Cubberly,*for Appellant.

*E. G. Baxter*and *S. L. Scruggs,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, uid briefs and arginent of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, J. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 144 (Tuesday, July 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40267-40268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20066]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-657-000]


Columbia Gulf Transmission Company; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

July 22, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 8, 1998, Columbia Gulf Transmission 
Company (Columbia Gulf), 2603 Augusta, Suite 125, Houston, Texas 77001, 
filed in Docket No. CP98-657-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 
and 157.211 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 157.205, 157.211) 
under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to construct and 
operate 7.1 miles of 16-inch diameter pipeline and appurtenances and a 
new delivery point in St. Charles Parish, Louisiana, under Columbia 
Gulf's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP83-496-000, pursuant 
to Section 7 of the NGA, all as more fully set forth in the request 
that is on file with the Commission and open to Public inspection.
    Columbia Gulf proposes to construct, own and operate the facilities 
in order to make deliveries to Entergy Louisiana Inc. (ELI), a retail 
electric utility company which has requested transportation service 
from Columbia. It is stated that the pipeline facilities will extend 
from Columbia Gulf's existing Paradis lateral to an interconnection 
with Evangeline Gas Pipeline, L.P., where the new delivery point will 
be located. It is asserted that Columbia Gulf will initially deliver up 
to 100,000 Dt equivalent of natural gas per day to ELI on an 
interruptible basis pursuant to its ITS-2 rate schedule, with firm 
service to come later. It is estimated that the cost of the proposed 
facilities will be approximately $5,784,800. It is explained that the 
proposed deliveries will not impact Columbia Gulf's existing peak day 
obligations to its other customers.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the intent notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest if filed 
and not withdrawn

[[Page 40268]]

within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant 
request shall be treated as an application for authorization pursuant 
to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20066 Filed 7-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M