alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### R eg u l ato t -y Eva luation

## ~o!S"**--A/A1-** 

# o**tD -~**  Docket No
. 

### FAA-20 1 3 I 026 Di r ecto r a te**Id ifi** **r: ~** 

((you mak e c hang es t o th e ralue.\ in the table below
. .

mu must ensure th e tolal s updat e**uccordi11g~~·.** 

## 1 / they do 1101. clic.:k (or Toh) illl o ond then ou t <!l th e c hon l!.ed cell
. E s tim a t e d C os t s : Act ion Cos t s pe r Product (e.g., a ircraft , engine, (e.g
. , In s pection , J> r opellcr, appl i a nc e) Work-hour s Labo r Pa rt s Cos t To tal Costs Num ber of Total Cost r ep la ce m e nt) ( includ e cost ( lab or + 

## u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do n o t include o nco ndition cos t s h ere access , t es tin g, ( @$ 85 / h par ts) R eg i s tered and close- up) o u r ) Prod u c t s R ev i se mai nt e n a nce/ i n spec 1.0 $0 

### 4 ti on program
:· 'l I Ill II I ll I •I 

### ' II II\ !'•


# .. '){ I 

### 1: •.• "0{' I II ' l•t \I 1 )I. 

## ,, f l I I ' I



# . I

,. ! (I {'f (\ II I 1 () 'I' I I tl •i ' I I I I) 

### ' I ilfl II ,, I T he known n umbe r of products in compl i ance: T o t a l Costs o f compliance for 

### U.S. fle et: 

## s 340 Cos t s cove red und e r war r anty (if known) $ O n -Co nditi o n Costs : Ac ti o n Work

- hour s Labor cos t Part s Cost Cos t per Product (e.g
. . In s p ec tion , ( inclu de access, ( @ $85 / hour)

r ep l acement) t es tin g, a nd close

up )**\.J N~tri,**  

### A h 20/'f
- 

### J r, -/'t**_a.~l(** A, r--.. ,_ 

### '·

. fu-rl / /k./J-1 

## "" ..::r ) 

### 6n:r< ,if 

### 3v tvrdr- 

## h .&- {) 'I.AA**~tff $~I**  11lJt1 

## ler....tl..,.. ""' lv 

### I t::'IVCA.. "' .£.., 

### J v 

## , S p ec ial c o n s id e ration s for Eco nomi c A n a l ys i s (Use th is field to expla in anything in th e Estimated Costs table that was assu m ed or mi gh t n o t be obvio u s . This field ca n also be u sed to e. rpla in warranty cos ts):**~**

### E xecut i ve Ord er 12866: 

### Co uld th e A D be co ns i de r ed a " s i gni fi cant r eg ul at o r y

# ac**ti ~**  Y ES* 

# 0 NO 

### cgj
* E x p la n atio n: DOT Regulatory Polici es a nd Procedures: 

### I s t he A D s i gn ifi ca nt ? 

# G Y ES* 

# 0 NO 

### cgj *Ex p la na ti o n: Regulatory Fle x ibili ty Ac t: 

### W ill th e AD h ave a s i g ni fica nt eco nom i c im p ac t on a s ub s ta nt i al numb er o f sma ll e ntiti es ? Ex pl a in fo r e ith e r a Yes o r No an s we r. 

# G YES 

# 0 N O 

### cgj E

x p la na t io n : lnt..a s tate Aviation in A l aska: 

### T hi s A D co uld aff ec t intra s tat e av i at i on i n A l as ka
. I s it ap pro pr i ate to in c lud e s pe c ific r e qu ir e m e nt s f o r a irc ra ft o pe rat e d i n A Ia s ka w he r e av iat ion migh t be t he o nl y m o de of tra nspo rt at io n ? 

# 0 Y E S* 

# 0 NO 

### cgj
* E x pla na ti on:
************************ 

* MONOGRAPH NO.: lB5 

************************ 

ITEM: Spaghetti w/Meatballs In Sauce, Shelf Stable, ckd. (SMS) 

NSN: 8940-01-151-6921 ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR-S-010 Tray Can 

 (6 lb 14 oz or 3.12 kg net wt) 

 8940-01-455-1880 ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR-S-012 Poly Tray 

 (5 lb 13oz or 2.64 kg net wt) 

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 257 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM: 

APPEARANCE: Round, slightly irregular meatballs and plump 

pieces of spaghetti with a thick sauce containing a few black 

pepper specks. Color profile: Cream colored spaghetti, dark brown 

meatballs, and a light red-orange sauce. 

ODOR: Typical of a fully cooked pasta product containing 

Tomato, beef and herbs. 

FLAVOR: Typical of a fully cooked pasta product containing 

Tomato, beef, and herbs. A slight salt aroma is noticeable. 

TEXTURE: Soft, densely packed pasta, which is slightly dry. 

Inspectors will notice a low sauce level in relation to the 

amount of pasta. 

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT 70 DEGREES F: 36 months 

 80 DEGREES F: 24 months 

 90 DEGREES F: 18 months 

 100 DEGREES F: 12 months 

EXPECTED DETERIORATIVE CHANGES

APPEARANCE: Expect little or no change in appearance; may 

darken slightly. 

ODOR: May exhibit a slight loss of spice aroma. 

FLAVOR: Meatballs may become slightly dry and/or bland; slight 

loss of spice flavor; very slight bitter tomato flavor. 

TEXTURE: Spaghetti may become softer. 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None.

SPECIAL NOTES: Spaghetti is initially soft after retorting but 

firms up during storage. Can is designed to yield 12 servings of approximately 

1 cup each (each serving shall include 2 meatballs) (251 grams).
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 3980 STANDARD 53.66 4.29 9.18

Tolerance

1 3980A THIN LIMIT 55.11 4.33 9.03 1.45 0.04 -0.15 0.67

2 3980B THIN YELLOWGREEN LIMIT 55.26 4.04 9.43 1.60 -0.25 0.25 0.92

3 3980C GREEN LIMIT 54.22 3.97 9.21 0.56 -0.32 0.03 0.60

4 3980D RED LIMIT 54.17 4.59 9.28 0.51 0.30 0.10 0.49

5 3980E FULL ORANGE 

LIMIT 52.95 4.40 9.84 -0.71 0.11 0.66 0.69

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT May 15, 2023

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, PLAIN WEAVE, 

POLYESTER/COTTON 65/35

GL-PD 19010

(CLASS 2)

Shade Number HERITAGE TAN 566 Piece/Roll Number 3980
No. 10-10699.

#### Fred Ray, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 812, 132 S. Ct. 86,

181 L. Ed. 2d 16,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6866.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 **Certification
        by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350,
        as
        Adopted**
 **Pursuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 Pursuant
        to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, Barbara Duncan, hereby certify that,
        to the
        best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DOV
        Pharmaceutical, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”)
        fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained
        in
        the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of DOV Pharmaceutical, Inc.
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        DOV and will be retained by DOV and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
        Commission or its staff upon request.
  Date: November
                9, 2005
              By:
              /s/ Barbara
                DuncanBarbara
                  Duncan
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
 This
        certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except
        to the
        extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
        of
        Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such
        certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
        filing
        under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
        Act,
        except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
        reference.
No. 11-6904.

#### Reyes Cabrera, Petitioner v. Michael McCall, Warden.

565 U.S. 1119, 132 S. Ct. 1012,

181 L. Ed. 2d 749,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 319.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 437 Fed. Appx. 234.
No. 11-6667.

#### Orlando Cortez Clark, Petitioner v. Colorado.

565 U.S. 1081, 132 S. Ct. 819,

181 L. Ed. 2d 530,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8731.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.
No. 11-7226.

#### Evelio Flores-Santos, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1087, 132 S. Ct. 834,

181 L. Ed. 2d 540,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8715.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 425 Fed. Appx. 746.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 92 (Tuesday, May 13, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 27363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11068]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary of Transportation

[Docket No. DOT-OST-2014-0067]

Emergency Order Providing for Local Notification of High-Volume 
Rail Transport of Bakken Crude Oil

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary of Transportation (OST), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of issuance and availability of Emergency Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On May 7, 2014, the U.S. Secretary of Transportation issued an 
Emergency Order (EO), that requires that each railroad operating trains 
containing more than 1,000,000 gallons of Bakken crude oil 
(approximately 35 tank cars) in a particular state to provide the State 
Emergency Response Commission notification regarding the expected 
movement of such trains through the counties in that state.
    The full text of the EO can be accessed by going to 
www.regulations.gov and searching for docket number: DOT-OST-2014-0067.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For any questions regarding compliance 
with the EO, please contact the team at the Federal Railroad 
Administration's Office of Safety at (202) 493-6245. For questions 
concerning this notice of availability, contact: Brett Jortland, Deputy 
Assistant General Counsel, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, 20590; telephone (202) 366-4723.

    Issued in Washington, DC on May 9, 2014.
Kathryn Sinniger,
Assistant General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-11068 Filed 5-9-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 8, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00397

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.D.A., S.A.A., D.S.A ., Children,

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2013EM506191

Ho norable Eric Rodriguez, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant , proceeding pro se, has filed a request for a copy of the appellate record for the purpose of preparing his brief. Appellant f iled a timely notice of appeal in the trial court on May 28, 2014. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.1(a)

. Thereafter, appellant filed an untimely affidavit of indigence in this court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(c)(1). In our order issued July 2, 2014, we notified the trial court clerk, court reporter, and other parties of the opportunity to file a contest

to appellant’s affidavit of indigence. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1 (d)(2), (e). No contest was filed. Therefore, the affidavit of indigence is deemed true and appellant is considered to be indigent.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(f). The clerk’s record was filed on July 18, 2014

, a nd the court reporter filed a CD of the audio transcript on August 21, 2014

. Because appellant is indigent he is entitled to receive a free copy of the appellate record. Accordingly, the clerk of this Court is ORDERED to prom ptly provide appellant with a copy of the clerk’s record and a copy of the CD
of th e audio transcript.

The appellant’s brief is currently due on September 22, 2014

.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereun to set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 8th day of September, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle
Clerk of Court
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: ___________________________ Project No.: 0172.07.005.507 DISTRIBUTION

Page _1 _ of __1

_

Project Name: 304(m) Annual Review

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Outgoing Call Date: 6/29/2010 Time: 10:40 am EST

Company Name: UOP LLC (AL0002666) Contact Name: Rick Frain

Phone No.: (251) 330-7246

Name: Elizabeth Sabol Eastern Research Group

GENERAL SUBJECT : Aluminum Discharges Reported to DMR in 2008



### TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

I called UOP LLC on June 29, 2010, to speak with Jere Trigg regar ding aluminum discharges from Outfalls 003 and 004, reported to DMR in 2008. I left him a message identifying myself and the reason I was calling. I asked him to return my call or forward my information to the correct contact. On Tuesday, June 29, Rick Frain returned my call. Mr. Frain and I briefly discussed the aluminum discharges that I needed to confirm. I provided the reported concentrations in the DMR database to him an d also the average flow in MGD. Mr. Frain said that he would check the DMR reports and call me back with the correct information.

Mr. Frain returned my call and confirmed the aluminum dis charges for Outfalls 003 and 004 (storm water runoff). He stated that the flow reported to DMR in 2008 ha d the incorrect units. He provided the correct flows for the reporting periods June and December 2008. The follo wing table shows the original flow rates from

DMR and the corrected flow rates. I told Mr. Frain that we would use this data to correct the database.

Flow Data for UOP LLC for 2008

Outfall Monitoring Period

Date Original

Flow Rate (MGD) Corrected Flow

Rate (MGD)

003 30-Jun-08 31.86 3.186

003 31-Dec-08 20.33 2.033

004 30-Jun-08 25.52 2.552

004 31-Dec-08 16.29 1.629
No. 11-6758.

#### In re Neville Porras, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 1012, 132 S. Ct. 565,

181 L. Ed. 2d 417,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8045.

November 7, 2011.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 16, 2019

Order 

Clerk

July 16, 2019

159865-7(200)

SEBASTIAN KUHLGERT, Conservator of

ELISABETH OSTENDORF,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 159865, 159866

v COA: 332442, 338363

Ct of Claims: 15-000047-MZ

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY, and

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MICHIGAN

STATE UNIVERSITY,

Defendants,

and

UNITED EDUCATORS,

Intervening Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________

ELISABETH OSTENDORF,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

and

UNITED EDUCATORS,

Intervening Plaintiff-Appellant,

and

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Intervening Plaintiff,

SC: 159867

v COA: 344533

MCAC: 17-000013

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Inland Press Company to file a brief

amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on July 15, 2019, is accepted for 

filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3616 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3616

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
designate per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances as toxic pollutants under 
    the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 2, 2019

     Mr. Pappas (for himself, Ms. Slotkin, Mr. Brendan F. Boyle of 
Pennsylvania, and Ms. Kuster of New Hampshire) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
designate per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances as toxic pollutants under 
    the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clean Water Standards for PFAS Act 
of 2019''.

SEC. 2. PFAS DESIGNATION, EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS, AND PRETREATMENT 
              STANDARDS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
shall revise the list of toxic pollutants described in paragraph (1) of 
section 307(a) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 
1317(a)) to add per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances to such list, and 
publish such revised list, without taking into account the factors 
listed in such paragraph.
    (b) Effluent Standards.--As soon as practicable after the date on 
which the revised list is published under subsection (a), but not later 
than January 1, 2022, the Administrator shall publish in the Federal 
Register effluent standards under section 307(a)(2) of the Federal 
Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1317(a)(2)) for substances added 
to the list of toxic pollutants pursuant to subsection (a) of this 
section, in accordance with sections 301(b)(2)(A) and 304(b)(2) of such 
Act.
    (c) Pretreatment Standards.--Not later than January 1, 2022, the 
Administrator shall promulgate pretreatment standards for per- and 
polyfluoroalkyl substances under section 307(b) of the Federal Water 
Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1317(b)).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001067173
<NAME> SPG REALTY CONSULTANTS INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          23,546
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      499<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F2>
<PP&E>                                          33,397
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F2>
<BONDS>                                            991
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,744
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,754<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,150
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,283
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,013
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (742)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (193)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (549)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (549)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (549)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.99)
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are stated net of allowances.
<F2>The Company does not report using a classified balance sheet.
<F3>Includes limited partner's interest in the SRC Operating Partnership of $7,053.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-7031.

#### Bradley Maurice James, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1071, 132 S. Ct. 790,

181 L. Ed. 2d 505,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8318.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 439 Fed. Appx. 219.
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 16246 STANDARD 14.21 -0.07 1.33

Tolerance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Shade Number BLACK 3238 Piece/Roll Number 16246

DLA/NAVY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT July 17, 2017

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, FLEECE, POLYESTER PD 12-06B

(NUGGET)

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - 

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp 

OFF
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

** **

**World Omni Financial Corp.**

**Servicer Compliance Statement**

**Pursuant to Item 1123**

**of Regulation AB**

** **

I, William J. Shope,do hereby certify that I am the Group Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation,and further certify on behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under theSale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2017 (the “Agreement”), among World Omni Auto Receivables Trust2017-B, as Issuing Entity, World Omni Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and the Servicer, as follows:

 

(i)       Areview of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on form 10-K forthe fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Agreement, has beenmade under my supervision.

 

(ii)       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreementin all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuntoset my hand as of March 9, 2018.
No. 11-5708.

#### Donald Messina, Petitioner v. Michael S. Marshall, et al.

565 U.S. 1102, 132 S. Ct. 871,

181 L. Ed. 2d 568,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8893.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 949, 132 S. Ct. 410, 181 L. Ed. 2d 269, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7449.
29 September 2009 ******************************

NSN: 8940 01 578 9100 (SWBB) * MONOGRAPH NO: M2B24

 ******************************

Item: Southwest Style Beef and Black Beans with Sauce

Document: PCR-S-018, Southwest Style Beef and Black Beans with Sauce, Packaged in a 

Flexible Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 300 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Beef strips: Whole muscle, random length strips (5/8 inch in width and not less than 1 

inch in length), cooked beef color with grill marks.

Black beans: Practically free of broken, mashed beans or loose skins.

Tomatoes: 3/4 inch dices, cooked red tomato color.

Corn: Whole kernel, cooked yellow corn color.

Green and red bell pepper: Dices, cooked pepper color.

Onion: Pieces, translucent appearance of cooked onion.

Sauce: Glossy, medium brown color.

Odor: Cooked, grilled beef, cooked black beans and vegetables in a tomato and beef based 

sauce.

Flavor:

Cooked, grilled beef, cooked black beans and vegetables in a tomato and beef based 

sauce; flavored with mild Southwestern style seasonings. Elicits a sensation of mild 

heat.

Texture:

Beef strips: Moist and tender but not dry or stringy.

Black beans: Slightly soft to slightly firm.

Corn: Slightly soft to slightly firm.

Tomatoes, green and red bell peppers, and onions: Tender. 

Sauce: Moderately thick.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance:

Beef: Excessively darkened scorched surface or interior. Sauce: Darkened, oiling off,

excessively thick or thin.

Odor: Scorched, sour, bitter, metallic, rancid.

Flavor: Scorched, sour, bitter, metallic, rancid.

Texture: Beef: Dry, chewy, tough, or mushy. Vegetables: Excessively mushy. Sauce: 

Excessively thick or thin.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

N/A