alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        I, Donald J. Carter, Jr., as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Home Interiors & Gifts, Inc., (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

        (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending March 31,
2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated:  May 12, 2003

                                            /s/ Donald J. Carter, Jr.
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Donald J. Carter, Jr.
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-5038.

#### Edwin Hart Turner, Petitioner v. Christopher B. Epps, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 1115, 132 S. Ct. 998,

181 L. Ed. 2d 742,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 388.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 412 Fed. Appx. 696.
SCPW-24-0000076
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

________________________________________________________________ GARRETH A. GRAHAM , Petitioner,

vs. FIRST CIRCUIT COURT, STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I; and HAWAI ʻ I PAROLING AUTHORITY, Respondents.

________________________________________________________________ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NO. 1CPN-19-0000005 ) ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ( By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna , Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.) Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus filed February 5, 2024, and the record, Petitioner may seek relief from the Intermediate Court of Appeals in the pendingappeal of the circuit court’s ruling on the petition for postconviction relief. This appeal is under case number CAAP-23- 0000736. An extraordinary writ from this court is unwarranted.
See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawai ʻ i 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023). Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-24-0000076 05-APR-2024 07:51 AM Dkt. 7 ODDP2 It is ordered that the petition is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, April 5, 2024. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza /s/ Vladimir P. Devens
**Exhibit 12.****1**

 

I, Xiaochuan Wang, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Sogou Inc.; and

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date: April 23, 2020                    |                 |
|----------------------------------------------|----------------------|
|                                         |                 |
| By:                                          | /s/ Xiaochuan   Wang |   |
| Name: Xiaochuan   Wang                       |                 |
| Title:   Chief Executive   Officer |                 |
|                                              |                      |  |

 

----
No. 11-7729.

#### Hector Jimenez-Torres, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1168, 132 S. Ct. 1118,

181 L. Ed. 2d 998,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 864.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                                0001066849
<NAME>                                      SITE2SHOP.COM, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1
<CURRENCY>                                          U.S. DOLLAR


<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                             909,400
<SECURITIES>                                        90,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,171,811
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (282,902)
<INVENTORY>                                        358,958
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,431,057
<PP&E>                                           1,534,554
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (595,072)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,439,965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,399,456
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            12,515
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,032,006)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,439,965
<SALES>                                          5,332,746
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,332,746
<CGS>                                            1,827,798
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,827,798
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,493,728
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,011,220
<INCOME-TAX>                                       372,268
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                638,952
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       638,952
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .05



</TABLE>
29 June 2007 ************************ 

NSN: 8920-01-503-0685 * MONOGRAPH NO: 3A15 

 ************************

Item: Devil’s fudge cake with white icing (DFC) 

Document: PCR-C-024, Cakes, Brownies, and Mini Loaves, Packaged in a Polymeric Tray, 

Shelf Stable 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 160 Component Classification: Secondary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance: 

Cake: fully baked, uniform cell (crumb) structure, and no evidence of compression 

streaks; deep, chocolate brown. 

Icing shiny, white. 

Odor: Cake: medium sweet chocolate. 

Icing: sweet. 

Flavor: Cake: medium sweet chocolate. 

Icing: sweet. 

Texture: Cake: dense, tender, moist, fine grain. 

Icing: smooth and easily spreadable. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Cake: dry; surface may not have a very dark brown color. 

Icing: darkened, separated, oily. 

Odor: Cake: slightly sour, low chocolate, heat stressed; musty. 

Icing: rancid; off. 

Flavor: Cake: bitter; heat stressed; low chocolate. 

Icing: rancid; plastic. 

Texture: Cake: dry; stale; crumbly; dense, excessively moist. 

Icing: crystallized; weepy. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA 

Special Notes

NA
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4701 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4701

To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) to extend 
the authorization of appropriations for the Office of Government Ethics 
                       through fiscal year 2011.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2006

  Mr. Chabot introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the 
 Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) to extend 
the authorization of appropriations for the Office of Government Ethics 
                       through fiscal year 2011.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Office of Government Ethics 
Authorization Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 405 of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) 
is amended by striking ``2002 through 2006'' and inserting ``2007 
through 2011''.
                                 <all>
```
************************* 

 * MONOGRAPH NO: 1A1J 

 ************************* 

ITEM: Sweet and Sour Pork, Shelf Stable (SSP) PRIMARY 

NSN: 8940 01 504 4246 ITEM SPECIFICATION: PCR-P-032 Poly Tray 

 8940 01 504 4256 PCR-P-031 Tray Can 

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 151 Kcals 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM: 

APPEARANCE: Translucent yellow-brown, smooth, moderately thick, 

glossy sauce with a blend of 3⁄4 inch browned pork cubes, pineapple chunks, 

and small dices of red bell pepper and green bell pepper. 

ODOR: Typical sweet and sour sauce. Vinegar. Some fruity pineapple and some 

bell pepper odor. Slight cooked/processed pork odor. 

FLAVOR: Sweet and sour oriental sauce. Sweet initially with sour to follow. 

Fruity, pineapple, bell pepper. Cooked pork. 

TEXTURE: Slightly dry, tender, chewy fibrous pork. Moderately thick 

smooth somewhat gelatinous starchy sauce. Moist, soft, firm cooked 

pineapple. Soft vegetables. 

 

 ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 80 DEGREES F: 36 months (3 years) 

 100 DEGREES F: 6 months 

 

POSSIBLE DETERIORATIVE CHANGES: 

Appearance: Darkened and cloudy sauce. Darkened meat, fruit, and 

vegetable pieces. 

Odor: Loss of sweet and sour odor or increased sour odor, loss of pineapple 

identity, reduced spice level, rancid, oxidized, musty. 

Flavor: Loss of sweet and sour flavor or increased sour sauce, loss of 

sweetness or increased starch flavor, overcooked meat, reduced spice level, 

rancidity development, oxidized, musty. 

Texture: Very dry, tough pork dices. Thinned, thickened, lumpy, or grainy 

sauce. Separation of sauce. Softening of fruit. Indistinct vegetable pieces. 

 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: None
#### Harry A. Meola, *Appellant,*v. George E. Crim and Lavina Crim, his Wife, *Appellees.*

Division B.

Decision Filed June 3, 1926.

*McCnne, Casey, Hiaasen & Fleming,*for Appellant;

*Clark, Clark & Maiden,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon .the, transcript of -the. record of the. *1034decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the x-espective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said deeiee; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Cilcuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 06727**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### 06727\06727_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 06727\06727_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 06727\06727_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 06727\06727_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 06727\06727_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06727\06727_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06727\06727_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06727\06727_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06727\06727_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06727\06727_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 06727\Supporting Documents\06727_Coverletter.pdf Cover letter 

### 06727\Supporting Documents\06727_Map 1_Plant ID 6727.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06727\Supporting Documents\06727_Water-Balance_Plant ID 6727.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
No. 10-11155.

#### John-Pierre Baney, Petitioner v. Merit Systems Protection Board.

565 U.S. 933, 132 S. Ct. 378,

181 L. Ed. 2d 239,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6423.

October 3, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Leave to proceed as a veteran granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 407 Fed. Appx. 455.
RONNIE MYRICK, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3781

__________________________/

Opinion filed April 3, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County.

John H. Skinner, Judge.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Laurel Cornell Niles, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Jason W. Rodriguez and Jennifer J. Moore, 

Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
No. 11-7963.

#### Rodolfo B. Torres, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1183, 132 S. Ct. 1157,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1028,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 939.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
**CERTIFICATIONS***
Exhibit 31.2
I, Glen W. Fausset, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First National Bancshares, Inc.;
2.      Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report;
3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report;
4.      The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures asof a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “EvaluationDate”); and  c)  Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5.      The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)  All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses ininternal controls; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
6.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly reportwhether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors thatcould significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recentevaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.        Date: May 10, 2005 /s/ *Glen W. Fausset*   Title: Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                                            5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                     1,000

<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                    APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                      DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                              86
<SECURITIES>                                                     1,191
<RECEIVABLES>                                                      903
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 2,379
<PP&E>                                                           5,323
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   9,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            4,054
<BONDS>                                                          1,133
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                                      20,291
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     9,198
<SALES>                                                          7,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 7,000
<CGS>                                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   11,532
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  71
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (4,532)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (4,532)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (4,532)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                      (2.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    (2.01)



</TABLE>
Exhibit
21  FAMILY
DOLLAR STORES, INC. Listing
of Active Corporations and other Entities  Family Dollar Stores, Inc. Family Dollar, Inc. Family Dollar Holdings, Inc. Family Dollar Services, Inc. Family Dollar Operations, Inc. Family Dollar Trucking, Inc. Family Dollar Merchandising, L.P. Family Dollar Distribution, L.P. Family Dollar Stores of Alabama, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of Colorado, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of Connecticut, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of Delaware, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of D.C., Inc. Family Dollar Stores of Florida, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of Georgia, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of Indiana, L.P. Family Dollar Stores of Iowa, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of Kentucky, Ltd. Family Dollar Stores of Louisiana, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of Maryland, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of Massachusetts, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of Michigan, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of Mississippi, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of Missouri, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of New Jersey, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of New Mexico, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of New York, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of North Carolina, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of Ohio, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of Oklahoma, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of Pennsylvania, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of Rhode Island, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of South Carolina, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of South Dakota, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of Tennessee, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of Texas, L.P. Family Dollar Stores of Vermont, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of Virginia, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of West Virginia, Inc. Family Dollar Stores of Wisconsin, Inc.
#### Frank Roberts, *Plaintiff in*Error, v. State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed April 28 1926.

W. *P. Ghmous,*for Plaintiff in Error:

*J. B. Johnson,*Atty. Geni, and *II. E. Carter,*Asst., for Defendant in Error.

Buford, J.

— The plaintiff in error was indicted on the *69423rd day of June, 1925, in the Honorable Circuit Court of Taylor County, Florida, being charged in such indictment with the crime of murder in the first degree. Frank Roberts was convicted of the crime of murder of the first degree and was recommended to mercy, and was sentenced to serve the period of his natural life in the State prison; from which judgment he brings writ of error.

There are three assignments of error:

“1. The verdict of the jury is not supported by the evidence. ’ ’

“2nd. The verdict of the jury is against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.”

“3rd. There is no evidence to show a premeditated design on the part of the plaintiff in error to kill the deceased.”

We have carefully considered the evidence in this case, and while the evidence (as is true of nearly all homicide cases) is conflicting there is ample evidence upon which a fair and reasonable jury could base a verdict of murder in the first degree as there is evidence to support every element of such offense.

The trial court heard the evidence and exercising a sound discretion denied the motion for a new trial. “Trial courts have much more latitude of discretion in granting new trials on the evidence than have the appellate courts.” Carney v. Stringfellow, 73 Fla. 700, 74 So. 866. Where there is any evidence to support the verdict, the verdict will not be set aside as against the evidence, unless it may well be assumed that the jury were improperly influenced by considerations outsidQ the evidence. Sherman v. State, 17 Fla. 888, Anderson v. State, 24 Fla. 139, 3 So. 884; Hicks v. State, 25 Fla. 535, 6 So. 441; Barnhill v. State, 56 Fla. 16, 48 So. 251; McDonald v. State, 56 Fla. 74, 47 So. 485.

*695Tbe judgment will therefore be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell, J., concur.

Brown, C. J., and Ellis and Strum, J. J., concur in the opinion.