alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Date: 30 July 2021 *********************

NSN: 8960-01-691-7254 (TBL) * MONOGRAPH M7V

 ********************* 

Item: Tropical blend (Flavor I)

Document: PCR-F-005, Fruit and Vegetable Blend Juice Smoothie Powder, Packaged in a 

Flexible Pouch, Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 120 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 3 years at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Powdered: Uniform blend of dry, homogenous, orange and yellow powder with tan 

colored specks.

Hydrated: Uniform medium orange color with a fine pulp and no discernable lumps.

Odor: Powdered: Moderate mango, carrot, pineapple and fruity sweet and fruity sour.

Hydrated: Moderate pineapple and mango and slight carrot.

Flavor: Hydrated: Moderate pineapple and mango and slight carrot.

Texture:

Powdered: Free-flowing and no discernable lumps that cannot be broken apart under 

light pressure.

Hydrated: Smooth with a fine pulp and have a slightly thin consistency with no 

discernable lumps or chalkiness.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance:

Powdered: Darkened, clumped (not easily separated).

Hydrated: Darkened, undissolved particles, discernable lumps.

Odor: Powdered and Hydrated: Burnt, fermented, scorched.

Flavor: Hydrated: Burnt, fermented, scorched.

Texture:

Powdered: Caked or lumpy, not free flowing

Hydrated: Not smooth, very thin consistency, particles fail to disperse when hydrated, 

discernable lumps, chalkiness.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Initial exam shall be done in the dry state. The powder, when hydrated according to label directions, 

shall dissolve within 2 minutes of constant shaking. 

Special Notes

Service is significantly affected if the powder is caked. Caking is an indication of high moisture levels, 

absence of anticaking ingredient and/or extremely high storage temperatures, i.e., over 125°F for more 

than one month.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Carlo Alberto Sisto, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2017-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                      I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                      All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

 

March 23, 2020

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Carlo Alberto Sisto                                          |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Carlo Alberto Sisto                                              |
|   | Title: | President (senior   officer in charge of the servicing function) |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7755

DEE DEIDRE FARMER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARGARET C. HAMBRICK, Regional Director; JOHN

W. SHORE, Deputy Regional Director; ROGER

TILDEN, Regional Hearing Administrator,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA95-3633-CCB)

Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 2, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dee Deidre Farmer, Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
1 See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of

Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

2 515 U.S. 472 (1995).

3 See United States v. Williams, 674 F.2d 310, 312 (4th Cir.

1982).

2

PER CURIAM:

Dee Deidre Farmer appeals from the district court's orders

dismissing her Bivens1 civil rights complaint, and denying her

motion for reconsideration filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e).

Our review of the record discloses that this appeal is without

merit. The sole issue raised in Farmer’s informal brief is that her

placement in administrative segregation and subsequent commitment

to controlled housing status in prison violated her due process

rights. We find that the district court’s reliance on Sandin v.

Conner2 in rejecting this claim is sound. In addition, because

Farmer's motion for reconsideration does not demonstrate that her

action was improperly dismissed, we find that the district court's

denial of her Rule 59(e) motion was not an abuse of discretion.3 We

deny Farmer’s motion for appointment of counsel, and affirm both

district court orders. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                     PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anthony & Sylvan Pools Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Stuart
D. Neidus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                       section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                       1934; and

                  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                       in all material respects, the financial condition and
                       results of operations of the Company.


Stuart D. Neidus
---------------------------
Stuart D. Neidus
Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  November 14, 2002



                                      17
No. 11-6377.

#### In re Anne Sears, Petitioner.

565 U.S. 976, 132 S. Ct. 524,

181 L. Ed. 2d 390,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7682.

October 31, 2011.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
applicable SEC Form and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,108
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,753
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,156
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,119
<PP&E>                                          25,029
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,347
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,213
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,690
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,952
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,801
<SALES>                                         47,220
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,220
<CGS>                                           23,653
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,653
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,257
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  66
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,244
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,112
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,132
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,132
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.25<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.23<F1>
<FN>
<F1>SHARES AND EARNINGS PER SHARE HAVE BEEN ADJUSTED IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND IN THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE TO REFLECT A TWO-FOR-ONE STOCK SPLIT
EFFECTED IN THE FORM OF A DIVIDEND WHICH WAS EFFECTIVE AS OF SEPTEMBER 22,
1997.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
DLA/ARMY SHADE TOLERANCE PILOT PROJECT January 31, 

2013

Fabric Nomenclature NYLON 500 Denier

Shade Number FOLIAGE GREEN 504 Piece/Roll Number ROLL 3780

Equipment type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included -

Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp 

OFF

ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard -------------------- 42.34 -1.70 3.39

Tolerance

1

3780* Full Red limit -2.55 0.32 -0.29 1.38

2

3780*

Light Red 

limit 0.9 0.74 0.08 1.04

3

3780* Green limit 0.52 -0.64 -0.37 0.97

4

3780* Blue limit -1.23 0.1 -0.7 1.03

5

6

7

8

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY

* represents tolerances that were established prior to procedure to letter tolerances was established
No. 11-508.

#### Omaha Tribe of Nebraska, aka Omaha Nation, Petitioner v. Store Visions, Inc.

565 U.S. 1112, 132 S. Ct. 1016,

181 L. Ed. 2d 736,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 395.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nebraska denied.

*737Same case below, 281 Neb. 238, 795 N.W.2d 271.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 38 (Friday, February 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 8978]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4160]



[[Page 8978]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Funding Opportunity

AGENCY: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of intent to award a Single Source Grant to the Tarzana 
Treatment Center, Reseda, CA.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is to inform the public that the Substance Abuse 
and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) intends to award 
approximately $509,000 (total costs) per year for up to two years to 
the Tarzana Treatment Center, Reseda, CA. This is not a formal request 
for applications. Assistance will be provided only to the Tarzana 
Treatment Center based on the receipt of a satisfactory application 
that is approved by an independent review group.
    Funding Opportunity Title: SM-09-015.
    Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 93.243.

    Authority: Sections 520A of the Public Health Service Act, as 
amended.

    Justification: Only the Tarzana Treatment Center, Reseda, CA is 
eligible to apply. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration (SAMHSA) is seeking to award a single source grant to 
the Tarzana Treatment Center. Competition is limited to the Tarzana 
Treatment Center because it is presently funded through the Mental 
Health HIV Services Collaborative program. Several factors support the 
justification of a single source award to the intended applicant in 
order to maintain the integrity and consistency of the services of this 
grant activity. The grant award was for three years instead of five 
years because of an error in the application process. The current grant 
ends September 30, 2009. The Tarzana Treatment Center is in year-three 
of a process of providing treatment for over 100 individuals with HIV 
and co-occurring mental health disorders at various stages of recovery. 
The program's cross-site evaluation is planned as a five-year effort 
that includes all grantees and combines with SAMHSA's National Outcome 
Measures (NOMS) for site and program analysis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shelly Hara, Substance Abuse and 
Mental Health Services Administration, 1 Choke Cherry Road, Room 8-
1081, Rockville, MD 20857; telephone: (240) 276-2321; E-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ceff4f9f0f0e5b2f4fdeefddceffdf1f4effdb2f4f4efb2fbf3ea"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ffce7eae3e3f6a1e7eefdeecffceee2e7fceea1e7e7fca1e8e0f9">[email protected]</span></a>.

Toian Vaughn,
SAMHSA Committee Management Officer.
 [FR Doc. E9-4160 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 11-7044.

#### Antonio Ciranda-Sanchez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1071, 132 S. Ct. 791,

181 L. Ed. 2d 506,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8348.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 448 Fed. Appx. 696.
No. 10-9792.

#### Saied Mousa Ramadan, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1177, 132 S. Ct. 1141,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1016,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 993,

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

*1017Same case below, 390 Fed. Appx. 261.
Order issued November 7, 2012 

In The 

(Court of Appeals 

JJiiftJ Eristrirt at &exas at Dallas 

No. 05-11-00279-CV 

YVONNE BROWN, Appellant 

V. 

FALLS ON CLEARWOOD, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-10-07137-A 

ORDER 

Before the Court is appellant's October 19, 2012 motion for rehearing. The Court requests 

that appellee file a response by November 19, 2012.
##### 



CERTIFICATE OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF
AMERICAN CELLULAR CORPORATION
  a.
    
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and thatb.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of the Company at September 30, 2007, and the results of the Companys
operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007.
 November 9, 2007
    
    /s/ STEVEN P. DUSSEKSteven P. DussekChief Executive Officer and Director(principal executive officer)
 32
#### Walter Hubert Beall, *Appellant,*v. Mary Elizabeth Beall, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February *4,*1926.

*W. E. B. Smith,*for Appellant;

*Carter & Solomon,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Wi-iitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Exhibit 31

Certifications

I, Paul
Vanderslice, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and
all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2017-P8 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2.    Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, all
of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation
AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related
attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in
such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above,
I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; KeyBank National Association; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; CoreLogic Commercial Real
Estate Services, Inc.; National Tax Search, LLC; Principal Real Estate Investors, LLC; LNR Partners, LLC; Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC; AEGON USA Realty Advisors, LLC; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas; and Park
Bridge Lender Services LLC.

Date: March 29, 2018



|                                                                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paul Vanderslice                                                                                                                   
|Paul Vanderslice President, Citigroup
Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

CGCMT 2017-P8 Sarbanes-Oxley Certification (2017)
No. 11-7330.

#### Deandre Laron Washington, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1128, 132 S. Ct. 1039,

181 L. Ed. 2d 765,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 96.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 653 F.3d 1251.
Attachment 3 

Proposed Information Collection Request for the 

Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines 

EPA/OW/EAD Outreach Teleconference 

Industry Call-In Participant List 

December 8, 2009 
Partial List of Participants for Outreach Call with Industry Stakeholders on December 8, 

2009

AES Warrior Run 

Allegheny Energy 

Ameren 

American Electric Power 

Con Edison 

Consumers Energy Company 

DTE Energy 

Edison Electric Institute 

Florida Power and Light Company 

Otter Tail Power Company 

Progress Energy 

Southern Company 

Tampa Electric 

Tennessee Valley Authority 

Utility Water Act Group
No. 11-7248.

#### Kevin M. Gibbons, Petitioner v. Hugh Wolfenbarger, Warden.

565 U.S. 1161, 132 S. Ct. 1100,

181 L. Ed. 2d 986,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 828.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Date: 18 February 2021 *************************

NSN: 8940-01-691-5078 (PCP) MONOGRAPH NO: M2P2

 *************************

Item: Pizza Slice, Cheese (Type I)

Document: MIL-DTL-32541A, Pizza Slice, Shelf Stable, For Operational Rations

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 300 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

General: Square or rectangular shape and may have a crust edge; even distribution of 

visible sauce, and cheese shreds.

Pizza crust: Slightly dense and a uniform cell structure; No compression streaks.

Crust bottom surface: Docker holes; no excessive flour dusting; off-white to goldenbrown color.

Interior Crumb: Off-white color, may have some partial sauce absorption.

Sauce: Reddish-orange color; may contain visible flecks of herbs and spices.

Cheese: Partially melted; off-white to light golden-tan color.

Odor: General: Cooked tomato, cheese and Italian seasoning.

Cheese: Mild mozzarella.

Flavor:

General: Cooked tomato, cheese and Italian seasoning.

Pizza crust: Slightly sweet and sourdough.

Cheese: Mild mozzarella.

Texture:

Pizza crust: Not excessively dry, crumbly or excessively moist or gummy; slightly 

dense and a uniform cell structure.

Sauce: Tomato paste-like consistency.

Cheese: Slightly soft to slightly firm.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkened or brown pizza crust. Cracked or dry, crumbly crust. Darkened sauce or 

cheese. Excessive migration of sauce into crust.

Odor: Stale, oxidized, rancid, scorched. Loss of Italian seasoning.

Flavor: Sour, bitter, oxidized, scorched, rancid. Loss of Italian seasoning.
Date: 18 February 2021 *************************

NSN: 8940-01-691-5078 (PCP) MONOGRAPH NO: M2P2

 *************************

Texture: Dry, crumbly or gummy crust. Excessively hard cheese.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

This product should contain one intact oxygen scavenger. If defects such as oxidized or rancid odors exist, they 

are likely due to package failure or the absence of an oxygen scavenger. Some bleeding of pizza sauce into the 

pizza crust is normal but may increase over time.
No. 10-11254.

#### John E. Colwell, Petitioner v. Robert M. Stevenson, Warden.

565 U.S. 875, 132 S. Ct. 234,

181 L. Ed. 2d 132,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6623.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 403 Fed. Appx. 787.