alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

41175

Federal Register

Vol. 63, No. 147

Friday, July 31, 1998

Title 3—

The President

Notice of July 28, 1998

Continuation of Iraqi Emergency

On August 2, 1990, by Executive Order 12722, President Bush declared

a national emergency to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat

to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted

by the actions and policies of the Government of Iraq. By Executive Orders

12722 of August 2, 1990, and 12724 of August 9, 1990, the President imposed

trade sanctions on Iraq and blocked Iraqi government assets. Because the

Government of Iraq has continued its activities hostile to United States

interests in the Middle East, the national emergency declared on August

2, 1990, and the measures adopted on August 2 and August 9, 1990, to

deal with that emergency must continue in effect beyond August 2, 1998.

Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies

Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing the national emergency with respect

to Iraq.

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted

[FR Doc. 98–20704

to the Congress.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

July 28, 1998.

œ–

Filed 7–30–98; 8:45 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P
From: "Blazer, Don" <dblazer@flexcofloors.com>

To: <elizabeth.sabol@erg.com>

Date: 7/8/2010 5:57 PM Subject: Flexco Corp. DMR Clarification

Attachments: DMR Conf.-11-09-SalesCopier20100708163317.pdf

Per our conversation, here is the information on th e 2008 discharge monitoring reports for Flexco Corporation facility (AL0050377) requested.

Please call Don Blazer at 256-383-7474 - Ext. 251, if there are any questions.

Thank you, Don

From: Elizabeth Sabol

To: dblazer@flexcofloors.com

CC: Codding, Eleanor; swietlik.william@epa.gov

Date: 7/7/2010 7:59 AM Subject: DMRs Clarification Needed for Flexco Corp

Dear Mr. Blazer,

Thank you for your time on the phone yesterday. Ea stern Research Group, Inc. (ERG) under EPA Contract No. 68-C-02-095 is e-mailing you on EPA’s behalf to request informatio n on 2008 discharge monitoring reports for the Flex co Corp facility (AL0050377). Here is some background on what the information is used for.

EPA reviews publicly-available DMR data to fulfill its review obligation under Section 304(b) of the C lean Water Act. The CWA requires EPA to annually review and, if appropriate , revise its water pollution control technology-bas ed regulations, called “effluent limitations guidelines” or "effluent guidelines,” t hat limit the discharge of pollutants to waters of the U.S. from various categories of industrial facilities. EPA is currently conducting its 2010 annual review of existing effluent guidel ines and potential industrial guidelines which may need to be included (see 

### http://www.epa.gov/guide/304m/ for further information). EPA will discuss this

review and the results in its 2010 Effluent Guideli nes Program Plan scheduled for publication in the F ederal Register in December 2010. As part of the 2010 annual review, EPA is eva luating the data in discharge monitoring reports fr om 2008 and needs further information to complete the review.

We would like to obtain additional information on t he following concentration data for diethlyhexyl ph thalate from your facility. Our records show the following concentrations:

Outfall 003 Nov 2008: 109 mg/L Average Flow: 0.2892 MGD

The other concentrations in our data for 2008 were reported below the detection limit.

We appreciate your help in confirming if the above data are accurate, or if there are units errors or missing below detection limit indicators in the DMR data, as we expect.

If you have any questions regarding this request, p lease call me at (703) 633-1659. If you would like to speak directly with EPA regarding this request, you can contact William F. Swietlik of EPA's Office of Water/Engineering Analy sis Division by phone at (202) 566-1129 or by email: 

### swietlik.william@epa.gov

.

Thanks,
Elizabeth

Elizabeth A. Sabol Environmental Engineer Eastern Research Group, Inc. 14555 Avion Parkway, Suite 200 Chantilly, VA 20151elizabeth.sabol@erg.com

Phone:703-633-1659
No. 11-6103.

#### Felipe Lopez-Atanacio, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 928, 132 S. Ct. 365,

181 L. Ed. 2d 231,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 6790.

October 3, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 792.
FIRST AMENDMENT
TO LOAN AGREEMENT


 


THIS FIRST
AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of April 3, 2012 by and between the Ohio Department of Development
("ODOD") of the State of Ohio and SCI Engineered Materials, Inc., an Ohio Corporation (the "Company"), under
the circumstances summarized in the following recitals.


 


		A.	The Company obtained a loan from ODOD pursuant to the terms of a certain Loan Agreement dated as
of February 1, 2011 (the “Loan Agreement”).



 


		B.	The Company also executed Loan Documents (as defined in the Loan Agreement).



 


		C.	A February 28, 2012 amendment of the Company’s Loan Agreement with the Ohio Air Quality Development
Authority that reduced the principal amount of their loan from $1,365,780 to $368,906.17 (the “OAQDA Loan Amendment”)
would be a technical default under Section 4.2(l) of the Loan Agreement (the “Technical Default”) since the Company
failed to obtain ODOD’s prior written consent.



 


D.    Each of the Company and ODOD desire
to enter into this First Amendment to Loan Agreement in order to properly document ODOD’s consent to the Company entering
into the OAQDA Loan Amendment in order to address the Technical Default.


 


Provision


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
in consideration of the premises and the representations and agreements hereinafter contained, the ODOD and the Company agree as
follows:


 


1.    After completion of its review and due
diligence, ODOD hereby consents to the Company entering into the OAQDA Amendment and agrees that such amendment will not constitute
a default under the Loan Agreement.


 


2.    Provided the Company complies with the
other provisions of the Loan Agreement, ODOD further agrees and affirms with the Company that the original maximum available credit
amount of $744,250 under the Loan Agreement remains available and can be used for up to 70.5% of purchase price and installation
costs of the cold isostatic press or other equipment.


 


3.The parties further agree that all
remaining provisions of the Loan Agreement not modified by this First Amendment to Loan Agreement will remain in full force and
effect.


 


 


 


 


 


[signatures on next
page]


 


 



    	 



    	 



    



 


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed and delivered as of the date hereinbefore written.


 


 





	 	Ohio Department of Development
	 	 
	 	By: /s/ Christiane Schmenk
	 	                                 
	 	Title: Director
	 	 
	 	By: /s/ Kevin Potter
	 	                                 
	 	Title: Assistant Director
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	SCI ENGINEERED MATERIALS, INC., AN OHIO CORPORATION
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	By: /s/ Daniel Rooney
	 	 
	 	Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
October 30, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ALEX MOLINA, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00436-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
DLA TROOP SUPPORT CONSTRUCTION & EQUIPMENT

ATTN: FCSB, QSL OFFICE

700 ROBBINS AVE, BLDG 3/C WS-6455

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19111-5092

DLA TROOP SUPPORT FORM 1696B 04/2012 OCT 09
DLA TROOP SUPPORT FORM 1696B 04/2012
DLA TROOP SUPPORT FORM 1696B 04/2012
DLA TROOP SUPPORT FORM 1696B 04/2012
#### Maggie Anderson, *alias*Maggie Chapman, by her Next Friend, Robt. P. Crawford, *Appellant,*v. Richard D. Anderson, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February 27, 1926.

*Robert P. Crawford,*for Appellant;

*Ion L. Farris*and *Robert McNamee,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS FOR FORM 10-Q**I, Bruce R. Knooihuizen, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and principal financialofficer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Cellular Corporation, referred to as the registrant;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report isbeing prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 144 (Tuesday, July 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20061]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

ACTION: Notice of information collection to be submitted to OMB for 
review and approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the FDIC hereby gives notice that it 
plans to submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request 
for OMB review and approval of the information collection system 
described below.
    Type of Review: Renewal of a currently approved collection.
    Title: Recordkeeping and Disclosure Requirements in Connection with 
Regulation M (Consumer Leasing).
    OMB Number: 3064-0083.
    Annual Burden: Estimated annual number of respondents--6,100; 
Estimated time per response--4 hours; Average annual burden hours--
24,400 hours.
    Expiration Date of OMB Clearance: September 39, 1998.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Washington, DC 20503.
    FDIC Contact: Tamara R. Manly, (202) 898-7453, Office of the 
Executive Secretary, Room F-4058, Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation, 550 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20429.
    Comments: Comments on this collection of information are welcome 
and should be submitted on or before August 27, 1998 to both the OMB 
reviewer and the FDIC contact listed above.

ADDRESSES: Information about this submission, including copies of the 
proposed collection of information, may be obtained by calling or 
writing the FDIC contact listed above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulation M (12 CFR 2123) implements the 
consumer leasing provisions of the Truth in Lending Act. Regulation M 
is issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 
(``FRB'') under the authority of the Title I of the Consumer Credit 
Protection Act (15 U.S.C. 1601 et eq.). Section 105 of the Act (15 
U.S.C. 1604) designates the FRB as the issuer of the implementing 
regulations and section 108(a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 1607) designates 
the FDIC as having the enforcement responsibilities in the case of 
insured nonmember banks.

    Dated: July 22, 1998.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20061 Filed 7-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
No. 11-565.

#### Mark R. Holloway, aka Mark Robert Holloway, Petitioner v. Red Lion Borough.

565 U.S. 1114, 132 S. Ct. 1032,

181 L. Ed. 2d 739,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 399.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania denied.

Same case below, 11 A.3d 62.
No. 11-308.

#### Richard E. Thomas, et al., Petitioners v. Edward Alcoser, et al.

565 U.S. 1150, 132 S. Ct. 1079,

181 L. Ed. 2d 797,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 548.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 978, 132 S. Ct. 518, 181 L. Ed. 2d 350, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7890.
<page>  EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Millburn L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey A.
Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		May 16, 2005
(1) Adjusting Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $12.89 CWT 0.965 $12.44

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.9838 LB 3.5 $10.44

Class I Price $22.88

(2) Base Price

Base Skim Milk Price for Class I $12.44 CWT 0.965 $12.00

Advanced Butterfat Pricing Factor $2.7537 LB 3.5 $9.64

Class I Price $21.64

(3) Change from Base Price per CWT $1.24

(4) Price change per gallon $0.11

(Line (3) divide by 11.63 gallons/cwt)

(5) Price change per half gallon $0.05

Price change per quart $0.03

Price change per pint $0.01

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price change per half pint $0.01

(6) Price adjustment per gallon (128-oz) $0.11

Price adjustment per half gallon (64-oz) $0.05

Price adjustment per quart (32-oz) $0.03

Price adjustment per pint (16oz) $0.01

Price change per 14-oz pg. $0.01

Price change per 12-oz pg. $0.01

Price adjustment per 1/3 qt. (10-oz) $0.01

Price adjustment per half pint (8-oz) $0.01

**No price adjustment is required if the price change per-gallon, in either direction,

NOTE: Numbers in brackets are negative or decreases, all others are positives or increases. 

Monthly EPA Calculation for Class I Milk (Clause 52.216-9032)

Based on USDA Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors

Effective Date: Mar. 6th, 2022
No. 11-88.

#### Asid Mohamad, Individually and for the Estate of Azzam Rahim, Deceased, et al., Petitioners v. Palestinian Authority, et al.

565 U.S. 1104, 132 S. Ct. 994,

181 L. Ed. 2d 725,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 9.

January 6, 2012.

Motion of petitioners to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 148 (Monday, August 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 41320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20631]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA, Inc., Government/Industry Free Flight Steering Committee

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for an 
RTCA Government/Industry Free Flight Steering Committee meeting to be 
held August 19, 1998, starting at 1:00 p.m. The meeting will be held at 
the Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC, 20591, in the Bessie Coleman Conference Center, Room 
2AB.
    The agenda will include: (1) Welcome and Opening Remarks; (2) 
Review Summary of the Previous Meeting; (3) Report and Recommendations 
from the Free Flight Select Committee on a Restructured Flight 2000 
Program; (4) Report on the status and plans for the GPS/WAAS Sole Means 
Risk Assessment; (5) Other Business; (6) Date and Location of Next 
Meeting; (7) Closing Remarks.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the co-chairmen, members of the 
public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to 
present statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA, Inc., 
at (202) 833-9339 (phone), (202) 833-9434 (facsimile), or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0a6e69666b78616f4a787e696b2465786d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7f1b1c131e0d141a3f0d0b1c1e51100d18">[email protected]</span></a> (e-mail). Members of the public may present a written 
statement at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 27, 1998.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 98-20631 Filed 7-31-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 11-7278.

#### Pascual Luna, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1099, 132 S. Ct. 861,

181 L. Ed. 2d 560,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8853.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 649 F.3d 91.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 8540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4110]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Meeting; Sunshine Act

Agency Holding the Meeting: Federal Maritime Commission.

Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 
    74 FR 7894 (Feb. 20, 2009).

Previously Announced Time and Date of the Meeting: 
    February 11, 2009--11 a.m.

Change: 
    Correction of a clerical error which caused the publication of the 
incorrect agenda for the Commission meeting scheduled on February 25, 
2009.

Agency Holding the Meeting: Federal Maritime Commission.

Time and Date: February 25, 2009--10 a.m.

Place: 800 North Capitol Street, NW., First Floor Hearing Room, 
Washington, DC.

Status: A portion of the meeting will be in Open Session and the 
remainder of the meeting will be in Closed Session.

Matters To Be Considered: 

Open Session

1. Docket No. 02-15 Passenger Vessel Financial Responsibility--Request 
of Commissioner Brennan.
2. FMC Agreement No. 201200: The Houston Marine Terminal Operators/
Freight Handlers Agreement.
3. FY 2009 Budget Status Report.

Closed Session

1. Docket No. 04-09--American Warehousing of New York, Inc. v. The Port 
Authority of New York and New Jersey; Docket No. 05-03--American 
Warehousing of New York, Inc. v. The Port Authority of New York and New 
Jersey.
2. Section 15 Order on Competition, Rates and Service in the U.S.-
Australia/New Zealand and Northbound and Southbound Trade.
3. Staff Briefing Regarding Global Economic Downturn and Potential 
Impact on Stakeholders.
4. Internal Administrative Practices and Personnel Matters.

Contact Person for More Information:  Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, 
(202) 523-5725.

Tanga FitzGibbon,
Assistant Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-4110 Filed 2-23-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P