alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 38 (Friday, February 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8961-8962]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4238]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; Final 
Effect of Designation of a Class of Employees for Addition to the 
Special Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice 
concerning the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a class of 
employees at Vitro Manufacturing in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, as an 
addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy 
Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On 
January 16, 2009, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384q(b), the 
Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an 
addition to the SEC:

    All AWE employees who worked at Vitro Manufacturing in 
Canonsburg, Pennsylvania,

[[Page 8962]]

from August 13, 1942 through December 31, 1957, for a number of work 
days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely 
under this employment or in combination with work days within the 
parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in 
the Special Exposure Cohort.

This designation became effective on February 15, 2009, as provided for 
under 42 U.S.C. 7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on February 15, 2009, 
members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this notice, 
became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Elliott, Director, Office of 
Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, 
OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). 
Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#743b373527343730375a333b22"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="450a060416050601066b020a13">[email protected]</span></a>.

Christine M. Branche,
Acting Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. E9-4238 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NO. 07-01-0487-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

JULY 10, 2002

______________________________

IN RE: ALAN SCOTT GORE

_________________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

Pending before the Court is the Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by Relator Alan

Scott Gore. Relator alleges that respondent, the Honorable David Gleason, Judge of the

47

th District Court of Potter County, has failed to rule on relator’s Motion to Review the

Trial/Appellate Record on a Temporary Loan Basis which is pending in cause number

37,830-A in the 47th District Court. 

By its response to the Petition for Writ of Mandamus, the State urges that

respondent has signed an order denying relator’s motion. The State has attached a

certified copy of an order signed by respondent which denies relator’s motion. 

We deny relator’s Petition as moot. 

Phil Johnson
2

Do not publish. Justice
No. 11-5058.

#### Leroy P. Mitchell, Petitioner v. The Dallas Housing Authority.

565 U.S. 1186, 132 S. Ct. 1163,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 995.

181 L. Ed. 2d 1032,

January 23, 2012.

Petition for rehearing denied.

*1033Former decision, 565 U.S. 1062, 132 S. Ct. 757, 181 L. Ed. 2d 489, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8648.
#### W. D. Carn and J. N. Simmons, Members of and Composing the Board of Public Instruction for the County of Marion, State of Florida, and H. G. Shealy, Superintendent of Public Instruction and as Secretary of the Board of Public Instruction for Marion County, Florida, and the Board of Public Instruction for the County of Marion, State of Florida *Plaintiffs in Error,*v. The State of Florida, *ex rel.*W. T. Godwin and B. H. Smith, *Defendants in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February 8, 1825.

*Martin & Hocher,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

W. *K. Zewadshi,*for Defendants in Error.

Per Curiam.

— The writ of error herein is dismissed on the authority of Hogan v. State, 86 Fla. 361, 98 South. Rep. 70; Galvin v. Davidson, 48 Fla. 75, 37 South. Rep. 575; Yent v. State *ex rel.*Richardson, 66 Fla. 336, 63 South. Rep. 452.

Dismissed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 142 (Friday, July 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39840-39841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19768]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-354-000]


Western Gas Interstate Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

July 20, 1998.
    Take notice that on July 14, 1998, Western Gas Interstate Company 
(WGI), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to be effective 
August 1, 1998:

Third Revised Sheet No. 247
Second Revised Sheet No. 248

    WGI states that the filing was made in compliance with the 
Commission's Order No. 587-G. The tariff sheets reflect the adoption of 
the Gas Industry Standards Board's Version 1.2 standards adopted by the 
Commission in Order No. 587-G.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the

[[Page 39841]]

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 
of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests 
must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-19768 Filed 7-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 11-7454.

#### Dwayne Calais, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1131, 132 S. Ct. 1051,

181 L. Ed. 2d 772,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 268.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 428 Fed. Appx. 661.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         542,414
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,395
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,784
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,170,822
<PP&E>                                          73,087
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,911
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,022,826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,272,263
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,000
<COMMON>                                        33,099
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,339,062)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,022,826
<SALES>                                        253,112
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               513,294
<CGS>                                          204,419
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,172,243
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,637,673
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,296,622)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (10,296,622)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,296,622)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.35)


</TABLE>
No. 11-6028.

#### Dominic Robinson, Petitioner v. Burl Cain, Warden.

565 U.S. 953, 132 S. Ct. 425,

181 L. Ed. 2d 276,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7351.

October 11, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AS OF APRIL 3, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND THE CONDENSED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 3, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED
IN FORM 10-K FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 2, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                              12
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,428
<ALLOWANCES>                                       532
<INVENTORY>                                      3,599
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,774
<PP&E>                                              29
<DEPRECIATION>                                       8
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,398
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,049
<SALES>                                          1,677
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,677
<CGS>                                            1,532
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,046
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (30)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  84
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (955)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (955)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (955)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I, Scott Brogi, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A of HyreCar Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2018 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HyreCar Inc.



|Dated: April 30, 2019 | By: | /s/ Scott Brogi                                              
|--------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |     | Scott Brogi                                                  
|                      |     | Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial Officer)
#### Morrison v. State

OP 16-0507

10/04/16

Denied

Original Proceeding Supervisory Control
No. 11-5850.

#### Roy Hunt, Jr., Petitioner v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

565 U.S. 965, 132 S. Ct. 458,

181 L. Ed. 2d 298,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 7568.

October 17, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 421 Fed. Appx. 268.
# Fourth Court of Ap peals

San Antonio, Texas

March 17, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00718

- CV

VR PARTNERS I, L.P.,

Appellant

v.

MIDTEX OIL, L.P . and Juniper Ventures of Texas, LLC,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19

- 0448

- CV

- C

Hon orable William Old, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Appellees ’ Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Post Submission Brief is hereby

GRA NTED.

It is so ORDERED on March 17, 2020

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________

M ICHA E L A. CRUZ

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 150 (Wednesday, August 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 41851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20873]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2286]


Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification of Action in 
Rulemaking Proceeding

July 28, 1998.
    Petitions for reconsideration and clarification have been filed in 
the Commission's rulemaking proceedings listed in this Public Notice 
and published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of 
these documents are available for viewing and copying in Room 239, 1919 
M Street NW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's 
copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to these 
petitions must be filed August 20, 1998. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the 
Commission's rule (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be 
filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired.

Subject:
    Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission's Rules To Provide for the 
Use of the 220-222 MHz Band by the Private Land Mobile Radio Service 
(PR Docket No. 89-552, RM-8506).
    Implementation of Section 3(n) and 332 of the Communications Act 
(GN Docket No. 93-252).
    Regulatory Treatment of Mobile Services.
    Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act--
Competitive Bidding, 220-222 MHz (PP Docket No. 93-253).
Number of Petitions File: 3.

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20873 Filed 8-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Infosmart Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kwok Chung Lit, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.




Date:
      May 14, 2010
            
            /s/
      Kwok Chung LitKwok
      Chung LitChief
      Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 11-288.

#### Donald O. Boos, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al., Petitioners v. AT&T, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 1079, 132 S. Ct. 816,

181 L. Ed. 2d 526,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8772.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 643 F.3d 127.
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function 

of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)

**CERTIFICATION**

I, KevinJ. Cullum, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Lease Trust 2017-A (the“Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. I amresponsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association 

Date: June 27, 2019 

 
By: /s/ Kevin J. CullumKevin J. Cullum
President and Chief Executive Officer of

Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation

(senior officer in charge ofthe

servicing function)
**
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Before

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

No. 10-3028

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District

Plaintiff-Appellee, Court for the Northern District of

Illinois, Eastern Division.

v.

No. 03 CR 621-5

ERICK MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant. Amy J. St. Eve,

Judge.

ORDER

The slip opinion of June 16, 2011, is amended as follows:

Page 8, first full paragraph, line 1, “him” is deleted.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4664 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to reduce certain 

contribution limits under such Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2006 

Mr. CAPUANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

reduce certain contribution limits under such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTION OF LIMIT ON MAXIMUM AMOUNT 

4 OF CERTAIN CONTRIBUTIONS. 

5 (a) CONTRIBUTIONS TO CANDIDATES.—Section 

6 315(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 

7 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a(a)(1)(A)) is amended by striking 

8 ‘‘$2,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$1,000’’. 

9 (b) CONTRIBUTIONS TO NONPARTY POLITICAL COM10 MITTEES.—Section 315(a)(1)(C) of the Federal Election 
2 

•HR 4664 IH 

1 Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a(a)(1)(C)) is 

2 amended by striking ‘‘$5,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$1,000’’. 

3 (c) CONTRIBUTIONS BY MULTICANDIDATE POLIT4 ICAL COMMITTEES TO CANDIDATES.—Section 

5 315(a)(2)(A) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 441a(a)(2)) is amend6 ed by striking ‘‘$5,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$1,000’’. 

7 SEC. 2. DELAY IN IMPLEMENTATION OF INDEXING OF 

8 LIMIT ON MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF CONTRIBU9 TION TO CANDIDATE; APPLICATION OF IN10 DEXING TO CERTAIN OTHER LIMITS. 

11 (a) APPLICATION TO LIMITS ON CONTRIBUTIONS TO

12 NONPARTY POLITICAL COMMITTEES AND CONTRIBU13 TIONS BY MULTICANDIDATE POLITICAL COMMITTEES TO

14 CANDIDATES.—Section 315(c)(1) of the Federal Election 

15 Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a(c)(1)) is amend16 ed— 

17 (1) in subparagraph (B)(i), by inserting 

18 ‘‘(a)(1)(C), (a)(2)(A),’’ after ‘‘(a)(1)(B),’’; and 

19 (2) in subparagraph (C), by inserting 

20 ‘‘(a)(1)(C), (a)(2)(A),’’ after ‘‘(a)(1)(B),’’. 

21 (b) TIMING OF INDEXING.— 

22 (1) DELAY IN INDEXING FOR CERTAIN LIM23 ITS.—Section 315(c)(1)(B) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 

24 441a(c)(1)(B)) is amended by striking ‘‘2002’’ and 

25 inserting ‘‘2002 (or, in the case of the limitation es-
3 

•HR 4664 IH 

1 tablished by subsections (a)(1)(A), (a)(1)(C), or 

2 (a)(2)(A), 2008)’’. 

3 (2) DETERMINATION OF BASE PERIOD.—Sec4 tion 315(c)(2)(B) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 

5 441a(c)(2)(B)) is amended— 

6 (A) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

7 end; 

8 (B) in clause (ii)— 

9 (i) by striking ‘‘(a)(1)(A),’’, and 

10 (ii) by striking the period at the end 

11 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

12 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

13 clause: 

14 ‘‘(iii) for purposes of subsections (a)(1)(A), 

15 (a)(1)(C), and (a)(2)(A), calendar year 2007.’’. 

16 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

17 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with 

18 respect to elections for Federal office occurring after De19 cember 2006. 

Æ