alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016050EN.01000501.xml

| 10.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 50/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 50/5

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 50/04)

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Routes concerned | Reggio Calabria - Bologna and vice versa
  Reggio Calabria - Pisa and vice versa |
| New date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 30 October 2016 |
| Address where the text and any information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | Reference document


  OJ C 301, 12 September 2015

  For further information, please contact:





  Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport |
| Directorate-General for Airports and Air Transport |
| Tel. 06 5908 4908/4041/4350 |
| Fax 06 5908 3280 |
| Email: segreteria_dgata@pec.mit.gov.it |
| Internet: http://www.mit.gov.it |

Member State

Italy

Routes concerned

Reggio Calabria - Bologna and vice versa

Reggio Calabria - Pisa and vice versa

New date of entry into force of the public service obligations

30 October 2016

Address where the text and any information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

Reference document

Reference document

OJ C 301, 12 September 2015

For further information, please contact:

Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport

Directorate-General for Airports and Air Transport

Tel. 06 5908 4908/4041/4350

Fax 06 5908 3280

Email: segreteria_dgata@pec.mit.gov.it

Internet: http://www.mit.gov.it

---
BEFORE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION OF 

AMERICA, INC. d/b/a AIRLINES FOR 

AMERICA, et al. 

Complainants, 

V. 

PORT OF PORTLAND, OREGON, 

Respondent. 

Docket No. 16-16-04 

MOTION OF THE PORT OF PORTLAND 

FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REBUTTAL 

Pursuant to 14 C.P.R. §§ 16.19 and 16.11(a), the Port of Portland ("Port"), the 

Respondent in the case, requests leave to file and hereby files this motion for an extension of 

time until Friday, June 24, 2016, in which to file a Rebuttal. 

In support of this motion, the Port states as follows: 

1. On May 25, 2016, the Complainants filed with FAA and served on the Port their 

Reply. In accordance with Part 16 procedural rules, a "respondent may file a rebuttal within 1 0 

days of the date of service of complainant's reply." 14 C.P.R. § 16.23(f). Thus, the procedural 

rules grant the Port until June 6, 2016 (June 4 is a Saturday), to submit a Rebuttal. 

2. The Port believes that an extension of time is both necessary and appropriate "for 

a fair and complete consideration of matters before the agency." 14 C.P.R. § 16.11(a). 
Complainants' Reply introduces into the administrative record more than 300 pages of new 

evidence and testimony that require careful review, consideration, and response. 

3. On Friday, May 27, 2016, the undersigned contacted Roy Goldberg, counsel for 

Complainants, who advised that Complainants do not oppose this request. 

Relief Requested 

For the foregoing reasons, the Port hereby requests an extension of time in which it may 

file a Rebuttal until Friday, June 24, 2016. 

May 27,2016 

Respectfully submitted, 

~QC1~~ Pablo 0. Niiesch ...__ ___ _ 

Spiegel & McDiarmid LLP 

1875 Eye St., N.W. 

Suite 700 

Washington, DC 20006 

Email: pablo.nuesch@spiegelmcd.com 

Phone: 202-879-4000 

Fax: 202-393-2866 

Attorney for the Port of Portland 

2 
Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that in accordance with 14 CFR § § 16.15 and 16.13(h), I have today, the 

2i11 day of May, 2016, caused the foregoing Motion for Extension ofTime to File Rebuttal to be 

served electronically, on the following: 

David Berg, Esq. 

Vice President & General Counsel 

Doug Mullen, Esq. 

Assistant General Counsel 

Air Transport Association of America, Inc. 

d/b/a Airlines for America 

1275 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Suite 1300 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

(202) 626-4234 

Email: dberg@airlines. org 

dmullen@airlines.org 

Counsel for Complainants 

Roy Goldberg, Esq. 

Steptoe & Johnson LLP 

1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

(202) 429-8028 

Email: rgoldberg@steptoe.com 

Pablo 0. Ni.iesch
BOARP: 	 BOARD: 

Paul C. Aughrry, III D H E C 	 Henry C. Scott 

Chairman 

Edwin H. Cooper, III 

Vice Chairman 

PROMOTE 

~-~ PROTECT PROSPER 

M. David Mitchell, MD 

Glenn A. McCall 

Steven G. Kisner 

Secretary C. Earl Hunter, Commissionet Coleman F. Buckhouse, MD 

Promoting andprotecting the health ofthe public and the t'nuironmem 

November 29,2010 

Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming 

Regional Administrator 

Director Superfund Division 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region 4 

61 Forsyth Street, SW 

Atlanta, GA 30303-3104 

Subject: 	 U.S. Finishing/Cone Mills Site 

SCD003358744 

Greenville County, South Carolina 

Dear Ms. Fleming: 

Pursuant to the November 2,2010 letter from Franklin E. Hill, Director, Superfund Division U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Region IV, to Daphne Neel, Bureau Chief, Bureau 

of Land and Waste Management, South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental 

Control (SCDHEC), SCDHEC concurs with USEPA moving forward with listing of the U.S. 

Finishing/Cone Mills site in Greenville County on the National Priorities List (NPL) of Federal 

Superfund Sites. 

It is the SCDHEC's belief that the current condition of the U.S. Finishing/Cone Mills site poses 

considerable threat to public health and the environment for the State of South Carolina. 

Numerous areas of contamination still exist at the site including surface impoundments, soil and 

subsurface soil contamination, a significant groundwater contaminant plume and contaminated 

sediments in Langston Creek and the Reedy River. Due to the nature in which the operating 

company left the site, other potential threats to human health and the environment remain at the 

site. According to USEP A, the site qualifies for proposal to the NPL based upon the score of the 

Hazard Ranking System (HRS) package completed for the site. Therefore, SCDHEC fully 

supports USEP A's efforts to proceed with the NPL listing process for this site. Further, 

SCDHEC encourages making appropriate areas of this site available for possible redevelopment 

as expeditiously as possible. 

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL 


2600 Bull Street· Columbia, SC 29201 • Phone: (803) 898-3432 • www.scdhec.gov 
Please also allow this letter to serve as my designation of G. Kendall Taylor, Director, Site 

Assessment, Remediation and Revitalization Division, SCDHEC, as South Carolina's official 

contact for the USEP A concurrence on the listing of this NPL site in our state, as well as any 

future corr pondence regarding e site. 

Robert W. King, Jr. 

Deputy Commissioner 

Environmental Quality Control 

South Carolina Department ofHealth and Environmental Control 

CC: 	 Franklin E. Hill, Superfund Division, USEPA, Region IV 

Daphne Neel, Bureau Chief, BL WM, SCDHEC 

G. Kendall Taylor, BL WM 


Susan Turner, Region 2 EQC 


Van Keisler, BLWM
No. 11-6918.

#### Nicholas Valdez, Petitioner v. Kevin Milyard, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 1119, 132 S. Ct. 1012,

181 L. Ed. 2d 749,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 192.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 434 Fed. Appx. 744.
Deep Dive into the SBIR/STTR Program webinar

Email this event to me @

Invalid Email Address!Invalid Email Address!

Start Date/Time:

Wednesday, August 14, 2024 1:30 PM

End Date/Time:

Wednesday, August 14, 2024 2:30 PM

Recurring Event:

One time event

Importance:

Normal Priority

Category:

Presentation

Location:

Virtual/Online

Description:

The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs are highly competitive programs that encourage domestic small businesses to engage in Federal Research/Research and Development (R/R&D) with the potential for commercialization. Through a competitive awards-based program, SBIR and STTR enable small businesses to explore their technological potential and provide the incentive to profit from its commercialization. By including qualified small businesses in the nation's R&D arena, high-tech innovation is stimulated, and the United States gains entrepreneurial spirit as it meets its specific research and development needs.

Central to the STTR program is the partnership between small businesses and nonprofit research institutions. The STTR program requires the small business to formally collaborate with a research institution in Phase I and Phase II. STTR's most important role is to bridge the gap between performance of basic science and commercialization of resulting innovations.

Registration in advance is required to participate at:

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJItdO6srT0rHyH-q0ezAHkU_R_9sra78G4

 

Enrolled Users:

Alandra Jones

                - Return
                - 
                - Export
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-2 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a
duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2017, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC,
Santander Consumer USA Inc., Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2017-2 and Wilmington Trust, National Association (the “Agreement”) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my
supervision.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period
that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.
| | ---------------------------
| |                            
| | By:                        
| | Name:                      
| | Title:                     
| | Date:                      
| |                            
| | By:                        
| | Name:                      
| | Title:                     
| | Date:
#### Estate of Johnson

2016 MT 274N

DA 16-0118

10/25/16

Affirmed

Dist. 1 (Lewis and Clark)
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40456 Summary Calendar

DAGOBERTO VARGAS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus RUBEN LONGORIA; MARI G. LOPEZ; ROLANDO GARCIA, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA-C-94-297

- - - - - - - - - - May 12, 1997 Before SMITH, DUHE’ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Dagoberto Vargas, Texas state prisoner # 429237, requests permission to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in the appeal of the denial of his pro se and in forma pauperis complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 9, 1997, Chief Judge Politz ordered Vargas to file an affidavit for leave to proceed IFP on appeal pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act ofNo. 96-40456 - 2 - 1995 (PLRA). The order held Vargas’ appeal in abeyance for 30 days pending payment of the $105 filing fee or submittal of the required documents pursuant to the PLRA. Vargas timely responded; however, the documentation submitted by Vargas does not comply with the requirements imposed by the PLRA because he did not submit information regarding his prison trust account for the required six-month period. See § 1915(a), (b). Accordingly, Vargas’ motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution. See 5th Cir. R. 42.3. Should Vargas wish to reinstate his appeal, he is instructed to pay the $105 filing fee to the clerk of the district court within 30 days from the date of this order.
MOTION DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED.
ULYSSES BERNARD
WOODFAULK

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 281 7

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 7, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Taylor County

. Gregory S. Parker

, Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Zachary F. Lawton, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lauren Brudnicki, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS

, C.J., MARSTILLER and OSTERHAUS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
#### Manning v. Canton Township Sanitary Authority

*James H. McCune,*for plaintiffs.

*Sanford S. Finder*and *William Allison,*for defendant.

January 5, 1989

RODGERS, *J.,*

Plaintiffs, Blair Manning and Patsy Manning, seek peremptory judgment in mandamus against defendant, Canton Township Sanitary Authority, to require defendant authority to satisfy its claim for delinquent sewer rentals entered at no. 94, December 1980, M.L.D. in *34the face amount of $342.03. Plaintiffs allege in their complaint that at the time they purchased the real estate against which this claim is entered, they reasonably relied on a written statement of the authority solicitor of the amount necessary to satisfy the outstanding liens of the sanitary authority and payment was made at closing from the proceeds of the sale by the sellers to the Canton Township Sanitary Authority as represented by the authority solicitor.

However, the authority takes the position in its answer that its then-solicitor’s letter, at that time, referred only to the liens for construction due the authority, and not for the amounts due for delinquent sewer rental.

At oral argument of the motion for peremptory mandamus, this court raised the issue of whether the authority, could be barred by the doctrine of equitable estoppel by reason of the alleged representations of its solicitor.

The general rule is that the doctrine of estoppel is applicable to the commonwealth or its political subdivisions only if it is acting in a proprietary capacity rather than a governmental capacity, 14 P.L.E. Estoppel §27 at 200.

To this general rule however, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has made an exception and has applied the doctrine of estoppel where an innocent person has reasonably relied on the representations of a public official. *Erie City v. Piece of Land,*308 Pa. 454, 162 Atl. 445 (1932). See also, *Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. 1010.61 Acres of Land,*146 F.2d 99, 102 (1944). See also, Hecht, Pennsylvania Municipal Claims and Tax Liens, §45.2 (1967). Accordingly this court finds that in an appropriate case equitable estoppel is a defense to payment of a municipal claim.

However, in the case at bar, defendant authority *35claims that its then-solicitor made no misrepresentation that could be reasonably relied upon, that his representation was only to liens owing for sewer line construction rather than rentals due for operation, and that plaintiffs were not innocent purchasers since the amounts paid were substantially different from the face amounts that had been entered of record at no. 157, June term, 1978, M.L.D. in the amount of $840 and at no. 94, December term, 1980, M.L.D. in the face amount of $342.03.

Accordingly the motion for peremptory judgment of mandamus by plaintiffs cannot be granted at this time.

ORDER OF COURT

And now, January 5,1989, the motion of plaintiffs for peremptory judgment in this matter is refused without prejudice.
Date: 1 September 2022 *****************************

NSN: 8940-01-571-0178 (WSD) * MONOGRAPH: MCW/LRP 11 

 *****************************

Item: Western style scrambled eggs with uncured ham, cheese, peppers and onions, Cooked, 

Dehydrated

Document: PCR-E-001, Eggs, Scrambled, Cooked, Dehydrated, Packaged in a Stand Up Pouch, 

Shelf Stable (Type II)

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 400 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Dehydrated product: Light to medium yellow colored scrambled egg pieces, pinkishbeige ham dices, green and red bell pepper pieces, off-white onion pieces.

Rehydrated product: Light to medium yellow colored scrambled egg pieces, pinkishbeige ham dices, green and red colored bell pepper pieces, translucent white to offwhite onion pieces.

Odor:

Dehydrated product: Slight smoked egg.

Rehydrated product: Cooked, moderate smoked egg, ham, bell pepper and a mild 

cheddar cheese and onion.

Flavor: Rehydrated product: Cooked, moderate smoked egg, ham, bell pepper and a mild 

cheddar cheese and onion.

Texture:

Dehydrated product: No wet or soft spots indicating incomplete dehydration.

Rehydrated product: Fully rehydrated within twelve minutes, moist and tender eggs

and may be slightly spongy, moist, and tender ham dices, soft and tender bell pepper,

and onion pieces.

Possible Deteriorative Changes

Appearance: Dehydrated and Rehydrated: Darkening or loss of color of egg, ham, peppers, and 

onion. 

Odor: Dehydrated and Rehydrated: Sulfur, loss of smoked egg, rancid, cardboard. 

Flavor: Dehydrated and Rehydrated: Sulfur, bland, bitter, grassy, rancid, oxidized.

Texture:

Dehydrated: Very hard, tacky egg, ham, peppers, and onions. 

Rehydrated: Unrehydrated product, hardening of egg, ham, peppers, or onions;

excessive syneresis.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

N/A

Special Notes

N/A
No. 11-5474.

#### Moustapha Magassouba, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1186, 132 S. Ct. 1165,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 914.

181 L. Ed. 2d 1034,

January 23, 2012.

Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied. Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

Former decision, 565 U.S. 935, 132 S. Ct. 386, 181 L. Ed. 2d 243, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6260.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 8527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-3969]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER05-1410-012; EL05-148-012; Docket No. ER09-412-001]


PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.; PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.; Notice 
Deferring Technical Conference

February 18, 2009.
    In PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 124 FERC ] 61,272, at P 53 (2008), 
the Commission indicated that it expected to hold a technical 
conference in this proceeding in February 2009. The date of that 
conference is hereby deferred pending further notice.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-3969 Filed 2-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<PAGE>



         AMENDMENT No. 7, dated as of September 18, 2000, to WARRANT AGREEMENT
dated as of September 15, 1998, as previously amended by Amendment No. 1 dated
as of December 18, 1998, Amendment No. 2 dated as of August 30, 1999, Amendment
No. 3 dated as of September 15, 1999, Amendment No. 4 dated as of July 27, 2000,
Amendment No. 5 dated as of August 15, 2000 and Amendment No. 6 dated as of
September 15, 2000 (as amended, the "Original Agreement") between Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation formerly known as Insignia/ESG
Holdings, Inc. (the "Corporation"), and APTS V, L.L.C., a Delaware limited
liability company ("APTS"), providing for the issuance of warrants to purchase
51,944 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Corporation.

         WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain letter agreement dated the date
hereof, the Corporation and APTS desire to extend the Expiration Date (as
defined in the Original Agreement) of the Warrants provided for in the Original
Agreement;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

         1.   Terms used herein shall have the meanings set forth in the
Original Agreement, unless otherwise defined herein.

         2.   The Expiration Date of the Warrants is hereby extended from
September 18, 2000 to August 1, 2001.

         3.   Except as set forth in this Amendment No. 7, the Original
Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects.

         4.   Any Warrant Certificate evidencing Warrants need not be amended to
reflect the change in Expiration Date provided for herein in order to give full
effect to such change.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 7
to the Original Agreement to be duly executed and delivered by their proper and
duly authorized officers, as of the date and year first above written.

                                INSIGNIA FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

                                By:-------------------------------------------
                                   Name:  Adam B. Gilbert
                                   Title: Executive Vice President

                                APTS V, L.L.C.
                                By:  APTS Partners, L.P., the managing member
                                By:  APTS GP Partners, L.P., its general partner
                                By:  APTS Acquisition Corporation, its general
                                         partner

                                By:-------------------------------------------
                                   Name:  John R. S. Jacobsson
                                   Title: Vice President