alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . Copies of agreements are available through the Commission's Web site (                    *http://www.fmc.gov*) or contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov*.                

*Agreement No.:*                     011961-005.                

*Title:*                     The Maritime Credit Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     Alianca Navegacao e Logistica Ltda. & Cia; A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S; China Shipping Container Lines Co., Ltd.; CMA CGM, S.A.; Companhia Libra de Navegacao; Compania Libra de Navegacion Uruguay S.A.; Compania Sudamericana de Vapores, S.A.; COSCO Container Lines Company Limited; Dole Ocean Cargo Express; Hamburg-Süd; Hoegh Autoliners A/S; Independent Container Line Ltd.; Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.; Norasia Container Lines Limited; Safmarine Container Lines N.V.; Tropical Shipping & Construction Co., Ltd.; United Arab Shipping Company (S.A.G.); Wallenius Wilhelmsen Logistics AS; and Zim Integrated Shipping Services, Ltd.                

*Filing Party:*                     Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M Street, NW.; Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036.                

*Synopsis:*                     The amendment would add Nippon Yusen Kaisha as a party to the agreement. The parties have requested expedited review of this amendment.                

By order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Karen V. Gregory,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-425 Filed 1-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001063761
<NAME> SIMON PROPERTY GROUP INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          78,971
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  215,703
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F2>
<PP&E>                                      11,646,393
<DEPRECIATION>                                 634,277
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,013,550
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F2>
<BONDS>                                      7,744,926
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    717,916
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,623,159
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,013,550<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               932,969
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  504,915
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,598
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             281,749
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                141,509
<INCOME-TAX>                                   141,509
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            141,509
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  7,002
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   102,655
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.72
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are stated net of allowances.
<F2>The Company does not report using a classified balance sheet.
<F3>Includes limited partner's interest in the Operating Partnership of $990,445,
and preferred stock of subsidiary of $339,262.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Date: 2 April 2020 *********************

NSN: 8925-01-525-3597 (ASF) MONOGRAPH: M10T

 ********************* 

Item: Almonds (unblanched), Flavored (smoke), Conventional (Type VI, Style C, Agricultural 

practices (1))

Document: CID A-A-20164, Nuts, Shelled, Roasted and PKG & QAP

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 137 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Whole almond. Cinnamon-brown skin intact with an evenly distributed coating of fine 

seasoning dust. Not excessively coated with oil.

Odor: Fresh roasted with a distinct smoke odor.

Flavor: Fresh roasted with a distinct smoke flavor.

Texture: Firm crisp bite and chew with a fresh nut texture. Not excessively hard.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Some slight darkening or evidence of burned nuts. Excessive coating of oil or caking of 

seasoning dust.

Odor: Rancid, stale, some loss of smoke.

Flavor: Rancid, stale, some loss of smoke.

Texture: Soft, not crisp or excessively hard.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

This product is vacuum packaged. Inspect for “inadequate vacuum” by firmly grasping the edges of the 

package and attempting to pull or stretch the material away from the product for a short time. A pouch 

with adequate vacuum will return to its original shape when pressure is released. If vacuum is adequate 

the product will not move easily within the pouch.

Special Notes

Serviceability is considered significantly affected when more than 10.0 percent by weight of almonds

consist of splits or if more than 4.0 percent by weight appear broken into pieces 1/4 or less of the kernel. 1/

1/ A split is defined as the separated half of the kernel
MPD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0138

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM CURTIS SMALL,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including May 6, 2022, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response 

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

April 5 2022

04/05/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0138
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)/15d -14(a),
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Michael D. Lohner, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Home Interiors & Gifts, Inc. (the
Registrant);2.
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report;4.
    The Registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and
15d-15e) for the Registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls or
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based
on such evaluation;c)
    Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The Registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 13, 2005/s/ MICHAEL D. LOHNERMichael D. LohnerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>



     AMENDMENT No. 5, dated as of September 18, 2000, to WARRANT AGREEMENT dated
as of September 15, 1998, as previously amended by Amendment No. 1 dated as of
September 15, 1999, Amendment No. 2 dated as of July 27, 2000, Amendment No. 3
dated as of August 15, 2000 and Amendment No. 4 dated as of September 15, 2000
(as amended, the "Original Agreement") between Insignia Financial Group, Inc., a
Delaware corporation formerly known as Insignia/ESG Holdings, Inc. (the
"Corporation"), and APTS Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
("APTS"), providing for the issuance of warrants to purchase 266,667 shares of
common stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Corporation.

     WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain letter agreement dated the date hereof,
the Corporation and APTS desire to extend the Expiration Date (as defined in the
Original Agreement) of the Warrants provided for in the Original Agreement;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

     1.    Terms used herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Original
Agreement, unless otherwise defined herein.

     2.    The Expiration Date of the Warrants is hereby extended from September
18, 2000 to August 1, 2001.

     3.    Except as set forth in this Amendment No. 5, the Original Agreement
is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects.

     4.    Any Warrant Certificate evidencing Warrants need not be amended to
reflect the change in Expiration Date provided for herein in order to give full
effect to such change.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 5
to the Original Agreement to be duly executed and delivered by their proper and
duly authorized officers, as of the date and year first above written.

                            INSIGNIA FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

                            By:---------------------------------------
                               Name:  Adam B. Gilbert
                               Title: Executive Vice President

                            APTS PARTNERS, L.P.

                            By:  APTS GP Partners, L.P., its general partner

                            By:  APTS Acquisition Corporation, its general
                                      partner

                            By:----------------------------------------
                               Name:  John R. S. Jacobsson
                               Title: Vice President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-2015

EDWARD S. POLLACK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, a government

agency,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CA-02-2195-2-23)

Submitted: October 24, 2002 Decided: October 30, 2002

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward S. Pollack, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Edward Pollack appeals the district court’s order accepting

the magistrate judge’s recommendation dismissing without prejudice

his civil action against the Federal Bureau of Investigation. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Pollack v.

FBI, No. CA-02-2195-2-23 (D.S.C. Aug. 19, 2002). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
COVID-19 vaccines are free for everyone living or working in 

the U.S. regardless of immigration or health insurance status.

CS 324333-A 05/27/2021

Get a COVID-19 vaccine as soon as you can.

Encourage your family and friends to get their vaccinations too. 

cdc.gov/coronavirus

Together we can stop

the pandemic.

Find a COVID-19 vaccine near you: www.vaccines.gov

COVID-19 vaccines are for everyone

Providing an ID is not a requirement for 

a person to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. 

Providers can ask for ID, but cannot turn 

people away if they don’t provide ID.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 38830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19276]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1224-DR]


Massachusetts; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
Commonwealth of Massachusetts (FEMA-1224-DR), dated June 23, 1998, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 6, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective July 6, 1998.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-19276 Filed 7-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
NO. 07-09 -031 7-CV IN THE CO URT OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL D NO VEM BER13, 2009

_________

_________

_________

___ C . B. A N D J . M ., L TD ., A PP EL LA N TS

V. CO YL. BARTZ, I ND IVID UA LLY AN D AS I ND EPEN DE NT EX EC UTOR OF THE ESTATE OF ALETA B. D OW ELL, DE CE ASED AN D AS TR US TEE OF THE ALETA BA RTZD OW ELL FAM ILY TRU ST, APP ELLEES

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 25 1 STDIS T RI CTCOU RTOF RA NDA L L COU NTY; NO . 58, 654- C; H ON ORABLE AN A ES TEVEZ, JU DG E

_________

_________

_________

____ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRT LE, JJ. ME MO RA ND UM OPI NI ON App ellant s C.B. and J.M., Ltd. h ave f iled a mo tion to dism iss th e app eal. T he co urt has is sued no opi nio n. Therefore, t he moti on i s gra nted, and the a ppeal i s d is mis sed. Tex . R. App . P . 4 2 . 1 ( a ) ( 1 ) . T h e m o t i o n d o e s n o ti n d i c a t e a n a g re e me n to f t h e p a rt ies re g ardin g the dis tr ibu ti on of cos ts of the appe al. C osts o f the appea l are therefore t axed ag ain st appel lan ts. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d ). N o moti on for re hear ing w il l be ent ertai ned and our mandatew il l is sue forthw it h. Jam es T . Camp bell Justice
No. D-2617.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Joseph John Hanna, Jr.

565 U.S. 1107, 132 S. Ct. 1086,

181 L. Ed. 2d 804,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 558.

January 9, 2012.

Joseph John Hanna, Jr., of Portland, Oregon, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
No. 11-5954.

#### Cheryl J. Latos, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

565 U.S. 1055, 132 S. Ct. 796,

181 L. Ed. 2d 478,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8548.

November 28, 2011.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
29 April 2014 **************************

NSN: 8940-01-615-1831 (BGMP) * MONOGRAPH NO: 1C1A

 ************************** 

Item: Brown gravy with meatballs and pasta

Document: PCR-B-058, Brown Gravy with Meatballs and Pasta, Packaged in a Polymeric Tray, 

Shelf Stable

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 514 Component Classification: Primary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

A blend of meatballs and mafalda noodles in brown gravy.

Gravy: Medium brown color that’s moderately thick and glossy. May contain visible 

flecks of spices.

Meatballs: Medium brown color and uniform in shape.

Pasta: Broad and flat noodles with ruffled edges. Cooked pasta color but may have a 

brown color from absorbed sauce.

Odor:

Cooked beef in gravy.

Gravy: Cooked beef.

Pasta: Cooked pasta.

Flavor:

Cooked beef in gravy.

Gravy: Cooked beef and mild mushroom.

Pasta: Cooked pasta.

Texture:

Gravy: Smooth and moderately thick.

Meatballs: Moist, moderately firm, not mushy.

Pasta: Slightly soft to slightly firm, not mushy or pasty.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance:

Gravy: May show evidence of oil separation, excessively thick or thin gravy.

Meatballs: May darken.

Pasta: Soft, mushy or pasty.

Odor:

Gravy: Metallic odor.

Meatballs: Metallic odor.

Pasta: Musty or other objectionable odors.

Flavor:

Gravy: Rancid, oxidized or metallic.

Meatballs: Rancid, oxidized or metallic.

Pasta: Scorched.

Texture:

Gravy: May show evidence of oil separation, excessively thick or thin gravy.

Meatballs: May become soft, mushy.

Pasta: Too soft, mushy or excessive breaking and cracking of product.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA

Special Notes

NA
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Metallurg Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(a),
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 ("Form
10-Q"), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


Date: November 10, 2003


                                             /s/ Arthur R. Spector
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Arthur R. Spector
                                        Principal Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 19, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-31132

Conference Calendar

 

VINCENT MARK CASTILLO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MELISSA HEBERT, Parole Officer; MICHAEL MCNULTY, Judge; 

JOE ROBERTS, Assistant District Attorney; HARRY LEE;

UNIDENTIFIED PARTIES,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-CV-792

--------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Vincent Mark Castillo, proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis, appeals the dismissal with prejudice of his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 complaint. 

Castillo does not challenge the district court’s reasons for

dismissing his claims against the various defendants related to

the probation revocation proceedings. See Brinkmann v. Dallas

County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). 

He merely reiterates his assertion that he was never actually on
No. 02-31132

-2-

** Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). 

probation and that the revocation proceeding was thus unlawful. 

Thus, Castillo has abandoned any challenge to the district

court’s reasons for dismissing his claims concerning the

probation revocation proceeding. See id. 

Liberally construed, Castillo’s brief contains an assertion

that the district court erred in dismissing his claims with

prejudice after he sought leave to withdraw them until such time

as the Heck** conditions were met. Castillo has not shown that

the district court erred in dismissing his claims with prejudice. 

Boyd v. Biggers, 31 F.3d 279, 282-84 (5th Cir. 1994). 

To the extent that Castillo seeks habeas corpus relief with

respect to his probation revocation proceeding, this appeal from

the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint is not the proper

forum within which to seek such relief. Castillo’s appeal is

without arguable merit and is frivolous. See Howard v. King,

707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is

frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

 Castillo is cautioned that future frivolous appeals filed

by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. 

He is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure

that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. 

 APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.