alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 2082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-403]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, January 26, 2009, 2 p.m. to 
January 26, 2009, 4 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge 
Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the Federal Register 
on December 31, 2008, 73 FR 80417-80418.
    The meeting has been changed to an AED meeting starting January 26, 
2009, 8 a.m. to January 27, 2009, 5 p.m. The meeting title has been 
changed to ``Coagulation and Thrombosis''. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: January 6, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-403 Filed 1-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
No. 11-7742.

#### Jose Arnaut, Petitioner v. Massachusetts.

565 U.S. 1168, 132 S. Ct. 1119,

181 L. Ed. 2d 999,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 687.

January 17, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.

Same case below, 78 Mass. App. 906, 940 N.E.2d 1232.
ID Descriptor L* a* b* c h dL* da* db* dEcmc*

Standard 10164 STANDARD 14.35 0.21 -1.90

Tolerance

1 1 THIN BLUE 

LIMIT 15.12 0.17 -2.39 0.77 -0.04 -0.49 0.92

2 2 RED-YELLOW 

LIMIT 14.69 0.38 -1.50 0.34 0.17 0.40 0.66

3 3 GREEN LIMIT 14.92 -0.08 -1.77 0.57 -0.29 0.13 0.71

4 4 YELLOW LIMIT 14.92 0.17 -1.51 0.57 -0.04 0.39 0.76

5 5 FULL YELLOW 

LIMIT 15.12 0.09 -1.52 0.77 -0.12 0.38 0.92

6

7

8

9

COMMENTS: NUMBERS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY 

Equipment Type HUNTER ULTRA SCAN PRO Setting Mode: Specular Included - Reflectance

UV Filter – OUT UV Lamp OFF

Shade Number BLUE 3346 Piece/Roll Number 10164

DLA/NAVY SHADE TOLERANCE PROJECT July 27, 2018

Fabric Nomenclature CLOTH, SERGE, WOOL MIL-DTL-823
No. 11-312.

#### Gailon A. Joy and Robert Pickle, Petitioners v. Three Angels Broadcasting Network, Inc., et al.

565 U.S. 1035, 132 S. Ct. 580,

181 L. Ed. 2d 422,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8227.

November 14, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
DENT 

Table IV, Defect No. 208 – Upper limit of a minor defect. A body 

dent forcing the end seam inward to such an extent that the 

counter sink (channel next to end seam) is involved, but no sharp 

ridges are evident.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

March 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129760 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

MARK C. NALEPKA and KIMBERLY P. Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, NALEPKA, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 129760 

 COA: 262000 
 Wayne CC: 03-340600-CK

JAMES HNATIO and WALDA HNATIO, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 15, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0320 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 27, 2006 

Clerk
O rder filed August 1 , 2019



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

_____ __ ____

No. 11

- 1 9

- 00 12 9

- CR

_______ _ ___

CHRISTINA MARIE HAYNES , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 29th District Court

Palo Pinto County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1 6011

O R D E R

Christina Marie Haynes entered an open plea of guilty to the offense of assault

on a public servant. The trial court assessed Haynes’s punishment at confinement

for five years and a fine of $2,000. Haynes ’s court

- appointed attorney on appeal has

filed in this court a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed by counsel

but is not signed by Haynes. We abate th e appeal.In or der for the motion to dismiss to comply with Rule 42.2 (a) of the Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure, the motion must be signed by both counsel and

Haynes. Counsel is well aware of this requirement and has informed this court as

follows by a letter dated J uly 12, 2019:

It has been made aware to me by my client that she no longer wishes to pursue her appeal in this matter. She has also indicated that she wishes for the appeal to be dismissed. . . .

Additionally, Ms. Haynes has been sent a copy of the motio n to dismiss. As of this date I have yet to receive a copy back with her signature. . . .

I was never able to get Ms. Haynes to sign her Certificate of Appeal and return it to me o r the Court in the beginning of this appeal.

. . .

T his appeal has be come unduly stalled due to Haynes’s failure to sign and

return the T rial C ourt’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal and , if she

desires to dismiss this appeal, the lack of Haynes’s signature on the motion to dismiss

that was filed by appellate counsel . Accordingly, w e remand the cause to the trial

court so that i t may determine w hether Haynes desires to prosecute the appeal in this

cause

.

The trial court is directed to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law , if

necessary, and to make any appropriate recommendations to this court

. The clerk of

the trial court is directed to prepare and forward to this court a clerk ’ s record

containing any findings, recommendations, or orders of the trial court. T he court

reporter is directed to prepare and forward to this court the reporter ’ s record from

the hearing. The records are due to be filed in this court on or before September 5

,

2019

.The appeal is abated.

PER CURIAM

August 1 , 2019

Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J. 1

Willson, J., not participating.

1 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Ea stland, sitting by assignment.
APP A 

DPSCH 4155.2 

************************** 

* M ONOG R A PH NO.: M 7I

***************************

I T E M : Beverage Base, Powder, Lemonade, Sugar Free, W / Aspartame (APM)

Sweetener, w / Added Ascorbic Acid. 

 (SFL) 

NSN: 8960-01-527-8377 I T EM SPE C IFICAT I ON: CID A-A-20098 

APPR OX IMAT E C AL OR I C V AL UE S: 1-2 Kilocalories (Ancillary)

CHAR ACT E R IST ICS OF IT EM:

APPEARANCE : Dehydrated; homogenous mixture of light yellow, fine powder,

free flowing. Rehydrated; cloudy, yellowish liquid.

ODOR: Tangy, lemon aroma.

FLAVOR: Lemon, sweet / sour

TEXTURE: Free flowing, fine powder; lumps that occur can be broken apart by

light, finger pressure.

DE FECTS L IK E L Y TO OCCUR :

APPEARANCE: Dehydrated; lumpy or caked, not free flowing. Rehydrated;

coagulated, excessive sediment significantly affecting aesthetic,

appearance or flavor.

ODOR: Burnt or scorched.

FLAVOR: Oxidized or any other flavor not typical of the type of beverage.

UNIQUE E X AM INAT ION / T E ST PR OC E DUR E : Prepare beverage in accordance with

package instructions. Product should dissolve completely within approximately two minutes. 

SPE CIAL NOT E S: In the rehydrated product, if slight sedimentation is observed but the odor and 

flavor are normal, do not score the sedimentation as a defect during surveillance inspection; make 

note of it in the narrative for future use. Coagulation may occur if the product has had temperature 

abuse. 

Coagulation results in clumps of granules that do not readily dissolve when product is reconstituted 

and tend to float in suspension.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 143 (Monday, July 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 40110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-19978]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Hanford 
Site

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Meeting cancellation notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act Pub. L. No. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770), a notice is hereby given of the 
cancellation of the open Environmental Management Site-Specific 
Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Hanford Site meeting, which was scheduled to 
be held on Thursday, August 6, 1998, from 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., and 
Friday, August 7, 1998, from 8:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m., at the Ridpath Hotel, 
W. 515 Sprague, Spokane, Washington has been canceled. This meeting was 
announced in the Federal Register on Thursday, July 2, 1998 (63 FR 
36216).

    Issued at Washington, DC, on July 21, 1998.
Althea T. Vanzego,
Acting Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-19978 Filed 7-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 150 (Wednesday, August 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 41854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20929]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than September 1, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Premier Bancshares, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Frederica Bank & Trust, St. Simon, 
Georgia.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 31, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-20929 Filed 8-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
```
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
  PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Bruce T. Leitch, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
  Financial Officer of NorPac Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”),
  hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”) fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    
|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                  
|    

|By:    | /s/ Bruce T. Leitch              
|------ | ---------------------------------
|Name:  | BRUCE T. LEITCH                  
|       |                                  
|Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief
|       | Financial Officer                
|Date:  | December 17, 2004                

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 148 (Monday, August 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41250-41251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20724]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Sunshine Act Meeting

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: July 27, 1998, 63 
FR 40116.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: July 29, 1998, 10:00 
a.m.


[[Page 41251]]


CHANGE IN THE MEETING: The following docket Numbers and Companies have 
been added on the Agenda scheduled for the July 29, 1998 meeting.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Item No.                      Docket No. and company   
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAG-44....................................  RP96-173-000, et al.,       
                                             Williams Gas Pipelines     
CAG-54....................................  RP89-183-081, Williams Gas  
                                             Pipelines Central, Inc.    
------------------------------------------------------------------------

David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20724 Filed 7-30-98; 10:52 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2203

ROBERT THOMAS PAYNE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

MICHELLE K. LEE, Deputy Under Secretary for Intellectual 

Property and Deputy Director, United States Patent and 

Trademark Office,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior

District Judge. (1:14-cv-01077-TSE-MSN)

Submitted: April 29, 2016 Decided: May 4, 2016

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Thomas Payne, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, 

Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Thomas Payne seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing his discrimination action without prejudice.

We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the 

notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, 

the notice of appeal must be filed no more than 60 days after 

the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. 

R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on 

August 3, 2015. The notice of appeal was filed on October 6, 

2015. Because Payne failed to file a timely notice of appeal or 

to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3399 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2020 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT 

To amend the Nutria Eradication and Control Act of 2003 

to include California in the program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3399 RFS

1 SECTION 1. NUTRIA ERADICATION. 

2 The Nutria Eradication and Control Act of 2003 

3 (Public Law 108–16) is amended— 

4 (1) in section 2— 

5 (A) in subsection (a)— 

6 (i) in paragraph (1), by striking 

7 ‘‘Wetlands and tidal marshes of the Chesa8 peake Bay and in Louisiana’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘Wetlands, tidal marshes, and agricultural 

10 lands’’; 

11 (ii) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘in 

12 Maryland and Louisiana’’; and 

13 (iii) by amending paragraph (3) to 

14 read as follows: 

15 ‘‘(3) Traditional harvest methods to control or 

16 eradicate nutria have failed. Consequently, marsh 

17 loss, loss of public and private wetlands, and loss of 

18 agricultural lands are accelerating.’’; and 

19 (B) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘the 

20 State of Maryland and the State of Louisiana’’ 

21 and inserting ‘‘any State that has demonstrated 

22 the need’’; and 

23 (2) in section 3— 

24 (A) by amending subsection (a) to read as 

25 follows: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3399 RFS

1 ‘‘(a) GRANT AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of the Inte2 rior (referred to in this Act as the ‘Secretary’), may pro3 vide financial assistance to a State, in an amount that is 

4 in proportion to the total impacted area of such State af5 fected by nutria, that has demonstrated to the Secretary 

6 sufficient need for a program to implement measures to 

7 eradicate or control nutria and restore marshland, public 

8 and private wetlands, and agricultural lands damaged by 

9 nutria.’’; 

10 (B) by striking subsection (b); 

11 (C) in subsection (d)— 

12 (i) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘the 

13 program may’’ and inserting ‘‘a State pro14 gram referred to in subsection (a) may’’; 

15 and 

16 (ii) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘the 

17 program may’’ and inserting ‘‘a State pro18 gram referred to in subsection (a) may’’; 

19 (D) in subsection (e), by inserting ‘‘to a 

20 State’’ after ‘‘provided’’; 

21 (E) in subsection (f), by striking 

22 ‘‘$4,000,000’’ and all that follows and inserting 

23 ‘‘$12,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 

24 through 2025.’’; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 3399 RFS

1 (F) by redesignating subsections (c) 

2 through (f) as subsections (b) through (e). 

Passed the House of Representatives February 26, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
30 August 2006 

NSN: 8940-01-545-4861 MONOGRAPH NO: M2B14

Item: Meatballs in Marinara Sauce (MMS) 

Document: PCR-M-015, Meatballs in Marinara Sauce, Packaged in a Flexible Pouch, Shelf 

Stable 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 250 Component Classification: Primary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F 

Item Characteristics

Appearance: 

Small, rounded, symmetrical meatballs with a cooked ground beef appearance and 

varied size in a smooth, opaque red to reddish brown sauce containing small pieces of 

tomato, onion, and flecks of herbs. 

Odor: Cooked tomato, onion, and ground beef with Italian herbs and spices. 

Flavor: Cooked tomato, onion, and ground beef with Italian herbs and spices. 

Texture: Moist and tender meatballs in a moderately thick sauce. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: Darkened sauce and darkened browned meatballs. The surface of the meatballs may be 

especially browned. Some syneresis and/or thickened sauce. Moderate oiling-off. 

Odor: Burnt sauce; some loss of characteristic herb and spice aroma. 

Flavor: Rancid meat. Sour, bitter, burnt sauce; some loss of characteristic herb and spice 

flavor. 

Texture: Some syneresis or thickening of sauce. Meatballs extremely dry, hard, mushy or 

rubbery. Moderate oiling-off. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

There may be some variation in the amount and size of tomato pieces depending on the manufacturer.