alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

 ************************ 

 MONOGRAPH No. BB5 

 ************************ 

ITEM: Cocoa Beverage Powder, Type 1, Sugar Sweetened, Style B, Without Marshmallows, 

Flavor A, Milk Chocolate 

SPECIFICATION: CID A-A-20189A 

APPROXIMATE CALORIC VALUE PER SERVING: 192 

COMPONENT CLASSIFICATION: Secondary 

 

CHARACTERISTICS OF ITEM: 

APPEARANCE: Dehydrated: Fine powder, milk cocoa colored, without lumps (see Special 

Notes). 

Reconstituted: Milk chocolate colored fluid, good body, well blended, 

uniform consistency. 

ODOR: Sweet milk chocolate, slight coffee creamer. 

FLAVOR: Sweet milk chocolate. 

TEXTURE: Dehydrated: Loose, dry, powdery, free flowing and without lumps (see 

Special Notes). 

Reconstituted: Good body, full rich mouthfeel. 

ESTIMATED SHELF-LIFE AT: 70 DEGREES F: 66 months 

80 DEGREES F: 54 months 

90 DEGREES F: 42 months 

100 DEGREES F: 30 months 

 

EXPECTED DETERIORATIVE CHANGES: 

APPEARANCE: Caking, lumpiness, dark specs, darkened areas (see Special Notes), overall color 

tends to fade. 

ODOR: Moderate loss of cocoa odor. 

FLAVOR: Cooked milk, moderate loss of cocoa flavor. 

TEXTURE: Dehydrated: Caked, lumpy (see Special Notes). 

Reconstituted: Particles should disperse readily in hot or cold water. 

Monograph BB5, Page 1 of 2 Pages 
App J 

DSCPH 4155.2 

UNIQUE EXAMINATION/TEST PROCEDURES: Initial examination should be done in the dry 

state. Final examination and evaluation should be done after reconstituting IAW package 

instructions. Even if product is caked, it should be reconstituted to determine the effect, if any, the 

caking has on the beverage. 

SPECIAL NOTES: Product may contain lumps which are of no concern provided they break or fall 

apart under light finger pressure. Dark brown specs appear and become larger masses as moisture 

is absorbed in the product. Product is packed in package which is designed to yield approximately 

8 ounces when rehydrated. 

Monograph BB5, Page 2 of 2 Pages
No. 11-7494.

#### Kenneth E. Fink, Petitioner v. Perry Phelps, Warden, et al.

565 U.S. 1133, 132 S. Ct. 1055,

181 L. Ed. 2d 774,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 235.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 448 Fed. Appx. 258.
No. 11-787.

#### Earnest Hicks, et al., Petitioners v. Dairyland Insurance Company, et al.

565 U.S. 1179, 132 S. Ct. 1155,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1020,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1044.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 441 Fed. Appx. 463.
No. 11-6980.

#### Oscar Hernandez, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1070, 132 S. Ct. 786,

181 L. Ed. 2d 502,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8332.

November 28, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 440 Fed. Appx. 159.
29 November 2018 **************************

NSN: 8915-01-224-6145 (PSDD) *MONOGRAPH NO: M5G*

 ***************************

Item: Pears, sweetened, diced (Type IV)

Document: PCR-F-002D

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 100 Component Classification: Secondary

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F

Item Characteristics

Appearance:

Discernible pale yellow to light beige colored dices that are practically free of mushy 

pears, seeds, stem and core material.

Syrup or fruit juices shall be thin and translucent.

Odor: Slight to moderate sweet cooked pear.

Flavor: Slight to moderate sweet cooked pear.

Texture: Tender to slightly firm and shall not be mushy.

Syrup or fruit juices thin and free flowing.

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance:

Extreme darkening. Indistinct dices or excessive mushy pears.

Syrup or fruit juices thick and opaque.

Odor: Fermented, sour, musty.

Flavor: Musty, old, overly tart or sour, bitter, caramelized, fermented. 

Texture: Excessively soft or mushy. Syrup or fruit juice thick or starchy and not free flowing.

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

Special Notes
**
Exhibit 31.1 

Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function 

of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)

**CERTIFICATION**

I, KevinJ. Cullum, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2017-B Owner Trust(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. I amresponsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association 

Date: June 27, 2019 

 
By: 
/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. Cullum
President and Chief Executive Officer of

Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation

(senior officer in charge ofthe servicing function)
**
**Exhibit 12.****2**

 

I, Joe Zhou, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Sogou Inc.; and

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date: April 23, 2020                  |         |
|--------------------------------------------|--------------|
|                                       |         |
| By:                                        | /s/ Joe Zhou |   |
| Name: Joe Zhou                             |         |
| Title:   Chief Financial Officer |         |
|                                            |              |  |

 

----
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3402 

To amend chapter 2 of title 1, United States Code, to establish the style 

for amending laws. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 21, 2019 

Mr. AMASH (for himself, Mr. MOONEY of West Virginia, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. 

MASSIE, Mr. LOUDERMILK, Mr. MOULTON, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. DAVIDSON

of Ohio, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. CLOUD, 

Mr. TONKO, Ms. NORTON, and Mr. HUFFMAN) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 2 of title 1, United States Code, to 

establish the style for amending laws. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Readable Legislation 

5 Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDING LAWS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 2 of title 1, United 

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing new section: 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3402 IH

1 ‘‘§ 115. Amending laws 

2 ‘‘No section of an Act shall be revised or amended 

3 by mere reference to it. Every bill or joint resolution which 

4 amends an existing section of any Act shall set forth the 

5 entire section, showing the omissions and insertions pro6 posed by appropriate typographical devices.’’. 

7 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec8 tions at the beginning of chapter 2 of title 1, United 

9 States Code, is amended by adding after the item relating 

10 to section 114 the following new item: 

‘‘115. Amending laws.’’. 

11 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

12 This Act and the amendments made by it shall take 

13 effect on January 1, 2020. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.8


 


Amendment No. 5 To Employment Agreement


 


Amendment No. 5, dated
as of December 5, 2011, by and between The Berkshire Bank, a New York banking corporation ("Employer"), and Moses Krausz
("Employee"), to the Agreement, dated as of May 1, 1999, between Employer and Employee (the "Employment Agreement").


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, Employer and
Employee entered into the Employment Agreement; and


 


WHEREAS, Employer and
Employee wish the amend the terms of the Employment Agreement with respect to the term thereof.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the covenants herein contained, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:


 


1.           Paragraph 3 of
the Employment Agreement shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:


 


		"3.	Term of Employment. The employment by Employer of
Employee pursuant hereto shall commence as of the date hereof and, subject to the provisions of paragraph 4 hereof, shall terminate
on April 30, 2013; provided, however, that Employee's employment hereunder shall be automatically renewed for up to three additional
periods of one year each unless Employee or Employer notifies the other, not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to
the expiration of Employee's then current employment period, that he or it elects not to extend Employee's employment hereunder
beyond the expiration date of the then current employment period."



 


2.          The increases in
Employee's base salary set forth in Section 2.1 of the Employment Agreement shall be applicable for the periods of employment May
1, 2011 to April 30, 2012 and May 1, 2012 to April 30, 2013, respectively, and, if the Employee's employment is extended beyond
April 30, 2013 as set forth in the amended Paragraph 3, for each year thereafter.


 


3.          Except as otherwise
amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect unamended from and after the date hereof.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
this Amendment No. 5 has been executed and delivered by the parties hereto as of the date first above written.


 


	 	THE BERKSHIRE BANK
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Moses Marx
	 	 	Moses Marx
	 	 	Chairman of the Board
	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Moses Krausz
	 	 	MOSES KRAUSZ
800 Independence Ave., S.W.

Washington, DC 20591

February 9, 2015

Mr. Matthew S. Bieschke

President

UAS America Fund, LLC

2020 K Street, N.W., Suite 520

Washington, DC 20006

Mr. Brendan M. Schulman

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

1177 Avenue of The Americas

New York, NY 10036

Dear Messrs. Bieschke and Schulman:

Thank you for your December 18, 2014 letter to the public docket (Docket No. FAA2014-1087) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to initiate rulemaking 

to propose regulations to implement operating requirements for small unmanned aircraft 

systems.

The FAA has initiated a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on this matter, 

“Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems” (RIN 2120-AJ60). 

You can check the status of that rule by visiting www.dot.gov/regulations. Once the rule 

has been published in the Federal Register (www.federalregister.gov), it will be open for 

public comment. 

Because the FAA was already in the process of rulemaking at the time this petition was 

filed, pursuant to 14 CFR 11.73(c), the FAA will not treat this petition as a separate 

action, but rather, will consider it as a comment on this rulemaking. The FAA will place a 

copy of your petition and this response in the docket for this rulemaking and will invite 

comments on the suggestions presented in your petition. Any comments received in 

response to the proposals in the petition will be considered as part of the final rule.

Sincerely,

/s/

Lirio Liu

Director, Office of Rulemaking
No. 11-7201.

#### Rickey Jackson, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1086, 132 S. Ct. 833,

181 L. Ed. 2d 540,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8803.

December 5, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 148 (Monday, August 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 41266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20549]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDA.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Institute on Drug Abuse, including consideration of personnel 
qualification and performance, and the competence of individual 
investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDA.
    Date: August 4, 1998.
    Time: 1:00 PM to 3:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: Division of Intramural Research, NIDA, John Hopkins 
Bayview Campus, Bldg. C, 2nd Floor Auditorium, 5500 Nathan Shock 
Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224.
    Contact Person: Stephen J. Heishman, Research Psychologist, 
Clinical Pharmacology Branch, Addiction Research Center, National 
Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, 5500 
Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, (410) 550-1547.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the intramural research review cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos., National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 28, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-20549 Filed 7-31-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 13, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41368 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MELVIN EDIS MEJIA-VILLAFRANCA, also known as Melvin Mejio, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-326-ALL

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Melvin Edis Mejia-Villafranca raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001067700
<NAME>                        R.A.B. Enterprises, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                4,751
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                        42,192
<ALLOWANCES>                         (4,058)
<INVENTORY>                          72,846
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    123,315
<PP&E>                               50,133
<DEPRECIATION>                      (14,078)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      268,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                68,819
<BONDS>                              99,150
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                           36,671
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        268,648
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    417,297
<CGS>                               324,377
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        89,071
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    413,448
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   11,841
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (7,992)
<INCOME-TAX>                         (2,812)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (5,180)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,742
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                           (438)
<EPS-BASIC>                               0
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0



</TABLE>
No. 11-6976.

#### Redale Barbour, Petitioner v. Brock & Scott, PLLC, et al.

565 U.S. 1120, 132 S. Ct. 1015,

181 L. Ed. 2d 751,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 360.

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina denied.

Same case below, 365 N.C. 332, 717 S.E.2d 386.
2 May 2005 ************************** 

NSN: 8940-01-527-5894 * MONOGRAPH NO: 1A11 

 *************************** 

Item: Chicken in a Szechwan style sauce (CSS) 

Document: PCR-C-065, Chicken in a Szechwan Style Sauce, Packaged in a Polymeric Tray, 

Shelf Stable 

Approximate Caloric Value Per Serving: 150 Component Classification: Primary 

Estimated Shelf Life: 36 months at 80°F 

Item Characteristics

Appearance: 

Chicken: Whole muscle strips shall be sizes typically produced by a 2 inch by 1/2 inch 

by 1/2 inch machine setting and have a cooked chicken color. 

Sauce: Tan to light brown translucent color and may contain visible specks of spices. 

Carrots: Slices of 1/4 inch to 3/8 inch thick by 7/8 inch to 1-1/4 inch in diameter, with a 

bright orange color. 

Bamboo shoots: Off white to light tan color and approximately 2 to 2-1/2 inches long 

by 1/2 inch wide by 1/8 inch thick. 

Red bell peppers: Strips of 1⁄4 inch strips with a bright red color. 

Scallions: Slices 1 inch in length and medium green or white in color. 

Odor: Cooked chicken in a slightly spicy Szechwan style sauce. 

Flavor: Cooked chicken in a slightly spicy Szechwan style sauce. 

Texture: 

Chicken strips: Moist and tender.

Sauce: Smooth and moderately thick. 

Carrots: Moderately soft to moderately firm. 

Bamboo shoots: Slightly fibrous and tender. 

Red bell peppers: Slightly soft to slightly firm. 

Scallions: Soft to slightly firm. 

Possible Deteriorative Changes 

Appearance: 

Oiling off, weeping, separation of sauce; darkening of chicken and 

Sauce; more fines in sauce. 

Odor: Sour, bitter, heat stressed. 

Flavor: Sour, bitter, heat stressed. 

Texture: Tough, dry chicken; mushy carrots, bamboo shoots, red bell peppers and scallions; 

weepy, separated sauce. 

Unique Examination/Test Procedures

NA 

Special Notes

NA 
2 May 2005 ************************** 

NSN: 8940-01-527-5894 * MONOGRAPH NO: 1A11 

 ***************************
H. R. 3317 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To permit the Scipio A. Jones Post Office in Little Rock, Arkansas, to accept 

and display a portrait of Scipio A. Jones, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SCIPIO A. JONES POST OFFICE PORTRAIT. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The postmaster of the Scipio A. Jones Post 

Office, located at 1700 Main Street in Little Rock, Arkansas, may 

accept and display, in the lobby of such Post Office, a painting, 

by artist Wade Hampton, of a portrait of Scipio A. Jones. 

(b) COSTS; GIFTS.—The United States Postal Service shall not 

be responsible for any costs of carrying out subsection (a), including 

the costs of displaying the painting. The postmaster referred to 

in such subsection is authorized to accept on behalf of the Government the painting and any services necessary to display the 

painting. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.