2007 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 1-5-2007 

# D e r W ee r v . U SA P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 06-1392

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2007 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion
" D e r W e e r v . U SA" (2007). 2007 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1808. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007/18081 NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT 

### No. 06- 1392 GORDON R. DER W EER, Appe l l ant

v. UN I TE D S TA TE S O F A ME RI CA ; FE DE RA L B UREAU O F P RI SO NS APP EAL F ROM THE UNI TE D ST ATE S DI S TRI CT C OURT F OR T HE DI S T RI CT OF T HE VI RG I N I S L ANDS

D . C . C i vi l N o. 01- cv- 00118 D i s t r i ctJ udge: T he H onor abl e R aym ond L . Fi nch, C hi ef J udge

A r gued: D ece m ber5, 2006 B efore: M cK E E , B A R R Y and S T A P L E T O N , C i rcui tJudg es

( O pi ni on Fi l ed: J anuary5, 2007)

R enee D . D ow l i ng, E s q. ( A r gued) P. O . B ox 1047 C h ristia n ste d , S a in t C ro ix U SV I , 00821 C ouns el forA ppel l ant2

E r nes tF. B at enga, E s q. ( A r gued) O ffi ce of t he U ni t ed St at es A t t or ney 1108 K i ng St r eet , Sui t e 201 C h ristia n ste d , S a in t C ro ix U SV I , 00820 C ouns el forA ppel l ees OP I NI ON B A R R Y , C i r cui tJ udge A ft erfi ve y ear s of pr ocee di ngs befor e the D i s t r i ctC our t , t he C our tdi s m i s s ed the
c o m p lain t o f

a p p e llan t G o rd o n R . D e r W e e r. D e r W e e r c o n c e d e s th a t h e f a iled to pr oper l ypl ead e i t hera B i vens act i on ora cl ai m under42 U . S. C . § 1983, butar gues t hat t he D i s t r i ctC our ts houl d nothave di s m i s s ed hi s compl ai nton t hos e “pur el yt echni cal gr ounds ” and s houl d have pe r m i t t ed hi m t o fi l e the i dent i cal amended compl ai ntt he C our tr ej ect ed i n M ar ch 2002. H e as ks , i n t he al t ernat i ve, t hatw e perm i thi m t o amend hi s compl ai ntunder28 U . S. C . § 1653 s o he ca n, att hi s l at e dat e, cur e w hathe des cr i bes
a s h is d e f

e c tiv e a lle g a tio n s o f

s u b je c t m a tte r j u ri s d ic tio n . W e h a v e c o n s id e re d th e s u b m is s io n s o f th e p a rt ie s a n d h a v e h e a rd o ra l a rg u m e n t. N ot hi ng need be s ai d ot hert han thati n N ovember 2002, t he D i s t r i ctC our tgr ant ed l eave to D e r W e e r to f

ile a n a m e n d e d c o m p lain t an d in Ja n u a ry2 0 0 3 , A p ril 2 0 0 3 , an d A p ril 2004, confi r m ed i t s i nt entt o acc eptan amended compl ai nti n pr operfor m . D erW eer f ile d n o th in g .3

T h e o rd e r o f

th e D is tr ic t C o u rt w ill b e a f f ir m e d .