alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00436-CV

Christopher Brown and Carrie Brown

v.

Enterprise Recovery Systems, Inc.

§

§

§

§

From the 48th District Court

of Tarrant County (48-243196-10)

August 22, 2013

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in part of the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the 

judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part. We affirm the

portion of the trial court’s judgment as to Christopher Brown’s and Carrie Brown’s 

DTPA claim, their Texas Fair Debt Collection Practices Act claim, their claim for 

treble damages under the TCPA, and their claim for a violation of § 1692E(5) of 

the FDCPA. We reverse the portion of the trial court’s judgment as to 

Christopher Brown’s and Carrie Brown’s claims for violations of the TCPA, § 

1692D(5) of the FDCPA, and § 1692D(6) of the FDCPA and remand this case to 

the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is further ordered that each party shall bear their own costs of this 

appeal, for which let execution issue.
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _________________________________

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
[Cite as State ex rel. Brooks v. Baker Ross, 2023-Ohio-1349.]

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

)ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COUNTY OF SUMMIT )

STATE EX REL. CARL C. BROOKS

Relator

v.

JUDGE SUSAN BAKER ROSS

Respondent

C.A. No. 30519

 

ORIGINAL ACTION IN 

PROCEDENDO

Dated: April 26, 2023

PER CURIAM.

{¶1} Relator, Carl C. Brooks, has petitioned this Court for a writ of procedendo to 

compel Respondent, Judge Susan Baker Ross, to rule on his “Motion for New Trial and Jury 

Verdict Forms” pending in Mr. Brooks’ underlying case. Judge Baker Ross has moved to dismiss 

the complaint as moot because she has ruled on the motion. Because Mr. Brooks’ did not comply 

with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 2969.25, this Court must dismiss this action.

{¶2} R.C. 2969.25 sets forth specific filing requirements for inmates who file a civil 

action against a government employee or entity. Judge Baker Ross is a government employee and 

Mr. Brooks, incarcerated in the Allen Correctional Institution, is an inmate. R.C. 2969.21(C) and 

(D). A case must be dismissed if an inmate fails to comply with the mandatory requirements of 

R.C. 2969.25 in the commencement of the action. State ex rel. Graham v. Findlay Mun. Court, 

106 Ohio St.3d 63, 2005-Ohio-3671, ¶ 6 (“The requirements of R.C. 2969.25 are mandatory, and 

failure to comply with them subjects an inmate’s action to dismissal.”).
C.A. No. 30519

Page 2 of 2

{¶3} Mr. Brooks did not pay the cost deposit required by this Court’s Local Rules. He 

also failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25(C), which sets forth specific requirements for an inmate 

who seeks to proceed without paying the cost deposit. Mr. Brooks filed a motion to proceed 

without paying the cost deposit, but his affidavit was not notarized. He also failed to file a 

statement of his prisoner trust account that sets forth the balance in his inmate account for each of 

the preceding six months, as certified by the institutional cashier. R.C. 2969.25(C).

{¶4} Because Mr. Brooks did not comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 

2969.25, the case is dismissed. Costs taxed to Mr. Brooks.

{¶5} The clerk of courts is hereby directed to serve upon all parties not in default notice 

of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. See Civ.R. 58(B).

JENNIFER L. HENSAL

FOR THE COURT

CARR, J.

STEVENSON, J.

CONCUR.

APPEARANCES:

CARL C. BROOKS, Pro Se, Relator.

SHERRI BEVAN WALSH, Prosecuting Attorney, and MARRETT W. HANNA, Assistant 

Prosecuting Attorney, for Respondent.
No. 11-7256.

#### Geary Wayne Waters, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1098, 132 S. Ct. 859,

181 L. Ed. 2d 559,

2011 U.S. LEXIS 8966.

December 12, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 648 F.3d 1114.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.1 (HOME INTERIORS LOGO) [Employee Name]
[Employee Home Address] Re: Amendment to 2002 Stock Option Equity Value Targets Dear [Employee Name]: The purpose of this letter is to inform you that, at a meeting held on
September 24, 2004, the Companys Board of Directors approved an amendment
to the Equity Value Targets for each outstanding Stock Option granted under
the Companys 2002 Stock Option Plan. As you may be aware, the terms of the 2002 Stock Options permit the
Company to amend the Equity Value Targets (which are used for purposes of
determining whether the Stock Options vest) to reflect changes in the Companys
business, including to reflect acquisitions, divestitures, or for such other
reasons as it deems appropriate. On March 31, 2004, the Company consummated a
refinancing transaction, which altered the Company s capital structure from
the structure in place at the time the 2002 Stock Options were granted.
Accordingly, the Board deemed it appropriate to adjust the Equity Value Targets
to give effect to this change in the Companys capital structure. Set forth below is a table that shows the previous Equity Value
Targets and the amended Equity Value Targets for your 2002 Stock Options: Fiscal Year Ended
    
    Old Equity Value Target
    
    New Equity Value TargetDecember 31, 2003
    
    $430 million
    
    $415 millionDecember 31, 2004
    
    $555 million
    
    $500 millionDecember 31, 2005
    
    $885 million
    
    $670 millionDecember 31, 2006
    
    $1,090 million
    
    $795 million
 This letter will serve as an amendment to your existing stock option
agreement(s) with respect to your 2002 Stock Options. Accordingly, we suggest
that you file this letter with your existing Stock Option agreement(s). If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 972-695-1091. Very truly yours, (-s- Kenneth J. Cichocki)
Kenneth J. Cichocki
Sr. VP of Finance & CFO 1649 Frankford Rd. West
 Carrollton, TX 75007
 phone 972.695.1000  www.homeinteriors.com
PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL 

SUPPORT DOCUMENT:

ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM

FOR COMMERCIAL EQUIPMENT:

ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR ELECTRIC MOTORS

July 23, 2012

U.S. Department of Energy

Assistant Secretary

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Building Technologies Program

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards

Washington, DC 20024
This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy

by staff members of

Navigant Consulting, Inc.

and

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Powers of Attorney, Solomon Goldfinger


 Exhibit (10)(h) 

NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY CORPORATION 
 POWERS OF ATTORNEY FOR A LIMITED PURPOSE 
 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of
the undersigned constitutes and appoints each of Matthew M. Grove, Thomas F. English, Paul W. Horrocks, Linda M. Reimer and George E. Silos, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, each with full power of substitution and resubstitution
for him in his name, place and stead, to sign any and all registration statements or other filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission or any state regulatory agency or authority applicable to New York Life Insurance and Annuity
Corporation Variable Annuity Separate Account – II (File Number 033-53344) and any amendments or supplements thereto, and withdrawals thereof, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission or any state regulatory agency or authority granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he might or could do in person in his capacity as a Director or officer of New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corporation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. 
 These Powers of Attorney may be signed in one or more counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same document. 
  

			
		
	  
 Christopher T. Ashe
	  	  

Steven D. Lash

		
	  
 Christopher O.
Blunt
	  	  
 Theodore A. Mathas

		
	  
 Frank M. Boccio
	  	  
 Mark W. Pfaff

		
	  
 Stephen P. Fisher
	  	  
 Arthur H. Seter

		
	  
 John T. Fleurant
	  	  
 Michael E. Sproule

		
	  
 Robert M. Gardner
	  	  
 Joel M. Steinberg

		
	 /s/ Solomon Goldfinger
 Solomon Goldfinger
	  	  

Susan A. Thrope


 Dated: April 3, 2012
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 37 (Thursday, February 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 8833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4113]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA).

ACTION: Notice of open Federal Advisory Committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The SBA is issuing this notice to announce the location, date, 
time and agenda for the next meeting of the National Small Business 
Development Center (SBDC) Advisory Board.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, March 17, 2009 at 1 p.m. 
EST.

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held via conference call.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), SBA announces the meeting 
of the National SBDC Advisory Board. This Board provides advice and 
counsel to the SBA Administrator and Associate Administrator for Small 
Business Development Centers.
    The purpose of this meeting is to discuss following issues 
pertaining to the SBDC Advisory Board:

--Board Wrap-Up of ASBDC Spring Meeting.
--SBA Update.
--Member Roundtable.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The meeting is open to the public; 
however, advance notice of attendance is requested. Anyone wishing to 
be a listening participant must contact Alanna Falcone by Friday, March 
13, 2009, by fax or e-mail in order to be placed on the agenda. Alanna 
Falcone, Program Analyst, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416, 
Phone, 202-619-1612, Fax 202-481-0134, e-mail, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1f7e737e71717e31797e737c70717a5f6c7d7e31787069"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="79181518171718571f18151a16171c390a1b18571e160f">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Additionally, if you need accommodations because of a disability or 
require additional information, please contact Alanna Falcone at the 
information above.

Bridget E. Bean,
Acting Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-4113 Filed 2-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DLA G-Invoicing Division 1 | Page

 Version 1.1 | October 2022

 

To: DLA Trading Partners 

From: DLA G-Invoicing Division, J8G 

Subject: DLA Legacy Process for G-Invoicing 

 

 

BACKGROUND: 

 

• By October 1, 2022, U.S. Treasury has mandated all reimbursable buy/sell intragovernmental 

transactions (IGT) including agreements (7600A General Terms and Conditions (GT&C)), 

orders, performance, receipt/acceptance, and IPAC settlement flow through the G-Invoicing 

system. 

• DLA has brokered agreements in G-Invoicing since early 2019 and will continue to work with 

trading partners to get high-level GT&Cs in place. DLA will not be implementing its GInvoicing system solution for orders, performance, receipt, and acceptance, and IPAC 

settlement until approximately April 2024. 

• The Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) has instructed DoD to avoid work 

and payment stoppages at all costs related to G-Invoicing requirements and functionality. 

 

 

WORKING WITH DLA UNTIL G-INVOICING IMPLEMENTATION ~APRIL 2024: 

 

• DLA will continue to broker agreements in G-Invoicing while implementing its system 

solution. 

• DLA will continue to use legacy processes and previously used legacy forms to generate and 

accept orders. This includes use of the following preferred forms, as examples: 

o DD Form 448: Military Interdepartmental Purchase Request (MIPR) 

o DD Form 448-2: Acceptance of MIPR 

o Fiscal Service Form 7600B: U.S. Government Order Form (manually processed) 

 DLA cannot generate or accept FS 7600Bs within G-Invoicing until system 

implementation. 

• Assisted acquisition Direct Citation MIPRs are not within the G-Invoicing scope. 

• DLA will work with trading partners to finalize in-progress 7600A GT&Cs and create new 

7600A GT&Cs when one is not present for a corresponding order. 

o This will need to take place while order processing continues to avoid stoppages. 

o DLA 7600A GT&Cs linked to outstanding orders will be prioritized.

• The Defense Finance and Accounting Service will continue to handle IPAC settlement 

(payment and collection of funds) on behalf of DLA using legacy processes and legacy ALCs 

until DLA has a full system solution in production. 

o Note: DLA ALC 97008050 is only applicable for Treasury Direct Disbursing (TDD) 

and G-Invoicing GT&Cs and cannot be used for legacy orders) 

 

IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS: 

 

• If you have questions related to DLA GT&Cs, please email: 

dla-gtc-coe@dla.mil 

• If you have general questions or questions related to DLA orders, performance, receipt & 

acceptance, and/or IPAC settlement, please email: g-invoicing@dla.mil 

DLA J8G Trading Partners MIPR Attachment
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 38 (Friday, February 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 8900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4013]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Siskiyou Resource Advisory Committee (RAC)

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Siskiyou Resource Advisory Committee will meet on 
Thursday, March 5, 2009 to recommend Title II projects for fiscal year 
2009 under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self Determination 
Act of 2000. The meeting will be held at the Grants Pass Interagency 
Office, 2164 NE. Spalding Avenue, Grants Pass, Oregon, It begins at 
9:30 a.m., ends at 4:30 p.m.; the open public comments begin at 11 a.m. 
and ends at 11:30 a.m. Written comments may be submitted prior to the 
meeting and delivered to Designated Federal Official, Scott Conroy at 
the Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest, 3040 Biddle Road, Medford, 
Oregon 97504.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest 
Public Affairs Officer Patty Burel at telephone: (541) 618-2113, or 
cell phone (541) 941-4268, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#245446515641486442570a4241400a5157"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="58283a2d2a3d34183e2b763e3d3c762d2b">[email protected]</span></a>, or USDA Forest 
Service, 3040 Biddle Road, Medford, OR, 97504.

    Dated: February 19, 2009.
Scott Conroy,
Forest Supervisor, Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest.
[FR Doc. E9-4013 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
INCOMPLETE CLOSURE 

Table IV, Defect No. 2, Critical defect if leakage is evident. 

Defect No. 101, Major Defect if no leakage is evident. 

Incomplete closure resulting from false seam.
No. 11-7413.

#### Claudette Mitchell, Petitioner v. University Medical Center, Inc.

565 U.S. 1130, 132 S. Ct. 1048,

181 L. Ed. 2d 770,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 92,

January 9, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 35.2  LOGO ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE OF LNR PARTNERS, LLC The undersigned, Job Warshaw,
being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the Special Servicer), as special servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed onSchedule Ihereto, hereby certifies, subject to any
limitations listed on Schedule Ihereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:  1.
A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1,
2018 and ending on December 31, 2018 (or any other shorter period set forth onSchedule Ihereto) (the Reporting Period), and of the Special Servicers performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made
under my supervision; and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122
of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  LNR PARTNERS, LLC,a Florida limited liability companyBy

/s/ Job WarshawJob WarshawPresident
 Dated: February 19, 2019      1601 Washington Avenue  Suite 700  Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164 Telephone: (305) 695-5600  Fax: (305) 695-5601




---

Schedule I CGCMT 2017-B1 Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2017-B1,
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-B1 Citibank,N.A., 388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor New York NY 10013 Cirino Emanuele Citibank,N.A., Global Transaction Services 388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor New York NY 10013 John Hannon Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. 390 Greenwich Street, 5th Floor New York NY 10013 Paul Vanderslice Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. 388 Greenwich Street, 19th Floor New York NY 10013 Richard Simpson Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. 388 Greenwich Street, 17th Floor New York NY 10013 Ryan M. OConnor Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas 1761 E. Saint Andrew Place Santa Ana CA 92705 Group Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas Deutsche Bank National Trust Company Trust & Agency
Services 1761 E. Saint Andrew Place Santa Ana CA 92705 James Noriega TriMont Real Estate Advisors, LLC One Alliance Center 3500 Lenox Road, Suite G1 Attn: Operating Advisor Atlanta GA 30326
No. 11-7930.

#### Tuan Bui, Petitioner v. United States.

565 U.S. 1183, 132 S. Ct. 1155,

181 L. Ed. 2d 1027,

2012 U.S. LEXIS 1051.

January 23, 2012.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### Shepard v. 1st Judicial District

OP 16-0712

11/29/16

Denied

Original Proceeding Supervisory Control
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1802 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 54 ) IV-E-4 9 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/4/200811:57:59 AM

Sheet 54 of 117P. 2 

# A-10-3T A5L-E-4 1 Date : Februar

y 24,200 0 Ai r an d Radiatio n Docke

t #A-90-3 7 iBriscolLlntegr

E itegrate d Implementatio n Group , ITPID , MD-1 2 Subject : Meeting wit

h Comple x Manufacturer s Grou

p O n Februar y 10,2000 , th e EP

A met wit h representative s o

f agrou p o f complex manufacturer s (attende e lis t i s attached) . Th

e first hal f o f the discussio n focused primaril y o n th e clea n uni t tes t in EPA' s Jul

y 199 6 NS R Refor

mrulemakin g proposal . Som e o f th e topic s covere d include d th e time b y which technolog y mus t b e applied , th e duratio n o f

th e exclusio n unde r th e test , an

d definin g BACT wher

e ther e ha s been no recen

t BAC T decision . Durin g th e second half

o f th e meeting , industr

y representative s presente d an d defined wha

t they perceive d a s problem s unde

r th e curren t NS R progra

mincludin g issue s associate d wit h wha t change s constitut e aproject , change s tha

t debottleneck

aprocess , an

d unit s whos e operation s ar e linked . Attachmen

t cc : Pa mSmith , (MD-12 ) Jo n Devine , OG

C

EPA AI R DOCKE TP. 3



# Mms _ g/<3L fjMi^err rtyuNk f^OA<W

Ujavd 

## ."[©I M yVvSc M I

WVD'V \ 

# foil .Chalet Geidb (U\,t,k TCKAI^^ S 

## tfi^lc/AR

£PA/OA& K /^P6 A HoQrSu.^/MBJ>A £{*,.* & r/fll(ic~~KSL (TOXO^K- 

## Pacific/Afft
^ o ^ 

# De . /^ B 

# £>Pfrle>Grc %//o/oo Pf/au& 3&3L 

## S"W ~ I fab*/ 

## S\^ 1 641-5(3 5 c iv 

## ^ 54(- 55.75 "

W 541 - o^ /

4 H LSI-1121



# 2-
80

Section C: Recommended Funding Levels, by State

Arizona

Program Intervention Budgets: 2014

Recommended Annual Investment $64.4 million

Deaths in State Caused by Smoking

Annual average smoking-attributable deaths 8,300

Youth aged 0-17 projected to die from smoking 115,100

Annual Costs Incurred in State from Smoking

Total medical $2,383 million

State Revenue from Tobacco Sales and Settlement

FY 2012 tobacco tax revenue $337.8 million

FY 2012 tobacco settlement payment $101.1 million

Total state revenue from tobacco sales and settlement $438.9 million

Percent Tobacco Revenue to Fund at Recommended Level 15%

Annual Total (Millions) Annual Per Capita

Minimum Recommended Minimum Recommended

I. State and Community Interventions 

Multiple social resources working together will 

have the greatest long-term population impact.

$16.8 $20.9 $2.56 $3.19

II. Mass-Reach Health Communication Interventions 

Media interventions work to prevent smoking initiation, 

promote cessation, and shape social norms.

$7.9 $11.4 $1.21 $1.74

III. Cessation Interventions 

Tobacco use treatment is effective and highly cost-effective. $14.8 $23.7 $2.26 $3.62

IV. Surveillance and Evaluation 

Publicly funded programs should be accountable and 

demonstrate effectiveness.

$4.0 $5.6 $0.60 $0.86

V. Infrastructure, Administration, and Management 

Complex, integrated programs require experienced 

staff to provide fiscal management, accountability, 

and coordination.

$2.0 $2.8 $0.30 $0.43

TOTAL $45.5 $64.4 $6.93 $9.84

Note: A justification for each program element and the rationale for the budget estimates are provided in Section A. The funding estimates presented are based on adjustments for changes in population and cost-of-living increases since Best Practices—2007 was published. The actual 

funding required for implementing programs will vary depending on state characteristics, such as prevalence of tobacco use, sociodemographic 

factors, and other factors. See Appendix E for data sources on deaths, costs, revenue, and state-specific factors. 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • Office on Smoking and Health

www.cdc.gov/tobacco • tobaccoinfo@cdc.gov • 1 (800) CDC-INFO or 1 (800) 232-4636 

2014