### Analysis of Standards 90.1 Meeting Evaluation

February 17,2000 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good Good 

# d satisfactory Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted 

### -- No, Not nearly enough dyes, 

### As much as I wanted No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunityto participate as much asyou wanted? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough &yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, w-hatadditional sieps are needed?

5. How could we have improved this effort?

6.Additional comments/suggestions

w 

### Thank youforfilling out thisevaluation Name (optional)

### Analysis 

### of Standards

### 90.1 MeetingEvaluation

February 17,2000 1. What is your overall evaluationof this public meeting? Excellent very ~ood 

# x Good Satisfactory Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequatelydiscussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 

## % Yes, 

### As much as I wanted No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunityto participate as much as you wanted? Yes, More than I wanted x~es, As much as I wanted No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?

iqr i'ci I P/*L( 1 5. How could we have improved this effort?

6.Additional commentslsuggestions



### Thank 

### youforfilling 

### out this 

### evaluation. Name (optional)

### Analysis of 

### Standards90.1 Meeting 

### Evaluation

February 17,2000 1. What is your overall evaluationofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good 

# ' Good satisfactory Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunityto participate as much asyou wanted? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? 

## POG. 5. How could we have improved this effort?

6.Additional comments/suggestions



### Thank youfor$lling out this evaluation, 

# < i JVSor Gl~iu J Name (optional)

### Analysis 

### of 

### Standards90.1 

### MeetingEvaluation



### February 17,2000 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good 

# J ~ood Satisfactory Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? 

# -f Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 

## - Yes, As much as 

### I wanted No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunitytoparticipateas much as you wanted? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough *Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?

5. How could we have improved this effort? 

# - 6.Additional cornments/suggestions



### Thank youforfilling out this evaluation.

### Analysis 

### of Standards 90.1 

### MeetingEvaluation



### February 17,2000 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good ~ood 

# l;i satisfactory Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequatelydiscussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 3. 

### Did you have an opportunityto participate as much as you wanted? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough Des, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? C" 

## yr 

# r )$ 4b
5. How could we have improved this effort?

6.Additional comments/suggestions



### Thank youfor filling out this evaluation. C Name (optibnal)

### Analysis 

### of Standards 90.1 Meeting Evaluation



### February 17,2000 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthispublic meeting? Excellent Very ~ood 

# / ~ood Satisfactory Useless2. Wereyour priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 3. Did you have 

### an opportunitytoparticipate as much asyou wanted? i LYes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? 

# &h,&& - +>vLw.*

# *i"--p PI-^ U 5. How could we have improved this effort? 

### - - 

# ;44Livn-i 1~ 

### 42-L

6. Additional cornments/suggestions

-- 

### Thank youforflling out this evaluation. Name (optional)

### Analysis of Standards90.1 

### Meeting 

### Evaluation

February 17,2000 1. What is your overall evaluation of this public meeting? Excellent 

### J ~ery~ood Good Satisfactory Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than Iwanted No, Not nearly enough wYes, 

### As much as I wanted No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunityto participate as much as you wanted?

4es, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?

5. How could we have improved this effort? 

# R,in,s es+ 

# I dwyoa~4(-if$fi'~

# ~*~~'s' L' 6.Additional cornments1suggestions



### 117rankyouforfilling out this evaluation. 

# /JlJc 

# flf PJ Name (optional)

### Analysis of Standards

### 90.1 Meeting Evaluation

February 17,2000 1. What is your overall evaluationofthis public meeting? Excellent 

## )( Very Good Good Satisfactory Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 

# aYes, As much as 

### I wanted No, Not at all 3. 

### Did you have an opportunityto participate as much as you wanted? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough Fs, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?

5. How could we have improved this effort?

6.Additional comments/suggestions



### Thankyou

### for

### filling out this evaluation.

### Analysis of Standards 90.1 Meeting Evaluation



### February 17,2000 rall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Very Good Good Satisfactory Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequatelydiscussed during this meeting? ws,More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough dyes,

### As much as I wanted No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunityto participate as much asyou wanted? es, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough As much as I wanted No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?

5. How could we have improved this effort?

6. Additional cornments/suggestions


# - ------I^- I. 

### Thank you for

### filling out this evaluation

### Analysis of Standards90.1 MeetingEvaluation



### February 17,2000 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good 

## J Good Satisfactory Useless 

### 2. Were your priority issues adequatelydiscussed during this meeting? Yes, Morethan I wanted No, Not nearly enough Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 

### 3. Did you have an opportunityto participate as much as you wanted? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough T~es, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 4. Based onthis meeting, what additional steps areneeded?

5. How could we have improvedthis effort?

6. Additional comrnents/suggestions



### Thank youforfilling out this evaluation Name (optional)